Edgar Filing: NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-16123

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


New York		11-3504638
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

212 West 35^th Street, 2^nd Floor, New York, NY		10001
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 356-9500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of November 4, 2013, there were 35,385,888 of the Company’s Common Shares outstanding.

CONTENTS


	PAGE
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012		3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012		5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		27

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		50

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		52

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		54

Item 6. Exhibits		54

Signatures		55

Item 1. Financial Statements.

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

(In Thousands, except for Per Share Data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Operating revenues
Electronic payment processing	$	22,176		$	21,686		$	67,299		$	63,674
Web hosting and design		4,394			4,525			13,312			13,787
Premium income		4,104			3,154			13,301			7,958
Interest income		1,244			894			3,440			2,432
Servicing fee income – NSBF portfolio		730			560			2,007			1,537
Servicing fee income – external portfolios		604			1,517			2,346			3,593
Income from tax credits		31			122			86			441
Insurance commissions		433			286			1,347			915
Other income		1,058			714			2,791			2,188

Total operating revenues	$	34,774		$	33,458		$	105,929		$	96,525


Net change in fair value of:
SBA loans		(426	)		(554	)		(1,574	)		(1,217	)
Warrant liability		—			—			—			(111	)
Credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash		—			(20	)		26			21

Total net change in fair value		(426	)		(574	)		(1,548	)		(1,307	)


Operating expenses:
Electronic payment processing costs		18,951			18,356			56,863			53,542
Salaries and benefits		5,690			5,597			18,069			16,710
Interest		1,478			1,233			4,162			3,206
Depreciation and amortization		831			763			2,454			2,275
Provision for loan losses		57			90			384			354
Other general and administrative costs		5,388			4,186			15,413			12,893

Total operating expenses		32,395			30,225			97,345			88,980


Income before income taxes		1,953			2,659			7,036			6,238
Provision for income taxes		137			1,359			2,214			2,698

Net income		1,816			1,300			4,822			3,540
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		4			7			292			30

Net income attributable to Newtek Business Services, Inc.	$	1,820		$	1,307		$	5,114		$	3,570


Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		35,322			35,200			35,275			35,632

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		38,024			37,520			37,845			36,646

Earnings per share – basic	$	0.05		$	0.04		$	0.14		$	0.10

Earnings per share – diluted	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	0.14		$	0.10

See accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012

(In Thousands, except for Per Share Data)


	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	Unaudited			(Note 1)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (includes $788 and $1,865, respectively, related to VIE)	$	7,761		$	14,229
Restricted cash		10,399			8,456
Broker receivable		19,593			16,698
SBA loans held for investment, net (includes $11,631 and $12,910, respectively, related to securitization trust VIE; net of reserve for loan losses of $1,710 and $2,589, respectively)		12,287			14,647
SBA loans held for investment, at fair value (includes $49,389 and $22,931, respectively, related to securitization trust VIE)		67,112			43,055
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $1,154 and $561, respectively)		12,495			10,871
SBA loans held for sale, at fair value		2,490			896
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net (includes $1,735 and $1,123, respectively, related to securitization trust VIE)		13,554			11,014
Servicing asset (net of accumulated amortization and allowances of $7,576 and $6,750, respectively)		6,080			4,682
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $10,515 and $10,922, respectively)		3,588			3,523
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $3,465 and $5,591, respectively)		1,310			1,558
Credits in lieu of cash		4,307			8,703
Deferred tax asset, net		3,903			2,318
Goodwill		12,092			12,092

Total assets	$	176,971		$	152,742


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	$	13,289		$	11,206
Notes payable		44,076			39,823
Note payable – securitization trust VIE		38,744			22,039
Capital lease obligation		699			632
Deferred revenue		1,407			1,437
Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash		4,307			8,703

Total liabilities		102,522			83,840


Commitments and contingencies

Equity:
Newtek Business Services, Inc. shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares (par value $0.02 per share; authorized 1,000 shares, no shares issued and outstanding)		—			—
Common shares (par value $0.02 per share; authorized 54,000 shares, 36,913 issued; 35,327 and 35,178 outstanding, respectively, not including 83 shares held in escrow)		738			738
Additional paid-in capital		61,212			60,609
Retained earnings (includes $1,466 related to consolidation of VIE on January 1, 2012)		12,120			7,008
Treasury shares, at cost (1,586 and 1,735 shares, respectively)		(1,330	)		(1,508	)

Total Newtek Business Services, Inc. shareholders’ equity		72,740			66,847
Non-controlling interests		1,709			2,055

Total equity		74,449			68,902

Total liabilities and equity	$	176,971		$	152,742

See accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

(In Thousands)


	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Condensed consolidated net income	$	4,822		$	3,540
Adjustments to reconcile condensed consolidated net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Income from tax credits		(86	)		(441	)
Accretion of interest expense		113			462
Fair value adjustments on SBA loans		1,574			1,217
Fair value adjustment on warrant liability		—			111
Fair value adjustment of credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash		(26	)		(21	)
Deferred income taxes		(1,585	)		(2,462	)
Depreciation and amortization		2,454			2,275
Accretion of discount		299			198
Provision for loan losses		384			354
Other, net		1,457			1,015
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Originations of SBA loans held for sale		(91,598	)		(55,147	)
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans held for sale		90,167			56,397
Broker receivable		(2,895	)		(5,622	)
Accounts receivable		(2,155	)		(3,631	)
Prepaid expenses, accrued interest receivable and other assets		(2,999	)		3,455
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue		2,378			(469	)
Other, net		(3,561	)		(3,128	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(1,257	)		(1,897	)


Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments in qualified businesses		—			(1,651	)
Return of investments in qualified businesses		1,532			101
Purchase of fixed assets and customer merchant accounts		(1,445	)		(1,313	)
SBA loans originated for investment, net		(28,405	)		(17,105	)
Payments received on SBA loans		4,196			3,261
Change in restricted cash		—			999
Other, net		(109	)		—

Net cash used in investing activities		(24,231	)		(15,708	)

See accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012 (CONTINUED)

(In Thousands)


	2013			2012

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (repayments) proceeds on bank lines of credit	$	4,295		$	12,829
Increase in cash due to consolidation of subsidiary		—			2,763
Proceeds from term loan		—			10,000
Repayments on bank term note payable		(313	)		(313	)
Issuance of senior notes, net of issuance costs		20,909			—
Repayments of senior notes		(4,371	)		(3,389	)
Additions to deferred financing costs		(1,108	)		(1,313	)
Change in restricted cash related to securitization		(609	)		5,053
Purchase of treasury shares		—			(926	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		150			—
Other		67			4

Net cash provided by financing activities		19,020			24,708


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(6,468	)		7,103
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period		14,229			11,201


Cash and cash equivalents – end of period	$	7,761		$	18,304


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow activities:

Reduction of credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash balances	$	4,487		$	7,903


Additions to additional paid-in capital for warrants expired previously attributable to non-controlling interests	$	—		$	330


Additions to non-controlling interests as a result of consolidation of majority owned subsidiary	$	—		$	2,291


Initial allocation of value assigned to warrants issued in financing transaction	$	—		$	1,959

See accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

Newtek Business Services, Inc. (“Newtek” or the “Company”) is a holding company for several wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries, including twelve certified capital companies which are referred to as Capcos, and several portfolio companies in which the Capcos own non-controlling or minority interests. The Company provides a “one-stop-shop” for business services to the small- and medium-sized business market and uses state of the art web-based proprietary technology to be a low cost acquirer and provider of products and services. The Company partners with companies, credit unions, and associations to offer its services.

The Company’s principal business segments are:

Electronic Payment Processing: Marketing third party credit card processing and check approval services to the small- and medium-sized business market under the name of Newtek Merchant Solutions.

Small Business Finance: The segment is comprised of Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc. (“NSBF”), a nationally licensed, U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) lender that originates, sells and services loans to qualifying small businesses, which are partially guaranteed by the SBA and CDS Business Services, Inc. d/b/a Newtek Business Credit (“NBC”) which provides receivable financing and management services.

Managed Technology Solutions: CrystalTech Web Hosting, Inc., d/b/a Newtek Technology Services (“NTS”), offers shared and dedicated web hosting, data storage and backup services, cloud computing plans, web design and related services to the small- and medium-sized business market.

All Other: Businesses formed from investments made through Capco programs and others which cannot be aggregated with other operating segments, including insurance and payroll processing.

Corporate Activities: Corporate implements business strategy, directs marketing, provides technology oversight and guidance, coordinates and integrates activities of the segments, contracts with alliance partners, acquires customer opportunities, and owns our proprietary NewTracker^® referral system. This segment includes revenue and expenses not allocated to other segments, including interest income, Capco management fee income and corporate operations expenses.

Capco: Twelve certified capital companies which invest in small- and medium-sized businesses. They generate non-cash income from tax credits and non-cash interest expense and insurance expenses in addition to cash management fees.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of Newtek, its subsidiaries and consolidated entities included herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include all wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries, and several portfolio companies in which the Capcos own non-controlling minority interest in, or those variable interest entities of which Newtek is considered to be the primary beneficiary. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Non-controlling interests are reported below net income (loss) under the heading “Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests” in the condensed consolidated statements of income (unaudited) and shown as a component of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Newtek’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, omit or condense certain footnotes and other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for an interim period may not give a true indication of the results for the entire year. The December 31, 2012 condensed consolidated balance sheet has been derived from the audited financial statements of that date but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

All financial information included in the tables in the following footnotes is stated in thousands, except per share data.

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. The level of uncertainty in estimates and assumptions increases with the length of time until the underlying transactions are complete. The most significant estimates are with respect to valuation of investments in qualified businesses, asset impairment valuation, allowance for loan losses, valuation of servicing assets, charge-back reserves, tax valuation allowances and the fair value measurements used to value certain financial assets and financial liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company operates in a number of different segments. Revenues are recognized as services are rendered and are summarized as follows:

Electronic payment processing revenue: Electronic payment processing and fee income is derived from the electronic processing of credit and debit card transactions that are authorized and captured through third-party networks. Typically, merchants are charged for these processing services on a percentage of the dollar amount of each transaction plus a flat fee per transaction. Certain merchant customers are charged miscellaneous fees, including fees for handling charge-backs or returns, monthly minimum fees, statement fees and fees for other miscellaneous services. Revenues derived from the electronic processing of MasterCard^® and Visa^® sourced credit and debit card transactions are reported gross of amounts paid to sponsor banks.

Web hosting revenue: Managed technology solutions revenue is primarily derived from monthly recurring service fees for the use of its web hosting, web design and software support services. Customer set-up fees are billed upon service initiation and are recognized as revenue over the estimated customer relationship period of 2.5 years. Payment for web hosting and related services, excluding cloud plans, is generally received one month to one year in advance. Deferred revenues represent customer payments for web hosting, web design and related services in advance of the reporting period date. Revenue for cloud related services is based on actual consumption used by a cloud customer.

Sales and Servicing of SBA Loans: NSBF originates loans to customers under the SBA program that generally provides for SBA guarantees of 50% to 90% of each loan, subject to a maximum guarantee amount. This guaranteed portion is generally sold to a third party via an SBA regulated secondary market transaction utilizing SBA Form 1086 for a price equal to the guaranteed loan amount plus a premium that includes both an upfront cash payment and the fair value of future net servicing income. Prior to October 1, 2010, NSBF recognized the revenue item “Premium on loan sales” net of capitalized loan expenses and the discount on the retained unguaranteed portion; subsequent to the adoption of fair value of SBA 7(a) loans on October 1, 2010, NSBF recognizes premium on loan sales as equal to the cash premium plus the fair value of the servicing income. Revenue is recognized on the trade date of the guaranteed portion, except as described below.

Upon recognition of each loan sale, the Company retains servicing responsibilities and receives servicing fees of a minimum of 1% of the guaranteed loan portion sold. The Company is required to estimate its adequate servicing compensation in the calculation of its servicing asset. The purchasers of the loans sold have no recourse to the Company for failure of customers to pay amounts contractually due.

Subsequent measurements of each class of servicing assets and liabilities may use either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method. NSBF has chosen to apply the amortization method to its servicing asset, amortizing the asset in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income on the underlying sold guaranteed portion of the loans and assessing the servicing asset for impairment based on fair value if and when a triggering event occurs. In the event future prepayments are significant or impairments are incurred and future expected cash flows are inadequate to cover the unamortized servicing assets, additional amortization or impairment charges would be recognized. In evaluating and measuring impairment of servicing assets, NSBF stratifies its servicing assets based on year of loan and loan term which are the key risk characteristics of the underlying loan pools. The Company uses an independent valuation specialist to estimate the fair value of the servicing asset by calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, using assumptions of prepayments, defaults, servicing costs and discount rates that NSBF believes market participants would use for similar assets. If NSBF determines that the impairment for a stratum is temporary, a valuation allowance is recognized through a charge to current earnings for the amount the amortized balance exceeds the current fair value. If the fair value of the stratum were to later increase, the valuation allowance may be reduced as a recovery. However, if NSBF determines that impairment for a stratum is other than temporary, the value of the servicing asset and any related valuation allowance is written-down.

SBA Loan Interest and Fees: Interest income on loans is recognized as earned. A loan is placed on non-accrual status if it exceeds 90 days past due with respect to principal or interest and, in the opinion of management, interest or principal on the loan is not collectible, or at such earlier time as management determines that the collectability of such principal or interest is unlikely. Such loans are designated as impaired non-accrual loans. All other loans are defined as performing loans. When a loan is designated as impaired non-accrual, the accrual of interest is discontinued, and any accrued but uncollected interest income is reversed and charged against current operations. While a loan is classified as impaired non-accrual and the future collectability of the recorded loan balance is doubtful, collections of interest and principal are generally applied as a reduction to principal outstanding.

The Company passes certain expenditures it incurs to the borrower, such as force placed insurance, insufficient funds fees, or fees it assesses, such as late fees, with respect to managing the loan. These expenditures are recorded when incurred. Due to the uncertainty with respect to collection of these passed through expenditures or assessed fees, any funds received to reimburse the Company are recorded on a cash basis as other income.

Income from tax credits: Following an application process, a state will notify a company that it has been certified as a Capco. The state or jurisdiction then allocates an aggregate dollar amount of tax credits to the Capco. However, such amount is neither recognized as income nor otherwise recorded in the financial statements since it has yet to be earned by the Capco. The Capco is entitled to earn tax credits upon satisfying defined investment percentage thresholds within specified time requirements. Newtek has Capcos operating in five states and the District of Columbia. Each statute requires that the Capco invest a threshold percentage of “certified capital” (the funds provided by the insurance company investors) in businesses defined as qualified within the time frames specified. As the Capco meets these requirements, it avoids grounds under the statute for its disqualification for continued participation in the Capco program. Such a disqualification, or “decertification” as a Capco results in a permanent recapture of all or a portion of the allocated tax credits. The proportion of the possible recapture is reduced over time as the Capco remains in general compliance with the program rules and meets the progressively increasing investment benchmarks. As the Capco progresses in its investments in Qualified Businesses and, accordingly, places an increasing proportion of the tax credits beyond recapture, it earns an amount equal to the non-recapturable tax credits and records such amount as income, with a corresponding asset called “credits in lieu of cash” in the balance sheet.

