UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
PROXY
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed
by the Registrant [x] |
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] |
Check
the appropriate box: |
[
] |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
[
] |
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a -
6(e)(2)) |
[x] |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
[
] |
Definitive
Additional Materials |
[
] |
Soliciting
Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
(Name
of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
[x] |
No
fee required. |
[
] |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and
0-11. |
|
(1) |
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Total
fee paid:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
[
] |
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials: |
[
] |
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount
Previously Paid:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Filing
Party:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Date
Filed:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ |
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
Clarendon
House
Church
Street
Hamilton,
Bermuda
June
15, 2005
Dear
Shareholders:
It
is my pleasure to invite you to the 2005 Annual General Meeting of the
Shareholders of Helen of Troy Limited. The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m.,
Mountain Daylight Time, on Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at the Camino Real Hotel,
101 S. El Paso Street, El Paso, Texas. In addition to the business to be
transacted at the meeting, members of management will present information about
the Company's operations and will be available to respond to your questions.
At
our Annual Meeting, we will vote on proposals to elect nine directors, to
increase the number of Common Shares available under the Helen of Troy Limited
1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan to make available to Officers and
Employees of the Company excluding the CEO and an Executive Vice President, and
make certain additional amendments to the Plan, to approve certain amendments to
modernize the Company’s Bye-laws to allow for notice of and voting by directors
and shareholders at meetings by electronic or other means, and to appoint KPMG
LLP as the Company's independent auditors. The accompanying Notice of Annual
Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement contains information that you should
consider when you vote your shares.
It
is important that you vote your shares whether or not you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting. Please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the
accompanying envelope as soon as possible. If you plan to attend the Annual
Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person
at that time. I look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting. On behalf of
the management and directors of Helen of Troy Limited, I want to thank you for
your continued support and confidence.
Sincerely,
/s/
Gerald J. Rubin
Gerald
J. Rubin
Chairman
of the Board,
Chief
Executive Officer
and
President
|
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
Clarendon
House
Church
Street
Hamilton,
Bermuda
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD AUGUST 2, 2005
Notice
is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders (the "Annual
Meeting") of Helen of Troy Limited, a Bermuda Company (the "Company"), will be
held at the Camino Real Hotel, 101 S. El Paso Street, El Paso, Texas, on
Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, for the following
purposes:
1.
|
To
set the number of director positions at nine and to vote for the election
of a board of nine directors;
|
2.
|
To
consider an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Plan to increase the number of Common Shares of the
Company available to Officers and Employees of the Company excluding the
CEO and an Executive Vice President, and make certain additional
amendments to the Plan;
|
3.
|
To
consider certain amendments to modernize the Company’s Bye-laws to allow
for notice of and voting by directors and shareholders at meetings by
electronic or other means;
|
4.
|
To
appoint KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company to serve for the
2006 fiscal year; and
|
5.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
The
record date for determining shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the Annual Meeting is June 9, 2005. You are urged to read carefully the
attached Proxy Statement for additional information concerning the matters to be
considered at the Annual Meeting.
If
you do not expect to be present in person at the Annual Meeting, please sign and
date the enclosed proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope that has been provided for your convenience. The prompt return of
proxies will help ensure the presence of a quorum and save the Company the
expense of further solicitation.
You
are cordially invited and encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
/s/
Vincent D. Carson
Vincent
D. Carson
Vice-President,
General Counsel and Secretary
El
Paso, Texas
June
15, 2005
IMPORTANT
WHETHER
OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE MARK, DATE, AND
SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. IF YOU DO ATTEND
THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
Proxy
Statement |
1 |
|
Solicitation
of Proxies |
1 |
|
Voting
Securities and Record Date |
2 |
|
Proposal
1: Election
of Directors |
2 |
|
Corporate
Governance, The Board, Board Committees and Meetings |
3 |
|
Shareholder
Communications to the Board of Directors |
6 |
|
Director's
Compensation |
6 |
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
8 |
|
Stock
Price Performance Graph |
9 |
|
Executive
Officers |
10 |
|
Executive
Compensation |
10 |
|
|
Summary
Compensation Table |
10 |
|
|
Option
Grants in Last Fiscal Year |
11 |
|
|
Aggregated
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values |
11 |
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information |
11 |
|
Employment
Contract for the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President |
12 |
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions |
13 |
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
14 |
|
Report
of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation |
14 |
|
Report
of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors |
17 |
|
Audit
and Other Fees Paid to Our Independent Auditors |
18 |
|
Proposal
2: |
Proposal to increase
the number of shares of Common Shares available under the Helen
of |
|
|
|
Troy
Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan and make certain
additional |
|
|
|
amendments
to the plan |
19 |
|
Proposal
3: |
Proposal to approve
certain amendments to modernize the Company’s Bye-laws to
allow |
|
|
|
for
notice of and voting by directors and shareholders at meetings by
electronic or other |
|
|
|
Means |
26 |
|
Proposal
4: |
Appointment of
Independent Auditors |
27 |
|
Shareholder
Proposals |
28 |
|
Relationship
with Independent Public Accountants |
28 |
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance |
28 |
|
Quorum;
Voting |
28 |
|
Other
Matters |
29 |
|
Householding
of Materials |
29 |
|
Communicating
with Helen of Troy |
29 |
Appendix A: |
Helen of
Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan with
proposed |
|
|
amendments |
A-1 |
|
|
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
Clarendon
House
Church
Street
Hamilton,
Bermuda
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
August
2, 2005
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
The
accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Helen of Troy
Limited (the "Company") for use at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the
"Annual Meeting") to be held at the Camino Real Hotel, 101 S. El Paso Street, El
Paso, Texas, on Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time,
and at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. A proxy may be revoked by filing a
written notice of revocation or an executed proxy bearing a later date with the
Secretary of our Company any time before exercise of the proxy or by attending
the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Forms of proxy and proxy statements are
to be distributed on or about June 15, 2005.
If
you complete and submit your proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote the
shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you
submit a proxy card but do not fill out the voting instructions on the proxy
card, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your
proxy as follows:
|
•
|
FOR
setting the number of director positions to nine and FOR the election of
the director nominees set forth in “Proposal 1: Election of Board of
Directors.”
|
|
•
|
FOR
the proposal to increase the number of Common Shares available for issue
to its employees by an additional 750,000 shares, to limit the maximum
amount of shares that can be issued in any fiscal year to 250,000, but
exclude Mr. Gerald J. Rubin, the Company's Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President and Mr. Christopher L. Carameros, an
Executive Vice-President, from any future grants under the 1998 Plan and
to require that any restricted shares granted under the plan will reduce
the
available shares
under the plan by 3 shares. This proposal is set forth in “Proposal 2:
Proposal to increase the number of Common Shares available under the Helen
of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan and make
certain additional amendments to the plan.”
|
|
•
|
FOR
the proposal to amend the Company’s Bye-laws to modernize the Company’s
Bye-laws to allow for notice of and voting by directors and shareholder at
meetings by electronic or other means set forth in “Proposal 3:Amendment
to Bye-Laws”.
|
|
•
|
FOR
the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditors of the Company set
forth in “Proposal 4: Appointment of Independent Auditors.”
|
In
addition, if other matters are properly presented for voting at the Annual
Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in accordance
with their best judgment. We have not received notice of other matters that may
properly be presented for voting at the Annual Meeting. Your Helen of Troy
shareholder vote is important. If you do not vote your shares, you will not have
a say in the important issues to be voted upon at Helen of Troy’s 2005 Annual
Shareholders’ Meeting. To pass, each proposal included in this year’s proxy
statement requires a majority of votes voting at the Annual Meeting. Banks and
brokers cannot vote on their clients’ behalf on non-routine
proposals, such as the Proposal to Increase the Number of Common Shares
Available under the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock
Plan, and the proposal to amend the Company’s Bye-laws, which further reduces
the number of votes cast. To ensure that your vote is recorded promptly, please
vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in
person.
The
Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended February 28, 2005 ("fiscal
2005"), including financial statements, is enclosed. It does not form any part
of the material provided for the solicitation of proxies.
The
cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to
solicitation by mail, officers and employees of the Company may solicit the
return of proxies by telephone and personal interview. Forms of proxy and proxy
material may also be distributed through brokers, custodians and like parties to
beneficial owners of our Common Shares, par value $.10 per share (the "Common
Stock"), for which we will, upon request, reimburse the forwarding expense. D.F.
King & Co., Inc. will also assist the Company in the solicitation of proxies
for a fee of $7,500, plus expenses.
VOTING
SECURITIES & RECORD DATE
The
close of business on June 9, 2005, is the record date for determination of
shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As May
20, 2005 there were 29,878,201 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding,
each entitled to one vote per share.
PROPOSAL
1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The
Bye-laws of the Company state that the number of our Directors shall be
established by the Shareholders from time to time but shall not be less than
two. The Board of Directors has recently recommended that the number of director
positions be set at nine, and accordingly the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee has identified nine candidates for election to the Board of
Directors.
The
nine persons named below are the nominees for election as Directors. Two of the
nine candidates, Gerald J. Rubin and Christopher L. Carameros are members of
Helen of Troy's senior management. Gerald J. Rubin and Stanlee N. Rubin are
married. Gerald J. Rubin and Byron H. Rubin are brothers. The Board of Directors
has determined that the remaining five candidates, Gary B. Abromovitz, John B.
Butterworth, Timothy F. Meeker, Adolpho R. Telles, and Darren G. Woody are
independent directors as defined in the applicable rules for companies traded on
The NASDAQ Stock Market ("NASDAQ"), and therefore, the majority of our nine
person Board of Directors will be independent as so defined. Each Director
elected shall serve as a Director until the next annual meeting of shareholders,
or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
Set
forth below are descriptions of the principal occupations during at least the
past five years of the nominees for election to our Board of Directors:
GARY
B. ABROMOVITZ,
age 62, has been Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and
lead Director since March 2002. He has been a Director of the Company since
1990. Mr. Abromovitz is an attorney and has been a consultant to several law
firms involving business related matters. He is active in real estate
development concentrating on industrial, commercial and historic properties. In
March, 2005, he joined the Board of Directors of Cardiovascular Biotherapeutics,
Inc. as lead Director and chair of the audit, compensation, and governance
committees.
JOHN
B. BUTTERWORTH,
age 53, has been a Director of the Company since August 2002. Mr. Butterworth is
a Certified Public Accountant and, since 1982, has been a shareholder in a
public accounting firm located in El Paso, Texas.
CHRISTOPHER
L. CARAMEROS,
age 51, has been a Director of the Company since June 1993. Mr. Carameros joined
the Company as Executive Vice-President in January 2003. Mr. Carameros has been
an officer and Director of L & M Asset Management Inc., a privately-held
company which holds certain of his personal investments, from August 1997 to the
present.
TIMOTHY
F. MEEKER,
age 58, has been a director of the Company since August 2004. Since 2002, Mr.
Meeker has served as President, and principal in Meeker and Associates, a
privately-held management consulting firm. Mr. Meeker served as Senior
Vice-President, Sales & Customer Development for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a
consumer products and pharmaceutical company, from 1996 through 2002. From 1989
to 1996, Mr. Meeker served as Vice-President of Sales for Bristol-Myers' Clairol
Division.
BYRON
H. RUBIN,
age 55, has been a Director of the Company since 1981. Mr. Rubin has been a
partner in the firm of Daniels & Rubin, an insurance and tax planning firm
in Dallas, Texas, since 1979.
GERALD
J. RUBIN,
age 61, founder of the Company, has been the Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company since June 2000. From 1984 to
June 2000, Mr. Rubin was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company. Mr. Rubin has been a Director of the Company since 1969.
Mr. Rubin
also serves on the Board of Directors of the El Paso Branch, Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, Texas.
STANLEE
N. RUBIN,
age 61, has been a Director of the Company since 1990. Mrs. Rubin is active in
civic and charitable organizations. She is a Partner for the Susan G. Komen
Breast Cancer Foundation.
ADOLPHO
R. TELLES, age 55,
was appointed as Director to succeed James C. Swaim on June 10, 2005. Mr. Telles
is a Certified Public Accountant. Since November of 2003, Mr. Telles has been a
business consultant providing advisory services to entities in the area of
corporate governance, internal auditing, and compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002. Previously, Mr Telles was a partner with the accounting firm of
KPMG LLP, and its predecessors for over 16 years.
DARREN
G. WOODY,
age 45, has been
a director of the Company since August 2004. Mr.
Woody is President and Chief Executive Officer of C.F. Jordan, a construction
services firm. He has served in this capacity since August of 2000. Previously,
Mr. Woody was a partner in the law firm of Krafsur, Gordon, Mott and Woody P.C.
James
C. Swaim who has served on our Board of Directors since August 2004 recently
accepted the position of Chief Financial Officer with Hillwood
Development Corporation, a Dallas-based real estate development company. Due to
time commitments of his new position, Mr. Swaim resigned from the Board
effective June 10, 2005. The Board of Directors elected Mr. Adolpho R. Telles to
fill the vacancy created on the Board by Mr. Swaim’s resignation.
VOTE
REQUIRED FOR ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The
nominees receiving a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be
elected as Directors.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR
SETTING THE NUMBER OF DIRECTOR POSITIONS AT NINE AND FOR
EACH OF THE NINE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE, THE BOARD, BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS
Corporate
Governance.
Corporate governance is typically defined as the system that allocates duties
and authority among a Company’s shareholders, Board of Directors and management.
The shareholders elect the Board and vote on extraordinary matters; the Board is
the Company’s governing body, responsible for hiring, overseeing and evaluating
management, particularly the Chief Executive Officer; and management runs the
Company’s day-to-day operations.
Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as our Code of Ethics, and the charters
of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee are available under the “Corporate Governance” heading of
the investor relations page of our website at the following address:
http://www.hotus.com.
Our
Company believes that it is in compliance with the corporate governance
requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards. The principal elements of these
governance requirements as implemented by our Company are:
|
• |
affirmative
determination by the Board of Directors that a majority of the directors
is independent, |
|
|
|
|
• |
regularly
scheduled executive sessions of independent directors, |
|
|
|
|
• |
Audit
Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation
Committee comprised of independent directors and having the purposes and
charters described below under the separate committee headings,
and |
|
|
|
|
• |
specific
Audit Committee authority and procedures outlined in the charter of the
Audit Committee. |
Independence.
The
Board of Directors has determined that the following five directors nominated
for election at the annual meeting: Gary B. Abromovitz, John B. Butterworth,
Timothy F. Meeker, Adolpho R. Telles, and Darren G. Woody, are independent
directors as defined in revised Rule 4200 of the NASDAQ listing standards
approved by the SEC, and, therefore, a majority of our Company’s proposed
nine-person Board of Directors is independent as so defined. The other directors
nominated for election at the annual meeting, Gerald J. Rubin, Stanlee N. Rubin,
Byron H. Rubin, and Christopher L. Carameros are not independent.
The
foregoing independence determination of our Board of Directors included the
determination that each of these five nominated Board members, if elected and
appointed to the Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
or Compensation Committee as discussed above, is respectively:
|
• |
independent
for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee under Rule 4350(d) of
the NASDAQ listing standards, that includes the independence requirements
of Rule 4200 and additional independence requirements under SEC Rule
10A-3(b); |
|
|
|
|
• |
independent
under the NASDAQ listing standards for purposes of membership on the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and |
|
|
|
|
• |
independent
under the NASDAQ listing standards for purposes of membership on the
Compensation Committee and also is a “non-employee director” under SEC
Rule 16b-3 and an “outside director” as defined in regulations under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. |
Our
Board of Directors has four committees: The Audit Committee, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive
Committee. The following table shows the composition of these committees over
the last fiscal year:
Director |
Audit |
Nominating
& Corporate Governance |
Compensation |
Executive |
Gary
B. Abromovitz |
M |
Chair |
Chair |
|
John
B. Butterworth |
M |
|
|
|
Christopher
L. Carameros |
|
|
|
|
Timothy
F. Meeker |
|
M |
M |
|
Byron
H. Rubin |
|
|
|
M |
Gerald
J. Rubin |
|
|
|
Chair |
Stanlee
N. Rubin |
|
|
|
M |
James
C. Swaim * |
Chair
through June 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
Adolpho
R. Telles |
Chair
since June 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
Darren
G. Woody |
|
M |
M |
|
M
= Current Member over the past Year
*
Resigned from the Board of Directors on June 10, 2005.
Executive
Committee.
The Executive Committee has the power to exercise all of the authority of the
Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Company,
except to the extent limited by the Company's Bye-laws and by applicable law.
All actions and resolutions of the Executive Committee are reported to the Board
of Directors at the next meeting of the Board for its review, approval and
ratification. The Executive Committee meets informally on a periodic basis
during the year. The Executive Committee did not adopt any resolutions or hold
any formal meetings during fiscal 2005.
Audit
Committee.
