UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934
Filed by
the Registrant x
Filed by
a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the
appropriate box:
¨ |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
¨ |
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
x |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
¨ |
Definitive
Additional Materials |
¨ |
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨ |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
1) Title of
each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2) Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
3) |
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined): |
4) Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
¨ Fee paid
previously with preliminary materials.
¨ |
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
1) |
Amount
Previously Paid: |
|
2) |
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
STRATASYS,
INC.
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Time and Date |
3:30 p.m.
Central Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 5, 2005 |
Place |
Stratasys,
Inc. (Manufacturing Facility) |
|
7640
Commerce Way |
|
Eden
Prairie, Minnesota 55344 |
|
|
Items of
Business |
|
· |
To
elect six directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and
until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. |
· |
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
Record Date |
You
are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder as of the close of business
on April 1, 2005. |
|
|
Voting |
We urge you to read this proxy statement and
vote your shares promptly. You may vote your shares in person by attending
the Annual Meeting or by signing and returning the form of proxy in the
enclosed envelope. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is
voted, and if you wish, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in
person even if you have previously signed a proxy. Specific instructions
to be followed in order to vote are set forth on the enclosed proxy card
or voting instruction form provided by your broker, trustee or nominee.
|
By Order
of the Board of Directors
Thomas W.
Stenoien
Chief
Operating Officer and Secretary
This
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and form of proxy are
first being distributed on or about April 7, 2005.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
Questions
and Answers About the Proxy Materials and the Annual
Meeting |
1 |
Corporate
Governance |
6 |
Structure
of the Board of Directors |
6 |
Board
Independence |
6 |
Availability
of Information |
6 |
Meetings
of the Board |
6 |
Board
Committees |
7 |
Consideration
of Director Nominees |
8 |
Director
Compensation Policies |
8 |
Executive
Officers |
9 |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
9 |
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions |
9 |
Proposal
1. Election of Directors |
10 |
Nominees
for Election as Directors |
10 |
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
12 |
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance |
13 |
Independent
Auditors |
14 |
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services |
14 |
Report
of the Audit Committee |
15 |
Executive
Compensation |
16 |
Report
of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation |
16 |
Stock
Performance Graph |
18 |
Summary
Compensation Table |
19 |
Option
Grants in Last Fiscal Year |
20 |
Aggregated
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values |
20 |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information |
21 |
|
STRATASYS,
INC.
14950
Martin Drive
Eden
Prairie, Minnesota 55344-2020
952.937.3000
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MAY
5, 2005
|
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS
ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS
AND
THE ANNUAL MEETING
Why
am I receiving these materials?
We sent
you this proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy because our Board of
Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held at 3:30 p.m., Central Daylight Time, on May 5, 2005, at
our manufacturing facility located at 7640 Commerce Way, Eden Prairie,
Minnesota 55344. This
proxy statement provides information that we are required to provide to you
under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the
purpose of assisting you in voting your shares.
How
can
I obtain Stratasys’ Form 10-K?
A copy of
our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A is enclosed as a part of our 2004 Annual
Report to Stockholders (including beneficial owners of our common stock). Our
Form 10-K/A is also available via our website at www.stratasys.com, or via
the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Stockholders may also obtain a copy of our Form 10-K/A free of charge upon
written request to Stratasys, Inc., Attention: Secretary, 14950 Martin Drive,
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344.
What
items of business will be voted on at the Annual
Meeting?
· |
The
election of six directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. |
We will
also consider any other business that is properly brought before the Annual
Meeting.
How
does the Board recommend I vote?
Our Board
recommends that you vote FOR each of
the named director nominees.
What
shares can I vote?
Our only
class of stock outstanding is common stock, par value $.01 per share (“Common
Stock”). Each share of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on
the record date, April 1, 2005, is entitled to one vote on all items of business
at the Annual Meeting. You may vote all shares you owned at that time, which may
be (1) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record and (2)
shares held for you as beneficial owner through a broker, trustee or other
nominee such as a bank. On the record date, there were 10,443,017 shares of
Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote. There were 103 stockholders of
record on the record date. The closing price of the Common Stock for that date,
as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market, was $28.25.
What
is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a
beneficial owner?
Most
stockholders hold their shares through a broker or other nominee rather than
directly in their own names. As summarized below, there are some distinctions
between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholder
of Record
If your
shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, North
American Transfer Company, you are considered to be, with respect to those
shares, a stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent
directly to you by Stratasys. You should have certificates for those shares. As
the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy
directly to our proxy holders or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We
have enclosed a proxy card for your use.
Beneficial
Owner
If your
shares are held in a brokerage account or by a trustee or nominee, you are
considered to be the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these
proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction
form by the broker, trustee or nominee or an agent hired by the broker, trustee
or nominee. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker,
trustee or nominee how to vote, and you are also invited to attend the Annual
Meeting.
As a
beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares
directly at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the
broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote
the shares at the Annual Meeting. Your broker, trustee or nominee has enclosed
or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker, trustee
or nominee how to vote your shares.
How
can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?
