AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
136,544 |
|
|
$ |
132,920 |
|
|
$ |
245,562 |
|
|
$ |
278,922 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(101,213 |
) |
|
|
(96,370 |
) |
|
|
(180,785 |
) |
|
|
(207,451 |
) |
Gross profit
|
|
|
35,331 |
|
|
|
36,550 |
|
|
|
64,777 |
|
|
|
71,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(24,138 |
) |
|
|
(25,877 |
) |
|
|
(51,400 |
) |
|
|
(52,285 |
) |
Other income, net
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
2,902 |
|
Income before interest, income taxes and equity in loss of affiliate
|
|
|
12,162 |
|
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
Income before income taxes and equity in loss of affiliate
|
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
|
12,956 |
|
|
|
14,476 |
|
|
|
21,769 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
|
(4,619 |
) |
Income before equity in loss of affiliate
|
|
|
9,958 |
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
11,817 |
|
|
|
17,150 |
|
Equity in loss of affiliate, net of taxes
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,549 |
|
|
$ |
9,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
13,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share allocated to Common Stock (see Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares (basic)
|
|
|
9,205,970 |
|
|
|
9,171,645 |
|
|
|
9,191,676 |
|
|
|
9,159,161 |
|
Weighted-average shares (diluted)
|
|
|
9,218,234 |
|
|
|
9,185,143 |
|
|
|
9,209,129 |
|
|
|
9,172,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – ASSETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
153,351 |
|
|
$ |
181,114 |
|
Receivables, less allowances of $4,589 in 2010 and $5,351 in 2009
|
|
|
155,171 |
|
|
|
151,210 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
70,865 |
|
|
|
62,700 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,814 |
|
|
|
19,795 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
12,870 |
|
|
|
11,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
411,071 |
|
|
|
426,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method affiliate
|
|
|
27,841 |
|
|
|
30,626 |
|
Cost method affiliates
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
45,662 |
|
|
|
46,029 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
100,856 |
|
|
|
100,583 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
348,573 |
|
|
|
345,604 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
36,958 |
|
|
|
32,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment at cost
|
|
|
532,049 |
|
|
|
524,522 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(291,440 |
) |
|
|
(286,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
240,609 |
|
|
|
238,508 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14,320 |
|
|
|
14,321 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,269 in 2010 and $1,257 in 2009
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
46,521 |
|
|
|
46,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
746,216 |
|
|
$ |
762,549 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
7,263 |
|
|
$ |
7,366 |
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
45,933 |
|
|
|
44,052 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
69,614 |
|
|
|
77,515 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
10,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
131,848 |
|
|
|
138,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
31,874 |
|
|
|
30,933 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
90,764 |
|
|
|
99,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
256,195 |
|
|
|
270,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share, authorized 24,000,000 shares, outstanding 9,246,355 shares in 2010 and 9,209,836 shares in 2009
|
|
|
30,045 |
|
|
|
29,920 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
60,395 |
|
|
|
59,531 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
505,299 |
|
|
|
500,224 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(48,649 |
) |
|
|
(42,036 |
) |
Treasury Stock (2,771,637 shares in 2010 and 2,758,356 shares in 2009)
|
|
|
(57,069 |
) |
|
|
(56,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
490,021 |
|
|
|
491,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
746,216 |
|
|
$ |
762,549 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(Dollars In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
13,252 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
12,714 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Loss from affiliate
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
4,313 |
|
(Gain)/loss from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
|
|
45,120 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(9,356 |
) |
|
|
15,873 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
Other assets
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
Trade payables
|
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
(7,675 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and income taxes payable
|
|
|
(8,226 |
) |
|
|
(3,637 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(8,325 |
) |
|
|
(1,221 |
) |
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(4,129 |
) |
|
|
78,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(16,756 |
) |
|
|
(26,471 |
) |
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Loan to affiliate, net
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,076 |
) |
|
|
(36,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of debt
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
Dividends on Common Stock
|
|
|
(5,557 |
) |
|
|
(5,521 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
819 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(992 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(5,182 |
) |
|
|
(5,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,376 |
) |
|
|
4,581 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(27,763 |
) |
|
|
42,019 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
181,114 |
|
|
|
143,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
153,351 |
|
|
$ |
185,580 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein are unaudited; however, such financial statements contain all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of Management, are necessary for the fair statement of the consolidated financial position of Ameron International Corporation and all subsidiaries (the "Company" or "Ameron" or the "Registrant") as of May 30, 2010, and consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended May 30, 2010 and cash flows for the six months ended May 30, 2010. Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. Results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
For accounting consistency, the quarter typically ends on the Sunday closest to the end of the relevant calendar month. The Company’s fiscal year ends on November 30, regardless of the day of the week. Each quarter consists of approximately 13 weeks, but the number of days per quarter can change from period to period. The quarters ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009 each consisted of 91 days. The six months ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009 consisted of 181 days and 182 days, respectively.
The consolidated financial statements do not include certain footnote disclosures and financial information normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009 ("2009 Annual Report").
NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance requiring unvested instruments granted in share-based payment transactions that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents to be accounted for as participating securities subject to the two-class method of computing earnings per share. All earnings per share data for periods prior to adoption are required to be adjusted retrospectively. The Company adopted the guidance as of December 1, 2009, and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 7 for a reconciliation of net income allocated to Common Stock using the two-class method.
In December 2008, the FASB issued revised guidance for employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The FASB requires an employer to disclose investment policies and strategies, categories, fair value measurements, and significant concentration of risk among its postretirement benefit plan assets. The Company will adopt the revised guidance as of November 30, 2010. Adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance to revise the approach to determine when a variable interest entity (“VIE”) should be consolidated. The new consolidation model for VIE’s considers whether the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and shares in the significant risks and rewards of the entity. The guidance on VIE’s requires companies to continually reassess VIE’s to determine if consolidation is appropriate and provide additional disclosures. The Company adopted the guidance as of December 1, 2009, and adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB required new disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim and annual reporting periods. These new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 financial instruments, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 3 – RECEIVABLES
The Company’s receivables consisted of the following:
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Trade
|
|
$ |
128,066 |
|
|
$ |
121,822 |
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Other
|
|
|
30,232 |
|
|
|
33,779 |
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(4,589 |
) |
|
|
(5,351 |
) |
|
|
$ |
155,171 |
|
|
$ |
151,210 |
|
Trade receivables included unbilled receivables related to percentage-of-completion revenue recognition of $28,620,000 and $33,705,000 at May 30, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 4 – INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$ |
30,288 |
|
|
$ |
30,100 |
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
28,358 |
|
|
|
22,952 |
|
Products in process
|
|
|
12,219 |
|
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
$ |
70,865 |
|
|
$ |
62,700 |
|
NOTE 5 – SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information included the following:
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
5,497 |
|
NOTE 6 – AFFILIATES
Operating results of TAMCO, an investment which is accounted for under the equity method, were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
27,169 |
|
|
$ |
22,460 |
|
|
$ |
46,291 |
|
|
$ |
40,257 |
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(11,278 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(3,442 |
) |
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
|
(8,626 |
) |
Investments in Ameron Saudi Arabia, Ltd. ("ASAL") and Bondstrand, Ltd. ("BL") are accounted for under the cost method due to Management's current assessment of the Company's influence over these affiliates. Earnings from ASAL and BL, if any, are included in other income, net.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Earnings and dividends from the Company's affiliates were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Earnings from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of TAMCO before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(443 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,721 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,285 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,313 |
) |
Less benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
Equity in loss of TAMCO, net of taxes
|
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,555 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,185 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,898 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAMCO
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
ASAL
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
BL
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
No dividends were received from affiliates during the first half of 2010 and $2,207,000 was received in the first half of 2009. In 2009, TAMCO entered into a senior secured credit facility with TAMCO’s shareholders which provided TAMCO up to $40,000,000. The shareholder credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and is scheduled to mature January 31, 2011. As of November 30, 2009, TAMCO borrowed $30,000,000 under the facility, of which $15,000,000 was provided by the Company. As of May 30, 2010, TAMCO’s usage of the facility totaled $27,000,000, of which $13,500,000 was borrowed from the Company. The Company continues to have a 50% ownership interest in TAMCO.
