e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 5, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-10317
LSI CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2712976 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(408) 433-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 6, 2009, there were 651,914,731 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par
value, outstanding.
LSI CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended July 5, 2009
INDEX
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words
estimate, plan, intend, expect, anticipate, believe and similar words are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe our expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. We have described in Part II, Item 1A- Risk Factors a number of factors that could
cause our actual results to differ from our projections or estimates. Except where otherwise
indicated, the statements made in this report are made as of the date we filed this report with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. We
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the information in this report, except as may otherwise
be required by law.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LSI CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
654,954 |
|
|
$ |
829,301 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
218,679 |
|
|
|
289,841 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $6,711 and $9,627, respectively |
|
|
267,917 |
|
|
|
303,971 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
158,658 |
|
|
|
220,535 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
140,466 |
|
|
|
155,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,440,674 |
|
|
|
1,799,462 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
217,541 |
|
|
|
235,963 |
|
Identified intangible assets, net |
|
|
809,294 |
|
|
|
889,995 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
179,212 |
|
|
|
175,624 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
235,596 |
|
|
|
243,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,882,317 |
|
|
$ |
3,344,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
145,714 |
|
|
$ |
201,035 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
82,004 |
|
|
|
114,730 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
236,416 |
|
|
|
236,661 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
245,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
814,134 |
|
|
|
797,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Pension, postretirement and other benefits |
|
|
444,458 |
|
|
|
451,079 |
|
Income taxes payable non-current |
|
|
198,099 |
|
|
|
193,590 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
108,201 |
|
|
|
111,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
750,758 |
|
|
|
1,105,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: 2,000 shares authorized; none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value: 1,300,000 shares authorized; 651,406 and
648,132 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
6,105,249 |
|
|
|
6,058,786 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,525,805 |
) |
|
|
(4,360,775 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(268,533 |
) |
|
|
(263,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,317,425 |
|
|
|
1,440,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,882,317 |
|
|
$ |
3,344,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
LSI CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
520,665 |
|
|
$ |
692,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,944 |
|
|
$ |
1,352,810 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
339,772 |
|
|
|
407,167 |
|
|
|
651,979 |
|
|
|
808,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
180,893 |
|
|
|
284,896 |
|
|
|
350,965 |
|
|
|
544,449 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
148,919 |
|
|
|
170,115 |
|
|
|
304,203 |
|
|
|
339,832 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
81,727 |
|
|
|
104,470 |
|
|
|
165,484 |
|
|
|
203,523 |
|
Restructuring of operations and other items, net |
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
20,719 |
|
|
|
31,215 |
|
|
|
25,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(55,763 |
) |
|
|
(10,408 |
) |
|
|
(149,937 |
) |
|
|
(24,189 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,864 |
) |
|
|
(8,959 |
) |
|
|
(14,100 |
) |
|
|
(17,937 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
12,207 |
|
|
|
22,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(56,283 |
) |
|
|
(11,147 |
) |
|
|
(151,830 |
) |
|
|
(19,275 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(61,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,647 |
) |
|
$ |
(165,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
650,300 |
|
|
|
639,872 |
|
|
|
649,360 |
|
|
|
650,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
650,300 |
|
|
|
639,872 |
|
|
|
649,360 |
|
|
|
650,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
LSI CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(165,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
131,318 |
|
|
|
157,618 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
34,992 |
|
|
|
37,442 |
|
Non-cash restructuring of operations and other items, net |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3,245 |
) |
Gain on redemption of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write-down of debt and equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
Loss/(gain) on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Non-cash foreign exchange (gain)/loss |
|
|
(8,116 |
) |
|
|
5,049 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
4,129 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in business combination: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
36,054 |
|
|
|
47,019 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
73,582 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
43,458 |
|
|
|
(9,592 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(53,388 |
) |
|
|
(50,808 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(33,753 |
) |
|
|
(39,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
59,065 |
|
|
|
123,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(106,632 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
63,945 |
|
|
|
93,203 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
|
(48,601 |
) |
|
|
(67,855 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
Acquisition of businesses and companies, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(20,840 |
) |
|
|
(95,137 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in non-current assets and deposits |
|
|
13,501 |
|
|
|
(13,300 |
) |
Proceeds received from the resolution of a pre-acquisition income tax contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
(177,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
(244,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
29,549 |
|
Purchases of common stock under repurchase programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(237,374 |
) |
|
|
(199,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(174,347 |
) |
|
|
(252,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
829,301 |
|
|
|
1,021,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
654,954 |
|
|
$ |
769,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
LSI CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
For financial reporting purposes, LSI Corporation (LSI or the Company) reports on a 13- or
14-week quarter with a year ending December 31. The current quarter ended July 5, 2009. The second
quarter of 2008 ended June 29, 2008. The results of operations for the quarter ended July 5, 2009
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The first six
months of 2009 and 2008 consisted of approximately 26 weeks each. The second quarter in each of
2009 and 2008 consisted of 13 weeks.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates.
In managements opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain
all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and restructuring of operations
and other items, net, as discussed in Note 3), necessary to state fairly the financial information
included herein. While the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information not misleading, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements not yet Effective:
In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position
(FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1 (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit
Plan Assets. This FSP amends FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
132(R) (FAS 132(R)) to provide guidance on an employers disclosure about plan assets of a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The additional required disclosures focus on
fair value by category of plan assets including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding
of investment policies and strategies. The FSP is effective for annual periods ending after
December 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will not have any impact on the Companys
results of operations or financial position.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 (FAS 168), The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. FAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162 and establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles recognized by FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities. Rules
and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. FAS 168 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. The adoption of FAS 168 will not have any impact on the Companys results of operations or
financial position.
Pronouncements Adopted during the Second Quarter of 2009:
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other Than Temporary Impairments. This FSP is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing
of impairment recognition, and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit
components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. This FSP also requires
increased and more timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of
securities with unrealized losses. This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this FSP during the second quarter of 2009, and the
adoption had no material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP requires disclosures of fair value for any financial
instruments not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value for all interim periods.
This FSP is effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company adopted this FSP during the second quarter of 2009, and the adoption had no
material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This FSP provides guidance on how to determine the fair value
of assets and liabilities when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used
represent distressed sales. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a
formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become
inactive. This FSP is effective prospectively for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company adopted this FSP in the second quarter of 2009, and the adoption had no material
impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 (FAS 165), Subsequent Events. FAS 165
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. FAS
165 requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, as
well as whether the date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial
statements were available to be issued. FAS 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FAS 165 in the second quarter of 2009, and the adoption
did not have any impact on its results of operations or financial position.
Note 2 Stock-Based Compensation
On March 31, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company adopted
an amendment to the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) to increase the maximum number
of shares that a participant can purchase in a single purchase period from 1,000 shares to 2,000
shares. The increase will be effective November 15, 2009.
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to the Companys stock
options, ESPP and restricted stock unit awards for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and
June 29, 2008. Stock-based compensation costs capitalized to inventory and software for the three
and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008 were not significant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense Included In: |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
4,633 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
|
7,569 |
|
|
|
15,057 |
|
|
|
15,392 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
9,506 |
|
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
17,002 |
|
|
$ |
19,647 |
|
|
$ |
34,992 |
|
|
$ |
37,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of stock-based awards, less expected forfeitures, is amortized over
each awards vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Stock Options
The fair value of each option grant is estimated as of the date of grant using a reduced form
calibrated binominal lattice model (the lattice model). This model requires the use of historical
data for employee exercise behavior and the use of the assumptions outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
Weighted average estimated grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
Weighted average assumptions in calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the lattice model. The
expected life of employee stock options is affected by all of the underlying assumptions and
calibration of the Companys model.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates of constant
maturity U.S. Treasury securities appropriate for the term of the Companys employee stock options.
7
The Company used an equally weighted combination of historical and implied volatilities as of
the grant date. The historical volatility is the standard deviation of the daily stock returns for
LSI from the date of the initial public offering of its common stock in
1983. For the implied volatilities, the Company uses near-the-money exchange-traded call
options, as stock options are call options that are granted at-the-money. The historical and
implied volatilities are annualized and equally weighted to determine the volatilities as of the
grant date. Management believes that the equally weighted combination of historical and implied
volatilities is more representative of future stock price trends than sole use of historical or
implied volatilities.
The lattice model assumes that employees exercise behavior is a function of the options
remaining vested life and the extent to which the option is in-the-money. The lattice model
estimates the probability of exercise as a function of these two variables based on the entire
history of exercises and cancellations for all past option grants made by the Company since its
initial public offering.
Because stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to
vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.
The following table summarizes changes in stock options outstanding during the six months
ended July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price Per
Share |
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term |
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
85,113 |
|
|
$ |
12.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(7,447 |
) |
|
|
(13.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at July 5, 2009 |
|
|
98,826 |
|
|
$ |
10.52 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
$ |
37,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at July 5, 2009 |
|
|
52,665 |
|
|
$ |
15.21 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 5, 2009, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock
options, net of estimated forfeitures, was $78.2 million and is expected to be recognized over the
next 2.8 years on a weighted average basis. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during
the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 was $1 thousand and $6 thousand, respectively. Cash
received from stock option exercises was $20 thousand and $21 thousand for the three and six months
ended July 5, 2009, respectively.