Shares
held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted on a ballot. Shares
held beneficially in street name may be voted on a ballot only if you bring a
legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving
you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting,
we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instruction form as
described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to
attend the Annual Meeting.
How
can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?
Whether
you hold shares directly as a stockholder of record or beneficially in street
name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the Annual
Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy.
If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting
voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee. For directions on how to
vote, please refer to the instructions below and those on the proxy card or
voting instruction form you are provided. Stockholders of record may submit
proxies by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy cards and mailing
them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes. Beneficial owners may vote by
completing, signing and dating the voting instruction forms provided and mailing
them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.
Are
the proxy statement and annual report available
electronically?
This
proxy statement and our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are available on our
website at www.stratasys.com, or at
the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Can
I change my vote?
If you
are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, you can change your
vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the
Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked,
unless you vote again. You may also revoke your proxy at any time before it is
voted by sending a written notice of revocation or by submitting a signed proxy
bearing a later date, in either case, to Stratasys, Inc., Attention: Secretary,
14950 Martin Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, or by notifying our Secretary
at the Annual Meeting. We must receive any such revocation of proxy by 5:00
p.m., Central Daylight Time, on May 4, 2005, for it to be
effective.
If your
shares are held in street name or by a broker, trustee or nominee, you may
change your vote by following the instructions provided to you by your broker,
trustee or nominee. If you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, trustee
or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, you can change your vote by
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
What
is the quorum required in order
to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?
A
majority of the shares outstanding at the record date must be present at the
Annual Meeting in order to establish the quorum necessary to hold the meeting
and conduct business. Shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if the
stockholder attends the meeting in person or is represented at the meeting by
proxy.
What
is the voting requirement to
approve the election of directors and any other proposal and how are votes
counted?
Directors
are elected by a plurality of the votes cast for the election of directors at
the Annual Meeting. In the election of directors, you may vote for all of the
nominees or you may withhold your vote with respect to one or more of the
nominees. You may vote for any other proposals properly brought before the
Annual Meeting, or you may abstain. If you abstain, the abstention has the same
effect as a vote against the proposal. If you provide specific instructions
(mark boxes) with regard to certain proposals, your shares will be voted as you
instruct. If you sign and return your proxy card or voting instruction form
without giving specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance
with the recommendations of the Board. The proxy holders will vote in their
discretion on any other matters that properly come before the Annual
Meeting.
If you
are a stockholder of record and do not return your proxy card, your shares will
not be voted. However, if you hold shares beneficially in street name, the
result will be different. If you do not return the voting instruction form, your
broker may vote your shares in certain circumstances and on certain proposals.
Where brokers are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority for
beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions (commonly referred
to as “broker non-votes”), those shares will be included in determining the
presence of a quorum at the meeting, but are not considered “present” for the
purposes of voting on non-discretionary matters. Such shares have no impact on
the outcome of such proposals.
What
happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual
Meeting?
Other
than the proposal described in this proxy statement, we are not aware of any
other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the
persons named as proxy holders, S. Scott Crump and Thomas W. Stenoien, will have
the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented
for a vote at the Annual Meeting in accordance with their best judgment. If for
any unforeseen reason any of our nominees is not available as a candidate for
reelection as a director, the proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other
candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the Board.
Who
will count
the votes?
We will
appoint two individuals to act as inspectors of election to tabulate the votes
cast at the Annual Meeting.
What
does
it mean if I receive more than one set of voting
materials?
It means
you have multiple accounts with the transfer agent and/or with brokers and
banks. Please complete, sign, date and return to us each proxy card and voting
instruction form you receive.
Who
will pay the costs
of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?
Stratasys
is making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing, printing,
mailing and distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes with respect
to the Annual Meeting. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the
solicitation of proxies may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic
communication by certain of our directors, officers and other employees, who
will not receive any additional compensation for such activities. We will also
reimburse brokerage firms, banks, and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries
for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding proxy and solicitation
materials to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock.
Where
can I find the
voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We expect
to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final
results in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal
year 2005. You can access that Form 10-Q, and all of our other reports filed
with the SEC, at our website, www.stratasys.com, or at
the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov.
Is
a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting
available?
The list
of stockholders of record as of the record date will be available at the Annual
Meeting. It will also be available during business hours from April 22, 2005
through May 4, 2005, at our principal executive office, 14950 Martin Drive, Eden
Prairie, Minnesota. A stockholder of record of our Common Stock may examine the
list for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting.
What
is the deadline
to propose actions for
consideration at next year’s Annual Meeting?
If a
stockholder intends to present a proposal at our next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, we must receive it no later than December 8, 2005, in order for it
to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that
meeting. If the date of the meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days
from the date the meeting is scheduled to be held under our By-Laws, or if the
proposal is to be presented at any meeting other than the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive office at
a reasonable time before the solicitation of such proxies for such meeting is
made.
