UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
¨ | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 |
NETFLIX, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)
x | No fee required. |
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
1 | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
2 | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
3 | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
4 | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
5 | Total fee paid: |
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
1. | Amount Previously Paid: |
2. | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
3. | Filing Party: |
4. | Date Filed: |
Netflix, Inc.
100 Winchester Circle
Los Gatos, California 95032
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2008
To the Stockholders of Netflix, Inc.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Netflix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), will be held on May 21, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. local time at the Companys corporate headquarters at 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect three Class III directors to hold office until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; |
2. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008; and |
3. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. |
These business items are described more fully in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. Only stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on March 26, 2008 can vote at this meeting or any adjournments that may take place.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. However, to assure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to mark, sign and return the enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope for that purpose. Your stock will be voted in accordance with the instructions you have given. Any stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting may vote in person by attending the meeting even if he or she has previously returned a proxy. Please note, however, that if your shares of record are held by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to attend and vote in person at the meeting, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.
For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours at the address of the Companys executive offices noted above.
By order of the Board of Directors |
David Hyman |
General Counsel and Secretary |
April 2, 2008
Los Gatos, California
NETFLIX, INC.
100 Winchester Circle
Los Gatos, California 95032
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2008
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
General
The attached proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Netflix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2008, at 3:00 p.m. local time (the Annual Meeting), or at any adjournment or postponement of this meeting, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held at the Companys corporate headquarters at 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032.
We intend to mail this Proxy Statement and accompanying proxy card to stockholders on or about April 16, 2008.
Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, and our telephone number is (408) 540-3700. Our Internet website address is www.netflix.com.
Revocability of Proxies
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by delivering to the Companys Secretary, at the address of the Companys executive offices noted above, written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. Please note, however, that if your shares of record are held by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to attend and vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.
Voting and Solicitation
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2008, referred to as the Record Date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 61,547,000 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of record of shares of common stock on that date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
Proxies properly executed, duly returned to the Company and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the specifications made. Where no specifications are given, such proxies will be voted FOR all nominees and FOR all other proposals described in this Proxy Statement. It is not expected that any matters other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement will be brought before the Annual Meeting. If, however, any matter not described in this Proxy Statement is properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy will have authority to vote according to their own discretion.
1
The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by holders of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date. Shares that are voted FOR, AGAINST, WITHHELD or ABSTAIN, referred to as the Votes Cast, are treated as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against a proposal. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but such non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to the particular proposal on which a broker has expressly not voted. Thus, a broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of the voting on a particular proposal.
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to soliciting stockholders by mail and dissemination to its employees, the Company will request that banks and brokers and other persons representing beneficial owners of the shares forward the proxy solicitation material to such beneficial owners, and the Company may reimburse these parties for their reasonable out-of-pocket costs. The Company may use the services of its officers, directors and others to solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic mail, without additional compensation.
Stockholder Proposals
Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the proxy materials for such meeting must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 and must be received by our Secretary no later than December 1, 2008 in order to be included in the Proxy Statement and proxy materials relating to our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A stockholder proposal or a nomination for director that will not be included in our Proxy Statement and proxy, but that a stockholder intends to present in person at the meeting, must generally be submitted to our Secretary no earlier than January 23, 2009, and no later than February 22, 2009.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2008
The proxy statement, notice of Annual Meeting, form of proxy and annual report to stockholders are available at http://ir.netflix.com/annuals.cfm.
You may find our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, on our Investor Relations website at http://ir.netflix.com/sec.cfm.
For directions to attend the Annual Meeting in person, visit our website at http://ir.netflix.com/annuals.cfm.
Stockholders will be able to obtain copies of the annual meeting materials, including proxy statement, notice of annual meeting, form of proxy and annual report to stockholders for future annual meetings by visiting http://ir.netflix.com or sending an e-mail to ir@netflix.com.
2
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees
Three Class III directors, Reed Hastings, Jay C. Hoag and A. George (Skip) Battle, are to be elected at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Hastings and Hoag have each been elected by the Companys stockholders at previous annual meetings. Mr. Battle has been a director of the Company since June of 2005 but has not previously been subject to stockholder election. Mr. Battle was initially identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a candidate for director through his professional activities including his positions with Ask Jeeves and Andersen Consulting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for Messrs. Hastings, Hoag and Battle, each of whom is presently a director of the Company. If any of Messrs. Hastings, Hoag and Battle is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board to fill the vacancy, or if no substitute has been nominated, for the remaining nominees. It is not expected that any of Messrs. Hastings, Hoag and Battle will be unable to serve as a director, and each has agreed to serve as a director of the Company if elected. The term of office of each director elected at this Annual Meeting will continue until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in 2011 or until such directors successor has been duly elected or appointed and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal.
Vote Required; Recommendation of Board
The three candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative Votes Cast will each be elected as Class III directors.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.
Nominee |
Age |
Principal Occupation | ||
Reed Hastings |
47 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, Netflix, Inc. | ||
Jay C. Hoag |
49 | General Partner, Technology Crossover Ventures | ||
A. George (Skip) Battle |
64 | Investor |
Reed Hastings has served as our Chief Executive Officer since September 1998 and our Chairman of the Board since inception. Mr. Hastings served as Chief Executive Officer of Pure Atria Software, a maker of software development tools, from its inception in October 1991 until it was acquired by Rational Software Corporation, in August 1997. Mr. Hastings holds an M.S.C.S. degree from Stanford University and a B.A. from Bowdoin College.
Jay C. Hoag has served as one of the Companys directors since June 1999. Since June 1995, Mr. Hoag has been a General Partner at Technology Crossover Ventures, a venture capital firm. Mr. Hoag serves on the board of directors of Tech Target, TheStreet.com and several private companies. Mr. Hoag holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a B.A. from Northwestern University.
A. George (Skip) Battle has served as one of the Companys directors since June 2005. Mr. Battle was previously Executive Chairman of the Board of Ask Jeeves, Inc. which was acquired by IAC/InterActiveCorp in July 2005. He was Chief Executive Officer of Ask Jeeves from 2000 to 2003. From 1968 until his retirement in 1995, Mr. Battle served in management roles at Arthur Andersen LLP and then Andersen Consulting LLP (now Accenture), where he became worldwide managing partner of market development and a member of the firms executive committee. Educated at Dartmouth College and the Stanford Graduate School of Business, Mr. Battle
3
currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Fair Isaac Corporation, a director of Advent Software, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., and a member of the board of the Masters Select family of mutual funds. He was previously a director of PeopleSoft, Inc. and of Barra, Inc.
Directors Not Standing For Election and Executive Officers
The members of the Board whose terms or directorships do not expire at the Annual Meeting and who are not standing for election at this years Annual Meeting and our executive officers are set forth below:
Name |
Age |
Class/Term Expiration |
Principal Occupation | |||
Directors | ||||||
Timothy M. Haley |
53 | Class II/2010 | Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures | |||
Michael N. Schuh |
64 | Class II/2010 | Managing Member, Foundation Capital | |||
Gregory S. Stanger |
43 | Class II/2010 | Investor | |||
Richard N. Barton |
40 | Class I/2009 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Zillow, Inc. | |||
Charles H. Giancarlo |
50 | Class I/2009 | Managing Director, Silver Lake | |||
Other Executive Officers | ||||||
Barry McCarthy |
54 | | Chief Financial Officer, Netflix, Inc. | |||
Neil Hunt |
46 | | Chief Product Officer, Netflix, Inc. | |||
Ted Sarandos |
43 | | Chief Content Officer, Netflix, Inc. | |||
Leslie Kilgore |
42 | | Chief Marketing Officer, Netflix, Inc. | |||
Patty McCord |
54 | | Chief Talent Officer, Netflix, Inc. |
Timothy M. Haley has served as one of the Companys directors since June 1998. Mr. Haley is a co-founder of Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm, and has been a Managing Director of the firm since October 1999. Mr. Haley has been a Managing Director of Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, since February 1998. From June 1986 to February 1998, Mr. Haley was the President of Haley Associates, an executive recruiting firm in the high technology industry. Mr. Haley currently serves on the board of directors of several private companies. Mr. Haley holds a B.A. from Santa Clara University.
Michael N. Schuh has served as one of the Companys directors since February 1999. From August 1998 to the present, Mr. Schuh has served as a Managing Member of Foundation Capital, a venture capital firm. Prior to joining Foundation Capital, Mr. Schuh was a founder and Chief Executive Officer of Intrinsa Corporation, a supplier of productivity solutions for software development organizations from 1994 to 1998. Mr. Schuh serves on the board of directors of several private companies. Mr. Schuh holds a B.S.E.E. from the University of Maryland.
