Edgar Filing: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

2012 Q2 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 30, 2012



¨		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From To

Commission File Number: 001-32431

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		90-0199783
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



100 Potrero Avenue San Francisco, CA		94103-4813
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(415) 558-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

On April 19, 2012 the registrant had 49,694,379 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 57,183,964 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Quarters and Fiscal Year-to-Date Periods Ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Year-to-Date Periods Ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	33

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	34

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	34

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	49

Item 6.	Exhibits	50

Signatures		51

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
ASSETS	(unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	551,512	$	747,988
Short-term investments	391,281		350,735
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,466 at September 30, 2011 and $2,098 at March 30, 2012	61,815		57,762
Inventories	26,244		16,562
Deferred taxes	90,869		94,859
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	36,877		26,099
Total current assets	1,158,598		1,294,005
Long-term investments	272,797		209,804
Property, plant and equipment, net	117,107		135,517
Intangible assets, net	51,573		44,816
Goodwill	263,260		264,750
Deferred taxes	14,779		20,337
Other non-current assets	6,273		16,171
Total assets	$	1,884,387	$	1,985,400
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	10,887	$	5,444
Accrued liabilities	117,035		108,245
Income taxes payable	4,762		9,391
Deferred revenue	26,701		26,718
Total current liabilities	159,385		149,798
Long-term deferred revenue	15,526		16,332
Deferred taxes	671		658
Other non-current liabilities	23,455		31,445
Total liabilities	199,037		198,233
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, one vote per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 51,860,546 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 50,284,419 at March 30, 2012	52		50
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value, ten votes per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 57,559,554 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 57,183,964 at March 30, 2012	58		57
Additional paid-in capital	210,681		149,082
Retained earnings	1,445,189		1,606,468
Accumulated other comprehensive income	7,533		9,130
Total stockholders’ equity – Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	1,663,513		1,764,787
Controlling interest	21,837		22,380
Total stockholders’ equity	1,685,350		1,787,167
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,884,387	$	1,985,400

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
Revenue:	(unaudited)
Licensing	$	214,627		$	225,349		$	402,803		$	424,973
Products	26,347			27,228			72,374			53,628
Services	9,052			7,682			17,561			15,036
Total revenue	250,026			260,259			492,738			493,637
Cost of revenue:
Cost of licensing	5,771			3,303			9,732			6,631
Cost of products	20,031			17,635			42,229			31,523
Cost of services	2,655			2,654			5,635			5,848
Total cost of revenue	28,457			23,592			57,596			44,002
Gross margin	221,569			236,667			435,142			449,635
Operating expenses:
Research and development	28,399			34,236			56,726			67,062
Sales and marketing	37,545			43,194			75,762			86,210
General and administrative	35,155			37,281			72,197			72,746
Restructuring charges, net	—			910			785			1,278
Total operating expenses	101,099			115,621			205,470			227,296
Operating income	120,470			121,046			229,672			222,339
Interest income	1,953			1,414			3,567			3,151
Interest expense	(85		)	(5		)	(368		)	(31		)
Other income, net	156			60			689			260
Income before provision for income taxes	122,494			122,515			233,560			225,719
Provision for income taxes	(40,012		)	(34,198		)	(64,313		)	(64,036		)
Net income including controlling interest	82,482			88,317			169,247			161,683
Less: net income attributable to controlling interest	(421		)	(197		)	(799		)	(404		)
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	82,061		$	88,120		$	168,448		$	161,279
Earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:
Basic	$	0.73		$	0.81		$	1.50		$	1.48
Diluted	$	0.72		$	0.81		$	1.48		$	1.48
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	112,140			108,415			112,086			108,650
Diluted	113,346			109,170			113,535			109,242
Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses	$	343		$	343		$	686		$	686

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)



	Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
Operating activities:	(unaudited)
Net income including controlling interest	$	169,247		$	161,683
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	21,045			20,103
Stock-based compensation	22,000			23,502
Amortization of premium on investments	7,805			9,306
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options	(11,305		)	(425		)
Provision for doubtful accounts	856			132
Deferred income taxes	(472		)	(10,030		)
Other non-cash items affecting net income	157			2,237
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(20,218		)	4,103
Inventories	(3,038		)	876
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(3,715		)	(1,128		)
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(13,379		)	(10,634		)
Income taxes, net	620			14,108
Deferred revenue	1,988			836
Net cash provided by operating activities	171,591			214,669
Investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(368,007		)	(122,249		)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities	115,462			105,454
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities	122,914			111,515
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(19,551		)	(30,450		)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(3,350		)	(575		)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale	2,797			715
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities	(149,735		)	64,410
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of shares withheld for taxes	15,215			3,524
Repurchase of common stock	(75,124		)	(86,149		)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options	11,305			425
Net cash used in financing activities	(48,604		)	(82,200		)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	1,155			(403		)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(25,593		)	196,476
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	545,861			551,512
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	520,268		$	747,988
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	64,019		$	59,997
Cash paid for interest	205			4

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”), and with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations, which allow for certain information and footnote disclosures that are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP to be condensed or omitted. In our opinion, these condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and include all adjustments necessary for fair presentation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, filed with the SEC.

The results for the fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarterly or annual financial period, including the fiscal year ending September 28, 2012.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolby Laboratories and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, we have consolidated the financial results of jointly owned affiliated companies in which our principal stockholder has a controlling interest. We report these controlling interests as a separate line item in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as net income attributable to controlling interest and in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as controlling interest. We eliminate all intercompany accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include estimated selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element revenue arrangements, valuation allowances for accounts receivable, carrying values of inventories and certain property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair values of investments, accrued expenses, including liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Friday in September. The fiscal periods presented herein include the 13 week periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, and the 27 week period ended April 1, 2011 and the 26 week period ended March 30, 2012. Our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (fiscal 2011) consisted of 53 weeks, while our fiscal year ending September 28, 2012 (fiscal 2012) consists of 52 weeks.

Reclassifications

We have reclassified certain prior period amounts within our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to conform to our current period presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenue, operating income, or net income.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, (“ASU 2011-05”). This new accounting standard: (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income, and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. This new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income, nor does it affect

Table of Contents

how earnings per share is calculated or presented. ASU 2011-05 is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. In December 2011 the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update temporarily defers the effective date of the requirement for presentation of reclassification adjustments, as described above. ASU 2011-05 is expected to be effective for our fiscal year beginning September 29, 2012. As this new standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not impact our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011 the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, (“ASU 2011-08”). This new accounting standard simplifies goodwill impairment tests and states that a qualitative assessment may be performed to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We intend to adopt the provisions of this accounting standard for the goodwill impairment test that will be performed in third quarter of fiscal 2012. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-08 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies as compared to those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

3. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash	$	394,474	$	483,622
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	142,038		264,366
U.S. agency securities	15,000		—
Total cash and cash equivalents	551,512		747,988
Short-term investments:
Commercial paper	—		20,984
Corporate bonds	52,645		49,885
Municipal debt securities	330,562		274,853
U.S. agency securities	8,074		5,013
Total short-term investments	391,281		350,735
Long-term investments:
Corporate bonds	124,313		75,207
Municipal debt securities	141,639		114,518
U.S. agency securities	6,845		20,079
Total long-term investments	272,797		209,804
Total cash, cash equivalents, and investments	$	1,215,590	$	1,308,527

Our investment portfolio, which is recorded as cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments, consists of the following:



	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Money market funds	$	142,038	$	—	$	—		$	142,038
U.S. agency securities	29,858		65		(4		)	29,919
Corporate bonds	177,129		316		(487		)	176,958
Municipal debt securities	471,005		1,251		(55		)	472,201
Cash equivalents and investments	$	820,030	$	1,632	$	(546	)	$	821,116

Table of Contents



	March 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Money market funds	$	264,366	$	—	$	—		$	264,366
U.S. agency securities	25,054		38		—			25,092
Commercial paper	20,984		—		—			20,984
Corporate bonds	124,540		565		(13		)	125,092
Municipal debt securities	388,574		840		(43		)	389,371
Cash equivalents and investments	$	823,518	$	1,443	$	(56	)	$	824,905

We have classified all of our investments listed in the tables above as available-for-sale securities recorded at fair market value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Upon sale, amounts of gains and losses reclassified into earnings are determined based on specific identification of the securities sold.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position:



	September 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	3,997	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,997	$	(4	)
Corporate bonds	87,613		(487		)	—		—			87,613		(487		)
Municipal debt securities	79,466		(52		)	2,081		(3		)	81,547		(55		)
Total	$	171,076	$	(543	)	$	2,081	$	(3	)	$	173,157	$	(546	)



	March 30, 2012
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	15,642	$	(13	)	$	—	$	—	$	15,642	$	(13	)
Municipal debt securities	57,054		(43		)	—		—		57,054		(43		)
Total	$	72,696	$	(56	)	$	—	$	—	$	72,696	$	(56	)

The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. As of March 30, 2012, we owned 29 securities that were in an unrealized loss position. We do not intend to sell, nor do we believe we will need to sell, these securities before we recover the associated unrealized losses. We do not consider any portion of the unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 or March 30, 2012 to be an other-than-temporary impairment, nor do we consider any of the unrealized losses to be credit losses.

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments based on stated maturities:

Table of Contents



	March 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	350,250	$	350,735
Due in 1 to 2 years	193,322		194,147
Due in 2 to 3 years	15,580		15,657
Total	$	559,152	$	560,539

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	10,821	$	5,535
Work in process	2,942		—
Finished goods	12,481		11,027
Inventories	$	26,244	$	16,562

The primary driver of the decrease in inventories from September 30, 2011 to March 30, 2012 is an effort to reduce overall inventory levels in connection with the restructuring of our manufacturing operations and to match anticipated demand for products.

Additionally, $8.8 million of raw materials inventory is included within other non-current assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 30, 2012. This inventory was purchased in bulk in fiscal 2012 to obtain a significant volume discount, and is expected to be consumed over a period that exceeds 12 months. We have reviewed anticipated consumption rates of this inventory and do not believe there to be material risk of obsolescence prior to the ultimate sale of the inventory. As a result no reserve has been recorded as of March 30, 2012. All inventory was classified as current as of September 30, 2011.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Prepaid assets	$	9,365	$	8,373
Other current assets	19,683		15,297
Income tax receivable	7,829		2,429
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	36,877	$	26,099

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following:

Table of Contents



	September 30, 2011			March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Land	$	12,778		$	12,844
Buildings	26,623			26,804
Leasehold improvements	44,021			59,242
Machinery and equipment	20,845			24,131
Computer systems and software	71,220			80,882
Furniture and fixtures	10,537			12,408
Products provided under operating leases	1,060			—
	187,084			216,311
Less: accumulated depreciation	(69,977		)	(80,794		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	117,107		$	135,517

Depreciation expense for our property, plant and equipment is included in cost of products, cost of services, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following table outlines changes to the carrying amount of goodwill:




	(in thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	263,260
Acquired goodwill	—
Translation adjustments	1,490
Balance at March 30, 2012	$	264,750

Intangible assets consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011							March 30, 2012
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Intangible assets subject to amortization:	(in thousands)
Acquired patents and technology	$	61,611	$	(32,146	)	$	29,465	$	61,570	$	(36,251	)	$	25,319
Customer relationships	30,748		(12,821		)	17,927		30,748		(14,409		)	16,339
Customer contracts	6,063		(6,063		)	—		—		—			—
Other intangibles	20,308		(16,127		)	4,181		20,308		(17,150		)	3,158
Total	$	118,730	$	(67,157	)	$	51,573	$	112,626	$	(67,810	)	$	44,816

Amortization expense for our intangible assets is included in cost of licensing, cost of products, research and development expenses, and sales and marketing expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As of March 30, 2012, our expected amortization expense in future periods is as follows:



Fiscal Year	Amortization Expense
	(in thousands)
Remainder of 2012	$	5,968
2013	11,923
2014	10,279
2015	7,823
2016	5,654
Thereafter	3,169
Total	$	44,816

Table of Contents

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Amounts payable to joint licensing program partners	$	42,502	$	42,350
Accrued compensation and benefits	41,168		35,796
Accrued customer refunds and deposits	10,849		11,011
Accrued professional fees	5,727		4,324
Other accrued liabilities	16,789		14,764
Accrued liabilities	$	117,035	$	108,245

Other Non-Current Liabilities

Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Supplemental retirement plan obligations	$	1,811	$	2,039
Non-current tax liabilities	13,070		19,499
Other liabilities	8,574		9,907
Other non-current liabilities	$	23,455	$	31,445

See Note 7 “Income Taxes” for additional information related to tax liabilities.

Revenue from Material Customer

In the fiscal quarters ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, revenue from one customer was $37.8 million and $37.4 million, respectively, or 15% and 14% of revenue for each quarter, respectively. In the fiscal year-to-date periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, the same customer accounted for $66.3 million and $69.2 million, respectively, or 13% and 14% of total revenue, respectively.

4. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We minimize the use of unobservable inputs and use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. We classify our inputs to measure fair value using the following three-level hierarchy:


Level 1:	Quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities.


Level 2:	Prices may be based upon quoted prices in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets but are corroborated by market data.


Level 3:	Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available and reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified below:

Table of Contents



	September 30, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Money market funds (2)	142,038		—		—		142,038
Corporate bonds (3)	—		176,958		—		176,958
Municipal debt securities (3)	—		472,201		—		472,201
U.S. agency securities (2), (3)	29,919		—		—		29,919
Total	$	173,848	$	649,159	$	—	$	823,007


(1)	These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.


(2)	These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.


(3)	These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.



	September 30, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Total	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891


(1)	These liabilities are included within accrued compensation and benefits and within other non-current liabilities.



