e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
Commission file number 1-11625
Pentair, Inc.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-0907434
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification number)
|
|
|
|
5500 Wayzata Boulevard,
Suite 800,
Golden Valley, Minnesota
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
55416-1259
(Zip
code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(763) 545-1730
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Shares,
$0.162/3
par value
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
PART III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing
price of $34.19 per share as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange on July 1, 2006 (the last day of Registrants
most recently completed second quarter): $3,256,840,095
The number of shares outstanding of Registrants only class
of common stock on February 16, 2007 was 99,893,254.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts of the Registrants definitive proxy statement for
its annual meeting to be held on May 3, 2007, are
incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K
in response to Part III, ITEM 10, 11, 12, 13 and
14.
Pentair,
Inc.
Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2006
2
PART I
GENERAL
Pentair, Inc. is a focused diversified industrial manufacturing
company comprised of two operating segments: Water and Technical
Products. Our Water Group is a global leader in providing
innovative products and systems used worldwide in the movement,
storage, treatment, and enjoyment of water. Our Technical
Products Group, formerly referred to as our Enclosures Group, is
a leader in the global enclosures and thermal management
markets, designing and manufacturing standard, modified and
custom enclosures that house and protect sensitive electronics
and electrical components; thermal management products; and
accessories.
Pentair
Strategy
Our strategy is to achieve benchmark Return on Invested Capital
(ROIC) performance for diversified industrial manufacturing
companies by:
|
|
|
building operational excellence through the Pentair Integrated
Management System (PIMS) consisting of strategy deployment, lean
enterprise, and IGNITE, which is our process to drive organic
growth;
|
|
driving long-term growth in sales, income and cash flows,
through internal growth initiatives and acquisitions;
|
|
developing new products and enhancing existing products;
|
|
penetrating attractive growth markets, particularly
international;
|
|
expanding multi-channel distribution; and
|
|
proactively managing our business portfolio, including
consideration of new business platforms.
|
Pentair
Financial Objectives
Our long-term financial objectives are to:
|
|
|
Achieve 5-8% annual organic sales growth, plus acquisitions
|
|
Achieve benchmark financial performance:
|
|
|
|
EBIT Margin
|
|
14%
|
Return on Invested
Capital (ROIC)(pre-tax)
|
|
20%
|
Free Cash Flow (FCF)
|
|
100% conversion of net income
|
EPS Growth
|
|
10+% (sales growth plus margin
expansion)
|
Debt/Total Capital
|
|
£40%
|
|
|
|
Achieve 5% annual productivity improvement on core business cost
|
Unless the context otherwise indicates, references herein to
Pentair, the Company, and such words as
we, us, and our include
Pentair, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Pentair is a Minnesota
corporation that was incorporated in 1966.
BUSINESS
AND PRODUCTS
Business segment and geographical financial information is
contained in ITEM 8, Note 14 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
WATER
GROUP
Our Water Group is a global leader in providing innovative
products and systems used worldwide in the movement, storage,
treatment, and enjoyment of water. Our Water Group offers a
broad array of products and systems to multiple markets and
customers. The core competencies of our Water Group center
around flow and filtration. We have identified a target market
totaling $60 billion, with our current primary focus on
three markets: Pump (approximately 40% of group sales),
Filtration (approximately 30% of group sales), and
Pool & Spa (approximately 30% of group sales).
3
Pump
Market
We address the Pump market with products ranging from light duty
diaphragm pumps to high-flow turbine pumps and solid handling
pumps designed for water and wastewater applications, and
agricultural spraying, as well as pressure tanks for residential
applications. Applications for our broad range of products
include pumps for residential and municipal wells, water
treatment, wastewater solids handling, pressure boosting, engine
cooling, fluid delivery, circulation, and transfer.
Brand names for the Pump market include
STA-RITE®,
Myers®,
Aurora®,
Hydromatic®,
Fairbanks
Morsetm,
Flotec®,
Hypro®,
Water
Ace®,
Berkeley®,
Aermotortm,
Layne &
Bowler®,
Simer®,
Verti-line®,
Sherwood®,
SherTech®,
Diamond®,
FoamPro®,
Ongatm,
Nocchitm,
Shur-Dri®,
SHURflo®,
Edwards®,
JUNG
PUMPEN®,
oxynaut®,
and
JUNG®.
Filtration
Market
We address the Filtration market with control valves, tanks,
filter systems, filter cartridges, pressure vessels, and
specialty dispensing pumps providing flow solutions for specific
end-user market applications including residential, commercial,
foodservice, industrial, recreation vehicles, marine, and
aviation. Filtration products are used in the manufacture of
water softeners; filtration, deionization, and desalination
systems; and industrial, commercial and residential water
filtration applications.
Brand names for the Filtration market include
Everpure®,
SHURflo®,
Fleck®,
CodeLine®,
Structuraltm,
Pentek®,
SIATAtm,
WellMatetm,
American
Plumber®,
Armor®,
OMNIFILTER®,
Park
Internationaltm,
Fibredynetm,
and Krystil
Klear®.
Pool &
Spa Market
We address the Pool & Spa market with a complete line
of commercial and residential pool/spa equipment and accessories
including pumps, filters, heaters, lights, automatic controls,
automatic pool cleaners, commercial deck equipment, barbeque
deck equipment, aquatic pond products and accessories, pool tile
and interior finishing surfaces, maintenance equipment,
spa/jetted tub hydrotherapy fittings, and pool/spa accessories.
Applications for our pool products include commercial and
residential pool and spa construction, maintenance, repair, and
service.
Brand names for the Pool & Spa market include Pentair
Pool
Products®,
Pentair Water Pool and
Spatm,
National Pool Tile
Group®,
Pentair
Aquatics®,
STA-RITE®,
Paragon
Aquatics®,
Pentair Spa &
Bathtm,
Kreepy
Krauly®,
Compool®,
WhisperFlo®,
PoolShark®,
Legendtm,
Rainbowtm,
Ultra
Jet®,
Vico®,
FIBERworks®,
IntelliTouchtm,
and
Acu-Trol®.
Customers
Our Water Group distributes its products through wholesale
distributors, retail distributors, original equipment
manufacturers, and home centers. Information regarding
significant customers in our Water Group is contained in
ITEM 8, Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal demand in a number of markets within our
Water Group. End-user demand for pool equipment follows warm
weather trends and is at seasonal highs from April to August.
The magnitude of the sales spike is partially mitigated by
employing some advance sales early buy programs
(generally including extended payment terms
and/or
additional discounts). Demand for residential and agricultural
water systems is also impacted by weather patterns, particularly
by heavy flooding and droughts.
Competition
Our Water Group faces numerous domestic and international
competitors, some of which have substantially greater resources.
Consolidation, globalization, and outsourcing are continuing
trends in the water industry. Competition in commercial and
residential pump markets focuses on brand names, product
performance, quality, and price. While home center and national
retailers are important for residential lines of water and
wastewater pumps, they are much less important for commercial
pumps. For municipal pumps, competition
4
focuses on performance to meet required specifications, service,
and price. Competition in water treatment and filtration
components focuses on product performance and design, quality,
delivery, and price. For pool and spa equipment, competition
focuses on brand names, product performance, quality, and price.
We compete by offering a wide variety of innovative and
high-quality products, which are competitively priced. We
believe our distribution channels and reputation for quality
also contribute to our continuing industry penetration.
TECHNICAL
PRODUCTS GROUP
Our Technical Products Group is a leader in the global
enclosures and thermal management markets, designing and
manufacturing standard, modified, and custom enclosures that
house and protect sensitive electronics and electrical
components; thermal management products; and accessories. We
have identified a target market of $30 billion. Our
Technical Products Group focuses its business portfolio on four
primary industries: Commercial and Industrial (55% of group
sales), Telecom and Datacom (25% of group sales), Electronics
(15% of group sales), and Networking (5% of group sales). The
primary brand names for the Technical Products Group are:
Hoffman®,
Schroff®,
Pentair Electronic
Packagingtm,
Taunustm,
McLean®,
Electronic
Solutionstm,
Birtchertm,
and Aspen
Motiontm. Products
and related accessories of the Technical Products Group include
metallic and composite enclosures, cabinets, cases, subracks,
backplanes, heat exchangers, and blowers. Applications served
include industrial machinery, data communications, networking,
telecommunications, test and measurement, automotive, medical,
security, defense, and general electronics.
Customers
Our Technical Products Group distributes its products through
electrical and data contractors, electrical and electronic
components distributors, and original equipment manufacturers.
Information regarding significant customers in our Technical
Products Group is contained in ITEM 8, Note 14 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
Seasonality
Our Technical Products Group is not significantly impacted by
seasonal demand fluctuations.
Competition
Competition in the technical products markets can be intense,
particularly in telecom and datacom markets, where product
design, prototyping, global supply, price competition, and
customer service are significant factors. Our Technical Products
Group has continued to focus on cost control and improving
profitability. Recent growth in the Technical Products Group is
a result of acquisitions, overall market growth, new product
development, continued channel penetration, growth in targeted
market segments, and geographic expansion. Consolidation,
globalization, and outsourcing are visible trends in the
technical products marketplace and typically play to the
strengths of a large and globally positioned supplier. We
believe our Technical Products Group has the broadest array of
enclosures products available for commercial and industrial uses.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
Growth
of our business
We continually look at each of our businesses to determine
whether they fit with our strategic vision. Our primary focus is
on businesses with strong fundamentals and growth opportunities,
especially in international markets. We seek growth through
product and service innovation, market expansion, and
acquisitions. Acquisitions have played an important part in the
growth of our business, and we expect acquisitions will continue
to be an important part of our future growth.
Acquisitions
On December 11, 2006 we entered into an agreement to
acquire all of the share capital of Jung Pumpen GmbH, a
German-based manufacturer of municipal and residential
wastewater pumps and related products, subject to German Federal
Cartel Office approval. The acquisition was completed on
February 2, 2007 for approximately $227 million, net
of cash acquired of $13 million, excluding transaction
costs and subject to a post-closing net asset value adjustment.
5
On April 12, 2006, we acquired, as part of our Water Group,
the assets of Geyers Manufacturing & Design Inc.
and FTA Filtration, Inc. (together Krystil Klear),
two privately-held companies, for $15.5 million in cash.
Krystil Klear expands our industrial filtration product offering
to include a full range of steel and stainless steel tanks which
house filtration solutions. Goodwill recorded as part of the
initial purchase price allocation was $9.2 million, all of
which is tax deductible. We continue to evaluate the purchase
price allocation for the Krystil Klear acquisition, including
intangible assets, contingent liabilities, plant rationalization
costs, and property, plant and equipment. We expect to revise
the purchase price allocation as better information becomes
available.
During 2006, we completed several other small acquisitions
totaling $14.2 million in cash and notes payable, adding to
both our Water and Technical Products Groups. Total goodwill
recorded as part of the initial purchase price allocations was
$7.9 million, of which $2.9 million is tax deductible.
We continue to evaluate the purchase price allocations for these
acquisitions and expect to revise the purchase price allocations
as better information becomes available.
On December 1, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Technical
Products Group, the McLean Thermal Management, Aspen Motion
Technologies, and Electronic Solutions businesses from APW, Ltd.
(collectively, Thermal) for $143.9 million,
including a cash payment of $140.6 million and transaction
costs of $3.3 million. These businesses provide thermal
management solutions and integration services to the
telecommunications, data communications, medical, and security
markets. Final goodwill recorded as part of the purchase price
allocation was $71.1 million, all of which is tax
deductible. Final identifiable intangible assets acquired as
part of the acquisition were $45.6 million, including
definite-lived intangibles, such as proprietary technology and
customer relationships, of $23.1 million with a weighted
average amortization period of approximately 12 years.
On February 23, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Water
Group, certain assets of Delta Environmental Products, Inc. and
affiliates (collectively, DEP), a privately-held
company, for $10.3 million, including a cash payment of
$10.0 million, transaction costs of $0.2 million, and
debt assumed of $0.1 million. The DEP product line
addressees the water and wastewater markets. Final goodwill
recorded as part of the purchase price allocation was
$7.2 million, all of which is tax deductible.
Effective July 31, 2004, we completed the acquisition of
all of the shares of capital stock of WICOR, Inc.
(WICOR) from Wisconsin Energy Corporation
(WEC) for $874.7 million, including a cash
payment of $871.1 million, transaction costs of
$11.2 million, and debt assumed of $21.6 million, less
a favorable final purchase price adjustment of
$14.0 million and less cash acquired of $15.2 million.
This includes an additional $0.4 million in transaction
costs recorded in the first three quarters of 2005. WICOR
manufactured water system, filtration, and pool equipment
products primarily under the
STA-RITE®,
SHURflo®
and
Hypro®
brands.
Also refer to ITEM 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis, and ITEM 8, Note 2 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
Discontinued
operations/divestitures
Effective after the close of business on October 2, 2004,
we completed the sale of our former Tools Group to The
Black & Decker Corporation (BDK). In
January 2006, pursuant to the purchase agreement for the sale of
our former Tools Group, we completed the repurchase of a
manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China from BDK for
approximately $5.7 million. We recorded no gain or loss on
the repurchase. In March 2006, we completed an outstanding net
asset value arbitration with BDK relating to the purchase price
for the sale of our former Tools Group. The decision by the
arbitrator constituted a final resolution of all disputes
between BDK and us regarding the net asset value. We paid the
final net asset value purchase price adjustment pursuant to the
purchase agreement of $16.1 million plus interest of
$1.1 million in March 2006, resulting in an incremental
pre-tax loss on disposal of discontinued operations of
$3.4 million, or $1.6 million net of tax. In the third
quarter of 2006, we resolved a prior year tax item that resulted
in a $1.4 million income tax benefit related to our former
Tools Group.
6
In 2001, we completed the sale of our former Service Equipment
businesses (Century Mfg. Co./Lincoln Automotive Company) to
Clore Automotive, LLC. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we
reported an additional loss from discontinued operations of
$2.9 million related to exiting the remaining two
facilities. In March 2006, we exited a leased facility from our
former Service Equipment business resulting in a net cash
outflow of $2.2 million and an immaterial gain from
disposition.
Also refer to ITEM 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis, and ITEM 8, Note 3 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
INFORMATION
REGARDING ALL BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Backlog
Our backlog of orders as of December 31 by segment
was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ change
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
238,191
|
|
|
$
|
165,737
|
|
|
$
|
72,454
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
Technical Products
|
|
|
100,205
|
|
|
|
106,587
|
|
|
|
(6,382
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
338,396
|
|
|
$
|
272,324
|
|
|
$
|
66,072
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
The $72.5 million increase in Water Group backlog was
primarily due to better than anticipated fourth quarter 2006
early buy orders in our pool business that are scheduled to ship
in the first quarter of 2007, growth in Asian markets, and
increased backlog for pumps used in municipal market
applications. The $6.4 million decrease in Technical
Products Group backlog reflected a decline in orders from the
telecommunications market and data communications projects which
have reached end-of-life. Due to the relatively short
manufacturing cycle and general industry practice for the
majority of our businesses, backlog, which typically represents
approximately 30 days of shipments, is not deemed to be a
significant item. A substantial portion of our revenues result
from orders received and product sold in the same month. We
expect that most of our backlog at December 31, 2006 will
be filled in 2007.
Research
and development
We conduct research and development activities in our own
facilities, which consist primarily of the development of new
products, product applications, and manufacturing processes.
Research and development expenditures during 2006, 2005, and
2004 were $58.1 million, $46.0 million, and
$31.5 million, respectively.
Environmental
Environmental matters are discussed in ITEM 3, ITEM 7,
and in ITEM 8, Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
Raw
materials
The principal materials used in the manufacturing of our
products are electric motors, mild steel, stainless steel,
electronic components, plastics (resins, fiberglass, epoxies),
and paint (powder and liquid). In addition to the purchase of
raw materials, we purchase some finished goods for distribution
through our sales channels.
The materials used in the various manufacturing processes are
purchased on the open market, and the majority are available
through multiple sources and are in adequate supply. We have not
experienced any significant work stoppages to-date due to
shortages of materials. We have certain long-term commitments,
principally price commitments, for the purchase of various
component parts and raw materials and believe that it is
unlikely that any of these agreements would be terminated
prematurely. Alternate sources of supply at competitive prices
are available for most materials for which long-term commitments
exist, and we believe that the termination of any of these
commitments would not have a material adverse effect on
operations.
Certain commodities, such as metals and resin, are subject to
market and duty-driven price fluctuations. We manage these
fluctuations through several mechanisms, including long-term
agreements with escalator/de-escalator clauses. Prices for raw
materials, such as metals and resins, may continue to trend
higher in the future.
7
Intellectual
property
Patents, non-compete agreements, proprietary technologies,
customer relationships, trade marks, trade names, and brand
names are important to our business. However, we do not regard
our business as being materially dependent upon any single
patent, non-compete agreement, proprietary technology, customer
relationship, trade mark, trade name, or brand name.
Patents, patent applications, and license agreements will expire
or terminate over time by operation of law, in accordance with
their terms or otherwise. We do not expect the termination of
patents, patent applications, and license agreements to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we employed approximately
14,800 people worldwide. Total employees in the United
States were approximately 9,100, of whom approximately 900 are
represented by six different trade unions having collective
bargaining agreements. Generally, labor relations have been
satisfactory.
Captive
Insurance Subsidiary
We insure certain general and product liability, property,
workers compensation, and automobile liability risks
through our regulated wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary,
Penwald Insurance Company (Penwald). Reserves for
policy claims are established based on actuarial projections of
ultimate losses. Accruals with respect to liabilities insured by
third parties, such as liabilities arising from acquired
businesses, pre-Penwald liabilities and those of certain foreign
operations, are established without regard to the availability
of insurance.
Matters pertaining to Penwald are discussed in ITEM 3 and
ITEM 8, Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, included in this
Form 10-K.
Available
information
We make available free of charge (other than an investors
own Internet access charges) through our Internet website
(http://www.pentair.com) our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reports
of beneficial ownership filed by our directors and executive
officers pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 are also available on our website. We are
not including the information contained on our website as part
of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors and
warnings before making an investment decision. If any of the
risks described below actually occur, our business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, the price of our
securities could decline and you could lose all or part of your
investment. You should also refer to other information set forth
in this document.
Demand
for our products will be affected by general economic
conditions.
We compete globally in varied markets. Among these, the most
significant are North American industrial and commercial markets
(for both the Water and Technical Products Groups) and the North
American residential market (for the Water Group). Economic
conditions in the United States affect the robustness of our
North American markets; important factors include the overall
strength of the economy and our customers confidence in
the economy; industrial and municipal capital spending; the
strength of the residential and commercial real estate markets;
the age of existing housing stock; unemployment rates;
availability of consumer financing; and, interest rates. New
construction for residential housing and home improvement
activity fell dramatically in 2006, which reduced revenue growth
in our Water Group, especially in the pool and spa and pump
markets we address. We cannot give any assurance that we will
not continue to encounter
8
weakness in these markets. Further, while we attempt to minimize
our exposure to economic or market fluctuations by serving a
balanced mix of end markets and geographic regions, we cannot
assure you that a significant or sustained downturn in a
specific end market or geographic region would not have a
material adverse effect on us.
Our
businesses operate in highly competitive markets, so we may be
forced to cut prices or to incur additional costs.
Our businesses generally face substantial competition in each of
their respective markets. Competition may force us to cut prices
or to incur additional costs to remain competitive. We compete
on the basis of product design, quality, availability,
performance, customer service and price. Present or future
competitors may have greater financial, technical or other
resources which could put us at a disadvantage in the affected
business or businesses. We cannot assure you that these and
other factors will not have a material adverse effect on our
future results of operations.
Our
inability to sustain consistent organic growth could adversely
affect our financial performance.
In 2006 and 2005, our organic growth was generated in part from
expanding international sales, entering new distribution
channels, and introducing new products. To grow more rapidly
than our end markets, we will have to continue to expand our
geographic reach, further diversify our distribution channels,
continue to introduce new products, and increase sales of
existing products to our customer base. We may not be able to
successfully meet those challenges, which could adversely affect
our ability to sustain consistent organic growth. If we are
unable to sustain consistent organic growth, we will be less
likely to meet our stated revenue growth targets, which together
with any resulting impact on our net income growth, would likely
adversely affect the market price of our stock.
Our
inability to complete or successfully complete and integrate
acquisitions could adversely affect our financial
performance.
A significant percentage of our net sales growth in 2006 and
2005 was generated as a result of acquisitions completed in 2004
or subsequent periods, including our acquisition of WICOR and
the Thermal businesses. We may not be able to sustain this level
of growth from acquisition activity in the future. We intend to
continue to evaluate strategic acquisitions primarily in our
current business segments, and we may consider acquisitions
outside of these segments as well. Our ability to expand through
acquisitions is subject to various risks, including the
following:
|
|
|
increased competition for acquisitions, especially in the water
industry;
|
|
|
higher acquisition prices;
|
|
|
lack of suitable acquisition candidates in targeted product or
market areas;
|
|
|
diversion of management time and attention to acquisitions and
acquired businesses;
|
|
|
inability to integrate acquired businesses effectively or
profitably; and
|
|
|
inability to achieve anticipated synergies or other benefits
from acquisitions.
|
Acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results, particularly in the fiscal quarters
immediately following the acquisitions, while we attempt to
integrate operations of the acquired businesses into our
operations. Once integrated, acquired operations may not achieve
the levels of profitability originally anticipated.
Material
cost and other inflation could adversely affect our results of
operations.
We are experiencing material cost and other inflation in a
number of our businesses. We are striving for greater
productivity improvements and implementing selective increases
in selling prices to help mitigate cost increases in base
materials such as metals and other costs such as pension, health
care and insurance. We also
9
are continuing to implement our excellence in operations
initiatives in order to continuously reduce our costs. We cannot
assure you, however, that these actions will be successful in
managing our costs or increasing our productivity. Continued
cost inflation or failure of our initiatives to generate cost
savings or improve productivity may negatively impact our
results of operations.
Seasonality
of sales and weather conditions may adversely affect our
financial results.
We experience seasonal demand in a number of markets within our
Water Group. End-user demand for pool equipment follows warm
weather trends and is at seasonal highs from April to August.
The magnitude of the sales spike is partially mitigated by
employing some advance sales early buy programs
(generally including extended payment terms
and/or
additional discounts). Demand for residential and agricultural
water systems is also impacted by weather patterns, particularly
by heavy flooding and droughts. We cannot assure you that
seasonality and weather conditions will not have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations.
Intellectual
property challenges may hinder product development and
marketing.
Patents, non-compete agreements, proprietary technologies,
customer relationships, trade marks, trade names, and brand
names are important to our business. Intellectual property
protection, however, may not preclude competitors from
developing products similar to ours or from challenging our
names or products. Over the past few years, we have noticed an
increasing tendency for participants in our markets to use
conflicts over and challenges to intellectual property as a
means to compete. Patent and trademark challenges increase our
costs to develop, engineer and market our products.
Our
results of operations may be negatively impacted by
litigation.
Our business exposes us to potential litigation, especially
product liability suits that are inherent in the design,
manufacture, and sale of our products, such as the Horizon
litigation discussed in ITEM 3 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
While we currently maintain what we believe to be suitable
product liability insurance, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to maintain this insurance on acceptable terms or that
this insurance will provide adequate protection against
potential liabilities. In addition, we self-insure a portion of
product liability claims. A series of successful claims against
us could materially and adversely affect our product reputation,
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
The
availability and cost of capital could have a negative impact on
our continued growth.
Our plans to continue growth in our chosen markets will require
additional capital for future acquisitions, capital expenditures
for existing businesses, growth of working capital, and
continued international and regional expansion. In the past, we
have financed our growth primarily through debt financing. Any
significant future acquisitions will require us to expand our
debt financing resources or to issue equity securities. Our
financial results may be adversely affected if interest costs
under our debt financings are higher than the income generated
by acquisitions or other internal growth. In addition, future
acquisitions could be dilutive to your equity investment if we
issue additional stock to fund acquisitions. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to issue equity securities or to
obtain future debt financing at favorable terms. Without
sufficient financing, we will not be able to pursue our growth
strategy, which will limit our growth and revenues in the future.
Our
international operations are subject to foreign market and
currency fluctuation risks.
We expect the percentage of our sales outside of North America
to increase in the future. Over the past few years, the
economies of some of the foreign countries in which we do
business have had slower growth than the U.S. economy. The
European Union currently accounts for the majority of our
foreign sales and income, in which our most significant European
market is Germany. In addition, we have a significant and
growing business in the Asia-Pacific area. We cannot predict how
changing market conditions in these regions will impact our
financial results.
10
We are also exposed to the risk of fluctuation of foreign
currency exchange rates which may affect our financial results.
As of December 31, 2006, we held immaterial positions in
foreign exchange-forward contracts.
We are
exposed to political, economic and other risks that arise from
operating a multinational business.
Sales outside of North America, including export sales from
North American businesses, accounted for approximately 23% of
our net sales in 2006. Further, most of our businesses obtain
some raw materials and finished goods from foreign suppliers.
Accordingly, our business is subject to the political, economic
and other risks that are inherent in operating in numerous
countries. These risks include:
|
|
|
the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
receivables through foreign legal systems;
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
tax rates in certain foreign countries that exceed those in the
U.S. and the imposition of withholding requirements on
foreign earnings;
|
|
|
the possibility of terrorist action against us or our operations;
|
|
|
the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or other
restrictions;
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations in
non-U.S. labor
markets;
|
|
|
the protection of intellectual property in foreign countries may
be more difficult;
|
|
|
required compliance with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations; and
|
|
|
changes in general economic and political conditions in
countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets.
|
Our business success depends in part on our ability to
anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks. We
cannot assure you that these and other factors will not have a
material adverse effect on our international operations or on
our business as a whole.