Gregory S. Stanger has served as one of the Companys directors since June 2005. Mr. Stanger has served as a venture partner at Technology Crossover Ventures, a venture capital firm, since June 2005 and was an executive in residence from December 2003 to June 2005. Mr. Stanger served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and director of Expedia, Inc. from February 2002 to September 2003 and as its Chief Financial Officer from October 1999 to September 2003. Before joining Expedia, he served as Senior Director, Corporate Development of Microsoft Corporation and held other positions within Microsofts Finance and Corporate Development departments since 1991. Mr. Stanger serves on the board of directors of Drugstore.com, Infovell, Inc. and of Global Market Insite, Inc. Mr. Stanger received a B.A. from Williams College and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.
Richard N. Barton has served as one of the Companys directors since May 2002. In late 2004, Mr. Barton co-founded Zillow, Inc. where he is now Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Additionally, Mr. Barton is a Venture Partner with Benchmark Capital. Previously, Mr. Barton founded Expedia, Inc. in 1994 and was its President, Chief Executive Officer and director from November 1999 to March 2003. Mr. Barton was a director of InterActiveCorp from February 2003 until January 2005. Mr. Barton holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from Stanford University.
4
Charles H. Giancarlo has served as one of the Companys directors since April 2007. Currently, Mr. Giancarlo is a Managing Director at Silver Lake, a private equity firm, where he has served since December 2007. Previously, Mr. Giancarlo held a variety of roles at Cisco Systems, Inc., a provider of Internet Protocol (IP)-based networking and other products related to the communications and information technology industry from 1994 through 2007. Most recently, he was President of Cisco-Linksys, LLC, a position he held since June 2004 and Ciscos Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer, a position he held since July 2005. From July 2004 to July 2005, he was Chief Technology Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Giancarlo was Senior Vice President and General Manager of Product Development, from July 2001 to July 2004. He also served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Commercial Business Segment from May 1999 to July 2001, managing one of Ciscos fastest growing business segments. In May 1997, he was appointed to establish Ciscos Global Alliances and ran the division as Senior Vice President until May 1999. In his first Cisco role after joining the company through the acquisition of Kalpana, Inc., Mr. Giancarlo held the title of Vice President of Business Development, from December 1994 to May 1997. Mr. Giancarlo holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Brown University and the University of California at Berkeley, respectively, and an MBA from Harvard University.
Barry McCarthy has served as the Companys Chief Financial Officer since April 1999 and its Secretary from May 1999 to June 2007. From January 1993 to December 1999, Mr. McCarthy was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Music Choice, a music programming service distributed over direct broadcast satellite and cable systems. From June 1990 to December 1992, Mr. McCarthy was Managing Partner of BMP Partners, a financial consulting and advisory firm. From 1982 to 1990, Mr. McCarthy was an Associate, Vice President and Director with Credit Suisse First Boston, an investment banking firm. Mr. McCarthy holds an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A. from Williams College.
Neil Hunt has served as the Companys Chief Product Officer since 2002 and as its Vice President Internet Engineering from 1999 to 2002. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Hunt was Director of Engineering for Rational Software. Mr. Hunt holds a doctorate in computer science from the University of Aberdeen, U.K. and a bachelors degree from the University of Durham, U.K.
Ted Sarandos has served as the Companys Chief Content Officer and Vice President of Content since 2000. Prior to joining Netflix, Mr. Sarandos was Vice President of Product and Merchandising for Video City.
Leslie Kilgore has served as the Companys Chief Marketing Officer (formerly Vice President of Marketing) since March 2000. From February 1999 to March 2000, Ms. Kilgore served as Director of Marketing for Amazon.com, Inc., an Internet retailer. Ms. Kilgore served as a brand manager for The Procter & Gamble Company, a manufacturer and marketer of consumer products, from August 1992 to February 1999. Ms. Kilgore holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a B.S. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
Patty McCord has served as the Companys Chief Talent Officer since 1998. Prior to joining Netflix, Ms. McCord served as Director of Human Resources at Pure Atria, now Rational Software Corporation, where she managed all human resources functions and directed all management development programs from 1994 to 1997.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors, nominees for director and Executive Officers.
Board Meetings and Committees
The Board held seven meetings during 2007. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees on which such director served held in 2007, except for Mr. Giancarlo.
5
As of the date of the Proxy Statement, the Board has four standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee, (2) the Audit Committee, (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee and (4) the Stock Option Committee.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Haley, Hoag and Battle. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to the executive officers and directors of the Company. The Compensation Committee may not delegate these duties. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis below. The Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2007. Each member attended at least 75% of the Compensation Committee meetings in 2007 that were held during the period that the individual served on the Compensation Committee.
The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/documents.cfm
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Haley, Stanger and Schuh, each of whom is independent in compliance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Mr. Stanger is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Audit Committee engages the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the Companys financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Companys independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Companys internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met five times in 2007. Each member attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee meetings in 2007 that were held during the period that the individual served on the Audit Committee.
The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/documents.cfm.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of two non-employee directors, Messrs. Barton and Hoag. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill vacancies on the Board, including re-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met four times in 2007 and all the meetings were attended by both members.
The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/documents.cfm.
Stock Option Committee
The Stock Option Committee of the Board consists of one employee director: Mr. Hastings. The Stock Option Committee has authority to review and approve the stock options granted to employees pursuant to the
6
Companys option grant program. The Board has also authorized certain Company officers to review and approve option grants to employees, other than to themselves or directors or executive officers of the Company. The Board retained the power to adjust, eliminate or otherwise modify the Companys option granting practices, any option allowance or portions thereof not previously granted, including without limitation the monthly option formula.
The Stock Option Committee did not hold meetings in 2007. The Stock Option Committee acts pursuant to powers delegated to it by the Board. The Board has not adopted a written charter for the Stock Option Committee.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the Companys executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on the Companys Board or Compensation Committee. No member of the Companys Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Companys executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.
The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Haley, Hoag and Battle, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. Neither Mr. Haley nor Mr. Hoag nor Mr. Battle had a relationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In addition to Messrs. Haley, Hoag and Battle, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Talent Officer participated in the executive compensation process as described below in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Barton, Battle, Giancarlo, Haley, Hoag, Stanger and Schuh is independent under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market; therefore, every member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee is an independent director in accordance with those standards. There were no related party transactions to be considered in the last fiscal year in the determination of the independence of the directors. See Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions in this Proxy Statement for more information.
Consideration of Director Nominees
Stockholder Nominees
The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the Board as described below under Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors. Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should include the nominees name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under Stockholder Proposals above and addressed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary.
Director Qualifications
In discharging its responsibilities to nominate candidates for election to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee has not specified any minimum qualifications for serving on the Board. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to evaluate, propose and approve candidates with business experience and personal skills in technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting and other areas that may be expected to contribute to an effective Board.
7
Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors
The Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee through management, current Board members, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at periodic meetings of the Nominating and Governance Committee as necessary and discussed by the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time. Candidates may be considered at any point during the year. As described above, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder.
Communications with the Board
The Company provides a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfm
Policy Regarding Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting
The Companys policy regarding directors attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last years annual meeting of stockholders can be found on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfm.
8
PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board has selected KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008. The Company is submitting its selection of KPMG LLP for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. KPMG LLP has audited the Companys financial statements since 1998. The Company expects that representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Companys Bylaws do not require that the stockholders ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Company is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain KPMG LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Board and the Audit Committee in their discretion may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
During 2006 and 2007, fees for services provided by KPMG LLP were as follows:
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements and for the review of the financial statements included in the Companys quarterly reports on Form 10-Q totaled $1,495,047 and $1,506,074 in 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
The Company was not billed any fees for audit-related services in 2006 or 2007.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services totaled $87,438 and $111,910 in 2006 and 2007, respectively.
All Other Fees
There were no other fees billed by KPMG LLP for services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above, in 2006 and 2007.
The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of non-audit services by KPMG LLP was compatible with maintaining their independence.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance
9
with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During 2006 and 2007, all services provided by KPMG LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board
The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required for ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANYS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2008.
10
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 26, 2008 by (i) each stockholder that the Company knows is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director, (iii) each of the Named Executive Officers named in the Summary Executive Compensation table, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. The Company has relied upon information provided to the Company by its directors and Named Executive Officers and copies of documents sent to the Company that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by others for purposes of determining the number of shares each person beneficially owns. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes those persons who have voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of the Companys common stock beneficially owned by them. Shares of the Companys common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 26, 2008 are also deemed outstanding for purposes of calculating the percentage ownership of that person, and if applicable, the percentage ownership of the executive officers and directors as a group, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder listed in the table below is c/o Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, CA 95032.
