e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 2010
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number:
001-14437
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
52-2115953
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Westpointe Corporate Center One,
5th
Floor
1550 Coraopolis Heights Road
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15108-2973
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number,
including area code:
(412) 893-0026
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No þ
Number of shares of the Corporations common stock
(Common Stock) outstanding as of July 30, 2010
was 30,080,908.
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES
As used in this report, the terms RTI,
Company, Registrant, we,
our, and us, mean RTI International
Metals, Inc., its predecessors, and consolidated subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
106,651
|
|
|
$
|
104,354
|
|
|
$
|
214,536
|
|
|
$
|
210,408
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
89,702
|
|
|
|
90,859
|
|
|
|
170,064
|
|
|
|
180,621
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,418
|
|
|
|
14,595
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
31,142
|
|
Research, technical, and product development expenses
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
Asset and asset-related charges (income)
|
|
|
(2,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
(1,603
|
)
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
(4,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
|
13,806
|
|
|
|
(4,336
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(8,071
|
)
|
|
|
(2,801
|
)
|
|
|
(7,831
|
)
|
|
|
(3,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,239
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
21,637
|
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
29,903,061
|
|
|
|
22,898,490
|
|
|
|
29,885,280
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
30,100,762
|
|
|
|
22,971,124
|
|
|
|
30,117,232
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
104,327
|
|
|
$
|
56,216
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
20,152
|
|
|
|
65,042
|
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $670 and
$646
|
|
|
62,624
|
|
|
|
60,924
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
269,333
|
|
|
|
266,887
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
21,324
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
21,845
|
|
|
|
21,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
499,605
|
|
|
|
491,716
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
252,535
|
|
|
|
252,301
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
41,068
|
|
|
|
41,068
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
13,814
|
|
|
|
14,299
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
54,975
|
|
|
|
53,814
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
863,193
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
36,230
|
|
|
$
|
39,193
|
|
Accrued wages and other employee costs
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
9,796
|
|
Unearned revenues
|
|
|
15,434
|
|
|
|
21,832
|
|
Current liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Current liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,281
|
|
|
|
30,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
87,564
|
|
|
|
103,955
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Noncurrent liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
35,084
|
|
|
|
34,530
|
|
Noncurrent liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
28,805
|
|
|
|
28,102
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
|
8,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
159,000
|
|
|
|
175,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 30,804,117 and 30,724,351 shares issued;
30,079,436 and 30,010,998 shares outstanding
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
441,672
|
|
|
|
439,361
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 724,681 and 713,353 shares
|
|
|
(17,281
|
)
|
|
|
(16,996
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(32,240
|
)
|
|
|
(33,563
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
311,734
|
|
|
|
290,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
704,193
|
|
|
|
679,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
863,193
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
21,637
|
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Adjustment for non-cash items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,978
|
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
Asset and asset-related charges (income)
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(3,862
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
|
24,408
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(4,367
|
)
|
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(3,997
|
)
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
Other current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(4,256
|
)
|
|
|
(13,818
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
16,287
|
|
|
|
18,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
Sale of short-term investments
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(13,565
|
)
|
|
|
(45,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
31,792
|
|
|
|
(85,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock held in treasury
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
48,111
|
|
|
|
(63,380
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
56,216
|
|
|
|
284,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
104,327
|
|
|
$
|
221,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
For Sale
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
30,010,998
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
439,361
|
|
|
$
|
(16,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
290,097
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(39,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
$
|
679,206
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Unrecognized loss on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Benefit plan amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,960
|
|
Shares issued for directors compensation
|
|
|
16,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for restricted stock award plans
|
|
|
49,770
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
Treasury stock purchased at cost
|
|
|
(11,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Exercise of employee options
|
|
|
10,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Forefeiture of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
30,079,436
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
441,672
|
|
|
$
|
(17,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
311,734
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(38,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
$
|
704,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION:
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of
RTI International Metals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company or RTI) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations,
although the Company believes that the disclosures made are
adequate to make the information not misleading. In the opinion
of management, these financial statements contain all of the
adjustments of a normal and recurring nature considered
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods
presented. The results for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
year.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and notes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
financial statements. Although the Company believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be
read in conjunction with accounting policies and notes to
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a manufacturer of fabricated titanium
and specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. It is a
successor to entities that have been operating in the titanium
industry since 1951. The Company first became publicly traded on
the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the name RMI Titanium
Co. and the symbol RTI, and was reorganized into a
holding company structure in 1998 under the name RTI
International Metals, Inc.
The Company conducts business in three segments: the Titanium
Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With
operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; and Hermitage,
Pennsylvania; and a new facility under construction in
Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has overall
responsibility for the production of primary mill products
including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate.
In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro titanium alloys
for its steel-making customers. The Titanium Group also focuses
on the research and development of evolving technologies
relating to raw materials, melting and other production
processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace, defense, oil
and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas; Washington,
Missouri; Laval, Canada; and a representative office in China,
the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services
such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and
machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
5
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group is in close proximity to its wide
variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and
consumer customers.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products.
|
|
Note 3
|
ASSET AND
ASSET-RELATED CHARGES (INCOME):
|
In December 2009, the Company announced that it had indefinitely
delayed the construction of its premium-grade titanium sponge
production facility in Hamilton, Mississippi. The indefinite
delay was identified as a triggering event for an asset
impairment test. The Company reviewed the assets for
recoverability and determined the assets were impaired. At the
time, the Company had spent approximately $66.9 million
related to the construction of the facility and had additional
contractual commitments of approximately $7.8 million. The
Company determined the fair value of the assets to be
$5.8 million. As a result, the Company recorded an asset
and asset-related impairment charge of $68.9 million in
December 2009. These assets were not placed into service,
therefore no depreciation expense related to them had been
recognized. The $7.8 million of additional contractual
commitments was recorded within other accrued liabilities within
the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2009.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company recorded asset and asset-related charges (income)
totaling $(2.6) million and $(3.1) million,
respectively. These amounts were comprised of the favorable
settlement of several previously accrued contractual commitments
resulting in recognition of income totaling $5.9 million
and $6.4 million during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, including $1.9 million of
vendor refunds of which $1.0 million was received in cash
and $0.9 was recorded as a receivable at June 30, 2010.