The Companys determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as a number of
highly complex and subjective assumptions. The Company uses third-party consultants to assist in
developing the assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, the lattice model. The Company is
responsible for determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its share-based
payment awards.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Compensation expense for the Companys ESPP is calculated using the fair value of the
employees purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model. A total of 2.5 million shares and 2.2
million shares were issued under the ESPP during the three months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29,
2008, respectively. The following table summarizes the assumptions that went into the calculation
of the fair value for the May 2009 and May 2008 grants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
Weighted average estimated grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
Weighted average assumptions in calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The cost of restricted stock unit awards is determined using the fair value of the Companys
common stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes changes in restricted stock units
outstanding during the six months ended July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Non-vested restricted stock units at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
6,391 |
|
Granted |
|
|
76 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units at July 5, 2009 |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
As of July 5, 2009, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock
units, net of estimated forfeitures, was $23.7 million and is expected to be recognized over the
next 1.2 years on a weighted average basis. The fair value of shares vested during the three and
six months ended July 5, 2009 was $0.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Note 3 Restructuring of Operations and Other Items
The Company recorded a charge of $6.0 million in restructuring of operations and other items,
net, for the three months ended July 5, 2009. Of this charge, $4.5 million and $1.5 million were
recorded in the Semiconductor segment and Storage Systems segment, respectively. The Company
recorded a charge of $31.2 million in restructuring of operations and other items, net, for the six
months ended July 5, 2009, consisting of $25.0 million in charges for restructuring of operations
and $6.2 million in charges for other items. Of this charge, $29.7 million and $1.5 million were
recorded in the Semiconductor segment and Storage Systems segment, respectively. For a complete
discussion of the 2008 restructuring actions, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Restructuring
First Quarter of 2009:
The $19.3 million charge was the result of the following:
|
|
|
A charge of $14.0 million primarily related to an accrual for remaining payments to be
made under a licensing arrangement for design tools that will no longer be used by the
Company; |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $4.5 million for severance and termination benefits for employees; and |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $0.8 million primarily for the change in time value of accruals for
previously accrued facility lease exit costs. |
Second Quarter of 2009:
The $5.7 million charge was the result of the following:
|
|
|
A charge of $4.5 million for severance and termination benefits for employees; and |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $1.2 million primarily for the change in time value of accruals for
previously accrued facility lease exit costs. |
Restructuring reserves are included within other accrued liabilities and other non-current
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the activities
affecting the restructuring accruals since December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
During |
|
|
During |
|
|
April 5, |
|
|
During |
|
|
During |
|
|
July 5, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Q2 2009 |
|
|
Q2 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Write-down of excess assets and
other liabilities |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Lease terminations (a) |
|
|
44,555 |
|
|
|
14,878 |
|
|
|
(10,323 |
) |
|
|
49,110 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
49,016 |
|
Payments to employees for severance (b) |
|
|
28,031 |
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
(17,347 |
) |
|
|
15,202 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
(7,374 |
) |
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
72,669 |
|
|
$ |
19,313 |
|
|
$ |
(27,670 |
) |
|
$ |
64,312 |
|
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
$ |
(8,626 |
) |
|
$ |
61,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amount utilized represents cash payments. The balance remaining for the termination of
real estate leases and other is expected to be paid during the remaining terms of the leases,
which extend through 2013. |
|
(b) |
|
The majority of the balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the end of
2009. |
9
Other Items
The Company recorded a net charge of $6.2 million for other items for the six months
ended July 5, 2009, primarily related to litigation costs.
Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale are included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets
in the balance sheets as of July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As of July 5, 2009 and December 31,
2008, assets held for sale were $19.1 million and $17.3 million, respectively, which primarily
consisted of $16.8 million related to land in Gresham, Oregon.
Assets classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair
value less cost to sell and are not depreciated. The Company reassesses its ability to realize the
carrying value of these assets at the end of each reporting period until the assets are sold or
otherwise disposed of and, therefore, additional adjustments may be necessary.
Note 4 Business Combinations
On April 21, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets and certain associated
intellectual property of the 3ware RAID storage adapter business of Applied Micro Circuits
Corporation. 3ware products include SAS and SATA RAID adapters and high-capacity storage solutions
for a broad range of applications. The acquisition was intended to enhance the Companys
competitive position in host bus RAID adapter solutions for distributors and system builders. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. For reporting purposes, the 3ware
business is included as part of the Storage Systems segment.
The following table summarizes information about this acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity Name or Type of Technology; |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
Segment Included in; |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Type of |
|
Tangible |
|
Identified |
|
|
Description of Acquired Business |
|
Acquisition Date |
|
Consideration |
|
Consideration |
|
Assets |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3ware RAID storage adapter
business; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Systems segment;
Host bus
RAID adapters and storage solutions |
|
April 21, 2009 |
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
The goodwill of $3.6 million represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value
of the net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired. All of this goodwill was assigned to
the Storage Systems segment, and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the components of the identified intangible assets associated
with this acquisition, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Average Life |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In years) |
|
Current technology |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Customer base |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the operating results of the acquired 3ware
business from the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information has not been presented
because the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Companys financial results.
Note 5 Benefit Obligations
The Company has pension plans covering substantially all former Agere U. S. employees,
excluding management employees hired after June 30, 2003. Retirement benefits are offered under a
defined benefit plan and are based on either an adjusted career average pay or dollar per month
formula or on a cash balance program. The cash balance program provides for annual company
contributions
10
based on a participants age, compensation and interest on existing balances and covers
employees of certain companies acquired by Agere since 1996 and management employees hired after
January 1, 1999 and before July 1, 2003. The Company also has a non- qualified supplemental pension
plan in the U.S. that principally provides benefits based on compensation in excess of amounts that
can be considered under a tax qualified plan. The Company also provides postretirement life
insurance coverage for former Agere employees. The Company provided postretirement medical benefits
for former Agere employees until December 31, 2008. Participants in the cash balance program and
management employees hired after June 30, 2003 are not covered under the postretirement life
insurance. The Company also has pension plans covering certain international employees.
Effective April 6, 2009, the Company froze the U.S. management pension plan, which covers
active participants who joined the Company from Agere. Participants under the adjusted career
average pay program will not earn any future accruals after that date. Participants under the cash
balance program will not earn any future service accruals, but will continue to earn 4% interest
per year on their cash balance accounts.
The following table sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit credit for the three
and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
18,605 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
18,528 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(19,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
(20,581 |
) |
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain recognized |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit credit |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
(657 |
) |
|
$ |
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
957 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
2,811 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
36,876 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
37,056 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(38,403 |
) |
|
|
(2,438 |
) |
|
|
(41,163 |
) |
|
|
(2,517 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain recognized |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit credit |
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,314 |
) |
|
$ |
(991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended July 5, 2009, the Company contributed $5.1 million to its pension
plans and $1.8 million to its postretirement benefit plans. The Company expects to contribute an
additional $16.0 million to $55.0 million to its pension plans and $0.1 million to its postretirement benefit plans
for the remainder of 2009.
Note 6 Balance Sheet Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
33,784 |
|
|
$ |
44,208 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
26,360 |
|
|
|
52,242 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
98,514 |
|
|
|
124,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
158,658 |
|
|
$ |
220,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Conversion |
|
|
July 5, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Price |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4% Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
13.4200 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
6.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
$ |
15.3125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,002 |
|
Accrued debt premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,405 |
|
Amortization of accrued debt premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
595,107 |
|
Current portion of longterm debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350,000 |
) |
|
|
(245,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
During the three months ended July 5, 2009, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding
principal amount of $243.0 million of 6.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due in December 2009 at a
price of 100.43% of the principal amount of each note plus accrued interest to the date of
redemption. A net pre-tax gain of $0.1 million was recognized and included in interest income and
other, net. The pre-tax gain is net of the write off of the unamortized accrued debt premium as of
the redemption date.
During the three months ended July 5, 2009, the 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes became due
within 12 months. As such, the balance was reclassified to the current portion of long-term debt.
As of July 5, 2009, the estimated fair value of the 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes was $349.1
million, based on market data.