NOTE 7 – NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic and diluted net income per share are computed using the two-class method which allocates earnings to both Common Stock and participating securities. Under the two-class method, unvested restricted Common Stock with non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities. Dividends from such participating securities are excluded from net income allocated to Common Stock for purposes of the two-class method calculation.
Basic shares are computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted shares are computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock using the treasury stock method. Stock options and restricted stock of 19,286 and 45,138 are excluded from the below calculation for the quarters and six months ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009, respectively, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Following is a reconciliation of net income allocated to Common Stock, using the two-class method, and the weighted-average number of shares used in the computation of basic and diluted net income per share allocated to Common Stock:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,549 |
|
|
$ |
9,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
13,252 |
|
Less: net income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Net income allocated to Common Stock
|
|
|
9,504 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
10,582 |
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
9,205,970 |
|
|
|
9,171,645 |
|
|
|
9,191,676 |
|
|
|
9,159,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
9,205,970 |
|
|
|
9,171,645 |
|
|
|
9,191,676 |
|
|
|
9,159,161 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
12,264 |
|
|
|
13,498 |
|
|
|
17,453 |
|
|
|
13,309 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
9,218,234 |
|
|
|
9,185,143 |
|
|
|
9,209,129 |
|
|
|
9,172,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share allocated to Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
NOTE 8 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,549 |
|
|
$ |
9,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
13,252 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,895 |
) |
|
|
13,884 |
|
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
10,482 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
7,654 |
|
|
$ |
23,310 |
|
|
$ |
4,019 |
|
|
$ |
23,734 |
|
NOTE 9 – DEBT
The Company's long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Fixed-rate notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25%, payable in Singapore dollars, in annual principal installments of $7,263
|
|
$ |
21,789 |
|
|
$ |
22,098 |
|
Variable-rate industrial development bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payable in 2016 (.55% at May 30, 2010)
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
payable in 2021 (.55% at May 30, 2010)
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Variable-rate bank revolving credit facility (5.59% at May 30, 2010)
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
39,137 |
|
|
|
38,299 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(7,263 |
) |
|
|
(7,366 |
) |
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
$ |
31,874 |
|
|
$ |
30,933 |
|
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Company maintains a $100,000,000 revolving credit facility with a syndicate of six banks (the “Revolver”). Under the Revolver, the Company may, at its option, borrow up to the available amount at floating interest rates (LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 2.75% to 3.75%, based on the Company's financial condition and performance) or utilize the facility for letters of credit at a similar spread at any time until maturity in August 2012 when all borrowings under the Revolver must be repaid and letters of credit cancelled. At May 30, 2010, $17,312,000 of the Revolver was utilized for standby letters of credit; therefore, $82,688,000 was available under the Revolver.
Foreign subsidiaries also maintain unsecured revolving credit facilities with banks. Foreign subsidiaries may borrow in various currencies at interest rates based upon specified margins over money market rates. Existing foreign credit facilities permit borrowings of up to $25,717,000. At May 30, 2010, $1,648,000 was borrowed under these facilities.
The Company’s lending agreements contain various restrictive covenants, including the requirement to maintain specified amounts of net worth and restrictions on cash dividends, borrowings, liens, capital expenditures, investments, guarantees, and financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of May 30, 2010. The Revolver and the 4.25% term notes are collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. The industrial development bonds are supported by standby letters of credit that are issued under the Revolver. The interest rate on the industrial development bonds is based on the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) Index plus a spread of .20%. Certain note agreements contain provisions regarding the Company's ability to grant security interests or liens in association with other debt instruments. If the Company grants such a security interest or lien, then such notes will be collateralized equally and ratably as long as such other debt shall be collateralized.
Estimated fair value of the Company's debt is prepared in accordance with FASB’s fair value disclosure requirements. These requirements establish a framework for measuring the fair value of financial instruments including a disclosure hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The estimated fair value amounts were determined by the Company using available market information and various valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimated fair value, thus the estimates provided herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
May 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate, long-term debt
|
|
$ |
21,789 |
|
|
$ |
22,427 |
|
Variable-rate, long-term debt
|
|
|
17,348 |
|
|
|
17,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate, long-term debt
|
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
22,741 |
|
Variable-rate, long-term debt
|
|
|
16,201 |
|
|
|
16,201 |
|
The Company used a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, optionality and risk profile to determine fair value. The estimated fair value of the Company's fixed-rate, long-term debt is based on U.S. government notes at the respective date plus an estimated spread for similar securities with similar credit risks and remaining maturities.
