10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-50976
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
01-0666114
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
550 West Van Buren Street
Chicago, Illinois
60607
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(312) 583-8700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
As of October 30, 2009, approximately 21,313,531 shares of the registrants common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, were outstanding.
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
INDEX
PART I ¾ FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,731 |
|
|
$ |
14,106 |
|
Receivables from clients, net |
|
|
109,129 |
|
|
|
88,071 |
|
Unbilled services, net |
|
|
63,743 |
|
|
|
43,111 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
18,636 |
|
|
|
15,708 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
16,037 |
|
|
|
14,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
234,634 |
|
|
|
179,055 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
42,407 |
|
|
|
44,708 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
40,527 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
17,461 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
24,553 |
|
|
|
32,372 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
401,706 |
|
|
|
505,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
761,288 |
|
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
13,592 |
|
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
31,037 |
|
|
|
27,361 |
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
63,632 |
|
|
|
48,374 |
|
Accrued consideration for business acquisitions |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
60,099 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
18,499 |
|
|
|
21,208 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
131,617 |
|
|
|
166,151 |
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation and other liabilities |
|
|
8,562 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
301,500 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
Deferred lease incentives |
|
|
8,547 |
|
|
|
8,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
318,659 |
|
|
|
294,420 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares
authorized; 22,195,397 and 21,387,679 shares
issued at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 813,643 and 404,357 shares
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
(42,957 |
) |
|
|
(21,443 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
325,266 |
|
|
|
263,485 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
29,459 |
|
|
|
76,731 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
311,012 |
|
|
|
319,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
761,288 |
|
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
1
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Revenues and reimbursable expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
172,228 |
|
|
$ |
168,659 |
|
|
$ |
501,084 |
|
|
$ |
451,461 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
14,652 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
42,038 |
|
|
|
40,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
|
|
186,880 |
|
|
|
185,355 |
|
|
|
543,122 |
|
|
|
492,335 |
|
Direct costs and reimbursable expenses (exclusive
of depreciation and amortization shown in operating
expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs |
|
|
108,813 |
|
|
|
106,310 |
|
|
|
317,117 |
|
|
|
293,650 |
|
Intangible assets amortization |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
14,630 |
|
|
|
16,734 |
|
|
|
42,035 |
|
|
|
40,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct costs and reimbursable expenses |
|
|
124,404 |
|
|
|
126,080 |
|
|
|
362,886 |
|
|
|
337,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
29,737 |
|
|
|
34,435 |
|
|
|
98,389 |
|
|
|
96,377 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
Restatement related expenses |
|
|
13,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
17,304 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Impairment charge on goodwill |
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
156,566 |
|
|
|
43,038 |
|
|
|
237,210 |
|
|
|
115,488 |
|
Other gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(94,090 |
) |
|
|
16,237 |
|
|
|
(54,287 |
) |
|
|
39,191 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
(3,256 |
) |
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
|
|
(9,009 |
) |
|
|
(9,065 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(5,456 |
) |
|
|
(7,813 |
) |
|
|
(9,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(96,321 |
) |
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
(62,100 |
) |
|
|
29,279 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(32,327 |
) |
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
(14,828 |
) |
|
|
22,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(63,994 |
) |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
(47,272 |
) |
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(3.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(2.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(3.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(2.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in calculating
earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,239 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
17,947 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
20,239 |
|
|
|
19,845 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31,
2008 (Restated) |
|
|
20,183,908 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
(21,443 |
) |
|
$ |
263,485 |
|
|
$ |
76,731 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
319,026 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,272 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
Unrealized loss on cash flow
hedging instrument,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,291 |
) |
Issuance of common stock in
connection with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards,
net of cancellations |
|
|
559,034 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(18,351 |
) |
|
|
18,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
93,415 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
Business combination |
|
|
330,222 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,762 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,574 |
|
Shares redeemed for employee
tax withholdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,163 |
) |
Income tax benefit on share-
based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
Capital contributed
by selling shareholders
of acquired businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
21,166,579 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
(42,957 |
) |
|
$ |
325,266 |
|
|
$ |
29,459 |
|
|
$ |
(968 |
) |
|
$ |
311,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(47,272 |
) |
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,038 |
|
|
|
19,852 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
16,574 |
|
|
|
20,421 |
|
Non-cash compensation |
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts and unbilled services |
|
|
3,527 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(40,681 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
Impairment charge on goodwill |
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash gain and other |
|
|
(2,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivables from clients |
|
|
(21,620 |
) |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
Increase in unbilled services |
|
|
(24,167 |
) |
|
|
(29,867 |
) |
Decrease in current income tax receivable / payable, net |
|
|
5,306 |
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
16,246 |
|
|
|
8,805 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
14,943 |
|
|
|
(11,874 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenues |
|
|
(3,879 |
) |
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
51,970 |
|
|
|
44,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
|
|
(10,971 |
) |
|
|
(17,478 |
) |
Net investment in life insurance policies |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(48,370 |
) |
|
|
(227,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(60,765 |
) |
|
|
(246,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Shares redeemed for employee tax withholdings |
|
|
(3,163 |
) |
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
Tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
202,000 |
|
|
|
575,500 |
|
Repayments on credit facility |
|
|
(180,500 |
) |
|
|
(364,000 |
) |
Payments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
21,825 |
|
|
|
213,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12,625 |
|
|
|
11,552 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
14,106 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
26,731 |
|
|
$ |
14,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business combinations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business combination
classified as a liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Description of Business
We are a leading provider of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients in
diverse industries improve performance, comply with complex regulations, resolve disputes, recover
from distress, leverage technology, and stimulate growth. We team with our clients to deliver
sustainable and measurable results. Our clients include a wide variety of both financially sound
and distressed organizations, including leading academic institutions, healthcare organizations,
Fortune 500 companies, medium-sized businesses, and the law firms that represent these various
organizations.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations and
cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The results of
operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 have been restated
as described in note 3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements. These financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect
all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009.
Certain amounts reported in the previous year have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation. Our results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a
full year or any other interim period.
3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q we are restating the following previously-issued financial
statements:
|
|
Our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008; |
|
|
Our consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008;
and |
|
|
Our consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. |
We have also filed the following amendments to restate our previously-issued financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, as well as the three months ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on August 17, 2009, to our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, originally filed on February 24, 2009. |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A, filed with the SEC on August 17, 2009, to our quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, originally filed on April 30, 2009. |
The restatement relates to four businesses that we acquired between 2005 and 2007 (the Acquired
Businesses). Pursuant to the purchase agreements for each of these acquisitions, payments were
made by us to the selling shareholders (1) upon closing of the transaction, (2) in some cases, upon
the Acquired Businesses achieving specific financial performance targets over a number of years
(earn-outs), and (3) in one case, upon the buy-out of an obligation to make earn-out payments.
These payments are collectively referred to as acquisition-related payments.
The acquisition-related payments made by us to the selling shareholders represented purchase
consideration. As such, these payments, to the extent that they exceeded the net of the fair value
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, were properly recorded as goodwill, in
accordance with GAAP. Payments made upon the closing of the acquisition were recorded as goodwill
on the date of closing. Earn-out payments were recorded as purchase consideration resulting in
additional goodwill when the financial performance targets were met by the Acquired Businesses. The
payment made upon the buy-out of an obligation to make earn-out payments was recorded as goodwill
on the date of the buy-out.
It came to the attention of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors that, in connection with
one of these acquisitions, the selling shareholders had an agreement among themselves to reallocate
a portion of their earn-outs to an employee of the Company who was not a selling shareholder.
Following this discovery, the Audit Committee commenced an inquiry into the relevant facts and
circumstances of all of our prior acquisitions to determine if similar situations existed. The
Audit Committee notified the Companys independent auditors who had not previously been aware of
the Shareholder Payments and the Employee Payments (in each case, as defined below).
5
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
This inquiry resulted in the discovery that the selling shareholders of the Acquired Businesses
made one or both of the following types of payments:
1) |
|
The selling shareholders redistributed portions of their acquisition-related payments among
themselves in amounts that were not consistent with their ownership interests on the date we
acquired the business (Shareholder Payments). These Shareholder Payments were dependent, in
part, on continuing employment with the Company or on the achievement of personal performance
measures. |
2) |
|
The selling shareholders redistributed portions of their acquisition-related payments to
certain of our employees who were not selling shareholders of the Acquired Businesses
(Employee Payments). These Employee Payments were dependent on continuing employment with
the Company or on the achievement of personal performance measures. The Company employees who
received the Employee Payments were client-serving and administrative employees of the
respective Acquired Businesses at the date such businesses were acquired by us as well as
similar employees hired by or assigned to the respective Acquired Businesses after the date of
such acquisitions. |
The restatement was necessary because we failed to account for the Shareholder Payments and the
Employee Payments in accordance with GAAP. The selling shareholders were not prohibited from making
the Shareholder Payments or the Employee Payments under the terms of the purchase agreements with
the Company for the acquisitions of the Acquired Businesses. However, under GAAP, including
guidance promulgated by the SEC, actions of economic interest holders in a company may be imputed
to the company itself. The selling shareholders of the Acquired Businesses meet the criteria of
economic interest holders of Huron due to their ability to earn additional consideration from
Huron. As such, when the selling shareholders redistribute acquisition-related payments among
themselves or redistribute a portion of their acquisition-related payments to our employees who
were not selling shareholders based on employment or performance-based criteria, these payments are
viewed as resulting from services that are assumed to have benefited Huron and must therefore be
recorded as non-cash compensation expense incurred by Huron under GAAP. Accordingly, the Employee
Payments and the Shareholder Payments are imputed to us. In the case of the Shareholder Payments,
such payments are imputed to us even when the amounts that are received by the selling shareholders
in the redistribution do not differ significantly from the amounts the selling shareholders would
have received if the portion of the acquisition-related payments redistributed based on performance
or employment had been distributed solely in accordance with the ownership interests of the
applicable selling shareholders on the date we acquired the business. In effect, the Shareholder
Payments and the Employee Payments are in substance a second and separate transaction from our
acquisition of the Acquired Businesses, which should have been recorded as a separate non-cash
accounting entry. Both the Shareholder Payments and the Employee Payments are therefore required to
be reflected as non-cash compensation expense of Huron, and the selling shareholders are deemed to
have made a capital contribution to Huron. The entries are non-cash because the payments were made
directly by the selling shareholders from the acquisition proceeds they received from us. We did
not expend additional cash with respect to the compensation charge.
Based on its inquiry into the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement, which is now
substantially complete, the Audit Committee determined that the Shareholder Payments and Employee
Payments were not properly recorded in our financial statements because senior management did not
properly take into account the impact of the selling shareholders redistribution of the
acquisition-related payments when determining the appropriate accounting treatment. In some cases,
senior management was unaware of the redistributions. In other cases, senior management was aware
of the redistributions but either misunderstood or misapplied the appropriate accounting guidance.
As a result, the facts and circumstances surrounding the Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments
were not fully described in representation letters previously provided to our independent auditors.
In light of these determinations and given the magnitude of the accounting errors underlying the
restatement, our Board of Directors concluded that it was appropriate for the Company to appoint a
new Chairman, a new Chief Executive Officer, a new Chief Financial Officer and a new Chief
Accounting Officer. Our Board of Directors and Gary Holdren, our then Chief Executive Officer,
agreed that he should resign as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. George Massaro,
who was the then Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, was elected as our Non-Executive Chairman
of the Board of Directors. James Roth, one of the founders of the Company, was named Chief
Executive Officer. James Rojas, another founder of the Company, was named Chief Financial Officer,
succeeding Gary Burge who will remain with the Company until the end of 2009. Wayne
Lipski, previously Chief Accounting Officer, left the Company during
the third quarter. On November 3, 2009, James Roth was appointed
to the Board of Directors and James Rojas was appointed Treasurer, in
addition to his current position of Chief Financial Officer. The role of
Chief Accounting Officer has not been filled.
6
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Based on the results of the Companys inquiry into the acquisition-related payments to date
and the agreement amendments described below, earn-outs for the period after August 1, 2009 are
accounted for as additional purchase consideration and not also as non-cash compensation expense.
Effective August 1, 2009, the selling shareholders of two of the Acquired Businesses each amended
certain agreements related to the earn-outs to provide that future earn-outs will be distributed
only to the applicable selling shareholders and only in accordance with their equity interests on
the date we acquired the business with no required continuing
employment. The amended agreements provide that no further
Shareholder Payments or Employee Payments will be made. We recognized $1.2
million of non-cash compensation expense during the third quarter of 2009 related to
Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments for the period July 1
to July 31, 2009, in addition to the $7.1 million previously
recognized for the first six months of 2009. Earn-out
payments for one of the Acquired Businesses are payable through March 31, 2010, and the earn-out
payments for a second Acquired Business are payable through December 31, 2011. There are no
additional earn-out obligations related to the other two Acquired Businesses.
On August 4, 2009, we signed an Acknowledgment and Consent Agreement with respect to our Revolving
Credit and Term Loan Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement). We requested an advance of $6.0
million under the revolving credit facility to fund working capital needs during the interim period
while we restated our financial statements. The lenders agreed to this request subject to a
reservation of rights under the Credit Agreement. This advance, together with collections on our
accounts receivable, provided adequate working capital during the interim period prior to the
restatement of our financial statements.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into an eighth amendment to the Credit Agreement (the Eighth
Amendment to the Credit Agreement) and a security agreement with Bank of America as Administrative
Agent (the Security Agreement), each of which is
described in note 8. Borrowings.
Following entry into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we were in compliance with all
of the applicable debt covenants at September 30, 2009. In addition, based upon projected
operating results, management believes it is probable that we will meet the financial covenants of
the Credit Agreement discussed above, as amended, at future covenant measurement dates.
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 470, Debt (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force
86-30 Classification of Obligations When a Violation is Waived by the Creditor), all amounts not
due within the next twelve months under the amended loan terms have been classified as long-term
liabilities. In the absence of the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we would not have
been in compliance with the then existing debt covenants. See note 8. Borrowings for a
discussion of the Credit Agreement, the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement and the Security
Agreement.
On July 31, 2009, immediately prior to our announcement of our intention to restate our financial
statements, the price of our common stock was $44.35 per share. As of the close of business on
August 3, 2009, the business day next following such announcement, the price of our common stock
was $13.69 per share. As a result of the significant decline in the price of our common stock, we
engaged in an impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection
with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and
recorded a $106.0 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill. This impairment
charge was recognized to reduce the carrying value of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial
Consulting reporting unit ($59.0 million) and our Corporate
Consulting reporting unit ($47.0 million).
The impairment charge is non-cash in nature and does not affect the Companys liquidity. As a
result of the charge recognized during the third quarter, the carrying amount of our goodwill was
reduced to $401.7 million at September 30, 2009. As described in note 8. Borrowings, under the
definition of consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the impairment charge
will be an add back for the period ended September 30, 2009. See
note 6. Goodwill and Intangible
Assets.
The SEC has commenced an investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups.
As often happens in these circumstances, the United States Attorneys Office (USAO) for the
Northern District of Illinois has contacted our counsel. The USAO made a telephonic request for
copies of certain documents that we previously provided to the SEC, which we have voluntarily
provided to the USAO. In addition, several purported shareholder class action complaints and
derivative lawsuits have been filed in connection with the restatement. See note 14. Commitments
and Contingencies for a discussion of the SEC investigations, the USAOs request for certain
documents, and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits.
7
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
As a result of the correction of the accounting errors, which are not tax deductible, related to
the accounting for the acquisition-related payments, we recalculated our provision for income taxes
for each of the quarterly periods using the annual effective income tax rate method in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes). As such, our interim quarterly provision for
income taxes decreased in certain periods and increased in others, with a corresponding change in
income tax receivable or payable. However, there is no change to our provision for income taxes or
our tax accounts on an annual basis. While the correction of these errors significantly reduced our
net income and earnings per share for each of the affected periods, it had no effect on our total
assets, total liabilities, or total stockholders equity on an annual basis. Further, the
correction of these errors had no effect on our net cash flows. The table below summarizes the
impact of the restatement on our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands, except earnings per share).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
Shareholder Payments |
|
$ |
4,708 |
|
|
$ |
19,935 |
|
Employee Payments |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-cash Compensation Expense |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
23,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Consolidated Statement Of Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Direct Costs |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
23,952 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
(1,722 |
) |
Decrease in Net Income |
|
$ |
(6,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,230 |
) |
Decrease in Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
Decrease in Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
Expenses incurred in connection with the restatement totaled $13.0 million and $13.4 million in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Expenses incurred in connection with
the restatement are primarily comprised of legal and accounting fees,
as well as the
settlement costs of an indemnification claim arising in connection with a representation and warranty in
a purchase agreement for a previous acquisition.
The tables below present the effects of the restatement on our previously-issued consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008.
