e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or
Organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
01803
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common equity held
by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day
of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $2.3 billion based upon the last
reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market for such
date. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock
held by officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons
who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been
excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
conclusive.
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of October 31, 2009, was 278,666,124.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
Registrants 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are statements that
could be deemed forward-looking, including statements pertaining
to: our revenue, earnings, cash flows and liquidity; the
potential of future product releases; our product development
plans and investments in research and development; future
acquisitions; international operations and localized versions of
our products; our contractual commitments; our fiscal 2010
revenue and expense expectations and legal proceedings and
litigation matters. You can identify these and other
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
may, will, should,
expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, intends,
potential, continue or the negative of
such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating
to any of the foregoing statements. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report
under the heading Risk Factors. All forward-looking
statements included in this document are based on information
available to us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and
specifically decline any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of speech,
imaging and keypad solutions for businesses, organizations and
consumers around the world. Our technologies, applications and
services make the user experience more compelling by
transforming the way people interact with devices and systems,
and how they create, share and use documents. Our solutions are
used every day by millions of people and thousands of businesses
for tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and distribute our products through a global
network of resellers, including system integrators, independent
software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors, and also sell
directly through a dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to expand our assets, geographic presence,
distribution network and customer base through acquisitions of
other businesses and technologies.
Solutions offered in our three core markets; Mobile-Enterprise,
Healthcare-Dictation, and Imaging, include:
Healthcare Solutions The healthcare industry
is under significant pressure to streamline operations, reduce
costs and improve patient care. In recent years, healthcare
organizations such as hospitals, clinics, medical groups,
physicians offices and insurance providers have
increasingly turned to speech solutions to automate manual
processes such as the dictation and transcription of patient
records.
We provide comprehensive dictation and transcription solutions
and services that automate the input and management of medical
information. Our hosted and on-premise solutions provide
platforms to generate and distribute clinical documentation
through the use of advanced dictation and transcription
features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly productive
medical transcription solutions, as well as accelerate future
innovation to transform the way healthcare providers document
patient care. We also offer speech recognition solutions for
1
radiology, cardiology, pathology and related specialties, that
help healthcare providers dictate, edit and sign reports without
manual transcription.
Hospitals, clinics and group practices, as well as physicians,
use our healthcare solutions to manage the dictation and
transcription of patient records. We utilize a focused,
enterprise sales team and professional services organization to
address the market and implementation requirements of the
healthcare industry. Our fiscal 2008 acquisition of Philips
Speech Recognition Systems significantly enhanced our ability to
deliver innovative, speech-driven clinical documentation and
communication solutions to healthcare organizations throughout
Europe. In some cases, our healthcare solutions are priced under
a traditional software perpetual licensing model. However,
certain of our healthcare solutions, in particular our
transcription solution, are also offered on an on-demand model,
charged as a subscription and priced by volume of usage (such as
number of lines transcribed). During fiscal 2009, we experienced
a significant shift in customer preference toward our
subscription pricing model.
Enterprise Solutions To remain competitive,
organizations must improve the quality of customer care while
reducing costs and ensuring a positive customer experience.
Technological innovation, competitive pressures and rapid
commoditization have made it increasingly important for
organizations to achieve enduring market differentiation and
secure customer loyalty. In this environment, organizations need
to satisfy the expectations of increasingly savvy and mobile
consumers who demand high levels of customer service.
We deliver a portfolio of customer service business intelligence
and authentication solutions that are designed to help companies
better support, understand and communicate with their customers.
Our solutions improve the customer experience, increase the use
of self-service and enable new revenue opportunities. We
complement our solutions and products with a global professional
services organization that supports customers and partners with
business and systems consulting project management,
user-interface design, speech science, application development
and business performance optimization, allowing us to deliver
end-to-end
speech solutions and system integration for speech-enabled
customer care. In addition, we offer solutions that can meet
customer care needs through direct interaction with thin-client
applications on cell phones, enabling customers to very quickly
retrieve relevant information. Use of our speech-enabled and
thin-client customer care solutions can dramatically decrease
customer care costs, in comparison to calls handled by
operators. Our acquisition of SNAPin, Inc., a developer of
self-service software for mobile devices, during fiscal 2009
expanded our presence and capabilities in these areas.
Our solutions are used by a wide variety of enterprises in
customer-service intensive sectors, including
telecommunications, financial services, travel and
entertainment, and government. Our speech solutions are designed
to serve our global partners and customers and are available in
up to 50 languages and dialects worldwide. In addition to
our own sales and professional services teams, we often work
closely with industry partners, including Avaya, Cisco and
Genesys, that integrate our solutions into their hardware and
software platforms. Our enterprise solutions offerings include
both a traditional software perpetual licensing model and an
on-demand model, charged as a subscription and priced by volume
of usage (such as number of minutes callers use the system or
number of calls completed in the system).
Mobile Solutions Today, an increasing number
of people worldwide rely on mobile devices to stay connected,
informed and productive. We help consumers use the powerful
capabilities of their phones, cars and personal navigation
devices by enabling the use of voice commands and keypad
solutions to control these devices more easily and naturally,
and to access the array of content and services available on the
Internet.
Our portfolio of mobile solutions and services includes an
integrated suite of voice and
text-to-speech
solutions, predictive text technologies, mobile messaging
services and emerging services such as Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our solutions are used by mobile phone, automotive, personal
navigation device and other consumer electronic manufacturers
and their suppliers, including Amazon, Apple, BMW, Ford, Garmin,
LG Electronics, Mercedes Benz, Nokia, Samsung and TomTom. In
addition, telecommunications carriers, web search companies and
content providers are increasingly using our mobile search and
communication solutions to offer value-added services to their
subscribers and customers. Our mobile solutions are sold to
device manufacturers, on a royalty model, generally priced per
device sold. In addition, our mobile solutions are sold through
telecommunications carriers or directly to consumers, and priced
on a volume of usage model (such as per subscriber or per use).
During fiscal 2009, we expanded our mobile presence and product
offerings through our acquisitions of
2
Zi Corporation; nCore Ltd.; Jott Networks, Inc.; and
certain assets from Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH.
Desktop Dictation Our suite of general
purpose desktop dictation applications increases productivity by
using speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and
complex tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. Our Dragon NaturallySpeaking
family of products delivers enhanced productivity for
professionals and consumers who need to create documents and
transcripts. These solutions allow users to automatically
convert speech into text at up to 160
words-per-minute,
with support for over 300,000 words and with high accuracy. This
vocabulary can be expanded by users to include specialized words
and phrases and can be adapted to recognize individual voice
patterns. Our desktop dictation software is currently available
in eleven languages. We utilize a combination of our global
reseller network and direct sales to distribute our desktop
dictation products. Our desktop dictation solutions are
generally sold under a traditional perpetual software license
model.
Imaging The proliferation of the Internet,
email and other networks have greatly simplified the ability to
share electronic documents, resulting in an ever-growing volume
of documents to be used and stored. Our PDF and document imaging
solutions reduce the costs associated with paper documents
through easy to use scanning, document management and electronic
document routing solutions. We offer versions of our products to
hardware vendors, home offices, small businesses and enterprise
customers.
Our imaging solutions offer comprehensive PDF applications
designed specifically for business users, optical character
recognition technology to deliver highly accurate document and
PDF conversion, and applications that combine PDF creation with
network scanning to quickly enable distribution of documents to
users desktops or to enterprise applications, as well as
software development toolkits for independent software vendors.
Our imaging solutions are generally sold under a traditional
perpetual software license model. We utilize a combination of
our global reseller network and direct sales to distribute our
imaging products. We license our software to original equipment
manufacturers such as Brother, Canon, Dell, HP and Xerox, which
bundle our solutions with multifunction devices, digital
copiers, printers and scanners, on a royalty model, priced per
unit sold. During fiscal 2009, we expanded our imaging product
offerings through our June 2009 acquisition of X-Solutions Group
B.V. and September 2009 acquisition of eCopy, Inc.
Research
and Development/Intellectual Property
In recent years, we have developed and acquired extensive
technology assets, intellectual property and industry expertise
in speech and imaging that provide us with a competitive
advantage in our markets. Our technologies are based on complex
algorithms which require extensive amounts of linguistic and
image data, acoustic models and recognition techniques. A
significant investment in capital and time would be necessary to
replicate our current capabilities.
We continue to invest in technologies to maintain our
market-leading position and to develop new applications. Our
technologies are covered by approximately 1,800 issued patents
and 1,600 patent applications. Our intellectual property,
whether purchased or developed internally, is critical to our
success and competitive position and, ultimately, to our market
value. We rely on a portfolio of patents, copyrights,
trademarks, services marks, trade secrets, confidentiality
provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect
our intellectual property and proprietary rights. We incurred
research and development expenses of $119.4 million,
$115.0 million, and $80.0 million in fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
International
Operations
We have principal offices in a number of international locations
including: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hungary, India,
Japan, and the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of our
international operations include research and development,
healthcare transcription and editing, customer support, sales
and marketing and administration. Additionally, we maintain
smaller sales, services and support offices throughout the world
to support our international customers and to expand
international revenue opportunities.
3
Geographic revenue classification is based on the geographic
areas in which our customers are located. For fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, 74%, 77% and 78% of revenue was generated in the
United States and 26%, 23% and 22% of revenue was generated by
our international operations, respectively.
Competition
The individual markets in which we compete are highly
competitive and are subject to rapid technology changes. There
are a number of companies that develop or may develop products
that compete in our target markets; however, currently there is
no one company that competes with us in all of our product
areas. While we expect competition to continue to increase both
from existing competitors and new market entrants, we believe
that we will compete effectively based on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Technological Superiority. Our speech and
imaging technologies, applications and solutions are often
recognized as the most innovative and proficient products in
their respective categories. Our speech technology has
industry-leading recognition accuracy and provides a natural,
speech-enabled interaction with systems, devices and
applications. Our imaging technology is viewed as the most
accurate in the industry. Technology publications, analyst
research and independent benchmarks have consistently indicated
that our products rank at or above performance levels of
alternative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Channels. Our ability to
address the needs of specific markets, such as financial, legal,
healthcare and government, and introduce new products and
solutions quickly and effectively through our extensive global
network of resellers, comprising system integrators, independent
software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors; our dedicated
direct sales force; and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
|
|
|
|
International Appeal. The international reach
of our products is due to the broad language coverage of our
offerings, including our speech technology which provides
recognition for up to 50 languages and dialects and natural
sounding synthesized speech in 26 languages and supports a
broad range of hardware platforms and operating systems. Our
imaging technology supports more than 100 languages.
|
|
|
|
Specialized Professional Services. Our
superior technology, when coupled with the high quality and
domain knowledge of our professional services organization,
allows our customers and partners to place a high degree of
confidence and trust in our ability to deliver results.
|
In our core markets, we compete with companies such as Adobe,
Medquist, Microsoft, Google and Spheris. In addition, a number
of smaller companies in both speech and imaging produce
technologies or products that are competitive with our solutions
in some markets. In certain markets, some of our partners such
as Avaya, Cisco, Genesys and Nortel develop and market products
and services that might be considered substitutes for our
solutions. Current and potential competitors have established,
or may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or
with third parties to increase the ability of their technologies
to address the needs of our prospective customers.
Some of our competitors or potential competitors, such as Adobe,
Microsoft and Google, have significantly greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than we do. These competitors
may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or
emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They
may also devote greater resources to the development, promotion
and sale of their products than we do.
Employees
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately
5,800 full-time employees in total, including approximately
700 in sales and marketing, approximately 1,150 in professional
services, approximately 950 in research and development,
approximately 450 in general and administrative and
approximately 2,550 that provide transcription and editing
services. Approximately 51 percent of our employees are
based outside of the United States, the majority of whom provide
transcription and editing services and are based in India. Our
employees are not represented by any labor union and are not
organized under a collective bargaining agreement, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
4
Company
Information
We were incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the laws
of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance Communications, Inc.
and in November 2005 we changed our ticker symbol to NUAN.
Our website is located at www.nuance.com. This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to these reports, as well as proxy statements
and other information we file with or furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, are accessible free of
charge on our website. We make these documents available as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish
them to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Alternatively, you may access any document we have filed by
visiting the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Except as otherwise stated in these documents, the information
contained on our website or available by hyperlink from our
website is not incorporated by reference into this report or any
other documents we file with or furnish to the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
concentration of operations with one manufacturing partner and
our inability to control expenses related to the manufacturing,
packaging and shipping of our boxed software products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
6
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Accounting
treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net income or
expected revenue in the foreseeable future, which could have a
material and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and, for transactions which closed prior to
October 1, 2009, the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or business. We have allocated
that cost to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including various identifiable intangible assets such
as acquired technology, acquired tradenames and acquired
customer relationships based on their respective fair values.
Intangible assets generally will be amortized over a five to ten
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may
result in an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its
implied fair value. As of September 30, 2009, we had
identified intangible assets of approximately
$706.8 million, net of accumulated amortization, and
goodwill of approximately $1.9 billion. In addition,
purchase accounting limits our ability to recognize certain
revenue that otherwise would have been recognized by the
acquired company as an independent business. The combined
company may delay revenue recognition or recognize less revenue
than we and the acquired company would have recognized as
independent companies.
Changes
in the accounting method for business combinations may have an
adverse impact on our reported or future financial
results.
For the years ended September 30, 2009 and prior, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) 141 Business Combinations,
(SFAS 141), all acquisition-related costs, such
as attorneys fees and accountants fees, as well as
contingent consideration to the seller, which is recorded when
it is beyond a reasonable doubt that the amount is payable, are
capitalized as part of the purchase price.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations,
(SFAS 141R), now referred to as FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 805 (ASC 805), which requires
an acquirer to do the following: expense acquisition-related
costs as incurred; reflect such payments as a reduction of cash
flow from operations; record contingent consideration at fair
value at the acquisition date with subsequent changes in fair
value to be recognized in the income statement and cash flow
from operations. ASC 805 applies to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2009.
ASC 805 may have a material impact on our results of
operations and our financial position due to our acquisition
strategy.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of September 30,
2009, we had a total of $900.7 million of gross debt
outstanding, including $650.3 million in term loans due in
March 2013 and $250.0 million in convertible debentures
which investors may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also
have a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2012. As of September 30, 2009, there were
$16.2 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line but there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of
assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flows. While we have entered into interest rate swap
agreements limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, the
agreements do not offer complete protection from this risk.
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of $12.2 million, $30.1 million
and $14.0 million for the fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. If we are unable to achieve and maintain
profitability, the market price for our stock may decline,
perhaps substantially. We cannot assure you that our revenue
will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitability in
the future. If we do not achieve and maintain profitability, we
may be required to raise additional capital to maintain or grow
our operations. The terms of any transaction to raise additional
capital, if available at all, may be highly dilutive to existing
investors or contain other unfavorable terms, such as a high
interest rate and restrictive covenants.
8
Speech
technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance, which could
limit our ability to grow our speech business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of speech technologies.
The market for speech technologies is relatively new and rapidly
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on the acceptance of speech technologies in
general and our products in particular. The continued
development of the market for our current and future speech
solutions will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using speech
technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in speech technology.
|
Sales of our speech products would be harmed if the market for
speech technologies does not continue to develop or develops
slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business could be
harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with our
investment in our speech technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within speech, we compete with AT&T,
Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers. Within
healthcare dictation and transcription, we compete with Spheris,
Medquist and other smaller providers. Within imaging, we compete
directly with ABBYY, Adobe, I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In speech,
some of our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and
Nortel develop and market products that can be considered
substitutes for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller
companies in both speech and imaging produce technologies or
products that are in some markets competitive with our
solutions. Current and potential competitors have established,
or may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or
with third parties to increase the ability of their technologies
to address the needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as IBM, Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the
9
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Any failure in the effectiveness of our system of internal
control over financial reporting could have a material adverse
impact on our ability to report our financial statements in an
accurate and timely manner, could subject us to regulatory
actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder litigation, or
loss of customer confidence, which could result in an adverse
reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor
confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which
ultimately could negatively impact our stock price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international revenue is generated by sales
in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States and we have
a large number of employees in India that provide transcription
services. A significant portion of the development and
manufacturing of our speech products are conducted in Belgium
and Canada, and a significant portion of our imaging research
and development is conducted in Hungary. We also have
significant research and development resources in Aachen,
Germany, and Vienna, Austria. Accordingly, our future results
could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or declining economic conditions in these countries. In
certain circumstances, we have entered into forward exchange
contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations. We use
these contracts to reduce our risk associated with exchange rate
movements, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset any exchange rate losses or gains on the
hedged transaction. We do not engage in foreign currency
speculation. Forward exchange contracts hedging firm commitments
qualify for hedge accounting when they are designated as a hedge
of the foreign currency exposure and they are effective in
minimizing such exposure. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue and costs projected to increase, we are
exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee and
the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the Euro or other
foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar
could adversely affect future revenue and operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks.
10
Customer relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis
based upon the pattern in which the economic benefits of
customer relationships are being utilized. Other identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives. We assess the potential impairment
of identifiable intangible assets on an annual basis, as well as
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could
trigger an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
could result in additional reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties, contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We recently conducted an analysis of our compliance with the
terms and conditions of certain contracts with the
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).
Based upon our analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of
non-compliance with the terms of two contracts. The final
resolution of this matter may adversely impact our financial
position.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
11
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable
requirements. There can be no assurance that we will not be
subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse
affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject
to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global
economic and political conditions. For example, the direction
and relative strength of the U.S. and global economies have
recently been increasingly uncertain due to softness in housing
markets, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability rating downgrades
of certain investments and declining valuations of others and
continuing geopolitical uncertainties. If economic growth in the
United States and other countries in which we do business is
slowed, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases and
may be unable to obtain credit to finance purchase of our
products. This could result in reduced sales of our products,
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. Any of these events would likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Political instability in any of the major countries
in which we do business would also likely harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Current uncertainty in the global financial markets and economy
may negatively affect our financial results. These macroeconomic
developments could negatively affect our business, operating
results or financial condition in a number of ways which, in
turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A prolonged period
of economic decline could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition and exacerbate
some of the other risk factors described herein. Our customers
may defer purchases of our products, licenses, and services in
response to tighter credit and negative financial news or reduce
their demand for them. Our customers may also not be able to
obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their
ability to make timely payments to us or ultimately cause the
customer to file for protection from creditors under applicable
insolvency or bankruptcy laws. If our customers are not able to
make timely payments to us, our accounts receivable could
increase.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend
against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation,
regardless of the outcome, can be very expensive and can divert
management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
13
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the
markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable them to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of September 30, 2009, Warburg Pincus beneficially owned
approximately 25% of our outstanding common stock, including
warrants exercisable for up to 10,062,422 shares of our
common stock, and 3,562,238 shares of our outstanding
Series B Preferred Stock, each of which is convertible into
one share of our common stock. Because of their large holdings
of our capital stock relative to other stockholders, this
stockholder has a strong influence over matters requiring
approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of the
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
14
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. For example, we issued, and registered for resale,
approximately 4.0 million shares of our common stock in
connection with our September 2009 acquisition of eCopy. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future
sales of shares of common stock, or the availability of shares
of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price
of our common stock.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
15
Our corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and support functions occupy
approximately 201,000 square feet of space that we lease in
Burlington, Massachusetts. We also lease additional properties
in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The
following table summarizes our significant properties as of
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Lease Term
|
|
Primary Use
|
|
|
(approx.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
|
June 2018
|
|
Corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and customer support functions.
|
Redwood City, California (1)
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
July 2012
|
|
Twenty-two percent of this facility is unoccupied, the remainder
has been sublet to third party tenants.
|
Melbourne, Florida
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, customer support and order
fulfillment functions.
|
Montreal, Quebec
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
December 2016
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development,
professional services, customer support functions.
|
Sunnyvale, California
|
|
|
71,000
|
|
|
September 2013
|
|
Administrative, research and development, sales, marketing and
customer support functions.
|
Mahwah, New Jersey
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
June 2015
|
|
Professional services and sales functions.
|
New York, New York (2)
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
February 2016
|
|
Subleased to third-party tenants.
|
Merelbeke, Belgium
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
March 2017
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development and
customer support functions.
|
Budapest, Hungary
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
Research and development.
|
Aachen, Germany
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
Research and development and sales functions
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition in September 2005 of Nuance Communications, Inc,
which we refer to as Former Nuance. |
|
(2) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition of SpeechWorks. |
In addition to the properties referenced above, we also lease a
number of small sales and marketing offices in the United States
and internationally. As of September 30, 2009, we were
productively utilizing substantially all of the space in our
facilities, except for space identified above as unoccupied, or
that has been subleased to third parties.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Like many companies in the software industry, we have from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing
certain intellectual property rights of others. These claims
have been referred to counsel, and they are in various stages of
evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be offered by
all claimants, that the terms of any offered licenses will be
acceptable to us or that in all cases the dispute will be
resolved without litigation, which may be time consuming and
expensive, and may result in injunctive relief or the payment of
damages by us.
In August 2001, the first of a number of complaints was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, on behalf of a purported class of persons who
purchased stock of Former Nuance,
16
which we acquired in September 2005, between April 12, 2000
and December 6, 2000. Those complaints have been
consolidated into one action. The complaint generally alleges
that various investment bank underwriters engaged in improper
and undisclosed activities related to the allocation of shares
in Former Nuances initial public offering of securities.
The complaint makes claims for violation of several provisions
of the federal securities laws against those underwriters, and
also against Former Nuance and some of Former Nuances
directors and officers. Similar lawsuits, concerning more than
250 other companies initial public offerings, were filed
in 2001. In February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss
with respect to the claims against Former Nuance. In the third
quarter of 2003, a proposed settlement in principle was reached
among the plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including Former
Nuance) and the issuers insurance carriers. The settlement
called for the dismissal and release of claims against the
issuer defendants, including Former Nuance, in exchange for a
contingent payment to be paid, if necessary, by the issuer
defendants insurance carriers and an assignment of certain
claims. The settlement was not expected to have any material
impact, as payments, if any, were expected to be made by
insurance carriers, rather than by us. On December 5, 2006,
the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the
Courts order certifying a class in several test
cases that had been selected by the underwriter defendants
and plaintiffs in the coordinated proceeding. The plaintiffs
petitioned the Second Circuit for rehearing of the Second
Circuits decision, however, on April 6, 2007, the
Second Circuit denied the petition for rehearing. At a status
conference on April 23, 2007, the district court suggested
that the issuers settlement could not be approved in its
present form, given the Second Circuits ruling. On
June 25, 2007 the district court issued an order
terminating the settlement agreement. The plaintiffs in the case
have since filed amended master allegations and amended
complaints. On March 26, 2008, the Court largely denied the
defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaints. On
April 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for
preliminary approval of a new proposed settlement between
plaintiffs, the underwriter defendants, the issuer defendants
and the insurers for the issuer defendants. Under the
settlement, which remains subject to Court approval, the
insurers would pay the full amount of the settlement
attributable to Former Nuance, and Former Nuance would not bear
any financial liability. The Court issued an order granting
preliminary approval of the settlement, dated June 9, 2009,
and a hearing on final approval of the settlement was held on
September 10, 2009. On October 5, 2009, the court
issued an opinion granting plaintiffs motion for final
approval of the settlement, approval of the plan of distribution
of the settlement fund and certification of the settlement
classes. On October 20, 2009, a petition for permission to
appeal the courts October 5, 2009 certification of
the settlement classes was filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. Due to the inherent
uncertainties of litigation, we are unable to determine the
ultimate outcome or potential range of loss, if any, associated
with this matter.
