UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

SEAWORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400

Orlando, Florida 32819

April 25, 2018

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. For your convenience, we are pleased that the Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting via a live audio webcast by visiting seaworld.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.

As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are also pleased to be furnishing our proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the Internet. We believe this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of the materials, lowers the costs of the Annual Meeting and conserves natural resources. We sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 25, 2018 to our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2018. The notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report and vote online. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials from us instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice.

Your vote is important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we strongly urge you to cast your vote promptly. You may vote over the Internet, as well as by telephone or by mail. Please review the instructions on the proxy or voting instruction card regarding each of these voting options.

Thank you for your continued support of SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc.

Sincerely,

Yoshikazu Maruyama

Executive Chairperson of the Board of Directors

John T. Reilly

Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Parks

Operations Officer

9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400

Orlando, Florida 32819

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 13, 2018

Notice is hereby given that the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, by visiting seaworld.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. You will need to have your 16-Digit Control Number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to join the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2018, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held at that time.

You have three options for submitting your vote before the Annual Meeting:

Please vote as soon as possible to record your vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018: The Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

G. Anthony (Tony) Taylor

Corporate Secretary

April 25, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400

Orlando, Florida 32819

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 13, 2018

GENERAL INFORMATION

Why am I being provided with these materials?

We have made these proxy materials available to you via the Internet or, upon your request, have delivered printed versions of these proxy materials to you by mail in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) of SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 13, 2018 (“Annual Meeting”), and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Directors, officers and other Company employees also may solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares via the Internet in accordance with the instructions at seaworld.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.

What am I voting on?

There are three proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

Who is entitled to vote?

Stockholders as of the close of business on April 17, 2018 (the “Record Date”) may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of that date, there were 88,548,991 shares of common stock outstanding. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you as of the Record Date, including shares:

1

What constitutes a quorum?

The holders of record of a majority of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by “broker non-votes” also are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. However, as described below under “How are votes counted?”, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote (a “broker non-vote”).

What is a “broker non-vote”?

A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker are not voted with respect to a proposal because (1) the broker has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares and (2) the broker lacks the authority to vote the shares at his/her discretion. Under current New York Stock Exchange interpretations that govern broker non-votes, each of the Nominee Proposal and Say-on-Pay Proposal are considered non-discretionary matters and a broker will lack the authority to vote shares at his/her discretion on such proposals. The Ratification Proposal is considered a discretionary matter and a broker will be permitted to exercise his/her discretion.

How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

With respect to the election of the Nominee Proposal, each director is elected at the Annual Meeting by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to such director’s election, which means that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election. If any incumbent director nominee fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, our bylaws require that such person offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board and that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject such resignation or whether other action should be taken.

With respect to the Ratification Proposal and the Say-on-Pay Proposal, approval of each proposal requires a vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.

While the Say-on-Pay Proposal is advisory in nature and non-binding, the Board will review the voting results and expects to take it into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

How are votes counted?

With respect to the Nominee Proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the Nominee Proposal.

With respect to the Ratification Proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. Abstentions will be counted as a vote “AGAINST” the Ratification Proposal.

With respect to the Say-on-Pay Proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. Abstentions will be counted as a vote “AGAINST” the Say-on-Pay Proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Proposal.

If you just sign and submit your proxy card without voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” each director nominee listed herein and “FOR” the other proposals as recommended by the Board and in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the proxy with respect to any other matters that may be voted upon.

2

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Investor Communications Services (“Broadridge”) will tabulate the votes, and representatives of Broadridge will act as inspectors of election.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

How can I attend and vote at the Annual Meeting?

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting live via audio webcast. Any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting live online at seaworld.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. If you were a stockholder as of the Record Date, or you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting, you can vote at the Annual Meeting. A summary of the information you need to attend the Annual Meeting online is provided below:

Will I be able to participate in the online Annual Meeting on the same basis I would be able to participate in a live annual meeting?

We are implementing the online meeting format for the Annual Meeting to enable full and equal participation by all our stockholders from any place in the world at little to no cost. We believe that holding the Annual Meeting online provides the opportunity for participation by a broader group of stockholders while reducing environmental impacts and the costs associated with planning, holding and arranging logistics for in-person meeting proceedings.

We designed the format of the online Annual Meeting to ensure that our stockholders who attend our Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting and to enhance stockholder access, participation and communication through online tools. We will take the following steps to ensure such an experience:

3

How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by granting a proxy. Specifically, you may vote:

If you hold your shares in street name, you may also submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your bank, broker, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on June 12, 2018 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.

Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than June 12, 2018.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice on or about the same time?

It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card or, if you vote by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice you receive.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

You may change your vote and revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy) using any of the methods described above (and until the applicable deadline for each method), by providing a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc., 9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32819 prior to your shares being voted, or by attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet and voting. Attendance at the meeting via the Internet will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee following the instruction it has provided, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet and voting.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

4

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees (for no additional compensation) in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

5

PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At our 2016 Annual Meeting, our stockholders adopted an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to phase in the declassification of our Board commencing with the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, as so amended, the directors elected at the 2017 Annual Meeting were elected for one-year terms, and beginning with the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the entire Board will be elected on an annual basis.

On May 8, 2017, in connection with the closing of the Sale (as defined below), Peter F. Wallace notified the Board of Directors that he would resign from the Board, effective immediately after the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting. On June 14, 2017, following the 2017 Annual Meeting and pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement described below under “Transactions with Related Persons,” in connection with the acquisition by an affiliate of Zhonghong Zhuoye Group Co., Ltd. (“ZHG Group”), Sun Wise (UK) Co., Ltd (“ZHG”), of approximately 21% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (the “Sale”) from certain funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group L.P. (“Blackstone”), the Company increased the size of the Board of Directors from 10 directors to 11 directors and appointed two ZHG director designees to the Board of Directors, Yoshikazu Maruyama and Yongli Wang, for initial terms expiring in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Mr. Maruyama was appointed to a newly-created directorship and Mr. Wang was appointed to the directorship vacated by Mr. Wallace.

On September 7, 2017, each of David F. D’Alessandro, Judith A. McHale and Ellen O. Tauscher notified the Board of Directors of their respective decisions to resign from their positions as members of the Board, effective as of October 9, 2017.

On September 12, 2017, the Board elected Mr. Maruyama to serve as its Chairperson and Donald C. Robinson to serve as its independent Lead Director, in each case, effective October 9, 2017.

On November 5, 2017, pursuant to the cooperation agreement between the Company and Hill Path Capital LP (“Hill Path”) described below under “Transactions with Related Persons,” the Company agreed to decrease the size of the Board from eleven directors to nine directors and to fill the remaining vacancy on the Board by appointing a Hill Path designee, Scott I. Ross, to the Board of Directors for an initial term expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

On February 26, 2018, Joel K. Manby resigned as a member of the Board of Directors, Mr. Maruyama was appointed to serve as interim Executive Chairman of the Board and the Company decreased the size of the Board from nine directors to eight directors. Accordingly, our Board of Directors currently consists of eight directors.

