e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period
from to
Commission file number: 0-21969
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-2725311
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
21090
(Zip Code) |
(410) 865-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at May 29, 2009 |
common stock, $.01 par value
|
|
91,150,128 |
CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
NUMBER |
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the quarters and six months ended April 30, 2008
and April 30, 2009
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the six months ended April 30, 2008 and April 30,
2009
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
59 |
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
$ |
118,849 |
|
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
|
$ |
258,566 |
|
Services |
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
25,352 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
53,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
242,199 |
|
|
|
144,201 |
|
|
|
469,615 |
|
|
|
311,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
141,786 |
|
Services |
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
18,062 |
|
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
114,603 |
|
|
|
83,481 |
|
|
|
225,450 |
|
|
|
179,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
127,596 |
|
|
|
60,720 |
|
|
|
244,165 |
|
|
|
132,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
44,628 |
|
|
|
49,482 |
|
|
|
80,072 |
|
|
|
96,182 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
38,591 |
|
|
|
33,295 |
|
|
|
72,199 |
|
|
|
67,114 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
39,278 |
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
8,760 |
|
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
15,230 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
Restructuring cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
108,629 |
|
|
|
563,688 |
|
|
|
206,779 |
|
|
|
662,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
18,967 |
|
|
|
(502,968 |
) |
|
|
37,386 |
|
|
|
(529,709 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
27,569 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(1,852 |
) |
|
|
(9,219 |
) |
|
|
(3,696 |
) |
Loss on cost method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
25,593 |
|
|
|
(503,882 |
) |
|
|
55,736 |
|
|
|
(528,372 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
(503,210 |
) |
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
$ |
(528,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(5.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(5.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per potential common share |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(5.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(5.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
89,102 |
|
|
|
90,932 |
|
|
|
88,155 |
|
|
|
90,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding |
|
|
110,770 |
|
|
|
90,932 |
|
|
|
110,046 |
|
|
|
90,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
550,669 |
|
|
$ |
583,481 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
366,336 |
|
|
|
482,294 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
138,441 |
|
|
|
116,671 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
93,452 |
|
|
|
91,269 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
35,888 |
|
|
|
26,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,184,786 |
|
|
|
1,300,154 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
156,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
59,967 |
|
|
|
60,099 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
92,249 |
|
|
|
76,319 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
75,748 |
|
|
|
74,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,024,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,511,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
44,761 |
|
|
$ |
32,488 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
96,143 |
|
|
|
95,876 |
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
36,767 |
|
|
|
42,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
179,339 |
|
|
|
174,489 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
37,660 |
|
|
|
35,025 |
|
Long-term restructuring liabilities |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
8,089 |
|
|
|
8,586 |
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
798,000 |
|
|
|
798,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,025,645 |
|
|
|
1,020,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares
authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock par value $0.01; 290,000,000 shares
authorized; 90,470,803 and 91,149,198 shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,629,498 |
|
|
|
5,647,622 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,630,179 |
) |
|
|
(5,158,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
998,949 |
|
|
|
490,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,024,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,511,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
$ |
(528,041 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on marketable securities |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
(904 |
) |
Non-cash loss on cost method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
8,567 |
|
|
|
10,830 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
17,591 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
17,165 |
|
|
|
15,930 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
10,540 |
|
|
|
8,809 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(25,990 |
) |
|
|
21,728 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(20,456 |
) |
|
|
(6,626 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
|
6,253 |
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations |
|
|
7,883 |
|
|
|
(16,371 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(5,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
13,202 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
88,565 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property |
|
|
(14,172 |
) |
|
|
(12,632 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(4,929 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Purchase of available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(719,165 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities |
|
|
762,150 |
|
|
|
239,072 |
|
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,137 |
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(209,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
533,084 |
|
|
|
30,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of 3.75% convertible notes payable |
|
|
(542,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of indebtedness of acquired business |
|
|
(12,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
(used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(550,047 |
) |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
71,602 |
|
|
|
32,827 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
892,061 |
|
|
|
550,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
963,852 |
|
|
$ |
583,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
13,159 |
|
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment in accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
Value of common stock issued in acquisition |
|
$ |
62,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value of vested options assumed in acquisition |
|
$ |
9,912 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial statements included herein for Ciena Corporation (Ciena) have been
prepared by Ciena, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report
reflect all normal recurring adjustments that Ciena considers necessary for the fair statement of
the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of Ciena at
the date of the interim balance sheets. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The
October 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. However, Ciena believes that the disclosures are
adequate to understand the information presented. The operating results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with Cienas audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008.
Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of
October of each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is
described as having ended on October 31, and each fiscal quarter is described as having ended on
January 31, April 30 and July 31 of each fiscal year.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates are used for bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments,
recoverability of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and goodwill, income taxes, warranty
obligations, restructuring liabilities, derivatives and contingencies and litigation. Ciena bases
its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual
results may differ materially from managements estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash collateralizing letters of credits are
included in other current assets and other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the
restriction.
Investments
Cienas investments generally represent investments in marketable debt securities. These
investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Ciena recognizes losses when
it determines that declines in the fair value of its investments, below their cost basis, are
other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, Ciena
considers various factors including market price (when available), investment ratings, the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than Cienas cost basis, and its intent and ability to hold the
investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in market value. Ciena considers all marketable debt securities that it expects to convert to cash
within one year or less to be short-term investments. All others are considered long-term
investments.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost,
which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for excess
and obsolete inventory when an impairment has been identified.
Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures
6
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are
computed using the straight-line method over useful lives of two to five years for equipment,
furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.
Impairments of equipment, furniture and fixtures are determined in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets.
Internal use software and web site development costs are capitalized in accordance with
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use, and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-2, Accounting for
Web Site Development Costs. Qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage,
which consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs, are capitalized
and amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Historically, Ciena has recorded goodwill and purchased intangible assets as a result of
several acquisitions. Ciena accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which requires Ciena to test each reporting units goodwill for impairment on
an annual basis, which Ciena has determined to be the last business day of its fiscal September
each year. Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that
would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
Ciena operates its business and tests its goodwill for impairment as a single reporting unit. As
of April 30, 2009 Ciena had no goodwill remaining on its balance sheet. See Note 4 below.
Purchased finite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization.
Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the economic lives of the respective
assets, generally three to seven years, which approximates the use of the intangible assets.
Impairments of finite-lived intangible assets are determined in accordance with SFAS 144.
Minority Equity Investments
Ciena carries minority equity investments at cost where Ciena owns less than 20% of the voting
equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the company. These
types of investments are inherently high risk investments as the market for technologies or
products manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of investment and such
markets may never be significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all of these
companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in
carrying values when necessary. See Note 7 below.
Concentrations
Substantially all of Cienas cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term
investments in marketable debt securities are maintained at three major U.S. financial
institutions. The majority of Cienas cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Deposits held
with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits
may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes that they bear minimal risk.
Historically, a large percentage of Cienas revenue has been the result of sales to a small
number of communications service providers. Consolidation among Cienas customers has increased
this concentration. Consequently, Cienas accounts receivable are concentrated among these
customers. See Notes 8 and 18 below.
Additionally, Cienas access to certain raw materials is dependent upon sole or limited source
suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill Cienas supply requirements could adversely
affect future results. Ciena relies on a small number of third party manufacturers, principally in
China and Thailand, to perform the majority of the manufacturing for its products. Ciena is
therefore exposed to risks related to the business and financial position of its manufacturers, as
well as risks related to their business continuity and disaster recovery plans, that may adversely
affect access to continued manufacturing capability.
Revenue Recognition
Ciena recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, which states that revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the
following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
7
collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase
orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and
evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. Ciena assesses
whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the
transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses
collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit
checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history. In instances where final acceptance
of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all
acceptance criteria have been met. Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred and
recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed.
Some of Cienas communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is
essential to the functionality of the equipment. Accordingly, Ciena accounts for revenue from such
equipment in accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, (SOP
97-2) and all related interpretations. SOP 97-2 incorporates additional guidance unique to software
arrangements incorporated with general revenue recognition criteria, such as: revenue is recognized
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is
specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, Ciena applies the provisions of SOP
97-2 to determine the amount of the arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of
accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include software are separated into more than one
unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the
undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the
undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered
element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is affected by
Cienas judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement
and Cienas ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect
the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, Ciena applies the provisions of
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
EITF 00-21 allows for separation of elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered
element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of
fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is
probable and substantially in Cienas control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting
based on the relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective
evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition
criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not
met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.
Warranty Accruals
Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the
recognition of the related revenue. Estimated warranty costs include material costs, technical
support labor costs and associated overhead. The warranty liability is included in cost of goods
sold and determined based upon actual warranty cost experience, estimates of component failure
rates and managements industry experience. Cienas sales contracts do not permit the right of
return of product by the customer after the product has been accepted.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts is based on its assessment, on a specific
identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security
from its customers. In determining the appropriate balance for Cienas allowance for doubtful
accounts, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine
collectibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history, account
activity and communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition changes, Ciena
may be required to record an allowance for doubtful accounts, which would negatively affect its
results of operations.
Research and Development
Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense
incurred in research and development include employee compensation, prototype, consulting,
depreciation, facility costs and information technologies.
8
Advertising Costs
Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.
Legal Costs
Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation defense as incurred.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Ciena accounts for share-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123(R), as
interpreted by SAB 107. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation
expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. Ciena estimates
the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. This model is affected by Cienas stock price as well as estimates regarding
a number of variables including expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award
and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value of each
share-based award based on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In
each case, Ciena only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of operations for those
options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest. Ciena uses two attribution methods to
record expense, the straight-line method for grants with only service-based vesting or the
graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, for all other
awards. See Note 16 below.
Income Taxes
Ciena accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS 109 describes an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their
respective tax bases, and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. In estimating future
tax consequences, SFAS 109 generally considers all expected future events other than the enactment
of changes in tax laws or rates. Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of
the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized.
Ciena adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, (FIN 48) at the beginning of fiscal 2008. The amount of
unrecognized tax benefits determined in accordance with FIN 48 increased by $0.2 million during the
second quarter of fiscal 2009 to $5.7 million, which includes $1.2 million of interest and some
minor penalties. All of the uncertain tax positions, if recognized, would decrease the effective
income tax rate.
Ciena has not provided U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of its
non-U.S. affiliates as it plans to permanently reinvest cumulative unremitted foreign earnings
outside the U.S. and it is not practicable to determine the unrecognized deferred income taxes.
These cumulative unremitted foreign earnings relate to ongoing operations in foreign jurisdictions
and are required to fund foreign operations, capital expenditures, and any expansion requirements.
Ciena recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or
release of restricted stock units directly to stockholders equity only when realized. A windfall
tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by Ciena upon an employees disposition of
a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that Ciena
had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been
realized, Ciena follows the tax law with-and-without method. Under the with-and-without method,
the windfall is considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an
incremental benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including Cienas net
operating losses. The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation
awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall
attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where Cienas
net operating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current
years taxable income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.
Loss Contingencies
Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as Cienas ability to reasonably
estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is
accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine
whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
9
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of Cienas cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, and accrued liabilities, approximates fair market value due to the relatively short period
of time to maturity.
For those Ciena assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis,
fair value is determined in accordance with SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which was adopted
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. See Note 7 below. In
accordance with FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, Ciena has
not yet adopted SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities.
For those Ciena assets and liabilities that were not previously required to be measured at
fair value, Ciena has not elected the fair value option in accordance with SFAS No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115.
Foreign Currency
Some of Cienas foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their
functional currency, because Ciena, as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of
these branch offices and subsidiaries with U.S. dollars. For those subsidiaries using the local
currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in
effect at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly
average rate. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of
stockholders equity. Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency of foreign branch offices or
subsidiaries, re-measurement adjustments are recorded in other income. The net gain (loss) on
foreign currency re-measurement and exchange rate changes is immaterial for separate financial
statement presentation.
Derivatives
Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency
transactions relating to operating expenses. These derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges,
have maturities of less than one year and permit net settlement.
At the inception of the cash flow hedge and on an ongoing basis, Ciena assesses the hedging
relationship to determine its effectiveness in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the
hedged risk during the hedge period. The effective portion of the hedging instruments net gain or
loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and
upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the operating
expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Any net gain or loss associated with the
ineffectiveness of the hedging instrument is reported in interest and other income, net. See Note
14 below.
Computation of Basic Net Income (Loss) per Common Share and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Dilutive
Potential Common Share
Ciena calculates earnings (loss) per share (EPS) in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per
Share. This statement requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the
income statement for entities with a complex capital structure and requires a reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations.
Software Development Costs
SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, requires the capitalization of certain software development costs incurred subsequent to
the date technological feasibility is established and prior to the date the product is generally
available for sale. The capitalized cost is then amortized straight-line over the estimated product
life. Ciena defines technological feasibility as being attained at the time a working model is
completed. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the general
availability of such software has been short, and software development costs qualifying for
capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software
development costs.