We are
exposed to potential environmental liabilities and
litigation.
Compliance with environmental regulations could require us to
satisfy environmental liabilities, increase the cost of
manufacturing our products or otherwise adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. We are
subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and
regulations governing public and worker health and safety and
the indoor and outdoor environment. Any violations of these laws
by us could cause us to incur unanticipated liabilities that
could harm our operating results and cause our business to
suffer. We are also required to comply with various
environmental laws and maintain permits, some of which are
subject to discretionary renewal from time to time, for many of
our businesses, and we could suffer if we are unable to renew
existing permits or to obtain any additional permits that we may
require.
We have been named as defendants, targets, or potentially
responsible parties (PRP) in a number of
environmental
clean-ups
relating to our current or former business units. We have
disposed of a number of businesses in recent years and, in
certain cases, we have retained responsibility and potential
liability for certain environmental obligations. We have
received claims for indemnification from certain purchasers. We
may be named as a PRP at other sites in the future for existing
business units, as well as both divested and acquired businesses.
We cannot ensure that environmental requirements will not change
or become more stringent over time or that our eventual
environmental
clean-up
costs and liabilities will not exceed the amount of our current
reserves.
11
Provisions
of our Restated Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and Minnesota
law could deter takeover attempts.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents, under
Minnesota law, and in our shareholder rights plan could prevent
or delay transactions that our shareholders may favor.
Our Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws include
provisions relating to the election, appointment and removal of
directors, as well as shareholder notice and shareholder voting
requirements which could delay, prevent or make more difficult a
merger, tender offer, proxy contest or other change of control.
In addition, our common share purchase rights could cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to
acquire us, which could deter some acquirers from making
takeover proposals or tender offers. Also, the Minnesota
Business Corporations Act contains control share acquisition and
business combination provisions which could delay, prevent or
make more difficult a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or
other change of control. Our shareholders might view any such
transaction as being in their best interests since the
transaction could result in a higher stock price than the
current market price for our common stock.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our principal executive office is in leased premises located in
Golden Valley, Minnesota. We carry out our Water Group
manufacturing operations at 24 plants located throughout the
United States and at 19 plants located in 10 other countries. In
addition, our Water Group has 67 distribution facilities and 17
sales offices located in numerous countries throughout the
world. We carry out our Technical Products Group manufacturing
operations at 8 plants located throughout the United States and
9 plants located in 7 other countries. In addition, our
Technical Products Group has 11 distribution facilities and 31
sales offices located in numerous countries throughout the world.
We believe that our production facilities are suitable for their
purpose and are adequate to support our businesses.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We have been made parties to a number of actions filed or have
been given notice of potential claims relating to the conduct of
our business, including those pertaining to commercial disputes,
product liability, environmental, safety and health, patent
infringement, and employment matters.
We comply with the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and related guidance, and
record liabilities for an estimated loss from a loss contingency
where the outcome of the matter is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. Factors that are considered when
determining whether the conditions for accrual have been met
include the (a) nature of the litigation, claim, or
assessment, (b) progress of the case, including progress
after the date of the financial statements but before the
issuance date of the financial statements, (c) opinions of
legal counsel, and (d) managements intended response
to the litigation, claim, or assessment. Where the reasonable
estimate of the probable loss is a range, we record the most
likely estimate of the loss. When no amount within the range is
a better estimate than any other amount, however, the minimum
amount in the range is accrued. Gain contingencies are not
recorded until realized.
While we believe that a material adverse impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows from any such future charges is unlikely, given the
inherent uncertainty of litigation, a remote possibility exists
that a future adverse ruling or unfavorable development could
result in future charges that could have a material adverse
impact. We do and will continue to periodically reexamine our
estimates of probable liabilities and any associated expenses
and receivables and make appropriate adjustments to such
estimates based on experience and developments in litigation. As
a result, the current estimates of the potential
12
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows for the proceedings and claims
described in Legal Proceedings could change in the
future.
Environmental
We have been named as defendants, targets, or potentially
responsible parties (PRP) in a small number of
environmental
clean-ups,
in which our current or former business units have generally
been given de minimis status. To date, none of these
claims have resulted in
clean-up
costs, fines, penalties, or damages in an amount material to our
financial position or results of operations. We have disposed of
a number of businesses in recent years and in certain cases,
such as the disposition of the Cross Pointe Paper Corporation
uncoated paper business in 1995, the disposition of the Federal
Cartridge Company ammunition business in 1997, the disposition
of Lincoln Industrial in 2001, and the disposition of the Tools
Group in 2004, we have retained responsibility and potential
liability for certain environmental obligations. We have
received claims for indemnification from purchasers of these
businesses and have established what we believe to be adequate
accruals for potential liabilities arising out of retained
responsibilities. We settled some of the claims in prior years;
to date our recorded accruals have been adequate.
In addition, there are ongoing environmental issues at a limited
number of sites, including one site acquired in the acquisition
of Essef Corporation in 1999, which relate to operations no
longer carried out at the sites. We have established what we
believe to be adequate accruals for remediation costs at these
sites. We do not believe that projected response costs will
result in a material liability.
We may be named as a PRP at other sites in the future, for both
divested and acquired businesses. When the outcome of the matter
is probable and it is possible to provide reasonable estimates
of our liability with respect to environmental sites, provisions
have been made in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. As of December 31, 2006
and 2005, our undiscounted reserves for such environmental
liabilities were approximately $5.6 million and
$6.4 million, respectively. We cannot ensure that
environmental requirements will not change or become more
stringent over time or that our eventual environmental
clean-up
costs and liabilities will not exceed the amount of our current
reserves.
Product
liability claims
We are subject to various product liability lawsuits and
personal injury claims. A substantial number of these lawsuits
and claims are insured and accrued for by Penwald, our captive
insurance subsidiary. See discussion in ITEM 1 and
ITEM 8, Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements Insurance subsidiary. Penwald records a
liability for these claims based on actuarial projections of
ultimate losses. For all other claims, accruals covering the
claims are recorded, on an undiscounted basis, when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
information. The accruals are adjusted periodically as
additional information becomes available. We have not
experienced significant unfavorable trends in either the
severity or frequency of product liability lawsuits or personal
injury claims.
Horizon
litigation
Twenty-eight separate lawsuits involving 29 primary plaintiffs,
a class action, and claims for indemnity by Celebrity Cruise
Lines, Inc. (Celebrity) were brought against Essef
Corporation (Essef) and certain of its subsidiaries
prior to our acquisition of Essef in August 1999. The claims
against Essef and its involved subsidiaries were based upon the
allegation that Essef designed, manufactured, and marketed two
sand swimming pool filters that were installed as a part of the
spa system on the Horizon cruise ship, and allegations that the
spa and filters contained Legionnaires disease bacteria
that infected certain passengers on cruises from April 1994
through July 1994.
The individual and class claims by passengers were tried and
resulted in an adverse jury verdict finding liability on the
part of the Essef defendants (70%) and Celebrity and its sister
company, Fantasia (together 30%). After expiration of post-trial
appeals, we paid all outstanding punitive damage awards of
$7.0 million in the Horizon cases, plus interest of
approximately $1.6 million, in January 2004. All of the
personal injury cases have now been resolved through either
settlement or judgment.
13
The only remaining unresolved claims in this case were those
brought by Celebrity for damages resulting from the outbreak.
Celebrity filed an amended complaint seeking attorney fees and
costs for prior litigation as well as
out-of-pocket
losses, lost profits, and loss of business enterprise value. On
June 28, 2006, a jury returned a verdict against the Essef
defendants in the total amount of $193.0 million for its
claims for
out-of-pocket
expenses ($10.4 million), lost profits ($47.6 million)
and lost enterprise value ($135.0 million). The verdict was
exclusive of pre-judgment interest and attorneys fees.
On January 17, 2007, the Court ruled on our post-trial
motions, granting judgment in our favor as a matter of law with
respect to Celebritys claim for lost enterprise value
($135.0 million). The Court also granted a new trial with
respect to lost profits ($47.6 million). In addition, the
Court denied without prejudice our claim for contribution to
reduce Celebritys recovery by 30% to account for its
contributory negligence, with leave to renew the motion
following retrial.
Celebritys claim for lost profits at trial amounted to
approximately $60.3 million. We believe that actual lost
profits suffered, if any, are substantially less. In a new
trial, there remain questions of causation, contribution and
proof of damages to be determined. We intend to vigorously
defend against Celebritys claims. We cannot predict
whether Celebrity will appeal the ruling on lost enterprise
value, nor whether and to what extent Essef may eventually be
found liable on Celebritys claims.
Several issues have not been decided by the Court, including
whether Celebrity is entitled to recovery of its attorneys
fees and related costs in the passenger claims phase of the case
($4.1 million), and, with respect to pre-judgment interest,
the length of the interest period and the rate of interest on
any eventual judgment. We have assessed the impact of the ruling
on our previously established reserves for this matter and,
based on information available at this time, have not changed
our reserves following this ruling, except to take into account
quarterly interest accruals.
We believe that any judgment we pay in this matter would be
tax-deductible in the year paid or in subsequent years. In
addition to the impact of any loss on this matter on our
earnings per share when recognized, we may need to borrow funds
from our banks or other sources to pay any judgment finally
determined after exhaustion of all appeals. We expect that we
would have available adequate funds to allow us to do so, based
on discussions with our lending sources and our estimates of the
results of our business operations over the foreseeable future.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
None.
14
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Current executive officers of Pentair, their ages, current
position, and their business experience during at least the past
five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Current Position and Business Experience
|
|
Randall J. Hogan
|
|
51
|
|
Chief Executive Officer since
January 2001 and Chairman of the Board effective May 1,
2002; President and Chief Operating Officer, December
1999 December 2000; Executive Vice President and
President of Pentairs Electrical and Electronic Enclosures
Group, March 1998 December 1999; United Technologies
Carrier Transicold President 1995 1997;
Pratt & Whitney Industrial Turbines Vice President and
General Manager 1994 1995; General Electric various
executive positions 1988 1994; McKinsey &
Company consultant 1981 1987.
|
Richard J. Cathcart
|
|
62
|
|
Vice Chairman of Pentair since
February 2005; President and Chief Operating Officer of Water
Technologies Group January 2001 January 2005;
Executive Vice President and President of Pentairs Water
Technologies Group, February 1996 December 2000;
Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, March
1995 January 1996.
|
Michael V. Schrock
|
|
54
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer since September 2006; President and Chief Operating
Officer of Filtration and Technical Products, October
2005 September 2006; President and Chief Operating
Officer of Enclosures October 2001 September 2005;
President, Pentair Water Technologies Americas,
January 2001 October 2001; President, Pentair Pump
and Pool Group, August 2000 January 2001; President,
Pentair Pump Group, January 1999 August 2000; Vice
President and General Manager, Aurora, Fairbanks Morse and
Pentair Pump Group International, March 1998
December 1998; Divisional Vice President and General Manager,
Honeywell Inc., 1994 1998.
|
David D. Harrison*
|
|
59
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer February 2000 February 2007 ;
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The
Scotts Company, August 1999 February 2000; Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Coltec Industries,
August 1996 August 1999; Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Pentair, Inc., March
1994 July 1996; Senior Executive with General
Electric Technical Services organization, January
1990 March 1994. Various executive positions with
General Electric Plastics/Borg-Warner Chemicals
1972-1990.
|
John L. Stauch*
|
|
42
|
|
Executive Vice President since
February 2007; Chief Financial Officer of the Automation and
Control Systems unit of Honeywell International Inc., July
2005 February 2007; Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Sensing and Controls unit of
Honeywell International Inc., January 2004 July
2005; Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Automation & Control Products unit of Honeywell
International Inc., July 2002 January 2004; Chief
Financial Officer and IT Director of PerkinElmer
Optoelectronics, a unit of PerkinElmer, Inc., April
2000 April 2002; Various executive, investor
relations and managerial finance positions with Honeywell
International Inc. and its predecessor AlliedSignal Inc.,
1994 2000.
|
Louis L. Ainsworth
|
|
59
|
|
Senior Vice President and General
Counsel since July 1997 and Secretary since January 2002;
Shareholder and Officer of the law firm of Henson &
Efron, P.A., November 1985 June 1997.
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Current Position and Business Experience
|
|
Jack J. Dempsey
|
|
45
|
|
President, Filtration Division and
Senior Vice President, Operations, since May 2006; Senior Vice
President of Operations and Technology, April 2005
May 2006; Director, McKinsey and Company July 1999
March 2005; Prior McKinsey and Company experience: Principal,
July 1993 June 1999, Consultant, August
1987 June 1993; Chase Manhattan Bank, various retail
banking roles September 1983 August 1985.
|
Karen A. Durant
|
|
47
|
|
Senior Vice President of Finance
and Analysis since January 2006; Vice President of Finance and
Controller April 2002 December 2005; Vice President,
Controller, September 1997 March 2002; Controller,
January 1996 August 1997; Assistant Controller,
September 1994 December 1995; Director of Financial
Planning and Control of Hoffman Enclosures Inc. (subsidiary of
Pentair), October 1989 August 1994; various finance
and accounting positions with Honeywell Inc.,
1981-1989.
|
Frederick S. Koury
|
|
46
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human
Resources, since August 2003; Vice President of Human Resources
of the Victorias Secret Stores unit of Limited Brands,
September 2000 August 2003; PepsiCo, Inc., various
executive positions, June 1985 September 2000.
|
Michael G. Meyer
|
|
48
|
|
Vice President of Treasury and Tax
since April 2004; Treasurer, January 2002 March
2004; Assistant Treasurer, September 1994 December
2001. Various executive positions with Federal-Hoffman, Inc.
(former subsidiary of Pentair), August 1985 August
1994.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David D. Harrison will retire from
Pentair at the end of February 2007. He will be succeeded by
John L. Stauch as Chief Financial Officer.
|
16
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK, RELATED SECURITY HOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock
Exchange and trades under the symbol PNR. As of
December 31, 2006, there were 3,907 shareholders of record.
The high, low, and closing sales price for our common stock and
the dividends declared for each of the quarterly periods for
2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
41.90
|
|
|
$
|
41.55
|
|
|
$
|
34.43
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
|
$
|
44.32
|
|
|
$
|
46.03
|
|
|
$
|
45.17
|
|
|
$
|
38.41
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
34.01
|
|
|
$
|
32.05
|
|
|
$
|
25.69
|
|
|
$
|
26.25
|
|
|
$
|
38.39
|
|
|
$
|
37.45
|
|
|
$
|
36.11
|
|
|
$
|
30.80
|
|
Close
|
|
$
|
40.75
|
|
|
$
|
34.19
|
|
|
$
|
26.19
|
|
|
$
|
31.40
|
|
|
$
|
39.14
|
|
|
$
|
42.62
|
|
|
$
|
36.50
|
|
|
$
|
34.52
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Pentair has paid 124 consecutive quarterly dividends and has
increased dividends each year for 30 consecutive years.
Stock
Performance Graph
The following information under the caption Stock
Performance Graph in this ITEM 5 of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
is not deemed to be soliciting material or to be
filed with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or
14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the
liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we
specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.
The following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder
return on our common stock for the last five years, assuming the
investment of $100 on December 31, 2001 and the
reinvestment of all dividends since that date to
December 31, 2006. The graph also contains for comparison
purposes the S&P 500 Index and the S&P MidCap 400
Index, assuming the same investment level and reinvestment of
dividends.
By virtue of its market capitalization, Pentair is a component
of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. On the basis of our size and
diversity of businesses, we have not found a readily
identifiable peer group. We believe the S&P MidCap 400
Index is an appropriate comparison. We have evaluated other
published indices, but have determined that the results are
skewed by significantly larger companies included in the
indices. We believe such a comparison would not be meaningful.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Period
|
|
|
INDEXED RETURNS
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31:
|
|
Company/Index
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
PENTAIR INC
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
96.46
|
|
|
|
130.29
|
|
|
|
252.02
|
|
|
|
202.42
|
|
|
|
187.17
|
|
S&P 500 INDEX
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
|
|
100.25
|
|
|
|
111.15
|
|
|
|
116.61
|
|
|
|
135.03
|
|
S&P MIDCAP 400
INDEX
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
85.49
|
|
|
|
115.94
|
|
|
|
135.05
|
|
|
|
152.00
|
|
|
|
167.69
|
|
Purchases
of Equity Securities
The following table provides information with respect to
purchases made by Pentair of common stock during the fourth
quarter of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
|
|
October 1-October 28, 2006
|
|
|
348,916
|
|
|
$
|
27.94
|
|
|
|
336,000
|
|
|
$
|
40,640,979
|
|
October 29-November 25, 2006
|
|
|
18,495
|
|
|
$
|
33.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,640,979
|
|
November 26-December 31, 2006
|
|
|
14,452
|
|
|
$
|
31.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,640,979
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
381,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The purchases in this column
include shares repurchased as part of our publicly announced
programs and in addition, 12,916 shares for the period
October 1-October 28, 2006, 18,495 shares for the
period October 29-November 25, 2006 and
14,452 shares for the period
November 26-December 31, 2006 deemed surrendered to us
by participants in our Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the
Outside Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the
Plans) to satisfy the exercise price or withholding
of tax obligations related to the exercise of stock options and
non-vested shares.
|
|
(b) |
|
The average price paid in this
column includes shares repurchased as part of our publicly
announced programs and shares deemed surrendered to us by
participants in the Plans to satisfy the exercise price or
withholding of tax obligations related to the exercise price of
stock options and non-vested shares.
|
|
(c) |
|
The number of shares in this column
represents the number of shares repurchased as part of publicly
announced programs to repurchase up to $100 million of our
common stock in 2006.
|
18
|
|
|
(d) |
|
In December 2005, the Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our common
stock up to a maximum dollar limit of $25 million of our
common stock. On July 28, 2006, the Board of Directors
increased our repurchase authorization to $50 million, and
on September 28, 2006, the Board of Directors further
increased our repurchase authorization to $100 million. As
of December 31, 2006, we had purchased
1,986,026 shares for $59.4 million pursuant to these
programs during 2006. In December 2006, the Board of Directors
authorized the continuation of the repurchase program in 2007
with a maximum dollar limit of $40.6 million. This
authorization expires on December 31, 2007. As of
February 16, 2007, we had not repurchased any additional
shares under this plan and, accordingly, we have the authority
in 2007 to repurchase shares up to a maximum dollar limit of
$40.6 million. In 2005 and 2004, respectively, we
repurchased 755,663 shares and 105,500 shares of our
common stock under similar authorizations.
|
19
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands,
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
except per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
2,155,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,131,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,563,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,060,303
|
|
|
$
|
932,420
|
|
|
$
|
882,615
|
|
|
$
|
898,247
|
|
|
$
|
579,236
|
|
|
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
999,244
|
|
|
|
815,074
|
|
|
|
714,735
|
|
|
|
582,684
|
|
|
|
556,033
|
|
|
|
689,820
|
|
|
|
777,725
|
|
|
|
657,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,154,469
|
|
|
|
2,946,579
|
|
|
|
2,278,129
|
|
|
|
1,642,987
|
|
|
|
1,488,453
|
|
|
|
1,572,435
|
|
|
|
1,675,972
|
|
|
|
1,236,736
|
|
|
|
Sales growth
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
(5.3
|
%)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
%)
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,248,219
|
|
|
|
2,098,558
|
|
|
|
1,623,419
|
|
|
|
1,196,757
|
|
|
|
1,107,212
|
|
|
|
1,163,001
|
|
|
|
1,199,122
|
|
|
|
883,737
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
906,250
|
|
|
|
848,021
|
|
|
|
654,710
|
|
|
|
446,230
|
|
|
|
381,241
|
|
|
|
409,434
|
|
|
|
476,850
|
|
|
|
352,999
|
|
Margin %
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
541,209
|
|
|
|
478,907
|
|
|
|
376,015
|
|
|
|
253,088
|
|
|
|
230,994
|
|
|
|
266,229
|
|
|
|
267,518
|
|
|
|
231,100
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
58,055
|
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
31,453
|
|
|
|
22,932
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
|
|
15,941
|
|
|
|
18,138
|
|
|
|
11,927
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,427
|
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
|
16,743
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,105
|
|
|
|
19,393
|
|
|
|
16,743
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
Water
|
|
|
212,498
|
|
|
|
267,138
|
|
|
|
197,310
|
|
|
|
143,962
|
|
|
|
126,559
|
|
|
|
109,792
|
|
|
|
120,732
|
|
|
|
73,362
|
|
|
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
148,905
|
|
|
|
109,229
|
|
|
|
87,844
|
|
|
|
51,094
|
|
|
|
29,942
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
96,268
|
|
|
|
46,346
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(54,417
|
)
|
|
|
(53,295
|
)
|
|
|
(37,912
|
)
|
|
|
(24,846
|
)
|
|
|
(25,206
|
)
|
|
|
(25,444
|
)
|
|
|
(45,197
|
)
|
|
|
(26,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
306,986
|
|
|
|
323,072
|
|
|
|
247,242
|
|
|
|
170,210
|
|
|
|
131,295
|
|
|
|
86,205
|
|
|
|
171,803
|
|
|
|
93,228
|
|
|
|
Margin %
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
51,881
|
|
|
|
44,989
|
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
26,395
|
|
|
|
28,412
|
|
|
|
40,325
|
|
|
|
46,435
|
|
|
|
30,467
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of investment
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
(5,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
|
|
98,469
|
|
|
|
73,008
|
|
|
|
45,665
|
|
|
|
27,884
|
|
|
|
12,147
|
|
|
|
41,580
|
|
|
|
21,406
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
183,767
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
|
|
137,024
|
|
|
|
98,150
|
|
|
|
74,999
|
|
|
|
30,748
|
|
|
|
83,788
|
|
|
|
41,355
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,248
|
|
|
|
46,138
|
|
|
|
54,903
|
|
|
|
26,768
|
|
|
|
(27,872
|
)
|
|
|
61,954
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,047
|
)
|
|
|
(2,936
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,647
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
|
$
|
141,352
|
|
|
$
|
129,902
|
|
|
$
|
32,869
|
|
|
$
|
55,887
|
|
|
$
|
103,309
|
|
|
|
Common share data*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Basic EPS discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS net income
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Diluted EPS
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS net income
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
Stock dividends declared per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value per share (December 31)
|
|
|
31.40
|
|
|
|
34.52
|
|
|
|
43.56
|
|
|
|
22.85
|
|
|
|
17.28
|
|
|
|
18.26
|
|
|
|
12.09
|
|
|
|
19.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2005 we early adopted
SFAS 123R retroactively to January 1, 2005. The
incremental impact of SFAS 123R to the results of
operations for 2006 and 2005 include after tax expense of
$9.9 million and $12.0 million, respectively, or
($0.10) and ($0.12) diluted EPS, respectively.
|
|
* |
|
All share and per share information
presented in this
Form 10-K
has been retroactively restated to reflect the effect of a 100%
stock dividend in 2004.
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands,
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
except per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet
data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
422,134
|
|
|
$
|
423,847
|
|
|
$
|
396,459
|
|
|
$
|
251,475
|
|
|
$
|
223,778
|
|
|
$
|
229,455
|
|
|
$
|
284,674
|
|
|
$
|
247,404
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
398,857
|
|
|
|
349,312
|
|
|
|
323,676
|
|
|
|
166,862
|
|
|
|
165,389
|
|
|
|
178,464
|
|
|
|
208,267
|
|
|
|
179,073
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
330,372
|
|
|
|
311,839
|
|
|
|
336,302
|
|
|
|
233,106
|
|
|
|
236,322
|
|
|
|
231,615
|
|
|
|
248,576
|
|
|
|
265,027
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,718,771
|
|
|
|
1,718,207
|
|
|
|
1,620,404
|
|
|
|
997,183
|
|
|
|
843,243
|
|
|
|
743,499
|
|
|
|
786,984
|
|
|
|
800,937
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
|
3,120,575
|
|
|
|
2,780,677
|
|
|
|
2,514,450
|
|
|
|
2,372,198
|
|
|
|
2,644,025
|
|
|
|
2,706,516
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
744,061
|
|
|
|
752,614
|
|
|
|
736,105
|
|
|
|
806,493
|
|
|
|
735,085
|
|
|
|
723,706
|
|
|
|
913,974
|
|
|
|
1,035,084
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,669,999
|
|
|
|
1,555,610
|
|
|
|
1,447,794
|
|
|
|
1,261,478
|
|
|
|
1,105,724
|
|
|
|
1,015,002
|
|
|
|
1,010,591
|
|
|
|
990,771
|
|
|
|
Other data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt/total capital
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
33.7
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
41.6
|
%
|
|
|
47.5
|
%
|
|
|
51.1
|
%
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
35,978
|
|
|
|
35,842
|
|
|
|
26,751
|
|
|
|
20,517
|
|
|
|
19,478
|
|
|
|
19,472
|
|
|
|
19,157
|
|
|
|
15,453
|
|
|
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
19,617
|
|
|
|
19,318
|
|
|
|
19,408
|
|
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
|
19,026
|
|
|
|
23,008
|
|
|
|
20,701
|
|
|
|
26,846
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
56,899
|
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
|
|
47,063
|
|
|
|
40,809
|
|
|
|
38,577
|
|
|
|
43,041
|
|
|
|
42,491
|
|
|
|
42,466
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,560
|
|
|
|
18,074
|
|
|
|
12,714
|
|
|
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,273
|
|
|
|
9,088
|
|
|
|
8,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,833
|
|
|
|
27,162
|
|
|
|
21,127
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of goodwill
amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
|
|
(3,768
|
)
|
|
|
(3,453
|
)
|
Diluted EPS effect of goodwill
amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Other amortization
|
|
|
18,197
|
|
|
|
15,995
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
231,611
|
|
|
|
247,858
|
|
|
|
264,091
|
|
|
|
262,939
|
|
|
|
270,794
|
|
|
|
232,334
|
|
|
|
184,947
|
|
|
|
144,296
|
|
Capital expenditures
continuing operations
|
|
|
51,078
|
|
|
|
62,471
|
|
|
|
43,107
|
|
|
|
29,004
|
|
|
|
24,346
|
|
|
|
37,008
|
|
|
|
42,238
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
Capital expenditures
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,760
|
|
|
|
14,618
|
|
|
|
32,350
|
|
|
|
16,660
|
|
|
|
25,803
|
|
|
|
29,977
|
|
Capital expenditures
continuing and discontinued operations
|
|
|
51,078
|
|
|
|
62,471
|
|
|
|
48,867
|
|
|
|
43,622
|
|
|
|
56,696
|
|
|
|
53,668
|
|
|
|
68,041
|
|
|
|
53,671
|
|
Employees of continuing operations
|
|
|
14,800
|
|
|
|
14,700
|
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
Days sales outstanding in
receivables(2)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Days inventory on
hand(2)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective January 1, 2002 we
adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. This standard requires goodwill and intangible assets
deemed to have an indefinite life no longer be amortized. This
standard did not require restatement of prior period amounts to
be consistent with the current year presentation and therefore,
we have not made any adjustments to the historical financial
information presented. However, we have provided supplemental
tax and diluted EPS information as we believe it is necessary to
the understanding of our financial performance trend. Our
accounting policy prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 142 was to amortize goodwill on a
straight-line basis over the estimated future periods to be
benefited, principally between 25 and 40 years.
|
|
(2) |
|
Calculated using a
13-month
average.
|
In 2004, we divested our Tools Group. Our financial statements
have been restated to reflect the Tools Group as a discontinued
operation for all periods presented. The 2004 results reflect a
pre-tax gain on the sale of the Tools Group of $3.0 million
($6.0 million loss after tax).