We believe that the final outcome of the matter described above
will not have a significant adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail in
this litigation matter, our operating results, financial
position and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
17
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol NUAN. The following table sets
forth, for our fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales
prices of our common stock, in each case as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
17.48
|
|
|
$
|
22.56
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
18.80
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
15.25
|
|
|
|
21.47
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
12.04
|
|
|
|
17.98
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
6.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
|
14.61
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
Holders
As of October 31, 2009, there were 1,168 stockholders of
record of our common stock.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Furthermore, the terms of our credit facility place restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends, except for stock dividends.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not announced any currently effective authorization to
repurchase shares of our common stock.
18
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
$
|
602.0
|
|
|
$
|
388.5
|
|
|
$
|
232.4
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
590.8
|
|
|
|
552.8
|
|
|
|
404.1
|
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
|
|
163.2
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.4
|
)
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
209.8
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
|
|
109.5
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short and long-term marketable
securities
|
|
$
|
527.0
|
|
|
$
|
261.6
|
|
|
$
|
187.0
|
|
|
$
|
112.3
|
|
|
$
|
95.8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,499.6
|
|
|
|
2,846.2
|
|
|
|
2,172.8
|
|
|
|
1,235.1
|
|
|
|
757.2
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
888.6
|
|
|
|
894.2
|
|
|
|
899.9
|
|
|
|
350.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,003.4
|
|
|
|
1,424.9
|
|
|
|
878.3
|
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
|
|
514.7
|
|
Selected Data and Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
376.6
|
|
|
$
|
133.5
|
|
|
$
|
164.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Gross margin percentage
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our core markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from pending and
prior acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of speech,
imaging and keypad solutions for businesses, organizations and
consumers around the world. Our technologies, applications and
services make the user experience more compelling by
transforming the way people interact with devices and systems,
and how they create, share and use documents. Our solutions are
used every day by millions of people and thousands of businesses
for tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient.
Our technologies address our three core markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise. We deliver a portfolio of
solutions that improve the experience of customer
communications, mobile interactions and personal productivity.
Combining our expertise in enterprise and mobile solutions
allows us to help consumers, businesses and manufacturers more
effectively utilize mobile devices for accessing an array of
content, services and capabilities. Our enterprise solutions
help automate a wide range of customer services and business
processes in a variety of information and process-intensive
vertical markets such as telecommunications, financial services,
utilities, travel and entertainment, and government. Our mobile
solutions add voice control and texting capabilities to mobile
devices and services, allowing people to more easily dial a
mobile phone, enter destination information into an automotive
navigation system, dictate a text message or have emails and
screen information read aloud.
|
|
|
|
Healthcare-Dictation. Our healthcare solutions
comprise a portfolio of speech-driven clinical documentation and
communication solutions that help healthcare provider
organizations to reduce operating costs, increase reimbursement,
and enhance patient care and safety. Our solutions automate the
input and management of medical information and are used by many
of the largest hospitals in the United States. We offer a
variety of different solutions and deployment options to address
the specific requirements of different healthcare provider
organizations. Our Dragon NaturallySpeaking family of products
help people and businesses increase productivity by using speech
to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex tasks,
input data, complete forms and automate manual transcription
processes. Our Dragon Medical solution is a desktop application
that provides front-end speech recognition for smaller groups of
physicians and clinicians to create and navigate medical records.
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Our PDF and document imaging
solutions reduce the time and cost associated with creating,
using and sharing documents. Our solutions benefit from the
widespread adoption of the PDF format and the increasing demand
for networked solutions for managing electronic documents. Our
solutions are used by millions of professionals and within large
enterprises.
|
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our network of partners to design and deploy innovative
solutions for businesses and organizations around the globe. We
market and distribute our products
20
through a global network of resellers, including system
integrators, independent software vendors, value-added
resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications carriers and
distributors, and also sell directly through a dedicated sales
force and through our
e-commerce
website.
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of our
solutions can transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, electronic medical records, wireless
and mobile networks and related corporate infrastructure to
conduct business.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to broaden these assets and expand our customer
base through acquisitions. In evaluating the financial condition
and operating performance of our business, management focuses on
revenue, earnings, gross margins, operating margins and cash
flow from operations. A summary of these key financial metrics
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, as compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $81.9 million to
$950.4 million;
|
|
|
|
Net loss decreased by $17.9 million to $12.2 million;
|
|
|
|
Gross margins declined by 1.5 percentage points to 62.2%;
|
|
|
|
Operating margins improved by 2.3 percentage points to
6.1%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
September 30, 2009 was $258.7 million, an increase of
$62.5 million from the same period in the prior fiscal year.
|
Strategy
In fiscal 2010, we will continue to focus on growth by providing
market-leading, value-added solutions for our customers and
partners through a broad set of technologies, service offerings
and channel capabilities. We will also continue to focus on
expense discipline and acquisition synergies to improve gross
margins and operating margins. We intend to pursue growth
through the following key elements of our strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
Extend Technology Leadership. Our solutions
are recognized as among the best in their respective categories.
We intend to leverage our global research and development
organization and broad portfolio of technologies, applications
and intellectual property to foster technological innovation and
maintain customer preference for our solutions. We also intend
to invest in our engineering resources and seek new
technological advancements that further expand the addressable
markets for our solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broaden Expertise in Vertical
Markets. Businesses are increasingly turning to
Nuance for comprehensive solutions rather than for a single
technology product. We intend to broaden our expertise and
capabilities to deliver targeted solutions for a range of
industries including mobile device manufacturers, healthcare,
telecommunications, financial services and government
administration. We also intend to expand our global sales and
professional services capabilities to help our customers and
partners design, integrate and deploy innovative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Increase Subscription and Transaction Based Recurring
Revenue. We intend to increase our subscription
and transaction based offerings in our core markets. The
expansion of our subscription or transaction based solutions
will enable us to deliver applications that our customers use on
a repeat basis, and pay for on a per use basis, providing us
with the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of recurring revenue
streams.
|
|
|
|
Expand Global Presence. We intend to further
expand our international resources to better serve our global
customers and partners and to leverage opportunities in emerging
markets such as Asia and Latin America. We continue to add
regional executives and sales employees in different geographic
regions to better address demand for speech based solutions and
services.
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We have
selectively pursued strategic acquisitions to expand our
technology, solutions and resources to complement our organic
growth. We have proven experience in integrating businesses and
technologies and in delivering enhanced value to our customers,
partners, employees and shareholders. We intend to continue to
pursue acquisitions that enhance our solutions, serve specific
vertical markets and strengthen our technology portfolio.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
|
|
51.8
|
%
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
|
|
60.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Total
Revenue
The following tables show total revenue from our three core
market groups and revenue by geographic location, based on the
location of our customers, in dollars and percentage change
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise
|
|
$
|
462.3
|
|
|
$
|
438.8
|
|
|
$
|
246.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
77.8
|
%
|
Healthcare-Dictation
|
|
|
418.4
|
|
|
|
349.8
|
|
|
|
281.3
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
$
|
602.0
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
706.9
|
|
|
$
|
669.3
|
|
|
$
|
471.6
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
243.5
|
|
|
|
199.2
|
|
|
|
130.4
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
$
|
602.0
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in total revenue for fiscal 2009, as compared to
fiscal 2008, was driven by a combination of organic growth and
contributions from acquisitions. Mobile-Enterprise revenue
increased $23.5 million, primarily driven by contributions
from our acquisition of SNAPin, as well as growth in our hosted,
on-demand solutions. Healthcare-Dictation revenue increased
$68.6 million, primarily driven by contributions from our
acquisitions of eScription and PSRS, and organic growth of our
iChart transcription solution. Imaging revenue decreased
$10.2 million primarily due to a decline in Windows-based
software sales and a general decline in corporate spending due
to current economic conditions.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
fiscal 2009 was 74% of total revenue in the United States and
26% internationally, as compared to 77% of total revenue in the
United States and 23% internationally for the same period last
year. The increase in the proportion of revenue generated
internationally was primarily due to contributions from our
acquisition of PSRS near the end of fiscal 2008.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in total revenue for fiscal 2008, as compared to
fiscal 2007, was driven by a combination of organic growth and
contributions from acquisitions. Mobile-Enterprise revenue
increased $192.0 million, primarily driven by contributions
from our acquisitions of BeVocal, Viecore, Tegic and
VoiceSignal. Healthcare-Dictation revenue increased
$68.5 million, primarily due to contributions from our
acquisitions of Focus, Commissure, Vocada and eScription.
Imaging revenue increased $6.0 million.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
fiscal 2008 was 77% of total revenue in the United States and
23% internationally, as compared to 78% of total revenue in the
United States and 22% internationally for the prior year. The
slight decrease in proportion of revenue generated in the United
States was primarily due to acquisitions that have a higher
proportion of their revenue derived from customers outside of
the United States.
23
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
373.4
|
|
|
$
|
414.4
|
|
|
$
|
311.8
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
|
|
51.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2009,
as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted of a $27.8 million
decrease in Mobile-Enterprise revenue primarily due to customers
migrating to our on-demand services solutions and an
$11.3 million decrease in Imaging revenue primarily due to
a decline in Windows-based software sales and a general decline
in corporate spending due to current economic conditions.
Healthcare-Dictation product and licensing revenue decreased
slightly primarily due to decreased consumer spending in our
non-medical sales of Dragon NaturallySpeaking, as well as,
customers continued migration to our on-demand service
solutions, this decrease was partially offset by the positive
revenue impact of our acquisition of PSRS in September 2008. As
a percentage of total revenue, product and licensing revenue
decreased 8.4 percentage points primarily due to changes in
revenue mix attributable to the accelerated growth in
professional services and hosting revenue relative to product
and licensing revenue.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2008,
as compared to fiscal 2007, consisted of a $90.7 million
increase in Mobile-Enterprise revenue primarily due to
contributions from our acquisitions of VoiceSignal and Tegic,
and a $5.5 million increase in Imaging revenue.
Healthcare-Dictation revenue increased by $6.4 million,
including contributions from the acquisition of Commissure, and
the release of Dragon NaturallySpeaking Version 10 in the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2008, but partially offset by a decline in
healthcare product and licensing revenue as customers migrated
to our iChart hosted services solution. As a percentage of total
revenue, product and licensing revenue decreased
4.1 percentage points primarily due to changes in revenue
mix attributable to the accelerated growth in professional
services and hosting revenue relative to product and licensing
revenue.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted
transcription and dictation services over a specified term, as
well as self-service, on-demand offerings to carriers and
enterprises. The following table shows professional services and
hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
411.4
|
|
|
$
|
305.5
|
|
|
$
|
165.5
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted of a
$61.8 million increase in Healthcare-Dictation revenue,
including contributions from our acquisition of
24
eScription and organic growth of our iChart transcription
solution. Additionally, there was a $44.1 million increase
in Mobile-Enterprise revenue, primarily due to contributions
from our acquisition of SNAPin, and growth in our hosted,
on-demand solutions. The growth in these organic and acquired
revenue streams outpaced the relative growth of our other
revenue types, resulting in an 8.1 percentage point
increase in professional services and hosting revenue as a
percentage of total revenue.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2008, as compared fiscal 2007, consisted of an
$88.3 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise revenue,
including contributions from our acquisitions of BeVocal and
Viecore. Additionally, there was a $51.8 million increase
in Healthcare-Dictation revenue, primarily due to contributions
from our acquisitions of Focus, Vocada and eScription, and to
the growth of our iChart transcription solution. The growth in
these organic and acquired revenue streams outpaced the relative
growth of our other revenue types, resulting in a
7.7 percentage point increase in professional services and
hosting revenue as a percentage of total revenue.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
165.6
|
|
|
$
|
148.6
|
|
|
$
|
124.6
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2009,
as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted primarily of an
$8.7 million increase related to the expansion of our
current installed base of Healthcare-Dictation solutions, and a
$7.2 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise maintenance and
support revenue, driven by organic growth.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2008,
as compared to fiscal 2007, consisted primarily of a
$13.2 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise maintenance and
support revenue, driven by a combination of organic growth and
growth from our acquisition of Viecore, and a $10.4 million
increase related to the expansion of our current installed base
of Healthcare-Dictation solutions. As a percentage of total
revenue, maintenance and support revenue decreased by
3.6 percentage points, primarily due to changes in revenue
mix attributable to the accelerated growth in professional
services and hosting revenue relative to maintenance and support
revenue.
25
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily due to a
$4.7 million decrease in Healthcare-Dictation costs, a
$2.7 million decrease in Imaging costs and a
$1.0 million decrease in Mobile-Enterprise costs as a
result of customer migration to hosted, on-demand solutions and
declining Windows-based license revenues. The cost of product
and licensing revenue decreased as a percentage of revenue due
to a change in the revenue mix towards products with higher
margins.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Cost of product and licensing revenue increased
$2.5 million for fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007,
primarily due to increased royalty expense associated with our
Imaging product and partially offset by reduced
Healthcare-Dictation costs. Cost of product and licensing
revenue decreased as a percentage of product and licensing
revenue primarily due to increased product and licensing revenue
related to recent acquisitions that do not carry significant
related costs, and, to a lesser extent, to a change in the
revenue mix towards products with higher margins.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our subscription and hosted,
on-demand solutions. The following table shows cost of
professional services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of professional services and hosting revenue (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
254.8
|
|
|
$
|
214.0
|
|
|
$
|
114.2
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
87.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
|
|
69.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was
primarily due to a $36.2 million increase in
Mobile-Enterprise costs driven by our acquisition of SNAPin and
a $4.5 million increase in Healthcare-Dictation
professional services and hosting costs driven by a full year
impact of our acquisitions of eScription and PSRS in late fiscal
2008. As a percentage of revenue, cost of professional services
and hosting revenue decreased due to faster growth in our higher
margin hosted, on-demand solutions.
26
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in the cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, was
primarily driven by the Mobile-Enterprise acquisition of
Viecore, the full year impact of the fiscal 2007
Healthcare-Dictation acquisition of Focus, as well as organic
growth in the core business. The cost of professional services
and hosting revenue increased modestly in fiscal 2008, as a
percentage of the related revenue, as we increased spending to
support our current and future growth, particularly in our
hosted, on-demand solutions. These solutions require
infrastructure spending in advance of the revenue.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.5
|
|
|
$
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily due to a
$1.7 million decrease in Healthcare-Dictation costs as a
result of effective cost containment actions, offset by an
increase in costs associated with our acquisitions of eScription
and PSRS. As a percentage of revenue, cost of maintenance and
support revenue decreased due to effective cost controls in our
core business and changes in the overall revenue mix.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, was primarily due to a
$2.2 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise related to the
acquisition of Viecore and $1.1 million increase in
Healthcare-Dictation related to the acquisitions of Vocada and
Commissure. The cost of maintenance and support revenue as a
percentage of the related revenue decreased by
0.8 percentage points.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
$
|
119.4
|
|
|
$
|
115.0
|
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, primarily consisted of a
$5.7 million increase in infrastructure investment to
support ongoing research and development projects, as well as a
$2.5 million increase in compensation expense attributable
to the additional headcount from our acquisitions during the
period. This increase is partially offset by a reduction of
$3.0 million related to temporary employees and
professional services. To date, we have not capitalized any
internal software development
27
costs as costs incurred after technological feasibility, but
before release of our licensed software products, and
development work related to our on-demand solutions have not
been significant.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, primarily consisted of a
$28.9 million in compensation expense attributable to the
additional headcount from our acquisitions during the period,
and a $3.6 million increase in temporary employees and
professional services to support ongoing research and
development projects. The remaining increase is related to
infrastructure investment.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
219.2
|
|
|
$
|
231.2
|
|
|
$
|
184.9
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to a
$4.9 million decrease in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions and travel expenses, a
$4.6 million decrease in marketing program spending and a
$1.3 million decrease in temporary employees and
professional services. Sales and marketing expense as a
percentage of total revenue decreased by 3.5 percentage
points, as a result of increased cost efficiencies of our sales
and marketing expenditures.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2008, as
compared to fiscal 2007, was primarily attributable to a
$39.9 million increase in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions, stock-based compensation and travel
expenses related to increased headcount from our acquisitions
during the period, and a $5.0 million increase in marketing
program spending. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of
total revenue decreased by 4.1 percentage points, as a
result of increased cost efficiencies of our sales and marketing
expenditures and a reduction of the share-based compensation
relative to the increase in revenue.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors including accountants and
attorneys, insurance, and provisions for doubtful accounts. The
following table shows general and administrative expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
112.1
|
|
|
$
|
105.9
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
40.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to
increased legal costs of $11.4 million associated with
acquisition and integration activities. This increase is
partially offset by a reduction of $2.4 million in bad debt
expense resulting from improved collection and a
$2.6 million decrease in expenses related to temporary
employees and professional services as a result of cost
containment efforts and acquisition related synergies.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was primarily attributable to
increased compensation and stock-based compensation of
$20.9 million associated with our 2008 acquisitions. An
additional $5.1 million increase in general and
administrative expenses related to temporary employees and
professional services in order to support the incremental
requirements resulting from our growth from acquisitions, and
$3.6 million related to increased third-party legal fees.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired tradenames and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefit of customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
38.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
|
86.3
|
%
|
Operating expense
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
136.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
115.4
|
|
|
$
|
82.6
|
|
|
$
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
119.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2009, compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to the
amortization of acquired customer relationship and core
technology intangible assets from our acquisitions of eScription
in May 2008, PSRS in September 2008, SNAPin in October 2008, and
our acquisitions during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Fiscal
2009 amortization expense also increased over fiscal 2008 due to
our acquisition and licensing of certain technology from other
third-parties during 2009.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2008, compared to fiscal 2007, was primarily attributable to the
amortization of acquired customer relationships and core
technology from our acquisitions in fiscal 2008 and 2007, as
well as new technology licensed in fiscal 2008. The amortization
expense in fiscal 2008 included $3.6 million representing
impairment charges recorded from our review of our ability to
realize future cash flows relating to certain of our intangible
assets. We did not record any impairment charges in fiscal 2007.
Based on our balance of amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2009, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect amortization of intangible assets
for fiscal 2010 to be $126.2 million
29
In-Process
Research and Development
In fiscal 2008, we recorded in-process research and development
charges of $2.6 million in connection with our acquisition
of PSRS. We did not have any in-process research and development
charges for any other acquisitions completed in fiscal 2009,
2008 or 2007. The value assigned to in-process research and
development was determined using an income approach by
estimating the costs to develop the acquired technologies into
commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash
flows from the projects and discounting the net cash flows to
their present values. At the date of acquisition, the
development of these projects had not yet reached technological
feasibility, and the research and development in progress had no
alternative future uses. The rates utilized to discount the net
cash flows to their present value were based on a number of
factors, including our estimated costs of capital. Due to the
nature of the forecasts and the risks associated with the
projected growth and profitability of these projects, discount
rates of 25% to 35% were considered appropriate.
Restructuring
and Other Charges (Credits), Net
For fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, composed primarily of $5.3 million
related to the elimination of approximately 220 personnel
across multiple functions within our company.
For fiscal 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$7.0 million, of which $4.2 million related to the
elimination of approximately 155 personnel across multiple
functions, $1.4 million related to a non-recurring, adverse
ruling arising from a vendors claims of underpayment of
historical royalties for technology discontinued in 2005 and
$1.4 million related to the consolidation or elimination of
excess facilities.
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(40.1
|
)
|
|
|
(55.2
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)%
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The change in other income (expense), net for fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily driven by gains on
foreign currency forward contracts. During the three months
ended December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency
forward contracts to manage exposure on our Euro-denominated
deferred acquisition payment obligation of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS. The
deferred acquisition payment was paid on October 22, 2009.
These foreign currency contracts were not designated as hedges
and changes in fair value of these contracts were reported in
net earnings as other income (expense). For fiscal 2009, we
recorded a net $8.0 million gain as other income related to
these contracts and the related Euro-denominated obligation. In
addition, gains on other derivative instruments of
$2.3 million were partially offset by a $1.2 million
impairment charge taken on our cost method investment in a
non-public company during the period. Interest income was lower
in fiscal 2009 due to lower prevailing market interest rates.
Interest expense was similarly lower during fiscal 2009 driven
by a decrease in the prevailing average interest rates during
the year related to our variable-interest rate borrowings.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The increase in interest income for fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007 was primarily due to higher cash balances, partially
offset by lower interest rates during fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007. The increase in interest expense was mainly due to
the increase in our term loan borrowings and the
$250.0 million convertible debentures that we issued in
August 2007. Included in interest expense was $5.2 million
in fiscal 2008 and $4.2 million in fiscal 2007 of non-cash
interest expense mainly related to imputed interest in
association with certain lease obligations included in our
accrued business combination costs and accrued restructuring
charges, and the amortization of debt issuance costs and
unamortized discount associated with our debt. Other income
(expense), net principally consisted of foreign exchange gains
(losses) as a result of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
certain of our foreign subsidiaries who have transactions
denominated in currencies other than their functional
currencies, as well as the remeasurement of certain of our
intercompany balances.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (in thousands of dollars, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
176.7
|
%
|
|
|
(35.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
143.3
|
%
|
|
|
(93.8
|
)%
|
|
|
265.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Our effective income tax rate was 143.3% and (93.8)% for fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the rate was due
primarily to the increase in our valuation allowance with
respect to certain deferred tax assets. This was partially
offset by an $8.0 million charge recorded in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 upon our election to treat the eScription
acquisition as an asset purchase. This charge in fiscal 2009
represented the reversal of tax benefits associated with a
Massachusetts state tax law enactment recorded in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008 when the eScription acquisition was
treated as a stock purchase
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The effective income tax rate was (93.8)% and 265.1% for fiscal
2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax
rate was due primarily to the $20.4 million tax benefit
associated with the enactment of the Massachusetts state tax law
enactment, which impacted the tax rate applied to certain
deferred tax liabilities associated with intangible assets and
results in these liabilities being taxed at a lower effective
tax rate when reversed in future periods. This benefit was
partially offset by changes in the valuation allowance with
respect to certain deferred tax assets.
Our utilization of deferred tax assets that were acquired in a
business combination (primarily net operating loss
carryforwards) will reduce goodwill, intangible assets, and to
the extent remaining, the provision for income taxes, until our
adoption of the business combination accounting guidance in ASC
805 on October 1, 2009; after which time the reductions in
the allowance, if any, will be recorded as a tax benefit in the
statement of operations. Our establishment of new deferred tax
assets as a result of operating activities requires the
establishment of valuation allowances based upon more
likely than not realization criteria. The establishment of
a valuation allowance relating to operating activities is
recorded as an increase to tax expense.
Our tax provision also includes state and foreign tax expense,
which is determined on either a legal entity or separate tax
jurisdiction basis.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $527.0 million as of
September 30, 2009, an increase of $265.5 million as
compared to $261.5 million as of September 30, 2008.