8
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
ments |
|
|
Restated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,106 |
|
Receivables from clients, net |
|
|
88,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,071 |
|
Unbilled services, net |
|
|
43,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,111 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,708 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
14,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
179,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,055 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
44,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,708 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
32,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,372 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
505,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
27,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,361 |
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
48,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,374 |
|
Accrued consideration for business acquisitions |
|
|
60,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,099 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
21,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,208 |
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable
and current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
166,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,151 |
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation and other liabilities |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
Deferred lease incentives |
|
|
8,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
294,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,420 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock; $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(21,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,443 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
211,464 |
|
|
|
52,021 |
|
|
|
263,485 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
128,752 |
|
|
|
(52,021 |
) |
|
|
76,731 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
319,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
779,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
ments |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
ments |
|
|
Restated |
|
Revenues and reimbursable expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
168,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,659 |
|
|
$ |
451,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
451,461 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
40,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
|
|
185,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,355 |
|
|
|
492,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs and reimbursable expenses
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown in operating expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs |
|
|
100,263 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
106,310 |
|
|
|
269,698 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
293,650 |
|
Intangible assets amortization |
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
16,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,734 |
|
|
|
40,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct costs and reimbursable expenses |
|
|
120,033 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
126,080 |
|
|
|
313,704 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
337,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
34,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,435 |
|
|
|
96,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,377 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
43,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,038 |
|
|
|
115,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
22,284 |
|
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
|
|
16,237 |
|
|
|
63,143 |
|
|
|
(23,952 |
) |
|
|
39,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
|
|
(9,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,065 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(5,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,456 |
) |
|
|
(9,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
16,828 |
|
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
53,231 |
|
|
|
(23,952 |
) |
|
|
29,279 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,998 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
24,379 |
|
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
22,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,830 |
|
|
|
(6,392 |
) |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
28,852 |
|
|
|
(22,230 |
) |
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
|
(1.19 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in calculating
earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
17,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,947 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
19,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,845 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
10
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
ments |
|
|
Restated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,852 |
|
|
|
(22,230 |
) |
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,852 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
20,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,421 |
|
Non-cash compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts and unbilled services |
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net
of businesses acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivables from clients |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
Increase in unbilled services |
|
|
(29,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,867 |
) |
Decrease in income tax receivable/payable, net |
|
|
9,181 |
|
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
7,459 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
8,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,805 |
|
Decrease in accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
(11,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,874 |
) |
Increase in deferred revenues |
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
|
|
(17,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,478 |
) |
Net investment in life insurance policies |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(227,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(246,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
Shares redeemed for employee tax withholdings |
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
Tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
575,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,500 |
|
Repayments on credit facility |
|
|
(364,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364,000 |
) |
Payments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
213,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
11,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,552 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
14,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding fair value (formerly
SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
pronouncement does not require any new fair value measurements in financial statements, but
standardizes its definition and guidance in GAAP. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning
on January 1, 2008 for financial assets and financial liabilities, which did not have any impact on
our financial statements. In February 2008, the FASB delayed by one year the effective date of this
pronouncement for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding business combinations
(formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) Business Combinations). This pronouncement, located under
FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, was issued to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of information in financial statements about a business combination
and its effects. This pronouncement retains the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations, but requires a number of changes. The changes that may have the most significant
impact on us include: contingent consideration, such as earn-outs, will be recognized at its fair
value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be
recognized in earnings until settled; acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs will
be expensed as incurred; previously-issued financial information will be revised for subsequent
adjustments made to finalize the purchase price accounting; reversals of valuation allowances
related to acquired deferred tax assets and changes to acquired income tax uncertainties will be
recognized in earnings, except in certain situations. ASC Topic 805 also requires an acquirer to
recognize at fair value, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that
arises from a contingency provided the asset or liabilitys fair value can be determined on the
date of acquisition. We adopted this pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on
January 1, 2009. For business combinations completed on or subsequent to the adoption date, the
application of this pronouncement may have a significant impact on our financial statements, the
magnitude of which will depend on the specific terms and conditions of the transactions.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding noncontrolling interests
and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary (formerly SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51). This pronouncement, located under
FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was issued to improve the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of financial information provided in financial statements by establishing accounting
and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption
of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding derivative and hedging
activities (formerly SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC
Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, was issued to improve transparency of financial information
provided in financial statements by requiring expanded disclosures about an entitys derivative and
hedging activities. This pronouncement requires entities to provide expanded disclosures about: how
and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. We adopted this pronouncement effective
beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our
financial statements as it contains only disclosure requirements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding interim disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments (formerly FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments). This
pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, increases the frequency
of fair value disclosures by requiring both interim and annual disclosures. We adopted this
pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements as it contains only disclosure
requirements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding subsequent events (formerly
SFAS No. 165 Subsequent Events). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 855,
Subsequent Events, was issued to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. This pronouncement requires entities to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial
statements were
issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We adopted this
pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
12
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding authoritative GAAP (formerly
SFAS No. 168 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as
the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB for nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification is nonauthoritative. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on July 1,
2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS
No. 167 was issued to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements.
This statement amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an ongoing
analysis to determine whether the enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. SFAS No. 167 will be effective for us beginning on January 1, 2010. We are
currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this statement may have on our future
financial position, results of operations, earnings per share, and cash flows. SFAS No. 167 has
not yet been codified under FASB ASC Topic 105.
5. Business Combination
Stockamp & Associates, Inc.
In July 2008, we acquired Stockamp & Associates, Inc. (Stockamp), a management consulting firm
specializing in helping high-performing hospitals and health systems optimize their financial and
operational performance. With the acquisition of Stockamp, we expanded our presence in the hospital
consulting market and are better positioned to serve multiple segments of the healthcare industry,
including major health systems, academic medical centers and community hospitals. This acquisition
was consummated on July 8, 2008 and the results of operations of Stockamp have been included within
our Health and Education Consulting segment since that date.
The aggregate purchase price of this acquisition was approximately $230.7 million, consisting of
$168.5 million in cash paid at closing, $50.0 million paid through the issuance of 1,100,740 shares
of our common stock, $1.8 million of transaction costs, $9.6 million of additional purchase price
earned by selling shareholders subsequent to the acquisition, as certain performance targets were
met, and a $0.8 million working capital adjustment. Of the 1,100,740 shares of common stock issued,
330,222 shares with an aggregate value of $15.0 million were deposited into escrow for a period of
one year, beginning on July 8, 2008, to secure certain indemnification obligations of Stockamp and
its shareholders. Since the shares placed in escrow may have had to be returned to us in
satisfaction of indemnification arrangements, they were issued conditionally. As such, the
$15.0 million was classified as a liability and included in accrued consideration for business
acquisitions on our consolidated balance sheet since the acquisition date until the shares were
released as discussed below. The cash portion of the purchase price was financed with borrowings
under the Credit Agreement.
The purchase agreement also provides for the following potential payments:
1. |
|
With respect to the shares
of common stock not placed in escrow, on the date that was six
months and one day after the closing date (the Contingent Payment Date), we were to pay
Stockamp (in cash, shares of common stock, or any combination of cash and common stock, at our
election) the amount, if any, equal to $35.0 million less the value of the common stock issued
on the closing date, based on 95% of the average daily closing price per share of common stock
for the ten consecutive trading days prior to the Contingent Payment Date. No payment needed
to be made if the common stock so valued equaled or exceeded $35.0 million on the Contingent
Payment Date. We were not required to make further payments upon the lapse of the Contingent
Payment Date in January 2009. |
2. |
|
With respect to the shares of common stock placed in escrow, when the shares were released to
Stockamp in July 2009 (the Contingent Escrow Payment Date), we were to pay Stockamp (in
cash, shares of common stock, or any combination of cash and common
stock, at our election) the
amount, if any, equal to $15.0 million (or such pro rata portion thereof, to the extent fewer
than all shares were being released) less the value of the common stock released from escrow
based on 95% of the average daily closing price per share of common stock for the ten
consecutive trading days prior to the Contingent Escrow Payment Date. No payment needed to be
made if the common stock so valued equaled or exceeded $15.0 million on the Contingent Escrow
Payment Date (or the applicable pro rata portion
thereof). Based on the average daily closing price of our common stock for the ten consecutive
trading days prior to the Contingent Escrow Payment Date in July 2009, we made a price
protection payment of $0.2 million to Stockamp. This price protection payment did not change
the purchase consideration. Upon the lapse of the Contingent Escrow Payment Date in July 2009,
the escrow liability balance and price protection payment were recorded to equity. |
13
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
3. |
|
For the period beginning on the closing date and ending on December 31, 2011, additional
purchase consideration may be payable to the selling shareholders if specific financial
performance targets are met. These payments are not contingent upon the continued employment
of the selling shareholders. Such amounts will be recorded as additional purchase
consideration and an adjustment to goodwill. Since the closing date of this acquisition, we
have paid to the selling shareholders $9.6 million as additional purchase consideration. |
The identifiable intangible assets that were acquired totaled $31.1 million and have an estimated
weighted average useful life of 6 years, which consists of customer contracts totaling $5.4 million
(7 months useful life), customer relationships totaling $10.8 million (12.5 years useful life),
software totaling $7.8 million (4 years useful life), non-competition agreements totaling
$3.7 million (6 years useful life), and a tradename valued at $3.4 million (2.5 years useful life).
Customer relationships represent software support and maintenance relationships that are renewable
by the customer on an annual basis. The renewal rate of these relationships has historically been
high and as such, we have assigned a relatively long useful life to these customer relationships.
Additionally, we recorded approximately $196.6 million of goodwill, which we intend to deduct for
income tax purposes.
Purchase Price Allocation
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockamp |
|
|
|
July 8, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
16,857 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
2,176 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
547 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
31,100 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
196,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,253 |
|
Liabilities Assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
16,018 |
|
Current and non-current capital lease obligations |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
$ |
230,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro Forma Financial Data
The following unaudited pro forma financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 give
effect to the acquisition of Stockamp as if it had been completed at the beginning of the period.
The actual results from the acquisition of Stockamp have been included within our consolidated
financial results since July 8, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Revenues, net of reimbursable expenses |
|
$ |
509,661 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
57,880 |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
43,819 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,200 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
The above unaudited pro forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of the results that
would have been achieved if the acquisition had occurred on the date indicated, nor are they
necessarily indicative of future results.
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The table below sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Legal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
341,752 |
|
|
$ |
73,341 |
|
|
$ |
17,456 |
|
|
$ |
73,127 |
|
|
$ |
505,676 |
|
Accumulated impairment
charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional purchase price
subsequently recorded for
business combinations |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,030 |
|
Goodwill reallocation |
|
|
(8,484 |
) |
|
|
8,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross goodwill |
|
|
333,489 |
|
|
|
81,825 |
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
|
|
73,126 |
|
|
|
507,706 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,000 |
) |
|
|
(106,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
333,489 |
|
|
$ |
22,825 |
|
|
$ |
19,266 |
|
|
$ |
26,126 |
|
|
$ |
401,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time, we will reorganize our internal organizational structure to better align our
service offerings. During the third quarter of 2009, we moved our government contract consulting
practice from our Health and Education Consulting segment to our Accounting and Financial
Consulting segment. As a result, $8.5 million of related goodwill was also reallocated between
these segments.
15
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
As a result of the significant decline in the price of our common stock as discussed above in note
3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, we engaged in an impairment analysis
with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection with the preparation of our
financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic
350, we aggregate our business components into reporting units and test for goodwill impairment.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill
impairment test is to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit
with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired
and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting
unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to
measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill,
an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business
combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit
had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the
purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. As a result of the impairment analysis, we
recorded a $106.0 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill. This impairment
charge was recognized to reduce the carrying value of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial
Consulting reporting unit ($59.0 million) and our Corporate Consulting reporting unit ($47.0
million). The impairment charge is non-cash in nature and does not affect the Companys liquidity.
As a result of the charge recognized during the third quarter, the carrying amount of our goodwill
was reduced to $401.7 million at September 30, 2009.
Intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Customer contracts |
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
21,269 |
|
|
|
11,172 |
|
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
8,423 |
|
Non-competition agreements |
|
|
12,473 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
12,473 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Technology and software |
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,817 |
|
|
$ |
26,264 |
|
|
$ |
50,798 |
|
|
$ |
18,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Customer contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over relatively short lives due to the
short-term nature of the services provided under these contracts. The majority of the customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis to correspond to the cash flows expected to be
derived from the relationships. Non-competition agreements, tradenames, and technology and software
are amortized on a straight-line basis.
Intangible assets amortization expense was $2.3 million and $7.8 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Intangible assets amortization expense was
$5.2 million and $8.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Estimated intangible assets amortization expense is $10.2 million for 2009, $7.5 million for 2010,
$5.2 million for 2011, $3.5 million for 2012, $1.8 million for 2013, and $1.1 million for 2014.
Actual future amortization expense could differ from these estimated amounts as a result of future
acquisitions and other factors.
16
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
7. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted common
stock and unvested restricted stock units. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
reduction in earnings per share that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common
stock were exercised or converted into common stock under the treasury stock method. The weighted
average common stock equivalents for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately 120,000 and 500,000, respectively. Due to our loss position for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, these common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation
of diluted earnings per share as the shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect. Earnings per
share under the basic and diluted computations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(63,994 |
) |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
(47,272 |
) |
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
20,239 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
17,947 |
|
Weighted average common stock equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
20,239 |
|
|
|
19,845 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(2.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(2.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were approximately 1,279,100 and 74,100 anti-dilutive securities for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
there were approximately 1,279,100 and 462,500 anti-dilutive securities, respectively.
8. Borrowings
The Credit Agreement consists of a revolving credit facility (Revolver) and a term loan facility
(Term Loan). Fees and interest on borrowings vary based on our total debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. Interest is based on a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or a
spread over the base rate (which is the greater of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or the Prime
Rate), as selected by us.
Prior to the September 30, 2009
Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement discussed below, we
could borrow up to $460.0 million under the Credit Agreement. In
addition, the Credit Agreement had an accordion feature allowing
for an additional amount of up to $60.0 million to be borrowed upon approval from the lenders.
Prior to entry into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreement consisted of
a $240.0 million Revolver and a $220.0 million Term Loan, which was drawn in a single advance of
$220.0 million on July 8, 2008 to fund, in part, our acquisition of Stockamp.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement which amended,
among other items, the following terms:
|
1. |
|
Reduced the maximum amount of principal that may be borrowed under the Revolver
by $60 million from $240 million to $180 million, and eliminated the $60 million
accordion feature that was available under the Credit Agreement. The borrowing capacity
continues to be reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. |
|
|
2. |
|
Increased the LIBOR spread, base rate spread and letters of credit fee by 75
basis points in each case and increased the non-use fee from a range of 30 to 50 basis
points to a flat 50 basis points. |
|
|
3. |
|
Decreased the maximum leverage ratio from 3.00:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 effective
December 31, 2010, lowered the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio from 2.50:1.00 to
2.35:1.00 effective September 30, 2009 and added a financial covenant requiring minimum
net worth to be greater than zero. |
|
|
4. |
|
Modified the definition of consolidated EBITDA by, among other items, allowing
for the add back of non-cash goodwill impairment charges and other acquisition-related
intangible asset impairment charges, non-cash restructuring charges, and non-cash
compensation charges for the periods ending up to and including September 30, 2009.
Beyond September 30, 2009, we are limited on the future add back of non-cash goodwill
and other acquisition-related intangible asset impairment charges up to the lesser of
$30 million or 15% of net worth. |
17
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Also on September 30, 2009, we entered into the Security Agreement with Bank of America as
Administrative Agent. The Security Agreement is required by the terms of the Eighth Amendment to
the Credit Agreement in order to secure the obligations thereunder, and grants Bank of America, for
the ratable benefit of the lenders under the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, a
first-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on substantially all of the personal property
assets of the Company and the subsidiary grantors. Prior to our entry into the Security Agreement,
the Revolver and Term Loan were
secured by a pledge of 100% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our domestic
subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our foreign subsidiaries
(collectively, the Equity Pledge). Following entry into the Security Agreement, the Revolver and
Term Loan are secured by the Equity Pledge and by the first-priority lien, subject to permitted
liens, on substantially all of our personal property assets and those of our subsidiary grantors.
Interest on the Revolver and Term Loan are based on a spread, ranging from 2.25% to 3.25%, as
amended, over LIBOR or a spread, ranging from 1.25% to 2.25%, as amended, over the base rate (which
is the greater of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or the Prime Rate), as selected by us. The Term
Loan is subject to amortization of principal in fifteen consecutive quarterly installments that
began on September 30, 2008, with the first fourteen installments being $5.5 million each. The
fifteenth and final installment will be the amount of the remaining outstanding principal balance
of the Term Loan and will be payable on February 23, 2012, but can be repaid earlier. All
outstanding borrowings under the Revolver will be due upon expiration of the Credit Agreement on
February 23, 2012. The Credit Agreement includes quarterly financial covenants that require us to
maintain certain fixed coverage and total debt to EBITDA ratios as
well as minimum net worth. Under the Credit Agreement,
dividends are restricted to an amount up to 50% of consolidated net income (adjusted for non-cash
share-based compensation expense) for such fiscal year, plus 50% of net cash proceeds during such
fiscal year with respect to any issuance of capital securities. In addition, certain acquisitions
and similar transactions will need to be approved by the lenders.
The borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit
and payments under the Term Loan. At September 30, 2009, outstanding letters of credit totaled
$5.6 million and are used as security deposits for our office facilities. As of September 30, 2009,
the borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement was $65.4 million. Borrowings outstanding under
the credit facility at September 30, 2009 totaled $301.5 million, all of which are classified as
long-term on our consolidated balance sheet as the principal under the Revolver is not due until
2012 and we intend to fund scheduled quarterly payments under the Term Loan with availability under
the Revolver. Following entry into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we were in
compliance with all of the applicable debt covenants at September 30, 2009. In addition, based
upon projected operating results, management believes it is probable that we will meet the
financial covenants of the Credit Agreement discussed above, as amended, at future covenant
measurement dates. Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 470, Debt
(formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 86-30 Classification of Obligations When a
Violation is Waived by the Creditor), all amounts not due within the next twelve months under the
amended loan terms have been classified as long-term liabilities. These borrowings carried a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.9%, including the effect of the interest rate swap described
below in note 10. Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity. Borrowings outstanding at
December 31, 2008 were $280.0 million and carried a weighted-average interest rate of 3.1%. At both
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with our financial debt covenants.
See note 3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements for a discussion of certain
matters related to the Credit Agreement and our borrowings thereunder in light of the restatement.
9. Restructuring Charges
During the third quarter of 2009, we incurred a $2.1 million pre-tax restructuring charge,
consisting of severance payments, related to workforce reductions to balance our employee base with
current revenue expectations, market demand, and areas of focus. At September 30, 2009, the
restructuring reserve balance was $1.5 million, all of which will be paid by December 31, 2009.
During the third quarter of 2008, we incurred a $2.3 million pre-tax restructuring charge,
consisting primarily of severance payments, related to workforce reductions to balance our employee
base with current revenue expectations, market demand, and areas of focus. These reductions in
workforce included the elimination of the operational consulting group within the Corporate
Consulting segment and a reduction in the number of consultants in various other practice groups.
18
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
10. Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity
On March 20, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of
$100.0 million effective on March 31, 2009 and ending on February 23, 2012. We entered into this
derivative instrument to hedge against the risk of changes in future cash flows related to changes
in interest rates on $100.0 million of the total variable-rate borrowings outstanding described
above in note 8. Borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we receive from
the counterparty interest on the $100.0 million notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay
to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.715%. This swap effectively converted $100.0 million of our
variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings beginning on March 31, 2009 and through
February 23, 2012.
FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities), requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as
either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. In accordance with ASC Topic 815,
we have designated this derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge. As such, changes in the fair
value of the derivative instrument are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income
(OCI) to the extent of effectiveness. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative instrument is recognized in interest expense.
The table below sets forth additional information relating to this interest rate swap
designated as a hedging instrument as of September 30, 2009 and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss, Net of Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
(Derivative |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Liability) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Deferred compensation and other liabilities |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
$ |
(377 |
) |
We do not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and we did not have
any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of September 30, 2009.
11.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Goodwill
Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. The carrying
values for receivables from clients, unbilled services, accounts payable, deferred revenues and
other accrued liabilities reasonably approximate fair market value due to the nature of the
financial instrument and the short term maturity of these items.
Certain of our assets and liabilities are measured at fair value. FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS No. 157), defines fair value as the price that would
be received to sell an asset or the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair
value hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value and requires companies to maximize the use
of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy consists
of three levels based on the objectivity of the inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to
access at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar assets
or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other
than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or
other means. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include
situations in which there is little, if any, market
activity for the asset or liability. |
19
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
The
table below sets forth our fair value hierarchy for our derivative
liability and goodwill measured at fair
value as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Asset: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401,706 |
|
|
$ |
401,706 |
|
|
Liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
In
accordance with ASC Topic 350, goodwill with a carrying amount of
$507.7 million was written down to its implied fair value of $401.7
million, resulting in an impairment charge of $106.0 million. See
note 6. Goodwill and Intangible
Assets for a discussion of the impairment charge.