In 2002, capital expenditures from discontinued operations
included $23.0 million for the acquisition of a previously
leased facility.
21
In 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, resulting in
an increase to other assets and other noncurrent liabilities of
$7.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and a
cumulative transition adjustment of $6.7 million in OCI.
The transition adjustment relates to our hedging activities
through December 31, 2000. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 133, financial instruments designated as
hedges were not recorded in the financial statements, but cash
flows from such contracts were recorded as adjustments to
earnings as the hedged items affected earnings.
In 2001, cost of goods sold included $1.0 million related
to the 2001 restructuring charge for our Technical Products
segment.
In 2000, we discontinued our Equipment segment (Century Mfg.
Co./Lincoln Automotive and Lincoln Industrial businesses). Our
financial statements have been restated to reflect the Equipment
segment as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.
The 2001 results reflected a pre-tax loss on the sale of these
businesses of $36.3 million ($24.6 million loss after
tax).
In 2000, operations reflected a non-cash pre-tax cumulative
effect of accounting change related to revenue recognition that
reduced income by $0.03 million, net of tax. Reference
should be made to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
22
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
This report contains statements that we believe to be
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or
forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements generally
can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such
as may, will, expect,
intend, estimate,
anticipate, believe,
project, or continue, or the negative
thereof or similar words. From time to time, we also may provide
oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we
release to the public. Any or all of our forward-looking
statements in this report and in any public statements we make
could be materially different from actual results. They can be
affected by assumptions we might make or by known or unknown
risks or uncertainties. Consequently, we cannot guarantee any
forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Investors
should also understand that it is not possible to predict or
identify all such factors and should not consider the following
list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and
uncertainties.
The following factors and those discussed in ITEM 1A, Risk
Factors, of this
Form 10-K
may impact the achievement of forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
changes in general economic and industry conditions, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the strength of product demand and the markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
the intensity of competition, including that from foreign
competitors;
|
|
|
|
pricing pressures;
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of new product introductions and enhancements;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new products and enhancements by competitors;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain and expand relationships with large
customers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to source raw material commodities from our
suppliers without interruption and at reasonable prices;
|
|
|
|
our ability to source components from third parties, in
particular from foreign manufacturers, without interruption and
at reasonable prices; and
|
|
|
|
the financial condition of our customers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully limit damages arising out of the
Horizon litigation;
|
|
|
our ability to identify, complete, and integrate acquisitions
successfully and to realize expected synergies on our
anticipated timetable;
|
|
|
changes in our business strategies, including acquisition,
divestiture, and restructuring activities;
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental and regulatory policies;
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions, such as political
instability, the rate of economic growth in our principal
geographic or product markets, or fluctuations in exchange rates;
|
|
|
changes in operating factors, such as continued improvement in
manufacturing activities and the achievement of related
efficiencies, cost reductions, and inventory risks due to shifts
in market demand and costs associated with moving production
overseas;
|
|
|
our ability to continue to successfully generate savings from
our excellence in operations initiatives consisting of lean
enterprise, supply management and cash flow practices;
|
|
|
unanticipated developments that could occur with respect to
contingencies such as litigation, intellectual property matters,
product liability exposures and environmental matters;
|
23
|
|
|
our ability to accurately evaluate the effects of contingent
liabilities such as tax, product liability, environmental, and
other claims; and
|
|
|
our ability to access capital markets and obtain anticipated
financing under favorable terms.
|
The foregoing factors are not exhaustive, and new factors may
emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that would
impact our business. We assume no obligation, and disclaim any
duty, to update the forward-looking statements in this report.
Overview
We are a focused diversified industrial manufacturing company
comprised of two operating segments: Water and Technical
Products. Our Water Group is a global leader in providing
innovative products and systems used worldwide in the movement,
storage, treatment, and enjoyment of water. Our Technical
Products Group is a leader in the global enclosures and thermal
management markets, designing and manufacturing standard,
modified, and custom enclosures that house and protect sensitive
electronics and electrical components; thermal management
products; and accessories. In 2007, we expect our Water Group
and Technical Products Group to generate approximately 70% and
30% of total revenues, respectively.
Our Water Group has progressively become a more important part
of our business portfolio with sales increasing from
approximately $125 million in 1995 to approximately
$2.2 billion in 2006. We believe the water industry is
structurally attractive as a result of a growing demand for
clean water and the large global market size (of which we have
identified a target market totaling $60 billion). Our
vision is to be a leading global provider of innovative products
and systems used in the movement, storage, treatment, and
enjoyment of water.
Our Technical Products Group operates in a large global market
with significant potential for growth in industry segments such
as defense, security, medical, and networking. We believe we
have the largest enclosures industrial and commercial
distribution network in North America and the highest enclosures
brand recognition in the industry in North America. From
mid-2001 through 2003, the Technical Products Group experienced
significantly lower sales volumes as a result of severely
reduced capital spending in the industrial and commercial
markets and over-capacity and weak demand in the datacom and
telecom markets. From 2004 through 2006, sales volumes increased
due to the addition of new distributors, new products, and
higher demand in targeted markets. In addition, through the
success of our Pentair Integrated Management System
(PIMS) initiatives, we have increased Technical
Products segment operating margins to our goal of 15% and
achieved 17 consecutive quarters of
year-over-year
operating margin expansion.
Key
Trends and Uncertainties
The following trends and uncertainties affected our financial
performance in 2006 and will likely impact our results in the
future:
|
|
|
The housing market and new pool starts slowed dramatically in
the first quarter of 2006 and shrank in the last three quarters
of the year. We believe that construction of new homes and new
pools starts in North America affects approximately 25% of the
sales of our Water Group, especially for our pool and spa
businesses. The impact of this downturn reduced our expected
revenues in 2006 and will likely continue to have an uncertain
impact on our revenues in 2007.
|
|
|
We experience seasonal demand in a number of markets within our
Water Group. End-user demand for pool equipment follows warm
weather trends and is at seasonal highs from April to August.
The magnitude of the sales spike is partially mitigated by
employing some advance sales early buy programs
(generally including extended payment terms
and/or
additional discounts). Demand for residential and agricultural
water systems is also impacted by economic conditions and
weather patterns, particularly by heavy flooding and droughts.
|
|
|
We expect our operations to continue to benefit from our PIMS
initiatives which include strategy deployment; lean enterprise
with special focus on sourcing and supply management, cash flow
management, and lean operations; and IGNITE, our process to
drive organic growth.
|
24
|
|
|
We are experiencing material cost and other inflation in a
number of our businesses. We are striving for greater
productivity improvements and implementing selective increases
in selling prices to help mitigate cost increases in base
materials such as metals and other costs such as pensions,
health care and insurance.
|
|
|
We have a long-term goal to consistently generate free cash flow
that equals or exceeds 100% of our net income. Free cash flow,
which we define as cash flow from operating activities less
capital expenditures, including both continuing and discontinued
operations, plus proceeds from sale of property and equipment,
exceeded $200 million for the fourth consecutive year in
2005 and was $181 million in 2006. See our discussion of
Other financial measures under the caption
Liquidity and Capital Resources of this report.
|
|
|
We experienced unfavorable foreign currency effects on net sales
in the first quarter of 2006 and favorable foreign currency
effects in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2006.
Overall, we experienced favorable foreign currency effect on net
sales in 2006. Our currency effect is primarily for the
U.S. dollar against the euro, which may or may not trend
favorably in the future.
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for 2006 was 28.1% due in part to
favorable resolution of prior tax years and higher utilization
of foreign tax credits. We continue to actively pursue
initiatives to reduce our effective tax rate. The tax rate in
any quarter can be affected positively or negatively by
adjustments that are required to be reported in the specific
quarter of resolution. We expect our full year effective tax
rate in 2007 to be between 35% and 36%.
|
Outlook
In 2007, our operating objectives include the following:
|
|
|
Continue to drive operating excellence through lean enterprise
initiatives, with special focus on sourcing and supply
management, cash flow management, and lean operations;
|
|
|
Continue the integration of acquisitions and realize identified
synergistic opportunities;
|
|
|
Continue proactive talent development, particularly in
international management and other key functional areas;
|
|
|
Achieve organic sales growth (in excess of market growth rates),
particularly in international markets; and
|
|
|
Continue to make strategic acquisitions to grow and expand our
existing platforms in our Water and Technical Products Groups.
|
The ability to achieve our operating objectives will depend, to
a certain extent, on factors outside our control. See Risk
Factors under Part I of this report.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
sales
The components of the net sales change were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages
|
|
2006 vs. 2005
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
The 7.1 percent increase in consolidated net sales in
2006 from 2005 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
an increase in sales volume due to our acquisitions, primarily
the December 1, 2005 acquisition of the McLean Thermal
Management, Aspen Motion Technologies, and Electronic Solutions
businesses from APW, Ltd. (collectively,
Thermal); and
|
25
|
|
|
organic sales growth of approximately two percent (excluding the
effects of acquisitions and foreign currency exchange), which
includes selective increases in selling prices to mitigate
inflationary cost increases.
|
The 29.3 percent increase in consolidated net sales in
2005 from 2004 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
an increase in sales volume driven by our July 31, 2004
acquisition of WICOR, February 23, 2005 acquisition of DEP
and December 1, 2005 acquisition of Thermal;
|
|
|
pro forma sales growth from continuing operations of
approximately six percent, assuming we had acquired WICOR at the
beginning of 2004, excluding the Thermal acquisition, and
excluding the effects of foreign currency translation;
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices in our Water and Technical
Products Groups to mitigate inflationary cost increases; and
|
|
|
favorable foreign currency effects.
|
Sales by segment and the
year-over-year
changes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$ change
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
$ change
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
2,155,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,131,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,563,394
|
|
|
$
|
23,720
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
$
|
568,111
|
|
|
|
36.3%
|
|
Technical Products
|
|
|
999,244
|
|
|
|
815,074
|
|
|
|
714,735
|
|
|
|
184,170
|
|
|
|
22.6%
|
|
|
|
100,339
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,278,129
|
|
|
$
|
207,890
|
|
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
$
|
668,450
|
|
|
|
29.3%
|
|
|
|
Water
The 1.1 percent increase in Water segment sales in 2006
from 2005 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
organic sales growth of approximately one percent (excluding
foreign currency exchange), which includes selective increases
in selling prices to mitigate inflationary cost increases;
|
|
|
|
|
|
strong pump sales in our commercial markets;
|
|
|
|
increased sales in Europe driven by higher pump and filtration
sales;
|
|
|
|
sales growth in emerging markets in Asia-Pacific;
|
|
|
|
sales growth of filtration products in our foodservice,
commercial, and industrial markets; and
|
|
|
|
favorable foreign currency effects.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
lower sales of pool and spa products due to softening of the
U.S. residential housing market and inventory draw-downs by
pool distribution customers to position themselves for the
softening market.
|
The 36.3 percent increase in Water segment sales in 2005
from 2004 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
an increase in sales volume driven by our July 31, 2004
acquisition of WICOR and our February 23, 2005 acquisition
of DEP;
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases;
|
|
|
sales growth on a pro forma basis (assuming we had acquired
WICOR at the beginning of 2004 and excluding favorable foreign
currency exchange) of approximately four percent for the year;
|
|
|
an increase in sales of pool and spa equipment due to market
share gains, favorable weather conditions, and successful early
buy programs;
|
|
|
growth in international markets; and
|
|
|
favorable foreign currency effects.
|
26
Technical
Products
The 22.6 percent increase in Technical Products segment
sales in 2006 from 2005 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
an increase in sales volume due to our December 1, 2005
acquisition of the Thermal businesses;
|
|
|
organic sales growth of approximately six percent (excluding
acquisitions and foreign currency exchange), which includes
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased sales in our commercial and industrial markets;
|
|
|
|
increased sales in European test and measurement and telecom
markets;
|
|
|
|
higher sales in Asia driven by key OEM programs in China and
stronger sales in the telecom and semiconductor markets in
Japan; and
|
|
|
|
favorable foreign currency effects.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
lower sales to North American telecom businesses due to weaker
markets conditions, customer consolidation and certain key
projects reaching
end-of-life; and
|
|
|
lower sales in data markets related to OEM projects that reached
end-of-life
or were transitioned to our Asian operations.
|
The 14.0 percent increase in Technical Products segment
sales in 2005 from 2004 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
growth in new products including Advanced Telecommunications
Computing Architecture (ATCA), slide rails for datacom
applications and a new cabinet line targeted toward the telecom
and electronic markets;
|
|
|
improved service and delivery resulting in increased sales
volume in North America with strong sales in commercial and
medical industry segments;
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases;
|
|
|
an increase in sales volume driven by our December 1, 2005
acquisition of the Thermal businesses;
|
|
|
higher sales in China; and
|
|
|
favorable foreign currency effects.
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2005
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2004
|
|
% of sales
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$906,250
|
|
28.7%
|
|
$848,021
|
|
28.8%
|
|
$654,710
|
|
28.7%
|
|
|
Percentage point change
|
|
|
|
(0.1) pts
|
|
|
|
0.1 pts
|
|
|
|
|
The 0.1 percentage point decrease in gross profit as a
percent of sales in 2006 from 2005 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
inflationary increases related to material, labor and freight
costs;
|
|
|
increased reserves for inventory and warranty expenses in our
Water Group due to the effects of the U.S. residential
housing market downturn on the spa and bath markets and new pool
starts, and also due to inventory reserves established for pump
motors that we no longer expect to need;
|
|
|
lower sales of pool and spa products related to the
U.S. residential housing market downturn; and
|
|
|
operating inefficiencies related to product moves and plant
consolidations.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices in our Water and Technical
Products Groups to mitigate inflationary cost increases;
|
27
|
|
|
savings generated from our PIMS initiatives including lean and
supply management practices;
|
|
|
cost leverage from increased sales volume in our Technical
Products Group; and
|
|
|
absence of
start-up
costs in new water facilities (incurred in 2005).
|
The 0.1 percentage point increase in gross profit as a
percent of sales in 2005 from 2004 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices in our Water and Technical
Products Groups to mitigate inflationary cost increases;
|
|
|
savings generated from our PIMS initiatives including lean
enterprise and supply management practices;
|
|
|
cost leverage from our increase in sales volume; and
|
|
|
synergy benefits, net of integration costs, related to the
acquisition of the former WICOR businesses.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
inflationary cost increases in our Water and Technical Products
Groups;
|
|
|
lower margins associated with our July 31, 2004 acquisition
of WICOR; and
|
|
|
operating inefficiencies related to WICOR product moves, plant
consolidations, and
start-up
costs in new water facilities.
|
Selling,
general and administrative (SG&A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2005
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2004
|
|
% of sales
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
$541,209
|
|
17.2%
|
|
$478,907
|
|
16.2%
|
|
$376,015
|
|
16.5%
|
|
|
Percentage point change
|
|
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
|
|
(0.3) pts
|
|
|
|
|
The 1.0 percentage point increase in SG&A expense as
a percent of sales in 2006 from 2005 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
higher selling, general and administrative expense to fund
investments in future growth in our Water Group, including
personnel and business infrastructure, with an emphasis on
growth in our international markets; and
|
|
|
severance costs in our Water Group and at our corporate
headquarters, and increased reserves for accounts receivable due
to the effects of the U.S. residential housing market
downturn on the spa and bath markets and new pool starts in our
Water Group.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
cost leverage from our increase in sales volume in the Technical
Products Group.
|
The 0.3 percentage point decrease in SG&A expense as
a percent of sales in 2005 from 2004 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
favorable cost leverage from the combined larger company of
Pentair and the former WICOR businesses.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
adoption of SFAS 123R which requires us to record expense
for the fair value of stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
investments made to support future growth; and
|
|
|
higher amortization of intangibles due to acquisitions and
amortization of a tax strategy-based investment.
|
28
Research
and development (R&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2005
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2004
|
|
% of sales
|
|
|
R&D
|
|
$58,055
|
|
1.8%
|
|
$46,042
|
|
1.6%
|
|
$31,453
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
Percentage point change
|
|
|
|
0.2 pts
|
|
|
|
0.2 pts
|
|
|
|
|
The 0.2 percentage point increase in R&D expense as
a percent of sales in 2006 from 2005 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
additional investments related to new product development
initiatives in our Water and Technical Products Groups; and
|
|
|
proportionately higher R&D spending in the acquired Thermal
businesses.
|
The 0.2 percentage point increase in R&D expense as
a percent of sales in 2005 from 2004 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
increased spending for new product and new markets, especially
for water filtration.
|
Operating
income
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2005
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2004
|
|
% of sales
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$212,498
|
|
9.9%
|
|
$267,138
|
|
12.5%
|
|
$197,310
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
Percentage point change
|
|
|
|
(2.6) pts
|
|
|
|
(0.1) pts
|
|
|
|
|
The 2.6 percentage point decrease in Water segment
operating income as a percent of net sales in 2006 from 2005 was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
inflationary increases related to material, labor, and freight
costs;
|
|
|
lower sales of pool and spa products related to the
U.S. residential housing market downturn;
|
|
|
planned investments in new products and new customers,
reinforcing international talent, and implementing a unified
business infrastructure in Europe;
|
|
|
unfavorable product mix;
|
|
|
increased inventory, warranty, and accounts receivable reserves
and severance costs due to the effects of the
U.S. residential housing market downturn on the spa and
bath markets and new pool starts; and
|
|
|
manufacturing inefficiencies resulting from plant and product
line moves.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases; and
|
|
|
savings realized from continued success of PIMS, including lean
and supply management activities.
|
The 0.1 percentage point decrease in Water segment
operating income as a percent of net sales in 2005 from 2004 was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
lower initial margins associated with our July 31, 2004
acquisition of WICOR during the first half of 2005;
|
|
|
inflationary cost increases for certain production materials;
|
|
|
operating inefficiencies related to WICOR product moves, plant
consolidations, and
start-up
costs associated with new water facilities;
|
29
|
|
|
adoption of SFAS 123R which requires us to record expense
for the fair value of stock-based compensation; and
|
|
|
investments made to support future growth.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
synergy benefits, net of integration costs, related to the
acquisition of the former WICOR businesses;
|
|
|
favorable operating leverage provided by supply management
savings and productivity gains from higher sales volume; and
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases.
|
Technical
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2005
|
|
% of sales
|
|
2004
|
|
% of sales
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$148,905
|
|
14.9%
|
|
$109,229
|
|
13.4%
|
|
$87,844
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
Percentage point change
|
|
|
|
1.5 pts
|
|
|
|
1.1 pts
|
|
|
|
|
The 1.5 percentage point increase in Technical Products
segment operating income as a percent of net sales in 2006 from
2005 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
leverage gained on volume expansion through market share growth;
|
|
|
savings realized from the continued success of PIMS, including
lean and supply management activities; and
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
inflationary increases related to materials, labor and freight
costs.
|
The 1.1 percentage point increase in Technical Products
segment operating income as a percent of net sales in 2005 from
2004 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
selective increases in selling prices to mitigate inflationary
cost increases;
|
|
|
leverage gained on volume expansion through new product sales
and market share growth; and
|
|
|
savings from the continued success of PIMS, including lean
enterprise and supply management activities.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
material cost inflation, primarily aluminum and steel; and
|
|
|
adoption of SFAS 123R which requires us to record expense
for the fair value of stock-based compensation.
|
Net
interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
51,881
|
|
|
$
|
44,989
|
|
|
$
|
6,892
|
|
|
|
15.3%
|
|
|
$
|
44,989
|
|
|
$
|
37,210
|
|
|
$
|
7,779
|
|
|
|
20.9%
|
|
|
|
The 15.3 percent increase in interest expense from
continuing operations in 2006 from 2005 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
higher average outstanding debt in 2006 primarily as a result of
the acquired Thermal businesses and an increase in
inventory; and
|
|
|
incremental interest expense related to the payments made in
connection with the final resolution of the net asset value
dispute with The Black and Decker Corporation (BDK)
in the first quarter of 2006.
|
30
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
favorable adjustments to interest expense related to the
favorable settlement of prior years federal tax returns in
the second and third quarters of 2006.
|
The 20.9 percent increase in interest expense from
continuing operations in 2005 from 2004 was primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
a portion of interest expense in 2004 being allocated to
discontinued operations for our former Tools Group versus all
the interest expense in 2005 being attributed to continuing
operations; and
|
|
|
higher interest rates in 2005.
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
255,469
|
|
|
$
|
283,518
|
|
|
$
|
210,032
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
|
|
98,469
|
|
|
|
73,008
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
34.8
|
%
|
The 6.6 percentage point decrease in the tax rate in
2006 from 2005 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
higher utilization of foreign tax credits;
|
|
|
the favorable settlement in 2006 of prior years federal
tax returns; and
|
|
|
an unfavorable settlement in 2005 for a routine tax exam for
prior years in Germany.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a favorable settlement in 2005 related to prior years
federal tax returns; and
|
|
|
a favorable adjustment in 2005 related to the filing of our 2004
federal tax return.
|
The 0.1 percentage point decrease in the tax rate in
2005 from 2004 was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
a favorable benefit related to R&D tax credits;
|
|
|
a favorable settlement in 2005 related to prior years
federal tax returns;
|
|
|
a favorable adjustment in 2005 related to the filing of our 2004
federal tax return; and
|
|
|
a benefit related to the deduction for qualified production
activities.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
an unfavorable settlement in 2005 for a routine tax examination
of prior years in Germany; and
|
|
|
higher effective tax rate in 2005 due to the non-deductibility
of certain SFAS 123R expenses related to stock options.
|
We expect our full year effective tax rate in 2007 to be between
35% and 36%. We will continue to pursue tax rate reduction
opportunities.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures,
equity investments, acquisitions, debt repayments, and dividend
payments are generally funded from cash generated from
operations, availability under existing committed revolving
credit facilities, and in certain instances, public and private
debt and equity offerings. In 2006, we invested $29 million
in acquisitions, repurchased $59 million of our stock, paid
$57 million in dividends, and decreased our debt by
$9 million.
We experience seasonal cash flows primarily due to seasonal
demand in a number of markets within our Water Group. End-user
demand for pool equipment follows warm weather trends and is at
seasonal highs from April
31
to August. The magnitude of the sales spike is partially
mitigated by employing some advance sales early buy
programs (generally including extended payment terms
and/or
additional discounts). Demand for residential and agricultural
water systems is also impacted by weather patterns, particularly
by heavy flooding and droughts.
The following table presents selected working capital
measurements calculated from our monthly operating results based
on a
13-month
moving average:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
Days
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Days of sales in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Days inventory on hand
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Days in accounts payable
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Operating
activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $231.6 million in
2006, or $16.2 million lower compared with the same period
in 2005. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities
was due primarily to working capital increases related to
increased inventory levels and decreases in various accruals.
The increase in days inventory on hand as of December 31,
2006 compared to December 31, 2005 was attributable to
increased inventory levels to support product moves and plant
rationalizations, inventory to support product sourced from low
cost countries, higher value of inventories due to rising raw
material input costs, and due to the purchase of additional
submersible pump motors for competitive reasons. In the future,
we expect our working capital ratios to improve as we complete
our facility rationalization activities and capitalize on our
PIMS initiatives.