Stockholder
proposals for business matters to be conducted at the Annual Meeting, including
nominations of persons to serve as directors of Stratasys, but not to be
considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to
our 2006 Annual Meeting, must be received no later than February 21, 2006. Such
proposals should be directed to our Secretary at 14950 Martin Drive, Eden
Prairie, Minnesota 55344.
|
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Whether
or not you plan to attend the 2005 Annual Meeting, please read this Proxy
Statement and promptly vote your shares by completing, signing, and dating
your enclosed proxy or voting instruction form and returning it in the
enclosed envelope.
|
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Structure
of
the Board of Directors.
Our Board
of Directors currently has six members. Directors are elected to serve until the
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected
and qualified. The Board has three standing committees, the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Board
Independence.
Our Board
of Directors has determined that none of our directors, except S. Scott Crump,
the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ralph
Crump, S. Scott Crump’s father, have a relationship with Stratasys, either as an
officer or employee of Stratasys or its subsidiaries or any other relationship
that, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, would interfere with the
exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. Therefore, each non-management director, other than Ralph Crump, is
independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”)
listing standards for director independence. Only independent directors serve on
the standing committees of the Board, and accordingly, all members of those
committees are also independent. .
Availability
of Information and Communications with the Board.
We have
established a Corporate Governance section on our website, at www.stratasys.com, which
is accessible by clicking Investor Relations and Corporate Governance. The
charter of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Audit Committee
and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our
directors, officers and employees are posted there. Additional materials may be
added in the future. This proxy statement and the 2004 Annual Report on Form
10-K/A are also available on our website. Stockholders may also obtain free
printed copies of these materials by contacting Investor Relations as
follows:
Stratasys,
Inc.
14950
Martin Drive
Eden
Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Attention:
Shane Glenn - Investor Relations
Email:
sglenn@stratasys.com
You may
address written communications to our non-management directors or, if requested,
the full Board of Directors, by mail or courier to Stratasys, Attention:
Secretary, 14950 Martin Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 or by email to
Shane Glenn, sglenn@stratasys.com.
Directors
are expected to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All members of the
Board attended the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Meetings
of the Board of Directors and Executive Sessions.
Our Board
of Directors held 11 meetings in 2004, five of which were conducted by telephone
conference call. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of
Board meetings and of the meetings of committees of the Board on which that
director served during 2004. Independent directors meet separately without
management or non-independent directors present before each scheduled meeting of
the Board of Directors.
Board
Committees.
Audit
Committee. The Audit
Committee is composed of four non-management directors. The current members are
Arnold J. Wasserman (Chairman), Edward J. Fierko, Clifford H. Schwieter and
Gregory L. Wilson, all of whom served on the Committee in 2004. The Board of
Directors has determined that under the rules of the SEC and applicable Nasdaq
listing standards, all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent.
The Board has also determined that Mr. Fierko qualifies under the Nasdaq
standards as “financially sophisticated” and that Messrs. Fierko and Wilson each
meet the SEC criteria for an “audit committee financial expert.”
The Audit
Committee held six meetings in 2004, one of which was conducted by telephone
conference call. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the
appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent auditors,
who report directly to the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee is
responsible for addressing complaints received by Stratasys regarding any
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as
employees’ concerns regarding any questionable accounting or auditing matters.
The duties of the Audit Committee also include reviewing and considering actions
of management in matters relating to audit functions, reviewing reports from
various regulatory authorities, reviewing our system of internal controls and
procedures, and reviewing the effectiveness of procedures intended to prevent
violations of laws and regulations.
The
report of the Audit Committee appears on page 15 of this proxy
statement.
Compensation
Committee. The
Compensation Committee is composed of four non-management directors. The current
members are Clifford J. Schwieter (Chairman), Edward J. Fierko, Arnold J.
Wasserman and Gregory L. Wilson, all of whom served on the Committee in 2004.
The Board of Directors has determined that under applicable Nasdaq listing
standards, all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent.
The
Compensation Committee held seven meetings in 2004. The Compensation Committee
recommends to the Board policies for executive compensation and approves the
remuneration of all our officers. It also administers our stock option and
incentive compensation plans and recommends the establishment of and monitors
the compensation and incentive program for all Stratasys executives.
The
report of the Compensation Committee appears on page 16 of this proxy
statement.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of four non-management
directors. The current members are Gregory L. Wilson (Chairman), Edward J.
Fierko, Clifford H. Schwieter and Arnold J. Wasserman. The Board of Directors
has determined that under applicable Nasdaq listing standards, all of the
members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent. A
current copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is
available on our website at www.stratasys.com.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in 2004. In
connection with its nominating function, the Committee evaluates and recommends
to the Board director nominees to fill vacancies that may occur in the Board of
Directors and its standing committees. In
connection with its corporate governance function, the Committee reviews and
recommends to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to Stratasys,
including the evaluation and recommendation of criteria for membership on the
Board and the composition and structure of the Board and its
committees.
Consideration
of Director Nominees.
