e10vk
2007Weathering the Perfect Banking Storm
What Can Wintrust Do?
Treasury Management
|
|
|
|
|
Retail & Wholesale Lockbox |
|
|
|
|
|
On-Line Lockbox (iBusinessPay) |
|
|
|
|
|
On-Line Banking & Reporting (iBusinessBanking) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remote Deposit Capture (iBusinessCapture) |
|
|
|
|
|
Merchant Card Program |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Services (CheckMate) |
|
|
|
|
|
ACH & Wire Transfer Services |
|
|
|
|
|
International Banking Services |
Commercial Lending
|
|
|
|
|
Lending limit of greater than $180 million |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Industrial (Asset Based) Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate, Mortgages & Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Property & Casualty Insurance Premium Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Financing |
Retail Banking
|
|
|
|
|
Footprint of 15 chartered banks and 77 facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit Products |
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity and Installment Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgages |
Wealth Management
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Management (Individual & Institutional) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage |
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans (Business) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust & Estate Services (Corporate & Personal) |
Specialized Financial Services for:
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Owners |
|
|
|
|
|
Building Management Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
Condominium & Homeowner Associations |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Agents & Brokers |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipalities & School Districts |
|
|
|
|
|
Physicians, Dentists and other medical personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Staffing & Security Companies |
Contents
We have always had a policy of presenting our goals, objectives and financial results in an up
front manner to our shareholders. In this annual report, we are confirming our policy of reporting
thoroughly the financial results, accounting policies and objectives of Wintrust Financial
Corporation and our operating subsidiaries.
Selected Financial Trends
Note: M=Million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Selected Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Condition Data
(at end of year): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,368,859 |
|
|
$ |
9,571,852 |
|
|
$ |
8,177,042 |
|
|
$ |
6,419,048 |
|
|
$ |
4,747,398 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
|
|
5,213,871 |
|
|
|
4,348,346 |
|
|
|
3,297,794 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
7,471,441 |
|
|
|
7,869,240 |
|
|
|
6,729,434 |
|
|
|
5,104,734 |
|
|
|
3,876,621 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
415,183 |
|
|
|
325,531 |
|
|
|
349,317 |
|
|
|
303,501 |
|
|
|
144,026 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,662 |
|
|
|
249,828 |
|
|
|
230,458 |
|
|
|
204,489 |
|
|
|
96,811 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
|
773,346 |
|
|
|
627,911 |
|
|
|
473,912 |
|
|
|
349,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statements of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
261,550 |
|
|
$ |
248,886 |
|
|
$ |
216,759 |
|
|
$ |
157,824 |
|
|
$ |
120,492 |
|
Net revenue
(1) |
|
|
341,638 |
|
|
|
340,118 |
|
|
|
310,316 |
|
|
|
243,276 |
|
|
|
193,084 |
|
Net income |
|
|
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
|
51,334 |
|
|
|
38,118 |
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
Core net interest margin(2) |
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
Non-interest income to average assets |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
Non-interest expense to average assets |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
Efficiency ratio (4) |
|
|
71.06 |
|
|
|
66.96 |
|
|
|
63.97 |
|
|
|
64.45 |
|
|
|
63.52 |
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
7.64 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
13.12 |
|
|
|
14.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
$ |
9,442,277 |
|
|
$ |
8,925,557 |
|
|
$ |
7,587,602 |
|
|
$ |
5,451,527 |
|
|
$ |
4,116,618 |
|
Average total shareholders equity |
|
|
727,972 |
|
|
|
701,794 |
|
|
|
609,167 |
|
|
|
391,335 |
|
|
|
265,495 |
|
Ending loan-to-deposit ratio |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
82.6 |
% |
|
|
77.5 |
% |
|
|
85.2 |
% |
|
|
85.1 |
% |
Average loans to average deposits ratio |
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
Average interest earning assets to
average interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
106.93 |
|
|
|
107.78 |
|
|
|
108.83 |
|
|
|
109.89 |
|
|
|
109.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
Allowance for credit losses(5) to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
Non-performing loans |
|
|
70.81 |
|
|
|
126.14 |
|
|
|
155.69 |
|
|
|
184.13 |
|
|
|
107.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data at end of year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
$ |
33.13 |
|
|
$ |
48.02 |
|
|
$ |
54.90 |
|
|
$ |
56.96 |
|
|
$ |
45.10 |
|
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
31.56 |
|
|
$ |
30.38 |
|
|
$ |
26.23 |
|
|
$ |
21.81 |
|
|
$ |
17.43 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,430,490 |
|
|
|
25,457,935 |
|
|
|
23,940,744 |
|
|
|
21,728,548 |
|
|
|
20,066,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data at end of year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank subsidiaries |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Banking offices |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income. |
|
(2) |
|
The core net interest margin excludes the effect of the net interest expense associated with the Companys junior
subordinated debentures and the interest expense incurred to fund common stock repurchases. |
|
(3) |
|
The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income and
dividing by that periods total average assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent net
revenues (less securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient revenue generation. |
|
(5) |
|
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments. |
To Our Fellow Shareholders
Welcome to Wintrust Financial Corporations 2007
annual report. We thank you for being a shareholder.
Market Headwinds
For the first 14 years of Wintrusts
existence, our community bank philosophy and related
customer service levels produced a company that enjoyed
growth rates substantially above industry standards.
We committed the capital and a lot of hard work to take
advantage of a banking industry that seemed to be
turning its back on providing good old fashioned
customer service. However, in 2007, management decided
to temporarily suspend historical growth patterns due
to a number of environmental factors that limited profitable growth.
As we noted in our 2006 Annual Report, the banking
environment was characterized by a disadvantageous
inverted yield curve, a loosened lending environment
devoid of credit spreads and substantial market
liquidity. This resulted in intense price competition.
In essence, profitable growth at acceptable risk
levels was taken away a tough occurrence for all banks
but especially a growth - oriented bank such as ours. It
also seemed apparent that a negative credit cycle
was soon to be upon us as we continued to see loan
deals get done by many different competitors with what
we considered unacceptable underwriting terms.
This seems to be the perfect storm that formed
throughout the past two years in the banking and
financial services industry. The environment has
produced strong headwinds for almost everyone in the
banking sector.
Our Response and Strategies in Place
Our response to the unfavorable
environment was to stay committed to our
core loan underwriting standards and not
sacrifice our asset quality or pricing
standards simply to grow outstanding
loan balances and short-term profits.
Our sincere belief is that if a bank
forsakes credit quality in the short
run, it will ultimately give back all of
the short-term profits many times over
in the form of credit losses down the
road. Accordingly, since the
marketplace was not allowing for
profitable growth within acceptable risk
parameters, we made a conscious
decision to not commit the Companys
capital to growth that did not produce
acceptable returns. Rather, we decided
to allocate our capital to growing our
younger banks and actually shrinking the
larger banks by allowing high cost
non-core customer relationships to exit.
By slowing the growth, we were able to
use excess capital to repurchase common
stock an investment that we think was
sound given the alternatives.
Just as it may take sailors slightly longer to get to
their destination when facing headwinds, we have not
sacrificed our long-term growth for short-term profit
strategies. We believe that we are sitting in an
advantageous spot due to our strategic measures taken
during 2007. We maintained our strict adherence to our
high core loan underwriting standards, focused more
heavily on deposit pricing discipline, worked to
shift our deposit mix to be less dependent on higher
cost fixed-rate certificates of deposit (CDs), and focused more on expense control.
We say we believe we are in an advantageous spot
because we think that those banks that stayed true to
their credit underwriting standards over the past few
years will not be burdened by troubled loan portfolios
going forward. We think we are one of those banks who have
kept our powder dry to fight the ongoing battle and take advantage of future opportunities.
Wintrust is now positioned to resume its
previously successful growth strategies. We believe that 2008
will be a year of opportunities on the lending side of
the business as many banks are fighting credit issues.
Market liquidity has dried up to a certain extent and
there has been much disruption in Chicago banking due
to several local bank acquisitions.
In fact, at year-end 2007, our loan-to-deposit ratio
was north of 90% making us asset driven again. Being
asset driven allows us to get more aggressive on
growing the franchise while also allowing for the sale
of excess asset generation to take place thereby
augmenting income.
Make no mistake, our overall core
strategies have remained the same over
the years except for this temporary
change in tactics. It is our hope that
when this credit cycle is over, our
investments in the Companys core
strategies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
will payoff over the long term with a greater base to
generate earnings and increased franchise value to shareholders. We have a resolute interest
in growing earnings and our balance sheet for all of our franchises but only if we can do
so in a safe and sound manner.
Credit Back to Normal
We believe our consistent underwriting standards
are geared towards incurring credit losses in the range
of 20-30 basis points of average loans which was
generally our history from 1991 to 2003. The last few
years have been extraordinarily good from a credit loss
perspective and our loss ratios have been below the
expected range. However, as we have indicated before,
we believe the current credit cycle may result in loss
ratios closer to pre-2004 levels. In providing you
with our best estimates, we are keenly aware that these
are uncertain times and no one is larger than the
market. The banking business is one where we take
measured risks every day through investments in loans
and other earning assets. The key is to control the
risk and get paid an appropriate amount for taking such
risk. We truly believe that we have always maintained
consistent underwriting standards that should control
risk and limit losses to acceptable levels.
Mortgage Market Turmoil How
We Weathered the Storm
Surely you have all heard or read about the huge
problems experienced by the mortgage industry as a
whole in 2007. During 2007, our Company originated in
excess of
$1.9 billion of mortgage loans. We sell the majority
of those long-term fixed rate loans to the secondary
market in order to reduce interest rate risk. As a
condition to selling those loans, we generally retain
certain recourse obligations in the event of early
payment defaults, misrepresentation of warranties and
other matters. As a result of the rapid change in the
dynamics of the marketplace, we recorded losses
related to those recourse obligations and valuations of
mortgages held for sale of approximately $4 million,
after-tax. To put this into perspective, this is only
about one quarter of one percent of the amount of loans
originated. Although we are obviously not pleased with
any loss, we do believe it was relatively
insignificant compared to the total amount originated
during the year. However, we have revised our
underwriting standards to limit the exposure to this
type of loss in the future. Separately, we are
optimistic about the mortgage market in 2008. The
lower rate environment that we are currently
experiencing should drive more origination volume from
customers refinancing their existing mortgages. We
continue to add mortgage personnel throughout our
banking locations which should help increase mortgage
loan production during 2008.
Net Interest Margin Challenges
The Companys net interest margin remained stable in
2007, with an actual uptick of one basis point to
3.11%. Our core net interest margin, which excludes
interest expense associated with Wintrusts junior subordinated debentures and the interest
expense incurred to fund common stock repurchases,
increased six basis points to 3.38%.
The interest margin challenges faced by all banks
in 2007 are well known: loan pricing pressures, rate
cuts by the Federal Reserve and a yield curve not
quite recovered from its recent inversion. However,
the Company took necessary steps to lower its cost of
funds with better deposit pricing discipline and
rebalancing its deposit mix from higher cost fixed-rate savings
vehicles such as CDs to lower rate savings vehicles
like money market, savings and NOW accounts. At the
same time, industry underwriting and lending terms
appear to be returning to the norm. The return of
credit spreads and sound underwriting standards in the
industry should allow us to better compete on a variety
of lending opportunities, while still allowing us to be
compensated for our time and risk. However, despite
some of these encouraging signs, progress made could
very well be offset by the margin compression caused by
continued rate cuts by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Repurchasing Shares
of Common Stock
Beginning in the
later half of 2006,
the Company began to
repurchase its common
shares under plans
approved by the Board
of Directors. Given
declining stock price
multiples in the
banking sector and
our decision to slow
growth due to
unacceptable market
conditions, we
thought the
repurchase of our
shares was a sound
investment. In total,
since the July 2006
Board authorization,
we have repurchased
approximately 2.8
million shares at an
average price under
$43 per share.
Accordingly,
approximately 11% of
the common shares of
the Company have been
repurchased.
In January 2008, the Company authorized the repurchase
of up to another one million shares of our common stock.
Our decision to continue our share repurchase program
demonstrates the Companys confidence in its long-term
growth and commitment towards building shareholder
value. Going forward, we will be selective in
repurchasing shares while monitoring growth during the
year and making sure we maintain sufficient capital to
support growth opportunities.
Our Newest Addition to the Family
On November 1, 2007, the Company announced the
completion of its acquisition of 100% of the ownership
interests of Broadway Premium Funding Corporation
(Broadway). Broadway was founded in 1999 and had
approximately $60 million of premium finance
receivables outstanding at the date of acquisition.
Broadway provides financing for commercial property,
casualty and professional insurance premiums, mainly
through insurance agents and brokers in the
northeastern portion of the United States and
California. Broadway, now a subsidiary of the Companys
FIRST Insurance Funding (FIRST) premium finance unit,
expands the footprint of our commercial premium finance
receivables niche and serves a segment of small- to
mid-sized businesses not previously covered by FIRST.
We welcome the Broadway team to the Wintrust family and
are excited about the growth opportunities that exist
in their niche of the premium finance market.
The Big Banks and Merger Mania
Over the course of 2007, there were a
couple of highly publicized bank mergers
that affected the markets where our
current banks compete. This creates a beneficial environment for the Company as
mergers and
acquisitions set money in motion. Suddenly, a client that used to be a big
fish in a small pond at one of the acquired institutions sees the pond increase in size comparable to an ocean.
Wintrust is
uniquely
positioned to
capture not only
retail customers,
but new
commercial clients as
well. Our philosophy of providing the same or
better big bank products, coupled with community bank
service we are known for, is ideal for this
opportunity. We get back to our bread-and-butter and
key differentiator, allowing us to position ourselves
as having the best customer service around.
As a result, we have gone on the offensive and begun to
use the Wintrust brand for the first time in the
commercial banking landscape. This includes
advertisements, direct mail and other marketing
collateral. We hope you enjoy the many Wintrust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
commercial customers featured in the Client
Profiles or in the Clients Having It All sections
appearing throughout this Annual Report.
Our Key Advantage of Service, Service, Service
As we have continually stated, our key advantage is our
people. Our dedicated staff constantly carries forward
our mantra of Service, Service, Service.
Our decentralized management approach allows senior
management at each franchise to manage their company
and their employees. These employees are the key to
our success. Our clients and customers truly appreciate
the unparalleled service that our valued employees
provide.
Giving Thanks
As is customary in our letter to shareholders we feel a
debt of gratitude and feel some thank yous are in
order. Lets start by thanking our leadership
teamsour management and directors. Your stewardship
and efforts are an important reason for our success.
Thank you.
And then lets thank our employees and welcome
those who recently joined our Wintrust team, either
from our acquisition of Broadway Premium Funding, or
the launch of one of our new bank facilities, or by
joining an existing member of our family. As previously
mentioned, our dedicated employees provide our clients
and customers the best service around. Thank you.
Thanks as well to our shareholders for keeping us
focused on what we do best growing our franchises by
delivering products uniquely positioned to meet the financial needs of consumers with the key
differentiator of service.
And finally, thank you to our clients and
customers banking, lending, mortgage, wealth
management, premium finance, employment agencies for
trusting us to deliver our products and services.
Without you, we dont exist. Thank you.
In Summary
Muhammad Ali coined a phrase that we think is
applicable to our current state of mind as a Company.
He developed a strategy he called, Rope-a-Dope, with
the idea to lie on the ropes of a boxing ring, conserve
energy and allow the opponent to strike him repeatedly
in hopes of making him tire and open up weaknesses to
exploit for the inevitable counterattack, which would
eventually lead to victory.
We see 2007 as a year of conserving energy and are
poised to push off the ropes with gloves off as we
hopefully are quick to come out of the current credit
cycle and yield environment.
Your continued support of our business is greatly
appreciated and we are excited about making 2008 a good
year for the Company. Please enjoy the rest of our 2007
Annual Report. We hope to see you at our Annual
Meeting, to be held on Thursday, May 22, 2008 at
10:00a.m. It will be held at the Deer Path Inn located
at 255 East Illinois Road in Lake Forest, Illinois.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John S. Lillard
|
|
Edward J. Wehmer
|
|
David A. Dykstra |
Chairman
|
|
President &
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President
& |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Financial Performance
In 2007, total assets remained relatively unchanged
from 2006, and earnings suffered due to a challenging
interest rate environment and other market conditions
previously discussed. However, the Company did achieve
a record level of loans as we surpassed the $6.8
billion mark.
Core Growth
Though growth was not at the level our shareholders
have come to expect, our core balance sheet remains
strong. Total assets of $9.4 billion were near our 2006
record of $9.6 billion. Furthermore, the Company has
doubled in size in a five-year period, which is a
substantial achievement, especially in the competitive
financial services industry.
Earnings per diluted share decreased to $2.24 in
2007 from $2.56 in 2006. Shareholders equity also
decreased as a consequence of the repurchase of our
common shares. The amount of treasury stock increased
substantially from 2006 as the Company continued to
repurchase shares, a demonstration of our belief that
our stock was undervalued and represented a good
investment relative to other investment alternatives.
Despite the treasury stock purchases, book value per
common share increased by $1.18, or 3.9%, to $31.56.
Net Revenue
Overall net revenue, which includes net
interest income and non-interest
income, increased 0.4% to $341.6
million. Our net interest margin
remained relatively stable at 3.11% in
2007, up one basis point from the prior
year, as we continued to face extremely
competitive loan and deposit pricing
pressures.
Most banking institutions, ours
included, have been affected by the
inverted yield
curve. When long-term interest rates
are lower than short-term interest
rates, it squeezes the spread between
interest earned on our assets and
interest paid on liabilities. While the
curve has been begun to move toward a
normal positive-sloping shape, the
Federal Reserve Banks rate cuts make
for a complicated operating
environment. Lower interest rates are
generally not favorable to community
bank organizations because interest
spreads get compressed. Rates on lower
cost deposits generally can not be
lowered as much as the Federal
Reserves rate cuts. Asset yields,
however, are not so constrained. To
counteract deposit pricing pressures,
the Company has begun to make progress
in shifting its mix of retail deposits
away from high-rate CDs into lower
cost, variable-rate NOW, money market
and wealth management deposits.
Our other main source of revenue, non-interest
income, fell 12.2% in 2007 to $80.1 million. The
decrease was primarily attributed to $8.5 million
less of trading income recognized on interest rate
swaps in 2006 and a decline in mortgage banking revenue
of $7.5 million. Offsetting these two large decreases
were the BOLI death benefit recorded in the third
quarter of 2007, the gain recognized on the Companys
investment in an unaffiliated bank holding company that
was acquired by another bank holding company and the
gain recognized on the sale of Company owned land.
Asset Quality
At December 31, 2007, non-performing assets were
$75.7 million, or 0.81%, of total
assets, compared to $37.4 million, or
0.39%, of total assets at December 31, 2006. The
increase in non-performing assets is
concentrated in three credit
relationships. These relationships are
being carefully monitored with
work-out plans in process.
We believe our consistent underwriting
standards are geared towards incurring
credit losses in the range of 20-30
basis
You have all the parts for our commercial banking
needs. By understanding what we are trying to do as a
business, you know what needs to get done, and you
take care of it quickly for us.
Brian and Greg Panek, Panek Precision
I switched from my old bank to a Wintrust Community
Bank because they provide personal service, theyre
always available and most importantly they
understand the business.
Marc Kresmery, Marc Kresmery Construction LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
points, which was
generally our
history from 1991
to 2003. The last few
years have been
extraordinarily
good from a credit
loss perspective.
As we have
indicated before,
we believe the
current credit
cycle may result in
loss ratios closer
to pre-2004 levels.
Both
non-performing
assets and net
charge-offs
increased in 2007,
but are at levels
that are within
acceptable
operating ranges
and are as
expected. Sound
asset quality has
always been a basic
operating tenet for
us and we are
committed to
maintaining a good
quality loan
portfolio. As mentioned
earlier, we believe
the current credit
cycle may result in
higher loss ratios
in 2008, but
hopefully only back
to the historical
levels we
experienced prior
to 2004. We
believe that the
allowance for loan
losses is adequate
to provide for
inherent losses in
the portfolio.
Dividend Payouts
In January and July of 2007, our Board of Directors
approved semiannual cash dividends of $0.16 per share
of outstanding common stock. These dividends were paid
in February and August. This annualized cash dividend of
$0.32 per share represented a 14% increase over the per
share common stock dividends paid during 2006.
And in January 2008, our Board approved a
semi-annual cash dividend of $0.18 per share of
outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on
February 21, 2008, to shareholders of record as of
February 7, 2008. This cash dividend, on an annualized
basis, represents a 13%
increase over the per share common stock dividends
paid during 2007. Following is a historical summary of
our increasing dividend distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
Dividend |
|
Dividend |
Year |
|
Earnings |
|
Per Share |
|
Payout Ratio |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.320 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
0.280 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
0.240 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
0.200 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
2002 |
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
0.160 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
2001 |
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
0.120 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
While we have increased our dividend every year since
we initiated payment of dividends, we continue to
retain the majority of our earnings to fund future
growth and to build a strong, long-term franchise.
Although the payment of future dividends will be
subject to our Boards periodic review of the financial
condition, earnings, and capital requirements of the
Company, it is our present intent to continue paying
regular semiannual cash dividends.
I switched from my old bank because you make banking the way it used to be I get personal
service, even though I am hundreds of miles away. Wintrust is more flexible than the larger banks,
with tailored products and services that fit my needs.
John Petrakis, McDonalds Owner/Operator, Orlando, FL
Our Banking and Wealth Management Locations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Our Other Locations and Our Brands
FIRST Insurance/Broadway Premium Finance, Tricom Funding, and WestAmerica Mortgage Distribution
Our Bank Brands
Our Other Brands
Retail Banking
As we have grown over the years, many wonder how
we can stay true to our community banking model. With
15 chartered banks and 77 facilities, it may seem like
a challenging task to outsiders. However, our
decentralized, multi-chartered approach means that our
local leadership teams maintain proper focus on the
communities we serve and on our customers.
In 2007, we made a renewed commitment to the customer
service experience. We sent mystery shoppers to our
retail facilities to gauge how well we are satisfying
customer needs and implementing cross-sell initiatives.
The shopping results showed that the consistency of the
retail experience across our 15 chartered banks is
solid, but can always be improved. In a tough interest
rate environment where it does not make sense to
compete on rates, we believe more than ever before
that top-notch customer service is our strongest
point of differentiation.
Below is a chart of FDIC deposit market share as of
June 30, 2007, for each Wintrust main bank zip code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
De Novo |
|
Acquisition |
|
Share |
Bank |
|
Opening |
|
Date |
|
Rank |
|
1. Lake Forest Bank |
|
|
12/91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 (out of 10) |
2. Hinsdale Bank |
|
|
10/93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 (out of 14) |
3. North Shore Bank |
|
|
9/94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 (out of 7) |
4. Libertyville Bank |
|
|
10/95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 (out of 9) |
5. Barrington Bank |
|
|
12/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 (out of 9) |
6. Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
12/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 (out of 15) |
7. Northbrook Bank |
|
|
11/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 (out of 14) |
8. Advantage Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/03 |
|
|
2 (out of 15) |
9. Village Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/03 |
|
|
1 (out of 10) |
10. Beverly Bank |
|
|
4/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 (out of 9) |
11. Wheaton Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/04 |
|
|
3 (out of 19) |
12. Town Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/04 |
|
|
1 (out of 5) |
13. State Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/05 |
|
|
1 (out of 8) |
14. Old Plank Bank |
|
|
3/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 (out of 13) |
15. St. Charles Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/06 |
|
|
16 (out of 20) |
|
With aggressive marketing, all retail locations are
striving increase penetration into their markets and increase market share. The tried-and-true approach
is to erode the market share of big bank competitors.
Bank mergers and acquisitions in the Chicagoland area
generally assist us in this task. We are
well-positioned as a customer-centric alternative to
the big banks in our markets. This positioning is
central to our continued retail growth.
Indeed, as the true community banks in our
markets, we provide a number of value-added services
that the big banks cant or wont offer. From community
shredding days to credit scoring seminars to events for
children via our Junior Savers Club to travel clubs for
our senior citizen customers, our banks are clearly
more than just a place to make deposits. We are fully
invested in the communities we serve, and it doesnt
just stop at the bank level. Our bankers are actively
involved in their communities and local organizations,
effectively putting community interests first in all
they do.
Commercial Banking
In 2006, Wintrust banks enhanced the infrastructure,
sales people and products to better enable us to go
headtohead with larger banks. This year proved to be an
opportune time for our aggressive rollout and
positioning of these services. Big banks were
swallowing up the banking leaders in our Chicago bank
market. For the first time in our Companys history we began
marketing the Wintrust Financial Corporation name to
establish a brand in the commercial banking arena.
Our efforts started with a letter to the top 100
personal banking customers for each individual bank
brand that were identified as local businesspersons.
The letter introduced
Wintrust, but also positioned the bank as locally
managed, with local decision making authority.
However, we let them in on the fact their local
community bank is not just that. Behind their
community bank and its superior customer service is a
larger financial services company. The response was
favorable with many customers surprised and receptive
to the news. They know that
My Wintrust Bank is easy to do business with, trusting, accommodating and flexible. They have
been great to work with and have made business easier by customizing products to fit my companys
specific needs.
Todd Augustine, President, Augustine Custom Homes, Inc., Fox Valley Homebuilders
Association
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
our community banks develop and foster relationships,
both in personal and commercial banking.
Given the favorable response to our initial efforts,
the Company followed up with advertising in local and
regional business publications. The original
advertisements (three of the four can be viewed on page
6) were based upon one of our more historically
successful anti-big bank merger advertisements. From
July to December, we ran this campaign of four
advertisements, followed with direct mail pieces to
targeted commercial and small business lists. The
response to our commercial banking initiative has been
gratifying. We will continue to pursue growth in this
area as we truly believe we can competitively offer all
the commercial services that our customers need and do
so in a more tailored fashion than our large bank
competitors.
Wintrust has also developed a few specialty
divisions as needs have become apparent within our
commercial banking business. Wintrust Commercial Realty
Advisors, based out of our Northbrook Bank, provides
brokering services to some of our commercial
relationships for loans that do no necessarily fit the
criteria for our Banks loan portfolios. Yet, we maintain the primary relationship and receive fees
for this service. Wintrust Government Funds is charged
with assisting our Banks in the municipal, school
districts and other institutional arenas. Physicians
Financial Care, based out of our Barrington and Village
Banks, is providing specialized, personal and commercial
banking, as well as financial planning needs to doctors
in our market areas.
For 2008, Wintrust plans to continue aggressive
commercial marketing to further spread our message of
community bank service, backed by big bank resources
and technology. Our clients Have It All and we want
prospective clients to know they can too.
At Plastic Bottle Corporation, Im committed to my customers, employees and vendors. I believe in
trust and integrity. I expect that from my bank as well, and thats what I get from our banking
relationship. We mold plastic bottles, you mold relationships. Youve wanted to understand our
business first, and then help with our financial needs. Its a relationship that works.
- Stuart Feen, President, Plastic Bottle Corporation
Update on Our Other Companies
Wayne Hummer Wealth Management
As one of the oldest and most successful
Chicago-based wealth management organizations, Wayne Hummer
Wealth Management (Wayne Hummer) has more than 170 professionals, over
15,000 clients and approximately $7 billion in client
assets under administration. Wayne Hummer marked its fifth year as a Wintrust company in 2007, and it has
grown from just two offices to 23 branch locations,
mostly in our community banks, in that time.
A provider of
comprehensive
wealth management
services including
financial planning,
investments, trust
services, asset
management and
insurance, Wayne
Hummer has a
strong heritage of
ethics, integrity,
client service and
dependability. We
offer all the
products,
technology and
capabilities of a
national company
with the personal
service and
attention of a
boutique wealth
management firm.
The strategy of cross-selling Wintrust
bank customers our wealth management products
and services is working. For 2007, Wayne
Hummers referral program generated more than
2,400 referrals from over 350 Wintrust bankers.
Both clients and our bankers are realizing the
benefits of getting a complete array of
financial solutions from their hometown bank.
Significant investments have been made in the core
business as well. In October 2007, Wayne Hummer moved
its headquarters to a new location right above Union
Station in downtown Chicago. The move allowed Wayne
Hummer to centralize all downtown employees to a single
floor, resulting in better servicing of our clients
needs. We also added 12 net new wealth managers to
our stable of professionals.
Since the acquisition of the Wayne Hummer Companies in
2002, we have focused on providing smooth
integration of all the wealth management units together
and into our banking network. We have successfully
established one brand image and upgraded the
capabilities throughout the wealth management system.
The trust arm of the wealth management companies
continues to have success in servicing existing
customers and attracting new ones. In fact, in 2007,
the trust assets under administration surpassed the $1
billion level.
Likewise, our brokerage business
continues to grow its revenue base after
significant investments in state-of-the-art
systems and upgraded product offerings. Growth
associated with Financial Advisors located in
our banking locations is especially promising
with most reporting double-digit growth in
their brokerage revenue.
The third aspect of the
wealth management business is
asset management, an area we are targeting for significant future growth.
In order to
provide for the
growth of this
important aspect of
the business
model, it was
essential that we
supplement our
existing talent
base to provide
the appropriate
infrastructure for
growth. To that
end, in the first
quarter of 2008,
the ongoing search
for additional
senior management
resulted in the
hiring of a new
Chief Investment
Officer and new
Product Head for
our asset
management
division. We are
excited about the
opportunities that
exist in the
marketplace and the
national
recognition and
skill set that recent executive hires are bringing to the table. We intend
to build a
comprehensive array
of products to fill
out a diversified
aggregate
portfolio. Our
steadfast
commitment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
to invest in and grow the asset management
business coupled with the rich heritage of the Wayne
Hummer franchise should enable us to develop new
winning investment strategies for our private clients
and institutional investors.
WestAmerica Mortgage Company
In 2007, WestAmerica focused on improving
operating efficiencies, boosting service standards and
managing every production branch to contribute to
overall profitability. This focus was necessary with the
mortgage industry in a state
of disarray as a result of the widespread issues
surrounding sub-prime mortgages. Additionally,
warehouse interest spreads were virtually non-existent
with the inverted yield curve and, as noted earlier in
this report, we had losses associated with certain
recourse obligations due primarily to early payment
defaults on loans that had been sold into the secondary
market.
However, we remain cautiously optimistic that 2008 will
bode well for our mortgage operation. The yield curve
has improved somewhat in early 2008, which should
provide additional margins on loans that we warehouse,
pending sale to the secondary market. Also, the
overall rate environment has lowered which, if rates
stay low, should provide for increased refinancing
volumes. Further, recent increases in conventional and government loan limits should help WestAmericas business.
We will also continue our ongoing effort to gain
further presence in more of our banking facilities. To that end,
WestAmerica will boost its presence with lobby signage,
point-of-sale displays, and participation in every
possible cross-sell opportunity. This should
build awareness to over 125,000 Wintrust bank
households at a relatively low cost.
The people at our Wintrust Community Bank raised the comfort level with what we had to do. This
was a major project. Everyone made us feel comfortable, from the top down. The bank worked with us
and educated us every step of the way. They were knowledgeable, walked us through the process and
even did the leg work for us. At the time, no other bank could step up to the plate and deliver.
Our bank knew our mission and was very supportive. I would highly recommend it to anyone to pursue
a Wintrust Bank for a commercial project like ours. Their communication is excellent, they have
superior knowledge of the process, and demonstrate a willingness and passion for getting the job
done.
Robert M. Martens, Chief Executive Officer, Family Service & Community Mental Health Center for McHenry County
FIRST Insurance Funding Corp.
The premium finance
industry in 2007 faced a second tough year as the volatile interest rate environment and soft
insurance market saw premiums drop up to 20% in some
markets, reducing loan volume and interest margins. However,
unlike many of its competitors who saw a decline in origination
volumes due to the soft insurance market, FIRST increased its
loan production level slightly to $3.1 billion while it increased
its number of loans by almost 10%. The increase in the number
of accounts is reflective of the solid reputation that FIRST has
in the premium finance arena and the hard work put forth
by the team at FIRST. It is important to understand that
the expanded customer base positions us well for substantial
increases in volumes when the insurance market swings back to
higher premium levels.
Like the Wintrust banks, FIRST is also positioning itself as
the provider of complete financial solutions. One new product
line established by FIRST in 2007 was the financing for life
insurance polices tied to high-net-worth estate planning needs.
Additionally, working with our subsidiary bank, Lake Forest
Bank, FIRST can provide its independent insurance agency
customers with loans for agency perpetuation, acquisitions,
equipment, real estate and working capital. Coupled with
FIRSTs core premium finance business, its leading edge
technology and Lake Forest Banks deposit products, FIRSTs
customers have access to a full suite of financial tools to help
make them more successful in a very competitive market.
The November addition of Broadway Premium Funding
Corporation, one of the leaders in premium financing for the
small-to middle-market that will continue to run as a separate
brand, gives Wintrust access to a segment of smaller and midsized
insurance agents not previously covered by FIRST.
As one of the largest premium finance organizations in the
country, FIRST and Broadway continue to prove their industry
leadership with cutting edge technology and unique products
and services.
The products and services Ive received from my Wintrust Community Bank really measure up. It is
clear that the bank is committed to
working with businesses and serving their needs. I get the products available at a large, downtown
bank and the personalized service of a
small, hometown bank. Im not just a number here Ive become a bigger fish in a smaller pond.
Mark E. Echales, Executive Vice-President & GM, American Building Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Tricom Inc. of Milwaukee
The general temporary staffing industry once again
saw temperate growth in 2007. This is causing
intensified pricing competition among providers of
temporary staffing industry financing and back office
solutions. Nonetheless, Tricom maintained a net
revenue contribution to the Company of approximately $8
million in 2007, and a net income contribution of $1.4
million. Acceptable results considering the significant
compression of spreads in the industry.
The strategy of aggressive marketing is working.
Juxtaposing Tricoms strengths against the identified
weaknesses of our primary competition is a method being
used to generate awareness of the benefits of working with Tricom. In Tricoms business, the key driver to growth is
demonstrating our service levels and capabilities
coupled with fair pricing.
We think we provide better and more services per dollar
of cost than our competitors. As we unbundled the
price of combined services and fully disclose our
pricing structure, potential customers consistently
realize that Tricom really does offer excellent value.
We fully intend to build the customer base of this
franchise in 2008.
i-Business Banking, superior customer service and the
experienced professionals at my community bank define
whats best to me. I expect a high level commitment
from my business
partners and thats what Im now getting from my bank.
You can bet the house on it!
Patrick A. Finn, Custom Homes and Remodeling
When we partnered with a Wintrust Community Bank, we
knew that our decision was as important as choosing the
quality products that go into every project we build.
We switched from our old bank to a Wintrust Community
Bank because they made banking the way it used to be
we get personal service.
Mike & Bob Brenner, Micro
Builders
Growth and Earnings Strategies
It is Time For Everyone to Have It All
Almost since our inception, weve had the same mantra
Same or better products as the big banks. Same or
better technology as the big banks. Win customers with
exceptional service. Our product offering and
technology have always put us on the same playing field
as the big-and mega-national banks. What has always
differentiated us is service.
Service First
We make fulfilling clients needs our top
priority, whether in banking, mortgages, wealth
management or any of our other businesses. This
results in more satisfied customers and higher customer
loyalty.
Over the years, weve always measured our
customers level of satisfaction and have been proud of
our results. In 2007, we went one step further and
began a Mystery Shopping program with our banks. While
we confirmed what we always knew, that our banks
performed better than our peers, we also learned that
there is always room for improvement. This valuable tool
now presents us with new opportunities to train our
employees and improve our already high level of
customer service.
To ensure customer service improvements at our banking
facilities, each charter is appointing an Ambassador of
Customer Experience, who will make it his or her job to
ensure each banking facility is as warm, inviting,
attractive, and functional from a customers
perspective as it possibly can be. In other words, we
continue to look for all possible ways to not become
complacent with our level of service but rather find
ways to always improve upon the most important
differentiating aspect of our business.
Proven Recipe for a Strong Franchise
In 2007, we started reminding everyone, customers and
non-customers that with Wintrust banks they could in
fact Have It All Big Bank Resources and Community
Bank Service. This belief has always been at the core
of what we do and allowed us to develop a long-term
recipe for success:
|
1. |
|
Start with a strong base of community banks; |
|
|
2. |
|
Add a growing commercial banking business; |
|
|
3. |
|
Fold in expanding wealth management services; and |
|
|
4. |
|
Top off with asset niches and
other income generators. |
1. Start with a Strong Base of Community Banks
Wintrusts 15 bank charters and 77 locations are the
backbone of our organization. It is here that we
strengthen our relationships, serve our communities and
build our business. Nine banks and 56 facilities were
de novo launches. The remaining banks and locations have
been added via acquisition since 2003. We will
continue to add additional branches via de novo
launches and perhaps acquisition if the right
opportunity presents itself.
Deposit Market Share-Chicago MSA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2007 |
|
At June 30, 2006 |
|
|
In-market |
|
Deposit |
|
In-market |
|
Deposit |
|
|
Deposit |
|
Market |
|
Deposit |
|
Market |
Bank Holding Company |
|
Dollars |
|
Share |
|
Dollars |
|
Share |
|
1) JP Morgan Chase & Co. * |
|
$38.9 BB |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
$40.1 BB |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
2) ABN AMRO Holding N.V. * |
|
$34.6 BB |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
$37.0 BB |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
3) Bank of Montreal * |
|
$29.7 BB |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
$25.6 BB |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
4) Northern Trust Corporation |
|
$8.9 BB |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$7.3 BB |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
5) Fifth Third Bancorp * |
|
$8.4 BB |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$8.5 BB |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
6) Corus Bankshares |
|
$8.4 BB |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$8.2 BB |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
7) Royal Bank of Scotland Group * |
|
$7.8 BB |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$7.3 BB |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
8) Citigroup, Inc. * |
|
$7.6 BB |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$7.3 BB |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
9) Wintrust Financial Corporation |
|
$7.2 BB |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
$7.2 BB |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
Source: FDIC website Summary of Deposits as of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006. Market share
data is for the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area.
* - Corporate Headquarters is out-of-state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Since our inception in 1991, weve used a proven mix of
operating and marketing strategies that allow us to
position ourselves differently from the centralized big
banks and to better deliver our community bank
products and services. Our unique growth strategies include:
Decentralized Management. The management teams at
each of our 15 banks ultimately control the fate of
their banks. Each has profit responsibilities and the
authority to make decisions locally. Our local
decision making structure results in more flexibility
and customized products to better meet local needs. It
also allows better pricing, quicker decisions, more
community involvement and customer service more in tune
with local customers and businesses. This autonomy lets
us attract and retain the best and most entrepreneurial
bankers in the area who embrace the responsibility,
accountability and the glory.
Local Board and Local Bankers. Each bank is governed
by a local board of directors made up of business and
community leaders who are influential in the banks
market. These boards not only bring local oversight,
they also supply local contacts and their involvement
is required to make our banks real community banks.
We staff our banks with local bankers who are
deeply involved and well known in their communities.
Their local roots are what make each Wintrust bank a good
hometown bank. Though the Shop Locally fads often
come and go, we know that most people prefer to bank
with the professionals and institutions they know.
Ultimately, everyone wants to work with local bankers
that know them and can better meet their needs.
Local Branding. We not only run our banks locally, we
also brand many of our banks and branches after the
local communities. The Advantage Bank group is a good
example, with its branches also positioned locally as
Old Town Bank & Trust of Bloomingdale, Elk Grove Village Bank & Trust
and Roselle Bank & Trust.
Aggressive and Creative Marketing. When Wintrust
enters a new market, we have a variety of very
aggressive introductory marketing programs. These are
designed to quickly acquire new customers, expand
our customer base and allow us to grow into our
overhead and reach profitability quickly.
After our introductory period, our banks continue to be
aggressive with marketing to grow household penetration
and accounts per household. We do this with targeted
direct mail and consistent campaigns that build our
distinct community bank positioning. Sometimes, this
may take the form of ads that poke fun at the big
banks, positioning them as profits-over-service
institutions. Other times, its simply a matter of
defining what community banking is and proving that
Wintrust banks live up to that definition.
2. Add a Growing Commercial Banking Business
Mid-2007 saw a new
marketing initiative
from Wintrust. For the
first time in our history,
we started promoting
the Wintrust brand to
commercial customers. Our fish campaign began to promote
Wintrusts complete suite of commercial banking products and
superior customer service.
In 2008, well continue this with our Have It All campaign.
Focusing on customer testimonials, this series of ads and direct
mail highlights the complete financial solutions weve provided
to Wintrust commercial customers, while promoting our key
differentiator service and strong relationships.
As in years past, our key target is middle market commercial and
industrial businesses and our primary competition is the larger
banks. We have sophisticated treasury management capabilities
and technology that are every bit as good as the big banks and
the professionals who know how to sell and implement these
programs.
The opportunities available to Wintrust in 2008, especially in
commercial banking, are almost incalculable. The acquisitions
of some competitors and the credit foibles of others have opened
up a window that the Wintrust banks can perfectly fit through.
3. Fold in Expanding Wealth Management Services
The wealth management services provided by our three
Wayne Hummer companies (Investment, Trust and Asset
Management) allow us to be complete financial providers to
all Wintrust customers.
We still have an amazing opportunity to grow our investment
and trust groups within our community banks. Our Banks
are in most of the desirable markets of northeastern Illinois
and southern Wisconsin. We will continue to convince our
bank customers that we can serve their wealth management
needs better than the big-box type, national firms.
Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company is also primed
to see real growth in 2008. The appointment of Daniel J.
Cardell, CFA, as President and Chief Investment Officer
and Todd D. Doersch as Head of Product Management,
will enable us to develop new investment strategies for our
private clients and institutional investors and be a key step in
realizing our vision of becoming the areas premier money
manager.
As in previous years, we will continue increasing the number
of Wayne Hummer Wealth Management personnel at our
Banks. We are concentrating on opportunities for new wealth
management experts that live within our communities, giving
them the opportunity, like our bankers, to work in the same
communities in which they live.
4. Top Off with Asset Niches and Other Income Generators
One of the things that allows our community banks to be
flexible in meeting the needs of customers and not chasing the
latest banking fads is Wintrusts commitment to asset niches
and other income generators.
Many community and regional banks have difficulty generating
loans from the local consumers and small businesses that
exceed 60% of their lending capacity without
compromising credit quality. Some overcome this by making
questionable loans or following the nationals into questionable
sectors.
I switched from my old bank to a Wintrust Community Bank because I get personal service from them.
They know who I am, and they help me take care of my business.
Vicki Baker, Gifts of Distinction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Wintrust overcomes this limitation by augmenting
our community banks loan portfolios with
non-traditional earning assets. This improves the
profitability of our community banks, gives us
additional income to continue to invest in growth,
diversifies our loan portfolios and allows the banks
to maintain their credit standards. Asset niches allow
us to grow the right way, so we never feel compelled to
pursue bad credits for the sake of growth.
Wintrust banks and their subsidiaries operate a number
of companies that specialize in non-traditional bank
lending functions. Non-bank asset niches account for
16.3% of total loans while specialty banking asset
niches account for 5.6%.
% of Total Loans
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Bank Asset Niches |
|
|
|
|
Premium finance
lending (FIRST and Broadway) |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Temporary staffing industry
financing (Tricom) |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Banking Asset Niches |
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer (primarily auto lending at Hinsdale Bank) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Mortgage warehouse lending
(Hinsdale Bank) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Condominium and association lending
(Community Advantage-
Barrington Bank) |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Small craft aviation lending
(NorthAmerican Aviation
Finance-Crystal Lake Bank) |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
We also continue to develop fee based services and internal specialties that help Wintrust
diversify revenue. This includes not only our wealth management (Wayne Hummer) and residential
mortgage (WestAmerica) companies, but also a number of other specialties like commercial mortgage
brokerage and municipal services.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions remain an important and viable source
of growth for many companies. Since 1999, Wintrust has
added a number of banking and other complementary
businesses via acquisition. These acquisitions are an
important tactic for Wintrust to add key strategic and
niche assets, as well as expand into banking locations
and markets, creating value for our shareholders.
Banking Acquisitions. Over the past several years,
weve been contacted by many Midwestern community banks
with the goal of merging their community-based bank and
branches into the Wintrust family. This year has not
been any different. While we entertained several
proposals, there were no opportunities that brought the
necessary value to Wintrust.
It is our goal to continue to add new banks in
attractive markets, either on a de novo basis or by
acquisition, always taking into account business sense
and shareholder value.
Our bank acquisitions have proved successful in the
past and have grown deposits, assets, and market share.
Other Acquisitions. We also
continue to evaluate non-banking
opportunities. These include wealth
management and asset or fee
income generators. Adding these
types of companies will diversify our earning assets and
fee-based income businesses to supplement
and diversify Wintrusts revenue
stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Beginning of Financial Review Section
Now that you have read some of the highlights for the
Company in the year 2007, take a closer look at the full
story of our financial performance in the remaining pages
of our Annual Report.
Contents of Financial Review Section
|
|
|
Page 24 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis |
Page 58 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
Page 62 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Page 95 |
|
Reports of Internal Control |
Page 97 |
|
Report of Independent Auditors |
Page 98 |
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K |
Page 124 |
|
Exhibits |
Page 127 |
|
Signatures |
Page 128 |
|
Corporate Locations |
Page 132 |
|
Corporate Information |
Managements Discussion and Analysis
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information in this document can be
identified through the use of words such as may, will, intend, plan, project, expect,
anticipate, should, would, believe, estimate, contemplate, possible, and point.
Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors,
and represent only managements expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events.
Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict, which may include, but are not limited to, those
listed below and the risk factors discussed in Item 1A on page 115 of this Report. The Company
intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and
is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such
forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the
Companys projected growth, anticipated improvements in earnings, earnings per share and other
financial performance measures, and managements long-term performance goals, as well as statements
relating to the anticipated effects on financial results of condition from expected developments or
events, the Companys business and growth strategies, including anticipated internal growth, plans
to form additional de novo banks and to open new branch offices, and to pursue additional potential
development or acquisitions of banks, wealth management entities or specialty finance businesses.
Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a
result of numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
Competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the
pricing of the Companys loan and deposit products as well as its services (including
wealth management services). |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the interest rate environment, which may influence, among other things,
the growth of loans and deposits, the quality of the Companys loan portfolio, the
pricing of loans and deposits and interest income. |
|
|
|
|
The extent of defaults and losses on our loan portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Companys
strategy of de novo bank formations and openings. De novo banks typically require 13 to
24 months of operations before becoming profitable, due to the impact of organizational
and overhead expenses, the startup phase of generating deposits and the time lag
typically involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other
higher yielding earning assets. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to obtain liquidity and income from the sale of premium
finance receivables in the future and the unique collection and delinquency risks
associated with such loans. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to identify and complete acquisitions in the future or unexpected
difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the integration of acquired
entities with the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation involving
the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
The loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to
complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in
the banking and financial services industries. |
Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these
forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward
looking statement made by or on behalf of Wintrust. Any such statement speaks only as of the date
the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. Wintrust
does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. Persons are advised, however, to consult any
further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in its press releases.
The Company undertakes no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements or
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion highlights the significant factors affecting the operations and financial
condition of Wintrust for the three years ended December 31, 2007. This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto, and Selected Financial Highlights appearing elsewhere within this report.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
OPERATING SUMMARY
Wintrusts key measures of profitability and balance sheet changes are shown in the following table
(dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% or |
|
% or |
|
|
Years Ended |
|
basis point |
|
basis point |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(bp)change |
|
(bp)change |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 to 2007 |
|
2005 to 2006 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
$ |
66,493 |
|
|
$ |
67,016 |
|
|
|
(16)% |
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
|
(13)% |
|
|
|
(7)% |
|
Net revenue (1) |
|
$ |
341,638 |
|
|
$ |
340,118 |
|
|
$ |
310,316 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
10% |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
261,550 |
|
|
$ |
248,886 |
|
|
$ |
216,759 |
|
|
|
5 % |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
1 bp |
|
(6)bp |
Core net interest margin(2)(5) |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
6 bp |
|
(5)bp |
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
18 bp |
|
15 bp |
Efficiency ratio(4)(5) |
|
|
71.06 |
% |
|
|
66.96 |
% |
|
|
63.97 |
% |
|
410 bp |
|
299 bp |
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
(15)bp |
|
(14)bp |
Return on average equity |
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
9.47 |
% |
|
|
11.00 |
% |
|
(183)bp |
|
(153)bp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,368,859 |
|
|
$ |
9,571,852 |
|
|
$ |
8,177,042 |
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
17% |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
6,801,602 |
|
|
$ |
6,496,480 |
|
|
$ |
5,213,871 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
7,471,441 |
|
|
$ |
7,869,240 |
|
|
$ |
6,729,434 |
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
17% |
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
739,555 |
|
|
$ |
773,346 |
|
|
$ |
627,911 |
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
23% |
|
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
31.56 |
|
|
$ |
30.38 |
|
|
$ |
26.23 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
16% |
|
Market price per common share |
|
$ |
33.13 |
|
|
$ |
48.02 |
|
|
$ |
54.90 |
|
|
|
(31)% |
|
|
|
(13)% |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,430,490 |
|
|
|
25,457,935 |
|
|
|
23,940,744 |
|
|
|
(8)% |
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income. |
|
(2) |
|
Core net interest margin excludes the effect of the net interest expense associated with
Wintrusts junior subordinated debentures and the interest expense incurred to fund common
stock repurchases. |
|
(3) |
|
The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total
non-interest income and dividing by that periods total average assets. A lower ratio
indicates a higher degree of efficiency. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent
net revenue (excluding securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient
revenue generation. |
|
(5) |
|
See Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
Please refer to the Consolidated Results of Operations section later in this discussion for an
analysis of the Companys operations for the past three years.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry.
However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and
measure the Companys performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including
its individual components), net interest margin (including its individual components), core net
interest margin and the efficiency ratio. Management believes that these measures and ratios
provide users of the Companys financial information with a more meaningful view of the performance
of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Companys operating
efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios
differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company
and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. In this non-GAAP
presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an
equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures the comparability of net interest income arising
from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the
calculation of the Companys efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by
dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or
losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses
are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational
expenses.
Management also evaluates the net interest margin excluding the interest expense associated with
the Companys junior subordinated debentures and the interest expense incurred to fund common stock
repurchases (Core Net Interest Margin). Because junior subordinated debentures are utilized by
the Company primarily as capital instruments and the cost incurred to fund common stock repurchases
is capital utilization related, management finds it useful to view the net interest margin
excluding these expenses and deems it to be a more meaningful view of the operational net interest
margin of the Company.
The following table presents a reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios
used by the Company to evaluate and measure the Companys performance to the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measures for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(A) Interest income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
611,557 |
|
|
$ |
557,945 |
|
|
$ |
407,036 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Loans |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
- Liquidity management assets |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
- Other earning assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income FTE |
|
$ |
614,784 |
|
|
$ |
559,566 |
|
|
$ |
408,363 |
|
(B) Interest expense (GAAP) |
|
|
350,007 |
|
|
|
309,059 |
|
|
|
190,277 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
264,777 |
|
|
$ |
250,507 |
|
|
$ |
218,086 |
|
|
|
|
(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B) |
|
$ |
261,550 |
|
|
$ |
248,886 |
|
|
$ |
216,759 |
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
264,777 |
|
|
$ |
250,507 |
|
|
$ |
218,086 |
|
Add: Interest expense on junior
subordinated debentures and interest cost incurred for common stock
repurchases(1) |
|
|
23,170 |
|
|
|
17,838 |
|
|
|
14,672 |
|
|
|
|
Core net interest income FTE(2) |
|
$ |
287,947 |
|
|
$ |
268,345 |
|
|
$ |
232,758 |
|
|
|
|
(D) Net interest margin (GAAP) |
|
|
3.07% |
|
|
|
3.07% |
|
|
|
3.14% |
|
Net interest margin FTE |
|
|
3.11% |
|
|
|
3.10% |
|
|
|
3.16% |
|
Core net interest margin FTE(2) |
|
|
3.38% |
|
|
|
3.32% |
|
|
|
3.37% |
|
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP) |
|
|
71.74% |
|
|
|
67.28% |
|
|
|
64.25% |
|
Efficiency ratio FTE |
|
|
71.06% |
|
|
|
66.96% |
|
|
|
63.97% |
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense from the junior subordinated debentures is net of the interest income on
the Common Securities owned by the Trusts and included in
interest income. Interest cost incurred for common stock repurchases is estimated using
current period average rates on certain debt obligations. |
|
(2) |
|
Core net interest income and core net interest margin are by definition a non-GAAP
measure/ratio. The GAAP equivalents are the net interest income and net interest margin
determined in accordance with GAAP (lines C and D in the table). |
OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY
Wintrust is a financial holding company, providing traditional community banking services as well
as a full array of wealth management services. The Company has grown rapidly since its inception
and its Banks have been among the fastest growing community-oriented de novo banking operations in
Illinois and the country. As of December 31, 2007, the Company operated 15 community-oriented bank
subsidiaries (the Banks) with 77 banking locations. During 2007, the Company acquired a premium
finance company and opened five new bank branches. During 2006, the Company acquired one bank with
five locations, opened its ninth de novo bank and opened five new branches. However, the Company
temporarily curtailed balance sheet growth trends in 2007 given the interest rate and credit
environments. Additionally, the historical financial performance of the Company has been affected
by costs associated with growing market share in deposits and loans, establishing new banks and
opening new branch facilities, and building an experienced management team. The Companys
experience has been that it generally takes 13-24 months for new banking offices to first achieve
operational profitability.
Managements ongoing focus is to balance further asset growth with earnings growth by seeking to
fully leverage the existing capacity within each of the Banks and non-bank subsidiaries. One
aspect of this strategy is to continue to pursue specialized lending or earning asset niches in
order to maintain the mix of earning assets in higher-yielding loans as well as diversify the loan
portfolio. Another aspect of this strategy is a continued focus on less aggressive deposit pricing
at the Banks with significant market share and more established customer bases.
Wintrust also provides a full range of wealth management
services through its trust, asset management and broker-dealer subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
De Novo Bank Formations, Branch Openings and Acquisitions
The Company developed its community banking franchise through the formation of nine de novo banks,
the opening of branch offices of the Banks and acquisitions. Following is a summary of the
expansion of the Companys banking franchise through newly chartered banks, new branching locations
and acquisitions over the last three years.
2007 Banking Expansion Activity
Opened the following branch locations
|
|
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, a branch of Barrington Bank |
|
|
|
Hartland, Wisconsin, a branch of Town Bank |
|
|
|
Bloomingdale, Illinois, a branch of Advantage Bank |
|
|
|
Island Lake, Illinois, a branch of Libertyville Bank |
|
|
|
North Chicago, Illinois, a branch of Lake Forest Bank |
Closed the following branch location
|
|
Glen Ellyn Bank, temporary facility opened in 2005, a
branch of Wheaton Bank |
2006 Banking Expansion Activity
Opened the Companys ninth de novo bank
|
|
Old Plank Trail Bank in Frankfort, Illinois |
Opened the following branch locations
|
|
St. Charles, Illinois, a branch of St. Charles Bank |
|
|
|
Algonquin Bank & Trust, a branch of Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
|
Mokena, Illinois, a branch of Old Plank Trail Bank |
|
|
|
Elm Grove, Wisconsin, a branch of Town Bank |
|
|
|
New Lenox, Illinois, a branch of Old Plank Trail Bank |
Acquired the following banks
|
|
Hinsbrook Bank with locations in Willowbrook,
Downers Grove, Glen Ellyn, Darien and Geneva |
2005 Banking Expansion Activity
Opened the following branch locations
|
|
Wales, Wisconsin, a branch of Town Bank |
|
|
|
Glen Ellyn Bank, a branch of Wheaton Bank |
|
|
|
West Northbrook, a branch of Northbrook Bank |
|
|
|
Lake Bluff drive through facility added to existing
banking office; a branch of Lake Forest Bank |
|
|
|
Northwest Highway in Barrington, a branch of
Barrington Bank |
|
|
|
Palatine Bank & Trust, a branch of Barrington Bank
Acquired the following banks |
|
|
|
State Bank of The Lakes with locations in Antioch, Lindenhurst, Grayslake, Spring Grove and
McHenry |
|
|
|
First Northwest Bank with two locations in Arlington Heights |
Closed the following branch location
|
|
Wayne Hummer Bank, a branch of North Shore Bank |
Earning Asset, Wealth Management
and Other Business Niches
As previously mentioned, the Company continues to pursue specialized earning asset and business
niches in order to maximize the Companys revenue stream as well as diversify its loan portfolio.
A summary of the Companys more significant earning asset niches and non-bank operating
subsidiaries follows.
Wayne Hummer Investments LLC (WHI), a registered broker-dealer, provides a full-range of
investment products and services tailored to meet the specific needs of individual and
institutional investors throughout the country, primarily in the Midwest. In addition, WHI
provides a full range of investment services to clients through a network of relationships with
community-based financial institutions located primarily in Illinois. Although headquartered in
Chicago, WHI also operates an office in Appleton, Wisconsin that opened in 1936 and serves the
greater Appleton area. As of December 31, 2007, WHI had branch locations in offices in a majority
of the Companys fifteen banks. WHI had approximately $5.6 billion in client assets at December
31, 2007.
Wayne Hummer Asset Management (WHAMC), a registered investment advisor, is the investment
advisory affiliate of WHI. WHAMC provides money management, financial planning and investment
advisory services to individuals and institutional, municipal and tax-exempt organizations. WHAMC
also provides portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide-range of pension and profit
sharing plans. At December 31, 2007, assets under management totaled approximately $541 million.
Wayne Hummer Trust Company (WHTC) was formed to offer trust and investment management services to
all communities served by the Banks. In addition to offering trust services to existing bank
customers at each of the Banks, the Company believes WHTC can successfully compete for trust
business by targeting small to mid-size businesses and affluent individuals whose needs command the
personalized attention offered by WHTCs experienced trust professionals. Services offered by WHTC
typically include traditional trust products and services, as well as investment management
services. Assets under administration by WHTC as of December 31, 2007 were approximately $1.0
billion.
First Insurance Funding Corp. (FIFC) is the Companys
most significant specialized earning asset niche,
originating approximately $3.1 billion in loan (premium
finance receivables) volume during 2007. FIFC makes
loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums
they pay on their commercial insurance policies. The
loans are originated by FIFC working through
independent medium and large insurance agents and
brokers located throughout the United States. The
insurance premiums financed are primarily for
commercial customers purchases of liability, property
and casualty and other commercial insurance. This
lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan
portfolio and high volume of loan originations.
Because of the indirect nature of this lending and
because the borrowers are located nationwide, this
segment may be more susceptible to third party fraud,
however no material third party fraud has occurred
since the third quarter of 2000. The majority of these
loans are purchased by the Banks in order to more fully
utilize their lending capacity, and these loans
generally provide the Banks with higher yields than
alternative investments. However, excess FIFC
originations over the capacity to retain such loans
within the Banks loan portfolios may be sold to an
unrelated third party with servicing retained.
Additionally, in 2007, FIFC began to make loans to
irrevocable life insurance trusts to purchase life
insurance policies for high net-worth individuals. The
loans are originated through independent insurance
agents or financial advisors and legal counsel. The
life insurance policy is the primary collateral on the
loan and, in most cases, the loans are also secured by a letter of credit.
On
November 1, 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium
Funding Corporation (Broadway). Broadway is a
commercial finance company that specializes in
financing insurance premiums for corporate entities.
Its products are marketed through insurance agents and
brokers to their small to mid-size corporate clients.
Broadway is headquartered in New York City and services
clients primarily in the northeastern United States and
California. Broadway is a subsidiary of FIFC.
SGB Corporation d/b/a WestAmerica Mortgage Company
(WestAmerica) engages primarily in the origination
and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the
secondary market. WestAmericas affiliate Guardian Real
Estate Services, Inc. (Guardian) provides the
document preparation and other loan closing services to
West America and its network of mortgage brokers. West
America sells its loans with servicing released and
does not currently engage in servicing loans for
others. WestAmerica maintains principal origination
offices in nine states, including Illinois, and
originates loans in other states through wholesale and
correspondent offices. WestAmerica
provides the Banks with the ability to use an enhanced
loan origination and documentation system which allows
WestAmerica and each Bank to better utilize existing
operational capacity and expand the
mortgage products offered to the Banks customers.
WestAmericas production of adjustable rate mortgage
loans may be retained by the Banks in their loan
portfolios, resulting in additional earning assets to
the combined organization, thus adding further desired
diversification to the Companys earning asset base.
Tricom, Inc (Tricom) is a company that has been in
business since 1989 and specializes in providing
high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing
and value-added out-sourced administrative services,
such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash
management services to clients in the temporary
staffing industry. Tricoms clients, located throughout
the United States, provide staffing services to
businesses in diversified industries. These receivables
may involve greater credit risks than generally
associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional
community banks depending on the marketability of the
collateral. The principal sources of repayments on the
receivables are payments received by the borrowers from
their customers who are located throughout the United
States. Tricom mitigates this risk by employing
lockboxes and other cash management techniques to
protect its interests. Tricoms revenue principally
consists of interest income from financing activities
and fee-based revenues from administrative services.
Tricom processed payrolls with associated client
billings of approximately $467 million in 2007 and $531
million in 2006.
In addition to the earning asset niches provided by the
Companys non-bank subsidiaries, several earning asset
niches operate within the Banks, including indirect
auto lending which is conducted through Hinsdale Bank,
and Barrington Banks Community Advantage program that
provides lending, deposit and cash management services
to condominium, homeowner and community associations.
In addition, Hinsdale Bank operates a mortgage
warehouse lending program that provides loan and
deposit services to mortgage brokerage companies
located predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area,
and Crystal Lake Bank has a specialty in small aircraft
lending. The Company continues to pursue the
development or acquisition of other specialty lending
businesses that generate assets suitable for bank
investment and/or secondary market sales.
SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are
prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States and
prevailing practices of
the banking industry. Application of these principles
requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and
judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These
estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on
information available as of the date of the financial
statements; accordingly, as this information changes,
the financial statements could reflect different
estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain
policies and accounting principles inher-
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
ently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be
materially different than originally reported.
Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when
assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at
fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not
carried on the financial statements at fair value
warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve
to be established, or when an asset or liability needs
to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying
assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results
in more financial statement volatility. The fair
values and the information used to record valuation
adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are
based either on quoted market prices or are provided by
other third-party sources, when available. When third
party information is not available, valuation
adjustments are estimated in good faith by management
primarily through the use of internal cash flow
modeling techniques.
A summary of the Companys significant accounting
policies is presented in Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. These policies, along with the
disclosures presented in the other financial statement
notes and in this Managements Discussion and Analysis
section, provide information on how significant assets
and liabilities are valued in the financial statements
and how those values are determined. Management views
critical accounting policies to be those which are
highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments,
estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those
estimates and assumptions could have a significant
impact on the financial statements. Management
currently views the determination of the allowance for
loan losses and the allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments, the valuation of the
retained interest in the premium finance receivables
sold, the valuations required for impairment testing of
goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative
instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas
that require the most subjective and complex judgments,
and as such could be the most subject to revision as
new information becomes available.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for
Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
The allowance for loan losses represents managements
estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for
loan losses is considered a critical accounting
estimate because it requires significant judgment and
the use of estimates related to the amount and timing
of expected future cash flows on impaired loans,
estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of
current economic trends and conditions, all of which
are susceptible to significant change. The loan
portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the
consolidated balance sheet. The Company also maintains
an allowance for lending-related commitments,
specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit, which relates
to certain amounts the Company is committed to lend but
for which funds have not yet been disbursed.
Management has established credit committees at each of
the Banks that evaluate the credit quality of the loan
portfolio and the level of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses and the allowance for
lending-related commitments. See Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the section
titled Credit Risk and Asset Quality later in this
report for a description of the methodology used to
determine the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for lending-related commitments.
Sales of Premium Finance Receivables
The gains on the sale of premium finance receivables
are determined based on managements estimates of the
underlying future cash flows of the loans sold. Cash
flow projections are used to allocate the Companys
initial investment in a loan between the loan, the
servicing asset and the Companys retained interest,
including its guarantee obligation, based on their
relative fair values. Gains or losses are recognized
for the difference between the proceeds received and
the cost basis allocated to the loan. The Companys
retained interest includes a servicing asset, an
interest only strip and a guarantee obligation pursuant
to the terms of the sale agreement. The estimates of
future cash flows from the underlying loans incorporate
assumptions for prepayments, late payments and other
factors. The Companys guarantee obligation is
estimated based on the historical loss experience and
credit risk factors of the loans. If actual cash flows
from the underlying loans are less than originally
anticipated, the Companys retained interest may be
impaired, and such impairment would be recorded as a
charge to earnings. Because the terms of the loans sold
are less than ten months, the estimation of the cash
flows is inherently easier to monitor than if the
assets had longer durations, such as mortgage loans.
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and
the section titled Non-interest Income later in this
report for further analysis of the gains on sale of
premium finance receivables.
Impairment Testing of Goodwill
As required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, the Company performs impairment testing of
goodwill on an annual basis or more frequently when
events warrant. Valuations are estimated in good faith
by management primarily through the use of publicly
available valuations of comparable entities for the
Companys bank
subsidiaries and internal cash flow models using
financial projections in the reporting units business
plan, if public valuations are not available for the
Companys non-bank entities.
Valuation and Accounting for Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage
risks such as interest rate risk or market risk. The
Companys policy prohibits using derivatives for
speculative purposes.
Accounting for derivatives differs significantly
depending on whether a derivative is designated as a
hedge, which is a transaction intended to reduce a risk
associated with a specific asset or liability or future
expected cash flow at the time it is purchased. In
order to qualify as a hedge, a derivative must be
designated as such by management. Management must also
continue to evaluate whether the instrument effectively
reduces the risk associated with that item. To
determine if a derivative instrument continues to be an
effective hedge, the Company must make assumptions and
judgments about the continued effectiveness of the
hedging strategies and the nature and timing of
forecasted transactions. If the Companys hedging
strategy were to become ineffective, hedge accounting
would no longer apply and the reported results of
operations or financial condition could be materially
affected.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to the income tax laws of the
U.S., its states and other jurisdictions where it
conducts business. These laws are complex and subject
to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the
various taxing authorities. In determining the
provision for income taxes, management must make
judgments and estimates about the application of these
inherently complex laws, related regulations and case
law. In the process of preparing the Companys tax
returns, management attempts to make reasonable
interpretations of the tax laws. These interpretations
are subject to challenge by the tax authorities upon
audit or to reinterpretation based on managements
ongoing assessment of facts and evolving case law.
On a quarterly basis, management assesses the
reasonableness of its effective tax rate based upon its
current best estimate of net income and the applicable
taxes expected for the full year. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are reassessed on a quarterly basis, if
business events or circumstances warrant.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) which clarifies the
accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum
recognition threshold a tax position is required to
meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
dere-cognition, measurement, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did
not have a material impact on the Company.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of Wintrusts results of
operations requires an understanding that a majority of
the Companys bank subsidiaries have been started as
new banks since December 1991. Wintrust is still a
relatively young company that has a strategy of
continuing to build its customer base and securing
broad product penetration in each marketplace that it
serves. The Company has expanded its banking franchise
from three banks with five offices in 1994 to 15 Banks
with 77 offices at the end of 2007. FIFC has matured
from its limited operations in 1991 to a company that
generated, on a national basis, $3.1 billion in premium
finance receivables in 2007. In addition, the wealth
management companies have been building a team of
experienced professionals who are located within a
majority of the Banks. These expansion activities have
understandably suppressed faster, opportunistic
earnings. However, as the Company matures and our
existing Banks become more profitable, the start-up
costs associated with future bank and branch openings
and other new financial services ventures will not have
as significant an impact on earnings. Additionally,
the Companys more mature Banks have several operating
ratios that are either comparable to or better than
peer group data, suggesting that as the Banks become
more established, the overall earnings level will
continue to increase.
Earnings Summary
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007,
totaled $55.7 million, or $2.24 per diluted common
share, compared to $66.5 million, or $2.56 per diluted
common share, in 2006, and $67.0 million, or $2.75 per
diluted common share, in 2005. During 2007, net income
declined by 16% while earnings per diluted common share
declined by 13%, and during 2006, net income remained
essentially the same, decreasing 1%, while earnings per
diluted common share decreased 7%. Financial results
in 2007 were negatively impacted by a continued
compression of interest rate spreads, an increase in
provision for credit losses, lower levels of mortgage
banking revenue and a reduced level of trading income.
Financial results in 2006 were negatively impacted by
the adoption of SFAS 123R (stock option expense),
compressed interest spreads, a decrease in fees from
covered call options, lower levels of mortgage banking
revenue and lower sales of premium finance receivables,
and was positively impacted by the fair value
adjustments related to certain derivatives.
Net Interest Income
The primary source of the Companys revenue is net
interest income. Net interest income is the difference
between interest income and fees on earning assets,
such as loans and securities, and interest expense on
the liabilities to fund those assets, including
interest bearing deposits and
other borrowings. The amount of net interest income is
affected by both changes in the level of interest rates
and the amount and composition of earn-
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
ing assets and interest bearing liabilities. In order
to compare the tax-exempt asset yields to taxable
yields, interest income in the following discussion and
tables is adjusted to tax-equivalent yields based on
the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 35%.
Tax-equivalent net interest income in 2007 totaled
$264.8 million, up from $250.5 million in 2006 and
$218.1 million in 2005, representing increases of $14.3
million, or 6%, in 2007 and $32.4 million, or 15%, in
2006. These improved levels of net interest income
were primarily attributable to increases in average
earning assets. The table presented later in this
section, titled Changes in Interest Income and
Expense, presents the dollar amount of changes in
interest income and expense, by major category,
attributable to changes in the volume of the balance
sheet category and changes in the rate earned or paid
with respect to that category of assets or liabilities
for 2007 and 2006. Average earning assets increased
$426.5 million, or 5%, in 2007 and $1.2 billion, or
17%, in 2006. Loans are the most significant component
of the earning asset base as they earn interest at a
higher rate than the other earning assets. Average
loans increased $811.5 million, or 14%, in 2007 and
$875.4 million, or 17%, in 2006. Total average loans
as a percentage of total average earning assets were
80%, 74% and 75% in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
The average yield on loans was 7.71% in 2007, 7.60% in
2006 and 6.54% in 2005, reflecting an increase of 11
basis points in 2007 and an increase of 106 basis
points in 2006. The higher loan yield in 2007 compared
to 2006 is a result of the higher average rate
environment in the first three quarters of 2007. The
higher loan yield in 2006 compared to 2005 is
reflective of the interest rate increases effected by
the Federal Reserve Bank offset by continued
competitive loan pricing pressures. Similarly, the
average rate paid on interest bearing deposits, the
largest component of the Companys interest bearing
liabilities, was 4.26% in 2007, 3.97% in 2006 and 2.80%
in 2005, representing an increase of 29 basis points in
2007 and an increase of 117 basis points in 2006. The
interest bearing deposits yield increased in 2007 due
to higher costs of retail deposits as rates have
generally risen in 2007, continued competitive pricing
pressures on fixed-maturity time deposits in
most markets and promotional pricing activities
associated with opening additional de novo branches.
Net interest margin, which reflects net interest income
as a per-cent of average earning assets, remained
relatively flat at 3.11% in 2007 compared to 3.10% in
2006. During 2007, the Companys focus on retail
deposit pricing and changing the mix of deposits has
helped offset the competitive pricing of retail
certificates of deposit. The Company has made progress
in shifting its mix of retail deposits away from
certificates of deposit into lower cost, more variable
rate
NOW, money market and wealth management deposits. Net
interest margin in 2005 was 3.16%.
The core net interest margin was 3.38% in 2007, 3.32%
in 2006 and 3.37% in 2005. Management evaluates the
core net interest margin excluding the net interest
expense associated with the Companys junior
subordinated debentures and the interest expense
incurred to fund common stock repurchases. Because
junior subordinated debentures are utilized by the
Company primarily as capital instruments and the cost
incurred to fund common stock repurchases is capital
utilization related, management finds it useful to view
the net interest margin excluding these expenses and
deems them to be a more accurate view of the
operational net interest margin of the Company. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios section of this
report.
Net interest income and net interest margin were also
affected by amortization of valuation adjustments to
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities of
acquired businesses. Under the purchase method of
accounting, assets and liabilities of acquired
businesses are required to be recognized at their
estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. These
valuation adjustments represent the difference between
the estimated fair value and the carrying value of
assets and liabilities acquired. These adjustments are
amortized into interest income and interest expense
based upon the estimated remaining lives of the assets
and liabilities acquired. See Note 7 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion of the Companys business combinations.
Average Balance Sheets, Interest Income and Expense, and Interest Rate Yields and Costs
The following table sets forth the average balances, the interest earned or paid thereon, and the
effective interest rate, yield or cost for each major category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The yields and
costs include loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs that are considered
adjustments to yields. Interest income on non-accruing loans is reflected in the year that it is
collected, to the extent it is not applied to principal. Such amounts are not material to net
interest income or the net change in net interest income in any year. Non-accrual loans are
included in the average balances and do not have a material effect on the average yield. Net
interest income and the related net interest margin have been adjusted to reflect tax-exempt
income, such as interest on municipal securities and loans, on a tax-equivalent basis. This table
should be referred to in conjunction with this analysis and discussion of the financial condition
and results of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Balance(1) |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance(1) |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance(1) |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
14,036 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
$ |
13,361 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
$ |
9,003 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
Securities |
|
|
1,588,542 |
|
|
|
81,790 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
|
1,930,662 |
|
|
|
94,593 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
1,627,523 |
|
|
|
67,333 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
72,141 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
110,775 |
|
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
102,199 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity management assets(2) (8) |
|
|
1,674,719 |
|
|
|
86,405 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
2,054,798 |
|
|
|
100,637 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
1,738,725 |
|
|
|
71,096 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
Other earning assets(2) (3) |
|
|
24,721 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
|
29,675 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income(2) (4) (8) |
|
|
6,824,880 |
|
|
|
526,436 |
|
|
|
7.71 |
|
|
|
6,013,344 |
|
|
|
456,793 |
|
|
|
7.60 |
|
|
|
5,137,912 |
|
|
|
335,922 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets(8) |
|
|
8,524,320 |
|
|
|
614,784 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
8,097,817 |
|
|
|
559,566 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
6,900,281 |
|
|
|
408,363 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(48,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
131,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
835,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,442,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,925,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,587,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits interest bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
938,960 |
|
|
$ |
25,033 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
$ |
774,481 |
|
|
$ |
19,548 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
$ |
699,323 |
|
|
$ |
11,973 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
547,408 |
|
|
|
24,871 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
464,438 |
|
|
|
20,456 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
407,816 |
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
696,760 |
|
|
|
22,427 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
639,590 |
|
|
|
17,497 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
657,788 |
|
|
|
11,071 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
302,339 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
307,142 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
298,468 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
4,442,469 |
|
|
|
218,079 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
4,509,488 |
|
|
|
203,953 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
3,507,771 |
|
|
|
120,398 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
|
6,927,936 |
|
|
|
294,914 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
6,695,139 |
|
|
|
265,729 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
5,571,166 |
|
|
|
156,252 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
400,552 |
|
|
|
17,558 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
364,149 |
|
|
|
14,675 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
333,108 |
|
|
|
11,912 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
318,540 |
|
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
|
149,764 |
|
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
167,930 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
66,742 |
|
|
|
4,695 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,739 |
|
|
|
18,560 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
237,249 |
|
|
|
18,322 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
|
|
|
217,983 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
7,971,767 |
|
|
|
350,007 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
7,513,043 |
|
|
|
309,059 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
6,340,187 |
|
|
|
190,277 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
647,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
94,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
727,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
9,442,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,925,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,587,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread(5) (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
552,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
$ |
584,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
$ |
560,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
Net interest income/Net interest margin (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
264,777 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,507 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
218,086 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
Core net interest margin(7) (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average balances were generally computed using daily balances. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a
tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total
adjustments reflected in the above table are $3.2 million, $1.6 million and $1.3 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005 respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables
and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned
income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free
funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
The core net interest margin excludes the effect of the net interest expense associated with
Wintrusts junior subordinated debentures and the interest expense incurred to fund common stock
repurchases. |
|
(8) |
|
See Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Changes in Interest Income and Expense
The following table shows the dollar amount of changes in interest income (on a tax-equivalent
basis) and expense by major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
attributable to changes in volume or rate for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 Compared to 2006 |
|
2006 Compared to 2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
Due to |
|
Due to |
|
Total |
|
Due to |
|
Due to |
|
Total |
|
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
Change |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
Change |
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Securities |
|
|
4,633 |
|
|
|
(17,436 |
) |
|
|
(12,803 |
) |
|
|
13,536 |
|
|
|
13,724 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreement |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(1,994 |
) |
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity management assets |
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
(19,396 |
) |
|
|
(14,232 |
) |
|
|
15,333 |
|
|
|
14,208 |
|
|
|
29,541 |
|
|
|
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Loans |
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
62,894 |
|
|
|
69,643 |
|
|
|
58,934 |
|
|
|
61,937 |
|
|
|
120,871 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
12,098 |
|
|
|
43,120 |
|
|
|
55,218 |
|
|
|
74,671 |
|
|
|
76,532 |
|
|
|
151,203 |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits interest bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
10,275 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
6,426 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
17,220 |
|
|
|
(3,094 |
) |
|
|
14,126 |
|
|
|
51,354 |
|
|
|
32,201 |
|
|
|
83,555 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense deposits |
|
|
22,648 |
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
29,185 |
|
|
|
73,790 |
|
|
|
35,687 |
|
|
|
109,477 |
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
1,460 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
24,169 |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
|
40,948 |
|
|
|
80,834 |
|
|
|
37,948 |
|
|
|
118,782 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
(12,071 |
) |
|
|
26,341 |
|
|
|
14,270 |
|
|
$ |
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
38,584 |
|
|
|
32,421 |
|
|
The changes in net interest income are created by changes in both interest rates and volumes. The
change in the Companys net interest income for the periods under review was predominantly impacted
by the growth in the volume of the overall interest-earning assets (specifically loans) and
interest-bearing deposit liabilities. In the table above, volume variances are computed using the
change in volume multiplied by the previous years rate. Rate variances are computed using the
change in rate multiplied by the previous years volume. The change in interest due to both rate
and volume has been allocated between factors in proportion to the relationship of the absolute
dollar amounts of the change in each.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses totaled $14.9 million in 2007, $7.1 million in 2006, and $6.7
million in 2005. Net charge-offs totaled $10.9 million in 2007, $5.2 million in 2006 and $4.9
million in 2005. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 was 0.74%, 0.71% and 0.77%, respectively. Non-performing loans were $71.9 million and
$36.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in non-performing loans in
2007 as compared to 2006 was primarily the result of $32.3 million related to three credit
relationships. See the Credit Risk and Asset Quality section of this report for more detail on
non-performing loans. In 2007, the Company reclassified $36,000 from its allowance for loan losses
to a separate liability account which represents the portion of the allowance for loan losses that
was associated with lending-related commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters
of credit. In 2006, the Company reclassified $92,000 from the allowance for lending-relating
commitments to its allowance for loan losses. In future periods, the provision for credit losses
may contain both a component related to funded loans (provision for loan losses) and a component
related to lending-related commitments (provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit). Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for inherent
losses in the port-
folio. There can be no assurances however, that future losses will not exceed
the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. The amount of future
additions to the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments will
be dependent upon managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance based on its evaluation
of economic conditions, changes in real estate values, interest rates, the regulatory environment,
the level of past-due and non-performing loans, and other factors. Please refer to the Credit
Risk and Asset Quality section of this report for further discussion of the Companys loan loss
experience and non-performing assets.
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income totaled $80.1 million in 2007, $91.2 million in 2006 and $93.6 million in 2005,
reflecting a decrease of 12% in 2007 compared to 2006, and a decrease of 3% in 2006 compared to
2005. Non-interest income as a percentage of net revenue declined to 23% in 2007 compared to 27%
in 2006 and 30% in 2005. The decline in non-interest income in 2007 compared to 2006 is
attributable to lower levels of trading income recognized on interest rate swaps and mortgage
banking valuation and recourse obligation adjustments in 2007 and the $2.4 million gain on the sale
of the Wayne Hummer Growth Fund in 2006 offset by higher levels of gains on available-for-sale
securities and higher wealth managment fees. The following table presents non-interest income by
category for 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2007 compared to 2006 |
|
2006 compared to 2005 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
Brokerage |
|
$ |
20,346 |
|
|
|
19,615 |
|
|
|
20,154 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
(539 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Trust and asset management |
|
|
10,995 |
|
|
|
12,105 |
|
|
|
9,854 |
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
Total wealth management fees |
|
|
31,341 |
|
|
|
31,720 |
|
|
|
30,008 |
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
25,913 |
|
|
|
(7,453 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(3,572 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
5,983 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Gain on sales of premium
finance receivables |
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Administrative services |
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Gains on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
11,434 |
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(8,277 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Trading income net cash settlement
of swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Trading income (loss) change in fair
market value |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
|
(7,249 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
8,628 |
|
|
|
7,671 |
|
|
|
6,586 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
16,430 |
|
|
|
22,527 |
|
|
|
19,552 |
|
|
|
(6,097 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
80,088 |
|
|
|
91,232 |
|
|
|
93,557 |
|
|
$ |
(11,144 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
$ |
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
Wealth management is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of WHTC and the asset
management fees, brokerage commissions, trading commissions and insurance product commissions
generated by the Wayne Hummer Companies. Trust and asset management fees represent WHTCs trust
fees which include fees earned on assets under management, custody fees and other trust related
fees and WHAMCs fees for advisory services to individuals and institutions, municipal and
tax-exempt organizations, including the management of the Wayne Hummer proprietary mutual funds.
The brokerage income is generated by WHI, the Companys broker-dealer subsidiary.
Brokerage revenue is directly impacted by trading volumes. In 2007, brokerage revenue totaled $20.3
million, reflecting an increase of $731,000, or 4%, compared to 2006. The Company anticipates
continued recognition of revenue enhancement capabilities and continued growth of the wealth
management platform throughout its banking locations. In 2006, brokerage revenue totaled $19.6
million reflecting a decrease of $539,000, or 3%, compared to 2005.
Trust and asset management revenue totaled $11.0 million in 2007, a decrease of $1.1 million, or
9%, compared to 2006. The Wayne Hummer Growth Fund, which was managed by WHAMC and had total
assets of $162 million at December 31, 2005, was sold during the first quarter of 2006 for a gain
of $2.4 million which is included in this category. In 2006, trust and asset management fees
totaled $12.1 million and increased $2.3 million, or 23%, compared to 2005. This increase is
attributable to the $2.4 million gain
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
recorded in 2006 on the sale of the Wayne Hummer Growth Fund.
Trust and asset management fees are based primarily on the market value of the assets under
management or administration. Trust assets and assets under management totaled $1.6 billion at
December 31, 2007, $1.4 billion at December 31, 2006 and $1.6 billion at December 31, 2005.
Mortgage banking includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and servicing
residential real estate loans for the secondary market. Mortgage banking revenue totaled $14.9
million in 2007, $22.3 million in 2006, and $25.9 million in 2005, reflecting a decrease of $7.4
million, or 33%, in 2007, and $3.6 million, or 14%, in 2006. In 2007, the Company recorded $4.2
million in losses related to recourse obligations on residential mortgage loans sold to investors.
These losses primarily related to mortgages originated through wholesale channels which experienced
early payment defaults. Also, in 2007 compared to 2006, the Company recorded an additional $1.8
million in lower of cost or market adjustments for residential mortgage loans held-for-sale. The
remainder of the decrease in mortgage banking is a result of lower origination volumes in 2007
compared to 2006. Future growth of mortgage banking is impacted by the interest rate environment
and will continue to be dependent upon the relative level of long-term interest rates. A
continuation of the existing depressed residential real estate environment may continue to hamper
mortgage banking production growth. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions
of SFAS 156 and elected the fair value measurement method for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs).
Prior to January 1, 2006, MSRs were accounted for at the lower of their initial carrying value, net
of accumulated amortization, or fair value. Included in the 2007 mortgage banking revenue decrease
is $125,000 of MSR valuation adjustment (additional expense) compared to 2006.
Included in the 2006 mortgage banking revenue decrease is $514,000 of MSR valuation
adjustment compared to 2005 amortization expense.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $8.4 million in 2007, $7.1 million in 2006 and $6.0
million in 2005. These increases of 17% in 2007 and 19% in 2006, were due primarily to the overall
larger household account base. The majority of deposit service charges relates to customary fees
on overdrawn accounts and returned items. The level of service charges received is substantially
below peer group levels, as management believes in the philosophy of providing high quality service
without encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables results from the Companys sales of premium finance
receivables to unrelated third parties. However, from the third quarter of 2006 to the third
quarter of 2007, all of the receivables originated by FIFC were purchased by the Banks to more
fully utilize their lending capacity. In the fourth quarter of 2007, due to the Companys average
loan-to-average deposit ratio being consistently above the target of 85% to 90%, the Company
reinstated its program of selling premium finance receivables, with servicing retained, to
unrelated third parties. Having a program in place to sell premium finance receivables to third
parties allows the Company to execute its strategy to be asset-driven while providing the benefits
of additional sources of liquidity and revenue. The level of premium finance receivables sold to
unrelated third parties depends in large part on the capacity of the Banks to retain such loans in
their portfolio and therefore, it is possible that sales of these receivables may occur in the
future.
Loans sold to unrelated third parties totaled $230 million in 2007, $303 million in 2006 and $562
million in 2005, representing 8%, 10% and 21% of FIFCs total originations in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The Company recognized net gains totaling $2.0 million in 2007, $2.9 million in 2006
and $6.5 million in 2005 related to this activity.
As FIFC continues to service the loans sold, it recognizes a retained interest in the loans sold
which consists of a servicing asset, interest only strip and a recourse obligation, upon each sale.
Recognized gains, recorded in accordance with SFAS 140, as well as the Companys retained
interests in these loans are based on the Companys projection of cash flows that will be generated
from the loans. The cash flow model incorporates the amounts FIFC is contractually entitled to
receive from the customer, including an estimate of late fees, the amounts due to the purchaser of
the loans, fees paid to insurance agents as well as estimates of the term of the loans and credit
losses. Significant differences in actual cash flows and the projected cash flows can cause
impairment to the servicing asset and interest only strip as well as the recourse obligation. The
Company monitors the performance of these loans on a static pool basis and adjusts the
assumptions in its cash flow model when warranted. These loans have relatively short maturities
(less than 12 months) and prepayments are not highly correlated to movements in interest rates.
Due to the short-term nature of these loans, the Company believes that the book value of the
servicing asset approximates fair value.
The Company capitalized $2.0 million and amortized $590,000 in servicing assets related to the sale
of these loans in 2007, and capitalized $2.8 million and amortized $4.7 million in servicing assets
related to sale of these loans in 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the Companys retained interest
in the loans sold included a servicing asset of $1.9 million, an interest only strip of $2.6
million and a liability for its recourse obligation of $179,000.
Gains are significantly dependent on the spread between the net yield on the loans sold and the
rate passed on to the purchasers. The net yield on the loans sold and the rates passed on to the
purchasers typically do not react in a parallel fashion, therefore causing the spreads to vary from
period to period. This spread was 3.70% in 2007, compared to 2.62% to 3.24% in 2006 and 2.71% to
3.74% in 2005.
The Company typically makes a clean up call by repurchasing the remaining loans in the pools sold
after approximately ten months from the sale date. Upon repurchase, the loans are recorded in the
Companys premium finance receivables portfolio and any remaining balance of the Companys retained
interest is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale of premium finance receivables. Clean-up
calls resulted in increased gains of $444,000, $761,000, and $248,000 in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The Company continuously monitors the performance of the loan pools to the
projections and adjusts the assumptions in its cash flow model when warranted. Credit losses on
loans sold were estimated at 0.20% of the estimated average balances in 2007, at 0.15% for 2006 and
at a range of 0.15% to 0.25% for 2005. The gains are also influenced by the number of months
these loans are estimated to be outstanding. The estimated average terms of the loans were nine
months in 2007 and in 2006, and eight to nine months in 2005. The applicable discount rate used in
determining gains related to this activity was the same in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, premium finance loans sold and serviced for others for which the
Company retains a recourse obligation related to credit losses totaled approximately $219.9 million
and $58.3 million, respectively. The remaining estimated recourse obligation carried in other
liabilities was approximately $179,000 and $129,000, at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Credit losses incurred on loans sold are applied against the recourse obligation liability that is
established at the date of sale. Credit losses, net of recoveries, for premium finance receivables
sold and serviced for others totaled $129,000 in 2007, $191,000 in 2006 and $269,000 in 2005. At
December 31, 2007, non-performing loans related to this sold portfolio were approximately $180,000,
or less than 1% of the sold loans, compared to $3.5 million, or 6%, of the sold loans at December
31, 2006. The premium finance portfolio owned by the Company had a ratio of non-performing loans
to total loans of 1.80% at December 31, 2007 and 1.07% at December 31, 2006. Ultimate losses on
premium finance loans are substantially less than non-performing loans for the reasons noted in the
Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables portion of the Credit Risk and Asset Quality section
of this report.
Administrative services revenue generated by Tricom was $4.0 million in 2007, $4.6 million in 2006
and $4.5 million in 2005. This revenue comprises income from administrative services, such as data
processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients
located throughout the United States. Tricom also earns interest and fee income from providing
high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing to this same client base, which is included
in the net interest income category. The decrease in revenue in 2007 compared to 2006 is a result
of slower growth in new customer relationships and a decrease in revenue from existing clients. In
2006 compared to 2005, Tricom increased sales volumes with its current client base, however
experienced competitive rate pressures.
Gains on available-for-sale securities totaled $3.0 million in 2007, $17,000 in 2006 and $1.1
million in 2005. Included in gains in 2007 was a $2.5 million gain recognized in the fourth
quarter of 2007 on the Companys investment in an unaffiliated bank holding company that was
acquired by another bank holding company.
Premium income from covered call option transactions totaled $2.6 million in 2007, $3.2 million in
2006 and $11.4 million in 2005. The higher fees from covered call options in 2005 was due to the
mix in the types of underlying securities and the volatility in the marketplace that resulted in
higher premiums for the options.