Name and Address |
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
|||
Jay C. Hoag (1) 528 Ramona Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 |
14,633,382 | 23.75 | % | ||
Entities Related to Technology Crossover Ventures (2) 528 Ramona Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 |
14,577,411 | 23.69 | % | ||
LMM, LLC (3) 100 Light Street Baltimore, MD 21202 |
7,500,000 | 12.19 | % | ||
Davis Selected Advisors, L.P. (4) 2949 East Elvira Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85706 |
5,124,508 | 8.33 | % | ||
TCS Capital GP, LLC & Eric Semler (5) 888 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1504 New York, NY 10019 |
4,786,200 | 7.78 | % | ||
Reed Hastings (6) |
4,308,403 | 6.79 | % | ||
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, LP (7) 32 Old Slip New York, NY 10005 |
3,565,620 | 5.79 | % | ||
Barry McCarthy (8) |
704,096 | 1.13 | % | ||
Michael N. Schuh (9) 70 Willow Road, Suite 200 Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
529,129 | * |
11
Name and Address |
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
|||
Leslie Kilgore (10) |
335,033 | * | |||
Neil Hunt (11) |
278,023 | * | |||
Richard N. Barton (12) |
123,555 | * | |||
Ted Sarandos (13) |
96,239 | * | |||
A. George (Skip) Battle (14) |
85,971 | * | |||
Gregory S. Stanger (15) |
75,855 | * | |||
Timothy M. Haley (16) c/o Redpoint Ventures 3000 Sand Hill Road Building 2, Suite 290 Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
55,971 | * | |||
Patty McCord (17) |
29,792 | * | |||
Charles H. Giancarlo (18) |
19,717 | * | |||
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons) (19) |
21,275,166 | 32.68 | % |
* | Less than 1% of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock |
(1) | Includes options to purchase 55,971 shares held by Mr. Hoag. Mr. Hoag has the sole dispositive power over the options and the shares to be received upon exercise of such options and the sole voting power and sole investment control over the shares he receives upon exercise of the options. However, TCMI, Inc. holds 100% of the pecuniary interest in such options and the shares to be received upon exercise of such options. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares and options except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes shares held by TCV II (Q), L.P., TCV II Strategic Partners, L.P., Technology Crossover Ventures II, L.P., Technology Crossover Ventures II, C.V., TCV II, V.O.F., TCV IV, L.P., TCV IV Strategic Partners, L.P., TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, LP. (collectively, the TCV Entities). Please see footnote 2 for a discussion of the ownership of the TCV Entities. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the TCV Entities except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. |
(2) | All of the shares of the Companys common stock shown in the preceding table as beneficially owned by entities related to Technology Crossover Ventures are held of record by the TCV Entities. TCV II (Q), L.P. is the record holder of 538,321 of the Companys shares. TCV II Strategic Partners, L.P. is the record holder of 95,532 of the Companys shares. Technology Crossover Ventures II, L.P. is the record holder of 700,197 of the Companys shares. Technology Crossover Ventures II, C.V. is the record holder of 106,906 of the Companys shares. TCV II, V.O.F. is the record holder of 22,743 of the Companys shares. TCV IV, L.P. is the record holder of 10,143,932 of the Companys shares. TCV IV Strategic Partners, L.P. is the record holder of 378,255 of the Companys shares. Technology Crossover Management II, L.L.C. (TCM II) is the sole general partner of TCV II (Q), L.P., TCV II Strategic Partners, L.P. and Technology Crossover Ventures II, L.P. and the sole investment general partner of Technology Crossover Ventures II, C.V. and TCV II, V.O.F. TCM II has sole voting power and sole investment control over TCV II (Q), L.P., TCV II Strategic Partners, L.P., Technology Crossover Ventures II, L.P., Technology Crossover Ventures II, C.V. and TCV II, V.O.F. (collectively the TCV II Funds). Technology Crossover Management IV, L.L.C. (TCM IV) is the sole general partner of TCV IV, L.P. and TCV IV Strategic Partners, L.P. (collectively the TCV IV Funds) and has sole voting power and sole investment control over the TCV IV Funds. Mr. Hoag and Richard H. Kimball are Managing Members of TCM II and TCM IV and have shared voting power and sole investment control over the shares held by the TCV II Funds and TCV IV Funds. Mr. Hoag, Mr. Kimball, TCM II and TCM IV disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by the TCV II Funds and TCV IV Funds except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. |
TCV VI, L.P. is the record holder of 2,571,248 of the Companys shares. TCV Member Fund, L.P. is the record holder of 20,277 of the Companys shares. Technology Crossover Management VI, L.L.C. (TCM VI) is the general partner of TCV VI, L.P. and a general partner of TCV Member Fund, L.P. TCM VI has sole voting power and sole investment control over the shares held by the shares held by TCV VI, L.P. and TCV Member Fund, L.P. (collectively the TCV VI Funds). Jay C. Hoag, a director of the Company and a Class A Member of |
12
TCM VI, together with other Class A Members of TCM VI, Richard H. Kimball, John L. Drew, Jon Q. Reynolds, Jr., William J.G. Griffith IV and Robert W. Trudeau (collectively, the TCM Members), share voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the TCV VI Funds. TCM VI and the TCM Members disclaim beneficial ownership of any shares held by the TCV VI Funds except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests. |
(3) | As of December 31, 2007, based on information provided by LMM, LLC in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2008. |
(4) | As of December 31, 2007, based on information provided by Davis Selected Advisors, L.P. in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 12, 2008. |
(5) | As of December 31, 2007, based on information provided by TCS Capital GP, LLC & Eric Semler in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2008. |
(6) | Includes options to purchase 1,874,252 shares. Mr. Hastings is a trustee of the Hastings-Quillin Family Trust, which is the record holder of 2,434,151 of the Companys shares. |
(7) | As of December 31, 2007, based on information provided by Goldman Sachs Asset Management, LP in the Schedule 13G filed February 1, 2008. |
(8) | Includes: (i) options to purchase 642,386 shares; and (ii) 4,352 shares held by Mr. McCarthy as Trustee of the P. McCarthy Trust. Mr. McCarthy disclaims beneficial ownership of the 4,352 shares he holds as Trustee of the P. McCarthy Trust. |
(9) | Includes options to purchase 55,971 shares. Mr. Schuh is not the record holder of any of the Companys securities and disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares set forth next to his name except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Schuh is a trustee of the Michael N. and Mary G. Schuh 1990 Family Trust, which is the record holder of 50,096 of the Companys shares. Mr. Schuh is a General Partner of Foundation Capital Equity Partners II, L.P., which is the record holder of 1,010 of the Companys shares. Mr. Schuh is a Manager of FC Leadership Management Co., LLC and Foundation Capital Management Co., LLC. FC Leadership Management Co., LLC is not the record holder of any of the Companys securities. FC Leadership Management Co., LLC is the general partner of Foundation Capital Leadership Fund, LP and the sole manager of Foundation Capital Leadership Principals Fund, LLC. Foundation Capital Leadership Fund, LP is the record holder of 404,221 shares of the Companys common stock and Foundation Capital Leadership Principals Fund, LLC is the record holder of 10,779 shares of the Companys common stock. Foundation Capital Management Co., LLC is not the record holder of any of the Companys securities. Foundation Capital Management Co., LLC is the general partner of Foundation Capital, LP, which is the record holder of 2,432 of the Companys shares. |
(10) | Includes options to purchase 296,861 shares. |
(11) | Includes options to purchase 206,538 shares. |
(12) | Includes options to purchase 117,555 shares. |
(13) | Includes options to purchase 96,239 shares. |
(14) | Includes options to purchase 55,971 shares. |
(15) | Includes options to purchase 55,971 shares. |
(16) | Includes options to purchase 55,971 shares. |
(17) | Includes options to purchase 20,911 shares. |
(18) | Includes options to purchase 19,717 shares. |
(19) | Includes, without duplication, the shares and options listed in footnotes (1), (6) and (8) through (18) above. |
13
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Philosophy
The Companys compensation philosophy, which is the same for its Named Executive Officers and all other salaried employees, is premised on the Companys desire to attract and retain outstanding performers. As such, the Company aims to provide highly competitive compensation packages for all its key positions, including its Named Executive Officers. The Companys compensation practices are guided by market rates and tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual employee, rather than by seniority or overall Company performance. Individual compensation is nonetheless linked to Company performance by virtue of the stock options granted by the Company.
