Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

¨    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2007

OR

¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                .

Commission file number: 1-6311

 

 

Tidewater Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   72-0487776

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

601 Poydras St., Suite 1900

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(504) 568-1010

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or of such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer   x                                     Accelerated filer  ¨                                    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   ¨     No   x

There were 52,586,432 shares of Tidewater Inc. common stock, $.10 par value per share, outstanding on January 4, 2008. Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and par value data)

 

      December 31,
2007
   March 31,
2007

ASSETS

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 228,602    393,806

Trade and other receivables, net

     320,667    286,808

Marine operating supplies

     44,205    44,902

Other current assets

     6,859    6,033
           

Total current assets

     600,333    731,549
           

Investments in, at equity, and advances to unconsolidated companies

     23,485    24,423

Properties and equipment:

     

Vessels and related equipment

     2,829,525    2,609,324

Other properties and equipment

     81,967    51,955
           
     2,911,492    2,661,279

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     1,244,493    1,179,182
           

Net properties and equipment

     1,666,999    1,482,097
           

Goodwill

     328,754    328,754

Other assets

     91,127    82,475
           

Total assets

   $ 2,710,698    2,649,298
           

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     

Current liabilities:

     

Current maturities on capitalized lease obligations

     36,217    2,194

Accounts payable

     79,542    75,217

Accrued expenses

     62,673    45,880

Accrued property and liability losses

     5,973    6,130

Other current liabilities

     35,206    17,259
           

Total current liabilities

     219,611    146,680
           

Long-term debt

     300,000    300,000

Capitalized lease obligations

     —      19,712

Deferred income taxes

     186,356    179,687

Accrued property and liability losses

     13,995    15,510

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     123,751    101,699

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Common stock of $.10 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized, issued 52,585,099 shares at December and 57,476,898 shares at March

     5,259    5,748

Other stockholders’ equity

     1,861,726    1,880,262
           

Total stockholders’ equity

     1,866,985    1,886,010
           

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 2,710,698    2,649,298
           

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2


TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
 
     2007     2006     2007     2006  

Revenues:

        

Vessel revenues

   $ 310,670     280,491     900,929     810,490  

Other marine revenues

     3,545     7,422     37,814     21,222  
                          
     314,215     287,913     938,743     831,712  
                          

Costs and expenses:

        

Vessel operating costs

     148,731     123,997     429,578     366,327  

Costs of other marine revenues

     1,747     6,544     32,979     18,406  

Depreciation and amortization

     31,123     29,912     89,156     86,272  

General and administrative

     31,112     24,924     93,304     72,591  

Gain on sales of assets

     (660 )   (8,803 )   (9,692 )   (39,955 )
                          
     212,053     176,574     635,325     503,641  
                          
     102,162     111,339     303,418     328,071  

Other income (expenses):

        

Foreign exchange loss

     (159 )   (468 )   (543 )   (1,202 )

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated companies

     3,141     1,879     10,252     7,704  

Interest income and other, net

     4,077     5,103     13,779     13,385  

Interest and other debt costs

     (1,535 )   (2,464 )   (5,713 )   (7,389 )
                          
     5,524     4,050     17,775     12,498  
                          

Earnings before income taxes

     107,686     115,389     321,193     340,569  

Income taxes

     18,316     21,980     57,815     71,520  
                          

Net earnings

   $ 89,370     93,409     263,378     269,049  
                          

Basic earnings per common share

   $ 1.67     1.69     4.80     4.80  
                          

Diluted earnings per common share

   $ 1.66     1.67     4.76     4.75  
                          

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     53,498,846     55,211,834     54,896,999     56,034,160  

Incremental common shares from stock options

     315,409     604,569     403,158     613,952  
                          

Adjusted weighted average common shares

     53,814,255     55,816,403     55,300,157     56,648,112  
                          

Cash dividends declared per common share

   $ 0.15     0.15     0.45     0.45  
                          

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended
December 31,
 
     2007     2006  

Operating activities:

    

Net earnings

   $ 263,378     269,049  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     89,156     86,272  

Provision for deferred income taxes

     3,018     6,329  

Gain on sales of assets

     (9,692 )   (39,955 )

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies, net of dividends

     (5,840 )   (3,807 )

Compensation expense - stock-based

     8,714     6,144  

Excess tax benefits on stock options exercised

     (4,335 )   (3,134 )

Changes in assets and liabilities, net:

    

Trade and other receivables

     (33,784 )   (20,987 )

Marine operating supplies

     697     (2,393 )

Other current assets

     (826 )   (988 )

Accounts payable

     3,908     3,240  

Accrued expenses

     15,848     9,383  

Accrued property and liability losses

     (232 )   (217 )

Other current liabilities

     19,699     13,101  

Other, net

     3,367     10,846  
              

Net cash provided by operating activities

     353,076     332,883  
              

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from sales of assets

     61,201     67,731  

Additions to properties and equipment

     (291,709 )   (173,350 )

Repayment of advances to unconsolidated companies

     —       9,496  

Other

     —       635  
              

Net cash used in investing activities

     (230,508 )   (95,488 )
              

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Debt borrowings

     —       5,000  

Principal payments on debt

     —       (5,000 )

Principal payments on capitalized lease obligations

     (19,565 )   (398 )

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     43,580     11,837  

Stock repurchases

     (291,147 )   (131,735 )

Cash dividends

     (24,975 )   (25,529 )

Excess tax benefits on stock options exercised

     4,335     3,134  
              

Net cash used in financing activities

     (287,772 )   (142,691 )
              

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

     (165,204 )   94,704  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     393,806     246,109  
              

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 228,602     340,813  
              

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Cash paid during the period for:

    

Interest

   $ 9,791     7,127  

Income taxes

   $ 41,962     55,054  

Non-cash financing activities:

    

Capitalized leases

   $ 33,876     11,020  
              

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


TIDEWATER INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented herein have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated as required by Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the respective full years. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2007.

(2) Stockholders’ Equity

At December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, zero and 1,210,612 shares, respectively, of common stock were held in a grantor stock ownership plan trust for the benefit of stock-based employee benefits programs. These shares are not included in common shares outstanding for earnings per share calculations and transactions between the company and the trust, including dividends paid on the company’s common stock, are eliminated in consolidating the accounts of the trust and the company.

(3) Common Stock Repurchase Program

In July 2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $200.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, to fund the share repurchases. The repurchase program will end on the earlier of the date that all authorized funds have been expended or June 30, 2008, unless extended by the Board of Directors. For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the company expended $116.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,282,200 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $51.00. At December 31, 2007, approximately $22.5 million was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the July 2007 authorized stock repurchase program. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, the company used $291.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 4,925,600 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $59.11.

In July 2006, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $157.9 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2007. From inception of the July 2006 authorized repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2007, the company used $154.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,560,500 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $60.17. The company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, the company used $40.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 867,100 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $46.57.

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2006. From inception of the repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2006, the company expended $112.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,396,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $46.79. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, the company expended $91.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 1,941,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $47.06.

 

5


(4) Income Taxes

The effective tax rate applicable to pre-tax earnings for the quarter and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was 17.01% and 18.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate applicable to pre-tax earnings for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 was 19% and 21%, respectively. The reduction in the effective tax rate during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 is a result of the company’s proportionally greater profitability being derived from international operations, and what is expected to be derived from international operations for the remainder of this fiscal year, where statutory income tax rates are generally lower than those applicable to the U.S. operations.

Effective April 1, 2007, the company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns.

The implementation of FIN 48 resulted in the company recording an additional $18.9 million of tax liabilities, including penalty and interest of $3.8 million, a reduction to equity method investments of $5.4 million, including penalties and interest of $2.6 million, and a corresponding decrease to stockholders’ equity of $24.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The company’s balance sheet at March 31, 2007 reflects $13.1 million of tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions. The liabilities are attributable to the IRS disallowance of all claimed deductions from taxable income related to the company’s Foreign Sales Corporation and the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion for fiscal years 1999 through 2007, a permanent establishment issue related to a foreign joint venture and a tax audit of a foreign subsidiary. In addition, the company has $11.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to a state tax issue, including interest of $0.7 million. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $52.0 million as of December 31, 2007. These gross unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if realized. Penalties and interest related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense.

On January 9, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana issued its final ruling in the company’s favor with respect to a motion for summary judgment concerning the IRS disallowance of the company’s tax deduction for foreign sales corporation commissions for fiscal years 1999 and 2000. The company expects the IRS to appeal the verdict. Although the timeline for future appeals, if any, and the ultimate settlement of the liability is unpredictable, it is reasonably possible that these uncertainties will be resolved within the next twelve months. The company has approximately $27.8 million of tax liabilities recorded at December 31, 2007, with respect to this issue, which includes liabilities recorded for similar deductions taken in years subsequent to fiscal 2000, that would be reversed should these uncertainties ultimately be resolved in the company’s favor.

With limited exceptions, the company is no longer subject to tax audits by state, local or foreign taxing authorities for years prior to 2000. The company has ongoing examinations by various state and foreign tax authorities and does not believe that the results of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations although resolution of outstanding audit issues could reduce reported tax expense and the related effective tax rate.

