Form 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-14959
BRADY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
39-0178960 |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
6555 West Good Hope Road,
Milwaukee, WI 53223
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(414) 358-6600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, Par
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Value $.01 per share |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or four such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of January 31, 2011, was approximately $1,488,000,246 based on closing sale price of
$32.75 per share on that date as reported for the New York Stock Exchange). As of September 20,
2011, there were 49,244,116 outstanding shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock (the Class A
Common Stock), and 3,538,628 shares of Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, all of
which is held by affiliates of the registrant, is the only voting stock.
PART I
Brady Corporation and Subsidiaries are referred to herein as the Company, Brady, or we.
(a) General Development of Business
The Company, a Wisconsin corporation founded in 1914, currently operates globally in
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Cayman Islands, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong,
India, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines,
Poland, Singapore, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, the United Arab
Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Company also sells through subsidiaries or
sales offices in these countries, with additional sales through a dedicated team of international
sales representatives in Hungary, New Zealand, Russia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The Company further
markets its products to parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. The
Companys corporate headquarters are located at 6555 West Good Hope Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53223, and the telephone number is (414) 358-6600. The Companys Internet address is
http://www.bradycorp.com.
(b) Financial Information About Industry Segments
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(c) Narrative Description of Business
Overview
Brady Corporation is an international manufacturer and marketer of identification solutions
and specialty products that identify and protect premises, products and people. Bradys core
capabilities in manufacturing, channel management, printing systems, precision engineering and
materials expertise make it a leading supplier to customers in general manufacturing, maintenance
and safety, process industries, construction, electrical, telecommunications, electronics,
laboratory/healthcare, airline/transportation, brand protection, education, governmental, public
utility, and a variety of other industries. The Companys ability to provide customers with a broad
range of differentiated solutions both through the organic development of its existing business and
the acquisition of complementary and adjacent businesses, its commitment to quality and service,
its global footprint and its diversified sales channels have made it a world leader in many of its
markets.
Brady manufactures and markets a wide range of products for use in diverse applications. Major
product lines include facility identification; safety and complementary products; wire and cable
identification products; sorbent materials; people identification products; regulatory publishing;
high-performance identification products for product identification and work-in-process
identification; and bar-code labels and precision die-cut components for mobile telecommunications
devices, hard disk drives, medical devices and supplies, and automotive and numerous other
electronics industry applications. Products are marketed through multiple channels, including
distributors, resellers, business-to-business direct marketing and a direct sales force.
The need for the Companys products is driven, in part, by customer specifications, by
regulatory compliance requirements imposed by agencies such as the Occupational Safety & Health
Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States and
similar regulatory agencies around the world, and by the need to identify and track assets or to
identify, direct, warn, inform, train and protect people or products.
The Company has a broad customer base. No individual customer is 5% or more of total net
sales.
Competitive Strengths
The Company believes the following competitive strengths will allow it to achieve its growth
and profitability strategies:
Leader in Markets. Brady competes in markets where it believes it is often the leading
supplier with the manufacturing expertise, infrastructure, channels and sales resources necessary
to provide the required product or comprehensive solution. For example, the Company believes it is
the leading supplier of wire identification products to the North American MRO (Maintenance, Repair
and Operations) market and of precision die-cut components to the mobile telecommunications market.
The Company believes its leadership positions make it a preferred supplier to many of its customers
and enables it to be successful in its markets.
3
Differentiated Solutions and Commitment to Innovation. The Company believes its sophisticated
engineering and manufacturing capabilities, as well as its expertise in materials, give it a
competitive advantage in supplying customized or high specification product solutions to meet
individualized customer needs. The Company has been successful in identifying and incorporating
innovative technologies to create integrated and precise solutions. Additionally, it is able to use
its materials expertise and its investment in research and development to provide unique products
to meet the demands of end-customers in new, faster growing markets adjacent to its traditional
markets, such as laboratory identification, aerospace, defense, and mass transit.
Operational Excellence. Brady continues to improve in operational productivity. It employs
well-developed problem solving techniques through the Brady Business Performance System (BBPS)
and invests in state-of-the-art equipment to capture efficiencies. The Company is largely
vertically integrated and designs, manufactures and markets a majority of the products it sells.
The Company has consistently generated positive cash flow from operations by continually reducing
costs, improving working capital, and optimizing the efficiency of its manufacturing operations.
Broad Customer Base and Geographic Diversity. Brady believes its global infrastructure and
diverse market presence provide a solid platform for further expansion, and enable it to act as a
primary supplier to many of its global customers. Sales from international operations increased
from 44.4% of net sales in fiscal 2000 to 64.6% of net sales in fiscal 2011. Brady has more than
one million end-customers that operate in multiple industries.
Disciplined Acquisition and Integration Strategy. The Company has a dedicated team of
experienced professionals that employ a disciplined acquisition strategy and process to acquire
companies. It applies strict financial standards to evaluate all acquisitions using an expected
return model based on a modified return on invested capital calculation. It also conducts
disciplined integration reviews of acquired companies to track progress toward results expected at
the time of acquisition. Since 1996, the Company has acquired and integrated 57 companies to
increase market share in existing and new geographies, expand the product range it offers to both
existing and new customers, as well as add new technological capabilities.
Channel Diversity and Strength. Brady utilizes a wide range of channels to reach customers
across a broad array of industries. It employs multi-channel direct marketing expertise to meet its
customers need for convenience. The Company also has long-standing relationships with, and is a
preferred supplier to, many of its largest distributors. In addition, the Company employs a global
sales team to support both distributors and customers and to serve their productivity, tracking and
safety requirements. The Company believes its strong brands and reputation for quality, innovation
and on-time delivery contribute to the popularity of its products with distributors, original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs), resellers and other customers.
Deep and Talented Team. The Company believes that its team of employees has substantial depth
in critical operational areas and has demonstrated success in reducing costs, integrating
acquisitions and improving processes through economic cycles. The international experience of its
management team and its commitment to developing strong management teams in each of its local
operations is a competitive advantage. In addition, the Company believes it employs a world-class
team of people and dedicates significant resources to recruiting people committed to excellence and
investing in their potential. The depth and breadth of knowledge within the entire Brady
organization strengthens relationships with its customers and suppliers and enables the Company to
provide its customers with a high level of product and industry expertise.
Key Strategies
The Companys primary objectives are to build upon its leading market positions, to improve
its performance and profitability and to expand its existing activities through a multi-pronged
strategic approach that focuses on revenue expansion and improved productivity. The Companys key
strategies include:
Revenue Expansion
Capitalize on Growing Markets. The Company seeks to leverage its distribution network, global
footprint and strength in manufacturing and materials expertise to capitalize on growth in existing
markets. Growth prospects are driven primarily by the general expansion of regional economies,
changes in legal and regulatory compliance requirements and the increased need of customers to
identify and protect their assets and employees, as well as technological advances in markets such
as mobile telecommunications and other electronic devices.
4
Increase Market Share. Many Brady markets are fragmented and populated with smaller regional
or local competitors. The Company seeks to leverage its investment in new product development and
its global sales, operations and distribution capabilities to
increase market share, as well as expand its distribution channels to capture new customers.
The Company employs a dedicated and experienced sales team that works closely with existing
distributors and customers to identify and capture new opportunities. In addition, Brady continues
to leverage the strength of its brands, the quality of its products and its long-standing
relationships with key customers to build upon current market positions.
Enter New Markets. The Company looks to leverage its quality products, global infrastructure,
channel relationships and selling capabilities to effectively enter new markets, many of which are
fragmented and populated with smaller competitors. The Company is also considering entering
adjacent markets where its core competencies can be successfully leveraged. The Company reviews its
product and market portfolio on a regular basis through its standardized review process in order to
identify new opportunities.
Expand Geographically. Bradys long-term strategy involves the pursuit of growth opportunities
in a number of markets outside of the United States, including growth in emerging markets where the
future growth rate prospects are believed to exceed those of the more established geographies. The
Company is committed to being in close proximity to its customers and to low-cost global supply
chain capabilities including manufacturing. Brady currently operates in 30 countries and employs
approximately 6,500 people. Of the approximately 6,500 global employees, Asia-Pacific accounts for
43%, with the Americas and Europe employing 36%, and 21% of the workforce, respectively. Brady has
made strategic acquisitions and has invested heavily in its global infrastructure and flexible
manufacturing capacity in order to follow its customers into new geographies. Bradys regional
management structure is a key component in effectively entering and competing in new geographies.
Market/Customer Segmentation and Voice of the Customer. The Company employs a systematic
process to facilitate its goals for growth into new and/or adjacent market spaces and focuses
Company resources on the best and most promising business development opportunities. Market and
customer segmentation identifies fast growing, profitable market segments and the most attractive
customers within these segments, while voice of the customer provides a more complete understanding
of what these customers want and need in terms of products, services, and delivery options.
New Product Development. Through product innovation and development activities, Brady seeks to
introduce new technologies and differentiated products that leverage its capabilities in specialty
materials, printing systems, and die-cutting. The Company continues to invest in research and
development activities, and employs approximately 215 R&D professionals worldwide with the largest
R&D centers located in the United States, China, and Singapore. Amounts incurred for research and
development activities were 3.2%, 3.4%, and 2.8% of sales in fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009,
respectively.
E-Business Expansion. The Company continues to develop and enhance its e-commerce
capabilities in a systematic process to facilitate sales growth over the Internet. This e-business
strategy is part of a more comprehensive multi-channel marketing strategy whereby the Company is
focusing on multiple channels to reach its customers to provide a better overall buying experience.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. The Company intends to continue to make complementary strategic
acquisitions to further its goals of strengthening its market positions and entering new markets,
new geographies and adjacent markets, where Brady competencies can be applied and social, economic
and cultural trends can be positively leveraged. Brady works to drive substantial value creation
through capitalizing on its acquisition and integration acumen.
Improve Productivity
Brady Business Performance System. The Company plans to continue its focus on improving
operating efficiency and customer service, reducing costs, and improving productivity and return on
invested capital. To this end, Brady is continuing the expansion of its Brady Business Performance
System (BBPS) in most of its operations globally. This approach to improving profitability
focuses on strategy deployment, implementing scalable business processes, operational efficiencies
and lean manufacturing principles to drive cost savings, enhance customer service and improve
overall business performance. BBPS started in operations, but its underlying principles have since
been deployed beyond the manufacturing floor to functions such as human resources, information
technology, finance, and sales and marketing.
Global Strategic Sourcing. Through coordinated supply chain management, the Company looks to
increase productivity and efficiency in the process of procuring goods and services ranging from
raw materials and products for resale, to travel and other services, as well as energy,
communication and building lease costs. Bradys strategic sourcing program focuses on improving
vendor performance, reducing both direct and indirect spending, and implementing standard processes
globally.
5
Sales and Marketing Productivity and Effectiveness. The Company continues to focus on
improving the effectiveness and efficiency of its sales and marketing professionals and processes
to better serve our existing customers and prospective customers while better managing our sales
and marketing costs through common processes for sales and marketing activities.
General and Administrative Productivity and Effectiveness. The Company is focusing on the
automation, standardization, and simplification of its back-office activities including finance,
information technology, human resources, and other functions. This includes the centralization of
certain functions in global and regional shared-service centers to better leverage talent and gain
economies of scale.
Products
The Company is largely vertically integrated by designing, developing, distributing, and
producing the majority of its products internally. Brady materials are developed and manufactured
out of a variety of films, many of which are coated by Brady, for applications in the following
markets: electronic, industrial, electrical, utility, laboratory, safety and security. Brady also
manufactures specialty tapes and related products that are characterized by high-performance
printable top coats and adhesives, most of which are formulated by the Company, to meet
high-tolerance requirements of the industries in which they are used. The Company also designs,
develops and manufactures most of its printing and software systems.
The Company has thousands of stock and custom products which consist of complete
identification systems and other products used to create a safer work environment, improve
operating efficiencies, and increase the utilization of assets through tracking and inventory
process controls. Major product categories include: facility and safety signs, identification tags
and markers, pipe and valve markers, asset identification labels, lockout/tagout products, security
and traffic control products, printing systems and software for creating safety and regulatory
labels and signs, spill control and clean-up products, wire and cable markers, high-performance
labels, laboratory identification labels and printing systems, stand-alone printing systems,
bar-code and other software, automatic identification and data collection systems, personal
identification products, and precision die-cut solutions.
Some of the Companys stock products were originally designed, developed, distributed, and
manufactured as custom products for a specific application. However, such products have frequently
created wide industry acceptance and have become stock items offered by the Company through direct
marketing and distributor sales channels. The Companys most significant types of products are
described below.
Safety and Facility Identification
Informational signs, tags and labels, and do-it-yourself printers for use in a broad range of
industrial, utility, commercial, governmental and institutional applications. These products are
either self-adhesive or mechanically mounted, designed for both indoor and outdoor use and are
manufactured to meet standards issued by the National Safety Council, OSHA and a variety of
industry associations in the United States and abroad. The Companys sign products include
admittance, directional and exit signs; electrical hazard warnings; energy conservation messages;
fire protection and fire equipment signs; hazardous waste labels; hazardous and toxic material
warning signs; transformers and power pole markers; personal hazard warnings; housekeeping and
operational warnings; pictograms; radiation and laser signs; safety practices signs and regulatory
markings; employment law posters; and photo luminescent (glow-in-the-dark) products.
Pipe markers and valve tags including plastic or metal, self-adhesive or mechanically applied
stock or custom-designed pieces for the identification of pipes and control valves in the
mechanical contractor and process industry markets. These products are designed to help identify
and provide information as to the contents, direction of flow and special hazardous properties of
materials contained in piping systems, and to facilitate repair or maintenance of the systems.
Asset-identification products that are an important part of an effective asset-management
program in a wide variety of markets. These include self-adhesive or mechanically mounted labels or
tags made of aluminum, brass, stainless steel, polycarbonate, vinyl, polyester, mylar and paper.
These products are also offered in tamper-evident varieties, and can be custom designed to ensure
brand protection from counterfeiting.
Lockout/tagout products under OSHA regulations, all energy sources must be locked out
while machines are being serviced or maintained to prevent accidental engagement and injury. The
Companys products allow its customers to comply with these regulations and to ensure worker safety
for a wide variety of energy and fluid transmission systems and operating machinery.
Warehouse identification products including labels, tags, and printing systems used to locate
and identify inventory in storage facilities such as warehouses, factories, stockrooms and other
industrial facilities.
6
Security and traffic control products including a variety of security seals, parking permits
and wristbands designed for visitor control in financial, governmental, educational and commercial
facilities including meeting and convention sites. The Company also offers a wide variety of
traffic control devices including traffic signs, directional and warning signs, parking tags and
permits, barriers, cones and other products including barricading, visual warning systems,
floor-marking products, safety badges, and first aid cabinets/kits, among others.
Spill control and clean-up products including natural and synthetic sorbent materials in a
variety of shapes, sizes and configurations; spill kits, containment booms, industrial rugs,
absorbing pillows and pads, barrier spill matting and granular absorbents; and other products for
absorbing and controlling chemical, oil-based and water-based spills.
Wire and Cable Identification
Brady manufactures a broad range of wire and cable-marking products, including labels,
sleeves, printers and software that allow customers to create their own labels, and printers to
print and apply them. These products mark and identify wires, cables and their termination points
to facilitate manufacturing, construction, repair or maintenance of equipment, and data
communication and electrical wiring systems used in virtually every industrial, power and
communication market.
High Performance Identification
Brady produces a complete line of label materials and printing systems to meet customers
needs for identification requirements for product identification, brand protection labeling,
tamper-evident labeling, work in process labeling, finished product identification and bar coding
that perform under harsh or demanding conditions. Brady prints stock and custom labels and also
sells unprinted materials to enable customers to print their own labels.
Precision Die-Cut Parts
The Company manufactures customized precision die-cut products that are used to seal,
insulate, protect, shield or provide other mechanical performance properties in the assembly of
electronic, telecommunications and other equipment, including mobile phones, hard disk drives,
computers, displays, and other devices. Solutions not only include the materials and converting,
but also automatic placement and other value-added services. The Company also provides converting
services to the medical market for materials used in in-vitro diagnostic kits, patient monitoring,
and bandaging applications.
People Identification
The Company offers identification systems and products including photo ID card systems that
combine digital imaging and other technologies to positively identify people; self-expiring name
tags and software for visitor and employee identification. In addition, the Company provides asset
control software identification accessories including lanyards, badge holders, badge reels and
attachments, providing security to companies, employees, and company assets.
Software and Printer Systems
The Company also designs and produces software for inspection automation, industrial
thermal-transfer printers and other electromechanical devices to serve the growing and specialized
needs of customers in a wide variety of markets. Industrial labeling systems, software, tapes,
ribbons and label stocks provide customers with the resources and flexibility to produce signs and
labels on demand at their site. The Company also offers poster printers, cutting systems,
laminators and supplies to education and training markets.
Marketing and Sales
Brady seeks to offer high quality products with rapid response and superior service so that it
can provide solutions to customers that are better, faster and more economical than those available
from the Companys competitors. The Company markets and sells its products domestically and
internationally through multiple channels including distributors, direct sales, mail-order-catalog
marketing, and electronic access through the Internet. The Company has long-standing relationships
with a broad range of electrical, safety, industrial and other domestic and international
distributors. The Companys sales force seeks to establish and foster ongoing relationships with
the end-users and distributors by providing technical application and product expertise.
7
The Company also direct markets certain products and those of other manufacturers by catalog
sales, outbound telemarketing, and electronic access via the Internet in both domestic and
international markets. Such products include industrial and facility identification products,
safety and regulatory-compliance products and original equipment manufacturer component products,
among others. Catalogs are distributed in the United States of America, Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, and include foreign language catalogs.
Brands
The Company goes to market under a variety of brand names. The Brady brand includes
high-performance labels, wire identification products, printers, software, safety and facility
identification products, lock-out/tag-out products, people identification products, precision
die-cut parts and specialty materials. Other die-cut materials are marketed as Balkhausen products.
Safety and facility identification products are also marketed under the Safety Signs Service brand,
with some lockout/tagout products offered under the Scafftag brands. In addition, identification
products for the utility industry are marketed under the Electromark brand and spill-control
products are marketed under the Sorbent Products Company and D.A.W.G. brands; poster printers and
cutting systems for education and government markets are offered under the Varitronics brand; wire
identification products are marketed under the Modernotecnica brand and the Carroll brand; and
custom labels and nameplates under the Stickolor brand. Direct Marketing safety and facility
identification products are offered under the Seton, Emedco, Signals, Safetyshop, Clement and
Personnel Concepts names; direct supplies under the Accidental Health and Safety, Trafalgar, and
Securimed brands. Security and identification badges and systems are included in the Temtec,
B.I.G., Identicard/Identicam, STOPware, J.A.M. Plastics, PromoVision, Brady People ID, and Quo-Luck
brands; hand-held regulatory documentation systems are available under the Tiscor name.
Manufacturing Process and Raw Materials
The Company manufactures the majority of the products it sells, while purchasing certain items
from other manufacturers. Products manufactured by the Company generally require a high degree of
precision and the application of adhesives with chemical and physical properties suited for
specific uses. The Companys manufacturing processes include compounding, coating, converting,
printing, melt-blown operations, software development and printer design and assembly. The
compounding process involves the mixing of chemical batches for primers, top coatings and
adhesives. The coatings and adhesives are applied to a wide variety of materials including
polyester, polyimide, cloth, paper, metal and metal foil. The converting process may include
embossing, perforating, laminating, die cutting, slitting, and printing or marking the materials as
required.
The Company produces the majority of its pressure sensitive materials through vertically
integrated manufacturing processes. These integrated manufacturing processes permit greater
flexibility to meet customer needs in product design and manufacture, and an improved ability to
provide specialized products designed to meet the needs of specific applications. Bradys
manufacturing processes and inventory controls are designed to attain profitability in small orders
by emphasizing flexibility and the optimal utilization of assets through quick turnaround and
delivery, balanced with optimization of lot sizes. Many of the Companys manufacturing facilities
have received ISO 9001, 13485, or 14001 certification.
The materials used in the products manufactured by the Company consist primarily of plastic
sheets and films, paper, metal and metal foil, cloth, fiberglass, polypropylene, inks, dyes,
adhesives, pigments, natural and synthetic rubber, organic chemicals, polymers, solvents and
electronic components and subassemblies. In addition, the Company purchases finished products for
resale. The Company purchases raw materials, components and finished products from many suppliers.
Overall, the Company is not dependent upon any single supplier for its most critical base materials
or components; however the Company has chosen in certain situations to sole source materials,
components or finished items for design or cost reasons. As a result, disruptions in supply could
have an impact on results for a period of time, but generally these disruptions would simply
require qualification of new suppliers and the disruption would be modest. In certain instances,
the qualification process could be more costly or take a longer period of time and in rare
circumstances, such as a global shortage of a critical materials or components, the financial
impact could be significant.
Technology and Product Development
The Company focuses its research and development efforts on material development, printing
systems design and software development. Material development involves the application of surface
chemistry concepts for top coatings and adhesives applied to a variety of base materials. Systems
design integrates materials, embedded software and a variety of printing technologies to form a
complete solution for customer applications or the Companys own production requirements. The
Companys research and development team also supports production and marketing efforts by providing
application and technical expertise.
8
The Company possesses patents covering various aspects of adhesive chemistry, electronic
circuitry, printing systems for wire markers, systems for aligning letters and patterns, and
visually changing paper. Although the Company believes that its patents are a
significant factor in maintaining market position for certain products, technology in the
areas covered by many of the patents is evolving rapidly and may limit the value of such patents.
The Companys business is not dependent on any single patent or group of patents.
The Company conducts much of its research and development activities at the Frederic S. Tobey
Research and Innovation Center (approximately 39,600 sq. ft.) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and its
research and development facilities in Singapore and Beijing, China. The Company spent
approximately $43.0 million, $42.6 million, and $34.2 million during the fiscal years ended July
31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively, on its research and development activities. In fiscal 2011,
approximately 215 employees were engaged in research and development activities for the Company.
Additional research projects were conducted in Company facilities in other locations in the United
States, Europe and Asia and under contract with universities, other institutions and consultants.
The Companys name and its registered trademarks are important to each of its business
segments. In addition, the Company owns other important trademarks applicable to only certain of
its products.
International Operations
In fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, sales from international operations accounted for 64.6%,
63.4%, and 61.8%, respectively, of the Companys sales. Its global infrastructure includes
subsidiaries in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Cayman Islands, China, Denmark, France,
Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, the
Philippines, Poland, Singapore, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, the United
Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The Company also sells through
subsidiaries or sales offices in these countries, with additional sales through a dedicated team of
international sales representatives in Hungary, New Zealand, Russia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The
Company further markets its products to parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and South
America.
Competition
The markets for all of the Companys products are competitive. Brady believes that it is one
of the leading producers in its specific markets of wire markers, safety signs, pipe markers, label
printing systems, and die-cut. Brady competes for business principally on the basis of production
capabilities, engineering, and research and development capabilities, materials expertise, its
global footprint, global account management where needed, customer service and price. Product
quality is determined by factors such as suitability of component materials for various
applications, adhesive properties, graphics quality, durability, product consistency and
workmanship. Competition in many of its product markets is highly fragmented, ranging from smaller
companies offering only one or a few types of products, to some of the worlds major adhesive and
electrical product companies offering some competing products as part of their overall product
lines. A number of Bradys competitors are larger than the Company and have greater resources.
Notwithstanding the resources of these competitors, management believes that Brady provides a
broader range of identification solutions than any of them, and that its global infrastructure is a
significant competitive advantage in serving large multi-national customers.
Backlog
As of July 31, 2011, the amount of the Companys backlog orders believed to be firm was $27.2
million. This compares with $35.3 million and $27.5 million of backlog orders as of July 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the backlog from July 31, 2010 to July 31, 2011 was
primarily due to the larger amount of backlog related to a one-time brand protection order in the
Americas Brady business in the prior year. Average delivery time for the Companys orders varies
from same-day delivery to one month, depending on the type of product, customer request or demand,
and whether the product is stock or custom-designed and manufactured. The Companys backlog does
not provide much visibility for future business.
Environment
The manufacturing processes for the Companys adhesive-based products utilize certain
evaporative solvents, which, unless controlled, would be vented into the atmosphere. Emissions of
these substances are regulated at the federal, state and local levels. The Company has implemented
a number of systems and procedures to reduce atmospheric emissions and/or to recover solvents.
Management believes the Company is substantially in compliance with all environmental regulations.
9
Employees
As of September 20, 2011, the Company employed approximately 6,500 individuals. Brady has
never experienced a material work stoppage due to a labor dispute and considers its relations with
employees to be good. The mix of employees is changing as the Company employs more people in
developing countries where wage rates are lower and employee turnover tends to be higher than in
developed countries.
Acquisitions and Divestitures
Information about the Companys acquisitions and divestitures is provided in Note 2 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
(d) Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(e) Information Available on the Internet
The Companys Corporate Internet address is http://www.bradycorp.com. The Company makes
available, free of charge, on or through its Internet website copies of its Annual Report on Form
10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to all such
reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC. The Company is not including the information contained on or available
through its website as part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Before making an investment decision with respect to the Companys stock, you should carefully
consider the risks set forth below and all other information contained in this report. If any of
the events contemplated by the following risks actually occur, then the Companys business,
financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, or liquidity could be materially affected.
The Companys financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or liquidity may be
adversely affected by a prolonged economic downturn or economic uncertainty.
The Companys business and operating results have been and will continue to be affected by
global economic conditions. As global economic conditions deteriorate or economic uncertainty
continues, our customers and potential customers may experience deterioration of their businesses,
which may result in the delay or cancellation of plans to purchase our products. Our sensitivity to
economic cycles and any related fluctuations in the businesses of our customers or potential
customers may have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows,
or liquidity.
Demand for the Companys products may be susceptible to fluctuations in the major markets
served that may cause volatility in its results of operations, cash flows, and liquidity.
Sales of the Companys products may be susceptible to changes in market conditions. The
Companys business in the safety and facility identification and wire and cable identification
product lines tends to vary with the nominal GDP of the local economies in which the Company
manufactures and sells. As a result, in periods of economic contraction, the business is likely to
decline. In the precision die-cut and high performance identification product lines, the Company
may be adversely affected by reduced demand for products due to downturns in the global economy as
this is a more volatile business. This can result in higher degrees of volatility in the Companys
net sales, results of operations, cash flows, and liquidity. These more volatile markets include,
but are not limited to, mobile telecommunication devices, hard disk drives and electronics in
personal computers and other electronic devices.
10
Failure to meet certain financial covenants required by our debt agreements may adversely
affect our assets, financial position, cash flows, and liquidity.
The Companys debt and revolving loan agreements require it to maintain certain financial
covenants. The June 2004, February 2006, March 2007 and May 2010 debt agreements require the
Company to maintain a ratio of debt to the trailing twelve months earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as defined in the debt agreements, of not more than a 3.5
to 1.0 ratio (leverage ratio). The October 2006 revolving loan agreement, as amended and extended
in May 2008, requires the Company to maintain a ratio of debt to trailing twelve months EBITDA, as
defined by the debt agreement, of not more than a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio. Additionally, the revolving
loan agreement requires the trailing twelve months earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to
interest expense of not less than a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio (interest expense coverage). The October 2006
revolving loan agreement, as amended and extended in May 2008, also requires that the aggregate net
book value of the assets sold or otherwise disposed of by the Company and its subsidiaries, as
defined in the agreement, in any fiscal year of the Company shall not exceed 15% of consolidated
tangible net worth.
If we breach any of these restrictions or covenants and do not obtain a waiver from the
lenders, then, subject to applicable cure periods, the outstanding indebtedness (and any other
indebtedness with cross-default provisions) could be declared immediately due and payable, which
would adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
|
|
An increase in the Companys level of debt could adversely affect our financial health. |
An increase in the Companys level of debt, which historically has occurred to finance
acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes, could adversely impact: obligations under
existing debt agreements; ability to obtain additional financing for future growth; future interest
rates; cash flows available to fund new product development; capital expenditures; working capital
and other general corporate activities; and the Companys flexibility in planning and reacting to
changes in the business.
The Companys net earnings could be affected by changes in tax legislation or tax rates.
Additionally, audits by taxing authorities could result in tax payments for prior periods.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and in many non-U.S. jurisdictions. As
such the Companys net earnings are subject to risk due to changing tax laws and tax rates around
the world. At any point in time, there are a number of tax proposals at various stages of
legislation throughout the globe. While it is impossible for us to predict whether some or all of
these proposals will be enacted, it is likely they will have an impact on our net earnings.
The Companys tax filings are subject to audit by U.S. federal, state and local tax
authorities and by non-U.S. tax authorities. If these audits result in payments or assessments
different from our reserves, our future net earnings may be adversely impacted.
The Company reviews the probability of the realization of its deferred tax assets on a
quarterly basis based on forecasts of taxable income in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. As
part of this review, the Company utilizes historical results, projected future operating results,
eligible carry-forward periods, tax planning opportunities, and other relevant considerations.
Adverse changes in profitability and financial outlook in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions,
or changes in its geographic footprint may require changes in the valuation allowances to reduce
its deferred tax assets. Such changes could result in material non-cash expenses in the period in
which the changes are made and could have a material impact on the Companys net earnings.
The Company may be adversely impacted by an inability to identify, complete and integrate
acquisitions.
Our historical growth has included, and our future growth strategy includes, acquisitions. The
Company may not be able to identify acquisition targets or successfully complete acquisitions in
the future due to the absence of quality companies, economic conditions, or price expectations from
sellers. If the Company is unable to complete additional acquisitions, its growth may be limited.
11
Additionally, as the Company grows through acquisitions, it will continue to place significant
demands on its management, operational and financial resources. Recent and future acquisitions will
require integration of operations, sales and marketing, information technology, finance and
administrative operations. The successful integration of acquisitions will require substantial
attention from the Companys management and the management of the acquired businesses, which could
decrease the time management, has to serve and attract customers. The Company cannot assure that it
will be able to successfully integrate these recent or any future acquisitions, that these
acquisitions will operate profitably or that it will be able to achieve the financial or
operational success expected from the acquisitions. The Companys financial condition, cash flows
and operational results could be adversely affected if it does not successfully integrate the newly
acquired businesses or if its other businesses suffer on account of the increased focus on the
newly acquired businesses.