Note 7 Identified Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Identified Intangible Assets
Identified intangible assets by reportable segment were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Semiconductor: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current technology |
|
$ |
894,808 |
|
|
$ |
(569,203 |
) |
|
$ |
894,808 |
|
|
$ |
(524,120 |
) |
Trademarks |
|
|
26,657 |
|
|
|
(26,657 |
) |
|
|
26,657 |
|
|
|
(26,657 |
) |
Customer base |
|
|
399,508 |
|
|
|
(179,970 |
) |
|
|
399,508 |
|
|
|
(160,925 |
) |
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
(1,929 |
) |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
Existing purchase orders |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
Supply agreement |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Patent licensing |
|
|
312,800 |
|
|
|
(81,313 |
) |
|
|
312,800 |
|
|
|
(63,243 |
) |
Order backlog |
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
|
(41,300 |
) |
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
|
(41,300 |
) |
Workforce |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
Trade names |
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,683,137 |
|
|
|
(904,475 |
) |
|
|
1,683,137 |
|
|
|
(821,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current technology |
|
|
165,829 |
|
|
|
(139,099 |
) |
|
|
164,339 |
|
|
|
(136,104 |
) |
Trademarks |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
(7,150 |
) |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
(7,150 |
) |
Customer base |
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
(5,118 |
) |
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
|
(5,010 |
) |
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
Supply agreement |
|
|
8,147 |
|
|
|
(8,147 |
) |
|
|
8,147 |
|
|
|
(8,147 |
) |
Trade names |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
192,066 |
|
|
|
(161,434 |
) |
|
|
187,046 |
|
|
|
(158,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,875,203 |
|
|
$ |
(1,065,909 |
) |
|
$ |
1,870,183 |
|
|
$ |
(980,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 21, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets and certain associated
intellectual property of the 3ware RAID storage adapter business.
The following table summarizes amortization expenses and weighted average lives of identified
intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Average Life |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In months) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current technology |
|
|
57 |
|
|
$ |
48,078 |
|
|
$ |
65,525 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Customer base |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
29,309 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Patent licensing |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
18,070 |
|
|
|
18,122 |
|
Workforce |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
50 |
|
|
$ |
85,723 |
|
|
$ |
114,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The estimated annual future amortization expenses related to identified intangible assets are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
2009 (July 6 through December 31, 2009) |
|
$ |
85,417 |
|
2010 |
|
|
156,989 |
|
2011 |
|
|
121,644 |
|
2012 |
|
|
104,643 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
340,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
809,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, all of which
related to the Companys Storage Systems segment, for the six months ended July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
175,624 |
|
Additions as a result of acquisition during the period * |
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 5, 2009 |
|
$ |
179,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
During the three months ended July 5, 2009, the Company recorded $3.6 million of goodwill in
connection with the acquisition of the 3ware RAID storage adapter business. |
Note 8 Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following table shows the breakdown of the Companys cash, cash equivalents and
investments as of July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in financial institutions |
|
$ |
177,038 |
|
|
$ |
77,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight deposits and money market funds |
|
|
477,916 |
|
|
|
744,430 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents |
|
|
477,916 |
|
|
|
751,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
654,954 |
|
|
$ |
829,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities: * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
157,816 |
|
|
$ |
184,511 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
52,987 |
|
|
|
88,504 |
|
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
|
|
7,876 |
|
|
|
16,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
218,679 |
|
|
$ |
289,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments in equity securities: ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable available-for-sale equity securities |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
Non-marketable equity securities |
|
|
49,070 |
|
|
|
46,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments in equity securities |
|
$ |
50,572 |
|
|
$ |
46,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Short-term investments in marketable debt securities are reported at fair value. |
|
** |
|
Included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Long-term investments in
marketable equity securities are reported at fair value. For non-marketable equity securities,
the Company does not estimate the fair values unless there are identified events or changes in
circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the investment. If management
determines that these non-
marketable equity investments are impaired, losses are generally measured by using pricing
reflected in current rounds of financing. |
13
Investments in Available-for-Sale Securities
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities as of July 5, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
21,203 |
|
Due in 1-5 years |
|
|
44,789 |
|
Due in 5-10 years |
|
|
18,432 |
|
Due after 10 years |
|
|
134,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
218,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities were determined based on
contractual principal maturities assuming no prepayments.
The following table shows the breakdown of the estimated fair value of the Companys
available-for-sale securities as of July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Short-term debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
155,270 |
|
|
$ |
4,681 |
|
|
$ |
(2,135 |
) |
|
$ |
157,816 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
50,701 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,987 |
|
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
|
|
7,870 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
7,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
213,841 |
|
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
$ |
(2,240 |
) |
|
$ |
218,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Short-term debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
183,385 |
|
|
$ |
1,829 |
|
|
$ |
(703 |
) |
|
$ |
184,511 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
85,426 |
|
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,504 |
|
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
16,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
285,994 |
|
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
(1,114 |
) |
|
$ |
289,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
566 |
|
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
short-term investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than and
greater than 12 months, aggregated by investment category as of July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
25,305 |
|
|
$ |
(1,979 |
) |
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,418 |
|
|
$ |
(2,070 |
) |
|
$ |
6,090 |
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the fair value of a debt security is less than its amortized cost basis, the Company
assesses whether the impairment is other than temporary. If the Company does not intend to sell and
it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt securities before
the expected recovery of the amortized cost, then the Company recognizes in earnings the amount of
the other than temporary impairment representing the credit loss and all other amounts in other
comprehensive income. Credit loss represents the present value of cash flows expected to be
collected less the amortized cost of the debt security. The Company evaluates both qualitative and
quantitative factors such as duration and severity of the unrealized loss, credit ratings,
prepayment speeds, default and loss rates of the underlying collateral, structure and credit
enhancements to determine if a credit loss may exist.
14
During the three and six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company recognized impairment charges
of $2.8 million for certain available-for-sale debt and equity securities after determining that
the decline in their fair value was other than temporary. During the three and six months ended
July 5, 2009, there was no other than temporary impairment charge for available-for-sale debt and
equity securities for which the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost. There
are no other than temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income.
Net realized gain or loss on sales of available-for-sale debt securities for the three and six
months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008 was not significant.
Note 9 Derivative Instruments
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (FAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. FAS 161 expands
quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 (FAS 133), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, about an entitys derivative instruments and hedging
activities. The Company adopted FAS 161 in the first quarter of 2009, and the adoption did not have
any impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
The Company has foreign subsidiaries that operate and sell the Companys products in various
global markets. As a result, the Company is exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The Company utilizes forward contracts to manage its exposure associated with net asset and
liability positions denominated in non-functional currencies and to reduce the volatility of
earnings and cash flows related to forecasted foreign currency transactions. The Company does not
hold derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
The Company enters into forward contracts that are designated as foreign currency cash flow
hedges of selected forecasted payments denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. These
forward contracts have maturities of less than 12 months. Changes in the fair value of the forward
contracts attributable to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness
and are recognized in interest income and other, net. The effective portion of the forward
contracts gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (AOCI) and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects
earnings. The ineffective portion, if any, of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately.
As of July 5, 2009, the Company held forward contracts designated as foreign currency cash
flow hedges of forecasted Euro, Pound Sterling and Indian Rupee payment transactions that were set
to expire in one to ten months. As of July 5, 2009, the notional value of the forward contracts
that were designated as cash flow hedges was $21.8 million. The Company did not enter into foreign
currency cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008.
The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts that are used to hedge certain
foreign currency-denominated assets or liabilities that do not qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting treatment. Accordingly, the changes in fair value of these hedges are recorded
immediately in earnings to offset the changes in fair value of the assets or liabilities being
hedged. The Companys foreign exchange forward contracts related to foreign currency-denominated
assets or liabilities generally range from one to three months in original maturity.
The Company has forward contracts, not designated as cash flow hedges, with obligations to buy
Japanese Yen, Euro, Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar, Singapore Dollar, Korean Won and Indian Rupee.
As of July 5, 2009, the notional value of the forward contracts that were not designated as cash
flow hedges was $250.1 million.
The balance sheet classification and the fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets designated as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
Derivative assets not designated as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
996 |
|
Other accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities designated as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
102 |
|
Derivative liabilities not designated as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
136 |
|
15
The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the AOCI and the
effective portion reclassified from AOCI into Companys statement of operations for the three and
six months ended July 5, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accumulated loss in OCI, beginning of period, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,117 |
) |
|
$ |
(905 |
) |
Net unrealized gain recorded in OCI (effective portion) |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Loss reclassified from AOCI to research and development expenses (effective portion) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Loss reclassified from AOCI to selling, general and administrative expenses (effective portion) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated gain in OCI, end of period, net of tax |
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended July 5, 2009, the gain recognized in earnings related to
ineffective portion and excluded from effectiveness testing for the cash flow hedges were $0.1
million and $0.3 million, respectively.
