10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-31940
F.N.B. CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
25-1255406 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One F.N.B. Boulevard, Hermitage, PA
|
|
16148 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 724-981-6000
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
113,965,669 Shares |
F.N.B. CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2009
INDEX
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
492,203 |
|
|
$ |
169,224 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
636,182 |
|
|
|
482,270 |
|
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $778,183 and $851,251) |
|
|
766,543 |
|
|
|
843,863 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
26,707 |
|
|
|
10,708 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income of $34,937 and $33,962 |
|
|
5,767,109 |
|
|
|
5,820,380 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(99,415 |
) |
|
|
(104,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
5,667,694 |
|
|
|
5,715,650 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
120,246 |
|
|
|
122,599 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
529,065 |
|
|
|
528,278 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets, net |
|
|
42,601 |
|
|
|
46,229 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
204,497 |
|
|
|
217,737 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
222,306 |
|
|
|
225,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
8,710,320 |
|
|
$ |
8,364,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
948,925 |
|
|
$ |
919,539 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
3,077,091 |
|
|
|
2,816,628 |
|
Certificates and other time deposits |
|
|
2,262,677 |
|
|
|
2,318,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
6,288,693 |
|
|
|
6,054,623 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
88,263 |
|
|
|
92,305 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
540,573 |
|
|
|
596,263 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
436,595 |
|
|
|
490,250 |
|
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts |
|
|
205,049 |
|
|
|
205,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
7,559,173 |
|
|
|
7,438,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock no par value
Authorized 20,000,000 shares
Issued 100,000 shares |
|
|
95,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value
Authorized 500,000,000 shares
Issued 114,060,432 and 89,726,592 shares |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,085,647 |
|
|
|
953,200 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(34,748 |
) |
|
|
(26,505 |
) |
Treasury stock - 94,763 and 26,440 shares at cost |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,151,147 |
|
|
|
925,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
8,710,320 |
|
|
$ |
8,364,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
82,674 |
|
|
$ |
90,825 |
|
|
$ |
165,914 |
|
|
$ |
167,234 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
12,546 |
|
|
|
12,499 |
|
|
|
25,577 |
|
|
|
22,929 |
|
Nontaxable |
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
3,186 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Other |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income |
|
|
97,034 |
|
|
|
105,297 |
|
|
|
195,136 |
|
|
|
193,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
22,533 |
|
|
|
28,219 |
|
|
|
46,772 |
|
|
|
55,811 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
7,031 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
Junior subordinated debt owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts |
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
|
31,702 |
|
|
|
39,740 |
|
|
|
65,722 |
|
|
|
79,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
65,332 |
|
|
|
65,557 |
|
|
|
129,414 |
|
|
|
114,522 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,909 |
|
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
24,423 |
|
|
|
14,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
51,423 |
|
|
|
54,581 |
|
|
|
104,991 |
|
|
|
99,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on securities |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
Non-credit related losses on securities not expected to
be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges |
|
|
14,596 |
|
|
|
14,860 |
|
|
|
28,195 |
|
|
|
25,046 |
|
Insurance commissions and fees |
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
8,918 |
|
|
|
8,105 |
|
Securities commissions and fees |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
5,799 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
Gain on sale of residential mortgage loans |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income |
|
|
28,450 |
|
|
|
27,456 |
|
|
|
56,629 |
|
|
|
49,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
31,617 |
|
|
|
32,320 |
|
|
|
63,719 |
|
|
|
57,576 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
10,777 |
|
|
|
8,577 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
8,771 |
|
|
|
7,482 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
11,819 |
|
|
|
10,121 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
6,643 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
8,588 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,320 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
19,935 |
|
|
|
19,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
66,265 |
|
|
|
62,014 |
|
|
|
127,237 |
|
|
|
106,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
13,608 |
|
|
|
20,023 |
|
|
|
34,383 |
|
|
|
43,210 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
8,134 |
|
|
|
12,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
14,505 |
|
|
|
26,249 |
|
|
|
30,996 |
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount amortization |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
9,129 |
|
|
$ |
14,505 |
|
|
$ |
23,437 |
|
|
$ |
30,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (continued)
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net Income per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends per Common Share |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
953,200 |
|
|
$ |
(1,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(462 |
) |
|
$ |
925,984 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,249 |
|
Change in other comprehensive (loss) |
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
18,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends ($0.24/share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,595 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends and amortization of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,748 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
126,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
125,837 |
|
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Cumulative effect of applying FSP 115-2 and 124-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,462 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,085,647 |
|
|
$ |
5,262 |
|
|
$ |
(34,748 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,613 |
) |
|
$ |
1,151,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
508,891 |
|
|
$ |
42,426 |
|
|
$ |
(6,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(824 |
) |
|
$ |
544,357 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,996 |
|
Change in other comprehensive (loss) |
|
|
(10,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
20,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends ($0.48/share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
388,988 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
389,069 |
|
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Initial
adjustment to apply EITF 06-04 and 06-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
899,067 |
|
|
$ |
37,332 |
|
|
$ |
(17,013 |
) |
|
$ |
(785 |
) |
|
$ |
919,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
|
$ |
30,996 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
14,340 |
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
24,423 |
|
|
|
14,559 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(11,570 |
) |
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
|
|
1,270 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(15,999 |
) |
|
|
(12,374 |
) |
Trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,416 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
18,084 |
|
|
|
(15,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
56,076 |
|
|
|
216,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
10,343 |
|
|
|
(185,929 |
) |
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(334,496 |
) |
|
|
(230,775 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Maturities |
|
|
172,741 |
|
|
|
140,491 |
|
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(53,066 |
) |
|
|
(186,335 |
) |
Maturities |
|
|
129,873 |
|
|
|
82,519 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Withdrawal/surrender of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in premises and equipment |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
|
(8,812 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(64,302 |
) |
|
|
(347,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits, savings and NOW accounts |
|
|
289,849 |
|
|
|
234,909 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
(55,779 |
) |
|
|
(45,412 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(55,690 |
) |
|
|
10,942 |
|
Increase in long-term debt |
|
|
16,596 |
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
Decrease in long-term debt |
|
|
(70,251 |
) |
|
|
(68,210 |
) |
Decrease in junior subordinated debt |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
|
|
99,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
131,198 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(23,970 |
) |
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
331,205 |
|
|
|
190,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Due from Banks |
|
|
322,979 |
|
|
|
59,099 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
169,224 |
|
|
|
130,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Due from Banks at End of Period |
|
$ |
492,203 |
|
|
$ |
189,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
BUSINESS
F.N.B. Corporation (the Corporation) is a diversified financial services company headquartered
in Hermitage, Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance,
wealth management and insurance. The Corporation also conducts leasing and merchant banking
activities. The Corporation operates its community banking business through a full service branch
network in Pennsylvania and Ohio and loan production offices in Pennsylvania, Florida and
Tennessee. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance businesses within the
existing branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance business in Pennsylvania, Ohio
and Tennessee.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Corporations accompanying consolidated financial statements and these notes to the
financial statements include subsidiaries in which the Corporation has a controlling financial
interest. Companies in which the Corporation controls operating and financing decisions
(principally defined as owning a voting or economic interest greater than 50%) are also
consolidated. Variable interest entities are consolidated if the Corporation is exposed to the
majority of the variable interest entitys expected losses and/or residual returns (i.e., the
Corporation is considered to be the primary beneficiary). The Corporation owns and operates First
National Bank of Pennsylvania (FNBPA), First National Trust Company, First National Investment
Services Company, LLC, F.N.B. Investment Advisors, Inc., First National Insurance Agency, LLC,
Regency Finance Company (Regency), F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC and Bank Capital Services, and
results for each of these entities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments that are necessary,
in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect the Corporations financial position and results of
operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Events
occurring subsequent to the date of the balance sheet have been evaluated for potential recognition
or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements through August 10, 2009, the date of the
filing of the consolidated financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The interim operating
results are not necessarily indicative of operating results the Corporation expects for the full
year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporations Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform with GAAP. The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes include the allowance for loan
losses, securities valuations, goodwill and other intangible assets and income taxes.
PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCK WARRANT
In connection with the United States Treasury Departments (UST) Capital Purchase Program
(CPP), on January 9, 2009, the Corporation voluntarily issued to the UST 100,000 shares of Fixed
Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (Preferred Series C Stock) and a warrant to
purchase up to 1,302,083 shares (pursuant to Section 13(H) of the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock,
the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the
warrant was reduced in half to 651,041.5 shares as of June 16, 2009, the
date of the Corporations recently completed public offering) of the Corporations common stock,
for an aggregate purchase price of $100.0 million.
7
The Preferred Series C Stock and the warrant are classified in equity on the balance sheet.
The Preferred Series C Stock has similar characteristics of an increasing rate security as
described by Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 68, Increasing Rate Preferred Stock. The proceeds
received in conjunction with the issuance of the Preferred Series C Stock and the warrant were
allocated to preferred stock based on their relative fair values. Discounts on the Preferred
Series C Stock are amortized over the expected life of five years, by charging the imputed dividend
and issuance costs against retained earnings and increasing the carrying amount of preferred stock
by a corresponding amount.
The
Corporation calculated the fair value of the Preferred Series C Stock as its net present value by
discounting quarterly dividend payments expected to be paid on the shares over a 60-year period
using an estimated prevailing rate of interest. The Corporation determined that a market discount
rate of 12% was reasonable based on the Corporations best estimate of what similar securities
would most likely yield when issued by entities comparable to the Corporation.
The warrant, which has a term of ten years and is immediately exercisable, in whole or in
part, is carried in equity until exercised or expired based on the SEC and Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) view that they would not object to the classification of such a warrant as
permanent equity. This view is consistent with the objective of the CPP that equity in these
securities should be considered part of equity for regulatory reporting purposes.
The fair value of the warrant used in allocating total proceeds received was determined based
on a binomial option pricing model. The binomial model allowed for the use of a discrete dividend,
varying interest rates and estimates of expected volatility that market participants would likely
use in determining an exchange price. The Corporation estimated the
expected dividend payments at $0.12 per share
per quarter for the first year and increased it 5% annually thereafter over the ten-year contractual
term of the warrant. The risk free interest rates used to value the
warrant were based on the one-year forward rates implied by the U.S. Treasury Yield curve. Volatility used to value the warrant
was based on a time-frame equal to the ten-year contractual term of the warrant. Equal weighting
was given to all pre-2008 periods. Lower weighting was given to 2008 due to unprecedented levels
of market volatility occurring throughout the year.
COMMON STOCK
On June 16, 2009, the Corporation completed its public offering of 24,150,000 shares of common
stock at a price of $5.50 per share, including 3,150,000 shares of common stock purchased by the
underwriters pursuant to an over-allotment option, which the underwriters exercised in full. The
net proceeds of the offering after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses were $125.8 million.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
On August 16, 2008, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Iron and Glass Bancorp, Inc.
(IRGB), a bank holding company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. On the acquisition date, IRGB
had $301.7 million in assets, which included $168.8 million in loans and $252.3 million in
deposits. The transaction, valued at $83.7 million, resulted in the Corporation paying $36.7
million in cash and issuing 3,176,990 shares of its common stock in exchange for 1,125,026 shares
of IRGB common stock. The assets and liabilities of IRGB were recorded on the Corporations
balance sheet at their fair values as of August 16, 2008, the acquisition date, and IRGBs results
of operations have been included in the Corporations consolidated statement of income since then.
IRGBs banking subsidiary, Iron and Glass Bank, was merged into FNBPA on August 16, 2008. Based on
the purchase price allocation, the Corporation recorded $47.7 million in goodwill and $3.6 million
in core deposit intangibles as a result of the acquisition. None of the goodwill is deductible for
income tax purposes.
On April 1, 2008, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Omega Financial Corporation
(Omega), a diversified financial services company based in State College, Pennsylvania. On the
acquisition date, Omega had $1.8 billion in assets, which included $1.1 billion in loans and $1.3
billion in deposits. The all-stock transaction, valued at approximately $388.2 million, resulted
in the Corporation issuing 25,362,525 shares of its common stock in exchange for 12,544,150 shares
of Omega common stock. The assets and liabilities of Omega were recorded on the Corporations
balance sheet at their fair values as of April 1, 2008, the acquisition date, and Omegas results
of operations have been included in the Corporations consolidated statement of income since then.
Omegas banking subsidiary, Omega Bank, was merged into FNBPA on April 1, 2008. Based on the
purchase price allocation, the Corporation recorded $239.2 million in goodwill and $29.7 million in
core deposit and other intangibles as a result of the acquisition. None of the goodwill is
deductible for income tax purposes.
8
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Determining Whether Impairment of a Debt Security is Other-Than-Temporary
In January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
99-20-1, which amends EITF 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in
Securitized Financial Assets, to align the impairment guidance in EITF 99-20 with that in FAS 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and related implementation
guidance.
Prior to the issuance of FSP EITF 99-20-1, GAAP had two different models for determining
whether the impairment of a debt security is other-than-temporary. The differences are summarized
as follows:
|
a. |
|
EITF 99-20 requires the use of market participant assumptions about future cash
flows. These assumptions cannot be overcome by management judgment of the probability
of collecting all cash flows previously projected. |
|
|
b. |
|
FAS 115 does not require exclusive reliance on market participant assumptions
about future cash flows. Rather, FAS 115 permits the use of reasonable management
judgment of the probability that the holder will be unable to collect all contractual
amounts due. |
Eliminating the key distinctions between the two models promotes a more consistent
determination of whether other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) has occurred. Specifically, FSP
EITF 99-20-1 removes the requirement to use market participant assumptions when determining whether
there has been an adverse change in estimated cash flows. The provisions of FSP EITF 99-20-1 are
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and are to be
applied prospectively. The Corporation adopted the FSP beginning October 1, 2008 and considered
this guidance in determining OTTI beginning December 31, 2008.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement (FAS)
132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, to require more
detailed disclosures about employers plan assets, including employers investment strategies,
major categories of plan assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets and valuation techniques
used to measure the fair value of plan assets. FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009. Adoption of FAS 132(R)-1 will not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which amends and expands the disclosure
requirements of FAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, with the
intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. The
Corporation adopted FAS 161 effective January 1, 2009. FAS 161 relates to disclosures only and its
adoption did not have any effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of
the Corporation.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141R, Business Combinations, which establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree and the goodwill acquired. FAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements which will
enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
9
FAS 141R is effective for the Corporation for acquisitions made after January 1, 2009 and,
accordingly, was not used by the Corporation in recognizing and measuring the Omega and IRGB
acquisitions in 2008.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. FAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The Corporation adopted FAS 160 effective January 1, 2009. The
adoption of the standard did not have a material effect on the financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which replaces the
different definitions of fair value in existing accounting literature with a single definition,
sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value
measurements. The statement clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a
fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The
Corporation adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008. For additional information
regarding FAS 157, see the Fair Value Measurements footnote included in this Report.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, which clarifies the application of FAS 157 in an
inactive market and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a
financial asset is not active. The FSP states that an entity should not automatically conclude
that a particular transaction price is determinative of fair value. In a dislocated market,
judgment is required to evaluate whether individual transactions are forced liquidations or
distressed sales. When relevant observable market information is not available, a valuation
approach that incorporates managements judgments about the assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset in a current sale transaction would be acceptable. The FSP also
indicates that quotes from brokers or pricing services may be relevant inputs when measuring fair
value, but are not necessarily determinative in the absence of an active market for the asset. In
weighing a broker quote as an input to a fair value measurement, an entity should place less
reliance on quotes that do not reflect the result of market transactions. Further, the nature of
the quote (for example, whether the quote is an indicative price or a binding offer) should be
considered when weighing the available evidence. The Corporation considered this guidance in
determining its fair value measurements at June 30, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly, which amends FAS 157 to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when
the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and on
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This statement clarifies
that there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly in situations where
there has been a significant reduction in volume and activity in relation to normal market
activity. FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance on when multiple valuation techniques may be
warranted and considerations for determining the weight that should be applied to the various
techniques. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Corporation considered this guidance in determining fair value measurements at June 30, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, which extends disclosure requirements of FAS 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to interim financial statements. With certain exceptions, FAS 107 requires
disclosures of the fair value of all financial instruments (recognized or unrecognized), when
practicable to do so, and specifies the manner of disclosure. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim
and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Corporations adoption of FAS 107-1 as of June
30, 2009 did not have any effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of
the Corporation.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (OTTI)
Effective April 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted FSP 115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. FSP 115-2 significantly changes requirements for
recognizing OTTI on debt securities, presentation of OTTI losses, and modifies and expands
disclosures about OTTI for debt and equity securities.
