Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 001-33887
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
39-1847269 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification number) |
|
|
|
2210 Woodland Drive, Manitowoc, Wisconsin
|
|
54220 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (920) 892-9340
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of accelerated filer,
large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 23,010,653 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding on November 4, 2011.
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
Table Of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Financial Statements |
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,560 |
|
|
$ |
15,559 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $436 and $485 |
|
|
27,618 |
|
|
|
21,637 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
29,507 |
|
|
|
32,844 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
73,142 |
|
|
|
76,374 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
30,017 |
|
|
|
30,233 |
|
Patents and licenses, net |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
Long-term accounts receivable |
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
114,990 |
|
|
$ |
120,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
12,479 |
|
|
$ |
10,384 |
|
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
2,683 |
|
Deferred revenue, current |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,202 |
|
|
|
18,495 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
Deferred revenue, long-term |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
22,603 |
|
|
|
27,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: Shares authorized: 30,000,000 shares at March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2011; no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value: Shares authorized: 200,000,000 at March 31, 2011 and September
30, 2011; shares issued: 30,312,758 and 30,403,067 at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011;
shares outstanding: 22,893,803 and 23,010,653 at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
124,805 |
|
|
|
126,002 |
|
Shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
Treasury stock: 7,418,955 and 7,392,414 common shares at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 |
|
|
(31,708 |
) |
|
|
(31,757 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
92,387 |
|
|
|
93,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
114,990 |
|
|
$ |
120,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.
3
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
15,086 |
|
|
$ |
18,718 |
|
|
$ |
30,844 |
|
|
$ |
40,397 |
|
Service revenue |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
15,853 |
|
|
|
19,260 |
|
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
42,034 |
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
12,059 |
|
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
27,063 |
|
Cost of service revenue |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
12,441 |
|
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
28,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
13,855 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
7,504 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
6,860 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
14,005 |
|
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(2,643 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Dividend and interest income |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(2,525 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,638,638 |
|
|
|
22,989,502 |
|
|
|
22,581,188 |
|
|
|
22,955,655 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,901,590 |
|
|
|
22,989,502 |
|
|
|
23,007,067 |
|
|
|
22,955,655 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.
4
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used
in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
Change in allowance for notes and accounts receivable |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
4,014 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(7,715 |
) |
|
|
(3,337 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(6,454 |
) |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
(2,095 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(8,633 |
) |
|
|
1,924 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
Purchase of property and equipment held under operating leases |
|
|
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Additions to patents and licenses |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
Proceeds from repayment of shareholder notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(10,040 |
) |
|
|
3,999 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
23,364 |
|
|
|
11,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
13,324 |
|
|
$ |
15,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued from treasury for shareholder note receivable |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
Shares surrendered into treasury from stock option exercise |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.
5
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Organization
The Company includes Orion Energy Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, and all consolidated
subsidiaries. The Company is a developer, manufacturer and seller of lighting and energy management
systems and a seller and integrator of renewable energy technologies to commercial and industrial
businesses, predominantly in North America.
In August 2009, the Company created Orion Engineered Systems, a new operating division
offering additional alternative renewable energy systems. During the quarter ended December 31,
2010, the new division exceeded the thresholds for segment reporting and, accordingly, the Company
introduced the presentation of operating segments in that quarter. See Note I Segment Reporting
of these financial statements for further discussion of our reportable segments.
The Companys corporate offices and manufacturing operations are located in Manitowoc,
Wisconsin and an operations facility occupied by Orion Engineered Systems is located in Plymouth,
Wisconsin.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Where appropriate, certain reclassifications have been made to prior years financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 2012 or other interim periods.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required
by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2011.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during that reporting period. Areas that require the use
of significant management estimates include revenue recognition, inventory obsolescence and bad
debt reserves, accruals for warranty expenses, income taxes and certain equity transactions.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
6
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term investments with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Short-term Investments
The amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities, with gross unrealized gains and
losses, as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
Short Term |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Bank certificate of deposit |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
Short Term |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Bank certificate of deposit |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, the Companys financial assets described in the
table above were measured at fair value on a recurring basis employing quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets (level 1 inputs).
The Companys certificate of deposit is pledged as security for an equipment lease.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximate their respective
fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. Based upon interest rates
currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, the carrying value of the Companys
long-term debt is also approximately equal to its fair value. Valuation techniques used to measure
fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
GAAP describes a fair value hierarchy based on the following three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1 Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for which significant inputs are
observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Valuations are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are
both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Inputs reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability
at the measurement date.
Accounts Receivable
The majority of the Companys accounts receivable are due from companies in the commercial,
industrial and agricultural industries, as well as from wholesalers. Credit is extended based on an
evaluation of a customers financial condition. Generally, collateral is not required for end
users; however, the payment of certain trade accounts receivable from wholesalers is secured by
irrevocable standby letters of credit. Accounts receivable are due within 30-60 days. Accounts
receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances. The
Company provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to an
allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current status of individual
accounts. Balances that are still outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection
efforts are written off through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to
accounts receivable.
7
Financing Receivables
The Company considers its lease balances included in consolidated current and long-term
accounts receivable from its Orion Throughput Agreement, or OTA, sales-type leases to be financing
receivables. Additional disclosures on the credit quality of the Companys OTA receivables included
in accounts receivable are as follows:
Aging Analysis as of September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-90 days |
|
|
Greater than 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales-type |
|
|
|
Not Past Due |
|
|
past due |
|
|
days past due |
|
|
Total past due |
|
|
leases |
|
Lease balances included
in consolidated accounts
receivable current |
|
$ |
2,659 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
2,702 |
|
Lease balances included in
consolidated accounts
receivable long-term |
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross sales-type leases |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales-type leases |
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
8,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Companys allowance for credit losses is based on managements assessment of the
collectability of customer accounts. A considerable amount of judgment is required in order to make
this assessment, including a detailed analysis of the aging of the lease receivables and the
current credit worthiness of the Companys customers and an analysis of historical bad debts and
other adjustments. If there is a deterioration of a major customers credit worthiness or if actual
defaults are higher than historical experience, the estimate of the recoverability of amounts due
could be adversely affected. The Company reviews in detail the allowance for doubtful accounts on a
quarterly basis and adjusts the allowance estimate to reflect actual portfolio performance and any
changes in future portfolio performance expectations. The Company did not incur any provision
write-offs or credit losses against its OTA sales-type lease receivable balances in either fiscal
2011 or for the six months ended September 30, 2011.
Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials and components, such as ballasts, metal sheet and coil
stock and molded parts; work in process inventories, such as frames and reflectors; and finished
goods, including completed fixtures and systems, and wireless energy management systems and
accessories, such as lamps, meters and power supplies. All inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or market value with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company
reduces the carrying value of its inventories for differences between the cost and estimated net
realizable value, taking into consideration usage in the preceding 12 months, expected demand, and
other information indicating obsolescence. The Company records as a charge to cost of product
revenue the amount required to reduce the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value. As
of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, the Company had inventory obsolescence reserves of
$811,000 and $818,000, respectively.
Costs associated with the procurement and warehousing of inventories, such as inbound freight
charges and purchasing and receiving costs, are also included in cost of product revenue.
Inventories were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Raw materials and components |
|
$ |
12,005 |
|
|
$ |
12,347 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
17,043 |
|
|
|
19,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,507 |
|
|
$ |
32,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist primarily of deferred costs related to
in-process OTA projects, prepaid insurance premiums, prepaid license fees, purchase deposits, advance payments to contractors, advance
commission payments and miscellaneous receivables.
8
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Land and land improvements |
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
15,104 |
|
|
|
15,170 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment |
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
10,613 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Equipment leased to customers under Power Purchase Agreements |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
Plant equipment |
|
|
8,067 |
|
|
|
8,461 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,243 |
|
|
|
42,195 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(10,226 |
) |
|
|
(11,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
$ |
30,017 |
|
|
$ |
30,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, using the
straight-line method. Depreciable lives by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements |
|
10 15 years |
Buildings |
|
10 39 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
Shorter of asset life or life of lease |
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment |
|
2 10 years |
Plant equipment |
|
3 10 years |
Patents and Licenses
Patents and licenses are amortized over their estimated useful life, ranging from 7 to 17
years, using the straight line method.
Long-Term Receivables
The Company records a long-term receivable for the non-current portion of its sales-type
capital lease OTA contracts. The receivable is recorded at the net present value of the future cash
flows from scheduled customer payments. The Company uses the implied cost of capital from each
individual contract as the discount rate. Long-term receivables from OTA contracts were $5.4
million as of September 30, 2011.
Also included in other long-term receivables are amounts due from a third party finance
company to which the Company has sold, without recourse, the future cash flows from OTAs entered
into with customers. Such receivables are recorded at the present value of the future cash flows
discounted between 8.8% and 11%. As of September 30, 2011, the following amounts were due from the
third party finance company in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
$ |
955 |
|
Fiscal 2014 |
|
|
1,015 |
|
Fiscal 2015 |
|
|
958 |
|
Fiscal 2016 |
|
|
310 |
|
Fiscal 2017 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross long-term receivable |
|
|
3,247 |
|
Less: amount representing interest |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net long-term receivable |
|
$ |
2,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Assets
Other long-term assets include long-term security deposits, prepaid licensing costs and
deferred financing costs. Other long-term assets include $55,000 and $152,000 of deferred financing
costs as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011. Deferred financing
costs related to debt issuances are amortized to interest expense over the life of the related
debt issue (2 to 10 years).
9
Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include warranty accruals, accrued wages and benefits, accrued vacation,
sales tax payable and other various unpaid expenses. No accrued expenses exceeded 5% of current
liabilities as of either March 31, 2011, or September 30, 2011.
