Edgar Filing: COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP /MD/

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number 001-36094

The Community Financial Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		52-1652138
(State of other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

3035 Leonardtown Road, Waldorf, Maryland		20601
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(301) 645-5601

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer x
Non-accelerated Filer ¨	Smaller Reporting Company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

As of November 1, 2018, the registrant had 5,577,666 shares of common stock outstanding.

THE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

	Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017	1

Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	49

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	84

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	85

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings	86

Item 1A – Risk Factors	86

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	86

Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities	86

Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures	86

Item 5 – Other Information	86

Item 6 – Exhibits	86

SIGNATURES	87

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION - ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	26,718		$	13,315
Federal funds sold		36,099			-
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		8,778			2,102
Securities available for sale (AFS), at fair value		107,962			68,164
Securities held to maturity (HTM), at amortized cost		97,217			99,246
Equity securities carried at fair value through income		4,359			-
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions		249			121
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock - at cost		2,547			7,276
Loans receivable		1,308,654			1,151,130
Less: allowance for loan losses		(10,739	)		(10,515	)
Net loans		1,297,915			1,140,615
Goodwill		10,708			-
Premises and equipment, net		22,433			21,391
Other real estate owned (OREO)		8,207			9,341
Accrued interest receivable		5,032			4,511
Investment in bank owned life insurance		36,071			29,398
Core deposit intangible		2,993			-
Net deferred tax assets		6,999			5,922
Other assets		2,122			4,559
Total Assets	$	1,676,409		$	1,405,961
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	217,151		$	159,844
Interest-bearing deposits		1,235,220			946,393
Total deposits		1,452,371			1,106,237
Short-term borrowings		5,000			87,500
Long-term debt		20,451			55,498
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures (TRUPs)		12,000			12,000
Subordinated notes - 6.25%		23,000			23,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		13,439			11,769
Total Liabilities		1,526,261			1,296,004

Stockholders' Equity
Common stock - par value $.01; authorized - 15,000,000 shares; issued 5,575,024 and 4,649,658 shares, respectively		56			46
Additional paid in capital		84,246			48,209
Retained earnings		69,295			63,648
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,633	)		(1,191	)
Unearned ESOP shares		(816	)		(755	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		150,148			109,957
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	1,676,409		$	1,405,961

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2018			2017		2018			2017
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans, including fees	$	15,085		$	12,671	$	44,294		$	37,051
Interest and dividends on investment securities		1,311			988		3,617			2,907
Interest on deposits with banks		88			21		220			39
Total Interest and Dividend Income		16,484			13,680		48,131			39,997

Interest Expense
Deposits		2,835			1,563		7,196			4,234
Short-term borrowings		142			304		642			734
Long-term debt		746			805		2,231			2,414
Total Interest Expense		3,723			2,672		10,069			7,382

Net Interest Income		12,761			11,008		38,062			32,615
Provision for loan losses		40			224		940			980
Net Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses		12,721			10,784		37,122			31,635
Noninterest Income
Loan appraisal, credit, and miscellaneous charges		81			28		141			84
Gain on sale of assets		-			-		1			47
Net gains on sale of investment securities		-			-		-			133
Unrealized loss on equity securities		(8	)		-		(86	)		-
Income from bank owned life insurance		227			196		677			581
Service charges		770			639		2,269			1,909
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		-			294		-			294
Total Noninterest Income		1,070			1,157		3,002			3,048
Noninterest Expense
Salary and employee benefits		4,739			4,056		14,915			12,567
Occupancy expense		744			630		2,249			1,941
Advertising		165			156		504			404
Data processing expense		769			555		2,234			1,766
Professional fees		442			510		1,220			1,190
Merger and acquisition costs		11			239		3,620			494
Depreciation of premises and equipment		207			191		608			594
Telephone communications		62			46		230			142
Office supplies		31			26		112			86
FDIC Insurance		185			178		496			505
OREO valuation allowance and expenses		165			283		516			587
Core deposit intangible amortization		193			-		597			-
Other		779			572		2,607			2,039
Total Noninterest Expense		8,492			7,442		29,908			22,315

Income before income taxes		5,299			4,499		10,216			12,368
Income tax expense		1,441			1,717		2,802			4,701
Net Income	$	3,858		$	2,782	$	7,414		$	7,667
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic	$	0.70		$	0.60	$	1.34		$	1.66
Diluted	$	0.70		$	0.60	$	1.34		$	1.65
Cash dividends paid per common share	$	0.10		$	0.10	$	0.30		$	0.30

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017			2018			2017

Net Income	$	3,858		$	2,782		$	7,414		$	7,667
Net unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(171) and $(32), and$(547) and $257, respectively.		(451	)		(49	)		(1,442	)		396
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax benefit of $- and $- and $- and $(3), respectively.		-			-			-			(6	)
Comprehensive Income	$	3,407		$	2,733		$	5,972		$	8,057

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	7,414		$	7,667
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Provision for loan losses		940			980
Depreciation and amortization		1,256			1,201
Loans originated for resale		-			(2,529	)
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		-			2,823
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		-			(294	)
Net loss (gains) on the sale of OREO		8			(36	)
Gains on sales of investment securities		-			(133	)
Unrealized loss on equity securities		86			-
Gain on sale of assets		(1	)		(47	)
Net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities		217			332
Net accretion of merger accounting adjustments		(642	)		-
Amortization of core deposit intangible		597			-
Increase in OREO valuation allowance		425			576
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(673	)		(581	)
Decrease (increase) in deferred income tax benefit		110			(805	)
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(104	)		(515	)
Stock based compensation		349			399
Compensation expense due to excess of fair market value over cost of leveraged ESOP shares released		29			-
Increase (decrease) in net deferred loan costs		169			(636	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		117			(175	)
Decrease in other assets		2,779			1,198
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		13,076			9,425

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of AFS investment securities		(52,669	)		(16,831	)
Proceeds from redemption or principal payments of AFS investment securities		6,341			5,330
Purchase of HTM investment securities		(9,360	)		(13,135	)
Proceeds from maturities or principal payments of HTM investment securities		14,316			14,185
Proceeds from sale of HTM investment securities		-			3,569
Proceeds from sale of AFS investment securities		34,919			3,702
Net decrease (increase) of FHLB and FRB stock		4,933			(211	)
Loans originated or acquired		(238,696	)		(247,726	)
Principal collected on loans		221,393			187,475
Purchase of premises and equipment		(866	)		(742	)
Proceeds from sale of OREO		982			903
Acquisition net cash acquired		32,450			-
Proceeds from disposal of asset		1,748			387

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		15,491			(63,094	)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(continued)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	$	146,910		$	59,176
Proceeds from long-term debt		20,000			10,000
Payments of long-term debt		(55,048	)		(20,045	)
Net (decrease) increase in short term borrowings		(82,500	)		12,500
Exercise of stock options		-			155
Dividends paid		(1,623	)		(1,353	)
Net change in unearned ESOP shares		(61	)		(823	)
Repurchase of common stock		(67	)		-
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		27,611			59,610
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	56,178		$	5,941

Cash and Cash Equivalents - January 1		15,417			11,263
Cash and Cash Equivalents - September 30	$	71,595		$	17,204

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for
Interest	$	10,491		$	7,631
Income taxes	$	2,549		$	5,085

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Operating Activities
Issuance of common stock for payment of compensation	$	321		$	203
Transfer from loans to OREO	$	282		$	3,622
Financed amount of sale of OREO	$	-		$	200

Business Combination Non-Cash Disclosures
Assets acquired in business combination (net of cash received)	$	192,259		$	-
Liabilities assumed in business combination	$	200,660		$	-

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of The Community Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Community Bank of the Chesapeake (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, Community Mortgage Corporation of Tri-County, included herein are unaudited.

The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The balances as of December 31, 2017 have been derived from audited financial statements. There have been two additions to the Company’s accounting policies as disclosed in the 2017 Annual Report as well as the adoption of new accounting standards section included in Note 1. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the remainder of the year or any other period.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Nature of Business

The Company provides a variety of financial services to individuals and businesses through its offices in Southern Maryland and Annapolis and Fredericksburg, Virginia. Its primary deposit products are demand, savings and time deposits, and its primary lending products are commercial and residential mortgage loans, commercial loans, construction and land development loans, home equity and second mortgages and commercial equipment loans.

The Company’s branches are located at its main office in Waldorf, Maryland, and branch offices in Waldorf, Bryans Road, Dunkirk, Leonardtown, La Plata, Charlotte Hall, Prince Frederick, Lusby, California, Maryland; and Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Company maintains five loan production offices (“LPOs”) in Annapolis, La Plata, Prince Frederick and Leonardtown, Maryland; and Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Leonardtown LPO is co-located with the branch.

The Company closed its Central Park Fredericksburg branch during the third quarter of 2017. This location continues to serve as a loan production office and the branch closure did not have a material effect on operations. The Company offered branch employees open positions.

On January 1, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of County First Bank (“County First”) after regulatory approval and County First shareholder approvals were obtained. The Company’s assets increased to $1.6 billion during the first quarter of 2018. See Note 2 – Business Combination and Goodwill for additional information. The Company closed four of five acquired County First branches in May of 2018 with the La Plata downtown branch remaining open As of September 30, 2018, all three held for sale County First branch buildings have been sold. The remaining County First branch building's lease expires in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, real estate acquired in the settlement of loans, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, evaluating other-than-temporary-impairment of investment securities and valuation of deferred tax assets.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts, previously reported, have been reclassified to state all periods on a comparable basis and had no effect on stockholders’ equity or net income.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management performed an evaluation events and transactions since the balance sheet date and determined that no subsequent events occurred that require accrual or disclosure.

New Accounting Policy

See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a list of policies in effect as of December 31, 2017. The below summary is intended to provide updates or new policies required as a result of a new accounting standard or a change to the Company’s operations or assets that require a new or amended policy.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of goodwill, core deposit intangible assets and other identifiable assets that result from business combinations. Goodwill and core deposit intangible assets are related to the acquisition of County First Bank on January 1, 2018. Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill will be tested annually for impairment, during the fourth quarter or on an interim basis if circumstances dictate. If impairment exists, the amount of impairment would result in a charge to expense. Core deposit intangible assets represent the future earnings potential of acquired deposit relationships that are amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting which requires purchased assets and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values. In many cases, the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined by estimating the cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities and discounting them at appropriate market rates. The Company determines the fair values of loans, core deposit intangible, and deposits with the assistance of a third-party vendor.

Loans acquired in business combinations are recorded in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” Accordingly, acquired loans are segregated between purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans (ASC 310-30) and Non-PCI loans (ASC-310-20) and are recorded at fair value without the carryover of the related allowance for loan losses. The excess of expected cash flows above the fair value of the majority of loans will be accreted to interest income over the remaining lives of the loans in accordance with FASB ASC 310-20.

The estimated fair values are subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available through the measurement period. While additional significant changes to the closing date fair values are not expected, any information relative to the changes in these fair values will be evaluated to determine if such changes are due to events and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. During the measurement period, any such changes will be recorded as part of the closing date fair value.

Purchase Credit Impaired “PCI” Loans

Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are considered credit impaired. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include statistics such as internal risk grade, past due and nonaccrual status, recent borrower credit scores and recent loan-to-value (“LTV”) percentages. Purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans are initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. We estimate the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition using specific credit review of certain loans, quantitative credit risk, interest rate risk and prepayment risk models, and qualitative economic and environmental assessments, each of which incorporate our best estimate of current key relevant factors, such as property values, default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds.

Under the accounting guidance for PCI loans, the excess of the total cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans, in situations where there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows to be collected. The difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred to as the nonaccretable difference and is available to absorb future charge-offs.

In addition, subsequent to acquisition, we periodically evaluate our estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations require the continued usage of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Estimates of cash flows for PCI loans require significant judgment given the impact of property value changes, changing loss severities, prepayment speeds and other relevant factors. Decreases in the expected cash flows will generally result in a charge to the provision for loan losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. Significant increases in the expected cash flows will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans. Disposals of loans, which may include sales of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in full or part from the borrower or foreclosure of the collateral, result in removal of the loan from the PCI loan portfolio at its carrying amount.

At September 30, 2018, PCI loans represent loans acquired from County First, that were deemed credit impaired at the time of acquisition. PCI loans that had been classified as nonperforming loans by County First are no longer classified as nonperforming so long as, at acquisition and quarterly re-estimation periods, we believe we will fully collect the new carrying value of these loans. It is important to note that judgment regarding the timing and amount of cash flows to be collected is required to classify PCI loans as performing, even if the loan is contractually past due.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The Company records revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and all subsequent ASUs that modified ASU 2014-09, which have been codified in ASC Topic 606, Under Topic 606, the Company must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Significant revenue has not been recognized in the current reporting period that results from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.

The Company’s primary sources of revenue are derived from interest and dividends earned on loans, investment securities, and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of Topic 606. The Company evaluated the nature of its contracts with customers and determined that further disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers into more granular categories beyond what is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income was not necessary. The Company generally fully satisfies its performance obligations on its contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices are typically fixed; charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Adoption of the amendments to the revenue recognition principles, did not materially change our accounting policies. The following is a discussion of revenues within the scope of the new guidance:

Service fees on deposit accounts - The Company earns fees from its deposit clients for various transaction-based activities, account maintenance, and overdraft or non-sufficient funds (“NSF”). Transaction based fees, which include services such as stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the client's request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance and account management, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft and NSF fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs or the NSF item is presented. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the client's account balance.

ATM and debit card income - The Company earns interchange fees from debit cardholder transactions conducted through the payment networks. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.

Revenues from the sale of Other Real Estate Owned - ASC Topic 606 requires recognition of estimated income from the sale of OREO property that is under contract at the balance sheet date. At September 30, 2018 there were no contracts for the sale of OREO property.

The Company’s revenue recognition pattern for revenue streams within the scope of ASU Topic 606 did not change significantly from previous practice and was immaterial to the Company’s financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Accounting Standards

New Accounting Standards - Issued and Effective

ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 in May 2014. The core principle of the amendments in this update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods and services. The ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as the Company’s primary sources of revenues are derived from interest and dividends earned on loans, investment securities, and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of ASU 2014-09. The Company’s revenue recognition pattern for revenue streams within the scope of ASU 2014-09, including but not limited to service charges on deposit accounts and gains or losses on the sale of other real estate owned, did not change significantly from current practice. The standard permits the use of either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. The Company elected to use the modified retrospective transition method. Since there was no net income impact upon adoption of the new guidance, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not necessary. Consistent with the modified retrospective approach, the Company did not adjust prior period amounts.

ASU 2016-01 - Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (iv) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, (v) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments, (vi) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and (viii) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities. With the assistance of an expert, Management developed a process to adequately document its review and analysis of “exit pricing” for the fair values of loans, deposits and other financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 was effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Notes 13 and 14 for further information regarding the valuations.

ASU 2018-02 “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income” (Topic 220). ASU 2018-02. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Job Act (Tax Act) was signed into law. Under current U.S. GAAP, deferred tax assets and liabilities are to be adjusted for the effect of a change in tax laws or rates with the effect included in income from continuing operations in the reporting period that includes the enactment date. This accounting treatment resulted in the tax effect of items within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not reflecting the appropriate tax rate. This ASU allows stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings. The Company early adopted this guidance during the quarter ended December 31, 2017, resulting in a reclassification of $196,000 from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings to adjust the tax effect of items within accumulated other comprehensive loss to reflect the newly enacted federal corporate income tax rate.

ASU 2016-15 - Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how eight particular transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities are required to apply the guidance retrospectively. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance retrospectively for an issue, the amendments related to that issue will be applied prospectively. As this guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows, ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. There were no material reclassifications to the Company’s cash flow statement for the none months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” ASU 2016-16 provides guidance stating that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash.” ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition and provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities constitutes a business. ASU 2017-01 is intended to provide guidance when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements as the transaction to acquire County First was already clearly within the scope of ASC 805, “Business Combinations.”

ASU 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20) - Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.” ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope of Subtopic 610-20 and adds guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets, including partial sales of real estate. Historically, U.S. GAAP contained several different accounting models to evaluate whether the transfer of certain assets qualified for sale treatment. ASU 2017-05 reduces the number of potential accounting models that might apply and clarifies which model does apply in various circumstances. ASU 2017-05 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. Under ASU 2017-09, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if all of the following are the same immediately before and after the change: (i) the award's fair value, (ii) the award’s vesting conditions and (iii) the award's classification as an equity or liability instrument. ASU 2017-09 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

New Accounting Standards - Issued, But Not Yet Effective

ASU 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842). In February 2016, the FASB amended existing guidance that requires lessees recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short term leases) at the commencement date (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU was subsequently amended by ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, which provides entities with an additional transition method when adopting the new lease standard.

Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard on the consolidated financial statements. Based on leases outstanding at September 30, 2018, the Company does not expect the updates to have a material impact on the income statement but does anticipate an increase in assets and liabilities. The Company will continue to evaluate the potential impact of ASU 2016-02 during 2018. This new standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019.

ASU 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU No. 2016-13 significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that aren’t measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for PCI debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach).

The Company has formed a CECL committee with representation from various departments. The committee is working with consultants who will assist us in developing a model that will comply with CECL requirements. The committee is continuing to evaluate the provisions of ASU 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’ Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective.

ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. This new standard will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2020.

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test which required entities to compute the implied fair value of goodwill. Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform an annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for us on January 1, 2020, with earlier adoption permitted and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20) - Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. ASU 2017-08 shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium to require such premiums to be amortized to the earliest call date unless applicable guidance related to certain pools of securities is applied to consider estimated prepayments. Under prior guidance, entities were generally required to amortize premiums on individual, non-pooled callable debt securities as a yield adjustment over the contractual life of the security. ASU 2017-08 does not change the accounting for callable debt securities held at a discount. ASU 2017-08 will be effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2017-08 on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815 to improve the transparency and understandability of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities to better align the entity’s financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities and to reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting. ASU 2017-12 will be effective for us on January 1, 2019 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard but does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

ASU 2018-11, Leases - Targeted Improvements. This ASU provide entities with relief from the costs of implementing certain aspects of the new leasing standard, ASU No. 2016-02. Specifically, under the amendments in ASU 2018-11: (1) entities may elect not to recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new leasing standard, and (2) lessors may elect not to separate lease and non-lease components when certain conditions are met. The amendments have the same effective date as ASU 2016-02 (January 1, 2019 for the Company). The Company expects to elect both transition options. ASU 2018-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13. This ASU eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Among the changes, entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy but will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. Entities are also allowed to early adopt any eliminated or modified disclosure requirements and delay adoption of the new disclosure requirements until their effective date. As ASU No. 2018-13 only revises disclosure requirements, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-14, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, This ASU makes minor changes to the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020; early adoption is permitted. As ASU 2018-14 only revises disclosure requirements, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40). In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15. The ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Implementation costs incurred in the application development stage are capitalized depending on the nature of the costs, while costs incurred during the preliminary project and post implementation stages are expensed as the activities are performed. The amendment also requires entities to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard but does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

In August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10532 - “Disclosure Update and Simplification.” This rule, which became effective on November 5, 2018, amends various SEC disclosure requirements that have been determined to be redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated, or superseded. The changes are generally expected to reduce or eliminate certain disclosures; however, the amendments did expand interim period disclosure requirements related to changes in shareholders' equity. Subsequently, the SEC announced that in light of the timing of the effectiveness to the filing date for most filers’ quarterly reports, the staff would not object if the filer’s first presentation of the changes in shareholders’ equity is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter that begins after the effective date of the amendments. Accordingly, the Company will begin including the Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity in its March 31, 2019 Form 10-Q.

NOTE 2 – BUSINESS COMBINATION AND GOODWILL

Business Combinations

Generally, acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, “Business Combinations.” Both the purchased assets and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding fair values becomes available.

County First Bank

On January 1, 2018, the Company completed its previously announced merger of County First with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving bank (the “Merger”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2017, by and among the Company, the Bank and County First (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of County First issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time was converted into the right to receive 0.9543 shares of Company common stock and $2.20 in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). The $2.20 in cash represents the sum of (a) $1.00 in cash consideration (the “Cash Consideration”) plus (b) $1.20 in Contingent Cash Consideration that was determined before the completion of the Merger in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. The aggregate merger consideration consisted of 918,526 shares of the Company’s common stock and $2.1 million in cash. Based upon the $38.78 per share price of the Company’s common stock, the transaction value was $37.7 million.