If the Company fails to develop new products or its customers do not accept the new products
it develops, the Companys business could be adversely affected.
Development of proprietary products is key to the success of the Companys core growth and
reasonable gross profit margins now and in the future. Therefore, the Company must continue to
develop new and innovative products and acquire and retain the necessary intellectual property
rights in these products on an ongoing basis. If it fails to make innovations, launches products
with quality problems, or the market does not accept its new products, then the Companys financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, and liquidity could be adversely affected. The
Company continues to invest in the development and marketing of new products. These expenditures do
not always result in products that will be accepted by the market. Failure to develop successful
new products may also cause its customers to buy from a competitor or may cause the Company to
lower its prices in order to compete. This could have an adverse impact on the Companys
profitability.
The Company operates in competitive markets and may be forced to cut its prices or incur
additional costs to remain competitive, which may have a negative impact on its profitability.
The Company faces substantial competition throughout its entire business, but particularly in
the precision die-cut business. Competition may force the Company to cut its prices or incur
additional costs to remain competitive. The Company competes on the basis of production
capabilities, engineering and R&D capabilities, materials expertise, its global footprint, global
account management where needed, customer service and price. Present or future competitors may have
greater financial, technical or other resources, lower production costs or other pricing
advantages, any of which could put the Company at a disadvantage in the affected business by
threatening its market share or reducing its profit margins. Additionally, in some of its other
businesses, the Companys distributors/customers may seek lower cost sourcing opportunities, which
could cause a loss of business that may adversely impact the Companys revenues.
The global nature of our business exposes us to foreign currency fluctuations that could
adversely affect the Companys sales, profits, and cash balances.
More than 60 percent of the Companys revenues are derived outside the United States. As such,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can have an adverse impact on its sales and profits
as amounts that are measured in foreign currency are translated back to U.S. dollars. Any increase
in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the value of the local currency will adversely
affect operating results from the Companys foreign operations when translated into U.S. dollars.
Similarly, any decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the value of the local
currency will increase operating results in the Companys foreign operations when translated into
U.S. dollars. During fiscal 2011, the weakening U.S. dollar versus the majority of other currencies
increased the Companys sales by $31.1 million.
At July 31, 2011, approximately 69% of the Companys cash and cash equivalents were held
outside the United States. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currency can have an adverse impact
on the Companys cash balances. Any increase in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the
value of various foreign currencies will have a negative impact on cash balances when translated
into U.S. dollars. Weakening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies will have a positive
impact on cash balances when foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars. During fiscal
2011, the weakening U.S. dollar versus the majority of other currencies increased the Companys
cash and cash equivalents by $22.0 million.
12
The Companys goodwill or other intangible assets may become impaired, which may negatively
impact the Companys profitability.
The Company has a substantial amount of goodwill and other intangible assets on its balance
sheet as a result of its acquisitions. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had $800.3 million of
goodwill on its balance sheet, representing the excess of the total purchase price for its
acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets it acquired, and $90.0 million of other
intangible assets, primarily representing the fair value of the customer relationships, patents and
trademarks it acquired in its acquisitions. At July 31, 2011, goodwill and other intangible assets
represented approximately 48% of the Companys total assets. The Company evaluates goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are present based on the
fair value of each operating segment. It assesses the impairment of other intangible assets on an
annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are present based upon the expected future
cash flows of the respective assets. These valuations include managements estimates of sales,
profitability, cash flow generation, capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital
expenditures, and other assumptions. Significant negative industry or economic trends, disruptions
to the Companys business, inability to effectively integrate acquired businesses, unexpected
significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets or in entity structure, and
divestitures may adversely impact the assumptions used in the valuations. If the estimated fair
value of the Companys operating segments change in future periods, it may be required to record an
impairment charge related to goodwill or other intangible assets, which would have the effect of
decreasing its earnings in such period.
The Company has a concentration of business with several large key customers and distributors
and loss of one or more of these customers could significantly affect the Companys results of
operations, cash flows, and liquidity.
While the Company has a broad customer base and no individual customer represents 5% or more
of total net sales, several of the Companys large key customers in the precision die-cut business
together comprise a significant portion of its revenues. Additionally, the Company does business
with several large distribution companies. The Companys dependence on these large customers makes
its relationships with these customers important to its business. The Company cannot guarantee that
it will be able to maintain these relationships and retain this business in the future. Because
these large customers account for a significant portion of the Companys revenues, they possess
relatively greater capacity to negotiate a reduction in the prices the Company charges for its
products. If the Company is unable to provide products to its customers at the quality and prices
acceptable to them or adapt to technological changes, some of its customers may in the future elect
to shift some or all of this business to competitors or to substitute other manufacturers
products. If one of the Companys key customers consolidates, is acquired by another company or
loses market share, the result of that event may have an adverse impact on the Companys business.
The loss of or reduction of business from one or more of these large key customers could have a
material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and
liquidity.
The Company increasingly conducts a sizable amount of its manufacturing outside of the United
States, which may present additional risks to its business.
A significant portion of the Companys sales are attributable to products manufactured outside
of the United States. More than half of the Companys approximately 6,500 employees and more than
half of its manufacturing locations are outside of the United States. The Companys international
operations are generally subject to various risks including political, economic and societal
instability, the imposition of trade restrictions, local labor market conditions, the effects of
income taxes, and differences in business practices. The Company may incur increased costs and
experience delays or disruptions in product deliveries and payments in connection with
international manufacturing and sales that could cause loss of revenue. Unfavorable changes in the
political, regulatory and business climate in countries where the Company has operations could have
a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows
Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations could adversely affect the Companys
business.
The Companys facilities and operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations relating
to climate change, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling of hazardous materials and
wastes, manufacturing and disposal of certain materials, and regulations otherwise relating to
health, safety and the protection of the environment. The Companys products may also be governed
by regulations in the countries where they are sold. As a result, the Company may need to devote
management time or expend significant resources on compliance, and has incurred and will continue
to incur capital and other expenditures to comply with these regulations. Any significant costs may
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Further, these laws and regulations are constantly evolving and it is impossible to predict
accurately the effect they may have upon the Companys financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
13
The Companys businesses are subject to regulation; failure to comply with those regulations
could adversely affect its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and reputation.
In addition to the environmental regulations noted above, the Companys businesses are subject
to extensive regulation by U.S. and non-U.S. governmental and self-regulatory entities at the
federal, state and local levels, including the following:
The Company is required to comply with various import laws and export control and economic
sanctions laws, which may affect its transactions with certain customers, business partners and
other persons and dealings with or between its employees and subsidiaries. In certain
circumstances, export control and economic sanctions regulations may prohibit the export of certain
products, services and technologies, and in other circumstances the Company may be required to
obtain an export license before exporting the controlled item.
The Company also has agreements relating to the sale of products to government entities or
supply products to companies who resell these products to government entities and are subject to
various statutes and regulations that apply to companies doing business with the government. The
laws governing government contracts differ from the laws governing private contracts. The Company
is also subject to investigation and audit for compliance with the requirements of government
contracts, including requirements related to procurement integrity, export control, employment
practices, the accuracy of records and the recording of costs. A failure to comply with these
requirements might result in suspension of these contracts and suspension or debarment from
government contracting or subcontracting.
The Company cannot provide assurance that its internal controls and compliance systems will
always protect the Company from acts committed by the Companys employees, agents or business
partners that would violate U.S. and/or non-U.S. laws, including the laws governing payments to
government officials, bribery, fraud, anti-kickback and false claims rules, competition, export and
import compliance, money laundering and data privacy. Any such improper actions could subject the
Company to civil or criminal investigations in the U.S. and in other jurisdictions, could lead to
substantial civil or criminal, monetary and non-monetary penalties and related shareholder lawsuits
and could damage the Companys reputation.
The Company may be unable to successfully complete its restructuring plans to reduce costs and
increase efficiencies in its businesses and, therefore, it may not achieve projected financial
statement benefits.
The Company continues to implement several measures to address its cost structure. Successful
implementation of such initiatives is critical to the Companys future competitiveness and its
ability to improve profitability. Further actions to reduce the Companys cost structure and the
charges related to these actions may have a material effect on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
The Company currently operates 55 manufacturing or distribution facilities in the following
regions:
Americas: Thirteen are located in the United States; three in Brazil, two in Mexico; and one in
Canada.
Europe: Four each located in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Germany; three in France; and one
each in the Netherlands, Italy, Norway, Poland, and Sweden.
Asia-Pacific: Seven are located in China; three in Australia; and one each in Japan, Thailand,
Singapore, India, South Korea, and Malaysia.
The Companys present operating facilities contain a total of approximately 3.1 million square
feet of space, of which approximately 2.1 million square feet is leased. The Company believes that
its equipment and facilities are modern, well maintained and adequate for present needs.
14
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
The Company is, and may in the future be, party to litigation arising in the normal course of
business. The Company is not currently a party to any material pending legal proceedings in which
management believes the ultimate resolution would have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
15
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
(a) Market Information
Brady Corporation Class A Nonvoting Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol BRC. The following table sets forth the range of high and low daily closing sales prices
for the Companys class A stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for each of the quarters
in the fiscal years ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
4th Quarter |
|
$ |
38.49 |
|
|
$ |
29.60 |
|
|
$ |
34.75 |
|
|
$ |
24.37 |
|
|
$ |
29.41 |
|
|
$ |
21.33 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
$ |
37.71 |
|
|
$ |
33.37 |
|
|
$ |
35.28 |
|
|
$ |
27.19 |
|
|
$ |
23.08 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
$ |
33.78 |
|
|
$ |
30.83 |
|
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
$ |
26.77 |
|
|
$ |
31.07 |
|
|
$ |
16.38 |
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
31.33 |
|
|
$ |
25.35 |
|
|
$ |
33.06 |
|
|
$ |
27.08 |
|
|
$ |
39.68 |
|
|
$ |
25.18 |
|
There is no trading market for the Companys Class B Voting Common Stock.
(b) Holders
As of September 20, 2011, there were 808 Class A Common Stock shareholders of record and
approximately 7,500 beneficial shareholders. There are three Class B Common Stock shareholders.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, the Companys Board of Directors authorized share
repurchase plans for the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. The share repurchase plans were
implemented by purchasing shares in the open market or privately negotiated transactions, with
repurchased shares available for use in connection with the Companys stock-based plans and for
other corporate purposes. The Company reacquired approximately 102,067, 1,345,000 and 1,349,000
shares of its Class A Common Stock for $2.5 million, $40.3 million and $42.2 million in fiscal
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in connection with its stock repurchase plans. The Company did
not reacquire any shares in fiscal 2011. As of July 31, 2011, there remained 204,133 shares to
purchase in connection with this share repurchase plan. On September 9, 2011, the Companys Board
of Directors authorized a share buyback program for up to an additional 2 million shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock.
(d) Dividends
The Company has historically paid quarterly dividends on outstanding common stock. Before any
dividend may be paid on the Class B Common Stock, holders of the Class A Common Stock are entitled
to receive an annual, noncumulative cash dividend of $0.01665 per share (subject to adjustment in
the event of future stock splits, stock dividends or similar events involving shares of Class A
Common Stock). Thereafter, any further dividend in that fiscal year must be paid on all shares of
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on an equal basis. The Companys revolving credit
agreement restricts the amount of certain types of payments, including dividends that can be made
annually to $50 million plus 75% of the consolidated net income excluding all extraordinary
non-cash items for the prior fiscal year. The Company believes that based on its historic dividend
practice, this restriction will not impede it in following a similar dividend practice in the
future.
During the two most recent fiscal years and for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company
declared the following dividends per share on its Class A and Class B Common Stock for the years
ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
1st Qtr |
|
|
1st Qtr |
|
|
2nd Qtr |
|
|
3rd Qtr |
|
|
4th Qtr |
|
|
1st Qtr |
|
|
2nd Qtr |
|
|
3rd Qtr |
|
|
4th Qtr |
|
Class A |
|
$ |
0.185 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
Class B |
|
|
0.16835 |
|
|
|
0.16335 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.15835 |
|
|
|
0.175 |
|
|
|
0.175 |
|
|
|
0.175 |
|
16
(e) Common Stock Price Performance Graph
The graph below shows a comparison of the cumulative return over the last five fiscal years
had $100 been invested at the close of business on July 31, 2006, in each of Brady Corporation
Class A Common Stock, The Standard & Poors (S&P) 500 index, the Standard and Poors SmallCap 600
index, and the Russell 2000 index.
Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return*
Among Brady Corporation, The S&P 500 Index,
The S&P SmallCap 600 Index and The Russell 2000 Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on 7/31/06 in stock or index including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal
year ended July 31. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/2006 |
|
|
7/31/2007 |
|
|
7/31/2008 |
|
|
7/31/2009 |
|
|
7/31/2010 |
|
|
7/31/2011 |
|
Brady Corporation |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
105.28 |
|
|
|
112.28 |
|
|
|
92.53 |
|
|
|
89.61 |
|
|
|
104.98 |
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
116.13 |
|
|
|
103.25 |
|
|
|
82.64 |
|
|
|
94.08 |
|
|
|
112.56 |
|
S&P SmallCap 600 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
114.10 |
|
|
|
104.66 |
|
|
|
84.49 |
|
|
|
100.69 |
|
|
|
125.58 |
|
Russell 2000 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
112.13 |
|
|
|
104.61 |
|
|
|
82.91 |
|
|
|
98.20 |
|
|
|
121.68 |
|
Copyright (C) 2011, Standard & Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
reserved.
17
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Years Ended July 31, 2007 through 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Data (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,208,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,523,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,362,631 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
656,196 |
|
|
|
623,297 |
|
|
|
577,583 |
|
|
|
744,195 |
|
|
|
657,044 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
43,001 |
|
|
|
42,621 |
|
|
|
34,181 |
|
|
|
40,607 |
|
|
|
35,954 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
441,815 |
|
|
|
435,906 |
|
|
|
397,180 |
|
|
|
495,904 |
|
|
|
449,103 |
|
Restructuring charge (2) |
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
15,314 |
|
|
|
25,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
494,004 |
|
|
|
493,841 |
|
|
|
457,210 |
|
|
|
536,511 |
|
|
|
485,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
162,192 |
|
|
|
129,456 |
|
|
|
120,373 |
|
|
|
207,684 |
|
|
|
171,987 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income net |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,124 |
) |
|
|
(21,222 |
) |
|
|
(24,901 |
) |
|
|
(26,385 |
) |
|
|
(22,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other expense |
|
|
(18,134 |
) |
|
|
(20,054 |
) |
|
|
(23,101 |
) |
|
|
(21,497 |
) |
|
|
(20,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
144,058 |
|
|
|
109,402 |
|
|
|
97,272 |
|
|
|
186,187 |
|
|
|
151,928 |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
35,406 |
|
|
|
27,446 |
|
|
|
27,150 |
|
|
|
53,999 |
|
|
|
42,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
|
$ |
132,188 |
|
|
$ |
109,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Share (Diluted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A nonvoting |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
Class B voting |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
Cash Dividends on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Class B common stock |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Balance Sheet at July 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
456,406 |
|
|
$ |
375,184 |
|
|
$ |
286,955 |
|
|
$ |
390,524 |
|
|
$ |
303,359 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,861,505 |
|
|
|
1,746,231 |
|
|
|
1,583,267 |
|
|
|
1,850,513 |
|
|
|
1,698,857 |
|
Long-term obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
331,914 |
|
|
|
382,940 |
|
|
|
346,457 |
|
|
|
457,143 |
|
|
|
478,575 |
|
Stockholders investment |
|
|
1,156,192 |
|
|
|
1,005,027 |
|
|
|
951,092 |
|
|
|
1,021,808 |
|
|
|
891,012 |
|
Cash Flow Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
167,350 |
|
|
|
165,238 |
|
|
|
126,645 |
|
|
|
225,554 |
|
|
|
136,018 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
|
|
54,851 |
|
|
|
60,587 |
|
|
|
53,856 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(20,532 |
) |
|
|
(26,296 |
) |
|
|
(24,027 |
) |
|
|
(26,407 |
) |
|
|
(51,940 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial data has been impacted by the acquisitive nature of the Company as one, three, two,
and seven acquisitions were completed in fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, 2008, and
2007, respectively. There were no acquisitions in fiscal 2009. See Note 2 in Item 8 for
further information on the acquisitions that were completed. |
|
(2) |
|
In fiscal 2009, in response to the global economic downturn, the Company initiated several
measures to address its cost structure, including the reduction in its workforce and decreased
discretionary spending. The Company continued certain of these measures during fiscal 2011 and
2010. |
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
In fiscal 2011, the Company posted sales of $1,339.6 million and net income of $108.7 million,
an increase of 6.4% and 32.6%, respectively, from fiscal 2010. Of the 6.4% increase in sales,
organic sales increased 2.9%, the effects of fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate
financial results into the United States dollar increased sales by 2.5%, and a fiscal 2011
acquisition, net of divestiture, increased sales by 1.0%. Regionally, fiscal 2011 sales in the
Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific increased 4.8%, 6.5%, and 9.0% , respectively, as compared to
fiscal 2010.
18
Net income for fiscal 2011 increased 32.6% to $108.7 million or $2.04 per diluted share of
Class A Common Stock, compared to $82.0 million, or $1.55 per diluted share of Class A Common Stock
in fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 net income before restructuring related expenses was $115.2 million, or
$2.16 per diluted share of Class A Common Stock compared to 2010 net income before restructuring
related expenses of $93.4 million, or $1.76 per diluted share of Class A Common Stock. The
improvement in earnings was driven by organic sales growth, the positive impacts of the Companys
ongoing process improvement initiatives and restructuring activities as well as benefits from
foreign currency translation.
In fiscal 2011, the Company generated $167.4 million of cash from operations, an increase
of $2.2 million from the prior fiscal year. The increase in fiscal 2011 net income was mainly
offset by improvements in working capital in the prior year.
Results of Operations
Year Ended July 31, 2011, Compared to Year Ended July 31, 2010
The comparability of the operating results for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 to July
31, 2010, has been impacted by the following acquisitions and divestitures completed in fiscal
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition: |
|
Segment |
|
Date Completed |
ID Warehouse
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Divestiture: |
|
Segment |
|
Date Completed |
Teklynx
|
|
Americas Europe
|
|
December 2010 |
Fiscal 2011 sales increased $80.5 million, or 6.4% from fiscal 2010. The 6.4% increase in
sales consisted of 2.9% growth in organic sales, 2.5% growth due to the effects of the foreign
currency translation, and 1.0% growth due to an acquisition net of divesture.
Organic sales, defined as sales in the Companys existing core businesses and regions
(exclusive of acquisitions owned less than one year, divestitures, and foreign currency translation
effects), were up 2.9% compared to fiscal 2010. Regionally, fiscal 2011 organic sales in
the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific increased 3.2%, 4.7%, and 0.4%, respectively, as compared to
fiscal 2010. The organic sales increase experienced in the Americas was due primarily to the strong
Brady brand sales growth and new products positively received by endusers and distributors. The
increase in Europes organic sales was broad-based with growth in both the Brady business and
Direct Marketing business. Geographically, sales were weak in the United Kingdom, offsetting
strength in other European markets. Organic sales in the Asia-Pacific segment remained relatively
flat. The segments on-going customer base diversification in the mobile handset and other adjacent
markets offset the reduced demand from one of our largest mobile handset customers.
The acquisition net of the divestiture listed above increased sales by $12.7 million or 1.0%
in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010. The currency growth reflects fluctuations in the
exchange rates used to translate financial results into the United States Dollar which increased
sales by $31.1 million or 2.5% for the year.
The gross margin as a percentage of sales declined to 49.0% in fiscal 2011 from 49.5% in
fiscal 2010. The decline in gross margin as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the
increased costs of raw materials which the company was not able to fully offset through continued
cost reduction activities or price increases. The Company continues to focus on gross margin
improvements through the Brady Business Performance System, lean, and strategic sourcing efforts.
Research and development expenses increased to $43.0 million in fiscal 2011 from $42.6 million
in fiscal 2010, and declined as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2011 to 3.2% compared to 3.4% in
fiscal 2010. The increase in R&D spending was due to the Companys continued commitment to
innovation and new product development. This investment declined as percentage of sales slightly in
fiscal 2011 as a result of the elimination of the R&D expenses incurred by the Companys previously
owned Teklynx business.
19
Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased to $441.8 million in fiscal
2011 as compared to $435.9 million in fiscal 2010. SG&A expenses increased during the fiscal year
mainly due to the fluctuations in exchange rates. The Company divested of its Teklynx business
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $4.4 million, which is included in SG&A. This pre-tax gain was
offset
by the associated transaction-related costs and income tax expense, resulting in a net income
impact of $0.8 million during fiscal 2011. SG&A also increased in fiscal 2011 as a result of the
annual merit increases, and increased advertising campaign expenses. As a percentage of sales,
SG&A declined to 33.0% in fiscal 2011 from 34.6% in fiscal 2010 as the Company continues to reduce
administrative costs through its cost reduction activities including simplifying, standardizing,
and automating processes.
Restructuring charges were $9.2 million and $15.3 million during fiscal 2011 and 2010,
respectively. During fiscal 2010 and 2011, the Company incurred restructuring related costs as a
result of facility consolidations and continued workforce reduction activities. The costs
associated with the workforce reduction primarily include employee separation costs, consisting of
severance pay, outplacement services, medical, and other related benefits for the Companys work
force.
Interest expense increased to $22.1 million from $21.2 million for fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2011, the Company repaid approximately $61.3 million of debt. Interest
expense increased due to a full year of interest being recognized on the May 2010 private
placement, compared to a partial year of interest in 2010. The increase was partially offset by
the lower principal balance under the previously outstanding debt agreements.
Other income and expense increased $2.8 million in fiscal 2011 to $4.0 million from $1.2
million in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the interest income earned on the
Companys money market and depository accounts, in addition to the gains on securities held in
executive deferred compensation plans.
The Companys effective tax rate was 24.6% in fiscal 2011, which was relatively consistent
with the effective tax rate of 25.1% in fiscal 2010. The Company anticipates that its fiscal 2012
effective tax rate will be consistent with prior periods.
Net income for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, increased 32.6% to $108.7 million,
compared to $82.0 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, as a result of the factors noted
above. Net income as a percentage of sales increased to 8.1% from 6.5% for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2011 compared to the prior year. Diluted net income per share increased 31.6% to $2.04
per share for fiscal 2011 compared to $1.55 per share for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010.
Fiscal 2011 and 2010 net income before restructuring related expenses was $115.2 million, or $2.16
per diluted share of Class A Common Stock, and $93.4 million, or $1.76 per diluted share of Class A
Common Stock, respectively.
Year Ended July 31, 2010, Compared to Year Ended July 31, 2009
The comparability of the operating results for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2010 to July
31, 2009, has been impacted by the following acquisitions completed in fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions: |
|
Segment |
|
Date Completed |
Welconstruct Group Limited (Welco)
|
|
Europe
|
|
October 2009 |
Stickolor Industria e Comerciao de Auto Adesivos Ltd (Stickolor)
|
|
Americas
|
|
December 2009 |
Securimed SAS (Securimed)
|
|
Europe
|
|
March 2010 |
Fiscal 2010 sales increased $50.4 million, or 4.2% from fiscal 2009. The 4.2% increase
consisted of 0.2% growth in organic sales, 1.3% growth due to acquisitions, and 2.7% growth
resulting from the effects of foreign currency translation.
Organic sales, defined as sales in the Companys existing core businesses and regions
(exclusive of acquisitions owned less than one year and foreign currency translation effects), were
up 0.2% compared to fiscal 2009. The annual organic sales growth of 0.2% varied significantly by
quarter. In the first quarter of the year the Company experienced a 15.9% decline in organic sales
as the prior year quarter had not yet been impacted by the economic recession. Subsequent to the
first quarter the Company experienced sequential growth over the prior period each quarter.
The acquisitions listed above increased sales by $16.2 million or 1.3% in fiscal 2010. The
currency growth reflects fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate financial results
into the United States Dollar which increased sales by $32.3 million or 2.7% for the year.
The gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 49.5% in fiscal 2010 from 47.8% in
fiscal 2009. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the cost
savings generated from restructuring activities as well as lean and continuous improvement
activities in fiscal 2010 and 2009.
20
Research and development expenses increased to $42.6 million in fiscal 2010 from $34.2 million
in fiscal 2009, and increased as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2010 to 3.4% compared to 2.8% in
fiscal 2009. The increase was due to the Companys continued commitment to investing in new product
development as well as the increased incentive compensation expenses during fiscal 2010.
Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased to $435.9 million in fiscal
2010 as compared to $397.2 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due
to the resumption of payment of certain incentive compensation expenses during fiscal 2010, as well
as the effects of the fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate financial results into
the United States dollar. In fiscal 2009, the Company experienced a reduction in SG&A due to the
elimination of certain incentive compensation plans during the year. As a percentage of sales, SG&A
increased to 34.6% in fiscal 2010 from 32.9% in fiscal 2009.
Restructuring charges were $15.3 and $25.8 million during fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In fiscal 2009, $1.6 million of income tax expense was also incurred related to the anticipated
repayment of certain tax holidays due to site consolidation actions. In response to the global
economic downturn, the Company implemented a plan to reduce its cost structure. During fiscal 2009
and 2010, the Company incurred costs related to the reduction of its workforce and facility
consolidations. Restructuring costs related primarily to employee separation costs, consisting of
severance pay, outplacement services, medical, and other related benefits for the Companys work
force.
Interest expense decreased to $21.2 million from $24.9 million for fiscal 2010 compared to
fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2010, the Company repaid approximately $44.9 million of debt. Interest
expense decreased due to the Companys lower principal balance under the previously outstanding
debt agreements. The decrease was partially offset by additional interest on the May 2010 private
placement, as compared to the prior year.
Other income and expense decreased $0.6 million in fiscal 2010 to $1.2 million from $1.8
million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in foreign exchange gains,
offset by gains on securities held in executive deferred compensation plans.
The Companys effective tax rate was 25.1% for fiscal 2010 compared to 27.9% for fiscal 2009.
The decrease in the Companys effective tax rate during fiscal 2010 was primarily due to the mix of
profits in low and high tax countries as well as positive impacts from foreign and U.S. income tax
audits.
Net income for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, increased 16.9% to $82.0 million, compared
to $70.1 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, as a result of the factors noted above.
Net income as a percentage of sales increased to 6.5% from 5.8% for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2010 compared the same period in the prior year. Diluted net income per share increased 17.4% to
$1.55 per share for fiscal 2010 compared to $1.32 per share for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2009. Fiscal 2010 and 2009 net income before restructuring related expenses was $93.4 million, or
$1.76 per diluted share of Class A Common Stock, and $90.2 million, or $1.71 per diluted share of
Class A Common Stock, respectively.
21
Business Segment Operating Results
The Company is organized and managed on a geographic basis by region. Each of these regions,
Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, has a President that reports directly to the Companys chief
operating decision maker, its Chief Executive Officer. Each region has its own distinct operations,
is managed locally by its own management team, maintains its own financial reports and is evaluated
based on regional segment profit. The Company has determined that these regions comprise its
operating and reportable segments based on the information used by the Chief Executive Officer to
allocate resources and assess performance. Segment results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Americas |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Pacific |
|
|
Regions |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Company |
|
SALES TO EXTERNAL
CUSTOMERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
577,428 |
|
|
$ |
404,955 |
|
|
$ |
357,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
551,185 |
|
|
|
380,121 |
|
|
|
327,790 |
|
|
|
1,259,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259,096 |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
534,440 |
|
|
|
367,156 |
|
|
|
307,106 |
|
|
|
1,208,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,208,702 |
|
SALES GROWTH INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Acquisitions/Divestitures |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Year ended July 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Acquisitions/Divestitures |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
SEGMENT PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
145,516 |
|
|
$ |
112,047 |
|
|
$ |
50,105 |
|
|
$ |
307,668 |
|
|
$ |
(15,742 |
) |
|
$ |
291,926 |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
125,169 |
|
|
|
103,316 |
|
|
|
52,105 |
|
|
|
280,590 |
|
|
|
(14,131 |
) |
|
|
266,459 |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
114,404 |
|
|
|
99,875 |
|
|
|
42,575 |
|
|
|
256,854 |
|
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
|
|
248,902 |
|
NET INCOME RECONCILIATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended: |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total profit for reportable segments |
|
$ |
307,668 |
|
|
$ |
280,590 |
|
|
$ |
256,854 |
|
Corporate and eliminations |
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
|
|
(14,131 |
) |
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
Unallocated amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative costs |
|
|
(120,546 |
) |
|
|
(121,689 |
) |
|
|
(102,680 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(9,188 |
) |
|
|
(15,314 |
) |
|
|
(25,849 |
) |
Investment and other income net |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,124 |
) |
|
|
(21,222 |
) |
|
|
(24,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
144,058 |
|
|
|
109,402 |
|
|
|
97,272 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(35,406 |
) |
|
|
(27,446 |
) |
|
|
(27,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company evaluates short-term segment performance based on segment profit or loss and
customer sales. Corporate long-term performance is evaluated based on shareholder value enhancement
(SVE), which incorporates the cost of capital as a hurdle rate for capital expenditures, new
product development, and acquisitions. Segment profit or loss does not include certain
administrative costs, such as the cost of finance, information technology, human resources, and
executive leadership which are managed as global functions. Restructuring charges, equity
compensation costs, interest, investment and other income and income taxes are also excluded when
evaluating segment performance.
22
Americas
Americas sales increased 4.8% from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011, and increased 3.1% from fiscal
2009 to fiscal 2010. Organic sales grew 3.2% in 2011 and grew 0.1% in 2010. The net impact of the
fiscal 2010 acquisition of Stickolor and the fiscal 2011 divestiture of the Teklynx business
increased sales of the segment by 0.5% and the fluctuations of the exchange rates used to translate
financial results into U.S. dollars increased sales by 1.1% in fiscal 2011. The increase in
organic sales in fiscal 2011 was driven by the broad-based improvements in the segments core
markets in additional to the positive results from the segments sales and marketing productivity
initiatives. The segment continues to focus on the sale of new, differentiated products, growth in
new markets, while continuing to focus on growth in core products and markets.