The amount earned and recorded as income is determined by multiplying the total amount of tax credits allocated to the Capco by the percentage of tax credits immune from recapture (the earned income percentage) at that point. To the extent that the investment requirements are met ahead of schedule, and the percentage of non-recapturable tax credits is accelerated, the present value of the tax credit earned is recognized currently and the asset, credits in lieu of cash, is accreted up to the amount of tax credits deliverable to the certified investors. The obligation to deliver tax credits to the certified investors is recorded as notes payable in credits in lieu of cash. On the date the tax credits are utilizable by the certified investors, the Capco decreases credits in lieu of cash with a corresponding decrease to notes payable in credits in lieu of cash.

Insurance commissions: Revenues are comprised of commissions earned on premiums paid for insurance policies and are recognized at the time the commission is earned. At that date, the earnings process has been completed and the Company can estimate the impact of policy cancellations for refunds and establish reserves. The reserve for policy cancellations is based on historical cancellation experience adjusted by known circumstances.

Other income: Other income represents revenues derived from operating units that cannot be aggregated with other business segments. In addition, other income represents one time recoveries or gains on investments. Revenue is recorded when there is strong evidence of an agreement, the related fees are fixed, the service or product has been delivered, and the collection of the related receivable is assured.

•

Receivable fees: Receivable fees are derived from the funding (purchase) of receivables from finance clients. NBC recognizes the revenue on the date the receivables are purchased at a percentage of face value as agreed to by the client. The Company also has arrangements with certain of its clients whereby it purchases the client’s receivables and charges a fee at a specified rate based on the amount of funds advanced against such receivables. The funds provided are collateralized and the income is recognized as earned.

•

Late fees: Late fees are derived from receivables NBC has purchased that have gone over a certain period (usually over 30 days) without payment. The client or the client’s customer is charged a late fee according to the agreement with the client and NBC records the fees as income in the month in which such receivable becomes past due.

•

Billing fees: Billing fees are derived from billing-only (non-finance) clients. These fees are recorded when earned, which occurs when the service is rendered.

•

Other fees: These fees include re-underwriting fees, due diligence fees, termination fees, under minimum fees, and other fees including finance charges, supplies sold to clients, NSF fees, wire fees and administration fees. These fees are charged upon funding, takeovers or liquidation of finance clients. The Company also receives commission revenue from various sources.

Electronic Payment Processing Costs

Electronic payment processing costs consist principally of costs directly related to the processing of merchant sales volume, including interchange fees, VISA^® and MasterCard^® dues and assessments, bank processing fees and costs paid to third-party processing networks. Such costs are recognized at the time the merchant transactions are processed or when the services are performed. Two of the most significant components of electronic processing expenses include interchange and assessment costs, which are set by the credit card associations. Interchange costs are passed on to the entity issuing the credit card used in the transaction and assessment costs are retained by the credit card associations. Interchange and assessment fees are billed primarily as a percent of dollar volume processed or, to a lesser extent, as a per transaction fee. In addition to costs directly related to the processing of merchant sales volume, electronic payment processing costs also include residual expenses, which represent fees paid to third-party sales referral sources. Residual expenses are paid under various formulae as contracted. These are generally linked to revenues derived from merchants successfully referred to the Company and that begin using the Company for merchant processing services.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes cash collateral relating to a letter of credit; monies due on SBA loan-related remittances and insurance premiums received by the Company and due to third parties; cash held by the Capcos restricted for use in managing and operating the Capco, making qualified investments and for the payment of income taxes; cash reserves associated with the securitization, cash set aside to purchase unguaranteed portions originated subsequent to the securitization transaction, cash held in blocked accounts used to pay down bank note payables, cash held for our payroll clients waiting to be remitted to their employees or taxing authority and a cash account maintained as a reserve against electronic payment processing chargeback losses. Following is a summary of restricted cash by segment:


(In thousands):	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Electronic payment processing	$	618	$	387
Small business finance		6,217		4,955
All other		1,358		279
Corporate activities		1,067		987
Capcos		1,139		1,848


Totals	$	10,399	$	8,456

Broker Receivable

Broker receivable represents amounts due from third parties for loans which have been traded at period end but have not yet settled.

Purchased Receivables

For clients that are assessed fees based on a discount as well as for clients that are on a prime plus fee schedule, purchased receivables are recorded at the point in time when cash is released to the client. A majority of the receivables purchased with respect to prime plus arrangements are recourse and are sold back to the client if aged over 90 days, depending on contractual agreements. Purchased receivables are included in accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets.

Investments in Qualified Businesses

The various interests that the Company acquires in its qualified investments are accounted for under three methods: consolidation, equity method and cost method. The applicable accounting method is generally determined based on the Company’s voting interest or the economics of the transaction if the investee is determined to be a variable interest entity.

Consolidation Method. Investments in which the Company directly or indirectly owns more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities, those the Company has effective control over, or those deemed to be a variable interest entity in which the Company is the primary beneficiary are generally accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting. Under this method, an investment’s financial position and results of operations are reflected within the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated, including returns of principal, dividends, interest received and investment redemptions. The results of operations and cash flows of a consolidated operating entity are included through the latest interim period in which the Company owned a greater than 50% direct or indirect voting interest, exercised control over the entity for the entire interim period or was otherwise designated as the primary beneficiary. Upon dilution of control below 50%, or upon occurrence of a triggering event requiring reconsideration as to the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the accounting method is adjusted to the equity or cost method of accounting, as appropriate, for subsequent periods.

Equity Method. Investments that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Whether or not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee’s Board of Directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee, including voting rights associated with the Company’s holdings in common, preferred and other convertible instruments in the investee. Under the equity method of accounting, an investee’s accounts are not reflected within the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee is reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cost Method. Investments not accounted for under the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under this method, the Company’s share of the net earnings or losses of such investments is not included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. However, cost method impairment charges are recognized, as necessary, in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. If circumstances suggest that the value of the investee has subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded until ultimately liquidated or realized.

The Company’s debt and equity investments have substantially been made with funds available to Newtek through the Capco programs. These programs generally require that each Capco meet a minimum investment benchmark within five years of initial funding. In addition, any funds received by a Capco as a result of a debt repayment or equity return may, under the terms of the Capco programs, be reinvested and counted towards the Capcos’ minimum investment benchmarks.

Securitization Activities

NSBF engaged in a securitization of the unguaranteed portions of its SBA 7(a) loans in 2010, 2011 and 2013. Because the transfer of these assets did not meet the criteria of a sale for accounting purposes, it was treated as a secured borrowing. NSBF continues to recognize the assets of the secured borrowing in Loans held for investment and the associated financing in Notes payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

Share – Based Compensation

All share-based payments to employees are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values using an option-pricing model at the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. The Company has elected to adopt the alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation. The alternative transition method includes a simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, which is available to absorb tax deficiencies.

Fair Value

The Company adopted the methods of fair value to value its financial assets and liabilities. The Company carries its credits in lieu of cash, prepaid insurance and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash at fair value. In addition, the Company elected on October 1, 2010 to fair value its SBA loans held for investment and SBA loans held for sale. Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the Company utilized a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:


Level 1		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2		Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate debt securities, derivative contracts and residential mortgage loans held-for-sale.

Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained residual interests in securitizations, residential mortgage servicing rights, and highly structured or long-term derivative contracts.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and nine month periods was approximately 7% and 33%, respectively. The Company recorded a discreet income tax benefit of approximately $369,000 during the period ended September 30, 2013 which impacted the rate favorably by approximately 4% in both periods. The discreet income tax benefit was attributable to a tax true-up following the filing of the Company’s 2012 state tax returns. In addition, the Company had a lower current tax provision for the quarter due to payments made for expected 2013 taxes due that have exceeded the tax computed on the current year to date income.

The Company’s U.S. Federal and state income tax returns prior to fiscal year 2009 are closed and management continually evaluates expiring statutes of limitations, audits, proposed settlements, changes in tax law and new authoritative rulings.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The ultimate deductibility of positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns is often uncertain. In order to recognize the benefits associated with a tax position taken (i.e., generally a deduction on a corporation’s tax return), the entity must conclude that the ultimate allowability of the deduction is more likely than not. If the ultimate allowability of the tax position exceeds 50% (i.e., it is more likely than not), the benefit associated with the position is recognized at the largest dollar amount that has more than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and recognized will generally result in (1) an increase in income taxes currently payable or a reduction in an income tax refund receivable or (2) an increase in a deferred tax liability or a decrease in a deferred tax asset, or both (1) and (2).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As required by the Financial Instruments Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the estimated fair values of financial instruments must be disclosed. Excluding fixed assets, intangible assets, goodwill, and prepaid expenses and other assets (noted below), substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments as defined under this standard. Fair value estimates are subjective in nature and are dependent on a number of significant assumptions associated with each instrument or group of similar instruments, including estimates of discount rates, risks associated with specific financial instruments, estimates of future cash flows and relevant available market information.

The carrying values of the following balance sheet items approximate their fair values primarily due to their liquidity and short-term or adjustable-yield nature:

•

Cash and cash equivalents

•

Restricted cash

•

Broker receivable

•

Accounts receivable

•

Notes payable

•

Accrued interest receivable (included in Prepaid expenses and other assets)

•

Accrued interest payable (included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities)

•

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

The carrying value of investments in Qualified Businesses (included in Prepaid expenses and other assets), Credits in lieu of cash and Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash as well as SBA loans held for investment and SBA loans held for sale approximate fair value based on management’s estimates.

New Accounting Standards

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11: Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). The amendments in ASU 2013-11 are intended to end inconsistent practices regarding the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits on the balance sheet. An entity will be required to present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss (“NOL”) or tax credit carryforward whenever the NOL or tax credit carryforward would be available to reduce the additional taxable income or tax due if the tax position is disallowed. An entity is required to apply the amendments prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and for interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

Reclassifications

The prior period amount reported for the accretion of discount has been reclassified on our statement of cash flows to conform to current quarter presentation.

NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

Fair Value Option Elections

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted fair value accounting concurrent with the election of the fair value option. The accounting standard relating to the fair value measurements clarifies the definition of fair value and describes methods available to appropriately measure fair value in accordance with GAAP. The accounting standard applies whenever other accounting standards require or permit fair value measurements. The accounting standard relating to the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities allows entities to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial liabilities that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as they occur. It also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to improve comparability between entities that elect different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities.

On January 1, 2008, the Company elected the fair value option for valuing its Capcos’ credits in lieu of cash, notes payable in credits in lieu of cash and prepaid insurance.

On October 1, 2010, the Company elected the fair value option for valuing its SBA 7(a) loans funded on or after that date which are included in SBA loans held for investment and SBA loans held for sale.

The Company elected the fair value option in order to reflect in its financial statements the assumptions that market participants use in evaluating these financial instruments.

Fair Value Option Election – Credits in Lieu of Cash, Prepaid Insurance and Notes Payable in Credits in Lieu of Cash

Under the cost basis of accounting, the discount rates used to calculate the present value of the credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash did not reflect the credit enhancements that the Company’s Capcos obtained from Chartis, Inc. (“Chartis”) (the renamed property and casualty holdings of American International Group, Inc., “AIG”), namely its AA+ rating at such time, for their debt issued to certified investors. Instead the cost paid for the credit enhancements was recorded as prepaid insurance and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the credit enhancements.

With the adoption of the fair value measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities and the election of the fair value option, credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash are valued based on the yields at which financial instruments would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller when the former is not under any compulsion to buy and the latter is not under any compulsion to sell, both parties having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. The accounting standards require the fair value of the assets or liabilities to be determined based on the assumptions that market participants use in pricing the financial instrument. In developing those assumptions, the Company identified characteristics that distinguish market participants generally, and considered factors specific to (a) the asset type, (b) the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset group, and (c) market participants with whom the reporting entity would transact in that market.

Based on the aforementioned characteristics and in view of the Chartis credit enhancements, the Company believes that market participants purchasing or selling its Capcos’ debt, and therefore its credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash, view nonperformance risk to be equal to the risk of Chartis nonperformance risk and as such both the fair value of credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash should be priced to yield a rate equal to comparable U.S. Dollar denominated debt instruments issued by Chartis’ parent, AIG. Because the value of notes payable in credits in lieu of cash directly reflects the credit enhancement obtained from Chartis, the unamortized cost relating to the credit enhancement will cease to be separately carried as an asset on Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and is incorporated in notes payable in credits in lieu of cash.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2013 Using:
(In thousands):	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Unrealized Gains and (Losses)

Assets

Credits in lieu of cash	$	4,307	$	—	$	4,307	$	—	$	—
SBA loans held for investment		67,112		—		—		67,112		(1,737	)

SBA loans held for sale		2,490		—		2,490		—		163


Total assets	$	73,909	$	—	$	6,797	$	67,112	$	(1,574	)


Liabilities

Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash	$	4,307	$	—	$	4,307	$	—	$	26

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using:
(In thousands):	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Unrealized Gains and (Losses)

Assets

Credits in lieu of cash	$	8,703	$	—	$	8,703	$	—	$	—
SBA loans held for investment		43,055		—		—		43,055		(851	)

SBA loans held for sale		896		—		896		—		(162	)


Total assets	$	52,654	$	—	$	9,599	$	43,055	$	(1,013	)


Liabilities

Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash	$	8,703	$	—	$	8,703	$	—	$	3

Warrants		—		—		—		—		(111	)


Total liabilities	$	8,703	$	—	$	8,703	$	—	$	(108	)

Credits in lieu of cash and Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash

The Company elected to account for both credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash at fair value in order to reflect in its condensed consolidated financial statements the assumptions that market participant’s use in evaluating these financial instruments.

Fair value measurements:

The Company’s Capcos’ debt, enhanced by Chartis insurance, effectively bears the nonperformance risk of Chartis. The closest trading comparators are the debt of Chartis’ parent, AIG. Therefore the Company calculates the fair value of both the credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash using the yields of various AIG notes with similar maturities to each of the Company’s respective Capcos’ debt (the “Chartis Note Basket”). The Company elected to discontinue utilizing AIG’s 7.70% Series A-5 Junior Subordinated Debentures because those long maturity notes began to trade with characteristics of a preferred stock after AIG received financing from the United States Government. The Company considers the Chartis Note Basket a Level 2 input under fair value accounting, since it is a quoted yield for a similar liability that is traded in an active exchange market. The Company selected the Chartis Note Basket as the most representative of the nonperformance risk associated with the Capco notes because they are Chartis issued notes, are actively traded and because maturities match credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash.

After calculating the fair value of both the credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash, the Company compares their values. This calculation is done on a quarterly basis. Calculation differences primarily due to tax credit receipt versus delivery timing may cause the value of the credits in lieu of cash to differ from that of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash. Because the credits in lieu of cash asset has the single purpose of paying the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash and has no other value to the Company, Newtek determined that the credits in lieu of cash should equal the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash.

On December 31, 2012, the yield on the Chartis Note Basket was 1.72%. As of September 30, 2013, the date the Company revalued the asset and liability, the yields on the Chartis notes averaged 1.73% reflecting changes in interest rates in the marketplace. This increase in yield increased both the fair value of the credits in lieu of cash and the fair value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash. The Company increased the value of the credits in lieu of cash to equal the value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash because the credits in lieu of cash can only be used to satisfy the liability and must equal the value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash at all times. There was no material net change in fair value reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company reported a gain of $26,000.

