10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-21923
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
36-3873352 |
|
|
|
(State of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
(Address of principal executive offices)
(847) 615-4096
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ |
|
Accelerated Filer o |
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock no par value, 23,973,495 shares, as of May 7, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
1-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
24-51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52-53 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings. |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
|
NA |
|
|
|
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
|
NA |
|
|
|
ITEM 5. Other Information. |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
EX-10.1: |
EX-31.1: |
EX-31.2: |
EX-32.1: |
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
122,207 |
|
|
$ |
219,794 |
|
|
$ |
160,890 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
98,454 |
|
|
|
226,110 |
|
|
|
280,408 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
266,512 |
|
|
|
123,009 |
|
|
|
11,280 |
|
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value |
|
|
1,413,576 |
|
|
|
784,673 |
|
|
|
1,110,854 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
13,815 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
22,786 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
207,107 |
|
|
|
51,029 |
|
|
|
86,634 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
7,621,069 |
|
|
|
6,874,916 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
74,248 |
|
|
|
69,767 |
|
|
|
53,758 |
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
7,767,199 |
|
|
|
7,551,302 |
|
|
|
6,821,158 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
349,245 |
|
|
|
349,875 |
|
|
|
344,863 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
263,145 |
|
|
|
240,664 |
|
|
|
188,607 |
|
Trade date securities receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
788,565 |
|
|
|
395,041 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
276,310 |
|
|
|
276,310 |
|
|
|
276,121 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
13,921 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
16,949 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
$ |
10,658,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,732,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
745,194 |
|
|
$ |
757,844 |
|
|
$ |
670,433 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
7,880,783 |
|
|
|
7,618,906 |
|
|
|
6,813,149 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
8,625,977 |
|
|
|
8,376,750 |
|
|
|
7,483,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
70,300 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
434,482 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
250,488 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
|
|
293,091 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,502 |
|
|
|
249,515 |
|
|
|
249,621 |
|
Trade date securities payable |
|
|
7,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,217 |
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
115,596 |
|
|
|
121,744 |
|
|
|
136,880 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,755,714 |
|
|
|
9,591,754 |
|
|
|
8,979,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
282,662 |
|
|
|
281,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
26,766 |
|
|
|
26,611 |
|
|
|
26,416 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
575,166 |
|
|
|
571,887 |
|
|
|
544,594 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(122,302 |
) |
|
|
(122,290 |
) |
|
|
(122,252 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
315,855 |
|
|
|
318,793 |
|
|
|
314,038 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(14,920 |
) |
|
|
(10,302 |
) |
|
|
(9,503 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
1,066,572 |
|
|
|
753,293 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
$ |
10,658,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,732,466 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
106,887 |
|
|
$ |
118,953 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Securities |
|
|
14,327 |
|
|
|
16,081 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
122,079 |
|
|
|
136,176 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
45,953 |
|
|
|
61,430 |
|
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
Interest on subordinated notes |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
57,297 |
|
|
|
74,434 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
64,782 |
|
|
|
61,742 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
50,309 |
|
|
|
53,187 |
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management |
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
Other |
|
|
13,015 |
|
|
|
8,430 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
36,427 |
|
|
|
24,572 |
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
44,820 |
|
|
|
36,672 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,213 |
|
|
|
9,731 |
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
76,962 |
|
|
|
62,849 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
9,774 |
|
|
|
14,910 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
5,205 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,358 |
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
|
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,855 |
|
|
|
23,518 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
Average common shares and dilutive common shares |
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,281 |
|
|
$ |
539,586 |
|
|
$ |
(122,196 |
) |
|
$ |
309,556 |
|
|
$ |
(13,672 |
) |
|
$ |
739,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities, net
of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
Unrealized losses on derivative
Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,922 |
) |
|
|
(3,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,231 |
) |
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for split-dollar life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
(992 |
) |
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,416 |
|
|
$ |
544,594 |
|
|
$ |
(122,252 |
) |
|
$ |
314,038 |
|
|
$ |
(9,503 |
) |
|
$ |
753,293 |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
281,873 |
|
|
$ |
26,611 |
|
|
$ |
571,887 |
|
|
$ |
(122,290 |
) |
|
$ |
318,793 |
|
|
$ |
(10,302 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066,572 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,358 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities,
net of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,296 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
282,662 |
|
|
$ |
26,766 |
|
|
$ |
575,166 |
|
|
$ |
(122,302 |
) |
|
$ |
315,855 |
|
|
$ |
(14,920 |
) |
|
$ |
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Other Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net |
|
$ |
(11,314 |
) |
|
$ |
11,434 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments arising during the period, net |
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
(6,380 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net |
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
Less: Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(2,951 |
) |
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,618 |
) |
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,109 |
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
555 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
Net (accretion) amortization of premium on securities |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights fair value change and amortization, net |
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Originations and purchases of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,245,129 |
) |
|
|
(462,860 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
1,099,747 |
|
|
|
473,723 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income, net of claims |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in trading securities, net |
|
|
(9,416 |
) |
|
|
386 |
|
Net decrease in brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
Gain on mortgage loans sold |
|
|
(12,209 |
) |
|
|
(3,635 |
) |
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
(2,865 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net |
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
15,846 |
|
|
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
(136,460 |
) |
|
|
48,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
665,932 |
|
|
|
364,956 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
992,398 |
|
|
|
187,292 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(1,504,650 |
) |
|
|
(400,110 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,805 |
|
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
(143,503 |
) |
|
|
(870 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(251,507 |
) |
|
|
(200,808 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(3,766 |
) |
|
|
(9,896 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Investing Activities |
|
|
(245,096 |
) |
|
|
55,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
249,221 |
|
|
|
12,106 |
|
(Decrease) increase in other borrowings, net |
|
|
(86,276 |
) |
|
|
38,657 |
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,301 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stockbased compensation arrangements |
|
68 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock options,
employee stock purchase plan and conversion of common stock warrants |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(7,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,231 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
156,313 |
|
|
|
76,701 |
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(225,243 |
) |
|
|
180,144 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
445,904 |
|
|
|
261,154 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
220,661 |
|
|
$ |
441,298 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Wintrust or the Company) presented herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of management
reflect all necessary adjustments of a normal or recurring nature for a fair presentation of
results as of the dates and for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements.
Wintrust is a financial holding company currently engaged in the business of providing traditional
community banking services to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin.
Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank subsidiaries. Wintrust has 15 wholly-owned bank
subsidiaries (collectively, the Banks), nine of which the Company started as de novo
institutions, including Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company (Lake Forest Bank), Hinsdale Bank &
Trust Company (Hinsdale Bank), North Shore Community Bank & Trust Company (North Shore Bank),
Libertyville Bank & Trust Company (Libertyville Bank), Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A.
(Barrington Bank), Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (Crystal Lake Bank), Northbrook Bank
& Trust Company (Northbrook Bank), Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (Beverly Bank) and Old
Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A. (Old Plank Trail Bank). The Company acquired Advantage National
Bank (Advantage Bank) in October 2003, Village Bank & Trust (Village Bank) in December 2003,
Northview Bank & Trust (Northview Bank) in September 2004, Town Bank in October 2004, State Bank
of The Lakes in January 2005, First Northwest Bank in March 2005 and Hinsbrook Bank and Trust
(Hinsbrook Bank) in May 2006. In December 2004, Northview Banks Wheaton branch became its main
office, it was renamed Wheaton Bank & Trust (Wheaton Bank) and its two Northfield locations
became branches of Northbrook Bank and its Mundelein location became a branch of Libertyville Bank.
In May 2005, First Northwest Bank was merged into Village Bank. In November 2006, Hinsbrook Banks
Geneva branch was renamed St. Charles Bank & Trust (St. Charles Bank), its Willowbrook, Downers
Grove and Darien locations became branches of Hinsdale Bank and its Glen Ellyn location became a
branch of Wheaton Bank.
The Company provides, on a national basis, loans to businesses to finance insurance premiums on
their commercial insurance policies (premium finance receivables) through First Insurance Funding
Corporation (FIFC). In November 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium Funding Corporation
(Broadway). Broadway also provides loans to businesses to finance insurance premiums, mainly
through insurance agents and brokers in the northeastern portion of the United States and
California. On October 1, 2008, Broadway merged with its parent, FIFC, but continues to utilize the
Broadway brand in serving its segment of the marketplace.
In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy premiums for high net-worth individuals. These
loans are originated through independent insurance agents with assistance from financial advisors
and legal counsel. The life insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these
loans can be secured with a letter of credit or certificate of deposit. FIFC is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Lake Forest Bank.
Wintrust, through Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (Tricom), provides high-yielding short-term accounts
receivable financing (Tricom finance receivables) and value-added out-sourced administrative
services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to the
temporary staffing industry, with clients located throughout the United States. Tricom is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hinsdale Bank.
The Company provides a full range of wealth management services through its trust, asset management
and broker-dealer subsidiaries. Trust and investment services are provided at the Banks through the
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Hummer Trust Company, N.A. (WHTC), a de novo company
started in 1998. Wayne Hummer Investments, LLC (WHI) is a broker-dealer providing a full range of
private client and securities brokerage services to clients located primarily in the Midwest. WHI
has office locations staffed by one or more registered financial advisors in a majority of the
Companys Banks. WHI also provides a full range of investment services to individuals through a
network of relationships with community-based financial institutions primarily in Illinois. WHI is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of North Shore Bank. Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company (WHAMC)
provides money management services and advisory services to individuals, institutions and municipal
and tax-exempt organizations, in addition to portfolio management and financial supervision for a
wide range of pension and profit-sharing plans. WHI
5
and WHAMC were acquired in 2002, and in February 2003, the Company acquired Lake Forest Capital
Management (LFCM), a registered investment advisor, which was merged into WHAMC. WHTC, WHI and
WHAMC are referred to collectively as the Wayne Hummer Companies.
In May 2004, the Company acquired Wintrust Mortgage Corporation (WMC) (formerly known as
WestAmerica Mortgage Company) and its affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc. (Guardian).
WMC engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the
secondary market. WMC maintains principal origination offices in ten states, including Illinois,
and originates loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. WMC is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrington Bank. Guardian provided document preparation and other loan
closing services to WMC and a network of mortgage brokers. Guardian was merged into Barrington Bank
in November 2008. In December 2008, WMC acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of
the mortgage banking business of Professional Mortgage Partners (PMP).
Wintrust Information Technology Services Company (WITS) provides information technology support,
item capture, imaging and statement preparation services to the Wintrust subsidiaries and is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Wintrust.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and do not include information or
footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
included in the Companys Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Operating results reported for the three-month period are not necessarily indicative of the results
which may be expected for the entire year. Reclassifications of certain prior period amounts have
been made to conform to the current period presentation.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Management believes that the
estimates made are reasonable, however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other
conditions develop differently from managements expectations. Certain policies and accounting
principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments
and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than
originally reported. Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly
dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those
estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management
currently views the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations required for impairment
testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative instruments and income taxes as
the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be
the most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Descriptions of our significant
accounting policies are included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the
Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
(2) Recent Accounting Developments
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No.
141R-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That
Arise from Contingencies (FSP 141R-1). FSP 141R-1 amends and clarifies SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R), to address application issues raised by preparers, auditors, and members
of the legal profession on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. FSP 141R-1 is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP 141R-1 did not have a material
impact on the Companys financial statements.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends
FASB Statement No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly
traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective
for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The
Company did not early adopt this FSP. The adoption will expand the Companys disclosures regarding
the use of fair value in interim periods. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
the new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
amends the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) guidance in GAAP for debt securities and the
presentation and disclosure requirements of OTTI on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI
of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 requires separate display of losses related to
credit deterioration and losses related to other market factors. When an entity does not intend to
sell the security and it is more likely than not that an entity will not have to sell the security
before recovery of its cost basis, it must recognize the credit component of OTTI in earnings and
the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for
interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company
did not early adopt this FSP. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new
pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating
fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), when the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP FAS 157-4 also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS
157-4 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted. The Company did not early adopt this FSP. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS 161). Effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 by requiring enhanced
disclosures for how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations; and
how derivative instruments and related items affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 only relates to disclosures and did not have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS
160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material impact
on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R
requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date; the immediate
expense recognition of transaction costs; and accounting for restructuring plans separately from
the business combination. SFAS 141R eliminates separate recognition of the acquired allowance for
loan losses on the acquirers balance sheet as credit related factors will be incorporated directly
into the fair value of the loans recorded at the acquisition date. SFAS 141R is effective for
business combinations occurring after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141R did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements.