The Company generally offers a limited warranty of one year on its own manufactured products in addition to
those standard warranties offered by major original equipment component manufacturers. The
manufacturers warranties cover lamps and ballasts, which are significant components in the
Companys manufactured products.
Changes in the Companys warranty accrual were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Provision to product cost of revenue |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Charges |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company offers a financing program, called an OTA, for a customers lease of the Companys
energy management systems. The OTA is structured as a sales-type capital lease and upon successful
installation of the system and customer acknowledgement that the system is operating as specified,
product revenue is recognized at the Companys net investment in the lease, which typically is the
net present value of the future cash flows.
The Company offers a separate program, called a power purchase agreement, or PPA, for the
Companys renewable energy product offerings. A PPA is a supply side agreement for the generation
of electricity and subsequent sale to the end user. Upon the customers acknowledgement that the
system is operating as specified, product revenue is recognized on a monthly basis over the life of
the PPA contract, typically in excess of 10 years.
Other than for OTA and PPA sales, revenue is recognized when the following four criteria are
met:
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; |
|
|
|
|
delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer; |
|
|
|
|
the sales price is fixed and determinable and no further obligation exists; and |
|
|
|
|
collectability is reasonably assured |
These four criteria are met for the Companys product-only revenue upon delivery of the
product and title passing to the customer. At that time, the Company provides for estimated costs
that may be incurred for product warranties and sales returns. Revenues are presented net of sales
tax and other sales related taxes.
For sales contracts consisting of multiple elements of revenue, such as a combination of
product sales and services, the Company determines revenue by allocating the total contract revenue
to each element based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, the Company uses a
hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (1)
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value, if available, (2) third-party evidence
(TPE) of selling price if VSOE is not available, and (3) best estimate of the selling price if
neither VSOE nor TPE is available (a description as to how the Company determined VSOE, TPE and
estimated selling price is provided below).
The nature of the Companys multiple element arrangements is similar to a construction
project, with materials being delivered and contracting and project management activities occurring
according to an installation schedule. The significant deliverables include the shipment of
products and related transfer of title and the installation.
10
To determine the selling price in multiple-element arrangements, the Company established VSOE
of the selling price for its HIF lighting and energy management system products using the price
charged for a deliverable when sold separately. In addition, the Company records in service revenue
the selling price for its installation and recycling services using managements best estimate of
selling price, as VSOE or TPE evidence does not exist. Service revenue is recognized when services
are completed and customer acceptance has been received. Recycling services provided in connection
with installation entail the disposal of the customers legacy lighting fixtures. The Companys
service revenues, other than for installation and recycling that are completed prior to delivery of
the product, are included in product revenue using managements best estimate of selling price, as
VSOE or TPE evidence does not exist. These services include comprehensive site assessment, site
field verification, utility incentive and government subsidy management, engineering design, and
project management. For these services and for installation and recycling services, managements
best estimate of selling price is determined by considering several external and internal factors
including, but not limited to, pricing practices, margin objectives, competition, geographies in
which the Company offers its products and services and internal costs. The determination of
estimated selling price is made through consultation with and approval by management, taking into
account all of the preceding factors.
To determine the selling price for solar renewable product and services sold through the
Companys Engineered Systems division, the Company uses managements best estimate of selling price
giving consideration to external and internal factors including, but not limited to, pricing
practices, margin objectives, competition, scope and size of individual projects, geographies in
which the Company offers its products and services and internal costs. The Company has completed a
limited number of renewable project sales and accordingly, does not have sufficient VSOE or TPE
evidence.
Costs of products delivered, and services performed, that are subject to additional
performance obligations or customer acceptance are deferred and recorded in prepaid expenses and
other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These deferred costs are expensed at the
time the related revenue is recognized. Deferred costs amounted to $0.8 million and $2.4 million
as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011.
Deferred revenue relates to advance customer billings, investment tax grants received related
to PPAs and a separate obligation to provide maintenance on OTAs, and is classified as a liability
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the maintenance is readily determinable based
upon pricing from third-party vendors. Deferred revenue related to maintenance services is
recognized when the services are delivered, which occurs in excess of a year after the original OTA
is executed.
Deferred revenue was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Deferred revenue current liability |
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
Deferred revenue long term liability |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
$ |
2,039 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of
temporary differences between financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities,
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to be in effect when the temporary
differences reverse. Deferred income taxes also arise from the future tax benefits of operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is established when management determines
that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
ASC 740, Income Taxes, also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not
to be sustained upon examination. The Company has classified the amounts recorded for uncertain
tax benefits in the balance sheet as other liabilities (non-current) to the extent that payment is
not anticipated within one year. The Company recognizes penalties and interest related to
uncertain tax liabilities in income tax expense. Penalties and interest are immaterial and are
included in the unrecognized tax benefits.
Deferred tax benefits have not been recognized for income tax effects resulting from the
exercise of non-qualified stock options. These benefits will be recognized in the period in which
the benefits are realized as a reduction in taxes payable and an increase in
additional paid-in capital. For the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, there were
none and $0.3 million realized tax benefits from the exercise of stock options.
11
Stock Option Plans
The fair value of each option grant for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010 and
2011 was determined using the assumptions in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Weighted average expected term |
|
|
8.3 years |
|
|
|
6.8 years |
|
|
|
5.8 years |
|
|
|
5.7 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
49.5%-58.4 |
% |
Expected forfeiture rate |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for
the period and does not consider common stock equivalents.
Diluted net income per common share reflects the dilution that would occur if warrants and
employee stock options were exercised. In the computation of diluted net income per common share,
the Company uses the treasury stock method for outstanding options and warrants. Diluted net loss
per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share for the periods ended September 30,
2011, because the effects of potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. The effect of net
income (loss) per common share is calculated based upon the following shares (in thousands except
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (in thousands) |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,638,638 |
|
|
|
22,989,502 |
|
|
|
22,581,188 |
|
|
|
22,955,655 |
|
Weighted-average effect of assumed
conversion of stock options and warrants |
|
|
262,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding |
|
|
22,901,590 |
|
|
|
22,989,502 |
|
|
|
23,007,067 |
|
|
|
22,955,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
The following table indicates the number of potentially dilutive securities as of the end of
each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Common stock options |
|
|
3,638,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,018,917 |
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
76,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,714,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,057,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties
The Company currently depends on one supplier for a number of components necessary for its
products, including ballasts and lamps. If the supply of these components were to be disrupted or
terminated, or if this supplier were unable to supply the quantities of components required, the
Company may have short-term difficulty in locating alternative suppliers at required volumes.
Purchases from this supplier accounted for 44% and 15% of total cost of revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 and 34% and 13% of total cost of revenue for the six
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011.
12
The Company currently purchases a majority of its solar panels from one supplier for its sales
of solar generating systems through its Orion Engineered Systems Division. The Company does have
alternative vendor sources for its sale of PV solar generating systems. Purchases from this
supplier accounted for 19% and 30% of total cost of revenue for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 2011 and 15% and 32% of total cost of revenue for the six months ended September 30,
2010 and 2011.
For the three and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, no customer accounted for more
than 10% of revenue.
As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, one customer accounted for 16% and 11% of
accounts receivable, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Disclosures about the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). ASU
2010-20 requires further disaggregated disclosures that improve financial statement users
understanding of (1) the nature of an entitys credit risk associated with its financing
receivables and (2) the entitys assessment of that risk in estimating its allowance for credit
losses as well as changes in the allowance and the reasons for those changes. The new and amended
disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-20 did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860):
Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (ASU 2011-03). ASU No. 2011-03
affects all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and
obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The
amendments in ASU 2011-03 remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to
the transferors ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially all of the
agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. ASU 2011-03 also eliminates the
requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially
all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets. The guidance is effective for the
Companys reporting period ended March 31, 2012. ASU 2011-03 is required to be applied
prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after
January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2011-03 will have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments
to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged
guidance of the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) on fair value measurements. The collective
efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common
requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements,
including a consistent meaning of the term fair value. The Boards have concluded the common
requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and
disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in
this ASU are required to be applied prospectively, and are effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2011-04
will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220):
Presentation of Comprehensive Income, (ASU 2011-05) which amends current comprehensive income
guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. Instead, the Company must
report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which
contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but
consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies during the interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of
ASU 2011-05 will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated statements as it only
requires a change in the format of the current presentation.
NOTE C RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, the Company recorded revenue of
$11,000 and $0.3 million, respectively, for products and services sold to an entity for which a
then current director of the Company was formerly the executive chairman. During the same six month
periods, the Company purchased goods and services from the same entity in the amounts of none and
$4,700, respectively. The terms and conditions of such relationship are believed to be not
materially more favorable to the Company or the entity than could be obtained from an independent third party.
13
During the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, the Company purchased goods and
services from an entity of $19,000 and $23,000, respectively, for which a director of the Company
serves as a member of the board of directors. The terms and conditions of such relationship are
believed to be not materially more favorable to the Company or the entity than could be obtained
from an independent third party.
NOTE D DEBT
Long-term debt as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Term note |
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
Customer equipment finance notes payable |
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
6,028 |
|
First mortgage note payable |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Debenture payable |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
9,281 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
|
$ |
6,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Debt Arrangements
In September 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(JP Morgan) that provided the Company with $5.0 million immediately available to fund completed
customer contracts under the Companys OTA finance program and an additional $5.0 million upon the
Companys achievement of meeting a trailing 12-month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization (EBITDA) target of $8.0 million. The Company has one-year from the date of the
commitment to borrow under the credit agreement. In September 2011, the Company borrowed $1.8 million.
