UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

PulteGroup, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

PULTEGROUP, INC.

3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 150

Atlanta, Georgia 30326

NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Atlanta, Georgia

March 25, 2019

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information about the items to be voted on at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders (“annual meeting”) of PulteGroup, Inc. (“PulteGroup,” the “Company,” “we” or “our”). This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in deciding how to vote. You should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

  See pages 3-13 for further information  

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Name

Principal Professional Experience

Years of Tenure

Gender or Ethnic Diversity

Current Committee Memberships(1)

Independence

Audit

Comp

Finance

Nom   /Gov

Brian P. Anderson

Former Chief Financial Officer, Baxter International Inc.

14

●

●

Bryce Blair Non-Executive Chairman

Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, AvalonBay Communities, Inc.

8

Richard W. Dreiling

Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Dollar General Corporation

4

●

●

Thomas J. Folliard

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and Former President and Chief Executive Officer, CarMax, Inc.

7

●

●

Cheryl W. Grisé

Former Executive Vice President, Northeast Utilities (now known as Eversource Energy)

11

●

André J. Hawaux

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.

6

●

Ryan R. Marshall

President and Chief Executive Officer, PulteGroup, Inc.

3

●

John R. Peshkin

Founder and Managing Partner, Vanguard Land, LLC

3

●

Scott F. Powers

Former President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Global Advisors

3

●

William J. Pulte

Chief Executive Officer, Pulte Capital Partners LLC

3

●

●

Lila Snyder

Executive Vice President and President, Commerce Services, Pitney Bowes, Inc.

1

●

●

(1) These columns show the current committee memberships of the director nominees.

ii

Board Nominee Highlights

Governance Highlights

PulteGroup has a long-standing commitment to strong corporate governance and throughout the years has evolved its governance framework to align with best practices. In particular, we believe that the following corporate governance features help us best serve the interests of our shareholders:

iii

iv

Executive Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed to reward executives for producing sustainable growth and improving shareholder returns consistent with our strategic plan and to align compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders. In accordance with this pay for performance philosophy, PulteGroup compensates its named executive officers using a mix of cash and equity compensation elements with an emphasis on short-term and long-term performance:

v

PulteGroup is also committed to having strong governance standards with respect to our executive compensation program, policies and practices. Consistent with this focus, we maintain the following policies and practices that we believe demonstrate our commitment to executive compensation best practices.

vi

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

PROXY STATEMENT

The board of directors of PulteGroup, Inc. (“PulteGroup,” the “Company,” “we” or “our”) is soliciting proxies on behalf of the Company to be used at the annual meeting of shareholders (the “annual meeting”) to be held on May 8, 2019, at 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, at 3350 Peachtree Road Northeast, Atlanta, Georgia 30326. In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company is making this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) available to our shareholders electronically via the internet. In addition, the Company is using the SEC’s Notice and Access Rules to provide shareholders with more options for receipt of these materials. Accordingly, on or about March 25, 2019, the Company will be mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and Notice of Annual Meeting (the “Notice”) to our shareholders containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on the internet, how to vote online or by telephone, and how to receive paper copies of the documents and a proxy card.

2

BOARD OF DIRECTORS INFORMATION

Board of Directors Qualifications and Attributes

PulteGroup’s board of directors (the “Board” or “board of directors”) annually reviews the skills and experiences which should be represented on the Board. As a result of the review conducted in 2017, the Board developed the following matrix which sets forth the collective experiences and qualifications of the directors that will continue to drive effective oversight of the Company. The Board reaffirmed this set of experiences and qualifications in assessing nominees for 2019.

In addition to these competencies and experiences, the Board also believes that integrity, business judgment, leadership skills, dedication and collaboration are personal attributes that are vital to the Board’s ability to effectively oversee the Company and act in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. More detail regarding the Company’s individual directors is provided below. In addition to these personal characteristics and qualifications, PulteGroup highly values the collective experience and qualifications of the directors. PulteGroup believes that the diverse set of collective experiences, viewpoints and perspectives of its directors results in a Board with the commitment and energy to advance the interests of PulteGroup’s shareholders.

In March 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee amended its charter to express the Nominating and Governance Committee’s commitment to the inclusion of diverse groups (including, where appropriate, diversity of age,

3

gender, race, ethnicity and professional experience), knowledge and viewpoints in its selection of Board nominees. When adding new Board members or filling vacancies, the Nominating and Governance Committee will conduct its search consistent with its amended charter and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Consistent with this charter amendment, the Board appointed Lila Snyder as a director in August 2018 to further enhance the collective experiences and qualifications of the Board.

Independence

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available to shareholders at http://www.pultegroupinc.com/investors/corporate-governance/guidelines/default.aspx, a substantial majority of the members of our Board must be independent. The Board has adopted categorical independence standards to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee in determining director independence, which standards either meet or exceed the independence requirements of the NYSE corporate governance standards. Under these standards, no director can qualify as independent unless (i) the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company, directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a relationship with the Company, and (ii) the director meets the following categorical standards:

In addition, Audit Committee members may not have any direct or indirect financial relationship whatsoever with the Company other than as directors.

The Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing director independence, including the Pulte Agreement (as defined and described below in the section entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors”). In particular, the

4

Board considered that our Board member William J. Pulte (“Mr. Pulte”), the grandson of the founder of the Company, William Pulte (the “Founder”), has no voting control, authority or ownership interest in either the William Pulte Trust dtd 01/26/90 or the Joan Pulte trust dtd 01/26/90 (collectively, the “Pulte Trusts”) and that the decisions made by Mr. Pulte are not influenced by the Pulte Trusts. In connection with this assessment, the Board affirmatively determined that Brian P. Anderson, Bryce Blair, Richard W. Dreiling, Thomas J. Folliard, Cheryl W. Grisé, André J. Hawaux, John R. Peshkin, Scott F. Powers, William J. Pulte and Lila Snyder are independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the NYSE listing standards. The Board also affirmatively determined that Joshua Gotbaum and Patrick J. O’Leary, who served as directors through the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, were independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the NYSE listing standards. The Board further determined that Ryan R. Marshall, who is a current PulteGroup employee, is not independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the NYSE listing standards.

5

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, require that we have at least three, but no more than 15, directors. The exact number of directors is set by the Board and is currently eleven. All directors will be elected on an annual basis for one-year terms. The eleven directors comprising the Board, all of whose terms are expiring at the annual meeting, are Brian P. Anderson, Bryce Blair, Richard W. Dreiling, Thomas J. Folliard, Cheryl W. Grisé, André J. Hawaux, Ryan R. Marshall, John R. Peshkin, Scott F. Powers, William J. Pulte and Lila Snyder. As previously disclosed, Ms. Snyder was appointed to the Board on August 27, 2018, after a search conducted with the assistance of a third-party search firm.