The annual organic sales growth of 0.1% in fiscal 2010 varied significantly during the year.
In the first quarter the Americas experienced a 15.2% decline in organic sales as the prior year
quarter had not yet been impacted by the economic recession. In the second quarter the Americas
experienced a 4.3% decline in organic sales as the economic recession began in the prior year
quarter. Subsequent to the first half of the year, Americas experienced sequential growth over the
prior period each quarter due to modest improvements in the cable and wire ID, industrial
identification, and safety and facility identification markets. The Companys sales volumes of
sorbent products increased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as a result of the clean-up of the
Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The acquisition of Stickolor increased sales of the segment by 1.4% and
the fluctuations of the exchange rates used to translate financial results into U.S. dollars
increased sales by 1.6% in fiscal 2010.
In the Americas region, segment profit increased 16.3% to $145.5 million in fiscal 2011 from
$125.2 million in fiscal 2010. Segment profit as a percentage of sales increased to 25.2% in 2011
from 22.7% in 2010. This increase was primarily due to the improved gross margin in the segment due
to certain facility consolidation actions, operational and sourcing cost savings projects offset by
higher inflation, in addition to the actions taken in fiscal 2011 to streamline the segments
selling expense structure. Comparing fiscal 2010 to 2009, segment profit increased 9.4% to $125.2
million in fiscal 2010 from $114.4 million in fiscal 2009. Segment profit as a percentage of sales
increased to 22.7% in 2010 from 21.4% in 2009. This increase was primarily due to the segments
commitment to its productivity initiatives including lean manufacturing and strategic sourcing.
Europe
Europe sales increased 6.5% from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011, and increased 3.5% from fiscal
2009 to fiscal 2010. Organic sales increased 4.7% in fiscal 2011 and declined 0.3% in fiscal 2010
as compared to prior years. Segment sales increased 1.2% in fiscal 2011 as a result of the fiscal
2010 acquisitions of Welco and Securimed, net of the fiscal 2011 divestiture of the Teklynx
business. The segments organic sales were positively impacted during fiscal 2011 as a result of
growth in the Brady business and Direct Marketing business in Germany and Southern Europe due to a
combination of improving economies and positive results of sales initiatives, partially offset by
the continued depressed conditions in the United Kingdom. Sales were also positively affected by
fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate financial results into the United States
dollar, which increased sales within the segment by 0.6% in fiscal 2011.
The annual organic sales decline, in fiscal 2010, of 0.3% varied significantly during the
year. In the first quarter Europe experienced a 12.3% decline in organic sales as the prior year
quarter had not yet been impacted by the economic recession. In the second quarter Europe
experienced a 1.6% decline in organic sales as the economic recession began in the prior year
quarter. Subsequent to the first half of the year, Europe experienced sequential growth over the
prior period each quarter. The segments organic sales volumes in direct marketing businesses and
electronic industries improved modestly. The increase was offset by the decline in sales to
governmental and public utilities. The acquisitions of Welco and Securimed in fiscal 2010 increased
sales by 2.4%. Sales were positively affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates used to
translate financial results into the United States dollar, which increased sales within the segment
by 1.4% in fiscal 2010.
In the Europe region, segment profit increased 8.5% to $112.0 million in fiscal 2011 from
$103.3 million in fiscal 2010. Segment profit as a percentage of sales increased to 27.7% in fiscal
2011 from 27.2% in fiscal 2010 and 2009. The increase in the segments profit was mainly due to
the increased sales volumes in addition to the continued efforts to streamline selling expenses
through the Companys strategic initiatives. The segment maintained its segment profit as a
percentage of sales in fiscal 2010 and was able to offset the increased expenses with cost savings
initiatives put in place in fiscal 2009 and 2010.
23
Asia-Pacific
Asia-Pacific sales increased 9.0% from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011, and sales increased 6.7%
from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010.
Organic sales increased 0.4% and 0.8% in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively as compared to prior
years. Foreign currency translation positively impacted the segments sales by 6.9% and 5.9% in
fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, as compared to prior years. Overall, Asia-Pacific organic
sales were relatively flat in fiscal 2011. Increased sales from the segments on-going customer
base diversification in the mobile handset and other adjacent markets offset the reduced demand
from one of our largest mobile handset customers.
The fiscal 2010 annual organic sales growth of 0.8% varied significantly during the year. In
the first quarter Asia experienced a 20.4% decline in organic sales as the prior year quarter had
not yet been impacted by the economic recession. In the second quarter Asia experienced a 25.7%
growth in organic sales as the impact of the economic recession in the prior quarter was offset by
a heightened focus on high end mobile electronics and strong growth in the data storage market. In
the third and fourth quarters Asia experienced growth of 9.4% and 5.2%, respectively. The increase
in organic sales in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to the success in higher-end solutions in both
the mobile electronics and computer and storage markets.
In the Asia-Pacific region, segment profit declined 3.8% to $50.1 million in fiscal 2011 from
$52.1 million in fiscal 2010. Segment profit as a percentage of sales declined to 14.0% in fiscal
2011 from 15.9% in fiscal 2010. The decline in the profit in fiscal 2011 was the result of
relatively flat organic sales, continued price pressure, and inflation on raw materials and wages.
The segment continues to focus on driving operational improvements through lean as well as
strategic sourcing initiatives. Comparing fiscal 2010 to 2009, segment profit as a percentage of
sales increased to 15.9% in 2010 from 13.9% in 2009. The increase in the segments profit was
primarily due to the commitment to lean manufacturing at all of the segments facilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents were $390.0 million at July 31, 2011, compared to $314.8 million at
July 31, 2010. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of $75.2 million was the result of cash
provided by operations of $167.4 million, and the $22.0 million positive effects of foreign
currency translation, offset by cash used for acquisitions, capital expenditures, dividends and
debt repayments during fiscal 2011.
The Companys working capital excluding cash as a percentage of sales remained flat at 5% in
fiscal 2011 and 2010. Accounts receivable balances increased $6.9 million from July 31, 2010 to
July 31, 2011. The increase in accounts receivable was due primarily to the impact of foreign
currency translation as well as the increase in sales volumes. Inventories increased $9.5 million
from July 31, 2010 to July 31, 2011 due to increased business activity and the impact of foreign
currency translation, partially offset by focused inventory reduction initiatives. Current
liabilities increased $8.1 million over the same period mainly due to the Companys forward foreign
exchange currency contracts designated as net investment hedges.
Cash flow from operating activities totaled $167.4 million and $165.2 million in fiscal 2011
and 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the $26.7 million increase in net income
partially offset by the change in working capital components outlined above. The increase was also
due to the payment of the Companys fiscal 2010 annual incentive compensation during fiscal 2011,
whereas no incentive compensation was paid in fiscal 2010 due to the elimination of the annual
incentive compensation in fiscal 2009.
Cash used for investing activities totaled $22.6 million and $48.7 million in fiscal 2011 and
2010, respectively. Cash used for acquisitions totaled $8.0 million during fiscal 2011 for the
acquisition of ID Warehouse. The Company used $30.4 million for acquisitions of Welco, Stickolor,
and Securimed during fiscal 2010; the net cash paid for Welco, Stickolor, and Securimed was $1.8
million, $18.5 million, and $10.1 million, respectively. The Company did not complete any
acquisitions in fiscal 2009. Cash received from the divestiture of the Teklynx business was $13.0
million during fiscal 2011.
The investing activities also include the settlement of net investment foreign exchange
contracts totaling a $5.5 million loss and a $6.2 million gain in fiscal 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The net settlement is accounted for as a component of other comprehensive income
(OCI) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Payments of $0.9 million and $0.6 million were made
during fiscal 2011 to satisfy the holdback and earnout liabilities of the Asterisco and Securimed
acquisitions, respectively. Payments of $0.7 million and $0.7 million were also made during fiscal
2009 to satisfy the earnout and holdback liabilities of the Transposafe and Asterisco acquisitions,
respectively.
24
Capital expenditures were $20.5 million in fiscal 2011, $26.3 million in fiscal 2010, and
$24.0 million in fiscal 2009. The decrease in the capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 was due to
the fiscal 2010 expenditures related to a new coater in the Americas segment and the increased
tooling required for new products in fiscal 2010 which did not repeat in fiscal 2011.
Cash used for financing activities totaled $91.6 million in fiscal 2011 and $160.3 million in
fiscal 2009. Financing activities provided a total of $15.3 million in fiscal 2010. Cash used for
dividends to shareholders was $38.0 million in fiscal 2011, $36.8 million in fiscal 2010, and $35.8
million in fiscal 2009. Cash received from the exercise of stock options was $8.2 million in fiscal
2011, $3.7 million in fiscal 2010, and $1.7 million in fiscal 2009. The Company made principal
payments on its long-term obligations of $61.3 million in fiscal 2011, $44.9 million in fiscal
2010, and $87.2 million in fiscal 2009. The Company purchased treasury stock of $2.5 million in
fiscal 2010, and $40.3 million in fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2010, the Company received proceeds of
$94.9 million from the May 2010 private placement as discussed below.
On November 24, 2008, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which will allow the Company to issue and sell, from
time to time in one or more offerings, an indeterminate amount of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock
and debt securities as it deems prudent or necessary to raise capital at a later date. The shelf
registration statement became effective upon filing with the SEC. The Company plans to use the
proceeds from any future offerings under the shelf registration for general corporate purposes,
including, but not limited to, acquisitions, capital expenditures, and refinancing of debt.
On May 13, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 75.0 million aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured notes to accredited institutional investors. The 75.0 million
of senior notes consists of 30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.71% Series 2010-A Senior
Notes, due May 13, 2017 and 45.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.24% Series 2010-A Senior
Notes, due May 13, 2020, with interest payable on the notes semiannually. This private placement
was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The notes were not
registered for resale and may not be resold absent such registration or an applicable exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities
laws. The notes have certain prepayment penalties for repaying them prior to maturity. The notes
have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by the Companys domestic
subsidiaries. These unsecured notes were issued pursuant to a note purchase agreement, dated May
13, 2010.
During fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2007, the Company completed three private placement note
issuances totaling $500 million in ten-year fixed rate notes with varying maturity dates to
institutional investors at interest rates varying from 5.14% to 5.33%. The notes must be repaid
equally over seven years, with initial payment due dates ranging from 2008 to 2011, with interest
payable on the notes due semiannually on various dates throughout the year, which began in December
2004. The private placements were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
of 1933. The notes were not registered for resale and may not be resold absent such registration or
an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
applicable state securities laws. The notes have certain prepayment penalties for repaying them
prior to the maturity date. Under the debt agreement, the Company made scheduled principal payments
of $21.4 million, $44.9 million, and $61.3 million during the years ended July 31, 2009, 2010, and
2011, respectively. In June 2009, the Company also completed a cash tender offer to purchase
approximately $65.8 million of its outstanding notes at par without penalty.
On October 5, 2006, the Company entered into a $200 million multi-currency revolving loan
agreement with a group of five banks that replaced the Companys previous credit agreement. At the
Companys option, and subject to certain standard conditions, the available amount under the credit
facility may be increased from $200 million up to $300 million. Under the credit agreement, the
Company has the option to select either a base interest rate (based upon the higher of the federal
funds rate plus one-half of 1% or the prime rate of Bank of America) or a Eurocurrency interest
rate (at the LIBOR rate plus a margin based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio). A
commitment fee is payable on the unused amount of the facility. The agreement restricts the amount
of certain types of payments, including dividends, which can be made annually to $50 million plus
an amount equal to 75% of consolidated net income for the prior fiscal year of the Company. The
Company believes that based on historic dividend practice, this restriction would not impede the
Company in following a similar dividend practice in the future. On March 18, 2008, the Company
entered into an amendment to the revolving loan agreement which extended the maturity date from
October 5, 2011 to March 18, 2013. All other terms of the revolving loan agreement remained the
same. As of July 31, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.
25
The Companys debt and revolving loan agreements require it to maintain certain financial
covenants. The Companys June 2004, February 2006, March 2007, and May 2010 private placement debt
agreements require the Company to maintain a ratio of debt to the trailing twelve months EBITDA, as
defined in the debt agreements, of not more than a 3.5 to 1.0 ratio (leverage ratio). As of July
31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant of the June 2004, February
2006, March 2007, and May 2010 private placement debt agreements, with the ratio of debt to EBITDA,
as defined by the agreements, equal to 1.7 to 1.0. Additionally, the Companys October 2006
revolving loan agreement, as amended and extended in May 2008, requires the Company to maintain a
ratio of debt to trailing twelve months EBITDA, as defined by the debt agreement, of not more than
a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio. The revolving loan agreement requires the Companys trailing twelve months
earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expense of not less than a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio
(interest expense coverage). As of July 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial
covenants of the revolving loan agreement, with the ratio of debt to EBITDA, as defined by the
agreement, equal to 1.8 to 1.0 and the interest expense coverage ratio equal to 7.8 to 1.0.
Long-term obligations as a percentage of long-term obligations plus stockholders investment
were 22.3% at July 31, 2011 and 27.6% at July 31, 2010. Long-term obligations decreased by $51.0
million from July 31, 2010 to July 31, 2011 due to debt repayments made during the year, offset by
the $10.3 million increase in the USD value of the Euro denominated debt due to foreign exchange
fluctuations. The fiscal 2011 debt repayments consisted of the scheduled installment of $26.1
million on the 2004 private placement, an installment of $18.8 million on the 2006 private
placement, and an installment of $16.4 million on the 2007 private placement.
Stockholders investment increased $151.2 million during fiscal 2011 primarily due to net
income of $108.7 million offset by the dividends paid on Class A and Class B Common Stock of $35.6
and $2.5 million, respectively. The increase in the accumulated other comprehensive income of $63.0
million was primarily due to positive effects of foreign currency translation.
The Companys cash balances are generated and held in numerous locations throughout the world.
At July 31, 2011, approximately 69% of the Companys cash and cash equivalents was held outside the
United States. The Companys growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided
by operating activities and debt financing. The Company believes that its cash from operations, in
addition to its borrowing capacity, are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working
capital, capital expenditures, restructuring activities, acquisitions, common stock repurchases,
scheduled debt repayments, and dividend payments. The Company believes that its current credit
arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet will allow financial flexibility
to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisition.
Subsequent Events Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources
On September 9, 2011, the Company announced an increase in the annual dividend to shareholders
of the Companys Class A Common Stock, from $0.72 to $0.74 per share. A quarterly dividend of
$0.185 will be paid on October 31, 2011, to shareholders of record at the close of business on
October 10, 2011. This dividend represents an increase of 2.8% and is the 26th consecutive annual
increase in dividends.
On September 9, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a share buyback program for
up to an additional 2 million shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The share repurchase
plan may be implemented from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, with repurchased shares available for use in connection with the Companys
stock-based compensation plans and for other corporate purposes.
26
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have material off-balance sheet arrangements or related party
transactions. The Company is not aware of factors that are reasonably likely to adversely affect
liquidity trends, other than the risks discussed in this filing and presented in other Company
filings. However, the following additional information is provided to assist financial statement
users.
Operating Leases These leases generally are entered into for investments in facilities such
as manufacturing facilities, warehouses and office space, computer equipment and Company vehicles.
Purchase Commitments The Company has purchase commitments for materials, supplies,
services, and property, plant and equipment as part of the ordinary conduct of its business. In the
aggregate, such commitments are not in excess of current market prices and are not material to the
financial position of the Company. Due to the proprietary nature of many of the Companys materials
and processes, certain supply contracts contain penalty provisions for early termination. The
Company does not believe a material amount of penalties will be incurred under these contracts
based upon historical experience and current expectations.
Other Contractual Obligations The Company does not have material financial guarantees or
other contractual commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect liquidity other than
those discussed below under Payments Due Under Contractual Obligations.
Related Party Transactions The Company evaluated its affiliated party transactions for the
period ended July 31, 2011. Based on the evaluation the Company does not have material related
party transactions that affect the results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
Payments Due Under Contractual Obligations
The Companys future commitments at July 31, 2011, for long-term debt, operating lease
obligations, purchase obligations, interest obligations and other obligations are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More than |
|
|
Uncertain |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
Timeframe |
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
393,178 |
|
|
$ |
61,264 |
|
|
$ |
122,528 |
|
|
$ |
85,028 |
|
|
$ |
124,358 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
57,026 |
|
|
|
18,350 |
|
|
|
23,303 |
|
|
|
12,816 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Obligations (1) |
|
|
76,558 |
|
|
|
61,771 |
|
|
|
8,072 |
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Obligations |
|
|
79,230 |
|
|
|
19,404 |
|
|
|
29,143 |
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Obligations |
|
|
22,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,343 |
|
Other Obligations (2) |
|
|
15,011 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
643,346 |
|
|
$ |
161,843 |
|
|
$ |
185,278 |
|
|
$ |
124,316 |
|
|
$ |
149,566 |
|
|
$ |
22,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase obligations include all open purchase orders as of July 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Other obligations represent expected payments under the Companys postretirement medical,
dental, and vision plans as disclosed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements,
under Item 8 of this report. |
Inflation and Changing Prices
Essentially all of the Companys revenue is derived from the sale of its products in
competitive markets. Because prices are influenced by market conditions, it is not always possible
to fully recover cost increases through pricing. Changes in product mix from year to year, timing
differences in instituting price changes, and the large amount of part numbers make it
impracticable to accurately define the impact of inflation on profit margins.
27
Critical Accounting Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation
of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. The Company bases these estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and judgments.
The Company believes the following accounting estimates are most critical to an understanding
of its financial statements. Estimates are considered to be critical if they meet both of the
following criteria: (1) the estimate requires assumptions about material matters that are uncertain
at the time the accounting estimates are made, and (2) material changes in the estimates are
reasonably likely from period to period. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and
other accounting estimates, refer to Note 1 to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate is based on pre-tax income and the tax rates applicable to that
income in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Significant judgment is required
in determining the Companys effective income tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions. The
Company establishes liabilities when it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize
the full tax benefit of the position. The Company adjusts these liabilities in light of changing
facts and circumstances.
Tax regulations may require items of income and expense to be included in a tax return in
different periods than the items are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. As a
result, the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated financial statements may be
different than the tax rate reported in the income tax return. Some of these differences are
permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible on the income tax return, and some are
temporary differences, such as depreciation expense. Temporary differences create deferred tax
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as tax
deductions or credits in the tax return in future years for which the Company has already recorded
the tax benefit in the consolidated financial statements. The Company establishes valuation
allowances against its deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the amount of
expected future taxable income will not support the use of the deduction or credit. The
determination of the amount of valuation allowance to be provided on recorded deferred tax assets
involves estimates regarding (1) the timing and amount of the reversal of taxable temporary
differences, (2) expected future taxable income, and (3) the impact of tax planning strategies, and
can also be impacted by changes to tax laws. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax
expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements for which payment has been deferred or
expense for which the Company has already taken a deduction on an income tax return, but has not
yet recognized as expense in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions by recognizing the financial statement
effects of a tax position only when, based upon the technical merits, it is more-likely-than-not
that the position will be sustained upon examination. Judgment is required in evaluating tax
positions and determining income tax provisions. The Company generally re-evaluates the technical
merits of its tax positions and recognizes an uncertain tax benefit when (i) there is completion of
a tax audit; (ii) there is a change in applicable tax law including a tax case ruling or
legislative guidance; or (iii) there is an expiration of the statute of limitations.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The allocation of purchase price for business combinations requires management estimates and
judgment as to expectations for future cash flows of the acquired business and the allocation of
those cash flows to identifiable intangible assets in determining the estimated fair value for
purchase price allocation purposes. If the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments
used in these estimates, the amounts recorded in the financial statements could result in a
possible impairment of the intangible assets and goodwill or require acceleration of the
amortization expense of finite-lived intangible assets. In addition, accounting guidance requires
that goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested at least annually for
impairment. If circumstances or events prior to the date of the required annual assessment indicate
that, in managements judgment, it is more likely than not that there has been diminution of fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying value, the Company performs an impairment analysis at
the time of such circumstance or event. Changes in managements estimates or judgments could result
in an impairment charge, and such a charge could have an adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations. To aid in establishing the value of goodwill and other
intangible assets at the time of acquisition, Company policy requires that all acquisitions with a
purchase price above $5 million require the use of external valuations.
28
The Company has identified seven reporting units within its three reportable segments. The
Companys methodologies for valuing goodwill are applied consistently on a year-over-year basis;
the assumptions used in performing the 2011 impairment calculations were evaluated in light of
market and business conditions. Brady continues to believe that the discounted cash flow model and
market
multiples model provide a reasonable and meaningful fair value estimate based upon the
reporting units projections of future operating results and cash flows and replicates how market
participants would value the Companys reporting units. The projections of future operating
results, which are based on both past performance and the projections and assumptions used in the
Companys current and long range operating plans, are subject to change as a result of changing
economic and competitive conditions. Significant estimates used by management in the discounted
cash flows methodology include estimates of future cash flows based on expected growth rates, price
increases, capital expenditures, working capital levels, income tax rates, the benefits of recent
acquisitions and expected synergies, and a weighted-average cost of capital that reflects the
specific risk profile of the reporting unit being tested. Significant negative industry or
economic trends, disruptions to the Companys business, loss of significant customers, inability to
effectively integrate acquired businesses, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use
of the assets or in entity structure, and divestitures may adversely impact the assumptions used in
the valuations.
In the event the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, including
goodwill, the Company would then perform an additional assessment that would compare the implied
fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. The determination of implied fair
value of goodwill would require management to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the
estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit; if necessary, the Company
may consult valuation specialists to assist with the assessment of the estimated fair value of
assets and liabilities for the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less
than the carrying value, an impairment would be recorded.
In performing the Companys annual goodwill impairment assessment the Company performed a
sensitivity analysis on the material assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation models
for each of its reporting units. Based on the Companys fiscal 2011 goodwill impairment testing and
assuming a hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair values of each of its reporting units,
the hypothetical fair value of each of the Companys reporting units would have been greater than
the carrying value. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item
8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further information about goodwill and
intangible assets.
The Company also evaluates the recoverability of its indefinite-lived intangible
assets by utilizing a relief from royalty valuation methodology that estimates the fair value of
the future discounted cash flows of each indefinite-lived intangible asset. The future
projections, which are based on both past performance and the projections and assumptions used in
the Companys current and long range operating plans, are subject to change as a result of changing
economic and competitive conditions. Significant estimates used by management in the relief from
royalty valuation methodology include estimates of future revenue streams based on expected growth
and royalty rates, income tax rates, expected synergies, and a weighted-average cost of equity that
reflects the specific risk profile of the indefinite-lived intangible asset tested. The Companys
methodologies for valuing indefinite-lived intangible assets are applied consistently on a
year-over-year basis. The Company continues to believe that the relief from royalty valuation
methodology provides the most reasonable and meaningful fair value estimate based upon the
indefinite-lived intangible assets projected future revenue streams and replicates how market
participants would value the Companys indefinite-lived intangible assets in an orderly
transaction.
The Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangibles assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Although the Company consistently uses
the same methods in developing the assumptions and estimates underlying the fair value
calculations, such estimates are uncertain in nature and can vary from actual results.
Reserves and Allowances
The Company has recorded reserves or allowances for inventory obsolescence, uncollectible
accounts receivable, and credit memos. These accounts require the use of estimates and judgment.
The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company believes that such estimates are
made with consistent and appropriate methods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
New Accounting Standards
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
29
Forward-Looking Statements
Brady believes that certain statements in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements related
to future, not past, events included in this Form 10-K, including, without limitation, statements
regarding Bradys future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs,
earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management
for future operations are forward-looking statements. When used in this Form 10-K, words such as
may, will, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, believe, should, project or
plan or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees,
uncertain and are subject to risks, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond Bradys
control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. For Brady, uncertainties arise from the length or severity of the
current worldwide economic downturn or timing or strength of a subsequent recovery; future
financial performance of major markets Brady serves, which include, without limitation,
telecommunications, manufacturing, electrical, construction, laboratory, education, governmental,
public utility, computer, transportation; difficulties in making and integrating acquisitions;
risks associated with newly acquired businesses; Bradys ability to develop and successfully market
new products; changes in the supply of, or price for, parts and components; increased price
pressure from suppliers and customers; fluctuations in currency rates versus the US dollar;
unforeseen tax consequences; potential write-offs of Bradys substantial intangible assets; Bradys
ability to retain significant contracts and customers; risks associated with international
operations; Bradys ability to maintain compliance with its debt covenants; technology changes;
business interruptions due to implementing business systems; environmental, health and safety
compliance costs and liabilities; future competition; interruptions to sources of supply; Bradys
ability to realize cost savings from operating initiatives; difficulties associated with exports;
risks associated with restructuring plans; risks associated with obtaining governmental approvals
and maintaining regulatory compliance; and numerous other matters of national, regional and global
scale, including those of a political, economic, business, competitive and regulatory nature
contained from time to time in Bradys U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including,
but not limited to, those factors listed in the Risk Factors section located in Item 1A of Part I
of this Form 10-K. These uncertainties may cause Bradys actual future results to be materially
different than those expressed in its forward-looking statements. Brady does not undertake to
update its forward-looking statements except as required by law.
30
Risk Factors
Please see the information contained in Item 1A Risk Factors.
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Companys business operations give rise to market risk exposure due to changes in foreign
exchange rates. To manage that risk effectively, the Company enters into hedging transactions,
according to established guidelines and policies that enable it to mitigate the adverse effects of
this financial market risk.
The global nature of the Companys business requires active participation in the foreign
exchange markets. As a result of investments, production facilities and other operations on a
global scale, the Company has assets, liabilities and cash flows in currencies other than the U.S.
Dollar. The objective of the Companys foreign currency exchange risk management is to minimize the
impact of currency movements on non-functional currency transactions and minimize the foreign
currency translation impact of the Companys foreign operations. To achieve this objective, the
Company hedges a portion of known exposures using forward contracts. Main exposures are related to
transactions denominated in the British Pound, the Euro, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar,
Japanese Yen and the Swiss Franc currency. As of July 31, 2011, the notional amount of outstanding
forward contacts designated as cash flow hedges was $80.8 million. The Company also uses forward
foreign exchange currency contracts of 38.7 million (approximately $50.0 million USD) and
euro-denominated debt of 75.0 million designated as a hedge instrument to hedge portions of the
Companys net investments in its European foreign operations.
The Company could be exposed to interest rate risk through its corporate borrowing activities.
The objective of the Companys interest rate risk management activities is to manage the levels of
the Companys fixed and floating interest rate exposure to be consistent with the Companys
preferred mix. The interest rate risk management program allows the Company to enter into approved
interest rate derivatives if there is a desire to modify the Companys exposure to interest rates.
Such activities require approval of the Board of Directors. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had no
interest rate derivatives.
The Company is subject to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates due to its
operations in foreign countries. The Company has manufacturing facilities and sells and distributes
its products throughout the world. As a result, the Companys financial results could be
significantly affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak
economic conditions in the foreign markets in which the Company manufactures, distributes and sells
its products. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates for the Companys foreign subsidiaries
reporting in local currencies are generally reported as a component of stockholders investment.
The Companys favorable and unfavorable currency translation adjustment recorded in fiscal 2011 and
2010 as a separate component of stockholders investment was $63.0 million and ($1.2) million,
respectively. As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, the Companys foreign subsidiaries had net current
assets (defined as current assets less current liabilities) subject to foreign currency translation
risk of $427.7 million and $240.4 million, respectively. The potential decrease in the net current
assets as of July 31, 2011 from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency
exchange rates would be approximately $42.8 million. This sensitivity analysis assumes a parallel
shift in all major foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. Exchange rates rarely
move in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar due to positive and negative correlations of
the various global currencies. This assumption may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates
on individual assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency.
31
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
BRADY CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Brady Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brady Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of July 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31,
2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15.