Offsetting this income was a write-down of sponge-plant related
assets totaling $1.4 million during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, related to the
settlement of these contractual obligations as the
Companys contractors were able to return these assets to
their vendors for credit, thereby reducing the Companys
contractual liability. In addition, during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized
additional asset impairments totaling $1.9 million
reflecting the decrease in the expected future cash flows of the
sponge plant assets.
A summary of the status of the Companys accrual for
additional contractual commitments as of June 30, 2010, and
the activity for the six months then ended is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponge-Plant
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
7,809
|
|
Settlements/adjustments
|
|
|
(4,474
|
)
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 4
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Options
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options as
of June 30, 2010, and the activity during the six months
then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
475,581
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
99,580
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
563,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
345,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based
upon the assumptions noted in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
66.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock option
awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2010
was $12.99.
Restricted
Stock
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
restricted stock as of June 30, 2010, and the activity
during the six months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
171,387
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
66,533
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(73,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
164,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock grants was calculated using
the market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date
of issuance. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
restricted stock awards granted during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 was $25.73.
7
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Performance
Share Awards
A summary of the Companys performance share award activity
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Maximum Shares
|
|
Performance Share Awards
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Eligible to Receive
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
73,380
|
|
|
|
146,760
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
49,450
|
|
|
|
98,900
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
121,530
|
|
|
|
243,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the performance share awards granted was
estimated by the Company at the grant date using a Monte Carlo
model. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance
shares awarded during the six months ended June 30, 2010
was $38.79.
Management evaluates the estimated annual effective income tax
rate on a quarterly basis based on current and forecasted
business levels and activities, including the mix of domestic
and foreign results and enacted tax laws. This estimated annual
effective tax rate is updated quarterly based upon actual
results and updated operating forecasts. Items unrelated to
current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the
period identified as a discrete item of tax. The quarterly
income tax provision is comprised of tax on ordinary income at
the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted
for the effect of discrete items.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the estimated
annual effective tax rate applied to ordinary income was (52.1)%
compared to a rate of 83.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The negative effective tax rate is
principally the result of the mix of foreign and domestic
operating results and their relative tax rates. Although these
factors are present in both years, the level of expected annual
operating results in each period amplifies the rate impact and
determines its direction in such period, resulting in a negative
rate in 2010 and a positive rate in 2009. To the extent that
actual 2010 results for the Companys domestic and foreign
subsidiaries varies from the estimates applied at the end of the
most recent interim period, the actual provision for (benefit
from) income taxes could differ materially from the forecasted
amount used to estimated the tax provision for the six months
ended June 30, 2010.
Inclusive of discrete items, the Company recognized a benefit
from income taxes of $7,831, or (56.7)% of pretax income, and
$3,002, or 69.2% of the pretax loss, for federal, state, and
foreign income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The current
year-to-date
benefit is expected to reverse in the second half of 2010 based
on the Companys most recent forecast. Discrete items
totaling $638 increased the benefit from income taxes for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and were comprised of a
$1.6 million charge associated with the recently enacted
healthcare legislation with the remainder associated with
adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits due to the effective
settlement of an income tax examination and other immaterial
items. Discrete items totaling $610 reduced the benefit from
income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
were comprised primarily of adjustments to unrecognized tax
benefits based upon data that became public during the period.
8
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 6
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE:
|
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per
share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average of all potentially dilutive shares of Common
Stock that were outstanding during the periods presented.
Actual weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding used
in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,239
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
21,637
|
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,903,061
|
|
|
|
22,898,490
|
|
|
|
29,885,280
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
Effect of diluted securities
|
|
|
197,701
|
|
|
|
72,634
|
|
|
|
231,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
30,100,762
|
|
|
|
22,971,124
|
|
|
|
30,117,232
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, options
to purchase 276,603 and 261,727 shares of Common Stock, at
an average price of $46.61 and $47.82, respectively, have been
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share
because their effects were antidilutive. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, options to purchase 417,715 and
493,220 shares of Common Stock, at an average price of
$35.16 and $31.66, respectively, have been excluded from the
calculations of diluted earnings per share because their effects
were antidilutive.
Receivables are carried at net realizable value. Estimates are
made as to the Companys ability to collect outstanding
receivables, taking into consideration the amount, the
customers financial condition, and the age of the
receivable. The Company ascertains the net realizable value of
amounts owed and provides an allowance when collection becomes
doubtful. Receivables are expected to be collected in the normal
course of business and consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Trade and commercial customers
|
|
$
|
63,294
|
|
|
$
|
61,570
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
62,624
|
|
|
$
|
60,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 62% and
64% of the Companys inventories as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The remaining
inventories are valued at cost determined by a combination of
the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and weighted-average cost methods.
Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and
manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). When market
conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market
value, a
lower-of-cost-or-market
provision is recorded. Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
139,369
|
|
|
$
|
145,062
|
|
Work-in-process
and finished goods
|
|
|
194,285
|
|
|
|
197,840
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(64,321
|
)
|
|
|
(76,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
269,333
|
|
|
$
|
(266,887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the current
cost of inventories exceeded their carrying value by $64,321 and
$76,015, respectively. The Companys FIFO inventory value
is used to approximate current costs.
|
|
Note 9
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
The Company does not amortize goodwill; however, the carrying
amount of goodwill is tested, at least annually, for impairment.
Absent any events throughout the year which would indicate a
potential impairment has occurred, the Company performs its
annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter.
While there have been no impairments during 2010, uncertainties
or other factors that could result in a potential impairment in
future periods include continued long-term production delays or
a significant decrease in expected demand related to the Boeing
787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as any cancellation of one of the other major
aerospace programs the Company currently supplies, including the
Joint Strike Fighter program or the Airbus family of aircraft,
including the A380 and A350XWB programs. In addition, the
Companys ability to ramp up its production of these
programs in a cost efficient manner may also impact the results
of a future impairment test.