County First had five branch offices in La Plata, Waldorf, New Market, Prince Frederick and California, Maryland. The Bank kept the La Plata branch open and consolidated the remaining four branches with legacy Community Bank of the Chesapeake branch offices in May of 2018.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed from County First were recorded at their fair values as of the closing date of the merger. Goodwill of $10.3 million was recorded at the time of the acquisition. Refinements to the fair value adjustments for premises and equipment and deferred taxes, resulted in aggregate goodwill of $10.7 million at September 30, 2018 an increase of $431,000 from the goodwill estimated at the time of acquisition.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid by the Company in the merger with County First and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date:

(dollars in thousands)	As Recorded by County First		Fair Value and Other Merger Related Adjustments			As Recorded by the Company
Consideration Paid
Cash						$	2,122
Common shares issued							35,620
Fair Value of Total Consideration Transferred						$	37,742

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34,409	$	-		$	34,409
Securities		38,861		(619	)		38,242
Loans, net of allowance		142,404		(1,654	)		140,750
Premises and equipment		2,980		181			3,161
Core deposit intangibles		-		3,590			3,590
Interest receivable		513		(12	)		501
Bank owned life insurance		6,275		-			6,275
Deferred tax asset		639		(339	)		300
Other assets		586		-			586
Total assets acquired	$	226,667	$	1,147		$	227,814

Deposits	$	199,210	$	18		$	199,228
Other liabilities		1,449		103			1,552
Total liabilities assumed	$	200,659	$	121		$	200,780
Net identifiable assets acquired	$	26,008	$	1,026		$	27,034
Goodwill resulting from acquisition						$	10,708

The following table presents certain pro forma information as if County First had been acquired on January 1, 2017. These results combine the historical results of County First in the Company’s consolidated statement of income and, while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2017. Merger and acquisition costs of $741,000 and $3.6 million (pre-tax) are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company has not segregated County First earnings after the acquisition date as the bank’s operations have been merged into Community Bank of the Chesapeake and it would be impractical to do so. There are no assumptions about what merger related costs would have been in the proforma information below, only actual expenses are included in net income. Furthermore, additional expenses related to systems conversions and other costs of integration are expected to be recorded during 2018. Additionally, the Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts below:

Proforma Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	The Community Financial Corporation Actual		County First Actual		Proforma September 30, 2017		Actual Results Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)	$	35,698	$	6,561	$	42,259	$	41,056
Net income		7,667		1,009		8,676		7,414
Basic earnings per common share	$	1.66	$	1.10	$	1.56	$	1.34

NOTE 3 – INCOME TAXES

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws and when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized. It is the Company’s policy to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense.

	The Three Months Ended						The Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017

Current income tax expense	$	1,606		$	1,906		$	3,065		$	5,472
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		(165	)		(189	)		(263	)		(771	)
Income tax expense as reported	$	1,441		$	1,717		$	2,802		$	4,701

Effective tax rate		27.2	%		38.2	%		27.4	%		38.0	%

Net deferred tax assets totaled $7.0 million at September 30, 2018 and $5.9 million at December 31, 2017. No valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was recorded at September 30, 2018 as management believes it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized against deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income.

The effective income tax rates differed from the statutory federal and state income tax rates during 2018 and 2017, respectively, primarily due to the effect of merger related expenses, tax-exempt loans, life insurance policies, the income tax effects associated with stock-based compensation and certain non-deductible expenses for state income taxes.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted on December 22, 2017, as more fully discussed in the 2017 Form 10-K. Among other things, the new law established a new, flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%. As a result of the new law, the Company recognized a provisional net tax expense of $2.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. We will continue to analyze certain aspects of the new law and refine our calculations based on this analysis and future tax positions taken, which could affect the measurement of these assets and liabilities or give rise to new deferred tax amounts. There has been no change to the provisional net tax expense we recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

NOTE 4 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following tables present the components of comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. The Company’s comprehensive gains and losses and reclassification adjustments were solely for securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Reclassification adjustments are recorded in non-interest income.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018									Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period	$	(622	)	$	(171	)	$	(451	)	$	(81	)	$	(32	)	$	(49	)
Reclassification adjustments		-		$	-			-			-			-			-
Other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(622	)	$	(171	)	$	(451	)	$	(81	)	$	(32	)	$	(49	)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period	$	(1,989	)	$	(547	)	$	(1,442	)	$	653		$	257		$	396
Reclassification adjustments				$	-			-			(9	)		(3	)		(6	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(1,989	)	$	(547	)	$	(1,442	)	$	644		$	254		$	390

The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018			Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Net Unrealized Gains And Losses			Net Unrealized Gains And Losses			Net Unrealized Gains And Losses			Net Unrealized Gains And Losses

Beginning of period	$	(2,182	)	$	(489	)	$	(1,191	)	$	(928	)
Other comprehensive gains (losses), net of tax before reclassifications		(451	)		(49	)		(1,442	)		396
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		-			-			-			(6	)
Net other comprehensive (loss) income		(451	)		(49	)		(1,442	)		390
End of period	$	(2,633	)	$	(538	)	$	(2,633	)	$	(538	)

The FASB issued ASU 2018-02 allowing companies to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings. The Company early adopted this guidance during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and utilizing the portfolio method reclassified $196,000 from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings to eliminate the stranded tax effects.

NOTE 5 - EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)

Basic earnings per common share represent income available to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may have been issued by the Company related to outstanding stock options and were determined using the treasury stock method. The Company has not granted any stock options since 2007 and all outstanding options expired on July 17, 2017.

As of September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no options, which were excluded from the calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive, because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares. Basic and diluted earnings per share have been computed based on weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		2018		2017
Net Income	$	3,858	$	2,782	$	7,414	$	7,667

Average number of common shares outstanding		5,551,184		4,633,391		5,550,020		4,631,571
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents		-		26		-		1,929
Average number of shares used to calculate diluted EPS		5,551,184		4,633,417		5,550,020		4,633,500

Earnings Per Common Share
Basic	$	0.70	$	0.60	$	1.34	$	1.66
Diluted		0.70		0.60		1.34		1.65

NOTE 6 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has stock-based incentive arrangements to attract and retain key personnel. In May 2015, the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by shareholders, which authorizes the issuance of restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, stock units and stock options to the Board of Directors and key employees. Compensation expense for service-based awards is recognized over the vesting period. Performance-based awards are recognized based on a vesting schedule and the probability of achieving goals specified at the time of the grant. The 2015 Plan replaced the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan.

Stock-based compensation expense totaled $110,000 and $349,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $115,000 and $399,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Stock-based compensation expense consisted of the vesting of grants of restricted stock.

The Company has not granted any stock options since 2007 and all outstanding options expired on July 17, 2017. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding employee stock options were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company estimated expected market price volatility and expected term of the options based on historical data and other factors. The exercise price for options granted is set at the discretion of the committee administering the Plan but is not less than the market value of the shares as of the date of grant. An option’s maximum term is 10 years and the options vest at the discretion of the committee. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding.

The following table below summarize option activity and outstanding and exercisable options at and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

				Weighted				Weighted-Average
				Average		Aggregate		Contractual Life
				Exercise		Intrinsic		Remaining In
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Shares			Price		Value		Years

Outstanding at January 1, 2017		15,081		$	27.70	$	-
Exercised		(14,231	)		27.70		134
Expired		(350	)		27.70		-
Forfeited		(500	)		27.70		-

Outstanding at December 31, 2017		-		$	-	$	-		-

Exercisable at December 31, 2017		-		$	-	$	-		-

The Company granted restricted stock in accordance with the Plan. The vesting period for outstanding restricted stock grants is between three and five years. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, unrecognized stock compensation expense was $486,000 and $521,000, respectively. The following tables summarize the nonvested restricted stock awards outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

	Restricted Stock
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2018		32,809		$	22.61
Granted		8,662			37.13
Vested		(17,607	)		21.85
Cancelled		(391	)		27.69

Nonvested at September 30, 2018		23,473		$	28.36

	Restricted Stock
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2017		47,881		$	20.41
Granted		6,752			30.20
Vested		(21,738	)		20.13
Cancelled		(86	)		20.75

Nonvested at December 31, 2017		32,809		$	22.61

NOTE 7 - GUARANTEED PREFERRED BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES (“TRUPs”)

On June 15, 2005, Tri-County Capital Trust II (“Capital Trust II”), a Delaware business trust formed, funded and wholly owned by the Company, issued $5.0 million of variable-rate capital securities in a private pooled transaction. The variable rate is based on the 90-day LIBOR rate plus 1.70%. The Trust used the proceeds from this issuance, along with the $155,000 for Capital Trust II’s common securities, to purchase $5.2 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate on the debentures and the trust preferred securities is variable and adjusts quarterly. These capital securities qualify as Tier I capital and are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Junior Subordinated Debentures.” Both the capital securities of Capital Trust II and the junior subordinated debentures are scheduled to mature on June 15, 2035, unless called by the Company.

On July 22, 2004, Tri-County Capital Trust I (“Capital Trust I”), a Delaware business trust formed, funded and wholly owned by the Company, issued $7.0 million of variable-rate capital securities in a private pooled transaction. The variable rate is based on the 90-day LIBOR rate plus 2.60%. The Trust used the proceeds from this issuance, along with the Company’s $217,000 capital contribution for Capital Trust I’s common securities, to purchase $7.2 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate on the debentures and the trust preferred securities is variable and adjusts quarterly. These debentures qualify as Tier I capital and are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Junior Subordinated Debentures.” Both the capital securities of Capital Trust I and the junior subordinated debentures are scheduled to mature on July 22, 2034, unless called by the Company.

NOTE 8 – SUBORDINATED NOTES

On February 6, 2015 the Company issued $23.0 million of unsecured 6.25% fixed to floating rate subordinated notes due February 15, 2025 (“subordinated notes”). On February 13, 2015, the Company used proceeds of the offering to redeem all $20 million of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock issued under the Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”) program. The subordinated notes qualify as Tier 2 regulatory capital and replaced SBLF Tier 1 capital. The subordinated notes are not listed on any securities exchange or included in any automated dealer quotation system and there is no market for the notes. The notes are unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt, whether secured or unsecured. The notes are not guaranteed obligations of any of the Company’s subsidiaries.

Interest will accrue at a fixed per annum rate of 6.25% from and including the issue date to but excluding February 15, 2020. From and including February 15, 2020 to but excluding the maturity date interest will accrue at a floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 479 basis points. Interest is payable on the notes on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing August 15, 2015, through February 15, 2020, and thereafter February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year through the maturity date or earlier redemption date.

The subordinated notes may be redeemed in whole or in part on February 15, 2020 or on any scheduled interest payment date thereafter and upon the occurrence of certain special events. The redemption price is equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Any partial redemption will be made pro rata among all holders of the subordinated notes. The subordinated notes are not subject to repayment at the option of the holders. The subordinated notes may be redeemed at any time, if (1) a change or prospective change in law occurs that could prevent the Company from deducting interest payable on the notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (2) a subsequent event occurs that precludes the notes from being recognized as Tier 2 Capital for regulatory capital purposes, or (3) the Company is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

NOTE 9 - OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED (“OREO”)

OREO assets are presented net of the valuation allowance. The Company considers OREO as classified assets for regulatory and financial reporting. OREO carrying amounts reflect management’s estimate of the realizable value of these properties incorporating current appraised values, local real estate market conditions and related costs. An analysis of OREO activity follows.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017			2017
Balance at beginning of year	$	9,341		$	7,763		$	7,763
Additions of underlying property		282			3,622			3,634
Disposals of underlying property		(991	)		(1,068	)		(1,456	)
Valuation allowance		(425	)		(576	)		(600	)
Balance at end of period	$	8,207		$	9,741		$	9,341

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, OREO additions were $282,000 and $3.6 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, additions of $282,000 were for $139,000 of capitalized costs to improve a development project and $143,000 for commercial real estate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, additions of $3.6 million consisted of $3.0 million related to the foreclosure of a stalled residential development project. Further, additions included $103,000 for residential lots and $495,000 for a commercial office building.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were OREO disposals of $991,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. The Company recognized net losses of $8,000 on disposals of multiple residential lots of $188,000, a commercial building of $476,000 and a commercial lot of $327,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company recognized net gains of $36,000 on disposals of $1.1 million for four residential properties and multiple residential lots for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Bank provided $200,000 in financing for one residential property and the three residential lots which were transferred from OREO to loans during the first quarter of 2017. The transaction qualified for full accrual sales treatment under ASC Topic 360-20-40 “Property Plant and Equipment – Derecognition”.

The Company had no impaired loans and $122,000 of impaired loans secured by residential real estate for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

To adjust properties to current appraised values, additions to the valuation allowance of $425,000 and $576,000 were taken for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. OREO carrying amounts reflect management’s estimate of the realizable value of these properties incorporating current appraised values, local real estate market conditions and related costs. Expenses applicable to OREO assets included the following.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		2018		2017
Valuation allowance	$	142	$	263	$	425	$	576
Losses (gains) on dispositions		-		-		8		(36	)
Operating expenses		23		20		83		47
	$	165	$	283	$	516	$	587

NOTE 10 – SECURITIES

	September 30, 2018
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized		Estimated
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Securities available for sale (AFS)
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities ("MBS")	$	6,705	$	-	$	356	$	6,349
Residential Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("CMOs")		92,042		12		2,622		89,432
U.S. Agency		12,848		-		667		12,181
Total securities available for sale	$	111,595	$	12	$	3,645	$	107,962
Securities held to maturity (HTM)
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
Residential MBS	$	26,728	$	83	$	1,108	$	25,703
Residential CMOs		52,087		80		1,726		50,441
U.S. Agency		10,928		-		493		10,435
Asset-backed securities issued by Others:
Residential CMOs		522		-		41		481
Callable GSE Agency Bonds		5,011		-		200		4,811
Certificates of Deposit Fixed		947		-		-		947
U.S. government obligations		994		-		1		993
Total securities held to maturity	$	97,217	$	163	$	3,569	$	93,811

Equity securities carried at fair value through income
CRA investment fund	$	4,359	$	-	$	-	$	4,359
Non-marketable equity securities
Other equity securities	$	249	$	-	$	-	$	249

	December 31, 2017
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized		Estimated
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Securities available for sale (AFS)
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
Residential MBS	$	7,265	$	-	$	178	$	7,087
Residential CMOs		45,283		12		1,158		44,137
U.S. Agency		12,863		-		346		12,517
Bond mutual funds		4,397		26		-		4,423
Total securities available for sale	$	69,808	$	38	$	1,682	$	68,164

Securities held to maturity (HTM)
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
Residential MBS	$	29,113	$	135	$	261	$	28,987
Residential CMOs		54,805		62		845		54,022
U.S. Agency		8,660		-		235		8,425
Asset-backed securities issued by Others:
Residential CMOs		651		-		52		599
Callable GSE Agency Bonds		5,017		-		43		4,974
U.S. government obligations		1,000		-		-		1,000
Total securities held to maturity	$	99,246	$	197	$	1,436	$	98,007

Non-marketable equity securities
Other equity securities	$	121	$	-	$	-	$	121

At September 30, 2018, securities with an amortized cost of $42.6 million were pledged to secure certain customer deposits. At September 30, 2018, securities with an amortized cost of $3.5 million were pledged as collateral for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Atlanta.

At September 30, 2018, greater than 99% of the asset-backed securities and agency bond portfolio was rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s or the equivalent credit rating from another major rating agency. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies had an average life of 4.79 years and average duration of 4.16 years and are guaranteed by their issuer as to credit risk. HTM asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies had an average life of 5.30 years and average duration of 4.57 years and are guaranteed by their issuer as to credit risk.

At December 31, 2017, securities with an amortized cost of $31.5 million were pledged to secure certain customer deposits. At December 31, 2017, securities with an amortized cost of $4.0 million were pledged as collateral for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Atlanta.

At December 31, 2017, greater than 99% of the asset-backed securities and agency bond portfolio was rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s or the equivalent credit rating from another major rating agency. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies had an average life of 4.74 years and average duration of 4.22 years and are guaranteed by their issuer as to credit risk. HTM asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies had an average life of 4.95 years and average duration of 4.39 years and are guaranteed by their issuer as to credit risk.

Management believes that AFS securities with unrealized losses will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold these securities to maturity. Because our intention is not to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments, management considers the unrealized losses in the AFS portfolio to be temporary.

The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold the HTM securities with unrealized losses until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full value for the securities. Because our intention is not to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, management considers the unrealized losses in the held-to-maturity portfolio to be temporary.

No charges related to other-than-temporary impairment were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were no securities sold from the Company’s legacy securities’ portfolios. The Company liquidated most of the acquired County First securities immediately after the legal merger and retained only the certificates of deposit portfolio with an amortized cost of $950,000 at September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized net gains on the sale of securities of $133,000. The Company sold three AFS securities with aggregate carrying values of $3.6 million and six HTM securities with aggregate carrying values of $3.4 million, recognizing gains of $9,000 and $124,000, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recognized net gains on the sale of securities of $175,000. The Company sold three AFS securities with aggregate carrying values of $3.7 million and nine HTM securities with aggregate carrying values of $4.8 million, recognizing gains of $9,000 and $166,000, respectively.

ASC 320 “Investments - Debt Securities.” permits the sale of HTM securities for certain changes in circumstances. The Company may dispose of HTM securities using the safe harbor rule that allows for the sale of HTM securities when principal repayments have reduced the balance to less than 15% of original purchased par. ASC 320 10-25-15 indicates that a sale of a debt security after a substantial portion of the principal has been collected is equivalent to holding the security to maturity. In addition, the Company may dispose of HTM securities under ASC 320-10-25-6 due to a significant deterioration in the issues’ creditworthiness.

AFS Securities

Gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value by length of time that individual AFS securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2018 were as follows:

September 30, 2018	Less Than 12				More Than 12
	Months				Months				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies	$	58,438	$	998	$	43,824	$	2,648	$	102,262	$	3,646
	$	58,438	$	998	$	43,824	$	2,648	$	102,262	$	3,646

At September 30, 2018, the AFS investment portfolio had an estimated fair value of $108.0 million on an amortized cost of $111.6 million. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs are guaranteed by the issuer and AFS U.S. government agency securities and bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies with unrealized losses had an average life of 4.71 years and an average duration of 4.10 years. Management believes that the securities will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed.

Gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value by length of time that the individual AFS securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

December 31, 2017	Less Than 12				More Than 12
	Months				Months				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies	$	24,571	$	328	$	38,428	$	1,354	$	62,999	$	1,682
	$	24,571	$	328	$	38,428	$	1,354	$	62,999	$	1,682

At December 31, 2017, the AFS investment portfolio had an estimated fair value of $68.0 million on an amortized cost of $69.8 million. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs are guaranteed by the issuer and AFS U.S. government agency securities and bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. AFS asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies with unrealized losses had an average life of 4.71 years and an average duration of 4.20 years. Management believes that the securities will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed.

HTM Securities

Gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value by length of time that the individual HTM securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2018 were as follows:

September 30, 2018	Less Than 12				More Than 12
	Months				Months				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies	$	32,377	$	1,041	$	45,326	$	2,287	$	77,703	$	3,328
Callable GSE Agency Bonds		4,811		200		-		-		4,811		200
Asset-backed securities issued by Others		-		-		481		41		481		41
	$	37,188	$	1,241	$	45,807	$	2,328	$	82,995	$	3,569

At September 30, 2018, the HTM investment portfolio had an estimated fair value of $93.8 million on an amortized cost of $97.2 million. Of these securities, $83.0 million were asset-backed securities or bonds issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies and $481,000 were asset-backed securities issued by others.

HTM asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and GSE agency bonds are guaranteed by the issuer and HTM U.S. government agency securities and bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The securities with unrealized losses had an average life of 5.03 years and an average duration of 4.36 years. Management believes that the securities will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold these securities to maturity.

HTM asset-backed securities issued by others are collateralized mortgage obligation securities. The securities have credit support tranches that absorb losses prior to the tranches that the Company owns. The Company reviews credit support positions on its securities regularly. HTM asset-backed securities issued by others with unrealized losses had an average life of 2.83 years and an average duration of 2.28 years.

Gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value by length of time that the individual HTM securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

December 31, 2017	Less Than 12				More Than 12
	Months				Months				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies	$	36,607	$	254	$	45,119	$	1,130	$	81,726	$	1,384
Asset-backed securities issued by Others		-		-		599		52		599		52
	$	36,607	$	254	$	45,718	$	1,182	$	82,325	$	1,436

At December 31, 2017, the HTM investment portfolio had an estimated fair value of $98.0 million on an amortized cost of $99.2 million. Of these securities, $81.7 million were asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies and $599,000 were asset-backed securities issued by others.

HTM asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and GSE agency bonds are guaranteed by the issuer and HTM U.S. government agency securities and bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The securities with unrealized losses had an average life of 5.02 years and an average duration of 4.43 years. Management believes that the securities will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold these securities to maturity.

Credit Quality of Asset-Backed Securities and Agency Bonds

The tables below present the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) or equivalent credit rating from other major rating agencies for AFS and HTM asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies and others or bonds issued by GSEs or U.S. government agencies at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 by carrying value. The Company considers noninvestment grade securities rated BB+ or lower as classified assets for regulatory and financial reporting. GSE asset-backed securities and GSE agency bonds with S&P AA+ ratings were treated as AAA based on regulatory guidance.

September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Credit Rating	Amount		Credit Rating	Amount
(dollars in thousands)
AAA	$	204,657	AAA	$	162,336
BB		522	BB		651
B+		-	B+		-
Total	$	205,179	Total	$	162,987

NOTE 11 – LOANS

Loans consist of the following:

	September 30, 2018											December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	PCI		All other loans**			Total			% of Gross Loans			Total			% of Gross Loans
Commercial real estate	$	1,463	$	846,482		$	847,945			64.84	%	$	727,314			63.25	%
Residential first mortgages		468		156,097			156,565			11.97	%		170,374			14.81	%
Residential rentals		1,261		124,122			125,383			9.59	%		110,228			9.58	%
Construction and land development		-		28,788			28,788			2.20	%		27,871			2.42	%
Home equity and second mortgages		319		36,041			36,360			2.78	%		21,351			1.86	%
Commercial loans		-		62,083			62,083			4.75	%		56,417			4.91	%
Consumer loans		-		730			730			0.06	%		573			0.05	%
Commercial equipment		-		49,883			49,883			3.81	%		35,916			3.12	%
Gross loans		3,511		1,304,226			1,307,737			100.00	%		1,150,044			100.00	%
Net deferred costs (fees)		-		917			917			0.07	%		1,086			0.09	%
Total loans, net of deferred costs	$	3,511	$	1,305,143		$	1,308,654					$	1,151,130
Less: allowance for loan losses		-		(10,739	)		(10,739	)		-0.82	%		(10,515	)		-0.91	%
Net loans	$	3,511	$	1,294,404		$	1,297,915					$	1,140,615

**All other loans include acquired Non-PCI pools at fair value.

At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Bank’s allowance for loan losses totaled $10.7 million and $10.5 million, or 0.82% and 0.91%, respectively, of loan balances. Allowance for loan loss percentage levels decreased in first nine months of 2018, primarily due to the addition of County First loans, after consummation of the legal merger on January 1, 2018, for which no allowance was provided for in accordance with purchase accounting standards. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on a periodic evaluation of the portfolio with consideration given to the overall loss experience, current economic conditions, size, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, financial condition of the borrowers and other relevant factors that, in management’s judgment, warrant recognition in providing an adequate allowance.