10
Under FSP 115-2, a debt security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired if the
present value of cash flows expected to be collected are less than the securitys amortized cost
basis (the difference defined as the credit loss) or if the fair value of the security is less than
the securitys amortized cost basis and the investor intends, or more-likely-than-not will be
required, to sell the security before recovery of the securitys amortized cost basis. When OTTI
exists, if the investor does not intend to sell the security, and it is more-likely-than-not that
it will not be required to sell the security, before recovery of the securitys amortized cost
basis, the charge to earnings is limited to the amount of credit loss. Any remaining difference
between fair value and amortized cost (the difference defined as the non-credit portion) is
recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. Otherwise, the entire
difference between fair value and amortized cost is charged to earnings.
Upon adoption of FSP 115-2, the Corporation recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $4.6
million (after-tax) to reclassify from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income
the non-credit portion of OTTI loss previously recognized on debt securities it holds that it does
not intend to sell, and it is more-likely-than-not it will not be required to sell, before recovery
of the securitys amortized cost basis.
Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued FAS 165, Subsequent Events, which establishes standards under
which an entity shall recognize and disclose events that occur after a balance sheet date but
before the related financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. FAS 165 is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Adoption of FAS 165 as
of June 30, 2009 had no impact on the Corporations consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. FAS 166 amends FAS 140 to improve the relevance and
comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about
a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and the transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. FAS 166 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods that begin after
November 15, 2009. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of FAS 166 to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). FAS 167
significantly changes the criteria for determining whether the consolidation of a variable interest
entity is required. FAS 167 also addresses the effect of changes required by FAS 166 on FIN 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and concerns regarding the application of certain
provisions of FIN 46(R), including concerns that the accounting and disclosures under the
Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an entitys involvement in
a variable interest entity. FAS 167 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods that
begin after November 15, 2009. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of FAS 167 to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
In June 2009, the FASB also issued FAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.
Upon the effective date of FAS 168, the codification will become the sole source of authoritative
GAAP recognized by the FASB. FAS 168 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Adoption of FAS 168 as of September 30, 2009 is not expected to have a
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial position or results of operations as it
does not alter existing GAAP.
11
SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities are as follows (in thousands):
Securities Available For Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
217,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,252 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
220,009 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
319,444 |
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
322,514 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
75,478 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
73,869 |
|
Collateralized
debt obligations (CDO) |
|
|
27,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,153 |
) |
|
|
8,544 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
13,285 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(5,052 |
) |
|
|
8,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
653,836 |
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
(27,617 |
) |
|
|
633,228 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
656,813 |
|
|
$ |
7,152 |
|
|
$ |
(27,783 |
) |
|
$ |
636,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
249,370 |
|
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
253,295 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
131,390 |
|
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
133,056 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
71,065 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
69,181 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
20,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
14,627 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
13,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,737 |
) |
|
|
8,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
486,044 |
|
|
|
6,151 |
|
|
|
(13,423 |
) |
|
|
478,772 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
489,653 |
|
|
$ |
6,308 |
|
|
$ |
(13,691 |
) |
|
$ |
482,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held To Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
5,703 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
652,982 |
|
|
|
21,052 |
|
|
|
(7,808 |
) |
|
|
666,226 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
102,061 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
101,838 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
2,682 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
766,543 |
|
|
$ |
22,007 |
|
|
$ |
(10,367 |
) |
|
$ |
778,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
721,682 |
|
|
|
15,915 |
|
|
|
(7,442 |
) |
|
|
730,155 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
115,766 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
115,214 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
3,213 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
843,863 |
|
|
$ |
16,445 |
|
|
$ |
(9,057 |
) |
|
$ |
851,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation classifies securities as trading securities when management intends to resell
such securities in the near term and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains (losses)
reflected through the consolidated statement of income. The Corporation acquired securities in
conjunction with the Omega acquisition that the Corporation classified
12
as trading securities. The Corporation both acquired and sold these trading securities during
the second quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation did not
hold any trading securities.
The Corporation recognized a gain of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
relating to the acquisition of a company in which the Corporation owned stock. Also, the
Corporation sold $0.2 million of equity securities at a gain of $0.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and sold $1.3 million of equity securities at a gain of less than $0.1 million
during the first six months of 2008. Additionally, the Corporation recognized a gain of $0.7
million relating to the VISA, Inc. initial public offering during the first six months of 2008. No
security sales were at a loss.
As of June 30, 2009, the amortized cost and fair value of securities, by contractual
maturities, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
5,248 |
|
|
$ |
5,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
216,365 |
|
|
|
218,651 |
|
|
|
40,859 |
|
|
|
41,401 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
28,707 |
|
|
|
28,991 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
99,493 |
|
|
|
73,403 |
|
|
|
42,773 |
|
|
|
40,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,392 |
|
|
|
310,714 |
|
|
|
113,561 |
|
|
|
111,957 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
319,444 |
|
|
|
322,514 |
|
|
|
652,982 |
|
|
|
666,226 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
656,813 |
|
|
$ |
636,182 |
|
|
$ |
766,543 |
|
|
$ |
778,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities may differ from contractual terms because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without penalties. Periodic payments are received on mortgage-backed
securities based on the payment patterns of the underlying collateral.
Following are summaries of the fair values and unrealized losses of securities, segregated by
length of impairment (in thousands):
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
21,945 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,945 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
134,938 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,938 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
54,810 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
56,847 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
(11,384 |
) |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
(7,769 |
) |
|
|
8,544 |
|
|
|
(19,153 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,154 |
|
|
|
(5,052 |
) |
|
|
8,154 |
|
|
|
(5,052 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
218,487 |
|
|
$ |
(14,766 |
) |
|
$ |
13,110 |
|
|
$ |
(13,017 |
) |
|
$ |
231,597 |
|
|
$ |
(27,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
33,856 |
|
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,856 |
|
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
54,230 |
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,230 |
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
(3,362 |
) |
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
(4,737 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,936 |
|
|
$ |
(4,077 |
) |
|
$ |
7,891 |
|
|
$ |
(9,614 |
) |
|
$ |
101,827 |
|
|
$ |
(13,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
5,142 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,142 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
46,110 |
|
|
|
(7,659 |
) |
|
|
55,304 |
|
|
|
(7,808 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
27,941 |
|
|
|
(966 |
) |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
29,791 |
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,529 |
|
|
$ |
(1,134 |
) |
|
$ |
51,597 |
|
|
$ |
(9,233 |
) |
|
$ |
94,126 |
|
|
$ |
(10,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
96,213 |
|
|
$ |
(6,531 |
) |
|
$ |
7,832 |
|
|
$ |
(911 |
) |
|
$ |
104,045 |
|
|
$ |
(7,442 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
44,555 |
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,555 |
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141,045 |
|
|
$ |
(7,466 |
) |
|
$ |
12,277 |
|
|
$ |
(1,591 |
) |
|
$ |
153,322 |
|
|
$ |
(9,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, securities with unrealized losses for less than 12 months include 3
investments in U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies and corporations, 17 investments in
residential mortgage-backed securities, 103 investments in states of the U.S. and political
subdivision securities, 12 investments in corporate and other debt securities and 11 investments in
equity securities. Securities with unrealized losses of greater than 12 months include 11
investments in residential mortgage-backed securities, 6 investments in states of the U.S. and
political subdivisions, 14 investments in corporate and other debt securities and 2 investments in
equity securities.
The Corporations unrealized losses on corporate debt securities primarily relate to
investments in trust preferred securities. The Corporations portfolio of trust preferred
securities consists of single-issuer and pooled securities. The single-issuer securities are
primarily from money-center and large regional banks. The pooled securities consist of securities
issued primarily by banks, with some of the pools including a limited number of insurance
companies. Investments in pooled securities are all in mezzanine tranches except for one
investment in a senior tranche, and are secured by over-collateralization or default protection
provided by subordinated tranches. Unrealized losses on investments in trust preferred securities
are attributable to temporary illiquidity and the uncertainty affecting these markets, as well as
changes in interest rates.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
The Corporation evaluates its investment securities portfolio for OTTI on a quarterly basis.
Impairment is assessed at the individual security level. The Corporation considers an investment
security impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost or amortized cost basis.
When impairment of an equity security is considered to be other-than-temporary, the security
is written down to its fair value and an impairment loss is recorded as a loss within non-interest
income in the consolidated statement of income. When impairment of a debt security is considered
to be other-than-temporary, the amount of the OTTI recorded as a loss within non-interest income
and thereby recognized in earnings depends on whether the entity intends to sell the security or
more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost
basis.
If the Corporation intends to (has decided to) sell the debt security or more likely than not
will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value.
If the Corporation does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than
not the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost
basis, OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing credit loss and the amount related to
all other factors. The amount related to credit loss shall be recognized in earnings. The amount related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive
income, net of applicable taxes.
14
The Corporations performs its OTTI evaluation process in a consistent and systematic manner
and includes an evaluation of all available evidence. Documentation of the process is extensive as
necessary to support a conclusion as to whether a decline in fair value below cost or amortized
cost is other-than-temporary and includes documentation supporting both observable and unobservable
inputs and a rationale for conclusions reached. In making these determinations for pooled trust
preferred securities, the Corporation consults with a third-party advisory firm to provide
additional valuation assistance.
This process considers factors such as the severity, length of time and anticipated recovery
period of the impairment, recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance
sheet date, recent events specific to the issuer, including investment downgrades by rating
agencies and economic conditions of its industry, and the issuers financial condition, capital
strength and near-term prospects.
For debt securities, the Corporation also considers the payment structure of the debt
security, the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments that increase in the future,
failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest and principal payments, whether
the Corporation has made a decision to sell the security and whether the Corporations cash or
working capital requirements or contractual or regulatory obligations indicate that the debt
security will be required to be sold before a forecasted recovery occurs. For equity securities,
the Corporation also considers its intent and ability to retain the security for a period of time
sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value. Among the factors that are considered in
determining the Corporations intent and ability to retain the security is a review of its capital
adequacy, interest rate risk position and liquidity.
The assessment of a securitys ability to recover any decline in fair value, the ability of
the issuer to meet contractual obligations, the Corporations intent and ability to retain the
security, and whether it is more likely than not the Corporation will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis require considerable judgment.
Debt securities with credit ratings below AA at the time of purchase that are
repayment-sensitive securities are evaluated using the guidance of FAS 115 and the related guidance
of EITF 99-20 and FSP EITF 99-20-1, as amended by FSP 115-2. All other securities are required to
be evaluated under FAS 115, as amended by FAS 115-2, and related implementation guidance.
The Corporation recognized losses of $0.9 million and $0.5 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to the write-down to fair value of securities that the
Corporation deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The impairment losses for 2009 consisted
of $0.6 million related to bank stocks and $0.3 million related to investments in pooled trust
preferred securities. Under FSP 115-2, total OTTI charges on pooled trust preferred securities
amounted to $1.0 million, which includes $0.3 million of credit-related impairment charges and $0.7
million recorded directly to other comprehensive income for non-credit related impairment on
securities.
The $0.6 million OTTI charge for bank stocks relates to securities that have been in an
unrealized loss position for an extended period of time or the percentage of unrealized loss is
such that management believes it will be unlikely to recover in the near term. In accordance with
GAAP, management has deemed these impairments to be other-than-temporary given the low likelihood
that they will recover in value in the foreseeable future. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation held
28 bank stocks with an adjusted cost basis of $3.0 million and a fair value of $2.9 million.
The Corporation invests in trust preferred securities issued by special purpose vehicles
(SPVs) which hold pools of collateral consisting of trust preferred and subordinated debt
securities issued by banks, bank holding companies and insurance companies. The securities issued
by the SPVs are generally segregated into several classes known as tranches. Typically, the
structure includes senior, mezzanine and equity tranches. The equity tranche represents the first
loss position. The Corporation generally holds interests in mezzanine tranches. Interest and
principal collected from the collateral held by the SPVs are distributed with a priority that
provides the highest level of protection to the senior-most tranches. In order to provide a high
level of protection to the senior tranches, cash flows are diverted to higher-level tranches if
certain tests are not met.
The Corporation prices its holdings of trust preferred securities using Level 3 inputs in
accordance with FAS 157 and guidance issued by the SEC and FASB. In this regard, the Corporation
evaluates current available information
15
in estimating the future cash flows of these securities and determines whether there have been
favorable or adverse changes in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected. The
Corporation considers the structure and term of the pool and the financial condition of the
underlying issuers. Specifically, the evaluation incorporates factors such as
over-collateralization and interest coverage tests, interest rates and appropriate risk premiums,
the timing and amount of interest and principal payments and the allocation of payments to the
various tranches. Current estimates of cash flows are based on the most recent trustee reports,
announcements of deferrals or defaults, and assumptions regarding expected future default rates,
prepayment and recovery rates and other relevant information. In constructing these assumptions,
the Corporation considers the following:
|
|
|
that current defaults would have minimal, if any, recovery, |
|
|
|
|
that current deferrals would default and exhibit minimal recovery, |
|
|
|
|
recent historical performance metrics, including profitability, capital ratios, loan
charge-offs and loan reserve ratios, for the underlying institutions that would
indicate a higher probability of default by the institution, |
|
|
|
|
that institutions identified as possessing a higher probability of default would
recover at a rate of 10% for banks and 15% for insurance companies, |
|
|
|
|
that financial performance of the financial sector continues to be affected by the
economic environment resulting in an expectation of additional deferrals and defaults
in the future, |
|
|
|
|
whether the security is currently deferring interest, and |
|
|
|
|
the external rating of the security and recent changes to its external rating. |
The primary evidence utilized by the Corporation is the level of current deferrals and
defaults, the level of excess subordination that allows for receipt of full principal and interest,
the credit rating for each security and the likelihood that future deferrals and defaults will
occur at a level that will fully erode the excess subordination based on an assessment of the
underlying collateral. The Corporation combines the results of these factors considered in
estimating the future cash flows of these securities to determine whether there has been an adverse
change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected.
The Corporations portfolio of trust preferred collateralized debt obligations consists of 13
pooled issues and seven single issue securities. One of the pooled issues is a senior tranche; the
remaining 12 are mezzanine tranches. At June 30, 2009, the 13 pooled trust preferred securities
had an estimated fair value of $11.2 million while the single-issuer trust preferred securities had
an estimated fair value of $9.0 million. The Corporation has concluded from the analysis performed
at June 30, 2009 that it is probable that the Corporation will collect all contractual principal
and interest payments on all of its single-issuer and pooled trust preferred securities, except for
those on which OTTI was recognized.
In 2008, the Corporation concluded that it was probable that there had been an adverse change
in estimated cash flows for eight of the 13 pooled trust preferred security investments.
Accordingly, the Corporation recognized OTTI on these securities of $15.9 million at December 31,
2008. At June 30, 2009, these securities are classified as non-performing investments. Upon
adoption of FSP 115-2, the Corporation determined that $7.0 million of those OTTI charges were
non-credit related. As such, a $4.6 million (net of $2.4 million of taxes) increase to retained
earnings and a corresponding decrease to accumulated other comprehensive income was recorded as the
cumulative effect impact of adopting FSP 115-2 as of April 1, 2009.