During 2007, call option contracts were written against $1.1 billion of underlying securities,
compared to $1.6 billion in 2006 and $3.3 billion in 2005. The same security may be included in
this total more than once to the extent that multiple call option contracts were written against it
if the initial call option contracts were not exercised. The Company routinely writes call options
with terms of less than three months against certain U.S. Treasury and agency securities held in
its portfolio for liquidity and other purposes. Management enters into these transactions with the
goal of enhancing its overall return on its investment portfolio by using the fees generated from
these options to compensate for net interest margin compression. These option transactions are
designed to increase the total return associated with holding certain investment securities and do
not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. There were no outstanding call option contracts at
December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
The Company recognized trading income related to interest rate swaps not designated in hedge
relationships and the trading account assets of its broker-dealer. Trading income recognized for
the net cash settlement of swaps is income that would have been recognized regardless of whether
the swaps were designated in hedging relationships. However, in the absence of hedge accounting,
the net cash settlement of the swaps is included in trading income rather than net interest income.
Trading income totaled $265,000 in 2007 and $8.8 million in 2006, compared to a loss of $0.9
million in 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $231.1 million of interest rate swaps that were
initially documented at their inception dates as being in hedging relationships with the Companys
variable rate junior subordinated debentures and subordinated notes, but subsequently, management
determined that the hedge documentation did not meet the standards of SFAS 133. In July 2006, the
Company settled its position in these interest rate swap contracts by selling them
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
to third parties. The Company realized approximately $5.8 million from the settlement of these swaps and
eliminated any further earnings volatility due to the changes in fair values.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) generated non-interest income of $4.9 million in 2007, $2.9
million in 2006 and $2.4 million in 2005. This income typically represents adjustments to the cash
surrender value of BOLI policies; however in the third quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a
non-taxable $1.4 million death benefit gain. The Company initially purchased BOLI to consolidate
existing term life insurance contracts of executive officers and to mitigate the mortality risk
associated with death benefits provided for in executive employment contracts and in connection
with certain deferred compensation arrangements. The Company has purchased additional BOLI since
then, including $8.9 million of BOLI that was owned by State Bank of the Lakes and $8.4 million
owned by Hinsbrook Bank when Wintrust acquired these banks. BOLI totaled $84.7 million at December
31, 2007 and $82.1 million at December 31, 2006, and is included in other assets.
Miscellaneous other non-interest income includes loan servicing fees, service charges, rental
income from equipment leases and miscellaneous other income. In 2007, the Company recognized a
$2.6 million gain from the sale of property held by the Company, which was partially offset by $1.4
million of losses recognized on various limited partnership investments. Approximately $1.0
million of these partnership losses relate to a low income housing tax credit investment which
generates tax credits that are recorded directly to income tax expense. The increase in 2006
compared to 2005 is as a result of growth in the Companys balance sheet.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense totaled $242.9 million in 2007, and increased $14.1 million, or 6%, compared
to 2006. In 2006, non-interest expense totaled $228.8 million, and increased $30.1 million, or
15%, compared to 2005. The non-interest expense categories increased as a result of acquisitions
in 2005, 2006 and 2007, the new branch locations opened and the new de novo bank opened at the end
of the first quarter of 2006. In 2007, Wintrust added five locations that added to all categories
of non-interest expense.
The following table presents non-interest expense by category for 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2007 compared to 2006 |
|
2006 compared to 2005 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
141,816 |
|
|
|
137,008 |
|
|
|
118,071 |
|
|
$ |
4,808 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
18,937 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Equipment |
|
|
15,363 |
|
|
|
13,529 |
|
|
|
11,779 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
21,987 |
|
|
|
19,807 |
|
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
10,420 |
|
|
|
8,493 |
|
|
|
7,129 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
5,318 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
5,609 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions 3rd party brokers |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Postage |
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Stationery and supplies |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
FDIC Insurance |
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
22,513 |
|
|
|
22,873 |
|
|
|
19,886 |
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
37,080 |
|
|
|
34,799 |
|
|
|
31,562 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
242,935 |
|
|
|
228,820 |
|
|
|
198,690 |
|
|
$ |
14,115 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
30,130 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Wintrusts net overhead ratio, which is non-interest expense less non-interest income as a percent
of total average assets, was 1.72% in 2007, 1.54% in 2006 and 1.39% in 2005. This ratio has
steadily increased the past few years as the Company has increased staff levels to accommodate new
facilities and growth at existing facilities, while non-interest income from mortgage banking and
fees generated from covered call options have slowed over the past few years.
Salaries and employee benefits is the largest component of non-interest expense, accounting for 58%
of the total in 2007, 60% of the total in 2006 and 59% in 2005. For the year ended December 31,
2007, salaries and employee benefits totaled $141.8 million and increased $4.8 million, or 4%
compared to 2006. Base pay components and the impact of the Hinsbrook and Broadway acquisitions
contributed to the majority of the increase in 2007 compared to 2006. The increase in 2006
compared to 2005 is comprised of fixed and variable compensation components increasing $10.9
million, the adoption of SFAS 123(R) increasing costs by $5.6 million and
total benefits increasing $2.4 million. See Note 18 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on SFAS 123(R). For the year ended
December 31, 2006, salaries and employee benefits
totaled $137.0 million, and increased $18.9 million, or
16%, compared to 2005.
Equipment expense, which includes furniture, equipment
and computer software depreciation and repairs and
maintenance costs, totaled $15.4 million in 2007, $13.5
million in 2006 and $11.8 million in 2005, reflecting
increases of 14% in 2007 and 15% in 2006. These
increases were caused by higher levels of expense
related to the furniture, equipment and computer
software required at new facilities and at existing
facilities due to increased staffing.
Occupancy expense for the years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$22.0 million, $19.8 million and $16.2 million,
respectively, reflecting increases of 11% in 2007 and
22% in 2006. Occupancy expense includes depreciation
on premises, real estate taxes, utilities and
maintenance of premises, as well as net rent expense
for leased premises. Increases in 2007 and 2006
reflect the increases in the number of facilities
operated as well as market increases in operating costs
of such facilities.
Data processing expenses totaled $10.4 million in 2007,
$8.5 million in 2006 and $7.1 million in 2005,
representing increases of 23% in 2007 and 19% in 2006.
The increases are primarily due to the additional costs
of acquired banks, new branch facilities at existing
banks and the overall growth of loan accounts.
Advertising and marketing expenses totaled $5.3 million
for 2007, $5.1 million for 2006 and $5.0 million for
2005. Marketing costs are necessary to attract loans
and deposits at the newly chartered banks, to announce
new branch openings as well as the expansion of the
wealth management business, to continue to promote
community-based products at the more established
locations and, in 2007, to promote the Companys
commercial banking capabilities. The level of
marketing expenditures depends on the type of marketing
programs utilized which are determined based on the
market area, targeted audience, competition and various
other factors. Management continues to utilize
targeted marketing programs in the more mature market
areas.
Professional fees include legal, audit and tax fees,
external loan review costs and normal regulatory exam
assessments. These fees totaled $7.1 million in 2007,
$6.2 million in 2006 and $5.6 million in 2005. The
increase for 2007 is primarily related to increased
legal costs related to non-performing loans. The
increase for 2006 is attributable to the general growth
in the Companys total assets, the expansion of the
banking franchise and the acquisition of Hinsbrook
Bank.
Amortization of other intangibles assets relates to the
amortization of core deposit premiums and customer list
intangibles
established in connection with the application of SFAS
142 to business combinations. See Note 8 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on these intangible assets.
Commissions paid to 3rd party brokers primarily
represent the commissions paid on revenue generated by
WHI through its network of unaffiliated banks.
FDIC insurance totaled $3.7 million in 2007 and $0.9
million in both 2006 and 2005. The significant
increase in 2007 is a result of a higher rate structure
imposed on all financial institutions beginning in
2007.
Miscellaneous non-interest expense includes ATM
expenses, correspondent banking charges, directors
fees, telephone, travel and entertainment, corporate
insurance and dues and subscriptions. These expenses
represent a large collection of controllable daily
operating expenses. This category decreased $0.4
million, or 2%, in 2007 and increased $3.0 million, or
15%, in 2006. The decrease in 2007 compared to 2006
reflects managements continued efforts to control
daily operating expenses. The increase in 2006
compared to 2005 is in line with increases in the other
non-interest expense categories for that period and
reflects the growth in the Companys balance sheet.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $28.2
million in 2007, $37.7 million in 2006 and $37.9
million in 2005. The effective tax rates were 33.6%,
36.2% and 36.1% in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Please refer to Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion and analysis of the
Companys tax position, including a reconciliation of
the tax expense computed at the statutory tax rate to
the Companys actual tax expense.
Operating Segment Results
As described in Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Companys operations consist of four
primary segments: banking, premium finance, Tricom and
wealth management. The Companys profitability is
primarily dependent on the net interest income,
provision for credit losses, non-interest income and
operating expenses of its banking segment. The net
interest income of the banking segment includes income
and related interest costs from portfolio loans that
were purchased from the premium finance segment. For
purposes of internal segment profitability analysis,
management reviews the
results of its premium finance segment as if all loans
originated and sold to the banking segment were
retained within that segments operations. Similarly,
for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the
wealth management segment, management allocates the net
interest income earned by the banking segment on
deposit balances of customers of the wealth management
segment to the wealth management segment.
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The banking segments net interest income for the year
ended December 31, 2007 totaled $259.0 million as
compared to $235.2 million for the same period in 2006,
an increase of $23.8 million, or 10%. The increase in
net interest income for 2006 when compared to the total
of $211.7 million in 2005 was $23.5 million, or 11%.
The increase in 2007 compared to 2006 is primarily a
result of an increase in net interest margin which was
attributable to a higher loan-to-deposit ratio and the
shift in deposits away from higher cost retail
certificates of deposit in 2007. The increase in 2006
compared to 2005 was primarily the result of continued
growth in the loan portfolio partially offset by the
effect of a decrease in net interest margin. Total
loans increased 8% in 2007 and 22% in 2006. Provision
for credit losses increased to $14.3 million in 2007
compared to $6.3 million in 2006 and $6.5 million in
2005. The banking segments non-interest income
totaled $36.3 million in 2007, a decrease of $4.3
million, or 11%, when compared to the 2006 total of
$40.6 million. The decrease in non-interest income in
2007 is primarily a result of lower mortgage banking
revenues which were impacted by mortgage banking
valuation and recourse obligation adjustments totaling
$6.0 million. In 2006, non-interest income for the
banking segment decreased $10.4 million, or 20% when
compared to the 2005 total of $51.0 million. The
decrease in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily a result
of a lower level of fees from covered call options and
lower mortgage banking revenues. The banking segments
net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled
$62.3 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 2%, as
compared to the 2006 total of $61.1 million. Net
income for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased
$8.3 million, or 12%, as compared to the 2005 total of
$69.4 million.
The premium finance segments net interest income
totaled $60.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2007 and increased $18.1 million, or 43%, over the
$42.4 million in 2006. This increase was primarily the
result of $275 million of higher average levels of
premium finance receivables compared to 2006. In
November 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
Broadway Premium Funding Corporation which is now
included in the premium finance segment results since
the date of acquisition. Wintrust did not sell any
premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party
financial institution in the third and fourth quarters
of 2006 or the first three quarters of 2007. The
premium finance segments non-interest income totaled
$2.0 million, $2.9 million and $6.5 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Non-interest income for this segment
reflects the gains from the sale of premium finance
receivables to an unrelated third party, as more fully
discussed in the Consolidated Results of Operations
section. Net after-tax profit of the premium finance
segment totaled $29.8 million, $19.6 million and $21.7
million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. New receivable
originations totaled $3.1 billion in 2007, $3.0 billion
in 2006 and $2.7 billion in 2005. The
increases in new volumes each year is indicative of
this segments ability to increase market penetration
in existing markets and establish a presence in new
markets.
The Tricom segment data reflects the business
associated with short-term accounts receivable
financing and value-added out-sourced administrative
services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing
and cash management services that Tricom provides to
its clients in the temporary staffing industry. The
segments net interest income was $3.9 million in 2007
and 2006, and $4.1 million in 2005. Non-interest
income for 2007 was $4.0 million, decreasing $592,000
or 13%, from the $4.6 million reported in 2006.
Revenue trends at Tricom reflect the general staffing
trends of the economy and the entrance of new
competitors in most market places served by Tricom.
The segments net income was $1.4 million in 2007, $1.8
million in 2006 and $1.8 million 2005. The decrease in
net income in 2007 compared to 2006 and 2005 is a
result of growth in new customer relationships offset
by a decrease in revenue from existing clients.
The wealth management segment reported net interest
income of $12.9 million for 2007 compared to $6.3
million for 2006 and $1.4 million for 2005. Net
interest income is comprised of the net interest earned
on brokerage customer receivables at WHI and an
allocation of the net interest income earned by the
banking segment on non-interest bearing and
interest-bearing wealth management customer account
balances on deposit at the Banks. The allocated net
interest income included in this segments
profitability was $11.7 million ($7.2 million after
tax) in 2007 and $5.2 million ($3.2 million after tax)
in 2006. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company
changed the measurement methodology for the net
interest income component of the wealth management
segment. In conjunction with the change in the
executive management team for this segment in the third
quarter of 2006, the contribution attributable to the
wealth management deposits was redefined to measure the
full net interest income contribution. In previous
periods, the contribution from these deposits was
limited to the value as an alternative source of
funding for each bank. As such, the contribution in
previous periods did not capture the total net interest
income contribution of this funding source. Current
executive management of this segment uses this measured
contribution to determine overall profitability.
Wealth management customer account balances on deposit
at the Banks averaged $538.7 million, $465.4 million
and $407.8 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. This segment recorded non-interest
income of $39.3 million for 2007 as compared to $38.0
million for 2006 and $36.6 million in 2005. In 2006,
this segments
non-interest income included a $2.4 million gain on the sale of the Wayne Hummer
Growth Fund. Distribution of wealth management
services through each bank subsidiary continues to be a
focus of the Company as the number of brokers in its
Banks continues to increase. Wealth management revenue
growth generated in the banking locations is
significantly outpacing the growth derived from the
traditional Wayne Hummer Investment downtown Chicago sources. Wintrust is committed to growing the
wealth management segment in order to better service its customers and create a more diversified
revenue stream and continues to focus on reducing the fixed cost structure of this segment to a
variable cost structure. This segment reported net income of $7.7 million for 2007 compared to
$3.3 million for 2006 and a net loss of $589,000 for 2005.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Companys total assets were $9.4 billion at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $203.0 million, or
2%, when compared to the $9.6 billion at December 31, 2006. Total assets increased $1.4 billion,
or 17%, in 2006 over the $8.2 billion at December 31, 2005. In 2007, available-for-sale securities
decreased $535.9 million, while loans increased $305.1 million. In 2006, loans increased $1.3
billion, representing the most significant component of the total asset growth in 2006.
Interest-Earning Assets
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning assets and the
relative percentage of each category to total average earning assets for the periods presented
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,182,205 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
3,647,982 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
$ |
2,931,230 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
652,034 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
641,494 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
621,160 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
335,894 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
365,159 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
401,473 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,264,941 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
989,689 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
847,970 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
248,203 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
229,757 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
195,697 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
33,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,703 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
36,599 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
108,051 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
97,560 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
103,783 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of
unearned income (2) |
|
|
6,824,880 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
6,013,344 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
5,137,912 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Liquidity management assets (3) |
|
|
1,674,719 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,054,798 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,738,725 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other earnings assets (4) |
|
|
24,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets |
|
$ |
8,524,320 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,097,817 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
6,900,281 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
9,442,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,925,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,587,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets to
total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
(2) |
|
Includes non-accrual loans |
|
(3) |
|
Includes available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal
funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
(4) |
|
Includes brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities |
Average earning assets increased $426.5 million, or 5%, in 2007 and $1.2 billion, or 17%, in 2006.
The ratio of average earning assets as a percent of total average assets in 2007 declined slightly
to 90% from 91% in 2006 and 2005.
Total average loans increased $811.5 million, or 14%, in 2007, and $875.4 million, or 17%, in 2006.
The increase in average loans was primarily funded by proceeds from maturing liquidity management
assets and higher levels of average deposits. The average loans to average deposits ratio
increased to 90.1% in 2007 from 82.2% in 2006 and 83.4% in 2005. Due to the increase of the
average loan-to-deposit ratio in 2007 to the high-end of managements
target range of 85% 90%, the Company reinstated its program of selling
premium
finance receivables to unrelated third parties by selling $230.0 million of outstanding balances in
the fourth quarter of 2007. The sale of premium finance receivables is discussed below in more
detail.
Loans. Total loans at December 31, 2007 were $6.8 billion, increasing $305.1 million, or 5%, over
the December 31, 2006 total of $6.5 billion. Average total loans, net of unearned income, totaled
$6.8 billion in 2007, $6.0 billion in 2006 and $5.1 billion in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Average commercial and commercial real estate loans, the largest
loan category, totaled $4.2 billion in 2007, and increased $534.2
million, or 15%, over the average balance in 2006. The average
balance in 2006 increased $716.8 million, or 24%, over the average
balance in 2005. This category comprised 61% of the average
loan portfolio in 2007 and 2006. The growth realized in this category
is attributable to increased business development efforts,
acquisitions, and to a lesser extent the reclassification of $78.6 million
of loans in the fourth quarter of 2006 from the residential real
estate category to commercial and commercial real estate.
In order to minimize the time lag typically experienced by de
novo banks in redeploying deposits into higher yielding earning
assets, the Company has developed lending programs focused on
specialized earning asset niches that generally have large volumes
of homogeneous assets that can be acquired for the Banks portfolios
and possibly sold in the secondary market to generate fee
income. These specialty niches also diversify the Banks loan
portfolios and add higher yielding earning assets that help to
improve the net interest margin. However, these loans may
involve greater credit risk than generally associated with loan
portfolios of more traditional community banks due to marketability
of the collateral, or because of the indirect relationship
the Company has with the underlying borrowers. Specialty loan
programs include premium finance, indirect auto, Tricom
finance receivables, mortgage broker warehouse lending through
Hinsdale Bank, the Community Advantage program at Barrington
Bank, which provides lending, deposit and cash management
services to condominium, homeowner and community
associations and the small aircraft lending program at Crystal
Lake Bank. Other than the premium finance receivables, Tricom
finance receivables and indirect auto, all of the loans generated
by these specialty loan programs are included in commercial
and commercial real estate loans in the preceding table.
Management continues to evaluate other specialized types of
earning assets to assist with the deployment of deposit funds and
to diversify the earning asset portfolio.
Home equity loans averaged $652.0 million in 2007, and
increased $10.5 million, or 2%, when compared to the average
balance in 2006. Home equity loans averaged $641.5 million in
2006, and increased $20.3 million, or 3%, when compared to
the average balance in 2005. Unused commitments on home
equity lines of credit totaled $878.1 million at December 31,
2007 and $846.8 million at December 31, 2006.
Residential real estate loans averaged $335.9 million in 2007,
and decreased $29.3 million, or 8%, from the average balance in
2006. This category includes mortgage loans held-for-sale. By
selling residential mortgage loans into the secondary market, the
Company eliminates the interest-rate risk associated with these
loans, as they are predominantly long-term fixed rate loans, and
provides a source of non-interest revenue. The remaining loans
in this category are maintained within the Banks loan portfolios
and represent mostly adjustable rate mortgage loans and shorter-term
fixed rate mortgage loans.
The Company does not think it has a
significant exposure related to subprime mortgages. WestAmerica,
which originated certain subprime mortgages for sale into the
secondary market, substantially modified its product offerings in the
second quarter of 2007 in an effort to reduce the risk associated
with subprime mortgages. The lower average residential
real estate loans in 2007 have resulted from the Companys
reclassification of $78.6 million of loans in the fourth quarter of
2006, which are now included in commercial and commercial
real estate.
Premium finance receivables are originated through FIFC and to
a lesser extent Broadway. These receivables represent loans to
businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their
commercial insurance policies. All premium finance receivables
originated by FIFC are subject to the Companys credit standards,
and substantially all such loans are made to commercial
customers. The Company rarely finances consumer insurance
premiums.
Average premium finance receivables totaled $1.3 billion in
2007, and accounted for 19% of the Companys average total
loans. Average premium finance receivables increased $275.3
million, or 28%, from the average balance of $989.7 million in
2006. The increase in the average balance of premium finance
receivables is a result of the Companys decision to suspend the
sale of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party
beginning in the third quarter of 2006 and to a lesser extent
from loans acquired through the Broadway acquisition in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Also, in the fourth quarter of 2007, due
to the Companys average loan-to-average deposit ratio being
consistently above the target range of 85% to 90%, the Company
reinstated its program of selling premium finance receivables,
with servicing retained, to unrelated third parties. The
majority of the receivables originated by FIFC are sold to the
Banks and retained in their loan portfolios. Having a program
in place to sell premium finance receivables to third parties
allows the Company to execute its strategy to be asset-driven
while providing the benefits of additional sources of liquidity
and revenue. The level of premium finance receivables sold to
unrelated third parties depends in large part on the capacity of the
Banks to retain such loans in their portfolio and therefore, it is
possible that sales of these receivables may occur in the future. See
Consolidated Results of Operations for further information on
these loan sales. Total premium finance loan originations were
$3.1 billion, $3.0 billion and $2.7 billion in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Indirect consumer loans are comprised primarily of automobile
loans (94% of the indirect portfolio) and boat loans at State
Bank of The Lakes. These loans are financed from networks of
unaffiliated automobile and boat dealers located throughout the
Chicago and southern Wisconsin metropolitan areas with which
the Company has established relationships. Indirect auto loans
are secured by new and used automobiles and generally have an
original maturity of 36 to 72 months with the average actual
maturity estimated to be approximately 40 to 45 months. The
risks associated with the Companys portfolios are diversified
among many individual borrowers. Like other consumer loans,
the indirect consumer loans are subject to the Banks
established credit standards. Management regards substantially all
of these loans as prime quality loans. Management
continually monitors the dealer relationships to ensure
the Banks are not dependent on any one dealer as a
source of such loans. During 2007, 2006 and 2005
average indirect consumer loans totaled $248.2 million,
$229.8 million and $195.7 million, respectively.
Tricom finance receivables represent high-yielding
short-term accounts receivable financing to Tricoms
clients in the temporary staffing industry located
throughout the United States. These receivables may
involve greater credit risks than generally associated
with the loan portfolios of more traditional community
banks depending on the marketability of the collateral.
The principal sources of repayments on the receivables
are payments due to the borrowers from their customers
who are located throughout the United States. The
Company mitigates this risk by employing lockboxes and
other cash management techniques to protect their
interests. Typically, Tricom also provides value-added
out-sourced administrative services to many of these
clients, such as data processing of payrolls, billing
and cash management services, which generate additional
fee income. Average Tricom finance receivables were
$33.6 million in 2007, $41.7 million in 2006 and $36.6
million in 2005. Lower activity from existing clients
and slower growth in new customer relationships has
lead to the decrease in Tricom finance receivables in
2007 compared with 2006. Higher sales volumes with
Tri-coms existing client base coupled with new client
business lead to the higher level of Tricom finance
receivables in 2006 compared with 2005.
Liquidity Management Assets. Funds that are not
utilized for loan originations are used to purchase
investment securities and short-term money market
investments, to sell as federal funds and to maintain
in interest-bearing deposits with banks. The balances
of these assets fluctuate frequently based on deposit
inflows, the level of other funding services and loan
demand. Average liquidity management assets accounted
for 20% of total average earning assets in 2007 and 25%
in 2006 and 2005. Average liquidity management assets
decreased $380.1 million in 2007 compared to 2006, and
increased $316.1 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The
decrease in average liquidity management assets in 2007
is the result of the maturity of various
available-for-sale securities, primarily in the first
half of 2007. As a result of the current interest rate
environment, loan growth and the Companys balance
sheet strategy, not all maturities were replaced with
new purchases. The Company has put in place a deposit
pricing strategy which has resulted in a gradual shift
away from dependence upon retail certificates of
deposits and resulted in an increase in the average
loan-to-average-deposit ratio. The increase in average
liquidity management assets in 2006 compared to 2005
was a result of increases in average
deposits and other funding sources exceeding increases
in average loans in 2006.
Other earning assets. Average other earning assets
include trading account securities and brokerage
customer receivables at WHI. In the normal course of
business, WHI activities involve the execution,
settlement, and financing of various securities
transactions. WHIs customer securities activities are
transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin
transactions, WHI, under an agreement with the
out-sourced securities firm, extends credit to its
customers, subject to various regulatory and internal
margin requirements, collateralized by cash and
securities in customers accounts. In connection with
these activities, WHI executes and the out-sourced firm
clears customer transactions relating to the sale of
securities not yet purchased, substantially all of
which are transacted on a margin basis subject to
individual exchange regulations. Such transactions may
expose WHI to off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in
volatile trading markets, in the event margin
requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses
that customers may incur. In the event a customer
fails to satisfy its obligations, WHI, under an
agreement with the outsourced securities firm, may be
required to purchase or sell financial instruments at
prevailing market prices to fulfill the customers
obligations. WHI seeks to control the risks associated
with its customers activities by requiring customers
to maintain margin collateral in compliance with
various regulatory and internal guidelines. WHI
monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to
such guidelines, requires customers to deposit
additional collateral or to reduce positions when
necessary.
Deposits and Other Funding Sources
The dynamics of community bank balance sheets are
generally dependent upon the ability of management to
attract additional deposit accounts to fund the growth
of the institution. As the Banks and branch offices
are still relatively young, the generation of new
deposit relationships to gain market share and
establish themselves in the community as the bank of
choice is particularly important. When determining a
community to establish a de novo bank, the Company
generally will enter a community where it believes the
new bank can gain the number one or two position in
deposit market share. This is usually accomplished by
initially paying competitively high deposit rates to
gain the relationship and then by introducing the
customer to the Companys unique way of providing local
banking services.
Deposits. Total deposits at December 31, 2007, were
$7.5 billion, decreasing $398 million, or 5%, compared
to the $7.9 billion at December 31, 2006. Average
deposit balances in 2007 were $7.6 billion, reflecting
an increase of $257 million, or 4%, compared to the average balances
in 2006. During 2006, average deposits increased $1.2
billion, or 19%, compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The decrease in year end deposits in 2007 over 2006 reflects the Companys initiatives in 2007 to
reduce the level of higher rate certificates of deposit. During 2007, the Companys retail deposit
pricing strategies focused on shifting the mix of deposits away from certificates of deposit into
lower rate and more variable rate NOW and money market accounts.
The following table presents the composition of average deposits by product category for each of
the last three years (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing deposits |
|
$ |
647,715 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
623,542 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
592,879 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
938,960 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
774,481 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
699,323 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Wealth management
deposits |
|
|
547,408 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
464,438 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
407,816 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Money market
accounts |
|
|
696,760 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
639,590 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
657,788 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
302,339 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
307,142 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
298,468 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Time certificates
of deposit |
|
|
4,442,469 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4,509,488 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
3,507,771 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
7,575,651 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,318,681 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
6,164,045 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of WHI and the trust and asset
management customers managed by Wayne Hummer Trust Company which have been placed into deposit
accounts of the Banks (Wealth management deposits in table above). Consistent with reasonable
interest rate risk parameters, the funds have generally been invested in loan production of the
Banks as well as other investments suitable for banks.
The following table presents average deposit balances for each Bank and the relative percentage of
total consolidated average deposits held by each Bank during each of the past three years (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Lake Forest Bank |
|
$ |
1,060,954 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
1,048,493 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
947,014 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Hinsdale Bank(3) |
|
|
1,037,514 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
888,430 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
740,092 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
North Shore Bank |
|
|
781,699 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
819,010 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
767,464 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Libertyville Bank |
|
|
798,522 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
741,231 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
662,330 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Barrington Bank |
|
|
700,728 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
707,620 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
653,509 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
470,586 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
457,486 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
410,168 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Northbrook Bank |
|
|
613,943 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
632,337 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
554,717 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Advantage Bank |
|
|
241,117 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
219,689 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
209,136 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Village Bank(1) |
|
|
491,307 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
504,021 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
359,224 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Beverly Bank |
|
|
141,186 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
138,800 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
83,285 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Wheaton Bank(3) |
|
|
244,158 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
157,440 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
94,194 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Town Bank |
|
|
399,857 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
358,295 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
283,548 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
State Bank of The Lakes |
|
|
428,653 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
418,805 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
399,364 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Old Plank Trail
Bank(2) |
|
|
108,887 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44,569 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Charles
Bank(3) |
|
|
56,540 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
182,455 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
7,575,651 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,318,681 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
6,164,045 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
Percentage increase
from prior year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2005, represents effect on consolidated average deposits from effective acquisition date of
March 31, 2005 for First Northwest Bank, which was merged with Village Bank. At December 31, 2005,
Village Bank had total deposits of $498.0 million. |
|
(2) |
|
For 2006, represents effect on consolidated average deposits from effective organization date
of March 23, 2006 for Old Plank Trail Bank. At December 31, 2006, Old Plank Trail Bank had total
deposits of $92.0 million. |
|
(3) |
|
For 2006, represents effect on consolidated average deposits from
effective acquisition date of May 31, 2006 for Hinsbrook Bank. Branches (and related deposits) from
Hinsbrook Bank were sold to Hinsdale Bank and Wheaton Bank in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Hinsbrooks Geneva branch was renamed St. Charles Bank. |
Other Funding Sources. Although deposits are the Companys primary source of funding its
interest-earning assets, the Companys ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is
somewhat limited by customer preferences and market competition. As a result, in addition to
deposits and the issuance of equity securities, as well as the retention of earnings, the Company
uses several other funding sources to support its growth. These other sources include short-term
borrowings, notes payable, FHLB advances, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures. The
Company evaluates the terms and unique characteristics of each source, as well as its
asset-liability management position, in determining the use of such funding sources.
The composition of average other funding sources in 2007, 2006 and 2005 is presented in the
following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
Average |
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
Balance |
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
51,979 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
6,913 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Federal Home Loan
Bank advances |
|
|
400,552 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
364,149 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
333,108 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
66,742 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Short-term
borrowings |
|
|
264,743 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
140,968 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
152,575 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures |
|
|
249,739 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
237,249 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
217,983 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other funding
sources |
|
$ |
1,043,831 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
817,904 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
769,021 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Notes payable balances represent the balances on a credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank. This credit facility is available for corporate purposes such as to provide capital to fund continued growth at existing bank subsidiaries,
possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate matters. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, the Company had $60.7 million and $12.8 million, respectively, of notes payable outstanding.
See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the terms of this
credit facility.
FHLB advances provide the Banks with access to fixed rate funds which are useful in mitigating
interest rate risk and achieving an acceptable interest rate spread on fixed rate loans or
securities. FHLB advances to the Banks totaled $415.2 million at December 31, 2007, and $325.5
million at December 31, 2006. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion of the terms of these advances.
The Company borrowed $75.0 million under three separate $25 million subordinated note agreements.
Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth
year of the note and has terms of ten years with final maturity dates in 2012, 2013 and 2015. These
notes qualify as Tier II regulatory capital. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion of the terms of the notes.
Short-term borrowings include securities sold under repurchase agreements and federal funds
purchased. These borrowings totaled $252.6 million and $159.9 million at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Securities sold under repurchase agreements primarily represent sweep accounts
for certain customers in connection with master repurchase agreements at the Banks. This funding
category fluctuates based on customer preferences and daily liquidity needs of the Banks, their
customers and the Banks operating subsidiaries.
The Company has $249.7 million of junior subordinated debentures outstanding as of December 31,
2007. The amounts reflected on the balance sheet represent the junior subordinated debentures
issued to nine trusts by the Company and equal the amount of the preferred and common securities
issued by the trusts. On September 1, 2006, the Company issued $51.5 million of 6.84% fixed rate
junior subordinated debentures in connection with a private placement of the related Trust
Preferred Securities and on September 5, 2006, the Company used the proceeds from this issuance to
redeem at par $32.0 million of 9.0% fixed rate junior subordinated debentures originally issued in
1998. See Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Companys
junior subordinated debentures.
Junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain limitations, currently qualify as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Interest expense on these debentures is deductible for tax purposes, resulting in
a cost-efficient form of regulatory capital.
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Shareholders Equity. Total shareholders equity was
$739.6 million at December 31, 2007 reflecting a
decrease of $33.7 million from the December 31, 2006
total of $773.3 million. In 2006, shareholders equity
increased $145.4 million over the December 31, 2005
balance. During 2007, shareholders equity increased
$47.8 million as a result of earnings retention ($55.7
million of net income less dividends of $7.8 million),
$10.8 million due to stock-based compensation costs,
$8.9 million from the issuance of shares (including
related tax benefits) pursuant to various stock-based
compensation plans and $4.1 million from other
comprehensive income, net of tax. Shareholders equity
decreased $105.9 million in 2007 as a result of the
purchase of 2,506,717 shares of treasury stock, at an
average price of $42.23 per share.
The $145.4 million increase in shareholders equity in
2006 was primarily due to the retention of $59.5
million of earnings
($66.5 million of net income less dividends of $7.0
million), $57.1 million due to stock issued in business
combinations, $11.6 million from the issuance of
200,000 new shares in final settlement of a forward
sale agreement of the companys common stock, $17.3
million due to stock-based compensation costs pursuant
to the adoption of SFAS 123R, $14.2 million from the
issuance of shares (including related tax benefits)
pursuant to various stock-based compensation plans and
$1.1 million from the cumulative effect adjustment of a
change in accounting for MSRs pursuant to the adoption
of SFAS 156. Shareholders equity decreased $16.3
million in 2006 as a result of the purchase of 344,089
shares of treasury stock, at an average price of $47.50
per share.
CREDIT RISK AND ASSET QUALITY
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for credit losses during the last five
years (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses at beginning of
year |
|
$ |
46,055 |
|
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
|
34,227 |
|
|
|
25,541 |
|
|
|
18,390 |
|
Provision for credit
losses |
|
|
14,879 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
6,676 |
|
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
10,999 |
|
Allowance acquired in
business combinations |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
Reclassification
from/(to) allowance for
lending-related
commitments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
commercial real
estate loans |
|
|
8,958 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
Residential real
estate loans |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other
loans |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Premium finance
receivables |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
Indirect consumer
loans |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Tricom finance
receivables |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
13,537 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
6,523 |
|
|
|
4,870 |
|
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
commercial real
estate loans |
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Residential real
estate loans |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Consumer and other
loans |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Premium finance
receivables |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Indirect consumer
loans |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Tricom finance
receivables |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(10,871 |
) |
|
|
(5,229 |
) |
|
|
(4,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses at end of year |
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
|
|
46,055 |
|
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
|
34,227 |
|
|
|
25,541 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
lending-related
commitments
at end of year |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit
losses at end of year |
|
$ |
50,882 |
|
|
|
46,512 |
|
|
|
40,774 |
|
|
|
34,227 |
|
|
|
25,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
(recoveries) by
category
as a percentage of
its own respective
categorys average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
commercial real
estate loans |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
Residential real
estate loans |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Consumer and other
loans |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Premium finance
receivables |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Indirect consumer
loans |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
Tricom finance
receivables |
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans, net
of unearned
income |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a
percentage of the
provision
for credit losses |
|
|
73.07 |
% |
|
|
74.10 |
% |
|
|
73.71 |
% |
|
|
43.22 |
% |
|
|
49.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end total loans |
|
$ |
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
|
|
5,213,871 |
|
|
|
4,348,346 |
|
|
|
3,297,794 |
|
Allowance for loan
losses as a percentage
of loans at end
of year |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
Allowance for credit
losses as a percentage
of loans at end
of year |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Risk Elements in the Loan Portfolio
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance
for losses on lending-related commitments by major loan type and the percentage of loans in each
category to total loans (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses allocation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
38,995 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
$ |
32,943 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
$ |
28,288 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
20,016 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
7,421 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4,838 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
46,055 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
40,283 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
34,227 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
25,541 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance category as a percent of
total allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
50,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has determined that the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments were adequate at December 31, 2007. The Companys loan rating process
is an integral component of the methodology utilized in determining the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses. The Company utilizes a loan rating system to assign risk to loans and utilizes
that risk rating system to assist in developing the Problem Loan Report as a means of reporting
non-performing and potential problem loans. At each scheduled meeting of the Boards of Directors
of the Banks and the Wintrust Risk Management Committee, a Problem Loan Report is presented,
showing loans that are non-performing and loans that may warrant additional monitoring.
Accordingly, in addition to those loans disclosed under Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets,
there are certain loans in the portfolio which management has identified, through its Problem Loan
Report, which exhibit a higher than normal credit risk. These Problem Loan Report credits are
reviewed individually by management to determine whether any specific reserve amount should be
allocated for each respective credit. However, these loans are still performing and, accordingly,
are not included in non-performing loans. Managements philosophy is to be proactive and
conservative in assigning risk ratings to loans and identifying loans to be included on the Problem
Loan Report. The principal amount of loans on the Companys Problem Loan Report (exclusive of those
loans reported as non-performing) as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, was approximately
$142.1 million and $84.7 million, respectively. The increase in 2007 is primarily a result of
Problem Loan Report credits in the commercial and commercial real estate category. We believe
these loans are performing and, accordingly, do not cause management to have serious doubts as to
the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms.
In 2004, the Company refined its methodology for
determining certain elements of the allowance for loan
losses. This refinement resulted in allocation of the
allowance to specific loan portfolio groupings. The
Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at a
level believed adequate by management to absorb
probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and is
based on the size and current risk characteristics of
the loan portfolio, an assessment of Problem Loan
Report loans and actual loss experience, changes in the
composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss
experience, changes in lending policies and procedures,
including underwriting standards and collections,
charge-off and recovery practices, changes in the
experience, ability and depth of lending management and
staff, changes in national and local economic and
business conditions and developments, including the
condition of various market segments and changes in the
volume and severity of past due and classified loans
and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled
debt restructurings and other loan modifications. The
allowance for loan losses also includes an element for
estimated probable but undetected losses and for
imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate
the allowance. The methodology used since 2004 refined
the process so that this element was calculated for
each loan portfolio grouping. In prior years, this
element of the allowance was associated with the loan
portfolio as a whole rather than with a specific loan
portfolio grouping. In 2007, the increase in the
amount of allowance for loan losses can be primarily
attributed to the potential losses for loans on the
Companys Problem Loan Report, specifically commercial
and commercial real estate. Determination of the
allowance is inherently subjective as it requires
significant estimates, including the amounts and timing
of expected future cash flows on impaired loans,
estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of
current environmental factors and economic trends, all
of which may be susceptible to significant change.
Loan losses are charged off against the allowance,
while recoveries are credited to the allowance. A
provision for credit losses is charged to operations
based on managements periodic evaluation of the
factors previously mentioned, as well as other
pertinent factors. Evaluations are conducted at least
quarterly and more frequently if deemed necessary.
The Company also maintains an allowance for
lending-related commitments, specifically unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit, to provide for the
risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The
allowance for lending-related commitments relates to
certain amounts that the Company is committed to lend
but for which funds have not yet been disbursed and is
computed using a methodology similar to that used to
determine the allowance for loan losses. This
allowance is included in other liabilities on the
Consolidated Statement of Condition while the
corresponding provision for these losses is recorded as
a component of the provision for credit losses.
An analysis of commercial and commercial real estate
loans actual loss experience is conducted to assess
reserves established for credits with similar risk
characteristics. An allowance is established for loans
on the Problem Loan Report and for pools of loans based
on the loan types and the risk ratings assigned. The
Company separately measures the fair value of impaired
commercial and commercial real estate loans using
either the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the
observable market price of the loan, or the fair value
of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Problem Loan Report loans, which include nonperforming
loans, are subject to impairment valuation. Commercial
and commercial real estate loans continue to represent
a larger percentage of the Companys total loans
outstanding. The credit risk of commercial and
commercial real estate loans is largely influenced by
the impact on borrowers of general economic conditions,
which can be challenging and uncertain. Historically
low net charge-offs of commercial and commercial
real-estate loans may not be indicative of future
charge-off levels. The home equity, residential real
estate, consumer and other loan allocations are based
on analysis of historical delinquency and charge-off
statistics and trends and the current economic
environment. Allocations for niche loans such as
premium finance receivables, indirect consumer and
Tricom finance receivables are based on an analysis of
historical delinquency and charge-off statistics,
historical growth trends and historical economic
trends.
The allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2007,
increased $4.3 million to $50.4 million from December
31, 2006. The allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of total loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006
was 0.74% and 0.71%, respectively. As a percent of
average total loans, total net charge-offs for 2007 and
2006 were 0.16% and 0.09%, respectively. While
management believes that the allowance for loan losses
is adequate to provide for losses inherent in the
portfolio, there can be no assurances that future
losses will not exceed the amounts provided for,
thereby affecting future earnings. In 2007, the
Company reclassified $36,000 from its allowance for
loan losses to its allowance for lending-related
commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and
letters of credit. In 2006, the Company reclassified $92,000 from the allowance for
lending-related commitments to its allowance for loan
losses. The allowance for credit losses is comprised
of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for
lending-related commitments. In future periods, the
provision for credit losses may contain both a
component related to funded loans (provision for loan
losses) and a component related to lending-related
commitments (provision for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit).
Commercial and commercial real estate loans represent
the largest loan category in the Companys loan
portfolio, accounting for 65% of total loans at
December 31, 2007. Net charge-offs in this category
totaled $7.2 million, or 0.17% of average loans in this
category in 2007, and $2.2 million, or 0.06% of average
loans in this category in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Premium finance receivable loans represent the second largest loan category in the Companys
portfolio, accounting for 16% of total loans at December 31, 2007. Net charge-offs totaled $1.9
million in 2007 as compared to $2.2 million in 2006. Net charge-offs were 0.15% of average premium
finance receivables in 2007 versus 0.22% in 2006. As noted in the next section of this report,
non-performing premium finance receivables as a percent of total premium finance receivables were
1.80% at December 31, 2007 and 1.07% at December 31, 2006.
Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets
The following table classifies the Companys non-performing assets as of December 31 for each of
last five years. The information in the table should be read in conjunction with the detailed
discussion following the table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity(1) |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
14,742 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
5,211 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans past due greater than 90 days
and still accruing |
|
|
24,013 |
|
|
|
13,365 |
|
|
|
7,496 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity(1) |
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
33,267 |
|
|
|
12,959 |
|
|
|
11,712 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
9,646 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
8,112 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
7,396 |
|
|
|
5,994 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual |
|
|
47,841 |
|
|
|
23,509 |
|
|
|
18,693 |
|
|
|
13,724 |
|
|
|
18,964 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity(1) |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
48,009 |
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
19,428 |
|
|
|
12,418 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
11,265 |
|
|
|
9,433 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
71,854 |
|
|
|
36,874 |
|
|
|
26,189 |
|
|
|
18,588 |
|
|
|
23,740 |
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
75,712 |
|
|
|
37,446 |
|
|
|
27,589 |
|
|
|
18,588 |
|
|
|
24,108 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans by category
as a percent of its own respective categorys
year end balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity(1) |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as a
percentage of total assets |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of non-performing loans |
|
|
70.13 |
% |
|
|
124.90 |
% |
|
|
153.82 |
% |
|
|
184.13 |
% |
|
|
107.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residential real estate and home equity loans that are non-accrual and past due greater than 90
days and still accruing do not include non-performing mortgage loans held-for-sale. These loans
totaled $2.0 million as of December 31, 2007. Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower
of cost or market applied on an aggregate basis by loan type. Charges related to adjustments to
record the loans at fair value are recognized in mortgage banking revenue. |
Non-performing Residential Real Estate and
Home Equity
The non-performing residential real estate and home
equity loans totaled $3.3 million at December 31, 2007.
The balance increased $1.2 million from December 31,
2006. This category of non-performing loans consists
of 14 individual credits representing eight home equity
loans and six residential real estate loans. The
average balance of loans in this category is
approximately $233,000. On average, this is less than
one residential real estate loan or home equity loan
per chartered bank within the Company and the control
and collection of these loans is very manageable. Each
non-performing credit is well secured and in the
process of collection. Management does not expect any
material losses from the resolution of any of the
credits in this category.
Non-performing Commercial, Consumer and Other
The commercial, consumer and other non-performing loan
category totaled $48.0 million as of December 31, 2007.
The balance in this category increased $26.6 million
from December 31, 2006. The increase in the
non-performing loans since December 31, 2006 was
primarily the result of $32.3 million related to three
credit relationships.
One of the relationships, totaling approximately $15.8
million, relates to two residential real estate
developments in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago that
are partially developed and were acquired as a result of
the Hinsbrook Bank acquisition. Current market
conditions have substantially slowed the sale of single
family home lots. The Company believes the projects have
reasonable long term viability; however, given the
current state of the residential real estate market,
the ultimate resolution of these problem loans could span
a lengthy period of time until market conditions
stabilize. The Company is working on various scenarios
to minimize the holding periods and future losses, if
any.
Another addition to this non-performing loan category
relates to a credit that approximates $10.4 million
secured by a low rise apartment complex that is being
converted to condominiums. The project is located in
one of the Companys primary market areas. Sales have
slowed on the project to levels less than originally
projected. This loan was initially structured with
significant equity and mezzanine debt subordinate to
our position resulting in a conservative loan-to-value
position at the inception of the loan. The Company
believes that the current market conditions may have
impacted the valuation of the property, but not to a
level where our principal is at substantial risk. We
believe our first lien position relative to the value
of the collateral to be favorable. Management of the
Company believes that there is reasonable interest in
this property from investors and anticipates a
relatively quick resolution to this situation.