NOTE 10 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has determined that it has four operating and three reportable segments: Fiberglass-Composite Pipe, Water Transmission and Infrastructure Products. Infrastructure Products consists of two operating segments, the Pole Products and Hawaii Divisions, which are aggregated. Each of the segments has a dedicated management team and is managed separately, primarily because of differences in products. TAMCO is not included in any of these segments. The Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker is the Chief Executive Officer who primarily reviews sales and income before interest, income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliate for each operating segment in making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance. The Company allocates certain selling, general and administrative expenses to operating segments utilizing assumptions believed to be appropriate in the circumstances. Costs of certain shared services (e.g., costs of Company-wide insurance programs or benefit plans) are allocated to the operating segments based on revenue, wages or net assets employed. Other items not related to current operations or of an unusual nature are not allocated to the reportable segments, such as adjustments to reflect inventory balances of certain steel inventories under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method, certain unusual legal costs and expenses, interest expense and income taxes.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Following is information related to each reportable segment included in, and in a manner consistent with, internal management reports:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
|
|
$ |
64,668 |
|
|
$ |
55,532 |
|
|
$ |
119,174 |
|
|
$ |
112,273 |
|
Water Transmission
|
|
|
41,288 |
|
|
|
42,251 |
|
|
|
67,100 |
|
|
|
93,794 |
|
Infrastructure Products
|
|
|
30,612 |
|
|
|
35,147 |
|
|
|
59,318 |
|
|
|
72,866 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Total Sales
|
|
$ |
136,544 |
|
|
$ |
132,920 |
|
|
$ |
245,562 |
|
|
$ |
278,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Interest, Income Taxes and Equity in Loss of Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
|
|
$ |
17,779 |
|
|
$ |
16,490 |
|
|
$ |
31,830 |
|
|
$ |
31,136 |
|
Water Transmission
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
Infrastructure Products
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
Corporate and unallocated
|
|
|
(8,239 |
) |
|
|
(8,627 |
) |
|
|
(18,896 |
) |
|
|
(18,586 |
) |
Total Income Before Interest, Income Taxes and Equity in Loss of Affiliate
|
|
$ |
12,162 |
|
|
$ |
13,104 |
|
|
$ |
14,888 |
|
|
$ |
22,088 |
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe
|
|
$ |
318,813 |
|
|
$ |
314,980 |
|
Water Transmission
|
|
|
196,399 |
|
|
|
191,981 |
|
Infrastructure Products
|
|
|
94,183 |
|
|
|
95,311 |
|
Corporate and unallocated
|
|
|
318,178 |
|
|
|
307,071 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(181,357 |
) |
|
|
(146,794 |
) |
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
746,216 |
|
|
$ |
762,549 |
|
NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In April 2004, Sable Offshore Energy Inc. ("Sable"), as agent for certain owners of the Sable Offshore Energy Project, brought an action against various coatings suppliers and application contractors, including the Company and its subsidiary, Ameron B.V., in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada. Sable seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from performance problems with several coating systems used on the Sable Offshore Energy Project, including coatings products furnished by the Company and Ameron B.V. All of the co-defendants, other than the Company, Ameron B.V. and an unaffiliated licensee of the Company, have since settled. Sable's originating notice and statement of claim alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified amount. Sable later then alleged that its claim for damages against all defendants was approximately 440,000,000 Canadian dollars. More recently, however, Sable sent the Company a revised claim which included an alternative method for calculating damages. Although Sable did not specify a claim amount under its alternative method, that method if adopted would appear to substantially reduce the amount of damages. Nonetheless, the Company contests any claim amount and is vigorously defending itself on the merits in this action. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
In May 2003, Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (collectively "Dominion") brought an action against the Company in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana as owners of an offshore production facility known as a SPAR. Dominion sought damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from delays in delivery of the SPAR caused by the removal and replacement of certain coatings containing lead and/or lead chromate for which the manufacturer of the SPAR alleged the Company was responsible. Dominion contended that the Company made certain misrepresentations and warranties to Dominion concerning the lead-free nature of those coatings. Settlement has now been reached regarding the Dominion litigation pursuant to a settlement agreement which was executed during the second quarter of 2010. No payment by the Company is required as part of the settlement. The terms of the settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations in the second quarter and are not expected to have a material effect on its results of operation in the future.
In July 2004, BP America Production Company (“BP America”) brought an action against the Company in the 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, Louisiana in connection with fiberglass pipe sold by the Company for installation in four offshore platforms constructed for BP America. The plaintiff seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from claimed defects in such pipe. BP America’s petition as filed alleged a claim against the Company for rescission, products liability, negligence, breach of contract and warranty and for damages in an amount of not less than $20,000,000; but BP America has since reduced its claim to $12,900,000. The Company contests this amount. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In June 2006, the Cawelo, California Water District (“Cawelo”) brought an action against the Company in Kern County Superior Court, California in connection with concrete pipe sold by the Company in 1995 for a wastewater recovery pipeline in such county. Cawelo seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from the failure of such pipe in 2004. Cawelo’s petition as filed alleged a claim against the Company for products liability, negligence, breach of express warranty and breach of written contract and for damages in an amount of not less than $8,000,000, a figure which the Company contests. This matter is in discovery, and trial is currently scheduled to commence on January 24, 2011. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
The Company is a defendant in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by the Company and others. As of May 30, 2010, the Company was a defendant in 17 asbestos-related cases, compared to 22 cases as of February 28, 2010. During the quarter ended May 30, 2010, there was one new asbestos-related case, five cases dismissed, one case settled, no judgments or recovery; and expenses totaled $16,000. In the six months ended May 30, 2010, the Company recovered $36,000, net of expenses. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to these cases.
In December 2008, the Company received from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) a Requirement to Furnish Information regarding transactions involving Iran. The Company has cooperated fully with OFAC on this matter. With the assistance of outside counsel, the Company conducted an internal inquiry and responded to OFAC. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to predict the outcome of this matter. If the Company violated governmental regulations, material fines and penalties could be imposed.
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the environment and is currently participating in administrative proceedings at several sites under these laws. While the Company finds it difficult to estimate with any certainty the total cost of remediation at the several sites, on the basis of currently available information and reserves provided, the Company believes that the outcome of such environmental regulatory proceedings will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.
In addition, certain other claims, suits and complaints that arise in the ordinary course of business have been filed or are pending against the Company. Management believes that these matters are either adequately reserved, covered by insurance, or would not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations if disposed of unfavorably.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 12 – PRODUCT WARRANTIES AND GUARANTEES
The Company's product warranty accrual reflects Management's estimate of probable liability associated with product warranties. The Company generally provides a standard product warranty covering defects for a period not exceeding one year from date of purchase. Management establishes product warranty accruals based on historical experience and other currently-available information. Changes in the product warranty accrual were as follows:
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
3,396 |
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
Warranties issued during the period
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,945 |
|
NOTE 13 – INCENTIVE STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
As of May 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding grants under the following share-based compensation plans:
· 2001 Stock Incentive Plan ("2001 Plan") - The 2001 Plan was terminated in 2004, except as to the outstanding stock options and restricted stock grants. Prior to termination, a total of 380,000 new shares of Common Stock were made available for awards to key employees and non-employee directors. Non-employee directors were granted options under the 2001 Plan to purchase the Company's Common Stock at prices not less than 100% of market value on the date of grant. Such options vested in equal annual installments over four years. Such options terminate ten years from the date of grant.
