e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 1-14771
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2962824 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10 M Commerce Way, Woburn, MA 01801
(Address of principal executive offices)
(781) 994-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (check one).
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As of October 31, 2009, 14,174,326 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
5,047 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Net investment in leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due in installments |
|
|
169,934 |
|
|
|
142,881 |
|
Estimated residual value |
|
|
18,216 |
|
|
|
15,257 |
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance lease payments and deposits |
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
|
(982 |
) |
Unearned income |
|
|
(55,071 |
) |
|
|
(49,384 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(13,876 |
) |
|
|
(11,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
118,647 |
|
|
|
97,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in service contracts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Investment in rental contracts, net |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
122,061 |
|
|
$ |
104,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
47,207 |
|
|
$ |
33,325 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
55,928 |
|
|
|
40,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
14,173,076 and 14,038,257 shares issued at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
46,170 |
|
|
|
45,774 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
19,821 |
|
|
|
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
66,133 |
|
|
|
64,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
122,061 |
|
|
$ |
104,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
$ |
6,030 |
|
|
$ |
21,522 |
|
|
$ |
16,566 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
|
|
7,566 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
Service fees and other |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
11,970 |
|
|
|
10,085 |
|
|
|
33,956 |
|
|
|
28,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
9,697 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
15,883 |
|
|
|
10,199 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
Interest |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
9,977 |
|
|
|
7,597 |
|
|
|
29,382 |
|
|
|
21,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,583 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,170,079 |
|
|
|
14,016,167 |
|
|
|
14,138,374 |
|
|
|
13,992,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,328,613 |
|
|
|
14,179,080 |
|
|
|
14,242,420 |
|
|
|
14,174,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
4
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
13,960,778 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
45,412 |
|
|
$ |
15,276 |
|
|
$ |
60,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercises |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
53,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Common stock dividends ($0.20 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,038,257 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
45,774 |
|
|
$ |
18,424 |
|
|
$ |
64,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
131,069 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Common stock dividends ($0.10 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
14,173,076 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
46,170 |
|
|
$ |
19,821 |
|
|
$ |
66,133 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
5
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers |
|
$ |
55,433 |
|
|
$ |
43,185 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(11,530 |
) |
|
|
(10,928 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
Interest received |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,924 |
|
|
|
31,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lease and rental contracts |
|
|
(56,749 |
) |
|
|
(50,569 |
) |
Investment in direct costs |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(57,985 |
) |
|
|
(51,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured debt |
|
|
66,487 |
|
|
|
71,176 |
|
Repayment of secured debt |
|
|
(52,605 |
) |
|
|
(36,642 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
339 |
|
Proceeds from capital lease obligation |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(2,118 |
) |
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
32,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,507 |
) |
|
|
12,611 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
19,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs |
|
|
(21,522 |
) |
|
|
(16,566 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
15,883 |
|
|
|
10,199 |
|
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value |
|
|
40,968 |
|
|
|
29,297 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
2,461 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
41,924 |
|
|
$ |
31,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
6
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
A. Nature of Business
MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as MicroFinancial, we, us or our) operates
primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corporation.
TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents microticket
equipment and provides other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment
through 2008 and year to date 2009 was approximately $5,500 while Leasecomm historically financed
contracts of approximately $1,900. We primarily source our originations through a nationwide
network of independent equipment vendors, sales organizations, brokers and other dealer-based
origination networks. We fund our operations through cash provided by operating activities and
borrowings under our revolving line of credit.
B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements.
Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required
for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
full year ending December 31, 2009.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size of
each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual
transactions. Rather, we have developed a sophisticated, risk-adjusted pricing model and have
automated the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper
risk-adjusted pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have
priced appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we
experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically
review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making
appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size
of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose of developing and
determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our portfolio are not
re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to
specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a
general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an
assessment of current credit risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.
We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the
likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon
a combination of the lessees bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current
delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant
factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool
analyses of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant
factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical
experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in
7
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the
adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. We take charge-offs against our receivables when such
receivables are deemed uncollectible. In general a receivable is deemed uncollectible when it is
360 days past due where no contact has been made with the lessee for 12 months or, if earlier, when
other adverse events occur with respect to an account. Historically, the typical monthly payment
under our microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees will
pay past due amounts later in the process because of the small amount necessary to bring an account
current.