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Brady Corporation and subsidiaries at July 31, 2011 and 2010, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
July 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2011,
based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 27, 2011,
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, WI
September 27, 2011
33
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
July 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
389,971 |
|
|
$ |
314,840 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
228,483 |
|
|
|
221,621 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products |
|
|
62,152 |
|
|
|
52,906 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
14,550 |
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
27,484 |
|
|
|
28,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
104,186 |
|
|
|
94,672 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
35,647 |
|
|
|
37,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
758,287 |
|
|
|
668,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
800,343 |
|
|
|
768,600 |
|
Other intangibles assets |
|
|
89,961 |
|
|
|
103,546 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
53,755 |
|
|
|
39,103 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
19,244 |
|
|
|
20,808 |
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
6,406 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
104,644 |
|
|
|
101,138 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
305,557 |
|
|
|
289,727 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
11,226 |
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,833 |
|
|
|
407,003 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
287,918 |
|
|
|
261,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
139,915 |
|
|
|
145,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,861,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,746,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
98,847 |
|
|
$ |
96,702 |
|
Wages and amounts withheld from employees |
|
|
69,798 |
|
|
|
67,285 |
|
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
9,954 |
|
|
|
10,138 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
54,406 |
|
|
|
50,862 |
|
Current maturities on long-term obligations |
|
|
61,264 |
|
|
|
61,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
301,881 |
|
|
|
293,788 |
|
Long-term obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
331,914 |
|
|
|
382,940 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
71,518 |
|
|
|
64,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
705,313 |
|
|
|
741,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting Issued 51,261,487 and 51,261,487
shares, respectively; (aggregate liquidation preference
of $42,803 and $42,628 at July 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Class B Voting Issued and outstanding 3,538,628 shares |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
307,527 |
|
|
|
304,205 |
|
Earnings retained in the business |
|
|
789,100 |
|
|
|
718,512 |
|
Treasury stock 1,667,235 and 2,175,771 shares,
respectively of Class A nonvoting common stock, at cost |
|
|
(50,017 |
) |
|
|
(66,314 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
113,898 |
|
|
|
50,905 |
|
Other |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment |
|
|
1,156,192 |
|
|
|
1,005,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,861,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,746,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
34
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended July 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,208,702 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
683,401 |
|
|
|
635,799 |
|
|
|
631,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
656,196 |
|
|
|
623,297 |
|
|
|
577,583 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
43,001 |
|
|
|
42,621 |
|
|
|
34,181 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
441,815 |
|
|
|
435,906 |
|
|
|
397,180 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
15,314 |
|
|
|
25,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
494,004 |
|
|
|
493,841 |
|
|
|
457,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
162,192 |
|
|
|
129,456 |
|
|
|
120,373 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income net |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,124 |
) |
|
|
(21,222 |
) |
|
|
(24,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other expense |
|
|
(18,134 |
) |
|
|
(20,054 |
) |
|
|
(23,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
144,058 |
|
|
|
109,402 |
|
|
|
97,272 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
35,406 |
|
|
|
27,446 |
|
|
|
27,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Voting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Class A and Class B common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
52,639 |
|
|
|
52,402 |
|
|
|
52,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
53,133 |
|
|
|
52,946 |
|
|
|
52,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years Ended July 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
in the |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Balances at July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
292,769 |
|
|
$ |
639,059 |
|
|
$ |
(33,234 |
) |
|
$ |
128,161 |
|
|
$ |
(5,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
Net currency translation
adjustment and other (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 138,934 shares of
Class A Common Stock under
stock option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options and deferred
compensation distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 1,344,664 shares of
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $0.68 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $0.66 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
298,466 |
|
|
$ |
673,342 |
|
|
$ |
(69,823 |
) |
|
$ |
53,051 |
|
|
$ |
(4,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
Net currency translation
adjustment and other (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 215,447 shares of
Class A Common Stock under
stock option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options and deferred
compensation distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 102,067 shares of
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $0.70 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $0.68 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
304,205 |
|
|
$ |
718,512 |
|
|
$ |
(66,314 |
) |
|
$ |
50,905 |
|
|
$ |
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
Net currency translation
adjustment and other (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
171,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 524,144 shares of
Class A Common Stock under stock
option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options and deferred
compensation distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $0.72 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $0.70 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
307,527 |
|
|
$ |
789,100 |
|
|
$ |
(50,017 |
) |
|
$ |
113,898 |
|
|
$ |
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended July 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
|
|
54,851 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,161 |
) |
|
|
(6,834 |
) |
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
Gain on the sale of business (pre-tax) |
|
|
(4,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash portion of stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
Non-cash portion of restructuring |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effects of business acquisitions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
7,680 |
|
|
|
(29,479 |
) |
|
|
53,389 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
34,749 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
(3,502 |
) |
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(3,365 |
) |
|
|
52,410 |
|
|
|
(75,930 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
(9,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
167,350 |
|
|
|
165,238 |
|
|
|
126,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(7,970 |
) |
|
|
(30,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase price adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
Payments of contingent consideration |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,405 |
) |
Divestiture of business, net of cash retained in business |
|
|
12,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(20,532 |
) |
|
|
(26,296 |
) |
|
|
(24,027 |
) |
Settlements of net investment hedges |
|
|
(5,542 |
) |
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(22,631 |
) |
|
|
(48,681 |
) |
|
|
(19,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(38,064 |
) |
|
|
(36,786 |
) |
|
|
(35,839 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
Principal payments on debt |
|
|
(61,264 |
) |
|
|
(44,893 |
) |
|
|
(87,224 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
(40,267 |
) |
Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and deferred compensation
distributions, and other |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(91,574 |
) |
|
|
15,275 |
|
|
|
(160,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
21,986 |
|
|
|
(5,148 |
) |
|
|
(17,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
75,131 |
|
|
|
126,684 |
|
|
|
(70,199 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
314,840 |
|
|
|
188,156 |
|
|
|
258,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
389,971 |
|
|
$ |
314,840 |
|
|
$ |
188,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
21,298 |
|
|
$ |
21,626 |
|
|
$ |
26,047 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
|
35,851 |
|
|
|
30,870 |
|
|
|
48,766 |
|
Acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired, net of cash |
|
$ |
4,624 |
|
|
$ |
15,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(5,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions |
|
$ |
7,970 |
|
|
$ |
30,431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended July 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations Brady Corporation is an international manufacturer and marketer of
identification solutions and specialty products which identify and protect premises, products and
people. Bradys core capabilities in manufacturing, printing systems, precision engineering and
materials expertise make it a leading supplier to the Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO)
market and to the Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) market.
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Brady Corporation and its subsidiaries (Brady or the Company), all of which are
wholly-owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation The Company has reclassified certain prior year financial statement
amounts to conform to their current year presentation. The operating activities including Other
liabilities and Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which were previously disclosed as
single line items, have been combined and reported as Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on
the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ending July 2010 and 2009. The financing
activities including Other and Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and
deferred compensation distribution, which were previously disclosed as single line items, have
been combined and reported as Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and deferred
compensation distribution, and other on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years
ending July 2010 and 2009. This reclassification had no effect on cash provided by operating
activities, cash used in financing activities, total assets, net income, or earnings per share.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Subsequent Events On September 9, 2011, the Company announced an increase in the annual
dividend to shareholders of the Companys Class A Common Stock, from $0.72 to $0.74 per share. A
quarterly dividend of $0.185 will be paid on October 31, 2011, to shareholders of record at the
close of business on October 10, 2011. This dividend represents an increase of 2.8% and is the 26th
consecutive annual increase in dividends.
On September 9, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a share buyback program for
up to an additional 2 million shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The share repurchase
plan may be implemented from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, with repurchased shares available for use in connection with the Companys
stock-based compensation plans and for other corporate purposes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company believes the carrying amount of its
financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable) is a
reasonable estimate of the fair value of these instruments due to their short-term nature. The
Company adopted guidance related to fair value measurements on August 1, 2008 as it relates to
financial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the new accounting guidance on fair value
measurements for its nonfinancial assets and liabilities on August 1, 2009. See Note 5 for more
information regarding the fair value of long-term debt and Note 10 for fair value measurements.
Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents, which are recorded at
cost. The Companys cash equivalents as of July 31, 2010, included variable rate demand note
securities (VRDN) issued by various agencies that include a put feature to the original issuer or
the issuers agent. The Companys VRDN investments are generally federal tax-exempt instruments of
high credit quality, secured by direct-pay letters of credit from major financial institutions.
These investments have variable rates tied to short-term interest rates. Interest rates are reset
weekly and these VRDN investments can be tendered for sale upon notice (generally no longer than
seven days). Although the Companys VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities
(with maturities through 2029), they are priced and traded as short-term investments.
38
The Company classified the variable rate demand note securities with put features, where the
issuer holds the obligation, as cash equivalents. The investments are carried at cost or par value,
which approximates the fair value. As of July 31, 2010, the recorded values of the VRDNs held by
the Company were $66.1 million and there were no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to
the Companys securities. As of July 31, 2010, all VRDNs held by the Company were classified as
cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company did not hold any VRDNs
as of July 31, 2011.
Accounts Receivables Accounts receivables are stated net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $6,183 and $7,137 as of July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No single customer
comprises more than 10% of the Companys consolidated net sales in 2011, 2010, or 2009, or 10% of
the Companys consolidated accounts receivable as of July 31, 2011 or 2010. Specific customer
provisions are made when a review of significant outstanding amounts, utilizing information about
customer creditworthiness and current economic trends, indicates that collection is doubtful. In
addition, provisions are made for the remainder of accounts receivable at different rates, based
upon the age of the receivable and the Companys historical collection experience.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined
using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for certain domestic inventories (approximately 16% of
total inventories at July 31, 2011 and approximately 20% of total inventories at July 31, 2010) and
the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods for other inventories. Had all domestic
inventories been accounted for on a FIFO basis instead of on a LIFO basis, the carrying value would
have increased by $9,168 and $9,178 on July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Plant, Property, and Equipment Plant, property, and equipment are recorded at cost. The
cost of buildings and improvements and machinery and equipment is being depreciated over their
estimated useful lives using primarily the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes.
The estimated useful lives range from 3 to 33 years as shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category |
|
Range of Useful Lives |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
10 to 33 Years |
|
Computer systems |
|
5 Years |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3 to 10 Years |
|
Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until
disposal. Upon disposal, assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and the net amount, less proceeds from disposal, is charged or credited to operations. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the
respective asset. Depreciation expense was $28,997, $31,560, and $32,023 for the years ended July
31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The cost of intangible assets with determinable useful
lives is amortized to reflect the pattern of economic benefits consumed on a straight-line basis,
over the estimated periods benefited. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and goodwill
are not subjected to amortization. These assets are assessed for impairment annually or more
frequently as deemed necessary. Goodwill at July 31, 2011 and 2010 did not include any accumulated
impairment losses.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Pacific |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
410,135 |
|
|
$ |
166,251 |
|
|
$ |
174,787 |
|
|
$ |
751,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year acquisitions |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
(9,958 |
) |
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
(2,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
425,018 |
|
|
$ |
163,189 |
|
|
$ |
180,393 |
|
|
$ |
768,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
Current year divestitures |
|
|
(3,696 |
) |
|
|
(8,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,076 |
) |
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
16,429 |
|
|
|
18,342 |
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
425,578 |
|
|
$ |
171,238 |
|
|
$ |
203,527 |
|
|
$ |
800,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill increased $31,743 during fiscal 2011 due to the net effects of foreign currency
translation and recent acquisition activity, offset by recent divestitures. Of the $31,743
increase, $39,027 was due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation and $4,792
resulted from the acquisition of ID Warehouse during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The
increase was offset by a $12,076 decrease in goodwill as a result of the divestiture of the
Companys Teklynx business during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. See Note 2, Acquisitions and
Divestitures for further discussion.
39
Goodwill increased $17,427 during fiscal 2010 due to the acquisition activity in the period
offset by the net effects of foreign currency translation. Of the $17,427 increase in goodwill,
$778 resulted from the acquisition of certain assets of Welco, a division of Welconstruct Group
Limited (Welco) in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, $13,370 resulted from the acquisition of
Stickolor Industria e Comerciao de Auto Adesivos Ltda. (Stickolor) in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, and $6,118 resulted from the acquisition of Securimed SAS (Securimed) in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in goodwill was offset by the negative net effect of foreign
currency translation of $2,839 during fiscal 2010.
Other intangible assets include patents, trademarks, customer relationships, non-compete
agreements and other intangible assets with finite lives being amortized in accordance with
accounting guidance for other intangible assets. The net book value of these assets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Period (Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Period (Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortized other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
9,784 |
|
|
$ |
(8,556 |
) |
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
9,314 |
|
|
$ |
(7,855 |
) |
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
Trademarks and other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9,448 |
|
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8,823 |
|
|
|
(5,685 |
) |
|
|
3,138 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
165,566 |
|
|
|
(119,977 |
) |
|
|
45,589 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
152,720 |
|
|
|
(95,996 |
) |
|
|
56,724 |
|
Non-compete agreements and other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16,432 |
|
|
|
(15,760 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15,239 |
|
|
|
(14,356 |
) |
|
|
883 |
|
Unamortized other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
41,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
240,853 |
|
|
$ |
(150,892 |
) |
|
$ |
89,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
227,438 |
|
|
$ |
(123,892 |
) |
|
$ |
103,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value of other intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2011,
differs from the value assigned to them in the allocation of purchase price due to the effect of
fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate financial statements into the United States
dollar between the date of acquisition and July 31, 2011.
Amortization expense of intangible assets during fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $19,830,
$21,462, and $22,828, respectively. The amortization over each of the next five fiscal years is
projected to be $16,883, $11,029, $5,946, $5,540, and $4,353 for the years ending July 31, 2012,
2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Other Intangible Assets The Company evaluates whether events
and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of long-lived and
other finite-lived intangible assets may warrant revision or that the remaining balance of an asset
may not be recoverable. The measurement of possible impairment is based on fair value of the assets
generally estimated by the ability to recover the balance of assets from expected future operating
cash flows on an undiscounted basis. If impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment
loss is calculated based on the fair value of the asset.
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets Goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Annual impairment tests are
performed by the Company in the fourth quarter of each year.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company conducted a goodwill impairment
assessment. The assessment included comparing the carrying amount of net assets, including
goodwill, of each reporting unit to its respective fair value as of May 1, 2011, the Companys
assessment date. Fair value was determined using the weighted average of a discounted cash flow and
market participant analysis for each reporting unit. The Companys methodologies for valuing
goodwill are applied consistently on a year-over-year basis. No indications of impairment have been
identified between the date of the interim assessments and July 31, 2011.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company conducted an indefinite-lived intangible
asset impairment assessment. The assessment included comparing the carrying amount of the
indefinite-lived intangible asset to the fair value of those assets as of May 1, 2011, the
Companys assessment date. Fair value was determined using a discounted revenue stream analysis for
each indefinite-lived intangible based on a relief from royalty valuation methodology. The
Companys methodologies for valuing indefinite-lived intangible assets are applied consistently on
a year-over-year basis. No indications of impairment have been identified between the date of the
interim assessments and July 31, 2011.
40
Catalog Costs and Related Amortization The Company accumulates all direct costs incurred,
net of vendor cooperative advertising payments, in the development, production, and circulation of
its catalogs on its balance sheet until such time as the related catalog is mailed. The catalog
costs are subsequently amortized into selling, general, and administrative expense over the
expected sales realization cycle, which is one year or less. Consequently, any difference between
the estimated and actual revenue stream for a particular catalog and the related impact on
amortization expense is neutralized within a period of one year or less. The estimate of the
expected sales realization cycle for a particular catalog is based on the Companys historical
sales experience with identical or similar catalogs, and an assessment of prevailing economic
conditions and various competitive factors. The Company tracks subsequent sales realization,
reassesses the marketplace, and compares its findings to the previous estimate, and adjusts the
amortization of future catalogs, if necessary. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, $11,892 and $11,496,
respectively, of prepaid catalog costs were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when it is both earned and realized or
realizable. The Companys policy is to recognize revenue when title to the product, ownership, and
risk of loss have transferred to the customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, and
collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured, all of which generally occur upon shipment
of goods to customers. The majority of the Companys revenue relates to the sale of inventory to
customers, and revenue is recognized when title and the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the
customer. Given the nature of the Companys business and the applicable rules guiding revenue
recognition, the Companys revenue recognition practices do not contain estimates that materially
affect the results of operations, with the exception of estimated returns and credit memos. The
Company provides for an allowance for estimated product returns and credit memos which is
recognized as a deduction from sales at the time of the sale. As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, the
Company had a reserve of $4,491 and $3,963, respectively.
Sales Incentives The Company accounts for cash consideration (such as sales incentives and
cash discounts) given to its customers or resellers as a reduction of revenue rather than an
operating expense.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs Amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction
related to shipping and handling fees are reported as net sales and the related costs incurred for
shipping and handling are reported as cost of goods sold.
Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred, except catalog and mailer
costs as outlined above. Advertising expense for the years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were
$79,326, $72,000, and $77,395, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation The Company has an incentive stock plan under which the Board of
Directors may grant nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock
or restricted shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to employees. Additionally, the Company has
a nonqualified stock option plan for non-employee directors under which stock options to purchase
shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock are available for grant. The stock options have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant and
generally vest ratably over a three-year period, with one-third becoming exercisable one year after
the grant date and one-third additional in each of the succeeding two years. Stock options issued
under these plans, referred to herein as service-based stock options, generally expire 10 years
from the date of grant. The Company also grants stock options to certain executives and key
management employees that vest upon meeting certain financial performance conditions over the
vesting schedule described above; these options are referred to herein as performance-based stock
options. Performance-based stock options expire 10 years from the date of grant. Restricted shares
have an issuance price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
The Company granted restricted shares in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011 that have an issuance price
equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The restricted shares
granted in fiscal 2008 were amended in fiscal 2011 to allow for vesting after either a five-year
period or a seven-year period based upon both performance and service conditions. The restricted
shares granted in fiscal 2011 vest ratably at the end of years 3, 4 and 5 upon meeting certain
performance and service conditions. The restricted shares granted in fiscal 2008 and 2011 are
referred to herein as performance-based restricted shares.
As of July 31, 2011, the Company has reserved 5,799,017 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock for outstanding stock options and restricted shares and 737,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting
Common Stock for future issuance of stock options and restricted shares under the various plans.
The Company uses treasury stock or will issue new Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to deliver shares
under these plans.
41
The Company recognizes the compensation cost of all share-based awards on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period of the award. Total stock compensation expense recognized by the
Company during the years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $9,830 ($5,996 net of taxes),
$9,721 ($5,930 net of taxes), and $7,731 ($4,716 net of taxes), respectively. As of July 31, 2011,
total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation awards was $18,551
pre-tax, net of estimated forfeitures, which the Company expects to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
The Company has estimated the fair value of its performance-based and service-based option
awards granted after August 1, 2005 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model are reflected in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
|
Service-Based |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Service-Based |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Service-Based |
|
Black-Scholes Option Valuation Assumptions |
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
39.39 |
% |
|
|
40.22 |
% |
|
|
38.72 |
% |
|
|
39.88 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
36.07 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2.03 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
Weighted-average market value of
underlying stock at grant date |
|
$ |
28.43 |
|
|
$ |
29.13 |
|
|
$ |
28.73 |
|
|
$ |
28.68 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
21.26 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
28.35 |
|
|
$ |
29.13 |
|
|
$ |
29.78 |
|
|
$ |
28.68 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
21.26 |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted |
|
$ |
9.87 |
|
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
|
$ |
8.70 |
|
|
$ |
8.77 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
The Company uses historical data regarding stock option exercise behaviors to estimate the
expected term of options granted based on the period of time that options granted are expected to
be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys
stock. The expected dividend yield is based on the Companys historical dividend payments and
historical yield. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
on the grant date for the length of time corresponding to the expected term of the option. The
market value is calculated as the average of the high and the low stock price on the date of grant.
Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved an amendment to the fiscal 2008 performance-based restricted shares to provide for an
additional two-year vesting period. These awards originally vested five years from the grant date
upon meeting certain financial performance and service conditions. This modification resulted in a
one-time cumulative reduction of $1.2 million to share-based compensation expense in order to align
the expense recognition with the amended vesting terms. The Companys Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, and the other three named executive officers currently have the following
performance-based restricted shares affected by this amendment: Frank M. Jaehnert, 50,000 shares;
Thomas J. Felmer, 35,000 shares; Peter C. Sephton, 35,000 shares; Matthew O. Williamson, 35,000
shares; and Robert L. Tatterson, 20,000 shares.
The Company granted 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock to Frank M. Jaehnert,
the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer in August of 2010, with a grant price and fair
value of $28.35 per share. The Company also granted 210,000 shares of performance-based restricted
stock during fiscal 2008, with a grant price and fair value of $32.83. As of July 31, 2011,
310,000 performance-based restricted shares were outstanding.
The Company granted 465,000 performance-based stock options during fiscal 2011, with a
weighted average exercise price of $28.35 and a weighted average fair value of $9.87. The Company
also granted 900,500 service-based stock options during fiscal 2011, with a weighted average
exercise price of $29.13 and a weighted average fair value of $9.59.
Research and Development Amounts expended for research and development are expensed as
incurred.
42
Other comprehensive income Other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency
translation adjustments, net unrealized gains and losses from cash flow hedges and net investment
hedges, and the unamortized gain on the post-retirement medical, dental and vision plans net of
their related tax effects.
The following table illustrates the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated
other comprehensive income for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of gain on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
post- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
retirement |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
(loss) gain on |
|
|
medical, |
|
|
currency |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
cash flow |
|
|
dental and |
|
|
translation |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
hedges |
|
|
vision plan |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
income |
|
Beginning balance, July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
$ |
2,493 |
|
|
$ |
126,639 |
|
|
$ |
128,161 |
|
Current-period change |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(75,477 |
) |
|
|
(75,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
$ |
51,162 |
|
|
$ |
53,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current-period change |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
(2,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(321 |
) |
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
$ |
49,869 |
|
|
$ |
50.905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current-period change |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
62,995 |
|
|
|
62,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(1,154 |
) |
|
$ |
2,188 |
|
|
$ |
112,864 |
|
|
$ |
113,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in accumulated other comprehensive income for the year ended July
31, 2011 as compared to the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 was primarily due to the
depreciation of the U.S. dollar against other currencies. The foreign currency translation
adjustments line in the table above includes the impact of foreign currency translation in addition
to the settlements of the net investment hedges, net of tax.
Foreign Currency Translation Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into
United States dollars at end of period rates of exchange, and income and expense accounts are
translated at the weighted average rates of exchange for the period. Resulting translation
adjustments are included in other comprehensive income.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the applicable
accounting guidance, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and
reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable
or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods
in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during
the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax
positions only if sustaining those positions is more likely than not. Changes in recognition or
measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs.
Risk Management Activities The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in
interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign Currency Hedging The objective of the Companys foreign currency exchange risk
management is to minimize the impact of currency movements on non-functional currency transactions
and minimize the foreign currency translation impact on the Companys foreign operations. While the
Companys risk management objectives and strategies are driven from an economic perspective, the
Company attempts, where possible and practical, to ensure that the hedging strategies it engages in
qualify for hedge accounting and result in accounting treatment where the earnings effect of the
hedging instrument provides substantial offset (in the same period) to the earnings effect of the
hedged item. Generally, these risk management transactions will involve the use of foreign currency
derivatives to protect against exposure resulting from transactions in a currency differing from
the respective functional currency.
The Company utilizes forward foreign exchange currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate
risk of specific foreign currency denominated transactions. These contracts typically require the
exchange of a foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed rate at a future date, with maturities
of less than 18 months. These instruments may or may not qualify as hedges under the accounting
guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities based upon the intended objective of the
contract. The fair value of these
instruments at July 31, 2011 and 2010 was a liability of $6,109 and $673, respectively. As of
July 31, 2011, the notional amount of these outstanding forward exchange contracts was $80.8
million. See Note 12 for more information regarding the Companys derivative instruments and
hedging activities.
43
The Company has designated a portion of its foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges and
recorded these contracts at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these instruments,
the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. At July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, unrealized
losses of $1,535 and $493 have been included in OCI, respectively. All balances are expected to be
reclassified from OCI to earnings during the next fifteen months when the hedged transactions
impact earnings.
The Company has designated a portion of its foreign exchange contracts as net investment
hedges of the Companys net investments in European foreign operations and recorded these contracts
at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For net investment hedges that meet the
effectiveness requirements, the net gains or losses attributable to changes in spot exchange rates
are recorded in cumulative translation within other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portions
are to be recognized in earnings. Recognition in earnings of amounts previously recorded in
cumulative translation is limited to circumstances such as complete or substantially complete
liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. At July 31, 2011 and July 31,
2010, unrealized losses of $4,589 and unrealized gains of $6,248 have been included in OCI,
respectively.
The Company also utilizes Euro-denominated debt designated as hedge instruments to hedge
portions of the Companys net investments in European foreign operations. As of July 31, 2011, the
Company had 75.0 million foreign denominated debt outstanding designated as a net investment hedge
of the Companys net investment in its European foreign operations. See Note 12 for more
information regarding the Companys derivative instruments and hedging activities. For net
investment hedges that meet the effectiveness requirements, the net gains or losses attributable to
changes in spot exchange rates are recorded in cumulative translation within other comprehensive
income. Any ineffective portions are to be recognized in earnings. Recognition in earnings of
amounts previously recorded in cumulative translation is limited to circumstances such as complete
or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. At
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, unrealized losses of $13,070 and $2,833 have been included in OCI,
respectively.
The Company also enters into forward exchange contracts to create economic hedges to manage
foreign exchange risk exposure. The fair value of these instruments at July 31, 2011 and 2010 was
$1 and $40, respectively. The Company has not designated these derivative contracts as hedge
transactions, and accordingly, the mark-to-market impact of these derivatives is recorded each
period in current earnings.
Hedge effectiveness is determined by how closely the changes in the fair value of the hedging
instrument offset the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting
is permitted only if the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective at the inception
of the hedge and on an on-going basis. Gains or losses on the derivative related to hedge
ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not
significant for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.
New Accounting Standards In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
amended its authoritative guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income, requiring
entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous
statement or in two separate consecutive statements. This guidance becomes effective for the
Companys fiscal 2013 first quarter. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting this
guidance but believes that it will result only in changes in the presentation of its financial
statements and will not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to fair value measurements to
provide a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure
requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance
clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the existing disclosure
requirements. This guidance becomes effective for the Companys fiscal 2012 third quarter. This
guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations,
financial position or cash flows, but may require certain additional disclosures.
In December 2010, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to Step 1 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those
reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill
impairment test if it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. In determining
whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, consideration should be made
as to whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist.
This guidance becomes effective for the Company in fiscal 2012. The adoption of this standard is
not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
44
2. Acquisitions and Divestitures
The Company completed one business acquisition during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 and
three business acquisitions during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010. The Company did not
complete any business acquisitions during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. All of these
transactions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting; therefore, the results of
the acquired operations are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements only
since their acquisition dates.
The Company also divested of one business during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011. The
Company did not complete any divestitures during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2010 or 2009.
Fiscal 2011
In November 2010, the Company acquired ID Warehouse, based in New South Wales, Australia for
$7,970. ID Warehouse offers security identification and visitor management products including
identification card printers, access control cards, wristbands, tamper-evident security seals and
identification accessories. The business is included in the Companys Asia-Pacific segment. The
purchase price allocation resulted in $4,792 assigned to goodwill, $1,846 assigned to customer
relationships, and $487 assigned to non-compete agreements. The amounts assigned to the customer
relationships and non-compete agreements are being amortized over 10 and 5 years, respectively.
The Company expects the acquisition to further strengthen its position in the people identification
business in Australia and the segment.
The following table summarizes the combined estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets net of cash |
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
415 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,792 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,846 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired net of cash |
|
|
9,416 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
7,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the operations of the acquired business have been included since the date of
acquisition in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Pro forma information related to
the acquisition of ID Warehouse was not included because the impact on the Companys consolidated
results of operations is considered to be immaterial.
In December 2010, the Company sold its Teklynx business, a barcode software company. The
Teklynx business had operations primarily in the Companys Americas and Europe segments. The
Company received proceeds of $12,980, net of cash retained in the business. The transaction
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4,394, which was accounted for in Selling, general, and
administrative expenses (SG&A) on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended July
31, 2011. The divestiture of the Teklynx business was part of the Companys continued long-term
growth strategy to focus the Companys energies and resources on growth of the Companys core
business.
Fiscal 2010
In March 2010, the Company acquired Securimed SAS (Securimed), based in Coudekerque, France
for $10,132. Securimed is a leading French supplier and distributor of customized first-aid kits
and supplies, and related healthcare products including personal protection, disinfection and
hygiene products, diagnosis materials, and products for emergency response. The Securimed business
is included in the Companys Europe segment.
In December 2009, the Company acquired Stickolor Industria e Comercio de Auto Adesivos Ltda.
(Stickolor), based in Saõ Paulo, Brazil for $18,459. Stickolor manufactures screen-printed custom
labels, overlays and nameplates for automobiles, tractors,
motorcycles, electronics, white goods and general industrial markets. The Stickolor business
is included in the Companys Americas segment.
45
In October 2009, the Company acquired certain assets of the Welco division of Welconstruct
Group Limited, based in the United Kingdom for $1,840. The Welco division conducts a direct
marketing business consisting of sales of storage, handling, office and workplace products, and
equipment via catalog and the internet to industrial and commercial markets under the name and
title Welco. The Welco business is included in the Companys Europe segment.
The following table summarizes the combined estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets net of cash |
|
$ |
5,313 |
|
Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
743 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
20,266 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
7,970 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired net of cash |
|
|
35,632 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
5,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
30,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased identifiable intangible assets for the three business acquisitions closed during the
twelve months ended July 31, 2010 totaled $9,310 and will be amortized on a straight-line basis
over lives ranging from three to ten years.
The results of the operations of the acquired businesses have been included since the
respective dates of acquisition in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Pro forma
information related to the acquisitions during the twelve months ended July 31, 2010 is not
included because the impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations is considered to be
immaterial.
3. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides postretirement medical, dental and vision benefits (the Plan) for
eligible regular full and part-time domestic employees (including spouses) outlined by the plan.
Postretirement benefits are provided only if the employee was hired prior to April 1, 2008, and
retires on or after attainment of age 55 with 15 years of credited service. Credited service begins
accruing at the later of age 40 or date of hire. All active employees first eligible to retire
after July 31, 1992, are covered by an unfunded, contributory postretirement healthcare plan where
employer contributions will not exceed a defined dollar benefit amount, regardless of the cost of
the program. Employer contributions to the plan are based on the employees age and service at
retirement.
The accounting guidance on defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans requires
full recognition of the funded status of defined benefit and other postretirement plans on the
balance sheet as an asset or a liability. The guidance also continues to require that unrecognized
prior service costs/credits, gains/losses, and transition obligations/assets be recorded in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, thus not changing the income statement recognition rules
for such plans.
The Plan is unfunded and recorded as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets as of July 31, 2011 and 2010. The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes
in the Plans accumulated benefit obligations during the years ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15,277 |
|
|
$ |
14,311 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
967 |
|
Benefit payments |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
Plan amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation at end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
15,011 |
|
|
$ |
15,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The voluntary retiree medical savings account plan was terminated effective December 31, 2009.
Employer match account balances were prorated and paid to participants through a settlement of
$455, and the remaining reduction in the liability resulted in a plan amendment of $169 as of July
31, 2010.
46
As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, amounts recognized as liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current liability |
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
Noncurrent liability |
|
|
13,957 |
|
|
|
14,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,011 |
|
|
$ |
15,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, pre-tax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net actuarial gain |
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
2,252 |
|
Prior service credit |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,634 |
|
|
$ |
2,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost for the Plan for fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009 includes the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost included the following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits attributed to service during the period |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
Prior service credit |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized gain |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
Curtailment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated actuarial gain and prior service credit that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic postretirement benefit cost over the next fiscal year
are $178 and $82, respectively. The termination of the voluntary retiree medical savings account
plan resulted in a reduction in the liability for the one-time settlement of $455 and the one-time
plan amendment of $169 as of July 31, 2010. The reduction in workforce resulted in a one-time
curtailment gain of $679 and the accelerated recognition of the previously unrecognized prior
service cost of $106, offset by a one-time separation benefit charge of $1,178, resulting in a net
curtailment loss of $393 as of July 31, 2009.