On December 31, 2011, the yield on the Chartis Note Basket was 5.53%. As of September 30, 2012, the date the Company revalued the asset and liability, the yields on the Chartis notes averaged 2.16% reflecting changes in interest rates in the marketplace. This decrease in yield decreased both the fair value of the credits in lieu of cash and the fair value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash. The Company decreased the value of the credits in lieu of cash to equal the value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash because the credits in lieu of cash can only be used to satisfy the liability and must equal the value of the notes payable in credits in lieu of cash at all times. The net change in fair value reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was a loss of $20,000 and a gain of $21,000, respectively.

Changes in the future yield of the Chartis Note Basket will result in changes to the fair values of the credits in lieu of cash and notes payable in credits in lieu of cash when calculated for future periods; these changes will be reported through the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income.

SBA 7(a) Loans

On October 1, 2010, the Company elected to utilize the fair value option for SBA 7(a) loans funded on or after that date. Management believed that doing so would promote its effort to both simplify and make more transparent its financial statements by better portraying the true economic value of this asset on its balance sheet and statement of income. NSBF originates, funds, and services government guaranteed loans under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act. The SBA does not fully guarantee the SBA 7(a) Loans: An SBA 7(a) Loan is bifurcated into a guaranteed portion and an unguaranteed portion, each accruing interest on the principal balance of such portion at a per annum rate in effect from time to time. NSBF originates variable interest loans, usually set at a fixed index to the Prime rate that resets quarterly. Primarily, NSBF has made SBA 7(a) loans carrying guarantees of 75% and 85% with some originations at 90% for SBA qualified export type businesses; from 2009 through early 2011 under a special program, most of the loans NSBF originated carried a guarantee of 90%. NSBF, both historically and as a matter of its business plan, sells the guaranteed portions via SBA Form 1086 into the secondary market when the guaranteed portion becomes available for sale upon the closing and full funding of the SBA 7(a) loan and retains the unguaranteed portions. Management recognized that the economic value in the guaranteed portion did not inure to NSBF at the time of their sale but rather when the guaranty attached at origination; amortization accounting by its nature does not recognize this increase in value at the true time when it occurred. Under the fair value option, the value of the guarantee is recorded when it economically occurs at the point of the creation of the loan, and is not delayed until when the sale occurs. Contemporaneously, the value of the unguaranteed portion will also be determined to reflect the full, fair value of the loan.

Although the fair value election is for the entire SBA 7(a) loan, the Company primarily sells the guaranteed portions at the completion of funding. The need to record the fair value for the guaranteed portion of the loan will primarily occur when a guaranteed portion is not traded at period end (“SBA loans held for sale”). The unguaranteed portion retained is recorded under “SBA loans held for investment.”

SBA Loans Held for Investment

For loans that completed funding before October 1, 2010, SBA loans held for investment are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, net deferred loan origination costs and the allowance for loan losses. For loans that completed funding on or after October 1, 2010, management elected to fair value SBA loans held for investment within the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs utilizing Level 3 unobservable inputs which reflect the Company’s own expectations about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset (including assumptions about risk). The Company considers the pricing reflected in its securitization activities to be the best indicator of the fair value discount used to measure loans held for investment. As discussed in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company was able to securitize its unguaranteed portions of its SBA 7(a) loans and issued notes to investors with S&P ratings of “AA” and “A.”

The fair value measurement, currently recorded as a 7.5% upfront discount of the unguaranteed principal balance of SBA loans held for investment, is based upon internal quantitative data on our portfolio with respect to historical default rates and future expected losses as well as the investor price paid for the senior interest in our unguaranteed loans with respect to the 2013 securitized transaction, and adjusted for the estimated servicing and interest income to be retained by the trust over an estimated repayment term of three years. This was further adjusted to reflect the estimated default rate on the senior notes based on the default rate on our loan portfolio, assuming a worst case scenario of no recoveries. Should the performance of the underlying loans to the senior notes change, this could impact the assumptions used in the estimated repayment term as well as the estimated default rate and thus result in a higher or lower discount rate taken in the future; management reviews these assumptions

regularly. If a loan measured at fair value is subsequently impaired, then the fair value of the loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The value of impaired loans is factored into the 7.5% fair value discount on our overall portfolio. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the impaired loans involve management’s judgment in the use of market data and third party estimates regarding collateral values. Such estimates are further discounted by 20% – 80% to reflect the cost of liquidating the various assets under collateral. Any subsequent increases or decreases in any of the inputs would result in a corresponding decrease or increase in the reserve for loan loss or fair value of SBA loans, depending on whether the loan was originated prior or subsequent to October 1, 2010. Because the loans bear interest at a variable rate, NSBF does not have to factor in interest rate risk.

Below is a summary of the activity in SBA loans held for investment, at fair value for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively, (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Year Ended December 31, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	43,055		$	21,857
SBA loans held for investment, originated		28,353			24,076
Payments received		(2,559	)		(2,027	)
Fair value loss		(1,737	)		(851	)

Balance, end of period	$	67,112		$	43,055

SBA Loans Held For Sale

For guaranteed portions funded, but not yet traded at each measurement date, management elected to fair value SBA loans held for sale within the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value utilizing Level 2 assets. These inputs include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments or have values determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market. The secondary market for the guaranteed portions is extremely robust with broker dealers acting as primary dealers. NSBF sells regularly into the market and can quickly price its loans for sale. The Company values the guaranteed portion based on market prices equal to the guaranteed loan amount plus a premium that includes both an upfront cash payment (utilizing quoted prices) and the value of a stream of payments representing servicing income received in excess of NSBF’s servicing cost (valued using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market).

Other Fair Value Measurements

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis are as follows (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2013 Using:
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Assets

Impaired loans	$	6,257	$	—	$	—	$	6,257	$	(1,692	)
Other real-estate owned		946		—		946		—		(45	)


Total assets	$	7,203	$	—	$	946	$	6,257	$	(1,737	)


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using:
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Assets

Impaired loans	$	6,965	$	—	$	—	$	6,965	$	(822	)
Other real-estate owned		534		—		534		—		(168	)


Total assets	$	7,499	$	—	$	534	$	6,965	$	(990	)

Impaired loans

Impairment of a loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral less estimated liquidation costs if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans for which the carrying amount is based on fair value of the underlying collateral are included in assets and balances include fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis, both at initial recognition of impairment and on an on-going basis until recovery or charge-off of the loan amount. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the impaired loans involve management’s judgment in the use of market data and third party estimates regarding collateral values. Such estimates are further discounted by 20% – 80% to reflect the cost of liquidating the various assets under collateral. Valuations in the level of impaired loans and corresponding impairment affect the level of the reserve for loan losses. Any subsequent increases or decreases in any of the inputs would result in a corresponding decrease or increase in the reserve for loan loss or fair value of SBA loans, depending on whether the loan was originated prior or subsequent to October 1, 2010.

Other real-estate owned (included in Prepaid expenses and other assets)

The estimated fair value of other real-estate owned is calculated using observable market information, including bids from prospective purchasers and pricing from similar market transactions where available. The value is generally discounted between 20-25% based on market valuations as well as expenses associated with securing the Company’s interests. Where bid information is not available for a specific property, the valuation is principally based upon recent transaction prices for similar properties that have been sold. These comparable properties share comparable demographic characteristics. Other real estate owned is generally classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

NOTE 4 – SBA LOANS:

SBA loans are geographically concentrated in New York (12.18%). Below is a summary of the activity in the SBA loans held for investment, net of SBA loan loss reserves for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2012	$	57,702
SBA loans funded for investment		28,353

Fair value adjustment		(1,737	)

Payments received		(4,195	)

Provision for SBA loan losses		(384	)

Discount on loan originations, net		191

Other real estate owned		(531	)

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	79,399

Below is a summary of the activity in the reserve for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2012	$	2,589
SBA loan loss provision		384
Recoveries		39
Loan charge-offs		(1,302	)

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	1,710

Below is a summary of the activity in the SBA loans held for sale for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2012	$	896
Originations of SBA loans held for sale		91,598
Fair value adjustment		163
SBA loans sold		(90,167	)

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	2,490

All loans are priced at the Prime interest rate plus approximately 2.75% to 3.75%. The only loans with a fixed interest rate are defaulted loans of which the guaranteed portion sold is repurchased from the secondary market by the SBA, while the unguaranteed portion of the loans still remains with the Company. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, SBA loans receivable held for investment with adjustable interest rates amounted to $80,614,000 and $58,382,000, respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company funded approximately $119,951,000 and $72,433,000 in loans and sold approximately $90,167,000 and $56,937,000 of the guaranteed portion of the loans, respectively. Receivables from loans traded but not settled of $19,593,000 and $16,698,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, are presented as broker receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The outstanding balances of loans past due over ninety days and still accruing interest as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 amounted to $128,000 and $1,128,000, respectively.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total impaired non-accrual loans amounted to $6,257,000 and $6,965,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and for the year ended December 31, 2012, the average balance of impaired non-accrual loans was $6,664,000 and $6,935,000, respectively, and approximately $1,976,000 and $2,204,000 of the allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustment were allocated against such impaired non-accrual loans, respectively.

The following is a summary of SBA loans held for investment as of:


(in thousands):	September 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Fair Value			Cost Basis			Fair Value			Cost Basis
Due in one year or less	$	—		$	54		$	—		$	40
Due between one and five years		—			4,777			—			4,534
Due after five years		72,378			10,054			46,585			13,741

Total		72,378			14,885			46,585			18,315
Less: Allowance for loan losses		—			(1,710	)		—			(2,589	)
Less: Deferred origination fees, net		—			(888	)		—			(1,079	)
Less: Fair value adjustment		(5,266	)		—			(3,530	)		—

Balance (net)	$	67,112		$	12,287		$	43,055		$	14,647

The payment status of gross SBA loans held for investment is as follows:


	(in thousands)
Days Past Due	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Current	$	80,458	$	52,556
30 – 89		420		4,251
> 90		128		1,128
Non-performing		6,257		6,965

Balance (net)	$	87,263	$	64,900

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its loan portfolio by employing a risk rating system that is similar to the Uniform Classification System which is the asset classification system adopted by the Federal Financial Institution Examinations Council. The Company’s risk rating system is granular with multiple risk ratings in both the Acceptable and Substandard categories. Assignment of the ratings are predicated upon numerous factors, including credit risk scores, collateral type, loan to value ratios, industry, financial health of the business, payment history, other internal metrics/analysis, and qualitative assessments.

Risk ratings are refreshed as appropriate based upon considerations such as market conditions, loan characteristics, and portfolio trends. The Company’s gross SBA loans held for investment recorded at cost by credit quality indicator are as follows:


	(in thousands)
Risk Rating	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Acceptable	$	7,808	$	9,153
Other assets special mention		2,579		2,926
Substandard		4,093		5,894
Doubtful		396		333
Loss		9		9

Balance	$	14,885	$	18,315

NOTE 5 – SERVICING ASSET:

Servicing rights are recognized as assets when SBA loans are accounted for as sold and the rights to service those loans are retained. The Company measures all separately recognized servicing assets initially at fair value, if practicable. The Company reviews capitalized servicing rights for impairment which is performed based on risk strata, which are determined on a disaggregated basis given the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans. The predominant risk characteristics are loan term and year of loan origination.

The changes in the value of the Company’s servicing rights for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows:


(in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	4,682
Servicing rights capitalized		2,226
Servicing assets amortized		(828	)

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	6,080

The carrying value of the capitalized servicing asset was $6,080,000 and $4,682,000 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, while the estimated fair value of capitalized servicing rights was $7,467,000 and $6,067,000 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The estimated fair value of servicing assets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was determined using a discount rate of 11%, weighted average prepayment speeds ranging from 1% to 14%, depending upon certain characteristics of the loan portfolio, weighted average life of 5.00 years, and an average default rate of 5%.

The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others within the NSBF originated portfolio were $337,748,000 and $271,548,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others which were not originated by NSBF and are outside of the Newtek portfolio were $174,621,000 and $176,988,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE AND CAPITAL LEASES:

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had notes payable and capital leases comprised of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Notes payable:
Capital One lines of credit (NSBF)
Guaranteed line	$	17,851	$	12,000
Unguaranteed line		9,149		11,854
Summit Partners Credit Advisors, L.P. (NBS)		8,559		8,288
Sterling National bank line of credit (NBC)		7,822		6,674
Capital One term loan (NTS)		695		1,007

Total notes payable		44,076		39,823
Note payable – securitization trust DS)		38,744		22,039

Total notes payable	$	82,820	$	61,862


Capital lease obligation	$	699	$	632

In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company leased certain software with a term of 4 years. The useful life of the software was estimated to be between 7 – 10 years and includes a bargain purchase element at lease expiration. As a result, the transaction has been recorded as a capital lease and has a capitalized cost of approximately $63,000.

In July 2013 the SBA lender, received an extension on the maturity of its warehouse lines of credit, totaling $27 million, with Capital One, N.A. from September 30, 2013 to May 31, 2015, at which time the outstanding balance will be converted into a three-year term loan. The extension also enhanced the terms of the credit facilities by removing the $15 million funding sublimit for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans NSBF originates, and increasing the advance rate to 55% from 50% for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans.

In March 2013, the Company completed a third securitization resulting in $20,900,000 of notes being issued in a private placement transaction. The SBA lender transferred the unguaranteed portions of SBA loans in the amount of $23,569,000 and an additional $5,900,000 for new loans to be funded subsequent to the transaction to a special purpose entity, Newtek Small Business Loan Trust 2013-1. The notes received an “A” rating by S&P, and the final maturity date of the notes is June 25, 2038. The proceeds of the transaction have been and will be used to repay debt and originate new loans.

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED SHARES:

The Company had three share-based compensation plans as of September 30, 2013 and 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, compensation cost charged to income for those plans was $566,000 and $406,000, respectively, of which $448,000 and $320,000 are included in salaries and benefits, and $118,000 and $86,000 are included in other general and administrative costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

During the third quarter of 2013, the Company granted certain employees an aggregate of 70,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at $176,000 with 10,000 vesting on March 1, 2016 and 60,000 vesting on July 31, 2016. The fair value of these grants was determined using the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. The restricted shares are forfeitable upon early voluntary or involuntary termination of the employee’s employment. Upon vesting, the grantee will receive one common share for each restricted share vested. Under the terms of the plan, these share awards do not include voting rights until the shares vest. The Company recorded $10,000 in share-based compensation in the third quarter of 2013 in connection with the vesting period associated with these grants.

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company granted certain employees and executives an aggregate of 80,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at $174,000 with a vesting date of March 1, 2016. The fair value of these grants was determined using the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. The restricted shares are forfeitable upon early voluntary or involuntary termination of the employee’s employment. Upon vesting, the grantee will receive one common share for each restricted share vested. Under the terms of the plan, these share awards do not include voting rights until the shares vest. In connection with the vesting period associated with these grants, the Company recorded $16,000 and $23,000 in share-based compensation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company granted certain employees, executives and directors an aggregate of 300,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at $556,000. The employee and executive grants have a vesting date of March 1, 2016 while the directors’ vest July 1, 2015. The fair value of these grants was determined using the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. The restricted shares are forfeitable upon early voluntary or involuntary termination of the employee’s employment. Upon vesting, the grantee will receive one common share for each restricted share vested. Under the terms of the plan, these share awards do not include voting rights until the shares vest. The Company recorded $49,000 and $126,000 in share-based compensation during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, in connection with the vesting period associated with these grants.

