e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-3156479
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, MA 01803
(Address of principal
executive office)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
781-565-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act of
1934). Yes o No þ
176,390,889 shares of the registrants Common Stock,
$0.001 par value, were outstanding as of April 30,
2007.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INDEX
1
Part I.
Financial Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share and per
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
89,204
|
|
|
$
|
112,334
|
|
Accounts receivable, less
allowances of $18,364 and $20,207, respectively
|
|
|
117,267
|
|
|
|
110,778
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts
receivable
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
19,748
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
14,589
|
|
|
|
13,245
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
235,259
|
|
|
|
263,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
31,755
|
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
750,835
|
|
|
|
699,333
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
230,490
|
|
|
|
220,040
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
25,818
|
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,274,157
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
and obligations under capital leases
|
|
$
|
4,310
|
|
|
$
|
3,953
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
32,886
|
|
|
|
27,768
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
57,228
|
|
|
|
52,674
|
|
Current portion of accrued business
combination costs
|
|
|
13,582
|
|
|
|
14,810
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
|
64,660
|
|
|
|
63,269
|
|
Unearned revenue and customer
deposits
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
204,545
|
|
|
|
212,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and obligations
under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
|
348,703
|
|
|
|
349,990
|
|
Accrued business combination costs,
net of current portion
|
|
|
40,286
|
|
|
|
45,255
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue, net
of current portion
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
31,064
|
|
|
|
19,926
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
22,683
|
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
658,843
|
|
|
|
658,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock,
$0.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
3,562,238 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation
preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par
value; 560,000,000 shares authorized; 178,023,654 and
173,182,430 shares issued and 174,895,599 and
170,152,247 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
814,336
|
|
|
|
773,120
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,128,055
and 3,030,183 shares, respectively)
|
|
|
(14,323
|
)
|
|
|
(12,859
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(193,090
|
)
|
|
|
(190,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
615,314
|
|
|
|
576,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,274,157
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
2
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
70,324
|
|
|
$
|
48,553
|
|
|
$
|
146,064
|
|
|
$
|
101,736
|
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
32,842
|
|
|
|
15,405
|
|
|
|
60,807
|
|
|
|
29,971
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
28,896
|
|
|
|
7,770
|
|
|
|
58,612
|
|
|
|
15,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
132,062
|
|
|
|
71,728
|
|
|
|
265,483
|
|
|
|
147,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
4,755
|
|
|
|
22,287
|
|
|
|
9,737
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
22,567
|
|
|
|
11,343
|
|
|
|
43,120
|
|
|
|
22,134
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
13,538
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
5,842
|
|
|
|
4,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
44,158
|
|
|
|
20,222
|
|
|
|
84,787
|
|
|
|
40,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
87,904
|
|
|
|
51,506
|
|
|
|
180,696
|
|
|
|
106,921
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
17,575
|
|
|
|
12,902
|
|
|
|
34,087
|
|
|
|
25,059
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
41,861
|
|
|
|
25,351
|
|
|
|
85,721
|
|
|
|
53,684
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,540
|
|
|
|
10,906
|
|
|
|
32,925
|
|
|
|
25,553
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
10,266
|
|
|
|
3,984
|
|
Restructuring and other charges,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
82,092
|
|
|
|
49,843
|
|
|
|
162,999
|
|
|
|
106,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
5,812
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
17,697
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
(1,786
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
|
(2,964
|
)
|
|
|
(5,600
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
171,747
|
|
|
|
163,407
|
|
|
|
170,501
|
|
|
|
159,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
3
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,272
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and
equipment
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
3,429
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
16,108
|
|
|
|
8,935
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Share-based payments, including
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
20,954
|
|
|
|
9,645
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
Normalization of rent expense
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,314
|
|
|
|
(3,308
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(3,096
|
)
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(3,440
|
)
|
|
|
(10,131
|
)
|
Deferred maintenance revenue,
unearned revenue and customer deposits
|
|
|
8,031
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
61,346
|
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property
and equipment
|
|
|
(5,055
|
)
|
|
|
(3,930
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(59,087
|
)
|
|
|
(376,828
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of
marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,059
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,104
|
)
|
Payments for capitalized patent
defense costs
|
|
|
(3,399
|
)
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(66,867
|
)
|
|
|
(365,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of notes payable and
capital leases
|
|
|
(3,432
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
Deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
(18,650
|
)
|
|
|
(14,433
|
)
|
Proceeds from bank debt, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,032
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
Repurchase shares from former MVC
stockholders
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on other long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
(5,720
|
)
|
|
|
(5,643
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock under employee share-based payment plans
|
|
|
15,101
|
|
|
|
25,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(17,342
|
)
|
|
|
350,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(23,130
|
)
|
|
|
(1,507
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
112,334
|
|
|
|
71,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
89,204
|
|
|
$
|
70,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
13,084
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 784,266 shares of
common stock in connection with the acquisition of Mobile Voice
Control, Inc.
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
4
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. (the Company or
Nuance) offers businesses and consumers competitive
and value-added speech, dictation and imaging solutions that
facilitate the way people access, share, manage and use
information in business and daily life. The Company was
incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. In 1999, the Company
changed its name to ScanSoft, Inc., and changed its ticker
symbol to SSFT. In October 2005, the Company changed its name to
Nuance Communications, Inc. and changed its ticker symbol to
NUAN in November 2005.
On March 26, 2007, the Company acquired Bluestar Resources
Limited, the parent of Focus Enterprises Limited and Focus India
Private Limited (collectively Focus), a provider of
medical transcription services with operations in the United
States and India (Note 3).
On December 29, 2006, the Company acquired Mobile Voice
Control, Inc. (MVC), a provider of speech enabled
mobile search and messaging services headquartered in Mason,
Ohio (Note 3).
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the
opinion of management, these unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation
of the financial position of the Company at March 31, 2007,
the results of operations for the three and six month periods
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and cash flows for the six
month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Although the
Company believes that the disclosures in these financial
statements are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, certain information normally included in the
footnotes prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles has been omitted as permitted by
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The accompanying financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2006.
The results for the six month period ended March 31, 2007
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, or
any future period.
Reclassification
Certain amounts presented in prior periods consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current periods presentation.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates, assumptions and judgments,
including those related to revenue recognition; allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns; accounting for patent legal
defense costs; the costs to complete the development of custom
software applications; the valuation of goodwill, other
intangible assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for
acquisitions; share-based payments; the obligation relating to
pension and post-retirement benefit plans; interest rate swaps
which are characterized as derivative instruments; income tax
reserves and valuation allowances; and loss contingencies. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various
other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual amounts could differ significantly from
these estimates.
5
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basis
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes software revenue in accordance with
Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by
SOP 98-9
and all related interpretations. Non-software revenue is
recognized in accordance with, the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
and
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and
Certain Performance Type Contracts. For revenue
arrangements with multiple elements outside of the scope of
SOP 97-2,
the Company accounts for the arrangements in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements, and
allocates an arrangements fees into separate units
accounting based on their relative fair value. In select
situations, we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with, or in place of, embedding our intellectual
property in software. In general, the Company recognizes revenue
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, collectibility is
probable, and vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) of fair value exists for any undelivered
elements. When contracts contain substantive customer acceptance
provisions, revenue and related costs are deferred until such
acceptance is obtained. The Company reduces recognized revenue
for estimated future returns, price protection and rebates, and
certain marketing allowances at the time the related revenue is
recorded.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment by the Company. Certain
distributors and value-added resellers have been granted rights
of return for as long as the distributors or resellers hold the
inventory. The Company has not analyzed historical returns from
these distributors and resellers to have a basis upon which to
estimate future sales returns. As a result, the Company
recognizes revenue from sales to these distributors and
resellers when the products are sold through to retailers and
end-users. Based on reports from distributors and resellers of
their inventory balances at the end of each period, the Company
records an allowance against accounts receivable and reduces
revenue for all inventories subject to return at the sales price.
The Company also makes an estimate of sales returns based on
historical experience. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) 48, Revenue
Recognition When Right of Return Exists, the provision for
these estimated returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue
and accounts receivable at the time that the related revenue is
recorded. If actual returns differ significantly from the
Companys estimates, such differences could have a material
impact on the Companys results of operations for the
period in which the actual returns become known.
Revenue from royalties on sales of the Companys products
by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as the Company has been notified by the OEM that such
royalties are due, and provided that all other revenue
recognition criteria are met.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosting basis is recognized in the period the services are
provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Subscription and
hosting revenue is recognized as the Company is notified by the
customer or through management reports that such revenue is due,
provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
When the Company provides maintenance and support services, it
recognizes the revenue ratably over the term of the related
contracts, typically one to three years. When maintenance and
support contracts renew automatically, the Company provides a
reserve based on historical experience for contracts expected to
be cancelled for non-payment. All known and estimated
cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue and
accounts receivable.
6
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Professional services are generally not considered essential to
the functionality of the software and are recognized as revenue
when the related services are performed. Professional services
revenue is generally recognized based on the
percentage-of-completion
method in accordance with
SOP 81-1.
The Company generally determines the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. The Company
considers labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure
of progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to
complete are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a
change become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss
will be incurred, such loss is recorded in the period
identified. Significant judgments and estimates are involved in
determining the percent complete of each contract. Different
assumptions could yield materially different results. When the
Company provides services on a time and materials basis, it
recognizes revenue as it performs the services based on actual
time incurred.
The Company may sell, under one contract or related contracts,
software licenses, professional services,
and/or a
maintenance and support arrangement. The total contract value is
attributed first to the undelivered elements based on VSOE of
their fair value. VSOE is established by the price charged when
that element is sold separately. The remainder of the contract
value is attributed to the delivered elements, typically
software licenses, which are typically recognized as revenue
upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria
are met. When the Company provides professional services
considered essential to the functionality of the software, such
as custom application development for a fixed fee, it recognizes
revenue from the services as well as any related software
licenses on a
percentage-of-completion
basis.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor (Including
a Reseller of the Vendors Products), and records
consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of revenue to
the extent the Company has recorded cumulative revenue from the
customer or reseller. However, when the Company receives an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
01-14,
Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements for
Out-of-Pocket
Expenses Incurred, and records reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs,
and records shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The Company has significant long-lived tangible and intangible
assets, including goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
lives, which are susceptible to valuation adjustments as a
result of changes in various factors or conditions. The most
significant long-lived tangible and other intangible assets are
fixed assets, patents and core technology, completed technology,
customer relationships and trademarks. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits of such assets are expected to be utilized.
The values of intangible assets, with the exception of goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, were initially
determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted cash flow approach.
The Company assesses the potential impairment of identifiable
intangible assets and fixed assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be
recoverable. Factors it considers important, which could trigger
an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for the Companys overall business;
|
7
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in the Companys stock price for a
sustained period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in the Companys market capitalization below net
book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact future
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are tested for impairment on an annual basis as
of July 1, and between annual tests if indicators of
potential impairment exist. The impairment test compares the
fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount,
including goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives,
to assess whether impairment is present. The Company has
reviewed the provisions of SFAS 142 with respect to the
criteria necessary to evaluate the number of reporting units
that exist. Based on its review, the Company has determined that
it operates in one reporting unit. Based on this assessment, the
Company has not had any impairment charges during its history as
a result of its impairment evaluation of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets under SFAS 142.