16
The following table presents a summary of the cumulative credit related OTTI charges
recognized as components of earnings for securities still held by the Corporation at June 30, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of cumulative credit losses on pooled trust preferred securities, April 1,
2009 (1) |
|
$ |
(8,953 |
) |
Additions for credit losses recorded during the second quarter of 2009 which were not
previously
recognized as components of earnings |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of cumulative credit losses on pooled trust preferred securities, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(9,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the OTTI charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008 for
pooled trust preferred securities, net of the Corporations cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of
FSP 115-2, effective April 1, 2009. |
Trust preferred securities continue to experience price declines due to uncertainties
surrounding these securities in the current market environment and the currently limited secondary
market for such securities, in addition to issue-specific credit deterioration. Write-downs were
based on the individual securities credit performance and its ability to make its contractual
principal and interest payments. Should credit quality continue to deteriorate, it is possible
that additional write-downs may be required. The Corporation monitors actual deferrals and
defaults as well as expected future deferrals and defaults to determine if there is a high
probability for expected losses and contractual shortfalls of interest or principal, which could
warrant further impairment. The Corporation evaluates its entire portfolio each quarter to
determine if additional write-downs are warranted.
17
The following table provides information relating to the Corporations trust preferred securities as of June 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Actual Deferrals/ |
|
Expected Deferrals/ |
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest |
|
Issuers |
|
Defaults (as |
|
Defaults (as a % of |
|
Subordination (as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Credit |
|
Currently |
|
a % of original |
|
remaining performing |
|
a % of current |
Deal Name |
|
Type |
|
Class |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
Ratings |
|
Performing |
|
collateral) |
|
collateral) (1) |
|
collateral) (2) |
|
Pooled Trust Preferred Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
$ |
(2,218 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P2 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P3 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
(2,846 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P4 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P5 |
|
Pooled |
|
MEZ |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
Caa1 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
P6 |
|
Pooled |
|
MEZ |
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P7 |
|
Pooled |
|
MEZ |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
P8 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
A4L |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,165 |
|
|
$ |
5,781 |
|
|
$ |
(11,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P9 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
B1 |
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
(2,097 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
P10 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
(3,801 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
P11 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
P12 |
|
Pooled |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
Ca |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
P13 |
|
Pooled |
|
SNR |
|
|
3,718 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Not Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,250 |
|
|
$ |
5,445 |
|
|
$ |
(8,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pooled Trust Preferred Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,415 |
|
|
$ |
11,226 |
|
|
$ |
(20,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Issuer Trust Preferred Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S1 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
(942 |
) |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S2 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S3 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S4 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S5 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S6 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
S7 |
|
Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Single Issuer Trust Preferred Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,345 |
|
|
$ |
8,981 |
|
|
$ |
(5,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trust Preferred Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,711 |
|
|
$ |
20,207 |
|
|
$ |
(25,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Current deferrals and defaults are assumed to have zero recovery while future deferrals
and defaults are assumed to have recovery rates of 10% for banks and 15% for
insurance companies. |
|
(2) |
|
Excess subordination represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and projected
defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences any credit impairment. |
18
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
The Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Pittsburgh. The FHLB
requires members to purchase and hold a specified minimum level of FHLB stock based upon their
level of borrowings, collateral balances and participation in other programs offered by the FHLB.
Stock in the FHLB is non-marketable and is redeemable at the discretion of the FHLB. Both cash and
stock dividends are reported as income.
Members do not purchase stock in the FHLB for the same reasons that traditional equity
investors acquire stock in an investor-owned enterprise. Rather, members purchase stock to obtain
access to the low-cost products and services offered by the FHLB. Unlike equity securities of
traditional for-profit enterprises, the stock of FHLB does not provide its holders with an
opportunity for capital appreciation because, by regulation, FHLB stock can only be purchased,
redeemed and transferred at par value.
At both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporations FHLB stock totaled $28.0
million and is included in other assets on the balance sheet. The Corporation accounts for the
stock based on the industry guidance in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position (SOP) 01-6, Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities with Trade
Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others, which requires the investment to be
carried at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value.
The Corporation periodically evaluates its FHLB investment for possible impairment based on,
among other things, the capital adequacy of the FHLB and its overall financial condition. The
Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator of the FHLB, requires it to maintain a total
capital-to-assets ratio of at least 4.0%. At March 31, 2009, the FHLBs capital ratio of 5.3%
exceeded the regulatory requirement. Failure by the FHLB to meet this regulatory capital
requirement would require an in-depth analysis of other factors including:
|
|
|
the members ability to access liquidity from the FHLB; |
|
|
|
|
the members funding cost advantage with the FHLB compared to alternative sources of
funds; |
|
|
|
|
a decline in the market value of FHLBs net assets relative to book value which may
or may not affect future financial performance or cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
the FHLBs ability to obtain credit and source liquidity, for which one indicator is
the credit rating of the FHLB; |
|
|
|
|
the FHLBs commitment to make payments taking into account its ability to meet
statutory and regulatory payment obligations and the level of such payments in relation
to the FHLBs operating performance; and |
|
|
|
|
the prospects of amendments to laws that affect the rights and obligations of the
FHLB. |
The Corporation believes its holdings in the stock are ultimately recoverable at par value at
June 30, 2009 and, therefore, determined that FHLB stock was not other-than-temporarily impaired.
In addition, the Corporation has ample liquidity and does not require redemption of its FHLB stock
in the foreseeable future.
19
BORROWINGS
Following is a summary of short-term borrowings (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
436,936 |
|
|
$ |
414,705 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
103,383 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,032 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,573 |
|
|
$ |
596,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of long-term debt (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
$ |
375,164 |
|
|
$ |
431,398 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,818 |
|
|
|
58,028 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
436,595 |
|
|
$ |
490,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations banking affiliate has available credit with the FHLB of $1.8 billion, of
which $375.2 million was used as of June 30, 2009. These advances are secured by loans and FHLB
stock and are scheduled to mature in various amounts periodically through the year 2019. Effective
interest rates paid on these advances range from 2.12% to 5.54% for both the six months ended June
30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT OWED TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS
The Corporation has four unconsolidated subsidiary trusts (collectively, the Trusts): F.N.B.
Statutory Trust I, F.N.B. Statutory Trust II, Omega Financial Capital Trust I and Sun Bancorp
Statutory Trust I. One hundred percent of the common equity of each Trust is owned by the
Corporation. The Trusts are not consolidated because the Corporation is not the primary
beneficiary, as evaluated under FAS Interpretation (FIN) 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing
Corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities (trust preferred securities) to
third-party investors. The proceeds from the sale of trust preferred securities and the issuance
of common equity by the Trusts were invested in junior subordinated debt securities (subordinated
debt) issued by the Corporation, which are the sole assets of each Trust. The Trusts pay dividends
on the trust preferred securities at the same rate as the distributions paid by the Corporation on
the junior subordinated debt held by the Trusts. Omega Financial Capital Trust I and Sun Bancorp
Statutory Trust I were acquired as a result of the Omega acquisition.
Distributions on the subordinated debt issued to the Trusts are recorded as interest expense
by the Corporation. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole
or in part, upon repayment of the subordinated debt. The subordinated debt, net of the
Corporations investment in the Trusts, qualifies as Tier 1 capital under the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (FRB) guidelines subject to certain limitations beginning March 31,
2011. The Corporation has entered into agreements which, when taken collectively, fully and
unconditionally guarantee the obligations under the trust preferred securities subject to the terms
of each of the guarantees.
20
The following table provides information relating to the Trusts as of June 30, 2009 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. |
|
F.N.B. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Bancorp |
|
|
Statutory |
|
Statutory |
|
Omega Financial |
|
Statutory |
|
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Capital Trust I |
|
Trust I |
Trust preferred
securities |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,500 |
|
Common securities |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
22,165 |
|
|
|
35,795 |
|
|
|
18,223 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
|
3/31/33 |
|
|
|
6/15/36 |
|
|
|
10/18/34 |
|
|
|
2/22/31 |
|
Optional redemption date |
|
|
3/31/08 |
|
|
|
6/15/11 |
|
|
|
10/18/09 |
|
|
|
2/22/11 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
10.20 |
% |
|
|
variable; |
|
fixed until 6/15/11; |
|
fixed until 10/09; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR plus |
|
then LIBOR plus |
|
then LIBOR plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 basis points |
|
165 basis points |
|
219 basis points |
|
|
|
|
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation periodically enters into interest rate swap agreements to meet the
financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of its commercial loan customers. These
agreements provide the customer the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. The
Corporation then enters into positions with a derivative counterparty in order to offset its
exposure on the variable and fixed components of the customer agreements. These agreements meet
the definition of derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133. These
instruments and their offsetting positions are reported at fair value in other assets and other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current
period earnings as other income.
At June 30, 2009, the Corporation was party to 75 swaps with notional amounts totaling
approximately $309.8 million with customers, and 75 swaps with notional amounts totaling
approximately $309.8 million with derivative counterparties. The asset and liability associated
with these interest rate swaps were $13.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively. During the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized a net gain of $0.3 million related to
changes in fair value.
Interest rate swap agreements generally require posting of collateral by either party under
certain conditions. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation has posted collateral with derivative
counterparties with a fair value of $1.6 million. Counterparties have posted collateral with the
Corporation with a fair value of $0.6 million. Additionally, if the Corporation breaches its
agreements with its derivative counterparties it would be required to settle its obligations under
the agreements at the termination value and would be required to pay an additional $10.1 million in
excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the counterparty.
The Corporation has entered into interest rate lock commitments to originate residential
mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to
secondary market investors. These arrangements are considered derivative instruments. The fair
values of the Corporations rate lock commitments to customers and commitments with investors at
June 30, 2009 were not material.
COMMITMENTS, CREDIT RISK AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation has commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
that involve certain elements of credit risk in excess of the amount stated in the consolidated
balance sheet. The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the
customer is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The credit risk associated
with loan commitments and standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Since many of these
commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash flow requirements.
21
Following is a summary of off-balance sheet credit risk information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
1,280,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,254,470 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
90,257 |
|
|
|
97,016 |
|
At June 30, 2009, funding of approximately 83.3% of the commitments to extend credit was
dependent on the financial condition of the customer. The Corporation has the ability to withdraw
such commitments at its discretion. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Based on managements credit evaluation of
the customer, collateral may be deemed necessary. Collateral requirements vary and may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial
properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation that may
require payment at a future date. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The obligations are not
recorded in the Corporations consolidated financial statements. The Corporations exposure to
credit loss in the event the customer does not satisfy the terms of the agreement equals the
notional amount of the obligation less the value of any collateral.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation or a
subsidiary acted as one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter,
fiduciary, financial advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the
ultimate outcome for any asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation
believes that it and its subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are
established for legal claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period.
INCOME TAXES
The Corporation bases its provision for income taxes upon income before income taxes, adjusted
for the effect of certain tax-exempt income and non-deductible expenses. In addition, the
Corporation reports certain items of income and expense in different periods for financial
reporting and tax return purposes. The Corporation recognizes the tax effects of these temporary
differences currently in the deferred income tax provision or benefit. The Corporation computes
deferred tax assets or liabilities based upon the differences between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the applicable marginal tax rate.
The Corporation must evaluate the probability that it will ultimately realize the full value
of its deferred tax assets. Realization of the Corporations deferred tax assets is dependent upon
a number of factors including the existence of any cumulative losses in prior periods, the amount
of taxes paid in available carry-back periods, expectations for future earnings, applicable tax
planning strategies and assessment of current and future economic and business conditions. The
Corporation establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the
Corporation will not be able to realize a benefit from its deferred tax assets, or when future
deductibility is uncertain.
At June 30, 2009, the Corporation anticipates that it will not utilize state net operating
loss carryforwards and other net deferred tax assets at certain of its subsidiaries and has
recorded a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. The Corporation believes that,
except for the portion which is covered by the valuation allowance, it is more likely than not to
realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets, net of the valuation allowance, at June 30, 2009
based on the level of historical taxable income and taxes paid in available carry-back periods.
22
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per common share is computed using net income available to common shareholders, which
is net income adjusted for the preferred stock dividend and discount amortization requirements.
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding net of unvested
shares of restricted stock.
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to
common shareholders adjusted for interest expense on convertible debt by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of potential common
shares issuable for stock options, warrants, restricted shares and convertible debt, as calculated
using the treasury stock method. Adjustments to the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding are made only when such adjustments dilute earnings per common share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share
(dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income available to common
shareholders basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
9,129 |
|
|
$ |
14,505 |
|
|
$ |
23,437 |
|
|
$ |
30,996 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders after assumed conversion
diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
9,134 |
|
|
$ |
14,510 |
|
|
$ |
23,447 |
|
|
$ |
31,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
93,387,226 |
|
|
|
85,632,970 |
|
|
|
91,396,295 |
|
|
|
72,926,385 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options, warrants,
restricted stock and convertible debt |
|
|
209,294 |
|
|
|
420,724 |
|
|
|
203,355 |
|
|
|
396,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
93,596,520 |
|
|
|
86,053,694 |
|
|
|
91,599,650 |
|
|
|
73,322,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase 1,011,145 and 582,671
shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. For the three months ended June 30,
2009, warrants to purchase 696,566 shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase 1,011,145 and 638,780 shares of common stock,
respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
because they were antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, warrants to purchase
696,566 shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because they were antidilutive.
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Restricted Stock
The Corporation issues restricted stock awards, consisting of both restricted stock and
restricted stock units, to key employees under its Incentive Compensation Plans (Plans). The grant
date fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the price of the Corporations common
stock on the grant date. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
23
2008, the Corporation issued 367,308 and 245,255 restricted stock awards with aggregate weighted
average grant date fair values of $2.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The Corporation has
available up to 2,884,168 shares of common stock to issue under these Plans.
Under the Plans, more than half of the restricted stock awards granted to management are
earned if the Corporation meets or exceeds certain financial performance results when compared to
its peers. These performance-related awards are expensed ratably from the date that the likelihood
of meeting the performance measure is probable through the end of a four-year vesting period. The
service-based awards are expensed ratably over a three-year vesting period. The Corporation also
issues discretionary service-based awards to certain employees that vest over five years.
The unvested restricted stock awards are eligible to receive cash dividends which are
ultimately used to purchase additional shares of stock. Any additional shares of stock ultimately
received as a result of cash dividends are subject to forfeiture if the requisite service period is
not completed or the specified performance criteria are not met. These awards are subject to
certain accelerated vesting provisions upon retirement, death, disability or in the event of a
change of control as defined in the award agreements.
Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards was $1.1 million and $1.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the tax benefit of which was $0.4 million
and $0.5 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes certain information concerning restricted stock awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Awards |
|
Price |
|
Awards |
|
Price |
Unvested
awards outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
527,101 |
|
|
$ |
15.34 |
|
|
|
387,064 |
|
|
$ |
17.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
367,308 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
245,255 |
|
|
|
13.51 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(98,695 |
) |
|
|
17.66 |
|
|
|
(114,675 |
) |
|
|
18.58 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(66,630 |
) |
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
(27,441 |
) |
|
|
14.67 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
21,342 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
18,095 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested awards outstanding at end of period |
|
|
750,426 |
|
|
|
11.04 |
|
|
|
508,298 |
|
|
|
15.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of awards vested was $1.0 million and $1.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, there was $4.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock awards including $0.1 million that is subject to accelerated vesting
under the Plans immediate vesting upon retirement provision for awards granted prior to the
adoption of FAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. The components of the restricted
stock awards as of June 30, 2009 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service- |
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
Based |
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Total |
Unvested awards |
|
|
282,657 |
|
|
|
467,769 |
|
|
|
750,426 |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense |
|
$ |
1,624 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
4,743 |
|
Intrinsic value |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
$ |
4,645 |
|
Weighted average remaining life (in years) |
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
Stock Options
No stock options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008. All
outstanding stock options were granted at prices equal to the fair market value at the date of the
grant, are primarily exercisable within ten years from the date of the grant and were fully vested
as of January 1, 2006. The Corporation issues shares of treasury stock or authorized but unissued
shares to satisfy stock option exercises. Shares issued upon the exercise of stock options were
1,624 and 54,320 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
24
The following table summarizes certain information concerning stock option awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,299,317 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
1,139,845 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
Assumed in acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798,371 |
|
|
|
16.49 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
15.53 |
|
|
|
(54,320 |
) |
|
|
11.87 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(269,770 |
) |
|
|
14.78 |
|
|
|
(55,054 |
) |
|
|
19.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,027,923 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
1,828,842 |
|
|
|
13.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options at June 30, 2009 was $(7.5)
million, since the fair value of the stock was less than the exercise price.