In the second quarter of 2012, Newtek granted certain employees and executives an aggregate of 124,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at $184,000. The grants vest on July 1, 2014. The fair value of these grants was determined using the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. The restricted shares are forfeitable upon early voluntary or involuntary termination of the employee’s employment. Upon vesting, the grantee will receive one common share for each restricted share vested. Under the terms of the plan, these share awards do not include voting rights until the shares vest. The Company charged $10,000 and $13,000 to share-based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively and $25,000 and $38,000 to share-based compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively in connection with the vesting period associated with these grants.

In March 2011, Newtek granted certain employees, executives and board of directors an aggregate of 1,142,000 restricted shares valued at $1,941,000. The grants vest on July 1, 2014. The fair value of these grants was determined using the fair value of the common shares at the grant date. The restricted shares are forfeitable upon early voluntary or involuntary termination of the employee. Upon vesting, the grantee will receive one common share for each restricted share vested. Under the terms of the plan, these share awards do not include voting rights until the shares vest. The Company recorded $134,000 and $126,000 in share-based compensation in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively and $378,000 and $369,000, in share-based compensation in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, in connection with the vesting period associated with these grants.

NOTE 8 – INCOME PER SHARE:

Basic income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The effect of common share equivalents is included in the calculation of diluted loss per share only when the effect of their inclusion would be dilutive.

The calculations of income per share were:


	Three months ended September 30:				Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands except per share data):	2013		2012		2013		2012

Numerator for basic and diluted EPS – income available to common shareholders	$	1,820	$	1,307	$	5,114	$	3,570

Denominator for basic EPS – weighted average shares		35,322		35,200		35,275		35,632
Effect of dilutive securities		2,702		2,320		2,570		1,014

Denominator for diluted EPS – weighted average shares		38,024		37,520		37,845		36,646


Earnings per share: Basic	$	0.05	$	0.04	$	0.14	$	0.10


Earnings per share: Diluted	$	0.05	$	0.03	$	0.14	$	0.10


The amount of anti-dilutive shares/units excluded from above is as follows:
Stock options and restricted shares		36		—		12		750
Warrants		—		50		—		50
Contingently issuable shares		83		83		83		83

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

In the ordinary course of business and from time to time, we are named as a defendant in various legal proceedings. The Company evaluates such matters on a case by case basis and its policy is to contest vigorously any claims it believes are without compelling merit.

We recognize a liability for a contingency in accrued expenses and other liabilities when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, we accrue the most likely amount of such loss, and if such amount is not determinable, then we accrue the minimum in the range as the loss accrual. The determination of the outcome and loss estimates requires significant judgment on the part of management.

The Company is currently involved in various contract claims and litigation matters. In addition, and as fully described in Item 1. Legal Proceedings, during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 the Federal Trade Commission amended an existing complaint in the matter Federal Trade Commission v. WV Universal Management, LLC et al. to include Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC (“UPS”), the Company’s merchant processing subsidiary, as an additional defendant on one count. The Company does not believe that the facts or the FTC’s legal theory support the FTC’s allegations against UPS as set forth in the complaint, and the Company intends to vigorously challenge the FTC’s claims. As such, we have not established a loss contingency for this matter.

Management has determined that, in the aggregate, the pending legal actions should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. In addition, we believe that any amount that could be reasonably estimated of potential loss or range of potential loss is not material.

In May 2013, the automated clearing house (“ACH”) provider used by the Company’s payroll processing subsidiary, PMT Payroll, LLC (“PMT”), ceased processing payments which resulted in the inability or refusal of the ACH provider’s processing bank to send the corresponding credits to PMT’s customers’ employees. The total amount debited from PMT’s customer accounts and unsuccessfully credited to its’ customers’ employees was approximately $1,318,000. Upon learning of this failure, PMT and the Company immediately paid all funds owing directly to any of its affected customers’ employees. Of this amount, the Company has successfully recovered approximately $814,000 to date from the provider’s bank. The Company is currently working with legal counsel to recover the remaining funds and has been vigorously working with its customers’ banks to process returns. We may also initiate litigation to pursue the claim. At this time, the Company believes it is reasonably possible a loss may occur if the Company is unsuccessful in causing the affected banks to process the remaining returns. While such a loss is possible, the Company does not believe that it is probable or that the amount can be estimated at this time.

NOTE 10 – SEGMENT REPORTING:

Operating segments are organized internally primarily by the type of services provided. The Company has aggregated similar operating segments into six reportable segments: Electronic payment processing, Small business finance, Managed technology solutions, All other, Corporate and Capcos.

The Electronic payment processing segment is a processor of credit card transactions, as well as a marketer of credit card and check approval services to the small- and medium-sized business market. Expenses include direct costs (included in a separate line captioned electronic payment processing costs), salaries and benefits, and other general and administrative costs all of which are included in the respective caption on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

The Small business finance segment consists of Small Business Lending, Inc., a lender that primarily originates, sells and services government guaranteed SBA 7(a) loans to qualifying small businesses through NSBF, its licensed SBA lender; the Texas Whitestone Group which manages the Company’s Texas Capco; and NBC which provides accounts receivable financing, billing and accounts receivable maintenance services to businesses. NSBF generates revenues from sales of loans, servicing income for those loans retained or contracted to service by NSBF and interest income earned on the loans themselves. The lender generates expenses for interest, salaries and benefits, depreciation and amortization, and provision for loan losses, all of which are included in the respective caption on the condensed consolidated statements of income. NSBF also has expenses such as loan recovery expenses, loan processing costs, professional fees, and other expenses that are all included in the other general and administrative costs caption on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

The Managed technology solutions segment consists of NTS, acquired in July 2004. NTS’s revenues are derived primarily from web hosting services and consist of web hosting and set up fees. NTS generates expenses such as salaries and benefits, and depreciation and amortization, which are included in the respective caption on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income, as well as professional fees, licenses and fees, rent, and general office expenses, all of which are included in other general and administrative costs in the respective caption on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

The All other segment includes revenues and expenses primarily from qualified businesses that received investments made through the Company’s Capcos which cannot be aggregated with other operating segments. The two largest entities in the segment are Newtek Insurance Agency, LLC, an insurance sales operation, and Business Connect, LLC, a provider of sales and processing services. Also included in this segment are: Newtek Payroll Services, a provider of payroll management, payment and tax reporting services, Exponential of New York, LLC, an entity determined to be a subsidiary on January 1, 2012, and Advanced Cyber Security Systems, LLC, (“ACS”), a start-up company formed to offer web-based security solutions to the marketplace.

Corporate activities represent revenue and expenses not allocated to our segments. Revenue includes interest income and management fees earned from Capcos (and included in expenses in the Capco segment). Expenses primarily include corporate operations related to broad-based sales and marketing, legal, finance, information technology, corporate development and additional costs associated with administering the Capcos.

The Capco segment, which consists of the twelve Capcos, generates non-cash income from tax credits, interest income and gains from investments in qualified businesses which are included in other income. Expenses primarily include non-cash interest and insurance expense, management fees paid to Newtek (and included in the Corporate activities revenues), legal, and auditing fees and losses from investments in qualified businesses.

Management has considered the following characteristics when making its determination of its operating and reportable segments:

•

the nature of the product and services;

•

the type or class of customer for their products and services;

•

the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and

•

the nature of the regulatory environment (for example, banking, insurance, or public utilities).

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The following table presents the Company’s segment information for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and total assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):


	For the three months ended September 30, 2013			For the three months ended September 30, 2012			For the nine months ended September 30, 2013			For the nine months ended September 30, 2012
Third Party Revenue
Electronic payment processing	$	22,177		$	21,687		$	67,303		$	63,678
Small business finance		7,575			6,737			23,399			17,538
Managed technology solutions		4,455			4,526			13,449			13,789
All other		689			517			1,992			1,400
Corporate activities		250			200			650			654
Capcos		42			125			131			581

Total reportable segments		35,188			33,792			106,924			97,640
Eliminations		(414	)		(334	)		(995	)		(1,115	)

Consolidated Total	$	34,774		$	33,458		$	105,929		$	96,525


Inter-Segment Revenue
Electronic payment processing	$	735		$	470		$	2,030		$	1,259
Small business finance		61			50			195			74
Managed technology solutions		123			167			387			566
All other		283			234			789			857
Corporate activities		1,054			818			2,700			2,084
Capcos		192			202			614			616

Total reportable segments		2,448			1,941			6,715			5,456
Eliminations		(2,448	)		(1,941	)		(6,715	)		(5,456	)

Consolidated Total	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—


Income (loss) before income taxes
Electronic payment processing	$	1,879		$	1,742		$	6,179		$	5,256
Small business finance		1,728			1,984			5,932			4,928
Managed technology solutions		881			1,172			2,818			3,388
All other		(311	)		(179	)		(1,213	)		(738	)
Corporate activities		(1,847	)		(1,674	)		(5,722	)		(5,403	)
Capcos		(377	)		(386	)		(958	)		(1,193	)

Totals	$	1,953		$	2,659		$	7,036		$	6,238


Depreciation and amortization
Electronic payment processing	$	84		$	171		$	289		$	581
Small business finance		329			239			896			664
Managed technology solutions		327			318			989			919
All other		50			6			152			22
Corporate activities		40			28			124			83
Capcos		1			1			4			6

Totals	$	831		$	763		$	2,454		$	2,275


	As of September 30, 2013		As of December 31, 2012
Identifiable assets
Electronic payment processing	$	8,059	$	12,465
Small business finance		135,008		104,155
Managed technology solutions		11,950		12,022
All other		3,666		1,762
Corporate activities		9,066		5,726
Capco		9,222		16,612


Consolidated Total	$	176,971	$	152,742

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction and Certain Cautionary Statements

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to the results of operations and financial position of the Company together with its subsidiaries. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.

The statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated future financial performance, business prospects, legislative developments and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, we note that a variety of factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results expressed in the forward-looking statements such as intensified competition and/or operating problems in its operating business projects and their impact on revenues and profit margins or additional factors as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Capcos operate under a different set of rules in each of the six jurisdictions which place varying requirements on the structure of our investments. In some cases, particularly in Louisiana, we don’t control the equity or management of a qualified business but that cannot always be presented orally or in written presentations.

Executive Overview

For the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company reported income before income taxes of $1,953,000, a $706,000 or a 27% decrease over $2,659,000 for the same quarter of 2012. Net income increased to $1,820,000 in the third quarter of 2013 from $1,307,000 in the same quarter of 2012. Favorably impacting our net income in both the three and nine month periods was a benefit to reconcile the prior year provision to the filed tax returns. The effect was a reduction in our effective tax rate of approximately 4% for the year. Total revenues increased by $1,316,000 to $34,774,000 from $33,458,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, due to increased revenues in the Electronic payment processing, the Small business finance, All other and the Corporate segments, offset by decreases in revenues in our Managed technology solutions and Capco segments.

In Electronic payment processing, the segment had an increase in revenue primarily due to growth in processing volumes due to the addition of several larger volume processing merchants as well as year over year growth in processing from existing merchants. This increase in revenue was partially offset by a decrease in operating margin, resulting in an 8% increase in income before income taxes. In the Small business finance segment, the SBA lender expanded its total volume of loan originations growing the total amount funded by $15,700,000, a 59% increase over the year ago period. Notwithstanding a decline in the third party servicing portfolio due to a contraction of the FDIC portfolio, we added a new external servicing client at the end of the prior quarter, increasing our aggregate portfolio by 5% at September 30, 2013. In addition, we added an additional $400,000,000 in external servicing at the start of the fourth quarter 2013, bringing our aggregate portfolio to over $1 billion. Total external servicing fee income decreased by 60%, however, the servicing income earned on the NSBF portfolio increased by 29%, and interest income improved by 40% as a result of the average outstanding performing portfolio of SBA loans held for investment, which increased by $26,226,000 over the same quarter of 2012. Overall, the lending segment reported $1,728,000 in income before taxes for the third quarter of 2013, a 13% decrease compared with the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Managed technology solutions segment revenue remained essentially unchanged at $4,455,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a $71,000 decrease compared with three months ended September 30, 2012. The segment had an increase in web design revenue, which was offset by a decline in web hosting revenue compared with the same quarter in 2012. Total expenses increased by 7%, resulting in a $291,000 decrease in income before income taxes between quarters. In the All other segment, total revenue increased by 33% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012, due primarily to the acquisition of a health and benefits insurance portfolio serviced by NIA, as well as additional clients added to our payroll processing company. Increases in salaries and benefits, as well as costs associated with a new start-up company, ACS, also included in this segment offset the increase to revenue and resulted in a $132,000 increase in loss before income taxes for the quarter over quarter period. The loss before income taxes in the Corporate segment increased by 10% to $1,847,000, due primarily to an increase in marketing expense in connection with the Company’s television ad campaign, and the loss in the Capco segment remained essentially unchanged decreasing by 2% to $377,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

On October 1, 2013, the company filed a Form N-2 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s intention is to file an election to be regulated as a Business Development Company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 prior to the completion of an offering, and intends to operate subsequently as an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company. The Company also intends to elect to be treated as a Regulated Investment Company

(“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering primarily to expand our small to medium-sized business, (“SMB”) lending, make direct investments in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objectives and strategies described in the prospectus, and for general corporate purposes. We believe that transitioning to a BDC and RIC will provide us with access to lower-cost capital and a business structure conducive to expanding our lending activities and will assist in maximizing our value to shareholders by, among other things, permitting us to value our assets and controlled portfolio companies at fair value. As a BDC, we will seek to generate both current income and capital appreciation primarily through loans originated by our small business finance platform and our equity investments in certain portfolio companies that we control. While our primary investment focus as a BDC will continue to be making loans and providing business services to the SMB market through our controlled portfolio companies, we may also make opportunistic investments in larger or smaller companies. We expect to continue to grow our business organically, both directly and through our controlled portfolio companies, as we have historically.

In July 2013 the SBA lender received an extension on the maturity of its warehouse lines of credit, totaling $27 million, with Capital One, N.A. from September 30, 2013 to May 31, 2015, at which time the outstanding balance will be converted into a three-year term loan. The extension also enhanced the terms of the credit facilities by removing the $15 million funding sub-limit for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans NSBF originates, and increasing the advance rate to 55% from 50% for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans.

Business Segment Results:

The results of the Company’s reportable segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are discussed below:

Electronic Payment Processing


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Electronic payment processing	$	22,176	$	21,686	$	490			2	%
Interest income		1		1		—			—	%

Total revenue		22,177		21,687		490			2	%

Expenses:
Electronic payment processing costs		18,939		18,308		631			3	%
Salaries and benefits		808		1,099		(291	)		(26	)%
Professional fees		111		79		32			41	%
Depreciation and amortization		84		171		(87	)		(51	)%
Insurance expense – related party		12		48		(36	)		(75	)%
Other general and administrative costs		344		240		104			43	%

Total expenses		20,298		19,945		353			2	%

Income before income taxes	$	1,879	$	1,742	$	137			8	%

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Electronic payment processing (“EPP”) revenue increased $490,000 or 2% between years. Revenue increased primarily due to growth in the average monthly processing volume per merchant of 5%. The increase in the average monthly processing volume per merchant is due in part to the addition of several larger volume processing merchants as well as year-over-year growth in processing volumes from existing merchants. The overall increase in revenue between years due to growth in processing volumes and the average number of merchants serviced was partially offset by lower average pricing between years. A significant percentage of new merchants added, typically the higher volume merchants, are priced at interchange plus, which carries a lower “margin” (processing revenues less electronic payment processing costs), while at the same time, a significant percentage of those merchants who have left the Company were priced at tiered rate, which carries a higher margin. This combination along with competitive pricing seen in the industry has resulted in price compression and overall lower revenues.