Our Audit Committee is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The primary purposes of this committee are to
oversee on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors: (1) the accounting and
financial reporting processes and integrity of our Company’s financial
statements, (2) the audits of our Company’s financial statements and
appointment, compensation, qualifications, independence and performance of our
independent auditors, (3) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
and (4) oversee the staffing, establishment and ongoing operation of our
internal audit function. The Audit Committee meets periodically with our Chief
Financial Officer and other appropriate officers in the discharge of its duties.
The Audit Committee also reviews the content and enforcement of the Company's
Ethical Code of Conduct, consults with our legal counsel on various legal
compliance matters and on other legal matters if those matters could materially
affect our financial statements. The Audit Committee met eleven
times during fiscal 2005, seven meetings of which had certain audit committee
members participating via telephone.
The
Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are
independent as previously described. In addition, the Board of Directors had
determined that Mr. Swaim, qualified as an "audit committee financial expert" as
defined by the SEC in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and
was independent within the meaning of Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors determined that all of
the members of the Audit Committee meet the requirement of the NASDAQ listing
standards that each member be able to read and understand fundamental financial
statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow
statement. Additionally, the Board of Directors had determined that Mr. Swaim
met the requirement of the NASDAQ listing standards that at least one member of
the committee has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite
professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or
background which results in the individual’s financial sophistication. As
previously discussed, on June 10, 2005, Mr. Swaim resigned from the Board of
Directors. Adolpho R. Telles, was appointed on June 10, 2005 to succeed his
position on the Board of Directors and serve as Chairman of the Audit Committee
for the balance of the current year’s term. Mr. Telles has been determined by
the Board to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” who can satisfy
NASDAQ listing standards.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee.
The primary purposes of the committee are to (1) recommend to our Board of
Directors individuals qualified to serve on our Board of Directors for election
by shareholders at each annual meeting of shareholders and to fill vacancies on
the Board of Directors, (2) implement the Board’s criteria for selecting new
directors, (3) develop, recommend to the Board, and assess our corporate
governance policies, and (4) oversee the evaluation of our Board. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee receives recommendations from its members or
other members of the Board of Directors for candidates to be appointed to the
Board or committee positions, reviews and evaluates such candidates and makes
recommendations to the Board of Directors for nominations to fill Board and
committee positions.
The
committee's current process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director
consists of general periodic evaluations of the size and composition of the
Board of Directors, applicable listing standards and laws, and other appropriate
factors with a goal of maintaining continuity of appropriate industry expertise
and knowledge of our Company. The
committee looks for a number of personal attributes in selecting candidates
including: sound reputation and ethical conduct; business and professional
activities, which are complementary to those of the Company; the availability of
time and a willingness to carry out their duties and responsibilities
effectively; an active awareness of changes in the social, political and
economic landscape; an absence of any conflicts of interest; limited service on
other boards; and, a commitment to contribute to the Company's overall
performance placing it above personal interests. The
Committee held one meeting during fiscal 2005.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates
recommended by shareholders. Any candidate recommended by shareholders must meet
the same general requirements outlined in the previous paragraph, to be
considered for election. Any shareholder who intends to present a director
nomination proposal for consideration at the 2006 Annual Meeting and intends to
have that proposal included in the proxy statement and related materials for the
2006 Annual Meeting, must deliver a written copy of the proposal to our
Company’s principal executive offices no later than the deadline, and in
accordance with the notice procedures, specified under "Shareholder Proposals"
in this Proxy Statement and in accordance with the applicable requirements of
SEC Rule 14a-8.
If
a shareholder does not comply with the foregoing Rule 14a-8 procedures, the
shareholder may use the procedures set forth in our Company’s Bye-laws, although
our Company would in the latter case not be required to include the nomination
proposal as a proposal in the proxy statement and proxy card mailed to
shareholders. For shareholder nominations of directors to be properly brought
before an annual meeting by a shareholder pursuant to the Bye-laws, the
shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of
our Company. To be timely, written suggestions for candidates, accompanied by a
written consent of the proposed candidate to serve as a director if nominated
and elected, a description of his or her qualifications and other relevant
biographical information, must be delivered for consideration by the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee prior to the next annual meeting to the
Secretary of the Company, Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda not
less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the
preceding year’s annual meeting. In the event that the date of the annual
meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from
such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so
delivered not earlier than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not
later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such
annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of
the date of such meeting is first made.
Under
SEC rule 14a-8 (and assuming consent to disclosure is given by the proponents
and nominee), our Company must disclose any nominations for director made by any
person or group beneficially owning more than 5% of our outstanding common stock
by the date that was 120 calendar days before the anniversary of the date on
which its proxy statement was sent to its shareholders in connection with the
previous year's annual meeting. Our Company did not receive any such
nominations.
Compensation
Committee.
The primary purposes of the committee are to (1) review and approve corporate
goals and objectives relevant to the chief executive officer's compensation, (2)
evaluate the CEO's performance in light of those goals and objectives, (3)
either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as
directed by the Board), determine and approve the CEO's evaluation based on this
evaluation, (4) make recommendations to the Board with respect to non-CEO
compensation, incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, and (5)
produce
an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company's proxy
statement.
The Board of Directors has determined that the members of this committee are
independent as previously described. In fiscal 2005, the Compensation Committee
met quarterly in
connection with the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors, and
telephonically once. The Committee also
conducted numerous informal telephonic discussions with its advisors throughout
the year.
Meetings
of Board of Directors.
The full Board of Directors met formally four times during fiscal 2005 and
telephonically on three occasions. The Board also acted by unanimous consent
twice during fiscal 2005. Each of the Directors attended 100% of the aggregate
number of formal Board of Directors meetings or consents and committee meetings
or consents held or acted upon during the period for which he or she acted as a
Director during fiscal 2005. The Company expects all Board members to attend its
Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders, unless circumstances would prevent a
Board member from doing so. All Board members except for Stanlee N. Rubin
attended the prior year's Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders.
SHAREHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Any
record or beneficial owner of our stock who has concerns about accounting,
internal accounting controls, or auditing matters relating to our Company may
contact the Audit Committee directly. Any record or beneficial owner of our
stock who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors on any other matter
should also contact the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has undertaken on
behalf of the Board of Directors to be the recipient of communications from
shareholders relating to our Company. If particular communications are directed
to the full Board, independent directors as a group, or individual directors,
the Audit Committee will route these communications to the appropriate directors
or committees so long as the intended recipients are clearly
stated.
Communications
intended to be anonymous may be made by calling our national hotline service at
866-210-7649 or 866-210-7650, if you would prefer to communicate in Portuguese
or Chinese. When you call, please identify yourself as a shareholder of our
Company intending to communicate with the Audit Committee (this third party
service undertakes to forward the communications to Audit Committee if so
requested and clearly stated). You may also send communications intended to be
anonymous by mail, without indicating your name or address, to Helen of Troy
Limited, 1 Helen of Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas, 79912, USA, Attention: Chairman
of the Audit Committee. Communications not intended to be made anonymously may
be made by calling the hotline number or by mail to that address, including
whatever identifying or other information you wish to communicate.
Communications
from employees or agents of our Company will not be treated as communications
from our shareholders unless the employee or agent clearly indicates that the
communication is made solely in the person’s capacity as a shareholder.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
For
fiscal 2005, each member of the Board of Directors of the Company who was not an
employee of the Company received quarterly retainers of $6,000 and fees of
$3,000 for each quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors attended. During
fiscal 2005 the Deputy Chairman of the Board received quarterly retainers of
$10,000, the Audit Committee Chair also received quarterly retainers of $10,000
and the Compensation Committee Chair received quarterly retainers of $5,000.
Non-chair members of the Audit Committee received fees of $6,000 for each
quarterly Audit Committee meeting attended. Non-chair members of the
Compensation Committee received fees of $3,000 during fiscal 2005. The Board
members also received reimbursement for travel and lodging expenses incurred in
connection with attending all such meetings.
Under
the Helen of Troy Limited 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan”) for
Non-Employee Directors, each non-employee Director receives, on the first day of
each fiscal quarter, stock options to acquire 4,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock. Stock options granted to non-employee Directors have an exercise
price equal to the median of the high and low market prices of the Common Stock
on the last trading date preceding the date on which the stock options are
granted. Such stock options vest after one year. The Directors Plan expired by
its terms on June 6, 2005. As of the expiration date, there were 280,000 shares
available to grant that were previously approved by the shareholders for
issuance under the Directors’ Plan. The Board of Directors believes that the
granting of stock options to Board members is in the best interest of the
Company’s shareholders because it allows them to participate in the appreciation
of the Company’s stock price which aligns their interests with the interests of
the Company’s shareholders. The Compensation Committee considered placing a
proposal before the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting to extend the
term of the Directors’ Plan for an additional three-year period, which would
have permitted future awards of the remaining 280,000 shares previously approved
by the shareholders to the directors. However, the Compensation Committee and
the independent Directors believe that it is more important, at this time, to
provide the Company’s key officers and employees, other than Messrs. Rubin and
Carameros, with equity-based compensation to remain competitive in the market,
and therefore, an extension of the Directors Plan is not being requested at this
time. The Compensation Committee will re-evaluate the Director’s Plan in future
years. The Compensation Committee is recommending to the Company’s shareholders
at the Annual Meeting the approval of an additional 750,000 shares of Common
Stock for issuance under the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Plan to key officers and employees, other than to Messrs. Rubin
and Carameros.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth as of May 5, 2005, the beneficial ownership of the
Common Stock of the Directors, nominees for the Board of Directors, the
executive officers of the Company, the Directors and executive officers of the
Company as a group, and each person known to the Company to be the beneficial
owner of more than five percent of the Common Stock:
|
|
COMMON
STOCK |
|
|
NAME
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER |
|
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED |
|
PERCENT
* |
Gerald
J. Rubin (1)(2) |
|
7,553,922
|
|
20.91% |
Stanlee
N. Rubin (1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
One
Helen of Troy Plaza |
|
|
|
|
El
Paso, Texas 79912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Byron
H. Rubin (2) |
|
26,000
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
B. Abromovitz (2) |
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
L. Carameros (2) |
|
169,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
B. Butterworth (2) |
|
25,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy
F. Meeker |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
C. Swaim |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darren
G. Woody |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adolpho
R. Telles |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Benson (2) |
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent
D. Carson (2) |
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group |
|
7,829,239 |
|
21.68% |
(12
persons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR
Corp. (3) |
|
2,980,000
|
|
8.25% |
82
Devonshire Street |
|
|
|
|
Boston,
Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAB
Capital Advisors, LLC. (4) |
|
2,919,855 |
|
8.08% |
712
Fifth Avenue, 42nd Floor |
|
|
|
|
New
York, N.Y. 10019. |
|
|
|
|
________________________
* |
Percent ownership is calculated based on
29,873,851 shares of the Company's Common Stock outstanding on May 5, 2005
and 6,246,069 stock options held by all grantees exercisable within 60
days of May 5, 2005. |
|
|
**
|
Ownership of less
than one percent of the outstanding Common Stock. |
|
|
(1) |
Does
not include 144,000 shares in a trust for the children of Gerald J. Rubin
and Stanlee N. Rubin in which they disclaim any beneficial ownership and
includes 276,980 shares held beneficially through a partnership in which
Gerald J. Rubin and Stanlee N. Rubin are partners.
|
(2) |
Includes
shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of May
5, 2005 as follows: |
Gerald
J. Rubin |
|
|
5,625,000
|
|
Stanlee
N. Rubin |
|
|
116,000
|
|
Byron
H. Rubin |
|
|
16,000
|
|
Gary
B. Abromovitz |
|
|
38,500
|
|
Christopher
L. Carameros |
|
|
134,586
|
|
John
B. Butterworth |
|
|
24,000
|
|
Thomas
J. Benson |
|
|
5,688
|
|
Vincent
D. Carson |
|
|
6,250
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,966,024
|
|
(3) |
According
to schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2005, and Form 13F filed on
February 14, 2005, FMR Corp. has sole dispositive power for 2,980,000
shares and sole voting power for -0- shares. |
|
|
(4) |
According
to schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2005, and Form 13F filed on
February 14, 2005, SAB Capital Advisors, LLC. has sole dispositive power
for 2,919,855 shares and sole voting power for 2,919,855 shares.
|
HELEN
OF TROY FIVE-YEAR
STOCK
PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The
graph below compares the cumulative total return of the Company to the NASDAQ
Market Index and a peer group index, assuming $100 invested March 1, 2000. The
Peer Group Index was the Dow Jones Industry Group - Cosmetics.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The
executive officers of the Company are Gerald J. Rubin, Christopher L. Carameros,
Vincent D. Carson and Thomas J. Benson. Messrs. Rubin and Carameros are also
Directors of the Company. See "Election of Directors."
THOMAS
J. BENSON,
age 47, has been Senior Vice-President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company since August 2003. Mr. Benson served as Chief Financial Officer of
Elamex, S.A. de C.V., a provider of manufacturing and shelter services, from
June 2002 to August 2003, and as Chief Financial Officer of Franklin Connections
/ Azar Nut Company, a manufacturer, packager and distributor of candy and nut
products, from May 1994 to June 2002. He has served as an investments director
in two private investment firms and spent seven years in public accounting. He
received his B.S. from St. Mary's College and his Masters Degree of Taxation
from De Paul University.
VINCENT
D. CARSON,
age 45, joined the Company on November 1, 2001, in the capacity of
Vice-President, General Counsel and Secretary, after a 16-year legal career in
private practice. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Carson was a shareholder in
Brandys Carson & Pritchard, P.C. from 1993 to 2001, and was a shareholder at
Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi & Galatzan, P.C. during 2001. Both firms are
located in El Paso, Texas.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The
following table sets forth the summary of compensation earned during fiscal 2003
through 2005 by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and its other Executive
Officers.
NAME
AND PRINCIPAL |
|
FISCAL |
|
SALARY |
|
BONUS |
|
COMPENSATION |
|
OPTIONS/SARS |
|
COMPENSATION |
|
POSITION |
|
YEAR |
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($)
|
|
Gerald
J. Rubin |
|
2005 |
|
600,000
|
|
9,320,685
|
(1) |
- |
|
-
|
|
73,203 |
(2)(3) |
Chairman,
Chief Executive |
|
2004 |
|
600,000
|
|
5,474,156
|
(1) |
- |
|
625,000
|
|
117,077 |
|
Officer,
and President |
|
2003 |
|
600,000
|
|
2,039,175
|
(1) |
- |
|
1,000,000
|
|
105,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
L. Carameros (4) |
|
2005 |
|
600,000
|
|
750,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
7,116 |
(2) |
Executive
Vice-President |
|
2004 |
|
498,000
|
|
269,154
|
|
-
|
|
300,000
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
83,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Benson (5) |
|
2005 |
|
267,500
|
|
109,615
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
6,780 |
(2) |
Senior
Vice-President |
|
2004 |
|
135,417
|
|
37,306
|
|
-
|
|
56,883
|
|
1,158 |
|
Finance
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent
D. Carson |
|
2005 |
|
191,000
|
|
45,546
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,114
|
(2) |
Vice-President
and |
|
2004 |
|
181,788
|
|
81,992
|
|
- |
|
5,000 |
|
3,334 |
|
General
Counsel |
|
2003 |
|
176,663
|
|
45,000
|
|
- |
|
5,000 |
|
270 |
|
________________________
(1) |
Amounts
calculated and awarded pursuant to the Company’s 1997 Cash Bonus
Performance Plan, as amended and approved by the shareholders in August
2003. |
|
|
(2) |
Amounts
in this column for fiscal 2005 include the
following: |
|
|
401(k)
Plan |
|
Group
Life Insurance |
|
Disability
Insurance |
|
Auto
Lease |
|
Gerald
J. Rubin |
|
$ |
5,312 |
|
$ |
2,772 |
|
$ |
5,798 |
|
$ |
16,464 |
|
Christopher
L. Carameros (4) |
|
|
6,150
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Thomas
J. Benson (5) |
|
|
6,150
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Vincent
D. Carson |
|
|
5,684
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
(3) |
Includes
amounts attributable to the economic benefit received for executive and
survivorship life insurance policies. The economic benefit of such
policies totaled $23,705 in fiscal 2005. During
fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company paid annual premiums of $360,000
in respect of the policies. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.” Also includes $19,152 attributable to non-business travel
for Mr. Rubin using a Company aircraft. The incremental cost to the
Company of non-business use of Company aircraft has been calculated by
adding pro-rated hourly flight charges associated with Mr. Rubin’s
non-business flights and those of his accompanying guests. As of October
22, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted a policy that prohibits executive
use of Company aircraft for non-business flights. |
|
|
(4) |
Mr.
Carameros joined the Company as an employee on January 1, 2003. Prior to
such appointment, Mr. Carameros was a non-employee Director of the
Company. Mr. Carameros continues to serve on the Board of
Directors. |
|
|
(5) |
Mr.