	March 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,137	$	—	$	—	$	2,137
Money market funds (2)	264,366		—		—		264,366
Commercial paper (3)	—		20,984		—		20,984
Corporate bonds (4)	—		125,092		—		125,092
Municipal debt securities (4)	—		389,371		—		389,371
U.S. agency securities (4)	25,092		—		—		25,092
Total	$	291,595	$	535,447	$	—	$	827,042


(1)	These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.


(2)	These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.


(3)	These assets are included within short-term investments.


(4)	These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.



	March 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,137	$	—	$	—	$	2,137
Total	$	2,137	$	—	$	—	$	2,137


(1)	These liabilities are included within accrued compensation and benefits and within other non-current liabilities.

We base the fair value of our Level 1 financial instruments, which are traded in active markets, using quoted market prices for identical instruments. Our Level 1 financial instruments include money market funds, U.S. agency securities, U.S. government bonds, and mutual fund investments held in our supplemental retirement plan.

We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from a professional pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments, or model driven valuations using observable market data or inputs corroborated by observable market data.

To validate the fair value determination provided by our primary pricing service, we perform quality controls over values received which include comparing our pricing service provider’s assessment of the fair values of our investment securities against the fair values of our investment securities obtained from another independent source, reviewing the pricing movement in the context of overall market trends, and reviewing trading information from our investment managers. In addition, we

Table of Contents

assess the inputs and methods used in determining the fair value in order to determine the classification of securities in the fair value hierarchy.

We did not own any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of September 30, 2011 or March 30, 2012.

5. Stock-Based Compensation

We have adopted compensation plans that provide for grants of stock-based awards as a form of compensation to employees, officers, and directors. We have issued stock-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”).

We recognize stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. Stock-based compensation expense included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations was as follows:



	Fiscal Quarter Ended					Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012		April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense:
Stock options	$	6,130		$	5,995	$	13,027		$	12,054
Restricted stock units	4,595			5,880		8,721			11,144
Employee stock purchase plan	184			144		366			225
Stock appreciation rights	(169		)	44		(114		)	79
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	10,740		$	12,063	$	22,000		$	23,502



	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012		April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense was classified as follows:
Cost of products	$	168	$	179	$	314	$	345
Cost of services	44		61		82		117
Research and development	2,611		2,968		4,934		5,632
Sales and marketing	3,367		4,004		6,363		7,719
General and administrative	4,550		4,851		10,307		9,689
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	10,740	$	12,063	$	22,000	$	23,502

As of March 30, 2012, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense associated with employee stock options expected to vest was $61.5 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.79 years. As of March 30, 2012, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense associated with restricted stock units expected to vest was $57.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.08 years.

The following table summarizes information about stock options issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan:



	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)				(in years)	(in thousands)
Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2011	5,801		$	45.19
Grants	2,086		31.55
Exercises	(181	)	24.34
Forfeitures and cancellations	(269	)	51.49
Stock options outstanding at March 30, 2012	7,437		$	41.64	7.8	$	34,766
Stock options vested at March 30, 2012 and expected to vest	7,143		$	41.61	7.7	$	33,732
Stock options exercisable at March 30, 2012	3,355		$	40.27	6.3	$	19,438

Table of Contents

Aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of our common stock on March 30, 2012 of $38.06 and excludes the impact of stock options that were not in-the-money.

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of grant. The fair value of our stock-based awards was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012		April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012
Expected life (in years)	4.40		4.53		4.40		4.53
Risk-free interest rate	1.6	%	0.7	%	1.5	%	0.7	%
Expected stock price volatility	41.2	%	43.5	%	41.5	%	44.4	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—		—

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2005 Stock Plan:



	Shares		Weighted Average Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Non-vested at September 30, 2011	946		$	53.71
Granted	1,082		32.08
Vested	(336	)	51.44
Forfeitures and cancellations	(47	)	48.00
Non-vested at March 30, 2012	1,645		$	40.11

Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In January 2005, our board of directors adopted and our stockholders approved our ESPP, which allows eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than 1,000 shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The plan provides for a discount equal to 15 percent of the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the last day of the purchase period.

Amended Employee Stock Purchase Plan. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the compensation committee of our board of directors approved an amendment to the ESPP to provide for overlapping one-year offering periods composed of successive six-month purchase periods, with a look back feature to the Company’s stock price at the commencement of a one-year offering period. The amended plan also includes an automatic reset feature that provides for an offering period to be reset and recommenced to a new lower-priced offering if the offering price of a new offering period is less than that of the immediately preceding offering period. The amendment is effective for the ESPP offering period commencing in May 2012. We do not expect adoption of the amendment to the ESPP to have a material impact on our results of operations.

6. Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we informed approximately 55 employees of our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our business under a strategic restructuring program. As a result we recognized total estimated severance and other associated costs for affected employees of $2.5 million and $0.4 million in fiscal 2011 and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. In addition, we recognized $0.4 million in facilities and contract termination costs during the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We also recognized $0.2 million and $0.4 million in fixed asset write-off costs related to this restructuring program in fiscal 2011 and during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, respectively. We expect to recognize an additional $0.2 million in other associated costs during the remainder of fiscal 2012. These expenses are being recognized in restructuring charges, net, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Changes in our restructuring accruals, which are included within accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, were as follows:

Table of Contents



	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs		Fixed assets write-off			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2,250		$	—	$	—		$	120		$	2,370
Restructuring charges	318			432		424			104			1,278
Cash payments	(2,435		)	—		—			(185		)	(2,620		)
Non-cash charges	5			93		(424		)	—			(326		)
Balance at March 30, 2012	$	138		$	525	$	—		$	39		$	702

7. Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is based on a projection of our annual fiscal year results. Our effective tax rate was 33% and 28% for the fiscal quarters ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, respectively, and 28% and 28% for the fiscal year-to-date periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, respectively.

Our estimated fiscal year 2012 tax provision reflects additional benefits from our election to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in a foreign subsidiary. We also benefited from a change in the State of California apportionment sourcing rules, which became effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. These benefits were partially offset by the expiration of the federal research and development tax credits, effective from the first quarter of fiscal 2012, which resulted in an increase to our effective tax rate.

In the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011, we completed the restructuring of our international operations, which resulted in the release of a deferred tax liability of $11.0 million related to the amortization of an intangible asset from a prior year acquisition, thereby lowering our effective tax rate for that period.

As of March 30, 2012, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $14.4 million, of which $8.1 million, if recognized, would reduce our effective tax rate. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified within non-current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Withholding Tax. We recognize licensing revenue gross of withholding taxes, which our licensees remit directly to their local tax authorities, and for which we receive a related foreign tax credit in our income tax provision. Withholding tax remittances were $7.6 million and $10.2 million in the fiscal quarters ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, respectively. Withholding tax remittances were $15.9 million and $21.4 million in the fiscal year-to-date periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, respectively.

8. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of these proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. However, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could materially affect our future operating results or financial condition in a particular period. There has been no material change in the status of legal proceedings since our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of March 30, 2012:



	Payments Due By Fiscal Period
	Remainder of 2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		Thereafter		Total
	(in thousands)
Operating leases (1)	$	4,378	$	10,321	$	9,279	$	7,084	$	5,912	$	10,097	$	47,071
Purchase obligations (2)	1,695		2,972		361		—		—		—		5,028
Total	$	6,073	$	13,293	$	9,640	$	7,084	$	5,912	$	10,097	$	52,099


(1)	Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space as of March 30, 2012.


(2)	Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was cancelled for any reason other than an event of default as

Table of Contents

described by the agreement.

We are party to certain contractual agreements under which we have agreed to provide indemnifications of varying scope and duration to the other party relating to our licensed intellectual property. Historically, we have made no payments for these indemnification obligations and no amounts have been accrued in our condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these obligations. Due to their varying terms and conditions, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount we could be required to pay.

10. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock Repurchase Program

In November 2009 we announced a stock repurchase program, providing for the repurchase of up to $250.0 million of our Class A common stock. Our board of directors approved an additional $300.0 million for our stock repurchase program in July 2010, $250.0 million in July 2011, and $100.0 million in February 2012, for a total authorization of up to $900.0 million in stock repurchases. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in amounts that we consider appropriate. The timing of repurchases and the number of shares repurchased depend upon a variety of factors including price, regulatory requirements, the rate of dilution from our equity compensation programs, and other market conditions. We may limit, suspend, or terminate the stock repurchase program at any time without prior notice. This program does not have a specified expiration date. Shares repurchased under the program will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock. As of March 30, 2012, the remaining authorization to purchase additional shares is $380.2 million.

Stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program during the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 is summarized as follows:



	Shares Repurchased	Cost (in thousands) (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2011	885,969	$	26,068	$	29.41
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012	1,575,891	$	60,081	$	38.11
Total	2,461,860	$	86,149


(1)	Cost of share repurchases includes the price paid per share and applicable commissions.


(2)	Excludes commission costs.

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows:



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Net income including controlling interest	$	82,482		$	88,317		$	169,247		$	161,683
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax	2,237			1,934			3,344			1,557
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	220			306			(656		)	192
Comprehensive income	84,939			90,557			171,935			163,432
Less: comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest	(555		)	(415		)	(933		)	(556		)
Comprehensive income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	84,384		$	90,142		$	171,002		$	162,876

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:



	September 30, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax of ($2,653) at September 30, 2011 and ($3,026) at March 30, 2012	$	6,834	8,239
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($387) at September 30, 2011 and ($496) at March 30, 2012	699		891
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$	7,533	9,130

Table of Contents

Stockholders' Equity and Controlling Interest

The following tables present the changes in total stockholders’ equity attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and the controlling interest:



	Dolby Laboratories, Inc.			Controlling Interest		Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	1,473,737		$	20,942	$	1,494,679
Net income	168,448			799		169,247
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of ($301)	3,210			134		3,344
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $406	(656		)	—		(656		)
Stock-based compensation expense	22,111			—		22,111
Repurchase of common stock	(75,124		)	—		(75,124		)
Tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units	11,320			—		11,320
Common stock issued under employee stock plans, net of shares withheld for taxes	15,215			—		15,215
Balance at April 1, 2011	$	1,618,261		$	21,875	$	1,640,136



	Dolby Laboratories, Inc.			Controlling Interest			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	1,663,513		$	21,837		$	1,685,350
Net income	161,279			404			161,683
Distributions to controlling interest	—			(13		)	(13		)
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of ($373)	1,405			152			1,557
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of ($109)	192			—			192
Stock-based compensation expense	23,536			—			23,536
Repurchase of common stock	(86,149		)	—			(86,149		)
Tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units	(2,513		)	—			(2,513		)
Common stock issued under employee stock plans, net of shares withheld for taxes	3,524			—			3,524
Balance at March 30, 2012	$	1,764,787		$	22,380		$	1,787,167

11. Earnings Per Share

We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the weighted-average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, we divide net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of dilutive shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

Table of Contents



	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012		April 1, 2011		March 30, 2012
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	82,061	$	88,120	$	168,448	$	161,279
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic	112,140		108,415		112,086		108,650
Potential common shares from options to purchase Class A and Class B common stock	1,015		521		1,206		445
Potential common shares from restricted stock units	191		234		243		147
Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted	113,346		109,170		113,535		109,242
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. - basic	$	0.73	$	0.81	$	1.50	$	1.48
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. - diluted	$	0.72	$	0.81	$	1.48	$	1.48
Anti-dilutive options excluded from calculation	2,836		5,830		2,855		6,250
Anti-dilutive restricted stock units excluded from calculation	426		439		431		1,592

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These discussions contain forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations, which involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: statements regarding the extent and timing of future licensing, products, and services revenue levels and mix, expenses, margins, net income per diluted share, income taxes, tax benefits, acquisition costs and related amortization, and other elements of results of operations; our expectations regarding demand and acceptance for our technologies; growth opportunities and trends in the markets in which we operate; our plans, strategies, and expected opportunities; the deployment of and demand for our products and for products incorporating our technologies; and future competition. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including the risks set forth in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and elsewhere in this filing. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to conform our prior statements to new developments or actual results.

Overview

Dolby Laboratories has participated in the entertainment industry for more than 45 years. We provide products, services, and technologies to capture, distribute, and play back entertainment content that gives consumers a premium entertainment experience, regardless of how or where they choose to enjoy it. Our core strengths range from our expertise in digital signal processing and compression technology to our long history of providing products, tools, and technologies to participants in the entertainment industry at each stage in the content creation, distribution, and playback process. We provide products and services that enable content creators and distributors to produce, encode, and transmit content with our premium audio technologies, and we license decoding technologies to the manufacturers of entertainment devices to ensure that content is ultimately experienced as the creator and distributor intended.

Throughout our history, we have introduced numerous innovations that have significantly improved the quality of audio entertainment, such as noise reduction for the recording and cinema industries and surround sound for cinema and home entertainment. Today, we continue to derive the vast majority of our revenue from our audio technologies.

Looking forward, we see a number of industry trends that create opportunities for the continued growth of our audio business, including the ongoing global transition from analog to digital television and consumers’ increasing use of portable electronic devices, such as tablets and smartphones, to play back digital content. Our portfolio of technologies and solutions optimize the audio experience for portable devices to provide consumers with a rich, clear, and immersive sound, despite the bandwidth limitations of online and cellular networks.

We also see opportunities to apply our core strengths in areas beyond audio. For example, we believe that significant improvements can be made in the technology currently used to deliver and play back premium video, and we have identified solutions that may substantially improve the video experience. Similarly, we believe we can apply our existing audio technologies to improve the clarity and quality of voice communications in areas such as multi-party teleconferencing.

Business Model

We generate the majority of our revenue by licensing technologies to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) of consumer entertainment (“CE”) products and to software vendors. We also generate revenue by selling products and related services to creators and distributors of entertainment content.