Cash provided by operating activities was $247.9 million in
2005, or $16.2 million lower compared with the same period
in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities
was due to working capital increases related to increased sales
volume, the rationalization of Water Group operations, and
increases in various customer rebates. The increased days of
sales in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2005
compared to December 31, 2004 was the result of the
differences in sales terms offered by the former WICOR business
compared to the terms offered by our former Tools Group and the
sale of approximately a $22.0 million interest in a pool of
accounts receivable to a third-party financial institution in
2004. The increased days inventory on hand as of
December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004 was
driven by the increased inventory levels attributable to
increased sourcing out of Asia, higher value of inventories due
to rising raw material input costs, and inventory redundancies
associated with the
ramp-up of
new facilities and the wind-down of old facilities.
Cash provided by operating activities was $264.1 million in
2004, or $1.2 million higher compared with the same period
in 2003. The increase in net cash provided by operating
activities was primarily attributable to an increase in net
income offset by higher levels of inventory due to inventory
builds to support customers during product transfers and plant
consolidation activities in Water. The WICOR acquisition also
increased our working capital ratios, primarily inventory days.
In December 2006 and 2004, we sold approximately
$30.0 million and $22.0 million, respectively, of
accounts receivable to a third-party financial institution to
mitigate accounts receivable concentration risk because we did
not offer or the customer did not take advantage of the early
pay discounts and to provide additional financing capacity. In
compliance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities, sales of accounts receivable are reflected
as a reduction of accounts receivable in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets and the proceeds are included in the cash flows
from operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows. In 2006, a loss in the amount of $0.8 million
related to the sale of accounts receivable is included in the
line item Gain on sale of assets, net in our
Consolidated Statements of Income. In 2004, no gain or loss was
recorded as the estimated present value of the receivables sold
approximated the carrying amount.
32
Investing
activities
Capital expenditures in 2006, 2005, and 2004 were
$51.1 million, $62.5 million and $48.9 million
(including $43.1 million for continuing operations),
respectively. We anticipate capital expenditures for fiscal 2007
to be approximately $70 to $80 million, primarily for
capacity expansions in our low cost country manufacturing
facilities, implementation of a unified business systems
infrastructure in Europe, new product development, and general
maintenance capital.
On April 12, 2006, we acquired, as part of our Water Group,
the assets of Geyers Manufacturing & Design Inc.
and FTA Filtration, Inc. (together Krystil Klear),
two privately held companies, for $15.5 million in cash.
Krystil Klear expands our industrial filtration product offering
to include a full range of steel and stainless steel tanks which
house filtration solutions.
During 2006, we completed several other small acquisitions
totaling $14.2 million in cash and notes payable, adding to
both our Water and Technical Products Groups.
In January 2006, pursuant to the purchase agreement for the sale
of our former Tools Group, we completed the repurchase of a
manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China from BDK for
approximately $5.7 million. We recorded no gain or loss on
the repurchase. In March 2006, we completed an outstanding net
asset value arbitration with BDK relating to the purchase price
for the sale of our former Tools Group. The decision by the
arbitrator constituted a final resolution of all disputes
between BDK and us regarding the net asset value. We paid the
final net asset value purchase price adjustment pursuant to the
purchase agreement of $16.1 million plus interest of
$1.1 million in March 2006, resulting in an incremental
pre-tax loss on disposal of discontinued operations of
$3.4 million or $1.6 million net of tax. In the third
quarter of 2006, we resolved a prior year tax item that resulted
in a $1.4 million income tax benefit related to our former
Tools Group. Also in March 2006, we exited a leased facility
from our former Service Equipment business resulting in a net
cash outflow of $2.2 million and an immaterial gain from
disposition.
During 2006, we made investments in and loans to certain joint
ventures in the amount of $7.5 million.
Cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of
$17.1 million in 2005 was primarily related to the sale of
three facilities for our Water Group.
On December 1, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Technical
Products Group, the Thermal businesses from APW for
approximately $143.9 million, including a cash payment of
$140.6 million and transaction costs of $3.3 million.
These businesses provide thermal management solutions and
integration services to the telecommunications, data
communications, medical and security markets.
On February 23, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Water
Group, certain assets of DEP, a privately held company, for
$10.3 million, including a cash payment of
$10.0 million, transaction costs of $0.2 million, plus
debt assumed of $0.1 million. The DEP product line
addresses the water and wastewater markets and is part of our
Water Group.
In the third quarter 2005, we paid $10.4 million in
post-closing purchase price adjustments related to the October
2004 sale of our former Tools Group to BDK.
In April 2005, we sold our interest in the stock of LN Holdings
Corporation for cash consideration of $23.6 million,
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $5.2 million and an after
tax gain of $3.3 million. The terms of the sale agreement
established two escrow accounts totaling $14 million to be
used for payment of any potential adjustments to the purchase
price, transaction expenses, and indemnification for certain
losses such as environmental claims. In December 2005, we
received $0.2 million from the escrow accounts which
increased our gain from the sale. During 2006 we received
$1.2 million from the escrow accounts which also increased
our gain from the sale. Any remaining escrow balances are to be
distributed by April 2008 to the former shareholders in
accordance with their ownership percentages. Any funds received
from settlement of escrows in future periods will be accounted
for as additional gain on the sale of this interest.
Effective July 31, 2004, we completed the acquisition of
all of the shares of capital stock of WICOR from Wisconsin
Energy Corporation for $874.7 million, including a cash
payment of $871.1 million, transaction costs of
$11.2 million, and debt assumed of $21.6 million, less
a favorable final purchase price adjustment of
33
$14.0 million, and less cash acquired of
$15.2 million. This includes an additional
$0.4 million in transaction costs recorded in the first
three quarters of 2005.
On April 5, 2004, we acquired all of the remaining stock of
the Tools Groups Asian joint venture for
$21.8 million in cash, $6.4 million of which was paid
following the sale of the Tools Group. The level of return on
sales targets achieved in the second quarter of 2004 required a
payment of $0.9 million, which was recorded as an increase
to goodwill. The acquisition included cash acquired of
$6.2 million and debt assumed of $9.0 million. The
investment in the Tools Groups Asian joint venture
business was sold as part of the Tools Group to BDK.
During 2004, we paid $3.9 million in purchase price
adjustments related to the December 31, 2003 acquisition of
Everpure. The adjustment primarily related to the final
determination of closing date net assets. We also paid
$2.3 million for acquisition fees which were primarily
related to the Everpure acquisition.
Effective after the close of business October 2, 2004, we
completed the sale of our Tools Group to BDK for approximately
$796.8 million in cash, including a $21.8 million
interim net asset value increase, subject to post-closing
adjustments.
Financing
activities
Net cash used for financing activities was $117.8 million,
$43.8 million and $137.8 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Financing activities consisted primarily of
draw downs and repayments on our revolving credit facilities to
fund our operations in the normal course of business, dividend
payments, share repurchases, and cash received from stock option
exercises.
We have a multi-currency revolving Credit Facility (the
Credit Facility) of $800 million expiring on
March 4, 2010. We are authorized to sell short-term
commercial paper notes to the extent availability exists under
the Credit Facility. We use the Credit Facility as
back-up
liquidity to support 100% of commercial paper outstanding. As of
December 31, 2006, we had $208.9 million of commercial
paper outstanding that matures within 49 days. All of the
commercial paper was classified as long-term as we have the
intent and the ability to refinance such obligations on a
long-term basis under the Credit Facility.
In March 2005, we amended and restated our multi-currency
revolving Credit Facility, increasing the size of the facility
from $500 million to $800 million with a term of five
years. The interest rate on the loans under the
$800 million Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 0.625%. Interest
rates and fees on the Credit Facility vary based on our credit
ratings.
Effective following the close of business on July 31, 2004,
we completed the acquisition of WICOR. We funded the payment of
the purchase price and related fees and expenses of the WICOR
acquisition with an $850 million committed line of credit
(the Bridge Facility) and through additional
borrowings available under our existing Credit Facility. The
interest rate on the Bridge Facility and loans under the Credit
Facility during the period of the Bridge Facility was LIBOR plus
1.375%.
On October 4, 2004, we received approximately
$796.8 million of proceeds from the sale of our Tools Group
to BDK. As required under the terms of the Bridge Facility, we
used the proceeds from the Tools Group sale and additional
borrowings under the Credit Facility to pay off the Bridge
Facility. Following payment of the Bridge Facility and based on
our existing credit ratings, the interest rate on loans under
the Credit Facility decreased to LIBOR plus 1.125%.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of
December 31, 2006.
In addition to the Credit Facility, we have $25 million of
uncommitted credit facilities, under which we had drawn
$14.0 million in borrowings as of December 31, 2006.
Our current credit ratings are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
Current Rating
|
Rating Agency
|
|
Rating
|
|
Outlook
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
Stable
|
|
Moodys
|
|
|
Baa3
|
|
|
|
Stable
|
|
34
We believe the potential impact of a downgrade in our financial
outlook is currently not significant to our liquidity exposure
or cost of debt. A credit rating is a current opinion of the
creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific
financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations,
or a specific financial program. The credit rating takes into
consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or
other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes
into account the currency in which the obligation is
denominated. The ratings outlook also highlights the potential
direction of a short or long-term rating. It focuses on
identifiable events and short-term trends that cause ratings to
be placed under observation by the respective Rating Agencies. A
change in rating outlook does not mean a rating change is
inevitable. Prior changes in our ratings outlook have had no
immediate impact on our liquidity exposure or on our cost of
debt.
We issue short-term commercial paper notes that are currently
not rated by Standard & Poors or Moodys.
Even though our short-term commercial paper is unrated, we
believe a downgrade in our long-term debt rating could have a
negative impact on our ability to continue to issue unrated
commercial paper.
We do not expect that a one rating downgrade of our long-term
debt by either Standard & Poors or Moodys
would substantially affect our ability to access the long term
debt capital markets. However, depending upon market conditions,
the amount, timing and pricing of new borrowings could be
adversely affected. If both of our long-term debt ratings were
downgraded to below BBB-/Baa3, our flexibility to access the
term debt capital markets would be reduced. In the event of a
downgrade of our long-term debt rating, the cost of borrowing
and fees payable under our Credit Facility and $35 million
private placement fixed rate note could increase. While the
Credit Facility has a pricing grid based in part on credit
ratings, we do not have any agreements under which the
obligations are accelerated in the event of a ratings downgrade.
As of December 31, 2006, our capital structure consisted of
$744.1 million in total indebtedness and
$1,670.0 million in shareholders equity. The ratio of
debt-to-total
capital at December 31, 2006 was 30.8% , compared with
32.6% at December 31, 2005. Our targeted
debt-to-total
capital ratio is 40% or less.
We expect to continue to have cash requirements to support
working capital needs and capital expenditures, to pay interest
and service debt, and to pay dividends to shareholders. In order
to meet these cash requirements, we intend to use available cash
and internally generated funds, and to borrow under our
committed and uncommitted credit facilities.
We paid dividends in 2006 of $56.6 million, compared with
$53.1 million in 2005 and $43.1 million in 2004. We
anticipate continuing the practice of paying dividends on a
quarterly basis.
In December 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of shares of our common stock up to a maximum dollar
limit of $25 million of our common stock. On July 28,
2006, the Board of Directors increased our repurchase
authorization to $50 million, and on September 28,
2006, the Board of Directors further increased our repurchase
authorization to $100 million. As of December 31,
2006, we had purchased 1,986,026 shares for
$59.4 million pursuant to these programs during 2006. The
Board of Directors authorized the continuation of the repurchase
program in 2007 with a maximum dollar limit of
$40.6 million. This authorization expires on
December 31, 2007. As of February 16, 2007, we had not
repurchased any additional shares under this plan and,
accordingly, we have the authority in 2007 to repurchase shares
up to a maximum dollar limit of $40.6 million. In 2005 and
2004, respectively, we repurchased 755,663 shares and
105,500 shares of our common stock under similar
authorizations.
35
The following summarizes our significant contractual
obligations that impact our liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
22,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,546
|
|
|
$
|
251,150
|
|
|
$
|
269,066
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
200,036
|
|
|
$
|
744,061
|
|
Interest obligations on fixed-rate
debt
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Operating lease obligations, net
of sublease rentals
|
|
|
27,973
|
|
|
|
22,969
|
|
|
|
17,528
|
|
|
|
12,790
|
|
|
|
11,751
|
|
|
|
9,017
|
|
|
|
102,028
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash
obligations, net
|
|
$
|
53,230
|
|
|
$
|
25,907
|
|
|
$
|
269,472
|
|
|
$
|
282,197
|
|
|
$
|
11,831
|
|
|
$
|
209,063
|
|
|
$
|
851,700
|
|
|
|
In addition to the summary of significant contractual
obligations, we will incur annual interest expense on
outstanding variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2006,
variable interest rate debt, including the effects of derivative
financial instruments, was $247.9 million at a weighted
average interest rate of 5.7%.
We expect to make contributions in the range of $15 million
to $20 million to our pension plans in 2007. The 2007
expected contributions will equal or exceed our minimum funding
requirements.
Other
financial measures
In addition to measuring our cash flow generation or usage based
upon operating, investing, and financing classifications
included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, we also
measure our free cash flow and our conversion of net income. We
have a long-term goal to consistently generate free cash flow
that equals or exceeds 100% conversion of net income. Free cash
flow and conversion of net income are non-GAAP financial
measures that we use to assess our cash flow performance. We
believe free cash flow and conversion of net income are
important measures of operating performance because they provide
us and our investors a measurement of cash generated from
operations that is available to pay dividends and repay debt. In
addition, free cash flow and conversion of net income are used
as a criterion to measure and pay compensation-based incentives.
Our measure of free cash flow and conversion of net income may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. The following table is a reconciliation of free cash
flow and a calculation of the conversion of net income with cash
flows from continuing and discontinued operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
231,611
|
|
|
$
|
247,858
|
|
|
$
|
264,091
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(51,078
|
)
|
|
|
(62,471
|
)
|
|
|
(48,867
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
181,217
|
|
|
|
202,498
|
|
|
|
215,224
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
183,731
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
|
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
Conversion of net income
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
|
109
|
%
|
|
|
126
|
%
|
|
|
In 2007, our objective is to generate free cash flow that equals
or exceeds 100% of net income.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
At December 31, 2006, we had no off-balance sheet financing
arrangements.
36
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental
We have been named as defendants, targets, or potentially
responsible parties (PRP) in a small number of
environmental
clean-ups,
in which our current or former business units have generally
been given de minimis status. To date, none of these
claims have resulted in
clean-up
costs, fines, penalties, or damages in an amount material to our
financial position or results of operations. We have disposed of
a number of businesses in recent years and in certain cases,
such as the disposition of the Cross Pointe Paper Corporation
uncoated paper business in 1995, the disposition of the Federal
Cartridge Company ammunition business in 1997, the disposition
of Lincoln Industrial in 2001, and the disposition of the Tools
Group in 2004, we have retained responsibility and potential
liability for certain environmental obligations. We have
received claims for indemnification from purchasers of these
businesses and have established what we believe to be adequate
accruals for potential liabilities arising out of retained
responsibilities. We settled some of the claims in prior years;
to date our recorded accruals have been adequate.
In addition, there are ongoing environmental issues at a limited
number of sites, including one site acquired in the acquisition
of Essef Corporation in 1999, which relate to operations no
longer carried out at the sites. We have established what we
believe to be adequate accruals for remediation costs at these
sites. We do not believe that projected response costs will
result in a material liability.
We may be named as a PRP at other sites in the future, for both
divested and acquired businesses. When the outcome of the matter
is probable and it is possible to provide reasonable estimates
of our liability with respect to environmental sites, provisions
have been made in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. As of December 31, 2006
and 2005, our undiscounted reserves for such environmental
liabilities were approximately $5.6 million and
$6.4 million, respectively. We cannot ensure that
environmental requirements will not change or become more
stringent over time or that our eventual environmental
clean-up
costs and liabilities will not exceed the amount of our current
reserves.
Stand-by
letters of credit
In the ordinary course of business, predominantly for contracts
and bids involving municipal pump products, we are required to
commit to bonds that require payments to our customers for any
non-performance. The outstanding face value of the bonds
fluctuates with the value of our projects in process and in our
backlog. In addition, we issue financial stand-by letters of
credit to secure our performance to third parties under
self-insurance programs and certain legal matters. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding value of these
instruments totaled $59.6 million and $38.8 million,
respectively.
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See ITEM 8, Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for information pertaining to recently
adopted accounting standards or accounting standards to be
adopted in the future.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We have adopted various accounting policies to prepare the
consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in
ITEM 8, Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. Certain of our accounting policies require the
application of significant judgment by management in selecting
the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates.
By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent
degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our
historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our
observance of trends in the industry, and information available
from other outside sources, as appropriate. We consider an
accounting estimate to be critical if:
|
|
|
it requires us to make assumptions about matters that were
uncertain at the time we were making the estimate; and
|
|
|
changes in the estimate or different estimates that we could
have selected would have had a material impact on our financial
condition or results of operations.
|
37
Our critical accounting estimates include the following:
Impairment
of Goodwill
The fair value of each of our reporting units was estimated
using a discounted cash flow approach. The test for impairment
requires us to make several estimates about projected future
cash flows and appropriate discount rates. If these estimates
change, we may incur charges for impairment of goodwill. During
the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed our annual impairment
test of goodwill and determined there was no impairment.
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
We review the recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and
used, such as property, plant and equipment, when events or
changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value
of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The
assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to
recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the
expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without
interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows
are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment
loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair
value and carrying value. Impairment losses on long-lived assets
held for sale are determined in a similar manner, except that
fair values are reduced for the cost to dispose of the assets.
The measurement of impairment requires us to estimate future
cash flows and the fair value of long-lived assets.
Pension
We sponsor domestic and foreign defined-benefit pension and
other post-retirement plans. The amounts recognized in our
consolidated financial statements related to our defined-benefit
pension and other post-retirement plans are determined from
actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are
assumptions including expected return on plan assets, discount
rates, rate of increase in future compensation levels, and
health care cost trend rates. These assumptions are updated
annually and are disclosed in ITEM 8, Note 11 to the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Changes to these
assumptions will affect pension expense.
In December 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires that we
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined
benefit and retiree medical plans as an asset or liability in
our 2006 year-end balance sheet, with changes in the funded
status recognized through comprehensive income in the year in
which they occur.
Discount
rate
The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension
liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year
based on our December 31 measurement date. The discount
rate was determined by matching our expected benefit payments to
payments from a stream of AA or higher bonds available in the
marketplace, adjusted to eliminate the effects of call
provisions. This produced a discount rate for our
U.S. plans of 6.00% in 2006 and 5.75% in 2005 and 2004. The
discount rates on our foreign plans ranged from 2.00% to 5.15%
in 2006, 2.00% to 4.90% in 2005 and 2.00% to 5.25% in 2004.
There are no other known or anticipated changes in our discount
rate assumption that will impact our pension expense in 2007.
Expected
rate of return
Our expected rate of return on plan assets in 2006 equaled 8.5%,
which remained unchanged from 2005 and 2004. The expected rate
of return is designed to be a long-term assumption that may be
subject to considerable
year-to-year
variance from actual returns. In developing the expected
long-term rate of return, we considered our historical returns,
with consideration given to forecasted economic conditions, our
asset allocations, input from external consultants and broader
longer-term market indices. In 2006, the pension plan assets
yielded a return of 12.3%, compared to returns of 4.2% in 2005
and 17.6% in 2004. In 2006, our expected return on plan assets
was lower than our actual return on plan assets while in 2005
our expected return on plan assets was higher than our actual
return on plans assets. The significant difference between our
expected return on plan assets compared to our actual return on
plan assets in 2005 was primarily attributable to the
fluctuations
38
of our common stock during 2005 which approximates 10% of the
plan assets. There are no known or anticipated changes in our
return assumption that will impact our pension expense in 2007.
We base our determination of pension expense or income on a
market-related valuation of assets which reduces
year-to-year
volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment
gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which
they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the
difference between the expected return calculated using the
market-related value of assets and the actual return based on
the market-related value of assets. Since the market-related
value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a
five-year-period,
the future value of assets will be impacted as previously
deferred gains or losses are recorded.
See ITEM 8, Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information regarding pension
plans.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market
risk
Market risk is the potential economic loss that may result from
adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. We
are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
interest rates and foreign currency rates. We use derivative
financial instruments to manage or reduce the impact of some of
these risks. Counterparties to all derivative contracts are
major financial institutions, thereby minimizing the risk of
credit loss. All instruments are entered into for other than
trading purposes. The major accounting policies and utilization
of these instruments is described more fully in ITEM 8,
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our derivatives and other financial instruments consist of
long-term debt (including current portion), short-term
borrowing, interest rate swaps, and foreign exchange-forward
contracts. The net market value of these financial instruments
combined is referred to below as the net financial instrument
position. As of December 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005, the net financial instrument position was a liability of
$753.6 million and $769.0 million, respectively.
Interest
rate risk
Our debt portfolio, including swap agreements, as of
December 31, 2006 was primarily comprised of debt
predominantly denominated in U.S. dollars (97%). This debt
portfolio is comprised of 53% fixed-rate debt and 47%
variable-rate debt, not considering the effects of our interest
rate swaps. Taking into account the variable to fixed rate swap
agreement we entered with an effective date of April 2006, our
debt portfolio is comprised of 67% fixed-rate debt and 33%
variable-rate debt. Changes in interest rates have different
impacts on the fixed and variable-rate portions of our debt
portfolio. A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of
the debt portfolio impacts the net financial instrument position
but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change
in interest rates on the variable portion of the debt portfolio
impacts the interest incurred and cash flows but does not impact
the net financial instrument position.
Based on the variable-rate debt included in our debt portfolio,
including the interest rate swap agreements, as of
December 31, 2006, a 100 basis point increase or
decrease in interest rates would result in a $2.5 million
increase or decrease in interest incurred.
Foreign
currency risk
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in
foreign exchange rates because some sales transactions, and the
assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries, are
denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the euro. We held
immaterial positions in foreign exchange-forward contracts as of
December 31, 2006. We do not expect the effect of foreign
exchange rates to have a material impact on our operations.
39
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Pentair, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting to future periods are
subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria for effective internal control over financial
reporting described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2006, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was effective based on
those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm,
Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an attestation report
on managements assessment of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting for December 31, 2006.
That attestation report is set forth immediately following the
report of Deloitte & Touche LLP on the financial
statements included herein.
|
|
|
Randall J. Hogan
|
|
David D. Harrison
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
40
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pentair, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying managements report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Pentair, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
Framework). The Companys management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys Board of Directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (generally accepted accounting principles).
A companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in the COSO
Framework. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria
established in the COSO Framework.