EPP costs increased $631,000 or 3% between years, while margin decreased to 14.54% in 2013 from 15.35% in 2012. New lower contract pricing from the company’s third-party processor favorably impacted the margin percentage between periods but such favorable impact was more than offset by lower prices for our services associated with the mix of new merchants added between periods as discussed above. Overall, the decrease in margin dollars was $141,000 between years.

Salaries and benefits decreased $291,000 or 26% between years principally as the result of a reduction in staffing levels and a reduction in accrued bonuses based on management’s current estimate for the year. The number of average full time employees (“FTE”) for the three month period decreased from 67 to 60 over the years. Depreciation and amortization decreased $87,000 between years as the result of previously acquired merchant portfolios of intangible assets becoming fully amortized between periods. Other general and administrative costs increased $104,000 or 43% between years predominately as a result of increased marketing expenses. Remaining costs decreased $4,000 or 3% between years.

Income before income taxes increased $137,000 to $1,879,000 in 2013 from $1,742,000 in 2012. The increase in income before income taxes was principally due to an increase in revenue, the reduction in staffing and related costs and depreciation and amortization cost between years offset by a reduction in margin of $141,000.


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Electronic payment processing	$	67,299	$	63,674	$	3,625			6	%
Interest income		4		4		—			—	%

Total revenue		67,303		63,678		3,625			6	%

Expenses:
Electronic payment processing costs		56,826		53,494		3,332			6	%
Salaries and benefits		2,671		3,186		(515	)		(16	)%
Professional fees		328		198		130			66	%
Depreciation and amortization		289		581		(292	)		(50	)%
Insurance expense – related party		37		48		(11	)		(23	)%
Other general and administrative costs		973		915		58			6	%

Total expenses		61,124		58,422		2,702			5	%

Income before income taxes	$	6,179	$	5,256	$	923			18	%

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

EPP revenue increased $3,625,000 or 6% between years. Revenue increased primarily due to growth in processing volumes and the effect of card association fee increases passed through to merchants. In addition, a change in the frequency of assessing a security compliance measurement fee to certain merchants from one measurement period per year to two times per year (at a reduced rate per measurement period) also positively affected revenues on a year over year basis by approximately $400,000. Processing volumes were favorably impacted by an increase in the average number of processing merchants under contract between periods of 1%. In addition, growth in revenue between periods increased due to an increase of approximately 6% in the average monthly processing volume per merchant. The increase in the average monthly processing volume per merchant is due in part to the addition of several larger volume processing merchants as well as year-over-year growth in processing volumes from existing merchants. The overall increase in revenue between years (due to growth in processing volumes and the average number of merchants serviced) was partially offset by lower average pricing between years due to both competitive pricing considerations, particularly for larger processing volume merchants, and the mix of merchant sales volumes realized between periods.

EPP costs increased by $3,332,000 or 6% between years. EPP costs in 2013 and 2012 included provisions for charge-back losses of $442,000 and $1,150,000, respectively. The provision for charge-back losses in 2012 included losses of $731,000 related to a group of merchants affiliated with one of its independent sales agents. The group of merchants related to such sales agent was unilaterally approved by a former senior manager of the EPP division and such charge-back losses resulted from violations of credit policy by such senior manager. EPP margin decreased from 15.9% in 2012 to 15.5% in 2013. Margin was favorably impacted by the reduction in provisions for charge-backs between years by 1.1%. In addition, margin was favorably impacted by the change in timing of assessing the security compliance measurement fee noted above and new lower contract pricing from the company’s third-party processor. However, the favorable impact on margin of the aforementioned factors were slightly more than offset by lower average pricing between years due to both competitive pricing considerations, particularly for larger volume merchants, and the mix of merchant sales volumes realized between periods. Overall, the increase in margin dollars was $293,000 between years.

Salaries and benefits decreased $515,000 or 16% between years principally as the result of a reduction in staffing levels and a reduction in accrued bonuses based on management’s current estimate for the year. Average FTE’s for the nine month period decreased from 67 to 62 between years. Professional fees increased $130,000 principally due to costs incurred in assessing the loss related to and the actions of the agent and the former senior management of EPP related to the charge-back losses associated with a group of merchants discussed above. Depreciation and amortization decreased $292,000 between periods as the result of previously acquired customer merchant portfolio becoming fully amortized between periods. Remaining costs increased $47,000 or 5% between years. During 2012, office relocation costs of approximately $50,000 were incurred.

Income before taxes increased $923,000 to $6,179,000 in 2013 from $5,256,000 in 2012. The increase in income before taxes was principally due to the increase in margin of $293,000 due to the reasons noted above and the decreases in other costs, principally payroll and related costs and depreciation and amortization cost between years.

Small Business Finance


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Premium income	$	4,104		$	3,154		$	950			30	%
Servicing fee – NSBF portfolio		730			566			164			29	%
Servicing fee – external portfolio		604			1,511			(907	)		(60	)%
Interest income		1,239			888			351			40	%
Other income		898			618			280			45	%

Total revenue		7,575			6,737			838			12	%


Net change in fair value of:
SBA loans held for sale		(70	)		(72	)		2			3	%
SBA loans held for investment		(356	)		(482	)		126			26	%

Total net change in fair value		(426	)		(554	)		128			23	%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		1,794			1,527			267			17	%
Interest		1,387			1,098			289			26	%
Professional fees		280			209			71			34	%
Depreciation and amortization		329			239			90			38	%
Provision for loan losses		57			90			(33	)		(37	)%
Insurance expense – related party		48			20			28			140	%
Other general and administrative costs		1,526			1,016			510			50	%

Total expenses		5,421			4,199			1,222			29	%

Income before income taxes	$	1,728		$	1,984		$	(256	)		(13	)%

Business Overview

The Small business finance segment is comprised of NSBF which is a non-bank SBA lender that originates, sells and services loans for its own portfolio as well as portfolios of other institutions and NBC which provides accounts receivable financing and billing services to businesses. As such, revenue is derived primarily from premium income generated by the sale of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans, interest income on SBA loans held for investment and held for sale, servicing fee income on the guaranteed portions of SBA loans sold, servicing income for loans originated by other lenders for which NSBF is the servicer, and financing and billing services, classified as other income above, provided by NBC. Most SBA loans originated by NSBF charge an interest rate equal to the Prime rate plus an additional percentage amount; the interest rate resets to the current Prime rate on a monthly or quarterly basis, which will result in changes to the amount of interest accrued for that month and going forward and a re-amortization of a loan’s payment amount until maturity.

Accounting Policy

On October 1, 2010, the Company elected to utilize the fair value option for SBA 7(a) loans funded on or after that date. For these fair value loans, premium on loan sales equals the cash premium and servicing asset paid by the purchaser in the secondary market, the discount created on the unguaranteed portion from the sale which formerly reduced premium income is now included in the fair value line item, and, by not capitalizing various transaction expenses, the salary and benefit and loan processing expense lines portray a value closer to the cash cost to operate the lending business. The fair value measurement, currently recorded as a 7.5% upfront discount of the unguaranteed principal balance of SBA loans held for investment, is based upon internal quantitative data on our portfolio with respect to historical default rates and future expected losses as well as the investor price paid for the senior interest in our unguaranteed loans with respect to the 2013 securitized transaction, and adjusted for the estimated servicing and interest income to be retained by the trust over an estimated repayment term of three years. This was further adjusted to reflect the estimated default rate on the senior notes based on the default rate on our loan portfolio, assuming a

worst case scenario of no recoveries. Should the performance of the underlying loans of the senior notes change, this could impact the assumptions used in the estimated repayment term as well as the estimated default rate and thus result in a higher or lower discount rate taken in the future; management reviews these assumptions regularly. If a loan measured at fair value is subsequently impaired, then the fair value of the loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The value of impaired loans is factored into the 7.5% fair value discount on our overall portfolio. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the impaired loans involve management’s judgment in the use of market data and third party estimates regarding collateral values. Such estimates are further discounted by 20% – 80% to reflect the cost of liquidating the various assets under collateral. Any subsequent increases or decreases in any of the inputs would result in a corresponding decrease or increase in the reserve for loan loss or fair value of SBA loans, depending on whether the loan was originated prior or subsequent to October 1, 2010. Because the loans bear interest at a variable rate, NSBF does not have to factor in interest rate risk.

Consideration in arriving at the provision for loan loss includes past and current loss experience, current portfolio composition, future estimated cash flows, and the evaluation of real estate and other collateral as well as current economic conditions. For all loans originated on or prior to September 30, 2010, management performed a loan-by-loan review for the estimated uncollectible portion of non-performing loans; subsequent to September 30, 2010, management began recording all loan originations on a fair value basis which requires a valuation reduction of the unguaranteed portion of loans held for investment to a level that takes into consideration future losses. This valuation reduction is reflected in the line item above: Net Change in Fair Value of SBA Loans Held for Investment.

Small Business Finance Summary


	Three months ended September 30, 2013					Three months ended September 30, 2012
	# Loans		In thousands			# Loans		In thousands

Loans sold in the quarter		43	$	32,240			25	$	21,378
Loans originated in the quarter		52	$	42,299			34	$	26,632
Premium income recognized		—	$	4,104			—	$	3,154

Average sale price as a percent of principal balance (1)				110.74	%				112.41	%

(1)	Premiums greater than 110.00% must be split 50/50 with the SBA. The premium income recognized above and weighted average net sale price reflect amounts net of split with the SBA.

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized $4,104,000 of premium income from 43 loans sold aggregating $32,240,000 as compared with $3,154,000 of premium income from 25 loans sold aggregating $21,378,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Premiums on guaranteed loan sales averaged 110.74% with 1% servicing for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 compared with 112.41% with 1% servicing for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change

Total NSBF originated servicing portfolio (2)	$	444,691	$	328,855	$	115,836			35	%
Third party servicing portfolio		174,621		258,773		(84,152	)		(33	)%

Aggregate servicing portfolio	$	619,312	$	587,628	$	31,684			5	%


Total servicing income earned NSBF portfolio	$	730	$	566	$	164			29	%
Total servicing income earned external portfolio		604		1,511		(907	)		(60	)%

Total servicing income earned	$	1,334	$	2,077	$	(743	)		(36	)%

(2)	Of this amount, total average NSBF originated portfolio earning servicing income was $322,739,000 and $244,455,000 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We are the contractor managing and servicing portfolios of SBA 7(a), USDA and other loans acquired by the FDIC from failed financial institutions, and we assist the FDIC in the packaging of these loans for sale. During November 2012 and April 2013 the FDIC was successful in selling a significant group of loans with our assistance, which resulted in a reduction in current and future servicing income from the FDIC, offset by the addition of servicing income from other third party financial institutions. Our existing servicing facilities and personnel perform these activities supplemented by contract workers as needed. The size of the portfolio we will service for the FDIC, and thus the revenue earned, varies and depends on the level of bank failures and the needs of the FDIC in managing portfolios acquired from those banks as well as the success of being able to sell such portfolios. We continue to add other third party loan servicing contracts in 2013 which we expect will mitigate the declining FDIC portfolio.

The $743,000 decrease in servicing fee income was attributable primarily to the reduction of FDIC servicing income which decreased by $1,041,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease was offset by an increase in other third party loan servicing of $134,000. The average third party servicing portfolio including the FDIC portfolio decreased to $160,391,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $258,810,000 for the same three month period in 2012. In addition, servicing fees received on the NSBF portfolio increased by $164,000 quarter over quarter and was attributable to the expansion of the NSBF portfolio, in which we earn servicing income. The portfolio increased from an average of $244,455,000 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012 to an average of $322,739,000 for the same three month period in 2013. This increase was the direct result of increased loan originations in the last three months of 2012 and the nine months of 2013.

Interest income increased by $351,000 for the three month period ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. This increase was attributable to the average outstanding performing portfolio of SBA loans held for investment increasing to $76,337,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $50,111,000 for the same period in 2012.

Other income increased by $280,000 for the three month period ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to a $275,000 increase at NSBF. The increase was attributable to consulting fees of $183,000 from the FDIC and $50,000 packaging fee income as a result of the increase in the number of loans originated period over period as well as an increase in income from late payments of $27,000.

The change in fair value associated with SBA loans held for sale is related to the amount of unsold guaranteed loans during a period, the timing of when those loans sell and the change in premium being received on those loans, as discussed above. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 there was a decrease of $255,000 in the amount of unsold guaranteed loans when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was offset by the change in premium percentages on those loans period over period.

The decrease in the change in fair value on SBA loans held for investment of $126,000 is primarily a result of a reduction of the upfront discount recognized on unguaranteed loans, decreasing to 7.5% from 9.5% during the fourth quarter of 2012, resulting in a cumulative positive adjustment in the change in fair value of SBA loans held for investment. This reduction was determined based upon internal quantitative data on our portfolio with respect to historical default rates and future expected losses, as well as the investor price paid for the senior interest in our unguaranteed loans with respect to our securitized transactions, adjusted for the estimated servicing and interest income retained by the trust over an estimated repayment term of three years, and further adjusted to reflect the estimated default rate on the senior notes based on the default rate on our loan portfolio, assuming a worst case scenario of no recoveries. The Company further reduced the change in fair value on SBA loans by approximately $275,000 as of September 30, 2013 to ensure that the fair value of the portfolio is properly reflected at 7.5%. The decrease in the fair value on SBA loans held for investment, was offset by increased loan originations period over period. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, loans originated, held for investment aggregated $10,429,000 as compared to $6,169,000 of loans originated, held for investment for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Salaries and benefits increased by $267,000 primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefit costs and the addition of staff in most departments at NSBF. Headcount at NSBF increased by 40% from 45 at September 30, 2012 to 63 at September 30, 2013. The increase in salaries as a result of additional headcount was offset by a reduction in accrued bonuses based on management’s current assessment.

Interest expense increased by $289,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012, due to an increase of $190,000 of interest expense resulting from the 2013 Securitization which closed in March 2013. NSBF also experienced an increase of $68,000 in interest expense in connection with the Capital One line of credit as result of increased borrowings. NBC experienced an increase of $31,000 in interest expense under the Sterling credit facility due to increased borrowings associated with an increased accounts receivable portfolio.

Professional fees for the three months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $71,000 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 primarily due to increased accounting fees of $96,000 and the addition of temporary help of $33,000. Additionally, trustee fees increased period over period by approximately $14,000 as a result of the 2013 securitization which was not in place as of September 30, 2012. These increases were offset by a reduction in legal expense period over period of approximately $72,000.