· 2004 Stock Incentive Plan ("2004 Plan") - The 2004 Plan serves as the successor to the 2001 Plan and supersedes that plan. A total of 525,000 new shares of Common Stock were made available for awards to key employees and non-employee directors and may include, but are not limited to, stock options and restricted stock grants. Non-employee directors were granted options under the 2004 Plan to purchase the Company's Common Stock at prices not less than 100% of market value on the date of grant. Such options vest in equal annual installments over four years and terminate ten years from the date of grant. Key employees and non-employee directors were granted restricted stock under the 2004 Plan. Such restricted stock grants typically vest in equal annual installments over three years. During the six months ended May 30, 2010, the Company granted 11,500 restricted shares to key employees with a fair value on the grant date of $781,000 and 10,800 restricted shares to non-employee directors with a fair value on the grant date of $684,000. During the six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company granted 16,200 restricted shares to key employees with a fair value on the grant date of $806,000 and 12,000 restricted shares to non-employee directors with a fair value on the grant date of $575,000. In 2007, the Company agreed to provide to a key employee 18,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted and fully vested each February of 2009 and 2010. The fair value of those shares on the date promised was $3,597,000. Additionally, in April 2010, the key employee was issued 8,000 shares with a market value of $506,000 related to performance stock units granted in 2007.
In addition to the above, in 2001, non-employee directors were granted options to purchase the Company's Common Stock at prices not less than 100% of market value on the date of grant. Such options vested in equal annual installments over four years and terminate ten years from the date of grant. At May 30, 2010, there were 4,000 shares subject to such stock options.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Company's income before income taxes and equity in loss of affiliate for the three months ended May 30, 2010 included compensation expense of $806,000, related to stock-based compensation arrangements, compared to $1,347,000 in 2009. Tax benefit related to this expense was $314,000 in 2010, compared to $525,000 in 2009. For the six months ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009, compensation expenses were $1,433,000 and $2,362,000, respectively, related to stock-based compensation arrangements. Tax benefits related to these expenses were $559,000 and $921,000, respectively. There were no capitalized share-based compensation costs for the three and six months ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009.
The Company recognized a tax deficiency of $689,000 in the six months ended May 30, 2010 and an excess tax benefit of $819,000 in the six months ended May 31, 2009, each related to stock-based compensation.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the six months ended May 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at November 30, 2009
|
|
|
36,302 |
|
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
|
|
29.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at May 30, 2010
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
41.02 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at May 30, 2010
|
|
|
23,901 |
|
|
|
36.23 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
In the six months ended May 30, 2010, 10,500 options were exercised and no options were granted, forfeited, or expired. In the three months ended May 30, 2010 and the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, no options were granted, exercised, forfeited or expired. The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value, which is the difference between the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the last trading day of the second quarter of 2010 and the exercise price times the number of shares that would have been received by the option holders if they exercised their options on May 30, 2010. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock.
As of May 30, 2010, there was $1,579,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years.
In the three and six months ended May 30, 2010, 10,800 and 22,300 shares of restricted stock were granted, respectively. The weighted-average, grant-date fair value of such stock was $63.31 and $65.67, respectively. The fair value of vested restricted stock and granted promised stock, for the three and six months ended May 30, 2010 was $1,146,000 and $3,381,000, respectively. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, 12,000 and 28,200 shares of restricted stock were granted. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of such restricted stock was $47.90 and $49.29 per share, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock, which vested during the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, was $326,000 and $2,678,000, respectively. In the six months ended May 30, 2010, 6,000 shares of restricted stock were forfeited with a fair value of $286,000.
Net cash proceeds from stock options exercised in the six months ended May 30, 2010 were $306,000. The Company's policy is to issue shares from its authorized shares upon the exercise of stock options.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 14 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
For the three and six months ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009, net pension and postretirement costs were comprised of the following:
Employee Benefit Plans (Three Months Ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plan
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
964 |
|
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
|
(3,442 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Amortization of accumulated loss
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net periodic cost adjustment to retained earnings, pre-tax
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
$ |
3,747 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
Employee Benefit Plans (Six Months Ended May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plan
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5,702 |
) |
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Amortization of accumulated loss
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net periodic cost adjustment to retained earnings, pre-tax
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
$ |
7,494 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
The Company contributed $12,000,000 to its U.S. pension plan and $2,389,000 to its non-U.S. pension plans in the first six months of 2010. The Company expects to contribute an additional $1,100,000 to its U.S. pension plan and $134,000 to its non-U.S. pension plans during the remainder of 2010.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 15 – OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Other long-term liabilities were as follows:
|
|
May 30,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits cost
|
|
$ |
78,310 |
|
|
$ |
86,568 |
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
9,974 |
|
|
|
9,974 |
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
Other
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
$ |
90,764 |
|
|
$ |
99,379 |
|
NOTE 16 – PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
Income taxes decreased to $1,899,000 in the second quarter of 2010, from $ 1,975,000 in the same period of 2009. Income taxes decreased to $2,659,000 in the first six months of 2010, from $4,619,000 in the comparable period in 2009. The effective rate in 2010 was reduced by tax benefits recorded in the second quarter of 2010, including a $599,000 decrease in the valuation allowance against deferred assets related to delayed bonuses and restricted stock and a $361,000 decrease in current taxes payable related to the same issue. These decreases represented correction of amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. The effective rate in 2009 was reduced by tax benefits of $1,476,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2009 of which $1,199,000 was associated with an adjustment to a deferred tax liability related to earnings and profits from the Company’s New Zealand subsidiary and $277,000 was related to a decrease in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses of the Company’s Netherlands subsidiary. The $1,199,000 represented a correction of an amount recorded in prior period financial statements. Management believes these corrections to be immaterial to prior annual financial statements and prior and current interim financial statements. The effective tax rate for the first six months decreased to 18.0% in 2010, from 21.0% in 2009. The effective tax rates for the first six months of 2010 and 2009 were based on forecasted full-year earnings and the anticipated mix of domestic and foreign earnings. Income from certain foreign operations is taxed at rates that are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2010 is not indicative of the tax rate for the full fiscal year.
At May 30, 2010, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, was $10,009,000. This amount is not reduced for offsetting benefits in other tax jurisdictions and for the benefit of future tax deductions that would arise as a result of settling such liabilities as recorded. Of this amount, $5,060,000 would reduce the Company’s income tax expense and effective tax rate, after giving effect to offsetting benefits from other tax jurisdictions and resulting future deductions. At November 30, 2009, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, was $9,230,000.
The Company anticipates it is reasonably possible the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change within the succeeding 12 months as a result of the expiration of certain state statutes of limitations for examination and the settlement of certain state audits. The Company estimates these events could reasonably result in a possible decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of $689,000.
The Company accrues interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. Accruals totaling $1,209,000 were recorded as a liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at May 30, 2010, compared to $1,030,000 as of November 30, 2009.
The Company’s federal income tax returns remain subject to examination for the 2007 and forward tax years. The Company files multiple state income tax returns, including California, Hawaii, Arizona and Texas, with open statutes for all years from 2005. The Company also files multiple foreign income tax returns and remains subject to examination in major foreign jurisdictions, including the Netherlands, Singapore and Malaysia, for all years from 2002.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 17 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that the Company believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.
The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company is able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.
A fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). Level 2 measurements utilize observable inputs in markets other than active markets.