41
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at ITEM 15 as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006, of the Company, and our
report dated February 26, 2007, expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph
relating to the Companys changes in its method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and postretirement
benefit plans in 2006 and stock-based compensation in 2005.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 26, 2007
42
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pentair, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Pentair, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows, and changes in
shareholders equity for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
ITEM 15. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated
financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed its method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and postretirement
benefit plans and as discussed in Notes 1 and 13 to the
consolidated financial statements, in 2005, the Company changed
its method of accounting for stock-based compensation.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26,
2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 26, 2007
43
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,278,129
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,248,219
|
|
|
|
2,098,558
|
|
|
|
1,623,419
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
906,250
|
|
|
|
848,021
|
|
|
|
654,710
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
541,209
|
|
|
|
478,907
|
|
|
|
376,015
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
58,055
|
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
31,453
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
306,986
|
|
|
|
323,072
|
|
|
|
247,242
|
|
Gain on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
|
|
45,565
|
|
|
|
37,931
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
255,469
|
|
|
|
283,518
|
|
|
|
210,032
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
|
|
98,469
|
|
|
|
73,008
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
183,767
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
|
|
137,024
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,248
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,047
|
)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
99,784
|
|
|
|
100,665
|
|
|
|
99,316
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
101,371
|
|
|
|
102,618
|
|
|
|
101,706
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
In thousands, except share and per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
54,820
|
|
|
$
|
48,500
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
of allowance of $34,254 and $31,053, respectively
|
|
|
422,134
|
|
|
|
423,847
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
398,857
|
|
|
|
349,312
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
50,578
|
|
|
|
48,971
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
31,239
|
|
|
|
24,394
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
957,628
|
|
|
|
895,024
|
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
|
|
330,372
|
|
|
|
311,839
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,718,771
|
|
|
|
1,718,207
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
287,011
|
|
|
|
266,533
|
|
Other
|
|
|
71,197
|
|
|
|
62,152
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
2,076,979
|
|
|
|
2,046,892
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
$
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
14,563
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
7,625
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
206,286
|
|
|
|
207,320
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
88,882
|
|
|
|
95,552
|
|
Current pension and post-retirement
benefits
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
44,093
|
|
|
|
43,551
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
22,493
|
|
|
|
17,518
|
|
Accrued rebates and sales incentives
|
|
|
39,419
|
|
|
|
45,374
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
90,003
|
|
|
|
111,026
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
521,282
|
|
|
|
524,670
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
721,873
|
|
|
|
748,477
|
|
Pension and other retirement
compensation
|
|
|
207,676
|
|
|
|
152,780
|
|
Post-retirement medical and other
benefits
|
|
|
47,842
|
|
|
|
73,949
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
109,781
|
|
|
|
125,785
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
86,526
|
|
|
|
70,455
|
|
Non-current liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,694,980
|
|
|
|
1,698,145
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares par value
$0.162/3;
99,777,165 and 101,202,237 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
16,629
|
|
|
|
16,867
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
488,540
|
|
|
|
518,751
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,148,126
|
|
|
|
1,020,978
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
16,704
|
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,669,999
|
|
|
|
1,555,610
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
$
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,248
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
56,899
|
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
|
|
47,063
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
18,197
|
|
|
|
15,995
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(11,085
|
)
|
|
|
5,898
|
|
|
|
16,736
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
25,377
|
|
|
|
24,186
|
|
|
|
6,345
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
|
|
(8,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
(5,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions and
dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
15,873
|
|
|
|
(20,946
|
)
|
|
|
26,918
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(39,354
|
)
|
|
|
(19,201
|
)
|
|
|
(51,996
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(5,052
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(18,935
|
)
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
(13,229
|
)
|
|
|
(21,394
|
)
|
|
|
4,596
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
9,556
|
|
|
|
10,357
|
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(13,784
|
)
|
|
|
4,609
|
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
19,398
|
|
|
|
16,512
|
|
|
|
11,508
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
6,886
|
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
|
231,563
|
|
|
|
248,490
|
|
|
|
250,163
|
|
Net cash (used for) provided by
operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
13,928
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
231,611
|
|
|
|
247,858
|
|
|
|
264,091
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(51,078
|
)
|
|
|
(62,471
|
)
|
|
|
(48,867
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(29,286
|
)
|
|
|
(150,534
|
)
|
|
|
(869,155
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(24,007
|
)
|
|
|
(10,155
|
)
|
|
|
773,399
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
23,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(7,523
|
)
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities
|
|
|
(110,057
|
)
|
|
|
(184,285
|
)
|
|
|
(144,563
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings
(repayments)
|
|
|
13,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
Proceeds from the Bridge Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Repayment of the Bridge Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
608,975
|
|
|
|
413,279
|
|
|
|
343,316
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(631,755
|
)
|
|
|
(395,978
|
)
|
|
|
(440,518
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
8,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(59,359
|
)
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(56,583
|
)
|
|
|
(53,134
|
)
|
|
|
(43,128
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities
|
|
|
(117,782
|
)
|
|
|
(43,777
|
)
|
|
|
(137,830
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
(2,791
|
)
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
17,005
|
|
|
|
(16,494
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
48,500
|
|
|
|
31,495
|
|
|
|
47,989
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
54,820
|
|
|
$
|
48,500
|
|
|
$
|
31,495
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-vested
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except share
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
and per-share data
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
99,005,084
|
|
|
$
|
8,250
|
|
|
$
|
492,619
|
|
|
$
|
760,966
|
|
|
$
|
(6,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,832
|
|
|
$
|
1,261,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,225
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,359
|
|
|
|
25,359
|
|
|
|
25,359
|
|
Adjustment in minimum pension
liability, net of $279 tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
Changes in market value of
derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
$0.43 per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
(8,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
(105,500
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(4,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, net of
1,150,623 shares tendered for payment
|
|
|
1,832,016
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
10,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net
of cancellations
|
|
|
341,728
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
8,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares surrendered by employees to
pay taxes
|
|
|
(105,943
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(3,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
100,967,385
|
|
|
$
|
16,828
|
|
|
$
|
517,369
|
|
|
$
|
889,063
|
|
|
$
|
(7,872
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,406
|
|
|
$
|
1,447,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,406
|
)
|
|
|
(28,406
|
)
|
|
|
(28,406
|
)
|
Adjustment in minimum pension
liability, net of $3,645 tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,702
|
)
|
|
|
(5,702
|
)
|
|
|
(5,702
|
)
|
Changes in market value of
derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
151,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of accounting change
(SFAS 123R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
$0.52 per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
(755,663
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(24,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, net of
549,150 shares tendered for payment
|
|
|
747,282
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net
of cancellations
|
|
|
289,764
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares surrendered by employees to
pay taxes
|
|
|
(46,531
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
101,202,237
|
|
|
$
|
16,867
|
|
|
$
|
518,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,978
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(986
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,555,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,471
|
|
|
|
28,471
|
|
|
|
28,471
|
|
Adjustment in minimum pension
liability, net of $1,685 tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
Changes in market value of
derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
214,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS 158, net of $8,280 tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,951
|
)
|
|
|
(12,951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
$0.56 per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
(1,986,026
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(59,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, net of
183,866 shares tendered for payment
|
|
|
310,963
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net
of cancellations
|
|
|
324,219
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares surrendered by employees to
pay taxes
|
|
|
(74,228
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2,589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
99,777,165
|
|
|
$
|
16,629
|
|
|
$
|
488,540
|
|
|
$
|
1,148,126
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,704
|
|
|
$
|
1,669,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Fiscal year
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. We report our interim
quarterly periods on a
13-week
basis ending on a Saturday.
Principles
of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Pentair and all subsidiaries, both U.S. and
non-U.S.,
that we control. Intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated. Investments in companies of which we own 20% to
50% of the voting stock or have the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies of
the investee are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting and, as a result, our share of the earnings or losses
of such equity affiliates is included in the statement of
income. The cost method of accounting is used for investments in
which Pentair has less than a 20% ownership interest and we do
not have the ability to exercise significant influence. These
investments are carried at cost and are adjusted only for
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Due to
the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual
results reported in future periods may be based upon amounts
that could differ from those estimates. The critical accounting
policies that require our most significant estimates and
judgments include:
|
|
|
the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets, including
goodwill; and
|
|
|
accounting for pension benefits, because of the importance in
making the estimates necessary to apply these policies.
|
Revenue
recognition
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and has
been earned. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists; shipment or delivery has occurred
(depending on the terms of the sale); the sellers price to
the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is
reasonably assured.
Generally, there is no post-shipment obligation on product sold
other than warranty obligations in the normal, ordinary course
of business. In the event significant post-shipment obligations
were to exist, revenue recognition would be deferred until
substantially all obligations were satisfied.
Sales
returns
The right of return may exist explicitly or implicitly with our
customers. Revenue from a transaction is recognized only if our
price is fixed and determinable at the date of sale; the
customer has paid or is obligated to pay; the customers
obligation would not be changed in the event of theft, physical
destruction, or damage of the product; the customer has economic
substance apart from our Company; we do not have significant
obligations for future performance to directly bring about
resale of the product by the customer; and the amount of returns
can reasonably be estimated.
In general, our return policy allows for customer returns only
upon our authorization. Goods returned must be product we
continue to market and must be in salable condition. Returns of
custom or modified goods are normally not allowed.
At the time of sale, we reduce revenue for the estimated effect
of returns. Estimated sales returns include consideration of
historical sales levels, the timing and magnitude of historical
sales return levels as a percent of sales, type of product, type
of customer, and a projection of this experience into the future.
48
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pricing
and sales incentives
We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs
and incentive offerings including pricing arrangements,
promotions, and other volume-based incentives at the later of
the date revenue is recognized or the incentive is offered.
Sales incentives given to our customers are recorded as a
reduction of revenue unless we (1) receive an identifiable
benefit for the goods or services in exchange for the
consideration and (2) we can reasonably estimate the fair
value of the benefit received. The following represents a
description of our pricing arrangements, promotions, and other
volume-based incentives:
Pricing
arrangements
Pricing is established up front with our customers, and we
record sales at the agreed upon net selling price. However, one
of our businesses allows customers to apply for a refund of a
percentage of the original purchase price if they can
demonstrate sales to a qualifying OEM customer. At the time of
sale, we estimate the anticipated refund to be paid based on
historical experience and reduce sales for the probable cost of
the discount. The cost of these refunds is recorded as a
reduction in gross sales.
Promotions
Our primary promotional activity is what we refer to as
cooperative advertising. Under our cooperative advertising
programs, we agree to pay the customer a fixed percentage of
sales as an allowance that may be used to advertise and promote
our products. The customer is not required to provide evidence
of the advertisement or promotion. We recognize the cost of this
cooperative advertising at the time of sale. The cost of this
program is recorded as a reduction in gross sales.
Volume-based
incentives
These incentives involve rebates that are negotiated up front
with the customer and are redeemable only if the customer
achieves a specified cumulative level of sales or sales
increase. Under these incentive programs, at the time of sale,
we reforecast the anticipated rebate to be paid based on
forecasted sales levels. These forecasts are updated at least
monthly, for each customer and sales are reduced for the
anticipated cost of the rebate. If the forecasted sales for a
customer changes, the accrual for rebates is adjusted to reflect
the new amount of rebates expected to be earned by the customer.
There have been no material accounting revisions for
revenue-recognition related estimates.
Shipping
and handling costs
Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are
recorded in Net sales in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income. Shipping and handling costs incurred by
Pentair for the delivery of goods to customers are included in
Cost of goods sold in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Cash
equivalents
We consider highly liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Trade
receivables and concentration of credit risk
We record an allowance for doubtful accounts, reducing our
receivables balance to an amount we estimate is collectible from
our customers. Estimates used in determining the allowance for
doubtful accounts are based on historical collection experience,
current trends, aging of accounts receivable, and periodic
credit evaluations of our customers financial condition.
We generally do not require collateral. No customer receivable
balances exceeded 10% of total net receivable balances as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In December 2006, we entered into a one-year Accounts Receivable
Purchase Agreement whereby designated customer accounts
receivable may be sold without recourse to a third-party
financial institution on a revolving basis. These receivables
consisted of specific invoices that were assigned and subject to
a filed security
49
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
interest. Providing collections and claims services, we act as
the agent for the third-party. Following the initial settlement
period, we are required to transfer payments and make
adjustments to invoice amounts on the assigned receivables to
the third-party on a monthly basis. We are also required to
maintain trade credit insurance on the sold receivables.
Receivable sales could occur on the settlement date or as the
third-party permits, up to a maximum total outstanding amount of
$30 million, with the ability to make additional sales as
sold receivables are repaid.
As of December 31, 2006, we had sold approximately
$30.0 million of accounts receivable to a third-party
financial institution to mitigate accounts receivable
concentration risk because the customer did not take advantage
of the early pay discounts and to provide additional financing
capacity. In compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities, (SFAS 140) sales of
accounts receivable are reflected as a reduction of accounts
receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds
are included in the cash flows from operating activities in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In 2006, a loss in the
amount of $0.8 million related to the sale of accounts
receivable is included in the line item Gain on sale of
assets, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
In December 2004, we entered into a one-year Accounts Receivable
Purchase Agreement whereby designated customer accounts
receivable could be sold without recourse to a third-party
financial institution on a revolving basis. These receivables
consisted of specific invoices that were assigned and subject to
a filed security interest. Providing collections and claims
services, we acted as the agent for the third-party. Following
the initial settlement period, we were required to transfer
payments and make adjustments to invoice amounts on the assigned
receivables to the third-party on a monthly basis. We were also
required to maintain trade credit insurance on the sold
receivables. Receivable sales could have occurred on the
settlement date or as the third-party permitted, up to a maximum
total outstanding amount of $30 million, with the ability
to make additional sales as sold receivables were repaid. The
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement was not renewed in 2005.
As of December 31, 2004, we had sold an approximate
$22.0 million interest in our pool of accounts receivable
to a third-party financial institution to mitigate the credit
risk associated with the receivable balance of a large customer
because we did not offer early pay discounts. In compliance with
SFAS 140, sales of accounts receivable are reflected as a
reduction of accounts receivable in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets and the proceeds are included in the cash flows from
operating activities in our Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows. As the estimated present value of the receivables sold
approximated the carrying amount, no gain or loss was recorded
in 2004.
Inventories
Beginning in the fourth quarter, inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market with substantially all costed using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method and with an insignificant amount of
inventories located outside the United States costed using a
moving average method which approximates FIFO. Prior to the
fourth quarter 2006, inventories located in the United States
were costed using the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) and FIFO methods, and inventories of foreign
based subsidiaries were costed primarily using the FIFO method
with a smaller amount of inventories costed using the LIFO and
moving average methods.
Change
in accounting principle
Prior to October 1, 2006, inventories in the United States
were costed using both the LIFO and FIFO methods, and
inventories outside the United States were costed primarily
using the FIFO methods with smaller amounts of inventory using
the LIFO and moving average methods. Effective that date, we
elected to change our method of accounting to cost all
inventories previously costed using the LIFO method using the
FIFO method to better reflect the current value of inventory in
the balance sheet and to provide a better matching of revenue
and expense in the consolidated statements of income. In
addition, this change results in a more unified
50
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
method of inventory costing. The result of the accounting change
was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements for all
periods presented. Accordingly, the cumulative effect of the
accounting change was recorded in the consolidated statement of
income in the fourth quarter of 2006, rather than
retrospectively applied to the prior period consolidated
financial statements.
Property,
plant, and equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at historical cost. We
compute depreciation by the straight-line method based on the
following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
|
5 to 20
|
|
Buildings and leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
5 to 50
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 15
|
|
Significant improvements that add to productive capacity or
extend the lives of properties are capitalized. Costs for
repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When
property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any related gains or losses are included in income.
We review the recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and
used, such as property, plant and equipment, when events or
changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value
of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The
assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to
recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the
expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without
interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows
are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment
loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair
value and carrying value. Impairment losses on long-lived assets
held for sale are determined in a similar manner, except that
fair values are reduced for the cost to dispose of the assets.
The measurement of impairment requires us to estimate future
cash flows and the fair value of long-lived assets.
Goodwill
and identifiable intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired
businesses over the fair value of identifiable tangible net
assets and identifiable intangible assets purchased.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis. During the
fourth quarter of 2006, we completed our annual impairment test
of goodwill and determined there was no impairment.
Our primary identifiable intangible assets include trade marks
and trade names, brand names, patents, non-compete agreements,
proprietary technology, and customer relationships. Under the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, identifiable intangibles with finite
lives are amortized and those identifiable intangibles with
indefinite lives are not amortized. Identifiable intangible
assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Identifiable
intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for
impairment annually, or more frequently if events warrant. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of
the intangible asset with its carrying amount. During the fourth
quarter of 2006, we completed our annual impairment test for
those identifiable assets not subject to amortization and
determined there was no impairment.
Cost
and equity method investments
We have investments that are accounted for at historical cost
or, if we have significant influence over the investee, using
the equity method. Our proportionate share of income or losses
from investments accounted for under the equity method is
recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We write down
or write off an
51
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
investment and recognize a loss when events or circumstances
indicate there is impairment in the investment that is
other-than-temporary.
This requires significant judgment, including assessment of the
investees financial condition, and in certain cases the
possibility of subsequent rounds of financing, as well as the
investees historical and projected results of operations
and cash flows. If the actual outcomes for the investees are
significantly different from projections, we may incur future
charges for the impairment of these investments.
Income
taxes
We use the asset and liability approach to account for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period when the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in
valuation allowances from period to period are included in our
tax provision in the period of change.
Environmental
In accordance with
SOP 96-1,
Environmental Remediation Liabilities, we recognize
environmental
clean-up
liabilities on an undiscounted basis when a loss is probable and
can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities generally are not
subject to insurance coverage. The cost of each environmental
clean-up is
estimated by engineering, financial, and legal specialists based
on current law. Such estimates are based primarily upon the
estimated cost of investigation and remediation required and the
likelihood that, where applicable, other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) will be able to fulfill their
commitments at the sites where Pentair may be jointly and
severally liable. The process of estimating environmental
clean-up
liabilities is complex and dependent primarily on the nature and
extent of historical information and physical data relating to a
contaminated site, the complexity of the site, the uncertainty
as to what remedy and technology will be required, and the
outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other PRPs
at multi-party sites. In future periods, new laws or
regulations, advances in
clean-up
technologies, and additional information about the ultimate
clean-up
remedy that is used could significantly change our estimates.
Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in Other
current liabilities and Other non-current liabilities
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Insurance
subsidiary
We insure certain general and product liability, property,
workers compensation, and automobile liability risks
through our regulated wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary,
Penwald Insurance Company (Penwald). Reserves for
policy claims are established based on actuarial projections of
ultimate losses. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, reserves
for policy claims were $54.3 million ($10.0 million
included in Accrued product claims and warranties and
$44.3 million included in Other non-current
liabilities) and $45.8 million ($10.0 million
included in Accrued product claims and warranties and
$35.8 million included in Other non-current
liabilities), respectively.
Stock-based
compensation
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R (revised
2004), Share Based Payment,(SFAS 123R)
which revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25) requiring us to recognize expense
related to the fair value of our stock-based compensation
awards. We adopted SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2005
using the modified retrospective transition method permitted by
SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, restatement of
only the
52
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
interim financial statements in the year of adoption is
permitted. We did not restate the financial information for 2004
as a result of the adoption. In connection with the adoption,
the expense in the pro forma disclosures related to stock-based
compensation was corrected for immaterial errors, resulting in
no change to previously reported quarterly pro forma earnings
per share. The adoption of SFAS 123R in 2005 resulted in
the recognition of incremental pre-tax stock-based compensation
expense of $16.4 million, a reduction in net income of
$12.0 million, a reduction in basic and diluted earnings
per share of $0.12, a reduction in cash flows from operating
activities of $8.7 million and an increase in cash flows
from financing activities of $8.7 million. We additionally
reclassified our unearned compensation on non-vested share
awards of $7.9 million to additional paid in capital. The
cumulative effect adjustment for forfeitures related to
non-vested share awards was immaterial.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, the estimated grant date fair
value of each stock-based award is recognized in income on an
accelerated basis over the requisite service period (generally
the vesting period). The estimated fair value of each option is
calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. From
time to time, we have elected to modify the terms of the
original grant. These modified grants are accounted for as a new
award and measured using the fair value method under
SFAS 123R, resulting in the inclusion of additional
compensation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Non-vested share awards are recorded as compensation cost over
the requisite service periods based on the market value on the
date of grant.
Prior to January 1, 2005 we applied the recognition and
measurement principles of APB 25 to our stock options and
other stock-based compensation plans as permitted pursuant to
SFAS 123.
In accordance with APB 25, cost for stock-based
compensation was recognized in income based on the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date
of the award or other measurement date over the amount an
employee must pay to acquire the stock. The exercise price for
stock options granted to employees equals the fair market value
of our common stock at the date of grant, thereby resulting in
no recognition of compensation expense by us. However, from time
to time, we have elected to modify the terms of the original
grant. Those modified grants have been accounted for as a new
award and measured using the intrinsic value method under
APB 25, resulting in the inclusion of compensation expense
in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Non-vested share
awards are recorded as compensation cost over the requisite
service periods based on the market value on the date of grant.
Unearned compensation cost on non-vested share awards was shown
as a reduction to shareholders equity.
Earnings
per common share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by
the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding,
including the dilutive effects of stock options and non-vested
shares. Unless otherwise noted, references are to diluted
earnings per share.
53
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated using
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common
share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
183,767
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
137,024
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,201
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common
share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
183,767
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
137,024
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,201
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding basic
|
|
|
99,784
|
|
|
|
100,665
|
|
|
|
99,316
|
|
Dilutive impact of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding diluted
|
|
|
101,371
|
|
|
|
102,618
|
|
|
|
101,706
|
|
|
|
Stock options excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise
price was greater than the average market price of the common
shares
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments
We recognize all derivatives, including those embedded in other
contracts, as either assets or liabilities at fair value in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. If the derivative is designated as
a fair-value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the
derivative and the hedged item are recognized in earnings. If
the derivative is designated and is effective as a cash-flow
hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded
in other comprehensive income (OCI) and are recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Income when the hedged item affects
earnings. If the underlying hedged transaction ceases to exist
or if the hedge becomes ineffective, all changes in fair value
of the related derivatives that have not been settled are
recognized in current earnings. For a derivative that is not
designated as or does not qualify as a hedge, changes in fair
value are reported in earnings immediately.
We use derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging
interest rate and currency exposures, which exist as part of
ongoing business operations. All hedging instruments are
designated and effective as hedges, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedge Activities, as amended. We do not hold
or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. All other contracts that contain
provisions meeting the definition of a derivative also meet the
requirements of, and have been designated as, normal purchases
or sales. Our policy is not to enter into contracts with terms
that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.
54
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Foreign
currency translation
The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside of the
United States are measured using the local currency as the
functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these
subsidiaries are translated at the rates of exchange at the
balance sheet date.
The resultant translation adjustments are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of
shareholders equity. Income and expense items are
translated at average monthly rates of exchange.
New
accounting standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges
of Nonmonetary Assets An Amendment of APB Opinion
No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions
(SFAS 153). SFAS 153 eliminates the
exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB
Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions, and replaces it with an exception for
exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153
specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance
if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change
significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is
effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15,
2005 and we adopted it on January 1, 2006. The adoption of
SFAS 153 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations, financial condition, or cash flow.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151
amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions,
the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense,
excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs be
recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they
meet the criterion of so abnormal as stated in ARB
No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the
allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005 and we adopted it on
January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 151 did not have
a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
reached a consensus on Issue
No. 03-1,
The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(EITF
03-1).
EITF 03-1
provides guidance on
other-than-temporary
impairment models for marketable debt and equity securities
accounted for under SFAS 115 and non-marketable equity
securities accounted for under the cost method. The EITF
developed a basic three-step model to evaluate whether an
investment is
other-than-temporarily
impaired. In November 2005, the FASB approved the issuance of
FASB Staff Position
FAS No. 115-1
and
FAS No. 124-1,
The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments. The FASB Staff Position
(FSP) addresses when an investment is considered
impaired, whether the impairment is
other-than-temporary,
and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP also includes
accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary
impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized
losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary.
The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2005 and we adopted it on January 1,
2006. The adoption of EITF
03-1 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial condition.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS 154) which replaces Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes
and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements An Amendment of APB
Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154 provides
guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting
changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective
application, or the latest practicable date, as the required
method for reporting a
55
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction
of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 154 on
January 1, 2006 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2005, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue
No. 05-5,
Accounting for Early Retirement or Postemployment Programs
with Specific Features (such as Terms Specified in
Altersteilzeit Early Retirement Arrangements) (EITF
05-5).
EITF 05-5
addresses the accounting for the bonus feature in the German
Altersteilzeit (ATZ) early retirement programs and
requires recognition of the program expenses at the time the ATZ
contracts are signed. The EITF offers two transition
alternatives, either cumulative effect or retrospective
application. EITF
05-5 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005 and we adopted it on January 1, 2006. The adoption of
EITF 05-5
did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and
disclosing in the financial statements tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return, including a decision
whether to file or not to file a tax return in a particular
jurisdiction. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. If there are changes in
net assets as a result of the application of FIN 48, these
will be accounted for as an adjustment to retained earnings. We
are currently assessing the impact of FIN 48 on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 addresses diversity
in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements.
SAB 108 requires that a company quantify misstatements
based on their impact on each of its financial statements and
related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years
ending after November 15, 2006, allowing a one-time
transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings
as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously
deemed material, but are material under the guidance in
SAB 108. The adoption of SAB 108 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations,
financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance
found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS 157 on our consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires that we
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined
benefit and retiree medical plans as an asset or liability in
our 2006 year-end balance sheet, with changes in the funded
status recognized through other comprehensive income in the year
in which they occur. The adoption of SFAS 158 increased
total assets by $2.0 million, increased total liabilities
by $14.9 million and decreased total shareholders
equity by $12.9 million, net of tax, in our
December 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet. The adoption
of SFAS 158 had no impact on our consolidated results of
operations.
On December 11, 2006 we entered into an agreement to
acquire all of the share capital of Jung Pumpen GmbH, a
German-based manufacturer of municipal and residential
wastewater pumps and related products, subject to German Federal
Cartel Office approval. The acquisition was completed on
February 2, 2007 for
56
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
approximately $227 million, net of cash acquired of
$13 million, excluding transaction costs and subject to a
post-closing net asset value adjustment.
On April 12, 2006, we acquired as part of our Water Group
the assets of Geyers Manufacturing & Design Inc.
and FTA Filtration, Inc. (together Krystil Klear),
two privately-held companies, for $15.5 million in cash.
Krystil Klear expands our industrial filtration product offering
to include a full range of steel and stainless steel tanks which
house filtration solutions. Goodwill recorded as part of the
initial purchase price allocation was $9.2 million, all of
which is tax deductible. We continue to evaluate the purchase
price allocation for the Krystil Klear acquisition, including
intangible assets, contingent liabilities, plant rationalization
costs, and property, plant and equipment. We expect to revise
the purchase price allocation as better information becomes
available.
During 2006, we completed several other small acquisitions
totaling $14.2 million in cash and notes payable, adding to
both our Water and Technical Products Groups. Total goodwill
recorded as part of the initial purchase price allocations was
$7.9 million, of which $2.9 million is tax deductible.
We continue to evaluate the purchase price allocations for these
acquisitions and expect to revise the purchase price allocations
as better information becomes available.
On December 1, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Technical
Products Group, the McLean Thermal Management, Aspen Motion
Technologies, and Electronic Solutions businesses from APW, Ltd.
(collectively, Thermal) for $143.9 million,
including a cash payment of $140.6 million and transaction
costs of $3.3 million. These businesses provide thermal
management solutions and integration services to the
telecommunications, data communications, medical, and security
markets. Final goodwill recorded as part of the purchase price
allocation was $71.1 million, all of which is tax
deductible. Final identifiable intangible assets acquired as
part of the acquisition were $45.6 million, including
definite-lived intangibles, such as proprietary technology and
customer relationships, of $23.1 million with a weighted
average amortization period of approximately 12 years.
On February 23, 2005, we acquired, as part of our Water
Group, certain assets of Delta Environmental Products, Inc. and
affiliates (collectively, DEP), a privately-held
company, for $10.3 million, including a cash payment of
$10.0 million, transaction costs of $0.2 million, and
debt assumed of $0.1 million. The DEP product line
addressees the water and wastewater markets. Final goodwill
recorded as part of the purchase price allocation was
$7.2 million, all of which is tax deductible.
