e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 000-13818
POPULAR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0667416 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
Popular Center Building |
|
|
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey |
|
|
San Juan, Puerto Rico
|
|
00918 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(787) 765-9800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value 282,031,548 shares outstanding as of
August 5, 2009.
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to the Corporations financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives,
future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes,
capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and
new accounting standards on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations. All
statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the
words anticipate, believe, continues, expect, estimate, intend, project and similar
expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might,
can, may, or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of
which are beyond the Corporations control, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of declining growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general
business and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this
Form 10Q for a discussion of such
factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to
the Corporation as of the date of this document, and than as required by law, including the
requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
661,852 |
|
|
$ |
784,987 |
|
|
$ |
887,619 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
106,092 |
|
|
|
214,990 |
|
|
|
710,000 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
306,974 |
|
|
|
304,228 |
|
|
|
170,497 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
538,581 |
|
|
|
275,436 |
|
|
|
17,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
951,647 |
|
|
|
794,654 |
|
|
|
897,796 |
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,599,558 |
|
|
|
3,031,137 |
|
|
|
3,418,708 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
4,646,901 |
|
|
|
4,893,350 |
|
|
|
4,283,619 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value as of June
30, 2009 $313,462; December 31, 2008 $290,134; June 30, 2008 $231,210) |
|
|
320,061 |
|
|
|
294,747 |
|
|
|
232,483 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable
value as of June 30, 2009 $216,551; December 31, 2008 $255,830; June 30, 2008
- $299,827) |
|
|
214,923 |
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
|
|
240,731 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
400,128 |
|
|
|
562,795 |
|
|
|
417,437 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
87,054 |
|
|
|
83,108 |
|
|
|
82,051 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
242,847 |
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
337,552 |
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,758 |
|
Other loans measured at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799,134 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
24,717,321 |
|
|
|
25,857,237 |
|
|
|
26,636,004 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
111,259 |
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
|
|
186,770 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,146,239 |
|
|
|
882,807 |
|
|
|
652,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,459,823 |
|
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
|
25,796,504 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
614,366 |
|
|
|
620,807 |
|
|
|
633,450 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
105,553 |
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
|
|
102,809 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
135,978 |
|
|
|
156,227 |
|
|
|
163,274 |
|
Servicing assets (at fair value on June 30, 2009 $180,808; December 31, 2008 -
$176,034; June 30, 2008 $186,155) |
|
|
184,189 |
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
|
|
190,778 |
|
Other assets (See Note 9) |
|
|
1,214,849 |
|
|
|
1,115,597 |
|
|
|
2,455,842 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
607,164 |
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
|
|
628,826 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
48,447 |
|
|
|
53,163 |
|
|
|
64,223 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations (See Note 3) |
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,498,792 |
|
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
$ |
41,678,594 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
4,408,865 |
|
|
$ |
4,293,553 |
|
|
$ |
4,482,287 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
22,504,620 |
|
|
|
23,256,652 |
|
|
|
22,633,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,913,485 |
|
|
|
27,550,205 |
|
|
|
27,115,728 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,941,678 |
|
|
|
3,551,608 |
|
|
|
4,738,677 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
1,337,210 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
2,643,722 |
|
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
|
|
3,750,647 |
|
Notes payable at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,725 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,084,455 |
|
|
|
1,096,338 |
|
|
|
856,613 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations (See Note 3) |
|
|
13,926 |
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,599,091 |
|
|
|
35,614,405 |
|
|
|
37,972,600 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 24,410,000 issued and outstanding
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (June 30, 2008 23,475,000)
(aggregate liquidation preference value of $1,521,875 as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008; $586,875 as of June 30, 2008) |
|
|
1,487,000 |
|
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value as of June 30, 2009 ($6.00 as of December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2008); 700,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2009
(470,000,000 as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008); 282,034,819
shares issued
(December 31, 2008 295,632,080; June 30, 2008 294,620,193) and 282,031,548
outstanding (December 31, 2008 282,004,713; June 30, 2008 280,983,132) |
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
1,767,721 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,185,757 |
|
|
|
621,879 |
|
|
|
563,100 |
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
|
|
(659,165 |
) |
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
|
|
1,086,373 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of ($67,257)
(December 31, 2008 ($24,771); June 30, 2008 ($22,392)) |
|
|
(116,700 |
) |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(90,448 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 3,271 shares as of June 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008
13,627,367 shares; June 30, 2008 13,637,061 shares) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
(207,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2,899,701 |
|
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
3,705,994 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,498,792 |
|
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
$ |
41,678,594 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
382,244 |
|
|
$ |
466,576 |
|
|
$ |
784,012 |
|
|
$ |
964,032 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
10,204 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
75,818 |
|
|
|
82,755 |
|
|
|
149,301 |
|
|
|
176,859 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
12,451 |
|
|
|
21,411 |
|
|
|
26,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
471,046 |
|
|
|
565,258 |
|
|
|
960,238 |
|
|
|
1,117,100 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
128,452 |
|
|
|
168,045 |
|
|
|
276,491 |
|
|
|
362,985 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
16,631 |
|
|
|
40,312 |
|
|
|
37,334 |
|
|
|
100,591 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
42,903 |
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
90,867 |
|
|
|
47,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
187,986 |
|
|
|
234,961 |
|
|
|
404,692 |
|
|
|
511,044 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
283,060 |
|
|
|
330,297 |
|
|
|
555,546 |
|
|
|
666,056 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
350,401 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(66,384 |
) |
|
|
141,132 |
|
|
|
(166,427 |
) |
|
|
315,655 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
53,463 |
|
|
|
51,799 |
|
|
|
107,204 |
|
|
|
102,886 |
|
Other service fees (See Note 18) |
|
|
102,437 |
|
|
|
108,117 |
|
|
|
200,970 |
|
|
|
211,347 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
53,705 |
|
|
|
28,334 |
|
|
|
229,851 |
|
|
|
78,562 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
16,839 |
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
|
|
23,662 |
|
|
|
31,878 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
(13,453 |
) |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
(27,266 |
) |
|
|
19,174 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
26,149 |
|
|
|
56,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
159,455 |
|
|
|
376,930 |
|
|
|
394,143 |
|
|
|
816,204 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
107,079 |
|
|
|
120,598 |
|
|
|
212,402 |
|
|
|
242,015 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
29,127 |
|
|
|
34,719 |
|
|
|
69,095 |
|
|
|
69,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
136,206 |
|
|
|
155,317 |
|
|
|
281,497 |
|
|
|
311,285 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
26,840 |
|
|
|
52,465 |
|
|
|
54,708 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
25,202 |
|
|
|
28,854 |
|
|
|
51,306 |
|
|
|
58,007 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,084 |
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
|
|
26,260 |
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
51,949 |
|
|
|
57,184 |
|
Communications |
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
24,213 |
|
|
|
25,563 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
17,856 |
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
7,494 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
36,331 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
38,968 |
|
|
|
39,168 |
|
|
|
73,202 |
|
|
|
68,346 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
330,645 |
|
|
|
330,338 |
|
|
|
634,842 |
|
|
|
653,633 |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(171,190 |
) |
|
|
46,592 |
|
|
|
(240,699 |
) |
|
|
162,571 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
(12,581 |
) |
|
|
(21,540 |
) |
|
|
4,159 |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(176,583 |
) |
|
|
59,173 |
|
|
|
(219,159 |
) |
|
|
158,412 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(183,182 |
) |
|
$ |
24,250 |
|
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
|
$ |
(207,810 |
) |
|
$ |
18,247 |
|
|
$ |
(285,010 |
) |
|
$ |
118,559 |
|
|
(LOSSES) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
Losses from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (losses) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
5
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,483,525 |
|
|
$ |
186,875 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount 2008 Series C |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
1,487,000 |
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
1,761,908 |
|
Common stock issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,813 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(81,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in par value (from $6.00 to $0.01) |
|
|
(1,689,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
1,767,721 |
|
|
Surplus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
621,879 |
|
|
|
568,184 |
|
Common stock issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
Issuance cost of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,950 |
) |
Stock options expense on unexercised options, net of forfeitures |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(125,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in par value (from $6.00 to $0.01) |
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,185,757 |
|
|
|
563,100 |
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
|
|
1,319,467 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(235,704 |
) |
|
|
127,540 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change adoption of SFAS No.
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261,831 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
|
|
(89,822 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
(8,981 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount 2008 Series C |
|
|
(3,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(659,165 |
) |
|
|
1,086,373 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(46,812 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(87,871 |
) |
|
|
(43,636 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(116,700 |
) |
|
|
(90,448 |
) |
|
Treasury stock at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
(207,740 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
Reissuance of common stock |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(207,627 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,899,701 |
|
|
$ |
3,705,994 |
|
|
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
Shared issued (2008 Series B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
Shared issued (2008 Series C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
935,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
23,475,000 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
293,651,398 |
|
|
|
293,651,398 |
|
Issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,682 |
|
|
|
968,795 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
282,034,819 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
294,620,193 |
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
(13,627,367 |
) |
|
|
(13,637,061 |
) |
|
Common Stock outstanding |
|
|
282,031,548 |
|
|
|
282,004,713 |
|
|
|
280,983,132 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(183,182 |
) |
|
$ |
24,250 |
|
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(1,192 |
) |
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
63,095 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
Unrealized holding losses on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(34,712 |
) |
|
|
(149,927 |
) |
|
|
(19,399 |
) |
|
|
(22,437 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net (loss) income |
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
(27,685 |
) |
|
|
(177,556 |
) |
|
|
(26,373 |
) |
Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
(1,623 |
) |
|
|
(2,107 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net (loss) income |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
(31,712 |
) |
|
|
(176,005 |
) |
|
|
(130,357 |
) |
|
|
(50,590 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
41,838 |
|
|
|
42,486 |
|
|
|
6,954 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(26,018 |
) |
|
|
(134,167 |
) |
|
|
(87,871 |
) |
|
|
(43,636 |
) |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
$ |
(209,200 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(323,575 |
) |
|
$ |
83,904 |
|
|
Tax Effects Allocated to Each Component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(22,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
$ |
6,050 |
|
|
$ |
38,943 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net (loss) income |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
62,709 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flows hedges |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net (loss) income |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
$ |
5,694 |
|
|
$ |
41,838 |
|
|
$ |
42,486 |
|
|
$ |
6,954 |
|
|
Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(39,825 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,068 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,780 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(197,114 |
) |
|
|
(260,209 |
) |
|
|
(51,213 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
76,858 |
|
|
|
99,641 |
|
|
|
20,108 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(120,256 |
) |
|
|
(160,568 |
) |
|
|
(31,105 |
) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
53,019 |
|
|
|
249,974 |
|
|
|
(21,718 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(9,616 |
) |
|
|
(75,618 |
) |
|
|
854 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
43,403 |
|
|
|
174,356 |
|
|
|
(20,864 |
) |
|
Unrealized losses on cash flows hedges |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(4,297 |
) |
|
|
(4,129 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(3,549 |
) |
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
$ |
(116,700 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,448 |
) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
33,603 |
|
|
|
37,318 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
358,862 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustments of servicing assets |
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
25,122 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(229,851 |
) |
|
|
(75,703 |
) |
(Gains) losses from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair
value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
38,942 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
(3,111 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
32,472 |
|
|
|
(67,292 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan origination fees and costs |
|
|
22,831 |
|
|
|
28,951 |
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(6,380 |
) |
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(73,983 |
) |
|
|
(83,836 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(685,500 |
) |
|
|
(1,509,819 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(209,814 |
) |
|
|
(185,053 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
43,875 |
|
|
|
1,006,208 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
911,066 |
|
|
|
732,067 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
19,553 |
|
|
|
42,301 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
36,984 |
|
|
|
(264,170 |
) |
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(30,133 |
) |
|
|
(53,440 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
61,055 |
|
|
|
(24,429 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
673,662 |
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
437,958 |
|
|
|
141,959 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments |
|
|
(156,993 |
) |
|
|
108,916 |
|
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(3,962,978 |
) |
|
|
(3,427,660 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(28,328 |
) |
|
|
(3,631,141 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(22,243 |
) |
|
|
(136,775 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
846,944 |
|
|
|
1,851,899 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
3,884,838 |
|
Other |
|
|
24,988 |
|
|
|
112,628 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,747,567 |
|
|
|
2,406,504 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
44,425 |
|
|
|
49,330 |
|
Net repayments (disbursements) on loans |
|
|
670,771 |
|
|
|
(596,548 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
304,468 |
|
|
|
1,715,330 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(18,260 |
) |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(37,741 |
) |
|
|
(98,028 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
76,334 |
|
|
|
51,684 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
1,500,160 |
|
|
|
2,301,065 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(633,722 |
) |
|
|
(1,198,512 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(609,930 |
) |
|
|
(698,588 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
|
|
(164,769 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(804,072 |
) |
|
|
(1,243,674 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
61,031 |
|
|
|
630,186 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
|
|
(98,685 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,120 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,050 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,061,253 |
) |
|
|
(2,374,230 |
) |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(123,135 |
) |
|
|
68,794 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
|
818,825 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
661,852 |
|
|
$ |
887,619 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Note: The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with
discontinued operations.
8
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
Note 5 Pledged Assets
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
Note 8 Mortgage Servicing Rights
Note 9 Other Assets
Note 10 Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Note 11 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Note 12 Fair Value Measurement
Note 13 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 14 Borrowings
Note 15 Trust Preferred Securities
Note 16 Stockholders Equity
Note 17 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Note 18 Other Service Fees
Note 19 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Note 20 Restructuring Plans
Note 21 Income Taxes
Note 22 Stock-Based Compensation
Note 23 (Loss) Earnings per Common Share
Note 24 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Note 25 Segment Reporting
Note 26 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities
Note 27 Exchange Offer
9
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin
America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation offers retail and commercial banking services through its
principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and equipment
leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services
through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular
North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank
providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA
operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit
accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA and offers loan customers the option of being
referred to a trusted consumer lending partner for loan products. The Corporation, through its
subsidiary EVERTEC, provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin
America, as well as internally servicing many of its subsidiaries system infrastructures and
transactional processing businesses. Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements presents
further information about the Corporations business segments.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair
statement of the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a
normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results. Certain reclassifications have been
made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2009 presentation,
including retrospectively adjusting certain information of the consolidated statement of
operations to present in a separate line item the results of discontinued operations from prior
periods presented.
The statement of condition data as of December 31, 2008 was derived from audited financial
statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted from the statements presented as of June 30, 2009, December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008,
included in the Corporations 2008 Annual Report. The Corporations Form 10-K filed on March 2,
2009 incorporates by reference the 2008 Annual Report.
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards
SFAS No. 141-R Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business Combinations (a
revision of SFAS No. 141) (SFAS No. 141(R))
SFAS No. 141(R), issued in December 2007, establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. The Corporation is required to apply
SFAS No. 141(R) to all business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. For business
combinations in which the acquisition date was before the effective date, the provisions of SFAS
No. 141(R) will apply to the subsequent accounting for deferred income tax valuation allowances and
income tax contingencies and will require any changes in those amounts to be recorded in earnings.
SFAS No. 141(R) has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the
Corporation as of June 30, 2009.
10
SFAS No. 160 Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, which amends ARB No. 51, to establish accounting
and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 requires entities to classify noncontrolling interests as a component
of stockholders equity on the consolidated financial statements and requires subsequent changes in
ownership interests in a subsidiary to be accounted for as an equity transaction. Additionally,
SFAS No. 160 requires entities to recognize a gain or loss upon the loss of control of a subsidiary
and to remeasure any ownership interest retained at fair value on that date. This statement also
requires expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 was adopted by the Corporation
on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, an amendment of SFAS No. 133. The standard requires
enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133 and related interpretations. The standard expands the disclosure requirements for
derivatives and hedged items and has no impact on how the Corporation accounts for these
instruments. The standard was adopted by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2009. Refer to
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165)
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS. No. 165, which establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this standard sets forth the period after
the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective
for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. The Corporation evaluated subsequent events through August 10, 2009. Refer to Note
27 for related disclosures.
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No.
140 (SFAS No. 166)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, a revision of SFAS No. 140, which requires more
information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where
entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPEs), changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. It also requires a
transferor to evaluate all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated in
accordance with SFAS No. 167 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement must be
applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Corporation
is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption to its consolidated financial
statements; however, it is not expected that it will have a material impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167)
SFAS No. 167, issued in June 2009, amends the consolidating guidance applicable to variable
interest entities and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another
entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting
entitys ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the
other entitys economic performance. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all
entities currently within the scope of FIN 46(R), as well as qualifying special-purpose entities
(QSPEs) that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN 46(R). SFAS No. 167 will require a
reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity
will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the
reporting entitys financial statements. SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of the
first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
11
2009. The Corporation is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption to its
consolidated financial statements; however, it is not expected that it will have a material impact
on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168)
The FASB has issued SFAS No. 168 in June 2009. This statement establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 and the Codification are
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become non-authoritative. The Corporation will begin to use the new guidelines
and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of
2009. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any
impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Staff Position FAS 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase
Financing Transactions(FSP FAS 140-3)
FSP FAS 140-3, issued by the FASB in February 2008, provides implementation guidance on whether the
security transfer and contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial
asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions. FSP FAS
140-3 requires the recognition of the transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked
transaction, unless all of the following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the
repurchase financing are not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor
has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreements price is fixed and not at fair
value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and
repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing
is before the maturity of the financial asset. The scope of this FSP is limited to transfers and
subsequent repurchase financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one
another. The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 140-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-3
did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for 2009.
FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets(FSP FAS
142-3)
FSP FAS 142-3, issued by the FASB in April 2008, amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In developing
these assumptions, an entity should consider its own historical experience in renewing or extending
similar arrangements adjusted for entity specific factors or, in the absence of that experience,
the assumptions that market participants would use about renewals or extensions adjusted for the
entity specific factors. FSP FAS 142-3 shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material
impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for the quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2009.
EITF 08-6 Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations(EITF 08-6)
EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving
equity method investments. This EITF applies to all investments accounted for under the equity
method. EITF 08-6 provides guidance on the following: (1) how the initial carrying value of an
equity method investment should be determined; (2) how an impairment assessment of an underlying
indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed; (3) how an
equity method investees issuance of shares should be accounted for, and (4) how to account for a
change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. The adoption of EITF 08-6 in
January 2009 did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
12
FASB Staff Position FSP FAS 132(R)-1 Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets(FSP FAS 132(R)-1)
FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures in the financial statements of employers who are
subject to the disclosure requirements of FAS 132(R) as follows: (a) the investment allocation
decision making process, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment
policies and strategies; (b) the fair value of each major category of plan assets, disclosed
separately for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; (c) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, including the level within the fair value
hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; and (d) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additional detailed information is required for each
category above. Upon initial application, the provisions of this FSP are not required for earlier
periods that are presented for comparative periods. The Corporation will apply the new disclosure
requirements commencing with the December 31, 2009 annual financial statements. This FSP impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations.
FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments(FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, which is intended to provide greater
clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment
event. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt
securities. The new guidance improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairment on investment securities and changes the calculation of the other-than-temporary
impairment recognized in earnings in the financial statements. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 does not
amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of
equity securities.
For debt securities, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 requires an entity to assess whether (a) it has
the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to
sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an
other-than-temporary impairment on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined by FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and
the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is
not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the
anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any
current-period credit loss), FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 change the presentation and amount of the
other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the statement of operations. In these instances, the
impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and
(b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of
operations. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive loss. Previously, in all cases, if an impairment was determined to be
other-than-temporary, an impairment loss was recognized in earnings in an amount equal to the
entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance
sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment was made.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective and is to be applied prospectively for financial
statements issued for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. When
adopting FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, an entity is required to record a cumulative-effect
adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a
previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other
comprehensive loss if the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely
than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of
its amortized cost basis.
The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 for interim and annual reporting periods
commencing with the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 in the
second quarter of 2009 did not have a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the
period of adoption (April 1, 2009) since there were no previously recognized other-than-temporary
impairments related to outstanding debt securities. Also, the FSP did not have an impact on the
Corporations results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 since the
13
unrealized losses in the Corporations investment securities available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity were considered temporary based on managements assessments. Refer to Notes 6 and
7 for additional disclosures.
FASB Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments(FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 to require providing disclosures on a
quarterly basis about the fair value of financial instruments that are not currently reflected on
the statement of condition at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair value for these assets
and liabilities was only required for year-end disclosures. The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1 effective with the financial statement disclosures for the quarter ended June 30,
2009. This FSP only impacts disclosure requirements and therefore did not have an impact on the
Corporations financial condition or results of operations. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated
financial statements for required disclosures.
FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not
Orderly(FSP FAS 157-4)
FSP FAS 157-4, issued in April 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on
identifying circumstances that indicate that a transaction is not orderly. It reaffirms the need to
use judgment to ascertain if an active market has become inactive and in determining fair values
when markets have become inactive. Additionally, it also emphasizes that even if there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless
of the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair
value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market
participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 shall be
applied prospectively and retrospective application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4
did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular
Financial Holdings in 2008 by selling substantially all assets and closing service branches and
other units.
For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations of PFH are presented
as Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and as Loss
from discontinued operations, net of income tax in
the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. Prior periods presented in the
consolidated statement of operations, as well as note disclosures covering income and expense
amounts included in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements, were
retrospectively adjusted for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of condition and
related amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 do not
reflect the reclassification of PFHs assets / liabilities to discontinued operations.
Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations amounted to $3 million as of June 30, 2009,
compared to $13 million as of December 31, 2008. PFHs total assets amounted to $2.0 billion as of
June 30, 2008, principally consisting of $1.2 billion in loans, of which $0.8 billion were
accounted at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159, and $354 million in deferred tax assets, $300
million in servicing advances and related assets, and $56 million in mortgage servicing rights. As
disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation substantially sold these loan portfolios and
servicing related assets in late 2008. As of June 30, 2008, all loans and borrowings recognized at
fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 pertained to the discontinued operations of PFH.
Assets held by the PFH discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 included $1 million in loans
measured at fair value with an unpaid principal balance of $10 million. Liabilities from
discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 amounted to approximately $14 million, which primarily
consisted of indemnity and representation and warranty reserves associated to loans sold to
third-parties under certain sales agreements.
14
The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
($ in millions) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Non-interest (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of tax |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.9 |
) |
|
Management implemented a series of actions in 2008 to downsize and eventually discontinue the
PFH operations. These actions included two major restructuring plans, which are described in the
2008 Annual Report. These are the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan and the PFH Branch
Network Restructuring Plan. The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan commenced execution in the
second half of 2008 and included the elimination of substantially all employment positions and
termination of contracts with the objective of discontinuing PFHs operations. The PFH Branch
Network Restructuring Plan resulted in the sale of a substantial portion of PFHs loan portfolio in
the first quarter of 2008 and the closure of Equity Ones consumer service branches, which
represented, at the time, the only significant channel for PFH to continue originating loans. The
PFH Branch Network Restructuring Plan was completed.
The following section provides information on the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring. This plan is
substantially complete as the company transferred the servicing of the loan portfolios of its
affiliated company, E-LOAN, to a third-party in June 2009. PFH continues to employ 69
full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that are
primarily retained for a transition period. Additional costs could be incurred during 2009
associated to lease terminations, but these are not expected to be significant to the Corporations
results of operations.
PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
resulted in charges, on a pre-tax basis, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
86 |
(a) |
|
$ |
981 |
(a) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined
charges for 2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
8,040 |
|
Quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,105 |
|
|
$ |
9,021 |
|
|
The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan charges are included in the line item Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations for 2009 and
2008.
15
The following table presents the activity in the accrued balances for the PFH Discontinuance Plan
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
895 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
86 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
|
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required
average reserve balances were $718 million as of June 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $684 million;
June 30, 2008 $665 million). Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term, highly-liquid
securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
In compliance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Corporation
may be required to establish a special reserve account for the benefit of brokerage customers of
its broker-dealer subsidiary, which may consist of securities segregated in the special reserve
account. There were no reserve requirements as of June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2008 the Corporation had securities with a market value of $0.3 million. These securities were
classified in the consolidated statement of condition within the other trading securities category.
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Regulatory Act, as of June 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2008, the Corporation maintained separately for its two
international banking entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally divided for the two
IBEs, which were considered restricted assets.
As part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, as of June 30, 2009, December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million as collateral
for the line of credit. The cash is being held in certificates of deposits which mature in less
than 90 days. The line of credit is used to support letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $3 million to support a letter
of credit. The cash is being held in an interest-bearing money market account.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had restricted cash of $2 million (December 31, 2008 $3
million; June 30, 2008 $3.5 million) to support a letter of credit related to a service
settlement agreement.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation had $10 million in cash equivalents
restricted as to usage for the potential payment of obligations contained in a loan sales agreement
until November 3, 2009.
16
Note 5 Pledged Assets
Certain securities and loans were pledged principally to secure public and trust deposits, assets
sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative
positions and loan servicing agreements. The classification and carrying amount of the
Corporations pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge
the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
2,252,017 |
|
|
$ |
2,470,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,716,718 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
125,770 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
34,014 |
|
|
|
35,764 |
|
|
|
36,613 |
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,646 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
7,629,613 |
|
|
|
8,101,999 |
|
|
|
7,727,951 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,041,414 |
|
|
$ |
10,708,354 |
|
|
$ |
10,648,928 |
|
|
Pledged securities and loans in which the creditor has the right by custom or contract to
repledge are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
17
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and approximate market value (or fair value
for certain investment securities where no market quotations are available) of investment
securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,833 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
154,896 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,886 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,476,345 |
|
|
|
65,241 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
|
1,541,412 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,811 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,871 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,880 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,459 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,685,932 |
|
|
|
69,870 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
1,755,628 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
68,476 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
63,834 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
28,690 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
28,417 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
103,816 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
5,191 |
|
|
|
98,908 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
148,888 |
|
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
150,617 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,508,619 |
|
|
|
17,049 |
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
1,514,030 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,666,339 |
|
|
|
19,433 |
|
|
|
12,127 |
|
|
|
1,673,645 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
26,478 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
128,354 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18,567 |
|
|
|
109,790 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
155,799 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
19,314 |
|
|
|
136,488 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
78,841 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
80,342 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
149,901 |
|
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
154,709 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
3,304,858 |
|
|
|
17,212 |
|
|
|
19,559 |
|
|
|
3,302,511 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,538,743 |
|
|
|
23,578 |
|
|
|
19,564 |
|
|
|
3,542,757 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,116 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,193,440 |
|
|
$ |
114,386 |
|
|
$ |
61,367 |
|
|
$ |
7,246,459 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
456,551 |
|
|
$ |
45,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502,118 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
123,315 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,170 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,361,775 |
|
|
|
262,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,623,959 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,811 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,908 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,877 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,971 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,539,778 |
|
|
|
267,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807,008 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
67,975 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
64,938 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
29,423 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
29,229 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
104,157 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
100,990 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
6,837 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,877 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
156,240 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
156,030 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,363,705 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
28,913 |
|
|
|
1,343,882 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,526,961 |
|
|
|
9,926 |
|
|
|
29,919 |
|
|
|
1,506,968 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
30,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
28,005 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
158,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,364 |
|
|
|
120,303 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
190,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,276 |
|
|
|
148,748 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
18,673 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
18,711 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
67,657 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
116,059 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
119,289 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
635,159 |
|
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
642,848 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
837,461 |
|
|
|
14,866 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
848,505 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,674,513 |
|
|
$ |
337,998 |
|
|
$ |
88,024 |
|
|
$ |
7,924,487 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
461,404 |
|
|
$ |
542 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
460,751 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
188,498 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
188,922 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,367,914 |
|
|
|
26,771 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
4,383,913 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,608 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,874 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,307 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,588,854 |
|
|
|
27,677 |
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
4,605,750 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,676 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
6,874 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
25,959 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
25,943 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
81,292 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
79,581 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
126,775 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
125,182 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
138,134 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
137,540 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,263,250 |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
11,093 |
|
|
|
1,255,165 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,407,530 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
1,398,867 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
19,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
18,609 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
198,433 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
190,474 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
218,672 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
8,966 |
|
|
|
209,743 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,590 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
96,007 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
96,215 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
70,357 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
69,398 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
716,660 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
9,918 |
|
|
|
711,835 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
889,613 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
884,038 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
28,607 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
13,642 |
|
|
|
15,406 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
20.47 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,724,045 |
|
|
$ |
38,133 |
|
|
$ |
59,851 |
|
|
$ |
7,702,327 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
20
The following tables shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and market
value of investment
securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30 2009, December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
60,461 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
60,287 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
28,751 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
289,441 |
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
|
|
284,948 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
20,302 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
19,433 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,632,638 |
|
|
|
19,151 |
|
|
|
1,613,487 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
10,739 |
|
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,042,332 |
|
|
$ |
29,710 |
|
|
$ |
2,012,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
57,547 |
|
|
$ |
4,938 |
|
|
$ |
52,609 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
491,393 |
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
483,759 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
135,119 |
|
|
|
18,445 |
|
|
|
116,674 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
46,397 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
45,984 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
732,779 |
|
|
$ |
31,657 |
|
|
$ |
701,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
60,461 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
60,287 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
86,298 |
|
|
|
5,191 |
|
|
|
81,107 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
780,834 |
|
|
|
12,127 |
|
|
|
768,707 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
155,421 |
|
|
|
19,314 |
|
|
|
136,107 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,679,035 |
|
|
|
19,564 |
|
|
|
1,659,471 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,062 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,775,111 |
|
|
$ |
61,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,713,744 |
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
34,795 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
34,492 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
485,140 |
|
|
|
13,274 |
|
|
|
471,866 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
59,643 |
|
|
|
15,315 |
|
|
|
44,328 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
109,298 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
108,622 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
|
9,480 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
708,417 |
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
669,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
44,011 |
|
|
$ |
3,212 |
|
|
$ |
40,799 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
423,137 |
|
|
|
16,645 |
|
|
|
406,492 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
130,065 |
|
|
|
25,961 |
|
|
|
104,104 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
206,472 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
203,326 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
803,714 |
|
|
$ |
48,976 |
|
|
$ |
754,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
78,806 |
|
|
$ |
3,515 |
|
|
$ |
75,291 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
908,277 |
|
|
|
29,919 |
|
|
|
878,358 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
189,708 |
|
|
|
41,276 |
|
|
|
148,432 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
315,770 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
311,948 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,570 |
|
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,512,131 |
|
|
$ |
88,024 |
|
|
$ |
1,424,107 |
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
277,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
276,450 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
2,104,165 |
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
2,093,384 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
31,745 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
31,633 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
793,703 |
|
|
|
7,759 |
|
|
|
785,944 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
129,922 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
127,055 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
277,464 |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
274,076 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
27,268 |
|
|
|
13,634 |
|
|
|
13,634 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,641,912 |
|
|
$ |
39,736 |
|
|
$ |
3,602,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
49,012 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
$ |
47,288 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
130,919 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
126,565 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
87,737 |
|
|
|
6,099 |
|
|
|
81,638 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
276,775 |
|
|
|
7,930 |
|
|
|
268,845 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
544,472 |
|
|
$ |
20,115 |
|
|
$ |
524,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
277,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
276,450 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
2,104,165 |
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
2,093,384 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
80,757 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
78,921 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
924,622 |
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
912,509 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
217,659 |
|
|
|
8,966 |
|
|
|
208,693 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
554,239 |
|
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
542,921 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
27,297 |
|
|
|
13,642 |
|
|
|
13,655 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,186,384 |
|
|
$ |
59,851 |
|
|
$ |
4,126,533 |
|
|
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than- temporary, the
value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which
include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been
less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3)
actual collateral attributes (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of
the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse
conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7)
managements intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that Popular would
be required to sell the security before a forecasted recovery occurs.
At June 30, 2009, management performed its quarterly analysis of all securities with an unrealized
loss and concluded no material individual securities were other-than-temporarily impaired. At June
30, 2009, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities in an unrealized loss
position and
it is not more likely than not that
the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to
recovery of their amortized cost basis.
23
The unrealized losses associated with Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions are primarily associated to approximately $45 million in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Appropriation Bonds (Appropriation Bonds). The rating on these bonds by Moodys Investors Service
(Moodys) is Ba1, one notch below investment grade, while Standard & Poors (S&P) rates them as
investment grade. During early June, S&P Rating Services affirmed its BBB- rating on the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico general obligations and appropriation debt outstanding, which indicates
S&Ps opinion that Puerto Ricos appropriation credit profile is not speculative grade. The outlook
indicated by S&P is stable. These securities will continue to be monitored as part of managements
ongoing OTTI assessments. Management expects to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire
amortized cost basis of the securities.