Benson joined the Company in August
2003. |
OPTION/SAR
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
-
NONE
-
________________________
AGGREGATED
OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR
VALUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
EXERCISE |
|
VALUE REALIZED |
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS/SARS AT
FISCAL YEAR-END
(#) |
|
VALUE
OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS /
SARS AT FISCAL YEAR-END ($)
(1) |
|
NAME |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
EXERCISABLE |
|
UNEXERCISABLE |
|
EXERCISABLE |
|
UNEXERCISABLE |
|
G.
Rubin |
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
30,392,100
|
|
|
5,625,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
80,640,825
|
|
|
-
|
|
C.
Carameros |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
134,586
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,066,568
|
|
|
-
|
|
T.
Benson |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,688
|
|
|
51,195
|
|
|
40,499
|
|
|
364,508
|
|
V.
Carson |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
|
99,678
|
|
|
172,898
|
|
________________________
(1) |
Represents
the difference between the last sale price of the Common Stock on February
28, 2005 ($28.33) and the exercise price of the option, multiplied by the
applicable number of options. |
The
following table summarizes certain equity compensation plan information as of
February 28, 2005:
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMAINING
AVAILABLE FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUTURE
ISSUANCE UNDER |
|
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES TO |
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE |
|
EQUITY
COMPENSATION |
|
|
BE
ISSUED UPON EXERCISE |
|
EXERCISE
PRICE OF |
|
PLANS
(EXCLUDING |
|
|
OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, |
|
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, |
|
SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN |
|
|
WARRANTS,
AND RIGHTS |
|
WARRANTS,
AND RIGHTS |
|
COLUMN
(a)) |
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security
holders |
6,845,569
|
|
$
14.60 |
|
714,373
|
(1) |
________________________
(1) |
Includes
353,887 shares authorized and available for issuance in connection with
the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 336,000
shares authorized and available for issuance under the Helen of Troy
Limited 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors which expired by
its term on June 6, 2005, and 24,486 shares authorized and available for
issuance under the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted
Stock Plan. |
EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACT FOR THE COMPANY’S
CHAIRMAN
OF THE BOARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
Mr.
Rubin’s employment contract (i) was amended on April 21, 2005 to reduce the term
from five years to three years, (ii) renews itself daily for a new three-year
term, (iii) provides for a base salary of $600,000, and (iv) provides for an
annual cash bonus payable in accordance with the Company’s 1997 Cash Bonus
Performance Plan. The formula for calculating the annual cash bonus for Mr.
Rubin was submitted to the Company’s shareholders for approval in 1997 and again
in 2003. The Company’s shareholders approved the formula on both occasions. The
annual cash bonus to Mr. Rubin is payable based on the earnings achieved by the
Company in any applicable fiscal year according to the following
scale:
|
|
AMOUNT
OF EARNINGS ACHIEVED BY |
|
AMOUNT
OF BONUS PAYABLE |
|
THE
COMPANY IN THE APPLICABLE |
|
AS
A PERCENT OF EARNINGS |
|
FISCAL
YEAR |
|
5% |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
to
|
|
$ |
30,000,000 |
|
6% |
|
$ |
30,000,001 |
|
|
to
|
|
$ |
40,000,000 |
|
7% |
|
$ |
40,000,001 |
|
|
to |
|
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
8% |
|
$ |
50,000,001 |
|
|
to
|
|
$ |
60,000,000 |
|
9% |
|
$ |
60,000,001 |
|
|
to
|
|
$ |
70,000,000 |
|
10% |
|
$ |
70,000,001 |
|
|
or
more |
|
|
|
|
For
the purposes of the bonus calculation, “earnings” means the sum of the
consolidated earnings from continuing operations before all income taxes of the
Company and its subsidiaries, minus extraordinary income, plus extraordinary
expenses, minus capital gains, and plus capital losses. All components of the
calculation are required to be determined in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The base salary paid to Mr.
Rubin in the fiscal year then reduces the amount of the incentive bonus
calculated above. Mr. Rubin’s incentive bonus for any fiscal year cannot exceed
$15,000,000. In fiscal 2005, Mr. Rubin received an annual cash bonus of
$9,273,811 and a special one-time bonus of $46,874 paid in connection with Mr.
Rubin’s consent in October 2004 to terminate his perquisite that allowed for
non-business use of the Company’s corporate airplane for up to $100,000 per
fiscal year.
Under
the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Rubin is entitled to receive 125,000
options to purchase Common Stock on the last business day of each of the
Company’s fiscal quarters and such options are immediately vested, assuming
there are options available under the Company’s plans. In the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004 and continuing throughout fiscal 2005, Mr. Rubin declined receipt of
the balance of available options in order to allow the remaining options in the
plan to be used to reward selected members of the Company’s management with an
equity ownership interest in the financial success of the Company.
Mr.
Rubin’s employment agreement also calls for the reimbursement of certain
expenses and taxes related to such reimbursements.
If
Mr. Rubin’s employment with the Company is terminated by an occurrence other
than death, disability or good cause, he will receive payments, each in an
amount equal to his monthly rate of basic compensation, which shall commence on
the date of termination and shall continue until the date the employment
contract would have expired but for said occurrence. Mr. Rubin would also
receive payments, payable annually after the close of each fiscal year of the
Company, each in an amount of incentive compensation and bonuses that would
otherwise have been payable to him if he had continued in the employ of the
Company for the same period, provided, however, the incentive compensation and
bonus payable with respect to any fiscal year shall not be less than the highest
annual incentive compensation and bonus award made to Mr. Rubin with respect to
the Company’s most recent three fiscal years ending prior to the date of
termination. If Mr. Rubin’s employment had been terminated on February 28, 2005
by an occurrence other than death, disability or good cause, he would have been
entitled to annual severance benefit payments (under the terms of his contract
which was amended on April 21, 2005) in an amount of not less than $9,873,811
for each of the three years following the date of termination.
Upon
the occurrence of a change in control of the Company, Mr. Rubin may elect to
terminate his employment with the Company, and upon such termination he would
receive a present-value lump sum payment of that amount due to him as basic
compensation if his employment contract had continued until the date the
employment contract would have expired but for said occurrence. In the event of
a change in control, Mr. Rubin will also receive a lump sum payment in an amount
equal to the amount of incentive compensation and bonuses that would otherwise
have been payable to him under the employment agreement. Such lump sum payment
shall be calculated using Mr. Rubin’s highest incentive compensation and bonuses
payable with respect to the Company’s most recent three fiscal years ending
prior to the date of the termination, with present value calculated using the
applicable federal rate for the date of the termination of employment. His
employment agreement was amended in April 2005 to provide that upon termination
in no event will the severance payments to Mr. Rubin exceed 2.99 times his base
amount, as defined in Section 280G of the Tax Code. If a change of control had
occurred on February 28, 2005 and Mr. Rubin’s employment had been terminated
under the terms of his amended contract, he would have been entitled to a
lump-sum severance benefit of $27,972,187.
If
Mr. Rubin’s employment is terminated by an occurrence other than by death,
disability or good cause, including upon a change in control, Mr. Rubin will
also receive: (1) all amounts earned, accrued or owing but not yet paid to him,
(2) immediate vesting of all options granted to him, (3) removal of all
restrictions on restricted stock awarded to him and immediate vesting of the
rights to such stock, if any, (4) medical benefits for him and his wife for life
and (5) paid premiums of his life insurance policies, required under his
employment contract. At February 28, 2005, Mr. Rubin did not own any restricted
stock or options that were not already vested. Mr. Rubin will also continue to
participate in all employee benefits plans, programs or arrangements available
to Company executives in which he was participating on the date of termination
until the date the employment contract would have expired but for said
occurrence or, if earlier, until he receives equivalent benefits and coverage by
another employer.
In
the event of Mr. Rubin’s death, all unpaid benefits under these agreements are
payable to his estate. Mr. Rubin’s contract grants him the right to elect a cash
payment of the remainder of his contract in the event of a merger, consolidation
or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to any
unaffiliated company or other person.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During
fiscal 2005, the Company continued an agreement (the "Lease") under which it
leases a 108,000 square foot warehouse facility in El Paso, Texas, from a real
estate partnership (the "Partnership") in which Gerald J. Rubin and Stanlee N.
Rubin are limited partners. The Company entered into the Lease in order to
expand its inventory storage capacity in El Paso, Texas. Under the terms of the
Lease, the Company pays $29,250 in monthly rent. The Company also pays certain
expenses associated with the operation of the facility. The Company leased the
warehouse facility for the entire fiscal year and made a total of $526,000 in
payments for associated rent and operating expenses during fiscal 2005. The
Company has obtained an appraisal from a third party confirming that the amount
of rent under the Lease is comparable to that being paid by other companies for
similar facilities in El Paso. The Company obtained comparable rental
information on similar properties from an unaffiliated real estate company at
the time of the Lease. This information was used to establish the rental rate
for this facility. The Lease is a month-to-month agreement. Either the Company
or the Partnership may cancel the Lease by providing the other party with notice
30 days in advance of terminating the Lease.
In July
1999, the Company entered into an agreement with the Partnership under which the
Company currently leases 3,601 square feet of office space and certain office
equipment in El Paso, Texas to the Partnership. The agreement currently calls
for the Company to receive $5,282 in monthly rent. During fiscal 2005, the
Company recorded $63,225 in rental income associated with this agreement. The
Company has obtained an appraisal from a third party confirming that the amount
of rent under such agreement is comparable to that being paid by other companies
for similar facilities in El Paso, Texas.
Byron
H. Rubin, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, earns ordinary insurance
agent's commissions in connection with the Company's group health, life and
disability insurance policies as well as in connection with certain life
insurance policies on its officers. During fiscal 2005, he received commissions
of approximately $30,000
from
policies sold to the Company.
Timothy
F. Meeker, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, was paid consulting
fees of $48,000 during fiscal 2005 in connection with marketing advisory
services provided to Idelle Labs, Ltd., the business unit in the Company’s
personal care segment that develops and distributes liquid hair styling
products, body powder and skin care products. Mr. Meeker continues to provide
and be compensated for such services in fiscal 2006 at a rate of $4,000 per
month.
All
of the above transactions have been
reviewed, approved and ratified by the Company's Audit Committee.
Prior
to July 2003, the Company had paid premiums for survivorship life insurance
policies on the lives of Gerald J. Rubin and Stanlee N. Rubin in the aggregate
insured amount of $29,000,000. The Company and a trust established for the
benefit of Gerald J. Rubin and Stanlee N. Rubin, which was the beneficiary of
the life insurance policies (the “Trust”), entered into a Split Dollar Insurance
Agreement dated March 1994 whereby the Trust agreed to repay the Company all of
the premiums paid under the policies from the proceeds of the policies. The
Trust owned the policies and collaterally assigned the proceeds from these
policies as collateral for the obligation to repay the aggregate premiums paid
by the Company under these policies. In July 2003, the Trust and the Company
entered into a Life Insurance Agreement under which the Trust transferred
ownership of the policies to the Company. The Company agreed to pay annual
premiums up to $360,000 on the policies and upon the death of the second to die
of Gerald J. Rubin or Stanlee N. Rubin, the Company shall receive the cash
surrender value of the policies and the Trust shall receive the balance of the
proceeds. As of March 2, 2005, the total aggregate death benefit of the policies
was $32,190,800, the aggregate cash surrender value of the policies was
$4,368,272, and the aggregate premiums paid by the Company since inception of
the policies was $3,960,000.
Through
fiscal 2002, the Company paid premiums on an executive universal life insurance
policy on the life of Gerald J. Rubin in the initial insured amount of
$5,000,000. Under the split dollar agreement for this policy, entered into in
June 2000, the Company is entitled to reimbursement for all premium payments it
has made on the policy out of any death benefits paid on the life of Gerald J.
Rubin. The
Company last paid a $43,431 annual premium on the policy in fiscal 2002. No
premiums have been paid on the policy since fiscal 2002. As of February 28,
2005, the total aggregate death benefit of the policies was $5,438,899, the
aggregate cash surrender value of the policies was $438,899, and the aggregate
premiums paid by the Company since inception of the policies was
$958,266.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
All
members of the Compensation Committee during 2005 were independent Directors,
and none of them were employees or former employees of Helen of Troy. During
2005, no Helen of Troy executive officer served on the Compensation Committee
(or equivalent), or the Board of Directors, of another entity whose executive
officer(s) served on Helen of Troy’s Compensation Committee or Board.
REPORT
OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
Compensation Committee has submitted the following report:
The
Compensation Committee is composed of three directors, two of whom were new
directors elected at our 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each director is
an “independent” outside director as defined by NASDAQ Corporate Governance Rule
4200(15).
We
adopted a new charter for the Committee in fiscal 2005 in response to the new
requirements of NASDAQ. This new charter became effective at our 2004 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders held on August 31, 2004. Under the new charter, the
Committee is responsible for developing the Company's executive compensation
strategy and for administering the policies and programs that implement this
strategy. With the changes to the Committee’s charter and in accordance with the
NASDAQ rules, the Committee will determine all compensation for the executive
officers in the future.
Review
of Compensation of Our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President
The
Committee reviews the compensation program for Mr. Gerald J. Rubin, our
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and determines his
compensation. Mr. Rubin is the founder of our Company. He served as President of
the predecessor company to our public Company. The Company went public in 1971
and Mr. Rubin served as President, CEO, and Chairman from 1971 to 1984. From
1984 to 1999 he served as CEO and Chairman. Since 2000, Mr. Rubin has continued
to serve as CEO and Chairman and in addition, serves as President and assumes
the associated responsibilities required of that title. We believe his
entrepreneurial skill and ability to attract key executive and employee talent
is vital to the success of the Company.
In
accordance with good corporate governance policy, the Committee performed a
thorough review of Mr. Rubin’s compensation arrangements, including, his
Employment Agreement, which has been in effect since March 1, 1999. The
Committee prepared a tally sheet setting forth all components of Mr. Rubin’s
compensation and retained a nationally recognized independent compensation
consultant to assist the Committee in its review. As a result of the review, the
Committee and Mr. Rubin believe that it would be in the best interests of the
shareholders to make modifications to certain provisions of his compensation
arrangements as follows:
· |
Elimination
of non-business use of corporate
aircraft |
After
September 11, 2001, the Board of Directors awarded Mr. Rubin a perquisite by
allowing him to use the corporate aircraft for non-business use up to a limit of
$100,000 annually, which sum was fully deductible by the Company. On October 22,
2004, Section 274(e) of the Tax Code became effective, limiting the
deductibility of personal use of Company aircraft. Therefore, effective October
22, 2004, the Committee, with Mr. Rubin’s consent, eliminated this perquisite,
in exchange for a one-time cash bonus in the amount of $46,874 was granted to
Mr. Rubin to replace the unused portion of the airplane allowance for fiscal
2005.
· |
Modification
of the Term of Mr. Rubin’s Employment
Agreement |
Historically,
the term of Mr. Rubin’s Employment Agreement has been five years and it renewed
on a daily basis. The length of the term had a direct correlation to the total
amount of his severance package in the event of a possible termination triggered
by a change in control or termination without cause. Section 280G(b)(3) of the
Tax Code, provides tax penalties on excess benefits resulting from a change in
control. Excess benefits occur if an individual’s total “compensatory payments”
resulting from a change in control are equal to or greater than 3 times the
individual’s average annual compensation for the last 5 years. This is sometimes
referred to as excess “parachute payments” and is not deductible by the Company.
Reduction
in the term of Mr. Rubin’s employment would materially reduce severance
compensation and, in conjunction with other modifications, would eliminate any
“golden parachute” payment subject to the 20% excise tax that the Company would
otherwise be required to reimburse to Mr. Rubin pursuant to the terms of his
Employment Agreement.
Therefore,
the Committee and Mr. Rubin agreed to reduce the term of his Employment
Agreement to three years, renewable on a daily basis, and to add a provision
that in no event shall the aggregate present value of the payments and benefits
provided to him under his Employment Agreement exceed 2.99 times his “base
amount” as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Tax Code.
Executive
Compensation
The
three basic elements of the Company's historic executive compensation for Mr.
Rubin and all Named Executive Officers (NEO’s) are:
· |
Annual
incentive compensation; and |
· |
Long-term
incentive compensation in the form of stock
options. |
In
addition, certain of our NEO’s have also received perquisites that are described
more fully in the “Summary Compensation Table” included in this proxy
statement.
Base
Salary
Mr.
Rubin’s base salary for fiscal 2005 was based on his existing employment
contract and provided for an annual base salary of $600,000. See "Executive
Compensation-Employment Contract". This base salary of $600,000 is deducted from
Mr. Rubin’s annual cash bonus incentive compensation when computing his total
annual cash compensation.