On September 8, 2016, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Pulte Agreement”) with the Founder, Mr. Pulte and the Pulte Trusts. Pursuant to the Pulte Agreement, the board of directors appointed Mr. Pulte to the board of directors as of September 8, 2016.    In addition, Ryan. R. Marshall, PulteGroup’s President and Chief Executive Officer, was recommended to the board of directors by the CEO Search Committee of the Board in connection with his appointment to that position on September 8, 2016.

The by-laws of the Company provide that a nominee for director at the annual meeting shall be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election (with “abstentions” and “broker non-votes” not counted as a vote cast either “for” or “against” that director’s election). If a nominee for director, who is an incumbent director, is not elected, the director shall promptly tender his or her resignation to the board of directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the board of directors as to whether to accept or reject the resignation of such incumbent director, or whether other action should be taken. The board of directors shall act on the resignation, taking into account the committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose (by a press release, a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission or other broadly disseminated means of communication) its decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days following certification of the election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the recommendation of the committee or the decision of the board of directors with respect to his or her resignation.

The eleven directors listed below are the nominees to serve a one-year term expiring at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, and each has agreed to serve the one-year term for which he or she has been nominated, if elected. Please see below for a description of the occupations and recent business experience of all director nominees. In addition, the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating and Governance Committee to the conclusion that each of the director nominees should serve as a director of the Company are included in the descriptions below.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board has four standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. The committees are currently the Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Finance and Investment Committee. Charters for all of these committees are available on the Company’s website at www.pultegroup.com. The table below shows current membership for each of the standing Board committees.

Chair

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee met 7 times in 2018. The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board with the oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and internal controls, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements and the independent auditor’s engagement, qualifications and independence, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the evaluation of certain enterprise risk issues. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the report of the Audit Committee required to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement.

The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting (subject to ratification by our shareholders) the independent auditor as well as setting the compensation for and overseeing the work of the independent auditor and approving audit services to be provided by the independent auditor. Brian P. Anderson currently serves on the audit committee of more than three public companies. The Board has determined that Mr. Anderson’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of more than three public companies will not impair his ability to serve effectively on the Company’s audit committee. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the applicable NYSE and SEC rules and financially literate as defined by the NYSE rules, and that Brian P. Anderson, Thomas J. Folliard, André J. Hawaux and John R. Peshkin are audit committee financial experts for purposes of the SEC’s rules.

Compensation and Management Development Committee

The Compensation and Management Development Committee met 4 times in 2018. The Compensation and Management Development Committee is responsible for the review, approval and administration of the compensation and benefit programs for the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers. It also reviews and makes

13

recommendations regarding the Company’s general compensation philosophy and incentive plans and certain other compensation plans; reviews the Company’s leadership development programs and initiatives; and discusses performance, leadership development and succession planning for key officers with the Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Compensation and Management Development Committee is independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the NYSE rules.

Mr. Scott F. Powers is currently the Chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee. Mr. Powers works with Ms. Michelle Hairston, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Human Resources, to establish meeting agendas and determine whether any members of PulteGroup’s management or outside advisors should attend meetings. The Compensation and Management Development Committee also meets regularly in executive session. At various times during the year at the request of the Compensation and Management Development Committee, Ryan R. Marshall, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; Robert T. O’Shaughnessy, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and Todd N. Sheldon, the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company, may attend Compensation and Management Development Committee meetings, or portions of Compensation and Management Development Committee meetings, to provide the Compensation and Management Development Committee with information regarding the Company’s operational performance, financial performance or other topics requested by the Compensation and Management Development Committee to assist it in making its compensation decisions.

The Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each member of senior management (other than our Chief Executive Officer’s performance, whose performance is reviewed by the Compensation and Management Development Committee). Recommendations based on these reviews, including salary adjustments, annual bonuses, long-term incentives and equity grants, are presented to the Compensation and Management Development Committee. Decisions regarding salary adjustments, annual bonuses, long-term incentives and equity grants for our Chief Executive Officer are made by the Compensation and Management Development Committee. All decisions for 2018 made with respect to the executives listed in the Summary Compensation Table (other than the Chief Executive Officer) were made after deliberation with Mr. Marshall.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee is also responsible for overseeing the development of the Company’s succession plan for the President and Chief Executive Officer and other key members of senior management, as well as the Company’s leadership development programs.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee receives and reviews materials provided by the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s consultant and management. These materials include information that the consultant and management believe will be helpful to the Compensation and Management Development Committee, as well as materials the Compensation and Management Development Committee specifically requests.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has the authority to engage its own outside compensation consultant and any other advisors it deems necessary. Since 2003, the Compensation and Management Development Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”) to act as its independent consultant. Pearl Meyer regularly provides the Compensation and Management Development Committee with information regarding market compensation levels, general compensation trends and best practices. The Compensation and Management Development Committee also regularly asks Pearl Meyer to opine on the reasonableness of specific pay decisions and actions for the named executive officers, as well as the appropriateness of the design of the Company’s executive compensation programs.

The activities of Pearl Meyer are directed by the Compensation and Management Development Committee, although Pearl Meyer may communicate with members of management, as appropriate, to gather data and prepare analyses as requested by the Compensation and Management Development Committee. During 2018, the Compensation and Management Development Committee asked Pearl Meyer to review market data and advise the Committee on setting executive compensation and the competitiveness and reasonableness of the Company’s executive compensation program; review and advise the Compensation and Management Development Committee regarding the Company’s pay for performance, equity grant and dilution levels, each as relative to the Company’s peers; review and advise the Compensation and Management Development Committee regarding regulatory, disclosure and other technical matters; and review and advise the Compensation and Management Development Committee regarding the Company’s compensation risk assessment procedures. The Compensation and Management Development Committee also asked Pearl Meyer to provide opinions on named executive officer pay decisions.