10
Segment Reporting
SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
annual and interim reporting standards for operating segments and requires certain disclosures
about the products and services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets
and reports revenue, and its major customers. Operating segments are defined as components of an
enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance. Cienas chief operating decision maker is its chief executive
officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of
allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. Ciena has one business activity, and
there are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, operating results and plans
for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, Ciena considers its
business to be in a single reportable segment.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-1, Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair
Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13. This
staff position amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. Also in
February 2008 the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This staff
position delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of
SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active, and provides guidance on the key considerations in
determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not
active. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of these staff positions could have
on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB released three staff positions intended to provide additional guidance
and enhanced disclosure regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP FAS
157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability
Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides
additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS157. FSP FAS 115-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides additional guidance
related to the disclosure of impairment losses on securities and the accounting for impairment
losses on debt securities. FSP 115-2 does not amend existing guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, increases the frequency of fair value
disclosures. All of the staff positions above are effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009 and will be effective for Ciena beginning with its third quarter of fiscal
2009. Ciena believes the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 requires all entities to report
noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Ciena believes the
adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), a revised version of SFAS 141, Business
Combinations. The revision is intended to simplify existing guidance and converge rulemaking under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles with international accounting rules. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations where the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity
may not apply this statement before that date. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of this statement could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Its effect will depend on the nature and significance of any acquisitions subject to this
statement.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This pronouncement requires enhanced disclosures
concerning a companys treatment of costs incurred to renew or extend the term of a recognized
intangible asset. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on its financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
11
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That
May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires that the liability and equity
components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects an issuers
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period the
convertible debt is expected to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. FSP APB
14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Retrospective application to all periods
presented is required except for instruments that were not outstanding during any of the periods
that will be presented in the annual financial statements for the period of adoption but were
outstanding during an earlier period. Cienas existing convertible notes payable do not provide for
settlement in cash upon conversion and Ciena believes the adoption of this statement will not have
a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(3) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On March 3, 2008, Ciena acquired World Wide Packets, Inc. (World Wide Packets or WWP), a
supplier of communications networking equipment that enables the delivery of carrier Ethernet-based
services. Prior to the acquisition, World Wide Packets was a privately held company. Cienas
results of operations in this report include the operations of World Wide Packets beginning on
March 3, 2008, the effective date of the acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations
as if Cienas acquisition of World Wide Packets had been completed as of the beginning of the
period presented. These pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per share data) do not purport to
be indicative of the results that would have been obtained if the acquisition had occurred as of
the beginning of the period presented or that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
242,768 |
|
|
$ |
476,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
18,244 |
|
|
$ |
34,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted net income per potential common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT
Ciena tests its single reporting units goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which
Ciena has determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. Testing is required
between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not,
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on a combination of
factors, including current macroeconomic conditions and a sustained decline in Cienas common stock
price and market capitalization below net book value, Ciena conducted an interim impairment
assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Ciena performed the step one fair
value comparison, and its market capitalization was $721.8 million and its carrying value,
including goodwill, was $949.0 million. Ciena applied a 25% control premium to its market
capitalization to determine a fair value of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that Cienas
fair value was less than its carrying value, Ciena performed the step
two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value of
goodwill requires valuation of a reporting units tangible and
intangible assets and
liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price
in a business combination. If the carrying value of a reporting
units goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed
impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference. The implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill was determined to be $0, and, as a result, Ciena
recorded a goodwill impairment of $455.7 million, representing the full carrying value of the
goodwill. The table below sets forth changes in carrying amount of goodwill for the period
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
455,673 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
(455,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Ciena has previously taken actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with
perceived market opportunities and business conditions. Ciena implemented these restructuring plans
and incurred the associated liability concurrently in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
12
On March 2, 2009, Ciena committed to certain restructuring actions and subsequently effected a
headcount reduction of approximately 200 employees, representing 9% of its global workforce.
Headcount reductions were implemented across Cienas organizations and geographies, with the timing
and scope of such reductions varying by country based on local legal requirements. These headcount
reductions are expected to be completed during the third fiscal quarter of 2009. Restructuring
charges during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 include severance and other employee-related costs
of approximately $3.5 million related to this restructuring activity. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, Ciena also recorded additional charges of $2.9 million related to costs associated
with previously restructured facilities.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, Ciena recorded a restructuring charge of $0.1 million
related to one-time termination benefits.
The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability
accounts for the six months ended April 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction |
|
|
facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
3,243 |
|
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
Additional liability recorded |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(2,460 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(2,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,097 |
|
|
$ |
5,766 |
|
|
$ |
7,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
2,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
3,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,712 |
|
|
$ |
4,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability
accounts for the six months ended April 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
facilities |
|
Balance at October 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
4,688 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6) MARKETABLE SECURITIES
As of the dates indicated, short-term and long-term investments are comprised of the following
(in thousands):
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
481,496 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
481,746 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
481,746 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
482,294 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
481,746 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
116,531 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
$ |
114,352 |
|
Asset-backed obligations |
|
|
10,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
49,871 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
49,870 |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
|
334,195 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
335,104 |
|
Certificate of deposit |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
522,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
366,054 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
366,336 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
157,731 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
156,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
522,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses related to marketable debt investments were primarily due to changes
in interest rates. Cienas management has determined that the gross unrealized losses at April 30,
2009 are temporary in nature because Ciena has the ability and intent to hold these investments
until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. As of the dates indicated, gross unrealized
losses were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less |
|
|
Unrealized Losses 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than 12 Months |
|
|
Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
239,901 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
239,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
239,901 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
239,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less |
|
|
Unrealized Losses 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than 12 Months |
|
|
Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
$ |
88,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
$ |
88,176 |
|
Asset-backed obligations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
29,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
29,709 |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
23,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
23,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
151,504 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
151,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes final legal maturities of debt investments at April 30, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
481,496 |
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
Due in 1-2 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2-3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
481,496 |
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
(7) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. SFAS 157 establishes a
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs for fair value measurement. This hierarchy
prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less
active markets or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument; |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on Cienas assumptions used to measure
assets and liabilities at fair value. |
By distinguishing between inputs that are observable in the marketplace, and therefore more
objective, and those that are unobservable and therefore more subjective, the hierarchy is designed
to indicate the relative reliability of the fair value measurements. A financial asset or
liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
As of the dates indicated, the following tables summarize the fair value of assets and
liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cienas Level 1 assets include corporate equity securities publicly traded on major exchanges
that are valued using quoted prices in active markets. Cienas Level 2 investments include U.S.
government obligations. These investments are valued using observable inputs such as quoted market
prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with
reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments are held by a custodian who obtains
investment prices from a third party pricing provider that uses standard inputs to models which
vary by asset class.
As of April 20, 2009, Ciena did not hold financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value basen on Level 3 inputs.
As of the dates indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Cienas
condensed consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
482,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets measured at fair value |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
482,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
482,044 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
482,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, a private technology company, in which Ciena holds a
minority equity investment, merged with another private technology company. This event required
Ciena to perform an impairment analysis and measure the investment at fair value. In determining
its fair value, Ciena utilized Level 3 inputs including recapitalization of the combined company in
connection with the merger and the terms of a subsequent round of financing offered by the merged
company. As a result, Ciena recorded a non-cash loss on cost method investments of $2.5 million
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
15
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, a separate private technology company, in which Ciena
held a minority equity investment, was acquired by a publicly-traded company. This event required
Ciena to perform an impairment analysis and measure the investment at fair value. In determining
its fair value, Ciena utilized Level 2 inputs including the relevant exchange ratio for the
acquisition transaction and the market price of the acquirors common stock. As a result, Ciena
recorded a non-cash loss on cost method investments of $0.6 million during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009.
(8) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, three customers accounted for 59.0% and 46.7% of
net accounts receivable, respectively.
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on managements assessment, on a
specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts, and as of October 31,
2008 and April 30, 2009 was $0.1 million.
(9) INVENTORIES
As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,044 |
|
|
$ |
20,538 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
91,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,709 |
|
|
|
113,407 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(23,257 |
) |
|
|
(22,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,452 |
|
|
$ |
91,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an
amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value, based
on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During the first six months of fiscal
2009, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $8.8 million, primarily
related to changes in forecasted sales for certain products. Deductions from the provision for
excess and obsolete inventory generally relate to disposal activities. The following table
summarizes the activity in Cienas reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the period
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
23,257 |
|
Provision for excess for obsolescence |
|
|
8,809 |
|
Actual inventory disposed |
|
|
(9,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
22,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of fiscal 2008, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and
obsolete inventory of $10.5 million, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain
products. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory generally relate to
disposal activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas reserve for excess and
obsolete inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
26,170 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence |
|
|
10,540 |
|
Actual inventory disposed |
|
|
(10,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
26,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
16
(10) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
$ |
2,082 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
Prepaid VAT and other taxes |
|
|
15,160 |
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
Deferred deployment expense |
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
10,557 |
|
|
|
10,229 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Other non-trade receivables |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,888 |
|
|
$ |
26,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
As of the dates indicated, equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
$ |
286,940 |
|
|
$ |
291,619 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
40,574 |
|
|
|
43,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,514 |
|
|
|
334,825 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(267,547 |
) |
|
|
(274,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,967 |
|
|
$ |
60,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of the dates indicated, other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
185,833 |
|
|
$ |
(128,255 |
) |
|
$ |
57,578 |
|
|
$ |
185,833 |
|
|
$ |
(137,880 |
) |
|
$ |
47,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and licenses |
|
|
47,370 |
|
|
|
(37,952 |
) |
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
47,370 |
|
|
|
(40,596 |
) |
|
|
6,774 |
|
Customer
relationships,
covenants not to
compete,
outstanding
purchase orders and
contracts |
|
|
68,281 |
|
|
|
(43,028 |
) |
|
|
25,253 |
|
|
|
68,281 |
|
|
|
(46,689 |
) |
|
|
21,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301,484 |
|
|
$ |
(209,235 |
) |
|
$ |
92,249 |
|
|
$ |
301,484 |
|
|
$ |
(225,165 |
) |
|
$ |
76,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets was $17.2 million and $15.9
million for the first six months of fiscal 2008 and 2009, respectively. Expected future
amortization of other intangible assets for the fiscal years indicated is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Period ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
15,499 |
|
2010 |
|
|
27,872 |
|
2011 |
|
|
13,852 |
|
2012 |
|
|
9,473 |
|
2013 |
|
|
7,217 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
17
(13) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Maintenance spares inventory, net |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
33,426 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
15,127 |
|
|
|
13,980 |
|
Investments in privately held companies |
|
|
6,671 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
20,436 |
|
|
|
21,052 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,748 |
|
|
$ |
74,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight line method which approximates
the effect of the effective interest rate method on the maturity of the related debt. Amortization
of debt issuance costs, which is included in interest expense, was $1.7 million and $1.1 million
during the first six months of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Warranty |
|
$ |
37,258 |
|
|
$ |
38,883 |
|
Compensation, payroll related tax and benefits |
|
|
35,200 |
|
|
|
30,932 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,002 |
|
|
|
23,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,143 |
|
|
$ |
95,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas accrued warranty for the fiscal periods
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end |
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Provisions |
|
Settlements |
|
of period |
2008 |
|
$ |
33,580 |
|
|
$ |
7,083 |
|
|
$ |
(4,829 |
) |
|
$ |
35,834 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
37,258 |
|
|
$ |
9,235 |
|
|
$ |
(7,610 |
) |
|
$ |
38,883 |
|
As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Products |
|
$ |
13,061 |
|
|
$ |
14,401 |
|
Services |
|
|
61,366 |
|
|
|
63,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,427 |
|
|
|
77,999 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(36,767 |
) |
|
|
(42,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
$ |
37,660 |
|
|
$ |
35,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) DERIVATIVES
Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar
denominated operating expenses. Ciena uses these derivatives to partially offset its market
exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. These derivatives are designated as cash
flow hedges and have maturities of less than one year. These forward contracts are not designed to
provide foreign currency protection over the long-term. Ciena considers several factors, including
offsetting exposures, significance of exposures, costs associated with entering into a particular
instrument, and potential effectiveness when designing its hedging activities.
The effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction,
is subsequently reclassified into the
operating expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Ciena records the
ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in interest and other income, net.
18
Cienas foreign currency forward contracts are classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified
to Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Effective
Portion) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Research and
development |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
in Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at April 30, 2009 are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Designated as Cash |
|
Weighted Average Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Asset |
|
|
Derivative Liability |
|
|
Derivative Asset/(Liability) |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
Exchange Rate |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Instruments under |
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
SFAS 133 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
USD Functional Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive EUR / Pay
USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,592 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,009 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,009 |
) |
Receive INR / Pay
USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0206 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
Receive CAD / Pay
USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8252 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
EUR Functional Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive GBP / Pay
EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,470 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
654 |
(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
654 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,275 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(442 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair value translated at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount is included within accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
(15) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCULATION
The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator of the basic net income (loss) per common share (Basic EPS) and the
diluted net income (loss) per dilutive potential common share (Diluted EPS). Basic EPS is
computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed
using the weighted average number of (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable upon
vesting of restricted stock units, (iii) shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock
options, employee stock purchase plan options and warrants using the treasury stock method; and
(iv) shares underlying the 0.25% and 0.875% convertible senior notes.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Numerator |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
(503,210 |
) |
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
$ |
(528,041 |
) |
Add: Interest expense for 0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Interest expense for 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) used to calculate Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
25,618 |
|
|
$ |
(503,210 |
) |
|
$ |
56,243 |
|
|
$ |
(528,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Denominator |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
89,102 |
|
|
|
90,932 |
|
|
|
88,155 |
|
|
|
90,777 |
|
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options,
employees stock purchase plan options, warrants and
restricted stock units |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
110,770 |
|
|
|
90,932 |
|
|
|
110,046 |
|
|
|
90,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
EPS |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(5.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(5.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(5.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(5.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation of Shares Excluded due to Anti-Dilutive Effect
For the quarter and six months ended April 30, 2008, the weighted average number of shares set
forth in the table below, underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan
options, restricted stock units, and warrants, is considered anti-dilutive because the exercise
price of these equity awards is greater than the average per share closing price on the NASDAQ
Stock Market during this period. In addition, for the six months ended April 30, 2008 the weighted
average number of shares underlying Cienas previously outstanding 3.75% convertible notes, which
were repaid at maturity on February 1, 2008, is considered anti-dilutive pursuant to SFAS 128
because the related interest expense on a per common share if converted basis exceeds Basic EPS
for the period.
