e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
2008. |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM_______________ TO_______________. |
Commission File Number: 0-26176
DISH Network Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
88-0336997 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
9601 South Meridian Boulevard |
|
|
Englewood, Colorado
|
|
80112 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(303) 723-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is
a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 1, 2008, the registrants outstanding common stock consisted of 210,818,875 shares of
Class A common stock and 238,435,208 shares of Class B common stock.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 throughout this report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement
of historical fact (such as when we describe what we believe, intend, plan, estimate,
expect or anticipate will occur, and other similar statements), you must remember that our
expectations may not be achieved, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee
that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will
happen at all. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual
future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results
will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
We face intense and increasing competition from satellite and cable television providers
as well as new competitors, including telephone companies; our competitors are increasingly
offering video service bundled with 2-way high-speed Internet access and telephone services
that consumers may find attractive and which are likely to further increase competition.
We also expect to face increasing competition from content and other providers who
distribute video services directly to consumers over the Internet. |
|
|
|
|
As technology changes, and in order to remain competitive, we will have to upgrade or
replace some, or all, subscriber equipment periodically and make substantial investments in
our infrastructure. For example, the increase in demand for high definition (HD)
programming requires not only upgrades to customer premises equipment but also substantial
increases in satellite capacity. We may not be able to pass on to our customers the entire
cost of these upgrades and there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively
compete with the HD programming offerings of our competitors. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar), which was owned by us prior to its January
1, 2008 separation from us (the Spin-off), to design and develop set-top boxes and to
provide transponder leasing, digital broadcast operations and other services for us.
EchoStar is our sole supplier of digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations.
Equipment, transponder leasing and digital broadcast operations costs may increase beyond
our current expectations; we may be unable to renew agreements on acceptable terms or at
all; EchoStars inability to develop and produce, or our inability to obtain, equipment
with the latest technology, or our inability to obtain transponder leasing and digital
broadcast operations and other services from third parties, could affect our subscriber
acquisition and churn and cause related revenue to decline. |
|
|
|
|
DISH Network® subscriber growth may continue to decrease and subscriber turnover may
increase due to a variety of factors, including several, such as increasing competition and
worsening economic conditions, that are outside of our control and others, such as our own
operational inefficiencies and customer satisfaction with our products and services, that
will require us to make significant investments and expenditures, which may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Subscriber acquisition and retention costs may increase; the competitive environment may
require us to increase promotional and retention spending or accept lower subscriber
acquisitions and higher subscriber churn; we may also have difficulty controlling other
costs of continuing to maintain and grow our subscriber base. |
|
|
|
|
Satellite programming signals are subject to theft and we are vulnerable to subscriber
fraud; theft of service will continue and could increase in the future, causing us to lose
subscribers and revenue and to incur higher costs. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on others to produce the programming we distribute to our subscribers;
programming costs may increase beyond our current expectations and we may be unable to
obtain or renew programming agreements on acceptable terms or at all; existing programming
agreements could be subject to cancellation; we may be denied access to sports programming;
foreign programming is increasingly offered on other platforms; our inability to obtain or
renew attractive programming could cause our subscriber additions and related revenue to
decline and could cause our subscriber turnover to increase. |
i
|
|
|
We depend on Federal Communications Commission (FCC) program access rules and the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 as Amended to secure nondiscriminatory access to programming
produced by others, neither of which ensure that we have fair access to all programming that
we need to remain competitive. |
|
|
|
|
Our industry is heavily regulated by the FCC. Those regulations could become more
burdensome at any time, causing us to expend additional resources on compliance. |
|
|
|
|
We have made significant commitments to acquire 700 MHz wireless licenses and will be
required to make significant additional investments to commercialize these licenses. |
|
|
|
|
We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market
conditions. Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult for
issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets at reasonable
rates. We cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the
future by the current conditions, which may adversely affect our ability to refinance our
indebtedness, including our indebtedness that is subject to repayment or repurchase in
2008, or to secure additional financing to support our growth initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in auction rate securities and
mortgage backed securities. The markets associated with these investments have experienced
zero or greatly reduced liquidity in recent months. Should the credit ratings of these
securities deteriorate or the lack of liquidity in the marketplace become prolonged, we may
deem any declines in fair value to be other than temporary and would then record them as
impairment charges. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unsuccessful in subsequent appeals in the Tivo case or in defending against
claims that our alternate technology infringes Tivos patent, we could be prohibited from
distributing DVRs or be required to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features
that we currently offer to consumers. The adverse affect on our business could be
material. We could also have to pay substantial additional damages. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross subscriber additions and several other key operating and financial performance
metrics could be adversely affected if AT&T were to discontinue selling our services or
reduce their marketing of our services. |
|
|
|
|
If our EchoStar X satellite experienced a significant failure, we could lose the ability
to deliver local network channels in many markets; if any of our other owned or leased satellites
experienced a significant failure, we could lose the ability to provide other critical programming
to the continental United States. |
|
|
|
|
Our satellite launches may be delayed or fail, or our owned or leased satellites may
fail in orbit prior to the end of their scheduled lives causing extended interruptions of
some of the channels we offer. |
|
|
|
|
We currently do not have commercial insurance covering losses incurred from the failure
of satellite launches and/or in-orbit satellites we own or lease. |
|
|
|
|
Service interruptions arising from technical anomalies on satellites or on-ground
components of our direct broadcast satellite system, or caused by war, terrorist activities
or natural disasters, may cause customer cancellations or otherwise harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
We depend heavily on complex information technologies; weaknesses in our information
technology systems could have an adverse impact on our business; we may have difficulty
attracting and retaining qualified personnel to maintain our information technology
infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
We may face actual or perceived conflicts of interest with EchoStar in a number of areas
relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including: (i) cross officerships,
directorships and stock ownership, (ii) intercompany transactions, (iii) intercompany
agreements, including those that were entered into in connection with the Spin-off and (iv)
future business opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on key personnel including Charles W. Ergen, our chairman and chief executive
officer, and other executives, certain of whom will for some period also have
responsibilities with EchoStar through their positions at EchoStar or our management
services agreement with EchoStar. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to obtain needed retransmission consents, FCC authorizations or export
licenses, and we may lose our current or future authorizations. |
ii
|
|
|
We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant
adverse impact on our business. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to obtain patent licenses from holders of intellectual property or
redesign our products to avoid patent infringement. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on telecommunications providers, independent retailers and others to solicit
orders for DISH Network services. Certain of these resellers account for a significant
percentage of our total new subscriber acquisitions. A number of these resellers are not
exclusive to us and also offer competitors products and services. Loss of one or more of
these relationships could have an adverse effect on our net new subscriber additions and
certain of our other key operating metrics because we may not be able to develop comparable
alternative distribution channels. |
|
|
|
|
We are highly leveraged and subject to numerous constraints on our ability to raise
additional debt. |
|
|
|
|
We may pursue acquisitions, business combinations, strategic partnerships, divestitures
and other significant transactions that involve uncertainties; these transactions may
require us to raise additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms.
These transactions, which could become substantial over time, involve a high degree of risk
and could expose us to significant financial losses if the underlying ventures are not
successful. |
|
|
|
|
Weakness in the global or U.S. economy may harm our business generally, and adverse
political or economic developments, including increased mortgage defaults as a result of
subprime lending practices and increasing oil prices, may impact some of our markets. |
|
|
|
|
We periodically evaluate and test our internal control over financial reporting in order
to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Although our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2007, and while no change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, if
in the future we are unable to report that our internal control over financial reporting is
effective (or if our auditors do not agree with our assessment of the effectiveness of, or
are unable to express an opinion on, our internal control over financial reporting), we
could lose investor confidence in our financial reports, which could have a material
adverse effect on our stock price and our business. |
|
|
|
|
We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking
statements wherever they appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks described
herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no
responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference
herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.
In this report, the words DISH Network, the Company, we, our and us refer to DISH Network
Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. EchoStar refers to
EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries.
iii
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
989,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,180,818 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
578,968 |
|
|
|
1,607,378 |
|
Trade accounts receivable other, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts
of $12,456 and $14,019, respectively |
|
|
667,649 |
|
|
|
699,101 |
|
Trade accounts receivable EchoStar |
|
|
280,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
319,622 |
|
|
|
306,915 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
86,871 |
|
|
|
342,813 |
|
Other current assets (Note 7) |
|
|
200,493 |
|
|
|
108,113 |
|
Other current assets EchoStar |
|
|
6,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,130,322 |
|
|
|
4,245,138 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
171,082 |
|
|
|
172,520 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,441,604 and $3,591,594, respectively |
|
|
2,534,973 |
|
|
|
4,058,189 |
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
679,570 |
|
|
|
845,564 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,875 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,917 |
|
Long-term deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
155,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net (Note 5) |
|
|
186,909 |
|
|
|
289,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,865,438 |
|
|
$ |
10,086,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable other |
|
$ |
259,409 |
|
|
$ |
314,825 |
|
Trade accounts payable EchoStar |
|
|
478,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue and other |
|
|
870,643 |
|
|
|
857,846 |
|
Accrued programming |
|
|
1,020,509 |
|
|
|
914,074 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
591,932 |
|
|
|
587,942 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
10,070 |
|
|
|
50,454 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2010 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,730,862 |
|
|
|
4,225,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 3/8% Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
7% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
206,238 |
|
|
|
550,250 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,493 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
341,102 |
|
|
|
259,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
4,572,340 |
|
|
|
5,221,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,303,202 |
|
|
|
9,446,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 255,810,986
and 255,138,160 shares issued, 210,798,186 and 210,125,360 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized,
238,435,208 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
Class C common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,057,924 |
|
|
|
2,033,865 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(26,408 |
) |
|
|
46,698 |
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(3,113,169 |
) |
|
|
(84,456 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(1,361,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,361,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(2,437,764 |
) |
|
|
639,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
6,865,438 |
|
|
$ |
10,086,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,810,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,552,063 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
25,052 |
|
|
|
92,922 |
|
Equipment sales EchoStar |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,844,394 |
|
|
|
2,644,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 10) |
|
|
1,444,641 |
|
|
|
1,328,621 |
|
Satellite and transmission expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 10): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar |
|
|
78,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7,664 |
|
|
|
34,919 |
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
62,756 |
|
Subscriber acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 10) |
|
|
30,787 |
|
|
|
27,974 |
|
Other subscriber promotion subsidies |
|
|
280,197 |
|
|
|
322,732 |
|
Subscriber acquisition advertising |
|
|
63,972 |
|
|
|
50,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
374,956 |
|
|
|
401,085 |
|
General and administrative EchoStar |
|
|
13,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
115,760 |
|
|
|
157,287 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 10) |
|
|
272,368 |
|
|
|
320,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,339,226 |
|
|
|
2,304,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
505,168 |
|
|
|
340,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
33,432 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(89,812 |
) |
|
|
(119,500 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(7,028 |
) |
|
|
(1,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(82,739 |
) |
|
|
(87,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
422,429 |
|
|
|
252,294 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(163,846 |
) |
|
|
(95,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
448,803 |
|
|
|
446,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
460,218 |
|
|
|
455,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization. |
|
|
272,368 |
|
|
|
320,119 |
|
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Non-cash, stock-based compensation recognized |
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
14,520 |
|
|
|
74,925 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
Change in noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
Change in long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
81,446 |
|
|
|
(8,532 |
) |
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net |
|
|
267,450 |
|
|
|
(50,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
905,737 |
|
|
|
504,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable investment securities |
|
|
(237,356 |
) |
|
|
(955,578 |
) |
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities |
|
|
217,064 |
|
|
|
865,819 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(266,771 |
) |
|
|
(330,784 |
) |
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
2,390 |
|
Purchase of strategic investments included in noncurrent assets and other |
|
|
(115,253 |
) |
|
|
(41,775 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(404,962 |
) |
|
|
(459,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of cash and cash equivalents to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (Note 1) |
|
|
(690,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of 5 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(999,985 |
) |
Repayment of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
(9,346 |
) |
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and Class A common stock issued
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
Excess tax benefits recognized on stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
(691,915 |
) |
|
|
(1,002,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(191,140 |
) |
|
|
(957,908 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,180,818 |
|
|
|
1,923,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
989,678 |
|
|
$ |
965,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
57,221 |
|
|
$ |
76,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
3,848 |
|
|
$ |
4,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for interest |
|
$ |
12,976 |
|
|
$ |
23,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
17,393 |
|
|
$ |
38,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits paid in Class A common stock |
|
$ |
19,374 |
|
|
$ |
17,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets contributed in connection with the Spin-off, excluding cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,635,680 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
DISH Network Corporation, formerly known as EchoStar Communications Corporation, is a holding
company. Its subsidiaries (which together with DISH Network Corporation are referred to as DISH
Network, the Company, we, us and/or our) operate the DISH Network® which provides a direct
broadcast satellite (DBS) subscription television service in the United States and had 13.815
million subscribers as of March 31, 2008.
We have deployed substantial resources to develop the DISH Network DBS System. The DISH Network
DBS System consists of our owned and leased Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authorized
DBS and Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver
systems, digital broadcast operations, customer service facilities, in-home service
and call center operations and certain other assets utilized in our operations. Our principal
business strategy is to continue developing our subscription television service in the United
States to provide consumers with a fully competitive alternative to others in the multi-channel
video programming distribution (MVPD) industry.
Spin-off of EchoStar Corporation and Technology and Certain Infrastructure Assets
On January 1, 2008, we completed a, tax-free distribution of our technology and set-top
box business, and certain infrastructure assets (the Spin-off) into a separate publicly-traded
company, EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar). DISH Network and EchoStar now operate independently,
and neither entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, both companies are under the
common control of Charles W. Ergen, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of
Directors. The two entities consist of the following:
|
|
|
DISH Network Corporation which retains its subscription television business, the
DISH Network®, and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation which sells equipment, including set-top boxes and related
components, to DISH Network and international customers, and provides digital broadcast
operations and fixed satellite services to DISH Network and other customers. |
The cash flows related to, among others things, purchases of set-top boxes, transponder leasing and
digital broadcasting services that we continue to purchase from EchoStar have not been
eliminated from our ongoing operations.
Our shareholders of record on
December 27, 2007 received one share of EchoStar common
stock for every five shares of each class of Dish Network common stock they held as of the
record date.