The borrowing is collateralized by the OTA-related equipment and the expected future monthly
payments under the supporting 27 individual OTA customer contracts. The current borrowing under the
credit agreement bears interest at LIBOR plus 4% and matures in September 2016. The credit
agreement includes certain financial covenants, including funded debt to EBITDA and debt service
coverage ratios. The Company was in compliance with all covenants in the credit agreement as of
September 30, 2011.
Revolving Credit Agreement
On June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (Credit Agreement) with JP
Morgan. The Credit Agreement replaced the former credit agreement with a different bank.
The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) that matures
on June 30, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are limited to (i) $15.0 million or (ii)
during periods in which the outstanding principal balance of outstanding loans under the Credit
Facility is greater than $5.0 million, the lesser of (A) $15.0 million or (B) the sum of 75% of the
outstanding principal balance of certain accounts receivable of the Company and 45% of certain
inventory of the Company. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including
minimum unencumbered liquidity requirements and requirements that the Company maintain a total
liabilities to tangible net worth ratio not to exceed 0.50 to 1.00 as of the last day of any fiscal
quarter. The Credit Agreement also contains certain restrictions on the ability of the Company to
make capital or lease expenditures over prescribed limits, incur additional indebtedness,
consolidate or merge, guarantee obligations of third parties, make loans or advances, declare or
pay any dividend or distribution on its stock, redeem or repurchase shares of its stock or pledge
assets. The Company also may cause JP Morgan to issue letters of credit for the Companys account
in the aggregate principal amount of up to $2.0 million, with the dollar amount of each issued
letter of credit counting against the overall limit on borrowings under the Credit Facility. As of
September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $1.7 million, primarily
for securing collateral requirements under equipment operating leases. In fiscal 2011, the Company
incurred $57,000 of total deferred financing costs related to the Credit Agreement which is being
amortized over the two-year term of the Credit Agreement. There were no borrowings by the Company
under the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2011 or September 30, 2011. The Company was in
compliance with all of its covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2011.
14
The Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien security interest in the Companys accounts
receivable, inventory and general intangibles, and a second lien priority in the Companys
equipment and fixtures. All OTAs, PPAs, leases, supply agreements and/or similar agreements
relating to solar PV and wind turbine systems or facilities, as well as all accounts receivable and
assets of the Company related to the foregoing, are excluded from these liens.
The Company must pay a fee of 0.25% on the average daily unused amount of the Credit Facility
and a fee of 2.00% on the daily average face amount of undrawn issued letters of credit. The fee on
unused amounts is waived if the Company or its affiliates maintain funds on deposit with JP Morgan
or its affiliates above a specified amount. The deposit threshold requirement was met as of
September 30, 2011.
NOTE E INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision for the six months ended September 30, 2011 was determined by
applying an estimated annual effective tax rate of 40.3% to income before taxes. The estimated
effective income tax rate was determined by applying statutory tax rates to pretax income adjusted
for certain permanent book to tax differences and tax credits.
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income
tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Statutory federal tax rate |
|
|
(34.0 |
)% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State taxes, net |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(44.6 |
)% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Federal tax credit |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
State tax credit |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Permanent items |
|
|
(11.7 |
)% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Change in valuation reserve |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other, net |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
(100.2 |
)% |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is eligible for tax benefits associated with the excess of the tax deduction
available for exercises of non-qualified stock options, or NQSOs, over the amount recorded at
grant. The amount of the benefit is based on the ultimate deduction reflected in the applicable
income tax return. Benefits of $0.5 million were recorded in fiscal 2011 as a reduction in taxes
payable and a credit to additional paid in capital based on the amount that was utilized during the
year. Benefits of $0.3 million were recorded for the six months ended September 30, 2011.
During fiscal 2011, the Company converted almost all of its existing incentive
stock options, or ISOs, to NQSOs. This conversion was applied retrospectively, allowing the Company
to benefit by reducing $0.6 million of income tax expense during fiscal 2011 related to
non-deductible ISO stock compensation expense that was previously deferred for income tax purposes.
The conversion will greatly reduce the impact of stock-based compensation expense on the effective
tax rate in the table above. Since July 30, 2008, all stock option grants have been issued as
NQSOs.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $7.6 million, of which $4.5 million are associated with the exercise
of NQSOs that have not yet been recognized by the Company in its financial statements. The Company
also has state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.6 million, of which $2.5
million are associated with the exercise of NQSOs. The Company also has federal tax credit
carryforwards of approximately $1.0 million and state tax credits of $0.6 million. A full valuation
allowance has been set up for the state tax credits due to the state apportioned income and the
potential expiration of the state tax credits due to the carry forward period. These federal and
state net operating losses and credit carryforwards are available, subject to the discussion in the
following paragraph, to offset future taxable income and, if not utilized, will begin to expire in
varying amounts between 2014 2030.
In 2007, the Companys past issuances and transfers of stock caused an ownership change. As a
result, the Companys ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards, attributable to the
period prior to such ownership change, to offset taxable income will be subject to limitations in a
particular year, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability for the Company.
The Company does not believe the ownership change affects the use of the full amount of the net
operating loss carryforwards.
15
As of September 30, 2011, the Companys U.S. federal income tax returns for tax years 2009 to
2011 remain subject to examination. The Company has various federal income tax return positions in
the process of examination for 2009 and 2010. The Company currently believes that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on
its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Uncertain tax positions
As of September 30, 2011, the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits was approximately
$0.4 million, all of which would reduce the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. The
Company does not expect this amount to change in the next 12 months as none of the issues are
currently under examination, the statutes of limitations do not expire within the period, and the
Company is not aware of any pending litigation. Due to the existence of net operating loss and
credit carryforwards, all years since 2002 are open to examination by tax authorities.
The Company has classified the amounts recorded for uncertain tax benefits in the balance
sheet as other liabilities (non-current) to the extent that payment is not anticipated within one
year. The Company recognizes penalties and interest related to uncertain tax liabilities in income
tax expense. Penalties and interest are immaterial as of the date of adoption and are included in
the unrecognized tax benefits. For the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, the Company
had the following unrecognized tax benefit activity (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
Decreases relating to settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current period positions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of end of period |
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE F COMMITMENTS
Operating Leases and Purchase Commitments
The Company leases vehicles and equipment under operating leases. Rent expense under operating
leases was $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011;
and $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011. The Company
enters into non-cancellable purchase commitments for certain inventory items in order to secure
better pricing and ensure materials on hand, as well as for capital expenditures. As of September
30, 2011, the Company had entered into $10.1 million of purchase commitments related to fiscal
2012, including $1.7 million for operating lease commitments and $8.4 million for inventory
purchase commitments.
NOTE G SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Shareholder Rights Plan
On January 7, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan and
declared a dividend distribution of one common share purchase right (a Right) for each
outstanding share of the Companys common stock. The issuance date for the distribution of the
Rights was February 15, 2009 to shareholders of record on February 1, 2009. Each Right entitles the
registered holder to purchase from the Company one share of the Companys common stock at a price
of $30.00 per share, subject to adjustment (the Purchase Price).
The Rights will not be exercisable (and will be transferable only with the Companys common
stock) until a Distribution Date occurs (or the Rights are earlier redeemed or expire). A
Distribution Date generally will occur on the earlier of a public announcement that a person or
group of affiliated or associated persons (an Acquiring Person) has acquired beneficial ownership
of 20% or more of the Companys outstanding common stock (a Shares Acquisition Date) or 10
business days after the commencement of, or the announcement of an intention to make, a tender
offer or exchange offer that would result in any such person or group of persons acquiring such
beneficial ownership.
16
If a person becomes an Acquiring Person, holders of Rights (except as otherwise provided in
the shareholder rights plan) will have the right to receive that number of shares of the Companys
common stock having a market value of two times the then-current
Purchase Price, and all Rights beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person, or by certain
related parties or transferees, will be null and void. If, after a Shares Acquisition Date, the
Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction or 50% or more of its
consolidated assets or earning power are sold, proper provision will be made so that each holder of
a Right (except as otherwise provided in the shareholder rights plan) will thereafter have the
right to receive that number of shares of the acquiring companys common stock which at the time of
such transaction will have a market value of two times the then-current Purchase Price.
Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as a shareholder
of the Company. At any time prior to a person becoming an Acquiring Person, the Board of
Directors of the Company may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.001 per
Right. Unless they are extended or earlier redeemed or exchanged, the Rights will expire on January
7, 2019.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In August 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved a non-compensatory employee stock
purchase plan, or ESPP. The ESPP authorizes 2,500,000 shares to be issued from treasury or
authorized shares to satisfy employee share purchases under the ESPP. All full-time employees of
the Company are eligible to be granted a non-transferable purchase right each calendar quarter to
purchase directly from the Company up to $20,000 of the Companys common stock at a purchase price
equal to 100% of the closing sale price of the Companys common stock on the NYSE Amex exchange on
the last trading day of each quarter. The ESPP allows for employee loans from the Company, except
for Section 16 officers, limited to 20% of an individuals annual income and no more than $250,000
outstanding at any one time. Interest on the loans is charged at the 10-year loan IRS rate and is
payable at the end of each calendar year or upon loan maturity. The loans are secured by a pledge
of any and all the Companys shares purchased by the participant under the ESPP and the Company has
full recourse against the employee, including offset against compensation payable. The Company had
the following shares issued from treasury during fiscal 2011 and for the six months ended September
30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under ESPP |
|
|
Closing Market |
|
|
Under Loan |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
Repayment of |
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Program |
|
|
Loans Issued |
|
|
Loans |
|
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
65,776 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
|
58,655 |
|
|
$ |
196,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,685 |
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
|
|
33,800 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
Quarter Ended September
30, 2011 |
|
|
16,753 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
29,850 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
92,317 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
78,520 |
|
|
$ |
259,750 |
|
|
$ |
15,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans issued to employees are reflected on the Companys balance sheet as a contra-equity account.
Share Repurchase Program
In October 2011, the Companys Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program
authorizing the Company to repurchase in aggregate up to a maximum of $1.0 million of the Companys
outstanding common stock.
NOTE H STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company grants stock options under its 2003 Stock Option and 2004 Stock and Incentive
Awards Plans (the Plans). Under the terms of the Plans, the Company has reserved 12,000,000 shares
for issuance to key employees, consultants and directors. The Companys board of directors approved
an increase to the number of shares available under the 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan of
1,500,000 shares, and such share increase was approved by the Companys shareholders at the 2010
annual shareholders meeting and such shares are included above, other than as described below. In
addition, the Companys board of directors subsequently approved an additional increase to the
number of shares available under the Plan by 1,000,000 shares contingent upon the Companys
achievement of at least 100% of each of the targeted financial metrics under its bonus program for
fiscal 2012. The contingent share increase was approved by the Companys shareholders at the 2011
annual shareholders meeting and such shares are not included in the total above. The options
generally vest and become exercisable ratably between one month and five years although longer
vesting periods have been used in certain circumstances. Exercisability of the options granted to
employees are contingent on the employees continued employment and non-vested options are subject
to forfeiture if employment terminates for any reason. Options under the Plans have a maximum life
of 10 years. In the past, the Company has granted both ISOs and NQSOs, although in July 2008, the
Company adopted a policy of thereafter only granting NQSOs. Restricted stock awards have no vesting
period and have been issued to certain non-employee directors in lieu of cash compensation pursuant
to elections made under the Companys non-employee director compensation program. The Plans also
provide to certain employees accelerated vesting in the event of certain changes of control of the
Company as well as under other special circumstances.
17
In fiscal 2011, the Company converted all of its existing ISO awards to NQSO awards. No
consideration was given to the employees for their voluntary conversion of ISO awards.
The Company granted accelerated vesting stock options in May 2011 under its 2004 Stock and
Incentive Awards to provide an opportunity for its employees to earn long-term
equity incentive awards based on the Companys financial performance for fiscal 2012. An aggregate
of 459,041 stock options were granted on the third business day following the Companys public
release of its fiscal 2011 results at an exercise price per share of $4.19, which was the closing
sale price of the Companys Common Stock on that date. The stock options will only vest, however,
if the optionee remains employed and the Company is successful in achieving at least 100% of the
target levels for each of the Companys three financial metric targets for fiscal 2012, and if the
Companys stock price equals or exceeds $5.00 per share for at least 20 trading days during any
90-day period during the options ten-year term.
For the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted 7,614 and
10,896 shares under the 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan to certain non-employee directors who
elected to receive stock awards in lieu of cash compensation. The shares were valued at $3.12 per
share and $4.19 per share, the closing market prices as of the grant dates.
The following amounts of stock-based compensation were recorded (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, compensation cost related to non-vested common stock-based
compensation, excluding performance stock option awards amounted to $3.8 million over a remaining
weighted average expected term of 6.9 years.
The following table summarizes information with respect to the Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Available for |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
value |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,577,676 |
|
|
|
3,658,768 |
|
|
$ |
3.83 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted stock options |
|
|
(986,356 |
) |
|
|
986,356 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted shares |
|
|
(10,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
546,794 |
|
|
|
(546,794 |
) |
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,413 |
) |
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,127,218 |
|
|
|
4,018,917 |
|
|
$ |
3.97 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
$ |
444,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,723,065 |
|
|
$ |
3.97 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
|
$ |
316,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, which is
calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and the
fair value of the Companys closing common stock price of $2.65 as of September 30, 2011.
A summary of the status of the Companys outstanding non-vested stock options as of September
30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,832,167 |
|
Granted |
|
|
986,356 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(209,881 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(312,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,295,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has previously issued warrants in connection with various private placement stock
offerings and services rendered. The warrants granted the holder the option to purchase common
stock at specified prices for a specified period of time. No warrants were issued in fiscal 2011 or
during the six months ended September 30, 2011.
18
Outstanding warrants are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of outstanding warrants at September 30, 2011 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Warrants |
|
|
Expiration |
|
$2.25 |
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
Fiscal 2015 |
NOTE I SEGMENT DATA
During the fiscal 2011 third quarter, certain activity of the Orion Engineered Systems
Division exceeded the quantitative thresholds required for segment reporting. As such,
descriptions of the Companys segments and their summary financial information are summarized
below.
Energy Management
The Energy Management Division develops, manufactures and sells commercial high intensity
fluorescent, or HIF, lighting systems and energy management systems.
Engineered Systems
The Engineered Systems Division sells and integrates alternative renewable energy systems,
such as solar and wind, and provides technical services for the Companys sale of HIF lighting
systems and energy management systems.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other is comprised of selling, general and administrative expenses not directly
allocated to the Companys segments and adjustments to reconcile to consolidated results, which
primarily include intercompany eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Management |
|
$ |
14,371 |
|
|
$ |
16,686 |
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
Engineered Systems |
|
|
1,482 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,853 |
|
|
$ |
19,260 |
|
|
$ |
(1,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Management |
|
$ |
29,769 |
|
|
$ |
33,128 |
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
$ |
2,228 |
|
Engineered Systems |
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,830 |
|
|
$ |
42,034 |
|
|
$ |
(2,643 |
) |
|
$ |
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Deferred Revenue |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Management |
|
$ |
67,449 |
|
|
$ |
63,574 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
Engineered Systems |
|
|
14,405 |
|
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
33,136 |
|
|
|
42,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,990 |
|
|
$ |
120,574 |
|
|
$ |
2,039 |
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys revenue and long-lived assets outside the United States are insignificant.
20
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in the Form 10-Q. It should also be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2011.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q about our expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, prospects, financial condition, assumptions or future events or performance are not
historical facts and are forward-looking statements as that term is defined under the federal
securities laws. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or
phrases such as believe, anticipate, should, intend, plan, will, expects,
estimates, projects, positioned, strategy, outlook and similar words. You should read the
statements that contain these types of words carefully. Such forward-looking statements are subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from what is expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. There may be
events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over which we have no control.
Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item
1A. Risk Factors in our fiscal 2011 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2011 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We urge you not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as the date of this report. We do not undertake
any obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect
events or uncertainties after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
We design, manufacture, market and implement energy management systems consisting primarily of
high-performance, energy efficient lighting systems, controls and related services and market and
implement renewable energy systems consisting primarily of solar generating photovoltaic, or PV,
systems and wind turbines. We operate in two business segments, which we refer to as our Energy
Management Division and our Engineered Systems Division.
We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of high intensity
fluorescent, or HIF, lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers.
We typically sell our HIF lighting systems in replacement of our customers existing high intensity
discharge, or HID, fixtures. We call this replacement process a retrofit. We frequently engage
our customers existing electrical contractor to provide installation and project management
services. We also sell our HIF lighting systems on a wholesale basis, principally to electrical
contractors and value-added resellers to sell to their own customer bases.
We have sold and installed more than 2,176,000 of our HIF lighting systems in over 7,368
facilities from December 1, 2001 through September 30, 2011. We have sold our products to 137
Fortune 500 companies, many of which have installed our HIF lighting systems in multiple
facilities. Our top direct customers by revenue in fiscal 2011 included Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.,
U.S. Foodservice, SYSCO Corp., Ball Corporation, MillerCoors and Pepsico, Inc. and its affiliates.
Our fiscal year ends on March 31. We call our prior fiscal year which ended on March 31, 2011,
fiscal 2011. We call our current fiscal year, which will end on March 31, 2012, fiscal 2012.
Our fiscal first quarter ended on June 30, our fiscal second quarter ended on September 30, our
fiscal third quarter ends on December 31 and our fiscal fourth quarter ends on March 31.
Because of the recessed state of the global economy, especially as it impacted capital
equipment manufacturers, our results for the first half of fiscal 2011 were impacted by lengthened
customer sales cycles and sluggish customer capital spending. During the second half of fiscal 2011
and the first half of fiscal 2012, capital equipment purchases were slightly improved and we
continue to remain optimistic regarding customer behaviors for the remainder of fiscal year 2012. To address these
difficult economic conditions, we implemented $3.2 million of annualized cost reductions during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. These cost containment initiatives included reductions related to
headcount, work hours and discretionary spending and began to show results in the second half of
fiscal 2010 and the first half of fiscal 2011. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we
identified an additional $1 million of annualized cost reductions related to decreased product
costs, improved manufacturing efficiencies and reduced operating expenses. We realized these cost
reductions beginning during the fiscal 2011 third quarter through reduction in general and
administrative expenses and improved product margins for our HIF lighting systems.
21
Despite these recent economic challenges, we remain optimistic about our near-term and
long-term financial performance. Our near-term optimism is based upon our record level of revenue
in fiscal 2011 along with our return to profitability, our record level of order backlog heading
into the back half of fiscal 2012, the increasing volume of unit sales in the first half of fiscal
2012 of our new products, specifically our exterior HIF fixtures, InteLite wireless dynamic
controls, and our Apollo light pipes, and our cost reduction plans completed during fiscal 2011.
Our long-term optimism is based upon the considerable size of the existing market opportunity for
lighting retrofits, the continued development of our new products and product enhancements, the
opportunity for additional revenue from sales of renewable technologies through our Orion
Engineered Systems Division, the opportunity for our participation in the replacement part
aftermarket and the increasing national recognition of the importance of environmental stewardship,
including legislation in the State of Wisconsin passed in fiscal 2011 that recognized our solar
Apollo light pipe as a renewable product offering and qualified it for incentives currently offered
to other renewable technologies.
In August 2009, we created Orion Engineered Systems, a new operating division which has been
offering our customers additional alternative renewable energy systems. In fiscal 2010, we sold and
installed three solar PV electricity generating projects, completing our test analysis on two of
the three in the fiscal 2010 third quarter, and executed our first cash sale and our first power
purchase agreement, or PPA, as a result of the successful testing of these systems. We completed
the installation and customer acceptance of the third system, a cash sale, during our fiscal 2011
first quarter. During our fiscal 2011 second quarter, we received an $8.2 million cash order for a
solar PV generating system for which we recognized $6.6 million of revenue in fiscal 2011.
During our fiscal 2011 third quarter, revenue from our Orion Engineered Systems Division
exceeded the quantitative threshold for generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, segment
accounting. We now report our Energy Management and Engineered Systems Divisions as separate
segments. Our Energy Management Division develops, manufactures and sells commercial high intensity
fluorescent, or HIF, lighting systems and energy management systems. Our Engineered Systems
Division sells and integrates alternative renewable energy systems and provides technical services
for the Companys sale of HIF lighting systems and energy management systems.
In response to the constraints on our customers capital spending budgets, we have more
aggressively promoted the advantages to our customers of purchasing our energy management systems
through our Orion Throughput Agreement, or OTA, finance program. Our OTA financing program provides
for our customers purchase of our energy management systems without an up-front capital outlay.
The OTA contracts under this sales-type financing are either structured with a fixed term,
typically 60 months, and a bargain purchase option at the end of the term, or are one year in
duration and, at the completion of the initial one-year term, provide for (i) one to four automatic
one-year renewals at agreed upon pricing; (ii) an early buyout for cash; or (iii) the return of the
equipment at the customers expense. The revenue that we are entitled to receive from the sale of
our energy management systems under our OTA financing program is fixed and is based on the cost of
the energy management system and applicable profit margin. Our revenue from agreements entered into
under this program is not dependent upon our customers actual energy savings. Upon completion of
the installation, we may choose to sell the future cash flows and residual rights to the equipment
on a non-recourse basis to an unrelated third party finance company in exchange for cash and future
payments. We expect that the number of customers who choose to purchase our systems by using our
OTA financing program will continue to increase in future periods. Additionally, we have provided a
financing program to our alternative renewable energy system customers called a solar power
purchase agreement, or PPA, as an alternative to purchasing our systems for cash. The PPA is a
supply side agreement for the generation of electricity and subsequent sale to the end user. We do
not intend to use our own cash balances to fund future PPA Opportunities. We have secured one external funding source to fund PPAs and continue to look for additional external sources of funding for PPAs on behalf of our customers.
Revenue and Expense Components
Revenue. We sell our energy management products and services directly to commercial and
industrial customers, and indirectly to end users through wholesale sales to electrical contractors
and value-added resellers. We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from
sales of HIF lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers. While
our services include comprehensive site assessment, site field verification, utility incentive and
government subsidy management, engineering design, project management, installation and recycling
in connection with our retrofit installations, we separately recognize service revenue only for our
installation and recycling services. Our service revenues are recognized when services are complete
and customer acceptance has been received. In fiscal 2011, we increased our efforts to expand our
value-added reseller channels, including through developing a partner standard operating procedural
kit, providing our partners with product marketing materials and providing training to channel
partners on our sales methodologies. These wholesale channels accounted for approximately 53% of
our total revenue in fiscal 2011, not taking into consideration our renewable technologies revenue
generated through our Orion Engineered Systems Division. During the fiscal 2012 first half,
wholesale revenues accounted for approximately 61% of our total revenue, not taking into
consideration our renewable technologies revenue generated through our Orion Engineered
Systems Division, compared to 53% for the first half of fiscal 2011. We are changing the manner in which we sell our solar PV systems. Instead of reselling the solar PV equipment
obtained from a solar PV equipment manufacturer, we are encouraging our customers to purchase their solar PV systems
directly from the manufacturer, while we provide the value-added installation and integration services. This change in
approach is expected to result in reduced revenue from solar orders, but is expected to result in improved gross
margins as discussed below.
22
Additionally, we offer our OTA sales-type financing program under which we finance the
customers purchase of our energy management systems. We recognize revenue from OTA contracts at
the net present value of the future cash flows at the completion date of the installation of the
energy management systems and the customers acknowledgement that the system is operating as
specified.
In fiscal 2011, we recognized $10.7 million of revenue from 127 completed OTA contracts. For
the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $3.6 million of revenue from 29 completed
contracts. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $6.5 million of revenue from
82 completed contracts. In the future, we expect an increase in the volume of OTA contracts as our
customers take advantage of the value proposition without incurring any up-front capital cost.
Our PPA financing program provides for our customers purchase of electricity from our
renewable energy generating assets without an upfront capital outlay. Our PPA is a longer-term
contract, typically in excess of 10 years, in which we receive monthly payments over the life of
the contract. This program creates an ongoing recurring revenue stream, but reduces near-term
revenue as the payments are recognized as revenue on a monthly basis over the life of the contract
versus upfront upon product shipment or project completion. In fiscal 2011, we recognized $0.4
million of revenue from completed PPAs. In the first half of fiscal 2012, we recognized $0.4
million of revenue from completed PPAs. As of September 30, 2011, we had signed one customer to two
separate PPAs representing future potential discounted revenue streams of $3.5 million. We discount
the future revenue from PPAs due to the long-term nature of the contracts, typically in excess of
10 years. The timing of expected future discounted GAAP revenue recognition and the resulting
operating cash inflows from PPAs, assuming the systems perform as designed, was as follows as of
September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
|
646 |
|
Fiscal 2014 |
|
|
536 |
|
Fiscal 2015 |
|
|
426 |
|
Fiscal 2016 |
|
|
425 |
|
Beyond |
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expected future discounted revenue from PPAs |
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other than for OTA and PPA revenue, we recognize revenue on product only sales at the time of
shipment. For projects consisting of multiple elements of revenue, such as a combination of product
sales and services, we recognize revenue by allocating the total contract revenue to each element
based on their relative selling prices. We determine the selling price of products based upon the
price charged when these products are sold separately. For services, we determine the selling price
based upon managements best estimate giving consideration to pricing practices, margin objectives,
competition, scope and size of individual projects, geographies in which we offer our products and
services, and internal costs. We recognize revenue at the time of product shipment on product sales
and on services completed prior to product shipment. We recognize revenue associated with services
provided after product shipment, based on their relative selling price, when the services are
completed and customer acceptance has been received. When other significant obligations or
acceptance terms remain after products are delivered, revenue is recognized only after such
obligations are fulfilled or acceptance by the customer has occurred.
Our dependence on individual key customers can vary from period to period as a result of the
significant size of some of our retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects. Our top 10 customers
accounted for approximately 38% and 28% of our total revenue for the first half of fiscal 2012 and
fiscal 2011, respectively. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue in the
first half of fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011. To the extent that large retrofit and roll-out projects
become a greater component of our total revenue, we may experience more customer concentration in
given periods. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales volume to, any of our significant
customers could have a material adverse effect on our total revenue in any given period and may
result in significant annual and quarterly revenue variations.
Our level of total revenue for any given period is dependent upon a number of factors,
including (i) the demand for our products and systems, including our OTA and PPA programs, and any
new products, applications and service that we may introduce through our Orion Engineered Systems
Division; (ii) changes in capital investment levels by our customers and prospects, (iii) the number
and timing of large retrofit and multi-facility retrofit, or roll-out, projects; (iv) the level
of our wholesale sales; (v) our ability to realize revenue from our services; (vi) market conditions; (vii) our execution of our sales process; (viii) our ability to compete in a highly
competitive market and our ability to respond successfully to market competition; (ix) the
selling price of our products and services; and (x) customer sales and budget cycles. As a result, our total revenue
may be subject to quarterly variations and our total revenue for any particular fiscal quarter may
not be indicative of future results.
23
Backlog. We define backlog as the total contractual value of all firm orders received for our
lighting and solar products and services where delivery of product or completion of services has not yet
occurred as of the end of any particular reporting period. Such orders must be evidenced by a
signed proposal acceptance or purchase order from the customer. Our backlog does not include PPAs
or national contracts that have been negotiated, but under which we have not yet received a
purchase order for the specific location. As of September 30, 2011, we had a backlog of firm
purchase orders of approximately $23.6 million, which included $16.5 million of solar PV orders,
compared to $11.6 million as of June 30, 2011, which included $4.2 million of solar PV orders. We
generally expect this level of firm purchase order backlog related to HIF lighting systems to be
converted into revenue within the following quarter and our firm purchase order backlog related to
solar PV systems to be recognized within the following two quarters. Principally as a result of the
continued lengthening of our customers purchasing decisions because of current recessed economic
conditions and related factors and the continued shortening of our installation cycles, a
comparison of backlog from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative
of actual revenue recognized in future periods.
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of revenue consists of costs for: (i) raw materials, including
sheet, coiled and specialty reflective aluminum; (ii) electrical components, including ballasts,
power supplies and lamps; (iii) wages and related personnel expenses, including stock-based
compensation charges, for our fabricating, coating, assembly, logistics and project installation
service organizations; (iv) manufacturing facilities, including depreciation on our manufacturing
facilities and equipment, taxes, insurance and utilities; (v) warranty expenses; (vi) installation
and integration; and (vii) shipping and handling. Our cost of aluminum can be subject to commodity
price fluctuations, which we attempt to mitigate with forward fixed-price, minimum quantity
purchase commitments with our suppliers. We also purchase many of our electrical components through
forward purchase contracts. We buy most of our specialty reflective aluminum from a single
supplier, and most of our ballast and lamp components from a single supplier, although we believe
we could obtain sufficient quantities of these raw materials and components on a price and quality
competitive basis from other suppliers if necessary. Purchases from our current primary supplier of
ballast and lamp components constituted 13% of our total cost of revenue for the first half of
fiscal 2012 and were 34% of our total cost of revenue for the first half of fiscal 2011. Our cost
of revenue from OTA projects is recorded upon customer acceptance and acknowledgement that the
system is operating as specified. Our production labor force is non-union and, as a result, our
production labor costs have been relatively stable. We have been expanding our network of qualified
third-party installers to realize efficiencies in the installation process.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit has been, and will continue to be, affected by the relative
levels of our total revenue and our total cost of revenue, and as a result, our gross profit may be
subject to quarterly variation. Our gross profit as a percentage of total revenue, or gross margin,
is affected by a number of factors, including: (i) our level of solar PV sales which generally have
substantially lower relative gross margins than our traditional energy management systems; (ii) our
mix of large retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects with national accounts; (iii) the level
of our wholesale and partner sales (which generally have historically resulted in lower relative
gross margins, but higher relative net margins, than our sales to direct customers); (iv) our
realization rate on our billable services; (v) our project pricing; (vi) our level of warranty
claims; (vii) our level of utilization of our manufacturing facilities and production equipment and
related absorption of our manufacturing overhead costs; (viii) our level of efficiencies in our
manufacturing operations; and (ix) our level of efficiencies from our subcontracted installation
service providers. We are changing the manner in which we sell our solar PV systems. Instead of reselling the solar PV equipment
obtained from a solar PV equipment manufacturer, we are encouraging our customers to purchase their solar PV systems
directly from the manufacturer, while we provide the value-added installation and integration services. This change in
approach is expected to result in increased solar PV gross margins.
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses consist of: (i) general and
administrative expenses; (ii) sales and marketing expenses; and (iii) research and development
expenses. Personnel related costs are our largest operating expense. In fiscal 2012, we are increasing personnel in our sales areas for telemarketing and direct sales employees as we believe
that future opportunities within our business remain strong.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and
related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges related to our executive,
finance, human resource, information technology and operations organizations; (ii) public company
costs, including investor relations, external audit and internal audit; (iii) occupancy expenses;
(iv) professional services fees; (v) technology related costs and amortization; (vi) bad debt and
asset impairment charges; and (vii) corporate-related travel.
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and related
personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges related to our sales and marketing
organization; (ii) internal and external sales commissions and bonuses; (iii) travel, lodging and
other out-of-pocket expenses associated with our selling efforts; (iv) marketing programs; (v)
pre-sales costs; and (vi) other related overhead.
24
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and related
personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges, related to our engineering
organization; (ii) payments to consultants; (iii) the design and development of new energy
management products and enhancements to our existing energy management system; (iv) quality
assurance and testing; and (v) other related overhead. We expense research and development costs as
incurred.
In fiscal 2011 and continuing in the first half of fiscal 2012, we invested in marketing
efforts to our direct end customers and to our channel partners through increasing advertising,
marketing collateral materials and participating in national industry and customer trade shows. We
expense all pre-sale costs incurred in connection with our sales process prior to obtaining a
purchase order. These pre-sale costs may reduce our net income in a given period prior to
recognizing any corresponding revenue. We also intend to continue investing in our research and
development of new and enhanced energy management products and services.
We recognize compensation expense for the fair value of our stock option awards granted over
their related vesting period. We recognized $0.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2012 and $0.6
million in the first half of fiscal 2011. As a result of prior option grants, we expect to
recognize an additional $3.8 million of stock-based compensation over a weighted average period of
approximately seven years, including $0.7 million in the last six months of fiscal 2012. These
charges have been, and will continue to be, allocated to cost of product revenue, general and
administrative expenses, sales and marketing expenses and research and development expenses based
on the departments in which the personnel receiving such awards have primary responsibility. A
substantial majority of these charges have been, and likely will continue to be, allocated to
general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense is comprised primarily of interest expense on
outstanding borrowings under long-term debt obligations, including the amortization of previously
incurred financing costs. We amortize deferred financing costs to interest expense over the life
of the related debt instrument, ranging from two to ten years.
Interest Income. We report interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents and short
term investments. We also report interest income earned from our financed OTA contracts.
Income Taxes. As of September 30, 2011, we had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $7.6 million for federal tax purposes and $4.6 million for state tax purposes.
Included in these loss carryforwards were $4.5 million for federal and $2.5 million for state tax
purposes of compensation expenses that were associated with the exercise of nonqualified stock
options. The benefit from our net operating losses created from these compensation expenses has not
yet been recognized in our financial statements and will be accounted for in our shareholders
equity as a credit to additional paid-in capital as the deduction reduces our income taxes payable.
We also had federal tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.0 million and state credit
carryforwards of approximately $0.6 million. A full valuation allowance has been set up for the
state tax credits. We believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of most
of these assets and we have reserved for an allowance due to our state apportioned income and the
potential expiration of the state tax credits due to the carryforward period. These federal and
state net operating losses and credit carryforwards are available, subject to the discussion in the
following paragraph, to offset future taxable income and, if not utilized, will begin to expire in
varying amounts between 2014 and 2030.
Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a companys stock, by value, over a
three-year period constitutes an ownership change for federal income tax purposes. An ownership
change may limit a companys ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to
the period prior to such change. In fiscal 2007 and prior to our IPO, past issuances and transfers
of stock caused an ownership change for certain tax purposes. When certain ownership changes occur,
tax laws require that a calculation be made to establish a limitation on the use of net operating
loss carryforwards created in periods prior to such ownership change. For fiscal year 2008,
utilization of our federal loss carryforwards was limited to $3.0 million. There was no limitation
that occurred for fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2011. For fiscal 2012, we do not anticipate a limitation
on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards.
25
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the line items of our consolidated statements of operations on
an absolute dollar basis and as a relative percentage of our total revenue for each applicable
period, together with the relative percentage change in such line item between applicable
comparable periods set forth below (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
15,086 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
$ |
18,718 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
$ |
30,844 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
$ |
40,397 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
Service revenue |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
(29.3 |
)% |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(17.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
15,853 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
19,260 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
42,034 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
|
12,059 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
27,063 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Cost of service revenue |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(23.3 |
)% |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
(21.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
12,441 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
28,179 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
% |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
Sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
7,504 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
)% |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
81.3 |
% |
|
|
(2,643 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
)% |
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
74.9 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
172.7 |
% |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
91.1 |
% |
Dividend and interest income |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
85.2 |
% |
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
)% |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
78.9 |
% |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
(2,525 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
)% |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(118.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
(8,050.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. Product revenue increased from $15.1 million for the fiscal 2011 second quarter
to $18.7 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, an increase of $3.6 million, or 24%. The
increase in product revenue was a result of increased sales of our HIF lighting systems and renewable energy systems. Service revenue decreased from $0.8 million for
the fiscal 2011 second quarter to $0.5 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, a decrease of
$0.3 million, or 38%. The decrease in service revenues was a result of the continued percentage
increase of our total revenues generated by our wholesale channels, where our services are not
provided. Total revenue from renewable energy systems was $2.0 million for the fiscal 2012 second
quarter compared to none for the fiscal 2011 second quarter. Product revenue increased from $30.8
million for the fiscal 2011 first half to $40.4 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, an increase
of $9.6 million, or 31%. Total revenue from renewable energy systems was $7.4 million for the
fiscal 2012 first half compared to $0.4 million for the fiscal 2011 first half, an increase of $7.0
million, or 1,750%. Service revenue decreased from $2.0 million for the fiscal 2011 first half to
$1.6 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 20%. The decrease in
service revenue was a result of the continued percentage increase of total revenue to our wholesale
channels where services are not provided.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin. Our cost of product revenue increased from $9.7 million for
the fiscal 2011 second quarter to $12.1 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, an increase of
$2.4 million, or 25%. Our cost of service revenue decreased from $0.5 million for the fiscal 2011
second quarter to $0.4 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, a decrease of $0.1 million, or
20%. Total gross margin was 35.4% for the fiscal 2011 second quarter and fiscal 2012 second
quarters, respectively. Total cost of product revenue increased from $20.1 million for the fiscal
2011 first half to $27.1 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, an increase of $7.0 million, or
35%. Our cost of service revenue decreased from $1.4 million for the fiscal 2011 first half to $1.1
million for the fiscal 2012 first half, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 21%. Total gross margin
decreased from 34.6% for the fiscal 2011 first half to 33.0% for the fiscal 2012 first half. For
the fiscal 2012 first half, our gross margin declined due to a higher mix of renewable product and
service revenues from our Orion Engineered Systems Division. Our gross margin on renewable revenues
was 14.7% during the fiscal 2012 first half. Gross margin from our HIF integrated systems revenue
for the fiscal 2012 first half was 36.9%.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses decreased from $3.0
million for the fiscal 2011 second quarter to $2.7 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, a
decrease of $0.3 million, or 10%. Our general and administrative expenses decreased from $5.9
million for the fiscal 2011 first half to $5.8 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, a decrease
of $0.1 million, or 2%. The decrease was a result of reduced headcounts in management and
information technologies offset by increased expenses for depreciation and software license costs
for our new enterprise resource planning, or ERP, system.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses increased from $3.3 million for the
fiscal 2011 second quarter to $3.7 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, an increase of $0.4
million, or 12%. Our sales and marketing expenses increased from $6.9 million for the fiscal 2011
first half to $7.5 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, an increase of $0.6 million, or 9%. The
increase was a result of increased costs for headcount additions to our direct sales force and for
our newly formed telemarketing department, higher commission expense on our increased revenue and
increased depreciation for our new customer relationship management, or CRM, system. Total sales
and marketing employee headcount was 79 and 93 at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2011,
respectively.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses of $0.6 million for the fiscal
2012 second quarter were similar to our research and development expenses for our fiscal 2011
second quarter. Our research and development expenses of $1.2 million for the fiscal 2012 first
half were similar to our research and development expenses for our fiscal 2011 first half. Expenses
incurred in the fiscal 2012 first half related to compensation costs for the development and
support of our new products, depreciation expenses for lab and research equipment and sample, and
testing costs related to our dynamic control devices and our light emitting diode, or LED, product
initiatives.