The other significant addition to this category of
non-performing loans is a $6.1 million loan
relationship made to a long-time commercial customer of
the Company who is involved in several small
residential developments in the northern suburbs of
Chicago. The slowdown in the residential real estate
market has impacted the borrowers ability to service
the debt; however, sales do continue at a slower than
projected pace. The loan relates to a variety of
properties and these properties are not concentrated in
any one development. Based on the Companys evaluation
of the collateral, we believe our loan is adequately
secured at this time and anticipate that this loan will
be resolved during 2008 as a result of collateral
liquidations.
Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables
The table below presents the level of non-performing
premium finance receivables as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the amount of net charge-offs for the years
then ended (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Non-performing premium
finance receivables |
|
$ |
19,428 |
|
|
$ |
12,418 |
|
- as a percent of premium
finance receivables outstanding |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs of premium
finance receivables |
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
- annualized as a percent of average
premium finance receivables |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
As noted below, fluctuations in this category may occur
due to timing and nature of account collections from
insurance carriers. Management is comfortable with
administering the collections at this level of non-performing premium
finance receivables and expects that such ratios will
remain at relatively low levels.
The ratio of non-performing premium finance receivables
fluctuates throughout the year due to the nature and
timing of canceled account collections from insurance
carriers. Due to the nature of collateral for premium
finance receivables, it customarily takes 60-150 days
to convert the collateral into cash collections. Accordingly, the level of non-performing
premium finance receivables is not necessarily
indicative of the loss inherent in the portfolio. In
the event of default, Wintrust has the power to cancel
the insurance policy and collect the unearned portion
of the premium from the insurance carrier. In the
event of cancellation, the cash returned in payment of
the unearned premium by the insurer should generally be
sufficient to cover the receivable balance, the
interest and other charges due. Due to notification
requirements and processing time by most insurance
carriers, many receivables will become delinquent
beyond 90 days while the insurer is processing the
return of the unearned premium. Interest continues to
accrue until maturity as the unearned premium is
usually sufficient to pay-off the outstanding
balance and contractual interest due.
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Non-performing Indirect Consumer Loans
Total non-performing indirect consumer loans were $1.1
million at December 31, 2007, compared to $673,000 at
December 31, 2006. The ratio of these non-performing
loans to total indirect consumer loans was 0.45% at
December 31, 2007 compared to 0.27% at December 31,
2006. As noted in the Allowance for Credit Losses
table, net charge-offs as a percent of total indirect
consumer loans were 0.28% for the year ended December
31, 2007 compared to 0.17% in the same period in 2006.
The level of nonperforming and net charge-offs of
indirect consumer loans continues to be below standard
industry ratios for this type of lending.
Potential Problem Loans
Management believes that any loan where there are
serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to
comply with the present loan repayment terms should be
identified as a non-performing loan and should be
included in the disclosure of Past Due Loans and
Non-performing Assets. Accordingly, at the periods
presented in this report, the Company has no potential
problem loans as defined by SEC regulations.
Loan Concentrations
Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there
are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in
similar activities which would cause them to be similarly
impacted by economic or other conditions. The Company
had no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total
loans at December 31, 2007, except for loans included
in the premium finance operating segment, which are
diversified throughout the United States.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION
A banking organizations assets and liabilities are
primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of inflation
do not have as great an impact on the financial
condition of a bank as do changes in interest rates.
Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at
the same percentage as does inflation. Accordingly,
changes in inflation are not expected to have a
material impact on the Company. An analysis of the
Companys asset and liability structure provides the
best indication of how the organization is positioned
to respond to changing interest rates.
Asset-Liability Management
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of
fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a
reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of
yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in
conjunction with the boards of directors of the Banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk
Management Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. The policies establish guidelines for
acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in
interest rates.
Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are
different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in
disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Companys
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The
Company continuously monitors not only the organizations current net interest margin, but also the
historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse
changes in net interest income in future years as a result of interest rate fluctuations by
performing simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse
change in net interest margin and/or net income is identified, management would take appropriate
actions with its asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse situations.
Please refer to earlier sections of this discussion and analysis for further discussion of the net
interest margin.
Since the Companys primary source of interest bearing liabilities is customer deposits, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by
customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the Banks operate. The
rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Companys interest earning assets result primarily
from the Companys strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit
its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an acceptable interest rate
spread.
One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into
derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments
with similar characteristics. See Note 21 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information
on the Companys derivative financial instruments.
During 2007 and 2006, the Company also entered into certain covered call option transactions
related to certain securities held by the Company. The Company uses these option transactions
(rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such as interest rate floors)
to increase the total return associated with the related securities. Although the revenue received
from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income, the increased
return attributable to the related securities from these options contributes to the Companys
overall profitability. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk may be affected by these
transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed-rate term debt or use financial
derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding as of December 31, 2007 or
December 31, 2006.
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the
Risk Management Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Banks and the Company. The objective
is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial
instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income.
Tools used by management include a standard gap analysis and a rate simulation model whereby
changes in net interest income are measured in the event of various changes in interest rate
indices. An institution with more assets than liabilities re-pricing over a given time frame is
considered asset sensitive and will generally benefit from rising rates, and conversely, a higher level of re-pricing liabilities versus assets
would generally be beneficial in a declining rate environment.
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Standard gap analysis reflects contractual re-pricing information for assets, liabilities and
derivative financial instruments. While the gap position and related ratios illustrated in the
following table are useful tools that management can use to assess the general positioning of the
Companys and its subsidiaries balance sheets, it is only as of a point in time and static in
nature. The following table illustrates the Companys estimated interest rate sensitivity and
periodic and cumulative gap positions based on contractual re-pricing and maturities as of December
31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time to Maturity or Repricing |
|
|
0-90 |
|
91-365 |
|
1-5 |
|
Over 5 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Days |
|
Days |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
$ |
90,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,964 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
10,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,410 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
382,162 |
|
|
|
131,865 |
|
|
|
276,996 |
|
|
|
512,814 |
|
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity management assets |
|
|
483,536 |
|
|
|
131,865 |
|
|
|
276,996 |
|
|
|
512,814 |
|
|
|
1,405,211 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (1) |
|
|
3,727,333 |
|
|
|
1,517,815 |
|
|
|
1,487,716 |
|
|
|
178,290 |
|
|
|
6,911,154 |
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
25,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,777 |
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
4,236,646 |
|
|
|
1,649,680 |
|
|
|
1,764,712 |
|
|
|
691,104 |
|
|
|
8,342,142 |
|
Other non-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026,717 |
|
|
|
1,026,717 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets (RSA) |
|
$ |
4,236,646 |
|
|
|
1,649,680 |
|
|
|
1,764,712 |
|
|
|
1,717,821 |
|
|
|
9,368,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (2) |
|
$ |
4,162,455 |
|
|
|
1,949,766 |
|
|
|
694,525 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
6,807,177 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
10,701 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
179,486 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
415,183 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
254,434 |
|
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,134 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
191,887 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,662 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
4,694,477 |
|
|
|
2,021,690 |
|
|
|
925,558 |
|
|
|
220,431 |
|
|
|
7,862,156 |
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664,264 |
|
|
|
664,264 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,884 |
|
|
|
102,884 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of derivative financial instruments (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (Company pays fixed, receives floating) |
|
|
(175,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity including effect
of derivative financial instruments (RSL) |
|
$ |
4,519,477 |
|
|
|
2,021,690 |
|
|
|
1,010,558 |
|
|
|
1,817,134 |
|
|
|
9,368,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repricing gap (RSA RSL) |
|
$ |
(282,831 |
) |
|
|
(372,010 |
) |
|
|
754,154 |
|
|
|
(99,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative repricing gap |
|
$ |
(282,831 |
) |
|
|
(654,841 |
) |
|
|
99,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative RSA/Cumulative RSL |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative RSA/Total assets |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative RSL/Total assets |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP/Total assets |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP/Cumulative RSA |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgage loans held-for-sale and nonaccrual loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-contractual interest-bearing deposits are subject to immediate withdrawal and, therefore,
are included in 0-90 days. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes interest rate swaps to qualified commercial customers as they are offset with interest
rate swaps entered into with third parties and have no effect on the Companys interest rate
sensitivity. See Note 21 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these
interest rate swaps. |
As seen in the table, the Companys gap analysis as of December 31, 2007, reflects that the Company
is in a negative gap position, which generally indicates the Company would benefit from a declining
rate environment. However, the shape of the yield curve, an institutions funding sources and
deposit mix, and the inability to have negative interest rates can create undue margin compression
even for liability sensitive institutions operating in a low interest rate environment.
As a result of the static position and inherent limitations of gap analysis, management uses an
additional measurement tool to evaluate its asset-liability sensitivity that determines exposure to
changes in interest rates by measuring the percentage change in net interest income due to changes
in interest rates over a two-year time horizon. Management measures its exposure to changes in
interest rates using many different interest rate scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized
is to measure the percentage change in net interest income assuming an instantaneous permanent
parallel shift in the yield curve of 100 and 200 basis points, both upward and downward. Utilizing
this measurement concept, the interest rate risk of the Company, expressed as a percentage change
in net interest income over a two-year time horizon due to changes in interest rates, at December
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 |
|
+ 100 |
|
- 100 |
|
- 200 |
|
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
|
|
Percentage change in net interest
income due to an immediate 200 basis point shift in the yield curve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(7.2 |
)% |
|
These results are based solely on an instantaneous permanent parallel shift in the yield curve
and do not reflect the net interest income sensitivity that may arise from other factors, such as
changes in the shape of the yield curve or changes in the spread between key market rates. The
above results are conservative estimates due to the fact that no management actions to mitigate
potential changes in net interest income are included in this simulation process. These management
actions could include, but would not be limited to, delaying a change in deposit rates, extending
the maturities of liabilities, the use of derivative financial instruments, changing the pricing
characteristics of loans or modifying the growth rate of certain types of assets or liabilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company and the Banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements established by the
federal banking agencies that take into account risk attributable to balance sheet and off-balance
sheet activities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
and possibly discretionary actions by regulators, that if undertaken could have a direct
material effect on the Companys financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Banks must meet specific
capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Companys assets, liabilities, and
certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Federal
Reserves capital guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of
qualifying total
capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, of which at least 4.0% must be in the form of Tier 1
Capital. The Federal Reserve also requires a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 Capital to total
assets of 3.0% for strong bank holding companies (those rated a composite 1 under the Federal
Reserves rating system). For all other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio of Tier 1
Capital to total assets is 4.0%. In addition the Federal Reserve continues to consider the Tier 1
leverage ratio in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities. The following table
summarizes the capital guidelines for bank holding companies, as well as the Companys capital
ratios as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wintrusts |
|
Wintrusts |
|
Wintrusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well |
|
Ratios at |
|
Ratios at |
|
Ratios at |
|
|
Minimum |
|
Capitalized |
|
Year-end |
|
Year-end |
|
Year-end |
|
|
Ratios |
|
Ratios |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital
to Risk-Weighted Assets |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Total Capital
to Risk-Weighted Assets |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Total average equity to total
average assets |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
As reflected in the table, each of the Companys capital ratios at December 31, 2007, exceeded the
well-capitalized ratios established by the Federal Reserve. Refer to Note 19 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the capital positions of the Banks.
The Companys principal sources of funds at the holding company level are dividends from its
subsidiaries, borrowings under its loan agreement with an unaffiliated bank and proceeds from the
issuances of subordinated debt, junior subordinated debentures and additional equity. Refer to
Notes 11, 13, 15 and 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the
Companys notes payable, subordinated note, junior subordinated debentures and shareholders
equity, respectively. Management is committed to maintaining the Companys capital levels above the
Well Capitalized levels established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.
On March 30, 2005, Wintrust consummated the partial settlement of the forward sale agreement the
Company entered into on December 14, 2004 with Royal Bank of Canada, an affiliate of RBC Capital
Markets Corporation, relating to the forward sale by Wintrust of 1.2 million shares of Wintrusts
common stock. Pursuant to and in partial settlement of the forward sale agreement, Wintrust issued
1.0 million shares of its common stock, and received net proceeds of $55.8 million from Royal Bank
of Canada. Additionally, on December 14, 2005, Wintrust amended certain terms of the forward sale
agreement for the purpose of extending the maturity date for the remaining 200,000 shares from
December 17, 2005 to December 17,
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
2006. In conjunction with the completion of the acquisition of HBI in May 2006, the forward sale
agreement was fully settled with Wintrust issuing 200,000 shares of its common stock and receiving
net proceeds of $11.6 million. The Company issued 1,120,033 shares of common stock in May 2006 in
connection with the acquisition of HBI.
Banking laws impose restrictions upon the amount of dividends that can be paid to the holding
company by the Banks. Based on these laws, the Banks could, subject to minimum capital
requirements, declare dividends to the Company without obtaining regulatory approval in an amount
not exceeding (a) undivided profits, and (b) the amount of net income reduced by dividends paid for
the current and prior two years. In addition, the payment of dividends may be restricted under
certain financial covenants in the Companys revolving credit line agreement. At January 1, 2008,
subject to minimum capital requirements at the Banks, approximately $28.5 million was available as
dividends from the Banks without prior regulatory approval. However, since the Banks are required
to maintain their capital at the well-capitalized level (due to the Company being approved as a
financial holding company), funds otherwise available as dividends from the Banks are limited to
the amount that would not reduce any of the Banks capital ratios below the well-capitalized level.
At January 1, 2008, approximately $17.0 million was available as dividends from the Banks without
compromising the Banks well-capitalized positions. During 2007, 2006 and 2005 the subsidiaries
paid dividends to Wintrust totaling $105.9 million, $183.6 million and $45.1 million, respectively.
The Company declared its first semi-annual cash dividend on its common stock in 2000 and has
increased the dividend each year thereafter. The dividend payout ratio was 14.3% in 2007, 10.9% in
2006 and 8.7% in 2005. The Company continues to target an earnings retention ratio of
approximately 85% to 90% to support continued growth. The $0.32 cash dividend per share paid in
2007 represented a 14% increase over the $0.28 cash dividend per share paid in 2006. Along those
same lines, the semi-annual dividend of $0.18 per share in January 2008 represents (on an
annualized basis) $0.36 per share, or a 13% increase over 2007.
In July 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2.0 million
shares of the Companys outstanding common stock over 18 months. Through April 2007, the Company
repurchased a total of approximately 1.8 million shares at an average price of $45.74 per share
under the July 2006 share repurchase plan. In April 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
terminated the July 2006 authorization and authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 1.0
million shares of the Companys outstanding common stock over 12 months. The Company began to
repurchase shares under the this authorization in July 2007 and repurchased all 1.0 million shares
at an average price of $37.57 per share during the third
and fourth quarters of 2007. In January 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to an additional 1.0 million shares of the Companys outstanding common stock over
the next 12 months.
Liquidity management at the Banks involves planning to meet anticipated funding needs at a
reasonable cost. Liquidity management is guided by policies, formulated and monitored by the
Companys senior management and each Banks asset/liability committee, which take into account the
marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of unfunded
commitments. The Banks principal sources of funds are deposits, short-term borrowings and capital
contributions from the holding company. In addition, the Banks are eligible to borrow under
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and certain Banks are eligible to borrow at the Federal Reserve
Bank Discount Window, another source of liquidity.
Core deposits are the most stable source of liquidity for community banks due to the nature of
long-term relationships generally established with depositors and the security of deposit insurance
provided by the FDIC. Core deposits are generally defined in the industry as total deposits less
time deposits with balances greater than $100,000. Approximately 55% of the Companys total assets
were funded by core deposits at the end of 2007 and 2006. The remaining assets were funded by
other funding sources such as time deposits with balances in excess of $100,000, borrowed funds and
equity capital. Due to the affluent nature of many of the communities that the Company serves,
management believes that many of its time deposits with balances in excess of $100,000 are also a
stable source of funds.
Liquid assets refer to money market assets such as Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits
with banks, as well as available-for-sale debt securities. Net liquid assets represent the sum of
the liquid asset categories less the amount of assets pledged to secure public funds. At December
31, 2007, net liquid assets totaled approximately $191.4 million, compared to approximately $346.7 million at December
31, 2006.
The Banks routinely accept deposits from a variety of municipal entities. Typically, these
municipal entities require that banks pledge marketable securities to collateralize these public
deposits. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Banks had approximately $780.8 million and $910.1
million, respectively, of securities collateralizing such public deposits and other short-term
borrowings. Deposits requiring pledged assets are not considered to be core deposits, and the
assets that are pledged as collateral for these deposits are not deemed to be liquid assets.
The Company is not aware of any known trends, commitments, events, regulatory recommendations or
uncertainties that would have any adverse effect on the Companys capital resources, operations or
liquidity.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments,
that may require future cash payments.
Contractual Obligations. The following table presents, as of December 31, 2007, significant fixed
and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Further discussion of
the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the Consolidated Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due In |
|
|
Note |
|
One Year |
|
1 - 3 |
|
3 - 5 |
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|
or Less |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
5 Years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Deposits(1) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
6,743,086 |
|
|
|
519,731 |
|
|
|
208,424 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
7,471,537 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
59,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
60,700 |
|
FHLB advances(1) (2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
15,698 |
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
415,198 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
200,057 |
|
|
|
21,877 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,434 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures(1) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
16,777 |
|
|
|
31,595 |
|
Purchase obligations(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,425 |
|
|
|
19,921 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
41,595 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,047,025 |
|
|
|
608,797 |
|
|
|
435,668 |
|
|
|
508,062 |
|
|
|
8,599,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes basis adjustment for purchase accounting valuations. |
|
(2) |
|
Certain advances provide the FHLB with call dates which are not reflected in the above
table. |
|
(3) |
|
Purchase obligations presented above primarily relate to certain contractual obligations for
services related to the construction of facilities, data processing and the outsourcing of certain
operational activities. |
The Company also enters into derivative contracts under which the Company is required to either
receive cash from or pay cash to counterparties depending on changes in interest rates.
Derivative contracts are carried at fair value representing the net present value of expected
future cash receipts or payments based on market rates as of the balance sheet date. Because the
derivative liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2007 do not represent the
amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts, these liabilities are not included in
the table of contractual obligations presented above.
Commitments. The following table presents a summary of the amounts and expected maturities of
significant commitments as of December 31, 2007. Further information on these commitments is
included in Note 20 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
1 - 3 |
|
3 - 5 |
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
or Less |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
5 Years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Commitment type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, commercial real estate and construction |
|
$ |
1,201,230 |
|
|
|
334,497 |
|
|
|
171,812 |
|
|
|
144,699 |
|
|
|
1,852,238 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
113,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,640 |
|
Revolving home equity lines of credit |
|
|
878,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878,102 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
104,103 |
|
|
|
65,434 |
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
173,219 |
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans |
|
|
218,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Contingent Liabilities. In connection with the sale of
premium finance receivables, the Company continues to
service the receivables and maintains a recourse
obligation to the purchasers should the underlying
borrowers default on their obligations. The estimated
recourse obligation is taken into account in recording the sale, effectively
reducing the gain recognized. As of December 31, 2007,
outstanding premium finance receivables sold to and
serviced for third parties for which the Company has a
recourse obligation were $219.9 million and the
estimated recourse obligation was $179,000 and included
in other liabilities on the balance sheet. Please
refer to the Consolidated Results of Operations section
of this report for further discussion of these loan
sales.
The Company enters into residential mortgage loan sale
agreements with investors in the normal course of
business. These agreements usually require certain
representations concerning credit information, loan documentation, collateral and
insurability. On occasion, investors have requested
the Company to indemnify them against losses on certain
loans or to repurchase loans which the investors
believe do not comply with applicable representations.
Upon completion of its own investigation, the Company
generally repurchases or provides indemnification on
certain loans. Indemnification requests are generally
received within two years subsequent to sale.
Management maintains a liability for estimated losses
on loans expected to be repurchased or on which
indemnification is expected to be provided and
regularly evaluates the adequacy of this recourse
liability based on trends in repurchase and
indemnification requests, actual loss experience, known
and inherent risks in the loans, and current economic
conditions. At December 31, 2007 the liability for
estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification was
$1.9 million and was included in other liabilities on
the balance sheet.
Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
170,190 |
|
|
|
169,071 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements |
|
|
90,964 |
|
|
|
136,221 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with
banks |
|
|
10,410 |
|
|
|
19,259 |
|
Available-for-sale securities,
at fair value |
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
24,206 |
|
|
|
24,040 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
109,552 |
|
|
|
148,331 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan
losses |
|
|
50,389 |
|
|
|
46,055 |
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
6,751,213 |
|
|
|
6,450,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
339,297 |
|
|
|
311,041 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and
other assets |
|
|
273,678 |
|
|
|
180,889 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
276,204 |
|
|
|
268,936 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
17,737 |
|
|
|
21,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,368,859 |
|
|
|
9,571,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
664,264 |
|
|
|
699,203 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
6,807,177 |
|
|
|
7,170,037 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
7,471,441 |
|
|
|
7,869,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
415,183 |
|
|
|
325,531 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
254,434 |
|
|
|
162,072 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,662 |
|
|
|
249,828 |
|
Accrued interest payable and
other liabilities |
|
|
102,884 |
|
|
|
104,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,629,304 |
|
|
|
8,798,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no
shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; $1.00 stated value;
60,000,000
shares
authorized; 26,281,296 and 25,802,024
shares issued at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
26,281 |
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
539,127 |
|
|
|
519,233 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,850,806 and 344,089 shares at
December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively |
|
|
(122,196 |
) |
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
Common stock warrants |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
309,556 |
|
|
|
261,734 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(13,672 |
) |
|
|
(17,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
|
773,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
9,368,859 |
|
|
|
9,571,852 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
525,610 |
|
|
|
456,384 |
|
|
|
335,391 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
Securities |
|
|
79,402 |
|
|
|
93,398 |
|
|
|
66,555 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
611,557 |
|
|
|
557,945 |
|
|
|
407,036 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
294,914 |
|
|
|
265,729 |
|
|
|
156,252 |
|
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
17,558 |
|
|
|
14,675 |
|
|
|
11,912 |
|
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
Interest on subordinated notes |
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
4,695 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
18,560 |
|
|
|
18,322 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
350,007 |
|
|
|
309,059 |
|
|
|
190,277 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
261,550 |
|
|
|
248,886 |
|
|
|
216,759 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,879 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
6,676 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
246,671 |
|
|
|
241,829 |
|
|
|
210,083 |
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management |
|
|
31,341 |
|
|
|
31,720 |
|
|
|
30,008 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
25,913 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
5,983 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
6,499 |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
11,434 |
|
Gains on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,802 |
|
|
|
19,370 |
|
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
80,088 |
|
|
|
91,232 |
|
|
|
93,557 |
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
141,816 |
|
|
|
137,008 |
|
|
|
118,071 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
15,363 |
|
|
|
13,529 |
|
|
|
11,779 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
21,987 |
|
|
|
19,807 |
|
|
|
16,176 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
10,420 |
|
|
|
8,493 |
|
|
|
7,129 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
5,318 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
5,609 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
Other |
|
|
37,080 |
|
|
|
34,799 |
|
|
|
31,562 |
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
242,935 |
|
|
|
228,820 |
|
|
|
198,690 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
83,824 |
|
|
|
104,241 |
|
|
|
104,950 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
28,171 |
|
|
|
37,748 |
|
|
|
37,934 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
income |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
stock |
|
|
warrants |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
equity |
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,729 |
|
|
|
319,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
139,566 |
|
|
|
(7,358 |
) |
|
|
473,912 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
67,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
Other
comprehensive
loss, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
losses on
securities,
net of
reclassification
adjustment |
|
|
(11,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,081 |
) |
|
|
(11,081 |
) |
Unrealized
gains on
derivative
instruments |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income |
|
|
56,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New issuance,
net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
54,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,845 |
|
Business
combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
29,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,587 |
|
Exercise of
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,153 |
|
Restricted stock
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
851 |
|
Employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
Exercise of
common stock
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
Director
compensation
plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,941 |
|
|
|
420,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
201,133 |
|
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
|
|
627,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
Other
comprehensive
income, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains on
securities,
net of
reclassification
adjustment |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
Unrealized
losses on
derivative
instruments |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income |
|
|
67,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
Cumulative effect
of change in
accounting
for
mortgage
servicing
rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,282 |
|
Common stock issued
for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New issuance,
net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,584 |
|
Business
combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
55,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,088 |
|
Exercise of
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
11,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,718 |
|
Restricted stock
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
Exercise of
common stock
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
Director
compensation
plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,802 |
|
|
|
519,233 |
|
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
261,734 |
|
|
|
(17,761 |
) |
|
|
773,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
55,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,653 |
|
Other
comprehensive
income, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains on
securities,
net of
reclassification
adjustment |
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
Unrealized
losses on
derivative
instruments |
|
|
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income |
|
$ |
59,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,853 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,846 |
|
Common stock issued
for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
6,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,816 |
|
Restricted stock
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
Employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
Exercise of
common stock
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
Director
compensation
plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,281 |
|
|
|
539,127 |
|
|
|
(122,196 |
) |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
309,556 |
|
|
|
(13,672 |
) |
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,879 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
6,676 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,010 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(4,837 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
345 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
10,845 |
|
|
|
12,159 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
arrangements |
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
(4,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net amortization (accretion) of premium on securities |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
2,638 |
|
Fair market value change of interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,809 |
) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights fair value change and
amortization, net |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Originations and purchases of mortgage loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,949,742 |
) |
|
|
(1,971,894 |
) |
|
|
(2,196,638 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
1,997,445 |
|
|
|
1,922,284 |
|
|
|
2,227,636 |
|
Bank owned life insurance, net of claims |
|
|
(3,521 |
) |
|
|
(2,948 |
) |
|
|
(2,431 |
) |
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
|
(6,499 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in trading securities, net |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
1,989 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
Gain on mortgage loans sold |
|
|
(12,341 |
) |
|
|
(12,736 |
) |
|
|
(10,054 |
) |
Gain on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sales of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other
assets, net |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
(7,867 |
) |
|
|
(5,140 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and
other liabilities, net |
|
|
(5,496 |
) |
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
115,376 |
|
|
|
41,392 |
|
|
|
116,906 |
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
801,547 |
|
|
|
857,199 |
|
|
|
384,840 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
252,706 |
|
|
|
372,613 |
|
|
|
1,068,470 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(586,817 |
) |
|
|
(1,069,596 |
) |
|
|
(1,827,642 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
229,994 |
|
|
|
302,882 |
|
|
|
561,802 |
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(11,594 |
) |
|
|
(51,070 |
) |
|
|
(79,222 |
) |
Net decrease (increase) in interest bearing deposits
with banks |
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
(6,819 |
) |
|
|
(7,191 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(487,676 |
) |
|
|
(1,211,300 |
) |
|
|
(1,007,090 |
) |
Redemptions of Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(42,829 |
) |
|
|
(64,824 |
) |
|
|
(47,006 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities |
|
|
165,486 |
|
|
|
(870,915 |
) |
|
|
(953,039 |
) |
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
(397,938 |
) |
|
|
717,044 |
|
|
|
1,038,247 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other borrowings, net |
|
|
39,801 |
|
|
|
63,476 |
|
|
|
(133,755 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net |
|
|
47,950 |
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank advances,
net |
|
|
89,698 |
|
|
|
(36,080 |
) |
|
|
22,815 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of junior subordinated
debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Redemption of junior subordinated debentures, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,050 |
) |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of subordinated note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
arrangements |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
55,845 |
|
Issuance of common stock resulting from exercise of
stock options, employee
stock purchase plan and conversion of common stock
warrants |
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
8,769 |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(105,853 |
) |
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(7,831 |
) |
|
|
(6,961 |
) |
|
|
(5,449 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
(325,000 |
) |
|
|
793,450 |
|
|
|
1,001,472 |
|
|
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(44,138 |
) |
|
|
(36,073 |
) |
|
|
165,339 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
305,292 |
|
|
|
341,365 |
|
|
|
176,026 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
261,154 |
|
|
|
305,292 |
|
|
|
341,365 |
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
351,795 |
|
|
|
304,088 |
|
|
|
183,804 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
|
30,992 |
|
|
|
33,281 |
|
|
|
28,618 |
|
Acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired, including cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
59,683 |
|
|
|
483,723 |
|
|
|
707,406 |
|
Value ascribed to goodwill and other intangible
assets |
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
79,832 |
|
|
|
92,597 |
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed |
|
|
53,095 |
|
|
|
448,409 |
|
|
|
660,452 |
|
Non-cash activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,088 |
|
|
|
30,587 |
|
Transfer to other real estate owned from loans |
|
|
5,427 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
Loans transferred from held-for-sale to
portfolio |
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Description of the Business
Wintrust Financial Corporation (Wintrust or the
Company) is a financial holding company currently
engaged in the business of providing traditional
community banking services to cus-tomers in the Chicago
metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin.
Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank
subsidiaries.
Wintrust has 15 wholly-owned bank subsidiaries
(collectively, the Banks), nine of which the Company
started as de novo institutions, including Lake Forest
Bank & Trust Company (Lake Forest Bank), Hinsdale
Bank & Trust Company (Hinsdale Bank), North Shore
Community Bank & Trust Company (North Shore Bank),
Libertyville Bank & Trust Company (Libertyville
Bank), Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A.
(Barrington Bank), Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company,
N.A. (Crystal Lake Bank), Northbrook Bank & Trust
Company (Northbrook Bank), Beverly Bank & Trust
Company, N.A. (Beverly Bank) and Old Plank Trail
Community Bank, N.A. (Old Plank Trail Bank). The
Company acquired Advantage National Bank (Advantage
Bank) in October 2003, Village Bank & Trust (Village
Bank) in December 2003, Northview Bank & Trust
(Northview Bank) in September 2004, Town Bank in
October 2004, State Bank of The Lakes in January 2005,
First Northwest Bank in March 2005 and Hinsbrook Bank
and Trust (Hinsbrook Bank) in May 2006. In December
2004, Northview Banks Wheaton branch became its main
office, it was renamed Wheaton Bank & Trust (Wheaton
Bank) and its two Northfield locations became branches
of Northbrook Bank and its Mundelein location became a
branch of Libertyville Bank. In May 2005, First
Northwest Bank was merged into Village Bank. In
November 2006, Hinsbrook Banks Geneva branch was
renamed St. Charles Bank & Trust (St. Charles Bank),
its Willowbrook, Downers Grove and Darien locations
became branches of Hinsdale Bank and its Glen Ellyn
location became a branch of Wheaton Bank.
The Company provides, on a national basis, loans to
businesses to finance insurance premiums on their
commercial insurance policies (premium finance
receivables) through First Insurance Funding
Corporation (FIFC). FIFC is a wholly-owned
sub-sidiary of Crabtree Capital Corporation
(Crabtree) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake
Forest Bank.
In November 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium
Funding Corporation (Broadway). Broadway also
provides loans to businesses to finance insurance premiums, mainly through insurance agents and
brokers in the northeastern portion of the United
States and California. Broadway is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FIFC.
Wintrust, through Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (Tricom),
provides high-yielding short-term accounts receivable
financing (Tricom finance receivables) and
value-added out-sourced administrative services, such
as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash
management services, to the temporary staffing
industry, with clients located throughout the United
States. Tricom is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hinsdale Bank.
The Company provides a full range of wealth management
services through its trust, asset management and
broker-dealer subsidiaries. Trust and investment
services are provided at the Banks through the
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Hummer Trust
Company, N.A. (WHTC), a de novo company started in
1998. Wayne Hummer Investments, LLC (WHI) is a
broker-dealer providing a full range of private client
and securities brokerage services to clients located
primarily in the Midwest. WHI has office locations
staffed by one or more registered financial advisors in
a majority of the Companys Banks. WHI also provides a
full range of investment services to individuals
through a network of relationships with community-based
financial institutions primarily in Illinois. WHI is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of North Shore Bank. Focused
Investments LLC was a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHI
and was merged into WHI in December 2006. Wayne Hummer
Asset Management Company (WHAMC) provides money
management services and advisory services to
individuals, institutions and municipal and tax-exempt
organizations, in addition to portfolio management and
financial supervision for a wide range of pension and
profit-sharing plans. WHAMC is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Wintrust. WHI, WHAMC and Focused were
acquired in 2002, and are collectively referred to as
the Wayne Hummer Companies. In February 2003, the
Company acquired Lake Forest Capital Management
(LFCM), a registered investment advisor, which was
merged into WHAMC.
In May 2004, the Company acquired SGB Corporation d/b/a
WestAmerica Mortgage Company (WestAmerica) and its
affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc.
(Guardian). WestAmerica engages primarily in the
origination and purchase of residential mortgages for
sale into the secondary market, and Guardian provides
document preparation and other loan closing services to
WestAmerica and a network of mortgage brokers.
WestAmerica maintains principal origination offices in
nine states, including Illinois, and originates loans
in other states through wholesale and correspondent
offices. WestAmerica and
Guardian are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Barrington
Bank.
Wintrust Information Technology Services Company
(WITS) provides information technology support, item
capture, imaging and statement preparation services to
the Wintrust subsidiaries and is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Wintrust.
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust and
its subsidiaries conform to generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States and
prevailing practices of the banking industry. In the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements,
management is required to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts contained
in the consolidated financial statements. Management
believes that the estimates made are reasonable;
however, changes in estimates may be required if
economic or other conditions change beyond managements
expectations. Reclassifications of certain prior year
amounts have been made to conform to the current year
presentation. The following is a summary of the
Companys more significant accounting policies.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust
include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income
available to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects
the potential dilution that would occur if securities
or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised
or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the
earnings of the Company.
Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for by the purchase
method of accounting. Under the purchase method,
assets and liabilities of the business acquired are
recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date
of acquisition with any excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the fair value of the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill.
Results of operations of the acquired business are
included in the income statement from the effective
date of acquisition.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash
flows, Win-trust considers cash on hand, cash items in
the process of collection, non-interest bearing amounts
due from correspondent banks, federal funds sold and
securities purchased under resale agreements with
original maturities of three months or less, to be cash
equivalents.
Securities
The Company classifies securities upon purchase in one
of three categories: trading, held-to-maturity, or
available-for-sale. Trading securities are bought
principally for the purpose of selling them in the near
term. Held-to-maturity securities are those debt
securities in which the Company has the ability and
positive intent to hold until maturity. All other
securities are currently classified as
available-for-sale as they may be sold prior to
maturity.
Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized
cost, which represents actual cost adjusted for premium
amortization and discount accretion using methods that
approximate the effective interest method.
Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities, net of related taxes, are included as
accumulated other comprehensive income and reported as
a separate component of shareholders equity.
Trading account securities are stated at fair value.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses from sales and
fair value adjustments are included in other
non-interest income.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale
or held-to-maturity security below cost that is deemed
other than temporary is charged to earnings, resulting
in the establishment of a new cost basis for the
security. Interest and dividends, including
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts,
are recognized as interest income when earned.
Realized gains and losses for securities classified as
available-for-sale are included in non-interest income
and are derived using the specific identification
method for determining the cost of securities sold.
Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements and
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
Securities purchased under resale agreements and
securities sold under repurchase agreements are
generally treated as collateralized financing
transactions and are recorded at the amount at which
the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued
interest. Securities, generally U.S. government and
Federal agency securities, pledged as collateral under
these financing arrangements cannot be sold by the
secured party. The fair value of collateral either
received from or provided to a third party is monitored
and additional collateral is obtained or requested to
be returned as deemed appropriate.
Brokerage Customer Receivables
The Company, under an agreement with an out-sourced
securities clearing firm, extends credit to its
brokerage customers to finance their purchases of
securities on margin. The Company receives income from
interest charged on such extensions of credit.
Brokerage customer receivables represent amounts due on
margin balances. Securities owned by customers are
held as collateral for these receivables.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
Mortgage loans are classified as held-for-sale when
originated or acquired with the intent to sell the loan
into the secondary market. Market conditions or other
developments may change managements intent with
respect to the disposition of these loans and loans
previously classified as mortgage loans held-for-sale
may be reclassified to the loan portfolio. Loans that
are transferred between mortgage loans held-for-sale
and the loan portfolio are recorded at the lower of
cost or market at the date of transfer.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower
of cost or market applied on an aggregate basis by loan
type. Fair value is based on either quoted prices for
the same or similar loans or values obtained from third
parties. Charges related to adjustments to record the
loans at fair value are recognized in mortgage banking
revenue. When these loans are sold, the loans are
removed from the balance sheet and a gain or loss is
recognized in mortgage banking revenue.
Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for
Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
Loans, which include premium finance receivables,
Tricom finance receivables and lease financing, are
generally reported at the principal amount outstanding,
net of unearned income. Interest income is recognized
when earned. Loan origination fees and certain direct
origination costs are deferred and amortized over the
expected life of the loan as an adjustment to the yield
using methods that approximate the effective interest
method. Finance charges on premium finance receivables
are earned over the term of the loan based on actual
funds outstanding, beginning with the funding date,
using a method which approximates the effective yield
method.
Interest income is not accrued on loans where
management has determined that the borrowers may be
unable to meet contractual principal and/or interest
obligations, or where interest or principal is 90 days
or more past due, unless the loans are adequately
secured and in the process of collection. Cash
receipts on non-accrual loans are generally applied to
the principal balance until the remaining balance is
considered collectible, at which time interest income
may be recognized when received.
The Company allocates the allowance for loan losses to
specific loan portfolio groups and maintains its
allowance for loan losses at a level believed adequate
by management to absorb probable losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is based
on the size and current risk characteristics of the
loan portfolio, an assessment of Problem Loan Report
loans and actual loss experience, changes in the
composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss
experience, changes in lending policies and procedures,
including underwriting standards and collections,
charge-off and recovery practices, changes in the
experience, ability and depth of lending management and
staff, changes in national and local economic and
business conditions and developments, including the
condition of various market segments and changes in the
volume and severity of past due and classified loans
and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled
debt restructurings and other loan modifications. The
allowance for loan losses also includes an element for
estimated probable but undetected losses and for
imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate
the allowance. The Company reviews Problem Loan Report
loans on a case-by-case basis to allocate a specific
dollar amount of allowance, whereas all other loans are
reserved for based on assigned allowance percentages
evaluated by loan groupings. The loan groupings
utilized by the Company are commercial and commercial
real estate, residential real estate, home equity,
premium finance receivables, indirect consumer, Tricom
finance receivables and consumer. Determination of the
allowance is inherently subjective as it requires
significant estimates, including the amounts and timing
of expected future cash flows on impaired loans,
estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of
current environmental factors and economic trends, all
of which may be susceptible to significant change.
Loan losses are charged off against the allowance,
while recoveries are credited to the allowance. A
provision for credit losses is charged to operations
based on managements periodic evaluation of the
factors previously mentioned, as well as other
pertinent factors. Evaluations are conducted at least
quarterly and more frequently if deemed necessary.
In accordance with the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3,
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities
Acquired in a Transfer, loans acquired after January
1, 2005, including debt securities, are recorded at the
amount of the Companys initial investment and no
valuation allowance is carried over from the seller for
individually-evaluated loans that have evidence of
deterioration in credit quality since origination, and
for which it is probable all contractual cash flows on
the loan will be unable to be collected. Also, the
excess of all undiscounted cash flows expected to be
collected at acquisition over the purchasers initial
investment are recognized as interest income on a
level-yield basis over the life of the loan.
Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be
collected are recognized prospectively through an
adjustment of the loans yield over its remaining life,
while subsequent decreases are recognized as
impairment. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage
loans held-for-sale, and loans to borrowers in good
standing under revolving credit agreements are excluded
from the scope of SOP 03-3.
In estimating expected losses, the Company evaluates
loans for impairment in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 114, Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. A loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that a
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due
pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan.
Impaired loans are generally considered by the Company
to be commercial and commercial real estate loans that
are non-accrual loans, restructured loans or loans with
principal and/or interest at risk, even if the loan is
current with all payments of principal and interest.
Impairment is measured by estimating the fair value of
the loan based on the present value of expected cash
flows, the market price of the loan, or the fair value
of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. If
the estimated fair value of the loan is less than the
recorded book value, a valuation allowance is
established as a component of the allowance for loan
losses.
The Company also maintains an allowance for
lending-related commitments, specifically unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit, to provide for the
risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The
allowance is computed using a methodology similar to
that used to determine the allowance for loan losses.
This allowance is included in other liabilities on the
statement of condition while the corresponding
provision for these losses is recorded as a component
of the provision for credit losses.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company originates mortgage loans for sale to the
secondary market, the majority of which are sold
without retaining servicing rights. There are certain
loans, however, that are originated and sold to
governmental agencies, with servicing rights retained.
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) associated with loans
originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are
capitalized at the time of sale at fair value based on
the future net cash flows expected to be realized for
performing the servicing activities, and included in
other assets in the consolidated statements of
condition. The change in MSR fair value is recorded as
a component of
mortgage banking revenue in non-interest income in the
consolidated statements of income. For purposes of
measuring fair value, a third party valuation is
obtained. This valuation stratifies the servicing
rights into pools based on product type and interest
rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is
calculated based on the present value of estimated
future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate
with the risk associated with that pool, given current
market conditions. Estimates of fair value include
assumptions about prepayment speeds, interest rates and
other factors which are subject to change over time.
Changes in these underlying assumptions could cause the
fair value of mortgage servicing rights to change
significantly in the future. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 156, Accounting for the Servicing of Financial
Assets An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(SFAS 156) on January 1, 2006, the capitalized value
of mortgage servicing rights was carried at the lower
of the initial carrying value, adjusted for
amortization, or estimated fair value.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization are computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets. Useful lives range from two to ten years for
furniture, fixtures and equipment, two to five years
for software and computer-related equipment and seven
to 39 years for buildings and improvements. Land
improvements are amortized over a period of 15 years
and leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the
term of the respective lease. Land and antique
furnishings and artwork are not subject to
depreciation. Expenditures for major additions and
improvements are capitalized, and maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Internal
costs related to the configuration and installation of
new software and the modification of existing software
that provides additional functionality are capitalized.
Long-lived depreciable assets are evaluated
periodically for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Impairment exists when the expected
undiscounted future cash flows of a long-lived asset
are less than its carrying value. In that event, a
loss is recognized for the difference between the
carrying value and the estimated fair value of the
asset based on a quoted market price, if applicable, or
a discounted cash flow analysis. Impairment losses are
recognized in other non-interest expense.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate
acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loans and
is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is
recorded at its estimated fair value less estimated
selling costs at the date of transfer, with any excess
of the related loan balance over the fair value less
expected selling costs charged to the allowance for
loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported
as adjustments to the carrying amount and are recorded
in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon
sale, if any, are also charged to other non-interest
income or expense, as appropriate. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, other real estate owned totaled $3.9
million and $572,000, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an
acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired.
Other intangible assets represent purchased assets
that also lack physical substance but can be
distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or
other legal rights or because the asset is capable of
being sold or exchanged either on its own or in
combination with a related contract, asset or
liability. In accordance with SFAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is
not amortized, but rather is tested for impairment on
an annual basis or more frequently when events warrant.
Intangible assets which have finite lives are
amortized over their estimated useful lives and also
are subject to impairment testing. All of the
Companys other intangible assets have finite lives and
are amortized over varying periods not exceeding ten
years.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company owns bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) on
certain executives. BOLI balances are recorded at
their cash surrender values and are included in other
assets. Changes in the cash surrender values are
included in non-interest income. At December 31, 2007
and 2006, BOLI totaled $84.7 million and $82.1 million,
respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The Company enters into derivative transactions
principally to protect against the risk of adverse
price or interest rate movements on the future cash
flows or the value of certain assets and liabilities.
The Company is also required to recognize certain
contracts and commitments, including certain
commitments to fund mortgage loans held-for-sale, as
derivatives when the characteristics of those contracts
and commitments meet the definition of a derivative.
The Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, which requires that all derivative
instruments be
recorded in the statement of condition at fair value.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been
designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship and further, on the type of hedging
relationship.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge
relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the
fair value of an asset or liability attributable to a
particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are
considered fair value hedges. Derivative instruments
designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure
to variability in expected future cash flows, or other
types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash
flow hedges. Formal documentation of the relationship
between a derivative instrument and a hedged asset or
liability, as well as the risk-management objective
and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction and
an assessment of effectiveness is required at inception
to apply hedge accounting. In addition, formal
documentation of ongoing effectiveness testing is
required to maintain hedge accounting.
Fair value hedges are accounted for by recording the
fair value of the derivative instrument and the fair
value related to the risk being hedged of the hedged
asset or liability on the statement of condition with
corresponding offsets recorded in the income statement.
The adjustment to the hedged asset or liability is
included in the basis of the hedged item, while the
fair value of
the derivative is recorded as a freestanding asset or
liability. Actual cash receipts or payments and related
amounts accrued during the period on derivatives
included in a fair value hedge relationship are
recorded as adjustments to the interest income or
expense recorded on the hedged asset or liability.
Cash flow hedges are accounted for by recording the
fair value of the derivative instrument on the
statement of condition as either a freestanding asset
or liability, with a corresponding offset recorded in
other comprehensive income within shareholders equity,
net of deferred taxes. Amounts are reclassified from
other comprehensive income to interest expense in the
period or periods the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings.
Under both the fair value and cash flow hedge
scenarios, changes in the fair value of derivatives not
considered to be highly effective in hedging the change
in fair value or the expected cash flows of the hedged
item are recognized in earnings as non-interest income
during the period of the change.
Derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges
pursuant to SFAS 133 are reported on the statement of
condition at fair value and the changes in fair value
are recognized in earnings as non-interest income
during the period of the change.
Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate
locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward
commitments for the future delivery of these mortgage
loans are accounted for as derivatives not qualifying
for hedge accounting. Fair values of these mortgage
derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage
rates from the date of the commitments. Changes in the
fair values of these derivatives are included in
mortgage banking revenue.
Periodically, the Company sells options to an unrelated
bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain
securities held within the Banks investment
portfolios. These option transactions are designed
primarily to increase the total return associated with
holding these securities as earning assets. These
transactions do not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS
133 and, accordingly, changes in fair values of these
contracts, are reported in other non-interest income.
There were no covered call option contracts outstanding
as of December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Junior Subordinated Debentures Offering Costs
In connection with the Companys currently outstanding
junior subordinated debentures, approximately $726,000
of offering costs were incurred, including underwriting
fees, legal and professional fees, and other costs.
These costs are included in other assets and are being
amortized as an adjustment to interest expense using a
method that approximates the effective interest method.
As of December 31, 2007, the unamortized balance of
these costs was approximately $384,000. See Note 15
for further information about the junior subordinated
debentures.
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Trust Assets, Assets Under Management and
Brokerage Assets
Assets held in fiduciary or agency capacity for
customers are not included in the consolidated
financial statements as they are not assets of Wintrust
or its subsidiaries. Fee income is recognized on an
accrual basis and is included as a component of
non-interest income.
Administrative Services Revenue
Administrative services revenue is recognized as
services are performed, in accordance with the accrual
method of accounting. These services include providing
data processing of payrolls, billing and cash
management services to Tricoms clients in the
temporary staffing services industry.
Income Taxes
Wintrust and its subsidiaries file a consolidated
Federal income tax return. Income tax expense is based
upon income in the consolidated financial statements
rather than amounts reported on the income tax return.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
as an income tax benefit or income tax expense in the
period that includes the enactment date.
Positions taken in the Companys tax returns may be
subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon
examination. In accordance with FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which
the Company adopted effective January 1, 2007,
uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the
financial statements when it is more likely than not
the positions will be sustained upon examination by the
tax authorities. Such tax positions are both initially
and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax
benefit that is greater than 50% likely being realized
upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full
knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
Interest and penalties on income tax uncertainties are
classified within income tax expense in the income
statement.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted provisions of
FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123R), using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this transition method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning
January 1, 2006, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R
for all share-based payments granted after that date
and based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation for all
share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of December 31, 2005. Results for prior
periods have not been restated.
Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method set forth
in APB 25, as permitted by SFAS 123. The intrinsic
value method provides that compensation expense for
employee stock options is generally not recognized if
the exercise price of the option equals or exceeds the
fair value of the stock on the date of grant. As a
result, for periods prior to 2006, compensation expense
was generally not recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for stock options.
Compensation expense has always been recognized for
restricted share awards. On January 1, 2006, the
Company reclassified $5.2 million of liabilities
related to previously recognized compensation cost for
restricted share awards that had not been vested as of
that date to surplus as these awards represented equity
awards as defined in SFAS 123R.
Compensation cost is measured as the fair value of the
awards on their date of grant. A Black-Scholes model
is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options
and the market price of the Companys stock at the date
of grant is used to estimate the fair value of
restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is
recognized over the required service period, generally
defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded
vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period
for the entire award.
SFAS 123R requires the recognition of stock based
compensation for the number of awards that are
ultimately expected to vest. As a result, recognized
stock compensation expense is reduced for estimated
forfeitures prior to vesting primarily based on
historical forfeiture data. Estimated forfeitures are
reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based
on new facts and circumstances. Prior to January 1,
2006, actual forfeitures were accounted for as they
occurred for purposes of required pro forma stock
compensation disclosures.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises and vesting of restricted shares.
The following table reflects the Companys pro forma net income and earnings per share as if
compensation expense for the Companys stock options, determined based on the fair value at the
date of grant consistent with the method of SFAS 123, had been included in the determination of the
Companys net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
67,016 |
|
Compensation cost of stock options based
on fair value, net of related tax effect |
|
|
(3,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
63,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
Compensation cost of stock options based
on fair value, net of related tax effect |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
Compensation cost of stock options based
on fair value, net of related tax effect |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
|
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Start-up Costs
Start-up and organizational costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive
income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, net of deferred
taxes, and adjustments related to cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes.
Stock Repurchases
The Company periodically repurchases shares of its outstanding common stock through open market
purchases or other methods. Repurchased shares are recorded as treasury shares on the trade date
using the treasury stock method, and the cash paid is recorded as treasury stock.
Sales of Premium Finance Receivables
Sales of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party are recognized in accordance with
SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities. The Company recognizes as a gain or loss the difference between the proceeds
received and the allocated cost basis of the loans. The allocated cost basis of the loans is
determined by allocating the Companys initial investment in the loan between the loan and the
Companys retained interests, based on their relative fair values. The retained interests include
assets for the servicing rights and interest only strip and a liability for the Companys guarantee
obligation pursuant to the terms of the sale agreement. The servicing assets and interest only
strips are included in other assets and the liability for the guarantee obligation is included in
other liabilities. If actual cash flows are less than estimated, the servicing assets and interest
only strips would be impaired and charged to earnings. Loans sold in these transactions have terms
of less than twelve months, resulting in minimal prepayment risk. The Company typically makes a
clean-up call by repurchasing the remaining loans in the pools sold after approximately 10 months
from the sale date. Upon repurchase, the loans are recorded in the Companys premium finance
receivables portfolio and any remaining balance of the Companys retained interest is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on
sale of premium finance receivables.
Variable Interest Entities
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), which addresses the consolidation rules
to be applied to entities defined in FIN 46 as variable interest entities, the Company does not
consolidate its interests in subsidiary trusts formed for purposes of issuing trust preferred
securities. Management believes that FIN 46 is not applicable to its various other investments or
interests.
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, effective
for the Company beginning on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company.
Accounting for Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements
In September 2006, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) consensus on EITF
Issue 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-4). The EITF is limited to the recognition of
a liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar insurance arrangements that
provide a benefit to an employee that extends to postretirement periods. Therefore, the provisions
of EITF 06-4 would not apply to a split-dollar insurance arrangement that provides a specified
benefit to an employee that is limited to the employees active service period with an employer.
EITF is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The effect of initially
applying the guidance would be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning
retained earnings with the option of retrospective application. The adoption of EITF 06-4 did not
materially impact the consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires
expanded disclosure about the information used to measure fair value. The statement applies
whenever other statements require, or permit, assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
The statement does not expand the use of fair value in any
new circumstances and is effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not materially
impact the consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS No. 159 provides entities with an option to report selected financial
assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of
SFAS 159 did not materially impact the consolidated financial statements.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 141(R), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize the full fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at
the acquisition date; the immediate expense recognition of transaction costs; and accounting for
restructuring plans separately from the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited.
Accounting for Written Loan Commitments at Fair Value Through Earnings
In November 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 109 (SAB 109), Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings. SAB 109
states that the expected cash flows related to servicing the loan should be included in the
measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value. Prior to SAB
109, this component of value was not incorporated into the fair value of the loan commitment. SAB
109 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years December 15, 2007. The Company
does not expect SAB 109 to have a material impact to its financial statements.
(3) Available-for-Sale Securities
A summary of the available-for-sale securities portfolio presenting carrying amounts and gross
unrealized gains and losses as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
33,161 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
33,109 |
|
|
|
35,990 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
34,072 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
321,548 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
322,043 |
|
|
|
696,946 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
(6,768 |
) |
|
|
690,574 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
49,376 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
49,127 |
|
|
|
49,602 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
49,209 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
42,802 |
|
|
|
61,246 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
60,080 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
699,166 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(10,602 |
) |
|
|
688,846 |
|
|
|
884,130 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(18,247 |
) |
|
|
866,288 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock and
other equity securities |
|
|
167,591 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
138,283 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,493 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,316,762 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,866,197 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
(29,097 |
) |
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
|
The decrease in U.S. Government agencies as of December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 is
primarily related to the maturity of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) bonds partially offset by new
purchases.
The following table presents the portion of the Companys available-for-sale securities portfolio
which has gross unrealized losses, reflecting the length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
losses existing for |
|
|
losses existing for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
less than 12 months |
|
|
greater than 12 months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
86,993 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
36,099 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
123,092 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
Municipal |
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
16,617 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
26,218 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
18,943 |
|
|
|
(1,515 |
) |
|
|
19,234 |
|
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
38,177 |
|
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
667,570 |
|
|
|
(10,601 |
) |
|
|
668,941 |
|
|
|
(10,602 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
116,908 |
|
|
|
(1,839 |
) |
|
|
749,596 |
|
|
|
(12,801 |
) |
|
|
866,504 |
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of December 31, 2007 represents an
other-than-temporary impairment. All mortgage-backed securities are of
investment grade quality and issued by government-backed agencies. The fair value of available-for-sale securities includes
investments totaling approximately $749.6 million with unrealized losses of $12.8 million, which
have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government
agencies and Mortgage-backed securities totaling $713.7 million with unrealized losses of $10.9
million are primarily fixed-rate investments with temporary impairment resulting from increases in
interest rates since the purchase of the investments. The Company has the intent and ability to
hold these investments until such time as the values recover or until maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, by contractual
maturity, are shown in the following table. Contractual maturities may differ from actual
maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in
the following maturity summary as actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
the underlying mortgages may be called or prepaid without penalties (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
184,645 |
|
|
|
184,739 |
|
|
|
459,736 |
|
|
|
458,858 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
48,381 |
|
|
|
47,392 |
|
|
|
58,404 |
|
|
|
57,814 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
92,708 |
|
|
|
90,998 |
|
|
|
295,613 |
|
|
|
287,258 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
124,271 |
|
|
|
123,952 |
|
|
|
30,031 |
|
|
|
30,005 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
699,166 |
|
|
|
688,846 |
|
|
|
884,130 |
|
|
|
866,288 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB Stock
and other equity |
|
|
167,591 |
|
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
138,283 |
|
|
|
139,493 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,316,762 |
|
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,866,197 |
|
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
|
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company had gross realized gains on sales of available-for-sale
securities of $3.6 million, $510,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. During 2007, 2006 and 2005,
gross realized losses on sales of available-for-sale securities
totaled $628,000, $493,000 and
$40,000, respectively. Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities during 2007, 2006 and
2005, were $253 million, $373 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, securities having a carrying value of $780.8 million and $910.1 million, respectively, were pledged
as collateral for public deposits, trust deposits, FHLB advances and securities sold under
repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2007, there were no securities of a
single issuer, other than U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities, which exceeded 10% of
shareholders equity.
(4) Loans
A summary of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,408,661 |
|
|
|
4,068,437 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
678,298 |
|
|
|
666,471 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
226,686 |
|
|
|
207,059 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,078,185 |
|
|
|
1,165,846 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
241,393 |
|
|
|
249,534 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
|
43,975 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
140,660 |
|
|
|
95,158 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, premium finance receivables were recorded net of unearned income of
$23.3 million and $27.9 million, respectively. Total loans include net deferred loan fees and
costs and fair value purchase accounting adjustments totaling $6.6 million at December 31, 2007 and
$2.0 million at December 31, 2006.
Certain real estate loans, including mortgage loans held-for-sale, and home equity loans with
balances totaling approximately $663.9 million and $607.1 million, at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure the availability of borrowings from certain
Federal agency banks. At December 31, 2007, approximately $461.9 million of these pledged loans
are included in a blanket pledge of qualifying
loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). The remaining $202.0 million of pledged loans was
used to secure potential borrowings at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, the Banks borrowed $415.2 million and $325.5 million, respectively, from the FHLB in
connection with these collateral arrangements. See Note 12 for a summary of these borrowings.
The Companys loan portfolio is generally comprised of loans to consumers and small to medium-sized
businesses located within the geographic market areas that the Banks serve. The premium finance
receivables and Tricom finance receivables portfolios are made to customers on a national basis and
the majority of the indirect consumer loans are generated through a network of local automobile
dealers. As a result, the Company strives to maintain a loan portfolio that is diverse in terms of
loan type, industry, borrower and geographic concentrations. Such diversification reduces the
exposure to economic downturns that may occur in different segments of the economy or in different
industries.
It is the policy of the Company to review each prospective credit in order to determine the
appropriateness and, when required, the adequacy of security or collateral necessary to obtain when
making a loan. The type of collateral, when required, will vary from liquid assets to real estate.
The Company seeks to assure access to collateral, in the event of default, through adherence to
state lending laws and the Companys credit monitoring procedures.
(5) Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for
Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan
losses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Allowance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
46,055 |
|
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
|
34,227 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,879 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
6,676 |
|
Allowance acquired in
business combinations |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
Reclassification from/(to)
allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
Charge-offs |
|
|
(13,537 |
) |
|
|
(8,477 |
) |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of year |
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
|
|
46,055 |
|
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
The Company also maintains an allowance for
lending-related commitments, specifically unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit. The balance of the
allowance for lending-related commitments was $493,000
and $457,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
A summary of non-accrual and impaired loans and their
impact on interest income as well as loans past due
greater than 90 days and still accruing interest are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
(as of year-end) |
|
$ |
47,841 |
|
|
|
23,509 |
|
|
|
18,693 |
|
Reduction of interest income
from non-accrual loans |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
Average balance of impaired loans |
|
|
15,359 |
|
|
|
10,230 |
|
|
|
9,331 |
|
Interest income recognized
on impaired loans |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Loans past due greater than
90 days and still accruing |
|
|
24,013 |
|
|
|
13,365 |
|
|
|
7,496 |
|
|
Management evaluates the value of the impaired loans
primarily by using the fair value of the collateral. A
summary of impaired loan information at December 31,
2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
28,759 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
Impaired loans that had allocated
specific allowance for loan losses |
|
|
22,515 |
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
Allocated allowance for loan losses |
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
(6) Mortgage Servicing Rights
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS 156 and elected the fair value
measurement method for mortgage servicing rights
(MSRs). Upon adoption, the carrying value of the
MSRs was increased to fair value by recognizing a
cumulative effect adjustment of $1.7 million pre-tax,
or $1.1 million after tax. Following is a summary of
the changes in the carrying value of MSRs, accounted
for at fair value, for the years ending December 31,
2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
5,031 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
Additions from loans sold with
servicing retained |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payoffs and paydowns |
|
|
(773 |
) |
|
|
(802 |
) |
Changes in valuation inputs
or assumptions |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
Fair value at end of year |
|
$ |
4,730 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of mortgage
loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
487,660 |
|
|
|
494,695 |
|
|
Prior to January 1, 2006, MSRs were accounted for at
the lower of their initial carrying value, net of
accumulated amortization, or fair value. MSRs were
periodically evaluated for impairment and a valuation
allowance was established through a charge to income
when the carrying value exceeded the fair value and was
believed to be temporary. Changes in the carrying value
of MSRs, accounted for using the amortization method,
for the year ended December 31, 2005 follow (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
Balance acquired in business combinations |
|
|
2,064 |
|
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained |
|
|
810 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at
end of year |
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
|
Fair value
at end of year |
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of mortgage
loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
521,520 |
|
|
There was no valuation allowance at December 31, 2005.
The Company recognizes MSR assets on residential real
estate loans sold upon the sale of the loans when it
retains the obligation to service the loans and the
servicing fee is more than adequate compensation. The recognition of MSR
assets and subsequent change in fair value are
recognized in mortgage banking revenue. MSRs are
subject to decline in value from actual and expected
prepayment of the underlying loans. The Company does
not specifically hedge the value of its MSRs.
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Fair values are provided by a third party which uses a
discounted cash flow model that incorporates the
objective characteristics of the portfolio as well as
subjective valuation parameters that purchasers of
servicing would apply to such portfolios sold into the
secondary market. The subjective factors include loan
prepayment speeds, interest rates, servicing costs and
other economic factors.
(7) Business Combinations
The Company completed one business combination in 2007.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting; thus, the results of operations
prior to the effective date of acquisition were not
included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. Goodwill and other purchase accounting
adjustments were recorded upon the completion of the
acquisition, which did not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
On November 1, 2007, the Company completed the
acquisition of 100% of the ownership interests of
Broadway Premium Funding Corporation (Broadway).
Broadway was founded in 1999 and had approximately $60
million of premium finance receivables outstanding at
the date of acquisition. Broadway provides financing
for commercial property and casualty insurance
premiums, mainly through insurance agents and brokers
in the northeastern portion of the United States and
California. Broadway is a subsidiary of FIFC.
(8) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of goodwill by business segment is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1, |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Dec 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
$ |
245,805 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,696 |
|
Premium Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
Tricom |
|
|
8,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,958 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
14,173 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
268,936 |
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,204 |
|
|
Approximately $24.9 million of the December 31, 2007
book balance of goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
The decrease in the Banking segments goodwill
primarily relates to adjustments of prior estimates of
fair values associated with the acquisition of
Hinsbrook Bank partially offset by additional
contingent consideration earned by former owners of
Guardian as a result of attaining certain performance measures.
Wintrust could pay additional consideration pursuant to
the West America and Guardian transaction through June
2009. Any payments would be reflected in the Banking
segments goodwill.
The increase in goodwill in the wealth management
segment represents additional contingent consideration
earned by the former owners of LFCM as a result of
attaining certain performance measures pursuant to the
terms of the LFCM purchase agreement. Wintrust is no
longer required to pay additional consideration
pursuant to this transaction. LFCM was merged into
WHAMC in February 2003.
A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the expected
amortization as of December 31, 2007 is follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Wealth management segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer list intangibles
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
3,252 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
(2,463 |
) |
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(10,633 |
) |
|
|
(7,108 |
) |
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
17,285 |
|
|
|
20,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
17,737 |
|
|
|
21,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
3,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The customer list intangibles recognized in connection
with the acquisitions of LFCM in 2003 and WHAMC in
2002, are being amortized over seven-year periods on an
accelerated basis. The core deposit intangibles
recognized in connection with the Companys seven bank
acquisitions in the last five years are being amortized over ten-year periods on an accelerated
basis. Total amortization expense
associated with finite-lived intangibles in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$3.9 million, $3.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
(9) Premises and Equipment, Net
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31,
2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
77,868 |
|
|
|
81,458 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
|
|
253,000 |
|
|
|
204,249 |
|
Furniture, equipment and
computer software |
|
|
82,705 |
|
|
|
71,616 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
8,003 |
|
|
|
21,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,576 |
|
|
|
378,868 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
82,279 |
|
|
|
67,827 |
|
|
|
|
Total premises and equipment, net |
|
$ |
339,297 |
|
|
|
311,041 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense related to
premises and equipment, totaled $17.1 million in 2007,
$13.5 million in 2006 and $12.1 million in 2005.
(10) Deposits
The following is a summary of deposits at December 31,
2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing accounts |
|
$ |
664,264 |
|
|
|
699,203 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,014,780 |
|
|
|
844,875 |
|
Wealth Management deposits |
|
|
599,426 |
|
|
|
529,730 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
701,972 |
|
|
|
690,938 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
297,586 |
|
|
|
304,362 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,193,413 |
|
|
|
4,800,132 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
7,471,441 |
|
|
|
7,869,240 |
|
|
The scheduled maturities of time certificates of
deposit at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Due in one year |
|
$ |
3,464,962 |
|
|
|
3,704,507 |
|
Due in one to two years |
|
|
386,937 |
|
|
|
643,252 |
|
Due in two to three years |
|
|
132,794 |
|
|
|
185,803 |
|
Due in three to four years |
|
|
141,148 |
|
|
|
106,111 |
|
Due in four to five years |
|
|
67,276 |
|
|
|
157,783 |
|
Due after five years |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
|
Total time certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
4,193,413 |
|
|
|
4,800,132 |
|
|
The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities
of time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more
at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Maturing within 3 months |
|
$ |
708,559 |
|
|
|
613,214 |
|
After 3 but within 6 months |
|
|
493,223 |
|
|
|
560,578 |
|
After 6 but within 12 months |
|
|
645,061 |
|
|
|
794,749 |
|
After 12 months |
|
|
482,818 |
|
|
|
669,957 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,329,661 |
|
|
|
2,638,498 |
|
|
|
|
(11) Notes Payable
The notes payable balance was $60.7 million and $12.8
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
These balances represent the outstanding balances on a
$101.0 million loan agreement (Agreement) with an
unaffiliated bank. The Agreement consists of a $100.0
million revolving note, which matures on June 1, 2008
and a $1.0 million note that matures on June 1, 2015.
At December 31, 2007, the notes payable balance
includes the $1.0 million note and a $59.7 million
outstanding balance on the $100.0 million revolving
note. Effective January 1, 2007, interest is
calculated, at the Companys option, at a floating rate
equal to either: (1) LIBOR plus 115 basis points or
(2) the greater of the lenders prime rate or the
Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. At December
31, 2007 and 2006, the interest rates were 6.27% and
6.77%, respectively.
The Agreement is secured by the stock of some of the
Banks and contains several restrictive covenants,
including the maintenance of various capital adequacy
levels, asset quality and profitability ratios, and
certain restrictions on dividends and other
indebtedness. At December 31, 2007, the Company is in
compliance with all debt covenants. The Agreement may
be utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund
continued growth at the Companys Banks and to serve as
an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common
stock repurchases or other general corporate purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
(12) Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
A summary of the outstanding FHLB advances at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2.77% advance due February 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
4.89% advance due November 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
Variable-rate advance due January 2008 |
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.37% advance due February 2008 |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
3.32% advance due March 2008 |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
4.36% advance due March 2008 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2.72% advance due May 2008 |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
4.78% advance due October 2008 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
4.40% advance due July 2009 |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
4.85% advance due November 2009 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
4.58% advance due March 2010 |
|
|
5,018 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
4.61% advance due March 2010 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
4.50% advance due September 2010 |
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
4.88% advance due November 2010 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
4.60% advance due July 2011 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
3.30% advance due November 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
4.61% advance due January 2012 |
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.68% advance due January 2012 |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.44% advance due April 2012 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.78% advance due June 2012 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.79% advance due June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
3.99% advance due September 2012 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.78% advance due February 2015 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
4.12% advance due February 2015 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
3.70% advance due June 2015 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
4.55% advance due February 2016 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
4.83% advance due May 2016 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
3.47% advance due November 2017 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.18% advance due February 2022 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
$ |
415,183 |
|
|
|
325,531 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007 all but one of the FHLB advances
were fixed-rate term obligations. The Company entered
into a $3.7 million, 30-day variable-rate advance in
December 2007. The rate on the variable advance
adjusts daily and was 3.77% at December 31, 2007. All
of the advances due after 2011 have varying call dates
ranging from January 2008 to February 2011. FHLB
advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted
for unamortized fair value adjustments recorded in
connection with advances acquired through acquisitions.
At December 31, 2007, the weighted average contractual
interest rate on FHLB advances was 4.31%, which is also
the same as the weighted average effective interest
rate, which reflects amortization of fair value
adjustments associated with FHLB advances acquired
through acquisitions.
FHLB advances are collateralized by qualifying residential real estate loans and certain securities.
The Banks have arrangements with the FHLB whereby, based on available collateral, they could have borrowed an additional $85.2 million at
December 31, 2007.
(13) Subordinated Notes
A summary of the subordinated notes at December 31,
2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Subordinated note, due October 29, 2012 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Subordinated note, due May 1, 2013 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Subordinated note, due May 29, 2015 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total subordinated notes |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
The subordinated notes were issued in 2002, 2003 and
2005. Each subordinated note has a term of ten years
and may be redeemed by the Company at any time prior to
maturity. The subordinated note issued in 2005 was
signed by the Company on October 25, 2005, but was not
funded until May 2006. The proceeds from the issuance
were used to fund the acquisition of Hinsbrook Bank. Each note
requires annual principal payments of $5.0 million
beginning in the sixth year of the note. The interest
rate on each subordinated note is calculated at a rate
equal to LIBOR plus 1.30%. In 2006, the interest rate
on each subordinated note was calculated at a rate
equal to LIBOR plus 1.60%. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, the weighted average contractual interest rate on
the subordinated notes was 6.38% and 6.97%,
respectively. In connection with the issuances of the
subordinated notes in 2002 and 2003, the Company
incurred costs totaling $1.0 million. These costs are
included in other assets and are being amortized to
interest expense using a method that approximates the
effective interest method. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, the unamortized balance of these costs were
$380,000 and $508,000, respectively. No issuance costs
were incurred in connection with the subordinated note
issued in 2005. The subordinated notes qualify as Tier
II capital under the regulatory capital requirements.
(14) Other Borrowings
The following is a summary of other borrowings at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
$ |
4,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
248,334 |
|
|
|
159,883 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
$ |
254,434 |
|
|
|
162,072 |
|
|
At
December 31, 2007 securities sold under repurchase agreements represent
$165.5 million of customer sweep accounts in connection
with master repurchase agreements at the Banks as well
as $82.8 million of short-term borrowings from banks
and brokers. Securities
pledged for these borrowings are maintained under the
Companys control and consist of U.S. Government
agency, mortgage-backed and corporate securities.
These securities are included in the available-for-sale
securities portfolio as reflected on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Condition.
Other includes a 6.17% fixed-rate mortgage (which
matures May 1, 2010) related to the Companys
Northfield banking office.
(15) Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of December 31, 2007 the Company owned 100% of the
Common Securities of nine trusts, Wintrust Capital
Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust
Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust VII,
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust Capital Trust IX,
Northview Capital Trust I, Town Bankshares Capital
Trust I and First Northwest Capital Trust I (the
Trusts) set up to provide long-term financing. The
Northview, Town and First Northwest capital trusts were
acquired as part of the acquisitions of Northview
Financial Corporation, Town Bank-shares, Ltd. and First
Northwest Bancorp, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were
formed for purposes of issuing Trust Preferred
Securities to third-party investors and investing the
proceeds from the issuances of the Trust Preferred
Securities and the Common Securities solely in Junior
Subordinated Debentures (Debentures) issued by the
Company, with the same maturities and interest rates as
the Trust Preferred Securities. The Debentures are the
sole assets of the Trusts. In each Trust the Common
Securities represent approximately 3% of the Debentures
and the Trust Preferred Securities represent
approximately 97% of the Debentures.
The Trusts are reported in the Companys financial
statements as unconsolidated subsidiaries; the
Debentures are reflected as Junior subordinated
debentures and the Common Securities are included in
Available-for-sale Securities.
A summary of the Companys junior subordinated
debentures, which represents the par value of the
obligations and basis adjustments for the unamortized
fair value adjustments recognized at the acquisition dates for the
Northview, Town and First Northwest obligations at December 31, 2007 and 2006, is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 3.25%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Capital Trust III,
due April 7, 2033 |
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
25,774 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 2.80%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV,
due December 8, 2033 |
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
20,619 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 2.60%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Statutory Trust V,
due May 11, 2034 |
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 1.95%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Capital Trust VII,
due March 15, 2035 |
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 1.45%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII
due September 30, 2035 |
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
Fixed rate (6.84%)
Debentures owed to
Wintrust Capital Trust IX,
due September 15, 2036 |
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
Fixed rate (6.35%)
Debentures owed to
Northview Capital Trust I,
due November 8, 2033 |
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
6,279 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 3.00%)
Debentures owed to
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I,
due November 8, 2033 |
|
|
6,239 |
|
|
|
6,301 |
|
Variable rate (LIBOR + 3.00%)
Debentures owed to
First Northwest Capital Trust I,
due May 31, 2034 |
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
Total junior subordinated debentures |
|
$ |
249,662 |
|
|
|
249,828 |
|
|
The interest rates associated with the variable rate
Debentures are based on the three-month LIBOR rate and
were 8.49%, 7.63%, 7.43%, 6.94%, 6.28%, 7.91%, and
7.83%, for Wintrust Capital Trust III, Wintrust
Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V,
Wintrust Capital Trust VII, Wintrust Capital Trust
VIII, Town Bankshares Capital Trust I and First
Northwest Capital Trust I, respectively, at December
31, 2007. The interest rate on the Debentures of
Wintrust Capital Trust IX, currently fixed at 6.84%,
changes to a variable rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus
1.63% effective September 15, 2011, and the interest
rate on
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
the
Debentures of Northview Capital Trust I, fixed at 6.35% at December
31, 2007, changed to a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 3.00% effective February 8,
2008. At December 31, 2007, the weighted average
contractual interest rate on the Debentures was 7.14%.
In August 2006, the Company entered into $175 million
of interest rate swaps, which are designated in hedge
relationships, to hedge the variable cash flows of
certain Debentures. On a hedge-adjusted basis, the
weighted average interest rate on the Debentures was
7.38% at December 31, 2007. Distributions on the
common and preferred securities issued by the Trusts are
payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the
interest rate being earned by the Trusts on the
Debentures held by the Trusts. Interest expense on the
Debentures is deductible for income
tax purposes.
On September 1, 2006, the Company issued $51.5 million
of Debentures to Wintrust Capital Trust IX with an
initial fixed rate of 6.84%, and on September 5, 2006,
the Company used proceeds from this issuance to redeem,
at par value, $32.0 million of the Debentures of
Wintrust Capital Trust I with a fixed interest rate of
9.00%. In connection with the redemption of the
Debentures of Wintrust Capital Trust I, the Company
expensed $304,000 of unamortized issuance costs.
The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions
and payments upon liquidation or redemption of the trust preferred securities
in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The Company and
the Trusts believe that, taken together, the
obligations of the Company under the guarantees, the
Debentures, and other related agreements provide, in
the aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional
guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the
obligations of the Trusts under the trust preferred securities. Subject to certain limitations, the
Company has the right to defer payment of interest on
the Debentures at any time, or from time to time, for a
period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The
trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory
redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the
Debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption.
The Debentures are redeemable in whole or in part prior
to maturity, at the discretion of the Company if
certain conditions are met, and only after the Company
has obtained Federal Reserve approval, if then required
under applicable guidelines or regulations. The
Debentures held by the Trusts are first redeemable, in
whole or in part, by the Company as follows:
|
|
|
|
Wintrust Capital Trust III
|
|
April 7, 2008 |
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
Wintrust Statutory Trust V
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
Wintrust Capital Trust VII
|
|
March 15, 2010 |
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
Wintrust Capital Trust IX
|
|
September 15, 2011 |
Northview Capital Trust I
|
|
August 8, 2008 |
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I
|
|
August 8, 2008 |
First Northwest Capital Trust I
|
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
The junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain
limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company
for regulatory purposes. On February 28, 2005, the
Federal Reserve issued a final rule that retains Tier I
capital treatment for these instruments but
with stricter limits. Under the rule, which is
effective March 31, 2009, and has a transition period
until then, the aggregate amount of junior subordinated
debentures and certain other capital elements is
limited to 25% of Tier I capital elements (including
junior subordinated debentures), net of goodwill less any
associated deferred tax liability. The amount of
junior subordinated debentures and certain other
capital elements in excess of the limit could be
included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions.
Applying the final rule at December 31, 2007, the
Company would still be considered well-capitalized
under regulatory capital guidelines.
(16) Minimum Lease Commitments
The Company occupies certain facilities under operating
lease agreements. Gross rental expense related to the
Companys operating leases was $5.9 million in 2007,
$5.8 million in 2006 and $5.0 million in 2005. The
Company also leases certain owned premises and receives
rental income from such agreements. Gross rental
income related to the Companys buildings totaled $1.9
million, $1.6 million and $1.8 million, in 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Future minimum gross rental
payments for office space and future minimum gross
rental income as of December 31, 2007 for all
noncancelable leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future |
|
Future |
|
|
minimum |
|
minimum |
|
|
gross |
|
gross |
|
|
rental |
|
rental |
|
|
payments |
|
income |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
3,059 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
2009 |
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
16,777 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future amounts |
|
$ |
31,595 |
|
|
|
6,142 |
|
|
(17) Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Current income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
28,982 |
|
|
|
34,667 |
|
|
|
33,399 |
|
State |
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
|
Total current income taxes |
|
|
33,008 |
|
|
|
38,955 |
|
|
|
37,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(3,974 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
603 |
|
State |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,837 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
28,171 |
|
|
|
37,748 |
|
|
|
37,934 |
|
|
Included in total income tax expense is income tax
expense applicable to net gains on available-for-sale
securities of $1.1 million in 2007, $6,000 in 2006 and
$405,000 in 2005.
The exercise of certain stock options and the vesting
and issuance of restricted shares produced tax benefits
of $2.0 million in 2007, $5.3 million in 2006 and $7.0
million in 2005 which were recorded directly to
shareholders equity.
A reconciliation of the differences between taxes
computed using the statutory Federal income tax rate of
35% and actual income tax expense is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Income tax expense based
upon the Federal statutory rate
on income before income taxes |
|
$ |
29,338 |
|
|
|
36,484 |
|
|
|
36,733 |
|
Increase (decrease) in tax
resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt interest, net of
interest expense disallowance |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
(800 |
) |
State taxes, net of
federal tax benefit |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
Income earned on bank owned
life insurance |
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(679 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
28,171 |
|
|
|
37,748 |
|
|
|
37,934 |
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise
to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
19,291 |
|
|
|
17,135 |
|
Net unrealized losses on
securities (SFAS 115) |
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
10,192 |
|
Net unrealized losses on
derivatives (SFAS 133) |
|
|
3,492 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Federal net operating loss
carryforward |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
42,800 |
|
|
|
41,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
11,767 |
|
Deferred loan fees and costs |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
Capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
11,404 |
|
FHLB stock dividends |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
Deferred gain on termination
of derivatives |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
Other |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
32,254 |
|
|
|
33,158 |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
10,546 |
|
|
|
8,352 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007, Wintrust had Federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $2.0 million which are
available to offset future taxable income. These net
operating losses expire in 2009 and 2010 and are
subject to certain statutory limitations.
Management believes that it is more likely than not
that the recorded deferred tax assets will be fully
realized and therefore no valuation allowance is
necessary. The conclusion that it is more likely than
not that the deferred tax assets will be realized is
based on the Companys historical earnings trend, its
current level of earnings and prospects for continued
growth and profitability.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January
1, 2007. FIN 48 requires companies to record a
liability (or a reduction of an asset) for the
uncertainty associated with certain tax positions.
This liability is referred to as an Unrecognized Tax
Benefit as it reflects the fact that the Company has
not recognized the benefit associated with the tax
position. Wintrust evaluated its tax positions at
December 31, 2006 and throughout 2007, in accordance
with FIN 48. Based on this evaluation, the Company
determined that it does not have any tax positions for
which unrecognized tax benefits must be recorded. In
addition, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the
Company has no
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
interest or penalties relating to income tax positions
recognized in the income statement or in the balance
sheet.
Tax years that remain open and subject to audit by
major tax jurisdictions include the Companys 2004
2007 Federal income tax returns and its 2004 2007
Illinois income tax returns.
(18) Employee Benefit and Stock Plans
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan), which
was approved by the Companys shareholders in January
2007, permits the grant of incentive stock options,
nonqualified stock options, rights and restricted
stock, as well as the conversion of outstanding options
of acquired companies to Wintrust options. The 2007
Plans provide for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares
of common stock. All grants made in 2007 were made
pursuant to the 2007 Plan and as of December 31, 2007,
274,337 shares were available for future grant. The
2007 Plan replaced the Wintrust Financial Corporation
1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan) which had
substantially similar terms. The 2007 Plan and the
1997 Plan are collectively referred to as the Plans.
The Plans cover substantially all employees of
Wintrust.
The Company typically awards stock-based compensation
in the form of stock options and restricted share
awards. In general, the Plans provide for the grant of
options to purchase shares of Wintrusts common stock
at the fair market value of the stock on the date the
options are granted. Options generally vest ratably
over a five-year period and expire at such time as the
Compensation Committee determines at the time of grant.
The 2007 Plan provides for a maximum term of seven
years from the date of grant for stock options while
the 1997 Plan provided for a maximum term of ten years.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards (restricted shares)
entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of
the Companys common stock. Restricted shares
generally vest over periods of one to five years from
the date of grant. Holders of the restricted shares
are not entitled to vote or receive cash dividends (or
cash payments equal to the cash dividends) on the
underlying common shares until the awards are vested.
Except in limited circumstances, these awards are canceled upon termination of employment without any
payment of consideration by the Company.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Income was $10.8 million,
$12.2 million and $4.4 million and the related tax
benefits were $4.1 million, $4.6 million and $1.7
million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Compensation expense
recognized in 2007 and 2006 was due to stock options
and restricted share awards recorded under SFAS 123R
and recognized ratably over the vesting period.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in 2005 was
due primarily to restricted share awards recorded under
APB 25 at intrinsic value and recognized ratably over
the vesting period.
Compensation cost is measured as the fair value of an
award on the date of grant. The Company estimates the
fair value of stock options at the date of grant using
a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that utilizes the
assumptions outlined in the following table. These
assumptions are consistent with the provisions of SFAS
123R and the Companys prior period pro forma
disclosures of net income and earnings per share,
including stock option expense. Option-pricing models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions and
are sensitive to changes in the options expected life
and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which
can materially affect the fair value estimate. Expected
life is based on historical exercise and termination
behavior as well as the term of the option, and
expected stock price volatility is based on historical
volatility of the Companys common stock, which
correlates with the expected life of the options. The
risk-free interest rate is based on comparable U.S.
Treasury rates. Management reviews and adjusts the
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of an
option on a periodic basis to better reflect expected
trends. The following assumptions were used to
determine the fair value of options granted in the
years ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
A summary of the Plans stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Common |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Value(2) |
|
|
Shares |
|
Strike Prices |
|
Term(1) |
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2005 |
|
|
3,047,278 |
|
|
$ |
23.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of options of acquired companies |
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
13.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
488,850 |
|
|
|
53.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(465,348 |
) |
|
|
13.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(57,163 |
) |
|
|
39.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,019,482 |
|
|
$ |
29.63 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
76,744 |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,762,985 |
|
|
$ |
19.89 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
61,845 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
3,019,482 |
|
|
$ |
29.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of options of acquired companies |
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
24.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
221,600 |
|
|
|
51.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(400,874 |
) |
|
|
15.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(56,190 |
) |
|
|
44.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,786,064 |
|
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
47,228 |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,774,699 |
|
|
$ |
24.71 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
43,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
2,786,064 |
|
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
37.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(298,579 |
) |
|
|
14.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(108,304 |
) |
|
|
47.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,505,181 |
|
|
$ |
34.76 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
17,558 |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,822,830 |
|
|
$ |
29.42 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
17,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007 |
|
2,475,180 |
|
|
$ |
34.58 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
17,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the weighted average contractual remaining life in years. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax intrinsic value (i.e., the difference
between the Companys average of the high and low stock price at year end and the option exercise
price, multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders if
they had exercised their options on the last day of the year.
Options with exercise prices above the year end stock price are excluded from the calculation
of intrinsic value. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Companys
stock. |
The weighted average per share grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $12.83, $19.41 and $20.09, respectively. The aggregate
intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, was
$7.3 million, $14.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively.
Cash received from option exercises under the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 was $4.4 million, $6.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized
for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $2.4 million, $5.4 million and $6.8 million
for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
A summary of the Plans restricted share award activity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
Restricted Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
335,904 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
|
|
206,157 |
|
|
$ |
53.55 |
|
|
|
25,512 |
|
|
$ |
40.68 |
|
Granted |
|
|
99,663 |
|
|
|
39.51 |
|
|
|
207,343 |
|
|
|
50.63 |
|
|
|
200,902 |
|
|
|
53.97 |
|
Vested (shares issued) |
|
|
(112,880 |
) |
|
|
51.35 |
|
|
|
(73,694 |
) |
|
|
53.48 |
|
|
|
(19,068 |
) |
|
|
40.65 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,060 |
) |
|
|
47.51 |
|
|
|
(3,902 |
) |
|
|
51.87 |
|
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
54.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
308,627 |
|
|
$ |
48.16 |
|
|
|
335,904 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
|
|
206,157 |
|
|
$ |
53.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The fair value of restricted shares is determined based
on the average of the high and low trading prices on
the grant date.
The actual tax benefit realized upon the vesting of
restricted shares is based on the fair value of the
shares on the vesting date and the estimated tax
benefit of the awards is based on fair value of the
awards on the grant date. The actual tax benefit
realized upon the vesting of restricted shares in 2007
and 2006 was $359,000 and $62,000, respectively, less
than the estimated tax benefit for those shares. In
2005, the actual tax benefit realized upon the vesting
of restricted shares was $123,000 more than the
estimated tax benefit of those awards. These
differences in actual and estimated tax benefits were
recorded directly to shareholders equity.
As of December 31, 2007, there was $18.8 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share based arrangements under the Plan.
That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of approximately two years. The total
fair value of shares vested during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $11.5 million,
$9.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
Other Employee Benefits
Wintrust and its subsidiaries also provide 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plans (401(k) Plans). The 401(k)
Plans cover all employees meeting certain eligibility
requirements. Contributions by employees are made
through salary deductions at their direction, subject
to certain Plan and statutory limitations. Employer
contributions to the 401(k) Plans are made at the
employers discretion. Generally, participants
completing 501 hours of service are eligible to share
in an allocation of employer contributions. The
Companys expense for the employer contributions to the
401(k) Plans was approximately $2.8 million in 2007,
$2.5 million in 2006, and $2.4 million in 2005.
The Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (SPP) is designed to encourage greater
stock ownership among employees, thereby enhancing
employee commitment to the Company. The SPP gives
eligible employees the right to accumulate funds over
an offering period to purchase shares of common stock.
The Company has reserved 375,000 shares of its
authorized common stock for the SPP. All shares offered
under the SPP will be either newly issued shares of the
Company or shares issued from treasury, if any. In
accordance with the SPP, the purchase price of the
shares of common stock
may not be lower than the lesser of 85% of the fair
market value per share of the Common Stock on the first
day of the offering period or 85% of the fair market
value per share of the common stock on the last date
for the offering period. The Companys Board of
Directors authorized a purchase price calculation at
90% of fair market value for each of the offering
periods. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, a total of 38,717
shares, 36,737 shares and
35,173 shares, respectively, were issued to participant
accounts and approximately $170,000, $284,000 and
$274,000, respectively, was recognized as compensation
expense. The current offering period concludes on March
31, 2008. The Company plans to continue to periodically
offer common stock through this SPP subsequent to March
31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, 127,651 shares were available for future
grants under the SPP.
The Company does not currently offer other
postretirement benefits such as health care or other
pension plans.
The Wintrust Financial Corporation Directors Deferred
Fee and Stock Plan (DDFS Plan) allows directors of
the Company and its subsidiaries to choose to receive
payment of directors fees in either cash or common
stock of the Company and to defer the receipt of the
fees. The DDFS Plan is designed to encourage stock
ownership by directors. The Company has reserved
225,000 shares of its authorized common stock for the
DDFS Plan. All shares offered under the DDFS Plan will
be either newly issued shares of the Company or shares
issued from treasury. The number of shares issued is
determined on a quarterly basis based on the fees
earned during the quarter and the fair market value per
share of the common stock on the last trading day of
the preceding quarter. The shares are issued annually
and the directors are entitled to dividends and voting
rights upon the issuance of the shares. During 2007,
2006 and 2005, a total of 15,843 shares, 12,916 shares
and 7,530 shares, respectively, were issued to
directors. For those directors that elect to defer the
receipt of the common stock, the Company maintains
records of stock units representing an obligation to
issue shares of common stock. The number of stock units
equals the number of shares that would have been issued
had the director not elected to defer receipt of the
shares. Additional stock units are credited at the time
dividends are paid, however no voting rights are
associated with the stock units. The shares of common
stock represented by the stock units are issued in the
year specified by the directors in their participation
agreements. At December 31, 2007, the Company has an obligation to
issue 135,890 shares of common stock to directors that elected to
defer the receipt of stock and has 38,894 shares available for
future grants under the DDFS Plan.
(19) Regulatory Matters
Banking laws place restrictions upon the amount of
dividends which can be paid to Wintrust by the Banks.
Based on these laws, the Banks could, subject to
minimum capital requirements, declare dividends to
Wintrust without
obtaining regulatory approval in an amount not
exceeding (a) undivided profits, and (b) the amount of
net income reduced by dividends paid for the current
and prior two years. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, cash
dividends totaling $105.9 million, $183.6 million and
$45.1 million, respectively, were paid to Wintrust by
the Banks. As of January 1, 2008, the Banks had
approximately $28.5 million available to be paid as
dividends to Wintrust without prior regulatory
approval; however, only $17.0 million was available as
dividends from the Banks without reducing their capital
below the well-capitalized level.
The Banks are also required by the Federal Reserve Act
to maintain reserves against deposits. Reserves are
held either in the form of vault cash or balances
maintained with the Federal Reserve Bank and are based
on the average daily deposit balances and statutory
reserve ratios prescribed by the type of deposit
account. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, reserve
balances of approximately $22.3 million and $17.2
million, respectively, were required to be maintained
at the Federal Reserve Bank.
The Company and the Banks are subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Companys financial statements.
Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and
the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that
involve quantitative measures of the Companys assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balancesheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Companys and the Banks capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to
ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the
Banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total
and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to
risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier 1 leverage
capital (as defined) to average quarterly assets (as
defined).