Goodwill. The carrying amount of goodwill
attributable to each segment at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
37,386
|
|
|
$
|
9,833
|
|
|
$
|
49,767
|
|
Accumulated impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
28,687
|
|
|
$
|
9,833
|
|
|
$
|
41,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles. Intangible assets consist of
customer relationships as a result of the Companys
previous acquisitions. These intangible assets, which were
valued at fair value, are being amortized over 20 years. In
the event that long-term demand or market conditions change and
the expected future cash flows associated with these assets is
reduced, a write-down or acceleration of the amortization period
may be required.
10
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
There were no intangible assets attributable to our Titanium
Group and Distribution Group at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2010. The carrying amount of intangible assets
attributable to our Fabrication Group at December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
$
|
14,299
|
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
13,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
10UNEARNED REVENUE:
The Company reported a liability for unearned revenue of $15,434
and $21,832 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. These amounts primarily represent payments
received in advance from commercial aerospace, defense, and
energy market customers on long-term orders, which the Company
has not recognized as revenues.
Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 was $233 and $855, respectively. Other income for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $366 and $1,754,
respectively. Other income consists primarily of foreign
exchange gains and losses from international operations and fair
value adjustments related to the Companys foreign currency
forward contracts. See Note 15 to the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on the Companys foreign currency forward
contracts.
|
|
Note 12
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS:
|
Components of net periodic pension and other post-retirement
benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 for those salaried and hourly covered employees
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
902
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(3,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Amortization of unrealized gains
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
$
|
918
|
|
|
$
|
2,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
2,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. In the Companys opinion, the ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from these matters will have no
significant effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Given the critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for
the Companys products, including specifically their use in
critical rotating parts of gas turbine engines, the Company
maintains aircraft products liability insurance of
$350 million, which includes grounding liability.
11
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Tronox
LLC Litigation
In connection with its now indefinitely delayed plans to
construct a premium-grade titanium sponge production facility in
Hamilton, Mississippi, in 2008, a subsidiary of the Company
entered into an agreement with Tronox LLC (Tronox)
for the long-term supply of titanium tetrachloride
(TiCl4), the primary raw material in the production
of titanium sponge. Tronox filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection in January 2009. On September 23, 2009, a
subsidiary of the Company filed a complaint in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against
Tronox challenging the validity of the supply agreement. Tronox
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, and on February 9,
2010 the Bankruptcy Court issued an order granting the motion.
The Companys subsidiary has appealed the order, as it
believes that its claims seeking termination
and/or
rescission of the supply agreement and companion ground lease on
grounds of breach of warranty, nondisclosure, mistake and breach
of duty of good faith and fair dealing are meritorious; however,
due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because of
the pending appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is
uncertain. Pending the outcome of this litigation, management
estimates that additional future contractual expenses could
range from zero to approximately $36 million.
Environmental
Matters
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations as
well as various health and safety laws and regulations that are
subject to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs
of compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. The Company
continues to evaluate its obligation for environmental-related
costs on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of the
Companys sites and the evolving nature of environmental
laws, regulations, and remediation techniques, the
Companys ultimate obligation for investigative and
remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is the Companys
policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, the Company accrues the amount it determines to be
the most likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, the Company believes that its
share of possible environmental-related costs is in a range from
$826 to $2,298 in the aggregate. At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1,458 and $1,546,
respectively. Of the total amount accrued at June 30, 2010,
$203 is expected to be paid out within the next twelve months,
and is included in the other accrued liabilities line of the
balance sheet. The remaining $1,255 is recorded in other
noncurrent liabilities. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, the Company made payments totaling $12 and
$90 related to its environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge the Company from its obligations.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
The Company maintained a program through an authorized agent to
recapture duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset
against exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by
the Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
12
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete this investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, the Company
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result, the
Company recorded charges totaling $10.5 million to Cost of
Sales through December 31, 2009. No additional charges were
recorded during the three or six months ended June 30, 2010.
These abovementioned charges represent the Companys
current best estimate of probable loss. Of this amount,
$9.5 million was recorded as a contingent current liability
and $1.0 million was recorded as a
write-off of
an outstanding receivable representing claims filed which had
not yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through
December 31, 2009, the Company repaid to U.S. Customs
$4.0 million for invalid claims. The Company made
additional repayments totaling $0.4 million and
$2.7 million during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. As a result of these payments,
the Companys liability totaled $2.8 million as of
June 30, 2010. While the Companys internal
investigation into these claims is complete, there is not a
timetable of which it is aware for when U.S. Customs will
conclude its investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, the Company believes there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of
additional amounts imposed for interest, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk of future loss
relates primarily to indirect duty drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs by several of the Companys customers as
the ultimate exporter of record in which the Company shared in a
portion of the revenue.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to potential penalties
imposed by U.S. Customs on these claims. In December 2009,
the Company received formal pre-penalty notices from
U.S. Customs imposing penalties in the amount of
$1.7 million. While the Company has the opportunity to
negotiate with U.S. Customs to potentially obtain relief of
these penalties, due to the inherent uncertainty of the penalty
process, the Company has accrued the full amount of the
penalties as of December 31, 2009. There was no change to
the amount accrued for penalties during the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company began filing new
duty drawback claims through a new authorized agent. Claims
filed through December 31, 2009 totaled $3.0 million.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company filed additional claims totaling $1.6 million and
$1.8 million, respectively. As a result of the open
investigation discussed above, the Company has not recognized
any credits to cost of sales upon the filing of these new
claims. The Company intends to record these credits when payment
is received from U.S. Customs until a consistent history of
receipts against claims filed has been established.
13
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Other
Matters
The Company is also the subject of, or a party to, a number of
other pending or threatened legal actions involving a variety of
matters incidental to its business. The Company is of the
opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the results of the operations,
cash flows, or the financial position of the Company.
|
|
Note 14
|
SEGMENT
REPORTING:
|
The Company has three reportable segments: the Titanium Group,
the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Groups products consist primarily of titanium
mill products and ferro titanium alloys. The mill products are
sold to a customer base consisting primarily of manufacturing
and fabrication companies in the supply chain for the commercial
aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer markets.