14

In 2018, Pearl Meyer did not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation and Management Development Committee assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work for the Compensation and Management Development Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has determined that Pearl Meyer is independent because it does no work for the Company other than that requested by the Compensation and Management Development Committee. The Chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee reviews the consultant’s invoices, which are paid by the Company.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee met 4 times in 2018. The Nominating and Governance Committee establishes criteria for the selection of new members of the board of directors and makes recommendations to the Board based on qualified identified individuals, including any qualified candidates nominated by shareholders, as described in “Director Nomination Recommendations” below. As noted above, in March 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee amended its charter to express the Nominating and Governance Committee’s commitment to the inclusion of diverse groups (including, where appropriate, diversity of age, gender, race, ethnicity and professional experience), knowledge and viewpoints in its selection of Board nominees.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is also responsible for matters related to the governance of the Company and for developing and recommending to the Board the criteria for Board membership, the selection of new Board members and the assignment of directors to the committees of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee assures that a regular evaluation is conducted of the performance, qualifications, and integrity of the Board and the committees of the Board. Please see “Corporate Governance—Board Assessments” for further information regarding the regular evaluations. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews and makes recommendations with respect to the compensation of members of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee is also responsible for reviewing the Company’s Environmental, Social and Governance Policies and assessing and monitoring the Company’s enterprise risk management initiatives. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of the Company’s categorical standards and the NYSE rules.

Finance and Investment Committee

The Finance and Investment Committee met 5 times in 2018. The Finance and Investment Committee reviews all aspects of the Company’s policies that relate to the management of the Company’s financial affairs. The Finance and Investment Committee also reviews the Company’s long-term strategic plans and annual budgets, capital commitments budget, certain land acquisition and sale transactions, and the Company’s cash needs and funding plans.

Board Meeting Information

The board of directors held a total of 6 meetings in 2018. During 2018, each director attended at least 90% of the aggregate number of meetings of the board of directors and of the committees on which such director served that were held during the period that such director served as a member of the board of directors and as a member of such committees.

PulteGroup encourages its directors to attend each of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders, and all of our directors serving on the date of last year’s annual meeting of shareholders attended that meeting.

Throughout the year, PulteGroup held regularly scheduled executive sessions of its non-management directors without management participation. In addition, in 2019, PulteGroup will hold at least one executive session of its non-management directors without the participation of management. Since the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, Bryce Blair, our Non-Executive Chairman, has presided at these executive sessions. Provided that Mr. Blair is re-elected at the annual meeting, he will continue to preside over the executive sessions as the Non-Executive Chairman (as discussed further below).

15

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Highlights

The Board continues to take steps that we believe improve our corporate governance and position our Company for long-term success. Recently, these steps have included:

Governance Guidelines; Code of Ethical Business Conduct; Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which reflect the principles by which PulteGroup operates. The guidelines address an array of governance issues and principles including: director independence, committee independence, management succession, annual Board evaluations, director nominations, director age limitations, the role of the Chairman or Lead Director, and executive sessions of the independent directors. PulteGroup’s Governance Guidelines are available for viewing on our website at www.pultegroup.com. The Board also has adopted a Code of Ethical Business Conduct, which applies to all directors and employees and a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller and other senior officers. The Code of Ethical Business Conduct and the Code of Ethics are also available on the Company’s website, and the Company intends to include on its website any waivers of its Code of Ethical Business Conduct that relate to executive officers and directors as well as any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of its Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.

Board Leadership

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines currently contemplate that the independent directors will annually designate one of the independent directors to serve as Non-Executive Chairman for a one-year term. As noted above, the Board appointed Bryce Blair as Chairman of the Board, and since the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, Mr. Blair has served as the Non-Executive Chairman. Provided that Mr. Blair is re-elected at the annual meeting, as an independent director, he would continue to serve as Non-Executive Chairman.

Since Mr. Blair’s appointment as the Non-Executive Chairman, he has worked with the President and Chief Executive Officer to ensure that the Board discharges its responsibilities, has procedures in place to enable it to function independently of management and clearly understands the respective roles and responsibilities of the Board and management. In addition, the Non-Executive Chairman’s duties have included convening and chairing regular executive session meetings of the non-management directors and, as appropriate, providing prompt feedback to the President and Chief Executive Officer; coordinating and developing the agenda for executive sessions of the independent directors; convening meetings of the independent directors if necessary; coordinating feedback to the President and Chief Executive Officer on behalf of the independent directors regarding business issues and management; providing final approval, after consultation with the President and Chief Executive Officer, as to the agendas for meetings of the Board and informational needs associated with those agendas and presentations; performing such other duties as may be necessary for the Board to fulfill its responsibilities or as may be requested by the Board as a whole or by the non-management directors; serving as the designated spokesperson for the Board when it is appropriate for the Board to comment publicly on any matter; and being available for consultation and communication if requested by the Company’s major shareholders.

16

The Board recognizes that no single leadership model is right for all companies at all times, and as appropriate, the Board will continue to review its leadership model to determine the correct leadership structure for the Company.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board’s involvement in risk oversight includes both formal and informal processes and involves the Board and committees of the Board.

On an annual basis, the Board or selected committees of the Board undertake a formal enterprise risk assessment during which the principal risks facing PulteGroup and associated responses are evaluated. In addition to the formal assessment, the Board and committees of the Board are also involved in risk oversight on a more informal basis at regular Board and committee meetings. The Audit Committee receives materials on a frequent basis to address the identification and status of risks to the Company, including financial risks, litigation claims and risks, and cybersecurity risks. At meetings of the full Board, these risks are identified to Board members, and the Chair of the Audit Committee reports on the activities of the Audit Committee regarding risk analysis. In addition, two times per year, the Audit Committee receives a report from PulteGroup’s Ethics Committee regarding current hotline activities and associated responses. The other committees of the Board also consider and address risks as they perform their respective responsibilities, and such committees report to the full Board from time to time as appropriate, including whenever a matter rises to a material or enterprise level risk. The Board also receives regular financial and business updates from senior management, which involve detailed reports on financial and business risks facing PulteGroup when applicable.

Board Assessments

Each year, the Nominating and Governance Committee leads a confidential assessment process under which our Board and its committees conduct self-assessments. Additionally, every other year, the Nominating and Governance Committee leads a confidential assessment process under which each individual director completes a formal self-assessment and an assessment of each other director. The following is a summary of the assessment process:

In 2018, the Board and committee assessments were completed in September and contributed to the affirmation of the experience and qualifications matrix referenced previously on page 3. Our Board intends to review the matrix for appropriate revisions at least annually.

17

Available information about PulteGroup

The following information is available on PulteGroup’s website at www.pultegroup.com and in print for any shareholder upon written request to our Corporate Secretary:

18

DIRECTOR NOMINATION RECOMMENDATIONS

The Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a single method for identifying director candidates but will consider candidates suggested by a wide range of sources, including candidates recommended by shareholders. The Committee reviews the qualifications of various persons to determine whether they might make good candidates for consideration for membership on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will review all proposed nominees, including those proposed by shareholders, in accordance with its charter and PulteGroup’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers the experience and skills for potential candidates adopted by the Board and summarized in the matrix on page 3. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee will review the person’s judgment, experience, qualifications, independence, understanding of PulteGroup’s business or other related industries and such other factors as the Nominating and Governance Committee determines are relevant in light of the needs of the Board and PulteGroup.