Loan Loss Reserves and Fair Value Discount


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change

Total reserves and discount, beginning of period	$	6,602		$	5,628		$	974			17	%
Provision for loan loss		57			90			(33	)		(37	)%
Discount, loans held for investment at fair value (3)		356			482			(126	)		(26	)%
Charge offs, Net		(65	)		(98	)		33			34	%

Total reserves and discount, end of period	$	6,950		$	6,102		$	848			14	%


Gross portfolio balance, end of period	$	87,077		$	59,860		$	27,217			45	%
Total impaired nonaccrual loans, end of period	$	6,141		$	7,264		$	(1,123	)		(15	)%

(3)

In 2012, the upfront discount taken on unguaranteed loans was reduced from 11% to 9.5%, and further reduced to 7.5%, where it remains at September 30, 2013. This reduction was based upon internal quantitative data on our portfolio with respect to historical default rates and future expected losses. The Company also utilized the investor price paid for the senior interest in our unguaranteed loans with respect to the 2013 securitized transaction, adjusted for the estimated servicing and interest income to be retained by the trust over an estimated repayment term of three years. This was further adjusted to reflect the estimated default rate on the senior notes based on the default rate on our loan portfolio, assuming a worst case scenario of no recoveries.

The combined provision for loan loss and discount, loans held for investment at fair value decreased from $572,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to $413,000 for the same period in 2013, a net decrease of $159,000. The allowance for loan loss, together with the cumulative fair value adjustment related to the SBA loans held for investment, increased from $6,102,000, or 10.2% of the gross portfolio balance of $59,860,000 at September 30, 2012, to $6,950,000, or 8.0% of the gross portfolio balance of $87,077,000 at September 30, 2013. Total impaired non-accrual loans decreased on a percentage basis from $7,264,000 or 12.1% of the total portfolio at September 30, 2012 to $6,141,000 or 7.1% at September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, $1,964,000 or 28.2% and $1,961,000 or 32.2%, respectively, of the allowance for loan losses and fair value discount was allocated as specific reserve against such impaired non-accrual loans. The year over year reduction in non-performing loans as a percentage of the gross performing portfolio balance results from an improvement in the overall economic climate. The year over year reduction in the specific reserve reflects both the relatively high level of overall collateralization on the non-performing portfolio as well as the increase in the portion of that portfolio making periodic payments pending return to performing status, reducing the need for a specific reserve at this time.

Other general and administrative costs increased by $510,000 due primarily to an additional $222,000 in marketing costs relating to the Company’s television ad campaign, rent and telephone expense as a result of taking on additional space in our Long Island office, as well as adding an office in California and additional expenses associated with servicing our internal, growing portfolio at NSBF. The majority of the remaining difference of $288,000 was attributable to additional reserves recorded at NBC.

The increase of loan originations and interest, generated by the addition to and enhanced performance of the portfolio, were not sufficient to offset lost servicing income from the FDIC portfolio, as well as increases in salary, interest and other general and administrative expenses. The resulting pretax income of $1,728,000 was a 13% decline vs. the same three month period in 2012.


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Premium income	$	13,301		$	7,958		$	5,343			67	%
Servicing fee – NSBF portfolio		2,007			1,641			366			22	%
Servicing fee – external portfolio		2,346			3,488			(1,142	)		(33	)%
Interest income		3,409			2,404			1,005			42	%
Management fees – related party		—			293			(293	)		(100	)%
Other income		2,336			1,754			582			33	%

Total revenue		23,399			17,538			5,861			33	%


Net change in fair value of:
SBA loans held for sale		163			(154	)		317			206	%
SBA loans held for investment		(1,737	)		(1,063	)		(674	)		(63	)%
Warrant liability		—			(111	)		111			100	%

Total net change in fair value		(1,574	)		(1,328	)		(246	)		(19	)

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		5,602			4,379			1,223			28	%
Interest		3,927			2,644			1,283			49	%
Professional fees		799			561			238			42	%
Depreciation and amortization		896			664			232			35	%
Provision for loan losses		384			354			30			8	%
Insurance expense – related party		142			20			122			610	%
Other general and administrative costs		4,143			2,660			1,483			56	%

Total expenses		15,893			11,282			4,611			41	%

Income before income taxes	$	5,932		$	4,928		$	1,004			20	%

Small Business Finance Summary


	Nine months ended September 30, 2013					Nine months ended September 30, 2012
(In thousands):	# Loans		$ Amount			# Loans		$ Amount

Loans sold in period		112	$	90,167			69	$	56,397
Loans originated in period		121	$	119,951			69	$	72,143
Premium income recognized			$	13,301				$	7,958

Average net sale price (4)				112.43	%				111.86	%

(4)	Premiums greater than 110.00% must be split 50/50 with the SBA. The premium income recognized above and weighted average net sale price reflect amounts net of split with the SBA.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized $13,301,000 of premium income from 112 loans sold aggregating $90,167,000. During the nine months of 2012, the Company recognized $7,958,000 of premium income from 69 loans sold totaling $56,397,000. The increase in premium income is the result of an increased number of loans sold and an increase in average premium period over period. Premiums on guaranteed loan sales averaged 112.43% with 1% servicing for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared with 111.86% for the nine months September 30, 2012.

Servicing Portfolios and related Servicing Income


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change

Total NSBF originated servicing portfolio (5)	$	444,691	$	328,855	$	115,836			35	%
Third party servicing portfolio		174,621		258,773		(84,152	)		(33	)%

Aggregate servicing portfolio	$	619,312	$	587,628	$	31,684			5	%


Total servicing earned NSBF portfolio		2,007		1,641		366			22	%
Total servicing income earned external portfolio		2,346		3,488		(1,142	)		(33	)%

Total servicing income earned	$	4,353	$	5,129	$	(776	)		(15	)%

(5)	Of this amount, total average NSBF originated portfolio earning servicing income was $301,368,000 and $232,201,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Servicing fees received on the NSBF portfolio increased by $366,000 period over period and was attributable to the expansion of the NSBF originated portfolio in which we earn servicing income, which increased from an average of $232,201,000 for the nine month period ending September 30, 2012 to an average of $301,368,000 for the same nine month period in 2013. This increase was the direct result of increased loan originations in the last quarter of 2012 and the first nine months of 2013. Third party servicing income decreased by $1,142,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same nine month period in 2012 and was attributable primarily to the decrease in FDIC servicing income of $1,597,000 as a result of the sale of a portion of that portfolio. This decrease was offset by an increase in other third party loan servicing of $455,000. The average third party servicing portfolio, excluding the FDIC portfolio, increased from $14,443,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 to $74,853,000 for the same nine month period in 2013.

Interest income increased by $1,005,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of the average outstanding performing portfolio of SBA loans held for investment increasing to $67,982,000 from $46,343,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Other income increased by $582,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. The increase is partially attributable to a $188,000 increase at NBC due to an increase in net investments on accounts receivable from an average of $8,000,000 to an average of $8,600,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively as well as an increase in the merchant cash advance program in which we earn commission revenue. Additionally, NSBF’s other income increased by $394,000 due mostly to consulting fee income of $183,000 from the FDIC, increased loan recovery reimbursements of $75,000 and an increase in packaging and late fee income of $126,000 for the same nine month period.

The change in fair value associated with SBA loans held for sale of $317,000 is related to the amount of unsold guaranteed loans during a period, the timing of when those loans sell and the change in premium being received on those loans, as discussed above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 there was an increase in the amount of unsold guaranteed loans of $1,321,000 while during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 there was a decrease of $960,000 in the amount of unsold guaranteed loans.

The increase in the change in fair value on SBA loans held for investment of $674,000 is a result of the amount of unguaranteed loans originated during each period and the upfront discount recognized on unguaranteed loans being reduced from 11% to 9.5% in the first quarter 2012 which resulted in a fair value discount reduction of $474,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, loans originated, held for investment aggregated $16,989,000 as compared to $28,353,000 of loans originated, held for investment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in the change in fair value associated with the increase in originations and first quarter 2012 discount reduction aggregated $1,326,000 and was offset by a further reduction of the upfront discount recognized on unguaranteed loans, from 9.5% to 7.5% during the fourth quarter of 2012, resulting in a cumulative positive adjustment in the change in fair value of SBA loans held for investment of $355,000. This rate reduction was determined based upon internal quantitative data on our portfolio with respect to historical default rates and future expected losses, as well as the investor price paid for the senior interest in our unguaranteed loans with respect to our securitized transactions, adjusted for the estimated servicing and interest income retained by the trust over an estimated repayment term of three years, and further adjusted to reflect the estimated default rate on the senior notes based on the default rate on our loan portfolio, assuming a worst case scenario of no recoveries. An additional reduction of the discount was taken during the third quarter of 2013 to ensure that the fair value of the portfolio is properly reflected at 7.5%.

Salaries and benefits increased by $1,223,000 primarily due to the addition of staff in all departments. NSBF headcount increased by 31.7% from an average of 41 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to an average of 54 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in salaries as a result of additional headcount was offset by a reduction in accrued bonuses based on management’s current assessment.

Interest expense increased by $1,283,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012, due primarily to an increase of $650,000 of interest expense associated with the Summit financing transaction which closed in April 2012 reflecting only 5 months of expense for the period ended September 30, 2012 vs. nine months expense for 2013. Interest expense for Summit includes interest, payment-in-kind interest, discount on the valuation of the warrant and amortization of deferred financing costs. Additionally, NSBF experienced an increase in interest expense of $330,000 in connection with the closing of the 2013 securitization transaction and an additional $254,000 increase related to the Capital One line of credit which increased from an average outstanding balance of $8,875,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $13,383,000 for the same period in 2013. NBC experienced an increase of $108,000 in interest expense under the Sterling credit facility which had average outstanding borrowings of $4,800,000 and $7,900,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively. These were offset by a decrease of $21,000 in other interest expense related to investor remittances.

Professional fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $238,000 when compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to the addition of temporary staffing costs of $143,000 and increased accounting fees of $140,000. These increases were offset by a reduction in legal expense period over period of approximately $72,000.

Loan Loss Reserves and Fair Value Discount


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change

Total reserves and discount, beginning of period	$	6,092		$	5,566		$	526			9	%
Provision for loan loss		384			354			30			8	%
Discount, loans held for investment at fair value (6)		1,737			1,063			674			63	%
Charge offs (net of recoveries)		(1,263	)		(881	)		(382	)		(43	)%

Total reserves and discount, end of period	$	6,950		$	6,102		$	848			14	%


Gross portfolio balance, end of period	$	87,077		$	59,860		$	27,217			45	%
Total impaired nonaccrual loans, end of period	$	6,141		$	7,264		$	(1,123	)		(15	)%

(6)

The combined provision for loan loss and net change in fair value increased from $1,417,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $2,121,000 for the same period in 2013, a net increase of $704,000 period over period. The allowance for loan loss together with the cumulative adjustment related to SBA loans held for investment increased from $6,102,000 or 10.2% of the gross portfolio balance of $59,860,000 at September 30, 2012 to $6,950,000 or 8.0% of the gross portfolio balance of $87,077,000 at September 30, 2013. The decrease in reserve percentage reflects the positive performance of the portfolio. Total impaired non-accrual loans decreased from $7,264,000 or 12.1% of the total portfolio at September 30, 2012 to $6,141,000 or 7.1% at September 30, 2013 with $1,964,000 or 32.2% and $1,961,000 or 28.2% of the allowance for loan losses and fair value discount being allocated against such impaired non-accrual loans, respectively. The year over year reduction in non-performing loans results from an improvement in the overall economic climate.

Other general and administrative costs increased by $1,483,000 and were mostly attributable to additional marketing costs of $350,000 relating to the Company’s television ad campaign, additional reserves recorded at NBC, increased loan origination costs of $257,000, increased rent and facilities costs of $233,000 and other expense of $97,000 at NSBF.

The increase of loan originations and the size of the portfolio, combined with improvements in interest income, generated by the addition to and enhanced performance of the portfolio, and the addition of other income were sufficient to offset the decrease in servicing income from the FDIC and additional interest, salaries, servicing and origination expenses. The resulting pretax income of $5,932,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was a 20% improvement over pretax income of $4,928,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Managed Technology Solutions


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Web hosting and design	$	4,455	$	4,526	$	(71	)		(2	)%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		1,300		1,254		46			4	%
Interest		44		19		25			132	%
Professional fees		115		135		(20	)		(15	)%
Depreciation and amortization		327		318		9			3	%
Insurance expense – related party		—		16		(16	)		(100	)%
Other general and administrative costs		1,788		1,612		176			11	%

Total expenses		3,574		3,354		220			7	%

Income before income taxes	$	881	$	1,172	$	(291	)		(25	)%

Revenue is derived primarily from recurring contracted fees for hosting websites for shared hosting, dedicated servers and cloud instances (the “plans”). Less than 4% of revenues were derived from contracted services to design and maintain web sites. Revenue between periods decreased $71,000, or 2%, to $4,455,000 in 2013. Total revenue included an increase in web design revenue of $55,000, offset by a $126,000 decrease in web hosting revenue between periods. The decrease in web hosting revenue is the result of a decrease in the average monthly number of total plans by 5,601 or 11% between periods to 44,304 plans in 2013 from 49,905 plans in the third quarter of 2012. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue was an increase in the average monthly revenue per plan of 8% to $31.80 in 2013 from $29.40 in 2012. This reflects a growth in cloud instances and customers purchasing higher cost plans including additional options and services as well as the effect of a pricing increase in March 2013. The average number of cloud instances increased by 19 to an average of 680 from 661 in 2012. The decrease in the average total plans occurred in the shared and dedicated segments. The average monthly number of dedicated server plans in 2013, which generate a higher monthly fee versus shared hosting plans, decreased by 275 between periods, or 19%, to an average of 1,166 from an average of 1,441 in 2012. The average monthly number of shared hosting plans in the third quarter of 2013 decreased by 5,346, or 11%, to an average of 42,458 from 47,804 in 2012. While competition from other web hosting providers as well as alternative website services continued to have an overall negative effect on web hosting plan count and revenue growth between periods, MTS experienced a lower rate of decline in web hosting revenues in the period as a result of the March 2013 pricing increase and an expanded product platform offering.

It continues to be management’s intent to increase revenues and margin per plan through higher service offerings to customers, although this may result in a lower number of plans in place overall. Management has broadened the Company’s focus beyond the Microsoft web platform by now providing its platform capabilities to include open source web applications which have become increasingly attractive to web developers and resellers.

Total expenses of $3,574,000 in 2013 increased $220,000 or 7%, from $3,354,000 in 2012. MTS segment salaries and benefits in 2013 increased $46,000 or 4% between years to $1,300,000. MTS salaries and benefits are subject to project capitalization accounting rules and are also allocated out to other Newtek segments depending on the nature of work performed by MTS for such other segments. The number of FTE’s remained flat at 100 between years while a reduction in work performed by staff on company-wide development efforts and other segment projects resulted in the net increase in salary and benefit costs retained within MTS. Professional fees decreased $20,000 principally due to a decrease in consulting costs between years. Depreciation and amortization increased $9,000 between years to $327,000 due to an increase in capital expenditures in the latter part of 2012 (including a capital lease obligation of $632,000 for a new company-wide telephone system) and the timing of 2013 planned capital expenditures. Other general and administrative costs increased $176,000 between years primarily as a result of increases in hardware maintenance and support costs of $24,000, principally due to the restructuring of previous contracts in those areas, additional marketing costs of $48,000, an increase in utility costs of $17,000, an increase in Domain costs of $13,000, and an increase in bad debt expense of $90,000. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of telephone costs of $22,000 between years.