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges on the Companys
statement of operations for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Gain/(loss) recognized in interest income and other, net |
|
$ |
12,441 |
|
|
$ |
(4,349 |
) |
Note 10 Fair Value Measurements
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FAS
157), which delays the effective date of FAS 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until annual periods beginning after November
15, 2008. The Company adopted FSP 157-2 in the first quarter of 2009, and the adoption had no
material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The
Companys financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value have been categorized
based upon the following three levels of inputs:
Level 1 Unadjusted, quoted prices in active, accessible markets for identical assets or
liabilities. The Companys investments in marketable equity securities and money market funds that
are traded in active exchange markets, as well as U.S. Treasury securities that are highly
liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets are classified under level 1.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. The Companys investments in U.S. government agency
securities, commercial paper, corporate and municipal debt securities and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities are traded less frequently than exchange-traded securities and are
valued using inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, and inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset, such as interest rates and yield curves
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Foreign exchange forward contracts traded in the
over-the-counter markets are valued using market transactions, or broker quotations. As such, these
derivative instruments are classified within level 2.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and
liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
16
The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of July 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Short-term investments in debt securities and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
530,914 |
|
|
$ |
165,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
696,595 |
|
Long-term investments in marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
Derivative assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
Rabbi Trust all invested in money market funds |
|
$ |
9,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,763 |
|
Note 11 Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the
computation of basic and diluted per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Loss* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
Loss* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
Basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(61,483 |
) |
|
|
650,300 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,647 |
) |
|
|
639,872 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Stock options, employee stock purchase
rights and restricted stock unit awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(61,483 |
) |
|
|
650,300 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,647 |
) |
|
|
639,872 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Loss* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
Loss* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
Basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(165,030 |
) |
|
|
649,360 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
|
|
650,867 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Stock options, employee stock purchase
rights and restricted stock unit awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(165,030 |
) |
|
|
649,360 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
|
|
650,867 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Numerator |
|
+ |
|
Denominator |
Options to purchase 81,120,105 and 96,064,777 weighted average shares were excluded from the
computation of diluted shares for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009, respectively,
because of their antidilutive effect on net loss per share. Options to purchase 87,814,384 and
91,393,949 weighted average shares were excluded from the computation of diluted shares for the
three and six months ended June 29, 2008, respectively, because of their antidilutive effect on net
loss per share.
For the three and six months ended July 5, 2009, 38,636,562 and 40,328,899, respectively,
weighted average potentially dilutive shares associated with convertible notes were excluded from
the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net loss per share. For
the three and six months ended June 29, 2008, 49,698,093 and 49,698,581, respectively, weighted
average potentially dilutive shares associated with convertible notes were excluded from the
calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net loss per share.
Note 12 Segment and Geographic Information
The Company operates in two reportable segments the Semiconductor segment and the Storage
Systems segment.
17
Summary of Operations by Segment
The following is a summary of operations by segment for the three and six months ended July 5,
2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
343,786 |
|
|
$ |
462,010 |
|
|
$ |
668,820 |
|
|
$ |
920,812 |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
176,879 |
|
|
|
230,053 |
|
|
|
334,124 |
|
|
|
431,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
520,665 |
|
|
$ |
692,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,944 |
|
|
$ |
1,352,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
(52,232 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,926 |
) |
|
$ |
(132,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,263 |
) |
Storage Systems |
|
|
(3,531 |
) |
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
(17,610 |
) |
|
|
32,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(55,763 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,408 |
) |
|
$ |
(149,937 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Customers
The following table provides information about the Companys significant customers, each of
whom accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues or 10% or more of either segments
revenues, for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
Semiconductor segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
Storage Systems segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
48%, 11 |
% |
|
|
47%, 16 |
% |
|
|
46%, 12%, 11 |
% |
|
|
45%, 16 |
% |
|
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
18%, 16 |
% |
|
|
17%, 16 |
% |
|
|
17%, 16 |
% |
|
|
19%, 15 |
% |
Information about Geographic Areas
Revenues from domestic operations were $112.1 million, representing 21.5% of consolidated
revenues, for the three months ended July 5, 2009, as compared to $220.8 million, representing
31.9% of consolidated revenues, for the three months ended June 29, 2008.
Revenues from domestic operations were $219.9 million, representing 21.9% of consolidated
revenues, for the six months ended July 5, 2009, as compared to $427.6 million, representing 31.6%
of consolidated revenues, for the six months ended June 29, 2008.
Note 13 Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Comprehensive income or loss is defined as a change in equity of a company during a period
from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive loss, net of taxes, for the three
and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(61,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,647 |
) |
|
$ |
(165,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
(2,366 |
) |
Net unrealized gain on cash-flow hedges |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
(9,109 |
) |
|
|
(7,322 |
) |
|
|
5,795 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial gain
included in net periodic benefit credit |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(48,481 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,104 |
) |
|
$ |
(169,993 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14 Income Taxes
The income tax provision for the three months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008, was $5.2
million and $2.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008,
the Company did not record any re-measurement or reversal of uncertain tax positions.
The income tax provision for the six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008, was $13.2
million and $8.0 million, respectively. During the six months ended July 5, 2009, the Company
recorded a reversal of $29.8 million in liabilities, which includes previously unrecognized tax
benefits of $15.7 million and interest and penalties of $14.1 million, because various statutes of
limitations expired during the period and an increase of $32.9 million, which includes unrecognized
tax benefits of $25.0 million and interest and penalties of $7.9 million, as a result of
re-measurements of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods based on new
18
information. During the six months ended June 29, 2008, the Company recorded a reversal of an
$8.8 million liability because a statute of limitations expired during the period and an increase
of $2.1 million as a result of re-measurement of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods
based on new information.
The income or loss from certain jurisdictions has been excluded from the overall estimation of
the annual rate because of the anticipated annual pretax losses in those jurisdictions for which
tax benefits are not realizable or cannot be recognized in the current year. Excluding certain
foreign jurisdictions, management believes that it is more likely than not that the future benefit
of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Note 15 Related Party Transactions
A member of the Companys board of directors is also a member of the board of directors of
Seagate Technology. The Company sells semiconductors used in storage product applications to
Seagate Technology for prices comparable to those charged to an unrelated third party. Storage
product applications include disk drives, RAID subsystems and tape drives. Revenues from sales to
Seagate Technology were $82.4 million and $162.4 million for the three and six months ended July 5,
2009, respectively. Revenues from sales to Seagate Technology were $113.8 million and $252.6
million for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008, respectively. The Company had accounts
receivable from Seagate Technology of $55.1 million and $43.5 million as of July 5, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
Upon the merger with Agere, the Company acquired an equity interest in a joint venture,
Silicon Manufacturing Partners Pte Ltd. (SMP), formed by Agere and Chartered Semiconductor
Manufacturing Ltd. (Chartered Semiconductor), a manufacturing foundry for integrated circuits.
SMP operates an integrated circuit manufacturing facility in Singapore. The Company owns a 51%
equity interest in this joint venture, and Chartered Semiconductor owns the remaining 49% equity
interest. The Companys 51% interest in SMP is accounted for under the equity method because the
Company is effectively precluded from unilaterally taking any significant action in the management
of SMP due to Chartered Semiconductors significant participatory rights under the joint venture
agreement. Because of Chartered Semiconductors approval rights, the Company cannot make any
significant decisions regarding SMP without Chartered Semiconductors approval, despite the 51%
equity interest. In addition, the General Manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day management
of SMP, is appointed by Chartered Semiconductor, and Chartered Semiconductor provides the
day-to-day operational support to SMP.
The Company purchased $10.9 million and $22.0 million of inventory from SMP for the three and
six months ended July 5, 2009, respectively. The Company purchased $17.6 million and $36.5 million
of inventory from SMP for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008, respectively. As of July 5,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the amounts of inventory on hand that were purchased from SMP were $5.9
million and $14.1 million, respectively, and the amounts payable to SMP were $7.2 million and $2.7
million, respectively.
Note 16 Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Matters
Purchase Commitments
The Company maintains purchase commitments with certain suppliers primarily for raw materials
and manufacturing services and for some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory
materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the
parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary for different suppliers. As of July 5, 2009, the total
purchase commitments were $625.5 million, which are due through 2011.
The Company has a take or pay agreement with SMP under which it has agreed to purchase 51% of
the managed wafer capacity from SMPs integrated circuit manufacturing facility and Chartered
Semiconductor agreed to purchase the remaining 49% of the managed wafer capacity. SMP determines
its managed wafer capacity each year based on forecasts provided by the Company and Chartered
Semiconductor. If the Company fails to purchase its required commitments, it will be required to
pay SMP for the fixed costs associated with the unpurchased wafers. Chartered Semiconductor is
similarly obligated with respect to the wafers allotted to it. The agreement may be terminated by
either party upon two years written notice. The agreement may also be terminated for material
breach, bankruptcy or insolvency.
19
Guarantees
Product Warranties:
The Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship under normal
use and service for periods of one to five years. A liability for estimated future costs under
product warranties is recorded when products are shipped.