The Board also believes that diversity is an important goal and looks for potential candidates who will help ensure that the Board has the benefit of a wide range of attributes. As noted above, in March 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee amended its charter to express the Nominating and Governance Committee’s commitment to the inclusion of diverse groups (including, where appropriate, diversity of age, gender, race, ethnicity and professional experience), knowledge and viewpoints in its selection of Board nominees.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will select qualified candidates and review its recommendations with the Board, which will decide whether to invite the candidate to be a nominee for election to the Board.

You may recommend a person to be nominated for director by submitting a written proposal by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by recognized overnight courier, to Todd N. Sheldon, Corporate Secretary, PulteGroup, Inc., 3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 150, Atlanta, Georgia 30326. Shareholders wishing to directly nominate a candidate for election as a director at next year’s annual meeting of shareholders must deliver written notice to PulteGroup at the above address not later than 60 days prior to the date of next year’s annual meeting of shareholders (unless public disclosure of the date of such meeting is made less than 70 days before such meeting, in which case notice must be received within 10 days following such public disclosure), and the required notice must include the information and documents set forth in the Company’s by-laws.

In addition, the Company’s by-laws permit proxy access. The proxy access by-law provision permits a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the board, whichever is greater, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Company’s by-laws. Shareholders wishing to directly nominate a candidate for election as a director at next year’s annual meeting of shareholders and have such nomination included in the Company’s proxy materials must deliver written notice to PulteGroup at the above address not later than 120 days nor more than 150 days in advance of the date the Company’s proxy statement was released to security holders for the annual meeting (unless the date of such meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date contemplated at this time), and the required notice must include the information and documents set forth in the by-laws.

19

2018 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The table below shows compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Ryan R. Marshall, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and also a director of the Company, received no additional compensation for his services as a director of the Company during 2018. The compensation received by Mr. Marshall as an employee of the Company is shown in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table set forth in this Proxy Statement.

20

Director Compensation

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the compensation of the Company’s non-employee directors. For 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee did not make any changes to the non-employee director compensation program. During 2018, non-employee directors received the following compensation for service as members of the Board of Directors and as members of Board committees:

For their service during 2018, Mr. Gotbaum and Mr. O’Leary received prorated annual cash retainer fees and Ms. Snyder received prorated annual cash and annual equity retainer fees, each based on the fees noted above.

In 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee approved an increase in the annual equity retainer fee to $150,000, beginning with grants made immediately following the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.

Director Deferred Compensation

In 2018, non-employee directors were entitled to defer all or a portion of their cash and equity compensation. Deferred cash payments were credited with interest at a rate equal to the five year U.S. treasury rate, plus 2%. Under the “Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors,” the payment of director cash fees may be deferred for up to eight years, and directors may elect to receive their deferred fees in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period not to exceed eight years. In the event of the director’s departure either before or after the commencement of a deferral period, such director’s deferred fees will be paid in a lump sum payment. Under the terms of the plan, all deferred equity will be distributed to the director upon his or her departure from the Board.

Directors who also are our employees do not receive any of the compensation described above.

Equity Ownership Guidelines

Each member of the Board of Directors is expected to maintain an equity investment in the Company equal to at least five times the annual cash retainer, which must be achieved within five years of the director’s initial election to the Board. The holdings that may be counted toward achieving the equity investment guidelines include outstanding share awards or units, shares obtained through stock option exercises, shares owned jointly with or separately by the director’s spouse and shares purchased on the open market. Outstanding stock options do not count toward achieving the equity investment guidelines. As of the record date, all members of the Board of Directors have met or, within the applicable period, are expected to meet, these share ownership guidelines.

21

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (our “CD&A”) provides an overview of our executive compensation program for 2018 and our executive compensation philosophies and objectives. This CD&A is divided into five sections:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview

2018 was an outstanding year for PulteGroup with solid financial and operational performance driven by disciplined execution in a changing economic environment. Our Chief Executive Officer, Ryan Marshall, led PulteGroup through increasingly competitive and dynamic housing, labor and commodity markets to achieve double digit growth in closings and home sale revenue. Despite increases in interest rates and other market factors that led to slowing demand beginning in the second quarter of 2018, we believe PulteGroup’s leadership is well prepared to navigate an evolving housing market.

Additional highlights of our 2018 performance include:

22

We believe our compensation philosophy and execution supports PulteGroup’s strategy to drive consistently high returns through the cycles inherent in the U.S. housing market. Our compensation planning is designed to focus executives on balancing short-term objectives against long-term priorities, to align executive and shareholder interests, and to attract and retain the leadership needed to continue to deliver strong results. Pay decisions were made in the context of our financial performance relative to our goals, while considering external factors and the actions management has taken to strengthen PulteGroup’s position for the future. We believe that it is important for our compensation program to be adaptable to allow us to address our current operating plan and external factors impacting our performance and, accordingly, the Compensation and Management Development Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”) regularly monitors and refines our executive compensation program so that it is reflective of our operating plan and such external factors. For example, in 2018, we introduced a Growth Incentive Pool, designed to address the inherent volatility in the homebuilding industry year-over year and to incentivize the efforts to be taken to reach internal pre-tax income growth targets, which we believe, in turn, will drive overall company growth. Under the Growth Incentive Pool, our executive officers are eligible to share in a pool funded by our pre-tax income growth as compared to 2017.

For 2018, at target, approximately 89% of Mr. Marshall’s pay was at risk and subject to attainment of specific performance goals or fluctuations in our stock price, as demonstrated by the chart below:

CEO 2018 Total Direct Compensation^*

* Growth Incentive pool reflects actual 2018 payout.

For additional information, see “Pay for Performance” on page 25 of this Proxy Statement.

For 2018, the Committee made the following changes to Mr. Marshall’s compensation:

These changes to Mr. Marshall’s compensation reflected, among other things, the Committee’s acknowledgement of Mr. Marshall and the Company’s strong performance in 2017, a desire to align Mr. Marshall’s compensation more closely with the competitive market, and an emphasis on tying a greater portion of Mr. Marshall’s overall compensation to profitable growth with the additional pre-tax income growth measure.