4
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The table below summarizes the assets and liabilities that were distributed to EchoStar in connection
with the Spin-off. The distribution was accounted for at historical cost given the nature
of the distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
690,866 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
841,401 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
38,054 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
31,000 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,459 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
32,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,642,131 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
3,150 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,516,604 |
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
165,994 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
214,544 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
256,917 |
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
93,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,893,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,825 |
|
Deferred revenue and other accrued expenses |
|
|
38,460 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
40,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
84,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
obligations, net of current portion: |
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
341,886 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
139,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
481,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
566,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets distributed |
|
$ |
3,326,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information.
Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete
financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2007 10-K/A).
5
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries and investments in entities in which we have
controlling influence. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method
when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When
we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the
cost method is used. For entities that are considered variable interest entities we apply the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46R). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things,
allowances for uncollectible accounts, inventory allowances, self-insurance obligations, deferred
taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair values of
financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair
value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, capital leases, asset
impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer commissions,
programming expenses, subscriber lives and royalty obligations. Actual results may differ from
previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of
revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(48,891 |
) |
|
|
5,611 |
|
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(4,523 |
) |
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit attributable to unrealized holding gains
(losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
21,223 |
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
224,728 |
|
|
$ |
158,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) presented on the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets and below consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
46,698 |
|
Distribution
of accumulated other comprehensive income to EchoStar, net of tax (Note 1) |
|
|
(39,251 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(53,414 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit attributable to unrealized holding gains
(losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
21,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(26,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128) requires
entities to present both basic earnings per share (EPS) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes
dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
stock options were exercised and convertible securities were converted to common stock.
The potential dilution from our subordinated notes convertible into common stock was computed using
the if converted method. The potential dilution from stock options exercisable into common stock
was computed using the treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A
common stock. The following table reflects the basic and diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share amounts for
all periods are presented below in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 128.
7
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per share Net income (loss). |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
Interest on subordinated notes convertible into common shares, net of related tax effect |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
261,044 |
|
|
$ |
159,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per common share
weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
448,803 |
|
|
|
446,278 |
|
Dilutive impact of options outstanding |
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
Dilutive impact of subordinated notes convertible into common shares |
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share
weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
460,218 |
|
|
|
455,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 (Note 8) |
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
6,866 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 (Note 8) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
As of March 31, 2008 and 2007, there were options to purchase 3.4 million and 2.8 million shares of
Class A common stock outstanding, respectively, not included in the above denominator as their
effect is antidilutive.
Vesting of options and rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock granted pursuant to our
long-term incentive plans is contingent upon meeting certain long-term goals which have not yet
been achieved. As a consequence, the following are not included in the diluted EPS calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Performance-based options |
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
10,471 |
|
Restricted performance units |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,311 |
|
|
|
11,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), for all financial instruments and non-financial
instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a new
framework for measuring fair value and expands related disclosures. Broadly, the SFAS 157
framework requires fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. SFAS 157 establishes market or observable inputs as the preferred source of values,
followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the
absence of market inputs.
8
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2, defined as observable inputs including quoted prices for similar assets; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available. |
Investments in debt and equity securities
We have invested in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage backed securities (MBS), which
are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value. Due to recent events in
credit markets, however, the auctions for the ARS investments have failed. Additionally, the recent
events in the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our MBS
investments. The fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a combination of
comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These analyses consider, among other items, the
collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings, and liquidity. These securities were also
compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our ARS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities rather than the credit risk associated with the
underlying collateral, we have recorded an unrealized loss of $15 million, net of tax, to
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of
March 31, 2008, we reclassified $143 million of these investments to non-current assets to reflect
a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from the current and possible
continued illiquidity. The ARS investments held by us at March 31, 2008 are primarily
collateralized by high credit quality assets.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our MBS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities, we have recorded an
unrealized loss of $11 million,
net of tax, to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. As of March 31, 2008, we reclassified $12 million of these investments to
non-current assets to reflect a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from
the current and possible continued illiquidity.
Any future change in fair value related to our ARS and MBS investments that we deem to be temporary
would be recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If we determine that any
declines below our reported cost basis are other than temporary, we would record a charge to
earnings, as appropriate.
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
$ |
790,939 |
|
|
$ |
538,930 |
|
|
$ |
92,019 |
|
|
$ |
159,990 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
797,711 |
|
|
$ |
538,930 |
|
|
$ |
92,019 |
|
|
$ |
166,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Changes in Level 3 instruments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
included in Other |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
included in |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
and |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Assets |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Marketable investment
securities |
|
$ |
200,595 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(39,530 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,075 |
) |
|
$ |
159,990 |
|
Other investment securities. |
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
|
(4,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
211,999 |
|
|
$ |
(4,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,530 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,075 |
) |
|
$ |
166,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In addition to filing federal income tax returns, we and our subsidiaries, file income tax returns
in all states that impose an income tax and in a small number of foreign jurisdictions where we
have insignificant operations. We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for the years beginning in 1996 due to the carryover of previously
incurred net operating losses. As of March 31, 2008, no taxing authority has proposed any
significant adjustments to our tax positions. We have no significant current tax examinations in
process.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
20,160 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
46,178 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
105,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
172,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest on tax positions is recorded as a component of interest expense and penalties in
Other income (expense) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recorded $5 million in
interest and penalty expense to earnings. Accrued interest and penalties was $8 million at March
31, 2008.
We have
$167 million in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, could affect the effective
tax rate. It is reasonably possible that $103 million of our unrecognized tax benefits will be
reduced within the next twelve months as a result of filing a change in tax accounting method, and
we expect that the reduction will not affect our effective tax rate.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Revised Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (revised
2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141 and establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, including goodwill, the liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
10
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of retained
noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes
reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish
between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. This standard
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the
impact the adoption of SFAS 160 will have on our financial position and results of operations.
3. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
In connection with the Spin-off, as provided in our existing stock incentive plans and consistent
with the Spin-off exchange ratio, each DISH Network stock option was converted into two options as
follows:
|
|
|
an adjusted DISH Network stock option for the same number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.831219. |
|
|
|
|
a new EchoStar stock option for one-fifth of the number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.843907. |
Similarly, each holder of DISH Network restricted stock units retained his or her DISH Network
restricted stock units and received one EchoStar restricted stock unit for every five DISH Network
restricted stock units that they held.
Consequently, the fair value of the DISH Network stock award and the new EchoStar stock award immediately following the
Spin-off was equivalent to the fair value of such stock award immediately prior to the
Spin-off.
We maintain stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees.
Awards under these plans include both performance and non-performance based equity incentives. As
of March 31, 2008, we had outstanding under these plans options to acquire 21.3 million shares of
our Class A common stock and 1.7 million restricted stock awards. In general, stock options
granted through March 31, 2008 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the
market value of our Class A common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum term of ten years.
While historically we have issued options subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20% per
year, some options have been granted with immediate vesting. As of March 31, 2008, we had 64.1
million shares of our Class A common stock available for future grant under our stock incentive
plans.
11
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
As of March 31, 2008, the following DISH Network stock incentive awards were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
DISH Network |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Stock Awards Outstanding |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
Held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
15,565,051 |
|
|
|
512,079 |
|
Held by EchoStar employees |
|
|
5,776,239 |
|
|
|
1,178,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21,341,290 |
|
|
|
1,690,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, as of March 31, 2008 the following outstanding EchoStar stock incentive awards were
held by our employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar |
|
|
|
EchoStar Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Stock Awards Outstanding |
|
Options |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
Held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
3,475,665 |
|
|
|
101,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are responsible for fulfilling all stock incentive awards related to DISH Network common stock and EchoStar
is responsible for fulfilling all stock incentive awards related to EchoStar common stock, regardless of
whether such stock incentive awards are held by our or EchoStars employees. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R, our stock-based compensation expense, resulting
from awards outstanding at the Spin-off date, is based on the stock incentive awards held by our
employees regardless of whether such awards were issued by DISH Network or EchoStar. Accordingly,
stock-based compensation that we expense with respect to EchoStar stock incentive awards is included
in Additional paid-in capital on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Stock Award Activity
Our stock option activity (including performance and non-performance based options) for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Total options outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
20,938,403 |
|
|
$ |
22.61 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,059,000 |
|
|
|
28.73 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(43,692 |
) |
|
|
9.17 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(612,421 |
) |
|
|
29.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options outstanding, end of period |
|
|
21,341,290 |
|
|
|
22.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance based options outstanding, end of
period * |
|
|
9,720,750 |
|
|
|
16.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
6,451,117 |
|
|
|
28.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These options, which are included in the caption Total options outstanding, end of period,
were issued pursuant to two separate long-term, performance-based stock incentive plans, which are
discussed below. Vesting of these options is contingent upon meeting certain long-term goals which
management has determined are not probable as of March 31, 2008. |
12
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
We realized less than $1 million and $1 million of tax benefits from stock options exercised during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on the closing market price of
our Class A common stock on March 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of our outstanding stock
options was $165 million. Of that amount, options with an aggregate intrinsic value of $26 million
were exercisable at the end of the period.
Our restricted stock award activity (including performance and non-performance based options) for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Total restricted stock awards outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
1,717,078 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(26,667 |
) |
|
|
35.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted stock awards outstanding, end of period |
|
|
1,690,411 |
|
|
|
29.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted performance units outstanding, end of period * |
|
|
590,411 |
|
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These restricted performance units, which are included in the caption Total restricted stock
awards outstanding, end of period, were issued pursuant to a long-term, performance-based stock
incentive plan, which is discussed below. Vesting of these restricted performance units is
contingent upon meeting a long-term goal which management has determined is not probable as of
March 31, 2008. |
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
In February 1999, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the 1999 LTIP)
within the terms of our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1999 LTIP provided stock options to key
employees which vest over five years at the rate of 20% per year. Exercise of the options is also
contingent on the Company achieving a company specific goal in relation to an industry-related metric prior to December 31, 2008.
In January 2005, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the 2005 LTIP)
within the terms of our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and
restricted performance units, either alone or in combination, which vest over seven years at the
rate of 10% per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20% per year thereafter.
Exercise of the options is also subject to a performance condition that a Company-specific
subscriber goal is achieved prior to March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 1999 LTIP and the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded in our
financial statements unless and until management concludes achievement of the performance condition
is probable. Given the competitive nature of our business, small variations in subscriber churn,
gross subscriber addition rates and certain other factors can significantly impact subscriber
growth. Consequently, while we did not believe that achievement of either of the goals was
probable as of March 31, 2008, that assessment could change with respect to either goal at any
time. In accordance with SFAS 123R, if all of the awards under each plan were vested and each goal
had been met during the three months ended March 31, 2008, we would have recorded total non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense for our employees as follows:
13
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
Total Contingent Compensation |
|
1999 LTIP |
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
DISH Network awards held by DISH Network
employees |
|
$ |
22,910 |
|
|
$ |
51,764 |
|
EchoStar awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
4,652 |
|
|
|
10,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,562 |
|
|
$ |
62,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the goals are met and there are unvested options at that time, the vested amounts would be
expensed immediately in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, with the unvested
portion recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period. During the three months ended March
31, 2008, if we had determined each goal was probable, we would have recorded total non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense for our employees as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
Contingent Compensation - |
|
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
Vested Portion at March 31, 2008 |
|
1999 LTIP |
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
DISH Network awards held by DISH Network
employees |
|
$ |
20,155 |
|
|
$ |
10,738 |
|
EchoStar awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,248 |
|
|
$ |
12,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 21.3 million options outstanding under our stock incentive plans as of March 31, 2008, the
following options were outstanding pursuant to the 1999 LTIP and the 2005 LTIP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans |
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
1999 LTIP |
|
|
5,194,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.83 |
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
4,526,750 |
|
|
$ |
25.22 |
|
Further, pursuant to the 2005 LTIP, there were also 590,411 outstanding restricted performance
units as of March 31, 2008 with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $25.94. No awards
were granted under the 1999 LTIP or 2005 LTIP during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Stock-Based Compensation
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, net of related tax effects, for all of our
employees is shown in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and
was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for such employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Subscriber-related |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
Satellite and transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
|
$ |
3,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, our total unrecognized compensation cost related to our non-performance based
unvested stock options was $32 million and includes compensation expense that we will recognize for
EchoStar stock options
14
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
held by our employees as a result of the Spin-off. This cost is based on an
estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 6.5% per year and will be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately three years. Share-based compensation expense is
recognized based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures.
SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated
forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect
of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
The fair value of each award for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was estimated at
the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
4.46% - 4.65% |
Volatility factor |
|
|
19.98 |
% |
|
20.42% |
Expected term of options in years |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
6.0 - 10.0 |
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted |
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
|
$11.39 - $15.85 |
We do not currently plan to pay additional dividends on our common stock, and therefore the
dividend yield percentage is set at zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option valuation model
was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value may differ from
other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective
assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate. Therefore, we do not believe that the existing models provide as reliable a single
measure of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as a market-based model would.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of options for
our stock as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Finished goods DBS |
|
$ |
166,773 |
|
|
$ |
170,463 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
88,066 |
|
|
|
70,103 |
|
Work-in-process used |
|
|
80,700 |
|
|
|
67,542 |
|
Work-in-process new |
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
13,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
337,914 |
|
|
|
321,654 |
|
Inventory allowance |
|
|
(18,292 |
) |
|
|
(14,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
319,622 |
|
|
$ |
306,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Investment Securities
Marketable Investment Securities
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the
carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the related temporary
unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit), net of
15
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
related deferred income tax.
Declines in the fair value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be other
than temporary are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, thus
establishing a new cost basis for such investment. We evaluate our marketable investment
securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair value of these
securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the
historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors
related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair
value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period of less than six months are
considered to be temporary. Declines in the fair value of investments for a continuous period of
six to nine months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or
market-specific factors exist which would indicate that such declines are other than temporary.
Declines in the fair value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period greater than
nine months are considered other than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent
specific factors to the contrary.
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair values of our marketable investment securities
and strategic marketable investment securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
$ |
518,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,565 |
|
Marketable investment securities strategic |
|
|
60,744 |
|
|
|
576,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable investment securities |
|
|
578,968 |
|
|
|
1,607,378 |
|
Long-term marketable investment securities |
|
|
155,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable investment securities |
|
$ |
734,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,607,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in our marketable investment securities from December 31, 2007 was primarily due to the
distribution of marketable investment securities to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see
Note 1).
Our strategic marketable investment securities are highly speculative and have experienced and
continue to experience volatility. If the fair value of our strategic marketable investment
securities portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware of any market or
company specific factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our securities is
impaired, we may be required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to the amount of
the decline in fair value.