Customers include prime aircraft manufacturers and their family
of subcontractors including fabricators, forge shops, extruders,
casting producers, fastener manufacturers, machine shops, and
metal distribution companies. Titanium mill products are
semi-finished goods and usually represent the raw or starting
material for these customers who then form, fabricate, machine,
or further process the products into semi-finished and finished
parts.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical
process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and
consumer markets.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products. Intersegment sales are accounted for at prices that
are generally established by reference to similar transactions
with unaffiliated customers. Reportable segments are measured
based on segment operating income after an allocation of certain
corporate items such as general corporate overhead and expenses.
Assets of general corporate activities include unallocated cash
and deferred taxes.
14
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
A summary of financial information by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
30,556
|
|
|
$
|
27,124
|
|
|
$
|
69,397
|
|
|
$
|
57,427
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
35,278
|
|
|
|
47,056
|
|
|
|
69,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group net sales
|
|
|
53,847
|
|
|
|
62,402
|
|
|
|
116,453
|
|
|
|
126,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
37,295
|
|
|
|
26,487
|
|
|
|
65,897
|
|
|
|
52,551
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
14,669
|
|
|
|
14,210
|
|
|
|
27,431
|
|
|
|
28,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group net sales
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
|
|
40,697
|
|
|
|
93,328
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
38,800
|
|
|
|
50,743
|
|
|
|
79,242
|
|
|
|
100,430
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group net sales
|
|
|
39,617
|
|
|
|
51,331
|
|
|
|
80,523
|
|
|
|
101,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
38,777
|
|
|
|
50,076
|
|
|
|
75,768
|
|
|
|
98,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
106,651
|
|
|
$
|
104,354
|
|
|
$
|
214,536
|
|
|
$
|
210,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group before corporate allocations
|
|
$
|
3,854
|
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
$
|
20,937
|
|
|
$
|
11,475
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group operating income
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
16,824
|
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
(4,213
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(8,865
|
)
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,743
|
)
|
|
|
(2,222
|
)
|
|
|
(5,579
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group operating loss
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
(6,435
|
)
|
|
|
(6,057
|
)
|
|
|
(13,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
4,488
|
|
|
|
6,187
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(3,181
|
)
|
|
|
(3,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group operating income
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
|
$
|
(1,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,773
|
|
|
$
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
369,150
|
|
|
$
|
365,725
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
245,849
|
|
|
|
239,847
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
128,482
|
|
|
|
140,666
|
|
General corporate assets
|
|
|
119,712
|
|
|
|
108,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
863,193
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 15
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS:
|
When appropriate, the Company uses derivatives to manage its
exposure to changes in interest and exchange rates. The
Companys derivative financial instruments are recognized
on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges, to the extent the hedges are highly effective, are
recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax effects. The
ineffective portions of cash flow hedges, if any,
are recorded into current period earnings. Amounts recorded in
other comprehensive income are reclassified into current period
earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as
fair value hedges, along with corresponding changes
in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities, are
recorded in current period earnings.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company maintained several foreign
currency forward contracts, with notional amounts totaling
403, that are used to manage foreign currency exposure
related to equipment purchases associated with the
Companys ongoing capital expansion projects. These forward
contracts settle throughout 2010. These forward contracts have
not been designated as hedging instruments; therefore changes in
the fair value of these forward contracts are recorded in
current period earnings within other income (expense).
A summary of the Companys derivative instrument portfolio
as of June 30, 2010, is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
Financial Position
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
|
Hedging Instrument
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
The Company had no interest rate swaps as of December 31,
2009 or June 30, 2010.
|
|
Note 16
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
|
For certain of the Companys financial instruments and
account groupings, including cash, short-term investments,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued wages and other
employee costs, unearned revenue, other accrued liabilities, and
long-term debt, the carrying value approximates the fair value
of these instruments and groupings.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based upon assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering
such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes
the inputs utilized in measuring fair value as follows:
(Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted
prices in active markets that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data and which requires the Company
to develop its own assumptions. The hierarchy requires the
Company to use observable market data, when available, and to
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair
value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain
financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including its
cash equivalents.
The Companys cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
The Companys foreign currency forward contracts are
estimated utilizing the terms of the contracts and available
forward pricing information. However, because these derivative
contracts are unique and not actively traded, the fair values
are classified as Level 2 estimates.
16
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Listed below are the Companys assets and liabilities, and
their fair values, that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of June 30, 2010. There were no
transfers between levels for the six months ended June 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
104,327
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
104,327
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
20,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
124,479
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 the Company had no liabilities that
were measured on a non-recurring basis.
Listed below are the Companys assets, and their fair
values, that are measured and recorded on a non-recurring basis
as of June 30, 2010, and the losses recorded during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010 on those assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges for
|
|
|
Charges for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Sponge plant construction-related assets
|
|
$
|
2,433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,433
|
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company determined the fair value of its sponge
plant-related assets using Level 3 inputs. The fair values
of these assets were determined based upon quoted scrap metal
prices multiplied by the estimated weight of various metallic
components of the assets.
|
|
Note 17
|
CREDIT
AGREEMENT:
|
The Company maintains a $225 million revolving credit
facility under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) which matures on
September 27, 2012. The Company had no borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Agreement during the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement
bear interest at the option of the Company at a rate equal to
the London Interbank Offered Rate (the Libor Rate)
plus an applicable margin or a prime rate plus an applicable
margin. In addition, the Company pays a facility fee in
connection with the Credit Agreement. Both the applicable margin
and the facility fee vary based upon the Companys
consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the
Credit Agreement.
|
|
Note 18
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to
require new fair value measurement and classification
disclosures, and to clarify existing disclosures. The guidance
requires disclosures about transfers into and out of
Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, and separate
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
relating to Level 3 measurements. The guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2009, with the exception that the Level 3 activity
disclosure requirement
17
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
will be effective for interim periods for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of the revised
guidance did not have an effect on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
amending the disclosure requirements for events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued, eliminating the need to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The new guidance became
effective upon issuance of the guidance on February 24,
2010. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have a
material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
Note 19
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS:
|
On July 10, 2010, the Company entered into an amended and
restated long-term procurement frame contract with Airbus. Under
the terms of the contract, the Company has been selected as a
supplier for A350 seat track extrusions through 2020 and
has been awarded a five-year work package for A320 flap tracks.