23

For 2018 performance, the Committee approved annual incentive payments of approximately $4,228,696 for Mr. Marshall, reflecting a payout under the annual incentive program of $2,601,813 (156.5% of target) and a Growth Incentive Pool allocation based on pre-tax income growth of $1,626,884. We believe these payouts resulted from meaningful progress in the implementation of PulteGroup’s strategy of generating cash flows to fund growth, with continued improvements in build quality measurements and continued focus on cost containment. In addition, the Committee noted continued improvements in employee engagement and major steps taken to develop and strengthen senior management.

For additional information, see “Pay for Performance” on page 25 of this Proxy Statement

Return to Shareholders*

The following chart shows how a $100 investment in the Company’s common shares on December 31, 2013 would have grown to $137.52 on December 31, 2018, with dividends reinvested quarterly. The chart also compares the total shareholder return (“TSR”) on the Company’s common shares to the same investment in the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, with dividends reinvested quarterly. We believe this chart illustrates the significant value created for shareholders over the five-year period as compared to both indices.

Comparison of Five-Year Total Shareholder Return*

*Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2013, and the reinvestment of dividends.

24

The following chart illustrates the Company’s relative TSR over the last one-, three- and five-year periods versus our defined executive compensation peer group as listed on page 29, including quarterly dividends. As illustrated, we have performed favorably over varying market conditions over the last one-, three- and five-year periods versus this peer group.

Pay for Performance

Our executive compensation program is designed to reward executives for producing sustainable growth and improving shareholder returns consistent with PulteGroup’s strategy and to align compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Committee strongly believes that executive compensation—both pay opportunities and pay actually realized—should be at-risk and tied to Company performance relative to the Company’s goals. For example, beginning in 2014, the Company has incorporated a TSR performance metric into its annual equity grant. In addition, the Committee designed the 2018 executive compensation program so that variable pay elements (annual incentive awards, restricted share units and performance-based awards) constitute a significant portion of the executive compensation awarded, determined at target levels. The following charts demonstrate the variable pay elements as compared to the targeted annual compensation of our named executive officers. These charts demonstrate that the variable pay elements comprised at least 89% of the targeted annual compensation for our President and Chief Executive Officer and, on average, 78% of the targeted annual compensation for the other named executive officers.

25

CEO 2018 Total Direct Compensation^*

NEO 2018 Total Direct Compensation^*

* Growth Incentive pool reflects actual 2018 payout.

26

Key Executive Compensation Decisions and Actions

We are committed to having strong governance standards with respect to our executive compensation program, policies and practices. Consistent with this focus, we maintain the following policies and practices that we believe demonstrate our commitment to executive compensation best practices.

Shareholder Feedback

In its compensation review process, the Committee considers whether our executive compensation and benefits program serves the interests of our shareholders. In that respect, as part of its on-going review of our executive compensation program, the Committee considered the approval by approximately 92.4% of the votes cast for the Company’s “say on pay” vote at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Committee was pleased with this favorable outcome and interpreted this level of support as an endorsement by our shareholders of our executive compensation program and policies and did not make any changes to our executive compensation program in response to the 2018 “say on pay” vote. The Committee values continuing and constructive feedback from our shareholders on compensation, and Messrs. Blair, Marshall, and O’Shaughnessy, among other board members and executive officers, have discussed the Company’s executive compensation program with various shareholders and have shared this shareholder feedback with the Committee. The Committee intends to continue to monitor our executive compensation program and engage with shareholders regarding such program.

Named Executive Officers

For 2018, our named executive officers were:

*Mr. Smith retires from the Company, effective March 29, 2019.

27

ESTABLISHING AND EVALUATING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation Philosophy

To align the Company’s incentive compensation program with the Company’s overall executive compensation philosophy, the Committee has adopted the following compensation philosophy and guiding principles:

Key Factors in Setting 2018 Compensation

In establishing and evaluating our 2018 executive compensation program, the Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, considered the following key factors:

Market Comparisons

While the Committee considers relevant market pay practices when setting executive compensation, it does not believe that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based only on market practices. The Committee believes that compensation decisions are complex and require a deliberate review of Company performance and peer compensation levels, as well as the overall business environment and the role and contributions of each individual. Accordingly, the review of peer information is one of many factors the Committee considers in determining compensation levels. For each element of compensation, the Committee reviews market data (i.e., peer group and survey data) to evaluate target compensation levels, while also considering the expanded responsibilities of some of our named executive officers as compared to the peer group, revenue size relative to the peer group, our historical compensation practices, the overall mix of our compensation elements being weighted more heavily toward long-term and equity-based compensation, management ownership and financial performance. Other factors that influence the amount of compensation awarded

28

include an individual’s experience and past performance inside or outside the Company, compensation history, role and responsibilities within the Company, tenure with the Company and associated institutional knowledge, long-term potential with the Company, contributions derived from creative and innovative thinking and leadership and industry expertise.

The Committee believes that the Company’s peer group should reflect the industry in which the Company competes for business and executive talent. Accordingly, the Company’s peer group includes companies meeting the following criteria: (i) companies within, or operating in an industry similar to, the home-building industry and (ii) companies of similar size in terms of revenue or market capitalization (generally 1/2 to 2 times the Company’s revenue and market capitalization). In evaluating companies to include in our peer group, the Committee also reviewed the say-on-pay history for each of the companies to understand the alignment of the executive compensation programs at those companies with the interests and views of the shareholders of such companies. The peer group used for evaluating 2018 compensation decisions consisted of the companies below. This group is the same peer group that was used for evaluating 2017 compensation decisions, except for (i) the addition of Taylor Morrison Home Corporation as that company was determined by the Committee to satisfy the peer selection criteria noted above and (ii) the removal of CalAtlantic Group, Inc. due to its acquisition by Lennar Corporation.

In addition to reviewing compensation practices among the compensation peer group, the Committee believes it is important to review compensation practices within the general industry. The Company participates in and purchases a number of compensation surveys. With the assistance of Pearl Meyer, the Committee reviews a blend of general industry and peer group survey data in establishing target compensation levels and evaluating whether our compensation policies are in line with market data. The 2018 survey data was compiled from the following general industry compensation surveys: Mercer Human Resource Consulting’s US Mercer Benchmark Database (MBD) Executive (which has approximately 2,600 participating companies) and Willis Towers Watson Executive Compensation Survey (which has approximately 777 participating companies). To assist the Committee in its review of the general industry survey data, Pearl Meyer extracts compensation information from the surveys with respect to companies with annual revenues ranging from $5 billion to $10 billion. The Committee believes that the compensation practices at companies of this size are most relevant to the Committee’s decision-making process.

