e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 26, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York
|
|
14624 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
|
Smaller reporting company
þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, of the registrant outstanding as
of August 4, 2010 was 7,292,169.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
|
17,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold |
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
Cost of Services Sold |
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
4,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold |
|
|
15,270 |
|
|
|
13,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other (Income) Expense, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,287 |
|
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
7,388 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $121
and $82 as of June 26, 2010 and March 27, 2010, respectively |
|
|
8,738 |
|
|
|
11,439 |
|
Other Receivables |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
7,046 |
|
|
|
5,906 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
18,041 |
|
|
|
19,367 |
|
Property and Equipment, net |
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,038 |
|
|
|
10,038 |
|
Intangible Assets, net |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
34,128 |
|
|
$ |
35,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
|
$ |
8,798 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
9,720 |
|
|
|
12,220 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
2,931 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
13,393 |
|
|
|
15,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,709,108 and 7,698,450 shares issued as of June 26, 2010 and
March 27, 2010, respectively; 7,290,326 and 7,279,668 shares
outstanding as of June 26, 2010 and March 27, 2010, respectively |
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
9,552 |
|
|
|
9,357 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
8,582 |
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 418,782 shares as of
June 26, 2010 and March 27, 2010 |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
20,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
34,128 |
|
|
$ |
35,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash
(Used in) Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory
Reserves |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables |
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
283 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
Payments on Other Debt Obligations |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Payment of Contingent Consideration |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Income Taxes, net |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value |
|
|
of Par |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of March 27, 2010 |
|
|
7,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,849 |
|
|
$ |
9,357 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
8,304 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
$ |
(1,635 |
) |
|
$ |
20,257 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Unrecognized Prior Service
Cost, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
7,709 |
|
|
$ |
3,855 |
|
|
$ |
9,552 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
8,582 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
$ |
(1,635 |
) |
|
$ |
20,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc. (Transcat or the Company) is a leading global
distributor of professional grade handheld test and measurement instruments and accredited provider
of calibration, repair and weighing system services primarily for the pharmaceutical and
FDA-regulated, industrial manufacturing, energy and utilities, chemical process, and other
industries.
Basis of Presentation: Transcats unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for
interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the Consolidated
Financial Statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been
included. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the fiscal year. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the fiscal year ended
March 27, 2010 (fiscal year 2010) contained in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat has determined the fair value of debt and other
financial instruments using a valuation hierarchy. The hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs
used in measuring fair value, consists of three levels. Level 1 uses observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices in active markets
that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, which is defined as unobservable
inputs in which little or no market data exists, requires the Company to develop its own
assumptions. The carrying amount of debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair
value due to variable interest rate pricing, and the carrying amounts for cash, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term
nature.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for all
equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair
market value of the award as of the grant date. The Company records compensation cost related to
unvested stock awards by recognizing, on a straight-line basis, the unamortized grant date fair
value over the remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of
stock awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity.
Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the
deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company did
not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. The Company estimates
forfeiture rates based on its historical experience. During the first quarter of the fiscal year
ending March 26, 2011 (fiscal year 2011) and fiscal year 2010, the Company recorded non-cash
stock-based compensation cost in the amount of $0.2 million in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions: The accounts of Transmation (Canada) Inc., the
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, are maintained in the local currency and have been translated to
U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities, except for equity,
have been translated at the period-end rates of exchange and related revenue and expense accounts
have been translated at average rates of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising from
translation of Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance sheets into U.S. dollars are recorded directly
to the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian business transactions. The net
foreign currency loss was less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and
2010. The Company periodically utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk
that its earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company
does not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which
totaled less than $0.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, was
recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss). The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change
in fair value on the underlying accounts receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged.
On June 26, 2010, the Company had a foreign exchange contract, set to mature in July 2010,
outstanding in the notional amount of $0.4 million. The Company does not use hedging arrangements
for speculative purposes.
7
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
of common stock reflect the assumed conversion of stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted
stock awards using the treasury stock method in periods in which they have a dilutive effect. In
computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from the
exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock and the related tax benefits are
considered to have been used to purchase shares of common stock at the average market prices during
the period, and the resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in the calculation
of average shares of common stock outstanding.
The average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 26, |
|
June 27, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Average Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
7,287 |
|
|
|
7,388 |
|
Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents (1) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive Common Stock Equivalents |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to Transcats net loss in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, 0.2
million shares of dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the
computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive. |
Subsequent Events: The Company has evaluated all events and transactions that occurred
subsequent to June 26, 2010. No material subsequent events have occurred that require recognition
or disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain reclassifications of financial information for the prior
fiscal year have been made to conform to the presentation for the
current fiscal year.