7
(3) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers cash and cash
equivalents to include cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, non-interest bearing
amounts due from correspondent banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
(4) Available-for-sale Securities
The following table is a summary of the available-for-sale securities portfolio as of the dates
shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
122,160 |
|
|
$ |
120,287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
605,911 |
|
|
|
604,336 |
|
|
|
297,191 |
|
|
|
298,729 |
|
|
|
195,457 |
|
|
|
196,094 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
66,223 |
|
|
|
67,093 |
|
|
|
59,471 |
|
|
|
59,295 |
|
|
|
58,458 |
|
|
|
58,753 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
82,301 |
|
|
|
72,145 |
|
|
|
36,157 |
|
|
|
28,041 |
|
|
|
43,997 |
|
|
|
40,339 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
426,646 |
|
|
|
437,261 |
|
|
|
272,492 |
|
|
|
285,307 |
|
|
|
698,594 |
|
|
|
701,482 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock
and other equity securities |
|
|
115,663 |
|
|
|
112,454 |
|
|
|
115,414 |
|
|
|
113,301 |
|
|
|
114,507 |
|
|
|
114,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
1,418,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,413,576 |
|
|
$ |
780,725 |
|
|
$ |
784,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,111,013 |
|
|
$ |
1,110,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of available-for-sale securities includes investments totaling approximately $18.3
million with unrealized losses of $5.4 million, which have been in an unrealized loss position for
greater than 12 months. Available-for-sale securities are reviewed for possible OTTI on a
quarterly basis. During this review, the Company considers the severity and duration of the
unrealized losses as well as its intent and ability to hold the securities until recovery, taking
into account balance sheet management strategies and its market view and outlook. The Company also
assesses the nature of the unrealized losses taking into consideration market factors, such as the
widening of general credit spreads, the industry in which the issuer operates and market supply and
demand, as well as the creditworthiness of the issuer. As a result of OTTI reviews during the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $2.1 million and $1.9 million,
respectively, of OTTI losses on certain corporate notes and other debt securities. The Company
concluded that none of the other unrealized losses on the available-for-sale securities portfolio
represents an OTTI as of March 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company has the intent and ability to hold
these investments until such time as the values recover or until maturity.
8
(5) Loans
The following table is a summary of the loan portfolio as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,933,355 |
|
|
$ |
4,778,664 |
|
|
$ |
4,534,383 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
920,412 |
|
|
|
896,438 |
|
|
|
695,446 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
280,808 |
|
|
|
262,908 |
|
|
|
233,556 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,418,156 |
|
|
|
1,346,586 |
|
|
|
1,017,011 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
154,257 |
|
|
|
175,955 |
|
|
|
230,771 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
134,459 |
|
|
|
160,518 |
|
|
|
163,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
7,841,447 |
|
|
$ |
7,621,069 |
|
|
$ |
6,874,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans include auto, boat, snowmobile and other indirect consumer loans. Premium
finance receivables are recorded net of unearned income. The unearned income portions of premium
finance receivables were $28.8 million at March 31, 2009, $27.1 million at December 31, 2008 and
$21.8 million at March 31, 2008. Total loans include net deferred loan fees and costs and fair
value purchase accounting adjustments totaling $9.6 million at March 31, 2009, $9.4 million at
December 31, 2008 and $7.4 million at March 31, 2008.
(6) Deposits
The following table is a summary of deposits as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
745,194 |
|
|
$ |
757,844 |
|
|
$ |
670,433 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,064,663 |
|
|
|
1,040,105 |
|
|
|
1,013,603 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
833,291 |
|
|
|
716,178 |
|
|
|
647,798 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,313,157 |
|
|
|
1,124,068 |
|
|
|
797,215 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
406,376 |
|
|
|
337,808 |
|
|
|
325,096 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,263,296 |
|
|
|
4,400,747 |
|
|
|
4,029,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
8,625,977 |
|
|
$ |
8,376,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,483,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management deposits represent deposit balances at the Companys subsidiary banks from
brokerage customers of Wayne Hummer Investments, trust and asset management customers of Wayne
Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from unaffiliated companies which have been placed
into deposit accounts of the Banks.
9
(7) Notes Payable, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, Other Borrowings and Subordinated Notes
The following table is a summary of notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other
borrowings and subordinated notes as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
70,300 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
434,482 |
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
248,660 |
|
|
|
334,925 |
|
|
|
290,585 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
250,488 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
|
|
293,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances,
other borrowings and subordinated notes |
|
$ |
757,469 |
|
|
$ |
843,745 |
|
|
$ |
872,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.0 million balance at March 31, 2009 represents the outstanding balance
on a $101.0 million loan agreement (Agreement) with an unaffiliated bank. The Agreement consists
of a $100.0 million revolving note, with a maturity date of August 31, 2009, and a $1.0 million
note that matures on June 1, 2015. At March 31, 2009, there was no outstanding balance on the
$100.0 million revolving note. Interest is calculated, at the Companys option, at a floating rate
equal to either: (1) LIBOR plus 200 basis points or (2) the greater of the lenders prime rate or
the Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. The Agreement is secured by the stock of some of the
Banks and contains several restrictive covenants, including the maintenance of various capital
adequacy levels, asset quality and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and
other indebtedness. On May 11, 2009 the Company and lender entered into an amendment to the
Agreement which waived the prior violation of a debt covenant and amended the covenant to require
that the Company have a return on assets in excess of zero percent based on quarterly regulatory
filings through June 30, 2009 and in excess of 0.35 percent thereafter. The Agreement may be
utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund continued growth at the Companys Banks and to
serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common stock repurchases or other general
corporate purposes.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of fixed rate obligations of the Banks and are
collateralized by qualifying residential real estate and home equity loans and certain securities.
FHLB advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted for unamortized fair value adjustments
recorded in connection with advances acquired through acquisitions.
At March 31, 2009, securities sold under repurchase agreements represent $64.9 million of customer
balances in sweep accounts in connection with master repurchase agreements at the Banks and $183.8
million of short-term borrowings from brokers.
The subordinated notes represent three notes, issued in October 2002, April 2003 and October 2005
(funded in May 2006). The balances of the notes as of March 31, 2009 were $20.0 million, $25.0
million and $25.0 million, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments
of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year, with final maturities in the tenth year. The Company
may redeem the subordinated notes at any time prior to maturity. Interest on each note is
calculated at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 130 basis points.
10
(8) Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of March 31, 2009, the Company owned 100% of the common securities of nine trusts, Wintrust
Capital Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust
VII, Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust Capital Trust IX, Northview Capital Trust I, Town
Bankshares Capital Trust I, and First Northwest Capital Trust I (the Trusts) set up to provide
long-term financing. The Northview, Town and First Northwest capital trusts were acquired as part
of the acquisitions of Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., and First Northwest
Bancorp, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were formed for purposes of issuing trust preferred
securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the issuance of the trust
preferred securities and common securities solely in junior subordinated debentures issued by the
Company (or assumed by the Company in connection with an acquisition), with the same maturities and
interest rates as the trust preferred securities. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole
assets of the Trusts. In each Trust, the common securities represent approximately 3% of the
junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities represent approximately 97% of
the junior subordinated debentures.
The Trusts are reported in the Companys consolidated financial statements as unconsolidated
subsidiaries. Accordingly, in the Consolidated Statements of Condition, the junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Company to the Trusts are reported as liabilities and the common
securities of the Trusts, all of which are owned by the Company, are included in available-for-sale
securities.
The following table provides a summary of the Companys junior subordinated debentures as of March
31, 2009. The junior subordinated debentures represent the par value of the obligations owed to the
Trusts and basis adjustments for unamortized fair value adjustments recognized at the respective
acquisition dates for the Northview, Town and First Northwest obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust |
|
|
Junior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Issue |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Redemption |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
|
Debentures |
|
|
Structure |
|
|
at 3/31/09 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust III |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
L+3.25 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
04/2003 |
|
|
|
04/2033 |
|
|
|
04/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
L+2.80 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
|
12/2003 |
|
|
|
12/2033 |
|
|
|
12/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust V |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+2.60 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
06/2009 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VII |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
L+1.95 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
12/2004 |
|
|
|
03/2035 |
|
|
|
03/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+1.45 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
08/2005 |
|
|
|
09/2035 |
|
|
|
09/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust IX |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
09/2006 |
|
|
|
09/2036 |
|
|
|
09/2011 |
|
Northview Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
First Northwest Capital Trust I |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
05/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The junior subordinated debentures totaled $249.5 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
and $249.6 million at March 31, 2008.
The interest rates on the variable rate junior subordinated debentures are based on the three-month
LIBOR rate and reset on a quarterly basis. The interest rate on the Wintrust Capital Trust IX
junior subordinated debentures, currently fixed at 6.84%, changes to a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 1.63% effective September 15, 2011. At March 31, 2009, the weighted average
contractual interest rate on the junior subordinated debentures was 4.24%. The Company entered into
$175 million of interest rate swaps to hedge the variable cash flows on certain junior subordinated
debentures. The hedge-adjusted rate on the junior subordinated debentures on March 31, 2009, was
7.16%. Distributions on all issues are payable on a quarterly basis.
11
The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions and payments upon liquidation or redemption
of the trust preferred securities, in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The
Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the obligations of the Company under the
guarantees, the junior subordinated debentures, and other related agreements provide, in the
aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the
obligations of the Trusts under the trust preferred securities. Subject to certain limitations, the
Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on the junior subordinated debentures at any
time, or from time to time, for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior
subordinated debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated debentures
are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time after the earliest redemption
dates shown in the table, and earlier at the discretion of the Company if certain conditions are
met, and, in any event, only after the Company has obtained Federal Reserve approval, if then
required under applicable guidelines or regulations.
The junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of
the Company for regulatory purposes. The amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other
capital elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to
restrictions.
12
(9) Segment Information
The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the
internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial
performance of the Company. The Company evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit or
loss and other appropriate profitability measures common to each segment. Certain indirect
expenses have been allocated based on actual volume measurements and other criteria, as
appropriate. Inter-segment revenue and transfers are generally accounted for at current market
prices. The parent and inter-segment eliminations reflect parent company information and
inter-segment eliminations. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company combined the premium finance
and Tricom segments into the specialty finance segment. Prior period information has been restated
to reflect this change.
The net interest income and segment profit of the banking segment includes income and related
interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty finance segment. For
purposes of internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its
specialty finance segment as if all loans originated and sold to the banking segment were retained
within that segments operations, thereby causing inter-segment eliminations. Similarly, for
purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates the
net interest income earned by the banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth
management segment to the wealth management segment. (See Wealth management deposits discussion
in Deposits section of this report for more information on these deposits.) The following table
presents a summary of certain operating information for each reportable segment for the three
months ended for the period shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
$ Change in |
|
|
% Change in |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Contribution |
|
|
Contribution |
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
$ |
61,809 |
|
|
$ |
60,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
17,543 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(22,534 |
) |
|
|
(21,291 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income |
|
$ |
64,782 |
|
|
$ |
61,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
$ |
23,476 |
|
|
$ |
17,280 |
|
|
$ |
6,196 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Wealth management |
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
9,685 |
|
|
|
(1,681 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
(4,248 |
) |
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
24,572 |
|
|
$ |
11,855 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
$ |
5,840 |
|
|
$ |
14,557 |
|
|
$ |
(8,717 |
) |
|
|
(60) |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
8,532 |
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Wealth management |
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(10,835 |
) |
|
|
(16,153 |
) |
|
|
(5,318 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit (loss) |
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
|
$ |
(3,347 |
) |
|
|
(34) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
$ |
10,703,998 |
|
|
$ |
9,563,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,140,116 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
1,493,495 |
|
|
|
1,097,674 |
|
|
|
395,821 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
52,867 |
|
|
|
61,293 |
|
|
|
8,426 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(1,431,419 |
) |
|
|
(990,383 |
) |
|
|
(441,036 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
$ |
9,732,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,086,475 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
(10) Derivative Financial Instruments
Management uses derivative financial instruments to protect against the risk of interest rate
movements on the value of certain assets and liabilities and on future cash flows. The instruments
that have been used by the Company include interest rate swaps and interest rate caps with indices
that relate to the pricing of specific liabilities and covered call options that relate to specific
investment securities. In addition, interest rate lock commitments provided to customers for the
origination of mortgage loans that will be sold into the secondary market as well as forward
agreements the Company enters into to sell such loans to protect itself against adverse changes in
interest rates are deemed to be derivative instruments.
Derivative instruments have inherent risks, primarily market risk and credit risk. Market risk is
associated with changes in interest rates and credit risk relates to the risk that the counterparty
will fail to perform according to the terms of the agreement. The amounts potentially subject to
market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the contracts and the market
value of the derivative instrument which is determined based on the interaction of the notional
amount of the contract with the underlying, and not the notional principal amounts used to express
the volume of the transactions. Management monitors the market risk and credit risk associated
with derivative financial instruments as part of its overall Asset/Liability management process.
In accordance with SFAS 133, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the
consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the
instrument. Derivative financial instruments are included in other assets or other liabilities, as
appropriate, on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders equity as a
component of other comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument
qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow
hedge. Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are
recorded in income in the same period and in the same income statement line as changes in the fair
values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivative
financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective hedges,
are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair
values of derivative financial instruments not qualifying as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133 are
reported in non-interest income. Derivative contracts are valued by a third party and are
periodically validated by comparison with valuations provided by the respective counterparties.