We participate in the global entertainment industry in three principal ways:


•	We offer products, services, and technologies to creators and distributors of entertainment content, such as motion picture, television, and music recording studios, television broadcasters, satellite and cable operators, and increasingly, Internet content streaming and download service providers. These content creators and distributors use our products,

Table of Contents

services, and technologies to encode and transmit content, creating rich, clear, and immersive audio experiences for consumers upon playback.


•	We license technologies, such as Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Dolby Pulse, to OEMs and software vendors for incorporation into their CE and other products, so that consumers can play back audio content with our technologies in the rich, clear, and immersive manner the creators intended.


•	We work directly with standards-setting organizations in the entertainment and technology industries, as well as governments and other regulatory bodies, to promote adoption of our technologies in their standards. As a result our technologies are included in virtually all DVD players, Blu-ray Disc players, audio/video receivers, and personal computer (“PC”) DVD software players.

We license our technologies to OEMs and software vendors in 46 countries, and our licensees distribute products incorporating our technologies throughout the world. We sell our products and provide services in approximately 80 countries. In fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, revenue from outside of the U.S. was 66%, 68%, and 68% of our total revenue, respectively. Geographic data for our licensing revenue is based on the location of our licensees’ headquarters. Products revenue is based on the destination to which we ship our products, while services revenue is based on the location where services are performed.

Opportunities, Challenges, and Risks

Our licensing and products markets are characterized by rapid technological changes, new and improved product introductions, changing customer demands, evolving industry standards, changing licensee needs, and product obsolescence. As described below, our licensing revenue is subject to uncertainties and trends relating to technology and market growth, as well as the mix of CE products sold that incorporate our technologies. Our licensing business also could be affected by adverse general economic conditions, because many of the products in which our technologies are incorporated are discretionary goods. Furthermore, our products business is subject to intense competition and uncertainties relating to the transition to 3D cinema and purchasing decisions by our cinema customers. Our product revenue is likely to continue to be materially affected if demand for our 3D products does not improve.

Licensing

Licensing revenue constitutes the majority of our total revenue, representing 77%, 83%, and 86% of total revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively.

As consumers are presented with more options for receiving content, competition across delivery channels has intensified. We see this reflected in the composition of our licensing revenue, as driven by a shift away from optical disc based products. Optical disc based revenue is generated from the sale of technology solutions that enable DVD or Blu-ray Disc playback functionality. Optical disc based revenue includes the Windows 7 operating system, independent PC DVD software players, DVD, and Blu-ray Disc technologies included in consumer products. However, most of these products can receive content over mobile or online networks, as well as from optical discs, and we have increased our technology penetration into these other distribution channels. Non-optical disc based revenue is generated from the sale of technology solutions other than those used to enable DVD or Blu-ray Disc playback functionality. Non-optical disc based revenue includes licensing revenue derived from products such as TVs, set-top boxes, and mobile phones, as well as our post processing technologies on a range of devices. We remain focused on delivering the products, tools, and technologies needed to ensure a high quality audio experience from any device.

Looking forward, we expect continued growth in the proportion of our licensing revenue we derive from non-optical disc sources. This will be driven partly by the maturity of optical disc as a method for delivering content, but also by the significant opportunities presented by digital broadcast and online distribution, as well as the inclusion of our technologies in the Windows 8 operating system to enable the playback of online content. We also see significant opportunities to offer encode/decode solutions in video and voice that leverage our expertise in signal processing, compression, and the capture and playback of content.

Our licensing revenue comes from the following markets and primarily from the inclusion of our technologies in the products indicated for each market:


•	Broadcast market: primarily televisions and set-top boxes


•	PC market: primarily DVD software players and Microsoft Windows operating systems


•	CE market: primarily DVD and Blu-ray Disc players and recorders, audio/video receivers, and home-theater-in-a-box systems


•	Other markets:


◦	Mobile – primarily cell phones and other mobile devices

Table of Contents


◦	Gaming – primarily video game consoles


◦	Licensing services – primarily administration of joint licensing programs


◦	Automotive – primarily in-car DVD players

The entertainment industry is in transition. The growth of the Internet, and the related shift by consumers toward online entertainment content, has resulted in a global trend toward an array of online content streaming and download services. Today content is captured, delivered, and played back in more ways than ever before. Content creators and distributors are increasingly focused on delivering content across a multitude of media and devices with varying bandwidth and performance requirements, including PCs, connected TVs, set-top boxes, gaming consoles, connected Blu-ray Disc players, and a variety of mobile devices. Many of these mobile devices are increasingly designed to capture and distribute content through improved camera and WiFi technologies, as well as to play back rich entertainment experiences. This increasingly complex array of devices, with capability for both creating and playing back content, presents a challenge for content creators and device manufacturers seeking consistent audio quality. We believe this challenge provides an opportunity similar to that of digital broadcast, whereby we can provide solutions to optimize the audio experience across the online and portable device ecosystem.

In the area of content creation and delivery, our technologies are included in DVD, Blu-ray Disc, and certain broadcast standards, and we are working to extend our technologies to online delivery services. Online content aggregators, including Netflix, Amazon, VUDU, Apple, HBO GO, Samsung’s Acetrax, and the Roxio Now platform, use our technologies to encode video and audio content. Leading music services such as Rhapsody and Omnifone use our audio encoding tools to deliver a rich music experience to their subscribers. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, HBO adopted Dolby Digital Plus in its HBO GO service, for content delivered to select connected TVs. HBO will also offer Dolby Digital Plus in its HBO GO service, for content delivered to Blu-ray Disc players. In addition, Samsung is expected to offer Dolby Digital Plus surround sound audio through their Acetrax Video on Demand application during fiscal 2012.

Our broadcast market is driven by demand for our technologies in televisions and set-top boxes and represented approximately 27%, 31%, and 33% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Higher attach rates in the first half of fiscal 2012 drove increased revenue from both televisions and set-top boxes, relative to the same period in the prior year. We view the broadcast market as an area for potential continued growth, primarily in geographic markets outside of the U.S. We also view broadcast services, such as terrestrial broadcast or IPTV services, which operate under bandwidth constraints, as another area of opportunity for Dolby Digital Plus, HE AAC, and Dolby Pulse. These technologies enable the delivery of high quality audio content at reduced bit rates, thereby conserving bandwidth. We may not, however, be able to extend our current success in the broadcast market to these new opportunities.

Our PC market represented approximately 36%, 30%, and 28% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Our technologies are incorporated in the majority of PCs sold today, primarily because of the inclusion of DVD and Blu-ray Disc playback in the majority of PCs and the inclusion of Dolby technologies in the DVD and Blu-ray Disc standards.

Historically, we have licensed our technologies to a range of PC licensees, including independent software vendors (“ISV”), PC OEMs, and operating system providers, and the release of new versions of major PC operating systems has often resulted in changes in the mix of our PC licensees. In 2007, Microsoft introduced its Windows Vista operating system, which included our technologies to enable DVD audio playback in two of its editions. In fiscal 2009, Microsoft released its current operating system, Windows 7, which includes our technologies within four editions. As a result, since 2007 the mix of our PC licensing revenue from operating systems has increased relative to that from OEMs and ISVs. We currently license our audio codec technologies directly to OEMs such as Apple, Toshiba, and Sony to support optical disc playback on PCs, and we license our PC Entertainment Experience (“PCEE”) technologies to multiple PC OEMs through our PCEE licensing program.

In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft under which Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 channel decoding and Dolby Digital two-channel encoding will be included in all PCs and tablets licensed to run the Windows 8 operating system. Under the arrangement, OEMs generally will be required to directly license and pay us a base royalty rate for the right to use the Dolby technologies included in Windows 8 installed on PCs and tablets for online and file-based content. OEMs will pay a higher per-unit royalty for Windows 8 PCs that also include optical disc playback functionality, which will be implemented by ISV applications. This higher rate is consistent with historical rates paid for the inclusion of Dolby disc playback software. We expect the majority of PCs to continue to ship with optical disc drives when Windows 8 is released and to include optical disc playback functionality.

We believe the Microsoft Windows 8 arrangement provides an easier way for OEMs to enable playback with our technologies of content delivered by online services and video in local files on the device. Given the anticipated release date of Windows 8, we do not expect any such change to have a material financial impact in fiscal 2012, as we expect that Microsoft will continue to license its Windows 7 operating systems with our technologies at least until the release of Windows 8. The

Table of Contents

ultimate financial impact of these licensing arrangements for Windows 8 on our licensing revenue is uncertain and will depend on several factors, including:


•	The extent and rate at which Windows 8 is adopted in the marketplace;


•	The extent to which OEMs include optical disc playback in Windows 8 devices;


•	The extent to which earlier versions of Microsoft operating systems, including Windows 7, continue to be licensed after the release of Windows 8;


•	Our ability to establish and extend licensing relationships directly with PC OEMs and ISVs;


•	The rate at which entertainment content shifts from optical disc media to online media, thus reducing the need for PCs to have optical disc drives and DVD and Blu-ray Disc software players; and


•	Our ability to extend the adoption of our technologies to online and mobile platforms.

In the short term, revenue from our PC market remains dependent on several factors, including underlying PC unit shipment growth and the extent to which our technologies are included in operating systems and ISV media applications. We continue to face risks relating to:


•	Purchasing trends away from traditional PCs and toward computing devices without optical disc, such as subnotebooks and tablets, which may not include our technologies;


•	The availability and market attractiveness of PC software that includes our technologies on an unauthorized and infringing basis, for which we receive no royalty payments; and


•	Continued decreasing inclusion of ISV media applications by PC OEMs in their Windows 7-based PCs, as Windows 7 already incorporates DVD playback software.

Our CE market is driven primarily by revenue attributable to sales of DVD and Blu-ray Disc players and recorders and represented approximately 22%, 21%, and 20% of licensing revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Blu-ray Disc players continue to represent an important source of revenue within our CE market, as these players are required to include Dolby Digital technology for primary audio content and our Dolby Digital Plus technology for secondary audio content. In addition, our Dolby TrueHD technology is an optional audio standard for Blu-ray Disc. Sales of DVD players are declining, as a result of the maturity of the DVD platform and a shift to Blu-ray Disc players; however, our revenue from sales of Blu-ray Disc players in recent quarters has not offset this decline. In the first half of fiscal 2012, we continued to see reductions in reported units of DVD players incorporating our technologies, as well as a slowing growth rate in the market for Blu-ray Disc players.

Revenue generated from our other markets includes revenue attributable to mobile, gaming, licensing services, and automotive, and represented approximately 15%, 18%, and 19% of licensing revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Mobile revenue is primarily driven by demand for the Dolby Digital Plus, AAC, Dolby Mobile, and Dolby Digital. We view the mobile device market as an area of opportunity for us to increase revenue; however, actual results may differ from our expectations. Revenue attributable to gaming and automotive is primarily driven by sales of video game consoles and in-car entertainment systems, respectively, that incorporate our Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, AAC, Dolby TrueHD, and ATRAC technologies. Licensing services revenue, from administration of joint licensing programs, is primarily driven by demand for standards-based audio compression technologies for broadcast, PC, CE, and mobile products.

Consumer entertainment products throughout the world incorporate our technologies. We expect that sales of such products incorporating our technologies in emerging economies such as Brazil, China, India, and Russia, will increase in the future as consumers in these markets acquire more disposable income with which to purchase entertainment products. However, events in these economies or in the world economy in general may contradict these expectations. Moreover, we expect that OEMs in lower-cost manufacturing countries, including China, will increase production in response to this demand and that traditional OEMs will continue to shift their manufacturing operations to these lower-cost manufacturing countries. There are substantial risks associated with doing business in such countries, including OEMs failing to report or underreporting shipments of products incorporating our technologies, that have affected and will continue to affect our operating results.

Revenue from Microsoft represented approximately 14% of our total revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, and included licensing revenue from our PC, CE, and other markets.

We continue to monitor the effects of the 2011 flooding and recent earthquake in Thailand to determine any potential risks of disruption that would adversely affect our operating results. While we do not expect the catastrophe to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, the impact on our licensees’ global supply chains remains uncertain.

Table of Contents

Products

Products revenue is driven primarily by sales of equipment to cinema operators and broadcasters and represented 20%, 14%, and 11% of our total revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively.

Our cinema products represented approximately 90%, 87%, and 86% of total products revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Sales of our cinema products tend to fluctuate based on underlying trends in the cinema industry, including the popularity of individual movies, as cinema owners often purchase equipment to meet expected box office demand.

The cinema industry is in the midst of a transition from traditional film to digital cinema, and we estimate that the industry is more than halfway through this transition. Digital cinema offers motion picture studios a means to save costs in printing and distributing movies, combat piracy, and enable repeated movie playback without degradation in image and audio quality. Our cinema products include our Dolby Digital Cinema screen server and central library server, for the storage and playback of digital content, and our digital audio processor, which provides audio control for our digital cinema servers. We expect that most cinema owners who are either constructing new theaters or upgrading existing theaters will choose digital cinema products over traditional film cinema products. However, our competitive position in the digital cinema market is not as strong as our position in the traditional film cinema market. For example, digital cinema specifications are based on open standards which, unlike traditional cinema standards, do not include our proprietary audio technologies. Furthermore, we are facing more pricing and other competitive pressures for our digital cinema products than we experience for our traditional film cinema products.

Digital cinema standards are defined by the Digital Cinema Initiative (“DCI”) specifications, and we have developed software for our currently available digital cinema server that is DCI compliant. This software was made commercially available during fiscal 2012. We do not have significant contractual provisions arising from the sale of products relating to DCI compliance that would require additional performance from us other than making the software update available to our customers.

Several of our competitors have introduced digital cinema products that support the playback of high frame rate content and also support presentation of movies with higher resolution “4K” digital cinema projectors. We are developing a 4K and high frame rate solution and expect to make it available in fiscal 2012. If we are unable to provide such a solution with a market competitive feature set and price, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our digital 3D products provide 3D image capabilities when combined with a digital cinema projector and server. Our cinema products revenue has been negatively impacted by declines in unit shipments for 3D products, as the market for 3D cinema equipment has become increasingly competitive. We also believe the decrease in revenue from our 3D products reflects the increasing saturation of 3D enabled screens within the cinema industry.