Warrants
The Corporation assumed warrants to issue 123,394 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $10.00 in conjunction with a previous acquisition. Such warrants are exercisable and will
expire on various dates in 2009. The Corporation has reserved shares of common stock for issuance
in the event these warrants are exercised. As of June 30, 2009, warrants to purchase 45,524 shares
of common stock remain outstanding.
In conjunction with its participation in the CPP, the Corporation issued to the UST a warrant
to purchase up to 1,302,083 shares (pursuant to Section 13(H) of the Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock, the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise
of the warrant was reduced in half to 651,041.5 shares as of June 16,
2009, the date of the Corporations recently completed public offering) of the Corporations common
stock. The warrant, which is currently exercisable, has a ten-year term and an exercise price of
$11.52.
RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation sponsors the Retirement Income Plan (RIP), a qualified noncontributory defined
benefit pension plan covering substantially all salaried employees hired prior to January 1, 2008.
The RIP covers employees who satisfy minimum age and length of service requirements. During 2006,
the Corporation amended the RIP such that effective January 1, 2007, benefits are earned based on
the employees compensation each year. The plan amendment resulted in a remeasurement that
produced a net unrecognized service credit of $14.0 million, which is being amortized over the
average period of future service of active employees of 13.5 years. Benefits of the RIP for
service provided prior to December 31, 2006 are generally based on years of service and the
employees highest compensation for five consecutive years during their last ten years of
employment. During 2007, the Corporation amended the RIP such that it is closed to participants
who commence employment with the Corporation on or after January 1, 2008. The Corporations
funding guideline has been to make annual contributions to the RIP each year, if necessary, such
that minimum funding requirements have been met. Based on the funded status of the plan, the
Corporation does not expect to make a contribution to the RIP in 2009.
The Corporation also sponsors two supplemental non-qualified retirement plans. The ERISA
Excess Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the
maximum benefit allowable under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would be provided
under the RIP, if no limits were applied. The Basic Retirement Plan (BRP) is applicable to certain
officers who are designated by the Board of Directors. Officers participating in the BRP receive a
benefit based on a target benefit percentage based on years of service at retirement and a
designated tier as determined by the Board of Directors. When a participant retires, the basic
benefit under the BRP is a monthly benefit equal to the target benefit percentage times the
participants highest average monthly cash compensation during five consecutive calendar years
within the last ten calendar years of employment. This monthly benefit is reduced by the monthly
benefit the participant receives from Social Security, the RIP, the ERISA Excess
25
Retirement Plan and the annuity equivalent of the two percent automatic contributions to the
qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan and the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan. The BRP was
frozen as of December 31, 2008, at which time the Corporation recognized a one-time charge of $0.8
million. The Corporation expects an annual savings of approximately $0.3 million as a result of
freezing its BRP.
The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit plans includes the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
3,296 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
(4,372 |
) |
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net transition asset |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Unrecognized prior service (credit) cost |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(546 |
) |
Unrecognized loss |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,213 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
2,425 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations subsidiaries participate in a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan
under which eligible employees may contribute a percentage of their salary. The Corporation
matches 50 percent of an eligible employees contribution on the first 6 percent that the employee
defers. Employees are generally eligible to participate upon completing 90 days of service and
having attained age 21. Beginning with 2007, in light of the change to the RIP benefit, the
Corporation began making an automatic two percent contribution and may make an additional
contribution of up to two percent depending on the Corporation achieving its performance goals for
the plan year. Effective January 1, 2008, in lieu of the RIP benefit, the automatic contribution
for substantially all new full-time employees was increased from two percent to four percent. The
Corporations contribution expense was $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Corporation also sponsors an ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan for certain officers. This plan
provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit allowable
under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would have been provided under the qualified
401(k) defined contribution plan, if no limits were applied.
The Corporation sponsors a pre-Medicare eligible postretirement medical insurance plan for
retirees of certain affiliates between the ages of 62 and 65. During 2006, the Corporation amended
the plan such that only employees who were age 60 or older as of January 1, 2007 are eligible for
employer-paid coverage. The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to this plan and funds the
benefits as claims arise. Benefit costs related to this plan are recognized in the periods in
which employees provide the service for such benefits. The Corporation reserves the right to
terminate the plan or make plan changes at any time.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,598 |
|
|
$ |
14,505 |
|
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
|
$ |
30,996 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arising during the period, net of tax benefit
of $736, $4,415, $2,449 and $5,266 |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
(8,199 |
) |
|
|
(4,547 |
) |
|
|
(9,780 |
) |
Non-credit related losses on securities not expected
to be sold, net of tax benefit of $2,457 |
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains
included
in net income, net of tax (benefit) expense of
$(236), $(143), $(210) and $118 |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
Unrealized loss on swap, net of tax benefit of $69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
Pension and postretirement amortization, net of
tax expense (benefit) of $129, $(39), $258 and $(79) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(5,254 |
) |
|
|
(8,006 |
) |
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
|
(10,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
5,344 |
|
|
$ |
6,499 |
|
|
$ |
18,006 |
|
|
$ |
20,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized losses on securities |
|
$ |
(8,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,620 |
) |
Non-credit related losses on securities not expected to be sold |
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement obligations |
|
|
(21,688 |
) |
|
|
(6,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(34,748 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Following is a summary of supplemental cash flow information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
67,102 |
|
|
$ |
75,011 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned |
|
|
10,346 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
Financing of other real estate owned sold |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
27
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Corporation operates in four reportable segments: Community Banking, Wealth Management,
Insurance and Consumer Finance.
|
|
|
The Community Banking segment provides services traditionally offered by full-service
commercial banks, including commercial and individual demand, savings and time deposit
accounts and commercial, mortgage and individual installment loans. |
|
|
|
|
The Wealth Management segment provides a broad range of personal and corporate fiduciary
services including the administration of decedent and trust estates. In addition, it
offers various alternative products, including securities brokerage and investment advisory
services, mutual funds and annuities. |
|
|
|
|
The Insurance segment includes a full-service insurance agency offering all lines of
commercial and personal insurance through major carriers. The Insurance segment also
includes a reinsurer. |
|
|
|
|
The Consumer Finance segment is primarily involved in making installment loans to
individuals and purchasing installment sales finance contracts from retail merchants. The
Consumer Finance segment activity is funded through the sale of the Corporations
subordinated notes at the finance companys branch offices. |
The following tables provide financial information for these segments of the Corporation (in
thousands). The information provided under the caption Parent and Other represents operations
not considered to be reportable segments and/or general operating expenses of the Corporation, and
includes the parent company, other non-bank subsidiaries and eliminations and adjustments which are
necessary for purposes of reconciliation to the consolidated amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
88,505 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
7,959 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
97,034 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
27,380 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
31,702 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
61,125 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
(2,406 |
) |
|
|
65,332 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
13,909 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
21,437 |
|
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
(1,925 |
) |
|
|
28,450 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
52,567 |
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
64,452 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
3,010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
12,340 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
(3,362 |
) |
|
|
10,598 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,541,012 |
|
|
|
18,987 |
|
|
|
23,891 |
|
|
|
163,370 |
|
|
|
(36,940 |
) |
|
|
8,710,320 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
544,949 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
96,809 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
7,853 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
105,297 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
35,360 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
39,740 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
61,449 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
6,498 |
|
|
|
(2,539 |
) |
|
|
65,557 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
9,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
10,976 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
19,491 |
|
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
(2,065 |
) |
|
|
27,456 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
49,530 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
60,795 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
6,040 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
5,518 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
15,248 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
14,505 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,901,578 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
26,035 |
|
|
|
157,679 |
|
|
|
(8,325 |
) |
|
|
8,095,880 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
497,503 |
|
|
|
12,907 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,397 |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Six Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
178,009 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
15,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
195,136 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
56,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
5,847 |
|
|
|
65,722 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
121,037 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
(4,733 |
) |
|
|
129,414 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
21,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
24,423 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
41,089 |
|
|
|
10,273 |
|
|
|
7,428 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(3,264 |
) |
|
|
56,629 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
100,486 |
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
123,609 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
9,238 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
(3,442 |
) |
|
|
8,134 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
28,138 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
|
|
26,249 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,541,012 |
|
|
|
18,987 |
|
|
|
23,891 |
|
|
|
163,370 |
|
|
|
(36,940 |
) |
|
|
8,710,320 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
544,949 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Six Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
177,477 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
15,706 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
193,822 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
70,883 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
79,300 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
106,594 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
12,842 |
|
|
|
(5,184 |
) |
|
|
114,522 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
14,559 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
34,983 |
|
|
|
9,938 |
|
|
|
6,942 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
(3,381 |
) |
|
|
49,624 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
83,787 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
104,085 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
12,678 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
12,214 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
31,504 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
(5,777 |
) |
|
|
30,996 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,901,578 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
26,035 |
|
|
|
157,679 |
|
|
|
(8,325 |
) |
|
|
8,095,880 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
497,503 |
|
|
|
12,907 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,397 |
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Corporation uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain
financial assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for
sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to
time, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis,
such as mortgage loans held for sale, certain impaired loans, other real estate owned (OREO) and
certain other assets.
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. Fair value
is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the
asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure.
In determining fair value, the Corporation uses various valuation approaches, including
market, income and cost approaches. FAS 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring
fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, which are developed based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the Corporation. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Corporations assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability, which are developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances.
29
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The fair value hierarchy under FAS 157 is broken down
into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical instruments traded in
active
markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
valuation is based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets,
quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active
and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in
the market or can be corroborated by market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
valuation is derived from other valuation methodologies including discounted cash flow models
and similar techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market.
These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would
use in determining fair value. |
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for financial instruments recorded
at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis:
Securities Available For Sale
Securities available-for-sale consists of both debt and equity securities. These securities
are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2009, approximately 97.3% of these
securities used valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information,
collectively Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to measure fair value. The remaining 2.7% of these
securities were measured using model-based techniques, with primarily unobservable (Level 3)
inputs.
The Corporation closely monitors market conditions involving assets that have become less
actively traded. If the fair value measurement is based upon recent observable market activity of
such assets or comparable assets (other than forced or distressed transactions) that occur in
sufficient volume, and do not require significant adjustment using unobservable inputs, those
assets are classified as Level 1 or Level 2; if not, they are classified as Level 3. Making this
assessment requires significant judgment.
The Corporation uses prices from independent pricing services and to a lesser extent,
indicative (non-binding) quotes from independent brokers, to measure the fair value of investment
securities. The Corporation validates prices received from pricing services or brokers using a
variety of methods, including, but not limited to, comparison to secondary pricing services,
corroboration of pricing by reference to other independent market data such as secondary broker
quotes and relevant benchmark indices, and review of pricing by Corporate personnel familiar with
market liquidity and other market related conditions.
Valuation of its trust preferred debt securities is determined by the Corporation with the
assistance of a third-party independent financial consulting firm that specializes in advisory
services related to illiquid financial investments. The consulting firm provides the Corporation
fully-documented valuation reports based on consensus with the firm as to appropriate valuation
methodology, performance assumptions, modeling techniques, discounted cash flows, discount rates
and sensitivity analyses with respect to levels of defaults and deferrals necessary to produce
losses. Additionally, the Corporation utilizes the firms expertise to reassess assumptions to
reflect actual conditions. Accessing the services of a financial consulting firm with a focus on
financial instruments assists the Corporation in accurately valuing these complex financial
instruments and facilitates informed decision-making with respect to such instruments.
30
Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value for derivatives is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including
discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis
reflects contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity and uses observable
market based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
To comply with the provisions of FAS 157, the Corporation incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective
counterpartys non-performance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of
its derivative contracts for the effect of non-performance risk, the Corporation has considered the
impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds,
mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of June 30,
2009, the Corporation has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Corporation has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
These loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Under lower-of-cost-or-fair value
accounting, periodically, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments. Fair
value, when recorded, is generally based on independent quoted market prices and is classified as
Level 2. When observable inputs are not available, fair value is estimated based on the present
value of expected future cash flows using the Corporations best estimates of key assumptions. The
Corporation classifies residential mortgage loans held for sale that are valued in this manner as
Level 3 because significant unobservable inputs are used.
Impaired Loans
The Corporation reserves for commercial and commercial real estate loans that the Corporation
considers impaired as defined in FAS 114 at the time the Corporation identifies the loan as
impaired based upon the present value of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan, or
based upon the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs where a loan is collateral
dependent. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and
accounts receivable.
The Corporation determines the value of real estate based on appraisals by licensed or
certified appraisers. The value of business assets is generally based on amounts reported on the
businesss financial statements. Management must rely on the financial statements prepared and
certified by the borrower or its accountants in determining the value of these business assets on
an ongoing basis which may be subject to significant change over time. Based on the quality of
information or statements provided, management may require the use of business asset appraisals and
site-inspections to better value these assets. The Corporation may discount appraised and reported
values based on managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of
valuation or managements knowledge of the borrower and the borrowers business. Since not all
valuation inputs are observable, the Corporation classifies these nonrecurring fair value
determinations as Level 2 or Level 3 based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement.
The Corporation reviews and evaluates impaired loans no less frequently than quarterly for
additional impairment based on the same factors identified above.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO is comprised of commercial and residential real estate properties obtained in partial or
total satisfaction of loan obligations plus some bank owned real estate. OREO acquired in
settlement of indebtedness is recorded at the lower of carrying amount of the loan or fair value
less costs to sell. Subsequently, these assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair
value less costs to sell. Accordingly, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value
adjustments. Fair value, when recorded, is generally based upon appraisals by licensed or
certified appraisers and is classified as Level 2.
31
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
618,090 |
|
|
$ |
17,026 |
|
|
$ |
636,182 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
631,338 |
|
|
$ |
17,026 |
|
|
$ |
649,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which the Corporation has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
18,205 |
|
|
$ |
23,394 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(312 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(6,003 |
) |
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
17,026 |
|
|
$ |
17,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation reviews fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in
the observability of the valuation attributes may result in reclassification of certain financial
assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out of Level 3 at fair
value at the beginning of the period in which the changes occur.
The amount of total losses included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June
30, 2009 is $0.3 million. This loss is included in net impairment losses on securities reported as
a component of non-interest income.