Assets and/or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following as of May 30, 2010:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
At Fair Value
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Assets and/or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following as of May 31, 2009:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
At Fair Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Derivatives
The Company and its subsidiaries complete transactions in currencies other than their functional currencies. The Company’s primary objective with respect to currency risk is to reduce net income volatility that would otherwise occur due to exchange-rate fluctuations. In order to minimize the risk of gain or loss due to exchange rates, the Company may from time to time use foreign currency derivatives. As of May 30, 2010, the Company held one foreign currency forward contract in the amount of $2,000,000 U.S. dollars, hedging Singapore dollars, and one contract aggregating $1,270,000, hedging Malaysian Ringgit, and one contract in the amount of $365,000 U.S. dollars, hedging Euros. As of May 31, 2009, the Company held one foreign currency forward contract totaling $3,000,000 U.S. dollars, hedging Singapore dollars. Such instruments had a combined fair value loss of $73,000 and a fair value gain of $3,000 as of May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009, respectively, based on quotations from financial institutions. Derivatives are recorded as receivables and or liabilities on the balance sheet, and the related gains and losses are recognized as other income, net, on the income statement.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
Ameron International Corporation ("Ameron", the "Company", the “Registrant” or the “Corporation”) is a multinational manufacturer of highly-engineered products and materials for the chemical, industrial, energy, transportation and infrastructure markets. Ameron is a leading producer of water transmission lines; fiberglass-composite pipe for transporting oil, chemicals and corrosive fluids and specialized materials; and products used in infrastructure projects. The Company operates businesses in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. The Company has three reportable segments. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group manufactures and markets filament-wound and molded composite fiberglass pipe, tubing, fittings and well screens. The Water Transmission Group manufactures and supplies concrete and steel pressure pipe, concrete non-pressure pipe, protective linings for pipe and fabricated steel products, such as large-diameter wind towers. The Infrastructure Products Group consists of two operating segments, which are aggregated: the Hawaii Division which manufactures and sells ready-mix concrete, sand, aggregates, concrete pipe and culverts and the Pole Products Division which manufactures and sells concrete and steel lighting and traffic poles. The markets served by the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group are worldwide in scope. The Water Transmission Group serves primarily the western U.S. for pipe and sells wind towers primarily west of the Mississippi river. The Infrastructure Products Group's quarry and ready-mix business operates exclusively in Hawaii, and poles are sold throughout the U.S. Ameron also has partial ownership of several affiliated companies, directly in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, and indirectly in Egypt.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources and Results of Operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires Management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities during the reporting periods. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management believes that certain accounting policies affect the more significant estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. A summary of these policies is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) under Part II, Item 7 of the Company's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of May 30, 2010, the Company's working capital, including cash and cash equivalents and current portion of long-term debt, totaled $279.2 million, a decrease of $8.3 million from working capital of $287.5 million as of November 30, 2009. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in cash and cash equivalents partially offset by an increase in receivables and inventories and a decrease in accrued liabilities. The growth in receivables and inventories was due to increased business activity. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $153.4 million as of May 30, 2010, compared to $181.1 million as of November 30, 2009. The reduction in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to contributions to the Company’s pension plans and payment of accrued liabilities.
For the six months ended May 30, 2010, net cash of $4.1 million was used in operating activities, compared to $78.7 million generated in the similar period in 2009. In the six months ended May 30, 2010, the Company's cash used in operating activities included net income of $10.6 million, plus non-cash adjustments (depreciation, amortization, loss from affiliate and stock compensation expense) of $15.4 million, reduced by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $30.2 million. In the six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company's cash provided by operating activities included net income of $13.3 million, plus non-cash adjustments (depreciation, amortization, loss from affiliate and stock compensation expense) of $17.4 million, plus changes in operating assets and liabilities of $48.1 million. The increased use of cash for operating assets and liabilities in 2010 was primarily due to higher inventories and receivables and lower liabilities. The $82.8 million difference in net cash from operations between 2009 and 2010 was due to the sharp decline in business activity from the second half of 2008 to the first half of 2009 (sales down $79.1 million, or 22%), which did not repeat in the first half of 2010.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $15.1 million for the six months ended May 30, 2010, compared to $36.0 million used in the six months ended May 31, 2009. Net cash used in investing activities during the first six months of 2010 consisted of capital expenditures of $16.8 million, compared to $26.5 million in the same period of 2009. In addition to normal replacement and upgrades of machinery and equipment, the Company expanded fiberglass pipe plants in Texas and Brazil in 2010 and 2009. Normal replacement expenditures are typically equal to depreciation. During the year ending November 30, 2010, the Company anticipates spending between $30 and $40 million on capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are expected to be funded by existing cash balances, cash generated from operations or additional borrowings. During the first half of 2009, the Company contributed capital of $10.0 million to TAMCO, the Company’s 50%-owned affiliate which operates a steel mini-mill in California. The Company provides funding to TAMCO as part of the Company’s $20.0 million commitment under a $40.0 million senior secured credit facility provided by TAMCO’s shareholders. As of May 30, 2010, TAMCO’s usage of the facility totaled $27.0 million, of which $13.5 million was borrowed from the Company, down from $15.0 million as of November 30, 2009.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $5.2 million during the six months ended May 30, 2010 and $5.3 million in the six months ended May 31, 2009. Net cash used in 2010 consisted of payment of Common Stock dividends of $5.6 million and treasury stock purchases of $1.1 million, related to the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of restricted shares, offset by $1.2 million provided by the issuance of debt. Net cash used in 2009 consisted of payment of Common Stock dividends of $5.5 million and similar treasury stock purchases of $1.0 million. Also in 2009, the Company recognized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $.8 million.
The Company’s primary bank line is a revolving credit facility with six banks (the “Revolver”). Under the Revolver, the Company may, at its option, borrow up to the available amount at floating interest rates (at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 2.75% to 3.75%, determined based on the Company’s financial condition and performance) or utilize the facility for letters of credit at a similar spread, at any time until August 2012, when all borrowings under the Revolver must be repaid and letters of credit cancelled. Although Management believes the Company would be able to replace the facility at that time, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to do so under the same favorable terms and conditions. At May 30, 2010, $82.7 million was available under the Revolver.
The Revolver contains various restrictive covenants, including the requirement to maintain specified amounts of net worth and restrictions on cash dividends, borrowings, liens, investments, capital expenditures, guarantees, and financial covenants. The Company is required to maintain consolidated net worth of $375.5 million plus 50% of net income and 75% of proceeds from any equity issued after November 30, 2008. The Company's consolidated net worth exceeded the covenant amount by $143.3 million as of May 30, 2010. The Company is required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") of no more than 2.50 times. At May 30, 2010, the Company maintained a consolidated leverage ratio of .58 times EBITDA. The Revolver requires the Company to maintain qualified consolidated tangible assets at least equal to the outstanding secured funded indebtedness. At May 30, 2010, qualifying tangible assets equaled 4.53 times funded indebtedness. Under the most restrictive fixed charge coverage ratio, the sum of EBITDA and rental expense less cash taxes must be at least 1.30 times the sum of interest expense, rental expense, dividends and scheduled funded debt payments. At May 30, 2010, the Company maintained such a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.95 times. Under the most restrictive provisions of the Company's lending agreements, $16.4 million of retained earnings were not restricted at May 30, 2010, as to the declaration of cash dividends or the repurchase of Company stock. At May 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of its various lending agreements.
