e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended November 29, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-7275
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
47-0248710
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One
ConAgra Drive, Omaha, Nebraska
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
68102-5001
(Zip Code) |
(402) 240-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of issuers common stock, as of December 27, 2009, was 443,405,103.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirteen and
Twenty-six Weeks ended November 29, 2009 and November 23, 2008
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the
Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks ended November 29, 2009 and November 23, 2008
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 29, 2009, May 31,
2009, and November 23, 2008
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-six
Weeks ended November 29, 2009 and November 23, 2008
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Index |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.7
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 12
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 101.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in millions except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,172.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,251.7 |
|
|
$ |
6,134.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,308.2 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
2,317.3 |
|
|
|
2,565.2 |
|
|
|
4,562.2 |
|
|
|
5,030.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
460.0 |
|
|
|
389.0 |
|
|
|
886.4 |
|
|
|
757.7 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity method investment earnings |
|
|
354.7 |
|
|
|
254.8 |
|
|
|
603.3 |
|
|
|
427.5 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
208.4 |
|
|
|
150.6 |
|
Equity method investment earnings |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
243.2 |
|
|
|
172.1 |
|
|
|
409.7 |
|
|
|
279.7 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
331.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
239.2 |
|
|
$ |
168.5 |
|
|
$ |
404.4 |
|
|
$ |
610.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. |
|
$ |
239.7 |
|
|
$ |
168.1 |
|
|
$ |
405.6 |
|
|
$ |
610.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra
Foods, Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra
Foods, Inc. common stockholders |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra
Foods, Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra
Foods, Inc. common stockholders |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income |
|
$ |
239.2 |
|
|
$ |
168.5 |
|
|
$ |
404.4 |
|
|
$ |
610.9 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising
during the period |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in
net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Currency translation adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized translation gains (losses) arising
during the period |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
(96.1 |
) |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
(120.5 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities, net of tax |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
253.5 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
419.0 |
|
|
|
489.5 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. |
|
$ |
254.0 |
|
|
$ |
71.8 |
|
|
$ |
420.2 |
|
|
$ |
489.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
490.2 |
|
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
|
$ |
132.1 |
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $10.2, $13.9, and $14.4 |
|
|
861.6 |
|
|
|
781.4 |
|
|
|
972.1 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,192.2 |
|
|
|
2,025.1 |
|
|
|
2,275.3 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
307.9 |
|
|
|
282.0 |
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,851.9 |
|
|
|
3,336.6 |
|
|
|
3,840.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
5,455.2 |
|
|
|
5,301.5 |
|
|
|
5,147.9 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(2,765.2 |
) |
|
|
(2,661.1 |
) |
|
|
(2,589.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,690.0 |
|
|
|
2,640.4 |
|
|
|
2,558.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,494.0 |
|
|
|
3,491.3 |
|
|
|
3,474.4 |
|
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net |
|
|
834.7 |
|
|
|
835.3 |
|
|
|
824.3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
695.9 |
|
|
|
768.1 |
|
|
|
1,062.6 |
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,566.5 |
|
|
$ |
11,073.3 |
|
|
$ |
11,770.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
300.1 |
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
|
260.5 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
956.4 |
|
|
|
823.8 |
|
|
|
1,019.5 |
|
Accrued payroll |
|
|
184.1 |
|
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
175.5 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
605.3 |
|
|
|
555.6 |
|
|
|
860.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,007.5 |
|
|
|
1,574.7 |
|
|
|
2,671.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments |
|
|
3,027.2 |
|
|
|
3,265.4 |
|
|
|
2,856.6 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
195.9 |
|
|
|
195.9 |
|
|
|
195.9 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
1,351.3 |
|
|
|
1,316.4 |
|
|
|
1,271.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,581.9 |
|
|
|
6,352.4 |
|
|
|
6,996.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued
567,895,641, 567,154,823, and 567,075,215 |
|
|
2,839.6 |
|
|
|
2,835.9 |
|
|
|
2,835.5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
879.4 |
|
|
|
884.4 |
|
|
|
788.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
4,274.8 |
|
|
|
4,042.5 |
|
|
|
3,844.9 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(89.1 |
) |
|
|
(103.7 |
) |
|
|
165.1 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost, 124,855,099, 125,497,708, and 119,984,111
common shares |
|
|
(2,920.1 |
) |
|
|
(2,938.2 |
) |
|
|
(2,859.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
4,984.6 |
|
|
|
4,720.9 |
|
|
|
4,774.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,566.5 |
|
|
$ |
11,073.3 |
|
|
$ |
11,770.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
404.4 |
|
|
$ |
610.9 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
331.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
409.7 |
|
|
|
279.7 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
165.1 |
|
|
|
154.9 |
|
Impairment charges related to Garner accident |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries recognized related to Garner accident |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Gain on sale of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
Distributions from affiliates greater than current earnings |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Share-based payments expense |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Non-cash interest income on payment-in-kind notes |
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities before effects of business
acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(76.6 |
) |
|
|
(99.6 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(171.8 |
) |
|
|
(339.2 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
150.3 |
|
|
|
248.1 |
|
Accrued payroll |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
(80.5 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities continuing operations |
|
|
653.5 |
|
|
|
114.0 |
|
Net cash flows from operating activities discontinued operations |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(729.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
657.2 |
|
|
|
(615.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(241.9 |
) |
|
|
(221.1 |
) |
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Sale of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
Purchase of businesses and intangible assets |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(76.3 |
) |
Notes receivable and other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(232.0 |
) |
|
|
(251.8 |
) |
Net cash flows from investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,252.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
$ |
(225.6 |
) |
|
$ |
2,001.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(285.6 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt by variable interest entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(57.5 |
) |
Repurchase of ConAgra Foods common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900.0 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(169.2 |
) |
|
|
(178.2 |
) |
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
Other items |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(188.9 |
) |
|
|
(1,403.8 |
) |
Net cash flows from financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
(188.9 |
) |
|
|
(1,403.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
247.0 |
|
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
Discontinued operations cash activity included above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
243.2 |
|
|
|
140.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
490.2 |
|
|
$ |
132.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Twenty-six Weeks ended November 29, 2009 and November 23, 2008
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and
cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as
otherwise noted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the ConAgra Foods, Inc.
(the Company, we, us, or our) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31,
2009.
The results of operations for any quarter or a partial fiscal year period are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for other periods or the full fiscal year.
Basis of Consolidation The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable
interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in
our condensed consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All
significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates The investments in and the operating results of
50%-or-less-owned entities not required to be consolidated are included in the condensed
consolidated financial statements on the basis of the equity method of accounting or the cost
method of accounting, depending on specific facts and circumstances.
We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in
business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully
recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary might include the absence of
an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to
sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where
applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the
investment. Managements assessment as to whether any decline in value is other than temporary is
based on our ability and intent to hold the investment and whether evidence indicating the carrying
value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the
contrary. Management generally considers our investments in equity method investees to be strategic
long-term investments. Therefore, management completes its assessments with a long-term viewpoint.
If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the
decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write-down is recorded
based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less at the date of acquisition, including short-term time deposits and government
agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Shipping and Handling Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are included
in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments,
certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and
changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension and postretirement
health care plans. We generally deem our foreign investments to be essentially permanent in nature
and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting the
investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign
investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes
are provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency
translation adjustments. We reclassified $2.0 million of foreign currency translation net losses to
net income due to the disposal and substantial liquidation of foreign subsidiaries in the first
half of fiscal 2009.
8
The following details the income tax expense (benefit) on components of other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net derivative adjustment |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Changes In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued guidance on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest)
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance requires that
noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be reported as a component of stockholders equity in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets. However, securities of an issuer that are redeemable at the
option of the holder continue to be classified outside stockholders equity. The noncontrolling
interest holder in the potato processing venture, Lamb Weston BSW, LLC (Lamb Weston BSW or the
venture), has the contractual right to put its equity interest to us at a future date.