Our working capital was $376.6 million as of
September 30, 2009 as compared to $133.5 million as
September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, our
total accumulated deficit was $247.3 million. We do not
expect our accumulated deficit to impact our future ability to
operate the business given our strong cash and operating cash
flow positions, and believe our current cash and cash
equivalents on-hand are sufficient to meet our operating needs
for at least the next twelve months.
Cash
provided by operating activities
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2009 was
$258.7 million, an increase of $62.5 million, or 32%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$196.2 million for fiscal 2008. The increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses
of $47.8 million primarily attributable to the timing of
cash payments under our normal operating cycles;
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash resulting from a decrease in net loss,
exclusive of non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$65.7 million mainly attributable to improvement in our
operating margins, as well as the decrease in cash interest
expense on our variable rate debt attributable to lower variable
interest rates during fiscal 2009;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash of $10.1 million from prepaid expenses
and other assets attributable to individually insignificant
fluctuations in prepaid expenses related to our normal
operations; and
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash of $28.5 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to the significant collection
of acquired unbilled accounts receivable during fiscal 2008 and
the timing of cash collections.
|
Fiscal
2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2008 was
$196.2 million, an increase of $89.8 million, or 84%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$106.4 million for fiscal 2007. The net increase was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$46.2 million, primarily attributable to the timing of cash
payments under our normal operating cycles;
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash resulting from a decrease in our net loss,
exclusive of non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$46.7 million mainly attributable to improvements in our
operating margins, offset by an increase in cash interest
expense resulting from our term loan and convertible notes being
outstanding for the full fiscal 2008;
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash of $9.3 million resulting from
increased deferred revenue; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash of $76.3 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to the significant collection
of acquired unbilled accounts receivable and the timing of cash
collections during fiscal 2008.
|
Cash used
in investing activities
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2009 was
$184.6 million, a decrease of $261.5 million, or 59%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$446.1 million for fiscal 2008. The net decrease was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash payments related to acquisitions of
$293.4 million, primarily driven by the cash payment of
$330.9 million to acquire eScription in May 2008; and
|
|
|
|
an increase of $29.4 million in cash payments to acquire
speech-related patent portfolios and a royalty-free
paid-up
perpetual license to speech-related source code.
|
Fiscal
2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2008 was
$446.1 million, a decrease of $131.6 million, or 23%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$577.7 million for fiscal 2007. The decrease was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $171.8 million in cash payments related to
acquisitions, primarily driven by the cash payments of
$469.5 million for Tegic and VoiceSignal in fiscal 2007
compared to $330.9 million to acquire eScription in fiscal
2008; and
|
|
|
|
an increase of $29.0 million in cash payments for third
party licenses and capitalized patent defense costs.
|
Cash
provided by financing activities
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2009 was
$189.4 million, a decrease of $137.7 million, or 42%,
as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$327.1 million for fiscal 2008. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $135.0 million in cash proceeds from the sale
of our common stock. During fiscal 2009, we sold
17.4 million shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase 3.9 million shares of our common stock for net
proceeds of $175.1 million as compared to a sale of
19.2 million shares of our common stock
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
and warrants to purchase 3.7 million shares of our common
stock for net proceeds of $330.6 million during fiscal 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $6.6 million in cash payments to net share
settle employee equity awards, due to a decrease in the
intrinsic value of the shares vested as a result of the overall
decrease in our stock price in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal
2008; and
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $8.3 million in cash proceeds from the
issuance of common stock upon exercise of employee stock options
and pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan, due to a
decrease in the number of options exercised during fiscal 2009
as compared to fiscal 2008.
|
Fiscal
2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2008 was
$327.1 million, a decrease of $214.4 million, or 40%,
as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$541.5 million for fiscal 2007. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $330.6 million in cash proceeds from the
sale of our common stock. During fiscal 2008, we sold
19.2 million shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase 3.7 million shares of our common stock for net
proceeds of $330.6 million. There were no corresponding
issuances of common stock during fiscal 2007;
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $551.4 million in cash received from new
borrowings. In fiscal 2007, we received proceeds from our Credit
Facility and the issuance of our 2.75% Convertible Senior
Debentures, while we did not raise any significant funds through
borrowings in fiscal 2008; and
|
|
|
|
an increase of $18.7 million related to deferred
acquisition payments made in fiscal 2007 for an acquisition
consummated in fiscal 2005., and not made in fiscal 2008. We did
not make any deferred payments of this nature in fiscal 2008.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in 2027 (the 2027
Debentures) in a private placement to Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Total proceeds,
net of debt discount of $7.5 million and deferred debt
issuance costs of $1.1 million, were $241.4 million.
The 2027 Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum,
payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15,
2008, and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of
the holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the
2027 Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. The
related debt discount and debt issuance costs are being
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate
method through August 2014. As of September 30, 2009 and
2008, the ending unamortized discount was $5.2 million and
$6.3 million, respectively, and the ending unamortized
deferred debt issuance costs were $0.7 million and
$0.8 million, respectively. The 2027 Debentures are general
senior unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of
payment to all of our existing and future unsecured,
unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to
any indebtedness that is contractually subordinated to the 2027
Debentures. The 2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to
our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally
subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our
subsidiaries. If converted, the principal amount of the 2027
Debentures is payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess
of the $250 million principal amount, will (based on an
initial conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion
price of $19.47 per share, subject to adjustment as defined) be
paid in cash or shares of our common stock, at our election,
only in the following circumstances and to the following extent:
(i) on any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter;
(ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied
34
by the then current conversion rate; (iii) upon the
occurrence of specified corporate transactions, as described in
the indenture for the 2027 Debentures; and (iv) at the
option of the holder at any time on or after February 15,
2027. Additionally, we may redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole
or in part, on or after August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued
and unpaid interest; each holder shall have the right, at such
holders option, to require us to repurchase all or any
portion of the 2027 Debentures held by such holder on
August 15, 2014, August 15, 2017 and August 15,
2022. Upon conversion, we will pay cash and shares of our common
stock (or, at our election, cash in lieu of some or all of such
common stock), if any. If we undergo a fundamental change (as
described in the indenture for the 2027 Debentures) prior to
maturity, holders will have the option to require us to
repurchase all or any portion of their debentures for cash at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures to
be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including any
additional interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As
of September 30, 2009, no conversion triggers were met. If
the conversion triggers were met, we could be required to repay
all or some of the principal amount in cash prior to the
maturity date.
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which consists of a $75 million
revolving credit line including letters of credit, a
$355 million term loan entered into on March 31, 2006,
a $90 million term loan entered into on April 5, 2007
and a $225 million term loan entered into on
August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility). The term
loans are due March 2013 and the revolving credit line is due
March 2012. As of September 30, 2009, $650.3 million
remained outstanding under the term loans, there were
$16.2 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate
equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) the base rate (which is the higher of the corporate
base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate
plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR (equal to (i) the
British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rates for
deposits in U.S. dollars divided by (ii) one minus the
statutory reserves applicable to such borrowing). The applicable
margin for term loan borrowings under the Credit Facility ranges
from 0.75% to 1.50% per annum with respect to base rate
borrowings and from 1.75% to 2.50% per annum with respect to
LIBOR-based borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio. The
applicable margin for revolving loan borrowings under the Credit
Facility ranges from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum with respect to
base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our leverage
ratio. As of September 30, 2009, our applicable margin for
the term loan was 1.00% for base rate borrowings and 2.00% for
LIBOR-based borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee
for unutilized commitments under the revolving credit facility
at a rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our
leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2009, the commitment
fee rate was 0.375% and the effective interest rate was 2.27%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method through March 2012 for costs
associated with the revolving credit facility and through March
2013 for costs associated with the term loan. As of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the ending unamortized
deferred financing fees were $7.7 million and
$10.0 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility is subject to repayment in four equal
quarterly installments of 1% per annum ($6.7 million per
year, not including interest, which is also payable quarterly),
and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined in the Credit
Facility, which is payable beginning in the first quarter of
each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2008, based on the excess
cash flow generated in the previous fiscal year. No payment
under the excess cash flow sweep provision was due in the first
quarter of either fiscal 2009 or fiscal 2010 as there was no
excess cash flow generated
35
in either of the respective prior fiscal years. We will continue
to evaluate the extent to which a payment is due in the first
quarter of future fiscal years based on excess cash flow
generation. At the current time, we are unable to predict the
amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow sweep provisions. Any term loan borrowings not paid
through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or
any other mandatory or optional payments that we may make, will
be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are
made, the annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans
repaid would be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
650,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100%
of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings
under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and cash equivalents on hand will be sufficient to meet our
working capital, investing, financing and contractual
obligations and the contingent payments for acquisitions, if any
are realized, as they become due for at least the next twelve
months. We also believe that in the event future operating
results are not as planned, that we could take actions,
including restructuring actions and other cost reduction
initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels which, in
combination with expected future revenue, will continue to
generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the event that these
actions are not effective in generating operating cash flows we
may be required to issue equity or debt securities on terms that
may be less favorable.
36
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of September 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
and 2012
|
|
|
and 2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Credit Facility(2)
|
|
$
|
650.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
$
|
630.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(1)
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under 2.75% Convertible Senior
Debentures(3)
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Other lease obligations associated with the closing of duplicate
facilities related to restructurings and acquisitions(4)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, minimum funding requirement(5)
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments(6)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities assumed(7)
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,168.8
|
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
|
$
|
122.3
|
|
|
$
|
936.3
|
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders of the 2.75% Senior Convertible Debentures have the
right to require us to repurchase the debentures on
August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest is due and payable monthly under the Credit Facility,
and principal is paid on a quarterly basis. The amounts included
as interest payable in this table are based on the effective
interest rate as of September 30, 2009 related to the
Credit Facility excluding the effect of our interest rate swaps. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest is due and payable semi-annually under the 2.75%
convertible senior debentures. |
|
(4) |
|
Obligations include contractual lease commitments related to
facilities that were part of restructuring plans entered into in
fiscal 2005, 2008 and 2009. As of September 30, 2009, total
gross lease obligations are $3.0 million and are included
in the contractual obligations herein. The remaining
$5.6 million in obligations represent contractual lease
commitments associated with the implemented plans to eliminate
duplicate facilities in conjunction with our acquisitions. As of
September 30, 2009, we have subleased certain of the
facilities to unrelated third parties with total sublease income
of $3.0 million through fiscal 2013. |
|
(5) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 ($1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2009) for each of the next 5 years,
through fiscal 2014. |
|
(6) |
|
These amounts include non-cancelable purchase commitments for
inventory in the normal course of business to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog. |
|
(7) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities relating to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor companies
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of Former Nuance in September
2005. These restructuring programs related to the closing of two
facilities with lease terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012,
respectively. Total contractual obligations under these two
leases are $47.7 million. As of September 30, 2009, we
have
sub-leased
certain of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under contractual
terms is expected to be $14.5 million, which ranges from
$1.5 million to $3.2 million on an annualized basis
through 2016. |
As a result of our adoption of FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), now referred to
as ASC
740-10, on
October 1, 2007, our gross liability for unrecognized tax
benefits was approximately $2.5 million. The gross
liability as of September 30, 2009 was
37
$12.1 million. We do not expect a significant change in the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next
12 months. We estimate that approximately $1.1 million
of this amount may be paid within the next year and we are
currently unable to reasonably estimate the timing of payments
for the remainder of the liability.
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have agreed
to make contingent cash payments to the former shareholders of
certain of the acquired companies. The following represents the
contingent cash payments that we may be required to make.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $45.0 million in
cash, to be paid, if at all, based on the business achieving
certain performance targets that are measurable from the
acquisition date to December 31, 2009. Additionally, we
would be required to issue earn-out consideration to SNAPin
option holders. This option earn-out consideration, if earned,
is payable at our sole discretion in cash, stock or additional
options to purchase common stock. The total value of this option
earn-out consideration may aggregate up to $2.5 million,
which will be recorded as compensation expense over the service
period, if earned. These earn-out payments, if any would be
payable upon the final measurement of the performance targets.
As of September 30, 2009, we have recorded approximately
$12.9 million related to the contingent earn-out provisions
as additional purchase price.
In connection with our acquisition of PSRS, a deferred cash
payment of 44.3 million ($64.6 million based on
the exchange rate as of September 30, 2009) was due
per the asset purchase agreement on September 21, 2009. We
paid the deferred acquisition payment on October 22, 2009.
The purchase price was finalized in November 2009 based on a
final working capital adjustment agreed between us and the
former shareholder of PSRS, reducing the final purchase price by
1.4 million ($2.1 million based on exchange rate
at September 30, 2009), reflective of the amount agreed to
be paid to us by the former shareholder of PSRS.
In connection with our acquisition of Multi-Vision, we agreed to
make contingent earn-out payments of up to $15.0 million,
payable in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, relating to
certain provisions as described in the share purchase agreement.
Two-thirds of the earn-out is conditioned on performance targets
and continued employment; accordingly, up to $10.0 million
of any earn-out payments that become payable will be recorded to
compensation expense, and up to $5.0 million, the portion
of the prospective earn-out attributable solely to performance
targets, will be recorded as additional purchase price and
allocated to goodwill. As of September 30, 2009, we have
not recorded any obligation or compensation expense relative to
these measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to an additional
$21.0 million upon the achievement of certain financial
targets measured over defined periods through December 31,
2010, in accordance with the merger agreement. Payments, if any,
will be made in the form of cash or shares of our common stock,
at our sole discretion. We have notified the former shareholders
of Vocada that the financial targets for certain periods were
not achieved. The former shareholders of Vocada have requested
additional information regarding this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of Vocada
regarding this matter. As of September 30, 2009, we have
not recorded any obligation relative to these measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Commissure, we agreed to
make contingent earn-out payments of up to $8.0 million
upon the achievement of certain financial targets for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010, in
accordance with the merger agreement. Payments, if any, may be
made in the form of cash or shares of our common stock, at our
sole discretion. We have notified the former shareholders of
Commissure that the financial targets for fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, were not achieved and the related
contingent earn-out payment was not earned. Through
September 30, 2009, we have not recorded any obligation
relative to these measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic) in February 2005, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of $35.0 million upon
achievement of certain established financial and performance
targets, in accordance with the merger agreement. We have
notified the former shareholders of Phonetic that the financial
and performance targets were not achieved. Accordingly, we have
not recorded any obligations relative to
38
these measures as of September 30, 2009. The former
shareholders of Phonetic have objected to this determination and
have filed for arbitration.
Financial
Instruments
We use financial instruments to manage our interest rate and
foreign exchange risk. We follow Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for
Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities, now referred to as Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 815 (ASC 815), for
certain designated forward contracts and interest rate swaps.
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009, we have two outstanding interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional
amount of $200 million. The interest rates on these swaps
are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit
Facility, and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010,
respectively. As of September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, the aggregate cumulative unrealized
losses related to these swaps, and a previous swap that matured
on March 31, 2009, were $4.0 million and
$0.9 million, respectively.
On December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars. These contracts expired in September 2009 and
were designated as cash flow hedges. The impact of these settled
contracts on results of operations and other comprehensive
income are detailed in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. We have no foreign currency contracts designated as
cash flow hedges outstanding at September 30, 2009.
We have foreign currency contracts that are not designated as
hedges. Changes in fair value of foreign currency contracts not
qualifying as hedges are reported in earnings as part of other
income (expense), net. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency forward
contracts to offset foreign currency exposure on the deferred
acquisition payment of 44.3 million related to our
acquisition of PSRS, resulting in a net gain of
$8.0 million in other income (expense).
In June 2009, we acquired certain intangible assets and issued
1,809,353 shares of our common stock, valued at
$25.0 million, as part of the total consideration. We also
issued an additional 315,790 shares of our common stock,
valued at $4.5 million, in June 2009 as a prepayment for
professional services. These shares issued are subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives, and are being accounted for separately from their
host agreements due to the determination that such instruments
would not be considered equity instruments if freestanding. The
security price guarantees require a payment from, either, us to
the third party or from the third party to us based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, increases in fair value of
$2.3 million related to these security price guarantees are
reported in earnings as non-operating income within other income
(expense), net.
In October 2009, we entered into a five-year joint research
collaboration with a third party and made payments related to
the first year of service consisting of 1,047,120 shares of
our common stock valued at $16.0 million. These shares
issued are subject to security price guarantees of the same
nature as those described above.
Pension
Plans
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain
significant defined benefit pension plans in connection with our
acquisition of Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and
death benefits for former Dictaphone employees located in the
United Kingdom and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to
new participants. These plans require periodic cash
contributions. The Canadian plan is fully funded and expected to
remain fully funded during fiscal 2010, without additional
funding by us. In fiscal 2009, total cash funding for the UK
pension plan was $1.3 million. For the UK pension plan, we
have a minimum funding requirement of £859,900
(approximately $1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2009) for each of the next five years,
through fiscal 2014.
39
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through September 30, 2009, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; accounting for patent legal defense costs;
the costs to complete the development of custom software
applications; the valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and
tangible long-lived assets; accounting for business
combinations; share-based payments; valuation of derivative
instruments; accounting for income taxes and related valuation
allowances; and loss contingencies. Our management bases its
estimates on historical experience, market participant fair
value considerations and various other factors that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies most
significantly affect the portrayal of our financial condition
and results of operations and require our most difficult and
subjective judgments.
Revenue Recognition. We derive revenue from
the following sources: (1) software license agreements,
including royalty and other usage-based arrangements,
(2) post-contract customer support, (3) fixed and
variable fee hosting arrangements and (4) professional
services. Our revenue recognition policies for these revenue
streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has the contractual right to
take possession of the software or technology at its sole
discretion and without undue economic cost or burden. In select
situations, we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with, or in place of, embedding our intellectual
property in software. We recognize revenue from the sale or
license of software products and licensing of technology when
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
(ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is probable.
Vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair
value for software and software-related services exists when a
company can support what the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged by the company when the same elements are sold
separately. VSOE of fair value is required, generally, in order
to separate the accounting for various elements in a software
and related services arrangement. We have, in general,
established VSOE of fair value of our post-contract customer
support (PCS), professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to three years. Revenue from PCS is
recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the term that
the maintenance service is provided.
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
For revenue arrangements with multiple elements that are not
considered to be software or software-related, we allocate an
arrangements fees into separate units of accounting based
on fair value. We generally support fair value of our
deliverables based upon the prices we charge when we sell
similar elements separately.
40
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, or
the expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by classifying the fair value of professional service revenue as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot estimate historical returns from these distributors and
resellers; and therefore, cannot use such estimates as the basis
upon which to estimate future sales returns. As a result, we
recognize revenue from sales to these distributors and resellers
when the products are sold through to retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to end-users, we make an
estimate of sales returns based on historical experience. The
provision for these estimated returns is recorded as a reduction
of revenue and accounts receivable at the time that the related
revenue is recorded. If actual returns differ significantly from
our estimates, such differences could have a material impact on
our results of operations for the period in which the actual
returns become known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Our revenue recognition policies require management to make
significant estimates. Management analyzes various factors,
including a review of specific transactions, historical
experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and
economic conditions. Changes in judgments based upon these
factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue and cost
recognized and thus affects our results of operations and
financial condition.
Business Combinations. We determine and
allocate the purchase price of an acquired company to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as well as to in-process research and development as
41
of the business combination date. The purchase price allocation
process requires us to use significant estimates and
assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business
combination date including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to complete any in-process research and
development projects;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
estimated value of restructuring liabilities to reorganize the
acquirees pre-acquisition operations;
|
|
|
|
probability of required payment under contingent consideration
provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
In fiscal 2010, we will adopt the business combinations
accounting guidance in FASB ASC 805 [formerly referred to
as SFAS No. 141(Revised), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R)]. Refer to Recently Issued Accounting
Standards below for additional information
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Generally, with the exception of unresolved income tax
matters, subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets
between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the
related amortization is adjusted on a prospective basis.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made
in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based
in part on historical experience and information obtained from
the management of the acquired companies and are inherently
uncertain. Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of
the intangible assets we have acquired or may acquire in the
future include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
future expected cash flows from software license sales, support
agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts and
acquired developed technologies and patents;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to develop in-process research and development
projects into commercially viable products and the estimated
cash flows from the projects when completed;
|
|
|
|
the acquired companys brand and competitive position, as
well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand
will continue to be used in the combined companys product
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
discount rates.
|
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may
affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates
or actual results.
In connection with the purchase price allocations for our
acquisitions, we estimate the fair market value of legal
performance commitments to customers, which are classified as
deferred revenue. The estimated fair market value of these
obligations is determined and recorded as of the acquisition
date.
Other significant estimates associated with the accounting for
business combinations include restructuring costs. Restructuring
costs are typically comprised of severance costs, costs of
consolidating duplicate facilities and contract termination
costs. Restructuring expenses are based upon plans that have
been committed to by management, but are generally subject to
refinement during the purchase price allocation period
(generally within one
42
year of the acquisition date). To estimate restructuring
expenses, management utilizes assumptions of the number of
employees that would be involuntarily terminated and of future
costs to operate and eventually vacate duplicate facilities.
Estimated restructuring expenses may change as management
executes the approved plan.
For a given acquisition, we may identify certain pre-acquisition
contingencies. If, during the purchase price allocation period,
we are able to determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition
contingency, we will include that amount in the purchase price
allocation. If, as of the end of the purchase price allocation
period, we are unable to determine the fair value of a
pre-acquisition contingency, we will evaluate whether to include
an amount in the purchase price allocation based on whether it
is probable a liability had been incurred and whether an amount
can be reasonably estimated. With the exception of unresolved
income tax matters, after the end of the purchase price
allocation period, any adjustment to amounts recorded for a
pre-acquisition contingency will be included in our operating
results in the period in which the adjustment is determined.
Goodwill, Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets and
Impairment Assessments. We have significant
long-lived tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are
susceptible to valuation adjustments as a result of changes in
various factors or conditions. The most significant long-lived
tangible and intangible assets are licensed technology, patents
and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships, fixed assets and tradenames. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits are expected to be utilized. The values of
intangible assets determined in connection with a business
combination, with the exception of goodwill, were initially
determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted cash flow approach. We
assess the potential impairment of intangible and fixed assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying values may not be recoverable. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for potential
impairment at least annually, but also whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values may not be
recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger
an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would materially
impact future results of operations and financial position in
the reporting period identified.
We test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for
impairment on an annual basis as of July 1, and between
annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. The
impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives compares the fair value of identified reporting
unit(s) to its (their) carrying amount to assess whether such
assets are impaired. We have determined that beginning in fiscal
2009, we have three reporting units based on the evolution
during the current fiscal year of the level of information
provided to, and review thereof, by our core market management.