Interest Rate Swaps Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
The tables below identify the Companys interest rate swaps at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, which were entered into to hedge certain LIBOR-based junior subordinated debentures and
designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to SFAS 133 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Receive Rate |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
Type of Hedging |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(LIBOR) |
|
|
(Fixed) |
|
|
Relationship |
|
|
Pay Fixed, Receive Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2011 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,758 |
) |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(3,489 |
) |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
October 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(6,286 |
) |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(5,058 |
) |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
(17,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Receive Rate |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
Type of Hedging |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(LIBOR) |
|
|
(Fixed) |
|
|
Relationship |
|
|
Pay Fixed, Receive Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2011 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(3,789 |
) |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
October 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(6,916 |
) |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(5,603 |
) |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
(19,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values, or unrealized losses, of $17.7 million at March 31, 2009 and $19.3 million at
December 31, 2008 are included in other liabilities. The Company
estimates that $6.9 million of the unrealized loss at March 31, 2009,
will be reclassified to interest expense over the next 12 months. The Company uses the hypothetical derivative
method to assess and measure effectiveness. These hedges were considered highly effective during
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and none of the change in fair value of these derivatives was
attributed to hedge ineffectiveness. The changes in fair value, net of tax, are separately
disclosed in the statement of changes in shareholders equity as a component of comprehensive
income. Net cash flows from these interest rate swaps are included in interest expense on junior
subordinated debentures.
In September 2008, the Company terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $25.0
million (maturing in October 2011) that was designated in a cash flow hedge and entered into a new
interest rate swap with another counterparty to effectively replace the terminated swap. The
interest rate swap was terminated by the Company in accordance with the default provisions in the
swap agreement. The unrealized loss on the interest rate swap at the date of termination is being
amortized out of other comprehensive income to interest expense over the remaining term of the
terminated swap. At March 31, 2009, other comprehensive income included $691,000 of unrealized
loss, net of tax, related to the terminated swap. During the first
quarter of 2009, $112,000 was reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income to interest expense, and at March 31, 2009,
accumulated other comprehensive income included $1.1 million of
unrealized loss ($691,000 net of tax) related to the terminated swap.
A
rollfoward of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income
related to interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Unrealized
gain (loss) at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(20,547) |
|
|
$ |
(9,067) |
|
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
to interest expense on junior subordinated debentures |
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
(6,642 |
) |
Unrealized
gain (loss) at end of period |
|
$ |
(18,796) |
|
|
$ |
(15,447) |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Under SFAS 133
The Companys banking subsidiaries offer certain derivative products directly to qualified
commercial borrowers. These transactions allow the Companys commercial borrowers to effectively
convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. The Company economically hedges customer derivative
transactions by entering into offsetting derivatives executed with third parties upon the
origination of a derivative contract with a customer. Derivative transactions executed as part of
this program are not designated in SFAS 133 hedge relationships and are, therefore,
marked-to-market through earnings each period. In most cases the derivatives have mirror-image
terms, which result in the positions changes in fair value offsetting completely through earnings
each period. However, to the extent that the derivatives are not a mirror-image, changes in fair
value will not completely offset, resulting in some earnings impact
each period. Changes in the fair value of these interest rate swaps
are included in other non-interest income. The following
table summarizes these interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value |
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value Gain |
|
|
Amount |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount |
|
(Loss) |
|
Interest rate swaps on variable
rate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with commercial borrowers
|
|
$ |
123,851 |
|
|
$ |
(9,752 |
) |
|
$ |
101,136 |
|
|
$ |
(9,295 |
) |
mirror-image interest rate swaps with third party financial institutions
|
|
$ |
123,851 |
|
|
$ |
9,959 |
|
|
$ |
101,136 |
|
|
$ |
9,115 |
|
|
At March 31, 2009, other assets included $10.0 of derivative assets and other liabilities included
$9.8 million of derivative liabilities related to these swap transactions. At December 31, 2008,
other assets included $9.1 million of derivative assets and other liabilities included $9.3 million
of derivative liabilities related to these interest rate swap transactions. At March 31, 2009,
these interest rate swaps had maturity dates ranging from August 2010 to March 2019.
2
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
The Companys mortgage banking derivatives have not been designated in SFAS 133 hedge
relationships. These derivatives include commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate
locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of
residential mortgage loans. It is the Companys practice to enter into forward commitments for the
future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into
in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates on its commitments to fund
the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale. The following table
summarizes these mortgage banking derivatives as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Interest rate lock
commitments |
|
$ |
600,280 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
176,115 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(387 |
) |
Forward commitments
to sell mortgage loans |
|
$ |
814,408 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
(2,219 |
) |
|
$ |
237,320 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
$ |
(577 |
) |
|
At March 31, 2009, other assets included $1.7 million of mortgage banking derivatives and other
liabilities included $2.5 million of mortgage banking derivatives. At December 31, 2008, other
assets included $457,000 of mortgage banking derivatives and other liabilities included $577,000 of
mortgage banking derivatives. The fair values of these derivatives were estimated based on changes
in mortgage rates from the dates of the commitments. Changes in the fair value of these mortgage
banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Amounts included in the consolidated statement of income related to derivative instruments not
designated in hedge relationships were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income statement |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Derivatives not designated
in hedge relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other income
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Mortgage banking
derivatives
|
|
Mortgage banking
|
|
$ |
(708 |
) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
Other Derivatives
Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain
securities held within the Banks investment portfolios (covered call options). These option
transactions are designed primarily to increase the total return associated with the investment
securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133, and,
accordingly, changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized as other non-interest income.
The Company recognized premium income from these call option transactions of $2.0 million and $6.8
in the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. There were no covered call options
outstanding as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 or March 31, 2008.
3
(11) Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of SFAS 157, the Company began to group financial assets
and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the
assets and liabilities are traded and the observability of the assumptions used to determine fair
value. These levels are:
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability or inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys own assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets
and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments
for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or
estimation. |
A financial instruments categorization within the above valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets or liabilities. Following is a description
of the valuation methodologies used for the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
Available-for-sale and Trading account securities - Fair values for available-for-sale and trading
account securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of
alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators from market makers.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans originated by WMC on or after January 1, 2008 are
carried at fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is determined by reference
to investor price sheets for loan products with similar characteristics.
Mortgage servicing rights Fair value for mortgage servicing rights is determined utilizing a
third party valuation model which stratifies the servicing rights into pools based on product type
and interest rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is calculated based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated
with that pool, given current market conditions. Estimates of fair value include assumptions about
prepayment speeds, interest rates and other factors which are subject to change over time.
Derivative instruments The Companys derivative instruments include interest rate swaps,
commitments to fund mortgages for sale into the secondary market (interest rate locks) and forward
commitments to end investors for the sale of mortgage loans. Interest rate swaps are valued by a
third party, using models that primarily use market observable inputs, such as yield curves, and
are validated by comparison with valuations provided by the respective counterparties. The fair
value for mortgage derivatives is based on changes in mortgage rates from the date of the
commitments.
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets The underlying assets relating to the nonqualified
deferred compensation plan are included in a trust and primarily consist of non-exchange traded
institutional funds.
Retained interests from the sale of premium finance receivables The fair value of retained
interests, which include servicing rights and interest only strips, from the sale of premium
finance receivables are based on certain observable inputs such as interest rates and credits
spreads, as well as unobservable inputs such as prepayments, late payments and estimated net
charge-offs.
17
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities (1) |
|
$ |
1,334,487 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,111,561 |
|
|
$ |
222,926 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
13,815 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
12,218 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
207,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
interests from the sale of premium finance receivables |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,573,670 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
1,333,858 |
|
|
$ |
239,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities (1) |
|
$ |
1,033,031 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
837,682 |
|
|
$ |
195,349 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
86,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
4,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,371 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interests from the sale of premium
finance receivables |
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,137,421 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
931,857 |
|
|
$ |
205,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
19,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes Federal Reserve and FHLB stock and the common securities issued by trusts formed by
the Company in conjunction with Trust Preferred Securities offerings. |
The aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 for
mortgage loans held-for-sale measured at fair value under SFAS 159 was $202.1 million and $85.3
million, respectively, while the aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale was $207.1
million and $86.6 million, respectively, as shown in the above tables. There were no nonaccrual
loans or loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing in the mortgage loans held-for-sale
portfolio measured at fair value as of March 31, 2009 and 2008.
18
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available- |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for-sale |
|
|
Account |
|
|
servicing |
|
|
Retained |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
40,992 |
|
|
$ |
3,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
183,515 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
222,926 |
|
|
$ |
12,218 |
|
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
95,514 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,730 |
|
|
$ |
4,480 |
|
Total net gains included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
2,955 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
103,407 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(3,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
195,349 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
|
$ |
5,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for trading account securities is recognized as a component of trading income in
non-interest income, changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a
component of mortgage banking revenue in non-interest income while gains for retained
interests are recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium finance receivables in
non-interest income. |
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually
result from application of lower of cost or market accounting or impairment charges of individual
assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held in the
balance sheet at the end of the period, the following table provides the carrying value of the
related individual assets or portfolios at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Losses Recognized |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
151,290 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
151,290 |
|
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
41,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
192,807 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
192,807 |
|
|
$ |
4,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans - A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events,
it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due pursuant to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by estimating the fair value of
the loan based on the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, or the
fair value of the underlying collateral. As stated in SFAS 157, impaired loans are considered a
fair value measurement where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral.
Appraised values, which may require adjustments to market-based valuation inputs, are generally
used on real estate collateral-dependant impaired loans.
Other real estate owned - Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial
or full satisfaction of loans and is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is recorded
at its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, with any excess
of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying
amount and are recorded in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if any, are also
charged to
19
other non-interest expense. Fair value is generally based on
third party appraisals and internal estimates and is therefore considered a Level 3 valuation.
(12) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of the Companys goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December, |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
2009 |
|
Banking |
|
$ |
245,886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
245,886 |
|
Premium finance |
|
|
16,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,095 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
276,310 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
276,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No adjustments were made to goodwill in the first three months of 2009. However, pursuant to the
WMC transaction, Wintrust could still pay additional contingent consideration to former owners of
Guardian as a result of attaining certain performance measures
through June 2009. Additionally, pursuant to the PMP
transaction, Wintrust could pay contingent consideration to the
former owner of PMP as a result of attaining certain performance
measures through December 2011. Any payments
would be reflected in the Banking segments
goodwill.
A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2008 and the expected amortization as of March 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Wealth management segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer list intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
3,252 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,127 |
) |
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
(2,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(14,122 |
) |
|
|
(13,483 |
) |
|
|
(11,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
14,435 |
|
|
|
16,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
13,921 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
16,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual in 3 months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
687 |
|
Estimated remaining in 2009 |
|
|
2,030 |
|
Estimated 2010 |
|
|
2,381 |
|
Estimated 2011 |
|
|
2,253 |
|
Estimated 2012 |
|
|
2,251 |
|
Estimated 2013 |
|
|
2,235 |
|
The customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the acquisitions of LFCM in 2003 and
WHAMC in 2002 are being amortized over seven-year periods on an accelerated basis. The core
deposit intangibles recognized in connection with the Companys seven bank acquisitions since 2003
are being amortized over ten-year periods on an accelerated basis. Amortization expense associated
with finite-lived intangibles totaled approximately $687,000 and $788,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
20
(13) Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan), which was approved by the Companys shareholders
in January 2007, permits the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, rights
and restricted stock, as well as the conversion of outstanding options of acquired companies to
Wintrust options. The 2007 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock.
All grants made in 2007 and 2008 were made pursuant to the 2007 Plan. As of March 31, 2009, 133,031
shares were available for future grant. The 2007 Plan replaced the Wintrust Financial Corporation
1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan) which had substantially similar terms. The 2007 Plan
and the 1997 Plan are collectively referred to as the Plans. The Plans cover substantially all
employees of Wintrust.
The Company typically awards stock-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted
share awards. Stock options typically provide the holder the option to purchase shares of
Wintrusts common stock at the fair market value of the stock on the date the options are granted.
Options generally vest ratably over a five-year period and expire at such time as the Compensation
Committee determines at the time of grant. The 2007 Plan provides for a maximum term of seven years
from the date of grant while the 1997 Plan provided for a maximum term of ten years. Restricted
shares entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of the Companys common stock.
Restricted shares generally vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant. Holders
of the restricted shares are not entitled to vote or receive cash dividends (or cash payments equal
to the cash dividends) on the underlying common shares until the awards are vested. Except in
limited circumstances, these awards are canceled upon termination of employment without any payment
of consideration by the Company.
Compensation cost charged to income for stock options was $891,000 in the first quarter of 2009 and
$1.1 million in the first quarter of 2008. Compensation cost charged to income for restricted
shares was $882,000 in the first quarter of 2009 and $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2008.
Stock based compensation is recognized based upon the number of awards that are ultimately expected
to vest. As a result, recognized compensation expense for stock options and restricted share awards
was reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Forfeitures rates are estimated for each
type of award based on historical forfeiture experience. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed
in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.