For the quarter and six months ended April 30, 2009, the weighted average number of shares set
forth in the table below, underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan
options, restricted stock units, and warrants, is considered anti-dilutive because Ciena incurred a
net loss. In addition, the shares, representing the weighted average number of shares issuable upon
conversion of Cienas 0.25% convertible senior notes and Cienas 0.875% convertible senior notes,
are considered anti-dilutive pursuant to SFAS 128 because the related interest expense on a per
common share if converted basis exceeds Basic EPS for the period.
The following table summarizes the shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for
Basic and Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Shares excluded from EPS Denominator due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Shares
underlying stock options, restricted stock units and warrants |
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
7,992 |
|
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
3.75% convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
28,639 |
|
|
|
4,357 |
|
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
Ciena makes equity awards under its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2008 Plan) and 2003
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). These plans were approved by shareholders and are described
in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K.
20
2008 Plan
Ciena grants stock options and restricted stock units under the 2008 Plan. As of April 30,
2009, there were 2.8 million shares authorized and available for issuance thereunder.
Stock Options
Outstanding stock option awards to employees are generally subject to service-based vesting
restrictions and vest incrementally over a four-year period. The following table is a summary of
Cienas stock option activity for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
$ |
48.84 |
|
Granted |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
1.91 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
53.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2009 |
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
$ |
47.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first six months of fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2009, was $12.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The weighted average fair values of
each stock option granted by Ciena during the first six months of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 were
$16.95 and $4.26, respectively.
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at April
30, 2009, based on Cienas closing stock price of $11.98 per share on the last trading day of
Cienas second fiscal quarter of 2009 (shares and intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
|
|
Vested Options at April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Exercise |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.52 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
$ |
10.28 |
|
|
$ |
3,374 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
|
$ |
11.58 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
$ |
16.53 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.43 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
17.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
17.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
21.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
21.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.97 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
31.71 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
29.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
29.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31.72 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.97 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
39.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
40.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.98 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
83.13 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
60.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
60.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
83.14 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
160.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
160.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
$ |
47.93 |
|
|
$ |
3,374 |
|
|
|
4,756 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
54.23 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions for Option-Based Awards
Ciena recognizes the fair value of service-based options as share-based compensation expense
on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option award on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
53.0% |
|
|
65.0% |
|
|
|
53.0% |
|
|
|
65.0% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.7% - 3.2% |
|
|
2.1% - 2.4% |
|
|
|
2.7% - 3.6% |
|
|
|
1.7% - 2.4% |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
5.1 - 5.3 |
|
|
5.2 - 5.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 - 5.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 - 5.3 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
21
Consistent with SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107, Ciena considered the implied volatility and
historical volatility of its stock price in determining its expected volatility, and, finding both
to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both would result in the best estimate of
expected volatility.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for
the expected term of Cienas employee stock options.
The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding. As prescribed by SAB 107, Cienas expected term is
based on specific exercise behavior of its historical grantees.
The dividend yield assumption is based on Cienas history of not making dividends and its
expectation of future dividend payouts.
Because share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are
ultimately expected to vest, the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized reflects a
reduction for estimated forfeitures. Ciena estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises
those estimates in subsequent periods based upon new or changed information. Ciena relies upon
historical experience in establishing forfeiture rates. If actual forfeitures differ from current
estimates, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes
in estimated forfeitures.
Restricted Stock Units
A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena
common stock as the unit vests. Cienas outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to
service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a three to four year period. Awards with
performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain operational, financial or
other performance criteria or targets as a condition of vesting, or acceleration of vesting, of
such awards.
Cienas outstanding restricted stock units include performance-accelerated restricted stock
units (PARS), which vest in full four years after the date of grant (assuming that the grantee is
still employed by Ciena at that time). At the beginning of each of the first three fiscal years
following the date of grant, the Compensation Committee establishes one-year performance targets
which, if satisfied, provide for the acceleration of vesting of one-third of the award. As a
result, the grantee has the opportunity, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions, to vest
as to the entire award in three years. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of
performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance
period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based
upon Cienas determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved.
At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and
the performance period required to meet those targets.
The aggregate intrinsic value of Cienas restricted stock units is based on Cienas closing
stock price on the last trading day of each period as indicated. The following table is a summary
of Cienas restricted stock unit activity for the periods indicated, with the aggregate intrinsic
value of the balance outstanding at the end of each period, based on Cienas closing stock price on
the last trading day of the relevant period (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
Units Outstanding |
|
Value Per Share |
|
Value |
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
$ |
30.85 |
|
|
$ |
17,773 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2009 |
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
$ |
14.86 |
|
|
$ |
55,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common
stock during the first six months fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 was $11.3 million and $3.8 million,
respectively. The weighted average fair value of each restricted stock unit granted by Ciena during
the first six months of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 was $31.99 and $6.96, respectively.
22
Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is estimated using the intrinsic value
method, which is based on the closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for
service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, ratably
over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated
forfeitures, is recognized ratably over the performance period based upon Cienas determination of
whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period,
Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period
required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved
involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of
achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is
changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized
against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP is a non-compensatory plan under FAS 123(R) and issuances thereunder do not result in
share-based compensation expense. The following table is a summary of ESPP activity and shares
available for issuance for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESPP shares available |
|
Intrinsic value |
|
|
for issuance |
|
at exercise date |
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreen provision |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued March 16, 2009 |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense for Periods Reported
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Product costs |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
Service costs |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in cost of sales |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
5,383 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
5,388 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in operating expense |
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
13,391 |
|
|
|
15,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory, net |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
$ |
8,871 |
|
|
$ |
9,097 |
|
|
$ |
15,752 |
|
|
$ |
17,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 30, 2009, total unrecognized compensation expense was: (i) $16.0 million, which
relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.2 years; and (ii) $55.8 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
23
(17) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
(503,210 |
) |
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
$ |
(528,041 |
) |
Change in
unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
1,677 |
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
Change in accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
23,734 |
|
|
$ |
(501,400 |
) |
|
$ |
54,366 |
|
|
$ |
(526,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18) ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of revenue based on the location
of the purchaser, with any country accounting for greater than 10% of total revenue in the period
specifically identified. Revenue attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States
and the United Kingdom is reflected as Other International revenue. For the periods below, Cienas
geographic distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
169,373 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
91,700 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
$ |
338,891 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
190,647 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
36,559 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
59,741 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
45,298 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Other International |
|
|
36,267 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
33,920 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
70,983 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
75,656 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
144,201 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
311,601 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and
fixtures, with any country attributable for greater than 10% of total equipment, furniture and
fixtures specifically identified. Equipment, furniture and fixtures attributable to geographic
regions outside of the United States are reflected as International. For the periods below,
Cienas geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures was as follows (in thousands,
except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
49,351 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
$ |
48,154 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
International |
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
11,945 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,967 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
60,099 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total equipment, furniture and fixtures |
For the periods below, Cienas distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except
percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
Optical service delivery |
|
$ |
203,167 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
105,504 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
$ |
393,720 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
235,695 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
Carrier Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Services |
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
25,352 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
53,035 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
144,201 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
311,601 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
24
For the periods below, customers accounting for at least 10% of Cienas revenue were as
follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,880 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company B |
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,140 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
33,239 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Company C |
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company D |
|
|
67,914 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
40,105 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
129,692 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
72,661 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,668 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
$ |
40,105 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
$ |
236,712 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
$ |
105,900 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
(19) CONTINGENCIES
Foreign Tax Contingencies
Ciena has received assessment notices from the Mexican tax authorities asserting deficiencies
in payments between 2001 and 2005 related primarily to income taxes and import taxes and duties.
Ciena has filed judicial petitions appealing these assessments. As of October 31, 2008 and April
30, 2009, Ciena had accrued liabilities of $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to
these contingencies, which are reported as a component of other current accrued liabilities. As of
April 30, 2009, Ciena estimates that it could be exposed to possible losses of up to $5.8 million,
for which it has not accrued liabilities. Ciena has not accrued the additional income tax
liabilities because it does not believe that such losses are more likely than not to be incurred.
Ciena has not accrued the additional import taxes and duties because it does not believe the
incurrence of such losses is probable. Ciena continues to evaluate the likelihood of probable and
reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these assessments. As a result, future increases or
decreases to accrued liabilities may be necessary and will be recorded in the period when such
amounts are probable and estimable.
Litigation
On November 7, 2008, JDS Uniphase Corp. (JDSU) filed a complaint with the United States
International Trade Commission (ITC) against Ciena and several other respondents, alleging
infringement of two patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,658,035 and 6,687,278) relating to tunable laser
chip technology. The complaint, which names Ciena as a company whose products incorporate the
accused technology manufactured by certain other respondents and which technology is imported into
the United States, seeks a determination and relief under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. On
December 17, 2008, Ciena and certain other respondents entered into a Settlement Agreement and
Agreement to be Bound with JDSU, whereby those respondents agreed, in exchange for dismissal from
the investigation, to be bound by any exclusion order issued by the ITC in the investigation in
favor of JDSU that takes effect against one or more of the non-settling respondents. Ciena was not
required to make any payment in connection with this settlement agreement. Based on that agreement,
JDSU contemporaneously filed a motion to terminate the investigation with respect to Ciena and
certain other respondents. Based on
the ITC staffs initial response to that motion, the parties entered into an amended settlement
agreement and, on January 8, 2009, JDSU filed an amended motion to terminate. On February 3, 2009,
the ITC judge issued an order granting JDSUs amended motion to terminate, which order was affirmed
by the full commission on February 27, 2009. Accordingly, the ITC investigation has been terminated
with respect to Ciena.
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things,
that certain of the parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the 673 Patent), relating
to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks
injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to
the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and
counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 24, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an
application for inter partes reexamination of the 673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. On the same date, Ciena and the other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending
reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit, which motion is pending with the court. Ciena believes
that it has valid defenses to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously.
On January 31, 2008, Ciena Corporation and Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company
(previously named Litton Systems, Inc.) entered into an agreement to settle patent litigation
between the parties pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Ciena made a $7.7 million payment and agreed to
indemnify the plaintiff, should it be unable to collect compensatory damages awarded, if any, in a
final judgment in its favor against a specified Ciena supplier. This obligation is specific to this
litigation and, while there is no maximum amount payable, Cienas obligation is limited to
plaintiffs collection of that portion of any compensatory damages award that relates to the
suppliers sale of infringing products to Ciena. Ciena has determined the fair value of this
guarantee to be insignificant.
25
As a result of its June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., Ciena became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering (IPO) as defendants and alleges, among other things,
that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged
compensation arrangements in ONIs registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices
to artificially inflate the ONIs stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI
and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters
alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been
dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than
300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have
been included in a single coordinated proceeding. No specific amount of damages has been claimed in
this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, Ciena cannot accurately predict the
ultimate outcome of the matter at this time.
In addition to
the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Ciena does not expect that
the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report
discuss future events or expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial
condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, or state other forward-looking
information. Cienas forward-looking information is based on various factors and was derived
using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by
words like may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, potential or continue or the negative of those words and other comparable words.
You should be aware that these statements only reflect our current predictions and beliefs. These
statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual
events or results may differ materially. Important factors that could cause our actual results to
be materially different from the forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report,
particularly in Item 1A Risk Factors of Part II of this report below. You should review these
risk factors and the rest of this quarterly report in combination with the more detailed
description of our business and managements discussion and analysis of financial condition in our
annual report on Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
23, 2008, for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in Cienas
securities. Ciena undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a provider of communications networking equipment, software and services that support
the transport, switching,
aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Our optical service delivery and
carrier Ethernet service delivery products are used, individually or as part of an integrated
solution, in networks operated by communications service providers, cable operators, governments
and enterprises around the globe. We are a network specialist, targeting the transition of
disparate, legacy communications networks to converged, next-generation architectures, better able
to handle increased traffic and deliver more efficiently a broader mix of high-bandwidth
communications services. Our products, along with our service-aware operating system and unified
service and transport management, enable service providers to efficiently and cost-effectively
deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Together with our
professional support and consulting services, our product offering seeks to address holistically
the business and network needs of our customers. By improving network productivity, reducing
operating costs and enabling new and integrated service offerings, we create business and
operational value for our customers.
Our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on Form 10-K and current reports on Form
8-K filed with the SEC are available through the SECs website at www.sec.gov or free of charge on our
website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these documents. We routinely post the
reports above, recent news and announcements, financial results and other important information
about Ciena on our website at www.ciena.com.
Effect of Current Market Conditions
Our business and results of operations continue to suffer negative effects of ongoing
difficult macroeconomic conditions, further exacerbated by customer-specific challenges and
significant disruptions in the financial and credit markets globally. In response to market
conditions, many companies, including some of our largest communications service provider
26
customers, have slowed spending and indicated their intention to reduce overall capital
expenditures as compared to last year. As a result, we have experienced order delays, lengthening
sales cycles and slowing deployments in recent quarters, resulting in lower demand across our
customer base in all geographies.
These conditions have negatively affected our revenue and earnings in recent quarters. Revenue
for the first six months of fiscal 2009 was $311.6 million in comparison to $469.6 million for the
same period in fiscal 2008. We expect our revenue for fiscal 2009 to be significantly lower than
our fiscal 2008 results and we will not be profitable for the year. The magnitude of the effect of
current market conditions on our results of operations is difficult to predict and significantly
linked to the duration and severity of the economic downturn and the resulting level of capital
expenditure by our largest customers.
Strategy
Despite ongoing macroeconomic challenges, we continue to believe in our longer-term market
opportunities and the potential represented by the underlying drivers of future demand in our
target markets. We believe growing consumer and enterprise use of, and increased dependence upon, a
variety of broadband applications and services, will continue to consume bandwidth, requiring our
customers to invest in their networks and transition to more efficient, robust and economical
network architectures. As a result, we intend to continue to invest in our business, prioritizing
spending on key product and technology initiatives that we believe will strategically position us
for longer-term growth when we emerge from this challenging period. Specifically, our ongoing
development is focused upon the evolution of our CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switch family,
the expansion of our carrier Ethernet service delivery and aggregation products, and the extension
of our CN 4200 FlexSelect Advanced Service Platform, including 100G technologies and
capabilities. Illustrative of the execution of this strategy, in May 2009, we announced plans to
implement our first 100G network for NYSE Euronexts new state-of-the-art data centers in the
greater New York and London metropolitan areas.
