e10vq
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-21319
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3065140 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
|
30 Corporate Drive
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(781) 359-4000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).þ Yes o No
As
of August 5, 2005, there were 26,722,364 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par
value, outstanding.
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
64,302 |
|
|
$ |
39,036 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
12,589 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
13,206 |
|
|
|
14,368 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
Current
assets related to assets sold |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
92,150 |
|
|
|
74,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
14,117 |
|
|
|
16,293 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
57,628 |
|
|
|
57,628 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
19,831 |
|
|
|
21,247 |
|
Non-current assets
related to assets sold |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
184,180 |
|
|
$ |
170,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,827 |
|
|
$ |
4,694 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
Funds due to merchants |
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
Reserve for restructuring |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
Current liabilities related to assets sold |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
27,436 |
|
|
|
30,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent, less current portion |
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Non-current liabilities related to assets sold |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
|
33,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares
authorized; 30,091,059 and 29,951,826 shares
issued and 26,652,016 and 26,512,783 shares
outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
168,267 |
|
|
|
167,465 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
Retained
earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
(10,072 |
) |
Less: treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(20,787 |
) |
|
|
(20,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
152,678 |
|
|
|
136,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
184,180 |
|
|
$ |
170,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
27,306 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
26,564 |
|
|
|
32,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
|
11,972 |
|
|
|
14,273 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
12,529 |
|
|
|
15,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
|
13,175 |
|
|
|
13,033 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
|
14,035 |
|
|
|
16,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering and development |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
4,045 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
12,068 |
|
|
|
15,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of INS assets |
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
13,359 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,620 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common shares (basic): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (basic) |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted): |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
26,623 |
|
|
|
26,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
27,014 |
|
|
|
26,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
50,801 |
|
|
$ |
47,872 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
6,194 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
53,737 |
|
|
|
55,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
|
25,018 |
|
|
|
26,554 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
26,340 |
|
|
|
28,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
|
25,783 |
|
|
|
21,318 |
|
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
4,004 |
|
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
27,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering and development |
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
8,983 |
|
|
|
8,268 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
7,397 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
25,421 |
|
|
|
27,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) for income taxes |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of INS assets |
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
12,466 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
14,928 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common shares (basic): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.007 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
(0.013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (basic) |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.007 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
(0.013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted): |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
(0.006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
26,592 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
26,963 |
|
|
|
26,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
14,928 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
Gain from discontinued operations |
|
|
12,466 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities for continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Gain on sale
of INS assets, net of taxes |
|
|
(12,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
178 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
(2,533 |
) |
Funds due to merchants |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(5,524 |
) |
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,799 |
) |
|
|
(6,881 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(3,928 |
) |
|
|
(26,335 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
11,222 |
|
|
|
83,693 |
|
Net cash proceeds from the sale of INS assets |
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Authorize.Net, less cash received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities for continuing operations |
|
|
18,912 |
|
|
|
(27,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
(3,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) net assets related to assets sold |
|
|
11,070 |
|
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
25,266 |
|
|
|
(27,524 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
39,036 |
|
|
|
69,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
64,302 |
|
|
$ |
41,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Lightbridge, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, Lightbridge or the Company). Lightbridge
believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of
Lightbridges financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the
periods indicated. Although certain information and disclosures normally included in Lightbridges
annual financial statements have been omitted, Lightbridge believes that the disclosures provided
are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Results of interim periods may not
be indicative of results for the full year or any future periods. These financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
Lightbridges Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Certain prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On April 25, 2005, the Company announced that it had entered into an asset purchase agreement
for the sale of its INS business, which includes its PrePay IN product and related services, to
VeriSign, Inc. (VeriSign). The sale was completed on June 14, 2005 for $17.45 million in cash plus
assumption of certain contractual liabilities. Of the $17.45 million in consideration, $1.495
million is being held in escrow by VeriSign, and $0.25 million is
being held by the Company as a liability to VeriSign, until certain representations and warranties expire
after an 18-month period after closing and will be recorded as a gain, net of possible indemnity
claims at that time. In addition, a liability has been established of $450,000 in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, based on the estimated cost
if the Company were to purchase an insurance policy to cover up to $5 million of indemnification
obligations for certain potential breaches of its intellectual property representations and
warranties in the asset purchase agreement with VeriSign. Such representations and warranties
extend for a period of two years and expire on June 14, 2007. The operating results and financial
condition of the INS segment have been reported as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, as the sale was completed during the second quarter of 2005. All comparative
prior period amounts have been restated in a similar manner. The Company has recorded a gain on the
sale of its INS business of $12.7 million, which has been presented as a gain on sale of
discontinued operations. The Company recorded net income from discontinued operations of $0.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and recorded a net loss from discontinued
operations of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income from discontinued
operations included a $1.4 million settlement of a lawsuit between Lucent Technologies, Inc. and
the Company received the related settlement in the second quarter of 2005.
Summarized financial information for the discontinued operations of the INS business are as
follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Results of operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
3,355 |
|
|
$ |
2,440 |
|
|
$ |
5,285 |
|
|
$ |
5,582 |
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
5,508 |
|
|
|
5,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of INS |
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
13,359 |
|
|
$ |
(525 |
) |
|
$ |
12,466 |
|
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
remaining assets and liabilities from the INS business that the
Company retained are not significant to the Companys ongoing
operations. Accordingly, we have classified the remaining assets and
liabilities, principally consisting of accounts receivable, trade
payables and restructuring accruals, from the INS business on the
Balance Sheet as assets and liabilities related to assets
sold. The Company anticipates that all accounts receivable and
trade payables will be collected and paid by the end of 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Financial position: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
5,313 |
|
|
$ |
5,490 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(3,328 |
) |
|
|
(5,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets related to assets sold |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
3. BUSINESS ACQUISITION
On March 31, 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Authorize.Net Corp.
(Authorize.Net) from InfoSpace, Inc. for $81.6 million in cash. In addition, the Company incurred
approximately $2.0 million in acquisition related costs. Authorize.Net provides credit card and
electronic check payment processing solutions to companies that process orders for goods and
services over the Internet, by phone and mail, at retail locations and on wireless devices.
Authorize.Net connects IP-enabled businesses to large credit card processors and banking
organizations, allowing those businesses to accept electronic payments. The results of operations
of Authorize.Net have been included in the Companys financial statements since the date of the
acquisition. In connection with the Authorize.Net acquisition, the Company recorded a $679,000
charge during the first quarter of 2004 for two in-process research and development (IPR&D)
projects. Please refer to the Companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 for a complete description of this acquisition. Please refer to Part II. Other
Information. Item 1. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of certain pending matters related to the
intellectual property of Authorize.Net.
Pro forma financial information
The
following table presents the unaudited pro forma financial
information from continuing operations of the Company
including Authorize.Net for the six months ended June 30, 2004, as if the acquisition had
occurred at the beginning of 2004, after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments.
The pro forma adjustments include elimination of revenue associated with pre-acquisition deferred
revenue of Authorize.Net, amortization of intangible assets, elimination of interest income
associated with the cash purchase price of the acquisition and related income tax effects.
The
pro forma net loss from continuing operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 excludes the expense of IPR&D
of $679,000 related to the Authorize.Net acquisition due to its non-recurring nature. These results
are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual
operating results or financial position that would have occurred if the transaction had been
consummated on January 1, 2004 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net revenues |
|
$ |
60,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
net loss per basic and diluted share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used
for basic and diluted computation |
|
|
26,794 |
|
Goodwill impairment analysis
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 142 (SFAS 142), the Company
is required to analyze the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets against the
estimated fair value of those assets for possible impairment on an annual basis. If impairment has
occurred, the Company will record a charge in the amount by which the carrying value of the assets
exceeds their estimated fair value. Estimated fair value will generally be determined based on
discounted cash flows. On March 31, 2005, the Company performed the annual impairment test for the
goodwill balance of $57.6 million related to the acquisition of Authorize.Net. The Company used the
discounted cash flow and market methodologies to determine the fair value of the reporting unit
related to these intangible assets. The discounted cash flow methodology is based upon converting
expected cash flows to present value. A comparison of the resulting fair value of the reporting
unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill, indicated that the goodwill balance was not
impaired as of March 31, 2005.
4. DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION
Based upon the way financial information is provided to the Companys Chief Executive Officer
for use in evaluating allocation of resources and assessing performance of the business, the
Company reports its operations in three distinct operating segments, described as follows:
|
|
|
Payment Processing Services (Payment Processing) This segment provides a
transaction processing system under the Authorize.Net® brand that allows businesses to
authorize, settle and manage credit card, electronic check and other electronic payment
transactions online. |
|
|
|
|
Telecom Decisioning Services (TDS) This segment provides wireless subscriber
qualification, risk assessment, fraud screening, consulting services and call center
services to telecom and other companies. |
|
|
|
|
Instant Conferencing Services (Instant Conferencing) This segment provides managed
instant conferencing services through its Lightbridge GroupTalkTM product. |
8
In
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, and the Companys previously filed
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, the Company
reported information on a fourth operating segment, Intelligent Network Solutions (INS), which the
Company has since sold. The INS business provided wireless carriers with a real-time rating engine
for voice, data and IN services for prepaid subscribers, as well as postpaid charging functionality
and telecom calling card services. On April 25, 2005, the Company announced that it had entered
into an asset purchase agreement for the sale of its INS business to VeriSign, which was
completed on June 14, 2005. The operating results and financial condition of the INS segment have
been included as part of the financial results from discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and accordingly, the Companys segment information has been restated. Segment results for the INS business are no longer provided.
All prior period segment financial information has been restated to conform with the current
presentation. See Note 2, Discontinued Operations, for additional information about this sale.
The Company also announced on April 25, 2005 that it would evaluate strategic alternatives for
its TDS business and had engaged investment bankers to investigate a range of possibilities for the
TDS business.
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company made the decision to no longer actively market or
sell its GroupTalk product and took actions to outsource the continuing operations of its Instant
Conferencing segment. The Company expects to continue to provide the services for GroupTalk under
its agreement with America Online, Inc. (AOL). The Company determined that the contract with AOL
was in a loss position and, accordingly, the Company has accrued additional expenses of $0.1
million for the period ended June 30, 2005.
Within segments, performance is measured based on revenue, gross profit and operating income
(loss) realized from each segment. There are no transactions
between segments. The Company generally does
not allocate corporate or centralized marketing and general and administrative expenses to
its business unit segments, because these activities are managed separately from the business
units. Also, the Company does not allocate restructuring expenses and other non-recurring gains or
charges to its business unit segments because the Companys Chief Executive Officer evaluates the
segment results exclusive of these items. Asset information by operating segment is not reported
to or reviewed by the Companys Chief Executive Officer, and therefore the Company has not
disclosed asset information for each operating segment.
Financial
information for each reportable segment from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005, and 2004 were as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment |
|
Instant |
|
Reportable |
|
Reconciling |
|
Consolidated |
June 30, 2005 |
|
TDS |
|
Processing |
|
Conferencing |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
15,817 |
|
|
$ |
10,747 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,564 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,564 |
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
8,470 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
14,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,035 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
5,157 |
|
|
|
(3,190 |
)(1) |
|
|
1,967 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
217 |
(2) |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment |
|
Instant |
|
Reportable |
|
Reconciling |
|
Consolidated |
June 30, 2004 |
|
TDS |
|
Processing |
|
Conferencing |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
23,606 |
|
|
$ |
8,138 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
32,126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,126 |
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
10,434 |
|
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
16,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,761 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
5,378 |
|
|
|
(3,726 |
)(1) |
|
|
1,652 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
337 |
(2) |
|
|
3,115 |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment |
|
Instant |
|
Reportable |
|
Reconciling |
|
Consolidated |
June 30, 2005 |
|
TDS |
|
Processing |
|
Conferencing |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
32,890 |
|
|
$ |
20,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,737 |
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
11,950 |
|
|
|
16,275 |
|
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,397 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
8,842 |
|
|
|
(6,866 |
)(1) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
4,459 |
|
|
|
420 |
(2) |
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment |
|
Instant |
|
Reportable |
|
Reconciling |
|
Consolidated |
June 30, 2004 |
|
TDS |
|
Processing |
|
Conferencing |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Total |
Revenues |
|
$ |
47,414 |
|
|
$ |
8,138 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
55,934 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,934 |
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
20,867 |
|
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
27,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,178 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
(7,822 |
)(1) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
508 |
(2) |
|
|
4,736 |
|
(1) |
|
Reconciling items from segment operating income (loss) to consolidated
operating income (loss) include the following (amounts in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Unallocated corporate and centralized marketing, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
3,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
Unallocated corporate and centralized marketing, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
7,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,866 |
|
|
$ |
7,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents depreciation and amortization included in the unallocated
corporate or centralized marketing, general and administrative
expenses. |
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At June 30, 2005, the Company was holding funds in the amount of $4.6 million on behalf of
merchants utilizing Authorize.Nets eCheck.NetÒ product. The funds are included in cash and
cash equivalents and funds due to merchants on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Authorize.Net typically holds eCheck.Net funds for approximately seven business days; the actual
number of days depends on the contractual terms with each merchant. In addition, at June 30, 2005,
the Company held funds in the amount of $1.8 million on behalf of merchants processing credit card
and Automated Clearing House (ACH) transactions using the
Integrated Payment Solution (IPS) product. The funds are included in
cash and cash equivalents and funds due to merchants on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Credit card funds are held for approximately two business days; ACH funds are held for
approximately four business days, according to the specifications of the IPS product and the
contract between Authorize.Net and the financial institution through which the transactions are
processed.
In addition, the Company currently has $0.6 million on deposit with a financial institution to
cover any deficit account balance that could occur if the amount of eCheck.Net transactions
returned or charged back exceeds the balance on deposit with the financial institution. To date,
the deposit has not been applied to offset any deficit balance, and management believes that the
likelihood of incurring a deficit balance with the financial institution due to the amount of
transactions returned or charged back is remote. The deposit will be held continuously for as long
as Authorize.Net utilizes the ACH processing services of the financial institution, and the amount
of the deposit may increase as processing volume increases.