Our three reporting units correspond to our three core market
groups. Prior to fiscal 2009, we concluded that we only had one
reporting unit based on the same criteria. The estimated fair
values of the reporting units for the annual goodwill impairment
test were determined based on estimates of those reporting
units enterprise values as if they were standalone
operations as a function of trailing-twelve-month
(TTM) revenues and adjusted earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) as compared to companies comparable to each
of the reporting units on a standalone basis. The carrying
values of the reporting units were determined based on an
allocation of our assets and liabilities through specific
allocation of certain assets and liabilities, including
goodwill, to the reporting units and an apportionment method
based on relative size of the reporting units revenues and
operating expenses compared to the Company as a whole. Certain
corporate assets that are not instrumental to the reporting
units operations and would not be transferred to
hypothetical purchasers of the reporting units were excluded
from the reporting units carrying values. Key estimates
and judgments inherent to the analysis were the determination of
TTM revenue and EBITDA multiples used in estimating the fair
values of the reporting units and the allocation methods used to
determine the carrying values of the reporting units. Intangible
43
assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are required
to be evaluated periodically to ensure that their current fair
value exceeds the stated book value. Based on our assessments,
we have not had any impairment charges during our history as a
result of our impairment evaluation of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant adverse changes
in our future revenues
and/or
adjusted EBITDA results, or significant degradation in the
enterprise values of comparable companies within our core
markets, could result in the determination that all or a portion
of our goodwill is impaired. However, as of our fiscal 2009
annual impairment assessment date, our estimated fair values of
our reporting units significantly exceeded their carrying values.
We periodically review long-lived assets other than goodwill or
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value for the
asset or asset group. Asset groups utilized in this analysis are
identified as the lowest level grouping of assets for which
largely independent cash flows can be identified. If impairment
is indicated, the asset or asset group is written down to its
estimated fair value.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives of our long-lived assets, determining what
reporting units exist and assessing when events or circumstances
would require an interim impairment analysis of goodwill or
other long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in our
organization or management reporting structure, as well as other
events and circumstances, including but not limited to
technological advances, increased competition and changing
economic or market conditions, could result in (a) shorter
estimated useful lives, (b) additional reporting units,
which may require alternative methods of estimating fair values
or greater disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by
reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments. We
account for share-based awards to employees and directors,
including grants of employee stock options, purchases under
employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of restricted
shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of
units of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units)
through recognition of the fair value of the share-based awards
as a charge against earnings in the form of stock-based
compensation expense. We recognize stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period. The Restricted Stock
and Restricted Units are collectively referred to as
Restricted Awards. Determining the fair value of
share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment,
including estimating expected dividends, share price volatility
and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be
forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of
operations could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. We do not provide for
U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its
foreign subsidiaries, which we consider to be indefinitely
reinvested outside of the U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which we believe do not meet the
more likely than not criteria for recognition. If we
are subsequently able to utilize all or a portion of the
deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been
established, then we may be required to recognize these deferred
tax assets through the reduction of the valuation allowance
which could result in a material benefit to our results of
operations in the period in which the benefit is determined,
excluding the recognition of the portion of the valuation
allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a
business combination or created as a result of share-based
payments or other equity transactions where prevailing guidance
requires the change in valuation allowance
44
to be traced forward. The recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
resulting from share-based payments or other qualifying equity
transactions will be recorded as additional
paid-in-capital;
the recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination will reduce goodwill, intangible assets, and to the
extent remaining, the provision for income taxes, until our
adoption of the business combination accounting guidance in ASC
805 on October 1, 2009; after which time the reductions in
the allowance, if any, will be recorded as a benefit in the
statement of operations.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model,
reserves are established when we have determined that it is more
likely than not that a tax position will or will not be
sustained and at the greatest amount for which the result is
more likely than not.
Loss Contingencies. We are subject to legal
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims relating to labor,
service and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, as discussed in Note 19 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential
financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or
legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated
loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination
of probability and the determination as to whether an exposure
is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to
these matters, accruals are based only on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes
available, we reassess the potential liability related to our
pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such
revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-1,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 08-1).
EITF 08-1,
which has not yet been codified in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification or ASC),
supersedes EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, now
referred to as ASC
605-25-50-1.
EITF 08-1
eliminates the residual method of accounting for non-software
arrangements, as well as the associated requirements for
establishing vendor objective evidence of fair value. The
residual method is replaced in
EITF 08-1
by the estimated selling price method whereby revenue in a
multiple-element arrangement is allocated to each element based
on its estimated selling price. Estimating selling price is
established through a hierarchy starting with vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value, following
by third-party evidence, and lastly by any reasonable, objective
estimate of the selling price were the element to be sold on a
standalone basis. Estimates of selling price must consider both
entity-specific factors and market conditions.
EITF 08-1
is applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered
into, or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted if adopted as of the beginning of an
entitys fiscal year and no prior interim period financial
statements from that fiscal year have already been issued or the
entity retrospectively applies the provisions of this EITF issue
to its previously-issued current fiscal year interim financial
statements. We currently do not expect that the adoption of
EITF 08-1
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2009, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 09-3,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements
(EITF 09-3).
EITF 09-3,
which has not yet been codified in the Codification, applies to
multiple-element arrangements that contain both software and
hardware elements, and amends the scope of AICPA Statement of
Position (SOP)
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
now referred to as ASC
985-605, to
exclude tangible products containing software and non-software
components that together function to deliver the products
essential functionality from the scope of ASC
985-605.
EITF 09-3
is applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered
into, or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted only when
EITF 08-1
is also early adopted as of the same period. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact of
EITF 09-3
on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 168), now referred to as ASC
105-10,
Generally Accepted
45
Accounting Principles. This standard establishes the
Codification as the sole source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by
non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws
remain sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. ASC
105-10 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. We have included
references to the Codification, where appropriate, in our
consolidated financial statements and throughout this annual
report on
Form 10-K.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), now
referred to as ASC
855-10. ASC
855-10
incorporates accounting and disclosure requirements related to
subsequent events into U.S. GAAP. The requirements of ASC
855-10 for
subsequent-events accounting and disclosure are not
significantly different from those in existing auditing
standards, which we have historically followed for financial
reporting purposes. As a result, we do not believe this standard
had any material impact on our financial statements. We have
evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of
these consolidated financial statements, which is
November 23, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, now referred to as ASC
825-10. ASC
825-10
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. ASC
825-10 also
requires those disclosures in summarized financial information
at interim reporting periods. ASC
825-10 was
effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009.
We adopted ASC
825-10 in
our third quarter fiscal 2009, and it had no material impact on
our third quarter financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 141R-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a
Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies
(FSP 141R-1), the guidance from which is
included in ASC 805. This FSP requires that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be
reasonably estimated. This FSP is effective for the fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. As this FSP essentially
reinstates to SFAS No. 141 (Revised), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R), now referred to
as ASC 805, the guidance for accounting for acquired
contingencies from SFAS No. 141, we do not believe
FSP 141R-1 will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, now referred
to as ASC
820-10. ASC
820-10
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets
and liabilities under ASC 820 (formerly known as
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements) in the
current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective
of a fair value measurement remains an exit price. If we were to
conclude that there has been a significant decrease in the
volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in
relation to normal market activities, quoted market
values may not be representative of fair value and we may
conclude that a change in valuation technique or the use of
multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. ASC 820 is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. We adopted this FSP effective April 1,
2009 and such adoption has not had a material impact on our
financial statements, nor do we expect it to in future periods.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, now referred
to as ASC
350-30-25-5.
ASC
350-30-25-5
applies to defensive intangible assets, which are acquired
intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to actively
use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from
obtaining access to them. As these assets are separately
identifiable, they must be recognized at fair value in
accordance with ASC 805 and ASC 820. Defensive intangible assets
recognized are required to be amortized over the estimated
period during which an acquirer expects to receive benefit from
preventing its competitors from obtaining access to the
intangible asset. ASC
350-30-25-5
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The effect of adopting ASC
350-30-25-5
on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition will be largely dependent on the size and nature of
any business combinations and asset acquisitions that we may
complete after September 30, 2009.
In June 2008, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock, now referred to as
ASC
815-40-15.
ASC
815-40-15
provides guidance
46
in assessing whether derivative instruments meet the criteria in
paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, now
referred to as ASC 815, for being considered indexed to an
entitys own common stock. ASC
815-40-15 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We have completed our evaluation of the impact of ASC
815-40-15
and believe the impact will be immaterial based on the nature of
our derivative and hedging activities.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion, now referred to as ASC
470-20. ASC
470-20
requires companies to separately account for the liability
(debt) and equity (conversion option) components of convertible
debt instruments that require or permit settlement in cash upon
conversion in a manner that reflects the issuers
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. ASC
470-20 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and may not be adopted early. ASC
470-20 must
be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We have
completed our evaluation of the adoption of this standard. We
expect the adoption of this standard to result in additional
quarterly non-cash interest expense of between $1.8 million
and $2.2 million from adoption through fiscal 2014.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,
now referred to as ASC
350-30-65-1.
It amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, now referred to as ASC
350. ASC
350-30-65-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and may not be adopted early. We are continuing to evaluate
the potential impact of ASC
350-30-65-1.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, now
referred to as ASC
820-10-15-1A,
which delays the effective date of ASC 820 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for certain items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. ASC
820-10-15-1A
defers our adoption of these remaining provisions of ASC 820 to
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We do not believe the adoption
of the remaining portions of ASC 820 will have a material impact
on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, now referred
to as ASC 805. ASC 805 supersedes the previous accounting
guidance related to business combinations, including the
measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a
business combination, the recognition of and subsequent
accounting for contingent consideration, the recognition of
acquired in-process research and development, the accounting for
acquisition-related restructurings, the treatment of
acquisition-related transaction costs and the recognition of
changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance.
The guidance is applied prospectively from the date of
acquisition with minor exception related to income tax
contingencies from companies acquired prior to the adoption
date. ASC 805 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and may not be adopted early. The effect
of adopting ASC 805 on our consolidated results of operations
and financial condition will be largely dependent on the size
and nature of any business combinations that we may complete
after September 30, 2009; however we expect to write-off
transaction costs of approximately $2.2 million that are
capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related to pending
acquisitions that were not consummated prior to our adoption
date of October 1, 2009.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates, which could affect operating
results, financial position and cash flows. We manage our
exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and
financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of
derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable
47
balances reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change
in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign
currencies will have either a positive or negative effect on our
financial position and results of operations. Historically, our
primary exposure has related to transactions denominated in the
Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee
and Hungarian Forint.
A hypothetical change of 10% in appreciation or depreciation in
foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at September 30, 2009 would not have a
material impact on our revenue, operating results or cash flows.
Periodically, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
against foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts may or
may not be designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. We have no foreign currency contracts designated as
cash flow hedges outstanding at September 30, 2009. The
notional contract amount of outstanding foreign currency
exchange contracts not designated as cash flow hedges was
44.3 million at September 30, 2009. Based on the
nature of the transaction for which the contracts were
purchased, a hypothetical change of 10% in exchange rates would
not have a material impact on our financial results. During
fiscal 2009 and 2008, we recorded foreign exchange gains
(losses) of $7.0 million and ($0.3) million,
respectively.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2009, we held approximately
$527.0 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds. Due to the low
current market yields and the short-term nature of our
investments, a hypothetical change in market rates of one
percentage point would not have a material effect on the fair
value of our portfolio or results of operations.
At September 30, 2009, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $650.3 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, we use
interest rate swaps to convert specific variable-rate debt into
fixed-rate debt. As of September 30, 2009, we have two
outstanding interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
with an aggregate notional amount of $200.0 million. The
interest rates on these swaps are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the
applicable margin for the Credit Facility, and they expire in
October 2010 and November 2010, respectively. As of
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized losses related to these
derivatives were $4.0 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. A hypothetical change in market rates would have a
significant impact on interest expense and amounts payable
relating to the $450.3 million of debt that is not offset
by the interest rate swaps. Assuming a one percentage point
increase in interest rates, our interest expense relative to our
outstanding debt would increase $4.5 million per annum.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Nuance
Communications, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
48
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
49
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Nuance Communications, Inc. as of September 30, 2009 and
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Nuance Communications, Inc. at September 30,
2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Nuance Communications, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO), and our report dated November 25,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 25, 2009
50
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited Nuance Communication Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Nuance Communications, Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Item 9A, Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Nuance Communications, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2009 and our report dated
November 25, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 25, 2009
51
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
373,367
|
|
|
$
|
414,360
|
|
|
$
|
311,847
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
411,363
|
|
|
|
305,540
|
|
|
|
165,520
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
165,622
|
|
|
|
148,562
|
|
|
|
124,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
950,352
|
|
|
|
868,462
|
|
|
|
601,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
37,255
|
|
|
|
45,746
|
|
|
|
43,162
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
254,777
|
|
|
|
214,031
|
|
|
|
114,228
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
29,129
|
|
|
|
31,477
|
|
|
|
27,461
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
38,390
|
|
|
|
24,389
|
|
|
|
13,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
359,551
|
|
|
|
315,643
|
|
|
|
197,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
590,801
|
|
|
|
552,819
|
|
|
|
404,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
119,434
|
|
|
|
114,986
|
|
|
|
80,024
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
219,226
|
|
|
|
231,244
|
|
|
|
184,948
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
112,068
|
|
|
|
105,910
|
|
|
|
75,564
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
76,978
|
|
|
|
58,245
|
|
|
|
24,596
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
7,219
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
533,226
|
|
|
|
520,205
|
|
|
|
365,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
57,575
|
|
|
|
32,614
|
|
|
|
38,977
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(40,103
|
)
|
|
|
(55,196
|
)
|
|
|
(36,501
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
28,189
|
|
|
|
(15,514
|
)
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
40,391
|
|
|
|
14,554
|
|
|
|
22,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
209,801
|
|
|
|
176,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
52
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
|
$
|
261,540
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$6,833 and $6,925
|
|
|
199,548
|
|
|
|
203,542
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
51,545
|
|
|
|
28,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
795,827
|
|
|
|
515,283
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
53,468
|
|
|
|
46,485
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,891,003
|
|
|
|
1,655,773
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
706,805
|
|
|
|
585,023
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,511
|
|
|
|
43,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,499,614
|
|
|
$
|
2,846,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
6,862
|
|
|
$
|
7,006
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
91,431
|
|
|
|
113,074
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
59,574
|
|
|
|
31,517
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
104,819
|
|
|
|
102,099
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
|
|
9,166
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
|
84,607
|
|
|
|
80,521
|
|
Unearned revenue and customer deposits
|
|
|
59,788
|
|
|
|
38,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
419,225
|
|
|
|
381,764
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
888,611
|
|
|
|
894,184
|
|
Long-term portion of accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
24,904
|
|
|
|
32,012
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
33,904
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
56,346
|
|
|
|
46,745
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
48,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,496,176
|
|
|
|
1,421,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 5, and 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 280,647 and 232,592 shares issued and 276,935
and 229,370 shares outstanding
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,254,511
|
|
|
|
1,658,512
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,712 and 3,222 shares)
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
|
|
(16,070
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
12,739
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(247,338
|
)
|
|
|
(235,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,003,438
|
|
|
|
1,424,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,499,614
|
|
|
$
|
2,846,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
53
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
173,182,430
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
773,120
|
|
|
|
3,030,183
|
|
|
$
|
(12,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,656
|
|
|
$
|
(190,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
576,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,383,051
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
30,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958,124
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
159,554
|
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,794,848
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
227,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,091
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,015
|
)
|
|
|
(14,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,628
|
|
|
|
9,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
196,368,445
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
1,078,020
|
|
|
|
3,189,737
|
|
|
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
(204,141
|
)
|
|
|
878,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,513,027
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
28,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315,736
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(911,031
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17,007
|
)
|
|
|
32,582
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity offerings,
net of expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,158,369
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
330,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,382,809
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
132,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765,017
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested options for the purchase of common stock, assumed in
connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions and other post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
232,592,372
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1,658,512
|
|
|
|
3,222,319
|
|
|
|
(16,070
|
)
|
|
|
12,739
|
|
|
|
(235,136
|
)
|
|
|
1,424,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722,505
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,945,149
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(885,944
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10,401
|
)
|
|
|
14,654
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with financing, net of
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,395,626
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
175,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with warrant exercises,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,574,718
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,196,229
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
268,669
|
|
|
|
474,558
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106,657
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested options for the purchase of common stock, assumed in
connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives and investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
280,647,312
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
2,254,511
|
|
|
|
3,711,531
|
|
|
$
|
(16,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
(247,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,003,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
54
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,015
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
18,691
|
|
|
|
16,366
|
|
|
|
12,148
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
115,368
|
|
|
|
82,634
|
|
|
|
37,685
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
48,135
|
|
Gain on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
(8,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
14,068
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,450
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
33,481
|
|
|
|
62,034
|
|
|
|
(14,217
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(12,659
|
)
|
|
|
(2,546
|
)
|
|
|
(4,413
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
26,582
|
|
|
|
(11,946
|
)
|
|
|
10,736
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(5,007
|
)
|
|
|
(14,251
|
)
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue, unearned revenue and customer
deposits
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
9,948
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
258,689
|
|
|
|
196,199
|
|
|
|
106,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(19,512
|
)
|
|
|
(17,716
|
)
|
|
|
(12,656
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(99,120
|
)
|
|
|
(392,527
|
)
|
|
|
(564,295
|
)
|
Payment for equity investment
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(2,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for capitalized patent costs and licensing agreements
|
|
|
(65,875
|
)
|
|
|
(36,479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,501
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
Change in restricted cash balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(184,610
|
)
|
|
|
(446,079
|
)
|
|
|
(577,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(6,999
|
)
|
|
|
(7,771
|
)
|
|
|
(6,768
|
)
|
Deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,650
|
)
|
Proceeds from credit facility and convertible debentures, net of
discount and issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,447
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and common stock
warrants, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
195,571
|
|
|
|
330,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
Payments on other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(9,180
|
)
|
|
|
(11,379
|
)
|
|
|
(11,419
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock
options and purchase plan
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
|
30,199
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(10,402
|
)
|
|
|
(17,002
|
)
|
|
|
(1,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
189,416
|
|
|
|
327,139
|
|
|
|
541,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
265,498
|
|
|
|
77,205
|
|
|
|
72,001
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
261,540
|
|
|
|
184,335
|
|
|
|
112,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
|
$
|
261,540
|
|
|
$
|
184,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
55
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. (we, Nuance,
or the Company) is a leading provider of speech,
imaging and keypad solutions for businesses, organizations and
consumers around the world. Our technologies, applications and
services make the user experience more compelling by
transforming the way people interact with devices and systems,
and how they create, share and use documents. Our solutions are
used every day by millions of people and thousands of businesses
for tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient. We leverage our global
professional services organization and our extensive network of
partners to design and deploy innovative solutions for
businesses and organizations around the globe. We market and
distribute our products through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors, and also sell directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website.
We were incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. In 1999, we
changed our name to ScanSoft, Inc., and changed our ticker
symbol to SSFT. In October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance
Communications, Inc. and changed our ticker symbol to NUAN in
November 2005.
We have built a portfolio of speech solutions through both
internal development and acquisitions, and expect to continue to
pursue opportunities to broaden our solutions and customer base
through acquisitions. Significant business acquisitions during
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2008 SNAPin, Inc.
(SNAPin)
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2008 Philips Speech Recognition
Systems GMBH, a business unit of Royal Philips Electronics
(PSRS);
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2008 eScription, Inc.
(eScription);
|
|
|
|
November 26, 2007 Viecore, Inc.
(Viecore);
|
|
|
|
August 24, 2007 Voice Signal Technologies, Inc.
(VoiceSignal);
|
|
|
|
August 24, 2007 Tegic Communications, Inc.
(Tegic);
|
|
|
|
April 24, 2007 BeVocal, Inc.
(BeVocal); and
|
|
|
|
March 26, 2007 Bluestar Resources Limited, the
parent of Focus Enterprises Limited and Focus India Private
Limited (collectively Focus).
|
The results of operations from the acquired businesses have been
included in our consolidated financial statements from their
respective acquisition dates. See Note 3 for additional
disclosure related to each of these acquisitions.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments. The most
important of these relate to revenue recognition; the allowance
for doubtful accounts and sales returns; accounting for patent
legal defense costs; the costs to develop, and estimates of the
expected useful lives of, custom software applications; the
valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and tangible
56
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
long-lived assets; accounting for business combinations;
accounting for stock-based compensation; accounting for
long-term facility obligations; the valuation of derivative
instruments; accounting for income taxes and related valuation
allowances; and loss contingencies. We base our estimates on
historical experience, market participant fair value
considerations and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual amounts could differ
significantly from these estimates.
Basis
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and
those of our wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries.
Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The
accounts, results of operations and cash flows of acquired
companies are included from their respective acquisition dates.
Reclassification
Certain amounts presented in prior periods consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current periods presentation. Proceeds from employee stock
options and purchase plans and cash used to net-share settle
employee equity awards are now presented as two separate line
items in the consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, whereas
previously they were presented within net proceeds from issuance
of common stock under employee share-based payment plans. The
current portion of our deferred tax asset has been included in
the prepaid expenses and other current assets line item whereas
previously it was presented as a separate line item.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive revenue from the following sources: (1) software
license agreements, including royalty and other usage-based
arrangements, (2) post-contract customer support,
(3) fixed and variable fee hosting arrangements and
(4) professional services. Our revenue recognition policies
for these revenue streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has the contractual right to
take possession of the software or technology at its sole
discretion and without undue economic cost or burden. In select
situations, we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with, or in place of, embedding our intellectual
property in software. We recognize revenue from the sale or
license of software products and licensing of technology when
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
(ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is probable.
Vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair
value for software and software-related services exists when a
company can support what the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged when the same elements are sold separately. VSOE of fair
value is required, generally, in order to separate the
accounting for various elements in a software and related
services arrangement. We, in general, have established VSOE of
fair value of post-contract customer support (PCS),
professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to three years. Revenue from PCS is
generally recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the
term that the maintenance service is provided.
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
57
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For revenue arrangements with multiple elements that are not
considered to be software or software-related, we allocate an
arrangements fees into separate units of accounting based
on fair value. We generally support fair value of our
deliverables based upon the prices we charge when we sell
similar elements separately.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, or
the expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by classifying the fair value of professional service revenue as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot estimate historical returns from these distributors and
resellers to have a basis upon which to estimate future sales
returns. As a result, we recognize revenue from sales to these
distributors and resellers when the products are sold through to
retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to end-users, we make an
estimate of sales returns based on historical experience. The
provision for these estimated returns is recorded as a reduction
of revenue and accounts receivable at the time that the related
revenue is recorded. If actual returns differ significantly from
our estimates, such differences could have a material impact on
our results of operations for the period in which the actual
returns become known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
58
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Business
Combinations
We determine and allocate the purchase price of an acquired
company to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as well as to in-process research and
development as of the business combination date. Results of
operations and cash flows of acquired companies are included
from the date of acquisition. The purchase price allocation
process requires us to use significant estimates and
assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business
combination date including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to complete any in-process research and
development projects;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
estimated value of restructuring liabilities to reorganize the
acquirees pre-acquisition operations;
|
|
|
|
probability of required payment under contingent consideration
provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Generally, with the exception of unresolved income tax
matters, subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets
between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the
related amortization is adjusted on a prospective basis.
In fiscal 2010, we will adopt the business combinations
accounting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 805 [formerly referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141(Revised), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R)]. Refer to Recently Issued
Accounting Standards below for additional information.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a
business combination over the fair value of net tangible and
intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are not amortized, but rather are required to
be evaluated at least annually to ensure that their current fair
value exceeds their carrying value.