A summary of the activity in our allowance for credit losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for credit losses, beginning |
|
$ |
11,722 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
15,883 |
|
|
|
10,199 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(16,871 |
) |
|
|
(8,869 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses, ending |
|
$ |
13,876 |
|
|
$ |
10,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net
income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on
net income per common share. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, 849,305 options were
excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was
antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, 1,108,028 options were excluded from
the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 1,292,067 options were excluded from the
computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,583 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
14,170,079 |
|
|
|
14,016,167 |
|
|
|
14,138,374 |
|
|
|
13,992,951 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
options, warrants and restricted stock |
|
|
158,534 |
|
|
|
162,913 |
|
|
|
104,046 |
|
|
|
181,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of net income
per common share diluted |
|
|
14,328,613 |
|
|
|
14,179,080 |
|
|
|
14,242,420 |
|
|
|
14,174,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Employee Compensation
Under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for
issuance. In February 2009, under that plan, we granted 10 year options to our executive officers
to purchase 321,058 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.30 per share. The fair value
of these awards was $0.55 per share. The options were valued at the date of grant using the
following assumptions: expected life in years of 6.50, annualized
8
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
volatility of 55.54%, expected dividend yield of 8.70%, and a riskfree interest rate of
2.28%. The options vest over five years beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date. In
February 2008, under our 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, we granted 10 year options to our executive
officers to purchase 176,879 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.85 per share. The
fair value of these awards was $1.78 per share. The options were valued at the date of grant using
the following assumptions: expected life in years of 6.25, annualized volatility of 41.30%,
expected dividend yield of 3.70%, and a riskfree interest rate of 2.66%. The options vest over
five years beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, 400,000 options originally granted to members of the Board of Directors in
February 1999 expired. In addition, 105,097 options granted to the former VP of Sales were
forfeited upon his last date of employment in May 2009.
Directors Fritz von Mering and John Everets were appointed to the Board as non employee
directors on February 4, 2004, and August 15, 2006, respectively. In connection with their
appointments, each director was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock which vested 20% upon
grant and 5% on the first day of each quarter subsequent to the grant date. The restricted share
fair values were $3.17 per share for Mr. von Mering and $3.35 per share for Mr. Everets. The
compensation expense associated with the grants is recognized as vesting occurs. As of September
30, 2009, 5,000 restricted shares remain unvested under Mr. Everets grant.
Information relating to our outstanding stock options at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Value |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
282,000 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
282,000 |
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
31,923 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
142,382 |
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
258,723 |
|
|
|
9.42 |
|
|
|
303,000 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258,028 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
$ |
585,000 |
|
|
|
7.78 |
|
|
|
825,000 |
|
|
$ |
282,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the total share based employee
compensation cost recognized was $27,000 and $24,000, respectively. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the total share based employee compensation cost recognized was
$60,000 and $70,000, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
payable, and other liabilities, we believe that the carrying amount approximates fair value due to
their short-term nature. The fair value of the revolving line of credit is calculated based on the
incremental borrowing rates currently available on loans with similar terms and maturities. The
fair value of our revolving line of credit at September 30, 2009 approximates its carrying value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits with various commercial banks and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when acquired. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates market value.
9
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Concentration of Credit Risk
We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial
banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company maintains cash
deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.
C. Revolving line of credit
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a three-year $30 million revolving line of credit with
Sovereign Bank (Sovereign) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. On July 9, 2008, we
entered into an amended agreement to increase our revolving line of credit with Sovereign to $60
million. The maturity date of the amended agreement is August 2, 2010. Outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets and,
until February 2009, bore interest at Prime or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus
2.75%. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans.
If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan. On
February 10, 2009, we entered into an amended agreement to increase our revolving line of credit
with Sovereign to $85 million. Under the amended agreement, outstanding borrowings bear interest
at Prime plus 1.75% or LIBOR plus 3.75%, in each case subject to a minimum interest rate of 5%.
All other terms of the facility remained the same. At September 30, 2009 and 2008 all of our loans
were Prime Rate Loans. The interest rate on our revolving line of credit was 5.00% at September
30, 2009. The amount available on our revolving line of credit at September 30, 2009 was $37.8
million. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that we must comply with to obtain
funding and avoid an event of default. As of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all
covenants under the revolving line of credit.
D. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
We are subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. At this time,
it is not possible to estimate the ultimate loss or gain, if any, related to these lawsuits, nor if
any such loss will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
position.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of
applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to
lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been
completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the
lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we have no outstanding commitments to
lend.
Dividends
On October 19, 2009 we declared a dividend of $.05 payable on November 13, 2009 to the
shareholders of record on October 30, 2009.
E. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions
Are Participating
Securities, effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This standard was
subsequently codified into Accounting Standards Codification Topic (ASC 260-10-45). ASC 260-10-45
clarifies that unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
computation of EPS pursuant to the two class method. The adoption
10
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
of ASC 260-10-45 (EITF 03-6-1) did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded
Feature) is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock, which was codified into ASC Topic 815-40-15
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. This topic addresses the determination of whether an instrument (or an embedded
feature) is indexed to an entitys own stock. If an instrument (or an embedded feature) that has
the characteristics of a derivative instrument under the relative paragraphs of Statement 133 is
indexed to an entitys own stock, it is still necessary to evaluate whether it is classified in
stockholders equity (or would be classified in stockholders equity if it were a freestanding
instrument). The guidance in this topic shall be applied to outstanding instruments as of the
beginning of the fiscal year in which this Issue is initially applied. The cumulative effect of the
change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or net assets in the statement of
financial position) for that fiscal year, presented separately. However, in circumstances in which
a previously bifurcated embedded conversion option in a convertible debt instrument no longer meets
the bifurcation criteria in Statement 133 at initial application of this topic, the carrying amount
of the liability for the conversion option (that is, its fair value on the date of adoption) shall
be reclassified to shareholders equity. Any debt discount that was recognized when the conversion
option was initially bifurcated from the convertible debt instrument shall continue to be
amortized. The adoption of ASC 815-40-15 did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2009, we have early adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments an amendment to FASB Statement No. 107
(FAS 107) and APB Opinion No. 28 (APB 28) which were codified into ASC Topics 825-10-50 and
270-10-05. The FSP amends FAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of
publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This also amends APB 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. The adoption of ASC 825-10-50 and ASC 270-10-05 has been included in
the disclosures in this Form 10-Q.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly which provides further clarification for guidance provided regarding measurement
of fair values of assets and liabilities when the market activity has significantly decreased and
in identifying transactions that are not orderly. This was codified into ASC Topic ACS
820-10-65-4. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 , Recognition and Presentation of
Other-than-Temporary Impairments which was codified into ASC 320-10-65. This topic amends the
other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more
operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on
debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This ASC does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than- temporary impairments of equity
securities. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Measuring
Liabilities at Fair Value which provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is
required to measure fair value using a valuation technique. A valuation technique that uses the
quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar
liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. Another valuation technique that is
consistent with the principles of Topic 820. The guidance provided in this update is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance. Management is currently
evaluating ASC 820-10 to determine if it will have a material impact on the Companys future
financial statements.
11
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165) Subsequent
Events. which was codified into ASC 855-10-5. This topic establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Statement is effective for
interim and annual fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has evaluated the effect
of the adoption of this standard and has concluded it has no material effect on our financial
position or results of operations. Management has reviewed events occurring through November 16,
2009, the date the financial statements were issued, and the Company has determined that no
subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or additional disclosure other than events that have
been disclosed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles which was codified into ASC 105-10-65.
This topic established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative
accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non governmental entities in the
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also
sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Following this statement, the Board will not
issue new standards in the forms of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts. Instead it will issue Accounting Standards Updates. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
12
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, words such as believes, anticipates, expects, and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to: our need for financing in order to originate leases and contracts; our dependence on
point-of-sale authorization systems and expansion into new markets; our significant capital
requirements; risks associated with economic downturns including the higher delinquency rates
associated with such downturns; higher interest rates; intense competition; changes in our
regulatory environment; the availability of qualified personnel, and risks associated with
acquisitions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect
our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We cannot assure that we
will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely affect our operating
results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered indicative of results
to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may result in fluctuations in
the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend payments or our current
dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future dividends will be paid. For
a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, see
the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides microticket equipment leasing
and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment through 2008 and year to
date 2009 was approximately $5,500 while Leasecomm historically financed contracts of approximately
$1,900. Our existing portfolio consists of business equipment leased or rented primarily to small
commercial enterprises.
We finance the funding of our leases and contracts primarily through cash on hand and our
revolving line of credit. On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million
revolving line of credit with Sovereign Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. On
July 9, 2008 we entered into an amended agreement to increase this revolving line of credit with
Sovereign to $60 million. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and
a security interest in all of our other assets and, until February 2009, bore interest at Prime
Rate or at LIBOR plus 2.75%. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless
we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a
Prime Rate Loan.
On February 10, 2009 we entered into an amended agreement to increase our revolving line of
credit with Sovereign to $85 million. Under the amended agreement, outstanding borrowings bear
interest at Prime plus 1.75% or LIBOR plus 3.75%, in each case subject to a minimum interest rate
of 5%. The facility matures on August 2, 2010.