Additionally, the Company had provided Airbus flexibility under
previously required volumes in 2010 and 2011 and accelerated the
move to a market share arrangement where the Company will
receive orders for a certain percentage of Airbus covered
mill products.
18
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
The following discussion should be read in connection with the
information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following
information contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, and is subject to the safe harbor created by that
Act. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by their
use of words like expects, anticipates,
intends, projects, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are based on
expectations and assumptions regarding future events. In
addition to factors discussed throughout this annual report, the
following factors and risks should also be considered,
including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
the future availability and prices of raw materials,
|
|
|
|
competition in the titanium industry,
|
|
|
|
demand for the Companys products,
|
|
|
|
the historic cyclicality of the titanium and commercial
aerospace industries,
|
|
|
|
changes in defense spending and cancellation or changes in
defense programs or initiatives,
|
|
|
|
changes in the Joint Strike Fighter production schedule,
|
|
|
|
the success of new market development,
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain access to financial markets and to
maintain current covenant requirements,
|
|
|
|
long-term supply agreements and the impact if another party
fails to fulfill their requirements under existing contracts or
successfully manage its future development and production
schedule,
|
|
|
|
the impact of the current titanium inventory overhang throughout
the Companys supply chain,
|
|
|
|
the impact of Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production delays,
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain key personnel,
|
|
|
|
legislative challenges to the Specialty Metals Clause of the
Berry Amendment,
|
|
|
|
labor matters,
|
|
|
|
global economic activities,
|
|
|
|
the outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation,
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of our expansion projects,
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on new business awards,
|
|
|
|
our order backlog and the conversion of that backlog into
revenue, and
|
|
|
|
other statements contained herein that are not historical facts.
|
Because such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risk
factors are set forth in this filing, as well as in other
filings filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) over the last 12 months,
copies of which are available from the SEC or may be obtained
upon request from the Company. Except as may be required by
applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our
forward-looking information.
Overview
RTI International Metals, Inc. (the Company,
RTI, we, us, or
our) is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a supplier of fabricated titanium and
specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With
operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; and Hermitage,
Pennsylvania; and the new facility under construction in
Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has overall
responsibility for the
19
production of primary mill products including, but not limited
to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate. In addition, the Titanium
Group produces ferro titanium alloys for its steel-making
customers. The Titanium Group also focuses on the research and
development of evolving technologies relating to raw materials,
melting and other production processes, and the application of
titanium in new markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical
process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and
consumer markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas;
Washington, Missouri; Laval, Canada; and a representative office
in China, the Fabrication Group provides value-added products
and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions,
fabricated and machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group services a wide variety of
commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer
customers.
Both the Fabrication and Distribution Groups access the Titanium
Group as their primary source of titanium mill products. For the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately
43% and 57%, respectively, of the Titanium Groups sales
were to the Fabrication and Distribution Groups. For the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 40% and
55%, respectively, of the Titanium Groups sales were to
the Fabrication and Distribution Groups.
Trends
and Uncertainties
Management believes that long-term demand indicators in the
titanium industry, driven largely by significant backlog in the
commercial aerospace market, remain strong as we move toward the
middle of the decade. Recently announced build rate increases by
Boeing and Airbus and a small increase in order activity in our
titanium mill product business support that belief.
On July 20, 2010, we entered into an amended and restated
long-term procurement frame contract with Airbus. Under the
terms of the contract, we have been selected as a supplier for
A350 seat track extrusions through 2020 and have been
awarded a five year work package for A320 flap tracks.
Additionally, we have provided Airbus flexibility under
previously required volumes in 2010 and 2011 and accelerated the
move to a market share arrangement to 2012 where we will receive
orders for a certain percentage of Airbus covered mill
products.
The effects of the cyclicality of the commercial aerospace
market are still negatively impacting spot market demand and
capacity utilization. Both the Boeing and Airbus supply chains
continue to have relatively high inventories created by slower
than anticipated production levels over the past two years. We
do not expect this inventory overhang to dissipate until at
least the end of 2011. That imbalance, together with the
recently announced production schedule push out on the F-35, is
contributing to significant near-term uncertainty until
production levels increase.
20
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared To Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
106.7
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of 36% in shipments, offset by a 27% decrease in the
average realized selling prices of prime mill products to our
trade customers, resulted in a $0.2 million reduction in
the Titanium Groups net sales. The decrease in average
realized selling prices was primarily due to the continued high
proportion of sales under long-term agreements with lower
contract pricing versus the comparable period in the prior year.
Offsetting these impacts was a strengthening in ferro-alloy
demand from the specialty steel industry which resulted in a
$3.7 million increase in net sales.
The increase in Fabrication Groups net sales was
principally the result of a $5.7 million increase in sales
to our energy market customers related to engineered components
to support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico, as well as a $5.9 million increase in commercial
aerospace sales primarily driven by the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program. These sales increases were partially offset by
declines in military programs such as the F-22 and C-17.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the continued
slowdown in the commercial aerospace market which has resulted
in higher levels of titanium inventory throughout the supply
chain. The combination of lower demand and lower realized
pricing for the Distribution Groups titanium products
resulted in a $13.1 million reduction in net sales. This
decrease was slightly offset by an increase of $1.1 in net sales
of the groups specialty alloys products which was mostly
due to increased volume.
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit (loss) for
our reportable segments for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(42.6
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
607.7
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.3 million charge in the prior year period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, gross profit for the
Titanium Group decreased $5.2 million compared to the prior
year. Lower average realized selling prices reduced gross profit
by $8.4 million. Further, the Titanium Groups gross
profit was unfavorably impacted by $0.3 million due to
lower sales of Titanium Group-sourced inventory by our
Fabrication and Distribution Group businesses. These decreases
were partially offset by a higher margin sales mix which
increased gross profit by $3.0 million. Additionally, gross
profit at the Titanium Group was favorably impacted
$0.7 million due to higher ferro-alloy demand.