The carrying amounts of these assets are reviewed for impairment
at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be
recoverable. Our annual impairment assessment date is July 1 of
each fiscal year. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment based on
comparison of the fair value of our reporting units to their
recorded carrying values. We have determined that beginning in
fiscal 2009, we have three reporting units based on the level of
information provided to, and review thereof, by our core market
management. The three determined reporting units are our three
core market groups. Prior to fiscal 2009, we concluded that we
were comprised of only one reporting unit. The fair values of
the reporting units for the annual impairment assessment were
determined based on estimates of those reporting units
enterprise values as a function
59
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of trailing-twelve-month (TTM) revenues and EBITDA
as compared to companies comparable to each of the reporting
units on a standalone basis. The carrying values of the
reporting units were determined based on an allocation of the
Companys assets and liabilities through specific
allocation of certain assets and liabilities to the reporting
units and an apportionment method based on relative size of the
reporting units revenues and operating expenses compared
to the Company as a whole. Certain corporate assets that are not
instrumental to the reporting units operations and would
not be transferred to hypothetical purchasers of the reporting
units were excluded from the reporting units carrying
values. Indefinite-lived intangibles are evaluated for
impairment through comparison of the fair value of the assets to
their net book value. No impairments of goodwill or
indefinite-lived intangibles have been recorded in fiscal 2009,
2008 or 2007.
Long-Lived
Assets
Our long-lived assets consist principally of acquired intangible
assets and land, buildings and equipment. Land, buildings and
equipment are stated at cost. Buildings and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the related
lease term or the estimated useful life. Costs of computer
software developed or obtained for internal use are depreciated
over the estimated useful life of the software. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method. Costs of significant
improvements on existing software are capitalized and amortized
over the remaining useful life of the related software. Repair
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The cost and
related accumulated depreciation of sold or retired assets are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in
operations.
We include in our amortizable intangible assets those intangible
assets acquired in our business and asset acquisitions,
including certain technology that is licensed from third
parties. We amortize acquired intangible assets with finite
lives over the estimated economic lives of the assets, generally
using the straight-line method except where the pattern of the
expected economic benefit is readily identifiable, primarily
customer relationship intangibles, whereby amortization follows
that pattern. Each period, we evaluate the estimated remaining
useful life of acquired and licensed intangible assets, as well
as land, buildings and equipment, to determine whether events or
changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining
period of depreciation or amortization.
We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset
or asset group may not be recoverable. We assess the
recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future
cash flows the assets are expected to generate and recognize an
impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the assets plus net proceeds
expected from disposition of the assets, if any, are less than
the carrying value of the assets. If an asset or asset group is
deemed to be impaired, the amount of the impairment loss, if
any, represents the excess of the asset or asset groups
carrying value compared to its estimated fair value.
We conducted a long-lived asset impairment analysis at the
beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and concluded
that our long-lived assets were not impaired. In fiscal 2008, we
recorded impairment charges of $3.9 million resulting from
the identification of certain specific acquired intangible
assets that were no longer being utilized or providing economic
benefit, of which $0.3 million was included in cost of
revenue from amortization of intangible assets, and
$3.6 million was included in amortization of intangible
assets within operating expenses. There were no impairment
charges for long-lived assets recorded in fiscal 2007.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash on hand, including
money market funds and commercial paper with original maturities
of 90 days or less.
60
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Marketable
Securities and Minority Investments
Marketable Securities: Investments are
classified as
available-for-sale
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with
unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Minority Investment: We record investments in
other companies where we do not have a controlling interest or
significant influence in the equity investment at cost within
other assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
We review all of our investments for impairment whenever
estimated declines in fair value are deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
reducing the carrying value of such investments to their
estimated fair value at that time.
Allowances
against Accounts Receivable
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: We maintain
an allowance for doubtful accounts for the estimated probable
losses on uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is
based upon the credit worthiness of our customers, our
historical experience, the age of the receivable and current
market and economic conditions. Receivables are written off
against these allowances in the period they are determined to be
uncollectible.
Allowance for Sales Returns: We maintain an
allowance for sales returns from customers for which we have the
ability to estimate returns based on historical experience. The
returns allowance is recorded as a reduction in revenue and
accounts receivable at the time the related revenue is recorded.
Receivables are written off against the allowance in the period
the return is received.
For the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the
allowances against accounts receivables were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
Sales Returns
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
4,106
|
|
|
$
|
6,304
|
|
Bad debt expenses
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
Bad debt expenses
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(3,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
Bad debt expenses
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,833
|
|
|
$
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, computed using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market. We regularly review inventory
quantities on hand and record a provision for excess
and/or
obsolete inventory primarily based on future purchase
commitments with our suppliers, and the estimated utility of our
inventory as well as other factors including technological
changes and new product development.
61
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research
and Development Costs
Internal costs relating to research and development costs
incurred for new software products and enhancements to existing
products, other than certain software development costs that
qualify for capitalization, are expensed as incurred.
Software
Development Costs
Software development costs related to software that is or will
be sold or licensed externally to third-parties, or for which a
substantive plan exists to sell or license such software in the
future, incurred subsequent to the establishment of
technological feasibility, but prior to the general release of
the product, are capitalized and amortized to cost of revenue
over the estimated useful life of the related products. We have
determined that technological feasibility is reached shortly
before the general release of our software products. Costs
incurred after technological feasibility is established have not
been material, and accordingly, we have expensed the internal
costs relating to research and development when incurred.
Capitalized
Patent Defense Costs
We monitor the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if we
determine that the success of the defense of a patent is
probable, and so long as we believe that the future economic
benefit of the patent will be increased, we capitalize external
legal costs incurred in the defense of these patents, up to the
level of the expected increased future economic benefit. If
changes in the anticipated outcome occur, we write-off any
capitalized costs in the period the change is determined. Upon
successful defense of the patent, the amounts previously
capitalized are amortized over the remaining life of the patent.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized patent
defense costs recorded in other assets totaled $6.8 million
and $6.7 million, respectively.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as
sales and marketing expenses. Cooperative advertising programs
reimburse customers for marketing activities for certain of our
products, subject to defined criteria. Cooperative advertising
obligations are accrued and the costs expensed at the same time
the related revenue is recognized. Cooperative advertising
expenses are recorded as expense to the extent that an
advertising benefit separate from the revenue transaction can be
identified and the cash paid does not exceed the fair value of
that advertising benefit received. Any excess of cash paid over
the fair value of the advertising benefit received is recorded
as a reduction in revenue. We incurred advertising costs of
$15.8 million, $20.9 million and $19.2 million
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We do
not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed
earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, which we consider to be
indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which we believe do not meet the
more likely than not criteria for recognition. If we
are subsequently able to utilize all or a portion of the
deferred
62
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been established,
then we may be required to recognize these deferred tax assets
through the reduction of the valuation allowance which could
result in a material benefit to its results of operations in the
period in which the benefit is determined, excluding the
recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination or created as a result of share-based payments or
other equity transactions where prevailing guidance requires the
change in valuation allowance to be traced forward through
stockholders equity. The recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
resulting from share-based payments or other qualifying equity
transactions will be recorded as additional
paid-in-capital;
the recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination will reduce goodwill, intangible assets, and to the
extent remaining, the provision for income taxes, until our
adoption of the business combination accounting guidance in ASC
805 on October 1, 2009; after which time the reductions in
the allowance, if any, will be recorded as a benefit in the
statement of operations.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model,
reserves are established when we have determined that it is more
likely than not that a tax position will or will not be
sustained and at the greatest amount for which the result is
more likely than not.
Comprehensive
Loss
Total comprehensive loss, net of taxes, was approximately
$17.4 million, $32.3 million and $4.7 million for
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Comprehensive loss
consists of net loss, current period foreign currency
translation adjustments, unrealized losses on cash flow hedge
derivatives, and unrealized gains (losses) on pensions. For the
purposes of comprehensive loss disclosures, we do not record tax
provisions or benefits for the net changes in the foreign
currency translation adjustment, as we intend to reinvest
undistributed earnings in our foreign subsidiaries permanently.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income,
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Loss, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
15,874
|
|
|
$
|
15,145
|
|
|
$
|
11,854
|
|
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on pensions
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
12,739
|
|
|
$
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration
of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash
equivalents, and trade accounts receivable. We place our cash
and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high
credit ratings. As part of our cash and investment management
processes, we perform periodic evaluations of the credit
standing of the financial institutions with whom we maintain
deposits, and have not recorded any credit losses to-date. For
trade accounts receivable, we perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers financial condition and limit the amount
of credit extended when deemed appropriate. At
September 30, 2009 and 2008, no customer accounted for
greater than 10% of our net accounts receivable balance. No
customer composed more than 10% of revenue for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007.
63
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments including cash equivalents, marketable
securities, investments, accounts receivable, and derivative
instruments, are carried in the financial statements at amounts
that approximate their fair value based on the short maturities
of those instruments. Refer to Note 11 for discussion of
the fair value of our long-term debt.
Foreign
Currency Translation
We have significant foreign operations and transact business in
various foreign currencies. In general, the functional currency
of a foreign operation is the local countrys currency.
Non-functional currency monetary balances are re-measured into
the functional currency of the subsidiary with any related gain
or loss recorded in other income (expense), net, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Assets and
liabilities of operations outside the United States, for which
the functional currency is the local currency, are translated
into United States dollars using period-end exchange rates.
Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates in effect during each fiscal month during the year. The
effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency
transaction gains (losses) included in net loss for fiscal 2009,
2008, and 2007 were $7.0 million, $(0.3) million, and
$0.8 million, respectively.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We utilize derivative instruments in our business combination
and asset acquisition arrangements, as well as to hedge specific
financial risks such as interest rate and foreign exchange risk.
We do not engage in speculative hedging activity. In order for
us to account for a derivative instrument as a hedge, specific
criteria must be met, including: (i) ensuring at the
inception of the hedge that formal documentation exists for both
the hedging relationship and the entitys risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge and
(ii) at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis,
the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in fair value attributed to the
hedged risk during the period that the hedge is designated.
Further, an assessment of effectiveness is required whenever
financial statements or earnings are reported. Absent meeting
these criteria, changes in fair value are recognized in other
income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of
operations. Once the underlying forecasted transaction is
realized, the gain or loss from the derivative designated as a
hedge of the transaction is reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to the statement of operations, in
the appropriate revenue or expense caption. Any ineffective
portion of the derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is
recognized in current earnings.
Accounting
for Share-Based Payments
We account for share-based payments to employees and directors,
including grants of employee stock options, purchases under
employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of restricted
shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of
units of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units)
through recognition of the fair value of the share-based
payments as a charge against earnings. We recognize stock-based
compensation expense over the requisite service period. The
Restricted Stock and Restricted Units are collectively referred
to as Restricted Awards.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with the
Two-Class Method. Under the two-class method, basic net
income per share is computed by dividing the net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Net losses are
not allocated to preferred stockholders. We have determined that
our outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock
represents a participating security and as such shares thereof
are excluded from basic earnings per share.
64
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Diluted net income per share is computed using the more dilutive
of (a) the two-class method, or (b) the if-converted
method. We allocate net income first to preferred stockholders
based on dividend rights and then to common and preferred
stockholders based on ownership interests. The weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common equivalent shares, including
outstanding stock options and restricted stock, shares held in
escrow, contingently issuable shares under earn-out agreements
once earned, warrants, and potential issuance of stock upon
conversion of convertible debentures. On August 13, 2007,
we issued $250.0 million of 2.75% convertible debentures
which are considered Instrument C securities due to the fact
that only the excess of the conversion value on date of
conversion can be paid in our common shares; the principal
portion of the conversion must be paid in cash. Therefore, only
the shares of common stock potentially issuable with respect to
the excess of the conversion value over its principal amount, if
any, is considered as dilutive potential common shares for
purposes of calculating diluted net income per share. The
conversion value for the convertible debentures was less than
the principal amount since its issuance date and no shares were
assumed to be issued for purposes of computing the diluted net
loss per share.
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares
aggregating to 31.6 million shares, 33.1 million
shares and 26.3 million shares for the years ended
September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, have been
excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share
because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-1,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 08-1).
EITF 08-1,
which has not yet been codified in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification or ASC),
supersedes EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, now
referred to as ASC
605-25-50-1.
EITF 08-1
eliminates the residual method of accounting for non-software
arrangements, as well as the associated requirements for
establishing vendor objective evidence of fair value. The
residual method is replaced in
EITF 08-1
by the estimated selling price method whereby revenue in a
multiple-element arrangement is allocated to each element based
on its estimated selling price. Estimating selling price is
established through a hierarchy starting with vendor-specific
objective evidence of fair value, following by third-party
evidence, and lastly by any reasonable, objective estimate of
the selling price were the element to be sold on a standalone
basis. Estimates of selling price must consider both
entity-specific factors and market conditions.
EITF 08-1
is applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered
into, or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted if adopted as of the beginning of an
entitys fiscal year and no prior interim period financial
statements from that fiscal year have already been issued or the
entity retrospectively applies the provisions of this EITF issue
to its previously-issued current fiscal year interim financial
statements. We currently do not expect that the adoption of
EITF 08-1
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2009, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 09-3,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements
(EITF 09-3).
EITF 09-3,
which has not yet been codified in the Codification, applies to
multiple-element arrangements that contain both software and
hardware elements, and amends the scope of AICPA Statement of
Position (SOP)
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, now referred to as ASC
985-605, to
exclude tangible products containing software and non-software
components that together function to deliver the products
essential functionality from the scope of ASC
985-605.
EITF 09-3
is applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered
into, or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted only when
EITF 08-1
is also early adopted as of the same period. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact of this EITF issue on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 168), now referred to as ASC
105-10,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard
establishes the Codification as the sole source of authoritative
65
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by
non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws
remain sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. ASC
105-10 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. We have included
references to the Codification, where appropriate, in our
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), now
referred to as ASC
855-10. ASC
855-10
incorporates accounting and disclosure requirements related to
subsequent events into U.S. GAAP. The requirements of ASC
855-10 for
subsequent-events accounting and disclosure are not
significantly different from those in existing auditing
standards, which we have historically followed for financial
reporting purposes. As a result, we do not believe this standard
had any material impact on our financial statements. We have
evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of
these consolidated financial statements, which is
November 25, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, now referred to as ASC
825-10. ASC
825-10
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. ASC
825-10 also
requires those disclosures in summarized financial information
at interim reporting periods. ASC
825-10 was
effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009.
We adopted ASC
825-10 in
our third quarter fiscal 2009, and it had no material impact on
our third quarter financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 141R-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a
Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies
(FSP 141R-1), the guidance from which is
included in ASC 805. This FSP requires that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies be recognized at fair value, if fair value can be
reasonably estimated. This FSP is effective for the fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. As this FSP essentially
reinstates to SFAS No. 141 (Revised), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R), now referred to
as ASC 805, the guidance for accounting for acquired
contingencies from SFAS No. 141, we do not believe
FSP 141R-1 will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, now referred
to as ASC
820-10. ASC
820-10
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets
and liabilities under ASC 820 (formerly known as
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements) in the
current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective
of a fair value measurement remains an exit price. If we were to
conclude that there has been a significant decrease in the
volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in
relation to normal market activities, quoted market
values may not be representative of fair value and we may
conclude that a change in valuation technique or the use of
multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. ASC 820 is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. We adopted ASC
820-10
effective April 1, 2009 and such adoption has not had a
material impact on our financial statements, nor do we expect it
to in future periods.
In November 2008, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, now referred
to as ASC
350-30-25-5.
ASC
350-30-25-5
applies to defensive intangible assets, which are acquired
intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to actively
use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from
obtaining access to them. As these assets are separately
identifiable, they must be recognized at fair value in
accordance with ASC 805 and ASC 820. Defensive intangible assets
recognized are required to be amortized over the estimated
period during which an acquirer expects to receive benefit from
preventing its competitors from obtaining access to the
intangible asset. ASC
350-30-25-5
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The effect of adopting ASC
350-30-25-5
on our consolidated results of operations and
66
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial condition will be largely dependent on the size and
nature of any business combinations and asset acquisitions that
we may complete after September 30, 2009.
In June 2008, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock, now referred to as
ASC
815-40-15.
ASC
815-40-15
provides guidance in assessing whether derivative instruments
meet the criteria in paragraph 11(a) of
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, now referred to as ASC 815, for
being considered indexed to an entitys own common stock.
ASC
815-40-15 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We have completed our evaluation of the impact of ASC
815-40-15
and believe the impact will be immaterial based on the nature of
our derivative and hedging activities.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion, now referred to as ASC
470-20. ASC
470-20
requires companies to separately account for the liability
(debt) and equity (conversion option) components of convertible
debt instruments that require or permit settlement in cash upon
conversion in a manner that reflects the issuers
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. ASC
470-20 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and may not be adopted early. ASC
470-20 must
be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We have
completed our evaluation of the adoption of this standard. We
expect the adoption of this standard to result in additional
quarterly non-cash interest expense of between $1.8 million
and $2.2 million from adoption through fiscal 2014.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,
now referred to as FASB ASC
350-30-65-1.
It amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,
now referred to as ASC 350. ASC
350-30-65-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and may not be adopted early. We are continuing to evaluate
the potential impact of ASC
350-30-65-1.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, now
referred to as ASC
820-10-15-1A,
which delays the effective date of ASC 820 for non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities, except for certain items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. ASC
820-10-15-1A
defers our adoption of these remaining provisions of ASC 820 to
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We do not believe the adoption
of the remaining portions of ASC 820 will have a material impact
on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, now referred
to as ASC 805. ASC 805 supersedes the previous accounting
guidance related to business combinations, including the
measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a
business combination, the recognition of and subsequent
accounting for contingent consideration, the recognition of
acquired in-process research and development, the accounting for
acquisition-related restructurings, the treatment of
acquisition-related transaction costs and the recognition of
changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance.
The guidance is applied prospectively from the date of
acquisition with minor exception related to income tax
contingencies from companies acquired prior to the adoption
date. ASC 805 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and may not be adopted early. The effect
of adopting ASC 805 on our consolidated results of operations
and financial condition will be largely dependent on the size
and nature of any business combinations that we may complete
after September 30, 2009; however we expect to write-off
transaction costs of approximately $2.2 million that are
capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related to pending
acquisitions that were not consummated prior to our adoption
date of October 1, 2009.
67
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2009
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of SNAPin
On October 1, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SNAPin, a developer of self-service software
for mobile devices, to expand our Mobile-Enterprise offerings.
The acquisition was a taxable event.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin, we agreed to make
a contingent earn-out payment of up to $45.0 million in
cash to be paid, if at all, based on the business achieving
certain performance targets that are measurable from the
acquisition date to December 31, 2009. Additionally, we
would be required to issue earn-out consideration to SNAPin
option holders. This option earn-out consideration, if earned,
is payable at our sole discretion, in cash, stock or additional
options to purchase common stock. The total value of this option
earn-out consideration may aggregate up to $2.5 million
which will be recorded as compensation expense over the service
period, if earned. These earn-out payments, if any, would be
payable upon the final measurement of the performance targets.
As of September 30, 2009, we have recorded approximately
$12.9 million related to the contingent earn-out provisions
as additional purchase price.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of SNAPin is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock(a)
|
|
$
|
166,253
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units assumed
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
Contingent earn-out consideration
|
|
|
12,941
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
193,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
Deferred tax asset(c)
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
60,900
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
153,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
225,582
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability(c)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
Deferred revenue(b)
|
|
|
(27,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(32,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
193,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 9.5 million shares of our common stock valued
at $15.81 per share were issued at closing and 1.1 million
shares valued at $14.11 per share were issued upon release of
shares held in escrow. |
|
(b) |
|
We assumed significant legal performance obligations related to
acquired customer contracts. We estimate the fair market value
of the obligations based on expected costs we will incur to
fulfill the obligation plus a normal profit margin. The fair
value of the legal performance obligations remaining to be
delivered on these customer contracts was approximately
$53.4 million and the remaining cash to be collected on
these contracts was approximately $25.9 million at the date
of acquisition. |
68
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
We recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of purchase
accounting associated with SNAPin. This results in an increase
of the net deferred tax asset and a reduction of the
corresponding valuation allowance in the consolidated group.
Therefore, there is no impact on goodwill related to the
deferred tax liability. |
We assumed vested and unvested stock options that were converted
into options to purchase 1,258,708 shares of our common
stock and restricted stock units that were converted into
299,446 shares of our common stock. The fair value of the
assumed vested stock options and restricted stock units as of
the date of acquisition are included in the purchase price
above. The fair value of the assumed vested stock options was
calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with
the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of
0.0%; expected volatility of 55.5%; average risk-free interest
rate of 2.8%; and an expected term of 4.8 years. Assumed
unvested stock options and restricted stock units as of the date
of acquisition will be recorded as stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period as disclosed in
Note 18.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives (table in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
21,200
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
and Fourth Quarter Acquisitions
During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009, we acquired
several businesses primarily to expand our product offerings
within our core markets. The pro forma effect of these
acquisitions on our previously reported financial results is
immaterial and is not included in our pro forma financial
results as disclosed in Note 4. The results of operations
of these acquisitions are included in our fiscal 2009 financial
statements since their respective acquisition dates. In the
aggregate, the purchase price for these acquisitions was
approximately $121.2 million, net of cash assumed of
$36.8 million. The gross purchase price consisted of the
issuance of 6.4 million shares of our common stock valued
at $80.8 million, $68.0 million in cash and
$9.2 million for transaction costs. $8.9 million in
cash in aggregate has been placed in escrow related to two of
the acquisitions and has been excluded from the total purchase
consideration until the escrow contingencies have been
satisfied. In allocating the total purchase consideration for
these acquisitions based on estimated fair values, we have
preliminarily recorded $47.2 million of goodwill,
$85.0 million of identifiable intangible assets, and
$25.8 million in net assets (resulting primarily from cash
assumed; acquired unbilled receivables, net of liabilities
assumed including contingencies; deferred income taxes; and
restructuring). We have assumed a $5.0 million tax
contingency established for uncertain foreign tax positions
relating to one of the acquisitions. The preliminary allocations
of the purchase consideration were based upon preliminary or
final valuations and our estimates and assumptions remain
subject to change. Intangible assets acquired included primarily
core and completed technology and customer relationships with
weighted average useful lives of 9.6 years.
2008
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of PSRS
On September 26, 2008, we acquired PSRS, a business unit of
Royal Philips Electronics, a provider of speech recognition
solutions, primarily in the European healthcare market, for
total consideration of $101.8 million, consisting of: net
cash consideration of 66.0 million, which equated to
$96.6 million based on the exchange rate as
69
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the acquisition date, and transaction costs of
$4.2 million. The acquisition was a taxable event.