Although
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not established minimum
qualifications for director candidates, it will consider, among other
factors:
· |
Experience
with businesses and other organizations of comparable
size |
· |
The
interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board
members |
· |
The
extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board
and any committees of the Board |
In
addition, the Committee considers specific qualities needed to fill vacancies,
such as financial sophistication for potential members of the Audit Committee,
and other characteristics desired to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience
and capability on the Board.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all director
candidates recommended by stockholders, if they meet the criteria referred to
above. Recommendations may be made in writing and sent to the Chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in care of Stratasys, Inc., 14950
Martin Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344. Such recommendations must include
the following information:
· |
the
candidate’s name and address |
· |
the
biographical data of the candidate |
· |
the
candidate’s qualifications |
Members
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will assess potential
candidates on a regular basis. Any stockholder recommendation of a candidate for
election at the 2006 Annual Meeting must be received no later than December 8,
2005 in order for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider
it.
Director
Compensation Policies.
S. Scott
Crump, the Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Treasurer, is the only director who is also an employee of Stratasys. He is not
paid any fee or additional remuneration for service as a member of the Board,
and he is not a member of any Board committee.
Effective
in 2005, directors who are not employees of Stratasys (“non-management
directors”) received an annual fee for Board service of $12,000 as compensation
as well as attendance fees of $1,500 for each meeting of the Board attended in
person and $250 for each meeting attended by telephone. Each independent
director will receive $2,500 per year for committee service and $250 for
attendance at each committee meeting not held in conjunction with a regularly
scheduled meeting of the Board. Directors are reimbursed for travel and other
reasonable expenses incurred for the purpose of attending meetings of the Board
and its committees.
Non-management
directors receive options to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock each year as
additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. The chairman of
the Audit Committee receives an additional $5,000 per year.
Executive
Officers.
In
addition to S. Scott Crump, our Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Treasurer, the following individuals serve as our executive
officers:
Thomas
W. Stenoien, age 54,
was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of Stratasys in March 2005. Mr.
Stenoien served as Chief Financial Officer of Stratasys from May 1997 to March
2005. Mr. Stenoien has also served as Executive Vice President of Stratasys from
2001 to March 2005 and Secretary since 1999. Mr. Stenoien joined Stratasys in
February 1993 as Controller and has also served as Director of Finance.
Robert
F. Gallagher, age 49,
was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of Stratasys in March 2005. Before
joining Stratasys, Mr. Gallagher was the Chief Financial Officer of Selas
Corporation of America. From October 2000 until June 2002, he was Chief
Financial Officer for Visionics Corporation. From October 1989 until June 2000,
Mr. Gallagher was employed by TSI Incorporated.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During
2004,
· |
None
of the members of our Compensation Committee was an officer or former
officer or employee of Stratasys or any of our
subsidiaries; |
· |
None
of the members of our Compensation Committee entered into or agreed to
enter into any transaction or series of transactions with us or any of our
subsidiaries in which the amount involved exceeded
$60,000; |
· |
None
of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or another
board committee with similar functions) of any entity in which one of that
entity’s executive officers served on our Compensation
Committee; |
· |
None
of our executive officers was a director of another entity in which one of
the entity’s executive officers served on our Compensation Committee;
and |
· |
None
of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or another
board committee with similar functions) of another entity in which one of
that entity’s executive officer’s served on our Board of
Directors. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS
AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Related
Transactions Involving Our Directors and Executive
Officers
On
February 12, 2005, each of Ralph E. Crump, Edward J. Fierko, Clifford H.
Schwieter, Arnold J. Wasserman, and Gregory L. Wilson was granted options to
purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock, at the closing price of such stock on
February 28, 2005, in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
These options are immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $28.96 per
share.
|
PROPOSAL
1.
ELECTION
OF
DIRECTORS |
The
directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. Proxies not marked to the contrary will be voted FOR
the
election to the Board of Directors of the following six persons, all of whom are
incumbent directors. All nominees were elected as directors at the 2004 Annual
Meeting. The following information provides the age and business experience as
of March 18, 2005, of the nominees for election. All nominees have consented to
being named as such in this proxy statement and have agreed to serve if elected.
S.
Scott Crump, age 51,
has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and a director
since our inception in 1988 and as Chief Financial Officer from February 1990 to
May 1997. Mr. Crump is, with Lisa H. Crump, his wife, a co-founder of
Stratasys, and he is the inventor of Stratasys’ FDM®
technology. During the period from 1982 to 1988, Mr. Crump was a co-founder and
Vice President of Sales of IDEA, Inc., which is now called SI Technologies, Inc.
(Nasdaq: SISI), a leading manufacturer of force, load and pressure transducers.
Mr. Crump continues to be a director and shareholder of that company. Mr. Crump,
a registered professional engineer, is the son of Ralph E. Crump, a director of
Stratasys.
Ralph
E. Crump, age 81,
has been a director of Stratasys since 1990. Mr. Crump is President of Crump
Industrial Group, an investment firm located in Trumbull, Connecticut. He was a
founder and director of Osmonics, Inc., a manufacturer of reverse osmosis water
filtration devices, until it was acquired by General Electric Company in
February 2003. Mr. Crump is also Chairman of SI Technologies, Inc. In 1962, Mr.