Stock-based compensation cost is measured as the fair value of an award on the date of grant and is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted shares is
determined based on the average of the high and low trading prices on the grant date. The Company
estimates the fair value of stock options at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model that utilizes the assumptions outlined in the following table. Option-pricing models require
the input of highly subjective assumptions and are sensitive to changes in the options expected
life and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially affect the fair value
estimate. Expected life is based on historical exercise and termination behavior as well as the
term of the option, and expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the
Companys common stock, which correlates with the expected term of the options. The risk-free
interest rate is based on comparable U.S. Treasury rates. Management reviews and adjusts the
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of an option on a periodic basis to better reflect
expected trends. The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of options granted
in the three months ending March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
21
A summary of stock option activity under the Plans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Common |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Value(2) |
Stock Options |
|
Shares | |
Strike Price |
|
Term(1) |
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,388,174 |
|
|
$ |
35.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(46,591 |
) |
|
|
11.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
|
|
12.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,352,836 |
|
|
$ |
35.97 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,942,205 |
|
|
$ |
34.03 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,505,181 |
|
|
$ |
34.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
53,450 |
|
|
|
31.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(61,908 |
) |
|
|
15.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(8,820 |
) |
|
|
49.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,487,903 |
|
|
$ |
35.13 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
$18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,816,032 |
|
|
$ |
30.61 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
$18,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the weighted average contractual life remaining in years. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (i.e., the
difference between the Companys average of the high and low stock price on the last trading
day of the quarter and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that
would have been received by the option holders if they had exercised their options on the last
day of the quarter. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Companys
stock. |
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $4.44 and $10.95, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, was $176,000 and $1.1
million, respectively.
A summary of restricted share award activity under the Plans for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and March 31, 2008, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
Restricted Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
262,997 |
|
|
$ |
44.09 |
|
|
|
308,627 |
|
|
$ |
48.16 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,054 |
|
|
|
31.07 |
|
Vested (shares issued) |
|
|
(59,635 |
) |
|
|
41.39 |
|
|
|
(43,628 |
) |
|
|
48.94 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
37.15 |
|
|
|
(2,474 |
) |
|
|
34.85 |
|
|
Outstanding at March 31 |
|
|
203,064 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
|
298,579 |
|
|
$ |
46.07 |
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, there was $9.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share based arrangements under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of approximately two years.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises and vesting of restricted shares.
22
(14) Shareholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasurys (the U.S. Treasury) Capital Purchase Program,
on December 19, 2008, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury, in exchange for aggregate
consideration of $250 million, (i) 250,000 shares of the Companys fixed rate cumulative perpetual
preferred Stock, Series B, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series B Preferred
Stock), and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,643,295 shares of Wintrust common stock at a per share
exercise price of $22.82 and with a term of 10 years. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a
cumulative dividend at a coupon rate of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. This
investment can, with the approval of the Federal Reserve, be redeemed.
For as long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the ability of the Company
to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for
consideration, shares of its common stock or other securities, including trust preferred
securities, will be subject to restrictions. The U.S. Treasurys consent is required for any
increase in common dividends per share from the amount of the Companys semiannual cash dividend of
$0.18 per share, until the third anniversary of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury
unless prior to such third anniversary the Series B Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the
U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to third parties.
In August 2008, the Company issued for $50 million, 50,000 shares of non-cumulative perpetual
convertible preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series A
Preferred Stock) in a private transaction. If declared, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock
are payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.00% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock is
convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 38.88 shares of
common stock per share of Series A Preferred Stock. On and after August 26, 2010, the preferred
stock will be subject to mandatory conversion into common stock under certain circumstances.
The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
23,855 |
|
|
|
23,518 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and
effect of dilutive potential common
shares |
|
|
(C |
) |
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(A/B |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
(A/C |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive common shares can result from stock options, restricted stock unit awards,
stock warrants, the Companys convertible preferred stock and shares to be issued under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan, being treated as if
they had been either exercised or issued, computed by application of the treasury stock method.
While potentially dilutive common shares are typically included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share, potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from this computation in
periods in which the effect would reduce the loss per share or increase the income per share. For
diluted earnings per share, net income applicable to common shares can be affected by the
conversion of the Companys convertible preferred stock. Where the effect of this conversion would
reduce the loss per share or increase the income per share, net income applicable to common shares
is adjusted by the associated preferred dividends.
23
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition as of March 31, 2009, compared with
December 31, 2008, and March 31, 2008, and the results of operations for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 should be read in conjunction with the Companys unaudited
consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and, as such, future results could
differ significantly from managements current expectations. See the last section of this
discussion for further information on forward-looking statements.
Overview and Strategy
Wintrust is a financial holding company providing traditional community banking services as well as
a full array of wealth management services to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area and
southern Wisconsin. Additionally, the Company operates other financing businesses on a national
basis through several non-bank subsidiaries.
Community Banking
As of March 31, 2009, the Companys community banking franchise consisted of 15 community banks
(the Banks) with 79 locations. The Company developed its banking franchise through the de novo
organization of nine banks (55 locations) and the purchase of seven banks, one of which was merged
into another of our banks, with 24 locations. Wintrusts first bank was organized in December
1991, as a highly personal service-oriented community bank. Each of the banks organized or
acquired since then share that same commitment to community banking. The historical financial
performance of the Company has been affected by costs associated with growing market share in
deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring banks, opening new branch facilities and building an
experienced management team. The Companys financial performance generally reflects the improved
profitability of its banking subsidiaries as they mature, offset by the costs of establishing and
acquiring banks and opening new branch facilities. From the Companys experience, it generally
takes over 13 months for new banks to achieve operational profitability depending on the number and
timing of branch facilities added.
The following table presents the Banks in chronological order based on the date in which they
joined Wintrust. Each of the Banks has established additional full-service banking facilities
subsequent to their initial openings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
De novo/ Acquired |
|
Date |
Lake Forest Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
December, 1991 |
Hinsdale Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
October, 1993 |
North Shore Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
September, 1994 |
Libertyville Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
October, 1995 |
Barrington Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
December, 1996 |
Crystal Lake Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
December, 1997 |
Northbrook Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
November, 2000 |
Advantage Bank (organized 2001) |
|
Acquired
|
|
October, 2003 |
Village Bank (organized 1995) |
|
Acquired
|
|
December, 2003 |
Beverly Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
April, 2004 |
Wheaton Bank (formerly Northview Bank; organized 1993) |
|
Acquired
|
|
September, 2004 |
Town Bank (organized 1998) |
|
Acquired
|
|
October, 2004 |
State Bank of The Lakes (organized 1894) |
|
Acquired
|
|
January, 2005 |
First Northwest Bank (organized 1995; merged into Village
Bank in May 2005) |
|
Acquired
|
|
March, 2005 |
Old Plank Trail Bank |
|
De novo
|
|
March, 2006 |
St. Charles Bank (formerly Hinsbrook Bank; organized 1987) |
|
Acquired
|
|
May, 2006 |
24
Following is a summary of the activity related to the expansion of the Companys banking franchise
since March 31, 2008:
2008 Banking Expansion Activity
|
|
|
Ø Vernon Hills, Illinois a branch of Libertyville Bank |
Managements ongoing focus is to balance further asset growth with earnings growth by seeking to
more fully leverage the existing capacity within each of the operating subsidiaries. One aspect of
this strategy is to continue to pursue specialized earning asset niches in order to maintain the
mix of earning assets in higher-yielding loans as well as diversify the loan portfolio. Another
aspect of this strategy is a continued focus on less aggressive deposit pricing at the Banks with
significant market share and more established customer bases.
Niche Lending
The Company conducts its niche lending through indirect non-bank subsidiaries and divisions of its
Banks.
First Insurance Funding Corporation (FIFC) is the Companys most significant specialized earning
asset niche, originating approximately $889 million in loan (premium finance receivables) during
the first quarter of 2009. FIFC makes loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they
pay on their commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through
independent medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States.
The insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial customers purchases of liability,
property and casualty and other commercial insurance. This lending involves relatively rapid
turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. Because of the indirect nature
of this lending and because the borrowers are located nationwide, this segment may be more
susceptible to third party fraud than relationship lending; however, management established various
control procedures to mitigate the risks associated with this lending. The majority of these loans
are purchased by the Banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans
generally provide the Banks with higher yields than alternative investments. However, excess FIFC
originations over the capacity to retain such loans within the Banks loan portfolios may be sold
to unrelated third parties with servicing retained.
On November 1, 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium Funding Corporation (Broadway).
Broadway is a commercial finance company that specializes in financing insurance premiums for
corporate entities. Its products are marketed through insurance agents and brokers to their small
to mid-size corporate clients primarily in the northeastern United States and California. On
October 1, 2008, Broadway merged with its parent, FIFC, but continues to utilize the Broadway brand
in serving its segment of the marketplace.
Additionally, in 2007, FIFC began to make loans to irrevocable life insurance trusts to purchase
life insurance policies for high net-worth individuals. The loans are originated through
independent insurance agents with assistance from financial advisors and legal counsel. The life
insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans can be secured with a
letter of credit or certificate of deposit.
Tricom Inc. (Tricom), operating since 1989, specializes in providing high-yielding, short-term
accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services, such as data
processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to clients in the temporary staffing
industry. Tricoms clients, located throughout the United States, provide staffing services to
businesses in diversified industries. These receivables may involve greater credit risks than
generally associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional community banks depending on the
marketability of the collateral. The principal sources of repayments on the receivables are
payments to borrowers from their customers who are located throughout the United States. Tricom
mitigates this risk by employing lockboxes and other cash management techniques to protect its
interests. Tricoms revenue principally consists of interest income from financing activities and
fee-based revenues from administrative services.
25
Wintrust Mortgage Corporation (WMC) (formerly WestAmerica Mortgage Company) engages in the
origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market. WMC sells
its loans with servicing released and does not currently engage in servicing loans for others. WMC
maintains principal origination offices in ten states, including Illinois, and originates loans in
other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. WMC provides the Banks with the ability
to use an enhanced loan origination and documentation system which allows WMC and each Bank to
better utilize existing operational capacity and expand the mortgage products offered to the Banks
customers. In December 2008, Wintrust Mortgage Corporation acquired certain assets and assumed
certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of Professional Mortgage Partners (PMP).
In addition to the earning asset niches provided by the Companys non-bank subsidiaries, several
earning asset niches operate within the Banks. Hinsdale Bank operates a mortgage warehouse lending
program that provides loan and deposit services to mortgage brokerage companies located
predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area, Crystal Lake Bank has a specialty in small aircraft
lending, Lake Forest Bank has a franchise lending program and Barrington Bank has the Community
Advantage program which provides lending, deposit and cash management services to condominium,
homeowner and community associations. The Company continues to pursue the development or
acquisition of other specialty lending businesses that generate assets suitable for bank investment
and/or secondary market sales.
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans.
This niche business served the Company well over the past twelve years in helping de novo banks
quickly, and profitably, grow into their physical structures. Competitive pricing pressures have
significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business. Given the current
economic environment and the retirement of the founder of this niche business, exiting the
origination of this business was deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company
will continue service its existing portfolio for the duration of the life of the existing credits.
Wealth Management
Wayne Hummer Investments LLC (WHI), a registered broker-dealer, provides a full-range of
investment products and services tailored to meet the specific needs of individual and
institutional investors throughout the country, but primarily in the Midwest. In addition, WHI
provides a full range of investment services to clients through a network of relationships with
unaffiliated community-based financial institutions located primarily in Illinois. Although
headquartered in Chicago, WHI also operates an office in Appleton, Wisconsin and has branch
locations in a majority of the Companys Banks.
Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company (WHAMC), a registered investment advisor, is the investment
advisory affiliate of WHI. WHAMC provides money management, financial planning and investment
advisory services to individuals and institutional, municipal and tax-exempt organizations. WHAMC
also provides portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide-range of pension and profit
sharing plans. In the second quarter of 2009, WHAMC purchased certain assets and assumed certain
liabilities of Advanced Investment Partners, LLC (AIP). AIP is an investment management firm
specializing in the active management of domestic equity investment strategies.
Wayne Hummer Trust Company (WHTC) was formed to offer trust and investment management services to
all communities served by the Banks. In addition to offering trust services to existing bank
customers at each of the Banks, WHTC targets small to mid-size businesses and affluent individuals
whose needs command the personalized attention offered by WHTCs experienced trust professionals.
Services offered by WHTC typically include traditional trust products and services, as well as
investment management services.
26
The following table presents a summary of the approximate amount of assets under administration
and/or management in the Companys wealth management operating subsidiaries as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
WHTC |
|
$ |
1,328,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,168,321 |
|
|
$ |
968,330 |
|
WHAMC (1) |
|
|
332,715 |
|
|
|
399,799 |
|
|
|
446,142 |
|
WHAMCs proprietary mutual funds |
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
7,311 |
|
|
|
13,115 |
|
WHI brokerage assets in custody |
|
|
3,700,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the proprietary mutual funds managed by WHAMC |
The decrease in assets under administration and/or management in the first quarter of 2009 was
primarily due to lower market valuations.
Treasury Capital Purchase Program
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) was signed into law.
Under the EESA, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the Treasury) has the authority to, among
other things, invest in financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing
liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. Pursuant to this authority, the Treasury announced its
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program (CPP), under which it is
purchasing senior preferred stock and warrants in eligible institutions to increase the flow of
credit to businesses and consumers and to support the economy.
On December 19, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the Treasury to participate in the
CPP, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant to Treasury, in
exchange for aggregate consideration of $250 million. Treasury is permitted to amend the agreement unilaterally in
order to comply with any changes in applicable federal statutes.
The preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays a cumulative dividend rate of five percent
per annum for the first five years and a rate of nine percent per annum after year five. The
preferred stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on certain matters that could amend
the rights of or adversely affect the stock. The preferred stock is redeemable after three years
with the approval of the appropriate federal banking agency. Prior to the end of three years, the
preferred stock may be redeemed with the proceeds from a qualifying equity offering of any Tier 1
perpetual preferred or common stock resulting in proceeds of not less than 25 percent of the issue
price of the preferred stock. The Treasury may transfer the preferred stock to a third party at any
time. Participation in the CPP restricts the Companys ability to increase dividends on its common
stock or to repurchase its common stock until three years have elapsed, unless (i) all of the
preferred stock issued to the Treasury is redeemed, (ii) all of the preferred stock issued to the
Treasury has been transferred to third parties, or (iii) the Company receives the consent of the
Treasury. In conjunction with the purchase of preferred stock, the Treasury received warrants to
purchase 1,643,295 shares of the Companys common stock for an aggregate market price of
$37,500,000. The warrant is immediately exercisable and has a ten year term.
In conjunction with the Companys participation in the CPP, the Company was required to adopt the
Treasurys standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during
which the Treasury holds equity issued under the CPP. These standards generally apply to the chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, plus the three most highly compensated executive
officers. In addition, the Company is required to not to deduct for tax purposes executive
compensation in excess of $500,000 for each senior executive.
In addition, participation in the CPP subjects the Company to increased oversight by the Treasury,
regulators and Congress. Under the terms of the CPP, the Treasury has the power to unilaterally
amend the terms of the purchase agreement to the extent required to comply with changes in
applicable federal law and to inspect corporate books and records through Wintrusts federal
banking regulator. In addition, the Treasury has the right to appoint two directors to the Wintrust
board if the Company misses dividend payments for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive,
on the preferred stock.
27
Congress has held hearings on implementation of TARP. On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of
Representatives approved legislation amending the TARP provisions of EESA to include quarterly
reporting requirements with respect to lending activities, examinations by an institutions primary
federal regulator of use of funds and compliance with program requirements, restrictions on
acquisitions by depository institutions receiving TARP funds, and authorization for Treasury to
have an observer at board meetings of recipient institutions, among other things. Although it is
unclear whether this legislation will be enacted into law, its provisions, or similar ones, may be
imposed administratively by the Treasury. In addition, Congress may adopt other legislation
impacting financial institutions that obtain funding under the CPP or changing lending practices
that legislators believe led to the current economic situation. Such provisions could restrict or
require changes to lending or governance practices or increase governmental oversight of
businesses. For additional discussion on this topic see Item 1. BusinessSupervision and
Regulation, beginning on page seven of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K and Item 1A. Risk
FactorsRecent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address difficult market and economic
conditions may not restore liquidity and stability to the United States financial system beginning
on page 21 of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
The Company may not redeem the preferred stock it sold to the Treasury prior to February 15, 2012
unless it has received aggregate gross proceeds from one or more qualified equity offerings (as
described below) equal to $62,500,000, which equals 25% of the aggregate liquidation amount of the
preferred stock the Company sold Treasury. If such qualified equity offerings are made, then the
Company may redeem the preferred stock in whole or in part, subject to the approval of the Federal
Reserve Board, upon notice as described below, up to a maximum amount equal to the aggregate net
cash proceeds received by us from such qualified equity offerings. A qualified equity offering is
a sale and issuance for cash by the Company, to persons other than the Company or its subsidiaries
after December 19, 2008, of shares of perpetual preferred stock, common stock or a combination
thereof, that in each case qualify as Tier 1 capital at the time of issuance under the applicable
risk-based capital guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board.
On or after February 15, 2012, the Company may redeem the preferred stock sold to the Treasury at
any time, in whole or in part, subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board and the notice
requirements described below.
Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or the ARRA, financial institutions
that receive assistance under TARP may, subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal
banking agency, repay such assistance without regard to the waiting period and source requirements
described above. The ARRA further provides that in the event a recipient repays such assistance,
the Secretary of the Treasury will liquidate the warrants associated with such assistance at the
current market price. The shares of preferred stock and the warrant sold by Wintrust to the initial
selling security holder are subject to these provisions of the ARRA.
The Secretary of the Treasury has not yet published any detailed guidance on the repayment process.
Wintrust will evaluate its options as additional guidance becomes available.
28
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings Summary
The Companys key operating measures for 2009, as compared to the same period last year, are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Percentage (%) or |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Basis Point (bp) |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
|
|
(34) |
% |
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (1) |
|
|
101,209 |
|
|
|
86,314 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
64,782 |
|
|
|
61,742 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
(27) |
bp |
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Efficiency ratio (2) (4) |
|
|
74.10 |
|
|
|
71.12 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
$ |
9,732,466 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
6,874,916 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
8,625,977 |
|
|
|
7,483,582 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,502 |
|
|
|
249,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
753,293 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
32.64 |
|
|
|
31.97 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
34.95 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (5) |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
18 |
bp |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income. |
|
(2) |
|
See following section titled, Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional
information on this performance measure/ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total
non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that periods total average
assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent
net revenue (less securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient
revenue generation. |
|
(5) |
|
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for lending-related commitments. |
Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, and quarterly growth rates are annualized in this
presentation and throughout this report to represent an annual time period. This is done for
analytical purposes to better discern for decision-making purposes underlying performance trends
when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, balance sheet growth rates are
most often expressed in terms of an annual rate. As such, 5% growth during a quarter would
represent an annualized growth rate of 20%.
29
Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios
The accounting and reporting polices of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry.
However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and
measure the Companys performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including
its individual components), net interest margin (including its individual components) and the
efficiency ratio. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the
Companys financial information with a more meaningful view of the performance of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Companys operating efficiency. Other financial
holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company
and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. In this non-GAAP
presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an
equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising
from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the
calculation of the Companys efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by
dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or
losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses
are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational
expenses.
A reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios used by the Company to
evaluate and measure the Companys performance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(A) Interest income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
122,079 |
|
|
$ |
136,176 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Liquidity management assets |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income FTE |
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
|
$ |
136,900 |
|
(B) Interest expense (GAAP) |
|
|
57,297 |
|
|
|
74,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
$ |
62,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B) |
|
$ |
64,782 |
|
|
$ |
61,742 |
|
(D) Net interest margin (GAAP) |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
Net interest margin FTE |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP) |
|
|
74.54 |
% |
|
|
71.71 |
% |
Efficiency ratio FTE |
|
|
74.10 |
% |
|
|
71.12 |
% |
|
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States and prevailing practices of the banking industry.
Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain
policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions and judgments, and as such have a greater possibility that changes in those estimates
and assumptions could produce financial results that are materially different than originally
reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the
financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event, are
based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as
information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions.
Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective
or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management currently
views critical accounting policies to include the determination of the allowance for loan losses
and the allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the
valuations
30
required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative
instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex
judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. For
a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see Summary of Critical
Accounting Policies beginning on page 36 of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
Net Income
Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 totaled $6.4 million, a decrease of $3.3 million,
or 34%, compared to the $9.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008. As compared to the
$2.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008, net income increased $4.4 million, or 225%.
On a per share basis, net income for the first quarter of 2009 totaled $0.06 per diluted common
share, a decrease of $0.34 per share, or 85%, as compared to the 2008 first quarter total of $0.40
per diluted common share. Contributing to the 85% decrease in earnings per diluted common share in
the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 were $5.0 million of preferred
share dividends which reduced net income available to common shareholders. Compared to the fourth
quarter of 2008, net income per diluted share in the first quarter of 2009 increased by $0.04, or
200%.
Significant items affecting the first quarter of 2009 results include higher mortgage banking
revenues and the increase in market value of collateralized mortgage obligations in the Companys
trading portfolio, offset by a higher provision for credit losses, higher levels of mortgage
banking commissions and preferred share dividends paid, and lower levels of option income. The
return on average equity for the first quarter of 2009 was 0.70%, compared to 5.25% for the prior
year first quarter and 0.22% for the fourth quarter of 2008.
31
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which represents the difference between interest income and fees on earning
assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is the major source of earnings for the
Company. Interest rate fluctuations and the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin represents
tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of the average earning assets during the period.
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to the first quarter of 2008 (linked quarters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
1,839,161 |
|
|
$ |
15,499 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
$ |
1,391,400 |
|
|
$ |
17,346 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
26,403 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
7,924,849 |
|
|
|
107,045 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
7,012,642 |
|
|
|
119,153 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
9,786,138 |
|
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
$ |
8,430,445 |
|
|
$ |
136,900 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(72,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
107,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
903,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
869,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,373,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
7,747,879 |
|
|
$ |
45,953 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
$ |
6,747,980 |
|
|
$ |
61,430 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,982 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
426,911 |
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
301,894 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
332,019 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,506 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
249,635 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
8,805,261 |
|
|
$ |
57,297 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
$ |
7,831,545 |
|
|
$ |
74,434 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
733,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
124,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,061,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,373,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
980,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
598,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,466 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning
deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects
a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The
total adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $620,000 and
$724,000, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
|
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net
free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
32
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended March 31, 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 totaled $65.4 million, an
increase of $2.9 million, or 5%, as compared to the $62.5 million recorded in the same quarter of
2008. For the first quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was 2.71%, down 27 basis points when
compared to the net interest margin of 2.98% in the same quarter of 2008.
The yield on total earning assets was 5.08% for the first quarter of 2009 and 6.53% in the first
quarter of 2008. The first quarter 2009 yield on loans was 5.48%, a 135 basis point decrease when
compared to the prior year first quarter yield of 6.83%. The yield on liquidity management assets
in the first quarter of 2009 was 3.42% compared to 5.01% in the first quarter of 2008.
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.64% in the first quarter of 2009 and 3.82% in
the first quarter of 2008. The interest-bearing deposit rate in the first quarter of 2009 declined
125 basis points to 2.41% from a rate of 3.66% in the same quarter in 2008.
The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes
payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, decreased to
4.32% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 4.79% in the first quarter of 2008. The Company
utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the Banks, manage
capital, manage its interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.
The higher level of interest income in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of
2008 was offset by continued margin compression. The Company has made progress in shifting its mix
of retail deposits away from certificates of deposit into lower cost, more variable rate NOW,
savings, money market and wealth management deposits. Interest rate compression on large portions
of NOW, savings and money market accounts as the Federal Reserve quickly lowered rates prevented
these deposits from repricing at the same magnitude as variable rate earning assets. Management
believes opportunities for increasing spreads in the commercial and commercial real estate
portfolio should help mitigate the effects of interest rate spread compression on variable rate
retail deposits and the unprecedented competitive retail deposit pricing given the current economic
conditions that have hindered net interest margin expansion. The average loan-to-average deposit
ratio decreased to 93% in the first quarter of 2009 from 95% in the first quarter of 2008. This
has been due to the Companys ability to raise deposits at a faster rate than loans through
competitive products, including its MaxSafe® deposit accounts, which provide customers
with expanded FDIC insurance coverage by spreading a customers deposit across its fifteen bank
charters. This product differentiates the Companys Banks from many of its competitors that have
consolidated their bank charters into one charter with multiple branches.
33
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to the fourth quarter of 2008 (sequential quarters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
1,839,161 |
|
|
$ |
15,499 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
$ |
1,607,707 |
|
|
$ |
18,455 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
21,630 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
7,924,849 |
|
|
|
107,045 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
7,455,418 |
|
|
|
107,744 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
9,786,138 |
|
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
$ |
9,084,755 |
|
|
$ |
126,413 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(72,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
107,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
903,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,060,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
7,747,879 |
|
|
$ |
45,953 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
$ |
7,271,505 |
|
|
$ |
50,740 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,982 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
439,432 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
301,894 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
379,914 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
73,364 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,506 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
249,520 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
8,805,261 |
|
|
$ |
57,297 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
$ |
8,413,735 |
|
|
$ |
63,073 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
733,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
124,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,061,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,060,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
980,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
671,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,340 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a
tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total
adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $620,000 and for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 was $594,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
|
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free
funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended December 31, 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 totaled $65.4 million, an
increase of $2.1 million, or 3%, as compared to the $63.3 million recorded in the fourth quarter of
2008. For the first quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was 2.71%, down seven basis points
when compared to the fourth quarter of 2008.
The yield on total earning assets for the first quarter of 2009 was 5.08% as compared to the 5.54%
in the fourth quarter of 2008. The first quarter of 2009 yield on loans was 5.48%, a 27 basis
point decrease when compared to the fourth quarter 2008 yield of 5.75%. The yield on liquidity
management assets in the first quarter of 2009 was 3.42% compared to 4.57% in the fourth quarter of
2008.
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.64% in the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to 2.98% in the fourth quarter of 2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased
in the first quarter of 2009 to 2.41% compared to 2.78% in the fourth quarter of 2008.
34
The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes
payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, increased to
4.32% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 4.26% in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company
utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the Banks, manage
capital, manage interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.