$34.4 million was paid at the acquisition date and the
remaining deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million ($64.6 million based on the
exchange rate as of September 30, 2009) was due per
the asset purchase agreement on September 21, 2009. We paid
the deferred acquisition payment on October 22, 2009. The
purchase price was finalized in November 2009 based on a final
working capital adjustment agreed between us and the former
shareholder of PSRS, reducing the final purchase price by
1.4 million ($2.1 million based on the exchange
rate as of September 30, 2009), reflective of the amount
agreed to be paid to us by the former shareholder of PSRS.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of PSRS is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
99,006
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
103,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,374
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,223
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
54,099
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
55,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
127,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(5,757
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(18,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(24,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
103,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets include refundable research and development
credits, refundable value added tax payments, prepaid expenses
and inventory. Other liabilities assumed primarily relate to
deferred tax liabilities, statutory benefits due to PSRS
employees and deferred revenue. The in-process research and
development of $2.6 million was expensed at the time of
acquisition as the related projects had not yet reached
technological feasibility and it was deemed that the research
and development in-progress had no alternative future uses.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
45,197
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
7,924
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of Multi-Vision
On July 31, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Multi-Vision, a provider of technology for
proactive notification which can be implemented as a hosted
application or on a customers premises, for total purchase
consideration of approximately $10.5 million, which
included 0.5 million shares of our common stock valued at
$15.59 per share. The acquisition was a taxable event.
We may also be required to issue up to an additional
$15.0 million, payable in stock, or cash, solely at our
discretion, relating to earn-out provisions as described in the
share purchase agreement. Two-thirds of the earn-out is
conditioned on performance targets and continued employment;
accordingly, up to $10.0 million of any earn-out payments
that become payable will be recorded to compensation expense,
and up to $5.0 million, the portion of the prospective
earn-out attributable solely to performance targets, will be
recorded as additional purchase price and allocated to goodwill.
As of September 30, 2009, we have not recorded any
obligation or related compensation expense relative to these
measures.
The purchase price allocation for the acquisition of
Multi-Vision is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
331
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
2,330
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
9,630
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,886
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities include deferred tax liabilities and deferred
revenue.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of eScription
On May 20, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of eScription, a provider of hosted and premises-based
computer-aided medical transcription solutions, for total
purchase consideration of $412.1 million, which included
0.2 million shares of our common stock valued at $17.98 per
share issued at closing and 0.7 million shares valued at
$12.34 per share and 0.3 million shares valued at $13.77
issued in fiscal 2009 upon release of shares held in escrow.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we elected to treat
this acquisition as an asset purchase under provisions contained
in the Internal Revenue Code. See Note 21 for further
discussion of this election.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of eScription is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
354,071
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
16,162
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units assumed
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
9,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
412,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,520
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
157,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
237,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
418,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(4,730
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(6,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
412,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets include prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Other liabilities assumed primarily relate to deferred tax
liabilities, deferred revenue and amounts accrued relating to
excess facilities accrued as a component of accrued business
combination costs.
We assumed vested and unvested stock options for the purchase of
2,846,118 shares of Nuance common stock, and restricted
stock units that may convert to 806,044 shares of Nuance
common stock, in connection with our acquisition of eScription.
These stock options and restricted stock units are governed by
the original agreements under which they were issued under the
eScription Stock Option Plan, but are now exercisable for, or
will vest into, shares of Nuance common stock. Assumed vested
stock options and restricted stock units as of the date of
acquisition are included in the purchase price above. The fair
value of the assumed vested stock options is calculated under
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following
weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of 0.0%, expected
volatility of 50.8%, average risk-free interest rate of 2.3% and
an expected term of 1.9 years. Assumed unvested stock
options and restricted stock units as of the date of acquisition
will be recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the
requisite service period as disclosed in Note 18.
72
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
130,300
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Viecore
On November 26, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Viecore, a consulting and systems integration
firm, for total purchase consideration of approximately
$112.4 million, which included 4.4 million shares of
our common stock valued at $21.01 per share issued at closing
and 0.6 million shares valued at $9.05 per share issued in
fiscal 2009 upon release of shares held in escrow. The
acquisition was a non-taxable event.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Viecore is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
98,405
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
112,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
5,491
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
13,848
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
22,770
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
79,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
143,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(7,438
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(23,741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(31,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
112,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
22,390
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Vocada
On November 2, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Vocada, a provider of software and services for
managing critical medical test results for total purchase
consideration of approximately $22.4 million, which
included 0.8 million shares of our common stock valued at
$20.47 per share issued at closing and 0.1 million shares
valued at $10.36 per share issued in fiscal 2009 upon release of
shares held in escrow. The acquisition was a non-taxable event.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. Payments, if any, may be made in the
form of cash or shares of our common stock, at our sole
discretion. We have notified the former shareholders of Vocada
that the financial targets for certain periods were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Vocada have requested
additional information regarding this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of Vocada
regarding this matter. As of September 30, 2009, we have
not recorded any obligation relative to these measures.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Vocada is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
18,320
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
2,964
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
429
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
15,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
24,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(2,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of Commissure
On September 28, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Commissure, a medical imaging software company
that provides speech-enabled radiology workflow optimization and
data analysis solutions for total purchase consideration of
approximately $27.2 million, which included
1.2 million shares of our common stock valued at $19.49 per
share issued at closing and 0.2 million shares valued at
$9.63 per share issued in fiscal 2009 upon release of shares
held in escrow. The acquisition was a non-taxable event.
The merger agreement includes a contingent earn-out payment of
up to $8.0 million upon the achievement of certain
financial targets for fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Payments, if any, may be made in the form of cash or shares of
our common stock, solely at our discretion. We have notified the
former shareholders of Commissure that the financial targets for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, were not achieved
and the related contingent earn-out payment was not earned.
Through September 30, 2009, we have not recorded any
obligation relative to the Commissure transaction earn-out
provisions.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Commissure is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
24,974
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
27,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
3,493
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
30,453
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(3,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
27,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets acquired primarily relate to cash, accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses, and acquired unbilled accounts
receivable. Liabilities assumed primarily relate to accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and deferred revenue.
75
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of VoiceSignal
On August 24, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of VoiceSignal, a software company that provides
speech technology for cell phones and other mobile devices for
total purchase consideration of approximately
$319.3 million, which included 5.8 million shares of
our common stock valued at $15.57 per share issued at closing.
The acquisition was a taxable event.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of VoiceSignal is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
204,490
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
90,851
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
23,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
319,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
10,874
|
|
Accounts receivable, including acquired unbilled accounts
receivable
|
|
|
15,493
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
71,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
228,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
330,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(5,873
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(10,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
319,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities include deferred tax liabilities and deferred
revenue.
76
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
60,700
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Tegic
On August 24, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Tegic, a developer of embedded software for
mobile devices for total purchase consideration of
$268.3 million. The acquisition was a taxable event.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Tegic is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
3,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
268,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, including acquired unbilled accounts
receivable
|
|
$
|
58,607
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
548
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
52,490
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
164,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
276,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(3,919
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(4,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(8,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
268,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities include deferred tax liabilities and deferred
revenue.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
34,490
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
16,400
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
52,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of BeVocal
On April 24, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of BeVocal, a provider of on-demand self-service
customer care solutions that address the unique business
requirements of the mobile communications market and its
customers for total purchase consideration of
$187.8 million, which included 7.0 million shares of
our common stock valued at $14.96 per share issued at closing.
In connection with this acquisition, 1.2 million shares of
our common stock were placed into escrow to satisfy any
indemnification claims. In August 2009, 0.8 million of the
escrow shares, worth $9.2 million, were released to the
former BeVocal shareholders in settlement of all outstanding
claims between the former BeVocal shareholders and us and
accounted for as an increase to the BeVocal purchase price. The
acquisition was a non-taxable event.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $65.1 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets through
December 31, 2007. A portion of the total amount of the
earn-out payments was further conditioned on continued
employment provisions. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008, we paid to the former shareholders of
BeVocal, Inc. $46.1 million to satisfy our contingent
earn-out obligations, of which $40.2 million was paid in
cash, $5.9 million was paid in stock at that time, and an
additional $3.0 million is being disbursed to BeVocal
option holders through April 2011. $40.0 million of the
total earn-out payment has been recorded as an increase to
purchase price and the remaining $9.1 million has been
recorded to compensation expense from the date of acquisition
through September 30, 2009.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of BeVocal is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
113,649
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Contingent earn-out consideration
|
|
|
40,025
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
187,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
9,266
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
11,018
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,152
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
41,200
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
148,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
215,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(24,215
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(3,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(27,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
187,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
34,700
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Focus
On March 26, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Focus, which provides medical transcription
services with operations in the United States and India for
total purchase consideration of $58.7 million. The
acquisition was a taxable event.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Focus is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
54,477
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
58,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
23,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
31,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
62,051
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(3,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
58,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
19,800
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of MVC
On December 29, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Mobile Voice Control, Inc. (MVC), a
provider of speech-enabled mobile search and messaging services,
for total purchase consideration of $20.7, which included
0.8 million shares of our common stock valued at
$8.3 million. The acquisition was a non-taxable event
Under the agreement, we agreed to make additional earn-out
payments of up to 1,700,839 shares of our common stock upon
achievement of established targets. 566,946 of these shares were
apportioned to calendar 2007 targets, and 1,133,893 shares
to calendar 2008 targets. During fiscal 2008, we amended the
earn-out provisions set forth in the merger agreement such that
the former shareholders of MVC were eligible to earn the
remaining calendar 2007 earn-out amount, consisting of
188,962 shares, if certain conditions were met at
December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, we
determined that the full 188,962 shares had been earned.
The total value of the shares was $3.0 million, of which
$1.0 million was recorded to goodwill as incremental
purchase price during fiscal 2008, and the remaining
$2.0 million was amortized as compensation expense from May
2008 to December 2008. In November 2008, a second amendment to
the merger agreement was signed pursuant to which the earn-out
period for the calendar 2008 earn-out was extended, such that
377,964 and 755,929 shares could now be earned based on the
achievement of calendar 2008 and 2009 targets, respectively. The
stock payments, if any, that are made based on the provisions of
this second amendment will be recorded to goodwill, as
incremental purchase price. We notified the former shareholders
of MVC that the financial targets for calendar 2008 were not
achieved and the 377,964 shares were not earned. As of
September 30, 2009, we have not recorded any obligation
relative to the second amendment.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of MVC, including the impact of certain components of the
earn-out, as amended, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
Contingent earn-out consideration
|
|
|
7,983
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
20,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
20,915
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
20,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Pro Forma
Results (Unaudited)
|
The following table shows unaudited pro forma results of
operations as if we had acquired SNAPin and our other material
acquisitions from fiscal 2008 (PSRS, eScription, Inc., and
Viecore, Inc.) on October 1, 2007 (table in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
$
|
946,028
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73,869
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.33
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information relating
to the Vocada, Multi-Vision, or our immaterial fiscal 2009
acquisitions because such information is not material,
individually or in the aggregate, to our financial results. The
unaudited pro forma results of operations are not necessarily
indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had
the transactions actually taken place at the beginning of the
periods indicated.
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Contingent acquisition payment arrangements related to
acquisitions completed during fiscal 2009, 2008, or 2007 are
discussed above in Note 3. However, we remain party to
certain contingent consideration arrangements relative to
acquisitions completed prior to those fiscal years. Those
arrangements are discussed below.
Earn-out
Payments
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic) in February 2005, a deferred payment of
$17.5 million was due and paid to the former shareholders
of Phonetic on February 1, 2007. We also agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of $35.0 million upon
achievement of certain established financial and performance
targets, in accordance with the merger agreement. We have
notified the former shareholders of Phonetic that the financial
and performance targets were not achieved. Accordingly, we have
not recorded any obligations relative to these measures as of
September 30, 2009. The former shareholders of Phonetic
have objected to this determination and have filed for
arbitration.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any claims we may have. If no claims are made, the escrowed
amounts will be released to the former shareholders of the
acquired companies. Generally, we cannot make a determination,
beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow will become
payable to the former shareholders of these companies until the
escrow period has expired. Accordingly these amounts have been
treated as contingent purchase price until it is determined
81
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
that the escrow will be payable, at which time the escrowed
amounts may be recorded as additional purchase price and
allocated to goodwill.
The following table summarizes the terms of the escrow
arrangements that were not released as of September 30,
2009 (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially Scheduled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow
|
|
|
|
|
Share Payment
|
|
|
|
Release Date
|
|
Cash Payment
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Focus(a)
|
|
March 26, 2008
|
|
$
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
eScription(b)
|
|
May 20, 2009
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
SNAPin(c)
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
X-Solutions
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
eCopy
|
|
December 30, 2010
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,650
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion of amounts held in escrow following their initially
scheduled release date:
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We filed a claim against the Focus Infomatics, Inc. escrow
related to the breach of certain representations and warranties
made in the share purchase agreement. We determined that the
entire escrow would be paid to either satisfy liabilities
indemnified under the agreement or paid to the former
shareholders. Accordingly, an amount equal to the escrow was
recorded as additional purchase price during fiscal 2008. The
escrow was released in October 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
We filed a claim against the escrow related to the breach of
certain representations and warranties made in the merger
agreement. 1.0 million shares held in escrow were released
during fiscal 2009. We expect the remaining amount to remain in
escrow until the settlement of the contingent liabilities is
finalized. |
|
(c) |
|
We released these shares in October 2009. |
In connection with the escrow relating to the eScription
acquisition, we guaranteed a minimum market value of $17.7954
per share when the escrow shares are released. If the market
value was less than $17.7954 per share on the date of release,
we would be required to pay the difference, if any, and limited
to $5.0 million, in cash. In May 2009, upon release of all
but 103,000 of the escrow shares, which remain in escrow at
September 30, 2009, we paid the maximum $5.0 million
cash payment to the former shareholders of eScription. This
payment was recorded as a reduction to additional
paid-in-capital.
82
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal years
2009 and 2008, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,249,642
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
355,648
|
|
Escrow amounts released
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Purchase price increases due to earn-out achievements
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,655,773
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
200,501
|
|
Escrow amounts released
|
|
|
30,869
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,891,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in fiscal 2009
consisted primarily of the following increases:
$18.9 million of additional purchase price upon our
election to treat our acquisition of eScription as an asset
purchase under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (as amended) and $10.8 million related to the
recording of contingent liabilities assumed; partially offset by
the following decreases: a $9.7 million reversal of assumed
deferred tax liabilities as a result of our election to treat
eScription as an asset purchase, $5.8 million related to
the utilization of acquired net operating losses from
acquisitions, a $6.3 million adjustment to deferred taxes,
and a $4.7 million decrease in accrued transaction costs.
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in fiscal 2008
consisted primarily of the following increases:
$15.4 million relating to the estimated fair value of
contingent liabilities assumed in connection with the
acquisition of BeVocal, $7.6 million due to a revised
estimate of the fair value of the intangible assets for customer
relationships relating to the acquisition of Tegic,
$10.4 million relating to an adjustment of assumed deferred
tax liabilities and $5.8 million related to the escrow
associated with our acquisition of Focus. In addition, we
increased goodwill by $2.8 million to correct an error in
the acquired balance sheet of Dictaphone for contractual
liabilities to a certain customer, incurred prior to the
acquisition date of March 31, 2006. These increases to
goodwill were partially offset by decreases which included
$23.8 million of additional acquired unbilled accounts
receivable identified in connection with the acquisition of
Tegic, and by $16.6 million related to the utilization of
acquired deferred tax assets in connection with certain of our
prior acquisitions.
83
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets consist of the following as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, which includes
$112.7 million and $33.5 million of licensed
technology, respectively (table in thousands, except for years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
565,654
|
|
|
$
|
(159,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
406,504
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
341,504
|
|
|
|
(83,882
|
)
|
|
|
257,622
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
17,543
|
|
|
|
(5,374
|
)
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
930,408
|
|
|
|
(251,403
|
)
|
|
|
679,005
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
958,208
|
|
|
$
|
(251,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
706,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
503,800
|
|
|
$
|
(93,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
410,515
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
192,341
|
|
|
|
(55,344
|
)
|
|
|
136,997
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
9,546
|
|
|
|
(3,584
|
)
|
|
|
5,962
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
710,856
|
|
|
|
(153,633
|
)
|
|
|
557,223
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
738,656
|
|
|
$
|
(153,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
585,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2009, we acquired a royalty free
paid-up
perpetual source and object code license from a third party for
$20.0 million in common stock. The estimated useful life of
this license is 7 years and this asset has been included
within the technology and patents grouping above. Also in June
2009, we amended the December 2008 agreement discussed below and
entered into a joint marketing and selling agreement with the
same third party and paid $7.0 million, consisting of
$2.0 million in cash and $5.0 million in common stock.
We have capitalized the $7.0 million payment as an
intangible asset, included in the tradenames, trademarks, and
other grouping above, and assigned a useful life of
3 years, commensurate with the legal term of the rights in
the arrangement. In addition to the $7.0 million paid in
June, we also agreed to pay an additional $13.0 million,
payable in common stock or cash at our option, upon the third
party meeting certain performance criteria under the agreement
by October 31, 2009. We are currently in the process of
evaluating whether such performance criteria were met.
In December 2008, we acquired a speech-related patent portfolio
from the same third party and a royalty free
paid-up
perpetual license providing us with access to, and use of, the
third partys speech-related source code for an aggregate
purchase price of $50.0 million. These assets are included
within the technology and patents asset grouping above. The
weighted average useful life related to these acquired assets is
8.7 years. We agreed to pay an additional license fee of up
to $20.0 million if certain revenue growth targets are met
in calendar 2009. Any additional license fee was to be payable
in cash or stock at our sole discretion on March 1, 2010.
In June 2009, this additional license fee provision was amended,
and as a result we no longer have any amounts due under this
agreement.
84
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense for acquired technology and patents is
included in the cost of revenue from amortization of intangible
assets in the accompanying statements of operations and amounted
to $38.4 million, $24.4 million and $13.1 million
in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization
expense for customer relationships; tradenames, trademarks, and
other; and non-competition agreements is included in operating
expenses and was $77.0 million, $58.2 million and
$24.6 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
years as of September 30, 2009, is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
45,512
|
|
|
$
|
80,657
|
|
|
$
|
126,169
|
|
2011
|
|
|
44,112
|
|
|
|
72,584
|
|
|
|
116,696
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40,345
|
|
|
|
63,799
|
|
|
|
104,144
|
|
2013
|
|
|
34,849
|
|
|
|
53,020
|
|
|
|
87,869
|
|
2014
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
46,736
|
|
|
|
74,753
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
64,787
|
|
|
|
104,587
|
|
|
|
169,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
257,622
|
|
|
$
|
421,383
|
|
|
$
|
679,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, excluding acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
197,176
|
|
|
$
|
200,892
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable under long-term contracts
|
|
|
15,311
|
|
|
|
15,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
|
212,487
|
|
|
|
216,830
|
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
|
|
(6,925
|
)
|
Less allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
(6,106
|
)
|
|
|
(6,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
199,548
|
|
|
$
|
203,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net of allowances, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Components and parts
|
|
$
|
6,479
|
|
|
$
|
4,429
|
|
Inventory at customers
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,525
|
|
|
$
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at customers reflects equipment related to in-process
installations of solutions with customers. These contracts have
not been recorded as revenue as of the balance sheet date, and
therefore the related equipment is recorded in inventory until
installation is complete.
85
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Land,
Building and Equipment, Net
|
Land, building and equipment, net at September 30, 2009 and
2008 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
Building
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
Computers, software and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
75,586
|
|
|
|
60,679
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2-7
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
13,491
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
|
9,071
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,366
|
|
|
|
95,193
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,898
|
)
|
|
|
(48,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,468
|
|
|
$
|
46,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, construction in progress related to
the build-out of hosted data centers. There were no
corresponding ongoing projects at September 30, 2008.
Depreciation expense, associated with building and equipment,
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $18.7 million,
$16.4 million and $12.1 million, respectively.
|
|
10.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
52,600
|
|
|
$
|
45,316
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
7,185
|
|
|
|
16,047
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
5,913
|
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
4,705
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
8,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
104,819
|
|
|
$
|
102,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
At September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had the following
borrowing obligations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Debentures, net of unamortized discount
of $5.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively
|
|
$
|
244,777
|
|
|
$
|
243,699
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
650,263
|
|
|
|
656,963
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Other
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
895,473
|
|
|
|
901,190
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
6,862
|
|
|
|
7,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
888,611
|
|
|
$
|
894,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt approximated
$893.2 million at September 30, 2009 and
$786.9 million at September 30, 2008. These fair value
amounts represent the value at which our lenders could trade our
debt within the financial markets, and do not represent the
settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to us at
each reporting date. The fair value of these long-term debt
issues will continue to fluctuate each period based on
fluctuations in market interest rates, and these fluctuations
may have little to no correlation to our outstanding debt
balances. The increase in fair value from September 30,
2008 to September 30, 2009 is attributable to the general
improvements in the debt markets. The term loan portion of our
Credit Facility is traded and the fair values are based upon
traded prices as of the reporting dates. The fair values of the
2.75% Convertible Debentures at each respective reporting
date were estimated using the averages of the September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008 bid and ask trading quotes. We
had no outstanding balance on the revolving credit line portion
of our Credit Facility. Our capital lease obligations and other
debt are not traded and the fair values of these instruments are
assumed to approximate their carrying values as of
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in 2027 (the 2027
Debentures) in a private placement to Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Total proceeds,
net of debt discount of $7.5 million and deferred debt
issuance costs of $1.1 million, were $241.4 million.
The 2027 Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum,
payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15,
2008, and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of
the holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the
2027 Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. The
related debt discount and debt issuance costs are being
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate
method through August 2014. As of September 30, 2009 and
2008, the ending unamortized discount was $5.2 million and
$6.3 million, respectively, and the ending unamortized
deferred debt issuance costs were $0.7 million and
$0.8 million, respectively. The 2027 Debentures are general
senior unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of
payment to all of our existing and future unsecured,
unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to
any indebtedness that is contractually subordinated to the 2027
Debentures. The 2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to
our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally
subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our
subsidiaries. If converted, the principal amount of the 2027
Debentures is payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess
of the $250 million principal amount, will (based on an
initial conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion
price of $19.47 per share, subject to adjustment) be paid in
cash or shares of our common stock, at our election, only in the
following circumstances and to the following extent: (i) on
any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the
87
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
previous fiscal quarter; (ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay cash and shares of our common stock (or, at our
election, cash in lieu of some or all of such common stock), if
any. If we undergo a fundamental change (as described in the
indenture for the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders
will have the option to require us to repurchase all or any
portion of their debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30,
2009, no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion
triggers were met, we could be required to repay all or some of
the principal amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
Credit
Facility
We entered into a credit facility which consists of a
$75 million revolving credit line including letters of
credit, a $355 million term loan entered into on
March 31, 2006, a $90 million term loan entered into
on April 5, 2007 and a $225 million term loan entered
into on August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility).