Our broader development initiatives remain focused on delivering upon our vision of
transforming networks to adapt and scale, manage unpredictability and eliminate barriers to new
service offerings. This vision of simplified, highly-automated networks is based on the following
technologies:
|
|
|
Programmable network elements, including software-programmable hardware platforms and
interfaces that use our FlexiPort technology, to enable on-demand and automated support for
multiple services and applications; |
|
|
|
|
Common service-aware operating system and unified transport and service management
software for an integrated solution ensuring all network elements work seamlessly together
for rapid delivery of services and applications; and |
|
|
|
|
Optimized carrier Ethernet technology our True
Carrier Ethernet for enhanced
management, faster provisioning, higher reliability and support for a wider variety of
services. |
Through these capabilities, we seek to enable customers to automate delivery and management of a
broad mix of services over networks that offer enhanced flexibility and are more cost-effective to
deploy, scale and manage.
Restructuring Activities
During this period of macroeconomic weakness, we intend to manage our workforce and operating
costs carefully to ensure that they are aligned with our business and market opportunities. During
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we took action to effect a headcount reduction of approximately
200 employees or 9% of our global workforce, with headcount reductions implemented across our
organizations and geographies. As part of this action, we will also close our Acton, Massachusetts
research and development facility on or about June 30, 2009. We expect these steps will help better
align our operating expense with market opportunities and the development strategy above. In
connection with these actions, we incurred a $3.5 million charge during our second quarter of fiscal
2009, principally consisting of employee-related restructuring expense. We also incurred a $2.9
million restructuring charge related to the revision of previous estimates for restructured
facilities. We also expect to incur employee-related restructuring
charges of approximately $0.5 million and
facilities-related restructuring charges, primarily related to remaining lease payments, of
approximately $2.0 million to $4.0 million during the third fiscal quarter of 2009.
Goodwill Impairment
Based on a combination of factors, including current macroeconomic conditions described above
and a sustained decline in our common stock price and market capitalization below our net book
value, we conducted an interim impairment assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. The conclusion of this assessment was the write-off of all goodwill remaining on our
balance sheet, resulting in an impairment charge of $455.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2009. This impairment charge significantly affected our operating expense and operating and net
loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The impairment charge above will not result in any
current or future cash expenditures.
27
Acquisition of World Wide Packets
On March 3, 2008, we completed our acquisition of World Wide Packets, Inc. (WWP), a provider
of communications network equipment that enables the cost-effective delivery of a variety of
carrier Ethernet-based services. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 1 of Part I of this report for additional information related to this acquisition.
Financial Results
We experienced the year-over-year and sequential revenue declines set forth below primarily as
a result of the market conditions described above and the resulting
decrease in demand across our customer base.
|
|
|
Revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was $144.2 million, representing a 14%
sequential decrease from $167.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and a 41%
decrease from $242.2 million in second quarter of fiscal 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Revenue from the U.S. for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was $91.7 million, a
decrease from $98.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and $169.4 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2008; |
|
|
|
|
International revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2009
was $52.5 million, a decrease from
$68.5 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $72.8 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenue, international revenue was 36.4% during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, a decrease from 40.9% in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and an increase from
30.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. |
In recent quarters our international composition of revenue has been higher than historical
periods. This reflects our continued investments in our EMEA operations, as well as the effect of
significant reductions in spending by our largest, U.S.-based communications service provider
customers as a result of the economic downturn. International revenue, measured in dollars has been
negatively affected by the global market conditions described above as well as the strengthening of
the U.S. dollar in recent periods.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2009, one customer accounted for 27.8% of revenue, as
compared to our first quarter of 2009, when three customers accounted for greater than 10% of
revenue and 40.8% in the aggregate.
Gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was 42.1%, down from 42.9% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, and 52.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Gross margin for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 was negatively affected by charges of approximately $5.8 million related to
two committed customer sales contracts that result in a negative gross margin on the initial phases
of the customers deployment. The charges relate to a contract with a new large carrier customer in
a new geography for our sales, and another contract to secure a new market opportunity with an
existing international carrier customer. Part of our strategy is to focus on the growth and
diversification of our customer base, including through an expansion of our global footprint
outside of our traditional markets in North America and Western Europe. As we have sought to
execute on this strategy and displace incumbent equipment vendors, we have experienced greater
pricing pressure, particularly for our core transport products.
Operating expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was $563.7 million, an increase from
$98.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and $108.6 million for the second quarter of
fiscal 2008. Exclusive of the goodwill impairment and restructuring charges described above,
operating expense for the second quarter increased by $3.0 million sequentially. This increase was
primarily related to research and development expense to fund the development initiatives and
strategy described above.
Our loss from operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was $503.0 million. This
compares to a $26.7 million loss from operations during the first quarter of 2009 and $19.0 million
in income from operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Our net loss for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 was $503.2 million, or $5.53 per share. This compares to a net loss of $24.8
million, or $0.27 per share, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
We generated $2.9 million in cash from operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
consisting of the use of $12.4 million in cash from net income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and
$15.3 million in net cash generated from changes in working capital. This compares with a use of
$0.9 million in cash from operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2009, consisting of $5.9
million in cash generated from net income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and a $6.8 million net use of cash
resulting from changes in working capital.
28
At April 30, 2009, we had $583.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and $482.3 million of
short-term investments in marketable debt securities.
As of April 30, 2009, head count was 2,104, a decrease from 2,238 at January 31, 2009 and
2,119 at April 30, 2008.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the first six months and second quarter of fiscal 2008 only
include the operations of World Wide Packets after the March 3, 2008 acquisition date.
Revenue
We derive revenue from sales of our products and services, which we discuss in the following
three major groupings:
|
1. |
|
Optical Service Delivery. Included in product revenue, this revenue grouping
reflects sales of our transport and switching products and legacy data networking
products and related software. This revenue grouping was previously referred to as our
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. |
|
|
2. |
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery. Included in product revenue, this revenue
grouping reflects sales of our service delivery and aggregation switches, Ethernet
access products, broadband access products, and the related software. |
|
|
3. |
|
Services. Included in services revenue are sales of installation, deployment,
maintenance support, consulting and training activities. |
The nature of our business exposes us to the likelihood of quarterly fluctuations in revenue.
A sizable portion of our revenue continues to come from sales to a small number of communications
service providers for large network builds. As a result, our revenues are closely tied to the
prospects, performance, and financial condition of our largest customers and are significantly
affected by market-wide changes, including reductions in enterprise and consumer spending, that
affect the businesses and level of infrastructure-related spending by communications service
providers. Moreover, these network projects are generally characterized by large and sporadic
equipment orders and contract terms that can result in the recognition or deferral of significant
amounts of revenue in a given quarter. The timing of such orders and recognition of the related
revenue can be difficult to predict. We expect this high level of revenue concentration among a
small number of large communications service provider customers to continue. This concentration of
revenue increases our risk of quarterly fluctuations in revenue and operating results and can
exacerbate our exposure to reductions in spending or changes in network strategy involving one or
more of our significant customers.
Given current macroeconomic conditions and the effect of lower demand in recent quarters, as
well as changes in the mix of our revenue toward products with shorter customer lead times, the
percentage of our quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter has increased in
comparison to prior periods. Lower levels of backlog and an increase in the percentage of quarterly
revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter could result in more variability and less
predictability in our quarterly results.
Cost of Goods Sold
Product cost of goods sold consists primarily of amounts paid to third-party contract
manufacturers, component costs, direct compensation costs and overhead, shipping and logistics
costs associated with manufacturing-related operations, warranty and other contractual obligations,
royalties, license fees, amortization of intangible assets, cost of excess and obsolete inventory
and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.
Services cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and third-party costs, including
personnel costs, associated with provision of services including installation, deployment,
maintenance support, consulting and training activities, and, when applicable, estimated losses on
committed customer contracts.
Gross Margin
Gross margin continues to be susceptible to quarterly fluctuation due to a number of factors.
Product gross margin can vary significantly depending upon the mix of products and customers in a
given fiscal quarter. Gross margin can also be affected by volume of orders, our ability to drive
product cost reductions, geographic mix, the level of pricing pressure we
encounter, our introduction of new products or entry into new markets, any significant
liquidated damages due to performance problems or delays, charges for excess and obsolete inventory
and changes in warranty costs.
29
Service gross margin can be
affected by the mix of customers and services, particularly the
mix between deployment and maintenance services, geographic mix and the timing and extent of any
investments in internal resources to support this business.
Operating Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense
(including share-based compensation expense), prototype costs relating to design, development,
testing of our products, and third-party consulting costs.
Sales and marketing expense primarily consists of salaries, commissions and related employee
expense (including share-based compensation expense), and sales and
marketing support expense,
including travel, demonstration units, trade show expense, and third-party consulting costs.
General and administrative expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense
(including share-based compensation expense), and costs for third-party consulting and other
services.
Amortization of intangible assets primarily reflects purchased technology and customer
relationships, from our acquisitions.
Three months ended April 30, 2008 compared to three months ended April 30, 2009
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
$ |
118,849 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
(97,332 |
) |
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
Services |
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
25,352 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
144,201 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
(97,998 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
(30,622 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
Services |
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
18,062 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
114,603 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
83,481 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
(31,122 |
) |
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
127,596 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
$ |
60,720 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
$ |
(66,876 |
) |
|
|
(52.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
30
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
118,849 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(97,332 |
) |
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
(30,622 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
120,140 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
53,430 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
$ |
(66,710 |
) |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
26,018 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
25,352 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
18,062 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,290 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in distribution
of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Optical service delivery |
|
$ |
203,167 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
105,504 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
$ |
(97,663 |
) |
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Services |
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
25,352 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
144,201 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(97,998 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as
International in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands,
except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United States |
|
$ |
169,373 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
91,700 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
$ |
(77,673 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
International |
|
|
72,826 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
52,501 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
(20,325 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
144,201 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(97,998 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in
thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company B |
|
$ |
31,132 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company C |
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company D |
|
|
67,914 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
40,105 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,668 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
$ |
40,105 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue decreased primarily due to a $97.7 million decrease in sales of our
optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects
decreases of $40.7 million in sales of core switching products, $32.1 million in sales of
core transport products, $12.8 million in sales of our CN 4200 FlexSelect Advanced
Service Platform and $12.1 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro transport
products. |
|
|
|
|
Services revenue remained relatively flat. |
|
|
|
|
United States revenue decreased primarily due to a $76.4 million decrease in sales of
our optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects
decreases of $35.5 million in sales of core transport products, $32.8 million in sales of
core switching products and $7.5 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro
transport products. |
|
|
|
|
International revenue decreased primarily due to a $21.3 million decrease in sales of
our optical service delivery products. This reflects a decrease of
$12.2 million in sales
of CN 4200, $7.9 million in sales of core switching products and
$4.6 million of legacy
data networking and metro products, partially offset by a $3.4 million increase in sales of our core transport
products. |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased due to less favorable product and
geographic mix, including fewer sales of core switching products as a percentage of total
revenue, increased charges related to losses on committed customer sales contracts and
higher charges relating to warranty. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased due to less
favorable product and geographic mix, increased charges related to losses on committed
customer sales contracts and higher charges relating to warranty. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue remained largely unchanged
year-over-year. |
Operating expense
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
44,628 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
49,482 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
38,591 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
33,295 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(5,296 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
8,760 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
Restructuring cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
316.0 |
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
108,629 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
563,688 |
|
|
|
390.8 |
|
|
$ |
455,059 |
|
|
|
418.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense benefitted by $1.7 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.