The higher level of net interest income recorded in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2008 was attributable to increasing credit spreads on new loan volumes and the
ability to raise interest-bearing deposits at more reasonable rates and strong earning asset
growth. Average earning asset growth of $701.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2008 was comprised of $469.4 million of loan growth and $231.5 million of liquid
management asset growth. This growth was primarily funded by a $476.4 million increase in the
average balances of interest-bearing liabilities and an increase in the average balance of net free
funds of $309.9 million. Management believes opportunities during 2009 for continuing to increase
credit spreads in the loan portfolio and favorable repricing of maturing retail certificates of
deposit should help offset the effects of any additional interest rate spread compression on
variable rate retail deposits and the unprecedented competitive retail deposit pricing given the
current economic conditions that have hindered net interest margin expansion.
Analysis of Changes in Tax-equivalent Net Interest Income
The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the Companys tax-equivalent net
interest income comparing the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The reconciliations set forth the
changes in the tax-equivalent net interest income as a result of changes in volumes, changes in
rates and differing number of days in each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
|
Compared to |
|
|
Compared to |
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
of 2008 |
|
|
of 2008 |
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income for comparative period |
|
$ |
62,466 |
|
|
$ |
63,340 |
|
Change due to mix and growth of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (volume) |
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
6,758 |
|
Change due to interest rate fluctuations (rate) |
|
|
(7,386 |
) |
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
Change due to number of days in each period |
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period
ended March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Non-interest Income
For the first quarter of 2009, non-interest income totaled $36.4 million and increased $11.9
million, or 48%, compared to the first quarter of 2008. The increase for the quarter was primarily
attributable to higher mortgage banking revenue and trading income. Offsetting increases in these
categories were lower levels of fees from covered call options, lower wealth management revenue,
lower gains on sales of premium finance receivables and higher OTTI charges.
The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Brokerage |
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
5,038 |
|
|
$ |
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Trust and asset management |
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wealth management |
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
10,136 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
(4,782 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Trading income |
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
NM |
Administrative services |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
13,015 |
|
|
|
8,430 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
24,572 |
|
|
$ |
11,855 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not Meaningful
Wealth management is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of WHTC and the asset
management fees, brokerage commissions, trading commissions and insurance product commissions at
WHI and WHAMC. Wealth management totaled $5.9 million in the first quarter of 2009 and decreased
$1.9 million, or 25%, compared to the same period in 2008. Decreased asset valuations due to the
equity market declines over the past 12 months have hindered the revenue growth from trust and
asset management activities. Continued uncertainties surrounding the equity markets overall have
slowed the growth of the brokerage component of wealth management revenue.
Mortgage banking includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and servicing
residential real estate loans for the secondary market. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, this
revenue source totaled $16.2 million, an increase of $10.1 million when compared to the first
quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to $12.5 million from gains recognized on
loans sold to the secondary market offset by $2.4 million from changes in the fair market value of
mortgage servicing rights, valuation fluctuations of mortgage banking derivatives, fair value
accounting for certain residential mortgage loans held for sale and increased recourse obligation
reserves for loans previously sold. Future growth of mortgage banking is impacted by the interest
rate environment and current residential housing conditions and will continue to be dependent upon
both. Mortgages originated and sold totaled over $1.2 billion in the first quarter of 2009
compared to $263 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $427 million in the first quarter of
2008. The positive impact of the PMP transaction, completed at the end of 2008, contributed to
mortgage banking in the first quarter of 2009.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2009, an increase
of $597,000, or 25%, when compared to the same quarter of 2008. The majority of deposit service
charges relates to customary fees on overdrawn accounts and returned items. The level of service
charges received is substantially below peer group levels, as management believes in the philosophy
of providing high quality service without encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.
36
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables results from the Companys sales of premium finance
receivables to unrelated third parties. Wintrust did not sell any premium finance receivables in
the first quarter of 2009 but recognized $322,000 of gains in the first quarter of 2009 on clean-up
calls of previous sales. Wintrust sold $114.8 million of premium finance receivables in the first
quarter of 2008, recognizing $1.1 million of net gains. Sales of these receivables in future
quarters are dependent upon an improvement in the market conditions impacting both sales of these
loans and the opportunity for securitizing these loans as well as liquidity and capital management
considerations.
On May 1, 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that beginning in
late June, securities backed by insurance premium finance loans used to finance property and
casualty insurance will be eligible collateral under the U.S. Treasurys Term Asset-Backed
Securities Loan Facility (TALF). The Company is currently evaluating the TALF program as it
relates to the possibility of utilizing a portion of its premium finance production as security for
loans under this program.
The Company continues to maintain an interest in the loans sold and establishes a servicing asset,
interest only strip and a recourse obligation upon each sale. Recognized gains, recorded in
accordance with SFAS 140, as well as the Companys retained interests in these loans are based on
the Companys projection of cash flows that will be generated from the loans. The cash flow model
incorporates the amounts contractually due from customers, including an estimate of late fees, the
amounts due to the purchaser of the loans, fees paid to agents as well as estimates of the terms of
the loans and credit losses. Significant differences in actual cash flows and the projected cash
flows can cause impairment to the servicing asset and interest only strip as well as adjustments to
the recourse obligation. The Company typically makes a clean up call by repurchasing the remaining
loans in the pools sold after approximately ten months from the sale date. Upon repurchase, the
loans are recorded in the Companys premium finance receivables portfolio and any remaining balance
of the Companys retained interest is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale of premium
finance receivables. The Company continuously monitors the performance of the loan pools to the
projections and adjusts the assumptions in its cash flow model when warranted.
At March 31, 2009 and 2008, premium finance receivables sold and serviced for others for which the
Company retained a recourse obligation related to credit losses totaled $9.2 million and $247.7
million, respectively. The recourse obligation is estimated in computing the net gain on the sale
of the premium finance receivables. At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the recourse obligation carried in
other liabilities was approximately $47,000 and $263,000, respectively. Credit losses incurred on
loans sold are applied against the recourse obligation liability that is established at the date of
sale. Credit losses, net of recoveries, in the first three months of 2009 and 2008 for premium
finance receivables sold and serviced for others, totaled $34,000 and $5,400, respectively. At
March 31, 2009, non-performing loans related to this sold portfolio were approximately $1.3 million
of the sold loans. Ultimate losses on premium finance receivables are substantially less than the
non-performing loans for the reasons noted in the Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables
portion of the Asset Quality section of this report.
The Company recognized $2.0 million of net losses on available-for-sale securities in the first
quarter of 2009 compared to net losses of $1.3 million in the prior year quarter. For the quarters
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively,
of OTTI charges on certain corporate debt investment securities. See Note 4 of the Financial
Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details of OTTI charges.
Other non-interest income totaled $13.0 million for the first quarter of 2009, an increase of $4.6
million, or 54%, when compared to the same quarter of 2008. Trading income increased $8.7 million,
with the largest component being an $8.1 million increase in market value of collateralized
mortgage obligations. The Company purchased these securities at a significant discount during the
first quarter of 2009. These securities then increased in value due to market spreads tightening
during the quarter and the increased speeds of mortgage prepayments due to favorable mortgage rate
environment and resultant refinancing activity taking place in the market. Miscellaneous income
benefited comparatively in the current quarter as the first quarter of 2008 included a $0.9 million
OTTI charge on certain investment partnerships. Offsetting these increases was a $4.8 million
decrease in fees from certain covered call option transactions. During the first quarter of 2009,
call option contracts were written against $110 million of underlying securities compared to $853
million in the first quarter of 2008. The same security may be included in this total more than
once to the extent that multiple option contracts were written against it if the initial option
contracts were not exercised. The Company writes call options with terms of less than three months
against certain U.S. Treasury and agency securities held in its portfolio for liquidity and other
purposes. These call option transactions are
37
designed to increase the total return associated with the investment securities portfolio and do
not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. There were no outstanding call options at March 31,
2009, December 31, 2008 or March 31, 2008. Management has been able to effectively use the
proceeds from selling covered call options to offset net interest margin compression and
administers such sales in a coordinated process with the Companys overall asset/liability
management. In the first quarter of 2009, higher than acceptable security pricing limited revenue
from the Companys covered call strategy.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2009 totaled $77.0 million and increased
approximately $14.1 million, or 22%, from the first quarter of 2008.
The following table presents non-interest expense by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
44,820 |
|
|
$ |
36,672 |
|
|
$ |
8,148 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions 3rd party brokers |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Postage |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Stationery and supplies |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
OREO expenses, net |
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
NM |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
14,213 |
|
|
|
9,731 |
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
76,962 |
|
|
$ |
62,849 |
|
|
$ |
14,113 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits comprised 58% of total non-interest expense in the first quarters of
2009 and 2008. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $8.1 million, or 22%, in the first
quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of higher commission
and incentive compensation expenses related to mortgage banking activities and the incremental
costs of the PMP staff. The large increase in salaries and employee benefits is attributable to an
increase in variable pay (commissions) of $4.7 million primarily as a result of the higher mortgage
loan origination volumes, $2.0 million of increased base salary and employee benefits as a result
of the PMP acquisition and $1.4 million from seasonal base pay and employee benefits increases.
The combined equipment and occupancy expense for the first quarter of 2009 was $10.1 million, an
increase of $335,000, or 3%, compared to the same period of 2008.
Professional fees include legal, audit and tax fees, external loan review costs and normal
regulatory exam assessments. Professional fees for the first quarter of 2009 were $2.9 million, an
increase of $815,000, or 39%, compared to the same period of 2008. This increase is primarily a
result of increased legal costs related to non-performing loans.
38
FDIC insurance totaled $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2009, an increase of $1.7 million, or
134%, compared to $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. The FDIC increased deposit insurance
rates at the beginning of 2009 in response to current economic conditions.
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses in the first quarter of 2009 increased $2.3 million
compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due losses on sales of OREO properties in
the current quarter.
Miscellaneous expense includes expenses such as ATM expenses, correspondent bank charges,
directors fees, telephone, travel and entertainment, corporate insurance and dues and
subscriptions. Miscellaneous expenses in the first quarter of 2009 increased $518,000, or 9%,
compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a $252,000 increase in net lending
origination costs.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $5.2
million in the first quarter of 2008. The effective tax rate was 34.9% in both of these quarterly
periods.
Operating Segment Results
As described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Companys operations consist
of three primary segments: banking, specialty finance and wealth management. The Companys
profitability is primarily dependent on the net interest income, provision for credit losses,
non-interest income and operating expenses of its banking segment. The net interest income of the
banking segment includes interest income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were
purchased from the specialty finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability
analysis, management reviews the results of its specialty finance segment as if all loans
originated and sold to the banking segment were retained within that segments operations.
Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment,
management allocates the net interest income earned by the banking segment on deposit balances of
customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management segment. (See Wealth
management deposits discussion in Deposits section of this report for more information on these
deposits.)
The banking segments net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 totaled $61.8
million as compared to $60.7 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of $1.1 million, or
2%. This increase primarily attributed to increasing credit spreads on new loan volumes and the
ability to raise interest-bearing deposits at more reasonable rates and strong earning asset
growth. The banking segments non-interest income totaled $23.5 million in the first quarter of
2009, an increase of $6.2 million, or 36%, when compared to the first quarter of 2008 total of
$17.3 million. This increase was primarily a result of higher mortgage banking revenue in the
first quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The banking segments net
income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 totaled $5.8 million, a decrease of $8.7 million, or
60%, as compared to the first quarter of 2008 total of $14.5 million. This decrease was primarily
the result of a higher provision for credit losses in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the
same period in the prior year.
Net interest income for the specialty finance segment totaled $19.0 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $17.5 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of $1.5 million
or 8%. The specialty finance segments non-interest income totaled $804,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1.1 million or
57%. The decrease relates primarily to lower gains on the sale of premium finance receivables to
unrelated third parties. There were no sales of premium finance receivables in the first quarter
of 2009. Net after-tax profit of the specialty finance segment totaled $8.2 million and $8.5
million for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
39
The wealth management segment reported net interest income of $6.5 million for the first quarter of
2009 compared to $4.8 million in the same quarter of 2008. Net interest income is comprised of the
net interest earned on brokerage customer receivables at WHI and an allocation of the net interest
income earned by the banking segment on non-interest bearing and interest-bearing wealth management
customer account balances on deposit at the Banks (wealth management deposits). The allocated
net interest income included in this segments profitability was $6.3 million ($3.9 million after
tax) in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $4.5 million ($2.8 million after tax) in the first
quarter of 2008. The increase in net interest income was primarily a result of the growth in
average wealth management deposits. This segment recorded non-interest income of $8.0 million for
the first quarter of 2009 compared to $9.7 million for the first quarter of 2008. Decreased asset
valuations due to the equity market declines over the past 12 months have hindered the revenue
growth from trust and asset management activities. Continued uncertainties surrounding the equity
markets overall have slowed the growth of the brokerage component of wealth management revenue.
The wealth management segments net income totaled $3.1 million for the first quarter of 2009
compared to net income of $2.8 million for the first quarter of 2008.
40
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were $10.8 billion at March 31, 2009, representing an increase of $1.1 billion, or 11%
when compared to the $9.7 billion at March 30, 2008 and $160.6 million, or 6% on an annualized
basis, when compared to December 31, 2008. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and
advances, including the junior subordinated debentures, was $9.6 billion at March 31, 2009, $9.5
billion at December 31, 2008 and $8.6 billion at March 31, 2008. See Notes 4-8 of the Financial
Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for additional period-end detail on the Companys
interest-earning assets and funding liabilities.