The full Board of Directors has considered and nominated the following slate of nominees for a one-year term expiring in 2019: Ronald Bension, William Gray, Yoshikazu Maruyama, Thomas E. Moloney and Scott I. Ross. Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of these five nominees. Our directors whose terms continue beyond the Annual Meeting include Donald C. Robinson, Deborah M. Thomas and Yongli Wang, whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2019.

Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named in the form of proxy card (the “proxyholders”) attached to this proxy statement intend to vote the proxies held by them for the election of Ronald Bension, William Gray, Yoshikazu Maruyama, Thomas E. Moloney and Scott I. Ross. If any of these five nominees ceases to be a candidate for election by the time of the Annual Meeting (a contingency which the Board does not expect to occur), such proxies may be voted by the proxyholders in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.

6

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2018

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the term of each director nominee. In addition, each of our director nominees maintains a significant ownership interest in the Company in accordance with our stock ownership policy for directors, which is described below under “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2017—Stock Ownership Guidelines.” Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the director nominees is shown under “Ownership of Securities” below.

7

8

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE

ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

9

Continuing Members of the Board of Directors

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the term of each director whose term continues beyond the Annual Meeting and who is not subject to election this year. In addition, each of our directors is expected to maintain a significant ownership interest in the Company in accordance with our stock ownership policy for directors which is described below under “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2017—Stock Ownership Guidelines.” Beneficial ownership of equity securities for these directors is also shown under “Ownership of Securities” below.

Directors Whose Term Expires in 2019

10

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Our Board manages or directs the business and affairs of the Company, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its business through meetings of the Board and four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Revenue Committee.

Our Board evaluates the Company’s corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis with a view towards maintaining the best corporate governance practices in the context of the Company’s current business environment and aligning our governance practices closely with the interests of our shareholders. During the course of 2015 and 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducted a comprehensive review of the Company’s governance profile, current best practices in corporate governance and considered recommendations of governance experts and input from the Company’s stockholders, which resulted in proposals presented at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to declassify our Board and adopt majority voting for director elections, both of which were approved by our stockholders.

Engagement with Shareholders

Our Board and management value the perspectives of our shareholders and work to provide our shareholders with continuous and meaningful engagement. Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have made outreach to our shareholders, both as a result of questions asked as well as on a proactive basis, one of their top priorities, and the Board receives that feedback directly and promptly. The Company is responsive to analysts as well.

We attend investor conferences and hold one-on-one meetings with shareholders and potential investors throughout the United States as well as overseas. In addition, we have telephonic calls with shareholders and analysts on a regular basis, review correspondence submitted by shareholders to management and/or the Board, and have discussions with proxy advisory services on the topic of implementing best practices in corporate governance.

11

Our Board has also proactively taken steps to continue to ensure best governance practices, refresh its membership, and deepen its relevant experience, including:

Consistent with our approach of proactively engaging shareholders on corporate governance issues, in October 2017, our Board launched a strategic shareholder engagement program with investors focused primarily on key governance issues. Our Board Chairman and Lead Director reached out to several of the Company’s shareholders. We have continued to build on these efforts, including through the active involvement of our Board in shareholder outreach so that the Board is able to hear shareholder perspectives on a range of topics.

Communications with the Board

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the chairperson of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance or Revenue Committees or to the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to the General Counsel of the Company, 9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32819. Such communications may be done confidentially or anonymously.

Director Independence and Independence Determinations

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and NYSE rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

The Board has established guidelines of director independence to assist it in making independence determinations, which conform to the independence requirements in the NYSE listing standards. In addition to applying these guidelines, which are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (which may be found on the Corporate Governance page of the Investor Relations section on our website at www.seaworldentertainment.com), the Board of Directors will consider all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination. The Board’s policy is to review the independence of all directors at least annually. In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the independence guidelines, the Board will determine in its judgment whether such relationship is material.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee undertook its annual review of director independence and made a recommendation to our Board regarding director independence. As a result of this review, our Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Bension, Gray, Moloney, Robinson, Ross and Wang and Ms. Thomas is independent under the guidelines for director independence set forth in the Corporate

12

Governance Guidelines and for purposes of applicable NYSE standards, including with respect to committee service. The Board had also determined that each of Mr. D’Alessandro and Mses. McHale and Tauscher, who served as directors for a portion of 2017, was independent under the guidelines for director independence set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and for purposes of applicable NYSE standards during the portion of 2017 he or she served as a director of the Company. Our Board has also determined that each member of our Audit Committee (Messrs. Bension and Moloney and Ms. Thomas) is “independent” for purposes of NYSE listing standards and Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and that each member of our Compensation Committee (Messrs. Gray and Moloney and Ms. Thomas) is “independent” for purposes of NYSE listing standards and Section 10C(a)(3) of the Exchange Act.

Board Structure

In September 2017, the Board elected Mr. Maruyama to serve as our Non-Executive Chairman and appointed Mr. Robinson to serve as our independent Lead Director, and in February 2018, appointed Mr. Maruyama to serve as our interim Executive Chairman following the departure of Joel K. Manby, our former President and Chief Executive Officer. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the position of Lead Director whenever the Chairman of the Board is also the Chief Executive Officer or is a director who does not otherwise qualify as an independent director, or the Board otherwise determines it is appropriate to elect a Lead Director. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Lead Director is responsible for helping to assure appropriate oversight of Company management by the Board and optimal functioning of the Board. The independent directors elect the Lead Director from among the independent directors. A more complete description of the role of Lead Director is set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Additionally, the Chief Executive Officer position is separate from the Chairman position. Until his departure in February 2018, Mr. Joel K. Manby served as our Chief Executive Officer while Mr. Maruyama served as our Non-Executive Chairman. Mr. John C. Reilly currently serves as our Interim Chief Executive Officer and is not a member of our Board. We expect that the individual we appoint as our Chief Executive Officer on a permanent basis will also be appointed to serve as a member of our Board and Mr. Maruyama will resume his role as Non-Executive Chairman at that time. Our Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for us at this time as this structure encourages the free and open dialogue of competing views and provides for strong checks and balances. Additionally, Mr. Maruyama’s attention to Board and committee matters allows Mr. Reilly to focus more specifically on overseeing the Company’s day to day operations as well as strategic opportunities and planning.

Board Committees and Meetings

The following table summarizes the current membership of each of the Board’s Committees.

All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and the annual meeting of stockholders. All of the directors then in office attended the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. During 2017, the Board held twenty meetings

13

and acted four times by unanimous written consent. During 2017, (i) the Audit Committee held eighteen meetings; (ii) the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held seventeen meetings and acted once by unanimous written consent; (iii) the Compensation Committee held ten meetings and acted three times by unanimous written consent; and (iv) the Revenue Committee held five meetings. No member of the Board attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served (held during the period that such director served).

Following an assessment of the Board’s standing committees, in April 2018, the Board eliminated its Regulatory & Governmental Affairs Committee in order to make our governance structure more efficient. Most of the responsibilities of the Regulatory & Governmental Affairs Committee were assumed by the Audit Committee given their key role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and procedures, while the remainder were assumed by the full Board. The Regulatory & Governmental Affairs Committee met six times in 2017 and was responsible for (i) reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to regulatory risk assessment, regulatory risk management and measures taken to address such risks; (ii) periodically, reviewing and discussing with the Company’s General Counsel and/or the Company’s Senior Corporate Affairs Officer any regulatory matter that could have a significant impact on the Company’s business; and (iii) overseeing the strategic goals, objectives, progress and direction of the Company’s governmental regulatory affairs.