In addition, the Company believes that to attract and retain outstanding performers, it must provide a challenging work environment. To this end, the Company strives to maintain a high-performance culture; that is, an environment in which employees excel in articulated performance values. Below is a list of the Companys articulated performance values (including the explanations of those values provided to employees). The Company evaluates employee performance, including that of the Named Executive Officers, in light of these performance values.
1. Judgment
· | You make wise decisions (people, technical, business, and creative) despite ambiguity |
· | You identify root causes, and get beyond treating symptoms |
· | You think strategically, and can articulate what you are, and are not, trying to do |
· | You smartly separate what must be done well now, and what can be improved later |
2. Innovation
· | You re-conceptualize issues to discover practical solutions to hard problems |
· | You challenge prevailing assumptions when warranted, and suggest better approaches |
· | You create new ideas that prove useful |
· | You keep us nimble by minimizing complexity and finding time to simplify |
3. Impact
· | You accomplish amazing amounts of important work |
· | You demonstrate consistently strong performance so colleagues can rely upon you |
· | You focus on great results rather than on process |
· | You exhibit bias-to-action, and avoid analysis-paralysis |
4. Curiosity
· | You learn rapidly and eagerly |
· | You seek to understand our strategy, market, subscribers, and suppliers |
· | You are broadly knowledgeable about business, technology and entertainment |
· | You contribute effectively outside of your specialty |
5. Communication
· | You listen well, instead of reacting fast, so you can better understand |
· | You are concise and articulate in speech and writing |
· | You treat people with respect independent of their status or disagreement with you |
· | You maintain calm poise in stressful situations |
14
6. Courage
· | You say what you think even if it is controversial |
· | You make tough decisions without excessive agonizing |
· | You take smart risks |
· | You question actions inconsistent with our values |
7. Honesty
· | You are known for candor and directness |
· | You are non-political when you disagree with others |
· | You only say things about fellow employees you will say to their face |
· | You are quick to admit mistakes |
8. Selflessness
· | You seek what is best for Netflix, rather than best for yourself or your group |
· | You are ego-less when searching for the best ideas |
· | You make time to help colleagues |
· | You share information openly and proactively |
9. Passion
· | You inspire others with your thirst for excellence |
· | You care intensely about Netflix success |
· | You celebrate wins |
· | You are tenacious |
Determining Total Compensation
In determining the appropriate level of total compensation for its Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the performance of each Named Executive Officer in light of the Compensation philosophy outlined above. The Committee also evaluates comparative compensation data, which includes salary, equity and other compensation components from similarly situated companies. The Compensation Committee discusses, for each Named Executive Officer, the estimated amount of compensation:
(i) the Company would be willing pay to retain that person;
(ii) the Company would have to pay to replace the person; and,
(iii) the individual could otherwise command in the employment marketplace.
By evaluating the comparative compensation data in light of the foregoing factors, the Company believes it is better able to tailor its compensation determinations with the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual Named Executive Officer.
The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Talent Officer review the comparative data and discuss the factors listed above for each Named Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer then makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding total compensation for each Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee reviews and discusses the information and determines the total compensation for each Named Executive Officer as it deems appropriate. Total compensation is expressed in a dollar-denominated amount, but as described below, may be allocated between the two primary elements of the Companys compensation program, salary and stock options.
15
In 2007, comparative compensation data for helping estimate the three factors listed above for determining total compensation was primarily derived from Compensia, a management consulting firm providing executive compensation advisory services. The Compensation Committee retained Compensia to review the competitiveness of the Companys executive compensation program and to help the Committee in determining the total compensation for each Named Executive Officer. Compensia used two peer group companies for purposes of evaluating the Companys executive compensation. The first group consisted of consumer-oriented technology companies headquartered in the United States with annual revenues of generally between $500 million to $1.5 billion. Examples of this first group include, Earthlink, Monster Worldwide, and XM Satellite Radio. The second group consisted of technology companies located in the San Francisco-Bay Area with annual revenues of generally between $700 million to $1.5 billion. Examples of this second group include, JDS Uniphase, Novellus Systems and Sybase.
The Company does not specifically benchmark compensation for its Named Executive Officers in terms of picking a particular percentile relative to other people with similar titles at peer group companies The Company believes that many subjective factors unique to each Named Executive Officers responsibilities and performance are not adequately reflected or otherwise accounted for in a percentile-based compensation determination. Nonetheless, this comparative compensation data is valuable in that it provides the Company with insight into ranges and components of total compensation as well as confirms the reasonableness of the Companys own compensation decisions.
In previous years, comparative compensation data was collected primarily from the Radford Executive Survey produced by Radford Survey and Consulting as well as from a review by the Company of salary and other compensation information of named executive officers at similarly-situated technology, e-commerce, retail and entertainment companies.
The Chief Executive Officers total compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee in executive session without the presence of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committees decision regarding total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer is based on the philosophy outlined above as well as the review and data provided by Compensia. The accomplishments of the Chief Executive Officer in developing the business strategy for the Company, the performance of the Company relative to this strategy and his ability to attract and retain senior management are also considered.
The Companys compensation practices, including its performance values, are evaluated on an ongoing basis to determine whether they are appropriate to attract, retain and reward outstanding performers. Such evaluations may result in a refinement of the Companys articulation of its performance values or a determination that it is appropriate to adjust total compensation or otherwise modify the methods of granting equity incentives. Individual employee performance, including that of our Named Executive Officers, is also evaluated on an ongoing basis. To the extent such performance exceeds or falls short of the Companys performance values, the Company may take action that includes, in the case of star performers, promotions or increases in total compensation or, in the case of under performers, demotion, a reduction in total compensation or termination.
Elements of Total Compensation
After determining the total compensation amount for each Named Executive Officer by the method described above, the total compensation amount for each individual is divided into the two key elements of salary and stock options. This allocation is made pursuant to the compensation preferences of each Named Executive Officer who, within the parameters of the total compensation, can request a customized combination of salary and stock options. The Compensation Committee retains the authority to adjust these requests. With respect to compensation for 2008 and the previous two years, the Compensation Committee made no adjustments to the requested monthly stock option amounts. The amount of total compensation allocated to salary is considered cash compensation and paid through payroll during the year on a semi-monthly basis. The amount of total compensation allocated to stock options is referred to as the stock option allowance and while it is expressed in a
16
dollar denomination, it is merely used by the Company to calculate the number of stock options to be granted in the manner described below. The stock option allowance amount is not available to the employees as cash compensation, except in instances where severance payments are made and as otherwise set forth in the Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan described below.
The Company does not currently provide a program of performance bonuses for its Named Executive Officers. The Company expects all individuals to perform at a level deserving of a bonus and therefore such bonus amounts are taken into consideration in determining total compensation for the Companys employees.
In 2006, each employee, including the Named Executive Officers, who received stock options as part of his or her compensation package was required to allocate at least 5% of total compensation to stock options. Starting in 2007, all such employees could request any combination of salary and stock options, provided they were not able to receive more than 50% of their total compensation in stock options and the Company (or in the case of the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee) retained the right to adjust the requests or otherwise modify or eliminate the monthly stock option awards. By this method, each Named Executive Officer has the ability prior to the beginning of each calendar year to request his or her preferred mix of compensation elements within the parameters of total compensation. Once the allocation is requested, the Named Executive Officer generally may not make any adjustments or modifications during the calendar year.
After determining the amount of total compensation to be allocated to stock options, the Named Executive Officers receive monthly option grants pursuant to the Companys monthly option grant program. Under this program, the Named Executive Officers receive, on the first trading day of the month, fully vested options granted at fair market value as reflected by the closing price on the date of the option grant. The number of stock options to be granted monthly will fluctuate based on the fair market value on the date of the option grant. The actual number of options to be granted is determined by the following formula: the monthly dollar amount of the stock option allowance / ([fair market value on the date of option grant] * 0.25). This option granting practice is the same for Named Executive Officers and all other salaried employees. The Company established the foregoing formula in an effort to encourage stock ownership by employees. Under accounting valuation, the dollar value of stock options granted by the Company are appreciably higher than the dollar value of the Stock Option Allowance (please compare Summary Executive Compensation table provided in this Proxy Statement with the table listed below). While any valuation of options is inherently subjective, the Company believes that its formula for granting options when compared to the accounting valuation helps encourage stock ownership and therefore serves as an effective vehicle for helping align stockholder interests with the compensation of employees. Furthermore, because the stock options are granted at fair market value on the date of the option grant and are not generally transferable, they are only of value to the recipient through an increase in the market value of the Companys common stock, thereby linking that element of compensation to Company performance.