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company
periodically reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value for the asset. If
impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its
estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
No impairment charges were taken during the six month periods
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, based on the review of
long-lived assets under SFAS 144. The Company may make
business decisions in the future which may result in the
impairment of intangible assets.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives and amortization patterns of long-lived assets,
determining what reporting units exist and assessing when events
or circumstances would require an interim impairment analysis of
goodwill or other long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in
the organization or the Companys management reporting
structure, as well as other events and circumstances, including
but not limited to technological advances, increased competition
and changing economic or market conditions, could result in
(a) shorter estimated useful lives, (b) additional
reporting units, which may require alternative methods of
estimating fair values or greater disaggregation or aggregation
in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Capitalized
Patent Defense Costs
The Company monitors the anticipated outcome of legal actions,
and if it determines that the success of the defense of a patent
is probable, and so long as the Company believes that the future
economic benefit of the patent will be increased, the Company
capitalizes external legal costs incurred in the defense of
these patents, up to the level of the expected increased future
economic benefit. If changes in the anticipated outcome occur,
the Company writes off any capitalized costs in the period the
change is determined. As of March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, capitalized patent defense costs
totaled $9.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and
other comprehensive income (loss), which includes current period
foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains
(losses) related to derivatives reported as cash flow hedges,
and unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities. For the
purposes of comprehensive income (loss) disclosures, the Company
does not record tax provisions or benefits for the net
8
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
changes in the foreign currency translation adjustment, as the
Company intends to reinvest undistributed earnings in its
foreign subsidiaries permanently.
The components of comprehensive income (loss), are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,272
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
Net unrealized losses on cash flow
hedge derivatives
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(883
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,016
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company computes net income (loss) per share under the
provisions of SFAS 128, Earnings per Share, and
EITF 03-06,
Participating Securities and Two
Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Accordingly, basic
net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income
(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period plus the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares,
which include outstanding stock options, warrants, unvested
shares of restricted stock using the treasury stock method and
the convertible debenture using the as converted method. Common
equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of diluted
net income (loss) per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares aggregating
25.0 million and 21.5 million shares for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively;
and 24.4 million and 30.4 million shares for the six
month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income
(loss) per share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Accounting
for Share-Based Payments
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R)
effective October 1, 2005. The Company has several equity
instruments that are required to be evaluated under
SFAS 123R, including: stock option plans, an employee stock
purchase plan, awards in the form of restricted shares
(Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of units
of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units). The
Restricted Stock and Restricted Units are collectively referred
to as Restricted Awards. SFAS 123R requires the
recognition of the fair value of share-based payments as a
charge against earnings. The Company recognizes share-based
payment expense over the requisite service period of the
individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period.
Based on the provisions of SFAS 123R the Companys
share-based payments awards are accounted for as equity
instruments. In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R,
the Company is required to amortize stock-based instruments with
performance-related vesting terms over the period from the grant
date to the sooner of the date upon which the performance
vesting condition will be met (when that condition is expected
to be met), or the time-based vesting dates. The cumulative
effect of the change in accounting as a result of the adoption
of SFAS 123R in
9
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fiscal 2006 was $0.7 million. The amounts included in the
consolidated statements of operations relating to share-based
payments are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4,853
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
7,697
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,364
|
|
|
$
|
5,230
|
|
|
$
|
20,954
|
|
|
$
|
9,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
The Company has several share-based payment plans under which
employees, officers, directors and consultants may be granted
stock options to purchase the Companys common stock
generally at the fair market value on the date of grant. Plans
do not allow for options to be granted at below fair market
value nor can they be re-priced at anytime. Options granted
under original plans of the Company become exercisable over
various periods, typically two to four years and have a maximum
term of 7 years. The Company also assumed an option plan in
connection with its acquisition of Nuance Communications, Inc.
(Former Nuance) on September 15, 2005. These
stock options are governed by the original agreement (the
Former Nuance Stock Option Plan) that they were
issued under, but are now exercisable for shares of the Company.
No further stock options may be issued under the Former Nuance
Stock Option Plan. All stock options have been granted with
exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair market value
of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The
table below summarizes activity relating to stock options for
the six months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
20,654,083
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,410,200
|
|
|
$
|
11.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,312,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(360,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(10,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,381,083
|
|
|
$
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
183.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
11,641,376
|
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
4.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
130.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
the Companys common stock on March 31, 2007 ($15.31)
and the exercise price of the underlying options. Stock options
to purchase 12,345,137 shares of common stock were
exercisable as of March 31, 2006. |
10
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of March 31, 2007, the total unamortized fair value of
stock options was $24.1 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 2.4 years. During the three
and six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the
following activity occurred under the Companys plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
|
$
|
5.04
|
|
|
$
|
4.54
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
23.12
|
|
|
$
|
19.60
|
|
|
$
|
30.45
|
|
|
$
|
28.70
|
|
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
calculate the grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value
of the stock options granted during the three and six month
periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were calculated using
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
|
63.0
|
%
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
|
|
63.0
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company
has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to
pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the Companys common stock over
the period commensurate with the expected life of the options
and the historical implied volatility from traded options with a
term of 180 days or greater. The risk-free interest rate is
derived from the average U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during
the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of
grant, commensurate with the expected life of the instrument.
Upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company used the
simplified method provided for under SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, which averages the contractual term
of the Companys options (7.0 years) with the vesting
term (2.2 years). Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2006 the Company has estimated the expected life based on the
historical exercise behavior.
Restricted
Awards
The Company is authorized to issue equity incentive awards in
the form of Restricted Awards, including Restricted Units and
Restricted Stock, which are individually discussed below.
Unvested Restricted Awards may not be sold, transferred or
assigned. The fair value of the Restricted Awards is measured
based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of
the date of grant, reduced by the purchase price of
$0.001 per share of the awards. The Restricted Awards
generally are subject to vesting over a period of two to three
years, and may have opportunities for acceleration for
achievement of defined goals. Beginning in fiscal 2006, the
Company began to issue certain Restricted Awards with vesting
solely dependent on the achievement of specified performance
targets. The fair value of the Restricted Awards is amortized to
expense over its applicable vesting period using the
straight-line method. In the event that the employees
employment with the Company terminates, or in the case of awards
with only performance goals those goals are not met, any
unvested shares are forfeited and revert to the Company.
11
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested. The table below
summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units for the six
months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
2,750,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,003,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(671,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(215,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,866,367
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
59.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to become exercisable
|
|
|
3,397,979
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
52.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
the Companys common stock on March 31, 2007 ($15.31)
and the exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is
$0.001 per share. As of March 31, 2007, unearned
share-based payment expense related to unvested Restricted Units
is $21.8 million, which will, based on expectations of
future performance vesting criteria, when applicable, be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. 45%
of the Restricted Units outstanding as of March 31, 2007 is
subject to performance vesting acceleration conditions. During
the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 the following activity occurred related to Restricted Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
$
|
12.09
|
|
|
$
|
8.56
|
|
|
$
|
11.02
|
|
|
$
|
8.38
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares
vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
8.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
Restricted Stock is included in the issued and outstanding
common stock in these financial statements at date of grant. The
table below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Stock for
the six months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
1,547,341
|
|
|
$
|
5.93
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14,555
|
|
|
$
|
8.24
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(304,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,256,961
|
|
|
$
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The purchase price for vested Restricted Stock is
$0.001 per share. As of March 31, 2007, unearned
share-based payment expense related to unvested Restricted Stock
is $4.5 million, which will, based on expectations of
future performance vesting criteria, when applicable, be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. 73%
of the Restricted Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2007
are subject to performance vesting acceleration conditions.
During the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2007
and 2006 the following activity occurred related to Restricted
Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares
vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
The Company has historically repurchased common stock upon its
employees vesting in Restricted Awards, in order to allow
the employees to cover their tax liability as a result of the
Restricted Awards having vested. Assuming that the Company
repurchased one-third of all vesting Restricted Awards
outstanding as of March 31, 2007, such amount approximating
a tax rate of its employees, and based on the weighted average
recognition period of 1.3 years, the Company would
repurchase approximately 1.0 million shares during the
twelve month period ending March 31, 2008. During the six
months ended March 31, 2007, the Company repurchased
227,637 shares of restricted awards at a cost of
$3.1 million to cover employees tax obligations
related to vesting of Restricted Awards.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
Plan), as amended and restated on March 31, 2006,
authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 3,000,000 shares of
common stock in semi-annual offerings to employees at a price
equal to the lower of 85% of the closing price on the applicable
offering commencement date or 85% of the closing price on the
applicable offering termination date. Compensation expense for
the employee stock purchase plan is recognized in accordance
with SFAS 123R. Compensation expense related to the
employee stock purchase plan was $0.5 million and
$1.0 million for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively, and was $0.2 million and
$0.4 million for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2006, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, which the
Company considers to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the
U.S. in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income
Taxes Special Areas.
The Company makes judgments regarding the realizability of its
deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, the carrying value of
the net deferred tax assets is based on the belief that it is
more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient
future taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets after
consideration of all available evidence. The Company regularly
reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability considering
historical profitability, projected future taxable income, and
the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which the Company believes do not
meet the more likely than not criteria established
by SFAS 109. If the Company is subsequently able to utilize
all or a portion of the deferred tax assets for which a
valuation allowance has been established, then the Company may
be required to recognize these deferred tax assets through the
reduction of the valuation allowance which would result in a
material benefit to its results of operations in the period in
which the benefit is determined, excluding the
13
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination and created as a result of share-based payments. The
recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets resulting from share-based
payments will be recorded as additional
paid-in-capital;
the recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination will reduce goodwill, other intangible assets, and
to the extent remaining, the provision for income taxes.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company follows the requirements of SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, which establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments. To achieve hedge
accounting, the criteria specified in SFAS 133, must be
met, including (i) ensuring at the inception of the hedge
that formal documentation exists for both the hedging
relationship and the entitys risk management objective and
strategy for undertaking the hedge and (ii) at the
inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the hedging
relationship is expected to be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value attributed to the hedged risk
during the period that the hedge is designated. Further, an
assessment of effectiveness is required whenever financial
statements or earnings are reported. Absent meeting these
criteria, changes in fair value are recognized currently in
other expense, net of tax, in the income statement. Once the
underlying forecasted transaction is realized, the gain or loss
from the derivative designated as a hedge of the transaction is
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to the
income statement, in the related revenue or expense caption, as
appropriate. Any ineffective portion of the derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges is recognized in current
earnings. As of March 31, 2007, there was a
$100 million interest rate swap (the Swap)
outstanding. The Swap was entered into in conjunction with a
term loan on March 31, 2006. The Swap was designated as a
cash flow hedge, and changes in the fair value of this cash flow
hedge derivative are recorded in stockholders equity as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). At
March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the fair value
of the Swap was $0.6 million and was included in other
liabilities.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS 159 has as its objective to reduce
both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and
volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently. It also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons
between companies that choose different measurement attributes
for similar types of assets and liabilities. The statement is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal
year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year,
provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120 days of that fiscal year. The Company is evaluating the
impact, if any, that SFAS 159 may have on its consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2006, the FASB issued EITF
00-19-2,
Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments
or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment
arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included
as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement,
should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. For registration payment arrangements and
financial instruments subject to those arrangements that were
entered into prior to the issuance of EITF
00-19-2,
this guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company is evaluating the impact, if any, that EITF
00-19-2 may
have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the over-funded or
under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan
(other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in
its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in
that
14
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires the
measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of
the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of
financial position (with limited exceptions). Under
SFAS 158, the Company will be required to recognize the
funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plan and to
provide the required disclosures commencing as of
September 30, 2007. The requirement to measure plan assets
and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end is effective for the Companys fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that SFAS 158 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
its fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48
will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Acquisition
of Focus
On March 26, 2007, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Bluestar Resources Limited, the
parent of Focus Enterprises Limited and Focus India Private
Limited (collectively Focus) which provides medical
transcription services with operations in the United States and
India. The purchase price consists of $59.3 million in cash
including transaction costs, and the assumption of certain
obligations. The acquisition has been accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations
have been included in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations from the date of acquisition. The following table
summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
54,477
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
59,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
Other current and non current
assets
|
|
|
953
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
23,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
70,820
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(9,008
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(11,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
59,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
19,800
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Non-competes
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Mobile Voice Control, Inc.
On December 29, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Mobile Voice Control, Inc.