Crump founded Frigitronics, Inc., a manufacturer of ophthalmic goods and medical
instruments, and was its President and Chairman of the Board until December
1986. Mr. Crump is also a director of Mity Enterprises, Inc. (Nasdaq: MITY), a
manufacturer of institutional furniture. He is a Trustee of the Alumni
Foundation of UCLA and a member of the Board of Overseers for the Thayer
Engineering School at Dartmouth College. Mr. Crump is the father of S. Scott
Crump.
Edward
J. Fierko, age 64,
has been a director of Stratasys since February 2002. Since May 2003, Mr. Fierko
has been President of EJF Associates, a consulting firm. From March 2003 to May
2003, Mr. Fierko was Vice President of GE Osmonics, Inc., a manufacturer of
reverse osmosis water filtration devices. From November 1999 through February
2003, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Osmonics, and from
November 1998 to September 1999 he served as Executive Vice President of
Osmonics. From September 1987 to August 1998, Mr. Fierko was President and CEO
of Ecowater International, a holding company with operating companies in the
water, waste and special process treatment industry. Prior to that, Mr. Fierko
held several management positions over a 23-year career at General Electric
Company.
Clifford
H. Schwieter, age 57,
has been a director of Stratasys since 1994. In 2002, Mr. Schwieter became the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Concise Logic, Inc., a software
development company focused on semiconductor design tools. From 1994 to 2002,
Mr. Schwieter was the President and a Managing Director of C.H. Schwieter and
Associates, a management and financial consulting firm. From July 1992 to March
1994, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Centric
Engineering Systems, Inc., which was engaged in the development of mechanical
design and analysis software for computing systems ranging from workstations to
mainframes and massively parallel networked computing environments. Mr.
Schwieter was Vice President and General Manager of the Electronic Imaging
Systems Division of the DuPont Company from 1986 to 1991. From 1971 to 1986, Mr.
Schwieter was with the General Electric Company, where he served as Vice
President of GE’s Calma Company from 1985 to 1986 and was responsible for that
subsidiary’s worldwide business in the mechanical design and factory automation
arena. He was President and Representative Director of GE Industrial Automation,
Ltd., a joint venture between GE and C. Itoh & Company located in Tokyo,
from 1982 to 1985.
Arnold
J. Wasserman, age 67,
has been a director of Stratasys since 1994. Mr. Wasserman has been a principal
of Panda Financial Associates, a leasing/consulting firm, for more than 35
years. Prior to that, he held positions with IBM and Litton Industries. Mr.
Wasserman has consulted with major corporations in the areas of marketing,
advertising and sales. He is the lead independent director and chairman of the
audit committee of MTM Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: MTMC).
Gregory
L. Wilson, age 57,
has been a director of Stratasys since 1994. Mr. Wilson is, with his wife Kathy
R. Wilson, a co-founder of Mity Enterprises, Inc. and has served as Chairman of
the Board of that company since its inception in 1987. From its inception until
May 2002, he also served as President of Mity. From 1982 until 1987, Mr. Wilson
was President of Church Furnishings, Inc., in Provo, Utah. Mr. Wilson served as
a Financial Analyst at the Ford Motor Company and as General Manager of the
Stereo Optical Company in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Wilson also serves on the board
of directors of Broda Enterprises, Waterloo, Ontario, a manufacturer and
distributor of geriatric transport devices.
RECOMMENDATION:
The
Board Of Directors Unanimously Recommends That You Vote FOR
The
Election Of The Nominees Listed In Proposal 1 To Our Board Of
Directors.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP of CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially
owned, directly or indirectly, by each director, each executive officer named in
the Summary Compensation Table on page 19 (the “Named Executive Officers”),
all of our directors and executive officers as a group as of March 18,
2005, and the only entity that reported beneficial ownership of more than 5% of
our outstanding Common Stock as of December 31, 2004
The
number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance
with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is not necessarily
indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Shares of Common Stock
that a person has a right to acquire within 60 days are deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but are not
deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any
other person, except with respect to the percentage ownership of all directors
and executive officers as a group. We based our calculations of the percentage
owned on 10,441,637 shares outstanding on March 18, 2005.
Except as
otherwise indicated, each director and Named Executive Officer (1) has sole
investment and voting power with respect to the securities indicated or
(2) shares investment and/or voting power with that individual’s
spouse.
The
address of each director and Named Executive Officer listed in the table below
is c/o Stratasys, Inc., 14950 Martin Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
55344.
Name
of Beneficial Owner |
|
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
|
Percent
of Class |
|
Directors
and Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Scott Crump |
|
|
369,925 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
3.52 |
% |
Thomas
W. Stenoien |
|
|
40,810 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
* |
|
Ralph
E. Crump |
|
|
386,120 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
3.67 |
% |
Edward
J. Fierko |
|
|
99,200 |
|
(4 |
) |
|
* |
|
Clifford
H. Schwieter |
|
|
72,588 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
* |
|
Arnold
J. Wasserman |
|
|
90,000 |
|
(6 |
) |
|
* |
|
Gregory
L. Wilson |
|
|
108,130 |
|
(7 |
) |
|
1.03 |
% |
All
directors and executive officers (7 persons) |
|
|
1,166,773 |
|
(8 |
) |
|
10.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
Owner of More Than 5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burgundy
Asset Management Ltd. |
|
|
659,900 |
|
(9 |
) |
|
6.3 |
% |
*
Represents less than 1% of our outstanding common stock.