As shown in the table below, the Companys Named Executive Officers receive a significant portion of their total compensation in the form of stock options. The Company believes that equity ownership, including stock and stock options, helps align the interest of the Named Executive Officers with those of the Companys stockholders and is a good mechanism to link executive compensation to long-term company performance.
17
In 2007, the salary and stock option components for the Named Executive Officers were allocated as follows (please see the Summary Executive Compensation table provided in this Proxy Statement for a complete description of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers in 2007):
Name and Position |
2007 Annual Salary |
2007 Annual Stock Option Allowance |
2007 Monthly Stock Option Allowance | ||||||
Reed Hastings, Chief Executive Officer and |
$ | 850,000 | $ | 850,000 | $ | 70,833 | |||
Barry McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer |
699,600 | 620,400 | 51,700 | ||||||
Leslie Kilgore, Chief Marketing Officer |
700,000 | 700,000 | 58,333 | ||||||
Neil Hunt, Chief Product Officer |
670,000 | 330,000 | 27,500 | ||||||
Ted Sarandos, Chief Content Officer |
810,000 | 90,000 | 7,500 |
In 2008, the salary and stock option components for the Named Executive Officers are being allocated as follows:
Name and Position |
2008 Annual Salary |
2008 Annual Stock Option Allowance |
2008 Monthly Stock Option Allowance | ||||||
Reed Hastings, Chief Executive Officer and |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 83,333 | |||
Barry McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer |
800,000 | 600,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Leslie Kilgore, Chief Marketing Officer |
750,000 | 750,000 | 62,500 | ||||||
Neil Hunt, Chief Product Officer |
800,000 | 400,000 | 33,333 | ||||||
Ted Sarandos, Chief Content Officer |
900,000 | 100,000 | 8,333 |
Vested stock options granted before June 30, 2004 can be exercised up to three (3) months following termination of employment. Vested stock options granted after June 30, 2004 and before January 1, 2007 can be exercised up to one (1) year following termination of employment. Vested stock options granted on or after January 1, 2007 can be exercised up to ten (10) years following grant regardless of employment status. The Company believes that this increase in the life of the options enhances the value of such options for each employee and thereby encourages equity ownership in the Company which is helpful in aligning the interests of employees with that of the Company. The Company does not believe that staggered vesting of stock options or early expiration of options following termination has a material impact on retention. The Company believes that creating a high-performance culture and providing highly competitive compensation packages are the critical components for retaining employees, including its Named Executive Officers.
The Company utilizes salary and stock options as its key compensation components in order to be competitive within the marketplace. Similarly situated companies typically offer executive officers an equity component as part of their overall compensation and as such, the Company believes it is important to provide this opportunity to its employees, including the Named Executive Officers. By permitting employees to request a customized combination of salary and stock options, the Company believes it is better able to take into
18
consideration personal compensation preferences and thereby offer a more compelling total compensation package. In addition, offering grants monthly provides employees with a dollar-cost averaging approach to the price of their option grants. Option grants made on an infrequent basis are more susceptible to the whims of market timing and fluctuations. By granting options each month, the Company believes it alleviates to a great extent the arbitrariness of option timing and the potential negative employee issues associated with underwater options.
In addition to salary and stock options, Named Executive Officers also have the opportunity to participate in the Companys 401(k) matching program which enables them to receive a dollar-for-dollar Company match of up to 3% of his or her compensation to the 401(k) fund. Each of the Named Executive Officers except for the Chief Executive Officer participated in this program in 2007 and therefore the Company matched the 401(k) contributions as shown in the tables of this Proxy Statement.
The Company also offers employees, including Named Executive Officers, the opportunity to participate in the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Program (ESPP). Each of the Named Executive Officers, except for the Chief Executive Officer, participated in this program in 2007. Under the Companys ESPP, employees may purchase common stock of the Company through accumulated payroll deductions. The purchase price of the common stock acquired by employees participating in the ESPP is 85% of the closing price on either the first day of the offering period or the last day of the purchase period, whichever is lower. Through May 1, 2006, offering periods were twenty-four months, and the purchase periods were six months. Therefore, each offering period included four six-month purchase periods, and the purchase price for each six-month period was determined by comparing the closing prices on the first day of the offering period and the last day of the applicable purchase period. In this manner, the look-back for determining the purchase price was up to twenty-four months. However, effective May 1, 2006, the ESPP was amended so that the offering and purchase periods take place concurrently in consecutive six month increments. Under the amended ESPP, therefore, the look-back for determining the purchase price is six months.
The Company also maintains a group term life insurance policy for all full-time employees, and a portion of the taxable amounts attributable to each Named Executive Officer is shown in the tables in this Proxy Statement.
Termination-Based Compensation
The Named Executive Officers are beneficiaries of the Companys Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan. Under this plan, each employee of the Company at the level of Vice President or higher is entitled to a severance benefit upon termination of employment (other than for cause, death or permanent disability) so long as he or she signs a waiver and release of claims and an agreement not to disparage the Company, its directors or its officers in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company. The severance benefit consists of a lump sum cash payment equal to nine (9) months of base pay and nine (9) months of the cash equivalent to the stock option allowance then being used in calculating the number of options granted monthly to such employee. The right to receive a severance benefit terminates upon a change in control transaction, so that the beneficiaries of the plan are not entitled to both a change in control benefit as well as a severance benefit.
In lieu of the severance benefit, employees covered by the plan who are employed by the Company on the date of a change in control transaction are entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve (12) months of base pay and twelve (12) months of the cash equivalent to the stock option allowance then being used in calculating the number of options granted monthly to such employee. Furthermore, the Company determined that it was appropriate to make such payment upon the single-trigger event of a change in control in order to reduce distractions associated with the uncertainty surrounding change in control transactions and to lessen potential conflicts that might otherwise arise when a Company executive must rely on the decisions of the acquiring company for either continued employment or severance.
19
The benefits owing under the plan are to be paid to the beneficiary by the Company as soon as administratively practicable following the completion of all conditions to the payment, but in no event more than two and one half months following the date of the triggering event. The Company believes that benefits under the Companys Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan are consistent with similar benefits offered to executive officers of similarly situated companies and moreover, the Plan is an important element in advancing the Companys overall compensation philosophy of attracting and retaining outstanding performers. Each of the terms base pay, cause and change in control are defined in the plan, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2005.
Tax Considerations
The Compensation Committee considered the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code on executive officer compensation. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation that we pay to our Chief Executive Officer or any of the next three most highly compensated executive officers to the extent that the compensation for any such individual exceeds $1 million in any taxable year. However, this deduction limitation does not apply to compensation that is performance-based under 162(m). The Company believes that stock options granted to its executive officers will meet the requirement of being performance-based under Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Committee concluded that Section 162(m) should not materially reduce the tax deductions available to the Company. However, the Committee may from time to time approve compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) if it determines that it is in the Companys best interest to do so.