(MVC), a provider of speech-enabled mobile search
and messaging services, for $12.8 million. The purchase
price consists of $4.5 million in cash including
transaction costs, and 784,266 shares of the Companys
common stock valued at $8.3 million. The acquisition has
been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and
the results of operations have been included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations from the date of
acquisition. The following table summarizes the preliminary
allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
12,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non current assets
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
12,955
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
12,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the agreement, the Company agreed to make maximum
additional payments of $18.0 million in contingent purchase
price upon achievement of certain established financial targets
through December 31, 2008. Additional payments, if any,
related to this contingency will be accounted for as additional
goodwill.
16
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-competes
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, excluding acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
119,242
|
|
|
$
|
118,580
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,389
|
|
|
|
12,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,631
|
|
|
|
130,985
|
|
Less allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
Less reserve for
distribution and reseller accounts receivable
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
|
|
(9,797
|
)
|
Less allowance for
sales returns
|
|
|
(7,280
|
)
|
|
|
(6,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
117,267
|
|
|
$
|
110,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable primarily relate to product revenue
earned under royalty-based arrangements for which billing occurs
in the month following receipt of the royalty report, and for
professional services revenue earned under percentage of
completion contracts that have not yet been billed based on the
terms of the specific arrangement.
5. Inventories,
net
Inventories, net of allowances, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Components and parts
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
$
|
2,311
|
|
Inventory at customers
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,352
|
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at customers reflects equipment related to in-process
installations of solutions of Dictaphone contracts with
customers. These contracts have not been recorded to revenue as
of March 31, 2007, and therefore the inventory is on the
balance sheet until such time as the contract is recorded to
revenue and the inventory will be expensed to cost of sales.
17
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six
months ended March 31, 2007, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
699,333
|
|
Goodwill acquired MVC
acquisition
|
|
|
10,176
|
|
Goodwill acquired
Focus acquisition
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(1,790
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
750,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill adjustments during the six months ended March 31,
2007 included $2.0 million relating to the utilization of
acquired deferred tax assets, offset by $0.2 million of
purchase accounting adjustments related to previous acquisitions.
Other intangible assets consist of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Remaining Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
168,939
|
|
|
$
|
30,614
|
|
|
$
|
138,325
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
94,931
|
|
|
|
36,333
|
|
|
|
58,598
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Tradenames and trademarks, subject
to amortization
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
4,191
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
272,707
|
|
|
|
70,017
|
|
|
|
202,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
300,507
|
|
|
$
|
70,017
|
|
|
$
|
230,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the Companys other intangible
assets with finite lives was $8.1 million and
$16.1 million for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively, and was $4.5 million and
$8.9 million for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2006, respectively. Estimated future amortization
expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007 (April 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2007)
|
|
$
|
5,826
|
|
|
$
|
12,295
|
|
|
$
|
18,121
|
|
2008
|
|
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
23,381
|
|
|
|
34,827
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,428
|
|
|
|
21,221
|
|
|
|
31,649
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
|
18,477
|
|
|
|
28,119
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
16,968
|
|
|
|
25,986
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
15,823
|
|
|
|
22,763
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
|
35,927
|
|
|
|
41,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58,598
|
|
|
$
|
144,092
|
|
|
$
|
202,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
19,709
|
|
|
$
|
21,310
|
|
Accrued sales and marketing
incentives
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Accrued acquisition costs and
liabilities
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
19,748
|
|
|
|
16,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57,228
|
|
|
$
|
52,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Deferred
and Contingent Acquisition Payments
|
In connection with the Companys acquisition of Phonetic
Systems Ltd. (Phonetic) in February 2005, a deferred
payment of $17.5 million was due and paid in full to the
former shareholders of Phonetic on February 1, 2007. Under
the agreement, the Company also agreed to make maximum
additional payments of $35.0 million in contingent purchase
price upon achievement of certain established financial and
performance targets through December 31, 2007. On
June 1, 2006, the Company notified the former shareholders
of Phonetic that the financial and performance targets for the
first scheduled payment of up to $12.0 million were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Phonetic have objected to
this determination. The Company and the former shareholders of
Phonetic are discussing this matter. Additional payments, if
any, related to this contingency will be accounted for as
additional goodwill.
|
|
9.
|
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
|
In connection with the acquisition of Dictaphone on
March 31, 2006, the Company assumed the assets and
obligations related to its defined benefit pension plans, which
provide certain retirement and death benefits for former
Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom and Canada.
The Company also assumed a post-retirement health care and life
insurance benefit plan which provides certain post-retirement
health care and life insurance benefits, as well as a fixed
subsidy for qualified former employees in the United States and
Canada. Amounts recognized in other assets and liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
(7,159
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(4,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the benefit plans
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Interest Cost
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Amortization of net (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net period benefit cost
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
On March 31, 2006, the Company entered into a senior
secured credit facility (the 2006 Credit Facility).
The 2006 Credit Facility consists of a $355.0 million
7-year term
loan which matures on March 31, 2013 and a
$75.0 million revolving credit line which matures on
March 31, 2012. The available revolving credit line
capacity is reduced, as necessary, to account for certain
letters of credit outstanding. As of March 31, 2007, there
were $17.4 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at the Companys
option, either (a) a base rate (which is the higher of the
corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR
determined by reference to the British Bankers Association
Interest Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars. The
applicable margin for borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility
ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum with respect to base
rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon the
Companys leverage ratio. As of March 31, 2007, the
Companys applicable margin was 1.00% for base rate
borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. The Company is
required to pay a commitment fee for unutilized commitments
under the revolving credit facility at a rate ranging from
0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our leverage ratio.
As of March 31, 2007, the commitment fee rate was 0.375%.
The Company capitalized approximately $9.0 million in debt
issuance costs related to the opening of the 2006 Credit
Facility. The costs associated with the revolving credit
facility are being amortized as interest expense over six years,
through March 2012, while the costs associated with the term
loan are being amortized as interest expense over seven years,
through March 2013, which are the maturity dates of the
revolving line and term facility, respectively under the 2006
Credit Facility. The effective interest method is used to
calculate the amortization of the debt issuance costs for both
the revolving credit facility and the term loan. These debt
issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$1.3 million, are included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007.
20
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The $355.0 million term loan is subject to repayment
consisting of a baseline amortization of 1% per annum
($3.55 million per year, due in four equal quarterly
installments), and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the 2006 Credit Facility, which will be first payable
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, based on the
excess cash flow generated in fiscal 2007. As of March 31,
2007, we have repaid $3.6 million of principal under the
term loan agreement. Any borrowings not paid through the
baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or any other
mandatory or optional payments that the Company may make, will
be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are
made, the aggregate annual maturities of the term loan would be
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2007 (April 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2007)
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
331,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
351,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys obligations under the 2006 Credit Facility
are unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain
exceptions, each of its existing and future direct and indirect
wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The 2006 Credit Facility and
the guarantees thereof are secured by first priority liens and
security interests in the following: 100% of the capital stock
of substantially all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries
and 65% of the outstanding voting equity interests and 100% of
the non-voting equity interests of first-tier foreign
subsidiaries, material tangible and intangible assets, and
present and future intercompany debt. The 2006 Credit Facility
also contains provisions for mandatory prepayments of
outstanding term loans, subject to certain exceptions, with:
100% of net cash proceeds of asset sales, 100% of net cash
proceeds of issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100% of
extraordinary receipts. The Company may voluntarily prepay the
2006 Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR-based
loans.
The 2006 Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: incur additional
indebtedness, create liens on assets, enter into certain sale
and lease-back transactions, make investments, make certain
acquisitions, sell assets, engage in mergers or consolidations,
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase the Companys
capital stock, engage in certain transactions with affiliates,
change the business conducted by the Company and its
subsidiaries, amend certain charter documents and material
agreements governing subordinated indebtedness, prepay other
indebtedness, enter into agreements that restrict dividends from
subsidiaries and enter into certain derivatives transactions.
The 2006 Credit Facility is governed by financial covenants that
include, but are not limited to, maximum total leverage and
minimum interest coverage ratios, as well as to a maximum
capital expenditures limitation. The 2006 Credit Facility also
contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of
default. As of March 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with the covenants under the 2006 Credit Facility.
On April 5, 2007, the Company amended and restated its 2006
Credit Facility to modify certain covenants as well as provide
for an incremental $90 million term loan facility
(Note 18).
|
|
11.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
In connection with the acquisitions of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. in August 2003 and Former Nuance in
September 2005, the Company has assumed obligations relating to
certain leased facilities expiring in 2016 and 2012,
respectively, that were abandoned by the acquired companies
prior to the acquisition date. The fair value of the
obligations, net of estimated sublease income, are recognized as
liabilities assumed by the Company and
21
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accordingly are included in the allocation of the purchase
price, generally resulting in an increase to the recorded amount
of the goodwill. The net payments have been discounted in
calculating the fair value of the obligation as of the date of
acquisition, and the discount is being accreted through expected
maturity. Cash payments net of sublease receipts are presented
as cash used in financing activities on the consolidated
statements of cash flows. As of March 31, 2007, the total
gross payments due from the Company to the landlords of the
facilities is $82.7 million. This is reduced by
$20.8 million of sublease income and a $5.5 million
present value discount.
Additionally, the Company has implemented restructuring plans to
eliminate duplicate facilities, personnel or assets in
connection with the business combinations. In accordance with
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination, costs such as these are recognized
as liabilities assumed by the Company, and accordingly are
included in the allocation of the purchase price, generally
resulting in an increase to the recorded amount of the goodwill.
As of March 31, 2007, total gross payments due from the
Company to the landlords of the facilities is $2.6 million.
This is reduced by $0.9 million of sublease income. The
gross value of the lease exit costs will be paid through fiscal
2009. These gross payment obligations are included in the
commitments disclosed in Note 14.
Current activity charged against the accrued business
combination costs for the six months ended March 31, 2007
was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
59,221
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
60,065
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease
receipts
|
|
|
(6,369
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
53,868
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
|
Current activity charged against the restructuring accrual for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Cash payments and foreign exchange
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining personnel-related accrual as of March 31,
2007 is primarily composed of amounts due under a restructuring
charge taken in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 which is
expected to be paid during fiscal 2007.
Preferred
Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Company
has designated 100,000 shares as Series A Preferred
Stock and 15,000,000 shares as Series B Preferred
Stock. In connection with the acquisition of ScanSoft from Xerox
Corporation (Xerox), the Company issued
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Xerox.
On March 19, 2004, the Company announced that Warburg
Pincus, a global private equity firm, had agreed to purchase all
outstanding shares of the Companys stock held by Xerox
Corporation for approximately $80 million, including the
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The
Series B Preferred stock is convertible into shares of
common stock on a
one-for-one
basis. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation
preference of $1.30 per share plus all declared but unpaid
dividends. The holders of Series B
22
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred Stock are entitled to non-cumulative dividends at the
rate of $0.05 per annum per share, payable when, and if
declared by the Board of Directors. To date, no dividends have
been declared by the Board of Directors. Holders of
Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except
those rights provided under Delaware law. The undesignated
shares of preferred stock will have rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend
rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation
preferences, as shall be determined by the Board of Directors
upon issuance of the preferred stock. The Company has reserved
3,562,238 shares of its common stock for issuance upon
conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.
Common
Stock
On March 22, 2007, the Companys shareholders approved
an amendment to the Companys Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of
common stock the Company is authorized to issue from
280,000,000 shares to 560,000,000 shares.
On January 26, 2007, the Company repurchased
261,422 shares of the Companys common stock from
former MVC stockholders which were originally issued in
connection with the acquisition of MVC on December 29,
2006, for a total purchase price of $3.2 million.
On December 29, 2006, the Company issued
784,266 shares of its common stock in connection with the
acquisition of MVC.
