e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-8038
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2648081
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(713) 651-4300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 31, 2009, the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant was
124,046,273.
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
2
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to statements of historical fact, this report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not
historical in nature or that relate to future events and conditions are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, estimates and projections about Key Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, our
industry and managements beliefs and assumptions concerning future events and financial trends
affecting our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, you can identify these
statements by terminology such as may, will, predicts, projects, potential or continue
or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements are only
predictions and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. In evaluating those statements,
you should carefully consider the information above as well as the risks outlined in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, in our recent Current Reports on
Form 8-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual performance
or results may differ materially and adversely.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this report except as required by law. All of our written and oral
forward-looking statements are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any other
cautionary statements that may accompany such forward-looking statements.
3
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
79,639 |
|
|
$ |
92,691 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,132 and
$11,468, respectively |
|
|
197,181 |
|
|
|
377,353 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
31,619 |
|
|
|
34,756 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
15,513 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
25,581 |
|
|
|
26,623 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
21,218 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,676 |
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
372,241 |
|
|
|
559,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, gross |
|
|
1,907,114 |
|
|
|
1,858,307 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(871,144 |
) |
|
|
(806,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,035,970 |
|
|
|
1,051,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
321,338 |
|
|
|
320,992 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
35,928 |
|
|
|
42,345 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,509 |
|
|
|
10,489 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable related parties |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Equity method investments |
|
|
23,323 |
|
|
|
24,220 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,805,912 |
|
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
21,942 |
|
|
$ |
46,185 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
140,460 |
|
|
|
197,116 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
4,368 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
Current portion of notes payable related parties, net of discount |
|
|
14,383 |
|
|
|
14,318 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
191,087 |
|
|
|
273,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less current portion |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
512,812 |
|
|
|
613,828 |
|
Workers compensation, vehicular, health and other insurance liabilities |
|
|
36,952 |
|
|
|
43,151 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
188,203 |
|
|
|
188,581 |
|
Other non-current accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,336 |
|
|
|
17,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 124,046,273 and 121,305,289 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
12,131 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
605,956 |
|
|
|
601,872 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(51,010 |
) |
|
|
(46,550 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
275,710 |
|
|
|
293,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
843,061 |
|
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,805,912 |
|
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
241,458 |
|
|
$ |
502,003 |
|
|
$ |
573,447 |
|
|
$ |
958,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
173,853 |
|
|
|
322,488 |
|
|
|
401,080 |
|
|
|
604,129 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
43,191 |
|
|
|
42,271 |
|
|
|
87,947 |
|
|
|
82,247 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
45,395 |
|
|
|
58,249 |
|
|
|
94,101 |
|
|
|
125,981 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
10,181 |
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
|
|
19,829 |
|
|
|
20,119 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
270,589 |
|
|
|
430,756 |
|
|
|
601,449 |
|
|
|
830,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(29,131 |
) |
|
|
71,247 |
|
|
|
(28,002 |
) |
|
|
128,154 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
(27,446 |
) |
|
|
10,433 |
|
|
|
(49,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(18,473 |
) |
|
|
43,801 |
|
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
$ |
44,012 |
|
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
124,448 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
126,207 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
126,521 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
127,914 |
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
$ |
43,801 |
|
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax of
$(515), $0, $(44) and $0, respectively |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
(4,490 |
) |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain from available for sale investments, net of
tax of $0, $0, $0 and $0, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(17,709 |
) |
|
|
46,584 |
|
|
|
(22,029 |
) |
|
|
80,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(17,709 |
) |
|
$ |
46,771 |
|
|
$ |
(22,029 |
) |
|
$ |
80,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
87,947 |
|
|
|
82,247 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Loss (income) from equity method investments |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs and discount |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(2,444 |
) |
|
|
(3,174 |
) |
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
Loss on sale of available for sale investments, net |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
7,217 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
177,321 |
|
|
|
(44,369 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses |
|
|
(105,098 |
) |
|
|
42,258 |
|
Share-based compensation liability awards |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
384 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
157,299 |
|
|
|
162,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(67,409 |
) |
|
|
(71,371 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
3,818 |
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $0 and $2,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,619 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
Dividend from equity-method investments |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(63,392 |
) |
|
|
(131,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(6,107 |
) |
|
|
(5,936 |
) |
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(95,879 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
5,972 |
|
Proceeds paid for deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(106,069 |
) |
|
|
(44,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,052 |
) |
|
|
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
92,691 |
|
|
|
58,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
79,639 |
|
|
$ |
45,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Key Energy Services, Inc., and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. GENERAL
Key Energy Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its controlled subsidiaries
(collectively, Key, the Company, we, us, its, and our) provide a complete range of
services to major oil companies, foreign national oil companies and independent oil and natural gas
production companies, including rig-based services, fluid management services, pressure pumping
services, fishing services, rental services, and cased-hole electric wireline services. We operate
in most major oil and natural gas producing regions of the United States as well as internationally
in Argentina and Mexico. We also own a technology development company based in Canada and have
equity interests in oilfield service companies in Canada and the Russian Federation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The condensed December 31, 2008 balance sheet was prepared from
audited financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Certain information relating to the Companys organization and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been
condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report include all
normal and recurring material adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a
fair presentation of the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
interim periods presented herein. The results of operations for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year or any
other interim period, due to fluctuations in demand for our services, timing of maintenance and
other expenditures, and other factors.
We have evaluated events occurring after the balance sheet date included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for possible disclosure as a subsequent event. Management monitored for
subsequent events through August 6, 2009 as this was the date that these financial statements were
available to be issued. No subsequent events that required disclosure were identified.
NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to develop
estimates and to make assumptions that affect our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. These estimates also impact the nature and extent of our disclosure, if any, of our
commitments and contingencies. Among other things, we use estimates to (i) analyze assets for
possible impairment, (ii) determine depreciable lives for our assets, (iii) assess future tax
exposure and realization of deferred tax assets, (iv) determine amounts to accrue for
contingencies, (v) value tangible and intangible assets and (vi) assess workers compensation,
vehicular liability, self-insured risk accruals and other insurance reserves. Our actual results
may differ materially from these estimates. We believe that our estimates are reasonable. There
have been no material changes in our evaluation of the accounting estimates or underlying
assumptions to the significant accounting policies and estimates as disclosed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
New Accounting Standards Adopted in this Report
FSP 157-4. In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)157-4, Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4
clarified the application of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) by providing
additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157, when the volume and
level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes
guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and the adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
8
FSP 115-2. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 115-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (FSP 115-2), which amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP
for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. FSP 115-2 does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and the adoption of this standard did not have
a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FSP 107-1. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1), which amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies, as well as in annual
financial statements. FSP 107-1 also amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information for
interim reporting periods. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June
15, 2009, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS 165. In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS
165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosing of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
SFAS 165 does not significantly change the types of subsequent events that an entity reports, but
it requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and
the basis for that date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual reporting requirements ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted in this Report
SFAS 166. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 amends the application and
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishment of Liabilities a Replacement of FASB Statement 125 (SFAS 140) and removes
the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from
applying FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an
Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46(R)) to qualifying special purpose entities. SFAS 166 is
effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, and early
adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS 167. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R) (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends the scope of FIN 46(R) to include entities previously
considered qualifying special-purpose entities by FIN 46(R), as the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity was eliminated in SFAS 166. This standard is to be effective for the first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, and early adoption is not permitted.
The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS 168. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (SFAS 168). Upon its adoption, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) will become the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied
to nongovernmental entities. On the effective date of SFAS 168, the Codification will supersede
all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. Following SFAS 168, the FASB will
not issue new accounting standards in the form of FASB Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or
Emerging Issues Task Force abstracts. SFAS 168 will also modify the existing hierarchy of GAAP to
include only two levels authoritative and non-authoritative. SFAS 168 will be effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and
early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard
will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS
From time to time, the Company acquires businesses or assets that are consistent with its
long-term growth strategy. Results of operations for acquisitions are included in the Companys
financial statements beginning on the date of acquisition. Acquisitions prior to January 1, 2009
are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the purchase price is allocated to
the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date
9
of acquisition. The purchase price allocations related to acquisitions made after June 30, 2008
are based on preliminary information and are subject to change when final fair value determinations
are made for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Acquisitions made after January 1, 2009
are accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to SFAS 141(R). Final valuations of assets
and liabilities are obtained and recorded as soon as practicable and within one year after the date
of the acquisition. The Company made no acquisitions during the three or six months ended June 30,
2009.
Hydra-Walk, Inc.
On May 30, 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased all of the
outstanding stock of Hydra-Walk, Inc. (Hydra-Walk). Total consideration paid was approximately
$10.6 million in cash (including post-closing adjustments) with a performance earn-out potential of
up to $2.0 million over two years from the acquisition date, if certain financial and operational
performance measures are met. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an
increase to goodwill of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to this earn-out. The
Company incurred direct transaction costs of approximately $0.1 million. Hydra-Walk was
incorporated into our Production Services segment. The acquisition of Hydra-Walk was accounted for
as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The valuation was finalized in the
second quarter of 2009.
Leader Energy Services, Ltd.
On July 22, 2008, the Company acquired all of the United States-based assets of Leader Energy
Services, Ltd. (Leader), a Canadian company. Total consideration paid was approximately $35.3
million in cash. The Company also incurred direct transaction costs of approximately $0.1 million.
The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets acquired. The acquisition of the Leader
assets was accounted for as an asset purchase as the assets acquired did not constitute a business
and therefore did not result in the establishment of goodwill. The Company did not identify any
acquired intangible assets. The Leader assets were incorporated into our Production Services
segment.
NOTE 4. OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
The table below presents comparative detailed information about the Companys current accrued
liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Accrued Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll, taxes and employee benefits |
|
$ |
43,960 |
|
|
$ |
67,408 |
|
Accrued operating expenditures |
|
|
26,393 |
|
|
|
50,833 |
|
Income, sales, use and other taxes |
|
|
34,282 |
|
|
|
41,003 |
|
Self-insurance reserves |
|
|
24,091 |
|
|
|
25,724 |
|
Unsettled legal claims |
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
Phantom share liability |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
140,460 |
|
|
$ |
197,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents comparative detailed information about the Companys other non-current
accrued liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Accrued Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
9,542 |
|
|
$ |
9,348 |
|
Environmental liabilities |
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Accrued rent |
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
Phantom share liability |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Other |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,336 |
|
|
$ |
17,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
|
Production Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
317,490 |
|
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
|
$ |
320,992 |
|
Purchase price allocation and other adjustments, net |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
317,261 |
|
|
$ |
4,077 |
|
|
$ |
321,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of our other intangible assets are as follows:
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncompete agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
14,295 |
|
|
$ |
16,309 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,549 |
) |
|
|
(4,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
9,746 |
|
|
$ |
11,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents, trademarks and tradename: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
3,558 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
(3,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
39,225 |
|
|
$ |
39,225 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(16,416 |
) |
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
22,809 |
|
|
$ |
26,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
2,045 |
|
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain of our intangible assets are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and, as
such, the values of these assets are subject to fluctuations associated with changes in exchange
rates. Amortization expense for our intangible assets was $3.4 million and $4.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expense for
our intangible assets was $6.8 million and $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
NOTE 6. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
IROC Energy Services Corp.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we owned approximately 8.7 million shares of IROC
Energy Services Corp. (IROC), an Alberta-based oilfield services company. This represented
approximately 19.7% of IROCs outstanding common stock on June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The carrying value of our investment in IROC totaled $4.0 million and $3.7 million as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We recorded $0.1 million and $1.0 million of equity
income related to our investment in IROC for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the second quarter of 2009, IROC declared a dividend which was paid to us in
June, reducing the value of our investment by approximately $0.2 million. Additionally, during the
six months ended June 30, 2009, the value of our investment in IROC increased by approximately $0.2
million due to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. and Canadian dollar.
Geostream Services Group
On October 31, 2008, we acquired a 26% interest in OOO Geostream Services Group (Geostream)
for $17.4 million. We incurred direct transaction costs of approximately $1.9 million associated
with the transaction.
The carrying value of our investment in Geostream totaled $18.1 million and $18.9 million as
of June 30, 2009 and
12
December 31, 2008, respectively. The fair value of the amount we have invested in Geostream
is in excess of the underlying book value of our investment. We recognized approximately $0.1
million and $0.7 of net loss associated with our investment in Geostream for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the value of our investment in Geostream
decreased by approximately $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to changes in
exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro.
Under the Geostream agreement, as amended, we are required to purchase an additional 24% of
Geostream no later than September 1, 2009 for approximately 11.3 million (which at June 30, 2009
was equivalent to approximately $15.9 million). The final terms of the additional investment,
including the specific structure and form of the purchase consideration are being finalized among
the parties and will be disclosed after the closing of the second investment. In addition,
following the purchase of the additional 24%, the Company will have majority representation on
Geostreams board of directors and a controlling interest. We will be required to consolidate Geostreams financial results subsequent to the purchase of the additional 24%. For a period not to exceed six years
subsequent to October 31, 2008, we have the option to increase our ownership percentage of
Geostream to 100%. However, if we have not acquired 100% of Geostream on or before the end of the
six-year period, we will be required to arrange an initial public offering for those shares.
Advanced Flow Technologies, Inc.
In September 2007, we completed the acquisition of Advanced Measurements, Inc. (AMI), a
privately-held Canadian company focused on oilfield technology. AMI owns a portion of another
Canadian company, Advanced Flow Technologies, Inc. (AFTI). As of June 30, 2009, this ownership
percentage was 48.63%, and we account for this interest using the equity method. We recorded
losses of approximately $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million associated with our investment in
AFTI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of our
investment in AFTI totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.2 million as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2009 the value
of our investment in AFTI increased by approximately $0.1 million due to changes in exchange rates
between the U.S. and Canadian dollar.
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the components of our long-term debt were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.375% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving loans due 2012 |
|
|
87,812 |
|
|
|
187,813 |
|
Other long-term indebtedness |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
Notes payable related parties, net of discount of $117 and $182, respectively |
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
20,318 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
19,058 |
|
|
|
23,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
554,276 |
|
|
$ |
659,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(25,003 |
) |
|
|
(25,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of discount |
|
$ |
529,273 |
|
|
$ |
633,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.375% Senior Notes due 2014
On November 29, 2007, the Company issued $425.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.375%
Senior Notes due 2014 (the Senior Notes), under an Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007,
among us, the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
The Senior Notes were priced at 100% of their face value to yield 8.375%. Net proceeds, after
deducting initial purchasers fees and offering expenses, were approximately $416.1 million. We
used approximately $394.9 million of the net proceeds to retire then-existing term loans, including
accrued and unpaid interest, with the balance used for general corporate purposes.
The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Accordingly, they
rank effectively subordinate to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness. The Senior
Notes are or will be jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on June 1 and
December 1 of each year. The Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2014.
13
Senior Secured Credit Facility
The Company maintains a revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks of which Bank of
America Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are the Administrative Agents (Senior Secured
Credit Facility). The Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a revolving credit facility,
letter of credit sub-facility and swing line facility of up to an aggregate principal amount of
$400.0 million, all of which will mature no later than November 29, 2012. There were borrowings of
$87.8 million and letters of credit of $53.6 million outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility at June 30, 2009. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings of the
Senior Secured Credit Facility was 2.06% at June 30, 2009. The Senior Secured Credit Facility
requires the Company to maintain a consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0,
maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of not more than 3.5 to 1.0, and to not exceed capital
expenditures of $250.0 million in any fiscal year. The Company was in compliance with these
covenants at June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $230.3 million available under its Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This availability does not include approximately $28.3 million of unfunded
commitments by Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc., a former member of the syndicate that has
declared bankruptcy. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, committed letters of
credit count against the Companys borrowing capacity. All obligations under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility are guaranteed by most of our subsidiaries and are secured by most of our assets,
including our accounts receivable, inventory and equipment.
Seller Financing Arrangement in Moncla Purchase
In connection with our acquisition of Moncla Well Service, Inc. and related entities
(collectively, Moncla) on October 25, 2007, the Company entered into two promissory notes with
the sellers. The first is an unsecured note in the amount of $12.5 million, which is due and
payable in lump-sum, together with accrued interest, on October 25, 2009. The second unsecured note
in the amount of $10.0 million is payable in annual installments of $2.0 million, plus accrued
interest, on each anniversary date through October 2012. Each of the notes bears interest at the
Federal Funds Rate, adjusted annually on the anniversary of the closing date. As of June 30, 2009,
the interest rate on these notes was 1.5%.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 36.6%
and 38.5%, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 was 37.3% and 38.9%, respectively. The primary difference between the statutory rate of
35% and our effective tax rate relates to state and foreign taxes.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $5.1 million and $5.6 million,
respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits, net of federal tax benefit, which, if recognized, would
impact our effective tax rate. We recognized tax benefits of $0.7 million and zero due to statute
expirations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. We are subject
to U.S. Federal Income Tax as well as income taxes in multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. We
have substantially concluded all U.S. federal and state tax matters through the year ended December
31, 2004.
We record expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. We
have accrued a liability of approximately $1.7 million and $2.1 million for the payment of interest
and penalties as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We believe that it is
reasonably possible that approximately $2.1 million of our currently remaining unrecognized tax
positions, each of which are individually insignificant, may be recognized in the next twelve
months as a result of a lapse of statute of limitations. No release of our deferred tax asset
valuation allowance was made during the three or six months ended June 30, 2009.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
Various suits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against us.
Due in part to the locations where we conduct business in the continental United States, we are
often subject to jury verdicts and arbitration hearings that result in outcomes in favor of the
plaintiffs. We continually assess our contingent liabilities, including potential litigation
liabilities, as well as the adequacy of our accruals and our need for the disclosure of these
items. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, we establish a provision for a
contingent liability when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount is
reasonably estimable. As of June 30, 2009, the aggregate amount of our
provisions for losses related to litigation that are deemed probable and reasonably estimable
is approximately $3.4 million. We do not believe that the disposition of any of these matters will
result in an additional loss materially in excess of the amounts that we have already recorded.
During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a net decease in our reserves of $1.2 million
related to the settlement of ongoing legal matters and the continued refinement of liabilities
recognized for litigation deemed probable and estimable.
14
Gonzales Matter
In September 2005, a class action lawsuit, Gonzales v. Key Energy Services, Inc., was filed in
Ventura County, California, Superior Court, alleging that Key did not pay its hourly employees for
travel time between the yard and the wellhead and that certain employees were denied meal and rest
periods. On September 17, 2008, we reached an agreement in principle, subject to court approval, to
settle all claims related to this matter for $1.2 million. Final approval of this settlement was
reached in the second quarter of 2009. We recorded a liability for this lawsuit in 2005, and the
resolution of this matter resulted in a recovery of a portion of the amount that we had previously
accrued.
Litigation with Former Officers and Employees
We were named in a lawsuit by our former general counsel, Jack D. Loftis, Jr., filed in the
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey on April 21, 2006, in which he alleges a
whistle-blower claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, breach of contract, breach of duties of good
faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty and wrongful termination. On August 17, 2007, the
Company filed counterclaims against Mr. Loftis alleging attorney malpractice, breach of contract
and breach of fiduciary duties. In its counterclaims, the Company seeks repayment of all severance
paid to Mr. Loftis to date (approximately $0.8 million) plus benefits paid during the period July
8, 2004 to September 21, 2004, and damages relating to the allegations of malpractice and breach of
fiduciary duties. The case was transferred to and is now pending in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania and is currently set for trial in the first quarter of 2010. We
recorded a liability for this matter in the fourth quarter of 2008 and do not believe that the
conclusion of this matter will have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
On October 17, 2006, Jane John, the ex-wife of our former chief executive officer, Francis
John, filed a complaint in Bucks County, Pennsylvania against her ex-husband and the Company. Ms.
John alleges breach of marital agreement, breach of options agreements, civil conspiracy and fraud.
She alleges that Mr. John and the Company defrauded her with regard to Mr. Johns compensation, as
well as in the disclosures of marital property. By virtue of assignments, Ms. John held 375,000
stock options which expired unexercised during a period in which the Company was not current in its
financial statements, when such options could not be exercised. In resolving a separate lawsuit
between the Company and Mr. John, Mr. John agreed to indemnify the Company with respect to damages
attributable to any and all of Ms. Johns claims, other than damages attributable to any alleged
breach of Ms. Johns stock option agreements, for which the Company agreed to indemnify Mr. John.
Discovery in the case remains ongoing, and there is currently not a trial setting. We initially
recorded a liability for this matter for the third quarter of 2008, and do not believe that the
ultimate conclusion of this matter will have a material impact on our financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
On January 11, 2008, our former chief operating officer, James Byerlotzer, filed a lawsuit in
the 55th District Court, Harris County, Texas, alleging breach of contract based on his
inability to exercise his stock options during the period that the Company was not current in its
SEC filings and the Companys failure to grant him shares of restricted stock to which he alleged
he was entitled. During the second quarter of 2009, we reached a settlement with Mr. Byerlotzer
regarding this matter. We had not previously recorded a liability for this matter and, during the
second quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge for this settlement.