Cash and cash equivalents at May 30, 2010 totaled $153.4 million, a decrease of $27.8 million from November 30, 2009. At May 30, 2010, the Company had total debt outstanding of $39.1 million, compared to $38.3 million at November 30, 2009, and $106.8 million in unused committed and uncommitted credit lines available from foreign and domestic banks. The Company's highest borrowing and the average borrowing levels during 2010 were $39.5 million and $38.4 million, respectively.
Cash balances are held throughout the world, including $92.6 million held outside of the U.S. at May 30, 2010. Most of the amounts held outside of the U.S. could be repatriated to the U.S. but, under current law, would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. The Company currently plans to indefinitely maintain significant cash balances outside the U.S.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Company contributed $12.0 million to its U.S. pension plan and $2.4 million to its non-U.S. pension plans in the first six months of 2010. The Company expects to contribute an additional $1.1 million to its U.S. pension plan and $.1 million to its non-U.S. pension plans during the remainder of 2010.
In 2009, TAMCO entered into a senior secured credit facility with TAMCO’s shareholders which provides TAMCO up to $40.0 million. The shareholder credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and is scheduled to mature January 31, 2011. As of May 30, 2010, TAMCO borrowed $27.0 million under the facility, of which $13.5 million was provided by the Company. The Company continues to have a 50% ownership interest in TAMCO and accounts for its investment under the equity method of accounting.
Management believes that cash flow from operations and current cash balances, together with currently available lines of credit, will be sufficient to meet operating requirements in 2010. Cash available from operations could be affected by a worsening of the general economic downturn or any further decline or adverse changes in the Company's business, such as a loss of customers, competitive pricing pressures or significant raw material price increases.
The Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments at May 30, 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
years
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
39,137 |
|
|
$ |
7,263 |
|
|
$ |
16,174 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
15,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on debt (a)
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
35,045 |
|
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
22,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension funding
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations (b)
|
|
$ |
78,233 |
|
|
$ |
14,118 |
|
|
$ |
22,796 |
|
|
$ |
2,839 |
|
|
$ |
38,480 |
|
|
|
Commitments Expiring Per Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
Contractual Commitments
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Standby letters of credit (c)
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments (b)
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
(a) Future interest payments related to debt obligations, excluding the Revolver.
(b) The Company has no capitalized lease obligations, unconditional purchase obligations or standby repurchases obligations.
(c) Not included are standby letters of credit totaling $16,067 supporting industrial development bonds with principal of $15,700. The principal amount of the industrial development bonds is included in long-term debt. The standby letters of credit are issued under the Revolver.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: 2010 COMPARED WITH 2009
General
Net income totaled $9.5 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, on sales of $136.5 million in the three months ended May 30, 2010, compared to $9.4 million, or $1.02 per diluted share, on sales of $132.9 million in the second quarter of 2009. A 16% sales increase by the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group was partially offset by lower sales from the Water Transmission and Infrastructure Products Groups. Fiberglass-Composite Pipe primarily benefited from increased demand in energy markets, while the other Groups continued to be impacted by weak construction spending. Profits followed sales, with higher profits from the Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group more than offset by lower profits from the other two Groups. Income from consolidated operations was lower in 2010 than in 2009 partly due to the lack of income from an affiliate in Saudi Arabia, which totaled $2.2 million in 2009. Net income was flat in 2010 as lower income from consolidated operations was offset by improved results of TAMCO, the Company’s 50%-owned steel affiliate.
Net income totaled $10.6 million, or $1.15 per diluted share, on sales of $245.6 million in the six months ended May 30, 2010, compared to $13.3 million, or $1.43 per diluted share, on sales of $278.9 million in the same period in 2009. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group reported higher sales and improved segment income due to continued strength in the marine and offshore markets and improvements in the onshore oilfield market. The Water Transmission Group had lower sales and was unprofitable due to sluggish water pipe and wind tower demand. The Infrastructure Products Group had lower sales and lower segment income due to continued reduced construction spending. The decline in income for the six months ended May 30, 2010 from consolidated businesses was partially offset by improved results from TAMCO.
Sales
Total consolidated sales increased $3.6 million, or 2.7%, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the similar period in 2009 as increased Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group sales were partially offset by reduced sales of the other two Groups. Total consolidated sales for the six months ending May 30, 2010 decreased $33.4 million, or 12.0%, compared to the similar period in the prior year, due to weak economic conditions.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe's sales increased $9.1 million, or 16.5%, in the second quarter of 2010 and $6.9 million, or 6.1%, in the first six months of 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. Sales from operations in the U.S. increased $8.4 million and $1.4 million in the three and six months ended May 30, 2010, respectively. Second-quarter sales increased largely due to demand in key onshore oilfield and mining markets. Sales from Asian operations decreased $3.6 million and increased $.4 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively. Second-quarter sales into marine and offshore markets remained strong but declined due to completion of large projects. Sales from European operations decreased $1.3 million and $5.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, due to softer market conditions in Europe, North Africa and Russia. Sales from Brazilian operations increased $5.7 million and $10.6 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, due to the operation of a new oil field pipe plant and growth in the municipal water market. Looking forward, onshore oilfield demand is strengthening due to higher energy prices. Marine and offshore markets remain relatively healthy. The Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group is on track with the prior year and seeing signs of improvement.