Accordingly, the noncontrolling interest in this venture is classified within other noncurrent
liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. This guidance also requires that earnings
or losses attributed to the noncontrolling interests be reported as part of consolidated earnings
and not as a separate component of income or expense and requires disclosure of the attribution of
consolidated earnings to the controlling and noncontrolling interests on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of earnings. We adopted the provisions of this guidance on a prospective
basis, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, as of the beginning of our fiscal
2010. We adopted the presentation and disclosure requirements of this guidance retrospectively in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance on business combinations that establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures the assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The provisions of
this guidance are effective for our business combinations occurring on or after June 1, 2009.
In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance which provides that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and
must be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. This guidance
was effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance for fair value measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This guidance was effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2009 for our financial
assets and liabilities, as well as for other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value
on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements. As of the beginning of fiscal 2010,
we adopted additional new guidance relating to nonrecurring fair value measurement requirements for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that requires
an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis
identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of
the following characteristics: the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, and the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the
right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable
interest entity. The provisions of this guidance are effective as of the beginning of our fiscal
2011. Earlier application is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this
guidance.
Use of Estimates Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in
the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year
presentation.
9
Subsequent Events We have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through January 5, 2010,
the date we issued these financial statements. Based on our evaluation, no material events have
occurred requiring disclosure.
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND DIVESTITURES
Fernandos® Operations
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed the divestiture of the Fernandos®
foodservice business for proceeds of approximately $6.4 million. Based on our estimate of proceeds
from the sale of this business, we recognized impairment charges totaling $8.9 million in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. No further significant gain or loss resulted from the completion of
the divestiture in the first half of fiscal 2010. We reflected the results of these operations as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the divested
Fernandos® business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale
within our consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to the divestiture.
Trading and Merchandising Operations
On March 27, 2008, we entered into an agreement with affiliates of Ospraie Special Opportunities
Fund to sell our commodity trading and merchandising operations conducted by ConAgra Trade Group
(previously principally reported as the Trading and Merchandising segment). The operations included
the domestic and international grain merchandising, fertilizer distribution, agricultural and
energy commodities trading and services, and grain, animal, and oil seed byproducts merchandising
and distribution business. In June 2008, the sale of the trading and merchandising operations was
completed for before-tax proceeds of: 1) approximately $2.2 billion in cash; net of transaction
costs (including incentive compensation amounts due to employees due to accelerated vesting); 2)
$550 million (original principal amount) of payment-in-kind debt securities issued by the purchaser
(the Notes) that were recorded at an initial estimated fair value of $479 million; 3) a
short-term receivable of $37 million due from the purchaser; and 4) a four-year warrant to acquire
approximately 5% of the issued common equity of the parent company of the divested operations,
which has been recorded at an estimated fair value of $1.8 million. We recognized an after-tax gain
on the disposition of approximately $294 million in the first half of fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2009, we collected the $37 million short-term receivable due from the purchaser. See
Note 4 for further discussion on the Notes.
We reflected the results of the divested trading and merchandising operations as discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
Summary of Operational Results
The summary comparative financial results of the discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
226.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating results from
discontinued operations before income
taxes |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
59.4 |
|
Gain from disposal of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
549.4 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(218.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
331.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related to
certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.
10
The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale as of May 31, 2009 and November 23, 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Inventories |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Divestitures
In July 2008, we completed the sale of our Pemmican® beef jerky business for proceeds of
approximately $29.4 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $19.4 million ($10.6
million, after-tax), reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. Due to our
continuing involvement with the Pemmican® business through providing sales and
distribution services, the results of operations of the Pemmican® business have not been
reclassified as discontinued operations.
3. ACQUISITIONS
On September 22, 2008, we acquired a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, a potato processing
venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. (Ochoa), for approximately $46 million in cash. Lamb
Weston BSW subsequently distributed $20 million of our initial investment to us. This venture is
considered a variable interest entity and is consolidated in our financial statements (see Note 5).
Approximately $19 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and approximately $11
million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other identifiable intangibles. This business is
included in the Commercial Foods segment.
On August 1, 2008, we acquired Saroni Sugar & Rice, Inc., a distribution company included in the
Commercial Foods segment, for approximately $9 million in cash plus assumed liabilities.
Approximately $5 million of the purchase price was allocated to brands, trademarks and other
identifiable intangibles.
4. PAYMENT-IN-KIND NOTES RECEIVABLE
In connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations, we received the
Notes described in Note 2 that were recorded at an initial estimated fair value of $479 million.
The Notes were issued in three tranches: $99,990,000 original principal amount of 10.5% notes due
June 19, 2010; $200,035,000 original principal amount of 10.75% notes due June 19, 2011; and
$249,975,000 original principal amount of 11.0% notes due June 19, 2012.
The Notes permit payment of interest in cash or additional notes. The Notes may be redeemed in
whole or in part prior to maturity at the option of the issuer of the Notes. Redemption is at par
plus accrued interest. The Notes contain certain covenants that govern the issuers ability to make
restricted payments and enter into certain affiliate transactions. The Notes also provide for the
making of mandatory offers to repurchase upon certain change of control events involving the
purchaser, their co-investors, or their affiliates. In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we
received a cash interest payment on the Notes of $30 million from the purchaser. All subsequent
interest payments have been made in-kind. The Note due June 19, 2010, which is classified within
prepaid expenses and other current assets, had a carrying value of $107 million at November 29,
2009. The Notes due June 19, 2011 and June 19, 2012, which are classified as other assets, had a
total carrying value of $455 million at November 29, 2009.
Based on market interest rates of comparable instruments provided by third-party advisors, we
estimated the fair market value of the Notes was $588 million at November 29, 2009.
5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
As discussed in Note 3, in September 2008, we entered into a potato processing venture, Lamb Weston
BSW. We provide all sales and marketing services to the venture. Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on
an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining
equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the call option). Commencing on July 30, 2011, or
on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we are subject to a contractual obligation to
purchase all of Ochoas equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the put
option). The purchase prices under the call option and the
11
put option (the options) are based on the book value of Ochoas equity interest at the date of
exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment
balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of
the options are exercised. We have determined that the venture is a variable interest entity and
that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial
statements of the venture.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we established a line of credit with Lamb Weston BSW, under
which we will lend up to $1.5 million to Lamb Weston BSW, due on August 24, 2010. Borrowings under
the line of credit, which are subordinate to Lamb Weston BSWs borrowings from a syndicate of
banks, bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3%.
Our variable interests in this venture include an equity investment in the venture, the options,
and the line of credit advanced to Lamb Weston BSW. Other than our equity investment in the
venture, the line of credit extended to the venture, and our sales and marketing services provided
to the venture, we have not provided financial support to this entity. Our maximum exposure to loss
as a result of our involvement with this venture is equal to our equity investment in the venture
and advances under the line of credit extended to the venture.
We also consolidate the assets and liabilities of several entities from which we lease corporate
aircraft. Each of these entities has been determined to be a variable interest entity and we have
been determined to be the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Under the terms of the
aircraft leases, we provide guarantees to the owners of these entities of a minimum residual value
of the aircraft at the end of the lease term. We also have fixed price purchase options on the
aircraft leased from these entities. Our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these
entities is limited to the difference between the fair value of the leased aircraft and the amount
of the residual value guarantees at the time we terminate the leases (the leases expire between
December 2011 and October 2012). The total amount of the residual value guarantees for these
aircraft at the end of the respective lease terms is $38.4 million.
Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected in our balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
114.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
140.1 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
157.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Accrued payroll |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments |
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities (noncontrolling interest) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
116.6 |
|
|
$ |
121.9 |
|
|
$ |
124.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent
additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of these entities have claims only on the
assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit. The assets
recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the venture and are not
available to us for any other purpose.
6. GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA ACCIDENT
On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North
Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded
meat snacks, and the packaging area of the plant is expected to be out of service for the
foreseeable future. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release,
and not a deliberate act.
12
We maintain comprehensive property (including business interruption), workers compensation, and
general liability insurance policies with very significant loss limits that we believe will provide
substantial and broad coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this accident.
The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized, to date, are reflected in our condensed
consolidated financial statements, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended November 29, 2009 |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009 |
|
|
Consumer
Foods |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Consumer
Foods |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-downs and
other costs |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset impairments,
clean-up costs, etc. |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
Insurance recoveries recognized |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general
and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in the table, above, exclude lost profits due to the interruption of the business.