The fair value of the interest rate swap was derived using estimates to settle the interest rate
swap agreement, which is based on the net present value of expected future cash flows on each leg
of the swap utilizing market-based inputs and discount rates reflecting the risks involved.
12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The tables below set forth the components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Before |
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(63,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(316 |
) |
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
cash flow hedging
instrument |
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
$ |
(1,155 |
) |
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
(64,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Before |
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(47,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(418 |
) |
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
cash flow hedging
instrument |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
$ |
(1,053 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(48,291 |
) |
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
13. Other Gain
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a gain of $2.7 million relating to
the release of certain of our employees from their non-solicitation agreements with the Company and
the settlement of certain contractual obligations.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
On July 3, 2007, The Official Committee (the Committee) of Unsecured Creditors of Saint Vincents
Catholic Medical Centers of New York d/b/a Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers (St. Vincents),
et al. filed suit against Huron Consulting Group Inc., certain of our subsidiaries, including
Speltz & Weis LLC, and two of our former managing directors, David E. Speltz (Speltz) and Timothy
C. Weis (Weis), in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. On
November 26, 2007, Gray & Associates, LLC (Gray), in its capacity as trustee on behalf of the
SVCMC Litigation Trust, was substituted as plaintiff in the place of the Committee and on
February 19, 2008, Gray filed an amended complaint in the action. Beginning in 2004, St. Vincents
retained Speltz & Weis LLC to provide management services to St. Vincents, and its two principals,
Speltz and Weis, were made the interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of St. Vincents. In May of 2005, we acquired Speltz & Weis LLC. On July 5, 2005, St.
Vincents filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York (Bankruptcy Court). On December 14, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved the retention of
Speltz & Weis LLC and us in various capacities, including interim management, revenue cycle
management and strategic sourcing services. The amended complaint filed by Gray alleges, among
other things, breach of fiduciary duties, breach of the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law,
malpractice, breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, aiding and abetting breaches
of fiduciary duties, certain fraudulent transfers and fraudulent conveyances, breach of the implied
duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation,
and civil conspiracy, and seeks at least $200 million in damages, disgorgement of fees, return of
funds or other property transferred to Speltz & Weis LLC, attorneys fees, and unspecified punitive
and other damages. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend
ourselves in this matter. The suit is in the pre-trial stage and no trial date has been set.
The SEC has commenced an investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups.
We are cooperating fully with the SEC in its investigations. As often happens in these
circumstances, the USAO for the Northern District of Illinois has contacted our counsel. The USAO
made a telephonic request for copies of certain documents that we previously provided to the SEC,
which we have voluntarily provided to the USAO.
In addition, the following purported shareholder class action complaints have been filed in
connection with our restatement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois: (1) a complaint in the matter of Jason Hughes v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E.
Holdren and Gary L. Burge, filed on August 4, 2009; (2) a complaint in the matter of Dorothy
DeAngelis v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 5, 2009; (3) a complaint in the matter of Noel M.
Parsons v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 5, 2009; (4) a complaint in the matter of Adam Liebman
v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne Lipski, filed on August 5,
2009; (5) a complaint in the matter of Gerald Tobin v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E.
Holdren, Gary L. Burge and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 7, 2009; (6) a complaint in
the matter of Gary Austin v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne
Lipski, filed on August 7, 2009 and (7) a compliant in the matter of Thomas Fisher v. Huron
Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on September 2, 2009. The complaints
assert claims under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and contend that the Company
and the individual defendants issued false and misleading statements regarding the Companys
financial results and compliance with GAAP and seek unspecified damages and reimbursement for fees
and expenses incurred in connection with the action, including attorneys fees. We intend to defend
the actions vigorously.
21
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in two state derivative suits filed in
connection with the Companys restatement, since consolidated in the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois, Chancery Division on September 21, 2009: (1) a complaint in the matter of Curtis Peters,
derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne
Lipski, each of the members of the Board of Directors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on
August 28, 2009 (the Peters suit) and (2) a complaint in the matter of Brian Hacias, derivatively
on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne Lipski, filed on August 28,
2009 (the Hacias suit). A consolidated complaint is forthcoming. The Peters suit was filed in the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Law Division, and alleges claims for breach of fiduciary
duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of corporate assets. The
Peters suit also alleges claims for professional negligence against PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the
Companys independent auditors. The Hacias suit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook
County, Illinois, Chancery Division, and alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, gross
negligence, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, breach of contract, waste of corporate assets,
contribution and indemnification and insider trading. Both plaintiffs seek unspecified damages
allegedly sustained by the Company resulting from the restatement and related matters, disgorgement
and reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in connection with the suits, including attorneys
fees.
The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in three Federal derivative suits filed in
connection with the Companys restatement: (1) a complaint in the matter of Oakland County
Employees Retirement System, derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E.
Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on
October 7, 2009 (the Oakland suit); (2) a complaint in the matter of Philip R. Wilmore,
derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne
Lipski, David M. Shade and each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on October 12, 2009
(the Wilmore suit) and (3) a complaint in the matter of Lawrence J. Goelz, derivatively on behalf
of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski, David M. Shade and
each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on October 12, 2009 (the Goelz suit). The
Oakland suit alleges claims for disgorgement under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross
mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and aiding and abetting breaches of
fiduciary duty. The Oakland plaintiff seeks unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the Company
resulting from the restatement and related matters, restitution from all defendants and
disgorgement of all profits, benefits or other compensation obtained by the defendants and
reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in connection with the suit, including attorneys
fees. Both the Wilmore suit and the Goelz suit allege claims for breach of fiduciary duty and
unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs Wilmore and Goelz seek unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the
Company resulting from the restatement and related matters, disgorgement and reimbursement for fees
and expenses incurred in connection with the suits, including attorneys fees.
Given the uncertain nature of the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to
the restatement and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for
certain documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in
respect of the restatement (collectively, the restatement matters), and the uncertainties related
to the incurrence and amount of loss, including with respect to the imposition of fines, penalties,
damages, administrative remedies and liabilities for additional amounts, with respect to the
restatement matters, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the restatement matters,
determine whether a liability has been incurred or make a reasonable estimate of the liability that
could result from an unfavorable outcome in the restatement matters. Any such liability could be
material.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. As of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we are not a party to or
threatened with any other litigation or legal proceeding that, in the opinion of management, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, due to
the risks and uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings, actual results could differ from current
expected results.
Guarantees
Guarantees in the form of letters of credit totaling $5.6 million and $5.7 million were outstanding
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, to support certain office lease
obligations.
In connection with certain business acquisitions, we are required to pay additional purchase
consideration to the sellers if specific performance targets and conditions are met over a number
of years as specified in the related purchase agreements. These amounts are calculated and payable
at the end of each year based on full year financial results. There is no limitation to the maximum
amount of additional purchase consideration and the aggregate amount that potentially may be paid
could be significant. Based on current and projected financial performance, we anticipate aggregate
additional purchase consideration that will be earned by certain sellers to be approximately
$65.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2009. Additional purchase consideration earned by
certain sellers totaled $46.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
22
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
To the extent permitted by law, our by-laws and articles of incorporation require that we indemnify
our officers and directors against judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement, including
attorneys fees, incurred in connection with civil or criminal action or proceedings, as it relates
to their services to us if such person acted in good faith. Although there is no limit on the
amount of indemnification, we may have recourse against our insurance carrier for certain payments
made.
15. Segment Information
Segments are defined by FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting (formerly SFAS No. 131 -
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information), as components of a company
in which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker manages the business under four operating
segments: Health and Education Consulting, Accounting and Financial Consulting, Legal Consulting,
and Corporate Consulting.
|
|
Health and Education Consulting. This segment provides consulting services to hospitals,
health systems, physicians, managed care organizations, academic medical centers, colleges,
universities, and pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers. This segments
professionals develop and implement solutions to help clients address financial management,
strategy, operational and organizational effectiveness, research administration, and
regulatory compliance. This segment also provides consulting services related to hospital or
healthcare organization performance improvement, revenue cycle improvement, turnarounds,
merger or affiliation strategies, labor productivity, non-labor cost management, information
technology, patient flow improvement, physician practice management, interim management,
clinical quality and medical management, and governance and board development. |
|
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting. This segment assists corporations with complex
accounting and financial reporting matters, financial analysis in business disputes,
international arbitration and litigation, as well as valuation analysis related to business
acquisitions. This segment also consults with management in the areas of internal audit and
corporate tax. Additionally, the Accounting and Financial Consulting segment provides
experienced project leadership and consultants with a variety of financial and accounting
credentials and prior corporate experience on an as-needed basis to assist clients with
finance and accounting projects. This segment is comprised of certified public accountants,
economists, certified fraud examiners, chartered financial analysts and valuation experts who
serve attorneys and corporations as expert witnesses and consultants in connection with
business disputes, as well as in regulatory or internal investigations. |
|
|
Legal Consulting. This segment provides guidance and business services to corporate law
departments and government agencies by helping to reduce legal spending, enhance client
service delivery and increase operational effectiveness. These services include digital
evidence and discovery services, document review, law firm management services, records
management, and strategic and operational improvements. |
|
|
Corporate Consulting. This segment leads clients through various stages of transformation
that result in measurable and sustainable performance improvement. This segment works with
clients to solve complex business problems and implements strategies and solutions to
effectively address and manage stagnant or declining stock price, acquisitions and
divestitures, process inefficiency, third party contracting difficulties, lack of or
misaligned performance measurements, margin and cost pressures, performance issues, bank
defaults, covenant violations, and liquidity issues. This segment also provides restructuring
and turnaround consulting assistance to financially distressed companies, creditor
constituencies, and other stakeholders in connection with out-of-court restructurings and
bankruptcy proceedings. |
Segment operating income consists of the revenues generated by a segment, less the direct costs of
revenue and selling, general and administrative costs that are incurred directly by the segment.
Unallocated corporate costs include costs related to administrative functions that are performed in
a centralized manner that are not attributable to a particular segment. These administrative
function costs include costs for corporate office support, certain office facility costs, costs
relating to accounting and finance, human resources, legal, marketing, information technology and
company-wide business development functions, as well as costs related to overall corporate
management.
From time to time, we will reorganize our internal organizational structure to better align our
service offerings. During the third quarter of 2009, we moved our government contract consulting
practice from our Health and Education Consulting segment to our Accounting and Financial
Consulting segment. Additionally, $8.5 million of goodwill associated with that practice was
reallocated between the two segments. Previously reported segment information has been restated to
reflect this.
23
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
The table below sets forth information about our operating segments for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, along with the items necessary to reconcile the segment
information to the totals reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Health and Education Consulting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
99,714 |
|
|
$ |
76,511 |
|
|
$ |
283,205 |
|
|
$ |
181,001 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
38,676 |
|
|
$ |
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
106,746 |
|
|
$ |
54,894 |
|
Segment operating income as a percent of segment
revenues |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
Accounting and Financial Consulting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
26,809 |
|
|
$ |
35,071 |
|
|
$ |
77,035 |
|
|
$ |
111,965 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
$ |
9,610 |
|
|
$ |
7,910 |
|
|
$ |
18,925 |
|
Segment operating income as a percent of segment
revenues |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Legal Consulting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
29,314 |
|
|
$ |
38,137 |
|
|
$ |
83,423 |
|
|
$ |
93,858 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
|
$ |
15,724 |
|
|
$ |
16,316 |
|
|
$ |
32,387 |
|
Segment operating income as a percent of segment
revenues |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
Corporate Consulting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
16,391 |
|
|
$ |
18,940 |
|
|
$ |
57,421 |
|
|
$ |
64,637 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
5,044 |
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
19,149 |
|
|
$ |
16,295 |
|
Segment operating income as a percent of segment
revenues |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
Total Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
172,228 |
|
|
$ |
168,659 |
|
|
$ |
501,084 |
|
|
$ |
451,461 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
14,652 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
42,038 |
|
|
|
40,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
|
$ |
186,880 |
|
|
$ |
185,355 |
|
|
$ |
543,122 |
|
|
$ |
492,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
51,984 |
|
|
$ |
45,369 |
|
|
$ |
150,121 |
|
|
$ |
122,501 |
|
Charges not allocated at the segment level: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
34,377 |
|
|
|
22,872 |
|
|
|
81,104 |
|
|
|
66,542 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
17,304 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
7,813 |
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
(96,321 |
) |
|
$ |
10,781 |
|
|
$ |
(62,100 |
) |
|
$ |
29,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, one client in our Health and Education Consulting
segment generated $18.4 million, or 10.7%, of our consolidated revenues.
16. Subsequent Event
We have evaluated subsequent events since September 30, 2009 and up to the time of the filing of
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q on November 5, 2009.
On October 29, 2009, we sold a small portion of our Disputes and Investigations practice
specializing in complex accounting matters within our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment.
This portion of the business, which included five managing directors and their related staff, was
based in our Boston office. The sale of this group is not expected to have a material impact on
our results of operations.
24
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Huron,
Company, we, us and our refer to Huron Consulting Group Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the information incorporated by
reference herein, that are not historical in nature, including those concerning the Companys
current expectations about its future results, are forward-looking statements as defined in
Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as may, should, expects, plans,
anticipates, assumes, can, considers, could, intends, might, predicts, seeks,
would, believes, estimates, or continues. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could
impact the Companys forward-looking statements relate, among other things, to (i) the restatement,
(ii) the SEC investigation and related Company inquiries with respect to the circumstances that led
to the restatement and the related private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative
lawsuits, (iii) the SEC investigation and related Company inquiries into the allocation of time in
certain practice groups, (iv) the USAOs request for certain documents, (v) the Companys projected
accounting treatment for acquisition-related payments after August 1, 2009, (vi) the cost reduction
program implemented in the third quarter of 2009 and (vii) managements assessment of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting and any required remediation. In addition, these
forward-looking statements reflect our current expectation about our future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements, including without limitation, that our business continues to
grow at the current expectations with respect to, among other factors, utilization rates, billing
rates and the number of revenue-generating professionals; that we are able to expand our service
offerings; that we successfully integrate the businesses we acquire; and that existing market
conditions, including those in the credit markets, do not continue to deteriorate substantially.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including among
others, those described under Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors, that may cause actual results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. See Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a
description of the material risks we face.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Huron is a leading provider of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients in
diverse industries improve performance, comply with complex regulations, resolve disputes, recover
from distress, leverage technology, and stimulate growth. We team with our clients to deliver
sustainable and measurable results. Many of our highly experienced professionals have masters
degrees in business or healthcare administration, doctorates in economics, are certified public
accountants, or are accredited valuation specialists and forensic accountants. Our professionals
employ their expertise in healthcare administration, accounting, finance, economics and operations
to provide our clients with specialized analyses and customized advice and solutions that are
tailored to address each clients particular challenges and opportunities. We provide consulting
services to a wide variety of both financially sound and distressed organizations, including
leading academic institutions, healthcare organizations, Fortune 500 companies, medium-sized
businesses, and the law firms that represent these various organizations.
We provide our services and manage our business under four operating segments: Health and Education
Consulting, Accounting and Financial Consulting, Legal Consulting, and Corporate Consulting.
|
|
Health and Education Consulting. Our Health and Education Consulting segment provides
consulting services to hospitals, health systems, physicians, managed care organizations,
academic medical centers, colleges, universities, and pharmaceutical and medical device
manufacturers. This segments professionals develop and implement solutions to help clients
address financial management, strategy, operational and organizational effectiveness, research
administration, and regulatory compliance. This segment also provides consulting services
related to hospital or healthcare organization performance improvement, revenue cycle
improvement, turnarounds, merger of affiliation strategies, labor productivity, non-labor cost
management, information technology, patient flow improvement, physician practice management,
interim management, clinical quality and medical management, and governance and board
development. |
|
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting. Our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment assists
corporations with complex accounting and financial reporting matters, financial analysis in
business disputes, international arbitration and litigation, as well as valuation analysis
related to business acquisitions. This segment also consults with clients in the areas of
internal audit and corporate tax. Additionally, the Accounting and Financial Consulting
segment provides experienced project leadership and consultants with a variety of financial
and accounting credentials and prior corporate experience on an as-needed to assist clients
with finance and accounting projects. This segment is comprised of certified public accountants, economists, certified fraud examiners,
chartered financial analysts and valuation experts who serve attorneys and corporations as
expert witnesses and consultants in connection with business disputes, as well as in regulatory
or internal investigations. |
25
|
|
Legal Consulting. Our Legal Consulting segment provides guidance and business services to
address the challenges that confront todays legal organizations. These services add value to
corporate law departments and government agencies by helping to reduce legal spending, enhance
client service delivery, and increase operational effectiveness. This segment provides
measurable results in the areas of digital evidence and discovery services, document review,
law firm management services, records management, and strategic and operational improvements.
Included in this segments offerings is V3locity, a per page fixed price e-discovery service
providing data and document processing, hosting, review and production. |
|
|
Corporate Consulting. Our Corporate Consulting segment leads clients through various stages
of transformation that result in measurable and sustainable performance improvement. This
segment works with clients to solve complex business problems and implements strategies and
solutions to effectively address and manage stagnant or declining stock price, acquisitions
and divestitures, process inefficiency, third party contracting difficulties, lack of or
misaligned performance measurements, margin and cost pressures, performance issues, bank
defaults, covenant violations, and liquidity issues. This segment also provides restructuring
and turnaround consulting assistance to financially distressed companies, creditor
constituencies, and other stakeholders in connection with out-of-court restructurings and
bankruptcy proceedings. |
From time to time, we reorganize our internal organizational structure to better align our
service offerings. During the third quarter of 2009, we moved our government contract consulting
practice from our Health and Education Consulting segment to our Accounting and Financial
Consulting segment.
How We Generate Revenues
A large portion of our revenues is generated by our full-time billable consultants who provide
consulting services to our clients and are billed based on the number of hours worked. A smaller
portion of our revenues is generated by our other professionals, consisting of finance and
accounting consultants, specialized operational consultants, and contract reviewers, all of whom
work variable schedules, as needed by our clients. Other professionals also include our document
review and electronic data discovery groups, as well as full-time employees who provide software
support and maintenance services to our clients. Our document review and electronic data discovery
groups generate revenues primarily based on number of hours worked and units produced, such as
pages reviewed or amount of data processed. We translate the hours that these other professionals
work on client engagements into a full-time equivalent measure that we use to manage our business.
We refer to our full-time billable consultants and other professionals collectively as
revenue-generating professionals.
Revenues generated by our full-time billable consultants are primarily driven by the number of
consultants we employ and their utilization rates, as well as the billing rates we charge our
clients. Revenues generated by our full-time equivalents are largely dependent on the number of
consultants we employ, their hours worked and billing rates charged, as well as the number of pages
reviewed and amount of data processed in the case of our document review and electronic data
discovery groups, respectively.
We generate the majority of our revenues from providing professional services under three types of
billing arrangements: time-and-expense, fixed-fee, and performance-based.