The term loans are due March 2013 and the revolving credit line
is due March 2012. As of September 30, 2009,
$650.3 million remained outstanding under the term loans,
there were $16.2 million of letters of credit issued under
the revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate
equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) the base rate (which is the higher of the corporate
base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate
plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR (equal to (i) the
British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rates for
deposits in U.S. dollars divided by (ii) one minus the
statutory reserves applicable to such borrowing). The applicable
margin for term loan borrowings under the Credit Facility ranges
from 0.75% to 1.50% per annum with respect to base rate
borrowings and from 1.75% to 2.50% per annum with respect to
LIBOR-based borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio. The
applicable margin for the revolving loan borrowings under the
Credit Facility ranges from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum with
respect to base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% per
annum with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our
leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2009, the applicable
margin for the term loan was 1.00% for base rate borrowings and
2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. We are required to pay a
commitment fee for unutilized commitments under the revolving
credit facility at a rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per
annum, based upon our leverage ratio. As of September 30,
2009, the commitment fee rate was 0.375% and the effective
interest rate was 2.27%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method through March 2012 for costs
associated with the revolving credit facility and through March
2013 for costs associated with the term loan. As of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the ending
88
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
unamortized deferred financing fees were $7.7 million and
$10.0 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility is subject to repayment in four equal
quarterly installments of 1% per annum ($6.7 million per
year, not including interest, which is also payable quarterly),
and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined in the Credit
Facility, which is payable beginning in the first quarter of
each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2008, based on the excess
cash flow generated in the previous fiscal year. No payment
under the excess cash flow sweep provision was due in the first
quarter of either fiscal 2009 or fiscal 2010 as there was no
excess cash flow generated in either of the respective prior
fiscal years. We will continue to evaluate the extent to which a
payment is due in the first quarter of future fiscal years based
on excess cash flow generation. At the current time, we are
unable to predict the amount of the outstanding principal, if
any, that may be required to be repaid in future fiscal years
pursuant to the excess cash flow sweep provisions. Any term loan
borrowings not paid through the baseline repayment, the excess
cash flow sweep, or any other mandatory or optional payments
that we may make, will be repaid upon maturity. If only the
baseline repayments are made, the annual aggregate principal
amount of the term loans repaid would be as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
650,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100%
of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings
under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
|
|
12.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009, we have two outstanding interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional
amount of $200 million. The interest rates on these swaps
are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit
Facility, and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010,
respectively. As of September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, the aggregate cumulative unrealized
losses related to these swaps, and a previous swap that matured
on March 31, 2009, were $4.0 million and
$0.9 million, respectively and were included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying balance
sheets.
Forward
Currency Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
On December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars. These contracts expired in September 2009 and
were designated as cash flow hedges.
89
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The impact of these settled contracts on results of operations
and other comprehensive income are detailed in the tables below.
We have no foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow
hedges outstanding at September 30, 2009.
Other
Derivative Activities
We have foreign currency contracts that are not designated as
hedges. Changes in fair value of foreign currency contracts not
qualifying as hedges are reported in earnings as part of other
income (expense), net. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency forward
contracts to offset foreign currency exposure on the deferred
acquisition payment of 44.3 million related to our
acquisition of PSRS, resulting in a net gain of
$8.0 million in other income (expense). The foreign
currency contracts matured and were settled on October 22,
2009.
In June 2009, we acquired certain intangible assets and issued
1,809,353 shares of our common stock, valued at
$25.0 million, as part of the total consideration. We also
issued an additional 315,790 shares of our common stock,
valued at $4.5 million, in June 2009 as a prepayment for
professional services. These shares issued are subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives, and are being accounted for separately from their
host agreements due to the determination that such instruments
would not be considered equity instruments if freestanding. The
security price guarantees require a payment from either us to
the third party, or from the third party to us based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, increases in fair value of
$2.3 million related to these security price guarantees are
reported in earnings as non-operating income within other income
(expense), net.
In October 2009, we entered into a five-year joint research
collaboration with a third party and made payments consisting of
1,047,120 shares of our common stock valued at
$16.0 million. These shares issued are subject to a
security price guarantee of the same nature as those described
above.
The following table provides a quantitative summary of the fair
value of our hedged and non-hedged derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 (table in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(879
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for fiscal 2009 and 2008 (tables in thousands):
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Fiscal Year Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
2,299
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157), now referred to
as ASC 820, relative to financial instruments on October 1,
2008. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be
received for an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Valuation techniques must maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
ASC 820 establishes a value hierarchy based on three levels of
inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the
third is considered unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
91
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2009 consisted of (table in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
403,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
403,250
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
10,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,013
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
Security price guarantees(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
413,263
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of our foreign currency exchange contracts is the
intrinsic value of the contracts based on observable inputs for
similar derivative instruments in active markets or quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are
not active or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a Black-Scholes model, derived from observable inputs such
as US treasury interest rates, our common stock price, and the
volatility of our common stock. The valuation model values both
the put and call components of the guarantees simultaneously,
with the net value of those components representing the fair
value of each instrument. |
Items Measured
at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets, including our cost-method investments, are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when indicators
of impairment are identified and such indicators appear to be
other than temporary. These assets are recognized at fair value
when they are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. During the fourth quarter 2009, we recognized a
$1.2 million impairment of our cost-method investment in a
non-public company, representing the deficiency in the estimated
fair value of our investment based on a quoted-price methodology
as compared to its carrying value. This impairment charge was
recorded as a non-operating loss in our fiscal 2009 consolidated
statement of operations. We did not record any impairment
charges for these assets during fiscal 2008 or 2007. Subsequent
to September 30, 2009, we entered into an additional
cost-method investment of a non-public company for approximately
$15.0 million.
|
|
14.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
We have, in connection with certain of our business
combinations, incurred restructuring costs. Restructuring costs
are typically comprised of severance costs, costs of
consolidating duplicate facilities and contract termination
costs. Restructuring expenses are based upon plans that have
been committed to by management, but are generally subject to
refinement during the purchase price allocation period
(generally within one year of the acquisition date). In addition
to plans resulting from the business combination, we have
historically acquired companies who have previously established
restructuring charges relating to lease exit costs. Regardless
of the origin of the lease exit
92
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
costs, we are required to make assumptions relating to sublease
terms, sublease rates and discount rates. We base our estimates
and assumptions on the best information available at the time of
the obligation having arisen. These estimates are reviewed and
revised as facts and circumstances dictate, with any changes
being recorded to goodwill or restructuring and other charges
(credits), net. Changes in these estimates could have a material
effect on the amount accrued on the balance sheet. Discussed in
detail below are two individually significant facilities which
were abandoned by the acquired company prior to our acquisition
of the company, and for which the obligations to the lessors, we
have assumed.
In connection with the acquisitions of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. in August 2003 and Former Nuance in
September 2005, we assumed two individually significant lease
obligations that were abandoned prior to the acquisition dates.
These obligations expire in 2016 and 2012, respectively, and the
fair value of the obligations, net of estimated sublease income,
was recognized as liabilities assumed by us in the allocation of
the final purchase price. The net payments have been discounted
in calculating the fair value of these obligations, and the
discount is being accreted through the term of the lease. Cash
payments net of sublease receipts are presented as cash used in
financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Additionally, we have implemented restructuring plans to
eliminate duplicate facilities, personnel or assets in
connection with business combinations. These costs are
recognized as liabilities assumed, and accordingly are included
in the allocation of the purchase price, generally resulting in
an increase to the recorded amount of the goodwill.
The activity for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008
and 2007, relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in
accrued business combination costs, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
59,221
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
60,065
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(12,412
|
)
|
|
|
(1,549
|
)
|
|
|
(13,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
49,240
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
$
|
50,019
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,564
|
)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
(12,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
41,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,178
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(14,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
34,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
37,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
12,144
|
|
|
$
|
9,166
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
24,904
|
|
|
|
32,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,048
|
|
|
$
|
41,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
Fiscal
2009
In fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, of which $5.3 million related to the
elimination of approximately 220 personnel across multiple
functions within our company.
Fiscal
2008
In fiscal 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$7.0 million, of which $4.2 million related to the
elimination of approximately 155 personnel across multiple
functions, $1.4 million related to a non-recurring, adverse
ruling arising from a vendors claims of underpayment of
historical royalties for technology discontinued in 2005 and
$1.4 million related to the consolidation or elimination of
excess facilities.
The following table sets forth the fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
accrual activity relating to restructuring and other charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4,173
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,801
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5,042
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(6,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Cash
paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
During fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, we made cash payments for
interest totaling $33.9 million, $50.0 million and
$31.4 million, respectively.
During fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, total net cash paid for
income taxes were $18.0 million, $5.6 million and
$3.5 million, respectively.
94
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
During fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, we issued shares of our
common stock in connection with several of our business and
asset acquisitions, including shares initially held in escrow.
Note 3 details the shares of our common stock, including
per share prices thereof, issued in fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007
to complete each of our business acquisitions during those
years. Note 6 details the same information with regard to
our fiscal 2009 intangible asset acquisitions. We did not
complete any significant asset acquisitions in fiscal 2008 or
2007.
Preferred
Stock
We are authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. We have designated
100,000 shares as Series A Preferred Stock and
15,000,000 shares as Series B Preferred Stock. In
connection with the acquisition of ScanSoft from Xerox
Corporation (Xerox), we issued 3,562,238 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock to Xerox. On March 19,
2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm, had agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock
held by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80 million,
including the 3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into
shares of common stock on a
one-for-one
basis. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation
preference of $1.30 per share plus all declared but unpaid
dividends. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are
entitled to non-cumulative dividends at the rate of $0.05 per
annum per share, payable when, and if, declared by the Board of
Directors. To date, no dividends have been declared by the Board
of Directors. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock have no
voting rights, except those rights provided under Delaware law.
The undesignated shares of preferred stock will have rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting
rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption
privileges and liquidation preferences, as shall be determined
by the Board of Directors upon issuance of the preferred stock.
We have reserved 3,562,238 shares of our common stock for
issuance upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.
Other than the 3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock that are issued and outstanding, there are no other shares
of preferred stock issued or outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 or September 30, 2008.
Common
Stock and Common Stock Warrants
Underwritten
Public Offerings in Fiscal 2008
On June 4, 2008, we completed an underwritten public
offering in which we sold 5,575,000 shares of our common
stock. Gross proceeds were $100.1 million, and the net
proceeds after underwriting commissions and other offering
expenses were $99.8 million.
On December 21, 2007, we completed an underwritten public
offering in which we sold 7,823,000 shares of our common
stock. Gross proceeds from this sale were $136.9 million,
and the net proceeds after underwriting commissions and other
offering expenses were $130.3 million.
Private
Placements of Securities
On January 13, 2009, we entered into a purchase agreement
by and among us, Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners L.P. (together, Warburg Pincus
X), pursuant to which Warburg Pincus X agreed to purchase,
and we agreed to sell, 17,395,626 shares of our common
stock at a purchase price of $10.06 per share and warrants
to purchase 3,862,422 shares of our common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $175.2 million. The warrants
have an exercise price of $11.57 and a term of four years. On
January 29, 2009, the sale of the shares and the warrants
pursuant to the purchase agreement was completed.
On May 20, 2008, in connection with our acquisition of
eScription, we sold 5,760,369 shares of our common stock
for a purchase price of $100.0 million, and warrants to
purchase 3,700,000 shares of our common stock for a
95
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchase price of $0.5 million, pursuant to the terms of a
purchase agreement dated April 7, 2008 with Warburg Pincus
Private Equity VIII, L.P. and certain of its affiliated entities
(collectively Warburg Pincus) (the Purchase
Agreement). The warrants have an exercise price of $20.00
per share and a term of four years. Warburg Pincus also agreed
not to sell any shares of our common stock for a period of six
months from the closing of the transaction contemplated by the
Purchase Agreement.
On May 5, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the Securities Purchase Agreement) with
Warburg Pincus pursuant to which Warburg Pincus agreed to
purchase, and we agreed to sell, 3,537,736 shares of our
common stock and warrants to purchase 863,236 shares of our
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$15.1 million. The warrants have an exercise price of $5.00
per share and a term of four years. On May 9, 2005, the
sale of the shares and the warrants pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement was completed, and on July 29, 2009,
Warburg Pincus exercised all 863,236 of the above-described
warrants at the stated exercise price. We also entered into a
Stock Purchase Agreement (the Stock Purchase
Agreement) with Warburg Pincus pursuant to which Warburg
Pincus agreed to purchase and we agreed to sell
14,150,943 shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase 3,177,570 shares of our common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million. The warrants
have an exercise price of $5.00 per share and a term of four
years. The warrants provide the holder with the option to
exercise the warrants on a net, or cashless, basis. On
September 15, 2005, the sale of the shares and the warrants
pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement was completed. The net
proceeds from these two fiscal 2005 financings were
$73.9 million. On September 15, 2009, Warburg Pincus
exercised all 3,177,570 of the above-described warrants at the
stated exercise price. As a result of the exercise of these
warrants and the 863,236 warrants described above, we issued an
aggregate 4,566,538 shares of our common stock to Warburg
Pincus during our fiscal fourth quarter 2009.
In connection with the fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2008 offerings, we
granted Warburg Pincus registration rights giving them the right
to request that we use commercially reasonable efforts to
register some or all of the shares of common stock issued to
them under each of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Stock
Purchase Agreement and Purchase Agreement, including shares of
common stock underlying the warrants.
Other
Common Stock Warrant Activity
On November 15, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of
Phonetic, we issued unvested warrants to purchase
750,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$4.46 per share that were to vest, if at all, upon the
achievement of certain performance targets. Based on our
assessment of the results relative to the financial and
performance measures, these warrants to purchase shares of our
common stock have not vested and will not vest. The former
shareholders of Phonetic have objected to this determination and
have filed for arbitration.
In March 1999, we issued Xerox a ten-year warrant with an
exercise price of $0.61 per share. This warrant is exercisable
for the purchase of 525,732 shares of our common stock. On
March 19, 2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus had agreed
to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock held by Xerox
Corporation, including this warrant, for approximately
$80.0 million. In connection with this transaction, Warburg
Pincus acquired new warrants to purchase 2.5 million
additional shares of our common stock for total consideration of
$0.6 million. The warrants have a six-year life and an
exercise price of $4.94 per share. The warrants provide the
holder with the option to exercise the warrants on a net, or
cashless, basis
In connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks in 2003, we
issued a warrant to our investment banker, expiring on
August 11, 2011, for the purchase of 150,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $3.98 per share. The
warrant provides the holder with the option to exercise the
warrants on a net, or cashless, basis. The warrant became
exercisable on August 11, 2005, and was valued at its
issuance at $0.2 million based upon the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. In October 2006, the warrant was exercised
to purchase 125,620 shares of our common stock. The holder
of the warrant elected a cashless exercise resulting in a net
issuance of 75,623 shares of our common stock. As of
September 30, 2009, a warrant to purchase
12,190 shares of our common stock remains outstanding.
96
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have determined that all of our common stock warrants should
be classified within the stockholders equity section of
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the
conclusion that the above-noted warrants are indexed to our
common stock and are exercisable only into our common stock.
|
|
18.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
|
|
14,325
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
27,057
|
|
|
|
24,394
|
|
|
|
20,293
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,867
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
15,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,407
|
|
|
$
|
68,631
|
|
|
$
|
48,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
We have share-based award plans under which employees, officers
and directors may be granted stock options to purchase our
common stock, generally at fair market value. During fiscal 2008
and 2009, stock options have been primarily granted to senior
management and officers of the Company. Our plans do not allow
for options to be granted at below fair market value, nor can
they be re-priced at any time. Options granted under plans
adopted by the Company become exercisable over various periods,
typically two to four years and have a maximum term of ten
years. We have also assumed options and option plans in
connection with certain of our acquisitions. These stock options
are governed by the plans and agreements that they were
originally issued under, but are now exercisable for shares of
our common stock.
97
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
20,654,083
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from BeVocal and VoiceSignal
|
|
|
795,994
|
|
|
$
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,183,450
|
|
|
$
|
14.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,742,274
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(555,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(94,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18,240,722
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from eScription
|
|
|
2,846,118
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
636,440
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,861,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(813,972
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(50,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
14,996,514
|
|
|
$
|
7.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from SNAPin
|
|
|
1,258,708
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,092,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,570,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(987,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(234,958
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,553,866
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
104.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
10,575,346
|
|
|
$
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
94.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
10,473,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
11,017,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on September 30, 2009 ($14.96)
and the exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of September 30, 2009, the total unamortized fair value
of stock options was $22.8 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 1.4 years. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date (including assumed options) fair
value and intrinsic value of stock options exercised is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
|
98
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value of the stock
options granted and unvested options assumed from acquisitions
were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|
|
53.9
|
%
|
|
|
49.7
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have
never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay
cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the historical
volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with
the expected life of the options and the historical implied
volatility from traded options with a term of 180 days or
greater. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average
U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during the period, which
approximates the rate in effect at the time of grant,
commensurate with the expected life of the instrument. We
estimate the expected term of options granted based on
historical exercise behavior.
Restricted
Awards
We are authorized to issue equity incentive awards in the form
of Restricted Awards, including Restricted Units and Restricted
Stock, which are individually discussed below. Unvested
Restricted Awards may not be sold, transferred or assigned. The
fair value of the Restricted Awards is measured based upon the
market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of
grant, reduced by the purchase price of $0.001 per share of the
awards. The Restricted Awards generally are subject to vesting
over a period of two to four years, and may have opportunities
for acceleration for achievement of defined goals. We also
issued certain Restricted Awards with vesting solely dependent
on the achievement of specified performance targets. The fair
value of the Restricted Awards is amortized to expense over the
awards applicable requisite service periods using the
straight-line method. In the event that the employees
employment with the Company terminates, or in the case of awards
with only performance goals, if those goals are not met, any
unvested shares are forfeited and revert to the Company.
99
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Time-Based
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
2,728,999
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
813,000
|
|
|
|
4,662,923
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(942,569
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(103,638
|
)
|
|
|
(369,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
729,417
|
|
|
|
6,079,383
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of eScription
|
|
|
367,253
|
|
|
|
438,791
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,543,365
|
|
|
|
3,812,617
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(199,208
|
)
|
|
|
(2,866,528
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(26,303
|
)
|
|
|
(606,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,414,524
|
|
|
|
6,857,524
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of SNAPin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,446
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,292,617
|
|
|
|
5,392,361
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(291,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865,505
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(575,018
|
)
|
|
|
(928,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,840,673
|
|
|
|
8,755,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
1.0 years
|
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
42.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
131.0 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,338,422
|
|
|
|
7,521,997
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
1.0 years
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
35.0 million
|
|
|
$
|
112.5 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on September 30, 2009 ($14.96) and the
exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of September 30, 2009, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$123.2 million, which will, based on expectations of future
performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value, including
those assumed in respective periods, and intrinsic value of all
Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
11.39
|
|
|
$
|
18.01
|
|
|
$
|
14.73
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
33.25
|
|
|
$
|
55.50
|
|
|
$
|
13.40
|
|
100
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock is included in the issued and outstanding
common stock in these financial statements at date of grant. The
table below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
1,547,341
|
|
|
$
|
5.93
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
17,421
|
|
|
$
|
8.75
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(368,860
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.29
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,195,902
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
15.89
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(820,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
625,070
|
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(625,070
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for vested Restricted Stock is $0.001 per
share. As of September 30, 2009, there is no unearned
stock-based compensation expense related to unvested Restricted
Stock. A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value and
intrinsic value of Restricted Stock vested are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
15.89
|
|
|
$
|
8.75
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
8.65
|
|
|
$
|
16.85
|
|
|
$
|
5.60
|
|
In order to satisfy our employees withholding tax
liability as a result of the vesting of Restricted Stock, we
have historically repurchased shares upon the employees
vesting. Similarly, in order to satisfy our employees
withholding tax liability as a result of the release of our
employees Restricted Units, we have historically cancelled
a portion of the common stock upon the release. In fiscal 2009,
we paid cash of $10.4 million relating to 0.9 million
shares of common stock that were repurchased or cancelled. Based
on our estimate of the Restricted Awards that will vest, or be
released, in fiscal 2010, and further assuming that one-third of
these Restricted Awards would be repurchased or cancelled to
satisfy the employees withholding tax liability (such
amount approximating the tax rate of our employees), we would
have an obligation to pay cash relating to approximately
1.8 million shares during fiscal 2010.
1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan), as
amended and restated on April 21, 2008, authorizes the
issuance of a maximum of 6,000,000 shares of common stock
in semi-annual offerings to employees at a price equal to the
lower of 85% of the closing price on the applicable offering
commencement date or 85% of the closing price on the applicable
offering termination date. Stock-based compensation expense for
the employee stock purchase plan is recognized for the fair
value benefit accorded to participating employees. At
September 30, 2009, 1,565,127 shares were reserved for
future issuance. During fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, we issued
1,153,805, 651,121 and 640,777 shares of common stock under
this plan, respectively. The weighted average fair value of all
purchase rights granted in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, were
$3.49, $5.09 and $4.51. Stock-based compensation
101
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expense related to the employee stock purchase plan was
$3.7 million, $3.4 million and $2.2 million for
the fiscal years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The fair value of the purchase rights granted under this plan
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model that uses the following weighted-average
assumptions, which were derived in a manner similar to those
discussed above relative to stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
|
|
44.7
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
We have various operating leases for office space around the
world. In connection with many of our acquisitions, we assumed
facility lease obligations. Among these assumed obligations are
lease payments related to certain office locations that were
vacated by certain of the acquired companies prior to the
acquisition date (Note 14). Additionally, certain of our
lease obligations have been included in various restructuring
charges (Note 15). The following table outlines our gross
future minimum payments under all non-cancelable operating
leases as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Other Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Obligations Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
18,448
|
|
|
$
|
4,196
|
|
|
$
|
13,547
|
|
|
$
|
36,191
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
13,965
|
|
|
|
33,797
|
|
2012
|
|
|
15,880
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
|
|
29,546
|
|
2013
|
|
|
14,874
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
17,605
|
|
2014
|
|
|
12,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
14,957
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
39,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
|
|
42,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
118,243
|
|
|
$
|
8,603
|
|
|
$
|
47,769
|
|
|
$
|
174,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, we have subleased certain office
space that is included in the above table to third parties.
Total sublease income under contractual terms is
$17.5 million and ranges from approximately
$1.5 million to $4.4 million on an annual basis
through February 2016.
Total rent expense charged to operations was approximately
$19.6 million, $15.2 million and $9.3 million for
the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
102
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In August 2001, the first of a number of complaints was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, on behalf of a purported class of persons who
purchased stock of Former Nuance, which we acquired in September
2005, between April 12, 2000 and December 6, 2000.
Those complaints have been consolidated into one action. The
complaint generally alleges that various investment bank
underwriters engaged in improper and undisclosed activities
related to the allocation of shares in Former Nuances
initial public offering of securities. The complaint makes
claims for violation of several provisions of the federal
securities laws against those underwriters, and also against
Former Nuance and some of the Former Nuances directors and
officers. Similar lawsuits, concerning more than 250 other
companies initial public offerings, were filed in 2001. In
February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss with respect
to the claims against Former Nuance. In the third quarter of
2003, a proposed settlement in principle was reached among the
plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including Former Nuance) and
the issuers insurance carriers. The settlement called for
the dismissal and release of claims against the issuer
defendants, including Former Nuance, in exchange for a
contingent payment to be paid, if necessary, by the issuer
defendants insurance carriers and an assignment of certain
claims. The settlement was not expected to have any material
impact, as payments, if any, were expected to be made by
insurance carriers, rather than by us. On December 5, 2006,
the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the
Courts order certifying a class in several test
cases that had been selected by the underwriter defendants
and plaintiffs in the coordinated proceeding. The plaintiffs
petitioned the Second Circuit for rehearing of the Second
Circuits decision, however, on April 6, 2007, the
Second Circuit denied the petition for rehearing. At a status
conference on April 23, 2007, the district court suggested
that the issuers settlement could not be approved in its
present form, given the Second Circuits ruling. On
June 25, 2007 the district court issued an order
terminating the settlement agreement. The plaintiffs in the case
have since filed amended master allegations and amended
complaints. On March 26, 2008, the Court largely denied the
defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaints. On
April 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for
preliminary approval of a new proposed settlement between
plaintiffs, the underwriter defendants, the issuer defendants
and the insurers for the issuer defendants. Under the
settlement, which remains subject to Court approval, the
insurers would pay the full amount of the settlement
attributable to Former Nuance, and Former Nuance would not bear
any financial liability. The Court issued an order granting
preliminary approval of the settlement, dated June 9, 2009,
and a hearing on final approval of the settlement was held on
September 10, 2009. On October 5, 2009, the court
issued an opinion granting plaintiffs motion for final
approval of the settlement, approval of the plan of distribution
of the settlement fund and certification of the settlement
classes. On October 20, 2009, a petition for permission to
appeal the courts October 5, 2009 certification of
the settlement classes was filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. Due to the inherent
uncertainties of litigation, we are unable to determine the
ultimate outcome or potential range of loss, if any.