The
base salaries for the other NEO’s in fiscal 2005 were determined by the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer based on his determination of the skills and
experience required by the position, the effect of the individual's performance
on the Company and the potential of the individual, taking into account the
relevant market for compensation of comparable executives in competitive
businesses and the geographic market. In the future, the base salaries for the
other NEO’s will be determined by the Compensation Committee.
Annual
Incentive Compensation
Mr.
Rubin’s cash bonus is based solely upon the 1997 Cash Bonus Performance Plan, as
amended and discussed under “Employment Contract for the Company’s Chairman of
the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President.” The Company submitted the
1997 Cash Bonus Performance Plan to shareholders for consideration and approval
in 1997, and again in 2003. The Company’s shareholders approved the formula for
determining bonuses payable to Mr. Rubin on both occasions. Under this
shareholder-approved plan, Mr. Rubin earns a bonus based on the Company’s
achievement of earnings as discussed above. For fiscal 2005, Mr. Rubin earned a
bonus of $9,273,811 under the 1997 Cash Bonus Performance Plan. There is a
direct link between Mr. Rubin’s incentive compensation and the Company’s
financial performance, as Mr. Rubin’s incentive compensation is calculated based
upon the Company’s pre-tax earnings.
The
fiscal 2005 incentive bonuses for the other NEO’s and employees were based on
the Company’s historic methodology for determining bonuses. Historically, each
senior executive officer and other officers have a maximum bonus potential based
on a percentage of their base salaries. At the end of fiscal 2005, we made a
subjective determination of the Company’s performance for the fiscal year. We
then assigned a percentage payout up to 100% of the bonus potential for all
officers and made a preliminary calculation of bonuses. We then made some
subjective adjustments, in consultation with the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, to the calculated bonus for certain employees using the same
methodology used to determine base salaries. In addition, during fiscal 2005,
the Company made a discretionary bonus payment of $250,000 to Christopher L.
Carameros for his significant role in the successful acquisition of OXO
International.
Long-term
incentive compensation
Long-term
incentive compensation has consisted of grants of stock options under the
Company's stock option plans. Stock options have been granted based on the
subjective evaluation of the performance and position of the NEO’s and
employees. In 2003, the Committee recognized a need to balance Mr. Rubin’s
compensation package. The Committee and Mr. Rubin agreed to a substantial
reduction in stock options in exchange for an amendment to the 1997 Cash Bonus
Performance Plan that provided for a graduated bonus percentage tied directly to
the Company’s pre-tax earnings, which was approved by the shareholders. Mr.
Rubin’s employment contract provided for annual grants of options to acquire
500,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to the availability of options under the
Company’s option plans. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and continuing
throughout fiscal 2005, Mr. Rubin declined receipt of the balance of available
options, as the Company had very few options available under its option plans.
Instead, Mr. Rubin awarded options that could have been issued to him to other
NEO’s and employees. Determining an acceptable balance between cash bonus
incentives and long-term incentive stock options is an evolving process that
takes into consideration existing contracts and changing corporate viewpoints.
The
Committee believes the opportunity for stock ownership, combined with a
significant performance-based incentive compensation opportunity, forges a
strong link between the Company's management and shareholders. It is extremely
important to be able to offer long-term compensation incentives to our officers
and employees.
The
Committee’s philosophy is to attract and retain creative, talented, and highly
skilled individuals with the ability to work together in a manner that creates
shareholder value. This objective is best accomplished by making sure a stock
ownership component is included in compensation packages. Stock options are
inherently performance oriented. Increases in our stock price directly correlate
with performance by our officers and employees. Therefore, we ask our
shareholders to approve the stock option proposal placed in the proxy statement.
The proposal allows the Committee to administer up to 750,000 options over a
three-year period pursuant to criteria set by the Committee, reserved
exclusively for all officers and employees of the Company, excluding Messrs.
Rubin and Carameros.
Deductibility
of Compensation under Internal Revenue Code Section 162
(m)
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), places
a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that the Company may deduct
in any one year with respect to each of its five most highly paid executive
officers. Certain performance-based compensation approved by shareholders is not
subject to the deduction limit. The Company’s shareholder-approved 1998 Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Plan and the 1997 Cash Bonus Performance Plan, in
which awards under such plans constitute performance-based compensation, are not
subject to Section 162(m) of the Tax Code. To maintain flexibility in
compensating NEO’s in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the
Committee has decided that in making any compensation decisions they would not
allow 162(m) of the Tax Code to limit compensation decisions where the best
interest of the Company and its shareholders dictate otherwise.
Respectfully
submitted,
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
May
18, 2005
Gary
B. Abromovitz (Chairman)
Timothy
F. Meeker
Darren
G. Woody
The
foregoing report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed incorporated
by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference the Proxy
Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Composition.
The
Audit Committee of the Board is composed of the four directors named below. Each
member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial experience
requirements under both SEC and NASDAQ rules. In addition, the Board has
determined that James C. Swaim is an “audit committee financial expert” as
defined by SEC rules.
Responsibilities.
The
Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the
Board. The charter is reviewed annually for changes, as appropriate.
The
Audit Committee is responsible for oversight, on behalf of the Board of
Directors, of:
· |
Helen
of Troy’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, and the
integrity of its financial statements; |
· |
The
audits of the Company’s financial statements and the appointment,
compensation, qualifications, independence and performance of the
Company’s independent auditors; |
· |
The
Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
and |
· |
The
staffing, establishment and ongoing operation of the Company’s internal
audit function. |
Helen
of Troy’s management is responsible for: (a) maintaining Helen of Troy’s books
of account and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon; and (b)
maintaining the system of internal controls. The independent registered public
accounting firm is responsible for auditing Helen of Troy’s consolidated annual
financial statements.
The
Audit Committee’s function is one of oversight only and does not relieve
management of its responsibilities for preparing financial statements that
accurately and fairly present the Company’s financial results and condition, nor
the independent registered public accounting firm of their responsibilities
relating to the audit or review of the financial statements.
Review
with Management and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
In
this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
|
1. |
The
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm, together and separately,
Helen of Troy’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in
Helen of Troy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2005 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
The
Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees).
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
The
Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public
accounting firm, KPMG LLP, the written disclosures and the letter required
by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees), and the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG
LLP the independence of the registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
The
Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of services covered
by fees paid to KPMG LLP is compatible with maintaining the independence
of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
Based
on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs 1-4 above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited
consolidated financial statements be included in Helen of Troy’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for fiscal 2005, for filing with the SEC.
The
Audit Committee has approved and recommends that the shareholders appoint KPMG
LLP as Helen of Troy’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2006.
Respectfully
submitted,
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
May
11, 2005
James
C. Swaim (Chairman)
Gary
B. Abromovitz
John
B. Butterworth
The
foregoing report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference the Proxy
Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
AUDIT
AND OTHER FEES PAID TO OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The
following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG
LLP for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for the years
ended February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, and fees billed for other
services rendered by KPMG LLP during those periods.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees |
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
$ |
338,200 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees |
|
|
265,000
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Tax
Fees |
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
79,900
|
|
All
Other Fees |
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
725,000 |
|
$ |
438,200 |
|
In
the above table, in accordance with new SEC definitions and rules for proxy
statements, “audit fees” are fees Helen of Troy paid KPMG LLP for professional
services for the audit of Helen of Troy’s consolidated financial statements
included in Form 10-K and review of financial statements included in Form 10-Qs,
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 attestation procedures, or for services that are
normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees billed by KPMG LLP
consisted principally of an audit of our 401(k) plan; “tax fees” are fees for
tax compliance; and “all other fees” are fees billed by KPMG LLP to Helen of
Troy for other permissible work for services not included in the first three
categories. In 2004 "all other fees" consisted of services provided related to
the sale of Tactica and research and advice regarding compensation and benefit
issues related to stock options. In 2005 "all other fees" consisted principally
of assistance with the review of certain materials provided to prospective
lenders in connection with potential financing, selected due diligence
procedures in connection with an acquisition, and advice regarding foreign
statutory requirements in connection with the exercise of options. These
services are actively monitored (both spending level and work content) by the
Audit Committee to maintain the appropriate objectivity and independence in KPMG
LLP’s core work, which is the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
The
Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services described above that were
provided in fiscal 2005 in accordance with the pre-approval requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which became effective on May 6, 2003. Accordingly, there
were no services for which the de minimis exception, as defined in Section 202
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was applicable.
PROPOSAL
2: PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
AVAILABLE
UNDER
THE HELEN OF TROY LIMITED 1998 STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED
STOCK
PLAN AND MAKE CERTAIN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS
The Board
of Directors and the Compensation Committee have determined that it is in the
best interest of the Company and its shareholders to continue to offer
equity-based compensation to its employees as a part of the Company’s overall
compensation philosophy. The Company currently has very few options that are
available for grant under it's existing stock option plans. Accordingly, the
Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee are proposing to amend the
Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the “1998
Plan”) to:
· |
add
750,000 shares of Common Stock to the 1998 Plan, but exclude Mssrs. Gerald
J. Rubin, the Company's Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President and Christopher L. Carameros, an Executive Vice-President, from
any future grants under the 1998 Plan; |
· |
provide
that the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be granted
under the 1998 Plan in any fiscal year shall not exceed 250,000 shares;
and |
· |
provide
that each share of Restricted Stock, if any, granted in the future
pursuant to the 1998 Plan, shall reduce the available shares of Common
Stock subject to the 1998 Plan by three
shares. |
The
Compensation Committee decided to exclude Mssrs. Rubin and Carameros from future
grants until such time as it completes its overall evaluation of their total
compensation packages.
As of
May 5, 2005, there were only 19,486 shares available for the grant of stock
options and restricted stock awards under the 1998 Plan.
The Board
of Directors and the Compensation Committee have approved these proposed
amendments to the 1998 Plan, to be effective as of the date of approval thereof
by the Company’s shareholders.
The
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is
required to approve the amendments to the 1998 Plan described in this Proposal
2. If the Company’s shareholders do not approve the amendments described in this
Proposal 2, the 1998 Plan, as previously approved, will continue in effect until
all shares issuable are granted.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL. WE FIRMLY
BELIEVE THAT A BROAD-BASED EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PROGRAM IS A NECESSARY AND
POWERFUL EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE THAT ALLOWS THE COMPANY TO ATTRACT, RETAIN AND
REWARD A HIGHLY QUALIFIED MANAGEMENT TEAM.
The
purpose of the 1998 Plan is to:
· |
offer
selected employees of the Company or its subsidiaries an equity ownership
interest in the financial success of the
Company; |
· |
provide
the Company an opportunity to attract and retain the best available
personnel for positions of substantial responsibility; and
|
· |
encourage
equity participation in the Company by eligible Participants (as
hereinafter defined). |
Without
additional stock options available for issue, Helen of Troy will be forced to
consider other replacement alternatives, such as additional cash compensation,
to provide a market-competitive total compensation package necessary to attract,
retain and motivate the employee talent critical to the future success of the
Company. These cash replacement alternatives would then reduce the cash
available for investment in innovation and business growth.
The 1998
Plan provides for the grant by the Company of (a) options (“Options”) to
purchase shares of Common Stock, and (b) awards of shares of Common Stock
containing certain restrictions (“Restricted Stock”). Options granted under the
Plan may include nonstatutory options (“Nonstatutory Options”) as well as
incentive stock options (“Incentive Stock Options”) intended to qualify under
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and as
interpreted by the regulations there under (the “Code”).
The
closing sale price of the Common Stock on May 5, 2005, as reported by the NASDAQ
Stock Market, was $27.78 per share.
Certain
provisions of the 1998 Plan are summarized below. The complete text of the 1998
Plan, including the proposed amendments, is included in Appendix A of this
proxy.
AMOUNT
OF STOCK SUBJECT TO THE 1998 PLAN
Under the
terms of the 1998 Plan, the Company has been authorized to grant
(i) Options and (ii) awards of Restricted Stock (collectively, grants
of Options and Restricted Stock are referred to in this Proxy Statement as “Plan
Awards”) with respect to an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock (the
“Shares”). The proposed amendment to the 1998 Plan will increase the number of
authorized shares issuable under the 1998 Plan by 750,000 Shares. The Plan
allowed up to 600,000 of the aggregate number of Shares available under the 1998
Plan to be issued as Restricted Stock, however the Company elected not to issue
any restricted stock. The proposed amendment again allows restricted stock to be
granted, but will provide that each share of Restricted Stock granted in the
future pursuant to the 1998 Plan shall reduce the available Shares subject to
the 1998 Plan by three Shares. Therefore, of the 750,000 Shares made available
subject to the approval of the proposed amendment, no more than 250,000 of such
Shares may be issued in connection with grants of Restricted Stock. As of May 5,
2005, there were 19,486 Shares available for the grant of stock options and
restricted stock awards under the 1998 Plan. The Board of Directors believes
that this is not a sufficient number of Shares to accomplish the objectives
described above. The inclusion of 750,000 additional Shares subject to the 1998
Plan will enable the Company to further promote these objectives. In addition,
the proposed amendment to the 1998 Plan provides that the maximum number of
shares of Common Stock that can be granted under the 1998 Plan in any fiscal
year shall not exceed 250,000 Shares. Notwithstanding
the preceding sentence, in the event that in any fiscal year less than 250,000
Shares are granted under the Plan then the amount of Shares that can be granted
in any future fiscal year shall be increased by the excess of 250,000 over the
amount of Shares actually granted in such year until such excess number of
Shares have been granted. In addition, Shares available for grant as a result of
cancellation or termination of existing Plan Awards under the Plan shall also be
available for grant in any fiscal year until such Shares have been
granted.
ADMINISTRATION
OF THE 1998 PLAN
The
Company’s Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) administers the 1998 Plan.
The Committee must consist of at least two persons and each Committee member
must be a member of the Board of Directors who is both (a) a Non-Employee
Director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and (b) an Outside
Director, within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. In addition, under
the new NASDAQ standards, all of the members of the Committee must be
“independent.”
ELIGIBILITY
FOR PLAN AWARDS
Plan
Awards may be granted to selected employees of the Company or its subsidiaries
(the “Participants”) in consideration for services provided to the Company or
its subsidiaries; provided, however, that no Incentive Stock Option may be
granted to any individual who is not an employee of the Company or one of its
subsidiaries on the date of grant. The Committee will determine actual
participation in the 1998 Plan, provided the person is eligible to participate.
Therefore, the number of Participants who will participate in the 1998 Plan
cannot be determined precisely. Neither the benefits nor the amounts that will
be received by or allocated to each of the Participants or other executive
officers can be determined precisely at this time. At May 5, 2005, the Company
had approximately 120 employees who were eligible to participate in the 1998
Plan, of which 117 employees had option grants outstanding.
LIMITATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO COVERED EMPLOYEES
The total
number of Shares for which Options may be granted to any “covered employee”
within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code during any one-year period
shall not exceed 250,000 in the aggregate.
OPTIONS
UNDER THE 1998 PLAN
The
exercise price for any Option granted under the 1998 Plan shall be such price as
the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, but shall be not less than
100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant of such Option. In
the event that an Incentive Stock Option is granted to any person who, at the
time such Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of classes of shares of the Company or of any subsidiary
corporation of the Company (a “Ten Percent Shareholder”), then the exercise
price for the Option shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the
shares on the date the Option is granted.
Any
Option granted under the 1998 Plan is exercisable at such times, under such
conditions (including, without limitation, performance criteria with respect to
the Company and/or the optionee), in such amounts and during such period or
periods as the Committee determines on the date such Option is granted. However,
such Options shall not be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the
date such Option is granted. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to
a Ten Percent Shareholder, the Option shall not be exercisable after the
expiration of five years from the date such Option is granted. Payment for the
Shares upon exercise of an Option shall be made in cash, by certified check or,
if authorized by the Committee, by delivery of other Shares having a fair market
value on the date of delivery equal to the aggregate exercise price of the
Shares as to which such Option is being exercised, or by any combination of such
methods or by any other method of payment as may be permitted by applicable law
and authorized by the Committee.
With
respect to Incentive Stock Options, Options that are granted to Participants in
the 1998 Plan, which allow such Participants to purchase in excess of $100,000
(calculated as of the time the Option is granted) of the Company’s Common Stock
in any one calendar year under the 1998 Plan and all of the Company’s other
plans, are considered Nonstatutory Options that are not entitled to the
favorable tax treatment provided under Section 422 of the Code.
In
general, if an optionee ceases to be an employee of the Company for reasons
other than Permanent and Total Disability (as defined in the 1998 Plan) or
death, the optionee will have until the earlier of 30 days or the date the
Option expires to exercise the Option, to the extent the optionee was entitled
to exercise the Option on the date of termination. However, if the optionee is
an employee and is terminated without cause, the 30-day period described above
will be increased to 90 days, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, and
6 months, in the case of a Nonstatutory Option, to the extent the optionee was
entitled to exercise the Option on the date of termination.
If an
optionee is unable to continue to perform services for the Company or any of its
subsidiaries as a result of Permanent and Total Disability the optionee will
have until the earlier of 12 months from the date of such disability or the
date the Option expires to exercise the Option, in whole or in part,
notwithstanding that such Option may not be fully exercisable on such date. In
the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the optionee must have been an employee
since the date of grant and must be an employee on the date of Permanent and
Total Disability, to take advantage of this provision.
In
general, upon the death of an optionee, any Option held by such optionee will
terminate; provided that if the optionee’s death occurs during the term of an
Option and at the time of death such optionee was an employee the optionee’s
estate or person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or
inheritance will have until the earlier of 12 months from the date of such
optionee’s death or the date the Option expires to exercise the Option, in whole
or in part, notwithstanding that such Option may not be fully exercisable on
such date. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the optionee must have been
an employee since the date of grant and must be an employee on the date of
death, to take advantage of this provision.
Except as
may be permitted by the Compensation Committee, an Option granted under the 1998
Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed
of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution
or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or
Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(“ERISA”), or the rules there under, and is not assignable by operation of law
or subject to execution, attachment or similar process.
The Stock
Option Agreement (as defined in the 1998 Plan) evidencing any Incentive Stock
Option granted under the 1998 Plan shall provide that if the optionee makes a
disposition, within the meaning of Section 424(c) of the Code, of any share or
shares issued to him pursuant to the exercise of the Incentive Stock Option
within the two-year period commencing on the day after the date such Option is
granted or within a one-year period commencing on the day after the date of
transfer of the share or shares to him pursuant to the exercise of such Option,
he shall, within ten days of such disposition, notify the Company and
immediately deliver to the Company any amount of federal income tax withholding
required by law.
RESTRICTED
STOCK UNDER THE 1998 PLAN
The
Committee may grant awards of Restricted Stock under the 1998 Plan in accordance
with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement between the Company and
the Participant. Restricted Stock may be granted by the Committee either
separately or in combination with Options. Each grant of Restricted Stock shall
require a Participant to remain an employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries for at least six months from the date of grant. Restricted Stock
shall be granted to Participants for services rendered to the Company, and at no
additional cost to the Participant; provided, however, that the value of such
services must equal or exceed the par value of the Restricted Stock granted to
the Participant. The Committee must require as a condition to awarding any
Restricted Stock that a Participant hold the Restricted Stock for a period of
(1) one year following the date of such acquisition in the event such
Restricted Stock award vests upon the achievement of performance goals or
(2) three years following the date of such acquisition in the event such
Restricted Stock award does not vest upon the achievement of performance goals.
The proposed amendment will provide that each share of Restricted Stock granted
in the future pursuant to the 1998 Plan shall reduce the available shares of
Common Stock subject to the 1998 Plan by three shares.
The
Company must establish a restricted stock account for each Participant, to which
Restricted Stock granted to the Participant is credited. Every credit of
Restricted Stock shall be merely a bookkeeping entry and every grant of
Restricted Stock shall be considered contingent and unfunded until the
restrictions lapse. During the period of restriction such accounts shall be
subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors. The Participant’s rights to
the restricted stock account are no greater than that of a general creditor of
the Company. On the date the restrictions lapse, the Restricted Stock shall vest
in the Participant.
The
Compensation Committee determines the terms, conditions and restrictions of the
Restricted Stock on the date of grant. The restrictions shall lapse based upon
performance measures, targets, holding period requirements and other criteria
established by the Compensation Committee. Such criteria may vary among the
grants of Restricted Stock; provided, however, that once the Restricted Stock
has been granted and the criteria are established, such criteria may not be
further modified with respect to such grant. The Restricted Stock may not be
sold, assigned, transferred, redeemed, pledged or otherwise encumbered during
the period that the restrictions apply. The Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion, may establish procedures by which a Participant may defer the
transfer of Restricted Stock to the Participant.
The
Compensation Committee may provide from time to time that amounts equivalent to
dividends paid with respect to Common Stock be payable with respect to the
Restricted Stock held in the restricted stock account. Such amounts shall be
credited to the restricted stock account but shall be payable to the Participant
only when the restrictions lapse.
If a
Participant, with the consent of the Compensation Committee, ceases to be an
employee or ceases to provide services to the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, or dies or suffers from Permanent and Total Disability, the
restrictions applicable to the Participant’s Restricted Stock shall lapse in
accordance with such determination as the Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall make. A Participant who ceases to be an employee or to perform
services for the Company or any of its subsidiaries for any other reason shall
forfeit all of his grants of Restricted Stock which are still under restriction.
TAX
WITHHOLDING
No later
than the date as of which the value of any Plan Award or any Shares or other
amount received there under first becomes includable in the gross income of a
Participant for federal income tax purposes, such Participant must pay to the
Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Committee regarding payment
of, any federal, state or local taxes of any kind required to be withheld with
respect to such income. The Company and its subsidiaries have the right to
deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the
Participant to the extent permitted by law. Subject to approval by the
Compensation Committee, a Participant may elect to have such withholding
obligation satisfied, in whole or in part, by (1) authorizing the Company
to withhold from Shares to be issued pursuant to any award, a number of Shares
with an aggregate fair market value (as of the date the withholding is effected)
that would satisfy the withholding amount due, or (2) transferring to the
Company Shares owned by the Participant with an aggregate fair market value (as
of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding
amount due.
CAPITALIZATION
ADJUSTMENTS; MERGER; CHANGE IN CONTROL
Subject
to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of Shares
covered by each outstanding Option (as well as the exercise price covered by any
outstanding Option), the number of Shares of Restricted Stock credited to a
Participant’s restricted stock account and the aggregate number of Shares that
have been authorized for issuance under the 1998 Plan will be proportionately
adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares resulting
from a stock split, payment of a stock dividend with respect to the Common
Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares effected
without receipt of consideration by the Company. In the event of the dissolution
or liquidation of the Company, other than pursuant to a Reorganization (as
defined below), any Option granted under the 1998 Plan shall terminate as of a
date to be fixed by the Committee, provided that not less than 30 days
written notice of the date so fixed shall be given to each optionee and each
such optionee shall have the right during such period to exercise his Options as
to all or any part of the Shares covered thereby including Shares as to which
such Options would not otherwise be exercisable by reason of an insufficient
lapse of time.
In the
event of a Reorganization in which the Company is not the surviving or acquiring
company, or in which the Company is or becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of
another company after the effective date of the Reorganization, then (1) if
there is no plan or agreement respecting the Reorganization (“Reorganization
Agreement”) or if the Reorganization Agreement does not specifically provide for
the change, conversion or exchange of the Shares under outstanding unexercised
Options for securities of another corporation, then the Compensation Committee
shall take such action, and the Options shall terminate, as provided above; or
(2) if there is a Reorganization Agreement and if the Reorganization
Agreement specifically provides for the change, conversion or exchange of the
Shares under outstanding or unexercised options for securities of another
corporation, then the Compensation Committee shall adjust the Shares under such
outstanding unexercised Options (and shall adjust the Shares which are then
available to be optioned, if the Reorganization Agreement makes specific
provisions therefore) in a manner not inconsistent with the provisions of the
Reorganization Agreement for the adjustment, change, conversion or exchange of
such stock and such options.
For these
purposes, the term “Reorganization” shall mean any statutory merger, statutory
consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or
sale, pursuant to an agreement with the Company, of securities of the Company
pursuant to which the Company is or becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of another
company after the effective date of the Reorganization. Except as provided in
the 1998 Plan and except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee in
its sole discretion, any Options shall terminate immediately prior to the
consummation of such proposed action.
Subject
to the above, upon a Change in Control (as defined below) of the Company,
(1) all the outstanding Options shall immediately become fully exercisable,
and (2) any restrictions on the Restricted Stock will lapse and such
Restricted Stock shall immediately vest in the Participant. For these purposes,
a “Change in Control” shall have occurred if: (a) any person other than the
Company or its subsidiaries, or an employee benefit plan of the Company or its
subsidiaries, is or becomes the beneficial owner of 50% or more of the Common
Stock; or (b) a majority of the present members of the Company’s Board of
Directors cease to be members of the Board of Directors.
AMENDMENT
TO THE 1998 PLAN
The Board
of Directors in its sole discretion may, from time to time, amend the Plan;
provided that no amendment will be made without the requisite approval of the
shareholders of the Company that will materially increase the benefits accruing
to Participants under the 1998 Plan or will change the aggregate number of
Shares that may be issued under the 1998 Plan, other than any increase or
decrease in the number of issued Shares resulting from a stock split, payment of
a stock dividend or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued
Shares effected without receipt of consideration by the Company.
TERM
AND TERMINATION OF THE 1998 PLAN
The 1998
Plan will continue in effect until August 25, 2008. The Board of Directors may
terminate the 1998 Plan at any time in its sole discretion. Neither Restricted
Stock nor Options may be granted after the 1998 Plan is terminated. The
termination of the 1998 Plan, or any amendment thereto, shall not affect any
Shares previously issued to a Participant, any Option previously granted under
the 1998 Plan, or any Shares of Restricted Stock previously granted to a
Participant.
MISCELLANEOUS
The 1998
Plan is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code, and is
not subject to any of the provisions of ERISA.
FEDERAL
INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The
following general summary is based upon the Code and does not include a
discussion of any state or local tax consequences.
Incentive
Stock Options. An
optionee does not realize taxable income upon the grant or exercise of an
Incentive Stock Option.
The
income tax treatment of any gain or loss realized upon an optionee’s disposition
of Shares received upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option depends on the
timing of the disposition. If the optionee does not dispose of the Shares
received upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option within two years from the
date such Incentive Stock Option was granted, and does not dispose of such
shares within one year from the date of exercise, the difference (if any)
between the amount realized from the sale of such Shares and the exercise price,
will be taxed as capital gain or loss.
If an
optionee disposes of the Shares before the end of the applicable holding periods
described above (i.e., he makes a “disqualifying disposition”), the excess of
the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, over the exercise
price is taxable to the optionee as ordinary income, and the excess of the
selling price over the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise
is taxable to the optionee as capital gain. If the selling price exceeds the
exercise price but not the fair market value on the date of exercise, the excess
of the selling price over the exercise price is taxable to the optionee as
ordinary income. If the selling price is less than the exercise price, the
difference is treated as capital loss.
The
Company is not entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes with
respect to the grant or exercise of an Incentive Stock Option or the disposition
of Shares acquired upon exercise (if the applicable holding periods have been
met). In the event of a disqualifying disposition, however, the Company is
entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary
income recognized by the optionee.
Certain
optionees may be subject to the alternative minimum tax which in individual
cases could reduce or eliminate any tax benefits to them under the 1998 Plan.
If an
optionee exercises an Incentive Stock Option by delivering other Shares of the
Company that are substantially vested or with respect to which a Section 83(b)
election has been filed, under proposed regulations, the optionee will not
recognize any compensation income or gain with respect to the Shares
surrendered. The portion of the Shares received equal in number to the Shares
surrendered will have a basis equal to the basis of the Shares surrendered in
payment (which generally will be the exercise price). The holding period of such
Shares will be determined in accordance with proposed regulations. The optionee
will recognize no gain with respect to the remaining portion of Shares received,
the basis of such Shares will be zero and the holding period of such Shares will
begin on the date of receipt thereof by the optionee.
If an
optionee exercises an Incentive Stock Option using Shares received upon the
prior exercise of an Incentive Stock Option (whether granted under the Plan or
under another plan of the Company) and the participant has not held such stock
for the applicable holding periods, under proposed regulations the participant
will have made a disqualifying disposition of the number of Shares of prior
Incentive Stock Option stock used as payment for the exercise price of the
Incentive Stock Option. Generally, the optionee will recognize ordinary
compensation income with respect to the surrender of such Shares to the extent
of the excess of the fair market value of the Shares surrendered (determined as
of the date the Option relating to such Shares was exercised) over the exercise
price. The basis of the portion of the Shares received equal in number to the
Shares surrendered will equal the amount of ordinary compensation income
recognized by the optionee plus the optionee’s basis in the Shares surrendered.
The basis of the remaining portion of Shares received will be zero.
Nonstatutory
Stock Options. An
optionee will not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of a Nonstatutory
Option. However, upon exercise of a Nonstatutory Option, an optionee must
recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of the Shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price. Upon the
subsequent disposition of the Shares, the optionee will realize a capital gain
or loss, depending on whether the selling price exceeds the fair market value of
the Shares on the date of exercise. The optionee’s holding period in the Shares,
for capital gains and losses purposes, begins on the date of exercise.
Different
rules may apply with respect to exercises by optionees subject to the
short-swing profit recapture provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act (in
general, executive officers, Directors and Ten Percent Shareholders who have not
yet held their options for at least six months). Section 83 of the Code
provides that such an optionee will not recognize ordinary income upon exercise
(and the capital gains holding period will not begin) if the sale of Shares
acquired by such optionee pursuant to an Option could subject the optionee to
suit under Section 16(b). Such an optionee would then recognize ordinary
income (and the capital gains holding period would begin) when the optionee is
no longer subject to suit under Section 16(b). Persons acquiring Shares
subject to such a restriction, however, may elect (within 30 days of
exercise of the Option) under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed as of the
date of exercise, thereby fixing the ordinary income recognized from the
exercise to the spread between the fair market value on the date of exercise and
the exercise price paid for the Shares. Any change in the value of the Shares
after the date of exercise would be recognized as capital gain or loss only if
and when the Shares are disposed of by the optionee. If the Section 83(b)
election is made, the optionee’s capital gains holding period begins on the date
of exercise.
An
optionee’s tax basis in the Shares received on exercise of a Nonstatutory Option
will be equal to the amount of consideration paid by the optionee on exercise,
plus the amount of ordinary income recognized as a result of the receipt of such
Shares. The Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax
purposes at the same time and in the same amount as the optionee recognizes
taxable income.
If an
optionee exercises a Nonstatutory Option by delivering other Shares of the
Company, the optionee will not recognize gain or loss with respect to the Shares
delivered by the optionee, even if the then fair market value of such Shares is
different from the optionee’s tax basis therein. The portion of the Shares
received equal in number to the Shares surrendered will have a basis equal to
the basis of the Shares surrendered, and the holding period for such number of
Shares received will include the holding period of the Shares surrendered. The
remaining portion of the Shares received will be taxable to the employee as
ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to the fair market value of such
Shares as of the exercise date, and the Company likewise generally will be
entitled to an equivalent tax deduction. The participant’s tax basis in the
Shares received in excess of the number of Shares surrendered will equal the
amount of ordinary compensation income recognized by the employee, and the
holding period for such number of Shares received begins on the date such Shares
are acquired.
Restricted
Stock. The
Participant will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of Restricted Stock
because the Restricted Stock will be nontransferable and subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture. The Participant will recognize ordinary income
at the time at which the restrictions that impose a substantial risk of
forfeiture of such Shares (the “Restrictions”) lapse, in an amount equal to the
fair market value of such Shares at such time. The ordinary income recognized by
a Participant with respect to Shares awarded pursuant to the 1998 Plan will be
deemed compensation income subject to applicable wage withholding.
A
Participant may elect, pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, to include in
gross income the fair market value of the Restricted Stock upon grant,
notwithstanding that the Restricted Stock would otherwise not be includable in
gross income at that time. If such election is made within 30 days of the
date of grant, then the Participant would include in gross income the fair
market value of the Restricted Stock on the date of grant, and any change in the
value of the Shares after the date of grant would be capital gain or capital
loss only if and when the Shares are disposed of by the Participant. If the
Section 83(b) election is made, the Participant’s capital gains holding period
begins on the date of grant.
If a
Section 83(b) election is made and the Participant then forfeits the Restricted
Stock, the Participant may not deduct as a loss the amount previously included
in gross income.
Dividends
received on the Shares when the Restrictions on such Shares lapse will be
treated as additional compensation, and not dividend income, for federal income
tax purposes and will be subject to applicable wage withholding.
A
Participant’s tax basis in Shares of Restricted Stock received pursuant to the
1998 Plan will be equal to the ordinary income recognized by such Participant.
Unless a Section 83(b) election is made, the Participant’s holding period for
such Shares for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent sale will
begin on the date the Restrictions on such Shares lapse.
In
general, the Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax
purposes at the same time and in an amount equal to the ordinary income
recognized by a Participant with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock awarded
pursuant to the 1998 Plan.
If,
subsequent to the lapse of Restrictions on Shares, the Participant sells such
Shares, the difference, if any, between the amount realized from such sale and
the tax basis of such Shares to the Participant will be taxed as long-term or
short-term capital gain or loss depending on whether the Participant’s holding
period for such Shares exceeds the applicable holding period at the time of
sale.
THE
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES SET FORTH ABOVE IS FOR GENERAL
INFORMATION ONLY AND MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO ALL
INDIVIDUALS. PARTICIPANTS
SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS FOR A DETERMINATION AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX
CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO THEM.
IMPACT
OF ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R
“Share-Based Payment” which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees”. The statement addresses the accounting for
share-based payment transactions (for example, stock options and awards of
restricted stock) in which an employer receives employee-services in exchange
for equity securities of the Company or liabilities that are based on the fair
value of the Company’s equity securities. The statement eliminates the use of
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and generally
requires such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and
recording compensation expense rather than an optional pro-forma disclosure of
what expense amounts might be. The provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for
public companies with annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 14,
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission delayed the effective date of SFAS
123R so that if will not become effective for the Company until March 1, 2006.
We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 123R, and expect that the
compensation expense we will record beginning with our first fiscal quarter in
2007 will not materially vary in magnitude or trend from the pro-forma
compensation that we have reported under the standard presently in effect.
SHAREHOLDER
APPROVAL
The
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is
required to approve the amendments to the 1998 Plan described in this Proposal
2. If the Company’s shareholders do not approve the amendments described in this
Proposal 2, the 1998 Plan, as previously approved, will continue in effect until
all shares issuable are granted, or the plan terminates.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
THIS PROPOSAL. WE FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT A BROAD-BASED STOCK OPTION PROGRAM IS A
NECESSARY AND POWERFUL EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE THAT ALLOWS THE COMPANY TO ATTRACT,
RETAIN AND REWARD A HIGHLY QUALIFIED MANAGEMENT TEAM.
PROPOSAL
3: AMENDMENT TO BYE-LAWS
We
have been advised by our legal counsel that it is advisable to modernize our
Company’s Bye-laws to allow for notice of and voting by directors and
shareholders at meetings by electronic or other means. When our Bye-laws were
first adopted in 1993 the use of the Internet and other electronic means for
communicating among directors and shareholders was not common practice. Our
Bye-laws do not currently provide for this form of communication. The Board of
Directors believe it will help the Company reduce printing and mailing costs,
and encourage greater shareholder participation in votes by making voting more
convenient. Consequently, the Board of Directors is recommending amendments to
the Company’s Bye-laws. The relevant Sections of the Bye-laws and the amended
text are shown below with additions to the existing Bye-laws shown with
underlining:
|
1. |
Interpretation |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Expressions
referring to writing or written shall, unless the contrary intention
appears, include facsimile, printing, lithography, photography,
electronic transmission and
other modes of representing words in a visible form. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
For
purposes of these Bye-laws, "electronic transmission" means any form of
communication, not directly involving the physical transmission of paper,
that creates a record that may be retained, retrieved and reviewed by a
recipient thereof, and that may be directly reproduced in paper form by
such a recipient through an automated
process. |
|
|
|
|
17. |
Notice
of meetings of the Board |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
A
Director may, and the Secretary on the requisition of a Director shall, at
any time summon a meeting of the Board. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Notice
of a meeting of the Board shall be deemed to be duly given to a Director
if it is given to such Director verbally in person -or by telephone or
otherwise communicated or sent to such Director by post, cable, telex,
telecopier, facsimile,
electronic transmission
or other mode of representing words in a legible and non-transitory form
at such Director's last known address or any other address given by such
Director to the Company for this purpose. |
The
instrument appointing a proxy shall be (a)
in
writing in the form, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, of Form "A" in
the Schedule hereto, under the hand of the appointor or of the appointor's
attorney duly authorised in writing, or if the appointor is a corporation,
either under its seal, or under the hand of a duly authorised officer or
attorney or
(b) such telephonic, electronic transmission or other means as may be approved
by the Board from time to time.
The decision of the chairman of any general meeting as to the validity of any
instrument of proxy shall be final.
78. Notices
to Members of the Company
A
notice may be given by the Company to any Member either by delivering it to such
Member in person or by sending it to such Member's address in the Register of
Members or to such other address given for the purpose. For the purposes of this
Bye-law, a notice may be sent by mail, courier service, cable, telex,
telecopier, facsimile, electronic
transmission
or other mode of representing words in a legible and non-transitory
form.
80. Service
and delivery of notice
Any
notice shall be deemed to have been served at the time when the same would be
delivered in the ordinary course of transmission and, in proving such service,
it shall be sufficient to prove that the notice was properly addressed and
prepaid, if posted, and the time when it was posted, delivered to the courier or
to the cable company or transmitted by telex, facsimile,
electronic transmission
or other method as the case may be.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
THIS PROPOSAL
4:
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Under
Bermuda law, our shareholders have the responsibility to appoint the independent
auditors of the Company to hold office until the close of the next annual
general meeting and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
to set the auditor’ remuneration. KPMG LLP, or a predecessor, has been our
independent auditors since 1978, and is considered by management to be well
qualified and independent. Among other matters, the Audit Committee has
concluded that current requirements for audit partner rotation, auditor
independence through limitation of services and other regulations affecting the
audit engagement process will substantially assist in supporting auditor
independence.
Representatives
of KPMG LLP attended seven of the meetings held by the Audit Committee in fiscal
2005. The Audit Committee pre-approves and reviews audit and non-audit services
performed by KPMG LLP as well as the fees charged by them for such services. In
its pre-approval and review of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee
considers, among other factors, the possible effect of the performance of such
services on the auditors’ independence. To avoid certain potential conflicts of
interest in maintaining auditor independence, the law prohibits a publicly
traded company from obtaining certain non-audit services from its auditing firm.
In recent years, we have not obtained any of these prohibited services from KPMG
LLP, and we are able to obtain such services from other Accounting firms and
other service providers of requisite capability.
In
addition to the services provided by KPMG LLP, we principally used
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC LLP") to provide project direction and
management consulting services in connection with our implementation of a new
Global Enterprise Resource Planning System. In the aggregate, we paid PwC LLP
$555,700 in fiscal 2005 in connection with these services. We anticipate we will
continue to pay PwC LLP amounts for services of this nature in fiscal 2006.
SHAREHOLDER
APPROVAL
The
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is
required to appoint KPMG LLP as independent auditors as described in this
Proposal 4.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
THIS PROPOSAL.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Shareholders
intending to present proposals at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
desiring to have those proposals included in the Company's proxy statement and
form of proxy relating to that meeting must submit such proposals, in compliance
with Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be
received at the executive offices of the Company no later than February
7, 2006.
For proposals that shareholders intend to present at the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, unless the shareholder notifies the Company of such intent
by February 7, 2006, any proxy solicited by the Company for such Annual Meeting
will confer on the holder of the proxy discretionary authority to vote on the
proposal so long as such proposal is properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
RELATIONSHIP
WITH INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
KPMG
LLP has served as independent public accountants for the Company since 1978. A
representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with
the opportunity to make a statement if such representative desires to do so. The
KPMG LLP representative is also expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
SECTION
16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's
Directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a
registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Directors,
executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such
reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other
reports were required, during fiscal 2005 all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to the Directors, executive officers and greater than 10%
shareholders were satisfied.
QUORUM;
VOTING
The
presence in person of two or more persons, representing throughout the Annual
Meeting, in person or by proxy, at least a majority of the issued Common Shares
entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether
a quorum is present. If a quorum is present, the nine nominees for Directors
receiving a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by
proxy shall be elected. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast
at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy shall be the act of the shareholders
with respect to Proposals 2, 3 and 4. If within half an hour from the time
appointed for the Annual Meeting a quorum is not present or represented by
proxy, the Annual Meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later,
at the same time and place or to such other day, time or place the Board of
Directors may determine, provided that at least two persons are present at such
adjourned meeting, representing throughout the meeting, in person or by proxy,
at least a majority of the issued Common Shares entitled to vote. At any such
adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may
be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as
originally called. Broker non-votes are shares held by a broker or nominee that
are represented at the Annual Meeting, but with respect to which such broker or
nominee is not empowered to vote on a particular proposal. Such broker non-votes
will be counted towards a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not
counted in determining the total number of votes cast and will have no effect
with respect to Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4.
OTHER
MATTERS
Except
as described in this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors knows of no other
matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters properly come
before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the holders of the proxies
are authorized to vote on these matters in accordance with management's
discretion.
HOUSEHOLDING
OF MATERIALS
Some
banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the
practice of "householding" proxy statements and annual reports. This means that
only one copy of the Company's proxy statement or annual report may have been
sent to multiple shareholders in the same household. The Company will promptly
deliver a separate copy of either document to any shareholder upon request by
writing the Company at the following address: Helen of Troy Limited, 1 Helen of
Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas 79912, Attention: Investor Relations; or by calling
the Company at the following phone number: (915) 225-4748. Any shareholder who
wants to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the
future, or who is currently receiving multiple copies and would like to receive
only one copy for his or her household, should contact his or her bank, broker,
or other nominee record holder, or contact the Company at the above address and
phone number.
COMMUNICATING
WITH HELEN OF TROY
From
time to time, we receive calls from shareholders asking how they can communicate
with Helen of Troy. The following communication options are available.
|
1.
|
Our
main Internet website, located at www.hotus.com
contains product and marketing data as well as job listings. Our Investor
Relations site can also be accessed from this webpage and contains Company
press releases, earnings releases, financial information and stock quotes,
as well as corporate governance information and links to our SEC filings.
This proxy statement and our 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders are both
available at this site. Information about OXO international products can
be found at www.oxo.com
and information about our BRUT® line of products can be found at
www.brutworld.com. |
|
2.
|
Call
Helen of Troy Investor Relations, Robert D. Spear, at (915) 225-4748, or
e-mail us at rspear@hotus.com,
or send written correspondence to Helen of Troy, Attn: Investor Relations,
One Helen of Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas
79912. |
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
APPENDIX
A
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
1998
STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
SECTION
1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
This Plan
is established (i) to offer selected Employees of the Company or its
Subsidiaries an equity ownership interest in the financial success of the
Company, (ii) to provide the Company an opportunity to attract and retain
the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, and
(iii) to encourage equity participation in the Company by eligible Participants.
This Plan provides for the grant by the Company of (i) Options to purchase
Shares, and (ii) shares of Restricted Stock. Options granted under this
Plan may include nonstatutory options as well as ISOs intended to qualify under
section 422 of the Code.
SECTION
2. DEFINITIONS
“BOARD
OF DIRECTORS” shall
mean the board of directors of the Company, as duly elected from time to time.
“CHANGE
IN CONTROL” shall
mean to have occurred at such time as either (i) any “person”, as such term
is used in section 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than the Company, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company or any employee benefit plan of the
Company, or its Subsidiaries, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined
in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act (or any successor rule)), directly or
indirectly, of fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the
Company’s common stock, or (ii) individuals who constitute the Board of
Directors on the effective date of this Plan (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for
any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any person
becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination
for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least
three quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board (either by a
specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such
person is named as a nominee for the director without objection to such
nomination) shall be, for purposes of this clause (ii) considered as though
such person was a member of the Incumbent Board.
“CODE” shall
mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and as interpreted by the
regulations thereunder.
“COMMITTEE” shall
mean the Stock Option and Compensation Committee of the Company, or such other
Committee as may be appointed by the Board of Directors from time to time.
“COMPANY” shall
mean Helen of Troy Limited, a Bermuda company.
“CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION” shall
mean all knowledge and information pertaining to the business of the Company and
its Subsidiaries obtained by a Participant from any source whatever as a result
of his or her Services to the Company and/or its Subsidiaries and which is not a
matter of public knowledge, including, without limitation, any confidential
records, documents, contracts, customer lists, writings, data or other
information, whether or not the same is in written or other recorded form.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Confidential Information shall
be deemed to include any information or knowledge which may now or hereafter be
deemed a trade secret of the Company and/or its Subsidiaries or information
which relates to the Company’s and/or its Subsidiaries’ personnel; present
operations or future planning with respect to suppliers or customers, the
contents of any Company or Subsidiary manual, practice or procedure, operating,
revenue, expense or other statistics; private or public debt or equity financing
or concerning any banking, accounting or financial matters; current or future
advertising or promotion plans or programs; applications to or matters pending
or under the jurisdiction of any regulatory agency or court, including those
that are only threatened; any system, program, procedure or administrative
operations, including those pertaining to any matter relative to computer
operations of any type; information of the type mentioned above or of any other
type regarding affiliates of the Company; present or future plans for the
extension of the present business or the commencement of new business by the
Company and/or its Subsidiaries.
“DATE
OF GRANT” shall
mean the date on which the Committee resolves to grant an Option to an Optionee
or grant Restricted Stock to a Participant, as the case may be.
“DISINTERESTED
DIRECTOR” shall
mean a member of the Board of Directors who is both (a) a Non-Employee
Director, within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange
Act and (b) an Outside Director, within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Code.
“EMPLOYEE” shall
include every individual performing Services to the Company or its Subsidiaries
if the relationship between such individual and the Company or its Subsidiaries
is the legal relationship of employer and employee. This definition of
“Employee” is qualified in its entirety and is subject to the definition set
forth in section 3401(c) of the Code and the regulations thereunder.
“EXCHANGE
ACT” shall
mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as interpreted by the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“EXERCISE
PRICE” shall
mean the amount for which one Share may be purchased upon exercise of an Option,
as specified by the Committee in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, but in
no event less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to such
Option on the Date of Grant.
“FAIR
MARKET VALUE” shall
mean such amount as the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, shall
determine; provided, however, that if there is a public market for the
securities, the Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the highest and lowest
sale prices of the securities per share or unit, as the case may be, as reported
in the Wall Street Journal (or, if not so reported, as otherwise reported by the
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System) as of the
date in question or, in the event the securities are listed on a stock exchange,
the Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the highest and lowest sale prices of
the securities per share or unit, as the case may be, on such exchange, as
reported in the Wall Street Journal, as of the date in question.
“ISO” shall
mean a stock option which is granted to an individual and which meets the
requirements of section 422(b) of the Code, pursuant to which the Optionee has
no tax consequences resulting from the grant or, subject to certain holding
period requirements, exercise of the option and the employer is not entitled to
a business expense deduction with respect thereto.
“NONSTATUTORY
OPTION” shall
mean any Option granted by the Committee that does not meet the requirements of
sections 421 through 424 of the Code, as amended.
“OPTION” shall
mean either an ISO or Nonstatutory Option, as the context requires.
“OPTIONEE” shall
mean a Participant who holds an Option.
“PARTICIPANTS” shall
mean those individuals described in Section 1 of this Plan selected by the
Committee who are eligible under Section 4 of this Plan for grants of
either Options or Restricted Stock under this Plan. Effective August 2, 2005,
Gerald J. Rubin, the Company's Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President and Christopher L. Carameros, Executive Vice President, will be
excluded from any future grants under this Plan.
“PERFORMANCE
GOALS” shall
have that meaning set forth in Section 3(c)(xii) of this Plan.
“PERMANENT
AND TOTAL DISABILITY” shall
mean that an individual is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity
by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can
be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last
for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months. An individual
shall not be considered to suffer from Permanent and Total Disability unless
such individual furnishes proof of the existence thereof in such form and
manner, and at such times, as the Committee may reasonably require. The scope of
this definition shall automatically be reduced or expanded to the extent that
section 22(e)(3) of the Code is amended to reduce or expand the scope of the
definition of Permanent and Total Disability thereunder.
“PLAN” shall
mean this Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended from time to time.
“PLAN
AWARD” shall
mean the grant of either an Option or Restricted Stock, as the context requires.
“RESTRICTED
STOCK” shall
have that meaning set forth in Section 7(a) of this Plan.
“RESTRICTED
STOCK ACCOUNT” shall
have that meaning set forth in Section 7(a)(ii) of this Plan.
“RESTRICTED
STOCK CRITERIA” shall
have that meaning in Section 7(a)(iv) of this Plan.
“RESTRICTION
PERIOD” shall
have that meaning in Section 7(a)(iii) of this Plan.
“SERVICES” shall
mean services rendered to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as an Employee.
“SHARE” shall
mean one share of Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 9 of this
Plan (if applicable).
“STOCK” shall
mean the common stock of the Company, par value $.10 per share.
“STOCK
OPTION AGREEMENT” shall
mean the agreement executed between the Company and an Optionee that contains
the terms, conditions and restrictions pertaining to the granting of an Option.
“SUBSIDIARY” shall
mean any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity as
to which more than fifty (50%) percent of the outstanding voting stock, shares
or equity interests shall now or hereafter be owned or controlled, directly by a
person, any Subsidiary of such person, or any Subsidiary of such Subsidiary.
“TEN-PERCENT
SHAREHOLDER” shall
mean a person that owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting
power of all classes of outstanding stock of the Company or any Subsidiary,
taking into account the attribution rules set forth in section 424 of the Code,
as amended. For purposes of this definition of “Ten Percent Shareholder” the
term “outstanding stock” shall include all stock actually issued and outstanding
immediately after the grant of an Option to an Optionee. “Outstanding stock”
shall not include reacquired shares or shares authorized for issuance under
outstanding Options held by the Optionee or by any other person.
“VEST
DATE” shall
have that meaning in Section 7(a)(v) of this Plan.
SECTION
3. ADMINISTRATION
(a) GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION. This
Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall consist of at least two
persons, each of whom shall be Disinterested Directors. The members of the
Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors for such terms as the
Board of Directors may determine. The Board of Directors may from time to time
remove members from, or add members to, the Committee. Vacancies on the
Committee, however caused, may be filled by the Board of Directors.
(b) COMMITTEE
PROCEDURES. The
Board of Directors shall designate one of the members of the Committee as
chairman. The Committee may hold meetings at such times and places as it shall
determine. The acts of a majority of the Committee members present at meetings
at which a quorum exists, or acts reduced to or approved in writing by a
majority of all Committee members, shall be valid acts of the Committee. A
majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.
(c) AUTHORITY
OF COMMITTEE. This
Plan shall be administered by, or under the direction of, the Committee
constituted in such a manner as to comply at all times with Rule 16b-3 (or
any successor rule) under the Exchange Act. The Committee shall administer this
Plan so as to comply at all times with the Exchange Act and, subject to the
Code, shall otherwise have absolute and final authority to interpret this Plan
and to make all determinations specified in or permitted by this Plan or deemed
necessary or desirable for its administration or for the conduct of the
Committee’s business including without limitation the authority to take the
following actions:
(i) To
interpret this Plan and to apply its provisions;
(ii) To
adopt, amend or rescind rules, procedures and forms relating to this Plan;
(iii) To
authorize any person to execute, on behalf of the Company, any instrument
required to carry out the purposes of this Plan;
(iv) To
determine when Plan Awards are to be granted under this Plan;
(v) To
select the Optionees and Participants;
(vi) To
determine the number of Shares to be made subject to each Plan Award;
(vii) To
prescribe the terms, conditions and restrictions of each Plan Award, including
without limitation the Exercise Price and the determination whether an Option is
to be classified as an ISO or a Nonstatutory Option;
(viii) To
amend any outstanding Stock Option Agreement (other than the Exercise Price) or
the terms, conditions and restrictions of a grant of Restricted Stock, subject
to Section 6(f) and applicable legal restrictions and the consent of the
Optionee or Participant, as the case may be, who entered into such agreement;
(ix) To
establish procedures so that an Optionee may obtain a loan through a registered
broker-dealer under the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, for
the purpose of exercising an Option;
(x) To
establish procedures for an Optionee (1) to have withheld from the total
number of Shares to be acquired upon the exercise of an Option that number of
Shares having a Fair Market Value, which, together with such cash as shall be
paid in respect of fractional shares, shall equal the Exercise Price, and (2) to
exercise a portion of an Option by delivering that number of Shares already
owned by an Optionee having a Fair Market Value which shall equal the partial
Exercise Price and to deliver the Shares thus acquired by such Optionee in
payment of Shares to be received pursuant to the exercise of additional portions
of the Option, the effect of which shall be that an Optionee can in sequence
utilize such newly acquired shares in payment of the Exercise Price of the
entire Option, together with such cash as shall be paid in respect of fractional
shares;
(xi) To
establish procedures whereby a number of Shares may be withheld from the total
number of Shares to be issued upon exercise of an Option, to meet the obligation
of withholding for federal and state income and other taxes, if any, incurred by
the Optionee upon such exercise;
(xii) To
establish performance goals (“Performance Goals”) in connection with any grant
of Restricted Stock, which Performance Goals may be based on earnings, cash
flow, stock price, return on capital, operating margins, general and
administrative expenses, safety or refinements of these measures; provided that
in any case, the Performance Goals may be based on either a single period or
cumulative results, aggregate or per share data or results computed
independently or with respect to a peer group; and
(xiii) To
take any other actions deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of
this Plan.
All
interpretations and determinations of the Committee made with respect to the
granting of Plan Awards shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all
interested parties. The Committee may make grants of Plan Awards on an
individual or group basis. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any
action that is taken or is omitted to be taken if such action or omission is
taken in good faith with respect to this Plan or grant of any Plan Award.
(d) HOLDING
PERIOD. The
Committee may in its sole discretion require as a condition to the granting of
any Option, that a Participant hold the Option for a period of six months
following the date of such acquisition; provided that this condition shall be
satisfied if at least six months elapse from the date of acquisition of the
Option to the date of disposition of the Option (other than upon exercise or
conversion) or its underlying equity security. The Committee shall require as a
condition to the awarding of any Restricted Stock, that a Participant hold the
Restricted Stock for a period of (i) one year following the date of such
acquisition in the event such Restricted Stock award vests upon the achievement
of Performance Goals or (ii) three years following the date of such
acquisition in the event such Restricted Stock award does not vest upon the
achievement of Performance Goals.
SECTION
4. ELIGIBILITY
(a) GENERAL
RULE. Subject
to the limitations set forth in subsection (b) below or elsewhere in this Plan,
Participants shall be eligible to participate in this Plan.
(b) NON-EMPLOYEE
INELIGIBLE FOR ISOS. In no
event shall an ISO be granted to any individual who is not an Employee on the
Date of Grant.
SECTION
5. SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN
(a) BASIC
LIMITATION. Shares
offered under this Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares that
have been reacquired by the Company. The aggregate number of Shares that are
available for issuance under this Plan shall not exceed six million seven
hundred and fifty thousand (6,750,000) Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to
Section 9 of this Plan; provided that no more than six hundred thousand
(600,000) Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 9 of this Plan,
may be issued under this Plan in connection with grants of Restricted Stock; and
provided further that effective August 2, 2005, each Share of Restricted Stock
granted pursuant to this Plan shall reduce the available Shares subject to this
Plan by three Shares. No more than two hundred and fifty thousand (250,000)
Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 9 of this Plan, may be issued
under this Plan in any fiscal year of the Company. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, in the event that in any fiscal year less than two hundred and fifty
thousand (250,000) Shares are issued under the Plan then the amount of Shares
that can be issued in any future fiscal year shall be increased by the excess of
two hundred and fifty thousand (250,000) over the amount of Shares actually
issued in such year until such excess number of Shares have been issued. In
addition, Shares available for issuance under Section 5 (b) shall also be
available for issuance in any fiscal year until such Shares have been issued.
The Committee shall not issue more Shares than are available for issuance under
this Plan. The number of Shares that are subject to unexercised Options at any
time under this Plan shall not exceed the number of Shares that remain available
for issuance under this Plan. The Company, during the term of this Plan, shall
at all times reserve and keep available sufficient Shares to satisfy the
requirements of this Plan.
(b) ADDITIONAL
SHARES. In the
event any outstanding Option for any reason expires, is canceled or otherwise
terminates, the Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option shall
again be available for issuance under this Plan. In the event that Shares issued
under this Plan revert to the Company prior to the Vest Date under a grant of
Restricted Stock, such Shares shall again be available for issuance under this
Plan.
SECTION
6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS
(a) TERM
OF OPTION. The
term of each Option shall be ten (10) years from the Date of Grant or such
shorter term as may be determined by the Committee; provided, however, in the
case of an ISO granted to a Ten-Percent Shareholder, the term of such ISO shall
be five (5) years from the Date of Grant or such shorter time as may be
determined by the Committee.
(b) EXERCISE
PRICE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(i) EXERCISE
PRICE. The
Exercise Price shall be such price as is determined by the Committee in its sole
discretion and set forth in the Stock Option Agreement; provided, however, the
Exercise Price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the
Shares subject to such option on the Date of Grant (or 110% in the case of an
ISO granted to a Participant who is a Ten-Percent Shareholder on the Date of
Grant).
(ii) PAYMENT
OF SHARES. Payment
for the Shares upon exercise of an Option shall be made in cash, by certified
check, or if authorized by the Committee, by delivery of other Shares having a
Fair Market Value on the date of delivery equal to the aggregate exercise price
of the Shares as to which said Option is being exercised, or by any combination
of such methods of payment or by any other method of payment as may be permitted
under applicable law and this Plan and authorized by the Committee under Section
3(c) of this Plan.
(c) EXERCISE
OF OPTION.
(i) PROCEDURE
FOR EXERCISE; RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDER. Any
Option granted hereunder shall be exercisable at such times under such
conditions as shall be determined by the Committee, including without limitation
performance criteria with respect to the Company and/or the Optionee, and in
accordance with the terms of this Plan.
An Option
may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share.
An Option
shall be deemed to be exercised when written notice of such exercise has been
given to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Stock Option Agreement
by the Optionee entitled to exercise the Option and full payment for the Shares
with respect to which the Option is exercised has been received by the Company.
Full payment may, as authorized by the Committee, consist of any form of
consideration and method of payment allowable under Section 6(b)(ii) of
this Plan. Upon the receipt of notice of exercise and full payment for the
Shares, the Shares shall be deemed to have been issued and the Optionee shall be
entitled to receive such Shares and shall be a shareholder with respect to such
Shares, and the Shares shall be considered fully paid and nonassessable. No
adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date
is prior to the date on which the stock certificate is issued, except as
provided in Section 9 of this Plan.
Each
exercise of an Option shall reduce, by an equal number, the total number of
Shares that may thereafter be purchased under such Option.
(ii) TERMINATION
OF STATUS AS AN EMPLOYEE. Except
as provided in Subsections 6(c)(iii) and 6(c)(iv) below, an Optionee holding an
Option who ceases to be an Employee of the Company may, but only until the
earlier of the date (x) the Option held by the Optionee expires, or
(y) thirty (30) days after the date such Optionee ceases to be an
Employee, exercise the Option to the extent that the Optionee was entitled to
exercise it on such date; provided, however, that in the event the Optionee is
an Employee and is terminated without cause (as determined in the sole
discretion of the Committee) then the thirty (30) day period described in
this sentence shall be automatically extended to ninety (90) days (and in
the case of a Nonstatutory Option, such period shall be automatically extended
to six (6) months), unless the Committee further extends such period in its
sole discretion. To the extent that the Optionee was not entitled to exercise an
Option on such date, or if the Optionee does not exercise it within the time
specified herein, such Option shall terminate. The Committee shall have the
authority to determine the date an Optionee ceases to be an Employee.
(iii) PERMANENT
AND TOTAL DISABILITY.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6(c)(ii) above, in the event an
Optionee is unable to continue to perform Services for the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries as a result of such Optionee’s Permanent and Total Disability (and,
for ISOs, at the time such Permanent and Total Disability begins, the Optionee
was an Employee and had been an Employee since the Date of Grant), such Optionee
may exercise an Option in whole or in part notwithstanding that such Option may
not be fully exercisable, but only until the earlier of the date (x) the
Option held by the Optionee expires, or (y) twelve (12) months from
the date of termination of Services due to such Permanent and Total Disability.
To the extent the Optionee is not entitled to exercise an Option on such date or
if the Optionee does not exercise it within the time specified herein, such
Option shall terminate.
(iv) DEATH
OF AN OPTIONEE. Upon
the death of an Optionee, any Option held by an Optionee shall terminate and be
of no further effect; provided, however, notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 6(c)(ii) above, in the event an Optionee’s death occurs during the
term of an Option held by such Optionee and, at the time of death, the Optionee
was an Employee (and, for ISOs, at the time of death, the Optionee was an
Employee and had been an Employee since the Date of Grant), the Option may be
exercised in whole or in part notwithstanding that such Option may not have been
fully exercisable on the date of the Optionee’s death, but only until the
earlier of the date (x) the Option held by the Optionee expires, or
(y) twelve (12) months from the date of the Optionee’s death, by the
Optionee’s estate or by a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option
by bequest or inheritance. To the extent the Option is not entitled to be
exercised on such date or if the Option is not exercised within the time
specified herein, such Option shall terminate.
(d) NON-TRANSFERABILITY
OF OPTIONS. Except
as may be permitted by the Committee in its sole discretion, any Option granted
under this Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or
disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by
the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or the rules
thereunder, and is not assignable by operation of law or subject to execution,
attachment or similar process. Any Option granted under this Plan can only be
exercised during the Optionee’s lifetime by such Optionee. Any attempted sale,
pledge, assignment, hypothecation or other transfer of the Option contrary to
the provisions hereof and the levy of any execution, attachment or similar
process upon the Option shall be null and void and without force or effect. No
transfer of the Option by will or by the laws of descent and distribution shall
be effective to bind the Company unless the Company shall have been furnished
written notice thereof and an authenticated copy of the will and/or such other
evidence as the Committee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the
transfer and the acceptance by the transferee or transferees of the terms and
conditions of the Option. The terms of any Option transferred by will or by the
laws of descent and distribution shall be binding upon the executors,
administrators, heirs and successors of Optionee.
(e) TIME
OF GRANTING OPTIONS. Any
Option granted hereunder shall be deemed to be granted on the Date of Grant.
Written notice of the Committee’s determination to grant an Option to an
Employee, evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement, dated as of the Date of Grant,
shall be given to such Employee within a reasonable time after the Date of
Grant.
(f) RESTRICTION
ON REPRICING. The
Exercise Price of outstanding Options may not be altered or amended, except with
respect to adjustments for changes in capitalization as provided in
Section 9(a). Within the limitations of this Plan, the Committee may
otherwise modify outstanding Options, provided that no modification of an Option
shall, without the consent of the Optionee, alter or impair the Optionee’s
rights or obligations under such Option. The foregoing notwithstanding, the
Committee may, in its sole discretion, and without the consent of the Optionee
or any other person, accelerate the vesting of all or part of any Option.
(g) RESTRICTIONS
ON TRANSFER OF SHARES. Any
Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be subject to such rights of
repurchase and other transfer restrictions as the Committee may determine in its
sole discretion. Such restrictions shall be set forth in the applicable Stock
Option Agreement.
(h) SPECIAL
LIMITATION ON ISOS. To the
extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined on the Date of Grant) of
the Shares with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by an
individual during any calendar year under this Plan, and under all other plans
maintained by the Company, exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as
Options that are not ISOs.
(i) LEAVES
OF ABSENCE. Leaves
of absence approved by the Committee which conform to the policies of the
Company shall not be considered termination of employment if the
employer-employee relationship as defined under the Code or the regulations
promulgated thereunder otherwise exists.
(j) LIMITATION
ON GRANTS OF OPTIONS TO COVERED EMPLOYEES. Subject
to potential changes specified in Section 9(a) the total number of Shares for
which Options may be granted and which may be awarded as Restricted Stock to any
“covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code during any
one (1) year period shall not exceed 250,000 in the aggregate.
(k) DISQUALIFYING
DISPOSITIONS. The
Stock Option Agreement evidencing any ISO granted under this Plan shall provide
that if the Optionee makes a disposition, within the meaning of Section 424(c)
of the Code, of any share or shares issued to him pursuant to the exercise of
the ISO within the two (2) year period commencing on the day after the Date
of Grant of such Option or within the one (1) year period commencing on the
day after the date of transfer of the share or shares to him pursuant to the
exercise of such Option, he shall, within ten (10) days of such
disposition, notify the Company thereof and immediately deliver to the Company
any amount of federal income tax withholding required by law.
SECTION
7. RESTRICTED STOCK
(a) AUTHORITY
TO GRANT RESTRICTED STOCK. The
Committee shall have the authority to grant to Participants Shares that are
subject to certain terms, conditions and restrictions (the “Restricted Stock”).
The Restricted Stock may be granted by the Committee either separately or in
combination with Options. The terms, conditions and restrictions of the
Restricted Stock shall be determined from time to time by the Committee without
limitation, except as otherwise provided in this Plan; provided, however, that
each grant of Restricted Stock shall require the Participant to remain an
Employee of (or otherwise provide Services to) the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries for at least six (6) months from the Date of Grant. The
granting, vesting and issuing of the Restricted Stock shall also be subject to
the following provisions:
(i) NATURE
OF GRANT.
Restricted Stock shall be granted to Participants for Services rendered and at
no additional cost to Participant; provided, however, that the value of the
Services performed must, in the opinion of the Committee, equal or exceed the
par value of the Restricted Stock to be granted to the Participant.
(ii) RESTRICTED
STOCK ACCOUNT. The
Company shall establish a restricted stock account (the “Restricted Stock
Account”) for each Participant to which Restricted Stock is granted, and such
Restricted Stock shall be credited to such account. No certificates will be
issued to the Participant with respect to the Restricted Stock until the Vest
Date as provided herein. Every credit of Restricted Stock under this Plan to a
Restricted Stock Account shall be considered “contingent” and unfunded until the
Vest Date. Such contingent credits shall be considered bookkeeping entries only,
notwithstanding the “crediting” of “dividends” as provided herein. Such accounts
shall be subject to the general claims of the Company’s creditors. The
Participant’s rights to the Restricted Stock Account shall be no greater than
that of a general creditor of the Company. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed as creating a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Participants
and the Company, the Board of Directors or the Committee.
(iii) RESTRICTIONS. The
terms, conditions and restrictions of the Restricted Stock shall be determined
by the Committee on the Date of Grant. The Restricted Stock may not be sold,
assigned, transferred, redeemed, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the
period in which the terms, conditions and restrictions apply (the “Restriction
Period”). More than one grant of Restricted Stock may be outstanding at any one
time, and the Restriction Periods may be of different lengths. Receipt of the
Restricted Stock is conditioned upon satisfactory compliance with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Plan and those imposed by the Committee.
(iv) RESTRICTED
STOCK CRITERIA. At the
time of each grant of Restricted Stock, the Committee in its sole discretion may
establish certain criteria to determine the times at which restrictions placed
on Restricted Stock shall lapse (i.e., the termination of the Restriction
Period), which criteria may include without limitation performance measures and
targets (which may include any Performance Goals established by the Committee)
and/or holding period requirements (the “Restricted Stock Criteria”). The
Committee may establish a corresponding relationship between the Restricted
Stock Criteria and (x) the number of Shares of Restricted Stock that may be
earned, and (y) the extent to which the terms, conditions and restrictions
on the Restricted Stock shall lapse. Restricted Stock Criteria may vary among
grants of Restricted Stock; provided, however, that once the Restricted Stock
Criteria are established for a grant of Restricted Stock, the Restricted Stock
Criteria shall not be modified with respect to such grant.
(v) VESTING. On the
date the Restriction Period terminates, the Restricted Stock shall vest in the
Participant (the “Vest Date”), who may then require the Company to issue
certificates evidencing the Restricted Stock credited to the Restricted Stock
Account of such Participant.
(vi) DIVIDENDS. The
Committee may provide from time to time that amounts equivalent to dividends
shall be payable with respect to the Restricted Stock held in the Restricted
Stock Account of a Participant. Such amounts shall be credited to the Restricted
Stock Account and shall be payable to the Participant on the Vest Date.
(vii) TERMINATION
OF SERVICES. If a
Participant (x) with the consent of the Committee, ceases to be an Employee
of, or otherwise ceases to provide Services to, the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, or (y) dies or suffers from Permanent and Total Disability,
the vesting or forfeiture (including without limitation the terms, conditions
and restrictions) of any grant under this Section 7 shall be determined by
the Committee in its sole discretion, subject to any limitations or terms of
this Plan. If the Participant ceases to be an Employee of, or otherwise ceases
to provide Services to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for any other
reason, all grants of Restricted Stock under this Plan shall be forfeited
(subject to the terms of this Plan).
(b) DEFERRAL
OF PAYMENTS. The
Committee may establish procedures by which a Participant may elect to defer the
transfer of Restricted Stock to the Participant. The Committee shall determine
the terms and conditions of such deferral in its sole discretion.
SECTION
8. ISSUANCE OF SHARES; TAX WITHHOLDING
(a) ISSUANCE
OF SHARES. As a
condition to the transfer of any Shares issued under this Plan, the Company may
require an opinion of counsel, satisfactory to the Company, to the effect that
such transfer will not be in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or any other applicable securities laws, rules or regulations, or that
such transfer has been registered under federal and all applicable state
securities laws. The Company may refrain from delivering or transferring Shares
issued under this Plan until the Committee has determined that the Participant
has tendered to the Company any and all applicable federal, state or local tax
owed by the Participant as the result of the receipt of a Plan Award, the
vesting of a Plan Award, the exercise of an Option or the disposition of any
Shares issued under this Plan, in the event that the Company reasonably
determines that it might have a legal liability to satisfy such tax. The Company
shall not be liable to any person or entity for damages due to any delay in the
delivery or issuance of any stock certificate evidencing any Shares for any
reason whatsoever.
(b) TAX
WITHHOLDING. Each
Participant shall, no later than the date as of which the value of any Plan
Award or of any Shares or other amounts received thereunder first becomes
includable in the gross income of such Participant for federal income tax
purposes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Committee
regarding payment of, any federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required to
be withheld with respect to such income. The Company and its Subsidiaries shall,
to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any
payment of any kind otherwise due to the Participant. Subject to approval by the
Committee, a Participant may elect to have such tax withholding obligation
satisfied, in whole or in part, by (i) authorizing the Company to withhold
from Shares to be issued pursuant to any award, a number of Shares with an
aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date the withholding is effected) that
would satisfy the withholding amount due, or (ii) transferring to the
Company Shares owned by the Participant with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as
of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding
amount due.
SECTION
9. CAPITALIZATION ADJUSTMENTS; MERGER; CHANGE IN CONTROL
(a) ADJUSTMENTS
UPON CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION. Subject
to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of Shares
covered by each outstanding Option (as well as the Exercise Price covered by any
outstanding Option), the aggregate number of Shares that have been authorized
for issuance under this Plan and the number of Shares of Restricted Stock
credited to any Restricted Stock Account of a Participant, shall be
proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued
Shares resulting from a stock split, payment of a stock dividend with respect to
the Stock or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares
effected without receipt of consideration by the Company. Such adjustment shall
be made by the Committee in its sole discretion, which adjustment shall be
final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance
by the Company of shares of stock of any class shall affect, and no adjustment
by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of Shares
subject to an Option.
(b) DISSOLUTION,
LIQUIDATION, SALE OF ASSETS OR MERGER. In the
event of the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, other than pursuant to a
Reorganization (hereinafter defined), any Option granted under the Plan shall
terminate as of a date to be fixed by the Committee, provided that not less than
30 days written notice of the date so fixed shall be given to each Optionee
and each such Optionee shall have the right during such period to exercise his
Options as to all or any part of the Shares covered thereby including Shares as
to which such Options would not otherwise be exercisable by reason of an
insufficient lapse of time.
In the
event of a Reorganization in which the Company is not the surviving or acquiring
company, or in which the Company is or becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of
another company after the effective date of the Reorganization, then (i) if
there is no plan or agreement respecting the Reorganization (“Reorganization
Agreement”) or if the Reorganization Agreement does not specifically provide for
the change, conversion or exchange of the Shares under outstanding unexercised
Options for securities of another corporation, then the Committee shall take
such action, and the Options shall terminate, as provided above; or (ii) if
there is a Reorganization Agreement and if the Reorganization Agreement
specifically provides for the change, conversion or exchange of the shares under
outstanding or unexercised options for securities of another corporation, then
the Committee shall adjust the Shares under such outstanding unexercised Options
(and shall adjust the Shares which are then available to be optioned, if the
Reorganization Agreement makes specific provisions therefore) in a manner not
inconsistent with the provisions of the Reorganization Agreement for the
adjustment, change, conversion or exchange of such stock and such options.
The term
“Reorganization” as used in this Subsection 9(b) shall mean any statutory
merger, statutory consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets
of the Company, or sale, pursuant to an agreement with the Company, of
securities of the Company pursuant to which the Company is or becomes a
wholly-owned subsidiary of another company after the effective date of the
Reorganization.
Except as
provided above in this Section 9(b) and except as otherwise provided by the
Committee in its sole discretion, any Options shall terminate immediately prior
to the consummation of such proposed action.
(c) CHANGE
IN CONTROL. Subject
to Section 9(b), in the event there occurs a Change of Control,
(i) the Optionees shall have the right to exercise from and after the date
of the Change in Control the Option held by such Optionee in whole or in part,
notwithstanding that such Option may not be fully exercisable, and (ii) any
and all restrictions on any Restricted Stock credited to a Restricted Stock
Account shall lapse and such stock shall immediately vest in the Participants,
notwithstanding that the Restricted Stock held in such account was unvested.
SECTION
10. NO EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
No
provision of this Plan, under any Stock Option Agreement or under any grant of
Restricted Stock shall be construed to give any Participant any right to remain
an Employee of, or provide Services to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
or to affect the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s service at
any time, with or without cause.
SECTION
11. CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-COMPETITION
By
accepting Options or Restricted Stock under this Plan and as a condition to the
exercise of Options and the enjoyment of any of the benefits of this Plan, each
Participant agrees as follows:
(a) CONFIDENTIALITY. During
the period that each Participant provides Services (or the Participant’s
engaging in any other activity with or for the Company) and for a two year
period thereafter, such Participant shall treat and safeguard as confidential
and secret all Confidential Information received by such Participant at any
time. Without the prior written consent of the Company, except as required by
law, such Participant will not disclose or reveal any Confidential Information
to any third party whatsoever or use the same in any manner except in connection
with the businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries. In the event that a
Participant is requested or required (by oral questions, interrogatories,
requests for information or documents, subpoena, civil investigative demand or
other process) to disclose (i) any Confidential Information or
(ii) any information relating to his opinion, judgment or recommendations
concerning the Company or its Subsidiaries as developed from the Confidential
Information, each Participant will provide the Company with prompt written
notice of any such request or requirement so that the Company may seek an
appropriate protective order or waive compliance with the provisions contained
herein. If, failing the entry of a protective order or the receipt of a waiver
hereunder, such Participant is, in the reasonable opinion of his counsel,
compelled to disclose Confidential Information, such Participant shall disclose
only that portion and will exercise best efforts to obtain assurances that
confidential treatment will be accorded such Confidential Information.
(b) NON-COMPETITION. During
the period that each Participant provides Services to the Company or its
Subsidiaries, and for a two-year period thereafter, such Participant shall not,
without prior written consent of the Committee, do, directly or indirectly, any
of the following:
(i) own,
manage, control or participate in the ownership, management, or control of, or
be employed or engaged by or otherwise affiliated or associated with, any other
corporation, partnership, proprietorship, firm, association or other business
entity, or otherwise engage in any business which competes with the business of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (as such business is conducted during the
term such Participant provides Services to the Company or its Subsidiaries) in
the geographical regions in which such business is conducted; provided, however,
that the ownership of a maximum of one percent of the outstanding stock of any
publicly traded corporation shall not violate this covenant; or
(ii) employ,
solicit for employment or assist in employing or soliciting for employment any
present, former or future employee, officer or agent of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries.
In the
event any court of competent jurisdictions should determine that the foregoing
covenant of non-competition is not enforceable because of the extent of the
geographical area or the duration thereof, then the Company and the affected
Participant hereby petition such court to modify the foregoing covenant to the
extent, but only to the extent, necessary to create a covenant which is
enforceable in the opinion of such court, with the intention of the parties that
the Company shall be afforded the maximum enforceable covenant of
non-competition which may be available under the circumstances and applicable
law.
(c) FAILURE
TO COMPLY. Each
Participant acknowledges that remedies at law for any breach by him of this
Section 11 may be inadequate and that the damages resulting from any such
breach are not readily susceptible to being measured in monetary terms.
Accordingly, each Participant acknowledges that upon his or her violation of any
provision of this Section 11, the Company will be entitled to immediate
injunctive relief and may obtain an order restraining any threatened or future
breach. Each Participant further agrees, subject to the proviso at the end of
this sentence, that if he or she violates any provisions of this
Section 11, such Participant shall immediately forfeit any rights and
benefits under this Plan and shall return to the Company any unexercised Options
and forfeit the rights under any awards of Restricted Stock and shall return any
Shares held by such Participant received upon exercise of any Option or the
termination of the Restriction Period relating to Restricted Stock granted
hereunder, together with any proceeds from sales of any Shares received upon
exercise of such Options or the termination of the Restriction Period of such
Restricted Stock; provided, however, that upon violation of subsection
(b) of this Section 11, the forfeiture and return provisions contained
in this sentence shall apply only to Options which have become exercisable, and
Restricted Stock, the Restriction Period with respect to which has terminated,
and in any such case the proceeds of sales there from, during the two year
period immediately prior to termination of the Participant’s Services. Nothing
in this Section 11 will be deemed to limit, in any way, the remedies at law
or in equity of the Company, for a breach by a Participant of any of the
provisions of this Section 11.
(d) NOTICE. Each
Participant agrees to provide written notice of the provisions of this
Section 11 to any future employer of such Participant, and the Company
expressly reserves the right to provide such notice to such Participant’s future
employer(s).
(e) SEVERABILITY. If any
provisions or part of any provision of this Section 11 is held for any
reason to be unenforceable, (i) the remainder of this Section 11 shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect and (ii) such provision or
part shall be deemed to be amended in such manner as to render such provision
enforceable.
SECTION
12. TERM OF PLAN; EFFECT OF AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION
(a) EFFECTIVE
DATE; TERM OF PLAN. This
Plan shall be submitted to the shareholders of the Company for approval and
ratification at the next regular or special meeting thereof to be held after
August 1, 1998. Unless at such meeting this Plan is approved and ratified
by the shareholders of the Company in the manner provided by the Company’s
Bye-Laws, then, and in such event, this Plan and any then outstanding Options or
Incentive Stock that may have been conditionally granted prior to such
shareholder meeting shall become null and void and of no further force or
effect. Subject to the immediately preceding sentence, this Plan shall become
effective upon its adoption by the Board of Directors. This Plan shall continue
in effect for a term of ten (10) years unless sooner terminated under this
Section 12.
(b) AMENDMENT
AND TERMINATION. The
Board of Directors in its sole discretion may terminate this Plan at any time.
The Board of Directors may amend this Plan at any time in such respects as the
Board of Directors may deem advisable; provided, that (i) any change in the
aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under this Plan, other than in
connection with an adjustment under Section 9 of this Plan, or
(ii) any change in this Plan that would materially increase the benefits
accruing to Participants under this Plan, shall require approval of the
shareholders of the Company in the manner provided by the Company’s Bye-Laws, as
amended.
(c) EFFECT
OF TERMINATION. In the
event this Plan is terminated, no Shares shall be issued under this Plan nor
shall any Shares of Restricted Stock be credited to a Restricted Stock Account,
except upon exercise of an Option granted prior to such termination or issuance
of Shares of Restricted Stock previously credited to a Restricted Stock Account.
The termination of this Plan, or any amendment thereof, shall not affect any
Shares previously issued to a Participant, any Option previously granted under
this Plan or any Restricted Stock previously credited to a Restricted Stock
Account.
SECTION
13. GOVERNING LAW
THIS PLAN
AND ANY AND ALL STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE GRANT OF
RESTRICTED STOCK EXECUTED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PLAN SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND
CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT REGARD TO
CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES.
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
AUGUST 2,
2005
PROXY
PROXY
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
undersigned hereby authorizes each of Gerald J. Rubin and Vincent D. Carson as
Proxy with power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at
1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, at the Camino Real Hotel, 101 S. El Paso
Street, El Paso, Texas, and any adjournment thereof, and to vote all the shares
of Common Stock of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote on the
following matters:
1. To
set the number of director positions at nine and to elect a board of nine
directors:
FOR
ALL NOMINEES LISTED BELOW
(except
as marked to the contrary below) [ ]
WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY
to
vote for all nominees below [ ]
INSTRUCTION:
TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL, STRIKE A LINE
THROUGH THE
NOMINEE'S NAME ON THE LIST BELOW
Gary
B. Abromovitz |
Timothy
F. Meeker |
Stanlee
N. Rubin |
John
B. Butterworth |
Byron
H. Rubin |
Adolpho
R. Telles |
Christopher
L. Carameros |
Gerald
J. Rubin |
Darren
G. Woody |
2. |
To
approve amendments to the Helen of Troy Limited 1998 Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Plan to increase the number of Common Shares available
for issue to its employees by an additional 750,000 shares, to limit the
maximum amount of shares that can be issued in any fiscal year to 250,000,
but exclude Mr. Gerald J. Rubin, the Company's Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President and Mr. Christopher L. Carameros, an
Executive Vice-President, from any future grants under the 1998 Plan and
to require that any shares of restricted stock granted under the plan
reduce the available shares under the plan by 3 shares.
|
|
|
For
[ ] Against [ ] Abstain [
] |
|
|
3. |
To
amend the Company’s Bye-laws to allow for notice of and voting by
directors and shareholders at meetings by electronic or other means.
|
|
|
For
[ ] Against [ ] Abstain [ ]
|
|
|
4. |
To
appoint KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company to serve for the
2006 fiscal year. |
|
|
For
[ ] Against [ ] Abstain [ ]
|
|
This
proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by
the undersigned shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED
FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4.
THIS
PROXY ALSO GRANTS AUTHORITY TO VOTE SUCH SHARES AS TO ANY OTHER MATTER WHICH MAY
BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE MEETING IN THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE HOLDERS OF THIS
PROXY.
IMPORTANT:
Please date this proxy and sign exactly as your name or names appear hereon. If
shares are held jointly, signature should include both names. Executors,
administrators, trustees, guardians, and others signing in the representative
capacity, please so indicate when signing.
DATE: |
___________________,
2005 |
SIGNATURE: |
_______________________________________________________ |
SECOND
SIGNATURE, IF HELD JOINTLY: |
_______________________________________________________
|
PLEASE
SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ACCOMPANYING
ENVELOPE.