The following assumptions were used in accounting for the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average discount rate used in determining accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation liability |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Weighted average discount rate used in determining net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Assumed health care trend rate used to measure APBO at July 31 |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Rate to which cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Fiscal year the ultimate trend rate is reached |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported for
the Plan. A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the
following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Percentage |
|
|
One-Percentage |
|
|
|
Point Increase |
|
|
Point Decrease |
|
Effect on future service and interest cost |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are
expected to be paid during the years ending July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,084 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,148 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,234 |
|
2016 |
|
|
1,304 |
|
2017 through 2021 |
|
|
7,791 |
|
47
The Company has retirement and profit-sharing plans covering substantially all full-time
domestic employees and certain of its foreign subsidiaries. Contributions to the plans are
determined annually or quarterly, according to the respective plans, based on earnings of the
respective companies and employee contributions. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, $7,293 and $7,540,
respectively, of accrued retirement and profit-sharing contributions were included in other current
liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company also has deferred compensation plans for directors, officers and key executives
which are discussed below. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, $12,299 and $10,398, respectively, of
deferred compensation was included in current and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
During fiscal 1998, the Company adopted a new deferred compensation plan that invests solely
in shares of the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. Participants in a predecessor phantom
stock plan were allowed to convert their balances in the old plan to this new plan. The new plan
was funded initially by the issuance of shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to a Rabbi Trust.
All deferrals into the new plan result in purchases of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock by the Rabbi
Trust. No deferrals are allowed into a predecessor plan. Shares held by the Rabbi Trust are
distributed to participants upon separation from the Company as defined in the plan agreement.
During fiscal 2002, the Company adopted a new deferred compensation plan that allows future
contributions to be invested in shares of the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock or in
certain other investment vehicles. Prior deferred compensation deferrals must remain in the
Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. All participant deferrals into the new plan result in
purchases of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock or certain other investment vehicles by the Rabbi
Trust. Balances held by the Rabbi Trust are distributed to participants upon separation from the
Company as defined in the plan agreement. On May 1, 2006, the plan was amended to require that
deferrals into the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock must remain in the Companys Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock and be distributed in shares of the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock.
The amounts charged to expense for the retirement and profit sharing described above were
$14,911, $12,547, and $11,765 during the years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.
4. Income Taxes
Income (loss) before income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
29,913 |
|
|
$ |
4,423 |
|
|
$ |
(383 |
) |
Other Nations |
|
|
114,145 |
|
|
|
104,979 |
|
|
|
97,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
144,058 |
|
|
$ |
109,402 |
|
|
$ |
97,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current income tax expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
Other Nations |
|
|
37,384 |
|
|
|
32,800 |
|
|
|
31,223 |
|
States (U.S.) |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,567 |
|
|
|
34,280 |
|
|
|
35,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
(5,161 |
) |
|
|
(4,604 |
) |
|
|
(7,633 |
) |
Other Nations |
|
|
(3,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
States (U.S.) |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,161 |
) |
|
|
(6,834 |
) |
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,406 |
|
|
$ |
27,446 |
|
|
$ |
27,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of revenues and
expenses for financial statement and income tax purposes.
The approximate tax effects of temporary differences are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
5,328 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
5,291 |
|
Prepaid catalog costs |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(3,038 |
) |
|
|
(3,020 |
) |
Employee benefits |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
1,904 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
8,429 |
|
|
|
(2,363 |
) |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
16,646 |
|
|
|
(5,513 |
) |
|
|
11,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets |
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
|
(7,672 |
) |
|
|
(5,483 |
) |
Intangible Assets |
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
(33,798 |
) |
|
|
(31,834 |
) |
Capitalized R&D expenditures |
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
23,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,654 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,764 |
|
Tax credit carry-forwards and net operating losses |
|
|
62,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,638 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
|
(27,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,476 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
74,993 |
|
|
|
(41,470 |
) |
|
|
33,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
91,639 |
|
|
$ |
(46,983 |
) |
|
$ |
44,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
6,666 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,666 |
|
Prepaid catalog costs |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
Employee benefits |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
17,137 |
|
|
|
(3,811 |
) |
|
|
13,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets |
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
(9,270 |
) |
|
|
(7,536 |
) |
Intangible Assets |
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
(26,969 |
) |
|
|
(24,999 |
) |
Capitalized R&D expenditures |
|
|
7,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,953 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
22,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,100 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
|
7,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
Tax credit carry-forwards and net operating losses |
|
|
48,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,140 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
|
(27,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,510 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(6,429 |
) |
|
|
(6,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
62,159 |
|
|
|
(42,668 |
) |
|
|
19,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
79,296 |
|
|
$ |
(46,479 |
) |
|
$ |
32,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carry-forwards at July 31, 2011 are comprised of:
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carry-forwards of $84,182, of which $73,388 have no expiration
date and the remainder of which expire within the next 5 years. |
|
|
|
State net operating loss carry-forwards of $71,880, which expire from 2014 to 2030. |
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit carry-forwards of $28,304, which expire from 2018 to 2021. |
|
|
|
State research and development credit carry-forwards of $346, which expire from 2017 to
2029. |
The valuation allowance decreased by $34 during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 and
increased by $1,840 during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010. If realized or reversed in future
periods, substantially all of the valuation allowance would impact the income tax rate.
49
Rate Reconciliation
A reconciliation of the tax computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to
income before income taxes to the total income tax expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Tax at statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
International rate differential |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
|
(9.8 |
)% |
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
Non-creditable withholding taxes |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Rate variances arising from foreign subsidiary distributions |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
Adjustments to tax accruals and reserves |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Research and development tax credits |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
Other, net |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is eligible for tax holidays on the earnings of certain subsidiaries in Asia,
including China, India, Thailand, and the Philippines. The benefits realized as a result of these
tax holidays reduced the consolidated effective tax rate by approximately 1.5%, 2.3%, and 3.3%
during the years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. These tax holidays are in the
process of expiring and are anticipated to be fully exhausted by March 31, 2014.
Uncertain Tax Positions
On August 1, 2007, the Company adopted guidance regarding uncertain tax positions. The
guidance requires application of a more likely than not threshold to the recognition and
derecognition of tax positions.
A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
2,526 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years(1) |
|
|
4,056 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(934 |
) |
Lapse of
statute of limitations |
|
|
(944 |
) |
Settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
60 |
|
Cumulative Translation Adjustments and
other |
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
19,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
1,989 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
3,934 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(6,672 |
) |
Lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(194 |
) |
Settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
Cumulative Translation Adjustments and other |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
17,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
5,147 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
2,387 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(291 |
) |
Lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(2,803 |
) |
Settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(728 |
) |
Cumulative Translation Adjustments and other |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
22,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes acquisitions. |
With the exception of Cumulative Translation Adjustments, the entire amount of unrecognized
tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the Companys effective income tax rate.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the
provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of income.
50
Interest expense is recognized on the amount of potentially underpaid taxes associated with
the Companys tax positions, beginning in the first period in which interest starts accruing under
the respective tax law and continuing until the tax positions are settled. During the years ended
July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company recognized a $990 reduction in interest expense, and a
$33 and $427 increase in interest expense, respectively, and $500, $780 and $414 of penalties,
respectively, related to the reserve for uncertain tax positions, net of amounts reversing due to
reductions for tax positions of prior years, statute of limitations, and settlements. At July 31,
2011 and 2010, the Company had $1,507 and $2,473, respectively, accrued for interest on
unrecognized tax benefits. Penalties are accrued if the tax position does not meet the minimum
statutory threshold to avoid the payment of a penalty. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had
$2,229 and $1,592, respectively, accrued for penalties on unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefits may be
reduced by $2,351 within twelve months as a result of the resolution of worldwide tax matters, tax
audit settlements, and/or statute expirations.
During the year ended July 31, 2011, the Company recognized tax benefits associated with
certain international and domestic tax positions being resolved and the lapse of statutes of
limitations.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S., various state, and
foreign jurisdictions. The following table summarizes the open tax years for the Companys major
jurisdictions:
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Open Tax Years |
United States Federal
|
|
F09 F11 |
France
|
|
F08 F11 |
Germany
|
|
F03 F11 |
United Kingdom
|
|
F09 F11 |
Unremitted Earnings
The Company does not provide for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative earnings of non-U.S.
affiliates and associated companies that have been reinvested indefinitely. These earnings relate
to ongoing operations and at July 31, 2011, were approximately $455,812. These earnings have been
reinvested in non-U.S. business operations and the Company does not intend to repatriate these
earnings to fund U.S. operations. It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that
would be payable if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested.
51
5. Long-Term Obligations
On May 13, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 75.0 million aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured notes to accredited institutional investors. The 75.0 million
of senior notes consists of 30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.71% Series 2010-A Senior
Notes, due May 13, 2017 and 45.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.24% Series 2010-A Senior
Notes, due May 13, 2020, with interest payable on the notes semiannually. This private placement
was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The notes were not
registered for resale and may not be resold absent such registration or an applicable exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities
laws. The notes have certain prepayment penalties for repaying them prior to maturity. The notes
have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by the Companys domestic
subsidiaries. These unsecured notes were issued pursuant to a note purchase agreement, dated May
13, 2010.
During fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2007, the Company completed three private placement note
issuances totaling $500 million in ten-year fixed rate notes with varying maturity dates to
institutional investors at interest rates varying from 5.14% to 5.33%. The notes must be repaid
equally over seven years, with initial payment due dates ranging from 2008 to 2011, with interest
payable on the notes due semiannually on various dates throughout the year, which began in December
2004. The private placements were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
of 1933. The notes were not registered for resale and may not be resold absent such registration or
an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
applicable state securities laws. The notes have certain prepayment penalties for repaying them
prior to the maturity date. Under the debt agreement, the Company made scheduled principal payments
of $21.4 million, $44.9 million, and $61.3 million during the years ended July 31, 2009, 2010, and
2011, respectively. In June 2009, the Company also completed a cash tender offer to purchase
approximately $65.8 million of its outstanding notes at par without penalty.
On October 5, 2006, the Company entered into a $200 million multi-currency revolving loan
agreement with a group of five banks that replaced the Companys previous credit agreement. At the
Companys option, and subject to certain standard conditions, the available amount under the credit
facility may be increased from $200 million up to $300 million. Under the credit agreement, the
Company has the option to select either a base interest rate (based upon the higher of the federal
funds rate plus one-half of 1% or the prime rate of Bank of America) or a Eurocurrency interest
rate (at the LIBOR rate plus a margin based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio). A
commitment fee is payable on the unused amount of the facility. The agreement restricts the amount
of certain types of payments, including dividends, which can be made annually up to $50 million
plus an amount equal to 75% of consolidated net income for the prior fiscal year of the Company.
The Company believes that based on historic dividend practice, this restriction would not impede
the Company in following a similar dividend practice in the future. On March 18, 2008, the Company
entered into an amendment to the revolving loan agreement which extended the maturity date from
October 5, 2011 to March 18, 2013. All other terms of the revolving loan agreement remained the
same. As of July 31, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.
The Companys debt and revolving loan agreements require it to maintain certain financial
covenants. The Companys June 2004, February 2006, March 2007, and May 2010 private placement debt
agreements require the Company to maintain a ratio of debt to the trailing twelve months EBITDA, as
defined in the debt agreements, of not more than a 3.5 to 1.0 ratio (leverage ratio). As of July
31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant of the June 2004, February
2006, March 2007, and May 2010 private placement debt agreements, with the ratio of debt to EBITDA,
as defined by the agreements, equal to 1.7 to 1.0. Additionally, the Companys October 2006
revolving loan agreement, as amended and extended in May 2008, requires the Company to maintain a
ratio of debt to trailing twelve months EBITDA, as defined by the debt agreement, of not more than
a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio. The revolving loan agreement requires the Companys trailing twelve months
earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expense of not less than a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio
(interest expense coverage). As of July 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial
covenants of the revolving loan agreement, with the ratio of debt to EBITDA, as defined by the
agreement, equal to 1.8 to 1.0 and the interest expense coverage ratio equal to 7.8 to 1.0.
52
Long-term obligations consist of the following as of July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Euro-denominated notes payable in 2017 at a fixed rate of 3.71% |
|
$ |
43,194 |
|
|
$ |
45,615 |
|
Euro-denominated notes payable in 2020 at a fixed rate of 4.24% |
|
|
64,791 |
|
|
|
52,132 |
|
USD-denominated notes payable through 2014 at a fixed rate of 5.14% |
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
USD-denominated notes payable through 2016 at a fixed rate of 5.30% |
|
|
130,714 |
|
|
|
156,857 |
|
USD-denominated notes payable through 2017 at a fixed rate of 5.33% |
|
|
98,229 |
|
|
|
114,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
393,178 |
|
|
$ |
444,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities |
|
$ |
(61,264 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,914 |
|
|
$ |
382,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of the Companys long-term obligations, based on the quoted market
prices for similar issues and on the current rates offered for debt of similar maturities, was
$416,694 and $467,479 at July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to the carrying
value of $393,178 and $444,204 at July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.
Maturities on long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending July 31, |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
61,264 |
|
2013 |
|
|
61,264 |
|
2014 |
|
|
61,264 |
|
2015 |
|
|
42,514 |
|
2016 |
|
|
42,514 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
124,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
393,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $1,466, and $1,564 at July 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
6. Stockholders Investment
|
|
Information as to the Companys capital stock at July 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
|
Authorized |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Authorized |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock: 6%
Cumulative |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1972 Series |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1979 Series |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting |
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
51,261,487 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
51,261,487 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
Class B Voting |
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,538,628 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,538,628 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before any dividend may be paid on the Class B Common Stock, holders of the Class A Common
Stock are entitled to receive an annual, noncumulative cash dividend of $.01665 per share.
Thereafter, any further dividend in that fiscal year must be paid on each share of Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock on an equal basis.
Other than as required by law, holders of the Class A Common Stock are not entitled to any
vote on corporate matters, unless, in each of the three preceding fiscal years, the $.01665
preferential dividend described above has not been paid in full. Holders of the Class A Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share for the entire fiscal year immediately following the third
consecutive fiscal year in which the preferential dividend is not paid in full. Holders of Class B
Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share for the election of directors and for all other
purposes.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and after distribution of any
amounts due to holders of Cumulative Preferred Stock, holders of the Class A Common Stock are
entitled to receive the sum of $0.835 per share before any payment or distribution to holders of
the Class B Common Stock. Thereafter, holders of the Class B Common Stock are entitled to receive a
payment or distribution of $0.835 per share. Thereafter, holders of the Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock share equally in all payments or distributions upon liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company.
53
The preferences in dividends and liquidation rights of the Class A Common Stock over the Class
B Common Stock will terminate at any time that the voting rights of Class A Common Stock and Class
B Common Stock become equal.
During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, the Companys Board of Directors authorized share
repurchase plans for the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. The share repurchase plans were
implemented by purchasing shares in the open market or privately negotiated transaction, with
repurchased shares available for use in connection with the Companys stock-based plans and for
other corporate purposes. The Company reacquired approximately 102,067, 1,345,000 and 1,349,000
shares of its Class A Common Stock for $2.5 million, $40.3 million and $42.2 million in fiscal
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in connection with its stock repurchase plans. The Company did
not reacquire any shares in fiscal 2011. As of July 31, 2011, there remained 204,133 shares to
purchase in connection with this share repurchase plan.
The following is a summary of other activity in stockholders investment for the years ended
July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
in Rabbi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Trust, at cost |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances at July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(6,182 |
) |
|
$ |
13,643 |
|
|
$ |
(12,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
690,539 |
|
|
|
690,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
Purchase of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(4,747 |
) |
|
$ |
13,282 |
|
|
$ |
(13,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
671,650 |
|
|
|
671,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Purchase of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(3,373 |
) |
|
$ |
12,848 |
|
|
$ |
(12,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,988 |
|
|
|
614,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Purchase of shares at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
(2,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,835 |
) |
Amortization of restricted stock |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(5,362 |
) |
|
$ |
12,093 |
|
|
$ |
(11,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,078 |
|
|
|
560,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to 2002, all Brady Corporation deferred compensation was invested in the Companys Class
A Nonvoting Common Stock. In 2002, the Company adopted a new deferred compensation plan which
allowed investing in other investment funds in addition to the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock. Under this plan, participants were allowed to transfer funds between the Companys Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock and the other investment funds. On May 1, 2006 the plan was amended with the
provision that deferrals into the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock must remain in the
Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and be distributed in shares of the Companys Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock. At July 31, 2011, the deferred compensation balance in stockholders
investment represents the investment at the original cost of shares held in the Companys Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock for the deferred compensation plan prior to 2002 and the investment at the
cost of shares held in the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock for the plan subsequent to
2002, adjusted for the plan amendment on May 1, 2006. The balance of shares held in the Rabbi Trust
represents the investment in the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock at the original cost of
all the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock held in deferred compensation plans.
The Companys Employee Monthly Stock Investment Plan (the Investment Plan) provides that
eligible employees may authorize a fixed dollar amount between $20 and $500 per month to be
deducted from their pay. The funds deducted are forwarded to the Investment Plan administrator and
are used to purchase the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock at the market price. As part of
the Investment Plan, Brady pays all brokerage fees for stock purchases and dividend reinvestments.
The Company has an incentive stock plan under which the Board of Directors may grant
nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock or restricted
shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to employees. Additionally, the Company has a nonqualified
stock option plan for non-employee directors under which stock options to purchase shares of Class
A Nonvoting Common Stock are available for grant. The options have an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant and generally vest ratably over a
three-year period, with one-third becoming exercisable one year after the grant date and one-third
additional in each of the succeeding two years. Options issued under these plans, referred to
herein as service-based options, generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. The Company
also grants stock options to certain executives
and key management employees that vest upon meeting certain financial performance conditions
over the vesting schedule described above. These options are referred to herein as
performance-based options. Performance-based stock options expire 10 years from the date of
grant. Restricted shares have an issuance price equal to the fair market value of the underlying
stock at the date of grant. The shares generally vest at the end of either a five-year or
seven-year period upon meeting certain financial performance conditions. These shares are referred
to herein as performance-based restricted shares.
54
As of July 31, 2011, the Company has reserved 5,799,017 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock for outstanding stock options and restricted shares and 737,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting
Common Stock remain for future issuance of stock options and restricted shares under the various
plans. The Company uses treasury stock or will issue new Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to deliver
shares under these plans.
Changes in the options are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Option Price |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
Balance, July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
9.59 $40.37 |
|
|
|
3,985,205 |
|
|
$ |
29.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
17.23 35.42 |
|
|
|
614,000 |
|
|
|
21.26 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
9.59 38.19 |
|
|
|
(138,934 |
) |
|
|
15.75 |
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
20.95 38.31 |
|
|
|
(479,665 |
) |
|
|
35.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
13.31-$40.37 |
|
|
|
3,980,606 |
|
|
$ |
27.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
24.78 33.28 |
|
|
|
1,446,500 |
|
|
|
29.08 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
14.16 31.54 |
|
|
|
(241,403 |
) |
|
|
18.16 |
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
15.28 38.31 |
|
|
|
(76,967 |
) |
|
|
31.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
13.31-$40.37 |
|
|
|
5,108,736 |
|
|
$ |
28.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
28.35 37.95 |
|
|
|
1,365,500 |
|
|
|
28.86 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
14.16 29.78 |
|
|
|
(417,888 |
) |
|
|
19.62 |
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
16.39 38.31 |
|
|
|
(330,331 |
) |
|
|
31.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
13.31 $40.37 |
|
|
|
5,726,017 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and
2009 was $6,822, $5,548, and $6,559, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $5,701, $3,004, and $2,156,
respectively.
There were 3,316,815, 3,100,955, and 2,831,311 options exercisable with a weighted average
exercise price of $29.83, $28.85, and $27.46 at July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. The
cash received from the exercise of options during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and
2009 was $8,193, $3,717, and $1,683, respectively. The tax benefit on options exercised during the
fiscal years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $682, $866, and $779, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at July 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding and |
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Outstanding at |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
at July 31, |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Price |
|
Up to $14.99 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.31 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
13.31 |
|
$15.00 to $29.99 |
|
|
3,900,515 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
26.68 |
|
|
|
1,516,313 |
|
|
|
24.07 |
|
$30.00 and up |
|
|
1,625,502 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
37.33 |
|
|
|
1,600,502 |
|
|
|
37.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,726,017 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
29.24 |
|
|
|
3,316,815 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value (defined as the amount by which the fair
value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of an option) of options outstanding and
the options exercisable was $14,864 and $11,727, respectively.
Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved an amendment to the fiscal 2008 performance-based restricted shares to provide for an
additional two year vesting period. These awards originally vested five years from the grant date
upon meeting certain financial performance and service conditions. This modification resulted in a
one-time,$1.2 million reduction in share-based compensation expense to align the expense
recognition with the amended vesting terms. The Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and the other three named executive officers currently have the
following performance-based restricted shares affected by this amendment: Frank M. Jaehnert,
50,000 shares; Thomas J. Felmer, 35,000 shares; Peter C. Sephton, 35,000 shares; Matthew O.
Williamson, 35,000 shares; and Robert L. Tatterson, 20,000 shares.
55
The Company granted 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock to Frank M. Jaehnert,
the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, in August of 2010, with a grant price and fair
value of $28.35. The Company also granted 210,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock
during fiscal 2008, with a grant price and fair value of $32.83. As of July 31, 2011, 310,000
performance-based restricted shares were outstanding.
The Company granted 465,000 performance-based stock options during fiscal 2011, with a
weighted average exercise price of $28.35 and a weighted average fair value of $9.87. The Company
also granted 900,500 service-based stock options during fiscal 2011, with a weighted average
exercise price of $29.13 and a weighted average fair value of $9.59.
7. Segment Information
The Company evaluates short-term segment performance based on segment profit or loss and
customer sales. Corporate long-term performance is evaluated based on shareholder value enhancement
(SVE), which incorporates the cost of capital as a hurdle rate for capital expenditures, new
product development, and acquisitions. Segment profit or loss does not include certain
administrative costs, such as the cost of finance, information technology, human resources, and
executive leadership which are managed as global functions. Restructuring charges, equity
compensation costs, interest, investment and other income and income taxes are also excluded when
evaluating segment performance.
The Company is organized and managed on a geographic basis by region. Each of these regions,
Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific, has a President that reports directly to the Companys chief
operating decision maker, its Chief Executive Officer. Each region has its own distinct operations,
is managed locally by its own management team, maintains its own financial reports and is evaluated
based on regional segment profit. The Company has determined that these regions comprise its
operating and reportable segments based on the information used by the Chief Executive Officer to
allocate resources and assess performance.
Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at cost plus a standard percentage markup.
Intercompany profit is eliminated in consolidation. It is not practicable to disclose
enterprise-wide revenue from external customers on the basis of product or service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
Total Region |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total Company |
|
Year ended July 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
577,428 |
|
|
$ |
404,955 |
|
|
$ |
357,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
41,638 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
69,192 |
|
|
|
(69,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
15,682 |
|
|
|
8,147 |
|
|
|
15,515 |
|
|
|
39,344 |
|
|
|
9,483 |
|
|
|
48,827 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
145,516 |
|
|
|
112,047 |
|
|
|
50,105 |
|
|
|
307,668 |
|
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
|
|
291,926 |
|
Assets |
|
|
735,003 |
|
|
|
333,977 |
|
|
|
389,465 |
|
|
|
1,458,445 |
|
|
|
403,060 |
|
|
|
1,861,505 |
|
Expenditures for property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
19,458 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
20,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
551,185 |
|
|
$ |
380,121 |
|
|
$ |
327,790 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
43,136 |
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
18,188 |
|
|
|
65,780 |
|
|
|
(65,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
21,142 |
|
|
|
8,088 |
|
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
44,979 |
|
|
|
8,043 |
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
125,169 |
|
|
|
103,316 |
|
|
|
52,105 |
|
|
|
280,590 |
|
|
|
(14,131 |
) |
|
|
266,459 |
|
Assets |
|
|
754,753 |
|
|
|
313,204 |
|
|
|
362,653 |
|
|
|
1,430,610 |
|
|
|
315,921 |
|
|
|
1,746,531 |
|
Expenditures for property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
8,502 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
19,983 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
26,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
534,440 |
|
|
$ |
367,156 |
|
|
$ |
307,106 |
|
|
$ |
1,208,702 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,208,702 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
45,853 |
|
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
|
68,697 |
|
|
|
(68,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
22,022 |
|
|
|
8,467 |
|
|
|
15,957 |
|
|
|
46,446 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
54,851 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
114,404 |
|
|
|
99,875 |
|
|
|
42,575 |
|
|
|
256,854 |
|
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
|
|
248,902 |
|
Assets |
|
|
703,559 |
|
|
|
298,717 |
|
|
|
341,605 |
|
|
|
1,343,881 |
|
|
|
239,386 |
|
|
|
1,583,267 |
|
Expenditures for property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
17,596 |
|
|
|
6,431 |
|
|
|
24,027 |
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total profit for reportable segments |
|
$ |
307,668 |
|
|
$ |
280,590 |
|
|
$ |
256,854 |
|
Corporate and eliminations |
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
|
|
(14,131 |
) |
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
Unallocated amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative costs |
|
|
(120,546 |
) |
|
|
(121,689 |
) |
|
|
(102,680 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(9,188 |
) |
|
|
(15,314 |
) |
|
|
(25,849 |
) |
Investment and other income net |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,124 |
) |
|
|
(21,222 |
) |
|
|
(24,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
144,058 |
|
|
|
109,402 |
|
|
|
97,272 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(35,406 |
) |
|
|
(27,446 |
) |
|
|
(27,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues* |
|
|
Long-Lived Assets** |
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
As of Years Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Geographic information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
535,412 |
|
|
$ |
521,318 |
|
|
$ |
510,703 |
|
|
$ |
488,571 |
|
|
$ |
507,481 |
|
|
$ |
519,932 |
|
China |
|
|
164,640 |
|
|
|
156,842 |
|
|
|
199,893 |
|
|
|
118,945 |
|
|
|
118,953 |
|
|
|
123,078 |
|
Other |
|
|
708,737 |
|
|
|
646,716 |
|
|
|
566,589 |
|
|
|
422,703 |
|
|
|
391,214 |
|
|
|
375,905 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(69,192 |
) |
|
|
(65,780 |
) |
|
|
(68,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total |
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,208,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,219 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Revenues are attributed based on country of origin. |
|
** |
|
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment, other intangible assets and
goodwill. |
57
8. Net Income Per Common Share
Net income per Common Share is computed by dividing net income (after deducting restricted
stock dividends and the applicable preferential Class A Common Stock dividends) by the weighted
average Common Shares outstanding of 52,639,355 for 2011, 52,402,387 for 2010, and 52,558,657 for
2009. The preferential dividend on the Class A Common Stock of $.01665 per share has been added to
the net income per Class A Common Share for all years presented.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance
addressing whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting, and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share. This guidance requires that all outstanding unvested share-based
payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends be considered participating
securities in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. The Company adopted the guidance
during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. As a result, the dividends on the Companys
performance-based restricted shares are included in the basic and diluted earnings per share
calculations for the respective periods presented.
Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per share
computations for the Companys Class A and Class B common stock are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (numerator for basic and diluted Class A net income per share) |
|
$ |
108,652 |
|
|
$ |
81,956 |
|
|
$ |
70,122 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock dividends |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted Class A net income per share |
|
$ |
108,429 |
|
|
$ |
81,809 |
|
|
$ |
69,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferential dividends |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
Preferential dividends on dilutive stock options |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted Class B net income per share |
|
$ |
107,603 |
|
|
$ |
80,982 |
|
|
$ |
69,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per share for both Class A and B |
|
|
52,639 |
|
|
|
52,402 |
|
|
|
52,559 |
|
Plus: effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share for both Class A and B |
|
|
53,133 |
|
|
|
52,946 |
|
|
|
52,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock net income per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
Class B common stock net income per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
Options to purchase 3,049,611, 2,832,337, and 2,764,308 shares of Class A common stock were
excluded from the computations of diluted net income per share for years ended July 31, 2011, 2010,
and 2009, respectively, because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has entered into various non-cancellable operating lease agreements. Rental
expense charged to operations on a straight-line basis was $22,213, $23,712, and $25,971 for the
years ended July 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Future minimum lease payments required
under such leases in effect at July 31, 2011 are as follows, for the years ending July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
18,350 |
|
2013 |
|
|
12,636 |
|
2014 |
|
|
10,667 |
|
2015 |
|
|
7,338 |
|
2016 |
|
|
5,478 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
In the normal course of business, the Company is named as a defendant in various lawsuits in
which claims are asserted against the Company. In the opinion of management, the liabilities, if
any, which may ultimately result from lawsuits are not expected to have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements of the Company.
