e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-21969
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-2725311 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD
|
|
21090 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(410) 865-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at May 30, 2008 |
common stock, $.01 par value
|
|
90,154,787 |
CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
NUMBER |
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the quarters and six months ended April 30, 2007
and April 30, 2008
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2008
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
60 |
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
173,212 |
|
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
$ |
319,494 |
|
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
Services |
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
39,134 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
193,527 |
|
|
|
242,199 |
|
|
|
358,628 |
|
|
|
469,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
91,319 |
|
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
166,298 |
|
|
|
187,428 |
|
Services |
|
|
20,378 |
|
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
36,872 |
|
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
111,697 |
|
|
|
114,603 |
|
|
|
203,170 |
|
|
|
225,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
81,830 |
|
|
|
127,596 |
|
|
|
155,458 |
|
|
|
244,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
44,628 |
|
|
|
61,495 |
|
|
|
80,072 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
30,182 |
|
|
|
38,591 |
|
|
|
55,057 |
|
|
|
72,199 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,707 |
|
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
|
|
39,278 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
|
8,760 |
|
|
|
12,590 |
|
|
|
15,230 |
|
Restructuring recoveries |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
|
79,092 |
|
|
|
108,629 |
|
|
|
149,940 |
|
|
|
206,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
18,967 |
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
37,386 |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
16,897 |
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
31,742 |
|
|
|
27,569 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,148 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(12,296 |
) |
|
|
(9,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
13,487 |
|
|
|
25,593 |
|
|
|
24,964 |
|
|
|
55,736 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per potential common share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
85,198 |
|
|
|
89,102 |
|
|
|
85,076 |
|
|
|
88,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding |
|
|
93,737 |
|
|
|
110,770 |
|
|
|
93,491 |
|
|
|
110,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
892,061 |
|
|
$ |
963,852 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
822,185 |
|
|
|
69,768 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
104,078 |
|
|
|
132,065 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
102,618 |
|
|
|
125,406 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
47,817 |
|
|
|
42,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,968,759 |
|
|
|
1,333,382 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
46,671 |
|
|
|
55,593 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
232,015 |
|
|
|
455,138 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
67,144 |
|
|
|
113,383 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
67,738 |
|
|
|
72,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,416,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,055,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
55,389 |
|
|
$ |
69,953 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
90,922 |
|
|
|
94,489 |
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,768 |
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
33,025 |
|
|
|
43,535 |
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
542,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
730,392 |
|
|
|
210,737 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
30,615 |
|
|
|
36,478 |
|
Long-term restructuring liabilities |
|
|
3,662 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
7,827 |
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,566,119 |
|
|
|
1,058,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock par value $0.01; 20,000,000
shares authorized; zero shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock par value $0.01; 140,000,000
and 290,000,000 shares authorized; 86,752,069
and 90,129,543 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,519,741 |
|
|
|
5,612,310 |
|
Changes in unrealized gains on investments, net |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
|
|
410 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,669,212 |
) |
|
|
(4,616,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
850,154 |
|
|
|
997,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,416,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,055,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on marketable securities |
|
|
(3,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
8,567 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
8,937 |
|
|
|
15,752 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
17,165 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
10,540 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
7,083 |
|
Other |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(38,323 |
) |
|
|
(25,990 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(19,090 |
) |
|
|
(20,456 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(12,173 |
) |
|
|
5,816 |
|
Accounts payable and accruals |
|
|
17,741 |
|
|
|
7,883 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
(5,656 |
) |
Deferred revenue and other obligations |
|
|
19,492 |
|
|
|
13,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
33,287 |
|
|
|
88,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property |
|
|
(14,438 |
) |
|
|
(14,172 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
(4,929 |
) |
Purchase of available for sale securities |
|
|
(213,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities |
|
|
444,126 |
|
|
|
762,150 |
|
Minority equity investments, net |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
210,739 |
|
|
|
533,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of 3.75% convertible notes payable at maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542,262 |
) |
Repayment of indebtedness of acquired business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,363 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
(550,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
250,142 |
|
|
|
71,602 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
220,164 |
|
|
|
892,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
470,306 |
|
|
$ |
963,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment in accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
Value of common stock issued in acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,359 |
|
Fair value of vested options assumed in acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,912 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial statements included herein for Ciena Corporation (Ciena) have been
prepared by Ciena, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report
reflect all normal recurring adjustments that Ciena considers necessary for the fair statement of
the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of Ciena at
the date of the interim balance sheets. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations. The October 31, 2007 condensed
consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. However, Ciena believes that the disclosures are adequate to understand the information presented.
The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results
for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Cienas audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007.
Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of
October in each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is
described as having ended on October 31, and each fiscal quarter is described as having ended on
January 31, April 30 and July 31 of each fiscal year.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates are used for bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments,
recoverability of intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring
liabilities and contingencies and litigation. Ciena bases its estimates on historical experience
and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results may differ materially from
managements estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash collateralizing letters of credits are
included in other current assets and other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the
restriction.
Investments
Cienas investments represent investments in marketable debt securities that are classified as
available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains or losses and declines in value on
available-for-sale securities determined to be other-than-temporary are reported in other income or
expense as incurred.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost,
which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for excess
and obsolete inventory when an impairment has been identified.
Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are
computed using the straight-line method over useful lives of two years to five years for equipment,
furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.
Impairments of equipment, furniture and fixtures are determined in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets.
6
Internal use software and web site development costs are capitalized in accordance with
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use, and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-2, Accounting for
Web Site Development Costs. Qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage,
which consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs, are capitalized
and amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Ciena has recorded goodwill and purchased intangible assets as a result of several
acquisitions. Ciena accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which requires Ciena to test each reporting units goodwill for impairment on
an annual basis, which Ciena has determined to be the last business day of its fiscal September
each year. Ciena operates its business and tests its goodwill for impairment as a single reporting
unit. Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would,
more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
Purchased
finite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is
computed using the straight-line method over the economic lives of the respective assets, generally
three to seven years, which approximates the use of intangible assets. Impairments of intangibles assets are determined in accordance SFAS 144.
Minority Equity Investments
Ciena has certain minority equity investments in privately held technology companies that are
classified as other assets. These investments are carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20%
of the voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over these
companies. These are inherently high risk investments as the markets for technologies or products
manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of investment and such markets
may never be significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all of these companies.
Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values
when necessary.
Concentrations
Substantially all of Cienas cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term
investments in marketable debt securities are maintained at two major U.S. financial institutions.
The majority of Cienas cash equivalents consist of money market funds and overnight repurchase
agreements. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits.
Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes that they
bear minimal risk.
Historically, a large percentage of Cienas revenue has been the result of sales to a small
number of communications service providers. Consolidation among Cienas customers has increased
this concentration. Consequently, Cienas accounts receivable are concentrated among these
customers. See Notes 6 and 17 below.
Additionally, Cienas access to certain raw materials is dependent upon sole or limited source
suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill Cienas supply requirements could affect future
results. Ciena relies on a small number of contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the
manufacturing for its products. If Ciena cannot effectively manage these manufacturers and forecast
future demand, or if they fail to deliver products or components on time, Cienas business may
suffer.
Revenue Recognition
Ciena recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, which states that revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the
following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to
determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and evidence of customer acceptance,
when applicable, are used to verify delivery. Ciena assesses whether the price is fixed or
determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price
is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses collectibility based primarily on the
creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the
customers payment history. In instances where final acceptance of the product, system, or solution
is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period
during which the services are to be performed.
7
Some of Cienas communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is
essential to the functionality of the equipment. Accordingly, Ciena accounts for revenue in
accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, (SOP 97-2) and all
related interpretations. SOP 97-2 incorporates additional guidance unique to software arrangements
incorporated with general revenue recognition criteria, such as, revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is
specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements, Ciena applies the provisions of SOP 97-2 to determine the amount of the
arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element
arrangements that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the
functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is
vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general
revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of
product and services revenue recognized is affected by Cienas judgments as to whether an
arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of
fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and Cienas ability to establish
vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue
recognition. For all other deliverables, Ciena applies the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF 00-21 allows for
separation of elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value
to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for
the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and
substantially in Cienas control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the
relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of
fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described
above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not met, revenue is
deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.
Warranty Accruals
Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the
recognition of the related revenue. Estimated warranty costs include material costs, technical
support labor costs and associated overhead. The warranty liability is included in cost of goods
sold and determined based upon actual warranty cost experience, estimates of component failure
rates and managements industry experience. Cienas sales contracts do not permit the right of
return of product by the customer after the product has been accepted.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on its assessment, on a specific
identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security
from its customers. In determining the appropriate balance for Cienas allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to
determine collectibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history,
account activity and communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition
changes, Ciena may be required to take a charge for an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
Research and Development
Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense
incurred in research and development include employee compensation, prototype, consulting,
depreciation, facility costs and information technologies.
Advertising Costs
Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.
Legal Costs
Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation defense as incurred.
8
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Ciena accounts for share-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123(R), as
interpreted by SAB 107. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant.
Ciena estimates the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model is affected by Cienas stock price as well as
estimates regarding a number of variables including expected stock price volatility over the term
of the award and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value
of each share-based award on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In
each case, Ciena only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of operations for those
options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest. Ciena uses two attribution methods to
record expense, the straight-line method for grants with only service-based vesting or the
graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, for all other
awards.
No tax benefits were attributed to the share-based compensation expense because a full
valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets.
Income Taxes
Ciena adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, after the end of fiscal 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in
Cienas recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment that was accounted for as an increase of $0.1
million to retained earnings, a decrease of $0.1 million to income taxes payable and the
reclassification of $6.0 million from current income taxes payable to other long-term liabilities
as of November 4, 2007. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the beginning of fiscal
2008 was $6.0 million, which includes $1.0 million of interest and some minor penalties. All of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would decrease the effective income tax rate. During the
six months ended April 30, 2008, there has been no significant change in the unrecognized tax
benefits. Ciena has reviewed its uncertain income tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 and
currently estimates no material changes in the unrecognized income tax benefits in the next twelve
months.
Ciena historically classified interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax
benefits as a component of income tax expense. With the adoption of FIN 48, Ciena is maintaining
its historical method of accruing interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits
as a component of tax expense.
In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for which the ultimate outcome may be
uncertain. In addition, tax authorities periodically audit Cienas income tax returns. These audits
examine significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the
allocation of income tax expenses among tax jurisdictions. Cienas major tax jurisdictions include
the United States and the United Kingdom, with open tax years beginning with fiscal year 2004 and
2002 respectively.
Loss Contingencies
Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as Cienas ability to reasonably
estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is
accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine
whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of Cienas financial instruments, which include short-term and long-term
investments in marketable debt securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued
expenses, approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
Foreign Currency Translation
Some of Cienas foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their
functional currency, because Ciena, as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of
these branch offices and subsidiaries with U.S. dollars. For those subsidiaries using the local
currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in
effect at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly
average rate. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of stockholders equity.
Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, re-measurement adjustments are recorded in other
income. The net gain (loss) on foreign currency re-measurement and exchange rate changes is
immaterial for separate financial statement presentation.
9
Computation of Basic Net Income per Common Share and Diluted Net Income per Dilutive Potential
Common Share
Ciena calculates earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with the SFAS 128, Earnings per
Share. This statement requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the
income statement for entities with a complex capital structure and requires a reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations.
Software Development Costs
SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, requires the capitalization of certain software development costs incurred subsequent to
the date technological feasibility is established and prior to the date the product is generally
available for sale. The capitalized cost is then amortized straight-line over the estimated product
life. Ciena defines technological feasibility as being attained at the time a working model is
completed. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the general
availability of such software has been short, and software development costs qualifying for
capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software
development costs.
Segment Reporting
SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
annual and interim reporting standards for operating segments and requires certain disclosures
about the products and services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets
and reports revenue, and its major customers. Ciena reports its financial results as a single
business segment.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Ciena is
currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on its financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-1, Application of FASB Statement
No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value
Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13. This staff
position amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. Also in February
2008 the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This
staff position delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of these staff positions could have
on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits an
entity to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will
report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Ciena is currently evaluating the
impact the adoption of this statement could have on its financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for
Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities. EITF 07-3
requires nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for
future research and development activities to be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be
recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.
If an entity does not expect the goods to be delivered or services to be rendered, the capitalized
advance payment should be charged to expense. EITF 07-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is not
permitted. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on
its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
10
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 requires all entities to report
noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Ciena is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on its financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), a revised version of SFAS 141, Business
Combinations. The revision is intended to simplify existing guidance and converge rulemaking under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) with international accounting rules. This
statement applies prospectively to business combinations where the acquisition date is on or after
the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An
entity may not apply it before that date. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of
this statement could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Its
effect will depend on the nature and significance of any acquisitions subject to this statement.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 requires additional disclosures about
the objectives of using derivative instruments, the method by which the derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No.133 and its related interpretations,
and the effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 also requires disclosure of the fair values of derivative
instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. SFAS 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early adoption encouraged. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement
could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the accounting principles to be used. Any effect of applying the provisions of this
statement will be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact the adoption
of this statement could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be Settled in Cash Upon
Conversion. APB 14-1 requires that the liability and equity components of convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) be
separately accounted for in a manner that reflects an issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing
rate. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period the convertible debt is expected
to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. APB 14-1 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Retrospective application to all periods presented is required
except for instruments that were not outstanding during any of the periods that will be presented
in the annual financial statements for the period of adoption but were outstanding during
an earlier period. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this position
could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(3) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On March 3, 2008, Ciena completed its acquisition of World Wide Packets, Inc. (World Wide
Packets or WWP) pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 22, 2008
(the Merger Agreement) by and among Ciena, World Wide Packets, Wolverine Acquisition Subsidiary,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ciena (Merger Sub), and Daniel Reiner, as shareholders
representative. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on March 3, 2008, Merger Sub was merged with and
into World Wide Packets, with World Wide Packets continuing as the surviving corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Ciena. World Wide Packets is a supplier of communications network
equipment that enables the cost-effective delivery of a wide variety of carrier Ethernet-based
services. Prior to the acquisition, World Wide Packets was a
privately held company. Cienas results of operations for the
quarter and six months ended April 30, 2008 in this report include
the operations of World Wide Packets beginning on March 3, 2008, the
effective date of the acquisition.
Upon the closing of the acquisition, all of the outstanding shares of World Wide Packets
common stock and preferred stock were exchanged for approximately 2.5 million shares of Ciena
common stock and approximately $196.7 million in cash. Of this amount, $20.0 million in cash and
340,000 shares of Ciena common stock were placed into escrow for a period of one year as security
for the indemnification obligations of World Wide Packets shareholders under the Merger Agreement.
Upon the closing, Ciena also assumed all then outstanding World Wide Packets options and exchanged
them for options to acquire approximately 0.9 million shares of Ciena common stock. Under the
Merger Agreement, Ciena also agreed to indemnify certain officers and directors of World Wide
Packets against third-party claims arising out of their employment relationship. Ciena has
determined the fair value of this indemnification obligation to be insignificant.