Committee Membership

Audit Committee

All members of the Audit Committee are “independent,” consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and audit committees in particular. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board has determined that Ms. Thomas and Mr. Moloney qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined by applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations. The Board reached its conclusion as to Ms. Thomas’ qualification based on, among other things, Ms. Thomas’ experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Hasbro, Inc. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Moloney’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Moloney’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of John Hancock Financial Services. During the course of 2017, our Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Bension, Moloney and Robinson and Ms. Thomas, with Ms. Thomas serving as Chair. Mr. Robinson resigned from the Audit Committee in connection with his appointment as the Board’s Lead Director in October 2017.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.seaworldentertainment.com under Investor Relations: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Audit Committee Charter, and include the following:

14

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee include reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or other public dissemination in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and procedures. See “Oversight of Risk Management” below.

Compensation Committee

All members of the Compensation Committee are “independent,” consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and compensation committees in particular. During the course of 2017, our Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. D’Alessandro and Gray and Ms. Tauscher, and in connection with the departure of Mr. D’Alessandro and Ms. Tauscher from the Board, Mr. Moloney and Ms. Thomas were appointed to the Compensation Committee in September 2017.

The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.seaworldentertainment.com under Investor Relations: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Compensation Committee Charter, and include the following:

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee include overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to the Board for

15

inclusion in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The charter of the Compensation Committee permits the Compensation Committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees and to delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make awards to any non-Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s incentive-compensation or other equity-based plan, subject to compliance with the plan and the laws of the state of the Company’s jurisdiction (the “Equity Award Subcommittee”). During the course of 2017, the Equity Award Subcommittee consisted of only the director serving in the office of the Chief Executive Officer which acted twice in accordance with the Company’s Equity Award Grant Policy. See “Executive Compensation Governance Practices – Equity Award Grant Policy” below. In February 2018, the Compensation Committee expanded the membership of the Equity Award Subcommittee to consist of both (i) the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee and (ii) the director serving in the office of the Chief Executive Officer.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the course of 2017, our Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. D’Alessandro and Gray and Ms. Tauscher and then Mr. Moloney and Ms. Thomas after the departure of Mr. D’Alessandro and Ms. Tauscher. None of the members of our Compensation Committee is, or has at any time during the past year been, an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers currently serve, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are “independent,” consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the applicable NYSE listing standards. During the course of 2017, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisted of Mr. Gray and Mses. McHale and Tauscher, and in connection with the departure of Mses. McHale and Tauscher from the Board, Messrs. Bension and Robinson were appointed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in September 2017. The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.seaworldentertainment.com under Investor Relations: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and include the following:

Revenue Committee

The Revenue Committee was formed in January 2017 and, during the course of 2017, consisted of Messrs. Bension, Gray and Robinson, and in connection with the election of Mr. Maruyama as Chairman of the Board

16

and the election of Mr. Ross to the Board, Messrs. Maruyama and Ross were appointed to the Revenue Committee in October 2017 and November 2017, respectively. The Revenue Committee met five times during 2017. The duties and responsibilities of the Revenue Committee are set forth in its charter, and include the following:

Special Committees

From time to time the Board may form and appoint members to special committees with responsibility to address topics designated at the time of such committee formation. As discussed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2017, the Board established a special committee of disinterested directors (the “Special Committee (ZHG Transaction)”) in connection with the Sale and the Company’s related arrangements with ZHG and its affiliates. None of the members of the Special Committee (ZHG Transaction) were affiliated with Blackstone or the ZHG Group or their respective affiliates. The Special Committee (ZHG Transaction)’s process included engaging and receiving advice from independent legal and financial advisors, holding eight meetings with its advisors, extensive negotiations with the ZHG Group and its advisors relating to its governance arrangements with the Company and review of the potential benefits, including the concept development and design agreements described below under “Transactions with Related Persons” and future collaboration opportunities with the ZHG Group and its affiliates in China and elsewhere. In connection with the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigation and subpoenas from the staff of the SEC, as discussed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Board formed a Special Committee (the “Special Committee (Regulatory Investigations)”) comprised of independent directors with respect to these inquiries. The Special Committee (Regulatory Investigations) engaged counsel to advise and assist such committee regarding the DOJ and SEC inquiries. During 2017, the Special Committee (Regulatory Investigations) met seventeen times.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has extensive involvement in the oversight of risk management related to us and our business and accomplishes this oversight through the regular reporting by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee represents the Board by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, the surveillance of administrative and financial controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal, and internal audit functions, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of our business and summarizes for the Board all areas of risk and the appropriate mitigating factors. Each of the other Board committees considers risks related to matters within the scope of its responsibilities as part of its regular meeting agendas, and the committee chairs report to the full Board regarding matters considered by their committees following each committee meeting. In addition, our Board receives periodic detailed operating performance reviews from management.

Compensation Committee Risk Assessment

With the assistance of W.T. Haigh & Company, Inc. (“Haigh”), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive compensation risk assessment. The assessment focused on the design and application of the Company’s executive and

17

non-executive compensation programs and whether such programs encourage excessive risk taking by executive officers and other employees. Based on the outcomes of this assessment, the Compensation Committee believes, and Haigh concurs, that the Company’s compensation programs (i) do not motivate our executive officers or our nonexecutive employees to take excessive risks, (ii) are well designed to encourage behaviors aligned with the long-term interests of stockholders, and (iii) are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Cybersecurity Risk

With respect to cybersecurity risk oversight, our Board of Directors and our Audit Committee receive periodic updates from the appropriate managers on the primary cybersecurity risks facing the Company and the measures the Company is taking to mitigate such risks. In addition to such periodic reports, our Board of Directors and our Audit Committee receive updates from management as to changes to the Company’s cybersecurity risk profile or significant newly identified risks.

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions, which are meetings of the non-management members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and non-independent directors. The Non-Executive Chairman or Lead Director presides at the executive sessions. The Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Revenue Committees also meet regularly in executive session.

Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Board’s views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time by the Board and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by the full Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include our categorical standards of director independence, our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Revenue Committee charters and other corporate governance information are available on the Corporate Governance page of the Investor Relations section on our website at www.seaworldentertainment.com. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary at SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc., 9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32819.

Code of Conduct

We maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior financial officers. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, use of our assets and business conduct and fair dealing. This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also satisfies the requirements for a code of ethics, as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K.

The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be found on our website at www.seaworldentertainment.com under Investor Relations: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

18

As described in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Company’s directors, officers and employees are provided with three avenues through which they can report violations or suspected violations with respect to addressing any ethical questions or concerns: a toll-free phone line, in writing, and a website. The toll-free number for the Company’s directors, officers and employees is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Directors, officers and employees may also report integrity concerns via the website. Directors, officers and employees can choose to remain anonymous in reporting violations or suspected violations. In addition, we maintain a formal non-retaliation policy that prohibits action or retaliation against any director, officer or employee who makes a report in good faith even if the facts alleged are not confirmed by subsequent investigation.

Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board and recommends nominees for director to the Board for election. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the size, composition and combined expertise of the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does at a minimum assess each candidate’s strength of character, mature judgment, industry knowledge or experience, his or her ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board and his or her ability to satisfy any applicable legal requirements or listing standards. In addition, although the Board considers diversity of viewpoints, background and experiences, the Board does not have a formal diversity policy. In identifying prospective director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals from other members of the Board, management, stockholders and other sources. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may, but need not, retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral. When considering director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Board’s effectiveness.

The stockholders’ agreement described below under “Transactions with Related Persons—ZHG Stockholders’ Agreement” provides that ZHG has the right to nominate to our Board two designees for so long as ZHG owns at least 20% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Currently, Mr. Maruyama and Mr. Wang, who were nominated by ZHG, serve on our Board of Directors. Mr. Maruyama has also been nominated for re-election this year, see “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Additionally, the cooperation agreement described below under “Transactions with Related Persons—Hill Path Agreements” provides that Hill Path has the right to nominate to our Board one designee, who is Mr. Ross. Currently, Mr. Ross serves on our Board of Directors and has been nominated for re-election this year, see “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

In connection with its annual recommendation of a slate of nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also assess the contributions of those directors recommended for re-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board. When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the board member’s biographical information set forth above. Each of the Company’s directors possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity and exercises careful, mature judgment. Each is committed to employing his or her skills and abilities to aid the long-term interests of the stakeholders of the Company. In addition, our directors are knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business, governmental, or civic endeavors, which further qualifies them for service as members of the Board. A significant number of our directors possess experience in owning and managing public and

19

privately held enterprises and are familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities that are unique to publicly traded companies like ours.

This annual director nomination process resulted in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation to the Board, and the Board’s nomination, of the five incumbent directors named in this Proxy Statement and proposed for election by you at the upcoming Annual Meeting. With respect to Mr. Bension’s nomination, in 2015 and 2016, as a part of a governance review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducted an extensive search for qualified director candidates. Based on the results of the search process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the appointment of Mr. Bension as director to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Jim Atchison, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, in April 2016.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly considers director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any recommendation submitted to the Corporate Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc., 9205 South Park Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32819. All recommendations for nomination received by the Corporate Secretary that satisfy our by-law requirements relating to such director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Stockholders must also satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent and information requirements set forth in our by-laws. These requirements are also described under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the 2019 Annual Meeting”.

20

Executive Officers of the Company

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the executive officers is shown under “Ownership of Securities” below.

21

22

PROPOSAL NO. 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

Although ratification is not required by our by-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Deloitte  & Touche LLP unless you specify otherwise.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for 2017 and 2016 and fees billed for other services rendered for those periods:

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and the Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement.

Each year, the Audit Committee approves an annual budget for such audit and permitted non-audit services and requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year. The Audit Committee has authorized Deloitte & Touche LLP’s commencement of work on such permitted services within that budget, although the Chair of the Audit Committee may pre-approve any such audit and permitted non-audit services that exceed the initial budget. During the year, circumstances may arise that make it necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services that would exceed the initial budget. The Audit Committee has delegated

23

the authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to review such circumstances and to grant approval when appropriate. All such approvals are then reported by the Audit Committee Chair to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018.

24

PROPOSAL NO. 3—NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to stockholder vote to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed on pages 28 to 65. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of this vote.

The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 3 is as follows:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 28 to 65, as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 15 to 16.

In particular, stockholders should note the following:

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

25

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the discussion of “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committee Membership—Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for auditing our internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301 “Communications with Audit Committees.” In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Deborah M. Thomas, Chair

Ronald Bension

Thomas E. Moloney

26

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement relating to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

Thomas Moloney, Chair

William Gray

Deborah M. Thomas

27

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is designed to provide our stockholders with a clear understanding of our compensation philosophy and objectives, compensation-setting process and the 2017 compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs). In addition, the following report includes a summary of important changes in our 2018 compensation program which are designed to strengthen the performance orientation of our rewards and to better support stockholder interests. For 2017, our named executive officers were:

Executive Summary

2017 Business Highlights

28

Leadership Changes

NEO Compensation Actions for 2017

Our Total Compensation Program Checklist

Our Compensation Programs Include:

+    Performance-based variable compensation. Over 80% of CEO compensation and over 70% of other NEO compensation is based on performance or stock price variable.

+    Emphasis on equity compensation to align our interests with those of our stockholders (approximately

      74% of CEO pay and 60% of other NEO pay is stock-based).

+    Reasonable termination and change in control provisions including double trigger equity vesting and no

      tax gross-ups for Section 280G excise tax.

+    Share ownership guidelines that require owning a significant amount of company stock.

+    No repricing of underwater stock options.

+    Programs that do not encourage excessive risk.

+    Prohibition on hedging and limitations on pledging company stock.

+    Limited use of perquisites.

29

2017 Say-On-Pay Vote and Stockholder Outreach

At our annual meeting of stockholders in June 2017, we held our annual vote on an advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“say-on-pay”). The compensation of our named executive officers reported in our 2017 proxy statement was approved by less than 50% of the votes cast, which was not satisfactory to us or our Board. In an effort to increase our stockholder approval percentage at the Annual Meeting, our Board of Directors carefully considered the results of this say-on-pay vote and took the following actions with respect to our executive compensation program:

Key Changes to Our Executive Compensation Program in 2018

Following the meetings and review described above, we made changes to our compensation program in 2018 to more closely align the compensation of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders and the success of the Company. We:

The changes to our long-term and annual incentive awards are discussed in more detail on pages 41 to 42.

30

Our Total Rewards Philosophy

Key Rewards Principles:

We believe we must provide total rewards that will attract, retain and motivate an outstanding executive team to achieve our challenging business goals and create value for our stockholders. To accomplish this, our compensation program is designed to support the following key reward principles:

Elements of 2017 Compensation

Our compensation program is made up of the following three direct compensation elements:

31

Our 2017 Mix of Target Compensation

Our compensation is structured to ensure that a significant portion of the total compensation opportunity for our named executive officers is directly related to our performance and other factors that directly and indirectly influence stockholder value. For 2017, our fixed compensation versus targeted variable compensation was structured as follows for our CEO and other named executive officers:

We also believe our executive compensation should be structured to appropriately balance cash compensation with equity-based compensation. For 2017, our target annual cash versus long-term equity-based compensation was structured as follows for our CEO and other named executive officers:

32

For 2017, the following was the targeted mix of compensation for base salary, annual incentives and long-term equity incentives:

Pay-For-Performance—Total Compensation Opportunity Versus Realized Compensation

Our programs are designed to reward our named executive officers with fully competitive compensation when we achieve our short- and longer-term goals. When we fail to meet our performance goals, actual total pay will be below each executive’s target total compensation opportunity. When we meet or exceed our short- and longer-term performance goals, actual total pay may be at or significantly above each executive’s target total compensation opportunity. The following chart illustrates this concept by comparing 2016 and 2017 target total compensation opportunity versus actual realized pay in each of 2016 and 2017*:

Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee, Management and Consultant

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for making all executive compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. At the beginning of each performance cycle, the Compensation Committee approves financial goals designed to align executive pay with company performance

33

and stockholder interests, provide competitive pay opportunities dependent on company performance, retain talent, create optimal stockholder value and mitigate material risk. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. All members of the Board of Directors provide input to the Compensation Committee for consideration in the design and implementation of the compensation programs to ensure a transparent process.