In 2001, Net MoneyIN, Inc. brought a patent infringement suit in the United States District
Court for the District of Arizona, entitled Net MoneyIN, Inc. v.
VeriSign, Inc., et al., Case No.
CIV 01-441 TUC RCC. Defendants in this case include InfoSpace, Inc. and E-Commerce Exchange,
Inc.
On March 31, 2004, the Company acquired Authorize.Net from InfoSpace, Inc. In the
purchase agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify and defend InfoSpace against this lawsuit.
E-Commerce Exchange, Inc. was a reseller of services provided by Authorize.Net. The reseller
agreement between the parties contains provisions regarding indemnification from Authorize.Net for
claims against the reseller related to services provided under that agreement. Defendant Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. has also requested indemnification, including defense costs, from Authorize.Net
based on certain contracts with Authorize.Net. Neither Lightbridge nor Authorize.Net is a party to
the Net MoneyIN lawsuit, but because the Company is defending the litigation and providing
indemnification to some of the defendants, the Company has potential exposure to liability (in an
undetermined amount) as if the Company was parties to the lawsuit. As with all major litigation,
such liability could be significant and could, if the result of the lawsuit is adverse to the
Company, materially adversely affect the Companys business, operations and financial condition.
Lightbridge and Authorize.Net may be added as parties at a later date.
The lawsuit alleges infringement of certain patents involving payment processing
over computer networks, and names a variety of defendants, including payment processing gateway
providers and banks. Net MoneyIN alleges that numerous products or services infringe its patents,
including the Authorize.Net Payment Gateway Service and eCheck.Net service, and seeks treble
damages, permanent injunctive relief, attorneys fees and costs. Injunctive relief adverse to the
Company could materially adversely affect the Companys business operations and financial
condition.
The defendants have denied the allegations of the plaintiff and have counterclaimed,
seeking a declaration that plaintiffs patents have not been infringed and are invalid. The
litigation is bifurcated, with separate liability and damages phases. The period designated for
fact discovery during the liability phase has concluded. The court held a claim construction
hearing on June 29-30, 2005, but has not yet issued a ruling construing the patent claims, and no
liability-phase trial date has been set. The Company has incurred legal expenses in 2004 of
approximately $200,000 in connection with the defense of this lawsuit following the Companys
acquisition of Authorize.Net, and expect to incur defense costs of approximately $1.2 million to
$1.5 million in 2005. The Company intends to vigorously pursue the Companys defenses to the
lawsuit. The Company is not currently able to estimate the possibility of loss or range of loss,
relating to this claim.
10
As of June 30, 2005, the Companys primary contractual obligations and commercial commitments
are under its operating leases and a letter of credit. The Company maintains a letter of credit in
the amount of $1.6 million, as required for security under the operating lease for its corporate
headquarters. This letter of credit expires in January 2006.
Leases The Company has noncancelable operating lease agreements for office space and certain
equipment. These lease agreements expire at various dates through 2011 and certain of them contain
provisions for extension on substantially the same terms as are currently in effect.
Future minimum payments under operating leases, including facilities affected by
restructurings and the Companys new headquarters lease, consisted of the following at June 30,
2005 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Leases |
Remainder of 2005 |
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
2006 |
|
|
3,907 |
|
2007 |
|
|
3,104 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2,854 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2,208 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
17,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. RESTRICTED CASH
As of June 30, 2005, the Company has provided $1.6 million of cash as collateral for a letter
of credit, which is required for security under an operating lease for its corporate headquarters.
The letter of credit and this related collateral agreement expire in January 2006. In addition, as
described in Note 5 above, the Company has $0.6 million on deposit with a financial institution to
cover any deficit account balance that could occur if the amount of transactions returned or
charged back exceeds the balance on deposit with the financial institution.
7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company applies the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock options granted to
employees. The Company accounts for stock options and awards to non-employees using the fair value
method.
Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with stock awards to employees is
determined as the difference, if any, between the current fair value of the underlying common stock
on the date compensation is measured and the price an employee must pay to exercise the award. The
measurement date for employee awards is generally the date of grant. Under the fair value method,
compensation associated with stock awards to non-employees is determined based on the estimated
fair value of the award itself, measured using either current market data or an established option
pricing model. The measurement date for non-employee awards is generally the date performance of
services is complete.
Had the Company used the fair value method to measure such compensation expense associated
with grants of stock options to employees, reported net loss and basic and diluted loss per share
would have been as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income (loss) as reported |
|
$ |
15,620 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
14,928 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation recorded in net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation measured using the fair value method |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) pro forma |
|
$ |
15,212 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
13,951 |
|
|
$ |
(719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share pro forma |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share pro forma |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The fair value of options on their grant date was measured using the Black-Scholes Option
Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.9% - 4.7 |
% |
Expected life of option grants |
|
1 5 years |
|
1 5 years |
Expected volatility of underlying stock |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
Expected dividend payment rate, as a
percentage of the stock price on the
date of grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that the option pricing model used was designed to value readily tradable
stock options with relatively short lives. The options granted are not tradable and have
contractual lives of up to ten years. Please refer to Note 12.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for a discussion of future changes to
accounting for stock-based compensation.
8. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS)
Basic
EPS is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock.
A
reconciliation of the shares used to compute basic income per share
from continuing operations to those used for
diluted income per share from continuing operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Shares for basic computation |
|
|
26,623 |
|
|
|
26,639 |
|
|
|
26,592 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
Options and warrants (treasury stock method) |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares for diluted computation |
|
|
27,014 |
|
|
|
26,678 |
|
|
|
26,963 |
|
|
|
26,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period
have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and, accordingly, are excluded from the diluted computations
for both periods presented. Had such shares been included, shares for the diluted computation would
have increased by approximately 1,945,000 and 3,996,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively, and approximately 2,459,000 and 3,244,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004, respectively. The EPS calculation has been restated to
reflect the change in income from continuing operations due to the
Companys INS segment now being accounted for as discontinued
operations.
9. RESTRUCTURING RESERVES
In February 2005, the Company decided to outsource the operations of its Instant Conferencing
Services business and close its Fremont, California facility, where its Instant Conferencing
business was located, effective March 31, 2005. This action was part of the streamlining of the
operations of the Company. This action resulted in the termination of 7 employees as follows: 5 in
engineering and development, 1 in sales and marketing and 1 in general and administrative. The
Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $0.5 million relating to employee
severance and termination benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The Company
anticipates that all costs related to this action will be paid by the end of 2005. Lightbridge
expects to continue to provide the services for GroupTalk, its Instant Conferencing product, under
an agreement with AOL.
The following summarizes the changes to the February 2005 restructuring reserve since it was
accrued (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
In January 2005, the Company announced the closing its Broomfield, Colorado call center in
order to take advantage of its other existing call center infrastructure and operate more
efficiently. This action resulted in the termination of approximately 40 employees associated with
product service and delivery at this location. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of
approximately $0.4 million relating to facility closing costs and employee severance and
termination benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The Company anticipates that the
severance costs related to this action will be paid by the end of 2005, and the Company anticipates
that all other costs relating to this action, consisting principally of lease obligations on unused
space, net of estimated sublease income, will be paid by the end of 2008.
The following summarizes the changes to the January 2005 restructuring reserve since it was
accrued (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Facility closing and related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, the Company announced a restructuring of its business in order to lower
overall expenses to better align them with future revenue expectations. This action followed the
Companys announcement of an anticipated revenue reduction as a result of the acquisition of AT&T
Wireless Services, Inc.(AT&T) by Cingular Wireless
LLC (Cingular). This action resulted in the termination of 38
employees, in the Companys corporate offices in Burlington, Massachusetts as follows: 16 in
product and service delivery, 11 in engineering and development, 10 in sales and marketing and 1 in
general and administrative. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1.4
million relating to employee severance and termination benefits during the three months ended
December 31, 2004. Additionally, subsequent to its acquisition of Authorize.Net the Company
relocated its offices in Bellevue, Washington and the remaining rent paid of $0.2 million on the
vacated space was included in restructuring charges during the three months ended December 31,
2004. The Company anticipates that costs related to these actions will be paid by the end of 2005.
The following summarizes the changes to the December 2004 restructuring reserve since December
31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2004, the Company announced a restructuring of its business in accordance with the
sale of the Fraud Centurion product suite to Subex Systems Limited -
NJ (Subex). This action, a continuation of
the Companys emphasis on expense management, resulted in the termination of 9 employees in the
Companys Broomfield, Colorado location as follows: 2 in product and service delivery, and 7 in
engineering and development. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $0.2
million relating to employee severance and termination benefits during the three months ended
December 31, 2004. All costs related to this action were paid by the end of the second quarter of
2005.
The following summarizes the changes to the October 2004 restructuring reserve since December
31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2004, the Company announced a restructuring of its business in order to lower
overall expenses to better align them with future revenue expectations. This action, a continuation
of the Companys emphasis on expense management, resulted in the termination of 64 employees and 2
contractors in the Companys corporate offices in Burlington, Massachusetts and its Broomfield,
Colorado location as follows: 12 in product and service delivery, 16 in engineering and
development, 25 in sales and marketing and 13 in general and administrative. The Company recorded a
restructuring charge of approximately $2.1 million relating to employee severance and termination
benefits during the three months ended September 30, 2004. The Company anticipates that all costs
related to this action will be paid by the end of 2005.
13
The following summarizes the changes to the September 2004 restructuring reserve since
December 31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2004, the Company announced a reorganization of its internal business operations.
This action, a continuation of the Companys emphasis on expense management, resulted in the
termination of 10 individuals in the Companys corporate office in Burlington, Massachusetts. The
Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $0.5 million relating to employee
severance and termination benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2004. All costs related
to this action were paid by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
The following summarizes the changes to the January 2004 restructuring reserves since December
31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2003, the Company announced that it would be streamlining its existing Broomfield,
Colorado call center operations into its Lynn, Massachusetts facility and a smaller facility in
Broomfield, Colorado by the end of May 2003. In the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company
recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $0.1 million relating to employee severance and
termination benefits. In the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded an additional
restructuring charge associated with this action of approximately $1.0 million, consisting of
approximately $0.6 million in future lease obligations for unused facilities and approximately $0.4
million for capital equipment write-offs. The capital equipment write-offs and all of the severance
costs related to this restructuring were incurred by the end of 2003 and all other costs relating
to this action have been paid by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
The following summarizes the changes to the March 2003 restructuring reserves since December
31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closing and related costs |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2002, the Company announced that it was reducing its workforce by seven percent and
consolidating its Waltham, Massachusetts call center operations into its Lynn, Massachusetts and
Broomfield, Colorado facilities by the end of 2002. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of
approximately $3.6 million, consisting of $1.6 million relating to employee severance and
termination benefits, $1.3 million for facilities reductions including lease obligations, utilities
and security costs on unused space and $0.7 million for capital equipment write-offs associated
with these measures. The restructuring plan resulted in the termination of 65 personnel as follows:
25 in product and service delivery, 22 in development, 11 in sales and marketing and 7 in general
and administrative. The capital equipment write-offs and a majority of severance costs related to
this action were incurred by the end of 2002, and the Company anticipates that all other costs
relating to this action, consisting principally of lease obligations on unused space, will be paid
by the end of 2005.
The following summarizes the changes to the June 2002 restructuring reserves since December
31, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued |
|
Utilized |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closing and related costs |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
10. PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES
The Company provides for income taxes on an interim basis based on the full-year projected
effective tax rate. The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $0.1 million
includes a full valuation allowance for federal and state net operating loss carryforwards expected
in 2005 and a provision for foreign taxes. The income tax provision for the six months ended June
30, 2004 reflects a net benefit of $0.05 million which consists of an income tax provision at an
annual effective tax rate of 132%, plus a $0.3 million tax benefit related to the recognition of
prior year research and development tax credits less a $0.06 million provision to establish a tax
valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets. The 132% rate differs from the federal
statutory rate primarily due to the impact of state taxes, changes in valuation allowances for
certain deferred tax assets and benefit from federal and state tax credits.
At June 30, 2005, the Company continues to believe a full valuation
allowance is required until an appropriate level of profitability is
sustained that would enable the Company to conclude that it is more
likely than not that a portion of the Companys deferred taxes
would be realizable.
11. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The amounts that comprise comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income (loss) as reported |
|
$ |
15,620 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
14,928 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gain (loss) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
15,635 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
15,153 |
|
|
$ |
(178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This Statement is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and its related
implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. The Statement requires
entities to recognize stock compensation expense for awards of equity instruments to employees
based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). SFAS No. 123R is
effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The
Company is evaluating the two methods of adoption allowed by SFAS No. 123R: the
modified-prospective transition method and the modified-retrospective transition method.
In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 regarding the Staffs
interpretation of SFAS No. 123R. This interpretation provides the Staffs views regarding
interactions between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides
interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The interpretive
guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and investors
and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided. The Company will
follow the guidance prescribed in SAB No. 107 in connection with its adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be
forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words believes, anticipates,
plans, expects and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
including the factors set forth under the heading Risk Factors below that may cause the actual
results, performance and achievements of Lightbridge to differ materially from those indicated by
the forward-looking statements. Lightbridge undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements it makes.