Our traditional film cinema products are used primarily to read, decode, and play back film soundtracks, to calibrate cinema sound systems, and to enable soundtracks encoded in digital audio formats to be played back on analog cinema audio systems. As investment by the cinema industry in digital cinema has increased, revenue from our traditional film cinema products has declined, and we expect this decline to continue.

Our broadcast products represented approximately 9%, 10%, and 11% of products revenue in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Our broadcast products are used to encode, transmit, and decode multiple channels of high quality audio content for DTV and HDTV program production and broadcast distribution and to measure the subjective loudness of audio content within broadcast programming.

In fiscal 2011, we began selling our Professional Reference Monitor product, a flat-panel video reference display for video professionals. These video professionals use the monitor for color critical tasks, such as calibrating color accuracy to professional reference standards. Our Professional Reference Monitor uses our dynamic range imaging technologies, which enhance contrast and extend brightness and dynamic range, while reducing power consumption in LED backlit LCD televisions. We do not anticipate generating significant revenue from this product in fiscal 2012.

Services

Services revenue represented approximately 3% of total revenue in each of fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012. The level of our services revenue is primarily tied to activity in the cinema industry, and in particular, to the number of movies being produced and distributed by studios and independent filmmakers. Several factors influence the number of movies produced in a given fiscal period, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry, as well as tax incentive arrangements provided by many governments to promote local filmmaking.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”), and pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. GAAP and SEC rules and regulations require us to use accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy or estimate to be critical if it is both important to a company’s financial condition and/or results of operations and requires significant judgment on the part of management in its application. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgment, and estimates. We have discussed the selection and development of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual results may differ from these estimates.

We consider the following to be critical accounting policies and estimates because we believe they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management judgments about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially, our reported financial condition and results of operation for future periods could be materially affected. See Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for further information on the potential risks to our future results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technologies, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer’s financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. Some of our revenue arrangements include multiple elements, such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services.

We evaluate each element in a multiple element (“ME”) arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately, and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period of time, after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized either over its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods used to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

Revenue recognition for transactions which involve software, such as fees we earn from integrated software vendors, requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for those elements. For some of our ME arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial software. These elements may include support and maintenance. The fair values of these elements are recognized over the estimated period for which these elements will be delivered, which is sometimes the estimated life of the software. If we do not have VSOE of fair value for any undelivered element included in these ME arrangements for software, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and/or services have been performed, or until we have VSOE of fair value for all remaining undelivered elements. If the undelivered

Table of Contents

element is support and we do not have fair value for the support element, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.

For ME arrangements containing both software and hardware, we allocate the arrangement fees to each element based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

We account for the majority of our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that may include up to three separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The third element is the right to receive specified upgrades, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered when a specified upgrade is available, subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, relative to the VSOE or ESP of the other elements, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees is allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, and in some cases to the undelivered specified upgrade element, based on the VSOE or ESP of each element. The portion of the arrangement fees allocated to the support and maintenance element is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period and the portion of the arrangement fees allocated to specified upgrades is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the upgrade.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the carrying value of the net assets of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to the fair value. If we determine that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we move to the second step to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference. We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and if an event occurs or circumstances change such that there is an indication of a reduction in the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.

We use the income approach to determine the fair value of our reporting units, which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows for each reporting unit. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of the reporting unit. At the time of our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2011, we had two reporting units: Via, which corresponds to our wholly owned subsidiary and has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology (“DET”), with goodwill of $268.0 million. The cash flow model was based on our best estimate of future revenue and operating costs. We estimated our future revenue by applying growth rates, consistent with those used in our internal forecasts, to our current revenue forecasts. The revenue and cost estimates were based on several sources, including our historical information, third-party industry data, and review of our internal operations. The cash flow forecasts were adjusted by a discount rate of approximately 13.5%, based on our weighted-average cost of capital derived by using the capital asset pricing model. The primary components of this model include weighting our total asset structure between our equity and debt, the risk-free rate of return on U.S. Treasury bonds, market risk premium based on a range of historical returns and forward-looking estimates, and the beta of our common stock. Our model used an effective tax rate of approximately 30%.

Based on the methodology described above, the fair value of our DET reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. Our market capitalization at the time of our fiscal 2011 goodwill impairment test was approximately $4.8 billion, which exceeded the aggregate carrying value of our reporting units by approximately 190%. There have been no events or changes in circumstances to indicate a reduction in the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value since our last annual goodwill impairment test.

Prior to our annual goodwill impairment test in the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we will early adopt the provisions of ASU 2011-08, as described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our condensed consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-08 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to fifteen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances

Table of Contents

indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparing its carrying value to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If we determine that the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We make estimates and judgments that affect our accounting for income taxes, including estimates of actual tax exposure and assessment of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences, including the timing of the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent that we believe recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance.

Our policy is to recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position is sustainable upon examination by tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. When accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, the deferred tax asset and liability balances, the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, and the reserve resulting from uncertain tax positions. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially affected if actual results differ significantly from these estimates or if the estimates are adjusted in future periods.

Valuation and Classification of Investments

We classify our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value using a three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the investment that are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity, such as market quoted prices. GAAP establishes a three-level hierarchy prioritizing the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: the fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets that are accessible by us at the measurement date for identical investments, described as Level 1, and the lowest priority to valuation techniques using unobservable inputs, described as Level 3. We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from a professional pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. Fair value from this professional pricing source can also be based on pricing models whereby all significant inputs, including maturity dates, issue dates, settlement dates, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market related data, are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset.

The degree to which estimates and judgment are used in determining fair value, is generally dependent upon the market pricing information available for the investments, the availability of observable inputs, the frequency of trading in the investments and the investment’s complexity. If different judgments regarding inputs were made, we could potentially reach different conclusions regarding the fair value of our investments.

Stock-Based Compensation

We determine the expense for all stock-based compensation awards by estimating their fair value and recognizing that value as an expense, on a ratable basis, in our consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period in which the awards are earned. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of the grant. To determine the fair value of a stock-based award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, we make assumptions regarding the expected term of the award, the expected future volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the award, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term of the award. We estimate the expected term of our stock-based awards by evaluating historical exercise patterns of our employees. We use a blend of the historical volatility of our common stock and the implied volatility of our traded options as an estimate of the expected volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the awards. We use an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments with terms consistent with the expected term of our awards to estimate the risk-free interest rate. We reduce the stock-based compensation expense for estimated forfeitures based on our historical experience. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and

Table of Contents

revise our estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from our estimate.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There have been no new accounting pronouncements not yet effective that have significance, or potential significance, to our consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Revenue



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Change					Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended						Change
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$			%		April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$			%
	($ in thousands)
Licensing	$	214,627		$	225,349		$	10,722		5	%	$	402,803		$	424,973		$	22,170		6	%
Percentage of total revenue	86		%	87		%						82		%	86		%
Products	26,347			27,228			881			3	%	72,374			53,628			(18,746		)	(26	)%
Percentage of total revenue	11		%	10		%						15		%	11		%
Services	9,052			7,682			(1,370		)	(15	)%	17,561			15,036			(2,525		)	(14	)%
Percentage of total revenue	3		%	3		%						3		%	3		%
Total revenue	$	250,026		$	260,259		$	10,233		4	%	$	492,738		$	493,637		$	899		0	%

Licensing. The 5% increase in licensing revenue from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increases in revenue from our broadcast and other markets, partially offset by a decrease in our PC market. The increase in revenue from our broadcast market was primarily driven by higher shipments in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 of televisions and digital set-top boxes that incorporate our technologies. The increase in revenue from our other markets was primarily driven by increased sales of mobile devices incorporating our Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby Digital technologies. The decrease in revenue from our PC market was primarily driven by lower reported units of Windows 7-based PCs and ISV decoders.

The 6% increase in licensing revenue from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was primarily driven by increases in revenue from our broadcast and other markets, partially offset by decreases in our CE and PC markets. The increases in revenue from broadcast and other markets are due to the same reasons described above. The decrease in our CE market was primarily driven by lower reported units of standard DVD players, while the decrease in revenue from our PC market was due to the same reasons described above.

Products. The 3% increase in products revenue from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from our digital cinema video and audio products, partially offset by decreases in revenue from our traditional cinema products and 3D products. Increases in our digital cinema products revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 resulted primarily from a release of deferred revenue related to DCI compliance for digital cinema video products, as well as increased unit shipments of our digital cinema audio and video products. Decreases in our 3D products and traditional cinema are primarily due to lower unit shipments and reduced pricing.

The 26% decrease in products revenue from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was primarily driven by a decrease in revenue from our 3D products, and to a lesser extent, by a decrease in revenue from our traditional cinema products, as described above.

Services. The 15% decrease in services revenue from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily attributable to decreases in production services revenue and virtual print fees, which were generated from certain leased digital cinema assets, as we discontinued this program in fiscal 2011. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in maintenance and support services.

The 14% decrease in services revenue from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was due to the same reasons discussed above.

Gross Margin

Table of Contents



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Fiscal Year-to-Date Ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
	($ in thousands)
Cost of licensing	$	5,771		$	3,303		$	9,732		$	6,631
Licensing gross margin percentage	97		%	99		%	98		%	98		%
Cost of products	20,031			17,635			42,229			31,523
Products gross margin percentage	24		%	35		%	42		%	41		%
Cost of services	2,655			2,654			5,635			5,848
Services gross margin percentage	71		%	65		%	68		%	61		%
Total gross margin percentage	89		%	91		%	88		%	91		%

Licensing Gross Margin. We license intellectual property to our customers that may be internally developed, acquired by us, or licensed from third parties. Our cost of licensing consists principally of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Our cost of licensing also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then sublicense to our customers. Licensing gross margin increased two points from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012, as a previously acquired intangible asset was fully amortized in fiscal 2011. Licensing gross margin remained flat from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012.

Products Gross Margin. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to the products sold, applied labor, manufacturing overhead and, to a lesser extent, amortization of certain intangible assets. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products. Products gross margin increased 11 points from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase is primarily due to the recognition of previously deferred product sales related to DCI compliance and 3D kit sales, as well as lower discrete charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2011. These increases were partially offset by price reductions on our 3D and digital cinema audio products.

Products gross margin decreased one point from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to decreased unit sales of 3D products and price reductions in digital cinema audio and video products. This decrease was partially offset by the recognition of previously deferred product sales related to DCI compliance and 3D kit sales and lower discrete charges in the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, as discussed above.

Services Gross Margin. Cost of services primarily consists of compensation and benefits expenses for employees performing our professional services and the cost of outside consultants. Services gross margin decreased six points from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 due to decreased revenues which were not fully offset by decreased costs, as well as a decrease in virtual print fees, which had relatively higher gross margins.

Services gross margin decreased seven points from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 due to the same reasons discussed above.

Operating Expenses



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Change				Fiscal Year-to-Date ended						Change
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$		%		April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$		%
	($ in thousands)
Research and development	$	28,399		$	34,236		$	5,837	21	%	$	56,726		$	67,062		$	10,336	18	%
Percentage of total revenue	11		%	13		%					12		%	13		%
Sales and marketing	37,545			43,194			5,649		15	%	75,762			86,210			10,448		14	%
Percentage of total revenue	15		%	17		%					15		%	17		%
General and administrative	35,155			37,281			2,126		6	%	72,197			72,746			549		1	%
Percentage of total revenue	14		%	14		%					15		%	14		%
Restructuring charges, net	—			910			910		100	%	785			1,278			493		63	%
Percentage of total revenue	n/a			n/a							n/a			n/a
	$	101,099		$	115,621		$	14,522	14	%	$	205,470		$	227,296		$	21,826	11	%

Table of Contents

The fiscal periods presented herein include the 13 week periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, and the 27 week period ended April 1, 2011 and the 26 week period ended March 30, 2012.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, consulting and contract labor costs, depreciation and amortization expenses, facilities costs, and information technology expenses. The 21% increase in research and development expenses from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount, as well as higher facilities and related costs resulting from worldwide expansion.

The 18% increase in research and development expenses from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was due to the same reasons discussed above.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, marketing and promotional expenses, travel-related expenses for our sales and marketing functions, facilities costs, depreciation and amortization expenses, and information technology expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased 15% from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012, primarily driven by increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount, as well as higher consulting costs, and facilities costs resulting from worldwide expansion. These increases were partially offset by increased settlements from implementation licensees in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which are recorded as an offset to sales and marketing expenses.

The 14% increase in sales and marketing expenses from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was primarily driven by increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount, stock-based compensation, and increased facilities costs resulting from worldwide expansion. Additionally, increased settlements from implementation licensees in fiscal 2012 partially offset the increases noted above, which are recorded as an offset to sales and marketing expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, depreciation, information technology expenses, and facilities costs. The 6% increase in general and administrative expenses from the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount and increases in professional services, partially offset by decreases in consulting and contract labor costs.

The 1% increase in general and administrative expenses from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 was due to the same reasons discussed above. In addition, stock-based compensation expenses decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, due to recognition in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 of expense upon the accelerated vesting of equity awards granted to a former employee under a separation agreement.

Restructuring Charges, net. Restructuring charges for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012 include severance and other associated costs attributable to the strategic restructuring program we initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. For additional details, see Note 6 “Restructuring” to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other Income, Net



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Change					Fiscal Year-to-Date ended						Change
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$			%		April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			$			%
	($ in thousands)
Interest income	$	1,953		$	1,414		$	(539	)	(28	)%	$	3,567		$	3,151		$	(416	)	(12	)%
Interest expense	(85		)	(5		)	80			94	%	(368		)	(31		)	337			92	%
Other income, net	156			60			(96		)	(62	)%	689			260			(429		)	(62	)%
Total other income, net	$	2,024		$	1,469		$	(555	)	(27	)%	$	3,888		$	3,380		$	(508	)	(13	)%

Other income, net, primarily consists of interest income earned on cash, cash equivalents, and investments, as well as net gains/losses from foreign currency transactions.