58
10. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted new accounting guidance on fair value measurements on August 1, 2008 as it
relates to financial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the new accounting guidance on
fair value measurements for its nonfinancial assets and liabilities on August 1, 2009. The
accounting guidance applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, defines fair value based upon an exit price model, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands the applicable disclosure requirements. The accounting guidance
indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes that a transaction to sell an
asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the
absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a fair market value hierarchy
for the pricing inputs used to measure fair market value. The Companys assets and liabilities
measured at fair market value are classified in one of the following categories:
|
|
Level 1 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical instruments as of the reporting date. |
|
|
Level 2 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models for which
pricing inputs were either directly or indirectly observable. |
|
|
Level 3 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with
significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates. |
The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys
financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at July
31, 2011, and July 31, 2010, according to the valuation techniques the Company used to determine
their fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Considered as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Classification |
July 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities |
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
Other assets |
Foreign exchange contracts cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign exchange contracts net investment hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign currency denominated debt net
investment hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,985 |
|
|
Long term obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114,112 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities |
|
$ |
8,757 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,757 |
|
|
Other assets |
Foreign exchange contracts cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
8,757 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign currency denominated debt net
investment hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,747 |
|
|
Long term obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,640 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instrument:
|
|
Trading Securities: The Companys deferred compensation investments consist of investments in
mutual funds. These investments were classified as Level 1 as the shares of these investments
trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable the Company to obtain pricing information on
an ongoing basis. |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contacts: The Companys foreign currency exchange contracts were
classified as Level 2, as the fair value was based on the present value of the future cash flows
using external models that use observable inputs, such as interest rates, yield curves and
foreign currency exchange rates. See Note 12, Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional
information. |
|
|
Foreign currency denominated debt net investment hedge: The Companys foreign currency
denominated debt designated as a net investment hedge was classified as Level 2, as the fair
value was based on the present value of the future cash flows using external models that use
observable inputs, such as interest rates, yield curves and foreign currency exchange rates. See
Note 12, Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information. |
There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between the fair value hierarchy levels,
outlined above, during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Companys financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosures above,
include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
short-term and long-term debt. See Note 5, Long-Term Obligations for fair value of long-term
debt. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and
accrued liabilities approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these
instruments.
Disclosures for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are
recognized and disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, were required prospectively
beginning August 1, 2009. During fiscal 2011, the Company had no significant measurements of assets
or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition other
than for the acquisition of ID Warehouse and divestiture of the Teklynx business. See Note 2,
Acquisitions and Divestitures for further information. The Company also tested goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. See Note 1, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies for further information.
11. Restructuring
In fiscal 2009, in response to the global economic downturn, the Company took several measures
to address its cost structure. In addition to a company-wide salary freeze and decreased
discretionary spending, the Company reduced its workforce by 25%. The Company reduced its
workforce through voluntary and involuntary separation programs, voluntary retirement programs, and
facility consolidations. As a result of these actions, the Company recorded restructuring charges
of $25,849 in fiscal 2009. The restructuring charges included $21,279 of employee separation costs,
$2,101 of non-cash fixed asset write-offs, $1,194 of other facility
closure related costs, and $1,275
of contract termination costs. Of the $25,849 of
restructuring charges recorded during the year ended July 31, 2009, $13,928 was incurred in the
Americas, $7,730 was incurred in Europe, and $4,191 was incurred in Asia-Pacific.
In fiscal 2010, the Company continued the execution of its restructuring actions announced in
fiscal 2009. As a result of these actions, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $15,314
in fiscal 2010. The restructuring charges included $10,850 of employee separation costs, $2,260 of
non-cash fixed asset write-offs, $1,493 of other facility closure related costs, and $711 of
contract termination costs. Of the $15,314 of restructuring charges recorded during the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2010, $7,158 was incurred in the Americas, $5,350 was incurred in Europe, and
$2,806 was incurred in Asia-Pacific.
In fiscal 2011, the Company continued executing its restructuring actions initiated in
the prior periods and recorded restructuring charges of $9,188. The fiscal 2011 restructuring
charges consisted of $6,341 of employee separation costs, $2,155 of non-cash fixed asset
write-offs, $449 of other facility closure related costs, and $243 of contract termination costs.
Of the $9,188 of restructuring charges recorded during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, $5,445
was incurred in the Americas, $3,340 was incurred in Europe, and $403 was incurred in Asia-Pacific.
The costs related to these restructuring activities have been recorded on the consolidated
statements of income as restructuring charges. The Company expects the majority of the remaining
cash payments to be made within the next twelve months.
60
A reconciliation of the Companys restructuring activity for fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related |
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance, July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
21,279 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
25,849 |
|
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(2,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
Other separation benefits |
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(15,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(16,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
5,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
15,314 |
|
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(9,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,975 |
) |
|
|
(12,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
6,055 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
6,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,155 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(10,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
(10,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, July 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company utilizes forward foreign exchange currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate
risk of specific foreign currency denominated transactions and net investments. These contracts
typically require the exchange of a foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed rate at a future
date, with maturities of 18 months or less, which qualify as either cash flow hedges or net
investment hedges under the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
The primary objectives of the Companys foreign currency exchange risk management are to minimize
the impact of currency movements due to transactions in other than the respective subsidiaries
functional currency and to minimize the impact of currency movements on the Companys net
investment denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. To achieve this objective, the
Company hedges a portion of known exposures using forward foreign exchange currency contracts. As
of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, the notional amount of outstanding forward exchange contracts
was $80,807 and $45,328, respectively.
Hedge effectiveness is determined by how closely the changes in the fair value of the hedging
instrument offset the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting
is permitted only if the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective at the inception
of the hedge and on an on-going basis. Gains or losses on the derivative related to hedge
ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not
significant for the twelve-month periods ended July 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company hedges a portion of known exposure using forward exchange contracts. Main
exposures are related to transactions denominated in the British Pound, the Euro, Canadian Dollar,
Australian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Swiss Franc. Generally, these risk management transactions will
involve the use of foreign currency derivatives to protect against exposure resulting from sales
and identified inventory or other asset purchases.
The Company has designated a portion of its foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges and
recorded these contracts at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these instruments,
the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, unrealized losses of
$1,535 and $493 have been included in OCI, respectively. All balances are expected to be
reclassified from OCI to earnings during the next fifteen months when the hedged transactions
impact earnings.
At July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, the Company had $16 and $156 of forward exchange contracts
designated as cash flow hedges included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. At July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, the Company had $830
and $829, respectively, of forward exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges included in
Other current liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. At July 31, 2011 and
July 31, 2010, the U.S. dollar equivalent of these outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts
totaled $30,519 and $32,020, respectively, including contracts to sell Euros, Canadian Dollars,
Australian Dollars, British Pounds, U.S. Dollars, and Swiss Franc.
61
On May 13, 2010, the Company completed the private placement of 75.0 million aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured notes to accredited institutional investors. This
Euro-denominated debt obligation was designated as a net investment hedge to hedge portions of the
Companys net investment in Euro-denominated foreign operations. As net investment hedges, the
currency effects of the debt obligations are reflected in the foreign currency translation
adjustments component of accumulated other comprehensive income where they offset gains and losses
recorded on the Companys net investment in Euro-denominated operations. The Companys foreign
denominated debt obligations are valued under a market approach using publicized spot prices.
During the three and twelve month period ended July 31, 2011, the Company used forward foreign
exchange currency contracts designated as net investment hedges to hedge portions of the Companys
net investments in Euro-denominated foreign operations. For hedges that meet the effectiveness
requirements, the net gains or losses attributable to changes in spot exchange rates are recorded
in the foreign exchange translation adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income
where it offsets gains and losses recorded on the Companys net investment in Euro-denominated
foreign operations. Any ineffective portions are recognized in earnings. Recognition in earnings of
amounts previously recorded in cumulative translation is limited to circumstances such as complete
or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. At
July 31, 2011, the Company had $5,295 of forward foreign exchange currency contracts designated as
net investment hedges included in Other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
At July 31, 2011, the U.S dollar equivalent of these outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts
totaled $50,000. There were no forward foreign exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges outstanding as of July 31, 2010.
|
|
Fair values of derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Derivatives designated as |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
hedging instruments |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
5,295 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency denominated debt |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Long term obligations, less current maturities |
|
$ |
107,985 |
|
|
Long term obligations, less current maturities |
|
$ |
97,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,110 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pre-tax effects of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the
Consolidated Statements of Income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassified From |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
Into Income |
|
|
Income on |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Derivatives in |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
From Accumulated |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Derivative |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
Cash Flow Hedging |
|
As of July 31, |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(1,535 |
) |
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
(1,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,535 |
) |
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
The pre-tax effects of derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassified From |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Derivatives in |
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
Into Income |
|
|
Income on |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Net Investment |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
From Accumulated |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Derivative |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
Hedging |
|
As of July 31, |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(4,589 |
) |
|
$ |
6,248 |
|
|
Investment and other income net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Investment and other income net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency denominated debt |
|
$ |
(13,070 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,833 |
) |
|
Investment and other income net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Investment and other income net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(17,659 |
) |
|
$ |
3,415 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pre-tax effects of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on
the Consolidated Statements of Income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
in Income on |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(945 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(945 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
329,588 |
|
|
$ |
329,009 |
|
|
$ |
337,896 |
|
|
$ |
343,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,339,597 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
164,512 |
|
|
|
159,010 |
|
|
|
167,638 |
|
|
|
165,036 |
|
|
|
656,196 |
|
Operating Income* |
|
|
41,603 |
|
|
|
37,080 |
|
|
|
40,871 |
|
|
|
42,638 |
|
|
|
162,192 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
26,281 |
|
|
|
24,199 |
|
|
|
28,589 |
|
|
|
29,583 |
|
|
|
108,652 |
|
Net Income Per Class A Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
Diluted ** |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
318,486 |
|
|
$ |
295,829 |
|
|
$ |
321,887 |
|
|
$ |
322,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,096 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
157,443 |
|
|
|
146,918 |
|
|
|
160,197 |
|
|
|
158,739 |
|
|
|
623,297 |
|
Operating Income* |
|
|
35,557 |
|
|
|
23,902 |
|
|
|
35,914 |
|
|
|
34,083 |
|
|
|
129,456 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
21,668 |
|
|
|
15,001 |
|
|
|
23,695 |
|
|
|
21,592 |
|
|
|
81,956 |
|
Net Income Per Class A Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
Diluted ** |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Fiscal 2011 had before tax restructuring charges by quarter of $3,641, $2,134, $1,211, and
$2,202 for a total of $9,188. Fiscal 2010 had before tax restructuring charges by quarter of
$3,601, $3,649, $2,347, and $5,717 for a total of $15,314. |
|
** |
|
The sum of the quarters does not equal the year-to-date total due to rounding. |
63
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
|
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
Brady Corporation maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed by the Company
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its
President and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
The management of Brady Corporation and its subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles.
With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of July 31, 2011, based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2011, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting, as of July 31, 2011, has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is
included herein.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting,
misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are
subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the Companys most recently
completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
64
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Brady Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Brady Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of July 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying management report (Managements Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
and for the year ended July 31, 2011, of the Company and our report dated September 27, 2011,
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, WI
September 27, 2011
65
|
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
Other Information |
By unanimous written consent effective September 26, 2011, the holders of the
Companys Class B Common Stock, by unanimous written consent covering 100% of the 3,538,628
outstanding shares, approved the Brady Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (the 2012
Omnibus Plan). Under the terms of the 2012 Omnibus Plan, pursuant to which 5,500,000 shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock have been authorized for issuance, the Company may grant
unrestricted stock, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, shares of restricted stock
and restricted stock units to eligible employees and Directors of the Company and its affiliates.
The 2012 Omnibus Plan, which became effective upon shareholder approval, provides that after
December 31, 2011, no further awards or grants shall be made under the Companys 2010 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan or the Companys 2010 Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors. The foregoing description of the 2012 Omnibus Plan does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2012 Omnibus Plan,
which is filed as Exhibit 10.38 to this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
Forms of granting agreements under the 2012 Omnibus Plan are filed as Exhibits 10.39, 10.40. and
10.41 to this Form 10-K.
PART III
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
|
Title |
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
President, CEO and Director |
Thomas J. Felmer
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Senior V.P., CFO |
Stephen Millar
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
President Brady Asia-Pacific and V.P., Brady Corporation |
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
President Brady Europe and V.P., Brady Corporation |
Matthew O. Williamson
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
President Brady Americas and V.P., Brady Corporation |
Allan J. Klotsche
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Senior V.P. Human Resources |
Robert L. Tatterson
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
V.P. and Chief Technology Officer |
Bentley N. Curran
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
V.P. and Chief Information Officer |
Kathleen M. Johnson
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
V.P. and Chief Accounting Officer |
Aaron J. Pearce
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
V.P. and Treasurer |
Conrad G. Goodkind
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director |
Elizabeth Pungello
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director |
Frank W. Harris
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Director |
Chan W. Galbato
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Director |
Patrick W. Allender
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director |
Bradley C. Richardson
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director |
Gary S. Balkema
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
Frank M. Jaehnert Mr. Jaehnert has served on the Companys Board of Directors and as the
Companys President and CEO since 2003. Mr. Jaehnert joined the Company in 1995 and served in
leadership positions in a variety of different functions and businesses, including that of CFO from
1996 to 2002, before his promotion to President and CEO in 2003. Previously, he served in a variety
of financial roles at Robert Bosch, GmbH, including treasurer of a subsidiary. His broad operating
and functional experience and in-depth knowledge of Bradys businesses are particularly valuable
given the diverse nature of Bradys portfolio. These experiences, combined with Mr. Jaehnerts
talent for leadership and his long-term strategic perspective, have helped drive the Companys
growth and performance during his tenure as Director and CEO.
Thomas J. Felmer Mr. Felmer joined the Company in 1989 and has held several sales and
marketing positions until being named Vice President and General Manager of Bradys U.S. Signmark
Division in 1994. In 1999, Mr. Felmer moved to Europe where he led the European Signmark business
for two years, then gained additional responsibility for the European direct marketing businesses,
which he also led for two years. In 2003, Mr. Felmer returned to the United States where he was
responsible for Bradys global sales and marketing processes, Brady Software businesses, and
integration leader of the EMED acquisition. In June 2004, he was appointed President-Direct
Marketing Americas, and was named Chief Financial Officer in January 2008.
Stephen Millar Mr. Millar joined the Company in 1999 as Managing Director of Brady
Australia, a position he held until 2008 when he joined Brady Americas leadership team as
Vice-President and General Manager responsible for its portfolio of people identification, medical
and education businesses. In 2010, he returned to Asia in the role of MRO Director for the region.
He was appointed to his current position, President-Brady Asia Pacific in March 2011. Prior to
joining Brady, Mr. Millar served in a variety of leadership positions in Australia and New Zealand
with GNB Technologies, a global manufacturer of automotive and industrial
batteries. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce and Administration degree from Victoria University
of Wellinton, New Zealand and is a member of the institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand.
66
Peter C. Sephton Mr. Sephton joined the Company in 1997 as Managing Director Seton-U.K.
From 2001 to 2003 he served as managing director for Bradys Identification Solutions Business in
Europe. In April 2003, he was appointed to his current position, President-Brady Europe. Before
joining Brady, he served in a variety of international managerial roles with Tate and Lyle Plc,
Sutcliffe Speakman Plc and Morgan Crucible Plc. He is a graduate in accountancy and law from The
University of Wales (UCC).
Matthew O. Williamson Mr. Williamson joined the Company in 1979. From 1979 to 1994, he
served in a variety of sales and marketing leadership roles. From 1995 to 2003, Mr. Williamson
served as the V.P. and General Manager of Bradys specialty tape and identification solution
businesses. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Williamson served as the V.P. and General Manager of the
Identification Solutions and Specialty Tapes Division. From 1998 to 2001, he served as V.P. and
General Manager of the Identification Solutions Division. From 2001 to 2003, he served as V.P. and
General Manager of the Global High Performance Identification Business. In April 2003, he was
appointed President of the Brady Americas business. In addition to his role as President of the
Brady Americas business, in January of 2008, Mr. Williamson assumed responsibility for the Direct
Marketing Americas, and is currently serving as President of the Americas region. He holds a BBA
in marketing from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Allan J. Klotsche Mr. Klotsche joined the Company in 1989. He served in a variety of sales,
marketing, technical, and management roles until 1998, when he was appointed V.P. and General
Manager of the Precision Tapes Group. He served as President Brady Asia Pacific from 2003 until
his current appointment as Senior Vice President leading Bradys global human resource function in
October 2010. Mr. Klotsche also serves as President of the Brady Corporation Foundation. He holds
an MBA from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Robert L. Tatterson Dr. Tatterson joined the Company in 2006 as Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer. Before joining Brady, he held a variety of positions with increasing
responsibility at GE since 1992. Most recently, Dr. Tatterson served as Technology General Manager
for GE Plastics Display and Optical Film business in Mt. Vernon, Indiana. He is a 6 Sigma Master
Blackbelt and holds a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
Bentley N. Curran Mr. Curran joined the Company in 1999 as global information technology
director charged with building and deploying a common technology infrastructure. Prior to joining
Brady, he held various management and consultant positions for Compucom and Speed Queen Company. He
is a graduate of Marian University and holds a bachelor of business degree and an associate of
science degree in electronics and engineering systems.
Kathleen M. Johnson Ms. Johnson joined the Company in 1989 as controller of a division of
Brady and became group finance director in 1996. In 2000 she was appointed Vice President. In 2008
she was appointed Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining Brady, she spent six years with Kraft
Food Service. She started her career as a CPA with Deloitte & Touche LLP. She holds a bachelors
degree in accounting from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Aaron J. Pearce Mr. Pearce joined the Company in 2004 as Director of Internal Audit. From
2006 to 2008, he served as Finance Director for Bradys Asia Pacific Region. From 2008 to 2009, he
served as the Global Tax Director. In January 2010, he assumed the role of Treasurer and Director
of Investor Relations. Prior to Brady, Mr. Pearce was with Deloitte & Touche LLP and started his
career in banking. He holds a bachelors degree in business administration from the University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is a certified public accountant.
Conrad G. Goodkind Mr. Goodkind was elected to the Board of Directors in 2007. He currently
serves as Bradys Lead Independent Director. He also serves as the Chair of the Corporate
Governance Committee and as a member of the Finance Committee. He previously served as Secretary of
the Company from 1999 to 2007. Mr. Goodkind was a partner in the law firm of Quarles & Brady, LLP,
where his practice concentrated in corporate and securities law from 1979 to 2009. Prior to 1979,
he served as Wisconsins Deputy Commissioner of Securities. Mr. Goodkind previously served as a
director of Cade Industries, Inc. and Able Distributing, Inc. His extensive experience in advising
companies on a broad range of transactional matters, including mergers and acquisitions and
securities offerings, and historical knowledge of the Company provides the Board with expertise and
insight into governance, business and compliance issues that the Company encounters.
Elizabeth Pungello, Ph. D Dr. Pungello was elected to the Board of Directors in 2003. She
serves as a member of the Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Technology Committees. Dr.
Pungello is a Scientist at the Frank Porter Graham Development Institute, a Research Assistant
Professor in the Developmental Psychology Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, and Mentor Faculty at the Center for Developmental Science. She serves on the editorial board
of the Journal of Marriage and Family and as a reviewer for several other journals. Dr. Pungello is
the President of the Brady Education Foundation in
Chapel Hill, N.C. and serves on a number of other non-profit boards. She is the granddaughter
of William H. Brady, Jr., the founder of Brady Corporation. As a result of her substantial
ownership stake in the Company, as well as her familys history with the Company, she is well
positioned to understand, articulate and advocate for the rights and interests of the Companys
shareholders.
67
Frank W. Harris, Ph.D Dr. Harris was elected to the Board of Directors in 1991. He serves
as the Chair of the Technology Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. He
served as the Distinguished Professor of Polymer Science and Biomedical Engineering at the
University of Akron from 1983 to 2008 and Professor of Chemistry at Wright State University from
1970 to 1983. He is the founder of several technology based companies including Akron Polymer
Systems where he serves as President and CEO. Dr. Harris is the inventor of several commercialized
products including an optical film that realized over one billion dollars in sales. His extensive
experience in technology and engineering solutions provides the Board with important expertise in
new product development.
Chan W. Galbato Mr. Galbato was elected to the Board of Directors in 2006. He serves as
chairman of the Compensation Committee and is a member of the Audit and Technology Committees. He
has extensive executive leadership experience including his current role as a senior operating
executive with Cerberus Operations and Advisory Company, LLC. Mr. Galbato was President and CEO of
the Controls division of Invensys plc. Prior to that, Mr. Galbato held positions as President of
Services at The Home Depot, President and CEO of Armstrong Floor Products, CEO of Choice Parts LLC,
and CEO of Coregis Insurance Company, a GE Capital company. Mr. Galbato is Chairman of the Board of
Blue Bird Corporation and North American Bus Industries, Inc., Guilford Mills, Inc., and NewPage
Corporation and is a member of the Board of Tower International, Inc. His public company leadership
experience gives him insight into business strategy, leadership and executive compensation and his
public company and private equity experience give him insight into technology trends, acquisition
strategy and financing, each of which represents an area of key strategic opportunity for the
Company.
Patrick W. Allender Mr. Allender was elected to the Board of Directors in 2007. He serves
as the Chair of the Finance Committee and as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees. He
served as Executive Vice President and CFO of Danaher Corporation from 1998 to 2005 and Executive
Vice President from 2005 to 2007. Additionally, he served as a public accountant at Arthur Andersen
LLC from 1968 to 1985. He has served as a director of Colfax Corporation since 2008 and Diebold,
Inc. since May 2011. Mr. Allenders strong background in finance and accounting, as well as his
past experience as the CFO of a public company, provides the Board with financial expertise and
insight.
Bradley C. Richardson Mr. Richardson was elected to the Board of Directors in 2007. He
serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Finance Committee. He is the
Executive Vice President and CFO of Diebold, Inc. He previously served as the Executive Vice
President Corporate Strategy and CFO of Modine Manufacturing from 2003 to 2009. Prior to Modine, he
spent 21 years with BP Amoco serving in various financial and operational roles with assignments in
North America, South America, and Europe. Mr. Richardson has served on the boards of Modine
Manufacturing and Tronox, Inc. He brings to the Company extensive knowledge and experience in the
areas of operations, strategy, accounting, tax accounting, and finance, which are areas of critical
importance to the Company as a global public company.
Gary S. Balkema Mr. Balkema was elected to the Board of Directors in 2010. From 2000 to
2011, he served as the President of Bayer Healthcare LLC and Worldwide Consumer Care Division,
which has four billion dollars in sales and over 5,400 employees. He was also responsible for
overseeing Bayer LLC USAs compliance program. He has over 20 years of general management
experience. Mr. Balkema brings strong experience in consumer marketing skills and mergers and
acquisitions and integrations. His broad operating and functional experience are valuable to the
Company given the diverse nature of the Companys portfolio.
All directors serve until their respective successors are elected at the next annual meeting
of shareholders. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. None of the Companys
directors or executive officers has any family relationship with any other director or executive
officer.
Board Leadership Structure The Board does not have a formal policy regarding the separation
of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in
the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of
the Company and the membership of the Board. The Board currently has not appointed a Chairman of
the Board. In fiscal 2010, the Board formalized the position of Lead Independent Director, which is
elected on an annual basis from among the independent Directors of the Board based upon the
recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee. The duties of the Lead Independent Director
include, among others, chairing executive sessions of the non-management Directors, meeting
periodically with the Chief Executive Officer on current significant issues facing the Company,
facilitating effective communication among the Chief Executive Officer and all members of the
Board, and overseeing the Boards shareholder communication policies and procedures. Mr. Goodkind,
Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, currently serves as the Lead Independent Director.
68
The Board believes that its current leadership structure has enhanced the Boards oversight
of, and independence from, Company management; the ability of the Board to carry out its roles and
responsibilities on behalf of our shareholders; and our overall corporate governance.
Risk Oversight The Board oversees the Companys risk management processes directly and
through its committees. In general, the Board oversees the management of risks inherent in the
operation of the Companys businesses, the implementation of its strategic plan, its acquisition
and capital allocation program and its organizational structure. Each of the Boards committees
also oversees the management of Company risks that fall within the committees areas of
responsibility. The Companys management is responsible for reporting significant risks to
executives at the quarterly disclosure committee meeting. The significance of the risk is assessed
by executive management and escalation to the respective board committee and Board of Directors is
determined. The Company reviews its risk assessment with the Audit Committee annually.
Audit Committee Financial Expert The Companys Board of Directors has determined that at
least one Audit Committee financial expert is serving on its Audit Committee. Messrs. Richardson,
Chair of the Audit Committee, and Allender and Galbato, members of the Audit Committee, are
financial experts and are independent as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A
under the Exchange Act.
Director Independence A majority of the directors must meet the criteria for independence
established by the Board in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. In
determining the independence of a director, the Board must find that a director has no relationship
that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independence from management and the Company.
Based on these guidelines all directors, with the exception of Mr. Jaehnert, President and CEO, are
deemed independent. All members of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance Committees are
deemed independent.
Meetings of Non-management Directors The non-management directors of the Board regularly
meet alone without any members of management present. Mr. Goodkind, Lead Independent Director and
Chair of Corporate Governance Committee, is the presiding Director at these sessions. In fiscal
2011, there were 6 executive sessions. Interested parties can raise concerns to be addressed at
these meetings by calling the confidential Brady hotline at 1-800-368-3613.
Audit Committee Members The Audit Committee, which is a separately-designated standing
committee of the Board of Directors, is composed of Mr. Richardson (Chairman), Mr. Galbato, and Mr.
Allender. Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board to be independent
under the rules of the SEC and NYSE. The charter for the Audit Committee is available on the
Companys corporate website at www.bradycorp.com.
Code of Ethics For a number of years, the Company has had a code of ethics for its
employees. This code of ethics applies to all of the Companys employees, officers and Directors.
The code of ethics can be viewed at the Companys corporate website, www.bradycorp.com, or may be
obtained in print by any person, without charge, by contacting Brady Corporation, Investor
Relations, P.O. Box 571, Milwaukee, WI 53201. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure
requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision
of its code of ethics by placing such information on its Internet website.
Corporate Governance Guidelines Bradys Corporate Governance Principles, as well as the
charters for the Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation Committee, are
available on the Companys Corporate website, www.bradycorp.com. Shareholders may request printed
copies of these documents from Brady Corporation, Investor Relations, P.O. Box 571, Milwaukee, WI
53201.
Director Qualifications Bradys Corporate Governance Committee reviews the individual
skills and characteristics of the Directors, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole.
This assessment includes a consideration of independence, diversity, age, skills, expertise, and
industry backgrounds in the context of the needs of the Board and the Company. Although the Company
has no policy regarding diversity, the Corporate Governance Committee seeks a broad range of
perspectives and considers both the personal characteristics and experience of Directors and
prospective nominees to the Board so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate
talent, skills, and expertise to oversee the Companys businesses.
69
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and
persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to
file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock
and other equity securities of the Company. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten
percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Companys knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished
to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2011, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers,
directors and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were complied with, other than with respect
to the following:
|
|
|
Thomas J. Felmers Form 4 filing on October 27, 2010 contained one transaction made
on October 21, 2010 that was inadvertently reported late. |
|
|
|
Gary S. Balkemas Form 4 filing on February 22, 2011 reported the acquisition of
2,000 shares made on September 14, 2010 that was inadvertently reported late. |
|
|
|
Each of the Form 4 filings made on October 4, 2010 on behalf of Conrad G. Goodkind,
Bradley C. Richardson, Frank W. Harris, Patrick W. Allender, Elizabeth P. Pungello, Chan
W. Galbato, and Gary S. Balkema contained one transaction made on September 24, 2010 that
was inadvertently reported late. |
70
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the compensation philosophy, policies and
practices of the Company with respect to its executives and management. The following information
and analyses focuses primarily on the compensation provided to the Companys principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and its other three most highly compensated executives, who
are collectively referred to in this section as the named executive officers. Bradys named
executive officers are Frank M. Jaehnert, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director; Thomas
J. Felmer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Peter C. Sephton, President Brady
Europe and Vice President, Brady Corporation; Robert L. Tatterson, Vice President R&D and Chief
Technology Officer; and Matthew O. Williamson, President Brady Americas and Vice President,
Brady Corporation.
Executive Compensation Overview and Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain exceptional leadership
talent and properly incentivize them to create a top-tier performance company by encouraging
behaviors and actions that build long-term value for our shareholders. We have structured our
compensation program around the following principles:
|
a) |
|
Provide a competitive total compensation package to attract and retain exceptional
leadership talent. |
|
b) |
|
Incentivize long-term shareholder value creation by encouraging behaviors to facilitate
long-term success without undue risk taking. |
|
c) |
|
Reinforce top-tier company performance through a merit-based, pay-for-performance culture
that is in-line with the Companys values. |
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring and
approving the compensation of the Companys named executive officers. In compliance with this
responsibility, the Committee annually reviews the individual performance of these executives and
approves any changes in their base salary, the payment of an annual cash incentive and grant of
equity awards. The Committee periodically utilizes the services of an independent executive
compensation consulting firm to assist with the review and evaluation of compensation levels and
policies. Their expertise may also be utilized in modifying any existing or proposing any new
compensation arrangements. During fiscal 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of
an independent compensation consultant; however, the total fees for the consultants services did
not exceed $120,000. The Committee considers this professional advice and other available
competitive information and data in making executive compensation decisions. The Committee is
flexible in the application of this information and does not rely on rigid guidelines or formulas
when determining or modifying executive compensation.
In order to successfully achieve our Company objectives, a combination of short-term and
long-term incentives has been developed. The Compensation Committee believes a proper balance
between these elements is necessary and should include a combination of cash and equity, with fixed
and performance-based components. Our short-term incentive is in the form of cash, while the
long-term incentive is equity based and includes performance-based and time-based stock options,
along with performance-based restricted shares. These programs are designed to provide a balance
between annual Company performance and the generation of long-term shareholder value. We also
believe these programs further enhance the performance of the Company by providing effective tools
to attract, retain, and motivate a group of highly skilled executives. This results in strong
financial and operational performance, which supports the preservation and enhancement of
shareholder value over time, without incurring undue risk to our shareholders.
Annually, the Chief Executive Officer recommends a proposal to the Compensation Committee for
compensation for each named executive officer other than himself, with respect to whom the
Compensation Committee formulates and determines compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews
the proposal for each officer and ultimately approves a compensation arrangement for them. The
resulting approved compensation levels, including the President and Chief Executive Officers
compensation, are then reported by the Compensation Committee to the full Board of Directors.
71
Elements of Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2011
As noted above, it is the Compensation Committees philosophy that an executive compensation
program should be used to promote both the short and long-term financial objectives of the Company,
encourage the executives to act in the long-term best interest of the Company and attract and
retain people who are qualified, motivated and committed to excellence. The Compensation Committee
believes this can be accomplished through compensation programs that provide a balanced mix of
performance-based cash and equity compensation. The annual bonus and equity compensation plans
provide incentives commensurate with performance.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the overall level of compensation, as
well as the various elements of compensation for each of the named executive officers. In addition
to the specific process discussed below for base salaries, annual cash incentives and long-term
equity compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews individual comprehensive total compensation
summaries that include the annual cash and equity grants, along with all other benefits over a
trailing four-year period.
Base Salary
Individual performance and competitiveness in the market are key components in determining
base salary and any changes in base salary. On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee obtains
compensation surveys from nationally recognized compensation consultants to assist in understanding
compensation levels in the marketplace. A regression analysis is then performed based on the
appropriate organization level (company, group, division) and sales volume of the appropriate Brady
business. The base salary is designed to compensate executives for their level of responsibility
and sustained individual performance. One consideration is the comparison of the individual base
salaries to the median for like positions and responsibilities based on these nationally recognized
compensation surveys. Further, the Compensation Committee has flexibility to increase base salaries
above the median to retain or attract key employees whose performance merits higher base salaries,
or to set base salary below the median where individuals are new to the job and performance is
being evaluated. The Compensation Committee annually reviews base salaries to ensure, on the basis
of responsibility and performance, that executive compensation is meeting the Compensation
Committees principles. The determination of base salary also affects the annual bonus payout since
an individuals annual bonus target is expressed as a percentage of base salary.
In addition to the nationally recognized compensation surveys, the Compensation Committee has
historically used peer group data for similar positions nationally to test the reasonableness and
competitiveness of several components of compensation, including base salaries, annual incentives,
and long term incentives by position. The Compensation Committee also uses judgment to determine
the appropriate level of base salary, which we believe reflects individual performance and
responsibilities, and calibrates with the most recently available market compensation data. A total
compensation benchmarking analysis of our industry and selected peer companies, which resulted in a
modified listing of peer group companies, was conducted by an outside consultant and assisted the
Compensation Committee in the review of fiscal 2011 compensation levels for the named executive
officers. The criteria utilized by the Committee to determine the group of peer companies included
revenue size, industry, financial performance relative to the S&P 600 and the availability of
information.
The peer group utilized in setting fiscal 2011 compensation levels included 30 companies that
are in a similar industry with annual revenues up to approximately $5 billion: A.O. Smith
Corporation, Actuant Corporation, Ameron International Corporation, AMETEK, Inc., Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc., Cubic Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Dentsply International Inc.,
Donaldson Company, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Graco Inc., Greif, Inc., Herman Miller Inc., Hexcel
Corporation, HNI Corporation, IDEX Corporation, Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc., Matthews
International Corporation, MetroPCS Communications Inc., Mine Safety Appliances Company, MSC
Industrial Direct Company, Inc., Plexus Corporation, Rayonier Inc., Regal Beloit Corporation,
Snap-On Inc., Temple Inland Inc., Thomas & Betts Corporation, Toro Corporation, Tupperware Brands
Corporation and Warnaco Group Inc. This list may vary in the future due to changes in our business
or the business of the companies utilized as peers.
As a result of the benchmarking study conducted during the summer of 2010, it was determined
by the Compensation Committee that fiscal 2011 base salary merit increases for the named executive
officers would range from 3.2% to 7.2%.
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus
All named executive officers participate in an annual cash incentive plan, which is primarily
based on fiscal year financial results. The largest component of the plan is corporate earnings per
share growth. Other components include consolidated organic sales growth, segment organic sales
growth, segment profit, and working capital improvement. Each component is based on the
individuals role at either the corporate or segment level.
72
As part of the annual review of compensation, the Compensation Committee takes into account
total annual cash compensation in the marketplace. Salary, combined with annual target bonus
levels that have been established as a percentage of salary, are intended to approximate the median
of the market total annual cash compensation, as defined in nationally recognized compensation
surveys. Annual bonus payouts will vary above or below the targeted amount based on the actual
performance of the Company during the fiscal year. Payouts for the Companys named executives can
range from 0% to 250% of the target based on the performance of the Company and the segment for
which they are responsible. The management team recommends performance targets for the annual
incentive plans which are aligned with the performance of our peer group. After review of these
recommendations, the Compensation Committee sets the final targets ensuring they are aligned
externally and support a balance between annual Company performance and the generation of long-term
shareholder value. The plan is designed so that current fiscal year results must exceed prior year
results before any payout is made. In the event that current year results do not exceed prior
year, as was the case in fiscal year 2009, named executive officers will not be eligible for a cash
incentive bonus. An employee must also hold a position within the Company on the last day of the
fiscal year to be eligible to receive a bonus payment.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the components of these plans, the required
performance levels at each target payout level, the calculation of the individual bonus awards, and
also monitors projected bonus payouts throughout the year once the targets are set. Sales and net
income must exceed the prior year in order for these components of the bonus plan to pay out.
The individual incentive target amounts are set at a percentage of base salary and the target
amounts are larger for individuals with greater levels of responsibility. The target bonus
percentage for Mr. Jaehnert is 100% of his base salary, and for Messrs. Felmer, Sephton, Tatterson
and Williamson are 70% of their base salaries. The following table provides the components of the
target bonus percentages for fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Working |
|
|
Segment Organic |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Organic |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Profit |
|
|
Target |
|
Name |
|
Sales Growth |
|
|
Growth |
|
|
Improvement |
|
|
Growth (1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Payout |
|
Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
Peter C. Sephton |
|
NA |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
Robert L. Tatterson |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
Matthew O. Williamson |
|
NA |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Segment sales and profit for Messrs. Sephton and Williamson are based on organic sales
growth and profit for their respective segment excluding the impact of currency. |
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, the Company paid the following annual cash incentive
bonuses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
|
Salary % |
|
Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
|
1,632,548 |
|
|
|
205.8 |
% |
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
|
523,349 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
% |
Peter C. Sephton |
|
|
341,190 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
Robert L. Tatterson |
|
|
462,338 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
% |
Matthew O. Williamson |
|
|
462,461 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
% |
The 2011 allocation of the annual cash incentive bonuses by component is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Earnings Per |
|
|
Working |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Name |
|
Organic Sales |
|
|
Share (1) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Organic Sales |
|
|
Segment Profit |
|
|
Payout |
|
Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
250.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
205.8 |
% |
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
250.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
205.8 |
% |
Peter C. Sephton |
|
NA |
|
|
|
250.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
136.6 |
% |
Robert L. Tatterson |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
250.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
205.8 |
% |
Matthew O. Williamson |
|
NA |
|
|
|
250.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
62.8 |
% |
|
|
168.0 |
% |
|
|
183.5 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings per share as utilized in the individual bonus plans is calculated using a fixed
amount of 53 million shares. Weighted average diluted shares
outstanding were 53.1 million
for fiscal year 2011. |
73
Targets and actual performance for the above mentioned bonus plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Component |
|
Target |
|
|
Actual Performance |
|
Total Company Organic Sales Growth |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Segment Organic Sales Growth |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
3.1% - 4.7 |
% |
Total Company Earnings per Share Growth |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
32.6 |
% |
Segment Profit Growth |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
8.4% - 16.8 |
% |
Total Company Working Capital Improvement |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Segment Working Capital Improvement |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
0.0% - 4.0 |
% |
Effective September 1, 2011, the holders of the Companys Class B Common Stock approved an
amendment to the Brady Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan For Elected Corporate Officers (the
Current Plan) increasing the annual limitation on bonus awards granted to any participant under
the Current Plan from $1.5 million to $2.0 million. In addition, the holders of the Companys Class
B Common Stock approved the Brady Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Senior Executives
(the New Plan), which is intended to replace the Current Plan beginning with fiscal 2012 awards.
For fiscal 2012, the Company will place a greater emphasis on organic sales growth. As a
result, the corporate and regional bonus plans were modified to increase the weight of the organic
sales component, remove working capital improvement as a component of the plan and replace earnings
per share growth with net income growth.
Equity Incentives: Long-term Incentive Compensation
The Company utilizes a combination of performance-based stock options, time-based stock
options and performance-based restricted shares to attract, retain, and motivate key employees who
directly impact the long-term performance of the Company. A combination of performance-based stock
options, time-based stock options and performance-based restricted shares is utilized to provide a
balance between annual Company performance and the generation of long-term shareholder value.
Equity-based plans are influenced by Bradys stock price, which directly affects the amount of
compensation the executive receives upon exercising the options. The size and type of equity awards
is determined by the Compensation Committee with periodic input from its outside consultant. A
study by the Committees external compensation consultant was recently conducted and assisted the
Compensation Committee in the review of fiscal 2011 long-term incentive awards for the named
executive officers.
By unanimous written consent effective September 24, 2010, the holders of the Companys Class
B Common Stock approved an amendment to the Brady Corporation 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan
(the 2010 Omnibus Plan). Under the terms of the amended 2010 Omnibus Plan, the maximum number of
equity awards that could be granted to a participant in a calendar year was increased from 200,000
to 400,000 shares.
By unanimous written consent effective September 26, 2011, the holders of the Companys Class
B Common Stock approved the Brady Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (the 2012 Omnibus
Plan). Under the terms of the 2012 Omnibus Plan, pursuant to which 5,500,000 shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock have been authorized for issuance, the Company may grant
unrestricted stock, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, shares of restricted stock
and restricted stock units to eligible employees and Directors of the Company and its affiliates.
The 2012 Omnibus Plan, which became effective upon shareholder approval, provides that no further
grants will be made under the Companys 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan after December 31, 2011.
Performance-based Stock Options:
The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based stock options serve as an important
motivator and a required component of the Companys overall compensation program.
Performance-based stock options were granted in fiscal 2011 with two vesting criteria. The
performance criterion for two-thirds of the performance-based options is based upon annual earnings
per share growth targets, while the performance criterion for the remaining one-third of the
performance-based options is based upon a relative measure of the Companys three year earnings per
share growth compared to the S&P 600 Index. These options have a ten year life and were granted on
the first working day of the Companys fiscal year.
In July 2011, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance-based stock options
to be granted during fiscal 2012 would include vesting criteria based upon year over year diluted
EPS growth, including an opportunity to vest over a two or three year period if the compound annual
growth rate exceeds the annual target.
74
Time-based Stock Options:
Time-based stock option grants in fiscal 2011 were reviewed and approved by the Compensation
Committee on September 8, 2010, with an effective grant date of September 24, 2010. The grant price
was the fair market value of the stock on the grant date, which was calculated as the average of
the high and low stock price on that date. The time-based stock options generally vest one-third
each year for the first three years and have a ten-year life.
Performance-based Restricted Stock:
Periodically, the Company issues restricted stock grants to key executives as an element of
their overall compensation. In January 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of
performance-based restricted stock awards to six of Bradys senior executives. A total of 210,000
restricted shares were issued and included both a performance vesting requirement (earnings per
share) and a service vesting requirement (five years). In addition to the original vesting
criteria, the restricted stock awards were amended effective July 20, 2011 to include an additional
vesting opportunity based upon earnings per share growth for the fiscal years ending July 31, 2013
or July 31, 2014, and a service vesting requirement through July 31, 2014.
Based upon input from an external compensation consultant and the Committees desire to
provide an incentive for retention and improved Company performance, effective August 2, 2010, a
grant of 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock was issued to Mr. Jaehnert. This
grant of performance-based restricted stock included both a performance vesting requirement based
upon earnings per share growth and a service vesting requirement prorated at July 31, 2013, July
31, 2014 and July 31, 2015.
Employment and Post-Employment Benefits
General Benefits:
The named executive officers receive the same basic benefits that are offered by the Company
to other employees, including medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance.
Retirement Benefits:
Brady employees (including named executive officers) in the United States and certain
expatriate employees working for its international subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the
Brady Corporation Matched 401(k) Plan (the Employee 401(k) Plan). In addition, named executive
officers in the United States and employees at many of our United States locations are also
eligible to participate in the Brady Corporations Funded Retirement Plan (Funded Retirement
Plan). The Company agrees to contribute certain amounts to both Plans. Under the Funded Retirement
Plan, the Company contributes 4% of the eligible earnings of each employee covered by the Funded
Retirement Plan. In addition, participants may elect to have their annual pay reduced by up to 5%
and have the amount of this reduction contributed to their 401(k) Plan and matched by an additional
4% contribution by the Company. Participants may also elect to have up to another 45% of their
eligible earnings contributed to the Employee 401(k) Plan (without an additional matching
contribution by the Company). The assets of the Employee 401(k) Plan and Funded Retirement Plan
credited to each participant are invested by the trustee of the Plans as directed by each plan
participant in a variety of investment funds as permitted by the Employee 401(k) Plan and the
Funded Retirement Plan.
Due to the IRS income limitations for participating in the Employee 401(k) Plan and the Funded
Retirement Plan, the named executive officers are eligible to participate in the Brady Restoration
Plan, which is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows an equivalent benefit to the
Employee 401(k) Plan and the Funded Retirement Plan for their income above the IRS participation
limits.
Benefits are generally payable upon the death, disability, or retirement of the participant,
or upon termination of employment before retirement, although benefits may be withdrawn from the
employee 401(k) Plan and paid to the participant if required for certain emergencies. Under certain
specified circumstances, the employee 401(k) Plan allows loans to be drawn on a participants
account. The participant is immediately fully vested with respect to employee contributions; all
other contributions become fully vested over a two-year period of continuous service for the
employee 401(k) Plan and after six years of continuous service for the Funded Retirement Plan.
75
Deferred Compensation Arrangements During fiscal 2002, the Company adopted the Brady
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Executive Deferred Compensation Plan), under
which executive officers, corporate staff officers and certain
key management employees of the Company are permitted to defer portions of their salary and
bonus into a plan account, the value of which is measured by the fair value of the underlying
investments. The assets of the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are held in a Rabbi Trust and
are invested by the trustee as directed by the participant in several investment funds as permitted
by the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The investment funds available in the Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan include Brady Corporation Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and various
mutual funds that are provided in the Employee 401(k) Plan. On May 1, 2006, the plan was amended to
require that deferrals into the Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock must remain in the
Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and be distributed in shares of the Companys Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock.
At least one year prior to termination of employment, the executive must elect whether to
receive their account balance following termination of employment in a single lump sum payment or
by means of distribution under an Annual Installment Method. If the executive does not submit an
election form or has not submitted one timely, then payment shall be made each year for a period of
ten years. The first payment must be one-tenth of the balance held; the second one-ninth; and so
on, with the balance held in the Rabbi Trust reduced by each payment. Distributions of the Company
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock are made in-kind; distributions of other assets are in cash.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was amended and restated
to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts deferred prior
to January 1, 2005 (which were fully vested under the terms of the plan), including past and future
earnings credited thereon, will remain subject to the terms in place prior to January 1, 2005.
76
Perquisites:
Brady provides the named executive officers with the following perquisites that are not
available to other non-executive employees:
|
|
|
Annual allowance for financial and tax planning |
|
|
|
Enhanced long-term disability insurance |
|
|
|
Long-term care insurance |
|
|
|
Personal liability insurance |
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We believe that the interests of shareholders and executives become aligned when executives
become shareholders in possession of a meaningful amount of Company stock. Furthermore, this stock
ownership encourages positive performance behaviors and discourages executive officers from taking
undue risk. In order to encourage our executive officers and directors to acquire and retain
ownership of a significant number of shares of the Companys stock, stock ownership guidelines have
been established.
The Board of Directors has established the following stock ownership guidelines for our named
executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
100,000 shares |
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
30,000 shares |
Peter C. Sephton |
|
30,000 shares |
Robert L. Tatterson |
|
30,000 shares |
Matthew O. Williamson |
|
30,000 shares |
The stock ownership guideline for each director is 5,000 shares of Company stock.
Mr. Jaehnert met his respective ownership levels in 2011. Named executive officers other than
the Companys CEO have until fiscal year 2013 to achieve their respective ownership levels. If an
executive does not meet the above ownership level or certain interim levels, the Compensation
Committee may direct that the executives after-tax payout on any incentive plans will be in Class
A Nonvoting Common Stock to bring the executive up to the required level. The Compensation
Committee reviews the actual stock ownership levels of each of the named executive officers on an
annual basis to ensure the guidelines are met.
For purposes of determining whether an executive meets the required ownership level, Company
stock owned outright, Company stock held in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and Company
stock owned in the Employee 401(k) Plan or pension plan is included. In addition, twenty percent of
any vested stock options that are in the money are included.
Employment and Change of Control Agreements
The Board of Directors of Brady Corporation approved change of control agreements for certain
executive officers of the Company, including all the named executive officers. The agreements
applicable to all of the named executive officers other than Mr. Jaehnert provide a payment of an
amount equal to two times their annual base salary and two times the average bonus payment received
in the three years immediately prior to the date the change of control occurs in the event of
termination or resignation upon a change of control. The agreements also provides for reimbursement
of any excise taxes imposed and up to $25,000 of attorney fees to enforce the executives rights
under the agreement. Payments under the agreement will be spread over two years.
In May 2003, the Board approved a Change of Control Agreement for Mr. Jaehnert, which was
subsequently amended and restated in December 2008 to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section
409A. The agreement applicable to Mr. Jaehnert provides a payment of an amount equal to three times
his annual base salary and three times the average bonus payment received in the three years
immediately prior to the date the change of control occurs in the event of termination or
resignation upon a change of control. The agreement will also reimburse a maximum of $25,000 of
legal fees incurred by Mr. Jaehnert in order to enforce the change of control agreement, in which
he prevails. Payments under the agreement will be spread over three years.
77
Compliance with Tax Regulations Regarding Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1993, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid
to the Companys chief executive officer and the other named executive officers. Qualifying
performance-based compensation will not be subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements
are met. The Companys executive compensation program, as currently constructed, is not likely to
generate significant nondeductible compensation in excess of these limits. The Compensation
Committee will continue to review these tax regulations as they apply to the Companys executive
compensation program. It is the Compensation Committees intent to preserve the deductibility of
executive compensation to the extent reasonably practicable and to the extent consistent with its
other compensation objectives.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2011, the Boards Compensation Committee was composed of board members Allender,
Buchanan, Galbato and Pungello. None of these persons has at any time been an employee of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries. Mr. Buchanans Board services ended on November, 18, 2010.
There are no relationships among the Companys executive officers, members of the Compensation
Committee or entities whose executives serve on the Board that require disclosure under applicable
SEC regulations.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
with management; and based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to
the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K.
Chan W. Galbato, Chairman
Patrick W. Allender
Elizabeth P. Pungello
Compensation Policies and Practices
The Companys compensation policies for executive officers and all other employees are
designed to avoid incentives to create undue risks to the Company. The Companys compensation
programs are weighted towards offering long-term incentives that reward sustainable performance; do
not offer significant short-term incentives that might drive high-risk investments at the expense
of the long-term Company value; and are set at reasonable and sustainable levels, as determined by
a review of the Companys economic position, as well as the compensation offered by comparable
companies. The Companys compensation policies and practices were evaluated to ensure that they do
not foster risk taking above the level of risk associated with the Companys business model. The
Company has also reviewed its compensation policies and practices and determined they will not
create risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
78
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named
executive officers, who served as executive officers during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 for
services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011,
July 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Name And Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($)(2) |
|
|
($)(3) |
|
|
($)(4) |
|
|
($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
793,269 |
|
|
|
2,803,500 |
|
|
|
2,470,157 |
|
|
|
1,632,548 |
|
|
|
223,329 |
|
|
|
7,922,803 |
|
President & |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
768,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,868,047 |
|
|
|
1,193,891 |
|
|
|
127,590 |
|
|
|
3,957,797 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,761 |
|
|
|
1,319,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
363,285 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
914,386 |
|
|
|
523,349 |
|
|
|
93,163 |
|
|
|
1,872,133 |
|
Senior Vice President & |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
339,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,224 |
|
|
|
369,481 |
|
|
|
65,242 |
|
|
|
1,607,606 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
318,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,322 |
|
|
|
578,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.C. Sephton (4) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
356,818 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
790,878 |
|
|
|
341,190 |
|
|
|
92,158 |
|
|
|
1,558,994 |
|
President Brady Europe |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
334,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,224 |
|
|
|
188,441 |
|
|
|
118,801 |
|
|
|
1,475,293 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
325,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,787 |
|
|
|
607,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.L. Tatterson |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
320,935 |
|
|
|
(12,600 |
) |
|
|
667,370 |
|
|
|
462,338 |
|
|
|
75,398 |
|
|
|
1,513,441 |
|
Vice President R&D & |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
307,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659,100 |
|
|
|
334,210 |
|
|
|
45,579 |
|
|
|
1,346,124 |
|
Chief Technology Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,321 |
|
|
|
527,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.O. Williamson |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
360,071 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
790,878 |
|
|
|
462,461 |
|
|
|
73,093 |
|
|
|
1,664,453 |
|
President Brady Americas |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
343,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,224 |
|
|
|
234,505 |
|
|
|
53,695 |
|
|
|
1,464,668 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
326,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,265 |
|
|
|
586,818 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with accounting guidance for
equity grants made or modified in the applicable year for restricted stock awards. The grant
date fair value is calculated based on the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the
restricted stock awards, times the average of the high and low trade prices of Brady Common
Stock on the date of grant. The actual value of a restricted stock award will depend on the
market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date the stock is sold. The restricted stock
award granted on January 8, 2008 was amended effective July 20, 2011 so that the shares will
vest upon meeting a performance vesting requirement based upon earnings per share growth at
either July 31, 2013 or July 31, 2014, provided that the senior executives meet the service
vesting requirement of an additional two years. The reduction in the incremental fair value of
the restricted share grant as of the modification date is included in the table above. |
|
|
|
Effective August 2, 2010, a grant of 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock was
issued to Mr. Jaehnert, which included both a performance vesting requirement based upon
earnings per share growth and a service vesting requirement prorated at July 31, 2013, July 31,
2014 and July 31, 2015. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with accounting guidance for
equity grants made or modified in the applicable year for performance-based and time-based
stock options. The assumptions used to determine the value of the awards, including the use of
the Black-Scholes method of valuation by the Company, are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for
the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011. The actual value, if any, which an option holder will
realize upon the exercise of an option will depend on the excess of the market value of the
Companys Common Stock over the exercise price on the date the option is exercised, which
cannot be forecasted with any accuracy. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects incentive plan compensation earned during the listed fiscal years, which was paid
during the next fiscal year. Consistent with the Companys incentive compensation plan, there
were no bonuses paid to executives for fiscal year 2009 because Company performance did not
exceed fiscal year 2008 levels. |
79
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this column for Messrs. Jaehnert, Felmer, Sephton, Tatterson and Williamson
include: matching contributions to the Companys Matched 401(k) Plan, Funded Retirement Plan
and Restoration Plan, the costs of group term life insurance for each named executive officer,
use of a Company car and associated expenses, the cost of long-term care insurance, the cost
of personal liability insurance, the cost of disability insurance and other perquisites. The
perquisites may include an annual allowance for financial and tax planning and the cost of an
annual physical health exam. The amounts in this column for Mr. Sephton include: contributions
for the Brady U.K. Pension Plan, the cost of group term life insurance, vehicle allowance and
associated expenses and other perquisites as listed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Temporary/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Company |
|
|
Care |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Contributions |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Car |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
158,281 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
24,057 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
23,760 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
223,329 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
61,923 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
28,070 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
23,760 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
127,590 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
116,284 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
27,698 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
23,760 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
179,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
57,931 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
25,311 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
|
93,163 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
27,157 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
29,995 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
65,242 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
32,528 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
26,401 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
65,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.C. Sephton(4) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
57,091 |
|
|
|
3,267 |
|
|
|
31,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,158 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
85,162 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
30,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,801 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
52,114 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
32,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.L. Tatterson |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
50,793 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
16,074 |
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
75,398 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
25,966 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
13,560 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
45,579 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
42,132 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
14,974 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
66,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. O. Williamson |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
47,059 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
14,436 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,277 |
|
|
|
73,093 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
27,648 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
16,422 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
53,695 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
40,038 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
18,309 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
65,265 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this table for Mr. Sephton, who works and lives in the United Kingdom, were
paid to him in British Pounds. The amounts shown in U.S. dollars in the table above were
converted from British Pounds at the average exchange rate for fiscal 2011: $1 = £0.6250,
2010: $1 = £0.6358, fiscal 2009: $1 = £0.6294. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2011
The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made during fiscal 2011 to the
named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
or Base |
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
Price of |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compen- |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
or |
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sation |
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Under- |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
|
|
or |
|
|
lying |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Approval |
|
|
Threshold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Awards |
|
Name |
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Target ($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(2)(3) & (4) (#) |
|
|
($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
8/1/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,269 |
|
|
|
1,983,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
2,835,000 |
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
1,473,548 |
|
|
|
|
9/24/2010 |
|
|
|
9/8/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
996,609 |
|
|
|
|
1/8/2008 |
|
|
|
7/20/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(31,500 |
) |
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
8/1/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,300 |
|
|
|
635,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
515,742 |
|
|
|
|
9/24/2010 |
|
|
|
9/8/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
398,644 |
|
|
|
|
1/8/2008 |
|
|
|
7/20/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
P.C. Sephton |
|
|
8/1/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,773 |
|
|
|
624,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
442,064 |
|
|
|
|
9/24/2010 |
|
|
|
9/8/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
348,813 |
|
|
|
|
1/8/2008 |
|
|
|
7/20/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
R.L. Tatterson |
|
|
8/1/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,654 |
|
|
|
561,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
368,387 |
|
|
|
|
9/24/2010 |
|
|
|
9/8/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
298,983 |
|
|
|
|
1/8/2008 |
|
|
|
7/20/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(12,600 |
) |
M.O. Williamson |
|
|
8/1/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,050 |
|
|
|
630,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2010 |
|
|
|
7/19/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
28.35 |
|
|
|
442,064 |
|
|
|
|
9/24/2010 |
|
|
|
9/8/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
348,813 |
|
|
|
|
1/8/2008 |
|
|
|
7/20/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
80
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The awards were made under the Companys annual cash incentive plan. The structure of the
plan is described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. Award levels are set
prior to the beginning of the fiscal year and payouts can range from 0% to 250% of the target. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective August 2, 2010, a grant of 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock was
issued to Mr. Jaehnert, which included both a performance vesting requirement based upon
earnings per share growth and a service vesting requirement prorated at July 31, 2013, July
31, 2014 and July 31, 2015. |
|
(3) |
|
The performance-based stock options granted on August 2, 2010 become exercisable as follows:
Two-thirds of the shares vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period, with the
vesting date being the date the Audit Committee accepts the results of the fiscal year audit
confirming the achievement of annual EPS growth levels. The remaining one-third of the shares
vest at plan year three depending upon the Corporations EPS growth for fiscal 2013 over
fiscal 2010 in comparison with other corporations in the S&P 600 Index. The time-based stock
options granted on September 24, 2010 become exercisable as follows: one-third of the shares
on September 24, 2011, one-third of the shares on September 24, 2012 and one-third of the
shares on September 24, 2013. These options have a term of ten years and were calculated using
the grant date fair value. |
|
(4) |
|
Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved an amendment to the granting agreement under which the Company issued
performance-based restricted stock on January 8, 2008. In addition to the original vesting
criteria, the shares may also vest upon meeting certain financial performance criteria for the
fiscal years ending July 31, 2013 or July 31, 2014, provided that the senior executives meet
the service vesting requirement of an additional two years. The average of the high and low
trade prices of the Companys Class A Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange
on the a date of the performance-based restricted stock was $32.20, and the incremental
reduction in the fair value of the grant as of the modification date is reported within the
table above. |
|
(5) |
|
The exercise price is the average of the high and low sale prices of the Companys Class A
Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant. The average
of the high and low sale prices of the Companys Class A Common Stock as reported by the New
York Stock Exchange on the grant dates was $28.35 per share on August 2, 2010 and $29.10 on
September 24, 2010. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards; |
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Market or Payout |
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, Units or |
|
|
Value of Unearned |
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Rights |
|
|
Shares, Units or |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Have Not |
|
|
Other Rights That |
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Have Not Vested |
|
Name |
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Options (#) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3100 |
|
|
|
2/24/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250 |
|
|
|
11/20/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6325 |
|
|
|
8/2/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425 |
|
|
|
11/18/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8900 |
|
|
|
8/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300 |
|
|
|
11/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900 |
|
|
|
11/30/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3100 |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,334 |
|
|
|
16,666 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9500 |
|
|
|
12/4/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,334 |
|
|
|
99,166 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.7800 |
|
|
|
8/3/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
46,666 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7300 |
|
|
|
9/25/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3500 |
|
|
|
8/2/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1000 |
|
|
|
9/24/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
(4) |
|
|
1,480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
(8) |
|
|
2,960,000 |
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards; |
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Market or Payout |
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, Units or |
|
|
Value of Unearned |
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Rights |
|
|
Shares, Units or |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Have Not |
|
|
Other Rights That |
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Have Not Vested |
|
Name |
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Options (#) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0000 |
|
|
|
10/16/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875 |
|
|
|
11/14/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250 |
|
|
|
11/20/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6325 |
|
|
|
8/2/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425 |
|
|
|
11/18/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8900 |
|
|
|
8/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300 |
|
|
|
11/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900 |
|
|
|
11/30/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3100 |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
8,333 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9500 |
|
|
|
12/4/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
40,833 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.7800 |
|
|
|
8/3/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
23,333 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7300 |
|
|
|
9/25/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3500 |
|
|
|
8/2/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1000 |
|
|
|
9/24/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(4) |
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.C. Sephton |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250 |
|
|
|
11/20/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6325 |
|
|
|
8/2/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425 |
|
|
|
11/18/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8900 |
|
|
|
8/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300 |
|
|
|
11/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900 |
|
|
|
11/30/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3100 |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
8,333 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9500 |
|
|
|
12/4/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
40,833 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.7800 |
|
|
|
8/3/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
23,333 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7300 |
|
|
|
9/25/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3500 |
|
|
|
8/2/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1000 |
|
|
|
9/24/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(4) |
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Tatterson |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900 |
|
|
|
11/30/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3100 |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
8,333 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9500 |
|
|
|
12/4/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.7800 |
|
|
|
8/3/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7300 |
|
|
|
9/25/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3500 |
|
|
|
8/2/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1000 |
|
|
|
9/24/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
(4) |
|
|
592,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.O. Williamson |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875 |
|
|
|
11/14/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250 |
|
|
|
11/20/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6325 |
|
|
|
8/2/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425 |
|
|
|
11/18/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8900 |
|
|
|
8/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300 |
|
|
|
11/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900 |
|
|
|
11/30/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3100 |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
8.333 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9500 |
|
|
|
12/4/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
40,833 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.7800 |
|
|
|
8/3/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
23,333 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7300 |
|
|
|
9/25/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3500 |
|
|
|
8/2/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1000 |
|
|
|
9/24/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(4) |
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted for a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend, effective
December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
All shares vest on December 4, 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
Two-thirds of the shares vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period, with the
vesting date being the date the Audit Committee accepts the results of the fiscal year audit
confirming the achievement of annual EPS growth levels. The remaining one-third of the shares
vest at plan year three depending upon the Corporations EPS growth for fiscal 2012 over
fiscal 2008 in comparison with other corporations in the S&P 600 Index. |
|
(4) |
|
Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved an amendment to the granting agreement under which the Company issued
performance-based restricted stock on January 8, 2008. Pursuant to the amendment, the shares
will vest upon meeting a financial performance vesting requirement at either July 31, 2013 or
July 31, 2014, provided that the senior executives meet the service vesting requirement of an
additional two years. |
|
(5) |
|
One-half of the options vest on September 25, 2011 and one-half of the options vest on
September 25, 2012. |
82
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Two-thirds of the shares vest in equal installments over a three-year period, with the
vesting date being the date the Audit Committee accepts the results of the fiscal year audit
confirming the achievement of annual EPS growth levels. The remaining one-third of the shares
vest at plan year three depending upon the Corporations EPS growth for fiscal 2013 over
fiscal 2010 in comparison with other corporations in the S&P 600 Index. |
|
(7) |
|
One-third of the options vest on September 24, 2011, one-third of the options vest on
September 24, 2012, and one-third of the options vest on September 24, 2013. |
|
(8) |
|
Effective August 2, 2010, a grant of 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock was
issued to Mr. Jaehnert, which included both a performance vesting requirement based upon
earnings per share growth and a service vesting requirement prorated at July 31, 2013, July
31, 2014 and July 31, 2015. |
Option Exercises for Fiscal 2011
The following table summarizes option exercises completed during fiscal 2011 to the named
executive officers. No shares of restricted stock held by the named executive officers vested in
fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on |
|
|
Value Realized |
|
Name |
|
Exercise (#) |
|
|
on Exercise ($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
1,518,095 |
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
128,760 |
|
P.C. Sephton |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
R.L. Tatterson |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
M.O. Williamson |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
83
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2011
The following table summarizes the activity within the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
and the Brady Restoration Plan during fiscal 2011 for the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Contributions in |
|
|
Contributions in |
|
|
Earnings in |
|
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
End ($) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
69,648 |
|
|
|
138,681 |
|
|
|
424,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,844,683 |
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
322,045 |
|
|
|
37,870 |
|
|
|
169,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,332,339 |
|
P.C. Sephton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.L. Tatterson |
|
|
51,057 |
|
|
|
32,115 |
|
|
|
41,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,877 |
|
M.O. Williamson |
|
|
13,561 |
|
|
|
27,121 |
|
|
|
75,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,419 |
|
See discussion of the Companys nonqualified deferred compensation plan in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis. The executive contribution amounts reported here are derived from the
salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table. The
registrant contribution amounts reported here are reported in the all other compensation columns of
the Summary Compensation Table.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
As described in the Employment and Change of Control Agreements section of the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis above, the Company has entered into change of control agreements with each
of the named executive officers. The terms of the change of control agreement are triggered if,
within a 24 month period beginning with the date a change of control occurs, (i) the executives
employment with the Company is involuntarily terminated other than by reason of death, disability
or cause or (ii) the executives employment with the Company is voluntarily terminated by the
executive subsequent to (a) any reduction in the total of the executives annual base salary,
exclusive of fringe benefits, and the executives target bonus in comparison with the executives
annual base salary and target bonus immediately prior to the date the change of control occurs, (b)
a significant diminution in the responsibilities or authority of the executive in comparison with
the executives responsibility and authority immediately prior to the date the change of control
occurs, or (c) the imposition of a requirement by the Company that the executive relocate to a
principal work location more than 50 miles from the executives principal work location immediately
prior to the date the change of control occurs.
Following termination due to a change in control, executives shall be paid a multiplier of
their annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the date the change of control occurs, plus
a multiplier of their average bonus payment received over a three-year period prior to the date the
change of control occurs. The Company will also reimburse the executive for any excise tax incurred
by the executive as a result of Section 280(G) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company will also
reimburse a maximum of $25,000 of legal fees incurred by the executive in order to enforce the
change of control agreement, in which the executive prevails.
The following information and tables set forth the amount of payments to each named executive
officer in the event of termination of employment as a result of a change of control. No other
employment agreements have been entered into between the Company and any of the named executive
officers.
Assumptions and General Principles.
The following assumptions and general principles apply with respect to the tables that follow
in this section.
|
|
|
The amounts shown in the tables assume that each named executive officer terminated
employment on July 31, 2011. Accordingly, the tables reflect amounts earned as of July 31,
2011, and include estimates of amounts that would be paid to the named executive officer
upon the occurrence of a change in control. The actual amounts that would be paid to a named
executive officer can only be determined at the time of termination. |
|
|
|
The tables below include amounts the Company is obligated to pay the named executive
officer as a result of the executed change in control agreement. The tables do not include
benefits that are paid generally to all salaried employees or a broad group of salaried
employees. Therefore, the named executive officers would receive benefits in addition to
those set forth in the tables. |
|
|
|
A named executive officer is entitled to receive base salary earned during his term of
employment regardless of the manner in which the named executive officers employment is
terminated. As such, this amount is not shown in the tables. |
84
Frank M. Jaehnert
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the terms of the change of control
agreement were triggered on July 31, 2011 and the named executive officer had to legally enforce
the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Excise Tax |
|
|
Legal Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1) |
|
Bonus ($) (2) |
|
|
Gain $(3) |
|
|
Gain $ (4) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
1,897,445 |
|
|
|
4,440,000 |
|
|
|
422,260 |
|
|
|
1,663,980 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
10,848,685 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents three times the base salary in effect at July 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents three times the average bonus payment received in the last three fiscal years
ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on 150,000 unvested awards that would vest due
to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on 313,332 unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Thomas J. Felmer
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the terms of the change of control
agreement were triggered on July 31, 2011 and the named executive officer had to legally enforce
the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Excise Tax |
|
|
Legal Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1) |
|
Bonus ($) (2) |
|
|
Gain $(3) |
|
|
Gain $ (4) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
740,000 |
|
|
311,739 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
178,006 |
|
|
|
358,880 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
2,649,625 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the last three fiscal years ended
July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on 35,000 unvested awards that would vest due
to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on 124,166 unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
85
Peter C. Sephton
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the terms of the change of control
agreement were triggered on July 31, 2011 and the named executive officer had to legally enforce
the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Excise Tax |
|
|
Legal Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1) |
|
Bonus ($) (2) |
|
|
Gain $(3) |
|
|
Gain $ (4) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
721,636 |
|
|
300,562 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
166,131 |
|
|
|
322,231 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
2,571,560 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31, 2011. As Mr. Sephton works and
lives in the United Kingdom, his base salary is paid to him in British Pounds. The amount
shown in U.S. dollars was converted from British Pounds at the July 2011 month-end exchange
rate: $1 = £0.6358. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the last three fiscal years ended
July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on 35,000 unvested awards that would vest due
to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on 111,666 unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Robert L. Tatterson
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the terms of the change of control
agreement were triggered on July 31, 2011 and the named executive officer had to legally enforce
the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Excise Tax |
|
|
Legal Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($) (1) |
|
Bonus ($) (2) |
|
|
Gain $ (3) |
|
|
Gain $ (4) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
650,000 |
|
|
373,905 |
|
|
|
592,000 |
|
|
|
151,356 |
|
|
|
315,928 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
2,108,189 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the last three fiscal years ended
July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on 20,000 unvested awards that would vest due
to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on 95,833 unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
86
Matthew O. Williamson
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the terms of the change of control
agreement were triggered on July 31, 2011 and the named executive officer had to legally enforce
the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
Excise Tax |
|
|
Legal Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($) (1) |
|
Bonus ($) (2) |
|
|
Gain $ (3) |
|
|
Gain $ (4) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
730,000 |
|
|
278,610 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
166,131 |
|
|
|
347,133 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
2,582,874 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the last three fiscal years ended
July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on 35,000 unvested awards that would vest due
to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on 111,666 unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Potential Payments Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability
In the event of termination due to death or disability, all unexercised, unexpired stock
options would immediately vest and all restricted stock awards would immediately become
unrestricted and fully vested. The following table shows the amount payable to the named executive
officers should this event occur on July 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
In-the |
|
|
Stock Option |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Award Acceleration |
|
|
Money as of |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
Name |
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
Gain $ (1) |
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
Gain $ (2) |
|
F.M. Jaehnert |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
4,440,000 |
|
|
|
313,332 |
|
|
|
422,260 |
|
T.J. Felmer |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
124,166 |
|
|
|
178,006 |
|
P.C. Sephton |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
111,666 |
|
|
|
166,131 |
|
R.L. Tatterson |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
592,000 |
|
|
|
95,833 |
|
|
|
151,356 |
|
M.O. Williamson |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
111,666 |
|
|
|
166,131 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the closing market price of $29.60 on unvested shares that would vest due to the
change in control. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of $29.60 and the exercise price
on unvested stock options in-the-money that would vest due to death or disability. |
87
Compensation of Directors
To ensure competitive compensation for the Directors, surveys prepared by various consulting
firms and the National Association of Corporate Directors are reviewed by the Corporate Governance
Committee and the Compensation Committee in making recommendations to the Board of Directors
regarding Director compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional
compensation for service on the Board or on any committee of the Board. The annual cash retainer
paid to non-management Directors is $45,000. The remaining components of Director compensation
include $6,000 for each committee chair ($10,000 for the Audit Committee Chair) and $1,500 plus
expenses for each meeting of the Board or any committee thereof, which they attend and are a member
or $1,000 for single issue telephonic committee meetings of the Board. Directors also receive
$1,000 for each meeting they attend of any committee for which they are not a member and $500 for
each telephonic committee meeting they attend of any committee for which they are not a member. In
addition, non-management Directors are eligible to receive compensation of up to $1,000 per day for
special assignments required by management or the Board of Directors, so long as the compensation
does not impair independence and is approved as required by the Board.
On September 9, 2011, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized an increase in
compensation paid to its non-management Directors. Effective with the annual Board of Directors
meeting to be held on November 17, 2011, the annual committee chair fees will increase from $6,000
to $10,000 for each of the Chairs of the Compensation, Corporate Governance, Finance, and
Technology Committees and from $10,000 to $15,000 for the Chair of the Audit Committee.
On November 18, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Corporation, upon the recommendation of
its Corporate Governance Committee, increased the annual Lead Independent Director fee from $10,000
to $15,000. The current chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, Mr. Conrad Goodkind, is
serving as the Lead Independent Director.
By unanimous written consent effective September 26, 2011, the holders of the Companys Class
B Common Stock approved the Brady Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (the 2012 Omnibus
Plan). Under the terms of the 2012 Omnibus Plan, pursuant to which 5,500,000 shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock have been authorized for issuance, the Board has full and final
authority to designate the non-management Directors to whom awards will be granted, the date on
which awards will be granted and the number of shares of stock covered by each grant. On September
9, 2011, the Board approved an annual stock-based compensation award of approximately $75,000, half
in time-based stock options and half in unrestricted shares of Class A Common Stock, for each
non-management Director effective September 30, 2011.
Directors are also eligible to defer portions of their fees into the Brady Corporation
Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Director Deferred Compensation Plan), the value of which is
measured by the fair value of the underlying investments. On September 9, 2011, the Board approved
an amendment to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan to incorporate rules for the deferral of
compensation payable in the form of Brady Corporation common stock. The assets of the Director
Deferred Compensation Plan are held in a Rabbi Trust and are invested by the trustee as directed by
the participant in several investment funds as permitted by the Director Deferred Compensation
Plan. The investment funds available in the Director Deferred Compensation Plan include Brady
Corporation Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and various mutual funds that are provided in the
Employee 401(k) Plan.
At least one year prior to termination from the Board, the Director must elect whether to
receive his/her account balance following termination in a single lump sum payment or by means of
distribution under an Annual Installment Method. If the Director does not submit an election form
or has not submitted one timely, then payment shall be made each year for a period of ten years.
The first payment must be one-tenth of the balance held; the second one-ninth; and so on, with the
balance held in the Trust reduced by each payment. Distributions of the Company Class A Nonvoting
Common Stock are made in-kind; distributions of other assets are in cash.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Director Deferred Compensation Plan was amended and restated to
comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
88
Director
Compensation Table Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Cash ($) |
|
|
Awards ($) (1) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
Elizabeth P. Pungello |
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
154,600 |
|
Robert C. Buchanan (2) |
|
|
27,250 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
110,850 |
|
Frank W. Harris |
|
|
75,500 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
159,100 |
|
Chan W. Galbato |
|
|
93,500 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
177,100 |
|
Patrick W. Allender (3) |
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
176,100 |
|
Conrad G. Goodkind |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
183,600 |
|
Bradley C. Richardson |
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
83,600 |
|
|
|
170,600 |
|
Gary S. Balkema |
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
181,739 |
|
|
|
258,739 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with accounting guidance for
equity grants made in the applicable year for time-based stock options. The assumptions used
to determine the value of the awards, including the use of the Black-Scholes method of
valuation by the Company, are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July
31, 2011. The grant date fair value of options granted in fiscal 2011 was $83,600 for Ms.
Pungello, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Harris, Mr. Galbato, Mr. Allender, Mr. Goodkind, and for Mr.
Richardson. |
|
|
|
The grant date fair value of options granted in fiscal 2011 was $181,739 for Mr. Balkema, who in
addition to the grant received by the other non-management Directors, also received a grant of
10,000 options two weeks after the date he joined the Board. The actual value, if any, which an
option holder will realize upon the exercise of an option will depend on the excess of the market
value of the Companys common stock over the exercise price on the date the option is exercised,
which cannot be forecasted with any accuracy. |
|
|
|
Outstanding option awards at July 31, 2011 for each individual serving as a director on that date
include the following: Ms. Pungello, 52,800 shares; Mr. Harris, 52,800 shares; Mr. Galbato,
38,800 shares; Mr. Allender, 38,800 shares; Mr. Goodkind, 38,800 shares; Mr. Richardson, 32,800
shares; and Mr. Balkema, 18,400. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Buchanans Board services ended on November 18, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes $5,000 paid for special assignments. |
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership of shareholders who are known
by the Company to own more than five percent (5%) of any class of the Companys voting shares on
August 15, 2011. As of that date, nearly all of the voting stock of the Company was held by two
trusts controlled by direct descendants of the Companys founder, William H. Brady, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Title of Class |
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Ownership |
|
|
Ownership(2) |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
Brady Corporation Class B Common Stock Trust(1) |
|
|
1,769,304 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
c/o Elizabeth P. Pungello |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 S. Hawick Ct. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapel Hill, NC 27516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Brady III Revocable Trust of 2003(3) |
|
|
1,769,304 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
c/o William H. Brady III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 Rosemont Ave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasadena, CA 91103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The trustee is Elizabeth P. Pungello, who has sole voting and dispositive power and who is
the remainder beneficiary. Elizabeth Pungello is the great-granddaughter of William H. Brady
and currently serves on the Companys Board of Directors. |
|
(2) |
|
An additional 20 shares are owned by a third trust with different trustees. |
|
(3) |
|
William H. Brady III is special trustee of this trust and has sole voting and dispositive
powers with respect to these shares. William H. Brady III is the grandson of William H. Brady. |
89
(b)
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership of each class of equity
securities of the Company by each Director or Nominee and by all Directors and Officers of the
Company as a group as of July 31, 2011. Unless otherwise noted, the address for each of the listed
persons is c/o Brady Corporation, 6555 West Good Hope Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223. Except as
otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Title of Class |
|
Name of Beneficial Owner & Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
Ownership(4) |
|
|
Ownership |
|
Class A Common Stock |
|
Elizabeth P. Pungello(1) |
|
|
1,352,095 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert(2) |
|
|
925,161 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
Peter C. Sephton |
|
|
305,402 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
|
298,808 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
Matthew O. Williamson |
|
|
285,973 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
Robert L. Tatterson |
|
|
129,833 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad G. Goodkind |
|
|
91,510 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
Frank W. Harris |
|
|
72,245 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Patrick W. Allender |
|
|
39,736 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Chan W. Galbato |
|
|
32,694 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Bradley C. Richardson |
|
|
25,083 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Gary S. Balkema |
|
|
11,468 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
All Officers and Directors as a Group (17 persons)(3) |
|
|
4,105,264 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
Elizabeth P. Pungello(1) |
|
|
1,769,304 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates less than one-tenth of one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Pungellos holdings of Class A Common Stock include 1,352,095 shares owned by a trust for
which she is a trustee and has sole dispositive and voting authority. Ms. Pungellos holdings
of Class B Common Stock include 1,769,304 shares owned by a trust over which she has sole
dispositive and voting authority. |
|
(2) |
|
Of the amount reported, Mr. Jaehnerts spouse owns 5,446 shares of Class A Common Stock
directly. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount shown for all officers and directors individually and as a group (17 persons)
includes options to acquire a total of 2,443,174 shares of Class A Common Stock, which are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of July 31, 2011, including the
following: Ms. Pungello, 42,400 shares; Mr. Jaehnert, 805,336 shares; Mr. Sephton, 264,002
shares; Mr. Felmer, 271,336 shares; Mr. Williamson, 271,502 shares; Mr. Tatterson, 125,001
shares; Mr. Goodkind, 28,400 shares; Mr. Harris, 42,400 shares; Mr. Allender, 28,400 shares;
Mr. Galbato, 28,400 shares; Mr. Richardson, 22,400 shares;
Mr. Balkema, 9,468 shares; Mr.
Klotsche, 275,402 shares; Mr. Curran, 101,890 shares; Ms. Johnson, 58,001 shares; Mr. Millar,
39,501 shares; and Mr. Pearce, 29,335 shares. It does not include other options for Class A
Common Stock which have been granted at later dates and are not exercisable within 60 days of
July 31, 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
The amount shown for all officers and directors individually and as a group (17 persons)
includes Class A Common Stock owned in deferred compensation plans totaling 163,759 shares of
Class A Common Stock, including the following: Ms. Pungello, 2,163 shares; Mr. Jaehnert,
88,343 shares; Mr. Sephton, 0 shares; Mr. Felmer, 10,618 shares; Mr. Williamson, 14,471
shares; Mr. Tatterson, 0 shares; Mr. Goodkind, 13,059 shares; Mr. Harris, 0 shares; Mr.
Allender, 11,336 shares; Mr. Galbato, 4,293 shares; Mr. Richardson, 2,683 shares; Mr. Balkema,
0 shares; Mr. Klotsche, 7,823 shares; Mr. Curran, 104 shares; Ms. Johnson, 5,832 shares; Mr.
Millar, 0 shares; and Mr. Pearce, 3,034 shares. |
(c)
Changes in Control
No arrangements are known to the Company, which may, at a subsequent date, result in a change
in control of the Company.
90
(d) Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
to be issued upon |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
equity compensation |
|
|
|
exercise of |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
plans (excluding |
|
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
securities reflected in |
|
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
column (a)) |
|
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
5,799,017 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
|
|
737,000 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,799,017 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
|
|
737,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys equity compensation plans allow the granting of stock options to various
officers, directors and other employees of the Company at prices equal to fair market value at the
date of grant. The Company has reserved 3,000,000 and 200,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock for issuance under the Brady Corporation 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan and the Brady
Corporation 2010 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors, respectively.
Generally, options will not be exercisable until one year after the date of grant, and will be
exercisable thereafter, to the extent of one-third per year and have a maximum term of ten years.
In August 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, and 2011 certain executives and key management
employees were issued stock options that vest upon meeting certain financial performance conditions
in addition to the vesting schedule described above. Performance-based options expire 10 years from
the date of grant. All grants under the equity plans are at market price on the date of the grant.
The Company granted 210,000 performance-based restricted shares during fiscal 2008, with a grant
price and fair value of $32.83. Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the fiscal 2008 performance-based restricted
shares to provide for an additional two year vesting period. See Exhibit 10.35, incorporated by
reference, for the full text of the amendment. The Company did not grant any performance-based
restricted shares during fiscal 2010 or 2009. The Company granted 100,000 shares of
performance-based restricted stock to Frank M. Jaehnert, the Companys President and Chief
Executive Officer, in August of 2010, with a grant price and fair value of $28.35. As of July 31,
2011, 310,000 performance-based restricted shares were outstanding.
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The Company annually solicits information from its Directors in order to ensure there are no
conflicts of interest. The information gathered annually is reviewed by the Company and if any
transactions are not in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or are potentially
in violation of the Companys Corporate Governance Principles, the transactions are referred to the
Corporate Governance Committee for approval, ratification, or other action. Further, potential
affiliated party transactions are discussed at the Companys quarterly disclosure committee
meetings. In addition pursuant to its charter, the Companys Audit Committee periodically reviews
reports and disclosures of insider and affiliated party transactions with the Company, if any.
Furthermore, the Companys directors are expected to be mindful of their fiduciary obligations to
the Company and to report any potential conflicts to the Corporate Governance Committee for review.
Based on the Companys consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, the Corporate
Governance Committee will decide whether or not to approve such transactions and will approve only
those transactions that are in the best interest of the Company. Additionally, the Company has
processes in place to educate executives and employees about affiliated transactions. The Company
maintains an anonymous hotline by which employees may report potential conflicts of interest such
as affiliated party transactions. Based on these evaluations the Company has determined that it
does not have material related party transactions that affect the results of operations, cash flow
or financial condition. The Company has also determined that no transactions occurred in fiscal
2011, or are currently proposed, that would require disclosure under Item 404 (a) of Regulation
S-K.
See Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant for a discussion of director
independence.
91
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
The following table presents the aggregate fees incurred for professional services by Deloitte
& Touche LLP and Deloitte Tax LLP during the years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010. Other than as set
forth below, no professional services were rendered or fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP or
Deloitte Tax LLP during the years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Audit, audit-related and tax compliance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees(1) |
|
$ |
1,374 |
|
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
Tax fees compliance |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal audit, audit-related and tax compliance fees |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Non-audit related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees planning and advice |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
Other fees (2) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-audit related fees |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees |
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
2,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of the Companys annual
financial statements, attestation of managements assessment of internal control, reviews of
the quarterly financial statements and statutory reporting compliance. |
|
(2) |
|
All other fees relate to expatriate activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Ratio of Tax Planning and Advice Fees and All
Other Fees to Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax
Compliance Fees |
|
|
.3 to 1 |
|
|
|
.5 to 1 |
|
Pre-Approval Policy The services performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm (Independent Auditors) in fiscal 2010 and 2011 were pre-approved in accordance with the
pre-approval policy and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee at its November 19, 2003 meeting.
The policy requires the Audit Committee to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed
by the Independent Auditors in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair
the auditors independence. Unless a type of service to be performed by the Independent Auditors
has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the
Audit Committee.
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
Item 15 (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1) & 2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted as they are not required, or the required information is
shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3) Exhibits See Exhibit Index at page 93 of this Form 10-K.
92
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Brady Corporation (1) |
|
3.2 |
|
|
By-laws of Brady Corporation, as amended (23) |
|
*10.1 |
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement, amended as of December 23, 2008, entered into with Thomas J.
Felmer, Allan J. Klotsche, Peter C. Sephton, Robert L. Tatterson, and Matthew O. Williamson (12) |
|
*10.2 |
|
|
Brady Corporation BradyGold Plan, as amended (2) |
|
*10.3 |
|
|
Executive Additional Compensation Plan, as amended (2) |
|
*10.4 |
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (16) |
|
*10.5 |
|
|
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (25) |
|
*10.6 |
|
|
Forms of Non-Qualified Employee Stock Option Agreement, Director Stock Option Agreement, and Employee
Performance Stock Option Agreement under 2006 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (10) |
|
*10.7 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (10) |
|
*10.8 |
|
|
Form of Brady Corporation 2004 Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Stock Plan, as amended (13) |
|
10.9 |
|
|
Brady Corporation Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan (4) |
|
*10.10 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2005 Nonqualified Plan for Non-employee Directors, as amended (3) |
|
*10.11 |
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreements under 2005 Non-qualified Plan for Non-employee Directors,
as amended (8) |
|
*10.12 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 1997 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (10) |
|
*10.13 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (10) |
|
10.14 |
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Credit Agreement (14) |
|
*10.15 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (10) |
|
*10.16 |
|
|
Brady Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Elected Corporate Officers, as amended (15) |
|
10.17 |
|
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility Credit Agreement (6) |
|
*10.18 |
|
|
Form of Amendment, dated March 4, 2009, to granting agreement for performance-based stock options issued
on August 2, 2004 to Frank M. Jaehnert, Thomas J. Felmer, Peter C. Sephton, Matthew O. Williamson, and
Allan J. Klotsche (12) |
|
*10.19 |
|
|
Form of Performance-based Restricted Stock Agreement under Brady Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive
Stock Plan (7) |
|
*10.20 |
|
|
Change of Control Agreement, amended as of December 23, 2008, entered into with Frank M. Jaehnert (12) |
|
*10.21 |
|
|
Restated Brady Corporation Restoration Plan (5) |
|
*10.22 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2001 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (10) |
|
*10.23 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2003 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (10) |
|
10.24 |
|
|
Brady Note Purchase Agreement dated June 28, 2004 (11) |
|
10.25 |
|
|
First Supplement to Note Purchase Agreement, dated February 14, 2006 (9) |
|
10.26 |
|
|
Second Supplement to Note Purchase Agreement, dated March 23, 2007 (24) |
|
*10.27 |
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement, amended as of December 23, 2008, entered into with Kathleen Johnson
(12) |
|
*10.28 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (22) |
|
*10.29 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2010 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (17) |
|
*10.30 |
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Employee Stock Option Agreement and Employee Performance Stock Option Agreement
under 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (17) |
|
*10.31 |
|
|
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee
Directors (17) |
|
*10.32 |
|
|
Form of Amendment, dated February 17, 2010, to granting agreement for performance-based stock options
issued on August 1, 2005 to Frank M. Jaehnert, Thomas J. Felmer, Peter C. Sephton, Matthew O. Williamson
and Allan J. Klotche (18) |
|
10.33 |
|
|
Brady Note Purchase Agreement dated May 13, 2010 (19) |
|
*10.34 |
|
|
Performance-based Restricted Stock Agreement with Frank M. Jaehnert, dated August 2, 2010 (20) |
|
*10.35 |
|
|
Form of Amendment to January 8, 2008 Brady Corporation Performance-Based Restricted Stock Agreement,
dated July 20, 2011 (21) |
|
*10.36 |
|
|
Brady Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Senior Executives (15) |
|
*10.37 |
|
|
Form of Fiscal 2012 Performance Stock Option under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan |
|
*10.38 |
|
|
Brady Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan |
|
*10.39 |
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Employee Stock Option Agreement under 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan |
|
*10.40 |
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Employee Performance Stock Option Agreement under 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan |
|
*10.41 |
|
|
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under 2012 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan |
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of Brady Corporation |
93
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
23 |
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Thomas J. Felmer |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Frank M. Jaehnert |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Thomas J. Felmer |
|
101 |
|
|
Interactive Data File |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Registration Statement No. 333-04155 on Form S-3 |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal
year ended July 31, 1989 |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 25, 2008 |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 1992 |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended January 31, 2008 |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2008 |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 9, 2008 |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 4, 2006 |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 17, 2006 |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2008 |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants 8-K/A filed August 3, 2004 |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended January 31, 2009 |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2005 |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2006 |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2011 |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended April 30, 2011 |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2009 |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2010 |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 14, 2010 |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 4, 2010 |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed July 28, 2011 |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 27,
2010 |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 23, 2010 |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 26, 2007 |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 15,
2011 |
94
SCHEDULE
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
BRADY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, |
|
Description |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Valuation accounts deducted in balance sheet
from assets to which they apply Accounts
receivable allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,137 |
|
|
$ |
7,931 |
|
|
$ |
10,059 |
|
Additions Charged to expense |
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
Due to acquired businesses |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions Bad debts written off, net of recoveries |
|
|
(2,293 |
) |
|
|
(2,879 |
) |
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period |
|
$ |
6,183 |
|
|
$ |
7,137 |
|
|
$ |
7,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserve for slow-moving inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at beginning of period |
|
$ |
15,944 |
|
|
$ |
22,288 |
|
|
$ |
22,148 |
|
Additions Charged to expense |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
5,138 |
|
Due to acquired businesses |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions Inventory write-offs |
|
|
(7,317 |
) |
|
|
(8,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period |
|
$ |
13,009 |
|
|
$ |
15,944 |
|
|
$ |
22,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized this 27th day of September 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Corporation
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Thomas j. felmer
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Felmer |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capabilities and on the dates
indicated.*
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
/s/ FRANK M. JAEHNERT
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ KATHLEEN M. JOHNSON
Kathleen M. Johnson
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ BRADLEY C. RICHARDSON
Bradley C. Richardson
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ PATRICK W. ALLENDER
Patrick W. Allender
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ CHAN W. GALBATO
Chan W. Galbato
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ FRANK W. HARRIS
Frank W. Harris
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ CONRAD G. GOODKIND
Conrad G. Goodkind
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ ELIZABETH P. PUNGELLO
Elizabeth P. Pungello
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ GARY S. BALKEMA
Gary S. Balkema
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
* |
|
Each of the above signatures is affixed as of September 27, 2011. |
96