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had accumulated unrealized gains (losses) net of
related tax effect of $42 million in losses and a $30 million gain, respectively, as a part of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit).
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we did not record any charge to earnings for
other than temporary declines in the fair value of our marketable investment securities. In
addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we recognized realized and
unrealized net gains on marketable investment securities of $2 million and $3 million,
respectively.
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position. The following table reflects the length of
time that the individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by
investment category. The unrealized losses on our investment in corporate securities represent
investments in the common stock of a company in the communications industry. At March 31, 2008, the
losses on our investments in bonds primarily represent investments in auction rate, mortgage and asset-backed securities. We are not aware of any specific
factors which indicate the unrealized loss in these investments is due to anything other than
temporary market fluctuations or liquidity concerns. In addition, we have the ability and intent to hold our investments
in these bonds until maturity when the issuers are required to redeem them at their full face
value.
16
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Primary |
|
Maturity |
|
Less than Six Months |
|
Six to Nine Months |
|
Nine Months or More |
Investment |
|
Reason for |
|
in |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
Category |
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Years |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Corporate bonds
|
|
Temporary market
fluctuations
|
|
1-15
|
|
$ |
628,540 |
|
|
$ |
(49,112 |
) |
|
$ |
69,838 |
|
|
$ |
(5,457 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporate equity securities
|
|
Temporary market
fluctuations
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
60,744 |
|
|
|
(13,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
689,284 |
|
|
$ |
(62,242 |
) |
|
$ |
69,838 |
|
|
$ |
(5,457 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Government and corporate bonds
|
|
Temporary market
fluctuations
|
|
1-2
|
|
$ |
361,347 |
|
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
163,230 |
|
|
$ |
(1,909 |
) |
|
$
|
|
$ |
Corporate equity securities
|
|
Temporary market
fluctuations
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
186,352 |
|
|
|
(16,192 |
) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
547,699 |
|
|
$ |
(23,360 |
) |
|
$ |
165,354 |
|
|
$ |
(2,936 |
) |
|
$
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Securities
We also have several strategic investments in certain equity securities which are included in
Other noncurrent assets, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our other investment
securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost method |
|
$ |
68,391 |
|
|
$ |
108,355 |
|
Equity method |
|
|
47,717 |
|
|
|
68,127 |
|
Fair value method |
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
187,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, we account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either the equity method or
cost method of accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not publicly traded, it
is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments; however, these
investments are subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and
current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our
investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material
litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these
equity investments is not estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances that may
indicate an impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the investment.
We also have a strategic investment in non-public preferred stock, public common stock and
convertible debt of a foreign public company. The debt, which is convertible into the issuers
publicly traded common shares, is accounted for under the fair value method with changes in fair
value reported each period as unrealized gains or losses in Other income or expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We estimate the fair value of the convertible
debt using certain assumptions and judgments in applying a discounted cash flow analysis and the
Black-Scholes option pricing model including the fair market value of the underlying common stock
price as
of that date. During 2006, we converted a portion of the convertible debt to public common shares
and determined that we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the
issuer. Consequently, we account for the common share component of this investment under the
equity method of accounting. As a result of our change to equity method accounting, we evaluate
the common share component of this investment on a quarterly basis to determine whether there has
been a decline in the value that is other than temporary. Because the shares are
17
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
publicly traded,
this quarterly evaluation considers the fair market value of the common shares in addition to the
other factors described above for equity and cost method investments. When impairments occur
related to our foreign investments, any Cumulative translation adjustment associated with these
investments will remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total
stockholders equity (deficit) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until the investments
are sold or otherwise liquidated; at which time, they will be released into our Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The changes in the fair value and impairments of our other investment securities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
$ |
(4,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,167 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, restricted cash and marketable investment securities
included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit. Additionally, restricted cash
and marketable investment securities as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 included $104
million and $101 million in escrow related to our litigation with Tivo, respectively.
6. Satellites
We presently utilize twelve satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the
equator. Of these twelve satellites, five are owned by us and we lease six from EchoStar as a
result of the Spin-off. We account for the satellites leased from EchoStar as operating leases
with terms of up to two years. (See Note 13 for further discussion of our satellite leases with
EchoStar.) Each of the owned satellites had an original minimum useful life of at least 12 years.
We also lease one satellite from a third party, which is accounted for as a capital lease pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases (SFAS 13). The
capital lease is depreciated over the fifteen year term of the satellite service agreement.
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain competitive and thus have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While we believe that overall our satellite fleet is generally in good condition, during 2008 and prior periods, certain satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant adverse impact on their commercial operation. Recent developments with respect to our satellites are discussed below.
EchoStar V. EchoStar V was originally designed with a minimum 12-year design life. Momentum wheel
failures
18
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
in prior years, together with relocation of the satellite between orbital locations,
resulted in increased fuel consumption, as previously disclosed. These issues have not impacted
commercial operation of the satellite. However, as a result of these anomalies and the relocation
of the satellite, during 2005, we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of this satellite.
Prior to 2008, EchoStar V also experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of ten solar array
strings. During first quarter 2008, the satellite lost two additional solar array strings. The
solar array anomalies have not impacted commercial operation of the satellite to date. Since
EchoStar V will be fully depreciated in October 2008, the solar array failures (which will result
in a reduction in the number of transponders to which power can be provided in later years), have
not reduced the remaining useful life of the satellite. However, there can be no assurance that
future anomalies will not cause further losses which could impact commercial operation, or the
remaining life, of the satellite. See discussion of evaluation of impairment in Long-Lived
Satellite Assets below.
AMC-14. In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed our AMC-14 satellite lease agreement with
SES Americom (SES) to EchoStar with the intent to lease the entire capacity of the satellite from
EchoStar. On March 14, 2008, a Proton launch vehicle carrying the SES AMC-14 satellite experienced
an anomaly which left the satellite in a lower orbit than planned. On April 11, 2008, SES
announced that it has declared to insurers that the AMC-14 satellite is now considered a total
loss, due to a lack of viable options to reposition the satellite to its proper geostationary
orbit. We do not expect to incur any financial liability as a result of the AMC-14 satellite being
declared a total loss.
Long-Lived Satellite Assets
We account for impairments of long-lived satellite assets in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires a long-lived asset or asset group to be tested
for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that its carrying amount may
not be recoverable. Based on the guidance under SFAS 144, we evaluate our owned and capital leased
satellites for recoverability as one asset group. While certain of the anomalies discussed above,
and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the
physical condition of an individual satellite, based on the redundancy designed within each
satellite and considering the asset grouping, these anomalies (none of which caused a loss of
service to subscribers for an extended period) are not considered to be significant events that
would require evaluation for impairment recognition pursuant to the guidance under SFAS 144.
Unless and until a specific satellite is abandoned or otherwise determined to have no service
potential, the net carrying amount related to the satellite would not be written off.
19
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
7. Intangible Assets
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our identifiable intangibles subject to amortization
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contract-based |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
192,845 |
|
|
$ |
(60,754 |
) |
Customer and reseller relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,898 |
|
|
|
(70,433 |
) |
Technology-based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,797 |
|
|
|
(9,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
359,540 |
|
|
$ |
(140,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2008, intangible assets with a net book value of $215 million were distributed to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see Note 1). The intangible assets remaining, which were
fully amortized and are no longer in service, were written-off as of March 31, 2008. Amortization
of these intangible assets was $4 million and $9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries participated in the auction of 700 MHz wireless spectrum
designated by the FCC as Auction 73 (the Auction). On March 20, 2008, the FCC disclosed that the
subsidiary was the provisional winning bidder of 168 E Block licenses in the Auction totaling $712
million and representing coverage of 76% of the U.S. population. As part of the Auction, we made a
deposit of $115 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, which is included in Other
current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the remaining balance of $597
million was paid in April 2008. While the bidding in the Auction has ended, the FCC has not yet
awarded any of the licenses to winning bidders nor is there any prescribed timeframe for the FCC to
review the qualifications of the various winning bidders and award licenses.
8. Long-Term Debt
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010
Our 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010, which was sold to AT&T in a privately negotiated
transaction, has an aggregate principal amount of $500 million and is convertible into 8,298,775
shares of our Class A common stock at the option of AT&T (an effective conversion price of $60.25
per share). The number of shares was adjusted from 6,866,245 shares of our Class A common stock
during the first quarter 2008 in connection with the Spin-off and as required by the terms of the
Note. Commencing July 21, 2008, we may redeem, and AT&T may require us to repurchase, all or a
portion of the note at its principal amount, without premium.
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011
Our 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011, which was sold to CenturyTel Service Group, LLC
(CTL) in a privately negotiated transaction, is convertible into 481,881 shares of our Class A
common stock at the option of CTL (an effective conversion price of $51.88 per share). The number
of shares was adjusted from 398,724 shares of our Class A common stock during the first quarter
2008 in connection with the Spin-off and as required by the terms of the Note.
20
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Capital Lease Obligations
Future minimum lease payments under our capital lease obligations remaining after the Spin-off,
together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2008, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 (remaining nine months) |
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
676,000 |
|
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily
insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments |
|
|
(366,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments |
|
|
309,778 |
|
Less: Amount representing interest |
|
|
(118,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
191,401 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(7,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
183,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Future maturities of our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,525,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,025,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
Satellite-related obligations* |
|
|
1,753,695 |
|
|
|
949,951 |
|
|
|
124,344 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
471,224 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
191,401 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
10,556 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
136,198 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
93,542 |
|
|
|
30,943 |
|
|
|
34,127 |
|
|
|
14,320 |
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,267,231 |
|
|
|
942,151 |
|
|
|
251,123 |
|
|
|
40,247 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
24,907 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,855,776 |
|
|
$ |
3,430,989 |
|
|
$ |
420,233 |
|
|
$ |
117,766 |
|
|
$ |
1,108,264 |
|
|
$ |
79,067 |
|
|
$ |
578,437 |
|
|
$ |
3,121,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Includes the $597 million balance payment made in April 2008 for the 700 MHz wireless spectrum (See Note 7).
In certain circumstances the dates on which we are obligated to make these payments could be
delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or
contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.
Guarantees
In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed satellite lease agreements to EchoStar. We remain
the guarantor under those capital leases for payments totaling approximately $578 million over the
next eight years. In addition, during the first quarter of 2008,
EchoStar entered into a satellite
transponder service agreement with a third party for $543 million in payments
through 2024, which we subleased from EchoStar and have also guaranteed. As of March 31, 2008 we
have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for any of these guarantees.
21
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Separation Agreement
In connection with the Spin-off, we have entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar, which
provides for, among other things, the division of liability resulting from litigation. Under the
terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed liability for any acts or omissions that
relate to its business whether such acts or omissions occurred before or after the Spin-off.
Certain exceptions are provided, including for intellectual property related claims generally,
whereby EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions that occurred following the
Spin-off. Therefore, we have indemnified EchoStar for any potential liability or damages resulting
from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the effective date of the
Spin-off.
Contingencies
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast,
Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license the patent portfolio that it has acquired. The
suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent), 5,253,275 (the
275 patent), 5,550,863 (the 863 patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the 702
patent). The 992, 863, 720 and 702 patents have been asserted against us.
The patents relate to various systems and methods related to the transmission of digital data. The
992 and 702 patents have also been asserted against several Internet content providers in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California. During 2004 and 2005, the
Court issued Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702 patents were not as broad as Acacia
had contended, and that certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. The Court issued
additional claim construction rulings on December 14, 2006, March 2, 2007, October 19, 2007, and
February 13, 2008. On March 12, 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for filing
dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to stipulate
that all claims in the suit are invalid according to various of the Courts claim constructions and
argues that the case should proceed immediately to the Federal Circuit. The Court has set a
hearing for May 6, 2008, at which time it will determine whether the parties will proceed with
additional invalidity motions or enter final judgment based on Acacias agreement that all asserted
claims are invalid.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the
patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit
alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and
receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The 066 patent relates to
certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on
removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our
products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving
us as the only defendant.
22
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
ruled the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case back to the District Court. During June 2006,
Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The
Court has stayed the case pending reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. We filed a motion to dismiss, which the court granted with
leave for plaintiffs to amend their complaint. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We
cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Datasec
During April 2008, Datasec Corporation (Datasec) sued us and DirecTV Corporation in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 6,075,969 (the 969 patent). The 969 patent was issued in 2000 to inventor Bruce
Lusignan, and is entitled Method for Receiving Signals from a Constellation of Satellites in
Close Geosynchronous Orbit.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system
architecture. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or
determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Distant Network Litigation
During October 2006, a District Court in Florida entered a permanent nationwide injunction
prohibiting us from offering distant network channels to consumers effective December 1, 2006.
Distant networks are ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox network channels which originate outside the community
where the consumer who wants to view them, lives. We have turned off all of our distant network
channels and are no longer in the distant network business. Termination of these channels resulted
in, among other things, a small reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and free cash
flow, and a temporary increase in subscriber churn. The plaintiffs in that litigation allege that
we are in violation of the Courts injunction and have appealed a District Court decision finding
that we are not in violation. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with
any degree of certainty the outcome of the appeal or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was
23
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against
approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial paper. The
complaint alleges that Enrons October 2001 purchase of its commercial paper was a fraudulent
conveyance and voidable preference under bankruptcy laws. We dispute these allegations. We
typically invest in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest rating
categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the time of
our investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and low risk. We
intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome
of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
In July 2006, we, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to
declare that they and we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505
patent. Trial is not currently scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action until the
Federal Circuit has resolved DirecTVs appeal. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the
judgment against DirecTV and ordered a new trial. We are evaluating the Federal Circuits decision
to determine the impact on our action.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Global Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent). This patent, which involves
satellite reception, was issued in September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. Based on the PTOs
decision, we have asked the District Court to stay the litigation until the reexamination
proceeding is concluded. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe the 702 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages,
which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify
certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any
degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or
damages.