The resulting $4.9 million net change reflects a $3.6 million increase |
32
|
|
|
in prototype expense related to the development initiatives described above. The increase also reflects
increases of $2.3 million in employee compensation cost, primarily due to increased
headcount, $1.5 million in facilities and information systems expense, and $1.0 million in
depreciation expense. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.6 million
in consulting services expense. |
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense benefitted by $0.6 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates primarily due
to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. The resulting $5.3 million net change reflects
decreases of $3.1 million in employee compensation cost, $1.2 million in travel-related
expenditures, $0.9 million in consulting services expense, and $0.5 million in marketing
program costs. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in
facilities and information systems expenses. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense benefitted by $0.1 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates primarily due
to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. The resulting $4.0 million net change reflects
decreases of $1.3 million in employee compensation cost, $1.3 million in consulting service
expense, $0.6 million in technology-related expenses and $0.5 million in facilities and
information systems expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs decreased due to certain intangible assets
reaching their useful life and becoming fully amortized prior to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs were related to the actions described in Overview Restructuring
Activities above. |
33
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
%* |
|
2009 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
8,487 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
(4,979 |
) |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Loss on cost method investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,570 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,570 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(672 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,505 |
) |
|
|
(136.7 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net decreased due to lower interest rates on investment
balances and lower average cash and investment balances due to the use of $210.0 million in
cash consideration and related expenses associated with our acquisition of WWP in the
second quarter of fiscal 2008. Because we have reallocated our funds principally to
investments in U.S. treasuries, we expect interest and other income, net to decrease as
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense remained relatively unchanged. |
|
|
|
|
Loss on cost method investments for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was primarily due
to a decline in value of our investment in a privately held technology company that was
determined to be other-than-temporary. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 1 of Part I of this report. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes decreased primarily due to decreased federal and state tax
expense, and refundable federal tax credits. We did not record a tax benefit for domestic
losses during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. |
Six months ended April 30, 2008 compared to six months ended April 30, 2009
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
$ |
258,566 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
$ |
(159,405 |
) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
Services |
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
53,035 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
311,601 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
(158,014 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
141,786 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
(45,642 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
Services |
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
225,450 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
179,038 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
(46,412 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
244,165 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
$ |
132,563 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
$ |
(111,602 |
) |
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
258,566 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(159,405 |
) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
141,786 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
(45,642 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
230,543 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
116,780 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
(113,763 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
51,644 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
53,035 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
13,622 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
15,783 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in distribution
of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Optical service delivery |
|
$ |
393,720 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
235,695 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
$ |
(158,025 |
) |
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Services |
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
53,035 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
311,601 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(158,014 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as
International in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands,
except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United States |
|
$ |
338,891 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
190,647 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
$ |
(148,244 |
) |
|
|
(43.7 |
) |
International |
|
|
130,724 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
120,954 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
(9,770 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
311,601 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
(158,014 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in
thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
59,880 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company B |
|
|
47,140 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
33,239 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Company D |
|
|
129,692 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
72,661 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
236,712 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
$ |
105,900 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue decreased primarily due to a $158.0 million decrease in sales of our
optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects
decreases of $72.9 million in sales of core transport products, $66.0 million in sales of
core switching products and $26.2 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro
transport products. This decrease was partially offset by a $7.0 million increase in sales
of our CN 4200. Our revenue was also affected by a $1.6 million decrease in revenue from
our carrier Ethernet service delivery products. Lower carrier Ethernet service delivery
revenue reflects a decrease of $9.2 million in sales of our
broadband access products,
partially offset by a $7.6 million increase in sales of our service delivery and
aggregation switches. |
|
|
|
|
Services revenue increased by $1.4 million due to $4.1 million increase in maintenance
and support services, partially offset by $2.7 million decrease in deployment services. |
|
|
|
|
United States revenue decreased primarily due to a $143.8 million decrease in sales of
our optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects
decreases of $74.2 million in sales of core transport products, $58.7 million in sales of
core switching products and $14.5 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro
transport products. This decrease was partially offset by a $3.6 million increase in sales
of our CN 4200. Our revenue was also affected by a $4.8 million decrease in revenue from
our carrier Ethernet service delivery products. Lower carrier Ethernet service delivery
revenue reflects a decrease of $9.2 million in sales of our
broadband access products,
partially offset by a $4.4 million increase in sales of our service delivery and
aggregation switches. |
|
|
|
|
International revenue decreased primarily due to a
$14.2 million decrease in sales of
our optical service delivery products. This primarily reflects a decrease of $11.7 million
in sales of legacy data networking and metro transport products and $7.3 million in sales
of core switching products. This decrease was partially offset by a $3.4 million increase
in sales of CN 4200, $1.3 million sales of core transport
products, and $1.2 million of services revenue. |
Gross profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased due to less favorable product and
geographic mix, including fewer sales of core switching products as a percentage of total
revenue, increased charges related to losses on committed customer sales contracts and
higher charges relating to warranty. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased due to less
favorable product and geographic mix, including fewer sales of core switching products as a
percentage of total revenue, increased charges related to losses on committed customer
sales contracts and higher charges relating to warranty. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased as a result of
favorable services mix, specifically related to sales and maintenance contracts, as well as
more efficient deployment. Services gross margin remains heavily dependent upon the mix of
services in a given period and may fluctuate from quarter to quarter. |
36
Operating expense
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
80,072 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
96,182 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
$ |
16,110 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
72,199 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
67,114 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
(5,085 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
39,278 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(15,078 |
) |
|
|
(38.4 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
15,230 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(2,602 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
Restructuring cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
146.2 |
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
206,779 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
662,272 |
|
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
$ |
455,493 |
|
|
|
220.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense benefitted by $3.7 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.
The resulting $16.1 million net increase reflects higher employee compensation cost of $8.7
million, including a $1.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense, primarily
due to increased headcount. Other increases included $5.9 million in prototype expense,
$3.9 million in facilities and information systems expense, and $1.9 million in
depreciation expense. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $3.1 million in
consulting services expense. |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense benefitted by $1.4 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. The resulting $5.1 million net change reflects
decreases of $2.6 million in employee compensation cost, $1.6 million in consulting
services expense, and $1.6 million in travel-related costs.
These decreases were partially
offset by a $1.0 million increase in facilities and information systems expense. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense benefitted by $0.4 million in favorable foreign exchange
rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. The resulting $15.1 million net change reflects
decreases of $3.2 million in employee compensation cost, $2.4 million in consulting
services expense, $1.2 million in facilities and information
systems expense, and $0.6
million in technology-related expense. Expense for the first six months of fiscal 2008 included $7.7
million associated with the settlement of patent litigation. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs decreased due to certain intangible assets
reaching their useful life and becoming fully amortized prior to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring cost for the first six months of fiscal
2009 was primarily related to the
actions described in Overview Restructuring Activities above. |
37
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
%* |
|
2009 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
27,569 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
(19,401 |
) |
|
|
(70.4 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
(5,523 |
) |
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
Loss on cost method investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,135 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,135 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
$ |
3,169 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
(331 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net decreased due to lower interest rates on investment
balances and lower average cash and investment balances. Lower cash balances primarily
relate to the repayment at maturity of the $542.3 million principal outstanding on our
3.75% convertible notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and our use of $210.0
million in cash consideration and related expenses associated with our acquisition of WWP
in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the repayment of 3.75% convertible notes at
maturity at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Loss on cost method investments for the first six months of fiscal 2009 was due to the
decline in value of our investments in two privately held technology companies that were
determined to be other-than-temporary. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes decreased primarily due to decreased federal and state tax
expense, and refundable federal tax credits. We did not record a tax benefit for domestic
losses during the first six months of fiscal 2009. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At April 30, 2009, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents, and
short-term and long-term investments. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we reallocated our
short and long-term investments principally into investments in U.S. treasuries. As a result, at April 30,
2009, all short-term investments principally represent U.S. treasuries, except for $0.2 million in publicly
traded securities that we continue to hold as a result of the acquisition of a privately held
technology company in which we held an investment. The following table summarizes our cash and cash
equivalents and investments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
550,669 |
|
|
$ |
583,481 |
|
|
$ |
32,812 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
366,336 |
|
|
|
482,294 |
|
|
|
115,958 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
156,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
1,073,176 |
|
|
$ |
1,065,775 |
|
|
$ |
(7,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in total cash and cash equivalents, and investments during the first six months
of fiscal 2009 was primarily related to the purchase of capital
assets, slightly offset by cash
generated from operating activities described in Operating Activities below. Based on past
performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents,
investments and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital
expenditures, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at
least the next 12 months.
The following sections review the significant activities that had an impact on our cash during
the first six months of fiscal 2009.
Operating Activities
The following tables set forth (in thousands) components of our $2.0 million of cash generated
from operating activities during the period:
38
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
528,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our net loss during the first six months of fiscal 2009 included the significant non-cash
items summarized in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Loss on cost method investments |
|
$ |
3,135 |
|
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures; and
amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
10,830 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
455,673 |
|
Share-based compensation costs |
|
|
17,591 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
15,930 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
8,809 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total significant non-cash charges |
|
$ |
521,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Net
Cash provided by accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, during the first
six months of fiscal 2009 was $21.7 million. Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) increased from 51
days for the first six month of fiscal 2008 to 67 days for the first six months of fiscal 2009. Our
DSOs increased due to a proportionately higher volume of shipments made later in the second quarter
of fiscal 2009 and a higher incidence of customer payment delays.
The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to our accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts, from the end of fiscal 2008 through the end of the second quarter
of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
138,441 |
|
|
$ |
116,671 |
|
|
$ |
(21,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
Cash consumed by inventory during the first six months of fiscal 2009 was $6.6 million. Our
inventory turns increased from 2.8 turns during the first six months of fiscal 2008 to 3.1 turns
for the first six months of fiscal 2009.
During the first six months of fiscal 2009, changes in inventory reflect an $8.8 million
reduction related to a non-cash provision for excess and obsolescence. The following table sets
forth (in thousands) changes to the components of our inventory from the end of fiscal 2008 through
the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,044 |
|
|
$ |
20,538 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
Finished goods |
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
91,769 |
|
|
|
(4,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross inventory |
|
|
116,709 |
|
|
|
113,407 |
|
|
|
(3,302 |
) |
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(23,257 |
) |
|
|
(22,138 |
) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
93,452 |
|
|
$ |
91,269 |
|
|
$ |
(2,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations
Cash used in operations to pay accounts payable, accruals and other obligations during the
first six months of fiscal 2009 was $16.4 million.
39
During the first six months of fiscal 2009, we had non-operating cash accounts payable
reductions of $1.7 million related to equipment payments. Changes in accrued liabilities reflect
non-cash provisions of $9.2 million related to warranties and $0.4 million related to foreign
currency forward contracts. The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes in our accounts
payable, accruals and other obligations from the end of fiscal 2008 through the end of the second
quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
44,761 |
|
|
$ |
32,488 |
|
|
$ |
(12,273 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
96,143 |
|
|
|
95,876 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
7,863 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
8,089 |
|
|
|
8,586 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations |
|
$ |
153,218 |
|
|
$ |
144,813 |
|
|
$ |
(8,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Payable on Convertible Notes
Interest on our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes, due May 1, 2013, is payable on May
1 and November 1 of each year. We paid $0.4 million in interest on our 0.25% convertible notes
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest on our outstanding 0.875% convertible senior notes, due June 15, 2017, is payable on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. We paid $2.2 million in interest on our 0.875% convertible
notes during the first six months of fiscal 2009.
The indentures governing our outstanding convertible notes do not contain any financial
covenants. The indentures provide for customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breaches of covenants, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency and reorganization. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the principal
amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, may be declared immediately due and
payable. These amounts automatically become due and payable if an event of default relating to
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occurs.
The following table reflects (in thousands) the balance of interest payable and the change in
this balance from the end of fiscal 2008 through the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue increased by $3.6 million during the first six months of fiscal 2009. Product
deferred revenue represents payments received in advance of shipment and payments received in
advance of our ability to recognize revenue. Services deferred revenue is related to payment for
service contracts that will be recognized over the contract term. The following table reflects (in
thousands) the balance of deferred revenue and the change in this balance from the end of fiscal
2008 through the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Products |
|
$ |
13,061 |
|
|
$ |
14,401 |
|
|
$ |
1,340 |
|
Services |
|
|
61,366 |
|
|
|
63,598 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
$ |
74,427 |
|
|
$ |
77,999 |
|
|
$ |
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
During the first six months of fiscal 2009, we had net sales and maturities of approximately
$43.0 million of available for sale securities. Investing activities also included the purchase of
approximately $12.6 million in equipment. At the end of second quarter of fiscal 2009, we had
outstanding accounts payable for equipment of $0.6 million, which represents a reduction of $1.7
million from the end of fiscal 2008.
40
Contractual Obligations
During
the first six months of fiscal 2009, we did not experience material changes, outside
of the ordinary course of business, in our contractual obligations from those reported in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. The following is a summary
of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of April 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Interest due on convertible notes |
|
$ |
40,168 |
|
|
$ |
5,120 |
|
|
$ |
10,240 |
|
|
$ |
9,496 |
|
|
$ |
15,312 |
|
Principal due at maturity on convertible notes |
|
|
798,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
63,102 |
|
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
23,171 |
|
|
|
15,142 |
|
|
|
10,993 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
65,161 |
|
|
|
65,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3) |
|
$ |
966,431 |
|
|
$ |
84,077 |
|
|
$ |
33,411 |
|
|
$ |
322,638 |
|
|
$ |
526,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount for operating leases above does not include insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the applicable operating lease.
These costs are variable and are not expected to have a material impact. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain
instances, we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm,
non-cancelable and unconditional obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
As of April 30, 2009, we also had (i) approximately $5.7 million of other long-term obligations in our condensed consolidated balance sheet for
unrecognized tax positions that are not included in this table because the periods of cash settelement with the respective tax authority cannot be
reasonably estimated; and (ii) approximately $0.4 million in accrued liabilities related to foreign currency contracts, reflecting the net loss of the
effective portion of these instruments. |
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set forth
above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial
commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of April 30, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
20,641 |
|
|
$ |
14,365 |
|
|
$ |
5,579 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not
have any equity interests in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose
entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are
subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, goodwill, income
taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, derivatives and hedging, and contingencies and
litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the
basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates
and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where
significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which states that
revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price
to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements
41
and customer purchase orders are generally used to
determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when
applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the price is fixed or determinable based
on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to
refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the
customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history. In
instances where final acceptance of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer,
revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. Revenue for maintenance services
is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be
performed.
Some of our communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential
to the functionality of the equipment. Accordingly, we account for revenue from such equipment in
accordance with SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and all related interpretations. SOP
97-2 incorporates additional guidance unique to software arrangements incorporated with general
accounting guidance, such as: revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In
instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred
until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, we apply the provisions of SOP 97-2
to determine the amount of the arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of
accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include software are separated into more than one
unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the
undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the
undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered
element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is affected by our
judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement
and our ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect the
timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, we apply the provisions of EITF 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF 00-21 allows for separation of elements
into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a
stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered
element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially within our
control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative fair value of each
accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for
the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each
separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria
are met or the last element has been delivered.
Our total deferred revenue for products was $13.1 million and $14.4 million as of October 31,
2008 and April 30, 2009, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over
the period during which the services are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services
was $61.4 million and $63.6 million as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
We recognize share-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123(R), Share-Based
Payments, as interpreted by SAB 107. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. We
estimate the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. This option pricing model requires that we make several estimates, including
the options expected term and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected term of
employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to
remain outstanding. As prescribed by SAB 107, we gather detailed historical information about
specific exercise behavior of our grantees, which we used to determine expected term. We considered
the implied volatility and historical volatility of our stock price in determining our expected
volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both
measures would result in the best estimate of expected volatility. We recognize the estimated fair
value of option-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our
common stock on the date of grant. Our outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the
estimated fair value of service-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense
ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-based vesting
conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as
a condition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of
performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance
period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period
or tranche separately, based upon our determination of whether it is probable that the performance
targets will be achieved.