The Federal Reserves capital guidelines require bank
holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of
qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of
8.0%, of which at least 4.0% must
be in the form of Tier 1 Capital. The Federal Reserve
also requires a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1
Capital to total assets) of 3.0% for strong bank
holding companies
(those rated a composite 1 under the Federal
Reserves rating system). For all other banking holding
companies, the minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio is 4.0%.
In addition the Federal Reserve continues to consider
the Tier 1 leverage ratio in evaluating proposals for
expansion or new activities. As reflected in the
following table, the Company met all minimum capital
requirements at December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
In 2002, Wintrust became designated as a financial
holding company. Bank holding companies approved as
financial holding companies may engage in an expanded
range of activities, including the businesses conducted
by the Wayne Hummer Companies. As a financial holding
company, Wintrusts Banks are required to maintain
their capital positions at the well-capitalized
level. As of December 31, 2007, the Banks were
categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. The ratios
required for the Banks to be well capitalized by
regulatory definition are 10.0%, 6.0%, and 5.0% for
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets, Tier 1 Capital
to Risk-Weighted Assets and Tier 1 Leverage Ratio,
respectively. There are no conditions or events since
the most recent notification that management believes
would materially affect the Banks regulatory capital
categories.
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The Banks actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented in the
following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized by |
|
|
Actual |
|
Regulatory Definition |
|
Actual |
|
Regulatory Definition |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Forest Bank |
|
$ |
139,274 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
$ |
135,922 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
150,690 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
130,757 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Hinsdale Bank |
|
|
119,436 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
111,440 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
126,216 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
117,827 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
North Shore Bank |
|
|
82,878 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
75,059 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
77,896 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
75,622 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Libertyville Bank |
|
|
89,840 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
84,813 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
82,297 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
78,836 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Barrington Bank |
|
|
77,828 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
71,232 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
72,063 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
70,078 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
49,745 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
46,396 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
49,644 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
47,028 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Northbrook Bank |
|
|
59,639 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
54,396 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
56,788 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
54,663 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Advantage Bank |
|
|
25,073 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
22,175 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
21,262 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Village Bank |
|
|
46,461 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
43,380 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
43,574 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
42,091 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Beverly Bank |
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
15,713 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11,955 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Town Bank |
|
|
49,688 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
48,720 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
40,021 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
37,719 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Wheaton Bank |
|
|
26,243 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
23,721 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
24,677 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
23,244 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
State Bank of The Lakes |
|
|
48,028 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
43,774 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
47,020 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
38,285 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Old Plank Trail Bank |
|
|
18,730 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
16,917 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
19,127 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
7,564 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
St. Charles Bank |
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
9,866 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
11,272 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Forest Bank |
|
$ |
131,061 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
81,553 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
143,081 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
$ |
78,454 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Hinsdale Bank |
|
|
111,298 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
66,864 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
117,802 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
70,696 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
North Shore Bank |
|
|
78,321 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
45,035 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
73,751 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
45,373 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Libertyville Bank |
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
50,888 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
77,079 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
47,301 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Barrington Bank |
|
|
73,786 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
42,739 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
68,117 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
42,047 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
47,032 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
27,837 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
47,210 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
28,217 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Northbrook Bank |
|
|
56,278 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
32,638 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
53,595 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
32,798 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Advantage Bank |
|
|
23,783 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
14,980 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
20,853 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
12,757 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Village Bank |
|
|
43,896 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
26,028 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
41,012 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
25,254 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Beverly Bank |
|
|
14,629 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Town Bank |
|
|
46,707 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
29,232 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
37,790 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
22,631 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Wheaton Bank |
|
|
24,674 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
23,395 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
13,934 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
State Bank of The Lakes |
|
|
45,425 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
44,288 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
22,971 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Old Plank Trail Bank |
|
|
17,804 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
18,634 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
St. Charles Bank |
|
|
10,574 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
11,066 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Forest Bank |
|
$ |
131,061 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
$ |
78,488 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
$ |
143,081 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
$ |
73,518 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Hinsdale Bank |
|
|
111,298 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
60,357 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
117,802 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
60,193 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
North Shore Bank |
|
|
78,321 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
46,843 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
73,751 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
48,437 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Libertyville Bank |
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
49,219 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
77,079 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
45,897 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Barrington Bank |
|
|
73,786 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
39,672 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
68,117 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
42,323 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Crystal Lake Bank |
|
|
47,032 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
27,934 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
47,210 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
27,988 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Northbrook Bank |
|
|
56,278 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
33,218 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
53,595 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
35,939 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Advantage Bank |
|
|
23,783 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
15,649 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
20,853 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
13,477 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Village Bank |
|
|
43,896 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
27,338 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
41,012 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
29,601 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Beverly Bank |
|
|
14,629 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8,406 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
8,105 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Town Bank |
|
|
46,707 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
37,790 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
22,127 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Wheaton Bank |
|
|
24,674 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
14,932 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
23,395 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
State Bank of The Lakes |
|
|
45,425 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
26,698 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
44,288 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
25,622 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Old Plank Trail Bank |
|
|
17,804 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
18,634 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
St. Charles Bank |
|
|
10,574 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
2.405 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Wintrusts mortgage banking and broker/dealer subsidiaries are also required to maintain minimum
net worth capital requirements with various governmental agencies. The mortgage banking
subsidiarys net worth requirements are governed by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development and the broker/dealers net worth requirements are governed by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission. As of December 31, 2007, these subsidiaries met their minimum
net worth capital requirements.
(20) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has outstanding, at any time, a number of
commitments to extend credit. These commitments include
revolving home equity line and other credit agreements,
term loan commitments and standby and commercial
letters of credit. Standby and commercial letters of
credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee
the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby
letters of credit are contingent upon the failure of
the customer to perform according to the terms of the
underlying contract with the third party, while
commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to
facilitate commerce and typically result in the
commitment being drawn on when the underlying
transaction is consummated between the customer and the
third party.
These commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements
of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the
amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Condition. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. The Company uses the same credit
policies in making commitments as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments. Commitments to extend
commercial, commercial real estate and construction
loans totaled $1.9 billion and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and unused home equity and credit card lines
totaled $890.2 million and $865.1 million,
respectively. Standby and commercial letters of credit
totaled $187.1 million at December 31, 2007 and $175.3
million at December 31, 2006.
In addition, at December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company
had approximately $113.6 million and $117.8 million,
respectively, in commitments to fund residential
mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market.
These lending commitments are also considered
derivative instruments under the guidelines of SFAS
133. The Company also enters into forward contracts for
the future delivery of residential mortgage loans at
specified interest rates to reduce the interest rate
risk associated with commitments to fund loans as well
as mortgage loans held-for-sale. These forward
contracts are also considered derivative instruments
under SFAS 133 and had contractual amounts of
approximately $218.9 million at December 31, 2007 and
$262.7 million at December 31, 2006. See Note 21 for
further discussion on derivative instruments.
The Company enters into residential mortgage loan sale
agreements with investors in the normal course of
business. These agreements usually require certain
representations concerning credit information, loan
documentation, collateral and insurability. On
occasion, investors have requested the Company to
indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to
repurchase loans which the investors believe do not
comply with applicable representations. Management
maintains a liability for estimated losses on loans
expected to be repurchased or on which indemnification
is expected to be provided and regularly evaluates the
adequacy of this recourse liability based on trends in
repurchase and indemnification requests, actual loss
experience, known and inherent risks in the loans, and
current economic conditions.
The Company sold approximately $1.9 billion of mortgage
loans in 2007 and in 2006. During 2007, the Company
provided approximately $4.9
million for estimated losses related to recourse
obligations on residential mortgage loans sold to
investors. These estimated losses primarily related to
mortgages obtained through wholesale channels which
experienced early payment defaults. Repurchase or
indemnification requests for early payment defaults are
typically received within 90-120 days subsequent to
sale. The Company substantially modified its product
offerings in the second quarter of 2007 in an effort to
reduce the risk associated with these contingencies.
Losses charged against the liability for estimated
losses were $3.3 million and $395,000 for 2007 and
2006, respectively. The liability for estimated losses
on repurchase and
indemnification was $1.9 million and $322,000 at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and was
included in other liabilities on the balance sheet.
In connection with the sale of premium finance
receivables, the Company continues to service the
receivables and maintains a recourse obligation to the
purchasers should the underlying borrowers default on
their obligations. The estimated recourse obligation is
taken into account in recording the sale, effectively
reducing the gain recognized. The Company did not sell
any premium finance receivables to unrelated third
parties from the third quarter of 2006 to the third
quarter of 2007. As a result, all outstanding premium
finance receivables sold and serviced for others were
paid-off in the second quarter of 2007. Sales resumed
in the fourth quarter of 2007 and therefore, the
Company established a new recourse obligation for this
most recent sale. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
outstanding premium finance receivables sold to and
serviced for third parties for which the Company has a
recourse obligation were $219.9 million and $58.3
million, respectively. Losses charged against the
recourse obligation were $129,000, $191,000 and
$269,000 for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the recorded recourse
obligation related to these loans was $179,000 and
$129,000, respectively.
The Company utilizes an out-sourced securities clearing
platform and has agreed to indemnify the clearing
broker of WHI for losses that it may sustain from the
customer accounts introduced by WHI. At December, 31,
2007, the total amount of customer balances maintained
by the clearing broker and subject to indemnification
was approximately $24 million. WHI seeks to control the
risks associated with its customers activities by
requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in
compliance with various regulatory and internal
guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
In the ordinary course of business, there are legal
proceedings pending against the Company and its
subsidiaries. Management believes the aggregate
liabilities, if any, resulting from such actions would
not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position of the Company.
(21) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into derivative financial
instruments as part of its strategy to manage its
exposure to adverse changes in interest rates.
Derivative instruments represent contracts between
parties that result in one party delivering cash to the
other party based on a notional amount and an
underlying (such as a rate, security price or price
index) as specified in the contract. The amount of cash
delivered from one party to the other is determined
based on the interaction of the notional amount of the
contract with the underlying. Derivatives are also
implicit in certain contracts and commitments.
Managements objective in using derivative financial
instruments is to protect against the risk of interest
rate movements on the value of certain assets and
liabilities and on future cash flows. Derivative
instruments that have been used by the Company include
interest rate caps and interest rate swaps with indices
that relate to the pricing of specific assets or
liabilities and covered call options that relate to
specific investment securities. In addition, interest
rate lock commitments provided to customers for the
origination of mortgage loans that will be sold into
the secondary market as well as forward agreements the
Company enters into to sell such loans to protect
itself against adverse changes in interest rates are
deemed to be derivative instruments.
In accordance with SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company
recognizes derivative financial instruments
at fair value on the Consolidated Statement of
Condition, regardless of the purpose or intent for
holding the instrument. Derivatives are included in
other assets
or other liabilities, as appropriate. Changes in the
fair value of derivative financial instruments are
either recognized in income or in shareholders equity
as a component of comprehensive income depending on
whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies
for hedge accounting and, if so, whether it qualifies
as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Generally,
changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as
fair value hedges are recorded in income in the same
period and in the same income statement line as the
changes in the fair values of the hedged items that
relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of
derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the
extent they are effective hedges, are recorded as a
component of comprehensive income, net of deferred
taxes, and reclassified to earnings when the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Changes in fair values of
derivatives not qualifying as hedges, including changes
in fair values related to the ineffective portion of
cash flow hedges, are reported in non-interest income
during the period of the change. Derivative financial
instruments are valued by a third party and are
periodically validated by comparison with valuations
provided by the respective counterparties.
Derivative instruments have inherent risks, primarily
market risk and credit risk. Market risk is associated
with changes in interest rates. Credit risk relates to
the risk that the counterparty will fail to perform
according to the terms of the agreement. The amounts
potentially subject to market and credit risks are the
streams of interest payments under the contracts and
the market value of the derivative instrument which is
determined based on the interaction of the notional
amount of the contract with the underlying, and not the
notional principal amounts used to express the volume
of the transactions. Management monitors the market
risk and credit risk associated with derivative
financial instruments as part of its overall
Asset/Liability management process. The Company does
not enter into derivatives for purely speculative
purposes.
The table below summarizes the Companys interest rate swaps at December 31, 2007 and 2006 that
were entered into to hedge certain interest-bearing liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
Maturity Date (Call Option Date) |
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value |
|
Receive |
|
Pay |
|
Type of Hedging |
|
|
Amount |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
Relationship |
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive
variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2011 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
(9,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive
variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2011 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31,
2007 as reflected in the above table, were designated
as cash flow hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. The
unrealized losses of $9.1 million and $2.4 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are included
in other liabilities. These hedges were considered
highly effective during 2007 and 2006 and none of the
change in fair value of these derivatives was
attributed to hedge ineffectiveness. The changes in
fair value, net of tax, are separately disclosed in the
statement of changes in shareholders equity as a
component of comprehensive income. During 2008, the
Company estimates that $2.1 million of unrealized
losses will be reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income to interest expense.
At December 31, 2005 the Company had $231.1 million of
interest rate swaps outstanding that were not
documented as being in hedging relationships pursuant
to the requirements of SFAS 133. All of these swaps
were terminated in the third quarter of 2006. Changes
in market value related to these interest rate swaps
during 2005 and 2006 were recognized in non-interest
income. In addition, since these swaps were not
considered hedges pursuant to SFAS 133, the quarterly
net settlements were included in non-interest income.
The Companys banking subsidiaries offer certain
derivative products directly to qualified commercial
borrowers. The Company economically hedges customer
derivative transactions by entering into offsetting
derivatives executed with a third party. Derivative
transactions executed as part of this program are not
designated in SFAS 133 hedge relationships and are,
therefore, marked-to-market through earnings each
period. In most cases, the derivatives have
mirror-image terms, which results in the positions
changes in fair value offsetting completely through
earnings each period. However, to the extent that the
derivatives are not a mirror-image, changes in fair
value will not completely offset, resulting in some
earnings impact each period. At December 31, 2007, the
aggregate notional value of interest rate swaps with
various commercial borrowers totaled $32.6 million and
the aggregate notional value of mirror-image interest
rate swaps with third parties also totaled $32.6
million. These interest rate swaps mature between
August 2010 and May 2016. These swaps were reported on
the Companys balance sheet at December 31, 2007, by a
derivative asset of $1.7 million and a derivative
liability of $1.6 million. At December 31, 2006, the
aggregate notional value of interest rate swaps with
various commercial borrowers totaled $21.1 million and
the aggregate notional value of the mirror-image swaps
totaled $21.1 million. At December 31, 2006, these
swaps reported on the Companys balance sheet by a
derivative asset of $506,000 and a derivative liability
of $506,000. These interest rate swaps are not
reflected in the above table.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
Commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest
rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and
forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage
loans to third party investors are considered
derivatives. It is the Companys practice
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
to enter into forward commitments for the future
delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest
rate lock commitments are entered into in order to
economically hedge the effect of changes in interest
rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans.
These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated
in hedge relationships pursuant to SFAS 133. At
December 31, 2007, the Company had a notional amount of
approximately $114 million of interest rate lock
commitments and $219 million of forward commitments for
the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. The
fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives was
reflected by a derivative asset of $528,000 and a
derivative liability
of $543,000. At December 31, 2006, the Company had a
notional amount of approximately $118 million of
interest rate lock commitments and $263 million of
forward commitments for the future delivery of
residential mortgage loans. The fair value of these
mortgage banking derivatives was reflected by a
derivative asset of $360,000 and a derivative liability
of $342,000. Fair values were estimated based on
changes in mortgage rates from the date of the
commitments.
Changes in the fair values of these mortgage-banking
derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Other Derivatives
The Company has also used interest rate caps to hedge
cash flow variability of certain deposit products.
However, no interest rate cap contracts were entered
into in 2007 or 2006, and the Company had no interest
rate cap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2007 or
December 31, 2006.
Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank
or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities
held within the Banks investment portfolios (covered
call options). These option transactions are designed
primarily to increase the total return associated with
the investment securities portfolio. These options do
not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133 and,
accordingly, changes in the fair value of these
contracts are recognized as non-interest income. There
were no covered call options outstanding as of December
31, 2007 or 2006.
(22) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, defines the fair value of a
financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties. The following table presents the carrying amounts and
estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
261,154 |
|
|
|
261,154 |
|
|
|
305,292 |
|
|
|
305,292 |
|
Interest bearing deposits
with banks |
|
|
10,410 |
|
|
|
10,410 |
|
|
|
19,259 |
|
|
|
19,259 |
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
Brokerage customer
receivables |
|
|
24,206 |
|
|
|
24,206 |
|
|
|
24,040 |
|
|
|
24,040 |
|
Mortgage loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
109,552 |
|
|
|
110,774 |
|
|
|
148,331 |
|
|
|
149,512 |
|
Loans, net of unearned
income |
|
|
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
7,040,983 |
|
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
|
|
6,616,989 |
|
Accrued interest
receivable and other |
|
|
120,629 |
|
|
|
120,629 |
|
|
|
121,346 |
|
|
|
121,346 |
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
8,632,961 |
|
|
|
8,873,564 |
|
|
|
8,956,788 |
|
|
|
9,078,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
$ |
3,278,028 |
|
|
|
3,278,028 |
|
|
|
3,069,108 |
|
|
|
3,069,108 |
|
Deposits with stated
maturities |
|
|
4,193,413 |
|
|
|
4,209,146 |
|
|
|
4,800,132 |
|
|
|
4,786,022 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
415,183 |
|
|
|
428,779 |
|
|
|
325,531 |
|
|
|
323,962 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
254,434 |
|
|
|
254,434 |
|
|
|
162,072 |
|
|
|
162,072 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures |
|
|
249,662 |
|
|
|
261,811 |
|
|
|
249,828 |
|
|
|
249,431 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
22,861 |
|
|
|
22,861 |
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities |
|
$ |
8,547,665 |
|
|
|
8,589,143 |
|
|
|
8,717,282 |
|
|
|
8,701,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
contracts |
|
$ |
(9,058 |
) |
|
|
(9,058 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
Mortgage banking
derivatives |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents
include cash and demand balances from banks, Federal
funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements. The carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents approximates fair value due to the short
maturity of those instruments.
Interest bearing deposits with banks. The carrying
value of interest bearing deposits with banks
approximates fair value due to the short maturity of
those instruments.
Available-for-sale securities. The fair values of
available-for-sale securities are based on quoted
market prices, when available. If quoted market prices
are not available, fair values are based quoted market
prices of comparable assets.
Trading account securities. The fair values of trading
account securities are based on quoted market prices,
when available. If quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on quoted market
prices of comparable assets.
Brokerage customer receivables. The carrying value of
brokerage customer receivables approximates fair value
due to the relatively short period of time to repricing
of variable interest rates.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale. Fair value is based on
either observable market prices or prices obtained from
third parties.
Loans. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of
loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans
are analyzed by type such as commercial, residential
real estate, etc. Each category is further segmented
by interest rate type (fixed and variable) and term.
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently,
estimated fair values are based on carrying values.
The fair value of residential loans is based on
secondary market sources for securities backed by
similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan
characteristics. The fair value for other fixed rate
loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows
through the estimated maturity using estimated market
discount rates that reflect credit and interest rate
risks inherent in the loan.
Accrued interest receivable and accrued interest
payable. The carrying values of accrued interest
receivable and accrued interest payable approximate
market values due to the relatively short period of
time to expected realization.
Deposit liabilities. The fair value of deposits with
no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing
deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money market
accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as
of year-end (i.e. the carrying value). The fair value
of certificates of deposit is based on
the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The
discount rate is estimated using the rates currently in
effect for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Notes payable. The carrying value of notes payable
approximates fair value due to the relatively short
period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The fair value of
Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from the
Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash
flow analysis based on current market rates of similar
maturity debt securities to discount cash flows.
Subordinated notes. The carrying value of the
subordinated notes payable approximates fair value due
to the relatively short period of time to repricing of
variable interest rates.
Other borrowings. Carrying value of other borrowings
approximates fair value due to the relatively short
period of time to maturity or repricing.
Junior subordinated debentures. The fair value of the
junior subordinated debentures is based on the
discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Interest rate swap agreements. The fair value is based
on quoted market prices as of the last business day of
the year.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit. The fair value of commitments to extend credit
is based on fees currently charged to enter into
similar arrangements, the remaining term of the
agreement, the present creditworthiness of the
coun-terparty, and the difference between current
interest rates and committed interest rates on the
commitments. The majority of the Companys commitments
contain variable interest rates; thus the carrying
value approximates fair value.
The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees
currently charged for similar arrangements. The fair
value of such commitments is not material and is not
shown here.
Mortgage banking derivatives consist of commitments to
fund mortgages for sale into the secondary market
(interest rate locks) and forward commitments to end
investors for the sale of such loans. Fair value is
determined based on changes in mortgage rates from the
date of the commitments.
The above fair value estimates were made at a point in
time based on relevant market information and other
assumptions about the financial instruments. As no
active market exists for a significant portion of the
Companys financial instruments, fair value estimates
were based on judgments
regarding current economic conditions, future expected
cash flows and loss experience, risk characteristics
and other factors. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and therefore cannot
be calculated with precision. Changes in these
assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.
In addition, the fair value estimates only reflect
existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments
and do not attempt to assess the value of
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial
instruments. For example, the value of depositor
relationships, premises and equipment, intangible
assets and the Companys trust and asset management
businesses have not been considered.
(23) Shareholders Equity
A summary of the Companys common and preferred stock
at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized |
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
26,281,296 |
|
|
|
25,802,024 |
|
Shares outstanding |
|
|
23,430,490 |
|
|
|
25,457,935 |
|
Cash dividend per share |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized |
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reserves shares of its authorized common
stock specifically for its Stock Incentive Plan, its
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and its Directors Deferred
Fee and Stock Plan. The reserved shares and these
plans are detailed in Note 18 Employee Benefit and
Stock Plans.
The Company has issued warrants to acquire common
stock. The warrants entitle the holders to purchase one
share of the Companys common stock at a purchase price
of $30.50 per share. Warrants outstanding at December
31, 2007 and 2006 were 19,000 and 33,000, respectively.
The expiration date on the remaining outstanding warrants
at December 31, 2007 is February 2013.
On March 30, 2005, Wintrust consummated the partial
settlement of the forward sale agreement the Company
entered into on December 14, 2004 with Royal Bank of
Canada, an affiliate of RBC Capital Markets
Corporation, relating to the forward sale by Wintrust
of 1.2 million shares of Wintrusts common stock.
Pursuant to and in partial settlement of the forward
sale agreement, Wintrust
issued 1.0 million shares of its common stock, and
received net proceeds of $55.8 million from Royal Bank
of Canada. Additionally, on December 14, 2005,
Win-trust amended certain terms of the forward sale
agreement for the purpose of extending the maturity
date for the remaining 200,000 shares from December 17,
2005 to December 17, 2006. In conjunction with the
completion of the acquisition of Hinsbrook Bank in May 2006, the
forward sale agreement was fully settled with Wintrust
issuing 200,000 shares of its common stock and
receiving net proceeds of $11.6 million. The Company
issued 1,120,033 shares of common stock in May 2006 in
connection with the acquisition Hinsbrook Bank.
In July 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 2.0 million shares
of the Companys outstanding common stock over 18
months. The Company repurchased a total of
approximately 1.8 million shares at an average price of
$45.74 per share under the July 2006 share repurchase
plan. In April 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
terminated the prior plan and authorized the repurchase
of up to an additional 1.0 million shares of the
Companys outstanding common stock over 12 months. The
Company began to repurchase shares under the new plan
in July 2007 and repurchased all 1.0 million shares at
an average price of $37.57 per share during the third
and fourth quarters of 2007. As of December 31, 2007,
the Company had 2,850,806 shares in Treasury Stock. In
January 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 1.0 million
additional shares of the Companys outstanding common
stock over the next 12 months.
At the January 2008 Board of Directors meeting, a
semi-annual cash dividend of $0.18 per share ($0.36 on
an annualized basis) was declared. It was paid on
February 21, 2008 to shareholders of record as of
February 7, 2008.
The following table summarizes the components of other
comprehensive income (loss), including the related
income tax effects, for the years ending December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
16,552 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
(16,824 |
) |
Related tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(6,512 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
|
Net after tax unrealized gains (losses)
on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
10,040 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
(10,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for
net gains realized in net income
during the year |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
Related tax expense |
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
Net after tax reclassification adjustment |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net
of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
(11,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)
on derivatives used as cash
flow hedges |
|
|
(6,677 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
173 |
|
Related tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)
on derivatives used as cash
flow hedges |
|
|
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,089 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
(10,975 |
) |
|
A roll-forward of the change in accumulated other
comprehensive loss for the years ending December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss at beginning of year |
|
$ |
(17,761 |
) |
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
|
|
(7,358 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
(10,975 |
) |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss at end of year |
|
$ |
(13,672 |
) |
|
|
(17,761 |
) |
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 is comprised of the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized losses
on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(8,097 |
) |
|
|
(16,282 |
) |
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
Accumulated unrealized losses on
derivatives used as cash flow hedges |
|
|
(5,575 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive
loss at end of year |
|
$ |
(13,672 |
) |
|
|
(17,761 |
) |
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
|
(24) Segment Information
The Companys operations consist of four primary
segments: banking, premium finance, Tricom and wealth
management. Through its fifteen bank subsidiaries
located in Chicago, suburban Chicago and southern
Wisconsin communities, the Company provides traditional
community banking products and services to individuals
and businesses such as accepting deposits, advancing
loans, administering ATMs, maintaining safe deposit
boxes, and providing other related services. The
premium finance operations consist of financing the
payment of commercial insurance premiums, on a national
basis, through FIFC and Broadway. Significant portions
of the loans originated by FIFC are sold to the Banks
and are retained in each of their loan portfolios. The
Tricom segment encompasses the operations of the
Companys non-bank subsidiary that provides short-term
accounts receivable financing and value-added
out-sourced administrative services, such as data
processing of payrolls, billing and cash management
services, to temporary staffing
service clients throughout the United States. The
wealth management segment includes WHTC, WHAMC and WHI.
WHTC offers trust services to existing customers of the
Banks and targets affluent individuals and small to
mid-size businesses whose needs command personalized
attention by experienced trust and asset management
professionals. WHI, a broker/dealer, provides a
full-range of investment products and services tailored
to meet the specific needs of individual investors,
primarily in the Midwest. WHI also provides a full
range of investment services to clients through a
network of community-based financial institutions
primarily in Illinois. WHAMC is a registered investment
advisor and the investment advisory affiliate of WHI.
The four reportable segments are strategic business
units that are separately managed as they offer
different products and services and have different
marketing strategies. In addition, each segments
customer base has varying characteristics. The banking
segment has a different regulatory environment than the
premium finance, Tricom and wealth management segments.
While the Companys management monitors each of the
fifteen bank subsidiaries operations and profitability
separately, as well as that of its mortgage company,
these subsidiaries have been aggregated into one
reportable operating segment due to the similarities in
products and services, customer base, operations,
profitability measures, and economic characteristics.
The segment financial information provided in the
following tables has been derived from the internal
profitability reporting system used by management to
monitor and manage the financial performance of the
Company. The accounting policies of the segments are
generally the same as those described in the Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company
evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit
or loss and other appropriate profitability measures
common to each segment. Certain indirect expenses have
been allocated based on actual volume measurements and
other criteria, as appropriate. Intersegment revenue
and transfers are generally accounted for at current
market prices. The parent and intersegment
eliminations reflect parent company information and
intersegment eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
The following is a summary of certain operating information for reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
Finance |
|
Tricom |
|
Management |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
259,049 |
|
|
|
60,504 |
|
|
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
12,931 |
|
|
|
(74,825 |
) |
|
|
261,550 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,326 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
14,879 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
36,315 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
39,257 |
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
80,088 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
186,762 |
|
|
|
11,231 |
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
|
39,836 |
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
242,935 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
31,945 |
|
|
|
19,619 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
|
(28,921 |
) |
|
|
28,171 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
62,331 |
|
|
|
29,777 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
7,724 |
|
|
|
(45,558 |
) |
|
|
55,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at end of year |
|
$ |
9,334,725 |
|
|
|
1,123,177 |
|
|
|
41,551 |
|
|
|
63,479 |
|
|
|
(1,194,073 |
) |
|
|
9,368,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
235,166 |
|
|
|
42,376 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
6,347 |
|
|
|
(38,917 |
) |
|
|
248,886 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
7,057 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
40,625 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
38,021 |
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
91,232 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
175,088 |
|
|
|
10,593 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
39,177 |
|
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
228,820 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
33,274 |
|
|
|
12,882 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
(11,548 |
) |
|
|
37,748 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
61,087 |
|
|
|
19,588 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
(19,255 |
) |
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at end of year |
|
$ |
9,447,666 |
|
|
|
1,222,197 |
|
|
|
57,570 |
|
|
|
58,378 |
|
|
|
(1,213,959 |
) |
|
|
9,571,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
211,705 |
|
|
|
40,533 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
(40,999 |
) |
|
|
216,759 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
6,676 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
50,995 |
|
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
36,619 |
|
|
|
(5,095 |
) |
|
|
93,557 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
147,512 |
|
|
|
10,034 |
|
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
39,017 |
|
|
|
(3,472 |
) |
|
|
198,690 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
39,240 |
|
|
|
13,884 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(16,012 |
) |
|
|
37,934 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
69,447 |
|
|
|
21,728 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(25,384 |
) |
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at end of year |
|
$ |
8,065,671 |
|
|
|
859,536 |
|
|
|
63,858 |
|
|
|
61,828 |
|
|
|
(873,851 |
) |
|
|
8,177,042 |
|
|
The premium finance segment information shown in the above tables was derived from internal
profitability reports, which assumes that all loans originated and sold to the banking segment are
retained within the segment that originated the loans. All related loan interest income,
allocations for interest expense, provisions for credit losses and allocations for other expenses
are included in the premium finance segment. The banking segment information also includes all
amounts related to these loans, as these loans are retained within the Banks loan portfolios.
Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the
contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates the net interest income
earned by the banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management segment to
the wealth management segment. Accordingly, the intersegment eliminations include adjustments
necessary for each cate-gory to agree with the related consolidated financial statements.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company changed the measurement methodology for the net
interest income component of the wealth management segment. In conjunction with the change in the
executive management team for this segment in the third quarter of 2006, the contribution
attributable to the wealth management deposits was redefined to measure the full net interest
income contribution. In previous periods, the contribution from these deposits to the wealth
management segment was limited to the value as an alternative source of funding for each Bank. As
such, the contribution in previous periods did not capture the total net interest income
contribution of this funding source. Executive management of this segment currently uses this
measured contribution to determine the overall profitability of the wealth management segment.
(25) Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements
Condensed parent company only financial statements of Wintrust follow:
Balance Sheets
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
47,093 |
|
|
|
64,453 |
|
Loans to subsidiaries |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,095,504 |
|
|
|
1,064,294 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,347 |
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
23,650 |
|
|
|
26,046 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,176,469 |
|
|
|
1,166,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
19,437 |
|
|
|
8,836 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
60,700 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
32,115 |
|
|
|
46,328 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,662 |
|
|
|
249,828 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
739,555 |
|
|
|
773,346 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,176,469 |
|
|
|
1,166,088 |
|
|
Statements of Income
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
105,900 |
|
|
|
183,550 |
|
|
|
45,125 |
|
Trading gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,738 |
|
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
Gain on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other income |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
113,058 |
|
|
|
194,532 |
|
|
|
44,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
28,548 |
|
|
|
23,609 |
|
|
|
18,435 |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
7,071 |
|
|
|
3,581 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
6,555 |
|
|
|
5,445 |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
41,410 |
|
|
|
36,125 |
|
|
|
26,811 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income
(loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
71,648 |
|
|
|
158,407 |
|
|
|
17,865 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(13,172 |
) |
|
|
(9,270 |
) |
|
|
(10,163 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
84,820 |
|
|
|
167,677 |
|
|
|
28,028 |
|
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(29,167 |
) |
|
|
(101,184 |
) |
|
|
38,988 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Gain on sale of land |
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
Fair market value change of interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,809 |
) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(4,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(5,610 |
) |
|
|
(18,986 |
) |
|
|
(9,398 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
8,363 |
|
|
|
8,842 |
|
Equity in undistributed net loss (income) of subsidiaries |
|
|
29,167 |
|
|
|
101,184 |
|
|
|
(38,988 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
83,053 |
|
|
|
162,631 |
|
|
|
37,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions to subsidiaries |
|
|
(39,156 |
) |
|
|
(196,050 |
) |
|
|
(13,650 |
) |
Cash paid for business combinations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,821 |
) |
|
|
(108,145 |
) |
Other investing activity, net |
|
|
28,516 |
|
|
|
(49,233 |
) |
|
|
(5,021 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(10,640 |
) |
|
|
(302,104 |
) |
|
|
(126,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in notes payable and other borrowings, net |
|
|
33,772 |
|
|
|
56,165 |
|
|
|
(7,221 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of subordinated note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Redemption of junior subordinated debentures, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,050 |
) |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
55,845 |
|
Issuance of common stock resulting from exercise of stock options, employee
stock purchase plan and conversion of como stock purchases |
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
8,769 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(7,831 |
) |
|
|
(6,961 |
) |
|
|
(5,449 |
) |
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(105,853 |
) |
|
|
(16,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(72,326 |
) |
|
|
93,425 |
|
|
|
71,944 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(46,048 |
) |
|
|
(17,391 |
) |
Cash at beginning of year |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
46,696 |
|
|
|
64,087 |
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
46,696 |
|
|
(26) Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for
2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
$ |
55,653 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
67,016 |
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
24,107 |
|
|
|
25,011 |
|
|
|
23,198 |
|
Effect of dilutive common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and
effect of dilutive common shares |
|
|
(C |
) |
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
25,927 |
|
|
|
24,337 |
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
|
(A/B |
) |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
(A/C |
) |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
The effect of dilutive common shares outstanding results from stock options, restricted stock unit
awards, stock warrants, shares to be issued under the SPP and the DDFS Plan all being treated as if
they had been either exercised or issued, and are computed by application of the treasury stock
method.
(27) Quarterly Financial Summary (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Quarters |
|
2006 Quarters |
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
152,307 |
|
|
|
152,888 |
|
|
|
154,645 |
|
|
|
151,717 |
|
|
|
120,297 |
|
|
|
135,116 |
|
|
|
148,893 |
|
|
|
153,640 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
87,637 |
|
|
|
87,633 |
|
|
|
88,458 |
|
|
|
86,279 |
|
|
|
63,133 |
|
|
|
73,874 |
|
|
|
83,778 |
|
|
|
88,274 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
64,670 |
|
|
|
65,255 |
|
|
|
66,187 |
|
|
|
65,438 |
|
|
|
57,164 |
|
|
|
61,242 |
|
|
|
65,115 |
|
|
|
65,366 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for credit losses |
|
|
62,863 |
|
|
|
62,765 |
|
|
|
61,822 |
|
|
|
59,221 |
|
|
|
55,628 |
|
|
|
59,499 |
|
|
|
63,230 |
|
|
|
63,473 |
|
Non-interest income, excluding
net securities gains |
|
|
19,686 |
|
|
|
20,658 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
25,134 |
|
|
|
28,645 |
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
|
18,833 |
|
|
|
19,350 |
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
59,744 |
|
|
|
60,138 |
|
|
|
59,487 |
|
|
|
63,566 |
|
|
|
54,460 |
|
|
|
55,907 |
|
|
|
58,989 |
|
|
|
59,465 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
22,852 |
|
|
|
23,477 |
|
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
23,623 |
|
|
|
29,893 |
|
|
|
27,885 |
|
|
|
23,017 |
|
|
|
23,447 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,171 |
|
|
|
8,067 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
7,980 |
|
|
|
10,880 |
|
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,681 |
|
|
|
15,410 |
|
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
15,643 |
|
|
|
19,013 |
|
|
|
17,611 |
|
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
|
15,010 |
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Report on Managements Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Wintrust Financial Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation
of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated
financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and necessarily include some amounts
that are based on managements best estimates and judgments.
We, as management of Wintrust Financial Corporation, are responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce
reliable financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the
financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability
through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they
are identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent
limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in
conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective
system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation.
Management assessed the Corporations system of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, in relation to criteria for the effective internal control over financial
reporting as described in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
concludes that, as of December 31, 2007, its system of internal control over financial reporting is
effective and meets the criteria of the Internal Control Integrated Framework. Ernst & Young
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on
managements assessment of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Wehmer
|
|
David L. Stoehr |
President and
|
|
Executive Vice President & |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Lake Forest, Illinois
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
on Effectiveness of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Wintrust Financial Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Wintrust Financial Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report on Managements Assessment of Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Wintrust Financial Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Wintrust Financial Corporation
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2007 of Wintrust Financial Corporation and our report dated
February 28, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Wintrust Financial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Wintrust Financial
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, in 2006 the Company changed its method of
accounting for stock options.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Wintrust Financial Corporations internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 28, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 |
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the
Transition Period from
____________
to
____________ |
Commission File Number 0-21923
Wintrust Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Illinois
|
|
36-3873352 |
(State of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number,
including area code: (847) 615-4096
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, no par value
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
o
Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
o
Yes þ No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30,
2007 (the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second quarter), determined
using the closing price of the common stock on that day of $43.85, as reported by the Nasdaq
National Market, was $1,022,930,827.
As of
February 25, 2008, the registrant had 23,546,944 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May
22, 2008 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Wintrust Financial
Corporation |
Annual Report on Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Annual Report includes the materials required in Form 10-K filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission. The integration of the two documents gives stockholders and
other interested parties timely, efficient, and comprehensive information on 2007 results. Portions
of the Annual Report are not required by the Form 10-K report and are not filed as part of the
Corporations Form 10-K. Only those portions of the Annual
Report referenced in this Table of Contents are incorporated in the Form 10-K.
PART I
ITEM I. BUSINESS
Wintrust Financial Corporation, an Illinois corporation (Wintrust or the Company), which was
incorporated in 1992, is a financial holding company based in Lake Forest, Illinois, with total
assets of approximately $9.4 billion at December 31, 2007. The Company engages in the business of
providing traditional community banking services, wealth management services, commercial insurance
premium financing, short-term accounts receivable financing, and certain administrative services,
such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services.
The Company provides community-oriented, personal and commercial banking services to customers
located in the greater Chicago, Illinois and southern Wisconsin metropolitan areas through its
fifteen wholly-owned banking subsidiaries (collectively, the Banks). The Company controls nine
Illinois-chartered banks, Lake Forest Bank and Trust Company (Lake Forest Bank), Hinsdale Bank
and Trust Company (Hinsdale Bank), North Shore Community Bank and Trust Company (North Shore
Bank), Libertyville Bank and Trust Company (Libertyville Bank), Northbrook Bank & Trust Company
(Northbrook Bank), Village Bank & Trust (Village Bank), Wheaton Bank & Trust Company (Wheaton
Bank), State Bank of The Lakes and St. Charles Bank & Trust Company (St. Charles Bank). In
addition, the Company has one Wisconsin-chartered bank, Town Bank, and five nationally chartered
banks, Barrington Bank and Trust Company, N.A. (Barrington Bank), Crystal Lake Bank & Trust
Company, N.A. (Crystal Lake Bank), Advantage National Bank (Advantage Bank), Beverly Bank &
Trust Company, N.A. (Beverly Bank) and Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A. (Old Plank Trail
Bank).
The Company provides a full range of wealth management services through three separate
subsidiaries, including Wayne Hummer Trust Company, N.A. (WHTC), Wayne Hummer Investments, LLC
(WHI), a broker-dealer and subsidiary of North Shore Bank and Wayne Hummer Asset Management
Company (WHAMC), a registered investment adviser. Focused Investments, LLC (Focused), which was
a brokerdealer and subsidiary of WHI, was merged into WHI in 2006. The Company acquired WHI,
Focused and WHAMC in February 2002 and these companies are referred to collectively as the Wayne
Hummer Companies.
The Company provides financing for the payment of commercial insurance premiums (premium
finance receivables), on a national basis, through First Insurance Funding Corporation (FIFC), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Crabtree Capital Corporation (Crabtree) which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of
Lake Forest Bank. On November 1, 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium Funding Corporation
(Broadway). Broadway is a commercial finance company that specializes in financing insurance
premiums for corporate entities. Its products are marketed through insurance agents and brokers
to their small to mid-size corporate clients. Broadway is headquartered in New York City and
services clients primarily in the northeastern United States and California. Broadway is a
subsidiary of FIFC.
The Company also provides short-term accounts receivable financing (Tricom finance
receivables) and out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing
and cash management services, to clients in the temporary staffing industry located throughout the
United States, through Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (Tricom), a whollyowned subsidiary of Hinsdale
Bank.
Through SGB Corporation d/b/a WestAmerica Mortgage Company (WestAmerica) and its affiliate
Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc. (Guardian), the Company engages in the origination and
purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market and provides the document
preparation and other loan closing services to a network of mortgage brokers. WestAmerica maintains
principal origination offices in nine states, including Illinois, and originates loans in other
states through wholesale and correspondent offices. WestAmerica and Guardian are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Barrington Bank. The Company acquired Northview Mortgage, LLC, a mortgage broker,
in September 2004, in connection with its purchase of Northview Financial Corporation. Northview
Mortgage, LLC was inactive in 2006 and merged out of existence in 2007. Mortgage banking operations
are also performed within each of the Banks.
As a mid-size financial services company, management expects to benefit from greater access to
financial and managerial resources while maintaining its commitment to local decision-making and to
its community banking philosophy. Management also believes the Company is positioned to compete
more effectively with other larger and more diversified banks, bank holding companies and other
financial services companies as it continues to execute its growth strategy through additional
branch openings and de novo bank formations, expansion of its wealth management and premium finance
business, development of additional specialized earning asset niches and potential acquisitions of
other community-oriented banks or specialty finance companies.
Additional information regarding the Companys business and strategies is included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operations section of
this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Community Banking
The Company provides banking and financial services primarily
to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental
units and institutional clients residing primarily in the
Banks local service areas. These services include traditional
deposit products such as demand, NOW, money market, savings
and time deposit accounts, as well as a number of unique
deposit products targeted to specific market segments. The
Banks also offer home equity, home mortgage, consumer, real
estate and commercial loans, safe deposit facilities, ATMs,
internet banking and other innovative and traditional services
specially tailored to meet the needs of customers in their market
areas.
Wintrust developed its banking franchise through the de novo
organization of nine banks and the purchase of seven banks,
one of which was merged into an existing Wintrust bank. The
organizational efforts began in 1991, when a group of experienced
bankers and local business people identified an unfilled
niche in the Chicago metropolitan area retail banking market.
As large banks acquired smaller ones and personal service was
subjected to consolidation strategies, the opportunity increased
for locally owned and operated, highly personal service-oriented
banks. As a result, Lake Forest Bank was founded in
December 1991 to service the Lake Forest and Lake Bluff communities.
Following the same business plan, the Company
started Hinsdale Bank in 1993 to service the communities of
Hinsdale and Burr Ridge, North Shore Bank in 1994 to service
the communities of Wilmette and Kenilworth, Libertyville
Bank in 1995 to service the communities of Libertyville, Vernon
Hills and Mundelein, Barrington Bank in 1996 to service
the greater Barrington/Inverness areas, Crystal Lake Bank in
1997 to service the communities of Crystal Lake and Cary,
Northbrook Bank in 2000 to service the communities of
Northbrook, Glenview and Deerfield, Beverly Bank in 2004 to
service the communities of Beverly Hills and Morgan Park on
the southwest side of Chicago and Old Plank Trail Bank in
2006 to serve the communities of New Lenox, Mokena and
Frankfurt. Since the initial openings of these nine banks, each
has opened additional branches in adjacent and nearby communities
to expand their franchise.
Wintrust completed its first bank acquisitions in the fourth
quarter of 2003, with the acquisitions of Advantage Bank in
October 2003 and Village Bank in December 2003. In September
2004, Wintrust acquired Northview Financial Corporation
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Northview Bank &
Trust Company, with banking locations in Northfield,
Mundelein and Wheaton, Illinois, and in December 2004,
Wintrust relocated the banks charter to its Wheaton branch,
renamed the bank Wheaton Bank & Trust Company and
transferred its Mundelein branch to Libertyville Bank and its
Northfield branches to Northbrook Bank. In October 2004,
Wintrust acquired Town Bankshares, Ltd. and its whollyowned
subsidiary, Town Bank, with locations in Delafield and
Madison, Wisconsin. Town Bank represents the Companys
first banking operation outside of Illinois. In January 2005, the
Company completed its acquisition of Antioch Holding Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, State Bank of The
Lakes, and on March 31, 2005 the Company acquired First
Northwest Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary First
Northwest Bank. First Northwest Bank was merged into Village
Bank in May 2005 as both banks were located in and
served the same market area. In May 2006, the Company completed
its acquisition of Hinsbrook Bancshares, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Hinsbrook Bank & Trust, with five
banking locations in the western suburbs of Chicago, including
Willowbrook, Downers Grove, Darien, Glen Ellyn and
Geneva. In November 2006, Wintrust relocated the banks
charter to its Geneva branch, renamed the bank St. Charles
Bank & Trust Company, and transferred the Willowbrook,
Downers Grove and Darien branches to Hinsdale Bank and the
Glen Ellyn branch to Wheaton Bank. These branch transactions
were done to align the Banks branches within the same
market area under one bank charter. As of December 31, 2007,
the Company had 77 banking locations.