Katz Communications
On June 21, 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
24
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490 (the 490 patent), 5,109,414 (the 414
patent), 4,965,825 (the 825 patent), 5,233,654 (the 654 patent), 5,335,277 (the 277 patent),
and 5,887,243 (the 243 patent), all of which were issued to John Harvey and James Cuddihy as
named inventors. The 490 patent, the 414 patent, the 825 patent, the 654 patent and the 277
patent are defined as the Harvey Patents. The Harvey Patents are entitled Signal Processing
Apparatus and Methods. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that our DBS system receives
program content at broadcast reception and satellite uplinking facilities and transmits such
program content, via satellite, to remote satellite receivers. The lawsuit further alleges that
we infringe the Harvey Patents by transmitting and using a DBS signal specifically encoded to
enable the subject receivers to function in a manner that infringes the Harvey Patents, and by
selling services via DBS transmission processes which infringe the Harvey Patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal court attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We are vigorously defending against the suits and have asserted a
variety of counterclaims. The federal court action has been stayed during the pendency of the
state court action. We filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts and against all
plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for additional time to conduct discovery to enable them
to respond to our motion. The Court granted limited discovery which ended during 2004. The
plaintiffs claimed we did not provide adequate disclosure during the discovery process. The Court
agreed, and denied our motion for summary judgment as a result. The final impact of the Courts
ruling cannot be fully assessed at this time. During April 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs
class certification motion. Trial has been set for August 2008. We intend to vigorously defend
this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the
extent of any potential liability or damages.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp. (Superguide) filed suit against us, DirecTV, Thomson and others in
the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division,
alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (the 211 patent), 5,293,357 (the 357
patent) and 4,751,578 (the 578 patent) which relate to certain electronic program guide functions,
including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and
declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount.
On summary judgment, the District Court ruled that none of the asserted patents were infringed by
us. These rulings were appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
During 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Courts
findings and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. In 2005,
Superguide indicated that it would no longer pursue infringement allegations with respect to the
211 and 357 patents and those patents have now been dismissed from the suit. The District Court
subsequently entered judgment of non-infringement in favor of all defendants as to the 211 and
357 patents and ordered briefing on Thomsons license defense as to the 578 patent. During
December 2006, the District Court found that there were disputed issues of fact regarding Thomsons
license defense, and ordered a trial solely
25
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
addressed to that issue. That trial took place in March 2007. In July 2007, the District
Court ruled in favor of Superguide. As a result, Superguide will be able to proceed with its
infringement action against us, DirecTV and Thomson.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the 578 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
electronic programming guide and related features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Tivo Inc.
On January 31, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed
the jurys verdict of infringement on Tivos software claims, upheld the award of damages from
the district court, and ordered that the stay of the district courts injunction against us, which
was issued pending appeal, will dissolve when the appeal becomes final. The Federal Circuit,
however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims, and remanded such
claims back to the district court for further proceedings. We are appealing the Federal Circuits
ruling to the United States Supreme Court.
In addition, we have developed and deployed next-generation DVR software to our customers DVRs.
This improved software is fully operational and has been automatically downloaded to current
customers (the Design-Around). We have formal legal opinions from outside counsel that conclude
that our Design-Around does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either
the hardware or software claims of Tivos patent.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (SFAS 5), we recorded a total reserve of $129 million on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the jury verdict, supplemental damages and pre-judgment
interest awarded by the Texas court. This amount also includes the estimated cost of any software
infringement prior to the Design-Around, plus interest subsequent to the jury verdict.
If the Federal Circuits decision is upheld and Tivo decides to challenge the Design-Around, we
will mount a vigorous defense. If we are unsuccessful in subsequent appeals or in defending
against claims that the Design-Around infringes Tivos patent, we could be prohibited from
distributing DVRs, or be required to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that we
currently offer to consumers. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our
competitors who could offer this functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that
functionality through other manufacturers, the adverse affect on our business could be material.
We could also have to pay substantial additional damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability
with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
26
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
10. Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equipment leased to customers |
|
$ |
212,279 |
|
|
$ |
206,679 |
|
Satellites* |
|
|
26,451 |
|
|
|
59,044 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other* |
|
|
28,237 |
|
|
|
42,838 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization* |
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
9,137 |
|
Buildings and improvements* |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
272,368 |
|
|
$ |
320,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The period-over-period decreases in depreciation and amortization expense are primarily a result
of the distribution of depreciable assets to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see Note 1).
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment
leased to customers.
11. Segment Reporting
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information (SFAS 131) establishes standards for reporting information about
operating segments in annual financial statements of public business enterprises and requires that
those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports
issued to stockholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s)
of an enterprise. Total assets by segment have not been specified because the information is not
available to the chief operating decision-maker. The All Other category consists of revenue and
net income (loss) from other operating segments for which the disclosure requirements of SFAS 131
do not apply. Based on the standards set forth in SFAS 131, following the January 1, 2008 Spin-off
discussed in Note 1, we operate in only one reportable segment, the DISH Network segment, which
provides a DBS subscription television service in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network |
|
$ |
2,844,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,583,788 |
|
ETC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,574 |
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,640 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,844,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,644,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,404 |
|
ETC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,665 |
) |
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-lived assets, including FCC authorizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,214,543 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,214,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,182,587 |
|
|
$ |
196,958 |
|
|
$ |
5,379,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,844,394 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,844,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,625,924 |
|
|
$ |
19,061 |
|
|
$ |
2,644,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to geographic regions based upon the location where the sale originated.
United States revenue includes transactions with both United Sates and international customers.
Following the January 1, 2008 Spin-off discussed in Note 1, we operate in only one geographic
region.
12. Related Party Transactions with EchoStar
Following the Spin-off, EchoStar has operated independently from us and we have no continued
ownership interest in EchoStar, however, we are both under the common control of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, Charles W. Ergen.
EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes, transponder leasing and digital broadcast
operations. Generally all agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off are based on
pricing at cost plus an additional amount equal to an agreed percentage of EchoStars cost (unless
noted differently below), which will vary depending on the nature of the products and services
provided. Prior to the Spin-off, these products were provided and services were performed
internally at cost. The terms of our agreements with EchoStar provide for an arbitration mechanism
in the event we are unable to reach agreement with EchoStar as to the additional amounts payable
for products and services, under which the arbitrator will determine the additional amounts payable
by reference to the fair market value of the products and services supplied.
We and EchoStar also entered into certain transitional services agreements pursuant to which we
will obtain certain services and rights from EchoStar. EchoStar will obtain certain services and
rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising
from our respective businesses. The following is a summary of the
terms of the principle agreements
that we have entered into with EchoStar that have an impact on our results of operations.
Equipment sales EchoStar
|
|
|
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. We entered into a remanufactured receiver
agreement with EchoStar under which EchoStar has the right to purchase remanufactured
receivers, services and accessories from us for a two-year period. EchoStar may
terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days written
notice to us. We may also terminate this agreement if certain entities acquire us. |
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar
|
|
|
Transition Services Agreement. We entered into a transition services agreement with
EchoStar pursuant to which we, or one of our subsidiaries, provide certain transitional
services to EchoStar. Under the transition services agreement, EchoStar has the right,
but not the obligation, to receive the following services from us: finance, information
technology, benefits administration, travel and event coordination, human resources,
human resources development (training), program management, internal audit and
corporate quality, legal, accounting and tax, and other support services. |
28
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The transition services agreement has a term of no longer than two years. We may
terminate the transition services agreement with respect to a particular service for any
reason upon thirty days prior written notice.
|
|
|
Real Estate Lease Agreements. We entered into lease agreements with EchoStar so
that we can continue to operate certain properties that were distributed to EchoStar in
the Spin-off. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable
to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic
area, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance,
utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth
below: |
Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood,
Colorado, is for a period of two years.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood,
Colorado, is for a period of two years with annual renewal options for up to three
additional years.
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton,
Colorado, is for a period of two years with annual renewal options for up to three
additional years.
|
|
|
Management Services Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a
management services agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we make certain of our
officers available to provide services (which are primarily legal and accounting
services) to EchoStar. Specifically, Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton Dodge and Paul W. Orban
remain employed by us, but also serve as EchoStars Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and Senior Vice
President and Controller, respectively. In addition, Carl E. Vogel is employed as our
Vice Chairman but also provides services to EchoStar as an advisor. EchoStar will make
payments to us based upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses
incurred by us with respect to such officers (taking into account wages and fringe
benefits). These allocations will be based upon the estimated percentages of time to be
spent by our executive officers performing services for EchoStar under the management
services agreement. EchoStar will also reimburse us for direct out-of-pocket costs
incurred by us for management services provided to EchoStar. We and EchoStar evaluate
all charges for reasonableness at least annually and make any adjustments to these
charges as we and EchoStar mutually agree upon. |
|
|
|
|
The management services agreement will continue in effect until the first anniversary of
the Spin-off, and will be renewed automatically for successive one-year periods
thereafter, unless terminated earlier (1) by EchoStar at any time upon at least 30 days
prior written notice, (2) by us at the end of any renewal term, upon at least 180 days
prior notice; and (3) by us upon written notice to EchoStar, following certain changes
in control. |
29
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
|
|
|
Broadcast Agreement. We entered into a broadcast agreement with EchoStar, whereby
EchoStar provides broadcast services including teleport services such as transmission
and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services, thereby
enabling us to deliver satellite television programming to subscribers. The broadcast
agreement has a term of two years; however, we have the right, but not the obligation,
to extend the agreement annually for successive one-year periods for up to two
additional years. We may terminate channel origination services and channel management
services for any reason and without any liability upon sixty days written notice to
EchoStar. If we terminate teleport services for a reason other than EchoStars breach,
we shall pay EchoStar a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the remainder of the
expected cost of providing the teleport services. |
|
|
|
|
Satellite Capacity Agreements. We have entered into satellite capacity agreements
with EchoStar on a transitional basis. Pursuant to these agreements, we lease
satellite capacity on satellites owned by EchoStar and/or slots licensed by EchoStar.
Certain DISH Network subscribers currently point their satellite antenna at these slots
and this agreement is designed to facilitate the separation of us and EchoStar by
allowing a period of time for these DISH Network subscribers to be moved to satellites
owned by us and/or to slots that will be licensed to us following the Spin-off. The
fees for the services to be provided under the satellite capacity agreements are based
on spot market prices for similar satellite capacity and will depend upon, among other
things, the orbital location of the satellite and the frequency on which the satellite
provides services. Generally, each satellite capacity agreement will terminate upon the
earlier of: (a) the end of life or replacement of the satellite; (b) the date the
satellite fails; (c) the date that the transponder on which service is being provided
under the agreement fails; or (d) two years from the effective date of such agreement. |
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar
|
|
|
Receiver Agreement. EchoStar is currently our sole supplier of set-top box
receivers. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we purchased set-top box and
other equipment from EchoStar totaling $372 million. Of this amount, $31 million is
included in Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar on our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The remaining amount is included in
Inventories, net and Property and equipment, net on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. |
|
|
|
|
Under our receiver agreement with EchoStar, we have the right but not the obligation to
purchase receivers and accessories from EchoStar for a two year period. Additionally,
EchoStar will provide us with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the receiver agreement.
We may terminate the receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days written notice to
EchoStar. We may also terminate the receiver agreement if certain entities were to
acquire us. We also have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the receiver
agreement annually for up to two years. The receiver agreement also includes an indemnification provision, whereby the parties will
indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters. |
General and administrative Echostar
|
|
|
Product Support Agreement. We need EchoStar to provide product support (including
engineering and technical support services and IPTV functionality) for all receivers
and related accessories that EchoStar has sold and will sell to us. As a result, we
entered into a product support agreement, under which we have the right, but not the
obligation, to receive product support services in respect of such receivers and
related accessories. The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of
such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier. We may terminate the
product support agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. |
|
|
|
Services Agreement. We entered into a services agreement with EchoStar under
which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive logistics, procurement and
quality assurance services from EchoStar. This agreement has a term of two years.
We may terminate the services agreement with respect to a
particular service for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. |
Tax Sharing Agreement
|
|
|
We entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our and
EchoStars respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with
respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all
pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring
activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, will be borne by us, and we will
indemnify EchoStar for such taxes. However, we will not be liable for and will not
indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or
certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to
any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or
indirect acquisition of any of EchoStars stock, stock options or assets, (ii) any
action that EchoStar takes or fails to take or (iii) any action that EchoStar takes
that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the IRS in
connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection
with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to
the Spin-off or certain related transactions. In such case, EchoStar will be solely
liable for, and will indemnify us for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses,
claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement terminates after the later of the full
period of all applicable statutes of limitations including extensions or once all rights
and obligations are fully effectuated or performed. |
30
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Other EchoStar Transactions
|
|
|
Nimiq 5 Agreement. On March 11, 2008, EchoStar entered into a transponder service
agreement (the Transponder Agreement) with Bell ExpressVu Inc., in its capacity as
General Partner of Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership (Bell ExpressVu), which
provides, among other things, for the provision by Bell ExpressVu to EchoStar of
service on sixteen (16) BSS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7° W.L.
orbital location. The Nimiq 5 satellite is expected to be launched in the second half
of 2009. Bell ExpressVu currently has the right to receive service on the entire
communications capacity of the Nimiq 5 satellite pursuant to an agreement with Telesat
Canada. On March 11, 2008, EchoStar also entered into a transponder service agreement
with DISH Network L.L.C. (DISH L.L.C.), our wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to
which DISH L.L.C. will receive service from EchoStar on all of the BSS transponders
covered by the Transponder Agreement (the DISH Agreement). DISH Network guaranteed
certain obligations of EchoStar under the Transponder Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the Transponder Agreement, EchoStar will make certain up-front
payments to Bell ExpressVu through the service commencement date on the Nimiq 5
satellite and thereafter will make certain monthly payments to Bell ExpressVu for the
remainder of the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions
of the Transponder Agreement, the service term will expire fifteen years following the
actual service commencement date of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon expiration of this
initial term, EchoStar has the option to continue to receive service on the Nimiq 5
satellite on a month-to-month basis. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or
end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, EchoStar has
certain rights to receive service from Bell ExpressVu on a replacement satellite. |
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the DISH Agreement, DISH L.L.C. will make certain monthly payments to
EchoStar commencing when the Nimiq 5 satellite is placed into service (the In-Service
Date) and continuing through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the
terms and conditions of the DISH Agreement, the service term will expire ten years
following the In-Service Date. Upon expiration of the initial term, DISH L.L.C. has the
option to renew the DISH Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of
the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the
Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH L.L.C. has certain rights to
receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite. |
13. Subsequent Events
EchoStar XV
On April 14, 2008, Space Systems/Loral, Inc. began the construction of EchoStar XV, our direct
broadcast satellite expected to launch during 2010. This satellite will enable better bandwidth utilization, provide back-up protection for
our existing offerings, and could allow DISH Network to offer other value-added services.