20
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER MATTERS
Summary Executive Compensation
The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid by the Company to: (i) the Chief Executive Officer (the Companys principal executive officer), (ii) the Chief Financial Officer (the Companys principal financial officer), and (iii) the Companys other named executive officers listed below. We refer to the individuals listed in the table below as the Named Executive Officers throughout this Proxy Statement. A description of the method for determining the amount of salary in proportion to total compensation is set forth above in Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Option Award ($) (1) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total Compensation ($) |
||||||||||
Reed Hastings |
2007 | $ | 850,000 | $ | 1,568,307 | $ | 270 | $ | 2,418,577 | (2) | |||||
Chief Executive Officer, |
2006 | 500,000 | 1,802,842 | 270 | 2,303,112 | (2) | |||||||||
Barry McCarthy |
2007 | 699,600 | 1,144,650 | 7,164 | 1,851,414 | (3) | |||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
2006 | 500,000 | 1,255,936 | 7,914 | 1,763,850 | (4) | |||||||||
Leslie Kilgore |
2007 | 700,000 | 1,291,555 | 6,930 | 1,998,485 | (5) | |||||||||
Chief Marketing Officer |
2006 | 650,000 | 987,864 | 15,180 | 1,653,044 | (6) | |||||||||
Neil Hunt |
2007 | 670,000 | 608,872 | 7,020 | 1,285,892 | (7) | |||||||||
Chief Product Officer |
|||||||||||||||
Ted Sarandos |
2007 | 810,000 | 166,053 | 13,430 | 989,483 | (8) | |||||||||
Chief Content Officer |
(1) | Dollar amounts in the Option Awards column reflect the compensation expense recognized by the Company for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to stock options during the 2007 fiscal year in accordance with SFAS 123R. The dollar amounts set forth in the Option Awards column are different than the stock option allowance amounts described in the section above entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis because the stock option allowance amounts are reflective of the total compensation amount attributable to stock option grants, not the accounting valuation under SFAS 123R. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 7 to the Companys consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and the discussion under Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsStock-Based Compensation in the Companys Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2008. |
(2) | Includes taxable amounts attributable to the employee under our group term life insurance policy. |
(3) | Includes $6,750 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $414 for taxable amounts attributable to Mr. McCarthy under our group term life insurance policy. |
(4) | Includes $7,500 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $414 for taxable amounts attributable to Mr. McCarthy under our group term life insurance policy. |
(5) | Includes $6,750 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $180 for taxable amounts attributable to Ms. Kilgore under our group term life insurance policy. |
(6) | Includes $15,000 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $180 for taxable amounts attributable to Ms. Kilgore under our group term life insurance policy. |
(7) | Includes $6,750 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $270 for taxable amounts attributable to Mr. Hunt under our group term life insurance policy. |
(8) | Includes $6,750 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan, $180 for taxable amounts attributable to Mr. Sarandos under our group term life insurance policy, and $6,500 auto allowance. |
21
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of awards made to the Named Executive Officers during 2007. As described above in Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Company grants employees, including the Named Executive Officers, fully vested stock options on a monthly basis. These are the only awards made to the Named Executive Officers. The material terms of these grants, including the formula for determining the number of stock options to be granted, are set forth above in Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Name |
Grant Date |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards | ||||||
Hastings, Reed |
01/03/07 | 10,652 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 130,402.85 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
02/01/07 | 12,471 | $ | 22.73 | $ | 130,410.49 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
03/01/07 | 12,405 | $ | 22.83 | $ | 130,290.96 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
04/02/07 | 12,067 | $ | 23.48 | $ | 126,418.72 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
05/01/07 | 12,786 | $ | 22.15 | $ | 126,364.04 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
06/01/07 | 13,142 | $ | 21.57 | $ | 126,481.24 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
07/02/07 | 14,545 | $ | 19.48 | $ | 131,873.70 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
08/01/07 | 16,511 | $ | 17.16 | $ | 131,870.05 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
09/04/07 | 15,602 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 131,727.69 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
10/01/07 | 13,340 | $ | 21.22 | $ | 134,095.01 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
11/01/07 | 10,781 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 134,264.42 | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
12/03/07 | 11,905 | $ | 23.78 | $ | 134,107.44 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
01/03/07 | 4,135 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 50,621.08 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
02/01/07 | 4,842 | $ | 22.73 | $ | 50,633.28 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
03/01/07 | 4,816 | $ | 22.83 | $ | 50,582.93 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
04/02/07 | 4,685 | $ | 23.48 | $ | 49,081.93 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
05/01/07 | 4,964 | $ | 22.15 | $ | 49,059.21 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
06/01/07 | 5,102 | $ | 21.57 | $ | 49,102.67 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
07/02/07 | 5,647 | $ | 19.48 | $ | 51,199.09 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
08/01/07 | 6,410 | $ | 17.16 | $ | 51,195.39 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
09/04/07 | 6,057 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 51,139.25 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
10/01/07 | 5,179 | $ | 21.22 | $ | 52,059.83 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
11/01/07 | 4,186 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 52,131.61 | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
12/03/07 | 4,622 | $ | 23.78 | $ | 52,065.91 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
01/03/07 | 8,772 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 107,387.70 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
02/01/07 | 10,270 | $ | 22.73 | $ | 107,394.42 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
03/01/07 | 10,216 | $ | 22.83 | $ | 107,299.67 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
04/02/07 | 9,938 | $ | 23.48 | $ | 104,114.46 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
05/01/07 | 10,529 | $ | 22.15 | $ | 104,058.11 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
06/01/07 | 10,823 | $ | 21.57 | $ | 104,162.72 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
07/02/07 | 11,978 | $ | 19.48 | $ | 108,599.73 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
08/01/07 | 13,598 | $ | 17.16 | $ | 108,604.51 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
09/04/07 | 12,849 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 108,484.11 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10/01/07 | 10,986 | $ | 21.22 | $ | 110,432.37 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
11/01/07 | 8,879 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 110,577.29 | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
12/03/07 | 9,804 | $ | 23.78 | $ | 110,440.10 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
01/03/07 | 7,774 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 95,170.09 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
02/01/07 | 9,102 | $ | 22.73 | $ | 95,180.52 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
03/01/07 | 9,054 | $ | 22.83 | $ | 95,095.07 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
04/02/07 | 8,807 | $ | 23.48 | $ | 92,265.65 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
05/01/07 | 9,332 | $ | 22.15 | $ | 92,228.16 |
22
Name |
Grant Date |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards | ||||||
McCarthy, Barry |
06/01/07 | 9,592 | $ | 21.57 | $ | 92,315.33 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
07/02/07 | 10,616 | $ | 19.48 | $ | 96,251.03 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
08/01/07 | 12,051 | $ | 17.16 | $ | 96,248.93 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
09/04/07 | 11,388 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 96,148.88 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
10/01/07 | 9,736 | $ | 21.22 | $ | 97,867.25 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
11/01/07 | 7,869 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 97,998.95 | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
12/03/07 | 8,689 | $ | 23.78 | $ | 97,879.85 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
01/03/07 | 1,128 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 13,809.09 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
02/01/07 | 1,320 | $ | 22.73 | $ | 13,803.37 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
03/01/07 | 1,313 | $ | 22.83 | $ | 13,790.57 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
04/02/07 | 1,278 | $ | 23.48 | $ | 13,388.84 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
05/01/07 | 1,354 | $ | 22.15 | $ | 13,381.58 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
06/01/07 | 1,391 | $ | 21.57 | $ | 13,387.26 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
07/02/07 | 1,540 | $ | 19.48 | $ | 13,962.56 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
08/01/07 | 1,748 | $ | 17.16 | $ | 13,960.93 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
09/04/07 | 1,652 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 13,947.84 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
10/01/07 | 1,412 | $ | 21.22 | $ | 14,193.57 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
11/01/07 | 1,142 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 14,222.24 | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
12/03/07 | 1,261 | $ | 23.78 | $ | 14,204.91 |
Outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2007
The following table sets forth information concerning equity awards for each Named Executive Officer that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2007.