21
The increase in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by the completion of several engineered components for
our energy market customers to support the containment of the
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and higher commercial aerospace
volume, increasing gross profit by $7.9 million. In
addition, corrective actions taken to improve manufacturing
efficiencies allowed us to achieve higher margins on our energy
market projects in the current period.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
average realized selling prices that exceeded our decline in
product cost.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses (SG&A) for our reportable segments for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.8 million increase in SG&A was primarily
related to a $2.8 million increase in salaries and benefits
in the current year compared to the prior year, partially offset
by a reduction of $0.4 million in professional and
consulting expenses. SG&A expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 included the reversal of
$2.2 million of incentive compensation accruals as a result
of our decision to eliminate incentive compensation in 2009 in
response to the challenging market conditions which existed at
the time.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses were $1.0 million and
$0.5 million for the three month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This spending
reflects our continued focus on productivity and quality
enhancements to our operations.
Asset and Asset-Related Charges
(Income). Asset and asset-related charges
(income) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were
($2.6) million. Asset and asset-related charges (income)
consist of favorable settlements related to the Companys
accrued contractual commitments at the Companys
indefinitely delayed sponge plant which were offset in part due
to the write-down of sponge-plant-related assets related to
these settlements as our contractors were able to return these
assets to their vendors for refunds.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
87.5
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(59.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
231.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.3 million charge in the prior year period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, operating income
decreased $2.6 million for the Titanium Group compared to
the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower
gross profit due to lower realized selling prices, partially
offset by a reduction in SG&A costs.
The reduced operating loss for the Fabrication Group was
primarily the result of the completion of several engineered
components for our energy market customers to support the
containment of the oil spill in
22
the Gulf of Mexico and higher volume on value-added fabricated
parts. These increases were partially offset by higher
production costs and SG&A expenses during the year as we
continue to ramp up the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program.
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in the titanium and other specialty
metals markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased realized
selling prices that exceeded our decline in product cost.
Other Income. Other income for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0.2 million
and $0.9 million, respectively. Other income consists
primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from our
international operations and fair value adjustments related to
our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
was $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The
decrease in interest income was principally related to lower
returns on invested cash, as well as lower overall cash
balances, compared to the prior year period. Interest expense
was $0.3 million and $2.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily attributable to the decrease in
our long-term debt compared to the prior year as a result of the
payoff of our $225 million term loan in September 2009.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the estimated annual
effective tax rate applied to ordinary income was (52.1)%
compared to a rate of 83.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The negative effective tax rate is
principally the result of the mix of foreign and domestic
operating results and their relative tax rates. Although these
factors are present in both years, the level of expected annual
operating results in each period amplifies the rate impact and
determines its direction in such period, resulting in a negative
rate in 2010 and a positive rate in 2009. To the extent that
actual 2010 results for our domestic and foreign subsidiaries
varies from the estimates applied at the end of the most recent
interim period, the actual provision for (benefit from) income
taxes could differ materially from the forecasted amount used to
estimated the tax provision for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
Inclusive of discrete items, we recognized a benefit from income
taxes of $8.1 million, or (372.3)% of pretax income, and
$2.8 million, or 104.7% of the pretax loss, for federal,
state, and foreign income taxes for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The current
year-to-date
benefit is expected to reverse in the second half of 2010 based
on our most recent forecast. Discrete items recognized during
each of the three months periods were immaterial.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared To Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
69.4
|
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
(21.2
|
)
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
214.5
|
|
|
$
|
210.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million related to the resolution of
Airbus 2009 contractual obligations, the Titanium
Groups net sales decreased $3.4 million. For our
prime mill products, a 25% decrease in average realized selling
prices, partially offset by a 14% increase in shipments,
resulted in an $8.5 million reduction in the Titanium
Groups net sales. The decrease in average realized selling
prices was primarily due to the continued high proportion of
sales under long-term agreements with lower contract pricing
versus the comparable period in the prior year. Partially
offsetting these impacts was an increase in ferro-alloy demand
from the specialty steel industry which resulted in a
$5.1 million increase in net sales.
23
Excluding the $4.2 million of nonrecurring engineering
funds received related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program that were previously paid by the customer, the
Fabrication Groups net sales increased $9.1 million
compared to the prior year. The nonrecurring engineering funds
were received to offset certain agreed upon tooling expenses to
support the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program. A corresponding amount was recorded in cost of sales
during the current period. The increase in net sales was
primarily the result of the ramp up in deliveries related to the
Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program, as well as an increase in deliveries related to
other Boeing programs, which have increased net sales
$7.1 million. In addition, we have completed several
engineered components for our energy market customers in support
of the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico
resulting in a $5.7 million increase in net sales compared
to the prior year. These increases were partially offset by
decreases in sales supporting various military aircraft programs.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the continued
slowdown in the commercial aerospace market which has resulted
in higher levels of titanium inventory throughout the supply
chain. The combination of lower demand and lower realized
pricing for the Distribution Groups titanium products
resulted in a $21.9 million reduction in net sales,
partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in net sales
for the Groups specialty alloys products, mostly due to
increased volume.
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit (loss) for
our reportable segments for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
419.2
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
44.5
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million related to the resolution of
Airbus 2009 contractual obligations and the
$2.5 million charge in the prior year associated with the
U.S. Customs investigation of our previously filed duty
drawback claims, the Titanium Groups gross profit
decreased $11.2 million. The decrease in the Titanium
Groups gross profit was the result of lower sales levels
of prime products reducing gross profit by $2.2 million and
lower average realized selling prices reducing gross profit by
$15.2 million. Additionally, gross profit at the Titanium
Group was unfavorably impacted $0.2 million due to lower
sales of Titanium Group-sourced inventory by our Fabrication and
Distribution Group businesses. Partially offsetting these
decreases, gross profit was favorably impacted by
$4.3 million due to a higher margin sales mix and
$2.1 million due to higher ferro-alloy demand.
The increase in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by the completion of several engineered components to
support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico
and higher commercial aerospace volume, increasing gross profit
by $9.0 million. In addition, corrective actions taken to
improve manufacturing efficiencies allowed us to achieve higher
margins on our energy market projects in the current period.
These increases were partially offset by incremental ramp up
costs as we increase production related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
average realized selling prices that exceeded our decline in
product cost.
24
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A for our reportable segments
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
32.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in SG&A was primarily related to a
$1.9 million increase in salaries and benefits in the
current year compared to the prior year partially offset by a
$0.9 million reduction in professional and consulting
expenses. SG&A expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 included the reversal of $2.2 million of
incentive compensation accruals as a result of our decision to
eliminate incentive compensation in 2009 in response to the
challenging market conditions which existed at the time.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses were $1.8 million and
$1.0 million for the six month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. This spending reflects our
continued focus on productivity and quality enhancements to our
operations.
Asset and Asset-Related Charges
(Income). Asset and asset-related charges
(income) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were
($3.1) million. Asset and asset-related charges (income)
consist of favorable settlements related to the Companys
accrued contractual commitments at the Companys
indefinitely delayed sponge plant which were offset in part due
to the write-down of sponge-plant-related assets related to
these settlements as our contractors were able to return these
assets to their vendors for refunds.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
166.7
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(36.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
675.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million related to the resolution of
Airbus 2009 contractual obligations and the
$2.5 million charge in the prior year associated with the
U.S. Customs investigation of our previously filed duty
drawback claims, operating income decreased $7.4 million
for the Titanium Group compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily attributable to lower gross profit due to lower
volume and realized selling prices, partially offset by a
reduction in SG&A costs.
The reduced operating loss for the Fabrication Group was the
result of the completion of several engineered components for
our energy market customers to support the containment of the
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and higher volume on value-added
fabricated parts. These increases were partially offset by
higher production costs and SG&A expenses during the year
as we continue to ramp up the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program.
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in the titanium market. The lower
demand resulted in decreased realized selling prices that
exceeded our decline in
25
product cost. This decrease was partially offset by a decrease
in compensation-related expenses and other cost management
actions.
Other Income. Other income for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0.4 million and
$1.8 million, respectively. Other income consists primarily
of foreign exchange gains and losses from our international
operations and fair value adjustments related to our foreign
currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The
decrease was principally related to lower returns on invested
cash, as well as lower overall cash balances, compared to the
prior year period. Interest expense was $0.6 million and
$4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was
primarily attributable to the decrease in our long-term debt
compared to the prior year as a result of the payoff of our
$225 million term loan in September 2009.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the estimated annual
effective tax rate applied to ordinary income was (52.1)%
compared to a rate of 83.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The negative effective tax rate is
principally the result of the mix of foreign and domestic
operating results and their relative tax rates. Although these
factors are present in both years, the level of expected annual
operating results in each period amplifies the rate impact and
determines its direction in such period, resulting in a negative
rate in 2010 and a positive rate in 2009. To the extent that
actual 2010 results for our domestic and foreign subsidiaries
varies from the estimates applied at the end of the most recent
interim period, the actual provision for (benefit from) income
taxes could differ materially from the forecasted amount used to
estimated the tax provision for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
Inclusive of discrete items, we recognized a benefit from income
taxes of $7.8 million, or (56.7)% of pretax income, and
$3.0 million, or 69.2% of the pretax loss, for federal,
state, and foreign income taxes for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The current
year-to-date
benefit is expected to reverse in the second half of 2010 based
on our most recent forecast. Discrete items totaling
$0.6 million increased the benefit from income taxes for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and were comprised of a
$1.6 million charge associated with the recently enacted
healthcare legislation with the remainder associated with
adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits due to the effective
settlement of an income tax examination and other immaterial
items. Discrete items totaling $0.6 million reduced the
benefit from income taxes for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and were comprised primarily of adjustments to unrecognized
tax benefits based upon data that became public during the
period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
In connection with our long-term supply agreements for the Joint
Strike Fighter (JSF) program and the Airbus family
of commercial aircraft, including the A380 and A350XWB programs,
we are constructing a new titanium forging and rolling facility
in Martinsville, Virginia, and new melting facilities in Canton
and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated capital spending of
approximately $140 million. The Niles melting facility is
substantially complete, whereas we have capital spending of
approximately $6 million remaining on the Canton melting
facility and expect it will begin operations in 2011. We have
capital expenditures of approximately $60 million remaining
related to the Martinsville, Virginia facility and anticipate
that it will begin production in 2012. We expect this facility
to enable us to enhance our throughput and shorten our lead
times on certain products, primarily titanium sheet and plate.
We continually evaluate market conditions as we move forward
with these capital projects to ensure our operational
capabilities are matched to our anticipated demand.
We maintain a $225 million revolving credit facility under
our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement) which matures on September 27, 2012. We
had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement during
the six months ended June 30, 2010. Borrowings under the
Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal
to the London Interbank Offered Rate (the Libor
Rate) plus an applicable margin or a prime rate plus an
applicable margin. In addition, we pay a facility fee in
connection with the Credit Agreement. Both the applicable margin
and the facility fee vary based upon our consolidated net debt
to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement.
26
The Credit Agreement financial covenants and rates are described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Our leverage ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated
EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was (2.7) at
June 30, 2010. If this ratio were to exceed 3.25 to 1, we
would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our ability
to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
|
|
|
Our interest coverage ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to
Net Interest, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was 167.1 at
June 30, 2010. If this ratio were to fall below 2.0 to 1,
we would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our
ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, allows
for adjustments related to unusual gains and losses, certain
noncash items, and certain non-recurring charges. Based on our
Consolidated EBITDA for the twelve months ended June 30,
2010, we could borrow up to $72 million plus any additional
amount that may be available as a result of our Net Debt
position (as defined in the Credit Agreement). At June 30,
2010, we were in compliance with our financial covenants under
the Credit Agreement.
While our current financial forecasts indicate we will maintain
our compliance with these covenants, certain events, some of
which are beyond our control, including further long-term delays
in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
or JSF production schedule, or deeper reductions in global
aircraft demand, may cause us to be in default of one or more of
the covenants in the future. In the event of a default under our
Credit Agreement, absent a waiver from our lenders or an
amendment to our Credit Agreement, the interest rate on the
Credit Agreement could increase materially. Such a development
could have a material adverse impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements if we were to borrow under the Credit
Agreement. In addition, a failure to maintain our financial
covenants may impair our ability to borrow under our Credit
Agreement. If we default or anticipate an expected future
default under one or more of our covenants, we will need to
renegotiate our Credit Agreement, seek other sources of
liquidity, or both.
Provided we continue to meet our financial covenants under the
Credit Agreement, we expect that our cash and cash equivalents
of $104.3 million, short-term investments of
$20.2 million, and our undrawn $225 million revolving
credit facility will provide us sufficient liquidity to meet our
operating needs and current capital expansion plans.
Cash provided by operating activities. Cash
provided by operating activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $16.3 million and
$19.0 million, respectively. This decrease in cash provided
by operating activities was primarily due to increased cash used
for working capital purposes, primarily due to increases in
inventory and accounts receivable and a decrease in accounts
payable.
Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities. Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
was $31.8 million and $(85.2) million, respectively.
The increase in cash provided by (used in) investing activities
is principally related to the sale of $45 million in
short-term investments and a significant decrease in our capital
expenditures compared to the same period in the prior year as we
have slowed the pace of construction at our Martinsville,
Virginia rolling facility to match market conditions.
Cash provided by financing activities. Cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $0.1 million and
$0.9 million, respectively. This decrease was primarily due
to no borrowings on our credit facility during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $1.2 million in
borrowings during the same period in the prior year.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
We maintained a program through an authorized agent to recapture
duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset against
exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by the
Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to cost of sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31,
27
2007, the Company recognized a reduction to cost of sales
totaling $14.5 million associated with the recapture of
duty paid. This amount represents the total of all claims filed
by the agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, we
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result, we
recorded charges totaling $10.5 million to cost of sales
through December 31, 2009. No additional charges were
recorded during the three and six months ended June 30,
2010.
These abovementioned charges represent our current best estimate
of probable loss. Of this amount, $9.5 million was recorded
as a contingent current liability and $1.0 million was
recorded as a write-off of an outstanding receivable
representing claims filed which had not yet been paid by
U.S. Customs. Through December 31, 2009, we had repaid
to U.S. Customs $4.0 million for invalid claims. We
made additional repayments totaling $0.4 million and
$2.7 million during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. As a result of these payments,
the Companys liability totaled $2.8 million as of
June 30, 2010. While our internal investigation into these
claims is complete, there is not a timetable of which we are
aware for when U.S. Customs will conclude its investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, we believe there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of
additional amounts imposed for interest, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk of future loss
relates primarily to indirect duty drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs by several of our customers as the ultimate
exporter of record in which we shared in a portion of the
revenue.
Additionally, we are exposed to potential penalties imposed by
U.S. Customs on these claims. In December 2009, we received
formal pre-penalty notices from U.S. Customs imposing
penalties in the amount of $1.7 million. While we have the
opportunity to negotiate with U.S. Customs to potentially
obtain relief of these penalties, due to the inherent
uncertainty of the penalty process, we have accrued the full
amount of the penalty as of December 31, 2009. There was no
change to the amount accrued for penalties during the six months
ended June 30, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we began filing new duty
drawback claims through a new authorized agent. Claims filed
through December 31, 2009 totaled $3.0 million. During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we filed
additional claims totaling $1.6 million and
$1.8 million, respectively. As a result of the open
investigation discussed above, we have not recognized any
credits to cost of sales upon the filing of these new claims. We
intend to record these credits when payment is received from
U.S. Customs until a consistent history of receipts against
claims filed has been established.
Backlog
The Companys order backlog for all markets was
approximately $288 million as of June 30, 2010, as
compared to $342 million at December 31, 2009. Of the
backlog at June 30, 2010, approximately $157 million
is likely to be realized over the remainder of 2010. We define
backlog as firm business scheduled for release into our
production process for a specific delivery date. We have
numerous contracts that extend multiple years, including the
Airbus, JSF and Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
long-term supply agreements, which are not included in backlog
until a specific release into production or a firm delivery date
has been established.
28
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as
various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject
to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs of
compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. We continue
to evaluate our obligation for environmental-related costs on a
quarterly basis and make adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of our sites and
the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and
remediation techniques, our ultimate obligation for
investigative and remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is
our policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, we accrue the amount we determine to be the most
likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, we believe our share of possible
environmental-related costs is in a range from $0.8 million
to $2.3 million in the aggregate. At both June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount accrued for future
environmental-related costs was $1.5 million. Of the total
amount accrued at June 30, 2010, $0.2 million is
expected to be paid out within the next twelve months and is
included in the other accrued liabilities line of the balance
sheet. The remaining $1.3 million recorded in other
noncurrent liabilities. During the six months ended
June 30, 2010, we made payments totaling $0.1 million
related to our environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge us from our obligations for these sites, which include
the Ashtabula River.
New
Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued authoritative guidance to require new
fair value measurement and classification disclosures, and to
clarify existing disclosures. The guidance requires disclosures
about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair
value hierarchy, and separate disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3
measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the
exception that the Level 3 activity disclosure requirement
will be effective for interim periods for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of the revised
guidance did not have an effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
amending the disclosure requirements for events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued eliminating the need to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The new guidance became
effective upon issuance of the guidance on February 24,
2010. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have an
effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market
risk from the information provided in Item 7A. Quantitative
Disclosures about Market Risk on our
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 22, 2010.
29
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
As of June 30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30,
2010 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
30
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
you should carefully consider the factors discussed in
Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2010,
which could materially affect our business, financial condition,
financial results, or future performance. Reference is made to
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements of this report which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
The Company may repurchase shares of Common Stock under the RTI
International Metals, Inc. share repurchase program approved by
the Companys Board of Directors on April 30, 1999.
The repurchase program authorizes the repurchase of up to
$15 million of RTI Common Stock. No shares were purchased
under the program during the three months ended June 30,
2010. At June 30, 2010, approximately $3 million of
the $15 million remained available for repurchase. There is
no expiration date specified for the share repurchase program.
In addition to the share repurchase program, employees may
surrender shares to the Company to pay tax liabilities
associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards under the
2004 Stock Plan. The number of shares of Common Stock
surrendered to satisfy tax liabilities for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were 11,328 and
226 shares, respectively.
The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed herewith
and incorporated herein by reference.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC.
William T. Hull
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting officer)
Dated: August 4, 2010
32
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Employment agreement, dated May 17, 2010, between the
Company and James L. McCarley, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
for the event dated May 17, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
for the event dated May 17, 2010.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan, contract or
arrangement. |
33