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in product warranties during the six
months ended July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
12,238 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
8,127 |
|
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) |
|
|
58 |
|
Settlements made during the period (in cash or in kind) |
|
|
(6,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 5, 2009 |
|
$ |
13,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit:
As of July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding obligations relating to
standby letters of credit of $5.3 million and $19.2 million, respectively. Standby letters of
credit are financial guarantees provided by third parties for leases, claims from litigation and
certain self-insured risks. If the guarantees are called, the Company must reimburse the provider
of the guarantee. The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount and they
generally have one-year terms.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of July 5, 2009, the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits was $247.6 million, of which
the Company expects to pay $36.9 million within one year. Accordingly, this amount has been
recorded in other current liabilities. For the remaining balance, the Company is unable to make a
reasonably reliable estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. It is
reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease in
the next 12 months. Such changes could occur based on the normal expiration of various statutes of
limitations or the possible conclusion of ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions around the
world. If those events occur within the next 12 months, the Company estimates that in addition to
the $36.9 million discussed above, unrecognized tax benefits, plus accrued interest and penalties,
could decrease by an amount in the range of $0 to $27.7 million.
Indemnifications
The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to
indemnify the other party. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and
license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Company customarily agrees to hold the
other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of warranties, representations and
covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual
property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax-related matters. In
each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is typically subject to the other party making
a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular
contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge the other partys claims or, in case of
breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement
of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, the Companys obligations under
these agreements may be limited in terms of activity (typically to replace or correct the products
or terminate the agreement with a refund to the other party), duration and/or amounts. In some
instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties covering certain payments made by
the Company.
Legal Matters
On December 6, 2006, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA Inc. (Sony Ericsson) filed a
lawsuit against Agere in Wake County Superior Court in North Carolina, alleging unfair and
deceptive trade practices, fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with Ageres
engagement with Sony Ericsson to develop a wireless data card for personal computers. The complaint
claims an unspecified amount of damages and seeks damages, treble damages and attorneys fees. On
February 13, 2007, Agere filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. On August 27, 2007, the
court granted Ageres motion to dismiss for improper venue. Sony Ericsson appealed that ruling. On
March 3, 2009, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the lower courts ruling. On October
22, 2007, Sony Ericsson filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York
County against LSI, raising substantially the same allegations and seeking substantially the same
relief as the North Carolina proceeding.
20
On March 23, 2007, CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing (GE) filed a lawsuit against Agere
in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting that Agere products
infringe patents in a portfolio of patents GE acquired from Motorola. GE has asserted that four of
the patents cover inventions relating to modems. GE is seeking monetary damages. The Company
believes it has a number of defenses to the infringement claims in this action, including laches,
exhaustion and its belief that it has a license to the patents. The court postponed hearing motions
based on these defenses until after the trial, and did not allow the Company to present evidence on
these defenses at trial. On February 17, 2009, the jury in this case returned a verdict finding
that three of the four patents were invalid and that Agere products infringed the one patent found
to be valid and awarding GE $7.6 million for infringement of that patent. The jury also found
Ageres infringement was willful, which means that the judge could enhance the verdict up to three
times its original amount. The court has not scheduled hearings on the Companys post-trial motions
related to its defenses. One of these motions seeks to have a mis-trial declared based on the
Companys belief that GE withheld evidence in discovery which affected the Companys ability to
present evidence at trial. The court has agreed to appoint a special master to investigate this
matter. If the jurys verdict is entered by the court, the Company would also expect to be required
to pay interest from the date of infringing sales. If the verdict is entered, LSI intends to appeal the
matter.
In April 2008, LSI filed an action with the International Trade Commission seeking the
exclusion for the United States of products produced by 23 companies. Qimonda AG, one of these
companies, filed a lawsuit against LSI in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia (Richmond Division) on November 12, 2008, alleging that LSIs products infringe seven
of Qimondas patents. Qimonda is seeking monetary damages, treble damages and costs, expenses and
attorneys fees due to alleged willfulness, interest, and temporary and permanent injunctive relief
for all the patents in the suit. On November 20, 2008, Qimonda filed an ITC action against LSI and
Seagate alleging that multiple LSI products infringe the same seven patents. Subsequently, Qimonda
dropped from the ITC proceeding its claims relating to three of the patents. An administrative law
judge appointed by the ITC held a hearing on Qimondas remaining claims in June 2009. Qimonda has
stated that insolvency proceedings for it opened on April 1, 2009.
As reported in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2009, the
litigation with Silicon Space Technology Corporation was settled in the first quarter of 2009.
In addition to the foregoing, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to other litigation
matters and claims in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe, based on
currently available facts and circumstances, that the final outcome of these other matters, taken
individually or as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations or financial position. However, the pending unsettled lawsuits may involve complex
questions of fact and law and may require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of
other resources to defend. From time to time, the Company may enter into confidential discussions
regarding the potential settlement of such lawsuits. However, there can be no assurance that any
such discussions will occur or will result in a settlement. Moreover, the settlement of any pending
litigation could require the Company to incur substantial costs and, in the case of the settlement
of any intellectual property proceeding against the Company, may require the Company to obtain a
license under a third partys intellectual property rights that could require royalty payments in
the future and the Company to grant a license to certain of its intellectual property rights to a
third party under a cross-license agreement. The results of litigation are inherently uncertain,
and material adverse outcomes are possible.
The Company believes the amounts provided in its financial statements, which are not material,
are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. However, because such matters are
subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable and there can be no
assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters
described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Companys financial statements or will
not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Note 17 Subsequent Events
On July 27, 2009, the Company acquired privately-held ONStor, Inc. (ONStor) for
approximately $25 million in cash, a portion of which was used for the payment of debt and other
liabilities. ONStor provides clustered network-attached storage solutions designed to help
enterprises consolidate, protect and manage the accelerating growth of unstructured data, which are
expected to further advance the Companys storage business.
In accordance with FAS 165, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through August
11, 2009, the date of issuance of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
21
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the other
sections of this Form 10-Q, including Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements.
Where more than one significant factor contributed to changes in results from year to year, we
have quantified these factors throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations where practicable and material to understanding a material
change included in the discussion.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop and market complex, high-performance semiconductors and storage systems. We
provide silicon-to-system solutions that are used at the core of products that create, store,
consume and transport digital information. We offer a broad portfolio of capabilities including
custom and standard product integrated circuits used in hard disk drives, high-speed communication
systems, computer servers, storage systems and personal computers. We also offer external storage
systems, host bus adapter boards and software applications for attaching storage devices to
computer servers and for storage area networks.
We operate in two segments the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment. For
the Semiconductor segment, we sell our integrated circuits for storage applications principally to
makers of hard disk drives and computer servers. We sell our integrated circuits for networking
applications principally to makers of devices used in computer and communications networks and, to
a lesser extent, to makers of personal computers. For the Storage Systems segment, we sell our
storage systems, host adapter boards and software applications for attaching storage devices to
computer servers and for storage area networks principally to original equipment manufacturers, or
OEMs, who resell those products to end customers under their own brand name. We also generate
revenue by licensing other entities to use our intellectual property. We recognize this revenue
primarily in the Semiconductor segment.
Our revenues depend on market demand for these types of products and our ability to compete in
highly competitive markets. We face competition not only from makers of products similar to ours,
but also from competing technologies. For example, we see the development of solid state drives,
based on flash memory rather than the spinning platters used in hard disk drives, as a long term
potential competitor to certain types of hard disk drives and have begun focusing development
efforts in that area.
The U.S. and global economies have experienced a significant downturn driven by a financial
and credit crisis that could continue to challenge those economies for some period of time. In the
first half of 2009, our revenues declined significantly as compared to our revenues in the first
half of 2008 due to the effects of the global economic downturn. Since January 2009, we have taken
a number of actions to reduce our expenses, including a corporate-level restructuring designed to
increase synergies across our Semiconductor segment, reductions in our global workforce, temporary
and permanent reductions in employee compensation-related expenses and reductions in discretionary
spending.
Although we saw increases in demand in some parts of our business beginning at the end of the
first quarter of 2009, we anticipate that our quarterly revenues will not return to pre-downturn
levels in the near future. Accordingly, we continue to monitor demand and may seek to adjust our
cost structure further.
Our revenues for the three months ended July 5, 2009 were $520.7 million, a decrease of $171.4
million as compared to $692.1 million for the three months ended June 29, 2008. Our revenues for the
six months ended July 5, 2009 were $1,002.9 million, a decrease of $349.9 million, compared to
$1,352.8 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008. These decreases resulted primarily from
the global economic downturn and the resulting lower end-market demand for semiconductors used in
storage and networking product applications and lower demand for our mid-range storage
systems.
We reported a net loss of $61.5 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for the three months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to a net loss of $13.6 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the
three months ended June 29, 2008. We reported a net loss of $165.0 million, or $0.25 per diluted
share, for the six months ended July 5, 2009, as compared to a net loss of $27.3 million, or $0.04
per diluted share, for the six months ended June 29, 2008.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $873.6 million as of July 5, 2009, as
compared to $1,119.1 million as of December 31, 2008. During the quarter ended July 5, 2009, we
used $244.0 million for the redemption of all of the outstanding 6.5% Convertible Subordinated
Notes due in December 2009. For the three and six months ended July 5, 2009, we generated $68.9
million
and $59.1 million, respectively, in cash provided by operating activities, as compared to
$27.3 million and $123.5 million, respectively, cash provided by operating activities for the three
and six months ended June 29, 2008.