The following table summarizes the purchase price for the acquisition (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
196,668 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
14,133 |
|
Value of common stock issued |
|
|
62,359 |
|
Fair value of vested options assumed |
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
283,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
The value of Ciena common stock issued in the acquisition was based on the average closing
price of Cienas common stock for the two trading days prior to, the date of, and the two trading
days after the announcement of the acquisition. The fair value of the vested options assumed was
determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting which requires
the total purchase price to be allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on
their estimated fair values. The purchase price in excess of the amounts assigned to acquired
tangible or intangible assets and assumed liabilities is recognized as goodwill. Amounts allocated
to goodwill are not tax deductible. As set forth below, Ciena recorded acquired, finite-lived
intangible assets related to developed technology, customer relationships, customer contracts and
customer order backlog. The following table summarizes the allocation of the acquisition purchase
price based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
836 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,052 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
12,872 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
3,269 |
|
Other tangible assets |
|
|
2,003 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
42,400 |
|
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
3,200 |
|
Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts |
|
|
19,100 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
223,123 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(13,420 |
) |
Promissory notes and loans payable |
|
|
(12,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation |
|
$ |
283,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
Under purchase accounting rules, Ciena revalued the acquired finished goods inventory to fair
value, which is defined as the estimated selling price less the sum of (a) costs of disposal, and
(b) a reasonable profit allowance for Cienas selling effort. This revaluation resulted in an
increase in inventory carrying value of approximately $5.3 million for marketable inventory
slightly offset by a decrease of $0.7 million for unmarketable inventory.
Developed technology represents purchased technology which has reached technological
feasibility and for which World Wide Packets had substantially completed development as of the date
of acquisition. Fair value is determined using future discounted cash flows related to the
projected income stream of the developed technology for a discrete projection period. Cash flows
are discounted to their present value. Developed technology will be amortized on a straight line
basis over its estimated useful life of 4 years to 6 years.
Covenants not to compete represent agreements entered into with key employees of World Wide
Packets. Covenants not to compete will be amortized on a straight line basis over estimated useful
lives of 3.5 years.
Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts represent agreements with
existing World Wide Packets customers are expected to have estimated useful lives of 4 months to 6
years.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations
for the periods indicated as if Cienas acquisition of World Wide Packets had been completed as of
the beginning of each of the periods presented. These pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per
share data) do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained
if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in
the future.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
198,825 |
|
|
$ |
242,768 |
|
|
$ |
367,083 |
|
|
$ |
476,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
$ |
18,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
$ |
34,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted net income per potential common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Ciena has previously taken actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with
perceived market and business opportunities. Ciena historically has committed to a restructuring
plan and has incurred the associated liability concurrently in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The following table
sets forth the activity and balances of the restructuring liability accounts for the six months
ended April 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
facilities |
|
Balance at October 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
4,688 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the activity and balances of the restructuring liability
accounts for the six months ended April 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction |
|
|
facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at October 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,634 |
|
|
$ |
35,634 |
|
Additional liability recorded |
|
|
72 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Adjustment to previous estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) (b) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(4,603 |
) |
|
|
(4,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,759 |
|
|
$ |
29,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,065 |
|
|
$ |
7,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,694 |
|
|
$ |
22,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, Ciena recorded a charge of $0.1 million related to
other costs associated with a previous workforce reduction. |
|
(b) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, Ciena recorded an adjustment of $0.5 million related
to costs associated with previously restructured facilities. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2007, Ciena recorded an adjustment of $0.8 million related to its return to use of a
facility that had been previously restructured. |
13
(5) MARKETABLE DEBT SECURITIES
As of the dates indicated, short-term and long-term investments in marketable debt securities
are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
33,926 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,024 |
|
Asset backed obligations |
|
|
32,696 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
32,742 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
US government obligations |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,263 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
95,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
69,622 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
69,768 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,263 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
95,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
258,904 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
259,114 |
|
Asset backed obligations |
|
|
121,274 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
121,366 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
198,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,407 |
|
US government obligations |
|
|
31,186 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
Certificate of deposits |
|
|
246,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
855,774 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
856,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
821,828 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
822,185 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
855,774 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
856,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of commercial paper at October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008 includes
investments in SIV Portfolio plc (formerly known as Cheyne Finance plc) and Rhinebridge LLC, two
structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that entered into receivership during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2007 and failed to make payment at maturity. Due to the mortgage-related assets that they
hold, these entities have been exposed to adverse market conditions that have affected their
collateral and their ability to access short-term funding. Based on Cienas assessment of fair
value, as of October 31, 2007, Ciena recognized losses of $13.0 million related to these
investments during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Giving effect to these losses, Cienas
investment portfolio at October 31, 2007 included an estimated fair value of $33.9 million in
commercial paper issued by these entities. At April 30, 2008, commercial paper issued by these
entities had a carrying value of $25.6 million, with the $8.3 million reduction reflecting the
aggregate cash proceeds received from these SIVs during the six-month period. There were no other
changes relating to these investments or other events during the six months ended April 30, 2008
that resulted in a change in the carrying value of these investments. Information and the markets
relating to these investments remain dynamic, and there may be further declines in the value of
these investments, the value of the collateral held by these entities and the liquidity of these
investments. To the extent Ciena determines that a further decline in fair value is
other-than-temporary, Ciena may recognize additional losses in future periods up to the aggregate
amount of these investments.
14
Gross unrealized losses related to marketable debt investments were primarily due to changes
in interest rates. Cienas management has determined that the gross unrealized losses at April 30,
2008 are temporary in nature because Ciena has the ability and intent to hold these investments
until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. As of the dates indicated, gross unrealized
losses were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less |
|
|
Unrealized Losses 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than 12 Months |
|
|
Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Asset backed obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,674 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
4,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,674 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
4,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less |
|
|
Unrealized Losses 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than 12 Months |
|
|
Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
50,152 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
53,151 |
|
Asset backed obligations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
29,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
56,292 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
25,922 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
82,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes final legal maturities of debt investments at April 30, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
69,622 |
|
|
$ |
69,768 |
|
Due in 1-2 years |
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
Due in 2-5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,263 |
|
|
$ |
95,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of April 30, 2008, three customers accounted for 27.5%, 14.9% and 10.3% of net accounts
receivable, respectively. As of October 31, 2007, one customer accounted for 40.1% of net accounts
receivable.
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008 was $0.1
million and $0.2 million, respectively.
(7) INVENTORIES
As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
28,611 |
|
|
$ |
21,294 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
96,054 |
|
|
|
126,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,788 |
|
|
|
151,748 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(26,170 |
) |
|
|
(26,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102,618 |
|
|
$ |
125,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to
the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. During the first six months of fiscal 2008, Ciena
recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $10.5 million, primarily related to
changes in forecasted sales for certain products. Deductions from the provision for excess and
obsolete inventory generally relate to disposal activities. The following table summarizes the
activity in Cienas reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the period indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
Reserve for balance as of October 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
26,170 |
|
Provision for excess inventory |
|
|
10,540 |
|
Inventory disposed |
|
|
(10,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
26,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of fiscal 2007, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolete
inventory of $6.4 million, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain products.
Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory generally relate to disposal
activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas reserve for excess and obsolete
inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
Reserve for balance as of October 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
22,326 |
|
Provision for excess inventory |
|
|
6,385 |
|
Inventory disposed |
|
|
(4,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
23,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
(8) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
$ |
4,981 |
|
|
$ |
694 |
|
Prepaid VAT and other taxes |
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
14,508 |
|
Deferred deployment expense |
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
10,934 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
7,667 |
|
Other non-trade receivables |
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,817 |
|
|
$ |
42,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
As of the dates indicated, equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
$ |
269,534 |
|
|
$ |
284,329 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
37,249 |
|
|
|
40,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,783 |
|
|
|
324,976 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(260,112 |
) |
|
|
(269,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,671 |
|
|
$ |
55,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
(10) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of the dates indicated, other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
|
April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
145,073 |
|
|
$ |
(104,822 |
) |
|
$ |
40,251 |
|
|
$ |
187,473 |
|
|
$ |
(116,577 |
) |
|
$ |
70,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and licenses |
|
|
47,370 |
|
|
|
(31,708 |
) |
|
|
15,662 |
|
|
|
47,370 |
|
|
|
(34,830 |
) |
|
|
12,540 |
|
Customer
relationships,
covenants not to
compete, outstanding
purchase orders and
contracts |
|
|
45,981 |
|
|
|
(34,750 |
) |
|
|
11,231 |
|
|
|
68,281 |
|
|
|
(38,334 |
) |
|
|
29,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
238,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,144 |
|
|
$ |
303,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets was $7.2 million and $9.8
million for the quarters ended April 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The aggregate amortization
expense of other intangible assets was $14.5 million and $17.2 million for the first six months of
fiscal 2007 and 2008, respectively. During fiscal 2008, developed
technology increased by $42.4 million and customer
relationships, covenants not to compete, outstanding purchase order
and contracts increased by $22.3 million due to Cienas acquisition of World Wide Packets. See
Note 3 above. Accumulated amortization at April 30, 2008
reflects a $1.3 million decrease due to the
recognition of deferred tax assets from prior acquisitions. Expected future amortization of other
intangible assets for the fiscal years indicated is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Period ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
20,791 |
|
2009 |
|
|
32,233 |
|
2010 |
|
|
27,412 |
|
2011 |
|
|
13,852 |
|
2012 |
|
|
9,473 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
9,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
(11) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Maintenance spares inventory, net |
|
$ |
20,816 |
|
|
$ |
25,087 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
16,313 |
|
Investments in privately held companies |
|
|
6,671 |
|
|
|
6,671 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
19,499 |
|
|
|
20,755 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,738 |
|
|
$ |
72,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight line method which approximates
the effect of the effective interest rate method on the maturity of the related debt. Amortization
of debt issuance cost, which is included in interest expense, was $1.8 million and $1.7 million
during the first six months of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Warranty |
|
$ |
33,580 |
|
|
$ |
35,834 |
|
Accrued compensation, payroll related tax and benefits |
|
|
32,053 |
|
|
|
36,062 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
6,998 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
Other |
|
|
18,291 |
|
|
|
20,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90,922 |
|
|
$ |
94,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas accrued warranty for the fiscal years
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
April 30, |
|
Balance |
|
Provisions |
|
Settlements |
|
end of period |
2007 |
|
$ |
31,751 |
|
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
|
$ |
33,468 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
33,580 |
|
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
(4,829 |
) |
|
$ |
35,834 |
|
As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Products |
|
$ |
13,208 |
|
|
$ |
19,111 |
|
Services |
|
|
50,432 |
|
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,640 |
|
|
|
80,013 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(33,025 |
) |
|
|
(43,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
$ |
30,615 |
|
|
$ |
36,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12) CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Ciena 3.75% Convertible Notes, due February 1, 2008
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Ciena paid at maturity the remaining $542.3 million
in aggregate principal amount on its 3.75% convertible notes. All of the notes were retired without
conversion into common stock.
0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due May 1, 2013
On April 10, 2006, Ciena completed a public offering of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due May
1, 2013, in aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million. Interest is payable on May 1 and November
1 of each year. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of Ciena and rank equally with all of
Cienas other existing and future senior unsecured debt.
At the election of the holder, notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena
common stock at the initial conversion rate of 25.3001 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which
is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $39.5255 per share. The notes may not be redeemed
by Ciena prior to May 5, 2009. At any time on or after May 5, 2009, if the closing sale price of
Cienas common stock for at least 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period ending
on the date one day prior to the date of the notice of redemption exceeds 130% of the conversion
price, Ciena may redeem the notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price in cash equal to the
principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
If Ciena undergoes a fundamental change (as that term is defined in the indenture governing
the notes to include certain change in control transactions), holders of notes will have the right,
subject to certain exemptions, to require Ciena to purchase for cash any or all of their notes at a
price equal to the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holder elects to
convert his or her notes in connection with a specified fundamental change, in certain
circumstances, Ciena will be required to increase the applicable conversion rate, depending on the
price paid per share for Ciena common stock and the effective date of the fundamental change
transaction.
Ciena used approximately $28.5 million of the net proceeds of this offering to purchase a call
spread option on its common stock that is intended to limit exposure to potential dilution from the
conversion of the notes. See Note 14 below for a description of this call spread option.
The fair value of the outstanding $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25%
convertible senior notes was $304.5 million, based on the quoted market price for the notes on the
last trading day of Cienas second quarter of fiscal 2008.
0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2017
18
On June 11, 2007, Ciena completed a public offering of 0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due
June 15, 2017, in aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million. Interest is payable on June 15 and
December 15 of each year. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of Ciena and rank equally with
all of Cienas other existing and future senior unsecured debt.
At the election of the holder, notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena
common stock at the initial conversion rate of 26.2154 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which
is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $38.15 per share. The notes are not
redeemable by Ciena prior to maturity.
If Ciena undergoes a fundamental change (as that term is defined in the indenture governing
the notes to include certain change in control transactions), holders of notes will have the right,
subject to certain exemptions, to require Ciena to purchase for cash any or all of their notes at a
price equal to the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holder elects to
convert his or her notes in connection with a specified fundamental change, in certain
circumstances, Ciena will be required to increase the applicable conversion rate, depending on the
price paid per share for Ciena common stock and the effective date of the fundamental change
transaction.
Ciena used approximately $42.5 million of the net proceeds of this offering to purchase a call
spread option on its common stock that is intended to limit exposure to potential dilution from
conversion of the notes. See Note 14 below for a description of this call spread option.
The fair value of the outstanding $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.875%
convertible senior notes was $525.0 million, based on the quoted market price for the notes on the
last trading day of Cienas second quarter of fiscal 2008.
(13) INCOME PER SHARE CALCULATION
The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator of the basic net income per common share (Basic EPS) and the diluted
net income per dilutive potential common share (Diluted EPS). Basic EPS is computed using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted
average number of (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable upon vesting of restricted
stock units, (iii) shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, employee stock
purchase plan options and warrants using the treasury stock method; and (iv) shares underlying the
0.25% and 0.875% convertible senior notes.
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
Add: Interest expense for 0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Add: Interest expense for 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used to calculate Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
13,479 |
|
|
$ |
25,618 |
|
|
$ |
25,005 |
|
|
$ |
56,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
85,198 |
|
|
|
89,102 |
|
|
|
85,076 |
|
|
|
88,155 |
|
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options,
employees stock purchase plan options, warrants and
restricted stock units |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
93,737 |
|
|
|
110,770 |
|
|
|
93,491 |
|
|
|
110,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation of Shares Excluded due to Anti-Dilutive Effect
For the periods indicated below, the weighted average number of shares set forth in the table
below, underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan options, restricted stock
units, and warrants, is considered anti-dilutive because the exercise price of these equity awards
is greater than the average per share closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market during this period.