AIRPAY BY AUTHORIZE.NET, ALIAS, ALTALINKS, AUTHORIZE-IT, AUTHORIZE.NET, the Authorize.Net logo,
AUTHORIZE.NET WHERE THE WORLD DOES BUSINESS ON THE WEB, AUTHORIZE.NET WHERE THE WORLD TRANSACTS,
ECHECK.NET, FRAUDBUSTER, FRAUD CENTURION, FRAUDSCREEN.NET, FRAUD SENTINEL, LIGHTBRIDGE, the
Lightbridge logo, POCKET AUTHORIZE.NET, PROFILE, AND TELESTO are registered trademarks of
Lightbridge, and @RISK, AUTHORIZE.NET YOUR GATEWAY TO IP TRANSACTIONS, CAS, CUSTOMER ACQUISITION
SYSTEM, CDS, CREDIT DECISION SYSTEM, ECHECK, EDS, ENHANCED DECISION MANAGEMENT, FRAUD DETECTION
SUITE, GROUPTALK, INSIGHT, LIGHTBRIDGE TELESERVICES, POPS, POINT OF PURCHASE SYSTEM, RMS, and
RETAIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM are trademarks of Lightbridge. All other trademarks or trade names
appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective owners.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Lightbridge has identified and discussed certain critical accounting policies and estimates in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company did not modify its
critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Those policies and
estimates have been applied in the preparation of the Companys financial statements included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview and Revenue Recognition
We develop, market and support a suite of products and services for merchants and
communications providers, including payment processing, customer acquisition and qualification,
risk management, prepaid billing, authentication and instant teleconferencing.
A majority of our revenues historically have been derived from clients located in the United
States. Our revenues are derived from transaction services, consulting and maintenance services,
software licensing and hardware.
Transaction services revenues related to payment processing are derived from our credit card
processing and Automated Clearing House (ACH) processing services, and other services (collectively, payment processing
services), per-transaction fees, gateway fees and set-up fees. Payment processing services revenue
is based on a fee per transaction and is recognized in the period in which the transaction occurs.
Gateway fees are monthly subscription fees charged to our merchant customers for the use of our
payment gateway. Gateway fees are recognized in the period in which the service is provided.
Set-up fees represent one-time charges for initiating our payment processing services. Although
these fees are generally paid to us at the commencement of the agreement, they are recognized
ratably over the estimated average life of the merchant relationship, which is determined through a
series of analyses of active and deactivated merchants. Commissions paid to outside sales partners
are recorded in sales and marketing expense in our statements of operations.
Other transaction service revenues are derived primarily from the processing of applications
for qualification of subscribers for telecommunications services and the activation of services for
those subscribers. We have expanded our telecommunications transactions offerings from credit
evaluation services to include screening for subscriber fraud, evaluating carriers existing
accounts, interfacing with carrier and third-party systems and providing call center services. We
also offer transaction services to screen and authenticate the identity of users engaged in online
transactions. Our transaction-based solutions provide multiple, remote, systems access for
workflow management, along with centrally-managed client-specified business policies, and links to
client and third-party systems. Transaction services are provided through contracts with carriers
and others, which specify the services to be utilized and the markets to be served. Our clients
are charged for these services on a per transaction basis. Pricing varies depending primarily on
the volume and type of transactions, the number and type of other products and services selected
for integration with the services and the term of the contract under which services are provided.
The volume of transactions processed varies depending on seasonal and retail trends, the success of
the carriers and others utilizing our services in attracting subscribers and the markets served by
our clients. Transaction revenues are recognized in the period in which the services are
performed.
16
We also offer instant voice conferencing transaction services through our GroupTalk offering.
No significant revenues have been recognized from our GroupTalk offering to date and the Instant
Conferencing business segment is not expected to generate significant revenues in 2005. On March
31, 2005, we closed our Fremont, California facility, where our Instant Conferencing business is
located. We expect to continue to provide the services for GroupTalk, our Instant Conferencing
product, under our agreement with America Online, Inc.
(AOL). We determined that the contract with
AOL is in a loss position and, accordingly, we have accrued additional expenses of $0.1 million for
the period ended June 30, 2005.
Our consulting revenues are derived principally from providing solution development and
deployment services and business advisory consulting in the areas of customer acquisition and
retention, authentication, prepay billing and risk management. The majority of consulting
engagements are performed on a time-and-materials basis and revenues from these engagements are
generally recognized as the services are performed. When we perform work under a fixed-fee
arrangement, revenues are generally recognized as services are performed. Revenues from software
maintenance contracts are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Our software licensing revenues consist of revenues attributable to the licensing of our CAS
Application Modules and PrePay billing software. The PrePay billing system allows carriers to
market and manage prepaid wireless services to customers. Prepay is licensed as a packaged
software product and each product generally requires incidental customization or integration with
other products and systems to varying degrees. Software licensing revenues are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has been made, and a fixed
fee and collectibility have been determined. Our hardware revenues historically have been derived
in connection with sales of our PrePay and PhonePrint products. Revenue from hardware is
recognized upon shipment, unless testing, integration or other services are required, in which case
it is recognized upon commissioning and acceptance of the product. Revenue from hardware sold in
conjunction with software is deferred until the software revenue is recognized.
Recent Developments
On
April 25, 2005, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement
for the sale of our INS business, which includes our PrePay IN product and related services, to
VeriSign, Inc. (VeriSign). The sale was completed on June 14, 2005 for $17.45 million in cash plus
assumption of certain contractual liabilities. Of the $17.45 million in consideration, $1.495
million is being held in escrow by VeriSign, and $0.25 million is
being held by us as a liability to VeriSign, until certain representations and warranties expire
after an 18-month period after closing and will be recorded as a gain, net of possible indemnity
claims at that time. In addition, a liability has been established of $450,000 in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, based on the estimated cost
if we were to purchase an insurance policy to cover up to $5 million of indemnification
obligations for certain potential breaches of our intellectual property representations and
warranties in the asset purchase agreement with VeriSign. Such representations and warranties
extend for a period of two years and expire on June 14, 2007. The operating results and financial
condition of the INS segment have been reported as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, as the sale was completed during the second quarter of 2005. All comparative
prior period amounts have been restated in a similar manner. We have recorded a gain on the
sale of our INS business of $12.7 million, which has been presented as a gain on sale of
discontinued operations. We recorded net income from discontinued operations of $0.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and recorded a net loss from discontinued
operations of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income from discontinued
operations included a $1.4 million settlement of a lawsuit between Lucent Technologies, Inc.
and us received the related settlement in the second quarter of 2005.
Also on April 25, 2005, we announced that we would evaluate strategic alternatives for our
Telecom Decisioning Services(TDS) business and had engaged investment bankers to investigate a range of
possibilities for our TDS business, including a sale or other disposition.
In November 2004, we announced that we expected that our future revenues from AT&T Wireless
Services, Inc.(AT&T) will decline significantly as a result of the acquisition of AT&T by
Cingular Wireless LLC.(Cingular) As a result of the acquisition, AT&T customer activations will
transition from our system to Cingulars internal system, and we do not expect that AT&T
will be a significant customer in 2005. Our services agreements with
Sprint Spectrum L.P. (Sprint) and Nextel Operations, Inc
(Nextel) expire on
December 31, 2006. On December 15, 2004, Sprint and Nextel announced that their respective Boards
of Directors had approved a definitive agreement for a merger of the two companies. We are unable
to predict the effect of the merger of Sprint and Nextel on our relationship with either customer
including, without limitation, the timing or extent of any reductions in applications processed or
other services provided under our contracts with those customers. It is possible that Sprint or
Nextel could elect not to renew their agreements, to reduce the volume of products and services
they purchase from us, or to request significant changes to the pricing or other terms in
any renewal agreement. A loss of one or more of these major clients, a decrease in orders by one
or more of these clients or a change in the combination of products and services they obtain from
us would adversely affect our revenues, margins and net income.
In 2004, we determined that we would no longer actively market or sell our Retail Management
System (RMS) product or our PhonePrint product. In October 2004, we completed the sale of certain
assets related to our Fraud Centurion software product to Subex
Systems Limited NJ (Subex). As a
result of these actions, we do not expect to recognize significant future revenues from these
products.
17
On March 31, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Authorize.Net from InfoSpace
Inc., for $81.6 million in cash. We also incurred approximately $2.0 million in
acquisition-related transaction costs. Authorize.Net is a provider of payment solutions for online
customer transactions. The Authorize.Net payment gateway provides credit card and electronic check
solutions to companies that process orders for goods and services over the Internet, by phone and
mail, at retail locations and on wireless devices. Authorize.Net connects small and medium sized
businesses to large credit card processors and banking organizations, allowing those businesses to
accept electronic payments.
Operating Segments
Based upon the way financial information is provided to the Companys Chief Executive Officer
for use in evaluating allocation of resources and assessing performance of the business, we report
our operations in three distinct operating segments, described as follows:
|
|
|
Payment Processing Services (Payment Processing) This segment provides a
transaction processing system, under the Authorize.Net® brand, that allows businesses to
authorize, settle and manage credit card, electronic check and other electronic payment
transactions online. |
|
|
|
|
Telecom Decisioning Services (TDS) This segment provides wireless subscriber
qualification, risk assessment, fraud screening, consulting services and call center
services to telecom and other companies. |
|
|
|
|
Instant Conferencing Services (Instant
Conferencing) This segment provides managed
instant conferencing services through its Lightbridge GroupTalkTM product. |
In
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, and our previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, we reported
information on a fourth operating segment, Intelligent Network
Solutions (INS), which we have since
sold. The INS business provided wireless carriers with a real-time rating engine for voice, data
and IN services for prepaid subscribers, as well as postpaid charging functionality and telecom
calling card services. As noted below, the INS segment is now reported under discontinued
operations.
On April 25, 2005, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement for the
sale of our INS business to VeriSign, which was completed on June 14, 2005. The operating
results and financial condition of the INS segment have been included as part of the financial
results from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Segment results for the INS business are no longer provided. All prior period segment financial
information has been restated to conform with the current presentation. See Note 4, Discontinued
Operations, for additional information about this sale.
We also announced on April 25, 2005 that we would evaluate strategic alternatives for our TDS
business and had engaged investment bankers to investigate a range of possibilities for the TDS
business.
In the first quarter of 2005, we made the decision to no longer actively market or sell our
GroupTalk product and took actions to outsource the continuing operations of our
Instant Conferencing segment. We expect to continue to provide the services for GroupTalk under
our agreement with AOL. We determined that the contract with AOL is in a
loss position and, accordingly, we have accrued additional expenses of $0.1 million for the period
ended June 30, 2005.
Within segments, performance is measured based on revenue, gross profit and operating income
(loss) realized from each segment. There are no transactions
between segments. We do not allocate certain corporate or centralized marketing and general and administrative expenses to
our business unit segments, because these activities are managed separately from the business
units. Also, we do not allocate restructuring expenses and other non-recurring gains or
charges to our business unit segments because our Chief Executive Officer evaluates the
segment results exclusive of these items. Asset information by operating segment is not reported
to or reviewed by our Chief Executive Officer, and
therefore we have not disclosed asset information for each operating segment.
The historical operating results associated with our RMS product, which we no longer actively
market or sell, are included in our TDS segment. The historical operating results associated with
our PhonePrint product, which we no longer actively market or sell, and our Fraud Centurion
products, which we sold to Subex in 2004, are included in our INS segment. The historical
operating results associated with our Mobile Data Manager product, which we no longer actively
market or sell, are included in our Instant Conferencing segment.
18
Results Of Operations
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 Compared with Quarter Ended June 30, 2004.
Revenues. Revenues and certain revenue comparisons for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and
2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
27,306 |
|
|
$ |
(2,159 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
)% |
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
(52.1 |
) |
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,564 |
|
|
$ |
32,126 |
|
|
$ |
(5,562 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in transaction services revenues was primarily due to a $4.8 million decline
in transactions services revenues from our TDS segment offset by a $2.6 million increase in
Authorize.Nets revenue. The decline in TDS transaction services revenues was primarily a result
of a $4.2 million reduction in transaction fees charged to AT&T and a 8% decrease in the
volume of subscriber applications processed for clients other than AT&T. Authorize.Nets
revenues for the quarter increased 32% compared to the same period in
2004. The increased revenues
were the result of an increase in the number of merchant customers and increased volume of
transactions processed.
In the near term, we expect transaction services revenue from Authorize.Net to continue to
increase. However, in the near term, we also expect transaction services revenue associated with
our TDS segment to decline from the second quarter 2005 level as a result of declining revenues
from AT&T, and continued pricing pressures. We do not expect AT&T to contribute
significant revenues in the quarter ending September 30, 2005. We expect TDS transaction services
revenues to continue to reflect the industrys rate of growth of new subscribers as well as the
rate of switching among carriers by subscribers (subscriber churn). We believe that transaction
revenue in future periods will continue to be impacted by changes in the demand for our transaction
offerings, changes in the combination of services purchased by clients, carrier consolidation
including the proposed merger of Sprint and Nextel (which represented a combined $9.0 million of
our TDS transaction services revenues in the second quarter of 2005), and competitive pricing
pressures.
The decrease in consulting and maintenance services revenues of $1.5 million was principally
due to a decline in consulting and maintenance revenues related to our decision to no longer
actively market, sell or develop our RMS product. Consulting and maintenance services revenues
associated with the RMS product was $.5 million lower in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 than in
the same quarter of the preceding year. In addition, consulting and maintenance services revenues
from AT&T declined $.7 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the
same period in the prior year.
The decline in software licensing and hardware revenues of $1.9 million in the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in the prior year was due to our decision to no longer
actively market, sell or develop our RMS product.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit. Cost of revenues consists primarily of personnel costs,
costs of maintaining systems and networks used in processing qualification and activation
transactions (including depreciation and amortization of systems and networks) and amortization of
capitalized software and acquired technology. Cost of revenues for Authorize.Net, included in
transaction services cost of revenues, consists of expenses associated with the delivery,
maintenance and support of Authorize.Nets products and services, including personnel costs,
communication costs, such as high-bandwidth Internet access, server equipment depreciation,
transactional processing fees, as well as customer care costs. In the future, cost of revenues may
vary as a percentage of total revenues as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the
volume of transactions processed, changes in the mix of transaction revenues between those from
automated transaction processing and those from processing transactions through our TeleServices
call centers, changes in pricing to certain clients and changes in the mix of total revenues among
transaction services revenues, consulting and maintenance services revenues, and software licensing
and hardware revenues.