NOTE 2 DEBT
Description. Transcat, through a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. maturing in August 2011, has a revolving credit facility in the amount of $15.0 million
(the Revolving Credit Facility). As of June 26, 2010, $15.0 million was available under the
Credit Agreement, of which $2.9 million was outstanding and included in long-term debt on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Interest and Commitment Fees. Interest on the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of prime, a three month certificate of
deposit plus 1%, or the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%) (the Base Rate) or the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case, plus a margin. Commitment fees accrue based on the average
daily amount of unused credit available on the Revolving Credit Facility. Interest and commitment
fees are adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as
defined in the Credit Agreement. The Base Rate and the LIBOR rates as of June 26, 2010 were 3.3%
and 0.3%, respectively. The Companys interest rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2011
ranged from 1.2% to 2.8%.
Covenants. The Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply,
including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant. The Company was in
compliance with all loan covenants and requirements throughout the first quarter of fiscal year
2011.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property and
the common stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Transmation (Canada) Inc., as collateral security
for the loans made under the Revolving Credit Facility.
NOTE 3 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended (the 2003 Plan), provides for, among other
awards, grants of restricted stock and stock options to directors, officers and key employees to
purchase common stock at no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. At June 26,
2010, the number of shares available for future grant under the 2003 Plan totaled 0.2 million.
8
In addition, Transcat maintains a warrant plan for directors (the Directors Warrant Plan).
Under the Directors Warrant Plan, as amended, warrants have been granted to non-employee directors
to purchase common stock at the fair market value at the date of grant. All warrants authorized
for issuance pursuant to the Directors Warrant Plan have been granted and were fully vested as of
August 2009.
Restricted Stock: During the first quarter of fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company
granted performance-based restricted stock awards in place of options as a primary component of
executive compensation. The performance-based restricted stock awards vest after three years
subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible
three-year period.
Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted stock awards will
equal the grant date fair market value of the award that coincides with the actual outcome of the
performance conditions. On an interim basis, the Company records compensation cost based on an
assessment of the probability of achieving the performance conditions. At June 26, 2010, the
Company estimated the probability of achievement for the performance-based awards granted in fiscal
years 2011, 2010 and 2009 to be 100%, 75% and 0% of the target levels, respectively. Total expense
relating to performance-based restricted stock awards, based on grant date fair value and the
estimated probability of achievement, was less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal
years 2011 and 2010. Unearned compensation totaled $0.4 million as of June 26, 2010.
Stock Options: Options generally vest over a period of up to four years, using either a
graded schedule or on a straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The
expense relating to options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for the entire award. Total expense relating to options was $0.1 million in the first
quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010.
The following table summarizes the Companys options as of and for the first quarter ended June 26,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 27, 2010 |
|
|
674 |
|
|
$ |
5.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
1,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first
quarter of fiscal year 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock
options) that would have been received by the option holders had all holders exercised their
options on June 26, 2010. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair
market value of the Companys stock.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of June 26, 2010 was
$0.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of one year. The
aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 was
less than $0.1 million. Cash received from the exercise of options in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2011 was less than $0.1 million. There were no options exercised in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010.
9
Warrants: The warrants expire in five years from the date of grant. The following table
summarizes warrants as of and for the first quarter ended June 26, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 27, 2010 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first
quarter of fiscal year 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
warrants) that would have been received by the warrant holders had all holders exercised their
warrants on June 26, 2010. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair
market value of the Companys stock.
NOTE 4 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment
information for the first quarter ended June 26, 2010 and June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
|
17,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product (1) |
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
Service (1) |
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Provision for (Benefit From)
Income Taxes |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on actual amounts, a
percentage of revenues, headcount, and managements estimates. |
10
NOTE 5 ACQUISITIONS
On January 27, 2010, Transcat, through its wholly-owned subsidiary USEC Acquisition Corp., acquired
United Scale & Engineering Corporation. At the date of purchase, the Company accrued contingent
consideration in the amount of $0.2 million relating to certain holdback provisions under the terms
of the purchase agreement. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, Transcat paid less than
$0.1 million in partial satisfaction of this contingency. As of June 26, 2010, $0.2 million in
contingent consideration remains accrued and is included in other current liabilities in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On August 14, 2008, Transcat acquired Westcon. At closing, Transcat and the sole shareholder of
Westcon entered into an earn out agreement. This agreement provides that the sole shareholder may
be entitled to certain contingent earn out payments subject to continued employment and achieving
certain post-closing gross profit and revenue targets. During the first quarter of fiscal years
2011 and 2010, payments totaling less than $0.1 million were earned and recorded as compensation
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total earn
out consideration unpaid as of June 26, 2010 was $0.1 million and is included in other current
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements. This report and, in particular, the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These include statements concerning expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (Transcat, we, us, or our). Words
such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results
and outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking
statements. When considering these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should keep in mind
the cautionary statements contained elsewhere in this report and in any documents incorporated
herein by reference. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time and we cannot predict
those events or how they may affect us. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and
uncertainties that may affect Transcats operating and financial results and its ability to achieve
its financial objectives, interested parties should review the Risk Factors sections in
Transcats reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2010. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and
returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts
receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not
appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed,
the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is
calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe.
The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenues
and/or the historical rate of returns.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure the cost of services received in exchange for all equity
awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair market
value of the award as of the grant date. We record compensation cost related to unvested stock
awards by recognizing, on a straight-line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the
remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards are
presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax
benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred
tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. We did not capitalize
any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our
historical experience.
Options generally vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or on a
straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to options
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
During the first quarter of fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, we granted performance-based
restricted stock awards in place of options as a primary component of executive compensation. The
performance-based restricted stock awards vest after three years subject to certain cumulative
diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible three-year period. Compensation cost
ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted stock awards will equal the grant-date
fair market value of the award that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance
conditions. On an interim basis, we record compensation cost based on an assessment of the
probability of achieving the performance conditions. At June 26, 2010 we estimated the probability
of achievement for the performance-based awards granted in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 to be
100%, 75% and 0% of the target levels, respectively.
Revenue Recognition. Product sales are recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfer
to the customer. We recognize the majority of our service revenue based upon when the calibration
or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some service
revenue is generated from managing customers calibration programs in which we recognize revenue in
equal amounts at fixed intervals. We generally invoice our customers for freight, shipping, and
handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related
revenues are recorded based upon historical data.
12
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain reclassifications of financial information for the prior
fiscal year have been made to conform to the presentation for the
current fiscal year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, for the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, the components
of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 26, |
|
June 27, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Gross Profit Percentage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Service Gross Profit |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Total Gross Profit |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
Service Revenue |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Total Other Expense, net |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 26, 2010 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
5,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,628 |
|
|
$ |
17,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $3.4 million or 19.9% from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to the
first quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Our product net sales accounted for 62.9% of our total net revenue in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2011 and 65.5% of our total net revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. For the
first quarter of fiscal year 2011, product sales increased $1.7 million or 15.1% compared to the
first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This growth was aided by a comparison to a depressed first
quarter of fiscal year 2010 that was negatively impacted by the weaker economy and incremental
products sales from United Scale & Engineering Corporation (United Scale), which we acquired
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. Our fiscal years 2011 and 2010 product sales growth
in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Growth (Decline) |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
(7.6 |
%) |
|
|
(8.5 |
%) |
Our average product sales per business day increased to $203 in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2011, compared with $176 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Our product sales per
business day for each fiscal quarter during the fiscal years 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Per Business Day |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, sales through our direct distribution channel
increased 13.8% from the same period in the prior fiscal year. In addition to incremental revenue
from United Scale, direct sales to our traditional U.S., International and Canadian markets all
increased. These increases were partially offset by declining sales to wind energy industry
customers. Wind energy product sales, which represented 3.3% and 10.6% of our total product net
sales in the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively, declined due to the timing
of projects. Sales to our reseller channel increased 19.2% from the first quarter of fiscal year
2010 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, mainly attributed to the improved economic
conditions during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. With somewhat constrained sales growth in
our direct sales channel due to the declining wind energy sales, the mix of reseller sales as a
percent of our total product net sales increased 80 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. The following table presents the percent of
net sales for the significant product distribution channels for each fiscal quarter during fiscal
years 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Percent of Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
|
75.2 |
% |
|
|
70.8 |
% |
|
|
77.5 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
Reseller |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
Freight Billed to Customer |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer product orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our
inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock.
Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to
be calibrated in our laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete, and
orders required to be shipped at a future date. Our total pending product shipments for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2011 increased by $0.5 million, or 32.2%, from the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in backorders. As the economy
improved and the demand in the marketplace increased, manufacturers were slower to respond, thus
resulting in longer lead times for many of the products we sell. In addition, our backorders
14
included $0.3 million of incremental pending product shipments associated with United Scale. The
following table presents the percentage of total pending product shipments that are backorders at
the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and our historical trend of total pending product
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Total Pending Product Shipments |
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
% of Pending Product Shipments
that are Backorders |
|
|
78.6 |
% |
|
|
|
90.6 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
Service revenue increased $1.7 million, or 28.8%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. The growth can be attributed to expansion of our
existing customer base, incremental revenue associated with United Scale and increased third party
vendor services provided to customers in the wind energy industry. Also, within any year, while we
add new customers, we also have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for
any number of factors. Among those factors are variations in the timing of customer periodic
calibrations on instruments and other services, customer capital expenditures and customer
outsourcing decisions. Because the timing of calibration orders and segment expenses can vary on a
quarter-to-quarter basis, we believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a better indication of
the progress of this segment. Service segment revenue for the twelve months ended June 26, 2010
were $29.6 million, up 21.8% when compared with $24.3 million for the twelve months ended June 27,
2009. Our fiscal years 2011 and 2010 service revenue growth in relation to prior fiscal year
quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Revenue Growth |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it
costly and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment
and uniquely-trained personnel necessary to perform all measurement disciplines with in-house
calibration capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in the core electrical,
temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines. Accordingly, we have historically outsourced
15% to 20% of Service segment revenue to third party vendors for calibration or services beyond our
chosen scope of capabilities. In recent quarters, we have experienced a higher percentage of
outsourced revenue above our historical norms due to specific services provided to wind energy
customers, which fall outside our current scope of capabilities. We will continue to evaluate the
need for capital investments that could provide more in-house capabilities for our staff of
technicians and reduce the need for third party vendors in certain instances. The following table
presents the source of our service segment revenue and the percent of service segment revenue for
the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Percent of Service Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depot/Onsite |
|
|
74.4 |
% |
|
|
|
75.9 |
% |
|
|
73.5 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
% |
|
|
79.3 |
% |
Outsourced |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Freight Billed to Customers |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
3,501 |
|
|
$ |
2,648 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,358 |
|
|
$ |
3,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit dollars in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 increased $1.5 million, or
37.9%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. As a percentage of total net revenue, total
gross profit increased 340 basis points over the same time period.
We evaluate product gross profit from two perspectives. Channel gross profit includes net sales
less the direct cost of inventory sold. Our total product gross profit includes channel gross
profit as well as the impact of vendor rebates,
15
cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight expenses and direct
shipping costs. In general, our total product gross profit can vary based upon price discounting;
the mix of sales to our reseller channel, which have lower margins than our direct customer base;
and the timing of periodic vendor rebates and cooperative advertising income received from
suppliers.
The channel gross profit percentage in our direct distribution channel improved 70 basis points
from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. As the
economy has improved, we have seen an increase in the number of potential customers within the
marketplace, thus lessening the competitive pricing structure experienced during the weaker economy
and allowing us to reduce price discounting. Within the reseller channel, we maintained a
relatively consistent quarter-over-quarter channel gross profit percentage as a result of our
continued use of a volume-based pricing structure.
Total product gross profit in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 was 27.0% of total product
sales and improved 350 basis points when compared with 23.5% of total product sales in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010. Product gross profit improved $0.9 million in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which was the result of
increased volume, $0.1 million in additional cooperative advertising income and $0.2 million in
vendor point-of-sale rebates. Vendor point-of-sale rebates are based on year-over-year growth in
product segment sales. We did not qualify for this type of rebate in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010. The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our product gross profit
as a percent of total product sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Channel Gross Profit % Direct (1) |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
Channel Gross Profit % Reseller (1) |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channel Gross Profit % Combined (2) |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Other Items % (3) |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Gross Profit % |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Channel gross profit % is calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by
net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents aggregate gross profit % for direct and reseller channels, calculated as net
sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers,
freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration service gross profit increased $0.6 million, or 50.1%, from the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. As a percent of Service revenue,
calibration service gross profit increased 350 basis points over the same time period. This is
indicative of the margin expansion opportunities within the Service segment as many of the costs
within this segment are fixed. Despite the significant increase in gross profit, margin expansion
was somewhat constrained as third party vendor calibrations and services contributed a significant
portion of the revenue growth in the wind energy industry and the incremental revenue from United
Scale was mostly offset by associated incremental service costs. The following table reflects our
calibration services gross profit growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Gross Profit Dollar Growth |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse |
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
2,539 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,907 |
|
|
$ |
4,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.9 million, or 22.6%, from the first quarter of fiscal year
2010 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. As a percentage of net revenue, operating expenses
in the current period were 23.8%, up from 23.3% in the prior year period, primarily due to $0.3
million in incremental operating expenses associated with United Scale. Selling, marketing and
warehouse expenses increased $0.5 million, or 20.1%, to $3.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2011
16
compared with the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase mirrors our revenue growth for the
quarter and is due to incremental United Scale costs, increased investments in sales personnel and
other direct marketing efforts to gain market share and to further mine our existing customer base.
Administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 27.1%, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as a
result of higher employee-related expenses and expenses related to United Scale.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 26, |
|
June 27, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
Our effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were 37.4% and
38.6%, respectively. We continue to evaluate our tax provision on a quarterly basis and make
adjustments, as deemed necessary, to our effective tax rate given changes in facts and
circumstances expected for the entire fiscal year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that amounts available under our current credit facility and our cash on hand are
sufficient to satisfy our expected working capital and capital expenditure needs as well as our
lease commitments for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 26, |
|
June 27, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash (Used in) Provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
(211 |
) |
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
Operating Activities: Net cash used in operations was $0.2 million for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2011 compared to $1.5 million of cash provided by operating activities in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010. Significant working capital fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
Inventory/Accounts Payable: Our inventory balance at June 26, 2010 was $7.0
million, an increase of $1.1 million when compared to $5.9 million on-hand on March 27,
2010. The increase was primarily due to our strategic decision to maintain higher
inventory levels of specific, higher-volume products, in support of greater sales
growth and in response to increased lead times from manufacturers. During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we decreased inventory levels by $0.6 million in
response to recessionary economic conditions. In general, our accounts payable balance
increases or decreases with inventory levels. However, this correlation may vary at a
quarter-end due to the timing of vendor payments for inventory receipts and inventory
shipped directly to customers, as well as the timing of product sales. |
|
|
|
|
Receivables: We continue to maintain strong collections on our accounts receivable.
The following table illustrates our days sales outstanding for the fiscal quarters
ending in June 26, 2010 and June 27, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, |
|
June 27, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months |
|
$ |
14,732 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
$ |
8,738 |
|
|
$ |
8,116 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities: During the first quarter of fiscal
year 2011, we used $1.0 million in cash to pay accrued compensation and other
liabilities compared with $0.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This
increase was primarily attributable to higher payments for employee profit sharing and
performance-based management bonuses. |
17
Investing Activities: The $0.2 million of cash used in investing activities in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2011, a decrease of approximately $0.1 million when compared to the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010, was used primarily for improvements to our proprietary calibration software
program, additional service capabilities and information technology.
Financing Activities: During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, financing activities provided
approximately $0.4 million in cash, which was used to help reduce accounts payable and pay employee
profit sharing and performance-based management bonuses. In the first quarter of fiscal year
2010, $1.3 million of cash from operations was used to reduce debt.
OUTLOOK
Our outlook remains unchanged. We expect a strong second quarter compared with the
economic-challenged results of the prior year period and believe that the second half of fiscal
year 2011 will return to a more normalized environment and be in line with our longer-term growth
expectations. Additionally, we expect our bottom line to expand at a greater rate due to the
operating leverage inherent in the Service segment.
Wind energy industry projects are expected to increase over the next 18 months and it is our
expectation that we can continue to grow our market share in this field. However, the timing of
these projects and the related demand for our products and services remain difficult to predict.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. In the event
interest rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less
than $0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained constant. As of June 26, 2010,
$15.0 million was available under our credit facility, of which $2.9 million was outstanding and
included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Under our credit facility, as described in Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements,
interest is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. We mitigate
our interest rate risk by electing the lower of the base rate available under the credit facility
or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As of June 26, 2010, the base rate and the LIBOR
rate were 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively. Our interest rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2011
ranged from 1.2% to 2.8%. On June 26, 2010, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our
exposure to upward movements in interest rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Over 90% of our net revenues for the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were denominated
in U.S. dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the value of
the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would impact our net revenue by less than 1%. We monitor
the relationship between the U.S. and Canadian currencies on a continuous basis and adjust sales
prices for products and services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate.
We periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings
would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. We do not apply hedge
accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled less than
$0.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, was recognized as a component
of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The
change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying
accounts receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On June 26, 2010, we had a
foreign exchange contract, set to mature in July 2010, outstanding in the notional amount of $0.4
million. We do not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow
18
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive
officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by
this quarterly report (our first fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index to Exhibits.
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
Date: August 9, 2010
|
|
/s/ Charles P. Hadeed |
|
|
|
|
|
Charles P. Hadeed |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010
|
|
/s/ John J. Zimmer |
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Zimmer
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
20
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
10.1 |
|
Certain compensation information for Charles P. Hadeed,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the
Company is incorporated herein by reference from the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2010. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Certain compensation information for John J. Zimmer, Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company is incorporated herein by reference from the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 2010. |
(31) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(32) |
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
21