In 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Haigh as its independent compensation consultant. Haigh provides advisory services only with respect to executive and non-employee director compensation, and works with management only with the approval and under the direction of the Compensation Committee. Haigh reviewed the compensation components of our 2017 program for our named executive officers and advised the Compensation Committee regarding the components and levels of the executive compensation program, including our incentive and equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee has reviewed our company’s relationships with Haigh and has determined there are no conflicts of interest.

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer work closely with the Compensation Committee and Haigh in managing our executive compensation program and they attend meetings of the Compensation Committee. Because of his daily involvement with the executive team, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation for the executive officers other than himself. Neither our Chief Executive Officer nor our Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer participates in discussions with the Compensation Committee regarding his own compensation.

Peer Companies

The Compensation Committee directed Haigh to compare our executive compensation with competitive market compensation data for a peer group consisting of companies engaged in the same or similar industries as our Company. Due to the limited number of “pure leisure facilities” public companies, our Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to also include other companies in the compensation peer group that are in the entertainment, restaurant and hospitality industries and compete with us for executive talent.

The Compensation Committee uses peer company data provided by Haigh to guide its review of the total compensation of our executive officers and generally reviews the compensation data of our peer companies and industry to understand market competitive compensation. The Compensation Committee focuses on ensuring that the elements of our executive compensation program are consistent and competitive with peer and industry trends.

For purposes of the 2017 compensation decisions and the development of changes to our 2018 compensation program, the Compensation Committee approved a peer group based on analysis and recommendations by Haigh. This peer group is comprised of the following 16 companies:

2017 Compensation Design and Decisions

Base Salaries

Our philosophy is to pay base salaries that reflect each executive’s performance, experience and scope of responsibilities and provide levels of pay competitive with our industry practices for similar roles. Base salaries

34

are reviewed annually with the opportunity for merit increase based on individual performance and position in salary range.

As part of our cost control initiatives, there were no merit-based salary increases for our named executive officers in 2017, however the Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Swanson’s annual base salary in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in August 2017:

2017 Annual Cash & Stock Incentive Awards

Annual incentive awards are a key component of our total compensation program. These incentives are available to all of our salaried exempt employees including our named executive officers under our 2017 Bonus Plan.

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee established target annual bonus opportunities for our named executive officers, payable 50% in cash and 50% in performance-vesting restricted stock, described in further detail below. In 2017, we reduced the target bonus opportunity for the named executive officers to be better aligned with mid-market target bonus opportunities:

The 2017 Bonus Plan had two components:

35

In 2017, in order to create a more balanced scorecard of annual performance, rather than basing annual performance solely on Adjusted EBITDA, we based the payout with respect to each of the Cash Component and the Stock Component on Adjusted EBITDA, Total Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA Margin (defined as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Total Revenue), weighted as follows:

The Adjusted EBITDA, Total Revenue, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin performance targets were determined by our Compensation Committee early in the year, after taking into consideration management’s recommendations and our Board approved budget for the year. If threshold Adjusted EBITDA performance (the “funding hurdle”) was not met or exceeded, no amounts would be paid out in respect of the fiscal 2017 annual incentive awards. If the funding hurdle was met but threshold Total Revenue or Adjusted EBITDA Margin performance was not met or exceeded, no amounts would be paid out in respect of such metric. The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance amounts for each of the three performance metrics, as well as the payout percentages for each category. To the extent that performance fell between the applicable threshold, target or maximum performance levels for each of the three performance metrics, payouts would be determined using linear interpolation.

For fiscal 2017, our actual Adjusted EBITDA was $300.8 million, thus the funding hurdle was not met and no amounts were earned under the 2017 Bonus Plan. Accordingly, our NEOs received no cash payment in respect of the 2017 Bonus Plan and the shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2017 Bonus Plan were forfeited. No discretionary bonus was paid to any of our named executive officers for 2017.

Sign-On Bonus Award

Mr. Roddy’s employment agreement provided for a sign-on bonus of $200,000, of which 50% was paid in 2016 following his commencement date and the remaining 50% was paid on June 20, 2017, his one-year anniversary of employment.

2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards

The long-term incentive award program is designed to mirror Company performance, align the executives’ interest with our stockholders and retain executives through vesting of awards over multiple years. Long-term incentive compensation is awarded under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and provides an opportunity for executive officers, including our named executive officers, and other key employees to increase their ownership interest in the Company through grants of equity-based awards. Under the Plan, equity-based awards may be awarded in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and other stock based awards.

Each participant in the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan has a long-term incentive target stated as a percentage of salary. The target long-term incentive opportunity for each of Messrs. Manby, Crage and Roddy was set forth in their respective employment agreements. Ms. Godreau’s target long-term incentive opportunity

36

was set forth in her offer letter. Mr. Taylor’s and Mr. Swanson’s target long-term incentive opportunities remained unchanged from 2016:

We made a number of changes in our 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan which we believe strengthen the long-term focus of the plan and are in the best interests of our stockholders:

37

(Cumulative NOPAT – (Base Period NOPAT * 3))

Cumulative Cash CAPEX

For purposes of this formula, the following terms mean:

Each time-vesting restricted stock and performance-vesting restricted stock award is subject to restrictive covenants related to non-competition during employment and for a period of one year following any termination of employment and non-solicitation during employment and for a period of two years following any termination of employment as well as indefinite covenants relating to non-disparagement, confidentiality and intellectual property. These awards are subject to clawback or forfeiture if the recipient breaches any of the restrictive covenants or otherwise engages in any Detrimental Activity (as defined in the Plan).

38

Special Retention Awards

On August 29, 2017 and October 27, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved one-time equity retention awards (collectively referred to as the “Retention Awards”) for Mr. Swanson and Mr. Taylor, respectively. In light of Mr. Swanson’s new position and Messrs. Swanson’s and Taylor’s responsibilities, their value to the organization, and in order to address the lack of retention value of outstanding equity awards held by them, the Compensation Committee approved the Retention Awards to encourage Messrs. Swanson and Taylor to remain with the Company on a long-term basis. The Retention Award for Mr. Swanson provides for a one-time grant of time-vesting restricted stock with a grant date fair value equal to $175,000 which will vest over two years, with fifty percent (50%) vesting on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to Mr. Swanson’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Retention Award for Mr. Taylor provides for a one-time grant of time-vesting restricted stock with a grant date fair value equal to $362,000 (100% of Mr. Taylor’s 2017 base salary) which will vest over three years, with one-third (1/3) vesting on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to Mr. Taylor’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

Sign-on Equity Award

Pursuant to the terms of her offer letter, Ms. Godreau received a one-time restricted stock award with a grant date fair value equal to $500,000 on January 3, 2017. These shares shall vest in three equal annual installments over the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to Ms. Godreau’s continued employment through each such date. The award is also subject to the other terms and conditions set forth in the Company’s standard stock award agreement and described above under “—2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Ms. Godreau forfeited two of the three vesting installments of her sign-on award upon leaving her position with the Company on March 26, 2018.

Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Granted in Prior Years

The performance-vesting restricted stock we granted in 2016 vests at the end of the 2016-2018 performance period and the performance-vesting restricted stock we granted in 2015 vests at the end of the 2015-2017 performance period, in each case based upon our performance versus Adjusted EBITDA (as defined above) for each of the three fiscal years in the performance period. Approximately one third of the total target number of performance-vesting restricted stock granted to a named executive officer (one “Tranche”) is eligible to be earned based on our performance for each fiscal year of the performance period. If threshold performance is not met in a fiscal year, no shares will be earned for that Tranche even if performance targets for subsequent Tranches are met and all unearned shares will be forfeited at the end of the three year performance period. Separate Adjusted EBITDA targets are set for each fiscal year of the performance period during the first 90 days of each fiscal year. For actual performance between the threshold, target and maximum levels, the number of shares earned will be adjusted on a linear basis.

After taking into consideration management’s recommendations and our Board approved budget for the applicable performance period, the Compensation Committee sets Adjusted EBITDA targets for each performance period that are designed to provide a reasonably achievable, but challenging, set of goals for our NEOS and other long-term incentive plan participants. The following Adjusted EBITDA target was set for the Fiscal 2017 Tranche of the 2015-2017 and 2016-2018 performance periods:

For fiscal 2017, our actual Adjusted EBITDA was $300.8 million which was below the performance threshold set at 90% of target and no shares were earned for the Fiscal 2017 Tranche for either the 2015-2017 performance period or the 2016-2018 performance period.

39

Other Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock

In 2017, Messrs. Swanson and Taylor had outstanding performance-vesting restricted stock under our previous incentive plan (the “2.75x Performance Restricted shares”) which was implemented at the time of the Company’s initial public offering in 2013. The 2.75x Performance Restricted shares were to vest if the executive was employed by the Company when and if funds affiliated with Blackstone received cash proceeds (not subject to any clawback, indemnity or similar contractual obligation) in respect of their investment equal to (x) a 15% annualized effective compounded return rate on such funds’ investment and (y) a 2.75x multiple on such funds’ investment. In connection with the Sale, our Board determined that in order to compensate existing management for substantially delivering on the performance targets required under the terms of the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares, the Company would partially vest 60% of the outstanding 2.75x Performance Restricted shares held by certain of the Company’s equity plan participants upon the closing of the Sale, subject to continued service through such date. In exchange for the Company modifying the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares to vest 60%, eight of the Company’s senior executives, including Messrs. Swanson and Taylor, and the Company’s former Chairman of the Board, David D’Alessandro, individually agreed to forfeit the remaining 40% of their outstanding 2.75x Performance Restricted shares upon the closing of the Sale. In addition, in accordance with his Separation and Consulting Agreement, which contractually obligated the Company to apply any modifications to his outstanding 2.75x Performance Restricted shares, Jim Atchison, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, also vested in 60% of his 2.75x Performance Restricted shares and agreed to forfeit the other 40% upon the closing of the Sale. Based on the foregoing modification, approximately 455,000 of the total outstanding 2.75x Performance Restricted shares vested upon closing of the Sale. The number of 2.75x Performance Restricted shares that are fully vested in connection with the modification and consummation of the Sale for Messrs. Swanson and Taylor was 9,307 and 20,616 shares, respectively. The fair value in connection with the modification of Messrs. Swanson’s and Taylor’s 2.75x Performance Restricted shares is reflected in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

In determining to modify the outstanding 2.75x Performance Restricted shares, the Board considered several factors. Specifically, the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares were originally issued at the time of the Company’s initial public offering to a large group of Company employees in exchange for equity awards issued by the Company when it was a private company. Consequently, as disclosed at the time, the vesting terms of the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares were similar to those of the legacy awards, including triggers based on return on investment realized by Blackstone.

The 2.75x Performance Restricted shares were primarily held by over 60 key members of operating management and employees, including park presidents and managers. None of the new senior leadership at that time – CEO, CFO, Chief Human Resources and Culture Officer, Chief Marketing Officer and others – held any of these shares. Most of the covered individuals had been working for several years to stabilize the Company, drive attendance, and, more recently, implement the Company’s new strategic plan and brand positioning – in most cases without bonuses or meaningful long-term incentive compensation due to circumstances that were largely outside their control.

As part of its deliberations, the Board received and considered a recommendation from the Company’s CEO that the Board incentivize these employees because the Company was entering a critical phase of its strategic growth plan – including the opening of seven major attractions across its entire footprint – and having a motivated and experienced team was crucial to achieving the Company’s 2017 goals.

The Board took steps to ensure the objectivity, fairness, and independence of the process. Specifically:

40

After considering several factors, including certain contractual obligations, significantly exceeding the required internal rate of return target and achieving 97% of the targeted cumulative return on Blackstone’s invested capital, along with the CEO’s recommendation, the Board determined that it would be appropriate and in the best interest of shareholders to partially vest the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares in an effort to improve morale and retention at a time when the focus and commitment of the covered employees was especially important to deliver the Company’s goals.

Additionally, the Board considered that in accordance with the relevant accounting guidance, the Company would have been required to recognize non-cash equity compensation expense upon closing of the Sale, regardless of whether or not the shares vested in accordance with their terms. As a result of the modifications to the 2.75x Performance Restricted shares, this non-cash expense was reduced by $1.2 million.

2018 Program Design

2018 Base Salary

Base salary ranges were established in 2017 which were positioned at the mid-market salary levels for similar positions in our peer companies. No changes to the base salary ranges were made in 2018 and due to our continued cost reduction initiatives, generally no salary increases were made to our NEOs in 2018 that were not related to a promotion.

2018 Annual Cash & Stock Incentive Awards

As described briefly in the Executive Summary, we have made several changes to our 2018 Bonus Plan which we believe strengthen the performance focus of the plan and are in the best interests of our stockholders:

The financial performance goals under the 2018 Bonus Plan have three levels of potential achievement, assuming threshold Adjusted EBITDA performance is met or exceeded:

41

Also new for 2018, in the event Adjusted EBITDA threshold performance is not met, the Compensation Committee may determine to fund a discretionary bonus pool for top performers not to exceed 10% of the total target bonuses for all 2018 Bonus Plan participants. Finally, the 2018 award continues to be in the form of 50% equity (restricted stock units which will be settled in shares of restricted stock) and 50% cash.

2018 Long-Term Incentive Awards

As described briefly in the Executive Summary, we have made several changes to our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan which we believe strengthen the long-term focus of the plan and are in the best interests of our stockholders:

Each participant in the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan has a long-term incentive target stated as a percentage of salary. We granted the following target performance-vesting restricted stock units to our currently-serving NEOs under the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan on March 2, 2018, which represent 67% of the NEOs’ 2018 LTIP Potential Target:

42

Benefits & Perquisites

We provide to all our employees, including our named executive officers, broad-based benefits that are intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and welfare security. Broad-based employee benefits include:

Under our 401(k) savings plan, we match a portion of the funds set aside by the employee. All matching contributions by us become vested on the two-year anniversary of the participant’s hire date. At no cost to the employee, we provide an amount of basic life and accident insurance coverage valued at two times the employee’s annual base salary. The employee may also select supplemental life and accident insurance, for a premium to be paid by the employee.