All of the banks acquired by Wintrust share the same commitment
to community banking and customer service as the banks
the Company organized. Each of the acquired banks, with the
exception of Hinsbrook Bank (currently Wheaton Bank) and
State Bank of The Lakes, began operations within the same
time frame in which Wintrust organized its Banks. The charters
of Hinsbrook Bank and State Bank of The Lakes, however,
date back to 1987 and 1894, respectively.
The deposits of each of the Banks are insured by the FDIC up
to the applicable limits. Currently the standard maximum
deposit insurance amount is $100,000 per non-retirement
account capacity, subject to possible cost-of-living adjustments
after 2010, and up to $250,000 for certain retirement
accounts. In addition, each Bank is subject to regulation, supervision
and regular examination by: (1) the Secretary of the Illinois
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation
(Illinois Secretary) and the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Federal Reserve) for Illinois-chartered
banks; (2) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC) for nationally-chartered banks or (3) the Wisconsin
Department of Financial Institutions (Wisconsin Department)
and the Federal Reserve for Town Bank.
Specialty Lending
The Company conducts its specialty lending business through
indirect non-bank subsidiaries and divisions of its Banks.
FIFC, headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, is the Companys
most significant specialized lending niche. FIFC makes loans to
businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their
commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by
FIFC working through independent medium and large insurance
agents and brokers located throughout the United States.
The insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial
customers purchases of liability, property and casualty and
other commercial insurance. This lending involves relatively
rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan
originations. Due to the indirect nature of this lending and
because the borrowers are located nationwide, this segment
may be more susceptible to third party fraud. The majority of
the loans originated by FIFC have been purchased by the
Banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity.
These loans generally provide the Banks with higher yields than
alternative investments. During 2007, FIFC originated approximately
$3.1 billion of premium finance receivables and sold
approximately $230 million, or 7.5%, of the premium finance
receivables generated during the year to unrelated third parties,
with servicing retained. The Company has been selling these
loans to third parties since 1999, suspended such sales in the
second half of 2006, and resumed selling these loans in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Selling these loans to third parties,
allows the Company to originate loans without compromising
the liquidity position of the Company. FIFC is licensed or otherwise
qualified to do business as an insurance premium
finance company in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
The Company acquired Broadway in November 2007. Broadway
is a commercial finance company that specializes in financing
insurance premiums for corporate entities. Similar to
FIFC, its products are marketed through insurance agents and
brokers to their small to mid-size corporate clients. Broadway
is headquartered in New York City and services clients primarily
in the northeastern United States and California. Broadway
is a subsidiary of FIFC.
Tricom was acquired by Hinsdale Bank in October 1999 as part
of the Companys strategy to pursue specialty lending niches
and is an operating subsidiary of Hinsdale Bank. It is located in
the Milwaukee, Wisconsin metropolitan area and has been in
business since 1989. Through Tricom, the Company provides
high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and
value-added, outsourced administrative services, such as data
processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services to
the temporary staffing industry. Tricoms clients, located
throughout the United States, provide staffing services to businesses
in diversified industries. During 2007, Tricom processed
payrolls with associated client billings of approximately $467
million and contributed approximately $7.9 million of revenue,
net of interest expense, to the Company.
The Company also engages in several other specialty lending
areas through divisions of the Banks. Hinsdale Bank operates
an indirect auto lending program which originates new and
used automobile loans that are purchased by all of the Banks.
The loans are generated through a network of automobile dealers
located in the Chicago area with which Hinsdale Bank has
established relationships. The indirect automobile loans are
secured by new and used vehicles and are diversified among
many individual borrowers. Like other consumer loans, the
indirect auto loans are subject to the Banks established credit
standards. Management regards substantially all of these loans as
prime quality loans and continually monitors the dealer relationships
to deter third party fraud. The Banks are not dependent
on any one dealer as a source of such loans. At December
31, 2007, indirect auto loans totaled $227.0 million and comprised
approximately 3.5% of the Companys loan portfolio.
Other specialty lending conducted through the Banks include
Barrington Banks Community Advantage program which provides
lending, deposit and cash management services to condominium,
homeowner and community associations, Hinsdale
Banks mortgage warehouse lending program which provides
loan and deposit services to mortgage brokerage companies
located predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area, and
Crystal Lake Banks North American Aviation Financing division
which provides small aircraft lending. These specialty loans
(including the indirect auto loans) generated through divisions
of the Banks comprised approximately 6.0% of the Companys
loan and lease portfolio at December 31, 2007.
WestAmerica and Guardian were acquired by Barrington Bank
in May 2004 to enhance and diversify the Companys revenue
sources and earning asset base. WestAmerica engages primarily
in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale
into the secondary market, and Guardian provides the document
preparation and other loan closing services to WestAmerica
and its network of mortgage brokers. WestAmerica sells its
loans servicing released and does not currently engage in mortgage
loan servicing. WestAmerica maintains principal origination
offices in nine states, including Illinois, and originates
loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent
offices. WestAmerica also established offices at several of the
Banks and provides the Banks with the ability to use
an enhanced loan origination and documentation system.
This allows WestAmerica and the Banks to better utilize existing
operational capacity and improve the product offering for
the Banks customers. WestAmericas production of adjustable
rate mortgage loan products may be purchased by the Banks
for their loan portfolios resulting in additional earning assets to
the combined organization.
Wealth Management Activities
The Company currently offers a full range of wealth management
services through three separate subsidiaries, including
trust and investment services, asset management and securities
brokerage services, marketed primarily under the Wayne Hummer
name. Wintrust acquired the Wayne Hummer Companies,
headquartered in Chicago, in February 2002. To further
expand the Companys wealth management business, in February 2003,
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
the Company acquired Lake Forest Capital Management
Company, a registered investment advisor with approximately
$300 million of assets under management upon acquisition.
Lake Forest Capital Management Company was merged into WHAMC.
WHTC, the Companys trust subsidiary, offers trust and
investment management services to clients through offices
located in downtown Chicago and at various banking offices of
the Companys fifteen banks. Assets under administration
and/or management by WHTC as of December 31, 2007 were
approximately $1.0 billion. WHTC is subject to regulation,
supervision and regular examination by the OCC.
WHI, the Companys registered broker/dealer subsidiary, has
been in operations since 1931. Through WHI, the Company
provides a full range of private client and securities brokerage
services to clients located primarily in the Midwest. WHI client
assets were approximately $5.6 billion at December 31, 2007.
WHI is headquartered in downtown Chicago, operates an
office in Appleton, Wisconsin, and as of December 31, 2007,
established branch locations in offices at a majority of the
Companys banks. WHI also provides a full range of investment
services to clients through a network of relationships with
community-based financial institutions primarily located in
Illinois.
WHAMC, a registered investment adviser, provides money
management services and advisory services to individuals and
institutional municipal and tax-exempt organizations. In addition,
WHAMC also provides portfolio management and financial
supervision for a wide range of pension and profit-sharing
plans. WHAMC had approximately $541 million of assets
under management at December 31, 2007.
Competition
The Company competes in the commercial banking industry
through the Banks in the communities each serves. The commercial
banking industry is highly competitive, and the Banks
face strong direct competition for deposits, loans, and other
financial-related services. The Banks compete with other commercial
banks, thrifts, credit unions, stockbrokers, and the
finance divisions of automobile companies. Some of these
competitors are local, while others are statewide or nationwide.
The Banks have a community banking and marketing strategy.
In keeping with this strategy, the Banks provide highly personalized
and responsive service, a characteristic of locally-owned
and managed institutions. As such, the Banks compete for
deposits principally by offering depositors a variety of deposit
programs, convenient office locations, hours and other services,
and for loan originations primarily through the interest rates
and loan fees they charge, the efficiency and quality of services
they provide to borrowers and the variety of their loan and cash
management products. Some of the financial institutions and
financial services organizations with which the Banks compete
are not subject to the same degree of regulation as imposed on
financial holding companies, Illinois or Wisconsin state banks
and national banking associations. In addition, the larger banking
organizations have significantly greater resources than those
available to the Banks. As a result, such competitors have
advantages over the Banks in providing certain non-deposit
services.
FIFC and Broadway encounter intense competition from
numerous other firms, including a number of national commercial
premium finance companies, companies affiliated with
insurance carriers, independent insurance brokers who offer
premium finance services, banks and other lending institutions.
Some of their competitors are larger and have greater financial
and other resources and are better known than FIFC and Broadway.
FIFC competes with these entities by emphasizing a high
level of knowledge of the insurance industry, flexibility in structuring
financing transactions, and the timely purchase of qualifying
contracts. Management believes that its commitment to
service also distinguishes it from its competitors.
The Companys wealth management companies (WHTC,
WHI and WHAMC) compete with more established wealth
management subsidiaries of other larger bank holding companies
as well as with other trust companies, brokerage and other
financial service companies, stockbrokers and financial advisors.
The Company believes it can successfully compete for trust,
asset management and brokerage business by offering personalized
attention and customer service to small to mid-size businesses
and affluent individuals. The Company continues to
recruit and hire experienced professionals from the more established
Chicago area wealth management companies, which is
expected to help in attracting new customer relationships.
WestAmerica and Guardian, as well as the mortgage banking
functions within the Banks, compete with large mortgage brokers
as well as other banking organizations. The mortgage
banking business is very competitive and significantly impacted
by changes in mortgage interest rates. The Company believes
that mortgage banking revenue will be a continuous source of
revenue, but the level of revenue will be impacted by changes
in mortgage interest rates.
Tricom competes with numerous other firms, including a small
number of similar niche finance companies and payroll processing
firms, as well as various finance companies, banks and
other lending institutions. Tricoms management believes that
its commitment to service distinguishes it from competitors. To
the extent that other finance companies, financial institutions
and payroll processing firms add greater programs and services
to their existing businesses, Tricoms operations could be
adversely affected.
Employees
At December 31, 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries
employed a total of 1,964 full-time-equivalent employees. The
Company provides its employees with comprehensive medical
and dental benefit plans, life insurance plans, 401(k) plans and
an employee stock purchase plan. The Company considers its
relationship with its employees to be good.
Available Information
The Companys internet address is www.wintrust.com. The
Company makes available at this address, free of charge, its
annual report on Form 10-K, its annual reports to shareholders,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed
with, or furnished to, the SEC.
Supervision and Regulation
Bank holding companies, banks and investment firms are
extensively regulated under federal and state law. References
under this heading to applicable statutes or regulations are brief
summaries or portions thereof which do not purport to be
complete and which are qualified in their entirety by reference
to those statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable
laws or regulations may have a material effect on the business
of commercial banks and bank holding companies, including
the Company, the Banks, FIFC, Broadway, WHTC, WHI,
WHAMC, Tricom, WestAmerica and Guardian. However,
management is not aware of any current recommendations by
any regulatory authority which, if implemented, would have or
would be reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity,
capital resources, or operations of the Company, the Banks,
FIFC, Broadway, WHTC, WHI, WHAMC, Tricom, WestAmerica or Guardian. The supervision, regulation and examination
of banks and bank holding companies by bank regulatory
agencies are intended primarily for the protection of
depositors rather than stockholders of banks and bank holding
companies.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
The Company has elected to be treated by the Federal Reserve
as a financial holding company for purposes of the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, including regulations
promulgated by the Federal Reserve (the BHC Act), as augmented
by the provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the
GLB Act), which established a comprehensive framework to
permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies
and securities firms. Bank holding companies that elect to
be treated as financial holding companies may engage in an
expanded range of activities, including the businesses conducted
by the Wayne Hummer Companies. Financial holding
companies, unlike traditional bank holding companies, can
engage in certain activities without prior Federal Reserve
approval, subject to certain post-commencement notice procedures.
Banking subsidiaries of financial holding companies are
required to be well capitalized and well managed as defined
in the applicable regulatory standards. If these conditions are
not maintained, and the financial holding company fails to correct
any deficiency within 180 days, the Federal Reserve may
require the Company to either divest control of its banking
subsidiaries or, at the election of the Company, cease to engage
in any activities not permissible for a bank holding company
that is not a financial holding company. Moreover, during the
period of noncompliance, the Federal Reserve can place any
limitations on the financial holding company that it believes to
be appropriate. Furthermore, if the Federal Reserve determines
that a financial holding company has not maintained at least a
satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act at
all of its controlled banking subsidiaries, the Company will not
be able to commence any new financial activities or acquire a
company that engages in such activities, although the Company
will still be allowed to engage in activities closely related
to banking and make investments in the ordinary course of
conducting merchant banking activities. The Company
became a financial holding company in 2002 and currently satisfies
the requirements to maintain its status as a financial holding
company.
The Company continues to be subject to supervision and regulation
by the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act. The Company
is required to file with the Federal Reserve periodic
reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve
may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve
examines the Company and may examine the Banks and the
Companys other subsidiaries.
The BHC Act requires prior Federal Reserve approval for,
among other things, the acquisition by a bank holding company
of direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of
the voting shares or substantially all the assets of any bank, or
for a merger or consolidation of a bank holding company with
another bank holding company. With certain exceptions for
financial holding companies, the BHC Act prohibits a bank
holding company from acquiring direct or indirect ownership
or control of voting shares of any company which is not a business
that is financial in nature or incidental thereto, and from
engaging directly or indirectly in any activity that is not financial
in nature or incidental thereto. Also, as discussed below, the
Federal Reserve expects bank holding companies to maintain
strong capital positions while experiencing growth. The Federal
Reserve, as a matter of policy, may require a bank holding company
to be well-capitalized at the time of filing an acquisition
application and upon consummation of the acquisition.
Under the BHC Act and Federal Reserve regulations, the Banks
are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in
connection with an extension of credit, lease, sale of property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
or furnishing of services. That means that, except with respect
to traditional banking products (loans, deposits or trust services),
the Banks may not condition a customers purchase of
services on the purchase of other services from any of the Banks
or other subsidiaries of the Company.
It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that the Company is
expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength
to its subsidiaries, and to commit resources to support the subsidiaries.
The Federal Reserve takes the position that in implementing
this policy, it may require the Company to provide
such support even when the Company otherwise would not
consider itself able to do so.
The Federal Reserve has adopted risk-based capital requirements
for assessing capital adequacy of all bank holding companies,
including financial holding companies. These standards
define regulatory capital and establish minimum capital ratios
in relation to assets, both on an aggregate basis and as adjusted
for credit risks and off-balance sheet exposures. Under the Federal
Reserves risk-based guidelines, capital is classified into two
categories. For bank holding companies, Tier 1 capital, or
core capital, consists of common stockholders equity, qualifying
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock including
related surplus, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock
including related surplus (subject to certain limitations),
minority interests in the common equity accounts of consolidated
subsidiaries and qualifying trust preferred securities, and
is reduced by goodwill, specified intangible assets and certain
other items (Tier 1 Capital). Tier 2 capital, or supplementary
capital, consists of the following items, all of which are
subject to certain conditions and limitations: the allowance for
credit losses; perpetual preferred stock and related surplus;
hybrid capital instruments; unrealized holding gains on marketable
equity securities; perpetual debt and mandatory convertible
debt securities; term subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock.
Under the Federal Reserves capital guidelines, bank holding
companies are required to maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying
total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, of which at
least 4.0% must be in the form of Tier 1 Capital. The Federal
Reserve also requires a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 Capital
to total assets of 3.0% for strong bank holding companies
(those rated a composite 1 under the Federal Reserves rating
system). For all other bank holding companies, the minimum
ratio of Tier 1 Capital to total assets is 4%. In addition, the
Federal Reserve continues to consider the Tier 1 leverage ratio
(Tier 1 capital to average quarterly assets) in evaluating proposals
for expansion or new activities.
In its capital adequacy guidelines, the Federal Reserve emphasizes
that the foregoing standards are supervisory minimums
and that banking organizations generally are expected to operate
well above the minimum ratios. These guidelines also provide
that banking organizations experiencing growth, whether
internally or through acquisition, are expected to maintain
strong capital positions substantially above the minimum levels.
Regulations proposed by the federal banking regulators
referred to as the Basel II and Basel IA proposals could alter the
capital adequacy frameworks for banking organizations such as
the Company.
As of December 31, 2007, the Companys total capital to riskweighted
assets ratio was 10.2%, its Tier 1 Capital to riskweighted
asset ratio was 8.7% and its leverage ratio was 7.7%.
Since the Companys bank subsidiaries include Illinois-chartered
Banks and a Wisconsin-chartered Bank, the Company is
also subject to regular examination by the Secretary of the Illinois
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the
Illinois Secretary) and the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department
of Financial Institutions (the Wisconsin Department).
Under the Illinois Banking Act, any person who acquires 25%
or more of the Companys stock may be required to obtain the
prior approval of the Illinois Secretary. Similarly, under the
Federal Change in Bank Control Act, a person must give 60
days written notice to the Federal Reserve and may be required
to obtain the prior regulatory consent of the Federal Reserve
before acquiring control of 10% or more of any class of the
Companys outstanding stock. Generally, an acquisition of
more than 10% of the Companys stock by a corporate entity,
including a corporation, partnership or trust, would require
prior Federal Reserve approval under the BHC Act.
Dividend Limitations. Because the Companys consolidated net
income consists largely of net income of the Banks and its nonbank
subsidiaries, the Companys ability to pay dividends
depends upon its receipt of dividends from these entities. Federal
and state statutes and regulations impose restrictions on the payment
of dividends by the Company, the Banks and its non-bank
subsidiaries. (See Financial Institution Regulation Generally
Dividends for further discussion of dividend limitations.)
Federal Reserve policy provides that a bank holding company
should not pay dividends unless (i) the bank holding companys
net income over the prior year is sufficient to fully fund
the dividends and (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention
appears consistent with the capital needs, asset quality and
overall financial condition of the bank holding company and
its subsidiaries. Additionally, the Federal Reserve possesses
enforcement powers over bank holding companies and their
non-bank subsidiaries to prevent or remedy actions that represent
unsafe or unsound practices or violations of applicable
statutes and regulations. Among these powers is the ability to
prohibit or limit the payment of dividends by bank holding
companies.
Illinois law also places certain limitations on the ability of the
Company to pay dividends. For example, the Company may
not pay dividends to its shareholders if, after giving effect to the
dividend, the Company would not be able to pay its debts as
they become due. Since a major potential source of the parent
companys revenue is dividends it expects to receive from the
Banks, the Companys ability to pay dividends is likely to be
dependent on the amount of dividends paid by the Banks. No
assurance can be given that the Banks will, in any circumstances,
pay dividends to the Company.
Bank Regulation
Lake Forest Bank, Hinsdale Bank, North Shore Bank, Libertyville
Bank, Northbrook Bank, Village Bank, Wheaton Bank,
State Bank of The Lakes and St. Charles Bank are Illinois-chartered
banks and as such they and their subsidiaries are subject
to supervision and examination by the Illinois Secretary. Each
of these Illinois-chartered Banks, is a member of the Federal
Reserve and, as such, is subject to additional examination by
the Federal Reserve as their primary federal regulator. Barrington
Bank, Crystal Lake Bank, Advantage Bank, Beverly Bank,
Old Plank Trail Bank and WHTC are federally-chartered and
are subject to supervision and examination by the OCC pursuant
to the National Bank Act and regulations promulgated
thereunder. Town Bank is a Wisconsin-chartered bank and a
member of the Federal Reserve, and as such is subject to supervision
by the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal
Reserve.
The deposits of the Banks are insured by the Deposit Insurance
Fund under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act, as amended (the FDIA), and the Banks are, therefore,
also subject to supervision and examination by the FDIC. The
FDIA requires that the appropriate federal regulatory authority
(the Federal Reserve in the case of Lake Forest Bank, North
Shore Bank, Hinsdale Bank, Libertyville Bank, Northbrook
Bank, Village Bank, Wheaton Bank, State Bank of The Lakes,
Town Bank and St. Charles Bank and the OCC in the case of
Barrington Bank, Crystal Lake Bank, Advantage Bank, Beverly
Bank, Old Plank Trail Bank, and WHTC) approve any merger
and/or consolidation by or with an insured bank, as well as the
establishment or relocation of any bank or branch office and
any change-in-control of an insured bank that is not subject to
review by the Federal Reserve as a holding company regulator.
The FDIA also gives the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the
other federal bank regulatory agencies power to issue cease and
desist orders against banks, holding companies or persons
regarded as institution affiliated parties. A cease and desist
order can either prohibit such entities from engaging in certain
unsafe and unsound bank activity or can require them to take
certain affirmative action. The FDIC also supervises compliance
with the provisions of federal law and regulations which,
in addition to other requirements, place restrictions on loans by
FDIC-insured banks to their directors, executive officers and
principal shareholders.
Financial Institution Regulation Generally
Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between a bank and
its holding company or other affiliates are subject to various
restrictions imposed by state and federal regulatory agencies.
Such transactions include loans and other extensions of credit,
purchases of or investments in securities and other assets, and
payments of fees or other distributions. In general, these
restrictions limit the amount of transactions between an institution
and an affiliate of such institution, as well as the aggregate
amount of transactions between an institution and all of
its affiliates, and require transactions with affiliates to be on
terms comparable to those for transactions with unaffiliated
entities. Transactions between banking affiliates may be subject
to certain exemptions under applicable federal law.
Capital Requirements. Capital requirements for the Banks generally
parallel the capital requirements previously noted for
bank holding companies. Each of the Banks is subject to applicable
capital requirements on a separate company basis. The
federal banking regulators must take prompt corrective action
with respect to FDIC-insured depository institutions that do
not meet minimum capital requirements. There are five capital
tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
As of December 31, 2007, each of the Companys
Banks was categorized as well capitalized. Because the Company
is designated as a financial holding company, each of the
Banks is required to maintain capital ratios at or above the well
capitalized levels.
Prompt Corrective Action. The FDIA requires the federal banking
regulators to take prompt corrective action with respect to
depository institutions that fall below minimum capital standards
and prohibits any depository institution from making
any capital distribution that would cause it to be undercapitalized.
Institutions that are not adequately capitalized may be
subject to a variety of supervisory actions including, but not
limited to, restrictions on growth, investments activities, capital
distributions and management fees and will be required to
submit a capital restoration plan which, to be accepted by the
regulators, must be guaranteed in part by any company having
control of the institution (such as the Company). In other
respects, the FDIA provides for enhanced supervisory authority,
including greater authority for the appointment of a conservator
or receiver for undercapitalized institutions. The capital-
based prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIA and
their implementing regulations generally apply to all FDICinsured
depository institutions. However, federal banking
agencies have indicated that, in regulating bank holding companies,
the agencies may take appropriate action at the holding
company level based on their assessment of the effectiveness of
supervisory actions imposed upon subsidiary insured depository
institutions pursuant to the prompt corrective action provisions
of the FDIA.
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Dividends. As Illinois state-chartered banks, Lake Forest Bank,
North Shore Bank, Hinsdale Bank, Libertyville Bank, Northbrook
Bank, Village Bank, Wheaton Bank, State Bank of The
Lakes and St. Charles Bank, may not pay dividends in an
amount greater than their current net profits after deducting
losses and bad debts out of undivided profits provided that its
surplus equals or exceeds its capital. For the purpose of determining
the amount of dividends that an Illinois bank may pay,
bad debts are defined as debts upon which interest is past due
and unpaid for a period of six months or more unless such
debts are well-secured and in the process of collection. As a
Wisconsin state-chartered bank, Town Bank may declare dividends
out of its undivided profits, after provision for payment
of all expenses, losses, required reserves, taxes, and interest. In
addition, if Town Banks dividends declared and paid in either
of the prior two years exceeded net income for such year, then
the bank may not declare a dividend that exceeds year-to-date
net income except with written consent of the Wisconsin Division
of Financial Institutions. Furthermore, federal regulations
also prohibit any Federal Reserve member bank, including each
of the Companys Illinois-chartered banks and Town Bank,
from declaring dividends in any calendar year in excess of its
net income for the year plus the retained net income for the
preceding two years, less any required transfers to the surplus
account unless there is approval by the Federal Reserve. Similarly,
as national associations supervised by the OCC, Barrington
Bank, Crystal Lake Bank, Beverly Bank, Advantage Bank,
Old Plank Trail Bank and WHTC may not declare dividends
in any year in excess of its net income for the year plus the
retained net income for the preceding two years, less any
required transfers to the surplus account, nor may any of them
declare a dividend in excess of undivided profits. Furthermore,
the OCC may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, prohibit
the payment of a dividend by a national bank if it determines
that such payment would constitute an unsafe or
unsound practice or if it determines that the institution is
undercapitalized.
In addition to the foregoing, the ability of the Company, the
Banks and WHTC to pay dividends may be affected by the various
minimum capital requirements and the capital and noncapital
standards established under the FDIA, as described
below. The right of the Company, its shareholders and its creditors
to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings
of its subsidiaries is further subject to the prior claims of creditors
of the respective subsidiaries.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. The FDIA requires the
federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe standards of safety
and soundness, by regulations or guidelines, relating generally
to operations and management, asset growth, asset quality,
earnings, stock valuation and compensation. The federal bank
regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing
safety and soundness standards pursuant to the FDIA. The
guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls
and information systems, informational security, internal
audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest
rate exposure, asset growth, and compensation, fees and
benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things,
appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the
risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines
prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound
practice and describe compensation as excessive when the
amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services
performed by an executive officer, employee, director or
principal shareholder. In addition, each of the Federal Reserve
and the OCC adopted regulations that authorize, but do not
require, the Federal Reserve or the OCC, as the case may be, to
order an institution that has been given notice by the Federal
Reserve or the OCC, as the case may be, that it is not satisfying
any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a
compliance plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails
to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material
respect to implement an accepted compliance plan, the Federal
Reserve or the OCC, as the case may be, must issue an order
directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order
directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized
association is subject under the prompt corrective action provisions
of the FDIA. If an institution fails to comply with such
an order, the Federal Reserve or the OCC, as the case may be,
may seek to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to
impose civil money penalties. The Federal Reserve, the OCC
and the other federal bank regulatory agencies also adopted
guidelines for asset quality and earnings standards.
A range of other provisions in the FDIA include requirements
applicable to: closure of branches; additional disclosures to
depositors with respect to terms and interest rates applicable to
deposit accounts; uniform regulations for extensions of credit
secured by real estate; restrictions on activities of and investments
by state-chartered banks; modification of accounting
standards to conform to generally accepted accounting principles
including the reporting of off-balance sheet items and supplemental
disclosure of estimated fair market value of assets
and liabilities in financial statements filed with the banking
regulators; increased penalties in making or failing to file assessment
reports with the FDIC; greater restrictions on extensions
of credit to directors, officers and principal shareholders; and
increased reporting requirements on agricultural loans and
loans to small businesses.
In addition, the federal banking agencies adopted a final rule,
which modified the risk-based capital standards, to provide for
consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital
adequacy of a bank. Under this rule, federal regulators and the
FDIC must explicitly include a banks exposure to declines in
the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates
as a factor in evaluating a banks capital adequacy. The federal
banking agencies also have adopted a joint agency policy statement
providing guidance to banks for managing interest rate
risk. The policy statement emphasizes the importance of adequate
oversight by management and a sound risk management
process. The assessment of interest rate risk management made
by the banks examiners will be incorporated into the banks
overall risk management rating and used to determine the
effectiveness of management.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Under the FDIA, as an FDICinsured
institution, each of the Banks is required to pay deposit
insurance premiums based on the risk it poses to the Deposit
Insurance Fund (DIF). The FDIC has authority to raise or
lower assessment rates on insured deposits in order to achieve
statutorily required reserve ratios in the DIF and to impose special
additional assessments. Each institutions assessment rate
depends on the capital category and supervisory category to
which it is assigned. During 2007, the Banks recognized
expense for deposit insurance premiums in the aggregate
amount of $3.7 million.
In November 2006, the FDIC adopted a new risk-based insurance
assessment system, which was effective Jan. 1, 2007,
designed to tie what banks pay for deposit insurance more
closely to the risks they pose. The FDIC also adopted a new
base schedule of rates that the FDIC can adjust up or down,
depending on the needs of the DIF, and set initial premiums
for 2007 that range from 5 cents per $100 of domestic deposits
in the lowest risk category to 43 cents per $100 of domestic
deposits for banks in the highest risk category. The assessment
rates are subject to adjustment by the FDIC. The new assessment
system has resulted in increased annual assessments on
the deposits of the Companys bank subsidiaries of 5 to 7 cents
per $100 of deposits. An FDIC credit available to the Companys
bank subsidiaries for prior contributions offset some of
the assessment increase in 2007, and is expected to offset some
of the assessments for 2008. Significant increases in the insurance
assessments of the Companys bank subsidiaries will
increase the Companys costs once the credit is fully utilized. In
addition, the Deposit Insurance Fund Act of 1996 authorizes
the Financing Corporation (FICO) to impose assessments on
DIF assessable deposits in order to service the interest on
FICOs bond obligations. The amount assessed is in addition
to the amount, if any, paid for deposit insurance under the
FDICs risk-related assessment rate schedule. FICO assessment
rates may be adjusted quarterly to reflect a change in assessment
base. The FICO annual assessment rate is approximately
1.15 cents per $100 of deposits.
Deposit insurance may be terminated by the FDIC upon a
finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound
practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue
operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule,
order or condition imposed by the FDIC. Such terminations
can only occur, if contested, following judicial review through
the federal courts. The management of each of the Banks does
not know of any practice, condition or violation that might
lead to termination of deposit insurance.
Under the cross-guarantee provision of the FDIA, as augmented
by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and
Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), insured depository
institutions such as the Banks may be liable to the FDIC with
respect to any loss or reasonably anticipated loss incurred by
the FDIC resulting from the default of, or FDIC assistance to,
any commonly controlled insured depository institution. The
Banks are commonly controlled within the meaning of the
FIRREA cross-guarantee provision.
Federal Reserve System. The Banks are subject to Federal
Reserve regulations requiring depository institutions to maintain
non-interest-earning reserves against their transaction
accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). For
2007, the first $8.5 million of otherwise reservable balances
(subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve of each Bank)
were exempt from the reserve requirements. A 3% reserve ratio
applied to balances over $8.5 million up to and including
$45.8 million and a 10% reserve ratio applied to balances in
excess of $45.8 million. The Banks were in compliance with
the applicable requirements in 2007. For 2008, the first $9.3
million of otherwise reservable balances are exempt, balances
over $9.3 million and up to $43.9 million are subject to the 3%
reserve ratio, and balances over $43.9 million are subject to the
10% reserve ratio.
Anti-Money Laundering. On October 26, 2001, the USA
PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the PATRIOT Act) was enacted into
law, amending in part the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The BSA
and the PATRIOT Act contain anti-money laundering
(AML) and financial transparency laws as well as enhanced
information collection tools and enforcement mechanics for
the U.S. government, including: standards for verifying customer
identification at account opening; rules to promote cooperation
among financial institutions, regulators, and law
enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved
in terrorism or money laundering; reports by nonfinancial entities
and businesses filed with the U.S. Department of the Treasurys
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for transactions
exceeding $10,000; and due diligence requirements for financial
institutions that administer, maintain, or manage private bank
accounts or correspondence accounts for non-U.S. persons.
Each Bank is subject to the PATRIOT Act and, therefore, is
required to provide its employees with AML training, designate
an AML compliance officer and undergo an annual, independent
audit to assess the effectiveness of its AML Program. The
Company has established policies, procedures and internal controls
that are designed to comply with these AML requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Protection of Client Information. Many aspects of the Companys
business are subject to increasingly comprehensive legal
requirements concerning the use and protection of certain
client information including those adopted pursuant to the
GLB Act as well as the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003 (the FACT Act). Provisions of the GLB Act
require a financial institution to disclose its privacy policy to
customers and consumers, and require that such customers or
consumers be given a choice (through an opt-out notice) to forbid
the sharing of nonpublic personal information about them
with certain nonaffiliated third persons. The Company and
each of the Banks have a written privacy notice that is delivered
to each of their customers when customer relationships begin,
and annually thereafter, in compliance with the GLB Act. In
accordance with that privacy notice, the Company and each
Bank protect the security of information about their customers,
educate their employees about the importance of protecting
customer privacy, and allow their customers to remove their
names from the solicitation lists they use and share with others.
The Company and each Bank require business partners with
whom they share such information to have adequate security
safeguards and to abide by the redisclosure and reuse provisions
of the GLB Act. The Company and each Bank have developed
and implemented programs to fulfill the expressed requests of
customers and consumers to opt out of information sharing
subject to the GLB Act. The federal banking regulators have
interpreted the requirements of the GLB Act to require banks
to take certain actions in the event that certain information
about customers is compromised. If the federal or state regulators
of the financial subsidiaries establish further guidelines
for addressing customer privacy issues, the Company and/or
each Bank may need to amend their privacy policies and adapt
their internal procedures. The Company and the Banks may
also be subject to additional requirements under state laws.
Moreover, like other lending institutions, each of the Banks
utilizes credit bureau data in their underwriting activities. Use
of such data is regulated under the Fair Credit Report Act (the
FCRA), including credit reporting, prescreening, sharing of
information between affiliates, and the use of credit data. The
FCRA was amended by the FACT Act in 2003, which imposes
a number of regulatory requirements, some of which have
become effective, some of which will become effective in 2008,
and some of which are still in the process of being implemented
by federal regulators. In particular, in 2008, compliance with
new rules restricting the ability of corporate affiliates to share
certain customer information for marketing purposes will
become mandatory. The Company and the Banks may also be
subject to additional requirements under state laws.
Community Reinvestment. Under the Community Reinvestment
Act (CRA), a financial institution has a continuing and
affirmative obligation, consistent with the safe and sound operation
of such institution, to help meet the credit needs of its
entire community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods.
The CRA does not establish specific lending
requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it
limit an institutions discretion to develop the types of products
and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. However, institutions are
rated on their performance in meeting the needs of their communities.
Performance is judged in three areas: (a) a lending
test, to evaluate the institutions record of making loans in its
assessment areas; (b) an investment test, to evaluate the institutions
record of investing in community development projects,
affordable housing and programs benefiting low or moderate
income individuals and business; and (c) a service test, to evaluate
the institutions delivery of services through its branches,
ATMs and other offices. The CRA requires each federal banking
agency, in connection with its examination of a financial
institution, to assess and assign one of four ratings to the institutions
record of meeting the credit needs of its community
and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain
applications by the institution, including applications for charters,
branches and other deposit facilities, relocations, mergers,
consolidations, acquisitions of assets or assumptions of liabilities,
and savings and loan holding company acquisitions. The
CRA also requires that all institutions make public disclosure
of their CRA ratings. Each of the Banks received a satisfactory
rating from the Federal Reserve, the OCC or the FDIC
on their most recent CRA performance evaluations. Because
the Company is a financial holding company, failure of any of
the Banks to maintain satisfactory CRA ratings could restrict
further expansion of the Companys or the Banks activities.
Brokered Deposits. Well capitalized institutions are not subject
to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately capitalized
institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered
deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain
restrictions on the rate paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized
institutions are not permitted to accept brokered
deposits. An adequately capitalized institution that receives a
waiver is not permitted to offer interest rates on brokered
deposits significantly exceeding the market rates in the institutions
home area or nationally, and undercapitalized institutions
may not solicit any deposits by offering such rates. Each of the
Banks is eligible to accept brokered deposits (as a result of their
capital levels) and may use this funding source from time to
time when management deems it appropriate from an asset/liability
management perspective.
Enforcement Actions. Federal and state statutes and regulations
provide financial institution regulatory agencies with great flexibility
to undertake enforcement action against an institution
that fails to comply with regulatory requirements, particularly
capital requirements. Possible enforcement actions range from
the imposition of a capital plan and capital directive to civil
money penalties, cease and desist orders, receivership, conservatorship
or the termination of deposit insurance.
Compliance with Consumer Protection Laws. The Banks are
also subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and
regulations including the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in
Savings Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Fair
Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the
Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act and the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act. WestAmerica must also comply with many of
these consumer protection statutes and regulations. Violation
of these statutes can lead to significant potential liability, in litigation
by consumers as well as enforcement actions by regulators.
Among other things, these acts:
|
|
|
require creditors to disclose credit terms in accordance
with legal requirements; |
|
|
|
|
require banks to disclose deposit account terms and
electronic fund transfer terms in accordance with
legal requirements; |
|
|
|
|
impose requirements and limitations on the users of
credit reports and those who provide information to
credit reporting agencies; |
|
|
|
|
prohibit discrimination against an applicant in any
consumer or business credit transaction; |
|
|
|
|
require banks to collect and report applicant and borrower
data regarding loans for home purchases or
improvement projects; |
|
|
|
|
require lenders to provide borrowers with information
regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements; |
|
|
|
|
prohibit certain lending practices and limit escrow
amounts with respect to real estate transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
prescribe possible penalties for violations of the
requirements of consumer protection statutes and
regulations. |
There are currently pending proposals to amend some of these
statutes and their implementing regulations, and there may be
additional proposals or final amendments in 2008 or beyond.
In addition, federal and state regulators have issued, and may in
the future issue, guidance on these requirements, or other
aspects of the Companys business. The developments may
impose additional burdens on the Company and its subsidiaries.
Broker-Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation
WHI and WHAMC are subject to extensive regulation under
federal and state securities laws. WHI is a registered as a broker-
dealer with all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Both WHI and WHAMC are registered as investment advisers
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In
addition, WHI is a member of several self-regulatory organizations
(SRO). Although WHI is required to be registered
with the SEC, much of their regulation examination has been
delegated to SROs that the SEC oversees, including the Financial
Industry Regulatory Association and the national securities
exchanges. In addition to SEC rules and regulations, the SROs
adopt rules, subject to approval of the SEC, that govern all
aspects of business in the securities industry and conduct periodic
examinations of member firms. WHI is also subject to
regulation by state securities commissions in states where they
conduct business. WHI and WHAMC are registered only
with the SEC as investment advisers, but certain of their advisory
personnel are subject to regulation by state securities commissions.
As a result of federal and state registrations and SRO memberships,
WHI is subject to over-lapping schemes of regulation
which covers all aspects of its securities businesses. Such regulations
cover, among other things, matters including minimum
net capital requirements; uses and safekeeping of clients funds;
recordkeeping and reporting requirements; supervisory and
organizational procedures intended to assure compliance with
securities laws and to prevent improper trading on material
nonpublic information; personnel-related matters, including
qualification and licensing of supervisory and sales personnel;
limitations on extensions of credit in securities transactions;
clearance and settlement procedures; suitability determinations
as to certain customer transactions, limitations on the
amounts and types of fees and commissions that may be
charged to customers, and the timing of proprietary trading in
relation to customers trades; and affiliate transactions.
WHAMC, and WHI in its capacity as an investment adviser,
are subject to regulations covering matters such as transactions
between clients, transactions between the adviser and clients,
and management of mutual funds and other client accounts.
The principal purpose of regulation and discipline of investment
firms is the protection of customers and the securities
markets rather than the protection of creditors and stockholders
of investment firms.
Monetary Policy and Economic Conditions
The earnings of banks and bank holding companies are
affected by general economic conditions and also by the credit
policies of the Federal Reserve. Through open market transactions,
variations in the discount rate and the establishment of
reserve requirements, the Federal Reserve exerts considerable
influence over the cost and availability of funds obtainable for
lending or investing.
The Federal Reserves monetary policies have affected the operating
results of all commercial banks in the past and are
expected to do so in the future. The Company and the Banks
cannot fully predict the nature or the extent of any effects
which fiscal or monetary policies may have on their business
and earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Supplemental Statistical Data
The
following statistical information is provided in accordance with the
requirements of The Exchange Act Industry Guide 3,
Statistical Disclosures by Bank Holding Companies,
which is part of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the
SEC. This data should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis which
are contained in this Annual Report.
Investment Securities Portfolio
The following table presents the carrying value of the Companys available-for-sale securities
portfolio, by investment category, as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
33,109 |
|
|
|
34,072 |
|
|
|
34,586 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
322,043 |
|
|
|
690,574 |
|
|
|
714,715 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
49,127 |
|
|
|
49,209 |
|
|
|
48,397 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
42,802 |
|
|
|
60,080 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
688,846 |
|
|
|
866,288 |
|
|
|
874,067 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB Stock and other equity securities |
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
139,493 |
|
|
|
119,261 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
1,839,716 |
|
|
|
1,799,384 |
|
|
Tables presenting the carrying amounts and gross unrealized gains and losses for securities
available-for-sale at December 31, 2007 and 2006, are included by reference to Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.
Maturities of available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2007, by maturity distribution, are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
From 1 |
|
to 10 |
|
After |
|
backed |
|
and/other |
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
to 5 years |
|
years |
|
10 years |
|
securities |
|
equities |
|
Total |
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
2,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,109 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
175,525 |
|
|
|
21,885 |
|
|
|
24,319 |
|
|
|
100,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,043 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
11,317 |
|
|
|
15,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,127 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
25,134 |
|
|
|
7,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,802 |
|
Mortgage-backed(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,846 |
|
Federal reserve/FHLB stock
and other equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
184,739 |
|
|
|
47,392 |
|
|
|
90,998 |
|
|
|
123,952 |
|
|
|
688,846 |
|
|
|
167,910 |
|
|
|
1,303,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The maturities of
mortgage-backed
securities may
differ from
contractual
maturities since
the underlying
mortgages may be
called or prepaid
without penalties.
Therefore,
these securities are not included within
the maturity categories above. |
The weighted average yield for each range of maturities of securities, on a tax-equivalent basis,
is shown below as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
From 1 |
|
to 10 |
|
After |
|
backed |
|
and/other |
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
to 5 years |
|
years |
|
10 years |
|
securities |
|
equities |
|
Total |
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
4.45 |
% |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
Municipal |
|
|
5.03 |
% |
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
6.82 |
% |
|
|
6.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
Mortgage-backed(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
Federal reserve/FHLB stock
and other equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The maturities of
mortgage-backed
securities may
differ from
contractual
maturities since
the underlying
mortgages may be
called or prepaid
without penalties.
Therefore,
these securities are not included within
the maturity categories above. |
Loan Portfolio
The following table shows the Companys loan portfolio by category as of December 31 for each of
the five previous fiscal years (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,408,661 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
4,068,437 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
3,161,734 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
2,465,852 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,648,022 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
678,298 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
666,471 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
624,337 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
574,668 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
466,812 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
226,686 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
207,059 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
275,729 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
248,118 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
173,625 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,078,185 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,165,846 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
814,681 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
770,792 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
746,895 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
241,393 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
249,534 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
203,002 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
171,926 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
174,071 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Tricom finance receivables |
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,975 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
49,453 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
29,730 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25,024 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
140,660 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
95,158 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
84,935 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
87,260 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
63,345 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
6,801,602 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
6,496,480 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5,213,871 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4,348,346 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
3,297,794 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans. The commercial loan component is comprised primarily
of commercial real estate loans, lines of credit for working capital purposes, and term loans for
the acquisition of equipment. Commercial real estate is predominantly owner occupied and secured by
a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the property. Working capital lines are generally
renewable annually and supported by business assets, personal guarantees and, oftentimes,
additional collateral. Equipment loans are generally secured by titles and/or U.C.C. filings. Also
included in this category are loans to condominium and homeowner associations originated through
Barrington Banks Community Advantage program and small aircraft financing, an earning asset niche
developed at Crystal Lake Bank. Commercial business lending is generally considered to involve a
higher degree of risk than traditional consumer bank lending. The vast majority of commercial loans
are made within the Banks immediate market areas. The increase in this loan category can be
attributed to bank acquisitions, opening of additional banking facilities, an emphasis on business
development calling programs, recruitment of additional experienced lending officers and superior
servicing of existing commercial loan customers which has increased referrals.
In addition to the home mortgages originated by the Banks, the Company participates in mortgage
warehouse lending by providing interim funding to unaffiliated mortgage brokers to finance
residential mortgages originated by such brokers for sale into the secondary market. The Companys
loans to the mortgage brokers are secured by the business assets of the mortgage companies as well
as the underlying mortgages, the majority of which are funded by the Company on a loan-by-loan
basis after they have been pre-approved for pur-
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
chase by third party end lenders who forward payment
directly to the Company upon their acceptance of final loan documentation. In addition, the Company
may also provide interim financing for packages of mortgage loans on a bulk basis in circumstances
where the mortgage brokers desire to competitively bid a number of mortgages for sale as a package
in the secondary market. Typically, the Company will serve as sole funding source for its mortgage
warehouse lending customers under short-term revolving credit agreements. Amounts advanced with
respect to any particular mortgage loan are usually required to be repaid within 21 days.
Home equity loans. The Companys home equity loan
products are generally structured as lines of credit
secured by first or second position mortgage liens on
the underlying property with loan-to-value ratios not
exceeding 85%, including prior liens, if any. The
Banks home equity loans feature competitive rate
structures and fee arrangements. In addition, the Banks
periodically offer promotional home equity loan
products as part of their marketing strategy often
featuring lower introductory rates.
Residential real estate mortgages. The residential real
estate category predominantly includes one-to-four
family adjustable rate mortgages that have repricing
terms generally from one to three years, construction
loans to individuals and bridge financing loans for
qualifying customers. The adjustable rate mortgages are
often non-agency conforming, may have terms based on
differing indexes, and relate to properties located
principally in the Chicago and southern Wisconsin
metropolitan areas or vacation homes owned by local
residents. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans decrease, but
do not eliminate, the risks associated with changes in
interest rates. Because periodic and lifetime caps
limit the interest rate adjustments, the value of
adjustable-rate mortgage loans fluctuates inversely
with changes in interest
rates. In addition, as interest rates increase, the
required payments by the borrower increases, thus
increasing the potential for default. The Company does
not generally originate loans for its own portfolio
with long-term fixed rates due to interest rate risk
considerations. Through the Banks and the Companys
WestAmerica subsidiary, the Company can accommodate
customer requests for fixed rate loans by originating
and selling these loans into the secondary market, in
connection with which the Company receives fee income,
or by selectively including certain of these loans
within the Banks own portfolios. A portion of the
loans sold by the Company into the secondary market
were sold to the Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA) with the servicing of those loans retained.