31
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
We have historically positioned the DISH Network as the leading low-cost provider of multi-channel
pay TV principally by offering lower cost programming packages. At the same time we have sought to
offer high quality programming, equipment and customer service.
We invest significant amounts in subscriber acquisition and retention programs based on our
expectation that long-term subscribers will be profitable. To attract subscribers, we subsidize
the cost of equipment and installation and may also from time to time offer promotional pricing on
programming and other services to increase our subscriber base. We also seek to differentiate DISH
Network through the quality of the equipment we provide to our subscribers, including our highly
rated digital video recorder (DVR) and high definition (HD) equipment which we promote to drive
subscriber growth and retention. Subscriber growth is also impacted, positively and negatively, by
customer service and customer experience in order, installation and troubleshooting interactions.
Since the beginning of 2007, our subscriber base has continued to grow, but at an increasingly
slower pace than in previous periods. We believe that this declining subscriber growth has been
driven in part by competitive factors including the expansion of
fiber-based pay TV providers, the effectiveness of certain competitors promotional offers, the
number of markets in which competitors offer local HD channels, and their aggressive marketing of
these differences. Satellite launch delays have slowed the growth of our local HD markets which in
turn has delayed our own aggressive local HD marketing efforts. Subscriber growth has also been
affected by worsening economic conditions, including the slowdown in new housing starts.
Operational inefficiencies at DISH Network as well as signal piracy and other forms of fraud have
also adversely impacted subscriber growth. Most of the factors described above have affected both
the growth of new subscribers and the churn of existing customers.
Slower subscriber growth rates continued in the first quarter of 2008, during which we added 35,000
net new DISH Network subscribers. This rate of growth was substantially lower than we have
historically experienced on a quarterly basis for the reasons mentioned above.
We believe opportunities exist to continue growing our subscriber base, but whether we will be able
to achieve continuing net subscriber growth is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties,
including those described elsewhere in this quarterly report.
The Spin-off. Effective January 1, 2008, we completed the separation of the assets and businesses
we owned and operated historically into two companies (the Spin-off):
|
|
|
DISH Network, through which we retain our pay-TV business, and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar), formerly known as EchoStar Holding Corporation,
which holds the digital set top box business, certain satellites, uplink and satellite
transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities formerly held by
DISH Network. |
DISH Network and EchoStar now operate as separate public companies, and neither entity has any
ownership interest in the other. However, we are both under the common control of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman, Charles W. Ergen. In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network
entered into certain agreements with EchoStar to define responsibility for obligations relating to,
among other things, set-top box sales, transition services, taxes, employees and intellectual
property which will have an impact in the future on several of our key operating metrics. We have
entered into certain agreements with EchoStar subsequent to the Spin-off and we may enter into
additional agreements with EchoStar in the future.
We believe that the Spin-off will enable us to focus more directly on the business strategies
relevant to the subscription television business, but we recognize that, particularly during 2008,
we may experience disruptions and loss of synergies in our business due to the separation of the
two businesses, which could in turn increase our costs.
32
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS
Subscriber-related revenue. Subscriber-related revenue consists principally of revenue from
basic, movie, local, pay-per-view, and international subscription television services, equipment
rental fees and other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs and additional outlet fees
from subscribers with multiple receivers, advertising services, fees earned from our DishHOME
Protection Plan, equipment upgrade fees, HD programming and other subscriber revenue. Certain of
the amounts included in Subscriber-related revenue are not recurring on a monthly basis.
Effective the third quarter of 2007, we reclassified certain revenue from programmers from Equipment sales and other revenue to Subscriber-related revenue. All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue principally includes the
unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other third-party distributors of our
equipment and to DISH Network subscribers. During 2007, this category also included sales of
non-DISH Network digital receivers and related components to international customers and satellite
and transmission revenue, which related to assets that were distributed to EchoStar in connection
with the Spin-off.
Effective in the third quarter of 2007, we reclassified certain revenue from programmers from
Equipment sales and other revenue to Subscriber-related revenue. All prior period amounts were
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar includes revenue related to equipment sales,
and transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses principally include programming
expenses, costs incurred in connection with our in-home service and call center operations,
copyright royalties, billing costs, residual commissions paid to our distributors, refurbishment
and repair costs related to receiver systems, subscriber retention and other variable subscriber
expenses.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
includes the cost of digital broadcast operations provided to us by EchoStar, which were previously
performed internally, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional
access management, telemetry, tracking and control and other professional services. In addition,
this category includes the cost of leasing satellite and transponder capacity on satellites that
were distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
includes third-party transponder leases and other related services. Prior to the Spin-off,
Satellite and transmission expenses other included costs associated with the operation of our
digital broadcast centers, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing,
conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, satellite and transponder leases,
and other related services, which were previously performed internally.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales principally includes the cost of unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to
retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers. In
addition, this category includes costs related to equipment sales, transitional services and
other agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
During 2007, Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales also included costs
associated with non-DISH Network digital receivers and related components sold to an international
DBS service provider and to other international customers. As previously discussed, our set-top
box business was distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off.
Subscriber acquisition costs. In addition to leasing receivers, we generally subsidize
installation and all or a portion of the cost of our receiver systems in order to attract new DISH
Network subscribers. Our Subscriber acquisition
33
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
costs include the cost of our receiver systems
sold to retailers and other distributors of our equipment, the cost of receiver systems sold
directly by us to subscribers, net costs related to our promotional incentives, and costs related
to installation and acquisition advertising. We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under
our lease program for new subscribers from Subscriber acquisition costs.
SAC. Management believes subscriber acquisition cost measures are commonly used by those
evaluating companies in the multi-channel video programming distribution industry. We are not
aware of any uniform standards for calculating the average subscriber acquisition costs per new
subscriber activation, or SAC, and we believe presentations of SAC may not be calculated
consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. Our SAC is calculated as
Subscriber acquisition costs, plus the value of equipment capitalized under our lease program for
new subscribers, divided by gross subscriber additions. We include all the costs of acquiring
subscribers (e.g., subsidized and capitalized equipment) as our management believes it is a more
comprehensive measure of how much we are spending to acquire subscribers. We also include all new
DISH Network subscribers in our calculation, including DISH Network subscribers added with little
or no subscriber acquisition costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consists primarily of
employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems,
accounting and finance, including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. It also includes
outside professional fees (e.g., legal, information systems and accounting services) and other
items associated with facilities and administration. Following the Spin-off, the general and
administrative expenses associated with the business and assets distributed to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off will no longer be reflected in our General and administrative
expenses.
Interest expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest expense, prepayment premiums and
amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our senior debt and convertible subordinated
debt securities (net of capitalized interest) and interest expense associated with our capital
lease obligations.
Other income (expense). The main components of Other income and expense are unrealized gains
and losses from changes in fair value of non-marketable strategic investments accounted for at fair
value, equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates, gains and losses realized on the sale of
investments, and impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA is defined as
Net income (loss) plus Interest expense net of Interest income, Taxes and Depreciation and
amortization. This non-GAAP measure is reconciled to net income (loss) in our discussion of
Results of Operations below.
DISH Network subscribers. We include customers obtained through direct sales, and through
third-party retail networks and other distribution relationships, in our DISH Network subscriber
count. We also provide DISH Network service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts. For
certain of these commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by
an amount approximately equal to the retail price of our most widely distributed programming
package, Americas Top 100 (but taking into account, periodically, price changes and other
factors), and include the resulting number, which is substantially smaller than the actual number
of commercial units served, in our DISH Network subscriber count.
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU). We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other
companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate average monthly revenue per subscriber,
or ARPU, by dividing average monthly Subscriber-related revenues for the period (total
Subscriber-related revenue during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by
our average DISH Network subscribers for the period. Average DISH Network subscribers are
calculated for the period by adding the average DISH Network subscribers for each month and
dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers for each month
are calculated by adding the beginning and ending DISH Network subscribers for the month and
dividing by two.
Subscriber churn rate/subscriber turnover. We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating subscriber churn rate and believe presentations of subscriber churn rates may not be
calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate
percentage monthly subscriber churn by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who
terminate service during each month by total DISH Network subscribers
34
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
as of the beginning of that
month. We calculate average subscriber churn rate for any period by dividing the number of DISH
Network subscribers who terminated service during that period by the average number of DISH Network
subscribers subject to churn during the period, and further dividing by the number of months in the
period. Average DISH Network subscribers subject to churn during the period are calculated by
adding the DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of each month in the period and dividing by
the total number of months in the period.
Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less
Purchases of property and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
35
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Statements of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,810,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,552,063 |
|
|
$ |
258,363 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue. |
|
|
25,052 |
|
|
|
92,922 |
|
|
|
(67,870 |
) |
|
|
(73.0 |
) |
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
8,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,916 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,844,394 |
|
|
|
2,644,985 |
|
|
|
199,409 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
|
1,444,641 |
|
|
|
1,328,621 |
|
|
|
116,020 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
51.4 |
% |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar |
|
|
78,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,253 |
|
|
NM |
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses Other |
|
|
7,664 |
|
|
|
34,919 |
|
|
|
(27,255 |
) |
|
|
(78.1 |
) |
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
62,756 |
|
|
|
(30,942 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
Subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
374,956 |
|
|
|
401,085 |
|
|
|
(26,129 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
129,530 |
|
|
|
157,287 |
|
|
|
(27,757 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
% of Total revenue |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
272,368 |
|
|
|
320,119 |
|
|
|
(47,751 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,339,226 |
|
|
|
2,304,787 |
|
|
|
34,439 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
505,168 |
|
|
|
340,198 |
|
|
|
164,970 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
33,432 |
|
|
|
(19,331 |
) |
|
|
(57.8 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(89,812 |
) |
|
|
(119,500 |
) |
|
|
29,688 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
(7,028 |
) |
|
|
(1,836 |
) |
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(82,739 |
) |
|
|
(87,904 |
) |
|
|
5,165 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
422,429 |
|
|
|
252,294 |
|
|
|
170,135 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(163,846 |
) |
|
|
(95,154 |
) |
|
|
(68,692 |
) |
|
|
(72.2 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
|
$ |
101,443 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network subscribers, as of period end (in millions) |
|
|
13.815 |
|
|
|
13.415 |
|
|
|
0.400 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, gross (in millions) |
|
|
0.730 |
|
|
|
0.890 |
|
|
|
(0.160 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
DISH Network subscriber additions, net (in millions) |
|
|
0.035 |
|
|
|
0.310 |
|
|
|
(0.275 |
) |
|
|
(88.7 |
) |
Average monthly subscriber churn rate |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
|
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) |
|
$ |
67.93 |
|
|
$ |
64.17 |
|
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (SAC) |
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
770,508 |
|
|
$ |
658,481 |
|
|
$ |
112,027 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
36
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
DISH Network subscribers. As of March 31, 2008, we had approximately 13.815 million DISH Network
subscribers compared to approximately 13.415 million subscribers at March 31, 2007, an increase of
3.0%. DISH Network added approximately 730,000 gross new subscribers for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to approximately 890,000 gross new subscribers during the same period in
2007. We believe our gross new subscriber additions have been and are likely to continue to be
negatively impacted by competitive factors, including the expansion
of fiber-based pay TV providers, the effectiveness of certain competitors promotional offers and
market perceptions of the availability of attractive programming, particularly the relative
quantity of HD programming offered. Subscriber growth has also been affected by worsening economic
conditions, including the slowdown in new housing starts as well as by operational inefficiencies
at DISH Network, signal piracy and other forms of fraud.
DISH Network added approximately 35,000 net new subscribers for the three months ended March 31,
2008, compared to approximately 310,000 net new subscribers during the same period in 2007, a
decrease of 88.7%. This decrease primarily resulted from the decrease in gross new subscribers
discussed above, an increase in our subscriber churn rate, and churn on a larger subscriber base.
Our percentage monthly subscriber churn for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was 1.68%,
compared to 1.46% for the same period in 2007. We believe our subscriber churn rate has been and
is likely to continue to be negatively impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited
to, the factors described above impacting subscriber additions, an increase in non-pay
disconnects primarily resulting from adverse economic conditions and continuing effects of customer
commitment expirations.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to lower our subscriber churn rate, or that our
subscriber churn rate will not increase. We believe we can reduce churn if we are successful in
improving customer service and other areas of our operations in which have recently experienced
operational inefficiencies. We also believe that the launch of new HD local channels may help to
reduce subscriber churn in certain markets. However, given the increasingly competitive nature of
our industry, it may not be possible to reduce churn without significantly increasing our spending
on customer retention, which would have a negative effect on our earnings and free cash flow.
Our gross new subscribers, our net new subscriber additions, and our entire subscriber base are
negatively impacted when existing and new competitors offer attractive promotions or attractive
product and service alternatives, including, among other things, video services bundled with
broadband and other telecommunications services, better priced or more attractive programming
packages, including broader HD programming, and a larger number of HD and standard definition local
channels, and more compelling consumer electronic products and services, including DVRs, video on
demand services and receivers with multiple tuners. We also expect to face increasing competition
from content and other providers who distribute video services directly to consumers over the
Internet.
As the size of our subscriber base increases, even if our subscriber churn rate remains constant or
declines, we will be required to attract increasing numbers of new DISH Network subscribers simply
to sustain our historical net subscriber growth rates.
AT&T and other telecommunications providers offer DISH Network programming bundled with broadband,
telephony and other services. Over the past several fiscal quarters a significant percentage of our
gross subscriber additions have been generated through our distribution relationship with AT&T.
Our current distribution relationship with AT&T expires during the fourth quarter of 2008 and AT&T
may decline to renew this relationship or otherwise discontinue or curtail the marketing and
distribution of our services. Our net new subscriber additions and certain of our other key
operating metrics could be adversely affected if AT&T or other telecommunication providers
de-emphasize or discontinue selling our services and we are not able to develop comparable
alternative distribution channels. Because of the size and scope of AT&Ts distribution networks,
it would be difficult for us to replace AT&T as a distribution partner or to develop appropriate
alternatives to replace AT&T as a distribution channel.
Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network Subscriber-related revenue totaled $2.810 billion for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $258 million or 10.1% compared to the same
period in 2007. This increase was directly attributable to continued DISH Network subscriber
growth and the increase in ARPU discussed below.