22
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues by segment for the three and six months ended July
5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
343.8 |
|
|
$ |
462.0 |
|
|
$ |
668.8 |
|
|
$ |
920.8 |
|
Storage Systems segment |
|
|
176.9 |
|
|
|
230.1 |
|
|
|
334.1 |
|
|
|
432.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
520.7 |
|
|
$ |
692.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,002.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008:
Semiconductor Segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased $118.2 million or 25.6% for the three months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to decreased demand for semiconductors used in storage and networking product
applications as a result of the global economic downturn, and decreased revenues in our older
networking product applications, partially offset by increased revenues in our newer networking
product applications.
Storage Systems Segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased $53.2 million or 23.1% for the three months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to a decrease in revenues for our mid-range storage systems and related premium
software features as a result of the current global economic downturn.
Six months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008:
Semiconductor Segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased $252.0 million or 27.4% for the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to decreased demand for semiconductors used in storage and networking product
applications as a result of the global economic downturn and decreased revenues in our older
networking product applications. The decrease was partially offset by increased revenues in our
newer networking product applications and increased revenues from the licensing of intellectual
property.
Storage Systems Segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased $97.9 million or 22.7% for the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to a decrease in revenues for our mid-range storage systems and related premium
software features as a result of the current global economic downturn.
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for information about our
significant customers.
Revenues by Geography
The following table summarizes our revenues by geography for the three and six months ended
July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
North America * |
|
$ |
112.1 |
|
|
$ |
220.8 |
|
|
$ |
219.7 |
|
|
$ |
427.6 |
|
Asia ** |
|
|
280.4 |
|
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
525.3 |
|
|
|
695.1 |
|
Europe and the Middle East |
|
|
128.2 |
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
|
257.9 |
|
|
|
230.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
520.7 |
|
|
$ |
692.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,002.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily the United States. |
|
** |
|
Including Japan. |
23
Three months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008:
Revenues in North America and Asia decreased 49.2% and 19.2%, respectively, for the three
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease in
North America was primarily attributable to a significant customer shifting order placements from
our U.S. subsidiary to a subsidiary in Europe during the third quarter of 2008, and to a lesser
extent, decreased demand for our mid-range storage systems and semiconductors used in storage and
networking product applications. The decrease in Asia was primarily attributable to decreased
revenues from semiconductors used in storage product applications. Revenues in Europe and the
Middle East increased 3.1% for the three months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months
ended June 29, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to a significant customer shifting
order placements from our U.S. subsidiary to a subsidiary in Europe during the third quarter of
2008, offset in part by decreased demand for semiconductors used in storage and networking product
applications.
Six months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008:
Revenues in North America and Asia decreased 48.6% and 24.4%, respectively, for the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease in North America
was primarily attributable to a significant customer shifting order placements from our U.S.
subsidiary to a subsidiary in Europe during the third quarter of 2008, and to a lesser extent,
decreased demand for our mid-range storage systems and semiconductors used in storage and
networking product applications, offset in part by increased revenues from the licensing of
intellectual property. The decrease in Asia was primarily attributable to decreased revenues from
semiconductors used in storage product applications. Revenues in Europe and the Middle East
increased 12.1% for the six months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29,
2008. The increase was primarily attributable to a significant customer shifting order placements
from our U.S. subsidiary to a subsidiary in Europe during the third quarter of 2008, offset in part
by decreased demand for semiconductors used in storage and networking product applications.
Gross Profit Margin
The following table summarizes our gross profit margins by segment for the three and six
months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
122.1 |
|
|
$ |
196.0 |
|
|
$ |
246.7 |
|
|
$ |
380.9 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
88.9 |
|
|
$ |
104.3 |
|
|
$ |
163.6 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
180.9 |
|
|
$ |
284.9 |
|
|
$ |
351.0 |
|
|
$ |
544.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
Three months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008:
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 34.7% for
the three months ended July 5, 2009 from 41.2% for the three months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of segment revenues for the Semiconductor segment
decreased to 35.5% for the three months ended July 5, 2009 from 42.4% for the three months ended
June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a shift in product mix and lower overall
absorption of fixed costs as a result of the decline in revenues.
24
Storage Systems Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of segment revenues for the Storage Systems segment
decreased to 33.2% for the three months ended July 5, 2009 from 38.6% for the three months ended
June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by a shift in product mix as a greater percentage
of our sales consisted of entry-level storage systems, which have lower margins, along with lower
overall absorption of fixed costs as a result of the decrease in revenues.
Six months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008:
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 35.0% for
the six months ended July 5, 2009 from 40.2% for the six months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of segment revenues for the Semiconductor segment
decreased to 36.9% for the six months ended July 5, 2009 from 41.4% for the six months ended June
29, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a shift in product mix, lower overall
absorption of fixed costs as a result of the decline in revenues and an increase in amortization of
identified intangible assets as a percentage of revenues. The decrease was offset in part by a
decrease in inventory provisions as a result of continued improvements in supply chain management.
Storage Systems Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of segment revenues for the Storage Systems segment
decreased to 31.2% for the six months ended July 5, 2009 from 37.9% for the six months ended June
29, 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by a shift in product mix as a greater percentage of
our sales consisted of entry-level storage systems, which have lower margins, along with lower
overall absorption of fixed costs as a result of the decrease in revenues.
Research and Development
The following table summarizes our research and development, or R&D, expenses by segment for
the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
116.2 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
$ |
239.2 |
|
|
$ |
270.6 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
$ |
69.2 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
148.9 |
|
|
$ |
170.1 |
|
|
$ |
304.2 |
|
|
$ |
339.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
Three months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008:
Consolidated R&D expenses decreased $21.2 million or 12.5% for the three months ended July 5,
2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $19.2 million or 14.2% for the three
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from
the restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction measures, reductions in
discretionary spending and lower spending on materials associated with existing R&D projects. R&D
expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues from 29.3% for
the three months ended June 29, 2008 to 33.8% for the three months ended July 5, 2009, primarily as
a result of the decrease in revenues.
25
Storage Systems Segment:
R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment decreased $2.0 million or 5.8% for the three
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from
the restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction measures, reduction in
discretionary spending and lower depreciation expense as a result of existing assets for product
development that have become fully depreciated coupled with fewer new assets being purchased. The
decrease was offset in part by expenses as a result of headcount additions associated with the
acquisition of the 3ware business. R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues
from 15.1% for the three months ended June 29, 2008 to 18.5% for the three months ended July 5,
2009, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenues.
Six months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008:
Consolidated R&D expenses decreased $35.6 million or 10.5% for the six months ended July 5,
2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $31.4 million or 11.6% for the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from the
restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction measures, reductions in
discretionary spending and lower spending on materials associated with existing R&D projects. R&D
expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues from 29.4% for
the six months ended June 29, 2008 to 35.8% for the six months ended July 5, 2009, primarily as a
result of the decrease in revenues.
Storage Systems Segment:
R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment decreased $4.2 million or 6.1% for the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from the
restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction measures, reductions in
discretionary spending and lower depreciation expense as existing assets for product development
were fully depreciated and fewer new assets were purchased. The decrease was offset in part by
additional compensation-related expenditures as a result of the 3ware acquisition. R&D expenses
for the Storage Systems segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues from 16.0% for the
six months ended June 29, 2008 to 19.5% for the six months ended July 5, 2009, primarily as a
result of the decrease in revenues.
Selling, General and Administrative
The following table summarizes our selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses by
segment for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
110.1 |
|
|
$ |
141.6 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
$ |
55.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.5 |
|
|
$ |
203.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Three months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008:
Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased $22.8 million or 21.8% for the three months ended July 5,
2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $18.6 million or 25.8% for the three
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced
headcount from the restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction
measures, a
decrease in amortization of identified intangible assets, and lower sales and general expenses
attributable to continued cost containment activities.
26
Storage Systems Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment decreased $4.2 million or 13.0% for the three
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of cost reduction
measures, lower spending from continued cost containment activities and lower bad debt expense due
to the decrease in revenues. SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased as a
percentage of segment revenues from 14.0% for the three months ended June 29, 2008 to 15.9% for the
three months ended July 5, 2009, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenues.
Six months ended July 5, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008:
Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased $38.1 million or 18.7% for the six months ended July 5,
2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008.
Semiconductor Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $31.5 million or 22.2% for the six
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced
headcount from the restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction
measures, a decrease in amortization expenses associated with identified intangible assets, and
lower sales and general expenses attributable to continued cost containment activities. SG&A
expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues from 15.4% for
the six months ended June 29, 2008 to 16.5% for the six months ended July 5, 2009, primarily as a
result of the decrease in revenues.