Time-and-expense billing arrangements require the client to pay based on either the number of hours
worked, the number of pages reviewed, or the amount of data processed by our revenue-generating
professionals at agreed upon rates. We recognize revenues under time-and-expense billing
arrangements as the related services are rendered. Time-and-expense engagements represented 47.2%
and 61.7% of our revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
47.7% and 67.5% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In fixed-fee billing arrangements, we agree to a pre-established fee in exchange for a
pre-determined set of professional services. We set the fees based on our estimates of the costs
and timing for completing the engagements. It is the clients expectation in these engagements that
the pre-established fee will not be exceeded except in mutually agreed upon circumstances. We
recognize revenues under fixed-fee billing arrangements using a percentage-of-completion approach,
which is based on our estimate of work completed to-date versus the total services to be provided
under the engagement. For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, fixed-fee engagements
represented 35.1% and 33.5% of our revenues, respectively; while they represented 38.6% and 29.9%
of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase
partly resulted from our acquisition of Stockamp & Associates, Inc. in July 2008, which primarily
has fixed-fee engagements.
26
In performance-based fee billing arrangements, fees are tied to the attainment of contractually
defined objectives. We enter into performance-based engagements in essentially two forms. First, we
have performance-based engagements in which we earn a success fee when and if certain pre-defined
outcomes occur. Second, we generally earn fees that are directly related to the savings formally
acknowledged by the client as a result of adopting our recommendations for improving cost
effectiveness in the procurement area. Often this type of success fee supplements time-and-expense
or fixed-fee engagements. We do not recognize revenues under performance-based billing arrangements
until all related performance criteria are met. Performance-based fee revenues represented 16.4%
and 3.8% of our revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
12.3% and 2.2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recognized a
higher level of performance-based revenues during the first nine months of 2009 upon meeting
performance criteria associated with several Stockamp engagements. Performance-based fee
engagements may cause significant variations in quarterly revenues and operating results due to the
timing of achieving the performance-based criteria.
We also generate revenues from licensing our proprietary software to clients and from providing
related training and support during the term of the consulting engagement. Revenues from software
licenses are recognized ratably over the term of the related consulting services contract.
Thereafter, clients pay an annual fee for software support and maintenance. Annual support and
maintenance fee revenue is recognized ratably over the support period, which is generally one year.
These fees are billed in advance and included in deferred revenues until recognized. Support and
maintenance revenues represented 1.3% and 1.0% of our revenues in the three months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 1.3% and 0.4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
We also bill our clients for reimbursable expenses such as travel and out-of-pocket costs incurred
in connection with engagements. We manage our business on the basis of revenues before reimbursable
expenses. We believe this is the most accurate reflection of our services because it eliminates the
effect of these reimbursable expenses that we bill to our clients at cost.
Our quarterly results are impacted principally by our full-time billable consultants utilization
rate, the number of business days in each quarter and the number of our revenue-generating
professionals who are available to work. Our utilization rate can be negatively affected by
increased hiring because there is generally a transition period for new professionals that results
in a temporary drop in our utilization rate. Our utilization rate can also be affected by seasonal
variations in the demand for our services from our clients. For example, during the third and
fourth quarters of the year, vacations taken by our clients can result in the deferral of activity
on existing and new engagements, which would negatively affect our utilization rate. The number of
business work days is also affected by the number of vacation days taken by our consultants and
holidays in each quarter. We typically have fewer business work days available in the fourth
quarter of the year, which can impact revenues during that period.
Business Strategy, Opportunities and Challenges
Our primary strategy is to meet the needs of our clients by providing a balanced portfolio of
service offerings and capabilities, so that we can adapt quickly and effectively to emerging
opportunities in the marketplace. To achieve this, we have entered into select acquisitions of
complementary businesses and continue to hire highly qualified professionals.
Time-and-expense engagements do not provide us with a high degree of predictability as to
performance in future periods. Unexpected changes in the demand for our services can result in
significant variations in utilization and revenues and present a challenge to optimal hiring and
staffing. Moreover, our clients typically retain us on an engagement-by-engagement basis, rather
than under long-term recurring contracts. The volume of work performed for any particular client
can vary widely from period to period.
To expand our business, we will remain focused on growing our existing relationships and developing
new relationships, continue to promote and provide an integrated approach to service delivery,
broaden the scope of our existing services, and continue to acquire complementary businesses.
Additionally, we intend to enhance our visibility in the marketplace by continuing to build our
brand.
We are
continuously reviewing initiatives to align the cost structure of our segments with the
market for their services. On October 29, 2009, we sold a small portion of our Disputes and
Investigations practice specializing in complex accounting matters within our Accounting and
Financial Consulting segment. This portion of the business, which
included five managing directors
and their related staff, was based in our Boston office. The sale of this group is not expected to
have a material impact on our results of operations.
27
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make assessments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those
policies that we believe present the most complex or subjective measurements and have the most
potential to impact our financial position and operating results. While all decisions regarding
accounting policies are important, we believe that there are four accounting policies that could be
considered critical. These critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, allowances
for doubtful accounts and unbilled services, carrying values of goodwill and other intangible
assets, and valuation of net deferred tax assets. For a detailed discussion of these critical
accounting policies, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2008. Below is an update to our critical accounting policy relating to the
carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets. There have been no material changes to our
other critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2009.
Carrying Values of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the net of the amounts
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Pursuant to the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, formerly known as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards,
or SFAS, No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is required to be tested at the
reporting unit level for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment arise. Pursuant
to our policy, we performed the annual goodwill impairment test as of April 30, 2009 and determined
that no impairment of goodwill existed as of that date. In the third
quarter of 2009, subsequent to our annual goodwill
impairment testing, we reorganized our government contract consulting practice from our Health and
Education Consulting reporting unit to our Accounting and Financial Consulting reporting unit. As a
result, $8.5 million of related goodwill was reallocated between these reporting units.
On July 31, 2009, we announced our intention to restate our financial statements due to the
accounting errors discussed below under Restatement of
Previously-Issued Financial Statements. Immediately prior to
our announcement of our intention to restate our financial statements the price of our common stock was $44.35 per
share. As of the close of business on August 3, 2009, the business day following such announcement,
the price of our common stock was $13.69 per share. As a result of the significant decline in our
stock price, we determined that an event had occurred that may
indicate the carrying value of our goodwill may have been impaired.
Accordingly, we engaged in an
impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our
goodwill, as of August 3, 2009, in connection with the
preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, we aggregate our business components into reporting units
and test for goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The
first step of the goodwill impairment test is to identify potential impairment by comparing the
fair value of a reporting unit with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit
is considered not to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill
impairment test is performed to measure the amount of
the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill,
an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business
combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit
had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the
purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.
28
The SEC has commenced an investigation
with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups.
As often happens in these circumstances, the USAO for the Northern District of Illinois contacted
our counsel and made a telephonic request for copies of certain documents that we previously
provided to the SEC, which we voluntarily provided to the USAO. In addition, several purported
shareholder class action complaints and derivative lawsuits have been filed in connection with our
restatement. See note 14. Commitments and Contingencies in
the notes to consolidated financial statements under
Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial
Statements and Part II Item 1. Legal
Proceedings for a discussion of the SEC Investigations, the
USAOs request for certain documents and the private shareholder
class action and derivative lawsuits. As a result of the uncertain nature of these matters and the effect they may have on
our business as well as the related costs and expenses associated with these matters, and based on
our existing backlog, pipeline of new proposal opportunities, and continuing uncertain market
conditions, we lowered our revenue projections and earnings for the remainder of 2009 and also our
longer-term outlook, and increased the discount rates used in the
goodwill impairment analysis.
Based on the result of the first
step of the goodwill impairment analysis, we determined that the
fair values of our Accounting and Financial Consulting and Corporate Consulting reporting units
were less than their carrying values while the fair values of our Health and Education Consulting
and Legal Consulting reporting units exceeded their carrying values by 32% and 61%, respectively.
As such, we applied the second step of the goodwill impairment test to our Accounting and Financial
Consulting and Corporate Consulting reporting units. Based on the result of the second step of
the goodwill impairment analysis, we determined that the carrying values of the goodwill associated
with these reporting units exceeded their implied fair values, resulting in a $106.0 million
non-cash pretax goodwill impairment charge. This impairment charge was recognized to reduce the
carrying value of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial Consulting reporting unit by $59.0 million
and our Corporate Consulting reporting unit by $47.0 million. As a result of the charge recognized
during the third quarter, the carrying amount of our goodwill was reduced to $401.7 million at
September 30, 2009. As described below under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial
Statements, under the definition of consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement, as amended,
the impairment charge will be an add back for the period ended September 30, 2009
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test
and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit (including
unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test requires our
management to make significant judgments, estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized
and also the magnitude of any such charge.
In estimating the fair value of our reporting units, we considered the income approach, the market
approach and the cost approach. The income approach recognizes that the value of an asset is
premised upon the expected receipt of future economic benefits. This approach involves projecting
the cash flows the asset is expected to generate. Fair value indications are developed in the
income approach by discounting expected future cash flows available to the investor at a rate which
reflects the risk inherent in the investment. The market approach is primarily comprised of the
guideline company and the guideline transaction methods. The guideline company method compares the
subject company to selected reasonably similar companies whose securities are actively traded in
the public markets. The guideline transaction method gives
consideration to the prices paid in recent transactions that have
occurred in the subject companys industry. The cost approach estimates the fair value of an asset based on the current
cost to purchase or replace the asset.
In determining the fair value of our reporting units, we have relied on a combination of the income
approach and the market approach, utilizing the guideline company method, with a fifty-fifty
weighting. For companies providing services, such as us, the income and market approaches will
generally provide the most reliable indications of value because the
value of such companies is more
dependent on their ability to generate earnings than on the value of the assets used in the
production process. We did not utilize the guideline transaction method due to a limited number of
recent transactions and the multiples derived from recent transactions did not provide meaningful
value indications for our reporting units. We also did not use the cost approach because our
reporting units were valued on a going concern basis. The income approach and market approach both
take into account the future earnings potential of our reporting units.
In the income approach, we utilized a discounted cash flow analysis, which involved estimating the
expected after-tax cash flows that will be generated by each of the reporting units and then
discounting these cash flows to present value reflecting the relevant risks associated with the
reporting units and the time value of money. This approach requires the use of significant
estimates and assumptions, including long-term projections of future cash flows, market conditions,
discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, revenue growth, perpetual growth
rates and profitability, among others. In estimating future cash flows for each of our reporting
units, we relied on internally generated six-year forecasts and a three percent long-term assumed
annual revenue growth rate for periods after the six-year forecast. Our forecasts are based on our
historical experience, current backlog, expected market demand, and other industry information. For
our Health and Education Consulting and Legal Consulting reporting units, we used a 15% discount
rate while for our Accounting and Financial Consulting and Corporate Consulting reporting units, we
used a 19% discount rate. We used a lower discount rate for our Health and Education Consulting and
Legal Consulting reporting units due to their strength in the marketplace, as well as current and
forecasted steady growth. In comparison, we used a higher discount rate for our Accounting and
Financial Consulting and Corporate Consulting reporting units because these two reporting units
have recently experienced soft demand and are undergoing restructuring activities. Additionally,
the Accounting and Financial Consulting reporting unit may be more challenged by our financial
restatement due to the type of services that this reporting unit provides.
In the market approach, we utilized the guideline company method, which involved calculating
valuation multiples based on operating data from guideline publicly traded companies. Multiples
derived from guideline companies provide an indication of how much a knowledgeable investor in the
marketplace would be willing to pay for a company. These multiples were then applied to the
operating data for our reporting units and adjusted for factors similar to the discounted cash flow
analysis to arrive at an indication of value.
29
While we believe that our estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are
reasonable, different estimates and assumptions could result in different outcomes. The table below
presents the decrease in the fair value of
each of our reporting units given a one percent increase in the discount rate or a one percent
decrease in the long-term assumed annual revenue growth rate. A 10%
change in the weighting of the income approach and the market
approach would not have had a significant effect on the fair value of
our reporting units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Fair Value of the Reporting Unit |
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Legal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
Discount Rate Increase by 1% |
|
$ |
48,400 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
Long-term Growth Rate Decrease by 1% |
|
$ |
27,400 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
As
described above, a goodwill impairment analysis requires significant judgments,
estimates and assumptions. The results of this impairment analysis are as of a point in time. There is no assurance that the actual future earnings or cash flows of
our reporting units will not decline significantly from our projections. We will monitor any
changes to our assumptions and will evaluate goodwill as deemed warranted during future periods.
Any significant decline in our operations could result in additional goodwill impairment charges.
After taking into account the $106.0 million impairment charge, the carrying values of goodwill for
each of our reporting unit as of September 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Legal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Total |
|
Carrying Value of Goodwill |
|
$ |
333,489 |
|
|
$ |
22,825 |
|
|
$ |
19,266 |
|
|
$ |
26,126 |
|
|
$ |
401,706 |
|
Intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished
from goodwill. Our intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, totaled $24.6 million at
September 30, 2009 and consist of customer contracts, customer relationships, non-competition
agreements, tradenames, as well as technology and software. We use valuation techniques in
estimating the initial fair value of acquired intangible assets. These valuations are primarily
based on the present value of the estimated net cash flows expected to be derived from the client
contracts and relationships, discounted for assumptions such as future customer attrition. We
evaluate our intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Therefore, higher or
earlier-than-expected customer attrition may result in higher future amortization charges or an
impairment charge for customer-related intangible assets.
RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations below for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 has been restated for the acquisition-related payments noted below.
We have also filed an Amendment No. 1 on
Form 10-K/A to our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and an Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009, to restate our financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, as well as the three months ended March 31, 2009. The results of
operations below should be read in conjunction with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A and Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A, as well as our quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.
The restatement relates to four businesses that we acquired between 2005 and 2007 (the Acquired
Businesses). Pursuant to the purchase agreements for each of these acquisitions, payments were
made by us to the selling shareholders (1) upon closing of the transaction, (2) in some cases, upon
the Acquired Businesses achieving specific financial performance targets over a number of years
(earn-outs), and (3) in one case, upon the buy-out of an obligation to make earn-out payments.
These payments are collectively referred to as acquisition-related payments.
The acquisition-related payments made by us to the selling shareholders represented purchase
consideration. As such, these payments, to the extent that they exceeded the net of the fair value
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, were properly recorded as goodwill, in
accordance with GAAP. Payments made upon the closing of the acquisition were recorded as goodwill
on the date of closing. Earn-out payments were recorded as purchase consideration resulting in
additional goodwill when the financial performance targets were met by the Acquired Businesses. The
payment made upon the buy-out of an obligation to make earn-out payments was recorded as goodwill
on the date of the buy-out.
30
It came to the attention of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors that, in connection with
one of these acquisitions, the selling shareholders had an agreement among themselves to reallocate
a portion of their earn-outs to an employee of the Company who was not a selling shareholder.
Following this discovery, the Audit Committee commenced an inquiry into the relevant facts and
circumstances of all of our prior acquisitions to determine if similar situations existed. The
Audit Committee notified the Companys independent auditors who had not previously been aware of
the Shareholder Payments and the Employee Payments (in each case, as defined below).
This inquiry resulted in the discovery that the selling shareholders of the Acquired Businesses
made one or both of the following types of payments:
1) |
|
The selling shareholders redistributed portions of their acquisition-related payments among
themselves in amounts that were not consistent with their ownership interests on the date we
acquired the business (Shareholder Payments). These Shareholder Payments were dependent, in
part, on continuing employment with the Company or on the achievement of personal performance
measures. |
2) |
|
The selling shareholders redistributed portions of their acquisition-related payments to
certain of our employees who were not selling shareholders of the Acquired Businesses
(Employee Payments). These Employee Payments were dependent on continuing employment with
the Company or on the achievement of personal performance measures. The Company employees who
received the Employee Payments were client-serving and administrative employees of the
respective Acquired Businesses at the date such businesses were acquired by us as well as
similar employees hired by or assigned to the respective Acquired Businesses after the date of
such acquisitions. |
The restatement was necessary because we failed to account for the Shareholder Payments and the
Employee Payments in accordance with GAAP. The selling shareholders were not prohibited from
making the Shareholder Payments or the Employee Payments under the terms of the purchase
agreements with the Company for the acquisitions of the Acquired Businesses. However, under
GAAP, including guidance promulgated by the SEC, actions of economic interest holders in a
company may be imputed to the company itself. The selling shareholders of the Acquired
Businesses meet the criteria of economic interest holders of Huron due to their ability to
earn additional consideration from Huron. As such, when the selling shareholders redistribute
acquisition-related payments among themselves or redistribute a portion of their
acquisition-related payments to our employees who were not selling shareholders based on
employment or performance-based criteria, these payments are viewed as resulting from services
that are assumed to have benefited Huron and must therefore be recorded as non-cash
compensation expense incurred by Huron under GAAP. Accordingly, the Employee Payments and the
Shareholder Payments are imputed to us. In the case of the Shareholder Payments, such payments
are imputed to us even when the amounts that are received by the selling shareholders in the
redistribution do not differ significantly from the amounts the selling shareholders would
have received if the portion of the acquisition-related payments redistributed based on
performance or employment had been distributed solely in accordance with the ownership
interests of the applicable selling shareholders on the date we acquired the business. In
effect, the Shareholder Payments and the Employee Payments are in substance a second and
separate transaction from our acquisition of the Acquired Businesses, which should have been
recorded as a separate non-cash accounting entry. Both the Shareholder Payments and the
Employee Payments are therefore required to be reflected as non-cash compensation expense of
Huron, and the selling shareholders are deemed to have made a capital contribution to Huron.
The entries are non-cash because the payments were made directly by the selling shareholders
from the acquisition proceeds they received from us. We did not expend additional cash with
respect to the compensation charge.
Based on its inquiry into the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement, which is now
substantially complete, the Audit Committee determined that the Shareholder Payments and Employee
Payments were not properly recorded in our financial statements because senior management did not
properly take into account the impact of the selling shareholders redistribution of the
acquisition-related payments when determining the appropriate accounting treatment. In some cases,
senior management was unaware of the redistributions. In other cases, senior management was aware
of the redistributions but either misunderstood or misapplied the appropriate accounting guidance.
As a result, the facts and circumstances surrounding the Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments
were not fully described in representation letters previously provided to our independent auditors.
31
In light of these determinations and given the magnitude of the accounting errors underlying the
restatement, our Board of Directors concluded that it was appropriate for the Company to appoint a
new Chairman, a new Chief Executive Officer, a new Chief Financial Officer and a new Chief
Accounting Officer. Our Board of Directors and Gary Holdren, our then Chief Executive Officer,
agreed that he should resign as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. George Massaro,
who was the then Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, was elected as our Non-Executive Chairman
of the Board of Directors. James Roth, one of the founders of the Company, was named Chief
Executive Officer. James Rojas, another founder of the Company, was named Chief Financial Officer,
succeeding Gary Burge who will remain with the Company until the end of
2009. Wayne Lipski, previously Chief Accounting Officer, left the Company
during the third quarter. The role of Chief Accounting Officer has not been filled. On November 3, 2009, James Roth
was appointed to the Board of Directors and James Rojas was appointed
Treasurer, in addition to his current position of Chief Financial
Officer. As discussed
above, only a portion of the acquisition-related payments to selling shareholders was redistributed
among themselves based on performance or employment while the balance was distributed in accordance
with their ownership interests on the date we acquired the business. The total amounts of the
acquisition-related payments received by the selling shareholders after the redistribution did not
differ significantly from the amounts such selling shareholders would have received if the
distribution of such portion of the acquisition-related payments had been made in proportion to
their respective ownership interests. Under GAAP, however, we are required to recognize as non-cash
compensation expense the entire amount of the acquisition-related payment that was subject to
redistribution based on performance or employment and not merely the difference between the amount
a selling shareholder received following such redistribution and the amount such selling
shareholder would have received if such portion had been distributed in accordance with his
ownership interests.