37
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was $67.93 during the three months ended March 31,
2008 versus $64.17 during the same period in 2007. The $3.76 or 5.9% increase in ARPU is primarily
attributable to price increases in February 2008 and 2007 on some of our most popular programming
packages, higher equipment rental fees resulting from increased penetration of our equipment
leasing programs, other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs, advertising services and
increased penetration of HD programming including the availability of HD local channels. This
increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenues from installation and other services
related to our original agreement with AT&T.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue totaled $25 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of $68 million or 73.0% compared to the same
period during 2007. The decrease in Equipment sales and other revenue primarily resulted from
the distribution of our set-top box business and certain other revenue-generating assets to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, our
set-top box sales to international customers and revenue generated from assets distributed to
EchoStar accounted for $59 million of our Equipment sales and other revenue.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar totaled $9 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2008. As previously discussed, Equipment sales, transitional services and other
revenue EchoStar resulted from our transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar
associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses totaled $1.445 billion during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $116 million or 8.7% compared to the same period 2007.
The increase in Subscriber-related expenses was primarily attributable to higher programming
costs driven in part by the increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers, and higher in-home
service, refurbishment and repair costs for our receiver systems associated with increased
penetration of our equipment lease programs. Subscriber-related expenses represented 51.4% and
52.1% of Subscriber-related revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The decrease in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from an increase in
ARPU described above, a decrease, as a percentage of revenue, in programming costs and costs
associated with our original agreement with AT&T, partially offset by an increase in our in-home
service, refurbishment and repair costs to support DISH Network subscriber growth.
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contracts with programmers to provide
content. Our programming contracts generally require us to make payments based on the number of
subscribers to which the respective content is provided. Consequently, our programming expenses
will continue to increase to the extent we are successful in growing our subscriber base. In
addition, because programmers continue to raise the price of content, our Subscriber-related
expenses as a percentage of Subscriber-related revenue could materially increase absent
corresponding price increases in our DISH Network programming packages.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
totaled $78 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008. As previously discussed,
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar resulted from costs associated with the services
provided to us by EchoStar during the first quarter of 2008, including the satellite and
transponder capacity leases on satellites distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off,
and other digital broadcast operations previously provided internally at cost.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
totaled $8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, a $27 million decrease compared to
the same period in 2007. As previously discussed, prior to the Spin-off, Satellite and
transmission expenses other included costs
associated with the operation of our digital broadcast centers, including satellite
uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and
control, satellite and transponder leases, and other related services. Effective January 1, 2008,
these digital broadcast operation services are provided to us by EchoStar and are included in
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar.
Satellite and transmission expenses are likely to increase further in the future to the extent we
increase the size of our owned and leased satellite fleet, obtain in-orbit satellite insurance,
increase our leased uplinking capacity and launch additional HD local markets and other programming
services.
38
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales totaled $32 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease
of $31 million or 49.3% compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease primarily resulted from
the elimination of the cost of sales related to the distribution of our set-top box business and certain other
revenue-generating assets to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, partially offset by
additional costs related to the transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar. During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, the costs associated with our sales of set-top box to
international customers and revenue generated from assets distributed to EchoStar accounted for $32
million of our Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales.
Subscriber acquisition costs. Subscriber acquisition costs totaled $375 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of $26 million or 6.5% compared to the same period in 2007.
This decrease was primarily attributable to the decline in gross new subscribers, partially offset
by an increase in SAC discussed below.
SAC. SAC was $709 during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to $663 during the same
period in 2007, an increase of $46, or 6.9%. This increase was primarily attributable to an
increase in acquisition advertising costs, more DISH Network subscribers activating higher priced
advanced products, such as HD receivers, and standard definition and HD DVRs. Additionally, our
equipment costs were higher during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as a result of the
Spin-off of our set-top box business to EchoStar. Set-top boxes were historically designed
in-house and procured at our cost. We now acquire this equipment from EchoStar at its cost plus an
agreed-upon margin. The full impact of this margin was not yet realized in the three months ended
March 31, 2008 since, during the period, we were still consuming inventory delivered prior to the
Spin-off that had no mark-up. These increases were partially offset by the increase in the
redeployment benefits of our equipment lease program for new subscribers.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the amount of
equipment capitalized under our lease program for new subscribers totaled approximately $143
million and $189 million, respectively. This decrease in capital expenditures under our lease
program for new subscribers resulted primarily from lower subscriber growth and an increase in
redeployment of equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers, partially offset by
higher equipment costs resulting from higher priced advanced products and the mark-up on set-top
boxes as a result of the Spin-off, discussed above.
Capital expenditures resulting from our equipment lease program for new subscribers have been, and
we expect will continue to be, partially mitigated by, among other things, the redeployment of
equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers. However, to remain competitive we
will have to upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the
costs associated with these upgrades may be substantial. To the extent technological changes
render a portion of our existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned
equipment and consequently would realize less benefit from the SAC reduction associated with
redeployment of that returned lease equipment.
Our SAC calculation does not reflect any benefit from payments we received in connection with
equipment not returned to us from disconnecting lease subscribers and returned equipment that is
made available for sale rather than being redeployed through our lease program. During the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, these amounts totaled $31 million and $15 million,
respectively.
Our Subscriber acquisition costs, both in aggregate and on a per new subscriber activation basis,
may materially increase in the future to the extent that we introduce more aggressive promotions if
we determine that they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons. See further
discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources Subscriber Retention and Acquisition Costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $130 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of $28 million or 17.7% compared to the
same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in headcount
resulting from the distribution of our set-top box business and other assets to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off. General and administrative expenses represented 4.6% and 5.9% of
Total revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease
in the ratio of the expenses to Total revenue was primarily attributable to the decrease in
expenses as a result of the Spin-off, discussed previously.
39
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $272 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, a $48 million or 14.9% decrease compared to the same period
in 2007. The decrease in Depreciation and amortization expense was primarily a result of several
satellite, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets distributed to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. This decrease was partially offset by additional
depreciation expense in 2008 on equipment leased to subscribers resulting from increased
penetration of our equipment lease programs and as a result of the launch of the Anik F3 satellite,
which commenced commercial operation in April 2007.
Interest income. Interest income totaled $14 million during the three months ended March 31,
2008, a decrease of $19 million compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease principally
resulted from lower cash and marketable investment securities balances as a result of the cash and cash equivalents distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off and
lower total percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment securities during the
first quarter of 2008.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense totaled $90 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of $30 million or 24.8% compared to the same period
in 2007. This decrease primarily resulted from a decline in net interest expense and debt
redemption costs during the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, and the
contribution of satellite capital leases to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. This
decrease was partially offset by additional interest during 2008 associated with our capital lease
obligation for the Anik F3 satellite.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $771 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $112 million or 17.0% compared to the same period
in 2007. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
770,508 |
|
|
$ |
658,481 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
75,711 |
|
|
|
86,068 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net |
|
|
163,846 |
|
|
|
95,154 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
272,368 |
|
|
|
320,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
258,583 |
|
|
$ |
157,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of
operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure
for those evaluating companies in the MVPD industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of
income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital
expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our income tax provision was $164 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $69 million compared to the same period in 2007. The
increase in the provision was primarily related to the increase in Income (loss) before income
taxes and an increase in the effective state tax rate due to changes in state apportionment
percentages.
Net income (loss). Net income was $259 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, an
increase of $101 million compared to $157 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
40
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Investment Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days of their maturity to be cash
equivalents. See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for
further discussion regarding our marketable investment securities. Our restricted and unrestricted
cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities as of March 31, 2008 totaled $1.895
billion, including $171 million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities, compared
to $2.961 billion, including $173 million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities
as of December 31, 2007. The $1.066 billion decrease in restricted and unrestricted cash, cash
equivalents and marketable investment securities was primarily related to the contribution of
approximately $1.4 billion of cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, partially offset by the cash flow generated during the
period discussed below.
We have invested in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage backed securities (MBS), which
are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value. Due to recent events in
credit markets, however, the auctions for the ARS investments have failed. Additionally, the recent
events in the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our MBS
investments. The fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a combination of
comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These analyses consider, among other items, the
collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings, and liquidity. These securities were also
compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our ARS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities rather than the credit risk associated with the
underlying collateral, we have recorded an unrealized loss of $15 million, net of tax, to
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of
March 31, 2008, we reclassified $143 million of these investments to non-current assets to reflect
a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from the current and possible
continued illiquidity. The ARS investments held by us at March 31, 2008 are primarily
collateralized by high credit quality assets.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our MBS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities, we have recorded an
unrealized loss of $11 million,
net of tax, to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. As of March 31, 2008, we reclassified $12 million of these investments to
non-current assets to reflect a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from
the current and possible continued illiquidity.
One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries participated in the auction of 700 MHz wireless spectrum
designated by the FCC as Auction 73 (the Auction). On March 20, 2008, the FCC disclosed that the
subsidiary was the provisional winning bidder of 168 E Block licenses in the Auction totaling $712
million and representing coverage of 76% of the U.S. population. As part of the Auction, we made a
deposit of $115 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, which is included in Other
current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the remaining balance of $597
million was paid in April 2008. While the bidding in the Auction has ended, the FCC has not yet
awarded any of the licenses to winning bidders nor is there any prescribed timeframe for the FCC to
review the qualifications of the various winning bidders and award licenses.
We may be obligated to repay or refinance up to $1.5 billion in long-term indebtedness during 2008.
Our $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 53/4% Senior Notes due 2008
will mature in October 2008. In addition, our $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 3%
Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2010 includes a provision under which we may redeem or the
holder may require that we repurchase the convertible notes at their principal amount in July 2008.
We expect to repay these obligations through cash on hand or through debt refinancing. We cannot
predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the future by the current
conditions in credit markets, which may adversely affect our ability to refinance our indebtedness,
including our indebtedness which is subject to repayment or repurchase in 2008 or to secure
additional financing to support our growth initiatives.
The following discussion highlights our free cash flow and cash flow activities during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
41
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Free Cash Flow
We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less Purchases of property
and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We believe free
cash flow is an important liquidity metric because it measures, during a given period, the amount
of cash generated that is available to repay debt obligations, make investments, fund acquisitions
and for certain other activities. Free cash flow is not a measure determined in accordance with
GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for Operating income, Net income, Net cash
flows from operating activities or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Since
free cash flow includes investments in operating assets, we believe this non-GAAP liquidity measure
is useful in addition to the most directly comparable GAAP measure Net cash flows from operating
activities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, free cash flow was significantly impacted by
changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown in the Net cash flows from operating
activities section of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included herein.
Operating asset and liability balances can fluctuate significantly from period to period and there
can be no assurance that free cash flow will not be negatively impacted by material changes in
operating assets and liabilities in future periods, since these changes depend upon, among other
things, managements timing of payments and control of inventory levels, and cash receipts. In
addition to fluctuations resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, free cash flow
can vary significantly from period to period depending upon, among other things, subscriber growth,
subscriber revenue, subscriber churn, subscriber acquisition costs including amounts capitalized
under our equipment lease programs, operating efficiencies, increases or decreases in purchases of
property and equipment and other factors.
The following table reconciles free cash flow to Net cash flows from operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
638,966 |
|
|
$ |
173,685 |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
266,771 |
|
|
|
330,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
905,737 |
|
|
$ |
504,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $465 million increase in free cash flow during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007 resulted from an increase in Net cash flows from operating activities
of $401 million, or 79.5%, and a decrease in Purchases of property and equipment of $64 million,
or 19.4%. The increase in Net cash flows from operating activities was primarily attributable to
an increase in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and
liabilities of $406 million. The decrease in Purchases of property and equipment
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 was primarily
attributable to a decline in spending for equipment under our new subscriber lease program and in
expenditures for satellite construction, partially offset by an increase in spending for equipment
under our existing subscriber lease program. Our future capital expenditures could increase or
decrease depending on the strength of the economy, strategic opportunities or other factors.
Subscriber Turnover
Our percentage monthly subscriber churn for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was 1.68%,
compared to 1.46% for the same period in 2007. We believe our subscriber churn rate has been and
is likely to continue to be negatively impacted by a number of
competitive factors, including the expansion of fiber-based pay TV providers, the
effectiveness of certain competitors promotional offers and market perceptions of the availability
of attractive programming, particularly the relative quantity of HD programming offered.
Subscriber growth has also been affected by worsening economic conditions, including the slowdown
in new housing starts as well as by operational inefficiencies at DISH Network, an increase in
non-pay disconnects primarily resulting from adverse economic conditions, continuing effects of
customer commitment expirations, signal piracy and other forms of fraud.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to lower our subscriber churn rate, or that our
subscriber churn rate will not increase. We believe we can reduce churn if we are successful in
improving customer service and other areas of
42
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
our operations in which have recently experienced
operational inefficiencies. We also believe that the launch of new HD local channels may help to
reduce subscriber churn in certain markets. However, given the increasingly competitive nature of
our industry, it may not be possible to reduce churn without significantly increasing our spending
on customer retention, which would have a negative effect on our earnings and free cash flow.
Our entire subscriber base is negatively impacted when existing and new competitors offer
attractive promotions or attractive product and service alternatives, including, among other
things, video services bundled with broadband and other telecommunications services, better priced
or more attractive programming packages, including broader HD programming and a larger number of
HD and standard definition local channels, and more compelling consumer electronic products and
services, including DVRs, video on demand services and receivers with multiple tuners. We also
expect to face increasing competition from content and other providers who distribute video
services directly to consumers over the Internet. Additionally, certain of our promotions allow
consumers with relatively lower credit scores to become subscribers, and these subscribers
typically churn at a higher rate. However, these subscribers are also acquired at a lower cost
resulting in a smaller economic loss upon disconnect.
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more
HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit
satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover
the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease
additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement
for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical
programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain
competitive and thus have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
As the size of our subscriber base increases, even if our subscriber churn rate remains constant or
declines, we will be required to attract increasing numbers of new DISH Network subscribers simply
to sustain our historical net subscriber growth rates.
AT&T and other telecommunications providers offer DISH Network programming bundled with broadband,
telephony and other services. Over the past several quarters a significant percentage of our gross
subscriber additions have been generated through our distribution relationship with AT&T. Our
current distribution relationship with AT&T expires during the fourth quarter of 2008 and AT&T may
decline to renew this relationship or otherwise discontinue or curtail the marketing and
distribution of our services. Our net new subscriber additions
43
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
and certain of our other key
operating metrics could be adversely affected if AT&T or other telecommunication providers
de-emphasize or discontinue selling our services and we are not able to develop comparable
alternative distribution channels. Because of the size and scope of AT&Ts distribution networks,
it would be difficult for us to replace AT&T as a distribution partner or to develop appropriate
alternatives to replace AT&T as a distribution channel.