We also provide our executive officers with limited perquisites and personal benefits that are not generally available to all employees, such as executive relocation assistance and complimentary access to our theme parks. In addition, all employees with at least three weeks of vacation have the opportunity to participate in our vacation sell benefit program and sell back vacation days to us in order to offset personal health insurance premiums. We provide these limited perquisites and personal benefits in order to further our goal of attracting and retaining our executive officers. These benefits and perquisites are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and the accompanying footnote in accordance with SEC rules.

Employment Agreements

We entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Manby, Crage and Roddy in connection with their appointments as President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer, respectively, and an offer letter with Ms. Godreau in connection with her appointment as Chief Marketing Officer. We do not have an employment agreement or offer letter with Mr. Swanson or Mr. Taylor. The employment agreements and offer letter provide the terms of the executive’s compensation, including in the event of termination, and the employment agreements contain restrictive covenants. For a description of the employment agreements and offer letter, as applicable, we entered into with Messrs. Manby, Crage and Roddy and Ms. Godreau, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017—Employment Agreements and Offer Letters.”

Severance Arrangements

Our Board of Directors believes that our Amended and Restated Key Employee Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) is necessary to attract and retain the talent necessary for our long-term success. Our Board of Directors views our Severance Plan as a recruitment and retention device that helps secure the continued employment and dedication of our named executive officers, including when we are considering strategic alternatives.

Each of our named executive officers is eligible for the Severance Plan benefits, however each of Messrs. Manby, Crage, Roddy and Godreau have or had, as applicable, separate severance provisions in their employment agreements or offer letter, as applicable, that govern the terms of their severance (see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination” below for descriptions of these provisions). As discussed in —Leadership Changes above, Messrs. Manby and Crage and Ms. Godreau are no longer with the Company and received severance benefits as described under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination”. Under the terms of the Severance Plan, each participating named executive officer is entitled to severance benefits if his employment is

43

terminated for any reason other than voluntary resignation or willful misconduct. The severance payments under the Severance Plan are contingent upon the affected executive’s execution of a release and waiver of claims, which contains non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions.

Executive Compensation Governance Practices

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In order to align management and stockholder interests, the Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. These guidelines were revised in 2017 to align with the new leadership structure and to increase ownership levels for several executive officers as follows: (i) the Chief Executive Officer is required to hold shares of common stock with a value at least equal to six (6) times his base salary; (ii) all other NEOs are required to hold shares of common stock with a value at least equal to three (3) times such executive’s base salary (increased from two (2) times base salary for the Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer and Chief Creative Officer); (iii) other covered executives are required to hold shares of common stock with a value at least two to three times (2-3) such executive’s base salary (increased from one to two times (1-2)). If an executive officer is not in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines, the executive is required to maintain ownership of at least 50% of the net after-tax shares acquired from the Company pursuant to any equity-based awards received from the Company, until such individual’s stock ownership requirement is met. This retention requirement only applies to net after-tax shares acquired from the Company after the date of initial adoption of the stock ownership guidelines. Because an individual covered by the stock ownership guidelines must retain a percentage of net after-tax shares acquired from Company equity-based awards until such individual satisfies the specified guideline level of ownership, there is no minimum time period required to achieve the specified guideline level of ownership.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy requires executive officers and directors to consult the Company’s General Counsel prior to engaging in transactions involving the Company’s securities. In order to protect the Company from exposure under insider trading laws, executive officers and directors are encouraged to enter into pre-programmed trading plans under Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging or monetization transactions including, but not limited to, through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, variable forward contracts, equity swaps, puts, calls, and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy limits the pledging of Company securities to those situations approved by the Company’s General Counsel.

Equity Award Grant Policy

In March 2015, the Company adopted an Equity Award Grant Policy that formalized our process for granting equity-based awards to executive officers and employees. Under our Equity Award Grant Policy, we will generally grant equity awards on a regularly scheduled basis. If extraordinary circumstances arise such that the Compensation Committee or the Board determines it is advisable to grant an equity award at a time other than as set forth below, the Compensation Committee or the Board may consider and approve any such grant. Grants of equity awards to current employees (other than in connection with a promotion) will generally be made, if at all, on an annual basis on the second business day following the filing of the Company’s Form 10-K, unless such day is not a day on which the New York Stock Exchange (or such other national securities exchange on which the Company’s common stock is then principally listed) is open for trading, in which case it is expected to be the next such trading day. Starting in 2017, the Compensation Committee approved changes in our equity grant practices to eliminate mid-year grants for promotions and for new hires below the senior leadership team unless there are special circumstances with the approval of the Committee.

44

Compliance with IRS Code Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the Company’s federal income tax deduction for any compensation in excess of $1 million paid to named executive officers. Prior to January 1, 2018, the provision did not apply to certain performance-based compensation as long as specified requirements are met. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the qualified performance-based exception, provided the Company will continue to rely on the qualified performance-based exception where able in certain grandfathered provisions.

Prior to the date of our 2017 stockholder meeting, the Company had been able to claim the benefit of a special exemption rule that applies to compensation paid (or compensation in respect of equity awards such as stock options or restricted stock granted) during a specified transition period following the IPO. This transition period ended on the date of our 2017 stockholder meeting. We expect that the Compensation Committee will take the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) into account in its compensation decisions. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that are not exempt under Section 162(m) when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract or retain talent.

Clawback Policy

In 2017, our Compensation Committee adopted a clawback and recoupment policy. The policy covers all executive officers as well as all participants receiving awards under the Plan and, to the extent designated by the Board or the Compensation Committee from time to time by notice to such individual, any other current or former employee, officer, consultant or director of the Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Covered Individuals”). Under the policy, any incentive award or payment that is in excess of the amount that a Covered Individual should otherwise have received under the terms of such award for any reason (including, without limitation, by reason of a financial restatement, mistake in calculations or other administrative error but excluding a restatement resulting from a change in accounting policy or applicable law), the Covered Individual is required to repay any such excess amount to the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide for the cancellation of outstanding awards or forfeiture and repayment of any gain or amount realized on the vesting, exercise or payment of awards if a participant engages in Detrimental Activity (as defined in the Plan). These activities include (i) the breach of any covenants relating to disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, noncompetition, nonsolicitation, nondisparagement or other similar restrictions on conduct contained in any agreement between a Covered Individual and the Company or any written policies of the Company; (ii) any activity that would be grounds to terminate the Covered Individual’s employment or service for Cause; or (iii) any activity, including fraud or other conduct contributing to financial restatement or accounting irregularities.

In addition, as noted above under “—2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards,” our equity awards are subject to restrictive covenants and may be subject to clawback or forfeiture if the recipient breaches any of the restrictive covenants or otherwise engages in any Detrimental Activity (as defined in the Plan).