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
657,500 | $ | 1.50 | 7/18/2011 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
200,000 | $ | 1.50 | 2/27/2012 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 12.38 | 7/1/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 12.48 | 8/1/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 16.83 | 9/2/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 17.26 | 10/1/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 29.23 | 11/3/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 25.35 | 12/1/2013 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 27.42 | 1/2/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 36.37 | 2/2/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 34.75 | 3/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 35.36 | 4/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 26.90 | 5/3/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,238 | $ | 32.60 | 6/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,977 | $ | 35.95 | 7/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
23,148 | $ | 20.16 | 8/2/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
32,680 | $ | 14.27 | 9/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
28,595 | $ | 16.33 | 10/1/2014 |
23
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
Hastings, Reed |
49,435 | $ | 9.43 | 11/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
41,518 | $ | 11.25 | 12/1/2014 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
39,150 | $ | 11.92 | 1/3/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
40,650 | $ | 11.48 | 2/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
43,210 | $ | 10.79 | 3/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
43,050 | $ | 10.83 | 4/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
40,369 | $ | 11.57 | 5/2/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
32,140 | $ | 14.50 | 6/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
20,129 | $ | 16.55 | 7/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
17,218 | $ | 19.34 | 8/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,547 | $ | 21.45 | 9/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,513 | $ | 26.64 | 10/3/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,980 | $ | 25.68 | 11/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,291 | $ | 27.11 | 12/1/2015 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,801 | $ | 26.05 | 1/3/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,291 | $ | 27.11 | 2/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,419 | $ | 26.85 | 3/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
11,854 | $ | 28.13 | 4/3/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
11,261 | $ | 29.60 | 5/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
11,688 | $ | 28.51 | 6/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,237 | $ | 27.24 | 7/3/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
16,244 | $ | 20.50 | 8/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
16,633 | $ | 20.02 | 9/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
14,620 | $ | 22.81 | 10/2/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,095 | $ | 27.55 | 11/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
11,307 | $ | 29.46 | 12/1/2016 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
10,652 | $ | 26.61 | 1/3/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,471 | $ | 22.73 | 2/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,405 | $ | 22.83 | 3/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,067 | $ | 23.48 | 4/2/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
12,786 | $ | 22.15 | 5/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
13,142 | $ | 21.57 | 6/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
14,545 | $ | 19.48 | 7/2/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
16,511 | $ | 17.16 | 8/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
15,602 | $ | 18.14 | 9/4/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
13,340 | $ | 21.22 | 10/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
10,781 | $ | 26.29 | 11/1/2017 | |||
Hastings, Reed |
11,905 | $ | 23.78 | 12/3/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
1,332 | $ | 1.50 | 1/24/2011 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
19,912 | $ | 1.50 | 2/27/2012 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 29.23 | 11/3/2013 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 25.35 | 12/1/2013 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 27.42 | 1/2/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 36.37 | 2/2/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 34.75 | 3/1/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 35.36 | 4/1/2014 |
24
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 26.90 | 5/3/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,000 | $ | 32.60 | 6/1/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
2,317 | $ | 35.95 | 7/1/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,134 | $ | 20.16 | 8/2/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,106 | $ | 16.33 | 10/1/2014 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,680 | $ | 14.50 | 6/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,535 | $ | 16.55 | 7/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,735 | $ | 19.34 | 8/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,275 | $ | 21.45 | 9/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,441 | $ | 26.64 | 10/3/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,570 | $ | 25.68 | 11/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,380 | $ | 27.11 | 12/1/2015 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,520 | $ | 26.05 | 1/3/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,380 | $ | 27.11 | 2/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,415 | $ | 26.85 | 3/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,260 | $ | 28.13 | 4/3/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,097 | $ | 29.60 | 5/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,214 | $ | 28.51 | 6/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,365 | $ | 27.24 | 7/3/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,467 | $ | 20.50 | 8/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,574 | $ | 20.02 | 9/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,020 | $ | 22.81 | 10/2/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,326 | $ | 27.55 | 11/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
3,109 | $ | 29.46 | 12/1/2016 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,135 | $ | 26.61 | 1/3/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,842 | $ | 22.73 | 2/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,816 | $ | 22.83 | 3/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,685 | $ | 23.48 | 4/2/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,964 | $ | 22.15 | 5/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,102 | $ | 21.57 | 6/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,647 | $ | 19.48 | 7/2/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
6,410 | $ | 17.16 | 8/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
6,057 | $ | 18.14 | 9/4/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
5,179 | $ | 21.22 | 10/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,186 | $ | 26.29 | 11/1/2017 | |||
Hunt, Neil |
4,622 | $ | 23.78 | 12/3/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
46,028 | $ | 1.50 | 2/27/2012 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 29.23 | 11/3/2013 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 25.35 | 12/1/2013 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 27.42 | 1/2/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 36.37 | 2/2/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 34.75 | 3/1/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 35.36 | 4/1/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 26.90 | 5/3/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,762 | $ | 32.60 | 6/1/2014 |
25
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
Kilgore, Leslie |
4,635 | $ | 35.95 | 7/1/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,267 | $ | 20.16 | 8/2/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,212 | $ | 16.33 | 10/1/2014 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
11,071 | $ | 16.55 | 7/1/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
9,470 | $ | 19.34 | 8/1/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,551 | $ | 21.45 | 9/1/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,882 | $ | 26.64 | 10/3/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
7,139 | $ | 25.68 | 11/1/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,760 | $ | 27.11 | 12/1/2015 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
7,040 | $ | 26.05 | 1/3/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,760 | $ | 27.11 | 2/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,831 | $ | 26.85 | 3/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,520 | $ | 28.13 | 4/3/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,194 | $ | 29.60 | 5/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,428 | $ | 28.51 | 6/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,730 | $ | 27.24 | 7/3/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,934 | $ | 20.50 | 8/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
9,148 | $ | 20.02 | 9/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,041 | $ | 22.81 | 10/2/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,652 | $ | 27.55 | 11/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
6,219 | $ | 29.46 | 12/1/2016 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,772 | $ | 26.61 | 1/3/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,270 | $ | 22.73 | 2/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,216 | $ | 22.83 | 3/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
9,938 | $ | 23.48 | 4/2/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,529 | $ | 22.15 | 5/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,823 | $ | 21.57 | 6/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
11,978 | $ | 19.48 | 7/2/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
13,598 | $ | 17.16 | 8/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
12,849 | $ | 18.14 | 9/4/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
10,986 | $ | 21.22 | 10/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
8,879 | $ | 26.29 | 11/1/2017 | |||
Kilgore, Leslie |
9,804 | $ | 23.78 | 12/3/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
65,168 | $ | 1.50 | 2/27/2012 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 12.38 | 7/1/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 12.48 | 8/1/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 16.83 | 9/2/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 17.26 | 10/1/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 29.23 | 11/3/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 25.35 | 12/1/2013 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 27.42 | 1/2/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 36.37 | 2/2/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 34.75 | 3/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 35.36 | 4/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 26.90 | 5/3/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,334 | $ | 32.60 | 6/1/2014 |
26
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
McCarthy, Barry |
5,098 | $ | 35.95 | 7/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,094 | $ | 20.16 | 8/2/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
12,838 | $ | 14.27 | 9/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
11,234 | $ | 16.33 | 10/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
19,421 | $ | 9.43 | 11/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
16,311 | $ | 11.25 | 12/1/2014 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
15,380 | $ | 11.92 | 1/3/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
15,970 | $ | 11.48 | 2/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
15,955 | $ | 10.79 | 3/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
16,913 | $ | 10.83 | 4/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
15,859 | $ | 11.57 | 5/2/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
12,626 | $ | 14.50 | 6/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
15,097 | $ | 16.55 | 7/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
12,913 | $ | 19.34 | 8/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
11,660 | $ | 21.45 | 9/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,384 | $ | 26.64 | 10/3/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,735 | $ | 25.68 | 11/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,218 | $ | 27.11 | 12/1/2015 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,961 | $ | 26.05 | 1/3/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,604 | $ | 27.11 | 2/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,693 | $ | 26.85 | 3/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,298 | $ | 28.13 | 4/3/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
7,883 | $ | 29.60 | 5/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,181 | $ | 28.51 | 6/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,566 | $ | 27.24 | 7/3/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
11,371 | $ | 20.50 | 8/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
11,643 | $ | 20.02 | 9/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
10,234 | $ | 22.81 | 10/2/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,466 | $ | 27.55 | 11/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
7,915 | $ | 29.46 | 12/1/2016 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
7,774 | $ | 26.61 | 1/3/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,102 | $ | 22.73 | 2/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,054 | $ | 22.83 | 3/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,807 | $ | 23.48 | 4/2/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,332 | $ | 22.15 | 5/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,592 | $ | 21.57 | 6/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
10,616 | $ | 19.48 | 7/2/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
12,051 | $ | 17.16 | 8/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
11,388 | $ | 18.14 | 9/4/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
9,736 | $ | 21.22 | 10/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
7,869 | $ | 26.29 | 11/1/2017 | |||
McCarthy, Barry |
8,689 | $ | 23.78 | 12/3/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
25,580 | $ | 1.50 | 2/27/2012 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 29.23 | 11/3/2013 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 25.35 | 12/1/2013 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 27.42 | 1/2/2014 |
27
Option Awards | |||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date | ||||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 36.37 | 2/2/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 34.75 | 3/1/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 35.36 | 4/1/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 26.90 | 5/3/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
4,524 | $ | 32.60 | 6/1/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,390 | $ | 35.95 | 7/1/2014 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,924 | $ | 21.45 | 9/1/2015 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,548 | $ | 26.64 | 10/3/2015 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,606 | $ | 25.68 | 11/1/2015 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,521 | $ | 27.11 | 12/1/2015 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
528 | $ | 26.05 | 1/3/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
507 | $ | 27.11 | 2/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
512 | $ | 26.85 | 3/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
489 | $ | 28.13 | 4/3/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
465 | $ | 29.60 | 5/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
482 | $ | 28.51 | 6/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
505 | $ | 27.24 | 7/3/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
670 | $ | 20.50 | 8/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
686 | $ | 20.02 | 9/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
603 | $ | 22.81 | 10/2/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
499 | $ | 27.55 | 11/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
466 | $ | 29.46 | 12/1/2016 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,128 | $ | 26.61 | 1/3/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,320 | $ | 22.73 | 2/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,313 | $ | 22.83 | 3/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,278 | $ | 23.48 | 4/2/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,354 | $ | 22.15 | 5/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,391 | $ | 21.57 | 6/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,540 | $ | 19.48 | 7/2/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,748 | $ | 17.16 | 8/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,652 | $ | 18.14 | 9/4/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,412 | $ | 21.22 | 10/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,142 | $ | 26.29 | 11/1/2017 | |||
Sarandos, Ted |
1,261 | $ | 23.78 | 12/3/2017 |
28
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information concerning each exercise of stock options during 2007 for each of the Named Executive Officers on an aggregated basis.