Storage Systems Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment decreased $6.6 million or 10.6% for the six
months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 29, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower compensation-related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from
the restructuring actions taken since January 2009 and other cost reduction measures, lower
spending from continued cost containment activities and lower bad debt expense due to the decrease
in revenues. SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased as a percentage of segment
revenues from 14.4% for the six months ended June 29, 2008 to 16.6% for the six months ended July
5, 2009, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenues.
Restructuring of Operations and Other Items, net
We recorded charges of $6.0 million in restructuring of operations and other items, net, for
the three months ended July 5, 2009. Of these charges, $4.5 million and $1.5 million were recorded
in the Semiconductor segment and Storage Systems segment, respectively. We recorded charges of
$31.2 million in restructuring of operations and other items, net, for the six months ended July 5,
2009, consisting of $25.0 million in charges for restructuring of operations and $6.2 million in
charges for other items. Of these charges, $29.7 million and $1.5 million were recorded in the
Semiconductor segment and Storage Systems segment, respectively.
We recorded charges of $20.7 million in restructuring of operations and other items, net, for
the three months ended June 29, 2008, consisting of $10.0 million in charges for restructuring of
operations and $10.7 million in charges for other items. The majority of the $20.7 million in
charges for three months ended June 29, 2008 were recorded in the Semiconductor segment. We
recorded charges of $25.3 million in restructuring of operations and other items, net, for the six
months ended June 29, 2008, consisting of $13.3 million in charges for restructuring of operations
and $12.0 million in charges for other items. The majority of the $25.3 million in charges for the
six months ended June 29, 2008 were recorded in the Semiconductor segment.
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for more information about the
restructuring charges recorded during 2009.
27
Interest (Expense) or Income and Other, net
The following table summarizes our interest expense and components of interest income and
other, net, for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
July 5, 2009 |
|
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Other income/(expense), net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $2.1 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended
July 5, 2009, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 as a result
of the repurchase of $118.6 million of 6.5% convertible subordinated notes in the fourth quarter of
2008 and the redemption of the remaining 6.5% convertible subordinated notes on June 15, 2009.
Interest Income and Other, net:
Interest income decreased $4.8 million and $12.7 million for the three and six months ended
July 5, 2009, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 primarily
as a result of lower interest rates during 2009 compared to 2008.
Other expense, net, decreased $2.9 million and $2.1 million for the three and six months ended
July 5, 2009 as compared to the three and six months ended June 29, 2008 primarily as a result of
$2.8 million of impairment charges related to certain marketable available-for-sale debt and equity
securities in the second quarter of 2008, offset in part by other miscellaneous items.
Provision for Income Taxes
During the three months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008, we recorded an income tax
provision of $5.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended July 5, 2009
and June 29, 2008, we did not record any re-measurement or reversal of uncertain tax
positions.
During the six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008, we recorded an income tax
provision of $13.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively. During the six months ended July 5,
2009, we recorded a reversal of $29.8 million in liabilities, which includes previously unrecognized
tax benefits of $15.7 million and interest and penalties of $14.1 million, because various statutes
of limitations expired during the period and an increase of $32.9 million, which includes
unrecognized tax benefits of $25.0 million and interest and penalties of $7.9 million, as a result
of re-measurements of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods based on new information.
During the six months ended June 29, 2008, we recorded a reversal of an $8.8 million
liability because a statute of limitations expired during the period and an increase of $2.1
million as a result of re-measurement of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods based on
new information.
We have excluded the income or loss from certain jurisdictions from the overall estimation of
the annual rate due to the anticipated pretax losses in those jurisdictions for annual periods for
which tax benefits are not realizable or cannot be recognized in the current year. Excluding
certain foreign jurisdictions, management believes that it is more likely than not that the future
benefit of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased to $873.6 million at July 5, 2009
from $1,119.1 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease was mainly due to cash outflows for
financing activities, offset in part by cash provided by operating and investing activities as
described below.
28
Working Capital
Working capital decreased by $375.4 million to $626.5 million at July 5, 2009 from $1,001.9
million at December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $245.5 million; |
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt increased by $104.9 million as a result of a
reclassification of $350.0 million of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes that are due in May
2010 from long-term debt to current portion of long-term debt, offset in part by the redemption of
$243.0 million principal amount of 6.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes during the second
quarter of 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Inventories decreased by $61.9 million primarily as a result of lowering inventory
purchases, reflecting our continued focus on supply chain management; |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable decreased by $36.1 million primarily as a result of lower revenues in
the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased by $15.3 million primarily as a
result of declines in tax-related receivables, other receivables and prepaid software,
offset in part by an increase in prepaid taxes. |
These decreases in working capital were offset in part by:
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased by $55.3 million primarily as a result of lower purchases
following the global economic downturn and the timing of invoice receipts and payments; and |
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits decreased by $32.7 million primarily as a result of
the absence of performance-based compensation accruals. |
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $59.1 million for the six months ended July 5,
2009 compared to $123.5 million for the six months ended June 29,
2008. Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended July 5, 2009 was the result
of:
|
|
|
A net loss adjusted for non-cash transactions, primarily depreciation and amortization
and stock-based compensation expense. The non-cash items and other non-operating adjustments
are quantified in the Statements of Cash Flows included in Item 1; offset by |
|
|
|
|
A net increase in assets and liabilities, including changes in working capital
components, from December 31, 2008 to July 5, 2009, as discussed above. |
Cash Provided by Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended July 5, 2009 was $3.1 million
compared to $177.2 million used in investing activities for the six months ended June 29, 2008.
The primary investing activities for the six months ended July 5, 2009 were:
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale debt securities and equity
securities, net of purchases; |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software, net of sales; |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired; and |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in non-current assets and deposits. |
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $45.0 million in 2009. In recent years, we
have reduced our level of capital expenditures as a result of our focus on establishing strategic
supplier alliances with foundry semiconductor manufacturers and with third-party assembly and test
operations, which enables us to have access to advanced manufacturing capacity and reduce our
capital spending requirements.
29
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended July 5, 2009 was $237.4 million
compared to $199.7 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008. The
primary financing activities during the six months ended July 5, 2009 was the use of $244.0 million
to redeem convertible subordinated notes, offset by the proceeds from the issuances of common stock
under our employee stock purchase plan.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are our primary source of liquidity. We
believe that our existing liquid resources and cash generated from operations will be adequate to
meet our operating and capital requirements and other obligations, including repayment of our
outstanding convertible subordinated notes as they mature, for the next twelve months and beyond.
We may find it desirable to obtain additional debt or equity financing or seek to refinance our
existing convertible notes. We believe that financing is currently difficult for many companies to
obtain on acceptable terms or at all. Accordingly, such financing may not be available to us at all
or on acceptable terms if we determine that it would be desirable to obtain additional financing.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of July 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
After 5 Years |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
Estimated interest payments on
convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.5 |
|
Purchase commitments |
|
|
376.6 |
|
|
|
248.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625.5 |
|
Unrecognized tax positions |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.1 |
** |
|
|
235.0 |
|
Pension and postretirement contributions |
|
|
16.0 to 55.0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16.0 to 55.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
869.2 to $908.2 |
|
|
$ |
310.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
198.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,396.0 to $1,435.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We have pension plans covering substantially all former Agere Systems U.S. employees,
excluding management employees hired after June 30, 2003. We also have pension plans covering
certain international employees. Although additional future contributions will be required,
the amount and timing of these contributions will be impacted by actuarial assumptions, the
actual rate of return on plan assets, the level of market interest rates, and the amount of
voluntary contributions to the plans. The amount shown in the table
represents the range of our anticipated contributions to our pension
plans for the remainder of 2009. Because any contributions for 2010
and later will depend on the value of the plan assets in the future
and thus are uncertain, we have not included any amounts for 2010 and
beyond. If current macroeconomic conditions continue, the
additional contributions in future years would likely be higher than those projected for 2009.
Effective April 6, 2009, we froze the U.S. management pension plan, which covers active
participants who joined us from Agere. |
|
** |
|
Represents the non-current tax payable obligation. We are unable to make a reasonably
reliable estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. |
Convertible Subordinated Notes
As of July 5, 2009, we had outstanding $350.0 million of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due on
May 15, 2010. Interest on these notes is payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each
year. These notes are subordinated to all existing and future senior debt and are convertible at
the holders option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of approximately $13.42
per share at any time prior to maturity. We cannot elect to redeem these notes prior to maturity.
Each holder of these notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holders convertible
notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest upon the occurrence
of any fundamental change, which includes a transaction or an event such as an exchange offer,
liquidation, a tender offer, consolidation, certain mergers or combinations.
Fluctuations in our stock price impact the prices of our outstanding convertible securities
and the likelihood of the convertible securities being converted into equity. We believe that our
current cash position and expected future operating cash flows will be adequate to meet these
obligations as they mature.
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease real estate, certain non-manufacturing equipment and software under non-cancelable
operating leases.