Compensation Actions Taken in Connection with Leadership Changes

Mr. Reilly

In connection with Mr. Reilly’s appointment as Interim Chief Executive Officer, effective February 26, 2018, the Board approved an increase of $30,000 in his annual base salary to $375,000 and a supplemental restricted stock unit grant with a grant date value of $500,000, which was awarded in connection with the general 2018 equity grant cycle. The restricted stock units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and are in addition to any other equity awards to be made to Mr. Reilly in respect of the 2018 cycle. If Mr. Reilly’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” prior to the vesting date, he would vest in full in the restricted stock units. In addition, Mr. Reilly will be treated as a “Tier 1” employee under the Severance Plan if his employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” during his service as Interim Chief Executive Officer (and for a period of one year thereafter).

45

Mr. Swanson

The Compensation Committee approved a compensatory arrangement with Mr. Swanson in connection with his appointment to the position of Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. The compensation arrangement with Mr. Swanson, effective as of the date of his appointment on August 7, 2017, includes payment to Mr. Swanson of (i) an annual base salary of $350,000, (ii) an annual bonus opportunity with a target amount of 80% of his base salary (which, for fiscal year 2017, was pro-rated for his time served as Chief Financial Officer, with 50% payable in cash and 50% payable in performance vesting restricted stock consistent with the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2017 annual bonus plan) and (iii) beginning fiscal year 2018, subject to the Compensation Committee’s discretion, annual long term equity incentive awards with a target value equal to 150% of his base salary. In addition, in March 2018, Mr. Swanson received a one-time supplemental grant of time-vesting restricted stock with a grant date fair value equal to $245,000 (the “Supplemental Time-Vesting Grant”) and a one-time prorated grant of performance-vesting restricted stock (the “Prorated Performance-Vesting Grant”) to reflect his promotion to the role of Chief Financial Officer. Consistent with the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan:

(a) the Supplemental Time-Vesting Grant will vest over five years, with one-third vesting on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to Mr. Swanson’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date; and

(b) the Prorated Performance-Vesting Grant will vest following the end of the three-year performance period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2019 based upon the Company’s achievement of pre-established performance goals with respect to Adjusted EBITDA (weighted at 50%), Total Revenue (weighted at 30%) and ROIC (weighted at 20%) for the three-year performance period.

46

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us to or on behalf of our named executive officers for services rendered to us for the fiscal years indicated.

47

In addition, the named executive officers (and their spouses) each receive a Corporate Executive Card that entitles them and an unlimited number of guests to complimentary access to our theme parks. There is no incremental cost to us associated with the use of the Corporate Executive Card.

48

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017

The following table provides information relating to grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during 2017.

49

50

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017

Employment Agreements and Offer Letters

We entered into the employment agreements described below with Messrs. Manby, Crage and Roddy and the offer letter described below with Ms. Godreau.

Mr. Manby

In connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effective April 7, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Manby, dated March 16, 2015, and amended as of December 7, 2016 (such employment agreement, as so amended, the “Manby Employment Agreement”). The Manby Employment Agreement provides for an initial three-year term ending on April 7, 2018 with automatic renewal of the employment term for successive one-year periods thereafter. During the employment term, Mr. Manby will serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is entitled to:

Pursuant to the terms of the Manby Employment Agreement, Mr. Manby is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that apply during his employment and for a period of (i) 24 months following the termination of his employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason (or 36 months if such termination occurs during the initial three-year employment term or during the 12-month period following a change in control) or (ii) 12 months following the termination of his employment for any other reason. Mr. Manby is also subject to an indefinite confidentiality covenant, and the Company and Mr. Manby are subject to indefinite mutual non-disparagement covenants.

For information regarding the termination provisions of the Manby Employment Agreement, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination—Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants—Mr. Manby” below.

Mr. Crage

In connection with his appointment as our CFO effective September 1, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Crage, dated August 17, 2015 and amended as of December 7, 2016 (such employment agreement, as so amended, the “Crage Employment Agreement”). The Crage Employment Agreement provides for a three-year term ending on September 1, 2018 with automatic renewal of the employment term for successive one year periods thereafter. During the employment term, Mr. Crage will serve as CFO of the Company and is entitled to:

51

Pursuant to the terms of the Crage Employment Agreement, Mr. Crage is subject to (i) non-competition covenants that apply during his employment and for a period of (a) 24 months following the termination of his employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason during the initial three-year employment term or during the 12-month period following a change in control or (b) 12 months following the termination of his employment for any other reason and (ii) non-solicitation covenants for a period of 24 months following the termination of his employment with the Company for any reason. Mr. Crage is also subject to an indefinite confidentiality covenant, and the Company and Mr. Crage are subject to indefinite mutual non-disparagement covenants.

For information regarding the termination provisions of the Crage Employment Agreement, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination—Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants—Mr. Crage” below.

Mr. Roddy

In connection with his appointment as our Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer effective June 20, 2016, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Roddy, dated June 14, 2016 and amended as of September 15, 2016 and December 7, 2016 (such employment agreement, as so amended, the “Roddy Employment Agreement”). The Roddy Employment Agreement provides for a three-year term ending on June 20, 2019. During the employment term, Mr. Roddy will serve as Chief Human Resources & Culture Officer of the Company and is entitled to:

In addition, upon his commencement of employment with the Company, Mr. Roddy received a one-time grant of restricted shares of common stock of the Company with a grant date fair value equal to $1,800,000 (the “Roddy Sign-On Restricted Stock Grant”) which will each vest in four equal annual installments over the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.

The Roddy Employment Agreement also provided for a one-time cash sign-on bonus in an amount equal to $200,000, of which 50% was payable on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the commencement of his employment and, 50% payable on June 20, 2017, subject to his continued employment with the Company through such date. In addition, the Roddy Employment Agreement provided that the Company reimburse Mr. Roddy for certain expenses in accordance with the Company’s executive relocation policy.

Pursuant to the terms of the Roddy Employment Agreement, Mr. Roddy is subject to (i) non-competition covenants that apply during his employment and for a period of (a) 24 months following the termination of his employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason during the employment term or (b) 12 months following the termination of his employment for any other reason and (ii) non-solicitation covenants for a period of 24 months following the termination of his employment with the Company for any reason. Mr. Roddy is also subject to an indefinite confidentiality covenant, and the Company and Mr. Roddy are subject to indefinite mutual non-disparagement covenants.

For information regarding the termination provisions of the Roddy Employment Agreement, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination—Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants—Mr. Roddy” below.

52

Ms. Godreau

In connection with her appointment as our Chief Marketing Officer effective January 3, 2017, the Company entered into an offer letter with Ms. Godreau, dated December 28, 2016 and amended as of February 21, 2017 (such offer letter, as so amended, the “Godreau Offer Letter”). The Godreau Offer Letter provides that Ms. Godreau will serve as Chief Marketing Officer of the Company and is entitled to:

In addition, upon her commencement of employment with the Company, Ms. Godreau received a one-time grant of restricted shares of common stock of the Company with a grant date fair value equal to $500,000 which will vest in three equal annual installments over the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to her continued employment through such dates.

For information regarding the termination provisions of the Godreau Offer Letter, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination—Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants—Ms. Godreau” below.

53

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal-Year End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards made to our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.