The Water Transmission Group's sales decreased $1.0 million, or 2.3%, in the second quarter and $26.7 million, or 28.5%, in the first six months of 2010, compared to similar periods in 2009. The first-half sales decrease was largely due to weaker seasonal and cyclical demand for water pipe in the western U.S. and due to lower wind tower sales. Sales of wind towers were impacted by the lack of project financing available to wind farm developers. As of May 30, 2010, the wind tower backlog declined to $11.5 million, from $21.8 million at the end of the first quarter, due to production and the lack of new orders. Until the wind energy markets improve and more financing becomes available to the wind industry, the Group's wind tower activity is expected to remain depressed. Pipe projects that can be efficiently manufactured are being shifted to the Company’s wind tower production facility. This short-term approach is not expected to sustain the efficient operation of the wind tower facility, and underutilization in the second half of 2010 could indicate a potential impairment of certain of the Company's assets used for the production of wind towers. Near term, the water pipe business is also expected to continue to experience soft market demand. The timing of bid activity has been negatively affected by the economy, municipal budgets and availability of financing. While a number of major wind tower and pipe projects are being followed and planning activities have increased, it remains uncertain when owners, water agencies and municipalities will proceed with these projects.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Infrastructure Products' sales decreased $4.5 million, or 12.9%, in the second quarter and $13.5 million, or 18.6%, in the first six months of 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. The Company’s Hawaii Division had lower sales in both periods. The Hawaii Division continued to experience lower demand for aggregates and ready-mix on both Oahu and Maui as construction spending remained weak due to the recessionary economy. Military and governmental spending provided a stable base of business, while all other sectors declined. The Pole Products Division remained impacted by the decline in U.S. housing markets and reduced demand for concrete lighting poles for new construction and steel traffic poles. Sales of concrete poles for the replacement market improved. The Infrastructure Products Group is expected to continue to be affected by the slowdown in construction spending in Hawaii and the low level of residential construction spending throughout the U.S. Demand for Pole Products Division’s decorative concrete poles for residential lighting applications is stable. However, significant recoveries of the residential construction markets and the Infrastructure Products Group are not expected in the short term.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in the second quarter of 2010 was $35.3 million, or 25.9% of sales, compared to $36.6 million, or 27.5% of sales, in the second quarter of 2009. Year-to-date gross profit in 2010 was $64.8 million, or 26.4% of sales, compared to $71.5 million, or 25.6% of sales, in 2009. Gross profit in 2010 decreased $1.2 million in the second quarter due to lower margins and decreased $6.7 million in the first six months due to lower sales. Second-quarter profit margins were primarily impacted by the Water Transmission Group and Infrastructure Products Group which had lower plant utilization. Last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) reserves also increased in the second quarter.
Fiberglass-Composite Pipe Group's gross profit increased $3.1 million and $3.4 million in the second quarter and in the first six months of 2010, respectively, compared to the similar periods in 2009, due primarily to higher sales. Profit margins were 39.4% in the second quarter and 40.0% in the first six months of 2010, compared to 40.2% in the second quarter and 39.5% in the first six months of 2009. Compared to similar periods in 2009, margins were lower in the second quarter of 2010 due to completion of higher-margin projects in Asia, greater lower-margin sales in Brazil and higher raw material costs, and were higher in the first six months of 2010 due to favorable product mix and lower raw material costs.
Water Transmission Group's gross profit decreased $2.2 million in the second quarter and $4.9 million in the first six months of 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. Profit margins were 11.1% in the second quarter and 10.7% in the first six months of 2010, compared to 15.9% in the second quarter and 12.9% in the first six months of 2009. Margins were lower in the second quarter and the first six months of 2010, compared to 2009, due to lower plant utilization, especially related to wind tower production, offset by favorable raw material costs.
Gross profit in the Infrastructure Products Group decreased $1.2 million in the second quarter and $4.3 million in the first six months of 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. Profit margins were 17.7% in the second quarter and 16.8% in the first six months of 2010, compared to 18.8% in the second quarter and 19.5% in the first six months of 2009. Margins were lower in the second quarter and the first six months of 2010, compared to 2009, due to pricing pressures related to challenging market conditions and lower plant utilization.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses totaled $24.1 million, or 17.7% of sales, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $25.9 million, or 19.5% of sales, in the second quarter of 2009. In the six months ended May 30, 2010, SG&A expenses totaled $51.4 million, or 20.9% of sales, compared to $52.3 million, or 18.7% of sales, in the same period in 2009. The $1.7 million decrease in the second quarter of 2010 was due to lower legal and professional fees of $3.1 million, lower insurance costs of $.6 million and lower other expenses of $.4 million, partially offset by higher pension expense of $1.0 million, higher compensation expense of $.8 million and higher expenses of international operations of $.6 million related to changing foreign exchange rates. The $.9 million decrease in the first half of 2010 was due to lower legal and professional fees of $4.0 million, lower insurance costs of $1.1 million and lower other expenses of $.1 million, offset by higher pension expense of $2.0 million, higher expenses of international operations due to foreign exchange of $1.5 million and higher severance of $.8 million.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Other Income, Net
Other income totaled $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $1.5 million from the second quarter of 2009. Other income was $1.5 million in the six months ended May 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.4 million from the first half of 2009. The decreases of the second quarter and the first six months of 2010 were due primarily to lower dividends from affiliates which totaled $2.2 million in the second quarter and first half of 2009.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense was $.3 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $.1 million in the second quarter of 2009. Net interest expense was $.4 million in the six months ended May 30, 2010, compared to $.3 million in the similar period of 2009. The increase for the second quarter and the first six months of 2010 was primarily due to a reduction in interest income of $.1 million for both periods due to lower interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
Second-quarter income taxes decreased to $1.9 million in 2010, from $2.0 million in 2009. Income taxes decreased to $2.7 million in the first six months of 2010, from $4.6 million in the comparable period in 2009. The effective rate in 2010 was reduced by tax benefits recorded in the second quarter of 2010, including a $.6 million decrease in the valuation allowance against deferred assets related to delayed bonuses and restricted stock and a $.4 million decrease in current taxes payable related to the same issue. These decreases represented a correction of amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. The effective rate in 2009 was reduced by tax benefits of $1.5 million recorded in the second quarter of 2009 of which $1.2 million was associated with an adjustment to a deferred tax liability related to earnings and profits from the Company’s New Zealand subsidiary and $.3 million was related to a decrease in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses of the Company’s Netherlands subsidiary. The $1.2 million represented a correction of an amount recorded in prior period financial statements. Management believes these corrections to be immaterial to prior annual financial statements and prior and current interim financial statements. The year-to-date effective tax rate decreased to 18.0% in 2010, from 21.0% in 2009. The effective tax rates for the first half of 2010 and 2009 were based on forecasted full-year earnings and the anticipated mix of domestic and foreign earnings. Income from certain foreign operations is taxed at rates that are lower than the U.S. statutory tax rates. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2010 is not indicative of the tax rate for the full year.
Equity in Loss of Affiliate, Net of Taxes
Equity in loss of affiliate, which consists of the Company’s share of the net loss of TAMCO, totaled $.4 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $1.6 million in the similar period of 2009. For the first six months of 2010, the Company’s equity in TAMCO’s loss totaled $1.2 million, compared to $3.9 million in 2009. Equity earnings are shown net of income taxes. Equity in losses of TAMCO was taxed at an effective rate of 7.8% and 9.6% in 2010 and 2009, respectively, reflecting the dividend exclusion provided to the Company under current tax laws. TAMCO’s losses were due to the collapse of infrastructure spending for steel rebar in California, Arizona and Nevada which began in late 2008. Given the low level of demand, TAMCO is expected to continue to operate its plant intermittently to maximize liquidity and minimize losses.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
No material changes have occurred in the quantitative and qualitative market risk disclosure as presented in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report.