Increases in theft of our signal, or our competitors signals, could in addition to reducing new
subscriber activations, also cause subscriber churn to increase. We use microchips embedded in
credit card-sized access cards, called smart cards, or security chips in our receiver systems to
control access to authorized programming content. However, our signal encryption has been
compromised by theft of service, and even though we continue to respond to compromises of our
encryption system with security measures intended to make signal theft of our programming more
difficult, theft of our signal is increasing. We cannot assure you that we will be successful
in reducing or controlling theft of our service.
During 2005, we replaced our smart cards in order to reduce theft of our service. However, the
smart card replacement did not fully secure our system, and we have since implemented software
patches and other security measures to help protect our service. Nevertheless, these security
measures are short-term fixes and we remain susceptible to additional signal theft. Therefore, we
have developed a plan to replace our existing smart cards and/or security chips to re-secure our
signals for a longer term which will commence later this year and is expected to take approximately
nine to twelve months to complete. While our existing smart cards installed in 2005 remain under
warranty, we could incur operational period costs in excess of $50 million in connection with our
smart card replacement program.
We are also vulnerable to fraud, particularly in the acquisition of new subscribers. While we are
addressing the impact of subscriber fraud through a number of actions, there can be no assurance
that we will not continue to experience fraud, which could impact our subscriber growth and churn.
Subscriber Acquisition and Retention Costs
Our subscriber acquisition and retention costs can vary significantly from period to period which
can in turn cause significant variability to our Net income (loss) and Free cash flow between
periods. Our Subscriber acquisition costs, SAC and Subscriber-related expenses may materially
increase to the extent that we introduce more aggressive promotions in the future if we determine
they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons.
Capital expenditures resulting from our equipment lease program for new subscribers have been, and
we expect will continue to be, partially mitigated by, among other things, the redeployment of
equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers. However, to remain competitive we
will have to upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the
associated costs may be substantial. To the extent technological changes render a portion of our
existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned equipment and would
realize less benefit from the SAC reduction associated with redeployment of that returned lease
equipment.
Several years ago, we began deploying receivers that utilize 8PSK modulation technology and
receivers that utilize MPEG-4 compression technology. These technologies, when fully deployed,
will allow more programming channels to be carried over our existing satellites. A majority of our
customers today, however, do not have receivers that use MPEG-4 compression and a smaller but still
significant percentage do not have receivers that use 8PSK modulation. We may choose to invest
significant capital to accelerate the conversion of customers to
MPEG-4 and/or 8PSK in order to
realize the bandwidth benefits sooner. The bandwidth benefits from MPEG-4 and 8PSK can be
independently achieved.
While we may be able to generate increased revenue from such conversions, the deployment of
equipment including new technologies will increase the cost of our consumer equipment, at least in
the short-term. Our expensed and capitalized subscriber acquisition and retention costs will
increase to the extent we subsidize those costs for new and
44
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
existing subscribers. These increases
may be mitigated to the extent we successfully redeploy existing receivers and implement other
equipment cost reduction strategies.
In an effort to reduce subscriber turnover, we offer existing subscribers a variety of options for
upgraded and add on equipment. We generally lease receivers and subsidize installation of receiver
systems under these subscriber retention programs. As discussed above, we will have to upgrade or
replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes. As a consequence, our retention
costs, which are included in Subscriber-related expenses, and our capital expenditures related to
our equipment lease program for existing subscribers, will increase, at least in the short-term, to
the extent we subsidize the costs of those upgrades and replacements. Our capital expenditures
related to subscriber retention programs could also increase in the future to the extent we
increase penetration of our equipment lease program for existing subscribers, if we introduce other
more aggressive promotions, if we offer existing subscribers more aggressive promotions for HD
receivers or receivers with other enhanced technologies, or for other reasons.
Cash necessary to fund retention programs and total subscriber acquisition costs are expected to be
satisfied from existing cash and marketable investment securities balances and cash generated from
operations to the extent available. We may, however, decide to raise additional capital in the
future to meet these requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be
available on acceptable terms, or at all, if needed in the future.
Obligations and Future Capital Requirements
Future maturities of our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,525,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,025,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
Satellite-related obligations* |
|
|
1,753,695 |
|
|
|
949,951 |
|
|
|
124,344 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
471,224 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
191,401 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
10,556 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
136,198 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
93,542 |
|
|
|
30,943 |
|
|
|
34,127 |
|
|
|
14,320 |
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,267,231 |
|
|
|
942,151 |
|
|
|
251,123 |
|
|
|
40,247 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
24,907 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,855,776 |
|
|
$ |
3,430,989 |
|
|
$ |
420,233 |
|
|
$ |
117,766 |
|
|
$ |
1,108,264 |
|
|
$ |
79,067 |
|
|
$ |
578,437 |
|
|
$ |
3,121,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes the $597 million balance payment made in April 2008 for the 700 MHz wireless spectrum. |
On April 14, 2008, Space Systems/Loral, Inc. began the construction of EchoStar XV, our direct
broadcast satellite expected to launch during 2010. This satellite will enable better bandwidth utilization, provide back-up protection for
our existing offerings, and could allow DISH Network to offer other value-added services.
We expect that our future working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements will
be satisfied from existing cash and marketable investment securities balances, cash generated from
operations or through new additional capital. However, current dislocations in the credit markets,
which have significantly impacted the availability and pricing of financing, particularly in the
high yield debt and leveraged credit markets, may significantly constrain our ability to obtain
financing to support our growth initiatives. These developments in the credit markets may have a
significant effect on our cost of financing and our liquidity position and may, as a result, cause
us to defer or abandon profitable business strategies that we would otherwise pursue if financing
were available on acceptable terms.
Our ability to generate positive future operating and net cash flows is dependent upon, among other
things, our ability to retain existing DISH Network subscribers. There can be no assurance we will
be successful in executing our business plan. The amount of capital required to fund our future
working capital and capital expenditure needs will vary, depending on, among other things, the rate
at which we acquire new subscribers and the cost of subscriber acquisition and retention, including
capitalized costs associated with our new and existing subscriber equipment lease programs. The
amount of capital required will also depend on the levels of investment necessary to support
possible strategic initiatives including our plans to expand our national and local HD offering.
Our capital
45
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
expenditures will vary depending on the number of satellites leased or under
construction at any point in time. Our working capital and capital expenditure requirements could
increase materially in the event of, among other factors, increased competition for subscription
television customers, significant satellite failures, or general economic downturn. These factors
could require that we raise additional capital in the future. There can be no assurance that we
could raise all required capital or that required capital would be available on acceptable
terms.
From time to time we evaluate opportunities for strategic investments or acquisitions that may
complement our current services and products, enhance our technical capabilities, improve or
sustain our competitive position, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. We may make
investments in or partner with others to expand our business into mobile and portable video, data
and voice services. Future material investments or acquisitions may require that we obtain
additional capital, assume third party debt or other long-term obligations. Also, the plan to
repurchase our Class A common stock extends through December 31, 2008, which could require that
we raise additional capital. The maximum dollar value of shares that may still be purchased
under the plan is $1.0 billion. There can be no assurance that we could raise all required
capital or that required capital would be available on acceptable terms.
Interest on Long-Term Debt
As of March 31, 2008, expected future cash interest payments related to our debt are summarized in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,882,515 |
|
|
$ |
291,699 |
|
|
$ |
287,663 |
|
|
$ |
280,978 |
|
|
$ |
272,391 |
|
|
$ |
208,150 |
|
|
$ |
208,147 |
|
|
$ |
333,487 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
118,377 |
|
|
|
10,563 |
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
|
|
11,440 |
|
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
47,102 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,011,092 |
|
|
$ |
303,929 |
|
|
$ |
302,754 |
|
|
$ |
295,281 |
|
|
$ |
285,846 |
|
|
$ |
220,691 |
|
|
$ |
219,704 |
|
|
$ |
382,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2008, our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
investment securities had a fair value of $1.895 billion. Of that amount, a total of $1.834
billion was invested in: (a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies;
(c) commercial paper and notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in
one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations; (d) instruments with similar risk characteristics to the commercial paper
described above; and (e) auction rate, mortgage and asset-backed securities. The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal
until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make strategic investments and
expand the business. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is
received and used in our business.
Our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities had an
average annual return for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of 3.3%. A hypothetical 10%
decrease in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $6 million in annual
interest income. Further, our returns could be lowered by credit losses should economic conditions
worsen, as discussed below. The value of certain of the investments in this portfolio can be
impacted by, among other things, the risk of adverse changes in securities and economic markets, as
well as the risks related to the performance of the companies whose commercial paper and other
instruments we hold. However, the high quality of these investments (as assessed by independent
rating agencies) reduces these risks. The value of these investments can also be impacted by
interest rate fluctuations.
At March 31, 2008, all of the $1.834 billion was invested in fixed or variable rate instruments or
money market type accounts. While an increase in interest rates would ordinarily adversely impact
the fair value of fixed and variable rate investments, we normally hold these investments to
maturity. Consequently, neither interest rate fluctuations nor other market risks typically result
in significant realized gains or losses to this portfolio. Further, our returns could be lowered
by credit losses should economic conditions worsen, as discussed below. A decrease in interest
rates has the effect of reducing our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since funds
would be re-invested at lower rates as the instruments mature.
We have invested in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage backed securities (MBS), which
are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value. Due to recent events in
credit markets, however, the auctions for the ARS investments have failed. Additionally, the recent
events in the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our MBS
investments. The fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a combination of
comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These analyses consider, among other items, the
collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings, and liquidity. These securities were also
compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our ARS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities rather than the credit risk associated with the
underlying collateral, we have recorded an unrealized loss of $15 million, net of tax, to
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of
March 31, 2008, we reclassified $143 million of these investments to non-current assets to reflect
a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from the current and possible
continued illiquidity. The ARS investments held by us at March 31, 2008 are primarily
collateralized by high credit quality assets.
As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for our MBS investments, which we attribute
primarily to the liquidity of the securities, we have recorded an
unrealized loss of $11 million,
net of tax, to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. As of March 31, 2008, we reclassified $12 million of these investments to
non-current assets to reflect a longer expected holding period for these assets that results from
the current and possible continued illiquidity.
Included in our marketable investment securities portfolio balance is debt and equity of public
companies we hold for strategic and financial purposes. As of March 31, 2008, we held strategic
and financial debt and equity investments of public companies with a fair value of $61 million.
These investments are highly speculative and are concentrated in a small number of companies.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, our strategic investments experienced volatility,
which is likely to continue. The fair value of our strategic and financial debt and equity
investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets, as
well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in,
risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to
significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the
underlying businesses. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of our public strategic debt
and equity investments would result in approximately a $6 million decrease in the fair value of
that portfolio.
47
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued |
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the
carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the related temporary
unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit), net of related deferred income tax.
Declines in the fair value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be other
than temporary are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, thus
establishing a new cost basis for such investment. We evaluate our marketable investment
securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair value of these
securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the
historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors
related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair
value of investments
below cost basis for a continuous period of less than six months are considered to be temporary.
Declines in the fair value of investments for a continuous period of six to nine months are
evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or market-specific factors exist
which would indicate that such declines are other than temporary. Declines in the fair value of
investments below cost basis for a continuous period greater than nine months are considered other
than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent specific factors to the contrary.
As of March 31, 2008, we had accumulated unrealized gains (losses) net of related tax effect of $42
million in losses as a part of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total
stockholders equity (deficit). During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we did not record
any charge to earnings for other than temporary declines in the fair value of our marketable
investment securities. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recognized
realized and unrealized net gains on marketable investment securities of $2 million. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008, our strategic investments have experienced and continue to
experience volatility. If the fair value of our strategic marketable investment securities
portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware of any market or company specific
factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may be
required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to the amount of the decline in fair
value.
We also have several strategic investments in certain equity securities which are included in
Other noncurrent assets, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our other investment
securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost method |
|
$ |
68,391 |
|
Equity method |
|
|
47,717 |
|
Fair value method |
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, we account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either the equity method or
cost method of accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not publicly traded, it
is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments; however, these
investments are subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and
current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our
investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material
litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these
equity investments is not estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances that may
indicate an impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the investment.
We also have a strategic investment in non-public preferred stock, public common stock and
convertible debt of a foreign public company. The debt, which is convertible into the issuers
publicly traded common shares, is accounted for under the fair value method with changes in fair
value reported each period as unrealized gains or losses in Other income or expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We estimate the fair value of the convertible
debt using certain assumptions and judgments in applying a discounted cash flow analysis and the
Black-Scholes option pricing model including the fair market value of the underlying common stock
price as of that date. During 2006, we converted a portion of the convertible debt to public
common shares and determined
48
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued |
that we have the ability to significantly influence the operating
decisions of the issuer. Consequently, we account for the common share component of this
investment under the equity method of accounting. As a result of our change to equity method
accounting, we evaluate the common share component of this investment on a quarterly basis to
determine whether there has been a decline in the value that is other than temporary. Because the
shares are publicly traded, this quarterly evaluation considers the fair market value of the common
shares in addition to the other factors described above for equity and cost method investments.
When impairments occur related to our foreign investments, any Cumulative translation adjustment
associated with these investments will remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit) on
our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until the investments are sold or otherwise liquidated;
at which time, they will be released into our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The changes in the fair value and impairments of our other investment securities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
$ |
(4,632 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
As of March 31, 2008, we had fixed-rate debt, mortgages and other notes payable of $5.550 billion
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We estimated the fair value of this debt to be
approximately $5.341 billion using quoted market prices for our publicly traded debt, which
constitutes approximately 90% of our debt, and an analysis based on certain assumptions discussed
below for our private debt. In completing our analysis for our private debt, we evaluate market
conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available
information. In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding credit spreads,
volatility, and the impact of these factors on the value of the notes. The fair value of our debt
is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% decrease in assumed interest
rates would increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $162 million. To the extent
interest rates increase, our costs of financing would increase at such time as we are required to
refinance our debt. As of March 31, 2008, a hypothetical 10% increase in assumed interest rates
would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $35 million.