Income Taxes

Table of Contents



	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Fiscal Year-to-Date ended
	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012			April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
	($ in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	40,012		$	34,198		$	64,313		$	64,036
Effective tax rate	33		%	28		%	28		%	28		%

Our effective tax rate is based on a projection of our annual fiscal year results. Our effective tax rate was 33% and 28% for the second quarters of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, respectively, and 28% and 28% for the fiscal year-to-date periods ended April 1, 2011 and March 30, 2012, respectively.

Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Financial Condition



	September 30, 2011			March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	551,512		$	747,988
Short-term investments	391,281			350,735
Long-term investments	272,797			209,804
Accounts receivable, net	61,815			57,762
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	127,922			113,689
Working capital^(a)	999,213			1,144,207

	April 1, 2011			March 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	171,591		$	214,669
Capital expenditures^(b)	(19,551		)	(30,450		)
Repurchase of common stock	(75,124		)	(86,149		)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities	(149,735		)	64,410
Net cash used in financing activities	(48,604		)	(82,200		)

^(a) Working capital consists of total current assets less total current liabilities.

^(b) Capital expenditures consist of purchases of office equipment, building fixtures, computer hardware and software, leasehold improvements, production and test equipment.

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, and investments, as well as cash flows from operations. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and potential cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months.

We have historically generated significant cash from our operations; however, there can be no assurance that our operations will continue to generate significant cash flows in the future. We retain sufficient cash holdings to support our operations and we also purchase investment grade securities diversified among security types, industries, and issuers. We have used cash generated from our operations to fund a variety of activities related to our business in addition to our ongoing operations, including business expansion and growth, acquisitions, and repurchases of our common stock. Cash provided by operations and the value of our investment portfolio could also be affected by various risks and uncertainties, as described in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $43.1 million from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011

Table of Contents

to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, primarily due to the following:


•	An increase in the cash flows from collections of accounts receivable from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012; and


•	Increases in cash flows from other changes in operating assets and liabilities; partially offset by


•	A decrease in net income.

Net cash provided by investing activities increased $214.1 million from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, primarily due to the following:


•	A decrease in purchases of available-for-sale securities; offset by


•	A decrease in proceeds from the sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities; and


•	A decrease in capital expenditures due to significant worldwide expansion in the first half of fiscal 2011.

Net cash used in financing activities increased $33.6 million from the fiscal year-to-date period ended April 1, 2011 to the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, primarily due to the following:


•	A decrease in net proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the related tax benefit; and


•	An increase in share repurchases of our Class A common stock.

Off-Balance-Sheet and Contractual Obligations

Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

There has been no material change in our contractual obligations other than in the ordinary course of business since our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. For additional details regarding our contractual obligations, see Note 9 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Sensitivity

We had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaling approximately $1.3 billion at March 30, 2012. This amount was invested primarily in money market funds, corporate notes and bonds, municipal debt securities, and U.S. agency securities. Our investment policy and strategy are focused on the preservation of capital and on supporting our liquidity requirements. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged financial instruments. Our holdings of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, the majority of which are managed by external managers, meet the guidelines of our investment policy. We invest in highly rated securities with a minimum credit rating of A- and our policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer other than the U.S. government. At March 30, 2012, our weighted-average portfolio credit quality was AA and the weighted-average duration of our investment portfolio was less than one year.

Our fixed-income portfolio is subject to fluctuations in interest rates, which could affect our financial position, and to a lesser extent, results of operations. Based on our investment portfolio balance as of March 30, 2012, a hypothetical change in interest rates of 1% would have approximately a $4.0 million impact, and a change of 0.5% would have approximately a $2.0 million impact on the carrying value of our portfolio.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries, most significantly in the United Kingdom, Australia, China, the Netherlands, and Germany. We also conduct a growing portion of our business outside of the U.S. through subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar (primarily British Pound, Australian Dollar, Chinese Yuan Renminbi, and Euro). As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. Most of our revenue from international markets is denominated in U.S. dollars, while the operating expenses of our international subsidiaries are predominantly denominated in local currency. Therefore, if the U.S. dollar weakens against the local currency, we will have increased operating expenses, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against the local currency, operating expenses will decrease, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains or losses that are reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Our international operations are subject to risks typical of international business, including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility.

Table of Contents

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against assets and liabilities for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure, in an effort to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded to other income, net, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Our foreign currency forward contracts which are not designated as hedging instruments are used to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with intercompany receivables and payables. These contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to offset gains and losses on the related receivables and payables for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure. As of September 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012, the outstanding derivative instruments had maturities of 30 days or less and the total notional amounts of outstanding contracts were $4.7 million and $10.1 million, respectively. The fair values of these contracts were nominal as of September 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012, and were included in prepaids and other current assets and other accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.

A sensitivity analysis was performed on all of our foreign currency forward contracts as of March 30, 2012. This sensitivity analysis was based on a modeling technique that measures the hypothetical market value resulting from a 10% shift in the value of exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. For these forward contracts, duration modeling was used where hypothetical changes are made to the spot rates of the currency. A 10% increase in the value of the U.S. dollar would lead to an increase in the fair value of our financial instruments by $1.0 million. Conversely, a 10% decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar would result in a decrease in the fair value of these financial instruments by $1.0 million.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Subject to the limitations noted above, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to meet the objective for which they were designed and operate at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We depend on the sale by our licensees of products that incorporate our technologies and any reduction in those sales would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

Licensing revenue constitutes the majority of our total revenue, representing 77%, 83%, and 86% in fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. We do not manufacture consumer entertainment products ourselves and we depend on licensees and customers, including software vendors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”), to incorporate our technologies into their products.

Although we have license agreements with many of these companies, these agreements do not have minimum purchase commitments, are non-exclusive, and do not generally require incorporation or use of our technologies. Accordingly, our revenue will decline if our licensees choose not to incorporate our technologies in their products, or if they sell fewer products incorporating our technologies, or if they otherwise face significant economic difficulties. Changes in consumer tastes or trends, rapidly evolving technology, competing products, changes in industry standards or adverse changes in business and economic conditions, among other things, may result in lower sales of products incorporating our technologies which would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

We also face the risk that our licensees retain product channel inventory levels that exceed future anticipated sales. If such product sales do not occur in the time frame anticipated by our licensees for any reason, these licensees may substantially decrease the number of technologies they license from us in subsequent periods.

We continue to monitor the effects of the 2011 flooding and recent earthquake in Thailand to determine any potential risks of disruption that would adversely affect our operating results. While we do not expect the catastrophes to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, the impact on our licensees’ global supply chains remains uncertain.

To the extent that sales of PCs with Dolby technologies decline, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

Revenue from our PC market depends on several factors, including underlying PC unit shipment growth, the extent to which our technologies are included on computers, through operating systems, independent software vendors (“ISV”) media applications, or otherwise, and the terms of any royalties or other payments we receive from licensors of such software. In the short term, we face many risks in the PC market that may affect our ability to successfully participate in that market, including, but not limited to the following:


•	Purchasing trends away from traditional PCs and toward computing devices without optical disc, such as subnotebooks and tablets, which may not include our technologies;


•	The availability and market attractiveness of PC software that includes our technologies on an unauthorized and infringing basis, for which we receive no royalty payments; and


•	Continued decreasing inclusion of ISV media applications by PC OEMs in their Windows 7- based PCs, as Windows 7 already incorporates DVD playback software.

In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft relating to the inclusion of Dolby Digital Plus decoding and Dolby Digital Consumer Encoder in the Windows 8 operating system. There are no assurances that we will derive as much licensing revenue under this model as we did under our prior licensing arrangements with Microsoft. The ultimate financial impact of these licensing arrangements for Windows 8 on our licensing revenue is subject to various risks, including:

Table of Contents


•	The extent and rate at which Windows 8 is adopted in the marketplace;


•	The extent to which OEMs include optical disc playback in Windows 8 devices;


•	The extent to which earlier versions of Microsoft operating systems, including Windows 7, continue to be licensed after the release of Windows 8;


•	Our ability to establish and extend licensing relationships directly with PC OEMs and ISVs;


•	The rate at which entertainment content shifts from optical disc media to online media, thus reducing the need for PCs to have optical disc drives and DVD and Blu-ray Disc software players; and


•	Our ability to extend the adoption of our technologies to online and mobile platforms and devices.

Any of these risks could adversely affect our licensing revenue.

General economic conditions may reduce our revenue and harm our business.

We continue to be cautious regarding future general economic conditions and their potential for suppressed consumer demand in the markets in which we license our technologies and sell our products. Our business could be affected by adverse changes in general economic conditions, because many of the products in which our technologies are incorporated are discretionary goods, such as PCs, digital televisions, set-top boxes, DVD players and recorders, Blu-ray Disc players, video game consoles, audio/video receivers, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, home-theater-in-a-box systems, camcorders, and portable media devices. The global economic environment has adversely affected consumer confidence, disposable income, and spending. While we cannot predict future general economic conditions, these conditions may persist or worsen.

Furthermore, continued weakness in general economic conditions may result in a greater likelihood that more of our licensees and customers will become delinquent on their obligations to us or be unable to pay, which in turn could result in a higher level of write-offs. Additionally, such economic conditions may result in increased underreporting and non-reporting of royalty-bearing revenue by our licensees as well as increased unauthorized use of our technologies, all of which would adversely affect our revenues.

Our future success depends upon the growth of new and existing markets for our technologies and our ability to develop and adapt our technologies for those markets.

The future growth of our licensing revenue will depend, in part, upon the growth of, and our successful participation in, new and existing markets for our technologies, such as digital broadcast, online and mobile media distribution, consumer video and voice. For example, growth of our broadcast revenue is dependent upon continued global growth of digital television broadcasting and the adoption of our technologies into emerging digital broadcast standards. In addition, our revenue is dependent upon the growth of the PC market and the continued adoption of our technologies into PCs as well as the adoption of our technologies into connected portable devices such as tablets and smartphones. Furthermore, our ability to drive OEM demand for our technologies depends in part on whether or not we are able to successfully participate in the online and mobile content delivery markets.

Our ability to penetrate new and existing markets for our technologies depends on increased consumer demand for products that contain our technologies, which may not occur. Some of these markets are ones in which we have not previously participated or have limited experience, such as voice and consumer video, and we may not adequately adapt our business and our technologies to consumer demand.

If new and existing markets for our technologies do not develop or consumer demand for products that contain our technologies does not grow, our business and prospects would be materially adversely affected.

If we do not continue to develop and deliver innovative technologies in response to industry and technology changes, our business could decline.

The markets for our technologies and products are defined by:


•	Rapid technological change;


•	New and improved technology and product introductions;


•	Changing consumer and licensee demands;


•	Evolving industry standards; and


•	Technology and product obsolescence.

Our future success depends on our ability to enhance our existing technologies and products and to develop acceptable

Table of Contents

new technologies and products that address the needs of the market in a timely manner. The development of enhanced and new technologies and products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, highly-skilled engineering and development personnel, and the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We may not be able to identify, develop, acquire, market, or support new or enhanced technologies or products on a timely basis, if at all. For example, while we view the continued advancements in online and mobile media content delivery as an area of opportunity, if we are not able to competitively address the needs of the changing online and mobile markets, our ability to generate revenue from those markets would be limited. At times such changes can be dramatic, such as the shift from VHS tapes to DVDs for consumer playback of movies in homes and elsewhere.

We face many risks related to the emerging 3D cinema market.

We face many risks in the 3D cinema market which may affect our ability to successfully participate in that market, including, but not limited to the following:


•	We face risks that our customers maintain excess product inventory levels which could reduce future anticipated sales;


•	At least one of our competitors has exclusive licensing arrangements for 3D products with theater exhibitors, which has in the past and we expect will in the future restrict our ability to compete in the 3D market;


•	The 3D market has become increasingly competitive and we may lose further market share;


•	As the industry transition to 3D enabled screens becomes substantially complete, demand for new 3D enabled screens will drop significantly and the industry will enter into a replacement cycle;


•	Industry participants may perceive our up-front 3D equipment costs and reusable glasses business model or our 3D products as less attractive;


•	Our participation in the 3D cinema market will be limited to the extent theaters do not convert from analog to digital cinema;


•	Demand for our 3D cinema products is driven by the number of 3D cinema releases and the commercial success of those releases;


•	Our 3D glasses could become subject to regulation in the U.S. and other countries in the future, which could restrict how our 3D glasses are manufactured, used, or marketed; and


•	There has been increased public scrutiny of potential health risks relating to viewing 3D movies. If these potential health risks are substantiated, the popularity of 3D movies could decline. In addition, if health risks associated with our 3D products materialize, we may become subject to government regulation or product liability claims, including personal injury claims.

If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our ability to compete profitably in the 3D cinema market may be adversely affected.

Events and conditions in the cinema and broadcast industries may affect sales of our cinema products and other services.

Sales of our cinema products and services tend to fluctuate based on the underlying trends in the cinema industry. For example, when box office receipts for the cinema industry increase, we have typically seen a corresponding increase in sales of our cinema products, as cinema owners will be more likely to build new theaters and upgrade existing theaters with our more advanced products. Conversely, when box office receipts are down, cinema owners tend to scale back on plans to expand or upgrade their systems.

Our cinema product sales are also subject to fluctuations based on events and conditions in the cinema industry generally that may or may not be tied to box office receipts in particular time periods. For example, the growth in piracy of motion pictures adversely affects the construction of new screens, the renovation of existing theaters, and the continued production of new motion pictures.