Income before income taxes decreased by $291,000 to $881,000 in 2013 from $1,172,000 in 2012. The decrease in profitability was principally due to a decline in web hosting revenue between years, an increase in salary and related benefit costs, and an increase in other general and administrative costs partially offset by an increase in web design related revenue and related margin contribution between years.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013		2012		$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Web hosting and design	$	13,449	$	13,789	$	(340	)		(2	)%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		3,815		3,807		8			0	%
Interest		74		62		12			19	%
Professional fees		434		385		49			13	%
Depreciation and amortization		989		919		70			8	%
Insurance expense – related party		—		16		(16	)		(100	)%
Other general and administrative costs		5,319		5,212		107			2	%

Total expenses		10,631		10,401		230			2	%

Income before income taxes	$	2,818	$	3,388	$	(570	)		(17	)%

Revenue is derived primarily from recurring contracted fees for hosting websites for shared hosting, dedicated servers and cloud instances (the “plans”). Less than 4% of revenues were derived from contracted services to design and maintain web sites. Revenue between periods decreased $340,000, or 2%, to $13,449,000 in 2013. Total revenue included a decrease in web hosting revenue of $589,000 or 4% and an increase in web design revenue of $249,000 between periods. The decrease in web hosting revenue is the result of a decrease in the average monthly number of total plans by 5,728 or 11% between periods to 45,721 plans in 2013 from 51,449 plans in 2012. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue was an increase in the average monthly revenue per plan of 10% to $32.68 in 2013 from $29.78 in 2012. This reflects a growth in cloud instances and customers purchasing higher cost plans including additional options and services as well as the effect of a pricing increase in March 2013. The average number of cloud instances increased by 56 to an average of 675 from 620 in 2012. The decrease in the average total plans occurred in the shared and dedicated segments. The average monthly number of dedicated server plans in 2013, which generate a higher monthly fee versus shared hosting plans, decreased by 279 between periods, or 18%, to an average of 1,246 from an average of 1,525 in 2012. The average monthly number of shared hosting plans in 2013 decreased by 5,505, or 11%, to an average of 43,799 from 49,304 in 2012. While competition from other web hosting providers as well as alternative website services continued to have an overall negative effect on web hosting plan count and revenue growth between periods, MTS experienced a lower rate of decline in web hosting revenues in the period as a result of the March 2013 pricing increase and an expanded product platform offering.

Total expenses of $10,631,000 in 2013 increased $230,000 from $10,401,000 in 2012. MTS segment salaries and benefits increased $8,000 between years to $3,815,000. MTS salaries and benefits are subject to project capitalization accounting rules and are also allocated out to other Newtek segments depending on the nature of work performed by MTS for such other segments. The number of average staff positions decreased by 4% between periods, resulting in a reduction of salary expense of $143,000 between years. In addition, benefit costs decreased $171,000 due to a lower bonus provision between periods. The decrease in salaries and total benefit costs of $314,000 noted above were offset by a reduction in work performed by staff on company-wide development efforts and other segment projects resulting in the net increase in salary and benefit costs retained within MTS of $8,000. Professional fees increased $49,000 principally due to a corresponding increase in web design development revenues between periods. Depreciation and amortization increased $70,000 between periods to $989,000 due to an increase in capital expenditures in the latter part of 2012 (including a capital lease obligation of $632,000 for a new company-wide telephone system) and the timing of 2013 planned capital expenditures. Other general and administrative costs increased $107,000 or 2% between years primarily as a result of increases in hardware maintenance and support costs of $162,000, principally due to the restructuring of previous contracts in those areas, additional marketing costs of $49,000, an increase in travel related costs of $20,000 and an increase in bad debt expense of $106,000. These increases were offset by a reduction in building occupancy costs (rent and utility costs) of $172,000 and telephone costs of $62,000.

Income before income taxes decreased $570,000 to $2,818,000 in 2013 from $3,388,000 in 2012. The decrease in profitability was principally due to a decline in web hosting revenue between periods partially offset by an increase in web design related revenues and related margin contribution between periods.

All Other


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenues:
Insurance commissions	$	433		$	286		$	147			51	%
Insurance commissions – related party		90			114			(24	)		(21	)%
Other income		141			98			43			44	%
Other income-related party		25			19			6			32	%

Total revenue		689			517			172			33	%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		597			487			110			23	%
Professional fees		188			68			120			176	%
Depreciation and amortization		50			6			44			733	%
Insurance expense – related party		—			9			(9	)		(100	)%
Other general and administrative costs		165			126			39			31	%

Total expenses		1,000			696			304			44	%

Loss before income taxes	$	(311	)	$	(179	)	$	(132	)		(74	)%

The All Other segment includes revenues and expenses primarily from Newtek Insurance Agency, LLC (“NIA”), Newtek Payroll Services (“PAY”) and qualified businesses that received investments made through the Company’s Capco programs which cannot be aggregated with other operating segments.

In December 2012, the Company invested in Advanced Cyber Security Systems, LLC (“ACS”), a start-up company formed to offer web-based security solutions to the marketplace. ACS is accounted for as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and recorded a loss before income taxes of $49,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Insurance commissions – related party represents commissions earned by NIA on policies sold to Newtek and its subsidiaries, previously eliminated within the segment until the third quarter of 2012 and now included in the corresponding segment, and Other income – related party represents fees charged by Newtek Payroll Services, LLC to Newtek and subsidiaries. Both are eliminated upon consolidation.

Total revenue increased by $172,000, or 33% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 primarily due to the acquisition of a health and benefits insurance portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2012. The portfolio, which was purchased by an affiliated company and serviced by NIA, comprises commercial health-related policies. Total insurance commission revenue increased by $123,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared with the three months ended September 30, 2012. Combined other income increased by $49,000, or 42%, and includes a $33,000 increase in revenue related to payroll services provided by PAY. The total number of payroll clients grew by 53% increasing from 238 at September 30, 2012 to 363 at September 30, 2013.

Salaries and benefits increased by $110,000, or 23%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. Additional staff was added at NIA to service the health portfolio acquired in the fourth quarter of 2012, and also at PAY to service the additional payroll clients added throughout 2013. The $120,000 increase in professional fees, which includes broker commission expense, is consistent with the increase in NIA’s commission income. There was also a $48,000 increase in legal expense incurred by PAY in connection with the recouping of funds related to a failure by an ACH provider in May 2013, as more fully discussed in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies. The $44,000 increase in depreciation and amortization expense is related to the insurance book of business acquired in December 2012 and the $39,000 increase in other general and administrative costs is primarily related to increases in marketing and other expenses at NIA.


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Insurance commissions	$	1,347		$	915		$	432			47	%
Insurance commissions – related party		173			114			59			52	%
Other income		411			311			100			32	%
Other income – related party		61			60			1			2	%

Total revenue		1,992			1,400			592			42	%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		1,924			1,536			388			25	%
Professional fees		464			210			254			121	%
Depreciation and amortization		152			22			130			591	%
Insurance expense – related party		—			9			(9	)		(100	)%
Other general and administrative costs		665			361			304			84	%

Total expenses		3,205			2,138			1,067			50	%

Loss before income taxes	$	(1,213	)	$	(738	)	$	(475	)		(64	)%

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

Total revenue increased by $592,000, or 42% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Total insurance commissions increased by $491,000 and are primarily related to the commercial health book of business acquired in December 2012. The $101,000 increase in combined other income period over period, was related to PAY, which increased the total number of payroll clients from 238 at September 30, 2012 to 363 at September 30, 2013.

Total expenses increased by $1,067,000 period over period primarily due to a $388,000 increase in salaries and benefits; the majority of the increase was attributable to NIA, which added staff to service the new health portfolio; the remainder of the increase was related to PAY which added staff during 2013 to service the additional clients gained during the year, and ACS that also added new employees in 2013. Professional fees, which include broker commission expenses, increased by $254,000 period over period. There was also an increase in legal expense incurred by PAY in connection with the recouping of funds related to a failure by an ACH provider in May 2013, more fully discussed in Note 9 –Commitments and Contingencies. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $130,000 as a result of the health and benefits portfolio acquired in December 2012, which is being amortized over a period of five years, and due to the amortization of a license acquired at PAY which was acquired in September 2012. Other general and administrative expense increased by $304,000 period over period, and includes an increase of $182,000 for software licensing fees and other office related expenses at ACS, and increases in marketing and other expenses primarily at NIA and PAY during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Corporate activities


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Management fees – related party	$	249		$	199		$	50			25	%
Interest income		1			1			—			—

Total revenue		250			200			50			25	%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		1,244			1,220			24			2	%
Professional fees		247			262			(15	)		(6	)%
Depreciation and amortization		40			28			12			43	%
Insurance expense – related party		78			21			57			271	%
Other general and administrative costs		488			343			145			42	%

Total expenses		2,097			1,874			223			12	%

Loss before income taxes	$	(1,847	)	$	(1,674	)	$	(173	)		(10	)%

The Corporate activities segment implements business strategy, directs marketing, provides technology oversight and guidance, coordinates and integrates activities of the other segments, contracts with alliance partners, acquires customer opportunities, and owns our proprietary NewTracker™ referral system and all other intellectual property rights. This segment includes revenue and expenses not allocated to other segments, including interest income, Capco management fee income, and corporate operating expenses. These operating expenses consist primarily of internal and external public accounting expenses, internal and external corporate legal expenses, corporate officer salaries, sales and marketing expense and rent for the principal executive offices.

Revenue is derived primarily from management fees earned from the Capcos. Management fee revenue increased 25% to $249,000 from $199,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012. Management fees, which are eliminated upon consolidation, are expected to decline in the future as the Capcos mature and utilize their cash. If a Capco does not have current or projected cash sufficient to pay management fees, then such fees are not accrued.

Total expenses increased by $223,000, or 12%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 over the same period in 2012. Salaries and benefits increased $24,000 as a result of new staff added in the third quarter 2013 in Sales, Marketing, IT and Finance offset by a reduction in the accrued bonuses based on management’s current assessment. Depreciation and amortization increased $12,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the prior period due to the capitalization of website development costs. Insurance expense – related party, which is eliminated upon consolidation, increased in conjunction with the renewal of several of our corporate policies. Other general and administrative costs increased by 42% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared with the prior period, as a result of an $184,000 increase in marketing costs from the Company’s television ad campaign, a larger portion of which was absorbed by Corporate in the current period compared with the three months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was partially offset by $38,000 reduction in IT, office and other expenses.

Loss before income taxes increased by $173,000 due primarily to increases in other general and administrative costs and salaries and benefits expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012.


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Management fees – related party	$	647		$	646		$	1			—
Interest and other income		3			8			(5	)		(63	)%

Total revenue		650			654			(4	)		(1	)%

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		4,168			3,802			366			10	%
Professional fees		1,029			726			303			42	%
Depreciation and amortization		124			83			41			49	%
Insurance expense – related party		133			21			112			533	%
Other general and administrative costs		919			1,425			(506	)		(36	)%

Total expenses		6,373			6,057			316			5	%

Loss before income taxes	$	(5,722	)	$	(5,403	)	$	(320	)		(6	)%

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

Revenue is derived primarily from management fees earned from the Capcos. Related party management fee revenue essentially remained unchanged at $647,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Related party management fees, which are eliminated upon consolidation, are expected to continue to decline in the future as the Capcos mature and utilize their cash. If a Capco does not have current or projected cash sufficient to pay management fees, then such fees are not accrued.

Total expenses increased $316,000, or 5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from the same period in 2012. Salaries and benefits increased by $366,000, due to the addition of new staff in sales, executive, IT and the human resources departments, offset by a reduction in the accrued bonuses based on management’s current assessment. Professional fees increased by $303,000 due primarily to audit and legal fees incurred in connection with the restatement of the 2011 and 2012 financial statements. The $41,000 increase in depreciation and amortization was related to the capitalization of website development costs, and insurance expense – related party increased in conjunction with the renewal of several of our corporate policies. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in other general and administrative costs that included a $244,000 reversal of an accrual for a contract dispute that was settled during the quarter, as well as a $262,000 reduction in IT, rent and other office related expense.

Loss before income taxes increased $320,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to the increases in salaries and benefits, professional fees and related party insurance expense.

Capcos


	Three months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Income from tax credits	$	31		$	122		$	(91	)		(75	)%
Interest income		2			3			(1	)		(33	)%
Other income		9			—			9			100	%

Total revenue		42			125			(83	)		(66	)%


Net change in fair value of:
Credits in lieu of cash and Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash		—			(20	)		20			(100	)%


Expenses:
Management fees – related party		249			199			50			25	%
Interest expense		41			112			(71	)		(63	)%
Professional fees		98			134			(36	)		(27	)%
Other general and administrative costs		31			46			(15	)		(33	)%

Total expenses		419			491			(72	)		(15	)%

Loss before income taxes	$	(377	)	$	(386	)	$	9			2	%

As described in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited), effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted fair value accounting for its financial assets and financial liabilities concurrent with its election of the fair value option for substantially all credits in lieu of cash, notes payable in credits in lieu of cash and prepaid insurance. These are the financial assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s Capco notes that are reported within the Company’s Capco segment. The table above reflects the effects of the adoption of fair value measurement on the income and expense items (income from tax credits, interest expense and insurance expense) related to the revalued financial assets and liability for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. In addition, the net change to the revalued financial assets and liability for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is reported in the line “Net change in fair value of Credits in lieu of cash and Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash” on the condensed consolidated statements of income (unaudited).

The Company does not anticipate creating any new Capcos in the foreseeable future and the Capco segment will continue to incur losses going forward. The Capcos will continue to earn cash investment income on their cash balances and incur cash management fees and operating expenses. The amount of cash available for investment and to pay management fees will be primarily dependent upon future returns generated from investments in qualified businesses. Income from tax credits will consist solely of accretion of the discounted value of the declining dollar amount of tax credits the Capcos will receive in the future; the Capcos will continue to incur non-cash interest expense related to the tax credits.

Revenue is derived primarily from non-cash income from tax credits. The $83,000 decrease in total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 versus the same period in 2012 reflects the effect of the declining dollar amount of tax credits remaining in 2013. The amount of future income from tax credits revenue will fluctuate with future interest rates. However, over future periods through 2016, the amount of tax credits, and therefore income the Company will recognize, will decrease to zero.

Expenses consist primarily of management fees and non-cash interest expense. While related party management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $50,000 as compared with the year ago period due to available cash in several of the Capcos, management fees, which are eliminated upon consolidation, are expected to decline in the future as the Capcos mature and utilize their cash. Interest expense decreased by $71,000, or 63%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the year ago quarter as a result of the declining amount of notes payable in 2013. Other general and administrative costs decreased from the year ago period primarily as a result of a reduction in rent expense and also a decrease in annual fees assessed by state authorities.

Overall, the pretax loss before income taxes in the Capco segment decreased by $9,000, period over period, primarily due to the reduced income from tax credits and the increase in interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013.