(5) Employee Benefit Plans

A defined benefit pension plan covers certain U.S. citizen employees and employees who are permanent residents of the United States. Benefits are based on years of service and employee compensation levels. In addition, the company also offers a supplemental retirement plan (supplemental plan) that provides pension benefits to certain employees in excess of those allowed under the company’s tax-qualified pension plan. The company contributed $0.3 million and $1.0 million to the defined benefit pension plan during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, and expects to contribute an additional $0.3 million to the plan during the remainder of the current fiscal year. The company contributed $2.8 million to the supplemental plan during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 and does not expect to make a contribution during the remainder of the current fiscal year. The company contributed $6.0 million to

 

6


the supplemental plan during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 and contributed $0.3 million and $0.9 million to the defined benefit pension plan during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, respectively.

Qualified retired employees currently are covered by a program that provides limited health care and life insurance benefits. Costs of the program are based on actuarially determined amounts and are accrued over the period from the date of hire to the full eligibility date of employees who are expected to qualify for these benefits.

The net periodic benefit cost for the company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plan and the supplemental plan (referred to collectively as “Pension Benefits”) and the postretirement health care and life insurance plan (referred to collectively as “Other Benefits”) is comprised of the following components:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
 

(In thousands)

   2007     2006     2007     2006  

Pension Benefits:

        

Service cost

   $ 297     232     891     696  

Interest cost

     1,052     918     3,156     2,754  

Expected return on plan assets

     (638 )   (628 )   (1,914 )   (1,884 )

Amortization of prior service cost

     6     15     18     45  

Recognized actuarial loss

     488     331     1,464     993  
                          

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 1,205     868     3,615     2,604  
                          

Other Benefits:

        

Service cost

   $ 342     323     1,026     969  

Interest cost

     458     413     1,374     1,239  

Amortization of prior service cost

     (547 )   (550 )   (1,641 )   (1,650 )

Recognized actuarial loss

     339     387     1,017     1,161  
                          

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 592     573     1,776     1,719  
                          

(6) Sale of Vessels

In August 2006, the company entered into an agreement to sell 14 of its offshore tugs. The company sold 11 of its offshore tugs in August 2006 for a total cash price of $34.8 million. The culmination of this transaction resulted in an approximate $28.2 million pre-tax financial gain, or approximately $17.2 million after tax, or $0.31 per diluted common share after tax. The company sold the additional three offshore tugs during the quarter ended December 31, 2006, for a total sales price of $8.9 million. The culmination of the entire transaction resulted in an approximate $34.0 million pre-tax financial gain ($28.0 million was recorded in second quarter and $6.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007), or approximately $20.8 million after tax ($17.1 million in the second quarter and $3.7 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007), or $0.37 per diluted common share after tax ($0.30 in the second quarter and $0.07 during the third quarter of fiscal 2007).

(7) Contingencies

Certain current and former subsidiaries of the company are, or have been, participating employers in an industry-wide multi-employer retirement fund in the United Kingdom, the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (MNOPF.) The company has been informed of a fund deficit that will require contributions from the participating employers. Substantially all of the fund’s deficit allocable to the company relates to current operating subsidiaries as the company does not believe, on the advice of counsel, that it is liable for any additional portion of the fund’s deficit that relates to subsidiaries that have either been sold or dissolved in prior years. The amount of the company’s share of the fund’s deficit will depend ultimately on a number of factors including an updated calculation of the total fund deficit, the number of participating employers, and the final method used in allocating the required contribution among participating employers. In August 2005, the company received an invoice from the fund in the amount of $3.8 million for what the trustees calculated

 

7


to be the company’s then current share of the fund deficit. Accordingly, the company recorded this amount in full as crew cost expense during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. As allowed by the terms of the assessment, approximately $0.5 million and $0.7 million of the invoiced amount was paid during fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively with the remainder, including interest charges, to be paid in annual installments over the next eight years. The annual installment payments are paid in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and, as such, no amounts were paid during the nine month period ended December 31, 2007.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the company provided an additional $3.5 million of crew costs expense due to the finalization of the pension fund’s 2006 actuarial evaluation. The first installment on the additional $3.5 million of $0.5 million was paid in October 2007 with the remaining $3.0 million due over the next seven years.

In the future, the fund’s trustee may claim that the company owes additional amounts for various reasons, including the results of future fund valuation reports and whether other assessed parties have the financial capability to contribute their respective allocations.

The company has previously reported that special counsel selected by the Audit Committee is conducting an internal investigation into certain practices of a third party customs agent used by the company’s Nigerian affiliate in procuring temporary importation permits necessary for the company’s vessels to operate in Nigeria, as well as a review of certain other practices, transactions and third-party marketing relationships in other foreign jurisdictions where the company has operations, all for the purpose of determining whether such practices raise any compliance concerns under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The investigation is ongoing, with special counsel that is leading the investigation providing periodic progress reports to the Audit Committee.

The company continues to use alternative procedures that it adopted after the commencement of the FCPA investigation to obtain Nigerian temporary import permits. These procedures are designed to assure FCPA compliance and have proven to be serviceable for the time being. However, the possibility still exists that the company may have to curtail or cease its operations in Nigeria if these alternative procedures prove not to be sustainable or if a more permanent solution is not identified and implemented. It is the company’s view that, in Nigeria and certain other jurisdictions, changes in local law and regulations are desirable, and may be necessary, in order to provide greater transparency and efficiency, as well as to give greater assurance as to compliance with applicable laws. While the company continues to press for a more permanent solution, to date such a solution has not been developed, and the company can give no assurance that satisfactory longer-term solutions will become available. The company has noted that other oil service companies operating in these jurisdictions have announced their own internal FCPA compliance issues with respect to the temporary importation regime in Nigeria, and believes that these and other companies are confronted with many of the same FCPA compliance issues that the company has identified. The company is hopeful that the recognition that this is an oil service industry, and not a company-specific, issue, will continue to increase, and will ultimately lead to changes in local law and practices that will resolve any compliance concerns going forward.

The company currently has 24 vessels working in Nigeria. For the period from October 1, 2007 through January 31, 2008, the company processed new or extended temporary importation permits for 11 of these 24 vessels using its alternative procedures. The time periods for which these more recent permits have been granted has varied from as little as three months up to a year, and this lack of consistency and predictability has only served to further demonstrate the desirability of a more permanent solution; however, it is reasonable to expect that the company will continue to need to file applications for new or extended temporary importation permits on a reasonably frequent basis. In addition, the company used the alternative procedures to obtain new temporary importation permits for three additional vessels that are currently scheduled to relocate from other areas to commence work in Nigeria prior to March 31, 2008.

The company has a firm commitment to its compliance program. The company has strong, worldwide customer relationships and a mobile fleet, and it is prepared to redeploy vessels to other markets as necessary to assure the vessels are utilized to the fullest extent possible consistent with that commitment.

 

8


As previously reported, the company has voluntarily disclosed its internal review to both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Department of Justice to advise both agencies that an internal investigation is underway and indicated that it will cooperate fully with both agencies. That cooperation is continuing. Special counsel has provided and will continue to provide interim updates to these agencies, and has provided and will continue to provide certain information requested by the Department of Justice and the Commission. The company is unable to predict whether either agency will separately investigate this matter, or what potential remedies or sanctions, if any, these agencies may seek.

Based on the information obtained to date in the investigation, the company does not believe that any potential liability that may result from an investigation or enforcement action by the Department of Justice or the Commission is either probable or reasonably estimable, and, thus, no accrual has been recorded as of December 31, 2007. Should additional information be obtained, the company will record a provision when the amount is both probable and reasonably estimable.

For information on the impact that the internal investigation has had on the conclusions of the company and its chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer and its chief financial officer regarding the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls, see Item 4 of Part I of this Form 10-Q.

The company has been made a defendant in several lawsuits in various areas of the world where its marine vessel operations are conducted, including a class action styled suit in California, alleging certain labor and wage and hour law violations claimed by certain current and former employees. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the company provided $3.0 million for a court-approved settlement of the California wage issue, which is inclusive of interest and attorney fees. As of December 31, 2007, $2.5 million remains accrued and unpaid. Plaintiffs to the class action suit had until January 14, 2008, to submit a notice of claim and according to the company’s legal counsel, the majority of plaintiffs have responded to the settlement and the matter is expected to close in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. No additional accruals are needed for this matter.

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose or may arise in the future in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

(8) New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160) which establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, SFAS No. 160 requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years and will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling interests including any that arose before the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The company is assessing SFAS No. 160 and has not determined yet the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on its results of operations or financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141R), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the

 

9


liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to enable financial statement users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS No. 159). This statement provides companies an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No.159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The company is assessing SFAS No. 159 and has not determined yet the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its results of operations or financial position, or whether it will choose to elect the option to report certain assets at fair value.

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The company is assessing SFAS No. 157 and has not determined yet the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its results of operations or financial position.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB that are adopted by the company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

(9) Subsequent Events

On January 31, 2008, the company’s Board of Directors approved the expansion of the company’s current share repurchase program by an additional $50 million. The expanded authorized repurchase program, which now has available approximately $72.5 million (consisting of $22.5 million from the previously authorized program and $50 million of additional authorization), will end on the earlier of the date that all authorized funds have been expended or June 30, 2008, unless extended by the Board of Directors. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, to fund the share repurchases.

Subsequent to December 31, 2007, the company committed to the construction of eight additional deepwater platform supply vessels for a total aggregate cost of approximately $202.0 million. The vessels, which are being built at an international shipyard, are expected to be delivered to the market beginning in September 2010 with final delivery of the last vessel in June 2012.

 

10


(10)

Segment and Geographic Distribution of Operations

The company follows SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” and operates in two business segments: United States and International. The following table provides a comparison of revenues, operating profit, depreciation and amortization, and additions to properties and equipment for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Vessel revenues and operating costs relate to vessels owned and operated by the company while other marine services relate to the activities of the company’s shipyards, brokered vessels and other miscellaneous marine-related businesses.

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
 
(In thousands)    2007     2006     2007     2006  

Revenues:

        

Vessel revenues:

        

United States

   $ 36,702     56,552     122,957     180,632  

International

     273,968     223,939     777,972     629,858  
                          
     310,670     280,491     900,929     810,490  

Other marine revenues

     3,545     7,422     37,814     21,222  
                          
   $ 314,215     287,913     938,743     831,712  
                          

Marine operating profit:

        

Vessel activity:

        

United States

   $ 2,497     22,788     22,677     75,073  

International

     107,138     85,948     297,818     230,862  
                          
     109,635     108,736     320,495     305,935  

Gain on sales of assets

     660     8,803     9,692     39,955  

Other marine services

     1,681     749     4,459     2,461  
                          

Operating profit

   $ 111,976     118,288     334,646     348,351  
                          

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated companies

     3,141     1,879     10,252     7,704  

Interest and other debt costs

     (1,535 )   (2,464 )   (5,713 )   (7,389 )

Corporate general and administrative

     (9,417 )   (6,560 )   (30,418 )   (19,103 )

Other income

     3,521     4,246     12,426     11,006  
                          

Earnings before income taxes

   $ 107,686     115,389     321,193     340,569  
                          

Depreciation and amortization:

        

Marine equipment operations

        

United States

   $ 4,908     6,644     13,804     19,312  

International

     25,822     23,099     74,240     66,475  

General corporate depreciation

     393     169     1,112     485  
                          
   $ 31,123     29,912     89,156     86,272  
                          

Additions to properties and equipment:

        

Marine equipment operations

        

United States

   $ 16,608     17,722     41,105     50,527  

International

     58,648     19,767     273,608     108,918  

General corporate

     —       7,626     10,872     13,905  
                          
   $ 75,256     45,115     325,585     173,350  
                          

 

11


The following table provides a comparison of total assets at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007:

 

(In Thousands)    December 31,
2007
   March 31,
2007

Total assets:

     

Marine:

     

United States

   $ 433,598    591,855

International

     1,941,220    1,564,928
           
     2,374,818    2,156,783

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated Marine companies

     23,485    24,423
           
     2,398,303    2,181,206

General corporate

     312,395    468,092
           
   $ 2,710,698    2,649,298
           

 

12


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Tidewater Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated May 24, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on April 1, 2006. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana

February 4, 2008

 

13


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Forward Looking Information and Cautionary Statement

In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the company notes that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated herein by reference contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect the company’s current view with respect to future events and financial performance. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and the company’s future results of operations could differ materially from historical results or current expectations. Some of these risks are discussed in this report, and include, without limitation, fluctuations in oil and gas prices; fleet additions by competitors and industry overcapacity; changes in capital spending by customers in the energy industry for exploration, development and production; changing customer demands for different vessel specifications which may make some of our vessels technologically obsolete for certain customer projects or in certain markets; acts of terrorism; significant weather conditions; unsettled political conditions, war, civil unrest and governmental actions, especially in higher risk countries of operations; foreign currency fluctuations; and environmental and labor laws.

Forward-looking statements, which can generally be identified by the use of such terminology as “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “believe,” “think,” “could,” “continue,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” and similar expressions contained in this report, are predictions and not guarantees of future performance or events. Any forward-looking statements are based on current industry, financial and economic information, which the company has assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes. The company’s actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk factors listed above and discussed in Items 1, 1A, 2 and 7 included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 25, 2007 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Management disclaims any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

In addition, in certain places in this report, we refer to published reports of analysts that purport to describe trends or developments in energy production and drilling and exploration activity. The company does so for the convenience of our stockholders and in an effort to provide information available in the market that will assist the company’s investors in a better understanding of the company’s business. However, the company specifically disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such information and undertakes no obligation to update such information.

Overview

The company provides services and equipment to the global offshore energy industry through the operation of a diversified fleet of marine service vessels. Revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are dependent upon the activity level of the vessel fleet that is ultimately dependent upon oil and natural gas prices that, in turn, are determined by the supply/demand relationship for crude oil and natural gas. The following information contained in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and related disclosures and the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2007.

General Market Conditions and Results of Operations

Offshore service vessels provide a diverse range of services and equipment to the energy industry. The company’s revenues and operating profit are primarily driven by fleet size, vessel utilization and day rates because operating costs and depreciation do not change proportionally when revenue changes. Operating costs primarily consist of crew costs, repair and maintenance, insurance and loss reserves, fuel, lube oil and supplies. Fleet size and utilization are the major factors which affect crew costs. The timing and amount of repair and maintenance costs are influenced by customer demands, vessel age and drydockings to satisfy

 

14


safety and inspection requirements mandated by regulatory agencies. Drydocking costs are only incurred if economically justified, taking into consideration the vessel’s age, physical condition and future marketability. If the required drydocking is not performed, the vessel is either stacked or sold as it cannot work without the proper certifications. Although a certain number of drydockings are required over a given period to meet regulatory requirements, the timing of these drydockings within that period is largely under the control of the company. When the company takes productive vessels out of service for drydockings, the company incurs not only the drydocking cost but also the loss of revenue from that vessel during the drydock period. In any given quarter, downtime associated with drydockings and major repairs and maintenance can have a significant effect on the company’s revenue stream and on vessel utilization rates. Fuel and lube costs can fluctuate in any given quarter depending on the number of mobilizations that occur in any given period.

The company also incurs vessel operating costs which are aggregated under the “other” vessel operating cost heading. These costs consist of brokers’ commissions, training costs and other type costs. Brokers’ commission costs are primarily incurred in the company’s international operations where brokers assist in obtaining work for the company’s vessels. Brokers are paid a percentage of day rates and, accordingly, as revenues increase so do commissions paid to brokers. Other type costs include but are not limited to satellite communication fees, agent fees, port fees, canal transit fees, vessel certification fees and temporary importation fees.

The following table compares revenues and operating expenses (excluding general and administrative expense, depreciation expense and gain on sales of assets) for the company’s vessel fleet for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. Vessel revenues and operating costs relate to vessels owned and operated by the company while other marine services relate to third-party activities of the company’s shipyards, brokered vessels and other miscellaneous marine-related activities.

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
December 31,
   Quarter
Ended
Sept 30,
(In thousands)    2007    2006    2007    2006    2007

Revenues:

              

Vessel revenues:

              

United States

   $ 36,702    56,552    122,957    180,632    43,183

International

     273,968    223,939    777,972    629,858    254,185
                          
     310,670    280,491    900,929    810,490    297,368

Other marine revenues

     3,545    7,422    37,814    21,222    21,678
                          
   $ 314,215    287,913    938,743    831,712    319,046
                          

Operating costs:

              

Vessel operating costs:

              

Crew costs

   $ 78,749    69,595    231,688    199,252    76,694

Repair and maintenance

     28,272    22,784    78,232    73,086    25,402

Insurance and loss reserves

     7,548    3,047    18,125    12,002    4,539

Fuel, lube and supplies

     12,713    11,285    36,198    33,426    12,169

Vessel operating leases

     1,308    522    3,039    1,140    965

Other

     20,141    16,764    62,296    47,421    22,538
                          
     148,731    123,997    429,578    366,327    142,307

Costs of other marine revenues

     1,747    6,544    32,979    18,406    19,485
                          
   $ 150,478    130,541    462,557    384,733    161,792
                          

 

15


The following table subdivides vessel operating costs presented above by the company’s United States and International segments for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
December 31,
   Quarter
Ended
Sept. 30,
(In thousands)    2007    2006    2007    2006    2007

Operating costs:

              

United States vessel operating costs:

              

Crew costs

   $ 15,144    16,997    47,999    49,151    16,019

Repair and maintenance

     5,294    2,961    12,979    13,380    3,752

Insurance and loss reserves

     2,645    2,010    6,653    7,100    1,713

Fuel, lube and supplies

     750    837    2,447    3,543    981

Vessel operating leases

     786    48    1,299    564    444

Other

     1,656    1,601    5,800    4,981    2,396
                          
     26,275    24,454    77,177    78,719    25,305

International vessel operating costs:

              

Crew costs

   $ 63,605    52,598    183,689    150,101    60,675

Repair and maintenance

     22,978    19,823    65,253    59,706    21,650

Insurance and loss reserves

     4,903    1,037    11,472    4,902    2,826

Fuel, lube and supplies

     11,963    10,448    33,751    29,883    11,188

Vessel operating leases

     522    474    1,740    576    521

Other

     18,485    15,163    56,496    42,440    20,142
                          
     122,456    99,543    352,401    287,608    117,002
                          

Total operating costs

   $ 148,731    123,997    429,578    366,327    142,307
                          

Marine support services are conducted worldwide with assets that are highly mobile. Revenues are principally derived from offshore service vessels, which regularly and routinely move from one operating area to another, often to and from offshore operating areas in different continents. Because of this asset mobility, revenues and long-lived assets attributable to the company’s international marine operations in any one country are not “material” as that term is defined by SFAS No. 131. However, any abrupt or catastrophic event that requires the company to quickly relocate a substantial number of vessels from one country to another area could result in a substantial loss of revenues until affected vessels can be redeployed and significant mobilization charges.

As a result of the uncertainty of a certain customer to make payment of vessel charter hire, the company has deferred the recognition of approximately $6.4 million of billings as of December 31, 2007 ($5.3 million of billings as of March 31, 2007), which would otherwise have been recognized as revenue. The company will recognize the amounts as revenue as cash is collected or at such time as the uncertainty has been significantly reduced.

The company’s consolidated net earnings for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 were comparable to the same period during fiscal 2007. Removing the effect of the company’s sale of 14 offshore tugs during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2007 resulted in an approximate 11% increase in consolidated net earnings during the current nine-month period versus the same period in fiscal 2007 primarily due to generating higher revenues on the company’s international-based vessels which were slightly offset by higher vessel operating costs and general and administrative expenses. The company’s sale of 14 offshore vessels resulted in an approximate $34.0 million pre-tax financial gain ($28.0 million was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and $6.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007), or approximately $20.8 million after tax.

The company’s United States (U.S.) revenues decreased approximately 32%, or $57.7 million, during the nine-months ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 while the company’s international revenues increased $148.1 million, or approximately 24%, during the same comparative period. A significant portion of the company’s operations are conducted internationally. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, revenues generated from international operations as a percentage of the

 

16


company’s total revenues were 84%. Net earnings for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 also benefited from the reduction in the company’s effective tax rate.

The company’s U.S. results of operations for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 decreased as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 due primarily to the sale of the company’s U.S.-based offshore tugs during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2007, the transfer of vessels to international areas of operations and reduced utilization and average day rates of the core group of U.S.-based vessels. Consistent with public reports, demand for vessels in the shallow water Gulf of Mexico offshore vessel market has diminished as repair work has been completed on the offshore energy infrastructure that was damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in August and September 2005, respectively, and numerous drilling rigs have relocated to international areas. The number of available drilling rigs in the U.S. market should continue to be the primary driver of the company’s future profitability in the U.S. market and, at present, the offshore rig count in the Gulf of Mexico remains at very low levels as compared to past industry up cycles. The strength of the international drilling market has attracted offshore rigs from the U.S. market over the past few years and this trend is expected to continue in the near term. Over the longer term, the company’s U.S.-based fleet should be affected more by the active offshore rig count in the United States than by any other single outside influence.

Worldwide rig construction continues as rig owners attempt to capitalize on the high worldwide demand for drilling. Over the next four years, the worldwide moveable drilling rig count will increase according to published reports which indicate that new-build rigs currently on order and under construction stand at approximately 162 rigs to supplement the current approximate 700 movable rigs worldwide. In addition, approximately 83 new floating production units are currently under construction, which are expected to be delivered over the next three to four years.

In addition to the increased activity in drilling rig construction, the worldwide offshore vessel market is also experiencing an increase in construction. Approximately 722 new-build vessels are expected to be delivered to the worldwide offshore vessel market within the next five years as reported by ODS-Petrodata. An increase in vessel capacity could result in increased competition in the company’s industry which may have the effect of lowering charter rates. However, the worldwide offshore marine vessel industry has a large number of aging vessels that are nearing or exceeding their original estimated economic lives. These older vessels could potentially retire from the market within the next few years if the cost of extending the vessels’ lives is not economically justifiable. Although the attrition rate of these aging vessels is unknown, the company believes that a reduction in worldwide vessel capacity would offset, at least in part, the potential effects the offshore marine industry may encounter when the new-build vessels are delivered to the market. Additionally, as reported above, over 162 new drilling and production support units and approximately 83 floating production units are expected to be added to the worldwide fleet over the next four years, that may, if fully utilized, create additional vessel demand and minimize the effects of the new-build vessels being added to the offshore support vessel fleet.

Commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas are critical factors in exploration and production (E&P) companies’ decision to retain their drilling rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico market or mobilize the rigs to more profitable international markets. Natural gas prices have strengthened since mid-November 2007 as inventory levels for the resource have decreased due to some production shut-ins, normal winter weather and lower liquid natural gas imports. However, inventory levels remain high by historical standards and most analysts estimate that winter ending inventory levels for natural gas will continue to be high despite recent draw downs, which will likely put downward pricing pressures on the resource towards the end of the first quarter of calendar year 2008, if the forecast materializes. The company’s U.S. results of operations are primarily driven by natural gas exploration and production and, given the relative volatility and uncertainty in natural gas pricing, it is unknown how U.S.-based vessel demand will be affected.

While all of these factors create uncertainty as to the immediate future activity level of the U.S. vessel market, the company’s assets are highly mobile and should the U.S. market weaken further, the company has the ability to redeploy its vessels to international markets where the vessels may benefit from strong average day rates and earnings taxed at statutory income tax rates that are typically lower than in the United States. In reaction to rigs departing the Gulf of Mexico during the latter part of calendar year 2006, the company relocated 16 vessels to international areas during fiscal 2007 and an additional five vessels

 

17


during the nine months ended December 31, 2007 where the vessels were contracted for more attractive term work at generally higher day rates than what the vessels were achieving in the Gulf of Mexico. The company will continue to assess the demand for vessels in the Gulf and consider relocating additional vessels to stronger international areas as necessary.

Oil and gas industry analysts are reporting in their 2008 E&P expenditures surveys that global capital expenditures budgets for E&P are forecast to increase between 9% and 11% over calendar year 2007 levels. The surveys forecast that international capital spending budgets will increase between 12% to 16% due to strong crude oil prices while a modest 3% to 6% increase is expected in North American capital spending budgets due to uncertainty in natural gas prices.

The strength in the company’s international-based results of operations during the nine months ended December 31, 2007 can be attributed to higher average day rates and an increase in the number of vessels operating internationally. Average day rates for the total international-based fleet increased approximately 21% during the first nine months of fiscal 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007. The company’s international results of operations have been primarily dependent on the supply and demand relationship of crude oil. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, crude oil prices exceeded the $90 per barrel mark and stayed above this price point for the majority of the quarter. Analysts expect future crude oil prices to remain at strong price levels during calendar year 2008 and well beyond due to high global consumer demand for crude oil which is driven by emerging economies, dwindling excess OPEC production capacity, continuing concerns over possible supply interruptions caused by geopolitical risk in certain countries that are members of OPEC and production declines in mature oil fields. Management anticipates international vessel demand will remain strong as long as crude oil prices remain at levels that would support E&P companies continuing to expend their anticipated E&P spending budgets.

Marine operating profit and other components of earnings before income taxes for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 consist of the following:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
     Quarter
Ended
Sept 30,
 

(In thousands)

   2007     2006     2007     2006      2007  

Vessel activity:

           

United States

   $ 2,497     22,788     22,677     75,073      9,815  

International

     107,138     85,948     297,818     230,862      94,770  
                                 
     109,635     108,736     320,495     305,935      104,585  

Gain on sales of assets (A)

     660     8,803     9,692     39,955      2,102  

Other marine services

     1,681     749     4,459     2,461      2,043  
                                 

Operating profit

     111,976     118,288     334,646     348,351      108,730  
                                 

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated companies

     3,141     1,879     10,252     7,704      3,725  

Interest and other debt costs

     (1,535 )   (2,464 )   (5,713 )   (7,389 )    (1,336 )

Corporate general and administrative

     (9,417 )   (6,560 )   (30,418 )   (19,103 )    (9,904 )

Other income

     3,521     4,246     12,426     11,006      4,216  
                                 

Earnings before income taxes

   $ 107,686     115,389     321,193     340,569      105,431  
                                 

 

(A) The timing of dispositions of vessels is very difficult to predict, therefore, gains on sales of assets may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

United States-based Operations

U.S.-based operating profit for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 decreased approximately $20.3 million and $52.4 million, or 89% and 70%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007 primarily due to lower revenues. The reduction in current period operating profits was slightly mitigated by lower depreciation expense due to the transfer of vessels to international operating areas.

 

18


U.S.-based vessel revenues for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 decreased approximately 35% and 32%, or $19.9 million and $57.7 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007 due primarily to the transfer of vessels to international markets, to the sale of the company’s U.S.-based offshore tugs during the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2007 and to a reduction in utilization and average day rates. Removing the revenue effect of the company’s U.S.-based offshore tugs in the comparative data indicates that U.S.-based revenues for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 decreased approximately 35% and 27%, or $19.4 million and $45.1 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007.

The company’s active towing supply/supply vessels, the largest vessel class in the U.S. market, was responsible for approximately 88% and 70% of the loss of revenue for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007. The company’s deepwater class of vessels also incurred a loss of revenue during the same comparative periods of approximately 8% and 4%, respectively. Removing the revenue effect of the U.S.-based offshore tugs in the comparative data indicates that the company’s towing supply/supply class of vessels were responsible for approximately 91% and 90% of the loss in revenues for the quarter and nine-months ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007. The reduction of vessels in the towing supply/supply class from 42 during the quarter ended December 31, 2006, to 33 during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, accounted for a significant portion of the reduction in revenue from this class of vessel.