On May 5, 2005, the Company entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement (the Securities Purchase
Agreement) by and among the Company, Warburg Pincus
Private Equity VIII, L.P. and certain of its affiliated entities
(collectively Warburg Pincus) pursuant to which
Warburg Pincus agreed to purchase, and the Company agreed to
sell, 3,537,736 shares of its common stock and warrants to
purchase 863,236 shares of its common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $15.1 million. The warrants
have an exercise price of $5.00 per share and a term of
four years. On May 9, 2005, the sale of the shares and the
warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement was
completed. The Company also entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) by and
among the Company and Warburg Pincus pursuant to which Warburg
Pincus agreed to purchase and the Company agreed to sell
14,150,943 shares of the Companys common stock and
warrants to purchase 3,177,570 shares of the Companys
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$60.0 million. The warrants have an exercise price of
$5.00 per share and a term of four years. The warrants
provide the holder with the option to exercise the warrants on a
net, or cashless, basis. On September 15, 2005, the sale of
the shares and the warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase
Agreement was completed. The net proceeds from these two fiscal
2005 financings was $73.9 million. In connection with the
financings, the Company granted Warburg Pincus registration
rights giving Warburg Pincus the right to request that the
Company use commercially reasonable efforts to register some or
all of the shares of common stock issued to Warburg Pincus under
both the Securities Purchase Agreement and Stock Purchase
Agreement, including shares of common stock underlying the
warrants. The Company has evaluated these warrants under EITF
00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock
and has determined that the warrants should be classified within
the stockholders equity section of the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Common
Stock Warrants
In fiscal 2005, the Company issued several warrants for the
purchase of its common stock. Warrants were issued to Warburg
Pincus as described above. Additionally, on November 15,
2004, in connection with the acquisition of Phonetic, the
Company issued unvested warrants to purchase 750,000 shares
of its common stock at an exercise price of $4.46 per share
that will vest, if at all, upon the achievement of certain
performance targets. The warrants provide the holder with the
option to exercise the warrants on a net, or cashless, basis.
The initial valuation of the warrants occurred upon closing of
the Phonetic acquisition, February 1, 2005, and was treated
as purchase consideration in accordance with
EITF 97-8,
Accounting for Contingent Consideration Issued in a
Purchase Business Combination.
23
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In March 1999 the Company issued Xerox a ten-year warrant with
an exercise price for each warrant share of $0.61. This warrant
is exercisable for the purchase of 525,732 shares of the
Companys common stock. On March 19, 2004, the Company
announced that Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, had
agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of the Companys
stock held by Xerox Corporation, including this warrant, for
approximately $80 million. In connection with this
transaction, Warburg Pincus acquired new warrants to purchase
2.5 million additional shares of the Companys common
stock from the Company for total consideration of
$0.6 million. The warrants have a six-year life and an
exercise price of $4.94. The warrants provide the holder with
the option to exercise the warrants on a net, or cashless, basis.
In connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks in 2003, the
Company issued a warrant to its investment banker, expiring on
August 11, 2011, for the purchase of 150,000 shares of
the Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$3.98 per share. The warrant provides the holder with the
option to exercise the warrants on a net, or cashless, basis.
The warrant became exercisable on August 11, 2005, and was
valued at its issuance at $0.2 million based upon the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: expected volatility of 60%, a risk-free interest
rate of 4.03%, an expected term of 8 years, no dividends
and a stock price of $3.92, based on the Companys stock
price at the time of issuance. During the six months ended
March 31, 2007, the warrant was exercised to purchase
125,620 shares of the Companys common stock. The
holder of the warrant elected a cashless exercise resulting in a
net issuance of 75,623 shares of the Companys common
stock. As of March 31, 2007, a warrant to purchase
24,380 shares of the Companys common stock remains
outstanding.
Also in connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks, the
Company assumed outstanding warrants previously issued by
SpeechWorks to America Online. These warrants allow for the
purchase of up to 219,421 shares of the Companys
common stock, and were issued in connection with a long-term
marketing arrangement. The warrant is currently exercisable at a
price of $14.49 per share and provides the holder with the
option to exercise the warrants on a net, or cashless, basis.
The warrant expires on June 30, 2007 and the value of the
warrant was insignificant.
Based on its review of EITF
00-19, the
Company has determined that each of the above-noted warrants
should be classified within the stockholders equity
section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
24
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company has various operating leases for office space around
the world. In connection with many of its acquisitions the
Company assumed facility lease obligations. Among these assumed
obligations are lease payments related to certain office
locations that were vacated by certain of the acquired companies
prior to the acquisition date (Note 11). Additionally,
certain of the Companys lease obligations have been
included in various restructuring charges (Note 12). The
following table outlines the Companys gross future minimum
payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of
March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007 (April 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2007)
|
|
$
|
3,574
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
$
|
6,185
|
|
|
$
|
10,574
|
|
2008
|
|
|
8,267
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
22,605
|
|
2009
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
13,202
|
|
|
|
22,540
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6,757
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
13,639
|
|
|
|
20,919
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,877
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
14,172
|
|
|
|
20,589
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
12,661
|
|
|
|
18,062
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
14,764
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
10,093
|
|
|
|
25,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
51,989
|
|
|
$
|
5,757
|
|
|
$
|
82,732
|
|
|
$
|
140,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, the Company has subleased certain office
space that is included in the above table to third parties.
Total
sub-lease
income under contractual terms is $24.9 million and which
ranges from approximately $1.0 million to $3.8 million
on an annual basis through February 2016.
In connection with certain of its acquisitions, the Company
assumed certain financial guarantees that the acquired companies
had committed to the landlords. As of March 31, 2007, the
total outstanding financial guarantees related to real estate
were $17.4 million and are secured by the 2006 Credit
Facility.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, the Company has,
from time to time been notified of claims that it may be
infringing certain intellectual property rights of others. These
claims have been referred to counsel, and they are in various
stages of evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, the Company may seek licenses for these intellectual
property rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be
offered by all claimants, that the terms of any offered licenses
will be acceptable to the Company or that in all cases the
dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be time
consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive relief or
the payment of damages by the Company.
On April 10, 2007, Disc Link Corporation (Disc
Link) filed a patent infringement action against the
Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas. Damages are sought in an unspecified amount.
In this lawsuit, Disc Link alleges that the Company infringes
U.S. Patent No. 6,314,574, titled Information
Distribution System. The Company is in the early stages of
evaluating these claims and intends to defend the action
vigorously.
On November 8, 2006, VoiceSignal Technologies, Inc. filed
an action against the Company and eleven of its resellers in the
United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania claiming patent infringement. Damages were sought
in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, VoiceSignal alleges
that the Company is infringing United States Patent
No. 5,855,000 which relates to improving correction in a
dictation application based on a two input analysis. The Company
believes these claims have no merit and intends to defend the
action vigorously.
25
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On May 31, 2006 GTX Corporation (GTX), filed an
action against the Company in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas claiming patent infringement.
Damages were sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit,
GTX alleged that the Company is infringing United States Patent
No. 7,016,536 entitled Method and Apparatus for
Automatic Cleaning and Enhancing of Scanned Documents. The
Company believes these claims have no merit and intends to
defend the action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc
(AllVoice) filed an action against the Company in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas claiming patent infringement. In the lawsuit, AllVoice
alleges that the Company is infringing United States Patent
No. 5,799,273 entitled Automated Proofreading Using
Interface Linking Recognized Words to their Audio Data While
Text is Being Changed (the 273 Patent).
The 273 Patent generally discloses techniques for
manipulating audio data associated with text generated by a
speech recognition engine. Although the Company has several
products in the speech recognition technology field, the Company
believes that its products do not infringe the 273 Patent
because, in addition to other defenses, they do not use the
claimed techniques. Damages are sought in an unspecified amount.
The Company filed an Answer on December 23, 2002. The
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
entered summary judgment against AllVoice and dismissed all
claims against the Company on February 21, 2006. AllVoice
filed a notice of appeal from this judgment on April 26,
2006. The Company believes these claims have no merit and
intends to defend the action vigorously.
The Company believes that the final outcome of the current
litigation matters described above will not have a significant
adverse effect on its financial position and results of
operations. However, even if the Companys defense is
successful, the litigation could require significant management
time and could be costly. Should the Company not prevail in
these litigation matters, its operating results, financial
position and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
The Company currently includes indemnification provisions in the
contracts into which it enters with its customers and business
partners. Generally, these provisions require the Company to
defend claims arising out of its products infringement of
third-party intellectual property rights, breach of contractual
obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct on its part. The
indemnity obligations imposed by these provisions generally
cover damages, costs and attorneys fees arising out of
such claims. In most, but not all, cases, the Companys
total liability under such provisions is limited to either the
value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases its total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term of the
indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential
amount of future payments the Company could be required to make
under all the indemnification provisions in its contracts with
customers and business partners is unlimited, it believes that
the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to
the low frequency with which these provisions have been
triggered.
The Company has entered into agreements to indemnify its
directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized or
permitted under applicable law. These agreements, among other
things, provide for the indemnification of its directors and
officers for expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and
settlement amounts incurred by any such person in his or her
capacity as a director or officer of the Company, whether or not
such person is acting or serving in any such capacity at the
time any liability or expense is incurred for which
indemnification can be provided under the agreements. In
accordance with the terms of the SpeechWorks merger agreement,
the Company is required to indemnify the former members of the
SpeechWorks board of directors, on similar terms as described
above, for a period of six years from the acquisition date. In
connection with this indemnification, the Company was required
to purchase a director and officer insurance policy related to
this obligation for a period of three years from the date of
acquisition. This three-year policy was purchased in 2003. In
accordance with the terms of each of the Former Nuance and
Dictaphone merger agreements, the Company is required to
indemnify the former members of the Former Nuance and Dictaphone
boards of directors, on similar terms as described above, for a
period of six
26
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
years from the acquisition date. In connection with these
indemnifications, the Company has purchased director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations covering the
full period of six years.
At March 31, 2007, the Company has $4.1 million of
non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventory to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in its backlog.
|
|
15.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
The Company has reviewed the provisions of SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, with respect to the criteria necessary to
evaluate the number of operating segments that exist. Based on
its review, the Company has determined that it operates in one
segment. Changes in the organization or the Companys
management reporting structure, as well as other events and
circumstances, including but not limited to technological
advances, increased competition and changing economic or market
conditions, could result in (a) shorter estimated useful
lives, (b) additional reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which the
Companys customers are located, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
100,830
|
|
|
$
|
47,750
|
|
|
$
|
202,380
|
|
|
$
|
97,661
|
|
International
|
|
|
31,232
|
|
|
|
23,978
|
|
|
|
63,103
|
|
|
|
49,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
132,062
|
|
|
$
|
71,728
|
|
|
$
|
265,483
|
|
|
$
|
147,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States composed greater than
10% of total revenue.
The following table presents revenue information for principal
product lines, which do not constitute separate segments (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Speech
|
|
$
|
113,460
|
|
|
$
|
55,556
|
|
|
$
|
228,462
|
|
|
$
|
113,724
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
18,602
|
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
37,021
|
|
|
|
33,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
132,062
|
|
|
$
|
71,728
|
|
|
$
|
265,483
|
|
|
$
|
147,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No customer accounted for greater than 10% of revenue or
accounts receivable as of March 31, 2007 or
September 30, 2006.
The following table summarizes the Companys long-lived
assets, including intangible assets and goodwill, by geographic
location (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
893,146
|
|
|
$
|
865,884
|
|
International
|
|
|
145,752
|
|
|
|
105,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,038,898
|
|
|
$
|
971,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reflects unaudited pro forma results of
operations of the Company assuming that the Dictaphone and Focus
acquisitions had occurred on October 1, 2005 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
136,822
|
|
|
$
|
114,643
|
|
|
$
|
274,885
|
|
|
$
|
235,726
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,784
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,828
|
)
|
Net loss per basic and diluted
share
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
The Company has not furnished pro forma financial information
relating to the MVC acquisition because such information is not
material. The unaudited pro forma results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have
occurred had the transactions actually taken place at the
beginning of the periods indicated.
A member of the Companys Board of Directors is also a
partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation, a law firm that provides services to
the Company. In the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the
fiscal year 2006, the Company paid $0.3 million and
$4.9 million, respectively, to Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati for professional services provided
to the Company. As of March 31, 2007 and September 30,
2006, the Company had $3.4 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
On February 12, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger to acquire BeVocal, Inc.