Based on the results of the Companys inquiry into the acquisition-related payments to date and the
agreement amendments described below, earn-outs for the period after August 1, 2009 are accounted
for as additional purchase consideration and not also as non-cash compensation expense. Effective
August 1, 2009, the selling shareholders of two of the Acquired Businesses each amended certain
agreements related to the earn-outs to provide that future earn-outs will be distributed only to
the applicable selling shareholders and only in accordance with their equity interests on the date
we acquired the business with no required continuing employment. The
amended agreements provide that no further Shareholder
Payments or Employee Payments will be made. We recognized
$1.2 million of non-cash compensation expense during the third quarter of 2009 related to Shareholder Payments and
Employee Payments for the period July 1 to
July 31, 2009, in addition to the $7.1 million previously
recognized for the first six months of 2009. We expect to incur a moderate increase in
cash compensation expense in future periods related to Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments
for such periods, which we currently estimate to be no more than $4 million in each of 2009, 2010
and 2011. The earn-out payments for one of the Acquired Businesses are payable through March 31,
2010, and the earn-out payments for a second Acquired Business are payable through December 31,
2011. There are no additional earn-out obligations related to the other two Acquired Businesses.
Additionally, as a result of the impact that our restatement may have on our business, we expect to
incur a moderate increase in cash compensation expense to retain our top-performing employees. We
also expect an increase in operating expenses, including legal fees, as a result of the Companys
inquiries into the acquisition-related payments and the allocation of time in certain practice
groups, the restatement, the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for certain
documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in respect of
the restatement.
As a result of the correction of these accounting errors, which are not tax deductible, we
recalculated our provision for income taxes for each of the quarterly periods using the annual
effective income tax rate method in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes, formerly
known as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. As such, our interim quarterly provision for income taxes decreased in certain periods and
increased in others, with a corresponding change in income tax receivable or payable. However,
there is no change to our provision for income taxes or our tax accounts on an annual basis. While
the correction of these errors significantly reduced our net income and earnings per share for each
of the affected periods, it had no effect on our total assets, total liabilities, or total
stockholders equity on an annual basis. Further, the correction of these errors had no effect on
our net cash flows. The table below summarizes the impact of the restatement on our consolidated
statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands, except
earnings per share).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
Shareholder Payments |
|
$ |
4,708 |
|
|
$ |
19,935 |
|
Employee Payments |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-cash Compensation Expense |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
23,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Consolidated Statement Of Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Direct Costs |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
23,952 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
(1,722 |
) |
Decrease in Net Income |
|
$ |
(6,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,230 |
) |
Decrease in Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
Decrease in Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
32
On August 4, 2009, we signed an Acknowledgment and Consent Agreement with respect to the Credit
Agreement. We requested an advance of $6.0 million under the revolving credit facility to fund
working capital needs during the interim period while we restated our financial statements. The
lenders agreed to this request subject to a reservation of rights under
the Credit Agreement. This advance, together with collections on our accounts receivable, provided
adequate working capital during the interim period prior to the restatement of our financial
statements.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement which amended,
among other items, the following terms:
|
1. |
|
Reduced the maximum amount of principal that may be borrowed under the Revolver
by $60 million from $240 million to $180 million, and eliminated the $60 million
accordion feature that was available under the Credit Agreement. The borrowing capacity
continues to be reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. |
|
2. |
|
Increased the LIBOR spread, base rate spread and letters of credit fee by 75
basis points in each case and increased the non-use fee from a range of 30 to 50 basis
points to a flat 50 basis points. |
|
3. |
|
Decreased the maximum leverage ratio from 3.00:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 effective
December 31, 2010, lowered the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio from 2.50:1.00 to
2.35:1.00 effective September 30, 2009 and added a financial covenant requiring minimum
net worth to be greater than zero. |
|
4. |
|
Modified the definition of consolidated EBITDA by, among other items, allowing
for the add back of non-cash goodwill impairment charges and other acquisition-related
intangible asset impairment charges, non-cash restructuring charges, and non-cash
compensation charges for the periods ending up to and including September 30, 2009.
Beyond September 30, 2009, we are limited on the future add back of non-cash goodwill
and other acquisition-related intangible asset impairment charges up to the lesser of
$30 million or 15% of net worth. |
Following entry into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we were in compliance with all
of the applicable debt covenants at September 30, 2009. In addition, based upon projected
operating results, management believes it is probable that we will meet the financial covenants of
the Credit Agreement, as amended, at future covenant measurement dates. Accordingly, in
accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 470, Debt (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue No. 86-30 Classification of Obligations When a Violation is Waived by the Creditor), all
amounts not due within the next twelve months under the amended loan terms have been classified as
long-term liabilities. In the absence of the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we would not
have been in compliance with the then-existing debt covenants. A discussion of the risks and
uncertainties relating to the Credit Agreement and our ability to borrow funds under the Credit
Agreement is set forth under the heading Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
Also on September 30, 2009, we entered into the Security Agreement with Bank of America as
Administrative Agent. The Security Agreement is required by the terms of the Eighth Amendment to
the Credit Agreement in order to secure the obligations thereunder, and grants Bank of America, for
the ratable benefit of the lenders under the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, a
first-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on substantially all of the personal property
assets of the Company and the subsidiary grantors. A discussion of the risks relating to the
Security Agreement is set forth in Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors.
On July 31, 2009, immediately prior to our announcement of our intention to restate our financial
statements, the price of our common stock was $44.35 per share. As of the close of business on
August 3, 2009, the business day next following such announcement, the price of our common stock
was $13.69 per share. As a result of the significant decline in the price of our common stock, we
engaged in an impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection
with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and
recorded a $106.0 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill. This impairment
charge was recognized to reduce the carrying value of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial
Consulting reporting unit ($59.0 million) and our Corporate Consulting reporting unit ($47.0
million). The impairment charge is non-cash in nature and does not affect the Companys liquidity.
As a result of the charge recognized during the third quarter, the carrying amount of our goodwill
was reduced to $401.7 million at September 30, 2009. As described above, under the definition of
consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the impairment charge will be an add
back for the period ended September 30, 2009. See note 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets in the
notes to consolidated financial statements under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial
Statements.
33
The SEC has commenced an investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups. We
also conducted a separate inquiry, in response to the initial inquiry from the SEC, into the
allocation of time in certain practice groups. This matter had no impact on billings to
our clients, but could have impacted the timing of when revenue was recognized. Based on our
internal inquiry, which is complete, we have concluded that an adjustment to our historical
financial statements is not required with respect to this matter. The SEC investigation with
respect to the allocation of time in certain practice groups is ongoing. We are cooperating with
the SEC in its investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to the restatement and the
allocation of time in certain practice groups. As often happens in these circumstances, the USAO
for the Northern District of Illinois has contacted our counsel. The USAO made a telephonic request
for copies of certain documents that we previously provided to the SEC, which we have voluntarily
provided to the USAO. In addition, several purported shareholder class action complaints have been
filed in connection with our restatement in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, which assert claims under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and contend that the Company and the individual defendants
issued false and misleading statements regarding the Companys financial results and compliance
with GAAP and seek unspecified damages and reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the action, including attorneys fees. We intend to defend the actions vigorously.
The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in two state derivative suits and three
Federal derivative suits filed in connection with the restatement.
See note 14. Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to consolidated financial statements under
Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements and Part II Item 1. Legal Proceedings for
a description of these private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits.
Given the uncertain nature of the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to
the restatement and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for
certain documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in
respect of the restatement (collectively, the restatement matters), and the uncertainties related
to the incurrence and amount of loss, including with respect to the imposition of fines, penalties,
damages, administrative remedies and liabilities for additional amounts, with respect to the
restatement matters, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the restatement matters,
determine whether a liability has been incurred or make a reasonable estimate of the liability that
could result from an unfavorable outcome in the restatement matters. Any such liability could be
material. See Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors and Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for a discussion of certain risks and uncertainties relating to the restatement matters
and certain other risks and uncertainties that are heightened by the restatement matters.
34
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The tables below summarize the impact of the restatement on segment operating income and segment
operating margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands). The
restatement had no impact on segment revenues and consolidated revenues. From time to time, we
will reorganize our internal organizational structure to better align our service offerings.
During the third quarter of 2009, we moved our government contract consulting practice from our
Health and Education Consulting segment to our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment.
Previously reported segment information has been restated to reflect this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Education |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Legal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before
reimbursable(1) |
|
$ |
76,511 |
|
|
$ |
35,071 |
|
|
$ |
38,137 |
|
|
$ |
18,940 |
|
|
$ |
168,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income(1) |
|
$ |
21,950 |
|
|
$ |
10,423 |
|
|
$ |
15,724 |
|
|
$ |
3,319 |
|
|
$ |
51,416 |
|
Adjustments(2) |
|
|
(4,228 |
) |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income As restated |
|
$ |
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
9,610 |
|
|
$ |
15,724 |
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
45,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin(1) |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments(2) |
|
|
(5.5 |
%) |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin As restated |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before
reimbursable(1) |
|
$ |
181,001 |
|
|
$ |
111,965 |
|
|
$ |
93,858 |
|
|
$ |
64,637 |
|
|
$ |
451,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income(1) |
|
$ |
65,086 |
|
|
$ |
29,667 |
|
|
$ |
32,387 |
|
|
$ |
19,313 |
|
|
$ |
146,453 |
|
Adjustments(2) |
|
|
(10,192 |
) |
|
|
(10,742 |
) |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(3,018 |
) |
|
|
(23,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income As restated |
|
$ |
54,894 |
|
|
$ |
18,925 |
|
|
$ |
32,387 |
|
|
$ |
16,295 |
|
|
$ |
122,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin(1) |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments(2) |
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
(9.5 |
%) |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin As restated |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Reflects the restatement of our government contract consulting practice from our Health and
Education Consulting segment to our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment in conjunction
with an internal reorganization. |
|
2) |
|
Consists of non-cash compensation expense representing Shareholder Payments and Employee
Payments described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements. |
35
The table below sets forth selected segment and consolidated operating results and other operating
data for the periods indicated. Segment operating income consists of the revenues generated by a
segment, less the direct costs of revenue and selling, general and administrative costs that are
incurred directly by the segment. Unallocated costs include corporate costs related to
administrative functions that are performed in a centralized manner that are not attributable to a
particular segment, as well as the goodwill impairment charge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Segment and Consolidated Operating Results |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands): |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
Revenues and reimbursable expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
$ |
99,714 |
|
|
$ |
76,511 |
|
|
$ |
283,205 |
|
|
$ |
181,001 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
26,809 |
|
|
|
35,071 |
|
|
|
77,035 |
|
|
|
111,965 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
|
29,314 |
|
|
|
38,137 |
|
|
|
83,423 |
|
|
|
93,858 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
57,421 |
|
|
|
64,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
172,228 |
|
|
|
168,659 |
|
|
|
501,084 |
|
|
|
451,461 |
|
Total reimbursable expenses |
|
|
14,652 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
42,038 |
|
|
|
40,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
|
$ |
186,880 |
|
|
$ |
185,355 |
|
|
$ |
543,122 |
|
|
$ |
492,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
$ |
38,676 |
|
|
$ |
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
106,746 |
|
|
$ |
54,894 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
9,610 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
18,925 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
15,724 |
|
|
|
16,316 |
|
|
|
32,387 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
|
|
16,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
51,984 |
|
|
|
45,369 |
|
|
|
150,121 |
|
|
|
122,501 |
|
Operating expenses not allocated to segments |
|
|
146,074 |
|
|
|
29,132 |
|
|
|
204,408 |
|
|
|
83,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating income |
|
$ |
(94,090 |
) |
|
$ |
16,237 |
|
|
$ |
(54,287 |
) |
|
$ |
39,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
full-time billable consultants
(at period end) (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Consulting |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of full-time billable consultants
(for the period) (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
Full-time billable consultant utilization rate (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
76.1 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
Legal Consulting |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
62.0 |
% |
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
|
69.3 |
% |
|
|
62.5 |
% |
Total |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
69.7 |
% |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
Full-time
billable consultant average billing
rate per hour (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Segment and Consolidated Operating Results |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands): |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue
per full-time billable consultant (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Other Operating Data: |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Average number of full-time equivalents
(for the period) (4): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
Revenue per full-time equivalents
(in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Education Consulting |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
Accounting and Financial Consulting |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
Legal Consulting |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
Corporate Consulting |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of our full-time professionals who provide consulting services and generate revenues
based on the number of hours worked. |
|
(2) |
|
Utilization rate for our full-time billable consultants is calculated by dividing the number
of hours all our full-time billable consultants worked on client assignments during a period
by the total available working hours for all of these consultants during the same period,
assuming a forty-hour work week, less paid holidays and vacation days. |
|
(3) |
|
Average billing rate per hour for our full-time billable consultants is calculated by
dividing revenues for a period by the number of hours worked on client assignments during the
same period. |
|
(4) |
|
Full-time equivalents consists of consultants who work variable schedules as needed by our
clients, as well as contract reviewers and other professionals who generate revenues primarily
based on number of hours worked and units produced, such as pages reviewed and data processed.
Also includes full-time employees who provide software support and maintenance services to our
clients. |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Revenues
Revenues increased $3.5 million, or 2.1%, to $172.2 million for the third quarter of 2009 from
$168.7 million for the third quarter of 2008.
Of the overall $3.5 million increase in revenues, $10.7 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants, partially offset by a $7.2 million decrease attributable to our full-time
equivalents. The $10.7 million increase in full-time billable consultant revenues was primarily
attributable to an increase in our average billing rate resulting from an increase in
performance-based revenues recognized in the third quarter upon meeting performance criteria
associated with several Stockamp engagements. Performance-based fee engagements may cause
significant variations in quarterly revenues and operating results due to the timing of achieving
the performance-based criteria. This increase was partially offset by a slight decline in the
utilization rate of our consultants. The $7.2 million decrease in full-time equivalent revenues
resulted from lower demand for our variable, on-demand consultants in our Accounting and Financial
Consulting and Legal Consulting segments.
37
Total Direct Costs
Our direct costs increased $2.5 million, or 2.4%, to $108.8 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $106.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008. Approximately
$2.2 million of the increase was attributable to the increase in salaries and benefit costs
associated with our revenue generating professionals. Additionally, $1.0 million of the increase in
direct costs was attributable to an increased usage of independent contractors, in particular
within our Legal Consulting segment. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
non-cash compensation of $4.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in
the prior year. We recorded non-cash compensation expense totaling $1.2 million and $6.0 million
during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing Shareholder Payments and
Employee Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements.
Additionally, $0.5 million of the decrease was attributed to a decrease in share-based compensation
expense associated with our revenue-generating professionals. Share-based compensation decreased
14.6% to $3.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $4.1 million in the third quarter of
2008.
Total direct costs for the three months ended September 30, 2009 included $1.0 million of
intangible assets amortization expense, primarily representing customer-related assets and software
acquired in connection with the Stockamp acquisition. This was a decrease of $2.1 million compared
to the same period in the prior year.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $4.7 million, or 13.6%, to $29.7 million in
the third quarter of 2009 from $34.4 million in the third quarter of 2008. Share-based compensation
expense associated with our non-revenue-generating professionals decreased $3.2 million from
$2.8 million in the third quarter of 2008 to a benefit of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2009
resulting from the reversal of share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock
forfeitures in the third quarter of 2009. Additionally, as discussed below, the company
implemented a cost reduction program in the third quarter of 2009 resulting in overall decreases in
general and administrative expenses including marketing, recruiting, training and office supplies,
among others. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in non-revenue
generating professionals and their related compensation and benefits costs related to an increase
in the number of employees.
In response to current market conditions and lowered revenue expectations, during the third quarter
of 2009, we initiated a cost reduction program to align our cost structure with anticipated demand.
This cost reduction effort is estimated to result in an annualized $30 million reduction in
expenses and is primarily comprised of labor related cost savings including salary, benefits and
bonus resulting from a reduction in the number of revenue-generating employees. These efforts are
expected to allow us to maintain appropriate operating margins while paying adequate bonuses until
economic conditions improve. We recorded restructuring expense of $2.1 million, consisting of
severance charges, in the three months ended September 30, 2009. Restructuring expense for the
comparable period in the prior year was $2.3 million.
Expenses incurred in connection with our restatement, discussed above under Restatement of
Previously-Issued Financial Statements, totaled $13.0 million in the third quarter of 2009.
Expenses incurred in connection with the restatement are primarily comprised of legal and
accounting fees, as well as the settlement costs of an indemnification claim arising in
connection with a representation and warranty in a purchase agreement for a previous acquisition.
Depreciation expense increased $0.2 million, or 4.9%, to $4.3 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $4.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 as computers,
network equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements were added to support our
increase in employees. Non-direct intangible assets amortization expense decreased $0.8 million, or
36.4%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $2.2 million for the
comparable period last year. Non-direct intangible assets amortization relates to customer
relationships, non-competition agreements and tradenames acquired in connection with our
acquisitions.
As discussed above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, we engaged in an
impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection with the
preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. We recorded a
$106.0 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill to reduce the carrying value
of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial Consulting reporting unit ($59.0 million) and our
Corporate Consulting reporting unit ($47.0 million). The impairment charge is non-cash in nature
and does not affect the Companys liquidity.
38
Operating Income
Operating income decreased $110.3 million to an operating loss of $94.1 million in the third
quarter of 2009 from operating income of $16.2 million in the third quarter of 2008. Operating
margin, which is defined as operating income expressed as
a percentage of revenues, decreased to (54.6%) in the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to 9.6% in the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in operating margin was
primarily attributable to the $106 million goodwill impairment charge and $13.0 million of
restatement related expense, partially offset by a decrease in non-cash compensation expense
totaling $1.2 million and $6.0 million during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, no further
Shareholder Payments or Employee Payments will be made as a result of amendments to the agreements
among the selling shareholders effective August 1, 2009, and earn-outs for the period after August
1, 2009 are accounted for as additional purchase consideration and
not also as non-cash
compensation expense. We recognized $1.2 million of non-cash compensation
expense during the third quarter of 2009 related to Shareholder
Payments and Employee Payments for the period July 1 to
July 31, 2009, in addition to the $7.1 million previously
recognized for the first six months of 2009. We expect to incur a moderate increase in cash compensation expense in future periods
related to Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments for such periods, which we currently estimate
to be no more than $4 million in each of 2009, 2010 and 2011. Additionally, as a result of the
impact that our restatement may have on our business, we expect to incur a moderate increase in
cash and share-based compensation expense to retain our top-performing employees. We also expect an
increase in operating expenses, including legal fees, as a result of the Companys inquiries into
the acquisition-related payments and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the
restatement, the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to the restatement
and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for certain documents and
the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in respect of the
restatement. To the extent permitted by law, our by-laws and articles of incorporation require that we
indemnify our officers and directors against judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement,
including attorneys fees, incurred in connection with civil or criminal action or proceedings,
as it relates to their services to us if such person acted in good faith. Although there is no
limit on the amount of indemnification, we may have recourse against our insurance carrier for
certain payments made.