Net deferred loan fees and premiums of $917,000 at September 30, 2018 included net deferred fees paid by customers of $3.1 million offset by net deferred premiums paid for the purchase of residential first mortgages and deferred costs of $4.0 million. Net deferred loan fees and premiums of $1.1 million at December 31, 2017 included net deferred fees paid by customers of $2.8 million offset by net deferred premiums paid for the purchase of residential first mortgages and deferred costs of $3.9 million.

Risk Characteristics of Portfolio Segments

Concentrations of Credit - Loans are primarily made within the Company’s operating footprint of Southern Maryland, Annapolis, Maryland and the greater Fredericksburg area of Virginia. Real estate loans can be affected by the condition of the local real estate market. Commercial and industrial loans can be affected by the local economic conditions. The commercial loan portfolio has concentrations in business loans secured by real estate and real estate development loans. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no loans outstanding with foreign entities.

The Company manages its credit products and exposure to credit losses (credit risk) by the following specific portfolio segments (classes), which are levels at which the Company develops and documents its allowance for loan loss methodology. These segments are:

Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”)

Commercial and other real estate projects include office buildings, retail locations, churches, other special purpose buildings and commercial construction. Commercial construction balances were 6.7% and 6.2% of the CRE portfolio at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The Bank offers both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans under these product lines. The primary security on a commercial real estate loan is the real property and the leases that produce income for the real property. Loans secured by commercial real estate are generally limited to 80% of the lower of the appraised value or sales price at origination and have an initial contractual loan payment period ranging from three to 20 years.

Loans secured by commercial real estate are larger and involve greater risks than one-to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by such properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.

Residential First Mortgages

Residential first mortgage loans are generally long-term loans, amortized on a monthly basis, with principal and interest due each month. The contractual loan payment period for residential loans typically ranges from ten to 30 years. The Bank’s experience indicates that real estate loans remain outstanding for significantly shorter time periods than their contractual terms. Borrowers may refinance or prepay loans at their option, without penalty. The Bank’s residential portfolio has both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential first mortgages. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, the Bank purchased residential first mortgages of $4.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively.

The annual and lifetime limitations on interest rate adjustments may limit the increases in interest rates on these loans. There are also credit risks resulting from potential increased costs to the borrower as a result of repricing of adjustable-rate mortgage loans. During periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest cost to the borrower. The Bank’s adjustable rate residential first mortgage portfolio was $53.6 million or 4.1% of total gross loans of $1.31 billion at September 30, 2018 compared to $56.9 million or 5.0% of total gross loans of $1.15 billion at December 31, 2017.

Residential Rentals

Residential rental mortgage loans are amortizing, with principal and interest due each month. The loans are secured by income-producing 1-4 family units and apartments. As of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, $97.5 million and $85.0 million, respectively, were 1-4 family units and $27.9 million and $25.2 million, respectively, were apartment buildings or multi-family units. Loans secured by residential rental properties are generally limited to 80% of the lower of the appraised value or sales price at origination and have an initial contractual loan payment period ranging from three to 20 years. The primary security on a residential rental loan is the property and the leases that produce income. During periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest cost to the borrower. The Bank’s adjustable rate residential rental portfolio was $97.5 million or 7.5% of total gross loans of $1.31 billion at September 30, 2018 compared to $93.4 million or 8.1% of total gross loans of $1.15 billion at December 31, 2017.

Loans secured by residential rental properties involve greater risks than 1-4 family residential mortgage loans. Although, there are similar risk characteristics shared with commercial real estate loans, the balances for the loans secured by residential rental properties are generally smaller. Because payments on loans secured by residential rental properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of these loans may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the rental real estate market or the economy than similar owner-occupied properties.

Construction and Land Development

The Bank offers loans for the construction of one-to-four family dwellings. Generally, these loans are secured by the real estate under construction as well as by guarantees of the principals involved. In addition, the Bank offers loans to acquire and develop land, as well as loans on undeveloped, subdivided lots for home building.

A decline in demand for new housing might adversely affect the ability of borrowers to repay these loans. Construction and land development loans are inherently riskier than financing owner-occupied real estate. The Bank’s risk of loss is affected by the accuracy of the initial estimate of the market value of the completed project as well as the accuracy of the cost estimates made to complete the project. In addition, the volatility of the real estate market has made it increasingly difficult to ensure that the valuation of land associated with these loans is accurate. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, a project’s value might be insufficient to assure full repayment. As a result of these factors, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the project rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If the Bank forecloses on a project, there can be no assurance that the Bank will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.

Home Equity and Second Mortgage Loans

The Bank maintains a portfolio of home equity and second mortgage loans. These products contain a higher risk of default than residential first mortgages as in the event of foreclosure, the first mortgage would need to be paid off prior to collection of the second mortgage. This risk is heightened as the market value of residential property has not fully returned to pre-financial crisis levels and interest rates began to increase in 2017.

Commercial Loans

The Bank offers its business customers a variety of commercial loan products including term loans and lines of credit. Such loans are generally made for terms of five years or less. The Bank offers both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans under these product lines. When making commercial business loans, the Bank considers the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower’s payment history of both corporate and personal debt, the projected cash flows of the business, the viability of the industry in which the borrower operates, the value of the collateral, and the borrower’s ability to service the debt from income. These loans are primarily secured by equipment, real property, accounts receivable or other security as determined by the Bank.

Commercial loans are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flows of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself.

Consumer Loans

Consumer loans consist of loans secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles and trucks. The Bank also makes home improvement loans and offers both secured and unsecured personal lines of credit. Consumer loans entail greater risk from other loan types due to being secured by rapidly depreciating assets or the reliance on the borrower’s continuing financial stability.

Commercial Equipment Loans

These loans consist primarily of fixed-rate, short-term loans collateralized by a commercial customer’s equipment or secured by real property, accounts receivable, or other security as determined by the Bank. When making commercial equipment loans, the Bank considers the same factors it considers when underwriting a commercial business loan. Commercial loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flows of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. In the case of business failure, collateral would need to be liquidated to provide repayment for the loan. In many cases, the highly specialized nature of collateral equipment would make full recovery from the sale of collateral problematic.

Non-accrual and Aging Analysis of Current and Past Due Loans

Non-accrual loans as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

	September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Non- accrual Delinquent Loans		Number of Loans		Non-accrual Current Loans		Number of Loans		Total Non-accrual Loans		Total Number of Loans

Commercial real estate	$	11,148		11	$	655		3	$	11,803		14
Residential first mortgages		850		4		357		1		1,207		5
Residential rentals		756		4		14		1		770		5
Construction and land development		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity and second mortgages		150		2		-		-		150		2
Commercial loans		887		3		-		-		887		3
Consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial equipment		1,521		7		12		1		1,533		8
	$	15,312		31	$	1,038		6	$	16,350		37

	December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Non- accrual Delinquent Loans		Number of Loans		Non-accrual Current Loans		Number of Loans		Total Non-accrual Loans		Total Number of Loans

Commercial real estate	$	1,148		4	$	839		3	$	1,987		7
Residential first mortgages		478		3		507		1		985		4
Residential rentals		84		1		741		3		825		4
Construction and land development		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity and second mortgages		134		3		123		1		257		4
Commercial loans		172		2		-		-		172		2
Consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial equipment		467		3		-		-		467		3
	$	2,483		16	$	2,210		8	$	4,693		24

Non-accrual loans increased $11.7 million from $4.7 million or 0.41% of total loans at December 31, 2017 to $16.4 million or 1.25% of total loans at September 30, 2018. Non-accrual loans can be current but classified as non-accrual due to customer operating results or payment history. All interest accrued but not collected from loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged-off is reversed against interest income. In accordance with the Company’s policy, interest income is recognized on a cash basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status.

At September 30, 2018, non-accrual loans of $16.4 million included 37 loans, of which $13.4 million, or 82% represented 12 loans and three customer relationships. At December 31, 2017, non-accrual loans of $4.7 million included 24 loans, of which $3.3 million, or 71% represented 10 loans and five customer relationships. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, non-accrual loans increased $11.7 million primarily as a result of one well-secured classified relationship of $10.3 million that was placed on non-accrual during the second quarter of 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2017 non-accrual loans decreased $3.0 million due to the foreclosure of a stalled residential development project. The Bank is working with a construction manager to stabilize and market the project. Before the foreclosure, the loans in this relationship were troubled debt restructures (“TDRs”). Additionally, during the third quarter of 2017, non-accrual loans decreased $607,000 due to the foreclosure of a commercial office building.

Non-accrual loans included no TDRs at September 30, 2018 and one TDR totaling $769,000 at December 31, 2017. This loan was classified solely as non-accrual for the calculation of financial ratios. Loan delinquency (90 days or greater delinquent and 31-89 days delinquent) increased $4.5 million from $11.7 million, or 1.02% of loans, at December 31, 2017 to $16.2 million, or 1.24% of loans, at September 30, 2018.

Non-accrual loans on which the recognition of interest has been discontinued, which did not have a specific allowance for impairment, amounted to $15.1 million and $3.8 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Interest due but not recognized on these balances at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $375,000 and $85,000, respectively. Non-accrual loans with a specific allowance for impairment on which the recognition of interest has been discontinued amounted to $1.3 million and $876,000 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Interest due but not recognized on these balances at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $50,000 and $100,000, respectively.

The Company considers a loan to be past due or delinquent when the terms of the contractual obligation are not met by the borrower. PCI loans are included as a single category in the table below as management believes, regardless of their age, there is a lower likelihood of aggregate loss related to these loan pools. Additionally, PCI loans are discounted to allow for the accretion of income on a level yield basis over the life of the loan based on expected cash flows. Regardless of payment status, as long as cash flows can be reasonably estimated, the associated discount on these loan pools results in income recognition.

Past due and PCI loans as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

	September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	31-60 Days		61-89 Days		90 or Greater Days		Total Past Due		PCI Loans		Current		Total Loan Receivables
Commercial real estate	$	-	$	4,399	$	6,918	$	11,317	$	1,463	$	835,165	$	847,945
Residential first mortgages		-		794		203		997		468		155,100		156,565
Residential rentals		-		976		30		1,006		1,261		123,116		125,383
Construction and land dev.		-		-		-		-		-		28,788		28,788
Home equity and second mtg.		256		11		150		417		319		35,624		36,360
Commercial loans		-		8		879		887		-		61,196		62,083
Consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-		730		730
Commercial equipment		55		-		1,486		1,541		-		48,342		49,883
Total	$	311	$	6,188	$	9,666	$	16,165	$	3,511	$	1,288,061	$	1,307,737

	December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	31-60 Days		61-89 Days		90 or Greater Days		Total Past Due		PCI Loans		Current		Total Loan Receivables
Commercial real estate	$	-	$	6,711	$	1,148	$	7,859	$	-	$	719,455	$	727,314
Residential first mortgages		-		68		478		546		-		169,828		170,374
Residential rentals		-		207		84		291		-		109,937		110,228
Construction and land dev.		-		-		-		-		-		27,871		27,871
Home equity and second mtg.		19		18		134		171		-		21,180		21,351
Commercial loans		892		299		172		1,363		-		55,054		56,417
Consumer loans		-		1		-		1		-		572		573
Commercial equipment		1,012		-		467		1,479		-		34,437		35,916
Total	$	1,923	$	7,304	$	2,483	$	11,710	$	-	$	1,138,334	$	1,150,044

Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructures (“TDRs”)

Impaired loans, including TDRs, at September 30, 2018 and 2017 and at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

	September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Recorded Investment With No Allowance		Recorded Investment With Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Quarter Average Recorded Investment		Quarter Interest Income Recognized		YTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Interest Income Recognized

Commercial real estate	$	26,588	$	24,664	$	1,561	$	26,225	$	174	$	26,297	$	340	$	26,499	$	763
Residential first mortgages		2,655		2,616		-		2,616		-		2,627		31		2,651		90
Residential rentals		1,431		1,377		-		1,377		-		1,382		11		1,400		47
Construction and land dev.		729		729		-		729		-		729		11		729		30
Home equity and second mtg.		298		293		-		293		-		300		4		304		10
Commercial loans		2,784		1,890		883		2,773		458		2,775		38		2,779		89
Consumer loans		1		-		1		1		1		1		-		1		-
Commercial equipment		1,577		1,132		402		1,534		377		1,546		3		1,588		33
Total	$	36,063	$	32,701	$	2,847	$	35,548	$	1,010	$	35,657	$	438	$	35,951	$	1,062

	December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Recorded Investment With No Allowance		Recorded Investment With Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		YTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Interest Income Recognized

Commercial real estate	$	33,180	$	30,921	$	2,008	$	32,929	$	370	$	33,575	$	1,379
Residential first mortgages		2,455		1,978		459		2,437		2		2,479		91
Residential rentals		2,389		1,981		395		2,376		18		2,432		111
Construction and land dev.		729		-		729		729		163		729		26
Home equity and second mtg.		317		317		-		317		-		318		12
Commercial loans		3,010		2,783		168		2,951		168		3,048		137
Commercial equipment		1,538		1,048		467		1,515		303		1,578		73
Total	$	43,618	$	39,028	$	4,226	$	43,254	$	1,024	$	44,159	$	1,829

	September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Recorded Investment With No Allowance		Recorded Investment With Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Quarter Average Recorded Investment		Quarter Interest Income Recognized		YTD Average Recorded Investment		YTD Interest Income Recognized

Commercial real estate	$	24,233	$	19,824	$	4,211	$	24,035	$	155	$	24,153	$	319	$	24,399	$	799
Residential first mortgages		2,277		1,808		463		2,271		7		2,284		18		2,302		67
Residential rentals		2,669		2,271		397		2,668		21		2,673		22		2,711		77
Construction and land dev.		729		-		729		729		163		729		9		729		16
Home equity and second mtg.		225		225		-		225		-		225		2		226		5
Commercial loans		2,324		2,096		169		2,265		169		2,298		24		2,317		71
Commercial equipment		530		40		467		507		303		522		1		530		10
Total	$	32,987	$	26,264	$	6,436	$	32,700	$	818	$	32,884	$	395	$	33,214	$	1,045

TDRs, included in the impaired loan schedules above, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Dollars		Number of Loans		Dollars			Number of Loans

Commercial real estate	$	8,345		8	$	9,273			9
Residential first mortgages		512		2		527			2
Residential rentals		218		1		221			1
Construction and land development		729		2		729			2
Commercial loans		3		1		4			1
Commercial equipment		32		1		36			1
Total TDRs	$	9,839		15	$	10,790			16
Less: TDRs included in non-accrual loans		-		-		(769	)		(1	)
Total accrual TDR loans	$	9,839		15	$	10,021			15

TDRs decreased $951,000 due to principal paydowns and payoffs for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. There were no TDRs added during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company had specific reserves of $174,000 on one TDRs totaling $1.6 million at September 30, 2018. The Company had specific reserves of $413,000 on seven TDRs totaling $3.0 million at December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, TDR disposals, which included payoffs and refinancing decreased by seven loans totaling $3.9 million, of which $3.0 million related to the foreclosure of a stalled residential development project. TDR loan principal curtailment was $385,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no TDRs added during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables detail activity in the allowance for loan losses at and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. An allocation of the allowance to one category of loans does not prevent the Company from using that allowance to absorb losses in a different category.

	September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
Three Months Ended
Commercial real estate	$	6,563	$	(32	)	$	2	$	179		$	6,712
Residential first mortgages		737		(2	)		-		(44	)		691
Residential rentals		469		(54	)		-		170			585
Construction and land development		498		-			-		(203	)		295
Home equity and second mortgages		104		-			2		71			177
Commercial loans		1,203		2			176		(167	)		1,214
Consumer loans		7		(1	)		-		(1	)		5
Commercial equipment		1,144		(132	)		13		35			1,060
	$	10,725	$	(219	)	$	193	$	40		$	10,739

Purchase Credit Impaired**	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-

Nine Months Ended
Commercial real estate	$	6,451	$	(268	)	$	8	$	521		$	6,712
Residential first mortgages		1,144		(115	)		-		(338	)		691
Residential rentals		512		(54	)		-		127			585
Construction and land development		462		-			-		(167	)		295
Home equity and second mortgages		162		(7	)		16		6			177
Commercial loans		1,013		(86	)		176		111			1,214
Consumer loans		7		(2	)		-		-			5
Commercial equipment		764		(431	)		47		680			1,060
	$	10,515	$	(963	)	$	247	$	940		$	10,739
Purchase Credit Impaired**	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-

** There is no allowance for loan loss on the PCI portfolios. A more detailed rollforward schedule will be presented if an allowance is required.

	September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
Three Months Ended
Commercial real estate	$	6,085	$	(217	)	$	4	$	436		$	6,308
Residential first mortgages		1,300		-			-		(43	)		1,257
Residential rentals		335		-			-		289			624
Construction and land development		720		(1	)		-		(73	)		646
Home equity and second mortgages		112		(13	)		1		28			128
Commercial loans		814		-			-		(23	)		791
Consumer loans		5		-			-		2			7
Commercial equipment		1,063		(22	)		25		(392	)		674
	$	10,434	$	(253	)	$	30	$	224		$	10,435

Nine Months Ended
Commercial real estate	$	5,212	$	(217	)	$	13	$	1,300		$	6,308
Residential first mortgages		1,406		-			-		(149	)		1,257
Residential rentals		362		(42	)		-		304			624
Construction and land development		941		(26	)		-		(269	)		646
Home equity and second mortgages		138		(14	)		1		3			128
Commercial loans		794		-			1		(4	)		791
Consumer loans		3		(2	)		-		6			7
Commercial equipment		1,004		(168	)		49		(211	)		674
	$	9,860	$	(469	)	$	64	$	980		$	10,435

The following tables detail loan receivable and allowance balances disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology at September 30, 2018 and 2017 and December 31, 2017.

	September 30, 2018								December 31, 2017						September 30, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		Purchase Credit Impaired		Total		Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		Total		Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
Loan Receivables:
Commercial real estate	$	26,225	$	820,257	$	1,463	$	847,945	$	32,929	$	694,385	$	727,314	$	24,035	$	688,805	$	712,840
Residential first mortgages		2,616		153,481		468		156,565		2,437		167,937		170,374		2,271		173,545		175,816
Residential rentals		1,377		122,745		1,261		125,383		2,376		107,852		110,228		2,668		108,237		110,905
Construction and land development		729		28,059		-		28,788		729		27,142		27,871		729		30,365		31,094
Home equity and second mortgages		293		35,748		319		36,360		317		21,034		21,351		225		22,109		22,334
Commercial loans		2,773		59,310		-		62,083		2,951		53,466		56,417		2,265		54,111		56,376
Consumer loans		1		729		-		730		-		573		573		-		541		541
Commercial equipment		1,534		48,349		-		49,883		1,515		34,401		35,916		507		34,993		35,500
	$	35,548	$	1,268,678	$	3,511	$	1,307,737	$	43,254	$	1,106,790	$	1,150,044	$	32,700	$	1,112,706	$	1,145,406

Allowance for loan losses:
Commercial real estate	$	174	$	6,538	$	-	$	6,712	$	370	$	6,081	$	6,451	$	155	$	6,153	$	6,308
Residential first mortgages		-		691		-		691		2		1,142		1,144		7		1,250		1,257
Residential rentals		-		585		-		585		18		494		512		21		603		624
Construction and land development		-		295		-		295		163		299		462		163		483		646
Home equity and second mortgages		-		177		-		177		-		162		162		-		128		128
Commercial loans		458		756		-		1,214		168		845		1,013		169		622		791
Consumer loans		1		4		-		5		-		7		7		-		7		7
Commercial equipment		377		683		-		1,060		303		461		764		303		371		674
	$	1,010	$	9,729	$	-	$	10,739	$	1,024	$	9,491	$	10,515	$	818	$	9,617	$	10,435

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company expanded its factor scoring categories from three levels to five levels to capture additional movements in qualitative factors used to calculate the general allowance of each portfolio segment. No additional qualitative factors were added to the Company’s methodology as part of this change. There were no material changes to the existing allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment or in the aggregate as a result of the change.

Credit Quality Indicators

Credit quality indicators as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

	Commercial Real Estate				Construction and Land Dev.				Residential Rentals
(dollars in thousands)	9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017

Unrated	$	111,356	$	75,581	$	2,320	$	1,775	$	36,332	$	28,428
Pass		715,844		619,604		25,739		25,367		87,905		80,279
Special mention		-		-		-		-		-		-
Substandard		20,745		32,129		729		729		1,146		1,521
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	847,945	$	727,314	$	28,788	$	27,871	$	125,383	$	110,228

	Commercial Loans				Commercial Equipment				Total Commercial Portfolios
(dollars in thousands)	9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017

Unrated	$	19,507	$	14,356	$	14,495	$	10,856	$	184,010	$	130,996
Pass		39,811		39,118		33,934		23,581		903,233		787,949
Special mention		-		-		-		-		-		-
Substandard		2,765		2,943		1,454		1,479		26,839		38,801
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	62,083	$	56,417	$	49,883	$	35,916	$	1,114,082	$	957,746

	Non-Commercial Portfolios **				Total All Portfolios
(dollars in thousands)	9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017

Unrated	$	144,803	$	152,616	$	328,813	$	283,612
Pass		47,051		38,081		950,284		826,030
Special mention		-		96		-		96
Substandard		1,801		1,505		28,640		40,306
Doubtful		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-
Total	$	193,655	$	192,298	$	1,307,737	$	1,150,044

** Non-commercial portfolios are generally evaluated based on payment activity, but may be risk graded if part of a larger commercial relationship or are credit impaired (e,g. non-accrual loans, TDRs).