Our services revenue, both in the U.S. and internationally, is tied to the number of movies being produced and distributed by studios and independent filmmakers. A number of factors can affect the number of movies that are produced, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry, as well as tax incentive arrangements provided by many governments to promote local filmmaking.

The demand for our cinema products and services could decline as the cinema industry adopts digital cinema.

As cinema exhibitors have constructed new theaters or upgraded existing theaters, they have generally chosen digital cinema over traditional film cinema and we expect this trend to continue. Digital cinema, which is based on open standards, does not include our proprietary audio technologies. As the cinema industry continues to adopt digital cinema, the demand for our traditional film cinema products and services has declined significantly and we anticipate that the demand for film based products will decline in future periods. Furthermore, exhibitors adopting digital cinema can choose from multiple digital cinema playback servers and audio processors, many of which may not contain our technologies, and our competitive position

Table of Contents

in the digital cinema market is not as strong as our position in the traditional film cinema market. Decreases in demand for our traditional film cinema products and services accompanied by decreases in revenue from digital cinema products and services would adversely affect our revenue stream from the cinema industry.

A decrease in demand for our cinema products and services could adversely affect our consumer products licensing business.

A decrease in the demand for our cinema products and services could adversely affect licensing of our consumer technologies, because the strength of our brand and our ability to use professional product developments to introduce new technologies, which can later be licensed to OEMs and service providers, would be impaired. If, in such circumstances, we are unable to adapt our products and services or introduce new products for the digital cinema market successfully, our business could be materially adversely affected.

We face risks relating to the online and mobile content delivery markets and declines in optical disc media.

For nearly 20 years, movies have been distributed, purchased, and consumed through optical disc media, such as DVD and more recently Blu-ray Disc. However, the growth of the Internet and home computer usage, connected televisions, set-top boxes, tablets, smartphones, and other devices accompanied by the rapid advancement of online and mobile content delivery has resulted in the recent trend to movie download and streaming services in various parts of the world. We expect a further shift away from optical disc media to online and mobile media content consumption, which will result in declines in revenue from DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. Such declines would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

In addition, online and mobile media content services that compete with or replace DVD and Blu-ray Disc players as dominant media for consumer video entertainment may choose not to encode their content with our proprietary technologies, which could affect OEM and software vendor demand for our decoding technologies. Furthermore, our participation in online media content playback may be less profitable for us than DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. The online and mobile markets are characterized by intense competition, evolving industry standards and business and distribution models, disruptive software and hardware technology developments, frequent new product and service introductions, short product and service life cycles, and price sensitivity on the part of consumers, all of which may result in downward pressure on pricing. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our operating results may fluctuate depending upon the timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees, royalty report adjustments, and the satisfaction of our revenue recognition criteria.

Our quarterly operating results fluctuate based on the risks set forth in this section, as well as on:


•	The timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees and when we have met all revenue recognition criteria;


•	Royalty reports including positive or negative corrective adjustments;


•	Retroactive royalties that cover extended periods of time;


•	The recognition of unusually large amounts of licensing revenue from licensees in any given quarter because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods; and


•	The recognition of large amounts of products and services revenue in any given quarter because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods.

This can result in the recognition of a large amount of revenue in a given quarter that is not necessarily indicative of the amounts of revenue to be received in future quarters, thus causing fluctuations in our operating results.

Inaccurate licensee royalty reporting could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We generate licensing revenue primarily from OEMs and software vendors who license our technologies and incorporate those technologies in their products. Our license agreements generally obligate our licensees to pay us a specified royalty for every product they ship that incorporates our technologies, and we rely on our licensees to accurately report their shipments. However, we have difficulty independently determining whether or not our licensees are reporting shipments accurately, particularly with respect to software incorporating our technologies because unauthorized copies of such software can be made relatively easily. Most of our license agreements permit us to audit our licensees’ records, but audits are generally expensive, time consuming, and potentially detrimental to our ongoing business relationships with our licensees.

In the past, licensees, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, have understated or failed to report the number of products incorporating our technologies that they shipped, and we have not been able to collect and recognize revenue to which we were entitled. We expect that we will continue to experience understatement and non-reporting of royalties by our

Table of Contents

licensees, which could adversely affect our operating results. Conversely, to the extent that our licensees overstate the number of products incorporating our technologies, or report the products under the wrong categories, corrections of prior reports could result in reductions of royalty revenue in subsequent periods, which could also adversely affect our operating results.

Third parties from whom we license technologies may challenge our calculation of the royalties we owe them for inclusion of their technologies in our products and licensed technologies, which could adversely affect our operating results, business, and prospects.

In some cases, the products we sell and the technologies we license to our customers include intellectual property that we have licensed from third parties. Our agreements with these third parties generally require us to pay them royalties for that use, and give the third parties the right to audit our calculation of those royalties. A third party may disagree with our interpretation of the terms of a license agreement or, as a result of an audit, a third party could challenge the accuracy of our calculation. We have in the past been, and may in the future be, involved in disputes with third-party technology licensors regarding license terms.

A successful challenge by a third party could result in the termination of a license agreement or increase the amount of royalties we have to pay to the third party, which would decrease our gross margin and adversely affect our operating results.

Unauthorized use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We have often experienced, and expect to continue to experience, problems with non-licensee OEMs and software vendors, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, incorporating our technologies and trademarks into their products without our authorization and without paying us any licensing fees. Manufacturers of integrated circuits, or ICs, containing our technologies occasionally sell these ICs to third parties who are not our system licensees. These sales, and the failure of such manufacturers to report the sales, facilitate the unauthorized use of our intellectual property. As emerging economies transition from analog to digital content, such as the transition from analog to digital broadcast, we expect to experience increased problems with this form of piracy, which would adversely affect our operating results.

We have limited experience in non-sound technology markets which could limit our future growth.

Our future growth will depend, in part, upon our expansion into areas beyond sound technologies. For example, in addition to our digital cinema and 3D digital cinema initiatives, we are exploring other areas that facilitate delivery of digital entertainment, such as video solutions for the consumer market. We will need to spend considerable resources in the future on research and development or acquisitions in order to deliver innovative non-sound products and technologies. However, we have limited experience in non-sound technology markets and, despite our efforts, non-sound products, technologies, and services we expect to develop or acquire and market may not achieve or sustain market acceptance, may not meet industry needs, and may not be accepted as industry standards. If we are unsuccessful in selling non-sound products, technologies, and services, the future growth of our business may be limited.

If our products and technologies are not adopted as industry standards, our business prospects could be limited and our operating results could be adversely affected.

The entertainment industry depends upon industry standards to ensure compatibility across delivery platforms and a wide variety of consumer entertainment products. Accordingly, we make significant efforts to design our products and technologies to address capability, quality, and cost considerations so that they either meet, or, more importantly, are adopted as, industry standards across the broad range of entertainment industry markets in which we participate, as well as the markets in which we hope to compete in the future. To have our products and technologies adopted as industry standards, we must convince a broad spectrum of standards-setting organizations throughout the world, as well as our major customers and licensees who are members of such organizations, to adopt them as such and to ensure that other industry standards are consistent with our products and technologies. If our technologies are not adopted or do not remain as industry standards, our business, operating results, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Additionally, the market for broadcast technologies has traditionally been heavily based on industry standards, often set by governments or other standards-setting organizations, and we expect this to be the case in the future. If our technologies are not chosen as industry standards for broadcasting in particular geographic areas, this could adversely affect our ability to compete in these markets.

It may be more difficult for us, in the future, to have our technologies adopted as individual industry standards to the extent that entertainment industry participants collaborate on the development of industry standard technologies.

Standards-setting organizations are increasingly adopting or establishing technology standards for use in a wide range of consumer entertainment products. As a result, it is more difficult for individual companies to have their technologies adopted

Table of Contents

wholesale as an informal industry standard. We call this type of standard a “de facto” industry standard, meaning that the industry has widely adopted the technology, although no industry standards-setting organization has explicitly mandated such standard. Increasingly there are multiple companies, including ones that typically compete against one another, involved in the development of new technologies for use in entertainment-oriented products. As a result, these companies often license their collective intellectual property rights as a group, making it more difficult for any single company to have its technologies adopted widely as a de facto industry standard or to have its technologies adopted as an exclusive, explicit industry standard for consumer entertainment products.

Even if our technologies are adopted as an explicit industry standard for a particular market, market participants may not widely adopt our technologies.

Even when a standards-setting organization mandates our technologies for a particular market, which we call an “explicit” industry standard, our technologies may not be the sole technologies adopted for that market as an explicit industry standard. Accordingly, our operating results depend upon participants in that market choosing to adopt our technologies instead of competitive technologies that also may be acceptable under such standard. For example, the continued growth of our revenue from the broadcast market will depend upon both the continued global adoption of digital television generally and the choice to use our technologies where it is one of several accepted industry standards.

If we do not obtain new patents or proprietary technologies as our existing patents expire, our licensing revenue could decline.

We hold patents covering much of the technologies that we license to system licensees, and our licensing revenue is tied in large part to the life of those patents. Our right to receive royalties related to our patents terminates with the expiration of the last patent covering the relevant technologies in a particular country. Accordingly, to the extent that we do not replace licensing revenue from technologies covered by expiring patents with licensing revenue based on new patents and proprietary technologies, our revenue could decline.

As of March 30, 2012, we had nearly 2,600 individual issued patents and over 2,500 pending patent applications in over 90 jurisdictions throughout the world. Our issued patents are scheduled to expire at various times through November 2032. Of these, 13 patents are scheduled to expire in the remainder of calendar year 2012, 30 patents are scheduled to expire in calendar year 2013 and 91 patents are scheduled to expire in calendar year 2014. Patents relating to our Dolby Digital technologies, from which we principally derive our licensing revenue, have begun to expire and the remaining patents relating to this technology generally expire between now and 2017. Additional patents relating to our Dolby Digital Plus technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, expire between 2018 and 2026. In addition, the remaining patents relating to Dolby Digital Live technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, are scheduled to expire between now and 2021.

The markets for our technologies are highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete successfully, our business will suffer.

The markets for entertainment industry technologies are highly competitive, and we face competitive threats and pricing pressure in our markets. Competitors for our licensed technologies include: Audyssey Laboratories, DTS, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Microsoft, Monster Cable Products, Philips, RealNetworks, Sony, SRS Labs, Technicolor, and Waves Audio. Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REALD, Rovi, Sony, Technicolor, USL, and XpanD. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony. Consumers may perceive the quality of the audio experience produced by some of our competitors’ technologies to be equivalent or superior to the audio experience produced by our technologies. Other companies may become competitors in one or more of these areas in the future.

Additionally, some of our current or future competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do, or may have more experience or advantages in the markets in which they compete, particularly in the market for online media content. These competitors may also be able to offer integrated system solutions in markets for sound or non-sound entertainment technologies on a royalty-free basis or at a lower price than our technologies, including audio, video, and rights management technologies related to PCs or the Internet, which could make competing technologies that we develop unnecessary.

Our business and prospects depend on the strength of our brand, and if we do not maintain and strengthen our brand, our business will be materially harmed.

Maintaining and strengthening the Dolby brand is critical to maintaining and expanding our licensing, products, and services business, as well as to our ability to enter new markets for our sound and other technologies. Our continued success depends, in part, on our reputation for providing high quality technologies, products, and services across a wide range of

Table of Contents

entertainment markets, including the CE, PC, broadcast, and gaming markets. If we fail to promote and maintain the Dolby brand successfully in licensing, products or services, our business and prospects will suffer. Furthermore, we believe that the strength of our brand may affect the likelihood that our technologies are adopted as industry standards in various markets and for various applications. Our ability to maintain and strengthen our brand will depend heavily on our ability to develop innovative technologies for the entertainment industry, to successfully enter into new markets, and to provide high quality products and services in these new markets, which we may not do successfully.

Our licensing of industry standard technologies can be subject to restrictions that could adversely affect our business and prospects.

When a standards-setting organization mandates our technologies as explicit industry standards, we generally must agree to license such technologies on a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory basis, which could limit our control over the use of these technologies. In these situations, we must often limit the royalty rates we charge for these technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue. Furthermore, we may be unable to limit to whom we license such technologies, and may be unable to restrict many terms of the license.

We have in the past, and may in the future, be subject to claims that our industry standard technologies may not conform to the requirements of the standards-setting organization. Allegations such as these could be asserted in private actions seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. Claimants in such cases could seek to restrict or change our licensing practices or our ability to license our technologies in ways that could injure our reputation and otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

We face risks in conducting business in China and other emerging economies.

We believe that various trends will increase our exposure to the risks of conducting business in emerging economies. For example, we expect the number of OEMs in emerging economies, such as China, to increase due to the availability of lower manufacturing costs as compared to those of other industrial countries and the continued industry shift by retailers towards lower end DVD and more recently Blu-ray Disc player and television offerings. We have seen OEMs shift product manufacturing to these lower cost manufacturing countries and expect more OEMs to do so in the future. We also believe that our sales of products and services in emerging economies will expand in the future to the extent that the use of digital surround sound technologies increases in these countries, including in movies and broadcast television, and as consumers there become more affluent. We face many risks associated with operating in these emerging economies, in large part due to limited recognition and enforcement of contractual and intellectual property rights. As a result, we may experience difficulties in enforcing our intellectual property rights in these emerging economies, where intellectual property rights are not as respected as they are in the U.S., Japan, and Europe. We believe that it is critical that we strengthen existing relationships and develop new relationships with entertainment industry participants worldwide to increase our ability to enforce our intellectual property and contractual rights without relying solely on the legal systems in the countries in which we operate. If we are unable to develop, maintain, and strengthen these relationships, our revenue from these countries could be adversely affected.

We have limited or no patent protection for some of our technologies in particular countries, including China, Taiwan, and India, which could limit our ability to grow our business in these markets.

In China and Taiwan we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies. In India, we have no issued patents for Dolby Digital technologies. Consequently, maintaining or growing our licensing revenue will depend on our ability to obtain patent rights in these countries for existing and new technologies, which is uncertain. Furthermore, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is likewise uncertain.

Our licensing revenue depends in large part upon semiconductor manufacturers incorporating our technologies into integrated circuits.

Our licensing revenue from system licensees depends in large part upon the availability of ICs that implement our technologies. IC manufacturers incorporate our technologies into these ICs, which are then incorporated in consumer entertainment products. We do not manufacture these ICs, but rather depend on IC manufacturers to develop, produce, and then sell them to system licensees. We do not control the IC manufacturers’ decisions whether or not to incorporate our technologies into their ICs, and we do not control their product development or commercialization efforts nor predict their success. As a result, if these IC manufacturers are unable or unwilling, for any reason, to implement our technologies into their ICs, or if, for any reason, they sell fewer ICs incorporating our technologies, our operating results will be adversely affected.

Pricing pressures on the system licensees who incorporate our technologies into their products could limit the licensing fees we charge for our technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue.

Table of Contents

The markets for the consumer entertainment products in which our technologies are incorporated are intensely competitive and price sensitive. We expect to face increased royalty pricing pressure for our technologies as we seek to drive the adoption of our technologies into online content and portable devices, such as tablets and smart phones. Retail prices for consumer entertainment products that include our sound technologies, such as DVD players and home theater systems, have decreased significantly, and we expect prices to decrease for the foreseeable future. In response, OEMs have sought to reduce their product costs, which can result in downward pressure on the licensing fees we charge our customers who incorporate our technologies into the consumer entertainment products that they sell. Furthermore, while we have contractual rights with many of our licensees for cost of living adjustments to our royalty rights, we may not be able to negotiate those terms in our contracts with existing and new licensees. Additionally, downward cost of living adjustments would result in declines in the licensing fees that we charge. A decline in, or the modification or loss of the contractual right to increase, the licensing fees we charge could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

We have in the past, and may in the future be, subject to legal claims related to our intellectual property rights, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages, and could limit our ability to use particular technologies in the future.

Companies in the technology and entertainment industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have faced such claims in the past and we expect to face similar claims in the future.

Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle, and could divert management resources and attention. In the past we have settled claims relating to infringement allegations and agreed to make payments in connection with such settlements. We expect that similar claims will be asserted against us in the future in the ordinary course of our business. An adverse determination in any intellectual property claim could require that we pay damages or stop using technologies found to be in violation of a third party’s rights and could prevent us from offering our products and services to others. In order to avoid these restrictions, we may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Any license could also require us to pay significant royalties, and may significantly increase our operating expenses. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technologies, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technologies for any aspects of our business found to be infringing, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively.

In some instances, we have contractually agreed to provide indemnifications to licensees relating to our intellectual property. Additionally, at times in the past, we have chosen to defend our licensees from third-party intellectual property infringement claims even where such defense was not contractually required, and we may choose to take on such defense in the future. Any of these results could harm our brand, our operating results, and our financial condition.

We have in the past and may in the future have disputes with our licensees regarding our licensing arrangements.

At times, we are engaged in disputes regarding the licensing of our intellectual property rights, including matters related to our royalty rates and other terms of our licensing arrangements. These types of disputes can be asserted by our customers or prospective customers or by other third parties as part of negotiations with us or in private actions seeking monetary damages or injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. In the past, licensees have threatened to initiate litigation against us regarding our licensing royalty rate practices including our adherence to licensing on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms and potential antitrust claims. Damages and requests for injunctive relief asserted in claims like these could be material, and could be disruptive to our business. Any disputes with our customers or potential customers or other third parties could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We face risks relating to the transition to digital cinema.

We face a number of risks relating to the transition to digital cinema, including:


•	Exhibitors may perceive competing products to be potentially advantageous to our products or they may choose lower priced competing products or competing products with different features, such as support for high frame rate content or 4K presentation;


•	If we encounter delays in the development of our 4K digital cinema or high frame rate content solutions or if we are unable to provide a solution with a market competitive feature set and price, our results of operations could be adversely affected;


•	At least one of our competitors has a significantly greater installed base of its digital cinema servers than we do which has and likely will continue to limit our share of the digital cinema market, particularly in the U.S. market;


•	Pricing and other competitive pressures have caused us to implement pricing strategies which have had an adverse

Table of Contents

effect on our products gross margins;


•	As the industry transition to digital cinema becomes substantially complete, the demand for new digital cinema screens will drop significantly and the industry will enter into a replacement cycle.

These and other risks related to digital cinema could limit our future prospects in digital cinema and could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

Acquisition activities could result in operating difficulties and other harmful consequences.

We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of possible strategic transactions, including acquisitions. We consider these types of transactions in connection with our efforts to expand our business beyond sound technologies. Although we cannot predict whether or not we will complete any such acquisition or other transactions in the future, any of these transactions could be material in relation to our market capitalization, financial condition, or results of operations. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology may create unforeseen difficulties and expenditures. Foreign acquisitions involve unique risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different geographies, cultures, and languages, currency risks, and risks associated with the particular economic, political, and regulatory environment in specific countries. Also, the anticipated benefit of our acquisitions may not materialize.

We face various risks in integrating acquired businesses, including:


•	Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to acquisition integration challenges;


•	Cultural and logistical challenges associated with integrating employees from acquired businesses into our organization;


•	Retaining employees from businesses we acquire;


•	The need to implement or improve internal controls, procedures, and policies appropriate for a public company at businesses that prior to the acquisition may have lacked effective controls, procedures, and policies;


•	Possible write-offs or impairment charges resulting from acquisitions;


•	Unanticipated or unknown liabilities relating to acquired businesses; and


•	The need to integrate acquired businesses’ accounting, management information, manufacturing, human resources, and other administrative systems to permit effective management.

Furthermore, acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations, including a potential adverse impact on our gross margins.

Future acquisitions could result in the need to obtain financing on unfavorable terms, including dilutive equity issuances.

Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, and write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our operating results or financial condition. Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

We are dependent upon our relationships within the entertainment industry, and the failure to maintain such relationships could materially harm our business.

If we fail to maintain and expand our relationships with a broad range of entertainment industry participants, including film studios, broadcasters, video game designers, music producers, mobile media content producers, and OEMs, our business and prospects could be materially harmed. Relationships have historically played an important role in the entertainment markets that we serve. For example, sales of our products and services are particularly dependent upon our relationships with the major film studios and broadcasters, and licensing of our technologies is particularly dependent upon our relationships with system licensees, software vendors, and IC manufacturers. If we fail to maintain and strengthen these relationships, these entertainment industry participants may be less likely to purchase and use our technologies, products, and services, or create content incorporating our technologies, which could materially harm our business and prospects. Additionally, if major entertainment industry participants form strategic relationships that exclude us, whether in licensing, products, or services, our business and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We face diverse risks in our international business, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We are dependent on international sales for a substantial amount of our total revenue. For fiscal 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, revenue from outside the U.S. was 66%, 68%, and 68% of our total revenue,

Table of Contents

respectively. We expect that international and export sales will continue to represent a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. This future revenue will depend to a large extent on the continued use and expansion of our technologies in entertainment industries worldwide.

Due to our reliance on sales to customers outside the U.S., we are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally, including:


•	Our ability to enforce our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in those foreign countries that do not recognize and enforce intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the U.S., Japan, and European countries, which increases the risk of unauthorized, and uncompensated, use of our technologies;


•	U.S. and foreign government trade restrictions, including those which may impose restrictions on importation of programming, technology, or components to or from the U.S.;


•	Our ability to comply with applicable international laws and regulations governing our business and operations, including local consumer and safety laws, as well as license requirements;


•	Foreign government taxes, regulations, and permit requirements, including foreign taxes that we may not be able to offset against taxes imposed upon us in the U.S., and other laws limiting our ability to repatriate funds to the U.S.;


•	Burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;


•	Changes in diplomatic and trade relationships;


•	Difficulty in establishing, staffing, and managing foreign operations;


•	Adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, including risks related to any interest rate swap or other hedging activities we undertake;


•	Political or social instability, natural disasters, war or events of terrorism; and


•	The strength of international economies.

In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. regulations applicable to us such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, distributors, dealers, and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies or these regulations. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face risks associated with complying with international employment laws.

A significant number of our employees are located outside the U.S. This means we have exposure to changes in foreign laws governing our relationships with our employees, which could have a direct impact on our operating costs. Expansion into international markets has required, and will require, significant management attention and resources. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our international operations and could become subject to legal penalties in foreign countries if we do not comply with local employment laws and regulations, which may be substantially different from those in the U.S.

Revisions to patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may adversely impact our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our patent rights.

Our licensing business depends in part on the uniform and consistent treatment of patent rights in the U.S. and abroad. Changes to the patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may limit our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our rights. Additionally, court and administrative rulings may interpret existing patent laws and regulations in ways that adversely affect our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our patents. For example, recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court concerning injunctions may make it more difficult, under some circumstances, for us to obtain injunctive relief against a party that has been found to infringe one or more of our patents, and rulings regarding patent challenges by licensees could potentially make it easier for our licensees to challenge our patents even though they have already agreed to take a license.

Our stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in our stock price.

Our stock repurchase program, whereby we may continue to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock, may reduce the public float of shares available for trading on a daily basis. Such purchases may be limited, suspended, or terminated at any time without prior notice. There can be no assurance that we will buy additional shares of our Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program or that any future repurchases will have a positive impact on our stock price or earnings per share. Important factors that could cause us to discontinue or decrease our share repurchases include, among others, unfavorable market conditions, the market price of our Class A common stock, the nature of other investment or strategic opportunities presented to us from time to time, the rate of dilution of our equity compensation programs, our ability to make appropriate,

Table of Contents

timely, and beneficial decisions as to when, how, and whether to purchase shares under the stock repurchase program, and the availability of funds necessary to continue purchasing stock. If we curtail our repurchase program, our stock price may be negatively affected.

Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to the volatility of the market price of our stock.

A number of factors, many of which are outside our control, may cause or contribute to significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results. These fluctuations may make financial planning and forecasting more difficult. In addition, these fluctuations may result in unanticipated decreases in our available cash, which could negatively impact our business and prospects, and could increase the volatility of our stock price. Factors that may cause or contribute to fluctuations in our operating results and revenue or the volatility of the market price of our stock include those risks set forth in this section as well as the following:


•	Fluctuations in demand for our products and for the digital entertainment products of our licensees;


•	Adverse developments in general economic conditions;


•	The amount and timing of our operating costs, capital expenditures, and related charges, including those related to the expansion or consolidation of our business, operations, and infrastructure;


•	Changes in business cycles that affect the markets in which we sell our products and services or the markets for consumer entertainment products incorporating our technologies;


•	Fluctuations in the timing of royalty reports we receive from our licensees, including late or sporadic reports;


•	Variations in the time-to-market of our technologies in the entertainment industry markets in which we operate;


•	Corrections to licensees’ reports received in periods subsequent to those in which the original revenue was reported;


•	The announcement, introduction, or enhancement of technologies, products, and services, by us, our licensees, and our competitors, and market acceptance of these new or enhanced technologies, products, and services;


•	Rapid, wholesale changes in technology in the entertainment industries in which we compete;


•	Events and conditions in the cinema industry, including box office receipts that affect the number of theaters constructed, the number of movies produced and exhibited, the general popularity of motion pictures, and strikes by cinema industry participants;


•	The financial resources of cinema exhibitors available to buy our products or to equip their theaters to accommodate upgraded or new technologies;


•	Consolidation by participants in the markets in which we compete, which could result among other things in pricing pressure;


•	Seasonal electronics product shipment patterns by our system licensees, particularly in the first quarter, which generally result in revenue in the second quarter;


•	The impact of, and our ability to react to, interruptions in the entertainment distribution process, including as a result of work stoppages at our facilities, our customers’ facilities, and other points throughout the entertainment distribution process;


•	Adverse outcomes of litigation or governmental proceedings, including any foreign, federal, state, or local tax assessments or audits;


•	Repurchases we make of our common stock;


•	Costs of litigation and intellectual property protection;


•	Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies;


•	Variations between our operating results and published analysts’ expectations; and


•	Announcements by our competitors or significant customers.

One or more of the foregoing or other factors may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately higher or lower or may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate significantly in any particular quarterly or annual period. Consequently, results from prior periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of future periods.

Changes in tax rates and exposure for additional income tax liabilities or adverse outcomes resulting from examinations of our tax returns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, the geographic mix of our revenue, or by changes in tax laws or their interpretation could all favorably or unfavorably affect our future effective tax rates. We file income tax returns in the U.S. and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions, and must use judgment in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. For example, the following could adversely affect our income taxes:


•	Earnings being lower than anticipated in countries that have lower tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries that have higher tax rates;

Table of Contents


•	Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;


•	Expiration of or lapses in the R&D tax credit laws;


•	Fluctuations in tax exempt interest income;


•	Transfer pricing adjustments;


•	Tax effects of nondeductible compensation;


•	Tax costs related to intercompany realignments;


•	Changes in accounting principles; or


•	Changes in tax laws and regulations, including possible U.S. changes to the taxation of earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, the deductibility of expenses attributable to foreign income, or the foreign tax credit rules.

We are subject to the periodic examination of our income tax returns by tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance, however, that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, due to the evolving nature of tax rules combined with the large number of jurisdictions in which we operate, it is possible that our estimates of our tax liability and the realizability of our deferred tax assets could change in the future, which may result in additional tax liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us or our industry downgrade our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Any inability to protect our intellectual property rights could reduce the value of our products, services, and brand.