Interest-Earning Assets
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and
the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans (4): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,826,474 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
4,688,857 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
$ |
4,469,377 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
909,948 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
869,581 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
686,681 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
451,127 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
315,168 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
329,220 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,410,727 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,229,447 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,127,110 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
165,143 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
187,478 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
237,519 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
161,430 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
164,887 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
162,735 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income(4) |
|
$ |
7,924,849 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
7,455,418 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
7,012,642 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
Liquidity management assets (2) |
|
|
1,839,161 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,607,707 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,391,400 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other earning assets (3) |
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets |
|
$ |
9,786,138 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
9,084,755 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,430,445 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,060,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,373,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets
to total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residential real estate loans include mortgage loans held-for-sale.
|
|
(2) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities
purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
|
|
(4) |
|
Loans include non-accrual loans. |
Total average earning assets for the first quarter of 2009 increased $1.4 billion, or 16%, to $9.8
billion, compared to the first quarter of 2008, and increased $701.4 million, or 31% on an
annualized basis, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. The ratio of total average earning assets
as a percent of total average assets at March 31, 2009 was 91%, up slightly from 90% in the prior
quarter and the first quarter of 2008.
Total average loans during the first quarter of 2009 increased $912.2 million, or 13%, over the
previous year first quarter. Average residential real estate loans increased 37%, home equity
loans increased 33%, premium finance receivables increased 25% and commercial and commercial real
estate loans increased 8% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the average balances in the
first quarter of 2008. The increase in average residential real estate loans is a result of higher
originations, primarily loan refinancing, by WMC. As a result of deteriorating economic conditions
and declining real estate values, the Company has been actively managing its home equity portfolio
to ensure that diligent pricing, appraisal and other underwriting activities continue to exist.
The Company has not sacrificed asset quality or pricing standards to grow outstanding loan
balances. The increase in the average balance of premium finance receivables is a result of the
Company not selling premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party in the first quarter of
2009. The Company sold $114.8 million of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party
in the first quarter of 2008. Currently, the receivables originated by FIFC are sold to the Banks
and retained in their portfolios. The level of premium finance receivables sold to unrelated third
parties depends in large part on the capacity of the Banks to retain such loans in their portfolio
and therefore, it is possible that sales of these receivables may occur in the future. The growth
of loans from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the current quarter of 2009 is the result of the
Companys continued business development efforts on its core loan portfolio. In the first quarter
of
41
2009, more than $2.7 billion of credit was extended to new and existing borrowers subsequent to the
U.S. Treasury Departments capital investment as part of the Capital Purchase Program.
As discussed in the Overview and Strategy section of this report, in the third quarter of 2008,
the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans. Therefore, the balance of
indirect consumer loans will continue to decrease in future periods.
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with
banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The balances of these
assets can fluctuate based on managements ongoing effort to manage liquidity and for asset
liability management purposes.
Other earning assets in the table include brokerage customer receivables and trading account
securities at WHI. Trading securities are also held at the Wintrust corporate level. In the
normal course of business, WHI activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of
various securities transactions. WHIs customer securities activities are transacted on either a
cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, WHI, under an agreement with the out-sourced
securities firm, extends credit to its customers, subject to various regulatory and internal margin
requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in customers accounts. In connection with
these activities, WHI executes and the out-sourced firm clears customer transactions relating to
the sale of securities not yet purchased, substantially all of which are transacted on a margin
basis subject to individual exchange regulations. Such transactions may expose WHI to
off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in volatile trading markets, in the event margin requirements
are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event a customer fails to
satisfy its obligations, WHI under an agreement with the outsourced securities firm, may be
required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the
customers obligations. WHI seeks to control the risks associated with its customers activities by
requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and
internal guidelines. WHI monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines,
requires customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.
Deposits
Total deposits at March 31, 2009, were $8.6 billion and increased $1.1 billion, or 15%, compared to
total deposits at March 31, 2008. See Note 6 to the financial statements of Item 1 of this report
for a summary of period end deposit balances.
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average deposit balances and the
relative percentage of total average deposits for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
733,911 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
705,616 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
642,917 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,061,271 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
994,082 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
977,905 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
787,913 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
626,057 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
642,126 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,243,468 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,070,117 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
753,399 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
367,734 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
317,360 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
307,091 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,287,493 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4,263,889 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
4,067,459 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
$ |
8,481,790 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,977,121 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,390,897 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of WHI, the trust and asset
management customers of WHTC and brokerage customers from unaffiliated companies which have been
placed into deposit accounts of the Banks (Wealth management deposits in the table above).
Consistent with reasonable interest rate risk parameters, the funds have generally been invested in
loan production of the Banks as well as other investments suitable for banks.
Total average deposits for the first quarter of 2009 were $8.5 billion, an increase of $1.1
billion, or 15%, from the first quarter of 2008. This increase was a result of marketing efforts
at the Banks to support loan growth. Total time certificates of deposit represented 51% of total
average deposits in the first quarter of 2009 and 55% in the first quarter of 2008.
42
Other Funding Sources
Although deposits are the Companys primary source of funding its interest-earning assets, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer
preferences and market competition. As a result, in addition to deposits and the issuance of
equity securities and the retention of earnings, the Company uses several other sources to fund
its asset base. These sources include short-term borrowings, notes payable, Federal Home Loan
Bank advances, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures. The Company evaluates the
terms and unique characteristics of each source, as well as its asset-liability management
position, in determining the use of such funding sources.
Average total interest-bearing funding, from sources other than deposits and including junior
subordinated debentures, totaled $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008.
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average other funding sources for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,010 |
|
|
$ |
63,155 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,982 |
|
|
|
439,432 |
|
|
|
426,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
47,153 |
|
|
|
7,994 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
296,855 |
|
|
|
297,751 |
|
|
|
260,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
300,894 |
|
|
|
344,904 |
|
|
|
268,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
73,364 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,506 |
|
|
|
249,520 |
|
|
|
249,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other funding sources |
|
$ |
1,057,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,142,230 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable balances represent the balances on a credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank.
This credit facility is available for corporate purposes such as to provide capital to fund growth
at existing bank subsidiaries, possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate
matters.
FHLB advances provide the Banks with access to fixed rate funds which are useful in mitigating
interest rate risk and achieving an acceptable interest rate spread on fixed rate loans or
securities.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements represent sweep accounts for certain customers in
connection with master repurchase agreements at the Banks and short-term borrowings from brokers.
This funding category fluctuates based on customer preferences and daily liquidity needs of the
Banks, their customers and the Banks operating subsidiaries.
The Company borrowed funds under three separate subordinated note agreements. The balances of the
notes as of March 31, 2009 were $20.0 million, $25.0 million and $25.0 million with maturity dates
in 2012, 2013 and 2015, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments of
$5.0 million beginning in the sixth year of the note and has terms of ten years. These notes
qualify as Tier II regulatory capital.
Junior subordinated debentures were issued to nine trusts by the Company and equal the amount of
the preferred and common securities issued by the trusts. Junior subordinated debentures, subject
to certain limitations, currently qualify as Tier I regulatory capital. Interest expense on these
debentures is deductible for tax purposes, resulting in a cost-efficient form of regulatory
capital.
See Notes 7 and 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details of
period end balances and other information for these various funding sources. There were no material
changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Companys contractual obligations during the
first quarter of 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.
43
Shareholders Equity
Total shareholders equity was $1.1 billion at March 31, 2009, reflecting an increase of $309.9
million since March 31, 2008 and a decrease of $3.3 million since the end of 2008. The decrease
from December 31, 2008, was the result of $4.6 million in higher net unrealized losses from
available-for-sale securities and the mark-to-market adjustment on cash flow hedges, net of tax,
net income of $6.4 million less $5.0 million of preferred stock dividends offset by $789,000 of
amortization of the preferred stock, and common stock dividends of $4.3 million, partially offset
by $1.8 million credited to surplus for stock-based compensation costs and a $1.7 million increase
in equity from the issuance of shares of the Companys common stock (and related tax benefit)
pursuant to various stock compensation plans.
The following tables reflect various consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and
the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Bank for a bank holding company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Total average equity-to-total average assets * |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
based on quarterly average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Adequately |
|
Well |
|
|
Requirements |
|
Capitalized |
|
Capitalized |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
The Companys principal sources of funds at the holding company level are dividends from its
subsidiaries, borrowings under its loan agreement with an unaffiliated bank and proceeds from the
issuances of subordinated debt, junior subordinated debentures and additional equity. Refer to
Notes 7 and 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further
information on these various funding sources. The issuances of subordinated debt, junior
subordinated debentures, preferred stock and additional common stock are the primary forms of
regulatory capital that are considered as the Company evaluates increasing its capital position.
Management is committed to maintaining the Companys capital levels above the Well Capitalized
levels established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.
See Note 14 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details on the
Companys issuance of preferred stock in 2008 through a private transaction and also under the U.S.
Department of the Treasurys Capital Purchase Program.
In January 2009, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 per common share. It was
paid on February 26, 2009 to shareholders of record as of February 12, 2009. In January and July
2008, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 per common share.
44
ASSET QUALITY
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
69,767 |
|
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
7,890 |
|
|
|
3,957 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
5,411 |
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(9,992 |
) |
|
|
(5,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at period-end |
|
$ |
74,248 |
|
|
$ |
53,758 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments at period-end |
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at period-end |
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
|
$ |
54,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs by category as a percentage
of its own respective categorys average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for
credit losses |
|
|
69.04 |
% |
|
|
60.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at period-end |
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
6,874,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at
period-end |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans
at period-end |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
45
Management believes that the loan portfolio is well diversified and well secured, without undue
concentration in any specific risk area. Loan quality is continually monitored by management and is
reviewed by the Banks Boards of Directors and their Credit Committees on a monthly basis.
Independent external reviews of the loan portfolio are provided by the examinations conducted by
regulatory authorities and an independent loan review performed by an entity engaged by the Board
of Directors. The amount of additions to the allowance for loan losses, which is charged to
earnings through the provision for credit losses, is determined based on managements assessment of
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management evaluates on at least a quarterly basis
a variety of factors, including actual charge-offs during the year, historical loss experience,
delinquent and other potential problem loans, and economic conditions and trends in the market area
in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company refined its methodology for determining certain elements
of the allowance for loan losses. These refinements resulted in an allocation of the allowance to
loan portfolio groups based on loan collateral and credit risk rating and did not have a material
impact on the allowance as compared to the previous methodology. Previously, this element of the
allowance was not segmented at the loan collateral and credit risk rating level. The Company
maintains its allowance for loan losses at a level believed adequate by management to absorb
probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and is based on the size and current risk
characteristics of the loan portfolio, an assessment of internal problem loan identification system
(Problem Loan Report) loans and actual loss experience, changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio, historical loss experience, changes in lending policies and procedures, including
underwriting standards and collections, charge-off, and recovery practices, changes in experience,
ability and depth of lending management and staff, changes in national and local economic and
business conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments and
changes in the volume and severity of past due and classified loans and trends in the volume of
non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications. The allowance for
loan losses also includes an element for estimated probable but undetected losses and for
imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate the allowance. The Company reviews
non-performing loans on a case-by-case basis to allocate a specific dollar amount of reserves,
whereas all other loans are reserved for based on loan collateral and assigned credit risk rating
reserve percentages. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective as it requires
significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired
loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current environmental factors and economic trends, all of which may be susceptible
to significant change. The Company also maintains an allowance for lending-related commitments
which relates to certain amounts that the Company is committed to lend but for which funds have not
yet been disbursed and is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the
allowance for loan losses. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries are
credited to the allowance. A provision for credit losses is charged to operations based on
managements periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent
factors. Evaluations are conducted at least quarterly and more frequently if deemed necessary.
The provision for credit losses totaled $14.5 million for the first quarter of 2009, $14.5 million
in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $8.6 million for the first quarter of 2008. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, net charge-offs totaled $10.0 million compared to $9.9 million in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and $5.2 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008. On a ratio basis,
annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans were 0.51% in the first quarter of
2009, 0.53% in the fourth quarter of 2008, and 0.30% in the first quarter of 2008. Higher
provision and net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2009, compared to the same period in the
prior year, primarily resulted from real estate valuations on residential and commercial real
estate construction and land development related loans which have become distressed due to lack of
sales activity and other factors.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for inherent losses in the
portfolio. There can be no assurances however, that future losses will not exceed the amounts
provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. The amount of future additions to
the allowance for loan losses will be dependent upon managements assessment of the adequacy of the
allowance based on its evaluation of economic conditions, changes in real estate values, interest
rates, the regulatory environment, the level of past-due and non-performing loans, and other
factors. The increase from the end of the prior quarter reflects the continued economic weaknesses
in the Companys markets and is the result of an individual review of a significant number of
individual credits as well as the overall risk factors impacting certain types of credits,
specifically credits with residential development collateral valuation exposure.