26
Interest Expense. Our interest expense increased from $55,000 for the fiscal 2011 second
quarter to $150,000 for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, an increase of $95,000, or 173%. Our interest expense increased from $0.1
million for the fiscal 2011 first half to $0.2 million for the fiscal 2012 first half, an increase
of $0.1 million or 100%. The increase in our interest expense was due to additional financings
completed during the second half of fiscal 2011 and the first half of fiscal 2012 for the purpose
of financing our OTA projects.
Interest Income. Interest income increased from $153,000 for the fiscal 2011 second quarter to
$214,000 for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, an increase of $61,000 or 40%. Interest income
increased from $0.2 million for the fiscal 2011 first half to $0.4 million for the fiscal 2012
first half, an increase of $0.2 million, or 100%. Interest income increased due to an increase in
the number and dollar amount of completed OTA contracts and the related interest income under the
financing terms.
Income Taxes. Our income tax benefit decreased from a benefit of $1.7 million for the fiscal
2011 second quarter to an income tax benefit of $0.1 million for the fiscal 2012 second quarter, a
decrease of $1.6 million, or 94%. Our income tax benefit decreased from a benefit of $2.5 million
for the fiscal 2011 first half to an income tax benefit of $0.2 million for the fiscal 2012 first
half, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 92%. Our effective income tax rate for the fiscal 2011 first
half was 100.2%, compared to 40.3% for the fiscal 2012 first half. The change in effective rate was
due to the conversion of our incentive stock options, or ISOs, to non-qualified stock options, or
NQSOs, completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, a decrease from the prior year for
non-deductible expenses and an increase in fiscal 2011 for the state valuation reserve. The
conversion of our ISOs to NQSOs eliminated the volatility in our effective tax rates at lower
pre-tax earnings levels and should result in an effective tax rate in the 40% range for future
periods.
Energy Management Segment
The
following table summarizes our Energy Management segment operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
14,371 |
|
|
$ |
16,686 |
|
|
$ |
29,769 |
|
|
$ |
33,128 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
$ |
2,228 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Energy Management segment revenue increased $2.3 million, or 16%, from $14.4 million for
the fiscal 2011 first quarter to $16.7 million for the fiscal 2012 first quarter. Energy Management
segment revenue increased $3.4 million, or 11%, from $29.8 million for the fiscal 2011 first half
to $33.1 million for the fiscal 2012 first half. The increase was due to increased sales of our HIF
lighting systems to our wholesale customers.
Energy Management segment operating income increased $0.1 million, or 8%, from $1.3 million
for the fiscal 2011 first quarter to $1.4 million for the fiscal 2012 first quarter. Energy
Management segment operating income increased $0.6 million, or 38%, from $1.6 million for the
fiscal 2011 first half to $2.2 million for the fiscal 2012 first half. The increase in operating
income was a result of additional revenue and improved gross margins on our HIF lighting systems.
Engineered Systems Segment
The
following table summarizes our Engineered Systems segment operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
|
$ |
2,574 |
|
|
$ |
3,061 |
|
|
$ |
8,906 |
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
$ |
( 449 |
) |
|
$ |
(841 |
) |
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
Operating margin |
|
|
(28.9 |
)% |
|
|
(17.4 |
)% |
|
|
(27.5 |
)% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
27
Engineered Systems segment revenue increased $1.1 million, or 73%, from $1.5 million for
the fiscal 2011 first quarter to $2.6 million for the fiscal 2012 first quarter. Engineered Systems
segment revenue increased $5.8 million, or 187%, from $3.1 million for the fiscal 2011 first half
to $8.9 million for the fiscal 2012 first half. The increase was due to increased sales of solar
renewable technologies. During the first half of fiscal 2011, our Engineered Systems segment
efforts were focused on continuing to build sales pipeline and determination of the market for
these renewable technologies within our customer base.
Engineered Systems segment operating loss of $0.4 million for the fiscal 2011 first quarter
was similar to Engineered Systems segment operating income for the fiscal 2012 first quarter.
Energy Management segment operating loss decreased $0.5 million, or 63%, from $0.8 million for the
fiscal 2011 first half to $0.4 million for the fiscal 2012 first half. The reduction in operating
loss was a result of the increased revenue volume and resulting contribution margin from sales of solar
renewable energy systems.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We had approximately $15.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $1.0 million in short-term
investments as of September 30, 2011, compared to $11.6 million and $1.0 million at March 31, 2011.
Our cash equivalents are invested in money market accounts with maturities of less than 90 days and
an average yield of 0.2%. Our short-term investment account consists of a bank certificate of
deposit in the amount of $1.0 million with an expiration date of December 2011 and a yield of
0.50%. Additionally, as of September 30, 2011, we had $13.3 million of borrowing availability under
our revolving credit agreement. We also had $3.2 million of availability on our recently completed
OTA credit agreement, which can be utilized for the sole purpose of funding customer OTA projects.
During the first half of fiscal 2012, we borrowed $4.6 million to finance our OTA projects. We have
now secured multiple debt sources for our OTA finance contracts and believe that our sources of OTA
funding are sufficient to meet near-term OTA finance program requirements. In October 2011, our
board of directors approved a $1.0 million share repurchase plan. We believe that our existing cash
and cash equivalents, our anticipated cash flows from operating activities and our borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility and our OTA credit facility will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months, dependent upon our growth opportunities
with our cash and finance customers.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 2010 and
2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(8,633 |
) |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(4,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(10,040 |
) |
|
$ |
3,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Related to Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities for the
fiscal 2012 first half was $1.9 million and consisted of net cash provided from changes in
operating assets and liabilities of $0.2 million and a net loss adjusted for non-cash expense items
of $1.7 million. Cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities consisted of a
decrease of $4.0 million in total accounts receivable due to customer payments received during the
quarter and a $2.6 million increase in deferred revenue due to customer deposit payments received.
Cash used from changes in operating assets and liabilities included a $3.3 million increase in
inventory for purchases of solar panel inventory and increases in our work-in-process and lighting
fixture inventories for orders that are expected to ship during the fiscal 2012 third quarter, a
$1.4 million increase in prepaid and other expenses related to deferred costs from projects still
in implementation and a $2.1 million decrease in accounts payable due to vendor payments.
Cash used in operating activities for the fiscal 2011 first half was $8.6 million and
consisted of net cash of $9.5 million used for changes in operating assets and liabilities offset
by a net loss adjusted for non-cash expense items of $0.9 million. Cash used for changes in
operating assets and liabilities consisted of an increase in accounts receivables due to the
increase of our OTA program and the long-term nature of the contracts and an increase of $7.7
million for inventory purchases, including $3.8 million for purchases of wireless control
inventories based upon our Phase 2 initiatives, a $1.9 million increase in solar panel inventories
in anticipation of the receipt of customer purchase orders and a $3.1 million increase in ballast
component inventories due to concerns over supply availability and component shortages. Cash
provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities included a $1.5 million increase in
accounts payable related to payment terms on inventory purchases and a $0.8 million increase in
deferred revenue related to an investment tax grant received for a solar asset owned under our
power purchase agreement, or PPA, finance program.
28
Cash Flows Related to Investing Activities. For the fiscal 2012 first half, cash used in
investing activities was $2.1 million. This included a net $2.0 million for capital improvements
related to our information technology systems, manufacturing and tooling improvements and facility
investments and $0.1 million for investment in patent activities.
For the fiscal 2011 first half, cash used in investing activities was $4.0 million. This
included $2.0 million for capital improvements related to our information technology systems,
renewable technologies, manufacturing and tooling improvements and facility investments, $1.6
million invested in equipment related to our PPA finance programs, $0.3 million for long-term
investments and $0.1 million for patent investments.
Cash Flows Related to Financing Activities. For the fiscal 2012 first half, cash flows
provided by financing activities were $4.2 million. This included $4.6 million in new debt
borrowings to fund OTAs, $0.3 million for excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation and
$0.1 million received from stock option and warrant exercises. Cash flows used in financing
activities included $0.7 million for repayment of long-term debt and $0.1 million for debt closing
costs.
For the fiscal 2011 first half, cash flows provided by financing activities was $2.6 million.
This included $2.7 million in new debt borrowings to fund OTA and capital projects and $0.3 million
received from stock option exercises. Cash flows used in financing activities included $0.3 million
for repayment of long-term debt and $0.1 million for costs related to our new credit agreement.
Working Capital
Our net working capital as of September 30, 2011 was $57.9 million, consisting of $76.4
million in current assets and $18.5 million in current liabilities. Our net working capital as of
March 31, 2011 was $56.9 million, consisting of $73.1 million in current assets and $16.2 million
in current liabilities. Our current accounts receivables decreased from fiscal 2011 year-end by
$6.0 million as a result of the collection of payments from customers. Our inventories increased
from our fiscal 2011 year-end by $3.3 million due to a $1.8 million increase in solar panel
inventories in anticipation of the receipt of customer purchase orders, a $0.7 million increase in
our work-in process inventories for product orders to be delivered in
our fiscal 2012 third quarter, a $0.1 million increase in raw materials and a $0.7 million increase in finished goods for
orders expected to ship in our fiscal 2012 back half.