Effective July 31, 2004, we completed the acquisition of
all of the shares of capital stock of WICOR, Inc.
(WICOR) from Wisconsin Energy Corporation
(WEC) for $874.7 million, including a cash
payment of $871.1 million, transaction costs of
$11.2 million, and debt assumed of $21.6 million, less
a favorable final purchase price adjustment of
$14.0 million and less cash acquired of $15.2 million.
This includes an additional $0.4 million in transaction
costs recorded in the first three quarters of 2005. WICOR
manufactured water system, filtration, and pool equipment
products primarily under the
STA-RITE®,
SHURflo®
and
Hypro®brands.
57
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
The following pro forma consolidated condensed financial results
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006, and
2005 are presented as if the acquisitions had been completed at
the beginning of each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net sales from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3,169,681
|
|
|
$
|
3,102,400
|
|
Pro forma net income from
continuing operations
|
|
|
184,041
|
|
|
|
188,537
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
|
184,005
|
|
|
|
188,537
|
|
Pro forma earnings per common
share continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
99,784
|
|
|
|
100,665
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
101,371
|
|
|
|
102,618
|
|
These pro forma consolidated condensed financial results have
been prepared for comparative purposes only and include certain
adjustments, such as increased interest expense on acquisition
debt. The adjustments do not reflect the effect of synergies
that would have been expected to result from the integration of
these acquisitions. The pro forma information does not purport
to be indicative of the results of operations that actually
would have resulted had the combination occurred on January 1 of
each year presented, or of future results of the consolidated
entities.
3. Discontinued
Operations/Divestitures
Effective after the close of business on October 2, 2004,
we completed the sale of our former Tools Group to The
Black & Decker Corporation (BDK). In
January 2006, pursuant to the purchase agreement for the sale of
our former Tools Group, we completed the repurchase of a
manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China from BDK for
approximately $5.7 million. We recorded no gain or loss on
the repurchase. In March 2006, we completed an outstanding net
asset value arbitration with BDK relating to the purchase price
for the sale of our former Tools Group. The decision by the
arbitrator constituted a final resolution of all disputes
between BDK and us regarding the net asset value. We paid the
final net asset value purchase price adjustment pursuant to the
purchase agreement of $16.1 million plus interest of
$1.1 million in March 2006, resulting in an incremental
pre-tax loss on disposal of discontinued operations of
$3.4 million or $1.6 million net of tax. In the third
quarter of 2006, we resolved a prior year tax item that resulted
in a $1.4 million income tax benefit related to our former
Tools Group.
In 2001, we completed the sale of our former Service Equipment
businesses (Century Mfg. Co./Lincoln Automotive Company) to
Clore Automotive, LLC. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we
reported an additional loss from discontinued operations of
$2.9 million related to exiting the remaining two
facilities. In March 2006, we exited a leased facility from our
former Service Equipment business resulting in a net cash
outflow of $2.2 million and an immaterial gain from
disposition.
Operating results of the discontinued operations are summarized
below. The amounts exclude general corporate overhead previously
allocated to the Tools Group. The amounts include an allocation
of interest based on a ratio of the net assets of the
discontinued operations to the total net assets of Pentair.
58
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004*
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
842,110
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,232
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,984
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,248
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of
discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,621
|
)
|
|
|
(4,197
|
)
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(3,585
|
)
|
|
|
(4,197
|
)
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes discontinued operations through the date of
divestiture, October 2, 2004.
|
We recorded additional pre-tax losses on the disposal of
discontinued operations of $3.6 million and
$4.2 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
respectively. The 2006 loss was primarily due to an unfavorable
arbitration ruling resulting in a purchase price adjustment
associated with the sale of our former Tools Group. The
additional 2005 loss relates to increased reserve requirements
for product recalls and contingent purchase price adjustments
associated with the sale of our former Tools Group. Income tax
benefits of $3.6 million and $4.2 million were
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The effective tax rate for discontinued operations
in 2006 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the
reversal of prior years tax reserves and research and
development tax credits. The effective tax rate in 2005 for
discontinued operations differs from the statutory rate due
primarily to research and development tax credits and permanent
book/tax differences.
Liabilities of discontinued operations consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities of discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the liabilities of $2.2 million,
represented the estimated future cash outflows associated with
the exit from a leased facility.
4. Goodwill
and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2006 by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Water
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,433,280
|
|
|
$
|
284,927
|
|
|
$
|
1,718,207
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
14,804
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
15,783
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(9,447
|
)
|
|
|
(23,232
|
)
|
|
|
(32,679
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
6,637
|
|
|
|
17,460
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,449,460
|
|
|
$
|
269,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,718,771
|
|
|
|
The acquired goodwill in the Water Group is related to our
acquisitions of Krystil Klear and several other small
acquisitions during 2006. The acquired goodwill in the Technical
Products Group is related to one small acquisition.
59
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded during 2006 relate to
the WICOR, Inc., DEP, Thermal, and Krystil Klear acquisitions.
The purchase price adjustments during 2006 included adjustments
for additional transaction and restructuring costs incurred,
valuation of intangible assets related to Thermal, and
reclassifications related to WICOR, Inc. purchase accounting.
The detail of acquired intangible assets consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
Finite-life intangible
assets Patents
|
|
$
|
15,433
|
|
|
$
|
(6,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,432
|
|
|
$
|
15,685
|
|
|
$
|
(4,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,550
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
4,343
|
|
|
|
(3,091
|
)
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
1,916
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
45,755
|
|
|
|
(8,240
|
)
|
|
|
37,515
|
|
|
|
51,386
|
|
|
|
(5,107
|
)
|
|
|
46,279
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
110,616
|
|
|
|
(15,924
|
)
|
|
|
94,692
|
|
|
|
87,707
|
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
79,060
|
|
|
|
aTotal finite-life intangible
assets
|
|
$
|
176,147
|
|
|
$
|
(33,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
142,891
|
|
|
$
|
158,715
|
|
|
$
|
(19,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-life intangible
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand names
|
|
$
|
144,120
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
144,120
|
|
|
$
|
127,728
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
287,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
266,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense in 2006, 2005, and 2004
was $13.2 million, $11.7 million, and
$7.5 million, respectively. The increase in amortization
expense between 2005 and 2004 was primarily the result of the
WICOR acquisition.
The estimated future amortization expense for identifiable
intangible assets during the next five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense
|
|
$
|
12,863
|
|
|
$
|
11,911
|
|
|
$
|
11,664
|
|
|
$
|
11,152
|
|
|
$
|
10,944
|
|
60
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
|
|
5.
|
Supplemental
Balance Sheet Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
186,508
|
|
|
$
|
146,389
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
55,141
|
|
|
|
49,418
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
157,208
|
|
|
|
153,505
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
398,857
|
|
|
$
|
349,312
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
28,989
|
|
|
$
|
24,432
|
|
Buildings and leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
181,335
|
|
|
|
168,776
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
521,245
|
|
|
|
483,639
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
38,312
|
|
|
|
21,326
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
769,881
|
|
|
|
698,173
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
439,509
|
|
|
|
386,334
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
330,372
|
|
|
$
|
311,839
|
|
|
|
Cost
method investments
As part of the sale of Lincoln Industrial in 2001, we received
37,500 shares of 5% Series C Junior Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock convertible into a 15% equity
interest in the new organization LN Holdings
Corporation. During the second quarter of 2005 we sold our
interest in the stock LN Holdings Corporation for cash
consideration of $23.6 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain
of $5.2 million or an after-tax gain of $3.5 million.
The terms of the sale agreement established two escrow accounts
totaling $14 million. We received payments from an escrow
of $0.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2005,
increasing our gain. During 2006 we received $1.2 million
from the escrow accounts which also increased our gain from the
sale. Any remaining escrow balances are to be distributed by
April 2008 to former shareholders in accordance with their
ownership percentages. Any funds received from settlement of
escrows in future periods will be accounted for as additional
gain on sale of this interest.
Equity
method investments
We have a 50% investment in FARADYNE Motors LLC
(FARADYNE), a joint venture with ITT Water
Technologies, Inc. that began design, development, and
manufacturing of submersible pump motors in 2005. We do not
consolidate the investment in our financial statements as we do
not have a controlling interest over the investment. The
investment in and loans to FARADYNE balance was
$5.4 million and $1.2 million at December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, which is net of
our proportionate share of the results of their operations. Our
proportionate share of the results of their operations is
recorded on a one-month lag.
6. Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
The following table summarizes supplemental cash flow
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments
|
|
$
|
52,957
|
|
|
$
|
44,403
|
|
|
$
|
49,339
|
|
Income tax payments
|
|
|
77,225
|
|
|
|
79,414
|
|
|
|
63,488
|
|
61
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
7. Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
adjustments, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(28,972
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,832
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
44,516
|
|
|
|
16,045
|
|
|
|
44,451
|
|
Market value of derivative
financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,704
|
|
|
$
|
(986
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,406
|
|
|
|
In 2006, the minimum pension liability adjustment increased
compared to 2005 primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 158,
as noted in Note 11. In 2005, the minimum pension liability
adjustment increased compared to the prior year despite no
change in the discount rate for the U.S. plans. The
increase was attributable to lower than expected pension plan
performance as well as a reduction in the discount rates
associated with our foreign defined benefit plans. The net
foreign currency translation gain in 2006 of $28.5 million
was the result of the weakening of the U.S. dollar against
the euro. The net foreign currency translation loss in 2005 of
$28.4 million was the result of the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the euro. Changes in the market value
of derivative financial instruments were impacted primarily by
the maturities of derivatives and changing interest rates.
Fluctuations in the value of hedging instruments are generally
offset by changes in the cash flows of the underlying exposures
being hedged.
8. Debt
Debt and the average interest rates on debt outstanding as of
December 31 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Year)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper, maturing within
49 days
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
208,882
|
|
|
$
|
144,656
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
112,300
|
|
Private placement
fixed rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
2007-2013
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
Private placement
floating rate
|
|
|
5.98
|
%
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
7.85
|
%
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.14
|
%
|
|
|
2007-2016
|
|
|
|
21,972
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
Total contractual debt obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,854
|
|
|
|
748,241
|
|
Interest rate swap monetization
deferred income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
Total debt, including current
portion per balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744,061
|
|
|
|
752,614
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,625
|
)
|
|
|
(4,137
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
721,873
|
|
|
$
|
748,477
|
|
|
|
We have a multi-currency revolving Credit Facility (the
Credit Facility) of $800 million expiring on
March 4, 2010. The interest rate on the loans under the
Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 0.625%. Interest rates and fees on
the Credit Facility vary based on our credit ratings.
We are authorized to sell short-term commercial paper notes to
the extent availability exists under the Credit Facility. We use
the Credit Facility as
back-up
liquidity to support 100% of commercial paper outstanding. As of
December 31, 2006, we had $208.9 million of commercial
paper outstanding that matures within 49 days.
62
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
All of the commercial paper was classified as long-term as we
have the intent and the ability to refinance such obligations on
a long-term basis under the Credit Facility.
We have $35 million of outstanding private placement debt
maturing in May 2007. We classified this debt as long-term as of
December 31, 2006 as we have the intent and ability to
refinance such obligation on a long-term basis under the Credit
Facility.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of
December 31, 2006.
In addition to the Credit Facility, we have $25 million of
uncommitted credit facilities, under which we had
$14.0 million in borrowings as of December 31, 2006.
Debt outstanding at December 31, 2006, matures on a
calendar year basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual debt obligation
maturities
|
|
$
|
21,022
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
250,275
|
|
|
$
|
269,066
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
200,036
|
|
|
$
|
740,854
|
|
Other maturities
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
Total maturities
|
|
$
|
22,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,546
|
|
|
$
|
251,150
|
|
|
$
|
269,066
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
200,036
|
|
|
$
|
744,061
|
|
|
|
9. Derivative
and Financial Instruments
Cash-flow
hedges
In September 2005, we entered into a $100 million interest
rate swap agreement with several major financial institutions to
exchange variable rate interest payment obligations for fixed
rate obligations without the exchange of the underlying
principle amounts in order to manage interest rate exposures.
The effective date of the fixed rate swap was April 25,
2006. The swap agreement has a fixed interest rate of 4.68% and
expires in July 2013. The fixed interest rate of 4.68% plus the
.60% interest rate spread over LIBOR, results in an effective
fixed interest rate of 5.28%. The fair value of the swap was an
asset of $1.9 million and $0.8 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively and is recorded in
Other assets.
The variable to fixed interest rate swap is designated as and is
effective as a cash-flow hedge. The fair value of this swap is
recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with changes in fair
value included in other comprehensive income (OCI). Derivative
gains and losses included in OCI are reclassified into earnings
at the time the related interest expense is recognized or the
settlement of the related commitment occurs. No hedging
relationships were de-designated during 2006.
63
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Fair
value of financial instruments
The recorded amounts and estimated fair values of long-term
debt, excluding the effects of derivative financial instruments,
and the recorded amounts and estimated fair value of those
derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
In thousands
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, including current
portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
$
|
347,920
|
|
|
$
|
347,920
|
|
|
$
|
356,956
|
|
|
$
|
356,956
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
392,934
|
|
|
|
403,807
|
|
|
|
391,285
|
|
|
|
411,253
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
740,854
|
|
|
$
|
751,727
|
|
|
$
|
748,241
|
|
|
$
|
768,209
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value of variable to fixed
interest rate swap asset
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
|
The following methods were used to estimate the fair values of
each class of financial instrument:
|
|
|
short-term financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents,
accounts and notes receivable, accounts and notes payable, and
short-term borrowings) recorded amount approximates
fair value because of the short maturity period;
|
|
|
long-term debt, including current maturities fair
value is based on market quotes available for issuance of debt
with similar terms; and
|
|
|
interest rate swap agreements fair value is based on
market or dealer quotes.
|
10. Income
Taxes
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
205,049
|
|
|
$
|
219,556
|
|
|
$
|
159,679
|
|
International
|
|
|
50,420
|
|
|
|
63,962
|
|
|
|
50,353
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before taxes
|
|
$
|
255,469
|
|
|
$
|
283,518
|
|
|
$
|
210,032
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for continuing operations
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Currently payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
51,834
|
|
|
$
|
59,355
|
|
|
$
|
42,730
|
|
State
|
|
|
9,998
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
International
|
|
|
14,273
|
|
|
|
23,796
|
|
|
|
14,513
|
|
|
|
Total current taxes
|
|
|
76,105
|
|
|
|
90,520
|
|
|
|
62,294
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state
|
|
|
(8,063
|
)
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
|
|
8,341
|
|
International
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes
|
|
|
(4,403
|
)
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
71,702
|
|
|
$
|
98,469
|
|
|
$
|
73,008
|
|
|
|
64
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to
our effective tax rate for continuing operations follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal
tax benefit
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Tax effect of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of international
operations
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Domestic manufacturing deduction
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP dividend benefit
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
All other, net
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate on continuing
operations
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes arise because of different treatment between
financial statement accounting and tax accounting, known as
temporary differences. We record the tax effect of
these temporary differences as deferred tax assets
(generally items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit
in future periods) and deferred tax liabilities
(generally items for which we received a tax deduction but the
tax impact has not yet been recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Income).
During 2006, our effective tax rate was impacted by favorable
resolution of prior years federal tax returns and higher
utilization of foreign tax credits.
During 2005, our effective tax rate was impacted by R&D tax
credits, and favorable resolution of prior years federal
tax returns. Our effective tax rate was also impacted favorably
by tax deductions for profits associated with qualified domestic
production activities. These favorable items were offset by an
unfavorable settlement for a routine German tax examination
related to prior years as well as the tax impact of the adoption
of SFAS 123R.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we repatriated approximately
$75.0 million in extraordinary dividends, as defined in the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act),
consisting primarily of foreign proceeds resulting from the sale
of the Tools Group. We elected to apply the provisions of
Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part
of the Jobs Act, to the repatriated extraordinary dividends and
therefore, were eligible to claim an eighty-five percent
dividends received deduction for income tax purposes on the
eligible amounts. The net tax cost of the repatriation of the
extraordinary dividends, recorded in discontinued operations,
was approximately $4.0 million.
United States income taxes have not been provided on
undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries. It is our
intention to reinvest these earnings permanently or to
repatriate the earnings only when it is tax effective to do so.
As of December 31, 2006, approximately $120 million of
unremitted earnings attributable to international subsidiaries
were considered to be indefinitely invested. We believe that any
U.S. tax on repatriated earnings would be substantially
offset by U.S. foreign tax credits.
65
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
The tax effects of the major items recorded as deferred tax
assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Deferred tax
|
|
|
2005 Deferred tax
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,336
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
Accelerated
depreciation/amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,047
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
36,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit accruals
|
|
|
111,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,793
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,524
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
155,834
|
|
|
$
|
215,037
|
|
|
$
|
136,604
|
|
|
$
|
213,419
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(59,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(76,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of annual income tax expense takes into
consideration amounts which may be needed to cover exposures for
open tax years. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has examined
our U.S. federal income tax returns through 2003 with no
material adjustments. The IRS has also completed a survey of our
2004 U.S. federal income tax return with no material
findings. In connection with the completion of the 2002 to 2003
federal income tax audit and the 2004 survey, we recognized
benefits of $8.0 million and $1.8 million in our
second and third quarter 2006 income statements, respectively.
We do not expect any material impact on earnings to result from
the resolution of matters related to open tax years; however,
actual settlements may differ from amounts accrued.
Non-U.S. tax
losses of $9.1 million and $5.7 million were available
for carryforward at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. A valuation allowance of $1.6 million and
$1.5 million exists for deferred income tax benefits
related to the
non-U.S. loss
carryforwards available that may not be realized as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We believe that
sufficient taxable income will be generated in the respective
countries to allow us to fully recover the remainder of the tax
losses. A majority of our
non-U.S. tax
losses can be carried forward indefinitely. The remaining
non-U.S. tax
losses will begin to expire in 2009. State tax losses of
$56.1 million and $43.5 million were available for
carryforward at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Valuation allowances exist for the entire balance of deferred
tax benefits related to the state tax losses. Certain state tax
losses will expire in 2007, while others are subject to
carryforward periods of up to twenty years.
Pension
and post-retirement benefits
We sponsor domestic and foreign defined-benefit pension and
other post-retirement plans. Pension benefits are based
principally on an employees years of service
and/or
compensation levels near retirement. In addition, we also
provide certain post-retirement health care and life insurance
benefits. Generally, the post-retirement health care and life
insurance plans require contributions from retirees. We use a
December 31 measurement date each year.
On December 31, 2006, we adopted SFAS 158 which
requires that we recognize the overfunded or underfunded status
of our defined benefit and retiree medical plans as an asset or
liability in our 2006 year-end Consolidated Balance Sheets, with
changes in the funded status recognized through other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
66
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
In 2004, under the requirements of SFAS No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments
of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination
Benefits, we recognized a curtailment expense and special
termination benefits totaling approximately $1.8 million
due to the divestiture of the Tools Group.
Obligations
and Funded Status
The following tables present reconciliations of the benefit
obligation of the plans, the plan assets of the pension plans,
and the funded status of the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
542,104
|
|
|
$
|
545,118
|
|
|
$
|
57,566
|
|
|
$
|
68,085
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
18,411
|
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
29,676
|
|
|
|
29,515
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(10,473
|
)
|
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
(6,345
|
)
|
|
|
(11,669
|
)
|
Translation (gain) loss
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
(7,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(23,880
|
)
|
|
|
(27,798
|
)
|
|
|
(3,575
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
Benefit obligation end of year
|
|
$
|
563,895
|
|
|
$
|
542,104
|
|
|
$
|
51,577
|
|
|
$
|
57,566
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
351,656
|
|
|
$
|
381,281
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
40,173
|
|
|
|
13,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset transfer
divestiture
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(18,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
3,575
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
Translation (loss) gain
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(23,880
|
)
|
|
|
(27,798
|
)
|
|
|
(3,575
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets end of
year
|
|
$
|
373,229
|
|
|
$
|
351,656
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets less than benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
(190,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
(190,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,577
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,566
|
)
|
Unrecognized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
93,398
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(16,123
|
)
|
Prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(190,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
(96,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,577
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not applicable due to adoption of
new accounting standard.
|
Of the $190.7 million underfunding at December 31,
2006, $115.0 million relates to foreign pension plans and
our supplemental executive retirement plans which are not
commonly funded.
67
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(4,183
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(3,735
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(188,941
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(47,842
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(133,041
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(73,949
|
)
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income pre-tax
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
28,745
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(190,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
(96,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,577
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not applicable due to adoption of
new accounting standard.
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit plans
was $490.4 million and $463.1 million at
December 31, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation or projected benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans with an accumulated
benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
365,615
|
|
|
$
|
344,811
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
485,204
|
|
|
|
457,932
|
|
Pension plans with a projected
benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
365,615
|
|
|
$
|
344,811
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
558,738
|
|
|
|
536,895
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
18,411
|
|
|
$
|
16,809
|
|
|
$
|
15,998
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
29,676
|
|
|
|
29,515
|
|
|
|
27,513
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
|
|
3,012
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(27,977
|
)
|
|
|
(29,443
|
)
|
|
|
(27,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition
obligation
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior year service
cost (benefit)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
Recognized net actuarial (gain)
loss
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
24,538
|
|
|
$
|
19,954
|
|
|
$
|
19,233
|
|
|
$
|
2,848
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,127
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
24,538
|
|
|
$
|
19,954
|
|
|
$
|
14,897
|
|
|
$
|
2,848
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
2,368
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
24,538
|
|
|
$
|
19,954
|
|
|
$
|
19,233
|
|
|
$
|
2,848
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,127
|
|
|
|
68
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Amounts not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost and
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (pre-tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
Prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
68,587
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
(21,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
69,139
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
(21,645
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not applicable due to adoption of
new accounting standard.
|
The estimated amount that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in
2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
In thousands
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
retirement
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
(1,421
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated 2007 amortization
|
|
$
|
3,430
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
Additional
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in minimum
liability included in
other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
(5,702
|
)
|
Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine domestic
benefit obligations at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
Percentages
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the domestic
net periodic benefit cost for years ending December 31 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
Percentages
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Expected long-term return on plan
assets
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
rate
The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension
liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year
based on our December 31 measurement date. The discount
rate was determined by matching our
69
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
expected benefit payments to payments from a stream of AA or
higher bonds available in the marketplace, adjusted to eliminate
the effects of call provisions. This produced a discount rate
for our U.S. plans of 6.00% in 2006 and 5.75% in 2005 and
2004. The discount rates on our foreign plans ranged from 2.00%
to 5.15% in 2006, 2.00% to 4.90% in 2005 and 2.00% to 5.25% in
2004. There are no other known or anticipated changes in our
discount rate assumption that will impact our pension expense in
2007.
Expected
rate of return
Our expected rate of return on plan assets in 2006 equaled 8.5%,
which remained unchanged from 2005 and 2004. The expected rate
of return is designed to be a long-term assumption that may be
subject to considerable
year-to-year
variance from actual returns. In developing the expected
long-term rate of return, we considered our historical returns,
with consideration given to forecasted economic conditions, our
asset allocations, input from external consultants and broader
longer-term market indices. In 2006, the pension plan assets
yielded a return of 12.3%, compared to returns of 4.2% in 2005
and 17.6% in 2004. In 2006, our expected return on plan assets
was lower than our actual return on plan assets while in 2005
our expected return on plan assets was higher than our actual
return on plans assets. The significant difference between our
expected return on plan assets compared to our actual return on
plan assets in 2006 was primarily attributable to overall market
performance being better than expected. The significant
difference between our expected return on plan assets compared
to our actual return on plan assets in 2005 was primarily
attributable to the fluctuations of our common stock during 2005
which approximates 10% of the plan assets. There are no known or
anticipated changes in our return assumption that will impact
our pension expense in 2007.
We base our determination of pension expense or income on a
market-related valuation of assets which reduces
year-to-year
volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment
gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which
they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the
difference between the expected return calculated using the
market-related value of assets and the actual return based on
the market-related value of assets. Since the market-related
value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a
five-year-period,
the future value of assets will be impacted as previously
deferred gains or losses are recorded.
Pension
and post-retirement related adjustments to equity
In 2004, our discount rate was lowered from 6.25% to 5.75%.
However, the change in the discount rate assumption was offset
by higher than anticipated returns on assets and thus, did not
significantly affect our shareholders equity. In 2005, our
discount rate remained consistent with 2004; however, a lower
return on plan assets as well as a decrease in the discount
rates for our foreign plans resulted in an after-tax charge to
equity of $5.7 million. In 2006, our discount rate
increased from 5.75% to 6.00% and our return on plan assets was
higher than anticipated. Before the effect of adopting
SFAS 158, we had an after-tax increase in equity of
$1.5 million. The effect of initially applying
SFAS 158 resulted in an after-tax charge to equity of
$12.9 million.
Net
periodic benefit cost
Total net periodic pension benefit cost was $24.5 million
in 2006, $20.0 million in 2005, and $19.2 million in
2004. Total net periodic pension benefit cost is expected to be
approximately $25 million in 2007. The net periodic pension
benefit cost for 2007 has been estimated assuming a discount
rate of 6.0% and an expected return on plan assets of 8.5%.