Based on Pearl Meyer’s competitive market analysis prepared for evaluating 2018 compensation decisions, the Committee found that each element of target compensation for the named executive officers was competitive with the market data. In its analysis, Pearl Meyer noted that our target compensation was positioned appropriately within the competitive range of our peer group. As noted above, the Committee also considered the expanded responsibilities of some of our named executive officers as compared to the peer group, revenue size relative to the peer group, our historical compensation practices, the overall mix of our compensation elements being weighted more heavily toward long-term and equity-based compensation, management ownership and financial performance, as well as the other individual factors noted above.

Please see the section entitled “How We Make Executive Compensation Decisions” for a discussion of the decision-making process for determining executive compensation, including the roles of the Committee and executive officers, the role of the independent compensation consultant and the use of tally sheets.

29

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM ELEMENTS

The Committee has designed the elements of the compensation program for the named executive officers to advance the operational objectives and the long-term strategies of the Company. The following table lists the material elements of our 2018 executive compensation program. The Committee believes that the design of the Company’s executive compensation program balances fixed and variable compensation elements and provides alignment with our short and long-term financial and operational priorities and shareholder interests through the annual and long-term incentive compensation programs. Our incentives are designed to drive overall corporate and individual performance, with compensation payouts varying from target based on actual performance against pre-established and communicated performance objectives.

30

31

Base Salary

The Committee determines the appropriateness of executives’ base salaries by considering the responsibilities of their positions, their individual performance and tenure, a comparison to the base salary levels of executives in the compensation peer group and the general industry compensation surveys and the recommendations of Pearl Meyer. Base salary increases are considered annually and are based upon both individual and Company performance in the prior year; however, historically the Committee has not had a practice of regularly adjusting base salaries for our executive officers on an annual basis.

In 2018, the Committee increased the base salaries of Messrs. Marshall and Smith from $900,000 to $950,000 and $700,000 to $750,000, respectively, in order to further align with market data and to reflect individual performance and each executive’s tenure within his position.

The table below sets forth the 2017 and 2018 base salary levels for each of our named executive officers.

Annual Incentive Compensation

We provide annual incentive compensation in order to motivate and reward our named executive officers for achieving short-term performance objectives. Annual incentive compensation is intended to be a significant component of an executive’s total compensation opportunity in a given year, helping create a “pay-for-performance” culture. In 2018, there were two components to the Company’s annual incentive compensation program. For the first component, the Committee established a 2018 Annual Incentive Program (the “Annual Program” or the “2018 Annual Program”) similar to its historical approach, with payouts determined based on the Company’s performance against pre-established financial performance goals. This component is designed to reward progress against the achievement of the Company’s annual operating plan. The second component was in the form of an annual incentive pool (the “Growth Incentive Pool”), with funding based on the Company’s pre-tax income growth as compared to 2017. The Committee established the Growth Incentive Pool and associated Growth Incentive Pool allocations to further align the Company’s executive compensation program with market practices in the home-building industry and after considering input from Pearl Meyer. The Growth Incentive Pool is designed to reward growth and be aligned with the interests of the Company’s shareholders, with management experiencing higher payouts in times of growth and success for the Company and receiving diminished or no payouts during challenging times. The Annual Program and Growth Incentive Pool are described in further detail below.

2018 Annual Program

The financial measures used to assess corporate performance were pre-tax income and adjusted operating margin, each weighted equally. Pursuant to the terms of the Annual Program, each performance goal is measured independently of the other performance goal, and payouts are determined based on the weighted average result of the performance goals, with a potential payout ranging from 0% to 200% of the participant’s target opportunity. The Committee believes that the 2018 Annual Program performance metrics were meaningful measures of 2018 performance because these metrics increase the focus of participants on profitability and are tied to our strategy with respect to shareholder value creation.

The Committee established the payout formula for performance objectives to encourage strong, focused performance. Given the economic and market conditions at the time the targets were set, the target payout level was designed to be achievable with strong management performance, while payout at the maximum level was designed to be very difficult to achieve. The 2018 Annual Program goals were set at levels consistent with the Company’s Board-approved budget and strategic operating plan. At the time the 2018 Annual Program performance metrics and requisite performance levels were established, the Committee believed that they were robust and would require a significant amount of effort by the named executive officers.

32

The table below indicates the financial performance metrics and potential payouts with respect to the Company’s achievement of the 2018 Annual Program goals.

The table below indicates the award opportunities established by the Committee and the cash payout under the Annual Program applicable to the named executive officers. The Committee determined the target payout level for each of the named executive officers included in the table based on each named executive officer’s position within the Company, each named executive officer’s historical pay levels, the incentive pay for executives at companies in our compensation peer group, the general industry compensation surveys and the recommendations of Pearl Meyer. The Committee did not change the target award opportunities compared to the 2017 target award opportunities for the named executive officers, except with respect to Mr. Marshall whose target award opportunity was increased from 150% of his base salary to 175% of his base salary and Mr. Sheldon whose target award opportunity was increased from 95% of his base salary to 100% of his base salary. These target award opportunity adjustments were made in order to further align the compensation of Messrs. Marshall and Sheldon with the competitive market data and internal pay equity considerations.

Growth Incentive Pool

As noted above, in 2018 the Committee established the Growth Incentive Pool, the size of which was dependent on pre-tax income growth over 2017. The Committee approved the Growth Incentive Pool in order to recognize and incentivize the efforts to be taken to reach internal pre-tax income growth targets and to further align the interests of the participants with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. For purposes of the Growth Incentive Pool, pre-tax income was calculated in the same manner as described above with respect to the 2018 Annual Program. The Committee allocated 2% of pre-tax income growth as compared to 2017 to the Growth Incentive Pool, with the allocation for each named executive officer as follows:

33

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In order to provide management with incentives to achieve our long-term goals, the Committee continued its prior practice of granting equity awards under a long-term incentive program, or LTI Program. During 2018, each named executive officer was granted an aggregate award opportunity in the form of share-settled performance-based awards under the LTI Program for the 2018-2020 performance period. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the 2018-2020, 2017-2019 and 2016-2018 performance periods were outstanding under the LTI Program. The Committee designed the LTI Program to have overlapping performance periods to address the cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry. These overlapping performance periods provide the Committee with the flexibility to address circumstances within our industry as well as the general economic and market conditions at the time the targets are set.

2018-2020 LTI Program

In 2018, the Committee approved performance-based awards for the 2018-2020 LTI Program that vest based on (i) the Company’s TSR performance relative to the TSR of the Company’s compensation peer group, (ii) the Company’s ROIC performance and (iii) the Company’s adjusted operating margin performance, with each goal weighted equally. These performance measures were deemed by the Committee to be effective long-term measures of performance reflective of our success in executing on our long-term business plan and aligning the executives’ interests with the interests of shareholders.

