FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 27, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
000-03905
|
|
16-0874418 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Commission
File Number:
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York
|
|
14624 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) (585) 352-7777
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, of the registrant outstanding as
of August 6, 2009 was 7,398,804.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
|
$ |
12,311 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
17,208 |
|
|
|
17,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold |
|
|
8,622 |
|
|
|
8,949 |
|
Cost of Services Sold |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold |
|
|
13,365 |
|
|
|
13,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense (Income) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other Expense, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense, net |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
381 |
|
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
7,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
7,399 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $88
and $75 as of June 27, 2009 and March 28, 2009, respectively |
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
Other Receivables |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
4,887 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
15,200 |
|
Property and Equipment, net |
|
|
4,157 |
|
|
|
4,174 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,923 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
Intangible Asset, net |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
28,090 |
|
|
$ |
29,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
5,031 |
|
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
6,720 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,662,752 and 7,656,358 shares issued as of June 27, 2009 and
March 28, 2009, respectively; 7,386,970 and 7,380,576 shares
outstanding as of June 27, 2009 and March 28, 2009, respectively |
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
8,823 |
|
|
|
8,606 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
6,853 |
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 275,782 shares as of
June 27, 2009 and March 28, 2009 |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
18,789 |
|
|
|
18,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
28,090 |
|
|
$ |
23,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
228 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
Payments on Other Debt Obligations |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Related to Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Income Taxes, net |
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value |
|
|
of Par |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance as of March 28, 2009 |
|
|
7,656 |
|
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
$ |
8,606 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
6,853 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
$ |
18,619 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Unrecognized Prior Service
Cost, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
$ |
3,831 |
|
|
$ |
8,823 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
6,764 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
$ |
18,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
NOTE 1 GENERAL
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc. (Transcat or the Company) is a leading global
distributor of professional grade test, measurement and calibration instruments and accredited
provider of calibration, parts inspection, production model engineering and repair services
primarily for the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated, industrial manufacturing, energy and utilities,
chemical process, and other industries.
Basis of Presentation: Transcats unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for
interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the Consolidated
Financial Statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been
included. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the fiscal year. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the fiscal year ended
March 28, 2009 (fiscal year 2009) contained in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat has determined the fair value of debt and other
financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
The carrying amount of debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to
variable interest rate pricing, and the carrying amounts for cash, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for all
equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair
market value of the award as of the grant date. The Company records compensation cost related to
unvested stock awards by recognizing, on a straight-line basis, the unamortized grant date fair
value over the remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of
stock awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity.
Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the
deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company did
not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. The Company estimates
forfeiture rates based on its historical experience. During the first quarter of the fiscal year
ending March 27, 2010 (fiscal year 2010), the Company recorded non-cash stock-based compensation
cost in the amount of $0.2 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive
(Loss) Income.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions: The accounts of Transmation (Canada) Inc., the
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, are maintained in the local currency and have been translated to
U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities have been translated at
the period-end rates of exchange and related revenue and expense accounts have been translated at
average rates of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising from translation of
Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance sheets into U.S. dollars are recorded directly to the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian business transactions. The net
foreign currency loss was less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and
2009. The Company utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that future
earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company does not
apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled
less than $0.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, was recognized as a
component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss)
Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the
underlying accounts receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On June 27, 2009,
the Company had a foreign exchange forward contract, set to mature in July 2009, outstanding in the
notional amount of $0.2 million. A gain on the outstanding contract, totaling less than $0.1
million, was included in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 27,
2009. The Company does not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
of common stock reflect the assumed conversion of stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted
stock awards using the treasury stock method in periods in which they have a dilutive effect. In
computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which would have been
7
received from the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock and the related tax
benefits are considered to have been used to purchase shares of common stock at the average market
prices during the period, and the resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in
the calculation of average shares of common stock outstanding.