The
unrealized losses reported for Collateralized mortgage
obligations federal agencies are
principally associated to floating rate securities. These CMOs were issued by U.S.
government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), institutions which the government
has affirmed its commitment to support, and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). The
contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. Government. In
the latter half of 2008, the U.S. Government provided substantial liquidity to FNMA and FHLMC to
bolster their creditworthiness. These collateralized mortgage obligations are rated AAA by the
major rating agencies and are backed by residential mortgages. The unrealized losses in
this portfolio were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and levels of market
liquidity relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to credit quality
of the securities.
The unrealized losses associated with private-label collateralized mortgage obligations are
primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. The losses related primarily to
adjustable rate mortgages with lower coupons. In addition to verifying the credit ratings for the
private label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan collateral for these bonds.
Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO, including among others, the
weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and foreclosure rates of the underlying
assets in the securities. As of June 30, 2009, there were no sub-prime or Alt-A securities in
the Corporations private-label CMO portfolios. For private-label CMOs with unrealized losses as of
June 30, 2009, credit impairment was assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows
on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The
model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to
various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and
credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash
flows through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of
assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates. Managements assessment
also considered tests using more stressful parameters. Based on the assessments, management
concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by the Corporation were not
other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009, thus management expects to recover the amortized
cost basis of the securities.
All of the Corporations securities classified as mortgage-backed securities were issued by U.S.
government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily GNMA and FNMA, thus as previously expressed,
have the guarantee or support of the U.S. government. These mortgage-backed securities are rated
AAA by the major rating agencies and are backed by residential mortgages. Most of the MBS
securities held as of June 30, 2009 with unrealized losses had been purchased at a premium during
2009 and although their fair values have declined, they continue to exceed the par value of the
securities. The unrealized losses in this portfolio were generally attributable to changes in
interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to credit
quality of the securities.
24
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale during the six months ended June
30, 2009 were $3.7 billion compared to $2.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Gross
realized gains and losses on the sale of securities available-for-sale for the quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
$ |
28,255 |
|
|
$ |
184,380 |
|
|
$ |
29,350 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
Total net gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
28,255 |
|
|
$ |
184,145 |
|
|
$ |
29,231 |
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized through earnings
approximately $6.6 million in losses in equity securities classified as available-for-sale that
management considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. During the six months ended June 30,
2008, the Corporation recognized through earnings approximately $2.9 million in losses considered
other-than-temporary on residual interests classified as available-for-sale, which are included as
part of Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statement of
operations.
The following table states the names of issuers and the aggregate amortized cost and market value
of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in
which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities of the U.S. Government agencies and corporations. Investments in
obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are
payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S.
Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
1,230,691 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,198,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,137,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,131,842 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,465,847 |
|
|
|
1,532,656 |
|
|
|
4,389,271 |
|
|
|
4,651,249 |
|
|
|
4,506,509 |
|
|
|
4,521,314 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
999,435 |
|
|
|
1,006,425 |
|
|
|
884,414 |
|
|
|
875,493 |
|
|
|
816,570 |
|
|
|
810,182 |
|
|
25
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and approximate market value (or fair
value for certain investment securities where no market quotations are available) of investment
securities held-to-maturity as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,809 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106,985 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,992 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,245 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
109,280 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
15,488 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
50,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
45,028 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
283,388 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
|
276,788 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,647 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
320,061 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
6,750 |
|
|
$ |
313,462 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106,910 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,918 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
108,860 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
108,844 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
16,170 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
16,554 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
52,730 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
47,704 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
284,670 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
280,020 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,633 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,383 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
294,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
290,134 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
% |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Gross |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
34,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
34,076 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
113,705 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
113,839 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
15,902 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
15,928 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
54,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
52,923 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
185,852 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
184,566 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7,285 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,280 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,316 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
232,483 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
231,210 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
% |
|
The following table shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and market
value of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30,
2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
68,400 |
|
|
$ |
6,654 |
|
|
$ |
61,746 |
|
Others |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,400 |
|
|
$ |
6,654 |
|
|
$ |
64,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
69,045 |
|
|
$ |
6,737 |
|
|
$ |
62,308 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Others |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,526 |
|
|
$ |
6,750 |
|
|
$ |
65,776 |
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
135,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
$ |
130,198 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,900 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
$ |
130,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
9,535 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
9,363 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,029 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
145,185 |
|
|
$ |
5,624 |
|
|
$ |
139,561 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Others |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,929 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
140,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
34,085 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
34,077 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
41,694 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
40,128 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,779 |
|
|
$ |
1,574 |
|
|
$ |
74,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
34,085 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
34,077 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
41,694 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
40,128 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,046 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
75,455 |
|
|
As indicated in Note 6 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
as of June 30, 2009 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto
Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs periodic
credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value at June 30, 2009 was
attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, thus no other-than-temporary
decline in value was necessary to be recorded in these held-to-maturity securities as of June 30,
2009. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities
held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these
investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Note 8 Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights
are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. The mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Prior to November 2008, PFH also held
servicing rights to residential mortgage loan portfolios. These servicing rights were sold in the
fourth quarter of 2008. The MSRs are segregated between loans serviced by the Corporations banking
subsidiaries and by PFH. PFH no longer services third-party loans due to the discontinuance of the
business. Fair value determination is performed on a subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in
accordance with the types of assets or markets served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late
fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporations loan
characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The following tables present the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking subsidiaries |
|
Fair value at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
176,034 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
727 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
13,661 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans (1) |
|
|
(7,921 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
Fair value as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
180,808 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential MSRs |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Banking subsidiaries |
|
PFH |
|
Total |
|
Fair value at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
110,612 |
|
|
$ |
81,012 |
|
|
$ |
191,624 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans (1) |
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
|
(13,180 |
) |
|
|
(18,798 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
(11,568 |
) |
|
|
(5,178 |
) |
|
Fair value as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
129,891 |
|
|
$ |
56,264 |
|
|
$ |
186,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $17.7 billion as of June 30, 2009
(December 31, 2008 $17.6 billion; June 30, 2008
$20.4 billion, including $8.2 billion related to the
PFH discontinued operations).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, representing changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the Corporations continuing operations for the quarter and six months ended June
30, 2009 amounted to $11.3 million and $23.0 million, respectively, and $7.2 million and $14.4
million, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008. The banking subsidiaries
receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. For the period ended
June 30, 2009, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.26% (June 30, 2008 0.25%).
Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not earn significant prepayment
penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs,
originated and purchased.
Banking subsidiaries
The Corporations banking subsidiaries retain servicing responsibilities on the sale of wholesale
mortgage loans and under pooling / selling arrangements of mortgage loans into mortgage-backed
securities, primarily GNMA and FNMA securities. Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the
banking subsidiaries have fixed rates.
During the six months period ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation retained servicing rights on
guaranteed mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales involving approximately
$805 million in principal balance outstanding. Gains of approximately $26.4 million were realized
on these transactions during the six months period ended June 30, 2009.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and year ended December 31,
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Prepayment speed |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
15.0 years |
|
8.6 years |
Discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
30
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
94,879 |
|
|
$ |
104,614 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
7.3 years |
|
10.2 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(4,407 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,734 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
(8,726 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,033 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.75 |
% |
|
|
11.46 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(3,112 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,769 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
(6,253 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,142 |
) |
|
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial
institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the
sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions as of period end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
85,929 |
|
|
|
$ |
71,420 |
|
Weighted average life of collateral |
|
8.3 years |
|
|
7.0 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed
(annual rate) |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(4,801 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(3,880 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(8,191 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(7,096 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate
(annual rate) |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(4,050 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(6,742 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(4,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are
hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value
based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses),
which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation serviced $4.7 billion (December 31, 2008 $4.9 billion; June
30, 2008 $3.7 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase, at its
option and without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed
mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual
loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation
is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation
had recorded $88 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this buy-back
option program (December 31, 2008 $61 million; June 30, 2008 $41 million).
31
Note 9 Other Assets
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation
allowance) |
|
$ |
390,467 |
|
|
$ |
357,507 |
|
|
$ |
807,884 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
228,675 |
|
|
|
224,634 |
|
|
|
219,867 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
136,634 |
|
|
|
136,236 |
|
|
|
198,286 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
91,558 |
|
|
|
92,412 |
|
|
|
108,008 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
76,019 |
|
|
|
109,656 |
|
|
|
50,121 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
66,943 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
515,273 |
|
Securitization advances and related assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,519 |
|
Others |
|
|
224,553 |
|
|
|
193,466 |
|
|
|
256,884 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,214,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,597 |
|
|
$ |
2,455,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Other assets from discontinued operations at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 are presented as part of Assets from discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of condition. Refer to Note
3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on
the discontinued operations. |
Note 10 Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report for a
complete description of the Corporations derivative activities.
The use of derivatives is incorporated as part of the Corporations overall interest rate risk
management strategy to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that
are caused by interest rate volatility. The Corporations goal is to manage interest rate
sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets
and liabilities so that the net interest income is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by
movements in interest rates. The Corporation uses derivatives in its trading activities to
facilitate customer transactions, to take proprietary positions and as a means of risk management.
As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed and variable interest rate assets and
liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized
appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporations gains or
losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. As a
matter of policy, the Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments for interest
rate risk management.
By using derivative instruments, the Corporation exposes itself to credit and market risk. If a
counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, the
Corporations credit risk will equal the fair value gain in a derivative. Generally, when the fair
value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes the
Corporation, thus creating a repayment risk for the Corporation. To manage the level of credit
risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting
agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. The derivative assets
include a $4.2 million negative adjustment as a result of the credit risk of the counterparty as of
June 30, 2009. In the other hand, when the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the
Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, the fair value of derivative liabilities
incorporates nonperformance risk or the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled. The
derivative liabilities include a $1.2 million positive adjustment related to the incorporation of
the Corporations own credit risk as of June 30, 2009.
Certain of the Corporations derivative instruments contain provisions that require its senior debt
to maintain an investment grade rating from certain major credit rating agencies. Under these
derivative agreements, if the Corporations senior debt rating falls below investment grade, the
counterparties to the derivative instruments are entitled to request immediate payment or demand
immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability
positions. The credit contingent features underlying these agreements were
32
triggered as of June 30,
2009 since the Corporations senior debt was rated below investment grade. The aggregate fair value
of all
derivative instruments with credit-risk related contingent features that were in a liability
position as of June 30, 2009 was $72 million. The Corporation has fully collateralized these
positions by posting collateral of $79 million as of June 30, 2009.
Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges or non-hedging derivatives outstanding as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
Fair |
|
Condition |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
179,755 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133 |
|
$ |
179,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
156,591 |
|
|
Trading Account Securities |
|
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
1,043,845 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
70,295 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
340 |
|
- swaps offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
1,043,845 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
73,589 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with clients |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparty |
|
|
255 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps and floors |
|
|
139,969 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate caps and floors for the benefit of corporate clients |
|
|
139,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
193,227 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
140,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133 |
|
$ |
2,858,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,628 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
3,038,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Condition |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
112,500 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133 |
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
272,301 |
|
|
Trading Account Securities |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
4,733 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
1,038,908 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
100,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
1,038,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
98,437 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with clients |
|
|
377 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparty |
|
|
373 |
|
|
Other Assets |
| |
|
16 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
128,284 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate caps for the benefit of corporate clients |
|
|
128,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
208,557 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
8,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
178,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
8,584 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133 |
|
$ |
2,994,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,874 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
3,307,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,509 |
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
The Corporation utilizes forward contracts to hedge the sale of mortgage-backed securities with
duration terms over one month. Interest rate forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery of
securities, which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date at a specified price or
yield. These forward contracts are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow
hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended. Changes in the fair value of the
derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income. The amount included in accumulated other
comprehensive income corresponding to these forward contracts is expected to be reclassified to
earnings in the next twelve months. These contracts have a maximum remaining maturity of 79 days.
34
For cash flow hedges, gains and losses on derivative contracts that are reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to current period earnings are included in the line item
which the hedged item is recorded and in the same period in which the forecasted transaction
affects earnings, as presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
and Amount |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
(1,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income |
|
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
and Amount |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
(1,623 |
) |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
(3,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(1,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income |
|
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Non-Hedging Activities
For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized a loss of $1.8
million and $14.1 million, respectively, related to its non-hedging derivatives, as detailed in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Classification of Gain |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
(In thousands) |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
(6,848 |
) |
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
(5,524 |
) |
Credit derivatives |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(2,599 |
) |
|
|
(2,599 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Indexed options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,125 |
) |
|
35
Forward Contracts
The Corporation has forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities with terms lasting less
than a month, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. Changes in their fair value are
recognized in trading gains and losses.
Interest Rates Swaps and Foreign Currency and Exchange Rate Commitments
In addition to using derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy,
the Corporation also utilizes derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange
contracts, in its capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers. The Corporation minimizes
its market risk and credit risk by taking offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions
with credit limit approvals and monitoring procedures. Market value changes on these swaps and
other derivatives are recognized in income in the period of change.
Interest Rate Caps
The Corporation enters into interest rate caps as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and
simultaneously takes offsetting positions under the same terms and
conditions; thus minimizing its
market and credit risks.
Note 11 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 25 for the definition of the
Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
31,840 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
117,545 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
607,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
35,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,256 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
136,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,845 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
8,777 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
46,125 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,414 |
) |
|
|
44,711 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
630,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
(677 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,411 |
) |
|
$ |
628,826 |
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments consist of adjustments to the value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed resulting from the completion of appraisals or other valuations, adjustments to
initial estimates recorded for transaction costs, if any, and contingent consideration paid during
a contractual contingency period. The purchase accounting adjustments in the EVERTEC reportable
segment for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are related to contingency payments.
36
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had $6 million of identifiable
intangibles, other than goodwill, with indefinite useful lives (December 31, 2008 $6 million; June 30, 2008 $17
million).
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
27,560 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
24,130 |
|
|
$ |
66,040 |
|
|
$ |
26,141 |
|
|
Other customer
relationships |
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
8,839 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
9,852 |
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
8,219 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
77,176 |
|
|
$ |
35,078 |
|
|
$ |
77,255 |
|
|
$ |
30,440 |
|
|
$ |
84,111 |
|
|
$ |
37,094 |
|
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $2.4 million in
amortization related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (June 30, 2008 $2.5 million).
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $4.8 million in amortization
related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (June 30, 2008 $5.0 million).
The following table presents the estimated aggregate annual amortization of the intangible assets
with definite useful lives for each of the following fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
4,644 |
|
Year 2010 |
|
|
7,671 |
|
Year 2011 |
|
|
6,982 |
|
Year 2012 |
|
|
5,967 |
|
Year 2013 |
|
|
5,784 |
|
Year 2014 |
|
|
5,146 |
|
|
Note 12 Fair Value Measurement
SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken
down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3- Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed price or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use
37
market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used
in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on January 1,
2009.
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
3,543 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
7,208 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
7,246 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States
and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total trading
account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to
SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
7,477 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
7,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7,883 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
7,925 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States
and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total trading
account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to
SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
8,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7,651 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
7,699 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States
and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Total trading
account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Residual interests trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to
SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
|
$ |
9,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured at fair value
pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(233 |
) |
|
40
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
March 31, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
of June 30, |
|
held as of |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- backed
securities |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage- backed
securities-
federal agencies |
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading
account
securities |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(b) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to SFAS
No. 159 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
of June 30, |
|
held as of |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- backed
securities |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage- backed
securities-
federal agencies |
|
|
292 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading
account
securities |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
)(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to SFAS
No. 159 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
March 31, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
of June 30, |
|
held as of |
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- backed
securities |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage- backed
securities- federal
agencies |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading
account
securities |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
trading |
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)(b) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)(b) |
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to SFAS
No. 159 |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured
at fair value pursuant
to SFAS No. 159 |
|
$ |
(186 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(186 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
of June 30, |
|
held as of |
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage- backed
securities- federal
agencies |
|
|
227 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading
account
securities |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
trading |
|
|
40 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
)(b) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)(b) |
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to SFAS
No. 159 |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
15 |
(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured
at fair value pursuant
to SFAS No. 159 |
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair
value on a recurring basis during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
44
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are
reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
45
Additionally, the Corporation may be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to
fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting,
identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves under SFAS No. 114, or write-downs of
individual assets. The following table presents financial and non-financial assets that were
subject to a fair value measurement on a non-recurring basis during the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 and which were still included in the consolidated statement of condition as of June
30, 2009 and 2008. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate of the fair value measurements of
those assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other real estate owned (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other foreclosed assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on
the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114 (as amended by SFAS No. 118). |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were
measured at fair value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on
the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114 (as amended by SFAS No. 118). |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured
based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114 (as amended by SFAS No. 118). |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the
financial instruments presented in these note disclosures do not represent managements estimate of
the underlying value of the Corporation.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities. The fair value of U.S. agency securities
is based on an active exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities.
The U.S. agency securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are priced
based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market
sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are
classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced using
an internally-prepared pricing matrix with quoted prices from local broker dealers. These
particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These investment
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
47
|
|
|
Corporate securities and mutual funds (included as other in the trading account
securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker
dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly
liquid markets, the corporate securities and mutual funds are classified as Level 2. The
important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares
are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based
on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and index options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are exchange-traded, such as futures and options,
or are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities
(TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified as Level 2. The non-performance risk is
determined using internally-developed models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term,
and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available public data or
internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability of default.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayments assumptions, delinquency rates, late
charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the
unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under SFAS No. 114 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114 (as amended by SFAS No. 118).
Currently, the associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounting cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal
adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Note 13 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
48
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value. For
disclosures about the fair value of derivative instruments refer to Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In different interest rate
environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate
financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value
of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is,
they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and assumptions
used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are described in the
paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated
statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, bankers acceptances, customers liabilities
on acceptances, federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term
borrowings, and acceptances outstanding. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities
are valued using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements
with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statement of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes. These instruments are detailed in the consolidated
statements of condition and in Notes 6 and 7.
The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale is based on secondary market prices. The fair
values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar
characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential
mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan
characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, the fair
values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented
groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market
participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery
assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted
accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore
it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and money market accounts is, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount
payable on demand as of the respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on
the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates
with similar maturities. The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in
part dependent of the buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes
occurs. Therefore, the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary
significantly from the presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
49
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collaterization levels as part of its evaluation of non-performance risk.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit is based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
Carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
1,613,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,613,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,641 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,641 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
487,182 |
|
|
|
487,182 |
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
7,246,459 |
|
|
|
7,246,459 |
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
320,061 |
|
|
|
313,462 |
|
|
|
294,747 |
|
|
|
290,134 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
214,923 |
|
|
|
216,551 |
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
|
|
255,830 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
242,847 |
|
|
|
249,856 |
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
541,576 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
23,459,823 |
|
|
|
21,330,133 |
|
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
|
17,383,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
26,913,485 |
|
|
$ |
27,083,828 |
|
|
$ |
27,550,205 |
|
|
$ |
27,793,826 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,471 |
|
|
|
144,471 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,941,678 |
|
|
|
3,075,859 |
|
|
|
3,407,137 |
|
|
|
3,592,236 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,643,722 |
|
|
|
2,229,924 |
|
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
|
|
3,257,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
7,196,232 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
7,116,977 |
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
186,078 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
199,795 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
50
Note 14 Borrowings
The composition of federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
144,471 |
|
|
$ |
625,000 |
|
Assets sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
2,941,678 |
|
|
|
3,407,137 |
|
|
|
4,113,677 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,941,678 |
|
|
$ |
3,551,608 |
|
|
$ |
4,738,677 |
|
|
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity at
fixed rates ranging from 2.23% to 2.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
675,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances under credit facilities with other institutions at
fixed rates ranging from 2.50% to 2.94% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured borrowings with private investors at a fixed rate of 0.40% |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes purchased paying interest at maturity at
fixed rates ranging from 2.20% to 3.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term funds purchased paying interest at fixed rates
ranging from 2.26% to 2.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
2,757 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,210 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the borrowings
outstanding as of such date.
51
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-with maturities ranging from 2010 through 2015 paying interest at monthly
fixed rates ranging from 1.48% to 5.06% (June 30, 2008 - 2.67% to
6.98%) |
|
$ |
1,107,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,050,741 |
|
|
$ |
961,817 |
|
-maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10%
(June 30, 2008 - 5.04% to 6.55%) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances under revolving lines of credit with maturities ranging from 2008 to
2009 paying interest quarterly at floating rates ranging from 0.20% to
0.27% over the 3-month LIBOR rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes maturing in 2030 paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from
3.00% to 6.00% |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2009 to 2013 paying interest
semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 5.20% to 9.75% (June 30, 2008 -
3.88% to 6.85%) |
|
|
383,720 |
|
|
|
995,027 |
|
|
|
1,519,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2009 to 2013 paying interest
monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes maturing in 2011 paying interest quarterly at a floating rate of
6.00% (June 30, 2008 - 0.40%) over the 3-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
435,543 |
|
|
|
199,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings at fair value paying interest monthly at fixed rates
ranging from 6.04% to 7.04% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings at fair value paying interest monthly at floating rates
ranging from 2.53% to 3.38% over the 1-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes linked
to the S&P 500 Index maturing in 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures with maturities
ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from
6.13% to 8.33% (Refer to Note 15) |
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
27,336 |
|
|
|
28,903 |
|
|
|
29,019 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,643,722 |
|
|
$ |
3,386,763 |
|
|
$ |
3,924,372 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the borrowings
outstanding as of such date. Key index rates as of June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008, respectively, were as follows: 1-month LIBOR rate =0.31% and 2.46%;
3-month LIBOR rate = 0.60% and 2.78%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 3.54% and
3.97%.
The holders of $25 million of certain of the Corporations fixed-rate notes and $250 million
of the Corporations floating rate notes have the right to require the Corporation to purchase the
notes on each quarterly interest payment date beginning in March 2010. The holders of $175 million
of those floating-rate notes also have the right to require the Corporation to repurchase the
notes, in whole or in part, on each of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2009, at a price equal
to 99% of their principal amount. These notes were issued by the Corporation in 2008 and mature in
2011, subject to the right of investors to require their earlier repurchase by the Corporation.
Included in the table above is $350 million in term notes with interest that adjusts in the event
of senior debt rating downgrades. As a result of rating downgrades by the major rating agencies in
April 2009 and June 2009, the cost of the senior debt increased prospectively by an additional 225
basis points. The senior debt consists of term notes of $75 million with a fixed rate of 9.75% as
of June 30, 2009, $25 million with a fixed rate of 9.41% as of June 30, 2009 and $250 million in
term notes with floating rates at 3-month LIBOR plus 6.00% as of June 30, 2009. These term notes
mature in 2011.
52
Note 15 Trust Preferred Securities
As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had established four trusts for the purpose of
issuing trust preferred securities (the capital securities) to the public. The proceeds from such
issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts
(the common securities), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures (the junior subordinated debentures) issued by the Corporation. The sole
assets of the trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation and the
related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the Corporation under the
provisions of FIN No. 46(R).
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2008 follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BanPonce |
|
|
Popular Capital |
|
|
America Capital |
|
|
Popular Capital |
|
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust II |
|
|
Issuance date |
|
February 1997 |
|
|
October 2003 |
|
|
September 2004 |
|
|
November 2004 |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
Common securities |
|
$ |
4,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,279 |
|
|
$ |
7,732 |
|
|
$ |
4,021 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
148,640 |
|
|
$ |
309,279 |
|
|
$ |
257,732 |
|
|
$ |
134,021 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
December 2034 |
|
Reference notes |
|
|
(a),(c),(e),(f),(g) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
(a),(c),(f) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and
indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(b) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(c) |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the
capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(d) |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by
the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(e) |
|
The original issuance was for $150 million. The Corporation had reacquired $6 million of
the 8.327% capital securities. |
|
(f) |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal
Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below,
the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior
subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated
maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements,
in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment
company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
(g) |
|
Same as (f) above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early
redemption. |
The capital securities of Popular Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II are traded on
the NASDAQ under the symbols BPOPN and BPOPM, respectively.
The outstanding trust preferred securities are
subject to the Exchange Offer described in Note 27
to these consolidated financial statements, which is expected to change the outstanding amount of
the trust preferred securities. Also, in connection with the Exchange Offer described in Note 27
to these consolidated financial statements, the U.S. Treasury has agreed with the Corporation that
the U.S. Treasury will exchange all of its outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock (described
in Note 16Stockholders Equity) for $935 million of newly issued trust preferred securities (the New Trust Preferred Securities).
53
Note 16 Stockholders Equity
On May 1, 2009, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
470,000,000 shares to 700,000,000 shares. The stockholders also approved to decrease the par value
of the common stock of the Corporation from $6 per share to $0.01 per share. The decrease in the
par value of the Corporations common stock had no effect on the total dollar value of the
Corporations stockholders equity. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation
transferred an amount equal to the product of the number of shares issued and outstanding and $5.99
(the difference between the old and new par values), from the common stock account to surplus
(additional paid-in capital).
On February 19, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Corporation resolved to retire 13,597,261
shares of the Corporations common stock that were held by the Corporation as treasury shares. It
is the Corporations accounting policy to account, at retirement, for the excess of the cost of the
treasury stock over its par value entirely to surplus. The impact of the retirement is depicted in
the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
The Corporations authorized preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, and the shares of
each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when
authorizing the issuance of that particular series. The Corporations preferred stock outstanding
as of June 30, 2009 consisted of:
|
|
|
6.375% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A, no par value,
liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2003
Series A Preferred Stock amounted to approximately $3.0 million for each of the quarters
ended June 30, 2009, and 2008 and $6.0 million for each of the six-month periods ended June
30, 2009 and 2008. |
|
|
|
|
8.25% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2008 Series B, no par value,
liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2008
Series B Preferred Stock amounted to approximately $8.3 million for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 (June 30, 2008 $3.0 million) and $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 (June 30, 2008 $3.0 million). |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation preference
per share issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury) in December 2008,
under the Capital Purchase Program established by the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a
warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of Populars common stock at an exercise price of
$6.70 per share, which continues outstanding in full as of June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The shares of Series C Preferred Stock qualify as Tier I regulatory capital and pay
cumulative dividends quarterly (February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15) at a rate of
5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Corporation paid
cash dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock amounting to $11.7 million and $20.8 million
during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. |
Refer to the 2008 Annual Report for details on the terms of each class of preferred stock.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, cash dividends of $0.02 per common share outstanding
amounting to $5.6 million were paid to shareholders of the Corporations common stock (June 30,
2008 $0.16 per common share or $44.9 million). During the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash
dividends of $0.10 per common share outstanding amounting to $28.2 million were paid to
shareholders of the Corporations common stock (June 30, 2008 $0.32 per common share or $89.7
million).
The dividends paid to holders of the Corporations preferred stock must be declared by the
Corporations Board of Directors. On a regular basis, the Board reviews various factors when
considering the payment of dividends on the Corporations outstanding preferred stock, including
its capital levels, recent and projected financial results and liquidity. The Board is not
obligated to declare dividends and, except for the Series C Preferred Stock issued under the TARP
Capital Purchase Program, dividends do not accumulate in the event they are not paid.
In June 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common
stock and Series
A and B preferred stock.
54
The Corporations common stock ranks junior to all series of preferred stock as to dividend rights
and/or as to rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. All series of
preferred stock are pari passu. Dividends on each series of preferred stock are payable if
declared. The Corporations ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the
Corporation fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest dividend
period. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends in the future is limited by TARP
requirements, legal availability of funds, recent and projected financial results, capital levels
and liquidity of the Corporation, general business conditions and other factors deemed relevant by
the Corporations Board of Directors.
On June 29, 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue up to 390 million shares of its
common stock in exchange for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for the
trust preferred securities described in Note 15 Trust Preferred Securities. Refer to Note 27 to
these consolidated financial statements for information on the Exchange Offer.
Also, in connection with the Corporations Exchange Offer (described in Note 27 Exchange Offer), the U.S. Treasury has agreed with the Corporation that the U.S. Treasury will
exchange all of its outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock for $935 million of the New Trust
Preferred Securities.
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of June
30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $392 million; June 30, 2008 $374 million). There were no transfers
between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Note 17 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commercial letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit amounted to $18 million and $168
million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $19 million and $181 million; June
30, 2008 $21 million and $163 million). There were also other commitments outstanding and
contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.6 million (December 31, 2008 $0.7
million and June 30, 2008 $0.6 million), which represents the fair value of the obligations
undertaken in issuing the guarantees under stand-by letters of credit. The fair value approximates
the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are deferred and are
recognized over the commitment period. The liability was included as part of other liabilities in
the consolidated statements of condition. The contract amounts in stand-by letters of credit
outstanding represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the Corporation could be
required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the customers. These
stand-by letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire
without being drawn upon. The Corporations stand-by letters of credit are generally secured, and
in the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Corporation has rights to the underlying
collateral provided, which normally includes cash and marketable securities, real estate,
receivables and others. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these
instruments.
The Corporation securitizes mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell loans subject
to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These
representations and warranties may relate to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation,
collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase
the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties. Generally, the
Corporation retains the right to service the loans when securitized or sold with credit recourse.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation serviced $4.7 billion (December 31, 2008 $4.9 billion and
June 30, 2008 $3.7 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse or other
servicer-provided credit enhancement. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit
recourse provided, the Corporation is required to reimburse the
55
third party investor for loss or repurchase the loan. The maximum potential amount of future
payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the agreement in the event of
nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential
mortgage loans serviced. In the event of nonperformance, the Corporation has rights to the
underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan, thus, historically, the losses associated to
these guarantees have not been significant. As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had reserves of
approximately $13 million (December 31, 2008 $14 million and June 30, 2008 $7 million) to cover
the estimated credit loss exposure. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation also serviced $13.0 billion
(December 31, 2008 $12.7 billion and June 30, 2008 $16.7 billion) in mortgage loans without
recourse or other servicer-provided credit enhancement. Although the Corporation may, from time to
time, be required to make advances to maintain a regular flow of scheduled interest and principal
payments to investors, including special purpose entities, this does not represent an insurance
against losses. These loans serviced are mostly insured by FHA, VA, and others.
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, during 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for
the breach of certain representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by
the discontinued operations of PFH. Generally, the primary indemnifications included:
|
|
|
Indemnification for breaches of certain key representations and warranties, including
corporate authority, due organization, required consents, no liens or encumbrances,
compliance with laws as to origination and servicing, no litigation relating to violation of
consumer lending laws, and absence of fraud. |
|
|
|
|
Indemnification for breaches of all other representations including general litigation,
general compliance with laws, ownership of all relevant licenses and permits, compliance with
the sellers obligations under the pooling and servicing agreements, lawful assignment of
contracts, valid security interest, good title and all files and documents are true and
complete in all material respects, among others. |
Certain of the representations and warranties covered under these indemnifications expire within a
definite time period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations,
and others do not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate
liability defined as a percentage of the purchase price. In the event of a breach of a
representation, the Corporation may be required to repurchase the loan. The indemnifications
outstanding as of June 30, 2009 do not require the repurchase of loans under credit recourse
obligations. As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation has an indemnification reserve of approximately
$19 million for potential future claims under the indemnity clauses (December 31, 2008 $16
million), which is reported as part of Liabilities from discontinued operations in the consolidated
statement of condition. If there is a breach of a representation or warranty, the Corporation may
be required to repurchase the loan. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have
agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations. In
addition, the Corporation has agreed to restrict $10 million in cash or cash equivalents for a
period of one year expiring in November 2009 to cover any such obligations related to the major
sale transaction that involved the sale of loans representing approximately $1.0 billion in
principal balance during 2008.
The Corporation has also established reserves for representations and warranties on sold loans by
its subsidiary E-LOAN (the Company). As such, although the risk of loss or default is generally
assumed by the investors, the Company is required to make certain representations relating to
borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent that the Company does
not comply with such representations, it may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses or borrower defaults. In connection with a majority of its loan
sale agreements, E-LOAN is also responsible for ensuring that the borrower makes a minimum number
of payments on each loan, or the Company may be required to refund the premium paid to it by the
loan purchaser. These reserves, which are included as part of other liabilities in the
consolidated statement of condition, amounted to $15 million at June 30, 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation sold a lease financing portfolio of
approximately $0.3 billion. In conjunction with this sale, the Corporation recognized an
indemnification reserve of approximately $12 million to provide for any losses on the breach of
certain representations and warranties included in the sale agreement. This reserve is included as
part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
56
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $974 million
as of June 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $1.7 billion and June 30, 2008 $2.5 billion). In
addition, as of June 30, 2009, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed $824 million of capital
securities (December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 $824 million) issued by four wholly-owned
issuing trust entities that have been deconsolidated pursuant to FIN No. 46R. Refer to Note 15 to
the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of
these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early stages and management
cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and August 10, 2009, five putative class actions and one derivative claim were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, against Popular, Inc.
and certain of its directors and officers. Two of the class actions (Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al.
and Otero v. Popular, Inc., et al.) purport to be on behalf of purchasers of our securities between
January 23, 2008 and January 22, 2009 and allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by
issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading. The Otero action
also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and Section 15 of the
Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose material facts
necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading in connection with the offering of
the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. These securities class action complaints seek class
certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, including
counsel fees. These two actions have now been consolidated. The remaining class actions (Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montanez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.)
purport to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and
Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan between January 23,
2008 and the dates of the complaints to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409, 502(a)(2) and
502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against the Corporation, certain
directors, officers and members of plan committees, each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary.