42
At each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the
performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether
the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense may be
revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance targets.
Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals
are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal, and, to the extent
previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to
vest, the amount of expense takes into account estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in these estimates and assumptions can
materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note 16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information
regarding our assumptions related to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based
compensation expense we incurred for the periods covered in this report. As of April 30, 2009,
total unrecognized compensation expense was: (i) $16.0 million, which relates to unvested stock
options and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years; and (ii)
$55.8 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
We recognize windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of
restricted stock units directly to stockholders equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit
occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by us upon an employees disposition of a share-based
award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that we had recorded. When
assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been realized, we follow
the tax law with-and-without method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall is
considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental
benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including our net operating losses.
The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation awards always
being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall attributable to
share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where our net operating loss
carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current years taxable
income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the
appropriate reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become
obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory
write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. Upon recognition of the write down,
a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and
circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We
recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $10.5 million and $8.8 million in the first
six months of fiscal 2008 and 2009, respectively. These charges were primarily related to excess
inventory due to a change in forecasted product sales. In an effort to limit our exposure to
delivery delays and to satisfy customer needs we purchase inventory based on forecasted sales
across our product lines. In addition, part of our research and development strategy is to promote
the convergence of similar features and functionalities across our product lines. Each of these
practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order products for which we have
forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted. Historically, we have experienced
write downs due to changes in strategic direction, discontinuance of a product and declines in
market conditions. If actual market conditions worsen or differ from those we have assumed, if
there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there is a higher
incidence of inventory obsolescence due to a rapid change in technology, we may be required to take
additional inventory write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Our inventory
net of allowance for excess and obsolescence was $93.5 million and $91.3 as of October 31, 2008 and
April 30, 2009, respectively.
Restructuring
As part of our restructuring costs, we provide for the estimated cost of the net lease expense
for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of the
minimum future lease payments under our contracted lease obligations, offset by the fair value of
the estimated sublease payments that we may receive. As of April 30, 2009, our accrued
restructuring liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $5.8 million.
The total minimum lease payments for these restructured facilities are $10.4 million. These lease
payments will be made over the remaining lives of our leases, which range from nine months to ten
years. If actual market conditions are different than those we have projected, we will be required
to recognize additional restructuring costs or benefits associated with these facilities.
43
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our allowance for doubtful accounts is based on managements assessment, on a specific
identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing credit
evaluations of our customers and generally have not required collateral or other forms of security
from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for our allowance for doubtful accounts,
management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine
collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and
communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition changes, or if actual
defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be required to take a charge for an
allowance for doubtful accounts which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
Our accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts was $138.4 million and $116.7
million as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009 was $0.1 million.
Goodwill
As discussed in Overview above, during the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we conducted an
interim impairment assessment which resulted in the write-off of all goodwill remaining on our
balance sheet. As a result, as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, our consolidated balance
sheet included $455.7 million and $0 in goodwill, respectively.
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over amounts assigned to tangible or
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from our acquisitions. In
accordance with SFAS 142, we test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we have
determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. We also test our goodwill
for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more
likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. SFAS 142
requires a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. Step one is to compare the fair
value of the reporting unit with the units carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test
indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to
compare the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of the
reporting units goodwill. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of
decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a
substantial impairment charge, our operating results would be materially adversely affected in
such period.
We determine the fair value of our single reporting unit to be equal to our market
capitalization plus a control premium. Market capitalization is determined by multiplying the
shares outstanding on the assessment date by the average market price of our common stock over a
10-day period before and a 10-day period after each assessment date. We use this 20-day duration
to consider inherent market fluctuations that may affect any individual closing price. We believe
that our market capitalization alone does not fully capture the fair value of our business as a
whole, or the substantial value that an acquirer would obtain from its ability to obtain control
of our business. As such, in determining fair value, we add a control premium which seeks to
give effect to the increased consideration a potential acquirer would be required to pay in order
to gain sufficient ownership to set policies, direct operations and make decisions related to our
company to our market capitalization.
Interim Impairment Assessment Second Quarter of Fiscal 2009
Based on a combination of factors, including current macroeconomic conditions described above
and a sustained decline in our common stock price and market capitalization below our net book
value, we conducted an interim impairment assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. We performed the step one fair value comparison during the second quarter of fiscal
2009. Our market capitalization was $721.8 million and our carrying value, including goodwill, was
$949.0 million. We applied a 25% control premium to market capitalization to determine a fair value
of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that the fair value was less than our carrying value,
we performed the step two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill
requires valuation of a reporting units tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner
similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the carrying value of a
reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written
down to the extent of the difference. The implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill was
determined to be $0, and, as a result, we recorded a goodwill impairment of $455.7 million,
representing the full carrying value of the goodwill.
Long-lived Assets (excluding goodwill)
Our long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, include: equipment, furniture and fixtures;
finite-lived intangible assets; and maintenance spares. As of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009
these assets totaled $182.3 million and $169.8 million, net, respectively. We account for the
impairment or disposal of these long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144. In
accordance with SFAS 144, we test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted
cash flows. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to make assumptions about future sales
prices and sales volumes for our products that involve new technologies and uncertainties around
customer acceptance of new products. These and other assumptions are used to forecast
future, undiscounted cash flows. Our long-lived assets are part of a single reporting unit
which represents the lowest level for which we identify cash flows.
44
Due to effects on our business of worsening macroeconomic conditions, further exacerbated by
significant disruptions in the financial and credit markets globally, we have experienced order
delays, lengthening sales cycles and slowing deployments resulting in lower demand. As a result of
these conditions, we performed an impairment analysis of all our long-lived assets during the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. Based on our estimate of future, undiscounted cash flows as of April
30, 2009, no impairment was required. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts change,
we may be required to record a non-cash impairment charge related to long-lived assets in future
periods. Such charges would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in
such period.
Investments
We have an investment portfolio comprised of marketable debt securities including corporate
bonds, asset-backed obligations, U.S. government obligations and certificates of deposit. The value
of these securities is subject to market volatility for the period we hold these investments and
until their sale or maturity. We recognize losses when we determine that declines in the fair value
of our investments, below their cost basis, are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a
decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we consider various factors including market price
(when available), investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
investee, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost
basis, and our intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. We make significant judgments in
considering these factors. If we judge that a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the
investment is valued at the current fair value, and we would incur a loss equal to the decline,
which could materially adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
As of April 30, 2009, we held a minority investment of $3.1 million in a privately held
technology company that is reported in other assets. The market for technologies or products
manufactured by this company is in the early stage and markets may never materialize or become
significant. This investment is inherently high risk and we could lose our entire investment. We
monitor this investment for impairment and make appropriate reductions in carrying value when
necessary. If market conditions, the expected financial performance, or the competitive position of
this company deteriorates, we may be required to record a non-cash charge in future periods due to
an impairment of the value of our investment.
During the first six months of fiscal 2009, we recorded losses of $3.1 million related to a
decline in value, determined to be other-than temporary, associated with two of our investments in
privately held technology companies. One of the privately held companies was purchased by a
publicly traded entity. As a result, this investment is now recorded as a trading security.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
As of April 30, 2009, we have recorded a valuation allowance fully offsetting our net deferred
tax assets of $1.2 billion. We calculated the valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both positive and
negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets, when measuring the need
for a valuation allowance. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining net deferred tax assets and
valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections
of profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards,
applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methodologies and tax planning strategies. The valuation
allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to
support its reversal. Due to our recent quarterly losses, the uncertain macroeconomic environment,
and limited visibility into our future results, management does not believe such sufficient
positive evidence exists as of April 30, 2009 and determined to maintain a full valuation
allowance. We will release this valuation allowance when management determines that it is more
likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Any release of valuation allowance
may be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net income, an adjustment to acquisition intangibles,
or an adjustment to paid-in capital, based on tax ordering requirements.
Warranty
Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $37.3 million
and $38.9 million as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, respectively. We provide warranties
for our products for periods ranging from one to five years. We accrue for warranty costs as part
of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor costs, and
associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the
volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the
equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends and the
cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The provision for product warranties was $7.1 million
and $9.2 million for the first six months of fiscal 2008
45
and 2009, respectively. The provision for warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly
basis depending upon the mix of products and customers in that period. If actual product failure
rates, material replacement costs, service or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to
the estimated warranty provision would be required. An increase in warranty claims or the related
costs associated with satisfying these warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and
negatively affect our gross margin.
Uncertain Tax Positions
Effective at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008, we adopted FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which changes accounting
for income taxes. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax
positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The first
step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available
evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit,
including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon
settlement. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and
determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no
assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that
which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves
in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement
of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the
amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in
which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve
provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net
interest.
Loss Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. We consider the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate
the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. A loss is accrued when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly
evaluate current information available to us to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted
and whether new accruals are required.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. We maintain a short-term and long-term investment portfolio. See
Notes 6 and 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report
for information relating to these investments and their fair value. These available-for-sale
securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates
increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percentage
points from current levels, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately $22.1
million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. Because our sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, the
impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material. Our primary exposures to
foreign currency exchange risk are related to non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in
Canadian Dollars (CAD), British Pounds (GBP), Euros (EUR) and Indian Rupees (INR). During
the first six months of fiscal 2009, approximately 80% of our operating expense, exclusive of our
goodwill impairment and restructuring costs, was U.S. dollar denominated.
To reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense, during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts. We use these
derivatives to partially offset our market exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies.
We do not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. These derivatives are
designated as cash flow hedges and have maturities of less than one year. The effective portion of
the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently
reclassified into the operating expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. We
record the ineffectiveness of the hedging instruments in interest and other income, net on our
condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of April 30, 2009, we recorded a loss of $0.4
million associated with these derivatives, all of which was reported as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss).
46
Favorable
foreign exchange translations, net of hedging, benefitted total research and development, sales
and marketing, and general and administrative expenses by approximately $2.4 million and $5.5
million for the quarter and six months ending April 30, 2009, respectively, compared with the
corresponding periods of fiscal 2008. This favorable foreign exchange
translation was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designed to
provide foreign currency protection over the long-term. In designing a specific approach, we
consider several factors, including offsetting exposures, significance of exposures, costs
associated with entering into a particular instrument, and potential effectiveness.
Our foreign currency forward contracts are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity or transaction date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One to three years |
|
|
Three to five years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
USD Functional Currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive EUR / Pay USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
21,592 |
|
|
$ |
21,592 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,009 |
) |
Weighted avg. contract exchange rate |
|
|
1.3915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive INR / Pay USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
Weighted avg. contract exchange rate |
|
|
0.0206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive CAD / Pay USD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
|
$ |
7,594 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
Weighted avg. contract exchange rate |
|
|
0.8252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR Functional Currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive GBP / Pay EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
12,470 |
|
|
|
12,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
654 |
(1) |
Weighted avg. contract exchange rate |
|
|
1.0815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(442 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair value translated at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount is included within accrued liabilities on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. |
As of April 30, 2009, our assets and liabilities related to non-dollar denominated currencies
were primarily related to intercompany payables and receivables. We do not enter into foreign
exchange forward or option contracts for trading purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Ciena carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of Cienas management, including Cienas Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Cienas disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon
this evaluation, Cienas Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Cienas
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in Cienas internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Cienas internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On November 7, 2008, JDS Uniphase Corp. (JDSU) filed a complaint with the United States
International Trade
Commission (ITC) against Ciena and several other respondents, alleging infringement of two patents
(U.S. Patent Nos. 6,658,035 and 6,687,278) relating to tunable laser chip technology. The
complaint, which names Ciena as a company whose products incorporate the accused technology
manufactured by certain other respondents and which technology is imported into the United States,
seeks a determination and relief under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. On December 17, 2008,
Ciena and certain other respondents entered into a Settlement Agreement and Agreement to be Bound
with JDSU, whereby those respondents agreed, in exchange for dismissal from the investigation, to
be bound by any exclusion order issued by the ITC in the investigation in favor of JDSU that takes
effect against one or more of the non-settling respondents. Ciena was not
47
required to make any
payment in connection with this settlement agreement. Based on that agreement, JDSU
contemporaneously filed a motion to terminate the investigation with respect to Ciena and certain
other respondents. Based on the ITC staffs initial response to that motion, the parties entered
into an amended settlement agreement and, on January 8, 2009, JDSU filed an amended motion to
terminate. On February 3, 2009, the ITC judge issued an order granting JDSUs amended motion to
terminate, which order was affirmed by the full commission on February 27, 2009. Accordingly, the
ITC investigation has been terminated with respect to Ciena.
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things,
that certain of the parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the 673 Patent), relating
to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks
injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to
the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and
counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 24, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an
application for inter partes reexamination of the 673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. On the same date, Ciena and the other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending
reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit, which motion is pending with the court. We believe
that we have valid defenses to the lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously.
As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., we became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and alleges, among other things,
that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged
compensation arrangements in ONIs registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices
to artificially inflate ONIs stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and
the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters
alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been
dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than
300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have
been included in a single coordinated proceeding. A description of this litigation and the history
of the proceedings can be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings of Part I of Cienas Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2008. No specific
amount of damages has been claimed in this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation,
the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.
In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the
ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other
information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before
investing in our securities.
Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable macroeconomic and
market conditions and the level of capital expenditure by our largest customers in response to
these conditions.
We achieved considerable annual revenue growth over the last few fiscal years, in part, due to
favorable conditions in our markets. During the second half of 2008, however, our business began to
experience the effects of worsening macroeconomic conditions, further exacerbated by certain
customer-specific challenges and significant disruptions in the financial and credit markets
globally. Many companies, including some of our largest communications service provider customers,
have slowed spending and indicated an intention to reduce their overall capital expenditures this
year. We have experienced order delays, lengthening sales cycles and slowing deployments, resulting
in lower demand across our customer base in all geographies. As a result, our revenue and
profitability have been negatively affected in recent quarters. Continued weakness in our markets
and the broader economy may cause our customers to delay or cancel network infrastructure projects.