In addition, the weighted average number of shares underlying Cienas previously outstanding 3.75%
convertible notes, are considered anti-dilutive pursuant to SFAS 128 because the related interest
expense on a per common share if converted basis exceeds Basic EPS for the period.
19
The following table summarizes the shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for
Basic and Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Shares excluded from EPS Denominator due to anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Shares underlying stock options,
restricted stock units and warrants |
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
|
3,980 |
|
3.75% convertible notes |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
|
5,087 |
|
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
4,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Call Spread Option
Ciena holds two call spread options on its common stock relating to the shares issuable upon
conversion of two issues of its convertible notes. These call spread options are designed to
mitigate exposure to potential dilution from the conversion of the notes. Ciena purchased a call
spread option relating to the 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due May 1, 2013 for $28.5 million
during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Ciena purchased a call spread option relating to the
0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2017 for $42.5 million during the third quarter of
fiscal 2007. In each case, the call spread options were purchased at the time of the notes offering
from an affiliate of the underwriter. The cost of each call spread option was recorded as a
reduction in paid in capital.
Each call spread option is exercisable, upon maturity of the relevant issue of convertible
notes, for such number of shares of Ciena common stock issuable upon conversion of that series of
notes in full. Each call spread option has a lower strike price equal to the conversion price for
the notes and a higher strike price that serves to cap the amount of dilution protection
provided. At its election, Ciena can exercise the call spread options on a net cash basis or a net
share basis. The value of the consideration of a net share settlement will be equal to the value
upon a net cash settlement and can range from $0, if the market price per share of Ciena common
stock upon exercise is equal to or below the lower strike price, to approximately $45.7 million (in
the case of the April 2006 call spread option) or approximately $76.1 million (in the case of the
June 2007 call spread), if the market price per share of Ciena common stock upon exercise is at or
above the higher strike price. If the market price on the date of exercise is between the lower
strike price and the higher strike price, in lieu of a net settlement, Ciena may elect to receive
the full number of shares underlying the call spread option by paying the aggregate option exercise
price, which is equal to the original principal outstanding on that series of notes. Should there
be an early unwind of the call spread option, the amount of cash or shares to be received by Ciena
will depend upon the existing overall market conditions, and on Cienas stock price, the volatility
of Cienas stock and the remaining term of the call spread option. The number of shares subject to
the call spread options and the lower and higher strike prices are subject to customary
adjustments.
(15) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
Ciena has outstanding equity awards issued under its legacy equity plans and equity plans
assumed as a result of previous acquisitions. In connection with its acquisition of World Wide
Packets during the second quarter of fiscal 2008, Ciena assumed the World Wide Packets, Inc. 2000
Stock Incentive Plan and exchanged outstanding options at closing for options to acquire
approximately 0.9 million shares of Ciena common stock. Ciena will make future equity awards
exclusively from the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan described
below.
Ciena Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
The 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2008 Plan) was approved by Cienas Board of Directors
on December 12, 2007 and became effective upon the approval of Cienas shareholders on March 26,
2008. The 2008 Plan has a ten year term. The 2008 Plan reserves eight million shares of common
stock for issuance, subject to increase from time to time by the number of shares: (i) subject to
outstanding awards granted under Cienas prior equity compensation plans that terminate without
delivery of any stock (to the extent such shares would have been available for issuance under such
prior plan), and (ii) subject to awards assumed or substituted in connection with the acquisition
of another company.
20
The 2008 Plan authorizes the issuance of awards including stock options, restricted stock
units (RSUs), restricted stock, unrestricted stock, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and other
equity and/or cash performance incentive awards to employees, directors, and consultants of Ciena.
Subject to certain restrictions, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has broad
discretion to establish the terms and conditions for awards under the 2008 Plan, including the
number of shares, vesting conditions and the required service or performance criteria. Options and
SARs have a maximum term of ten years and their exercise price may not be less than 100% of fair
market value on the date of grant. Repricing of stock options and SARs is prohibited without
shareholder approval. Each share subject to an award other than stock options or SARs will reduce
the number of shares available for issuance under the 2008 Plan by 1.6 shares. Certain change in
control transactions may cause awards granted under the 2008 Plan to vest, unless the awards are
continued or substituted for in connection with the transaction. As of April 30, 2008, there were
7.8 million shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2008 Plan.
Stock Options
Outstanding stock option awards to employees are generally subject to service-based vesting
restrictions and vest incrementally over a four-year period. The following table is a summary of
Cienas stock option activity for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
Balance as of October 31, 2006 |
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
|
48.52 |
|
Granted |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
32.47 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,507 |
) |
|
|
23.04 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
41.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2007 |
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
53.67 |
|
Granted |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
33.70 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
7.21 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
60.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2008 |
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
$ |
49.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first six months of fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2008 was $2.3 million and $12.8 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of
each stock option granted by Ciena in the first six months of fiscal 2007 and 2008 was $15.77 and
$16.95, respectively.
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at April
30, 2008, based on Cienas closing stock price of $33.00 per share on the last trading day of
Cienas second quarter of fiscal 2008 (shares and intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at April 30, 2008 |
|
|
Vested Options at April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Exercise |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
$ 0.01 |
|
- |
|
$ |
16.52 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
$ |
9.40 |
|
|
$ |
22,425 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
|
$ |
9,483 |
|
$ 16.53 |
|
- |
|
$ |
17.43 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
17.21 |
|
|
|
8,971 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
17.14 |
|
|
|
5,613 |
|
$ 17.44 |
|
- |
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
21.84 |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
21.97 |
|
|
|
4,741 |
|
$ 22.97 |
|
- |
|
$ |
31.36 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
27.70 |
|
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
27.71 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
$ 31.72 |
|
- |
|
$ |
46.97 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
36.52 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
35.95 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
$ 46.98 |
|
- |
|
$ |
83.13 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
60.22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
60.22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
$ 83.14 |
|
- |
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
156.83 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
156.83 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.01 |
|
- |
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
$ |
49.15 |
|
|
$ |
42,781 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
$ |
59.41 |
|
|
$ |
23,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Assumptions for Option-Based Awards under SFAS 123(R)
Ciena recognizes the fair value of service-based options as stock-based compensation expense
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Ciena estimates the fair value of each
option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
55.8% |
|
|
|
53.0% |
|
|
|
55.8% |
|
|
|
53.0% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.4% - 4.7% |
|
|
|
2.7% - 3.2% |
|
|
|
4.4% - 5.0% |
|
|
|
2.7% - 3.6% |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
6.0 - 6.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 - 5.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 - 6.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 - 5.3 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Consistent with SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107, Ciena considered the implied volatility and
historical volatility of its stock price in determining its expected volatility, and, finding both
to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both would result in the best estimate of
expected volatility.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for
the term of Cienas employee stock options.
The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding. Because Ciena considered its options to be plain
vanilla, it calculated the expected term using the simplified method as prescribed in SAB 107 for
fiscal 2007. Under SAB 107, options are considered to be plain vanilla if they have the following
basic characteristics: they are granted at-the-money; exercisability is conditioned upon service
through the vesting date; termination of service prior to vesting results in forfeiture; there is a
limited exercise period following termination of service; and the options are non-transferable and
non-hedgeable. Beginning in fiscal 2008, as prescribed by SAB 107, Ciena gathered more detailed
historical information about specific exercise behavior of its grantees, which it used to determine
the expected term.
The dividend yield assumption is based on Cienas history and expectation of dividend payouts.
Because share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are
ultimately expected to vest, the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized reflects a
reduction for estimated forfeitures. Ciena estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises
those estimates in subsequent periods based upon new or changed information. Ciena relies upon
historical experience in establishing forfeiture rates. If actual forfeitures differ from current
estimates, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes
in estimated forfeitures.
Restricted Stock Units
A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena
common stock as the unit vests. Cienas outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to
service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a four-year period. Awards with
performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain operational, financial or
other performance criteria or targets as a condition of vesting, or acceleration of vesting, of
such awards.
22
The aggregate intrinsic value of Cienas restricted stock units is based on Cienas closing
stock price on the last trading day of each period as indicated. The following table is a summary
of Cienas restricted stock unit activity for the periods indicated, with the aggregate intrinsic
value of the balance outstanding for each period, based on Cienas closing stock price on the last
trading day of the relevant period (shares and fair value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant Date |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
Fair Value |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Per Share |
|
Value |
Balance as of October 31, 2006 |
|
|
162 |
|
|
$ |
22.99 |
|
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
27.94 |
|
|
|
53,236 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
$ |
31.32 |
|
|
$ |
70,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common
stock during the first six months of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008 was $2.5 million, and $11.3
million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of each restricted stock unit granted by
Ciena in the first six months of fiscal 2007 and 2008 was $27.83 and $31.99, respectively.
Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards under SFAS 123(R)
The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is estimated using the intrinsic value
method which is based on the closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for
service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, ratably
over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated
forfeitures, is recognized ratably over the performance period based upon Cienas determination of
whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period,
Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period
required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved
involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of
achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is
changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized
against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In March 2003, Ciena shareholders approved the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP),
which has a ten-year term. At the 2005 annual meeting, Ciena shareholders approved an amendment
increasing the number of shares available to 3.6 million and adopting an evergreen provision. On
December 31 of each year, the number of shares available under the ESPP will increase by up to 0.6
million shares, provided that the total number of shares available shall not exceed 3.6 million.
Pursuant to the evergreen provision, the maximum number of shares that may be added to the ESPP
during the remainder of its ten-year term is 2.9 million.
Under the ESPP, eligible employees may enroll in an offer period during certain open
enrollment periods. New offer periods begin March 16 and September 16 of each year.
Prior to the offer period commencing September 15, 2006, (i) each offer period consisted of
four six-month purchase periods during which employee payroll deductions were accumulated and used
to purchase shares of common stock; and (ii) the purchase price of the shares was 15% less than the
fair market value on either the first day of an offer period or the last day of a purchase period,
whichever was lower. In addition, if the fair market value on the purchase date was less than the
fair market value on the first day of an offer period, then participants automatically commenced a
new offer period.
23
On May 30, 2006, the Compensation Committee amended the ESPP, effective September 15, 2006, to
shorten the offer period under the ESPP to six months. As a result of this change, the offer period
and any purchase period will be the same six-month period. Under the amended ESPP, the applicable
purchase price equals 95% of the fair market value of Ciena common stock on the last day of each
purchase period. The following table is a summary of ESPP activity for the periods indicated
(shares and fair value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESPP shares available for |
|
Intrinisic value at |
|
|
issuance |
|
exercise date |
Balance as of October 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreen provision |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued March 15, 2007 |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
Issued September 14, 2007 |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreen provision |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued March 15, 2008 |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 30, 2008 |
|
|
3,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amendments to the ESPP for offer periods on or after September 15, 2006 were intended to
enable the ESPP to be considered a non-compensatory plan under FAS 123(R) for future offering
periods. For offer periods that commenced prior to September 15, 2006, however, fair value is
determined as of the grant date, using the graded vesting approach. Under the graded vesting
approach, the 24-month ESPP offer period, which consists of four six-month purchase periods, is
treated for valuation purpose as four separate option tranches with individual lives of six, 12, 18
and 24 months, each commencing on the initial grant date. Each tranche is expensed straight-line
over its individual life. The final offer period prior to September 15, 2006 was completed during
the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Share-Based Compensation Recognized under SFAS 123(R)
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Product costs |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
Service costs |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of sales |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
5,486 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,892 |
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating
expense |
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
13,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense capitalized in
inventory, net |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
5,648 |
|
|
$ |
8,871 |
|
|
$ |
8,937 |
|
|
$ |
15,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 30, 2008, total unrecognized compensation expense was: (i) $27.2 million, which
relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.4 years; and (ii) $56.3 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
(16) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
|
$ |
23,760 |
|
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
Change in accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
13,059 |
|
|
$ |
23,734 |
|
|
$ |
23,448 |
|
|
$ |
54,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
(17) ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of revenue based on the location
of the purchaser. Revenue attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States is
reflected as International revenue, with any country accounting for greater than 10% of total
revenue in the period specifically identified. For the periods below, Cienas geographic
distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
139,663 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
169,373 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
259,266 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
$ |
338,891 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
28,550 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
36,559 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
49,196 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
59,741 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
International |
|
|
25,314 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
36,267 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
50,166 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
70,983 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
358,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and
fixtures. Equipment, furniture and fixtures attributable to geographic regions outside of the
United States are reflected as International, with any country attributable for greater than 10%
of total equipment, furniture and fixtures specifically identified. For the periods below, Cienas
geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures was as follows (in thousands, except
percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
38,391 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
$ |
44,347 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
International |
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
11,246 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
46,671 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
55,593 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total equipment, furniture and fixtures |
For the periods below, Cienas distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except
percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
Converged Ethernet infrastructure |
|
$ |
160,425 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
203,167 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
297,298 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
393,720 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
22,196 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Global network services |
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
39,134 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
358,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
For the periods below, customers accounting for at least 10% of Cienas revenue were as
follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
26,214 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,206 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
59,880 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Company B |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,140 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Company C |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
37,088 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company D |
|
|
27,590 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company E |
|
|
39,519 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
67,914 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
71,475 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
129,692 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,323 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
$ |
126,668 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
$ |
165,769 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
236,712 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
25
(18) CONTINGENCIES
Foreign Tax Contingencies
Ciena has received assessment notices from the Mexican tax authorities asserting deficiencies
in payments between 2001 and 2005 related primarily to income taxes and import taxes and duties.
Ciena has filed judicial petitions appealing these assessments. As of October 31, 2007 and April
30, 2008, Ciena had accrued liabilities of $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, related to
these contingencies, which are reported as a component of other current accrued liabilities. As of
April 30, 2008, Ciena estimates that it could be exposed to possible losses of up to $5.9 million,
for which it has not accrued liabilities. Ciena has not accrued these liabilities because it does
not believe that such losses are more likely than not to be incurred. Ciena continues to evaluate
the likelihood of probable and reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these assessments. As
a result, future increases or decreases to accrued liabilities may be necessary and will be
recorded in the period when such amounts are probable and estimable.
Litigation
On January 31, 2008, Ciena Corporation and Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company
(previously named Litton Systems, Inc.) entered into an agreement to settle patent litigation
between the parties pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Ciena made a $7.7 million payment and agreed to indemnify the plaintiff, should it be unable to
collect compensatory damages awarded, if any, in a final judgment in its favor against a specified
Ciena supplier. This obligation is specific to this litigation and, while there is no maximum
amount payable, Cienas obligation is limited to plaintiffs collection of that portion of any
compensatory damages award that relates to the suppliers sale of infringing products to Ciena.
Ciena has determined the fair value of this guarantee to be insignificant.