During fiscal 2011, we increased our inventory levels of key electronic components,
specifically electronic ballasts, to avoid potential shortages and customer service issues as a
result of lengthening supply lead times and product availability issues. We continue to monitor
supply side concerns within the electronic component market and believe that our current inventory
levels are sufficient to protect us against the risk of being unable to deliver product as
specified by our customers requirements. Recently, we were made aware of concerns over shortages
of rare earth minerals used in the production of fluorescent lamps. We have increased our purchase
commitments related to these components to ensure that we will have product availability to meet
customer demands. We are continually monitoring supply side concerns through conversations with our
key vendors and currently believe that supply availability concerns appear to have moderated, but
have not diminished to the point where we anticipate reducing safety stock to the levels that
existed prior to the electrical components supply issues.
We generally attempt to maintain at least a three-month supply of on-hand inventory of
purchased components and raw materials to meet anticipated demand, as well as to reduce our risk of
unexpected raw material or component shortages or supply interruptions. Our accounts receivables,
inventory and payables may increase to the extent our revenue and order levels increase.
Indebtedness
Revolving Credit Agreement
On June 30, 2010, we entered into a new credit agreement (Credit Agreement) with JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan). The Credit Agreement replaced our former credit agreement.
The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) that matures
on June 30, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are limited to (i) $15.0 million or (ii)
during periods in which the outstanding principal balance of outstanding loans under the Credit
Facility is greater than $5.0 million, the lesser of (A) $15.0 million or (B) the sum of 75% of the
outstanding principal balance of certain accounts receivable of the Company and 45% of certain
inventory of the Company. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including
minimum unencumbered liquidity requirements and requirements that we maintain a total liabilities
to tangible net worth ratio not to exceed 0.50 to 1.00 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain restrictions on our ability to make capital or lease
expenditures over prescribed limits, incur additional indebtedness, consolidate or merge, guarantee
obligations of third parties, make loans or advances, declare or pay any dividend or distribution
on its
29
stock, redeem or repurchase shares of its stock or pledge assets. We also may cause JP
Morgan to issue letters of credit for the Companys account in the aggregate principal amount of up
to $2.0 million, with the dollar amount of each issued letter of credit counting against the
overall limit on borrowings under the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2011, we had had
outstanding letters of credit totaling $1.7 million, primarily for securing collateral requirements
under equipment operating leases. In fiscal 2011, we incurred $57,000 of total deferred financing
costs related to the Credit Agreement which is being amortized over the two-year term of the Credit
Agreement. We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2011 or
September 30, 2011. We were in compliance with all of its covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 30,
2011.
The Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien security interest in our accounts receivable,
inventory and general intangibles, and a second lien priority in our equipment and fixtures. All
OTAs, PPAs, leases, supply agreements and/or similar agreements relating to solar PV and wind
turbine systems or facilities, as well as all of our accounts receivable and assets related to the
foregoing, are excluded from these liens.
We must pay a fee of 0.25% on the average daily unused amount of the Credit Facility and a fee
of 2.00% on the daily average face amount of undrawn issued letters of credit. The fee on unused
amounts is waived if we or our affiliates maintain funds on deposit with JP Morgan or its
affiliates above a specified amount. We satisfied the deposit requirement to waive the
unused fee as of September 30, 2011.
OTA Credit Agreement
In
September 2011, we entered into a credit agreement with JP Morgan that provided us with $5.0 million immediately available to fund completed customer
contracts under our OTA finance program and an additional $5.0 million upon our achievement of
meeting a trailing 12-month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
target of $8.0 million. We have one-year from the date of the commitment to borrow under the credit
agreement. In September 2011, we borrowed $1.8 million. The borrowing is collateralized by the
OTA-related equipment and the expected future monthly payments under the supporting 27 individual
OTA customer contracts. The current borrowing under the credit agreement bears interest at LIBOR
plus 4% and matures in September 2016. The credit agreement
includes certain financial covenants, including funded debt to EBITDA and debt service coverage ratios. We were in compliance with all
covenants in the credit agreement as of September 30, 2011.
Capital Spending
Capital expenditures totaled $2.0 million during the fiscal 2012 first half due to investments
in information technologies and other tooling and equipment for new products, as well as cost
improvements in our manufacturing facility. We expect to incur a total of $1.0 to $1.4 million in
capital expenditures during the remainder of fiscal 2012, excluding capital to support our OTA
contracts. Our capital spending plans predominantly consist of further cost improvements in our
manufacturing facility, improvements to our building and headquarters, new product development and
investment in information technology systems. We consider the investment in our information
systems critical to our long-term success and our ability to ensure a strong control environment
over financial reporting and operations. We expect to finance these capital expenditures primarily
through our existing cash, equipment secured loans and leases, to the extent needed, long-term debt
financing, or by using our available capacity under our credit facility.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table is a summary of our long-term contractual obligations as of September 30,
2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Bank debt obligations |
|
$ |
9,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
$ |
4,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
Cash interest payments on debt |
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
8,499 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
Purchase order and cap-ex commitments (1) |
|
|
16,028 |
|
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,354 |
|
|
$ |
12,948 |
|
|
$ |
14,316 |
|
|
$ |
3,763 |
|
|
$ |
4,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects non-cancellable purchase order commitments in the amount of $16.0 million for certain
inventory items entered into in order to secure better pricing and ensure materials on hand. |
30
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
Our results from operations have not been, and we do not expect them to be, materially
affected by inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our consolidated financial
statements requires us to make certain estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and our related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We re-evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to revenue recognition,
inventory valuation, the collectability of receivables, stock-based compensation, warranty reserves
and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. A
summary of our critical accounting policies is set forth in the Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates section of our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. There
have been no material changes in any of our accounting policies since March 31, 2011.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a complete discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, refer to Note B in the
condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our exposure to market risk was discussed in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk section contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2011. There have been no material changes to such exposures since March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance as to the reliability of our published financial statements and other disclosures
included in this report. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, as of the end of the quarter ended
September 30, 2011 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based upon their evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future results, some of which are beyond our
control. In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the
risks and uncertainties that we believe are most important for you to consider are discussed in
Part I Item 1A under the heading Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2011, which we filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011. During the three months
ended September 30, 2011, there were no material changes to the risk factors that were disclosed in
Part I Item 1A under the heading Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2011.
31
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
Statistical Data
The following table presents certain statistical data, cumulative from December 1, 2001 through
September 30, 2011, regarding sales of our HIF lighting systems, total units sold (including HIF
lighting systems), customer kilowatt demand reduction, customer kilowatt hours saved, customer
electricity costs saved, indirect carbon dioxide emission reductions from customers energy
savings, and square footage we have retrofitted. The assumptions behind our calculations are
described in the footnotes to the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative From |
|
|
|
December 1, 2001 |
|
|
|
Through September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, unaudited) |
|
HIF lighting systems sold(1) |
|
|
2,176 |
|
Total units sold (including HIF lighting systems) |
|
|
2,904 |
|
Customer kilowatt demand reduction(2) |
|
|
679 |
|
Customer kilowatt hours saved(2)(3) |
|
|
17,970,668 |
|
Customer electricity costs saved(4) |
|
$ |
1,383,741 |
|
Indirect carbon dioxide emission reductions from customers energy savings (tons)(5) |
|
|
11,677 |
|
Square footage retrofitted(6) |
|
|
1,119,001 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HIF lighting systems includes all HIF units sold under the brand name Compact Modular and
its predecessor, Illuminator. |
|
(2) |
|
A substantial majority of our HIF lighting systems, which generally operate at approximately
224 watts per six-lamp fixture, are installed in replacement of HID fixtures, which generally
operate at approximately 465 watts per fixture in commercial and industrial applications. We
calculate that each six-lamp HIF lighting system we install in replacement of an HID fixture
generally reduces electricity consumption by approximately 241 watts (the difference between
465 watts and 224 watts). In retrofit projects where we replace fixtures other than HID
fixtures, or where we replace fixtures with products other than our HIF lighting systems
(which other products generally consist of products with lamps similar to those used in our
HIF systems, but with varying frames, ballasts or power packs), we generally achieve similar
wattage reductions (based on an analysis of the operating wattages of each of our fixtures
compared to the operating wattage of the fixtures they typically replace). We calculate the
amount of kilowatt demand reduction by multiplying (i) 0.241 kilowatts per six-lamp equivalent
unit we install by (ii) the number of units we have installed in the period presented,
including products other than our HIF lighting systems (or a total of approximately 2.9
million units). |
|
(3) |
|
We calculate the number of kilowatt hours saved on a cumulative basis by assuming the demand
(kW) reduction for each fixture and assuming that each such unit has averaged 7,500 annual
operating hours since its installation. |
|
(4) |
|
We calculate our customers electricity costs saved by multiplying the cumulative total
customer kilowatt hours saved indicated in the table by $0.077 per kilowatt hour. The national
average rate for 2010, which is the most current full year for which this information is
available, was $0.0988 per kilowatt hour according to the United States Energy Information
Administration. |
|
(5) |
|
We calculate this figure by multiplying (i) the estimated amount of carbon dioxide emissions
that result from the generation of one kilowatt hour of electricity (determined using the
Emissions and Generation Resource Integration Database, or EGrid, prepared by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency), by (ii) the number of customer kilowatt hours saved
as indicated in the table. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on 2.90 million total units sold, which contain a total of approximately 14.5 million
lamps. Each lamp illuminates approximately 75 square feet. The majority of our installed
fixtures contain six lamps and typically illuminate approximately 450 square feet. |
32
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
|
Taxonomy extension schema document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
|
Taxonomy extension calculation linkbase document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
|
Taxonomy extension label linkbase document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
|
Taxonomy extension presentation linkbase document |
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November
9, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Registrant
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Scott R. Jensen
|
|
|
|
Scott R. Jensen |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Signatory) |
|
34
Exhibit Index to Form 10-Q for the Period Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
|
Taxonomy extension schema document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
|
Taxonomy extension calculation linkbase document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
|
Taxonomy extension label linkbase document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
Taxonomy extension presentation linkbase document |
35