Average day rates on the U.S-based towing supply/supply vessels decreased approximately 18% and 5% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007, while utilization rates on this same class of vessel decreased approximately 23% and 13% during the same comparative periods, respectively. Average day rates on the company’s U.S.-based deepwater class of vessels decreased approximately 12% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 and decreased a modest 2% for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007, respectively. Utilization rates on the deepwater class of vessels decreased approximately 10% and 6% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007, primarily as a result of the increase in drydockings during the current quarter.

Utilization rates on the company’s domestic-based crew/utility class of vessels decreased approximately 7% and 5% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007, respectively. Average day rates for the crew/utility class of vessels decreased approximately 3% and 4% during the same comparative periods, respectively.

Current quarter U.S.-based vessel revenues decreased approximately $6.5 million, or 15%, as compared to the previous quarter due to lower utilization and average day rates. U.S.-based operating profit decreased approximately $7.3 million, or 75%, for the current quarter as compared to the previous quarter due primarily to lower revenues and an increase in repair and maintenance costs.

International-based Operations

International-based vessel operating profit increased approximately 25% and 29%, or $21.2 million and $67.0 million, for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007 primarily due to higher revenues. Higher international-based revenues earned during the current fiscal year periods were partially offset by increases in vessel operating costs (primarily crew costs due to basic inflationary increases in labor costs around the world, repair and maintenance costs, insurance and loss reserves, fuel, lube and supplies and other vessel costs) and higher depreciation expense resulting from an increase in the number of vessels operating internationally, including newly-constructed vessels added to the international-based fleet over the past year.

International-based vessel revenues increased approximately 22% and 24%, or $50.0 million and $148.1 million, for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007 primarily due to an increase in average day rates on all vessel

 

19


classes operating in international markets and to an increase in the number of vessels operating internationally.

The company’s international deepwater class, towing supply/supply class and crew/utility class of vessels generated approximately 23%, 74% and 3%, respectively, of the revenue growth during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 and generated approximately 25%, 68% and 8%, respectively, of the revenue growth for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007.

Average day rates for the company’s international deepwater class of vessels increased approximately 24% and 21% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007. Utilization rates on this same class of vessel decreased approximately 4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 and was unchanged during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. Utilization rates on the deepwater class of vessels decreased during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 primarily as a result of the increase in vessel drydockings during the current quarter.

Average day rates for the company’s international towing supply/supply class of vessels increased approximately 20% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007. Utilization rates on the international towing supply/supply class of vessels for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 were comparable to the rates achieved during the same periods in fiscal year 2007. Average day rates on the company’s international-based crew/utility class of vessels increased approximately 17% and 20% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007, respectively. Utilization rates for the crew/utility class of vessels decreased approximately 5% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 and was comparable during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period during fiscal 2007. Average day rates on the international offshore tugs increased approximately 20% and 13% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007, respectively, while utilization rates for the same class of vessel decreased approximately 14% and 11% during the same comparative periods, respectively.

While international-based vessel revenues improved during the nine months ended December 31, 2007, revenue growth was slowed by an increased number of maintenance days during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, resulting from a higher level of drydockings performed. While repair and maintenance expense was relatively stable when comparing the nine-month periods, capitalized repair and maintenance costs increased from $30.4 million during the nine months ended December 31, 2006 to $38.0 million during the during the nine months ended December 31, 2007. The increased number of maintenance days negatively impacted the utilization statistics of the company’s vessels during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007.

Current quarter international-based vessel revenues increased approximately 8%, or $19.8 million, as compared to the previous quarter due to an increase in average day rates. International-based vessel operating profit for the current quarter increased approximately 13%, or $12.4 million, as compared to the previous quarter primarily due to an increase in vessel revenue.

Other Items

The company performed a thorough review of all the vessels in its fleet for asset impairment during the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The review resulted in no impairment charge. The company’s thorough review of all the vessels in its fleet for asset impairment during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 also resulted in no impairment charge.

Gain on sales of assets during the nine months ended December 31, 2007 decreased approximately 76%, or $30.3 million, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 primarily due to the sale of 14 offshore tugs during second and third quarters of fiscal 2007. The sale of 11 of the tugs closed in August 2006 for a total cash price of $34.8 million. The sale of the other three tugs closed during the quarter ended

 

20


December 31, 2006, for a total sales price of $8.9 million. The culmination of the entire transaction resulted in an approximate $34.0 million pre-tax financial gain ($28.0 million was recorded in second quarter and $6.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007), or approximately $20.8 million after tax ($17.1 million in the second quarter and $3.7 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007), or $0.37 per diluted common share after tax ($0.30 in the second quarter and $0.07 during the third quarter of fiscal 2007). Dispositions of vessels can vary from quarter to quarter; therefore, gains on sales of assets may fluctuate significantly from period to period.

Insurance costs for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 increased approximately 148% and 51%, or $4.5 million and $6.1 million, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2007, respectively, due to lower premiums and loss reserves recorded in fiscal year 2007, resulting from a better safety record during fiscal 2007 compared to the company’s year-to-date safety performance in fiscal 2008.

Vessel Class Statistics

Vessel utilization is determined primarily by market conditions and to a lesser extent by drydocking requirements. Vessel day rates are determined by the demand created through the level of offshore exploration, development and production spending by energy companies relative to the supply of offshore service vessels. Suitability of equipment and the degree of service provided also influence vessel day rates. Vessel utilization rates are calculated by dividing the number of days a vessel works during a reporting period by the number of days the vessel is available to work in the reporting period. Average day rates are calculated by dividing the revenue a vessel earns during a reporting period by the number of days the vessel worked in the reporting period. Vessel utilization and average day rates are calculated only on vessels in service and, as such, do not include vessels withdrawn from service or joint venture vessels. The following tables compare day-based utilization percentages and average day rates by vessel class and in total for the quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the quarter ended September 30, 2007:

 

21


     Quarter Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
December 31,
   Quarter
Ended
Sept 30,
     2007     2006    2007    2006    2007

UTILIZATION:

             

United States-based fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

     90.5 %   100.0    92.3    97.8    95.1

Towing-supply/supply

     46.1     59.6    54.8    62.7    56.6

Crew/utility

     80.9     87.2    85.8    90.3    88.5

Offshore tugs

     —       100.0    —      42.8    —  

Total

     60.9 %   69.4    66.8    68.9    69.1

International-based fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

     91.4 %   95.4    93.2    93.2    91.8

Towing-supply/supply

     79.2     79.8    77.9    78.3    76.9

Crew/utility

     84.8     89.3    86.6    86.5    89.0

Offshore tugs

     54.7     63.3    59.3    66.8    59.8

Other

     54.8     44.8    52.6    47.6    48.3

Total

     78.5 %   80.6    78.6    79.3    78.3

Worldwide fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

     91.2 %   96.3    93.0    94.1    92.5

Towing-supply/supply

     74.8     76.1    74.6    75.3    74.1

Crew/utility

     84.2     89.0    86.5    87.1    88.9

Offshore tugs

     54.7     64.0    59.3    63.2    59.8

Other

     54.8     44.8    52.6    47.6    48.3

Total

     76.2 %   78.8    77.0    77.5    77.0
                           

AVERAGE VESSEL DAY RATES:

             

United States-based fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

   $ 23,256     26,551    23,342    23,850    23,382

Towing-supply/supply

     10,399     12,655    11,499    12,113    11,856

Crew/utility

     6,093     6,264    6,122    6,398    6,270

Offshore tugs

     —       6,511    —      15,675    —  

Total

   $ 11,759     13,130    12,013    12,541    12,254

International-based fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

   $ 24,980     20,206    23,516    19,366    22,423

Towing-supply/supply

     10,455     8,682    10,014    8,363    10,080

Crew/utility

     4,661     3,982    4,636    3,878    4,584

Offshore tugs

     7,092     5,934    6,875    6,073    6,511

Other

     5,672     4,134    5,282    3,734    4,419

Total

   $ 10,369     8,453    9,900    8,174    9,768

Worldwide fleet:

             

Deepwater vessels

   $ 24,612     21,487    23,483    20,271    22,615

Towing-supply/supply

     10,451     9,249    10,166    8,958    10,267

Crew/utility

     4,884     4,313    4,864    4,288    4,852

Offshore tugs

     7,092     5,952    6,875    7,047    6,511

Other

     5,672     4,134    5,282    3,734    4,419

Total

   $ 10,515     9,107    10,143    8,862    10,064
                           

 

22


The following table compares the average number of vessels by class and geographic distribution for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
December 31,
   Quarter
Ended
Sept 30,
     2007    2006    2007    2006    2007

United States-based fleet:

              

Deepwater vessels

   8    7    7    7    7

Towing-supply/supply

   34    47    36    49    35

Crew/utility

   14    13    13    13    13

Offshore tugs

   —      1    —      7    —  
                        

Total

   56    68    56    76    55
                        

International-based fleet:

              

Deepwater vessels

   30    29    30    29    30

Towing-supply/supply

   225    211    221    207    221

Crew/utility

   69    72    71    71    68

Offshore tugs

   37    39    37    39    38

Other

   5    6    5    7    5
                        

Total

   366    357    364    353    362
                        

Owned or chartered vessels included in marine revenues

   422    425    420    429    417

Vessels withdrawn from service

   22    43    24    51    24

Joint-venture and other

   14    18    14    20    14
                        

Total

   458    486    458    500    455
                        

Included in total owned or chartered vessels are vessels that were stacked by the company. The company considers a vessel to be stacked if its crew is removed from the vessel and limited maintenance is being performed on the vessel. This action is taken to reduce operating costs when management does not foresee adequate marketing possibilities for the specific vessels in the near future. Vessels are added to this list when market conditions warrant and they are removed from this list when sold or otherwise disposed of or when returned to active service. When advantageous new marketing opportunities arise, the stacked vessels can be returned to active service by performing any necessary maintenance on the vessel and returning fleet personnel to operate the vessel. Although not currently at work fulfilling charters, stacked vessels are considered to be in service and are included in the calculation of the company’s utilization statistics. The company had 51, 46 and 51 stacked vessels at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and at September 30, 2007, respectively.

Vessels withdrawn from service represent those vessels that management has determined are unlikely to return to active service and are currently marketed for sale. Vessels withdrawn from service are not included in the company’s utilization statistics.

The following is a summary of net properties and equipment at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007:

 

     December 31, 2007    March 31, 2007
     Number
Of Vessels
   Carrying Value    Number
Of Vessels
   Carrying Value
          (In thousands)         (In thousands)

Vessels in active service

   368    $ 1,332,451    370    1,265,844

Stacked vessels

   51      14,536    48    13,869

Vessels withdrawn from service

   22      3,028    29    2,867

Marine equipment under construction

        272,597       182,964

Other property and equipment

        44,387       16,553
                     

Totals

   441    $ 1,666,999    447    1,482,097
                     

 

23


During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, the company took delivery of five anchor handling towing supply vessels, three platform supply vessel, four crewboats and three offshore tugs and sold to third party operators five anchor handling towing supply vessels, six platform supply vessels, six utility vessels and four offshore tugs.

During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, the company took delivery of four anchor handling towing supply vessels, one platform supply vessel and six crewboats and sold to third party operators or to scrap dealers 16 anchor handling towing supply vessels, 21 platform supply vessels, two crewboats, 16 offshore tugs and three other type vessels.

General and Administrative Expenses

Consolidated general and administrative expenses for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
December 31,
   Quarter
Ended
Sept 30,

(In thousands)

   2007    2006    2007    2006    2007

Personnel

   $ 16,701    15,252    51,840    44,565    16,885

Office and property

     4,263    3,510    12,183    10,453    3,928

Sales and marketing

     2,080    1,931    5,541    5,090    1,752

Professional services

     6,068    2,395    16,921    6,803    5,245

Other

     2,000    1,836    6,819    5,680    2,870
                          
   $ 31,112    24,924    93,304    72,591    30,680
                          

General and administrative expenses for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 were approximately 25% and 29% higher as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007 due to the amortization of restricted stock granted in March 2007; higher professional services due to legal fees related to the internal investigation on the company’s Nigerian and selected other country operations (as discussed elsewhere in this report) and to the court-approved settlement of a California labor law claim; and an improved business environment. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were comparable to the prior quarter of fiscal 2008.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Matters

Cash from operations, in combination with the company’s senior unsecured debt and available line of credit, provide the company, in management’s opinion, with adequate resources to satisfy its current liquidity requirements. At December 31, 2007, the entire amount of the company’s $300 million revolving line of credit (which includes a mechanism for increasing the amount of the facility to $400 million) was available for future financing needs. Continued payment of dividends, currently at $0.15 per quarter per common share, is subject to declaration by the Board of Directors.

In July 2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $200.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, to fund the share repurchases. The repurchase program will end on the earlier of the date that all authorized funds have been expended or June 30, 2008, unless extended by the Board of Directors. On January 31, 2008, the company’s Board of Directors approved the expansion of the company’s current share repurchase program by an additional $50 million. For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the company expended $116.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,282,200 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $51.00. At December 31, 2007, approximately $22.5 million ($72.5 million after the January 31, 2008 expansion of the program) was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the July 2007 authorized stock repurchase program. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, the company used $291.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 4,925,600 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $59.11.

 

24


In July 2006, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $157.9 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2007. From inception of the July 2006 authorized repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2007, the company used $154.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,560,500 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $60.17. The company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, the company used $40.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 867,100 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $46.57.

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2006. From inception of the repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2006, the company expended $112.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,396,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $46.79. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, the company expended $91.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 1,941,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $47.06.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities for any period will fluctuate according to the level of business activity for the applicable period. For the nine months ended December 31, 2007, net cash from operating activities was $353.1 million compared to $332.9 million for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006. Significant components of cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, include net earnings of $263.4 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $81.0 million and changes in working capital balances of $8.7 million.

Significant components of cash provided by operating activities for the nine-months ended December 31, 2006 include net earnings of $269.0 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $51.8 million and changes in working capital of $12.0 million.

Investing Activities

Investing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, used $230.5 million of cash, which is attributed to $291.7 million of additions to properties and equipment, offset by approximately $61.2 million in proceeds from the sales of assets. Additions to properties and equipment were comprised of approximately $38.0 million in capitalized major repair costs, $5.0 million for vessel enhancements, $235.9 million for the construction of offshore marine vessels, $10.9 million for the construction of an aircraft and $1.9 million of other properties and equipment purchases.

Investing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 used $95.5 million, which is attributed to the $173.4 million additions to properties and equipment offset by approximately $67.7 million of proceeds from the sales of assets and the collection of $9.5 million relating to the payoff of an outstanding financing arrangement the company had with Sonatide Marine Ltd., a 49% owned joint-venture. Additions to properties and equipment were comprised of approximately $30.4 million in capitalized major repair costs, $115.6 million for the construction of offshore marine vessels, $12.1 million for vessel enhancements, $13.4 million for the construction of an aircraft and $1.9 million of other properties and equipment purchases.

Financing Activities

Financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, used $287.8 million of cash, which is primarily the result of $291.1 million used to repurchase the company’s common stock, $25.0 million used for quarterly payment of common stock dividends of $0.15 per common share, and $19.6 million of principal payments on capitalized lease obligations. These uses of cash were partially offset by $43.6 million of

 

25


proceeds from the issuance of common stock resulting from stock option exercisements and $4.3 million tax benefit on stock options exercised.

Financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 used $142.7 million of cash, which is primarily the result of $131.7 million used to repurchase common stock, $25.5 million used for quarterly payment of common stock dividends of $0.15 per common share, and $5.0 million used to repay debt. These uses of cash were partially offset by $5.0 million provided by debt borrowings, $11.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock resulting from stock option exercisements and $3.1 million tax benefit on stock options exercised.

Vessel Construction and Acquisition Expenditures

The company is currently constructing 20 anchor handling towing supply vessels, varying in size from 5,000 brake horsepower (BHP) to 13,600 BHP, for a total commitment cost of approximately $387.8 million. Five different international shipyards are constructing the vessels. Six of the anchor handling towing supply vessels are large deepwater class vessels. Scheduled deliveries for the 20 vessels began in January 2008 with the last vessel scheduled for delivery in June 2010. As of December 31, 2007, $157.6 million has been expended on the vessels.

The company is also committed to the construction of one 220-foot, six 230-foot, eight 240-foot and three 250-foot platform supply vessels for a total aggregate cost of approximately $346.9 million. The company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyard, LLC, is constructing the 220-foot and two of the 250-foot vessels, while a different U.S. shipyard is constructing the third 250-foot vessel. One international shipyard is constructing the six 230-foot vessels while two different international shipyards are constructing the eight 240-foot vessels. The 220-foot vessel is expected to be delivered in February 2008. The six 230-foot vessels are scheduled for delivery beginning in December 2008 with final delivery of the sixth vessel in January 2010. Expected delivery for the eight 240-foot vessels, which are considered deepwater class vessels, will begin in January 2009 with delivery of the eighth 240-foot vessel in September 2009. One of the 250-foot vessels (which are considered deepwater class vessels) was delivered in early January 2008. The remaining two 250-foot vessels are expected to be delivered in December 2009 and March 2010. As of December 31, 2007, $74.7 million has been expended on these 18 vessels.

The company is also committed to the construction of two 175-foot, fast, crew/supply boats for an aggregate cost of approximately $17.4 million. The crewboats are being constructed at an international shipyard. The vessels are expected to be delivered to the company in June and September of 2009. As of December 31, 2007, $5.3 million has been expended on these two vessels.

The company is also committed to the construction of three offshore tug vessels for an aggregated cost of approximately $40.6 million. The offshore tugs are being constructed at two separate international shipyards and are expected to be delivered to the company in May 2008, July 2009 and August 2009. As of December 31, 2007, $11.8 million has been expended on these three vessels.

The table below summarizes the various vessel commitments as discussed above by vessel class and type as of December 31, 2007:

 

     U. S. Built    International Built

Vessel class and type

   Number
of
Vessels
   Total
Cost
Commitment
   Expended
Through
12/31/07
   Number
of
Vessels
   Total
Cost
Commitment
   Expended
Through
12/31/07
          (In thousands)         (In thousands)

Deepwater vessels:

                 

Anchor handling towing supply

   —        —        —      6    $ 170,710    $ 72,132

Platform supply vessels

   3    $ 82,540    $ 16,799    8    $ 174,293    $ 27,865

Replacement Fleet:

                 

Anchor handling towing supply

   —        —        —      14    $ 217,054    $ 85,439

Platform supply vessels

   1    $ 15,623    $ 12,107    6    $ 74,485    $ 17,881

Crewboats and offshore tugs:

                 

Crewboats – 175-foot

   —        —        —      2    $ 17,395    $ 5,331

Offshore tugs

   —        —        —      3    $ 40,597    $ 11,849
                                     

Totals

   4    $ 98,163    $ 28,906    39    $ 694,534    $ 220,497
                                     

 

26


The table below summarizes by vessel class and vessel type the number of vessels expected to be delivered by quarter of the various vessel commitments as discussed above:

 

     Quarter Period Ended

Vessel class and type

   3/08    6/08    9/08    12/08    3/09    Thereafter

Deepwater vessels:

                 

Anchor handling towing supply

   —      —      —      —      —      6

Platform supply vessels

   1    —      —      —      3    7

Replacement Fleet:

                 

Anchor handling towing supply

   2    3    5    2    1    1

Platform supply vessels

   1    —      —      1    1    4

Crewboats and offshore tugs:

                 

Crewboats – 175-foot

   —      —      —      —      —      2

Offshore tugs

   —      1    —      —      —      2
                             

Totals

   4    4    5    3    5    22
                             

The company has recently experienced some delays in the expected deliveries of equipment for vessels under construction (as has the offshore supply vessel industry in general). The delays experienced by the company to date are reflected in the revised table set forth above. Further delays could continue to negatively impact the deliveries scheduled above, and the table above is therefore subject to continued modification as and when such information becomes available.

To date, the company has financed its vessel commitment programs from its current cash balances, its operating cash flow, its $300 million senior unsecured notes, its revolving credit facility and various capitalized and operating lease arrangements. Of the total $792.7 million of capital commitments for vessels currently under construction the company has expended $249.4 million as of December 31, 2007.

Subsequent to December 31, 2007, the company committed to the construction of eight additional deepwater platform supply vessels for a total aggregate cost of approximately $202.0 million. The vessels, which are being built at an international shipyard, are expected to be delivered to the market beginning in September 2010 with final delivery of the last vessel in June 2012.

Interest and Debt Costs

The company is capitalizing a portion of its interest costs incurred on borrowed funds used to construct vessels. Interest and debt costs incurred, net of interest capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, was approximately $1.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively. Interest costs capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $2.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively.

Total interest and debt costs incurred during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 were lower than the same periods in fiscal year 2007 because the relative-portion of interest cost capitalized during the quarter and nine month period ended December 31, 2007 was higher than the same periods in fiscal year 2007 due to an increase in the level of investments in the company’s new construction program during the comparative periods.

Interest and debt costs incurred, net of interest capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, was approximately $2.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively. Interest costs capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $1.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

Other Liquidity Matters

While the company has an aggressive program of new-build commitments to replace its aging fleet of vessels over time, the company’s strong balance sheet and available liquidity allows it to be opportunistic in the enhancement of that program, which the company anticipates taking advantage of over the next several years. The majority of the company’s core group of older vessels, its supply and towing supply vessels,

 

27


were constructed between 1976 and 1983. As such, most of this vessel class exceeds 24 years of age and may be replaced within the next several years depending on the strength of the market during this time frame. In addition to age, market conditions also help determine when a vessel is no longer economically viable. The company anticipates using future operating cash flows, existing borrowing capacities or new borrowings or lease arrangements to fund over the next few years the continuing replacement of the company’s mature fleet of vessels. These vessels would replace the company’s aging vessels in the core international fleet with fewer, larger and more efficient vessels. The company stays in regular contact with its historical sources of capital and liquidity and monitors most other capital markets on an on-going basis. In spite of the current turmoil in capital markets caused by the evolving Sub-Prime lending situation the company believes that adequate capital and liquidity at, or near, historical pricing will be available to fund the continuation of its fleet replacement program.

Certain current and former subsidiaries of the company are, or have been, participating employers in an industry-wide multi-employer retirement fund in the United Kingdom, the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (MNOPF.) The company has been informed of a fund deficit that will require contributions from the participating employers. Substantially all of the fund’s deficit allocable to the company relates to current operating subsidiaries as the company does not believe, on the advice of counsel, that it is liable for any additional portion of the fund’s deficit that relates to subsidiaries that have either been sold or dissolved in prior years. The amount of the company’s share of the fund’s deficit will depend ultimately on a number of factors including an updated calculation of the total fund deficit, the number of participating employers, and the final method used in allocating the required contribution among participating employers. In August 2005, the company received an invoice from the fund in the amount of $3.8 million for what the trustees calculated to be the company’s then current share of the fund deficit. Accordingly, the company recorded this amount in full as crew cost expense during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. As allowed by the terms of the assessment, approximately $0.5 million and $0.7 million of the invoiced amount was paid during fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively with the remainder, including interest charges, to be paid in annual installments over the next eight years. The annual installment payments are paid in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and, as such, no amounts were paid during the nine month period ended December 31, 2007.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the company provided an additional $3.5 million of crew costs expense due to the finalization of the pension fund’s 2006 actuarial evaluation. The first installment on the additional $3.5 million of $0.5 million was paid in October 2007 with the remaining $3.0 million due over the next seven years.

In the future the fund’s trustee may claim that the company owes additional amounts for various reasons, including the results of future fund valuation reports and whether other assessed parties have the financial capability to contribute their respective allocations.

The company has been made a defendant in several lawsuits in various areas of the world where its marine vessel operations are conducted, including a class action styled suit in California, alleging certain labor and wage and hour law violations claimed by certain current and former employees. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the company provided $3.0 million for a court-approved settlement of the California wage issue, which is inclusive of interest and attorney fees. As of December 31, 2007, $2.5 million remains accrued and unpaid. Plaintiffs to the class action suit had until January 14, 2008, to submit a notice of claim and according to the company’s legal counsel, the majority of plaintiffs have responded to the settlement and the matter is expected to close in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. No additional accruals are needed for this matter.

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose or may arise in the future in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Internal Investigation

A full discussion on the company’s internal investigation on its Nigerian operations is contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

 

28


Goodwill

The company tests goodwill impairment annually at the reporting unit level using carrying amounts as of December 31. The company considers its reporting units to be its U.S. and international operations.

The company performed its annual impairment test as of December 31, 2007, and the test determined there was no goodwill impairment. Interim testing will be performed when events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. A full discussion on the methodology the company uses to test goodwill impairment and examples of the types of events that may occur which would require interim testing is included in Item 7 and in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 25, 2007. Goodwill as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 is $328.8 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In March 2006, the company entered into an agreement to sell five of its vessels that were under construction at the time, to Banc of America Leasing & Capital LLC (BOAL&C), an unrelated third party, for $75.5 million and simultaneously enter into bareboat charter arrangements with BOAL&C upon the vessels’ delivery to the market.

In late March 2006, the company sold one of its newly-built vessels under the sale/leaseback agreement for $12.0 million and simultaneously entered into a bareboat charter arrangement with BOAL&C. The company sold a second vessel under this agreement during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 for $12.0 million and simultaneously entered into a bareboat charter arrangement. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the company sold a third vessel under this agreement for $17.0 million and simultaneously entered into a bareboat charter arrangement. The company sold its fourth vessel under this agreement for $17.5 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and simultaneously entered into a bareboat charter arrangement. The company is accounting for the four transactions as sale/leaseback transactions with operating lease treatment. Accordingly, the company did not record the asset on its books and the company is expensing periodic lease payments.

For the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, the company expensed approximately $1.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively on these bareboat charter arrangements as compared to $0.5 million and $1.1 million for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006, respectively. The charter hire operating lease terms on the first two vessels sold to BOAL&C expire in calendar year 2014. The company has the option to extend the respective charter hire operating leases three times, each for a period of 12 months, which would provide the company the opportunity to extend the operating leases through calendar year 2017. The charter hire operating lease terms on the third and fourth vessels sold to BOAL&C expire in 2015 and the company has the option to extend the charter hire operating leases three times, each for a period of 12 months, which would provide the company the opportunity to extend the operating leases through calendar year 2018.

The company has one additional vessel to sell and simultaneously bareboat charter from BOAL&C under the agreement. The vessel was delivered to the market in early January 2008. BOAL&C agreed to pay actual invoice cost of the vessel being acquired, or $17.5 million.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 25, 2007, describes the accounting policies that are critical to reporting the company’s financial position and operating results and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the discussion contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, regarding these critical accounting policies.

 

29


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group are compared with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. The company estimates cash flows based upon historical data adjusted for the company’s best estimate of future market performance that is based on industry trends. If impairment exists, the carrying value of the asset group is reduced to its estimated fair value. Vessels with similar operating and marketing characteristics are grouped for asset impairment testing.

Although the company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result. Management estimates may vary considerably from actual outcomes due to future adverse market conditions or poor operating results that could result in the inability to recover the current carrying value of an asset group, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. As the company’s fleet continues to age, management closely monitors the estimates and assumptions used in the impairment analysis to properly identify evolving trends and changes in market conditions that could impact the results of the impairment evaluation.

In addition to the periodic review of long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances warrant, the company also performs a review of its stacked vessels and vessels withdrawn from service every six months. This review considers items such as the vessel’s age, length of time stacked and likelihood of a return to active service, among others. The company records an impairment charge when the carrying value of a vessel withdrawn from service or stacked vessel that is unlikely to return to service exceeds its estimated fair value.

The company performed a thorough review of all the vessels in its fleet for asset impairment during the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The review resulted in no impairment charge. The company’s quarter ended December 31, 2006 thorough review of all the vessels in its fleet for asset impairment also resulted in no impairment charges.

Effects of Inflation

Day-to-day operating costs are generally affected by inflation. However, because the energy services industry requires specialized goods and services, general economic inflationary trends may not affect the company’s operating costs. The major impact on operating costs is the level of offshore exploration, development and production spending by energy exploration and production companies. As the spending increases, prices of goods and services used by the energy industry and the energy services industry will increase. Future increases in vessel day rates may shield the company from the inflationary effects on operating costs.

Due to the increase in business activity resulting from strong global oil and gas fundamentals, the competitive market for experienced crew personnel has exerted upward pressure on wages in the labor markets which increased the company’s operating expenses.

In addition, strong fundamentals have also increased the activity levels at shipyards worldwide, which has led to increased pricing for both repair work and new construction work at shipyards.

Also, the commodity price of steel has increased dramatically due to increased worldwide demand for the metal. The price of steel is high by historical standards and although prices moderated some since calendar year 2005, availability of iron ore, the main component of steel, is tighter today than in 2005 when prices for iron ore increased dramatically. If the price of steel continues to rise, the cost of new vessels will result in higher capital expenditures and depreciation expenses which will reduce the company’s future operating profits, unless day rates increase commensurately.

 

30


Environmental Matters

During the ordinary course of business the company’s operations are subject to a wide variety of environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with existing governmental regulations that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had, nor is expected to have, a material effect on the company. The company is proactive in establishing policies and operating procedures for safeguarding the environment against any environmentally hazardous material aboard its vessels and at shore base locations. Whenever possible, hazardous materials are maintained or transferred in confined areas to ensure containment if accidents occur. In addition, the company has established operating policies that are intended to increase awareness of actions that may harm the environment.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk refers to the potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices including the correlation among these factors and their volatility. The company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency fluctuations and exchange risk.

Interest Rate Risk. Changes in interest rates may result in changes in the fair market value of the company’s financial instruments, interest income and interest expense. The company’s financial instruments that are exposed to interest rate risk are its cash equivalents and long-term borrowings. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of the cash equivalent investment portfolio, the company does not expect any material loss with respect to its investments. The book value for cash equivalents is considered to be representative of its fair value.

At December 31, 2007, the company had $300 million of debt outstanding which represents senior unsecured notes that were issued on July 8, 2003. The multiple series of notes with maturities ranging from 7 years to 12 years have an average outstanding life to maturity of 9.5 years and can be retired prior to maturity without penalty. The weighted average interest rate on the notes is 4.35%. The fair value of this debt at December 31, 2007 is estimated to be $293.5 million.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the company was exposed to possible interest rate fluctuations related to its commitment to the sale/leaseback of one of its vessels to BOAL&C. On March 24, 2006, the company entered into one interest rate swap transaction to effectively fix the amount of the lease payments on the vessel under construction that the company agreed to sell and leaseback from BOAL&C. The lease payments for the vessel is based on the five year swap rate at the time of the lease which coincides with the delivery of the vessel. Amounts received from the bank or paid to the bank will be recorded on the company’s balance sheet as either an other asset or other liability and amortized over the term of the lease. The company is accounting for the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, as amended. The derivative instrument was carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets or other liabilities depending on the fair value at the balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent the hedge is effective, are recognized in other comprehensive income (a component of stockholders’ equity). Amounts representing hedge ineffectiveness, if any, are recorded in earnings. At December 31, 2007, the outstanding interest rate swap matured and, as such, no fair value amounts are included in the consolidated balance sheet.

Foreign Exchange Risk. The company’s financial instruments that can be affected by foreign currency fluctuations and exchange risks consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The company periodically enters into spot and forward derivative financial instruments as a hedge against foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities and currency commitments.

Spot derivative financial instruments are short-term in nature and settle within two business days. The fair value approximates the carrying value due to the short-term nature of this instrument, and as a result, no gains or losses are recognized. Forward derivative financial instruments are generally longer-term in nature but generally do not exceed one year. The accounting for gains or losses on forward contracts is dependent

 

31


on the nature of the risk being hedged and the effectiveness of the hedge. The company enters into derivative instruments only to the extent considered necessary to meet its risk management objectives and does not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

The company had no outstanding currency spot or forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2007.

Because of its significant international operations, the company is exposed to currency fluctuations and exchange risk on all charter hire contracts denominated in foreign currencies. The company does not hedge against any foreign currency rate fluctuations associated with foreign currency contracts that arise in the normal course of business. To minimize the financial impact of these items the company attempts to contract a significant majority of its services in United States dollars. The company continually monitors the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in U.S. dollars.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CEO and CFO Certificates

Included as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are “Certifications” of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The first form of certification is required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Quarterly Report contains the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that all information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act’), such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its chief executive and chief financial officers, or person performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, any control system, no matter how well conceived and followed, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

The company evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s management, including the company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer along with the company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that although the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were generally effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the reports the company files and submits under the Exchange Act, they were not effective to the extent disclosed below.

The conclusion that the company’s disclosure controls were not wholly effective relates to the disclosures made by the company in its Form 10-Q filed with respect to its first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007. In that disclosure, the company advised that special counsel conducting the company’s previously disclosed, ongoing internal investigation into certain FCPA matters had advised, and the company had agreed, that certain payments apparently made to Nigerian customs officials by the agent on behalf of the company’s Nigerian affiliate might not be lawful facilitating payments under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), and that, even if lawful, were not properly recorded as facilitating payments in the company’s books and records in the manner required by the FCPA. In addition, the company disclosed that special counsel had advised the Audit Committee and management that the company’s FCPA compliance program that was previously in effect was not sufficient to give appropriate assurance that the requirements of the statute were satisfied, and that inadequate training of company personnel with respect to the statute’s

 

32


requirements led to misjudgments by such personnel when FCPA compliance issues were presented. Based on these considerations, and the other considerations disclosed in the first quarter Form 10-Q, the company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer had concluded and reported to the company’s independent auditors and its Audit Committee that the company had a material weakness in internal controls with respect to these FCPA compliance matters.

The company further reported in the first quarter Form 10-Q that it had embarked on the implementation of changes in its disclosure and internal controls in order to give sufficient assurance of future compliance with the requirements of the FCPA, and to assure that potential FCPA issues are appropriately identified, reported, and evaluated in the future. These changes were disclosed in the first quarter Form 10-Q, and continue to be implemented. However, the company’s management believes that, while substantial progress has been made to improve the company’s comprehensive FCPA compliance program, it is premature to determine whether the measures adopted have been fully effective in correcting the material weakness identified, and that additional time must elapse with the new, enhanced procedures in place before such a judgment can be made prudently. The auditors concur with management’s decision to defer reaching any conclusion as to the effectiveness of the company’s FCPA controls. The company continues to give priority attention to these issues and will reevaluate the effectiveness of these controls no later than the filing of the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than those changes discussed above, there are no changes that could materially affect or are reasonably likely to materially affect the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

33


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The company is not a party to any litigation that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 25, 2007.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Common Stock Repurchase Program

In July 2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $200.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, to fund the share repurchases. The repurchase program will end on the earlier of the date that all authorized funds have been expended or June 30, 2008, unless extended by the Board of Directors. On January 31, 2008, the company’s Board of Directors approved the expansion of the company’s current share repurchase program by an additional $50 million. For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the company expended $116.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,282,200 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $51.00. At December 31, 2007, approximately $22.5 million ($72.5 million after the January 31, 2008 expansion of the program) was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the July 2007 authorized stock repurchase program.

In July 2006, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $157.9 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open-market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2007. From inception of the July 2006 authorized repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2007, the company used $154.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,560,500 common shares, at an average price paid per common share of $60.17. The company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to use up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock in open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program expired on June 30, 2006. From inception of the repurchase program through its conclusion on June 30, 2006, the company expended $112.1 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 2,396,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $46.79. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, the company expended $91.4 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 1,941,100 common shares, or an average price paid per common share of $47.06.

 

34


The following table summarizes the stock repurchase activity for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to the stock repurchase program:

 

     Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
Per Share
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Program
   Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program

October 1, 2007 - October 31, 2007

   152,000    $ 55.11    152,000    $ 130,565,932

November 1, 2007 - November 30, 2007

   1,407,900      50.23    1,407,900      59,840,622

December 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007

   722,300      51.65    722,300      22,536,985
                   

Total

   2,282,200    $ 51.00    2,282,200   
                   

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

 

35


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

    TIDEWATER INC.
    (Registrant)
Date: February 7, 2008     /s/ Dean E. Taylor
    Dean E. Taylor
    Chairman of the Board, President and
    Chief Executive Officer

 

   
Date: February 7, 2008     /s/ J. Keith Lousteau
    J. Keith Lousteau
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

   
Date: February 7, 2008     /s/ Joseph M. Bennett
    Joseph M. Bennett
    Senior Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer
    and Chief Investor Relations Officer

 

36


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

   
15*   Letter re Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
31.1*   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

Filed herewith

+

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

37