(BeVocal), a provider of self-service customer care
solutions that address the unique business requirements of the
mobile communications market and its customers. The transaction
closed on April 24, 2007. Under the terms of the agreement
and plan of merger, the purchase price payable to BeVocals
stockholders consists of an initial payment of approximately
$15.0 million in cash, net of the estimated cash closing
balance of BeVocal, and approximately 8.3 million shares of
the Companys common stock. Up to an additional
$60.0 million in cash may also be paid, if at all,
approximately 18 months following the closing, upon the
achievement of certain performance objectives.
On April 5, 2007, the Company amended its 2006 Credit
Facility, and received additional net proceeds of approximately
$87.5 million. The 2006 Credit Facility and the amendment
provide for the amendment and restatement of the Companys
existing
7-year term
facility and
6-year
revolving credit facility (together, the Expanded 2006
Credit Facility). The Expanded 2006 Credit Facility
includes $90 million of additional term debt resulting in a
$442 million term facility due in March 2013 and a
$75 million revolving credit facility due in March 2012.
The additional funds net of debt issuance costs received by the
Company under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility was used to fund
the cash portion of the merger consideration of Focus and
BeVocal as discussed in Note 3 and above. The Expanded 2006
Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including, among
other things, covenants that in certain cases restrict the
ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, enter into
sale-leaseback transactions, make loans or investments, sell
assets, make acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock.
28
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of other intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to speech and imaging technologies;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from prior
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of speech and imaging solutions for
businesses and consumers around the world. Our technologies,
applications and services are transforming the way people
create, use and interact with information and make the
experience of our end users a more compelling, convenient and
satisfying one.
Our speech technologies enable voice-activated services over a
telephone, transform speech into written word, and permit the
control of devices and applications by simply speaking. With the
acquisition of Dictaphone, we expanded our speech technologies
in the automatic conversion of voice reports into electronic
patient reports for a wide range of users in the transcription
and healthcare industry. Our imaging solutions offer
cost-effective PDF applications for business users, convert
paper and PDF into documents that can be easily edited, and
simplify scanning and document management using multifunction
scanners and networked digital copiers.
Our software can be delivered as part of a larger integrated
system, such as systems for customer service call centers, or as
an independent application, such as dictation, medical
transcription, document or PDF conversion, navigation systems in
automobiles or digital copiers on a network. In select
situations we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with, or in place of, embedding our intellectual
property in software. Our products and technologies deliver a
measurable return on investment to our customers and our goal is
to help our customers optimize productivity and reduce costs.
29
We market and distribute our products indirectly through a
global network of resellers comprising system integrators,
independent software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware
vendors, telecommunications carriers and distributors; and
directly to businesses and consumers through a dedicated direct
sales force and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
Nuance was incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the
laws of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2004, we changed our fiscal year end to
September 30, resulting in a nine-month fiscal year for
2004. In October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance
Communications, Inc., to reflect our core mission of being the
worlds most comprehensive and innovative provider of
speech solutions, and in November 2005 we changed our ticker
symbol to NUAN.
Our business is predicated on providing our partners and
customers with a comprehensive portfolio of value-added
solutions, ensuring technological leadership, promoting the
broad adoption of our innovative technology and building global
sales and channel relationships. We continue to execute on our
strategy of maintaining leadership in speech and imaging through
sustained growth in our ongoing operations as well as through
strategic acquisitions that complement our existing capabilities.
Our focus on providing competitive and value-added solutions for
our customers and partners requires a broad set of technologies,
service offerings and channel capabilities. We have successfully
completed approximately 17 acquisitions since 2000 and we
expect to continue to make acquisitions of other companies,
businesses and technologies to complement our internal
investments. We have a team that focuses on evaluating market
needs and potential acquisitions to fulfill them. In addition,
we have a disciplined methodology for integrating acquired
companies and businesses after the transaction is complete. In
recent fiscal years, we completed a number of acquisitions,
including the following significant transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
On January 30, 2003, we acquired Royal Philips Electronics
Speech Processing Telephony and Voice Control business units to
expand our solutions for speech in call centers and within
automobiles and mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2003, we acquired SpeechWorks International,
Inc. to broaden our speech applications for telecommunications,
call centers and embedded environments as well as establish a
professional services organization.
|
|
|
|
On February 1, 2005, we acquired Phonetic Systems
Ltd. to complement our solutions and expertise in
automated directory assistance and enterprise speech
applications.
|
|
|
|
On September 15, 2005, we acquired the former Nuance
Communications, Inc., which we refer to as Former Nuance, to
expand our portfolio of technologies, applications and services
for call center automation, customer self service and directory
assistance.
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006, we acquired Dictaphone Corporation, a
leading healthcare information technology company, to broaden
our range of digital dictation, transcription, and report
management system solutions.
|
|
|
|
On March 26, 2007, we acquired Bluestar Resources Limited,
the parent of Focus Enterprises Limited and Focus India Private
Limited (collectively Focus), which provide medical
transcription services, to enhance our hosted services offerings.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis,
we evaluate our estimates and judgments, in particular those
related to revenue recognition; the costs to complete the
development of custom software applications and valuation
allowances (specifically sales returns and other allowances);
accounting for patent legal defense costs; the valuation of
goodwill, other intangible assets and tangible long-lived
assets; estimates used in the accounting for acquisitions;
assumptions used in valuing stock-
30
based compensation instruments; assumptions used in determining
the obligations and assets relating to pension and
post-retirement benefit plans; judgment with respect to interest
rate swaps which are characterized as derivative instruments;
evaluating loss contingencies; and valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets. Actual amounts could differ significantly
from these estimates. Our management bases its estimates and
judgments on historical experience and various other factors
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of
revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other
sources.
Additional information about these critical accounting policies
may be found in the Managements
Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations section included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
revenue
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
68.1
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Restructuring and other charges,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Total
Revenue
The following table shows total revenue by geographic location,
based on the location of our customers, in absolute dollars and
percentage change (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
|
$
|
47.7
|
|
|
$
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
112
|
%
|
|
$
|
202.4
|
|
|
$
|
97.7
|
|
|
$
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
107
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
132.1
|
|
|
$
|
71.7
|
|
|
$
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
$
|
265.5
|
|
|
$
|
147.3
|
|
|
$
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006, was primarily due to $45.7 million of
revenue related to the acquisition of Dictaphone, and a
$14.7 million, or 21%, increase in organic revenue.
Included in this organic growth, network revenue increased by
16%, dictation revenue increased 33%, embedded revenue increased
by 28% and imaging revenue increased by 16%.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 76% of total
revenue in the United States and 24% internationally. This
compares to 67% of total revenue in the United States and 33%
internationally for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The increase in percentage of revenue generated in the United
States was due to sales of Dictaphone products, which are
substantially all in the United States.
The increase in total revenue for the six months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006 was primarily due to $88.8 million of
revenue related to our acquisition of Dictaphone, and to a
lesser extent was due to increases in network revenue, dictation
revenue, embedded revenue and imaging revenue.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 was 76% of total
revenue in the United States and 24% internationally. This
compares to 66% of total revenue in the United States and 34%
internationally for the six months ended March 31, 2006.
The increase in percentage of revenue generated in the United
States was due to sales of Dictaphone products, which are
substantially all in the United States.
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of speech and imaging products and technology. The
following table shows product and licensing revenue in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
|
$
|
48.6
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
146.1
|
|
|
$
|
101.7
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to
$13.0 million of revenue attributable to the acquisition of
Dictaphone. Speech related product and licensing revenue
increased $19.5 million, or 60%, for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006. The growth in speech revenue resulted from
the acquisition of Dictaphone, as well as increased sales of our
dictation products, embedded products, and networked-based
products. Product and licensing revenue from our imaging
products increased by $2.3 million, or 15%, due to
increased sales of our PDF product family. Due to a change in
revenue mix driven primarily by the growth of maintenance and
support revenue, product and licensing revenue as a percentage
of total revenue declined 15% for the three month period ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006.
32
The increase in speech related product and licensing revenue for
the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the
same period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to
$24.9 million of revenue attributable to the acquisition of
Dictaphone. Speech related product and licensing revenue
increased $41.0 million, or 60%, for the six months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006. The growth in speech revenue resulted from
the acquisition of Dictaphone, as well as increased sales of our
dictation products, embedded products and networked-based
products. Product and licensing revenue from our imaging
products increased by $3.3 million, or 10%, due to
increased sales of our PDF product family. Due to a change in
revenue mix driven primarily by the growth of maintenance and
support revenue, product and licensing revenue as a percentage
of total revenue declined 14% for the six month period ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006.
Professional
Services, Subscription and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Subscription and hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering
hosted and
on-site
directory assistance and transcription and dictation services
over a specified term. The following table shows professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
32.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
113
|
%
|
|
$
|
60.8
|
|
|
$
|
30.0
|
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
103
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in professional services, subscription and hosting
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as
compared to the same period ended March 31, 2006, was
primarily due to a $13.3 million increase in revenue
attributable to our acquisition of Dictaphone. The remaining
increase is primarily attributable to an increase in combined
network and embedded consulting services.
The increase in professional services revenue for the six months
ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a $25.0 million
increase in revenue attributable to our acquisition of
Dictaphone. The remaining increase is primarily attributable to
an increase in combined network and embedded consulting services.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance service for speech products including
network, embedded and dictation and transcription products. The
following table shows maintenance and support revenue in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
271
|
%
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
$
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
276
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a
$19.3 million increase in revenue attributable to the
acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a significant number of
maintenance and support contracts. The remaining
$1.8 million increase in maintenance and support revenue is
primarily attributable to an increase in network maintenance and
support contracts.
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the six
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a
$38.9 million increase in revenue attributable to the
33
acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a significant number of
maintenance and support contracts. The remaining
$4.1 million increase in maintenance and support revenue is
primarily attributable to an increase in network maintenance and
support contracts.
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs, third-party royalty expenses, and share-based payments.
The following table shows cost of product and licensing revenue,
in absolute dollars and as a percentage of product and licensing
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
revenue
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
152
|
%
|
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and
licensing revenue
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to
$5.8 million of costs attributable to the acquired
Dictaphone business. As a percentage of product and licensing
revenue, cost of revenue increased 7% for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006. The increase was largely due to the higher
cost of our Dictaphone healthcare products resulting from the
inclusion of third party hardware in the solutions licensed to
customers.
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to
$10.1 million of costs attributable to the acquired
Dictaphone business. As a percentage of product and licensing
revenue, cost of revenue increased 5% for the six months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006. The increase was largely due to the higher
cost of our Dictaphone healthcare products resulting from the
inclusion of third party hardware in the solutions licensed to
customers.
Cost of
Professional Services, Subscription and Hosting
Revenue
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
primarily consists of compensation for consulting personnel,
outside consultants, overhead, and share-based payments, as well
as the hardware and communications fees that support our
subscription and hosted solutions. The following table shows
cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue,
in absolute dollars and as a percentage of professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
22.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
43.1
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of professional services, subscription and
hosting revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007,
as compared to the same period ended March 31, 2006, was
primarily due to a $10.7 million increase in cost
attributable to the acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a large
subscription-based licensing and hosted application customer
base.
34
The increase in cost of professional services, subscription and
hosting revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as
compared to the same period ended March 31, 2006, was
primarily due to a $21.2 million increase in cost
attributable to the acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a large
subscription-based licensing and hosted application customer
base.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead, as well
as share-based payments. The following table shows cost of
maintenance and support revenue, in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of maintenance and support revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
revenue
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
313
|
%
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
286
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and
support revenue
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a
$4.1 million increase in cost attributable to the
acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a significant number of
maintenance and support contracts.
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for the
six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to an
$8.5 million increase in cost attributable to the
acquisition of Dictaphone, which has a significant number of
maintenance and support contracts.