Option Awards | |||||
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1) | |||
Reed Hastings |
130,000 | $ | 2,651,909 | ||
Barry McCarthy |
71,800 | $ | 1,733,690 | ||
Leslie Kilgore |
218,405 | $ | 3,250,321 | ||
Neil Hunt |
2,000 | $ | 28,020 | ||
Ted Sarandos |
0 | $ | 0 |
(1) | Dollar value realized on exercise equals the difference between the closing price on the date of exercise date less the exercise price of the option and does not necessarily reflect the sales price of the shares or if a sale was made. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The Named Executive Officers are beneficiaries of the Companys Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan, as described in more detail above in Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The information below reflects the estimated value of the compensation to be paid by the Company to each of the Named Executive Officers in the event of termination or a change in control under the terms of the Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan. The amounts shown below assume that termination or change in control was effective as of December 31, 2007. The actual amounts that would be paid can only be determined at the time of the actual triggering event. The right to receive a severance benefit terminates upon a change in control transaction, so that the beneficiaries of the plan are not entitled to both a change in control benefit as well as a severance benefit.
Name |
Severance Benefit |
Change in Control Benefit | ||||
Reed Hastings |
$ | 1,500,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | ||
Barry McCarthy |
1,050,000 | 1,400,000 | ||||
Leslie Kilgore |
1,125,000 | 1,500,000 | ||||
Neil Hunt |
900,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||
Ted Sarandos |
750,000 | 1,000,000 |
29
Compensation of Directors
The Companys directors do not currently receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee Director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee Director of the Company in consideration for services provided to the Company and subject to the terms and conditions of the Companys 2002 Stock Plan. The actual number of options to be granted is determined by the following formula: $10,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.25). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Mr. Barton received options to purchase 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock upon joining the Board in May 2002, but no other current director was granted options upon joining the Board other than the regular monthly grants.
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Companys non-employee directors during 2007.
Names |
Option Awards ($) (1) |
Total ($) |
|||||
Richard N. Barton |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (2) | ||
A. George (Skip) Battle |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (3) | ||
Charles H. Giancarlo |
$ | 148,342 | $ | 148,342 | (4) | ||
Timothy M. Haley |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (5) | ||
Jay C. Hoag |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (6) | ||
Michael N. Schuh |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (7) | ||
Gregory S. Stanger |
$ | 221,411 | $ | 221,411 | (8) |
(1) | Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values, computed in accordance with SFAS 123R, as shown below. |
Grant Date |
Fair Value ($) | |
01/03/07 |
18,412 | |
02/01/07 |
18,415 | |
03/01/07 |
18,391 | |
04/02/07 |
17,852 | |
05/01/07 |
17,839 | |
06/01/07 |
17,853 | |
07/02/07 |
18,614 | |
08/01/07 |
18,617 | |
09/04/07 |
18,600 | |
10/01/07 |
18,928 | |
11/01/07 |
18,955 | |
12/03/07 |
18,936 |
(2) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at 12/31/07 is 113,171. |
(3) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Battle at 12/31/07 is 51,587. |
(4) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Giancarlo at 12/31/07 is 15,333. |
(5) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at 12/31/07 is 51,587. |
(6) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at 12/31/07 is 51,587. |
(7) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Schuh at 12/31/07 is 51,587. |
(8) | Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Stanger at 12/31/07 is 51,587. |
30
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes the Companys equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007:
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
||||||
Plan category |
(a) |
(b) |
(c) (1) |
|||||
Equity compensation plans or arrangements approved by security holders |
4,762,138 | $ | 19.17 | 6,625,797 | (2)(3) | |||
Equity compensation plans or arrangements not approved by security holders |
857,500 | $ | 1.50 | | (4) | |||
Total |
5,619,638 | $ | 16.47 | 6,625,797 | ||||
(1) | Excludes securities reflected in column entitled Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights. |
(2) | Includes 2,630,931 shares of the Companys common stock reserved under its 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, for future issuance. |
(3) | The Companys 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for annual increases in the number of shares available for issuance on the first day of each year equal to the lesser of: (i) 666,666 shares, (ii) 2% of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock on such date, or (iii) such other amount as determined by the Board. |
(4) | Reflects two grants of stock options made, respectively, on July 18, 2001 and February 27, 2002, to Reed Hastings, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, exercisable for shares of the Companys common stock pursuant to Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreements. Options are currently fully vested and are exercisable, at a price of $1.50 (adjusted for stock splits), until the earlier of three months following termination of service or ten years from the grant date. The Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreements are filed as Exhibits 10.6 and 10.7, respectively, to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2002. |
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for its directors, officers and other employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Companys Investor Relations Web site at http://ir.netflix.com/documentdisplay.cfm. Any waivers of the Code of Ethics will be posted at that Web site.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Companys common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.
To the Companys knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during fiscal year 2007 all of the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Companys officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders were followed in a timely manner.
31
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors |
Timothy M. Haley |
Jay C. Hoag |
A. George (Skip) Battle |
32
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Audit Committee engages and supervises the Companys independent registered public accounting firm and oversees the Companys financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 with management, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed with KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Companys audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, its judgments as to the quality of the Companys accounting principles and the other matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including the matters required by the Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence from management and the Company, including the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with the Audit Committees.
The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees paid to KPMG LLP during the year ended December 31, 2007 for audit and non-audit services, which fees are described under the heading Principal Accountant Fees and Services. The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of all non-audit services by KPMG LLP were compatible with maintaining its independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG LLP the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with KPMG LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee and the Board have also recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of KPMG LLP to audit the Companys financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2008.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors |
Timothy M. Haley |
Michael N. Schuh |
Gregory S. Stanger |
33
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Agreements with Directors and Executive Officers
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with the Company.
Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions
The Company has a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the related party may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction. No related party transactions were identified in 2007.
34
STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS
Stockholders sharing an address with another stockholder may receive only one set of proxy materials at that address unless they have provided contrary instructions. Any such stockholder who wishes to receive a separate set of proxy materials now or in the future may write or call the Company to request a separate copy of these materials from:
Investor Relations
Netflix, Inc.
100 Winchester Circle
Los Gatos, CA 95032
(408) 540-3700
The Company will promptly, upon written or oral request, deliver a separate copy of its annual report or this Proxy Statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which only a single copy was delivered.
Similarly, stockholders sharing an address with another stockholder who have received multiple copies of the Companys proxy materials may write or call the above address and phone number to request delivery of a single copy of these materials in the future.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
David Hyman |
General Counsel and Secretary |
April 2, 2008
Los Gatos, California
35
FORM OF PROXY
NETFLIX, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MAY 21, 2008
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder of Netflix, Inc. (the Company) hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated April 2, 2008, and hereby appoints Reed Hastings and Barry McCarthy, and each of them, with full power of substitution, as Proxy or Proxies to vote all shares of the Companys common stock of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Netflix, Inc. to be held on May 21, 2008, and at any adjournments thereof, upon the proposals set forth in this and described in the Proxy Statement, and in their discretion with respect to such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
If this proxy is properly executed and returned, this proxy will be voted for the specifications made below or if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted for each nominee for Class III director set forth below (item 1), and for ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 (item 2).
Either of such Proxies or substitutes shall have and may exercise all of the powers of said Proxies hereunder.
1. | To elect three Class III directors to hold office until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: |
Reed Hastings
¨ | FOR | ¨ | WITHHELD |
Jay C. Hoag
¨ | FOR | ¨ | WITHHELD |
A. George (Skip) Battle
¨ | FOR | ¨ | WITHHELD |
2. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008. |
¨ | FOR | ¨ | AGAINST | ¨ | WITHHELD |
Mark box at right if an address change or comment has been noted on this card ¨
This Proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the stockholder or stockholders exactly as the stockholders or stockholders names appear hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary or representative capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants, as community property or otherwise by more than one person, all should sign.
Signature: |
|
Date: |
|
Signature: |
|
Date: |
|