	Nine months ended September 30:
(In thousands):	2013			2012			$ Change			% Change
Revenue:
Income from tax credits	$	86		$	441		$	(355	)		(80	)%
Interest income		24			19			5			26	%
Other income		21			121			(100	)		(83	)%

Total revenue		131			581			(450	)		(77	)%


Net change in fair value of:
Credits in lieu of cash and Notes payable in credits in lieu of cash		26			21			5			24	%


Expenses:
Management fees – related party		647			939			(292	)		(31	)%
Interest		143			493			(350	)		(71	)%
Professional fees		214			272			(58	)		(21	)%
Other general and administrative costs		111			91			20			22	%

Total expenses		1,115			1,795			(680	)		(38	)%

Loss before income taxes	$	(958	)	$	(1,193	)	$	235			20	%

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

Revenue is derived primarily from non-cash income from tax credits. The decrease in total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 versus the same period in 2012 reflects the effect of the declining dollar amount of tax credits remaining in 2013, and the decrease in other income is related to a $100,000 gain on the sale of an investment with a zero carrying basis in the prior period. The amount of future income from tax credits revenue will fluctuate with future interest rates. However, over future periods through 2016, the amount of tax credits, and therefore the income the Company will recognize, will decrease to zero.

Expenses consist primarily of management fees and non-cash interest expense. Related party management fees decreased by $292,000, or 31%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period ended 2012. Related party management fees, which are eliminated upon consolidation, are expected to decline in the future as the Capcos mature and utilize their cash. Interest expense decreased by $350,000, or 71%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $493,000 as a result of the declining dollar amount of tax credits payable in 2012. Other general and administrative costs increased from the year ago period due primarily to a $21,000 increase in filing and other fees assessed by the state authorities, and the reversal of accrued other expenses in the year ago period.

The decrease in management fees and interest expense offset the reduction in income from tax credits improving the overall segment loss before income taxes by $235,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the year ago period.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. A discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies, and the related estimates, are included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Position in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash requirements and liquidity needs over the next twelve months are anticipated to be funded primarily through cash generated from operations, available cash and cash equivalents, existing credit lines and securitizations of the Company’s SBA lender’s unguaranteed loan portions. As more fully described below, the Company’s SBA lender will require additional funding sources to maintain SBA loan originations in the latter part of 2013 under anticipated conditions; although the failure to find these sources may require the reduction in the Company’s SBA lending and related operations, it will not impair the Company’s overall ability to operate.

The Company’s SBA lender depends on the continuation of the SBA 7(a) guaranteed loan program of the United States Government. The Company’s SBA lender depends on the availability of purchasers for SBA loans for sale in the secondary market and the premium earned therein to support its lending operations. At this time, the secondary market for the SBA loans is robust.

The Company’s SBA lender has historically financed the operations of its lending business through loans or credit facilities from various lenders and will need to continue to do so in the future. Such lenders invariably require a security interest in the SBA loans as collateral which, under the applicable law, requires the prior approval of the SBA. If the Company should ever be unable to obtain the approval for its financing arrangements from the SBA, it would likely be unable to continue to make loans.

As an alternative to holding indefinitely the portions of SBA loans remaining after sale of the guaranteed portions in the SBA supervised secondary market, the Company has undertaken to securitize these unguaranteed portions. In December 2010, the first such securitization trust established by the Company issued to one investor notes in the amount of $16,000,000 which received a Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) rating of “AA.” A second securitization, an amendment to the original transaction, was completed in December 2011, and resulted in an additional $14,900,000 of notes issued to the same investor. A third securitization was completed in March 2013 for $20,909,000 of notes issued to multiple investors, which received an “A” rating from S&P. The SBA lender used the cash generated from the first transaction to retire its outstanding term loan from Capital One, N.A. and to fund a $3,000,000 account which during the first quarter of 2011 purchased unguaranteed portions originated subsequent to the securitization transaction. Similarly, the proceeds from the second and third securitizations in 2011 and 2013 were used to pay down its outstanding revolver loan with Capital One, N.A., and to fund a $5,000,000 and $4,175,000 prefunding account, respectively, which were used to purchase unguaranteed portions of loans in the first quarter of 2012 and April 2013, respectively. While this securitization process can provide a long-term funding source for the SBA lender, there is no certainty that it can be conducted on an economic basis. In addition, the securitization mechanism itself does not provide liquidity in the short-term for funding SBA loans.

In December 2010, the SBA lender entered into a revolving loan agreement with Capital One, N.A. for up to $12,000,000 to be used to fund the guaranteed portions of SBA loans and to be repaid with the proceeds of the sale in the secondary market of those portions. Also, in June 2011, the SBA lender entered into a revolving loan agreement with Capital One N.A., for up to $15,000,000 to be used to fund the unguaranteed portions of SBA loans and to be repaid with the proceeds of loan repayments from the borrowers as well as excess cash flow of NSBF. In October 2011, the term of the loans were extended by nine months through September 30, 2013. In July 2013 the SBA lender, received an extension on the availability of its warehouse lines, totaling $27 million, with Capital One, N.A. from September 30, 2013 to May 31, 2015, at which time the outstanding balance will be converted into a three year term loan. The extension also enhanced the terms of the credit facilities by removing the $15 million funding sublimit for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans NSBF originates, and increasing the advance rate to 55% from 50% for the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA 7(a) loans.

On February 28, 2011, NBC entered into a three year line of credit of up to $10,000,000 with Sterling National Bank to purchase and warehouse receivables. In December 2012, an amendment was signed providing that upon the achievement of certain profitability levels, the maximum amount of the line of credit under the Agreement can be increased from $10,000,000 to $15,000,000 at a later date upon NBC’s request. The Amendment also extended the maturity date from February 28, 2014 to February 28, 2016. There is no cross collateralization between the Sterling lending facility and the Capital One credit facility; however, a default under the Capital One loan will create a possibility of default under the Sterling line of credit. The availability of the Sterling line of credit and the performance of the Capital One loans are subject to compliance with certain covenants and

collateral requirements as set forth in their respective agreements, as well as limited restrictions on distributions or loans to the Company by the respective debtor, none of which are material to the liquidity of the Company. At September 30, 2013, the Company and its subsidiaries were in full compliance with applicable loan covenants. The Company guarantees these loans for the subsidiaries up to the amount borrowed; in addition, the Company deposited $750,000 with Sterling to collateralize that guarantee. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had no unused sources of liquidity in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted cash of $10,399,000 as of September 30, 2013 is primarily held in Small business finance, All Other, the Capcos and Corporate segments. For Small business finance, approximately $2,672,000 is held by the securitization trusts as a reserve on future nonperforming loans, and $3,046,000 is due to participants, the SBA and others. For All other, PMT holds tax deposits for their clients until such payments are due to the respective state or federal authority, and NIA segregates premiums collected from insureds. For the Capcos, restricted cash can be used in managing and operating the Capcos, making qualified investments and for the payment of taxes on Capco income. In addition, as discussed above, the Company deposited $750,000 with Sterling to collateralize its guarantee, which is included in the Corporate segment.

In summary, Newtek generated and used cash as follows:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(In thousands)	2013			2012
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(1,257	)	$	(1,897	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(24,231	)		(15,708	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		19,020			24,708

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(6,468	)		7,103
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		14,229			11,201

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	7,761		$	18,304

Net cash used in operating activities increased by $640,000 to cash used of $(1,257,000) for the period ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used in operations of $(1,897,000) for the period ended September 30, 2012. The change primarily reflects the operation of the SBA lender, which originated $91,598,000 of SBA loans held for sale and sold $90,167,000 compared with $55,147,000 originated and $56,397,000 sold in the first nine months of 2012. In addition, cash used for prepaid expense, accrued interest receivable and other assets decreased by $(6,454,000) for the nine months is mostly related to increases in loan and FDIC receivables and capitalized loan costs recorded on the SBA lender, and additional capitalized and costs related to the potential BDC corporate restructuring and tax receivables included in the Corporate segment.

Net cash used in investing activities includes the unguaranteed portions of SBA loans, the purchase of fixed assets and customer accounts, changes in restricted cash and activities involving investments in qualified businesses. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $(8,523,000) to cash used of $(24,231,000) for the period ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used of $(15,708,000) for the period ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was due primarily to a greater amount of SBA loans originated for investment of $(28,405,000) for the nine month period in 2013 compared with $(17,105,000) in 2012. This use of cash was partially offset by increases in investments and the return of investments in qualified businesses, which provided a combined $3,082,000 of cash in 2013 versus a $(1,550,000) cash use in the same period of 2012.

Net cash provided by financing activities primarily includes the net borrowings and (repayments) on bank lines of credit and notes payable as well as securitization activities. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $5,688,000 to cash provided of $19,020,000 for the period ended September 30, 2013 from cash provided of $24,708,000 for the period ended September 30, 2012. While the current period included a cash provision of $20,909,000 related to the Company’s March 2013 securitization transaction, additional cash was used to repay bank lines of credit, a decrease of $(8,534,000) compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as well as the change in restricted cash which decreased by $(5,662,000). In addition, cash proceeds of $10,000,000 from a term loan, and an additional $2,763,000 resulting from the consolidation of Exponential of New York, LLC, an affiliated Capco company, were provided during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We consider the principal types of risk in our business activities to be fluctuations in interest rates and loan portfolio valuations and the availability of the secondary market for our SBA loans held for sale. Risk management systems and procedures are designed to identify and analyze our risks, to set appropriate policies and limits and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and information systems and other policies and programs.

Our SBA lender primarily lends at an interest rate of prime, which resets on a quarterly basis, plus a fixed margin. Our receivable financing business purchases receivables priced to equate to a similar prime plus a fixed margin structure. The Capital One term loan and revolver loan, the securitization notes and the Sterling line of credit are on a prime plus a fixed factor basis. As a result, the Company believes it has matched its cost of funds to its interest income in its financing activities. However, because of the differential between the amount lent and the smaller amount financed a significant change in market interest rates will have a material effect on our operating income. In a rising interest rate climate, our cost of funds will increase at a slower rate than the interest income earned on the loans we have made; however, this benefit may be offset by a reduction in premium income. A rise in interest rates may cause an increase in prepayments, thus decreasing the future cash flows of a loan and impacting the premium price paid in the secondary market. Conversely, in a decreasing rate environment, the Company may experience a reduction in interest rate spread; that is, interest income will decline more quickly than interest expense resulting in a net reduction of benefit to operating income, offset by an increase in premium income.

Our lender depends on the availability of secondary market purchasers for the guaranteed portions of SBA loans and the premium received on such sales to support its lending operations. At this time the secondary market for the guaranteed portions of SBA loans is robust but during the 2008 and 2009 financial crisis the Company had difficulty selling it loans for a premium; although not expected at this time, if such conditions did recur our SBA lender would most likely cease making new loans and could experience a substantial reduction in profitability.

We do not have significant exposure to changing interest rates on invested cash which was approximately $18,160,000 at September 30, 2013. We do not purchase or hold derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. All of our transactions are conducted in U.S. dollars and we do not have any foreign currency or foreign exchange risk. We do not trade commodities or have any commodity price risk.

We believe that we have placed our demand deposits, cash investments and their equivalents with high credit-quality financial institutions. Invested cash is held almost exclusively at financial institutions with ratings from S&P of A- or better. The Company invests cash not held in interest free checking accounts or bank money market accounts mainly in U.S. Treasury-only money market instruments or funds and other investment-grade securities. As of September 30, 2013, cash deposits in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance totaled approximately $3,582,000 and funds held in U.S. Treasury-only money market funds or equivalents in excess of SIPC insurance totaled approximately $1,139,000.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report and provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, Newtek’s management identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting based on criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The material weaknesses, which related to charge-back losses at Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC, (“UPS”), resulted in the restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the periods ended December 31, 2011, March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012. The full report is included in Item 9a of the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a result of the material weaknesses identified, the Company commenced a remediation plan, previously reported upon, and completed the following actions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

•

UPS hired a Chief Credit and Risk Officer with over 30 years of experience in the payments industry.

•

The Chief Operating Officer of UPS was terminated.

•

The former Controller of UPS was replaced.

•

The treasury function for UPS has been moved to the New York accounting office to improve oversight and centralize the function.

•

As part of the monthly closing process, the Controller at UPS is:

•

obtaining the month end merchant reserve account merchant balance listing and reviewing for the absence of negative balance positions and verifying that the total of such detail listing maintained by operations is in agreement with the sponsor bank’s month end balance; and

•

ensuring that all cash release transfers of merchant cash reserves amounts in excess of established thresholds have been approved by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

•

The Company completed the process of developing a new electronic cash transfer request and approval policy to establish new electronic transfer of funds policy and practices at UPS relating to the funds disbursement cycle.

•

A revised policy regarding delegation of authority for approving new merchants and boarding new accounts has been completed.

•

A weekly Credit Committee Meeting is held which reviews, discusses and approves any new merchant to be added over an established threshold.

•

A monthly review of high chargeback merchants is performed and discussed with Credit Committee.

•

A weekly meeting is held between the chargeback and risk departments to review potential excessive fraud or chargeback issues.

•

A monthly meeting is held between the credit and collections manager and the Chief Risk and Credit Officer to perform a detailed review of each account 30 days and more delinquent.

•

Additional live training discussing the Company’s Whistle Blower Hotline has been completed.

(c) Limitations.

A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the controls system’s objectives will be met. Furthermore, the design of a controls system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all

controls systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with its policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We periodically evaluate our internal controls and make changes to improve them.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) amended an existing complaint in the matter Federal Trade Commission v. WV Universal Management, LLC et al. to include Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC (“UPS”), the Company’s merchant processing subsidiary, as an additional defendant on one count. The complaint alleges that two related merchants, who were accounts of UPS, and the principals of the merchants, and the independent sales agent who brought the merchants to UPS (collectively, not including UPS, the “Merchant Defendants”), engaged in various deceptive acts and/or practices in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (collectively, the “Acts”) in connection with the merchants’ telemarketing of its debt relief and credit card interest rate reduction services. More specifically, among other charges, the complaint alleges that the Merchant Defendants improperly charged consumers for their services, misrepresented material aspects of their debt relief services to consumers and made outbound calls to persons in violation of one or more of the Acts, including to persons on the Do Not Call Registry.

In the amended complaint, the FTC added one additional count to the complaint alleging that UPS (and its former President) assisted and facilitated the Merchant Defendants’ purported violations of the Acts by providing the credit card processing services to the merchants used to collect payments from their clients for improper charges. The FTC is asserting that UPS knew or consciously avoided knowing that the Merchant Defendants were involved in deceptive telemarketing schemes. Thus, the FTC is attempting by this action to assert its enforcement authority beyond the parties committing the alleged violations to include those that provide services to the merchants even in the absence of any affiliation or actual knowledge of the improper practices.

The original complaint was filed on October 29, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, and the amended complaint was filed on June 17, 2013. The FTC is seeking various forms of injunctive and monetary relief, including an injunction to prevent future violations of the Acts by each of the defendants and the refund of monies paid and disgorgement of purportedly ill-gotten monies.

The Company does not believe that the facts or the FTC’s legal theory support the FTC’s allegations against UPS as set forth in the complaint, and the Company intends to vigorously challenge the FTC’s claims.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification by Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2		Certification by Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1		Certification by Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		NEWTEK BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

Date:	November 7, 2013	By:	/s/ Barry Sloane
			Barry Sloane
			Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
			(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	November 7, 2013	By:	/s/ Jennifer Eddelson
			Jennifer Eddelson
			Chief Accounting Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)