As a
result of its June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., Ciena became a defendant in a securities
class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering (IPO) as defendants and alleges, among other
things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose
alleged compensation arrangements in ONIs registration statement and by engaging in manipulative
practices to artificially inflate the ONIs stock price after the IPO. The complaint also
alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to
disclose the underwriters alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The
former ONI officers have been dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints
have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings
since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated
proceeding. No specific amount of damages has been claimed in this action. On August 14, 2007, the
plaintiffs filed second amended complaints against the defendants in six focus cases
selected from the consolidated cases (which cases do not include Ciena), as well as a set
of amended master allegations against the other issuer defendants. On September 27, 2007, the
plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification based on their amended complaints and
allegations, which motion is still pending. On November 12, 2007, the defendants in the
six focus cases moved to dismiss the amended complaints, which motion was denied by the
district court on March 26, 2008. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, Ciena
cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter at this time.
26
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC
filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain
of the parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673. The complaint, which has not yet been
served upon Ciena, seeks injunctive relief and damages. Ciena believes that it has valid
defenses to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously.
In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is a subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Ciena does not expect that
the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report
discuss future events or expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial
condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, or state other forward-looking
information. Cienas forward-looking information is based on various factors and was derived
using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by
words like may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, potential or continue or the negative of those words and other comparable words.
You should be aware that these statements only reflect our current predictions and beliefs. These
statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual
events or results may differ materially. Important factors that could cause our actual results to
be materially different from the forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report,
particularly under the heading Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part II of this report below. You
should review these risk factors and the rest of this quarterly report in combination with the more
detailed description of our business in our annual report on Form 10-K, which we filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 27, 2007, for a more complete understanding of the
risks associated with an investment in Cienas securities. Ciena undertakes no obligation to revise
or update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Ciena Corporation is a supplier of communications networking equipment, software and services
that support the transport, switching, aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic.
Our products are used, individually or as part of an integrated solution, in communications
networks operated by telecommunications service providers, cable operators, governments and
enterprises around the globe. Our products facilitate the cost-effective delivery of enterprise and
consumer-oriented communication services. Through our FlexSelect Architecture, we specialize in
transitioning legacy communications networks to converged, next-generation architectures, better
able to handle increased traffic and to deliver more efficiently a broader mix of high-bandwidth
communications services. Our Ethernet service delivery products include carrier-class solutions for
delivering consumer and enterprise services across both fiber and
copper-based access networks and allow service providers to provide Ethernet services over existing TDM-based access networks. By
improving network productivity, reducing costs and enabling integrated service offerings, our
converged Ethernet infrastructure and Ethernet service delivery products create business and
operational value for our customers.
Acquisition of World Wide Packets
On March 3, 2008, we completed our acquisition of World Wide Packets, Inc. (WWP), a provider
of communications network equipment that enables the cost-effective delivery of a variety of
carrier Ethernet-based services. WWP designs products for the access and aggregation tiers of
communications networks, and its products are typically deployed in metro and access networks. We
believe that this transaction will improve our time to market with carrier Ethernet products and
allow us to reach new customers and customer segments, while strengthening our position within
existing customer networks. We also believe that this acquisition will enable us to penetrate
additional application segments, including Ethernet business services, wireless backhaul, and
Ethernet infrastructure for high-bandwidth services such as IPTV and triple play.
Upon the closing of the acquisition, all of the outstanding common stock and preferred stock
of WWP was exchanged for approximately 2.5 million shares of Ciena common stock and approximately
$196.7 million in cash. Of this amount, 340,000 shares of Ciena common stock and $20.0 million in
cash were placed into escrow for a period of one year as security for the indemnification
obligations of WWP shareholders under the merger agreement. Ciena also assumed all then outstanding
WWP employee stock options and exchanged them for options to acquire approximately 0.9 million
shares of Ciena common stock. See Note 3 to the financial statements included in Item 1 of Part 1
of this report for additional information related to the acquisition and the consideration paid,
and Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part II of this report, for a discussion of certain risks
associated with this transaction.
27
As
a result of this acquisition, we recorded $223.1 million in goodwill and $64.7 million in
other intangible assets. We will amortize the other intangible assets over their useful lives. See
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Goodwill and Intangibles below for information
relating to these items and our test for impairment. Under purchase accounting rules, we revalued
the acquired WWP finished goods inventory to fair value at the time of the acquisition. This
revaluation increased marketable inventory carrying value by approximately $5.3 million. Of this
amount, we recognized $1.1 million as an increase in cost of goods sold during the second quarter
of fiscal 2008, with the balance expected to be recognized during the remainder of fiscal 2008. See
Note 3 to the financial statements included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report for additional
information. We expect that our acquisition of WWP will be dilutive to our fiscal 2008 earnings.
Financial Results
Revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 was $242.2 million, representing a 6.5% increase
from $227.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and a 25.1% increase from $193.5 million
for second quarter of fiscal 2007. Our international revenue increased from $57.9 million, or 25.5%
of revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, to $72.8 million, or 30.1% of revenue in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008. We believe that our FlexSelect Architecture and Ethernet/IP-related
enhancements to our product portfolio have enabled us to benefit from both increasing network
capacity requirements and investments by our customers in transitioning to more efficient and
economical communications network architectures. Network capacity requirements have increased with
the growth in reliance by consumers and enterprises upon high-bandwidth applications and services.
The resulting broader mix of high-volume traffic is driving a transition from legacy network
infrastructures to more efficient, simplified, Ethernet-based network architectures. Our
acquisition of World Wide Packets and expanded research and development investment across our
portfolio are part of our strategy to capitalize on the transition to Ethernet-based network
architectures.
Three customers each accounted for more than 10% of our revenue and together represented 52.3%
of our revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2008. While we believe this illustrates our success
in leveraging our incumbent position within our large carrier customers, the resulting
concentration of revenue among a relatively small number of customers increases the risk of
quarterly fluctuations in our revenue and operating results. The timing and size of equipment
orders, our ability to deliver products to fulfill those orders, and the timing of product
acceptance for revenue recognition all contribute to and can cause fluctuations in our revenue and
operating results on a quarterly basis. Concentrations in revenue exacerbate our exposure to
reductions in spending or changes in network strategy involving one or more of our significant
customers.
Gross margin for the second quarter was 52.7%, up from 51.3% for the first quarter of fiscal
2008 and 42.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. For the second quarter of fiscal 2008, product
gross margin was 55.6% and services gross margin was 28.7%. Increased gross margin for the second
quarter reflects favorable product and customer mix and an improvement in service gross margin. We
expect gross margin to decline slightly during the third quarter of fiscal 2008, in part due to the
negative effect of the revaluation of the acquired WWP inventory described above. Gross margin
continues to be susceptible to quarterly fluctuation due to a number of factors, including product
and customer mix during the period, our ability to drive further product cost reductions, the level
of pricing pressure we encounter, the effect of our services gross margin, the introduction of new
products or entry into new markets, charges for excess and obsolete inventory and changes in
warranty costs.
Operating expense
for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 was $108.6 million, an increase from $98.2 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 and $79.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Operating
expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 included a $7.7 million patent litigation
settlement. Increased operating expense reflects higher employee costs, relating to significant
headcount growth and increased share-based compensation expense, and additional expense due to
our acquisition of WWP during the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Increased operating expense
also reflects additional expense relating to our acceleration of research and development
initiatives that seek to expand our addressable market and extend the portfolio of our recently
acquired WWP products. We expect our ongoing operating expense to increase during fiscal 2008 to
fund research and development and hire additional sales and administrative resources to support
the growth of our business.
Income from operations increased from $18.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 to
$19.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
On February 1, 2008, we paid the remaining principal balance of $542.3 million upon maturity
of our 3.75% convertible notes. On March 3, 2008, we paid
approximately $210.8 million in cash
consideration and acquisition-related expenses in connection with our acquisition of WWP. Lower
cash balances resulting from the payments above, together with lower interest rates, resulted in a
$10.6 million sequential decrease in interest and other income, net from the first to the second
quarter of fiscal 2008. This decline was partially offset by a $5.5 million decrease in interest
expense from the first to the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Consequently, net income decreased
from $28.8 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, to $23.8
million, or $0.23 per diluted share for the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Due to lower cash
balances and reduced interest rates, we expect our interest income to decrease during the remainder
of fiscal 2008.
28
We generated $74.9 million in cash from operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2008,
consisting of $57.7 million in cash from net income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and $17.2
million resulting from changes in working capital. This compares with $13.7 million in cash from
operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, consisting of $56.1 million in cash from net
income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and a $42.4 million net use of cash resulting from changes
in working capital.
We
had $963.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $95.4 million short-term and long-term
investments in marketable debt securities at April 30, 2008. See Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Investments below for information relating to the loss we recognized during the
fourth quarter of 2007 related to our investments in commercial paper issued by two structured
investment vehicles and the remaining $25.6 million included in long-term investments at April 30,
2008 related to these investments.
As of April 30, 2008 head count was 2,119, an increase from 1,853 at January 31, 2008 and
1,638 at April 30, 2007.
Potential Release of Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
Because
of our losses in prior periods, we have provided a valuation allowance fully
offsetting our gross deferred tax assets of $1.2 billion. See Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance for a discussion of this valuation allowance. We
believe it is likely that we will release all, or a significant portion of this
valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, although the exact timing is subject to
change based on the level of profitability that we are able to achieve for the remainder of fiscal
2008 and our visibility into future period results. We expect that a significant portion of the release of the valuation
allowance will be recorded as an income tax benefit at the time of release, significantly
increasing our reported net income. Because we expect our recorded tax rate to increase in
subsequent periods following any significant release of the valuation allowance, our net income would
be affected in periods following the release. Any valuation allowance release will not affect the
amount of cash paid for income taxes.
Results of Operations
Our
results of operations for the quarter and six months ended
April 30, 2008 include the operations of World Wide Packets beginning on
March 3, 2008, the effective date of the acquisition.
In this report we discuss our revenue in three major groupings as follows:
|
1. |
|
Converged Ethernet Infrastructure. This group incorporates our transport and
switching products and packet interworking products and related software. |
|
|
2. |
|
Ethernet Service Delivery. Formerly known as Ethernet access, this group has
been renamed and includes our broadband access products, Ethernet access products and
recently acquired WWP products, including the related software. |
|
|
3. |
|
Global Network Services. This group reflects deployment, support and training
activities. |
Cost of goods sold consists of component costs, direct compensation costs, warranty and other
contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, direct technical support costs, cost of excess
and obsolete inventory and overhead related to manufacturing, technical support, and engineering,
furnishing and installation (EF&I) operations.
29
Three months ended April 30, 2007 compared to three months ended April 30, 2008
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
173,212 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
$ |
42,969 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Services |
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
193,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
48,672 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
91,319 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Services |
|
|
20,378 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
111,697 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
114,603 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
81,830 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
$ |
127,596 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
$ |
45,766 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
173,212 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
216,181 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
42,969 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
91,319 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
96,041 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
81,893 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
$ |
120,140 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
38,247 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
20,315 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
26,018 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,703 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
20,378 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
18,562 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,519 |
|
|
|
(11,934.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
30
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in distribution
of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Converged ethernet
infrastructure |
|
$ |
160,425 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
203,167 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
42,742 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Global network services |
|
|
20,315 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
26,018 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
48,672 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
Revenue from sales to customers outside of the United States is reflected as International
in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage
data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United
States |
|
$ |
139,663 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
169,373 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
29,710 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
International |
|
|
53,864 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
72,826 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
18,962 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
242,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
48,672 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in
thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
26,214 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company B |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Company C |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Company D |
|
|
27,590 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company E |
|
|
39,519 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
67,914 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,323 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
$ |
126,668 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
Product revenue increased primarily due to a $42.7 million increase in sales of our
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. Increased converged Ethernet revenue reflects a
$37.6 million increase in sales of core switching products and a $25.3 million increase in
sales of our CN 4200 FlexSelect Advanced Service Platform, partially offset by a $18.8
million decrease in core transport products. We believe that our converged Ethernet
infrastructure revenue has benefitted from both increasing network capacity requirements
and customer transition to more efficient and economical network architectures. In
particular, sales of our core switching products have benefited from an expansion in
mesh-style optical networks. Product revenue for the second
quarter of fiscal 2008 also reflects initial sales of products from our WWP acquisition. |
|
|
|
Services revenue increased primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in deployment
services sales and a $2.0 million increase in maintenance and support services, reflecting
higher sales volume and increased installation activity. |
|
|
|
United States revenue increased primarily due to a $27.9 million increase in sales of
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. This primarily reflects a $27.2 million
increase in sales of core switching products and a $13.8 million increase in sales of CN
4200, partially offset by an $11.2 million decrease in core transport products. |
|
|
|
International revenue increased primarily due to a $14.8 million increase in sales of
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. This primarily reflects an $11.5 million
increase in sales of CN 4200 and a $10.4 million increase in sales of core switching
products, partially offset by a $7.7 million decrease in core transport products.