The complaints allege that the defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among
other things, failing to eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The
complaints seek to recover alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive
relief and a constructive trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. These ERISA actions have now
been consolidated. The derivative claim (Garcia v. Carrion, et al.) is brought purportedly for the
benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers and directors and
alleges breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in connection with our
issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial reports and the
offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaint seeks a judgment that the action
is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and disbursements,
including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of operations.
57
Note 18 Other Service Fees
The caption of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the
following major categories that exceed one percent of the aggregate of total interest income plus
non-interest income for the quarters and six-months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
27,508 |
|
|
$ |
26,340 |
|
|
$ |
53,881 |
|
|
$ |
51,710 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,449 |
|
|
|
27,282 |
|
|
|
47,454 |
|
|
|
54,526 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
13,727 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
27,135 |
|
|
|
25,543 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
|
24,551 |
|
|
|
25,876 |
|
Sale and administration of
investment products |
|
|
9,694 |
|
|
|
8,079 |
|
|
|
17,023 |
|
|
|
19,076 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
15,512 |
|
|
|
19,788 |
|
|
|
30,926 |
|
|
|
34,616 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
102,437 |
|
|
$ |
108,117 |
|
|
$ |
200,970 |
|
|
$ |
211,347 |
|
|
Note 19 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Corporation has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and supplementary benefit pension
plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries.
In February 2009, BPPRs non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans (the
Plans) were frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009. This action
was taken by the Corporation to generate significant cost savings in light of the severe economic
downturn and decline in the Corporations financial performance; this measure will be reviewed
periodically as economic conditions and the Corporations financial situation improve. The pension
obligation and the assets were remeasured as of February 28, 2009. The impact of the plans
curtailment was included in the first quarter of 2009 as disclosed in the table below.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Benefit Restoration Plans |
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
Quarters ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
4,630 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
8,042 |
|
|
|
8,611 |
|
|
|
16,589 |
|
|
|
17,222 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(6,222 |
) |
|
|
(10,169 |
) |
|
|
(13,099 |
) |
|
|
(20,338 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
14,251 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
5,911 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
15,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
58
The Plans experienced a steep decline in the fair value of plan assets for the year ended
December 31, 2008, which resulted in a significant increase in the actuarial loss component of
accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2008. The increase in net periodic
pension cost, shown above, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the same period in 2008
was primarily due to the amortization of actuarial loss into pension expense and a lower expected
return on plan assets.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, contributions made to the pension and restoration plans
amounted to approximately $3.8 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year
2009 for the pension and restoration plans amount to approximately $18.2 million.
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
3,934 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
Total net periodic cost |
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
4,627 |
|
|
$ |
4,380 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan
amounted to approximately $1.9 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year
2009 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $6.1 million.
Note 20 Restructuring Plans
As indicated in the 2008 Annual Report, on October 17, 2008, the Board of Directors of Popular,
Inc. approved two restructuring plans for the BPNA reportable segment. The objective of the
restructuring plans is to improve profitability in the short-term, increase liquidity and lower
credit costs and, over time, achieve a greater integration with corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
BPNA Restructuring Plan
The restructuring plan for BPNAs banking operations (the BPNA Restructuring Plan) contemplates
the following measures: closing, consolidating or selling approximately 40 underperforming branches
in all existing markets; the shutting down, sale or downsizing of lending businesses that do not
generate deposits or fee income; and the reduction of general expenses associated with functions
supporting the aforementioned branch and balance sheet initiatives. The Corporation expects to
complete the BPNA Restructuring Plan by the end of 2009. The following table details the expenses
recognized during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 that were associated with this
particular restructuring plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
1,358 |
(a) |
|
$ |
4,278 |
(a) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
(b) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
|
$ |
4,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
|
(b) |
|
Impairment on long-lived assets |
59
As of June 30, 2009, the BPNA Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined charges for 2008 and
2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,481 |
|
|
$ |
14,195 |
|
|
$ |
19,676 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,934 |
|
|
$ |
18,546 |
|
|
$ |
24,480 |
|
|
The following table presents the activity during 2009 in the reserve for restructuring costs
associated with the BPNA Restructuring Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
10,852 |
|
Charges
during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,373 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(4,585 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,640 |
|
Charges
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,431 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
7,809 |
|
|
The reserve balances as of June 30, 2009 were mostly related to lease terminations.
Additional restructuring costs expected to be incurred associated with this restructuring plan are
estimated at $9.1 million.
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan
The E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan involved E-LOAN ceasing to operate as a direct lender, an event
that occurred in late 2008. E-LOAN continues to market deposit accounts under its name for the
benefit of BPNA and offers loan customers the option of being referred to a trusted consumer
lending partner. As part of the 2008 plan, all operational and support functions were transferred
to BPNA and EVERTEC. The 2008 E-LOAN Restructuring Plan is expected to be substantially completed
by the end of the third quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, E-LOANs workforce totaled 61 FTEs.
The following table details the expenses recognized during the quarter and six months ended June
30, 2009 that were associated with the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
885 |
(a) |
|
$ |
2,703 |
(a) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
As of June 30, 2009, the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined charges for
2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
21,998 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
5,834 |
|
|
$ |
24,701 |
|
|
60
The following table presents the activity in the reserve for restructuring costs associated
with the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
Charges
during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,818 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
Charges
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
885 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,482 |
|
|
The reserve balance as of June 30, 2009 was mostly associated with personnel costs.
Additional restructuring costs expected to be incurred associated with this restructuring plan are
estimated at $0.2 million.
The E-LOAN Restructuring Plan charges are part of the results of the BPNA reportable segment.
Note 21 Income Taxes
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
Additions
for tax positions January - March |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Reductions
as a result of settlements January - March |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
Additions
for tax positions April - June |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Reductions
as a result of settlements April - June |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30 |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the related accrued interest approximated $6.3 million (June 30, 2008 -
$3.6 million). Management determined that as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 there was no need to accrue
for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $46.8 million as of June 30,
2009 (June 30, 2008 $26.7 million).
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of June
30, 2009, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction 2007
and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction 2004 and thereafter. The U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of the Corporations U.S. operations tax return
for 2007 which is still in process. Although the outcomes of the tax audits are uncertain, the
Corporation believes that adequate amounts of tax and interest have been provided for any
adjustments that are expected to result from open years. The Corporation does not anticipate a
significant change to the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
61
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward and other credits available |
|
$ |
11,463 |
|
|
$ |
74,676 |
|
Net operating losses carryforward available |
|
|
770,146 |
|
|
|
670,326 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
127,661 |
|
|
|
149,027 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
8,461 |
|
|
|
8,603 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
485,642 |
|
|
|
368,690 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
14,621 |
|
|
|
18,307 |
|
Unearned income |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Unrealized losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
8,103 |
|
|
|
11,263 |
|
SFAS. No 159 - Fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,132 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
37,111 |
|
|
|
34,223 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,465,606 |
|
|
|
1,351,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between assigned values and the tax basis of the
assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations |
|
|
23,464 |
|
|
|
21,017 |
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
10,728 |
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
9,348 |
|
Unrealized net gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
16,787 |
|
|
|
78,761 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
17,465 |
|
|
|
13,232 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
77,644 |
|
|
|
133,586 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets less liabilities |
|
|
1,387,962 |
|
|
|
1,218,389 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
997,559 |
|
|
|
861,018 |
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
390,403 |
|
|
$ |
357,371 |
|
|
SFAS No.109 states that a deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if
based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more
than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation
allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based
on weighing all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. SFAS No. 109
provides that the realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible
temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same
character during the carryback or carryforward period. SFAS No.109 requires the consideration of
all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future
reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary
differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended June 30, 2009. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in
the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position in recent years is considered significant
negative evidence and has caused the Corporation to conclude that it will not be able to realize
the related deferred tax assets in the future. As of June 30, 2009, the Corporations U.S. mainland
operations net deferred tax assets amounted to $983 million with a valuation allowance of $998
million. The additional valuation allowance of $15 million is related to a deferred tax liability
on the indefinite-lived intangible assets, mainly at BPNA. Management will continue to reassess the
realization of the deferred tax assets each reporting period.
62
Note 22 Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. Nevertheless, all outstanding award grants under the Stock Option
Plan continue to remain in effect at June 30, 2009 under the original terms of the Stock Option
Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provides for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Remaining Life of |
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price of |
Range per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
In Years |
|
(fully vested) |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
$14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
1,325,463 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
1,325,463 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
$19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
1,376,965 |
|
|
$ |
25.23 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
1,287,983 |
|
|
$ |
25.09 |
|
|
$14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
2,702,428 |
|
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
2,613,446 |
|
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of June 30, 2009 was $0.2 million
(June 30, 2008 $2.1 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable as of June 30,
2009 and 2008.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
3,092,192 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(40,842 |
) |
|
|
26.29 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(85,507 |
) |
|
|
19.67 |
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,965,843 |
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(46,657 |
) |
|
|
26.20 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(216,758 |
) |
|
|
19.06 |
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,702,428 |
|
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
The stock options exercisable as of June 30, 2009 totaled 2,613,446 (June 30, 2008 -
2,738,512). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarters
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2008 and 2009.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized a credit of $0.1 million of stock
option expense, with an income tax expense of $51 thousand (June 30, 2008 $0.3 million, with a tax
benefit of $0.1 million). For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $27
thousand of stock option expense, with a tax benefit of $4 thousand (June 30, 2008 $0.6 million,
with a tax benefit of $0.2 million). The total unrecognized compensation cost as of June 30, 2009
related to non-vested stock option awards was $0.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 6 months.
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and / or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be made available from common stock purchased by
the Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.
The Corporations policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such
shares in the open market to cover each grant.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan and related
information to members of management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
303,686 |
|
|
$ |
22.37 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(50,648 |
) |
|
|
20.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,699 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
248,339 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(104,279 |
) |
|
|
21.94 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,518 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
140,542 |
|
|
$ |
23.56 |
|
|
During the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, no shares of
restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan corresponding to the
performance of 2008 and 2007.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance shares award consists of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.s common stock provided the Corporation achieves
certain performance goals during a 3-year performance cycle. The compensation cost associated with
the performance shares will be recorded ratably over a three-year performance period. The
performance shares will be granted at the end of the three-year period and will be vested at
64
grant
date,
except when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause. In such
case, the participant will receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as if the Corporation
would have met the performance goal for the performance period. As of June 30, 2009, 33,700 (June
30, 2008 6,217) shares have been granted under this plan to terminated employees.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.6 million of restricted stock
expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million (June 30, 2008 -
$0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009,
the Corporation recognized $0.8 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive
awards, with a tax benefit of $0.3 million (June 30, 2008 $1.2 million, with a tax benefit of
$0.5 million). The fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $1.8 million at grant date
and $0.3 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall of $1.5 million that was recorded as an
additional income tax expense at the applicable income tax rate net of deferred tax asset valuation
allowance since the Corporation does not have any surplus due to windfalls. During the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.4 million of performance share expense, with a
tax benefit of $99 thousand. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Corporation recognized
$0.5 million of performance share expense, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million. During the
six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.2 million of performance share
expense, with a tax benefit of $21 thousand (June 30, 2008 $0.9 million, with a tax benefit of
$0.3 million). The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock
awards and performance shares to members of management as of June 30, 2009 was $9.6 million and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.85 years.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock under the Incentive Plan and related
information to members of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
56,025 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(56,025 |
) |
|
|
10.75 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
173,923 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(173,923 |
) |
|
|
3.26 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation granted 151,612 (June 30, 2008 -
41,926) shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR,
which became vested at grant date. During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of
restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $47
thousand (June 30, 2008 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $46 thousand). For the six-month
period ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation granted 173,923 (June 30, 2008 45,348) shares of
restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became
vested at grant date. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized
$0.2 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax
benefit of $94 thousand (June 30, 2008 $0.2 million, with a tax benefit of $91 thousand). The
fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during 2009 for directors was $0.6
million.
65
Note 23 (Loss) Earnings per Common Share
The computation of (loss) earnings per common share (EPS) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(176,583 |
) |
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
$ |
(219,159 |
) |
|
$ |
158,412 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
22,915 |
|
|
|
6,003 |
|
|
|
45,831 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
(207,810 |
) |
|
$ |
18,247 |
|
|
$ |
(285,010 |
) |
|
$ |
118,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
281,888,394 |
|
|
|
280,773,513 |
|
|
|
281,861,563 |
|
|
|
280,514,164 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
281,888,394 |
|
|
|
280,773,513 |
|
|
|
281,861,563 |
|
|
|
280,514,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options and under restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that
the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of
compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise
date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is
added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings
per share. Warrants and stock options that result in lower potential shares issued than shares
purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings
per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per share. For the
quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, there were 2,702,428 and 2,819,169 weighted
average antidilutive stock options outstanding, respectively (June 30, 2008 3,057,279 and
3,068,430). Additionally, the Corporation has outstanding 20,932,836 warrants issued to purchase
shares of common stock, which have an antidilutive effect as of June 30, 2009.
Note 24 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Additional disclosures on non-cash activities for the six-month period are listed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
71,766 |
|
|
$ |
52,926 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
19,757 |
|
|
|
21,219 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
91,523 |
|
|
|
74,145 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
29,332 |
|
|
|
422,103 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
91,985 |
|
|
|
35,482 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities (a) |
|
|
759,532 |
|
|
|
1,033,032 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on
securitizations or asset
transfers |
|
|
13,661 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in par value of common stock |
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes loans securitized into investment securities and
subsequently sold before quarter end. |
66
Note 25 Segment Reporting
The Corporations corporate structure consists of three reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico, Banco Popular North America and EVERTEC. These reportable segments pertain only to the
continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements, the operations of Popular Financial Holdings, which were considered a
reportable segment in June 2008, were discontinued in the third quarter of 2008. Also, a corporate
group has been defined to support the reportable segments. The Corporation retrospectively adjusted
information in the statements of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 to
exclude results from discontinued operations and to conform them to the June 30, 2009 presentation.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets as of June 30, 2009, additional disclosures are provided for
the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR, which
are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the
lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR
allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market
rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well
as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on
retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the
lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and
lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan
originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the
investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the
investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the
brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency
and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk
Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries
generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. Popular Equipment
Finance, Inc. sold a substantial portion of its lease financing portfolio during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 and also ceased originations as part of BPNAs strategic plan. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across
the BPNA branch network.
EVERTEC:
This reportable segment includes the financial transaction processing and technology functions of
the Corporation, including EVERTEC, with offices in Puerto Rico, Florida, the Dominican Republic
and Venezuela; EVERTEC USA, Inc. incorporated in the United States; and ATH Costa Rica, S.A.,
EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA and T.I.I. Smart Solutions Inc. located in Costa Rica. In
addition, this reportable segment includes the equity investments in Consorcio de Tarjetas
Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Servicios Financieros, S.A. de C.V. (Serfinsa), which operate
in the Dominican Republic and El Salvador, respectively. This segment provides processing and
technology services to other units of the Corporation as well as to third parties, principally
other financial institutions in Puerto Rico, the Caribbean and Central America.
67
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank, excluding the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa,
which due to the nature of their operations are included as part of the EVERTEC segment. The
Corporate group also includes the expenses of the four administrative corporate areas that are
identified as critical for the organization: Finance, Risk Management, Legal and People, and
Communications.
For segment reporting purposes, the impact of recording the valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets of the U.S. operations was assigned to each legal entity within PNA (including PNA holding
company as an entity) based on each entitys net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2008 and June
30, 2009, except for PFH. The impact of recording the valuation allowance at PFH was allocated
among continuing and discontinued operations. The portion attributed to the continuing operations
was based on PFHs net deferred tax asset balance at January 1, 2008. The valuation allowance on
deferred taxes, as it relates to the operating losses of PFH for the year 2008 and six months ended
June 30, 2009, was assigned to the discontinued operations.
The tax impact in results of operations for PFH attributed to the recording of the valuation
allowance assigned to continuing operations was included as part of the Corporate group for segment
reporting purposes since it does not relate to any of the legal entities of the BPNA reportable
segment. PFH is no longer considered a reportable segment.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
The results of operations included in the tables below for the quarters and six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 exclude the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH. Segment
assets as of June 30, 2009 also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations.
2009
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
216,906 |
|
|
$ |
80,821 |
|
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
181,659 |
|
|
|
167,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
185,433 |
|
|
|
5,726 |
|
|
|
70,482 |
|
|
$ |
(36,866 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,730 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
200,380 |
|
|
|
88,561 |
|
|
|
41,484 |
|
|
|
(36,700 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,830 |
|
|
$ |
(174,229 |
) |
|
$ |
18,085 |
|
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
24,248,498 |
|
|
$ |
11,633,079 |
|
|
$ |
260,222 |
|
|
$ |
(47,848 |
) |
|
68
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
297,491 |
|
|
$ |
(14,698 |
) |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
283,060 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,444 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
224,775 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
(1,929 |
) |
|
|
225,839 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,554 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
293,725 |
|
|
|
19,469 |
|
|
|
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
311,658 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
10,100 |
|
|
|
(4,645 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(149,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
(176,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
36,093,951 |
|
|
$ |
5,429,459 |
|
|
$ |
(5,028,070 |
) |
|
$ |
36,495,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
433,068 |
|
|
$ |
157,341 |
|
|
$ |
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
332,993 |
|
|
|
388,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
496,254 |
|
|
|
9,497 |
|
|
|
132,010 |
|
|
$ |
(73,135 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
19,885 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
6,995 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
387,863 |
|
|
|
166,408 |
|
|
|
84,084 |
|
|
|
(72,869 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
186,641 |
|
|
$ |
(387,705 |
) |
|
$ |
27,966 |
|
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
589,928 |
|
|
$ |
(34,915 |
) |
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
555,546 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
564,626 |
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
|
|
560,570 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
32,437 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,603 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
565,486 |
|
|
|
34,419 |
|
|
|
(3,505 |
) |
|
|
596,400 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
(24,818 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(21,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(173,244 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,284 |
) |
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
(219,159 |
) |
|
69
2008
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
243,211 |
|
|
$ |
92,363 |
|
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
107,755 |
|
|
|
81,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
185,072 |
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
|
65,862 |
|
|
$ |
(37,919 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,537 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
197,188 |
|
|
|
94,146 |
|
|
|
44,002 |
|
|
|
(37,307 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
19,553 |
|
|
|
(24,779 |
) |
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,485 |
|
|
$ |
(34,319 |
) |
|
$ |
13,491 |
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
26,524,462 |
|
|
$ |
12,873,833 |
|
|
$ |
249,160 |
|
|
$ |
(119,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
335,340 |
|
|
$ |
(5,342 |
) |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
330,297 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
242,290 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(6,119 |
) |
|
|
235,798 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
17,763 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,332 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
298,029 |
|
|
|
15,087 |
|
|
|
(3,600 |
) |
|
|
309,516 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
(12,027 |
) |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
(12,581 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
71,295 |
|
|
$ |
(9,344 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,778 |
) |
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
39,528,420 |
|
|
$ |
7,915,418 |
(a) |
|
$ |
(5,765,244 |
) |
|
$ |
41,678,594 |
|
|
(a) Includes $2,013 million in assets from PFH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
487,883 |
|
|
$ |
187,803 |
|
|
$ |
(469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
210,234 |
|
|
|
140,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
362,758 |
|
|
|
83,097 |
|
|
|
135,572 |
|
|
$ |
(75,582 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
21,004 |
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
7,280 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
384,517 |
|
|
|
184,820 |
|
|
|
92,265 |
|
|
|
(74,812 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
42,065 |
|
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
9,852 |
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
191,313 |
|
|
$ |
(36,292 |
) |
|
$ |
25,253 |
|
|
$ |
(448 |
) |
|
70
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
675,217 |
|
|
$ |
(9,812 |
) |
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
$ |
666,056 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
350,361 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,401 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
505,845 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
(7,665 |
) |
|
|
500,549 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
35,516 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,669 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
586,790 |
|
|
|
30,788 |
|
|
|
(5,596 |
) |
|
|
611,982 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
(20,301 |
) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
4,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
179,826 |
|
|
$ |
(19,123 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,291 |
) |
|
$ |
158,412 |
|
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment
are as follows:
2009
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
73,823 |
|
|
$ |
139,947 |
|
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
216,906 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
122,606 |
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,659 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
27,585 |
|
|
|
131,776 |
|
|
|
26,274 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
185,433 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
5,756 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,730 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
53,617 |
|
|
|
130,241 |
|
|
|
16,601 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
200,380 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(31,664 |
) |
|
|
29,899 |
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(46,841 |
) |
|
$ |
45,695 |
|
|
$ |
7,950 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
6,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
10,158,302 |
|
|
$ |
17,310,758 |
|
|
$ |
669,492 |
|
|
$ |
(3,890,054 |
) |
|
$ |
24,248,498 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
148,318 |
|
|
$ |
278,226 |
|
|
$ |
6,185 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
433,068 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
217,469 |
|
|
|
115,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,993 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
104,627 |
|
|
|
344,807 |
|
|
|
47,264 |
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
496,254 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,599 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
8,733 |
|
|
|
10,509 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,885 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
103,572 |
|
|
|
253,436 |
|
|
|
30,988 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
387,863 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(56,169 |
) |
|
|
48,426 |
|
|
|
7,067 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(20,763 |
) |
|
$ |
193,027 |
|
|
$ |
14,366 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
186,641 |
|
|
71
2008
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
88,401 |
|
|
$ |
151,596 |
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
243,211 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
61,150 |
|
|
|
46,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,755 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
35,755 |
|
|
|
118,265 |
|
|
|
31,145 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
185,072 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,537 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
55,244 |
|
|
|
123,846 |
|
|
|
18,194 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
197,188 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(5,875 |
) |
|
|
20,025 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
19,553 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,781 |
|
|
$ |
72,397 |
|
|
$ |
10,229 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
92,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
11,461,433 |
|
|
$ |
19,066,945 |
|
|
$ |
791,390 |
|
|
$ |
(4,795,306 |
) |
|
$ |
26,524,462 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
181,759 |
|
|
$ |
299,986 |
|
|
$ |
5,857 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
487,883 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
118,018 |
|
|
|
92,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,234 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
61,156 |
|
|
|
245,946 |
|
|
|
55,775 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
362,758 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
7,352 |
|
|
|
13,043 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,004 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
102,273 |
|
|
|
246,905 |
|
|
|
35,497 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
384,517 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(6,405 |
) |
|
|
39,402 |
|
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
42,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,616 |
|
|
$ |
153,222 |
|
|
$ |
16,308 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
191,313 |
|
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segment are
as follows:
2009
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
78,817 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
80,821 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
131,823 |
|
|
|
35,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,785 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
17,934 |
|
|
|
(12,194 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
5,726 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
83,324 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
88,561 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(122,531 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,984 |
) |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
(174,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
12,188,040 |
|
|
$ |
651,805 |
|
|
$ |
(1,206,766 |
) |
|
$ |
11,633,079 |
|
|
72
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
149,731 |
|
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
$ |
157,341 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
318,375 |
|
|
|
70,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,980 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
26,803 |
|
|
|
(17,268 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
9,497 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
153,268 |
|
|
|
13,138 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
166,408 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
(7,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(301,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,024 |
) |
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
(387,705 |
) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
84,666 |
|
|
$ |
7,350 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
92,363 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
55,066 |
|
|
|
26,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,410 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
26,246 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
29,275 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
73,976 |
|
|
|
20,167 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
94,146 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(9,723 |
) |
|
|
(15,094 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(24,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(12,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,722 |
) |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
(34,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
13,151,497 |
|
|
$ |
1,053,195 |
|
|
$ |
(1,330,859 |
) |
|
$ |
12,873,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
173,133 |
|
|
$ |
13,996 |
|
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
$ |
187,803 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
87,347 |
|
|
|
52,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,127 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
72,169 |
|
|
|
11,267 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
83,097 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
6,318 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
146,970 |
|
|
|
37,844 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
184,820 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(27,556 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
(39,654 |
) |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
(36,292 |
) |
|
73
A breakdown of intersegment eliminations, particularly revenues, by segment in which the
revenues are recorded follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
INTERSEGMENT REVENUES* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
(130 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
EVERTEC |
|
|
(36,815 |
) |
|
|
(37,827 |
) |
|
|
(73,024 |
) |
|
|
(74,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intersegment revenues
from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(36,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,919 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,135 |
) |
|
$ |
(75,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For purposes of the intersegment revenues disclosure, revenues include interest income
(expense) related to internal funding and other income derived from intercompany
transactions, mainly related to processing / information technology services. |
|
A breakdown of revenues and selected balance sheet information by geographical area follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Geographic Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
406,155 |
|
|
$ |
426,504 |
|
|
$ |
913,285 |
|
|
$ |
849,106 |
|
United States |
|
|
69,915 |
|
|
|
112,910 |
|
|
|
128,998 |
|
|
|
258,828 |
|
Other |
|
|
32,829 |
|
|
|
26,681 |
|
|
|
73,833 |
|
|
|
58,671 |
|
|
Total consolidated
revenues from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
508,899 |
|
|
$ |
566,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,116,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of
investment securities, trading account profit (loss), gain (loss) on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, and other operating income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet Information: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
23,460,745 |
|
|
$ |
24,886,736 |
|
|
$ |
25,352,860 |
|
Loans |
|
|
14,622,320 |
|
|
|
15,160,033 |
|
|
|
15,442,742 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
16,896,704 |
|
|
|
16,737,693 |
|
|
|
16,462,795 |
|
Mainland United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,900,910 |
|
|
$ |
12,713,357 |
|
|
$ |
15,033,702 |
|
Loans |
|
|
9,511,048 |
|
|
|
10,417,840 |
|
|
|
11,524,665 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
8,880,892 |
|
|
|
9,662,690 |
|
|
|
9,342,281 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,133,685 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,292,032 |
|
Loans |
|
|
715,541 |
|
|
|
691,058 |
|
|
|
664,271 |
|
Deposits (2) |
|
|
1,135,889 |
|
|
|
1,149,822 |
|
|
|
1,310,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include balance sheet information of the discontinued operations for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. |
74
Note 26 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of
Registered Guaranteed Securities
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI),
Popular North America, Inc. (PNA), and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation as of June 30,
2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, and the results of their operations and cash flows for
the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries: ATH Costa Rica S.A., EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, T.I.I. Smart Solutions
Inc., Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. and PNA.
PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
PFH, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Equity One, Inc., and Popular Mortgage
Servicing, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular
Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC USA, Inc. |
PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.
The principal source of income for the PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR. As members subject to
the regulations of the Federal Reserve System, BPPR and BPNA must obtain the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared by each entity
during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the
Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any
required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. The payment
of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as
the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels. As of June 30, 2009, BPPR could have declared a
dividend of approximately $77 million (December 31, 2008 $32 million; June 30, 2008 $110
million) without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. As of June 30, 2009, BPNA was required
to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. The Corporation has
never received dividend payments from its U.S. subsidiaries. Refer to Popular, Inc.s Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 for further information on dividend restrictions imposed by
regulatory requirements and policies on the payment of dividends by BPPR and BPNA.
75
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
JUNE 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
662,124 |
|
|
$ |
(2,170 |
) |
|
$ |
661,852 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
47,185 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
951,611 |
|
|
|
(59,186 |
) |
|
|
951,647 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
197,125 |
|
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,046,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,246,459 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,794 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,017 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
320,061 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
188,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,923 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,182 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,915,614 |
|
|
|
577,113 |
|
|
|
1,238,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,731,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,847 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
53,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
24,732,416 |
|
|
|
(72,620 |
) |
|
|
24,717,321 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,259 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,146,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,146,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
53,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
23,474,978 |
|
|
|
(72,620 |
) |
|
|
23,459,823 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
17,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
596,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,366 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,553 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
134,710 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
135,978 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,189 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
91,245 |
|
|
|
67,255 |
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
|
|
1,069,808 |
|
|
|
(32,291 |
) |
|
|
1,214,849 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607,164 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,447 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,759,983 |
|
|
$ |
696,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,349 |
|
|
$ |
36,095,081 |
|
|
$ |
(5,327,859 |
) |
|
$ |
36,498,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,410,977 |
|
|
$ |
(2,112 |
) |
|
$ |
4,408,865 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,552,078 |
|
|
|
(47,458 |
) |
|
|
22,504,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,963,055 |
|
|
|
(49,570 |
) |
|
|
26,913,485 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,953,406 |
|
|
|
(11,728 |
) |
|
|
2,941,678 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
24,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,925 |
|
|
|
(70,620 |
) |
|
|
1,825 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
793,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
692,092 |
|
|
|
1,160,330 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
2,643,722 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
42,462 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
42,086 |
|
|
|
1,032,409 |
|
|
|
(32,599 |
) |
|
|
1,084,455 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
860,282 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
734,178 |
|
|
|
32,601,051 |
|
|
|
(596,517 |
) |
|
|
33,599,091 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,487,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
2,820 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,176,963 |
|
|
|
2,966,193 |
|
|
|
2,849,964 |
|
|
|
4,365,510 |
|
|
|
(10,172,873 |
) |
|
|
2,185,757 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(650,371 |
) |
|
|
(2,223,211 |
) |
|
|
(2,302,924 |
) |
|
|
(855,291 |
) |
|
|
5,372,632 |
|
|
|
(659,165 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(116,700 |
) |
|
|
(50,802 |
) |
|
|
(5,871 |
) |
|
|
(68,511 |
) |
|
|
125,184 |
|
|
|
(116,700 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2,899,701 |
|
|
|
696,141 |
|
|
|
541,171 |
|
|
|
3,494,030 |
|
|
|
(4,731,342 |
) |
|
|
2,899,701 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,759,983 |
|
|
$ |
696,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,349 |
|
|
$ |
36,095,081 |
|
|
$ |
(5,327,859 |
) |
|
$ |
36,498,792 |
|
|
76
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
and |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
7,668 |
|
|
$ |
777,994 |
|
|
$ |
(766 |
) |
|
$ |
784,987 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
89,694 |
|
|
|
40,614 |
|
|
|
450,246 |
|
|
|
794,521 |
|
|
|
(580,421 |
) |
|
|
794,654 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
188,893 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,730,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
431,499 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,998 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
294,747 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or
realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
190,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,611,053 |
|
|
|
324,412 |
|
|
|
1,348,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,283,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
827,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
25,885,773 |
|
|
|
(868,620 |
) |
|
|
25,857,237 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
827,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
24,878,662 |
|
|
|
(868,620 |
) |
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
22,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
598,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,807 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
204,955 |
|
|
|
(52,096 |
) |
|
|
156,227 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
35,664 |
|
|
|
64,881 |
|
|
|
21,532 |
|
|
|
995,550 |
|
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
1,115,597 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,163 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,222,145 |
|
|
$ |
436,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,854,868 |
|
|
$ |
38,586,431 |
|
|
$ |
(6,217,639 |
) |
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,294,221 |
|
|
$ |
(668 |
) |
|
$ |
4,293,553 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,747,393 |
|
|
|
(490,741 |
) |
|
|
23,256,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,041,614 |
|
|
|
(491,409 |
) |
|
|
27,550,205 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
44,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,596,817 |
|
|
|
(89,680 |
) |
|
|
3,551,608 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
42,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
828,285 |
|
|
|
(866,620 |
) |
|
|
4,934 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
793,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488,942 |
|
|
|
1,106,521 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
73,241 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
68,490 |
|
|
|
1,008,427 |
|
|
|
(53,937 |
) |
|
|
1,096,338 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
953,781 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,557,932 |
|
|
|
35,036,221 |
|
|
|
(1,933,646 |
) |
|
|
35,614,405 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,318 |
|
|
|
(56,281 |
) |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
613,085 |
|
|
|
2,301,193 |
|
|
|
2,184,964 |
|
|
|
4,050,514 |
|
|
|
(8,527,877 |
) |
|
|
621,879 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(365,694 |
) |
|
|
(1,797,175 |
) |
|
|
(1,865,418 |
) |
|
|
(585,705 |
) |
|
|
4,239,504 |
|
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(71,132 |
) |
|
|
(22,612 |
) |
|
|
33,460 |
|
|
|
60,284 |
|
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
436,847 |
|
|
|
296,936 |
|
|
|
3,550,210 |
|
|
|
(4,283,993 |
) |
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,222,145 |
|
|
$ |
436,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,854,868 |
|
|
$ |
38,586,431 |
|
|
$ |
(6,217,639 |
) |
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
77
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
7,646 |
|
|
$ |
879,893 |
|
|
$ |
(1,109 |
) |
|
$ |
887,619 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
435,200 |
|
|
|
38,700 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
897,796 |
|
|
|
(474,107 |
) |
|
|
897,796 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,692,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,702,327 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
456,490 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,743 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
232,483 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
213,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,731 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,989 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
499,488 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,546,533 |
|
|
|
306,970 |
|
|
|
1,485,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,338,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or market value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,552 |
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844,892 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
739,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685,000 |
|
|
|
26,633,984 |
|
|
|
(2,422,340 |
) |
|
|
26,636,004 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,770 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
739,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685,000 |
|
|
|
25,794,544 |
|
|
|
(2,422,340 |
) |
|
|
25,796,504 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
22,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
610,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,450 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,809 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
8,044 |
|
|
|
162,829 |
|
|
|
(8,443 |
) |
|
|
163,274 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,778 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
34,320 |
|
|
|
63,450 |
|
|
|
66,159 |
|
|
|
2,335,114 |
|
|
|
(43,201 |
) |
|
|
2,455,842 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628,826 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,223 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,251,177 |
|
|
$ |
420,852 |
|
|
$ |
3,264,824 |
|
|
$ |
41,460,190 |
|
|
$ |
(7,718,449 |
) |
|
$ |
41,678,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,483,338 |
|
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
|
$ |
4,482,287 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,672,348 |
|
|
|
(38,907 |
) |
|
|
22,633,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,155,686 |
|
|
|
(39,958 |
) |
|
|
27,115,728 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
223,500 |
|
|
|
4,950,377 |
|
|
|
(435,200 |
) |
|
|
4,738,677 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,193 |
|
|
|
1,796,357 |
|
|
|
(938,340 |
) |
|
|
1,337,210 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
$ |
476,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,212,215 |
|
|
|
2,546,294 |
|
|
|
(1,484,501 |
) |
|
|
3,750,647 |
|
Notes payable at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,725 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
68,544 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
69,684 |
|
|
|
769,568 |
|
|
|
(51,276 |
) |
|
|
856,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
545,183 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
2,984,592 |
|
|
|
37,822,007 |
|
|
|
(3,379,275 |
) |
|
|
37,972,600 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
586,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,767,721 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,819 |
|
|
|
(55,782 |
) |
|
|
1,767,721 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
554,306 |
|
|
|
851,193 |
|
|
|
734,964 |
|
|
|
2,810,895 |
|
|
|
(4,388,258 |
) |
|
|
563,100 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
1,095,167 |
|
|
|
(378,975 |
) |
|
|
(448,860 |
) |
|
|
815,083 |
|
|
|
3,958 |
|
|
|
1,086,373 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(90,448 |
) |
|
|
(55,420 |
) |
|
|
(5,874 |
) |
|
|
(39,122 |
) |
|
|
100,416 |
|
|
|
(90,448 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(207,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
(207,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,705,994 |
|
|
|
420,759 |
|
|
|
280,232 |
|
|
|
3,638,183 |
|
|
|
(4,339,174 |
) |
|
|
3,705,994 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,251,177 |
|
|
$ |
420,852 |
|
|
$ |
3,264,824 |
|
|
$ |
41,460,190 |
|
|
$ |
(7,718,449 |
) |
|
$ |
41,678,594 |
|
|
78
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(33,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
382,015 |
|
|
|
(4,006 |
) |
|
$ |
382,244 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
2,381 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
10,595 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
72,002 |
|
|
|
(7,016 |
) |
|
|
75,818 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
47,814 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
467,001 |
|
|
|
(44,364 |
) |
|
|
471,046 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,776 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
128,452 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
(4,006 |
) |
|
|
16,631 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
13,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,412 |
|
|
|
19,656 |
|
|
|
(7,301 |
) |
|
|
42,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,398 |
|
|
|
169,056 |
|
|
|
(11,631 |
) |
|
|
187,986 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
34,651 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(17,112 |
) |
|
|
297,945 |
|
|
|
(32,733 |
) |
|
|
283,060 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
34,651 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(17,112 |
) |
|
|
(51,499 |
) |
|
|
(32,733 |
) |
|
|
(66,384 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,463 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,983 |
|
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
102,437 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,705 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,839 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,453 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
(3,091 |
) |
|
|
10,855 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,276 |
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
(20,203 |
) |
|
|
172,943 |
|
|
|
(34,661 |
) |
|
|
159,455 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
6,464 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,079 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,355 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,206 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,024 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,202 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,084 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
24,423 |
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
27,048 |
|
Communications |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,386 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,331 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(10,517 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
49,868 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
38,968 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
327,552 |
|
|
|
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
330,645 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
31,735 |
|
|
|
5,072 |
|
|
|
(20,263 |
) |
|
|
(154,609 |
) |
|
|
(33,125 |
) |
|
|
(171,190 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
33,218 |
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
(22,247 |
) |
|
|
(159,549 |
) |
|
|
(33,063 |
) |
|
|
(176,583 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(209,801 |
) |
|
|
(190,825 |
) |
|
|
(176,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
577,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(176,583 |
) |
|
|
(185,767 |
) |
|
|
(199,176 |
) |
|
|
(159,549 |
) |
|
|
544,492 |
|
|
|
(176,583 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(183,182 |
) |
|
$ |
(192,366 |
) |
|
$ |
(205,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(166,148 |
) |
|
$ |
564,289 |
|
|
$ |
(183,182 |
) |
|
79
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,502 |
|
|
$ |
466,321 |
|
|
|
(29,123 |
) |
|
$ |
466,576 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
475 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
3,476 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,367 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
81,863 |
|
|
|
(7,015 |
) |
|
|
82,755 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
58,718 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
564,146 |
|
|
|
(81,962 |
) |
|
|
565,258 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,343 |
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
168,045 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
42,777 |
|
|
|
(7,574 |
) |
|
|
40,312 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
8,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,483 |
|
|
|
17,227 |
|
|
|
(29,389 |
) |
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003 |
|
|
|
228,347 |
|
|
|
(37,261 |
) |
|
|
234,961 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
49,846 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
(11,262 |
) |
|
|
335,799 |
|
|
|
(44,701 |
) |
|
|
330,297 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
49,846 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
(11,262 |
) |
|
|
146,634 |
|
|
|
(44,701 |
) |
|
|
141,132 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,799 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,429 |
|
|
|
(6,312 |
) |
|
|
108,117 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,334 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
Gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
23,775 |
|
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
49,770 |
|
|
|
4,219 |
|
|
|
(13,307 |
) |
|
|
388,419 |
|
|
|
(52,171 |
) |
|
|
376,930 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,357 |
|
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
120,598 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,296 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
34,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,653 |
|
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
|
|
155,317 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
26,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,840 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,854 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
25,877 |
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
27,825 |
|
Communications |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(12,683 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
52,267 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
39,168 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
333,262 |
|
|
|
(3,600 |
) |
|
|
330,338 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings (losses) of
subsidiaries |
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
(13,475 |
) |
|
|
55,157 |
|
|
|
(48,571 |
) |
|
|
46,592 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,721 |
) |
|
|
(6,944 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(12,581 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
50,303 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
(8,754 |
) |
|
|
62,101 |
|
|
|
(48,658 |
) |
|
|
59,173 |
|
Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
(41,324 |
) |
|
|
(35,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
59,173 |
|
|
|
(37,143 |
) |
|
|
(44,319 |
) |
|
|
62,101 |
|
|
|
19,361 |
|
|
|
59,173 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
24,250 |
|
|
$ |
(72,066 |
) |
|
$ |
(79,242 |
) |
|
$ |
27,178 |
|
|
$ |
124,130 |
|
|
$ |
24,250 |
|
|
80
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
73,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(73,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
783,546 |
|
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
|
$ |
784,012 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
91 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
|
5,514 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
21,474 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
141,363 |
|
|
|
(14,031 |
) |
|
|
149,301 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
100,951 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
951,835 |
|
|
|
(95,830 |
) |
|
|
960,238 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,235 |
|
|
|
(2,744 |
) |
|
|
276,491 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
42,604 |
|
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
|
|
37,334 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
25,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,356 |
|
|
|
39,162 |
|
|
|
(14,601 |
) |
|
|
90,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,383 |
|
|
|
361,001 |
|
|
|
(22,739 |
) |
|
|
404,692 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
74,904 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(37,741 |
) |
|
|
590,834 |
|
|
|
(73,091 |
) |
|
|
555,546 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
74,904 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(37,741 |
) |
|
|
(131,139 |
) |
|
|
(73,091 |
) |
|
|
(166,427 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,204 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,304 |
|
|
|
(2,334 |
) |
|
|
200,970 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,851 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,662 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,266 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
|
|
(3,499 |
) |
|
|
21,726 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
26,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,537 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
(41,240 |
) |
|
|
432,981 |
|
|
|
(76,545 |
) |
|
|
394,143 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
11,712 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,402 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,497 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,465 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
49,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,306 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,260 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
6,991 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
47,679 |
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
51,949 |
|
Communications |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
23,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,213 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,856 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(23,455 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
97,677 |
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
73,202 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
633,312 |
|
|
|
(3,505 |
) |
|
|
634,842 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
71,532 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
(41,215 |
) |
|
|
(200,331 |
) |
|
|
(73,040 |
) |
|
|
(240,699 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(20,914 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(21,540 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
72,758 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
(41,571 |
) |
|
|
(179,417 |
) |
|
|
(73,255 |
) |
|
|
(219,159 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(291,917 |
) |
|
|
(411,819 |
) |
|
|
(379,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(219,159 |
) |
|
|
(409,493 |
) |
|
|
(420,961 |
) |
|
|
(179,417 |
) |
|
|
1,009,871 |
|
|
|
(219,159 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(426,038 |
) |
|
$ |
(437,506 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,962 |
) |
|
$ |
1,059,506 |
|
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
81
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
89,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
12,773 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
58,592 |
|
|
$ |
964,185 |
|
|
|
(71,737 |
) |
|
$ |
964,032 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
11,262 |
|
|
|
(2,215 |
) |
|
|
10,204 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
16,076 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
173,735 |
|
|
|
(14,031 |
) |
|
|
176,859 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
119,306 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
59,234 |
|
|
|
1,175,187 |
|
|
|
(177,883 |
) |
|
|
1,177,100 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,384 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
362,985 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,373 |
|
|
|
106,262 |
|
|
|
(22,653 |
) |
|
|
100,591 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
16,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,035 |
|
|
|
29,395 |
|
|
|
(65,529 |
) |
|
|
47,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,408 |
|
|
|
499,041 |
|
|
|
(88,581 |
) |
|
|
511,044 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
100,130 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
(22,174 |
) |
|
|
676,146 |
|
|
|
(89,302 |
) |
|
|
666,056 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,401 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
100,090 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
(22,174 |
) |
|
|
325,785 |
|
|
|
(89,302 |
) |
|
|
315,655 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,886 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,469 |
|
|
|
(7,122 |
) |
|
|
211,347 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,562 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,878 |
|
Gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,174 |
|
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
(2,041 |
) |
|
|
53,594 |
|
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
56,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
99,979 |
|
|
|
8,410 |
|
|
|
(24,215 |
) |
|
|
830,348 |
|
|
|
(98,318 |
) |
|
|
816,204 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
11,993 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,834 |
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
242,015 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,377 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
69,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,916 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,211 |
|
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
|
|
311,285 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
53,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,708 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,007 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
7,445 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
52,236 |
|
|
|
(2,682 |
) |
|
|
57,184 |
|
Communications |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
25,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,563 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,494 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(26,740 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
95,998 |
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
68,346 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
658,327 |
|
|
|
(5,595 |
) |
|
|
653,633 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings (losses) of
subsidiaries |
|
|
99,466 |
|
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
(24,536 |
) |
|
|
172,021 |
|
|
|
(92,723 |
) |
|
|
162,571 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,372 |
) |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
4,159 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
98,801 |
|
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
(16,164 |
) |
|
|
160,534 |
|
|
|
(93,102 |
) |
|
|
158,412 |
|
Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
59,611 |
|
|
|
(47,717 |
) |
|
|
(40,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
158,412 |
|
|
|
(39,374 |
) |
|
|
(56,352 |
) |
|
|
160,534 |
|
|
|
(64,808 |
) |
|
|
158,412 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
$ |
(70,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,224 |
) |
|
$ |
129,662 |
|
|
$ |
27,808 |
|
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
82
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(426,038 |
) |
|
$ |
(437,506 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,962 |
) |
|
$ |
1,059,506 |
|
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
308,462 |
|
|
|
428,364 |
|
|
|
395,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,132,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
32,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,603 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
Net (gain) loss on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,851 |
) |
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,472 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,488 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,831 |
|
(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(8,359 |
) |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(6,380 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(74,105 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(73,983 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(685,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(685,500 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,814 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,875 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911,066 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
20,677 |
|
|
|
(1,928 |
) |
|
|
19,553 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
70,652 |
|
|
|
(45,612 |
) |
|
|
36,984 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,228 |
) |
|
|
(27,216 |
) |
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
(30,133 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20,375 |
) |
|
|
35,754 |
|
|
|
45,938 |
|
|
|
61,055 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
315,666 |
|
|
|
432,695 |
|
|
|
376,160 |
|
|
|
682,231 |
|
|
|
(1,133,090 |
) |
|
|
673,662 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
79,962 |
|
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
(61,346 |
) |
|
|
486,269 |
|
|
|
(73,584 |
) |
|
|
437,958 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
77,965 |
|
|
|
(6,571 |
) |
|
|
449,938 |
|
|
|
(157,090 |
) |
|
|
(521,235 |
) |
|
|
(156,993 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(249,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,713,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,962,978 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(25,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,328 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,243 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
837,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846,944 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,988 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for- sale |
|
|
175,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,571,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,747,567 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,425 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
773,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
684,285 |
|
|
|
(796,000 |
) |
|
|
670,771 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,468 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,260 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(665,000 |
) |
|
|
(665,000 |
) |
|
|
(315,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of a subsidiary |
|
|
(42,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,741 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,334 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
55,547 |
|
|
|
(671,571 |
) |
|
|
186,409 |
|
|
|
1,602,010 |
|
|
|
327,765 |
|
|
|
1,500,160 |
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,075,560 |
) |
|
|
441,838 |
|
|
|
(633,722 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and
assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(44,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(643,411 |
) |
|
|
77,952 |
|
|
|
(609,930 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(18,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(780,361 |
) |
|
|
796,000 |
|
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(797,880 |
) |
|
|
(6,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(804,072 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,031 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,625 |
) |
|
|
73,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
|
(1,645,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(134,170 |
) |
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
(132,349 |
) |
|
|
(2,204,149 |
) |
|
|
(255,585 |
) |
|
|
(2,061,253 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(7,286 |
) |
|
|
(115,870 |
) |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(123,135 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7,668 |
|
|
|
777,994 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
662,124 |
|
|
$ |
(2,170 |
) |
|
$ |
661,852 |
|
|
84
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
$ |
(70,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,224 |
) |
|
$ |
129,662 |
|
|
$ |
27,808 |
|
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(28,739 |
) |
|
|
78,589 |
|
|
|
71,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
36,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,318 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,862 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,122 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,703 |
) |
Losses from changes in fair value related to instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,111 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,292 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,951 |
|
Losses (earnings) from investments under the equity method |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(7,154 |
) |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,372 |
) |
|
|
(90,533 |
) |
|
|
15,239 |
|
|
|
(83,836 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,509,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,509,819 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,053 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,208 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731,885 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
732,067 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(7,566 |
) |
|
|
42,349 |
|
|
|
6,625 |
|
|
|
42,301 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
(12,149 |
) |
|
|
(260,052 |
) |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
(264,170 |
) |
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,686 |
) |
|
|
(37,608 |
) |
|
|
(6,625 |
) |
|
|
(53,440 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
14,972 |
|
|
|
(22,046 |
) |
|
|
(15,361 |
) |
|
|
(24,429 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(27,658 |
) |
|
|
75,290 |
|
|
|
51,302 |
|
|
|
36,816 |
|
|
|
(121,331 |
) |
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
99,882 |
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
(35,922 |
) |
|
|
166,478 |
|
|
|
(93,523 |
) |
|
|
141,959 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments |
|
|
(388,800 |
) |
|
|
(38,400 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
185,416 |
|
|
|
350,756 |
|
|
|
108,916 |
|
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427,660 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(497,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,133,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,631,141 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,775 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,851,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,851,899 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
669,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,215,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,884,838 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,628 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-
sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406,504 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,330 |
|
Net (disbursements) repayments on loans |
|
|
(14,020 |
) |
|
|
25,150 |
|
|
|
1,207,321 |
|
|
|
(515,568 |
) |
|
|
(1,299,431 |
) |
|
|
(596,548 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,715,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,715,330 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,028 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,684 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(233,200 |
) |
|
|
(5,135 |
) |
|
|
1,207,265 |
|
|
|
2,279,298 |
|
|
|
(947,163 |
) |
|
|
2,301,065 |
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,160,743 |
) |
|
|
(37,769 |
) |
|
|
(1,198,512 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,608 |
|
|
|
(440,896 |
) |
|
|
(312,300 |
) |
|
|
(698,588 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(165,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(676,581 |
) |
|
|
75,380 |
|
|
|
601,432 |
|
|
|
(164,769 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(549,745 |
) |
|
|
(1,393,747 |
) |
|
|
699,818 |
|
|
|
(1,243,674 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,621 |
|
|
|
624,367 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
630,186 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,900 |
) |
|
|
89,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(98,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,685 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
10,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,120 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
386,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
390,050 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
132,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,164,097 |
) |
|
|
(2,384,338 |
) |
|
|
1,041,374 |
|
|
|
(2,374,230 |
) |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
7,246 |
|
|
|
61,438 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
68,794 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
818,455 |
|
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
818,825 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end or period |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
7,646 |
|
|
$ |
879,893 |
|
|
$ |
(1,109 |
) |
|
$ |
887,619 |
|
|
86
Note 27 Exchange Offer
On June 29, 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue up to 390 million shares of its
common stock in exchange for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for the
trust preferred securities referred to in the prospectus for the exchange offer referred to below
(the Exchange Offer). In connection with the Exchange Offer, for each share of Series A preferred
stock, share of Series B preferred stock or trust preferred security accepted in accordance with
the terms of the Exchange Offer, the Corporation is offering to issue a number of shares of its
common stock equal to the Exchange Value, set forth in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer,
divided by the Relevant Price. The Relevant Price will be equal to the greater of (1) the
average Volume Weighted Average Price, or VWAP, of a share of the Corporations common stock
during the five-trading day period ending on the second business day immediately preceding the
expiration date of the Exchange Offer (which we currently expect to
be August 18, 2009, unless the
Exchange Offer is extended), determined as described in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer or
(2) the Minimum Share Price of $2.50 per share of the Corporations common stock. The expiration
date for the Exchange Offer is August 20, 2009, unless the Corporation extends the Exchange Offer
or terminates it early.
In connection with the Exchange Offer, at the Corporations request, the U.S. Treasury has agreed
to exchange all $935 million of its outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock of the
Corporation for $935 million of New Trust Preferred Securities. The New Trust Preferred Securities
will have a distribution rate of 5% until December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter (which is the same as
the dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock). The sole asset and only source of funds to
make payments on the New Trust Preferred Securities will be perpetual junior subordinated
indebtedness issued by the Corporation to the new trust. The Corporation expects to complete the
exchange with the U.S. Treasury promptly following the completion of the Exchange Offer. The
Corporations agreement with the U.S. Treasury to exchange the Series C Preferred Stock into newly
issued trust preferred securities is subject to certain closing conditions, including the
completion of the Exchange Offer and related transactions causing the increase in the Corporations
Tier 1 common equity described in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer and the completion of
definitive documentation acceptable to the U.S. Treasury.
For further discussion of these and other matters related to the Corporation, its capital needs and
the Exchange Offer, refer to the registration statement (including the prospectus and related
Exchange Offer materials) the Corporation has filed with the SEC related to the Exchange Offer.
87
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report includes managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the consolidated financial
position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Corporation or
Popular). All accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this
report should be considered an integral part of this analysis.
OVERVIEW
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation is a financial services provider with operations in Puerto Rico, the United
States, the Caribbean and Latin America. As the leading financial institution in Puerto Rico, the
Corporation offers retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary,
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans,
investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the
United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its
wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing a broad range of financial
services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates branches in New York, California,
Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of
BPNA and offers loan customers the option of being referred to a trusted consumer lending partner.
The Corporation, through its subsidiary EVERTEC, provides transaction processing services
throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, as well as internally servicing many of its
subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing businesses. Note 25 to the
consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporations business segments.
The operations of PFH, the Corporations consumer and mortgage lending subsidiary in the U.S.
mainland, were discontinued in the later part of 2008. Refer to Note 3 and the Discontinued
Operations section of this MD&A for additional information.
The Corporation reported a net loss of $183.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared
with net income of $24.3 million in the same quarter of 2008. For the six months ended June 30,
2009, the Corporations net loss totaled $235.7 million, compared to net income of $127.5 million
for the same period in 2008. Table A provides selected financial data and performance indicators
for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. As indicated in previous fillings
with the SEC, in 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of its U.S. mainland-based
subsidiary Popular Financial Holdings (PFH), and thus, the results of PFH are presented as part
of Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax in Table A. The Corporation
retrospectively adjusted certain information, principally that impacting the statement of
operations, to present in a separate line item the results from discontinued operations from prior
periods presented in this Form 10-Q for comparability purposes. The discussions in this MD&A
pertain to Popular, Inc.s continuing operations, unless otherwise indicated.
The Corporations continuing operations reported a net loss of $176.6 million for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, compared with a net income of $59.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporations net loss from continuing operations totaled
$219.2 million, compared to net income of $158.4 million for the same period in 2008.
Increased credit losses from the weakening economy have negatively affected the capital and
earnings of Popular. Like many financial institutions, Popular has experienced significant declines
in the value of collateral for real estate loans and heightened credit losses, which have resulted
in record levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and foreclosures.
The principal items impacting the continuing operations financial results for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
The main factor driving the Corporations net losses in the first two quarters of 2009 has
been the increasing credit costs from several segments of the loan portfolio. Persistent
adverse changes in the economy and negative trends in employment levels and property values in
the markets in which the Corporation operates have continued to negatively affect the
Corporations provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2009. The |
88
|
|
provision for loan losses totaled $349.4 million or 134% of net charge-offs for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, compared with $189.2 million or 167% of net charge-offs for the second
quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, compared to the same quarter in 2008, was the result of higher general reserve
requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional
residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded
for loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan. The allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio was 4.66% at June 30, 2009,
compared to 3.43% at December 31, 2008 and 2.47% at June 30, 2008. |
|
|
A decrease in net interest income of $47.2 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared
with the same quarter in 2008, was primarily due to lower average balances of interest-earning
assets, principally loans. The Corporations borrowings also decreased, driven by the
reduction in earning assets they fund. Contributing to the reduction in net interest income
was the decrease by the Federal Reserve (Fed) of the federal funds target rate from 2.00% in
June 30, 2008 to between 0% and 0.25% at June 30, 2009. This reduction in short-term market
rates impacted the yield of several of the Corporations earning assets during that period,
including the yield on commercial and construction loans with floating or adjustable rates and
floating rate collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as the yield of newly originated
loans in a declining interest rate environment. On the positive side, the decrease in rates
contributed to the decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and short-term
borrowings. Other factors impacting negatively the Corporations net interest income for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, when compared with the same quarter in 2008, were the increase in
non-performing loans with their related reversal of interest, and the exiting of several loan
origination activities in the U.S. mainland operations. |
|
|
The decrease in non-interest income from continuing operations for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 of $10.0 million, compared with the same quarter in 2008, was principally due to
losses on the sale and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, lower investment banking
fees, and higher losses on derivative instruments, among other factors. These unfavorable
variances were partially offset by higher net gains on the sale and valuation adjustments of
investment securities of $25.4 million. |
|
|
Operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 remained at levels close to those
recognized during the same quarter of the previous year. Increases in FDIC deposit insurance
premiums were partially offset by lower personnel costs and business promotion expenses that
resulted from the downsizing of the U.S. mainland operations and cost control initiatives,
among the principal reasons. |
|
|
Income tax expense of $5.4 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared to income tax
benefit of $12.6 million in the second quarter of 2008. The variance was primarily due to the
fact that in the second quarter of 2008 the Corporation was recording a tax benefit on the
Corporations U.S. mainland operations. Commencing in the second half of 2008, the Corporation
began to record a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of the Corporations U.S.
mainland operations, thus there were no tax benefits recognized in 2009 in the U.S.
operations. |
The discontinued operations of PFH in the U.S. mainland reported a net loss of $6.6 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to a net loss of $34.9 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2008. Refer to the Discontinued Operations section of this MD&A for further information.
89
TABLE A
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition Highlights |
|
At June 30, |
|
Average for the six months** |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
951,647 |
|
|
$ |
897,796 |
|
|
$ |
53,851 |
|
|
$ |
1,325,160 |
|
|
$ |
677,101 |
|
|
$ |
648,059 |
|
Investment and trading securities |
|
|
8,268,625 |
|
|
|
8,675,029 |
|
|
|
(406,404 |
) |
|
|
8,324,541 |
|
|
|
9,050,373 |
|
|
|
(725,832 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
24,848,909 |
* |
|
|
27,631,678 |
|
|
|
(2,782,769 |
) |
|
|
25,432,055 |
|
|
|
26,549,687 |
|
|
|
(1,117,632 |
) |
Total earning assets |
|
|
34,069,181 |
* |
|
|
37,204,503 |
|
|
|
(3,135,322 |
) |
|
|
35,081,756 |
|
|
|
36,277,161 |
|
|
|
(1,195,405 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
36,498,792 |
|
|
|
41,678,594 |
|
|
|
(5,179,802 |
) |
|
|
37,738,595 |
|
|
|
41,774,824 |
|
|
|
(4,036,229 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
26,913,485 |
|
|
|
27,115,728 |
|
|
|
(202,243 |
) |
|
|
27,204,865 |
|
|
|
27,275,700 |
|
|
|
(70,835 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
5,587,225 |
|
|
|
10,000,259 |
|
|
|
(4,413,034 |
) |
|
|
6,357,331 |
|
|
|
7,720,864 |
|
|
|
(1,363,533 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,899,701 |
|
|
|
3,705,994 |
|
|
|
(806,293 |
) |
|
|
3,057,332 |
|
|
|
3,425,003 |
|
|
|
(367,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Highlights |
|
Second Quarter |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
283,060 |
|
|
$ |
330,297 |
|
|
$ |
(47,237 |
) |
|
$ |
555,546 |
|
|
$ |
666,056 |
|
|
$ |
(110,510 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
|
160,279 |
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
350,401 |
|
|
|
371,572 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
225,839 |
|
|
|
235,798 |
|
|
|
(9,959 |
) |
|
|
560,570 |
|
|
|
500,549 |
|
|
|
60,021 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
330,645 |
|
|
|
330,338 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
634,842 |
|
|
|
653,633 |
|
|
|
(18,791 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
income tax |
|
|
(171,190 |
) |
|
|
46,592 |
|
|
|
(217,782 |
) |
|
|
(240,699 |
) |
|
|
162,571 |
|
|
|
(403,270 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
(12,581 |
) |
|
|
17,974 |
|
|
|
(21,540 |
) |
|
|
4,159 |
|
|
|
(25,699 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(176,583 |
) |
|
|
59,173 |
|
|
|
(235,756 |
) |
|
|
(219,159 |
) |
|
|
158,412 |
|
|
|
(377,571 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
|
|
28,324 |
|
|
|
(16,545 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
14,327 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(183,182 |
) |
|
$ |
24,250 |
|
|
$ |
(207,432 |
) |
|
$ |
(235,704 |
) |
|
$ |
127,540 |
|
|
$ |
(363,244 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
(207,810 |
) |
|
$ |
18,247 |
|
|
$ |
(226,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(285,010 |
) |
|
$ |
118,559 |
|
|
$ |
(403,569 |
) |
|
(Losses) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (losses) earnings from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.90 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.47 |
) |
Basic and diluted losses from discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Basic and diluted (losses) earnings Total |
|
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.80 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statistical Information |
|
Second Quarter |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Common Stock Data Market price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
13.06 |
|
|
$ |
5.52 |
|
|
$ |
14.07 |
|
Low |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
End |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
Book value per share at period end |
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
11.10 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
11.10 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
Profitability Ratios Return on assets |
|
|
(1.98 |
%) |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
(1.26 |
%) |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
Return on common equity |
|
|
(53.48 |
) |
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
(35.08 |
) |
|
|
7.11 |
|
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
Capitalization Ratios Average equity to assets |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
8.61 |
% |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
8.20 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk adjusted assets |
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
Total capital to risk adjusted assets |
|
|
12.02 |
|
|
|
11.77 |
|
|
|
12.02 |
|
|
|
11.77 |
|
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
8.52 |
|
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
8.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes assets from discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 as follows: $1 million in loans
and earning assets. These are included as part of Assets from discontinued operations in the
consolidated statement of condition as of such date. |
|
** |
|
Excludes averages of assets / liabilities from discontinued operations. Averages for June 30,
2008 were retrospectively adjusted to conform to the June 30, 2009 presentation. |
Total assets amounted to $36.5 billion as of June 30, 2009, compared with $38.9 billion as of
December 31, 2008 and $41.7 billion as of June 30, 2008. The decline in total assets, when compared
to December 31, 2008, was principally in loans held-in-portfolio by $1.1 billion. The current
financial environment has required the Corporation to strengthen its underwriting standards and
ensure that it prices the loans appropriately. As a result of this challenging financial
environment, together with caution being exercised by customers, and managements decision to exit
selected businesses on the United States mainland, the Corporation has seen a reduction in the
volume of loans. Total assets and loans shown in Table A for the period ended June 30, 2008 include
$2.0 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, pertaining to the operations of PFH.
Refer to Table I in the Financial Condition section of this MD&A for the percentage allocation of
the composition of the Corporations financing to total assets. The reduction in borrowings from
December 31, 2008 was principally in repurchase agreements and unsecured senior debt. The
Corporation continues to rely in the same funding sources as
those described in the 2008 Annual Report. Refer to the Liquidity Risk section of this MD&A for
funding sources and an update on the Corporations credit ratings by the major rating agencies.
90
Regulatory capital requirements for banking institutions are based on Tier 1 and Total capital,
which include both common stock and certain qualifying preferred stock, and trust preferred
securities. Nonetheless, as overall economic conditions in general and credit quality in particular
have continued to worsen, there has been an increasing regulatory and market focus on Tier 1 common
equity and Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio of banking institutions.
As part of the U.S. Governments Financial Stability Plan, on February 25, 2009, the U.S. Treasury
announced preliminary details of its Capital Assistance Program, or the CAP. To implement the
CAP, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve), the Federal
Reserve Banks, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency commenced a review,
referred to as the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (the SCAP), of the capital of the 19
largest U.S. banking institutions. Popular was not included in the group of 19 banking institutions
reviewed under the SCAP. On May 7, 2009, Federal banking regulators announced the results of the
SCAP and determined that 10 of the 19 banking institutions were required to raise additional
capital and to submit a capital plan to their Federal banking regulators by June 8, 2009 for their
review.
Even though the Corporation was not one of the banking institutions included in the SCAP,
management has closely assessed the announced SCAP results, particularly noting that (1) the SCAP
credit loss assumptions applied to regional banking institutions included in the SCAP are based on
a more adverse economic and credit scenario and (2) Federal banking regulators are focused on the
composition of regulatory capital. Specifically, the regulators have indicated that voting common
equity should be the dominant element of Tier 1 capital and have established a 4% Tier 1
common/risk-weighted assets ratio as a threshold for determining capital needs. While the SCAP
results are not applicable to the Corporation, they do express general regulatory expectations.
Although the Corporation is well-capitalized based on a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets of 10.73% as of June 30, 2009, management believes that an improvement in the composition of
the Corporations regulatory capital, including Tier 1 common equity, will better position the
Corporation in a more adverse economic and credit scenario. As a result, the Corporation is
conducting the Exchange Offer described in the Exchange Offer and Dividends on Preferred Stock and
Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities section of this MD&A and Note 27 to the consolidated
financial statements. The Exchange Offer was originally structured to increase the Corporations
Tier 1 common equity by up to approximately $1.1 billion based on the High Participation Scenario
(as described in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer). Recent losses have continued to reduce
the Corporations Tier 1 common equity. The Corporations Tier 1 common/risk-weighted assets ratio
was 2.45% as of June 30, 2009. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure section in this
MD&A for a reconciliation of Tier 1 common to common stockholders equity and a discussion of our
use of this non-GAAP financial measure in this report.