In accordance with GAAP, from time to time, the Corporation measures certain assets at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application
of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Valuation
methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments were previously described. For assets
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the first six months of 2009 that were still
held in the balance sheet at June 30, 2009, the following table provides the hierarchy level and
the fair value of the related assets or portfolios (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,607 |
|
|
$ |
3,584 |
|
|
$ |
25,191 |
|
|
$ |
5,979 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,354 |
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
30,303 |
|
|
$ |
7,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Impaired loans measured or re-measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the first
six months of 2009 had a carrying amount of $29.0 million and an allocated allowance for loan
losses of $7.1 million at June 30, 2009. The allocated allowance is based on fair value of $25.2
million less estimated costs to sell of $3.3 million. The allowance for loan losses includes a
provision applicable to the current period fair value measurements of $6.0 million which was
included in the provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
OREO with a carrying amount of $7.0 million were written down to $5.1 million (fair value of
$5.8 million less estimated costs to sell of $0.7 million), resulting in a loss of $1.9 million,
which was included in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
$ |
494,479 |
|
|
$ |
494,479 |
|
|
$ |
172,203 |
|
|
$ |
172,203 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
636,182 |
|
|
|
636,182 |
|
|
|
482,270 |
|
|
|
482,270 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
766,543 |
|
|
|
778,183 |
|
|
|
843,863 |
|
|
|
851,251 |
|
Net loans, including loans held
for sale |
|
|
5,694,401 |
|
|
|
5,722,254 |
|
|
|
5,726,358 |
|
|
|
5,733,157 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
204,497 |
|
|
|
204,497 |
|
|
|
217,737 |
|
|
|
217,737 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
28,214 |
|
|
|
28,214 |
|
|
|
29,838 |
|
|
|
29,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
6,288,693 |
|
|
|
6,333,141 |
|
|
|
6,054,623 |
|
|
|
6,089,424 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
540,573 |
|
|
|
540,573 |
|
|
|
596,263 |
|
|
|
596,263 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
436,595 |
|
|
|
447,146 |
|
|
|
490,250 |
|
|
|
502,713 |
|
Junior subordinated debt owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts |
|
|
205,049 |
|
|
|
112,861 |
|
|
|
205,386 |
|
|
|
107,062 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
11,352 |
|
|
|
11,352 |
|
|
|
12,732 |
|
|
|
12,732 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each financial
instrument:
Cash and Due from Banks, Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable. For these
short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities. For both securities available for sale and securities held to maturity, fair value
equals the quoted market price from an active market, if available, and is classified within Level
1. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices
for similar securities or pricing models, and is classified as Level 2. Where there is limited
market activity or significant valuation inputs are unobservable, securities are classified within
Level 3. Under current market conditions, assumptions used to determine the fair value of Level 3
securities have greater subjectivity due to the lack of observable market transactions.
Loans. The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using
the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and
for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of variable and adjustable rate loans
approximates the carrying amount.
Bank Owned Life Insurance. The Corporation owns both general account and separate account bank
owned life insurance (BOLI). The fair value of general account BOLI is based on the insurance
contract cash surrender value. The fair value of separate account BOLI equals the quoted market
price of the underlying securities, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair
value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. In connection with the
separate account BOLI, the Corporation has purchased a stable value protection product that
mitigates the impact of market value fluctuations of the underlying separate account assets.
33
Deposits. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity deposits is
estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
Short-Term Borrowings. The carrying amounts for short-term borrowings approximate fair value for
amounts that mature in 90 days or less. The fair value of subordinated notes is estimated by
discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered.
Long-Term and Junior Subordinated Debt. The fair value of long-term and junior subordinated debt
is estimated by discounting future cash flows based on the market prices for the same or similar
issues or on the current rates offered to the Corporation for debt of the same remaining
maturities.
Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit. Estimates of the fair value of these off-balance
sheet items were not made because of the short-term nature of these arrangements and the credit
standing of the counterparties. Also, unfunded loan commitments relate principally to variable
rate commercial loans, typically non-binding, and fees are not normally assessed on these balances.
34
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
F.N.B. Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of F.N.B. Corporation and subsidiaries
(F.N.B. Corporation) as of June 30, 2009, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated
statements of shareholders equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of F.N.B. Corporations management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of F.N.B. Corporation as of
December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated February 25,
2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
August 10, 2009
35
PART I.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Managements discussion and analysis represents an overview of the consolidated results of
operations and financial condition of the Corporation and highlights material changes to the
financial condition and results of operations at and for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto. The Corporations results of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009.
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which statements generally can be identified by
the use of forward-looking terminology, such as may, will, expect, estimate, anticipate,
believe, target, plan, project or continue or the negatives thereof or other variations
thereon or similar terminology, and are made on the basis of managements current plans and
analyses of the Corporation, its business and the industry as a whole. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic
conditions, competition, interest rate sensitivity and exposure to regulatory and legislative
changes. The above factors in some cases could affect the Corporations financial performance and
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such
forward-looking statements. The Corporation does not undertake to update or revise its
forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that the Corporation
will not realize any projected results expressed or implied therein.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of the Corporations critical accounting policies is included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
the Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading Application of Critical
Accounting Policies. There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies since
the year ended December 31, 2008, other than Goodwill, which is summarized below.
Goodwill
In accordance with the Corporations annual review policy, its annual goodwill impairment
analysis is conducted in September. Due to market conditions surrounding the banking industry, the
Corporation updated its impairment analysis as of December 31, 2008 and at March 31, 2009. Based
on the results of these reviews, the Corporation concluded that the estimated fair value of each
reporting unit at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 exceeded its respective
carrying value; therefore, the Corporation determined there was no impairment of goodwill at those
dates.
At June 30, 2009, total goodwill was $529.1 million, of which $510.3 million relates to the
Corporations Community Banking segment. Because adverse market conditions and risks and
uncertainties in the market continued during the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation updated
its review for goodwill impairment at June 30, 2009 for its Community Banking segment. To
determine the fair value of the Community Banking reporting unit, the
Corporation utilized an income approach (discounted
cash flows). This approach is based on discounted cash flows derived from assumptions
of balance sheet and income statement activity. It also factors in costs of equity and
weighted-average costs of capital to determine an appropriate discount rate. Applying this
methodology, the degree by which the fair value of the Community Banking reporting unit exceeded
its carrying value at June 30, 2009 was approximately 36%.
The financial services industry and securities markets continue to be adversely affected by
declining values of nearly all asset classes. If current economic conditions continue to result in
a prolonged period of economic weakness, the Corporations business segments, including the
Community Banking segment, may be adversely affected, which may result in impairment of goodwill
and other intangibles in the future. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse
impact on the Corporations financial condition and its results of operations.
36
UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT CAPITAL PURCHASE PROGRAM
In connection with the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), the UST
implemented a CPP allowing qualifying financial institutions to issue preferred stock to the UST,
subject to certain limitations and terms. The CPP is a voluntary program that was developed to
attract participation by strong financial institutions to help restore stability and liquidity to
the financial system.
On
January 9, 2009, the Corporation issued to the UST 100,000 shares of Preferred Series C
Stock and a warrant to purchase up to 1,302,083 shares (pursuant to Section 13(H) of the Warrant to
Purchase Common Stock, the number of shares of common stock
purchasable upon exercise of the warrant was reduced in half to 651,041.5 shares
as of June 16, 2009, the date of the Corporations recently completed public offering) of the
Corporations common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100.0 million. The warrant has a
ten-year term and an exercise price of $11.52 per share. The Preferred Series C Stock ranks senior
to the Corporations common shares and pays a cumulative dividend of 5% per year for the first five
years and 9% per year thereafter. The dividends on the Preferred Series C Stock are payable
quarterly on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year. In the event dividends
on the Preferred Series C Stock are not paid in full for six dividend periods, whether or not
consecutive, the UST will have the right to elect two directors to the Corporations Board of
Directors. This right will end when all accrued and unpaid dividends to the UST on the Preferred
Series C Stock have been paid in full. The Corporation plans to redeem the UST investment as
quickly as prudently possible, subject to approval by its primary banking regulator.
The CPP also requires the Corporation to comply with a number of restrictions and provisions,
including standards for executive compensation and corporate governance as well as limitations on
share repurchases and the declaration and payment of dividends on common shares, so long as the UST
owns any of the Corporations debt or equity securities acquired in connection with the issuance of
the Preferred Series C Stock. The UST may amend the restrictions and provisions relating to the
CPP to the extent required to comply with any changes to the applicable federal statutes. Any such
amendments may provide for additional executive compensation and corporate governance standards or
modifications to the existing standards.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Hermitage,
Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance, wealth
management and insurance. The Corporation also conducts leasing and merchant banking activities.
The Corporation operates its community banking business through a full service branch network with
offices in Pennsylvania and Ohio and loan production offices in Pennsylvania, Florida and
Tennessee. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance businesses within the
community banking branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance business in
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee.
On June 16, 2009, the Corporation completed its public offering of 24,150,000 shares of common
stock at a price of $5.50 per share, including 3,150,000 shares of common stock purchased by the
underwriters pursuant to an over-allotment option, which the underwriters exercised in full. The
net proceeds of the offering after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses were $125.8 million.
On April 1, 2008, the Corporation completed the acquisition of Omega, a diversified financial
services company with $1.8 billion in assets, and on August 16, 2008, the Corporation completed the
acquisition of IRGB, a bank holding company with $301.7 million in assets. The assets and
liabilities of each of these acquired companies were recorded on the Corporations balance sheet at
their fair values as of each of the acquisition dates, and their results of operations have been
included in the Corporations consolidated statement of income since the respective acquisition
dates.
Because the Corporation issued Preferred Series C Stock to the UST in January 2009, the
Corporation now reports net income available to common shareholders, which is net income adjusted
for the preferred stock dividend and discount amortization requirements.
37
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $26.2 million, compared to net income
for the same period of 2008 of $31.0 million. Net income available to common shareholders for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 was $23.4 million or $0.26 per diluted share, compared to net income
available to common shareholders for the same period of 2008 of $31.0 million or $0.42 per diluted
share. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporations return on average equity was
5.11% and its return on average assets was 0.62%, compared to 8.43% and 0.88%, respectively, for
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
In addition to evaluating its results of operations in accordance with GAAP, the Corporation
routinely supplements its evaluation with an analysis of certain non-GAAP financial measures, such
as return on average tangible equity, return on average tangible common equity and return on
average tangible assets. The Corporation believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide
information useful to investors in understanding the Corporations operating performance and
trends, and facilitates comparisons with the performance of the Corporations peers.
The following tables summarize the Corporations non-GAAP financial measures for the
year-to-date periods indicated derived from amounts reported in the Corporations financial
statements (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Return on average tangible equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
52,934 |
|
|
$ |
62,333 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,689 |
|
|
$ |
65,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,035,060 |
|
|
$ |
739,364 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(573,328 |
) |
|
|
(382,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
461,732 |
|
|
$ |
357,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible equity |
|
|
12.49 |
% |
|
|
18.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders (annualized) |
|
$ |
47,263 |
|
|
$ |
62,333 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,018 |
|
|
$ |
65,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,035,060 |
|
|
$ |
739,364 |
|
Less: Average preferred stockholders equity |
|
|
(91,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(573,328 |
) |
|
|
(382,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
370,440 |
|
|
$ |
357,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity |
|
|
14.04 |
% |
|
|
18.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
52,934 |
|
|
$ |
62,333 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,689 |
|
|
$ |
65,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
$ |
8,519,266 |
|
|
$ |
7,046,665 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(573,328 |
) |
|
|
(382,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,945,938 |
|
|
$ |
6,664,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on
interest earning assets and the average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
2,749 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
$ |
3,923 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
28,453 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
22,240 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
Taxable investment securities (1) |
|
|
1,137,988 |
|
|
|
25,595 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
945,313 |
|
|
|
22,945 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
Non-taxable investment securities (2) |
|
|
181,707 |
|
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
177,809 |
|
|
|
4,917 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
5,816,857 |
|
|
|
167,234 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
5,001,312 |
|
|
|
168,537 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets (2) |
|
|
7,167,754 |
|
|
|
198,181 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
6,150,597 |
|
|
|
196,693 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
329,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(106,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
122,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,006,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,519,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,046,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
2,106,648 |
|
|
|
7,649 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
1,670,006 |
|
|
|
12,921 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
Savings |
|
|
849,719 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
683,190 |
|
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
Certificates and other time |
|
|
2,302,995 |
|
|
|
37,271 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
1,982,789 |
|
|
|
39,358 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
444,070 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
330,530 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
104,165 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
149,356 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
460,187 |
|
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
498,747 |
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
205,214 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
|
178,419 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities (2) |
|
|
6,472,998 |
|
|
|
65,722 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
5,493,037 |
|
|
|
79,300 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
|
916,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
94,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,484,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,307,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,035,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,519,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,046,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of interest earning assets over
interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
694,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
657,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances and yields earned on securities are based on historical cost. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income amounts are reflected on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis which
adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the
federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The yields on earning assets and
the net interest margin are presented on an FTE and annualized basis. The rates paid on
interest bearing liabilities are also presented on an annualized basis. The Corporation
believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and
provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans consist of average total loans less
average unearned income. The amount of loan fees included in interest income on loans is
immaterial. |
39
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which is the Corporations principal source of revenue, is the difference
between interest income from earning assets (loans, securities and federal funds sold) and interest
expense paid on liabilities (deposits, treasury management accounts and short- and long-term
borrowings). For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net interest income, which comprised 69.6% of
net revenue (net interest income plus non-interest income) compared to 69.8% for the same period in
2008, was affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in interest rates, the shape of
the yield curve, the level of non-accrual loans and changes in the amount and mix of interest
earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
Net interest income, on an FTE basis, increased $15.1 million or 12.8% from $117.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 to $132.5 million for the same period of 2009. Average interest
earning assets increased $1.0 billion or 16.5% and average interest bearing liabilities increased
$1.0 billion or 17.8% from the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to organic loan and deposit
growth and the Omega and IRGB acquisitions. The Corporations net interest margin decreased from
3.83% for the first six months of 2008 to 3.71% for the first six months of 2009 as loan yields
declined faster than deposit rates, reflecting the actions taken by the FRB to lower interest rates
during the fourth quarter of 2008 combined with competitive pressures on deposit rates. Details on
changes in tax equivalent net interest income attributed to changes in interest earning assets,
interest bearing liabilities, yields and cost of funds are set forth in the preceding table.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income
attributable to changes in the volumes of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
and changes in the rates for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Securities |
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
2,955 |
|
Loans |
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
(25,437 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,265 |
|
|
|
(26,777 |
) |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
(8,200 |
) |
|
|
(5,272 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
(2,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,680 |
) |
Certificates and other time |
|
|
5,963 |
|
|
|
(8,050 |
) |
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
(2,940 |
) |
|
|
(1,833 |
) |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(901 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,131 |
|
|
|
(23,709 |
) |
|
|
(13,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
|
$ |
18,134 |
|
|
$ |
(3,068 |
) |
|
$ |
15,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated
between the change due to rate and the change due to volume based on the net size of
the rate and volume changes. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis which adjusts for the
tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The Corporation believes this
measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides
relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
Interest income, on an FTE basis, of $198.2 million for the first six months of 2009
increased by $1.5 million or 0.8% from the same period of 2008. Average interest earning assets of
$7.2 billion for the first six months of 2009 grew $1.0 billion or 16.5% from the same period of
2008 primarily driven by the Omega and IRGB acquisitions which increased loans by $1.1 billion and
$160.2 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition. The Corporation also recognized organic
average loan growth of $83.1 million or 1.7% for the first six months of 2009 compared to the same
period of 2008. The yield on interest earning assets decreased 87 basis points from the six months
ended June 30, 2008
40
to 5.55% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting changes in interest rates as the
FRB has lowered its federal funds target rate from 4.25% at the beginning of 2008 to a current
range of 0.00% to 0.25%.
Interest expense of $65.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $13.6
million or 17.1% from the same period of 2008. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities
decreased 85 basis points to 2.05% during the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six
months of 2008, reflecting changes in interest rates and a favorable shift in mix. Average
interest bearing liabilities increased $1.0 billion or 17.8% to average $6.5 billion for the first
six months of 2009. This growth was primarily attributable to the Omega and IRGB acquisitions
combined with organic growth. The Omega and IRGB acquisitions increased deposits by $1.3 billion
and $256.8 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition. The Corporation also recognized
organic average deposit and treasury management account growth of $313.1 million or 5.8% for the
first six months of 2009, compared to the first six months of 2008 driven by success with ongoing
marketing campaigns designed to attract new customers to the Corporations local approach to
banking combined with customer preferences to keep funds in banks due to uncertainties in the
market.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is determined based on managements estimates of the appropriate
level of allowance for loan losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the existing loan
portfolio, after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period.
