Transcat 10-Q
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 23, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, of the registrant outstanding as
of October 20, 2006 was 6,920,899.
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
2
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
9,880 |
|
|
$ |
9,412 |
|
|
$ |
20,417 |
|
|
$ |
18,797 |
|
Service Sales |
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
9,963 |
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
14,860 |
|
|
|
14,119 |
|
|
|
30,380 |
|
|
|
28,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold |
|
|
7,415 |
|
|
|
7,087 |
|
|
|
15,244 |
|
|
|
14,213 |
|
Cost of Services Sold |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold |
|
|
11,312 |
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
22,972 |
|
|
|
20,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Other Expense |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
|
7,269 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
|
March |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
25, 2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $79
and $63 as of September 23, 2006 and March 25, 2006, respectively |
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
7,989 |
|
Other Receivables |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
Finished Goods Inventory, net |
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Charges |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
13,503 |
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
Assets Under Capital Leases, net |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Charges |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
20,865 |
|
|
$ |
21,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
3,811 |
|
|
$ |
4,219 |
|
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions and Other |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Current Portion of Term Loan |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
10,826 |
|
Term Loan, less current portion |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Deferred Compensation |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
12,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,174,689 and 7,048,028 shares issued as of September 23, 2006 and
March 25, 2006, respectively; 6,908,341 and 6,791,240 shares
outstanding as of September 23, 2006 and March 25, 2006, respectively |
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Unearned Compensation |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 266,348 and 256,788 shares as of
September 23, 2006 and March 25, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
20,865 |
|
|
$ |
21,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts Receivable |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Provision for Returns |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Provision for Slow Moving or Obsolete Inventory |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Common Stock Expense |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
456 |
|
Prepaid Expenses, Deferred Charges and Other |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions and Other |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Deferred Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
Payments on Term Loans |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(424 |
) |
Payments on Capital Leases |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period |
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in Cashless Exercise of Stock Options |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-Cash Issuance of Common Stock |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
In |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value |
|
|
Of Par |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as
of March 25, 2006 |
|
|
7,048 |
|
|
$ |
3,524 |
|
|
$ |
4,641 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
$ |
(888 |
) |
|
$ |
8,647 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
Stock Option Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as
of September 23, 2006 |
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
$ |
5,091 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
$ |
(938 |
) |
|
$ |
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc. (Transcat or Company) is a leading distributor of
professional grade test, measurement, and calibration instruments and a provider of calibration and
repair services, primarily throughout the process, life science and manufacturing industries.
Basis of Presentation: Transcats unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the
Consolidated Financial Statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) have been included. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year. The accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial
Statements as of and for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2006 (fiscal year 2006) contained in the
Companys 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
NOTE 2
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share of Common Stock are computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of Common Stock
reflect the assumed conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and non-vested restricted stock
awards. In computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which would have been
received from the exercise of options and warrants are considered to have been used to purchase
shares of Common Stock at the average market prices during the period, and the resulting net
additional shares of Common Stock are included in the calculation of average shares of Common Stock
outstanding.
For the second quarter and the first six months of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007 (fiscal
year 2007), the net additional Common Stock equivalents had a $.01 per share effect and no effect,
respectively, on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. For the second quarter and the
first six months of the fiscal year 2006, the net additional Common Stock equivalents had no effect
and a $.01 per share effect, respectively, on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. The
total number of dilutive and anti-dilutive Common Stock equivalents resulting from stock options,
warrants and non-vested restricted stock are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Anti-dilutive |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
$ |
0.80$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.80$4.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.80$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.80$4.26 |
|
Warrants |
|
$ |
0.97$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.97$4.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.97$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.97$4.26 |
|
7
NOTE 3
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In June 2003, the Company adopted the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (2003 Plan), which was
approved by the Companys shareholders in August 2003 and amended by the Companys shareholders in
August 2006 to permit directors to participate in the plan. The 2003 Plan replaced the Transcat,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (1993 Plan). The 918 shares that were
outstanding as of the termination of the 1993 Plan were reserved under the 2003 Plan. The 2003
Plan provides for grants of options to directors, officers and key employees to purchase Common
Stock at no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Options generally vest over a
period of up to four years and expire up to ten years from the date of grant. As of September 23,
2006, the Company had 764 stock options available for grant. There were 54 stock options granted
during the six months ended September 23, 2006. Compensation expense of $0.2 million related to
stock options for the six months ended September 23, 2006 has been recognized as a component of
Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective March 26, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which requires the Company to measure the cost
of employee services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options,
based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS 123R supersedes SFAS No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). The Company has adopted SFAS 123R using the
modified prospective application method which requires the Company to record compensation cost
related to unvested stock awards as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing the unamortized grant date
fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of those awards with no change in
historical reported earnings. Awards granted after March 25, 2006 will be valued at fair value in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a straight line basis over the
service periods of each award. Results for prior periods have not been restated. SFAS 123R also
requires excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options to be presented in the consolidated
statements of cash flows as a financing activity rather than an operating activity, as presented
prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions
for exercised options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation
costs for such options. The Company did not have any stock-based compensation costs capitalized as
part of an asset. The Company estimated forfeiture rates for the first six months of fiscal year
2007 based on its historical experience.
Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with
APB 25 using the intrinsic value method, which did not require that compensation cost be recognized
for the Companys stock options provided the option exercise price was equal to or greater than the
common stock fair market value on the date of grant. Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Company
provided pro forma disclosure amounts in accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), as if the fair value method defined in
SFAS 123 had been applied to its stock-based compensation. The Companys net income and net income
per share for the six months ended September 24, 2005 would have been reduced if compensation cost
related to stock options had been recorded in the financial statements based on fair value at the
grant dates.
The estimated fair value of the options granted during fiscal year 2007 and prior years was
calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model (Black-Scholes). The following
summarizes the assumptions used in the fiscal year 2007 Black-Scholes model:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life |
|
6 years |
|
Annualized volatility rate |
|
|
80% |
|
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
4.75% |
|
Dividend rate |
|
|
0.0% |
|
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate
of return for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on a zero-coupon U.S.
government instrument over the contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is
based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected term of all options granted is
estimated by taking the average of the weighted average vesting term and the contractual term, as
illustrated in the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. This methodology is not materially different
from the Companys historical data on exercise timing. Separate groups of employees that have
similar historical exercise behavior with regard to option exercise timing and forfeiture rates are
considered separately for valuation and attribution purposes.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, Net Income for the quarter and the six months ended September
23, 2006 included $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for stock-based compensation. The
impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter and the six months ended
September 23, 2006 was $.01 and $.03, respectively, per share. Pro forma net income as if the fair
value based method had been applied to all stock option awards is as follows:
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Net Income, as reported |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards,
net of related tax effects |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
|
7,269 |
|
As of September 23, 2006, the Company had $0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2 years.
Option activity as of September 23, 2006 and changes during the six months then ended were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 25, 2006 |
|
|
452 |
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (Deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of September 23, 2006 |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of September 23, 2006 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the second
quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock
options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their
options on September 23, 2006. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the
fair market value of the Companys stock.
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended September 23,
2006 and September 24, 2005 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Cash receipts from
the exercise of options were less than $0.1 million during the six months ended September 23, 2006
and $0.2 million during the six months ended September 24, 2005. The Company recognized an
immaterial tax benefit in the six months ended September 23, 2006 related to the exercise of
employee stock options.
Compensation expense related to shares issued to the Companys employees through the Employees
Stock Purchase Plan was $5 for the six months ended September 23, 2006.
9
NOTE 4
DEBT
Description. On November 13, 2002, Transcat entered into a Revolving Credit and Loan Agreement
(Credit Agreement) with GMAC Business Credit, LLC (GMAC). The Credit Agreement consisted of a
term loan, a revolving line of credit (LOC), and certain material terms which are as set forth
below.
The Credit Agreement was amended on April 11, 2003 to address certain non-material post closing
conditions.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on July 22, 2004 to waive compliance with an EBITDA
(earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) covenant for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2005, permanently waive a requirement relating to an inactive subsidiary
that the Company had committed to dissolve by a specific date (that has been subsequently
dissolved), and increase the Credit Agreement restriction on Master Catalog spending.