46
Past Due and Non-performing Loans
The following table sets forth Wintrusts non-performing loans at the dates indicated. The
information in the table should be read in conjunction with the detailed discussion following the
table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity (1) |
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
8,557 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
9,722 |
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
8,133 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
Total past due greater than 90 days and still accruing |
|
|
16,482 |
|
|
|
25,385 |
|
|
|
17,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity (1) |
|
|
9,209 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
3,655 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
136,397 |
|
|
|
91,814 |
|
|
|
51,233 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
12,694 |
|
|
|
11,454 |
|
|
|
13,542 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual |
|
|
159,384 |
|
|
|
110,709 |
|
|
|
68,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity (1) |
|
|
9,935 |
|
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
141,355 |
|
|
|
106,564 |
|
|
|
59,790 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
22,416 |
|
|
|
20,793 |
|
|
|
21,675 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
175,866 |
|
|
$ |
136,094 |
|
|
$ |
86,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of
its own respective categorys period end balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity (1) |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.44 |
% |
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of non-performing loans |
|
|
42.22 |
% |
|
|
51.26 |
% |
|
|
62.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residential real estate and home equity loans that are non-accrual and past due
greater than 90 days and still accruing do not include non-performing mortgage loans
held-for-sale. These balances totaled $0 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively, and $2.1 million as of March 31, 2008. Mortgage loans held-for sale are carried
at either fair value or at the lower of cost or market applied on an aggregate basis by loan
type. Charges related to adjustments to record the loans at fair value are recognized in
mortgage banking revenue. |
Non-performing Residential Real Estate and Home Equity
The non-performing residential real estate and home equity loans totaled $9.9 million as of March
31, 2009. The balance increased $5.9 million from March 31, 2008 and increased $2.8 million from
December 31, 2008. The March 31, 2009 non-performing balance is comprised of $4.9 million of
residential real estate (20 individual credits) and $5.0 million of home equity loans (23
individual credits). On average, this is approximately three non-performing residential real
estate loans and home equity loans per chartered bank within the Company. The Company believes
control and collection of these loans is very manageable. At this time, management believes
reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of
these credits.
47
Non-performing Commercial, Consumer and Other
The commercial, consumer and other non-performing loan category totaled $141.4 million as of March
31, 2009 compared to $106.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and $59.7 million as of March 31, 2008.
Management is pursuing the resolution of all credits in this category. However, given the current
state of the residential real estate market, resolution of certain credits could span a lengthy
period of time until market conditions stabilize. At this time, management believes reserves are
adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.
Non-performing Loan Composition
The $151.3 million of non-performing loans as of March 31, 2009 classified as residential real
estate and home equity, commercial, consumer, and other consumer consists of $52.3 million of
residential real estate construction and land development related loans, $51.5 million of
commercial real estate construction and land development related loans, $23.9 million of
residential real estate and home equity related loans, $15.1 million of commercial real estate
related loans, $6.5 million of commercial related loans and $2.0 million of consumer related loans.
Sixteen of these relationships exceed $2.5 million in outstanding balances, approximating $93.8
million in total outstanding balances. At this time, management believes reserves are adequate to
absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.
Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables
The following table presents the level of non-performing premium finance receivables as of the
dates indicated, and the amount of net charge-offs for the quarterly periods then ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Non-performing premium finance receivables |
|
$ |
22,416 |
|
|
$ |
20,793 |
|
|
$ |
21,675 |
|
- as a percent of premium finance receivables
outstanding |
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs of premium finance receivables |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,131 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
- annualized as a percent of average premium
finance receivables |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
|
As noted below, fluctuations in this category may occur due to timing and nature of account
collections from insurance carriers. The Companys underwriting standards, regardless of the
condition of the economy, have remained consistent. We anticipate that net charge-offs and
non-performing asset levels in the near term will continue to be at levels that are within
acceptable operating ranges for this category of loans. Management is comfortable with
administering the collections at this level of non-performing premium finance receivables.
The ratio of non-performing premium finance receivables fluctuates throughout the year due to the
nature and timing of canceled account collections from insurance carriers. Due to the nature of
collateral for premium finance receivables it customarily takes 60-150 days to convert the
collateral into cash collections. Accordingly, the level of non-performing premium finance
receivables is not necessarily indicative of the loss inherent in the portfolio. In the event of
default, Wintrust has the power to cancel the insurance policy and collect the unearned portion of
the premium from the insurance carrier. In the event of cancellation, the cash returned in payment
of the unearned premium by the insurer should generally be sufficient to cover the receivable
balance, the interest and other charges due. Due to notification requirements and processing time
by most insurance carriers, many receivables will become delinquent beyond 90 days while the
insurer is processing the return of the unearned premium. Management continues to accrue interest
until maturity as the unearned premium is ordinarily sufficient to pay-off the outstanding balance
and contractual interest due.
48
Non-performing Indirect Consumer Loans
Total non-performing indirect consumer loans were $2.2 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $1.6
million at December 31, 2008 and $1.0 million at March 31, 2008. The ratio of these non-performing
loans to total indirect consumer loans was 1.40% at March 31, 2009 compared to 0.90% at December
31, 2008 and 0.45% at March 31, 2008. As noted in the Allowance for Credit Losses table, net
charge-offs as a percent of total indirect consumer loans were 0.81% for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 compared to 0.36% in the same period in 2008.
At the beginning of the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect
automobile loans. This niche business served the Company well over the past 12 years in helping
de-novo banks quickly, and profitably, grow into their physical structures. Competitive pricing
pressures significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business. Given
the current economic environment and the retirement of the founder of this niche business, exiting
the origination of this business was deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company
will continue to service its existing portfolio during the duration of the credits.
Other Real Estate Owned
The table below presents a summary of other real estate owned as of March 31, 2009 and shows the
changes in the balance from December 31, 2008 for each property type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
6,907 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
21,712 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
32,572 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Transfers at fair value |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21,520 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolved |
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11,080 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,487 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
8,281 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
28,422 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
4,814 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
|
= number of individual properties |
|
R |
|
= number of relationships |
Credit Quality Review Procedures
The Company utilizes a loan rating system to assign risk to loans and utilizes that risk rating
system to assist in developing the Problem Loan Report as a means of reporting non-performing loans
and potential problem loans. At each scheduled meeting of the Boards of Directors of the Banks and
the Wintrust Risk Management Committee, a Problem Loan Report is presented, showing loans that are
non-performing and loans that may warrant additional monitoring. Accordingly, in addition to those
loans disclosed under Past Due and Non-performing Loans, there are certain loans in the portfolio
which management has identified, through its Problem Loan Report, which exhibit a higher than
normal credit risk. These Problem Loan Report credits are reviewed individually by management.
However, these loans are still performing and, accordingly, are not included in non-performing
loans. Managements philosophy is to be proactive and conservative in assigning risk ratings to
loans and identifying loans to be on the Problem Loan Report. The principal amount of loans on the
Companys Problem Loan Report (exclusive of those loans reported as non-performing) as of March 31,
2009, December 31, 2008, and March 31, 2008 totaled $296.7 million, $246.6 million and $157.6
million, respectively. The increase from March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 is
primarily a result of Problem Loan Report credits in the commercial and commercial real estate
category. These loans are currently performing.
49
LIQUIDITY
Wintrust manages the liquidity position of its banking operations to ensure that sufficient funds
are available to meet customers needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. The liquidity to meet
these demands is provided by maturing assets, liquid assets that can be converted to cash and the
ability to attract funds from external sources. Liquid assets refer to money market assets such as
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with banks, as well as available-for-sale debt
securities which are not pledged to secure public funds. The Company believes that it has
sufficient funds and access to funds to meet its working capital and other needs.
Please refer to the Interest-Earning Assets, Deposits, Other Funding Sources and Shareholders
Equity discussions of this report for additional information regarding the Companys liquidity
position.
INFLATION
A banking organizations assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of
inflation do not have as great an impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in
interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at the same percentage as
inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the
Company. An analysis of the Companys asset and liability structure provides the best indication
of how the organization is positioned to respond to changing interest rates. See Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks section of this report for additional information.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws.
Forward-looking information in this document can be identified through the use of words such as
may, will, intend, plan, project, expect, anticipate, should, would, believe,
estimate, contemplate, possible, and point. Forward-looking statements and information are
not historical facts, are premised on many factors, and represent only managements expectations,
estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict,
which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed in
Item 1A on page 20 of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K. The Company intends such forward-looking
statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes
of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include,
among other things, statements relating to the Companys projected growth, anticipated improvements
in earnings, earnings per share and other financial performance measures, and managements
long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on financial
results of condition from expected developments or events, the Companys business and growth
strategies, including anticipated internal growth, plans to form additional de novo banks and to
open new branch offices, and to pursue additional potential development or acquisitions of banks,
wealth management entities or specialty finance businesses. Actual results could differ materially
from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
Competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of
the Companys loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth
management services). |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the interest rate environment, which may influence, among other things, the
growth of loans and deposits, the quality of the Companys loan portfolio, the pricing of
loans and deposits and net interest income. |
|
|
|
|
The extent of defaults and losses on the Companys loan portfolio, which may require
further increases in its allowance for credit losses. |
|
|
|
|
Distressed global credit and capital markets. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to obtain liquidity and income from the sale of premium
finance receivables in the future and the unique collection and delinquency risks
associated with such loans. |
|
|
|
|
Legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial
services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services
companies. |
50
|
|
|
Failure to identify and complete acquisitions in the future or unexpected difficulties
or unanticipated developments related to the integration of acquired entities with the
Company. |
|
|
|
Significant litigation involving the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Companys strategy
of de novo bank formations and openings. De novo banks typically require over 13 months of
operations before becoming profitable, due to the impact of organizational and overhead
expenses, the startup phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in
redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning
assets. |
|
|
|
|
The loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to
complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank. |
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the
banking and financial services industries. |
|
|
|
|
The risk that the terms of the U.S. Treasury Departments Capital Purchase Program could
change. |
|
|
|
|
The effect of continued margin pressure on the Companys financial results. |
|
|
|
|
Additional deterioration in asset quality. |
|
|
|
|
Additional charges related to asset impairments. |
|
|
|
|
The other risk factors set forth in the Companys filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |
Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these
forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of Wintrust. Any such statement speaks only as of
the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement.
The Company undertakes no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements or
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q. Persons are advised, however, to
consult any further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the
SEC and in its press releases.
51
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of
fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a
reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of
yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in
conjunction with the boards of directors of the Banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk
Management Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. The policies establish guidelines for
acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in
interest rates.
Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are
different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in
disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Companys
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The
Company continuously monitors not only the organizations current net interest margin, but also the
historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse
changes in net interest income in future years as a result interest rate fluctuations by performing
simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse change in net
interest margin and/or net income is identified, management would take appropriate actions with its
asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse situations. Please refer to Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further
discussion of the net interest margin.
Since the Companys primary source of interest bearing liabilities is from customer deposits, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by
customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the Banks operate. The
rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Companys interest earning assets result primarily
from the Companys strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit
its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an
acceptable interest rate spread.
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the
Risk Management Committees of the boards of directors of the Banks and the Company. The objective
is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial
instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income.
Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates using many different interest rate
scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized is to measure the percentage change in net interest
income assuming a ramped increase and decrease of 100 and 200 basis points that occurs in equal
steps over a twelve-month time horizon. Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk
of the Company, expressed as a percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time
horizon due to changes in interest rates, at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 |
|
|
+ 100 |
|
|
- 100 |
|
|
- 200 |
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
Points |
|
|
Points |
|
|
Points |
|
|
Points |
|
Percentage change
in net interest
income due to a
ramped 100 and 200
basis point shift
in the yield curve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(0.1) |
% |
|
|
(2.4) |
% |
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.3) |
% |
|
|
(4.2) |
% |
|
|
(6.7) |
% |
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.6) |
% |
|
|
(6.5) |
% |
|
This simulation analysis is based upon actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance
sheet instruments and incorporates managements projections of the future volume and pricing of
each of the product lines offered by the Company as well as other pertinent assumptions. Actual
results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest
rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.
52
One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into
derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments
with similar characteristics. Additionally, the Company enters into commitments to fund certain
mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments
for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors. See Note 10 of the Financial
Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further information on the Companys
derivative financial instruments.
During the first three months of 2009, the Company also entered into certain covered call option
transactions related to certain securities held by the Company. The Company uses these option
transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such as interest
rate floors) to increase the total return associated with the related securities. Although the
revenue received from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income,
the increased return attributable to the related securities from these options contributes to the
Companys overall profitability. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk may be impacted by
these transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate term debt or use
financial derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding as of March 31,
2009.
53
ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under their supervision, with the participation of
other members of management as they deemed appropriate, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as contemplated by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in
all material respects, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (and
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the periodic reports the Company is
required to file and submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
54
PART II Other Information
Item 1A: Risk factors
There were no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors
in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
No purchases of the Companys common shares were made by or on behalf of the Company or any
affiliated purchaser as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, during the three months ended March 31, 2009. There is currently no authorization to
repurchase shares of outstanding common stock.
The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Series B Preferred Stock was issued provides that no
share repurchases may be made until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of
issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series B Preferred Stock has
been redeemed in whole or the US Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to
third parties. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued on December 19, 2008.
Item 6: Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
10.1 |
|
Eighth Amendment dated as of May 11, 2009 to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005,
between Wintrust Financial Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 11, 2009
|
|
/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
David L. Stoehr
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
56