The average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Average Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
7,186 |
|
Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
7,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive Common Stock Equivalents |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to Transcats net loss in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, 0.2
million shares of dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the
computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive. |
On March 29, 2009, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (EITF 03-6-1). EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and therefore, need
to be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method as described in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. The adoption of
EITF 03-6-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent
Events (SFAS 165). This statement establishes general standards of accounting and disclosures of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. It is effective for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall
be applied prospectively. The Company has evaluated events and transactions that occurred between
June 28, 2009 and August 7, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, for possible
disclosure and recognition in the financial statements. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have an
effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Financial Statement of Position (FSP) No. 107-1 and Accounting
Principles Board (APB) No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP 107-1). FSP 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 also
amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized
financial information at interim reporting periods. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009. FSP 107-1 does not require disclosures for earlier periods
presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, FSP
107-1 requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. The
Companys adoption of FSP 107-1 did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS 168). This statement establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have a
material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 DEBT
Description. Transcat, through a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. maturing in August 2011, has a revolving credit facility in the amount of $15 million
(the Revolving Credit Facility). As of June 27, 2009, $13.2 million was available under the
Credit Agreement, subject to the maximum borrowing restriction based on a 2.75 multiple of earnings
before income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the preceding four consecutive fiscal
quarters, of which $2.2 million was outstanding and included in long-term debt on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
Interest and Commitment Fees. Interest on the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of prime, a three month certificate of
deposit plus 1%, or the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%) (the
8
Base Rate) or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case, plus a margin.
Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of unused credit available on the
Revolving Credit Facility. Interest and commitment fees are adjusted on a quarterly basis based
upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Base Rate
and the LIBOR rates as of June 27, 2009 were 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively. The Companys interest
rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 ranged from 1.2% to 2.8%.
Covenants. The Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply,
including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant. The Company was in
compliance with all loan covenants and requirements throughout the first quarter of fiscal year
2010.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property and
the common stock of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Transmation (Canada) Inc. and Westcon, Inc.
(Westcon), as collateral security for the loans made under the Revolving Credit Facility.
NOTE 3 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended (the 2003 Plan), provides for, among other
awards, grants of restricted stock and stock options to directors, officers and key employees to
purchase common stock at no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. In addition,
Transcat maintains a warrant plan for directors (the Directors Warrant Plan). At June 27, 2009,
the number of shares available for future grant under the 2003 Plan totaled 0.2 million.
Restricted Stock: During the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, the Company granted
performance-based restricted stock awards in place of options as a primary component of executive
compensation. The performance-based restricted stock awards will vest after three years subject to
certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible three-year period.
Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted awards will equal
the grant date fair market value of the award that coincides with the actual outcome of the
performance conditions. On an interim basis, the Company records compensation cost based on an
assessment of the probability of achieving the performance conditions. At June 27, 2009, the
Company estimated the probability of achievement for the performance-based awards granted in fiscal
years 2010 and 2009 to be 100% and 50%, respectively, of the target levels. During the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010, total expense relating to performance-based restricted stock awards,
based on grant date fair value and the estimated probability of achievement, was less than $0.1
million. Unearned compensation totaled $0.8 million as of June 27, 2009.
Stock Options: Options vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or
on a straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to
options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire
award.
The following table summarizes options as of and for the first three months ended June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 28, 2009 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised/Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the
difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options)
that would have been received by the option holders had all holders exercised their options on June
27, 2009. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys stock. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as
of June 27, 2009 was $0.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2 years.
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant Plan, as amended, warrants have been granted to
non-employee directors to purchase common stock at the fair market value at the date of grant.
Warrants vest over a three year period and expire in five years from the date of grant. All
warrants authorized for issuance pursuant to the Directors Warrant Plan have been granted.
9
Warrants outstanding on June 27, 2009 continue to vest and be exercisable in accordance with the
terms of the Directors Warrant Plan.
The following table summarizes warrants as of and for the first three months ended June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 28, 2009 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised/Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the
difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money warrants) that
would have been received by the warrant holders had all holders exercised their warrants on June
27, 2009. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys stock.
NOTE 4 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment
information for the first quarter ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
|
$ |
12,311 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
17,208 |
|
|
|
17,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product (1) |
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
Service (1) |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense, net |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on actual amounts, a percentage of
revenues, headcount, and managements estimates. |
10
NOTE 5 ACQUISITION
On August 14, 2008, Transcat acquired Westcon. At closing, Transcat and the sole shareholder of
Westcon entered into an earn out agreement. This agreement provides that the sole shareholder may
be entitled to certain contingent earn out payments subject to continued employment and
achieving certain post-closing gross profit and revenue targets. During the first quarter of fiscal year
2010, payments totaling less than $0.1 million were earned and recorded as compensation expense in
the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income.