Other Expense
Other expense decreased $3.2 million, or 59.1%, to $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 from
$5.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. The $3.2 million decrease was primarily due to the
following:
|
|
|
$1.7 million was attributable to a decrease in interest expense resulting from a
decrease in interest rates, which was partially offset by higher levels of borrowings. |
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million was attributable to a gain from an increase in the market value of
our investments that are used to fund our deferred compensation liability. This gain was
offset by an increase in direct costs as our corresponding deferred compensation
liability increased. |
|
|
|
|
$0.3 million was related to an increase in unrealized exchange rate gains. |
As further described below under Liquidity and Capital Resources, the fees and interest we pay on
outstanding borrowings vary based on our total debt to EBITDA ratio as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. The fees and interest expense we pay on outstanding borrowings in the future may exceed
those paid historically as a result of a decrease in our EBITDA and the impact of a lower EBITDA on
the total debt to EBITDA ratio, and also as a result of the amendment to our Credit Agreement as
described above in Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
For the third quarter of 2009, we
recognized income tax benefit of $32.3 million on a loss of
$96.3 million, primarily attributable to the impairment charge on goodwill
of $106.0 million. For the third quarter of 2008, we recognized income tax
expense of $8.3 million on income of $10.8 million. Our effective tax
rate decreased to 33.6% for the third quarter of 2009 from 77.4% in the same
period last year. The lower effective tax rate in 2009 was primarily
attributable to lower non-cash compensation expense, which is not tax
deductible because the Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments resulting in
the non-cash compensation expense were not made by us.
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss was $64.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to net income of
$2.4 million for the same period last year. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the
$106.0 million goodwill impairment charge that was recorded in the third quarter of 2009 and $13.0
million in restatement related expense, partially offset by lower non-cash compensation expense
totaling $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $6.0 million in the third quarter of
2008, representing Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments as described above under Restatement
of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, coupled with a lower effective income tax rate as
described above. Loss per share for the third quarter of 2009 was ($3.16) compared to diluted
earnings per share of $0.12 for the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in earnings per share was
largely due to the goodwill impairment charge coupled with the restatement related expenses
discussed above, partially offset by lower non-cash compensation expense in the third quarter of
2009.
39
Segment Results
Health and Education Consulting
Revenues
Health and Education Consulting segment revenues increased $23.2 million, or 30.3%, to $99.7
million for the third quarter of 2009 from $76.5 million for the third quarter of 2008. Revenues
from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, performance-based engagements and
software support and maintenance arrangements represented 20.5%, 49.9%, 27.3% and 2.3% of this
segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to
33.0%, 56.6%, 8.1% and 2.3%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
Of the overall $23.2 million increase in revenues, $22.5 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants and $0.7 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The
$22.5 million increase in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected an increase in the
number of consultants and the average billing rate per hour primarily due to performance-based
revenues recognized in the period upon meeting performance criteria associated with several
Stockamp engagements. Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant variations in
quarterly revenues and operating results due to the timing of achieving the performance-based
criteria. Additionally, due to the timing of the implementation of processes enabling us to
recognize performance-based revenue in accordance with GAAP subsequent to the acquisition of
Stockamp, we recognized more performance-based revenue in 2009 than in the comparable period. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease in the utilization rate for this segment.
Operating Income
Health and Education Consulting segment operating income increased $21.0 million, or 118.2%, to
$38.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $17.7 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The Health and Education Consulting segment operating margin, defined as
segment operating income expressed as a percentage of segment revenues, increased to 38.8% for the
third quarter of 2009 from 23.2% in the same period last year. The increase in this segments
operating margin was attributable to lower non-cash compensation expense, lower amortization
expense as well as lower general and administrative expense, partially offset by restructuring
expense resulting from the cost reduction program implemented in the third quarter of 2009.
Non-cash compensation expense, representing Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments as described
above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, for the Health and Education
Consulting segment totaled $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 and $4.2 million in the third
quarter of 2008 and reduced this segments operating margin by 70 basis points and 550 basis points
in the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Accounting and Financial Consulting
Revenues
Accounting and Financial Consulting segment revenues decreased $8.3 million, or 23.6%, to $26.8
million for the third quarter of 2009 from $35.1 million for the third quarter of 2008. Revenues
from time-and-expense engagements and fixed-fee engagements represented 93.9% and 6.1% of this
segments revenues during the third quarter of 2009, respectively. For the third quarter of 2008,
time-and-expense engagements and fixed-fee engagements represented 95.8% and 4.2%, respectively.
Of the overall $8.3 million decrease in revenues, $5.5 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants and $2.8 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The $5.5
million decrease in full-time billable consultant revenues was primarily due to a decrease in
demand for our consulting services and a decrease in the average billing rate per hour for this
segment. The $2.8 million decrease in full-time equivalent revenues resulted from a decline in
demand for our variable, on-demand consultants.
Operating Income
Accounting and Financial Consulting segment operating income decreased $6.7 million, or 69.8%, to
$2.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $9.6 million in the three
months ended September 30, 2008. Segment operating margin decreased to 10.8% for the third quarter
of 2009 from 27.4% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin
was attributable to higher cash compensation and share-based compensation costs as a percentage of
revenue, partially offset by decreased non-cash compensation expense, primarily representing
Shareholder Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial
Statements. Segment operating margin for the third quarter of 2009 was 10.8%. Non-cash
compensation expense totaling $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 and 2008,
respectively, reduced this segments operating margin by 100 basis points and 230 basis points in
the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
40
Legal Consulting
Revenues
Legal Consulting segment revenues decreased $8.8 million, or 23.1%, to $29.3 million for the third
quarter of 2009 from $38.1 million for the third quarter of 2008. Revenues from time-and-expense
engagements, fixed-fee engagements and performance-based engagements represented 89.7%, 10.3% and
0% of this segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
compared to 94.0%, 5.7% and 0.3%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
Of the overall $8.8 million decrease in revenues, $4.2 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants and $4.6 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The
$4.2 million decrease in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected a decrease in both the
demand for our services coupled with a decrease in the average billing rate per hour for this
segment. The $4.6 million decrease in full-time equivalent revenues reflected a decrease in demand
for our document review services.
Operating Income
Legal Consulting segment operating income decreased $10.3 million, or 65.9%, to $5.4 million in the
three months ended September 30, 2009 from $15.7 million in the three months ended September 30,
2008. Segment operating margin decreased to 18.3% for the third quarter of 2009 from 41.2% in the
same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was attributable to higher
total compensation cost as a percentage of revenues, coupled with an increase in restructuring
expense resulting from the cost reduction program implemented in the third quarter of 2009.
Corporate Consulting
Revenues
Corporate Consulting segment revenues decreased $2.5 million, or 13.5%, to $16.4 million for the
third quarter of 2009 from $18.9 million for the third quarter of 2008. Revenues from
time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements and performance-based engagements represented
57.4%, 36.7% and 5.9% of this segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to 50.0%, 49.9% and 0.1%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
The $2.5 million decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to our full-time billable
consultant revenues, reflecting an overall decrease in demand and a decrease in the number of
consultants for this segment, partially offset by an increase in the utilization rate and average
billing rate per hour for this segment.
Operating Income
Corporate Consulting segment operating income increased $2.7 million, or 118.1%, to $5.0 million in
the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $2.3 million in the three months ended September 30,
2008. Segment operating margin increased to 30.8% for the third quarter of 2009 from 12.2% in the
same period last year. The increase in this segments operating margin reflects lower total
compensation cost as a percentage of revenues as well as lower general and administrative costs.
Non-cash compensation expense, representing Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments as described
above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, for the Corporate Consulting
segment totaled $0.2 million and $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and reduced this segments operating margin by 130 basis points and 530 basis points in the third
quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Revenues
Revenues increased $49.6 million, or 11.0%, to $501.1 million for the first nine months of 2009
from $451.5 million for the first nine months of 2008. We acquired Stockamp on July 8, 2008 and
therefore, revenues for the first nine months of 2009 included revenues generated by Stockamp while
revenues for the first nine months of 2008 included revenues from Stockamp for slightly less than
three months.
Of the overall $49.6 million increase in revenues, $61.8 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants, partially offset by a $12.2 million decrease attributable to our full-time
equivalents. The $61.8 million increase in full-time billable consultant revenues was attributable
to an increase in the number of consultants in our Health and Education Consulting segment
reflecting our acquisition of Stockamp, coupled with an increase in the utilization rate of our
consultants and an increase in our average billing rate resulting from an increase in
performance-based revenues recognized
in the period upon meeting performance criteria associated with several Stockamp engagements.
Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant variations in revenues and operating
results due to the timing of achieving the performance-based criteria. The $12.2 million decrease
in full-time equivalent revenues resulted from lower demand for our variable, on-demand consultants
in our Accounting and Financial Consulting and Legal Consulting segments, partially offset by
higher demand in our Health and Education segment.
41
Total Direct Costs
Our direct costs increased $23.4 million, or 8.0%, to $317.1 million in the first nine months of
2009 from $293.7 million in the first nine months of 2008. Approximately $15.0 million of the
increase was attributable to the increase in the average number of revenue-generating professionals
and the promotion of our employees during the year, including 17 to the managing director level
effective January 1, 2009, and their related salaries and benefits costs. Additionally,
$7.0 million of the increase in direct costs was attributable to an increased usage of independent
contractors, in particular within our Legal Consulting and Health and Education Consulting
segments. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $15.7 million in non-cash
compensation. We recorded non-cash compensation expense totaling $8.3 million and $24.0 million
during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing Shareholder Payments and
Employee Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements.
Share-based compensation expense associated with our revenue-generating professionals was
$12.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $12.3 million in the comparable period
in 2008.
Total direct costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 included $3.7 million and
$3.1 million, respectively, of intangible assets amortization expense, primarily representing
customer-related assets and software acquired in connection with the Stockamp acquisition.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.0 million, or 2.1%, to $98.4 million in
the first nine months of 2009 from $96.4 million in the first nine months of 2008. Of the
$2.0 million increase, $4.3 million was due to an increase in non-revenue generating professionals
and their related compensation and benefits costs, $0.8 million was attributable to increased
severance charges, another $1.2 million was attributable to higher facilities cost, and
$1.1 million was due to an increase in charitable contributions. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease in practice administration expense of $1.4 million. Share-based compensation
expense associated with our non-revenue-generating professionals decreased from $8.1 million in the
first nine months of 2008 to $4.6 million in the first nine months of 2009.
In response to current market conditions and lowered revenue expectations, during the third quarter
of 2009, we initiated a cost reduction program to align our cost structure with anticipated demand.
This cost reduction effort is estimated to result in an annualized $30 million reduction in
expenses and is primarily comprised of labor related cost savings including salary, benefits and
bonus resulting from a reduction in the number of our revenue-generating employees. These efforts
are expected to allow us to maintain appropriate operating margins while paying adequate bonuses
until economic conditions improve. Restructuring expense, consisting of severance charges, was
$2.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Restructuring expense in the same period
in the prior year was $2.3 million.
Expenses incurred in connection with our restatement, discussed above under Restatement of
Previously-Issued Financial Statements, totaled $13.4 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2009. Expenses incurred in connection with the restatement are primarily comprised of legal
and accounting fees, as well as the settlement costs of an indemnification claim arising in
connection with a representation and warranty in a purchase agreement for a previous acquisition.
Depreciation expense increased $2.0 million, or 17.9%, to $13.2 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from $11.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as computers,
network equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements were added to support our
increase in employees. Non-direct intangible assets amortization expense decreased $1.5 million, or
26.8%, to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $5.6 million for the
comparable period last year. Non-direct intangible assets amortization relates to customer
relationships, non-competition agreements and tradenames acquired in connection with our
acquisitions.
As discussed above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, we engaged in an
impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection with the
preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. We recorded a
$106.0 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill to reduce the carrying value
of goodwill in our Accounting and Financial Consulting reporting unit ($59.0 million) and our
Corporate Consulting reporting unit ($47.0 million). The impairment charge is non-cash in nature
and does not affect the Companys liquidity.
42
During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized a gain of $2.7 million relating to the release
of employee non-solicitation agreements and settlement of other contractual obligations.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased $93.5 million to an operating loss of $54.3 million in the first nine
months of 2009 from operating income of $39.2 million in the first nine months of 2008. Operating
margin decreased to (10.8%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 8.7% in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in operating margin was primarily attributable
to the goodwill impairment charge and restatement related expenses, partially offset by lower
non-cash compensation expense totaling $8.3 million and $24.0 million during the first nine months
of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and a gain from the settlement of contractual obligations discussed
above.
As described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, no further
Shareholder Payments or Employee Payments will be made as a result of amendments to the agreements
among the selling shareholders effective August 1, 2009, and earn-outs for the period after August
1, 2009 are accounted for as additional purchase consideration and
not also as non-cash
compensation expense. We recognized $1.2 million of non-cash compensation
expense during the third quarter of 2009 related to Shareholder
Payments and Employee Payments for the period July 1 to
July 31, 2009, in addition to the $7.1 million previously
recognized for the first six months of 2009. We expect to incur a moderate increase in cash compensation expense in future periods
related to Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments for such periods, which we currently estimate
to be no more than $4 million in each of 2009, 2010 and 2011. Additionally, as a result of the
impact that our restatement may have on our business, we expect to incur a moderate increase in
cash and share-based compensation expense to retain our top-performing employees. We also expect an
increase in operating expenses, including legal fees, as a result of the Companys inquiries into
the acquisition-related payments and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the
restatement, the SEC investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the restatement,
the SEC investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request
for certain documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in
respect of the restatement. To the extent permitted by law, our by-laws and articles of incorporation
require that we indemnify our officers and directors against judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement, including attorneys fees, incurred in connection with civil or criminal action
or proceedings, as it relates to their services to us if such person acted in good faith. Although
there is no limit on the amount of indemnification, we may have recourse against our insurance
carrier for certain payments made.
Other Expense
Other expense decreased $2.1 million, or 21.2%, to $7.8 million in the first nine months of 2009
from $9.9 million in the first nine months of 2008. The $2.1 million decrease was primarily due to
the following:
|
|
|
$1.7 million gain from an increase in the market value of our investments that
are used to fund our deferred compensation liability. This gain was offset by an
increase in direct costs as our corresponding deferred compensation liability increased. |
|
|
|
$0.3 million was due to net foreign currency transaction gains. |
|
|
|
$0.1 million was attributable to a decrease in interest expense from a decrease
in interest rates, partially offset by higher levels of borrowings during the first nine
months of 2009. |
As further described below under Liquidity and Capital Resources, the fees and interest we pay on
outstanding borrowings vary based on our total debt to EBITDA ratio as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. As a result of our restatement, our historical EBITDA decreased resulting in higher fees
and interest expense for certain historical periods totaling $0.1 million. We recognized this
amount in the second quarter of 2009. Additionally, the fees and interest expense we pay on
outstanding borrowings in the future may exceed those paid historically as a result of a decrease
in our EBITDA and the impact of a lower EBITDA on the total debt to EBITDA ratio, and also as a
result of the amendment to the Credit Agreement as described above in Restatement of
Previously-Issued Financial Statements.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we recognized income tax benefit of $14.8 million
on a loss of $62.1 million, primarily attributable to the impairment charge on
goodwill of $106.0 million. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we recognized income tax expense of $22.7 million
on income of $29.3 million. Our effective tax rate decreased to 23.9% for
the first nine months of 2009 from 77.4% for the same period last year.
The lower effective tax rate in 2009 was primarily attributable to lower
non-cash compensation expense, which is not tax deductible because the
Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments resulting in the non-cash
compensation expense were not made by us. Excluding the effect of the
non-cash compensation expense, our effective tax rate was higher in 2009 due to
an increase in the valuation allowance for certain foreign losses along with
other new foreign losses that have a lower jurisdictional rate than our
statutory rate.
43
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss was $47.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to net income of
$6.6 million for the same period last year. The decrease in net income in 2009 was primarily due to
the $106.0 million goodwill impairment
charge and the $13.4 million of restatement related expenses, partially offset by lower non-cash
compensation expense totaling $8.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to
$24.0 million in the first nine months of 2008, representing Shareholder Payments and Employee
Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, coupled
with a lower effective income tax rate as described above. Loss per share for the first nine months
of 2009 was $2.36 compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.35 for the first nine months of
2008. The decrease in earnings per share was attributable to the goodwill impairment charge and
restatement related expenses described above, partially offset by lower non-cash compensation
expense and a $2.7 million gain described above.
Segment Results
Health and Education Consulting
Revenues
Health and Education Consulting segment revenues increased $102.2 million, or 56.5%, to $283.2
million for the first nine months of 2009 from $181.0 million for the first nine months of 2008.
Revenues for the first nine months of 2009 included revenues from our acquisition of Stockamp while
revenues for the first nine months of 2008 included revenues from Stockamp for slightly less than
three months as Stockamp was acquired on July 8, 2008. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements,
fixed-fee engagements, performance-based engagements and software support and maintenance
arrangements represented 22.8%, 53.4%, 21.4% and 2.4% of this segments revenues during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to 44.3%, 50.5%, 4.2% and 1.0%,
respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
Of the overall $102.2 million increase in revenues, $93.0 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants and $9.2 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The
$93.0 million increase in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected an increase in the
number of consultants and the average billing rate per hour for this segment primarily due to
performance-based revenues recognized in the period upon meeting performance criteria associated
with several Stockamp engagements. Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant
variations in quarterly revenues and operating results due to the timing of achieving the
performance-based criteria. Additionally, due to the timing of the implementation of processes
enabling us to recognize performance-based revenue in accordance with GAAP subsequent to the
acquisition of Stockamp, we recognized more performance-based revenue in 2009 than in the
comparable period. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the utilization rate for
this segment.
Operating Income
Health and Education Consulting segment operating income increased $51.8 million, or 94.4%, to
$106.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $54.9 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The Health and Education Consulting segment operating margin increased to
37.7% for the first nine months of 2009 from 30.3% in the same period last year. The increase in
this segments operating margin was attributable to lower non-cash compensation expense, lower
share-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenues, and a gain relating to the settlement
of contractual obligations. Non-cash compensation expense, representing Shareholder Payments and
Employee Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements,
for the Health and Education Consulting segment totaled $5.6 million and $10.2 million in the first
nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and reduced this segments operating margin by 190
basis points and 560 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Accounting and Financial Consulting
Revenues
Accounting and Financial Consulting segment revenues decreased $35.0 million, or 31.2%, to $77.0
million for the first nine months of 2009 from $112.0 million for the first nine months of 2008.
Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements and performance-based engagements
represented 92.5%, 7.4% and 0.1% of this segments revenues during the first nine months of 2009,
respectively. For the first nine months of 2008, 96.1% of this segments revenues were from
time-and-expense engagements and 3.9% were from fixed-fee engagements.
44
Of the overall $35.0 million decrease in revenues, $15.9 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants and $19.1 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The $15.9
million decrease in full-time billable consultant revenues was primarily due to a decrease in
demand for our consulting services and a decrease in the average billing rate per hour for this
segment, partially offset by an increase in utilization. The $19.1 million decrease in full-time
equivalent revenues resulted from a decline in demand for our variable, on-demand consultants.
Operating Income
Accounting and Financial Consulting segment operating income decreased $11.0 million, or 58.2%, to
$7.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $18.9 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. Segment operating margin decreased to 10.3% for the first nine months of
2009 from 16.9% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was
attributable to higher cash-compensation cost as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by
lower non-cash compensation expense. Non-cash compensation expense, representing Shareholder
Payments and Employee Payments as described above under Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial
Statements, for the Accounting and Financial Consulting segment totaled $1.9 million and
$10.7 million in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and reduced this segments
operating margin by 240 basis points and 950 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Legal Consulting
Revenues
Legal Consulting segment revenues decreased $10.5 million, or 11.1%, to $83.4 million for the first
nine months of 2009 from $93.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. Revenues from
time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements and performance-based engagements represented
89.3%, 10.6% and 0.1% of this segments revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to 91.7%, 7.3% and 1.0%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
Of the overall $10.5 million decrease in revenues, $8.3 million was attributable to our full-time
billable consultants, and $2.1 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The
$8.3 million decrease in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected a decrease in both the
utilization rate and the average billing rate per hour for this segment. The $2.1 million decrease
in full-time equivalent revenues reflected a decreased demand for our document review services.
Operating Income
Legal Consulting segment operating income decreased $16.1 million, or 49.6%, to $16.3 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $32.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Segment operating margin decreased to 19.6% for the first nine months of 2009 from 34.5% in
the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was attributable to
higher total compensation cost as a percentage of revenues, coupled with an increased level of
investment in personnel, infrastructure, technology and other resources for our document review
business.
Corporate Consulting
Revenues
Corporate Consulting segment revenues decreased $7.2 million, or 11.2%, to $57.4 million for the
first nine months of 2009 from $64.6 million for the first nine months of 2008. Revenues from
time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements and performance-based engagements represented
50.0%, 48.3% and 1.7% of this segments revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to 47.9%, 49.8% and 2.3%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008.
The $7.2 million decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to our full-time billable
consultant revenues, reflecting an overall decrease in demand and a decrease in the number of
consultants for this segment, partially offset by an increase in the utilization rate and average
billing rate per hour for this segment.
Operating Income
Corporate Consulting segment operating income increased $2.8 million, or 17.5%, to $19.1 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $16.3 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Segment operating margin increased to 33.3% for the first nine months of 2009
from 25.2% in the same period last year. Non-cash compensation expense, representing Shareholder
Payments and Employee Payments as described above under
Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements, for the Corporate Consulting segment
totaled $0.8 million and $3.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and reduced this segments operating margin by 140 basis points and 460 basis points
in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
45
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents increased $12.6 million, from $14.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $26.7
million at September 30, 2009. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and
debt capacity available under our credit facility.
Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $52.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $44.4 million for the same period last year. Our operating assets
and liabilities consist primarily of receivables from billed and unbilled services, accounts
payable and accrued expenses, and accrued payroll and related benefits. The volume of services
rendered and the related billings and timing of collections on those billings, as well as payments
of our accounts payable affect these account balances. The increase in cash provided by operations
was attributable to lower bonuses paid during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the same
period last year. The increase in cash during the first nine months of 2009 was partially offset by
an increase in receivables and a decrease in deferred revenues primarily related to Stockamps
software support and maintenance fees, which are billed and collected in advance and recognized as
revenues over the support period, which is generally one year.
Cash used in investing activities was $60.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and $246.3 million for the same period last year. The use of cash in the first nine months of 2009
primarily consisted of payments of additional purchase consideration earned by the selling
shareholders of businesses that we acquired, totaling $47.4 million. The use of cash in 2008
primarily consisted of $168.5 million for the acquisition of Stockamp, $23.0 million for the
buy-out of an earn-out provision, and payments of additional purchase consideration earned by the
selling shareholders of businesses that were acquired totaling $32.8 million. The use of cash in
the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 also included purchases of property and equipment. We
estimate that the cash utilized for capital expenditures in 2009 will be approximately $15 million,
primarily for leasehold improvements, computer equipment and software.
Prior to the September 30, 2009 Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement discussed below, we
could borrow up to $460.0 million under the Credit Agreement. In
addition, the Credit Agreement had an accordion feature allowing
for an additional amount of up to $60.0 million to be borrowed upon approval from the lenders.
Prior to the entry into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreement
consisted of a $240.0 million revolving credit facility (Revolver) and a $220.0 million term loan
facility (Term Loan), which was drawn in a single advance of $220.0 million on July 8, 2008 to
fund, in part, our acquisition of Stockamp.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement which amended,
among other items, the following terms:
|
1. |
|
Reduced the maximum amount of principal that may be borrowed under the Revolver
by $60 million from $240 million to $180 million, and eliminated the $60 million
accordion feature that was available under the Credit Agreement. The borrowing capacity
continues to be reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. |
|
2. |
|
Increased the LIBOR spread, base rate spread and letters of credit fee by 75
basis points in each case and increased the non-use fee from a range of 30 to 50 basis
points to a flat 50 basis points. |
|
3. |
|
Decreased the maximum leverage ratio from 3.00:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 effective
December 31, 2010, lowered the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio from 2.50:1.00 to
2.35:1.00 effective September 30, 2009 and added a financial covenant requiring minimum
net worth to be greater than zero. |
|
4. |
|
Modified the definition of consolidated EBITDA by, among other items, allowing
for the add back of non-cash goodwill impairment charges and other acquisition-related
intangible asset impairment charges, non-cash restructuring charges, and non-cash
compensation charges for the periods ending up to and including September 30, 2009.
Beyond September 30, 2009, we are limited on the future add back of non-cash goodwill
and acquisition-related intangible asset impairment charges up to the lesser of $30
million or 15% of net worth. |
On September 30, 2009, we also entered into the Security Agreement as described above under the
heading Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements.
46
The borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit
and payments under the Term Loan. At September 30, 2009, outstanding letters of credit totaled
$5.6 million and are used as security deposits for our office facilities. As of September 30, 2009,
the borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement was $65.4 million.
Fees and interest on borrowings vary based on our total debt to EBITDA ratio as set forth in
the Credit Agreement. Interest is based on a spread, ranging from 2.25% to 3.25%, as amended, over
the LIBOR or a spread, ranging from 1.25% to 2.25%, as amended, over the base rate (which is the
greater of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or the Prime Rate), as selected by us. The Term Loan
is subject to amortization of principal in fifteen consecutive quarterly installments that began on
September 30, 2008, with the first fourteen installments being $5.5 million each. The fifteenth and
final installment will be the amount of the remaining outstanding principal balance of the Term
Loan and will be payable on February 23, 2012, but can be repaid earlier. All outstanding
borrowings under the Revolver will be due upon expiration of the Credit Agreement on February 23,
2012.
Under the Credit Agreement, dividends are restricted to an amount up to 50% of consolidated net
income (adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation expense) for such fiscal year, plus 50% of
net cash proceeds during such fiscal year with respect to any issuance of capital securities. In
addition, certain acquisitions and similar transactions need to be approved by the lenders. The
Credit Agreement includes quarterly financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of 2.35 to 1.00 and a maximum leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 as of September
30, 2009 and decreasing to 2.75:1.00 effective December 31, 2010, as those ratios are defined in
the Credit Agreement as well as a minimum net worth greater than zero. At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with these financial covenants
with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.96 to 1.00 and a leverage
ratio of 2.21 to 1.00 and net
worth greater than zero.
During the first nine months of 2009, we made borrowings to pay bonuses and additional purchase
consideration earned by selling shareholders of businesses that we acquired and that were accrued
for at December 31, 2008. We also made borrowings to fund our daily operations. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the average daily outstanding balance under our credit facility
was $299.9 million. Borrowings outstanding under this credit facility at September 30, 2009 totaled
$301.5 million, all of which are classified as long-term on our consolidated balance sheet as the
principal under the Revolver is not due until 2012 and we intend to fund scheduled quarterly
payments under the Term Loan with availability under the Revolver. These borrowings carried a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.9%, which we expect will increase in the future due to the
terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, discussed above including the effect of the interest
rate swap described below in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2008 totaled $280.0 million and carried a weighted-average
interest rate of 3.1%. At both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with
our debt covenants.
See above under the heading Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements and note 3.
Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements in the notes to consolidated financial
statements under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain
matters related to the Credit Agreement and our borrowings thereunder in light of the restatement.
See Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a discussion of certain risks and
uncertainties related to the Credit Agreement.
Future Needs
Our primary financing need has been to fund our growth. Our growth strategy is to expand our
service offerings, which will require investment in new hires, acquisitions of complementary
businesses, expansion into other geographic areas, and capital expenditures for information
technology, office space, furniture and fixtures, as well as leasehold improvements. In connection
with our past business acquisitions, we are required under earn-out provisions to pay additional
purchase consideration to the sellers if specific financial performance targets are met. We also
have cash needs to service our credit facility and repay our term loan. Further, we have other cash
commitments relating to other future contractual obligations. Because we expect that our future
annual growth rate in revenues and related percentage increases in working capital balances will
moderate, we believe our internally generated liquidity, together with the borrowing capacity
available under our revolving credit facility and access to external capital resources, will be
adequate to fund our long-term growth and capital needs arising from earn-out provisions, cash
commitments and debt service obligations. Our ability to secure short-term and long-term financing
in the future will depend on several factors, including our future profitability, the quality of
our accounts receivable and unbilled services, our relative levels of debt and equity, and the
overall condition of the credit markets, which declined significantly during 2008 and may continue
to decline in the remainder of 2009.
47
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
For a summary of our commitments to make future payments under contractual obligations, see Item
7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Contractual Obligations in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no significant changes in our
contractual obligations since December 31, 2008 except as described below:
|
|
During the first nine months of 2009, we paid additional purchase consideration to selling
shareholders of businesses that we acquired as financial performance targets were met in 2008.
The aggregate purchase consideration paid totaled $47.4 million. |
|
|
During the first nine months of 2009, our long-term borrowings increased from $280.0 million
as of December 31, 2008 to $301.5 million as of September 30, 2009. |
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Except for operating leases, we have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding fair value (formerly
SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
pronouncement does not require any new fair value measurements in financial statements, but
standardizes its definition and guidance in GAAP. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning
on January 1, 2008 for financial assets and financial liabilities, which did not have any impact on
our financial statements. In February 2008, the FASB delayed by one year the effective date of this
pronouncement for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding business combinations
(formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) Business Combinations). This pronouncement, located under
FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, was issued to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of information in financial statements about a business combination
and its effects. This pronouncement retains the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations, but requires a number of changes. The changes that may have the most significant
impact on us include: contingent consideration, such as earn-outs, will be recognized at its fair
value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be
recognized in earnings until settled; acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs will
be expensed as incurred; previously-issued financial information will be revised for subsequent
adjustments made to finalize the purchase price accounting; reversals of valuation allowances
related to acquired deferred tax assets and changes to acquired income tax uncertainties will be
recognized in earnings, except in certain situations. ASC Topic 805 also requires an acquirer to
recognize at fair value, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that
arises from a contingency provided the asset or liabilitys fair value can be determined on the
date of acquisition. We adopted this pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on
January 1, 2009. For business combinations completed on or subsequent to the adoption date, the
application of this pronouncement may have a significant impact on our financial statements, the
magnitude of which will depend on the specific terms and conditions of the transactions.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding noncontrolling interests
and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary (formerly SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51). This pronouncement, located under
FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was issued to improve the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of financial information provided in financial statements by establishing accounting
and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption
of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding derivative and hedging
activities (formerly SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC
Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, was issued to improve transparency of financial information
provided in financial statements by requiring expanded disclosures about an entitys derivative and
hedging activities. This pronouncement requires entities to provide expanded disclosures about: how
and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. We adopted this pronouncement effective
beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our
financial statements as it contains only disclosure requirements.
48
In April 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding interim disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments (formerly FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments). This
pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, increases the frequency
of fair value disclosures by requiring both interim and annual disclosures. We adopted this
pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements as it contains only disclosure
requirements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding subsequent events (formerly
SFAS No. 165 Subsequent Events). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 855,
Subsequent Events, was issued to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. This pronouncement requires entities to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial
statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We adopted
this pronouncement on a prospective basis effective beginning on April 1, 2009. The adoption of
this pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting pronouncement regarding authoritative GAAP (formerly
SFAS No. 168 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles). This pronouncement, located under FASB ASC Topic 105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as
the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB for nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification is nonauthoritative. We adopted this pronouncement effective beginning on July 1,
2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS
No. 167 was issued to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements.
This statement amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an ongoing
analysis to determine whether the enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. SFAS No. 167 will be effective for us beginning on January 1, 2010. We are
currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this statement may have on our future
financial position, results of operations, earnings per share, and cash flows. SFAS No. 167 has not
yet been codified under FASB ASC Topic 105.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
We have evaluated subsequent events since September 30, 2009 and up to the time of the filing of
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q on November 5, 2009.
On October 29, 2009, we sold a small portion of our Disputes and Investigations practice
specializing in complex accounting matters within our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment.
This portion of the business, which included five Managing Directors and their related staff, was
based in our Boston office. The sale of this group is not expected to have a material impact on
our results of operations.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates, changes in the price of
our common stock and changes in the market value of our investments.
Our exposure to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under our bank credit facility,
which has variable interest rates tied to the LIBOR, Federal Funds Rate or Prime Rate. At
September 30, 2009, we had borrowings outstanding totaling $301.5 million that carried a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.9%. A hypothetical one percent change in this interest rate
would have a $3.0 million effect on our pre-tax income.
On March 20, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of
$100.0 million effective on March 31, 2009 and ending on February 23, 2012. We entered into this
interest rate swap to hedge against the risk of changes in future cash flows related to changes in
interest rate on $100.0 million of the total variable-rate borrowings outstanding under our credit
facility. Under the terms of the agreement, we receive from the counterparty interest on the
$100.0 million notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay to the counterparty a fixed rate
of 1.715%. This swap effectively fixed our LIBOR-based rate for $100.0 million of our debt
beginning on March 31, 2009 and through
February 23, 2012. Including the impact of the swap, the effective interest rate on $100.0 million
of our debt was 4.7% as of September 30, 2009. We expect this hedge to be highly effective.
49
We have not entered into any other interest rate swaps, caps or collars or other hedging
instruments as of September 30, 2009.
In connection with our acquisition of Stockamp and an amendment to the Wellspring Stock Purchase
Agreement, we issued a total of 1,541,036 shares of our common stock to the sellers of Stockamp and
Wellspring. Additionally, we provided them with a protection against a decline in the value of the
shares issued until the restrictions on the shares lapsed. As such, we are subject to market
risk relating to our common stock. Of the 1,541,036 shares issued, the restrictions on 1,210,814
shares lapsed in January 2009 and we were not required to make further payments. The restrictions
on the remaining 330,222 shares that were placed in escrow lapsed in July 2009 and we made a price
protection payment of $0.2 million to Stockamp.
From time to time, we invest excess cash in marketable securities. These investments principally
consist of overnight sweep accounts. Due to the short maturity of our investments, we have
concluded that we do not have material market risk exposure.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As discussed in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and in note 3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements in the notes to
consolidated financial statements under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements, we
have amended our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009. As discussed in those sections, the
Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments were not properly recorded in our financial statements
because senior management did not properly take into account the impact of the selling
shareholders redistribution of the acquisition-related payments when determining the appropriate
accounting treatment. In some cases, senior management was unaware of the redistributions. In other
cases, senior management was aware of the redistributions but either misunderstood or misapplied
the appropriate accounting guidance. As a result, the facts and circumstances surrounding the
Shareholder Payments and Employee Payments were not fully described in representation letters
previously provided to our independent auditors.
Our management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2009. Based on
this evaluation and as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting previously disclosed under Item 9A Controls and Procedures in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and described below, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on
a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under
the Exchange Act and such information is not accumulated and communicated to management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As discussed below, we previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting related to our accounting for certain acquisition-related payments received by
the selling shareholders of specific businesses we acquired that were subsequently redistributed by
the selling shareholders among themselves and to other select Huron employees. As a result of our
identification of such material weakness, we performed substantial additional procedures to
determine how such acquisition-related payments were redistributed among such selling shareholders
and to such employees and to reconcile such redistribution with our underlying records. We also
engaged in a related analysis of our underlying records and our financial statements in light of
the redistribution of the acquisition-related payments to determine the completeness and accuracy
of our underlying records and our financial statements with respect to such redistribution. These
procedures and our related analysis were undertaken to identify the accounting adjustments required
with respect to the redistribution of such acquisition-related payments by the selling shareholders
to ensure that our consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
could be presented in accordance with GAAP.
50
Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, we believe that, because we performed the
substantial additional procedures and analysis described above and recorded the appropriate
accounting adjustments, the consolidated financial
statements for the periods included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are fairly stated in all
material respects in accordance with GAAP.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) for the Company. Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we reevaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this reevaluation, we have
concluded that we did not maintain effective controls to ensure the appropriate recording and
reporting of certain acquisition-related payments. Specifically, the Companys controls were not
designed to ensure that the redistribution of such acquisition-related payments among the selling
shareholders and to certain of our employees was correctly recorded in accordance with GAAP,
including guidance promulgated by the SEC.
This failure to correctly account for the redistribution of such acquisition-related payments
resulted in misstatements in our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, including the quarterly periods in
each of those years, that were not prevented or detected as more fully described in note 3.
Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements in the notes to consolidated financial
statements under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements. This control deficiency
could result in a material misstatement of direct costs, total direct costs and reimbursable
expenses, operating income, income before provision for income taxes, net income, earnings per
share, additional paid-in-capital and retained earnings that could result in a material
misstatement of the Companys annual and interim consolidated financial statements that would not
be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, our management has determined that this
control deficiency constitutes a material weakness. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As described in our 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A and below, we have engaged in and continue to engage in significant efforts to address
the material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting, and management is committed to remediating the
Companys material weakness by year-end.
Management continues to make progress toward achieving the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures. Specifically, the Companys management is continuing
remediation efforts as described below under Managements Remediation Initiatives.
Managements Remediation Initiatives
Remediation generally requires making changes to how controls are designed and then adhering to
those changes for a sufficient period of time such that the effectiveness of those changes is
demonstrated with an appropriate amount of consistency. Management has made improvements in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and is committed to remediating the Companys
material weakness by year-end. Under managements direction, our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
function is responsible for helping develop and monitor managements short-term and long-term
remediation plans.