The Corporation, like other financial institutions, is subject to a number of risks, many of which
are outside of managements control, though efforts are made to manage those risks while optimizing
returns. Among the risks assumed are: (1) market risk, which is the risk that changes in market
rates and prices will adversely affect the Corporations financial condition or results of
operations; (2) liquidity risk, which is the risk that the Corporation will have insufficient cash
or access to cash to meet operating needs and financial obligations; (3) credit risk, which is the
risk that loan customers or other counterparties will be unable to perform their contractual
obligations; and (4) operational risk, which is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or
failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. In addition, the
Corporation is subject to legal, compliance and reputational risks, among others.
As a financial services company, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by general
business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are
influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and savings,
capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and
prevailing market rates on competing products. The Corporation continuously monitors general
business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest
rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems
efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.
The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes
in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other
financial institutions could adversely affect its profitability.
91
The description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information
about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporations control that,
in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, including
Item 1A of Part II, readers
should consider.
Further discussion of operating results, financial condition and credit, market and liquidity risks
is presented in the narrative and tables included herein.
The shares of the Corporations common and preferred stock are traded on the National Association
of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) system under the symbols BPOP, BPOPO and
BPOPP.
The information included in this report may contain certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on
managements current expectations and involve certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Various factors,
some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of declining growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general
business and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities. |
For a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is
subject, see the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
well as its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Other than to the extent
required by applicable law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, the
Corporation assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences
or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
SFAS No. 141-R Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business Combinations (a
revision of SFAS No. 141) (SFAS No. 141(R))
SFAS No. 141(R), issued in December 2007, establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. The Corporation is required to apply
SFAS No. 141(R) to all business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. For business
combinations in which the acquisition date was before the effective date, the provisions of SFAS
No. 141(R) will apply to the subsequent accounting for deferred income tax valuation allowances and
income tax contingencies and will require any changes in those amounts to be recorded in earnings.
SFAS No. 141(R) has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the
Corporation as of June 30, 2009.
92
SFAS No. 160 Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, which amends ARB No. 51, to establish accounting
and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 requires entities to classify noncontrolling interests as a component
of stockholders equity on the consolidated financial statements and requires subsequent changes in
ownership interests in a subsidiary to be accounted for as an equity transaction. Additionally,
SFAS No. 160 requires entities to recognize a gain or loss upon the loss of control of a subsidiary
and to remeasure any ownership interest retained at fair value on that date. This statement also
requires expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 was adopted by the Corporation
on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, an amendment of SFAS No. 133. The standard requires
enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133 and related interpretations. The standard expands the disclosure requirements for
derivatives and hedged items and has no impact on how the Corporation accounts for these
instruments. The standard was adopted by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2009. Refer to
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165)
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS. No. 165, which establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this standard sets forth the period after
the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective
for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. The Corporation evaluated subsequent events through August 10, 2009. Refer to
Exchange Offer and Dividends on Preferred Stock and Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities
section of this MD&A and Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for subsequent event
disclosures.
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No.
140 (SFAS No. 166)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, a revision of SFAS No. 140, which requires more
information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where
entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPEs), changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. It also requires a
transferor to evaluate all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated in
accordance with SFAS No. 167 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement must be
applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Corporation
is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption to its consolidated financial
statements; however, it is not expected that it will have a material impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167)
SFAS No. 167, issued in June 2009, amends the consolidating guidance applicable to variable
interest entities and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another
entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting
entitys ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the
other entitys economic performance. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all
entities currently within the scope of FIN 46(R), as well as qualifying special-purpose entities
(QSPEs) that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN 46(R). SFAS No. 167 will require a
reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity
will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the
reporting entitys financial
93
statements. SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of the
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Corporation is
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption to its consolidated financial statements;
however, it is not expected that it will have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168)
The FASB has issued SFAS No. 168 in June 2009. This statement establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 and the Codification are
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become non-authoritative. The Corporation will begin to use the new guidelines
and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of
2009. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any
impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Staff Position FAS 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase
Financing Transactions(FSP FAS 140-3)
FSP FAS 140-3, issued by the FASB in February 2008, provides implementation guidance on whether the
security transfer and contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial
asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions. FSP FAS
140-3 requires the recognition of the transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked
transaction, unless all of the following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the
repurchase financing are not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor
has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreements price is fixed and not at fair
value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and
repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing
is before the maturity of the financial asset. The scope of this FSP is limited to transfers and
subsequent repurchase financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one
another. The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 140-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-3
did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for 2009.
FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets(FSP FAS
142-3)
FSP FAS 142-3, issued by the FASB in April 2008, amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In developing
these assumptions, an entity should consider its own historical experience in renewing or extending
similar arrangements adjusted for entity specific factors or, in the absence of that experience,
the assumptions that market participants would use about renewals or extensions adjusted for the
entity specific factors. FSP FAS 142-3 shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material
impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for the quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2009.
EITF 08-6 Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations(EITF 08-6)
EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving
equity method investments. This EITF applies to all investments accounted for under the equity
method. EITF 08-6 provides guidance on the following: (1) how the initial carrying value of an
equity method investment should be determined; (2) how an impairment assessment of an underlying
indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed; (3) how an
equity method investees issuance of shares should be accounted for, and (4) how to account for a
change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. The adoption of EITF 08-6 in
January 2009 did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
94
FASB Staff Position FSP FAS 132(R)-1 Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets(FSP FAS 132(R)-1)
FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures in the financial statements of employers who are
subject to the disclosure requirements of FAS 132(R) as follows: (a) the investment allocation
decision making process, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment
policies and strategies; (b) the fair value of each major category of plan assets, disclosed
separately for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; (c) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, including the level within the fair value
hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; and (d) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additional detailed information is required for each
category above. Upon initial application, the provisions of this FSP are not required for earlier
periods that are presented for comparative periods. The Corporation will apply the new disclosure
requirements commencing with the December 31, 2009 annual financial statements. This FSP impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations.
FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments(FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, which is intended to provide greater
clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment
event. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt
securities. The new guidance improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairment on investment securities and changes the calculation of the other-than-temporary
impairment recognized in earnings in the financial statements. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 does not
amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of
equity securities.
For debt securities, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 requires an entity to assess whether (a) it has
the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to
sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an
other-than-temporary impairment on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined by FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and
the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is
not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the
anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any
current-period credit loss), FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 change the presentation and amount of the
other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the statement of operations. In these instances, the
impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and
(b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of
operations. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive loss. Previously, in all cases, if an impairment was determined to be
other-than-temporary, an impairment loss was recognized in earnings in an amount equal to the
entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance
sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment was made.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective and is to be applied prospectively for financial
statements issued for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. When
adopting FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, an entity is required to record a cumulative-effect
adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a
previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other
comprehensive loss if the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely
than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of
its amortized cost basis.
The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 for interim and annual reporting periods
commencing with the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 in the
second quarter of 2009 did not have a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the
period of adoption (April 1, 2009) since there were no previously recognized other-than-temporary
impairments related to outstanding debt securities. Also, the FSP did not have an impact on the
Corporations results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 since the
95
unrealized losses
in the Corporations investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity were considered
temporary based on managements assessments. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for additional disclosures.
FASB Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments(FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 to require providing disclosures on a
quarterly basis about the fair value of financial instruments that are not currently reflected on
the statement of condition at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair value for these assets
and liabilities was only required for year-end disclosures. The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1 effective with the financial statement disclosures for the quarter ended June 30,
2009. This FSP only impacts disclosure requirements and therefore did not have an impact on the
Corporations financial condition or results of operations. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated
financial statements for required disclosures.
FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not
Orderly(FSP FAS 157-4)
FSP FAS 157-4, issued in April 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on
identifying circumstances that indicate that a transaction is not orderly. It reaffirms the need to
use judgment to ascertain if an active market has become inactive and in determining fair values
when markets have become inactive. Additionally, it also emphasizes that even if there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless
of the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair
value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market
participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 shall be
applied prospectively and retrospective application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4
did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporations accounting policies,
by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Corporations Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical
accounting policies those related to Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments, Loans and
Allowance for Loan Losses, Income Taxes, Goodwill and Trademark and Pension and Postretirement
Benefit Obligations. For a summary of the Corporations critical accounting policies and estimates,
refer to that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.s 2008 Financial Review and
Supplementary Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the 2008 Annual Report). Also, refer to
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report for a summary of
the Corporations significant accounting policies.
Refer to the Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards section in this MD&A for a description of two newly adopted accounting standards which
impact the fair value measurement of financial instruments, including recognition accounting in
the statement of operations. These standards included (a) FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments and (b) FASB Staff
Position FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset
or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not Orderly. As
previously indicated, the adoption of these FSPs did not have a significant impact in the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
96
The Corporations assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with
regulatory guidance, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (SFAS No. 5) and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS
No. 114). Specifically pertaining to SFAS No. 5, during this quarter the Corporation enhanced its
assessment by establishing a more granular segmentation of loans with similar risk characteristics,
reducing the historical base loss periods employed, and strengthening the analysis pertaining to
the environmental factors considered. A more detailed description of the process used to estimate
the allowance for loan losses is included in the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of
this MD&A. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this
determination.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income from continuing operations, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented
with its different components on Tables B and C for the quarter and six-month periods ended June
30, 2009 as compared with the same periods in 2008, segregated by major categories of interest
earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
The interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from income
tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are investments in
obligations of the U.S. Government, some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities of the
Puerto Rico Commonwealth and its agencies, and assets held by the Corporations international
banking entities, which are tax exempt under Puerto Rico laws. To facilitate the comparison of all
interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent
basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates at each respective quarter and six-month
periods. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by
the Puerto Rico tax law.
Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized
gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the
respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the
origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to
interest yield. Interest income for quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 included a
favorable impact of $6.8 million and $12.3 million, respectively, consisting principally of the net
result of the amortization of loan origination costs and fees, amortization of net premiums on
loans purchased, and prepayment penalties and late payment charges. The favorable impact for the
quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $4.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively.
97
TABLE B
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations
Quarter ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
(1.69 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
88,341 |
|
|
|
100,137 |
|
|
|
(11,796 |
) |
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
(9,853 |
) |
|
741 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
|
(0.46 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
11,945 |
|
|
|
13,042 |
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,559 |
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
(0.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
102,667 |
|
|
|
116,655 |
|
|
|
(13,988 |
) |
|
|
(3,969 |
) |
|
|
(10,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,383 |
|
|
|
15,712 |
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
(1.10 |
) |
|
Commercial * |
|
|
189,207 |
|
|
|
235,720 |
|
|
|
(46,513 |
) |
|
|
(41,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,835 |
) |
|
746 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
8.30 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
15,486 |
|
|
|
22,379 |
|
|
|
(6,893 |
) |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(7,510 |
) |
|
4,499 |
|
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
(0.72 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
72,882 |
|
|
|
86,064 |
|
|
|
(13,182 |
) |
|
|
(8,252 |
) |
|
|
(4,930 |
) |
|
4,410 |
|
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
9.91 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
109,116 |
|
|
|
126,717 |
|
|
|
(17,601 |
) |
|
|
(6,390 |
) |
|
|
(11,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
26,546 |
|
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
386,691 |
|
|
|
470,880 |
|
|
|
(84,189 |
) |
|
|
(55,703 |
) |
|
|
(28,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,597 |
|
|
$ |
35,815 |
|
|
$ |
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
6.58 |
% |
|
|
(0.91 |
%) |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
489,358 |
|
|
$ |
587,535 |
|
|
$ |
(98,177 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,672 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,837 |
|
|
$ |
5,103 |
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
(0.70 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market** |
|
$ |
13,463 |
|
|
$ |
23,103 |
|
|
$ |
(9,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,307 |
) |
|
5,562 |
|
|
|
5,621 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
13,282 |
|
|
|
21,050 |
|
|
|
(7,768 |
) |
|
|
(7,285 |
) |
|
|
(483 |
) |
|
12,288 |
|
|
|
12,140 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
101,707 |
|
|
|
123,892 |
|
|
|
(22,185 |
) |
|
|
(25,783 |
) |
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,687 |
|
|
|
22,864 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
128,452 |
|
|
|
168,045 |
|
|
|
(39,593 |
) |
|
|
(41,401 |
) |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
|
(2,580 |
) |
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
16,631 |
|
|
|
40,312 |
|
|
|
(23,681 |
) |
|
|
(14,716 |
) |
|
|
(8,965 |
) |
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
42,903 |
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
16,299 |
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
13,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,631 |
|
|
|
30,395 |
|
|
|
(1,764 |
) |
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
Total interest bearing
liabilities |
|
|
187,986 |
|
|
|
234,961 |
|
|
|
(46,975 |
) |
|
|
(53,634 |
) |
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing
demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,597 |
|
|
$ |
35,815 |
|
|
$ |
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
(0.46 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
(0.45 |
%) |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
301,372 |
|
|
|
352,574 |
|
|
|
(51,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,038 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
(0.43 |
%) |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
18,312 |
|
|
|
22,277 |
|
|
|
(3,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
283,060 |
|
|
$ |
330,297 |
|
|
$ |
(47,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category. |
|
* |
|
Includes commercial construction loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
As shown in Table B, the decrease in net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis,
reflects a reduction in the Corporations average earning assets. Several factors contributed to
this decrease as described below:
|
|
|
The decrease in the commercial and construction loan portfolio took place mainly as a
result of lower origination activity and an increase in loan charge-offs. |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the lease portfolio is mainly the result of the Corporations decision
to exit the leasing business in the U.S. mainland operations. A substantial portion of the
lease portfolio from Popular Equipment Finance was sold during the first quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The mortgage loan portfolio has been impacted by the Corporations decision to exit
certain mortgage loan |
98
|
|
|
rigination activity, such as the non-conventional mortgages and the E-LOAN loan origination
platform in the U.S. mainland. |
|
|
|
|
The consumer loan portfolio has been impacted by: the sale of the E-LOAN auto loan
portfolio during the latter part of the second quarter of 2008, a slowdown in the auto loan
origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off of the E-LOAN home equity lines of
credit (HELOCs) and closed-end second mortgage portfolio. |
The Corporations also experienced compression in the net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent
basis. The factors that contributed to this reduction were as follows:
|
|
|
The FED lowered the federal funds target rate from 2.00% in June 30, 2008 to between 0%
and 0.25% at June 30, 2009. This reduction in market rates impacted the yield of several of
the Corporations earning assets during that period. These assets include commercial and
construction loans of which 66% have floating or adjustable rates, floating rate home
equity lines of credit and credit cards, floating rate collateralized mortgage obligations,
as well as the origination of loans in a low interest rate environment. |
|
|
|
Increase in non-performing loans and its related interest accrual reversal. This
increase impacted mainly the commercial, construction and mortgage loans portfolios. |
|
|
|
Market risk management strategies have generated a higher balance of short-term
investments at lower rates, thus pressuring the net interest income. |
The net interest income benefited from a reduction in the cost of both short-term borrowings and
interest bearing liabilities. This reduction was in part due to managements decision to reduce the
rates of certain non-maturity deposit accounts as well as maturities of high cost certificates of
deposits being renewed at lower rates.
As shown in Table C, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was also impacted by the reasons described above for the quarterly results.
99
TABLE C
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
Six-month period ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
(2.43 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
5,517 |
|
|
$ |
11,004 |
|
|
$ |
(5,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,455 |
) |
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
7,592 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
179,093 |
|
|
|
211,263 |
|
|
|
(32,170 |
) |
|
|
(6,135 |
) |
|
|
(26,035 |
) |
|
733 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
24,506 |
|
|
|
27,690 |
|
|
|
(3,184 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,650 |
|
|
|
9,727 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
209,116 |
|
|
|
249,957 |
|
|
|
(40,841 |
) |
|
|
(14,313 |
) |
|
|
(26,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
(1.43 |
) |
|
Commercial * |
|
|
385,399 |
|
|
|
498,273 |
|
|
|
(112,874 |
) |
|
|
(111,089 |
) |
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
|
844 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
8.05 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
35,377 |
|
|
|
44,900 |
|
|
|
(9,523 |
) |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
(11,334 |
) |
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
150,925 |
|
|
|
176,788 |
|
|
|
(25,863 |
) |
|
|
(14,136 |
) |
|
|
(11,727 |
) |
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
222,307 |
|
|
|
253,837 |
|
|
|
(31,530 |
) |
|
|
(11,035 |
) |
|
|
(20,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,432 |
|
|
|
26,550 |
|
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
|
|
(1.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
794,008 |
|
|
|
973,798 |
|
|
|
(179,790 |
) |
|
|
(134,449 |
) |
|
|
(45,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,082 |
|
|
$ |
36,277 |
|
|
$ |
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
(1.02 |
%) |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
1,003,124 |
|
|
$ |
1,223,755 |
|
|
$ |
(220,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(148,762 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,832 |
|
|
$ |
4,938 |
|
|
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
(0.78 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market ** |
|
$ |
29,170 |
|
|
$ |
49,155 |
|
|
$ |
(19,985 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(928 |
) |
|
5,570 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
28,250 |
|
|
|
45,234 |
|
|
|
(16,984 |
) |
|
|
(15,796 |
) |
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
12,553 |
|
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
219,071 |
|
|
|
268,596 |
|
|
|
(49,525 |
) |
|
|
(52,810 |
) |
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,955 |
|
|
|
23,123 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
276,491 |
|
|
|
362,985 |
|
|
|
(86,494 |
) |
|
|
(87,663 |
) |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
(2,760 |
) |
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
(1.03 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
37,334 |
|
|
|
100,591 |
|
|
|
(63,257 |
) |
|
|
(34,918 |
) |
|
|
(28,339 |
) |
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
90,867 |
|
|
|
47,468 |
|
|
|
43,399 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
38,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,312 |
|
|
|
30,844 |
|
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Total interest bearing
liabilities |
|
|
404,692 |
|
|
|
511,044 |
|
|
|
(106,352 |
) |
|
|
(118,083 |
) |
|
|
11,731 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing
demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,082 |
|
|
$ |
36,277 |
|
|
$ |
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
(0.50 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
(0.52 |
%) |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
598,432 |
|
|
|
712,711 |
|
|
|
(114,279 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,679 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
(0.47 |
%) |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
42,886 |
|
|
|
46,655 |
|
|
|
(3,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
555,546 |
|
|
$ |
666,056 |
|
|
$ |
(110,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category. |
|
* |
|
Includes commercial construction loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses for the continuing operations totaled $349.4 million, or 134% of
net charge-offs, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared with $189.2 million, or 167% of net
charge-offs for the second quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same quarter in 2008 was the result of higher general
reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional
residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for
loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114. Net charge-offs from the continuing operations for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009, when compared with the second quarter in 2008, increased mainly in
construction
100
loans, consumer loans
(principally U.S. mainland home equity lines of credit), commercial loans and mortgage loans.
Provision and net charge-offs information for prior periods was retrospectively adjusted to exclude
discontinued operations for comparative purposes.
The provision for loan losses for the continuing operations totaled $722.0 million, or 157% of net
charge-offs, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with $350.4 million, or 170% of net
charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Similar factors to those described for the
quarterly results primarily influenced the variance for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period in the previous year.
Information on net charge-offs, non-performing assets and the allowance for loan losses is provided
in the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Refer to Table D for a breakdown on non-interest income from continuing operations by major
categories for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
TABLE D
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
53,463 |
|
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
$ |
107,204 |
|
|
$ |
102,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,318 |
|
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
|
27,508 |
|
|
|
26,340 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
53,881 |
|
|
|
51,710 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,449 |
|
|
|
27,282 |
|
|
|
(3,833 |
) |
|
|
47,454 |
|
|
|
54,526 |
|
|
|
(7,072 |
) |
Processing fees |
|
|
13,727 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
27,135 |
|
|
|
25,543 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
24,551 |
|
|
|
25,876 |
|
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
9,694 |
|
|
|
8,079 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
17,023 |
|
|
|
19,076 |
|
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value
adjustments |
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
(3,535 |
) |
|
|
13,432 |
|
|
|
15,216 |
|
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
Trust fees |
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
6,104 |
|
|
|
6,132 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Other fees |
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
11,390 |
|
|
|
13,268 |
|
|
|
(1,878 |
) |
|
Total other service fees |
|
|
102,437 |
|
|
|
108,117 |
|
|
|
(5,680 |
) |
|
|
200,970 |
|
|
|
211,347 |
|
|
|
(10,377 |
) |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments
of investment securities |
|
|
53,705 |
|
|
|
28,334 |
|
|
|
25,371 |
|
|
|
229,851 |
|
|
|
78,562 |
|
|
|
151,289 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
16,839 |
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
23,662 |
|
|
|
31,878 |
|
|
|
(8,216 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments
on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(13,453 |
) |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
(18,360 |
) |
|
|
(27,266 |
) |
|
|
19,174 |
|
|
|
(46,440 |
) |
Other operating income |
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
(11,252 |
) |
|
|
26,149 |
|
|
|
56,702 |
|
|
|
(30,553 |
) |
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
225,839 |
|
|
$ |
235,798 |
|
|
$ |
(9,959 |
) |
|
$ |
560,570 |
|
|
$ |
500,549 |
|
|
$ |
60,021 |
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
positively impacted by higher net gains on sales of investment securities, as shown on the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Net gain on sale of
investment
securities |
|
$ |
53,705 |
|
|
$ |
28,334 |
|
|
$ |
25,371 |
|
|
$ |
236,440 |
|
|
$ |
78,562 |
|
|
$ |
157,878 |
|
Valuation
adjustments of
investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,705 |
|
|
$ |
28,334 |
|
|
$ |
25,371 |
|
|
$ |
229,851 |
|
|
$ |
78,562 |
|
|
$ |
151,289 |
|
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities for 2009 consist principally of $52.3 million in
gains from the sale of equity securities in the second quarter of 2009 by BPPR and EVERTEC
reportable segments, and $182.7 million in gains derived from the sale of $3.4 billion in U.S.
Treasury notes and U.S. agencies during the first quarter of 2009 by BPPR. These results compare to
$28.3 million in capital gains realized from the sale of $2.4 billion in U.S. agency securities
during the second quarter of 2008 and gains of approximately $49.3 million in the first quarter of
101
2008 caused by the redemption of VISA shares of common stock held by the Corporation.
The Corporation recorded $6.6 million in other-than-temporary impairments related to equity
securities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. No other-than-temporary impairments on
investment securities were recognized by the Corporations continuing operations during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
The favorable variance in gains on the sale of investment securities were offset by the following
unfavorable variances in non-interest income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
losses associated to the sales of loans in 2009, compared to gains in 2008, as detailed
in the following table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
(Loss) gain on sales of loans |
|
$ |
(13,070 |
) |
|
$ |
4,779 |
|
|
$ |
(17,849 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,558 |
) |
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
|
$ |
(42,604 |
) |
Lower of cost or market
valuation adjustment on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(3,708 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(13,453 |
) |
|
$ |
4,907 |
|
|
$ |
(18,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,266 |
) |
|
$ |
19,174 |
|
|
$ |
(46,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gains on sales of loans for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, when
compared to the same period of the previous year, was mainly the result of increases in
representation and warranty reserves for loans previously sold by E-LOAN given an upward
trend in repurchase requests and loss severities in the current economic environment. The
unfavorable variance for the quarter was also impacted by lower volume of loans sold by
E-LOAN, which stopped originating loans in the fourth quarter of 2008. In addition, the
variance for the six-month period was also influenced by the impact of the sale of
approximately $0.3 billion in lease financings by Popular Equipment Finance, a subsidiary of
BPNA, during the first quarter of 2009, which resulted in a loss in the first quarter of
2009 of approximately $13.8 million. |
|
|
|
lower other operating income during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 by
$11.3 million and $30.6 million, respectively, when compared to the same periods of the
previous year, which reflect the impact of higher derivative losses including unfavorable
credit risk adjustments, lower investment banking fees in the Corporations broker-dealer
subsidiary due to lower volume of government debt offerings underwritten, lower gains on
the sales of real estate properties in the Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, and the gain
recognized during the second quarter of 2008 on the sale of substantially all assets of
EVERTECs health processing division. Also contributing to the decrease in other operating
income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, compared with the same period of 2008,
were $12.8 million in gains on the sale of six retail bank branches of BPNA in Texas during
the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
lower total other service fees during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared with the same periods of the previous year, which are detailed in Table D. The
decline was mainly in credit card fees because of lower merchant income due to reduced
volume of purchases and lower late payment fees mainly from lower volume of accounts
subject to the fee. The unfavorable variance in mortgage servicing was due to a reduction
in the fair value of the servicing rights due to higher run-off rate of the portfolio and
higher prepayment speeds, partially offset by higher servicing fees due to the growth in
the portfolio of loans serviced for others by the continuing operations, which rose by
approximately $5.5 billion from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. Refer to Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information on mortgage servicing rights. |
|
|
|
lower trading account profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the
same period in 2008, mainly due to lower realized gains on the sale of mortgage-backed
securities. |
102
OPERATING EXPENSES
Refer to Table E for a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories for the quarter and
six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with the same periods in the previous year.
TABLE E
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
136,206 |
|
|
$ |
155,317 |
|
|
$ |
(19,111 |
) |
|
$ |
281,497 |
|
|
$ |
311,285 |
|
|
$ |
(29,788 |
) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
26,840 |
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
52,465 |
|
|
|
54,708 |
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
Equipment expenses |
|
|
25,202 |
|
|
|
28,854 |
|
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
51,306 |
|
|
|
58,007 |
|
|
|
(6,701 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
13,084 |
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
26,260 |
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
51,949 |
|
|
|
57,184 |
|
|
|
(5,235 |
) |
Communications |
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
24,213 |
|
|
|
25,563 |
|
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
Business promotion |
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
(8,158 |
) |
|
|
17,856 |
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
|
|
(16,992 |
) |
Printing and supplies |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
7,494 |
|
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
36,331 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
34,061 |
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
40,836 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
38,968 |
|
|
|
39,168 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
73,202 |
|
|
|
68,346 |
|
|
|
4,856 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
330,645 |
|
|
$ |
330,338 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
634,842 |
|
|
$ |
653,633 |
|
|
$ |
(18,791 |
) |
|
Operating expenses for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 included approximately
$2.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively, in costs associated to the restructuring plans in
place at BPNA and E-LOAN that were commenced during 2008. To facilitate the comparative analysis,
below are details on the restructuring plans that pertained to the continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
BPNA |
|
E-LOAN 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
BPNA |
|
E-LOAN 2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Plan |
|
Restructuring Plan |
|
Total |
|
Restructuring Plan |
|
Restructuring Plan |
|
Total |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
2,243 |
|
|
$ |
4,278 |
|
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
$ |
6,981 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Other operating
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
4,804 |
|
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
$ |
7,507 |
|
|
The decrease in personnel costs for the continuing operations was primarily the result of a
reduction in headcount from 10,956 FTEs as of June 30, 2008 to
9,832 FTEs as of June 30, 2009. BPNA and E-LOAN were the principal contributors to this reduction
with a decrease of 814 FTEs on a combined basis. There was also a reduction in headcount at BPPR
and EVERTEC due to cost control initiatives, which included lower headcount from attrition. Also,
there were lower incentive compensation and commissions. Furthermore, in February 2009, the
Corporation suspended its matching contributions to the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland subsidiaries
savings and investment plans as part of the actions taken to control costs, as well as froze the
BPPRs pension plan with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009.
The reduction in equipment and business promotion resulted principally from cost control measures
on expenditures in general as well as the downsizing of the Corporations U.S. mainland operations.
The increase in FDIC deposit insurance premiums includes the impact of a $16.7 million special
assessment in the second quarter of 2009. For a discussion of factors that influenced this increase
and the special assessment, refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q, particularly the risk
factor captioned Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse affect on the
Corporations earnings.
103
RESTRUCTURING PLANS (for the continuing operations)
As indicated in the 2008 Annual Report, on October 17, 2008, the Board of Directors of Popular,
Inc. approved two restructuring plans for the BPNA reportable segment. The objective of the
restructuring plans is to improve profitability in the short-term, increase liquidity and lower
credit costs and, over time, achieve a greater integration with corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
BPNA Restructuring Plan
The restructuring plan for BPNAs banking operations (the BPNA Restructuring Plan) contemplates
the following measures: closing, consolidating or selling approximately 40 underperforming branches
in all existing markets; the shutting down, sale or downsizing of lending businesses that do not
generate deposits or fee income; and the reduction of general expenses associated with functions
supporting the branch and balance sheet initiatives. The BPNA Restructuring Plan also contemplates
greater integration with the corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
As part of the BPNA Restructuring Plan, the Corporation exited certain businesses including, among
the principal ones, those related to the origination of non-conventional mortgages, equipment lease
financing, business loans to professionals, multifamily lending, mixed-used commercial loans and
credit cards. The Corporation holds the existing portfolios of the exited businesses in a run-off
mode. Also, the Corporation downsized the following businesses related to its U.S. mainland banking
operations: business banking, SBA lending, and consumer / mortgage lending.
The table previously presented in the Operating Expenses section above, details the expenses
recorded by the Corporation during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 that were
associated with this particular restructuring plan. As of June 30, 2009, the reserve for
restructuring costs associated with the BPNA Restructuring Plan amounted to $8 million. During the
second quarter of 2009, restructuring charges associated to the BPNA Restructuring Plan amounted to
$1.4 million and were principally for severance costs. As of June 30, 2009, the BPNA Restructuring
Plan has resulted in combined charges for 2008 and 2009 of approximately $24.5 million. An
additional $9.1 million in associated costs are expected to be incurred in 2009. Refer to Note 20
to the consolidated financial statements for a detail of the activity in the reserve for
restructuring costs and a breakdown of charges.
All restructuring efforts at BPNA are expected to result in approximately $50 million in recurrent
annual cost savings. The majority of the savings are related to personnel costs since the
restructuring plan incorporates a headcount reduction of approximately 640 FTEs, or 30% of BPNAs workforce. Management expects the headcount reduction to be
achieved by the third quarter of 2009. As a result of the BPNA Restructuring Plan FTEs at BPNA
were 1,611 at June 30, 2009, compared to 2,173 at the same date in the previous year.
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan
In October 2008, the Corporations Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan for E-LOAN (the
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan), which involved E-LOAN to cease operating as a direct lender, an
event that occurred in late 2008. E-LOAN continues to market deposit accounts under its name for
the benefit of BPNA and offers loan customers the option of being referred to a trusted consumer
lending partner. As part of the 2008 plan, all operational and support functions were transferred
to BPNA and EVERTEC. The 2008 E-LOAN Restructuring Plan is expected to be substantially completed
by the end of the third quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, E-LOANs workforce totaled 61 FTEs,
compared to 312 as of June 30, 2008.
As of June 30, 2009, the accrual for restructuring costs associated with the E-LOAN 2008
Restructuring Plan amounted to $2 million. Restructuring charges associated to the E-LOAN 2008
Restructuring Plan amounted to $0.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and consisted
principally of severance costs. As of June 30, 2009, the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan has
resulted in combined charges for 2008 and 2009 of approximately $24.7 million. An additional $0.2
million in associated costs are expected to be incurred in 2009. Refer to Note 20 to the
consolidated financial statements for a detail of the activity in the reserve for restructuring
costs and a breakdown of charges.
104
The costs related to the E-LOAN Restructuring Plan are part of the results of the BPNA reportable
segment.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for the continuing operations amounted to $5.4 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, compared with income tax benefit of $12.6 million for the same quarter of
2008. During the second quarter of 2009, a valuation allowance was recorded on the deferred tax
assets (DTA) of the Corporations U.S. mainland operations originated during the quarter, thus
offsetting the tax benefits derived from the operating losses. During the second quarter of 2008
the Corporation was recording a tax benefit on the Corporations U.S. mainland operations.
Also, during the second quarter 2009, there was an increase in income subject to a lower
preferential tax rate on capital gains applicable to Puerto Rico corporations as compared to the
same quarter of 2008. Offsetting that gain was a reduction in exempt interest income, net of
disallowance of expenses attributed to such exempt income, and an increase in income tax expense in
BPPR as a result of having higher capital gain income than taxable income during this quarter.
The components of the income tax expense (benefit) for the continuing operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
(70,103 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
|
$ |
(98,567 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
Benefits of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(11,094 |
) |
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
(26,856 |
) |
|
|
11.16 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(12,508 |
) |
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
(59,273 |
) |
|
|
24.63 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
84,916 |
|
|
|
(49.60 |
) |
|
|
145,229 |
|
|
|
(60.34 |
) |
Difference in tax rates due to multiple
jurisdictions |
|
|
8,218 |
|
|
|
(4.80 |
) |
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
(9.34 |
) |
State taxes and others |
|
|
5,964 |
|
|
|
(3.49 |
) |
|
|
(4,549 |
) |
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
5,393 |
|
|
|
(3.15 |
%) |
|
$ |
(21,540 |
) |
|
|
8.95 |
% |
|
Income tax benefit amounted to $21.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009,
compared with income tax expense of $4.2 million for the same period in 2008. The variance between
periods was primarily due to higher income subject to a lower preferential tax rate on capital
gains applicable to Puerto Rico corporations for 2009 as compared to 2008. Also, on March 9, 2009,
several amendments or additions to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code were adopted, including a
temporary five percent special surtax over the tax liability of all corporations doing business in
Puerto Rico for years beginning on January 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2011. This increase in tax
rate resulted in an income tax benefit as a result of adjusting the deferred tax assets to reflect
the increase in the tax rate.
These reductions were partially offset by a decrease in exempt interest income, net of disallowance
of expenses attributed to such exempt income, and by an increase in income tax expense as a result
of having higher capital gain income than taxable income.
Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporations
deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2009.
105
REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS
The Corporations reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco
Popular de Puerto Rico, EVERTEC and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain
only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. Also, a Corporate group has been defined to
support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the
Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments. For a description of the
Corporations reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying
management accounting process, refer to Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporate group had a net loss of $27.1 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with a
net loss of $9.3 million in the same quarter of 2008. The factors that mostly contributed to this
variance were higher net interest expense by approximately $9.4 million and lower income tax
benefit by $7.4 million. The variance in net interest expense was principally the result of higher
cost on senior debt due to rate increases resulting from downgrades on Populars debt ratings,
which is explained in the Liquidity section of this MD&A. The Corporate group had net losses of
$46.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with net losses of $19.1 million for
the same period in 2008. Similar factors influenced the year-to-date variances.
Highlights on the results of operations for the reportable segments are discussed below.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment reported net income of $6.8 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $85.7 million, or 93%, when compared with the same
quarter in the previous year. The Corporations banking operations in Puerto Rico have been
adversely impacted by the prolonged economic recession being experienced by the Puerto Rico
economy, principally affecting the Corporations lending areas and credit losses. The main factors
that contributed to the variance in the results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, when compared
to the second quarter of 2008, included:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $26.3 million, or 11%, primarily due to a lower net
interest yield, which was principally driven by the reduction in the yield of earning
assets, principally commercial and construction loans. This decline can be attributed to
two main factors: (1) the reduction in rates by the Fed as described in the Net Interest
Income section of this MD&A and (2) an increase in non-performing loans. Also, the BPPR
reportable segment experienced a decrease in the yield of investment securities. Partially
offsetting this unfavorable impact to net interest income was a reduction in the
Corporations average cost of funds driven by a reduction in the cost of deposits and
short-term borrowings due to the decrease in rates by the Fed and managements actions to
lower the rates paid on certain deposits. Also, the unfavorable variance in net interest
income was associated with a decline in the average volume of investment securities and in
the loan portfolio, in part due to the slowdown of loan origination activity and increased
levels of loan charge-offs. This negative impact from the reduction in the average volume
of earning assets was partially offset by a reduction in the average volume of short-term
borrowings; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $73.9 million, or 69%, primarily related to the
construction, consumer and commercial loan portfolios. The BPPR reportable segment
experienced an increase of $68.8 million in net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, compared to the same quarter in the previous year, principally associated with an
increase in construction loan net charge-offs by $48.0 million, consumer loans by $12.0
million and commercial loans by $8.2 million. As of June 30, 2009, there were $991 million
of SFAS No. 114 impaired loans in the BPPR reportable segment with a related allowance for
loan losses of $207 million, compared to $556 million and $108 million, respectively, as of
June 30, 2008. Non-performing loans in this reportable segment increased by $703 million
from June 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009, mainly related to construction loans. The
ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable
segment was 4.26% as of June 30, 2009, compared with 2.86% as of June 30, 2008. The
provision for loan losses represented 131% of net charge-offs for the second quarter of
2009, compared with 154% of net charge-offs in the same period of 2008. The annualized net
charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 3.61%
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared with 1.73% in the same quarter of the
previous year; |
106
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $0.4 million. There were higher gains on the sale of
investment securities in the second quarter of 2009 by $16.6 million, which was mostly the
net impact of the aforementioned gain on the sale of equity securities in the second
quarter of 2009, compared to the gains on the sale of U.S. agency securities in the second
quarter of 2008. These transactions were described in the Non-Interest Income section of
this MD&A. This favorable variance was partially offset by lower other service fees by
$11.3 million, principally in credit card fees, fees on the sale and administration of
investment products, and an unfavorable change in the fair value of servicing rights. Other
operating income also decreased mainly due to lower investment banking fees in the
Corporations broker-dealer subsidiary due to lower volume of government debt offerings
underwritten and lower gains on the sales of real estate properties in the Puerto Rico
banking subsidiary. As explained in Note 25 to the financial statements, management
distributes a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR between the commercial
banking and the consumer and retail banking businesses of BPPR. In the additional
disclosures of the BPPR reportable segment presented in Note 25, the results of the
consumer and retail banking business of BPPR include a $44.4 million gain on the
aforementioned sale of investment securities; |
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $2.9 million, or 1%, mainly due to higher FDIC deposit
insurance premiums, partially offset by lower personnel costs, business promotion,
professional fees and other operating taxes, among others; and |
|
|
|
lower income taxes by $17.1 million, or 88%. Refer to the Income Taxes section of this
MD&A. |
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $186.6 million, a decrease of $4.7
million, or 2%, compared with the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $54.8 million, or 11%; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $122.8 million, or 58%; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $133.5 million, or 37%, which was mainly due to higher
gains on the sale of investment securities by $157.4 million. In the additional disclosures
of the BPPR reportable segment presented in Note 25, the capital gain specifically related
to the sale of the investment securities available-for-sale in the six months ended June
30, 2009 was distributed $50.8 million to the commercial banking business and $176.4
million to the consumer and retail banking business of BPPR. The transactions that impacted
this variance were described in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A; |
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $3.3 million, or less than 1%; and |
|
|
|
income tax benefit of $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to an
income tax expense of $42.1 million for the same period in the previous year. |
EVERTEC
EVERTECs net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 totaled $18.1 million, an increase of
$4.6 million, or 34%, compared with the results of the same quarter in the previous year.
The principal factors that contributed to the variance in results for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, when compared with the second quarter of 2008, included:
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $4.6 million, or 7%, primarily due to a gain of $7.9
million on the sale of the equity securities during the second quarter of 2009 and to
higher electronic transaction processing fees mainly related to the automated teller
machine (ATM) network, point-of-sale (POS) terminals, and higher business process
outsourcing. These positive variances were partially offset by lower income derived from
Information Technology (IT) consulting services and by the impact in the second quarter
of 2008 of a gain of approximately $1.7 million related to the sale of substantially all
assets of EVERTECs health processing division in exchange for an equity participation in
the acquiring company; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $2.6 million, or 5%, primarily due to lower personnel costs;
and |
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $2.6 million, or 60%. |
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $28.0 million, an increase of $2.7
million, or 11%, compared with the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $3.6 million, or 3%; |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $8.5 million, or 9%; and |
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $2.2 million, or 22%. |
107
Banco Popular North America
Banco Popular North America reported a net loss of $174.2 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, compared to a net loss of $34.3 million for the second quarter of 2008. The main factors that
contributed to the quarterly variance in this reportable segment included:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $11.5 million, or 12%, which was mainly due to lower
interest income on loans, partially offset by a reduction in deposit expenses, including
internet deposits; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $86.4 million, principally as a result of higher
general reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S.
non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with
specific reserves recorded for loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114. There were
higher net charge-offs in construction loans by $23.4 million, commercial by $21.3 million,
consumer loans by $19.8 million and mortgage loans by $14.3 million. As of June 30, 2009,
there were $454 million of SFAS No. 114 impaired loans in the Banco Popular North America
reportable segment with a related allowance for loan losses of $106 million, compared to
$84 million and $15 million, respectively, at June 30, 2008. The increase in the provision
for loan losses considers inherent losses in the portfolios evidenced by an increase in
non-performing loans in this reportable segment by $393 million, when compared to June 30,
2008. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio for the Banco
Popular North America reportable segment was 5.32% as of June 30, 2009, compared with 1.84%
as of June 30, 2008. The provision for loan losses represented 138% of net charge-offs for
the second quarter of 2009, compared with 188% of net charge-offs in the same period of
2008. The annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the Banco
Popular North America operations was 5.14% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared
with 1.72% in the same quarter of the previous year; |
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $23.5 million, or 80%, mainly due to losses on sale of
loans and valuation adjustments of $14.0 million compared to gains of $4.5 million during
the second quarter of 2008. The losses in the second quarter of 2009 were mainly as a
result of an increase in indemnification reserves associated to loans sold; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $7.1 million, or 7%. This variance was principally the
result of lower personnel costs by $14.6 million and business promotion by $5.0 million;
partially offset by higher other operating expenses mainly due to higher FDIC deposit
insurance premiums. Refer to the Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A for details on
the costs incurred to date related to the BPNA and E-LOAN restructuring plans; and |
|
|
|
income tax expense of $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to an income
tax benefit of $24.8 million in the second quarter of 2008. An income tax benefit was
recorded for the second quarter of 2008, while no tax benefits were recognized in 2009.
Commencing in the second half of 2008, the Corporation began to record a valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets of the operations of the BPNA reportable segment. |
|
|
|
Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $387.7 million, an increase of $351.4
million, when compared with the same period in the previous year. These results reflected: |
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $30.5 million, or 16%; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $248.9 million; |
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $73.6 million, or 89%, which was mainly due to losses
in 2009 associated to loan sales and because the results for the six months ended June
30, 2008 included a $12.8 million gain on the sale of BPNAs Texas branches; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $21.3 million, or 11%, principally due to downsizing;
and |
|
|
|
lower income tax benefit by $19.8 million, or 71%. |
108
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
Total assets at June 30, 2009 amounted to $36.5 billion, compared to $38.9 billion at December 31,
2008 and $41.7 billion as of June 30, 2008. The decline in total assets from December 31, 2008 to
June 30, 2009 was principally in loans. Total assets as of June 30, 2008 included $2.0 billion
pertaining to PFH. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for the
Corporations consolidated statements of condition and to Table A for financial highlights on major
line items of the statements of condition.
A breakdown of the Corporations investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity on a
combined basis is presented in Table F. Also, Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial
statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporations available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio.
TABLE F
Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
502.1 |
|
|
$ |
(471.3 |
) |
|
$ |
460.8 |
|
|
$ |
(430.0 |
) |
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,781.4 |
|
|
|
4,808.5 |
|
|
|
(3,027.1 |
) |
|
|
4,639.8 |
|
|
|
(2,858.4 |
) |
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
382.3 |
|
|
|
385.7 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
311.0 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,673.7 |
|
|
|
1,507.0 |
|
|
|
166.7 |
|
|
|
1,398.9 |
|
|
|
274.8 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
149.0 |
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
210.0 |
|
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,542.8 |
|
|
|
848.5 |
|
|
|
2,694.3 |
|
|
|
884.0 |
|
|
|
2,658.8 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Others |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,566.5 |
|
|
$ |
8,219.2 |
|
|
$ |
(652.7 |
) |
|
$ |
7,934.8 |
|
|
$ |
(368.3 |
) |
|
The decline in the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios
from December 31, 2008 to the end of the second quarter of 2009 was mainly associated with the
repayment of maturing securities. As indicated previously, during the first quarter of 2009, the
Corporation sold $3.4 billion of investment securities available-for-sale portfolio, principally of
U.S. agency securities (FHLB notes). Funds were reinvested during 2009, primarily in GNMA and FNMA
mortgage-backed securities.
The impact of the restructuring (sale and reinvestment) of the investment securities portfolio
during 2009 was to:
|
|
|
strengthen common equity by realizing a gain that was subject to market risk, if bond
prices were to decline; |
|
|
|
increase the Corporations regulatory capital ratios; |
|
|
|
redeploy most of the proceeds in securities with a risk weighting of 0% for regulatory
capital purposes, as compared to the 20% risk-weighting which applied to the FHLB notes
sold; and |
|
|
|
mitigate the impact of the portfolios restructuring on net interest income, by
reinvesting most of the sale proceeds in a higher-yielding asset class. |
The Corporation holds investment securities primarily for liquidity, yield enhancement and interest
rate risk management. The portfolio primarily includes very liquid, high quality debt securities.
Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to consider various factors, which
include (1) duration and magnitude of the decline in value, (2) the financial condition of the
issuer or issuers, (3) structure of the security and (4) managements intent to sell the security
or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the security
before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. Additional information is provided in Notes 6 and
7 to the consolidated financial statements. Management considered the guidance of FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2, which was adopted in the second quarter of 2009, including the evaluation for
credit-related other-than-temporary impairment for debt securities. At June 30, 2009, management concluded that no material
individual securities in an unrealized loss position were other-than-temporarily impaired.
Management believes that the Corporation will fully collect the carrying value of debt securities
in unrealized loss positions at June 30, 2009. Management has no specific intent to sell any debt
securities in a loss position, and it is
not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell any
109
debt security before recovery
of its amortized cost basis.
A breakdown of the Corporations loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets, at
period-end, is presented in Table G.
TABLE G
Loans Ending Balances (including loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
13,119,330 |
|
|
$ |
13,687,060 |
|
|
$ |
(567,730 |
) |
|
$ |
13,832,738 |
|
|
$ |
(713,408 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
2,033,448 |
|
|
|
2,212,813 |
|
|
|
(179,365 |
) |
|
|
2,107,933 |
|
|
|
(74,485 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
730,396 |
|
|
|
1,080,810 |
|
|
|
(350,414 |
) |
|
|
1,116,769 |
|
|
|
(386,373 |
) |
Mortgage (1) |
|
|
4,646,521 |
|
|
|
4,639,464 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
5,609,123 |
|
|
|
(962,602 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
4,319,214 |
|
|
|
4,648,784 |
|
|
|
(329,570 |
) |
|
|
4,965,115 |
|
|
|
(645,901 |
) |
|
Total loans (2) |
|
$ |
24,848,909 |
|
|
$ |
26,268,931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,420,022 |
) |
|
$ |
27,631,678 |
|
|
$ |
(2,782,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes residential construction loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Loans disclosed as of June 30, 2008 include PFHs loan portfolios. Loans reported as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
exclude the discontinued operations of PFH. |
The decrease in commercial and construction loan portfolios from December 31, 2008 and June
30, 2008 to June 30, 2009 reflected the slowdown in origination activity and increased loan
charge-offs as a result of the downturn in the real estate market, along with a deteriorated
economic environment and credit quality. Also, as previously described in the Corporations 2008
Annual Report and in the Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A, the Corporations U.S. mainland
banking operations exited and downsized certain loan origination channels, thus impacting
negatively the volume of loan originations.
The decline in the lease financing portfolio from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was primarily
the result of the sale of a lease financing portfolio from Popular Equipment Finance, as described
in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A. This also impacted the variance from June 30,
2008. Also, there was a slowdown in originations in the Puerto Rico operations.
The decrease in the consumer loan portfolio from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was mostly
reflected in personal loans, auto loans and HELOCs. There was a lower volume of personal and auto
loans in the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment due to current economic conditions
which have impacted the volume of new loan originations and the run-off of Popular Finances loan
portfolio. Popular Finance operations were closed in late 2008. Furthermore, there were reductions
in the consumer loan portfolio of BPNA, including E-LOAN, primarily due to the run-off mode of its
auto loan portfolios and HELOCs without any concentrated lending efforts in these products. The
decline in the consumer loan portfolio from June 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009 was also
influenced by the decline in the loan portfolio of PFH due to the significant sales executed in
2008 and the discontinuance of the business. PFH had $155 million in consumer loans as of June 30,
2008.
The mortgage loan portfolio as of June 30, 2009 remained at levels closely similar to December 31,
2008. The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment showed an increase of $108 million, and
was partially offset by a reduction at the BPNA reportable segment of $100 million since BPNA
ceased originating non-conventional mortgage loans as part of the BPNA Restructuring Plan. When
compared with June 30, 2008, the decrease in mortgage loans was principally due to PFHs mortgage
loan portfolio which approximated $882 million as of such date.
110
Table H provides a breakdown of the Other Assets caption presented in the consolidated statements
of condition.
TABLE H
Breakdown of Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Net deferred tax assets
(net of valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
390,467 |
|
|
$ |
357,507 |
|
|
$ |
32,960 |
|
|
$ |
807,884 |
|
|
$ |
(417,417 |
) |
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
228,675 |
|
|
|
224,634 |
|
|
|
4,041 |
|
|
|
219,867 |
|
|
|
8,808 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
136,634 |
|
|
|
136,236 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
198,286 |
|
|
|
(61,652 |
) |
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
91,558 |
|
|
|
92,412 |
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
108,008 |
|
|
|
(16,450 |
) |
Derivative assets |
|
|
76,019 |
|
|
|
109,656 |
|
|
|
(33,637 |
) |
|
|
50,121 |
|
|
|
25,898 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
66,943 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
65,257 |
|
|
|
515,273 |
|
|
|
(448,330 |
) |
Securitization advances and related assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,519 |
|
|
|
(299,519 |
) |
Others |
|
|
224,553 |
|
|
|
193,466 |
|
|
|
31,087 |
|
|
|
256,884 |
|
|
|
(32,331 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,214,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,597 |
|
|
$ |
99,252 |
|
|
$ |
2,455,842 |
|
|
$ |
(1,240,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Other assets from discontinued operations at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are presented as part of Assets from
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition. |
The increase in trade receivables from brokers and counterparties between December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009 was associated to the sale in late June 2009 of $59 million in corporate bonds
available-for-sale, which transaction settled in July 2009. The increase in net deferred tax assets
from the end of 2008 to June 30, 2009 was principally associated to the increase in the allowance
for loan losses in the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment. The decline in derivative
assets from December 31, 2008 was mostly the result of a lower fair value primarily in interest
rate swaps.
The decline of $1.2 billion in other assets from June 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009 was
principally because June 30, 2008 results include $691 million in other assets of PFH, consisting
mainly of $354 million in deferred tax assets and $300 million in securitization advances and
related assets. PFHs securitization advances and related assets were part of the asset sale
completed in the fourth quarter of 2008. The reduction in the deferred tax assets was the result of
recording in the second half of 2008 a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of the
Corporations U.S. operations. The decrease in trade receivables from brokers and counterparties
between June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of mortgage-backed securities sold
prior to quarter-end June 30, 2008, with a settlement date in July 2008. The decline in prepaid
expenses was principally in software packages. The increase in derivative assets from June 30, 2008
was mostly due to an increase in notional amounts and a positive mark-to-market on the interest
rate swap valuations as of such date.
Deposits, borrowings and capital
The composition of the Corporations financing to total assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 is included in Table I as follows:
TABLE I
Financing to Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) from |
|
% of total assets |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, 2008 to |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Non-interest bearing
deposits |
|
$ |
4,409 |
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Interest-bearing core
deposits |
|
|
15,516 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
Other interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
6,988 |
|
|
|
7,609 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Federal funds and
repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Other short-term
borrowings |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
111
A breakdown of the Corporations deposits at period-end is included in Table J.
TABLE J
Deposits Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, 2009 Vs. |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, 2009 Vs. |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Demand deposits * |
|
$ |
5,115,351 |
|
|
$ |
4,849,387 |
|
|
$ |
265,964 |
|
|
$ |
5,118,844 |
|
|
$ |
(3,493 |
) |
Savings, NOW and money
market deposits |
|
|
9,605,716 |
|
|
|
9,554,866 |
|
|
|
50,850 |
|
|
|
9,916,308 |
|
|
|
(310,592 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
12,192,418 |
|
|
|
13,145,952 |
|
|
|
(953,534 |
) |
|
|
12,080,576 |
|
|
|
111,842 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,913,485 |
|
|
$ |
27,550,205 |
|
|
$ |
(636,720 |
) |
|
$ |
27,115,728 |
|
|
$ |
(202,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. |
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit totaled $2.7 billion as of June 30, 2009, $3.1 billion as of
December 31, 2008 and $2.1 billion as of June 30, 2008. Brokered certificates of deposit, which are
typically sold through an intermediary to small retail investors, provide access to longer-term
funds that may not be available in the Puerto Rico market area and provide the ability to raise
additional funds without pressuring retail deposit pricing. In a rising rate scenario, their
pricing may be more sensitive to market rates than retail deposits.
Besides the reduction in time deposits because of lower reliance in brokered certificates of
deposit between December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, there was also a decline in time deposits at
the BPNA reportable segment. The latter was in part due to deleveraging strategies, including the
closure and consolidation of branches, as well as a gradual reduction in the pricing of deposits,
including deposits gathered through the internet platform of E-LOAN. The increase in demand
deposits from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was mainly in the BPPR reportable segment and
included public funds and deposits in trust.
The decline in savings, NOW and money market deposits from June 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009
was principally related to BPNA. During 2008 and 2009, management took actions to lower the rates
paid on certain deposits, including internet deposits, in part associated with the decline in rates
by the Fed.
Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable
and low-cost funds. The Corporation considers as core deposits all non-interest bearing deposits,
savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of
deposits with denominations under $100,000. The Corporations core deposits totaled $19.9 billion,
or 74% of total deposits, at June 30, 2009, compared to $19.9 billion and 72% at December 31, 2008
and $20.2 billion or 74% at June 30, 2008.
112
The distribution of certificates of deposit with denominations of $100 thousand and over at June
30, 2009, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 months or less |
|
$ |
2,442 |
|
3 to 6 months |
|
|
957 |
|
6 to 12 months |
|
|
977 |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,004 |
|
|
Borrowed funds amounted to $5.6 billion at June 30, 2009, compared to $6.9 billion at December
31, 2008 and $10.0 billion at June 30, 2008. Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements
provides additional information on the Corporations borrowings as of such dates. The decline in
borrowings from December 31, 2008 was directly related to the maturity of $753 million of unsecured
senior notes of Popular North America during the second quarter of 2009, which had been used to
fund the Corporations U.S. mainland operations. Federal funds purchased and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase as of June 30, 2009 presented a reduction of $610 million compared with
December 31, 2008, principally in repurchase agreements which declined by $465 million. This
decline was associated in part to the lower financing needs as a result of a lower volume of
investment securities.
The decline in borrowings from June 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009 of $4.4 billion was due to
lower financing requirements as a result of the sale of PFH assets and other loan portfolios in
2008. Also, the decrease was the result of a general reduction in asset size given the maturities
of investment securities and the downsizing of certain of the Corporations subsidiaries. From 2008
to 2009, the Corporation has placed less reliance on short-term borrowings, principally advances
from Federal Home Loan Banks and credit facilities with other financial institutions. The decline
was also related to the maturity of the previously mentioned unsecured senior notes.
Stockholders equity totaled $2.9 billion as of June 30, 2009, compared with $3.3 billion as of
December 31, 2008, and $3.7 billion as of June 30, 2008. The decrease in stockholders equity from
December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 reflects an increase in the Corporations accumulated deficit of
$284.7 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of tax, of $87.9
million. Similar factors influenced the reduction in stockholders equity from June 30, 2008 to the
same date in 2009, offset in part by the increase in preferred stock in late 2008. Refer to the
consolidated statements of condition and of changes in stockholders equity included in this Form
10-Q for information on the composition of stockholders equity at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2008. Also, the disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an
integral component of stockholders equity, are included in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive income (loss).
On May 1, 2009, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
470,000,000 shares to 700,000,000 shares. The stockholders also approved to decrease the par value
of the common stock of the Corporation from $6 per share to $0.01 per share. The decrease in the
par value of the Corporations common stock had no effect on the total dollar value of the
Corporations stockholders equity. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation
transferred an amount equal to the product of the number of shares issued and outstanding and $5.99
(the difference between the old and new par values), from the common stock account to surplus
(additional paid-in capital).
In June 2009, management announced the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common stock
and Series A and B preferred stock.
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of June
30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $392 million; June 30, 2008 $374 million). There were no transfers
between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008.
113
The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking
regulations. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2008 are
presented on Table K. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.
TABLE K
Capital Adequacy Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
$ |
2,993,330 |
|
|
$ |
3,272,375 |
|
|
$ |
3,376,331 |
|
Supplementary (Tier II) capital |
|
|
358,856 |
|
|
|
384,975 |
|
|
|
407,009 |
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
3,352,186 |
|
|
$ |
3,657,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,783,340 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items |
|
$ |
24,735,838 |
|
|
$ |
26,838,542 |
|
|
$ |
28,876,581 |
|
Off-balance sheet items |
|
|
3,154,444 |
|
|
|
3,431,217 |
|
|
|
3,271,018 |
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
27,890,282 |
|
|
$ |
30,269,759 |
|
|
$ |
32,147,599 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
36,217,245 |
|
|
$ |
38,702,787 |
|
|
$ |
39,626,240 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (minimum required 4.00%) |
|
|
10.73 |
% |
|
|
10.81 |
% |
|
|
10.50 |
% |
Total capital (minimum required 8.00%) |
|
|
12.02 |
|
|
|
12.08 |
|
|
|
11.77 |
|
Leverage ratio * |
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
8.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted
quarterly average assets,
depending on the banks classification. |
As of June 30, 2009, the capital adequacy minimum requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in
thousands): Total Capital of $2,231,223, Tier I Capital of $1,115,611, and Tier I Leverage of
$1,086,517 based on a 3% ratio or $1,448,690 based on a 4% ratio according to the Banks
classification.
Regulatory capital requirements for banking institutions are based on Tier 1 and Total
capital, which include both common stock and certain qualifying preferred stock and trust preferred
securities. Nonetheless, as overall economic conditions in general and credit quality in particular
have continued to worsen, there has been an increasing regulatory and market focus on Tier 1 common
equity and Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio of banking institutions. Recent
losses have continued to reduce the Corporations Tier 1 common equity. The Corporations Tier 1
common/risk-weighted assets ratio was 2.45% as of June 30, 2009. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measure section below for a reconciliation of Tier 1 common to common stockholders
equity and a discussion of our use of this non-GAAP financial measure in this Form 10-Q. Also,
refer to the Exchange Offer and Dividends on Preferred Stock and Distributions on Trust Preferred
Securities section in this Form 10-Q for further information.
114
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure:
The table below presents a reconciliation of Tier 1 common equity (also referred to as Tier 1
common) to common stockholders equity. Ratios calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have
become a focus of regulators and investors, and management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common
equity assist investors in analyzing the Corporations capital position. In connection with the Supervisory
Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the Federal Reserve began supplementing its assessment of the
capital adequacy of a bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as Tier 1
common equity. Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1
capital, codified in the federal banking regulations, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP
financial measure.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and
are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to calculate these
measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these non-GAAP financial
measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations
as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of
results as reported under GAAP.
The following table provides a reconciliation of common stockholders equity (GAAP) to Tier 1
common equity (non-GAAP):
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,412,701 |
|
Less: Unrealized gains on available for sale securities, net of tax (1) |
|
|
(48,296 |
) |
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets (2) |
|
|
(167,223 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(607,164 |
) |
Other disallowed intangibles |
|
|
(25,797 |
) |
Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges (3) |
|
|
120,256 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
682,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair
values, in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines.
In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct
net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with
readily determinable fair values, net of tax. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $193 million of the Corporations $390 million of net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2009, were included
without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while
approximately $167 million of such assets at June 30, 2009 exceeded the limitation imposed by these
guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital.
The remaining $30 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax assets
at June 30, 2009 represented primarily the following items (a) the
deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are
permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation
under the guidelines; (b) the deferred tax asset corresponding to the
pension liability adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other
comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability associated
with goodwill. |
|
(3) |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the impact of SFAS No. 158. |
EXCHANGE OFFER AND DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS ON TRUST PREFERRED
SECURITIES
On June 29, 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue up to 390 million shares of its
common stock in exchange for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for the
trust preferred securities referred to in the prospectus for the exchange offer referred to below
(the Exchange Offer). In connection with the Exchange Offer, for each share of Series A preferred
stock, share of Series B preferred stock or trust preferred security accepted in accordance with
the terms of the Exchange Offer, the Corporation is offering to issue a number of shares of its
common stock equal to the Exchange Value, set forth in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer,
divided by the Relevant Price. The Relevant Price will be equal to the greater of (1) the
average Volume Weighted Average Price, or VWAP, of a share of the Corporations common stock
during the five-trading day period ending on the
115
second business day immediately preceding the
expiration date of the Exchange Offer (which we currently expect to be August 18, 2009,
unless the Exchange Offer is extended), determined as described in the prospectus for the Exchange
Offer or (2) the Minimum Share Price of $2.50 per share of the Corporations common stock. The
expiration date for the Exchange Offer is August 20, 2009, unless the Corporation extends the
Exchange Offer or terminates it early.
The closing sale price of the Corporations common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on August 7,
2009, the trading day prior to the filing of this Form 10-Q, was $1.36 per share, which is
substantially less than the Minimum Share Price. The Exchange Offer terms provide that in the event
that the average VWAP is less than the Minimum Share Price, the number of shares of the
Corporations common stock that participants in the Exchange Offer will receive will be calculated
on the basis of the Minimum Share Price rather than the average VWAP. In that case, participants
in the Exchange Offer would receive shares of the Corporations common stock with a value less (and
possibly significantly less) than the value of the shares of common stock such participants would
receive in the absence of the Minimum Share Price limitation.
If participation in the Exchange Offer is low because of the application of the Minimum Share
Price, the Exchange Offer will not increase the amount of the Corporations Tier 1 common equity as
much as it would have been increased if participation had been high. As stated in the prospectus,
this could result in the Corporation taking a number of further actions to preserve or increase
Tier 1 common equity. One highly probable action is a suspension of distributions on the trust
preferred securities that, once suspended, are unlikely to be resumed for a number of years.
In connection with the Exchange Offer, at the Corporations request,
the U.S. Treasury has agreed to exchange all $935 million of its outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock of the Corporation for $935 million
of newly issued trust preferred securities (the New Trust Preferred Securities). The New Trust Preferred Securities will have a distribution rate of 5%
until December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter (which is the same as the dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock). The sole asset and only source of
funds to make payments on the New Trust Preferred Securities will be perpetual junior subordinated indebtedness issued by the Corporation to the new trust.
The Corporation expects to complete the exchange with the U.S. Treasury promptly following the completion of the Exchange Offer.
The Corporations agreement with the U.S. Treasury to exchange the Series C Preferred Stock into newly issued trust preferred securities is subject to
certain closing conditions, including the completion of the Exchange Offer and related transactions causing the increase in the Corporations Tier 1 common equity described in the prospectus for the Exchange Offer and the completion of definitive documentation acceptable to the U.S. Treasury.
The Corporation has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus and related Exchange
Offer materials) with the SEC for the Exchange Offer.
For further discussion of these and other matters related to the Corporation, its capital needs and
the Exchange Offer, refer to the prospectus and other documents the Corporation has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) related to the Exchange Offer, including the Risk
Factors section in the prospectus and the risk factors captioned Even if we complete the Exchange
Offer, without a high level of participation, we will not realize the intended goal of
substantially increasing Tier 1 common equity and If the Exchange
Offer is successful, there may no longer be a trading market for the shares of Preferred Stock or
Trust Preferred Securities and the price for shares of Preferred Stock or Trust Preferred
Securities may be depressed of the prospectus.
This Form 10-Q is not an offer to sell or purchase or an offer to exchange or a solicitation of
acceptance of an offer to sell or purchase or offer to exchange, which may be made only pursuant to
the terms of the prospectus and related letter of transmittal, as applicable.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular
Financial Holdings in 2008 by selling substantially all assets and closing service branches and
other units.
For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations of PFH are presented
as Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and as Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in
the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. Prior periods presented in the
consolidated statement of operations, as well as note disclosures covering income and expense
amounts included in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements, were
retrospectively adjusted for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of condition and
related amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 do not
reflect the reclassification of PFHs assets / liabilities to discontinued operations.
Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations amounted to $3 million as of June 30, 2009,
compared to $13 million as of December 31, 2008. PFHs total assets amounted to $2.0 billion as of
June 30, 2008, principally consisting of $1.2 billion in loans, of which $0.8 billion were
accounted at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159, and $354 million in deferred tax assets, $300
million in servicing advances and related assets, and $56 million in
116
mortgage servicing rights. As
disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation substantially sold these loan portfolios and
servicing related assets in late 2008. As of June 30, 2008, all loans and borrowings recognized at
fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159
pertained to the discontinued operations of PFH.
Assets held by the PFH discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 consisted principally of $1
million in loans measured at fair value with an unpaid principal balance of $10 million.
Liabilities from discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 amounted to approximately $14 million,
which primarily consisted of indemnity and representation and warranty reserves associated to loans
sold to third-parties under certain sales agreements.