(1) |
Includes
72,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. Does not include 43,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options that are not presently exercisable. Also includes 125,830
shares owned of record by Mr. Crump’s wife and 675 shares owned of record
by Mr. Crump’s child. Mr. Crump disclaims beneficial ownership of the
shares owned by his wife and child. In addition, Mr. Crump disclaims
beneficial ownership of 169,310 shares owned of record and 70,000 shares
issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock options held by
Ralph E. Crump, Mr. Crump’s father, and 146,810 shares owned of record by
Mr. Crump’s mother. |
(2) |
Includes
27,220 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. Does not include 27,020 shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options that are not presently
exercisable. |
(3) |
Includes
70,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. Also includes 146,810 shares owned of record by Mr. Crump’s wife.
Mr. Crump disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares owned by his wife.
In addition, Mr. Crump disclaims beneficial ownership of 171,420 shares
owned of record and 72,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently
exercisable stock options held by S. Scott Crump, Mr. Crump’s son, and
125,830 shares
owned of record by Mr. Crump’s
daughter-in-law. |
(4) |
Includes
82,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. |
(5) |
Includes
70,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. |
(6) |
Represents
90,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. |
(7) |
Includes
70,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. |
(8) |
Includes
481,720 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable stock
options. |
(9) |
Represents
shares of common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2004, as
indicated on the report on Schedule 13G filed by Burgundy Asset Management
Ltd., 181 Bay Street, Ste. 4510, Toronto, Ontario M5J2T3. Burgundy has
sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the 659,900 shares.
|
SECTION
16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers and directors, and
persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities,
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations
also require us to identify in this proxy statement any person subject to this
requirement who failed to file any such report on a timely basis.
Based on
our review of the reports we have received and written representations that no
other reports were required for 2004, we believe that all Section 16(a)
reporting requirements applicable to our executive officers and directors in
2004 were satisfied in a timely fashion, with the exception of one transaction
by Gregory L. Wilson relating to the sale of 5,000 shares of Common Stock on
December 16, 2004, which was filed on Form 4 shortly after the
deadline.
Independent
auditors
The firm
of Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C. (“Rothstein Kass”) audited our financial
statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
Rothstein Kass has served as our independent registered public accounting firm
since December 20, 1994. Rothstein Kass has no financial interest, either direct
or indirect, in Stratasys. At a meeting held on February 12, 2005, the Audit
Committee considered whether the provision of the services, other than the
services described as “Audit Fees” and “Audit-Related Fees” listed below, is
compatible with maintaining the independence of Rothstein Kass, and has
concluded that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining
their independence.
Although
Rothstein Kass has been retained to review Stratasys’ quarterly financials for
the period ended March 31, 2005, the Audit Committee has not yet selected
independent accountants to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005. It was the determination of the Audit Committee that
Stratasys should not be obligated at this time to retain a specific firm of
independent accountants.
No
representative of Rothstein Kass is expected to be present at our Annual Meeting
or to make a statement or respond to questions from stockholders.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
aggregate fees we paid to Rothstein Kass for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 were as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees |
|
$ |
121,488 |
|
$ |
86,165 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
|
Total
Audit and Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
121,488 |
|
|
86,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
Fees(a) |
|
|
9,351 |
|
|
18,128 |
|
All
Other Fees (b) |
|
$ |
9,168 |
|
$ |
8,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
“Tax
fees” consisted of fees for tax compliance and review, and tax planning
and advice. |
(b) |
“All
Other Fees” principally involved 401(k) audit fees in both 2004 and
2003. |
The Audit
Committee’s policy is that all audit and non-audit services to be performed by
our independent auditors must be approved in advance. The policy permits the
Audit Committee to delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members
and requires any member who pre-approves such services pursuant to that
authority to report his decision to the Committee. The Audit Committee has
delegated such authority to its Chair, Arnold Wasserman.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The
Stratasys Board of Directors adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee,
which was amended on March 26, 2004, and is attached as Annex A to Stratasys’
2004 Proxy Statement. Both this Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have
determined that the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter states
appropriate guiding principles for the Audit Committee. In addition, after
evaluating the qualifications of the members of the Audit Committee, the Board
of Directors determined that its members continue to have the independence and
expertise to serve on the Audit Committee as required by all applicable rules
and regulations.
In
accordance with the provisions of our charter, we have (i) reviewed Stratasys’
2004 audited financial statements with management, (ii) discussed with
Stratasys’ independent auditors, Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C. (“Rothstein
Kass”), the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61 (“Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU § 380”) as
modified or supplemented, and (iii) received the written disclosures and the
letter from Rothstein Kass required by Independence Standards Board Standard No.