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity

	Residential First Mortgages				Home Equity and Second Mtg.				Consumer Loans
(dollars in thousands)	9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2018		12/31/2017

Performing	$	156,362	$	169,896	$	36,210	$	21,217	$	730	$	573
Nonperforming		203		478		150		134		-		-
Total	$	156,565	$	170,374	$	36,360	$	21,351	$	730	$	573

A risk grading scale is used to assign grades to commercial relationships, which include commercial real estate, residential rentals, construction and land development, commercial loans and commercial equipment loans. Loans are graded at inception, annually thereafter when financial statements are received and at other times when there is an indication that a credit may have weakened or improved. Only commercial loan relationships with an aggregate exposure to the Bank of $1,000,000 or greater are subject to being risk rated.

Home equity and second mortgages and consumer loans are evaluated for creditworthiness in underwriting and are monitored based on borrower payment history. Residential first mortgages are evaluated for creditworthiness during credit due diligence before being purchased. Residential first mortgages, home equity and second mortgages and consumer loans are classified as unrated unless they are part of a larger commercial relationship that requires grading or are TDRs or nonperforming loans with an Other Assets Especially Mentioned (“OAEM”) or higher risk rating due to a delinquent payment history.

Management regularly reviews credit quality indicators as part of its individual loan reviews and on a monthly and quarterly basis. The overall quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio is assessed using the Bank’s risk grading scale, the level and trends of net charge-offs, nonperforming loans and delinquencies, the performance of TDRs and the general economic conditions in the Company’s geographical market. This review process is assisted by frequent internal reporting of loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming and potential problem loans. Credit quality indicators and allowance factors are adjusted based on management’s judgment during the monthly and quarterly review process. Loans subject to risk ratings are graded on a scale of one to ten. The Company considers loans rated substandard, doubtful and loss as classified assets for regulatory and financial reporting.

Ratings 1 thru 6 - Pass

Ratings 1 thru 6 have asset risks ranging from excellent low risk to adequate. The specific rating assigned considers customer history of earnings, cash flows, liquidity, leverage, capitalization, consistency of debt service coverage, the nature and extent of customer relationship and other relevant specific business factors such as the stability of the industry or market area, changes to management, litigation or unexpected events that could have an impact on risks.

Rating 7 - OAEM (Other Assets Especially Mentioned) – Special Mention

These credits, while protected by the financial strength of the borrowers, guarantors or collateral, have reduced quality due to economic conditions, less than adequate earnings performance or other factors which require the lending officer to direct more than normal attention to the credit. Financing alternatives may be limited and/or command higher risk interest rates. OAEM loans are the first adversely classified assets on our watch list. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 8 - Substandard

Substandard assets are assets that are inadequately protected by the sound worth or paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. These assets have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified substandard. The loans may have a delinquent history or combination of weak collateral, weak guarantor strength or operating losses. When a loan is assigned to this category the Bank may estimate a specific reserve in the loan loss allowance analysis. These assets listed may include assets with histories of repossessions or some that are non-performing bankruptcies. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 9 - Doubtful

Doubtful assets have many of the same characteristics of Substandard with the exception that the Bank has determined that loss is not only possible but is probable and the risk is close to certain that loss will occur. When a loan is assigned to this category the Bank will identify the probable loss and the loan will receive a specific reserve in the loan loss allowance analysis. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 10 – Loss

Once an asset is identified as a definite loss to the Bank, it will receive the classification of “loss.” There may be some future potential recovery; however, it is more practical to write off the loan at the time of classification. Losses will be taken in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectable.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans and Acquired Loans

PCI loans had an unpaid principal balance of $4.5 million and a carrying value of $3.5 million at September 30, 2018. PCI loans represented 0.20% of total assets at September 30, 2018. Determining the fair value of the PCI loans at the time of acquisition required the Company to estimate cash flows expected to result from those loans and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest taking into account prepayment assumptions. For such loans, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over the remaining lives of the loans and is called accretable yield. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of estimated credit losses and is called the nonaccretable difference. In accordance with GAAP, there was no carryover of previously established allowance for loan losses from acquisition. In conjunction with the acquisition of County First, the PCI loan portfolio was accounted for at fair value as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	January 1, 2018

Contractual principal and interest at acquisition	$	6,126
Nonaccretable difference		(1,093	)
Expected cash flows at acquisition		5,033
Accretable yield		(517	)
Basis in PCI loans at acquisition - estimated fair value	$	4,516

A summary of changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 follows:

	Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018			September 30, 2018
Accretable yield, beginning of period	$	401		$	-
Additions		-			517
Accretion		(54	)		(170	)
Reclassification from (to) nonaccretable difference		-			-
Other changes, net		-			-
Accretable yield, end of period	$	347		$	347

Loans consist of: (i) non-acquired loans, which include certain renewed and/or restructured acquired performing loans that are re-designated as non-acquired of $1,197.1 million at September 30, 2018; (ii) acquired performing loans were $107.1 million at September 30, 2018; and (iii) purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans were $3.5 million at September 30, 2018. At September 30, 2018, performing acquired loans, which totaled $107.1 million, included a $2.0 million net acquisition accounting fair market value adjustment, representing a 1.83% “mark;” and PCI loans which totaled $3.5 million, included a $671,000 adjustment, representing a 16.04% “mark.” During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 there was $161,000 and $635,000, respectively, of accretion interest.

The following is a summary of acquired and non-acquired loans as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

BY ACQUIRED AND NON-ACQUIRED	September 30, 2018		%			December 31, 2017		%
Acquired loans - performing	$	107,142		8.19	%	$	-		0.00	%
Acquired loans - purchase credit impaired ("PCI")		3,511		0.27	%		-		0.00	%
Total acquired loans		110,653		8.46	%		-		0.00	%
Non-acquired loans**		1,197,084		91.54	%		1,150,044		100.00	%
Gross loans		1,307,737					1,150,044
Net deferred costs (fees)		917		0.07	%		1,086		0.09	%
Total loans, net of deferred costs	$	1,308,654				$	1,151,130

** Non-acquired loans include loans transferred from acquired pools following release of acquisition accounting FMV adjustments.

NOTE 12 – REGULATORY CAPITAL

On April 18, 2016, the Bank’s primary regulator became the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation (the “Commissioner”) and the FDIC. The Company is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.

On January 1, 2015, the Company and Bank became subject to the new Basel III Capital Rules with full compliance with all of the final rule's requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule, to be fully phased-in by January 1, 2019. In July 2013, the final rules were published (the “Basel III Capital Rules”) establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations. The rules implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework known as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards as well as certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Basel III Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions compared to the previous U.S. risk-based capital rules. The Basel III Capital Rules define the components of capital and address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The Basel III Capital Rules also address risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replace the existing risk-weighting approach with a more risk-sensitive approach. The Basel III Capital Rules also implement the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking agencies’ rules.

The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets minimum ratio of 4.5%, raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0%, require a minimum ratio (“Min. Ratio”) of Total Capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, and require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. A new capital conservation buffer (“CCB”) is also established above the regulatory minimum capital requirements. This capital conservation buffer began its phase-in period beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each subsequent year by an additional 0.625% until reaching its final level of 2.5% on January 1, 2019. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the final rules. The final rules also revise the definition and calculation of Tier 1 capital, Total Capital, and risk-weighted assets.

As of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the Company and Bank were well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action under the Basel III Capital Rules. Management believes, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.

Regulatory Capital and Ratios	The Company					The Bank
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017		September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Common equity	$	150,148		$	109,957	$	180,620		$	139,046
Goodwill		(10,708	)		-		(10,708	)		-
Core deposit intangible (net of deferred tax liability)		(2,169	)		-		(2,169	)		-
AOCI losses		2,633			1,191		2,633			1,191
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital		139,904			111,148		170,376			140,237
TRUPs		12,000			12,000		-			-
Tier 1 Capital		151,904			123,148		170,376			140,237
Allowable reserve for credit losses and other Tier 2 adjustments		10,790			10,545		10,790			10,545
Subordinated notes		23,000			23,000		-			-
Tier 2 Capital	$	185,694		$	156,693	$	181,166		$	150,782

Risk-Weighted Assets ("RWA")	$	1,358,171		$	1,169,341	$	1,354,942		$	1,164,478

Average Assets ("AA")	$	1,596,550		$	1,401,741	$	1,593,387		$	1,398,001

2019 Regulatory Min. Ratio + CCB ⁽¹⁾
Common Tier 1 Capital to RWA	7.00	%	10.30	%	9.51	%	12.57	%	12.04	%
Tier 1 Capital to RWA	8.50		11.18		10.53		12.57		12.04
Tier 2 Capital to RWA	10.50		13.67		13.40		13.37		12.95
Tier 1 Capital to AA (Leverage) ⁽²⁾	n/a		9.51		8.79		10.69		10.03

⁽¹⁾ These are the fully phased-in ratios as of January 1, 2019 that include the minimum capital ratio ("Min. Ratio") + the capital conservation buffer ("CCB"). The phase-in period is more fully described in the footnote above.

⁽²⁾ Tier 1 Capital to AA (Leverage) has no capital conservation buffer defined. PCA well capitalized is defined as 5.00%.

NOTE 13 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements” and FASB ASC Topic 825, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which provides a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. FASB ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet in periods subsequent to initial recognition, whether the measurements are made on a recurring basis (for example, available for sale investment securities) or on a nonrecurring basis (for example, impaired loans).

FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis such as loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Under FASB ASC Topic 820, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine the fair value. These hierarchy levels are:

Level 1 inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with the Company’s quarterly valuation process. Transfers in and out of level 3 during a quarter are disclosed. There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 in the fair value hierarchy during the nine months ending September 30, 2018.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value:

Securities Available for Sale

Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Standard inputs include quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities (“GSEs”), municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Equity Securities Carried at Fair Value Through Income

Equity securities carried at fair value through income are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Standard inputs include quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 equity securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 2 equity securities include mutual funds with asset-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities (“GSEs”) as the underlying investment supporting the fund. Equity securities classified as Level 3 include mutual funds with asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Loans Receivable

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis, however, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan loss is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan are considered impaired. Management estimates the fair value of impaired loans using one of several methods, including the collateral value, market value of similar debt, or discounted cash flows. Impaired loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair value of expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investment in such loans. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, substantially all of the impaired loans were evaluated based upon the fair value of the collateral.

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral (loans with impairment) require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price (e.g., contracted sales price), the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When the fair value of the impaired loan is derived from an appraisal, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 3. Fair value is re-assessed at least quarterly or more frequently when circumstances occur that indicate a change in the fair value. The fair values of impaired loans that are not measured based on collateral values are measured using discounted cash flows and considered to be Level 3 inputs.

Premises and Equipment Held For Sale

Premises and equipment are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the assets to premises and equipment held for sale. Subsequently, premises and equipment held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price (e.g., contracted sales price), the Company records the asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When the fair value of premises and equipment is derived from an appraisal or a cash flow analysis, the Company records the asset at nonrecurring Level 3.

There were no premises and equipment held for sale as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

OREO is adjusted for fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price (e.g., contracted sales price), the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When the fair value is derived from an appraisal, the Company records the foreclosed asset at nonrecurring Level 3.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The tables below present the recorded amount of assets as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available for sale securities
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
CMOs	$	89,432	$	-	$	89,432	$	-
MBS		6,349		-		6,349		-
U.S. Agency		12,181		-		12,181		-
Total available for sale securities	$	107,962	$	-	$	107,962	$	-

Equity securities carried at fair value through income
CRA investment fund	$	4,359	$	-	$	4,359	$	-

(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2017
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available for sale securities
Asset-backed securities issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies
CMOs	$	44,137	$	-		44,137	$	-
MBS		7,087		-		7,087		-
U.S. Agency		12,517		-		12,517		-
Bond mutual funds		4,423		-		4,423		-
Total available for sale securities	$	68,164	$	-	$	68,164	$	-

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were included in the tables below.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans with impairment
Commercial real estate	$	1,387	$	-	$	-	$	1,387
Commercial loans		425		-		-		425
Commercial equipment		25		-		-		25
Total loans with impairment	$	1,837	$	-	$	-	$	1,837
Other real estate owned	$	8,207	$	-	$	-	$	8,207

(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2017
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans with impairment
Commercial real estate	$	1,638	$	-	$	-	$	1,638
Residential first mortgages		457		-		-		457
Residential rentals		377		-		-		377
Construction and land development		566		-		-		566
Commercial loans		164		-		-		164
Total loans with impairment	$	3,202	$	-	$	-	$	3,202
Other real estate owned	$	9,341	$	-	$	-	$	9,341

Loans with impairment had unpaid principal balances of $2.8 million and $4.2 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and include impaired loans with a specific allowance.

The following tables provide information describing the unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands)
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)

Loans with impairment	$	1,837	Third party appraisals and in-house real estate evaluations of fair value	Management discount for property type and current market conditions	0%-50% (35%)
Other real estate owned	$	8,207	Third party appraisals and in-house real estate evaluations of fair value	Management discount for property type and current market conditions	0%-50% (13%)

December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)
Description of Asset	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)

Loans with impairment	$	3,202	Third party appraisals and in-house real estate evaluations of fair value	Management discount for property type and current market conditions	0%-50% (24%)

Other real estate owned	$	9,341	Third party appraisals and in-house real estate evaluations of fair value	Management discount for property type and current market conditions	0%-50% (12%)

NOTE 14 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments require disclosure of fair value information, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, when it is practical to estimate the fair value. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity or a contractual obligation which requires the exchange of cash. Certain items are specifically excluded from the financial instrument fair value disclosure requirements, including the Company’s common stock, OREO, premises and equipment and other assets and liabilities.

The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. Therefore, any aggregate unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings or cash flows. Furthermore, the fair values disclosed should not be interpreted as the aggregate current value of the Company.

Valuation Methodology

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company implemented “ASU 2016-01 - Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The other requirements of ASU 2016-01 are described in Note 1. The standard update was adopted prospectively and the December 31, 2017 valuations reflect the methodologies used prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01. Fair values at September 30, 2018 were measured using an “exit price” notion.

Prior to adopting the amendments included in the standard, the Company measured fair value under an entry price notion. The entry price notion previously applied by the Company used a discounted cash flows technique for loans, time deposits and debt, to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows for financial instruments. See the Company’s methodologies disclosed in Note 20 of the Company’s 2017 Form 10-K for the fair value methodologies used as of December 31, 2017.

The exit price notion uses a similar approach as the Company’s previous methodology for valuations that used discounted cash flows, but also incorporates other factors, such as enhanced credit risk, illiquidity risk and market factors that sometimes exist in exit prices in dislocated markets. The implementation of ASU 2016-01 was most impactful to the Company’s loan portfolio because the Company’s other financial instruments have one or several other compensating factors (e.g., quoted market prices, lower credit risk, limited liquidity risk, short durations, etc.).

As of September 30, 2018, the technique used by the Company to estimate the exit price of the loan portfolio consisted of similar procedures to those used as of December 31, 2017, but with added emphasis on both illiquidity risk and credit risk not captured by the previously applied entry price notion. This credit risk assumption is intended to approximate the fair value that a market participant would realize in a hypothetical orderly transaction. The Company’s loan portfolio is initially fair valued using a segmented approach, using the eight categories as disclosed in Note 11. Loans are considered a Level 3 classification.

The following summarizes the valuation methodologies used as of September 30, 2018:

Investment securities and equity securities carried at fair value through income - Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

FHLB stock and non-marketable equity securities held at other financial institutions – Fair values are at cost, which is the carrying value of the securities.

Investment in bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) – Fair values are at cash surrender value.

Loans receivable – The fair values for non-impaired loans are estimated using credit loss severity rates derived from market data, discount rates based on recent originations and market data, and prepayment speeds based on market data. The credit mark, discount rate and prepayment assumptions all consider segmentation and product attributes, such as duration and interest rates (e.g., fixed vs. variable interest).

Management estimates the fair value of impaired loans using one of several methods, including the collateral value, market value of similar debt or discounted cash flows. These loans are not valued using the method described for non-impaired loans because management believes the identification of impaired loans and specific allowance, if needed, approximates fair value.

Loans held for sale – Fair values are derived from secondary market quotations for similar instruments. There were no loans held for sale at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Deposits - The fair value of checking accounts, saving accounts and money market accounts were the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Time certificates - The fair value was determined using the recent issuance rates and market rate analysis on similar products to determine a discount rate.

FHLB - Long-term debt and short-term borrowings – The fair value was determined by applying the prepayment penalty and accrued interest payable of the specific borrowings.

Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated securities (TRUPs) - The fair value was determined using the recent issuance rates for trust preferred or similar borrowings to determine a discount rate.

Subordinated notes - The fair value was determined using the recent issuance rates for subordinated debt or similar borrowings to determine a discount rate.

Off-balance sheet instruments - The Company charges fees for commitments to extend credit. Interest rates on loans for which these commitments are extended are normally committed for periods of less than one month. Fees charged on standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are deemed to be immaterial and these guarantees are expected to be settled at face amount or expire unused.

The Company’s estimated fair values of financial instruments are presented in the following tables.

September 30, 2018	Carrying				Fair Value Measurements
Description of Asset (dollars in thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investment securities - AFS	$	107,962	$	107,962	$	-	$	107,962	$	-
Investment securities - HTM		97,217		93,811		994		92,817		-
Equity securities carried at fair value through income		4,359		4,359		-		4,359		-
Non-marketable equity securities in other financial institutions		249		249				249
FHLB Stock		2,547		2,547		-		2,547		-
Net loans receivable		1,297,915		1,263,046		-		-		1,263,046
Investment in BOLI		36,071		36,071		-		36,071		-

Liabilities
Savings, NOW and money market accounts	$	1,010,492	$	1,010,492	$	-	$	1,010,492	$	-
Time deposits		441,879		440,159		-		440,159		-
Long-term debt		20,451		20,419		-		20,419		-
Short term borrowings		5,000		4,998		-		4,998		-
TRUPs		12,000		10,717		-		10,717		-
Subordinated notes		23,000		23,133		-		23,133		-

See the Company’s methodologies disclosed in Note 20 of the Company’s 2017 Form 10-K for the fair value methodologies used as of December 31, 2017:

December 31, 2017	Carrying				Fair Value Measurements
Description of Asset (dollars in thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investment securities - AFS	$	68,164	$	68,164	$	-	$	68,164	$	-
Investment securities - HTM		99,246		98,007		1,000		97,007		-
Non-marketable equity securities in other financial institutions		121		121		-		121		-
FHLB Stock		7,276		7,276		-		7,276		-
Net loans receivable		1,140,615		1,097,592		-		-		1,097,592
Investment in BOLI		29,398		29,398		-		29,398		-

Liabilities
Savings, NOW and money market accounts	$	654,632	$	654,632	$	-	$	654,632	$	-
Time deposits		451,605		453,644		-		453,644		-
Long-term debt		55,498		57,421		-		57,421		-
Short term borrowings		87,500		87,208		-		87,208		-
TRUPs		12,000		9,400		-		9,400		-
Subordinated notes		23,000		22,400		-		22,400		-

At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding loan commitments and standby letters of credit of $35.5 million and $65.6 million, respectively and $23.0 million and $17.9 million, respectively. Additionally, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, customers had $225.1 million and $162.2 million, respectively, available and unused on lines of credit, which include lines of credit for commercial customers, home equity loans as well as builder and construction lines. Based on the short-term lives of these instruments, the Company does not believe that the fair value of these instruments differs significantly from their carrying values.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amount presented herein.

Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Report may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words like “is optimistic”, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and “intend” or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Statements in this report that are not strictly historical are forward-looking and are based upon current expectations that may differ materially from actual results. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to the Company’s and Community Bank of the Chesapeake’s future growth and management’s outlook or expectations for revenue, assets, asset quality, profitability, business prospects, net interest margin, non-interest revenue, allowance for loan losses, the level of credit losses from lending, liquidity levels, capital levels, or other future financial or business performance strategies or expectations, and any statements of the plans and objectives of management for future operations products or services, including the expected benefits from, and/or the execution of integration plans relating to the County First acquisition; plans and cost savings regarding branch closings or consolidation; any statement of expectation or belief; projections related to certain financial metrics; and any statement of assumptions underlying the foregoing. These forward-looking statements express management’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, results and conditions, and by their nature are subject to and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the statements made herein. Factors that might cause actual results to differ materially from those made in such statements include, but are not limited to: the synergies and other expected financial benefits from County First acquisition may not be realized within the expected time frames; changes in The Community Financial Corporation or Community Bank of the Chesapeake’s strategy; costs or difficulties related to integration matters might be greater than expected; availability of and costs associated with obtaining adequate and timely sources of liquidity; the ability to maintain credit quality; general economic trends; changes in interest rates; loss of deposits and loan demand to other financial institutions; substantial changes in financial markets; changes in real estate value and the real estate market; regulatory changes; the possibility of unforeseen events affecting the industry generally; the uncertainties associated with newly developed or acquired operations; the outcome of litigation that may arise; market disruptions and other effects of terrorist activities; and the matters described in “Item 1A Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017, and in its other Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company’s forward-looking statements may also be subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those that it may discuss elsewhere in this Report or in its filings with the SEC, accessible on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unforeseen events, except as required under the rules and regulations of the SEC.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this document in that actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements, due to a variety of factors. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this Report, and we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report. Forward-looking statements regarding the transaction are based upon currently available information.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgments and uncertainties and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. The Company considers its determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed real estate (OREO) and the valuation of deferred tax assets to be critical accounting policies.