We are currently unable to fully access the portion of the facility that was damaged in the
explosion. As a result, we are unable to ascertain whether or not certain equipment located in the
facility, with a book value of approximately $12 million, is impaired. We may be required to
recognize further impairment charges for some, or all, of this amount when we are able to fully
access the site and ascertain the status of the equipment. We expect to be able to ascertain the
status of the equipment in the second half of fiscal 2010. We expect to be reimbursed by our
insurers for the cost of replacing these assets in the event that they are determined to be
impaired.
At November 29, 2009, we reflected approximately $15 million of expected insurance recoveries within
accounts receivable in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Through November 29, 2009, we had
received payment advances from the insurers of approximately $39 million for our initial insurance
claims for this matter. As of the date of this report, we have received payment advances in excess
of $53 million from insurers. Based on managements current assessment of production options, the
expected level of insurance proceeds, and the estimated potential amount of losses and impact on
the Slim Jim® brand, we do not believe that the accident will have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
7. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the first half of fiscal 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foods |
|
Foods |
|
Total |
Balance as of May 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,354.3 |
|
|
$ |
137.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,491.3 |
|
Translation and other |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 29, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,356.5 |
|
|
$ |
137.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,494.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
November 23, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Non-amortizing
intangible assets |
|
$ |
778.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
778.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
778.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Amortizing intangible
assets |
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
861.7 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
858.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
$ |
844.1 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.
Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a weighted average life of approximately 13 years, are
principally composed of licensing arrangements and customer relationships. Based on amortizing
assets recognized in our balance sheet as of November 29, 2009, amortization expense is estimated
to be approximately $6.2 million for each of the next five years.
8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the
cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the
normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the
use of derivatives.
Commodity futures and options contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity
input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, dairy, grains, and
electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity
inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular
commodities if deemed appropriate. As of November 29, 2009, we had economically hedged certain
portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with
expiration dates through March 2011.
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, when deemed
prudent, we enter into forward exchange or options contracts for transactions denominated in a
currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to,
hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of
finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of November
29, 2009, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated
transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through December 2012.
From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce
exposures related to changes in interest rates. No interest rate derivatives were outstanding
during the periods presented.
In prior periods, we have designated certain commodity-based and foreign currency derivatives as
cash flow hedges qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. We discontinued designating such
derivatives as cash flow hedges during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows
Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and, as noted above, we are not currently designating
any commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve hedge accounting treatment. We reflect
realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated
commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately
within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified
to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged
is recognized in cost of goods sold.
Other Derivative Activity (Primarily in the Milling Operations)
We also use derivative instruments within our milling operations, which are part of the Commercial
Foods segment. Derivative instruments used to economically hedge commodity inventories and forward
purchase and sales contracts are marked-to-market such that realized and unrealized gains and
losses are immediately included in operating results. The underlying inventory and forward
contracts being hedged are also marked-to-market with changes in market value recognized
immediately in operating results.
14
For commodity derivative trading activities within our milling operations that are not intended to
mitigate commodity input cost risk, the derivative instrument is marked-to-market each period with
gains and losses included in net sales of the Commercial Foods segment. There were no material
gains or losses from derivative trading activities during the periods being reported.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of
derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair
value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with
FASB guidance, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain
amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral,
where legal right of setoff exists. At November 29, 2009, amounts representing a right to reclaim
cash collateral of $8.5 million were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our
balance sheet.
Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral were
reflected in our balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|
$ |
203.4 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, on a gross basis, prior to the
offsetting of amounts where legal right of setoff existed at November 29, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
52.0 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under FASB
guidance |
|
|
|
$ |
52.6 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The location and amount of gains and losses from derivatives reported in our consolidated
statements of earnings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in Condensed |
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement |
|
|
in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings |
|
|
|
of Earnings of Gain |
|
|
For the Thirteen |
|
|
For the Twenty-six |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
weeks ended |
|
|
weeks ended |
|
Instruments Under FASB Guidance |
|
on Derivatives |
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative gain |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009, we recognized total stock-based
compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock units, performance shares, and
restricted cash) of $14.7 million and $26.7 million, respectively. For the thirteen and twenty-six
weeks ended November 23, 2008, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $10.2
million and $22.8 million, respectively. During the first half of fiscal 2010, we granted 1.1
million restricted stock units at a weighted average grant date price of $19.13, 7.8 million stock
options at a weighted average exercise price of $19.14, and 0.5 million performance shares at a
weighted average grant date price of $19.15.
The performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting
contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goals are based
upon our earnings before interest and taxes and our return on average invested capital
measured over a defined performance period. The awards actually earned will range from zero to
three hundred percent of the targeted number of performance shares and will be paid in shares of
common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the plan, any shares earned will be
distributed at the end of the three-year period. The value of the performance shares granted in
fiscal 2009 and 2010 is adjusted based upon the market price of our stock at the end of each
reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
The weighted average Black-Scholes assumptions for stock options granted during the first half of
fiscal 2010 were as follows:
15
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility (%) |
|
|
22.94 |
|
Dividend yield (%) |
|
|
3.77 |
|
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
|
2.31 |
|
Expected life of stock option (years) |
|
|
4.75 |
|
The weighted average value of stock options granted during the first half of fiscal 2010 was $2.73
per option, based upon a Black-Scholes methodology.
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares.
Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common
shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards, and other
dilutive securities.
The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and
diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common
stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common
stockholders |
|
$ |
243.7 |
|
|
$ |
171.7 |
|
|
$ |
410.9 |
|
|
$ |
279.3 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of tax, attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.
common stockholders |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
331.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
239.7 |
|
|
$ |
168.1 |
|
|
$ |
405.6 |
|
|
$ |
610.5 |
|
Less: Increase in redemption value of
noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings
allocated |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to ConAgra Foods,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
239.4 |
|
|
$ |
168.1 |
|
|
$ |
405.0 |
|
|
$ |
610.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
443.2 |
|
|
|
447.1 |
|
|
|
443.2 |
|
|
|
458.5 |
|
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options,
restricted stock awards, and other dilutive
securities |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
446.2 |
|
|
|
449.5 |
|
|
|
445.8 |
|
|
|
461.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, there were 29.8 million and 36.4 million
stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of shares
contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options because exercise prices exceeded the
average market value of our common stock during the period. For the second quarter and first half
of fiscal 2009, there were 34.5 million and 33.3 million stock options, respectively, excluded from
the calculation.
11. INVENTORIES
The major classes of inventories were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials and packaging |
|
$ |
740.1 |
|
|
$ |
636.3 |
|
|
$ |
745.7 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
120.0 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1,255.7 |
|
|
|
1,202.1 |
|
|
|
1,333.2 |
|
Supplies and other |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,192.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,025.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,275.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
12. RESTRUCTURING
2008-2009 Plan
During fiscal 2008, our board of directors approved a plan (2008-2009 plan) recommended by
executive management to improve the efficiency of our Consumer Foods operations and related
functional organizations and to streamline our international operations to reduce manufacturing and
selling, general, and administrative costs. The 2008-2009 plan, which was substantially completed
by the end of fiscal 2009, included the reorganization of the Consumer Foods operations, the
integration of the international headquarters functions into our domestic business, and exiting a
number of international markets. The total cost of this plan was $36.4 million, of which $0.1
million and $9.7 million were recorded during the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
No significant expenses were recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2009.
Expenses associated with this restructuring plan, included, but are not limited to, inventory
write-downs, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting and
employee relocation, etc.). Approximately $0.5 million, $2.7 million, and $8.1 million of
liabilities related to this plan remained outstanding at November 29, 2009, May 31, 2009, and
November 23, 2008, respectively. Included in the above costs are $26.5 million of charges which
have resulted in cash outflows and $9.9 million of non-cash charges.
2006-2008 Plan
As part of the 2006-2008 restructuring plan, we began construction of a new production facility in
fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the best use of this facility, the construction of which
is partially complete. We believe, based on our current assessment of likely scenarios, the
carrying value of this facility ($39.3 million at November 29, 2009) is recoverable. In the event
we determine that the future use of the new facility will not result in recovery of the recorded
value of the asset, an impairment charge would be required.
13. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009 was
$117.4 million and $84.6 million, respectively. Income tax expense from continuing operations for
the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009 was $208.4 million and $150.6 million, respectively. The
effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing
operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) from continuing operations was
approximately 33% and 34% for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, and
33% and 35% for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, respectively. The effective tax
rates for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected a benefit of approximately 2%
and 1%, respectively, from certain income tax credits and deductions identified in the current
period related to prior periods.
The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions, including positions
impacting only the timing of tax benefits, was $80.4 million as of November 29, 2009, $74.6 million
as of May 31, 2009, and $73.8 million as of November 23, 2008. The net amount of unrecognized tax
benefits at November 29, 2009, May 31, 2009, and November 23, 2008 that, if recognized, would
impact the Companys effective tax rate was $51.6 million, $51.0 million, and $50.0 million,
respectively. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on the Companys
effective tax rate. The gross unrecognized tax benefits exclude related liabilities for gross
interest and penalties of $16.7 million, $14.5 million, and $13.7 million as of November 29, 2009,
May 31, 2009, and November 23, 2008, respectively.
We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will
decrease by $8 million to $12 million over the next twelve months due to various federal, state,
and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.
14. CONTINGENCIES
In fiscal 1991, we acquired Beatrice Company (Beatrice). As a result of the acquisition and
the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former
subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated
with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various litigation and
environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to its acquisition by
the Company. The litigation includes several public nuisance and personal injury suits against a
number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products and the Company
as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated
by Beatrice until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New
Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The
Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief in the form of medical monitoring for
17
elevated levels of lead in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties have joined
in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance.
The environmental proceedings include litigation and administrative proceedings involving
Beatrices status as a potentially responsible party at 35 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or
state-equivalent sites; these sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors
of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs,
acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the
process of paying its liability share at 32 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been
established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates
include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required cleanup, the known volumetric
contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in
remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice environmental matters totaled $86.4 million as of
November 29, 2009, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites
referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice environmental matters to continue for up to
20 years.
In limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. At the time in
which we initially provide such a guarantee, we assess the risk of financial exposure to us under
these agreements. We consider the credit-worthiness of the guaranteed party, the value of any
collateral pledged against the related obligation, and any other factors that may mitigate our risk
(e.g., letters of credit from a financial institution). We periodically monitor market and
entity-specific conditions that may result in a change of our assessment of its risk of loss under
these agreements.
We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the 2002 divestiture of
our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed six
years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was approximately $17.2 million
as of November 29, 2009.
We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested fresh beef and pork business with respect
to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the divested business to purchase a
minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates minimum
price commitments, based in part on market prices, and, in certain circumstances, also includes
price adjustments based on certain inputs. We have not established a liability for any of the fresh
beef and pork divestiture-related guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our
required performance under the guarantees is remote.
We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply
agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under
certain conditions. At November 29, 2009, the amount of supplier loans we have effectively
guaranteed was approximately $16.0 million. We have not established a liability for these
guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the
guarantees is remote.
We are a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed repayment
of a loan of this supplier, under certain conditions. At November 29, 2009, the amount of this loan
was $25.0 million. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier, we have the contractual
right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us the rights to the underlying
collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we believe
the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this agreement is remote.
We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business,
including lawsuits and claims related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products and
litigation we initiated against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and
defense costs. We recognized a charge of $25.3 million during the second half of fiscal 2009 in
connection with the disputed coverage with this insurance carrier. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, a Delaware state court rendered a decision on certain
matters in our claim for the disputed coverage favorable to the
insurance carrier. We intend to appeal this decision and continue to
pursue this matter vigorously.
In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North
Carolina. See Note 6 for information related to this matter.
An investigation by the Division of Enforcement of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) of certain commodity futures transactions of a former Company subsidiary has led to an
investigation by the CFTC of the Company itself. The investigation may result in litigation by the
CFTC against the Company. The former subsidiary was sold on June 23, 2008, as part of the
divestiture of our trading and merchandising operations. The CFTCs Division of Enforcement has
advised the Company that it questions whether certain trading activities of the former subsidiary
violated the Commodity Exchange Act and that the CFTC has been evaluating whether we should be
implicated in the matter based on the existence of the parent-subsidiary relationship between the
two entities at the time of the trades. Based on information we have learned to date, the Company
believes that both it and the former subsidiary have meritorious
defenses. There have been discussions with the CFTC concerning
resolution of this matter. We also believe the
sale contract with the purchaser of the business provides us indemnification rights. Accordingly,
we do
18
not believe any decision by the CFTC to pursue this matter will have a material adverse effect on
the Company. If litigation ensues, the Company intends to defend itself vigorously.
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management
believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is reasonably possible that a change
in one of the estimates of the foregoing matters may occur in the future. Costs of legal services
are recognized in earnings as services are provided.
15. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We have defined benefit retirement plans (plans) for eligible salaried and hourly employees.
Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each
year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental
benefits (other postretirement benefits) to qualifying U.S. employees.
Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
(80.6 |
) |
|
|
(79.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Settlement cost |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost - Company plans |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Pension benefit cost - multi-employer plans |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit cost |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost - Company plans |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, we contributed $14.4 million and
$17.1 million, respectively, to our pension plans and contributed $6.4 million and $15.2 million,
respectively, to our other postretirement plans. Based upon the current funded status of the plans
and the current interest rate environment, we anticipate making further contributions of
approximately $9.0 million to our pension plans for the remainder of fiscal 2010. We anticipate
making further contributions of $18.0 million to our other postretirement plans during the
remainder of fiscal 2010. These estimates are based on current tax laws, plan asset performance,
and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.
16. LONG-TERM DEBT
As of May 31, 2009 and November 23, 2008, $9.2 million and $300.0 million, respectively, of senior
debt due August 2027 was included in current installments of long-term debt due to the existence of
a put option that was exercisable by the holders of this senior debt from June 1, 2009 to July 1,
2009. As part of debt refinancing activities in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we repaid $290.8
million of this senior debt. We reclassified the amount not put by the holders to senior long-term
debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, when the put option expired.
19
We consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. During the second quarter of fiscal
2009, Lamb Weston BSW entered into a term loan agreement with a bank under which it borrowed $20.0
million of senior debt at an annual interest rate of 4.34% due September 2018. During the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, Lamb Weston BSW restructured and repaid this debt and entered into a term
loan agreement with a bank under which it borrowed $40.0 million of variable interest rate debt due in June 2018.
17. ACCELERATED SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
We completed an accelerated share repurchase program during fiscal 2009. We paid $900 million and
received 38.4 million shares in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 when the program was initiated.
We received an additional 5.6 million shares in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 under this
program.
18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB guidance on fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, was effective as of
the beginning of our fiscal 2009 for our financial assets and liabilities, as well as for other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated
financial statements. As of the beginning of fiscal 2010, we adopted additional new guidance
relating to nonrecurring fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. These include long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and certain
investments. These items are recognized at fair value when they are considered to be other than
temporarily impaired. In the first half of fiscal 2010, there were no required fair value
measurements for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs)
used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as
follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,
Level 2 Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in inactive markets, and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon
the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November
29, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Deferred compensation assets |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
Deferred and share-based compensation liabilities |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $3.5 billion as of
November 29, 2009. Based on current market rates provided primarily by outside investment bankers,
the fair value of this debt at November 29, 2009 was estimated at $3.9 billion.
19. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods. The
Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded, private label, and customized food products,
which are sold in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The
products include a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts)
across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes. The Commercial Foods reporting
segment includes commercially
20
branded foods and ingredients, which are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and
industrial customers. The Commercial Foods segments primary products include: specialty potato
products, milled grain ingredients, a variety of vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and
flavors which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston®, ConAgra Mills®,
Gilroy Foods & FlavorsTM, and Spicetec®.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed the transition of the direct management of
the Consumer Foods reporting segment from the Chief Executive Officer to the Consumer Foods
President position. In conjunction with this organizational change, beginning in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010, we aligned our segment reporting to be consistent with the manner in which our
operating results are presented to, and reviewed by, our Chief Executive Officer. All prior periods
have been recast to reflect these changes.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we transferred the management of the Alexia®
frozen food operations from the Consumer Foods segment to the Commercial Foods segment. Segment
results have been recast to reflect this change.
****
Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of
the primary segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General
corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
2,078.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,017.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,938.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,866.3 |
|
Commercial Foods |
|
|
1,094.5 |
|
|
|
1,234.7 |
|
|
|
2,195.8 |
|
|
|
2,441.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
3,172.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,251.7 |
|
|
$ |
6,134.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,308.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
|
$ |
579.9 |
|
|
$ |
437.5 |
|
Commercial Foods |
|
|
159.7 |
|
|
|
157.7 |
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
291.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
$ |
489.7 |
|
|
$ |
408.9 |
|
|
$ |
880.4 |
|
|
$ |
729.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method investment earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
Commercial Foods |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity method investment earnings |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit plus equity method investment earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
331.0 |
|
|
$ |
252.0 |
|
|
$ |
581.1 |
|
|
$ |
439.6 |
|
Commercial Foods |
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
158.8 |
|
|
|
314.1 |
|
|
|
292.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit plus equity method investment earnings |
|
$ |
495.6 |
|
|
$ |
410.8 |
|
|
$ |
895.2 |
|
|
$ |
731.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses |
|
$ |
94.4 |
|
|
$ |
111.4 |
|
|
$ |
195.0 |
|
|
$ |
208.8 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
208.4 |
|
|
|
150.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
|
$ |
172.1 |
|
|
$ |
409.7 |
|
|
$ |
279.7 |
|
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. |
|
$ |
243.7 |
|
|
$ |
171.7 |
|
|
$ |
410.9 |
|
|
$ |
279.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Net sales by product type within each segment were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenient Meals |
|
$ |
698.8 |
|
|
$ |
649.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,341.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,266.7 |
|
Snacks |
|
|
322.2 |
|
|
|
333.0 |
|
|
|
618.1 |
|
|
|
641.4 |
|
Meal Enhancers |
|
|
282.6 |
|
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
527.8 |
|
|
|
476.6 |
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
774.5 |
|
|
|
788.2 |
|
|
|
1,451.1 |
|
|
|
1,481.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
2,078.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,017.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,938.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,866.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Foods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Potatoes |
|
$ |
567.2 |
|
|
$ |
579.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,131.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,128.8 |
|
Milled Products |
|
|
354.1 |
|
|
|
464.3 |
|
|
|
722.5 |
|
|
|
948.0 |
|
Seasonings, Blends, and Flavors |
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
186.7 |
|
|
|
202.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
155.4 |
|
|
|
162.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Foods |
|
$ |
1,094.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,234.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,195.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,441.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
3,172.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,251.7 |
|
|
$ |
6,134.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,308.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
In fiscal 2009, following the sale of our trading and merchandising operations and related
organizational changes, we transferred the management of commodity hedging activities (except for
those related to our milling operations) to a centralized procurement group. Beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, we began to reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from
derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to hedge anticipated
commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and
losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item
being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold. We believe this change results in
better segment management focus on key operational initiatives and improved transparency to
derivative gains and losses.
Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge
accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency
risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market
value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The
gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in
the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.
The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted
commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations, under this methodology:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
(45.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(79.2 |
) |
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate
expenses |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
(47.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(80.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Commercial Foods |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(13.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect
to reclassify losses of $5.1 million and $1.6 million to segment operating results in the second
half of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be
allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2010 and 2011 include $5.3 million of losses
incurred during fiscal 2009.
We also use derivative instruments within our milling operations, which are part of the Commercial
Foods segment. Derivative instruments used to economically hedge commodity inventories and forward
purchase and sales contracts are marked-to-market such that realized and unrealized gains and
losses are immediately included in operating results. The underlying inventory and forward
contracts being hedged are also marked-to-market with changes in market value recognized
immediately in operating results. For commodity derivative trading activities within our milling
operations that are not intended to mitigate commodity input cost risk, the derivative instrument
is marked-to-market each period with gains and losses included in net sales of the Commercial Foods
segment. In the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, there were no material gains or losses from
derivative trading activities.
Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18% of
consolidated net sales in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, and 17% and 16% of
consolidated net sales in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, respectively, primarily
in the Consumer Foods segment.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 15% of consolidated net
receivables as of November 29, 2009, May 31, 2009, and November 23, 2008, primarily in the Consumer
Foods segment.
24
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part I - Financial Information
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report, including Managements Discussion & Analysis, contains forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on managements current views and assumptions of future events and
financial performance and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Readers of this
report should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many
factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to vary materially from the
expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this report.
These factors include, among other things: availability and prices of raw materials; the impact of
the accident at the Garner, North Carolina manufacturing facility, including the ultimate costs
incurred and the amounts received under insurance policies; product pricing; future economic
circumstances; industry conditions; our ability to execute our operating plans; the success of our
innovation, marketing, and cost savings initiatives; competitive environment and related market
conditions; operating efficiencies; the ultimate impact of recalls; access to capital; actions of
governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses; and other risks described in our
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue
reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report which speak only as of the date
of this report.
The following discussion should be read together with our financial statements and related notes
contained in this report and with the financial statements, related notes, and Managements
Discussion & Analysis in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.
Results for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended November 29, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of results that may be attained in the future.
Fiscal 2010 Second Quarter Executive Overview
ConAgra Foods, Inc. (NYSE: CAG) is one of North Americas leading food companies, with brands in
97% of Americas households. Consumers find Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Egg
Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunts®,
Marie Callenders®, Orville Redenbachers®, PAM®, Peter
Pan®, Reddi-wip®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands in grocery,
convenience, mass merchandise, and club stores. We also have a strong business-to-business
presence, supplying potato, as well as other vegetable, spice, and grain products to a variety of
well-known restaurants, foodservice operators, and commercial customers.
Diluted earnings per share were $0.54 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, including earnings of
$0.55 per share from continuing operations and a loss of $0.01 per share from discontinued
operations. Diluted earnings per share were $0.37 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, including
earnings of $0.38 per share from continuing operations and a loss of $0.01 per share from
discontinued operations. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year
results of continuing operations (see Items Impacting Comparability below).
Items Impacting Comparability
Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for hedging of anticipated commodity
input costs and hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks is discussed in the segment review
below.
Items of note impacting comparability for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 included
the following:
Reported within Continuing Operations
|
|
|
a benefit of $9 million of a lower-than-planned income tax rate. |
Items of note impacting comparability for first half of fiscal 2009 included the following:
Reported within Continuing Operations
|
|
|
a gain of $19 million ($11 million after-tax) on the sale of the
Pemmican® beef jerky business and |
|
|
|
charges totaling $10 million ($9 million after-tax) for costs under our
restructuring plans. |
Reported within Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
a gain of $490 million ($294 million after-tax) on the sale of the trading and
merchandising business. |
25
Garner, North Carolina Accident
On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North
Carolina (the Garner accident). This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim
Jim® branded meat snacks, and the packaging area of the plant is expected to be out of
service for the foreseeable future. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental
natural gas release, and not a deliberate act.
We maintain comprehensive property (including business interruption), workers compensation, and
general liability insurance policies with very significant loss limits that we believe will provide
substantial and broad coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this accident.
The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized, to date, are reflected in our condensed
consolidated financial statements, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended November 29, 2009 |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009 |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foods |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Foods |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-downs and
other costs |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset impairments,
clean-up costs, etc. |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
Insurance recoveries recognized |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general
and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in the table, above, exclude lost profits due to the interruption of the business.
We are currently unable to access the portion of the facility that was damaged in the explosion. As
a result, we are unable to ascertain whether or not certain equipment located in the facility, with
a book value of approximately $12 million, is impaired. We may be required to recognize further
impairment charges for some, or all, of this amount when we are able to access the site and
ascertain the status of the equipment. We expect to be able to ascertain the status of the
equipment in the second half of fiscal 2010. We expect to be reimbursed by our insurers for the
cost of replacing these assets in the event that they are determined to be impaired.