Economic weakness, customer financial difficulties and constrained spending on communications
networks have previously resulted in sustained periods of decreased demand for our products and
services that have adversely affected our operating results. Challenging economic and market
conditions may also result in:
|
|
|
difficulty forecasting, budgeting and planning due to limited visibility into the
spending plans of current or prospective customers; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition for fewer network projects and sales opportunities; |
48
|
|
|
pricing pressure that may adversely affect revenue and gross margin; |
|
|
|
|
higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue; |
|
|
|
|
increased risk of charges relating to excess and obsolete inventories and the write
off of goodwill and other intangible assets; and |
|
|
|
|
customer financial difficulty and increased risk of doubtful accounts receivable. |
We are uncertain as to how long current unfavorable macroeconomic and industry conditions will
persist and the magnitude of their effects on our business and results of operations. As a result
of these market conditions, we expect revenue for fiscal 2009 to be significantly lower than our
fiscal 2008 results and that we will not be profitable for the year. The extent of this years
revenue decline and the magnitude of the effect on our result of operations for fiscal 2009 are
difficult to predict and significantly linked to the duration and severity of the current economic
downturn and the resulting level of capital expenditure of our largest customers.
A small number of communications service providers account for a significant portion of our
revenue, and the loss of any of these customers, or a significant reduction in their spending,
would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a relatively small number of
communications service providers. Five customers accounted for greater than 60% of our revenue in
each of fiscal 2007 and 2008. Consequently, our financial results are closely correlated with the
spending of a relatively small number of communications service providers. Because their spending
may be unpredictable and sporadic, our revenue and operating results can fluctuate on a quarterly
basis.
Our business and financial results are also closely tied to the prospects, performance, and
financial condition of our largest customers and are significantly affected by market or
industry-wide changes, including reductions in enterprise and consumer spending, that affect the
businesses and level of infrastructure-related spending by communications service providers. In
response to the current economic downturn, we have seen our large service provider customers take a
more cautious approach to their capital spending and some have indicated their intent to reduce
capital spending this year. Reliance upon a relatively small number of customers also increases our
exposure to changes in their network and purchasing strategies. Some of our customers are pursuing
efforts to outsource network management and operation or have indicated a strategy to reduce the
number of vendors from which they purchase equipment. These strategies may present challenges to
our business and could benefit our larger competitors. The loss of one or more large service
providers as customers, or significant reductions in their spending, would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our concentration in revenue
has increased in recent years, in part, as a result of consolidations among a number of our largest
customers. Consolidations may increase the likelihood of temporary or indefinite reductions in
customer spending or changes in network strategy that could harm our business and operating
results.
Our revenue and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter.
Our revenue and results of operations can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. Our
budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future revenue and gross
margin, and substantial reductions in expense are difficult and can take time to implement.
Uncertainty or lack of visibility into customer spending, and changes in economic or market
conditions, can make it difficult to prepare reliable estimates of future revenue and corresponding
expense levels. Consequently, our level of operating expense or inventory may be high relative to
our revenue, which could harm our ability to achieve or maintain profitability. Given current
macroeconomic conditions and the effect of lower demand in recent quarters, lower levels of backlog
and an increase in the percentage of quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter
could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarterly results.
Additional factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results
include:
|
|
|
broader economic and market conditions affecting us and our customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in capital spending by large communications service providers; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and size of orders, including our ability to recognize revenue under customer
contracts; |
|
|
|
|
variations in the mix between higher and lower margin products and services; and |
|
|
|
|
the level of pricing pressure we encounter. |
49
Many factors affecting our results of operations are beyond our control, particularly in the
case of large service provider orders and multi-vendor or multi-technology network infrastructure
builds where the achievement of certain thresholds for acceptance is subject to the readiness and
performance of the customer or other providers, and changes in customer requirements or
installation plans. As a consequence, our results for a particular quarter may be difficult to
predict, and our prior results are not necessarily indicative of results likely in future periods.
The factors above may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate unpredictably from
quarter to quarter, which may cause our stock price to decline.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and results of operations.
The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are
extremely competitive, particularly the market for sales to large communications service providers.
The level of competition and pricing pressure that we face increases substantially during periods
of macroeconomic weakness and constrained spending. As a result of current market conditions, we
have experienced significant competition and increased pricing pressure, particularly relating to
our optical transport products. We face particularly intense competition in our efforts to attract
additional large carrier customers in new geographies and secure new market opportunities with
existing carrier customers. In an effort to secure these new opportunities or displace incumbent
equipment vendors, we have recently entered into contracts with large carrier customers that
resulted in negative gross margins.
Competition in our markets, generally, is based on any one or a combination of the following
factors: price, product features and functionality, manufacturing capability and lead-times,
incumbency and existing business relationships, scalability and the ability of products to meet the
immediate and future network requirements of customers. A small number of very large companies have
historically dominated our industry. These competitors have substantially greater financial,
technical and marketing resources, greater manufacturing capacity, broader product offerings and
more established relationships with service providers and other potential customers than we do.
Because of their scale and resources, they may be perceived to be better positioned to offer
network operating or management service for large carrier customers. Consolidation activity among
large networking equipment providers has caused some of our competitors to grow even larger, which
may increase their strategic advantages and adversely affect our competitive position.
We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a
specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market. Due to the narrower focus of
their efforts, these competitors may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly
or may be more attractive to customers.
Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:
|
|
|
significant price competition, particularly from competitors in Asia; |
|
|
|
|
customer financing assistance; |
|
|
|
|
early announcements of competing products and extensive marketing efforts; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering equity ownership positions to customers; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering to repurchase our equipment from existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising assistance; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property assertions and disputes. |
The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated base
of potential customers such as communications service providers. If competitive pressures increase
or we fail to compete successfully in our markets, our sales and profitability would suffer.
Our reliance upon third party manufacturers exposes us to risks that could negatively affect our
business and
operations.
We rely upon third party contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing
of our products and components. In recent years we have transitioned a significant portion of our
product manufacturing to overseas suppliers in Asia, with much of the manufacturing taking place in
China and Thailand. Some of our contract manufacturers ship our products directly to our customers.
Our reliance upon these manufacturers could expose us to increased risks related to lead times,
continued supply, on-time delivery, quality assurance and compliance with environmental standards
and other regulations. Reliance upon third parties for manufacture of our products significantly
exposes us to risks related to their
50
business, financial position and continued viability, which
may be adversely affected by broader negative macroeconomic conditions and difficulties in the
credit markets. These conditions may disrupt their operations and ability to satisfy our
manufacturing requirements. Disruptions to our business could also arise as a result of ineffective
business continuity and disaster recovery plans by our manufacturers. We do not have contracts in
place with some of our manufacturers and do not have guaranteed supply of components or
manufacturing capacity. We could also experience difficulties as a result of geopolitical events,
military actions or health pandemics in the countries where our products or components thereof are
manufactured. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, protests resulted in a blockade of
Thailands main international airport, which delayed product shipments from one of our key contract
manufacturers. Significant disruptions or difficulties with our contract manufacturers could
negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Difficulties with third party component suppliers, including sole and limited source suppliers,
could increase our costs and harm our business and customer relationships.
We depend on third party suppliers for our product components and subsystems, as well as for
equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include key optical and
electronic components for which reliable, high-volume supply is often available from sole or
limited sources. We have previously encountered shortages in availability for important components
that have affected our ability to deliver products in a timely manner. Our business would be
negatively affected if one or more of our suppliers were to experience any significant disruption
in their operations affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of components.
Current unfavorable economic conditions, including a lack of liquidity, may adversely affect the
business of our suppliers or the terms on which we purchase components. We may be unable to secure
the components or subsystems that we require in sufficient quantities or on reasonable terms. The
loss of a source of supply, or lack of sufficient availability of key components, could require us
to redesign products that use those components, which would increase our costs and negatively
affect our product gross margin and results of operations. Difficulties with suppliers could also
result in lost revenue, additional product costs and deployment delays that could harm our business
and customer relationships.
Investment of research and development resources in technologies for which there is not a matching
market opportunity, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is
market demand, would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
The market for communications networking equipment is characterized by rapidly evolving
technologies and changes in market demand. We continually invest in research and development to
enhance our existing products, create new products and develop or acquire new technologies. Our
current development efforts are focused upon the evolution of our CoreDirector Multiservice Optical
Switch family, the expansion of our carrier Ethernet service delivery and aggregation products and
the extension of our CN 4200 converged optical service delivery portfolio, including 100G
technologies and capabilities. There is often a lengthy period between commencing these development
initiatives and bringing the new or revised product to market, and, during this time, technology or
the market may move in directions we had not anticipated. Even if we are able to anticipate market
conditions and develop and introduce new products or enhancements, there is no guarantee that these
products will achieve market acceptance or that the timing of market adoption will be as predicted.
There is a significant possibility, therefore, that some of our development decisions, including
our acquisitions or investments in technologies, will not turn out as anticipated, and that our
investment in some projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we may miss a
market opportunity because we fail to invest, or invest too late, in a technology, product or
enhancement that could have been highly profitable. Changes in market demand or investment
priorities may also cause us to discontinue existing or planned development for new products or
features, which can have a disruptive effect on our relationships with customers. If we fail to
make the right investments or fail to make them at the right time, our competitive position may
suffer and our revenue and profitability could be harmed.
Network equipment sales to large communications service providers often involve lengthy sales
cycles and protracted contract negotiations and may require us to assume terms or conditions that
negatively affect our pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition.
Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and expand our sales
to large communications
service providers. These sales typically involve lengthy sales cycles, protracted and
sometimes difficult contract negotiations, and extensive product testing and network certification.
We are sometimes required to agree to contract terms or conditions that negatively affect pricing,
payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition in order to consummate a sale. As a result of
current market conditions, these customers may request extended payment terms, vendor or
third-party financing and other alternative purchase structures. These terms may, in turn,
negatively affect our revenue and results of operations and increase our susceptibility to
quarterly fluctuations in our results. Service providers may ultimately insist upon terms and
conditions that we deem too onerous or not in our best interest. Moreover, our purchase agreements
generally do not require that a customer guarantee any minimum purchase level and customers often
have the right to modify, delay, reduce or cancel
previous orders. As a result, we may incur
substantial expense and devote time and resources to potential relationships that never materialize
or result in lower than anticipated sales.
51
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results
of operations.
The development and production of equipment that addresses multi-service communications
network traffic is complicated. Some of our products can be fully tested only when deployed in
communications networks or with other equipment and therefore may contain undetected hardware or
software errors at the time of release. As a result, product performance problems are often more
acute for initial deployments of new products and product enhancements. Unanticipated problems can
relate to the design, manufacturing, installation or integration of our products. Performance
problems and product malfunctions can also relate to defects in components supplied by third
parties. If we experience significant performance, reliability or quality problems with our
products, or our customers suffer significant repair, network restoration, or implementation delays
relating to these problems, a number of negative effects on our business could result, including:
|
|
|
increased costs to address or remediate software or hardware defects; |
|
|
|
|
payment of liquidated damages or claims for damages for performance failures or delays; |
|
|
|
|
increased inventory obsolescence and warranty expense; |
|
|
|
|
delays in collecting accounts receivable; and |
|
|
|
|
cancellation or reduction in orders from customers. |
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our
business and results of operations.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new
sales channels.
We continue to take steps to sell our products into new geographic markets outside of our
traditional markets and to a broader customer base, including other large communications service
providers, enterprises, cable operators, wireless operators and federal, state and local
governments. We have less experience in these markets and, in order to succeed in these markets, we
believe we must develop and manage new sales channels and distribution arrangements. We expect
these relationships to be an increasingly important part of our business. This strategy may not
succeed and we may be exposed to increased expense and legal, business and financial risks
associated with entering new markets and pursuing new customer segments through channel partners.
Part of our strategy is to pursue sales to federal, state and local governments. These sales
require compliance with complex procurement regulations with which we have limited experience. We
may be unable to increase our sales to government contractors if we determine that we cannot comply
with applicable regulations. Our failure to comply with regulations for existing contracts could
result in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings involving fines and suspension, or
exclusion, from participation in federal government contracts. Failure to manage additional sales
channels effectively would limit our ability to succeed in these new markets and could adversely
affect our ability to expand our customer base and grow our business.
We may experience delays in the development of our products that may negatively affect our
competitive position and business.
Our products are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in
developing, manufacturing or deploying them. Each step in the development life cycle of our
products presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could affect the
cost-effective and timely development of our products. Intellectual property disputes, failure of
critical design elements, and other execution risks may delay or even prevent the release of these
products. Delays in product development may affect our reputation with customers and the timing and
level of demand for our
products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely manner, our
competitive position may suffer and our business, financial condition and results of operations
would be harmed.
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory
purchase practices, the convergence of our product lines or unfavorable macroeconomic or industry
conditions.
52
To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our
contract manufacturers and suppliers to manufacture components and complete assemblies based on
forecasts of customer demand. As a result, our inventory purchases expose us to the risk that our
customers either will not order the products we have forecasted or will purchase fewer products
than forecasted. Unfavorable market or industry conditions can limit visibility into customer
spending plans and compound the difficulty of forecasting inventory at appropriate levels.
Moreover, our customer purchase agreements generally do not guarantee any minimum purchase level,
and customers often have the right to modify, reduce or cancel purchase quantities. As a result, we
may purchase inventory in anticipation of sales that do not occur. Historically, our inventory
write-offs have resulted from the circumstances above. As features and functionalities converge
across our product lines, and we introduce new products, however, we face an additional risk that
customers may forego purchases of one product we have inventoried in favor of another product with
similar functionality. If we are required to write off or write down a significant amount of
inventory, our results of operations for the period would be materially adversely affected.
Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.
We have previously taken and are in the process of implementing steps, including reductions in
force, office closures, and internal reorganizations to reduce the size and cost of our operations
and to better match our resources with market opportunities. We may take similar steps in the
future. These changes could be disruptive to our business and may result in the recording of
accounting charges, including inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction
costs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial charges resulting
from any future restructuring activities could adversely affect our results of operations in the
period in which we take such a charge.
Our failure to manage effectively our relationships with third party service partners could
adversely impact our financial results and relationship with customers.
We rely on a number of third party service partners, both domestic and international, to
complement our global service and support resources. We rely upon these partners for certain
maintenance and support functions, as well as the installation of our equipment in some large
network builds. These projects often include complex customization, installation and testing. In
order to ensure the proper installation and maintenance of our products, we must identify, train
and certify qualified service partners. Certification can be costly and time-consuming, and our
partners often provide similar services for other companies, including our competitors. We may not
be able to manage effectively our relationships with our service partners and cannot be certain
that they will be able to deliver services in the manner or time required. If our service partners
are unsuccessful in delivering services:
|
|
|
we may suffer delays in recognizing revenue; |
|
|
|
|
our services revenue and gross margin may be adversely affected; and |
|
|
|
|
our relationship with customers could suffer. |
Difficulties with service partners could cause us to transition a larger share of deployment and
other services from third parties to internal resources, thereby increasing our service overhead
costs and negatively affecting our services gross margin and results of operations.
We may incur significant costs as a result of our efforts to protect and enforce our intellectual
property rights or respond to claims of infringement from others.
Our business is dependent upon the successful protection of our proprietary technology and
intellectual property. We are subject to the risk that unauthorized parties may attempt to access,
copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology, particularly as we expand our product
development into India and increase our reliance upon contract manufacturers in Asia. These and
other international operations could expose us to a lower level of intellectual property protection
than in the United States. Monitoring unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and we
cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of
unauthorized use. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete effectively
could be harmed.
From time to time we have been subject to litigation and other third party intellectual
property claims, primarily alleging patent infringement. We have also been subject to third party
claims arising as a result of our indemnification obligations to customers or resellers that
purchase our products or as a result of alleged infringement relating to third party components
that
we include in our products. The frequency of these assertions is increasing as patent holders,
including entities that are not in our industry and that purchase patents as an investment, use
infringement assertions as a competitive tactic or as a source of additional revenue. Intellectual
property infringement claims can significantly divert the time and attention of our personnel and
result in costly litigation. These claims can also require us to pay substantial damages or
royalties, enter into costly license agreements or develop non-infringing technology. Accordingly,
the costs associated with intellectual property infringement claims could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
53
Our international operations could expose us to additional risks and result in increased operating
expense.
We market, sell and service our products globally. We have established offices around the
world, including in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and the Asia Pacific
region. We have also established a major development center in India and are increasingly reliant
upon overseas suppliers, particularly in Asia, for sourcing of important components and
manufacturing of our products. Our increasingly global operations may result in increased risk to
our business and could give rise to unanticipated expense, difficulties or other effects that could
adversely affect our financial results.
International operations are subject to inherent risks, including:
|
|
|
effects of changes in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of economic conditions in countries outside the United States; |
|
|
|
|
less protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax and customs consequences, particularly as related to transfer-pricing issues; |
|
|
|
|
social, political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
higher incidence of corruption; |
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures, export compliance, qualification to transact business and
additional regulatory requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, epidemics and acts of war or terrorism. |
We expect that our international activities will be dynamic in the near term, and we may enter
new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others. These changes to our international
operations may require significant management attention and result in additional expense. In some
countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local
partners. Our inability to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory
arrangements for international sales of our products could impact our ability to maintain or
increase international market demand for our products.
Our use and reliance upon development resources in India may expose us to unanticipated costs or
liabilities.
We have a significant development center in India and, in recent years, have increased
headcount and development activity at this facility. There is no assurance that our reliance upon
development resources in India will enable us to achieve meaningful cost reductions or greater
resource efficiency. Further, our development efforts and other operations in India involve
significant risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty hiring and retaining appropriate engineering resources due to intense
competition for such resources and resulting wage inflation; |
|
|
|
|
the knowledge transfer related to our technology and resulting exposure to
misappropriation of intellectual property or information that is proprietary to us, our
customers and other third parties; |
|
|
|
|
heightened exposure to changes in the economic, security and political conditions of
India; and |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and tax compliance in India. |
Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks related to our operations in
India could expose us to increased expense, impair our development efforts, harm our competitive
position and damage our reputation.
We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale
of complementary products or technology of other companies.
54
We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute their
products or technology. We rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or
technologies or to fulfill an element of our product portfolio. As part of our strategy to
diversify our product portfolio and customer base, we may enter into additional original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) or resale agreements in the future. We may incur unanticipated costs or
difficulties relating to our resale of third party products. Our third party relationships could
expose us to risks associated with delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of
products or technology. We may also be required by customers to assume warranty, indemnity, service
and other commercial obligations greater than the commitments, if any, made to us by our technology
partners. Some of our strategic partners are relatively small companies with limited financial
resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to
expend our own resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to the risks above could harm our
reputation with key customers and negatively affect our business and our results of operations.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect
receivables and could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
In the course of our sales to customers, we may have difficulty collecting receivables and
could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts. We may be exposed to similar
risks relating to third party resellers and other sales channel partners. A continued lack of
liquidity in the capital markets or a sustained period of unfavorable economic conditions may
increase our exposure to credit risks. While we monitor these situations carefully and attempt to
take appropriate measures to protect ourselves, it is possible that we may have to write down or
write off doubtful accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating
results for the period in which they occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on
our revenue and operating results.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business
effectively.
Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical and other personnel with experience
in our industry is increasing in intensity, and our employees have been the subject of targeted
hiring by our competitors. With respect to our engineering resources, we may find it particularly
difficult to attract and retain sufficiently skilled personnel in areas including data networking,
Ethernet service delivery and network management software engineering in certain geographic
markets. We may experience difficulty retaining and motivating existing employees and attracting
qualified personnel to fill key positions. Because we rely upon equity awards as a significant
component of compensation, particularly for our executive team, a lack of positive performance in
our stock price, reduced grant levels, or changes to our compensation program may adversely affect
our ability to attract and retain key employees. In addition, none of our executive officers is
bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. It may be difficult to replace members of
our management team or other key personnel, and the loss of such individuals could be disruptive to
our business. Because we generally do not have employment contracts with our employees, we must
rely upon providing competitive compensation packages and a high-quality work environment in order
to retain and motivate employees. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we
may be unable to manage our business effectively.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Because a significant portion of our sales is denominated in U.S. dollars, a further increase
in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in markets
outside the United States. In addition, we face exposure to currency exchange rates as a result of
our non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Europe, Asia and Canada. In recent years, our
international operations and our reliance upon international suppliers have grown considerably. A
weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw
materials where we must purchase components in foreign currencies. As a result, we may be
susceptible to negative effects of foreign exchange changes. We have recently begun to hedge
against currency exposure associated with anticipated foreign currency cash flows. These hedging
activities are intended to offset currency fluctuations on a portion of our non-U.S. dollar
denominated operating expense. There can be no assurance that these hedging instruments will be
effective in all circumstances and losses associated with these instruments may negatively affect
our results of operations.
Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties and our
business would be adversely affected if this technology was no longer available to us on
commercially reasonable terms.
We integrate third-party software and other technology into our embedded operating system,
network management
system tools and other products. Licenses for this technology may not be available or continue
to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Third party licensors may insist on
unreasonable financial or other terms in connection with our use of such technology. Difficulties
with third party technology licensors could result in termination of such licenses, which may
result in significant costs and require us to obtain or develop a substitute technology. Difficulty
obtaining and maintaining third-party technology licenses may disrupt development of our products
and increase our costs, which could harm our business.
55
Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and
information systems and modifications may disrupt our business, operating processes and internal
controls.
The successful operation of various internal business processes and information systems is
critical to the efficient operation of our business. In recent years, we have experienced
considerable growth in transaction volume, headcount and reliance upon international resources in
our operations. Our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to
support growth of our business. To improve the efficiency of our operations and achieve greater
automation, we routinely upgrade business processes and information systems. Significant changes to
our processes and systems expose us to a number of operational risks. These changes may be costly
and disruptive, and could impose substantial demands on management time. These changes may also
require the modification of a number of internal control procedures. Any material disruption,
malfunction or similar problems with our business processes or information systems, or the
transition to new processes and systems, could have a negative effect on the operation of our
business and our results of operations.
Strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.
We may acquire or make strategic investments in other companies to expand the markets we
address, diversify our customer base or acquire or accelerate the development of technology or
products. To do so, we may use cash, issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders
ownership, incur debt or assume indebtedness. These transactions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
significant integration costs |
|
|
|
|
integration and rationalization of operations, products, technologies and personnel; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty completing projects of the acquired company and costs related to in-process
projects; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees; |
|
|
|
|
ineffective internal controls over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on unfamiliar suppliers or manufacturers; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement claims;
and |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax or accounting effects including amortization expense related to intangible
assets and charges associated with impairment of goodwill; |
As a result of these and other risks, our acquisitions or strategic investments may not reap
the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of
operation and financial condition.
Changes in government regulation affecting the communications industry and the businesses of our
customers could harm our prospects and operating results.
The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications
industry and similar agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other
countries. Many of our largest customers are subject to the rules and regulations of these
agencies. Changes in regulatory requirements in the United States or other countries could inhibit
service providers from investing in their communications network infrastructures or introducing new
services. These changes could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Changes in
regulatory tariff requirements or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on
communications networks could slow the development or expansion of network infrastructures and
adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Governmental regulations affecting the import or export of products, and environmental regulations
relating to our
products, could negatively affect our revenues.
The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license
requirements and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies. Governmental regulation
of imports or exports, or our failure to obtain required import or export approval for our
products, could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenues.
Failure to comply with such regulations could result in penalties, costs and restrictions on export
privileges. In
56
addition, our operations may be negatively affected by environmental regulations,
such as the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain
Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) that have been adopted by the
European Union. Compliance with these and similar environmental regulations may increase our cost
of building and selling our products, make it difficult to obtain supply of compliant components or
require us to write off non-compliant inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
We may be required to write down long-lived assets and a significant impairment charge would
adversely affect our operating results.
At April 30, 2009, we had $169.8 million in long-lived assets, which includes $76.3 million
of other intangible assets on our balance sheet. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to
make assumptions about future sales prices and sales volumes for our products. Our assumptions are
used to forecast future, undiscounted cash flows. Given the current economic environment,
uncertainties regarding the duration and severity of these conditions, forecasting future business
is difficult and subject to modification. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts
change, we may be required to assess long-lived assets and could record an impairment charge. Any
impairment charge relating to long-lived assets would have the effect of decreasing our earnings
or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment
charge, our operating results could be materially adversely affected in such period.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a
report containing managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such
internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely
to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources.
Changes in our business will necessitate ongoing modifications to our internal control systems,
processes and information systems. Increases in our global operations or expansion into new regions
could pose additional challenges to our internal control systems as these operations become more
significant. We cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial
reporting will be sufficient to enable management or our independent registered public accounting
firm to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis.
If we or our independent registered public accounting firms are unable to assert that our internal
controls over financial reporting are effective, our business may be harmed. Market perception of
our financial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer
perception of our business may suffer.
Obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness on our convertible notes may adversely
affect our business.
At April 30, 2009, indebtedness on our outstanding convertible notes totaled $798.0 million in
aggregate principal. Our indebtedness and repayment obligations could have important negative
consequences, including:
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing, particularly in light of
unfavorable conditions in the credit markets; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the availability of cash resources for other purposes, including capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the markets in which we compete; and |
|
|
|
|
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to competitors that have better
access to capital resources. |
We may also add additional indebtedness such as equipment loans, working capital lines of
credit and other long-term debt.
Our stock price is volatile.
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain
volatile in the future. Volatility in our stock price can arise as a result of a number of the
factors discussed in this Risk Factors section. The stock market has experienced extreme price
and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology
57
companies, with such
volatility often unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Divergence between our
actual or anticipated financial results and published expectations of analysts can cause
significant swings in our stock price. Our stock price can also be affected by announcements that
we, our competitors, or our customers may make, particularly announcements related to acquisitions
or other significant transactions. Our common stock is included in a number of widely-followed
market indices, including the S&P 500 Index, and any change in the composition of these indices to
exclude our company would adversely affect our stock price. These factors, as well as conditions
affecting the general economy or financial markets, may materially adversely affect the market
price of our common stock in the future.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Cienas annual meeting of shareholders was held on March 25, 2009. At the annual meeting,
Ciena shareholders approved the proposals and elected the directors as set forth below by the votes
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
1. Election to the Board of
Directors of two Class III
Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen P. Bradley |
|
|
76,833,074 |
|
|
|
1,486,202 |
|
|
|
276,909 |
|
Bruce L. Claflin |
|
|
76,951,022 |
|
|
|
1,384,649 |
|
|
|
260,514 |
|
Each director nominee above was elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast by
shareholders in accordance with our bylaws. In addition, the following directors continued to hold
office after the annual meeting: Lawton W. Fitt, Patrick H. Nettles, Michael J. Rowny, Harvey B.
Cash, Judith M. OBrien and Gary B. Smith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
2. Ratification of the
appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Cienas independent
registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year
ending October 31, 2009. |
|
|
77,717,231 |
|
|
|
741,102 |
|
|
|
137,852 |
|
The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm was
approved by the required affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by shareholders.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan RSU Agreement (Employees) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan Option Agreement (Employees) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan RSU Agreement (Directors) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciena Corporation
|
|
Date: June 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
|
|
|
James E. Moylan, Jr. |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
59