defa14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a- 6(e)(2) )
o Definitive Proxy Statement
þ Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
Online Resources Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on
table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2009
VOTE THE WHITE PROXY CARD NOW!
Fellow Shareholders:
In our last letter to you, we explained why we believe the interests of Tennenbaum Capital Partners
(Tennenbaum) are in sharp conflict with yours, and that a vote for their hand-picked and paid
Board nominees would damage our prospects for increasing shareholder value (see
http://investor.orcc.com).
The purpose of this letter is to explain why we believe our common shareholders will substantially
benefit from continued execution of the Companys 2007 strategic plan.
WE ARE POISED TO DELIVER SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER VALUE
We believe that the two key causes of recently slowed earnings growth are largely behind us.
Interest rates are at historic lows and unlikely to have a further negative impact on earnings.
Nor do we see signs of a repeat cluster of client losses, particularly given our low revenue per
client concentration and 100% retention rate for large bank clients last year.
As reported by CapIQ, a consensus of equity analysts expect our core earnings per share to grow at
an average of 18% annually over the next five years. Over the next three years, our target is a
20-25% average annual increase in core earnings per share.
Currently, we are valued at approximately 8.5 times trailing 12 month Ebitda. If we maintain this
valuation level and achieve the 18% earnings growth that analysts expect, our shares could trade at
a multiple of our current price by year-end 2011.
This represents only what might be achieved with certain growth rates and Ebitda multiples and is
not a forecast of future share price. We caution investors to be skeptical of any mathematical
stock price model as the results are meaningless if the assumptions are bad. So why should you
believe we can achieve our assumptions?
|
|
Operating Leverage. We invested heavily in organization structure and new product
development needed to take advantage of our acquisitions. Now that our cost structure has
stabilized, we can leverage continuing adoption and transaction growth over this
relatively fixed cost base to expand margins. |
|
|
|
Cost Efficiencies. Our bank and biller network can disburse electronic payments at
little or no incremental cost, saving us approximately $500,000 for every 10% of payments
moved in-network. In 2007, we delivered 20-30% of electronic payments in-network; today we
deliver 50-60% and the rate is increasing. |
|
|
|
New Revenue Streams. Products developed from our acquisitions are just reaching market.
For example, our recently introduced web collections service is being launched by 5 of the 10
largest US credit card issuers. So while the product investment has been made, we are
only just beginning to see the revenue. |
|
|
|
Debt Reduction. In acquiring Princeton eCom we took on significant debt to minimize
shareholder dilution. By repaying debt and generating excess cash, we increase earnings with
lower risk and create the potential for share price to grow faster than earnings. |
We are now seeing real indicators of success in our operating and financial results. In addition to
the payment cost savings and web collections successes already mentioned;
|
|
|
New client sales are at record levels, exceeding even the late 90s when
web-based services were rapidly expanding. We now target fewer but more committed
clients, who value our full suite of web-based financial services. |
|
|
|
|
Cash flow has improved significantly, resulting in more than a 50% increase in
cash and short term investment balances, to over $27 million, in the last six months
alone. Meanwhile, we continue to repay bank debt, which has been reduced by $13
million from its original $85 million. |
We also believe the risks to achieving shareholder value have been significantly reduced. We
acknowledge the challenges and uncertainties of this difficult economy. But as evidenced by our
strong first quarter 2009 preliminary results, we believe that achievement of our stated earnings
goals now depends far more on expense control and debt repayment than on revenue expansion.
We are committed to achieving our earnings targets and our periodic guidance. So while we believe
there is large revenue potential from new product adoption and market share expansion, we have not
included them as large contributors to our earnings growth.
In addition, shareholders could enjoy upside from an increase in interest rates and industry stock
valuation multiples, both of which are now at historic lows.
OUR ATTRACTIVE PAYMENTS NETWORK CREATES AND HEDGES SHAREHOLDER VALUE
Like Tennebaum, we believe we are an attractive acquisition target. Where we differ is that we
believe our acquisition value is increasing not decreasing and shareholders can achieve
significantly better returns by deferring our option to sell the Company. Here is why.
Until 2004, Online Resources was niche web-banking provider focused on the community banks and
credit unions. While this remains a very important market for us, we have since transformed and
diversified the Company into a multi-channel provider servicing commercial billers and banks of all
sizes.
Tennenbaum is now sounding an alarm that community banking core processors are consolidating
implying that potential acquirers are disappearing and investors need to cash out while they can.
This wrongly continues to view us through a 2004 lens.
Tennenbaums focus on core processor acquirers completely ignores the other, larger segments of our
business. Our billers, e-commerce and large bank clients do not depend on banking core processors.
Rather, the convergence occurring in the broader payments business is the driver of our strategic
value.
Close integration of our banking and biller networks is what differentiates us and makes us
valuable. Every time we expand our payments network by adding a bank or biller, we increase our
potential client base and the range of companies who may want to partner with or own us. The
number of potential acquirers of Online Resources is increasing, not decreasing.
We believe we can maximize shareholder value by continuing to execute our plan and reaping the
revenue and earnings benefits of the investments we have already made. If for any reason,
financial performance falls short of expectations, we are convinced there will be multiple
opportunities to monetize the Companys strategic value at a strong premium.