The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Non-interest (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of tax |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.9 |
) |
|
Management implemented a series of actions in 2008 to downsize and eventually discontinue the
PFH operations. These actions included two major restructuring plans, which are described in the
2008 Annual Report. These are the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan and the PFH Branch
Network Restructuring Plan. The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan commenced execution in the
second half of 2008 and included the elimination of substantially all employment positions and
termination of contracts with the objective of discontinuing PFHs operations. The PFH Branch
Network Restructuring Plan resulted in the sale of a substantial portion of PFHs loan portfolio in
the first quarter of 2008 and the closure of Equity Ones consumer service branches, which
represented, at the time, the only significant channel for PFH to continue originating loans. The
PFH Branch Network Restructuring Plan was completed.
The following section provides information on the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring plan, which is
substantially complete as the company transferred the servicing of the loan portfolios of its
affiliated company, E-LOAN, to a third-party in June 2009. PFH continues to employ 69 FTEs that are
primarily retained for a transition period. Additional restructuring costs could be incurred during
2009 associated to personnel costs and lease terminations, but these are not expected to be
significant to the Corporations results of operations.
PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
resulted in charges, on a pre-tax basis, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
86 |
(a) |
|
$ |
981 |
(a) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
117
As of June 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined
charges for 2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
8,040 |
|
Quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,105 |
|
|
$ |
9,021 |
|
|
The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan charges are included in the line item Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table presents the activity in the accrued balances for the PFH Discontinuance Plan
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
895 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
86 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
|
118
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY
Non-performing assets
Non-performing assets include past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest,
renegotiated loans and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including
certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table L. For a summary of the Corporations policy
for placing loans on non-accrual status, refer to the sections of Loans and Allowance for Loan
Losses in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Popular, Inc.s 2008
Annual Report.
TABLE L
Non-Performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
Vs. |
|
|
June 30, |
|
of loans HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
of loans HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
of loans HIP (1) |
|
June 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 (2) |
|
by category |
|
2008 (2) |
|
by category |
|
2008 |
|
2008 (3) |
|
by category |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
686,150 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
$ |
464,802 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
221,348 |
|
|
$ |
390,181 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
295,969 |
|
Construction |
|
|
767,029 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
319,438 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
447,591 |
|
|
|
216,374 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
550,655 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
11,825 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
11,345 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
11,393 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
441,773 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
338,961 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
102,812 |
|
|
|
242,104 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
199,669 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
71,413 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
68,263 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
63,319 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
8,094 |
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
1,978,190 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
1,202,809 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
775,381 |
|
|
|
923,371 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
1,054,819 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
105,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,832 |
|
|
|
102,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
2,083,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,292,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
791,213 |
|
|
$ |
1,026,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,057,563 |
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or
more |
|
$ |
180,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,185 |
|
|
$ |
114,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held- in-portfolio |
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing assets |
|
|
55.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
57.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HIP = held-in-portfolio |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 exclude assets from discontinued operations. Non-performing loans and other real estate from discontinued operations amounted to $0.8
million and $0.5 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009, and $3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Non-performing loans and other real estate assets pertaining to the discontinued operations, which amounted to $151 million and $31 million, respectively, are included in the amounts
disclosed as of June 30, 2008. Non-performing loans measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159, which amounted to $110 million as of June 30, 2008, are excluded from the amounts
disclosed as of June 30, 2008. |
Non-performing assets attributable to the continuing operations totaled $2.1 billion as of
June 30, 2009, compared with $1.3 billion as of December 31, 2008. The increase in non-performing
assets from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was primarily related to increases in commercial and
construction loans. Non-performing commercial and construction loans increased from December 31,
2008 to June 30, 2009 primarily in the BPPR reportable segment by $493 million and in the Banco
Popular North America reportable segment by $176 million.
The increase in non-performing commercial loans from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 resulted
from the continuing downturn in the U.S. economy and the recessionary economy in Puerto Rico that
is now in its fourth year. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans
held-in-portfolio rose from 3.4% as of December 31, 2008 to 5.2% as of June 30, 2009.
Non-performing commercial loans increased from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 primarily in the
BPPR reportable segment by $122 million and in the Banco Popular North America reportable segment
by $99 million. There were 6 commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual
status as of June 30, 2009, compared with 2 commercial loan relationships as of December 31, 2008.
119
Non-performing construction loans increased $448 million from the end of 2008 to June 30, 2009
primarily in the BPPR reportable segment by $371 million and in the Banco Popular North America
reportable segment by $77 million. There were 22 construction loan relationships greater than $10
million in non-accrual status as of June 30, 2009, mostly related to the Puerto Rico operations,
compared with 6 as of December 31, 2008. Some of the construction non-performing credits in Puerto
Rico were judgmentally considered impaired for SFAS No. 114 purposes in previous quarters and
specific reserves were recorded in prior periods, as deemed necessary. Construction loans
considered impaired under the Corporations criteria for SFAS No. 114 amounted to $782 million as
of June 30, 2009, compared with $375 million as of December 31, 2008. The specific reserves for
impaired construction loans amounted to $198 million as of June 30, 2009 and $120 million as of
December 31, 2008. The construction loans in non-performing status are primarily residential real
estate construction loans which have been adversely impacted by general market economic conditions,
decreases in property values, oversupply in certain areas and reduced absorption rates. In the
current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become one of
the most important factors in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of
the allowance for loan losses.
Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $103 million from December 31, 2008 to
June 30, 2009, mainly in the BPPR reportable segment by $66 million and in the Banco Popular North
America reportable segment by $37 million. Although the Puerto Ricos mortgage portfolio reported
higher non-performing loans, the net charge-off experience during 2009 has remained at a low level.
Mortgage loans net charge-offs in the BPPR reportable segment for the quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2009 amounted to $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The BPPR reportable
segments mortgage loan portfolio averaged approximately $2.7 billion for the six months ended June
30, 2009. The higher level of non-performing residential mortgage loans in the U.S. mainland
operations was principally attributed to Banco Popular North Americas non-conventional mortgage
business. BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of June 30, 2009
approximated $1.1 billion. As indicated in the Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A, the
Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA during 2009. This
portfolio reported a total of $140 million worth of loan modifications as of June 30, 2009, which
were considered trouble debt restructurings (TDR) since they involved granting a concession to
borrowers under financial difficulties. Although SFAS No. 114 excludes large groups of
smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage
loans), it specifically requires its application to modifications considered TDR. These TDR
mortgage loans were evaluated for impairment resulting in a reserve of $30 million at June 30,
2009. Mortgage loans net charge-offs in the Banco Popular North America reportable segment amounted
to $23.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and $52.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, an increase of $14.3 million and $34.9 million, respectively, compared to the
results for the same periods of the previous year. This increase was related to the slowdown in
the United States housing sector.
Other real estate, which represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, increased by
$16 million from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. This increase was principally due to an
increase in the BPPR reportable segment by $25 million, partially offset by a decrease of $9
million in other real estate pertaining to the Banco Popular North America reportable segment
mainly driven by sales of properties. Notwithstanding, with the slowdown in the housing market,
there is a continued economic deterioration in certain geographic areas, which also has a softening
effect on the market for resale of repossessed real estate properties. Defaulted loans have
increased, and these loans move through the default process to the other real estate
classification. The combination of increased flow of defaulted loans from the loan portfolio to
other real estate owned and the slowing of the liquidation market has resulted in an increase in
the number of units on hand.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are composed primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other
insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations financial
statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Under SFAS No. 140, servicers of loans
underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that
they have the option to purchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing
loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other
financial institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from
the sellers / servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements.
120
In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table L, there were $202 million of performing
loans as of June 30, 2009, which in managements opinion are currently subject to potential future
classification as non-performing and are considered impaired under SFAS No. 114. As of December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2008, these potential problem loans approximated $206 million and $150 million,
respectively.
Under standard industry practice, closed-end consumer loans are not customarily placed on
non-accrual status prior to being charged-off.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses, which represents managements estimate of credit losses
inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit
losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder
of the loan and lease portfolio. The Corporations management evaluates the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current
economic conditions and the resulting impact on Populars loan portfolio, the composition of the
portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic
credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among
other factors.
The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate
outcome is unknown such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or
markets. Other factors that can affect managements estimates are the years of historical data to
include when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards
and loan impairment measurement, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual
borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the
various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance
for loan losses. Consequently, the business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of
operations could also be affected.
The methodology used to establish the allowance for loan losses is based on the accounting guidance
set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS No. 5) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS No. 114).
SFAS No. 5 provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. During
this quarter, the Corporation enhanced the SFAS No. 5 assessment by establishing a more granular
segmentation of loans with similar risk characteristics, reducing the historical base loss periods
employed, and strengthening the analysis pertaining to the environmental factors considered. The
determination of the allowance for loan losses under SFAS No. 5 is based on historical net loss
rates (including SFAS No. 114 losses) by loan type and by legal entity adjusted for recent net
charge-off trends and environmental factors. The environmental factors, which include credit and
economic indicators, are assessed to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause
estimated credit losses to differ from historical loss experience. For subprime mortgage loans, the
allowance for loan losses is established to cover at least one year of projected losses which are
inherent in these portfolios.
Under SFAS No. 114, up to December 31, 2008, the Corporation defined as impaired loans those
commercial borrowers with outstanding debt of $250,000 or more and with interest and /or principal
90 days or more past due. Also, specific commercial borrowers with outstanding debt of over
$500,000 and over were deemed impaired when, based on current information and events, management
considered that it was probable that the debtor would be unable to pay all amounts due according to
the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Effective
January 1, 2009, the Corporation continues to apply
the same definition except that it prospectively increased the threshold of outstanding debt to
$1,000,000 for the identification of newly impaired commercial and construction loans. Although
SFAS No. 114 excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively
evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications
considered troubled debt restructurings be analyzed under its provisions.
An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired
loan exceeds the
121
present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective
rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from
appraisals. The Corporation periodically requires updated appraisal reports for loans that are
considered impaired under SFAS No. 114. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews
appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered
impaired for SFAS No. 114 purposes.
Table M summarizes the detail of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including
charge-offs and recoveries by loan category for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008.
TABLE M
Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,057,125 |
|
|
$ |
579,379 |
|
|
$ |
477,746 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
|
$ |
548,832 |
|
|
$ |
333,975 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
349,444 |
|
|
|
189,165 |
|
|
|
160,279 |
|
|
|
721,973 |
|
|
|
350,401 |
|
|
|
371,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,406,569 |
|
|
|
768,544 |
|
|
|
638,025 |
|
|
|
1,604,780 |
|
|
|
899,233 |
|
|
|
705,547 |
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
74,809 |
|
|
|
44,004 |
|
|
|
30,805 |
|
|
|
123,636 |
|
|
|
75,150 |
|
|
|
48,486 |
|
Construction |
|
|
76,687 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
71,497 |
|
|
|
121,495 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
116,305 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
5,203 |
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
10,994 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
25,170 |
|
|
|
9,730 |
|
|
|
15,440 |
|
|
|
56,763 |
|
|
|
18,936 |
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
92,693 |
|
|
|
60,344 |
|
|
|
32,349 |
|
|
|
176,091 |
|
|
|
116,855 |
|
|
|
59,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
274,562 |
|
|
|
124,630 |
|
|
|
149,932 |
|
|
|
489,134 |
|
|
|
227,125 |
|
|
|
262,009 |
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,931 |
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
12,422 |
|
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
5,938 |
|
Construction |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
14,965 |
|
|
|
13,139 |
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,232 |
|
|
|
11,492 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
30,593 |
|
|
|
21,376 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
Net loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
69,878 |
|
|
|
40,372 |
|
|
|
29,506 |
|
|
|
111,214 |
|
|
|
68,666 |
|
|
|
42,548 |
|
Construction |
|
|
76,534 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
71,344 |
|
|
|
121,342 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
116,152 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
24,633 |
|
|
|
9,640 |
|
|
|
14,993 |
|
|
|
55,781 |
|
|
|
18,689 |
|
|
|
37,092 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
85,165 |
|
|
|
53,378 |
|
|
|
31,787 |
|
|
|
161,126 |
|
|
|
103,716 |
|
|
|
57,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
260,330 |
|
|
|
113,138 |
|
|
|
147,192 |
|
|
|
458,541 |
|
|
|
205,749 |
|
|
|
252,792 |
|
|
Write-downs related to loans transferred to
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
Change in allowance for loan losses from
discontinued
operations (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,001 |
) |
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,137 |
) |
|
|
37,137 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,146,239 |
|
|
$ |
652,730 |
|
|
$ |
493,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,239 |
|
|
$ |
652,730 |
|
|
$ |
493,509 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to annualized
net charge-offs |
|
|
1.34 |
x |
|
|
1.67 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.57 |
x |
|
|
1.70 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A negative amount represents lower provision for loan losses recorded during the period
compared to net charge-offs. |
122
Table N presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the
quarters and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 by loan category.
TABLE N
Annualized Net Charge-offs to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
14.46 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7.73 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
Credit quality performance has continued to be under pressure during 2009. More generally, all
of the Corporations loan portfolios have been affected by the sustained deterioration of the
economic conditions affecting the markets in which the Corporation operates, including higher
unemployment levels, unprecedented reduced absorption rates of new housing units and declines in
property values.
The increase in construction loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared
with the same quarter in the previous year, was related to the Corporations Puerto Rico and U.S.
mainland operations which continue to experience credit deterioration trends that had a particular
impact in the construction sector as a result of unprecedented reduced absorption levels. The most
significant reserves for impaired loans recorded during the second quarter of 2009 pertain to
particular construction borrowers, mainly in BPPR. The construction loans net charge-offs for the
BPPR operations amounted to $48 million for the quarter and $72 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, while for BPNA these amounts were $29 million and $49 million, respectively.
Construction net charge-offs recorded during the second quarter of 2009 were mainly related to
credits with specific reserves established in prior quarters pursuant to SFAS No. 114 evaluations.
Management has identified construction loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114 and established
specific reserves based on the value of the collateral.
The increase in commercial loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to
the same quarter in the previous year, was mostly associated with the deteriorated economic
conditions reflected across all industry sectors. The Banco Popular North America reportable
segment had a ratio of annualized commercial loans net charge-offs to average commercial loans
held-in-portfolio of 1.92% for the second quarter of 2009, compared with 0.48% for the same quarter
in the previous year. The ratio of annualized commercial loans net charge-offs to average
commercial loans held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was 2.27% for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 1.71% for the second quarter of 2008.
Mortgage loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the
continuing operations increased primarily in the U.S. mainland operations. The Banco Popular North
America reportable segment reported a ratio of annualized mortgage loans net charge-offs to average
mortgage loans held-in-portfolio of 5.85% for the second quarter of 2009, compared with 2.18% for
the same quarter in the previous year. Deteriorating economic conditions in the U.S. mainland
housing market have impacted the mortgage industry delinquency rates. The general level of property
values in the U.S. mainland, as measured by several indexes widely followed by the market, has
declined. These declines are the result of ongoing market adjustments that are aligning property
values with income levels and home inventories. The supply of homes in the market has increased
substantially, and additional property value decreases may be required to clear the overhang of
excess inventory in the U.S. market. Declining property values affect the credit quality of the
Corporations U.S. mainland mortgage loan portfolio because the value of the homes underlying the
loans is the primary source of repayment in the event of foreclosure. As indicated in the
Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A, the Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional
mortgage loans at BPNA. Mortgage loans net charge-offs in the BPPR reportable segment
have remained at a low level, amounting to $1 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared to
net charge-offs of $0.3 million in the same quarter of the previous year. The slowdown in the
housing sector in Puerto Rico has increased pressure on home prices and reduced sale activity. The
ratio of annualized mortgage loans net charge-offs to average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio in
the BPPR reportable segment was 0.14% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared with 0.04% for
the same quarter in the previous year. BPPRs mortgage loans are primarily
123
fixed-rate fully amortizing, full-documentation loans that do not have the
level of layered risk associated with subprime loans offered by certain major U.S. mortgage loan
originators. Moreover, the Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing
prices that is affecting some regions in the U.S. mainland. Deteriorating economic conditions have
impacted the mortgage delinquency rates in Puerto Rico increasing the levels of non-accruing
mortgage loans. However, BPPRs net charge-off experience to date remains low.
Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans held-in-portfolio rose
mostly due to higher delinquencies in the U.S. mainland. Consumer loans net charge-offs in the BPNA
reportable segment rose for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, when compared with the same quarter in
the previous year, by $20 million. The ratio of annualized consumer loans net charge-offs to
average consumer loans held-in-portfolio in the Banco Popular North America reportable segment was
14.10% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to 6.08% for the second quarter of 2008. This
increase was principally related to home equity lines of credit and second lien mortgage loans,
which are categorized by the Corporation as consumer loans. A home equity line of credit is a loan
secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over
the debt outstanding for the first mortgage. The deterioration in the delinquency profile and the
declines in property values have negatively impacted charge-offs. E-LOAN represented approximately
$17.4 million of the increase in the net charge-offs in consumer loans held-in-portfolio for the
BPNA reportable segment. E-LOAN has ceased originating these types of loans. Consumer loans net
charge-offs in the BPPR reportable segment rose for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, when compared
with the same quarter in the previous year, by $12.0 million. The ratio of annualized consumer
loans net charge-offs to average consumer loans held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment
was 5.50% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared with 3.76% for the same quarter of 2008.
Similar factors influenced the variances in net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2009
when compared with the same period in the previous year.
The allowance for loan losses increased from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 by $263 million.
The allowance for loan losses represented 4.66% of loans held-in-portfolio at June 30, 2009,
compared with 3.43% at December 31, 2008. The increase from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was
mainly attributed to reserves for construction loans due to the continued deterioration of the
economic and housing market conditions in Puerto Rico, and also in the U.S. mainland. Credit
deterioration trends have been reflected across all industry sectors, but have been most noticeable
in the residential construction market as a result of unprecedented reductions in absorption
levels. The most significant reserves for impaired loans during 2009 pertain to particular
construction borrowers, mainly in BPPR. Also, the Corporation recorded higher reserves to cover
inherent losses in the home equity lines of credit portfolios of the U.S. mainland operations. The
persistent declines in residential real estate values, combined with the reduced ability of certain
homeowners to refinance or repay their residential real estate obligations, have resulted in higher
delinquencies and losses in these U.S. mainland portfolios.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded $129 million in provision for
loans classified as impaired under SFAS No. 114. As of June 30, 2009, there were $1.4 billion of
SFAS No. 114 impaired loans with a related specific allowance for loan losses of $313 million,
compared with impaired loans of $898 million and a specific allowance of $195 million as of
December 31, 2008.
In the current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become
one of the most important factors in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate
level of allowance for loan losses. Management has increased the allowance for loan losses in the
construction sector mainly through specific reserves for the loans considered impaired under SFAS
No. 114. The likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded investment for a real
estate loan is remote. However, in some cases, declining real estate values have resulted in the
determination that the estimated value of the collateral was insufficient to cover all of the
recorded investment in the loans during recent quarters.
124
The Corporations recorded investment in commercial, construction and mortgage loans that were
considered impaired and the related valuation allowance calculated under SFAS No. 114 as of June
30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
(In millions) |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance required |
|
$ |
1,034.4 |
|
|
$ |
313.1 |
|
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
|
$ |
435.4 |
|
|
$ |
123.1 |
|
No valuation allowance required |
|
|
410.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,444.9 |
|
|
$ |
313.1 |
|
|
$ |
897.6 |
|
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
|
$ |
647.8 |
|
|
$ |
123.1 |
|
|
With respect to the $411 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for
which no allowance for loan losses was required as of June 30, 2009, management followed SFAS No.
114 guidance. As prescribed by SFAS No. 114, when a loan is impaired, the measurement of the
impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired
loan discounted at the loans original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of
the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A
loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the
underlying collateral. The $411 million impaired commercial loans were collateral dependent loans
in which management performed a detailed analysis based on the fair value of the collateral less
estimated costs to sell and determined that the collateral was deemed adequate to cover any losses
as of June 30, 2009.
Average impaired loans during the second quarter of 2009 and 2008 were $1.3 billion and $549
million, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired loans of $2.7 million
and $2.0 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
125
The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations
allowance for loan and lease losses as of June 30, 2009 by loan category and by whether the
allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant the requirements of SFAS No.
114 or through a general valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 5:
TABLE O
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses by Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
SFAS No. 114 Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
85,608 |
|
|
$ |
197,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
313,090 |
|
SFAS No. 114 impaired loans |
|
$ |
522,678 |
|
|
$ |
781,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
140,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,444,887 |
|
SFAS No. 114 ALLL to SFAS
No. 114 impaired loans |
|
|
16.38 |
% |
|
|
25.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 5 General ALLL |
|
$ |
239,004 |
|
|
$ |
145,910 |
|
|
$ |
29,934 |
|
|
$ |
102,331 |
|
|
$ |
315,970 |
|
|
$ |
833,149 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding SFAS. No 114
impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,555,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,251,537 |
|
|
$ |
730,396 |
|
|
$ |
4,304,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,319,214 |
|
|
$ |
23,161,175 |
|
SFAS No. 5 ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio, excluding
SFAS. No 114 impaired loans |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
11.66 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
324,612 |
|
|
$ |
343,808 |
|
|
$ |
29,934 |
|
|
$ |
131,915 |
|
|
$ |
315,970 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,239 |
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio |
|
$ |
13,078,507 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,447 |
|
|
$ |
730,396 |
|
|
$ |
4,444,498 |
|
|
$ |
4,319,214 |
|
|
$ |
24,606,062 |
|
ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
16.91 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
The existing adverse economic conditions are expected to persist at least through 2009, thus
it is likely that the Corporation will continue to experience heightened credit losses, additional
significant provisions for loan losses, an increased allowance for loan losses and higher levels of
non-performing assets. While management believes that the Corporations allowance for loan losses
was adequate at June 30, 2009, there is no certainty that it will be sufficient to cover future
credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market
conditions or events negatively affecting specific customers, industries or markets both in Puerto
Rico and the United States.
Management has acted to help mitigate future credit costs by implementing the following
loss-mitigation measures during 2009:
|
|
|
substantially increased resources at the commercial and construction loan divisions for
credit management; |
|
|
|
revised credit standards, adjusted underwriting criteria and reduced risk exposures; |
|
|
|
enhanced collection tools and strategies to mitigate losses focusing on early detection; |
|
|
|
modified over $140 million in non-conventional mortgages in the U.S. mainland operations
(as of June 30, 2009); and |
|
|
|
consolidated the Puerto Rico consumer finance operations into retail business. |
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $7.2 billion as of June 30, 2009, $7.1 billion as of
December 31, 2008, and $7.7 billion as of June 30, 2008. Commercial letters of credit and stand-by
letters of credit amounted to $18 million and $168 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009; $19
million and $181 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008; and
126
$21 million and $163 million as of June 30, 2008. In addition, the Corporation has commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to $59 million as of June 30, 2009, $71 million as of December 31,
2008 and $163 million as of June 30, 2008.
The Corporation maintains a reserve of approximately $17 million for potential losses associated
with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit. The estimated
reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and
the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance
for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from
the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated
statement of condition.
Geographical and government risk
As explained in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation is exposed to geographical and government
risk. The Corporations assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business
segment reporting are presented in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
A significant portion of the Corporations financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated
in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the Island) and the Islands economy has been deteriorating
for several years.
This decline in the Islands economy has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in the
Corporations loan originations, an increase in the level of our non-performing assets, loan loss
provisions and charge-offs, particularly in its construction loan portfolio, an increase in the
rate of foreclosure loss on mortgage loans and a reduction in the value of its loans and loan
servicing portfolio, all of which have adversely affected Populars profitability. If the decline
in economic activity continues, there could be further adverse effects on the Corporations
profitability.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government is currently facing a fiscal deficit which has been
estimated at approximately $3.0 billion or over 30% of its annual budget. It continues to review
alternatives for reducing the deficit, as its access to the municipal bond market and its credit
ratings depend, in part, on achieving a balanced budget. Measures that the government has
implemented have included reducing expenses, including public-sector employment through layoffs of
employees. It has been reported that the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government could layoff as
many as 30,000 employees, with approximately 8,000 employee layoffs taking place in early June
2009. Since the government is an important source of employment on the Island, these measures could
have the effect of intensifying the current recessionary cycle.
The economy of Puerto Rico is sensitive to the price of oil in the global market. The Island does
not have significant mass transit available to the public and most of its electricity is powered by
oil, making it highly sensitive to fluctuations in oil prices. A substantial increase in its price
could impact adversely the economy of Puerto Rico, by reducing disposable income and increasing the
operating costs of most businesses and the government. Consumer spending is particularly sensitive
to wide fluctuations in oil prices.
The level of real estate prices in Puerto Rico has been more stable than in other U.S. markets, but
the current economic environment and future developments in Puerto Rico and the mainland U.S. could
further pressure residential property values. Lower real estate values could increase loan
delinquencies, impairments, foreclosures and the cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate
collateral.
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has had an
adverse effect on the credit quality of our loan portfolios. The continuation of the economic
slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase in the
short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may
also impact growth in our other interest and non-interest revenue sources.
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had $1.1 billion of credit facilities granted to or guaranteed
by the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, of which $215 million are uncommitted
lines of credit. Of these total credit facilities granted, $858 million in loans were outstanding
as of June 30, 2009. A substantial portion of the Corporations credit exposure to the Government
of Puerto Rico is either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior and
subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or
products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various
127
municipalities
in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality has been pledged to their repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy
special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general
obligation bonds and loans. Another portion of these loans consists of special obligations of
various municipalities that are payable from the basic real and personal property taxes collected
within such municipalities. The good faith and credit obligations of the municipalities have a
first lien on the basic property taxes.
Furthermore, as of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had outstanding $382 million in Obligations of
Puerto Rico, States and Political Subdivisions as part of its investment portfolio. Refer to Notes
6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of that total, $359
million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its municipalities.
Of that portfolio, $45 million are in the form of Puerto Rico Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds,
which are currently rated Ba1, one notch below investment grade, by Moodys, while Standard &
Poors Rating Services rates them as investment grade. At June 30, 2009, the Puerto Rico
Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds represented approximately $5 million in unrealized losses in the
Corporations portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale. The Corporation is closely
monitoring the political and economic situation of the Island and evaluates the portfolio for any
declines in value that management may consider being other-than-temporary.
As further detailed in Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial
portion of the Corporations investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in
the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well
as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae. In addition, $226 million of residential
mortgages and $405 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or
its agencies at June 30, 2009.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the
three-level hierarchy as required by SFAS No. 157, and the level within the hierarchy is based on
whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable or
unobservable. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs
reflect the Corporations estimates about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability based on the best information available. The hierarchy is broken down into
three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant
degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that
are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3- Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial asset or liability.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about what market
participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based on
the best available information, which might include the Corporations own data such as
internally- developed models and discounted cash flow analyses. Assessments with respect to
assumptions that market participants would use are inherently difficult to determine and
use of different assumptions could result in material changes to these fair value
measurements. |
The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets,
available-for-sale securities, derivatives and mortgage servicing rights. From time to time, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as
loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain
other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations fair
value
128
measurement disclosures required by SFAS No. 157. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $7.5
billion, or 94%, of the assets from continuing operations measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and,
therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The remaining 6% were classified as Level 3 since
their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs. Additionally, the
Corporations continuing operations reported $628 million of financial assets that were measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2009, all of which were classified as Level 3 in
the hierarchy. Also, commencing in January 2009, the Corporation adopted the provisions of SFAS No.
157 for nonfinancial assets, particularly impacting other real estate. Nonfinancial assets from
continuing operations reported under the guidelines of SFAS
No. 157 amounted to $58 million as of
June 30, 2009.
The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use
of unobservable inputs to determine fair value.
The estimate of fair value reflects the Corporations judgment regarding appropriate valuation
methods and assumptions. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the fair value of a
financial instrument depends on a number of factors, such as type of instrument, the liquidity of
the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the valuation, as well as the
contractual characteristics of the instrument.
If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that
primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities,
credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When
market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more
subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results
from diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of
market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on
modeling techniques, such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as
interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation
adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is
adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.
Fair values are volatile and are affected by factors such as interest rates, liquidity of the
instrument and market sentiment. Notwithstanding the judgment required in determining the fair
value of the Corporations assets and liabilities, management believes that fair values are
reasonable based on the consistency of the processes followed, which include obtaining external
prices when possible and validating a substantial share of the portfolio against secondary pricing
sources when available.
FSP FAS 157-4 addresses measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and
transactions are not orderly. Transactions or quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be
determinative of fair value when transactions are not orderly and thus may require adjustments to
estimate fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157. Price quotes based on transactions that are
not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value. Price quotes based upon
transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value and the weight given is
based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not available to determine if price
quotes are based upon orderly transactions, less weight should be given to the price quote relative
to other transactions that are known to be orderly. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 in the second
quarter of 2009 did not have a significant impact on the Corporations financial condition or
results of operations.
There were no significant changes in the Corporations valuation methodologies as of June 30, 2009
when compared with December 31, 2008. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for
a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for the principal assets and
liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2009.
129
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporations portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale amounted to $7.7 billion and represented 97% of the Corporations assets from
continuing operations measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2009, net unrealized
gains on the trading and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $10
million and $53 million, respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporations trading and
investment securities available-for-sale are classified under the Level 2 category. Trading and
investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which are the securities that
involved the highest degree of judgment, represent only 4% of the Corporations total portfolio of
trading and investment securities available-for-sale.
Management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least on a
quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that
may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the
investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings,
economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees, and the ability to hold
the security until maturity or recovery. Any impairment that is considered other-than-temporary is
recorded directly in the statement of operations.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics
and market liquidity. At the end of each quarter, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for
each asset or liability measured. SFAS No. 157 quarterly analysis performed by the Corporation
includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and
level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.
Most of the Corporations investment securities available-for-sale are classified as Level 2 in the
fair value hierarchy given that the general investment strategy at the Corporation is principally
buy and hold with little trading activity. As such, the majority of the values are obtained from
third-party pricing service providers and, as indicated earlier, are validated with alternate
pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented
and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporations financial statements.
Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and
investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and
the secondary pricing source used as support to the valuation results.
Primary pricing sources were thoroughly evaluated for their consideration of current market
conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market, and if pricing methodology rely, to the
extent possible, on observable market and trade data. When a market quote for a specific security
is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit
price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To
the extent trading data is not available, the pricing provider relies on specific information,
including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established
benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the
characteristics of the evaluated instrument.
The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers are consistent with
general market convention. When trade data is not available, pricing service providers rely on
available market quotes and on their models. If for any reason, the pricing service provider cannot
observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, none of the Corporations investment securities were subject to pricing
discontinuance by the pricing service providers. Substantially all investment securities
available-for-sale are priced with primary pricing service providers and are validated by an
alternate pricing source with the exception of GNMA Puerto Rico Serials, which are priced using a
local demand price matrix prepared from local dealer quotes, and other local investments, such as
corporate securities, and local mutual funds priced by local dealers. During the quarter ended June
30, 2009, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or
broker dealers.
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and index options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are exchange-traded, such as futures and options,
or are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities
(TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified as Level
2. Valuations of
130
derivative assets and liabilities
reflect the value of the instrument including the values associated with counterparty risk and the
Corporations own credit standing. The non-performance risk is determined using
internally-developed models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term, and the
creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available public data or
internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability of default. To
manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing,
enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral.
The derivative assets include a $4.2 million negative adjustment as a result of the credit risk of
the counterparty as of June 30, 2009. On the other hand, derivative liabilities include a $1.2
million positive adjustment related to the incorporation of the Corporations own credit risk as of
June 30, 2009.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, which
include interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and
the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices
because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
The Corporation manages interest rate risk regularly through its Asset Liability Management
Committee. The Committee meets on a regular basis and reviews various asset and liability
management information, including but not limited to, the banks liquidity positions, projected
sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.
Interest rate risk (IRR), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a
predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. The
techniques for measuring the potential impact of the Corporations exposure to market risk from
changing interest rates that were described in the 2008 Annual Report were the same as those
applied by the Corporation as of June 30, 2009.
Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a
tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in future earnings resulting from
hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated on a monthly basis using
a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and
interest yields or costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected
changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates,
pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. Simulations
are processed using various interest rate scenarios to determine potential changes to the future
earnings of the Corporation.
Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that
management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these
forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur
in the future.
The Corporation usually runs its net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in
which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate
scenarios considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and
400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2010. Under a 200 basis points
rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $55.5 million, while under a 400
basis points rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increased by $114.2 million. These
scenarios were compared against the Corporations flat interest rates forecast. Given the fact that
as of June 30, 2009, some market interest rates were close to zero, management has focused on
measuring the risk on net interest income on rising rate scenarios.
131
The Corporation uses the economic value of equity (EVE) analysis to attempt to measure the
sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the
estimated present value of the Corporations assets minus the estimated present value of the
liabilities. It is a useful tool to measure long-term interest rate risk because it captures cash
flows from all future periods.
EVE is estimated on a monthly basis and shock scenarios are prepared on a quarterly basis. The
shock scenarios consist of +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. As previously mentioned, given the
low levels of current market rates, the Corporation will focus on measuring the risk in a rising
rate scenario. Minimum EVE ratio limits, expressed as EVE as a percentage of total assets, have
been established for base case and shock scenarios. In addition, management has also defined limits
for the increases / decreases in EVE resulting from the shock scenarios. As of June 30, 2009, the
Corporation was in compliance with these limits.
The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the
use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income
or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives
is subject to interest rate fluctuations and, as a result, could have a positive or negative effect
in the Corporations net interest income. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements
for further information on the Corporations derivative instruments.
The Corporation conducts business in certain Latin American markets through several of its
processing and information technology services and products subsidiaries. Also, it holds interests
in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. (BHD) in
the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these businesses are conducted in the
countrys foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment, from operations
for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, is reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of condition, except for
highly-inflationary environments in which the effects are included in other operating income in the
consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation
had approximately $40 million and $39 million, respectively, in an unfavorable foreign currency
translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
LIQUIDITY
For a financial institution, such as the Corporation, liquidity risk refers to the probability of
the institution not generating enough cash from either assets or liabilities to meet its
obligations when they become due, without incurring material losses. Cash requirements for a
financial institution are primarily made up of deposit withdrawals, contractual loan funding, the
repayment of borrowings as they mature and the ability to fund new and existing investments as
opportunities arise. An institutions liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating
is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event
causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is also exposed to
liquidity risk if markets on which it depends are subject to temporary disruptions. The objective
of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation remains sufficiently liquid to
meet all of its financial obligations; finance expected future growth and maintains a reasonable
safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions.
Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking
and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and non-banking
subsidiaries.
Capital and credit markets have experienced significant disruption and volatility since the second
half of 2007, although they have been improving in recent months as evidenced by the contraction in
credit spreads and increases in issuance volumes in the capital markets. Also, the myriad funding
programs introduced by the U.S. Government have been helpful in restoring more normal market
conditions. Disrupted market conditions have increased our liquidity risk exposure due primarily to
increased risk aversion on the part of traditional credit providers. While the Corporations
management has implemented various strategies to reduce that exposure, such as reducing
substantially our use of short-term unsecured borrowings, promoting customer deposit growth through
traditional banking and internet channels, diversifying and increasing its contingency funding
sources as well as exiting certain non-banking subsidiaries, a resurgence of substantial market
stress could negatively influence the availability of credit to us, as well as its cost.
132
Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits,
continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, totaling $26.9 billion,
and funding 74% of the Corporations total assets as of June 30, 2009.
In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. These
borrowings consisted primarily of FHLB borrowings, securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and term notes. Refer to Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements for the composition of the Corporations borrowings as of June
30, 2009. Also, refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the Corporations
involvement in certain commitments and guarantees as of June 30, 2009.
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase as of June 30, 2009
presented a reduction of $610 million compared with December 31, 2008, principally in repurchase
agreements which declined by $465 million. This decline was associated in part to the lower volume
of investment securities.
Other than as described above and the repayment of $798 million in term notes during the six months
ended June 30, 2009, there have been no significant changes in the Corporations aggregate
contractual obligations since the end of 2008.
The following sections provide further information on the Corporations major funding activities
and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities.
Banking Subsidiaries
Primary sources of funding for the Corporations banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or the
banking subsidiaries, include retail and commercial deposits, collateralized borrowings and, to a
lesser extent, loan sales. The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan
and investment portfolio growth, repayment of obligations as they become due, operational needs and
in the case of BPPR, dividend payments to the holding company. In addition, the Corporations
banking subsidiaries maintain borrowing facilities with the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB) and at
the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed), and have a considerable amount
of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities. Borrowings
from the FHLB or the Fed discount window require the Corporation to post securities or whole loans
as collateral. The banking subsidiaries must maintain their FHLB memberships to continue accessing
this source of funding.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits depends on
various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by
operating results and credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies). Although a
downgrade in the credit rating of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise deposits or the
rate it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be
material. Deposits at all of the Corporations banking subsidiaries are federally insured and this
is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in credit ratings. During the quarter, the
rating agencies downgraded the ratings of the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries. The impact
of the downgrades on our ability to attract and retain deposits has not been material to date.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB at
competitive prices. As of June 30, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term
credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating $2.0 billion based on assets pledged with
the FHLB at that date, compared with $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2008. Outstanding borrowings
under these credit facilities totaled $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Such
advances are collateralized by securities and mortgage and other loans, do not have restrictive
covenants and do not have any callable features. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
As of June 30, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window
of approximately $2.5 billion, which remained unused as of that date. This compares to a borrowing
capacity at the Fed discount window of $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2008, which was unused at
that date. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under
difficult market conditions. The amount available under this line is dependent upon the balance of
loans and securities pledged as collateral. The reduction in the borrowing capacity at the Fed
discount window from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was principally due to a market-wide
reduction by the Fed on the lendable values of certain types of deposited loans based on
assumptions
133
regarding their average risk characteristics, and an increase in delinquent loans.
As of June 30, 2009, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient liquidity to
meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.
Bank Holding Companies
The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment
securities, dividends paid by banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits),
asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from new
borrowings. The principal uses of these funds include the repayment of maturing debt, dividend
payments to shareholders and subsidiary funding through capital or debt.
Banking laws place certain restrictions on the amount of dividends a bank may make to its parent
company. As of June 30, 2009, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $77 million
without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. As of June 30, 2009, BPNA was required to obtain
the approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. The Corporation has never received
dividend payments from its U.S. mainland subsidiaries. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated
financial statements for information on the amount of dividends BPPR could have declared to its
parent company as of June 30, 2009 without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Due to
limitations resulting from lower earnings in 2009 in the Puerto Rico operations, management expects
that dividends from BPPR to the Corporations holding company will be significantly lower than
those received in previous years.
The Corporations bank holding companies (BHCs, Popular, Inc., Popular North America and Popular
International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and the corporate debt
market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. These sources of funding have become
more difficult to obtain and costly due to disrupted market conditions and the reductions in the
Corporations credit ratings. The cash needs of non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay
indebtedness are now minimal given that the PFH business was discontinued.
A principal use of liquidity at the BHC is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized.
Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary have required the BHCs to contribute capital to
ensure it meets regulatory guidelines for well-capitalized institutions. In the event that
additional capital contributions were necessary, management believes that the BHCs currently have
enough liquidity sources to meet potential capital needs from BPNA in the ordinary course of
business.
Given the weakened economy, current market conditions, and our recent credit rating downgrades,
which are described below, there is no assurance that the BHC will, if it chooses to do so, be able
to obtain new borrowings or additional equity from external investors. However, the BHCs liquidity
position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand or marketable securities easily
convertible to cash and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs
obligations due through 2010.
Risks to Liquidity
Capital and credit markets have experienced significant disruption and volatility since the second
half of 2007, although conditions in recent months have improved. Even though the Corporations
management has implemented various strategies to reduce that exposure, such as reducing our usage
of short-term unsecured borrowings, promoting customer deposit growth through traditional banking
and internet channels, diversifying and increasing its contingency funding sources as well as
exiting certain non banking subsidiaries, continued market stress could negatively influence the
availability of credit to us, as well as its cost.
Recent reductions of our credit ratings by the rating agencies could also affect our ability to
borrow funds, and could substantially raise the cost of our borrowings. Some of the Corporations
borrowings have rating triggers that call for an increase in their interest rate in the event of
a rating downgrade. In addition, changes in our ratings could lead creditors and business
counterparties to raise the collateral requirements, which could reduce our ability to raise
financing. Refer to Part II Other Information, Item 1A-Risk Factors for additional information.
The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that
could affect its financing activities. In the case of a further or deepening of the economic
recession in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be further affected and
result in higher credit costs. The substantial integration of Puerto
134
Rico with the U.S. mainland
economy may also complicate the impact of a recession in Puerto Rico, as the U.S. recession
underway, concurrently with a slowdown in Puerto Rico, may make a recovery in the local economic cycle more
challenging. This was experienced in 2008 and the first half of 2009 and is expected for the
foreseeable future. The economy in Puerto Rico is experiencing its fourth year of a recessionary
cycle.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for
the possibility of such a scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing
under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are
temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the
pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in
place with the FHLB and the Fed. The Corporation has a substantial amount of assets available for
raising funds through these channels.
Credit ratings of Populars debt obligations are an important factor for liquidity because they
impact the Corporations ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding
sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in
the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of
management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core
retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporations ability to access a broad array of wholesale
funding sources, among other factors. Credit ratings of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries
at a level below investment grade may affect the Corporations ability to raise funds in the
capital markets. The Corporations counterparties are sensitive to the risk of a rating downgrade.
As a result of the recent downgrades, the cost of borrowing funds in the institutional market is
expected to increase. In addition, the ability of the Corporation to raise new funds or renew
maturing debt may be more difficult.
The Corporations ratings and outlook as of June 30, 2009 are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
Long-term |
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
debt |
|
debt |
|
stock |
|
Outlook |
|
Fitch |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
Negative |
Moodys |
|
W/R |
|
Ba1 |
|
Ca |
|
Negative |
S&P |
|
B |
|
BB- |
|
C |
|
Negative |
|
W/R withdrawn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In their June 2009 reports, the three rating agencies downgraded the Corporations credit
ratings following the announcement of the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common stock
and Series A and Series B preferred stock, and of the exchange offer to raise common equity. The
S&Ps report indicated that these actions reflect increasing pressures on the companys capital
position, operating performance, and liquidity. Based on S&Ps report, the downgrade also reflects
expectations for continued bottom-line losses stemming from increased credit losses and the
associated pressures on capital ratios. If credit quality deteriorates beyond their expectations,
S&P could lower the ratings further. Moodys said the downgrades were prompted by increased credit
concerns and the challenges Popular faces in raising its planned amount of common equity. Moodys
also addressed in its report the asset quality challenges currently faced by Popular. Any of the
rating agencies could change their ratings of the Corporation or the ratings outlook at any time
without previous notice.
The Corporations debt and preferred stock ratings are currently rated non-investment grade by
the rating agencies. The market for non-investment grade securities is much smaller and less liquid
than for investment grade securities. Therefore, if the company were to attempt to issue preferred
stock or debt securities in the capital markets, it is possible that there would not be sufficient
demand to complete a transaction and the cost could be substantially higher than for more highly
rated securities.
135
The banking subsidiaries do not use unsecured capital market borrowings to finance its operations,
and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in the Corporations overall credit
ratings. Their main funding sources are deposits and secured borrowings. At the BHCs, the volume of
capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the nonbanking lending businesses it had
historically funded have been shut down and outstanding unsecured senior debt has been paid down.
The Corporation has $350 million in senior debt issued by the bank holding companies with interest
that adjusts in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. As a result of rating downgrades
affected by the rating agencies during the second quarter of 2009, the cost of this senior debt
increased prospectively by 225 basis points, which represents an increase in the annual interest
expense on the particular debt of approximately $7.9 million. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for details on the terms of this senior debt. This debt was also adjusted by
50 basis points in January 2009 when the three rating agencies announced downgrades in Populars
senior debt ratings. No other outstanding borrowings have rate or maturity triggers associated with
credit ratings. The Corporations banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are
rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with
deposits and secured borrowings.
Some of the Corporations derivative instruments include ratings triggers that permit
counterparties to either request additional collateral or terminate the agreements with them based
on credit ratings. The fair value of derivative positions (a liability position) subject to rating
triggers that could accelerate their maturity was approximately $72 million as of June 30, 2009.
None of the derivative agreements impacted by the rating downgrades were terminated by the
counterparties as of June 30, 2009. The Corporation has provided collateral as required to cover
net liability positions with counterparties.
In addition, servicing and custodial agreements that the Corporation is party to with third
parties, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, include ratings covenants.
Servicing rights represent a contractual right and not a beneficial ownership interest in the
underlying mortgage loans. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contract requirements
may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. Based on
the Corporations failure to maintain an investment grade rating, those third parties have the
right to require the Corporation to increase collateral levels, engage a substitute custodian
and/or terminate their agreements with the Corporation. The termination of those agreements or the
inability to realize servicing income for the Corporations businesses could have an adverse effect
on those businesses. The Corporation has adequate collateral to meet any existing collateral
requirements thus far and expects that it would be able to meet the requirements of the
counterparties.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter ended on June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
136
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of
these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early stages and management
cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and August 10, 2009, five putative class actions and one derivative claim were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, against Popular, Inc.
and certain of its directors and officers. Two of the class actions (Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al.
and Otero v. Popular, Inc., et al.) purport to be on behalf of purchasers of our securities between
January 23, 2008 and January 22, 2009 and allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by
issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading. The Otero action
also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and Section 15 of the
Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose material facts
necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading in connection with the offering of
the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. These securities class action complaints seek class
certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, including
counsel fees. These two actions have now been consolidated. The remaining class actions (Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montanez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.)
purport to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and
Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan between January 23,
2008 and the dates of the complaints to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409, 502(a)(2) and
502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against the Corporation, certain
directors, officers and members of plan committees, each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary.
The complaints allege that the defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among
other things, failing to eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The
complaints seek to recover alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive
relief and a constructive trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. These ERISA actions have now
been consolidated. The derivative claim (Garcia v. Carrion, et al.) is brought purportedly for the
benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers and directors and
alleges breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in connection with our
issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial reports and the
offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaint seeks a judgment that the action
is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and disbursements,
including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed under Part IItem 1ARisk Factors in our 2008 Form 10-K, as supplemented
and updated by the discussion below. These factors could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our
actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in
Part IItem 2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in this report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion
of risk factors in our 2008 Form 10-K.
The risks described in our 2008 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
137
====================================================================================================================================
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
Our financial results for the second quarter and our financial condition continued to be affected
by the deterioration in the credit quality of our portfolio and economic conditions affecting the
markets in which we operate.
The credit quality of our portfolio continues to deteriorate and had an adverse effect on our
financial results for the period ended June 30, 2009 and our financial condition as of June 30,
2009. Continued adverse changes in the economy and negative trends in employment and property
values in the markets in which we operate, which are described more fully below, continue to have
an adverse effect on our provision for loan losses. We will continue to evaluate our allowance for
loan losses and may be required to increase such amounts, perhaps substantially.
Among other factors, an increase in our allowance for loan losses would result in a reduction in
the amount of our tangible common equity. Given the focus on tangible common equity by regulatory
authorities, rating agencies and the market, we may be required to raise additional capital through
the issuance of additional common stock in future periods to replace that common equity. An
increase in our capital through an issuance of Common Stock in our current Exchange Offer could
have a dilutive effect on the existing holders of our Common Stock, including holders receiving
Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, and adversely affect its market price.
During the first and second quarters of 2009, our overall credit quality continued to be affected
by the sustained deterioration of the economic conditions affecting our markets, including higher
unemployment levels, unprecedented reduced absorption rates of new housing units and declines in
property values.
As set forth under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
ConditionNon-Performing Assets in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, our credit
quality performance has continued to be under pressure during 2009 with economic concerns including
higher unemployment levels, unprecedented reduced absorption rates of new housing units and
declines in property values. Non-performing assets increased by $791 million at June 30, 2009 as
compared to December 31, 2008 and by $1.1 billion as compared to June 30, 2008. The allowance for
loan losses of $1.1 billion at June 30, 2009 was 4.66% of period-end loans held-in-portfolio, as
compared to 3.43% of period-end loans held-in-portfolio on December 31, 2008 and 2.47% of
period-end loans held-in-portfolio on June 30, 2008.
The main factor driving our net losses in the first two quarters of 2009 has been the increasing
credit costs from several segments of our loan portfolio. Persistent adverse changes in the economy
and negative trends in employment levels and property values in the markets in which we operate
have continued to negatively affect our provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2009.
The existing adverse economic conditions are expected to persist at least through 2009, thus it is
likely that we will continue to experience heightened credit losses, additional significant
provisions for loan losses, an increased allowance for loan losses and higher levels of
non-performing assets.
The imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico may further deteriorate the
Corporations commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios.
On March 9, 2009 the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Special Act Declaring a State of
Fiscal Emergency and Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save Puerto Ricos
Credit, Act No. 7 (the Act). The Act, as amended, imposes a series of temporary and permanent
measures, including the imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to properties used for
residential (excluding those exempt as detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to
the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. The 0.591% will be computed based on the taxable value of such properties for purposes of the Centro de Recaudacion de Ingresos
Municipales (CRIM). This temporary measure will be effective for tax years that
commenced after June 30, 2009 and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special property tax
could adversely affect the disposable income of borrowers from the commercial, consumer and
mortgage loan portfolios and may cause an increase in the Corporations delinquency and
foreclosures rates.
Our business depends on the creditworthiness of our customers and the value of the assets securing
our loans.
If the credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or if the risk profile of a market,
industry or group of customers changes materially, our business, financial condition, allowance
levels, liquidity, capital and results of operations could be adversely affected. While we believe
that our allowance for loan losses was adequate at June 30, 2009, there is no certainty that it
will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the portfolio because of continued
138
adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events negatively affecting specific
customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and the United States. We periodically review
the allowance for loan losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral
values and credit quality indicators, including past charge-off experience and levels of past due
loans and non-performing assets.
Recent actions by the rating agencies have raised the cost of our borrowings, which could affect
our ability to borrow in the future and may have other adverse effects on our business.
Recent actions by the rating agencies have raised the cost of our borrowings. Borrowings amounting
to $350 million have ratings triggers that call for an increase in their interest rate in the
event of a ratings downgrade. For example, as a result of rating downgrades effected by the major
rating agencies in April and June 2009, the cost of servicing $350 million of our senior debt
increased by an additional 225 basis points.
The Corporations debt and preferred stock ratings are currently rated non-investment grade by
the rating agencies. The market for non-investment grade securities is much smaller and less liquid
than for investment grade securities. Therefore, if we were to attempt to issue preferred stock or
debt securities in the capital markets, it is possible that there would not be sufficient demand to
complete a transaction and the cost could be substantially higher than for more highly rated
securities.
In addition, changes in our ratings have affected and could continue to affect our relationships
with some creditors and business counterparties. For example, many of our hedging transactions
include ratings triggers that permit counterparties to either request additional collateral or
terminate our agreements with them based on our below investment grade ratings. Although we have
been able to meet any additional collateral requirements thus far and expect that we would be able
to enter into agreements with substitute counterparties if any of our existing agreements were
terminated, changes in our hedging transactions could create additional costs for our businesses.
In addition, servicing and custodial agreements that we are party to with third parties, including
the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, include ratings covenants. Servicing rights
represent a contractual right and not a beneficial ownership interest in the underlying mortgage
loans. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contract requirements may lead to a
termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. Based on our failure to
maintain an investment grade rating, those third parties have the right to require us to increase
collateral levels, engage a substitute custodian and/or terminate their agreements with us. The
termination of those agreements or the inability to realize servicing income for our businesses
could have an adverse effect on those businesses. Other counterparties are also sensitive to the
risk of a ratings downgrade and the implications for our businesses and may be less likely to
engage in transactions with us, or may only engage in them at a substantially higher cost, if our
ratings remain below investment grade.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future to address the current liquidity and
credit crisis in the financial industry may significantly affect our financial condition, results
of operations, liquidity or stock price.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government
regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial
services industry. The U.S. Government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what
has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis. In addition to the U.S. Treasury
Departments Capital Purchase Program (CPP) under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
announced last fall and the new Capital Assistance Program (CAP) announced this spring, further
steps taken include enhancing the liquidity support available to financial institutions,
establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances, and increasing insurance on bank deposits. Also, the U.S.
Congress, through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, have imposed a number of restrictions and limitations on the operations
of financial services firms participating in the federal programs. Most recently, on June 17, 2009,
the Administration released a financial regulatory reform plan that would, if enacted, represent
the most sweeping reform of financial regulation and financial services since the 1930s.
These programs and proposals subject us and other financial institutions to additional
restrictions, oversight and costs that may have an adverse impact on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or the price of our Common Stock. The Administrations financial
reform plan would, if enacted, further substantially increase regulation of the financial services
industry and impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms
139
within the industry to
conduct business consistent with historical practices. Federal and state regulatory agencies also
frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations
are applied. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation, regulation
or the application thereof. Compliance with such current and potential regulation and scrutiny may
significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require
us to increase our regulatory capital and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an
efficient manner.
Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse affect on the Corporations
earnings.
During 2008 and continuing in 2009, higher levels of bank failures have dramatically increased
resolution costs of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and depleted the deposit
insurance fund. In addition, the FDIC instituted two temporary programs effective through
December 31, 2009, to further insure customer deposits at FDIC-member banks: deposit accounts are
now insured up to $250,000 per customer (up from $100,000) and non-interest bearing transactional
accounts are fully insured (unlimited coverage). These programs have placed additional stress on
the deposit insurance fund.
In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance
fund, the FDIC increased assessment rates of insured institutions uniformly by 7 cents for every
$100 of deposits beginning with the first quarter of 2009, with additional changes beginning
April 1, 2009, which require riskier institutions to pay a larger share of premiums by factoring in
rate adjustments based on secured liabilities and unsecured debt levels. In February 2009, the FDIC
voted to amend the restoration plan and impose a special assessment of 20 cents for every $100 of
assessable deposits on insured institutions on June 30, 2009, which would be collected on
September 30, 2009. In May 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule, effective June 30, 2009, that will
impose a special assessment of 5 cents for every $100 on each insured depository institutions
assets minus its Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a cap equal to 10 cents per $100 of
assessable deposits for the second quarter 2009 risk-based capital assessment. This special
assessment will apply to us and resulted in a $16.7 million expense in our second quarter of 2009.
We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC
insurance. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures or our capital position
is further impaired, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently
increased levels. Our expenses for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 were significantly and
adversely affected by these increased premiums. These announced increases and any future increases
in FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Weakness in the economy and in the real estate market in the geographic footprint of Popular has
adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact Popular.
A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the Island) and the Islands economy has been deteriorating.
This decline in the Islands economy has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in our loan
originations; an increase in the level of our non-performing assets, loan loss provisions and
charge-offs, particularly in our construction loan portfolio; an increase in the rate of
foreclosure loss on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value of our loans and loan servicing
portfolio, all of which have adversely affected our profitability. If the decline in economic
activity continues, there could be further adverse effects on our profitability.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government is currently facing a fiscal deficit which has been
estimated at approximately $3.0 billion or over 30% of its annual budget. It continues to review
alternatives for reducing the deficit, as its access to the municipal bond market and its credit
ratings depend, in part, on achieving a balanced budget. Measures that the government has
implemented have included reducing expenses, including public-sector employment through layoffs of
employees. It has been reported that the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government could layoff as
many as 30,000 employees, with approximately 8,000 employee layoffs taking place in early June
2009. Since the government is an important source of employment on the Island, these measures could
have the effect of intensifying the current recessionary cycle.
The economy of Puerto Rico is sensitive to the price of oil in the global market. The Island does
not have significant mass transit available to the public and most of its electricity is powered by
oil, making it highly sensitive to fluctuations in oil prices. A substantial increase in its price
could impact adversely the economy of Puerto Rico, by
140
reducing disposable income and increasing the
operating costs of most businesses and government. Consumer spending is particularly sensitive to
wide fluctuations in oil prices.
The level of real estate prices in Puerto Rico have historically been more stable than in other
U.S. markets, but the current economic environment and future developments in Puerto Rico and the
mainland U.S. could further pressure residential property values. Lower real estate values could
increase loan delinquencies, foreclosures and the cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate
collateral.
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has had an
adverse effect on the credit quality of our loan portfolios. The continuation of the economic
slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase in the
short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may
also impact growth in our other interest and non-interest revenue sources.
RISKS RELATED TO THE FUTURE ISSUANCE OF A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND DILUTION OF
HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Additional assistance from the U.S. Government may further dilute existing holders of our Common
Stock, including participants in the Exchange Offer.
In December 2008, Popular issued approximately $935 million in shares of cumulative preferred stock
together with a warrant to purchase up to approximately 21 million shares of our Common Stock at an
exercise price of $6.70 per share to the United States Treasury (U.S. Treasury). The current
Exchange Offer does not involve any additional investment in Popular by the U.S. Treasury or the
U.S. Government. Notwithstanding that, there may be new regulatory requirements or standards or
additional U.S. Government programs or requirements or losses in the future that could result in,
or require, additional equity issuances. Such further equity issuances would further dilute the
existing holders of our Common Stock (including participants in the current Exchange Offer) perhaps
significantly.
Although not currently contemplated, we could obtain Tier 1 common equity by exchanging (with the
approval of the U.S. Treasury) a number of shares of the Series C Preferred Stock we issued to the
U.S. Treasury under the CPP (or New Trust Preferred Securities that
we issue in exchange for those shares of Series C Preferred Stock) for shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock issued under the
CAP or for Common Stock or another common equivalent security that the U.S. Treasury otherwise
agrees to purchase, directly or indirectly. Such an exchange could also involve the issuance of
additional warrants to the U.S. Treasury to purchase additional shares of our common stock as
contemplated by the published terms of the CAP. The issuance of additional shares of our Common
Stock or common equivalent securities in future equity offerings, to the U.S. Treasury under the
CAP or otherwise, or as a result of the exercise of the warrant the U.S. Treasury holds, will
dilute the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders and could also involve U.S.
Government constraints on our operations.
Additional issuances of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock may further dilute
existing holders of our Common Stock.
We may determine that it is advisable, or we may encounter circumstances where we determine it is
necessary, to issue additional shares of our Common Stock, securities convertible into or
exchangeable for shares of our Common Stock, or common-equivalent securities to fund strategic
initiatives or other business needs or to build additional capital. Depending on our capital needs,
we may make such a determination in the near future or in subsequent periods. The market price of
our Common Stock could decline as a result of this offering or other offerings, as well as other
sales of a large block of shares of our Common Stock or similar securities in the market
thereafter, or the perception that such sales could occur. We may need to increase our authorized
capital in order to raise such equity capital.
If holders of our Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities do not participate in the current
Exchange Offer in sufficient amounts in the near future, we may have to increase our Tier 1 common
equity through other means, including through asset sales or by raising capital privately or
issuing mandatory convertible preferred stock and related warrants to the U.S. Treasury, which
could further dilute the existing holders of our Common Stock, including participants in the
Exchange Offer.
In addition, such additional equity issuances would reduce any earnings available to the holders of
our Common Stock and the return thereon unless our earnings increase correspondingly. We cannot
predict the timing or size of future equity issuances, if any, or the effect that they may have on
the market price of our Common Stock. The issuance of substantial amounts of equity, or the
perception that such issuances may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our Common
Stock.
141
The market price of our Common Stock may be subject to continued significant fluctuations and
volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market fluctuations
have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of our Common
Stock. In addition, the market price of our Common Stock has been subject to significant
fluctuations and volatility because of factors specifically related to our businesses and may
continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause fluctuations, volatility or
further decline in the market price of our Common Stock, many of which could be beyond our control,
include the following:
|
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of our
businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes; |
|
|
|
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by us or
our competitors; |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or
proposals, affecting us, including those relating to the current financial crisis and
global economic downturn and those that may be specifically directed to us; |
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and
economic conditions in our principal markets; |
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel; |
|
|
|
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets; |
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and
investors; |
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us;
and |
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the current Exchange Offer will be
consummated. |
The Exchange Offer will result in a substantial amount of our Common Stock entering the market,
which could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
As of June 30, 2009, we had approximately 282 million shares of our Common Stock outstanding.
Following consummation of the Exchange Offer, assuming the Exchange Offer is fully subscribed, this
figure will increase to approximately 672 million shares of our Common Stock. The issuance of such
a large number of shares of our Common Stock in such a short period of time will significantly
reduce earnings per common share and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
The price of our Common Stock is depressed and may not recover.
The price of our Common Stock has declined significantly from a closing price of $13.02 on May 1,
2008, to a closing price of $1.36 on August 7, 2009. Our stock price may never recover to prior
levels or to any particular level.
142
Dividends on our Common Stock have been suspended and you may not receive funds in connection with
your investment in our Common Stock without selling your shares of our Common Stock.
Holders of our Common Stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors
may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We have announced the suspension of
dividend payments on our Common Stock and Preferred Stock. As a consequence, we will be unable to
pay dividends on our Common Stock unless and until
we resume payments of dividends on our Preferred Stock. Furthermore, prior to December 5, 2011,
unless we have redeemed all of the Series C Preferred Stock (or any successor security) or the U.S.
Treasury has transferred all of the Series C Preferred Stock (or any successor security) to third
parties, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be required for us to, among other things, increase
the dividend rate per share of Common Stock above $0.08 per share or to repurchase or redeem equity
securities, including our Common Stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could adversely
affect the market price of our Common Stock. Also, we are a bank holding company and our ability to
declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the
guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal
Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that the bank holding companies and
insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current
financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies
should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are
at the 100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
In addition, the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by each Trust
that has issued Trust Preferred Securities prohibit us from declaring or paying any dividends or
distributions on our capital stock, including our Common Stock, or purchasing, acquiring, or making
a liquidation payment on such stock, if we have given notice of our election to defer interest
payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.
Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your shares of our Common Stock in order to
generate cash flow from your investment. You may not realize a gain on your investment when you
sell the Common Stock and may lose the entire amount of your investment.
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to our Common Stock upon liquidation, and/or preferred
equity securities, which may be senior to our Common Stock for purposes of dividend distributions
or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
We may attempt to increase our capital resources or, if our or the capital ratios of our banking
subsidiaries fall below the required minimums, we or our banking subsidiaries could be forced to
raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities,
including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred
stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders
with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the
holders of our Common Stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing
stockholders or reduce the market price of our Common Stock, or both. Our board of directors is
authorized to waive the preemptive rights otherwise provided in our Certificate of Incorporation.
Our board of directors is authorized to issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock from
time to time without any action on the part of the stockholders. Our board of directors also has
the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of
preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over
our Common Stock with respect to dividends or upon our dissolution, winding up and liquidation and
other terms. If we issue preferred shares in the future that have a preference over our Common
Stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if we issue preferred shares
with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the Common Stock, the rights of holders of our
Common Stock or the market price of our Common Stock could be adversely affected.
143
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock issuable under this Plan is 10,000,000.
The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly |
|
that May Yet be Purchased |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
Under the Plans or Programs (a) |
|
April 1 April 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,568,931 |
|
May 1 May 31
|
|
|
185,312 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
185,312 |
|
|
|
8,441,584 |
|
June 1 June 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,440,932 |
|
|
Total June 30, 2009
|
|
|
185,312 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
185,312 |
|
|
|
8,440,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares forfeited. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Popular, Inc. was held on May 1, 2009. A quorum was obtained
with 249,316,823 shares represented in person or by proxy, which represented approximately 88.39%
of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting.
The matters submitted to a vote of security holders and the results of the voting on each of the
proposals are set forth below.
Proposal 1: To elect three (3) directors assigned to Class 1 of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation for a three-year term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Juan J. Bermúdez |
|
|
219,520,103 |
|
|
|
29,796,720 |
|
Richard L. Carrión |
|
|
217,873,421 |
|
|
|
31,443,402 |
|
Francisco M. Rexach Jr. |
|
|
203,249,729 |
|
|
|
46,067,094 |
|
The following directors were not up for reelection and continued to hold office after the meeting:
Michael J. Masin, Manuel Morales Jr., José R. Vizcarrondo, María Luisa Ferré, Frederic V. Salerno
and William J. Teuber Jr.
Proposal 2: To amend Article Fifth of the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized
number of shares of common stock, par value $6 per share, from 470,000,000 to 700,000,000:
|
|
|
|
|
In favor: |
|
|
223,787,355 |
|
Against: |
|
|
22,155,988 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
3,373,479 |
|
Proposal 3: To amend Article Fifth of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation to
decrease the par value of the Common Stock of the Corporation from $6 per share to $0.01 per share:
|
|
|
|
|
In favor: |
|
|
222,022,388 |
|
Against: |
|
|
22,088,300 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
5,206,133 |
|
144
Proposal 4: To provide an advisory vote related to the Corporations executive compensation program:
|
|
|
|
|
In favor: |
|
|
233,198,966 |
|
Against: |
|
|
11,563,888 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
4,253,969 |
|
Proposal 5: To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporations independent
registered public accounting firm for 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
In favor: |
|
|
237,580,685 |
|
Against: |
|
|
8,808,538 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
2,927,599 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
145
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 10, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jorge A. Junquera
|
|
|
|
Jorge A. Junquera |
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo
|
|
|
|
Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller |
|
|
146