Transcat amended the Credit Agreement again on November 1, 2004 (Third Amendment). The Third
Amendment consisted of two term notes, a LOC, a capital expenditure loan option if certain
conditions are met, and certain material terms which are as set forth below. The Third Amendment
also waived compliance with the Companys EBITDA covenant for the second quarter of fiscal year
2005 and extended the Credit Agreement expiration from November 13, 2005 to October 31, 2007.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on March 16, 2006 (Fourth Amendment). The Fourth
Amendment provided GMACs consent to the acquisition of N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. (NWCI),
reduced the interest rates by 0.375% in all tiers and loans, extended the Credit Agreement
expiration from October 31, 2007 to October 31, 2008 and provided for a termination premium of
0.25% payable by Transcat, if applicable, for the additional year, increased the capital
expenditure covenant for fiscal year 2006 from $1.5 million to $2.0 million, and permitted Transcat
to include NWCI receivables in the borrowing base, upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
Term Loans. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company has two term loans,
Term Loan A and Term Loan B, in the amounts of $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The
notes representing the term loans require annual payments of $0.5 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, payable over three years in equal monthly installments, commencing on December 1,
2004. The Company is further required to reduce the term loans on an annual basis by a percentage
of excess cash flow, as defined in the Credit Agreement, as amended. Term Loan B will be reduced
by the lesser of the balance owed on Term Loan B or 50% of the Companys excess cash flow payable
in three monthly installments. Once Term Loan B has been repaid, the excess cash flow payment
required against Term Loan A is 20% of the Companys excess cash flow, not to exceed $0.2 million,
annually. As of September 23, 2006, the Credit Agreement, as amended, requires the Company to make
the following principal payments on the combined term loans, before giving effect to any excess
cash flow payments that may be made:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Payments Before Giving |
|
|
|
Effect to Excess Cash Flow Payments |
|
|
|
Term Loan A |
|
|
Term Loan B |
|
|
Total |
|
Fiscal Year 2007 (1) |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
Fiscal Year 2008 |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Current portion on the Consolidated Balance Sheet includes six months of fiscal year
2007 and six months of fiscal year 2008. |
LOC. Under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the maximum amount available under the LOC
portion is $9.0 million. As of September 23, 2006, the Company was eligible to borrow up to $7.4
million based on certain of the Companys assets and had borrowed $3.5 million. Availability under
the LOC is determined by a formula based on eligible accounts receivable (85%) and inventory (50%).
The Credit Agreement, as amended, contains both a subjective acceleration clause and a requirement
to maintain a lock-box arrangement. These conditions result in a short-term classification of the
LOC in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-22, Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding
under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box
Arrangement.
10
Interest. Interest on the term loans and LOC is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the
Companys calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, as amended
(see chart below). The prime rate and the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as of
September 23, 2006 were 8.3% and 5.3%, respectively. The Companys interest rate for the first six
months of fiscal year 2007 ranged from 6.8% to 8.4% and was at tier 2, as described in the
following chart:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier |
|
Coverage Ratio |
|
Term Loan A |
|
Term Loan B |
|
LOC |
1
|
|
1.249 or less
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.375%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.875%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.25 to 1.49
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.625%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.125% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
1.50 or greater
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
Prime Rate minus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 1.875% |
Covenants. The Credit Agreement, as amended, has certain covenants with which the Company has
to comply, including a minimum EBITDA covenant, and restrictions on capital expenditures and Master
Catalog spending. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements
throughout the first six months of fiscal year 2007.
Loan Costs. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-14, Debtors Accounting for Changes in
Line-of-Credit or Revolving-Debt Arrangements, any fees paid to GMAC, third party costs associated
with the LOC, and unamortized costs remaining under the Credit Agreement, as amended, are amortized
over the term of the Credit Agreement.
Other Terms. The Credit Agreement, as amended, requires a termination premium should an event of
default occur. A termination premium of 1% of the advance limit in year one, 0.5% in year two, and
0.25% in year three, as defined in the Credit Agreement, will be incurred if the Credit Agreement
is terminated prior to its expiration date of October 31, 2008.
Additionally, the Company has pledged certain property and fixtures in favor of GMAC, including
inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable as collateral security for the loans made under the
Credit Agreement, as amended.
11
NOTE 5
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment
information for the second quarter and six months ended September 23, 2006 and September 24, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
9,880 |
|
|
$ |
9,412 |
|
|
$ |
20,417 |
|
|
$ |
18,797 |
|
Service |
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
9,963 |
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14,860 |
|
|
|
14,119 |
|
|
|
30,380 |
|
|
|
28,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
5,173 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
3,699 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Service |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense (including interest) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6
COMMITMENTS
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In fiscal year 2002, the Company entered into a distribution
agreement (Distribution Agreement) with Fluke Electronics Corporation (Fluke) to be the
exclusive worldwide distributor of Transmation and Altek products until December 31, 2006. Under
the Distribution Agreement, the Company also agreed to purchase a pre-determined amount of
inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of September 1, 2002, the Company entered into a new
distribution agreement (New Agreement) with Fluke, which replaced the Distribution Agreement.
The New Agreement ends on December 31, 2006. Under the
terms of the New Agreement, among other items, the Company agreed to purchase a larger,
pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader array of products and brands during each
calendar year. The Companys purchases for calendar years 2005, 2004, and 2003 exceeded the
commitment under the New Agreement. The Company believes that this commitment to make future
purchases is consistent with Transcats business needs and plans.
NOTE 7 VENDOR CONCENTRATION
Approximately 30% of Transcats product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke, which is
believed to be consistent with Flukes share of the markets the Company serves.
12
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements. This report and, in particular, the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These include statements concerning expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (Transcat, we, us, or our). Words
such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results
may materially differ from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
Rounding. Certain percentages may vary depending on the basis used for the calculation, such as
dollars in thousands and dollars in millions.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when products are shipped or services are rendered to
customers, as we generally have no significant post delivery obligations, our prices are fixed and
determinable, collection of the resulting receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably
estimated. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related sales are
recorded based upon historical data. We recognize the majority of our service revenue based upon
when the calibration or repair activity is performed then shipped and/or delivered to the customer.
Some of our service revenue is generated from managing customers calibration programs in which we
recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. Our shipments are generally free on board
shipping point and our customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and handling
charges.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent receivables from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and
returns in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts
receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the specific formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have
failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns
reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to sales over a specific
timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of
sales and/or the historical rate of returns.
Stock Options: Effective March 26, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which requires us to measure the cost of
employee services received in exchange for all equity awards granted including stock options based
on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS 123R supersedes SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). We have adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective
application method which requires us to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards
as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the
remaining service periods of those awards with no change in historical reported earnings. Awards
granted after March 25, 2006 are valued at fair value in accordance with the provisions of SFAS
123R and recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award. Results for
prior periods have not been restated. SFAS 123R also requires excess tax benefits from the
exercise of stock options to be presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows as a
financing activity rather than an operating activity, as presented prior to the adoption of SFAS
123R. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised options in
excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such options.
We did not have any stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of an asset. We estimated
forfeiture rates for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 based on our historical experience.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
13
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal years 2007
and 2006, the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations (calculated on dollars in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
As a Percentage of Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
66.5 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
Service Sales |
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
Service Gross Profit |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Total Gross Profit |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Other Expense |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
SECOND QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 23, 2006 COMPARED TO SECOND QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 24, 2005 (dollars in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
Service |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $0.8 million or 5.7% (calculated on dollars in millions) from the second
quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
Our distribution products net sales results, which accounted for 66.5% of our sales in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2007 and 66.7% of our sales in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006
(calculated on dollars in thousands), reflect improved year-over-year customer response to our
sales and marketing activities and increased sales in our indirect channel of distribution. Our
fiscal years 2007 and 2006 product sales in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is
as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Growth |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, our direct channel grew at 3.7% (calculated on
dollars in thousands) year-over-year. This is a result of strong growth in international sales,
despite relatively flat US and Canadian year-over-year sales growth. In addition, we experienced
continued double-digit growth in our indirect channel, primarily from high-volume electrical and
instrumentation wholesalers, which caused a shift in our mix by distribution channel. Government
sales decreased as a result of less aggressive quoting on government orders, which resulted in
higher profit percentages for government sales. The following table provides the percentage of net
sales and the approximate gross profit percentage for significant product distribution channels for
the second quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 (calculated on dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 Second Quarter |
|
|
FY 2006 Second Quarter |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
Direct |
|
|
83.9 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
Government |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Indirect |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
15
Customer product orders include orders for products that we routinely stock in our inventory,
customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested
to be calibrated in our calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, and orders required to be shipped at a future date. Our total unshippable product orders
for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 were $0.6 million higher than the second quarter of
fiscal year 2006. This is mainly a result of two significant product orders that were received at
the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, but will be shipped in future quarters as we
await the receipt of the goods from our suppliers. These orders were also the key driver of the
increase in the percentage of unshippable product orders that are backorders. The following table
reflects the percentage of total unshippable product orders that are backorders at the end of each
fiscal quarter and our historical trend of total unshippable product orders (calculated on dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Total Unshippable Orders |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Unshippable Orders that
Are Backorders |
|
|
90.5 |
% |
|
|
78.6 |
% |
|
|
|
92.9 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
72.1 |
% |
|
|
78.7 |
% |
Calibration services net sales increased $0.3 million, or 6.4% (calculated on dollars in
millions), from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
This increase is attributable almost entirely to our acquisition of NWCI during the fourth quarter
of fiscal year 2006. In addition, within any quarter, while we may add new customers, we may also
have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat during the same quarter for
any number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the timing of customer periodic
calibrations on equipment and repair services, customer capital expenditures and customer
outsourcing decisions. Our fiscal year 2007 second quarter calibration services sales in relation
to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Sales Growth |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
Service |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit decreased as a percent of net sales from 25.6% in the second quarter of fiscal
year 2006 to 23.9% in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 (calculated on dollars in thousands).
Product gross profit increased $0.2 million, or 8.7% (calculated on dollars in millions) from the
second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, primarily
attributable to the 5.3% (calculated on dollars in millions) increase in product net sales. As a
percentage of product net sales, product gross profit increased 0.8 points (calculated on dollars
in millions) from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
This was primarily attributable to a reduction in our discount rates extended to customers within
our direct channel. Partially offsetting this increase was $0.1 million less in rebates achieved
in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The
product net sales growth in our indirect distribution channel, which typically supports lower
margins, also partially offset the improvement in the product gross profit percentage.
16
Our product gross profit can be impacted by a number of factors that influence quarterly
comparisons. Among those factors are sales to certain channels that do not support the margins of
our core customer base, periodic rebates on purchases discussed above, and cooperative advertising
received from suppliers reported as a reduction of cost of sales in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain
Consideration Received from a Vendor. The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend
of our product gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Gross Profit % (1) |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
Other Income (Expense) % (2) |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit % |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers,
Freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit decreased $0.2 million or 5.7 points (calculated on dollars
in millions) from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
This decrease is primarily due to increases in our operating costs along with relatively flat
revenue (exclusive of incremental NWCI sales). The following table reflects the quarterly
historical trend of our calibration services gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Gross Profit % |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased $0.1 million, or 3.2% (calculated on dollars in millions), from
the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2007. Operating
expenses as a percent of total net sales decreased from 21.9% in the second quarter fiscal year
2006 to 20.4% in the second quarter fiscal year 2007 (calculated on dollars in thousands).
Selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses decreased $0.1 million due to a concerted effort to
control spending, while achieving the above mentioned 5.7% overall sales growth. Administrative
expenses were flat from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal year
2007. Increased stock option expense per SFAS 123R, which we adopted in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2007, was offset by reductions in other employee-related expenses.
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Other Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Interest expense was consistent from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second
quarter of fiscal year 2007 as reduced debt balances were offset by higher interest rates. Other
expense decreased $0.1 million from the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 to the second quarter of
fiscal year 2007, primarily attributable to a decrease in net losses in Canadian currency
transactions.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, we recognized a $0.1 million provision for income
taxes. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, we did not recognize any provision for income
taxes as pretax income was offset by a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
When calculating income tax expense, we recognize valuation allowances for deferred tax assets,
which may not be realized, using a more likely than not approach.
18
SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 23, 2006 COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 24, 2005 (dollars in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
Service |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $2.2 million or 7.8% (calculated on dollars in millions) from the first
six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007.
Our distribution products net sales results, which accounted for 67.2% of our sales in the first
six months of fiscal year 2007 and 66.7% of our sales in the first six months of fiscal year 2006
(calculated on dollars in thousands), reflect improved year-over-year customer response to our
sales and marketing activities.
Sales growth in both our direct and indirect channels has accounted for the $1.6 million, or 8.5%
(calculated on dollars in millions) increase in distribution products net sales for the first six
months of fiscal year 2007 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Sales within our
government channel have continued to decrease as a result of less aggressive quoting of low margin
government orders. Our fiscal years 2007 and 2006 product sales in relation to prior fiscal year
first six months comparisons, is as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 23, 2006 |
|
|
September 24, 2005 |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
Direct |
|
|
82.5 |
% |
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
85.0 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
Government |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Indirect |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Calibration services net sales increased $0.6 million, or 6.4% (calculated on dollars in
millions), from the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year
2007. This increase is attributable almost entirely to our acquisition of NWCI during the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2006. In addition, within any six month period, while we may add new
customers, we may also have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat during
the same period for any number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the timing of
customer periodic calibrations on equipment and repair services, customer capital expenditures and
customer outsourcing decisions.
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
Service |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit decreased as a percent of net sales from 25.6% in the first six months of fiscal
year 2006 to 24.4% in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 (calculated on dollars in
thousands).
19
Product gross profit increased $0.6 million, or 13.0% (calculated on dollars in millions) from the
first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007, primarily because
of the above mentioned 8.5% (calculated on dollars in millions) increase in product net sales. As
a percent of product net sales, product gross profit increased 0.9 points (calculated on dollars in
thousands) from the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year
2007, primarily attributable to a $0.2 million increase in rebates achieved in the first six months
of fiscal year 2007. Improvement to our product gross profit percent as a result of a reduction
in our discount rates extended to our customers within our direct channel was offset by sales
growth in our indirect distribution channel, which typically supports lower margin percentages.
Calibration services gross profit decreased $0.4 million or 5.6 points (calculated on dollars in
thousands) from the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year
2007. This decrease is primarily due to increases in our operating costs along with relatively flat
revenue (exclusive of incremental NWCI sales).
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.2 million, or 3.2% (calculated on dollars in millions), from
the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007. This was
primarily attributable to the expensing of stock options per SFAS 123R, which we adopted in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2007. Despite this increase, operating expenses as a percent of total
net sales decreased from 22.6% in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to 21.6% in the first
six months of fiscal year 2007 (calculated on dollars in thousands). Selling, marketing, and
warehouse expenses remained relatively flat due to our continued efforts to control spending, while
achieving the above mentioned 7.8% overall sales growth. Administrative expenses, including $0.2
million of stock option expense, increased $0.2 million from the first six months of fiscal year
2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007.
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Other Expense |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense was consistent from the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six
months of fiscal year 2007. Other expense also remained relatively flat from the first six months
of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
|
24, 2005 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
In the first six months of fiscal year 2007 we recognized a $0.2 million provision for income
taxes. In the first six months of fiscal year 2006, we did not recognize any provision for income
taxes as pretax income was offset by a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
When calculating income tax expense, we recognize valuation allowances for deferred tax assets,
which may not be realized, using a more likely than not approach.
20
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
Cash (Used in) Provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
1,992 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
Operating Activities:
Cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was $0.5
million, a decrease of nearly $1.5 million (calculated on millions of dollars) when compared to the
$2.0 million of cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of fiscal year 2006.
This is mainly attributable to a $0.1 million (calculated on millions of dollars) decrease in net
income, approximately $1.0 million less cash provided via receivables reductions, and approximately
a $0.6 million increase in cash used to reduce accrued payrolls and commissions in the first six
months of fiscal year 2007 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Significant
working capital fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
Inventory/Accounts Payable: Our inventory of $4.0 million on September 23, 2006 is
flat with fiscal year 2006 year-end inventory on March 25, 2006 and $1.4 million less
than the inventory level on September 24, 2005. The year-over-year decrease is due to
refined inventory ordering models and increased focus on maintaining lower inventory
levels. Our $0.3 million decrease in accounts payable, as the following table
illustrates (dollars in millions), is primarily the result of the timing of outstanding
checks clearing and reduced inventory purchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
Accounts Payable/Inventory Ratio |
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables: The increase in our accounts receivable at the end of our second
quarter of fiscal year 2007 compared to the end of the second quarter of fiscal year
2006 is primarily due to sales growth in our fiscal year 2007 second quarter. We have
continued to maintain strong collections on our accounts receivable, reflected in our
days sales outstanding, as the following table illustrates (dollars in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding (based on 60 days) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Investing Activities: The $0.5 million of cash used in investing activities during the first
six months of fiscal year 2007, which was $0.1 million (calculated on millions of dollars) more
than the first six months of fiscal year 2006, was primarily for capital expenditures within our
calibration laboratories.
Financing Activities: The $1.3 million decrease in our overall debt, as shown in the table below,
is the result of the $2.9 million of cash provided by operating activities during the last six
months of fiscal year 2006 and the first six months of fiscal year 2007. See Note 4 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
23, 2006 |
|
24, 2005 |
Term Debt |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Debt. Our Revolving Credit and Loan Agreement, as amended, (Credit Agreement)
with GMAC Business Credit, LLC consists of two term notes, a revolving line of credit, a capital
expenditure loan option, and certain material terms which are disclosed in Note 4 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The table below indicates our excess EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation
and amortization) percentage for the periods indicated. We met our EBITDA covenant for all of
fiscal year 2006, as well as the first two quarters of fiscal year 2007, and we expect to meet the
covenant on an on-going basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Excess EBITDA |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
See Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our debt. See
Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of this report for a discussion
of interest rates on our debt.
Unconditional Purchase Obligation. In fiscal year 2002, we entered into a distribution agreement
(Distribution Agreement) with Fluke Electronics Corporation (Fluke) to be the exclusive
worldwide distributor of Transmation and Altek products until December 31, 2006. Under the
Distribution Agreement, we also agreed to purchase a pre-determined amount of inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of September 1, 2002, we entered into a new
distribution agreement (New Agreement) with Fluke, which replaced the Distribution Agreement.
Under the terms of the New Agreement, among other items, we agreed to purchase a larger,
pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader array of products and brands during each
calendar year. Our purchases for calendar years 2005, 2004, and 2003 exceeded the commitment under
the New Agreement. We believe that this commitment to make future purchases is consistent with our
business needs and plans. Once the New Agreement ends on December 31, 2006, we expect to enter
into another distribution agreement (Future Agreement) with Fluke. We are in discussions with
Fluke regarding the Future Agreement. Although discussions with Fluke have not yet been completed,
as part of the Future Agreement, Fluke has agreed that we will remain the exclusive worldwide
distributor of Transmation and Altek products, subject to certain minimum product purchase
requirements.
Because we expect that our purchases for calendar year 2006 will meet our commitment, we also
expect that the $1.5 million gain on the sale of TPG to Fluke, which has been deferred since fiscal
year 2002, will be recognized in our fiscal year 2007 third quarter ending on December 23, 2006.
22
OUTLOOK
Revenue increased in both Distribution Products and Calibration Services sales in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2007. On a year-to-date basis, our Distribution Products sales are up 8.6%
over the prior year, consistent with our expectations. The Transcat 2007 Master Catalog was
distributed in September 2006 and we have a number of additional marketing initiatives underway to
support our Distribution Products business.
For the first half of the fiscal year 2007, 97% of our Calibration Services sales growth and 48% of
our growth in cost of services sold were attributable to the acquisition of NWCI which we acquired
in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. Excluding NWCI, growth in our Calibration Services
business continues to fall short of our expectations. Increases in our operating costs along with
relatively flat revenue have had a negative impact on our Calibration Services gross profit margin.
During the second quarter, we continued to make changes in our sales and marketing organizations
and selling processes to improve our growth rate in this segment.
For the remainder of fiscal year 2007, we will build on the solid foundation that has been
established over the previous four years, with continued growth in revenues. We expect the
business overall will experience growth in fiscal year 2007 similar to that of fiscal year 2006.
We are focused on maximizing gross margin from our Distribution Products sales while maintaining
sales growth in the high single digits in fiscal year 2007. A core strategy for Distribution
Products growth is to identify customers who also have a high potential demand for Calibration
Services. However, we will also take advantage of other market opportunities when they arise. One
such example is the increased Distribution Products sales through indirect channels we achieved in
the first half of fiscal year 2007, which had lower margins, and which we anticipate should decline
as a percentage of our total sales going forward as we replace sales through indirect channels with
higher margin sales through direct channels, with consequent improvements in gross margin.
We are also focused on growth in our Calibration Services business in fiscal year 2007 to leverage
the investments we have made and improve our gross margin. We continue to make changes in our
sales and marketing organizations and selling processes to improve our growth rate in this segment
and believe that cross-selling our Distribution Products and Calibration Services provides
significant value to our customers and gives us both competitive advantages and operating
efficiencies.
23
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing activities. In the event interest
rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than $0.1
million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained constant. On September 23, 2006 and
September 24, 2005, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward
movements in interest rates.
Under the fourth amendment to our Credit Agreement described in Note 4 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements, interest on the term loans and revolving line of credit is adjusted on a
quarterly basis based upon our calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined in the third
amendment (see chart below). The prime rate and the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
as of September 23, 2006 were 8.3% and 5.3%, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier |
|
Coverage Ratio |
|
Term Loan A |
|
Term Loan B |
|
LOC |
1
|
|
1.249 or less
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.375%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.875%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.25 to 1.49
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.625%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.125% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
1.50 or greater
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
Prime Rate minus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 1.875% |
Our interest rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 ranged from 6.8% to 8.4% and
was at Tier 2.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Approximately 90% and 91% of our sales were denominated in United States dollars with the remainder
denominated in Canadian dollars for the six months ended September 23, 2006 and September 24, 2005,
respectively. A 10% change in the value of the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would
impact our revenues by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship between the United States and
Canadian currencies on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices for products and services sold in
Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate. On September 23, 2006 and September 24, 2005, we
had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(our principal executive officer) and our Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(our principal financial officer) evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report. Based on this evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Vice President
of Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by
this quarterly report (our second fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On August 15, 2006, our shareholders voted on the following proposals at the annual meeting:
Proposal 1:
To elect Francis R. Bradley, Cornelius J. Murphy, Alan H. Resnick and Carl Sassano as directors of
the Company, each to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Francis R. Bradley |
|
|
6,496,211 |
|
|
|
48,162 |
|
Cornelius J. Murphy |
|
|
6,249,647 |
|
|
|
294,726 |
|
Alan H. Resnick |
|
|
6,496,111 |
|
|
|
48,262 |
|
Carl E. Sassano |
|
|
6,491,772 |
|
|
|
52,601 |
|
The other directors, whose terms of office continued after the meeting, are E. Lee Garelick,
Richard J. Harrison, Nancy D. Hessler, Robert G. Klimasewski, Paul Moore, Harvey J. Palmer and John
T. Smith.
Proposal 2:
To approve an amendment to the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan to permit directors to
participate in the plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
3,910,612 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
467,581 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
66,914 |
|
Broker Non-Votes: |
|
|
2,099,266 |
|
Proposal 3:
To approve and ratify the selection of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Companys independent auditors for
the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
6,521,275 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
6,572 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
16,626 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On August 15, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the formal termination of the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan (Directors Stock Plan). The
Directors Stock Plan, which was approved by shareholders in 1995, provided for automatic,
non-discretionary awards of shares of common stock to non-employee directors in lieu of an annual
cash retainer and cash fees paid to directors for attendance at meetings.
The material terms of the Directors Stock Plan were most recently summarized in the Companys
definitive proxy statement for the 2001 annual meeting of shareholders (in connection with a
proposed amendment to the plan), and the plan, together with amendments, has been previously filed
as exhibits to the Companys periodic reports.
As previously reported in the Companys definitive proxy statements for the 2004 and 2006 annual
meeting of shareholders, in October 2003, the non-employee directors of the Company voluntarily
agreed to cease receiving equity awards under the Directors Stock Plan and instead agreed to
receive their annual retainers and meeting attendance fees in cash.
At the annual meeting held on August 15, 2006, shareholders approved the amendment to the Transcat,
Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan to permit directors to participate in that plan. Accordingly, the Board
of Directors formally terminated the Directors Stock Plan, effective August 15, 2006.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index to Exhibits.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSCAT, INC. |
|
|
|
Date: November
7, 2006 |
|
/s/ Carl E. Sassano |
|
|
|
|
|
Carl E. Sassano |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: November
7, 2006 |
|
/s/ John J. Zimmer |
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Zimmer |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
26
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
10.1 |
|
Summary of the Transcat, Inc.
Post-Retirement Benefits and Long-Term Care
Insurance Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K dated July 25, 2006. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as
amended, is incorporated herein by
reference from Appendix D to the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July
10, 2006 in connection with the 2006 annual
meeting of shareholders. |
(31) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
(32) |
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
27