Cost of
Revenue from Amortization of Intangible Assets
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets consists
of the amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology using the straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible
assets periodically or whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our intangible
assets may not be recoverable. The following table shows cost of
revenue from amortization of intangible assets in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in amortization of other intangible assets for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was attributable to a
$0.9 million increase in the amortization of identifiable
technology acquired in connection with our acquisitions of
Dictaphone and MVC, net of a $0.4 million decrease in
amortization expense related to a purchased technology that was
written down to its net realizable value during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006.
The increase in amortization of other intangible assets for the
six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was attributable to a
$1.7 million increase in the amortization of identifiable
technology acquired in connection with our acquisitions of
Dictaphone and MVC, net of a $0.9 million decrease in
amortization expense related to a purchased technology that was
written down to its net realizable value during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006.
35
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries
and benefits, overhead, as well as share-based payments relating
to our engineering staff. The following table shows research and
development expense, in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total research and development
expense
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
$
|
34.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a
$2.5 million increase in compensation related expenses
associated with increased average headcount of 55 employees,
mainly resulting from our acquisition of Dictaphone. The
remaining increase was due to a $1.1 million increase in
outside contractor related expenses and a $1.1 million
increase primarily due to headcount related expenses, including
share-based payments, travel and infrastructure related
expenses. While continuing to increase in absolute dollars,
research and development expense decreased as a percentage of
total revenue. This decrease primarily reflects synergies
resulting from the integration of the research and development
organizations of acquired businesses into our research and
development organization.
The increase in research and development expense for the six
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to a
$4.9 million increase in compensation related expenses
associated with increased average headcount of 42 employees
mainly resulting from our acquisition of Dictaphone. The
remaining increase was due to an increase of $2.3 million
in outside contractor related expenses and a $1.8 million
increase primarily due to other headcount related expenses,
including share-based payments, travel and infrastructure
related expenses. While continuing to increase in absolute
dollars, research and development expense decreased as a
percentage of total revenue. This decrease primarily reflects
synergies resulting from the integration of the research and
development organizations of acquired businesses into our
research and development organization.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
share-based payments, commissions, advertising, direct mail,
public relations, tradeshows and other costs of marketing
programs, travel expenses associated with our sales organization
and overhead. The following table shows sales and marketing
expense in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
$
|
85.7
|
|
|
$
|
53.7
|
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006, was primarily due to an increase of
$11.0 million in compensation and headcount related
expenses, including salaries and commissions, temporary
employees, travel and infrastructure related expenses associated
with increased average headcount of 144 sales employees and 28
marketing employees, mainly resulting from our acquisition of
Dictaphone. The remaining increase was due to a
$3.2 million increase in share-based payments and a
$2.3 million increase in advertising and marketing spending
for existing products as well as healthcare products for
Dictaphone. While continuing to increase in absolute dollars,
sales and marketing expense decreased relative to our total
revenue. This decrease primarily reflects synergies resulting
from the integration of the sales and marketing organizations of
acquired businesses into our sales and marketing organization.
36
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the six months
ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same period ended
March 31, 2006, was primarily due to an increase of
$21.8 million in compensation and headcount related
expenses, including salaries and commissions, temporary
employees, travel and infrastructure related expenses associated
with increased average headcount of 132 sales employees and 24
marketing employees, mainly resulting from our acquisition of
Dictaphone. The remaining increase was due to a
$5.5 million increase in share-based payments and a
$4.7 million increase in advertising and marketing spending
for existing products as well as healthcare products for
Dictaphone. While continuing to increase in absolute dollars,
sales and marketing expense decreased relative to our total
revenue. This decrease primarily reflects synergies resulting
from the integration of the sales and marketing organizations of
acquired businesses into our sales and marketing organization.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs (including share-based payments and other
overhead) for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors including accountants and
attorneys, insurance, and provisions for doubtful accounts. The
following table shows general and administrative expense in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
expense
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
$
|
32.9
|
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006, was due primarily to an increase of
$2.8 million in compensation related expense for increased
headcount and external contractors, and an increase of
$2.6 million in share-based payments. While general and
administrative expense increased in absolute dollars, the
expense decreased as a percent of total revenue. This decrease
primarily reflects synergies resulting from the integration of
the general and administrative organizations of acquired
businesses into our general and administrative organization.
The increase in general and administrative expense for the six
months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period
ended March 31, 2006 was due primarily to an increase of
$4.4 million in share-based payments, and an increase of
$3.9 million in compensation expense for increased
headcount and external contractors. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in legal and
professional service fees. While general and administrative
expense increased in absolute dollars, the expense decreased as
a percent of total revenue. This decrease primarily reflects
synergies resulting from the integration of the general and
administrative organizations of acquired businesses into our
general and administrative organization, as well as lower legal
and professional service fees.
Amortization
of Other Intangible Assets
Amortization of other intangible assets into operating expense
includes amortization of acquired customer and contractual
relationships, non-competition agreements and acquired trade
names and trademarks. Customer relationships are amortized on an
accelerated basis based upon the pattern in which the economic
benefit of customer relationships are being utilized. Other
identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate these
assets for impairment and for appropriateness of their remaining
37
life on an ongoing basis. The following table shows amortization
of other intangible assets in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total amortization and other
intangible assets
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
155
|
%
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
158
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in amortization of other intangible assets for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was attributable to the
amortization of identifiable intangible assets acquired from our
acquisition of Dictaphone on March 31, 2006.
The increase in amortization of other intangible assets for the
six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period ended March 31, 2006, was primarily attributable to
a $5.9 million increase in the amortization of identifiable
intangible assets acquired from our acquisition of Dictaphone on
March 31, 2006.
Restructuring
and Other Charges (Credits), Net
Current activity charged against the restructuring accrual for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 was as follows (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
Cash payments and foreign exchange
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining personnel-related accrual as of March 31,
2007 is primarily composed of amounts due under a restructuring
charge taken in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 which is
expected to be paid during fiscal 2007.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
117
|
%
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
838
|
%
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
744
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
550
|
%
|
|
$
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
1017
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in interest income was primarily due to higher cash
balances and increased interest rates during the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same
periods ended March 31, 2006. The increase in interest
expense was mainly due to interest expense paid, as well as the
amortization of debt issuance costs, associated with the credit
facility we entered into on March 31, 2006. Other income
(expense) principally consisted of foreign exchange gains
(losses) as a result of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
certain of our foreign subsidiaries whose operations are
denominated in other than their local currencies, as well as the
translation of certain of our intercompany balances.
38
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes in
absolute dollars and the effective income tax rate (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(149
|
)%
|
|
|
304
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
%
|
|
|
(350
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes includes provisions for current
and deferred federal, state, and foreign taxes of approximately
$0.9 million and $3.6 million for the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2007, respectively, and an
increase in the valuation allowance of approximately
$0.1 million and $3.7 million for the same periods,
respectively.
The difference between our effective income tax rate and the
federal statutory rate of 35% is due primarily to state income
taxes, the disallowance for tax purposes of certain share-based
compensation charges, and the increase in our valuation
allowance with respect to certain deferred tax assets.
Valuation allowances have been established for our net deferred
tax assets which we believe do not meet the more likely
than not realization criteria established by
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
U.S. deferred tax assets relate primarily to net operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards (resulting both from business
combinations and from operations). Deferred tax liabilities have
been recorded that relate primarily to intangible assets
established in connection with business combinations. Certain of
these intangible assets have indefinite lives, and the resulting
deferred tax liability associated with these assets is not
allowed as an offset to our net deferred tax assets for purposes
of determining the required amount of our valuation allowance.
At March 31, 2007, the amount of deferred tax liability
associated with certain goodwill and indefinite lived
intangibles was approximately $19.5 million.
The utilization of deferred tax assets that were acquired in a
business combination results in a reduction of our valuation
allowance and an increase to goodwill. Our establishment of new
deferred tax assets as a result of operating activities requires
an increase in our valuation allowance and a corresponding
increase to tax expense.
The tax provision also includes state and foreign tax expense as
determined on a legal entity and tax jurisdiction basis.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $89.2 million as of
March 31, 2007, a decrease of $23.1 million as
compared to $112.3 million as of September 30, 2006.
This decrease was composed of cash provided by operating
activities of $61.3 million, offset by the net impact of
cash used in investing of $66.9 million and financing
activities of $17.3 million. Our working capital was
$30.7 million at March 31, 2007 and our accumulated
deficit was $193.1 million. In April 2007, we amended our
2006 Credit Agreement, and received additional net proceeds of
approximately $87.5 million from this amendment, we also
consummated our acquisition of BeVocal in April 2007 and paid
$15.0 million in cash, net of the estimated cash closing
balance of BeVocal, to BeVocals former shareholders. We do
not expect our accumulated deficit will impact our future
ability to operate given our strong cash and financial position.
Cash
provided by operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2007 was $61.3 million, an increase of
$47.0 million, or 329%, as compared to net cash provided by
operating activities of $14.3 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily composed
of $26.4 million, or 127%, relating to the net loss after
adding back non-cash items such as depreciation and
amortization, and share-based payments; in the six
39
months ended March 31, 2007, this amount was
$47.1 million compared to $20.7 million in the
comparable period in fiscal 2006.
Changes in working capital accounts in the fiscal 2007 period
contributed an additional $20.7 million net increase to
cash provided by operating activities. Notably included in the
improved cash flows were: accounts receivable which changed by
$11.6 million, having changed from a use of
$3.3 million in the fiscal 2006 period to a source of
$8.3 million in the fiscal 2007 period; and, accounts
payable and accrued expenses which changed by $10.7 million
in the comparative periods, having changed from a use of
$8.6 million in the fiscal 2006 period to a source of
$2.0 million in the fiscal 2007 period.
Cash used
in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2007 was $66.9 million, as compared to net
cash used in investing activities of $365.6 million for the
six months ended March 31, 2006. The change in cash used in
investing activities was primarily driven by the net cash paid
for acquisitions in each period; in the fiscal 2006 period
$376.8 million was paid, largely relating to the
acquisition of Dictaphone, and in the fiscal 2007 period
$59.1 million was paid, largely relating to the acquisition
of Focus. In fiscal 2006, net proceeds of $17.0 million
relating to net maturities of short-term investments partially
offset the payments made for acquisitions, including the
acquisition of Dictaphone.
Cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2007 was $17.3 million, as compared to net
cash provided by financing activities of $350.2 million for
the six months ended March 31, 2006. The change was
composed primarily of the net receipts of $346.0 million on
the 2006 Credit Facility. Our proceeds from stock option and
other share-based employee benefit plans decreased in the
comparable periods by $10.2 million, from
$25.3 million in the fiscal 2006 period to
$15.1 million in the fiscal 2007 period. Debt payments
increased by $3.3 million in the fiscal 2007 period, due to
payments made under the 2006 Credit Facility discussed above.
Deferred payments on acquisitions increased by $4.2 million
to $18.6 million in the fiscal 2007 period relating to our
2005 acquisitions of ART and Phonetic from $14.4 million in
the fiscal 2006 period. Our repurchase of shares also
contributed to increased cash outflows of $3.7 million in
the fiscal 2007 period.
Credit
Facility
On March 31, 2006 we entered into a senior secured credit
facility, the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006 Credit Facility
consists of a $355.0 million,
7-year term
loan which matures on March 31, 2013 and a
$75.0 million revolving credit line which matures on
March 31, 2012. The available revolving credit line
capacity is reduced, as necessary, to account for letters of
credit outstanding. As of March 31, 2007, there were
$17.4 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no outstanding borrowings
under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) a base rate (which is the higher of the corporate base
rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate plus
0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR determined by reference
to the British Bankers Association Interest Settlement
Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars. The applicable margin
for borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility ranges from 0.50%
to 1.00% per annum with respect to base rate borrowings and
from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum with respect to LIBOR-based
borrowings, depending upon our leverage ratio. As of
March 31, 2007, our applicable margin was 1.00% for base
rate borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. We are
required to pay a commitment fee for unutilized commitments
under the revolving credit facility at a rate ranging from
0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our leverage ratio.