On September 3, 2006, our former controller and former assistant controller filed a joint
complaint against the Company in the 133rd District Court, Harris County, Texas,
alleging constructive termination and breach of contract. We have not recorded a liability for this
matter and do not believe that the ultimate conclusion of this matter will have a material impact
on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Self-Insurance Reserves
We maintain reserves for workers compensation and vehicle liability on our balance sheet
based on our judgment and estimates using an actuarial method based on claims incurred. We estimate
general liability claims on a case-by-case basis. We maintain insurance policies for workers
compensation, vehicle liability and general liability claims. These insurance policies carry
self-insured retention limits or deductibles on a per occurrence basis. The retention limits or
deductibles are accounted for in our accrual process for all workers compensation, vehicular
liability and general liability
claims. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we have recorded $61.0 million and $68.9
million, respectively, of self-insurance reserves related to workers compensation, health
insurance, vehicular liabilities and general liability claims. Partially offsetting these
liabilities, we had approximately $8.4 million and $10.8 million of insurance receivables as of
June
15
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively. We feel that the liabilities we have recorded are
appropriate based on the known facts and circumstances and do not expect further losses materially
in excess of the amounts already accrued for existing claims.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
For environmental reserve matters, including remediation efforts for current locations and
those relating to previously disposed properties, we record liabilities when our remediation
efforts are probable and the costs to conduct such remediation efforts can be reasonably estimated.
While our litigation reserves reflect the application of our insurance coverage, our environmental
reserves do not reflect managements assessment of the insurance coverage that may apply to the
matters at issue. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we have recorded approximately $2.7
million and $3.0 million, respectively, for our environmental remediation liabilities. We feel that
the liabilities we have recorded are appropriate based on the known facts and circumstances and do
not expect further losses materially in excess of the amounts already accrued.
We provide performance bonds to provide financial surety assurances for the remediation and
maintenance of our saltwater disposal (SWD) properties, in order to comply with environmental
protection standards. Costs for SWD properties may be mandatory (to comply with applicable laws and
regulations), in the future (required to divest or cease operations), or for optimization (to
improve operations, but not for safety or regulatory compliance).
NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We present earnings per share information in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128). Under SFAS 128, basic earnings per common share is determined by
dividing net earnings applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares
actually outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the increased
number of shares that would be outstanding assuming conversion of potentially dilutive outstanding
securities using the treasury stock and as if converted methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
$ |
44,012 |
|
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
124,448 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
126,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
$ |
44,012 |
|
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
124,448 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
126,207 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
Unvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
126,521 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
127,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
exclude the potential exercise of 4.3 million and 2.3 million stock options, respectively, because
the effects of such exercises on earnings per share in those periods would be anti-dilutive. The
diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 also exclude
the potential exercise of 0.5 million and 0.6 million stock appreciation rights (SARs),
respectively, because the effects of such exercises on earnings per share in those periods would be
anti-dilutive. These options and SARs would be anti-dilutive because
of our net loss for the 2009 period
and because the exercise prices for those awards exceeded the average stock price for the Company during
the 2008 period.
16
The diluted earnings per share calculation for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
exclude the potential exercise of 4.6 million and 2.1 million stock options, respectively, because
the effects of such exercises on earnings per share in those periods would be anti-dilutive. The
diluted earnings per share calculation for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 also exclude
the potential exercises of 0.5 million and 0.6 million SARs, respectively, because the effects of
such exercises on earnings per share in those periods would be anti-dilutive. These options and
SARs would be anti-dilutive because of our net loss for the 2009 period and because the exercise prices for
those awards exceeded the average stock price for the Company during the 2008 period.
NOTE 11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recognized employee share-based compensation expense of $2.6 million and
$5.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The related income
tax benefit recognized for employee share-based compensation was $0.9 million and $1.8 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recognized employee
share-based compensation expense of $2.9 million and $8.8 million during the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized for employee share-based
compensation was $1.0 million and $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company did not capitalize any share-based compensation during the three or six
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we issued approximately 0.2 million shares of
restricted common stock to certain of our employees and officers, which vest in equal installments
over the next three years. These shares had a weighted average issuance price of $6.31 per share.
In addition, the Company issued 143,100 shares of common stock to our outside directors during the
three months ended June 30, 2009. These shares vest immediately and we recognized approximately
$0.9 million of expense related to these awards. The related income tax benefit recognized for the
common stock awards made to our outside directors was approximately $0.3 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009.
The unrecognized compensation cost related to the Companys outstanding unvested stock
options, restricted shares and phantom shares as of June 30, 2009 was $0.1 million, $8.0 million
and $1.0 million, respectively, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.0 years, 1.6 years and 1.4 years, respectively.
NOTE 12. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Transactions with Employees
In connection with an acquisition in 2008, the former owner of the acquiree became an employee
of the Company. At the time of and subsequent to the acquisition, the employee also owns an
exploration and production company. Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company continued to provide
services to this exploration and production company. The prices charged for these services are at
rates that are an average of the prices charged to our other customers in the California market. As
of June 30, 2009, our receivables with this company totaled approximately $0.3 million. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, revenues from this company totaled approximately $0.6
million and $2.4 million, respectively.
Board of Director Relationship with Customer
In October 2007, we added a member to our board of directors who is the Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (Anadarko),
which is one of our customers. Sales to Anadarko comprised less than 2% of our total revenues for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Transactions with Anadarko for
our services are made at market prices.
Board of Director Stock Option Settlement Agreement
On April 3 2009, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims with each of Kevin P. Collins and W. Phillip Marcum, two current members of the Companys board of directors. These agreements relate to a total of 140,000 stock options held by those directors which expired unexercised during the period before the Company became current with its financial statements.
Pursuant to these agreements, the Company paid the directors approximately $0.2 million each, and the directors fully released and discharged the Company from any and against all claims they had or could have asserted with respect to their expired stock options.
NOTE 13. ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial
instruments as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. SFAS 107 defines the fair value of a
financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between two willing parties. No material changes have occurred to the methodologies or
assumptions regarding the fair values of our financial instruments from those disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we have not elected the fair
value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities pursuant
to SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
The carrying values of our cash
and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values at the
respective balance sheet dates because of the short maturity and highly liquid nature of these
instruments and are not included in the table below.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable related parties |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.375% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
377,188 |
|
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
282,115 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving loans |
|
|
87,812 |
|
|
|
87,812 |
|
|
|
187,813 |
|
|
|
187,813 |
|
Notes payable related parties |
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
20,318 |
|
|
|
20,318 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable related parties. The amounts reported relate to notes
receivable from certain employees of the Company related to relocation loans and retention
agreements, as well as our trade accounts receivable with related parties. The carrying values of
these instruments approximate their fair values as of the respective balance sheet dates due to
their short maturity dates.
8.375% Senior Notes. The fair value of our Senior Notes is based on quoted market prices as
of the respective balance sheet dates. The carrying value for the Senior Notes was $425.0 million
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and the fair value of the Senior Notes was
$377.2 million and $282.1 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving loans. Because of their variable interest rates and
the underlying security, the fair values of the revolving loans borrowed under our Senior Secured
Credit Facility approximate their carrying values as of December 31, 2008. The carrying values and
fair values of these loans were approximately $87.8 million and $187.8 million as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Notes payable related parties. The amounts reported relate to a seller financing
arrangement that we entered into in connection with an acquisition we made during 2007. The
carrying values of these notes approximate their fair values as of the respective balance sheet
dates due to their variable interest rates.
NOTE 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company revised its reportable business segments effective in the first quarter of 2009.
The new operating segments are Well Servicing and Production Services. Financial results as of and
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 have been restated to reflect the change in
operating segments. The Company revised its segments to reflect changes in managements resource
allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the Company. Our rig services
and fluid management operations are aggregated within our Well Servicing segment. Our pressure
pumping, fishing, rental and cased-hole electric wireline operations, as well as our technology
development group in Canada, are now aggregated within our Production Services segment. These
changes reflect the Companys current operating focus in compliance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131). We aggregate services that
create our reportable segments in accordance with SFAS 131, and the accounting policies for our
segments are the same as those described in Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. We evaluate the performance of our operating segments based on
revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), which
is a non-GAAP measure and is not disclosed below. All inter-segment sales pricing is based on
current market conditions. Additionally, we have aggregated all of our operating segments that do
not meet the aggregation criteria established in SFAS 131 to form a Functional Support segment.
Functional Support expenses include expenses associated with managing all of our other reportable
segments.
The
following is a description of our operating segments:
Well Servicing
Rig Services
This segment includes the maintenance of existing wells, workover of existing wells,
completion of newly drilled wells, drilling of horizontal wells, recompletion of existing wells
(re-entering a well to complete the well in a new geologic
zone or formation) and plugging and
abandonment of wells at the end of their useful lives.
18
Workover services are performed to enhance the production of existing wells. Such services
include extensions of existing wells to drain new formations either by deepening wellbores to new
zones or by drilling horizontal or lateral wellbores to improve reservoir drainage. In less
extensive workovers, our rigs are used to seal off depleted zones in existing wellbores and access
previously bypassed productive zones.
Our completion services prepare a newly drilled oil or natural gas well for production. We
typically provide a well service rig and may also provide other equipment such as a workover
package to assist in the completion process.
Fluid Management Services
This segment also provides fluid management services, including oilfield transportation and
produced-water disposal services. Our oilfield transportation and produced-water disposal services
include vacuum truck services, fluid transportation services and disposal services for operators
whose oil or natural gas wells produce saltwater and other fluids. In addition, we are a supplier
of frac tanks which are used for temporary storage of fluids in conjunction with the fluid hauling
operations. Our fluid management services will collect, transport and dispose of the saltwater.
These fluids are removed from the well site and transported for disposal in a saltwater disposal
(SWD) well.
Production Services
This segment provides multiple services as described below:
Pressure Pumping Services
We provide well stimulation and cementing services to oil and natural gas producers. Well
stimulation services include fracturing, nitrogen, coiled tubing and acidizing services. These
services (which may be completion or workover services) are used to enhance the production of oil
and natural gas wells from formations which exhibit restricted flow of oil and natural gas. In the
fracturing process, we typically pump fluid and sized sand, or proppants, into a well at high
pressure in order to fracture the formation and thereby increase the flow of oil and natural gas.
With our cementing services, we pump cement into a well between the casing and the wellbore.
Fishing Services
We provide fishing services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast, Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We also
provided limited services offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Fishing services involve recovering lost
or stuck equipment in the wellbore utilizing a fishing tool.
Rental Services
We provide rental services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast, Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We offer a
full line of services and rental equipment designed for use both onshore and offshore for drilling
and workover services. Our rental tool inventory consists of drill pipe, tubulars, handling tools
(including our patented Hydra-Walk ® pipe-handling units and services), pressure-control
equipment,
power swivels and foam air units.
Cased-hole Electric Wireline Services
We perform activities at various times throughout the life of the well including perforating,
completion logging, production logging and casing integrity services. After the wellbore is cased
and cemented, we can provide a number of services. Perforating creates the flow path between the
reservoir and the wellbore. Production logging can be performed throughout the life of the well to
measure temperature, fluid type, flow rate, pressure and other reservoir characteristics. This
service helps the operator analyze and monitor well performance and determine when a well may need
a workover or further stimulation.
19
The following tables set forth our segment information as of and for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
197,945 |
|
|
$ |
43,513 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
241,458 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
182,423 |
|
|
|
52,383 |
|
|
|
27,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,439 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
15,522 |
|
|
|
(8,870 |
) |
|
|
(27,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,981 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
16,858 |
|
|
|
(7,935 |
) |
|
|
(38,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,255,987 |
|
|
|
347,567 |
|
|
|
600,086 |
|
|
|
(397,728 |
) |
|
|
1,805,912 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
|
11,038 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,612 |
|
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
370,859 |
|
|
$ |
131,144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
502,003 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
285,441 |
|
|
|
103,136 |
|
|
|
34,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,008 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,418 |
|
|
|
28,008 |
|
|
|
(34,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,995 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
11,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
85,795 |
|
|
|
29,583 |
|
|
|
(44,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,381,727 |
|
|
|
446,843 |
|
|
|
472,741 |
|
|
|
(363,550 |
) |
|
|
1,937,761 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
27,293 |
|
|
|
12,433 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,996 |
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
454,206 |
|
|
$ |
119,241 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
573,447 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
397,669 |
|
|
|
131,671 |
|
|
|
53,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,128 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
56,537 |
|
|
|
(12,430 |
) |
|
|
(53,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,681 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
21,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,829 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
58,272 |
|
|
|
(11,786 |
) |
|
|
(74,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,255,987 |
|
|
|
347,567 |
|
|
|
600,086 |
|
|
|
(397,728 |
) |
|
|
1,805,912 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
32,584 |
|
|
|
28,827 |
|
|
|
5,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,409 |
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
709,372 |
|
|
$ |
249,030 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
958,402 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
538,499 |
|
|
|
196,109 |
|
|
|
77,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,357 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
170,873 |
|
|
|
52,921 |
|
|
|
(77,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,045 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(862 |
) |
|
|
22,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,119 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
170,982 |
|
|
|
55,122 |
|
|
|
(97,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,381,727 |
|
|
|
446,843 |
|
|
|
472,741 |
|
|
|
(363,550 |
) |
|
|
1,937,761 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
52,806 |
|
|
|
16,120 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,371 |
|
20
The following tables present information related to our operations on a geographical basis as
of and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Argentina |
|
Mexico |
|
Canada |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months
ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
197,274 |
|
|
$ |
16,077 |
|
|
$ |
27,874 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
241,458 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
1,436,549 |
|
|
|
22,804 |
|
|
|
57,254 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
(90,489 |
) |
|
|
1,433,671 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
|
|
17,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months
ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
460,338 |
|
|
$ |
29,740 |
|
|
$ |
9,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
502,003 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
1,419,408 |
|
|
|
29,551 |
|
|
|
24,435 |
|
|
|
7,072 |
|
|
|
(57,344 |
) |
|
|
1,423,122 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
|
|
32,987 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
7,262 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
482,017 |
|
|
$ |
35,413 |
|
|
$ |
55,570 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
573,447 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
1,436,549 |
|
|
|
22,804 |
|
|
|
57,254 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
(90,489 |
) |
|
|
1,433,671 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
|
|
48,349 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
880,832 |
|
|
$ |
56,606 |
|
|
$ |
15,461 |
|
|
$ |
5,503 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
958,402 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
1,419,408 |
|
|
|
29,551 |
|
|
|
24,435 |
|
|
|
7,072 |
|
|
|
(57,344 |
) |
|
|
1,423,122 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
|
|
56,515 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
13,735 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,371 |
|
NOTE 15. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we issued the Senior Notes, which are guaranteed by
virtually all of our domestic subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. These guarantees are
joint and several, full, complete and unconditional. There are no restrictions on the ability of
subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to the parent company.
As a result of these guarantee arrangements, we are required to present the following
condensed consolidating financial information pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, Financial
Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.
21
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
45,820 |
|
|
$ |
244,497 |
|
|
$ |
81,768 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
372,241 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011,244 |
|
|
|
24,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035,970 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,888 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,338 |
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,509 |
|
Intercompany notes and accounts
receivable and investments in
subsidiaries |
|
|
1,908,216 |
|
|
|
535,204 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
(2,445,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
22,095 |
|
|
|
41,093 |
|
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,985,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,148,926 |
|
|
$ |
116,730 |
|
|
$ |
(2,445,384 |
) |
|
$ |
1,805,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
9,231 |
|
|
$ |
154,322 |
|
|
$ |
27,534 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191,087 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,420 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less
current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
512,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes and accounts payable |
|
|
429,094 |
|
|
|
1,488,738 |
|
|
|
64,490 |
|
|
|
(1,982,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
189,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,203 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
52,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
54,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders and members equity |
|
|
843,061 |
|
|
|
436,876 |
|
|
|
26,296 |
|
|
|
(463,172 |
) |
|
|
843,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,985,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,148,926 |
|
|
$ |
116,730 |
|
|
$ |
(2,445,384 |
) |
|
$ |
1,805,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
29,673 |
|
|
$ |
440,758 |
|
|
$ |
88,534 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
559,122 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025,007 |
|
|
|
26,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,051,683 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,669 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,992 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
10,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes and accounts
receivable and investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,917,522 |
|
|
|
419,554 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
(2,338,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
22,597 |
|
|
|
48,237 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,980,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
125,111 |
|
|
$ |
(2,338,694 |
) |
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
13,792 |
|
|
$ |
231,528 |
|
|
$ |
28,054 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
273,373 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less
current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
612,813 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes and accounts payable |
|
|
305,348 |
|
|
|
1,624,932 |
|
|
|
69,204 |
|
|
|
(1,999,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
187,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,581 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,386 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders and members equity |
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
312,650 |
|
|
|
26,559 |
|
|
|
(339,209 |
) |
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,980,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
125,111 |
|
|
$ |
(2,338,694 |
) |
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
208,107 |
|
|
$ |
45,357 |
|
|
$ |
(12,006 |
) |
|
$ |
241,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,167 |
|
|
|
35,967 |
|
|
|
(8,281 |
) |
|
|
173,853 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,690 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,191 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
40,028 |
|
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
45,395 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
10,328 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
(2,877 |
) |
|
|
(2,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
226,225 |
|
|
|
44,410 |
|
|
|
(11,157 |
) |
|
|
270,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(11,111 |
) |
|
|
(18,118 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
|
(29,131 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
12,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
|
$ |
(18,118 |
) |
|
$ |
(591 |
) |
|
$ |
(849 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
465,542 |
|
|
$ |
41,114 |
|
|
$ |
(4,653 |
) |
|
$ |
502,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,612 |
|
|
|
28,209 |
|
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
322,488 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,404 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,271 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
52,459 |
|
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
58,249 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
(2,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
11,034 |
|
|
|
389,066 |
|
|
|
34,947 |
|
|
|
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
430,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(11,034 |
) |
|
|
76,476 |
|
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
71,247 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(24,395 |
) |
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(35,429 |
) |
|
|
74,986 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
43,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(35,429 |
) |
|
$ |
74,986 |
|
|
$ |
4,817 |
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
44,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
502,380 |
|
|
$ |
93,560 |
|
|
$ |
(22,493 |
) |
|
$ |
573,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,808 |
|
|
|
68,950 |
|
|
|
(15,678 |
) |
|
|
401,080 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,946 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,947 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
84,254 |
|
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
94,101 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
21,460 |
|
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,829 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
5,369 |
|
|
|
(5,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
22,795 |
|
|
|
513,397 |
|
|
|
86,243 |
|
|
|
(20,986 |
) |
|
|
601,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(22,795 |
) |
|
|
(11,017 |
) |
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
(1,507 |
) |
|
|
(28,002 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
13,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(9,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,017 |
) |
|
$ |
4,079 |
|
|
$ |
(1,507 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
888,163 |
|
|
$ |
77,571 |
|
|
$ |
(7,332 |
) |
|
$ |
958,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,383 |
|
|
|
53,875 |
|
|
|
(5,129 |
) |
|
|
604,129 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,455 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,247 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
125,981 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
21,817 |
|
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
20,119 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
(1,618 |
) |
|
|
(2,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
22,010 |
|
|
|
746,091 |
|
|
|
68,860 |
|
|
|
(6,713 |
) |
|
|
830,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(22,010 |
) |
|
|
142,072 |
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
128,154 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(44,879 |
) |
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
|
|
(2,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(66,889 |
) |
|
|
140,021 |
|
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(66,889 |
) |
|
$ |
140,021 |
|
|
$ |
5,983 |
|
|
$ |
(619 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152,221 |
|
|
$ |
5,078 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,717 |
) |
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,409 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
98,624 |
|
|
|
15,187 |
|
|
|
9,981 |
|
|
|
(123,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
3,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used in) by investing activities |
|
|
98,823 |
|
|
|
(46,712 |
) |
|
|
8,289 |
|
|
|
(123,792 |
) |
|
|
(63,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(108,605 |
) |
|
|
(15,300 |
) |
|
|
123,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(7,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(98,823 |
) |
|
|
(115,738 |
) |
|
|
(15,300 |
) |
|
|
123,792 |
|
|
|
(106,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,229 |
) |
|
|
(2,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,848 |
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,619 |
|
|
$ |
14,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(1,695 |
) |
|
$ |
151,179 |
|
|
$ |
12,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,376 |
) |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,371 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,619 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
(90,972 |
) |
|
|
(134,266 |
) |
|
|
(1,815 |
) |
|
|
227,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(90,972 |
) |
|
|
(264,567 |
) |
|
|
(2,810 |
) |
|
|
227,053 |
|
|
|
(131,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(95,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,879 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
131,193 |
|
|
|
92,786 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
(227,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
(5,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
92,667 |
|
|
|
86,850 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
(227,053 |
) |
|
|
(44,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,538 |
) |
|
|
13,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,358 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,820 |
|
|
$ |
25,639 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Key Energy Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its controlled subsidiaries
(collectively, Key, the Company, we, us, its, and our) provide a complete range of
services to major oil companies, foreign national oil companies and independent oil and natural gas
production companies, including rig-based services, fluid management services, pressure pumping
services, fishing services, rental services, and cased-hole electric wireline services. We operate
in most major oil and natural gas producing regions of the United States as well as internationally
in Argentina and Mexico. We also own a technology development company based in Canada and have
equity interests in oilfield service companies in Canada and the Russian Federation.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes as of June 30, 2009 and for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, included elsewhere herein, and
the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we operated in two business segments,
Well Servicing and Production Services. We also have a Functional Support segment associated with
managing all of our reportable operating segments. For a full description of our segments, see Item
1. Financial Statements Note 14. Segment Information.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
In determining the overall health of the oilfield service industry, we believe the Baker
Hughes U.S. land drilling rig count is the best barometer of capital spending and activity levels,
since this data is made publicly available on a weekly basis. Historically, our activity levels
have correlated well with capital spending by oil and natural gas producers. When commodity prices
are strong, capital spending by our customers tends to be high. As the following table indicates,
the land drilling rig count has fallen dramatically since the fourth quarter of 2008, prices for
natural gas have declined significantly, and prices for crude oil have remained volatile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Henry |
|
Hughes U.S. |
|
|
WTI Cushing Oil |
|
Hub Natural Gas |
|
Land Drilling |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
Rigs (2) |
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
59.69 |
|
|
$ |
3.71 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
97.94 |
|
|
$ |
8.74 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
123.95 |
|
|
$ |
11.47 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
118.05 |
|
|
$ |
8.99 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
59.06 |
|
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the average price for the periods presented. Source: EIA / Bloomberg
|
|
(2) |
|
Source: www.bakerhughes.com |
Internally, we measure activity levels in our Well Servicing segment primarily through our rig
and trucking hours. As capital spending by our customer base increases, demand for our services
generally rises, resulting in increased rig and trucking services and more hours worked.
Conversely, when activity levels decline due to lower spending by our customer base, we generally
provide fewer services, which results in lower hours worked. The number of rig and trucking hours,
as well as pricing, may also be affected by increases in industry capacity. We publicly release our
monthly rig and trucking
hours. The following table presents our quarterly rig and trucking hours from the first
quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009:
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Hours |
|
|
Trucking Hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
489,819 |
|
|
|
499,247 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
415,520 |
|
|
|
416,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
659,462 |
|
|
|
585,040 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
701,286 |
|
|
|
603,632 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
721,285 |
|
|
|
620,885 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
634,772 |
|
|
|
607,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2008 |
|
|
2,716,805 |
|
|
|
2,416,561 |
|
MARKET CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
Market Conditions Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
Market conditions continued to worsen during the second quarter of 2009 and the decline in our
revenue, net income and earnings per share were reflective of the reduction in activity that we
have experienced continuously since the fourth quarter of 2008. Our Well Servicing segment
experienced a decline in rig hours per working day of approximately 15.2% from the first quarter of
2009 and 39.8% from the second quarter of 2008; trucking hours experienced a similar decline during
the second quarter, down approximately 16.6% from the first quarter of 2009 and 29.9% from the
second quarter of 2008. Our Production Services segment is more dependent on natural gas related
activity and therefore experienced more severe declines in activity compared to our Well Servicing
segment, which is more closely associated with oil directed activity. The average price per MMBtu
for natural gas at the Henry Hub declined approximately 18.6% during the second quarter of 2009
compared to the first quarter of 2009 and the average price for West Texas Intermediate crude oil
at Cushing, Oklahoma increased approximately 38.2% during the second quarter of 2009 compared to
the first quarter of 2009. The average Baker-Hughes U.S. Land rig count for natural gas directed
activity during the second quarter of 2009 was 692, which was approximately 31.5% lower than the
average natural gas rig count of 1,010 during the first quarter of 2009, and the average oil rig
count during the second quarter of 2009 was 193, down approximately 30.3% from the first quarter
average count of 277. However, the count of oil directed rigs at June 30, 2009 was 215, up from
the low of 173 in early June.
In addition to lower activity levels, all of our operating segments continued to experience
negative pricing pressure during the second quarter which also negatively impacted revenues. In
response to the continued deterioration of market conditions, we continued to reduce our cost
structure, including further headcount and compensation reductions. The decline in market activity
was consistent throughout the quarter, although we began to witness an increase in oil directed
activity late in the quarter. These market activity increases in the rig services industry were
driven primarily by small and mid-sized independent operators, and a large volume of this work is
heavily focused on repair and maintenance related activity and is being aggressively priced. Key
has chosen not to pursue some opportunities in this sector of the market. We did not see our major
customers increase their spending in response to the increase in crude oil prices during the
quarter.
Internationally, we were operating 21 rigs in Mexico by the end of the second quarter, and
these assets continued to generate positive earnings for the Company. However, in Argentina, the
labor issues that we are experiencing continue to negatively impact earnings. During the second
quarter, we began the process of reducing the size of our workforce in Argentina. Some disruptions
of business activity have occurred in connection with this process and future disruptions remain
possible as we continue our efforts to rationalize the size of our labor force in Argentina
relative to the available work opportunities.
Market Outlook for the Remainder of 2009
Although current oil price economics might be expected to lead to higher activity levels, we
have not received indications from our major customers that would suggest planned spending
increases in the rig services market for our Well Servicing segment. We expect that activity
levels from our major customer base will remain relatively unchanged for the balance of 2009, or
until these customers budget allocations are increased. As such, we believe that the remainder of
2009 will continue to present challenges which will necessitate a more comprehensive
rationalization of our infrastructure and
support cost base.
28
Within our Production Services segment, which is heavily dependent on natural gas price
economics, we believe activity will remain depressed through 2010. At some of our facilities, we
have taken steps to discontinue the provision of certain pressure pumping services based on local
activity levels. In this process, assets have been and will continue to be relocated and
consolidated in markets where we believe customer activity provides better opportunities for asset
utilization.
Opportunities for our services continue to increase in Mexico. Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)
has recently requested that we provide an additional three new rig packages, together with electric
wireline and slickline units, which we anticipate will be delivered before the end of 2009. We
also plan to expand our investment in Russia with an increase of our ownership interest in OOO
Geostream Services Group (Geostream) to 50% during the third quarter. In addition, we will be
providing oilfield services equipment to Geostream to take advantage of work opportunities. We
anticipate the equipment will be delivered beginning late in the third quarter of 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table shows our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
241,458 |
|
|
$ |
502,003 |
|
|
$ |
573,447 |
|
|
$ |
958,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
173,853 |
|
|
|
322,488 |
|
|
|
401,080 |
|
|
|
604,129 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
43,191 |
|
|
|
42,271 |
|
|
|
87,947 |
|
|
|
82,247 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
45,395 |
|
|
|
58,249 |
|
|
|
94,101 |
|
|
|
125,981 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
10,181 |
|
|
|
10,079 |
|
|
|
19,829 |
|
|
|
20,119 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
270,589 |
|
|
|
430,756 |
|
|
|
601,449 |
|
|
|
830,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(29,131 |
) |
|
|
71,247 |
|
|
|
(28,002 |
) |
|
|
128,154 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
(27,446 |
) |
|
|
10,433 |
|
|
|
(49,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(18,473 |
) |
|
|
43,801 |
|
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(18,473 |
) |
|
$ |
44,012 |
|
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
78,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
124,448 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
126,207 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
126,521 |
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
127,914 |
|
A detailed review of our operations, including a review of our segments, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, is provided below.
Consolidated Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Our consolidated revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $260.5 million, or
51.9%, to $241.5
million from $502.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. See Segment
Operating Results Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 below for a more detailed
discussion of the change in our revenues.
29
Direct Operating Expenses
Our consolidated direct operating expenses decreased $148.6 million, or 46.1%, to $173.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $322.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008. These costs were 72.0% of revenue during the second quarter of 2009, compared
to 64.2% during the same period in 2008. See Segment Operating Results Three Months Ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 below for a more detailed discussion of the change in our direct operating
expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $0.9 million, or 2.2%, to $43.2
million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $42.3 million for the same period
in 2008. The increase in our depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to
acquisitions we completed in the last twelve months and the expansion of our operations in Mexico,
as well as accelerated depreciation related to assets that we removed from service during the
second quarter of 2009 in response to the downturn in market conditions.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $12.9 million, or 22.1%, to $45.4
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $58.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008. General and administrative expense was 18.8% of revenue for the second quarter
of 2009, compared to 11.6% of revenue for the same period in 2008. Our general and administrative
expenses declined as a result of lower employee compensation attributable to headcount, wage rate
and benefits reductions that we put in place beginning in late 2008 and continuing into 2009 in
response to the downturn in activity levels. Equity-based compensation was also lower in the second
quarter of 2009 as a result of our having accelerated the vesting period on the majority of our
stock option awards and stock appreciation rights (SARs) that were out of the money during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a result, no expense was recognized on these awards during the three
months ended June 30, 2009.
Interest Expense, net of amounts capitalized
Interest expense increased approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The slight increase in interest expense was due to less
capitalization of interest as our capital expenditures have decreased in response to market
conditions.
Gain on disposal of assets, net
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a net gain on asset disposals of
approximately $1.4 million, compared to a net gain of approximately $0.4 million during the same
period in 2008. From time to time we sell assets in the normal course of business consistent with
our operational needs. Also included here are disposals of insured assets that are damaged or
destroyed and for which we file claims with our insurance carriers. We recognize gains or losses,
as appropriate, based on the difference between the proceeds received from the disposal and the
carrying value of the asset.
Interest Income
Interest income was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Interest income was flat due to declines in interest rates offset by higher average cash and cash equivalents balances during the second quarter of 2009.
Other Income, net
Other income, net decreased $1.3 million to approximately $0.5 million during the second quarter of 2009 compared to $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2008. Other income, net is primarily attributable to our pro-rata share of the income or loss from our equity-method investments in IROC Energy Services Corp. (IROC), Advanced Flow Technologies, Inc. (AFTI)
and Geostream and foreign currency transaction gains and losses from our international operations.
30
Income Tax Expense
Our income tax benefit
was $10.7 million on a pre-tax loss of $29.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to income tax expense of $27.4 million on pre-tax income of $71.2 million for the same
period in 2008. Our effective tax rate was 36.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 38.5%
for the three months ended June 30, 2008; the
decrease during the second quarter of 2009 was a result of our projections of the level of full-year taxable
income for 2009.
Consolidated Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Our consolidated revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $385.0 million, or 40.2%, to $573.4 million from $958.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. See Segment Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 below for a more detailed discussion of the change in our revenues.
Direct Operating Expenses
Our consolidated direct operating expenses decreased $203.0 million, or 33.6%, to $401.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $604.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. These costs were 69.9% of revenue during the second quarter of 2009, compared to 63.0% during the same period in 2008. See Segment Results of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 below for a more detailed discussion of the change in our direct operating expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $5.7 million, or 6.9%, to $87.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $82.2 million for the same period in 2008. The increase in our depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to acquisitions we completed in the last twelve months, the expansion of our operations in Mexico, and
accelerated depreciation for assets that we removed from service in response to the downturn in market conditions.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $31.9 million, or 25.3%, to $94.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $126.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. General and administrative expense was 16.4% of revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 13.1% of revenue for the
same period in 2008. Our
general and administrative expenses declined as a result of cost cutting measures that we put in place beginning in late 2008 and continuing into 2009 related to reductions in headcount, employee wage rate and benefits reductions, and controlled spending in overhead costs. Equity-based compensation was also lower during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of our having accelerated the vesting period on the majority of our stock option and SAR awards that were out of
the money during
the fourth quarter
of 2008. As a result, no expense was recognized on these awards during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Interest Expense, net of amounts capitalized
Interest expense decreased
approximately $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008.
The decline in interest expense is primarily attributable to lower interest rates on our variable-rate debt
instruments, partially offset by higher average debt levels during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
In June 2009 we paid down approximately $100.0 million on the revolving portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Gain on disposal of assets, net
During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, we recognized a net gain on asset disposals of approximately $0.7 million, compared to a net
gain of approximately $0.6 million during the same period in 2008. From time to time we sell assets in the normal
course of business consistent with our operational needs. Also included here are disposals of insured assets that are
damaged or destroyed and for which we file claims with our insurance carriers. We recognize gains or losses, as appropriate, based on the difference between the proceeds received from the disposal and the carrying value of the asset.
Interest Income
31
Interest income decreased approximately $0.3 million to $0.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in interest income
is primarily attributable to declines in interest rates, partially offset by our higher average
cash and cash equivalents balances during the period.
Other Income, net
Other income, net decreased approximately $0.5 million to $0.4 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.9 million during the same period of 2008. Other income, net is
primarily attributable to our pro-rata share of the income or loss from our equity-method
investments in IROC, AFTI and Geostream and foreign currency transaction gains and losses from our
international operations.
Income Tax Expense
Our income tax benefit was $10.4 million on a pre-tax loss of $28.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to income tax expense of $49.9 million on pre-tax income of $128.2
million for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rate was 37.3% for the six months ended June
30, 2009 compared to 38.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2008; the decrease during the first
half of 2009 was a result of our projections of the level of full-year taxable income for 2009.
Segment Operating Results Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table shows operating results for each of our segments, net of intersegment
eliminations, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands,
except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well |
|
Production |
|
Functional |
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
Revenues |
|
$ |
197,945 |
|
|
$ |
43,513 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
182,423 |
|
|
|
52,383 |
|
|
|
27,633 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
15,522 |
|
|
|
(8,870 |
) |
|
|
(27,633 |
) |
Operating income (loss), as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
(20.4 |
)% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well |
|
Production |
|
Functional |
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
Revenues |
|
$ |
370,859 |
|
|
$ |
131,144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
285,441 |
|
|
|
103,136 |
|
|
|
34,431 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,418 |
|
|
|
28,008 |
|
|
|
(34,431 |
) |
Operating income (loss), as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Well Servicing
Revenues for our Well Servicing segment decreased $172.9 million, or 46.6%, to $197.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $370.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008. The decline in revenues is attributable to lower activity levels and negative
pricing pressure as a result of the general downturn in the markets for our services. During the
three months ended June 30, 2009, the primary focus of market activity for our U.S. rig services
business shifted more towards lower margin repair and maintenance work, and much of this work was
being performed for small and mid-sized independent operators. Our traditional customer base of
major and large independent producers decreased their
activity levels during the period, which led to lower activity and pricing for our U.S. rig
services business. Partially offsetting these declines were revenues attributable to the expansion
of our operations in Mexico.
Operating expenses for our Well Servicing segment were $182.4 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, which represented a decrease of $103.0 million, or 36.1%, compared to $285.4
million for the same period in 2008. Operating expenses were 92.2% of revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 77.0% of revenue for the same
32
period in 2008. The decline in operating
expenses during the second quarter of 2009 was attributable to lower employee compensation, lower
repairs and maintenance expenses, and lower fuel costs. These costs declined due to our lower
activity levels associated with the lower demand for our services in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008, lower fuel prices, and cost control measures we put in place
beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to the downturn in demand for our services.
Production Services
Revenues for our Production Services segment decreased $87.6 million, or 66.8%, to $43.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $131.1 million for the same period in
2008. The decline in revenue for this segment is primarily attributable to lower asset utilization
resulting from the decline in land drilling activity in the continental United States, and the
resulting pressure on pricing as service providers attempt to maintain market share.
Operating expenses for our Production Services segment decreased $50.8 million, or 49.2%, to
$52.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $103.1 million for the same
period of 2008. Operating expenses were 120.4% of revenue and 78.6% of revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operating expenses declined due to declines associated
with reductions in activity, lower fuel prices, decreased expenses for frac sand, and cost control
measures we put in place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to the downturn in
demand for our services.
Functional Support
Operating expenses for Functional Support, which represent expenses associated with managing
our reportable operating segments, declined approximately $6.8 million, or 19.7%, to $27.6 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $34.4 million for the same period in 2008.
Operating expenses declined as a result of cost cutting measures that we put in place beginning in
late 2008 and continuing into 2009 related to reductions in headcount, employee wage rates and
benefits reductions, and controlled spending in overhead costs. Equity-based compensation was also
lower during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of our having accelerated the vesting
period on the majority of our stock option and SARs awards that were out of the money during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a result, no expense was recognized on these awards during the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
Segment Operating Results Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table shows operating results for each of our segments, net of intersegment
eliminations, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands,
except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
Well Servicing |
|
Production Services |
|
Functional Support |
Revenues |
|
$ |
454,206 |
|
|
$ |
119,241 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
397,669 |
|
|
|
131,671 |
|
|
|
53,788 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
56,537 |
|
|
|
(12,430 |
) |
|
|
(53,788 |
) |
Operating income (loss), as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
Well Servicing |
|
Production Services |
|
Functional Support |
Revenues |
|
$ |
709,372 |
|
|
$ |
249,030 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
538,499 |
|
|
|
196,109 |
|
|
|
77,749 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
170,873 |
|
|
|
52,921 |
|
|
|
(77,749 |
) |
Operating income (loss), as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Well Servicing
33
Revenues for our Well Servicing segment decreased $255.2 million, or 36.0%, to $454.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $709.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008. The decline in revenues is attributable to lower activity levels and negative pricing
pressure as a result of the general downturn in the markets for our services. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the primary focus of market activity for our U.S. rig services business
shifted more towards lower margin repair and maintenance work, and much of this work was being
performed for small and mid-sized independent operators. Our traditional customer base of major
and large independent producers decreased their activity levels during the period, which led to
lower activity and pricing for our U.S. rig services business. Partially offsetting these declines
were revenues attributable to the expansion of our operations in Mexico.
Operating expenses for our Well Servicing segment were $397.7 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2009, which represented a decrease of $140.8 million, or 26.2%, compared to $538.5
million for the same period in 2008. Operating expenses were 87.6% of revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 75.9% of revenue for the same period in 2008. The decline in operating
expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was attributable to lower employee compensation,
lower repairs and maintenance expenses, and lower fuel costs. These costs declined due to our lower
activity levels associated with the lower demand for our services during the first six months of
2009 compared to the same period in 2008, lower fuel prices, and cost control measures we put in
place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to the downturn in demand for our
services.
Production Services
Revenues for our Production Services segment decreased $129.8 million, or 52.1%, to $119.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $249.0 million for the same period in
2008. The overall decline in revenue for this segment is primarily attributable to lower asset
utilization resulting from the decline in land drilling activity in the continental United States,
and the resulting pressure on pricing as service providers attempt to maintain market share.
Operating expenses for our Production Services segment decreased $64.4 million, or 32.9%, to
$131.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $196.1 million for the same
period in 2008. Operating expenses were 110.4% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to 78.7% for the same period in 2008. Operating expenses declined due to reductions in
activity, lower fuel prices, lower expenses for frac sand, and cost control measures we put in
place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to the downturn in demand for our
services.
Functional Support
Operating expenses for Functional Support declined approximately $24.0 million, or 30.8%, to
$53.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $77.7 million for the same period
in 2008. Operating expenses declined as a result of cost cutting measures that we put in place
beginning in late 2008 and continuing into 2009 related to reductions in headcount, employee wage
rates and benefits reductions, and controlled spending in overhead costs. Equity-based compensation
was also lower during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of our having accelerated the
vesting period on the majority of our stock option and SAR awards that were out of the money
during the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result, no expense was recognized on these awards during
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We require capital to fund ongoing operations, organic growth initiatives and acquisitions.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from our operations, available cash and
cash equivalents, and availability under our Senior Secured Credit Facility (defined below). We
intend to use these sources of liquidity to fund our working capital requirements, capital
expenditures, strategic investments and acquisitions. In connection with our business strategy, we
regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities, including equipment and businesses.
We believe that our internally generated cash flows from operations and current reserves of
cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to finance the majority of our cash requirements for
current and future operations, budgeted capital
expenditures and debt service for the next twelve months. As we have historically done, we
may, from time to time, access available funds under our Senior Secured Credit Facility to meet our
cash requirements for day-to-day operations and in times of peak needs throughout the year. Our
planned capital expenditures, as well as any acquisitions we choose to pursue, could be financed
through a combination of cash on hand, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our Senior
Secured Credit Facility and, in the case of acquisitions, equity.
As of June 30, 2009, we had working capital (excluding the current portion of long-term debt,
notes payable to related parties, and capital lease obligations totaling $25.0 million) of $206.2
million. Working capital at December 31, 2008
34
(excluding the current portion of long-term debt,
notes payable to related parties, and capital lease obligations totaling $25.7 million) was $311.5
million. Our working capital at June 30, 2009 decreased from December 31, 2008 as a result of
decreased cash and cash equivalents, due primarily to the repayment of $100.0 million on our
revolving credit facility, and decreased accounts receivable due to decreased revenues during the
period. Partially offsetting these declines were higher income tax receivables due to our current
taxable losses and projections of the level of full-year taxable income, lower accounts payable and
lower accrued expenses due to the decline in our activity levels.
As of June 30, 2009, we had $79.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Of this amount, up to
$5.8 million of our accounts were guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
including under the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. In addition, $39.8 million of our
cash held in money market accounts as of June 30, 2009 was guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury
Departments Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds. The Companys cash deposits in
excess of these amounts were not insured or guaranteed. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $14.0
million of our cash and cash equivalents was held in the bank accounts of our foreign subsidiaries,
with $5.3 million of that amount being held in U.S. bank accounts and denominated in U.S. dollars.
We believe that these balances could be repatriated for general corporate use without material
withholdings. As of June 30, 2009, $87.8 million of borrowings and $53.6 million of letters of
credit were outstanding under our revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2009, we had $230.3
million of availability under our revolving credit facility.
We are monitoring the ongoing economic environment and impact on the financial and capital
markets and remain focused on our liquidity, capital spending and access to capital, as well as the
financial condition of our clients, suppliers, and the financial institutions that participate in
our Senior Secured Credit Facility. While management continues to anticipate that the next twelve
months will continue to be a period of lower demand and prices for our services, we believe that
our operating cash flow, cash on hand and available borrowings, coupled with our ability to control
our capital expenditures, will be sufficient to maintain adequate liquidity throughout the next
twelve months. See also the discussions under Debt Service and Debt Compliance below.
Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we generated cash flows from operating activities
of approximately $157.3 million, compared to $162.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
These operating cash inflows primarily relate to the collection of accounts receivable, partially
offset by our operating loss for the period, as well as by cash paid against accounts payable and
other liabilities.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately $63.4 million and $131.3 million for six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Investing cash flows during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of our capital expenditures, which were financed through cash on
hand and cash generated by our operations.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately $106.1 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and $44.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Financing cash flows
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of the repayment of $100.0 million on
the outstanding principal balance of our revolving credit facility, which was paid through the use
of existing cash on hand and cash generated by our operations during the period.
35
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
157,299 |
|
|
$ |
162,084 |
|
Cash paid for capital expenditures |
|
|
(67,409 |
) |
|
|
(71,371 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,619 |
) |
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(6,107 |
) |
|
|
(5,936 |
) |
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(95,879 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(13,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Service
At June 30, 2009, our annual debt maturities for our Senior Notes (defined below), borrowings
under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, notes payable to related parties and other indebtedness
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Payments |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
16,523 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
89,812 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments |
|
|
535,335 |
|
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we are required to make principal payments totaling $14.5
million, plus accrued interest, related to the Moncla Notes (defined
below). These payments represent a lump sum
repayment of one Moncla Note totaling $12.5 million and a $2.0 million annual installment payment
on the second Moncla Note. We expect to fund our obligations under the Moncla Notes through cash on
hand generated by operating activities or borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Additionally, interest on our Senior Notes is due on June 1 and December 1 of each year. Interest
on the Senior Notes due December 1, 2009 will be approximately $17.8 million. We expect to fund
interest payments from cash generated by operations.
8.375% Senior Notes
On November 29, 2007, we issued $425.0 million of 8.375% senior notes (the Senior Notes)
under an Indenture (the Indenture). The Senior Notes were priced at 100% of their face value to
yield 8.375%. Net proceeds, after deducting initial purchasers fees and offering expenses, were
approximately $416.1 million. The Notes were registered as public debt effective August 22, 2008.
The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Accordingly, they
rank effectively subordinate to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness. The Senior
Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our existing
and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on June 1 and December 1
of each year. The Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2014.
On or after December 1, 2011, the Senior Notes will be subject to redemption at any time and
from time to time at our option, in whole or in part, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days
notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) set
forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the applicable
redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on December 1 of the
years indicated below:
36
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage |
2011 |
|
|
104.19 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
102.09 |
% |
2013 |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time and from time to time before December 1, 2010, we
may, on any one or more occasions, redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
outstanding Senior Notes at a redemption price of 108.375% of the principal amount thereof, plus
accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of any one
or more equity offerings; provided that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Senior Notes issued under the indenture remains outstanding immediately after each such redemption;
and provided, further, that each such redemption shall occur within 180 days of the date of the
closing of such equity offering.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to December 1, 2011, we may, at our
option, redeem all or a portion of the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium (as defined in the Indenture) with respect to
the Senior Notes and plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date. If we
experience a change of control, subject to certain exceptions, we must give holders of the Senior
Notes the opportunity to sell to us their Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon
to the date of purchase.
We are subject to certain negative covenants under the Indenture governing the Senior Notes.
The Indenture limits our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
create certain liens; |
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from our subsidiaries to us; |
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; |
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; and |
|
|
|
|
create unrestricted subsidiaries. |
These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications, and contain
cross-default provisions in connection with the covenants of our Senior Secured Credit Facility. In
addition, substantially all of the covenants will terminate before the Senior Notes mature if one
of two specified ratings agencies assigns the Senior Notes an investment grade rating in the future
and no events of default exist under the Indenture. Any covenants that cease to apply to us as a
result of achieving an investment grade rating will not be restored, even if the credit rating
assigned to the Senior Notes later falls below an investment grade rating.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
Simultaneously with the closing of the offering of the Senior Notes, the Company entered into
a credit agreement with several lenders that provides for a senior secured credit facility (the
Senior Secured Credit Facility) consisting of a revolving credit facility, letter of credit
sub-facility and swing line facility of up to an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, all
of which will mature no later than November 29, 2012. All obligations under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility are guaranteed by most of our subsidiaries and are secured by most of our assets,
including our accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. The Senior Secured Credit Facility and
the obligations thereunder are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and are or
will be guaranteed by certain of the Companys existing and future domestic subsidiaries. The
Senior Secured Credit Facility replaced the Companys previous senior credit facility, which was
terminated in connection with the closing of the offering of the Senior Notes.
37
The interest rate per annum applicable to amounts borrowed under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility are, at the Companys option, (i) LIBOR plus the applicable margin or (ii) the higher of
(x) Bank of Americas prime rate and (y) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, plus the applicable
margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR loans ranges from 150 to 200 basis points, and the
applicable margin for all other loans ranges from 50 to 100 basis points, both of which depend upon
the Companys consolidated leverage ratio. The one-month LIBOR rate at June 30, 2009 was 0.31% and
our borrowing rate was 175 basis points over LIBOR.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, which, among other
things, require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and limit the Companys capital
expenditures to $250.0 million per fiscal year, up to 50% of which amount may be carried over for
expenditure in the following fiscal year.
As calculated pursuant to the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to
maintain a ratio of trailing four quarters earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0. At June 30, 2009, the
calculated consolidated interest coverage ratio was 8.65 to 1.0.
As calculated pursuant to the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to
maintain a ratio of total debt to trailing four quarters EBITDA of no greater than 3.5 to 1.0. At
June 30, 2009, the calculated consolidated leverage ratio was 1.56 to 1.0. With total qualifying
debt of $554.3 million at June 30, 2009, this covenant requires that our trailing four quarters
EBITDA meet a minimum threshold of $158.4 million. Prior to the first quarter of 2009, we included
outstanding letters of credit (currently $53.6 million) with funded debt when calculating this
ratio. In early 2009 it was determined that outstanding letters of credit are not defined as funded
indebtedness under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, and therefore they have been excluded from
this calculation. See also the discussion under Debt Compliance below.
In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facility contains certain affirmative and negative
covenants, including, without limitation, restrictions on (i) liens; (ii) debt, guarantees and
other contingent obligations; (iii) mergers and consolidations; (iv) sales, transfers and other
dispositions of property or assets; (v) loans, acquisitions, joint ventures and other investments
(with acquisitions permitted so long as, after giving pro forma effect thereto, no default or event
of default exists under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the consolidated leverage ratio does
not exceed 2.75 to 1.00, the Company is in compliance with the consolidated interest coverage ratio
and the Company has at least $25 million of availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facility);
(vi) dividends and other distributions to, and redemptions and repurchases from, equity holders;
(vii) prepaying, redeeming or repurchasing subordinated (contractually or structurally) debt;
(viii) granting negative pledges other than to the lenders; (ix) changes in the nature of the
Companys business; (x) amending organizational documents, or amending or otherwise modifying any
debt, any related document or any other material agreement if such amendment or modification would
have a material adverse effect; and (xi) changes in accounting policies or reporting practices; in
each of the foregoing cases, with certain exceptions. The Senior Secured Credit Facility also
contains cross-default provisions in connection with the covenants of the Senior Notes. Further,
the Senior Secured Credit Facility permits share repurchases up to $200.0 million and provides that
share repurchases in excess of $200.0 million can be made only if our debt to capitalization ratio
is below 50%.
The Company may prepay the Senior Secured Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time
without premium or penalty, subject to certain reimbursements to the lenders for breakage and
redeployment costs.
On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lehman) filed for bankruptcy
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A subsidiary of Lehman, Lehman
Commercial Paper, Inc. (LCPI), was a member of the syndicate of banks participating in our Senior
Secured Credit Facility. LCPIs commitment was approximately 11% of the Companys total facility.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $230.3 million available under its Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This availability does not include approximately $28.3 million of unfunded
commitments by LCPI. The Company also had $53.6 million in committed letters of credit under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, committed
letters of credit count against the Companys borrowing capacity.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company paid $100.0 million against the
outstanding principal balance of the revolving portion of the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Moncla Notes Payable
In connection with the acquisition of Moncla Well Service, Inc. and related entities
(collectively, Moncla), we
38
entered into two notes payable with its former owners (each, a Moncla Note and,
collectively, the Moncla Notes). The first Moncla Note is an unsecured note in the amount of
$12.5 million, which is due and payable in a lump-sum, together with accrued interest, on October
25, 2009. The second Moncla Note is an unsecured note in the amount of $10.0 million and is
payable in annual installments of $2.0 million, plus accrued interest, beginning October 25, 2008
through 2012. Each of the Moncla Notes bears interest at the Federal Funds Rate adjusted annually
on the anniversary of the closing date of the Moncla acquisition.
Capital Lease Agreements
We lease equipment, such as vehicles, tractors, trailers, frac tanks and forklifts, from
financial institutions under master lease agreements. As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately
$19.1 million outstanding under such equipment leases.
Debt Compliance
At June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all the covenants under our Senior Notes
and the Senior Secured Credit Facility. If activity levels and pricing levels for the remainder of
2009 remain consistent with those of the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we believe that we can
maintain compliance with these covenants by taking additional cost reduction measures. However, if
our activity levels and pricing levels continue to deteriorate further, our earnings may not be
sufficient to maintain compliance with these covenants, even with additional cost reduction
efforts. If we anticipate that our earnings will fall below the required threshold, we may use our
existing cash to reduce our debt levels to maintain compliance. If we anticipate we will be unable
to maintain compliance, we will pursue alternatives, including discussions with our lenders to
amend these covenants. In the event that we do not meet our financial covenants and we are
unsuccessful in remedying the non-compliance, a breach of any of these covenants
could result in a default under our indebtedness. See Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior Notes contain numerous covenants that govern our
ability to make domestic and international investments and to repurchase our stock. Even if we
experience a more severe downturn in our business, we believe that the covenants related to our
capital spending and our investments in our foreign subsidiaries are within our control. Therefore,
we believe we can avoid a default of these covenants.
Although continued deterioration of market conditions could lead to a downgrade in the credit
ratings of companies in our industry, a downgrade of Keys credit rating would not have an effect
on our outstanding debt under either the Senior Secured Credit Facility or the Senior Notes, but
would potentially impact our ability to obtain additional external financing, if it was required.
Capital Expenditures
During 2009, management plans to continue to invest in our business through capital
expenditures, albeit at levels lower than in prior years. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, we incurred $67.4 million of capital expenditures, mostly related to the expansion of our
operations in Mexico, drill strings and nitrogen units for our rental operations, and capitalized
costs for new information systems projects. Our capital expenditure program for 2009 is expected
to total approximately $125.0 million. However, our capital expenditure program is subject to
market conditions, including activity levels, commodity prices and
industry capacity. Our focus for
the remainder of 2009 will be maximizing the utilization of our
current equipment and additional capital expenditures for
international expansion in Russia and Mexico. However, we may
seek to further increase our 2009 capital expenditure budget in the event of
new international expansion
opportunities. We currently plan to fund these expenditures through a combination of cash
on hand, operating cash flows and borrowings under our Senior Secured
Credit Facility. However, should our
operating cash flows prove to be insufficient, management may adjust capital spending plans accordingly. We may also incur capital expenditures for
strategic investments and acquisitions.
Geostream Investment
On October 31, 2008, we acquired a 26% interest in Geostream for $17.4 million. Geostream is
based in the Russian Federation and provides drilling and workover services and sub-surface
engineering and modeling in the Russian Federation. Under the Geostream agreement, as amended, we
are required to purchase an additional 24% of Geostream no later than September 1, 2009 for
approximately 11.3 million (which at June 30, 2009 was equivalent to approximately $15.9 million).
The final terms of the additional investment, including the specific structure and form of the
purchase consideration, are being finalized among the parties and will be disclosed after the
closing of the second investment. In addition, following the purchase of the additional 24%, the Company will have majority
representation on Geostreams board
39
of
directors and a controlling interest. We will be required to
consolidate Geostreams financial results subsequent to the
purchase of the additional 24%. For a period not to
exceed six years subsequent to October 31, 2008, we have the option to increase our ownership
percentage of Geostream to 100%. However, if we have not acquired 100% of Geostream on or before
the end of the six-year period, we will be required to arrange an initial public offering for those
shares. We expect to satisfy our obligation to Geostream through cash on hand generated by our
operations or borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2009, we did not, and we currently do not, have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates in Item 1. Financial Statements
above for a discussion of the new accounting pronouncements adopted in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is based on our condensed consolidated unaudited financial
statements, contained elsewhere herein. The preparation of these financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires that we make estimates. There have been no material changes in the
development of our accounting estimates or the assumptions underlying those estimates, or the
accounting policies that we disclosed as our Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
market risk from those disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. More detailed information
concerning market risk can be found in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management
performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer,
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designated to ensure
that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that due to the identification of a material
weakness in our payroll process as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and discussed below, as of June 30, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures remained ineffective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In February 2009, we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, in which we described ineffective control activities surrounding our payroll process that
constituted a material weakness in our system of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. Specifically, these control activities pertained to documentation and approvals
of employee master file data, proper evidence concerning approval of hours worked or rate changes
and deficiencies with reconciliations where payroll data was a major component. In 2008, we worked
to improve our payroll process including data quality and internal controls. During the middle of
2008, we began to relocate the payroll function from a shared services location in Midland, Texas
to our corporate offices in Houston, Texas. During this transition, the payroll department lost a significant percentage of its staff, which required their replacement
with new personnel. We also
40
increased the overall size of the payroll department upon its
relocation to Houston. With this change, we also added new payroll practices and procedures.
Additionally, throughout 2008, we worked on the replacement of our existing payroll system with a
new human resource information system, which included a payroll system that was initiated in late
2007. However, due to the nature and functionality of the payroll system that was in place during
2008, our conversion to the new system was delayed until January 2009. The implementation of the
new human resource information system in January 2009 allows for automated workflow and approval of
information, including, among other things, employee master file data, hours worked and rate
changes. We believe that as the new payroll department employees receive the proper training and
with the implementation of the new human resource and payroll system that was completed in January
2009, we will further strengthen our control structure, increase our efficiency in processing
payroll and provide transparency of payroll related data, allowing for the remediation of this
material weakness. We have begun our process for evaluating the operating effectiveness of these
controls during the second quarter of 2009 but have not yet completed this process. We anticipate
that this evaluation process will be largely completed in the fourth quarter of 2009. Until this
process is completed, we cannot conclude that this material weakness has been remediated.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except for the implementation of a new human resource information system described above,
there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We implemented a new close and
consolidation application in June 2009 but continued to perform the majority of controls following
our previously tested control structure. The resulting changes in our internal control over
financial reporting were evaluated and determined to not have materially affected our control
structure for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
41
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In addition to various suits and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business,
we continue to be involved in litigation with some of our former executive officers. We do not
believe that the disposition of any of these items, including litigation with former management,
will result in a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. For additional information on legal proceedings, see Note 9. Commitments
and Contingencies in Item 1. Financial Statements above.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in our risk factors disclosed in (i) our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated as of, and filed with the SEC on, February 27,
2009, and (ii) our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 dated as of,
and filed with the SEC on, May 8, 2009. For a discussion of these risk factors, see Item 1A. Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On May 12, 2009, in connection with the settlement of a lawsuit, the Company issued to two
individuals warrants to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. The warrants, which expire
on May 12, 2014, are exercisable for 174,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise
price of $4.56 per share. No proceeds were received by the Company upon the issuance of the
warrants, but the Company will receive the exercise price of any warrants that are exercised prior
to their expiration. The warrants, which are unregistered securities, were issued in a private
placement and, therefore, their issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933.
The table below summarizes the repurchases of our common stock in the second quarter of 2009:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares that may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid per Share (2) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
April 1, 2009 to
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
$ |
3.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009 to May
31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2009 to
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,267 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
17,982 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of
restricted stock awards. |
|
(2) |
|
The price paid per share on the vesting date with respect to the tax withholding repurchases
was determined using the closing price as quoted on the NYSE on the vesting date for awards
granted under the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2007 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan and the
previous business day for awards granted under the plan. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
42
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS
At our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 4, 2009 (the Annual Meeting),
holders of 112,621,788 shares were present in person or by proxy, constituting 91.21% of the
outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date for the Annual Meeting. The matters voted
upon at the annual meeting are described below.
Election of three Class III Directors
The stockholders elected the following three Class III Directors to serve for a three year
term, expiring in 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes cast in favor: |
|
Votes withheld: |
Richard J. Alario |
|
|
85,883,555 |
|
|
|
26,738,231 |
|
Ralph S. Michael, III |
|
|
83,003,633 |
|
|
|
29,618,153 |
|
Arlene M. Yocum |
|
|
85,832,843 |
|
|
|
26,788,943 |
|
Four Class I Directors, Lynn R. Coleman, Kevin P. Collins, W. Phillip Marcum and William F.
Owens, continued in office with terms expiring in 2010. Four Class II Directors, David J.
Breazzano, William D. Fertig, J. Robinson West and Robert K. Reeves, also continued in office with
terms expiring in 2011.
Adoption of 2009 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan
The stockholders adopted the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2009 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of 2009 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
Votes cast in favor |
|
|
93,001,409 |
|
Votes cast against |
|
|
4,719,878 |
|
Votes abstaining |
|
|
120,949 |
|
Broker non-votes |
|
|
14,779,552 |
|
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The stockholders ratified the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Plan |
|
|
|
|
Votes cast in favor |
|
|
111,079,469 |
|
Votes cast against |
|
|
1,508,673 |
|
Votes abstaining |
|
|
33,645 |
|
Broker non-votes |
|
|
0 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Restatement of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, File No.
001-08038.) |
|
3.2
|
|
Unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of Key Energy Services, Inc. dated January 11, 2000,
limiting the designation of the additional authorized shares to common stock. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
3.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2006, File No.
001-08038.) |
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2007,
File No. 001-08038.) |
43
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amendments to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted April 4,
2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on April 9, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
3.6
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted June 4,
2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on June 10, 2009, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors of the Company party thereto, and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial
purchasers named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.3
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 22, 2008, among Key Marine Services, LLC, the
existing guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2009, among Key Energy Mexico, LLC, the
existing Guarantors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Master Agreement, dated June 23, 2009 (fully executed on June 26, 2009), by and
among Key Energy Services, Inc., Key Energy Services Cyprus Ltd., OOO Geostream Assets Management
and L-Group. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed on July 1, 2009, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
10.2*
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims by and between Kevin P. Collins and Key Energy
Services, Inc. dated April 3, 2009. |
|
10.3*
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims by and between W. Phillip Marcum and Key Energy
Services, Inc. dated April 3, 2009. |
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any
director or any executive officer participates. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
44
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard J. Alario |
|
|
|
Richard J. Alario |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date: August 6, 2009
45
EXHIBITS INDEX
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Restatement of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, File No.
001-08038.) |
|
3.2
|
|
Unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of Key Energy Services, Inc. dated January 11, 2000,
limiting the designation of the additional authorized shares to common stock. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
3.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2006, File No.
001-08038.) |
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2007,
File No. 001-08038.) |
|
3.5
|
|
Amendments to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted April 4,
2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on April 9, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
3.6
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted June 4,
2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on June 10, 2009, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No.
001-08038.) |
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors of the Company party thereto, and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial
purchasers named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.3
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 22, 2008, among Key Marine Services, LLC, the
existing guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2009, among Key Energy Mexico, LLC, the
existing Guarantors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Master Agreement, dated June 23, 2009 (fully executed on June 26, 2009), by and
among Key Energy Services, Inc., Key Energy Services Cyprus Ltd., OOO Geostream Assets Management
and L-Group. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed on July 1, 2009, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
10.2*
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims by and between Kevin P. Collins and Key Energy
Services, Inc. dated April 3, 2009. |
|
10.3*
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims by and between W. Phillip Marcum and Key Energy
Services, Inc. dated April 3, 2009. |
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any
director or any executive officer participates. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |