e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-20278
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
75-2274963
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1329 Millwood Road |
|
|
McKinney, Texas
|
|
75069 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (972) 562-9473
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
o Yes þ No
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period than the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes þ No
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by
reference to the price at which the Common Stock was last sold as of the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $214,767,400 (Note: The aggregate
market value of Common Stock held by the Companys directors, executive officers, immediate family
members of such directors and executive officers and 10% or greater stockholders was excluded from
the computation of the foregoing amount. The characterization of such persons as affiliates
should not be construed as an admission that any such person is an affiliate of the Registrant for
any other purpose).
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 5, 2010: 23,159,052
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Listed below are documents, parts of which are incorporated herein by reference, and the part of
this report into which the document is incorporated:
(1) Proxy statement for the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders Part III
PART I
Item 1. Business.
General
Encore Wire Corporation is a Delaware corporation, incorporated in 1989, with its principal
executive office and manufacturing plants located at 1329 Millwood Road, McKinney, Texas 75069. The
Companys telephone number is (972) 562-9473. As used in this annual report, unless otherwise
required by the context, the terms Company, Encore and Encore Wire refer to Encore Wire Corporation and its
consolidated entities.
Encore is a low-cost manufacturer of copper electrical building wire and cable. The Company is a
significant supplier of building wire for interior electrical wiring in homes, apartments,
manufactured housing, and in commercial and industrial buildings.
The principal customers for Encores wire are wholesale electrical distributors, who sell electric
building wire and a variety of other products to electrical contractors. The Company sells its
products primarily through independent manufacturers representatives located throughout the United
States and, to a lesser extent, through its own direct in-house marketing efforts.
Encores strategy is to further expand its share of the markets for building wire primarily by
emphasizing a high level of customer service and low-cost production and the addition of new
products that complement its current product line. The Company maintains product inventory levels
sufficient to meet anticipated customer demand and believes that the speed and completeness with
which it fills customer orders are key competitive advantages critical to marketing its products.
Encores low-cost production capability features an efficient plant design incorporating highly
automated manufacturing equipment, an integrated production process and an incentivized work force.
Strategy
Encores strategy for expanding its share of the building wire markets emphasizes customer service
and product innovations coupled with low-cost production.
Customer Service. Responsiveness to customers is a primary focus of Encore, with an emphasis on
building and maintaining strong customer relationships. Encore seeks to establish customer loyalty
by achieving a high order fill rate and rapidly handling customer orders, shipments, inquiries and
returns. The Company maintains product inventories sufficient to meet anticipated customer demand
and believes that the speed and completeness with which it fills orders are key competitive
advantages critical to marketing its products.
Product Innovation. Encore has been a leader in bringing new ideas to a commodity product. Encore
pioneered the widespread use of color feeder sizes of commercial wire and colors in the residential
non-metallic wires. The colors have improved on the job safety and reduced installation times for
contractors. Encore Wires new patent pending SmartColor ID system is the industrys smartest and
easiest color-coded MC and AC cable identification system.
Low-Cost Production. Encores low-cost production capability features an efficient plant design
and an incentivized work force.
Efficient Plant Design. Encores highly automated wire manufacturing equipment is integrated in an
efficient design that reduces material handling, labor and in-process inventory.
Incentivized Work Force. Encores hourly manufacturing employees are eligible to receive
incentive pay tied to productivity and quality standards. The Company believes that this
compensation program enables the plants manufacturing lines to attain high output and motivates
manufacturing employees to continually maintain product quality. The Company also believes that
its prior stock option plans enhanced the motivation of its salaried manufacturing supervisors.
The Company has coupled these incentives with a comprehensive safety program that emphasizes
employee participation. The Company provides a 401(k) retirement savings plan to all employees
with at least one year of service.
Products
Encore offers an electric building wire product line that consists primarily of NM-B cable, UF-B
cable, THWN-2 and other types of wire products, including armored cable. The Companys NM-B, UF-B,
THWN-2 and armored cable are all manufactured with copper as the conductor. The Company also
purchases small quantities of other types of wire to re-sell to customers that buy products that
the Company manufactures. The Company maintains approximately
1
9,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) of building wire. The principal bases for differentiation among
SKUs are product diameter, insulation, color and packaging.
NM-B Cable. Non-metallic sheathed cable is used primarily as interior wiring in homes, apartments
and manufactured housing. NM-B cable is composed of either two or three insulated copper wire
conductors, with or without an un-insulated ground wire, all sheathed in a polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) jacket.
UF-B Cable. Underground feeder cable is used to conduct power underground to outside lighting and
other applications remote from buildings. UF-B cable is composed of two or three PVC insulated
copper wire conductors, with or without an un-insulated ground wire, all jacketed in PVC.
THWN-2 Cable. THWN-2 cable is used primarily as feeder, circuit and branch wiring in commercial and
industrial buildings. It is composed of a single conductor, either stranded or solid, and
insulated with PVC, which is further coated with nylon. Users typically pull THWN-2 cable through
protective pipe or conduit.
XHHW-2 Cable XHHW-2 wire is intended for general purpose applications utilized in conduit or other
recognized raceways for service, feeders, and branch-circuit wiring. Its composed of a single
conductor, either stranded or solid and with a single layer of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE)
insulation.
USE-2 Cable. USE-2 or RHH or RHW-2 wire is intended for general purpose applications utilized in
conduit or installed in underground applications or in recognized raceways for service, feeders,
and branch-circuit wiring. Its composed of a single conductor, either stranded or solid and with a
single layer of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation suitable for wet locations.
Armored Cable. Armored cable is used primarily as feeder, circuit and branch wiring, primarily in
commercial and industrial buildings. It is composed of multiple conductors, either stranded or
solid, and insulated with PVC, which are further coated with nylon and then fully encased in a
flexible aluminum or steel armored protective sheath that eliminates the need to pull the wire
through pipe or conduit.
Photovoltaic Cable. Photovoltaic style cables are designed to meet the different needs of the
emerging Solar Industry by providing connections between PV panels, collector boxes and inverters;
and where also allowed by the National Electric Code (NEC).
Manufacturing
The efficiency of Encores highly automated manufacturing facility is a key element of its low-cost
production capability. Encores residential wire manufacturing lines have been integrated so that
the handling of product is substantially reduced throughout the production process.
The manufacturing process for the Companys various products involves multiple steps, including:
casting, drawing, stranding, compounding, insulating, jacketing and armoring.
Casting. Rod is produced by melting sheets of copper cathode and copper scrap, casting the molten
copper into a bar and rolling the hot copper bar into a 5/16 inch copper rod to be drawn into
copper wire.
Drawing. Drawing is the process of reducing 5/16 inch copper rod through converging dies until the
specified wire diameter is attained. The wire is then heated with electrical current to soften or
anneal the wire to make it easier to handle.
Stranding. Stranding is the process of twisting together from seven to sixty-one individual wire
strands to form a single cable. The purpose of stranding is to improve the flexibility of wire
while maintaining its electrical current carrying capacity.
PVC Compounding. PVC compounding is the process of mixing the various raw materials that are
required to produce the PVC necessary to meet U/L specifications for the insulation and jacket
requirements for the wire that is manufactured.
Insulating. Insulating is the process of extruding first PVC and then nylon (where applicable)
over the solid or stranded wire.
Jacketing. Jacketing is the process of extruding PVC over two or more insulated conductor wires,
with or without an un-insulated ground wire, to form a finished product. The Companys jacketing
lines are integrated with packaging lines that cut the wire and coil it onto reels or package it in
boxes or shrink-wrap.
2
Armoring. Armoring is the process of covering two or more insulated conductor wires, with or
without an un-insulated ground wire, with a spiral interlocking cover of aluminum or steel to form
a finished product.
Encore manufactures and tests all of its products in accordance with the standards of Underwriters
Laboratories, Inc. (U/L), a nationally recognized testing and standards agency. Encores machine
operators and quality control inspectors conduct routine product tests. The Company tests finished
products for electrical continuity to ensure compliance with its own quality standards and those of
U/L. Encores manufacturing lines are equipped with laser micrometers to measure wire diameter and
insulation thickness while the lines are in operation. During each shift, operators perform and
record routine physical measurements of products, all of which are separately verified and approved
by quality control inspectors. Although suppliers pretest PVC and nylon compounds, the Company
tests products for aging, cracking and brittleness of insulation and jacketing.
Customers
Encore sells its wire principally to wholesale electrical distributors throughout the United States
and, to a lesser extent, to retail home improvement centers. Most distributors supply products to
electrical contractors. No customer accounted for more than ten percent of net sales in 2009.
Encore believes that the speed and completeness with which it fills customers orders is crucial to
its ability to expand the market share for its products. The Company also believes that, in order
to reduce costs, many customers do not maintain substantial inventories. Because of this trend,
the Company seeks to maintain sufficient inventories to satisfy customers prompt delivery
requirements.
Marketing and Distribution
Encore markets its products throughout the United States primarily through independent
manufacturers representatives and, to a lesser extent, through its own direct marketing efforts.
Encore maintains the majority of its finished product inventory at its plant in McKinney, Texas.
In order to provide flexibility in handling customer requests for immediate delivery of the
Companys products, additional product inventories are maintained at warehouses owned and operated
by independent manufacturers representatives located throughout the United States. As of December
31, 2009, additional product inventories are maintained at the warehouses of independent
manufacturers representatives located in Chattanooga, Tennessee; Norcross, Georgia; Cincinnati,
Ohio; Detroit, Michigan; Edison, New Jersey; Louisville, Kentucky; Greensboro, North Carolina;
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Santa Fe Springs, California; and Hayward, California. Some of these
manufacturers representatives, as well as the Companys other manufacturers representatives,
maintain offices without warehouses in numerous locations throughout the United States.
Finished goods are typically delivered to warehouses and customers by trucks operated by common
carriers. The decision regarding the carrier to be used is based primarily on cost and
availability.
The Company invoices its customers directly for products purchased and, if an order has been
obtained through a manufacturers representative, pays the representative a commission based on
pre-established rates. The Company determines customer credit limits. The Companys bad debt
experience in 2009, 2008, and 2007 was 0.00%, 0.13%, and 0.003% of net sales, respectively. The
manufacturers representatives have no discretion to increase customer credit limits or to
determine prices charged for the Companys products, and all sales are subject to approval by the
Company. Encore sells all of its products with a one-year replacement warranty. Warranty expenses
have historically been nominal.
Employees
Encore believes that its hourly employees are highly motivated and that their motivation
contributes significantly to the plants efficient operation. The Company attributes the
motivation of these employees largely to the fact that a significant portion of their compensation
comes from incentive pay that is tied to productivity and quality standards. The Company believes
that its incentive program focuses its employees on maintaining product quality.
As of December 31, 2009, Encore had 669 employees, 555 of whom were paid hourly wages and were
primarily engaged in the operation and maintenance of the Companys manufacturing and warehouse
facility. The rest of the Companys employees were executive, supervisory, administrative, sales
and clerical personnel. The Company considers its relations with its employees to be good. The
Company has no collective bargaining agreements with any of its employees.
3
Raw Materials
The principal raw materials used by Encore in manufacturing its products are copper cathode, copper
scrap, PVC thermoplastic compounds, aluminum, steel, paper and nylon, all of which are readily
available from a number of suppliers. Copper is the principal raw material used by the Company in
manufacturing its products, constituting nearly 90% of the dollar value of all raw materials used
by the Company during 2009. Copper requirements are purchased primarily from miners and commodity
brokers at prices determined each month primarily based on the average daily COMEX closing prices
for copper for that month, plus a negotiated premium. The Company also purchases raw materials
necessary to manufacture various PVC thermoplastic compounds. These raw materials include PVC
resin, clay and plasticizer.
The Company produces copper rod from purchased copper cathodes and copper scrap in its own rod
fabrication facility. The Company reprocesses copper scrap generated by its operations and copper
scrap purchased from others. In 2009, the Companys copper rod fabrication facility manufactured
the majority of the Companys copper rod requirements.
The Company also compounds its own wire jacket and insulation compounds. The process involves the
mixture of PVC raw material components to produce the PVC used to insulate the Companys wire and
cable products. The raw materials include PVC resin, clay and plasticizer. During the last year,
the Companys plastic compounding facility produced virtually all of the Companys PVC
requirements.
Competition
The electrical wire and cable industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with several
companies who manufacturer and sell wire and cable products beyond the building wire segment in
which the Company competes. The Companys primary competitors include Southwire Company, Cerro
Wire LLC, United Copper Industries and AFC Cable Systems, Inc.
The principal elements of competition in the electrical wire and cable industry are, in the opinion
of the Company, pricing, order fill rate, quality, and, in some instances, breadth of product line.
The Company believes that it is competitive with respect to all of these factors.
Competition in the electrical wire and cable industry, although intense, has been primarily from
U.S. manufacturers, including foreign owned facilities located in the United States. The Company
has encountered little significant competition from imports of building wire. The Company believes
this is primarily because direct labor costs generally account for a relatively small percentage of
the cost of goods sold for these products.
Intellectual Property Matters
The Company owns the following federally registered trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office: U.S. Registration Number 2,687,746 for the ENCORE WIRE mark; U.S. Registration Number
2,528,340 for the NONLEDEX mark; U.S. Registration Number 1,900,498 for the Miscellaneous Design
mark; U.S. Registration Number 2,263,692 for the HANDY MANS CHOICE mark; U.S. Registration
Number 3,652,394 for the MCMP MULTIPURPOSE (Stylized) mark; and U.S. Registration Number
3,616,771 for the SUPER SLICK mark. The current terms of trademark protection for these marks
will expire on various dates between 2012 and 2019, but each term can be renewed indefinitely as
long as the respective mark continues to be used in commerce. The Company also owns the following
pending applications: Application Number 77/735,022 for the EMERGMC mark, which was filed on May
12, 2009 and for which a Notice of Allowance was issued on December 15, 2009; Application Number
77/704,999 for the HCF-MCMP MULTIPURPOSE mark, which was filed on April 2, 2009 and for which a
Notice of Allowance was issued on December 22, 2009; Application Number 77/779,397 for the HCF-MP
MULTIPURPOSE mark, which was filed on July 13, 2009 and which was published for opposition on
January 26, 2010; Application Number 77/678,427 for the SMARTCOLOR ID mark, which was filed on
February 25, 2009 and for which a Notice of Allowance was issued on February 9, 2010; Application
Number 77/856,196 for the SUPER SLICK mark, which was filed on October 23, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,135 for the SUPER SUPERSLICK mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,114 for the SUPERBOND MC mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,146 for the SUPERSLICK ELITE mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,134 for the SUPERSLICK II mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009; Application
Number 77/790,370 for the ENCORE PERFORMANCE mark, which was filed on July 27, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,121 for the SUPERBOND MCMP mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009; Application
Number 77/857,126 for the SUPERBOND MCMP MULTIPURPOSE mark, which was filed on October 26, 2009;
Application Number 77/907,735 for the SMARTSLICK TECHNOLOGY mark, which was filed on January 8,
2010; Application Number 77/907,931 for the SUPERSLICK TECHNOLOGY mark, which was filed on
January 8, 2010; Application Number 77/942.361 for the HCF-SG SMARTGROUND mark, which was filed
on February 23, 2010; and Application
4
Number 77/942,353 for the MC-SG SMARTGROUND mark, which was filed on February 23, 2010. These
trademarks provide source identification for the goods manufactured and sold by the Company and
allow the Company to achieve brand recognition within the industry.
Although the Company has filed patent applications with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, it does not currently hold any patented intellectual property.
Internet Address/SEC Filings
The Companys Internet address is http://www.encorewire.com. Under the Investors section of our
website, the Company provides a link to our electronic Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current
reports on Form 8-K, director and officer beneficial ownership reports filed pursuant to Section 16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any amendments to these reports. All such
reports are available free of charge and are available as soon as reasonably practicable after the
Company files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
The public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The following are risk factors that could affect the Companys business, financial results
and results of operations. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating
the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors
could cause the actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in
forward-looking statements. Before purchasing the Companys stock, an investor should know that
making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks described below. If any of the
risks mentioned below or other unknown risks actually occur, the Companys business, financial
condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price
of its stock could fluctuate significantly.
Product Pricing and Volatility of Copper Market
Price competition for copper electrical wire and cable is intense, and the Company sells its
product in accordance with prevailing market prices. Wire prices can, and frequently do change on
a daily basis. This competitive pricing market for wire does not always mirror changes in copper
prices, making margins highly volatile. Copper, a commodity product, is the principal raw material
used in the Companys manufacturing operations. Copper accounted for approximately 73.5% and 90.3%
of its costs of goods sold during 2009 and 2008, respectively, and the Company expects that copper
will continue to account for a significant portion of these costs in the future. The price of
copper fluctuates, depending on general economic conditions and in relation to supply and demand
and other factors, and causes monthly variations in the cost of copper purchased by the Company.
The Company cannot predict copper prices in the future or the effect of fluctuations in the costs
of copper on the Companys future operating results. Consequently, fluctuations in copper prices
caused by market forces can significantly affect the Companys financial results. With the
volatility of both raw material prices and wire prices in the Companys end market, hedging raw
materials can be risky. Historically, the Company has not engaged in hedging strategies for raw
material purchases.
Operating Results May Fluctuate
Encores quarterly results of operations may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors,
including fluctuation in the demand for and shipments of the Companys products. Therefore,
quarter-to-quarter comparisons of results of operations have been and will be impacted by the
volume of such orders and shipments. In addition, its operating results could be adversely
affected by the following factors, among others, such as variations in the mix of product sales,
price changes in response to competitive factors, increases in raw material costs and other
significant costs, the loss of key manufacturers representatives who sell the Companys product
line, increases in utility costs (particularly electricity and natural gas) and various types of
insurance coverage and interruptions in plant operations resulting from the interruption of raw
material supplies and other factors.
Reliance on Senior Management
Encores future operating results depend, in part, upon the continued service of its senior
management, Mr. Daniel L. Jones, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Frank J.
Bilban, the Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (neither of whom are bound by an
employment agreement). The Companys future success will
5
depend upon its continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial and technical
personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the
Company will retain its key managerial and technical employees or that it will be successful in
attracting, assimilating or retaining other highly qualified personnel in the future.
Industry Conditions and Cyclicality
The residential, commercial and industrial construction industries, which are the end users of the
Companys products, are cyclical and are affected by a number of factors including the general
condition of the economy, market demand and changes in interest rates, among other factors.
Industry sales of electrical wire and cable products tend to parallel general construction
activity, which includes remodeling. Housing construction activity in the United States declined
significantly in 2006 and continued its downward trend through 2009, adversely affecting the
Companys business by reducing our customers demand for our products. Commercial and Industrial
construction activity began declining at the beginning of 2008 and continued to decrease through
2009, further reducing demand for our products. Unit volume, as measured in pounds of copper wire
sold, declined 12% in 2008 versus 2007 and declined another 15.6% in 2009 versus 2008. The company
believes that the volume of product sold declined primarily as a result of the slowdown in
construction throughout the United States. The ongoing recession will likely have a negative
impact on the housing and commercial building markets for the foreseeable future.
Deterioration in the financial condition of the Companys customers due to current industry and
economic conditions may result in reduced sales, an inability to collect receivables and payment
delays or losses due to a customers bankruptcy or insolvency. Although the Companys bad debt
experience has been relatively low even in recent years and no one customer represents more than
10% of net sales, the Companys inability to collect receivables may increase the amounts the
Company must expense against its bad debt reserve, decreasing the Companys profitability. In
2008, the Company wrote off $1.4 million in receivables which were uncollectible, almost entirely
due to one customer. The downturn in the residential, commercial or industrial construction
industries and general economic conditions as a whole may continue to have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
Environmental Liabilities
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental protection laws and regulations
governing the Companys operations and the use, handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous
substances currently or formerly used by the Company. A risk of environmental liability is
inherent in the Companys current manufacturing activities in the event of a release or discharge
of a hazardous substance generated by the Company. Under certain environmental laws, the Company
could be held jointly and severally responsible for the remediation of any hazardous substance
contamination at the Companys facilities and at third party waste disposal sites and could also be
held liable for any consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other
environmental damage. There can be no assurance that the costs of complying with environmental,
health and safety laws and requirements in the Companys current operations or the liabilities
arising from past releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances, will not result in future
expenditures by the Company that could materially and adversely affect the Companys financial
results, cash flow or financial condition.
Competition
The electrical wire and cable industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with several
manufacturers of wire and cable products that have substantially greater resources than the
Company. Some of these competitors are owned and operated by large, diversified companies. The
principal elements of competition in the wire and cable industry are, in the opinion of the
Company, pricing, product availability and quality and, in some instances, breadth of product line.
The Company believes that it is competitive with respect to all of these factors. While the
number of firms producing wire and cable has declined in the past, there can be no assurance that
new competitors will not emerge or that existing producers will not employ or improve upon the
Companys manufacturing and marketing strategy.
Patent and Intellectual Property Disputes
Disagreements about patents and intellectual property rights occur in the wire and cable industry.
The unfavorable resolution of a patent or intellectual property dispute could preclude the Company
from manufacturing and selling certain products or could require the Company to pay a royalty on
the sale of certain products. Patent and intellectual property disputes could also result in
substantial legal fees and other costs.
6
Common Stock Price May Fluctuate
Future announcements concerning Encore or its competitors or customers, quarterly variations in
operating results, announcements of technological innovations, the introduction of new products or
changes in product pricing policies by the Company or its competitors, developments regarding
proprietary rights, changes in earnings estimates by analysts or reports regarding the Company or
its industry in the financial press or investment advisory publications, among other factors, could
cause the market price of the Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. These fluctuations, as well
as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, world events, military
conflicts or market or market-sector declines, may materially and adversely affect the market price
of the Common Stock.
Beneficial Ownership of the Companys Common Stock by a Small Number of Stockholders
A small number of significant stockholders beneficially own greater than 50% of the outstanding
common stock of the Company. These stockholders, acting together, could be able to control the
election of directors and all matters requiring majority approval by the Companys stockholders.
The interests of this group of stockholders may not always coincide with the Companys interests or
the interests of other stockholders.
In the future, these stockholders could sell large amounts of common stock over relatively short
periods of time. Sales of substantial amounts of the Companys common stock in the public market
by existing stockholders or the perception that these sales could occur, may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock by creating a public perception of difficulties or problems with
the Companys business.
Future Sales of Common Stock Could Affect the Price of the Common Stock
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of shares or the availability
of shares for sale will have on the market price of the Common Stock prevailing from time to time.
Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock, or the perception that such sales might occur, could
adversely affect prevailing market prices of the Common Stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None
Item 2. Properties.
Encore maintains its corporate office and manufacturing plant in McKinney, Texas, approximately 35
miles north of Dallas. The Companys facilities are located on a combined site of approximately
125 acres and consist of buildings containing approximately 1,396,000 square feet of floor space,
of which approximately 81,000 square feet is used for office space and 1,315,000 square feet is
used for manufacturing and warehouse operations. The plant and equipment are owned by the Company
and are not mortgaged to secure any of the Companys existing indebtedness. Encore believes that
its plant and equipment are suited to its present needs, comply with applicable federal, state and
local laws and regulations, are properly maintained and adequately insured.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
On July 7, 2009, Southwire Company, a Delaware corporation (Southwire), filed a
complaint for patent infringement against the Company and Cerro Wire, Inc. in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In the
complaint, Southwire alleges that the Company has infringed one or more claims of
United States Patent No. 7,557,301, entitled Method of Manufacturing Electrical Cable
Having Reduced Required Force for Installation, by making and selling electrical cables,
including the Companys Super Slick cables. On February 5, 2010, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (the USPTO) ordered the re-examination of the U.S. Patent 7,557,301.
In ordering re-examination of Southwires 301 patent, the USPTO has determined that the
Companys submission of prior art not previously considered during the original
examination of the 301 patent has raised a substantial new question of
patentability of the claims of the 301 patent. In the re-examination,
an Examiner in the USPTO will review the claims of the Southwire 301
patent and make a new determination of the patentability of those claims.
On August 24, 2009, Southwire filed a second complaint for
patent and trademark infringement against the Company.
In the second complaint, Southwire has alleged that the
Company infringed one or more of the claims of United States Patent No. 6,486,395
entitled Interlocked Metal Clad Cable by making and selling electrical cables,
including the Companys MCMP Multipurpose cables. Southwire has also alleged that the
Company has infringed Southwires United States Trademark registration for the mark, MCAP,
Registration No. 3,292,777. The second complaint also alleges violations of Federal, State and
Common law unfair competition claims. The Company has filed counterclaims against Southwire
alleging claims of statutory and common law unfair competition violations, tortious interference
with existing and prospective business relations, misappropriation and claims for declaratory relief.
The complaints seek unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The Company disputes
all of Southwires claims and alleged damages and intends to vigorously defend the
lawsuits and vigorously pursue its own claims.
The Company is also a party to litigation and claims arising out of the ordinary business of the Company.
7
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Information regarding Encores executive officers including their respective ages as of March 5,
2010, is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position with Company |
Daniel L. Jones
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Member of
the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank J. Bilban
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Vice President Finance, Treasurer, Secretary,
and Chief Financial Officer |
Mr. Jones has held the title of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February
2006. He performed the duties of the Chief Executive Officer in an interim capacity from May 2005
to February 2006. From May 1998 until February 2006, Mr. Jones was President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company. He previously held the positions of Chief Operating Officer from October
1997 until May 1998, Executive Vice President from May 1997 to October 1997, Vice President-Sales
and Marketing from 1992 to May 1997, after serving as Director of Sales since joining the Company
in November 1989. He has also served as a member of the Board of Directors since May 1994.
Mr. Bilban has served as Vice President-Finance, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
of Encore since June 2000. From 1998 until joining the Company in June 2000, Mr. Bilban was
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alpha Holdings, Inc., a plastics
manufacturing conglomerate. From 1996 until 1998, Mr. Bilban was Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Wedge Dia-Log Inc., an oil field services company.
All executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors to serve until the next
annual meeting of the Board or until their respective successors are chosen and qualified.
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities. |
The Companys Common Stock is traded and quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Markets Global Select Market
under the symbol WIRE. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices per
share for the Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
22.88 |
|
|
$ |
15.83 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
23.77 |
|
|
|
19.47 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
24.28 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
23.24 |
|
|
|
19.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
|
$ |
15.45 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
24.71 |
|
|
|
18.05 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
22.72 |
|
|
|
17.63 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
19.51 |
|
|
|
13.56 |
|
As of March 4, 2010, there were 54 record holders of the Companys Common Stock.
The Company paid its first cash dividend in January 2007 and has continued paying quarterly
dividends of two cents per share through 2009. Aside from periodic dividends, management intends
to retain the majority of future earnings for the operation and expansion of the Companys
business.
8
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the
Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of
the Company. The Companys Board of Directors has subsequently authorized annual extensions of
this stock repurchase program through February 28, 2011 authorizing the Company to repurchase up to
the remaining 610,000 shares of its common stock. On February 15, 2010, the Board of directors
added an additional 2 million shares to this authorization, authorizing the Company to purchase up
to 2,610,000 of its shares through February 28, 2011. The Company repurchased zero shares of its
stock in 2009 and 265,600 shares of its stock in 2008.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about the Companys equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
be issued upon |
|
Weighted-average |
|
equity compensation |
|
|
exercise of outstanding |
|
exercise price of |
|
plans (excluding |
|
|
options, warrants and |
|
outstanding options, |
|
securities reflected in |
|
|
rights |
|
warrants and rights |
|
column (a)) |
PLAN CATEGORY |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
483,926 |
|
|
$ |
14.09 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
483,926 |
|
|
$ |
14.09 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Performance Graph
The following graph is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, respectively.
The graph below sets forth the cumulative total stockholder return, which assumes reinvestment
of dividends, of a $100 investment in the Companys Common Stock, the Companys self-determined
peer group for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Old Peer Group), the Companys
self-determined peer group for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the New Peer Group), the
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) Index and the Russell 2000 Index.
The Old Peer Group consists of General Cable Corporation, Belden Inc. and Superior Essex Inc.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company changed the Old Peer Group by replacing
Superior Essex Inc. with Coleman Cable, Inc. to form the New Peer Group. The Company changed
its peer group, because LS Cable Ltd., a privately held company, acquired Superior Essex Inc. in
August 2008, and Superior Essex Inc. was removed from listing on NASDAQ. The Company believes
that Coleman Cable, Inc., one of the Companys peers in the wire and cable industry, is an
appropriate company to substitute for Superior Essex Inc. The Company believes that although
the companies included in the Old Peer Group and the New Peer Group engage in activities beyond
the Companys building wire line of business, they reasonably reflect the Companys peers in the
wire and cable industry.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company also changed the broad equity market index
with which it compares the Companys cumulative total return from the NASDAQ Stock Market (US
Companies) to the Russell 2000 Index. The Company changed the broad equity market index,
because the Company believes that, in light of the Companys market capitalization, the Russell
2000 Index is a more comparable index with which to compare the Company.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encore Wire Corporation |
|
Return % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.75 |
|
|
|
-3.30 |
|
|
|
-27.44 |
|
|
|
19.73 |
|
|
|
11.43 |
|
|
|
Cum |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
170.75 |
|
|
|
165.11 |
|
|
|
119.81 |
|
|
|
143.45 |
|
|
|
159.85 |
|
Russell 2000 Index |
|
Return % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
18.35 |
|
|
|
-1.55 |
|
|
|
-33.80 |
|
|
|
27.19 |
|
|
|
Cum |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
104.56 |
|
|
|
123.75 |
|
|
|
121.83 |
|
|
|
80.66 |
|
|
|
102.59 |
|
NASDAQ Stock Market |
|
Return % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
9.84 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
|
|
|
-51.80 |
|
|
|
43.76 |
|
(US Companies) |
|
Cum |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
102.13 |
|
|
|
112.18 |
|
|
|
121.67 |
|
|
|
58.64 |
|
|
|
84.30 |
|
New Peer Group |
|
Return % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.24 |
|
|
|
86.85 |
|
|
|
44.55 |
|
|
|
-67.50 |
|
|
|
33.41 |
|
|
|
Cum |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
125.24 |
|
|
|
234.00 |
|
|
|
338.25 |
|
|
|
109.93 |
|
|
|
146.65 |
|
Old Peer Group |
|
Return % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.24 |
|
|
|
86.85 |
|
|
|
44.55 |
|
|
|
-67.92 |
|
|
|
35.73 |
|
|
|
Cum |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
125.24 |
|
|
|
234.00 |
|
|
|
338.25 |
|
|
|
108.51 |
|
|
|
147.29 |
|
Notes
|
(1) |
|
Data presented in the performance graph is complete through December 31, 2009. |
|
|
(2) |
|
The Old Peer Group is self-determined and consists of the following companies:
General Cable Corporation, Belden Inc. and Superior Essex Inc. |
|
|
(3) |
|
The New Peer Group is self-determined and consists of the following companies:
General Cable Corporation, Belden Inc. and Coleman Cable, Inc. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Each peer group index uses only such peer groups performance and excludes the
performance of the Company. Each peer group index uses beginning of period market
capitalization weighting. |
|
|
(5) |
|
Each data line represents quarterly index levels derived from compounded daily
returns that include all dividends. |
|
|
(6) |
|
The index level for all data lines was set to $100.00 on December 31, 2004. |
10
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data.
The following financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8, Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data. The table below presents, as of and for the dates indicated, selected
historical financial information for the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Statement of Income Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
649,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,081,132 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,786 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,330 |
|
|
$ |
758,089 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
599,498 |
|
|
|
957,767 |
|
|
|
1,073,451 |
|
|
|
1,005,037 |
|
|
|
632,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
50,115 |
|
|
|
123,365 |
|
|
|
111,335 |
|
|
|
244,293 |
|
|
|
125,247 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
43,767 |
|
|
|
61,180 |
|
|
|
60,400 |
|
|
|
59,793 |
|
|
|
46,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,348 |
|
|
|
62,185 |
|
|
|
50,935 |
|
|
|
184,500 |
|
|
|
78,912 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense) |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,181 |
) |
|
|
(4,704 |
) |
|
|
(5,834 |
) |
|
|
(7,686 |
) |
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
59,897 |
|
|
|
46,810 |
|
|
|
176,740 |
|
|
|
74,976 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
20,126 |
|
|
|
16,014 |
|
|
|
61,607 |
|
|
|
24,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,636 |
|
|
$ |
39,771 |
|
|
$ |
30,796 |
|
|
$ |
115,133 |
|
|
$ |
50,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common
equivalent shares basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
4.95 |
|
|
$ |
2.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common
equivalent shares diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares basic |
|
|
23,011 |
|
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
23,254 |
|
|
|
23,117 |
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares diluted |
|
|
23,298 |
|
|
|
23,396 |
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
|
23,674 |
|
|
|
23,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
276,882 |
|
|
$ |
378,033 |
|
|
$ |
346,910 |
|
|
$ |
333,865 |
|
|
$ |
199,113 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
534,558 |
|
|
|
533,339 |
|
|
|
513,912 |
|
|
|
474,157 |
|
|
|
348,476 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,675 |
|
|
|
100,910 |
|
|
|
98,974 |
|
|
|
70,438 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
392,984 |
|
|
|
389,619 |
|
|
|
354,969 |
|
|
|
327,121 |
|
|
|
210,535 |
|
Annual dividends paid |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
11
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
Introduction
The following managements discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of
key factors, drivers and risks regarding the Company and the building wire industry.
Executive Overview
Encore Wire sells a commodity product in a highly competitive market. Management strongly believes
that the historical strength of the Companys growth and earnings is attributable to the following
main factors:
|
|
|
Industry leading order-fill rates and responsive customer service. |
|
|
|
|
Product innovations based on listening to and understanding customer needs. |
|
|
|
|
Low cost manufacturing operations, resulting from a state of the art manufacturing
plant. |
|
|
|
|
A focused management team leading an incentivized work force. |
|
|
|
|
Low general and administrative overhead costs. |
|
|
|
|
A team of experienced independent manufacturers representatives with strong customer
relationships across the United States. |
These factors, and others, have allowed Encore Wire to grow from a startup in 1989 to what
management believes is one of the largest copper electric building wire companies in the United
States of America. Encore has built a loyal following of customers throughout the United States.
These customers have developed a brand preference for Encore Wire in a commodity product line, due
to the reasons noted above, among others. The Company prides itself on striving to grow sales by
expanding its product offerings where profit margins are acceptable. Senior management monitors
gross margins daily, frequently extending down to the individual order level. Management strongly
believes that this focused approach to the building wire business has produced success thus far and
will lead to continued success.
The construction and remodeling industries drive demand for building wire. Housing construction
activity in the United States softened significantly in 2006 and continued its downward trend
through 2009. Nationally, commercial construction had been relatively strong through 2007, but
slowed significantly in 2008 and 2009. According to various industry and national economic
forecasts the future is unclear for the next few years. The credit crisis and the resulting
tightening of credit could negatively impact the availability of capital to fund construction
projects for some time to come. Data on remodeling is not as readily available; however,
remodeling activity tends to trend up when new construction slows down.
General
Price competition for electrical wire and cable is intense, and the Company sells its products in
accordance with prevailing market prices. Copper, a commodity product, is the principal raw
material used by the Company in manufacturing its products. Copper accounted for approximately
73.5%, 90.3% and 86.5% of the Companys cost of goods sold during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The price of copper fluctuates, depending on general economic conditions and in
relation to supply and demand and other factors, which causes monthly variations in the cost of
copper purchased by the Company. In 2007, copper prices began the year at what proved to be a low
point and then moved upward and traded in a fairly wide range during the year with significant
volatility. In 2008, copper prices rose during the first quarter and then held at high levels
through early July, before beginning a precipitous decline through the rest of the year falling
from a COMEX close of $3.92 per pound on July 1st to close at $1.39 per pound on
December 31st. This unprecedented swift decline in copper prices mirrored that of many
other commodities in the second half of 2008. In 2009, copper began at the 2008 year end lows and
rose gradually throughout the year, mirroring the rebound in global commodity prices. The Company
cannot predict copper prices in the future or the effect of fluctuations in the cost of copper on
the Companys future operating results. Wire prices can, and frequently do change on a daily
basis. This competitive pricing market for wire does not always mirror changes in copper prices,
making margins highly volatile. With the volatility of both raw material prices and wire prices in
the Companys end market, hedging raw materials can be risky. Historically, the Company has not
engaged in hedging strategies for raw material purchases.
12
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain items of income and expense as a percentage of net sales for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
Other raw materials |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Labor and overhead |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
LIFO adjustment |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(.6 |
) |
Lower cost or market adjustment |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion and analysis relates to factors that have affected the operating results
of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. Reference should also be made
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included under Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report.
Net sales were $649.6 million in 2009, compared to $1.081 billion in 2008 and $1.185 billion in
2007. The 39.9% decrease in net sales in 2009 versus 2008 was primarily the result of a 28.8%
decrease in the average selling price of product sold and a 15.6% decrease in the volume of copper
pounds of product sold. Unit volume declined in concert with declining industry sales due to the
continued low level of housing construction and the deterioration of commercial construction in the
United States as discussed throughout this report. The average price of copper purchased in 2009
decreased by 29.4%. The decreased average selling prices for wire fell more in dollars per pound
than the cost of copper purchased, decreasing the spread between the sales price of wire and the
price of raw copper, and decreasing margins. Margins were at their highest during the first
quarter and decreased steadily through the rest of the year, as the Companys competitors reacted
to declining industry unit volumes by cutting prices in an effort to maintain market share, despite
Encore Wires repeated attempts to lead industry price increases.
The 9% decrease in net sales in 2008 versus 2007 was primarily the result of a 4% increase in the
average selling price of product sold offset by a 12% decrease in the volume of copper pounds of
product sold affected slightly by a change in the mix of product sold. Unit volume declined in
concert with declining industry sales due to the continued low level of housing construction and
the deterioration of commercial construction in the United States. The average price of copper
purchased, however, decreased by 1%. This decreased cost of copper and increased price of wire
sold expanded the spread between the sales price of wire and the price of raw copper, increasing
margins. Margins were lowest during the second quarter, during which price cutting by the
Companys competitors was at its peak. Margins improved in the second half of the year even though
copper prices declined precipitously. The margins were at their highest in the fourth quarter as
the Company and the industry were able to cut the selling price of wire slower than copper prices
fell, driving spreads and corresponding earnings higher.
Cost of goods sold was $599 million in 2009, compared to $958 million in 2008 and $1.073 billion in
2007. Copper costs were $440.5 million in 2009 compared to $865.2 million in 2008 and $929.0
million in 2007. Copper costs as a percentage of net sales decreased to 67.8% in 2009 from 80.0%
in 2008 and 78.4% in 2007. The decrease as a percentage of net sales was due to copper costs
decreasing more than other costs. Other raw material costs as a percentage of net sales were 8.8%,
6.6% and 6.3%, in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Other raw materials declined 5.6% on a cents
per pound basis during 2009. Percentage increases in all material costs in 2008 were offset by a
4.8% LIFO credit, while in 2009 they were increased by a 5.6% LIFO debit (expense). Taking LIFO
into account along with copper and other materials, the total LIFO adjusted materials cost in
2009 was 82.2% of sales versus 81.8% in 2008.
13
Depreciation, labor and overhead costs as a percentage of net sales were 10.1% in 2009, compared to
6.8% in 2008 and 6.5% in 2007. The percentage increase in 2009 was due primarily to the
precipitous drop in sales dollars exceeding the percentage drop in these other costs despite lower
production volumes in concert with lower unit sales. This disparity is due to the fact that these
other costs have fixed or semi-fixed components and do not vary directly with unit volumes. The
percentage increase in 2008 was due primarily to lower production volumes in concert with lower
unit sales and the relationship of fixed costs in these categories.
Inventories consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
14,497 |
|
|
$ |
16,184 |
|
|
$ |
28,190 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
12,239 |
|
|
|
8,746 |
|
|
|
14,919 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
75,239 |
|
|
|
63,718 |
|
|
|
113,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,975 |
|
|
|
88,648 |
|
|
|
156,865 |
|
Adjust to LIFO cost |
|
|
(59,412 |
) |
|
|
(23,115 |
) |
|
|
(74,852 |
) |
Lower of cost or market adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,563 |
|
|
$ |
65,533 |
|
|
$ |
82,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009, copper began at the 2008 year end lows and rose gradually throughout the year, mirroring
the rebound in global commodity prices. The unit volume of inventory on-hand also decreased in
2009. These factors resulted in the 2009 year-end inventory value of all inventories using the
LIFO method being $59.4 million less than the FIFO value, and the 2009 year end LIFO reserve
balance being $36.3 million higher than at the end of 2008. This resulted in a corresponding
increase of $36.3 million in cost of goods sold for the year. Due to the management of inventory
levels commensurate with declining unit sales volumes during 2009, the Company liquidated a portion
of the inventory layer established in 2005. As a result, under the LIFO method, these inventory
layers were liquidated at historical costs that were less than current costs, which favorably
impacted cost of goods sold by $13.1 million for the full year and net income for the full year by
$9.9 million.
Copper prices began 2008 at a relative low point in the first quarter and then trended upward in
the second quarter, peaking in early July and then dropping dramatically through the second half of
the year in concert with the global collapse of commodity prices. The 2008 year-end price of
copper was significantly below the 2007 year-end price. The unit volume of inventory on-hand also
decreased in 2008. These factors resulted in the 2008 year-end inventory value of all inventories
using the LIFO method being $23.1 million less than the FIFO value, and the 2008 year end LIFO
reserve balance being $51.7 million less than at the end of 2007. This resulted in a corresponding
decrease of $51.7 million in cost of goods sold for the year. Due to the management of inventory
levels commensurate with declining unit sales volumes during 2008, the Company liquidated the
remainder of the LIFO inventory layer established in 2006 and a portion of the inventory layer
established in 2005. Part of the 2006 layer was depleted in 2007. As a result, under the LIFO
method, these inventory layers were liquidated at historical costs that were less than current
costs, which favorably impacted cost of goods sold by $1.5 million for the full year and net income
for the full year by $1.0 million.
Copper prices began 2007 at a relative low point in the first quarter and then trended upward
significantly in the second quarter, trading in a fairly wide range during the year with
significant volatility from month to month. The 2007 year-end price of copper was slightly below
the 2006 year-end price. The unit volume of inventory on-hand also decreased in 2007. These
factors resulted in the 2007 year-end inventory value of all inventories using the LIFO method
being $74.9 million less than the FIFO value, and $7.4 million less than at the end of 2006. This
resulted in a corresponding decrease of $7.4 million in cost of goods sold for the year. Due to
the management of inventory levels commensurate with declining unit sales volumes during 2007, the
Company liquidated a portion of the LIFO inventory layer established in 2006. As a result, under
the LIFO method, this inventory layer was liquidated at historical costs that were less than
current costs, which favorably impacted cost of goods sold by $689,000 for the full year and net
income for the full year by $454,000.
Gross profit was $50.1 million, or 7.7% of net sales in 2009 compared to $123.4 million, or 11.4%
of net sales in 2008 and $111.3 million or 9.4% of net sales in 2007. The changes in gross profit
were due to the factors discussed above.
Selling expenses, which include freight and sales commissions, were $31.7 million in 2009, $48.0
million in 2008 and $51.1 million in 2007. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses
increased slightly to 4.9% in 2009, versus 4.5% in 2008 and 4.3% in 2007. The 2009 percentage
increase is due to freight costs. Freight costs increased due to shifts in regional sales and
lower average order sizes resulting in higher freight costs. The 2008 increase is attributable to
freight costs increasing on both a percentage and per pound basis due to high diesel fuel costs in
2008
14
and some shifts in regional sales. 2007 was almost unchanged from 2006. General and administrative
expenses, as a percentage of net sales, were 1.8% in 2009, 1.0% in 2008 and 0.8% in 2007. The 2009
and 2008 percentage increases were primarily due to the semi-fixed costs being divided by lower
dollar sales. 2007 was almost unchanged from 2006. During 2008, the Company wrote off $1.4 million
in receivables which were uncollectible, almost entirely due to one customer. The Company wrote
these amounts off against the bad debt reserve. The Company expensed $2.4 million or 0.2% of net
sales during the year resulting in a bad debt reserve balance of $2.0 million. This balance was
raised to this level at year-end after taking into account the current state of the U.S. economy
among other factors.
Interest expense decreased to $3.2 million in 2009 from $4.7 million in 2008 and $5.8 million in
2007. The decreases in 2009 and 2008 were due to lower average interest rates on the same amount
of debt. The Company capitalized interest expense relating to the construction of assets in the
amounts of approximately $354,000 in 2009, $659,000 in 2008 and $829,000 in 2007.
The Companys effective tax rate was 24.3% in 2009, 33.6% in 2008 and 34.2% in 2007, commensurate
with the Companys tax liabilities. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provides a deduction
from income for qualified domestic production activities that generally will be phased in from 2005
through 2010. Accordingly, the impact of any deductions is being reported in the period for which
the deduction will be claimed on the Companys tax return. The domestic production activity
deduction reduced the 2009 effective tax rate approximately 9.1%.
As a result of the foregoing factors, the Companys net income was $3.6 million in 2009, $39.8
million in 2008 and $30.8 million in 2007.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably
likely to have a current or future effect on the Companys financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are
material to investors.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the Companys cash flow activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
28,605 |
|
|
$ |
161,959 |
|
|
$ |
84,785 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(18,783 |
) |
|
|
(17,635 |
) |
|
|
(28,232 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
(5,553 |
) |
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
9,103 |
|
|
$ |
138,771 |
|
|
$ |
54,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a substantial inventory of finished products to satisfy customers prompt
delivery requirements. As is customary in the industry, the Company provides payment terms to most
of its customers that exceed terms that it receives from its suppliers. Therefore, the Companys
liquidity needs have generally consisted of working capital necessary to finance receivables and
inventory. Capital expenditures have historically been necessary to expand and update the
production capacity of the Companys manufacturing operations. The Company has historically
satisfied its liquidity and capital expenditure needs with cash generated from operations,
borrowings under its various debt arrangements and sales of its common stock.
The Company is party to a Financing Agreement with two banks, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as amended, the Financing Agreement). The Financing
Agreement extends through August 6, 2013, and provides for maximum borrowings of the lesser of
$150,000,000 or the amount of eligible accounts receivable plus the amount of eligible finished
goods and raw materials, less any reserves established by the banks. The calculated maximum
borrowing amount available at December 31, 2009, as computed under the Financing Agreement was
$149,660,000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at the Companys option, at
15
either (1) LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 1.0% to 1.75% depending upon the ratio of debt
outstanding to adjusted earnings or (2) the base rate (which is the higher of the federal funds
rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate) plus 0% to 0.25% (depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding to
adjusted earnings). A commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.375% (depending upon the ratio of debt
outstanding to adjusted earnings) is payable on the unused line of credit. On December 31, 2009,
there were no borrowings outstanding under the Financing Agreement.
The Company, through its agent bank, is also a party to a Note Purchase Agreement (the 2004 Note
Purchase Agreement) with Hartford Life Insurance Company, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance
Company, London Life Insurance Company and London Life and Casualty Reinsurance Corporation
(collectively, the 2004 Purchasers), whereby the Company issued and sold $45,000,000 of 5.27%
Senior Notes, Series 2004-A, due August 27, 2011 (the Fixed Rate Senior Notes) to the 2004
Purchasers, the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of the Companys outstanding
indebtedness under its previous financing agreement. Through its agent bank, the Company was also
a party to an interest rate swap agreement to convert the fixed rate on the Fixed Rate Senior Notes
to a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a fixed adder for the seven-year duration of these notes.
Commensurate with declining interest rates, the Company elected to terminate, prior to its
maturity, this swap agreement on November 29, 2007. As a result of this swap termination, the
Company received cash proceeds and realized a net settlement gain of $929,231 that was recorded as
an adjustment to the carrying amount of the related debt in the consolidated balance sheet. This
settlement gain is being amortized into earnings over the remaining term of the associated long
term notes payable. During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, $244,697 and $235,000,
respectively, was recognized as a reduction in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income. The unamortized balance remaining at December 31, 2009 was $430,297.
On September 28, 2006, the Company, through its agent bank, entered into a second Note Purchase
Agreement (the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement) with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife
Insurance Company of Connecticut and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, whereby the
Company issued and sold $55,000,000 of Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series 2006-A, due September 30,
2011 (the Floating Rate Senior Notes), the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of the
Companys outstanding indebtedness under its Financing Agreement.
Obligations under the Financing Agreement, the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior
Notes are unsecured and contain customary covenants and events of default. The Company was not
in compliance with these covenants, as of December 31, 2009. The Company has received a waiver for
these covenant violations from the two banks with whom the Company has the Financing Agreement.
Under the Financing Agreement, the 2004 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2006 Note Purchase
Agreement, the Company is allowed to pay cash dividends subject to calculated limits based on
earnings. At December 31, 2009, the total balance outstanding under the Financing Agreement was
zero, while the total balance under the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior Notes
was $45 million and $55 million, respectively. Amounts outstanding under the Financing Agreement
are payable on August 6, 2013, with interest payments due quarterly. Interest payments on the
Fixed Rate Senior Notes are due semi-annually, while interest payments on the Floating Rate Senior
Notes are due quarterly. Obligations under the Financing Agreement, the 2004 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement are the only contractual borrowing obligations or
commercial borrowing commitments of the Company.
As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys Fixed Rate Senior Notes was
$45,430,297. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys Fixed Rate Senior Notes,
estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on market yields, and taking into
consideration the underlying terms of the debt, such as coupon rate and term to maturity, was
$46,865,163. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys Floating Rate Senior
Notes was $55,000,000, which approximated their fair value.
On January 15, 2010, the Company used available cash to pay off all of its outstanding debt,
comprised of the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior Notes. This $100 million in
debt was paid off with a payment totaling $103.8 million, which included accrued and unpaid
interest, along with a pre-payment fee applicable to the Fixed Rate Senior Notes. The Company will
incur a charge of $2.6 million in 2010 in connection with this transaction and expects to realize a
net cash savings of $1.8 million based on current interest rates over the original remaining life of the notes.
On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the
Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of
the Company. The Companys Board of Directors has subsequently authorized annual extensions of
this stock repurchase program through February 28, 2011 authorizing the Company to repurchase up to
the remaining 610,000 shares of its common stock. On February 15, 2010, the Board of directors
added an additional 2 million shares to this authorization, authorizing the Company to purchase up
to 2,610,000 of its shares through February 28, 2011. The Company repurchased zero shares of its
stock in 2009 and 265,600 shares of its stock in 2008.
16
Cash provided by operations was $28.6 million in 2009 compared to cash provided by operations of
$162.0 million in 2008 and cash provided by operations of $84.8 million in 2007. The decrease in
cash provided by operations of $133.4 million in 2009 versus 2008 was due primarily to the $95.5
million increase in the accounts receivable category from 2008 to 2009. In 2008, Accounts
receivable fell $88.2 million, while in 2009 Accounts Receivable rose by $7.3 million resulting in
the decrease of $95.5 million in cash related to Accounts Receivable. Also contributing to the
decreased cash provided by operations in 2009 was the decrease in net income of $36.1 million, and
an $11.8 million negative swing in deferred income taxes partially offset by an increase in
accounts payable and other accrued liabilities of $24.9 million.
The increase in cash provided by operations of $77.2 million in 2008 versus 2007 was due primarily
to the $90.2 million positive change in accounts receivable, a $9.6 million positive swing in
prepaid expenses and a $9.0 million positive change in net income, offset primarily by a $28.7
million negative swing in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Receivables decreased
dramatically in the fourth quarter of 2008 as copper prices plunged in concert with the global
collapse in commodity prices driving down the selling price of copper electric building wire as
discussed throughout this report. Inventories, net of the LIFO reserve also declined by $16.5
million in 2008 after a similar decline of $21.9 million in 2007. Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities decreased dramatically in 2008 due to the drop in commodity prices along with the
Company having paid for virtually all of its 2008 purchases prior to year-end. Very little raw
material was received in the latter part of December 2008 ahead of the planned holiday maintenance
shut-down.
Cash used in investing activities increased marginally to $18.8 million in 2009 from $17.6 million
in 2008, versus $28.2 million in 2007. In both 2009 and 2008, capital expenditures were made on
various machinery and equipment purchases. In 2007, capital expenditures were made primarily to
construct a new office building and continue the armored cable expansion.
The cash used in financing activities of $0.7 million in 2009 consisted of $1.8 million in dividend
payments offset by $0.7 million proceeds from issuance of company stock related to employees
exercising stock options and $0.4 million arising from excess tax benefits of the options
exercised. The cash used in financing activities of $5.6 million in 2008 consisted primarily of
$4.0 million for the stock repurchase program discussed above and $1.9 million to pay dividends.
The cash used in financing activities of $2.3 million in 2007 was used primarily for the stock
repurchase program of $2.0 million and to pay dividends of $1.9 million, offset by the $0.9 million
cash received to terminate a swap agreement discussed above and $0.6 million of proceeds from the
issuance of company stock related to employees exercising stock options.
During 2010, the Company expects its capital expenditures will consist primarily of maintaining and
adding manufacturing equipment for its building wire operations and the construction of a Research
and Development Building on its campus. The Company also expects its future working capital
requirements may fluctuate as a result of changes in unit sales volumes and the price of copper and
other raw materials. The Company believes that its cash balance, cash flow from operations and the
financing available from its revolving credit facility will satisfy working capital and capital
expenditure requirements for the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
As shown below, the Company had the following contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period ($ in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
3-5 Years |
|
5 Years |
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
25,614 |
|
|
|
25,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
125,614 |
|
|
$ |
125,614 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Amounts listed as purchase obligations consist of open purchase orders for major raw
material purchases and $4.2 million of capital equipment and construction purchase orders open
as of December 31, 2009. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based
upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles
17
generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. See Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies
affect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using the last-in, first out (LIFO) method, or market.
The Company maintains only one inventory pool for LIFO purposes as all inventories held by the
Company generally relate to the Companys only business segment, the manufacture and sale of copper
electrical building wire products. As permitted by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,
the Company maintains its inventory costs and cost of goods sold on a first-in, first-out (FIFO)
basis and makes a quarterly adjustment to adjust total inventory and cost of goods sold from FIFO
to LIFO. The Company applies the lower of cost or market (LCM) test by comparing the LIFO cost of
its raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods inventories to estimated market values, which
are based primarily upon the most recent quoted market price of copper and finished wire prices as
of the end of each reporting period. The Company performs a lower of cost or market calculation
quarterly. As of December 31, 2009, no LCM adjustment was required. However, decreases in copper
prices could necessitate establishing an LCM reserve in future periods. Additionally, future
reductions in the quantity of inventory on hand could cause copper that is carried in inventory at
costs different from the cost of copper in the period in which the reduction occurs to be included
in costs of goods sold for that period at the different price.
Revenue from the sale of the Companys products is recognized when goods are shipped to the
customer, title and risk of loss are transferred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection
is reasonably assured. A provision for payment discounts and customer rebates is estimated based
upon historical experience and other relevant factors and is recorded within the same period that
the revenue is recognized.
The Company has provided an allowance for losses on customer receivables based upon estimates of
those customers inability to make required payments. Such allowance is established and adjusted
based upon the makeup of the current receivable portfolio, past bad debt experience and current
market conditions. If the financial condition of our customers was to deteriorate and impair their
ability to make payments to the Company, additional allowances for losses might be required in
future periods.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance effective for interim or annual financial periods
ending after June 15, 2009, to modify the definition and disclosures of subsequent events. The
guidance sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a
reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements; (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements; and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. Subsequent events for the reporting period ended December
31, 2009 were evaluated through the time we issued our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. At the effective date, the
accounting standards codification issued by the FASB has become the source of authoritative US GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The adoption of these authoritative
accounting rules for the year ended December 31, 2009 did not change our accounting practices.
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on
managements belief as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to
management. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been
correct. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one
or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected.
18
Among the key factors that may have a direct bearing on the Companys operating results and stock
price are:
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the global and national economy. |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the level of activity in the construction and remodeling industries. |
|
|
|
|
Demand for the Companys products. |
|
|
|
|
The impact of price competition on the Companys margins. |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the price of copper and other key raw materials. |
|
|
|
|
The loss of key manufacturers representatives who sell the Companys product line. |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in utility costs, especially electricity and natural gas. |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in insurance costs of various types. |
|
|
|
|
Weather related disasters at the Companys and/or key vendors operating facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Stock price fluctuations due to stock market expectations. |
|
|
|
|
Unforeseen future legal issues and/or government regulatory changes. |
|
|
|
|
Patent and intellectual property disputes. |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the Companys financial position or national banking issues that impede
the Companys ability to obtain reasonable financing. |
This list highlights some of the major factors that could affect the Companys operations or stock
price, but cannot enumerate all the potential issues that management faces on a daily basis, many
of which are totally out of managements control. For further discussion of the factors described
herein and their potential effects on the Company, see Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors,
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The Company does not engage in metal futures trading or hedging activities and does not enter into
derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. However,
the Company is generally exposed to commodity price and interest rate risks.
The Company purchases copper cathode primarily from miners and commodity brokers at prices
determined each month based on the average daily COMEX closing prices for copper for that month,
plus a negotiated premium. As a result, fluctuations in copper prices caused by market forces can
significantly affect the Companys financial results.
Interest rate risk is attributable to the Companys long-term debt. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company was a party to the Financing Agreement, the 2004 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2006 Note
Purchase Agreement. On January 15, 2010, the Company paid off all of its outstanding debt under
the 2004 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement.
Amounts outstanding under the Financing Agreement, as amended, are payable on August 6, 2013, with
interest payments due quarterly. At December 31, 2009, amounts outstanding under the $45 million
2004 Note Purchase Agreement were payable on August 27, 2011, with interest only payments due
semi-annually and amounts outstanding under the $55 million 2006 Note Purchase Agreement were
payable on September 30, 2011, with interest only payments due quarterly. At December 31, 2009,
the balance outstanding under the Financing Agreement was zero, the total balance under the 2004
and 2006 Note Purchase Agreements was $45 million and $55 million, respectively, and the average
interest rate was 3.16%.
There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings under the Financing Agreement as such borrowings
mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or
predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Companys future financing
requirements. Assuming that the Company had $100 million of outstanding debt, an average 1%
interest rate increase in 2010 would increase the Companys interest expense by $1,000,000.
For further information, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto appear on the following
pages.
19
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Encore Wire Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Encore Wire Corporation (the
Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Encore Wire Corporation at December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Encore Wire Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 5,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 5, 2010
20
Encore Wire Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
In Thousands of Dollars, Except Share Data |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
226,769 |
|
|
$ |
217,666 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for losses of $2,278 and
$2,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
133,176 |
|
|
|
126,184 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
42,563 |
|
|
|
65,533 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
407,499 |
|
|
|
411,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements |
|
|
13,177 |
|
|
|
11,727 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
7,483 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
68,125 |
|
|
|
65,026 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
168,984 |
|
|
|
156,234 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,509 |
|
|
|
247,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(136,653 |
) |
|
|
(125,632 |
) |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
126,856 |
|
|
|
121,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
534,558 |
|
|
$ |
533,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
11,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,639 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,140 |
|
|
|
20,104 |
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
8,982 |
|
Current portion of notes payable |
|
|
100,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
130,617 |
|
|
|
33,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,957 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,675 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares
2,000,000. Issued and outstanding shares none. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares 40,000,000
Issued shares 26,308,002 in 2009 and 26,145,452 in 2008 |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
44,057 |
|
|
|
42,486 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 3,148,950 shares in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
(21,269 |
) |
|
|
(21,269 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
369,933 |
|
|
|
368,140 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
392,984 |
|
|
|
389,619 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
534,558 |
|
|
$ |
533,339 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
21
Encore Wire Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
649,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,081,132 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,786 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
599,498 |
|
|
|
957,767 |
|
|
|
1,073,451 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
50,115 |
|
|
|
123,365 |
|
|
|
111,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
43,767 |
|
|
|
61,180 |
|
|
|
60,400 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,348 |
|
|
|
62,185 |
|
|
|
50,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,181 |
) |
|
|
(4,704 |
) |
|
|
(5,834 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
59,897 |
|
|
|
46,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
20,126 |
|
|
|
16,014 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,636 |
|
|
$ |
39,771 |
|
|
$ |
30,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic |
|
|
23,011 |
|
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
23,298 |
|
|
|
23,396 |
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
22
Encore Wire Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Treasury |
|
Retained |
|
|
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Stock |
|
Earnings |
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
26,035 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
40,849 |
|
|
|
(15,275 |
) |
|
|
301,287 |
|
|
|
327,121 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,796 |
|
|
|
30,796 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
Dividend declared $0.08 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
26,124 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
41,806 |
|
|
|
(17,315 |
) |
|
|
330,217 |
|
|
|
354,969 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,771 |
|
|
|
39,771 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
Dividend declared $0.08 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,848 |
) |
|
|
(1,848 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,954 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
26,145 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
42,486 |
|
|
$ |
(21,269 |
) |
|
$ |
368,140 |
|
|
$ |
389,619 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
Dividend declared $0.08 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
26,308 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
44,057 |
|
|
$ |
(21,269 |
) |
|
$ |
369,933 |
|
|
$ |
392,984 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
23
Encore Wire Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,636 |
|
|
$ |
39,771 |
|
|
$ |
30,796 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,691 |
|
|
|
13,933 |
|
|
|
13,819 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
Excess tax benefits of options exercised |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Other |
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(7,270 |
) |
|
|
88,183 |
|
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
22,970 |
|
|
|
16,480 |
|
|
|
21,934 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,336 |
|
|
|
(20,584 |
) |
|
|
8,148 |
|
Current income taxes payable (receivable) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
8,295 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
162,092 |
|
|
|
84,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(22,950 |
) |
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
(28,491 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(18,783 |
) |
|
|
(17,635 |
) |
|
|
(28,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
Excess tax benefits of options exercised |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
Termination of interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,954 |
) |
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
(5,686 |
) |
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,103 |
|
|
|
138,771 |
|
|
|
54,292 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
217,666 |
|
|
|
78,895 |
|
|
|
24,603 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
226,769 |
|
|
$ |
217,666 |
|
|
$ |
78,895 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
24
Encore Wire Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Business
The Company conducts its business in one segment the manufacture of copper electric building
wire, principally NM-B cable, for use primarily as interior wiring in homes, apartments, and
manufactured housing, and THWN-2 cable and armored cable for use primarily as wiring in commercial
and industrial buildings. The Company sells its products primarily through 30 manufacturers
representatives located throughout the United States and, to a lesser extent, through its own
direct marketing efforts. The principal customers for Encores building wire are wholesale
electrical distributors.
Copper, a commodity product, is the principal raw material used in the Companys manufacturing
operations. Copper accounted for 73.5%, 90.3%, and 86.5% of its cost of goods sold during 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively. The price of copper fluctuates, depending on general economic
conditions and in relation to supply and demand and other factors, and has caused monthly
variations in the cost of copper purchased by the Company. The Company cannot predict copper prices
in the future or the effect of fluctuations on the cost of copper on the Companys future operating
results.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned
subsidiary. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon
consolidation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance effective for interim or annual financial
periods ending after June 15, 2009, to modify the definition and disclosures of subsequent events.
The guidance sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a
reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements; (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements; and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. Subsequent events for the reporting period ended December
31, 2009 were evaluated through the time we issued our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. At the effective date, the
accounting standards codification issued by the FASB has become the source of authoritative US GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The adoption of these authoritative
accounting rules for the year ended December 31, 2009 did not change our accounting practices.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of the Companys products is recognized when goods are shipped to the
customer, title and risk of loss are transferred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection
is reasonably assured. A provision for payment discounts and customer rebates is estimated based
upon historical experience and other relevant factors and is recorded within the same period that
the revenue is recognized.
25
Freight Expenses
The Company classifies shipping and handling costs as a component of selling, general and
administrative expenses. Shipping and handling costs were approximately $14.5 million, $19.9
million, and $19.5 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company holds certain items that are required to be measured at fair value, primarily cash
equivalents held in money market funds. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy is followed for disclosure to show
the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value measurements:
Level 1 Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in
active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 Inputs used to measure fair value, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are
either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date through correlation with market
data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted
prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued
using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the
input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are
corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full
term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 Inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or
no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are
generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize managements estimates
of market participant assumptions.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys fair value of cash equivalents of $226.8 million and
$217.7 million, respectively, approximated carrying value due to the short maturity of these
financial instruments and was categorized as a Level 1 measurement.
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair value of the Companys
financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
Notes payable |
|
$ |
100,430 |
|
|
$ |
101,865 |
|
|
$ |
100,675 |
|
|
$ |
100,025 |
|
The fair market value of the fixed rate debt was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis
based on market yields, taking into consideration the underlying terms of the debt, such as coupon
rate and term to maturity. The fair market value of the floating rate debt approximates its
carrying value.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers (primarily wholesale electrical
distributors, manufactured housing suppliers and retail home improvement centers) related to the
sale of the Companys products. Such receivables are uncollateralized and are generally due from a
diverse group of customers located throughout the United States. The Company establishes an
allowance for losses based upon the makeup of the current portfolio, past bad debt experience and
current market conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Losses Progression (In Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Beginning balance January 1 |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
884 |
|
(Write offs) of bad debts, net of collections of previous write offs |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Bad debt provision |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
2,278 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
26
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys cash equivalents
consisted of investments in money market funds with the Companys banks.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market.
The Company evaluates the market value of its raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods
inventory primarily based upon current raw material and finished goods prices at the end of each
period.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment for financial reporting is provided on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: buildings
and improvements, 15 to 39 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 10 years; and furniture and
fixtures, 3 to 15 years. Accelerated cost recovery methods are used for tax purposes. Repairs and
maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company follows the fair value based method in accounting for equity-based compensation. Under
the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair
value of the award and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related service period.
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation are recognized as an increase to additional paid-in
capital and as a part of cash flows from financing activities.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per common and common equivalent share are computed using the weighted average number of
shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The dilutive
effects of stock options, which are common stock equivalents, are calculated using the treasury
stock method.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for based on the liability method, resulting in deferred income tax
assets and liabilities arising due to temporary differences. Temporary differences are differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial
statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period
from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. There were no
differences between comprehensive income and reported income in the periods presented.
2. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
14,497 |
|
|
$ |
16,184 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
12,239 |
|
|
|
8,746 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
75,239 |
|
|
|
63,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,975 |
|
|
|
88,648 |
|
Adjust to LIFO cost |
|
|
(59,412 |
) |
|
|
(23,115 |
) |
Lower of cost or market adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,563 |
|
|
$ |
65,533 |
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the Company liquidated a portion of the layer established in 2005. As a result, under
the LIFO method, this inventory layer was liquidated at historical costs that were less than
current costs, which favorably impacted net income for the full year by $9.9 million.
27
During 2008, the Company liquidated the remainder of the LIFO inventory layer established in 2006
and a portion of the layer established in 2005. As a result, under the LIFO method, this inventory
layer was liquidated at historical costs that were less than current costs, which favorably
impacted net income for the full year by $1.0 million.
3. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Sales volume discounts payable |
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
|
$ |
12,706 |
|
Property taxes payable |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
Commissions payable |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
Accrued salaries |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,140 |
|
|
$ |
20,104 |
|
|
|
|
4. Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
5.27% Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Unrecognized gain on swap termination |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,430 |
|
|
$ |
100,675 |
|
|
|
|
The Company is party to a Financing Agreement with two banks, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as amended, the Financing Agreement). The Financing
Agreement extends through August 6, 2013, and provides for maximum borrowings of the lesser of
$150,000,000 or the amount of eligible accounts receivable plus the amount of eligible finished
goods and raw materials, less any reserves established by the banks. The calculated maximum
borrowing amount available at December 31, 2009, as computed under the Financing Agreement was
$149,660,000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at the Companys option, at either
(1) LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 1.0% to 1.75% depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding
to adjusted earnings or (2) the base rate (which is the higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5%
or the prime rate) plus 0% to 0.25% (depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding to adjusted
earnings). A commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.375% (depending upon the ratio of debt
outstanding to adjusted earnings) is payable on the unused line of credit. On December 31, 2009,
there were no borrowings outstanding under the Financing Agreement.
The Company, through its agent bank, is also a party to a Note Purchase Agreement (the 2004 Note
Purchase Agreement) with Hartford Life Insurance Company, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance
Company, London Life Insurance Company and London Life and Casualty Reinsurance Corporation
(collectively, the 2004 Purchasers), whereby the Company issued and sold $45,000,000 of 5.27%
Senior Notes, Series 2004-A, due August 27, 2011 (the Fixed Rate Senior Notes) to the 2004
Purchasers, the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of the Companys outstanding
indebtedness under its previous financing agreement. Through its agent bank, the Company was also
a party to an interest rate swap agreement to convert the fixed rate on the Fixed Rate Senior Notes
to a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a fixed adder for the seven-year duration of these notes.
Commensurate with declining interest rates, the Company elected to terminate, prior to its
maturity, this swap agreement on November 29, 2007. As a result of this swap termination, the
Company received cash proceeds and realized a net settlement gain of $929,231 that was recorded as
an adjustment to the carrying amount of the related debt in the consolidated balance sheet. This
settlement gain is being amortized into earnings over the remaining term of the associated long
term notes payable. During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, $244,697 and $235,000,
respectively, was recognized as a reduction in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income. The unamortized balance remaining at December 31, 2009 was $430,297.
On September 28, 2006, the Company, through its agent bank, entered into a second Note Purchase
Agreement (the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement) with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife
Insurance Company of
Connecticut and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, whereby the Company issued and sold
$55,000,000 of Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series 2006-A, due September 30, 2011 (the Floating
Rate Senior Notes), the
proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of the Companys
outstanding indebtedness under its Financing Agreement.
28
Obligations under the Financing Agreement, the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior
Notes are unsecured and contain customary covenants and events of default. The Company was not
in compliance with these covenants, as of December 31, 2009. The Company has received a waiver for
these covenant violations from the two banks with whom the Company has the Financing Agreement.
Under the Financing Agreement, the 2004 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2006 Note Purchase
Agreement, the Company is allowed to pay cash dividends subject to calculated limits based on
earnings. At December 31, 2009, the total balance outstanding under the Financing Agreement was
zero, while the total balance under the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior Notes
was $45 million and $55 million, respectively. Amounts outstanding under the Financing Agreement
are payable on August 6, 2013, with interest payments due quarterly. Interest payments on the
Fixed Rate Senior Notes are due semi-annually, while interest payments on the Floating Rate Senior
Notes are due quarterly. Obligations under the Financing Agreement, the 2004 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement are the only contractual borrowing obligations or
commercial borrowing commitments of the Company.
As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys Fixed Rate Senior Notes was
$45,430,297. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys Fixed Rate Senior Notes,
estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on market yields, and taking into
consideration the underlying terms of the debt, such as coupon rate and term to maturity, was
$46,865,163. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys Floating Rate Senior
Notes was $55,000,000, which approximated their fair value.
On January 15, 2010, the Company used available cash to pay off all of its outstanding debt,
comprised of the Fixed Rate Senior Notes and the Floating Rate Senior Notes. This $100 million in
debt was paid off with a payment totaling $103.8 million, which included accrued and unpaid
interest, along with a pre-payment fee applicable to the Fixed Rate Senior Notes. The Company will
incur a charge of $2.6 million in 2010 in connection with this
transaction.
The Company paid interest totaling $3.2 million, $4.7 million and $5.8 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The Company capitalized $354,000, $659,000 and $829,000 of interest in 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
5. Income Taxes
The provisions for income tax expense are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
6,819 |
|
|
$ |
13,630 |
|
|
$ |
10,310 |
|
State |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
$ |
20,126 |
|
|
$ |
16,014 |
|
|
|
|
The differences between the provision for income taxes and income taxes computed using the federal
income tax rate are as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount computed using the statutory rate |
|
$ |
1,680 |
|
|
$ |
20,964 |
|
|
$ |
16,384 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
Qualified domestic production activity deduction |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
(656 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
$ |
20,126 |
|
|
$ |
16,014 |
|
|
|
|
29
The tax effect of each type of temporary difference giving rise to the net deferred tax liability
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Depreciation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,957 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,320 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
Uniform capitalization rules |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,105 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,957 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,982 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,320 |
) |
|
|
|
The Company made income tax payments of $8.1 million in 2009, $15.1 million in 2008 and $19.8
million in 2007.
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was passed, which provides a
deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities which generally will be phased
in from 2005 through 2010. This deduction lowered the Companys effective tax rate by $439,000, or
approximately 9.1%, for 2009. Relatively small dollar amounts of tax adjustments have had larger
percentage impact in 2009 as the pre-tax earnings approached the break even level.
The Companys federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to December 31, 2005 remain
subject to examination. The Companys income tax returns in major state income tax jurisdictions
remain subject to examination for various periods subsequent to December 31, 2004. The Company has
no reserves for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2009. Interest and penalties resulting
from audits by tax authorities have been immaterial and are included in the provision for income
taxes in the consolidated statements of income.
6. Stock Options
The Company had one stock option plan that provided for the grant of stock options to its
directors, officers and key employees. The Company granted stock option awards at prices equal to
the market value of its stock on the date of grant. These options vest ratably over a period of
five years from the time the options were granted with maximum terms of ten years. The Encore Wire
Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan expired on June 28, 2009. The Board of Directors has adopted a
new 2010 stock option plan that is subject to approval of the Companys stockholders at the 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded $451,303, $426,388 and $241,579 respectively, of
stock based compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The income tax
benefit realized in excess of book deductions associated with stock based compensation totaled
$363,455, $98,494 and $95,315 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following presents a summary of stock option activity for the year ending December 31, 2009
(aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
633,976 |
|
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
20.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(162,550 |
) |
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
483,926 |
|
|
$ |
14.09 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
330,166 |
|
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
$ |
3,222 |
|
|
|
|
30
The fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes options pricing model and the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
5.0 years |
|
5.0 years |
|
5.0 years |
We base expected volatilities on historical volatilities of our common stock. The expected life
represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding
giving consideration to vesting periods and managements consideration of historical exercise
patterns. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant for periods corresponding to the expected life of the option.
ASC 718 requires the estimation of forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and adjustment
of the estimated forfeiture rate over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ
from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up
adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change and impacts the amount of un-recognized
compensation expense to be recorded in future periods.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the weighted average grant date fair
value of options granted was $20.96, $7.70, and $9.18, respectively, and the total intrinsic value
of options exercised was $2.6 million, $283,000, and $1.5 million, respectively. As of December 31,
2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options of $1.2 million was
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.84 years.
7. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,636 |
|
|
$ |
39,771 |
|
|
$ |
30,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per
share weighted average shares |
|
|
23,011 |
|
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share weighted average shares |
|
|
23,298 |
|
|
|
23,396 |
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
|
|
Stock options to purchase common stock at exercise prices in excess of the average actual stock
price for the period that were anti-dilutive and that were excluded from the determination of
diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Weighted average anti-dilutive stock options |
|
|
168,954 |
|
|
|
208,750 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
25.37 |
|
|
$ |
22.17 |
|
|
$ |
37.95 |
|
8. Stockholders Equity
On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the
Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of
the Company. The Companys Board of Directors has subsequently authorized annual extensions of
this stock repurchase program through February 28, 2011 authorizing the Company to repurchase up to
the remaining 610,000 shares of its common stock. On February
31
15, 2010, the Board of directors added an additional 2 million shares to this authorization,
authorizing the Company to purchase up to 2,610,000 of its shares through February 28, 2011. The
Company repurchased zero shares of its stock in 2009 and 265,600 shares of its stock in 2008.
9. Contingencies
On July 7, 2009, Southwire Company, a Delaware corporation (Southwire), filed a
complaint for patent infringement against the Company and Cerro Wire, Inc. in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In the
complaint, Southwire alleges that the Company has infringed one or more claims of
United States Patent No. 7,557,301, entitled Method of Manufacturing Electrical Cable
Having Reduced Required Force for Installation, by making and selling electrical cables,
including the Companys Super Slick cables. On February 5, 2010, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (the USPTO) ordered the re-examination of the U.S. Patent 7,557,301.
In ordering re-examination of Southwires 301 patent, the USPTO has determined that the
Companys submission of prior art not previously considered during the original
examination of the 301 patent has raised a substantial new question of
patentability of the claims of the 301 patent. In the re-examination,
an Examiner in the USPTO will review the claims of the Southwire 301
patent and make a new determination of the patentability of those claims.
On August 24, 2009, Southwire filed a second complaint for
patent and trademark infringement against the Company.
In the second complaint, Southwire has alleged that the
Company infringed one or more of the claims of United States Patent No. 6,486,395
entitled Interlocked Metal Clad Cable by making and selling electrical cables,
including the Companys MCMP Multipurpose cables. Southwire has also alleged that the
Company has infringed Southwires United States Trademark registration for the mark, MCAP,
Registration No. 3,292,777. The second complaint also alleges violations of Federal, State and
Common law unfair competition claims. The Company has filed counterclaims against Southwire
alleging claims of statutory and common law unfair competition violations, tortious interference
with existing and prospective business relations, misappropriation and claims for declaratory relief.
The complaints seek unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The Company disputes
all of Southwires claims and alleged damages and intends to vigorously defend the
lawsuits and vigorously pursue its own claims.
The Company is also a party to litigation and claims arising out of the ordinary business of the Company.
10. Encore Wire 401(k) Plan
The Company sponsors an employee savings plan (the 401(k) Plan) that is intended to provide
participating employees with additional income upon retirement. Employees may contribute between
1% and 15% of eligible compensation to the 401(k) Plan. The Company matches 50% of the first 6%
deferred by employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan and related
Company matching contributions after one year of service. Employer matching contributions are
vested at a rate of 20% per year and are fully vested after five years of employment. The
Companys matching contributions were $329,474, $302,911 and $369,241 in fiscal years 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
11. Related Party Transactions
The Company purchases certain finished goods inventory components from a company that is partially
owned by a family member of an individual serving on its Board of Directors. The Company purchases
these products from this company, which totaled approximately $4.8, $5.6 million and $6.2 million
in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, at prices that are no less favorable than, are
available from non-affiliated parties. Additionally, for a minor portion of its freight
requirements, the Company uses a freight carrier that is owned by a family member of one of the
Companys executive officers. During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, amounts paid to the
affiliated freight carrier were not significant. The Company obtains quotes and purchases these
items from other vendors at prices that confirm that the Company is obtaining prices that are no
less favorable than are available from non-affiliated parties. Each of these transactions was
approved by the audit committee pursuant to the Related Party Transactions Policy.
32
12. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the two years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
2009 |
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
144,485 |
|
|
$ |
159,351 |
|
|
$ |
168,695 |
|
|
$ |
177,082 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
11,860 |
|
|
|
11,355 |
|
|
|
9,065 |
|
Net income |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
2008 |
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
281,759 |
|
|
$ |
322,845 |
|
|
$ |
296,338 |
|
|
$ |
180,190 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
35,470 |
|
|
|
19,523 |
|
|
|
28,345 |
|
|
|
40,027 |
|
Net income |
|
|
13,619 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
8,077 |
|
|
|
16,744 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
33
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect the
information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC, and to process,
summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC.
Based on an evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the
end of the period covered by this report conducted by the Companys management, with the
participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in this annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 was recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by the Company in such report was accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) for the Company.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control
systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who audited the Companys
consolidated financial statements, has also audited the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009. Ernst & Young LLPs attestation report on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting appears directly below.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Daniel L. Jones
Daniel L. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
President , Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Frank J. Bilban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank J. Bilban |
|
|
|
|
Vice President Finance, Treasurer, Secretary
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
34
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Encore Wire Corporation
We have audited Encore Wire Corporations (the Company) internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying managements report. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Encore Wire Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Encore Wire Corporation as of December
31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated March
5, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 5, 2010
35
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting or in other
factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting during the Companys last fiscal quarter.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
The section entitled Election of Directors, Corporate Governance and Other Board Matters and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance appearing in the Companys proxy
statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 4, 2010 sets forth certain
information with respect to the directors of the Company, Section 16(a) reporting obligations of
directors and officers, the Companys audit committee, the Companys audit committee financial
expert, the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors
and the Companys code of ethics that is incorporated herein by reference. Certain information
with respect to persons who are or may be deemed to be executive officers of the Company is set
forth under the caption Executive Officers of the Company in Part I of this report.
In connection with Companys long-standing commitment to conduct its business in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with its ethical principles, the Board of
Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees, officers,
directors, and advisors of the Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Company is
available under the Investors section of the Companys website at http://www.encorewire.com, and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The section entitled Executive Compensation appearing in the Companys proxy statement for the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 4, 2010, sets forth certain information with
respect to the compensation of management of the Company and compensation committee interlocks and
insider participation and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The section entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Executive
Officers appearing in the Companys proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be
held on May 4, 2010 sets forth certain information with respect to the ownership of the Companys
common stock, and is incorporated herein by reference. Certain information with respect to the
Companys equity compensation plans that is required to be set forth in this Item 12 is set forth
under the caption Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The section entitled Executive Compensation Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Corporate Governance and Other Board Matters Board Independence appearing in the Companys
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 4, 2010 sets forth certain
information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions, and director
independence, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The Section entitled Proposal Three Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm appearing in the Companys proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders
to be held on May 4, 2010, sets forth certain information with respect to certain fees paid to
accountants, and is incorporated herein by reference.
36
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 above are filed as part of this annual report. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules included in Item 8 herein: |
|
|
|
|
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are
inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
|
|
The information required by this Item 15(a)(3) is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Encore
Wire Corporation has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
Date: March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ DANIEL L. JONES
|
|
|
|
Daniel L. Jones |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of Encore Wire Corporation and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DANIEL L. JONES
Daniel L. Jones |
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ FRANK J. BILBAN
Frank J. Bilban |
|
Vice President-Finance,
Treasurer, Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ DONALD E. COURTNEY
Donald E. Courtney |
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ JOHN H. WILSON
John H. Wilson |
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ WILLIAM R. THOMAS, III
William R. Thomas, III |
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ SCOTT D. WEAVER
Scott D. Weaver |
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
/s/ THOMAS L. CUNNINGHAM
Thomas L. Cunningham |
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010 |
38
INDEX TO EXHIBITS**
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Encore Wire Corporation and all
amendments thereto (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Encore Wire Corporation,
as amended through December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Credit Agreement by and among Encore Wire Limited, as Borrower,
Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lenders, dated
August 27, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement of August 27, 2004, dated
May 16, 2006 by and among Encore Wire Limited, as Borrower,
Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lenders (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement of August 27, 2004, dated
August 31, 2006 by and among Encore Wire Limited, as Borrower,
Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lenders (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement of August 27, 2004, dated
June 29, 2007 by and among Encore Wire Corporation, as
Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and Bank of America,
N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lenders
(filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement of August 27, 2004, dated
August 6, 2008, by and among Encore Wire Corporation, as
Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and Bank of America,
N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lenders
(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement for $45,000,000 of 5.27% Senior
Notes, Series 2004-A due August 27, 2011, by and among Encore
Wire Limited and Encore Wire Corporation, as Debtors, and
Hartford Life Insurance Company, Great-West Life and Annuity
Insurance Company, London Life Insurance Company and London
Life and Casualty Reinsurance Corporation, as Purchasers, dated
August 1, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Waiver to Note Purchase Agreement for $45,000,000 of 5.27%
Senior Notes, Series 2004-A, due August 27, 2011, by and among
Encore Wire Limited and Encore Wire Corporation, as Debtors,
and Hartford Life Insurance Company, Great-West Life and
Annuity Insurance Company, London Life Insurance Company,
London Life and General Reinsurance Company Limited, as
Holders, dated June 29, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
39
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.8
|
|
Master Note Purchase Agreement for $300,000,000 Aggregate
Principal Amount of Senior Notes Issuable in Series, by and
among Encore Wire Limited and Encore Wire Corporation, as
Debtors, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife
Insurance Company of Connecticut and Great-West Life & Annuity
Insurance Company, as Purchasers, dated September 28, 2006
(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Waiver to Master Note Purchase Agreement for $55,000,000 of
Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series 2006-A, due September 30,
2011, by and among Encore Wire Limited and Encore Wire
Corporation, as Debtors, and Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company, Metlife Insurance Company of Connecticut and
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, as Holders, dated
June 29, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, effective as
of February 20, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-138165), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.11*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1999 Stock Option Plan
(filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Daniel L. Jones, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, dated March 5, 2010 and submitted
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Frank J. Bilban, Vice President Finance,
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, dated March 5, 2010 and submitted pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Daniel L. Jones, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, dated March 5, 2010 as required by 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by Frank J. Bilban, Vice President Finance,
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, dated March
5, 2010 as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan |
40