Unrecognized
pension and post-retirement losses
As of our December 31, 2006 measurement date, our plans
have $47.0 million of cumulative unrecognized losses. To
the extent the unrecognized loss, when adjusted for the
difference between market and market related values of assets,
exceeds 10% of the projected benefit obligation, it will be
amortized into expense each year on a straight-line basis over
the remaining expected future-working lifetime of active
participants
70
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
(currently approximating 12 years). The amount included in
net periodic benefit cost for loss amortization was
$3.3 million and $2.8 million in 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate
assumed for next year
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
|
11.00
|
%
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate
is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the
ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
The assumed health care cost trend rates can have a significant
effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A
one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost
trend rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage-Point
|
|
|
1-Percentage-Point
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on total annual service and
interest cost
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(173
|
)
|
Effect on post-retirement benefit
obligation
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
Plan
Assets
Objective
The primary objective of our pension plans is to meet
commitments to our employees at a reasonable cost to the
company. This is primarily accomplished through growth of
capital and safety of the funds invested. The plans will
therefore be actively invested to achieve real growth of capital
over inflation through appreciation of securities held and
through the accumulation and reinvestment of dividend and
interest income.
Asset
allocation
Our actual overall asset allocation for the plans as compared to
our investment policy goals is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Policy
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
Large Capitalization
U.S. Stocks
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
|
|
19.5%
|
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
25.0%
|
|
Mid Capitalization,
U.S. Stocks
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
17.5%
|
|
Small Capitalization,
U.S. Stocks
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
Pentair Stock
|
|
|
8.2%
|
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
International
(Non-U.S.)
Stocks
|
|
|
21.3%
|
|
|
|
21.2%
|
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
25.0%
|
|
Private Equity
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Fixed Income (Bonds)
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
|
|
9.4%
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
Fund of Hedged Funds
|
|
|
11.7%
|
|
|
|
20.5%
|
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
25.0%
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Actual asset allocation as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
We regularly review our asset allocation and periodically
rebalance our investments to our targeted allocation when
considered appropriate. From time to time, we may be outside our
targeted ranges by amounts we deem acceptable.
Equity securities include Pentair common stock in the amount of
$29.6 million and $32.6 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
71
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Cash
Flows
Contributions
In 2006, pension contributions totaled $4.3 million. There
were no contributions required or made to domestic defined
benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2006. In 2005, pension
contributions totaled $4.1 million, including
$0.3 million of contributions to domestic defined benefit
pension plans. Our 2007 pension contributions are expected to be
in the range of $15 million to $20 million. The 2007
expected contributions will equal or exceed our minimum funding
requirements.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid by the plans as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
Post-retirement
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
2008
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
2009
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
2010
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
179.3
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
Savings
plan
We have a 401(k) plan (the plan) with an employee stock
ownership (ESOP) bonus component, which covers certain union and
nearly all non-union U.S. employees who meet certain age
requirements. Under the plan, eligible U.S. employees may
voluntarily contribute a percentage of their eligible
compensation. Matching contributions are made in cash to
employees who meet certain eligibility and service requirements.
Our matching contribution is fixed at 50% of eligible employee
contributions, and is limited to 5% of employee compensation
contributed by employees.
In addition to the matching contribution, all employees who meet
certain service requirements receive a discretionary ESOP
contribution equal to 1.5% of annual eligible compensation.
Our combined expense for the plan and ESOP was approximately
$12.3 million, $8.8 million, and $10.7 million,
in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
12. Shareholders
Equity
Authorized shares
We may issue up to 250 million shares of common stock. Our
Board of Directors may designate up to 15 million of those
shares as preferred stock. On December 10, 2004, the Board
of Directors designated a new series of preferred stock of up to
2.5 million shares, Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share. No shares of
preferred stock were issued or outstanding as of
December 31, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
Purchase
rights
On December 10, 2004, our Board of Directors declared a
dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a
Right) for each outstanding share of common stock.
The dividend was payable upon the close of business on
January 28, 2005 to the shareholders of record upon the
close of business on January 28, 2005. Each Right entitles
the registered holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share
of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, at a
price of $240.00 per one one-hundredth of a share, subject to
adjustment. However, the Rights are not exercisable unless
certain change in control events occur, such as a person
acquiring or obtaining the right to acquire beneficial ownership
of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. The
72
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
description and terms of the Rights are set forth in a Rights
Agreement, dated December 10, 2004. The Rights will expire
on January 28, 2015, unless the Rights are earlier redeemed
or exchanged in accordance with the terms of the Rights
Agreement. On January 28, 2005, the common share purchase
rights issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement dated
July 31, 1995 were redeemed in their entirety for an amount
equal to $0.0025 per right.
Share
repurchases
In December 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of shares of our common stock up to a maximum dollar
limit of $25 million of our common stock. On July 28,
2006, the Board of Directors increased our repurchase
authorization to $50 million, and on September 28,
2006, the Board of Directors further increased our repurchase
authorization to $100 million. As of December 31,
2006, we had purchased 1,986,026 shares for
$59.4 million pursuant to these programs during 2006. The
Board of Directors authorized the continuation of the repurchase
program in 2007 with a maximum dollar limit of
$40.6 million. This authorization expires on
December 31, 2007. As of February 16, 2007, we had not
repurchased any additional shares under this plan and,
accordingly, we have the authority in 2007 to repurchase shares
up to a maximum dollar limit of $40.6 million. In 2005 and
2004, respectively, we repurchased 755,663 shares and
105,500 shares of our common stock under similar
authorizations.
13. Stock
Plans
Total stock-based compensation expense from continuing
operations in 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $25.3 million,
$24.2 million, and $6.3 million, respectively. The
increase in 2005 is attributable to the adoption of
SFAS 123R in the fourth quarter of 2005 using the modified
retrospective transition method and restating interim periods in
2005. The adoption of SFAS 123R in 2005 resulted in the
recognition of incremental pre-tax stock-based compensation of
$16.4 million, a reduction in net income of
$12.0 million, a reduction in basic and diluted earnings
per share of $0.12, a reduction in cash flows from operating
activities of $8.7 million and an increase in cash flows
from financing activities of $8.7 million. We additionally
reclassified our unearned compensation on non-vested share
awards of $7.9 million to additional paid in capital. The
cumulative effect adjustment for forfeitures related to
non-vested share awards was immaterial.
73
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Prior to 2005, we applied APB 25 and the disclosure-only
provisions of SFAS No. 123. The following table
illustrates the effect on income and earnings per share if we
had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation
during 2004. The estimated fair value of each Pentair option was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
Plus stock-based employee
compensation included in net income, net of tax
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
Less estimated stock-based
employee compensation determined under fair value based method,
net of tax
|
|
|
(17,958
|
)
|
|
|
Net Income pro forma
|
|
$
|
159,825
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
Plus stock-based employee
compensation included in net income, net of tax
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Less estimated stock-based
employee compensation determined under fair value based method,
net of tax
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Plus stock-based employee
compensation included in net income, net of tax
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Less estimated stock-based
employee compensation determined under fair value based method,
net of tax
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
99,316
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
101,441
|
|
The amounts shown above are not indicative of the effect in
future years since the estimated fair value of options and the
number of options granted varies from year to year.
We estimated the fair values using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, modified for dividends and using the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.57%
|
|
|
|
3.97%
|
|
|
|
2.83%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.45%
|
|
|
|
1.29%
|
|
|
|
1.54%
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
31.50%
|
|
|
|
34.50%
|
|
|
|
39.70%
|
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
4.5 yrs
|
|
|
|
3.6 yrs
|
|
|
|
5.2 yrs
|
|
Omnibus
stock incentive plan
In April 2004, the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan as Amended and
Restated (the Plan) was approved by shareholders.
The Plan authorizes the issuance of additional shares of our
common stock and extends through April 2014. The Plan allows for
the granting of:
|
|
|
nonqualified stock options;
|
|
incentive stock options;
|
|
non-vested shares;
|
|
rights to non-vested shares;
|
74
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
|
|
|
incentive compensation units (ICUs);
|
|
stock appreciation rights;
|
|
performance shares; and
|
|
performance units.
|
The Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee (the
Committee), which is made up of independent members
of our Board of Directors. Employees eligible to receive awards
under the Plan are managerial, administrative, or other key
employees who are in a position to make a material contribution
to the continued profitable growth and long-term success of
Pentair. The Committee has the authority to select the
recipients of awards, determine the type and size of awards,
establish certain terms and conditions of award grants, and take
certain other actions as permitted under the Plan. The Plan
provides that no more than 20% of the total shares available for
issuance under the Plan may be used to make awards other than
stock options and limits the Committees authority to
reprice awards or to cancel and reissue awards at lower prices.
Non-qualified
and incentive stock options
Under the Plan, we may grant stock options to any eligible
employee with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
shares on the dates the options were granted. Options generally
vest over a three-year period commencing on the grant date and
expire ten years after the grant date. Prior to 2006, option
grants typically had a reload feature when shares are retired to
pay the exercise price, allowing individuals to receive
additional options upon exercise equal to the number of shares
retired. Option awards granted after 2005 under the Plan do not
have a reload feature attached to the option.
Non-vested
shares and rights to non-vested shares
Under the Plan, eligible employees are awarded non-vested shares
or rights to non-vested shares (awards) of our common stock.
Share awards generally vest from two to five years after
issuance, subject to continuous employment and certain other
conditions. Non-vested share awards are valued at market value
on the date of grant and are expensed over the vesting period.
Annual expense for the value of non-vested shares and rights to
non-vested shares was $11.1 million in 2006,
$7.0 million in 2005, and $6.3 million in 2004.
Stock
appreciation rights, performance shares, and performance
units
Under the Plan, the compensation committee is permitted to issue
these awards; however, there have been no issuances of these
awards.
Outside
directors nonqualified stock option plan
Nonqualified stock options are granted to outside directors
under the Outside Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the
Directors Plan) with an exercise price equal to the
market value of the shares on the option grant dates. Options
generally vest over a three-year period commencing on the grant
date and expire ten years after the grant date. The Directors
Plan extends to January 2008.
75
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Stock
options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under
all plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Contractual
Life(1)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
5,872,382
|
|
|
$
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,311,766
|
|
|
|
36.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(494,829
|
)
|
|
|
19.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(296,130
|
)
|
|
|
36.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(57,553
|
)
|
|
|
38.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31
|
|
|
6,335,636
|
|
|
$
|
29.26
|
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
$
|
185,361,874
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable December
31
|
|
|
3,845,583
|
|
|
$
|
25.19
|
|
|
|
5.4 years
|
|
|
$
|
96,874,128
|
|
Shares available for grant
December 31
|
|
|
8,739,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in
2006, 2005, and 2004 was estimated to be $10.90, $11.44, and
$8.64 per share, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
options that were exercised during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was
$8.5 million, $29.5 million, and $47.5 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2006, the total unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock options was
$6.4 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.8 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $4.1 million,
$8.4 million, and $10.9 million, respectively. The
actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option
exercises totaled $3.3 million, $10.7 million, and
$17.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005, and 2004, respectively.
The following table summarizes non-vested share activity
under all plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Non-vested Shares Outstanding
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
995,792
|
|
|
$
|
24.98
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
352,742
|
|
|
|
37.77
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(237,886
|
)
|
|
|
34.33
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(42,599
|
)
|
|
|
34.16
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31
|
|
|
1,068,049
|
|
|
$
|
31.52
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there was $15.6 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.4 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, was
$8.2 million, $6.6 million, and $12.4 million,
respectively.
During 2005, we increased the contractual term of options for
one individual resulting in additional compensation expense of
$0.4 million under SFAS 123R. In 2004, we recorded
$4.4 million of compensation expense under APB 25
related to the modification of option terms for employees
terminated in association with our Tools Group divestiture.
76
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
We classify our continuing operations into the following
business segments:
|
|
|
Water manufactures and markets
essential products and systems used in the movement, storage,
treatment, and enjoyment of water. Water segment products
include water and wastewater pumps; filtration and purification
components and systems; storage tanks and pressure vessels; and
pool and spa equipment and accessories.
|
|
|
Technical Products designs,
manufactures, and markets standard, modified and custom
enclosures that house and protect sensitive electronics and
electrical components; thermal management products; and
accessories. Applications served include industrial machinery,
data communications, networking, telecommunications, test and
measurement, automotive, medical, security, defense, and general
electronics. Products include metallic and composite enclosures,
cabinets, cases, subracks, backplanes, and associated thermal
management systems.
|
|
|
Other is primarily composed of
unallocated corporate expenses, our captive insurance
subsidiary, intermediate finance companies, divested operations,
and intercompany eliminations.
|
The accounting policies of our operating segments are the same
as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. We evaluate performance based on the sales and
operating income of the segments and use a variety of ratios to
measure performance. These results are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred
had each segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during
the periods presented.
Financial information by reportable business segment is
included in the following summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
2,155,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,131,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,563,394
|
|
|
$
|
212,498
|
|
|
$
|
267,138
|
|
|
$
|
197,310
|
|
Technical Products
|
|
|
999,244
|
|
|
|
815,074
|
|
|
|
714,735
|
|
|
|
148,905
|
|
|
|
109,229
|
|
|
|
87,844
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,417
|
)
|
|
|
(53,295
|
)
|
|
|
(37,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,278,129
|
|
|
$
|
306,986
|
|
|
$
|
323,072
|
|
|
$
|
247,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable
assets(1)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
2,605,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,501,297
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,980
|
|
|
$
|
35,978
|
|
|
$
|
35,842
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
Technical Products
|
|
|
681,257
|
|
|
|
640,729
|
|
|
|
503,322
|
|
|
|
19,617
|
|
|
|
19,318
|
|
|
|
19,408
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
78,619
|
|
|
|
111,729
|
|
|
|
119,273
|
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
$
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
$
|
3,120,575
|
|
|
$
|
56,899
|
|
|
$
|
56,565
|
|
|
$
|
47,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
11,292
|
|
|
$
|
11,494
|
|
|
$
|
7,534
|
|
|
$
|
29,733
|
|
|
$
|
44,790
|
|
|
$
|
24,981
|
|
Technical Products
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,959
|
|
|
|
15,826
|
|
|
|
16,240
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
7,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
18,197
|
|
|
$
|
15,995
|
|
|
$
|
7,501
|
|
|
$
|
51,078
|
|
|
$
|
62,471
|
|
|
$
|
48,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All cash and cash equivalents are
included in Other.
|
77
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
The following table presents certain geographic
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
U.S./Canada
|
|
$
|
2,567,744
|
|
|
$
|
2,423,934
|
|
|
$
|
1,858,224
|
|
|
$
|
219,847
|
|
|
$
|
235,021
|
|
|
$
|
249,299
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
405,751
|
|
|
|
378,418
|
|
|
|
319,285
|
|
|
|
77,291
|
|
|
|
53,701
|
|
|
|
62,025
|
|
Asia and other
|
|
|
180,974
|
|
|
|
144,227
|
|
|
|
100,620
|
|
|
|
33,234
|
|
|
|
23,117
|
|
|
|
24,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,278,129
|
|
|
$
|
330,372
|
|
|
$
|
311,839
|
|
|
$
|
336,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales are based on the location in which the sale
originated. Long-lived assets represent property, plant, and
equipment, net of related depreciation.
We offer a broad array of products and systems to multiple
markets and customers for which we do not have the information
systems to track revenues by primary product category. However,
our net sales by segment is representative of our sales by major
product category.
We sell our products through various distribution channels
including wholesale and retail distributors, original equipment
manufacturers, and home centers. In our Water segment, one
customer accounted for just over 10% of segment sales in 2006,
no single customer accounted for more than 10% of segment sales
in 2005, and in 2004 one customer accounted for about 11% of
segment sales. In our Technical Products segment, no single
customer accounted for more than 10% of segment sales in 2006,
2005, or 2004.
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
lease commitments
Net
rental expense under operating leases follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Gross rental expense
|
|
$
|
39,497
|
|
|
$
|
33,651
|
|
|
$
|
27,712
|
|
Sublease rental income
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
Net rental expense
|
|
$
|
39,233
|
|
|
$
|
33,437
|
|
|
$
|
26,908
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease commitments under non-cancelable
operating leases, principally related to facilities, vehicles,
and machinery and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
28,445
|
|
|
$
|
23,441
|
|
|
$
|
17,932
|
|
|
$
|
12,855
|
|
|
$
|
11,816
|
|
|
$
|
9,017
|
|
|
$
|
103,506
|
|
Minimum sublease rentals
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,478
|
)
|
|
|
Net future minimum lease
commitments
|
|
$
|
27,973
|
|
|
$
|
22,969
|
|
|
$
|
17,528
|
|
|
$
|
12,790
|
|
|
$
|
11,751
|
|
|
$
|
9,017
|
|
|
$
|
102,028
|
|
|
|
Environmental
We have been named as defendants, targets, or potentially
responsible parties (PRP) in a small number of
environmental
clean-ups,
in which our current or former business units have generally
been given de minimis status. To date, none of these
claims have resulted in
clean-up
costs, fines, penalties, or damages in an amount material to our
financial position or results of operations. We have disposed of
a number of businesses in recent years and in certain cases,
such as the disposition of the Cross Pointe Paper Corporation
uncoated paper business in 1995, the disposition of the Federal
Cartridge Company ammunition business in 1997, the disposition
of Lincoln Industrial in 2001, and the disposition of the Tools
Group in 2004, we have retained responsibility and potential
liability for certain environmental obligations. We have
received claims for
78
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
indemnification from purchasers of these businesses and have
established what we believe to be adequate accruals for
potential liabilities arising out of retained responsibilities.
We settled some of the claims in prior years; to date our
recorded accruals have been adequate.
In addition, there are ongoing environmental issues at a limited
number of sites, including one site acquired in the acquisition
of Essef Corporation in 1999, which relate to operations no
longer carried out at the sites. We have established what we
believe to be adequate accruals for remediation costs at these
sites. We do not believe that projected response costs will
result in a material liability.
We may be named as a PRP at other sites in the future, for both
divested and acquired businesses. When the outcome of the matter
is probable and it is possible to provide reasonable estimates
of our liability with respect to environmental sites, provisions
have been made in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. As of December 31, 2006
and 2005, our undiscounted reserves for such environmental
liabilities were approximately $5.6 million and
$6.4 million, respectively. We cannot ensure that
environmental requirements will not change or become more
stringent over time or that our eventual environmental
clean-up
costs and liabilities will not exceed the amount of our current
reserves.
Litigation
We have been made parties to a number of actions filed or have
been given notice of potential claims relating to the conduct of
our business, including those pertaining to commercial disputes,
product liability, environmental, safety and health, patent
infringement, and employment matters.
We comply with the requirements of SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and related guidance, and
record liabilities for an estimated loss from a loss contingency
where the outcome of the matter is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. Factors that are considered when
determining whether the conditions for accrual have been met
include the (a) nature of the litigation, claim, or
assessment, (b) progress of the case, including progress
after the date of the financial statements but before the
issuance date of the financial statements, (c) opinions of
legal counsel, and (d) managements intended response
to the litigation, claim, or assessment. Where the reasonable
estimate of the probable loss is a range, we record the most
likely estimate of the loss. When no amount within the range is
a better estimate than any other amount, however, the minimum
amount in the range is accrued. Gain contingencies are not
recorded until realized.
While we believe that a material adverse impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows from any such future charges is unlikely, given the
inherent uncertainty of litigation, a remote possibility exists
that a future adverse ruling or unfavorable development could
result in future charges that could have a material adverse
impact. We do and will continue to periodically reexamine our
estimates of probable liabilities and any associated expenses
and receivables and make appropriate adjustments to such
estimates based on experience and developments in litigation. As
a result, the current estimates of the potential impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows for the proceedings and claims could change in the future.
Product
liability claims
We are subject to various product liability lawsuits and
personal injury claims. A substantial number of these lawsuits
and claims are insured and accrued for by Penwald Insurance
Company (Penwald) our captive insurance subsidiary.
Penwald records a liability for these claims based on actuarial
projections of ultimate losses. For all other claims, accruals
covering the claims are recorded, on an undiscounted basis, when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
information. The accruals are adjusted periodically as
additional information becomes available. We have not
experienced significant unfavorable trends in either the
severity or frequency of product liability lawsuits or personal
injury claims.
79
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Horizon
litigation
Twenty-eight separate lawsuits involving 29 primary plaintiffs,
a class action, and claims for indemnity by Celebrity Cruise
Lines, Inc. (Celebrity) were brought against Essef
Corporation (Essef) and certain of its subsidiaries
prior to our acquisition of Essef in August 1999. The claims
against Essef and its involved subsidiaries were based upon the
allegation that Essef designed, manufactured, and marketed two
sand swimming pool filters that were installed as a part of the
spa system on the Horizon cruise ship, and allegations that the
spa and filters contained Legionnaires disease bacteria
that infected certain passengers on cruises from April 1994
through July 1994.
The individual and class claims by passengers were tried and
resulted in an adverse jury verdict finding liability on the
part of the Essef defendants (70%) and Celebrity and its sister
company, Fantasia (together 30%). After expiration of post-trial
appeals, we paid all outstanding punitive damage awards of
$7.0 million in the Horizon cases, plus interest of
approximately $1.6 million, in January 2004. All of the
personal injury cases have now been resolved through either
settlement or judgment.
The only remaining unresolved claims in this case were those
brought by Celebrity for damages resulting from the outbreak.
Celebrity filed an amended complaint seeking attorney fees and
costs for prior litigation as well as
out-of-pocket
losses, lost profits, and loss of business enterprise value. On
June 28, 2006, a jury returned a verdict against the Essef
defendants in the total amount of $193.0 million for its
claims for
out-of-pocket
expenses ($10.4 million), lost profits ($47.6 million)
and lost enterprise value ($135.0 million). The verdict was
exclusive of pre-judgment interest and attorneys fees.
On January 17, 2007, the Court ruled on our post-trial
motions, granting judgment in our favor as a matter of law with
respect to Celebritys claim for lost enterprise value
($135.0 million). The Court also granted a new trial with
respect to lost profits ($47.6 million). In addition, the
Court denied without prejudice our claim for contribution to
reduce Celebritys recovery by 30% to account for its
contributory negligence, with leave to renew the motion
following retrial.
Celebritys claim for lost profits at trial amounted to
approximately $60.3 million. We believe that actual lost
profits suffered, if any, are substantially less. In a new
trial, there remain questions of causation, contribution and
proof of damages to be determined. We intend to vigorously
defend against Celebritys claims. We cannot predict
whether Celebrity will appeal the ruling on lost enterprise
value, nor whether and to what extent Essef may eventually be
found liable on Celebritys claims.
Several issues have not been decided by the Court, including
whether Celebrity is entitled to recovery of its attorneys
fees and related costs in the passenger claims phase of the case
($4.1 million), and, with respect to pre-judgment interest,
the length of the interest period and the rate of interest on
any eventual judgment. We have assessed the impact of the ruling
on our previously established reserves for this matter and,
based on information available at this time, have not changed
our reserves following this ruling, except to take into account
quarterly interest accruals.
We believe that any judgment we pay in this matter would be
tax-deductible in the year paid or in subsequent years. In
addition to the impact of any loss on this matter on our
earnings per share when recognized, we may need to borrow funds
from our banks or other sources to pay any judgment finally
determined after exhaustion of all appeals. We expect that we
would have available adequate funds to allow us to do so, based
on discussions with our lending sources and our estimates of the
results of our business operations over the foreseeable future.
Warranties
and guarantees
In connection with the disposition of our businesses or product
lines, we may agree to indemnify purchasers for various
potential liabilities relating to the sold business, such as
pre-closing tax, product liability, warranty, environmental, or
other obligations. The subject matter, amounts, and duration of
any such indemnification
80
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
obligations vary for each type of liability indemnified and may
vary widely from transaction to transaction. Generally, the
maximum obligation under such indemnifications is not explicitly
stated and as a result, the overall amount of these obligations
cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, we have not made
significant payments for these indemnifications. We believe that
if we were to incur a loss in any of these matters, the loss
would not have a material effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Others, we recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation
undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
We provide service and warranty policies on our products.
Liability under service and warranty policies is based upon a
review of historical warranty and service claim experience.
Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical
experience warrant.
The changes in the carrying amount of service and product
warranties for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
33,551
|
|
|
$
|
32,524
|
|
Service and product warranty
provision
|
|
|
48,791
|
|
|
|
40,576
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(49,190
|
)
|
|
|
(44,123
|
)
|
Acquired
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
34,093
|
|
|
$
|
33,551
|
|
|
|
Stand-by
letters of credit
In the ordinary course of business, predominantly for contracts
and bids involving municipal pump products, we are required to
commit to bonds that require payments to our customers for any
non-performance. The outstanding face value of the bonds
fluctuates with the value of our projects in process and in our
backlog. In addition, we issue financial stand-by letters of
credit to secure our performance to third parties under
self-insurance programs and certain legal matters. As of
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
outstanding value of these instruments totaled
$59.6 million and $38.8 million, respectively.