Our business is dependent upon protecting our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. Licensing revenue represented 77%, 83%, and 86% of our total revenue in the fiscal years 2010, 2011, and the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 30, 2012, respectively. Effective intellectual property rights protection, however, may not be available under the laws of every country in which our products and services and those of our licensees are distributed. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete.

In addition, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. We have taken steps in the past to enforce our intellectual property rights and expect to do so in the future. However, it may not be practicable or cost effective for us to enforce our intellectual property rights fully, particularly in some countries or where the initiation of a claim might harm our business relationships. If we are unable to successfully identify and stop unauthorized use of our intellectual property, we could experience increased operational and enforcement costs, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We generally seek patent protection for our innovations. However, it is possible that some of these innovations may not be protectable, or we may choose not to protect particular innovations that later turn out to be important, due to the high costs of obtaining patent protection. Even where we do have patent protection, the scope of such protection may be insufficient to prevent third parties from designing around our particular patent claims. Furthermore, there is always the possibility that an issued patent may later be found to be invalid or unenforceable. We also seek to maintain select intellectual property as trade secrets. Third parties or our employees could intentionally or accidentally compromise the intellectual property that we maintain as trade secrets, which would cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from them.

Our customers who are also our current or potential competitors may choose to use their own or competing technologies rather than ours.

We face competitive risks in situations where our customers are also current or potential competitors. For example, Sony and Microsoft are significant licensee customers and Sony is a significant purchaser of our broadcast products and services, but Sony and Microsoft are also competitors with respect to some of our consumer, broadcast, and cinema technologies. To the extent that our customers choose to use competing technologies they have developed or in which they have an interest, rather than use our technologies, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

We face competition from other audio formats.

We believe that the success we have had licensing our surround sound technologies to system licensees is due, in part, to the strength of our brand and the perception that our technologies provide a high quality solution for surround sound. However, both free and proprietary sound technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent, and we expect competitors to continue to enter this field with other solutions. Furthermore, to the extent that customers perceive our competitors’ solutions to provide the same advantages as our technologies at a lower or comparable price, there is a risk that these customers may treat sound encoding technologies such as ours as commodities, resulting in loss of status of our technologies, decline in their use, and significant pricing pressure. The commoditization of our audio technologies, as opposed to treatment as a premium solution, could adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

The loss of or delay in operations of one or more of our key suppliers could materially delay or stop the production of our products and impair our ability to generate revenue.

Our reliance on outside suppliers for some of the key materials and components we use in manufacturing our products involves risks, including limited control over the price, timely delivery, and quality of such components. We have no formal agreements in place with our suppliers for the continued supply of materials and components. Although we have identified alternate suppliers for most of our key materials and components, any required changes in our suppliers could cause material delays in our production operations and increase our production costs. In addition, at times our suppliers have not been, and in the future may not be, able to meet our production demands as to volume, quality, or timeliness.

Moreover, we rely on sole source suppliers for some of the components that we use to manufacture our products, including specific charged coupled devices, light emitting diodes, and digital signal processors. These sole source suppliers may become unable or unwilling to deliver these components to us at an acceptable cost or at all, which could force us to redesign those specific products.

Our inability to obtain timely delivery of key components of acceptable quality, any significant increases in the prices of components, or the redesign of our products could result in material production delays, increased costs, and reductions in shipments of our products, any of which could increase our operating costs, harm our customer relationships, or materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Revenue from our products may suffer if our production processes encounter problems or if we are not able to match our production capacity to fluctuating levels of demand.

Our products are highly complex and production difficulties or inefficiencies can interrupt production, resulting in our inability to deliver products on time in a cost effective manner, which could harm our competitive position. We have a single production facility and increasingly use contract manufacturers for a significant portion of our production capacity. Our reliance on contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products involves risks, including limited control over timely delivery and quality of such products. If production of our products is interrupted, we may not be able to manufacture products on a timely basis. A shortage of manufacturing capacity for our products could adversely affect our operating results and damage our customer relationships. We are unable to quickly adapt our manufacturing capacity to rapidly changing market conditions and a contract manufacturer may encounter similar difficulties. Likewise, we may be unable to quickly respond to fluctuations in customer demand or contract manufacturer interruptions. At times we underutilize our manufacturing facilities as a result of reduced demand for some of our products. Any inability to effectively respond to fluctuations in customer demand for our products or contract manufacturer interruptions may adversely affect our gross margins.

Our products, from time to time, experience quality problems that can result in decreased sales and higher operating expenses.

Our products are complex and sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. In addition, to the extent that we engage contract manufacturers, we do not have as much control over manufacturing which could result in quality problems. Furthermore, our products are sometimes combined with or incorporated into products from other vendors, sometimes making it difficult to identify the source of a problem. These errors could result in a loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. In addition, if our products contain errors we could be required to replace or reengineer them, which would increase our costs. Moreover, if any such errors cause unintended consequences, we could incur substantial costs in defending and settling product liability claims. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit liability for defective products to the cost of repairing or replacing these products, if these contract provisions are not enforced, or are unenforceable for any reason, or if liabilities arise that are not effectively limited, we could incur substantial costs in defending and settling product liability claims.

Table of Contents

Licensee products that incorporate our technologies, from time to time, experience quality problems that could damage our brand, decrease revenue, and increase operating expenses.

Newly introduced and new versions of licensee products that incorporate our technologies are complex and may contain undetected software or hardware errors. In addition, the combination or incorporation of these newly introduced products with products from other companies can make it difficult to identify the source of a problem. Any negative publicity or negative impact relating to these product problems could adversely affect the perception of our brand. In addition, these errors could result in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of those products or Dolby technologies, or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit our liability for our licensees’ defective products, we may elect to help reengineer those products, which could adversely affect our operating results.

A loss of one or more of our key customers or licensees in any of our markets could adversely affect our operating results.

From time to time, one or a small number of our customers or licensees may represent a significant percentage of our products, services, or licensing revenue. For example, revenue from our largest customer represented approximately 13% of total revenue for fiscal 2011. Although we have agreements with many of these customers, these agreements typically do not require any minimum purchases or minimum royalty fees and do not prohibit customers from purchasing products and services from competitors. A decision by any of our major customers or licensees not to use our technologies, or their failure or inability to pay amounts owed to us in a timely manner, or at all, whether due to strategic redirections or adverse changes in their businesses or for other reasons, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Some of our operations use substances regulated under various federal, state, local, and international laws governing the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management, disposal, and labeling of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur costs, fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims, or could be required to incur substantial investigation or remediation costs, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws. Liability under environmental laws can be joint and several and without regard to comparative fault. The ultimate costs under environmental laws and the timing of these costs are difficult to predict.

New environmental laws and regulations could impact our operating results.

We expect that new environmental laws and regulations, introduced on an ongoing basis, will have the potential to affect our manufacturing and licensing operations. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs or decreased revenue, and could require that we redesign or change how we manufacture our products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We could incur substantial costs due to regulations regarding the composition of our products, which may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the materials composition of our products. For example, we redesigned our products so we could continue to offer them for sale within the European Union, when restrictions on lead and other hazardous substances that apply to specified electronic products put on the market in the European Union became effective in 2006. Similar requirements related to marking of electronic products became effective in China in 2007. For some products, substituting particular components containing regulated hazardous substances is more difficult or costly, and additional redesign efforts could result in production delays. Selected electronic products that we maintain in inventory may be rendered obsolete if not in compliance with the new environmental laws, which could negatively impact our ability to generate revenue from those products.

Continued global credit market weakness could negatively impact the value and liquidity of our investment portfolio.

We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities, including money market funds, U.S. treasury and agency securities, municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Although we follow an established investment policy and seek to minimize the credit risk associated with investments, these investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, and interest rate risks. Any downgrades, losses, or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash, cash equivalents, or investments could negatively impact our investments or our ability to meet our investment objectives. Such negative impact, should it arise, could require an impairment charge, which would adversely impact our financial results.

Table of Contents

We face risks associated with international trade and currency exchange.

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries. Consequently, we are exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates associated with the local currencies of our foreign business operations. While we derive nearly all of our revenue from transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, nearly all of our costs from our foreign operations are denominated in the currency of that foreign location. Consequently, exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could have a material impact on our profitability.

We rely on distributors that we do not control.

We rely significantly on a global network of independent, regional distributors to market and distribute our cinema and broadcast products. Our distributor arrangements are non-exclusive and our distributors are not obligated to buy our products and can represent competing products. The loss of a major distributor or the inability or unwillingness of our distributors to dedicate the resources necessary to promote our portfolio of products could adversely affect our revenue. Furthermore, our distributors could retain product channel inventory levels that exceed future anticipated sales, which could adversely affect future sales to those distributors. In addition, failures of our distributors to adhere to our policies or other ethical practices could adversely affect us. For example, while we have implemented policies designed to promote compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export controls, and local laws, we do not have direct control over the business and risk management policies adopted by our distributors, and they could act contrary to our policies.

For the foreseeable future, Ray Dolby or his affiliates will be able to control the selection of all members of our board of directors, as well as virtually every other matter that requires stockholder approval, which will severely limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters.

At March 30, 2012, Ray Dolby and his affiliates owned 100 shares of our Class A common stock and 57,034,000 shares of our Class B common stock. As of March 30, 2012, Ray Dolby and his affiliates, including his family members, had voting power of approximately 99.7% of our outstanding Class B common stock, which in the aggregate represented approximately 91.7% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. Under our certificate of incorporation, holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share while holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Generally, shares of Class B common stock automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock upon transfer of such Class B common stock, other than transfers to certain specified persons and entities, including the spouse and descendants of Ray Dolby and the spouses and domestic partners of such descendants.

Because of this dual class structure, Ray Dolby, his affiliates, and his family members and descendants will, for the foreseeable future, have significant influence over our management and affairs, and will be able to control virtually all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions such as mergers or other sales of our company or assets, even if they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. Ray Dolby, his affiliates, his family members, and descendants will maintain this control even if in the future they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock.

Moreover, these persons may take actions in their own interests that our stockholders do not view as beneficial. Absent a transfer of Class B common stock that would trigger an automatic conversion as described above, there is no threshold or time deadline at which the shares of Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock.

Assuming conversion of all shares of Class B common stock held by persons not affiliated with Ray Dolby into shares of Class A common stock, so long as Ray Dolby and his affiliates, his family members, and descendants continue to hold shares of Class B common stock representing approximately 10% or more of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, they will hold a majority of the combined voting power of the Class A and Class B common stock.

Future sales of shares by insiders could cause our stock price to decline.

If our founder, officers, directors or employees sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, including shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Class B common stock, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. As previously announced, Ray Dolby as Trustee of the Ray Dolby Trust under the Dolby Family Trust Instrument dated May 7, 1999 adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to sell a total of up to 3 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock (or approximately 5.1% of Ray Dolby’s direct and indirect holdings at the time) in compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Sales under the trading plan commenced in May 2011 are based on pre-established stock price thresholds, and are subject to daily volume limits. The trading plan will expire once all of the shares have been sold or on May 31, 2012, whichever is earlier. We cannot predict the effect the trading plan sales may have on the future trading prices of

Table of Contents

our Class A common stock. As of March 30, 2012, we had a total of 107,468,383 shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding. Of these shares, 31,625,000 shares of Class A common stock were sold in our initial public offering by us and the selling stockholders, and an additional 8,000,000 shares of Class A common stock were sold in a secondary offering in May 2007 by our principal stockholder.

As of March 30, 2012, our directors and executive officers beneficially held 57,044,000 shares of Class B common stock, 184,299 shares of Class A common stock, vested options to purchase 20,000 shares of Class B common stock and vested options to purchase 763,937 shares of Class A common stock. We expect that any sale of our Class A common stock by our directors and executive officers would be subject to compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Sales of Unregistered Securities

In the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 23,060 shares of our Class B common stock to certain employees, officers, and directors upon the exercise of options awarded under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. We received aggregate proceeds of less than $0.1 million in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012, as a result of the exercise of these options. We believe these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 thereunder as transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701. As of March 30, 2012, options to purchase an aggregate of 231,284 shares of our Class B common stock remain outstanding. All issuances of shares of our Class B common stock pursuant to the exercise of these options will be made in reliance on Rule 701. All option grants made under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan were made prior to the effectiveness of our initial public offering. No further option grants will be made under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering.

Each share of our Class B common stock is convertible into one share of our Class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder or upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock. In addition, each share of Class B common stock shall convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon any transfer, except for certain transfers described in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s purchases of its Class A Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, during the second quarter of fiscal 2012:



	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3)
December 31, 2011 - January 27, 2012	83,805	$	33.56	83,805	$ 337.5 million
January 28, 2012 - February 24, 2012	390,580	38.81		390,580	422.3 million
February 25, 2012 - March 30, 2012	1,101,506	38.21		1,101,506	380.2 million
Total	1,575,891			1,575,891


(1)	Excludes commission costs.

(2)

Shares of Class A common stock were purchased under a $250.0 million stock repurchase program announced on November 3, 2009, which was subsequently increased by $300.0 million, $250.0 million, and $100.0 million announced on July 27, 2010, August 4, 2011, and February 8, 2012, respectively. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in such amounts as we consider appropriate.


(3)	Amounts shown in this column reflect amounts remaining under the stock repurchase program.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



		Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	Date

10.1*	Consulting Agreement by and between David Dolby and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
10.2*	Summary of Murray Demo Fiscal 2012 Cash Incentive Arrangement
10.3*	Offer Letter dated March 22, 2012, by and between Lewis Chew and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
31.1	Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1‡	Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS‡	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF‡	XBRL Extension Definition
101.LAB‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Denotes a management contract or compensatory arrangement

‡ Furnished herewith

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 8, 2012




	DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

	By:		/s/ Murray J. Demo
			Murray J. Demo
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting
			Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)