As of March 31, 2007, our commitment fee rate was 0.375%.
We capitalized approximately $9.0 million in debt issuance
costs related to the opening of the 2006 Credit Facility. The
costs associated with the revolving credit facility are being
amortized as interest expense over six years, through March
2012, while the costs associated with the term loan are being
amortized as interest expense over seven years, through March
2013, which is the maturity date of the revolving line and term
facility, respectively under the 2006 Credit Facility. The
effective interest rate method is used to calculate the
amortization of the debt
40
issuance costs for both the revolving credit facility and the
term loan. These debt issuance costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $1.3 million, are included in other assets
in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007.
The $355.0 million term loan is subject to repayment
consisting of a baseline amortization of 1% per annum
($3.55 million per year, due in four equal quarterly
installments), and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the 2006 Credit Facility, which will be first payable
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, based on the
excess cash flow generated in fiscal 2007. As of March 31,
2007, we have repaid $3.6 million of principal under the
term loan agreement. Any borrowings not paid through the
baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or any other
mandatory or optional payments that we may make, will be repaid
upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are made, the
aggregate annual maturities of the term loan would be as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2007 (April 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2007)
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
331,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
351,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the 2006 Credit Facility are
unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions,
each of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries. The 2006 Credit Facility and the
guarantees thereof are secured by first priority liens and
security interests in the following: 100% of the capital stock
of substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the
outstanding voting equity interests and 100% of the non-voting
equity interests of first-tier foreign subsidiaries, material
tangible and intangible assets, and present and future
intercompany debt. The 2006 Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans,
subject to certain exceptions, with: 100% of net cash proceeds
of asset sales, 100% of net cash proceeds of issuance or
incurrence of debt, and 100% of extraordinary receipts. We may
voluntarily prepay the 2006 Credit Facility without premium or
penalty other than customary breakage costs with
respect to LIBOR-based loans.
The 2006 Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our
ability to: incur additional indebtedness, create liens on
assets, enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions,
make investments, make certain acquisitions, sell assets, engage
in mergers or consolidations, pay dividends and distributions or
repurchase our capital stock, engage in certain transactions
with affiliates, change the business conducted by us, amend
certain charter documents and material agreements governing
subordinated indebtedness, prepay other indebtedness, enter into
agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries and enter
into certain derivatives transactions. The 2006 Credit Facility
is governed by financial covenants that include, but are not
limited to, maximum total leverage and minimum interest coverage
ratios, as well as to a maximum capital expenditures limitation.
The 2006 Credit Facility also contains certain customary
affirmative covenants and events of default. As of
March 31, 2007, we were in compliance with the covenants.
On April 5, 2007, we amended our 2006 Credit Facility, and
received additional net proceeds of approximately
$87.5 million. The 2006 Credit Facility and the amendment
provide for the amendment and restatement of our existing
7-year term
facility and
6-year
revolving credit facility (together, the Expanded 2006
Credit Facility). The Expanded 2006 Credit Facility
includes $90 million of additional term debt resulting in a
$442 million term facility due in March 2013 and a
$75 million revolving credit facility due in March 2012.
The additional funds net of debt issuance costs received by us
under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility was used to fund the
cash portion of the merger consideration for the Focus and
BeVocal acquisitions. The Expanded 2006 Credit Facility contains
customary covenants, including, among other things, covenants
that in certain cases restrict our ability and that of our
subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, create or permit
liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions, make
loans or investments, sell assets, make acquisitions, pay
dividends, or repurchase stock.
41
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and marketable securities on hand, will be sufficient to
meet our working capital, investing, financing and contractual
obligations, as they become due for the foreseeable future. We
also believe that in the event future operating results are not
as planned, that we could take actions, including restructuring
actions and other cost reduction initiatives, to reduce
operating expenses to levels which, in combination with expected
future revenue, will continue to generate sufficient operating
cash flow. In the event that these actions are not effective in
generating operating cash flows we may be required to issue
equity or debt securities on less than favorable terms.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of March 31, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
and 2010
|
|
|
and 2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Term loan under credit facility
|
|
$
|
351.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
331.9
|
|
Lease obligations and other term
loan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases and other term loan
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Other lease obligations associated
with the closing of duplicate facilities related to
restructurings and acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Pension, minimum funding
requirement(2)
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments(3)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
assumed(4)
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
504.6
|
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
46.7
|
|
|
$
|
357.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Obligations include contractual lease commitments related to a
facility that was part of a 2005 restructuring plan. As of
March 31, 2007, total gross lease obligations are
$3.2 million and are included in the contractual
obligations herein. The remaining obligations represent
contractual lease commitments associated with the implemented
plans to eliminate duplicate facilities in conjunction with our
acquisition of Former Nuance during fiscal 2005 and our
acquisition of Dictaphone during fiscal 2006, and have been
included as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as
part of purchase accounting. As of March 31, 2007, we have
subleased two of the facilities to unrelated third parties with
total sublease income of $4.1 million through fiscal 2013. |
|
(2) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 (approximately $1,687 million based on the
exchange rate at March 31, 2007) for each of the next
4 years, through fiscal 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts include non-cancelable purchase commitments for
inventory in the normal course of business to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog. |
|
(4) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities relating to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor companies
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of Former Nuance in September
2005. These restructuring programs related to the closing of two
facilities with lease terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012,
respectively. Total contractual obligations under these two
leases are $82.7 million. As of March 31, 2007, we
have
sub-leased
certain of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under contractual
terms is expected to be $20.8 million, which ranges from
$2.7 million to $2.9 million on an annualized basis
through 2016. |
42
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic, we agreed to
make contingent payments of up to $35.0 million upon the
achievement of certain performance targets in accordance with
the purchase agreement. On June 1, 2006, we notified the
former shareholders of Phonetic that the performance targets for
the first scheduled payment of up to $12.0 million were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Phonetic have objected to
this determination. We are currently in discussions with the
former shareholders of Phonetic in regards to this matter.
In connection with our acquisition BeVocal, we agreed to make
contingent payments of up to $60.0 million upon the
achievement of certain performance objectives.
Financial
Instruments
During fiscal 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap with a
notional value of $100 million. The interest rate swap was
entered into as a hedge of the 2006 Credit Facility to
effectively change the characteristics of the interest rate
without actually changing the debt instrument. At its inception,
we documented the hedging relationship and determined that the
hedge is perfectly effective and designated it as a cash flow
hedge. The interest rate swap will hedge the variability of the
cash flows caused by changes in U.S. dollar LIBOR interest
rates. The swap was marked to market at each reporting date. The
fair value of the swap at March 31, 2007 was
$0.6 million which was included in other liabilities.
Changes in the fair value of the cash flow hedge are reported in
stockholders equity as a component of other comprehensive
income.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through March 31, 2007, we have not entered into any off
balance sheet arrangements or transactions with unconsolidated
entities or other persons.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 has as its objective
to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial
instruments and volatility in earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently. It also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The
statement is effective as of the beginning of an entitys
first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early
adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal
year, provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120 days of that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that SFAS 159 may have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2006, the FASB issued EITF
00-19-2,
Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments
or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment
arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included
as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement,
should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. For registration payment arrangements and
financial instruments subject to those arrangements that were
entered into prior to the issuance of EITF
00-19-2,
this guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are
evaluating the impact, if any, that EITF
00-19-2 may
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the over-funded or
under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan
(other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in
its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in
that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires the
measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of
the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of
financial position (with limited exceptions). Under
SFAS 158, we are required to recognize the funded status of
its defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the
required disclosures commencing as of September 30, 2007.
The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations
as of the date of the
43
employers fiscal year-end is effective for our fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. We are evaluating the impact that
SFAS 158 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007. We are
evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have
on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates, which could affect our
operating results, financial position and cash flows. We manage
our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating
and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use
of derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar as compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Israeli New
Shekel, Indian Rupee and Hungarian Forint.
Assuming a 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency
exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency exchange rates
at March 31, 2007, such an appreciation or depreciation
could have an adverse impact on our revenue, operating results
or cash flows.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the 2006 Credit Facility, as amended.
At March 31, 2007, we held approximately $89.2 million
of cash and cash equivalents primarily consisting of cash and
money-market funds. Due to the low current market yields and the
short-term nature of our investments, a hypothetical change in
market rates is not expected to have a material effect on the
fair value of our portfolio or results of operations.
At March 31, 2007, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $351.5 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, we
entered into a $100 million interest rate swap derivative
contract. The interest rate swap is structured to offset period
changes in the variable interest rate without changing the
characteristics of the underlying debt instrument. A
hypothetical change in market rates would have a significant
impact on the interest expense and amounts payable relating to
the $251.5 million of debt that is not offset by the
interest rate swap; assuming a 1.0% change in interest rates,
the interest expense would increase $2.5 million per annum.
44
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as required by
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that we record, process, summarize and report the
information we must disclose in reports that we file or submit
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter
covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
45
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
This information is included in Note 14, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements is incorporated herein by reference from
Item 1 of Part I hereof.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and we expect our revenue and operating results to continue to
fluctuate in the future. Given this fluctuation, we believe that
quarter to quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating
results are not necessarily meaningful or an accurate indicator
of our future performance. As a result, our results of
operations may not meet the expectations of securities analysts
or investors in the future. If this occurs, the price of our
stock would likely decline. Factors that contribute to
fluctuations in our operating results include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our portfolio of
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
concentration of operations with one manufacturing partner and
ability to control expenses related to the manufacture,
packaging and shipping of our boxed software products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition or market conditions;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and other intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
46
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue, and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly
to respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing shareholders and could involve
substantial integration risks.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions of Dictaphone
Corporation, Focus and BeVocal. We may continue to issue equity
securities for future acquisitions, which would dilute our
existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on the
terms of the acquisition. We may also incur additional debt in
connection with future acquisitions, which, if available at all,
may place additional restrictions on our ability to operate our
business. Furthermore, our prior acquisitions required
substantial integration and management efforts. Acquisitions of
this nature involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses, including different and
complex accounting and financial reporting systems;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote units both in the United
States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.
|
As a result of these and other risks, we may not realize
anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Purchase
accounting treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net
income in the foreseeable future, which could have a material
and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we have accounted for our acquisitions using
the purchase method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, we
record the market value of our common stock or other form of
consideration issued in connection with the acquisition and the
amount of direct transaction costs as the cost of acquiring the
company or business. We have allocated that cost to the
individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including
various identifiable intangible assets such as acquired
technology, acquired trade names and acquired customer
relationships based on their respective fair values. Intangible
assets generally will be amortized over a five to ten year
period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite
lives, are not subject to amortization but are subject to at
least an annual impairment analysis, which may result in an
impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its implied fair
value. As of March 31, 2007, we had identified intangible
assets amounting to approximately $230.5 million and
goodwill of approximately $750.8 million.
47
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility.
We have a significant amount of debt. On April 5, 2007, we
entered into an amended and restated credit facility which
consists of a $442.0 million term loan due March 2013 and a
$75.0 million revolving credit line due March 2012. As of
April 30, 2007, $441.5 million remained outstanding
under the term loan and there were no outstanding borrowings
under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could have
important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use of a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on the credit facility, which will reduce
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and
other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of
assets or pay cash dividends.
|
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flow. While we have entered into an interest rate swap
agreement limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, such
agreement does not offer complete protection from this risk.
We
have a history of operating losses, and we may incur losses in
the future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of approximately $3.0 million for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 and $22.9 million,
$5.4 million and $9.4 million for fiscal years 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $193.1 million at March 31, 2007. If we
are unable to achieve and maintain profitability, the market
price for our stock may decline, perhaps substantially. We
cannot assure you that our revenue will grow or that we will
achieve or maintain profitability in the future. If we do not
achieve profitability, we may be required to raise additional
capital to maintain or grow our operations. The terms of any
additional capital, if available at all, may be highly dilutive
to existing investors or contain other unfavorable terms, such
as a high interest rate and restrictive covenants.