At November 29, 2009, we reflected approximately $15 million of expected insurance recoveries
within accounts receivable in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Through November 29, 2009,
we had received payment advances from the insurers of approximately $39 million for our initial
insurance claims for this matter. As of the date of this report, we have received payment advances
in excess of $53 million from insurers. While we expect to
receive substantial advance payments from insurance carriers in
fiscal 2010, we anticipate final settlement of the claim will not
occur until fiscal 2011. Based on managements current assessment of production
options, the expected level of insurance proceeds, and the estimated potential amount of losses and
impact on the Slim Jim® brand, we do not believe that the accident will have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
Sweet Potato Investment
In August 2009, we announced plans to build a new, environmentally friendly potato processing plant
near Delhi, Louisiana, designed primarily to process sweet potatoes from the region into french
fries and related products. The new plant is scheduled to open in the fall of 2010.
Segment Review
We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods.
26
Consumer Foods
The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded and private label food products that are sold
in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The products include a
variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) across frozen,
refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed the transition of the direct management of
the Consumer Foods reporting segment from the Chief Executive Officer to the Consumer Foods
President position. In conjunction with this organizational change, beginning with the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, we have aligned our segment reporting to be consistent with the manner in
which our operating results are presented to, and reviewed by, our Chief Executive Officer. All
prior periods have been recast to reflect these changes.
In June 2009, we completed the divestiture of the Fernandos® foodservice brand for
proceeds of approximately $6.4 million. We reflect the results of these operations as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the divested
Fernandos® business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale
within our consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to divestiture.
Commercial Foods
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded foods and ingredients, which
are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segments
primary products include: specialty potato products, milled grain ingredients, a variety of
vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and flavors, which are sold under brands such as ConAgra
Mills®, Lamb Weston®, Gilroy Foods & FlavorsTM, and
Spicetec®.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we transferred the management of the Alexia®
frozen food operations from the Consumer Foods segment to the Commercial Foods segment. Segment
results have been recast to reflect this change.
Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) in Segment Results
In fiscal 2009, following the sale of our trading and merchandising operations and related
organizational changes, we transferred the management of commodity hedging activities (except for
those related to our milling operations) to a centralized procurement group. Beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, we began to reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from
derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to hedge anticipated
commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and
losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item
being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold. We
believe this change results in better segment management focus on key operational initiatives and
improved transparency to derivative gains and losses.
Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge
accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency
risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market
value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The
gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in
the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.
The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted
commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations, under this methodology:
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
November 29, |
|
November 23, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
(45.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(79.2 |
) |
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate
expenses |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
(47.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(80.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Commercial Foods |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(13.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect
to reclassify losses of $5.1 million and $1.6 million to segment operating results in the second
half of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be
allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2010 and 2011 include $5.3 million of losses
incurred during fiscal 2009.
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net Sales |
Reporting Segment |
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
% Inc |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
% Inc |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dec) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dec) |
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Commercial Foods |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,173 |
|
|
$ |
3,252 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
6,134 |
|
|
$ |
6,308 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $3.17 billion, a decrease of $79 million,
or 2%, from the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Net sales for the first half of fiscal 2010 were
$6.13 billion, a decrease of $174 million, or 3%, from the first half of fiscal 2009. The decrease
in net sales for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, as compared to the second
quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, was largely due to lower sales in the flour milling business
in our Commercial Foods segment. This was driven by the pass-through of lower wheat costs to
customers.
Consumer Foods net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $2.08 billion, an increase of
$61 million, or 3%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Results reflected increased
volume of 2% and net pricing and mix improvement of 1%. Consumer Foods net sales for the first
half of fiscal 2010 were $3.94 billion, an increase of $72 million, or 2%, compared to the first
half of fiscal 2009, reflecting a 2% improvement in net pricing and mix and essentially flat
volumes. Increased volumes in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, as compared to the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, reflected successful innovation and marketing, particularly in the frozen meals
category. Volumes were negatively impacted by approximately 1% in the second quarter and first
half of fiscal 2010, due to the limited supply of certain Slim Jim® products as a result
of the June 2009 Garner, North Carolina plant accident. Volumes were also negatively impacted by
approximately 1% in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, due to our elimination of
certain low-margin SKUs and our decision to reduce our presence in certain low-margin channels and
geographic markets. The effect of foreign currency exchange rates did not have a significant impact
on net sales for the second quarter or first half of fiscal 2010.
Sales of Healthy Choice® and Banquet® frozen meals increased by 10% and 6%,
respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal
2009, driven by the introduction of new products and related marketing programs. Sales of products
associated with some of our other most significant brands, including Chef Boyardee®,
Hebrew National®, Hunts®, Marie Callenders®, Orville
Redenbachers®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®,
Snack Pak®, and
Swiss Miss®, grew in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Sales of Slim Jim®
meat snack products declined by 12% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, as compared to the second
quarter of fiscal 2009, largely due to the impact of the Garner accident. Other significant brands
whose products experienced sales declines in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 include ACT
II®, Blue Bonnet®, Egg Beaters®, Kid Cuisine®,
PAM®, and Wesson®.
Commercial Foods net sales were $1.10 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of
$140 million, or 11%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Commercial Foods net sales
were $2.20 billion for the first half of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $246
28
million, or 10%, compared
to the first half of fiscal 2009. Results reflected the pass-through of lower wheat prices by the
segments flour milling operations, resulting in a reduction of net sales of $110 million and $225
million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, as compared to the comparable periods
of fiscal 2009. Results also reflected higher selling prices in our Lamb Weston®
specialty potato products business, partially offset by reduced volume in the specialty potato and
foods and flavors businesses, reflecting the difficult economic environment in the foodservice
channel. Net sales from Lamb Weston BSW, a business acquired in the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
were $17 million and $36 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively,
and $15 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $460 million for the second quarter of fiscal
2010, an increase of $71 million, or 18%, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 included the
following:
|
|
|
an increase in incentive compensation expense of $39 million, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in advertising and promotion expenses of $24 million, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in stock compensation expense of $7 million, and |
|
|
|
|
a net benefit of $4 million, representing costs associated with the Garner accident, more
than offset by insurance recoveries. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $886 million for the first half of fiscal
2010, an increase of $129 million, or 17%, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the first half of fiscal 2010 included the following:
|
|
|
an increase in incentive compensation expense of $63 million, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in advertising and promotion expenses of $29 million, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in stock compensation expense of $7 million, |
|
|
|
|
a net benefit of $7 million, representing costs associated with the Garner accident, more
than offset by insurance recoveries, and |
|
|
|
|
charges related to the peanut butter and pot pie recalls of $4 million. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first half of fiscal 2009 included:
|
|
|
a $19 million gain on the disposition of the Pemmican® business, |
|
|
|
|
charges of approximately $10 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans, |
|
|
|
|
a gain of $5 million on the sale of a facility in our Commercial Foods segment, and |
|
|
|
|
charges related to the peanut butter and pot pie recalls of $4 million. |
Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Operating Profit |
Reporting Segment |
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Inc |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Inc |
|
Consumer Foods |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
580 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Commercial Foods |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Consumer Foods operating profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was $330 million, an increase
of $79 million, or 31%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross profits were $105
million higher for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 than for
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, driven by the impact of higher net sales, discussed above, lower
commodity input costs (particularly vegetable oils), and the benefit of supply chain cost savings
initiatives. Consumer Foods selling, general and administrative expenses
29
were higher in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 than in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 due, in part, to an $18 million
increase in incentive compensation expenses and a $24 million increase in advertising and promotion
expenses. The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in an increase
of operating profit of $3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to the second
quarter of fiscal 2009.
Consumer Foods operating profit for the first half of fiscal 2010 was $580 million, an increase of
$142 million, or 32%, compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. Gross profits were $187 million
higher for the first half of fiscal 2010 than for the first half of fiscal 2009 driven by the
impact of higher net sales, discussed above, lower commodity input costs (particularly vegetable
oils), and the benefit of supply chain cost savings initiatives. Consumer Foods selling, general
and administrative expenses were higher in the first half of fiscal 2010 than in the first half of
fiscal 2009, reflecting a $23 million increase in incentive compensation expenses and a $27 million
increase in advertising and promotion expenses. The Consumer Foods segment recognized a $19 million
gain on the sale of the Pemmican® brand and incurred costs of $8 million in connection
with our restructuring plans in the first half of fiscal 2009. The strengthening of the U.S.
dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in a reduction of operating profit of approximately
$13 million in the first half of fiscal 2010, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009.
The Garner accident in June 2009 resulted in charges totaling $8 million and $45 million for the
impairment of property, plant and equipment, inventory write-offs, workers compensation, site
clean-up, and other related costs in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010,
respectively. The impact of these charges was partially offset by insurance recoveries of $7
million and $41 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, for the
involuntary conversion of assets. Gross profits from Slim Jim® branded products were $7
million and $13 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $9 million
and $26 million for the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, reflecting the impact of
the disruption of production due to the accident.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $160
million, an increase of $2 million, or 1%, from the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross profits
in the Commercial Foods segment were $10 million higher for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 than
for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Operating profits at our specialty potato products business
improved, reflecting the impacts of higher selling prices necessitated by increased input costs, as
well as plant efficiencies and a refinement to the specialty potato product costing process. The
refinement in our product costing process resulted in an $11 million increase in operating profit
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and will
result in an approximately equal and offsetting impact in the second half of fiscal 2010, primarily
in the fourth quarter. This was partially offset by the negative impact on sales and volume of
difficult food service industry conditions. Flour milling profitability increased due to mill
efficiencies and favorable wheat market conditions. Profits for the rest of the segment were below
year-ago amounts, reflecting continued difficult market conditions for vegetables, seasonings, and
flavorings in the foodservice channel.
For the first half of fiscal 2010, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $301
million, an increase of $10 million, or 3%, largely driven by improved margins in the flour milling
business. Improved gross profits in the flour milling and specialty potato products businesses
were partially offset by reduced gross profits in the specialty vegetables and flavorings business.
Commercial Foods operating profit in the first half of fiscal 2009 included a gain of $5 million
from the sale of a production facility.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense was $41 million and $43 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
2009, respectively. Net interest expense was $82 million and $93 million for the first half of
fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease of interest expense for the first half of fiscal
2010, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009, reflected $40 million and $33 million of
interest income in the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, principally from the
payment-in-kind notes received in connection with the disposition of the trading and merchandising
business on June 23, 2008.
Income Taxes
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, our income tax expense was $117 million and $85
million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to
pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was
approximately 33% for the second quarters of fiscal 2010 and 2009. In the first half of fiscal
2010 and 2009, our income tax expense was $208 million and $151 million, respectively. The
effective tax rate was approximately 34% and 35% for the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The lower effective tax rates for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010
reflected the benefit of certain income tax credits and deductions identified in the current period
that related to prior periods. Income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of fiscal
2009 reflected the benefit of changes in tax laws, the impacts of divestitures of international
subsidiaries, and changes in estimates.
30
Equity Method Investment Earnings
Equity method investment earnings were $6 million and $15 million for the second quarter and first
half of fiscal 2010, respectively, while equity method investment earnings were $2 million and $3
million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, respectively. Increased equity
method investment earnings were the result of more profitable operations of potato processing
ventures.
Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated an after-tax loss of $4 million and $5 million in the second
quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, and an after-tax loss of $4 million and
after-tax earnings of $331 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009,
respectively. Losses in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related
to certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.
In June 2008, we completed the sale of the trading and merchandising operations and recognized an
after-tax gain on the disposition of approximately $299 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2009. The trading and merchandising operations generated after-tax earnings of $36 million during
the first quarter of fiscal 2009, prior to the divestiture.
Earnings Per Share
Our diluted earnings per share in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 were $0.54
(including earnings of $0.55 per diluted share from continuing operations and a loss of $0.01 per
diluted share from discontinued operations) and $0.91 (including earnings of $0.92 per diluted
share from continuing operations and a loss of $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued
operations), respectively. Our diluted earnings per share in the second quarter and first half of
fiscal 2009 were $0.37 (including earnings of $0.38 per diluted share from continuing operations
and a loss of $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations) and $1.32 (including earnings
of $0.61 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.71 per diluted share from discontinued
operations), respectively. See Items Impacting Comparability above as several other significant
items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary financing objective is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us
flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to
finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable,
accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities) and a combination of equity and long-term debt to
finance both our base working capital needs and our noncurrent assets.
Commercial paper borrowings (usually less than 30 days maturity), when applicable, are reflected in
our consolidated balance sheets within notes payable. At November 29, 2009, we had a $1.5 billion
multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions that matures in
December 2011. The multi-year facility has historically been used solely as a back-up facility for
our commercial paper program. As of November 29, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings under
the credit facility. Borrowings under the multi-year facility bear interest at or below prime rate
and may be prepaid without penalty. The multi-year revolving credit facility requires us to repay
borrowings if our consolidated funded debt exceeds 65% of the consolidated capital base, or if
fixed charges coverage, each as defined in the credit agreement, is less than 1.75 to 1.0. As of
November 29, 2009, we were in compliance with the credit agreements financial covenants.
As of November 29, 2009, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A
significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under
the revolving credit facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our
short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by
negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to
commercial paper more difficult.
We have repurchased our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market
conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. We
completed an accelerated share repurchase program during fiscal 2009. We paid $900 million and
received 38.4 million shares in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 when the program was initiated.
We received an additional 5.6 million shares in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 under this
program. At November 29, 2009, our current share repurchase authorization was essentially
exhausted.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we sold our trading and merchandising operations for
proceeds of: 1) approximately $2.2 billion in cash, net of transaction costs, 2) $550 million
(original principal amount) of payment-in-kind debt securities issued by the purchaser which was
recorded at an initial estimated fair value of $479 million (the Notes), 3) a short-term
receivable of $37 million
31
due from the purchaser (which was subsequently collected in December
2008), and 4) a four-year warrant to acquire approximately 5% of the issued common equity of the
parent company of the divested operations, which has been recorded at an estimated fair value of
$1.8 million. The Notes, which are classified as other assets, had a carrying value of $562 million
at November 29, 2009.
On September 25, 2009, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly dividend to
$0.20 per share from the previous level of $0.19 per share.
Cash Flows
During the first half of fiscal 2010, we generated $247 million of cash, which included $657
million generated from operating activities, $226 million used in investing activities, and $189
million used in financing activities.
Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled approximately $654
million in the first half of fiscal 2010, as compared to $114 million generated in the first half
of fiscal 2009, reflecting increased income from continuing operations in the first half of fiscal
2010 and successful execution of our working capital management initiatives. Improvement in our
accounts receivable and inventory balances reflect the impact of our working capital initiatives as
well as lower commodity costs in our flour milling business. The year-over-year improvement in
operating cash flows also reflects lower incentive payments made in fiscal 2010, earned in fiscal
2009, than those made in fiscal 2009. Cash generated from operating activities of discontinued
operations was approximately $4 million in the first half of fiscal 2010, as compared to cash used
in operating activities of $730 million in the first half of fiscal 2009, as we used a significant
amount of cash to fund working capital needs in the trading and merchandising business immediately
prior to its divestiture.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations totaled $232 million in the first half
of fiscal 2010, versus cash used in investing activities of $252 million in the first half of
fiscal 2009. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2010
consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $242 million, including capital expenditures of $27
million of investments in productive assets related to the recovery of the Slim Jim®
operations. Insurance proceeds of $11 million relating to the Garner accident are included in
investing activities of the first half of fiscal 2010. Investing activities of continuing
operations in the first half of fiscal 2009 consisted of capital expenditures of $221 million and
investments of $76 million for the purchase of businesses and intangible assets, partially offset
by $30 million from the sale of a business. We generated $2.25 billion of cash from investing
activities of discontinued operations in the first half of fiscal 2009 from the disposition of the
trading and merchandising business.
Cash used in financing activities totaled $189 million and $1.4 billion in the first half of fiscal
2010 and 2009, respectively. During the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, we paid dividends of
$169 million and $178 million, respectively. In the first half of fiscal 2009, we repurchased $900
million of our common stock as part of our share repurchase program. During the first half of
fiscal 2009, we decreased our debt by approximately $343 million, reflecting repayment of
commercial paper balances and long-term debt, largely with proceeds from the disposition of the
trading and merchandising business.