The provision for loan losses of $24.4 million during the first six months of 2009 increased
$9.9 million from the same period in 2008 due to higher net charge-offs and increased allocations
for a weaker economic environment. The significant increases primarily reflect continued weakness
in the Corporations Florida portfolio, and, to a much lesser extent, the slowing economy in
Pennsylvania. The $24.4 million provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2009 was
comprised of $14.2 million relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $3.1 million relating to Regency and
$7.1 million relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio, which is predominantly in
Pennsylvania. During the first six months of 2009, net charge-offs were $29.8 million or 1.03%
(annualized) of average loans compared to $7.1 million or 0.29% (annualized) of average loans for
the same period in 2008. The net charge-offs for the first six months of 2009 were comprised of
$19.4 million or 13.51% (annualized) of average loans relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $3.2
million or 4.12% (annualized) of average loans relating to Regency and $7.2 million or 0.27%
(annualized) of average loans relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio. For
additional information relating to the allowance and provision for loan losses, refer to the
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income of $56.6 million for the first six months of 2009 increased $7.0
million or 14.1% from the same period of 2008. This increase resulted primarily from increases in
all major fee businesses reflecting organic growth and the impact of acquisitions combined with a
gain on the sale of a building acquired in a previous acquisition and gains on the sale of
residential mortgage loans, partially offset by a decrease in gain on the sale of securities.
These items are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Service charges on loans and deposits of $28.2 million for the first six months of 2009
increased $3.1 million or 12.6% from the same period of 2008, reflecting organic growth and the
expansion of the Corporations customer base as a result of the Omega and IRGB acquisitions during
2008.
Insurance commissions and fees of $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
increased $0.8 million or 10.0% from the same period of 2008 primarily as a result of the
acquisition of Omega during 2008.
Securities commissions of $3.8 million for the first six months of 2009 increased by $0.2
million or 4.9% from the same period of 2008 primarily due to the acquisition of Omega during 2008
and an increase in annuity revenue due to a favorable interest rate environment, partially offset
by lower activity due to market conditions and the conversion to a new broker/dealer.
Trust fees of $5.9 million for the first six months of 2009 increased by $0.1 million or 2.3%
from the same period of 2008 due to growth in assets under management resulting from the Omega
acquisition during 2008, partially offset by the negative effect of market conditions on assets
under management.
41
Income from bank owned life insurance of $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
increased by $0.2 million or 5.7% from the same period of 2008. This increase was primarily
attributable to the Omega and IRGB acquisitions in 2008, partially offset by lower yields resulting
from the low interest rate environment.
Gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans of $1.7 million for the first six months of
2009 increased by $0.7 million or 70.8% from the same period of 2008 due to a higher volume of loan
sales. For the first six months of 2009, the Corporation sold $113.2 million of residential
mortgage loans compared to $60.5 million for the same period of 2008.
Gain on the sale of securities of $0.3 million for the first six months of 2009 decreased $0.5
million or 56.7% from the same period of 2008 as management did not sell as many equity securities
during 2009 due to unfavorable market prices for the bank stock portfolio. During 2008, most of the
gain related to the Visa, Inc. initial public offering. The Corporation is a member of Visa USA
since it issues Visa debit cards. As such, a portion of the Corporations ownership interest in
Visa was redeemed in the first quarter of 2008 in exchange for $0.7 million. This entire amount
was recorded as gain on sale of securities since the Corporations cost basis in Visa is zero.
Net impairment losses on securities of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
increased by $0.5 million from the same period of 2008 due to impairment losses during 2009 of $0.3
million related to investments in pooled trust preferred securities and $0.6 million related to
investments in bank stocks.
Other income of $5.7 million for the first six months of 2009 increased $2.8 million or 98.0%
from the same period of 2008. The primary reason for this increase was a gain of $0.8 million on
the sale of a building acquired in a previous acquisition, combined with an increase of $0.7
million in fees earned through an interest rate swap program for larger commercial customers who
desire fixed rate loans while the Corporation benefits from a variable rate asset, thereby helping
to reduce volatility in its net interest income. Additionally, the Corporation recognized $0.7
million more in gains relating to payments received on impaired loans acquired in previous
acquisitions.
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense of $127.2 million for the first six months of 2009 increased $20.9
million or 19.6% from the same period of 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to
operating expenses resulting from the Omega and IRGB acquisitions in 2008 combined with increases
in salaries and employee benefits resulting from costs associated with a former executive and
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance resulting from a one-time special assessment
and an increase in assessment rates.
Salaries and employee benefits of $63.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
increased $6.1 million or 10.7% from the same period of 2008. This increase was primarily
attributable to the acquisitions of Omega and IRGB during 2008 combined with $2.3 million in
additional pension expense during the first six months of 2009 as a result of an increase in the
actuarial valuation amount.
Combined net occupancy and equipment expense of $19.5 million for the first six months of 2009
increased $3.5 million or 21.7% from the combined level for the same period in 2008, primarily due
to the Omega and IRGB acquisitions during 2008.
Amortization of intangibles expense of $3.6 million for the first six months of 2009 increased
$1.3 million or 58.3% from the same period of 2008 due to higher intangible balances resulting from
the Omega and IRGB acquisitions during 2008.
Outside services expense of $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased
$1.7 million or 16.8% from the same period in 2008 primarily due to the Omega and IRGB acquisitions
during 2008, combined with higher fees for professional services, including legal fees incurred for
loan workout efforts.
FDIC insurance of $8.6 million for the first six months of 2009 increased $8.2 million from
the same period of 2008 due to a one-time special assessment of $4.0 million paid during the second
quarter of 2009, combined with an increase in FDIC insurance premium rates for 2009 and FNBPA
having utilized its FDIC insurance premium credits in prior periods.
42
Other non-interest expenses remained stable at $19.9 million for both the first six months of
2009 and the first six months of 2008. During the first six months of 2008, the Corporation
recorded merger-related expenses of $3.6 million relating to the acquisition of Omega. Additional
operating costs during the first six months of 2009 associated with the Corporations acquisitions
of Omega and IRGB in 2008 were offset by the decrease in merger-related expense.
Income Taxes
The Corporations income tax expense of $8.1 million for the first six months of 2009
decreased $4.1 million or 33.4% from the same period of 2008. The effective tax rate of 23.7% for
the first six months of 2009 declined from 28.3% for the same period of 2008, primarily due to
lower taxable income for the first six months of 2009. Income taxes and the effective tax rate for
both the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were favorably impacted by $0.2 million due to the
resolution of previously uncertain tax positions. The lower effective tax rate reflects benefits
resulting from tax-exempt income on investments, loans and bank owned life insurance. Both
periods tax rates are lower than the 35.0% federal statutory tax rate due to the tax benefits
primarily resulting from tax-exempt instruments and excludable dividend income.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $10.6 million, compared to net income for
the same period of 2008 of $14.5 million. Net income available to common shareholders for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 was $9.1 million or $0.10 per diluted share, compared to net
income available to common shareholders for the same period of 2008 of $14.5 million or $0.17 per
diluted share. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporations return on average
equity was 4.05% and return on average assets was 0.49%, compared to 6.26% and 0.73%, respectively,
for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
The following tables summarize the Corporations non-GAAP financial measures for the quarterly
periods indicated derived from amounts reported in the Corporations financial statements (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Return on average tangible equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
42,508 |
|
|
$ |
58,337 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,727 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,235 |
|
|
$ |
61,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,049,464 |
|
|
$ |
932,530 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(572,701 |
) |
|
|
(503,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
476,763 |
|
|
$ |
428,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible equity |
|
|
9.91 |
% |
|
|
14.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders (annualized) |
|
$ |
36,616 |
|
|
$ |
58,337 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,727 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,343 |
|
|
$ |
61,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,049,464 |
|
|
$ |
932,530 |
|
Less: Average preferred stockholders equity |
|
|
(95,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(572,701 |
) |
|
|
(503,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
381,374 |
|
|
$ |
428,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity |
|
|
10.84 |
% |
|
|
14.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Return on average tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
42,508 |
|
|
$ |
58,337 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,727 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,235 |
|
|
$ |
61,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
$ |
8,604,059 |
|
|
$ |
7,989,171 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(572,701 |
) |
|
|
(503,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,031,358 |
|
|
$ |
7,485,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on
interest earning assets and the average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
$ |
6,406 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
45,055 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
44,183 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
Taxable investment securities (1) |
|
|
1,146,473 |
|
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
1,062,709 |
|
|
|
12,504 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
Non-taxable investment securities (2) |
|
|
175,369 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
175,953 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
5,808,867 |
|
|
|
83,327 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
5,594,922 |
|
|
|
91,633 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets (2) |
|
|
7,178,615 |
|
|
|
98,524 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
6,884,173 |
|
|
|
106,903 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
408,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(106,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
121,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,002,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,604,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,989,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
2,183,606 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
1,880,726 |
|
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
Savings |
|
|
865,549 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
779,431 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
Certificates and other time |
|
|
2,290,536 |
|
|
|
17,984 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
2,223,657 |
|
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
434,259 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
367,502 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
101,249 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
127,630 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
445,450 |
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
520,579 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
205,131 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
|
205,806 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities (2) |
|
|
6,525,780 |
|
|
|
31,702 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
6,105,331 |
|
|
|
39,740 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
|
934,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
870,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
94,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,554,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,056,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,049,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
932,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,604,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,989,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of interest earning assets over
interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
652,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
778,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances and yields earned on securities are based on historical cost. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income amounts are reflected on a FTE basis which adjusts for the tax benefit of
income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%
for each period presented. The yields on earning assets and the net interest margin are
presented on an FTE and annualized basis. The rates paid on interest bearing liabilities are
also presented on an annualized basis. The Corporation believes this measure to be the
preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between
taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans consist of average total loans less
average unearned income. The amount of loan fees included in interest income on loans is
immaterial. |
45
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which is the Corporations principal source of revenue, is the difference
between interest income from earning assets and interest expense paid on liabilities. For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, net interest income, which comprised 69.7% of net revenue (net
interest income plus non-interest income) compared to 70.5% for the same period in 2008, was
affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in interest rates, the shape of the yield
curve, the level of non-accrual loans and changes in the amount and mix of interest earning assets
and interest bearing liabilities.
Net interest income, on an FTE basis, decreased $0.3 million from $67.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 to $66.8 million for the same period of 2009. Average interest earning
assets increased $294.4 million or 4.3% and average interest bearing liabilities increased $420.4
million or 6.9% from the three months ended June 30, 2008 due to organic loan and deposit growth
and the IRGB acquisition. The Corporations net interest margin decreased from 3.92% for the
second quarter of 2008 to 3.73% for the second quarter of 2009 as loan yields declined faster than
deposit rates, reflecting the actions taken by the FRB to lower interest rates during the fourth
quarter of 2008 combined with competitive pressures on deposit rates. Details on changes in tax
equivalent net interest income attributed to changes in interest earning assets, interest bearing
liabilities, yields and cost of funds are set forth in the preceding table.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income
attributable to changes in the volumes of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
and changes in the rates for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Securities |
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
(11,132 |
) |
|
|
(8,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
(12,025 |
) |
|
|
(8,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
(3,599 |
) |
|
|
(2,338 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
Certificates and other time |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
(3,363 |
) |
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
(793 |
) |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(872 |
) |
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
(9,746 |
) |
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
(2,279 |
) |
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated
between the change due to rate and the change due to volume based on the net size of
the rate and volume changes. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis which adjusts for the
tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The Corporation believes this
measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides
relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
Interest income, on an FTE basis, of $98.5 million for the second quarter of 2009
decreased by $8.4 million or 7.8% from the same period of 2008 as growth on average interest
earning assets was offset by a lower net interest margin. Average interest earning assets of $7.2
billion for the second quarter of 2009 grew $294.4 million or 4.3% from the same period of 2008
primarily driven by the IRGB acquisition which increased loans by $160.2 million at the time of
acquisition. The Corporation also recognized organic average loan growth of $53.7 million or 1.0%
for the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. The yield on interest earning
assets decreased 74 basis points from the three months ended June 30, 2008 to 5.50% for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting
46
changes in interest rates as the FRB has lowered its federal
funds target rate from 4.25% at the beginning of 2008 to a current range of 0.00% to 0.25%.
Interest expense of $31.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $8.0
million or 20.2% from the same period of 2008. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities
decreased 66 basis points to 1.95% during the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter
of 2008, reflecting changes in interest rates and a favorable shift in mix. Average interest
bearing liabilities increased $420.4 million or 6.9% to average $6.5 billion for the second quarter
of 2009. This growth was primarily attributable to the IRGB acquisition combined with organic
growth. The IRGB acquisition increased deposits by $256.8 million at the time of acquisition. The
Corporation also recognized organic average deposit and treasury management account growth of
$328.3 million or 5.36% for the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2008
driven by success with ongoing marketing campaigns designed to attract new customers to the
Corporations local approach to banking combined with customer preferences to keep funds in banks
due to uncertainties in the market.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is determined based on managements estimates of the appropriate
level of allowance for loan losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the existing loan
portfolio, after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period.
The provision for loan losses of $13.9 million during the second quarter of 2009 increased
$2.9 million from the same period in 2008 due to higher net charge-offs and increased allocations
for a weaker economic environment. The increase primarily reflects continued weakness in the
Corporations Florida portfolio, and, to a lesser extent, the slowing economy in Pennsylvania. The
$13.9 million provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2009 was comprised of $7.2
million relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $1.7 million relating to Regency and $5.0 million
relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio, which is predominantly in Pennsylvania.
During the second quarter of 2009, net charge-offs were $17.6 million or 1.22% (annualized) of
average loans compared to $4.1 million or 0.30% (annualized) of average loans for the same period
in 2008. The net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2009 were comprised of $11.2 million or
15.60% (annualized) of average loans relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $1.5 million or 3.99%
(annualized) of average loans relating to Regency and $4.9 million or 0.36% (annualized) of average
loans relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio. For additional information
relating to the allowance and provision for loan losses, refer to the Allowance and Provision for
Loan Losses section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income of $28.5 million for the second quarter of 2009 increased $1.0
million or 3.6% from the same period of 2008. This increase resulted primarily from higher other
non-interest income and gains on sales of residential mortgage loans, partially offset by decreases
in the revenue from all major fee categories due to the market conditions. These items are further
explained in the following paragraphs.
Service charges on loans and deposits of $14.6 million for the second quarter of 2009
decreased $0.3 million or 1.8% from the same period of 2008, reflecting the market conditions.
Insurance commissions and fees of $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased $0.3 million or 8.3% from the same period of 2008 due to contingent revenue timing and
commission revenue due to an accrual in 2008.
Securities commissions of $2.0 million for the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $0.1
million or 4.3% from the same period of 2008 primarily due to lower activity given the market
conditions combined with the conversion to a new broker/dealer.
Trust fees of $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $0.6 million or 15.7%
from the same period of 2008 primarily due to the negative effect of market conditions on assets
under management combined with the recognition of one-time estate revenue of $0.1 million from
Omega in 2008.
Income from bank owned life insurance of $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased by $0.3 million or 17.0% from the same period of 2008. This decrease was primarily
attributable to death claims, lower yields and a $13.7 million withdrawal from the policy due to
the unfavorable market conditions during the second quarter of 2009.
47
Gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans of $1.1 million for the second quarter of 2009
increased by $0.6 million or 114.9% from the same period of 2008 due to a higher volume of loan
sales. For the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation sold $70.0 million of residential mortgage
loans compared to $32.4 million for the same period of 2008.
Net impairment losses on securities of $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
increased by $0.3 million from the same period of 2008 due to impairment losses during the second
quarter of 2009 of $0.3 million related to investments in pooled trust preferred securities and
$0.4 million related to investments in bank stocks.
Other income of $3.1 million for the second quarter of 2009 increased $2.2 million or 248.4%
from the same period of 2008. The primary reason for this increase was increases of $1.0 million
in fees earned through an interest rate swap program for larger commercial customers who desire
fixed rate loans while the Corporation benefits from a variable rate asset, thereby helping to
reduce volatility in its net interest income and $0.6 million in gains relating to payments
received on impaired loans acquired in previous acquisitions, partially offset by an increase of
$0.1 million in dividends on non-marketable equity securities.
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense of $66.3 million for the second quarter of 2009 increased $4.3
million or 6.9% from the same period of 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to a $6.4
million increase in FDIC insurance, including the payment of a special FDIC assessment of $4.0
million during the second quarter of 2009.