International revenue benefited from increased service revenue, primarily due to a $2.9
million increase in deployment services. |
31
Gross profit
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased due to significant improvements in
product and services gross margin. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue increased primarily due to
favorable product mix, including a higher concentration of core switching products, as well
as product cost reductions, improved manufacturing efficiencies, and lower warranty
expense. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased significantly
over the negative gross margin achieved in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 due to
improved deployment efficiencies. Services gross margin remains heavily dependent upon the
mix of services in a given period and may fluctuate from quarter to quarter. |
Operating expense
Increased operating expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 reflects, in part, the
acquisition WWP on March 3, 2008. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth
the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
31,642 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
44,628 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
12,986 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
30,182 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
38,591 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,707 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8,760 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
Restructuring recoveries |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
79,092 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
108,629 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
29,537 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
|
|
Research and development expense increased due to higher employee compensation cost of
$8.6 million, including a $1.2 million increase in share-based compensation expense,
primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases included $2.6 million in
consulting expense and $1.3 million in non-capitalized development tools and software
maintenance support. |
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense increased primarily due a $4.7 million increase in
employee compensation cost, including a $1.1 million increase in share-based compensation
expense, primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases included $1.1 million in
travel and entertainment expense, $0.9 million in consulting expense, and $0.8 million in facilities and
information systems expenses. |
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased due to higher employee compensation cost of
$2.5 million, including a $0.3 million increase in share-based compensation expense,
primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases included $1.3 million in
consulting expense and $1.1 million in facilities and
information systems expenses. |
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs increased due to the purchase of intangible
assets associated with the acquisition of WWP. See Note 3 to the financial statements
included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report for additional
information related to purchased intangible assets. |
|
|
|
Restructuring recoveries during fiscal 2007 primarily reflect adjustments related to the
return to use of previously restructured facilities. |
32
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
16,897 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
8,487 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
(8,410 |
) |
|
|
(49.8 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
6,148 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(4,287 |
) |
|
|
(69.7 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
|
284.3 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
|
|
Interest and other income, net decreased due to lower average cash and investment
balances resulting from the repayment at maturity of the $542.3 million principal
outstanding on our 3.75% convertible notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and use
of $210.0 million in cash consideration and acquisition-related expenses during the
acquisition of WWP in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Interest income was also
significantly affected by lower interest rates on investment balances. |
|
|
Interest expense decreased primarily due the repayment of 3.75% convertible notes at
maturity at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This decrease was slightly offset
by the interest associated with our June 11, 2007 issuance of 0.875% convertible senior
notes. |
|
|
Provision for income taxes increased primarily due to increased federal and state tax
expense. This increase is largely offset, except for any alternative minimum tax, by tax
benefits for deferred tax assets that were previously reserved against by a valuation
allowance. To the extent these benefits relate to deferred tax assets from acquisitions,
the benefit is recorded by reducing intangible assets rather than tax expense. See
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance below for
information relating to our deferred tax valuation allowance and the conditions required
for its release. |
Six months ended April 30, 2007 compared to six months ended April 30, 2008
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
319,494 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
|
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
$ |
98,477 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Services |
|
|
39,134 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
12,510 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
358,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
110,987 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
166,298 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
21,130 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Services |
|
|
36,872 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
203,170 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
225,450 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
22,280 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
155,458 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
244,165 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
$ |
88,707 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
33
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
319,494 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
417,971 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
98,477 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
166,298 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
21,130 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
153,196 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
230,543 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
77,347 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
39,134 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
51,644 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
12,510 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
36,872 |
|
|
|
94.2 |
|
|
|
38,022 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
2,262 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
13,622 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
11,360 |
|
|
|
502.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in distribution
of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Converged ethernet
infrastructure |
|
$ |
297,298 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
393,720 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
96,422 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
Ethernet service delivery |
|
|
22,196 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Global network services |
|
|
39,134 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
51,644 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
12,510 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
358,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,987 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
Revenue from sales to customers outside of the United States is reflected as International
in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage
data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United States |
|
$ |
259,266 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
$ |
338,891 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
79,625 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
International |
|
|
99,362 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
130,724 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
31,362 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
358,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
469,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,987 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
34
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in
thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
57,206 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
59,880 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Company B |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,140 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Company C |
|
|
37,088 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company E |
|
|
71,475 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
129,692 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
165,769 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
236,712 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
Product revenue increased primarily due to a $96.4 million increase in sales of our
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. Increased converged Ethernet revenue reflects a
$68.7 million increase in sales of core switching products and a $29.9 million increase in
sales of CN 4200. |
|
|
|
Services revenue increased primarily due to an $8.3 million increase in deployment
services sales and a $4.7 million increase in maintenance and support services, reflecting
higher sales volume and increased installation activity. |
|
|
|
United States revenue increased primarily due to a $71.4 million increase in sales of
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. This primarily reflects a $52.8 million
increase in sales of core switching products and a $21.2 million increase in sales of CN
4200. |
|
|
|
International revenue increased primarily due to a $25.0 million increase in sales of
converged Ethernet infrastructure products. This primarily reflects a $15.9 million
increase in sales of core switching products and an $8.6 million increase in sales of CN
4200, partially offset by a $5.7 million decrease in core transport products. International
revenue also benefited from increased service revenue, primarily due to a $4.1 million
increase in deployment services. |
Gross profit
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased due to significant improvements in
product and services gross margin. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue increased primarily due to
favorable product mix, including a higher concentration of core switching products, as well
as product cost reductions, improved manufacturing efficiencies, and lower warranty
expense. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased significantly, as
a result of improved deployment efficiencies. Services gross margin remains heavily
dependent upon the mix of services in a given period and may fluctuate from quarter to
quarter. |
35
Operating expense
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
61,495 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
$ |
80,072 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
18,577 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
55,057 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
72,199 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
17,142 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
21,998 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
39,278 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
17,280 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
12,590 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
15,230 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
Restructuring recoveries |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
149,940 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
206,779 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
56,839 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
|
|
Research and development expense increased due to higher employee compensation cost of
$12.8 million, including a $1.6 million increase in share-based compensation expense,
primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases included $3.6 million in
consulting expense and $1.6 million in non-capitalized development tools and software
maintenance support. |
|
|
Selling and marketing expense increased primarily due a $9.3 million increase in
employee compensation, including a $2.5 million increase in share-based compensation
expense, primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases included $2.0 million in
consulting expense, $1.8 million in travel and entertainment expense, $1.5 million in facilities and
information systems expenses and $1.2 million in marketing programs. |
|
|
General and administrative expense increased due to increased legal expense of $8.2
million, primarily related to a $7.7 million settlement of patent litigation during the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. Increased general and administrative expense also reflects a
$5.3 million increase in employee compensation, including a $1.5 million increase in
share-based compensation expense, primarily reflecting increased headcount. Other increases
included $2.4 million in facilities and information systems expenses and $1.4 million in
consulting expense. |
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs increased due to the purchase of intangible
assets associated with the acquisition of WWP. See Note 3 to the financial statements
included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report for additional information related to purchased
intangible assets. |
|
|
Restructuring recoveries during fiscal 2007 primarily reflect adjustments related to the
return to use of previously restructured facilities. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
%* |
|
2008 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
31,742 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
27,569 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
(4,173 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
12,296 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3,077 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,169 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
|
252.9 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2007 to 2008 |
|
|
Interest and other income, net decreased due to lower average cash and investment
balances resulting from the repayment at maturity of the $542.3 million principal
outstanding on our 3.75% convertible notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and use
of $210.0 million in cash consideration and acquisition-related expenses during the
acquisition of WWP in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Interest income was also
significantly affected by lower
interest rates on investment balances. |
|
|
Interest expense decreased primarily due the repayment of 3.75% convertible notes at
maturity at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This decrease was slightly offset
by the interest associated with our June 11, 2007 issuance of 0.875% convertible senior
notes. |
|
|
Provision for income taxes increased primarily due to increased federal and state tax
expense. This increase is largely offset, except for any alternative minimum tax, by tax
benefits for deferred tax assets that were previously reserved against by a valuation
allowance. To the extent these benefits relate to deferred tax assets from acquisitions,
the benefit is recorded by reducing intangible assets rather than tax expense. See
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance below for
information relating to our deferred tax valuation allowance and the conditions required
for its release. |
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At April 30, 2008, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments in marketable debt securities and cash from operations. The following table
summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
892,061 |
|
|
$ |
963,852 |
|
|
$ |
71,791 |
|
Short-term investments in marketable debt securities |
|
|
822,185 |
|
|
|
69,768 |
|
|
|
(752,417 |
) |
Long-term investments in marketable debt securities |
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
(8,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments in
marketable debt securities |
|
$ |
1,748,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,261 |
|
|
$ |
(688,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in total cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities
at April 30, 2008 was primarily related to the repayment of the $542.3 million principal
outstanding on our 3.75% convertible notes at maturity on February 1, 2008 and the $210.0 million
in cash consideration and acquisition-related expenses paid as part of our acquisition of WWP on
March 3, 2008. This was partially offset by our cash provided by operating activities during the
first six months of fiscal 2008 described in Operating Activities below. Based on past
performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, investments in
marketable debt securities and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital
needs, capital expenditures, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing
operations through at least the next 12 months.
Included in long-term investments in marketable debt securities at October 31, 2007 and April
30, 2008 is approximately $33.9 million and $25.6 million, respectively, in investments in
commercial paper issued by two structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that entered into receivership
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 and failed to make payment at maturity. Due to the
mortgage-related assets that they hold, these entities have been exposed to adverse market
conditions that have affected the value of their collateral, their ability to access short-term
funding and the liquidity and value of our investment. These investments are no longer trading and
have no readily determinable market value. Based on our assessment of fair value, as of October 31,
2007, we recognized losses of $13.0 million related to these investments during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2007. We are not aware of any of our other marketable debt securities that have
experienced a similar decline. The $8.3 million reduction in carrying value of these investments
during the first six months of fiscal 2008 reflects the aggregate cash proceeds received from these
SIVs during the six-month period. There were no other changes relating to these investments or
other events during the first six months of 2008 that resulted in a change in the carrying value of
these investments. It is still possible, however, that we may realize further reductions in fair
value, additional losses or a complete loss of these investments. See Risk Factors and Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Investments, below for additional information regarding our
determination of the fair value of these investments.
The following sections review the significant activities that had an impact on our cash during
the first six months of fiscal 2008.
37
Operating Activities
The following tables set forth (in thousands) significant components of our $88.6 million of
cash generated by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal 2008:
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our net income for the first six months of fiscal 2008 included the significant non-cash items
summarized in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
8,567 |
|
Share-based compensation costs |
|
|
15,752 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
17,165 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
1,296 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
10,540 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total significant non-cash charges |
|
$ |
60,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Net
Excluding
the addition of $2.1 million of accounts receivable recorded in connection with the
acquisition of WWP, cash consumed by accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable,
increased by $26.0 million from the end of fiscal 2007 through the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) increased from 48 days for fiscal 2007 to 51 days for the first
six months of fiscal 2008. Our accounts receivable balance increased primarily due to revenue
growth during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to our accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, from the end of fiscal 2007 through the first six
months of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
104,078 |
|
|
$ |
132,065 |
|
|
$ |
27,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
Excluding the non-cash effect of a $10.5 million provision for excess and obsolescence and the
addition of $12.9 million of inventory recorded in connection with the acquisition of WWP, cash
consumed by inventory for the first six months of fiscal 2008 was $20.5 million. Cienas inventory
turns decreased from 3.3 for fiscal 2007 to 2.8 for the first six months of fiscal 2008. The
following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to the components of our inventory from the end
of fiscal 2007 through the first six months of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
28,611 |
|
|
$ |
21,294 |
|
|
$ |
(7,317 |
) |
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
96,054 |
|
|
|
126,100 |
|
|
|
30,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross inventory |
|
|
128,788 |
|
|
|
151,748 |
|
|
|
22,960 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(26,170 |
) |
|
|
(26,342 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
102,618 |
|
|
$ |
125,406 |
|
|
$ |
22,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Accounts payable
Excluding the addition of $7.3 million to accounts payable from the acquisition of WWP, cash
from accounts payable increased by $7.9 million during the first six months of fiscal 2008. This
increase is primarily due to inventory received during the last few weeks of the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 for which we have not yet paid. The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes
in our accounts payable from the end of fiscal 2007 through the first six months of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
55,389 |
|
|
$ |
69,953 |
|
|
$ |
14,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Payable on Cienas Convertible Notes
We paid the final $10.2 million interest payment on our 3.75% convertible notes, due February
1, 2008, during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Interest on our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes, due May 1, 2013, is payable on May
1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1, 2006. Ciena paid $0.4 million in interest
on the 0.25% convertible notes during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Interest on our outstanding 0.875% convertible senior notes, due June 15, 2017, is payable on
June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2007. Ciena paid $2.2 million in
interest on the 0.875% convertible notes during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
The indentures governing our outstanding convertible notes do not contain any financial
covenants. The indentures provide for customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breaches of covenants, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency and reorganization. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the principal
amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, may be declared immediately due and
payable. These amounts automatically become due and payable if an event of default relating to
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occurs. For additional information about
our convertible notes, see Note 12 to our financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this
report.
The following table reflects (in thousands) the balance of interest payable and the change in
this balance from the end of fiscal 2007 through the first six months of fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
$ |
6,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
(5,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
Excluding the effect of $3.2 million in deferred revenue added as a result of the acquisition
of WWP, deferred revenue increased by $13.2 million during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Product deferred revenue represents payments received in advance of shipment and payments received
in advance of our ability to recognize revenue. Services deferred revenue is related to payment for
service contracts that will be recognized over the contract term. The following table reflects (in
thousands) the balance of deferred revenue and the change in this balance from the end of fiscal
2007 through the first six months of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Products |
|
$ |
13,208 |
|
|
$ |
19,111 |
|
|
$ |
5,903 |
|
Services |
|
|
50,432 |
|
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
10,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
$ |
63,640 |
|
|
$ |
80,013 |
|
|
$ |
16,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Investing Activities
During the first six months of fiscal 2008, we received approximately $762.2 million in
proceeds from the maturity of marketable debt securities. These proceeds were used to fund the
repayment of our 3.75% convertible notes at maturity and the cash consideration paid as part of our
acquisition of World Wide Packets on March 3, 2008. In connection with this acquisition, Ciena paid
cash consideration of approximately $196.7 million and incurred acquisition-related expenses of
$14.1 million. Ciena also paid equity consideration in the acquisition as described in Note 3 to
the financial statements included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report for an aggregate purchase
price of $283.1 million.
Financing Activities
On February 1, 2008, we paid the remaining principal balance of $542.3 million upon maturity
of our 3.75% convertible notes. Cash received from financing activities during the first six months
of fiscal 2008 also includes $4.6 million relating to the exercise of employee stock options.
Contractual Obligations
During the first six months of fiscal 2008, we did not experience material changes, outside of
the ordinary course of business and our acquisition of WWP, in our contractual obligations from
those reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007. The following is a summary of
our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of April 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Convertible notes |
|
$ |
845,313 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
10,250 |
|
|
$ |
10,250 |
|
|
$ |
819,688 |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
67,312 |
|
|
|
13,637 |
|
|
|
20,737 |
|
|
|
14,953 |
|
|
|
17,985 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
109,903 |
|
|
|
109,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3) |
|
$ |
1,022,528 |
|
|
$ |
128,665 |
|
|
$ |
30,987 |
|
|
$ |
25,203 |
|
|
$ |
837,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount for operating leases above does not include insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are variable and are not expected to have a material impact. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm, non-cancelable and unconditional obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
As of April 30, 2008, we had approximately $6.1 million of other long-term
obligations in our condensed consolidated balance sheet for unrecognized tax
positions that are not included in this table because the periods of cash
settlement with the respective tax authority cannot be reasonably estimated.
|
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set forth
above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial
commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of April 30, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
19,904 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
19,134 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Ciena does not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do
not have any equity interests in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose
entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are
subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, goodwill, income
taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent
that there are material differences between our estimates and actual results, our consolidated
financial statements will be affected.
40
We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where
significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which states that
revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price
to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase
agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an
arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify
delivery. We assess whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms
associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We
assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by
credit checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history. In instances where final
acceptance of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred
until all acceptance criteria have been met. Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred
and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed.
Some of our communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential
to the functionality of the equipment. Accordingly, we account for revenue in accordance with SOP
No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and all related interpretations. SOP 97-2 incorporates
additional guidance unique to software arrangements incorporated with general accounting guidance,
such as, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where
final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all
acceptance criteria have been met.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements, we apply the provisions of SOP 97-2 to determine the amount of the
arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element
arrangements that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the
functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is
vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general
revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of
product and services revenue recognized is affected by our judgments as to whether an arrangement
includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value
exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish vendor-specific
objective evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other
deliverables, we apply the provisions of EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. EITF 00-21 allows for separation of elements into more than one unit of accounting
if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and
reliable evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the
undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially within our control. Revenue is allocated to
each unit of accounting based on the relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the
residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s).
The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting.
If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element
has been delivered.