1, as modified or supplemented. We have also discussed with Rothstein Kass and
received its written confirmation that it remains independent accountants with
respect to Stratasys.
As part
of our responsibilities under our charter, we also reviewed Stratasys’
compliance with its Code of Ethics and the effectiveness of procedures intended
to prevent violation of laws and regulations.
In
addition, we have met with Rothstein Kass prior to the filing of each of
Stratasys’ quarterly reports on Form 10-Q to discuss the results of its review
of the financial information included in those reports.
Management
has represented to us, and Rothstein Kass has confirmed, that Stratasys’
financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
In
performing our oversight function, we relied upon advice and information
received in our discussions with Stratasys’ management, internal accountants,
and independent auditors. This advice and information was obtained at the
Committee meetings held during the year, during which we engaged both management
and Rothstein Kass in current discussions. During nine
of these
meetings, we met separately with Stratasys’ internal auditors and then with
Rothstein Kass. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we have
recommended to the Board of Directors that Stratasys’ audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 be included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for that year.
Dated:
March 31, 2005
|
The
Audit Committee
Arnold
J. Wasserman, Chairman
Edward
J. Fierko
Clifford
H. Schwieter
Gregory
L. Wilson |
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
REPORT
OF THE COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stratasys’
executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors, which has the responsibility for all aspects of the
compensation program for the executive officers of the Stratasys. With respect
to executive compensation, our primary objective is to establish programs that
attract and retain key managers and align their compensation with Stratasys’
overall business strategies, values and performance. To this end, we
established, and the Board of Directors endorsed, an executive
compensation program that consists of three principal components:
Base
Salary
We
conduct an annual performance review of the named executive officers for the
purpose of determining modifications to base compensation based on prevailing
industry salaries, historical compensation levels as compared with past
performance, and expected future contributions of the executives. We then
recommend the appropriate base compensation to the full Board of Directors.
Cash
Bonuses
Stratasys
also offers incentive plans under which executive officers may be paid cash
bonuses. The compensation under these plans is dependent upon the achievement of
certain financial, growth, and performance targets established by the Board of
Directors prior to the start of each fiscal year.
On
February 11, 2005, we approved Stratasys’ bonus plan for fiscal year 2005 for
Stratasys’ “named executive officers” as well as certain other executive
officers of Stratasys (the “2005 Bonus Plan”). In addition, the Committee
determined the target performance criteria with respect to fiscal year 2005
bonuses applicable to the named executive officers.
The
purposes of the 2005 Bonus Plan are to (i) provide incentives to achieve
Stratasys’ growth, profitability and annual and long-term strategic objectives;
(ii) reward performance based on attainment of objectives that are intended to
benefit Stratasys and its stockholders; and (iii) attract, retain, and motivate
key executives. In arriving at our determinations, we considered the executive’s
past contributions to Stratasys’ growth and the expected contribution of the
executive to the Stratasys’ long-term growth attainment.
For
fiscal year 2005, in order to earn the target bonus, an executive must meet the
following objectives, each of which is weighted accordingly: 2005 revenue growth
(approximately 50% of the bonus), 2005 operating profit growth (approximately
30% of the bonus), and 2005 ending backlog (approximately 20% of the bonus).
Stock
Options
Stratasys
also offers stock options as a component of its long-term incentive and
retention program. Stock options are granted at the date of hire and
periodically thereafter. These options align the interest of the executive
officer with those of the stockholders, since it is only through stock
appreciation linked to Stratasys’ performance that the executive will benefit
from these plans. In arriving at our recommendations for the amount of such
grants, we consider the executive’s contribution to Stratasys’ performance in
the past, and the expected contribution of the executive to Stratasys’
long--term growth. Stratasys’ policy is to fix the price of the options at or
above the fair market value on the date of grant, thereby linking the
executive’s value realized directly to the gains realized by Stratasys’
stockholders.
In
connection with the Committee’s annual performance review on February 11, 2005,
the Committee determined and approved cash bonuses and stock options for the
named executive officers in respect of the preceding fiscal year. Bonuses to
each of the named executive officers were paid during fiscal year 2004 and
fiscal year 2005 for the attainment of objectives related to Stratasys’ 2004
performance with respect to revenue growth, operating profit growth, and ending
backlog.
Chief
Executive Officer Compensation
In
arriving at our recommendation
for Mr. Crump’s total compensation, we considered Stratasys’ performance as
measured by revenue, revenue growth, profitability, earnings per share, share
valuation, and corporate objectives. After considering Mr. Crump’s performance
in 2004, we recommended a management-by-objective (“MBO”) profit bonus of
$99,700. Base compensation, determined in early 2004, amounted to $158,543, an
increase from base compensation of $153,113 earned in 2003.
Dated:
March 31, 2005
|
Compensation
Committee
Clifford
H. Schwieter, Chairman
Edward
J. Fierko
Arnold
J. Wasserman
Gregory
L. Wilson |
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The
following graph compares on a cumulative basis the yearly percentage change,
assuming dividend reinvestment, over the last five fiscal years in (a) the total
stockholder return on our Common Stock with (b) the total return on the Nasdaq
(US) Composite Index, and (c) the total return on the information technology
sector of the Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600 Info Tech
Index”). The S&P 600 Info Tech Index consists of 125 of the 600 stocks
comprising the Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index, a
capitalization-weighted index of domestic stocks chosen for market size,
liquidity and industry representation.
The
following graph assumes that $100 had been invested in each of Stratasys, the
Nasdaq (US) Composite Index, and the S&P 600 Info Tech Index on December 31,
1999.
The
immediately preceding sections entitled “Report of the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation” and “Performance Graph” do not
constitute soliciting material for purposes of SEC Rule 14a-9, will not be
deemed to have been filed with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are not to be incorporated by reference
into any other filing that we make with the SEC.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The
following table sets forth information for the periods indicated concerning
compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and each other executive
officer of Stratasys who received the highest compensation for services rendered
to Stratasys with respect to 2004. The individuals named in the table are
sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the “Named Executive
Officers.”
|
|
|
|
Annual
Compensation |
|
Long-Term
Compensation |
|
All
Other Compensation(2) |
|
Name
and
Principal
Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Securities
Underlying
Options(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Scott Crump
Chairman,
President, CEO and Treasurer |
|
|
2004
2003
2002 |
|
$
|
158,543
153,113
148,720 |
|
$
|
99,700(3
100,000(4
79,500(5 |
)
)
) |
|
20,000
30,000
-0- |
|
$
|
3,000
2,231
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
W. Stenoien
Executive
Vice President, CFO and
Secretary |
|
|
2004
2003
2002 |
|
$
|
110,013
106,210
103,194 |
|
$
|
92,500(6
105,000(7
82,900(8 |
)
)
) |
|
10,000
15,000
-0- |
|
$
|
3,000
3,000
2,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As
adjusted, where appropriate, to reflect the 3-for-2 stock split in the
form of a stock dividend which became effective in December
2003. |
(2) |
Represents
employer-matching contributions to a 401(k) plan. This benefit is
available to all full-time employees of
Stratasys. |
(3) |
$67,790
of this bonus was earned in 2004 and paid in
2005. |
(4) |
$71,200
of this bonus was earned in 2003 and paid in
2004. |
(5) |
$44,800
of this bonus was earned in 2002 and paid in
2003. |
(6) |
$54,085
of this bonus was earned in 2004 and paid in
2005. |
(7) |
$66,090
of this bonus was earned in 2003 and paid in
2004. |
(8) |
$41,160
of this bonus was earned in 2002 and paid in
2003. |
OPTION
GRANTS IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR
The
following table shows stock option grants with respect to shares of Common Stock
under our 2002 Long-Term Performance and Incentive Plan and our 1999 Incentive
Stock Option Plan to the Named Executive Officers during the 2004 fiscal year.
We granted options to purchase a total of 120,750 shares to all of our employees
during the 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities |
|
|
Percent
of
Total
Options
Granted
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
Realizable Value At
Assumed
Annual Rates of
Stock
Price Appreciation for
Option
Term |
|
Name |
|
|
Underlying
Options
Granted(1)
(#) |
|
|
In
Fiscal
Year |
|
|
Exercise
or Base Price(1)
($/Sh) |
|
|
Expiration
Date |
|
|
5%
($) |
|
|
10%
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Scott Crump |
|
|
20,000(1 |
) |
|
16.6 |
% |
|
28.85 |
|
|
1/6/2010 |
|
|
159,414 |
|
|
362,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
W. Stenoien |
|
|
10,000(1 |
) |
|
8.3 |
% |
|
28.85 |
|
|
1/6/2010 |
|
|
79,707 |
|
|
181,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These
options vest in five equal annual installments, beginning on January 6,
2005. |
AGGREGATED
OPTION
EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
and
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The
following table includes information regarding the value realized on option
exercises and the market value of unexercised options held by the Named
Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
Shares
Acquired
On |
|
Value |
|
Number
Of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
at FY-End (#) |
|
Value
of Unexercised In-the-
Money
Options at
FY-End
($)(1) |
|
Name |
|
Exercise
(#) |
|
Realized
($) |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Scott Crump |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
418,500 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
826,860 |
|
|
835,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
W. Stenoien |
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
131,973 |
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
31,240 |
|
|
146,381 |
|
|
398,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Based
upon a closing price of $33.56 on the Nasdaq National Market on December
31, 2004. |
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The table
below provides information, as of December 31, 2004, concerning securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
Plan
category |
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights |
|
Weighted
average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and
rights |
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a)) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by
shareholders |
|
|
811,840 |
|
|
$19.20 |
|
|
834,108 |
|
Equity
compensation plans not
approved by shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
811,840* |
|
|
$19.20 |
|
|
834,108 |
|
*Does not
include separate arrangements where we granted warrants to purchase 225,000
shares to investors in an August 2003 private placement exercisable at a
weighted average exercise price of $24.47 per share.