30
Purchase Commitments
We maintain certain purchase commitments with suppliers primarily for raw materials and
manufacturing services and for some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory
materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the
parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary for different suppliers.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of July 5, 2009, the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits was $247.6 million, of which
we expect to pay $36.9 million within one year. Accordingly, this amount has been recorded in other
current liabilities. For the remaining balance, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable
estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. It is reasonably possible
that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease in the next 12 months.
Such changes could occur based on the normal expiration of various statutes of limitations or the
possible conclusion of ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions around the world. If those
events occur within the next 12 months, we estimate that unrecognized tax benefits, plus accrued
interest and penalties, could decrease by an amount in the range of $0 to $27.7 million.
Standby Letters of Credit
As of July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had outstanding obligations relating to standby
letters of credit of $5.3 million and $19.2 million, respectively. Standby letters of credit are
financial guarantees provided by third parties for leases, claims from litigations and certain
self-insured risks. If the guarantees are called, we must reimburse the provider of the guarantee.
The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount and they generally have
one-year terms.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no significant changes in the critical accounting estimates and significant
accounting policies during the six months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the discussion in Part
II, Item 7 and in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The information contained in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 under
the heading Recent Accounting Pronouncements is incorporated by reference into this Item 2.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in the market risk disclosures during the six months
ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the discussion in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission define the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a companys controls and
other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required or necessary
disclosures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on the
evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures by our management with
the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the
period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for this
purpose.
Changes in Internal Control: During the second quarter of 2009, we did not make any change in
our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
31
The business of Agere Systems, which we acquired in April 2007, used a different enterprise
resource planning, or ERP, system from the system we have used historically. In the second quarter
of 2009, we completed the conversion of Ageres business to our ERP system. We believe that this
transition did not materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
This information is included under the caption Legal Matters in Note 16 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Set forth below are risks and uncertainties, many of which are discussed in greater detail in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, that, if they were to occur,
could materially adversely affect our business or that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this report and other
public statements we make:
|
|
|
We depend on a small number of customers. The loss of, or a significant reduction in
revenue from, any of these customers would harm our results of operations. |
A limited number of customers accounts for a substantial portion of our revenues. In 2008,
Seagate and IBM, our two largest customers, represented approximately 17% and 16%, respectively, of
our total revenues, and our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 60.7% of our revenue.
If any of our key customers reduced significantly or canceled its orders, our business and
operating results could be significantly harmed. Because many of our semiconductor products are
designed for specific customers and have long product design and development cycles, it may be
difficult for us to replace key customers that reduce or cancel their existing orders for these
products.
In addition, if we fail to win new product designs from our major customers, our business and
results of operations may be harmed. Further, if our major customers make significant changes in
scheduled deliveries, decide to pursue the internal development of the products we sell to them or
are acquired, our business and results of operations may be harmed. For example, business
combinations such as Oracles proposed acquisition of Sun Microsystems, a customer of our Storage
Systems business, could result in changes in the competitive environment we face. These
combinations could have a positive or negative impact on our business.
|
|
|
If we fail to keep pace with technological advances, or if we pursue technologies that do
not become commercially accepted, customers may not buy our products and our results of
operations may be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
We operate in intensely competitive markets, and our failure to compete effectively would
harm our results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Customer orders and ordering patterns can change quickly, making it difficult for us to
predict our revenues and making it possible that our actual revenues may vary materially
from our expectations, which could harm our results of operations and stock price. |
|
|
|
|
A prolonged economic downturn could have a material negative impact on our results of
operations and financial condition. |
In late 2008, the media reported significant declines in economic activity and reduced
availability of credit in the United States and other countries around the world. Prices of equity
securities generally also experienced declines. If these declines persist or get worse, they could
negatively affect our business in several ways, in addition to resulting in lower demand for our
products and causing potential disruptions at customers or suppliers that might encounter financial
difficulties.
We have defined benefit pension plans under which we are obligated to make future payments to
participants. We have set aside funds to meet our anticipated obligations under these plans. These
funds are invested in equity and fixed income securities. Since mid-2008, market prices of these
types of securities have declined significantly. At December 31, 2008, our projected benefit
obligations
32
under our pension plans exceeded the value of the assets of those plans by approximately $450
million. U.S. law provides that we must make contributions to the pension plans during the reminder
of 2009 of at least $16.0 million. We may be required to make additional contributions to the plans
in later years if the value of the plan assets does not increase, or continues to decrease, and
these amounts could be significantly larger than the required contributions in 2009. We may also
choose to make additional, voluntary contributions to the plans.
As of July 5, 2009, we had contractual purchase commitments with suppliers, primarily for raw
materials and manufacturing services and for some non-production items, of approximately $625.5
million through 2011. If our actual revenues in the future are lower than our current expectations,
we may not meet all of our buying commitments. As a result, it is possible that we will have to
make penalty-type payments under these contracts, even though we are not obtaining any products
that we can sell.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized goodwill and identified intangible
asset impairment charges of $541.6 million. At July 5, 2009, we had $988.5 million of goodwill and
identified intangible assets. If economic conditions worsen and our revenues decline below our
recent forecasts, we may recognize additional impairment of our assets.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are our primary source of liquidity. We
believe that our existing liquid resources and cash generated from operations will be adequate to
meet our operating and capital requirements and other obligations, including repayment of our
outstanding convertible subordinated notes as they mature, for the next twelve months and beyond.
We may find it desirable to obtain additional debt or equity financing or seek to refinance our
existing convertible notes. We believe that financing is currently difficult for many companies to
obtain on acceptable terms or at all. Accordingly, such financing may not be available to us at all
or on acceptable terms if we determine that it would be desirable to obtain additional financing.
Moreover, any future equity or convertible debt financing may decrease the percentage of equity
ownership of existing stockholders and may result in dilution, depending on the price at which the
equity is sold or the debt is converted.
|
|
|
We depend on outside suppliers to manufacture, assemble, package and test our products;
accordingly, any failure to secure and maintain sufficient manufacturing capacity or to
maintain the quality of our products could harm our business and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to qualify our semiconductor products or our suppliers manufacturing lines with
key customers could harm our business and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Any defects in our products could harm our reputation, customer relationships and results
of operations. |
|
|
|
|
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims and litigation, which
could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to protect or assert our intellectual property rights, our business and
results of operations may be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
A decline in the revenue that we derive from the licensing of intellectual property could
have a significant impact on our net income. |
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to legal, business, political and economic risks associated with our
international operations. |
|
|
|
|
We use indirect channels of product distribution over which we have limited control. |
|
|
|
|
We may engage in acquisitions and strategic alliances, which may not be successful and
could harm our business and operating results. |
|
|
|
|
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, which may cause our operating results to
fluctuate. |
|
|
|
|
Our failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees could harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our operations and our suppliers operations are subject to natural disasters and other
events outside of our control that may disrupt our business and harm our operating results. |
33
|
|
|
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose
substantial costs on us and may harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our blank check preferred stock and Delaware law contain provisions that may inhibit
potential acquisition bids, which may harm our stock price, discourage merger offers or
prevent changes in our management. |
|
|
|
|
Class action litigation due to stock price volatility or other factors could cause us to
incur substantial costs and divert our managements attention and resources. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our annual meeting of stockholders on May 14, 2009. At the meeting, the stockholders
elected nine directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected,
ratified the Audit Committees selection of our independent auditors for 2009 and approved our
amended Incentive Plan.
The results of the voting for directors were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
Charles A. Haggerty |
|
|
510,114,704 |
|
|
|
48,283,957 |
|
|
|
2,101,611 |
|
Richard S. Hill |
|
|
536,759,550 |
|
|
|
21,523,074 |
|
|
|
2,217,649 |
|
John H.F. Miner |
|
|
525,145,803 |
|
|
|
33,117,021 |
|
|
|
2,237,448 |
|
Arun Netravali |
|
|
524,031,670 |
|
|
|
33,964,313 |
|
|
|
2,504,290 |
|
Matthew J. ORourke |
|
|
543,148,022 |
|
|
|
15,067,005 |
|
|
|
2,285,246 |
|
Gregorio Reyes |
|
|
543,954,973 |
|
|
|
14,286,912 |
|
|
|
2,258,387 |
|
Michael G. Strachan |
|
|
548,683,772 |
|
|
|
9,535,999 |
|
|
|
2,280,501 |
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar |
|
|
544,376,220 |
|
|
|
14,062,195 |
|
|
|
2,061,859 |
|
Susan M. Whitney |
|
|
543,506,101 |
|
|
|
14,597,445 |
|
|
|
2,396,727 |
|
The vote on the ratification of the Audit Committees selection of our independent auditors
for 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
546,782,847
|
|
12,569,729
|
|
1,147,695 |
The vote on the proposal to approve our amended Incentive Plan was:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
507,485,473
|
|
50,656,863
|
|
2,357,884 |
Item 6. Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index, which follows the signature page to this report.
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 11, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Bryon Look
|
|
|
|
Bryon Look |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Administrative Officer |
|
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 |
|
LSI Corporation Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 18, 2009) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
36