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the general practices of the United States banking industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.

Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. When these sources are not available, management makes estimates based upon what it considers to be the best available information.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that exist in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two principles of accounting: (1) Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 450 “Contingencies,” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and are estimable and (2) FASB ASC 310 “Receivables,” which requires that losses be accrued when it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments according to the contractual terms of the loan. The loss, if any, is determined by the difference between the loan balance and the value of collateral, the present value of expected future cash flows and values observable in the secondary markets.

The allowance for loan loss balance is an estimate based upon management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio. The allowance includes a specific and a general component. The specific component consists of management’s evaluation of certain classified and non-accrual loans and their underlying collateral. Management assesses the ability of the borrower to repay the loan based upon all information available. Loans are examined to determine a specific allowance based upon the borrower’s payment history, economic conditions specific to the loan or borrower and other factors that would impact the borrower’s ability to repay the loan on its contractual basis. Depending on the assessment of the borrower’s ability to pay and the type, condition and value of collateral, management will establish an allowance amount specific to the loan.

Management uses a risk scale to assign grades to commercial relationships, which include commercial real estate, residential rentals, construction and land development, commercial loans and commercial equipment loans. Commercial loan relationships with an aggregate exposure to the Bank of $1,000,000 or greater are risk rated. Residential first mortgages, home equity and second mortgages and consumer loans are monitored on an ongoing basis based on borrower payment history. Consumer loans and residential real estate loans are classified as unrated unless they are part of a larger commercial relationship that requires grading or are troubled debt restructures or nonperforming loans with an Other Assets Especially Mentioned or higher risk rating due to a delinquent payment history.

The Company’s commercial loan portfolio is periodically reviewed by regulators and independent consultants engaged by management.

In establishing the general component of the allowance, management analyzes non-impaired loans in the portfolio including changes in the amount and type of loans. This analysis reviews trends by portfolio segment in charge-offs, delinquency, classified loans, loan concentrations and the rate of portfolio segment growth. Qualitative factors also include an assessment of the current regulatory environment, the quality of credit administration and loan portfolio management and national and local economic trends. Based upon this analysis a loss factor is applied to each loan category and the Bank adjusts the loan loss allowance by increasing or decreasing the provision for loan losses.

Management has significant discretion in making the judgments inherent in the determination of the allowance for loan losses, including the valuation of collateral, assessing a borrower’s prospects of repayment and in establishing loss factors on the general component of the allowance. Changes in loss factors have a direct impact on the amount of the provision and on net income. Errors in management’s assessment of the global factors and their impact on the portfolio could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio and may result in additional provisions. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the allowance for loan losses was $10.7 million and $10.5 million, respectively, or 0.82% and 0.91%, respectively, of total loans. Allowance for loan loss as a percentage of loans decreased in first nine months of 2018, primarily due to the addition of County First loans, after consummation of the legal merger on January 1, 2018, for which no allowance was provided for in accordance with purchase accounting standards. An increase or decrease in the allowance could result in a charge or credit to income before income taxes that materially impacts earnings.

For additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses, refer to Notes 1 and 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements as presented in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the discussion in this MD&A.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

The Company maintains a valuation allowance on its other real estate owned. As with the allowance for loan losses, the valuation allowance on OREO is based on FASB ASC 450 “Contingencies,” as well as the accounting guidance on impairment of long-lived assets. These statements require that the Company establish a valuation allowance when it has determined that the carrying amount of a foreclosed asset exceeds its fair value. Fair value of a foreclosed asset is measured by the cash flows expected to be realized from its subsequent disposition. These cash flows include the costs of selling or otherwise disposing of the asset.

In estimating the fair value of OREO, management must make significant assumptions regarding the timing and amount of cash flows. For example, in cases where the real estate acquired is undeveloped land, management must gather the best available evidence regarding the market value of the property, including appraisals, cost estimates of development and broker opinions. Due to the highly subjective nature of this evidence, as well as the limited market, long time periods involved and substantial risks, cash flow estimates are highly subjective and subject to change. Errors regarding any aspect of the costs or proceeds of developing, selling or otherwise disposing of foreclosed real estate could result in the allowance being inadequate to reduce carrying costs to fair value and may require an additional provision for valuation allowances.

For additional information regarding OREO, refer to Notes 1 and 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements as presented in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Deferred Tax Assets

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. FASB ASC 740 requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Management periodically evaluates the ability of the Company to realize the value of its deferred tax assets. If management were to determine that it was not more likely than not that the Company would realize the full amount of the deferred tax assets, it would establish a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax asset to the amount it believes would be realized. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the Company’s forecast of future taxable income and available tax-planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.

Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income might affect the ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets. Factors that may affect the Company’s ability to achieve sufficient forecasted taxable income include, but are not limited to, the following: increased competition, a decline in net interest margin, a loss of market share, decreased demand for financial services and national and regional economic conditions.

The Company’s provision for income taxes and the determination of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities involve a significant amount of management judgment and are based on the best information available at the time. The Company operates within federal and state taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions.

For additional information regarding income taxes and deferred tax assets, refer to Notes 1 and 12 in the Consolidated Financial Statements as presented in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

ECONOMY

The presence of federal government agencies, as well as significant government facilities, and the related private sector support for these entities, has led to steady economic growth in our market and lower unemployment compared to national averages since the Great Recession. In addition, the Bank’s entry into the greater Annapolis and Fredericksburg markets has provided the Bank with additional loan and deposit opportunities. These opportunities have positively impacted the Bank’s organic growth.

Economic conditions, competition, and the monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal government significantly affect most financial institutions, including the Bank. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are influenced by levels of business spending and investment, consumer income, consumer spending and savings, capital market activities, and competition among financial institutions, as well as customer preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products in our market areas.

In 2017, the national economy continued to improve throughout the year. The economy (GDP) grew 2.30% in 2017, an increase from 1.50% GDP growth in 2016. Consumer confidence has increased due to positive economic trends such as lower unemployment, increased housing metrics and solid performance in the financial markets. The Mid-Atlantic region in which the Company operates continued to experience continued improved regional economic performance. The economy has continued to grow in 2018 with annualized GDP growth at the end of the third quarter in excess of 3%. The presence of several major federal facilities located within the Bank’s footprint and in adjoining counties contribute to economic growth. Major federal facilities include the Patuxent River Naval Air Station in St. Mary’s County, the Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center in Charles County and the Naval Surface Warfare –Naval Support Facility in King George County. In addition, there are several major federal facilities located in adjoining markets including Andrews Air Force Base and Defense Intelligence Agency & Defense Intelligence Analysis Center in Prince Georges County, Maryland and the U.S. Marine Base Quantico, Drug Enforcement Administration Quantico facility and Federal Bureau of Investigation Quantico facility in Prince William County, Virginia. These facilities directly employ thousands of local employees and serve as an important player in the region’s overall economic health.

The economic health of the region, while stabilized by the influence of the federal government, is not solely dependent on this sector. Calvert County is home to the Dominion Power Cove Point Liquid Natural Gas Terminal, which is one of the nation’s largest liquefied natural gas terminals and Dominion Power is currently constructing liquefaction facilities for exporting liquefied natural gas. Based on information from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment rates and household income in the Company’s footprint have historically performed better than the national average. According to SNL Financial, the median household income in our market area is $97,000 compared to $61,000 for the United States. According to SNL Financial, the Bank’s market areas have strong demographics with below average unemployment rates. The Bank’s primary market areas have unemployment rates below 3.6% with projected population growth in excess of 4.25% over the next five years.

The greater Fredericksburg area, the Bank’s newest area of expansion (2013), continued to experience economic growth. According to the Fredericksburg Regional Alliance, the Fredericksburg Region, including the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Caroline, King George, Spotsylvania, and Stafford, Virginia, has been the fastest growing region in the Commonwealth of Virginia for the last five years.

For additional information regarding the local economy and its impact on the Company’s business refer to the Business Section in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 under the caption “Market Area” (Part I. Item 1. Business Section – Market Area).

USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Statements included in management’s discussion and analysis include non-GAAP financial measures and should be read along with the accompanying tables, which provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. The Company’s management uses these non-GAAP financial measures and believes that non-GAAP financial measures provide additional useful information that allows readers to evaluate the ongoing performance of the Company. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance or financial condition as promulgated under GAAP, and investors should consider the Company’s performance and financial condition as reported under GAAP and all other relevant information when assessing the performance or financial condition of the Company. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools, and investors should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the results or financial condition as reported under GAAP. See Non-GAAP reconciliation schedules that immediately follow:

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES (UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED

Reconciliation of US GAAP Net Income, Earnings Per Share (EPS), Return on Average Assets (ROAA) and Return on Average Common Equity (ROACE) to Non-GAAP Operating Net Income, EPS, ROAA and ROACE

This 10-Q, including the accompanying financial statement tables, contains financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. This financial information includes certain operating performance measures, which exclude merger and acquisition costs and the fourth quarter 2017 income tax expense attributable to the revaluation of deferred tax assets as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate under the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. These expenses are not considered part of recurring operations, such as “operating net income,” “operating earnings per share,” “operating return on average assets,” and “operating return on average common equity.” These non-GAAP measures are included because the Company believes they may provide useful supplemental information for evaluating the underlying performance trends of the Company.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017			September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017

Net income (as reported)	$	3,858		$	2,782		$	7,414		$	7,667
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act		-			-			-			-
Merger and acquisition costs (net of tax)		8			257			2,689			494
Non-GAAP operating net income	$	3,866		$	3,039		$	10,103		$	8,161

Income before income taxes (as reported)	$	5,299		$	4,499		$	10,216		$	12,368
Merger and acquisition costs ("M&A")		11			239			3,620			494
Adjusted pretax income		5,310			4,738			13,836			12,862
Income tax expense		1,444			1,699			3,733			4,701
Non-GAAP operating net income	$	3,866		$	3,039		$	10,103		$	8,161

GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS")	$	0.70		$	0.60		$	1.34		$	1.65
Non-GAAP operating diluted EPS before M&A	$	0.70		$	0.66		$	1.82		$	1.76

GAAP return on average assets ("ROAA")		0.96	%		0.80	%		0.62	%		0.75	%
Non-GAAP operating ROAA before M&A		0.96	%		0.87	%		0.85	%		0.79	%

GAAP return on average common equity ("ROACE")		10.29	%		9.99	%		6.68	%		9.38	%
Non-GAAP operating ROACE before M&A		10.31	%		10.92	%		9.10	%		9.99	%

Net income (as reported)	$	3,858		$	2,782		$	7,414		$	7,667
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,551,184			4,633,417			5,550,020			4,633,500
Average assets	$	1,606,853		$	1,396,459		$	1,589,438		$	1,369,583
Average equity		150,013			111,357			148,022			108,956

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES (UNAUDITED)

Reconciliation of US GAAP total assets, common equity, common equity to assets and book value to Non-GAAP tangible assets, tangible common equity, tangible common equity to tangible assets and tangible book value.

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			September 30, 2017

Total assets	$	1,676,409		$	1,405,961		$	1,402,172
Less: intangible assets
Goodwill		10,708			-			-
Core deposit intangible		2,993			-			-
Total intangible assets		13,701			-			-
Tangible assets	$	1,662,708		$	1,405,961		$	1,402,172

Total common equity	$	150,148		$	109,957		$	110,885
Less: intangible assets		13,701			-			-
Tangible common equity	$	136,447		$	109,957		$	110,885

Common shares outstanding at end of period		5,575,024			4,649,658			4,649,302

GAAP common equity to assets		8.96	%		7.82	%		7.91	%
Non-GAAP tangible common equity to tangible assets		8.21	%		7.82	%		7.91	%

GAAP common book value per share	$	26.93		$	23.65		$	23.85
Non-GAAP tangible common book value per share	$	24.47		$	23.65		$	23.85

Selected Financial Information and Ratios

	Three Months Ended (Unaudited)						Nine Months Ended (Unaudited)
	September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017			September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017
KEY OPERATING RATIOS
Return on average assets		0.96	%		0.80	%		0.62	%		0.75	%
Return on average common equity		10.29			9.99			6.68			9.38
Average total equity to average total assets		9.34			7.97			9.31			7.96
Interest rate spread		3.22			3.24			3.26			3.26
Net interest margin		3.43			3.38			3.46			3.39
Cost of funds		1.03			0.84			0.94			0.79
Cost of deposits		0.84			0.58			0.74			0.53
Cost of debt		3.68			2.34			3.06			2.27
Efficiency ratio		61.40			61.18			72.83			62.57
Non-interest expense to average assets		2.11			2.13			2.51			2.17
Net operating expense to average assets		1.85			1.80			2.26			1.88
Avg. int-earning assets to avg. int-bearing liabilities		121.38			116.64			121.23			116.67
Net charge-offs to average loans		0.01			0.08			0.07			0.05
COMMON SHARE DATA
Basic net income per common share	$	0.70		$	0.60		$	1.34		$	1.66
Diluted net income per common share		0.70			0.60			1.34			1.65
Cash dividends paid per common share		0.10			0.10			0.20			0.20
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		5,551,184			4,633,391			5,550,020			4,631,571
Diluted		5,551,184			4,633,417			5,550,020			4,633,500

Selected Financial Information and Ratios (continued)

	(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			$ Change			% Change
ASSET QUALITY
Total assets	$	1,676,409		$	1,405,961		$	270,448			19.2	%
Gross loans		1,307,737			1,150,044			157,693			13.7
Classified Assets		37,369			50,298			(12,929	)		(25.7	)
Allowance for loan losses		10,739			10,515			224			2.1

Past due loans - 31 to 89 days		6,499			9,227			(2,728	)		(29.6	)
Past due loans >=90 days		9,666			2,483			7,183			289.3
Total past due (delinquency) loans		16,165			11,710			4,455			38.0

Non-accrual loans (a)		16,350			4,693			11,657			248.4
Accruing troubled debt restructures (TDRs) (b)		9,839			10,021			(182	)		(1.8	)
Other real estate owned (OREO)		8,207			9,341			(1,134	)		(12.1	)
Non-accrual loans, OREO and TDRs	$	34,396		$	24,055		$	10,341			43.0
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS
Classified assets to total assets		2.23	%		3.58	%
Classified assets to risk-based capital		20.12			32.10
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.82			0.91
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans		65.68			224.06
Past due loans - 31 to 89 days to total loans		0.50			0.80
Past due loans >=90 days to total loans		0.74			0.22
Total past due (delinquency) to total loans		1.24			1.02
Non-accrual loans to total loans		1.25			0.41
Non-accrual loans and TDRs to total loans		2.00			1.28
Non-accrual loans and OREO to total assets		1.46			1.00
Non-accrual loans, OREO and TDRs to total assets		2.05			1.71

Selected Financial Information and Ratios (continued)

	(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017

COMMON SHARE DATA
Book value per common share	$	26.93		$	23.65
Tangible book value per common share**		24.47			***
Common shares outstanding at end of period		5,575,024			4,649,658
OTHER DATA
Full-time equivalent employees		190			165
Branches (c)		12			11
Loan Production Offices		5			5
CAPITAL RATIOS
Tier 1 capital to average assets		9.51	%		8.79	%
Tier 1 common capital to risk-weighted assets		10.30			9.51
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		11.18			10.53
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets		13.67			13.40
Common equity to assets		8.96	%		7.82	%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets **		8.21	%		***

** Non-GAAP financial measure. See reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP measures.

*** The Company had no intangible assets before January 1, 2018.

(a) Non-accrual loans include all loans that are 90 days or more delinquent and loans that are non-accrual due to the operating results or cash flows of a customer. Non-accrual loans can include loans that are current with all loan payments.

(b) At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Bank had total TDRs of $9.8 million and $10.8 million, respectively, with $0 and $769,000, respectively, in non-accrual status. These loans are classified as non-accrual loans for the calculation of financial ratios.

OVERVIEW

Community Bank of the Chesapeake (the “Bank”) is headquartered in Southern Maryland with branches located in Maryland and Virginia. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Community Financial Corporation (the “Company”).

The Company’s branches are located at its main office in Waldorf, Maryland, and 11 branch offices¹ in Waldorf, Bryans Road, Dunkirk, Leonardtown, La Plata, Charlotte Hall, Prince Frederick, Lusby, California, Maryland; and Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Company maintains five loan production offices (“LPOs”) in Annapolis, La Plata, Prince Frederick and Leonardtown, Maryland; and Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Leonardtown LPO is co-located with the branch.

The Bank has increased assets primarily with organic loan growth until its first acquisition of County First Bank in January 2018. The Bank believes that its ability to offer fast, flexible, local decision-making will continue to attract significant new business relationships. The Bank focuses its business generation efforts on targeting small and medium sized commercial businesses with revenues between $5.0 million and $35.0 million as well as local municipal agencies and not-for-profits. Our business model is customer-focused, utilizing relationship teams to provide customers with specific banker contacts and a support team to address product and service demands. Our structure provides a consistent and superior level of professional service. As a community bank this is what gives us the competitive advantage. We consider excelling at customer service to be a critical part of our culture. The Bank’s marketing is also directed towards increasing its balances of transactional deposit accounts, which are all deposit accounts other than certificates of deposit. The Bank believes that increases in these account types will lessen the Bank’s dependence on higher-cost funding, such as certificates of deposit and borrowings. Although management believes that this strategy will increase financial performance over time, increasing the balances of certain products, such as commercial lending and transaction accounts, may also increase the Bank’s noninterest expense. The Bank recognizes that certain lending and deposit products increase the possibility of losses from credit and other risks.

The Company’s income is primarily earned from interest received on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, which is called our net interest spread. In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other charges to our clients.

On January 1, 2018, the Company completed its previously announced merger of County First with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving bank (the “Merger”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2017, by and among the Company, the Bank and County First. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of County First issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time was converted into the right to receive 0.9543 shares of Company common stock and $2.20 in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). The $2.20 in cash represents the sum of (i) $1.00 in cash consideration (the “Cash Consideration”) plus (ii) $1.20 in Contingent Cash Consideration that was determined before the completion of the Merger in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. The aggregate merger consideration consisted of 918,526 shares of the Company’s common stock and $2.1 million in cash. Based upon the $38.78 per share closing price of the Company’s common stock, the transaction value was $37.7 million.

The County First acquisition is being accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting with the Company treated as the acquirer. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of County First, as of January 1, 2018, was be recorded by the Company at their respective fair values, and the excess of the merger consideration over the fair value of County First net assets was allocated to goodwill. At December 31, 2017, County First had total assets of $226.7 million, total net loans of $142.4 million and total deposits of $199.2. County First had five branch offices in La Plata, Waldorf, New Market, Prince Frederick and California, Maryland. The Bank kept the La Plata branch open and consolidated the remaining four branches with legacy Community Bank of the Chesapeake branch offices in May of 2018. See NOTE 2 – BUSINESS COMBINATION AND GOODWILL in this 10-Q for additional information.

¹ As of March 31, 2018, the Company had 16 branches, including the main office in Waldorf. This number included five County First Bank branches. The Company closed four County First branches in May 2018. The La Plata branch was rebranded and remained open.

2017 Operations Summary

Net income for year ended December 31, 2017 was $7.2 million or $1.56 per diluted share after the inclusion of the additional tax expense under the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the expenses associated with the acquisition of County First. The additional income tax and merger and acquisition costs of $724,000, net of tax, resulted in a reduction of earnings per share of approximately $0.75 per share for 2017. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $7.3 million or $1.59 per diluted share.

Pretax income increased $4.6 million or 39.3% to $16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s pretax returns on average assets and common stockholders’ equity for 2017 were 1.19% and 14.88%, respectively, compared to 0.96% and 11.36%, respectively, for 2016. The Company’s after-tax returns on average assets and common stockholders’ equity for 2017 were 0.52% and 6.55%, respectively, compared to 0.60% and 7.09%, respectively, for 2016.

Although the increased tax expense related to the deferred tax revaluation and merger and acquisition costs decreased net income, earnings per share and returns on average assets and common equity for the year, management believes the reduced federal income tax rate and the efficiencies from the County First acquisition will be accretive in 2018. The Company completed a very strong 2017 with operating net income growing at a record pace for the Company. Operating earnings per share increased to $2.31 per share, an increase of $0.72 or 45% from $1.59 per share in 2016. Operating return on average assets and operating return on average common equity increased to 0.78% and 9.70%, respectively, compared to 0.60% and 7.09% in 2016.

We accomplished the increased profitability primarily by controlling expense growth and improving asset quality. The Company’s efficiency ratio averaged in the low 60s for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company’s cost control efforts and continued asset growth continued to create operating leverage in 2017.

Average loans increased $125.5 million or 12.7% from $988.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $1,113.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Overall, end of period loan growth for 2017 of $61.1 million or 5.6% was lower than the Company’s planned 8% to 9% growth. The Company’s two largest portfolios, commercial real estate and residential rentals grew $60.2 million or 9.0% to $727.3 million and $8.3 million or 8.2% to $110.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Other portfolios decreased a net of $7.5 million or 2.3% to $312.5 million. The decrease in other portfolios included a $630,000 decrease in the residential first mortgage portfolio to $170.4 million and a $9.1 million decrease in the construction and land development to $27.9 million. During 2017, management directed its focus to higher yielding commercial real estate and construction loans and deemphasized residential first mortgage lending.