We
depend on limited or sole source suppliers for critical
components. The inability to obtain sufficient components as
required, and under favorable purchase terms, would harm our
business.
We are dependent on certain suppliers, including limited and
sole source suppliers, to provide key components used in our
products. We have experienced, and may continue to experience,
delays in component deliveries, which in turn could cause delays
in product shipments and require the redesign of certain
products. In addition, if we are unable to procure necessary
components under favorable purchase terms, including at
favorable prices and with the order lead-times needed for the
efficient and profitable operation of our business, our results
of operations could suffer.
Speech
technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance by
businesses, which could limit our ability to grow our speech
business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of speech technologies.
The market for speech technologies is relatively new and rapidly
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on acceptance of speech technologies in general
and our products in particular. The continued development of the
market for our current and future speech solutions will also
depend on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using speech
technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in speech technology.
|
48
Sales of our speech products would be harmed if the market for
speech technologies does not continue to develop or develops
more slowly than we expect, and, consequently, our business
could be harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with
our investment in our speech technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing, and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within imaging, we compete directly with
ABBYY, Adobe, I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. Within speech, we compete
with AT&T, Fonix, IBM, Microsoft and Philips. Within
healthcare dictation and transcription, we compete with Philips
Medical, Spheris and other smaller providers. In speech, some of
our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel
develop and market products that can be considered substitutes
for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in
both speech and imaging produce technologies or products that
are in some markets competitive with our solutions. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, IBM and Microsoft, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as IBM and Microsoft, have developed
or acquired products or technologies that compete with our
products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected.
Our success will depend substantially upon our ability to
enhance our products and technologies and to develop and
introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products
and features that meet changing customer requirements and
incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as of
September 30, 2005, identified a material weakness in our
internal controls related to tax accounting, primarily as a
result of a lack of necessary corporate accounting resources and
ineffective execution of certain controls designed to prevent or
detect actual or potential misstatements in the tax accounts.
While we have taken remediation measures to correct this
material weakness, which measures are more fully described in
Item 9A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A,
we cannot assure you that we will not have material weaknesses
in our internal controls in the future. Any failure in the
effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial
reporting could have a material adverse impact on our ability to
report our financial results in an accurate and timely manner.
A
significant portion of our revenue and a significant portion of
our research and development are conducted internationally. Our
results could be harmed by economic, political, regulatory and
other risks associated with these international
regions.
Because we license our products worldwide, our business is
subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
We anticipate that revenue from international operations will
continue to increase in the remainder of fiscal 2007. Reported
international revenue, classified by the major geographic areas
in which our customers are
49
located, represented approximately $63.1 million for the
six months ended March 31, 2007 and approximately
$100.2 million, $71.5 million and $39.4 million,
for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively. Most of our
international revenue is generated by sales in Europe and Asia.
In addition, some of our products are developed and manufactured
outside the United States. A significant portion of the
development and manufacturing of our speech products are
completed in Belgium, and a significant portion of our imaging
research and development is conducted in Hungary. In connection
with prior acquisitions we have added research and development
resources in Aachen, Germany, Montreal, Canada and Tel Aviv,
Israel. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a
variety of factors associated with international sales and
operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or declining economic conditions in these countries. In
certain circumstances, we have entered into forward exchange
contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations on
intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries. We use
these contracts to reduce our risk associated with exchange rate
movements, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset any exchange rate losses or gains on the
hedged transaction. We do not engage in foreign currency
speculation. Hedges are designated and documented at the
inception of the hedge and are evaluated for effectiveness
monthly. Forward exchange contracts hedging firm commitments
qualify for hedge accounting when they are designated as a hedge
of the foreign currency exposure and they are effective in
minimizing such exposure. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue projected to increase in the remainder of
fiscal 2007, we are exposed to changes in foreign currencies
including the Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese
Yen, Israeli New Shekel, Indian Rupee and the Hungarian Forint.
Changes in the value of the Euro or other foreign currencies
relative to the value of the U.S. dollar could adversely
affect future revenue and operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
which would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefit of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors which could
trigger an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified. As of March 31, 2007, we had identified
intangible assets amounting to approximately $230.5 million
and goodwill of approximately $750.8 million.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave us, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave us in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave us in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but we
may not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified
personnel in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate,
motivate and retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability to us.
Although we have systems and policies in place for safeguarding
protected health information from unauthorized disclosure, these
systems and policies may not preclude claims against us for
alleged violations of applicable requirements. There can be no
assurance that we will not be subject to liability claims which
could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our
51
products is difficult and we may not be able to protect our
technology from unauthorized use. Additionally, our competitors
may independently develop technologies that are substantially
the same or superior to ours and that do not infringe our
rights. In these cases, we would be unable to prevent our
competitors from selling or licensing these similar or superior
technologies. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do
not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the
laws of the United States. Although the source code for our
proprietary software is protected both as a trade secret and as
a copyrighted work, litigation may be necessary to enforce our
intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others, or to defend against claims of infringement or
invalidity. Litigation, regardless of the outcome, can be very
expensive and can divert management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
On April 10, 2007, Disc Link Corporation (Disc
Link) filed a patent infringement action against us in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Damages are sought in an unspecified amount. In this lawsuit,
Disc Link alleges that we infringe U.S. Patent
No. 6,314,574, titled Information Distribution
System. We are in the early stages of evaluating these
claims and intend to defend the action vigorously.
On November 8, 2006, VoiceSignal Technologies, Inc. filed
an action against us and eleven of our resellers in the United
States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
claiming patent infringement. Damages were sought in an
unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, VoiceSignal alleges that we
are infringing United States Patent No. 5,855,000 which
relates to improving correction in a dictation application based
on a two input analysis. We believe these claims have no merit
and intend to defend the action vigorously.
On May 31, 2006 GTX Corporation (GTX), filed an
action against us in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas claiming patent infringement. Damages
were sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, GTX
alleged that we are infringing United States Patent
No. 7,016,536 entitled Method and Apparatus for
Automatic Cleaning and Enhancing of Scanned Documents. We
believe these claims have no merit and intend to defend the
action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc
(AllVoice) filed an action against us in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
claiming patent infringement. In the lawsuit, AllVoice alleges
that we are infringing United States Patent No. 5,799,273
entitled Automated Proofreading Using Interface Linking
Recognized Words to their Audio Data While Text is Being
Changed (the 273 Patent). The 273
Patent generally discloses techniques for manipulating audio
data associated with text generated by a speech recognition
engine. Although we have several products in the speech
recognition technology field, we believe that our products do
not infringe the 273 Patent because, in addition to other
defenses, they do not use the claimed techniques. Damages are
sought in an unspecified amount. We filed an Answer on
December 23, 2002. The United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas entered summary judgment against
AllVoice and dismissed all claims against Nuance on
February 21, 2006. AllVoice filed a notice of appeal from
this judgment on April 26, 2006. We believe these claims
have no merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
We believe that the final outcome of the current litigation
matters described above will not have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position and results of operations.
However, even if our defense is successful, the
52
litigation could require significant management time and could
be costly. Should we not prevail in these litigation matters, we
may be unable to sell
and/or
license certain of our technologies we consider to be
proprietary, and our operating results, financial position and
cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
Risks
Related to Our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our two largest stockholders may enable them to
influence matters requiring stockholder approval.
On March 19, 2004, Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock held
by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80 million.
Additionally, on May 9, 2005 and September 15, 2005 we
sold shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase common
stock to Warburg Pincus for aggregate gross proceeds of
approximately $75.1 million. As of March 31, 2007,
Warburg Pincus beneficially owned approximately 23% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,066,538 shares of our common stock and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Friess Associates LLC. is our second largest stockholder,
owning approximately 5% of our common stock as of March 31,
2007. Because of their large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, each of these two stockholders
acting individually, or together, have a strong influence over
matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. While we
cannot predict the individual effect that these factors may have
on the market price of our common stock, these factors, either
individually or in the aggregate, could result in significant
volatility in our stock price during any given period of time.
Moreover, companies that have experienced volatility in the
market price of their stock often are subject to securities
class action litigation. If we were the subject of such
litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
53
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(c)
We have not publicly announced any currently effective
authorization to repurchase shares of our common stock. However,
following our acquisition of Mobile Voice Control, Inc. we
agreed to repurchase a portion of the shares issued to the
former shareholders of Mobile Voice Control, Inc. as
consideration in the transaction. The following table summarizes
the repurchases of our common stock during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 through
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
261,422
|
|
|
$
|
12.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2007 through
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2007 through
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
261,422
|
|
|
$
|
12.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
54
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
On March 22, 2007, we held our annual meeting of
stockholders. At that meeting the following actions were voted
upon:
(a) To elect a Board of nine (9) directors to hold
office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until
their respective successors have been elected and qualified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Votes For
|
|
|
Votes Withheld
|
|
|
Paul A. Ricci
|
|
|
155,120,794
|
|
|
|
3,050,455
|
|
Charles W. Berger
|
|
|
146,393,058
|
|
|
|
11,778,191
|
|
Robert J. Frankenberg
|
|
|
148,312,822
|
|
|
|
9,858,427
|
|
Jeffrey A. Harris
|
|
|
156,759,460
|
|
|
|
1,411,789
|
|
William H. Janeway
|
|
|
156,606,431
|
|
|
|
1,564,818
|
|
Katharine A. Martin
|
|
|
146,399,522
|
|
|
|
11,771,727
|
|
Mark B. Myers
|
|
|
157,014,532
|
|
|
|
1,156,717
|
|
Philip J. Quigley
|
|
|
157,026,084
|
|
|
|
1,145,165
|
|
Robert G. Teresi
|
|
|
155,529,670
|
|
|
|
2,641,579
|
|
(b) To approve the amended and restated 2000 Stock Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker
|
|
Votes For
|
|
|
Votes Against
|
|
|
Abstained
|
|
|
Non-Votes
|
|
|
|
89,362,966
|
|
|
|
17,910,473
|
|
|
|
250,519
|
|
|
|
50,647,291
|
|
(c) To approve an amendment to our certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock
we are authorized to issue from 280 million shares to
560 million shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker
|
|
Votes For
|
|
|
Votes Against
|
|
|
Abstained
|
|
|
Non-Votes
|
|
|
|
141,793,99
|
|
|
|
16,114,478
|
|
|
|
262,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) To ratify the appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker
|
|
Votes For
|
|
|
Votes Against
|
|
|
Abstained
|
|
|
Non-Votes
|
|
|
|
157,445,900
|
|
|
|
555,067
|
|
|
|
170,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index hereto are filed
or incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Burlington, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, on May 10, 2007.
Nuance Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ James
R. Arnold, Jr.
|
James R. Arnold, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
56
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by
and among Nuance Communications, Inc., Beryllium Acquisition
Corporation, Beryllium Acquisition LLC and BeVocal, Inc. dated
as of February 21, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2/27/2007
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated
March 13, 2007 by and among Nuance Communications, Inc.,
Bethany Advisors Inc., Focus Softek India (Private) Limited and
U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow Agent.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
3/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by
and among Nuance Communications, Inc., Phoenix Merger Sub, Inc.
and Dictaphone Corporation dated as of February 7, 2006.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2/9/2006
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and
Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
333-142182
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock
Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
3/28/2007
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of April 5, 2007, among Nuance
Communications, Inc., the Lenders party thereto from time to
time, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent, Citicorp
North America, Inc., as syndication agent, Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, as documentation agent, Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers,
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Banc Of America
Securities LLC, as co-arrangers, and Citigroup Global Markets
INC., UBS Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
as joint bookrunners.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
4/10/2007
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of
April 5, 2007, among Nuance, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as
administrative agent, Citicorp North America, INC., as
syndication agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
documentation agent, the Lenders, Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint
bookrunners, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint
bookrunner and co-arranger, and Banc Of America Securities LLC,
as co-arranger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
4/10/2007
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan of arrangement. |
58