In a typical lease transaction, we originate a lease through a nationwide network of equipment
vendors, independent sales organizations and brokers. Upon our approval of a lease application and
verification that the lessee has received the equipment and signed the lease, we pay the dealer for
the cost of the equipment, plus the dealers profit margin.
13
In the past, we have also from time to time acquired service contracts under which a homeowner
purchases a security system and simultaneously signs a contract with the dealer for the monitoring
of that system for a monthly fee. Upon approval of the monitoring application and verification
with the homeowner that the system is installed, we would purchase the right to the payment stream
under the monitoring contract from the dealer at a negotiated multiple of the monthly payments. We
have not purchased any new security monitoring contracts since 2004, and anticipate that service
contract revenue will continue to decline over time.
Substantially all leases originated or acquired by us are non-cancelable. During the term of
the lease, we are scheduled to receive payments sufficient to cover our borrowing costs and the
cost of the underlying equipment and provide us with an appropriate profit. We pass along some of
the costs of our leases and contracts by charging late fees, prepayment penalties, loss and damage
waiver fees and other service fees, when applicable. Collection fees are imposed based on our
estimate of the costs of collection. The loss and damage waiver fees are charged if a customer
fails to provide proof of insurance and are reasonably related to the cost of replacing the lost or
damaged equipment or product. The initial non-cancelable term of the lease is equal to or less than
the equipments estimated economic life and often provides us with additional revenues based on the
residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease. Initial terms of the leases in our
portfolio generally range from 12 to 60 months, with an average initial term of 45 months as of
December 31, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result,
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
the related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of
existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and
other sources, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for
credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation
are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have reviewed and
determined that those policies remain our critical accounting policies and we did not make any
changes in those policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Results of Operations Three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing
leases |
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
$ |
6,030 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
2,330 |
|
Income on service
contracts |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
Loss and damage waiver
fees |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Service fees and other
income |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
11,970 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
$ |
10,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were $12.0 million, an increase
of $1.9 million, or 18.7%, from the three months ended September 30, 2008. The overall increase
was due to an increase of $1.6 million in income on financing leases, an increase of $0.6 million
in fees and other income, partially offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in rental income, a
decrease of $0.1 million in income on service contracts, and a decrease of $23,000 in interest
income. The increase in income on financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new
lease originations. The decline in rental income is the result of the attrition of Leasecomm rental
contracts which is partially offset by TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to
rentals. Service contract revenue continues to decline since we have not funded any new service
contracts since 2004.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
$ |
3,260 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.3 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses increased by
$89,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily driven by increases in employee related expenses
associated with increased headcount. Headcount as of September 30, 2009 was 106 as compared to 94
at the same period in 2008.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $1.7 million, or
43.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008, while net charge-offs increased by 76.2% to $5.1 million. The 90-day
delinquent lease payments receivable on an exposure basis increased by 36.5% to $24.5 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to $17.9 million at September 30, 2008. The increase in the allowance
for credit losses reflects both the increased size of our lease portfolio and increased delinquency
levels.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
100 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(92.1 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
|
79.6 |
% |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
15
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on lease contracts that have converted to rental contracts increased by
$220,000 and amortization of service contracts decreased by $35,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in
depreciation is due to TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals. The
decreases in amortization are due to the decrease in the overall size of our portfolio of service
contracts as well as the fact that a greater percentage of the service contracts are fully
amortized. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $10,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Service contracts were recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
In a typical service contract acquisition, a homeowner will purchase a home security system and
simultaneously sign a contract with the security dealer for monthly monitoring of the system. The
security dealer would then sell the rights to that monthly payment to us. We perform all of the
processing, billing, collection and administrative work on the service contract. The estimated
life is based upon the expected life of such contracts in the security monitoring industry and our
historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 84 month term,
the remaining net book value is expensed. We have not originated any new service contracts since
2004.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
|
142.3 |
% |
|
$ |
310 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
increased by $441,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008. This increase resulted primarily from our increased level of
borrowings and debt closing costs on our revolving line of credit. At September 30, 2009, the
outstanding balance under our revolving line of credit was $47.2 million compared to a balance of
$41.1million at September 30, 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
905 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes decreased by
$138,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008. This decrease resulted primarily from the $495,000 decrease in pre-tax income
and was partially offset by an increase in the
16
effective tax rate from 36.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 to 38.5% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, we had a liability of $293,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $170,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax
matters. As of September 30, 2009 we had a liability of $286,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and
a liability of $156,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately
$288,000 would impact our effective tax rate after a $155,000 federal tax benefit for state income
taxes. The decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits and interest is due to the release of certain
state reserves related to the expiration of various state statutes of limitations on exposure
items. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change
significantly within the next twelve months; however, at this time we are unable to estimate the
change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2005 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2003.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $20.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$4.7 million or 29.0%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and net investment in
rental contracts increased from $180.6 million at June 30, 2009 to $191.7 million at September 30,
2009. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $3.6 million, or 31.8%, to $14.8
million during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Results of Operations Nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
21,522 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
$ |
16,566 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
6,471 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
7,566 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
720 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(87.3 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
33,956 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
$ |
28,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $34.0 million, an increase of
$5.0 million, or 17.2%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The overall increase was
due to an increase of $5.0 million in income on financing leases, and a $1.4 million increase in
fees and other income partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in rental income, a decrease
of $0.2 million in income on service contracts and a decrease of $0.1 million in interest income.
The increase in income on financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new lease
originations. The decline in rental income is the result of attrition of Leasecomm rental contracts
which is partially offset by TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals.
Service contract revenue continues to decline since we have not been actively funding new service
contracts.
17
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
10,413 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
$ |
9,697 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses increased by
$716,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily driven by increases in employee related expenses
associated with increased headcount.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
% |
|
$ |
10,199 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $5.7 million, or
55.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2008, while net charge-offs increased by 148.8% to $13.7 million. The 90-day delinquent lease
payments receivable on an exposure basis increased by 36.5% to $24.5 million at September 30, 2009
compared to $17.9 million at September 30, 2008. The increase in the allowance for credit losses
reflects both the increased size of our lease portfolio and increased delinquency levels.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
$ |
284 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(80.8 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
% |
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $540,000 and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $122,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in depreciation is due primarily to the increase
in the number of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and
converting to rentals. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $35,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
18
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
In a typical service contract acquisition, a homeowner will purchase a home security system and
simultaneously sign a contract with the security dealer for monthly monitoring of the system. The
security dealer will then sell the rights to that monthly payment to us. We perform all of the
processing, billing, collection and administrative work on the service contract. The estimated
life is based upon the expected life of such contracts in the security monitoring industry and our
historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 84 month term,
the remaining net book value is expensed. We have not funded any new service contracts since 2004.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
|
|
177.0 |
% |
|
$ |
696 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
increased by $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. This increase resulted primarily from our increased level of
borrowings and debt closing costs on our revolving line of credit. At September 30, 2009, the
outstanding balance under our revolving line of credit was $47.2 million compared to $41.1 million,
at September 30, 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,761 |
|
|
|
(34.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,670 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.8 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes decreased by
$909,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. This decrease resulted primarily from the $3.1 million decrease in pre-tax
income partially offset by an increase in the effective tax rate from 34.8% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 to 38.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
As of December 31, 2008, we had a liability of $293,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $152,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax
matters. As of September 30, 2009 we had a liability of $286,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and
a liability of $156,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately
$288,000 would impact our effective tax rate after a $155,000 federal tax benefit for state income
taxes. The decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits and interest is due to the release of certain
state reserves related to the expiration of various state statutes of limitations on exposure
items. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change
significantly within the next 12 months; however at this time we are unable to estimate the change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2005 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2003.
19
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $57.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$6.0 million or 11.7%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investments in service contracts and investment in
rental contracts increased from $162.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $191.7 million at September
30, 2009. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $10.5 million, or 33.4%, to $41.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
Exposure to Credit Losses
The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure
basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis
aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For
example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all
amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease
receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at
the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including
all amounts billed and unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will
be placed in the over 90 days past due category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Current |
|
$ |
134,469 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
$ |
110,423 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
% |
31-60 days past due |
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Over 90 days past due |
|
|
24,456 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
20,438 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables due in installments |
|
$ |
169,934 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
142,881 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our lease and finance business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial credit
to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through
borrowings under our credit facilities, on-balance sheet securitizations, the issuance of
subordinated debt, free cash flow and our initial public offering completed in February 1999. We
will continue to require significant additional capital to maintain and expand our funding of
leases and contracts, as well as to fund any future acquisitions of leasing companies or
portfolios. In the near term, we expect to finance our business utilizing the cash on hand and our
revolving line of credit which matures in August 2010. Additionally, our uses of cash include the
payment of interest and principal on borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses,
income taxes and capital expenditures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, our primary sources of liquidity were
cash provided by operating activities and borrowings on our revolving line of credit. We generated
cash flow from operations of $41.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$31.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2009, we had
approximately $47.2 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility and had available
borrowing capacity of approximately $37.8 million as described below. During the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, we drew down additional cash against our revolving line of credit as a
precautionary measure. Cash on hand was $1.3 million at September 30, 2009 compared to a cash
balance of $20.0 million at September 30, 2008.
We used net cash in investing activities of $58.0 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and $51.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Investing
activities primarily relate to the origination of leases and the increase in cash used is
consistent with our focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.
20
Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and net cash provided by financing activities was $32.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Financing activities primarily consist of the borrowings and
repayments under our revolving line of credit and dividend payments.
We believe that cash flows from our existing portfolio, cash on hand, and available borrowings
under our amended credit facility will be sufficient to support our operations and lease
origination activity in the near term. Given the tight credit conditions in the current
marketplace, it may be difficult for us to obtain additional low cost capital. An inability to
renew or replace our existing credit facility would significantly impact our ability to grow the
business. Our existing credit facility is scheduled to mature in August 2010.
Borrowings
We utilize our credit facilities to fund the origination and acquisition of leases that
satisfy the eligibility requirements established pursuant to the facility. Borrowings outstanding
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
(dollars in 000) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
Revolving credit
facility
(1) |
|
$ |
47,207 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
$ |
37,793 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
33,325 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
$ |
26,675 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unused capacity is subject to the borrowing base formula. |
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a three-year $30 million revolving line of credit with
Sovereign based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. On July 9, 2008 we entered into an
amended agreement to increase our revolving line of credit with Sovereign to $60 million. The
maturity date of the amended agreement is August 2, 2010. Outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets and,
until February 2009, bore interest at Prime or at LIBOR plus 2.75%. Under the terms of the
facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed
at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan.
On February 10, 2009 we entered into an amended agreement to increase our revolving line of
credit with Sovereign to $85 million. Under the amended agreement, outstanding borrowings bear
interest at Prime plus 1.75% or LIBOR plus 3.75%, in each case subject to a minimum interest rate
of 5%. All other terms of the facility remained the same. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, all
of our loans were Prime Rate Loans.
Dividends
On October 19, 2009 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on November 13, 2009 to
shareholders of record on October 30, 2009. On July 14, 2009 we declared a dividend of $0.05
payable on August 14, 2009 to shareholders of record on July 30, 2009. On April 16, 2009 we
declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on May 8, 2009 to shareholders of record on April 30, 2009.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on January
19, 2009 to shareholders of record as of January 5, 2009.
On October 24, 2008 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on November 14, 2008 to the
shareholders of record on November 5, 2008. On July 25, 2008 we declared a dividend of $0.05
payable on August 15, 2008 to the shareholders of record on August 5, 2008. On April 25, 2008 we
declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on May 15, 2008 to shareholders of record on May 5, 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 we did not declare a dividend.
Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of
Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in
light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external
financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give
no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.
21
Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements, that
require future payments. At December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under our revolving line of
credit was $33.3 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 we borrowed $66.5
million against our revolving line of credit and repaid $52.6 million. The $47.2 million of
outstanding borrowings as of September 30, 2009 will be repaid by the application of TimePayment
receipts and other payments to our outstanding balance. Our future minimum lease payments under
non-cancelable operating leases are $237,000 annually for the years December 2009 and 2010.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but
not limited to the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting
information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is
successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note E of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
22
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking
statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of operations, we also face risks
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and
legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.
The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to
the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When
we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to
achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we
expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in
interest rates during the term of each lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or
result in a negative spread.
Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a
blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of
September 30, 2009, we had repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and had $47.2 million of outstanding
variable interest rate obligations under our revolving line of credit.
Our revolving line of credit bears interest at rates which fluctuate with changes in the Prime
Rate or LIBOR; therefore, our interest expense is sensitive to changes in market interest rates.
The effect of a 10% adverse change in market interest rates, sustained for one year, on our
interest expense would be immaterial.
We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The
primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by
limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment
choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial
instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Internal controls over financial reporting: During the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2009, no changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
23
Part II Other Information
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. At this time,
it is not possible to estimate the ultimate loss or gain, if any, related to these lawsuits, nor if
any such loss will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
position.
For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial
performance and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere
in this report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results.
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Organization, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
in the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-56639, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 1998). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 in the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 28, 2007). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MicroFinancial Incorporated
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard F. Latour
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James R. Jackson Jr.
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: November 16, 2009
25