The results of operations of Westcon are included in Transcats consolidated operating results as
of the date the business was acquired. The following unaudited pro forma results assume the
acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period presented. The pro forma results do not
purport to represent what the Companys results of operations actually would have been if the
transactions set forth had occurred on the date indicated or what the Companys results of
operations will be in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
2008 |
Net Revenue |
|
$ |
19,899 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
93 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements. This report and, in particular, the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These include statements concerning expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (Transcat, we, us, or our). Words
such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results
and outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking
statements. When considering these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should keep in mind
the cautionary statements elsewhere in this report and in any documents incorporated herein by
reference. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time and we cannot predict those events
or how they may affect us. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may
affect Transcats operating and financial results and its ability to achieve its financial
objectives, interested parties should review the Risk Factors sections in Transcats reports
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 28, 2009. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and
returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts
receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not
appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed,
the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is
calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe.
The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenues
and/or the historical rate of returns.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure the cost of services received in exchange for all equity
awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair market
value of the award as of the grant date. We record compensation cost related to unvested stock
awards by recognizing, on a straight-line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the
remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards are
presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax
benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred
tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. We did not capitalize
any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our
historical experience.
Options vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or on a
straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to options
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
During the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, we granted performance-based restricted
stock awards in place of options as a primary component of executive compensation. The
performance-based restricted stock awards will vest after three years subject to certain cumulative
diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible three-year period. Compensation cost
ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted awards will equal the grant date fair
market value of the award that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance conditions. On
an interim basis, we record compensation cost based on an assessment of the probability of
achieving the performance conditions. At June 27, 2009, we estimated the probability of
achievement for the performance-based awards granted in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 to be 100% and
50%, respectively, of the target levels.
Revenue Recognition. Product sales are recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfer
to the customer. We recognize the majority of our service revenue based upon when the calibration
or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some of our
service revenue is generated from managing customers calibration programs in which we recognize
revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. We generally invoice our customers for freight,
shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the
related revenues are recorded based upon historical data.
12
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, the components
of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Gross Profit Percentage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
Service Gross Profit |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
Total Gross Profit |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
Service Revenue |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Total Other Expense, net |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 2009 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
|
$ |
12,311 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,208 |
|
|
$ |
17,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue decreased $0.6 million or 3.6% from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Our product net sales accounted for 65.5% of our total net revenue in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010 and 69.0% of our total net revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. For the
first quarter of fiscal year 2010, product sales decreased $1.0 million or 8.5% compared to the
first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We believe this decline is reflective of current economic
conditions. While we transacted with 2.2% more customers in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, our average product sales per customer
declined by 9.8%. Our fiscal years 2010 and 2009 product sales growth in relation to prior fiscal
year quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales (Decline) Growth |
|
|
(8.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Our average product sales per business day decreased to $176 in the first quarter of fiscal year
2010, compared with $192 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Our product sales per business
day for each fiscal quarter during fiscal years 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Per Business Day |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, sales through our direct distribution channel decreased
10.0% from the same period in the prior fiscal year. Direct sales to U.S., International and
Canadian markets all declined as a result of the current economic climate, but were partially
offset by sales to wind energy industry customers. Wind energy product sales represented 10.6% of
our total product net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. While sales through our
direct distribution channel declined, our reseller channel had comparable sales
quarter-over-quarter for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009. With declining direct
sales and comparable reseller sales, the mix of reseller sales as a percent of our total product
net sales increased 140 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010. The following table presents the percent of net sales for the
significant product distribution channels for each fiscal quarter during fiscal years 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Percent of Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
|
83.0 |
% |
|
|
79.7 |
% |
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
Reseller |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
Freight Billed to Customer |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer product orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our inventory,
customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be
calibrated in our calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, orders awaiting credit approval and orders required to be shipped at a future date. Our
total pending product shipments for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 increased 5.8% from the
first quarter of fiscal year 2009. This increase was primarily driven by orders required to be
shipped complete associated with our wind energy business, partially offset by a reduction in
products awaiting calibration prior to shipment. The following table presents the percentage of
total
14
pending product shipments that are backorders at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
and our historical trend of total pending product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Total Pending Product Shipments |
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
% of Pending Product Shipments
that are Backorders |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
|
81.0 |
% |
|
|
84.1 |
% |
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
|
74.7 |
% |
Service revenue increased $0.4 million, or 7.2%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the
first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Within any year, while we add new customers, we also have
customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors. Among
those factors are variations in the timing of customer periodic calibrations on instruments and
other services, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing decisions. Because the
timing of calibration orders and segment expenses can vary on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we
believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a better indication of the progress of this segment.
Service segment revenue for the twelve months ended June 27, 2009 were $24.3 million, up 4.9% when
compared with $23.2 million for the twelve months ended June 28, 2008. Our fiscal years 2010 and
2009 service revenue growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Revenue Growth (Decline) |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it costly
and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment and
uniquely-trained personnel necessary to perform all measurement disciplines with in-house
calibration capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in the core electrical,
temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines. Accordingly, 15% to 20% of our service segment
revenue is generated from outsourcing customer equipment to third party vendors for calibration
beyond our chosen scope of capabilities. The following table presents the source of our service
segment revenue and the percent of service segment revenue for the first quarter of fiscal years
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 First Quarter |
|
|
|
FY 2009 First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Depot/On-Site |
|
$ |
4,710 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
% |
|
|
$ |
4,478 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
% |
Outsourced |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
Freight Billed to
Customers |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,940 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,362 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
$ |
4,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit dollars in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 declined $0.7 million, or
15.1%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of total net revenue, total
gross profit declined 300 basis points over the same time period.
We evaluate product gross profit from two perspectives. Channel gross profit includes net sales
less the direct cost of inventory sold. Our total product gross profit includes channel gross
profit as well as the impact of vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to
customers, freight expenses and direct shipping costs. In general, our total product gross profit
can vary based upon price discounting; the mix of sales to our
reseller channel, which have lower
margins than our direct customer base; and the timing of periodic vendor rebates and cooperative
advertising income received from suppliers.
15
The channel gross profit percentage in our direct distribution channel declined 140 basis points
from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as we increased
discounting in efforts to maintain competitive pricing in the current economic environment. Within
the reseller channel, we maintained a relatively consistent quarter-over-quarter channel gross
profit percentage as a result of our continued use of a volume-based pricing structure.
Total product gross profit in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 was 23.5% of total product
sales and declined 380 basis points when compared with 27.3% of total product sales in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Product gross profit declined $0.7 million in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, which was the result of reduced
volume, increased price discounting and lower vendor point-of-sale rebates. Vendor point-of-sale
rebates are based on year-over-year growth in product segment sales. We did not qualify for this
type of rebate in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009,
point-of-sale rebates were $0.1 million. The following table reflects the quarterly historical
trend of our product gross profit as a percent of total product sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Channel Gross Profit % Direct (1) |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
Channel Gross Profit % Reseller (1) |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channel Gross Profit % Combined (2) |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Other Items % (3) |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Gross Profit % |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Channel gross profit % calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net
sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents aggregate gross profit % for direct and reseller channels, calculated as net sales
less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight
expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration service gross profit dollars increased 2.9% from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009
to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. As a percent of service revenue, calibration service
gross profit decreased 80 basis points over the same time period. We realized a
quarter-over-quarter increase in cost of calibration services sold of 8.3% in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, which was primarily the result
of costs associated with adding a lab in Portland, Oregon. The following table reflects our
calibration services gross profit growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Gross Profit
Dollar Growth (Decline) |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse |
|
$ |
2,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,959 |
|
|
$ |
4,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 4.3%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to
the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Sales, Marketing and Warehouse expenses as a percent of
total revenue increased slightly from 14.5% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to 14.9% in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The increase is primarily driven by incremental costs
associated with adding Westcon selling and warehouse personnel, partially offset by reduced
spending on selling and marketing initiatives. Administrative expenses as a percent of total
revenue decreased from 8.6% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to 8.1% in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010 primarily due to a reduction in performance-based management bonus and employee
profit sharing expense.
16
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
153 |
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we realized a $0.1 million benefit from income taxes,
compared with a $0.2 million provision for income taxes in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
We continue to evaluate our tax provision on a quarterly basis and make adjustments, as deemed
necessary, to our effective tax rate given changes in facts and circumstances expected for the
entire fiscal year.
17
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that amounts available under our current credit facility and our cash on hand are
sufficient to satisfy our expected working capital and capital expenditure needs as well as our
lease commitments for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash Provided by (Used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010 was $1.5 million compared to the $0.4 million of cash provided by operating activities in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Significant working capital fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
Inventory/Accounts Payable: Due to recent recessionary economic conditions, we have
implemented tight monitoring controls to drive down inventory levels. These efforts
provided approximately $0.6 million of cash from operations in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010 compared to cash used of approximately $1.1 million in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009. In general, our accounts payable balance increases or
decreases as a result of timing of vendor payments for inventory receipts. |
|
|
|
|
Receivables: We continue to generate positive operating cash flows and maintain
strong collections on our accounts receivable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
June 28, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months |
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
$ |
12,317 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
$ |
8,116 |
|
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities: During the first quarter of fiscal year
2010, we used $0.2 million in cash to pay accrued compensation and other liabilities
compared with $1.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. This decline was
primarily attributable to lower payments for employee profit sharing and
performance-based management bonuses. |
Investing Activities: The $0.3 million of cash used in investing activities in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010, an increase of approximately $0.1 million when compared to the first quarter
of fiscal year 2009, was primarily for expansion of capabilities in our calibration laboratories
and equipment replacement.
Financing Activities: During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we used approximately $1.3
million in cash from operations to reduce our debt, compared to $0.3 million used in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
OUTLOOK
We believe that our next two fiscal quarters will continue to be soft and anticipate some recovery
in our fiscal fourth quarter. Our strong balance sheet and cash flow have positioned us to take
advantage of opportunities that may present themselves, as we prudently seek appropriate
acquisition candidates to further grow our service segment. We expect product sales to wind energy
customers to continue to grow at a faster rate than product sales to customers in other industries
for the rest of fiscal year 2010.
Most critical in our decision making is our commitment to our longer-term strategy where we believe
the investments in our sales team, calibration technicians and support staff are fundamental in
achieving our growth objectives.
18
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. In the event
interest rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less
than $0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained constant. As of June 27, 2009,
$13.2 million was available under our credit facility, subject to the maximum borrowing restriction
based on a 2.75 multiple of earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the
preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters, of which $2.2 million was outstanding.
Under our credit facility described in Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements, interest is
adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. We mitigate our interest
rate risk by electing the lower of the base rate available under the credit facility and the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As of June 27, 2009, the base rate and the LIBOR rate were 3.3%
and 0.3%, respectively. Our interest rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 ranged from
1.2% to 2.8%. On June 27, 2009, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to
upward movements in interest rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Over 90% of our net revenue for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009 were denominated in
U.S. dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the value of the
Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would impact our net revenue by less than 1%. We monitor the
relationship between the U.S. and Canadian currencies on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices
for products and services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate.
We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that future earnings would be
adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. We do not apply hedge accounting and
therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled less than $0.1 million
during the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, was recognized as a component of other
expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income. The change
in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying accounts
receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On June 27, 2009, we had a foreign
exchange forward contract, set to mature in July 2009, outstanding in the notional amount of $0.2
million. A gain on the outstanding contract, totaling less than $0.1 million, was included in
other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 27, 2009. We do not use
hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal
financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such
date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by
this quarterly report (our first fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index to Exhibits.
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ Charles P. Hadded
|
|
|
Charles P. Hadeed |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ John J. Zimmer
|
|
|
John J. Zimmer |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|
20
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(3) |
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
3.2 |
|
Code of Regulations, as amended through May 4, 2009, are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2009. |
|
10.1 |
|
Transcat, Inc. 2009 Insider Stock Sales Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.28
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009. |
(31) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(32) |
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
21