Our total deferred revenue for products was $13.2 million and $19.1 million as of October 31,
2007 and April 30, 2008, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over
the period during which the services are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services
was $50.4 million and $60.9 million as of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
We recognize share-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123(R), Share-Based
Payments, as
interpreted by SAB 107. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation
expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. We estimate the
fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. This option pricing model requires that we make several estimates, including the options
expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected life of employee stock
options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain
outstanding. Because we considered our options to be plain vanilla, we calculated the expected
term using the simplified method as prescribed in SAB 107 for fiscal 2007. Under SAB 107, options
are considered to be plain vanilla if they have the following basic characteristics: they are
granted at-the-money; exercisability is conditioned upon service through the vesting date;
termination of service prior to vesting results in forfeiture; there is a limited exercise period
following termination of service; and the options are non-transferable and non-hedgeable. Beginning
in fiscal 2008, as prescribed by SAB 107, we gathered more detailed historical information about
specific exercise behavior of our grantees, which we used to determine expected term. We considered
the implied volatility and historical volatility of our stock price in determining our expected
volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both
measures would result in the best estimate of expected volatility. We recognize the estimated fair
value of option-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as stock-based compensation expense on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
41
We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our
common stock on the date of grant. Our outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the
estimated fair value of service-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense
ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-based vesting
conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as
a condition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of
performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance
period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based
upon our determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At
each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the performance targets and the
performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance targets will
be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on
changes in the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the
period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost
is ultimately recognized against that goal, and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation
cost is reversed.
No tax benefits were attributed to the share-based compensation expense because a full
valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets.
Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to
vest, the amount of expense takes into account estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in these estimates and assumptions can
materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note 15
to our financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information regarding our
assumptions related to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based compensation expense
we incurred for the periods covered in this report. As of April 30, 2008, total unrecognized
compensation expense was: (i) $27.2 million, which relates to unvested stock options and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years; and (ii) $56.3 million,
which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the
appropriate reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become
obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory
write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. Upon recognition of the write down,
a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and
circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We
recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $6.4 million and $10.5 million in the first
six months of fiscal 2007 and 2008 respectively. These charges were primarily related to excess
inventory due to a change in forecasted product sales. In an effort to limit our exposure to
delivery delays and to satisfy customer needs we purchase inventory based on forecasted sales
across our product lines. In addition, part of our research and development strategy is to promote
the convergence of similar features and functionalities across our product lines. Each of these
practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order those products for which we have
forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted. Historically, we have experienced
write downs due to changes in strategic direction, discontinuance of a product and declines in
market conditions. If actual market conditions differ from those we have assumed, if there is a
sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there is a higher incidence of
inventory obsolescence due to a rapid change in technology, we may be required to take additional
inventory write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Our inventory net of
allowance for excess and obsolete was $102.6 million and $125.4 as of October 31, 2007 and April
30, 2008, respectively.
42
Restructuring
As part of our restructuring costs, we provide for the estimated cost of the net lease expense
for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of the
minimum future lease payments under our contracted lease obligations, offset by the fair value of
the estimated sublease payments that we may receive. As of April 30, 2008, our accrued
restructuring liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $4.2 million.
The total minimum lease payments for these restructured facilities are $18.8 million. These lease
payments will be made over the remaining lives of our leases, which range from one month to eleven
years. If actual market conditions are different than those we have projected, we will be required
to recognize additional restructuring costs or benefits associated with these facilities.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on managements assessment, on a
specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing
credit evaluations of our customers and generally have not required collateral or other forms of
security from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for our allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to
determine collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account
activity and communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition changes, or if
actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be required to take a charge for
an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable which could have an adverse impact on our results of
operations. Our accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts was $104.1 million and
$132.1 as of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts as of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively.
Goodwill
As of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008, our consolidated balance sheet included $232.0
million and $455.1 million in goodwill, respectively. Goodwill represents the excess purchase
price over amounts assigned to tangible or identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed from our acquisitions. The increase above reflects goodwill recorded in connection with
our acquisition of World Wide Packets. See Note 3 to the financial statements included in Item 1
of Part 1 of this report for additional information related to the allocation of the purchase
price.
In accordance with SFAS 142, we test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we
have determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. We also test our
goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that
would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
No such event or circumstance occurred during the first six months of fiscal 2008.
For fiscal 2007, we determined fair value of our single reporting unit to be equal to our
market capitalization plus a control premium. Market capitalization was determined by multiplying
the shares outstanding on the assessment date by the average market price of our common stock over
a 10-day period before and a 10-day period after each assessment date. We use this 20-day duration
to consider inherent market fluctuations that may affect any individual closing price. In
determining fair value, we added a control premium which seeks to give effect to the increased
consideration a potential acquirer may be required to pay in order to gain sufficient ownership to
set policies, direct operations and make decisions related to our company to our market
capitalization. For fiscal 2007, we used a 25% control premium in our goodwill assessment.
Our stock price is a significant factor in assessing our fair value for purposes of the
goodwill impairment assessment. Our stock price can be affected by, among other things, changes in
industry or market conditions, changes in our results of operations, and changes in our forecasts
or market expectations relating to future results. In assessing whether there has been a
triggering event for an interim impairment assessment, we consider indicators of impairment
including fluctuations in stock price. If we suffer a sustained decline in our stock price and our
market capitalization declines below our carrying value, we will assess whether the goodwill has
been impaired. In this instance, our estimate of the appropriate control premium to apply in
determining fair value could be an important variable in our goodwill impairment assessment. A
significant impairment could result in additional charges and have a material adverse impact on
our financial condition and operating results.
For fiscal 2007, Ciena performed an assessment of the fair value of its single reporting unit
as of September 29, 2007 and our market capitalization, as determined above, was approximately
$3.6 billion, exceeding our carrying value at that date of $0.9 billion. Because our market
capitalization exceeded our carrying value without giving effect to the control premium, our
estimate of the control premium was not a determining factor in the outcome of impairment
assessment. No goodwill impairment loss was recorded in fiscal 2007 because our carrying value,
including goodwill, did not exceed fair value.
43
Intangible Assets
As of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008, our consolidated balance sheet included $67.1
million and $113.4 million in other intangible assets, net, respectively. The increase above
reflects intangibles recorded in connection with our acquisition of World Wide Packets. See Note 3
to the financial statements included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report for additional information
related to the allocation of the purchase price.
We account for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets such as equipment, furniture,
fixtures, and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144. In accordance
with SFAS 144, we test each intangible asset for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount may not be recoverable. Valuation of our
intangible assets requires us to make assumptions about future sales prices and sales volumes for
our products that involve new technologies and uncertainties around customer acceptance of new
products. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts change, we may be required to record
additional impairment charges in future periods. Such charges would have the effect of decreasing
our earnings or increasing our losses in such period.
Investments
We have an investment portfolio comprised of marketable debt securities including short-term
commercial paper, certificates of deposit, corporate bonds, asset-backed obligations and U.S.
government obligations. The value of these securities is subject to market volatility for the
period we hold these investments and until their sale or maturity. We recognize losses when we
determine that declines in the fair value of our investments, below their cost basis, are
other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we
consider various factors including market price (when available), investment ratings, the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than our cost basis, and our intent and ability to hold the investment
until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market
value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors. If we judge that a decline in
fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued at the current fair value, and we
would incur a loss equal to the decline, which could materially adversely affect our profitability
and results of operations.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we determined that declines in the estimated fair
value of our investments in certain commercial paper were other-than-temporary. This commercial
paper was issued by SIV Portfolio plc (formerly known as Cheyne Finance plc) and Rhinebridge LLC,
two structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that entered into receivership during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2007 and failed to make payment at maturity. Due to the mortgage-related assets that they
hold, these entities have been exposed to adverse market conditions that have affected the value of
their collateral and their ability to access short-term funding. We purchased these investments in
the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and, at the time of purchase, each investment had a rating of A1+
by Standard and Poors and P-1 by Moodys, their highest ratings respectively. These investments
are no longer trading and have no readily determinable market value. We have reviewed current
investment ratings, valuation estimates of the underlying collateral, company specific news and
events, and general economic conditions in considering the fair value of these investments. In
estimating fair value, we used a valuation approach based on a liquidation of assets held by each
SIV and their subsequent distribution of cash. We utilized assessments of the underlying collateral
from multiple indicators of value, which were then discounted to reflect the expected timing of
disposition and market risks. Based on this assessment of fair value, as of October 31, 2007, we
recognized losses of $13.0 million related to these investments. Giving effect to these losses,
Cienas investment portfolio at October 31, 2007 included an estimated fair value of $33.9 million
in commercial paper issued by these entities. At April 30, 2008, commercial paper issued by these
entities had a carrying value of $25.6 million, with the reduction reflecting the aggregate cash
proceeds received from these SIVs during the six-month period. There were no other changes relating
to these investments or other events during the six months ended April 30, 2008 that resulted in a
change in the carrying value of these investments.
As of April 30, 2008, our minority investments in privately held technology companies,
reported in other assets, were $6.7 million. These investments are generally carried at cost
because we own less than 20% of the voting equity and do not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over any of these companies. These investments are inherently high risk. The
markets for technologies or products manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the
time of our investment and such markets may never materialize or become significant. We could lose
our entire investment in some or all of these companies. We monitor these investments for
impairment and make appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary. If market conditions,
the expected financial performance, or the competitive position of the companies in which we invest
deteriorate, we may be required to record a charge in future periods due to impairment in their
value.
44
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
As of April 30, 2008, we have recorded a valuation allowance fully offsetting our gross
deferred tax assets of $1.2 billion. We calculated the valuation allowance in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both
positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets, when
measuring the need for a valuation allowance. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining net
deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and
estimates related to projections of profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net
operating loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methodologies and tax planning
strategies. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient
positive evidence exists to support the reversal. Because evidence such as our operating results
during the most recent three-year period is afforded more weight than forecasted results for future
periods, our cumulative loss during this three-year period represents sufficient negative evidence
regarding the need for a full valuation allowance under SFAS 109. We will release this valuation
allowance when management determines that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets
will be realized. Any release of valuation allowance will be recorded as a tax benefit increasing
net income, an adjustment to acquisition intangibles, or an adjustment to paid-in capital. We
believe it is likely that we will release all, or a significant portion of this
valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, although the exact timing is subject to
change based on the level of profitability that we are able to achieve for the remainder of fiscal
2008 and our visibility into future period results. We expect that a significant portion of the
release of the valuation allowance will be recorded as an income tax benefit at the time of
release, significantly increasing our reported net income. For the first six months of fiscal 2008,
a $1.3 million adjustment to acquisition intangibles was related to the release of valuation
allowance associated with the recognition of deferred tax assets from prior acquisitions. Because
we expect our recorded tax rate to increase in subsequent periods following a release of the
valuation allowance, our net income would be affected in periods following the release. Any
valuation allowance release will not affect the amount of cash paid for income taxes.
Warranty
Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $33.6 million
and $35.8 million as of October 31, 2007 and April 30, 2008, respectively. Our products are
generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to five years. We accrue for warranty
costs as part of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor
costs, and associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends
in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the
equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends and the
cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The provision for product warranties
was $7.1 million and $7.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 and 2008 respectively. The
provision for warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly basis depending upon the mix of products
and customers in that period. If actual product failure rates, material replacement costs, service
or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty provision would be
required. An increase in warranty claims or the related costs associated with satisfying these
warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and negatively affect our gross margin.
Uncertain Tax Positions
Effective at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008, we adopted FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which is a change in
accounting for income taxes. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight
of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained
on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized
upon settlement. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we reduced the liability for net
unrecognized tax benefits by $0.1 million, and accounted for the reduction as a cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle that resulted in an increase to retained earnings of $0.1
million and a decrease to income tax payable of $0.1 million. As of April 30, 2008, we had
approximately $6.1 million recorded as other long-term obligations on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN 48. Significant judgment is
required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes.
Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax
outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical
income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent
that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such
differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is
made. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and changes to
reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.
45
Loss Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. We consider the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate
the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. A loss is accrued when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly
evaluate current information available to us to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted
and whether new accruals are required.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. We maintain a short-term and long-term investment portfolio. See
Note 5 to the financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information relating to
the fair value of these investments. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest
rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were
to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels at April 30, 2008, the fair value of the
portfolio would decline by approximately $4.3 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. Because our sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, the
impact of foreign currency fluctuations on sales has not been material. Our primary exposures are
related to non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Canada, Europe, India and China. During
the first six months of fiscal 2008, approximately 79.3% of our operating expense was U.S. dollar
denominated. As of April 30, 2008, our assets and liabilities related to non-dollar denominated
currencies were primarily related to intercompany payables and receivables. We do not expect an
increase or decrease of 10% in the foreign exchange rate would have a material impact on our
financial position. To date, we have not significantly hedged against foreign currency
fluctuations. Should exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency become more significant, however,
we may pursue hedging alternatives.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Ciena carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of Cienas management, including Cienas Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Cienas disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon
this evaluation, Cienas Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Cienas
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We completed our acquisition of World Wide Packets on March 3, 2008. We have incorporated the
operations of World Wide Packets within our existing control environment and have expanded the
scope of a number of our internal processes and controls to include these operations. We intend to
include the operations of World Wide Packets within the scope of our assessment of internal control
over financial reporting as of October 31, 2008. We do not expect this acquisition to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
There was no change in Cienas internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Cienas internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As a result
of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., we became a defendant in a securities class
action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in
August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers and certain underwriters of
ONIs initial public offering (IPO) as defendants and alleges, among other things, that the
underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation
arrangements in ONIs registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to
artificially inflate the ONIs stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and
the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters
alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been
dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than
300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions
have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. A description of this litigation and the
history of the proceedings can be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings of Part I of Cienas Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 27, 2007. No
specific amount of damages has been claimed in this action. On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs
filed second amended complaints against the defendants in six focus cases selected from the
consolidated cases (which cases do not include Ciena), as well as a set of amended master
allegations against the other issuer defendants. On September 27, 2007, the plaintiffs filed
a motion for class certification based on their amended complaints and allegations, which
motion is still pending. On November 12, 2007, the defendants in the six focus cases moved
to dismiss the amended complaints, which motion was denied by the district court on
March 26, 2008. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot
accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter at this time.
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC
filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against
Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain of the
parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673. The complaint, which has not yet been served
upon Ciena, seeks injunctive relief and damages. We believe that we have valid defenses to the
lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously.
46
We are also subject to various legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will
have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other
information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before
investing in our securities.
A small number of communications service provider customers account for a significant portion of
our revenue, and the loss of any of these customers, or a significant reduction in their spending,
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a relatively small number of
customers. Five customers collectively accounted for 65.3% of our fiscal 2007 revenue. For the
first six months of fiscal 2008, we had three customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of
our revenue and together represented 50.4%. Consequently, our financial results are closely
correlated with the spending of a relatively small number of customers. Because their spending may
be unpredictable, sporadic and subject to unanticipated changes, our revenue and operating results
can fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Reliance upon a relatively small number of customers increases
our exposure to changes in their network strategy, changes in executive leadership and postponement
or reduction of customers capital expenditures. The loss of, or significant reductions in spending by, one or more of our
large customers would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Moreover, because our largest customers are telecommunications service
providers, our business could be exposed to risks associated with a market-wide change in business
prospects, competitive pressures or other conditions affecting these carriers.
Our concentration in revenue among a relatively small number of customers has increased, in
part, as a result of consolidations among a number of our largest customers. These consolidations
have resulted in increased concentration of customer purchasing power, which in turn may lead to
constraints on pricing, increases in costs to meet demands of large customers and pressure to
accept onerous contract terms. Consolidations may also increase the likelihood of temporary or
indefinite reductions in customer spending or changes in network strategy that could harm our
business and operating results.
Our revenue, gross margin and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to
quarter.
Our revenue, gross margin and results of operations can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter
to quarter. Our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future
revenue and gross margin and substantial adjustments to expenses are difficult and take time.
Uncertainty or lack of visibility into customer spending and changes in economic or market
conditions can make it difficult to prepare reliable estimates of future revenue. Consequently, our
levels of inventory and operating expense may be high relative to our revenue. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in our revenue, gross margin and operating results include:
|
|
|
variations in the mix between higher and lower margin products and services; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and size of orders from customers, including the impact of, and our ability
to recognize revenue from, significant customer contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the level of pricing pressure we encounter; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customers requirements, including changes or cancellations to orders from
customers; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new products by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the price or availability of components for our products; |
|
|
|
|
readiness of customer sites for installation and delays in network deployment; |
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions as well as those specific to our markets. |
47
Many factors are beyond our control, particularly in the case of large carrier orders
and multi-vendor or multi-technology network infrastructure builds where the achievement of certain performance
thresholds for acceptance is subject to the readiness and performance of the customer or other
providers, and changes in customer requirements or installation plans. Any one or a combination of
these factors may cause our revenue, gross margin and operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter.
As a consequence, our results for a particular quarter may be difficult to predict, and our prior
results are not necessarily indicative of results likely in future periods. The factors above may
cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors,
which may cause our stock price to decline.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and profitability.
The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are
extremely competitive, particularly the market for sales to communications service providers.
Competition in these markets is based on any one or a combination of the following factors: price,
product features and functionality, manufacturing capability and lead-times, incumbency and
existing business relationships, scalability and the ability of products to meet the immediate and
future network requirements of customers. A small number of very large companies have historically
dominated our industry. These competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and
marketing resources, greater manufacturing capacity and better established relationships with
telecommunications carriers and other potential customers than we do. Consolidation activity among
large networking equipment providers has caused some of our competitors to grow even larger, which
may increase their strategic advantages. These transactions may adversely affect our competitive
position.
We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a
specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market. These competitors often base
their products on the latest available technologies. Due to the narrower focus of their efforts,
these competitors may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly and may be
more attractive to customers.
Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:
|
|
|
one-stop shopping options; |
|
|
|
|
significant price competition, particularly from competitors in Asia; |
|
|
|
|
customer financing assistance; |
|
|
|
|
early announcements of competing products and extensive marketing efforts; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering equity ownership positions to customers; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering to repurchase our equipment from existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising assistance; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property assertions and disputes. |
The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated base
of potential customers such as communications service providers. If we fail to compete successfully
in our markets, our sales and profitability would suffer.
Investment of research and development resources in technologies for which there is not a matching
market opportunity, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is
market demand, would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
The market for communications networking equipment is characterized by rapidly evolving
technologies and changes in market demand. To support the growth of our business, we continually
invest in research and development to enhance our existing products, create new products and
develop or acquire new technologies. There is often a lengthy period between commencing these
development initiatives and bringing the new or revised product to market, and, during this time,
technology or the market may move in directions we had not anticipated. Even if we are able to
anticipate market conditions and develop and introduce new products or enhancements, there is no
guarantee that these products will achieve market acceptance. There is a significant possibility,
therefore, that some of our development decisions will not turn out as anticipated, and that our
investment in some projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we may miss a
market opportunity because we fail to invest, or invest too late, in a new product or an
enhancement of an existing product that could have been highly profitable. Changes in the market
may also cause us to discontinue previously planned investments in products, which can have a
disruptive effect on relationships with customers who were anticipating the
availability of a new product or feature. If we fail to make the right investments or fail to
make them at the right time, our competitive position may suffer and our revenue and profitability
could be harmed.
48
Network equipment sales to large communications service providers often involve lengthy sales
cycles and protracted contract negotiations and may require us to assume terms or conditions that
negatively affect our pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition.
Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and expand our sales
to large communications service providers. These sales typically involve lengthy sales cycles,
protracted, and sometimes difficult, contract negotiations, and extensive product testing and
network certification. We are sometimes required to agree to contract terms or conditions that
negatively affect pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition in order to
consummate a sale. These terms may, in turn, negatively affect our revenue and results of
operations and increase our susceptibility to quarterly fluctuations in our results. Communications
service providers may ultimately insist upon terms and conditions that we deem too onerous or not
in our best interest. Moreover, our purchase agreements generally do not require that a customer
guarantee any minimum purchase level and customers often have the right to modify, delay, reduce or
cancel previous orders. As a result, we may incur substantial expense and devote time and resources
to potential relationships that never materialize or result in lower than anticipated sales.
Growth of our business could be adversely affected if improved conditions in our markets do not
continue or if general economic conditions further weaken.
We have experienced considerable annual revenue growth in recent fiscal years, in part due to
improved conditions in our markets. Our business has benefited from increases in the amount of
voice, video and data traffic transmitted over communications networks and spending by carriers to
address capacity needs and offer additional consumer and enterprise services over more efficient,
economical network architectures. It is not certain that these improved market conditions will
continue and unfavorable macroeconomic conditions, particularly in the United States, could result
in reduced customer capital spending and slower revenue growth in future periods. Economic
weakness, customer financial difficulties and constrained spending on communications networks have
previously resulted in decreased demand for our products, and these conditions could materially
adversely affect our business and results of operations in the future.
We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale
of complementary products or technology of other companies.
We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute their
products or technology. We rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or
technologies or to fulfill an element of our product portfolio. As part of our strategy to
diversify our product portfolio and customer base, we may enter into additional original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) or resale agreements in the future. We may incur unanticipated costs or
difficulties relating to our resale of third party products. Our third party relationships could
expose us to risks associated with delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of
products or technology. We may also be required by customers to assume warranty, service and other
commercial obligations greater than the commitments, if any, made to us by these technology
partners. Some of our strategic partners are relatively small companies with limited financial
resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to
expend our own resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to the risks above could harm our
reputation with key customers and negatively affect our business and our results of operations.
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results
of operations.
The development and production of equipment that addresses rapidly growing, multi-service
communications network traffic is complicated. Some of our products can be fully tested only when
deployed in communications networks or with other equipment and
therefore may contain undetected hardware or software errors at the time of release. As a result, product performance problems are often more
acute for initial deployments of new products and product enhancements. Unanticipated problems can
relate to the design, manufacturing, installation or integration of our products. If we experience
significant performance, reliability or quality problems with our products, or our customers suffer
significant network restoration delays relating to these problems, a number of negative effects on
our business could result, including:
|
|
|
increased costs to address software or hardware defects; |
|
|
|
|
payment of liquidated damages or claims for damages for performance failures or delays; |
|
|
|
|
increased inventory obsolescence and warranty expense; |
|
|
|
|
delays in collecting accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
cancellation or reduction in orders from customers; and |
|
|
|
|
damage to our reputation or legal actions by customers or end users. |
49
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our
business and results of operations.
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory
purchase practices, the convergence of our product lines and our supplier transitions.
To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our
contract manufacturers and suppliers to manufacture components and complete assemblies based on
forecasts of customer demand. As a result, our inventory purchases expose us to the risk that our
customers either will not order the products we have forecasted or will purchase fewer products
than forecasted. Our purchase agreements generally do not require that a customer guarantee any
minimum purchase level, and customers often have the right to modify, reduce or cancel purchase
quantities. As a result, we may purchase inventory based on forecasted sales and in anticipation of
sales that never occur. Historically, our inventory write-offs have resulted from the circumstances
above. As features and functionalities converge across our product lines, however, we face an
increased risk that customers may elect to forego purchases of one product we have inventoried in
favor of purchasing another product with similar functionality or application. We may be exposed to
write-offs due to significant inventory purchases that we deem necessary as we transition from one
supplier to another, or resulting from a suppliers decision to discontinue the manufacture of
certain components. We may also be required to write off inventory as a result of the effect of
evolving domestic and international environmental regulations limiting the use of certain
materials. If we are required to write off or write down a significant amount of inventory due to
the factors above or otherwise, our results of operations for the period would be materially
adversely affected.
Shortages in component supply or manufacturing capacity could increase our costs, adversely affect
our results of operations and constrain our ability to grow our business.
As we have expanded our use of contract manufacturers, broadened our product portfolio and
increased sales volume in recent years, manufacturing capacity and supply constraints have become
increasingly significant issues for us. We have encountered component shortages that have affected
our operations and ability to deliver products in a timely manner. Growth in customer demand for
the communications networking products supplied by us, our competitors and other third parties, has
resulted in supply constraints among providers of some components used in our products. In
addition, environmental regulations, such as RoHS, have resulted in, and may continue to give rise
to, increased demand for compliant components. As a result, we may experience delays or difficulty
obtaining compliant components from suppliers. Component shortages and manufacturing capacity
constraints may also arise, or be exacerbated by difficulties with our suppliers or contract
manufacturers, or our failure to adequately forecast our component or manufacturing needs. If
shortages or delays occur or persist, the price of required components may increase, or the
components may not be available at all. If we are unable to secure the components or subsystems
that we require at reasonable prices, or are unable to secure adequate manufacturing capacity, we
may experience delivery delays and may be unable to satisfy our contractual obligations to
customers. These delays may cause us to incur liquidated damages to customers and negatively affect
our revenue and gross margin. Shortages in component supply or manufacturing capacity could also
limit our opportunities to pursue additional growth or revenue opportunities and could harm our
business reputation and customer relationships.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new
sales channels.
We continue to take steps to sell our expanded product portfolio into new geographic markets
and to a broader customer base, including other large telecommunications service providers,
enterprises, cable operators, wireless operators and federal, state and local governments. We have
less experience in these markets and believe, in order to succeed in these markets, we must develop
and manage new sales channels and distribution arrangements. We expect these relationships to be an
increasingly important part of the growth of our business and our efforts to increase revenue. We
may not be successful in reaching additional customer segments or expanding into new geographic
regions and may be exposed to increased expense and business and financial risks associated with
entering new markets and pursuing new customer segments. We may expend time, money and other
resources on channel relationships that are ultimately unsuccessful. In addition, sales to federal,
state and local governments require compliance with complex procurement regulations with which we
have little experience. We may be unable to increase our sales to government contractors if we
determine that we cannot comply with applicable regulations. Our failure to comply with regulations
for existing contracts could result in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings involving
fines and suspension, or exclusion from participation in federal government contracts. Failure to
manage additional sales channels effectively would limit our ability to succeed in these new
markets and could adversely
affect our ability to grow our customer base and revenue.
50
We may experience delays in the development and enhancement of our products that may negatively
affect our competitive position and business.
Our products are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in
developing, improving, manufacturing or deploying them. Each step in the development life cycle of
our products presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could decrease
the timing and cost-effective development of such products and could affect customer acceptance of
such products. Intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements, and other
execution risks may delay or even prevent the introduction of these products. Modification of
research and development strategies and changes in allocation of resources could also be disruptive
to our development efforts. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely
manner, our competitive position may suffer and our business, financial condition and results of
operations would be harmed.
We must manage our relationships with contract manufacturers effectively to ensure that our
manufacturing and production requirements are met.
We rely on contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing operations for
our products and components, and we are increasingly utilizing overseas suppliers, particularly in
Asia. The qualification of our contract manufacturers is a costly and time-consuming process, and
these manufacturers build products for other companies, including our competitors. We are
constantly reviewing our manufacturing capability, including the work of our contract
manufacturers, to ensure that our production requirements are met in terms of cost, capacity,
quality and reliability. From time to time, we may decide to transfer the manufacturing of a
product from one contract manufacturer to another, to better meet our production needs. Efforts to
transfer to a new contract manufacturer or consolidate our use of suppliers may result in temporary
increases in inventory volumes purchased in order to ensure continued supply. We may not
effectively manage these contract manufacturer transitions, and our new contract manufacturers may
not perform as well as expected. Our reliance upon contract manufacturers could also expose us to
risks that could harm our business related to difficulties with lead times, on-time delivery,
quality assurance and product changes required to meet evolving environmental standards and
regulations. These risks can result in strategic harm to our business, including delays affecting
our time to market for new or enhanced products. In addition, we do not have contracts in place
with some of these providers and do not have guaranteed supply of components or manufacturing
capacity. Our inability to effectively manage our relationships with our contract manufacturers,
particularly overseas, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
We depend on sole and limited source suppliers for some of our product components and the loss of a
source, or a lack of availability of key components, could increase our costs and harm our customer
relationships.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for our product components and subsystems, as well
as for equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include several components
for which reliable, high-volume suppliers are particularly limited. Some key optical and electronic
components we use in our products are currently available only from sole or limited sources. As a
result of this concentration in our supply chain, particularly for optical components, our business
would be negatively affected if our suppliers were to experience any significant disruption in
their operations affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of components.
Concentration in our supply chain can exacerbate our exposure to risks associated with vendors
discontinuing the manufacture of certain components for our products. The loss of a source of
supply, or lack of sufficient availability of key components, could require us to redesign products
that use those components, which would increase our costs and negatively affect our product gross
margin. The partial or complete loss of a sole or limited source supplier could result in lost
revenue, added costs and deployment delays that could harm our business and customer relationships.
Our failure to manage effectively our relationships with service delivery partners could adversely
impact our financial results and relationship with customers.
We rely on a number of service delivery partners, both domestic and international, to
complement our global service and support resources. We rely upon third party service delivery
partners for the installation of our equipment in some large network builds. These projects often
include onerous customization, installation, testing and acceptance terms. In order to ensure the
proper installation and maintenance of our products, we must identify, train and certify our
service partners. The certification of these partners can be costly and time-consuming, and these
partners provide similar services for other companies, including our competitors. We may not be
able to effectively manage our relationships with our service partners and cannot be certain that
they will be able to deliver services in the manner or time required. If our service partners are
unsuccessful in delivering services:
|
|
|
we may suffer delays in recognizing revenue; |
|
|
|
|
our services revenue and gross margin may be adversely affected; and |
|
|
|
|
our relationship with customers could suffer. |
51
Difficulties with service delivery partners could cause us to transition a larger share of
deployment and other services from third parties to internal resources, thereby increasing our
service overhead costs and negatively affecting our services gross margin and results of
operations.
We may incur significant costs as a result of our efforts to protect and enforce our intellectual
property rights or respond to claims of infringement from others.
Our business is dependent upon the successful protection of our proprietary technology and
intellectual property. We are subject to the risk that unauthorized parties may attempt to access,
copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology, particularly as we expand our product
development into India and increase our reliance upon contract manufacturers in Asia. These and
other international operations could expose us to a lower level of intellectual property protection
than in the United States. Monitoring unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and we
cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of
unauthorized use. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete effectively
could be harmed.
In recent years, we have filed suit to enforce our intellectual property rights. From time to
time we have also been subject to litigation and other third party intellectual property claims,
including as a result of our indemnification obligations to customers or resellers that purchase
our products. The frequency of these assertions is increasing as patent holders, including entities
that are not in our industry and that purchase patents as an investment, use infringement
assertions as a competitive tactic or as a source of additional revenue. Intellectual property
claims can significantly divert the time and attention of our personnel and result in costly
litigation. Intellectual property infringement claims can also require us to pay substantial
damages or royalties, enter into costly license agreements or develop non-infringing technology.
Accordingly, the costs associated with third party intellectual property claims could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our international operations could expose us to additional risks and result in increased operating
expense.
We market, sell and service our products globally. We have established offices around the
world, including in North America, Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. We have also
established a major development center in India and are increasingly relying upon overseas
suppliers, particularly in Asia, for sourcing of components and contract manufacturing of our
products. We expect that our international activities will be dynamic in the near term, and we may
enter new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others. These changes to our
international operations may require significant management attention and result in additional
expense. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships
with local partners. Our inability to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory
arrangements for international sales of our products could impact our ability to maintain or
increase international market demand for our products.
International operations are subject to inherent risks, including:
|
|
|
effects of changes in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of economic changes in countries outside the United States; |
|
|
|
|
less protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax and customs consequences, particularly as related to transfer-pricing issues; |
|
|
|
|
social, political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures, export compliance, qualification to transact business and
other regulatory requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters and epidemics. |
52
These and other factors related to our international operations may result in increased risk
to our business and could give rise to unanticipated expense or other effects that could adversely
affect our financial results.
Our use and reliance upon development resources in India may expose us to unanticipated costs or
liabilities.
We have established a development center in India and continue to increase hiring of personnel
for this facility. There is no assurance that our reliance upon development resources in India will
enable us to achieve meaningful cost reductions or greater resource efficiency. Further, our
development efforts and other operations in India involve significant risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty hiring and retaining appropriate engineering resources due to intense
competition for such resources and resulting wage inflation; |
|
|
|
|
the knowledge transfer related to our technology and exposure to misappropriation of
intellectual property or confidential information, including information that is
proprietary to us, our customers and other third parties; |
|
|
|
|
heightened exposure to changes in the economic, security and political conditions of India; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuation in currency exchange rates and tax risks associated with international
operations; and |
|
|
|
|
development efforts that do not meet our requirements because of language, cultural or
other differences associated with international operations, resulting in errors or delays. |
Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks related to our operations in
India could expose us to increased expense, impair our development efforts, harm our competitive
position and damage our reputation.
We may encounter difficulty integrating World Wide Packets and may not be able to achieve the
benefits we anticipate from our merger.
We recently completed our acquisition of World Wide Packets and are in the process of
integrating its operations, systems, technologies, products, and personnel. Integration of acquired
companies can be complex and exposes us to a variety of risks, including the possible loss of key
personnel, disruption of product development efforts, difficulties with new suppliers, loss of
customers and incorporation of financial reporting processes and related information systems.
Moreover, World Wide Packets customers have included our competitors, some of whom are strategic
partners that resell World Wide Packets products. There is no assurance that these companies will
remain customers. In addition to these risks, we may ultimately be unable to
achieve the strategic benefits we anticipate from this transaction and could be exposed to
additional risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. For example, under the merger we are assuming all known and unknown
liabilities of World Wide Packets. These liabilities may include liabilities to shareholders,
customers, suppliers or employees, as well as liabilities related to intellectual property
disputes. Difficulties relating to our integration efforts, and exposure to additional liabilities
or operational risks stemming from our merger with World Wide Packets, may make it difficult for us
to achieve the benefits we anticipate from this merger.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect
receivables and could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
In the course of our sales to customers, we may have difficulty collecting receivables and
could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts. We may be exposed to similar
risks relating to third party resellers and other sales channel partners. While we monitor these
situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate measures to protect ourselves, it is possible
that we may have to write down or write off doubtful accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs could
negatively affect our operating results for the period in which they occur, and, if large, could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.
Over the last several years, we have taken steps, including reductions in force, office
closures, and internal reorganizations to reduce the size and cost of our operations and to better
match our resources with market opportunities. We may take similar steps in the future. These
changes could be disruptive to our business and may result in the recording of accounting charges,
including inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs and charges
relating to consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial charges resulting from any future
restructuring activities could adversely affect our results of operations in the period in
which we take such a charge.
53
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business
effectively.
Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical and other personnel with experience
in our industry is increasing in intensity, and our employees have been the subject of targeted
hiring by our competitors. We may experience difficulty
retaining and motivating existing employees and attracting qualified personnel to fill key
positions. In particular, we are expanding our engineering resources in the U.S. and abroad and may
find it difficult to attract and retain sufficiently skilled personnel in some markets. In
addition, none of our executive officers is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term.
It may be difficult to replace members of our management team or other key personnel, and the loss
of such individuals could be disruptive to our business. Because we generally do not have
employment contracts with our employees, we must rely upon providing competitive compensation
packages and a high-quality work environment in order to retain and motivate employees. If we are
unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business
effectively.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
To date, we have not significantly hedged against foreign currency fluctuations. Historically,
our primary exposure to currency exchange rates has been related to non-U.S. dollar denominated
operating expense in Europe, Asia and Canada where we sell primarily in U.S. dollars. With the
growth of our international headcount, we have witnessed increases in operating expense resulting
from the weakening of the U.S. dollar. We expect these risks to continue as we further increase
headcount in India.
As we increase our international sales and utilization of international suppliers, we may
transact additional business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, we would be
subject to the possibility of greater effects of foreign exchange translation on our financial
statements. For those countries outside the United States where we have significant sales, a
devaluation in the local currency would make our products more expensive for customers to purchase
or increase our operating costs, thereby adversely affecting our competitiveness. There can be no
assurance that exchange rate fluctuations in the future will not have a material adverse effect on
our revenue from international sales and, consequently, our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties and our
business would be adversely affected if this technology was no longer available to us on
commercially reasonable terms.
We integrate third-party software and other technology into our products. Licenses for this
technology may not be available or continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms.
Third party licensors may insist on unreasonable financial or other terms in connection with our
use of such technology. Difficulties with third party technology licensors could require us to
obtain or develop a substitute technology which may disrupt development of our products or increase
the cost of developing and selling our products, which could harm our business.
Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and
information systems and modifications may disrupt our business, operating processes and internal
controls.
The successful operation of various internal business processes and information systems is
critical to the efficient operation of our business. In recent years, we have experienced
considerable growth in transaction volume, headcount and reliance upon international resources in
our operations. Our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to
support continued growth. To improve the efficiency of our operations, achieve greater automation
and support our growth, we are in the process of implementing a number of business process
improvements across our company and have recently implemented a new version of our Oracle
management information system. Significant changes to our processes
and systems expose us to a number of operational risks. These changes
may be costly and disruptive, and could impose substantial demands on management time. These changes may also require the modification of a number
of internal control procedures. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar problems with our
business processes or information systems, or the transition to new processes and systems, could
have a negative effect on the operation of our business and our results of operations.
Strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.
54
We may acquire or make strategic investments in other companies to expand the markets we
address and diversify our customer base. We may also engage in these transactions to acquire or
accelerate the development of technology or products. To do so, we may use cash, issue equity that
would dilute our current shareholders ownership, incur debt or assume indebtedness. These
transactions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty integrating the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty completing projects of the acquired company and costs related to in-process
projects; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees of the acquired company; |
|
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to intangible assets and charges associated with
impairment of goodwill; |
|
|
|
|
ineffective internal controls over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on unfamiliar supply partners; and |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement claims. |
As a result of these and other risks, any acquisitions or strategic investments may not reap
the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of
operation and financial condition.
We may be required to take further write-downs of goodwill and other intangible assets.
As of April 30, 2008, we had $455.1 million of goodwill on our balance sheet. This amount
primarily represents the remaining excess of the total purchase price of our acquisitions over the
fair value of the net assets acquired. This amount includes $223.1 million of goodwill relating to
our acquisition of World Wide Packets in March 2008. At April 30, 2008, we had $113.4 million of
other intangible assets on our balance sheet. The amount primarily reflects purchased technology
from our acquisitions, including World Wide Packets. At April 30, 2008, goodwill and other
intangible assets represented approximately 27.7% of our total assets. We have previously incurred
charges relating to impairment of goodwill other intangible assets. If we are required to record
additional impairment charges, such charges would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or
increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment charge,
our operating results could be materially adversely affected in such period.
Changes in government regulation affecting our business or markets, or those of our customers,
could harm our prospects and operating results.
The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications
industry and similar agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other
countries. Many of our most important customers are subject to the rules and regulations of these
agencies. Changes in regulatory requirements in the United States or other countries could inhibit
service providers from investing in their communications network infrastructures or introducing new
services. These changes could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Changes in
regulatory tariff requirements or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on
communications networks could slow the expansion of network infrastructures and adversely affect
our business, operating results, and financial condition.
In addition, our operations may be negatively affected by environmental regulations, such as
the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain
Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) that have been adopted by the
European Union. Compliance with these and similar environmental regulations, including changes or
interpretations of such regulations, may increase our cost of building and selling our products,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
The investment of our substantial cash balance and our investments in marketable debt securities
are subject to risks which may cause losses and affect the liquidity of these investments.
55
At April 30, 2008, we had $963.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $95.4 million in
investments in marketable debt securities. We have historically invested these amounts in corporate
bonds, asset-backed obligations, commercial paper, securities issued by the United States,
certificates of deposit and money market funds meeting certain criteria. These investments are
subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks, which may be exacerbated by
U.S. sub-prime mortgage defaults that have affected various sectors of the financial markets and
caused credit and liquidity issues. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we determined that
declines in the fair value of certain of our investments in commercial paper issued by two
structured investment vehicles (SIVs) were other-than-temporary. Each of these SIVs entered
receivership during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 and subsequently failed to make payment at
maturity. We recognized losses of $13.0 million related to these investments during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2007 and these investments have a carrying value of $25.6 million at April 30,
2008. We may recognize further losses in the fair value of these investments or a complete loss of
these investments. Additional losses would have a negative effect on our net income. Information
and the markets relating to investments that hold mortgage-related assets as collateral remain
dynamic. There may be further declines in the value of these investments and the value of the
collateral held by these entities. As a result, we may experience a reduction in value or loss of
liquidity of other investments. In addition, should our other investments cease paying or reduce
the amount of interest paid to us, our interest income would suffer. These market risks associated
with our investment portfolio may have a negative adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity and financial condition.
56
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a
report containing managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such
internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely
to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources.
Growth of our business, including our broader product portfolio and increased transaction volume,
will necessitate ongoing changes to our internal control systems, processes and information
systems. We are actively engaged in updating or reengineering certain important business processes
to address the growth of our operations and to improve efficiency. Our increasingly global
operations, including our development facility in India and offices abroad, pose additional
challenges to our internal control systems as their operations become more significant. Each of
these changes to our operations and our processes creates additional business risks. We cannot be
certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting will be sufficient to
enable management or our independent registered public accounting firm to determine that our
internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we or our independent
registered public accounting firms are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial
reporting are effective, our business may be harmed. Market perception of our financial condition
and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer perception of our
business may suffer.
Obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness on our convertible notes may adversely
affect our business.
At April 30, 2008, indebtedness on our outstanding convertible notes totaled $800.0 million in
aggregate principal. Our indebtedness and repayment obligations could have important negative
consequences, including:
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the availability of cash resources for other purposes, including capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the markets in which we compete; and |
|
|
|
|
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to competitors that have better
access to capital resources. |
We may also add additional indebtedness such as equipment loans, working capital lines of
credit and other long term debt.
Our stock price is volatile.
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain
volatile in the future. Volatility can arise as a result of a number of the factors discussed in
this Risk Factors section, as well as divergence between our actual or anticipated financial
results and published expectations of analysts, and announcements that we, our competitors, or our
customers may make.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
57
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Cienas annual meeting of shareholders was held on March 26, 2008. At the annual meeting,
Ciena shareholders approved the proposals and elected the directors as set forth below by the votes
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
1. |
|
|
Election to the Board of
Directors of three Class
II Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvey B. Cash |
|
|
72,666,964 |
|
|
|
4,246,408 |
|
|
|
736,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Judith M. OBrien |
|
|
75,125,529 |
|
|
|
1,791,154 |
|
|
|
732,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
75,489,943 |
|
|
|
1,429,983 |
|
|
|
729,524 |
|
Each director nominee above was elected by the vote of the majority of the votes
cast by shareholders, in accordance with our bylaws. In addition, the following directors continued to hold office after the annual
meeting: Stephen P. Bradley, Bruce L. Claflin, Gerald H. Taylor, Lawton W. Fitt, Patrick H.
Nettles and Michael J. Rowny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-votes |
|
2. |
|
|
Approval of the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan |
|
|
57,592,366 |
|
|
|
4,833,826 |
|
|
|
884,638 |
|
|
|
14,338,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
3. |
|
|
Approval of the amendment
and restatement of
Cienas Third Restated
Certificate of
Incorporation, as
amended, to increase the
number of authorized
shares of common stock
from 140 million to 290
million and to make
certain other changes |
|
|
62,618,936 |
|
|
|
14,335,896 |
|
|
|
694,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
4. |
|
|
Ratification
of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Cienas independent
registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year
ending October 31, 2008. |
|
|
76,083,853 |
|
|
|
862,258 |
|
|
|
703,339 |
|
The amendment and restatement of the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation was approved
by the required affirmative vote of a majority of the shares outstanding. The 2008 Omnibus
Incentive Plan and ratification the appointment of our independent registered public accounting
firm were each approved by the required affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by
shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes counted as Against votes for purposes
of approving the amendment and restatement of our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation, but
had not effect on the other proposals.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
58
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
3.1(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ciena Corporation |
|
|
|
10.1(1)
|
|
Ciena Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan* |
|
|
|
10.2(1)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Ciena Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan* |
|
|
|
10.3(1)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Ciena Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan* |
|
|
|
10.4(2)
|
|
World Wide Packets, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended* |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Cienas Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2008 |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Cienas Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March
4, 2008 |
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIENA CORPORATION
|
|
Date: June 6, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 6, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
|
|
|
James E. Moylan, Jr. |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
60