The
following describes certain of managements remediation initiatives, which are
intended to address our specific material weakness and continue to enhance the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Including new language in all purchase agreements entered into after December 31, 2008
to include specific stipulations regarding acquisition-related payments and allow for the
Company to periodically audit and review the disbursement, if any, of acquisition-related
payments by the sellers; |
|
|
|
Amended agreements amongst sellers related to certain acquisitions prior to 2009 to
include stipulations that prohibit the distribution of acquisition-related payments other
than in accordance with ownership percentages at the date of acquisition and the inclusion
of a clause that allows for the Company to periodically audit and review the disbursement,
if any, of acquisition-related payments by the sellers; |
|
|
|
Requiring certifications from selling shareholders at
time of accrual and at time of cash payment of earn-out distributions
that the payments have been appropriately
distributed and ensuring that deviations, if any, are promptly
reported to the Company; |
|
|
|
Amended the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in September 2009 to require
employee disclosure of all compensation or other payments received,
directly or indirectly, from any entity or individual associated with
the Company or from any entity acquired by the Company; |
|
|
|
Amended the Charter of the Audit Committee to specify
that the Audit Committee will review with management the proposed treatment for acquisition-related
payments; and |
|
|
|
Amended the Charter of the Disclosure Committee to
increase focus on acquisition-related payments. |
51
Collectively, these and other remediation plans have been implemented as we work towards
completing remediation of the Companys material weakness by year-end.
Changes in Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On July 3, 2007, The Official Committee (the Committee) of Unsecured Creditors of Saint Vincents
Catholic Medical Centers of New York d/b/a Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers (St. Vincents),
et al. filed suit against Huron Consulting Group Inc., certain of our subsidiaries, including
Speltz & Weis LLC, and two of our former managing directors, David E. Speltz (Speltz) and Timothy
C. Weis (Weis), in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. On
November 26, 2007, Gray & Associates, LLC (Gray), in its capacity as trustee on behalf of the
SVCMC Litigation Trust, was substituted as plaintiff in the place of the Committee and on
February 19, 2008, Gray filed an amended complaint in the action. Beginning in 2004, St. Vincents
retained Speltz & Weis LLC to provide management services to St. Vincents, and its two principals,
Speltz and Weis, were made the interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of St. Vincents. In May of 2005, we acquired Speltz & Weis LLC. On July 5, 2005, St.
Vincents filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York (Bankruptcy Court). On December 14, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved the retention of
Speltz & Weis LLC and us in various capacities, including interim management, revenue cycle
management and strategic sourcing services. The amended complaint filed by Gray alleges, among
other things, breach of fiduciary duties, breach of the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law,
malpractice, breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, aiding and abetting breaches
of fiduciary duties, certain fraudulent transfers and fraudulent conveyances, breach of the implied
duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation,
and civil conspiracy, and seeks at least $200 million in damages, disgorgement of fees, return of
funds or other property transferred to Speltz & Weis LLC, attorneys fees, and unspecified punitive
and other damages. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend
ourselves in this matter. The suit is in the pre-trial stage and no trial date has been set.
The SEC has commenced an investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups.
We also conducted a separate inquiry, in response to the initial inquiry from the SEC, into the
allocation of time in certain practice groups. This matter had no impact on billings to our
clients, but could have impacted the timing of when revenue was recognized. Based on our internal
inquiry, which is complete, we have concluded that an adjustment to our historical financial
statements is not required with respect to this matter. The SEC investigation with respect to the
allocation of time in certain practice groups is ongoing. We are cooperating fully with the SEC in
its investigations. As often happens in these circumstances, the USAO for the Northern District of
Illinois has contacted our counsel. The USAO made a telephonic request for copies of certain
documents that we previously provided to the SEC, which we have voluntarily provided to the USAO.
In addition, the following purported shareholder class action complaints have been filed in
connection with our restatement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois: (1) a complaint in the matter of Jason Hughes v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E.
Holdren and Gary L. Burge, filed on August 4, 2009; (2) a complaint in the matter of Dorothy
DeAngelis v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 5, 2009; (3) a complaint in the matter of Noel M.
Parsons v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 5, 2009; (4) a complaint in the matter of Adam Liebman
v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne Lipski, filed on August 5,
2009; (5) a complaint in the matter of Gerald Tobin v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E.
Holdren, Gary L. Burge and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on August 7, 2009, (6) a complaint in
the matter of Gary Austin v. Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne
Lipski, filed on August 7, 2009 and (7) a compliant in the matter of Thomas Fisher v. Huron
Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
filed on September 2, 2009. The complaints assert claims under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of
the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and contend that the Company and the
individual defendants issued false and misleading statements regarding the Companys financial
results and compliance with GAAP and seek unspecified damages and reimbursement for fees and
expenses incurred in connection with the action, including attorneys fees. We intend to defend the
actions vigorously.
52
The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in two state derivative suits filed in
connection with the Companys restatement, since consolidated in the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois, Chancery Division on September 21, 2009: (1) a complaint in the matter of Curtis Peters,
derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne
Lipski, each of the members of the Board of Directors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed on
August 28, 2009 (the Peters suit) and (2) a complaint in the matter of Brian Hacias, derivatively
on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and Wayne Lipski, filed
on August 28, 2009 (the Hacias suit). A consolidated complaint is forthcoming. The Peters suit
was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Law Division, and alleges claims for
breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of
corporate assets. The Peters suit also alleges claims for professional negligence against
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Companys independent auditors. The Hacias suit was filed in the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division, and alleges claims for breach of
fiduciary duty, gross negligence, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, breach of contract, waste
of corporate assets, contribution and indemnification and insider trading. Both plaintiffs seek
unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the Company resulting from the restatement and related
matters, disgorgement and reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
suits, including attorneys fees.
The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in three Federal derivative suits filed in
connection with the Companys restatement: (1) a complaint in the matter of Oakland County
Employees Retirement System, derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E.
Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski and each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on
October 7, 2009 (the Oakland suit); (2) a complaint in the matter of Philip R. Wilmore,
derivatively on behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne
Lipski, David M. Shade, and each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on October 12,
2009 (the Wilmore suit); and (3) a complaint in the matter of Lawrence J. Goelz, derivatively on
behalf of Huron Consulting Group Inc. v. Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, Wayne Lipski, David M.
Shade, and each of the members of the Board of Directors, filed on October 12, 2009 (the Goelz
suit). The Oakland suit alleges claims for disgorgement under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control,
gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and aiding and abetting breaches
of fiduciary duty. The Oakland plaintiff seeks unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the
Company resulting from the restatement and related matters, restitution from all defendants and
disgorgement of all profits, benefits or other compensation obtained by the defendants and
reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in connection with the suit, including attorneys
fees. Both the Wilmore suit and the Goelz suit allege claims for breach of fiduciary duty and
unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs Wilmore and Goelz seek unspecified damages allegedly sustained by
the Company resulting from the restatement and related matters, disgorgement and reimbursement for
fees and expenses incurred in connection with the suits, including attorneys fees.
Given the uncertain nature of the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to
the restatement and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for
certain documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in
respect of the restatement (collectively, the restatement matters), and the uncertainties related
to the incurrence and amount of loss, including with respect to the imposition of fines, penalties,
damages, administrative remedies and liabilities for additional amounts, with respect to the
restatement matters, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the restatement matters,
determine whether a liability has been incurred or make a reasonable estimate of the liability that
could result from an unfavorable outcome in the restatement matters. Any such liability could be
material. See Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors and Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for a discussion of certain risks and uncertainties relating to the restatement matters
and certain other risks and uncertainties that are heightened by the restatement matters.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. As of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we are not a party to or
threatened with any other litigation or legal proceeding that, in the opinion of management, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, due to
the risks and uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings, actual results could differ from current
expected results.
53
In addition to the risk factors described below, see Risk Factors in our 2008 annual report on
Form 10-K/A for a complete description of the material risks we face.
On July 31, 2009, we announced our intention to restate our financial statements for the years
ended 2006, 2007 and 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Concurrently, we announced certain senior
management changes. Following such announcements, the price of our common stock declined
significantly. As a result of such decline, we engaged in an
impairment analysis with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill in connection with the
preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and recorded a
$106 million non-cash pretax charge for the impairment of goodwill. The reputational issues raised
by the foregoing, the goodwill impairment charge arising out of the decline in our stock price and
the potential impact of the SEC investigations into the circumstances that led to the restatement
and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs requests for certain documents
and the private shareholder class action litigation and derivative litigation with respect to the
restatement could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, cash flow, overall
liquidity, results of operations or financial condition.
We restated certain of our previously-issued financial statements to correct our accounting for
certain acquisition-related payments received by the selling shareholders of specific businesses we
acquired that were subsequently redistributed by the selling shareholders among themselves and to
other select Company employees. Concurrently with the announcement of the restatement, we announced
that our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer had resigned and that our then Chief Financial
Officer had been replaced and would be leaving the Company and our then Chief Accounting Officer
would be leaving the Company. A new Non-Executive Chairman was elected, and a new Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer were appointed, effective July 31, 2009. The restatement and
these changes in our senior management have raised reputational issues for our businesses, in
particular for our Accounting and Financial Consulting segment.
The damages to our business that may arise out of these reputational issues heighten the risks
described in our 2008 annual report on Form 10-K/A, and specifically may adversely impact our
ability to:
|
|
retain our senior management team, our practice leaders and our other managing directors; |
|
|
hire and retain talented people in an industry where there is great competition for talent; |
|
|
maintain our existing business practices and revenues given our clients ability to terminate
their engagement agreements with little or no notice and without penalty; |
|
|
attract new business in the highly competitive consulting services industry; and |
|
|
continue our growth strategy by hiring individuals or groups of individuals and by acquiring
complementary businesses. |
Finally, the SEC has commenced an investigation with respect to the circumstances that led to the
restatement and a separate investigation into the allocation of time in certain practice groups.
The Company also conducted a separate inquiry, in response to the initial inquiry from the SEC,
into the allocation of time in certain practice groups. In addition, as often happens in these
circumstances, the USAO for the Northern District of Illinois has contacted our counsel and made a
telephonic request for copies of certain documents that we previously provided to the SEC.
Further, several private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits have been filed
in respect of the restatement. While we are fully cooperating with the SEC in its investigations
with respect to the circumstances that led to the restatement and the allocation of time in certain
practice groups, have voluntarily provided to the USAO the documents requested by the USAO and
intend to vigorously defend the lawsuits in respect of the restatement, such investigations,
requests and lawsuits subject us to a number of additional risks, including:
|
|
the diversion of managements time, attention and resources from managing and marketing our
company; |
|
|
increased costs and expenses to respond to the SECs investigations and any requests for
information from the USAO and to defend the private shareholder class action lawsuits and
derivative lawsuits; |
|
|
additional damage to our reputation that may further heighten the risks described above; and |
|
|
the imposition of fines, penalties, damages, administrative remedies and liabilities for
additional amounts resulting from actions or findings by the SEC or the USAO or pursuant to
rulings, orders or judgments by the courts with jurisdiction over the private shareholder
class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits. |
Given the uncertain nature of the SEC investigations with respect to the circumstances that led to
the restatement and the allocation of time in certain practice groups, the USAOs request for
certain documents and the private shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits in
respect of the restatement (collectively, the restatement matters), and the uncertainties related
to the incurrence and amount of loss, including with respect to the imposition of fines, penalties,
damages, administrative remedies and liabilities for additional amounts, with respect to the
restatement matters, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the restatement matters,
determine whether a liability has been incurred or make a reasonable estimate of the liability that
could result from an unfavorable outcome in the restatement matters. Any such liability could be
material.
54
The failure to successfully address any one or more of these risks could have a material adverse
effect on our business, prospects, cash flow, overall liquidity, results of operations or financial
condition.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of certain of the equity
interests in our subsidiaries and a lien on substantially all of our assets and those of our
subsidiary grantors. If we default on these obligations, our lenders may foreclose on our assets,
including our pledged equity interest in our subsidiaries.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into the Security Agreement in connection with our entry into the
Eighth Amendment to the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Security Agreement and to secure our
obligations under the Credit Agreement, we granted our lenders a first-priority lien, subject to
permitted liens, on substantially all of the personal property assets that we and the subsidiary
grantors own. This first-priority lien is in addition to the existing pledge (the Equity Pledge)
that we previously granted to our lenders of 100% of the voting stock or other equity interests in
our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our foreign
subsidiaries. If we default on our obligations under the Credit Agreement, our lenders could
accelerate our indebtedness and may be able to exercise their liens on the equity interests subject
to the Equity Pledge and on their liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our
subsidiary grantors, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operations,
financial condition and liquidity.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Our 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan permits the netting of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock
awards to satisfy individual tax withholding requirements. During the quarter ended September 30,
2009, we re-acquired 26,875 shares of common stock with a weighted-average fair market value of
$46.20 as a result of such tax withholdings as presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Shares Redeemed |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
to Satisfy |
|
|
Average Fair |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Employee Tax |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Withholding |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Requirements |
|
|
Redeemed |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
July 2009 |
|
|
26,441 |
|
|
$ |
46.23 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
August 2009 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
$ |
44.35 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
September 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
$ |
46.20 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A Not applicable.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
As discussed in note 3. Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements in the notes
to consolidated financial statements under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements and
in Restatement of Previously-Issued Financial Statements in Part I Item 2. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, effective August 1,
2009, the selling shareholders of two of the Acquired Businesses each amended certain agreements
related to the earn-outs to provide that future earn-outs will be distributed only to the
applicable selling shareholders and only in accordance with their equity interests on the date the
Company acquired the business with no required continuing employment, and no further Shareholder
Payments or Employee Payments will be made (each such provision, the Agreement with Respect to the
Distribution of Future Earn-outs). On July 29, 2009, the Company entered into a letter
agreement with Rand Consulting LLC, M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R. Shalleck and Leroy J. Mergy amending
the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 31, 2006 by and among the Company, MSGalt & Company LLC
(now known as Rand Consulting LLC) and M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R. Shalleck and Leroy J. Mergy to
set forth the agreement between the parties that the distribution of future earn-outs will be made
in accordance with the Agreement with Respect to Distribution of Future Earn-outs. On July 30,
2009, the Company entered into a letter agreement with David Shade, John F. Tiscornia and George
Whetsell as trustees and David Shade, John F. Tiscornia, George Whetsell, Janice James, Ramona Lacy
and Gordon Mountford as beneficiaries, amending the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 29,
2006 by and among the Company, Wellspring Partners LTD and the former shareholders of Wellspring
Partners LTD to set forth the agreement between the parties that the distribution of future
earn-outs will be made in accordance with the Agreement with Respect to Distribution of Future
Earn-outs.
55
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
here- |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
with |
|
Form |
|
Ending |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
2.1
|
|
Letter agreement, dated
July 29, 2009 by and among
Huron Consulting Services
LLC, Rand Consulting LLC,
M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R.
Shalleck and Leroy J.
Mergy amending the Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated
March 31, 2006, by and
among Huron Consulting
Services LLC, MSGalt &
Company LLC (now known as
Rand Consulting LLC) and
M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R.
Shalleck and Leroy J.
Mergy.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Letter agreement, dated
July 30, 2009 by and among
Huron Consulting Services
LLC, David Shade, John F.
Tiscornia and George
Whetsell as trustees and
David Shade, John F.
Tiscornia, George
Whetsell, Janice James,
Ramona Lacy and Gordon
Mountford as
beneficiaries, amending
the Stock Purchase
Agreement, dated December
29, 2006, by and among
Huron Consulting Services
LLC, Wellspring Partners
LTD and the former
shareholders of Wellspring
Partners LTD.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement
by and between MSGalt &
Company, LLC, Huron
Consulting Services LLC,
M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R.
Shalleck and Leroy J.
Mergy, dated as of
March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/6/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase and Sale
Agreement by and among
Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC, Document
Review Consulting Services
LLC and Robert Rowe, dated
as of July 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
8/3/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement
by and among Wellspring
Partners LTD, the
Shareholders of Wellspring
Partners LTD and Huron
Consulting Group Holdings
LLC, dated as of
December 29, 2006.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated
July 8, 2008, to the Stock
Purchase Agreement, dated
as of December 29, 2006,
by and among Wellspring
Partners LTD, the
shareholders of Wellspring
Partners LTD listed on the
signature page thereto,
and Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
7/9/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement
by and among Glass &
Associates, Inc., the
Shareholders of Glass &
Associates, Inc. and Huron
Consulting Group Holdings
LLC and Huron Consulting
Group Inc., dated as of
January 2, 2007.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Joinder Agreement by and
between John DiDonato and
Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Joinder Agreement by and
between Anthony Wolf and
Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Joinder Agreement by and
between Shaun Martin and
Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
here- |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
with |
|
Form |
|
Ending |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
2.11
|
|
Joinder Agreement by and
between Sanford Edlein and
Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
Joinder Agreement by and
between Dalton Edgecomb
and Huron Consulting Group
Holdings LLC.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
1/8/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement,
dated July 8, 2008, by and
among, Huron Consulting
Group Inc., Huron
Consulting Group Services
LLC, Stockamp &
Associates, Inc. and the
shareholders of Stockamp &
Associates, Inc. listed on
the signature pages
thereto.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
7/9/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated
Certificate of
Incorporation of Huron
Consulting Group Inc.
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
2/16/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated
Bylaws of Huron Consulting
Group Inc.
|
|
|
|
10-Q
|
|
6/30/09
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
8/17/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate.
|
|
|
|
S-1
(File No.
333-115434)
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10/5/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Eighth Amendment to the
Credit Agreement, dated as
of September 30, 2009, by
and among Huron Consulting
Group Inc., the guarantors
and lenders listed on the
signature pages thereto,
and Bank of America, N.A.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Security Agreement, dated
as of September 30, 2009,
by and among the grantors
listed on the signature
pages thereto, and Bank of
America, N.A.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
10/6/09 |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer,
pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer,
pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huron Consulting Group Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 5, 2009 |
/s/ James K. Rojas
|
|
|
James K. Rojas |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Letter agreement, dated July 29, 2009 by and among
Huron Consulting Services LLC, Rand Consulting LLC, M.
Scott Gillis, Joseph R. Shalleck and Leroy J. Mergy
amending the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 31,
2006, by and among Huron Consulting Services LLC,
MSGalt & Company LLC (now known as Rand Consulting LLC)
and M. Scott Gillis, Joseph R. Shalleck and Leroy J.
Mergy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Letter agreement, dated July 30, 2009 by and among
Huron Consulting Services LLC, David Shade, John F.
Tiscornia and George Whetsell as trustees and David
Shade, John F. Tiscornia, George Whetsell, Janice
James, Ramona Lacy and Gordon Mountford as
beneficiaries, amending the Stock Purchase Agreement,
dated December 29, 2006, by and among Huron Consulting
Services LLC, Wellspring Partners LTD and the former
shareholders of Wellspring Partners LTD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |