UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008
Commission File Number: 1-12997
MAXIMUS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia |
|
54-1000588 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11419 Sunset Hills Road |
|
|
Reston, Virginia |
|
20190 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(703) 251-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of January 30, 2009, there were 17,401,357 shares of the registrants common stock (no par value) outstanding.
MAXIMUS, Inc.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2008
Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms we, us, our and MAXIMUS refer to MAXIMUS, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
2
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIMUS, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
119,605 |
|
$ |
61,461 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
2,736 |
|
2,543 |
|
||
Accounts receivable billed, net of reserves of $5,512 and $4,828 |
|
128,819 |
|
101,876 |
|
||
Accounts receivable unbilled |
|
30,695 |
|
28,180 |
|
||
Current portion of note receivable |
|
746 |
|
759 |
|
||
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
9,469 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
21,901 |
|
17,574 |
|
||
Due from insurance carrier |
|
12,500 |
|
12,986 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
7,892 |
|
11,370 |
|
||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
193 |
|
192 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
325,087 |
|
246,410 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
81,232 |
|
81,498 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(47,238 |
) |
(48,106 |
) |
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
33,994 |
|
33,392 |
|
||
Capitalized software |
|
19,979 |
|
20,521 |
|
||
Less accumulated amortization |
|
(5,854 |
) |
(6,159 |
) |
||
Capitalized software, net |
|
14,125 |
|
14,362 |
|
||
Deferred contract costs, net |
|
5,324 |
|
6,384 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
60,659 |
|
58,976 |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
3,699 |
|
2,832 |
|
||
Note receivable, less current portion |
|
1,337 |
|
1,036 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
10,933 |
|
3,217 |
|
||
Other assets, net |
|
3,788 |
|
3,459 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
458,946 |
|
$ |
370,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
48,950 |
|
$ |
36,799 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
26,684 |
|
22,681 |
|
||
Current portion of deferred revenue |
|
19,676 |
|
21,441 |
|
||
Current portion of income taxes payable |
|
12,662 |
|
|
|
||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
417 |
|
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
53,891 |
|
19,068 |
|
||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
11,028 |
|
5,134 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
173,308 |
|
105,123 |
|
||
Deferred revenue, less current portion |
|
8,315 |
|
6,861 |
|
||
Income taxes payable, less current portion |
|
1,617 |
|
1,668 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
183,240 |
|
113,652 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 18,302,368 and 17,586,834 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, at stated amount, respectively |
|
328,323 |
|
330,834 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost; 8,635,130 and 9,375,620 shares at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
(289,103 |
) |
(312,338 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
5,536 |
|
(1,139 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
230,950 |
|
239,059 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
275,706 |
|
256,416 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
458,946 |
|
$ |
370,068 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MAXIMUS, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
177,089 |
|
$ |
180,092 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
130,805 |
|
132,945 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
46,284 |
|
47,147 |
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
27,038 |
|
27,338 |
|
||
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
19,246 |
|
19,809 |
|
||
Interest and other income, net |
|
1,501 |
|
94 |
|
||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
20,747 |
|
19,903 |
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
8,479 |
|
7,862 |
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
12,268 |
|
12,041 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(1,663 |
) |
(73 |
) |
||
Loss on disposal |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(1,663 |
) |
(78 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per share (Note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(0.08 |
) |
(0.01 |
) |
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (Note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
20,506 |
|
17,802 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
20,854 |
|
17,956 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MAXIMUS, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
1,663 |
|
78 |
|
||
Depreciation |
|
2,681 |
|
2,009 |
|
||
Amortization |
|
719 |
|
737 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,195 |
|
12,043 |
|
||
Deferred interest income on note receivable |
|
|
|
107 |
|
||
Non-cash equity based compensation |
|
3,386 |
|
1,866 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable billed |
|
10,822 |
|
25,930 |
|
||
Accounts receivable unbilled |
|
(8,078 |
) |
1,901 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
1,362 |
|
(3,819 |
) |
||
Deferred contract costs |
|
404 |
|
(1,236 |
) |
||
Other assets |
|
104 |
|
(899 |
) |
||
Accounts payable |
|
(1,608 |
) |
(11,071 |
) |
||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
(2,879 |
) |
(3,701 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue |
|
(1,628 |
) |
1,698 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
(3,141 |
) |
(21,959 |
) |
||
Other liabilities |
|
(530 |
) |
(36,852 |
) |
||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities continuing operations |
|
18,077 |
|
(21,205 |
) |
||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities discontinued operations |
|
2,712 |
|
(5,972 |
) |
||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
20,789 |
|
(27,177 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Decrease in note receivable |
|
|
|
182 |
|
||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(2,381 |
) |
(2,425 |
) |
||
Capitalized software costs |
|
(920 |
) |
(1,717 |
) |
||
(Increase) decrease in marketable securities |
|
126,160 |
|
|
|
||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities continuing operations |
|
122,859 |
|
(3,960 |
) |
||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities discontinued operations |
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
122,077 |
|
(3,960 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee stock transactions |
|
1,655 |
|
593 |
|
||
Repurchases of common stock |
|
(150,388 |
) |
(22,431 |
) |
||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
(401 |
) |
(417 |
) |
||
Tax benefit due to option exercises and restricted stock units vesting |
|
297 |
|
53 |
|
||
Cash dividends paid |
|
(2,222 |
) |
(1,765 |
) |
||
Cash used in financing activities continuing operations |
|
(151,059 |
) |
(23,967 |
) |
||
Cash used in financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash used in financing activities |
|
(151,059 |
) |
(23,967 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(8,193 |
) |
(58,144 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
70,472 |
|
119,605 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
62,279 |
|
$ |
61,461 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
MAXIMUS, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
In these Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms the Company, MAXIMUS, we, or our refer to MAXIMUS, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
General
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. The balance sheet at September 30, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, including certain reclassifications to conform to the December 31, 2008 presentation, but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In addition to the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and as of September 30, 2008, include a majority (55%) owned international subsidiary.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and the notes thereto at September 30, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2008, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-12997) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2008.
Income Taxes
Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 provides that the financial statement effects of an income tax position can only be recognized when, based on the technical merits, it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 was required to be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The Companys net unrecognized tax benefits totaled $2.0 million at September 30, 2008 and $2.1 million at December 31, 2008 (including related interest amounts) after offsetting deferred tax assets, competent authority benefits, deductions, and/or credits on the Companys tax returns. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the annual effective income tax rate is $2.1 million at December 31, 2008. The Company estimates it may recognize $0.4 million of tax benefits in the next 12 months due to the expiration of statute of limitations.
We record interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of our income tax provision. We recorded less than $0.1 million of interest and penalties in our current income tax provision for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The net FIN 48 liability balance at December 31, 2008 of $2.1 million includes approximately $0.3 million of interest and penalties.
6
The Company files income tax returns in the United States Federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to US Federal income tax examinations for years before 2005 and is no longer subject to state and local, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2004.
Legal and Settlement Expense
Legal and settlement expense consists of costs, net of reimbursed insurance claims, related to significant legal settlements and non-routine legal matters, including future probable legal costs estimated to be incurred in connection with those matters. Legal expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys Board of Directors established stock plans during 1997 pursuant to which the Company may grant non-qualified stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company. Such plans also provide for stock awards and direct purchases of the Companys common stock. At December 31, 2008, the Board of Directors had reserved 8.1 million shares of common stock for issuance under the Companys stock plans. At December 31, 2008, approximately 1.6 million shares remained available for grants under the Companys stock plans.
Stock options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock at the date of grant. Stock options generally vest ratably over a period of four years and, beginning in fiscal 2005, expire six years after date of grant. Options issued prior to fiscal 2005 expire ten years after date of grant. For the three months ended December 31, 2008, compensation expense recognized related to stock options was $0.4 million. Compensation expense recognized related to stock options was $1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007, which includes $0.5 million to correct for an understatement of compensation expense related to estimated forfeiture rates being applied to fully vested stock options in fiscal 2006 and 2007.
The Company also issues Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) to certain executive officers and employees under its 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (Plan). Generally, these RSUs vest ratably over six years with full vesting upon the sixth anniversary of the date of grant, provided, however, that the vesting will accelerate if the Company meets certain earnings targets determined by the Board of Directors. The fair value of the RSUs, based on the Companys stock price at the grant date, is expensed over the vesting period. Compensation expense recognized related to RSUs was $1.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Compensation expense recognized related to RSUs was $2.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007, which includes $1.7 million to correct for an understatement of compensation expense related to estimated forfeiture rates being applied to fully vested RSUs in fiscal 2006 and 2007.
2. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income, plus changes in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of comprehensive income for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(127 |
) |
(6,675 |
) |
||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
10,478 |
|
$ |
5,288 |
|
3. Deferred Contract Costs
Deferred contract costs consist of contractually recoverable direct set-up costs relating to long-term service contracts in progress. These costs include direct and incremental costs incurred prior to the commencement of the Company providing contracted services to our customers. These costs totaled $30.9 million and $33.0 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively, of which $7.6 million consisted of leased equipment. Deferred contract costs are expensed ratably as services are provided under the contracts. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, accumulated amortization of deferred contract costs was $25.6 million and $26.6 million, of which $7.2 million and $7.6 million is the accumulated amortization of capital lease assets included in deferred costs, respectively.
7
4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The changes in goodwill for the three months ended December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Consulting |
|
Operations |
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
19,846 |
|
$ |
40,813 |
|
$ |
60,659 |
|
Goodwill activity related to acquisition |
|
|
|
724 |
|
724 |
|
|||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
(2,407 |
) |
(2,407 |
) |
|||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
19,846 |
|
$ |
39,130 |
|
$ |
58,976 |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Westcountry Training and Consultancy Service (WTCS) Limited, a privately-owned employment and training company in the United Kingdom that specializes in helping people who are disadvantaged in the labor market gain employment. Per the terms of the share purchase agreement, additional consideration of approximately £0.5 million (approximately $0.7 million U.S.) was accrued in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 based on the achievement of certain performance objectives. WTCS is part of the Companys Operations Segment.
The following table sets forth the components of intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Intangible |
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Intangible |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Non-competition agreements |
|
$ |
1,882 |
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
1,903 |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Technology-based intangibles |
|
3,370 |
|
2,909 |
|
461 |
|
3,370 |
|
3,141 |
|
229 |
|
||||||
Customer contracts and relationships |
|
7,077 |
|
3,877 |
|
3,200 |
|
6,065 |
|
3,465 |
|
2,600 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
12,329 |
|
$ |
8,630 |
|
$ |
3,699 |
|
$ |
11,338 |
|
$ |
8,506 |
|
$ |
2,832 |
|
Intangible assets from acquisitions are amortized over a period of five to ten years. The weighted-average amortization periods for non-competition agreements, technology-based intangibles, and customer contracts and relationships are approximately five years, five years, and ten years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period for total intangible assets is approximately six years. Intangible amortization expense was $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The estimated amortization expense for the years ending September 30, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 is $1.1 million, $0.7 million, $0.5 million, none and none, respectively.
5. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including contract and employment claims, in the ordinary course of its business. The matters reported on below involve significant pending or potential claims against us.
(a) In January 2007, MAXIMUS initiated arbitration against Accenture LLP to resolve various disputes that had arisen under a subcontract between the parties in support of Accentures prime contract with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) for the Integrated Eligibility and Enrollment Services program (the Program). Among other things, the Company asserted that Accenture had breached the subcontract resulting in damages to MAXIMUS in excess of $100 million. Accenture denied MAXIMUS claims and asserted a counterclaim that MAXIMUS breached the subcontract. Accenture alleged unspecified damages which it stated could be hundreds of millions of dollars. The subcontract incorporated the terms and conditions of the prime contract which contained a limitation of liability of $250.0 million.
In February 2007, MAXIMUS terminated its subcontract with Accenture. In March 2007, HHSC announced that it was winding down its contract with Accenture. HHSC alleged a variety of damages arising from the parties operation of the Program. Accenture indicated that its damages claim against MAXIMUS in the arbitration proceeding would include damages asserted by HHSC against Accenture.
Shortly after the wind down of the Accenture contract with HHSC, MAXIMUS entered into agreements directly with HHSC to provide enrollment broker, CHIP operations and eligibility support services. The contracts for CHIP operations and eligibility support services run through December 31, 2009, and the enrollment broker contract runs through August 31, 2010.
8
In December 2008, MAXIMUS, Accenture and HHSC settled all claims among the parties, both the claims in the arbitration proceeding and the contract wind down claims. In connection with that settlement, MAXIMUS agreed to pay a total of $40.0 million and to provide services to HHSC valued at an additional $10.0 million. The Companys primary insurance carrier has agreed to pay $12.5 million of the amount due from MAXIMUS, which is included in due from insurance carrier in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $37.5 million in legal and settlement expense in the consolidated statements of operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company continues to pursue additional insurance recoveries from its excess insurance carriers; however, such recoveries are not assured.
(b) In November 2007, MAXIMUS was sued by the State of Connecticut in the Superior Court in the Judicial District of Hartford. MAXIMUS had entered into a contract in 2003 with the Connecticut Department of Information Technology to update the States criminal justice information system. The State claims that MAXIMUS breached its contract and also alleges negligence and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. MAXIMUS has sued its primary subcontractor on the effort (ATS Corporation) which abandoned the project before completing its obligations. Although the State did not specify damages in its complaint, it demanded payment of alleged damages of approximately $6.2 million in a letter sent to the Company in September 2007. The Company denies that it has breached its contract with the State. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the legal proceedings or any settlement negotiations or the impact they may have on the Companys operating results or financial condition.
Credit Facilities and Performance Bonds
In June 2003, in connection with a long-term contract, the Company issued a standby letter of credit in an initial amount of up to $20.0 million, which amount was reduced to $10.0 million on April 1, 2005. The letter of credit, which expires on March 31, 2009, may be called by the customer in the event the Company defaults under the terms of the contract. The Company also has two letters of credit in connection with insurance policies, which total approximately $0.4 million. The letters of credit for insurance policies expire in May 2009 and automatically renew annually, thereafter.
On January 25, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement providing for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with SunTrust Bank as administrative agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and a syndicate of other lenders (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility provides for a $50.0 million revolving line of credit commitment, which may be used (i) for revolving loans, (ii) for swingline loans, subject to a sublimit of $5.0 million, and (iii) to request the issuance of letters of credit on the Companys behalf, subject to a sublimit of $25.0 million. The Company may request an increase in the commitment under the Credit Facility, such that the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility shall at no time exceed $75.0 million. On June 30, 2008, SunTrust Banks commitment automatically stepped down from $50.0 million to $35.0 million in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility. The credit available under the Credit Facility may be used, among other purposes, to refinance the Companys current indebtedness, to repurchase shares of the Companys capital stock and to finance the ongoing working capital, capital expenditure, and general corporate needs of the Company. At December 31, 2008, letters of credit totaling $10.4 million are outstanding under the Credit Facility.
Subject to applicable conditions, the Company may elect interest rates on its revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the prime lending rate as announced by SunTrust Bank (or, if higher, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or the one-month adjusted LIBO rate) (a Base Rate Borrowing), or (ii) the reserve adjusted rate per annum equal to the offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a one (1), two (2), three (3) or six (6) month period in the London Inter-Bank Market (a LIBOR Borrowing), and, in each case, plus an applicable margin that is determined by reference to the Companys then-current leverage ratio. For swingline borrowings, the Company will pay interest at the rate of interest for a one (1) month LIBOR Borrowing, plus the applicable margin, or at a rate to be separately agreed upon by the Company and the administrative agent.
The Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2013, at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid and all outstanding letters of credit must have been terminated or cash collateralized.
The Credit Facility, as amended by the Company and its lender on December 12, 2008, provides for the payment of specified fees and expenses, including an up-front fee and commitment and letter of credit fees, and contains customary financial and other covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all covenants in the amended Credit Facility as of December 31, 2008. The Companys obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Companys direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Guarantors) and are secured by substantially all of MAXIMUS and the Guarantors present and future tangible and intangible assets, including the capital stock of subsidiaries and other investment property.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, the Company had performance bond commitments totaling $83.4 million and $82.9 million, respectively.
9
Lease Obligations
On July 15, 2003, the Company entered into a capital lease financing arrangement with a financial institution, whereby the Company acquired assets pursuant to an equipment lease agreement. Rental payments for assets leased are payable over a 60-month period at an interest rate of 4.05% commencing in January 2004. On March 29, 2004, the Company entered into a supplemental capital lease financing arrangement with the same financial institution whereby the Company acquired additional assets pursuant to an equipment lease agreement. Rental payments for assets leased under the supplemental arrangement are payable over a 57-month period at an interest rate of 3.61% commencing in April 2004. Capital lease obligations of $0.4 million were outstanding related to these lease arrangements for new equipment at September 30, 2008. No capital lease obligations were outstanding at December 31, 2008.
6. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the components of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
12,268 |
|
$ |
12,041 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(1,663 |
) |
(78 |
) |
||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
20,506 |
|
17,802 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee stock options and unvested restricted stock units |
|
348 |
|
154 |
|
||
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
20,854 |
|
17,956 |
|
7. Stock Repurchase Programs
On November 14, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of the Companys outstanding common stock under an Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR) program. In connection with the ASR program, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with UBS Investment Bank during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Under the ASR agreement, the Company acquired and retired 3,758,457 shares at an initial price of $39.91 per share for $150.0 million plus fees of approximately $0.4 million. UBS purchased an equivalent number of shares in the open market over the nine-month period ending August 15, 2008. Pursuant to the ASR agreement, at its completion the Companys initial price under the ASR agreement was adjusted down based on the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of the Companys stock during this period. Such adjustment could be settled in cash or stock at the Companys discretion. On July 11, 2008, UBS Investment Bank completed the purchase of shares in the open market, and the Company elected to receive the price adjustment of $13.9 million in cash. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, this receipt of cash was recorded as a decrease to common stock in the full amount of $13.9 million.
Under a resolution adopted in July 2008, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at managements discretion, of up to an aggregate of $75.0 million of the Companys common stock. The resolution also authorized the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Companys common stock. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased 740,490 common shares at a cost of $23.2 million. At December 31, 2008, $59.5 million remained available for future stock repurchases under the resolution. As of February 4, 2009, the Company had repurchased 187,200 common shares at a cost of $6.8 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
10
8. Segment Information
The following table provides certain financial information for each of the Companys business segments (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% (1) |
|
2008 |
|
% (1) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operations |
|
$ |
146,807 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
156,338 |
|
100 |
% |
Consulting |
|
30,282 |
|
100 |
% |
23,754 |
|
100 |
% |
||
Total |
|
177,089 |
|
100 |
% |
180,092 |
|
100 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operations |
|
35,557 |
|
24.2 |
% |
41,469 |
|
26.5 |
% |
||
Consulting |
|
10,727 |
|
35.4 |
% |
5,678 |
|
23.9 |
% |
||
Total |
|
46,284 |
|
26.1 |
% |
47,147 |
|
26.2 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general, and administrative expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operations |
|
17,731 |
|
12.1 |
% |
20,123 |
|
12.9 |
% |
||
Consulting |
|
8,948 |
|
29.5 |
% |
7,140 |
|
30.1 |
% |
||
Corporate/Other |
|
359 |
|
NM |
(2) |
75 |
|
NM |
(2) |
||
Total |
|
27,038 |
|
15.3 |
% |
27,338 |
|
15.2 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operations |
|
17,826 |
|
12.1 |
% |
21,346 |
|
13.7 |
% |
||
Consulting |
|
1,779 |
|
5.9 |
% |
(1,462 |
) |
(6.2 |
)% |
||
Consolidating adjustments |
|
(359 |
) |
NM |
(2) |
(75 |
) |
NM |
(2) |
||
Total |
|
$ |
19,246 |
|
10.9 |
% |
$ |
19,809 |
|
11.0 |
% |
|
(1) |
% of respective segment revenue |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Not meaningful |
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised) (SFAS 141(R)), Business Combinations, which is effective for business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which is the Companys 2010 fiscal year. Early adoption of the standard is prohibited. Under SFAS 141(R), more transactions will be recorded as business combinations, as it changes the definitions of a business, which would no longer be required to be self-sustaining or revenue generating, and a business combination, which would include combinations that occur by contract alone or due to changes in substantive participation rights, such as a lapse in minority veto rights. Certain acquired contingencies will be recorded initially at fair value on the acquisition date. After the acquisition, if new information is available, contingent liabilities will be measured at the higher of the likely amount to be paid and the acquisition-date fair value. Contingent assets will be measured subsequently at the lower of the current estimated future amount to be realized and the acquisition-date fair value. Transaction and restructuring costs generally will be expensed as incurred. In partial acquisitions, companies generally will record 100 percent of the assets and liabilities at fair value, including goodwill. This will likely result in higher related depreciation and amortization charges in subsequent periods than under the current standard. SFAS 141(R) will only impact us if we acquire businesses subsequent to the effective date of the standard.
Concurrent with the issuance of SFAS 141(R), the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which is the Companys 2010 fiscal year. Early adoption of the standard is prohibited. This statement will be applied prospectively as of October 1, 2009 except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The standard changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests and requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity. It also requires that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income. We are in the process of reviewing and evaluating SFAS No. 160, and therefore the ultimate impact of its adoption is not yet known.
11
10. Discontinued Operations
On April 30, 2008, the Company sold its Security Solutions division for cash proceeds of $4.6 million, net of transaction costs of $0.4 million, and recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of $2.9 million. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of this business are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. The Security Solutions division was previously reported as part of the Companys Systems Segment.
On May 2, 2008, the Company sold its Unison MAXIMUS, Inc. subsidiary for proceeds of $6.5 million. The sale transaction was structured as a sale of stock to the then current management team of the subsidiary. The sale price of $6.5 million consisted of $0.1 million in cash and $6.4 million in the form of a promissory note secured by (1) a security interest in all of the assets of the former subsidiary; (2) a pledge of shares by the buyer; and (3) a personal guaranty by members of the current management team who are shareholders of the buyer. In accordance with Topic 5-U of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 81, Gain Recognition on the Sale of a Business or Operating Assets to a Highly Leveraged Entity, the Company has deferred recognition of a pre-tax gain on the sale of $3.9 million, and interest income on the promissory note, until realization is more fully assured. The deferred gain of $3.9 million is reflected as a deduction from the note receivable on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of this business are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. Unison MAXIMUS, Inc. was previously reported as part of the Companys Consulting Segment.
On September 30, 2008, the Company sold its Justice Solutions, Education Systems, and Asset Solutions divisions, which were previously reported as part of its Systems Segment. Total consideration for the transaction was $40.0 million, including a $35.0 million cash payment received at closing and a $5.0 million holdback for one year from closing, subject to a purchase price adjustment and any claims based on representations and warranties. The Company deferred recognition of the holdback and, net of transaction costs of $2.0 million, recognized a pre-tax loss on the sale of $12.2 million. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company classified the results of operations of these divisions as discontinued operations and incorporated the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Solutions division into the Consulting Segment. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of these businesses are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,861 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
(2,732 |
) |
$ |
(121 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
(1,069 |
) |
(48 |
) |
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss on disposal before income taxes |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
||
Loss on disposal |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
$ |
(78 |
) |
12
The following table summarizes the carrying values of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable billed |
|
$ |
192 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
1 |
|
|
|
||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
193 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
725 |
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
11. Fair Value Measurements
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, establishes a market-based framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We have deferred the adoption of SFAS No. 157 with respect to non-financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the provisions of FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2 (FSP FAS 157-2), Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157. Items in this classification include goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FSP FAS 157-2 will have on our results of operations and financial condition.
SFAS No. 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: |
Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: |
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
Level 3: |
Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions. |
Active markets are those in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Inactive markets are those in which there are few transactions for the asset, prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little information is released publicly. With regard to the Companys financial assets subject to fair value measurements, the Company believes that all of the assets it holds are actively traded because there is sufficient frequency and volume to obtain information on an ongoing basis.
The Companys financial assets subject to fair value measurements and the necessary disclosures are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2008 Using Fair |
|
||||||||
Description |
|
2008 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
61,461 |
|
$ |
61,461 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Companys Level 1 assets include cash, money market instruments and U.S. Treasury securities. The Companys cash balances are valued based on quoted prices from third parties and the U.S. Treasury securities are valued based on broker quotes.
The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition since the resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption were not different than the fair values that would have been calculated under previous accounting guidance.
On October 1, 2008, the Company also adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. We did not elect the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 for any of our financial assets or liabilities upon adoption. There was no impact to our results of operations or financial condition as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 159.
12. Subsequent Events
Stock Repurchases
As of February 4, 2009, the Company had repurchased 187,200 common shares at a cost of $6.8 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included both herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2008.
Forward Looking Statements
From time to time, we may make forward-looking statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our confidence and strategies and our expectations about revenue, results of operations, profitability, current and future contracts, market opportunities, market demand or acceptance of our products and services. Any statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. The words could, estimate, future, intend, may, opportunity, potential, project, will, believes, anticipates, plans, expect and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These risks are detailed in Exhibit 99.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
Business Overview
We are a leading provider of consulting services and operations program management focused in the areas of health and human services primarily to government. Since our inception, we have been at the forefront of innovation in meeting our mission of Helping Government Serve the People®. We use our expertise, experience and advanced information technology to make government operations more efficient while improving the quality of services provided to program beneficiaries. We operate primarily in the United States, and we have had contracts with government agencies in all 50 states, Canada, Australia, Israel and the United Kingdom. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we had revenue of $745.1 million and net income of $6.7 million. For the three months ended December 31, 2008, we had revenue of $180.1 million and net income of $12.0 million.
14
Results of Operations
Consolidated
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected statements of operations data:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
177,089 |
|
$ |
180,092 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
46,284 |
|
$ |
47,147 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
27,038 |
|
$ |
27,338 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue |
|
15.3 |
% |
15.2 |
% |
||
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
19,246 |
|
$ |
19,809 |
|
Operating margin from continuing operations percentage |
|
10.9 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
12,268 |
|
$ |
12,041 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
$ |
(78 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(0.08 |
) |
(0.01 |
) |
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Revenue increased 1.7%, or 5.2% on a constant currency basis, for the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in fiscal 2008. We present constant currency revenue information to provide a framework for assessing how our business performed excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. To present this information, current quarter revenue from foreign operations is converted into United States dollars using first quarter fiscal 2008 average exchange rates. All our foreign operations are in the Operations Segment. Strong revenue growth in our domestic health services division and federal operations offset the adverse impact of a strong United States dollar on foreign sourced revenue.
Operating income from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was $19.8 million, compared to operating income of $19.2 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. A $3.3 million decrease in operating income in the Consulting Segment was offset by a $3.5 million increase in operating income in the Operations Segment.
Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) consists of costs related to general management, marketing and administration. These costs include salaries, benefits, bid and proposal efforts, travel, recruiting, continuing education, employee training, non-chargeable labor costs, facilities costs, printing, reproduction, communications, equipment depreciation, intangible amortization, and legal expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business. SG&A as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was 15.2 %, compared to 15.3% for the same period in fiscal 2008.
Provision for income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was 39.5% of income from continuing operations before income taxes, compared to 40.9% for the same period in fiscal 2008.
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes was $12.0 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared with $12.3 million, or $0.59 per diluted share, for the same period in fiscal 2008 and primarily reflects the effect of our ongoing share repurchase program.
15
Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was $12.0 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, compared with $10.6 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, for the same period in fiscal 2008. The increase in net income of $1.4 million is primarily attributable to a smaller loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of $1.6 million.
Operations Segment
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
146,807 |
|
$ |
156,338 |
|
Gross profit |
|
35,557 |
|
41,469 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
17,826 |
|
21,346 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating margin percentage |
|
12.1 |
% |
13.7 |
% |
||
The Operations Segment includes health services, workforce services, child support, and federal managed services and operations work.
Revenue increased 6.5%, or 10.7% on a constant currency basis, for the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in fiscal 2008. Operating income for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was $21.3 million, compared to operating income of $17.8 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The increase in operating income of $3.5 million is driven by strong revenue growth and margin improvement in health services and federal operations.
Consulting Segment
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
30,282 |
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
Gross profit |
|
10,727 |
|
5,678 |
|
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
1,779 |
|
(1,462 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating margin (loss) percentage |
|
5.9 |
% |
(6.2 |
)% |
||
The Consulting Segment includes program performance services, program and systems integrity services, educational services, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions.
Revenue was $23.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $30.3 million in the same period in fiscal 2008. Operating loss for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was $1.5 million, compared to operating income of $1.8 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decreases in revenue of $6.5 million and operating income of $3.3 million are primarily attributable to (1) a $2.5 million provision related to a fixed price ERP contract and (2) the exit from federal healthcare claiming work.
Interest and Other Income, Net
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Percentage of revenue |
|
0.8 |
% |
0.1 |
% |
||
Interest and other income for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was $0.1 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in interest and other income of $1.4 million is primarily attributable to a $1.1 million reduction in interest income related to the $150.0 million Accelerated Share Repurchase that was completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, which reduced cash balances. The weakening of the Canadian and Australian dollars accounted for the remaining $0.3 million reduction in interest and other income, which arose from intercompany transactions involving foreign exchange.
16
Discontinued Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,861 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
(2,732 |
) |
$ |
(121 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
(1,069 |
) |
(48 |
) |
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss on disposal before income taxes |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
||
Loss on disposal |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,663 |
) |
$ |
(78 |
) |
On April 30, 2008, the Company sold its Security Solutions division for cash proceeds of $4.6 million, net of transaction costs of $0.4 million, and recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of $2.9 million. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of this business are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. The Security Solutions division was previously reported as part of the Companys Systems Segment.
On May 2, 2008, the Company sold its Unison MAXIMUS, Inc. subsidiary for proceeds of $6.5 million. The sale transaction was structured as a sale of stock to the then current management team of the subsidiary. The sale price of $6.5 million consisted of $0.1 million in cash and $6.4 million in the form of a promissory note secured by (1) a security interest in all of the assets of the former subsidiary; (2) a pledge of shares by the buyer; and (3) a personal guaranty by members of the current management team who are shareholders of the buyer. In accordance with Topic 5-U of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 81, Gain Recognition on the Sale of a Business or Operating Assets to a Highly Leveraged Entity, the Company has deferred recognition of a pre-tax gain on the sale of $3.9 million, and interest income on the promissory note, until realization is more fully assured. The deferred gain of $3.9 million is reflected as a deduction from the note receivable on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of this business are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. Unison MAXIMUS, Inc. was previously reported as part of the Companys Consulting Segment.
On September 30, 2008, the Company sold its Justice Solutions, Education Systems, and Asset Solutions divisions, which were previously reported as part of its Systems Segment. Total consideration for the transaction was $40.0 million, including a $35.0 million cash payment received at closing and a $5.0 million holdback for one year from closing, subject to a purchase price adjustment and any claims based on representations and warranties. The Company deferred recognition of the holdback and, net of transaction costs of $2.0 million, recognized a pre-tax loss on the sale of $12.2 million. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company classified the results of operations of these divisions as discontinued operations and incorporated the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Solutions division into the Consulting Segment. The financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of these businesses are reported as discontinued operations and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
17
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Current Economic Environment
With the United States in a very significant recession, the current economic environment facing state and local governments is quite challenging. Not only are they experiencing declining tax revenues, but they are also facing increasing demand for critical services from the most vulnerable members of society. At the same time, states are generally required to balance their budgets each year. Certain states may delay payments to vendors as a result of budgetary constraints. In prior periods, the Company has faced short-term payment delays from state customers, all of which were ultimately recovered. The Company believes its liquidity and capital positions are adequate to weather short-term payment delays. In the event of more protracted delays, the Company may be required to seek additional capital sources, amend payment terms or take other actions. Extended payment delays could adversely affect the Companys cash flows, operations and profitability.
The Obama administration is advancing economic stimulus legislation to address some of the pressures facing state and local governments. The Company believes that demand for its services in its core areas of health, education and human services will remain strong and that the passage of such an economic stimulus package could increase demand for such services. However, any increases in demand resulting from the adoption of an economic stimulus package will depend largely upon the timing, amount and nature of the Federal legislation targeted at the states as well as the timing and nature of the states actions in response to such funding.
Cash Flows
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities continuing operations |
|
$ |
18,077 |
|
$ |
(21,205 |
) |
Operating activities discontinued operations |
|
2,712 |
|
(5,972 |
) |
||
Investing activities continuing operations |
|
122,859 |
|
(3,960 |
) |
||
Investing activities discontinued operations |
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
||
Financing activities continuing operations |
|
(151,059 |
) |
(23,967 |
) |
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(8,193 |
) |
$ |
(58,144 |
) |
Cash used in operating activities from continuing operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $21.2 million, compared to cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $18.1 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $39.3 million is primarily attributable to a $40.0 million cash payment in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 to settle the Companys arbitration matter. As part of the settlement, the Company will receive an insurance reimbursement of $12.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $6.0 million, compared to cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations of $2.7 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations of $8.7 million is attributable to the wind-down of the disposed operations.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $4.0 million, compared to cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations of $122.9 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations of $126.9 million is primarily attributable to the sale of $126.2 of marketable securities in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 to partially finance the Companys $150.4 million Accelerated Share Repurchase program.
Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $24.0 million, compared to $151.1 million for the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in cash used in financing activities from continuing operations of $127.1 million is primarily attributable to a $128.0 million decrease in repurchases of common stock. Repurchases of common stock were $22.4 million and $150.4 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
18
The adverse effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents of $3.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 is due to the impact of the strengthening United States dollar on cash and cash equivalents held in our foreign operations.
Other Matters
On November 14, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of the Companys outstanding common stock under an Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR) program. In connection with the ASR program, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with UBS Investment Bank during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Under the ASR agreement, the Company acquired and retired 3,758,457 shares at an initial price of $39.91 per share for $150.0 million plus fees of approximately $0.4 million. UBS purchased an equivalent number of shares in the open market over the nine-month period ending August 15, 2008. Pursuant to the ASR agreement, at its completion the Companys initial price under the ASR agreement was adjusted down based on the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of the Companys stock during this period. Such adjustment could be settled in cash or stock at the Companys discretion. On July 11, 2008, UBS Investment Bank completed the purchase of shares in the open market, and the Company elected to receive the price adjustment of $13.9 million in cash. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, this receipt of cash was recorded as a decrease to common stock in the full amount of $13.9 million.
Under a resolution adopted in July 2008, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at managements discretion, of up to an aggregate of $75.0 million of the Companys common stock. The resolution also authorized the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Companys common stock. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased 740,490 common shares at a cost of $23.2 million of which $22.4 million was settled in cash. At December 31, 2008, $59.5 million remained available for future stock repurchases under the resolution. As of February 4, 2009, the Company had repurchased 187,200 common shares at a cost of $6.8 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Our working capital at December 31, 2008 was $141.3 million. At December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $61.5 million and no debt. Management believes this liquidity and financial position, along with the revolving credit facility discussed below, provides sufficient liquidity to continue any contemplated stock repurchase program (depending on the price of the Companys common stock), to pursue selective acquisitions, and to consider the continuation of dividends on a quarterly basis. Restricted cash at December 31, 2008 was $2.5 million. Restricted cash represents amounts collected on behalf of certain customers and its use is restricted to the purposes specified under our contracts with these customers, and amounts on deposit with foreign banks as compensating balances for certain bank guarantees.
Under the provisions of certain long-term contracts, we may incur certain reimbursable transition period costs. During the transition period, these expenditures resulted in the use of our cash. Reimbursement of these costs may occur in the set-up phase or over the contract operating period. Related revenue may also be deferred during the set-up phase. As of December 31, 2008, $6.4 million in net costs had been incurred and reported as deferred contract costs on our consolidated balance sheet.
In June 2003, in connection with a long-term contract, the Company issued a standby letter of credit in an initial amount of up to $20.0 million, which amount was reduced to $10.0 million on April 1, 2005. The letter of credit, which expires on March 31, 2009, may be called by the customer in the event the Company defaults under the terms of the contract. The Company is currently negotiating the renewal of this letter of credit with the customer. The Company also has two letters of credit in connection with insurance policies, which total approximately $0.4 million. The letters of credit for insurance policies expire in May 2009 and automatically renew annually, thereafter.
On January 25, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement providing for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with SunTrust Bank as administrative agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and a syndicate of other lenders (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility provides for a $50.0 million revolving line of credit commitment, which may be used (i) for revolving loans, (ii) for swingline loans, subject to a sublimit of $5.0 million, and (iii) to request the issuance of letters of credit on the Companys behalf, subject to a sublimit of $25.0 million. The Company may request an increase in the commitment under the Credit Facility, such that the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility shall at no time exceed $75.0 million. On June 30, 2008, SunTrust Banks commitment automatically stepped down from $50.0 million to $35.0 million in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility. The credit available under the Credit Facility may be used, among other purposes, to refinance the Companys current indebtedness, to repurchase shares of the Companys capital stock and to finance the ongoing working capital, capital expenditure, and general corporate needs of the Company. At December 31, 2008, letters of credit totaling $10.4 million are outstanding under the Credit Facility.
Subject to applicable conditions, the Company may elect interest rates on its revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the prime lending rate as announced by SunTrust Bank (or, if higher, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or the one-month adjusted LIBO rate) (a Base Rate Borrowing), or (ii) the reserve adjusted rate per annum equal to the offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a one (1), two (2), three (3) or six (6) month period in the London Inter-Bank Market (a LIBOR Borrowing), and, in each case, plus an applicable margin that is determined by reference to the Companys then-current leverage ratio. For swingline borrowings, the Company will pay interest at the rate of interest for a one (1) month LIBOR Borrowing, plus the applicable margin, or at a rate to be separately agreed upon by the Company and the administrative agent.
19
The Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2013, at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid and all outstanding letters of credit must have been terminated or cash collateralized.
The Credit Facility, as amended by the Company and its lender on December 12, 2008, provides for the payment of specified fees and expenses, including an up-front fee and commitment and letter of credit fees, and contains customary financial and other covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all covenants in the amended Credit Facility as of December 31, 2008. The Companys obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Companys direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Guarantors) and are secured by substantially all of MAXIMUS and the Guarantors present and future tangible and intangible assets, including the capital stock of subsidiaries and other investment property.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, the Company had performance bond commitments totaling $83.4 million and $82.9 million, respectively.
On July 15, 2003, the Company entered into a capital lease financing arrangement with a financial institution, whereby the Company acquired assets pursuant to an equipment lease agreement. Rental payments for assets leased are payable over a 60-month period at an interest rate of 4.05% commencing in January 2004. On March 29, 2004, the Company entered into a supplemental capital lease financing arrangement with the same financial institution whereby the Company acquired additional assets pursuant to an equipment lease agreement. Rental payments for assets leased under the supplemental arrangement are payable over a 57-month period at an interest rate of 3.61% commencing in April 2004. Capital lease obligations of $0.4 million were outstanding related to these lease arrangements for new equipment at September 30, 2008. No capital lease obligations were outstanding at December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2008, we classified accounts receivable of $1.7 million, net of a $0.6 million discount, as long-term receivables and reported them within the other assets category on our consolidated balance sheet. These receivables had extended payment terms and collection was expected to exceed one year.
20
On December 17, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved a $0.02 increase in the quarterly cash dividend. The Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 for each share of the Companys common stock outstanding. The dividend is payable on February 27, 2009, to shareholders of record on February 13, 2009. Based on the current number of shares outstanding, the cash payment is estimated to be $2.1 million and the corresponding accrued liability is included in other accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2008 in the consolidated balance sheet.
We believe that we will have sufficient resources to meet our currently anticipated capital expenditures and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates including those related to revenue recognition and cost estimation on certain contracts, the realizability of goodwill, and amounts related to income taxes, certain accrued liabilities and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We believe that we do not have significant off-balance-sheet risk or exposure to liabilities that are not recorded or disclosed in our financial statements. While we have significant operating lease commitments for office space, those commitments are generally tied to the period of performance under related contracts. Additionally, although on certain contracts we are bound by performance bond commitments and standby letters of credit, we have not had any defaults resulting in draws on performance bonds. Also, we do not speculate in derivative transactions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition. In fiscal 2008, approximately 74% of our total revenue was derived from state and local government agencies; 7% from federal government agencies; 16% from foreign customers; and 3% from other sources, such as commercial customers. Revenue is generated from contracts with various pricing arrangements, including: (1) fixed-price; (2) performance-based criteria; (3) costs incurred plus a negotiated fee (cost-plus); and (4) time and materials. Also, some contracts contain not-to-exceed provisions. Of the contracts with not-to-exceed provisions, to the extent we estimate we will exceed the contractual limits; we treat these contracts as fixed price. For fiscal 2008, revenue from fixed-price contracts was approximately 33% of total revenue; revenue from performance-based contracts was approximately 36% of total revenue; revenue from cost-plus contracts was approximately 28% of total revenue; and revenue from time and materials contracts was approximately 3% of total revenue. A majority of the contracts with state and local government agencies have been fixed-price and performance-based, and our contracts with the federal government generally have been cost-plus. Fixed-price and performance-based contracts generally offer higher margins but typically involve more risk than cost-plus or time and materials reimbursement contracts.
We recognize revenue on general service arrangements as work is performed and amounts are earned in accordance with the Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended by SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). We consider amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
We recognize revenue on fixed-priced contracts when earned, as services are provided. For certain fixed-price contracts, primarily systems design, development and implementation, we recognize revenue based on costs incurred using estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs to be incurred in accordance with the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP 81-1). The cumulative impact of any revisions in estimated revenue and costs is recognized in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. For other fixed-price contracts, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis unless evidence suggests that revenue is earned or obligations are fulfilled in a different pattern. With fixed-price contracts, we are subject to the risk of potential cost overruns.
21
For fixed-price contracts accounted for under SOP 81-1, provisions for estimated losses on incomplete contracts are provided in full in the period in which such losses become known. Costs related to contracts may be incurred in periods prior to recognizing revenue. These costs are generally expensed. However, certain direct and incremental set-up costs may be deferred until services are provided and revenue begins to be recognized, when such costs are recoverable from a contractual arrangement. Set-up costs are costs related to activities that enable us to provide contractual services to a client. The timing of expense recognition may result in irregular profit margins.
We recognize revenue on performance-based contracts as such revenue becomes fixed or determinable, which generally occurs when amounts are billable to customers. For certain contracts, this may result in revenue being recognized in irregular increments.
Revenue on cost-plus contracts is recognized based on costs incurred plus an estimate of the negotiated fee earned. Revenue on time and materials contracts is recognized based on hours worked and expenses incurred.
Our most significant expense is cost of revenue, which consists primarily of project-related costs such as employee salaries and benefits, subcontractors, computer equipment and travel expenses. Our management uses its judgment and experience to estimate cost of revenue expected on projects. Our managements ability to accurately predict personnel requirements, salaries and other costs as well as to effectively manage a project or achieve certain levels of performance can have a significant impact on the gross margins related to our fixed-price, performance-based and time and materials contracts. If actual costs are higher than our managements estimates, profitability may be adversely affected. Service cost variability has little impact on cost-plus arrangements because allowable costs are reimbursed by the customer.
We also license software under license agreements. Software revenue is recognized in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as amended by Statement of Position 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, With Respect to Certain Transactions (SOP 98-9). Software license revenue is recognized when a customer enters into a non-cancelable license agreement, the software product has been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, there are no significant future performance obligations, the license fees are fixed or determinable and collection of the license fee is considered probable. Amounts received in advance of meeting these criteria are deferred and classified as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As required by SOP 98-9, the Company determines the value of the software component of its multiple-element arrangements using the residual method as vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements such as the support and maintenance agreements and related implementation and training services, but not for all delivered elements such as the software itself. The residual method requires revenue to be allocated to the undelivered elements based on the fair value of such elements, as indicated by VSOE. VSOE is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. Maintenance and post-contract customer support revenue are recognized ratably over the term of the related agreements, which in most cases is one year. Revenue from software-related consulting services under time and material contracts and for training is recognized as services are performed. Revenue from other software-related contract services requiring significant modification or customization of software is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method.
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, requires contracts with multiple deliverables to be divided into separate units of accounting if certain criteria are met. We apply the guidance therein and recognize revenue on multiple deliverables as separate units of accounting if the criteria are met.
22
Capitalized Software Development Costs. The Company capitalizes software development costs in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1) which are reported in continuing operations. Direct costs of time and material incurred for the development of application software for internal use are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, ranging from three to seven years. We review capitalized software development costs for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our review is based on our projection of the undiscounted future operating cash flows of the related customer projects. To the extent such projections indicate that future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying amount, we recognize a non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying amount to equal projected future discounted cash flows.
Software development costs are also capitalized in accordance with FAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed and are reported in discontinued operations. We capitalize both purchased software that is ready for resale and costs incurred internally for software development projects from the time technological feasibility is established. Capitalized software development costs are reported at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value. Upon the general release of the software to customers, capitalized software development costs for the products are amortized over the greater of the ratio of gross revenues to expected total revenues of the product or on the straight-line method of amortization over the estimated economic life of the product, which ranges from three to five years. The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment for recoverability of capitalized development costs require considerable judgment by management including, but not limited to, technological feasibility, anticipated future gross revenues, estimated economic life, and changes in software and hardware technologies. Any changes to these estimates could impact the amount of amortization expense and the amount recognized as capitalized software development costs in the consolidated balance sheet.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount we estimate to be sufficient to cover the risk of collecting less than full payment on our receivables. On a regular basis we re-evaluate our client receivables, especially receivables that are past due, and reassess our allowance for doubtful accounts based on specific client collection issues. If our clients were to express dissatisfaction with the services we have provided, additional allowances may be required.
Deferred Contract Costs. Deferred contract costs consist of contractually recoverable direct set-up costs relating to long-term service contracts in progress. These costs include direct and incremental costs incurred prior to the commencement of us providing service to enable us to provide the contracted services to our customer. Such costs are expensed over the period services are provided under the long-term service contract. We review deferred contract costs for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our review is based on our projection of the undiscounted future operating cash flows of the related customer project. To the extent such projections indicate that future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying amount, we recognize a non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying amount to equal projected future discounted cash flows.
Contingencies. From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings, including contract and employment claims, in the ordinary course of business. We assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these contingencies as well as potential ranges of probable losses and establish reserves accordingly. The amount of reserves required may change in future periods due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach to a matter such as a change in settlement strategy.
Legal and Settlement Expense. Legal and settlement expense consists of costs, net of reimbursed insurance claims, related to significant legal settlements and non-routine legal matters, including future probable legal costs estimated to be incurred in connection with those matters. Legal expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Stock-Based Compensation. Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using the modified-prospective-transition method.
Income taxes. To record income tax expense, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, income tax expense at interim reporting dates requires us to estimate our expected effective tax rate for the entire year. This process involves estimating our actual current tax liability together with assessing temporary differences that result in deferred tax assets and liabilities and expected future tax rates. Circumstances that could cause our estimates of income tax expense to change include: the impact of information that subsequently becomes available as we prepare our tax returns; revision to tax positions taken as a result of further analysis and consultation; changes in the geographic mix of our business; the actual level of pre-tax income; changes in tax rules, regulations and rates; and changes mandated as a result of audits by taxing authorities.
We may also establish tax reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions are subject to challenge and that we may not fully succeed. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts, such as the progress of a tax audit, new case law, or expiration of a statute of limitations.
Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 provides that the financial statement effects of an income tax position can only be recognized when, based on the technical merits, it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination.
23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We believe that our exposure to market risk related to the effect of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and other market risks with regard to instruments entered into for trading or for other purposes is immaterial.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation of our internal control that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including contract and employment claims, in the ordinary course of its business. The matters reported on below involve significant pending or potential claims against us.
(a) In January 2007, MAXIMUS initiated arbitration against Accenture LLP to resolve various disputes that had arisen under a subcontract between the parties in support of Accentures prime contract with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) for the Integrated Eligibility and Enrollment Services program (the Program). Among other things, the Company asserted that Accenture had breached the subcontract resulting in damages to MAXIMUS in excess of $100 million. Accenture denied MAXIMUS claims and asserted a counterclaim that MAXIMUS breached the subcontract. Accenture alleged unspecified damages which it stated could be hundreds of millions of dollars. The subcontract incorporated the terms and conditions of the prime contract which contained a limitation of liability of $250.0 million.
In February 2007, MAXIMUS terminated its subcontract with Accenture. In March 2007, HHSC announced that it was winding down its contract with Accenture. HHSC alleged a variety of damages arising from the parties operation of the Program. Accenture indicated that its damages claim against MAXIMUS in the arbitration proceeding would include damages asserted by HHSC against Accenture.
Shortly after the wind down of the Accenture contract with HHSC, MAXIMUS entered into agreements directly with HHSC to provide enrollment broker, CHIP operations and eligibility support services. The contracts for CHIP operations and eligibility support services run through December 31, 2009, and the enrollment broker contract runs through August 31, 2010.
In December 2008, MAXIMUS, Accenture and HHSC settled all claims among the parties, both the claims in the arbitration proceeding and the contract wind down claims. In connection with that settlement, MAXIMUS agreed to pay a total of $40.0 million and to provide services to HHSC valued at an additional $10.0 million. The Companys primary insurance carrier has agreed to pay $12.5 million of the amount due from MAXIMUS, which is included in due from insurance carrier in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $37.5 million in legal and settlement expense in the consolidated statements of operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company continues to pursue additional insurance recoveries from its excess insurance carriers; however, such recoveries are not assured.
(b) In November 2007, MAXIMUS was sued by the State of Connecticut in the Superior Court in the Judicial District of Hartford. MAXIMUS had entered into a contract in 2003 with the Connecticut Department of Information Technology to update the States criminal justice information system. The State claims that MAXIMUS breached its contract and also alleges negligence and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. MAXIMUS has sued its primary subcontractor on the effort (ATS Corporation) which abandoned the project before completing its obligations. Although the State did not specify damages in its complaint, it demanded payment of alleged damages of approximately $6.2 million in a letter sent to the Company in September 2007. The Company denies that it has breached its contract with the State. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the legal proceedings or any settlement negotiations or the impact they may have on the Companys operating results or financial condition.
In connection with information set forth in this Form 10-Q, the factors discussed under Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 should be considered. The risks included in the Form 10-K could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There have been no material changes to the factors discussed in our Form 10-K.
24
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(c) The following table sets forth the information required regarding repurchases of common stock that we made during the three months ended December 31, 2008:
Period |
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
||
Oct. 1, 2008 Oct. 31, 2008 |
|
624,500 |
|
30.82 |
|
624,500 |
|
$ |
62,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nov. 1, 2008 Nov. 30, 2008 |
|
23,990 |
|
$ |
32.31 |
|
23,990 |
|
$ |
62,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dec. 1, 2008 Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
92,000 |
|
34.71 |
|
92,000 |
|
$ |
59,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
740,490 |
|
$ |
31.35 |
|
740,490 |
|
|
|
(1) Under resolutions adopted and publicly announced on May 12, 2000, July 10, 2002, and April 2, 2003, our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at managements discretion, of up to an aggregate of $90.0 million of common stock under our 1997 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, in June 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of our common stock. Under a resolution adopted on July 22, 2008, which rescinds and supersedes the previous resolutions, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at managements discretion, of up to an aggregate of $75.0 million of the Companys common stock. The resolution also authorized the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Companys common stock. As of February 4, 2009, the Company had repurchased 187,200 common shares at a cost of $6.8 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
The Exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately following the Signatures. The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
25
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
MAXIMUS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ David N. Walker |
|
|
David N. Walker |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(On behalf of the registrant and as Principal |
26
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Principal Executive Officer Certification. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 906 Principal Financial Officer Certification. |
27