Salaries and employee benefits of $31.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased $0.7 million or 2.2% from the same period of 2008. This decrease was primarily
attributable to accruals relating to the retirement of FNBPAs Chief Executive Officer and Omega related costs during
the second quarter of 2008, partially offset by higher pension costs resulting from an increase in
the actuarial valuation amount during the second quarter of 2009.
Combined net occupancy and equipment expense of $9.5 million for the second quarter of 2009
increased $0.3 million or 3.6% from the combined level for the same period in 2008, primarily due
to the IRGB acquisition during 2008.
Amortization of intangibles expense of $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2009 increased
$0.6 million or 48.7% from the same period of 2008 primarily due to higher intangible balances
resulting from the IRGB acquisition during 2008.
Outside services expense of $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased
$0.6 million or 10.5% from the same period in 2008 primarily due to the IRGB acquisition during
2008, combined with higher fees for professional services, including legal fees related to loan
workout efforts.
FDIC insurance of $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $6.4 million
from the same period of 2008 due to a one-time special assessment of $4.0 million paid during the
second quarter of 2009, combined with an increase in FDIC insurance premium rates for 2009 and
FNBPA having utilized its FDIC insurance premium credits in prior periods.
Other non-interest expenses of $10.3 million for the second quarter of 2009 decreased $3.0
million or 22.7% from the same period of 2008. This decrease is primarily the result of
merger-related expenses of $3.6 million relating to the acquisition of Omega recorded by the
Corporation during the second quarter of 2008, partially offset by an increase in OREO expense of
$0.6 million during the second quarter of 2009 relating to increased foreclosure activity and
write-downs of OREO property, particularly in the Florida market.
Income Taxes
The Corporations income tax expense of $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2009 decreased
$2.5 million or 45.4% from the same period of 2008. The effective tax rate of 22.1% for the second
quarter of 2009 declined from 27.6% for the same period of 2008, primarily due to lower taxable
income for the second quarter of 2009. The lower effective tax rate reflects benefits resulting
from tax-exempt income on investments, loans and bank owned life
48
insurance. Both periods tax
rates are lower than the 35.0% federal statutory tax rate due to the tax benefits primarily
resulting from tax-exempt instruments and excludable dividend income.
LIQUIDITY
The Corporations goal in liquidity management is to satisfy the cash flow requirements of
depositors and borrowers as well as the operating cash needs of the Corporation with cost-effective
funding. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has established an Asset/Liability Policy in
order to achieve and maintain earnings performance consistent with long-term goals while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk, a well-capitalized balance sheet and
adequate levels of liquidity. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has also established a
Contingency Funding Policy to address liquidity crisis conditions. These policies designate the
Corporate Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives.
The ALCO, which includes members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a periodic basis and
approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions.
Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by the Corporations Treasury Department.
The principal sources of the parent companys liquidity are its strong existing cash resources
plus dividends it receives from its subsidiaries. These dividends may be impacted by the parents
or its subsidiaries capital needs, statutory laws and regulations, corporate policies, contractual
restrictions and other factors. Cash on hand at the parent at June 30, 2009 was $246.2 million, up
from $66.8 million at December 31, 2008, as the Corporation took a number of actions to bolster its
cash position. On January 9, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of 100,000 shares of newly
issued preferred stock valued at $100.0 million as part of the USTs CPP. Additionally, on January
21, 2009, the Corporations Board of Directors elected to reduce the common stock dividend rate
from $0.24 to $0.12 per quarter, thus reducing 2009s liquidity needs by approximately $43.1
million. Finally, on June 16, 2009, the Corporation completed a common stock offering that raised
$125.8 million in total capital, $38.0 million of which was invested in FNBPA at June 30, 2009.
The parent also may draw on an approved guidance line of credit with a major domestic bank. This
line was unused and totaled $25.0 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. In addition,
the Corporation also issues subordinated notes on a regular basis.
FNBPA generates liquidity from its normal business operations. Liquidity sources from assets
include payments from loans and investments as well as the ability to securitize, pledge or sell
loans, investment securities and other assets. Liquidity sources from liabilities are generated
primarily through the 225 banking offices of FNBPA in the form of deposits and treasury management
accounts. The Corporation also has access to reliable and cost-effective wholesale sources of
liquidity. Short-term and long-term funds can be acquired to help fund normal business operations
as well as serve as contingency funding in the event that the Corporation would be faced with a
liquidity crisis.
The recent financial market crisis, which began in 2007, escalated in the second half of 2008
and resulted in the UST, FRB and FDIC intervening with a number of programs designed to provide
liquidity, capital and increased deposit insurance to the U.S. financial system. The Corporation
has voluntarily elected to participate in a number of these programs, including the previously
mentioned USTs CPP program and the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP).
The liquidity position of the Corporation continues to be strong as evidenced by its ability
to generate strong growth in deposits and treasury management accounts. As a result, the
Corporation is less reliant on capital markets funding as witnessed by its ratio of total deposits
and treasury management accounts to total assets of 77.2% and 77.3% as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The Corporation had unused wholesale credit availability of $2.9
billion or 33.9% of total assets at June 30, 2009 and $2.7 billion or 32.9% of total assets at
December 31, 2008. These sources include the availability to borrow from the FHLB, the FRB,
correspondent bank lines and access to certificates of deposit issued through brokers. During the
first six months of 2009, the Corporation expanded its borrowing capacity at the FRB by
approximately $400.0 million by pledging additional loans as collateral. The Corporation also took
a number of actions to bolster liquidity throughout 2008. These actions included a $200.0 million
increase in federal fund lines, increased brokered CD capacity and becoming a participant in the
Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS) program operated by the Promontory
Interfinancial Network, LLC. Further, the Corporations election not to opt out of the FDICs TLGP
resulted in $140.0 million of increased funding availability.
The ALCO regularly monitors various liquidity ratios and forecasts of its liquidity position.
Management believes the Corporation has sufficient liquidity available to meet its normal operating
and contingency funding cash needs.
49
MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. The Corporation is susceptible to current and
future impairment charges on holdings in its investment portfolio. The Securities footnote
discusses the impairment charges taken during both 2009 and 2008 relating to the pooled trust
preferred securities and bank stock portfolios. The Securities footnote also discusses the ongoing
process management utilizes to determine whether impairment exists.
The Corporation is primarily exposed to interest rate risk inherent in its lending and
deposit-taking activities as a financial intermediary. To succeed in this capacity, the
Corporation offers an extensive variety of financial products to meet the diverse needs of its
customers. These products sometimes contribute to interest rate risk for the Corporation when
product groups do not complement one another. For example, depositors may want short-term deposits
while borrowers desire long-term loans.
Changes in market interest rates may result in changes in the fair value of the Corporations
financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. The ALCO is responsible for market risk
management: devising policy guidelines, risk measures and limits, and managing the amount of
interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. The Corporation uses
derivative financial instruments for interest rate risk management purposes and not for trading or
speculative purposes.
Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options
risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and
liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to
different market rate indexes, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk
arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield
curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from
embedded options within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to
prepay their loans when rates fall while certain depositors can redeem their certificates of
deposit early when rates rise.
The Corporation uses a sophisticated asset/liability model to measure its interest rate risk.
Interest rate risk measures utilized by the Corporation include earnings simulation, economic value
of equity (EVE) and gap analysis.
Gap analysis and EVE are static measures that do not incorporate assumptions regarding future
business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single
rate environment. EVEs long-term horizon helps identify changes in optionality and longer-term
positions. However, EVEs liquidation perspective does not translate into the earnings-based
measures that are the focus of managing and valuing a going concern. Net interest income
simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest.
In these simulations, the Corporations current financial position is combined with assumptions
regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate
scenarios. The ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate
scenarios on a periodic basis. Reviewing these various measures provides the Corporation with a
comprehensive view of its interest rate profile.
The following gap analysis compares the difference between the amount of interest earning
assets (IEA) and interest bearing liabilities (IBL) subject to repricing over a period of time. A
ratio of more than one indicates a higher level of repricing assets over repricing liabilities for
the time period. Conversely, a ratio of less than one indicates a higher level of repricing
liabilities over repricing assets for the time period.
50
The following table presents the amounts of IEA and IBL as of June 30, 2009 that are subject
to repricing within the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
2-3 |
|
|
4-6 |
|
|
7-12 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1 Month |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
1 Year |
|
Interest Earning Assets (IEA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,675,488 |
|
|
$ |
406,559 |
|
|
$ |
358,889 |
|
|
$ |
581,196 |
|
|
$ |
3,022,132 |
|
Investments |
|
|
282,415 |
|
|
|
104,370 |
|
|
|
157,480 |
|
|
|
315,613 |
|
|
|
859,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,957,903 |
|
|
|
510,929 |
|
|
|
516,369 |
|
|
|
896,809 |
|
|
|
3,882,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities
(IBL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
|
1,600,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600,087 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
193,904 |
|
|
|
224,143 |
|
|
|
337,529 |
|
|
|
464,948 |
|
|
|
1,220,524 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
554,202 |
|
|
|
39,079 |
|
|
|
104,484 |
|
|
|
123,490 |
|
|
|
821,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,348,193 |
|
|
|
263,222 |
|
|
|
442,013 |
|
|
|
588,438 |
|
|
|
3,641,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Gap |
|
$ |
(390,290 |
) |
|
$ |
247,707 |
|
|
$ |
74,356 |
|
|
$ |
308,371 |
|
|
$ |
240,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap |
|
$ |
(390,290 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,227 |
) |
|
$ |
240,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEA/IBL (Cumulative) |
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap to IEA |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative twelve-month IEA to IBL ratio changed slightly to 1.07 for June 30, 2009 from
1.08 for December 31, 2008.
The allocation of non-maturity deposits to the one-month maturity category is based on the
estimated sensitivity of each product to changes in market rates. For example, if a products rate
is estimated to increase by 50% as much as the market rates, then 50% of the account balance was
placed in this category. The current allocation is representative of the estimated sensitivities
for a +/- 100 basis point change in market rates.
The measures were calculated using rate shocks, representing immediate rate changes that move
all market rates by the same amount. The variance percentages represent the change between the net
interest income or EVE calculated under the particular rate shock versus the net interest income or
EVE that was calculated assuming market rates as of June 30, 2009.
The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of the Corporations net
interest income and EVE to changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
ALCO |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Guidelines |
Net interest income change (12 months): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
- 100 basis points |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic value of equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
- 100 basis points |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has a relatively neutral interest rate risk position. The Corporation bases its conclusion on its relatively stable net interest margin despite the recent market rate volatility.
During the first six months of 2009, the ALCO utilized several strategies to maintain the
Corporations interest rate risk position at a relatively neutral level. For example, the
Corporation successfully achieved growth in longer-term certificates of deposit. On the lending
side, the Corporation regularly sells long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages to
51
the secondary market and has been successful in the origination of commercial loans with
short-term repricing characteristics. Total variable and adjustable-rate loans increased from
54.6% of total loans as of December 31, 2008 to 55.5% of total loans as of June 30, 2009. The
investment portfolio is used, in part, to improve the Corporations interest rate risk position.
The average life of the investment portfolio is relatively low at 2.6 years versus 2.7 years for
December 31, 2008. Finally, the Corporation has made use of interest rate swaps to lessen its
interest rate risk position. For additional information regarding interest rate swaps, see the
Interest Rate Swaps footnote.
The Corporation recognizes that asset/liability models such as those used by the Corporation
to measure its interest rate risk are based on methodologies that may have inherent shortcomings.
Furthermore, asset/liability models require certain assumptions to be made, such as prepayment
rates on interest earning assets and pricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may differ from
actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon the Corporations experience,
business plans and published industry experience. While management believes such assumptions to be
reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will be achieved.
DEPOSITS AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS
Following is a summary of deposits and treasury management accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
948,925 |
|
|
$ |
919,539 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
3,077,091 |
|
|
|
2,816,628 |
|
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits |
|
|
2,262,677 |
|
|
|
2,318,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
6,288,693 |
|
|
|
6,054,623 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
436,936 |
|
|
|
414,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts |
|
$ |
6,725,629 |
|
|
$ |
6,469,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts increased by $256.3 million or 4.0% to $6.7
billion at June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase in
transaction accounts, which is comprised of non-interest bearing, savings and NOW accounts, which
was partially offset by a decline in certificates of deposit. The increase in transaction accounts
is a result of the Corporations ability to capitalize on competitor disruption in the marketplace,
with ongoing marketing campaigns designed to attract new customers to the Corporations local
approach to banking. Certificates of deposit are down by design reflecting the Corporations
continuing strategy to focus on new customer acquisition.
LOANS
The loan portfolio consists principally of loans to individuals and small- and medium-sized
businesses within the Corporations primary market area of Pennsylvania and northeastern Ohio. The
portfolio also consists of commercial loans in Florida, which totaled $274.5 million or 4.8% of
total loans as of June 30, 2009 compared to $294.2 million or 5.1% of total loans as of December
31, 2009. In addition, the portfolio contains consumer finance loans to individuals in
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee, which totaled $156.8 million or 2.7% of total loans as of June
30, 2009. The Corporation also operates a mortgage loan production office in Tennessee.
Following is a summary of loans, net of unearned income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
3,182,045 |
|
|
$ |
3,173,941 |
|
Direct installment |
|
|
1,005,736 |
|
|
|
1,070,791 |
|
Residential mortgages |
|
|
590,111 |
|
|
|
638,356 |
|
Indirect installment |
|
|
541,168 |
|
|
|
531,430 |
|
Consumer lines of credit |
|
|
373,161 |
|
|
|
340,750 |
|
Other |
|
|
74,888 |
|
|
|
65,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,767,109 |
|
|
$ |
5,820,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
Commercial is comprised of both commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial
loans. Direct installment is comprised of fixed-rate, closed-end consumer loans for personal,
family or household use, such as home equity loans and automobile loans. Residential mortgages
consist of conventional mortgage loans for non-commercial properties. Indirect installment is
comprised of loans written by third parties, primarily automobile loans. Consumer lines of credit
includes home equity lines of credit (HELOC) and consumer lines of credit that are either unsecured
or secured by collateral other than home equity. Other is primarily comprised of commercial
leases, mezzanine loans and student loans.
Unearned income on loans was $34.9 million and $34.0 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
Total loans decreased by $53.3 million or 0.9% to $5.8 billion at June 30, 2009 from December
31, 2008, reflecting a mix of seasonally weaker demand for consumer loans and higher refinancing
activity. Additionally, the commercial loan growth was slower given the economic environment.
The composition of the Corporations commercial loan portfolio in Florida remains consistent
with December 31, 2008 and was comprised of the following as of June 30, 2009: unimproved
residential land (14.9%), unimproved commercial land (26.5%), improved land (4.5%), income
producing commercial real estate (30.7%), residential construction (7.8%), commercial construction
(12.1%), commercial and industrial (2.3%) and owner-occupied (1.2%). The weighted average
loan-to-value ratio for this portfolio is 66.4% as of June 30, 2009.
The majority of the Corporations loan portfolio consists of commercial loans, which is
comprised of both commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans. As of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, commercial real estate loans were $2.0 billion at each date, or 34.6%
and 34.3% of total loans, respectively. Approximately 46.0% of the commercial real estate loans
are owner-occupied, while the remaining 54.0% are non-owner-occupied. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Corporation had construction loans of $186.5 million and $176.7 million,
respectively, representing 3.2% and 3.0% of total loans, respectively.
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and restructured loans. Non-accrual loans
represent loans for which interest accruals have been discontinued. Restructured loans are loans in
which the borrower has been granted a concession on the interest rate or the original repayment
terms due to financial distress. Non-performing assets also include debt securities on which OTTI
has been taken in the current or prior periods.
The Corporation discontinues interest accruals when principal or interest is due and has
remained unpaid for 90 to 180 days depending on the loan type. When a loan is placed on
non-accrual status, all unpaid interest is reversed. Non-accrual loans may not be restored to
accrual status until all delinquent principal and interest has been paid and doubt about the
ultimate collectibility of principal and interest no longer exists.
Non-performing loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the Corporations
loan review and work-out process. The potential risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by
comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of
projected future cash flows. Losses are recognized where appropriate.
53
Following is a summary of non-performing assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
117,013 |
|
|
$ |
139,607 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
122,756 |
|
|
|
143,479 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
18,145 |
|
|
|
9,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and OREO |
|
|
140,901 |
|
|
|
152,656 |
|
Non-performing investments |
|
|
7,768 |
|
|
|
10,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
148,669 |
|
|
$ |
163,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO as a percent of total loans + OREO |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
2.62 |
% |
During the second quarter of 2009, non-performing loans and OREO decreased $22.3 million from
$163.2 million at March 31, 2009 to $140.9 million at June 30, 2009. This decrease in
non-performing loans and OREO occurred due to the Corporations efforts to reduce exposure in its
Florida portfolio. In the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation received payoffs and paydowns on
three non-performing loans totaling $15.2 million. Of the total reduction in non-performing loans
and OREO, Florida accounted for $22.7 million, including charge-offs taken during the quarter.
This 24.0% decrease in Florida related non-performing assets reflects the Corporations strategy to
aggressively reduce this exposure.
Following is a summary of loans 90 days or more past due on which interest accruals continue
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Loans 90 days or more past due |
|
$ |
12,032 |
|
|
$ |
13,677 |
|
As a percentage of total loans |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
Following is a summary of information pertaining to loans considered to be impaired (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Impaired loans with an allocated allowance |
|
$ |
61,406 |
|
|
$ |
78,823 |
|
Impaired loans without an allocated allowance |
|
|
67,826 |
|
|
|
59,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
129,232 |
|
|
$ |
138,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated allowance on impaired loans |
|
$ |
15,448 |
|
|
$ |
20,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of the loans deemed impaired were evaluated using the fair value of the
collateral as the measurement method.
54
The following tables provide additional information relating to non-performing loans for the
Corporations core portfolios (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNBPA (PA) |
|
FNBPA (FL) |
|
Regency |
|
Total |
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
51,113 |
|
|
$ |
65,597 |
|
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
|
$ |
122,756 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
9,106 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
18,145 |
|
Total past due loans |
|
|
55,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
60,764 |
|
Non-performing loans/total loans |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
23.90 |
% |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO/total loans + OREO |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
26.05 |
% |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
45,458 |
|
|
$ |
93,116 |
|
|
$ |
4,905 |
|
|
$ |
143,479 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
7,054 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
9,177 |
|
Total past due loans |
|
|
51,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,613 |
|
|
|
57,071 |
|
Non-performing loans/total loans |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
31.65 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO/total loans + OREO |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
31.91 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
2.62 |
% |
FNBPA (PA) reflects FNBPAs total portfolio excluding the Florida portfolio which is presented
separately.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at a specific point in time. This estimate includes losses
associated with specifically identified loans, as well as estimated probable credit losses inherent
in the remainder of the loan portfolio. Additions are made to the allowance through both periodic
provisions charged to income and recoveries of losses previously incurred. Reductions to the
allowance occur as loans are charged off. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance at
least quarterly, and in doing so relies on various factors including, but not limited to,
assessment of historical loss experience, delinquency and non-accrual trends, portfolio growth,
underlying collateral coverage and current economic conditions. This evaluation is subjective and
requires material estimates that may change over time.
The components of the allowance for loan losses represent estimates based upon FAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and FAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. FAS 5
applies to homogeneous loan pools such as consumer installment, residential mortgages and consumer
lines of credit, as well as commercial loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment
under FAS 114. FAS 114 is applied to commercial loans that are individually evaluated for
impairment.
Under FAS 114, a loan is impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that the loan will not be repaid according to its original contractual terms, including
both principal and interest. Management performs individual assessments of impaired loans to
determine the existence of loss exposure and, where applicable, the extent of loss exposure based
upon the present value of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan, or based upon the
fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs where a loan is collateral dependent.
In estimating loan loss contingencies, management considers numerous factors, including
historical charge-off rates and subsequent recoveries. Management also considers, but is not
limited to, qualitative factors that influence the Corporations credit quality, such as
delinquency and non-performing loan trends, changes in loan underwriting guidelines and credit
policies, as well as the results of internal loan reviews. Finally, management considers the
impact of changes in current local and regional economic conditions in the markets that the
Corporation serves. Assessment of relevant economic factors indicates that the Corporations
primary markets historically tend to lag the national economy, with local economies in the
Corporations primary market areas also improving or weakening, as the case may be, but at a more
measured rate than the national trends. Regional economic factors influencing managements
estimate of reserves include uncertainty of the labor markets in the regions the Corporation serves
and a contracting labor force due, in part, to productivity growth and industry consolidations.
Homogeneous loan pools are evaluated using similar criteria that are based upon historical loss
rates of various loan types. Historical loss rates are adjusted to
55
incorporate changes in existing conditions that may impact, both positively or negatively, the
degree to which these loss histories may vary. This determination inherently involves a high
degree of uncertainty and considers current risk factors that may not have occurred in the
Corporations historical loan loss experience.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation began applying its methodology for
establishing the allowance for loan losses to the Pennsylvania and Florida loan portfolios
separately instead of continuing to evaluate the portfolios on a combined basis. This decision was
based on the fact that the two loan portfolios have different risk characteristics and that the
Florida economic environment was deteriorating at an accelerated rate in the fourth quarter of
2008.
In evaluating its Florida loan portfolio at that time, the Corporation increased the allowance
to address the heightened level of inherent risk in that portfolio given the significant
deterioration in that market. In applying the methodology to this portfolio, the Corporation
utilized quantitative loss factors provided by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
based on a prior recession because no historical data had yet become publicly available for
economic conditions in Florida during 2008 and the impact on lenders like the Corporation. The
combined impact of the significant deterioration in the Florida market and separately evaluating
the Florida loan portfolio utilizing these quantitative factors was a $12.3 million increase in the
Corporations allowance for loan losses for the Florida loan portfolio at December 31, 2008, with
the predominant factor being the impact of the significant deterioration in the Florida market.
The Corporation also increased qualitative allocations to address increased inherent risk
associated with its Florida loans including, but not limited to, current levels and trends of the
Florida portfolio, collateral valuations, charge-offs, non-performing assets, delinquency, risk
rating migration, competition, legal and regulatory issues and local economic trends. The combined
impact of the significant deterioration in the Florida market and separately evaluating the Florida
loan portfolio utilizing these qualitative factors was a $2.3 million increase in the Corporations
allowance for loan losses for the Florida loan portfolio at December 31, 2008.
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
103,127 |
|
|
$ |
53,396 |
|
|
$ |
104,730 |
|
|
$ |
52,806 |
|
Addition from acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,243 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11,243 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(18,381 |
) |
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
(31,239 |
) |
|
|
(9,030 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(17,621 |
) |
|
|
(4,132 |
) |
|
|
(29,753 |
) |
|
|
(7,125 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,909 |
|
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
24,423 |
|
|
|
14,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
99,415 |
|
|
$ |
71,483 |
|
|
$ |
99,415 |
|
|
$ |
71,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
Non-performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.49 |
% |
|
|
117.09 |
% |
The national trends in the economy and real estate market deteriorated during 2008, and the
deterioration accelerated significantly in the fourth quarter of 2008. These trends were
particularly evident in the Florida market where excess inventory built up, new construction slowed
dramatically and credit markets stopped functioning normally. With economic activity turning
negative across all sectors of the economy, sales activity in the Florida real estate market
virtually ceased during the fourth quarter of 2008. The significant deterioration in the Florida
market during the fourth quarter of 2008 also reflected increased stress on borrowers cash flow
streams and increased stress on guarantors characterized by significant reductions in their
liquidity positions.
During the first six months of 2009, activity throughout the Florida marketplace increased
across various asset classes as price points had been reduced to levels that generated interest
from buyers. The Corporation experienced increased activity and levels of interest in condominiums
and developed residential lots. In addition, the Corporation also experienced increased interest
in land as a number of clients pursued sales opportunities for further development.
56
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation was able to reduce its land related
portfolio including OREO by $16.0 million or 10.7%, reducing total land related exposure to $133.0
million. In addition, the condominium portfolio exposure was reduced by $7.4 million or 53.0% to
stand at $6.4 million at June 30, 2009. These reductions are consistent with the Corporations
objective to reduce this exposure in the Florida portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2009 increased $27.9 million from June 30, 2008
representing a 39.1% increase in reserves for loan losses between June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009,
due to higher net charge-offs, additions from acquisitions, additional specific reserves related to
increases in non-accrual loans and increased allocations for a weaker economic environment. The
significant increase primarily reflects deterioration in Florida that accelerated in the fourth
quarter of 2008, and to a much lesser extent, the slowing economy in Pennsylvania. Net charge-offs
increased $22.6 million or 317.6% reflecting higher loan charge-offs due to the weaker economic
environment during the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008. The
total charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2009 included $17.5 million related to three
Florida loans, of which nearly $7.0 million relates to a performing land loan whereby the
Corporation reached an agreement with the borrower to restructure the loan at $16.3 million based
upon the borrowers capacity and commitment to support the project. In doing so, the borrower
posted contractual payments for one year in conjunction with a remargining of the collateral
position supporting the performing status of the loan. Additionally, during the first six months
of 2009, the Corporation provided $14.2 million related to Florida loans to the reserve, bringing
the total allowance for loan losses for the Florida portfolio to $23.3 million or 8.49% of total
loans in that portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans decreased from 117.09%
as of June 30, 2008 to 80.99% as of June 30, 2009. While the allowance for loan losses increased
$27.9 million or 39.1% on a year-over-year basis, non-performing loans increased $61.7 million or
101.1% over the same period. The reduction in the allowance coverage of non-performing loans
relates to the nature of the loans that were added to non-performing status which were supported to
a large extent by real estate collateral at current valuations and therefore did not require a 100%
reserve allocation given the estimated loss exposure on the loans.
The following tables provide additional information relating to the provision and allowance
for loan losses for the Corporations core portfolios (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNBPA (PA) |
|
FNBPA (FL) |
|
Regency |
|
Total |
At or for the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
4,970 |
|
|
$ |
7,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
13,909 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
69,678 |
|
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
6,430 |
|
|
|
99,415 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
11,206 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
17,621 |
|
Net loan charge-offs (annualized)/average loans |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
15.60 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/total loans |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
1.72 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/non-performing loans |
|
|
136.32 |
% |
|
|
35.53 |
% |
|
|
106.35 |
% |
|
|
80.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months
Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
17,532 |
|
|
$ |
32,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
51,298 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
69,745 |
|
|
|
28,506 |
|
|
|
6,479 |
|
|
|
104,730 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
13,745 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
21,148 |
|
Net loan charge-offs (annualized)/average loans |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
18.59 |
% |
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/total loans |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
9.69 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/non-performing loans |
|
|
153.43 |
% |
|
|
30.61 |
% |
|
|
132.09 |
% |
|
|
72.99 |
% |
At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had $10.8 million and $11.0 million of loans,
respectively, that were impaired loans acquired and have no associated allowance for loan losses as
they were accounted for in accordance with SOP 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt
Securities Acquired in a Transfer.
57
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality,
liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The
Corporation seeks to maintain a strong capital base to support its growth and expansion activities,
to provide stability to current operations and to promote public confidence.
The Corporation has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Pursuant to this registration statement, the Corporation may, from time to
time, issue and sell in one or more offerings any combination of common stock, preferred stock,
debt securities or trust preferred securities. As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation has issued
24,150,000 common shares in a public equity offering.
The Corporation and FNBPA are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the federal banking agencies. Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital
adequacy require the Corporation and FNBPA to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier
1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of leverage
ratio (as defined). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory,
and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and
FNBPA must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Corporations and FNBPAs capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
The Corporations management believes that, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Corporation and FNBPA met all capital adequacy requirements to which either of them was subject.
As of June 30, 2009, the most recent notification from the federal banking agencies
categorized the Corporation and FNBPA as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. There are no conditions or events since the notification which management
believes have changed this categorization.
Following are the capital ratios as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for the Corporation
and FNBPA (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Requirements |
|
Requirements |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
899,919 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
$ |
610,226 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
488,180 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
682,772 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
595,905 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
476,724 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
813,374 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
366,135 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
244,090 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
608,045 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
357,543 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
238,362 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
813,374 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
402,200 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
321,760 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
608,045 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
393,819 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
315,055 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Requirements |
|
Requirements |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
662,600 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
$ |
595,569 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
476,455 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
624,976 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
583,070 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
466,456 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
577,317 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
357,342 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
238,228 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
551,931 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
349,842 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
233,228 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
577,317 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
393,141 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
314,513 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
551,931 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
385,201 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
308,161 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The information called for by this item is provided under the caption Market Risk in Item 2 -
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There are
no material changes in the information provided under Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk included in the Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
with the SEC on March 2, 2009.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The Corporations management, with the
participation of the Corporations principal executive and financial officers, evaluated the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the Corporations management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of such date at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Corporations management, including its principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS. The Corporations management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Corporations
disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. In addition, controls can be circumvented
by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management
override of the controls.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
have evaluated the changes to the Corporations internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred during the Corporations fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as required by paragraph (d)
of Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have
concluded that there were no such changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal controls over financial reporting.
59
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation or a
subsidiary acted as one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter,
fiduciary, financial advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the
ultimate outcome for any asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation
believes that it and its subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are
established for legal claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period.
There are no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Corporations
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009 and in the Corporations Prospectus
Supplement filed with the SEC on June 10, 2009.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
NONE
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
NONE
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of F.N.B. Corporation was held on May 20, 2009. Proxies
were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and there was no solicitation in opposition to the Corporations solicitation.
The ratification of Ernst & Young as the Corporations independent registered public
accounting firm for 2009 was approved with 71,373,975 shares voted for, 1,233,460 shares
voted against and 211,756 abstentions.
The approval of the Corporations overall executive compensation policy and procedures was
approved with 53,336,303 shares voted for, 17,570,004 shares voted against and 1,912,884
abstentions.
The five director nominees proposed by the Board of Directors were elected with the
following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
|
For |
|
Withhold |
Former Class II
Directors (terms expiring
at the 2009
Annual Meeting) |
Phillip E. Gingerich |
|
|
69,779,612 |
|
|
|
3,039,579 |
|
Robert B. Goldstein |
|
|
69,360,994 |
|
|
|
3,458,197 |
|
David J. Malone |
|
|
69,235,381 |
|
|
|
3,583,810 |
|
Arthur J. Rooney, II |
|
|
54,594,190 |
|
|
|
18,225,001 |
|
William J. Strimbu |
|
|
69,812,126 |
|
|
|
3,007,065 |
|
60
Directors whose term of office as a director continued after the meeting date were as follows:
Former Class III Directors (terms expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting)
Stephen J. Gurgovits
William B. Campbell
Harry F. Radcliffe
John W. Rose
Stanton R. Sheetz
Former Class I Directors (term expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting)
D. Stephen Martz
Henry M. Ekker
Dawne S. Hickton
Peter Mortensen
Earl K. Wahl, Jr.
Effective December 17, 2008, the Corporations Board of Directors voted to amend and restate
the Corporations Bylaws to declassify its Board of Directors. Under the amendment, each
director in office as of December 17, 2008 will continue to serve until the expiration of
the term of office to which the director was most recently elected or appointed or the
directors earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal. After
December 31, 2008, each director who is elected at any meeting of shareholders or appointed
to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors shall serve a one year term until the next
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
NONE
|
|
|
11
|
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings * |
|
|
|
15
|
|
Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1.
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2.
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1.
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2.
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
This information is provided under the heading Earnings Per Share in Item 1, Part I, in
this Report on Form 10-Q. |
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 10, 2009
|
|
/s/Stephen J. Gurgovits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen J. Gurgovits |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 10, 2009
|
|
/s/Vincent J. Calabrese |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent J. Calabrese |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
62