VOTE
FOR THE ONLINE RESOURCES DIRECTORS ON THE WHITE CARD
As lead member of your management team, I ask that you support a Board that is strongly
independent, balanced in its judgments and mindful of all shareholder interests. Each of our
nominees continually challenges us as managers, while supporting our overarching goals of
maximizing shareholder value and client service.
Our nominees deserve your support.
Sincerely,
/s/ Matthew P. Lawlor
Matthew P. Lawlor
Chairman & CEO
- 2 -
Even if you have already voted Tennenbaums blue card,
you can still vote in favor of the Companys nominees.
Just
sign, date and mail the enclosed WHITE card.
Only your latest dated vote will be counted.
|
|
Regardless of how many shares you own, your
vote is very important. Please sign, date and
mail the enclosed WHITE card. |
|
|
|
Please vote each WHITE card you receive since
each account must be voted separately. Only
your latest dated proxy counts. We urge you
NOT to sign any blue card sent to you by
Tennenbaum. |
|
|
|
Even if you have sent a blue card to
Tennenbaum, you have every right to change
your vote. You may revoke that proxy, and vote
as recommended by our Board by signing, dating
and mailing the enclosed WHITE card in the
enclosed envelope. |
|
|
|
If your shares are registered in your own
name, please sign, date and mail the enclosed
WHITE card in the postage-paid envelope
provided today. |
|
|
|
If your shares are held in the name of a
brokerage firm or bank nominee, please sign,
date and mail the enclosed WHITE card in the
postage paid envelope to give your broker or
bank specific instructions on how to vote your
shares. Depending upon your broker or
custodian, you may be able to vote either by
toll-free telephone or by the Internet. Please
refer to the enclosed voting form for
instructions on how to vote electronically.
You may also vote by signing, dating and
returning the enclosed voting form. |
If you have any questions on how to vote your shares,
please call our proxy solicitor:
MORROW & CO., LLC AT (800) 607-0088
- 3 -
Definition of Non-GAAP Measures
Ebitda is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization,
preferred stock accretion and equity compensation expense.
Core net income is defined as net income available to common stockholders before the
amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets, equity compensation expense, income tax
benefit from the release of valuation allowance, income (costs) related to the fair market
valuation of certain derivatives, preferred stock accretion related to the redemption premium and
all other non-recurring charges. Some or all of these items may not be applicable in any given
reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual, Guidance and Hypothetical Financial Performance |
|
(in millions except per share, multiples and percents) |
|
Actual |
|
|
Guidance |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Core EPS |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
Growth (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Ebitda |
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
|
$ |
59.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
Growth (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Actual/Estimated Net Debt (3) |
|
$ |
154.0 |
|
|
$ |
135.0 |
|
|
$ |
114.0 |
|
|
$ |
84.0 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (4) |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Increase in Shareholder Value - Consensus Core EPS Growth, No Valuation Multiple Expansion |
|
(in millions except per share, multiples and percents) |
|
Actual |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
2008 Valuation Multiple (TEV/LTM Ebitda) |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Total Enterprise Value |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
Market Capitalization |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
Share Price |
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
9.12 |
|
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
|
$ |
15.43 |
|
Share Price Growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
% of Total Enterprise Value Owned by Common Shareholders |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
NOTE: |
|
This is not a forecast or statement of any expectation of
future share price. It is only a representation of what
undiscounted future share prices might be acieved assuming a range
of earnings growth rates and valuation multiples. |
(1) based on
consensus analysts expectations of compound annual core EPS growth
over 5 years
(2) based on historical and forecasted relationship
betweencore EPS growth and Ebitda growth
(3) based on scheduled
senior debt repayment, preferred security accretion and forecasted
cash position
(4) assumes an increase of 1.5 million shares per
year for equity plan exercises, price related increases in treasury
method shares included, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to Revenue Without a Change in Interest Rates |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Forecast |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
151.6 |
|
|
$ |
165.0 |
|
Impact of Change in Interest Rates |
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Without a Change in Interest Rates |
|
$ |
155.0 |
|
|
$ |
171.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to Core Net Income per Share, With and Without a Change in Interest Rates |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Forecast |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Common Stockholders per
Share |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Accretion Related to Redemption Premium |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Change in Fair Value of Stock Price Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Theoretical Swap Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Mark to Market Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Expense |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Tax Valuation Allowance Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Intangible Assets |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Other, Including Impact of Treasury Method and Rounding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Net Income per Share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Change in Interest Rates, Net of Tax Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Per Share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Net Income per Share without Change in Interest Rates |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
- 4 -
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING METRICS
- 5 -
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This letter may contain statements about future events and expectations, which are forward-looking
statements. Any statement in this letter that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed
to be a forward-looking statement. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause the companys actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Specifically factors that might cause such
a difference include, but are not limited to: the companys history of losses and anticipation of
future losses; the companys dependence on the marketing efforts of third parties; the potential
fluctuations in the companys operating results; the companys potential need for additional
capital; the companys potential inability to expand the companys services and related products in
the event of substantial increases in demand for these services and related products; the companys
competition; the companys ability to attract and retain skilled personnel; the companys reliance
on the companys patents and other intellectual property; the early stage of market adoption of the
services it offers; consolidation of the banking and financial services industry; and those risks
and uncertainties discussed in filings made by the company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including those risks and uncertainties contained under the heading Risk Factors in
the companys Form 10-K, latest 10-Q, and S-3 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance
should not be placed on such statements.
- 6 -