Deposits increased by 6.5%, or $67.4 million, to $1,106.2 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $1,038.8 million at December 31, 2016. During 2017, balance sheet growth was balanced, with deposit growth of $67.4 million slightly exceeding loan growth of $61.1 million. Retail deposits, which include all deposits except traditional brokered deposits, increased a total of $79.4 million, comprised of increases in transaction accounts of $48.6 million and time deposits of $30.8 million. These retail increases to deposits were partially offset by a decrease to brokered deposits of $12.0 million.

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017

Earnings Summary

The Company reported net income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 of $3.9 million or diluted earnings per share of $0.70 compared to net income of $2.8 million or $0.60 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The third quarter results included merger and acquisition costs net of tax of $8,000 and $257,000 for the comparative quarters. Merger and acquisition costs did not change earnings per share for the third quarter of 2018 and resulted in a reduction to quarterly earnings per share of approximately $0.06 for the third quarter of 2017. The Company’s return on average assets (“ROAA”) and return on average common equity (“ROACE”) were 0.96% and 10.29% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 0.80% and 9.99% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in earnings was primarily the result of the reduction in the Company’s expense run rate with the successful integration of the County First transaction, increased net interest income and lower loan loss provisions.

The Company reported operating net income, which excludes merger-related expenses, of $3.9 million, or $0.70 per share, three months ended September 30, 2018. This compares to operating net income of $3.0 million, or $0.66 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Operating net income reflects higher net interest income partially offset by lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expense, much of which is associated with the acquisition of County First. The Company’s operating ROAA and ROACE were 0.96% and 10.31% for the third quarter of 2018 compared to 0.87% and 10.92% for the third quarter of 2017.

Net Interest Income

The primary component of the Company’s net income is its net interest income, which is the difference between income earned on assets and interest paid on the deposits and borrowings used to fund them. Net interest income is affected by the difference between the yields earned on the Company’s interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the relative amounts of such assets and liabilities. Net interest income, divided by average interest-earning assets, represents the Company’s net interest margin.

Net interest income totaled $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, which represents a $1.8 million, or 15.9%, increase from $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Average total earning assets increased $183.9 million, or 14.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 to $1,487.9 million compared to $1,304.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in average total earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from the comparable quarter in 2017, resulted primarily from a $151.6 million, or 13.5%, increase in average loans as a result of organic growth, the acquisition of County First, and a $32.3 million, or 18.3%, increase in average investments. Interest income increased $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the third quarter of 2017. The increase in interest income resulted from larger average balances of interest-earning assets contributing $2.0 million and higher interest yields accounting for $800,000.

Average total interest-bearing liabilities increased $107.9 million, or 9.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 to $1,225.8 million compared to $1,117.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. During the same timeframe, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $59.8 million, or 38.2%, to $216.6 million compared to $156.7 million. Interest expense increased $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the third quarter of 2017. The increase in interest expense resulted from higher interest rates accounting for $1.2 million, partially offset by a decrease of $196,000 in funding costs due to a change in the composition of funding liabilities. For the three-month comparative periods, average short-term borrowings and long-term debt decreased $93.4 million and was replaced with increases to average transaction accounts, which include savings, demand and money market, and non-interest-bearing accounts. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, average transaction accounts increased $259.0 million or 40.4% to $900.7 million from $641.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. During the same timeframe average time deposits increased slightly $2.0 million or 0.5% to $445.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The Company is optimistic that our increased liquidity and funding composition changes will make us less sensitive to rising interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2018.

Net interest margin of 3.43% was five basis points higher than the 3.38% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in net interest margin from the third quarter of 2017 resulted primarily from the Company’s interest earning asset yields increasing at a faster rate than overall funding costs. Interest earning asset yields increased 23 basis points from 4.20% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to 4.43% for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The Company’s cost of funds increased 19 basis points from 0.84% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to 1.03% for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The 2018 third quarter’s interest income was impacted by $161,000 of interest income accretion due to the recognition of the acquired performing fair value mark related to County First, the addition of higher yielding loans from the County First acquisition, and interest recognized on a cash basis of $80,000 for nonaccrual loans. Funding costs were positively impacted as the percentage of funding coming from noninterest-bearing deposits increased from 12.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to 15.0% for the third quarter of 2018.

The following table shows the components of net interest income and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans, including fees	$	15,085	$	12,671	$	2,414			19.1	%
Taxable interest and dividends on investment securities		1,311		988		323			32.7	%
Interest on deposits with banks		88		21		67			319.0	%
Total Interest and Dividend Income		16,484		13,680		2,804			20.5	%

Interest Expenses
Deposits		2,835		1,563		1,272			81.4	%
Short-term borrowings		142		304		(162	)		(53.3	)%
Long-term debt		746		805		(59	)		(7.3	)%
Total Interest Expenses		3,723		2,672		1,051			39.3	%

Net Interest Income (NII)	$	12,761	$	11,008	$	1,753			15.9	%

The following table presents information on average balances and rates for deposits.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018					2017
	Average		Average			Average		Average
(dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
Savings	$	73,114		0.10	%	$	55,125		0.05	%
Interest-bearing demand and money market accounts		611,039		0.72	%		429,847		0.38	%
Certificates of deposit		445,081		1.55	%		443,048		1.03	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,129,234		1.00	%		928,020		0.67	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		216,580					156,746
	$	1,345,814		0.84	%	$	1,084,766		0.58	%

The following table shows the change in funding sources and the cost of funds for the comparable periods:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018								2017
	Average		Average			Percentage			Average		Average			Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Funding			Balance		Rate			Funding
Interest-bearing deposits	$	1,129,234		1.00	%		78.29	%	$	928,020		0.67	%		72.80	%
Debt		96,566		3.68	%		6.69	%		189,927		2.34	%		14.90	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,225,800		1.21	%		84.98	%		1,117,947		0.96	%		87.70	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		216,580					15.02	%		156,746					12.30	%
Total funds	$	1,442,380		1.03	%		100.00	%	$	1,274,693		0.84	%		100.00	%

The following table presents information on the average balances of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest earned or paid thereon for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018								2017
	Average					Avg. Yield			Average					Avg. Yield
dollars in thousands	Balance			Interest		/Cost			Balance			Interest		/Cost
Assets
Commercial real estate	$	833,970		$	9,740		4.67	%	$	710,113		$	7,916		4.46	%
Residential first mortgages		159,454			1,452		3.64	%		178,631			1,657		3.71	%
Residential rentals		125,946			1,580		5.02	%		110,323			1,276		4.63	%
Construction and land development		28,452			406		5.71	%		31,584			415		5.26	%
Home equity and second mortgages		36,968			491		5.31	%		21,747			246		4.52	%
Commercial and equipment loans		104,512			1,400		5.36	%		85,314			1,152		5.40	%
Consumer loans		770			16		8.31	%		480			9		7.50	%
Allowance for loan losses		(10,830	)		-		0.00	%		(10,566	)		-		0.00	%
Loan portfolio (1)		1,279,242			15,085		4.72	%		1,127,626			12,671		4.49	%
Investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits		208,627			1,399		2.68	%		176,360			1,009		2.29	%
Interest-Earning Assets ("IEAs")		1,487,869			16,484		4.43	%		1,303,986			13,680		4.20	%
Cash and cash equivalents		23,765								18,199
Goodwill		10,604								-
Core deposit intangible		3,120								-
Other assets		81,495								74,274
Total Assets	$	1,606,853							$	1,396,459
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Savings	$	73,114		$	19		0.10	%	$	55,125		$	7		0.05	%
Interest-bearing demand and money market accounts		611,039			1,093		0.72	%		429,847			412		0.38	%
Certificates of deposit		445,081			1,723		1.55	%		443,048			1,144		1.03	%
Long-term debt		34,696			242		2.79	%		58,019			352		2.43	%
Short-term borrowings		26,870			142		2.11	%		96,908			304		1.25	%
Subordinated Notes		23,000			360		6.26	%		23,000			359		6.24	%
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures		12,000			144		4.80	%		12,000			94		3.13	%

Interest-Bearing Liabilities ("IBLs")		1,225,800			3,723		1.21	%		1,117,947			2,672		0.96	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		216,580								156,746
Other liabilities		14,460								10,409
Stockholders' equity		150,013								111,357
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	1,606,853							$	1,396,459
Net interest income				$	12,761							$	11,008
Interest rate spread							3.22	%							3.24	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets							3.43	%							3.38	%
Avg. loans to avg. deposits							95.05	%							103.95	%
Avg. transaction deposits to total avg. deposits **							66.93	%							59.16	%
Ratio of average IEAs to average IBLs							121.38	%							116.64	%
Cost of funds							1.03	%							0.84	%
Cost of deposits							0.84	%							0.58	%
Cost of debt							3.68	%							2.34	%

(1) Average balance includes non-accrual loans. There are no tax equivalency adjustments. There was $161,000 of accretion interest during the three months ended September 30, 2018.

** Transaction deposits excluded time deposits.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Bank for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by old rate); and (2) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume). Changes in rate-volume (changes in rate multiplied by the change in volume) have been allocated to changes due to volume.

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

compared to the Three Months Ended

September 30, 2017

				Due to
dollars in thousands	Volume			Rate			Total

Interest income:
Loan portfolio (1)	$	1,788		$	626		$	2,414
Investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits		216			174			390
Total interest-earning assets	$	2,004		$	800		$	2,804

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings		5			7			12
Interest-bearing demand and money market accounts		324			357			681
Certificates of deposit		8			571			579
Long-term debt		(163	)		53			(110	)
Short-term borrowings		(370	)		208			(162	)
Subordinated notes		-			1			1
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures		-			50			50
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(196	)	$	1,247		$	1,051
Net change in net interest income	$	2,200		$	(447	)	$	1,753

(1) Average balance includes non-accrual loans. There are no tax equivalency adjustments. There was $161,000 of accretion interest during the three months ended September 30, 2018.

Provision for Loan Losses

The following table shows the dollar and percentage changes for the provision for loan losses for the periods presented.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands )	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Provision for loan losses	$	40	$	224	$	(184	)		(82.1	)%

The provision for loan losses decreased $184,000 to $40,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $224,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Net charge-offs of $26,000 were recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to net charge-offs of $223,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. See further discussion of the provision under the caption “Asset Quality” in the Comparison of Financial Condition section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income of $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $87,000 compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to gains on loans held for sale of $294,000 sold in the third quarter of 2017. The decrease to non-interest income was partially offset by increases in service charge and miscellaneous income of $184,000 due to the larger customer base resulting from the acquisition of County First. In addition, Bank Owned Life Insurance acquired in the County First transaction of approximately $6.3 million increased non-interest income by $31,000 compared to the prior comparable period.

The following table shows the components of noninterest income and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands )	2018			2017		$ Change			% Change
Noninterest Income
Loan appraisal, credit, and miscellaneous charges	$	81		$	28	$	53			189.3	%
Unrealized losses on equity securities		(8	)		-		(8	)		n/a
Income from bank owned life insurance		227			196		31			15.8	%
Service charges		770			639		131			20.5	%
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		-			294		(294	)		(100.0	)%
Total Noninterest Income	$	1,070		$	1,157	$	(87	)		(7.5	)%

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expenses increased $1.1 million, or 14.1%, to $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and decreased $1.3 million, or 12.9%, compared to $9.7 million in the second quarter of 2018. Adjusted noninterest expense, which excludes merger-related expenses and OREO related expenses, increased $1.4 million, or 20.2%, to $8.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and decreased $455,000, or 5.2%, compared to $8.8 million in the second quarter of 2018. Overall the increases in adjusted noninterest expenses comparing the third quarter of 2018 to the same quarter in 2017 were due primarily to increases in salary and employee benefits due to the addition of County First employees. Other increases from the comparable periods were due to occupancy expense, data processing expense, core deposit intangible amortization and advertising expense, all of which were due primarily to the acquisition of County First. The Company closed four of the five acquired branches in May 2018. All three of the held for sale County First branches were sold in the first nine months of 2018. The Company’s third quarter 2018 expense run rate was $8.5 million and was positively impacted by the second quarter branch closures and reduced employee headcount. The Company’s expected expense run rate for the third and fourth quarters was projected to be between $8.4 million and $8.6 million.

The Company’s efficiency ratio² was 61.40% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 61.18% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The Company’s net operating expense ratio³ was 1.85% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 1.80% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The Company’s net operating expenses increased $1.1 million from $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Net operating expense ratios have increased in the first nine months of 2018 primarily due to merger and acquisition costs and duplicate systems and resources required to integrate County First. These costs began to decrease during the third quarter of 2018. The Company incurred $11,000 in merger and acquisition costs related to the acquisition during the three months ended September 30, 2018, and does not expect significant merger related costs in the fourth quarter of 2018.

The following tables show the components of noninterest expense and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Salary and employee benefits	$	4,739	$	4,056	$	683			16.8	%
OREO valuation allowance and expenses		165		283		(118	)		(41.7	)%
Merger and acquisition costs		11		239		(228	)		(95.4	)%
Operating expenses		3,577		2,864		713			24.9	%
Total Noninterest Expense	$	8,492	$	7,442	$	1,050			14.1	%

	Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands )	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Noninterest Expense
Salary and employee benefits	$	4,739	$	4,056	$	683			16.8	%
Occupancy expense		744		630		114			18.1	%
Advertising		165		156		9			5.8	%
Data processing expense		769		555		214			38.6	%
Professional fees		442		510		(68	)		(13.3	)%
Merger & acquisition costs		11		239		(228	)		(95.4	)%
Depreciation of premises and equipment		207		191		16			8.4	%
Telephone communications		62		46		16			34.8	%
Office supplies		31		26		5			19.2	%
FDIC Insurance		185		178		7			3.9	%
OREO valuation allowance and expenses		165		283		(118	)		(41.7	)%
Core deposit intangible amortization		193		-		193			n/a
Other		779		572		207			36.2	%
Total Noninterest Expense	$	8,492	$	7,442	$	1,050			14.1	%

Income Tax Expense

The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate was 27.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, due to lower tax rates enacted with the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 partially offset by certain non-deductible holding company expenses that are not deductible for state tax purposes. The Company’s normal effective rate as of September 30, 2018 was 27.52% (19.27% for federal; 8.25% for state). The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate was 38.2% in the third quarter of 2017.

² Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income.

³ The net operating expense ratio is defined as noninterest expense less noninterest income divided by average assets.

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017

Earnings Summary

The Company reported net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 of $7.4 million or diluted earnings per share of $1.34 compared to net income of $7.7 million or $1.65 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The results included merger and acquisition costs net of tax of $2.7 million and $494,000 for the comparative nine month periods. The impact of merger and acquisition costs resulted in a reduction to earnings per share of approximately $0.48 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $0.11 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company’s ROAA and ROACE were 0.62% and 6.68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 0.75% and 9.38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company completed the acquisition of County First on January 1, 2018, increasing the Company’s asset size by $200 million to just under $1.6 billion. As planned, the Company closed four of the five acquired County First branches during May of 2018. The La Plata downtown branch was rebranded and remains open. The first nine months of 2018 results reflect temporary increases in operating expenses to support the merger with County First Bank. The closure of four branches and reductions in headcount during the second quarter positively impacted the Company’s operating expense run rate in the third quarter of 2018. The current year decrease in net income compared to the prior year was primarily due to merger-related costs, which included termination costs of County First’s core processing contract as well as investment banking, legal fees and the costs of employee agreements and severance for terminations. In addition, the Company will continue to carry additional noninterest expense in the second half of 2018 until duplicate vendors and processes are discontinued. The increase in noninterest expense was partially offset by an increase in net interest income realized from the integrated operations of County First associated with the acquisition and from a lower effective tax rate.

The Company reported operating net income, which excludes merger-related expenses, of $10.1 million, or $1.82 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This compares to operating net income of $8.2 million, or $1.76 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Operating net income reflects higher net interest income partially offset by higher noninterest expense, much of which is associated with the acquisition of County First. The Company’s operating ROAA and ROACE were 0.85% and 9.10% for the first nine months of 2018 compared to 0.79% and 9.99% for the first nine months of 2017.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income totaled $38.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, which represents a $5.5 million, or 16.7%, increase from $32.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Average total earning assets increased $185.2 million, or 14.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $1,467.6 million compared to $1,282.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in average total earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from the comparable period in 2017, resulted primarily from a $165.5 million, or 15.0%, increase in average loans as a result of organic growth and the acquisition of County First and a $19.6 million, or 11.2%, increase in average investments. Interest income increased $8.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period of 2017. The increase in interest income resulted from larger average balances of interest-earning assets contributing $6.1 million and higher interest yields accounting for $2.0 million.

Average total interest-bearing liabilities increased $111.4 million, or 10.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $1,210.6 million compared to $1,099.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. During the same timeframe, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $67.0 million, or 44.4%, to $217.7 million compared to $150.7 million. Interest expense increased $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period of 2017. The increase in interest expense resulted from higher interest rates accounting for $2.8 million. Funding costs from a change in the composition of funding liabilities resulted in a small decrease of $117,000 to interest expense. For the nine month comparative periods, average short-term borrowings and long-term debt decreased $59.9 million and was replaced with increases to average transaction accounts, which include savings, demand and money market, and noninterest-bearing accounts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, average transaction accounts increased $223.0 million or 35.8% to $845.3 million from $622.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. During the same timeframe average time deposits increased slightly, $15.2 million or 3.4%, to $457.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Net interest margin of 3.46% was seven basis points higher than the 3.39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in net interest margin from the first nine months of 2017 resulted primarily from the Company’s interest earning asset yields increasing at faster rate than overall funding costs. Interest earning asset yields increased 21 basis points from 4.16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to 4.37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company’s cost of funds increased 15 basis points from 0.79% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to 0.94% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The 2018 year to date interest income was impacted from $635,000 of interest income accretion due to the recognition of the acquired performing fair value mark related to County First as well as the addition of higher yielding loans from the County First acquisition. Funding costs were positively impacted as the percentage of funding coming from noninterest-bearing deposits increased from 12.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to 15.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

During the first nine months of 2018, net interest margin increased as higher yielding assets more than offset the increased cost of funds. The increase in transaction accounts with the acquisition of County First as well as organic transaction deposit growth in the first nine months of 2018 helped minimize deposit betas and positively impacted net interest margin. The pay down of wholesale funding also positively impacted margins. The increase in transaction accounts with the acquisition of County First, as well as organic transaction deposit growth in the first nine months of 2018 helped control the increase in deposit costs. Brokered deposits and FHLB advances were paid down $178.4 million in the first nine months of 2018 and replaced with retail deposits. Retail deposits, which include all deposits except brokered deposits, increased $407.0 million or 41.2% from $987.2 million at December 31, 2017 to $1,394.2 million at September 30, 2018. Management is optimistic that increased liquidity and improved funding composition will partially mitigate the Company’s sensitivity to rising interest rates during the remainder of 2018.

Wholesale and time-based funding rates are typically more sensitive to rising interest rates than transactional deposits. Compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, average interest rates on certificates of deposits in 2018 increased by 52 basis points in the third quarter of 2018 and 43 basis points in the first nine months of 2018 to 1.55% and 1.38%, respectively. During the comparable periods, interest-bearing transactional deposits increased by 30 basis points and 22 basis points to 0.65% and 0.53%, respectively. The increases in transaction deposits during the last twelve months have decreased downward pressure on net interest margin. The ability to increase transaction deposits faster than wholesale funding could mitigate possible downward pressure on net interest margin in a rising rate environment.