The Compensation Committee utilized adjusted operating margin as an element in both the Company’s Annual Program and 2018-2020 LTI Program in recognition that this measure is viewed as a core driver of the Company’s performance and shareholder value creation. In designing the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee supplemented the use of adjusted operating margin with additional performance measures in order to strike an appropriate balance with respect to incentivizing top-line growth, profitability and shareholder returns over both the short-term and long-term horizons.

For purposes of the 2018-2020 LTI Program, the Company is required to achieve a TSR equal to the 75th percentile of the 2018 compensation peer group over the three-year performance period in order to earn target vesting, with no payout for bottom quartile performance. The Committee established the payout formula for the ROIC and adjusted operating margin performance objectives to encourage strong, focused performance. Given the economic and market conditions at the time the targets were set, the target payout levels were designed to be achievable with strong performance, while payouts at the maximum performance levels were designed to be very difficult to achieve. Under the 2018-2020 LTI Program, ROIC and adjusted operating margin are defined as follows:

The table below shows the award opportunities established by the Committee relating to the 2018-2020 LTI Program. The award opportunities under the 2018-2020 LTI Program did not change as compared to 2017 for the named executive officers other than Messrs. Marshall and O’Shaughnessy. For the 2018-2020 LTI Program, Mr. Marshall’s target award opportunity increased from $1,625,000 to $2,300,000 and Mr. O’Shaughnessy’s target award opportunity increased from $800,000 to $825,000 to further align their compensation levels with the competitive market data and, in the case of Mr. Marshall in particular, in recognition of his and the Company’s strong performance in 2017.

Actual settlement of the awards will be determined after the end of the three-year performance period based on the Company’s relative TSR, ROIC and adjusted operating margin performance during that time. Under the award agreements, the 2018-2020 LTI Program awards will be settled in Company common shares, except that the award will be settled in any combination of Company common shares and cash if (i) the fair market value of a Company common share is less than $5.00 on December 31, 2020 (or the date of termination of employment due to death or disability) or

34

(ii) the Company does not have a sufficient number of available shares under the Company’s stock incentive plan in effect at the time of the settlement of the award.

Award Opportunity Under 2018-2020 LTI Program

Outstanding Performance Based Equity Awards

The 2017-2019 LTI Program remains outstanding and will be settled following the completion of the three-year performance period, based on (i) the Company’s TSR performance relative to the TSR of the Company’s 2017 compensation peer group (excluding CalAtlantic Group, which was subsequently acquired by Lennar Corporation), (ii) the Company’s ROIC performance, and (iii) the Company’s adjusted operating margin performance, with each goal weighted equally.

During 2018, the 2016-2018 LTI Program concluded, and for each of the participating named executive officers, the vesting level under the 2016-2018 LTI Program was entirely based on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the TSR of the Company’s 2016 compensation peer group.

With respect to the TSR metric under the 2016-2018 LTI Program, the Company was required to achieve a TSR equal to the 75th percentile of the 2016 TSR comparator group over the three-year performance period in order to earn target vesting, with 25th percentile relative TSR performance resulting in threshold vesting. In order to achieve the maximum vesting, the Company was required to be at least second in the TSR comparator group based on TSR performance. For purposes of assessing performance, the 2016 TSR comparator group consisted of the same companies that were included in the 2016 compensation group, excluding CalAtlantic Group due to its 2018 acquisition by Lennar Corporation.

For the 2016-2018 performance cycle, our relative TSR ranked 4th out of the twelve companies included in the TSR comparator group and resulted in an achievement level of 100%.

In 2017, the Company granted Mr. Schlageter a performance award that is eligible to vest over a five-year period commencing on January 1, 2018, subject to the Company’s achievement of certain performance goals over that period relating to adjusted gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses, and operating margin. Under the terms of the award, Mr. Schlageter must remain employed through the second anniversary of the grant date in order to vest in any portion of the award, subject to accelerated vesting in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment. During 2018, the Company achieved the performance goal related to adjusted operating margin, which had a target objective of 14.25% as compared to the Company’s actual performance of 14.33%. This portion of the award will vest on January 1, 2020, subject to Mr. Schlageter’s continued employment through the vesting date.

Equity Grants

In addition to the long-term incentive opportunities granted under the Company’s LTI Program, we make annual grants of service-based equity to named executive officers as a means of furthering the linkage between an executive’s long-term incentive compensation and shareholder value. We seek to provide a significant portion of total compensation to named executive officers in the form of equity compensation. We believe that equity awards:

Our philosophy is to award equity grants to our named executive officers in amounts that reflect market data, the participant’s position, the participant’s ability to influence our overall performance, and individual performance based on a

35

review of results during the prior year against pre-determined objectives such as operational efficiency, employee engagement, and retention and development of key talent. In addition, the Committee considers historical grant practices and market compensation levels in determining grants for individual executives.

The Committee believes that the annual equity grants to the named executive officers should be determined after a review of the Company’s financial statements for a full year. As a result, all annual equity awards are expected to be granted on the date of the regular Board meeting to be held in February of the following year.

In determining the annual equity grants for 2018 performance (which were granted in February 2019), the Committee considered the following: (i) the Company’s historical year-over-year compensation practices, including historical grant levels; (ii) total compensation earned by the named executive officers; (iii) a peer group analysis conducted by Pearl Meyer of the compensation of executive officers holding comparable positions at the companies within the compensation peer group; and (iv) the Company’s objective to provide greater incentive based on long-term Company performance.

As set forth in the table below for the named executive officers, in February 2019, the Committee granted the following awards in recognition of such named executive officer’s performance in 2018. The value of these awards is excluded from the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, which reflects the value of the equity awards granted in 2018 in recognition of the named executive officers’ performance in 2017. The February 2019 grant levels remained generally consistent with the February 2018 grant levels except with respect to Mr. Marshall whose grant level increased based on performance and to more closely align his compensation with market data.

Other Compensation Elements and Practices

Executive Severance Policy

The Committee has adopted the PulteGroup, Inc. Executive Severance Policy, which provides for severance benefits ranging from one times base salary to two times base salary, depending on the length of service with the Company and the executive’s position at the time of a qualifying termination of employment. The Committee also has adopted the PulteGroup, Inc. Retirement Policy, which establishes administrative guidelines for the treatment of outstanding equity and long-term incentive awards following an employee’s qualifying retirement. The Committee believes that these policies help us accomplish our compensation philosophy of attracting and retaining exemplary talent and reduce the need to negotiate individual severance arrangements with new and departing executives.