Vianix LLC has filed three legal actions against us, consisting
of two breach of contract actions and a copyright infringement
claim. It is too early for us to reach a conclusion as to the
ultimate outcome or proposed settlement of these actions or to
estimate the potential loss that could result from a settlement
or adverse judgment against us in these matters. However, we
believe that we have substantial defenses against these claims,
and intend to defend them vigorously.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above litigation
matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail, our
operating results, financial position and cash flows could be
adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all, cases,
our total liability under such provisions is limited to either
the value of the contract or a specified, agreed
103
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
upon amount. In some cases our total liability under such
provisions is unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term
of the indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum
potential amount of future payments we could be required to make
under all the indemnification provisions is unlimited, we
believe the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal
due to the low frequency with which these provisions have been
triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
At September 30, 2009, we have $1.9 million of
non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventory to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog.
|
|
20.
|
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
We have established a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan covers substantially
all of our U.S. employees who meet minimum age and service
requirements, and allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Effective
July 1, 2003, Company match of employees
contributions was established. We match 50% of employee
contributions up to 4% of eligible salary. Employees who were
hired prior to April 1, 2004 were 100% vested into the plan
as soon as they started to contribute to the plan. Employees
hired April 1, 2004 and thereafter, vest one-third of the
contribution annually over a three-year period. Our
contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $3.2 million,
$2.9 million and $1.8 million for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
In accordance with the provisions set forth in ASC 715, we
recognized the funded status, which is the difference between
the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit
obligations, of our postretirement benefit plans in the
consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. The adjustment
to accumulated other comprehensive loss at adoption represents
the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior
service costs, both of which were previously netted against the
plans funded status in our consolidated balance sheet
pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, also now
included, as amended, within ASC 715. These amounts will be
subsequently recognized as net periodic pension expense.
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain
significant defined benefit pension plans in connection with our
acquisition of Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and
death benefits for former Dictaphone employees located in the
United Kingdom and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to
new participants.
104
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the changes in fiscal 2009 and 2008 in
the projected benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
of the defined benefit pension plans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
22,408
|
|
|
$
|
23,741
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(2,456
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
22,850
|
|
|
|
22,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
23,366
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
(3,021
|
)
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
Plan participants contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
(2,011
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of period
|
|
|
17,549
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of period
|
|
$
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,958
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(6,425
|
)
|
|
|
(5,969
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
as of September 30, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
|
|
(4,953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(4,953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following represents the amounts included in accumulated
other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009, that we expect to recognize in earnings
during fiscal 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
The projected benefit obligations for the two defined benefit
pension plans was $22.8 million at September 30, 2009.
Included in the table below are the amounts relating to our UK
pension plans, which have accumulated benefit obligations and
projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Aggregate projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
19,967
|
|
|
$
|
19,426
|
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligations
|
|
|
19,967
|
|
|
|
19,426
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
13,542
|
|
|
|
13,456
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized gain (loss)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used in developing the benefit
obligations and net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Average compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate of compensation increase is not applicable as there are no
active members in the plan. |
We considered several factors when developing the expected
return on plan assets, including reviewing analysis of returns
relevant to the country where each plan is in effect, historical
rates of return from investments, local actuarial projections
and market outlook from investment managers. The expected rate
of return disclosed above is the weighted average of each
countrys expected return on plan assets.
106
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets
Allocation and Investment Strategy:
The percentages of the fair value of pension plan assets
actually allocated and targeted for allocation, by asset
category, at September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment goal for pension plan assets is designed to
provide as much assurance as is possible, in our opinion, that
the pension assets are available to pay benefits as they come
due and minimize market risk. The expected long-term rate of
return for the plan assets is 6.7% for the UK pension plan and
for the Canadian pension plan.
Employer
Contributions:
We expect to contribute $1.4 million to our pension plans
in fiscal 2010. Included in this contribution is a minimum
funding requirement associated with our UK pension which
requires an annual minimum payment of £859,900
(approximately $1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2009) for each year through fiscal 2014.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments:
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,095
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
(23,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,888
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
22,553
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
10,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
28,189
|
|
|
$
|
(15,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
State
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
10,782
|
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,673
|
|
|
|
14,063
|
|
|
|
8,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
14,952
|
|
|
|
20,177
|
|
|
|
11,421
|
|
State
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
|
|
(20,796
|
)
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
14,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
40,391
|
|
|
$
|
14,554
|
|
|
$
|
22,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory
federal rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Foreign taxes
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Foreign benefit refundable credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
(48.2
|
)
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
State tax law enactment, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible expenditures
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
(192.2
|
)
|
|
|
103.9
|
|
Executive compensation
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
Federal credits, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
143.3
|
%
|
|
|
(93.8
|
)%
|
|
|
265.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009, the tax provision includes a charge of
$8.0 million related to the Companys election to
treat the eScription acquisition as an asset purchase. Also
included in the fiscal 2009 tax provision is a charge of
$3.2 million as a result of the Massachusetts state tax law
enactment relating to the utilization of net operating losses.
During fiscal 2008, a tax benefit of $20.4 million was
recorded when the tax law in Massachusetts was changed which
reduced the tax rate that certain deferred tax liabilities would
be taxed at when reported in the tax provision in the future.
Included in this benefit is $8.0 million related to the
treatment of the eScription acquisition as a stock purchase,
which the Company subsequently elected to treat as an asset
purchase in 2009, as noted above.
The cumulative amount of undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries amounted to $54.1 million at
September 30, 2009. We have not provided any additional
federal or state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on
the undistributed earnings, as such earnings have been
indefinitely reinvested in the business. An estimate of the tax
consequences from the repatriation of these earnings is not
practicable at this time resulting from the complexities of the
utilization of foreign tax credits and other tax assets.
108
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
225,660
|
|
|
$
|
194,547
|
|
Federal and state credit carryforwards
|
|
|
19,241
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Capitalized development costs
|
|
|
26,351
|
|
|
|
23,302
|
|
Accrued expenses and other reserves
|
|
|
51,315
|
|
|
|
75,079
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
14,490
|
|
|
|
13,576
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
18,335
|
|
|
|
15,914
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
9,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
367,002
|
|
|
|
347,991
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(239,671
|
)
|
|
|
(182,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
127,331
|
|
|
|
165,030
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(180,148
|
)
|
|
|
(210,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(52,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets(a)
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets(b)
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities(c)
|
|
|
(1,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liability(d)
|
|
|
(56,346
|
)
|
|
|
(46,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(52,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(c) |
|
Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(d) |
|
Included in deferred tax liability in the consolidated balance
sheets. |
As of September 30, 2009, our valuation allowance for
U.S. net deferred tax assets totaled $207.7 million,
which consists of $156.0 million in beginning allowance,
plus a $15.7 million increase to income tax provision due
to increases in net deferred tax assets in fiscal 2009 and a
$36.0 million increase in valuation allowance resulting
from goodwill and acquisition related adjustments. A portion of
the deferred tax liabilities are created resulting from the
different treatment of goodwill for book and tax purposes which
cannot offset deferred tax assets in determining the valuation
allowance.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, $164.3 million and
$124.5 million, respectively, of our valuation allowance is
associated with tax assets arising from business combinations.
When and if any of this valuation allowance is released, will be
recorded as a benefit in the statement of operations upon our
adoption of ASC 805 on October 1, 2010.
At September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had U.S. federal
net operating loss carryforwards of $600.6 million and
$546.4 million, respectively, of which $186.7 million
and $194.9 million, respectively, relate to tax deductions
from stock-based compensation. At September 30, 2009 and
2008, we had state net operating loss carryforwards of
109
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$170.2 million and $133.5 million, respectively. At
September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had federal research and
development carryforwards of $13.0 million and
$8.2 million, respectively. At September 30, 2009 and
2008, we had state research and development credit carryforwards
of $6.9 million and $7.1 million, respectively. The
net operating loss and credit carryforwards are subject to an
annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations
provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state
tax provisions. These carryforwards will expire at various dates
beginning in 2009 and extending through 2028, if not utilized.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), now
referred to as ASC 740-10 and we began establishing reserves for
tax uncertainties that reflect the use of the comprehensive
model for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax
positions. Under the comprehensive model, reserves are
established when we have determined that it is more likely than
not that a tax position will or will not be sustained and at the
greatest amount for which the result is more likely than not. As
a result of the adoption of ASC
740-10,
during fiscal 2008, we recognized an adjustment of
$0.9 million in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized
tax benefits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during prior periods
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases for interest charges
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Increases for acquisitions
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases for tax settlements
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of year
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, $12.1 million of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect our
effective tax rate. We do not expect a significant change in the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next
12 months. We recognized interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in our provision for income taxes and
had accrued $0.9 million of such interest and penalties as
of September 30, 2009.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, various state
and local taxes, and international income taxes in numerous
jurisdictions. The federal, state and foreign tax returns are
generally subject to tax examinations for the tax years ended in
2005 through 2008.
|
|
22.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, now referred to as ASC 280, which establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments.
ASC 280 also established standards for disclosures about
products, services and geographic areas. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker (CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
We have several customer-facing market groups that oversee the
core markets where we conduct business. Beginning in fiscal
2009, these groups were referred to as Mobile-Enterprise,
Healthcare-Dictation, and Imaging. Each of these market groups
has a president who has direct responsibility and oversight
related to
go-to-market
110
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
strategies and plans, product management and product marketing
activities. These groups do not directly manage centralized or
shared resources or the allocation decisions regarding the
activities related to these functions, which include sales and
sales operations, certain research and development initiatives,
business development and all general and administrative
activities. Our CODM directly oversees each of the presidents,
as well as each of the functions that provide the shared and
centralized activities noted above. To manage the business,
allocate resources and assess performance, the CODM primarily
reviews revenue data by market group, while reviewing gross
margins, operating margins, and other measures of income or loss
on a consolidated basis. Thus, we have determined that we
operate in one segment.
The following table presents revenue information for our three
core markets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise
|
|
$
|
462,316
|
|
|
$
|
438,785
|
|
|
$
|
246,762
|
|
Healthcare-Dictation
|
|
|
418,373
|
|
|
|
349,744
|
|
|
|
281,290
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
69,663
|
|
|
|
79,933
|
|
|
|
73,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
$
|
868,462
|
|
|
$
|
601,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
706,858
|
|
|
$
|
669,239
|
|
|
$
|
471,636
|
|
International
|
|
|
243,494
|
|
|
|
199,223
|
|
|
|
130,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
$
|
868,462
|
|
|
$
|
601,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets. Our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, were located as follows (table
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,395,923
|
|
|
$
|
2,066,106
|
|
International
|
|
|
307,864
|
|
|
|
264,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,703,787
|
|
|
$
|
2,330,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A member of our Board of Directors is also a partner at Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, a
law firm that provides professional services to us. These
services may from
time-to-time
include contingent fee arrangements. For fiscal 2009, 2008 and
2007, we paid $8.7 million, $13.1 million and
$8.6 million, respectively, to Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati for professional services. As of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had $1.7 million and
$2.6 million, respectively, included in accounts payable
and accrued expenses to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati.
Two members of our Board of Directors are employees of Warburg
Pincus, a significant shareholder. On January 29, 2009 and
May 20, 2008, we consummated stock purchase agreements with
Warburg Pincus. See Note 17 for further information.
111
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
24.
|
Quarterly
Data (Unaudited)
|
The following information has been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements that, in the opinion of
management, include all recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of such information (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
216,834
|
|
|
$
|
229,145
|
|
|
$
|
241,040
|
|
|
$
|
263,333
|
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
134,534
|
|
|
$
|
140,767
|
|
|
$
|
147,081
|
|
|
$
|
168,419
|
|
|
$
|
590,801
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(24,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,067
|
|
|
$
|
(1,009
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,290
|
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
236,237
|
|
|
|
250,656
|
|
|
|
260,750
|
|
|
|
266,932
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
236,237
|
|
|
|
269,187
|
|
|
|
260,750
|
|
|
|
285,948
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
195,024
|
|
|
$
|
203,302
|
|
|
$
|
216,744
|
|
|
$
|
253,392
|
|
|
$
|
868,462
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
126,183
|
|
|
$
|
119,506
|
|
|
$
|
137,859
|
|
|
$
|
169,271
|
|
|
$
|
552,819
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,425
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,791
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,014
|
|
|
$
|
(30,068
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
194,528
|
|
|
|
206,348
|
|
|
|
213,683
|
|
|
|
224,568
|
|
|
|
209,801
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
194,528
|
|
|
|
206,348
|
|
|
|
213,683
|
|
|
|
246,525
|
|
|
|
209,801
|
|
On October 9, 2009, we entered into a five-year joint
research collaboration with a third party to accelerate the
development of
state-of-the
art speech offerings for enterprise and mobile technologies and
consumer electronics. All new technologies derived from the
collaboration will be jointly-owned by the two parties. In
consideration for the services from the third party in the
collaboration efforts, we will pay $80.0 million in five
equal payments of $16.0 million at the beginning of each
year, over the five-year period, payable in cash or our common
stock, at our option. These payments will be recorded as prepaid
R&D services and amortized into R&D expense ratably
over each annual period. Any payments under this arrangement
made in our common stock are subject to a security price
guarantee. The security price guarantee requires a payment from
either us to the third party, or from the third party to us
based upon the difference between the price of our common stock
on the issue date and an average price of our common stock
approximately six months following the issue date. On
October 14, 2009, we made our first payment under the
arrangement consisting of 1,047,120 shares of common stock
valued at $16.0 million.
112
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed (i) to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed and summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;
and,
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009,
utilizing the criteria set forth in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on the results of this assessment,
management (including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer) has concluded that, as of September 30,
2009, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
The attestation report concerning the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2009 issued by BDO Seidman, LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, appears in
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
113
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
since we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for our
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Proxy Statement), within 120 days
of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, and
certain information to be included in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item concerning our directors
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
section titled Election of Directors in our Proxy
Statement. Information required by this item concerning our
executive officers is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth in the section entitled Executive
Compensation, Management and Other Information in our
Proxy Statement. Information regarding Section 16 reporting
compliance is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section entitled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy
Statement.
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees on
February 24, 2004. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
can be found at our website: www.nuance.com. We will provide to
any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. Such a request should be made in
writing and addressed to Investor Relations,
Nuance Communications, Inc., 1 Wayside Road, Burlington, MA
01803.
To date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics. We will post any waivers, if and when
granted, of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.nuance.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item regarding executive
compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section titled Executive Compensation,
Management and Other Information in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholders Matters
|
The information required by this item regarding security
ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Equity Compensation
Plans in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
It is the policy of the Board that all transactions required to
be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
be subject to approval by the Audit Committee of the Board. In
furtherance of relevant NASDAQ rules and our commitment to
corporate governance, the charter of the Audit Committee
provides that the Audit Committee shall review and approve any
proposed related party transactions including, transactions
required to be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
for potential conflict of interest situations. The Audit
Committee reviews the material facts of all transactions that
require the committees approval and either approves or
disapproves of the transaction. In determining whether to
approve a transaction, the Audit Committee will take into
account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally
available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or
similar circumstances.
114
The additional information required by this item regarding
certain relationships and related party transactions is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Related Party Transactions and
Director Independence in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this section is incorporated by
reference from the information in the section entitled
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
(1) Financial Statements See Index to Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules
have been omitted as the requested information is inapplicable
or the information is presented in the financial statements or
related notes included as part of this Report.
(3) Exhibits See Item 15(b) of this Report
below.
(b) Exhibits.
115
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Paul A. Ricci
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Paul A. Ricci
Paul
A. Ricci, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Thomas L. Beaudoin
Thomas
L. Beaudoin, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Daniel D. Tempesta
Daniel
D. Tempesta, Chief Accounting Officer and
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Frankenberg
Robert
J. Frankenberg, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Patrick T. Hackett
Patrick
T. Hackett, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ William H. Janeway
William
H. Janeway, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Katharine A. Martin
Katharine
A. Martin, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Mark Myers
Mark
Myers, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Philip Quigley
Philip
Quigley, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 25, 2009
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Teresi
Robert
G. Teresi, Director
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, made and
entered into as of February 1, 2005, and effective as of
November 15, 2004, by and among ScanSoft, Phonetics
Acquisition Ltd., Phonetic Systems Ltd. and Magnum
Communications Fund L.P., as Shareholder Representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/7/2005
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Phoenix Merger Sub, Inc. and Dictaphone Corporation dated
as of February 7, 2006.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/9/2006
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2007, by and
among AOL LLC, Tegic Communications, Inc. and Nuance
Communications, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
6/27/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance, Vicksburg
Acquisition Corporation, Voice Signal Technologies, Inc., U.S.
Bank National Association, as Escrow Agent, and Stata Venture
Partners, LLC, as Stockholder Representative, dated as of
May 14, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
5/18/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Beryllium Acquisition Corporation, Beryllium Acquisition
LLC and BeVocal, Inc. dated as of February 21, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/27/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated March 13, 2007 by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc., Bethany Advisors Inc., Focus Softek
India (Private) Limited and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Escrow Agent.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
3/28/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.7
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Csonka Acquisition Corporation, Csonka Acquisition LLC,
Commissure Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow
agent, and Michael J. Mardini, as the shareholder representative
dated as of September 28, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/4/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.8
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Vineyard Acquisition Corporation, Vineyard Acquisition
LLC, Vocada, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow
Agent, and John Purtell, as Stockholder Representative, dated as
of October 16, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.9
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Vanhalen Acquisition Corporation, Vanhalen Acquisition
LLC, Viecore, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow
Agent, and Thoma Cressey Bravo, Inc., as Stockholder
Representative, dated as of October 21, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/25/2007
|
|
|
|
2
|
.10
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., Easton Acquisition Corporation, eScription, Inc., U.S.
Bank National Association, as Escrow Agent and Paul Egerman as
Stockholder Representative, dated as of April 7, 2008.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
4/11/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.11
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement (Relating to shares in Philips Speech
Recognition Systems GmbH) between Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V. and Nuance Communications, Inc. dated as of
September 26, 2008.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.12
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., SpeakEasy Acquisition Corporation, SpeakEasy Acquisition
LLC, SNAPin Software, Inc., Thomas S. Huseby as Stockholder
Representative and U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow
Agent, dated as of August 13, 2008.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.13
|
|
Amendment effective as of September 24, 2008, by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc., SpeakEasy Acquisition Corporation,
SpeakEasy Acquisition LLC, SNAPin Software, Inc., Thomas S.
Huseby as Stockholder Representative and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Escrow Agent.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 20, 2007, by and
among Nuance Communications, Inc., Vanhalen Acquisition
Corporation, VanHalen Acquisition LLC, Viecore, Inc., and Thoma
Cressey Bravo, Inc. as Shareholder Representative.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.3
|
|
2/11/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.15
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 29, 2007, by and
among Nuance Communications, Inc. and Thoma Cressey Bravo, Inc.
as the representative of the Companys shareholders.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.4
|
|
2/11/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.16
|
|
Arrangement Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2009, by
and between Nuance Communications, Inc. and Zi Corporation.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/27/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.17
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 30,
2009, by and among Nuance Communications, Inc., Epic Acquisition
Corporation, Epic Acquisition LLC, eCopy, Inc., U.S. Bank
National Association, as Escrow Agent, and Gary Hall, as
Stockholder Representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/6/2009
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
11/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended.
|
|
S-3
|
|
333-142182
|
|
3.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
8-A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
12/6/1995
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-70603
|
|
Annex A
|
|
1/14/1999
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated March 15, 2004,
issued to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg
Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.3
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated May 9, 2005, issued
to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-125496
|
|
4.11
|
|
6/3/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Indenture, dated as of August 13, 2007, between Nuance
Communications, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (including form of 2.75% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures due 2027).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
8/17/2007
|
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008 by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified on
Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P.,
Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII, C.V.I., WP-WP
VIII Investors, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
4/11/2008
|
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2009, by and
among Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified
on Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
1/16/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of
January 29, 2009, by and among Nuance Communications, Inc.,
Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I, and WP-WPVIII
Investors, L.P., Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
10.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement Number 1, dated as of
August 21, 2000, by and between the Registrant and Paul A.
Ricci.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-49656
|
|
4.3
|
|
11/9/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Caere Corporation 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-33464
|
|
10.4
|
|
3/29/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.17
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated on
April 27, 2000.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
Annex D
|
|
4/13/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated 1995 Directors Stock Option
Plan, as amended.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.19
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-74343
|
|
99.1
|
|
3/12/1999
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
2000 NonStatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
ScanSoft 2003 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.2
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1994 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.4
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.17
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.18
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.19
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
2005 Severance Benefit Plan for Executive Officers.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Officer Short-term Disability Plan.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Technology Transfer and License Agreement, dated as of
January 30, 2003, between Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.30
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Letter, dated February 17, 2003, from the Registrant to
Jeanne McCann regarding certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/15/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 9, 2004, by and between
the Registrant and John Shagoury.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Letter, dated May 23, 2004, from the Registrant to Steven
Chambers regarding certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Letter dated September 25, 2006, from the Registrant to Don
Hunt regarding certain employment matters.
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.29
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 5,
2007, among Nuance Communications, Inc., the Lenders party
thereto from time to time, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as
administrative agent, Citicorp North America, Inc., as
syndication agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
documentation agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS
Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers, Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and Banc Of America Securities LLC, as
co-arrangers, and Citigroup Global Markets INC., UBS Securities
LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint bookrunners.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
4/11/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2007, among
Nuance, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent,
Citicorp North America, INC., as syndication agent, Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as documentation agent, the
Lenders, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS Securities LLC,
as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, as joint bookrunner and co-arranger, and
Banc Of America Securities LLC, as co-arranger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
4/11/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of August 24, 2007, by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the other parties identified
therein, to the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Facility dated as of April 5, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/30/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2006, by
and between the Registrant and Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (Performance Based Vesting),
dated as of October 10, 2006, by and between the Registrant
and Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (Time Based Vesting), dated
as of October 10, 2006, by and between the Registrant and
Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Letter, dated June 3, 2008, from the Registrant to Thomas
L. Beaudoin regarding certain employment matters.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.39
|
|
12/1/2008
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
December 29, 2008, by and between Nuance Communications,
Inc. and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Plan.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
2/5/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 23, 2009, by and between Nuance Communications, Inc.
and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
6/26/2009
|
|
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Registrants Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
14.1
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney. (See Signature Page).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |