Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-04065
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
13-1955943 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
37 West Broad Street
|
|
|
Columbus, Ohio
|
|
43215 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
614-224-7141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 27, 2011, there were approximately 27,245,000 shares of Common Stock, without
par value, outstanding.
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
128,264 |
|
|
$ |
132,266 |
|
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts,
September $618 and June $570) |
|
|
85,118 |
|
|
|
63,762 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
35,827 |
|
|
|
36,785 |
|
Finished goods and work in process |
|
|
74,421 |
|
|
|
75,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
110,248 |
|
|
|
111,885 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
19,995 |
|
|
|
25,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
343,625 |
|
|
|
333,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
|
142,652 |
|
|
|
141,175 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
268,048 |
|
|
|
263,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
410,700 |
|
|
|
404,624 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
223,700 |
|
|
|
219,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
185,282 |
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
89,840 |
|
|
|
89,840 |
|
Other intangible assets net |
|
|
8,059 |
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
633,933 |
|
|
$ |
622,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
45,151 |
|
|
$ |
42,570 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
35,562 |
|
|
|
33,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
80,713 |
|
|
|
76,156 |
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
13,489 |
|
|
|
13,646 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
17,225 |
|
|
|
14,748 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding
September 27,250,441 shares; June 27,385,781 shares |
|
|
97,754 |
|
|
|
97,197 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,162,933 |
|
|
|
1,150,683 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6,993 |
) |
|
|
(7,043 |
) |
Common stock in treasury, at cost |
|
|
(731,188 |
) |
|
|
(723,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
522,506 |
|
|
|
517,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
633,933 |
|
|
$ |
622,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
274,516 |
|
|
$ |
265,051 |
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
219,086 |
|
|
|
206,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
55,430 |
|
|
|
58,071 |
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
22,918 |
|
|
|
23,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
32,512 |
|
|
|
34,826 |
|
|
Interest Income and Other Net |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
32,508 |
|
|
|
34,842 |
|
|
Taxes Based on Income |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
21,258 |
|
|
$ |
22,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
.81 |
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Common Share |
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
28,037 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,258 |
|
|
$ |
22,767 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,038 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes |
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
Pension plan activity |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(21,408 |
) |
|
|
(15,767 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
(9,749 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,563 |
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on property additions |
|
|
(4,278 |
) |
|
|
(6,725 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,672 |
) |
|
|
(6,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(7,890 |
) |
|
|
(10,732 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(9,008 |
) |
|
|
(8,409 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock awards, including tax benefits |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Increase in cash overdraft balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(16,893 |
) |
|
|
(16,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(4,002 |
) |
|
|
(13,460 |
) |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
132,266 |
|
|
|
100,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
128,264 |
|
|
$ |
87,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the
interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments
reflected in the interim consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal
recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative
of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise noted, the term year and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal
year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 2012 refers to fiscal 2012, which is
the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012.
Subsequent Events
We have evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent fiscal quarter and the
date the financial statements were issued and noted no events that would require recognition or
disclosure in these financial statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Purchases of
property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Construction in progress in accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,843 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
These purchases, less the preceding June 30 balances, have been excluded from the property
additions and the change in accounts payable in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Held for Sale
As a result of various prior-years restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain
held for sale properties with a total net book value of approximately $2.8 million at September
30, 2011. This balance is included in Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In
accordance with GAAP for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these held
for sale assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (restricted stock and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to
employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends
prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the
two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive
potential common shares associated with restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation
rights.
6
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,258 |
|
|
$ |
22,767 |
|
Net income available to participating securities |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
21,231 |
|
|
$ |
22,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
Incremental share effect from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
28,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
.81 |
|
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was
approximately $21.3 million and $22.8 million, respectively. The September 30, 2011 and 2010
comprehensive income consists of net income and pension and postretirement amortization.
Significant Accounting Policies
There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 2011
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation Retirement Benefits Multiemployer Plans:
Disclosures about an Employers Participation in a Multiemployer Plan (ASU 11-09). This ASU
requires that employers provide additional separate quantitative and qualitative disclosures for
multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 11-09 will be
effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption
permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other:
Testing Goodwill for Impairment (ASU 11-08). This ASU permits an entity to first assess
qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary
to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair
value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its
fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 will be effective for annual and interim
goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early
adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of
Comprehensive Income (ASU 11-05). This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to
eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of shareholders equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of
comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two
separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05
7
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
will be effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at
September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included in the
Specialty Foods segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Trademarks (40-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
13,020 |
|
|
$ |
13,020 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(5,225 |
) |
|
|
(4,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
7,795 |
|
|
$ |
8,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carrying Value |
|
$ |
8,059 |
|
|
$ |
8,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense relating to these assets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
Total annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
$ |
946 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
946 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
946 |
|
2016 |
|
$ |
775 |
|
2017 |
|
$ |
604 |
|
Note 4 Long-Term Debt
At September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, we had an unsecured revolving credit facility under
which we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand
the total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and
certain other conditions. The facility expires in October 2012, and all outstanding amounts are
then due and payable. At September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding
under this facility. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. At September 30, 2011, we
had approximately $6.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount
available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility.
We paid no interest for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness,
asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test
that requires us to maintain
8
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an
indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all
times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as defined more
specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined more
specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing
Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined more specifically in the credit agreement). At September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, we
were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the
requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facilitys covenants for the foreseeable
future. At September 30, 2011, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under
the facility.
Note 5 Pension Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have sponsored multiple defined benefit pension
plans covering union workers at certain locations. As a result of restructuring activities in
recent years, we no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost or otherwise
eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily based on
negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount
required by regulation or contract.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for our pension
plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, we made pension plan contributions totaling
approximately $1.0 million. We do not expect to make any further contributions to our pension plans
during the remainder of 2012.
Note 6 Postretirement Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life
insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service.
Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.
9
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for our
postretirement plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net gain |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Amortization of prior service asset |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, we made approximately $36,000 in contributions
to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately
$0.2 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans
during the remainder of 2012.
Note 7 Stock-Based Compensation
Our shareholders approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster Colony
Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the 2005 Plan). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for
issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will be
exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting
period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but generally
these awards have a maximum term of five years.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSSARs)
as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping
to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARs exercise from new
shares that had been previously authorized. There were no grants of SSSARs during the three months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and no SSSARs vested during these periods.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation cost was
reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees
salaries expense classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax
benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to SSSARs. These windfall tax benefits were
included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table
summarizes SSSARs compensation expense and tax benefits recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
Tax benefits |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
Intrinsic value of exercises |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Gross windfall tax benefits |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
10
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan for
the three months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life in Years |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
324 |
|
|
$ |
53.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
38.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
58.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
322 |
|
|
$ |
54.01 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable and vested at end of period |
|
|
98 |
|
|
$ |
48.93 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at end of period |
|
|
316 |
|
|
$ |
54.04 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, there was approximately $1.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.79
years.
Restricted Stock
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our
nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping
to create long-term shareholder value. There were no grants of restricted stock during the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and no restricted stock vested during these periods.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation cost was
reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees
salaries expense classification and was allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax
benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to restricted stock. Windfall tax benefits, if
any, were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The
following table summarizes restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
Tax benefits |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Gross windfall tax benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the
2005 Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period |
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
54.86 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock at end of period |
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
54.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, there was approximately $1.0 million of unrecognized compensation
expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of
approximately 1.60 years.
11
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 8 Income Taxes
The gross tax contingency reserve at September 30, 2011 was approximately $1.8 million and
consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $1.0 million and penalties and interest of
approximately $0.8 million. We have classified approximately $0.1 million of the gross tax
contingency reserve as current liabilities as these amounts are expected to be resolved within the
next 12 months. The remaining liability of approximately $1.7 million is included in other
noncurrent liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next
12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial
position or results of operations. We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax
liabilities in income tax expense.
Note 9 Business Segment Information
The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the
basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 2011
consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
236,947 |
|
|
$ |
220,512 |
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
37,569 |
|
|
|
44,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
274,516 |
|
|
$ |
265,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
35,199 |
|
|
$ |
37,973 |
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Corporate Expenses |
|
|
(2,350 |
) |
|
|
(3,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,512 |
|
|
$ |
34,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at September 30, 2011, we were a party to various
claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have
a material effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate
disposition will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (CDSOA) provides for the distribution
of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our
reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $14.4 million for fiscal year 2011 and were received
in the second and fourth quarters. CDSOA remittances have related to certain candles being imported
from the Peoples Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of CDSOA to duties
collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of
annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that
relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs.
Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts
challenging CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that
the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is
unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and
the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This effectively ended the constitutional
challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging CDSOA remain active.
12
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will
be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other
factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to
entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions we
may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.
13
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Tabular dollars in thousands)
OVERVIEW
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and our financial condition as of
September 30, 2011. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted,
references to year pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 2012 refers to fiscal 2012, which is
the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the
results of our operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011, including the trends in
our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The forward-looking
statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and uncertainties including
statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our
actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption Forward-Looking Statements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products
focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture
and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Although not material to our consolidated
operations, we are also engaged in the distribution of various products, including glassware and
candles, to commercial markets. Our operations are organized in two reportable segments: Specialty
Foods and Glassware and Candles. The sales of each segment are predominantly domestic.
In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of
industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods
segment. Fiscal years prior to 2009 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we
divested various nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods
segment.
We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and
profitability due to attributes such as:
|
|
|
leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception; |
|
|
|
|
a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts; |
|
|
|
|
well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts; |
|
|
|
|
recognized leadership in foodservice product development; |
|
|
|
|
experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities. |
Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business over time by:
|
|
|
leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and
introduce new products; |
|
|
|
growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product
development and quality; and |
|
|
|
pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria. |
14
We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and
future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, our total capital
expenditures for 2012 are not expected to exceed $23 million.
Summary of 2012 Results
The following is a comparative overview of our consolidated operating results for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased 4% to approximately $274.5
million from the prior-year total of $265.1 million. This sales increase reflects higher sales in
the Specialty Foods segment as partially offset by a decline in sales of the Glassware and Candles
segment. The Specialty Foods segments increase reflects higher retail and foodservice sales. The
decrease in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment primarily reflects lower unit volume.
Gross margin decreased 5% to approximately $55.4 million from the prior-year total of $58.1
million. Substantially higher material costs contributed to the lower gross margin.
Net income for the quarter was approximately $21.3 million, or $.78 per diluted share,
compared to $22.8 million, or $.81 per diluted share, in the prior year.
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Net Sales and Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
236,947 |
|
|
$ |
220,512 |
|
|
$ |
16,435 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
37,569 |
|
|
|
44,539 |
|
|
|
(6,970 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
274,516 |
|
|
$ |
265,051 |
|
|
$ |
9,465 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
55,430 |
|
|
$ |
58,071 |
|
|
$ |
(2,641 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales for the first quarter increased 4%, reflecting higher sales in the
Specialty Foods segment as partially offset by lower sales in the Glassware and Candles segment.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment totaled
approximately $236.9 million, an increase of 7% from the prior-year total of $220.5 million. Higher
product pricing totaled approximately five percent of segment net sales. In addition to the higher
pricing, retail sales also reflected the incremental benefit from some recently-introduced or newer
food products. Sales volumes were also higher among branded retail products, especially frozen
items. The segments foodservice sales also increased on expanded volumes associated with programs
among existing customers.
Net sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for the quarter ended September 30, 2011
totaled approximately $37.6 million, a 16% decrease from the prior-year total of $44.5 million. The
decline in net sales was influenced by the exiting of some lower-margin business, including some
seasonal candle programs, with higher pricing helping to offset some of these declines. We expect
this segments sales to again markedly decline in the quarter ending December 31, 2011, primarily
as a result of lower seasonal sales of candles.
As a percentage of sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three months ended September
30, 2011 was 20.2%, as compared to 21.9% achieved in the prior-year comparative period. Higher
raw-material costs contributed to the lower percentage.
In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages declined for the quarter, reflecting
comparatively higher ingredient costs (especially for soybean oil and flour), as partially offset
by higher
pricing. We estimate that higher material costs adversely affected our gross margins by
approximately seven percent of segment net sales. Looking forward, under current market conditions,
we see our material costs
15
continuing to pose a comparative challenge through the second quarter of
2012, but anticipate less of an impact for the second half of the year.
Gross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment declined slightly from the
prior-year period primarily due to the impact of continued higher wax costs, lower sales and
reduced production levels. These factors were somewhat mitigated by higher pricing and an improved
sales mix. We expect the segments gross margins to remain similarly challenged through the second
quarter of 2012.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
$ |
22,918 |
|
|
$ |
23,245 |
|
|
$ |
(327 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $22.9 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 decreased by 1% from the $23.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010, and were lower as a percentage of sales compared to the same period in
the prior year due to lower consumer-directed marketing costs and lower corporate expenses related
to real estate available for sale.
Operating Income (Loss)
The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately
$32.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. By segment, our operating income can
be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
$ |
35,199 |
|
|
$ |
37,973 |
|
|
$ |
(2,774 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Corporate Expenses |
|
|
(2,350 |
) |
|
|
(3,149 |
) |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,512 |
|
|
$ |
34,826 |
|
|
$ |
(2,314 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glassware and Candles |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income and Other Net
Interest income and other was less than $0.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2011
and 2010.
Income Before Income Taxes
As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 decreased by approximately $2.3 million to $32.5 million from the
prior-year total of $34.8 million. Our effective tax rate of 34.6% for the three months ended
September 30, 2011 was comparable to the prior-year rate of 34.7%.
Net Income
First quarter net income for 2012 of approximately $21.3 million decreased from the
prior-years net income for the quarter of $22.8 million, as influenced by the factors noted above.
Net income per share for the first quarter of 2012 totaled approximately $.78 per basic and diluted
share, as compared to $.81 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year.
16
FINANCIAL CONDITION
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities
totaled approximately $17.6 million as compared to $9.3 million in the prior-year period. The
increase results from the relative changes in working capital, particularly the lower level of
inventory held in the Glassware and Candles segment. The increase in receivables since June 2011
primarily relates to seasonal influences on sales within the Glassware and Candles segment but is
also impacted by higher sales in the Specialty Foods segment.
Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was
approximately $4.7 million as compared to $6.3 million in the prior year. This decrease reflects a
lower level of capital expenditures in 2012 as we substantially completed the expansion of our
frozen roll facility in Kentucky during June 2011.
Cash used in financing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2011 of
approximately $16.9 million increased slightly from the prior-year total of $16.4 million. This
increase was due to the relative changes in the cash overdraft balance and higher dividend
payments, as partially offset by a lower level of share repurchases in the current year. At
September 30, 2011, approximately 1,483,000 shares remained authorized for future buyback under the
existing share repurchase program.
Under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million
at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings outstanding
under this facility at September 30, 2011. The facility expires in October 2012, and all
outstanding amounts are then due and payable. At September 30, 2011, we had approximately $6.7
million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing
on the unsecured revolving credit facility.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness,
asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage.
At September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the
facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facilitys covenants for the foreseeable
future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness
and limit our access to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require
curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or
investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At September
30, 2011, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.
We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and
equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to
meet our foreseeable cash requirements. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under
current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.
For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the consolidated
financial statements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our
consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchase obligations, are not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of items not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw
materials or inventory that have not yet been received as of September 30, 2011 and future minimum
lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from
expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand, there have been no significant changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in our
2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 2011
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
17
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation Retirement Benefits Multiemployer Plans:
Disclosures about an Employers Participation in a Multiemployer Plan (ASU 11-09). This ASU
requires that employers provide additional separate quantitative and qualitative disclosures for
multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 11-09 will be
effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption
permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other:
Testing Goodwill for Impairment (ASU 11-08). This ASU permits an entity to first assess
qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary
to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair
value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its
fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 will be effective for annual and interim
goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early
adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of
Comprehensive Income (ASU 11-05). This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to
eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of shareholders equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of
comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two
separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05 will be effective for public companies for interim
and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not
expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results
of operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws.
Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words anticipate, estimate,
project, believe, intend, plan, expect, hope or similar words. These statements discuss
future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial
conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions
and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These
forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited,
control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes
these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on
such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements,
except as required by law. More detailed statements regarding significant events that could affect
our financial results are included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
available on our website at www.lancastercolony.com.
Specific influences relating to these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels; |
|
|
|
|
the continued solvency of key customers; |
|
|
|
|
the success and cost of new product development efforts; |
|
|
|
|
the lack of market acceptance of new products; |
|
|
|
|
the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement; |
18
|
|
|
changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation
or customer goodwill; |
|
|
|
changes in market trends; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated; |
|
|
|
|
the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs; |
|
|
|
efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead
utilization in candle operations; |
|
|
|
the overall strength of the economy; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
slower than anticipated sales growth; |
|
|
|
|
the extent of operational efficiencies achieved; |
|
|
|
|
price and product competition; |
|
|
|
the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further
strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials; |
|
|
|
adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of
producing, distributing or transporting our products; |
|
|
|
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels,
contributions required and benefit costs; |
|
|
|
maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including
import sources of production; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
stability of labor relations; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on contract copackers and limited or exclusive sources for certain goods; |
|
|
|
|
effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters; |
|
|
|
legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000; |
|
|
|
|
access to any required financing; |
|
|
|
|
changes in income tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
unknown costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate; |
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments; |
|
|
|
|
the outcome of any litigation or arbitration; and |
|
|
|
|
innumerable other factors. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2011 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
evaluated, with the
participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September
30, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is 1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and 2) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our
19
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No changes were made to our internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the
Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 2011
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(c) In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of
2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 1,483,000 shares remained authorized for future
repurchases at September 30, 2011. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated
expiration date. In the first quarter, we made the following repurchases of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares That May |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
|
July 1-31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,618,350 |
|
August 1-31, 2011 |
|
|
75,221 |
|
|
$ |
57.57 |
|
|
|
75,221 |
|
|
|
1,543,129 |
|
September 1-30, 2011 |
|
|
60,178 |
|
|
$ |
59.14 |
|
|
|
60,178 |
|
|
|
1,482,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
135,399 |
|
|
$ |
58.27 |
|
|
|
135,399 |
|
|
|
1,482,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Index to Exhibits following Signatures.
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 7, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.
|
|
|
|
John B. Gerlach, Jr. |
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: November 7, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ John L. Boylan
|
|
|
|
John L. Boylan |
|
|
|
Treasurer, Vice President,
Assistant
Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer
and Director
(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
21
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Located at |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith |
22