81
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
|
|
16.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
The following table represents the 2006 quarterly financial
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
771,389
|
|
|
$
|
862,022
|
|
|
$
|
778,020
|
|
|
$
|
743,038
|
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
222,508
|
|
|
|
262,689
|
|
|
|
212,487
|
|
|
|
208,566
|
|
|
|
906,250
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
78,556
|
|
|
|
107,975
|
|
|
|
60,293
|
|
|
|
60,162
|
|
|
|
306,986
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
43,071
|
|
|
|
68,633
|
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
38,622
|
|
|
|
183,767
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of
discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
41,620
|
|
|
|
68,633
|
|
|
|
34,841
|
|
|
|
38,637
|
|
|
|
183,731
|
|
Earnings per common
share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts may not total to annual earnings because each quarter
and year are calculated separately based on basic and diluted
weighted-average common shares outstanding during that period.
|
82
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
The following table represents the 2005 quarterly financial
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
In thousands, except per-share data
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
709,635
|
|
|
$
|
788,523
|
|
|
$
|
716,308
|
|
|
$
|
732,113
|
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
204,138
|
|
|
|
235,233
|
|
|
|
200,841
|
|
|
|
207,809
|
|
|
|
848,021
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
72,086
|
|
|
|
107,234
|
|
|
|
76,880
|
|
|
|
66,872
|
|
|
|
323,072
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
40,181
|
|
|
|
61,379
|
|
|
|
44,533
|
|
|
|
38,956
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
40,181
|
|
|
|
61,379
|
|
|
|
44,533
|
|
|
|
38,956
|
|
|
|
185,049
|
|
Earnings per common
share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts may not total to annual earnings because each quarter
and year are calculated separately based on basic and diluted
weighted-average common shares outstanding during that period.
|
83
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
|
|
17.
|
Financial
Statements of Subsidiary Guarantors
|
The $250 million Senior Notes due 2009 are jointly and
severally guaranteed by domestic subsidiaries (the
Guarantor Subsidiaries), each of which is directly
or indirectly wholly-owned by Pentair (the Parent
Company). The following supplemental financial information
sets forth the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the related condensed
consolidated statements of income and statements of cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006, for the Parent Company, the Guarantor
Subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and total
consolidated Pentair and subsidiaries.
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
For the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,596,642
|
|
|
$
|
722,606
|
|
|
$
|
(164,779
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,154,469
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
1,887,551
|
|
|
|
524,674
|
|
|
|
(164,688
|
)
|
|
|
2,248,219
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
709,091
|
|
|
|
197,932
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
906,250
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
24,366
|
|
|
|
385,209
|
|
|
|
131,725
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
541,209
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,600
|
|
|
|
12,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,055
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(25,048
|
)
|
|
|
278,282
|
|
|
|
53,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,986
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Net interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(63,991
|
)
|
|
|
119,461
|
|
|
|
(3,589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,881
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
40,095
|
|
|
|
158,033
|
|
|
|
57,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,469
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
13,774
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
20,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
120,484
|
|
|
|
36,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,767
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
26,285
|
|
|
$
|
120,484
|
|
|
$
|
36,962
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
|
|
84
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,810
|
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
|
$
|
39,460
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,820
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
316,157
|
|
|
|
150,103
|
|
|
|
(44,316
|
)
|
|
|
422,134
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,687
|
|
|
|
115,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,857
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
96,566
|
|
|
|
66,255
|
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
(117,602
|
)
|
|
|
50,578
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
16,766
|
|
|
|
20,555
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
|
|
(22,578
|
)
|
|
|
31,239
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
122,332
|
|
|
|
693,204
|
|
|
|
326,588
|
|
|
|
(184,496
|
)
|
|
|
957,628
|
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
|
|
4,753
|
|
|
|
214,709
|
|
|
|
110,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,372
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,978,466
|
|
|
|
61,351
|
|
|
|
134,204
|
|
|
|
(2,174,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,466,536
|
|
|
|
252,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718,771
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,050
|
|
|
|
25,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,011
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76,076
|
|
|
|
15,078
|
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
|
|
(25,380
|
)
|
|
|
71,197
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
2,054,542
|
|
|
|
1,804,015
|
|
|
|
417,823
|
|
|
|
(2,199,401
|
)
|
|
|
2,076,979
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,181,627
|
|
|
$
|
2,711,928
|
|
|
$
|
855,321
|
|
|
$
|
(2,383,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,563
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,563
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
34,649
|
|
|
|
(28,449
|
)
|
|
|
7,625
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
|
158,294
|
|
|
|
94,709
|
|
|
|
(49,770
|
)
|
|
|
206,286
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
48,447
|
|
|
|
28,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,882
|
|
Current pension and post-retirement
benefits
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,955
|
|
|
|
15,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,093
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,462
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
4,389
|
|
|
|
(32,043
|
)
|
|
|
22,493
|
|
Accrued rebates and sales incentives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,185
|
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,419
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
16,408
|
|
|
|
51,858
|
|
|
|
38,132
|
|
|
|
(16,395
|
)
|
|
|
90,003
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
89,396
|
|
|
|
324,682
|
|
|
|
233,861
|
|
|
|
(126,657
|
)
|
|
|
521,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
695,924
|
|
|
|
1,786,914
|
|
|
|
40,987
|
|
|
|
(1,801,952
|
)
|
|
|
721,873
|
|
Pension and other retirement
compensation
|
|
|
121,680
|
|
|
|
27,470
|
|
|
|
58,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,676
|
|
Post-retirement medical and other
benefits
|
|
|
23,143
|
|
|
|
50,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,380
|
)
|
|
|
47,842
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
161,360
|
|
|
|
30,780
|
|
|
|
(85,559
|
)
|
|
|
109,781
|
|
Due to / (from) affiliates
|
|
|
(453,623
|
)
|
|
|
65,884
|
|
|
|
270,531
|
|
|
|
117,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
31,908
|
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
47,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,526
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
511,628
|
|
|
|
2,423,711
|
|
|
|
681,981
|
|
|
|
(1,922,340
|
)
|
|
|
1,694,980
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
1,669,999
|
|
|
|
288,217
|
|
|
|
173,340
|
|
|
|
(461,557
|
)
|
|
|
1,669,999
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,181,627
|
|
|
$
|
2,711,928
|
|
|
$
|
855,321
|
|
|
$
|
(2,383,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,364,979
|
|
|
|
85
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
26,285
|
|
|
$
|
120,484
|
|
|
$
|
36,962
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,731
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by (used for) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
42,874
|
|
|
|
12,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,899
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
|
12,199
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,197
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10,895
|
)
|
|
|
(5,359
|
)
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,085
|
)
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
25,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,377
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
Intercompany dividends
|
|
|
(113,360
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
113,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions and
dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(4,015
|
)
|
|
|
23,799
|
|
|
|
(14,196
|
)
|
|
|
10,285
|
|
|
|
15,873
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,681
|
)
|
|
|
(22,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,354
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(8,580
|
)
|
|
|
(11,241
|
)
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
11,335
|
|
|
|
(5,052
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(13,118
|
)
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
(10,285
|
)
|
|
|
(18,935
|
)
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
(4,760
|
)
|
|
|
(9,109
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,229
|
)
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
40,491
|
|
|
|
(21,921
|
)
|
|
|
(9,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,556
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
(10,185
|
)
|
|
|
5,330
|
|
|
|
(11,335
|
)
|
|
|
(13,784
|
)
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
11,653
|
|
|
|
3,278
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,398
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(6,079
|
)
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
12,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,886
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
continuing operations
|
|
|
(39,504
|
)
|
|
|
116,858
|
|
|
|
154,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,563
|
|
Net cash used for discontinued
operations
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities
|
|
|
(39,467
|
)
|
|
|
116,858
|
|
|
|
154,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,611
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(24,623
|
)
|
|
|
(26,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,078
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(23,535
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(5,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,286
|
)
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
226,425
|
|
|
|
(85,854
|
)
|
|
|
(140,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(18,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,007
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
(4,624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,523
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities
|
|
|
182,513
|
|
|
|
(114,885
|
)
|
|
|
(177,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,057
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings
(repayments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,831
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
609,205
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,975
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(631,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(631,755
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(59,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,359
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(56,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,583
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
financing activities
|
|
|
(131,383
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,782
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
|
|
(5,857
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
41,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,500
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
8,810
|
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
|
$
|
39,460
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,820
|
|
|
|
86
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,430,598
|
|
|
$
|
640,918
|
|
|
$
|
(124,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,946,579
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,755,604
|
|
|
|
461,091
|
|
|
|
(118,518
|
)
|
|
|
2,098,558
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
674,994
|
|
|
|
179,827
|
|
|
|
(6,419
|
)
|
|
|
848,021
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
51,370
|
|
|
|
346,026
|
|
|
|
82,446
|
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
478,907
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,589
|
|
|
|
10,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(51,751
|
)
|
|
|
293,379
|
|
|
|
86,928
|
|
|
|
(5,484
|
)
|
|
|
323,072
|
|
Gain on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
Net interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(63,743
|
)
|
|
|
115,379
|
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(5,484
|
)
|
|
|
44,989
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,427
|
|
|
|
178,000
|
|
|
|
88,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,518
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
60,823
|
|
|
|
31,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,469
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,370
|
|
|
$
|
117,177
|
|
|
$
|
56,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
|
|
87
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
|
$
|
41,134
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,500
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
338,439
|
|
|
|
118,896
|
|
|
|
(34,031
|
)
|
|
|
423,847
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,007
|
|
|
|
82,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,312
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
74,116
|
|
|
|
34,039
|
|
|
|
8,154
|
|
|
|
(67,338
|
)
|
|
|
48,971
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
8,798
|
|
|
|
12,999
|
|
|
|
(5,061
|
)
|
|
|
24,394
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
85,321
|
|
|
|
652,645
|
|
|
|
263,488
|
|
|
|
(106,430
|
)
|
|
|
895,024
|
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
|
|
5,681
|
|
|
|
228,858
|
|
|
|
77,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,839
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,983,857
|
|
|
|
42,174
|
|
|
|
84,804
|
|
|
|
(2,110,835
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488,425
|
|
|
|
229,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718,207
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,084
|
|
|
|
26,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,533
|
|
Other
|
|
|
49,100
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,152
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
2,032,957
|
|
|
|
1,777,840
|
|
|
|
346,930
|
|
|
|
(2,110,835
|
)
|
|
|
2,046,892
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,123,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,659,343
|
|
|
$
|
687,718
|
|
|
$
|
(2,217,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
$
|
76,269
|
|
|
$
|
19,862
|
|
|
$
|
(93,160
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,137
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
167,256
|
|
|
|
72,531
|
|
|
|
(33,303
|
)
|
|
|
207,320
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
13,869
|
|
|
|
57,006
|
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,552
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,664
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,551
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
7,195
|
|
|
|
9,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,518
|
|
Accrued rebates and sales incentives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,374
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
31,547
|
|
|
|
61,318
|
|
|
|
23,223
|
|
|
|
(5,062
|
)
|
|
|
111,026
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
48,304
|
|
|
|
439,970
|
|
|
|
167,921
|
|
|
|
(131,525
|
)
|
|
|
524,670
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
745,162
|
|
|
|
1,710,648
|
|
|
|
12,344
|
|
|
|
(1,719,677
|
)
|
|
|
748,477
|
|
Pension and other retirement
compensation
|
|
|
75,743
|
|
|
|
28,386
|
|
|
|
48,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,780
|
|
Post-retirement medical and other
benefits
|
|
|
24,155
|
|
|
|
49,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,949
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,544
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
|
|
(67,338
|
)
|
|
|
125,785
|
|
Due to / (from) affiliates
|
|
|
(356,365
|
)
|
|
|
64,324
|
|
|
|
246,212
|
|
|
|
45,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
31,350
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
38,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,455
|
|
Non-current liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
568,349
|
|
|
|
2,461,547
|
|
|
|
540,960
|
|
|
|
(1,872,711
|
)
|
|
|
1,698,145
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
1,555,610
|
|
|
|
197,796
|
|
|
|
146,758
|
|
|
|
(344,554
|
)
|
|
|
1,555,610
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,123,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,659,343
|
|
|
$
|
687,718
|
|
|
$
|
(2,217,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,253,755
|
|
|
|
88
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,370
|
|
|
$
|
117,177
|
|
|
$
|
56,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
185,049
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
43,669
|
|
|
|
11,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
|
10,652
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,995
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(12,161
|
)
|
|
|
14,745
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,898
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
10,954
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,186
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(4,072
|
)
|
|
|
(3,929
|
)
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,676
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
(5,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,435
|
)
|
Intercompany dividends
|
|
|
23,890
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
(22,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions and
dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
(13,346
|
)
|
|
|
(23,120
|
)
|
|
|
12,554
|
|
|
|
(20,946
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,365
|
)
|
|
|
(2,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,201
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
|
8,132
|
|
|
|
17,958
|
|
|
|
(12,585
|
)
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
(13,700
|
)
|
|
|
(5,882
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,394
|
)
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
|
|
(8,880
|
)
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,357
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
(10,497
|
)
|
|
|
7,065
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
4,609
|
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,512
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(8,794
|
)
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
6,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
150,392
|
|
|
|
63,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,490
|
|
Net cash used for discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
150,392
|
|
|
|
62,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,858
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
(43,706
|
)
|
|
|
(16,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,471
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(150,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,534
|
)
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
139,641
|
|
|
|
(122,393
|
)
|
|
|
(17,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(10,383
|
)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,155
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
23,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,835
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(2,275
|
)
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
(151,553
|
)
|
|
|
(33,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,285
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
413,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,279
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(395,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395,978
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
8,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,676
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(53,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,134
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities
|
|
|
(43,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,777
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
|
|
8,901
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(11,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,791
|
)
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(1,208
|
)
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,005
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
5,570
|
|
|
|
23,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,495
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
|
$
|
41,134
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,500
|
|
|
|
89
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,868,579
|
|
|
$
|
491,260
|
|
|
$
|
(81,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,278,129
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
1,358,877
|
|
|
|
344,845
|
|
|
|
(80,489
|
)
|
|
|
1,623,419
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
509,702
|
|
|
|
146,415
|
|
|
|
(1,221
|
)
|
|
|
654,710
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
64,951
|
|
|
|
253,173
|
|
|
|
59,112
|
|
|
|
(1,221
|
)
|
|
|
376,015
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,673
|
|
|
|
7,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,453
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(65,137
|
)
|
|
|
232,856
|
|
|
|
79,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,242
|
|
Net interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(25,713
|
)
|
|
|
55,410
|
|
|
|
7,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(39,424
|
)
|
|
|
177,446
|
|
|
|
72,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,032
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(15,162
|
)
|
|
|
63,791
|
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,008
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(24,262
|
)
|
|
|
113,655
|
|
|
|
47,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,024
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,248
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,047
|
)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(24,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
113,655
|
|
|
$
|
81,832
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
|
|
90
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(24,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
113,655
|
|
|
$
|
81,832
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,225
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,248
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
36,763
|
|
|
|
9,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,063
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
15,759
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,736
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,345
|
|
Intercompany dividends
|
|
|
28,475
|
|
|
|
(9,475
|
)
|
|
|
(19,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions and
dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
9,858
|
|
|
|
7,778
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
26,918
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,865
|
)
|
|
|
(8,131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,996
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(3,527
|
)
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
4,728
|
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
20,412
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
(7,355
|
)
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,596
|
|
Accrued product claims and
warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(11,633
|
)
|
|
|
(5,778
|
)
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
4,980
|
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,508
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
6,371
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
|
8,537
|
|
|
|
165,345
|
|
|
|
75,551
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
250,163
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,928
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
8,537
|
|
|
|
165,345
|
|
|
|
89,479
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
264,091
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,886
|
)
|
|
|
(32,254
|
)
|
|
|
(14,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,867
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(858,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,381
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(869,155
|
)
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
230,841
|
|
|
|
(131,066
|
)
|
|
|
(133,246
|
)
|
|
|
33,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
773,099
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,399
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities
|
|
|
143,280
|
|
|
|
(162,992
|
)
|
|
|
(158,322
|
)
|
|
|
33,471
|
|
|
|
(144,563
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings
(repayments)
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
Proceeds from the Bridge Facility
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Repayment of the Bridge Facility
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
343,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,316
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(440,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440,518
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(43,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,128
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities
|
|
|
(137,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,830
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
|
|
(15,065
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
51,012
|
|
|
|
(34,201
|
)
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
(17,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,494
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
3,373
|
|
|
|
3,155
|
|
|
|
41,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,989
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
2,295
|
|
|
$
|
5,570
|
|
|
$
|
23,630
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,495
|
|
|
|
91
Pentair,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
(continued)
On February 2, 2007, we acquired, as part of our Water
Group, all the outstanding shares of capital stock of Jung
Pumpen GmbH (Jung) for approximately
$227 million, net of cash acquired of $13 million,
excluding transaction costs and subject to a post-closing net
asset value adjustment. Jung is a leading German manufacturer of
wastewater products for municipal and residential markets. Jung
brings to Pentair its strong application engineering expertise
and a complementary product offering, including a new line of
water re-use products, submersible wastewater and drainage
pumps, wastewater disposal units and tanks. Jung also brings to
Pentair its well-known European presence, a
state-of-the-art
training facility in Germany, and sales offices in Germany,
Austria, France, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia.
92
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the year ended
December 31, 2006, pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the year
ended December 31, 2006 to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported,
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal
executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The report of management required under this ITEM 9A is
contained in ITEM 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
under the caption Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
Attestation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The attestation report required under this ITEM 9A is
contained in ITEM 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
under the caption Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
93
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required under this item with respect to directors
is contained in our Proxy Statement for our 2007 annual meeting
of shareholders under the captions Corporate Governance
Matters, Election of Certain Directors and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required under this item with respect to executive
officers is contained in Part I of this
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant.
Our Board of Directors has adopted Pentairs Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics and designated it as the code of
ethics for the Companys Chief Executive Officer and senior
financial officers. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also
applies to all employees and directors in accordance with New
York Stock Exchange Listing Standards. We have posted a copy of
Pentairs Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.pentair.com/code.html. Pentairs Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available in print to any
shareholder who requests it in writing from our Corporate
Secretary. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements
under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding amendments to, or waivers from, Pentairs Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our
website at www.pentair.com/code.html.
We are not including the information contained on our website as
part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this report.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information required under this item is contained in our Proxy
Statement for our 2007 annual meeting of shareholders under the
captions Corporate Governance Matters
Compensation Committee, Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, Compensation Committee Report,
Executive Compensation and Director
Compensation and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information on security ownership required under this item is
contained in our Proxy Statement for our 2007 annual meeting of
shareholders under the caption Security Ownership
and is incorporated herein by reference.
94
The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2006,
information about compensation plans under which equity
securities of Pentair are authorized for issuance:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities Reflected
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
6,287,636
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
29.394
|
|
|
|
8,739,681
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
48,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
11.375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,335,636
|
|
|
$
|
29.257
|
|
|
|
8,739,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents options to purchase shares of common stock granted
under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the Outside Directors
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents securities remaining available for issuance under the
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and Outside Directors Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan. No more than 20% of the shares available for
issuance under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (1,616,979 under
the current plan) may be used to make awards other than stock
options. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents options to purchase common stock granted pursuant to
an individual stock option agreement described below. |
Individual Stock Option Agreement. On
January 2, 2001, the Company awarded Randall J. Hogan
(currently the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer) an option to purchase 48,000 shares of common
stock pursuant to an individual stock option agreement. These
options have an exercise price of $11.375 per share and
vested in three equal annual installments, commencing one year
after the date of grant. The options expire 10 years after
the date of grant and the exercise price of the options was the
closing price of common stock on the date of grant. If a
Change in Control (as defined in the Companys
Key Executive Employment and Severance Agreements) of the
Company occurs, then all the options not yet exercised become
immediately exercisable. All share numbers and per share amounts
described in this section have been changed to reflect the
Companys
2-for-1
stock split in 2004.
Burn Rate. Our three-year average burn rate is
approximately 2.60% when calculated using the guidelines
published by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Under ISS
guidelines, the burn-rate is the total number of
equity awards granted in any given year divided by the number of
common shares outstanding, with a premium applied to grants of
restricted stock. The number of equity awards used in the burn
rate calculation is not discounted by cancelled or forfeited
options or shares acquired or retained by the Company.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information required under this item is contained in our Proxy
Statement for our 2007 annual meeting of shareholders under the
captions Corporate Governance Matters
Independent Directors, Corporate Governance
Matters Related Party Transactions and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information required under this item is contained in our Proxy
Statement for our 2007 annual meeting of shareholders under the
caption Audit Committee Disclosure and is
incorporated herein by reference.
95
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
(a) |
List of documents filed as part of this report:
|
(1) Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission have been omitted because they are not applicable or
the required information is shown in the financial statements or
notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
The exhibits of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
included herein are set forth on the attached Exhibit Index
beginning on page 80.
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on February 26, 2007.
PENTAIR, INC.
David D. Harrison
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, on
February 26, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Randall
J. Hogan
Randall
J. Hogan
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
D. Harrison
David
D. Harrison
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Glynis
A. Bryan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
J. Cathcart
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Barbara
B. Grogan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Charles
A. Haggerty
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
David
A. Jones
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Augusto
Meozzi
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Ronald
L. Merriman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
William
T. Monahan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Karen
E. Welke
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ Louis
L. Ainsworth
Louis
L. Ainsworth
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
|
|
97
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Pentair,
Inc. and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
|
|
|
End of
|
|
In thousands
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Add (deduct)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
14,017
|
|
|
$
|
3,034
|
|
|
$
|
2,918
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
515
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
14,648
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
18,775
|
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
|
$
|
5,931
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)(2)
|
|
$
|
14,017
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
12,564
|
|
|
$
|
2,663
|
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
5,881
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
18,775
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off,
net of recoveries.
|
|
(2) |
|
Result of acquisitions and foreign
currency effects.
|
98
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Second Restated Articles of
Incorporation as amended through May 1, 2002 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in Pentairs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2002).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Third Amended and Superceding
By-Laws as amended through May 1, 2002 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 contained in Pentairs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2002).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Statement of Resolution of the
Board of Directors Establishing the Series and Fixing the
Relative Rights and Preferences of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 10, 2004).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
December 10, 2004 between Pentair, Inc. and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
contained in Pentairs Registration Statement on
Form 8-A,
dated as of December 31, 2004).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Indenture, dated
June 1, 1999, between Pentair, Inc. and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee Agent (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 contained in Pentairs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated
as of July 25, 2003 for $50,000,000 4.93% Senior
Notes, Series A, due July 25, 2013, $100,000,000
Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series B, due July 25,
2013, and $50,000,000 5.03% Senior Notes, Series C,
due October 15, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 25, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Supplemental Indenture between
Pentair, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, dated as of August 2, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 contained in Pentairs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2004).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of March 4, 2005 among Pentair, Inc.,
various subsidiaries of Pentair, Inc. and various financial
institutions therein and Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 contained in Pentairs
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 4, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
First Amendment to
Note Purchase agreement dated July 19, 2005 by and
among Pentair, Inc. and the undersigned holders (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4 contained in Pentairs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Pentairs Supplemental
Employee Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective
August 23, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Pentairs 1999 Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective
August 23, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Pentairs Restoration Plan as
Amended and Restated effective August 23, 2000
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 contained in
Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Pentair, Inc.
Outside Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as amended
through February 27, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 contained in Pentairs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Pentair, Inc. Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 contained in
Pentairs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995).*
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Trust Agreement for Pentair,
Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan between Pentair,
Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 contained in Pentairs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995).*
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amendment effective
August 23, 2000 to Pentairs Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan effective January 1, 1996 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.8 contained in Pentairs
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Pentair, Inc. Executive Officer
Performance Plan as Amended and Restated, effective
January 1, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to
Appendix 1 contained in Pentairs Proxy Statement for
its 2003 annual meeting of shareholders).*
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Pentairs Management
Incentive Plan as amended and restated January 1, 2002
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 contained in
Pentairs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).*
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment effective
January 1, 2003 to Pentairs Management Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 contained in
Pentairs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Pentairs Flexible Perquisite
Program as amended effective January 1, 1989 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.20 contained in Pentairs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1989).*
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Key Executive Employment
and Severance Agreement effective August 23, 2000 for
Randall J. Hogan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Key Executive Employment
and Severance Agreement effective August 23, 2000 for Louis
Ainsworth, Richard J. Cathcart, Michael V. Schrock, Karen A.
Durant, David D. Harrison, Frederick S. Koury, Michael G. Meyer,
and Jack J. Dempsey (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 21, 2000).*
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Key Executive Employment
and Severance Agreement effective as of February 12, 2007
for John L. Stauch.*
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
October 17, 2001, between Pentair, Inc. and Richard J.
Cathcart. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31
contained in Pentairs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2001).*
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Pentair, Inc. International Stock
Purchase and Bonus Plan, as Amend and Restated, effective
May 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Appendix I
contained in Pentairs Proxy Statement for its 2004 annual
meeting of shareholders).*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Pentair, Inc. Compensation Plan
for Non-Employee Directors, as Amended and Restated, effective
May 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Appendix F
contained in Pentairs Proxy Statement for its 2004 annual
meeting of shareholders).*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Pentair, Inc. Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective May 1,
2004 (Incorporated by reference to Appendix G contained in
Pentairs Proxy Statement for its 2004 annual meeting of
shareholders).*
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Pentair, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase and Bonus Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective
May 1, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Appendix H
contained in Pentairs Proxy Statement for its 2004 annual
meeting of shareholders).*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment effective
December 10, 2004 to the Pentair, Inc. Outside
Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 10, 2004).*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Summary of Board of Director
Compensation, approved December 10, 2004 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 contained in Pentairs
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 10, 2004).*
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
January 6, 2005, between Pentair, Inc. and Michael Schrock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 contained in
Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2005).*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Confidentiality and
Non-Competition Agreement, dated January 6, 2005, between
Pentair, Inc. and Michael Schrock (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 contained in Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2005).*
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
March 31, 2006, between Pentair, Inc. and Karen Durant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in
Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 5, 2006).*
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Confidentiality and
Non-Competition Agreement, dated April 1, 2006, between
Pentair and Karen Durant (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Pentairs Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 5, 2006).*
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Amendment effective
December 14, 2006 to the Pentair, Inc. Outside
Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors.*
|
|
18
|
|
|
Letter dated February 26,
2007 from Deloitte & Touche LLP related to a change in
accounting principle for valuing inventory.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Pentair subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche
LLP.
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
A management contract or compensatory contract. |
101