The following table shows the components of net interest income and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans, including fees	$	44,294	$	37,051	$	7,243			19.5	%
Taxable interest and dividends on investment securities		3,617		2,907		710			24.4	%
Interest on deposits with banks		220		39		181			464.1	%
Total Interest and Dividend Income		48,131		39,997		8,134			20.3	%

Interest Expenses
Deposits		7,196		4,234		2,962			70.0	%
Short-term borrowings		642		734		(92	)		(12.5	)%
Long-term debt		2,231		2,414		(183	)		(7.6	)%
Total Interest Expenses		10,069		7,382		2,687			36.4	%

Net Interest Income (NII)	$	38,062	$	32,615	$	5,447			16.7	%

The following table presents information on average balances and rates for deposits.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018					2017
	Average		Average			Average		Average
(dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
Savings	$	74,169		0.08	%	$	53,369		0.05	%
Interest-bearing demand and money market accounts		553,386		0.59	%		418,148		0.34	%
Certificates of deposit		457,621		1.38	%		442,410		0.95	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,085,176		0.88	%		913,927		0.62	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		217,738					150,757
	$	1,302,914		0.74	%	$	1,064,684		0.53	%

The following table shows the change in funding sources and the cost of funds for the comparable periods:

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018								2017
	Average		Average			Percentage			Average		Average			Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Funding			Balance		Rate			Funding
Interest-bearing deposits	$	1,085,176		0.88	%		75.98	%	$	913,927		0.62	%		73.12	%
Debt		125,380		3.06	%		8.78	%		185,243		2.27	%		14.82	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,210,556		1.11	%		84.76	%		1,099,170		0.90	%		87.94	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		217,738					15.24	%		150,757					12.06	%
Total funds	$	1,428,294		0.94	%		100.00	%	$	1,249,927		0.79	%		100.00	%

The following table presents information on the average balances of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest earned or paid thereon for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2018								2017
	Average					Avg. Yield			Average					Avg. Yield
dollars in thousands	Balance			Interest		/Cost			Balance			Interest		/Cost
Assets
Commercial real estate	$	823,417		$	28,422		4.60	%	$	692,285		$	22,967		4.42	%
Residential first mortgages		164,332			4,513		3.66	%		177,527			5,052		3.79	%
Residential rentals		127,553			4,687		4.90	%		104,363			3,612		4.61	%
Construction and land development		28,470			1,171		5.48	%		35,327			1,284		4.85	%
Home equity and second mortgages		38,531			1,500		5.19	%		21,384			695		4.33	%
Commercial and equipment loans		100,761			3,960		5.24	%		86,589			3,414		5.26	%
Consumer loans		818			41		6.68	%		449			27		8.02	%
Allowance for loan losses		(10,718	)		-		0.00	%		(10,306	)		-		0.00	%
Loan portfolio (1)		1,273,164			44,294		4.64	%		1,107,618			37,051		4.46	%
Investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits		194,440			3,837		2.63	%		174,813			2,946		2.25	%
Interest-Earning Assets ("IEAs")		1,467,604			48,131		4.37	%		1,282,431			39,997		4.16	%
Cash and cash equivalents		24,978								14,555
Goodwill		10,345								-
Core deposit intangible		3,304								-
Other assets		83,207								72,597
Total Assets	$	1,589,438							$	1,369,583
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Savings	$	74,169		$	44		0.08	%	$	53,369		$	20		0.05	%
Interest-bearing demand and money
market accounts		553,386			2,432		0.59	%		418,148			1,073		0.34	%
Certificates of deposit		457,621			4,720		1.38	%		442,410			3,141		0.95	%
Long-term debt		40,820			754		2.46	%		59,783			1,028		2.29	%
Short-term borrowings		49,560			642		1.73	%		90,460			734		1.08	%
Subordinated Notes		23,000			1,078		6.25	%		23,000			1,078		6.25	%
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures		12,000			399		4.43	%		12,000			308		3.42	%

Interest-Bearing Liabilities ("IBLs")		1,210,556			10,069		1.11	%		1,099,170			7,382		0.90	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		217,738								150,757
Other liabilities		13,122								10,700
Stockholders' equity		148,022								108,956
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	1,589,438							$	1,369,583
Net interest income				$	38,062							$	32,615
Interest rate spread							3.26	%							3.26	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets							3.46	%							3.39	%
Avg. loans to avg. deposits							97.72	%							104.03	%
Avg. transaction deposits to total avg. deposits **							64.88	%							58.45	%
Ratio of average IEAs to average IBLs							121.23	%							116.67	%
Cost of funds							0.94	%							0.79	%
Cost of deposits							0.74	%							0.53	%
Cost of debt							3.06	%							2.27	%

(1) Average balance includes non-accrual loans. There are no tax equivalency adjustments. There was $635,000 of accretion interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

** Transaction deposits excluded time deposits.

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

compared to the Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2017

				Due to
dollars in thousands	Volume			Rate			Total

Interest income:
Loan portfolio (1)	$	5,759		$	1,484		$	7,243
Investment securities, federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits		387			504			891
Total interest-earning assets	$	6,146		$	1,988		$	8,134

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings		12			12			24
Interest-bearing demand and money market accounts		594			765			1,359
Certificates of deposit		157			1,422			1,579
Long-term debt		(350	)		76			(274	)
Short-term borrowings		(530	)		438			(92	)
Subordinated notes		-			-			-
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures		-			91			91
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(117	)	$	2,804		$	2,687
Net change in net interest income	$	6,263		$	(816	)	$	5,447

(1) Average balance includes non-accrual loans. There are no tax equivalency adjustments. There was $635,000 of accretion interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Provision for Loan Losses

The following table shows the dollar and percentage changes for the provision for loan losses for the periods presented.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Provision for loan losses	$	940	$	980	$	(40	)		(4.1	)%

The provision for loan losses decreased $40,000 to $940,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $980,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Net charge-offs of $716,000 were recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to net charge-offs of $405,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. See further discussion of the provision under the caption “Asset Quality” in the Comparison of Financial Condition section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income was essentially flat at $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The small decrease of $46,000 for the comparable periods was primarily due to gains on loans held for sale of $294,000 sold in the third quarter of 2017, gains on the sale of investment securities sold in the third quarter of 2017 of $133,000 and the recognition of unrealized losses on equity securities during 2018 of $86,000 due to a new accounting standard effective in the first quarter of 2018 that requires recognition of changes in the fair value flow through the Company’s statement of income. These decreases to non-interest income were partially offset by increases in service charge and miscellaneous income of $417,000 due to a larger customer base with the acquisition of County First and a $96,000 increase in income from the addition of approximately $6.3 million of Bank Owned Life Insurance acquired in the County First transaction

The following table shows the components of noninterest income and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017		$ Change			% Change
Noninterest Income
Loan appraisal, credit, and miscellaneous charges	$	141		$	84	$	57			67.9	%
Gain on sale of assets		1			47		(46	)		(97.9	)%
Net gains on sale of investment securities		-			133		(133	)		(100.0	)%
Unrealized losses on equity securities		(86	)		-		(86	)		n/a
Income from bank owned life insurance		677			581		96			16.5	%
Service charges		2,269			1,909		360			18.9	%
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		-			294		(294	)		(100.0	)%
Total Noninterest Income	$	3,002		$	3,048	$	(46	)		(1.5	)%

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expenses increased $7.6 million, or 34.0%, to $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $22.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Adjusted noninterest expense, which excludes merger-related expenses and OREO related expenses increased $4.6 million, or 21.4%, to $25.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $21.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Overall the increases in adjusted noninterest expenses were due primarily to increases in salary and employee benefits due to the addition of County First employees. Other increases from the comparable periods were to occupancy expense, data processing expense, core deposit intangible amortization and advertising expense, all of which were due primarily to the acquisition of County First. The Company closed four of the five acquired branches in May 2018. The three held for sale County First branches were sold in the first nine months of 2018. Branch closings positively impacted the Company’s expense run rate in the third quarter and are expected to for the balance of 2018.

The Company’s efficiency ratio was 72.83% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 62.57% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company’s net operating expense ratio was 2.26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 1.88% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company’s net operating expenses increased $7.6 million from $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $26.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The $7.6 million variance included a merger and acquisition cost variance of $3.1 million. Net operating expense ratios increased in the first nine months of 2018 primarily due to duplicate systems and resources required to integrate County First. These costs decreased in the third quarter of 2018 and the Company does not expect significant integration costs or merger and acquisition costs related to the acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Company’s expected expense run rate for the fourth quarter of 2018 is $8.4 million to $8.6 million per quarter.

The following tables show the components of noninterest expense and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Salary and employee benefits	$	14,915	$	12,567	$	2,348			18.7	%
OREO valuation allowance and expenses		516		587		(71	)		(12.1	)%
Merger and acquisition costs		3,620		494		3,126			632.8	%
Operating expenses		10,857		8,667		2,190			25.3	%
Total Noninterest Expense	$	29,908	$	22,315	$	7,593			34.0	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		$ Change			% Change
Noninterest Expense
Salary and employee benefits	$	14,915	$	12,567	$	2,348			18.7	%
Occupancy expense		2,249		1,941		308			15.9	%
Advertising		504		404		100			24.8	%
Data processing expense		2,234		1,766		468			26.5	%
Professional fees		1,220		1,190		30			2.5	%
Merger and acquisition costs		3,620		494		3,126			632.8	%
Depreciation of premises and equipment		608		594		14			2.4	%
Telephone communications		230		142		88			62.0	%
Office supplies		112		86		26			30.2	%
FDIC Insurance		496		505		(9	)		(1.8	)%
OREO valuation allowance and expenses		516		587		(71	)		(12.1	)%
Core deposit intangible amortization		597		-		597			n/a
Other		2,607		2,039		568			27.9	%
Total Noninterest Expense	$	29,908	$	22,315	$	7,593			34.0	%

Income Tax Expense

The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate was 27.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, due to lower tax rates enacted with the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 partially offset by certain non-deductible merger-related expenses and holding company expenses that are not deductible for state tax purposes. The Company’s normal effective rate as of September 30, 2018 was 27.52% (19.27% for federal; 8.25% for state). The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate was 38.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017

Assets

Total assets increased $270.4 million, or 19.2%, to $1.7 billion at September 30, 2018 compared to total assets of $1.4 billion at December 31, 2017, primarily as a result of the acquisition of County First as well as organic retail deposit growth in the second and third quarters of 2018. Cash and cash equivalents increased $56.2 million, or 364.4%, to $71.6 million and total securities increased $42.3 million, or 25.2%, to $209.8 million. Gross loans increased 13.7% or $157.7 million from $1,150.0 million at December 31, 2017 to $1,307.7 million at September 30, 2018, primarily due to the acquisition. The differences in allocations between the cash and investment categories reflect operational needs.

The following table shows the Company’s assets and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		$ Change			% Change

Cash and due from banks	$	26,718	$	13,315	$	13,403			100.7	%
Federal funds sold		36,099		-		36,099			n/a
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		8,778		2,102		6,676			317.6	%
Securities available for sale (AFS), at fair value		107,962		68,164		39,798			58.4	%
Securities held to maturity (HTM), at amortized cost		97,217		99,246		(2,029	)		(2.0	)%
Equity securities carried at fair value through income		4,359		-		4,359			n/a
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions		249		121		128			105.8	%
FHLB stock - at cost		2,547		7,276		(4,729	)		(65.0	)%
Net Loans		1,297,915		1,140,615		157,300			13.8	%
Goodwill		10,708		-		10,708			n/a
Premises and equipment, net		22,433		21,391		1,042			4.9	%
Other real estate owned (OREO)		8,207		9,341		(1,134	)		(12.1	)%
Accrued interest receivable		5,032		4,511		521			11.5	%
Investment in bank owned life insurance		36,071		29,398		6,673			22.7	%
Core deposit intangible		2,993		-		2,993			n/a
Net deferred tax assets		6,999		5,922		1,077			18.2	%
Other assets		2,122		4,559		(2,437	)		(53.5	)%
Total Assets	$	1,676,409	$	1,405,961	$	270,448			19.2	%

The acquisition of County First led to a shift in the composition of the loan portfolios during 2018 compared to December 31, 2017. The overall increase in the commercial real estate portfolio from 63.25% of gross loans at December 31, 2017to 64.84% at September 30, 2018 should increase asset sensitivity over time. The relative decrease in residential first mortgage balances from 14.81% of gross loans at December 31, 2018 to 11.97% at September 30, 2018, should also increase asset interest rate sensitivity in a rising rate environment. Regulatory concentrations for non-owner occupied commercial real estate and construction decreased from 309.6% and 65.5% at December 31, 2017 to 303.7% and 64.9% at September 30, 2018. The Company is encouraged by a strong loan pipeline of approximately $140 million at September 30, 2018. During the third quarter of 2018, gross loans increased $17.3 million from the previous quarter or at a 5.4% annualized rate. The following is a breakdown of the Company’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

	September 30, 2018											December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	PCI		All other loans**			Total			% of Gross Loans			Total			% of Gross Loans

Commercial real estate	$	1,463	$	846,482		$	847,945			64.84	%	$	727,314			63.25	%
Residential first mortgages		468		156,097			156,565			11.97	%		170,374			14.81	%
Residential rentals		1,261		124,122			125,383			9.59	%		110,228			9.58	%
Construction and land development		-		28,788			28,788			2.20	%		27,871			2.42	%
Home equity and second mortgages		319		36,041			36,360			2.78	%		21,351			1.86	%
Commercial loans		-		62,083			62,083			4.75	%		56,417			4.91	%
Consumer loans		-		730			730			0.06	%		573			0.05	%
Commercial equipment		-		49,883			49,883			3.81	%		35,916			3.12	%
Gross loans		3,511		1,304,226			1,307,737			100.00	%		1,150,044			100.00	%
Net deferred costs (fees)		-		917			917			0.07	%		1,086			0.09	%
Total loans, net of deferred costs	$	3,511	$	1,305,143		$	1,308,654					$	1,151,130
Less: allowance for loan losses		-		(10,739	)		(10,739	)		-0.82	%		(10,515	)		-0.91	%
Net loans	$	3,511	$	1,294,404		$	1,297,915					$	1,140,615

**All other loans include acquired Non-PCI pools at fair value.

The following is a breakdown of acquired and non-acquired loans as of September 30, 2018:

BY ACQUIRED AND NON-ACQUIRED	September 30, 2018		%			December 31, 2017		%
Acquired loans - performing	$	107,142		8.19	%	$	-		0.00	%
Acquired loans - purchase credit impaired ("PCI")		3,511		0.27	%		-		0.00	%
Total acquired loans		110,653		8.46	%		-		0.00	%
Non-acquired loans**		1,197,084		91.54	%		1,150,044		100.00	%
Gross loans		1,307,737					1,150,044
Net deferred costs (fees)		917		0.07	%		1,086		0.09	%
Total loans, net of deferred costs	$	1,308,654				$	1,151,130

** Non-acquired loans include loans transferred from acquired pools following release of acquisition accounting FMV adjustments.

The non-acquired portfolios increased $47.1 million or 5.5% annualized rate from $1,150.0 million at December 31, 2017 to $1.197.1 million at September 30, 2018. The Bank’s higher yielding commercial portfolios, which include commercial real estate, commercial loans and commercial equipment increased $65.0 million at a 10.6% annualized rate during the first nine months of 2018, which has been partially offset by a net decrease in other loan portfolios of $17.9 million.

The following is a breakdown of the Company’s non-acquired loan portfolios at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

Non-Acquired Loan Portfolios
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018		%			December 31, 2017		%			$ Change			Annualized % Change
Commercial real estate	$	780,236		65.17	%	$	727,314		63.25	%	$	52,922			9.70	%
Residential first mortgages		156,097		13.04	%		170,374		14.81	%		(14,277	)		-11.17	%
Residential rentals		105,662		8.83	%		110,228		9.58	%		(4,566	)		-5.52	%
Construction and land development		28,260		2.36	%		27,871		2.42	%		389			1.86	%
Home equity and second mortgages		21,870		1.83	%		21,351		1.86	%		519			3.24	%
Commercial loans		59,200		4.95	%		56,417		4.91	%		2,783			6.58	%
Consumer loans		514		0.04	%		573		0.05	%		(59	)		-13.73	%
Commercial equipment		45,245		3.78	%		35,916		3.12	%		9,329			34.63	%
	$	1,197,084		100.00	%	$	1,150,044		100.00	%	$	47,040			5.45	%

Asset Quality

The following tables show asset quality ratios at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			$ Change			% Change
ASSET QUALITY
Total assets	$	1,676,409		$	1,405,961		$	270,448			19.2	%
Gross loans		1,307,737			1,150,044			157,693			13.7
Classified Assets		37,369			50,298			(12,929	)		(25.7	)
Allowance for loan losses		10,739			10,515			224			2.1

Past due loans - 31 to 89 days		6,499			9,227			(2,728	)		(29.6	)
Past due loans >=90 days		9,666			2,483			7,183			289.3
Total past due (delinquency) loans		16,165			11,710			4,455			38.0

Non-accrual loans (a)		16,350			4,693			11,657			248.4
Accruing troubled debt restructures (TDRs) (b)		9,839			10,021			(182	)		(1.8	)
Other real estate owned (OREO)		8,207			9,341			(1,134	)		(12.1	)
Non-accrual loans, OREO and TDRs	$	34,396		$	24,055		$	10,341			43.0
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS
Classified assets to total assets		2.23	%		3.58	%
Classified assets to risk-based capital		20.12			32.10
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.82			0.91
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans		65.68			224.06
Past due loans - 31 to 89 days to total loans		0.50			0.80
Past due loans >=90 days to total loans		0.74			0.22
Total past due (delinquency) to total loans		1.24			1.02
Non-accrual loans to total loans		1.25			0.41
Non-accrual loans and TDRs to total loans		2.00			1.28
Non-accrual loans and OREO to total assets		1.46			1.00
Non-accrual loans, OREO and TDRs to total assets		2.05			1.71

^(a)Non-accrual loans include all loans that are 90 days or more delinquent and loans that are non-accrual due to the operating results or cash flows of a customer. Non-accrual loans can include loans that are current with all loan payments.

^(b) At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Bank had total TDRs of $9.8 million and $10.8 million, respectively, with $0 and $769,000, respectively, in non-accrual status. These loans are classified as non-accrual loans for the calculation of financial ratios.

The Company continues to pursue its approach of maximizing contractual rights with individual classified customer relationships. The objective is to expeditiously resolve non-performing or substandard credits that are not likely to become performing or passing credits in a reasonable timeframe. Management believes this strategy is in the best long-term interest of the Company.

Classified assets decreased $12.9 million from $50.3 million at December 31, 2017 to $37.4 million at September 30, 2018. Management considers classified assets to be an important measure of asset quality. The following is a breakdown of the Company’s classified and special mention assets at September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively:

Classified Assets and Special Mention Assets
(dollars in thousands)	As of 09/30/2018			As of 06/30/2018			As of 03/31/2018			As of 12/31/2017			As of 12/31/2016			As of 12/31/2015			As of 12/31/2014
Classified loans
Substandard	$	28,640		$	34,559		$	34,772		$	40,306		$	30,463		$	31,943		$	46,735
Doubtful		-			103			-			-			137			861			-
Loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Total classified loans		28,640			34,662			34,772			40,306			30,600			32,804			46,735
Special mention loans		-			854			2,033			96			-			1,642			5,460
Total classified and special mention loans	$	28,640		$	35,516		$	36,805		$	40,402		$	30,600		$	34,446		$	52,195

Classified loans		28,640			34,662			34,772			40,306			30,600			32,804			46,735
Classified securities		522			569			612			651			883			1,093			1,404
Other real estate owned		8,207			8,305			9,352			9,341			7,763			9,449			5,883
Total classified assets	$	37,369		$	43,536		$	44,736		$	50,298		$	39,246		$	43,346		$	54,022

Total classified assets as a percentage of total assets		2.23	%		2.74	%		2.84	%		3.58	%		2.94	%		3.79	%		4.99	%
Total classified assets as a percentage of Risk Based Capital		20.12	%		23.88	%		24.81	%		32.10	%		26.13	%		30.19	%		39.30	%

Non-accrual loans and OREO to total assets increased from 1.00% at December 31, 2017 to 1.46% at September 30, 2018. Non-accrual loans, OREO and TDRs to total assets increased from 1.71% at December 31, 2017 to 2.05% at September 30, 2018. The increase in non-accruals during 2018, was primarily the result of one well-secured classified relationship of $10.3 million that was placed on non-accrual during the second quarter of 2018.

TDRs decreased $951,000 due to principal paydowns and payoffs for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. There were no TDRs added during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company had specific reserves of $174,000 on one TDRs totaling $1.6 million at September 30, 2018. The Company had specific reserves of $413,000 on seven TDRs totaling $3.0 million at December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, TDR disposals, which included payoffs and refinancing, decreased by seven loans totaling $3.9 million, of which $3.0 million related to the foreclosure of the stalled residential development project. TDR loan principal curtailment was $385,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no TDRs added during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The following is a breakdown by loan classification of the Company’s TDRs at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Dollars		Number of Loans		Dollars			Number of Loans

Commercial real estate	$	8,345		8	$	9,273			9
Residential first mortgages		512		2		527			2
Residential rentals		218		1		221			1
Construction and land development		729		2		729			2
Commercial loans		3		1		4			1
Commercial equipment		32		1		36			1
Total TDRs	$	9,839		15	$	10,790			16
Less: TDRs included in non-accrual loans		-		-		(769	)		(1	)
Total accrual TDR loans	$	9,839		15	$	10,021			15

The Company recorded a $40,000 and $940,000 provision for loan loss expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to loan loss provisions of $224,000 and $980,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Net charge-offs of $26,000 and $716,000 were recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. Net charge-offs of $223,000 and $405,000 for the same periods in 2017. Allowance for loan loss levels decreased to 0.82% of total loans at September 30, 2018 compared to 0.91% at December 31, 2017 due to the addition of County First loans for which no allowance was provided for in accordance with purchase accounting standards. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on a periodic evaluation of the portfolio with consideration given to: overall loss experience; current economic conditions; size, growth and composition of the loan portfolio; financial condition of the borrowers; current appraised values of underlying collateral and other relevant factors that, in management’s judgment, warrant recognition in determining an adequate allowance. Improvements to baseline charge-off factors for the periods used to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance as well as improvements in some qualitative factors, such as slower portfolio growth and improvement in classified assets, were offset by increases in other qualitative factors, such as increased commercial real estate concentrations. The specific allowance is based on management’s estimate of realizable value for particular loans. Management believes that the allowance is adequate.

The following is a summary roll-forward of the allowance and a breakdown of the Company’s general and specific allowances as a percentage of gross loans at and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 and year ended December 31, 2017:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Year Ended
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017			September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017			December 31, 2017
Beginning of period	$	10,725		$	10,434		$	10,515		$	9,860		$	9,860

Charge-offs		(219	)		(253	)		(963	)		(469	)		(482	)
Recoveries		193			30			247			64			127
Net charge-offs		(26	)		(223	)		(716	)		(405	)		(355	)

Provision for loan losses		40			224			940			980			1,010
End of period	$	10,739		$	10,435		$	10,739		$	10,435		$	10,515

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		-0.01	%		-0.08	%		-0.07	%		-0.05	%		-0.03	%

Breakdown of general and specific allowance as a percentage of gross loans							September 30, 2018			September 30, 2017			December 31, 2017
General allowance							$	9,729		$	9,617		$	9,491
Specific allowance								1,010			818			1,024
							$	10,739		$	10,435		$	10,515
General allowance								0.74	%		0.84	%		0.82	%
Specific allowance								0.08	%		0.07	%		0.09	%
Allowance to gross loans								0.82	%		0.91	%		0.91	%

Allowance to non-acquired gross loans								0.90	%		0.91	%		0.91	%

Total acquired loans								110,653			-			-
Non-acquired loans**								1,197,084			1,145,406			1,150,044
Gross loans								1,307,737			1,145,406			1,150,044

** Non-acquired loans include loans transferred from acquired pools following release of acquisition accounting FMV adjustments.

The OREO balance decreased $1.1 from $9.3 million at December 31, 2017 to $8.2 million at September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, OREO additions were $282,000 and $3.6 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, additions of $282,000 were for $139,000 of capitalized costs to improve a development project and $143,000 for commercial real estate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, additions of $3.6 million consisted of $3.0 million related to the foreclosure of a stalled residential development project. Further, additions included $103,000 for residential lots and $495,000 for a commercial office building. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were OREO disposals of $991,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. The Company recognized net losses of $8,000 on disposals of multiple residential lots of $188,000, a commercial building of $476,000 and a commercial lot of $327,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company recognized net gains of $36,000 on disposals of $1.1 million of four residential properties and multiple residential lots for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Bank provided $200,000 in financing for one residential property and the three residential lots which were transferred from OREO to loans during the first quarter of 2017. The transaction qualified for full accrual sales treatment under ASC Topic 360-20-40 “Property Plant and Equipment – Derecognition”. Additions to the valuation allowances of $425,000 and $576,000 were taken to adjust properties to current appraised values for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. OREO carrying amounts reflect management’s estimate of the realizable value of these properties incorporating current appraised values, local real estate market conditions and related costs

At September 30, 2018, greater than 99%, or $204.7 million of the asset-backed securities and bonds issued by GSEs and U.S. Agencies and others were rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s or the equivalent credit rating from another major rating agency compared to greater than 99%, or $162.3 million, at December 31, 2017. Debt securities are evaluated quarterly to determine whether a decline in their value is OTTI. No OTTI charge was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively. Classified securities decreased $129,000 from $651,000 at December 31, 2017 to $522,000 at September 30, 2018.

Gross unrealized losses on HTM and AFS securities increased from $3.1 million at December 31, 2017 to $7.2 million at September 30, 2018 (see Note 10 in Consolidated Financial Statements). Gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 for AFS securities were $3.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of amortized cost of $111.6 million and $69.8 million, respectively. Gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 for HTM securities were $3.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of amortized cost of $97.2 million and $99.2 million, respectively. The change in unrealized losses was the result of changes in interest rates, while credit risks remained stable. The Bank holds over 97% of its AFS and HTM securities as asset-backed securities of GSEs or U.S. Agencies, GSE agency bonds or U.S. government obligations. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold both AFS and HTM securities with unrealized losses until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full value for the securities. The Company believes that the AFS and HTM securities with unrealized losses will either recover in market value or be paid off as agreed.

Liabilities

The following table shows the Company’s liabilities and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		$ Change			% Change
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	217,151	$	159,844	$	57,307			35.9	%
Interest-bearing deposits		1,235,220		946,393		288,827			30.5	%
Total deposits		1,452,371		1,106,237		346,134			31.3	%
Short-term borrowings		5,000		87,500		(82,500	)		(94.3	)%
Long-term debt		20,451		55,498		(35,047	)		(63.2	)%
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures (TRUPs)		12,000		12,000		-			0.0	%
Subordinated notes - 6.25%		23,000		23,000		-			0.0	%
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		13,439		11,769		1,670			14.2	%
Total Liabilities	$	1,526,261	$	1,296,004	$	230,257			17.8	%

Deposits and Borrowings

Total deposits increased $346.1 million, or 31.3%, to $1,452.4 million at September 30, 2018, compared to $1,106.2 million at December 31, 2017.

During the same period, noninterest bearing demand deposits increased $57.3 million, or 35.9%, to $217.2 million (15.0% of total deposits). Transaction deposit accounts increased $355.9 million from $654.6 million (59% of deposits) at December 31, 2017 to $1,010.5 million (70% of deposits) at September 30, 2018. Reciprocal deposits are used to maximize FDIC insurance available to our customers. Reciprocal deposits increased $135.2 million or 145.5% to $228.1 million at September 30, 2018 compared to $92.9 million at December 31, 2017.

At September 30, 2018 total deposits consisted of $1,394.2 million in retail deposits and $58.2 million in brokered deposits. Retail deposits have increased $407.0 million from $987.2 million at December 31, 2017 to $1,394.2 million at September 30, 2018. During the first quarter of 2018, the Bank increased retail deposits $188.7 million, primarily as a result of the County First acquisition. During the second and third quarters of 2018 organic transaction deposit growth was $218.3 million. The success in retail deposit growth and the increased liquidity the Bank has experienced in the second and third quarters was largely due to the acquisition of municipal relationships. Municipal accounts include treasury and cash management services with blended funding as well as other services and products such as payroll, lock box services, positive pay, automated clearing house transactions, etc. The diversity of products and services safeguard the stability of the relationships. Substantially all of the municipal relationships’ balances are maintained in reciprocal deposits. To ensure available liquidity the Company has enhanced procedures to track and manage municipal deposit concentrations and seasonal balance fluctuations. During 2018, the increase in reciprocal deposits have come at a lower funding costs than wholesale funding and in-market time deposits. Reciprocal deposits are more exposed to interest rate sensitivity in rising rate environments than other retail funding sources and the Company will manage the mix of total reciprocal deposit balances to mitigate interest rate risk exposures.

At September 30, 2018 the Company has on-balance sheet liquidity of $179.6 million, which consists of cash and cash equivalents and available for sale (“AFS”) securities. The Company generally does not pledge AFS securities. The Company has $232.3 million in FHLB available lines at September 30, 2018, which does not include any pledged AFS securities. In addition, there was $50.1 million in unpledged held-to-maturity securities available for pledging.

The Company uses brokered deposits and other wholesale funding to supplement funding when loan growth exceeds core deposit growth and for asset-liability management purposes. Brokered deposits have decreased $60.9 million or 51.2% to $58.1 million at September 30, 2018 compared to $119.0 million at December 31, 2017. Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) long-term debt and short-term borrowings (“advances”) decreased $117.5 million, or 82.2%, to $25.5 million at September 30, 2018 compared to $143.0 million at December 31, 2017. Wholesale funding, which includes brokered deposits and FHLB advances, decreased $178.4 million from $261.9 million (18.7% of assets) at December 31, 2017 to $83.6 million (5.0% of assets) at September 30, 2018. Cash and the sale of securities from the County First acquisition during the first quarter and the retail deposit growth in the second and third quarters were used to pay down debt and brokered deposits.

Details of the Company’s deposit portfolio at September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are presented below:

	September 30, 2018					June 30, 2018					March 31, 2018					December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)	Balance		%			Balance		%			Balance		%			Balance		%
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	217,151		14.95	%	$	214,249		16.18	%	$	229,612		17.86	%	$	159,844		14.45	%
Interest-bearing:
Demand		448,299		30.87	%		307,986		23.26	%		217,039		16.88	%		215,447		19.48	%
Money market deposits		274,039		18.87	%		281,975		21.30	%		284,449		22.12	%		226,351		20.46	%
Savings		71,003		4.89	%		73,142		5.52	%		76,360		5.94	%		52,990		4.79	%
Certificates of deposit		441,879		30.42	%		446,516		33.73	%		478,476		37.21	%		451,605		40.82	%
Total interest-bearing		1,235,220		85.05	%		1,109,619		83.82	%		1,056,324		82.14	%		946,393		85.55	%

Total Deposits	$	1,452,371		100.00	%	$	1,323,868		100.00	%	$	1,285,936		100.00	%	$	1,106,237		100.00	%

Transaction accounts	$	1,010,492		69.58	%	$	877,352		66.27	%	$	807,460		62.79	%	$	654,632		59.18	%

Liquidity has improved with the increase in transaction deposits and decrease in wholesale funding. The Company’s net loan to deposit ratio has decreased from 103.1% at December 31, 2017 to 89.4% at September 30, 2018. The Company expects some seasonality in deposits that will likely increase the loan to deposit ratio into the low to mid 90s in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Company intends to use available on-balance sheet liquidity to fund loans, increase investments and pay down wholesale funding.

The Bank uses advances from the FHLB of Atlanta to supplement the supply of funds it may lend and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. Advances from the FHLB are secured by the Bank’s stock in the FHLB, a portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio and certain investments. Generally, the Bank’s ability to borrow from the FHLB of Atlanta is limited by its available collateral and also by an overall limitation of 30% of assets. Further, short-term credit facilities are available at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and other commercial banks. FHLB long-term debt consists of adjustable-rate advances with rates based upon LIBOR, fixed-rate advances, and convertible advances. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 100% of the Bank’s long-term debt was fixed for rate and term, as the conversion optionality of the advances have either been exercised or expired.

Stockholders’ Equity

Total stockholders’ equity increased $40.1 million, or 36.6%, to $150.1 million at September 30, 2018 compared to $110.0 million at December 31, 2017. This increase primarily resulted from the issuance of 918,526 shares of common stock, valued at $35.6 million (based on the $38.78 per share closing price), as the stock component of the merger consideration paid in the County First acquisition. In addition, stockholders’ equity increased due to net income of $7.4 million and net stock related activities related to stock-based compensation and ESOP activity of $297,000. These increases to stockholders’ equity were partially offset by decreases due to common dividends paid of $1.6 million, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive losses of $1.5 million and repurchases of common stock of $67,000.

Common stockholders' equity of $150.1 million and $110.0 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 resulted in a book values per common share of $26.93 and $23.65, respectively. Tangible book value at September 30, 2018 was $24.47. Tangible book value was the same as book value prior to December 31, 2017 because the Company had no intangible assets. The Company’s ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets increased to 8.21% at September 30, 2018 from 7.82% at December 31, 2017. The Company’s Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) ratio was 10.30% at September 30, 2018 compared to 9.51% at December 31, 2017. The Company remains well capitalized at September 30, 2018 with a Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio) of 9.51% at September 30, 2018 compared to 8.79% at December 31, 2017.

The following table shows the Company’s equity and the dollar and percentage changes for the periods presented.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			$ Change			% Change

Common Stock at par of $0.01	$	56		$	46		$	10			21.7	%
Additional paid in capital		84,246			48,209			36,037			74.8	%
Retained earnings		69,295			63,648			5,647			8.9	%
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,633	)		(1,191	)		(1,442	)		121.1	%
Unearned ESOP shares		(816	)		(755	)		(61	)		8.1	%
Total Stockholders' Equity	$	150,148		$	109,957		$	40,191			36.6	%

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Resources

The Company has no business other than holding the stock of the Bank and does not have significant operating cash needs, except for the payment of dividends declared on common stock, and the payment of interest on subordinated debentures and subordinated notes, and noninterest expense.

The Company evaluates capital resources by our ability to maintain adequate regulatory capital ratios. The Company and the Bank annually update a three-year strategic capital plan. In developing its plan, the Company considers the impact to capital of asset growth, income accretion, dividends, holding company liquidity, investment in markets and people and stress testing. Our capital position is reflected in shareholders’ equity, subject to certain adjustments for regulatory purposes. Shareholders’ equity, or capital, is a measure of our net worth, soundness, and viability. At September 30, 2018, we continue to remain in a well-capitalized position. Shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2018 was $150.1 million, compared to $110.0 million at December 31, 2017. The increase in capital during the first nine months of 2018 was principally due to a $35.6 million issuance of stock for the County First acquisition.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company performed ongoing assessments using regulatory capital ratios and determined that the Company meets the new requirements specified in the Basel III rules upon full adoption of such requirements. Our subsidiary bank made the election to retain the AOCI treatment under the prior capital rules in a March 2015 regulatory filing.

Federal banking regulations require the Company and the Bank to maintain specified levels of capital. As of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the Company and Bank were well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action under the Basel III Capital Rules. Management believes, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. See Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity

Liquidity is our ability to meet cash demands as they arise. Such needs can develop from loan demand, deposit withdrawals or acquisition opportunities. Potential obligations resulting from the issuance of standby letters of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan customers are other factors affecting our liquidity needs. Many of these obligations and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position.

Based on management’s going concern evaluation, we believe that there are no conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s or the Bank’s ability to continue as a going concern, within one year of the date of the issuance of the financial statements.

Asset liquidity is provided by cash and assets which are readily marketable or which will mature in the near future. Liquid assets include cash, federal funds sold, and short-term investments in cash deposits with other banks. Liquidity is also provided by access to funding sources, which include core depositors and brokered deposits. Other sources of funds include our ability to borrow, such as purchasing federal funds from correspondent banks, sales of securities under agreements to repurchase and advances from the FHLB.

At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Bank had $35.5 million and $65.6 million, respectively, in loan commitments outstanding. In addition, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Bank had $23.0 million and $17.9 million, respectively, in letters of credit and approximately $225.1 million and $162.2 million, respectively, available under lines of credit. Certificates of deposit due within one year of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 totaled $256.4 million or 58.03% and $312.4 million, or 69.2%, respectively, of total certificates of deposit outstanding. If maturing deposits do not remain, the Bank will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposits. We believe, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand and dividends received from the Bank. The Bank is subject to various regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends.

The Bank’s principal sources of funds for investment and operations are net income, deposits, sales of loans, borrowings, principal and interest payments on loans, principal and interest received on investment securities and proceeds from the maturity and sale of investment securities. The Bank’s principal funding commitments are for the origination or purchase of loans, the purchase of securities and the payment of maturing deposits. Deposits are considered the primary source of funds supporting the Bank’s lending and investment activities. The Bank also uses borrowings from the FHLB of Atlanta to supplement deposits. The amount of FHLB advances available to the Bank is limited to the lower of 30% of Bank assets or the amount supportable by eligible collateral including FHLB stock, loans and securities. In addition, the Bank has established unsecured and secured lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank and commercial banks.

For additional information on these agreements, including collateral, see Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements as presented in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Bank’s most liquid assets are cash, cash equivalents and federal funds sold. The levels of such assets are dependent on the Bank’s operating, financing and investment activities at any given time. The variations in levels of cash and cash equivalents are influenced by deposit flows and anticipated future deposit flows.

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2018 totaled $71.6 million, an increase of $56.2 million from the December 31, 2017 total of $15.4 million. Ending cash balances increased primarily due to proceeds from the sale of investment securities, the increase in net deposits and cash from the County First acquisition. These increases were partially offset by decreases in net total debt outstanding and excess of loans originations over principal collected. Changes to the level of cash and cash equivalents have minimal impact on operational needs as the Bank has substantial sources of funds available from other sources.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, all financing activities provided $27.6 million in cash compared to $59.6 million in cash provided for the same period in 2017. The Company used $32.0 million of additional cash from financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to net decreases of $117.5 million in long-term debt and short-term borrowings and an increase in dividends paid of $270,000, offset by increases in net deposits of $87.7 million and $762,000 less cash used for ESOP shares. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company used cash and the sale of securities acquired in the County First acquisition to pay down wholesale brokered deposits and FHLB debt, which represents the reduction in both deposits and debt. Acquired deposits of approximately $200 million are not included on the cash flow statement.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, all investing activities provided $15.5 million in cash compared to $63.1 million in cash used for the same period in 2017. The increase in cash provided of $78.6 million was primarily the result of net increases in cash provided from $32.5 million of cash from the County First acquisition, $1.4 million from sale of assets, $1.9 million less cash used for securities transactions, $42.9 million less cash used for loan activities, and $124,000 less cash used for purchases of premises and equipment. The Company received $34.9 million from the sale of securities from the County First acquisition in the first nine months of 2018 compared to $7.3 million from sales in the comparable prior year period. Cash provided increased as principal received on loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased over the prior year comparable period. Principal collected on loans increased $33.9 million from $187.5 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $221.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Cash used decreased for the funding of loans originated, which decreased $9.0 million from $247.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $238.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Operating activities provided cash of $13.1 million, or $3.7 million more cash, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $9.4 million of cash provided for the same period of 2017.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Interest rate risk is defined as the exposure to changes in net interest income and capital that arises from movements in interest rates. Depending on the composition of the balance sheet, increasing or decreasing interest rates can negatively affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The Company measures interest rate risk over the short and long term. The Company measures interest rate risk as the change in net interest income (“NII’) caused by a change in interest rates over twelve and twenty-four months. The Company’s NII simulations provide information about short-term interest rate risk exposure. The Company also measures interest rate risk by measuring changes in the values of assets and liabilities due to changes in interest rates. The economic value of equity (“EVE”) is defined as the present value of future cash flows from existing assets, minus the present value of future cash flows from existing liabilities. EVE simulations reflect the interest rate sensitivity of assets and liabilities over a longer time period, considering the maturities, average life and duration of all balance sheet accounts.

The Board of Directors has established an interest rate risk policy, which is administered by the Bank’s Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”). The policy establishes limits on risk, which are quantitative measures of the percentage change in NII and EVE resulting from changes in interest rates. Both NII and EVE simulations assist in identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling interest rate risk and are used by management and the ALCO Committee to ensure that interest rate risk exposure will be maintained within Board policy guidelines. The ALCO Committee reports quarterly to the Board of Directors. Mitigating strategies are used to maintain interest rate risk within established limits.

The Company’s interest rate risk (“IRR”) model uses assumptions which include factors such as call features, prepayment options and interest rate caps and floors included in investment and loan portfolio contracts. Additionally, the IRR model estimates the lives and interest rate sensitivity of the Company’s non-maturity deposits. These assumptions have a significant effect on model results. The assumptions are developed primarily based upon historical behavior of Bank customers. The Company also considers industry and regional data in developing IRR model assumptions. There are inherent limitations in the Company’s IRR model and underlying assumptions. When interest rates change, actual movements of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, loan prepayments, and withdrawals of time and other deposits, may deviate significantly from assumptions used in the model. The Company prepares a current base case and several alternative simulations at least quarterly. Current interest rates are shocked by +/- 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points (“bp”). In addition, the Company simulates additional rate curve scenarios (e.g., bear flattener). The Company may elect not to use particular scenarios that it determines are impractical in a current rate environment. The Company’s internal limits for parallel shock scenarios are as follows:

Shock in Basis Points	Net Interest Income (“NII”)			Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”)
+ - 400		25	%		40	%
+ - 300		20	%		30	%
+ - 200		15	%		20	%
+ - 100		10	%		10	%

It is management’s goal to manage the portfolios of the Bank so that net interest income at risk over a twelve-month and twenty-four month period and the economic value of equity at risk do not exceed policy guidelines at the various interest rate shock levels. As of September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the Company did not exceed any Board approved sensitivity limits. Measures of net interest income at risk produced by simulation analysis are indicators of an institution’s short-term performance in alternative rate environments. The below schedule estimates the changes in net interest income over a twelve-month period for parallel rate shocks for up 200, 100 and down 100 scenarios:

Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income
Change in Interest Rates:	+ 200	bp	+ 100	bp	- 100	bp
Policy Limit	(15.00	)%	(10.00	)%	(10.00	)%

September 30, 2018	0.05	%	0.40	%	(0.40	)%
June 30, 2018	(2.77	)%	(1.22	)%	0.40	%
March 31, 2018	0.72	%	0.47	%	(0.05	)%
December 31, 2017	(1.28	)%	(0.54	)%	(1.30	)%

Measures of equity value at risk indicate the ongoing economic value of the Company by considering the effects of changes in interest rates on all of the Company’s cash flows, and by discounting the cash flows to estimate the present value of assets and liabilities. The below schedule estimates the changes in the economic value of equity at parallel shocks for up 200, 100 and down 100 scenarios:

Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity (EVE)
Change in Interest Rates:	+ 200	bp	+ 100	bp	- 100	bp
Policy Limit	(20.00	)%	(10.00	)%	(10.00	)%

September 30, 2018	5.46	%	5.83	%	9.77	%
June 30, 2018	(1.00	)%	0.19	%	18.14	%
March 31, 2018	(6.54	)%	(3.08	)%	7.92	%
December 31, 2017	(13.15	)%	(6.01	)%	18.35	%

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management of the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon certain reasonable assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no reasonable assurance that any design of disclosure controls and procedures will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote, but the Company’s principal executive and financial officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at a reasonable assurance level. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings – The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings. The Bank is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Item 1A - Risk Factors - In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A- Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

Not applicable

(b)

Not applicable

(c)

On May 4, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a repurchase plan (“2015 repurchase plan). The 2015 repurchase plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 250,000 shares of outstanding common stock. The 2015 repurchase plan will continue until it is completed or terminated by the Company’s Board of Directors. During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, the 2015 repurchase plan began with the termination of the 2008 repurchase program. As of September 30, 2018, 186,757 shares were available to be repurchased under the 2015 repurchase program. The following schedule shows repurchases during the three months ended September 30, 2018.

(c)

Total Number

of Shares

(d)

Purchased

Maximum

(a)

as Part of

Number of Shares

Total

(b)

Publicly

that May Yet Be

Number of

Average

Announced Plans

Purchased Under

Price Paid

the Plans or

Period

Purchased

per Share

Programs

July 1-31, 2018

186,757

August 1-31, 2018

186,757

September 1-30, 2018

186,757

Total

186,757

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None

Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures – Not Applicable

Item 5 - Other Information – None

Item 6 – Exhibits

Exhibit 31 - Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

Exhibit 32 - Section 1350 Certifications

Exhibit 101.0 - The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	THE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Date: November 9, 2018	By:	/s/ William J. Pasenelli
		William J. Pasenelli
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2018	By:	/s/ Todd L. Capitani
		Todd L. Capitani
		Chief Financial Officer