19
Cost of revenues, gross profit and certain comparisons for the quarters ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
11,972 |
|
|
$ |
14,273 |
|
|
$ |
(2,301 |
) |
|
|
(16.1) |
% |
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(49.0 |
) |
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
12,529 |
|
|
$ |
15,365 |
|
|
$ |
(2,836 |
) |
|
|
(18.5) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services $ |
|
$ |
13,175 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Transaction services % |
|
|
52.4 |
% |
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and maintenance services $ |
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(54.0) |
% |
Consulting and maintenance services % |
|
|
60.7 |
% |
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licensing and hardware $ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(100.0) |
% |
Software licensing and hardware % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit $ |
|
$ |
14,035 |
|
|
$ |
16,761 |
|
|
$ |
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(16.3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit % |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services cost of revenues decreased by $2.3 million in the quarter ended June 30,
2005 from the prior year. In our TDS business, spending decreased in our call centers as a result
of the closing of our Broomfield, Colorado call center, and the staffing shift from that site to
our Liverpool, Nova Scotia call center. We also realized reductions in third party data and
services costs as a result of processing fewer transactions for AT&T, reduced costs for
maintaining systems and networks used in processing qualification and activation transactions, and
headcount-related savings resultant from our 2004 restructuring activities. Transaction services
gross profit and gross profit percentage increased primarily as a result of Authorize.Nets higher
contribution to the transaction services gross profit amount. Authorize.Nets percent of the
transaction services gross profit amount was 64% in quarter ended
June 30, 2005 versus 46% in the
same quarter of the preceding year. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the
transaction services gross profit related to our TDS segment, where the revenue reduction exceeded
the cost of sales expense reduction. Authorize.Net generated a higher gross profit percentage than
our TDS segment, resulting in increased transaction services gross profit percentage in the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 than in the same quarter of 2004.
Consulting and maintenance services cost of revenues decreased by $0.5 million in the second
quarter of 2005. This decrease was attributable to a reduction in headcount associated with the
September and December 2004 restructurings. Consulting and maintenance services gross profit and
gross profit percentage decreased in the second quarter of 2005 due to lower revenues related to
our RMS product and from AT&T.
Software licensing and hardware gross profit and gross profit percentage decreased by $1.9
million in the second quarter of 2005 in comparison with the
comparable period in the prior year. The decline was due to
our decision to no longer actively market, sell or develop our RMS product.
We expect that fluctuations in gross profit may occur in future periods primarily because of a
change in the mix of revenue generated from our two revenue components, and also because of
competitive pricing pressures.
20
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses and certain operating expense comparisons for the three
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Engineering and development |
|
$ |
3,495 |
|
|
$ |
5,527 |
|
|
$ |
(2,032 |
) |
|
|
(36.8) |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
4,045 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(300.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,068 |
|
|
$ |
15,109 |
|
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
|
|
(20.1) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering and Development. Engineering and development expenses include software development
costs, consisting primarily of personnel and outside technical service costs related to developing
new products and services, enhancing existing products and services, and implementing and
maintaining new and existing products and services. The $2.0 million decrease in engineering and
development expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the same quarter in 2004
was primarily due to cost savings associated with the 2004 restructuring activities, our decision
to cease new development and enhancement of our RMS software product and our decision to outsource
our Instant Conferencing support services. Engineering and development expenses as a percentage of
total revenues decreased for the second quarter of 2005 as a result of lower spending.
We expect engineering and development expenses for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 to
continue to decline in comparison to the prior year level, primarily due to benefits of
restructuring activities.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and
travel expenses of direct sales and marketing personnel, as well as costs associated with
advertising, trade shows and conferences. For Authorize.Net, sales and marketing expenses also
include commissions paid to outside sales partners. The decrease of $1.1 million in sales and
marketing expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the same quarter in 2004, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue, was due to the outsourcing of our Instant
Conferencing support services and reduced sales and marketing headcount resulting from our 2004
restructuring activities. Authorize.Net represented $4.0 million of sales and marketing expenses in
the second quarter of 2005 results compared to $3.2 million in the second quarter of 2004. This
increase was offset by reductions in marketing costs for the other portions of our business,
restructuring activities, and reduced sales and marketing program spending as compared with the
second quarter of 2004.
We expect that sales and marketing expenses in the third quarter of 2005 will be relatively
unchanged from the second quarter of 2005. However, we expect sales and marketing expenses to
increase with growth in Authorize.Nets revenues as a result of greater sales partner commissions
associated with these revenues.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist principally of salaries of
executive, finance, human resources and administrative personnel and fees for certain outside
professional services. General and administrative expenses were relatively unchanged in the second
quarter of 2005 as compared to the same quarter of 2004. Lower general and administrative expenses
in other areas of the business, reflecting savings associated with our 2004 restructuring
activities and reduced program spending offset higher spending associated with legal fees and other
spending for professional services.
We do not expect significant changes in the level of general and administrative expenses in
the quarter ending September 30, 2005 from the second quarter of 2005.
Restructuring. Please refer to Note 9 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of our
restructuring activities and related charges.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net primarily consists of interest income earned on our cash
and short-term investment balances. Other income, net increased by $0.2 million in the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 in comparison with the same period in 2004 primarily due to an increase in our
cash and short-term investments balance as a result of cost savings from the 2004 and 2005
restructurings and the cash received for the sale of our INS business.
21
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. We provide for income taxes on an interim basis
based on the full-year projected effective tax rate. The income tax provision for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 of $0.03 million includes a full valuation allowance for federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards expected in 2005 and a provision for foreign taxes. The income tax
provision for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $0.7 million consists of an income tax
provision at an annual effective tax rate of 36.0%, as well as a $0.05 million tax provision for
foreign taxes. At June 30, 2005, we continue to believe a full
valuation allowance is required until an appropriate level of
profitability is sustained that would enable us to conclude that it
is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets
would be realizable.
Results
by Operating Segment. The operating results and financial
condition of the INS Segment have been included as part of the
financial results from discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. Segment results for the INS
business are no longer provided. All prior period segment financial
information has been restated to conform with the current
presentation. Certain operating results and comparisons by operating segment
for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS |
|
$ |
15,817 |
|
|
$ |
23,606 |
|
|
$ |
(7,789 |
) |
|
|
(33.0) |
% |
Payment Processing |
|
|
10,747 |
|
|
|
8,138 |
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Instant Conferencing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(100.0) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,564 |
|
|
$ |
32,126 |
|
|
$ |
(5,562 |
) |
|
|
(17.3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS $ |
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
$ |
10,434 |
|
|
$ |
(4,356 |
) |
|
|
(41.7) |
% |
TDS % |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Processing $ |
|
$ |
8,470 |
|
|
$ |
5,945 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
% |
Payment Processing % |
|
|
78.8 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant Conferencing $ |
|
$ |
(513 |
) |
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
(895 |
) |
|
|
(234.3) |
% |
Instant Conferencing % |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit $ |
|
$ |
14,035 |
|
|
$ |
16,761 |
|
|
$ |
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(16.3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit % |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS |
|
$ |
3,204 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
|
|
(34.2) |
% |
Payment Processing |
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
% |
Instant Conferencing |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating
income |
|
$ |
5,157 |
|
|
$ |
5,378 |
|
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
|
(4.1) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items(1) |
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating loss |
|
$ |
1,967 |
|
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reconciling items consist of certain corporate or centralized
marketing and general and administrative expenses not allocated to our
business unit segments, because these activities are managed
separately from the business units. Also, we do not allocate
restructuring expenses and other non-recurring gains or charges to our
business unit segments because our Chief Executive Officer evaluates
the segment results exclusive of these items. |
22
Revenues by Operating Segment
TDS. The decline in TDS revenues was primarily a result of a $4.9 million reduction in
revenue from AT&T and a $2.1 million reduction in revenue from our RMS product.
Payment Processing. Payment Processing revenues for the quarter have increased 32.1% compared
to the same period in 2004. The increased revenues were the result of an increase in the number of
merchant customers and increased volume of transactions processed.
Instant Conferencing. In 2004, we recorded revenues of $0.4 million related to a contract for
our Mobile Data Manager product. No future revenues from the Mobile Data Manager product are
expected. In 2004 and 2005, we did not record any revenues from our GroupTalk product.
Gross Profit (Loss) by Operating Segment
TDS. The decline in TDS gross profit was a result of lower revenues of 8% as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2004. The impact of the revenue decline was partially offset by a
$3.4 million expense reduction. Spending decreased in our call centers as a result of the closing
of our Broomfield, Colorado call center, and the staffing shift from that site to our Liverpool,
Nova Scotia call center. We also realized reductions in third party data and services costs as a
result of processing fewer transactions for AT&T Wireless, reduced costs for maintaining systems
and networks used in processing qualification and activation transactions, and headcount-related
savings resultant from our 2004 restructuring activities.
Payment Processing. The increase in Payment Processing gross profit was due to the increase
in Authorize.Nets revenue from the prior year.
Instant Conferencing. The reduction in the gross profit reflects spending to support our
relationship with AOL, which began using the GroupTalk product in the second quarter of 2004 along
with additional accrued expenses due to the AOL loss contract accrual, which transpired in the
second quarter of 2005.
Operating Income (Loss) by Operating Segment.
TDS. The decline in TDS operating income reflects the impact of reduced revenues, partially
offset by spending reductions resulting from our 2004 restructuring activities.
Payment Processing. The increase in Payment Processing operating income was due to the
increase in Authorize.Nets revenue from the prior year.
Instant Conferencing. The decrease in Instant Conferencing operating loss reflects increased
cost of sales expenses to support our relationship with AOL, which began using the product in the
second quarter of 2004, offset by lower operating expenses following the 2004 restructuring
activities. We determined that the contract with AOL was in a loss position and, accordingly, we
have accrued additional expenses of $0.1 million for the period ended June 30, 2005.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2004.
Revenues. Revenues and certain revenue comparisons for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
50,801 |
|
|
$ |
47,872 |
|
|
$ |
2,929 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
(1,868 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,737 |
|
|
$ |
55,934 |
|
|
$ |
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(3.9) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The
increase in transaction revenues of $2.9 million was mainly due
to a full two quarters of
Authorize.Net revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The results of Authorize.Nets operations were excluded from our
first quarter 2004 results. As a result, Authorize.Nets revenues were $12.7 million higher for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. A
significant component of Authorize.Nets higher revenues were attributable to a 32% increase in
revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the prior year. The increased revenues
were the result of an increase in the number of merchant customers added and increased volume of
transactions processed. Our TDS business segment transaction revenues were $9.8 million lower for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decline
in TDS transaction services revenues was primarily a result of a $7.6 million reduction in
transaction fees charged to AT&T and a 10% decrease in the volume of subscriber
applications processed for certain clients other than AT&T. The decline was partially
offset by a 34% increase in Nextel subscriber applications for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
The decrease in consulting and maintenance services revenues of $3.3 million was principally
due to lower revenues from AT&T and a decline in consulting and maintenance revenues
related to our decision to no longer actively market, sell or develop our RMS product.
The decline in software licensing and hardware revenues of $1.9 million was primarily due to a
fee from the license of our RMS software product to Sprint for $1.6 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2004.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of revenues, gross profit and certain comparisons for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services |
|
$ |
25,018 |
|
|
$ |
26,554 |
|
|
$ |
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
(5.8) |
% |
Consulting and maintenance services |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
Software licensing and hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
26,340 |
|
|
$ |
28,756 |
|
|
$ |
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(8.4) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services $ |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
$ |
21,318 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Transaction services % |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and maintenance services $ |
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
4,004 |
|
|
$ |
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
(59.7) |
% |
Consulting and maintenance services % |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licensing and hardware $ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
(1,856 |
) |
|
|
(100.0) |
% |
Software licensing and hardware % |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
99.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit $ |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
$ |
27,178 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit % |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction services cost of revenues decreased by $1.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. In our TDS business, spending
decreased in our call centers as a result of the closing of our Broomfield, Colorado call center,
and the staffing shift from that site to our Liverpool, Nova Scotia call center. We also realized
reductions in third party data and services costs as a result of processing fewer transactions for
AT&T, reduced costs for maintaining systems and networks used in processing qualification
and activation transactions, and headcount-related savings resultant from our 2004 restructuring
activities. Transaction services gross profit and gross profit percentage increased primarily as a
result of Authorize.Nets results of operations not being included in our first quarter 2004
results. This resulted in Authorize.Nets higher contribution to the transaction services gross
profit amount for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30,
2004. Authorize.Net generated a higher gross profit percentage than our TDS segment, resulting in
increased transaction services gross profit percentage. This was partially offset by a decrease in
the transaction services gross profit related to our TDS segment, where the revenue reduction
exceeded the cost of sales expense reduction.
24
Consulting
and maintenance services cost of revenues decreased by $0.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was
attributable to a reduction in headcount associated with the September and December 2004
restructurings. Consulting and maintenance services gross profit and gross profit percentage
decreased in the second quarter of 2005 due to lower revenues related to our RMS product and from
AT&T.
Software licensing and hardware gross profit and gross profit percentage decreased by $1.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
The decline is primarily due to a fee from the license of our RMS product to Sprint for $1.6
million in the second quarter of 2004.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses and certain operating expense comparisons for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Engineering and development |
|
$ |
7,888 |
|
|
$ |
10,504 |
|
|
$ |
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
(24.9) |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
8,983 |
|
|
|
8,268 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
7,397 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
(679 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,421 |
|
|
$ |
27,337 |
|
|
$ |
(1,916 |
) |
|
|
(7.0) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering and Development. The decrease in engineering and development expenses for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 was primarily due to cost savings associated with the 2004
restructurings. These savings were partially offset by the addition of engineering and development
expenses for Authorize.Net which were included beginning in the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Engineering and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 as a result of lower expense levels.
Sales and Marketing. The increase in sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 was due to the inclusion of Authorize.Net and the related sales partner commissions
in sales and marketing expense for six months in 2005 as compared to only the three months ended
June 30 in 2004.
General and Administrative. The increase in general and administrative costs for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 was primarily due to expenses incurred as a result of the inclusion of a
full six months of Authorize.Net expenditures in 2005 as compared to only the three months ended
June 30 in 2004 offset by restructuring activities.
Purchased In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D). In connection with the Authorize.Net
acquisition, we recorded a $0.7 million charge during the first quarter of 2004 for two IPR&D
projects. Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a
complete description of this IPR&D charge. There were no IPR&D charges recorded during the six
months ended June 30, 2005.
Restructuring. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we recorded a $0.5 million charge
related to our decision to outsource the operations of our Instant Conferencing Services business
and close our Fremont, California facility, where our Instant Conferencing business was located,
effective March 31, 2005. The charge consisted of employee severance and termination benefits,
which we anticipate will be paid by the end of 2005. We also recorded a $0.4 million restructuring
charge in the first quarter of 2005 related to our decision to close our Broomfield, Colorado call
center. The charge consisted of facility closing costs and employee severance and termination
benefits. We expect that the employee severance and termination benefits will be paid by the end of
2005 while the facility closing costs, consisting principally of unused space, net of estimated
sublease income, will be paid by the end of 2008.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, restructuring charges primarily consisted of a $0.5
million charge related to a reorganization of our internal business operations at our corporate
office in Burlington, Massachusetts. This charge consisted of employee severance and termination
benefits. All costs related to this action were paid by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
Please refer to Note 9 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a complete description of these charges.
25
Other Income, Net. Other income, net primarily consists of interest income earned on our cash
and short-term investment balances. Other income, net increased by $0.3 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2005 in comparison with the same period in 2004 primarily due to an increase in our
cash and short-term investments balances as a result of cost savings from the 2004 and 2005
restructurings.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. We provide for income taxes on an interim basis
based on the full-year projected effective tax rate. The income tax provision for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 of $0.1 million includes a full valuation allowance for federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards expected in 2005 and a provision for foreign taxes. The income tax
provision for the six months ended June 30, 2004 reflects a net benefit of $0.05 million which
consists of an income tax provision at an annual effective tax rate of 132%, plus a $0.3 million
tax benefit related to the recognition of prior year research and development tax credits less a
$0.06 million provision to establish a tax valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets.
The 132% rate differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of state taxes,
changes in valuation allowances for certain deferred tax assets and benefit from federal and state
tax credits. At June 30, 2005, we continue to believe a full
valuation allowance is required until an appropriate level of
profitability is sustained that would enable us to conclude that it
is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets
would be realizable.
Results
by Operating Segment. The operating results and
financial condition of the INS segment have been included as part of
the financial results from discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Segment results for
the INS business are no longer provided. All prior period segment
financial information has been restated to conform with the current
presentation. Certain operating results and comparisons by operating segment for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
Difference |
|
Difference |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS |
|
$ |
32,890 |
|
|
$ |
47,415 |
|
|
$ |
(14,525 |
) |
|
|
(30.6) |
% |
Payment Processing |
|
|
20,847 |
|
|
|
8,138 |
|
|
|
12,709 |
|
|
|
156.2 |
% |
Instant Conferencing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(100.0) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,737 |
|
|
$ |
55,934 |
|
|
$ |
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(3.9) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS $ |
|
$ |
11,950 |
|
|
$ |
20,867 |
|
|
$ |
(8,917 |
) |
|
|
(42.7) |
% |
TDS % |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Processing $ |
|
$ |
16,275 |
|
|
$ |
5,945 |
|
|
$ |
10,330 |
|
|
|
173.8 |
% |
Payment Processing % |
|
|
78.1 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant Conferencing $ |
|
$ |
(828 |
) |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
(326.2) |
% |
Instant Conferencing % |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit $ |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
$ |
27,178 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit % |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS |
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
$ |
(3,224 |
) |
|
|
(36.2) |
% |
Payment Processing |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
587.3 |
% |
Instant Conferencing |
|
|
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
$ |
8,842 |
|
|
$ |
7,663 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items(1) |
|
|
(6,866 |
) |
|
|
(7,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating loss |
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reconciling items consist of certain corporate or centralized
marketing and general and administrative expenses not allocated to our
business unit segments, because these activities are managed
separately from the business units. Also, we do not allocate
restructuring expenses and other non-recurring gains or charges to our
business unit segments because our Chief Executive Officer evaluates
the segment results exclusive of these items. |
Revenues by Operating Segment
TDS. The decline in TDS revenues was primarily a result of a reduction in revenue from AT&T
Wireless and a reduction in revenue from our RMS product. Other contributing factors were a 10%
decrease in the volume of subscriber applications processed for clients other than AT&T Wireless
along with an unfavorable change in the mix of services provided for the six months ended June 30,
2005 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Payment Processing. Lightbridge began recording Payment Processing revenues as of April 1,
2004 following the acquisition of Authorize.Net on March 31, 2004. The six months ended June 30,
2004 includes revenue from April 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004. Authorize.Net revenue for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 increased 26% compared to the same period in 2004 as reported above by
Authorize.Nets former owner, InfoSpace, Inc. The increased revenues were the result of an
increase in the number of merchant customers added and increased volume of transactions processed.
Instant Conferencing. In 2004, we recorded revenues of $0.4 million related to a contract for
our Mobile Data Manager product. No future revenues from the Mobile Data Manager product are
expected. In 2004 and 2005, we did not record any revenues from our GroupTalk product.
Gross Profit (Loss) by Operating Segment
TDS. The decline in TDS gross profit was a result of lower revenue, primarily due to a
reduction in revenue from AT&T, as well as a reduction in revenue from our RMS product,
largely due to a fee from the license of that product to Sprint in the second
quarter of 2004. Other factors contributing to the decline in gross profit were a 10% decrease in
the volume of subscriber applications processed for clients other than AT&T along with an
unfavorable change in the mix of services provided. The impact of the revenue decline was
partially mitigated by a $5.6 million expense reduction. Spending decreased in our call centers as
a result of the closing of our Broomfield, Colorado call center, and the staffing shift from that
site to our Liverpool, Nova Scotia call center. We also realized reductions in third party data
and services costs as a result of processing fewer transactions for AT&T, reduced costs
for maintaining systems and networks used in processing qualification and activation transactions,
and headcount-related savings resultant from our 2004 restructuring activities.
Payment Processing. The increase in Payment Processing gross profit was due to the
acquisition of Authorize.Net on March 31, 2004.
Instant Conferencing. The reduction in the gross profit reflects spending to support our
relationship with AOL, which began using the product in the second quarter of 2004 along with
additional accrued expenses due to the AOL loss contract accrual, which was incurred during the
second quarter of 2005.
Operating Income (Loss) by Operating Segment.
TDS. The decline in TDS operating income reflects the impact of reduced revenues, partially
offset by spending reductions resulting from our 2004 restructuring activities.
Payment Processing. The increase in Payment Processing operating income was due to the
acquisition of Authorize.Net on March 31, 2004.
Instant Conferencing. The decrease in Instant Conferencing operating loss reflects increased
cost of sales expenses to support our relationship with AOL, which began using the product in the
second quarter of 2004, offset by lower operating expenses following the 2004 restructuring
activities. The Company determined that the contract with AOL was in a loss position and,
accordingly, the Company has accrued additional expenses of $0.1 million for the period ended June
30, 2005.
Discontinued Operations
On
April 25, 2005, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement
for the sale of our INS business, which includes our PrePay IN product and related services, to
VeriSign. The sale was completed on June 14, 2005 for $17.45 million in cash plus
assumption of certain contractual liabilities. Of the $17.45 million in consideration, $1.495
million is being held in escrow by VeriSign, and $0.25 million is
being held by us as a liability to VeriSign, until certain representations and warranties expire
after an 18-month period after closing and will be recorded as a gain, net of possible indemnity
claims at that time.
27
In addition, a liability has been established of $450,000 in accordance with
FIN 45 based on the estimated cost if we were to
purchase an insurance policy to cover up to $5 million of indemnification obligations for certain
potential breaches of our intellectual property representations and warranties in the asset
purchase agreement with VeriSign. Such representations and warranties extend for a period of two
years and expire on June 14, 2007. The operating results and financial
condition of the INS segment have been included as part of the financial results from discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 144, as the sale was completed during the second quarter of 2005. All comparative
prior period amounts have been restated in a similar manner.
We have recorded a gain on the
sale of our INS business of $12.7 million, which has been presented as a gain on sale of
discontinued operations. We recorded net income from discontinued operations of $0.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and recorded a net loss from discontinued
operations of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income from discontinued
operations included a $1.4 million settlement of a lawsuit between Lucent Technologies, Inc. and
the us received in the second quarter of 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted
cash of $71.8 million. We believe that our current cash and short-term investment balances will be
sufficient to finance our operations and capital expenditures for the next twelve months.
Thereafter, the adequacy of our cash balances will depend on a number of factors that are not
readily foreseeable such as the impact of general market conditions on our operations, additional
acquisitions or investments, divestitures, restructuring or obligations associated with the closure
of products or facilities, and the sustained profitability of the our operations. We may also
require additional cash in the future to finance growth initiatives including acquisitions.
During the first six months of 2005, we used cash in operating activities of approximately
$5.5 million and generated $18.9 million and $0.6 million in investing and financing activities,
respectively. During the first six months of 2005, we had a gain on sale of our PrePay assets of
$12.7 million and our accounts payable and accrued compensation and benefits decreased by a
combined $2.1 million primarily related to the payment of 2004 bonuses and the timing of payments
to certain significant vendors. Included in cash provided by
investing activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2005, was $15.0 million in net cash proceeds from the sale of PrePay assets
and $1.6 million provided as restricted cash to collateralize a letter of credit supporting the
operating lease for our corporate headquarters.
Our capital expenditures totaled $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The
capital expenditures during this period were principally associated with our service delivery
infrastructure and computer equipment for software development activities. We lease our facilities
and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements that expire at various dates
through January 2011.
Future minimum payments under operating leases, including facilities affected by
restructurings, consisted of the following at June 30, 2005 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Leases |
Remainder of 2005 |
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
2006 |
|
|
3,907 |
|
2007 |
|
|
3,104 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2,854 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2,208 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
17,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
incurred legal expenses in 2004 of approximately $200,000 in
connection with the defense of a lawsuit entitled Net Money IN, Inc.
v. VeriSign, Inc., et. al., following our acquisition of
Authorize.Net, and expect to incur defense costs of approximately
$1.2 million to $1.5 million in 2005. Please refer to Part II. Other
Information. Item 1. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of this
lawsuit.
At June 30, 2005, we were holding funds in the amount of $4.6 million on behalf of merchants
utilizing Authorize.Nets eCheck.Net product. The funds are included in cash and cash equivalents
and funds due to merchants on our consolidated balance sheet. Authorize.Net holds eCheck.Net funds
for approximately seven business days; the actual number of days depends on the contractual terms
with each merchant. In addition, at June 30, 2005, we held funds in the amount of $1.8 million for
and on behalf of merchants processing credit card and ACH transactions using the Integrated Payment
Solution (IPS) product. The funds are included in cash and cash equivalents and funds due to
merchants on our consolidated balance sheet. Credit card funds are held for approximately two
business days; ACH funds are held for approximately four business days, according to the
specifications of the IPS product and the contract between Authorize.Net and the financial
institution through which the transactions are processed.
28
In addition, we currently have $0.6 million on deposit with a financial institution to cover
any deficit account balance that could occur if the amount of eCheck.Net transactions returned or
charged back exceeds the balance on deposit with the financial institution. To date, the deposit
has not been applied to offset any deficit balance, and we believe that the likelihood of incurring
a deficit balance with the financial institution due to the amount of transactions returned or
charged back is remote. The deposit will be held continuously for as long as we utilize the ACH
processing services of the financial institution, and the amount of the deposit may increase as
processing volume increases.
Our primary contractual obligations and commercial commitments are under operating leases and
a letter of credit. We maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $1.6 million that extends
through January 2006. In January 2005, we provided $1.6 million of cash as collateral for that
letter of credit.
Inflation
Although certain of our expenses increase with general inflation in the economy, inflation has
not had a material impact on our financial results to date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This Statement is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and its related
implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. The Statement requires
entities to recognize stock compensation expense for awards of equity instruments to employees
based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). SFAS No. 123R is
effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. We
are evaluating the two methods of adoption allowed by SFAS No. 123R: the modified-prospective
transition method and the modified-retrospective transition method.
In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 regarding the Staffs
interpretation of SFAS No. 123R. This interpretation provides the Staffs views regarding
interactions between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC ruled and regulations and provides
interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The interpretive
guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and investors
and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided. We will follow the
guidance prescribed in SAB No. 107 in connection with our adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
29
Risk Factors
If One or More of Our Major Clients Stops Using Our Products or Services or Changes the Combination
of Products and Services It Uses, Our Operating Results Would Suffer Significantly.
On April 25, 2005, we announced that we engaged investment bankers to explore strategic
alternatives for our TDS business. Our TDS revenues are concentrated among a few major clients. Our
10 largest clients accounted for approximately 57% and 59% of our total revenues in the quarter and
six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. Although our client concentration has declined, we
expect that a majority of our revenues will continue to come from a relatively small number of
clients for the foreseeable future. Consequently, our revenues, margins and net income may
fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter based on the actions of a single significant
client. A client may take actions that significantly affect us for reasons that we cannot
necessarily anticipate or control, such as reasons related to the clients financial condition,
changes in the clients business strategy or operations, the introduction of alternative competing
products or services, acquisitions, or as the result of the perceived quality or cost-effectiveness
of our products or services. Our services agreements with Sprint Spectrum L.P. (Sprint), and
Nextel Operations, Inc. (Nextel) expire on December 31, 2006. Our services agreement with AT&T
Wireless Services, Inc. (AT&T) expires on April 1, 2009, but is subject to earlier termination
upon twelve months notice and designated services upon notice. In February 2004, Cingular Wireless
LLC (Cingular) announced an agreement to acquire AT&T and in October 2004, Cingular announced
that it had completed its merger with AT&T. Cingular is not presently a client of Lightbridge. As a
result of the acquisition of AT&T, we do not expect that client to generate significant revenue in
the remainder of 2005. On December 15, 2004, Sprint and Nextel announced that their respective
Boards of Directors had approved a definitive agreement for a merger of the two companies. We are
unable to predict the effect of the merger of Sprint and Nextel on our relationship with either
client including without limitation the timing or extent of any reductions in applications
processed or other services provided under our contracts with those clients. It is possible that
Sprint and/or Nextel could elect not to renew their agreements, to reduce the volume of products
and services they purchase from us or to request significant changes to the pricing or other terms
in any renewal agreement. The loss of Sprint and/or Nextel or any of our other major clients would
cause sales to fall below expectations and materially reduce our revenues, margins and net income
and adversely affect our business.
Certain of Our Revenues Are Uncertain Because Our Clients May Reduce the Amounts of or Change the
Combination of Our Products or Services They Purchase.
Most of our communications client contracts extend for terms of between one and three years.
During the terms of these contracts, our communications clients typically may elect to purchase any
of several different combinations of products and services. The revenue that we receive for
processing a transaction for such a client may vary significantly depending on the particular
products and services used to process the transaction. In particular, transactions handled through
our TeleServices Group generally result in significantly higher revenue than transactions that are
submitted and processed electronically, but also result in higher cost of revenues. Therefore, our
revenues or margins from a particular client may decline if the client changes the combination of
products and services it purchases from us.
To the extent our client contracts contain minimum purchase or payment requirements, these
minimums are typically at levels significantly below actual or historical purchase or payment
levels. Therefore, our current clients may not continue to utilize our products or services at
levels similar to previous years or at all, and may not generate significant revenues in future
periods. If any of our major clients significantly reduces or changes the combination of products
or services it purchases from us for any reason, our business would be seriously damaged.
A Majority of Our Revenues Are Concentrated in the Wireless Telecommunications Industry, Which Is
Experiencing Declining Growth Rates, Consolidation and Increasing Pressure to Control Costs.
We currently derive a majority of our revenues from companies in the wireless
telecommunications industry, and we expect that wireless telecommunications companies will continue
to account for a majority of our revenues in 2005. In recent years, the growth rate of the domestic
wireless industry has slowed. In addition, consolidation has affected the number of carriers to
whom our products and services can be marketed and sold, and competition among wireless carriers
has continued to increase, resulting in heightened efforts by carriers to control costs. Many of
our carrier clients have sought, and may in the future seek, pricing concessions when they renew
their services agreements with us or at other times, which could affect our revenues, margins and
net income. In addition, certain of our carrier clients have sought bankruptcy protection in recent
years, and we believe it is possible that additional clients may file for bankruptcy protection if
current industry conditions continue. Bankruptcy filings by our clients or former clients such as
WorldCom, Inc. may prevent us from collecting some or all of the amounts owing to us at the time of
filing, may require us to return some or all of any payments received by us within 90 days prior to
a bankruptcy filing and may also result in the termination of our service agreements. As a result
of the foregoing conditions, our success depends on a number of factors:
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our profit margins on sales of products and services to companies in the
wireless telecommunications industry; |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition of our clients and their continuing ability to pay us for services and products; |
30
|
|
|
our ability to develop and market new or enhanced products and services to new and existing clients; |
|
|
|
|
continued growth of the domestic wireless telecommunications markets; |
|
|
|
|
the number of carriers seeking to implement prepaid billing services; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase sales of our products and services internationally. |
Our Exploration of Strategic Alternatives for Our TDS Business May Prove Unsuccessful or May
Otherwise Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Ability to Conduct Business, Our Operations and Our
Financial Condition.
We are taking steps to streamline operations and sharpen our strategic focus. On April 25,
2005, we announced our decision to explore strategic options for our TDS business.
We can offer no assurances that we will be able to locate potential strategic partners for the
TDS business or will be able to consummate any transactions with potential strategic partners we do
locate. Our pursuit of strategic initiatives may prove unsuccessful or may otherwise have a
material adverse effect on our ability to conduct business, our operations and our financial
condition. For example, we may not always be able to obtain the optimal price for assets and
businesses we choose to sell or may receive a price that is substantially lower than the
investments made for the assets or businesses being disposed of. In addition, our continuing
operations may suffer as a result of losing synergies with the assets and businesses sold. Further,
the inherent uncertainty in the process of seeking strategic alternatives could result in loss of
customers or employees, which could impair the value of those assets.
Furthermore, changes to our business may not prove successful in the short or long term and
may negatively impact our financial results. In particular, we expect to experience a decline in
revenue in the short term, in the case of dispositions, and we may incur additional charges due to
restructuring or impairment of assets.
We and Our Clients Must Comply with Complex and Changing Laws and Regulations.
Government regulation influences our activities and the activities of our current and
prospective clients, as well as our clients expectations and needs in relation to our products and
services. Businesses that handle consumers funds, such as our Payment Processing business, are
subject to numerous state and federal regulations, including those related to banking, credit
cards, electronic transactions and communication, escrow, fair credit reporting, privacy of
financial records and others. State money transmitter regulations and federal anti-money laundering
and money services business regulations can also apply under some circumstances. The application of
many of these laws with regard to electronic commerce is currently unclear. In addition, it is
possible that a number of laws and regulations may be applicable or may be adopted in the future
with respect to conducting business over the Internet concerning matters such as taxes, pricing,
content and distribution. If applied to us, any of the foregoing rules and regulations could
require us to change the way we do business in a way that increases costs or makes our business
more complex. In addition, violation of some statutes may result in severe penalties or
restrictions on our ability to engage in e-commerce, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Our clients also include telecommunications companies that, to the extent that they extend
consumer credit, may be subject to federal and state regulations. In making credit evaluations of
consumers, performing fraud screening or user authentication, our clients are subject to
requirements of federal law, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and regulations thereunder, as well
as state laws which impose a variety of additional requirements. Privacy legislation may also
affect the nature and extent of the products or services that we can provide to clients as well as
our ability to collect, monitor and disseminate information subject to privacy protection. Although
most of the products and services we provide to the telecommunications industry, other than our
ProFile service, are not directly subject to these requirements, we must take these extensive and
evolving requirements into account in order to meet our clients needs. In some cases, consumer
credit laws require our clients to notify consumers of credit decisions made in connection with
their applications for telecommunications services, and we have contracted with some of our
clients, including Sprint, AT&T, Nextel, Western Wireless Corporation and Dobson Communications,
Inc., to provide such notices on their behalf. Our software has in the past contained, and could in
the future contain, undetected errors affecting compliance by our clients with one or more of these
legal requirements. Failure to properly implement these requirements in our products and services
in a timely, cost-effective and accurate manner could result in liability, either directly or as
indemnitor of our clients, damage to our reputation and relationships with clients and a loss of
business.
Consumer protection laws in the areas of privacy, credit and financial transactions have been
evolving rapidly at the state, federal and international levels. As the electronic transmission,
processing and storage of financial information regarding consumers continues to grow and develop,
it is likely that more stringent consumer protection laws may impose additional burdens on
companies involved in such transactions. Uncertainty and new laws and regulations, as well as the
application of existing laws to e-commerce, could limit our ability to operate in our markets,
expose us to compliance costs and substantial liability and result in costly and time-consuming
litigation.
31
Furthermore, the growth and development of the market for e-commerce may prompt more stringent
consumer protection laws that may impose additional regulatory burdens on those companies, such as
Lightbridge, that provide services to online business. The adoption of additional laws or
regulations may affect the ability to offer, or cost effectiveness of offering, goods or services
online, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our products and services and increase our
cost of doing business.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. have also enacted regulations affecting our corporate governance, securities disclosure and
compliance practices. We expect these regulations to increase our compliance costs and to make some
of our activities more time-consuming. If we fail to comply with any of these regulations, we could
be subject to legal actions by regulatory authorities or private parties.
We May Become a Party to Intellectual Property Infringement Claims, Which Could Harm Our Business.
From time to time, we have had and may be forced to respond to or prosecute other intellectual
property infringement claims to protect our rights or defend a clients rights. These claims,
regardless of merit, may consume valuable management time, result in costly litigation or cause
product shipment delays, all of which could seriously harm our business and operating results.
Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief
that could effectively block our ability to make, use, sell or otherwise practice our intellectual
property, whether or not patented or described in pending patent applications, or to further
develop or commercialize our products in the U.S. and abroad and could result in the award of
substantial damages against us. We may be required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements
with third parties claiming infringement by us of their intellectual property in order to settle
these claims. These royalty or licensing agreements, if available, may not have terms that are
acceptable to us. In addition, if we are forced to enter into a license agreement with terms that
are unfavorable to us, our operating results would be materially harmed. We may also be required to
indemnify our clients for losses they may incur under indemnification agreements if we are found to
have violated the intellectual property rights of others. Please refer to Part II. Other Information. Item 1. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of
certain pending matters related to our intellectual property.
In
connection with the sale of our INS business to VeriSign on June 14, 2005, we agreed
to indemnify VeriSign for up to $5 million in damages incurred for potential breaches of our
intellectual property representations and warranties in the asset purchase agreement. Such
representations and warranties extend for two years from the date of closing.
Our Future Revenues May Be Uncertain Because of Reliance on Third Parties for Marketing and
Distribution.
Authorize.Net distributes its service offerings primarily through outside sales partners.
Authorize.Nets revenues are derived predominantly through relationships with distribution
partners. In addition, we have entered into a business alliance with VeriSign to
assist us in penetrating the online transaction market for authentication services.
We intend to continue to market and distribute our current and future products and services
through existing and other relationships both in and outside of the United States. There are no
minimum purchase obligations applicable to any existing distributor or other sales and marketing
partners and we do not expect to have any guarantees of continuing orders. Failure by our existing
and future distributors or other sales and marketing partners to generate significant revenues or
our failure to establish additional distribution or sales and marketing alliances or changes in the
industry that render third party distribution networks obsolete could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, distributors and other sales and marketing partners may become our competitors
with respect to the products they distribute either by developing a competitive product themselves
or by distributing a competitive offering. For example, resellers of Authorize.Net products and
services are permitted to and generally do market and sell competing products and services; and
VeriSign may elect to market or acquire alternative fraud and
identity verification products for authentication services.
Competition from existing and future distributors or other sales and marketing partners could
significantly harm sales of our products.
Changes to Credit Card Association Rules or Practices Could Adversely Impact Our Authorize.Net
Business.
Our Authorize.Net credit card payment gateway does not directly access the credit card
associations. As a result, we must rely on banks and their service providers to process our
transactions. We must comply with the operating rules of the credit card associations. The
associations member banks set these rules, and the associations interpret the rules. Some of those
member banks compete with Authorize.Net. Visa, MasterCard, American Express or Discover could adopt
new operating rules or interpretations of existing rules which we might find difficult or even
impossible to comply with, resulting in our inability to give customers the option of using credit
cards to fund their payments. If we were unable to provide a gateway for credit card transactions,
our Authorize.Net business would be materially and adversely affected.
32
We Could Be Subject to Liability as a Result of Security Breaches, Service Interruptions by Cyber
Terrorists or Fraudulent or Illegal Use of Our Services.
Because some of our activities involve the storage and transmission of confidential personal
or proprietary information, such as credit card numbers and social security numbers, and because we
are a link in the chain of e-commerce, security breaches, service interruptions and fraud schemes
could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible monetary
damages. Cyber terrorists have periodically interrupted, and may continue to interrupt, our payment
gateway services in attempts to extort payments from us or disrupt commerce. Our payment gateway
services may be susceptible to credit card and other payment fraud schemes, including unauthorized
use of credit cards or bank accounts, identity theft or merchant fraud. We expect that technically
sophisticated criminals will continue to attempt to circumvent our anti-fraud systems. If such
fraud schemes become widespread or otherwise cause merchants to lose confidence in our services in
particular, or in Internet systems generally, our business could suffer.
In addition, the large volume of payments that we handle for our clients makes us vulnerable
to third-party or employee fraud or other internal security breaches. Further, we may be required
to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches and fraud to
address any problems they may cause.
Our payment system may also be susceptible to potentially illegal or improper uses. These uses
may include illegal online gambling, fraudulent sales of goods or services, illicit sales of
prescription medications or controlled substances, software and other intellectual property piracy,
money laundering, bank fraud, child pornography trafficking, prohibited sales of alcoholic
beverages and tobacco products and online securities fraud. Despite measures we have taken to
detect and lessen the risk of this kind of conduct, we cannot ensure that these measures will
succeed. In addition, regulations under the USA Patriot Act of 2001 may require us to revise the
procedures we use to comply with the various anti-money laundering and financial services laws. Our
business could suffer if clients use our system for illegal or improper purposes or if the costs of
complying with regulatory requirements increase significantly.
Authorize.Net is compliant with Visas Cardholder Information Security Program (CISP) and
MasterCards Site Data Protection (SDP) standard, however, there is no guarantee that we will
maintain such compliance or that compliance will prevent illegal or
improper use of our payment system.
We have expended, and may be required to continue to expend, significant capital resources to
protect against security breaches, service interruptions and fraud schemes. Our security measures
may not prevent security breaches, service interruptions and fraud schemes and the failure to do so
may disrupt our business, damage our reputation and expose us to risk of loss or litigation and
possible monetary damages.
A Failure of, Error in or Damage to Our Computer and Telecommunications Systems Would Impair Our
Ability to Conduct Transactions, Payment Processing and Support Services and Harm Our Business
Operations.
We provide TDS and payment processing transaction services, as well as support services, using
complex computer and telecommunications systems. Our business could be significantly harmed if
these systems fail or suffer damage from fire, natural disaster, terrorism including cyber
terrorism, power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized access by hackers, electronic
break-ins, intrusions or attempts to deny our ability to deploy our services, computer viruses or
similar events. In addition, a growth of our client base, a significant increase in transaction
volume or an expansion of our facilities may strain the capacity of our computers and
telecommunications systems and lead to degradations in performance or system failure. Many of our
agreements with telecommunications carriers contain level of service commitments, which we might be
unable to fulfill in the event of a natural disaster, an actual or threatened terrorist attack or a
major system failure. Errors in our computer and telecommunications systems may adversely impact
our ability to provide the products and services contracted for by our clients. We may need to
expend significant capital or other resources to protect against or repair damage to our systems
that occur as a result of malicious activities, cyber-terrorism, natural disasters or human error,
but these protections and repairs may not be completely effective. Our property and business
interruption insurance and errors and omissions insurance might not be adequate to compensate us
for any losses that may occur as the result of these types of damage. It is also possible that such
insurance might cease to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
The Demand for Our Payment Processing Products and Services Could Be Negatively Affected by a
Reduced Growth of e-Commerce or Delays in the Development of the Internet Infrastructure.
Sales of goods and services over the Internet do not currently represent a significant portion
of overall sales of goods and services. We depend on the growing use and acceptance of the Internet
as an effective medium of commerce by merchants and customers in the United States and as a means
to grow our business. We cannot be certain that acceptance and use of the Internet will continue to
develop or that a sufficiently broad base of merchants and consumers will adopt, and continue to
use, the Internet as a medium of commerce.
33
It is also possible that the number of Internet users, or the use of Internet resources by
existing users, will continue to grow, and may overwhelm the existing Internet infrastructure.
Delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased
levels of Internet activity could also have a detrimental effect on the Internet and
correspondingly on our business. These factors would adversely affect usage of the Internet, and
lower demand for our products and services.
Our Reliance on Suppliers and Vendors Could Adversely Affect Our Ability to Provide Our Services
and Products to Our Clients on a Timely and Cost-Efficient Basis.
We rely to a substantial extent on third parties to provide some of our equipment, software,
data, systems and services. In some circumstances, we rely on a single supplier or limited group of
suppliers. For example, our Payment Processing business requires the services of third-party
payment processors. If any of these processors cease to allow us to access their processing
platforms, our ability to process credit card payments would be severely impacted. In addition, we
depend on our Originating Depository Financial Institution partner to
process ACH transactions, and our ability to process these transactions would be severely impacted if we
were to lose such partner for any reason.
Our reliance on outside vendors and service providers also subjects us to other risks,
including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components and reduced
control over quality, pricing and timing of delivery of components. For example, in order to
provide our credit verification service, we need access to third-party credit information databases
provided to us by outside vendors. Similarly, delivery of our activation services often requires
the availability and performance of billing systems which are also supplied by outside vendors. If
for any reason we were unable to access these databases or billing systems, our ability to process
credit verification transactions could be impaired.
In addition, our business is materially dependent on services provided by various
telecommunications providers. A significant interruption in telecommunications services including,
without limitation, a power loss could seriously harm our business.
From time to time, we must also rely upon third parties to develop and introduce components
and products to enable us, in turn, to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely
and cost-effective basis. We may not be able to obtain access, in a timely manner, to third-party
products and development services necessary to enable us to develop and introduce new and enhanced
products. We may not be able to obtain third-party products and development services on
commercially reasonable terms and we may not be able to replace third-party products in the event
such products become unavailable, obsolete or incompatible with future versions of our products.
On-Demand Voice Conferencing Services May Become Subject to Traditional Telecommunications Carrier
Regulation by Federal and State Authorities, Which Would Increase the Cost of Providing Our
Services, Require Us to Suspend Services to Existing Clients, and May Subject Us to Penalties.
Although we believe that traditional telecommunications carrier regulations do not apply to
our GroupTalk on-demand, voice conferencing services, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and state public service commissions may require us to submit to such regulations for our GroupTalk
service under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and various state laws or regulations as
provider of telecommunications services. If the FCC or any state public service commission seeks to
enforce any of these laws or regulations against us, we could be prohibited from providing the
voice aspect of our voice conferencing service until we have obtained various federal and state
licenses and filed tariffs. We believe we would be able to obtain those licenses, although in some
states, doing so could significantly delay our ability to provide services. We also could be
required to comply with other aspects of federal and state laws and regulations. Subjecting our
voice conferencing service to these laws and regulations would increase our operating costs, may
require us to suspend service to existing clients, could require restructuring of those services to
charge separately for the voice and other components, and would involve on-going reporting and
other compliance obligations. We also might be subject to fines or forfeitures and civil or
criminal penalties for non-compliance.
We Have Made and May Continue to Make Acquisitions, Which Involve Risks.
We acquired Authorize.Net Corporation in March of 2004. We may also make additional
acquisitions in the future if we identify companies, technologies or assets that appear to expand
or complement our core business. Acquisitions involve risks that could cause the actual results of
any acquisitions we make to differ from our expectations. If we are not able to make acquisitions,
we may not be able to expand our business. For example:
|
|
|
We may experience difficulty in integrating and managing acquired
businesses successfully and in realizing anticipated economic,
operational and other benefits in a timely manner. The need to retain
existing clients, employees, and sales and distribution channels of an
acquired company and to integrate and manage differing corporate
cultures can also present significant risks. If we are unable to
successfully integrate and manage acquired businesses, we may incur
substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical or
financial problems. |
34
|
|
|
Our acquisition of Authorize.Net significantly reduced our
available cash and liquidity. In other future acquisitions,
we may issue equity securities that could be dilutive to our
shareholders or we may use our remaining cash, which may have
an adverse effect on our liquidity. We also may incur
additional debt and amortization expense related to
intangible assets as a result of acquisitions. This
additional debt and amortization expense, as well as the
potential impairment of any purchased goodwill, may
materially and adversely affect our business and operating
results. We may also be required to make continuing
investments in acquired products or technologies to bring
them to market, which may negatively affect our cash flows
and net income. We may also incur additional costs relating
to the integration, review and evaluation and enhancement of
our internal controls for Authorize.Net. In addition, we may
assume contingent liabilities that may be difficult to
estimate and costs and liabilities associated with assumed
litigation matters. |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions may divert managements attention from our
existing business and may damage our relationships with our
key clients and employees. |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions may also result in liabilities for claims not known at the time of acquisition as well as for assumed obligations. |
The Success of Our Business Strategy Is Dependent on Our Ability to Expand into New or
Complementary Markets.
As part of our business strategy, we are seeking to expand our business into new markets or
markets that are complementary to our existing core business. If we are not able to expand
successfully into new markets, our financial results and future prospects may be harmed. Our
ability to enter new markets depends on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
growth in our targeted markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide products and services to address the needs of those markets; and |
|
|
|
|
competition in those markets. |
If We Do Not Continue to Enhance Our Existing Products and Services, and Develop or Acquire
New Ones, We Will Not Be Able to Compete Effectively.
The industries in which we do business or intend to do business have been changing rapidly as
a result of increasing competition, technological advances, regulatory changes and evolving
industry practices and standards, and we expect these changes will continue. Current and potential
clients have also experienced significant changes as the result of consolidation among existing
industry participants and economic conditions. In addition, the business practices and technical
requirements of our clients are subject to changes that may require modifications to our products
and services. In order to remain competitive and successfully address the evolving needs of our
clients, we must commit a significant portion of our resources to:
|
|
|
identify and anticipate emerging technological and market trends affecting the markets in which we do business; |
|
|
|
|
enhance our current products and services in order to increase their functionality, features and
cost-effectiveness to clients that are seeking to control costs and to meet regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
develop or acquire new products and services that meet emerging client needs, such as products and services
for the online market; |
|
|
|
|
modify our products and services in response to changing business practices and technical requirements of our
clients, as well as to new regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
integrate our current and future products with third-party products; and |
|
|
|
|
create and maintain interfaces to changing client and third party systems. |
We must achieve these goals in a timely and cost-effective manner and successfully
market our new and enhanced products and services to clients. In the past, we have experienced
errors or delays in developing new products and services and in modifying or enhancing existing
products and services. If we are unable to expand or appropriately enhance or modify our products
and services quickly and efficiently, our business and operating results will be adversely
affected.
35
We Need to Continue to Improve or Implement our Procedures and Controls.
Requirements adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the passage of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require annual review and evaluation of our internal control
systems, and attestation of these systems by our registered independent public accounting firm. As
permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, management
determined that the internal control over financial reporting of Authorize.Net would be excluded
from the final 2004 internal control assessment. Our disclosure controls and procedures as of June
30, 2005 were not fully effective as of that date to provide a reasonable level of assurance of
reaching the Companys disclosure control objectives. We continue to evaluate such disclosure
controls and procedures, including with regard to Authorize.Net, which was acquired in March 2004,
and may modify, enhance or supplement them as appropriate in the future. Please refer to Part I.
Item 4. below for a discussion on controls and procedures. We need to periodically review our
internal control procedures, modify, enhance or supplement them as may be necessary and consider
the adequacy of the documentation of such procedures. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to maintain compliance with all of the new requirements. Any modifications, enhancements or
supplements to our internal control systems or in documentation of such internal control systems
and the internal control assessment of Authorize.Net could be costly to prepare or implement,
divert attention of management or finance staff, and may cause our operating expenses to increase
over the ensuing year.
Our Business May Be Harmed by Errors in Our Software.
The software that we develop and license to clients, and that we also use in providing our
transaction processing and call center services, is extremely complex and contains hundreds of
thousands of lines of computer code. Large, complex software systems such as ours are susceptible
to errors. The difficulty of preventing and detecting errors in our software is compounded by the
fact that we maintain multiple versions of our systems to meet the differing requirements of our
major clients, and must implement frequent modifications to these systems in response to these
clients evolving business policies and technical requirements. Our software design, development
and testing processes are not always adequate to detect errors in our software prior to its release
or commercial use. As a result, we have from time to time discovered, and may likely in the future
discover, errors in software that we have put into commercial use for our clients, including some
of our largest clients. Because of the complexity of our systems and the large volume of
transactions they process on a daily basis, we sometimes have not detected software errors until
after they have affected a significant number of transactions. Software errors can have the effect
of causing clients that utilize our products and services to fail to comply with their intended
credit or business policies, or to fail to comply with legal requirements, such as those under the
ECOA, FCRA, or GLBA.
Such errors, particularly if they affect a major client, can harm our business in several
ways, including the following:
|
|
|
we may suffer a loss of revenue if, due to software errors, we are temporarily unable to
provide products or services to our clients; |
|
|
|
|
we may not be paid for the products or services provided to a client that contain errors, or we
may be liable for losses or damages sustained by a client or its subscribers as a result of
such errors; |
|
|
|
|
we may incur additional unexpected expenses to correct errors in our software, or to fund
product development projects that we may undertake to minimize the occurrences of such errors
in the future; |
|
|
|
|
we may damage our relationships with clients or suffer a loss of reputation within our industry; |
|
|
|
|
we may become subject to litigation or regulatory scrutiny; and |
|
|
|
|
our clients may terminate or fail to renew their agreements with us or reduce the products and
services they purchase from us. |
Our errors and omissions insurance may not adequately compensate us for losses that
may occur due to software errors. It is also possible that such insurance might cease to be
available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Our Initiatives to Improve Our Software Design and Development Processes May Not Be Successful.
The development of our products has, in some cases, extended over a period of more than ten
years. This incremental development process has resulted in systems which are extremely complex.
Systems of the size and complexity of ours are inherently difficult to modify and maintain. We have
implemented and are also evaluating changes in our product development, testing and control
processes to improve the accuracy and timeliness of modifications that we make to our software,
including the frequent modifications that we must make in response to changes in the business
policies and technical requirements of our clients. We believe that our initiatives to implement a
new product architecture and to improve our product development, test and control processes will be
important to our future competitive position and success. If we are not successful in carrying out
these initiatives on a timely basis or in a manner that is acceptable to our clients, our business
and future prospects could be harmed.
36
We May Not Be Able to Successfully Manage Operational Changes.
Over the last several years, our operations have experienced rapid growth in some areas and
significant restructurings and cutbacks in others. These changes have created significant demands
on our executive, operational, development and financial personnel and other resources. If we
achieve future growth in our business, or if we are forced to make additional restructurings, we
may further strain our management, financial and other resources. Our future operating results will
depend on the ability of our officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and
to continue to improve our operational and financial controls and reporting systems. We cannot
ensure that we will be able to successfully manage the future changes in our business.
Our Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate.
Our operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly from quarter to
quarter. If our operating results fall below the expectations of investors or public market
analysts, the price of our common stock could fall dramatically. Our common stock price could also
fall dramatically if investors or public market analysts reduce their estimates of our future
quarterly operating results, whether as a result of information we disclose, or based on industry,
market or economic trends, or other factors.
Our revenues are difficult to forecast for a number of reasons:
|
|
|
Seasonal and retail trends affect our transaction revenues,
in both our Payment Processing and TDS businesses, as well as
our other products and services. Transaction revenues
historically have represented the majority of our total
revenues. As a result, our revenues can fluctuate. For
example, our revenues generally have been highest in the
fourth quarter of each calendar year, particularly in the
holiday shopping season between Thanksgiving and Christmas.
In addition, marketing initiatives undertaken by our clients
or their competitors may significantly affect the number of
transactions we process. |
|
|
|
|
The sales process for our products and services offered to
telecommunications clients is lengthy, sometimes exceeding
twenty-four months. The length of the sales process makes our
revenues difficult to predict. The delay of one or more large
orders, could cause our quarterly revenues to fall
substantially below expectations. |
|
|
|
|
Our consulting services revenues can fluctuate based on the
timing of product sales and projects we perform for our
clients. Many of our consulting engagements are of a
limited duration, so it can be difficult for us to forecast
consulting services revenues or staffing requirements
accurately more than a few months in advance. |
|
|
|
|
The factors described above under the headings If One or
More of Our Major Clients Stops Using Our Products or
Services or Changes the Combination of Products and
Services It Uses, Our Operating Results Would Suffer
Significantly, Certain of Our Revenues Are Uncertain
Because Our Clients May Reduce the Amounts of or Change the
Combination of Our Products or Services They Purchase and
Majority of Our Revenues Are Concentrated in the Wireless
Telecommunications Industry, Which Is Experiencing
Declining Growth Rates, Consolidation and Increasing
Pressure to Control Costs. |
Most of our expenses, particularly employee compensation, are relatively fixed. As a result,
even relatively small variations in the timing of our revenues may cause significant variations in
our quarterly operating results and may result in quarterly losses.
Our quarterly results may also vary due to the timing and extent of restructuring and other
charges that may occur in a given quarter.
As a result of these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of
operations are not necessarily meaningful. You should not rely on our quarterly results of
operations to predict our future performance.
We Face Significant Competition for a Limited Supply of Qualified Software Engineers, Consultants
and Sales and Marketing Personnel.
Our business depends on the services of skilled software engineers who can develop, maintain
and enhance our products, consultants who can undertake complex client projects and sales and
marketing personnel. In general, only highly qualified, highly educated personnel have the training
and skills necessary to perform these tasks successfully. In order to maintain the competitiveness
of our products and services and to meet client requirements, we need to attract, motivate and
retain a significant number of software engineers, consultants and sales and marketing personnel.
Qualified personnel such as these are in short supply and we face significant competition for these
employees, from not only our competitors but also clients and other enterprises. Other employers
may offer software engineers, consultants and sales and marketing personnel significantly greater
compensation and benefits or more attractive career paths than we are able to offer. Any failure on
our part to hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel would seriously
damage our business.
37
Changes in Management Could Affect Our Ability to Operate Our Business.
Our future success will depend to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts
of our executive officers. The loss of any of our executive officers could impair our ability to
successfully manage our current business or implement our planned business objectives and our
future operations may be adversely affected.
We Face Competition from a Broad and Increasing Range of Vendors.
The market for products and services offered to communications providers and participants in
online transactions is highly competitive and subject to rapid change. Each of these markets is
fragmented, and a number of companies currently offer one or more products or services competitive
with ours. We anticipate continued growth and the formation of new alliances in each of the markets
in which we compete, which will result in the entrance of new competitors in the future. We face
potential competition from several primary sources:
|
|
|
providers of online payment processing services, including
VeriSign, CyberSource Corporation, Plug & Pay Technologies,
Inc., PayPal, Inc. and LinkPoint International, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
software vendors that provide one or more customer
acquisition, customer relationship management and retention
or risk management solutions, including ECtel Ltd., TSI
Telecommunications Services Inc., Fair Isaac
Corporation, Magnum Software Systems, Inc., American
Management Systems, Incorporated and SLP Infoware; |
|
|
|
|
service providers that offer customer acquisition, customer
relationship management and retention, risk management or
authentication services in connection with other services,
including Choicepoint Inc., Visa U.S.A., Experian
Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., Lexis Nexis,
Trans Union, L.L.C., Schlumberger Sema plc and Amdocs Ltd; |
|
|
|
|
information technology departments within larger carriers
that have the ability to provide products and services that
are competitive with those we offer; |
|
|
|
|
information technology vendors that offer wireless and
internet software applications such as Oracle Corporation,
Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines
Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
consulting firms or systems integrators that may offer
competitive services or the ability to develop customized
solutions for customer acquisition and qualification,
customer relationship management and retention or risk
management, such as American Management Systems,
Incorporated, Accenture Ltd., BearingPoint, Inc.,
PeopleSoft, Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc. and Cap Gemini Ernst
& Young; |
|
|
|
|
a number of alternative technologies, including profilers,
personal identification numbers and authentication,
provided by companies such as Verizon Communications, Inc.,
Authentix Network Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
vendors that provide or resell products and services in the
voice conferencing market such as Spectel, Inc., Polycom
Inc., Raindance Communications, Inc., Ptek Holdings, Inc.,
and the major worldwide telecommunications providers such
as AT&T, Sprint, and Global Crossing Limited. |
Because competitors can easily penetrate one or more of our markets, we anticipate
additional competition from other established and new companies. In addition, competition may
intensify as competitors establish cooperative relationships among themselves or alliances with
others.
Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing,
technical and other competitive resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to
adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client requirements, or may be
able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services. In
addition, in order to meet client requirements, we must often work cooperatively with companies
that are, in other circumstances, competitors. The need for us to work cooperatively with such
companies may limit our ability to compete aggressively with those companies in other
circumstances.
Our Success Depends in Part on Our Ability to Obtain Patents for, or Otherwise Protect, Our
Proprietary Technologies.
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, license and
confidentiality agreements, and software security measures to protect our proprietary rights. Much
of our know-how and other proprietary technology is not covered by patent or similar protection,
and in many cases cannot be so protected. If we cannot obtain patent or other protection for our
proprietary software and other proprietary intellectual property rights, other companies could more
easily enter our markets and compete successfully against us.
38
We have a limited number of patents in the U.S. and abroad, and have pending applications for
additional patents, but we cannot be certain that any additional patents will be issued on those
applications, that any of our current or future patents will protect our business or technology
against competitors that develop similar technology or products or services or provide us with a
competitive advantage, or that others will not claim rights in our patents or our proprietary
technologies.
Patents issued and patent applications filed relating to products used in the wireless
telecommunications and payment processing industry are numerous and it may be the case that current
and potential competitors and other third parties have filed or will file applications for, or have
received or will receive, patents or obtain additional proprietary rights relating to products used
or proposed to be used by us. We may not be aware of all patents or patent applications that may
materially affect our ability to make, use or sell any current or future products or services.
The laws of some countries in which our products are licensed do not protect our products and
intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. We generally enter into
non-disclosure agreements with our employees and clients and restrict access to, and distribution
of, our proprietary information. Nevertheless, we may be unable to deter misappropriation of our
proprietary information or detect unauthorized use of and take appropriate steps to enforce our
intellectual property rights. Our competitors also may independently develop technologies that are
substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.
Our Foreign Operations Subject Us to Risks and Concerns Which Could Negatively Affect Out Business
Overall.
We have operations outside the U.S. at our call center located in Liverpool, Nova Scotia,
Canada. In addition to the risks generally associated with operations in the U.S., operations in
foreign countries present us with additional risks, including the following:
|
|
|
the imposition of financial and operational controls and regulatory restrictions by foreign governments; |
|
|
|
|
the need to comply with a wide variety of complex U.S. and foreign import and export laws and treaties; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, and |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in managing staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations. |
Our Business Could Require Additional Financing.
Our future business activities, including our operation of Authorize.Net, the development or
acquisition of new or enhanced products and services, the acquisition of additional computer and
network equipment, the costs of compliance with government regulations and future expansions
including acquisitions will require us to make significant capital expenditures. If our available
cash resources prove to be insufficient, because of unanticipated expenses, revenue shortfalls or
otherwise, we may need to seek additional financing or curtail our expansion activities. If we
obtain equity financing for any reason, our existing stockholders may experience dilution in their
investments. If we obtain debt financing, our business could become subject to restrictions that
affect our operations or increase the level of risk in our business. It is also possible that, if
we need additional financing, we will not be able to obtain it on acceptable terms, or at all.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES.
The
market risk exposure inherent in our financial instruments and consolidated
financial position represents the potential losses arising from adverse changes in interest rates.
We are exposed to such interest rate risk primarily in our significant investment in cash
and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid instruments which
consist primarily of money market accounts, purchased with remaining maturities of three months or
less. Our short term investments also include debt securities maturing in one year or
less that are classified as available for sale. These investments are
carried at fair value. We do not execute transactions in or hold derivative financial instruments for trading or
hedging purposes.
The amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities is adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Realized gains and losses, and declines in value
judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale debt securities, if any, are included in
interest income, net. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
Interest and dividends on securities are included in interest income, net.
Market risk for cash and cash equivalents is estimated as the potential change in the fair
value of the assets or obligations resulting from a hypothetical ten percent adverse change in
interest rates, which would not have been significant to our financial position or
results of operations during 2005.
We
are not subject to any material market risk associated with foreign currency
exchange rates.
39
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of June 30, 2005. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based on this
evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
June 30, 2005, our
disclosure controls and procedures were not fully effective as of that date to provide a reasonable
level of assurance of reaching our disclosure control objectives, for the reasons
described in the following paragraph. We excluded
Authorize.Net from our 2004 internal
control assessment, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We continue to evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures, including
with respect to Authorize.Net, and may modify, enhance or supplement them as appropriate in the
future.
Subsequent to June 30, 2005, we became aware of a material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards Auditing Standard No. 2
defines a material weakness as a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant
deficiencies, that results in there being a more than remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
In early May 2005, our corporate controller voluntarily resigned. Although we immediately
began a search for a person to fill the position, our new corporate controller did not commence
employment until after June 30, 2005. As a result, certain of our financial statement close processes did
not operate as designed which resulted in adjustments to correct our accounting for the gain on the
sale of the INS business. Further adjustments to reflect changes to tax laws which were not considered in our initial income
tax accounting related to our continuing operations were also
required to properly reflect our income tax provision. Such adjustments were material to our June 30, 2005 financial statements. To
address this issue going forward, we have a new corporate controller, and we will reinforce the
protocols relating to our financial statement close processes. The proper accounting for the gain
on the sale of INS and the matters related to income tax accounting were resolved prior to the
public release of our financial results for the second quarter of 2005 and does not affect any
reported results.
The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various
inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such
inherent limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and
procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material
information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.
Except for the departure of the corporate controller, there has not been any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In 2001, Net MoneyIN, Inc. brought a patent infringement suit in the United States District
Court for the District of Arizona, entitled Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., et al., Case No.
CIV 01-441 TUC RCC. Defendants in this case include InfoSpace, Inc. and E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.
On March 31, 2004, we acquired Authorize.Net from InfoSpace, Inc. In the purchase agreement,
we agreed to indemnify and defend InfoSpace, Inc. against this lawsuit. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc. was a
reseller of services provided by Authorize.Net. The reseller agreement between the parties
contains provisions regarding indemnification from Authorize.Net for claims against the reseller
related to services provided under that agreement. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has also
requested indemnification, including defense costs, from Authorize.Net based on certain contracts
with Authorize.Net. Neither Lightbridge nor Authorize.Net is a party to the Net MoneyIN lawsuit,
but because we are defending the litigation and providing indemnification to some of the
defendants, we have potential exposure to liability (in an undetermined amount) as if we were
parties to the lawsuit. As with all major litigation, such liability could be significant and
could, if the result of the lawsuit is adverse to us, materially adversely affect our business,
operations and financial condition. We and Authorize.Net may be added as parties at a later date.
The lawsuit alleges infringement of certain patents involving payment processing over computer
networks, and names a variety of defendants, including payment processing gateway providers and
banks. Net MoneyIN alleges that numerous products or services infringe its patents, including the
Authorize.Net Payment Gateway Service and eCheck.Net service, and seeks treble damages, permanent
injunctive relief, attorneys fees and costs. Injunctive relief adverse to us could materially
adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.
40
The defendants have denied the allegations of the plaintiff and have counterclaimed, seeking a
declaration that plaintiffs patents have not been infringed and are invalid. The litigation is
bifurcated, with separate liability and damages phases. The period designated for fact discovery
during the liability phase has concluded. The court held a claim construction hearing on June
29-30, 2005, but has not yet issued a ruling construing the patent claims, and no liability-phase
trial date has been set. We incurred legal expenses in 2004 of approximately $200,000 in
connection with the defense of this lawsuit following our acquisition of Authorize.Net, and expect
to incur defense costs of approximately $1.2 million to $1.5 million in 2005. We intend to
vigorously pursue our defenses to the lawsuit.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Stock
Repurchases On October 4, 2001, we announced that our board of directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 2 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate
price of up to $20 million. The shares may be purchased from time to time on or after October 8,
2001, depending on market conditions. On April 23, 2003, the board approved an expansion of the
plan to authorize us to purchase up to 4 million shares of our common stock at
an aggregate price of up to $40 million through
September 26, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, we had purchased approximately 2.5 million shares at a total cost of approximately $17.9
million since the inception of its repurchase program. There were no repurchases during the first
six months of 2005. The maximum number of shares that could yet be purchased under the plan was
1,452,862 at June 30, 2005.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On
June 20, 2005, we held a Special Meeting in Lieu of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to vote upon the proposal to Elect Two Directors:
|
a) |
|
To re-elect Robert E. Donahue to serve as a Class III
director for a three-year term beginning on June 20, 2005 and
ending at our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders; and |
|
|
b) |
|
To re-elect Kevin C. Melia to serve as a Class III director
for a three-year term beginning on June 20, 2005 and ending
at our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. |
The number of votes cast for and against, as well as the number of votes withheld or
abstentions (including broker non-votes), on the above proposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTES |
|
VOTES |
|
ABSTENTI |
PROPOSAL |
|
VOTES FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
WITHHELD |
|
ONS |
a) For Robert E. Donahue |
|
|
25,666,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
b) For Kevin C. Melia |
|
|
25,170,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
10.1*
|
|
Form of Executive Retention Agreement |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated May 19, 2005 between Lightbridge, Inc. and Lucent Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.3**
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 25, 2005 by and between VeriSign, Inc. the Company. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Robert E. Donahue dated August 9, 2005 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Timothy C. OBrien dated August 9, 2005 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Robert E. Donahue and Timothy C. OBrien dated August 9, 2005 (furnished but
not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission) |
|
|
|
*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2005. |
|
|
|
**
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2005. |
41
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIGHTBRIDGE, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2005
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy C. OBrien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C. OBrien |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Administration, |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Chief Accounting
Officer) |
42