While these policies reduce the need to negotiate individual severance provisions, the Committee recognizes that under certain circumstances individual severance arrangements may be desirable or beneficial to the Company. Pursuant to the Company’s Executive Severance Policy, the Company is prohibited from entering into a severance agreement with a senior executive of the Company without shareholder approval if such agreement would provide for specified benefits exceeding 2.99 times the sum of (a) the senior executive’s annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to termination of employment and (b) the senior executive’s target annual bonus in the fiscal year in which the termination of employment occurs. Benefits excluded from this policy are (i) the value of any accelerated vesting of any outstanding equity-based award provided under plans, programs or arrangements of the Company applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to the Company’s senior executives, (ii) a pro-rata portion of the value of any accelerated vesting of any outstanding long-term cash-based incentive award provided under plans, programs or arrangements of the Company applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to the Company’s senior executives, (iii) compensation and benefits for services rendered through the date of termination of employment, (iv) any post-termination retirement and other benefits, special benefits or perquisites provided under plans, programs or arrangements

36

of the Company applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to the Company’s senior executives and (v) payments that are required by the Company’s By-laws regarding indemnification and/or a settlement of any claim made against the Company. The policy is available for viewing on our website at www.pultegroup.com.

Benefits

Named executive officers participate in employee benefit plans on the same terms as generally available to all employees. In addition, each of the named executive officers is eligible to participate in our Financial Counseling Reimbursement Plan. The named executive officers, as well as other Company executives, may also participate in the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferral Program, under which they may elect to defer the receipt of their annual incentive cash awards. This plan is discussed further under the section “2018 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.” We do not have a defined benefit pension plan.

Clawback Policy

The Committee has adopted a clawback policy with respect to the Annual Program, Growth Incentive Pool, LTI Program, and equity grants. Under the policy, in the event any named executive officer engages in “detrimental conduct” (as defined in the policy), the Committee may require that such named executive officer (i) reimburse the Company for all or any portion of any bonus, incentive payment, equity-based award, or other compensation received by such named executive officer within the 36 months following such detrimental conduct and (ii) remit to the Company any profits realized from the sale of Company securities within the 36 months following such detrimental conduct.

Prohibition Against Pledging and Hedging of Company Securities

To further enhance the linkage between executives’ long-term incentive compensation and shareholder value, the Company’s insider trading policy prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, with respect to their Company security holdings. Additionally, under the Company’s insider trading policy, directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan, as such arrangements could result under some circumstances in a margin sale or foreclosure sale occurring at a time when the director or executive officer is aware of material nonpublic information or otherwise is not permitted to trade in Company securities. The policy is available for viewing on our website at www.pultegroup.com.

Share Ownership Guidelines

To align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and to assure that our executives own meaningful levels of Company common shares throughout their tenures with the Company, our executive officers are subject to share ownership guidelines adopted by the Committee. The share ownership guidelines require, within a five-year period from date of hire, promotion or determination that a position is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Chief Executive Officer to own Company common shares equal in value to at least six times his base salary and each of the other named executive officers to own Company common shares equal to at least three times their respective base salary. Included in the definition of share ownership are restricted shares and restricted share units, any Company common shares owned outright (including the value of restricted shares that have vested at the higher of the current market price or the share price on the date of vesting), common shares in any Company benefit plan, and the intrinsic value of vested in-the-money stock options. Unvested shares and underwater stock options do not count towards meeting share ownership guidelines. As of the record date, all of the named executive officers have met or, within the applicable period, are expected to meet the share ownership guidelines.

HOW WE MAKE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

The Compensation and Management Development Committee

The Committee establishes our executive compensation philosophies and oversees the development and implementation of our executive compensation program. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Committee. A copy of the charter is available at www.pultegroup.com. In general, the scope of the Committee’s authority is determined by the Board of Directors, or established by formal incentive plan documents. The fundamental responsibilities of the Committee include the following with respect to our senior executives:

37

Information on the Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation are addressed under “Committees of the Board of Directors—Compensation and Management Development Committee” above.

The Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Richard W. Dreiling, Ms. Cheryl W. Grisé, Mr. Scott F. Powers and Mr. William J. Pulte. Mr. Powers currently serves as the Committee Chair. During fiscal year 2018, Mr. O’Leary served on the Committee until the conclusion of his term at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Each current member of the Committee qualifies as an independent director under NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Mr. O’Leary qualified as an independent director under NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines during his term of service.

Independent Compensation Consultant

Pearl Meyer provides independent executive consulting services to the Committee. Pearl Meyer is retained by and reports to the Committee and participates in Committee meetings, as requested by the Committee. Pearl Meyer also:

During 2018, Pearl Meyer did not provide any other services to the Company.

Role of Executive Officers

As noted above, the Committee is responsible for all compensation decisions for our senior executives (which include the named executive officers). During 2018, our then-serving most senior human resources officer worked with the Committee Chair to establish meeting agendas and to determine whether any members of the Company’s management or outside advisors should attend meetings.

Our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each member of senior management (other than his own performance). Recommendations based on these reviews, including salary adjustments, annual bonuses and equity grants, are presented to the Committee. Decisions regarding salary adjustments, annual bonuses and equity grants for the Chief Executive Officer are made by the Committee. All decisions for 2018 made with respect to the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer were made after deliberation with Mr. Marshall.

At various times during the year, at the request of the Committee, Ryan R. Marshall, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; Robert T. O’Shaughnessy, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and Todd N. Sheldon, the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the

38

Company, attended Committee meetings, or portions of Committee meetings, to provide the Committee with information regarding our operational performance, financial performance or other topics requested by the Committee to assist the Committee in making its compensation decisions.

Use of Tally Sheets

The Committee reviews tally sheets, prepared by management and reviewed by Pearl Meyer, which present comprehensive data on the total potential compensation for each of the named executive officers based on various equity grant values and performance levels under our incentive compensation programs. The tally sheets provide the Committee with a framework of potential minimum and maximum compensation levels that each named executive officer may earn under our executive compensation program. While the tally sheets provide a framework for the Committee, they are not determinative of the elements or amounts of compensation paid.

2019 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

At its February 2019 meeting, the Committee took the following actions with respect to 2019 compensation matters:

39

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT

COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Management Development Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Proxy Statement.

40

2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Summary Compensation Table

The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers who served in such capacities as of December 31, 2018 (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

41

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth information concerning award opportunities under our LTI Program and grants under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, as well as estimated possible payouts under the Annual Program.