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Management established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify the Company's financial reports and to other members of senior Management and the Board of Directors.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of May 30, 2010 pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) are effective. “Disclosure controls and procedures” are the controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. “Disclosure controls and procedures” include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in its Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s Management, including its principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
All statements and assumptions contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any documents attached or incorporated by reference that do not directly and exclusively relate to historical facts constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements represent current expectations and beliefs of the Company, and no assurance can be given that the results described in such statements will be achieved.
Forward-looking information contained in these statements include, among other things, statements with respect to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive positions, growth opportunities, plans and objectives of Management, and other matters. Such statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in such statements. These factors include without limitation those listed below under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report, and forward-looking statements in documents attached or incorporated by reference speak only as to the date of those documents. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or release any revisions to any forward-looking statement or to report any events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In April 2004, Sable Offshore Energy Inc. ("Sable"), as agent for certain owners of the Sable Offshore Energy Project, brought an action against various coatings suppliers and application contractors, including the Company and its subsidiary, Ameron B.V., in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada. Sable seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from performance problems with several coating systems used on the Sable Offshore Energy Project, including coatings products furnished by the Company and Ameron B.V. All of the co-defendants, other than the Company, Ameron B.V. and an unaffiliated licensee of the Company, have since settled. Sable's originating notice and statement of claim alleged a claim for damages in an unspecified amount. Sable later then alleged that its claim for damages against all defendants was approximately 440.0 million Canadian dollars. More recently, however, Sable sent the Company a revised claim which included an alternative method for calculating damages. Although Sable did not specify a claim amount under its alternative method, that method if adopted would appear to substantially reduce the amount of damages. Nonetheless, the Company contests any claim amount and is vigorously defending itself on the merits in this action. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In May 2003, Dominion Exploration and Production, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (collectively "Dominion") brought an action against the Company in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana as owners of an offshore production facility known as a SPAR. Dominion sought damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from delays in delivery of the SPAR caused by the removal and replacement of certain coatings containing lead and/or lead chromate for which the manufacturer of the SPAR alleged the Company was responsible. Dominion contended that the Company made certain misrepresentations and warranties to Dominion concerning the lead-free nature of those coatings. Settlement has now been reached regarding the Dominion litigation pursuant to a settlement agreement which was executed during the second quarter of 2010. No payment by the Company is required as part of the settlement. The terms of the settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations in the second quarter and are not expected to have a material effect on its results of operation in the future.
In July 2004, BP America Production Company (“BP America”) brought an action against the Company in the 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, Louisiana in connection with fiberglass pipe sold by the Company for installation in four offshore platforms constructed for BP America. The plaintiff seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from claimed defects in such pipe. BP America’s petition as filed alleged a claim against the Company for rescission, products liability, negligence, breach of contract and warranty and for damages in an amount of not less than $20.0 million; but BP America has since reduced its claim to $12.9 million. The Company contests this amount. This matter is in discovery, and no trial date has yet been established. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
In June 2006, the Cawelo, California Water District (“Cawelo”) brought an action against the Company in Kern County Superior Court, California in connection with concrete pipe sold by the Company in 1995 for a wastewater recovery pipeline in such county. Cawelo seeks damages allegedly sustained by it resulting from the failure of such pipe in 2004. Cawelo’s petition as filed alleged a claim against the Company for products liability, negligence, breach of express warranty and breach of written contract and for damages in an amount of not less than $8.0 million, a figure which the Company contests. This matter is in discovery, and trial is currently scheduled to commence on January 24, 2011. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this action. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to this case.
The Company is a defendant in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by the Company and others. As of May 30, 2010, the Company was a defendant in 17 asbestos-related cases, compared to 22 cases as of February 28, 2010. During the quarter ended May 30, 2010, there was one new asbestos-related case, five cases dismissed, one case settled, no judgments or recovery; and expenses totaled $16,000. In the six months ended May 30, 2010, the Company recovered $36,000, net of expenses. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to estimate the possible range of loss with respect to these cases.
In December 2008, the Company received from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) a Requirement to Furnish Information regarding transactions involving Iran. The Company has cooperated fully with OFAC on this matter. With the assistance of outside counsel, the Company conducted an internal inquiry and responded to OFAC. Based upon the information available to it at this time, the Company is not able to predict the outcome of this matter. If the Company violated governmental regulations, material fines and penalties could be imposed.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the environment and is currently participating in administrative proceedings at several sites under these laws. While the Company finds it difficult to estimate with any certainty the total cost of remediation at the several sites, on the basis of currently available information and reserves provided, the Company believes that the outcome of such environmental regulatory proceedings will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.
In addition, certain other claims, suits and complaints that arise in the ordinary course of business, have been filed or are pending against the Company. Management believes that these matters are either adequately reserved, covered by insurance, or would not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations if disposed of unfavorably.
ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Terms of lending agreements which place restrictions on cash dividends are discussed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 2, herein, and Note (9) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, under Part I, Item 1, herein.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(or Units) Purchased
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar Value)
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Average Price
|
|
As Part of Publicly
|
|
of Shares (or Units) that May
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
Paid per
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
Yet Be Purchased Under
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Share (or Unit)
|
|
Programs
|
|
Plans or Programs*
|
3/1/10 thru 3/28/10
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
3/29/10 thru 5/2/10
|
|
3,735
|
|
$63.31
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
5/3/10 thru 5/30/10
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
* Does not include shares which may be repurchased to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of such restricted stock.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
EXHIBIT NO.
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective May 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009)
|
3.2
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2010)
|
4.1
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated November 25, 2005, re: SGD 51,000,000 4.25% Senior Secured Notes due November 25, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2008)
|
4.2
|
Agreement to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of instruments defining the rights of holders of certain long-term debt of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2008)
|
10.1
|
Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 30, 2009)
|
10.2
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James S. Marlen and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2003)**
|
10.3
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James S. Marlen and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2007)**
|
10.4
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between James S. Marlen and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2010)**
|
10.5
|
Change of Control Agreement between Javier Solis and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1998)**
|
10.6
|
Amendment to Change of Control Agreement between Javier Solis and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2008)**
|
10.7
|
Change of Control Agreement between Gary Wagner and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(3) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1998)**
|
10.8
|
Amendment to Change of Control Agreement between Gary Wagner and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2008)**
|
10.9
|
Change of Control Agreement between James R. McLaughlin and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(5) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2000)**
|
10.10
|
Amendment to Change of Control Agreement between James R. McLaughlin and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2008)**
|
10.11
|
Letter Agreement dated October 19, 2009 between the Company and James R. McLaughlin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 19, 2009)**
|
10.12
|
2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on March 21, 2001)**
|
10.13
|
2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit E to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on March 24, 2004)**
|
10.14
|
Key Executive Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on March 26, 2008)**
|
10.15
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 27, 2006)**
|
10.16
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 23, 2006)**
|
31.1
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer *
|
31.2
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer *
|
32
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer *
|
* Filed herewith
** Compensatory plan or arrangement
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
By:
|
/s/ Gary Wagner
|
|
|
Gary Wagner, Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: June 25, 2010