We estimate our capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 will be approximately $600 million. This
amount reflects an estimated $90 million of capital expenditures for the construction of a sweet
potato processing facility in Delhi, Louisiana, as well as approximately $35 million of expected
capital expenditures related to the recovery of the Slim Jim® operations.
With respect to the sweet potato facility, we have secured approximately $34 million of cash
incentives in working with Louisiana authorities and continue to work towards securing additional
benefits relating to federal tax incentives for this project. We also expect significant insurance
recoveries related to the Garner accident and have received in excess of $53 million from insurance
carriers as of the date of issuance of this report.
Management believes our sources of cash, including existing cash balances, cash flows from
operations (including insurance recoveries), existing credit facilities, and access to capital
markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs, planned capital
expenditures, payment of anticipated quarterly dividends, and payment of current maturities of
long-term debt.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., operating leases) where the economics and sound
business principles warrant their use. We periodically enter into guarantees and other similar
arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described
further in Obligations and Commitments, below.
In September 2008, we formed a potato processing venture, Lamb Weston BSW, with Ochoa Ag Unlimited
Foods, Inc. We provide all sales and marketing services to the venture. We have determined that
Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity and that we
32
are the primary beneficiary of the
entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. We also
consolidate the assets and liabilities of several entities from which we lease corporate aircraft.
Each of these entities has been determined to be a variable interest entity and we have been
determined to be the primary beneficiary of each of these entities.
Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected in our balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 23, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
114.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
140.1 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
157.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Accrued payroll |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments |
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities (noncontrolling interest) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
116.6 |
|
|
$ |
121.9 |
|
|
$ |
124.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent
additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of these entities have claims only on the
assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit.
Obligations and Commitments
As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future
payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase
obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of
goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as take-or-pay contracts). The unconditional
purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to
ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt and capital lease
obligations, which totaled $3.6 billion as of November 29, 2009, were recognized as liabilities in
our consolidated balance sheet. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations,
which totaled $887 million as of November 29, 2009, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, were not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.
A summary of our contractual obligations as of November 29, 2009 was as follows (including
obligations of discontinued operations):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,533.7 |
|
|
$ |
255.4 |
|
|
$ |
395.9 |
|
|
$ |
585.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,297.2 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
337.7 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
548.9 |
|
|
|
493.4 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,484.0 |
|
|
$ |
815.5 |
|
|
$ |
549.5 |
|
|
$ |
663.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,455.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease
obligations. The weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of
November 29, 2009 was approximately 7.0%.
33
We consolidate the assets and liabilities of certain entities that have been determined to be
variable interest entities and for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary of
these entities. The amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt, in the table
above, include $86 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of
such entities. The long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not
represent additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of these entities have claims only
on the assets of the specific variable interest entities.
The purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $584 million of open
purchase orders, some of which are not legally binding. These purchase orders are settleable in the
ordinary course of business in less than one year.
As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future
cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease
payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized
as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. A summary of our commitments, including
commitments associated with equity method investments, as of November 29, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
Other Commercial Commitments |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Guarantees |
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
Other commitments |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We
guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the 2002 divestiture of
our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed six
years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was approximately $17 million as
of November 29, 2009. We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested business with respect
to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the fresh beef and pork business to
purchase a minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates
minimum price commitments, based in part on market prices and, in certain circumstances, also
includes price adjustments based on certain inputs.
We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply
agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under
certain conditions. At November 29, 2009, the amount of supplier loans effectively guaranteed by us
was approximately $16 million, included in the table above. We have not established a liability for
these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the
guarantees is remote.
We are a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed repayment
of a loan of this supplier, under certain conditions. At November 29, 2009, the amount of this loan
was $25 million, included in the table above. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier,
we have the contractual right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us the rights to
underlying collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we
believe the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this agreement is remote.
The obligations and commitments tables, above, do not include any reserves for income taxes, as we
are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for
income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at November 29, 2009 was $80
million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at November 29, 2009, that, if recognized,
would impact our effective tax rate was $52 million. Recognition of this tax benefit would have a
favorable impact on our effective tax rate.
Critical Accounting Estimates
A discussion of our critical accounting estimates can be found in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to
determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could
34
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The provisions of
guidance are effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2011. Earlier application is prohibited.
We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.
Related Party Transactions
From time to time, we have used the services of a firm whose chief executive officer serves on our
Board of Directors. Payments to this firm for environmental and agricultural engineering services
performed and structures acquired totaled $0.1 million and $0.3 million in the second quarter and
first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, and $0.2 million for
both the second quarter
and first half of fiscal 2009, respectively.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal market risks affecting us are exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy
inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies.
Other than the changes noted below, there have been no material changes in our market risk during
the twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009. For additional information, refer to the
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in Item 7A of our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.
Commodity Market Risk
We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy
products, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations.
These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into
commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative
instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These
policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the
amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.
The following table presents one measure of market risk exposure using sensitivity analysis.
Sensitivity analysis is the measurement of potential loss of fair value of a derivative instrument
resulting from a hypothetical change of 10% in market prices. Actual changes in market prices may
differ from hypothetical changes. In practice, as markets move, we actively manage our risk and
adjust hedging strategies as appropriate.
Fair value was determined using quoted market prices and was based on our net derivative position
by commodity.
The market risk exposure analysis excludes the underlying commodity positions that are being
hedged. The values of commodities hedged have a high inverse correlation to price changes of the
derivative commodity instrument.
Based on our net derivative positions at the end of the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010,
the maximum potential loss of fair value resulting from a hypothetical change of 10% in market
prices was as follows:
Processing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
Grains/Foods |
|
$ |
9 |
|
Energy |
|
|
6 |
|
Packaging and meats |
|
|
1 |
|
Foreign Currency Risk
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter
into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically
hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of
finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.
One measure of market risk exposure can be determined using sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity
analysis is the measurement of potential loss of fair value resulting from a hypothetical change of
10% in exchange rates. Actual changes in exchange rates may differ from hypothetical changes. This
sensitivity analysis excludes the underlying foreign denominated transactions that are being
hedged, which have a high inverse correlation to price changes of the derivative hedging
instrument.
35
Based on our net foreign currency derivative positions at the end of the first and second quarters
of fiscal 2010, the maximum potential loss of fair value resulting from a hypothetical change of
10% in exchange rates was $15 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of November 29, 2009. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
36
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part II - Financial Information
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business,
including lawsuits and claims related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products and
litigation we initiated against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and
defense costs. We recognized a charge of $25.3 million during the second half of fiscal 2009 in
connection with the disputed coverage with this insurance carrier. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, a Delaware state court rendered a decision on certain matters in our claim for the
disputed coverage favorable to the insurance carrier. We intend to appeal this decision and
continue to pursue this matter vigorously.
After taking into account liabilities recorded for these matters, we believe the ultimate
resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations, or liquidity.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the second
quarter of fiscal 2010, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased
as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
may yet be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
under the Programs (1) |
|
August 31 through September 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,000 |
|
September 28 through October 25, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,000 |
|
October 26 through November 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2010 Second Quarter Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs from December 2003, we have
repurchased approximately 106.5 million shares at a cost of $2.5 billion through November 29,
2009. The current program has no expiration date. |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Disclosure pursuant to this item relating to the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on
September 25, 2009 was provided in Item 4 of Part II of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended August 30, 2009, which item is incorporated herein by reference.
37
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
All exhibits as set forth on the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
|
|
|
|
John F. Gehring |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ PATRICK D. LINEHAN |
|
|
|
Patrick D. Linehan |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller |
|
|
Dated this 5th day of January, 2010.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods current report on Form 8-K dated
September 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
ConAgra Foods Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods
current report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the ConAgra Foods 2009
Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
ConAgra Foods quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
August 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock
Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ConAgra
Foods quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August
30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the
ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of ConAgra Foods quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended August 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for certain named executive officers
under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ConAgra Foods quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7* |
|
Summary of Non-employee Director Compensation Program |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certificates |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
The following materials from ConAgra Foods Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 29, 2009, formatted in XBRL
(eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text, and (vi) document and entity information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
40