In general, we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes, but
we may do so in the future.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
49
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast,
Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license the patent portfolio that it has acquired. The
suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent), 5,253,275 (the
275 patent), 5,550,863 (the 863 patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the 702
patent). The 992, 863, 720 and 702 patents have been asserted against us.
The patents relate to various systems and methods related to the transmission of digital data. The
992 and 702 patents have also been asserted against several Internet content providers in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California. During 2004 and 2005, the
Court issued Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702 patents were not as broad as Acacia
had contended, and that certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. The Court issued
additional claim construction rulings on December 14, 2006, March 2, 2007, October 19, 2007, and
February 13, 2008. On March 12, 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for filing
dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to stipulate
that all claims in the suit are invalid according to various of the Courts claim constructions and
argues that the case should proceed immediately to the Federal Circuit. The Court has set a
hearing for May 6, 2008, at which time it will determine whether the parties will proceed with
additional invalidity motions or enter final judgment based on Acacias agreement that all asserted
claims are invalid.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the
patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit
alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and
receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The 066 patent relates to
certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on
removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our
products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving
us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
ruled the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case back to the District Court. During June 2006,
Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The
Court has stayed the case pending reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
50
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. We filed a motion to dismiss, which the court granted with
leave for plaintiffs to amend their complaint. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We
cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Datasec
During April 2008, Datasec Corporation (Datasec) sued us and DirecTV Corporation in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 6,075,969 (the 969 patent). The 969 patent was issued in 2000 to inventor Bruce
Lusignan, and is entitled Method for Receiving Signals from a Constellation of Satellites in
Close Geosynchronous Orbit.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system
architecture. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or
determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Distant Network Litigation
During October 2006, a District Court in Florida entered a permanent nationwide injunction
prohibiting us from offering distant network channels to consumers effective December 1, 2006.
Distant networks are ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox network channels which originate outside the community
where the consumer who wants to view them, lives. We have turned off all of our distant network
channels and are no longer in the distant network business. Termination of these channels resulted
in, among other things, a small reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and free cash
flow, and a temporary increase in subscriber churn. The plaintiffs in that litigation allege that
we are in violation of the Courts injunction and have appealed a District Court decision finding
that we are not in violation. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with
any degree of certainty the outcome of the appeal or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial
paper. The complaint alleges that Enrons October 2001 purchase of its commercial paper was a
fraudulent conveyance and voidable preference under bankruptcy laws. We dispute these allegations.
We typically invest in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest
rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the
time of our investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and low
risk. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty
the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
In July 2006, we, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to
declare that they and we do not
51
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505 patent. Trial is not currently
scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action until the Federal Circuit has resolved
DirecTVs appeal. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment against DirecTV and
ordered a new trial. We are evaluating the Federal Circuits decision to determine the impact on
our action.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Global Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent). This patent, which involves
satellite reception, was issued in September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. Based on the PTOs
decision, we have asked the District Court to stay the litigation until the reexamination
proceeding is concluded. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe the 702 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages,
which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify
certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any
degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or
damages.
Katz Communications
On June 21, 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490 (the 490 patent), 5,109,414 (the 414
patent), 4,965,825 (the 825 patent), 5,233,654 (the 654 patent), 5,335,277 (the 277 patent),
and 5,887,243 (the 243 patent), all of which were issued to John Harvey and James Cuddihy as
named inventors. The 490 patent, the 414 patent, the 825 patent, the 654 patent and the 277
patent are defined as the Harvey Patents. The Harvey Patents are entitled Signal Processing
Apparatus and Methods. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that our DBS system receives
program content at broadcast reception and satellite uplinking facilities and transmits such
program content, via satellite, to remote satellite receivers. The lawsuit further alleges that
we infringe the Harvey Patents by transmitting and using a DBS signal specifically encoded to
enable the subject receivers to function in a manner that infringes the Harvey Patents, and by
selling services via DBS transmission processes which infringe the
Harvey Patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
52
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal court attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We are vigorously defending against the suits and have asserted a
variety of counterclaims. The federal court action has been stayed during the pendency of the
state court action. We filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts and against all
plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for additional time to conduct discovery to enable them
to respond to our motion. The Court granted limited discovery which ended during 2004. The
plaintiffs claimed we did not provide adequate disclosure during the discovery process. The Court
agreed, and denied our motion for summary judgment as a result. The final impact of the Courts
ruling cannot be fully assessed at this time. During April 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs
class certification motion. Trial has been set for August 2008. We intend to vigorously defend
this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the
extent of any potential liability or damages.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp. (Superguide) filed suit against us, DirecTV, Thomson and others in
the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division,
alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (the 211 patent), 5,293,357 (the 357
patent) and 4,751,578 (the 578 patent) which relate to certain electronic program guide functions,
including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and
declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount.
On summary judgment, the District Court ruled that none of the asserted patents were infringed by
us. These rulings were appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
During 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Courts
findings and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. In 2005,
Superguide indicated that it would no longer pursue infringement allegations with respect to the
211 and 357 patents and those patents have now been dismissed from the suit. The District Court
subsequently entered judgment of non-infringement in favor of all defendants as to the 211 and
357 patents and ordered briefing on Thomsons license defense as to the 578 patent. During
December 2006, the District Court found that there were disputed issues of fact regarding Thomsons
license defense, and ordered a trial solely addressed to that issue. That trial took place in
March 2007. In July 2007, the District Court ruled in favor of Superguide. As a result,
Superguide will be able to proceed with its infringement action against us, DirecTV and Thomson.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the 578 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
electronic programming guide and related features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Tivo Inc.
On January 31, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed
the jurys verdict of infringement on Tivos software claims, upheld the award of damages from
the district court, and ordered that the stay of the district courts injunction against us, which
was issued pending appeal, will dissolve when the appeal becomes final. The Federal Circuit,
however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims, and remanded such
claims back to the district court for further proceedings. We are appealing the Federal Circuits
ruling to the United States Supreme Court.
In addition, we have developed and deployed next-generation DVR software to our customers DVRs.
This improved software is fully operational and has been automatically downloaded to current
customers (the Design-
53
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Around). We have formal legal opinions from outside counsel that conclude that our Design-Around
does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either the hardware or software
claims of Tivos patent.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (SFAS 5), we recorded a total reserve of $129 million on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the jury verdict, supplemental damages and pre-judgment
interest awarded by the Texas court. This amount also includes the estimated cost of any software
infringement prior to the Design-Around, plus interest subsequent to the jury verdict.
If the Federal Circuits decision is upheld and Tivo decides to challenge the Design-Around, we
will mount a vigorous defense. If we are unsuccessful in subsequent appeals or in defending
against claims that the Design-Around infringes Tivos patent, we could be prohibited from
distributing DVRs, or be required to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that
we currently offer to consumers. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our
competitors who could offer this functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that
functionality through other manufacturers, the adverse affect on our business could be material.
We could also have to pay substantial additional damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability
with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for 2007 includes a detailed
discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below updates, and should be read in
conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for 2007.
Our gross subscriber additions and certain of our other key operating metrics could be adversely
affected if AT&T were to discontinue selling our services or reduce their marketing of our
services.
Over the past several quarters, a significant percentage of our gross subscriber additions have
been generated from our distribution relationship with AT&T. Our current distribution relationship
with AT&T expires in the fourth quarter of 2008 and AT&T may decline to renew this relationship or
otherwise discontinue or curtail the marketing and distribution of our services to its customers.
Even if it continues the distribution relationship, AT&T may not continue to market and sell our
services in the same manner as it has historically. If AT&T chooses not to renew its distribution
relationship with us or it seeks to modify the terms of this relationship, there could be a
significant negative impact on our business. Because of the size and scope of AT&Ts distribution
networks, it would be difficult for us to replace AT&T as a distribution partner or otherwise
develop comparable alternative distribution channels if AT&T were to discontinue selling our
services or reduce its marketing efforts.
We currently depend on EchoStar for substantially all of our FSS and digital broadcast operations.
EchoStar is currently our key provider of transponder leasing and our sole provider of digital broadcast operation
services. Because these services are provided pursuant to contracts that generally expire on
January 1, 2010, EchoStar will have no obligation to provide us transponder leasing or digital
broadcast operation services after that date. Therefore, if we are unable to extend these
contracts with EchoStar, or we are unable to obtain similar contracts from third parties after that
date, there could be a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial position.
We have made significant commitments to acquire 700 MHz wireless licenses and will be required to
make significant additional investments to commercialize this license.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network participated in the auction of 700 MHz wireless spectrum
designated by the FCC as Auction 73. On March 20, 2008, the FCC disclosed that the subsidiary was
the provisional winning
54
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
bidder of 168 E Block licenses, or the 700 MHz Licenses, in Auction 73 representing coverage of
76% of the U.S. population for a total bid of $712 million.
In addition to the cost to acquire the 700 MHz Licenses, we expect to invest a significant amount
to develop services and infrastructure to effectively utilize the spectrum and provide services to
our customers. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to develop and implement a
business model that will realize a return on these investments and profitably deploy the spectrum
represented by the 700 MHz Licenses.
Furthermore, the market values of wireless licenses may vary significantly in the future. In
particular, valuation swings could occur if:
|
|
|
consolidation in the wireless industry allows or requires carriers to sell significant
portions of their wireless spectrum holdings; |
|
|
|
|
a sudden large sale of spectrum by one or more wireless providers occurs; or |
|
|
|
|
market prices decline as a result of the sale prices in FCC auctions. |
In addition, the price of wireless licenses could decline as a result of the FCCs pursuit of
policies designed to increase the number of wireless licenses available in each of our markets. For
example, the 700 MHz Licenses that we acquired were only recently made available by the FCC. If
the market value of our 700 MHz Licenses were to decline significantly, the value of our 700 MHz
Licenses could be subject to non-cash impairment charges. We assess potential impairments to our
indefinite-lived intangible assets, including our 700 MHz Licenses, annually and when there is
evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment condition may exist.
Estimates of the fair value of our 700 MHz Licenses are based primarily on available market prices,
including successful bid prices in FCC auctions and selling prices observed in wireless license
transactions.
A portion of our short-term investment portfolio is invested in auction rate securities and as a
result of unsuccessful auctions, a portion of our portfolio has restricted liquidity. If the
credit ratings of these securities we hold deteriorate or the lack of liquidity in the marketplace
becomes prolonged, we may be required to adjust the carrying value of these investments through an
impairment charge.
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in auction rate securities and mortgage backed
securities. The markets associated with these investments have experienced zero or greatly reduced
liquidity in recent months. We currently deem the declines in fair value associated with these
securities to be not other than temporary and have reflected them in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Should the credit
ratings of these securities deteriorate or the lack of liquidity in the marketplace become
prolonged, we may deem any declines in fair value to be other than temporary and would then record
them as impairment charges on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We May Be Required to Raise and Refinance Indebtedness During Unfavorable Market Conditions.
During 2008, we will have up to $1.5 billion in long-term debt come up for repayment or repurchase.
In addition, our business plans may require that we raise additional debt to capitalize on our
business opportunities. Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult
for issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets at reasonable rates.
Currently, we have not been materially impacted by events in the current credit market. However, we
cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the future by the current
conditions which may adversely affect our ability to refinance our indebtedness, including our
indebtedness which is subject to repayment or repurchase in 2008 or to secure additional financing
to support our growth initiatives.
55
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
We have limited satellite capacity and satellite failures or launch delays could adversely affect
our business.
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more
HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit
satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover
the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may
need to acquire or lease additional satellite capacity or relocate
one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement for the
failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged
loss of critical programming or a significant delay in our plans to
expand programming as necessary to remain competitive and thus have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information regarding purchases of our Class A common stock from
January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Approximate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Shares that May Yet be |
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
(a) |
|
|
Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs (b) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
January 1 - January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
February 1 - February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
March 1 - March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the period from January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008, we did not repurchase any of
our Class A common stock pursuant to our repurchase program. |
|
(b) |
|
Our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common
stock on August 9, 2004. Prior to 2007, we purchased a total of 13.6 million shares for $374
million under this plan. During November 2007, our Board of Directors authorized an increase
in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the plan, such that we are
currently authorized to repurchase up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our outstanding
shares through and including December 31, 2008. Purchases under our repurchase program may be
made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule 10b5-1 trading
plans, |
56
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
subject to market conditions and other factors. We may elect not to purchase the maximum amount of
shares allowable under this program and we may also enter into additional share repurchase programs
authorized by our Board of Directors.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
10.1o
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Transponder Service Agreement, dated March 11, 2008, between Bell
ExpressVu Limited Partnership, acting through its general partner Bell ExpressVu
Inc., on the one hand, and EchoStar and DISH Network (solely as to
the obligation set forth in Section 19.10), on the other hand. |
|
|
|
10.2o
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Transponder Service Agreement, dated March 11, 2008, between EchoStar and
DISH Network L.L.C. |
|
|
|
31.1o
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2o
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1o
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2o
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
99.1*
|
|
Separation Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation, Commission File
No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.2*
|
|
Transition Services Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.3*
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.4*
|
|
Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.5*
|
|
Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar, EchoStar Acquisition
L.L.C., Echosphere L.L.C., EchoStar DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and DISH Network (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.4 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation, Commission File No.
001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.6*
|
|
Management Services Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.7*
|
|
Receiver Agreement between EchoSphere L.L.C. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.8*
|
|
Broadcast Agreement between EchoStar and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
o |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference. |
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Date: May 12, 2008
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
10.1o
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Transponder Service Agreement, dated March 11, 2008, between Bell
ExpressVu Limited Partnership, acting through its general partner Bell ExpressVu
Inc., on the one hand, and EchoStar and DISH Network (solely as to the obligation set forth in Section 19.10), on the other hand. |
|
|
|
10.2o
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Transponder Service Agreement, dated March 11, 2008, between EchoStar and
DISH Network L.L.C. |
|
|
|
31.1o
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2o
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1o
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2o
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
99.1*
|
|
Separation Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation, Commission File
No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.2*
|
|
Transition Services Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.3*
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.4*
|
|
Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.5*
|
|
Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar, EchoStar Acquisition
L.L.C., Echosphere L.L.C., EchoStar DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and DISH Network (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.4 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation, Commission File No.
001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.6*
|
|
Management Services Agreement between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.7*
|
|
Receiver Agreement between EchoSphere L.L.C. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
99.8*
|
|
Broadcast Agreement between EchoStar and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Form 10 of EchoStar Holding Corporation,
Commission File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
o |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference. |
59