The amount of loans serviced for FNMA as of December
31, 2007 and 2006 was $488 million and $495 million,
respectively. All other mortgage loans sold into the
secondary market were sold without the retention of
servicing rights.
Premium finance receivables. The Company originates
premium finance receivables primarily through FIFC. As
previously mentioned, in November 2007, the Company
acquired Broadway, a commercial finance company that
specializes in financing insurance premiums for
corporate entities. Broadway is a subsidiary of FIFC.
Most of the receivables originated by FIFC are sold to
the Banks and retained within their loan portfolios.
FIFC began selling loans to an unrelated third party in
1999. Prior to the fourth
quarter of 2007, the Company had not sold any premium
finance receivables since the second half of 2006 as
the banks had sufficient capacity to retain all of the
originations during this period. During 2007, FIFC originated approximately $3.1
billion of loans and sold approximately $230 million of
those loans in the fourth quarter to unrelated
financial institutions. FIFC recognized gains of $2.0
million related to this activity. The sale of premium
finance receivables to unaffiliated financial
institutions is expected to continue in 2008. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the balance of these
receivables that FIFC services for others totaled
approximately $220 million and $58 million,
respectively. All premium finance receivables are
subject to the Companys stringent credit standards,
and substantially all such loans are made to commercial
customers. The Company rarely finances consumer
insurance premiums.
FIFC generally offers financing of approximately 80% of
an insurance premium primarily to commercial purchasers
of property and casualty and liability insurance who
desire to pay insurance premiums on an installment
basis. FIFC markets its financial services primarily by
establishing and maintaining
relationships with medium and large insurance agents
and brokers and by offering a high degree of service
and innovative products. Senior management is
significantly involved in FIFCs marketing efforts,
currently focused almost exclusively on commercial
accounts. Loans are originated by FIFCs own sales
force working with insurance agents and brokers
throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2007,
FIFC had the necessary licensing or other regulatory
approvals to do business in all 50 states and the
District of Columbia.
In financing insurance premiums, the Company does not
assume the risk of loss normally borne by insurance
carriers. Typically, the insured buys an insurance
policy from an independent insurance agent or broker
who offers financing through FIFC. The insured
typically makes a down payment of approximately 15% to
25% of the total premium and signs a premium finance
agreement for the balance due, which FIFC disburses
directly to the insurance carrier or its agents to
satisfy the unpaid premium amount. The initial average
balance of premium finance loans originated during 2007
was approximately $29,000 and the average term of the
agreements was approximately 10 months. As the insurer
earns the premium ratably over the life of the policy,
the unearned portion of the premium secures payment of
the balance due to FIFC by the insured. Under the terms
of the Companys standard form of financing contract,
the Company has the power to cancel the insurance
policy if there is a default in the payment on the
finance contract
and to collect the unearned portion of the premium from the insurance carrier. In the event of
cancellation of a policy, the cash returned in payment of the unearned premium by the insurer
should be sufficient to cover the loan balance and generally the interest and other charges due as
well. The major risks inherent in this type of lending are (1) the risk of fraud on the part of an
insurance agent whereby the agent fraudulently fails to forward funds to the insurance carrier or
to FIFC, as the case may be; (2) the risk that the insurance carrier becomes insolvent and is
unable to return unearned premiums related to loans in default; (3) for policies that are subject
to an audit by the insurance carrier (e.g. workers compensation policies where the insurance
carrier can audit the insured actual payroll records), the risk that the initial underwriting of
the policy was such that the premium paid by the insured is not sufficient to cover the entire
return premium in the event of default; and (4) that the borrower is unable to ultimately satisfy
the debt in the event the returned unearned premium is insufficient to retire the loan. FIFC has
established underwriting procedures to reduce the potential of loss associated with the
aforementioned risks and has systems in place to continually monitor conditions that would indicate
an increase in risk factors and to act on situations where the Companys collateral position is in jeopardy.
Indirect consumer loans. As part of its strategy to pursue specialized earning asset niches to
augment loan generation within the Banks target markets, the Company finances fixed rate
automobile loans funded indirectly through unaffiliated automobile dealers and to a lesser extent
boat loans funded through unaffiliated boat dealers, as a result of the State Bank of The Lakes
acquisition in 2005. In 2007, the Company decreased its volume of originations of auto loans as
market conditions worsened, and expects the portfolio to remain stable based on existing market
conditions. Indirect automobile loans are secured by new and used automobiles and are generated by
a large network of automobile dealers located in the Chicago area with which the Company has
established relationships. These credits generally have an average initial balance of approximately
$21,500 and have an original maturity of 60 months with the average actual maturity, as a result of
prepayments, estimated to be approximately 40-45 months. The Company does not currently originate
any significant level of sub-prime loans, which are made to individuals with impaired credit
histories at generally higher interest rates, and accordingly, with higher levels of credit risk.
The risk associated with the Companys portfolios is diversified among many individual borrowers.
Management continually monitors the dealer relationships and the Banks are not dependent on any one
dealer as a source of such loans. Like other consumer loans, the indirect consumer loans are
subject to the Banks stringent credit standards.
Tricom finance receivables. Tricom finance receivables represent high-yielding short-term accounts
receivable financing to clients in the temporary staffing industry located throughout the United
States. The clients working capital needs arise primarily from the timing differences between
weekly payroll funding and monthly collections from customers. The primary security for Tricoms
finance receivables are the accounts receivable of its clients and personal guarantees. Tricom
generally advances 80-95% based on various factors including the clients financial condition, the
length of client relationship and the nature of the clients customer business lines. Typically,
Tricom will also provide value-added out-sourced administrative services to many of these clients,
such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, which generates
additional fee income.
Consumer and Other. Included in the consumer and other loan category is a wide variety of personal
and consumer loans to individuals. The Banks originate consumer loans in order to provide a wider
range of financial services to their customers. Consumer loans generally have shorter terms and
higher interest rates than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit risk than mortgage
loans due to the type and nature of the collateral.
The Company had no loans to businesses or governments of foreign countries at any time during 2007.
Maturities
and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes In Interest Rates
The following table classifies the commercial loan portfolios at December 31, 2007 by date at which
the loans reprice (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
From one |
|
|
From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or less |
|
|
to five years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
commercial real
estate loans |
|
$ |
1,960,166 |
|
|
|
2,148,655 |
|
|
|
299,840 |
|
|
|
4,408,661 |
|
Premium finance
receivables, net of
unearned income |
|
|
1,078,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078,185 |
|
Tricom finance
receivables |
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
Of those loans repricing after one year, approximately $1.8 billion have fixed rates.
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in Wintrusts common stock is subject to risks inherent to Wintrusts business. The
material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect Wintrust are described below.
Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties
described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in
this report. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or
that management currently deems immaterial may also impair Wintrusts business operations. This
report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually
occur, Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. If this were to happen, the value of Wintrusts common stock could decline significantly,
and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The financial services industry is very competitive.
We face competition in attracting and retaining deposits, making loans, and providing
other financial services (including wealth management services) throughout our market area. Our
competitors include other community banks, larger banking institutions, and a wide range of other
financial institutions such as credit unions, government-sponsored enterprises,
mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other nonbank businesses. Many of these competitors
have substantially greater resources. If we are unable to compete effectively, we
will lose market share and income from deposits, loans, and other products may be reduced. The
financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative,
regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and
insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer
virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance
(both agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry
and made it possible for nonbanks to offer products and services traditionally provided by
banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Wintrusts ability to compete
successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
|
|
the ability to develop, maintain and build upon longterm customer relationships based on top
quality service and high ethical standards; |
|
|
|
|
|
the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands; |
|
|
|
|
|
the rate at which the Company introduces new products and services relative to its competitors; |
|
|
|
|
|
customer satisfaction with the Companys level of service; and |
|
|
|
|
|
industry and general economic trends. |
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly
weaken the Companys competitive position, which could
adversely affect the Companys growth and profitability, which,
in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrust may be adversely affected by interest rate changes.
Wintrusts interest income and interest expense are affected by general economic conditions and by
the policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve.
Changes in interest rates may influence the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of the
loan portfolio, loan and deposit pricing, the volume of loan originations in Wintrusts mortgage
banking business and the value that Wintrust can recognize on the sale of mortgage loans in the
secondary market. Wintrust expects the results of its mortgage banking business in selling loans
into the secondary market will be negatively impacted during periods of rising interest rates.
With the relatively low interest rates that prevailed from 2002 through 2005, Wintrust had been
able to augment the total return of its investment securities portfolio by selling call options on
fixed-income securities it owns. However, as a result of rising interest rates, Wintrusts ability
to engage in such transactions has been greatly limited. During 2007 and 2006, Wintrust recorded
fee income of approximately $2.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, from premiums earned on
these option transactions, compared to approximately $11.4 million in 2005. Wintrusts
opportunities to sell covered call options may be limited in the future if rates rise. The loss of
such premium income or changes in the growth rate, quality and pricing of Wintrusts loan and
deposit portfolio caused by changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on
Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrust is subject to lending risk.
There are inherent risks associated with the Companys lending activities. Increases in interest
rates and/or weakening economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of borrowers
to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans. A significant
portion of the Companys loan portfolio consisted of commercial and commercial real estate loans.
These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real
estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential
real estate loans and consumer loans. Because the Companys loan portfolio contains a significant
number of commercial and commercial real estate loans, the deterioration of these loans could cause
a significant increase in non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in
a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for credit losses and an
increase in loan charge-
offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and
results of operations.
Wintrusts allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses that may occur in its loan portfolio.
Wintrusts allowance for loan losses is established in consultation with management of its
operating subsidiaries and is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to absorb
loan losses that are inherent in the portfolios. At December 31, 2007, Wintrusts allowance for
loan losses was 70.1% of total nonperforming loans and 0.74% of total loans. The amount of future
losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in
interest rates that may be beyond its control, and such losses may exceed current estimates.
Estimating loan loss allowances for Wintrusts newer banks is more difficult because rapidly
growing and de novo bank loan portfolios are, by their nature, unseasoned. Therefore, the Banks may
be more susceptible to changes in estimates, and to losses exceeding estimates, than banks with
more seasoned loan portfolios. There can be no assurance that the allowance for loan losses will
prove sufficient to cover actual loan or lease losses in the future, which could result in a material adverse effect on Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations.
De novo operations and branch openings impact Wintrusts profitability.
Wintrusts financial results have been and will continue to be impacted by its strategy of de novo
bank formations and branch openings. Wintrust expects to undertake additional de novo
bank formations or branch openings. Based on Wintrusts experience, its management believes that it
generally takes from 13 to 24 months for de novo banks to first achieve operational profitability,
depending on the number of banking facilities opened, the impact of organizational and overhead
expenses, the start-up phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically
involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning
assets. However, it may take longer than expected or than the amount of time Wintrust
has historically experienced for new banks and/or banking facilities to reach profitability, and
there can be no guarantee that these new banks or branches will ever be profitable. To the
extent Wintrust undertakes additional de novo bank, branch and business formations, its level of
reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets will be impacted
by start-up costs associated with such operations, and it is likely to continue to experience the
effects of higher expenses relative to operating income from the new operations. These expenses
may be higher than Wintrust expected or than its experience has shown, which could have a material
adverse effect on Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrusts premium finance business involves unique operational risks and could expose it to significant losses.
Of Wintrusts total loans at December 31, 2007, 16%, or
approximately $1.1 billion, were comprised of commercial insurance premium finance receivables that
it generates through FIFC and Broadway. These loans involve a different, and possibly higher, level
of risk of delinquency or collection than generally associated with loan portfolios of more
traditional community banks because Wintrust conducts lending in this segment primarily through
relationships with a large number of unaffiliated insurance agents and because the borrowers are
located nationwide. FIFC and Broadway also face unique operational and internal control challenges
due to the relatively rapid turnover of the premium finance loan portfolio and high volume of new
loan originations. As a result, risk management and general supervisory oversight may be more
difficult than in the Banks. FIFC and Broadway may also be more susceptible to third party fraud.
Acts of fraud are difficult to detect and deter, and Wintrust cannot assure investors that its risk management procedures and controls will prevent losses from
fraudulent activity. For example, in the third quarter of 2000, FIFC recorded a non-recurring
after-tax charge of $2.6 million in connection with a series of fraudulent loan transactions
perpetrated against FIFC by one independent insurance agency located in Florida. Although Wintrust
has since enhanced its internal controls system at FIFC, it may continue to be exposed to the risk
of significant loss in its premium finance business, which could result in a material adverse
effect on Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, to the extent
that affiliates of insurance carriers, banks, and other lending institutions add greater service
and flexibility to their financing practices in the future, the Companys operations could be adversely affected. There can
be no assurance that FIFC and Broadway will be able to continue to compete successfully
in its markets.
Wintrust may not be able to obtain liquidity and income from the sale of premium finance receivables in the future.
Wintrust has sold some of the loans FIFC originates to unrelated third parties. Wintrust recognized
gains on the sales of these receivables, and the proceeds of such sales have provided Wintrust with
additional liquidity. However, Wintrust did not sell any of these loans in the second half of 2006
or the first three quarters of 2007 due to capacity to retain such loans with
the Banks. In the fourth quarter of 2007, Wintrust sold $230 million of premium finance receivables
to unrelated third parties. Consistent with its strategy to be asset driven, Wintrust
may pursue similar sales of premium finance receivables in the future; however, it cannot assure
you that there will continue to be a market for the sale of these loans and the extent of
Wintrusts future sales of these loans will depend on the level of new volume growth in relation to its
capacity to maintain the loans
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
within the Banks loan portfolios. Because Wintrust has a recourse obligation to the purchaser of
premium finance loans that it sells, it could incur losses in connection with the loans sold if
collections on the underlying loans prove to be insufficient to repay to the purchaser the
principal amount of the loans sold plus interest at the negotiated buy-rate and if the collection
shortfall on the loans sold exceeds Wintrusts estimate of losses at the time of sale. An inability
to sell premium finance receivables in the future or the failure of collections on the underlying
loans to be sufficient to repay the principal amount of such loans could result in a material
adverse effect on Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrust historically has engaged in numerous acquisitions. Wintrust may not be able to
continue to implement such an acquisition strategy in the future and there are risks
associated with such acquisitions.
In the past several years, Wintrust has completed numerous acquisitions of banks and other
financial service related companies and may continue to make such acquisitions in the
future. Wintrust seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar and have
experienced management and possess either significant market presence or have potential for
improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale or expanded services.
Failure to successfully identify and complete acquisitions likely will result in Wintrust
achieving slower growth. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves various risks
commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things:
|
|
potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities or asset quality issues of the target company; |
|
|
|
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target company; |
|
|
|
potential disruption to Wintrusts business, including diversion of Wintrusts managements time and attention; |
|
|
|
the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company; |
|
|
|
difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; and |
|
|
|
potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company. |
Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over
book and market values, and, therefore, some dilution of Wintrusts tangible book value and net
income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction. Furthermore, failure
to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product
presence, and/or other projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect
on Wintrusts financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrust is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive federal
and state regulation and supervision. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their
supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our
operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for
loan losses. These regulations affect the Companys lending practices, capital structure,
investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Changes to statutes,
regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of
statutes, regulations or policies, could affect Wintrust in substantial and unpredictable ways.
Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory
agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations. See the
section captioned Supervision and Regulation in Item 1. Business for additional information.
Wintrusts profitability depends significantly on economic conditions in the state of Illinois.
Wintrusts success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the State of Illinois
and the specific local markets in which the Company operates. Unlike larger national or
other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, Wintrust provides banking and
financial services to customers primarily in the greater Chicago and southeast Wisconsin
metropolitan areas. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the
demand for Wintrusts products and services as well as the ability of Wintrusts customers
to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of Wintrusts deposit
funding sources. A significant decline in economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession,
acts of terrorism, outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences,
unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors with impact on these local markets
could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Wintrust relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its revenue.
Wintrust is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries.
It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends
from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal
source of funds to pay dividends on the Companys common
stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and
state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the
Banks and certain non-bank subsidiaries may pay to Wintrust.
In the event that the Banks are unable to pay dividends to Wintrust,
it may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay
dividends on the Companys common stock. The inability to
receive dividends from the Banks could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, financial condition and
results of operations. See the section captioned Supervision and
Regulation in Item 1. Business for more information.
Wintrusts information systems may experience an
interruption or breach in security.
Wintrust relies heavily on communications and information
systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption, or
breach in security of these systems could result in failures or
disruptions in customer relationship management, general
ledger, deposit, loan or other systems. While Wintrust has policies
and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of
such a failure, interruption, or security breach of its information
systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures,
interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do
occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence
of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of our information
systems could damage Wintrusts reputation, result in a
loss of customer business, subject Wintrust to additional regulatory
scrutiny or civil litigation and possible financial liability,
any of which could have a material and adverse effect on Wintrusts
financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrust may issue additional securities, which
could dilute the ownership percentage of
holders of Wintrusts common stock.
The Company may issue additional securities to raise additional
capital or finance acquisitions or upon the exercise or
conversion of outstanding equity awards, and if it does, the
ownership percentage of holders of our common stock could
be diluted.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to
complete their financial transactions.
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete
financial transactions that historically have involved banks
through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now
maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank
deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers
can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring
funds directly without the assistance of banks. The
process of eliminating banks as intermediaries could result in
the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits
and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss
of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source
of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition and results of operations.
Wintrusts future success depends, in part, on its
ability to attract and retain experienced and
qualified personnel.
Wintrust believes that its future success depends, in part, on its
ability to attract and retain experienced personnel, including its
senior management and other key personnel. The loss of any of
its senior managers or other key personnel, or its inability to
identify, recruit and retain such personnel, could materially and
adversely affect Wintrusts business, operating results and
financial condition.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Companys executive offices are located in the banking
facilities of Lake Forest Bank. Certain corporate functions are
also located at the various Bank subsidiaries.
The Companys Banks operate through 77 banking facilities,
the majority of which are owned. The Company owns 110
Automatic Teller Machines, the majority of which are housed
at banking locations. The banking facilities are located in communities
throughout the Chicago metropolitan area and southern
Wisconsin. The Banks also own two locations that are used
as operations centers. Excess space in certain properties is leased
to third parties.
WHI has two locations, one in downtown Chicago and one in
Appleton, Wisconsin, both of which are leased, as well as office
locations at various Banks. WestAmerica has 18 locations in 9
states, all of which are leased, as well as office locations at various Banks. FIFC and Tricom each
has one location, both of which are owned. WITS has one
location which is owned and one which is leased. Broadway
has one location in New York, which is leased. In addition, the
Company owns other real estate acquired for further expansion
that, when considered in the aggregate, is not material to the
Companys financial position.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and its subsidiaries, from time to time, are
subject to pending and threatened legal action and proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business. Any such litigation
currently pending against the Company or its
subsidiaries is incidental to the Companys business and,
based on information currently available to management,
management believes the outcome of such actions or proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on the operations
or financial position of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF
SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2007.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
The Companys common stock is traded on The Nasdaq
Stock Market under the symbol WTFC. The following table
sets forth the high and low sales prices reported on Nasdaq
for the common stock by fiscal quarter during 2007 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
45.51 |
|
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
$ |
50.29 |
|
|
$ |
45.08 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
45.78 |
|
|
|
37.65 |
|
|
|
51.90 |
|
|
|
46.14 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
46.97 |
|
|
|
42.89 |
|
|
|
59.64 |
|
|
|
49.08 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|
42.02 |
|
|
|
58.94 |
|
|
|
49.79 |
|
|
Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the five-year percentage
change in the Companys cumulative shareholder
return on common stock compared with the cumulative total
return on composites of (1) all Nasdaq National Market stocks
for United States companies (broad market index) and (2) all
Nasdaq National Market bank stocks (peer group index).
Cumulative total return is computed by dividing the sum of
the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement
period and the difference between the Companys share price at
the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the
share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The
Nasdaq National Market for United States companies index
comprises all domestic common shares traded on the Nasdaq
National Market and the Nasdaq Small-Cap Market. The Nasdaq
National Market bank stocks index comprises all banks
traded on the Nasdaq National Market and the Nasdaq Small-
Cap Market.
This graph and other information furnished in the section
titled Performance Graph under this Part II, Item 5 of this
Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be soliciting materials or
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or
subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
144.52 |
|
|
|
183.04 |
|
|
|
177.27 |
|
|
|
156.26 |
|
|
|
109.82 |
|
Nasdaq Total US |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
149.52 |
|
|
|
162.72 |
|
|
|
166.18 |
|
|
|
182.57 |
|
|
|
197.98 |
|
Nasdaq Bank Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
128.64 |
|
|
|
147.22 |
|
|
|
143.82 |
|
|
|
161.41 |
|
|
|
127.92 |
|
|
Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders
As of
February 25, 2008 there were approximately 1,636
shareholders of record of the Companys common stock.
Dividends on Common Stock
The Companys Board of Directors approved the first semiannual
cash dividend on its common stock in January 2000
and has continued to approve a semi-annual dividend since
that time.
Following is a summary of the cash dividends paid in 2006 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date |
|
Payable Date |
|
Dividend per Share |
February 9, 2006 |
|
February 23, 2006 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
August 24, 2006 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
February 8, 2007 |
|
February 22, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
August 9, 2007 |
|
August 23, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
In January 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved
a 12.5% increase in its semi-annual dividend to $0.18 per
share. The dividend was paid on February 21, 2008 to shareholders
of record as of February 7, 2008.
The final determination of timing, amount and payment of
dividends is at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors
and will depend upon the Companys earnings, financial
condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors.
Additionally, the payment of dividends is also subject to statutory
restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the
Companys Trust Preferred Securities offerings and under certain
financial covenants in the Companys revolving line of
credit.
Because the Companys consolidated net income consists
largely of net income of the Banks, WestAmerica, FIFC, Broadway,
Tricom, WHTC and the Wayne Hummer Companies, the
Companys ability to pay dividends depends upon its receipt of
dividends from these entities. The Banks ability to pay dividends
is regulated by banking statutes. See Financial Institution
Regulation Generally Dividends on page 106 of this
Form 10-K. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Banks paid
$105.9 million, $76.8 million and $45.1 million, respectively,
in dividends to the Company. De novo banks are prohibited
from paying dividends during their first three years of operations.
As of January 1, 2008, Old Plank Trail Bank, which
began operations in March 2006, was subject to this additional
dividend restriction. The de novo period for Old Plank Trail
Bank will end in March 2009.
Reference is made to Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in
this Annual Report for a description of the restrictions on the
ability of certain subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company
in the form of dividends.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 30, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an
additional 1.0 million shares of its outstanding
common stock over the next 12 months. This repurchase authorization replaced the 2.0 million share
repurchase authorization
that was announced in July 2006. Following is a summary of the stock repurchases made during the
fourth quarter of 2007:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
the Plans |
|
Period |
|
of Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
October 1 October 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
November 1 November 30 |
|
|
422,059 |
|
|
$ |
34.25 |
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 1 December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
422,059 |
|
|
$ |
34.25 |
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All shares repurchased were made in open market trades except for 1,059 shares which were
repurchased in connection with the issuance of shares pursuant to the Companys Stock Incentive
Plan.
On January 24, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the Company to repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of its outstanding common stock over the
next 12 months.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Certain
information required in response to this item is contained in this
Annual Report under the caption Selected Financial
Highlights which appears on page 3 of this Annual Report .
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
information required in response to this item is contained in this
Annual Report under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
which appears on pages 24-57 of this Annual Report.
This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in this
Annual Report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Certain information required in response to this item is contained in this
Annual Report under the caption Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Asset-Liability Management, which appears on pages 52-54 of
this Annual Report. That information should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this
Annual Report.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required in response to this item is contained in this
Annual Report under the caption Consolidated Financial
Statements, which is included on pages 58-94 of this Annual
Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The Company made no changes in or had any disagreements with its independent accountants during the
two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management of the Company, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective, in ensuring the information relating to the Company (and
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or
submits under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
Managements responsibilities relating to establishing and maintaining effective disclosure
controls and procedures include establishing and maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As disclosed in the Report on
Managements Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting, on page 95 of this
Annual Report, management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of the Companys system of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, in relation to criteria for the effective internal
control over financial reporting as described in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment,
management believes that, as of December 31, 2007, the Companys system of internal control over
financial reporting met those criteria and is effective.
The Companys assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page 96 of this Annual Report.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Companys Proxy
Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 22, 2008 (the Proxy Statement)
under the captions Election of Directors, Executive Officers of the Company, Board of
Directors Committees and Governance and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Corporate Code of Ethics which complies with the rules of the SEC and the
listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market. The code applies to all of the Companys
directors, officers and employees and is included as Exhibit 14.1 and posted on the Companys
website (www.wintrust.com). The Company will post on its website any amendments to, or waivers
from, its Corporate Code of Ethics as the code applies to its directors or executive officers.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Companys Proxy
Statement under the caption Executive Compensation, Director Compensation and Compensation
Committee Report and is incorporated herein by reference. The information included under the
heading Compensation Committee Report in the Proxy Statement shall not be deemed soliciting
materials or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A
or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the section Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,
Directors and Management that will be included in the Companys Proxy Statement.
The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2007, relating to the Companys
equity compensation plans pursuant to which common stock is authorized for issuance:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available |
|
|
issued upon |
|
Weighted-average |
|
for future issuance |
|
|
exercise of |
|
exercise price of |
|
under equity compensation |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
outstanding options, |
|
plans (excluding securities |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
warrants and rights |
|
reflected in column (a)) |
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTFC 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended |
|
|
2,465,723 |
|
|
$ |
32.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
WTFC 2007 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
223,953 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
|
274,337 |
|
WTFC Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,651 |
|
WTFC Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689,676 |
|
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
|
576,772 |
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,689,676 |
|
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
|
576,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes 124,132 shares of the Companys common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of
options previously granted under the plans of Advantage National Bancorp, Inc., Village
Bancorp, Inc., Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., First Northwest
Bancorp, Inc. and Hinsbrook Bancshares, Inc. The weighted average exercise price of those
options is $24.92. No additional awards will be made under these plans. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Companys Proxy
Statement under the sub-caption Related Party Transactions and is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Companys Proxy
Statement under the caption Audit and Non-Audit Fees Paid and is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) |
|
Documents filed as part of this Report. |
|
|
|
Financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. |
|
|
|
3. Exhibits (Exhibits marked with a * denote management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements) |
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Wintrust Financial
Corporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006). |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Wintrust Financial Corporation, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008). |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of
the Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total
amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Corporation
hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the Commission upon
request. |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of August 2, 2005, between Wintrust
Financial Corporation and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005). |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2005, among
Wintrust Financial Corporation, as depositor, Wilmington Trust Company, as property
trustee and Delaware trustee, and the Administrative Trustees listed therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005). |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2005, between Wintrust Financial
Corporation, as Guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005). |
|
|
10.4 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2005, among Wintrust Financial
Corporation, the various financial institutions party thereto and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 15, 2005). |
|
|
10.5 |
|
$25 million Subordinated Note between Wintrust Financial Corporation and
LaSalle Bank National Association, dated October 29, 2002 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.9 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002). |
|
|
10.6 |
|
Amendment and Allonge made as of June 7, 2005 to that certain $25 million
Subordinated Note dated October 29, 2002 executed by Wintrust Financial Corporation in
favor of LaSalle Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
5, 2005). |
|
|
10.7 |
|
$25 million Subordinated Note between Wintrust Financial Corporation and
LaSalle Bank National Association, dated April 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003). |
|
|
10.8 |
|
Amendment and Allonge made as of June 7, 2005 to that certain $25 million
Subordinated Note dated April 30, 2003 executed by Wintrust Financial Corporation in
favor of LaSalle Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
5, 2005). |
|
|
10.9 |
|
$25.0 million Subordinated Note between Wintrust Financial Corporation and
LaSalle Bank, National Association, dated October 25, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 28, 2005). |
|
|
10.10 |
|
Amended and Restated $1.0 million Note between Wintrust Financial
Corporation and LaSalle Bank, National Association, dated as of May 29, 2005, executed
August 26, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Companys Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending September 30, 2005). |
|
|
10.11 |
|
Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of May 29, 2005,
executed August 26, 2005, between Wintrust Financial Corporation and LaSalle Bank,
National Association (incorporation |
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporated |
|
|
|
by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Companys Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005).
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
Amended and Restated Collateral Safekeeping Agreement dated as of May
29, 2005, executed August 26, 2005, among Wintrust Financial Corporation, LaSalle
Bank, National Association and Standard Federal Bank, N.A. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
September 30, 2005). |
|
|
10.13 |
|
Amended and Restated Confirmation, dated as of December 14, 2005, between
Wintrust Financial Corporation and RBC Capital Markets Corporation as agent for Royal
Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2005). |
|
|
10.14 |
|
Indenture dated as of September 1, 2006, between Wintrust Financial
Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on September 6, 2006). |
|
|
10.15 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of September 1, 2006,
among Wintrust Financial Corporation, as depositor, LaSalle Bank National Association,
as institutional trustee, Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware trustee, and
the Administrators listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 6, 2006). |
|
|
10.16 |
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, between Wintrust Financial Corporation,
as Guarantor, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 6,
2006). |
|
|
10.17 |
|
Fourth Amendment dated March 9, 2007, to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005, among
Wintrust Financial Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association in its individual capacity
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2007). |
|
|
10.18 |
|
Form of Wintrust Financial Corporation Warrant Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 1 to Registrants Form S 4 Registration Statement (No. 333-4645),
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1996).* |
|
|
10.19 |
|
Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and Edward J. Wehmer, President and
Chief Executive Officer, dated January 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January
30, 2008).* |
|
|
10.20 |
|
Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and David A. Dykstra, Senior Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, dated January 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 30, 2008).* |
|
|
10.21 |
|
Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and Richard B. Murphy, Executive Vice
President and Chief Credit Officer, dated January 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on January 30, 2008).* |
|
|
10.22 |
|
Form of Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and David L. Stoehr, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Company entered into an Employment Agreement with
Robert F. Key, Executive Vice President/Marketing, during 2005 in substantially identical form to
this exhibit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2004).* |
|
|
10.23 |
|
Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and Thomas P. Zidar, dated June 6, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2006).* |
|
|
10.24 |
|
Employment Agreement entered into between Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company and Randolph M.
Hibben, dated March 25, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Companys Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006).* |
|
|
10.25 |
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix A of the Proxy Statement relating to the May 22, 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
the Company).* |
|
|
10.26 |
|
First Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by |
|
|
|
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).* |
|
|
10.27 |
|
Second Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the
Board of Directors on January 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Form S-8 filed
July 1, 2004.).* |
|
|
10.28 |
|
Third Amendment to Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the
Board of Directors on May 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Form S-8 filed
July 1, 2004.).* |
|
|
10.29 |
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 16,
2007).* |
|
|
10.30 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of
the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004).* |
|
|
10.31 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004).* |
|
|
10.32 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Companys 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2006).* |
|
|
10.33 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award under the Companys 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006).* |
|
|
10.34 |
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B of the Proxy Statement relating to the May 22, 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
the Company).* |
|
|
10.35 |
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement relating to the May 24, 2001 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company).* |
|
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
14.1 |
|
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Companys Form 10-K for the
year ending December 31, 2005) |
|
|
21.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
99.1 |
|
First Amendment dated as of June 1, 2006, to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005,
among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the various financial institutions party thereto and LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of
the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006). |
|
|
99.2 |
|
Second Amendment dated as of August 1, 2006, to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005,
among Wintrust Financial Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association, in its individual
capacity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2006). |
|
|
99.3 |
|
Third Amendment dated as of January 1, 2007, to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005,
among Wintrust Financial Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association, in its individual
capacity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2006). |
|
|
99.4 |
|
Fifth Amendment dated June 1, 2007, to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1,
2005, among Wintrust Financial Corporation and LaSalle Bank National Association in its
individual capacity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
Wintrust
Financial Corporation |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Wehmer
|
|
/s/ EDWARD J. WEHMER
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David L. Stoehr
|
|
/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
John S. Lillard
|
|
/s/ JOHN S. LILLARD
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Wehmer
|
|
/s/ EDWARD J. WEHMER
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and CEO and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan E. Bulley, Jr.
|
|
/s/ ALLAN E. BULLEY, JR.
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter D. Crist
|
|
/s/ PETER D. CRIST
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce K. Crowther
|
|
/s/ BRUCE K. CROWTHER
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph F. Damico
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH F. DAMICO
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bert A. Getz, Jr.
|
|
/s/ BERT A. GETZ, JR.
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles H. James III
|
|
/s/ CHARLES H. JAMES III
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albin F. Moschner
|
|
/s/ ALBIN F. MOSCHNER
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Neis
|
|
/s/ THOMAS J. NEIS
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hollis W. Rademacher
|
|
/s/ HOLLIS W. RADEMACHER
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN J. SCHORNACK
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ INGRID S. STAFFORD
|
|
February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
Corporate Locations
Corporate Headquarters
Wintrust Financial Corporation
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-615-4096
Illinois Banking Locations
ALGONQUIN
Algonquin Bank & Trust
4049 W. Algonquin Rd.
Algonquin, IL 60102
847-669-7500
ANTIOCH
State Bank of The Lakes
440 Lake St.
Antioch, IL 60002
847-395-2700
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
Village Bank & Trust
234 W. Northwest Hwy.
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
847-670-1000
Village Bank & Trust
150 E. Rand Rd.
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
847-870-5000
Village Bank & Trust
311 S. Arlington Heights Rd.
Arlington Heights, IL 60005
847-483-6000
Village Bank & Trust
1845 E. Rand Rd.
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
847-483-6000
BARRINGTON
Barrington Bank & Trust Company
201 S. Hough St.
Barrington, IL 60010
847-842-4500
Barrington Bank & Trust Company
233 W. Northwest Hwy.
Barrington, IL 60010
847-381-1715
BLOOMINGDALE
Old Town Bank & Trust of Bloomingdale
165 W. Lake St.
Bloomingdale, IL 60108
630-295-9111
BUFFALO GROVE
Buffalo Grove Bank & Trust
200 N. Buffalo Grove Rd.
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
847-634-8400
CARY
Cary Bank & Trust
60 E. Main St.
Cary, IL 60013
847-462-8881
CHICAGO
Beverly Bank & Trust Company
10258 S. Western Ave.
Chicago, IL 60643
773-239-2265
Beverly Bank & Trust Company
1908 W. 103rd St.
Chicago, IL 60643
773-239-2265
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
4343 W. Peterson Ave.
Chicago, IL 60646
773-545-5700
CLARENDON HILLS
Clarendon Hills Bank
200 W. Burlington Ave.
Clarendon Hills, IL 60514
630-323-1240
CRYSTAL LAKE
Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company
70 N. Williams St.
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
815-479-5200
Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company
27 N. Main St.
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company
1000 McHenry Ave.
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
815-479-5715
DARIEN
Hinsbrook Bank & Trust
6700 S. Route 83
Darien, IL 60561
DEERFIELD
Deerfield Bank & Trust
660 Deerfield Rd.
Deerfield, IL 60015
847-945-8660
DOWNERS GROVE
Community Bank of Downers Grove
1111 Warren Ave.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
630-968-4700
Community Bank of Downers Grove
718 Ogden Ave.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
630-435-3600
ELK GROVE VILLAGE
Elk Grove Village Bank & Trust
75 E. Turner Ave.
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
847-364-0100
FRANKFORT
Old Plank Trail Community Bank
37 Old Frankfort Way
Frankfort, IL 60423
815-464-6888
GENEVA
St. Charles Bank & Trust Company
2401 Kaneville Rd.
Geneva, IL 60134
630-845-4800
GLEN ELLYN
Glen Ellyn Bank & Trust
500 Roosevelt Rd.
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
630-469-3000
GLENCOE
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
362 Park Ave.
Glencoe, IL 60022
847-835-1700
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
633 Vernon Ave.
Glencoe, IL 60022
GRAYSLAKE
State Bank of The Lakes
50 Commerce Dr.
Grayslake, IL 60030
847-548-2700
GURNEE
Gurnee Community Bank
675 N. OPlaine Rd.
Gurnee, IL 60031
847-625-3800
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
HIGHLAND PARK
Highland Park Bank & Trust
1949 St. Johns Ave.
Highland Park, IL 60035
847-432-9988
Highland Park Bank & Trust
643 Roger Williams Ave.
Highland Park, IL 60035
847-266-0300
HIGHWOOD
Bank of Highwood Fort Sheridan
507 Sheridan Rd.
Highwood, IL 60040
847-266-7600
HINSDALE
Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company
25 E. First St.
Hinsdale, IL 60521
630-323-4404
Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company
130 W. Chestnut
Hinsdale, IL 60521
630-655-8025
HOFFMAN ESTATES
Hoffman Estates Community Bank
1375 Palatine Rd.
Hoffman Estates, IL 60192
847-963-9500
Hoffman Estates Community Bank
2497 W. Golf Rd.
Hoffman Estates, IL 60169
847-884-0500
ISLAND LAKE
Island Lake Community Bank
229 E. State Rd.
Island Lake, IL 60042
847-487-3777
LAKE BLUFF
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company
103 E. Scranton Ave.
Lake Bluff, IL 60044
847-615-4060
LAKE FOREST
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company
727 N. Bank Ln.
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-234-2882
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company
780 N. Bank Ln.
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-615-4022
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company
911 S. Telegraph Rd.
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-615-4098
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company
810 S. Waukegan Rd.
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-615-4080
LAKE VILLA
Lake Villa Community Bank
345 S. Milwaukee Ave.
Lake Villa, IL 60046
847-265-0300
LIBERTYVILLE
Libertyville Bank & Trust Company
507 N. Milwaukee Ave.
Libertyville, IL 60048
847-367-6800
Libertyville Bank & Trust Company
201 E. Hurlburt Court
Libertyville, IL 60048
847-247-4045
Libertyville Bank & Trust Company
1200 S. Milwaukee Ave.
Libertyville, IL 60048
847-367-6800
LINDENHURST
State Bank of The Lakes
2031 Grand Ave.
Lindenhurst, IL 60046
847-356-5700
McHENRY
McHenry Bank & Trust
2205 N. Richmond Rd.
McHenry, IL 60050
815-344-6600
State
Bank of The Lakes
2730 W. Route 120
McHenry, IL 60050
815-344-5100
MOKENA
Old Plank Trail Community Bank
20012 Wolf Rd.
Mokena, IL 60448
708-478-4447
MUNDELEIN
Mundelein Community Bank
1110 W. Maple Ave.
Mundelein, IL 60060
847-837-1110
NEW LENOX
Old Plank Trail Community Bank
280 Veterans Pkwy.
New Lenox, IL 60451
815-485-0001
NORTH CHICAGO
North Chicago Community Bank
1801 Sheridan Rd.
North Chicago, IL 60064
847-473-3006
NORTHBROOK
Northbrook Bank & Trust Company
1100 Waukegan Rd.
Northbrook, IL 60062
847-418-2800
Northbrook Bank & Trust Company
875 Sanders Rd.
Northbrook, IL 60062
847-418-2850
NORTHFIELD
Northview Bank & Trust
245 Waukegan Rd.
Northfield, IL 60093
847-446-0245
Northview Bank & Trust
1751 Orchard Ln.
Northfield, IL 60093
847-441-1751
PALATINE
Palatine Bank & Trust
110 W. Palatine Rd.
Palatine, IL 60067
847-963-0047
RIVERSIDE
Riverside Bank
17 E. Burlington
Riverside, IL 60546
708-447-3222
ROSELLE
Advantage National Bank
1350 W. Lake St.
Roselle, IL 60172
630-529-0100
SKOKIE
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
7800 Lincoln Ave.
Skokie, IL 60077
847-933-1900
SPRING GROVE
State Bank of The Lakes
1906 Holian Dr.
Spring Grove, IL 60081
815-675-3700
ST. CHARLES
St. Charles Bank & Trust Company
311 N. Second St.
St. Charles, IL 60174
630-377-9500
WAUCONDA
Wauconda Community Bank
495 W. Liberty St.
Wauconda, IL 60084
847-487-2500
Wauconda Community Bank
1180 Dato Ln.
Wauconda, IL 60084
847-487-3770
WESTERN SPRINGS
The Community Bank of Western Springs
1000 Hillgrove Ave.
Western Springs, IL 60558
708-246-7100
WHEATON
Wheaton Bank & Trust Company
211 S. Wheaton Ave.
Wheaton, IL 60187
630-690-1800
WILLOWBROOK
Hinsbrook Bank & Trust
6262 S. Route 83
Willowbrook, IL 60527
630-920-2700
WILMETTE
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
1145 Wilmette Ave.
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-853-1145
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
720 12th St.
Wilmette, IL 60091
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
351 Linden Ave
Wilmette, IL 60091
WINNETKA
North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.
576 Lincoln Ave.
Winnetka, IL 60093
847-441-2265
Wisconsin Banking Locations
DELAFIELD
Town Bank of Delafield
400 Genesee St.
Delafield, WI 53018
262-646-6888
ELM GROVE
Town Bank of Elm Grove
13150 Watertown Plank Rd.
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-789-8696
HARTLAND
Town Bank
850 W. North Shore Dr.
Hartland, WI 53029
262-367-1900
MADISON
Town Bank of Madison
10 W. Mifflin St.
Madison, WI 53703
608-282-4840
WALES
Town Bank of Wales
200 W. Summit Ave.
Wales, WI 53183
262-968-1740
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |
Wayne Hummer Wealth Management
Wayne Hummer Investments, L.L.C.
Wayne Hummer Trust Company
Wayne Hummer Asset Management Co.
Headquarters
222 South Riverside Plaza
28th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
312-431-1700
Branch Offices
4049 West Algonquin Road
Algonquin, IL 60102
815-479-1710
440 Lake Street
Antioch, IL 60002
847-838-7060
311 South Arlington Heights Road
Arlington Heights, IL 60005
847-483-6039
201 South Hough Street
Barrington, IL 60010
847-842-2607
165 West Lake Street
Bloomingdale, IL 60108
847-879-7935
4343 West Peterson Avenue
Chicago, IL 60646
847-251-4385
10258 South Western Avenue
Chicago, IL 60643
773-298-6228
1111 Warren Avenue
Downers Grove, IL 60515
630-325-6571
500 Roosevelt Road
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
630-588-4093
50 Commerce Drive
Grayslake, IL 60030
847-838-7608
675 North OPlaine Road
Gurnee, IL 60031
847-549-1578
25 East First Street
Hinsdale, IL 60521
630-655-8485
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-615-4054
810 South Waukegan Avenue
Lake Forest, IL 60045
847-482-8469
1200 South Milwaukee Avenue
Libertyville, IL 60048
847-573-1633
20012 Wolf Road
Mokena, IL 60448
815-462-5510
245 Waukegan Road
Northfield, IL 60093
847-446-4378
110 W. Palatine Rd.
Palatine, IL 60067
847-842-2637
1000 Hillgrove Avenue
Western Springs, IL 60558
708-784-2549
211 South Wheaton Avenue
Wheaton, IL 60187
630-588-4090
720 12th Street
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-853-2093
200 East Washington Street
Appleton, WI 54911
920-734-1474
850 W. North Shore Drive
Hartland, WI 53029
262-646-3157
FIRST Insurance Funding Corp.
450 Skokie Blvd., Suite 1000
Northbrook, IL 60062
847-374-3000
Broadway Premium Funding Corporation
100 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
212-791-7099
Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee
N48 W16866 Lisbon Road
Menomonee Falls, WI 53051
262-509-6200
WestAmerica Mortgage Company
Colorado Corporate Headquarters
5655 South Yosemite Street, Suite 460
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
303-771-2800
Illinois Corporate Headquarters
1 South 660 Midwest Rd., Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
630-916-9299
Branch Offices
Phoenix, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Walnut Creek, CA
Fort Myers, FL
Chicago, IL
Matteson, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Schaumburg, IL
Tinley Park, IL
Warsaw, IN
Overland Park, KS
Charlotte, NC
Ocean, NJ
Corporate Information
Directors
Allan E. Bulley, Jr.
Peter D. Crist
Bruce K. Crowther
Joseph F. Damico
Bert A. Getz, Jr.
Charles H. James, III
John S. Lillard (Chairman)
Albin F. Moschner
Thomas J. Neis
Hollis W. Rademacher
John J. Schornack
Ingrid S. Stafford
Edward J. Wehmer
Public Listing and Market Symbol
The Companys Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market® under the symbol WTFC.
Website Location
The Company maintains a financial relations internet website at the following location: www.wintrust.com
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 22, 2008
10:00 a.m.
Deerpath Inn
255 East Illinois Road
Lake Forest, Illinois
Form 10-K
The Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission is contained herein this
document. The information is also available on the Internet at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions website. The address for the web site is: http://www.sec.gov.
Transfer Agent
Illinois Stock Transfer Company
209 West Jackson Boulevard
Suite 903
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: 312-427-2953
Facsimile: 312-427-2879
|
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation |