e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended: September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to _______.
Commission file number: 1-34033
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1532464 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(952) 912-3444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated
filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last
business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $262,852,499
based on a closing price of $10.64 per common share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
(formerly the NASDAQ National Market).
Shares of common stock outstanding as of November 23, 2010: 25,107,340
INDEX
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following table shows, except as otherwise noted, the location of information required in this
Form 10-K, in our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended September 30, 2010 and Proxy
Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for January 20, 2011. All such
information set forth below under the heading Page/Reference is incorporated herein by reference,
or included in this Form 10-K on the pages indicated.
2
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term
is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
The words believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will, expect, plan,
project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions, which are
predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters,
identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on information available to us as
of the time of such statements and relate to, among other things, expectations of the business
environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the
market and statements regarding our mission and vision. Forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Our future operating results and performance trends may be affected by a number of factors,
including, without limitation, those described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K. Those
risk factors, and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified from time to time in our
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q and our registration statements, could cause our actual future results to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors
set forth in our various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and of changes in
general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates and changes in the
assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.
The terms we, our or us mean Digi International Inc. and all of the subsidiaries included in
the consolidated financial statements unless the context indicates otherwise.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Digi International Inc. was formed in 1985 as a Minnesota corporation and reorganized as a Delaware
corporation in 1989 in conjunction with its initial public offering. Our common stock is traded on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol DGII. With our global headquarters in Minnetonka,
Minnesota, and regional sales offices throughout North America, Europe and Asia, our products are
available through approximately 280 distributors located in approximately 70 countries. We also
have engineering locations in North America, Europe and India.
Our first products (sold under the DigiBoard® brand) were box and board-level serial port adapters
that were used to directly connect multiple peripherals, such as standalone computer terminals, to
personal computers or a host computer system. During the 1990s, Ethernet became the connectivity
infrastructure for businesses and over time it has been extended into factories, retail stores,
restaurants, hospitals and many other environments. During the same period, the semiconductor
industry was also in a phase of rapid advancement. Complete systems were being built on a single
integrated circuit (chip). As part of a box or board level product, these chips could be used to
build a network interface for virtually any device for which network connectivity was required.
Recognizing the developing opportunities for device connectivity, we implemented a strategy in
early 2000 to leverage the brand strength that we had established with the DigiBoard product line
by organically
4
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
COMPANY OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
developing or acquiring next-generation connectivity products and technologies that would extend
the value of the Digi brand into an array of device networking applications.
During the course of the past several years, we augmented our strategy with an increased emphasis
on developing wireless device connectivity solutions. In fiscal 2007, we launched our Drop-in
Networking initiative which provides end-to-end wireless access to electronic devices in places
where wires will not work or cannot be used. Drop-in Networking enables our customers to
differentiate their products, provide better customer service and frequently create new revenue
streams. Our Drop-in Networking initiative provides opportunities for us in the next wave of
Internet growth. The initial wave was focused on connecting people, first with personal computers
and then with cell phones, PDAs and other related consumer devices. This next wave focuses on
connecting devices and machines. We believe that the Internet will support billions of new devices
in the next several years. We are ideally positioned to take full advantage of the second wave of
Internet growth with our Drop-in Networking Solutions that will provide significant market
expansion in what is now being referred to in the market as wireless machine to machine (M2M)
connectivity.
M2M communication works by connecting communication hardware to a physical asset so that
information about its status and performance can be sent to a computer system and used to automate
a business process or a human action so that a person does not have to do it manually. By
incorporating products from both our embedded and non-embedded categories, our Drop-In Networking
Solutions are making it easy for customers to effectively drop-in a wireless M2M solution.
In fiscal 2009, we expanded on our Drop-in Networking initiative and introduced the iDigi® M2M
network operating platform. This Platform as a Service (PaaS) quickly and easily connects remote
assets to a customers business applications. The iDigi® platform also includes a control center
application (iDigi Manager Pro) which enables easy provisioning, maintenance and management of the
devices themselves as well as the associated connectivity. The iDigi® platform runs on a grid of
Digi-managed servers. As an on-demand model, customers pay only for services consumed, conserving
capital and requiring minimal infrastructure to operate.
With our breadth of products, services and management software, as well as partnerships with
leading device manufacturers and application providers, we are now able to offer complete Digi
Solution bundles end-to-end, fully customizable, industry-specific solutions that can be
deployed with unprecedented speed. Digi Energy, Digi Tank and Digi Fleet, the first Digi solution
offerings, provide scalable, real-time monitoring and management capabilities that have previously
not been available.
Digi Energy Digi Energy was launched as the first Digi solution bundle, targeting the Smart Grid
efforts of energy services providers. Creating a Smart Grid using new levels of monitoring and
control to improve the efficiency, security and reliability of the grid is a major focus in the
world today.
In 2010, we extended our Digi Energy offering and introduced Digi X-Grid solutions, which provide
connectivity, control and support of all devices in the Extended Grid. The Extended Grid
comprises devices that exist beyond the meter in homes and businesses. It is only by leveraging
these devices and thereby enabling end users of energy to be actively engaged with energy producers
that we can recognize the full benefits of the Smart Grid. We provide provisioning tools, Smart
Energy profile certified products (e.g., gateways, modules), the iDigi® platform and other
services; our partners provide devices such as meters and in-home displays, plus application
integration. Together with our partners, we are making the Extended Grid a reality, with over
30,000 gateways deployed in Residential Energy Management solutions today and over 100,000 under
contract.
5
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
COMPANY OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Digi Tank Our second Digi solution bundle is optimized for remote tank monitoring of storage
tanks containing liquids, solids and gases. Tank monitoring can reduce supply chain costs and
insure tank-stored inputs to a production process are available and of necessary quality. Digi
Tank solutions include our wired and wireless communication gateways, ZigBee modules and ZigBee
adapters; the iDigi® platform, which provides management, messaging and storage services to connect
remote assets and enterprise applications; iDigi® Device Integration Application (iDigi® Dia)
device connection software; a growing list of wireless sensor partners; iDigi® application
partners, with ready-to-implement tank management applications; and Digi Professional Services for
device and solution design, deployment planning, integration and optimization.
Digi Fleet Digi Fleet is the third Digi solution bundle. Comprised of our rugged mobile
gateways with support for Wi-Fi, cellular, ZigBee and satellite technologies, as well as the iDigi®
platform and Digi Professional Services, Digi Fleet solutions provide tracking, monitoring and
management of large numbers of high-value mobile assets. These solutions improve efficiency,
reduce costs and meet government regulations for connecting and monitoring tractors, trailers and
containers.
We continue to leverage a common core technology base to develop and provide innovative
connectivity solutions to our customers. Core technology is used across product lines to provide
additional functionality for customers, allowing them to get to market with network-enabled devices
faster. We have positioned ourselves in the growing market of integrated hardware and software
connectivity solutions to network-enable the coming generation of intelligent devices in business
applications. Our Drop-in Networking products and iDigi® brand are enabling us to pivot our
business from point products to solutions. We have strategic goals for the next three to five
years to change our revenue mix to be 60% wireless, 60% international, and at least 15% services.
We believe we are making progress towards these goals by increasing our investment in wireless
products, expanding internationally, and providing full solutions which include product and
services offerings to our customers.
PRODUCTS
Our products are divided into two categories: embedded and non-embedded. An embedded product is
incorporated by a product developer into an electronic device (e.g., utility meter, environmental
sensors, retail scanner, and medical instruments) to provide processing power and wired or wireless
network connectivity to that device. Additional hardware and/or software development is required
on the part of the customer when using an embedded product as the product usually is an integrated
internal part of the device.
A non-embedded product is connected externally to a device or larger system (e.g., retail checkout,
building access control panel, traffic controller) to provide network connectivity or port
expansion. Non-embedded products generally do not require additional hardware development and can
often be used right out of the box, although they do provide an environment for adding custom
software as well. These products provide an economical way to network-enable previously deployed
devices, allowing companies to utilize the latest technologies without the cost of replacing
existing equipment.
Embedded Networking Products
Modules Developing a device around a chip or microprocessor involves a high level of complexity.
A module is a group of components that are set up to work together, eliminating much of that
complexity. An embedded module may provide somewhat less flexibility than a chip, but is much
easier to implement into a product design. A number of these modules can be directly connected to
iDigi®, enabling remote management and remote application connectivity.
6
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
Our modules can be divided into two categories: processor modules and communications modules.
Processor modules provide customers with a networked platform for use as the main processor in an
embedded system and the flexibility to add in custom features and functionality, as this ensures a
quick time to market development cycle for a network-enabled device. These modules are targeted as
the core processors for products such as access control systems, Smart Energy devices,
Point-of-Sale (POS) systems, Radio Frequency ID (RFID) readers, medical devices and instrumentation
and networked displays. Communication modules are ideal for network-enabling and web-enabling a
device. They enable customers who wish to easily accommodate both wired and wireless functionality
in one product design. These modules make it very easy to add most any type of connectivity,
especially wireless connectivity. Typically with a communication module, there is another
processor performing the central processing. Adding wired or wireless network communication to a
device allows companies to manage that device over a network or via the Internet.
Chips A chip (or microprocessor) provides the brains and processing power of an intelligent
electronic device or communication sub-system. Some of our higher volume customers choose to
purchase chips and build their own products. Chips are low cost but require the highest level of
development expertise. Building a solution from the chip level offers a low cost of the end
design, but the level of complexity in product development can increase risk and prolong time to
market.
Our chips are the building blocks for many of our embedded and non-embedded products. By using our
own microprocessors we can ensure complete hardware/software compatibility for product designs. In
addition this allows us to guarantee long-term availability to our module customers. This is a
significant advantage since many of these products are expected to be in use for five to ten years
once they are developed.
Software and Development Tools Coupled with the chips and modules are a variety of development
tools and associated software to make application development easy. We provide software and tools
for a variety of operating environments and developer skill sets. These include Linux® and
Microsoft® Windows® Embedded CE as well as our own Net+OS, Dynamic C and Python based iDigi® Dia.
Single Board Computers Single-board computers (SBCs) are complete systems on a single circuit
board. They are essentially a programmable box product without the enclosure everything is on
the board and ready to be embedded into a larger system. They offer the same benefits as the
processor modules, but eliminate the need for additional interface circuitry because they include
all of the key device interface components on one circuit board.
Satellite Our acquisition of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited (MobiApps) in June 2009 added
satellite communication products that provide worldwide satellite data transmit/receive
capabilities for customers involved in satellite-based tracking and industrial remote
communications. Operating over the ORBCOMM low-earth orbit satellite network, these products can
significantly improve asset utilization by allowing clients to monitor, track and manage their
fixed and mobile assets around the world.
Non-Embedded Networking Products
Cellular Routers Cellular routers provide connectivity for devices over a cellular data network.
They can be used as a cost effective alternative to landlines for primary or backup connectivity
for hard to reach sites and devices. We introduced the first intelligent high-speed cellular
router in 2005 to address the growing need for customers to connect remote sites and devices.
These products have been certified by the major wireless providers in North America and abroad,
including AT&T®, Verizon Wireless®, Sprint®, Bell Mobility and Rogers. All of our cellular
products include a unique remote management platform that provides secure
7
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
management of devices across remote networks. In addition, application connectivity, management
and customization is enabled via the iDigi® platform for many of these products.
Gateways A gateway aggregates local wireless data traffic and transports it over a cellular or
other Internet Protocol (IP)-based network, usually back to a central application or database. Our
gateway products, part of our Drop-in Networking solution, enable devices or groups of devices to
be networked in locations where there is no existing network or where access to a network is
prohibited. These gateways can work in conjunction with our wireless adapters and wireless
embedded modules to enable customers to monitor and manage remote devices in a non-intrusive and
economical way. All of our gateway products are linked with iDigi® for secure management of
devices across remote networks, application connectivity and customization.
Wireless Communication Adapters Our wireless communication adapters are small box products that
utilize a variety of wireless protocols for PC-to-device or device-to-device connectivity, often in
locations where deploying a wired network is not possible either because of cost, disruption or
impracticality. By supporting ZigBee®, Wi-Fi® and proprietary RF technologies, we can meet most
customer application requirements, such as serial cable replacement, Ethernet cable replacement,
mesh networking, low cost/low power remote monitoring, simple I/O control functions, environmental
sensors and long distance connectivity. In conjunction with one of our gateways, wireless
communication adapters plug into iDigi® for remote management, application connectivity and
customization.
Serial Servers Serial Servers (also known as device servers and terminal servers) add wired or
wireless network connectivity to a serial device. They transfer data between a serial port and an
Ethernet network, turning a previously isolated device with a serial port into a fully
collaborative network component. We believe that serial servers will remain an important product
category as Ethernet based serial connections continue to extend beyond their current applications
into many new markets such as building automation, healthcare, process control, and secure console
port management on servers, routers, switches and other network equipment. Many of our serial
servers can also leverage iDigi® for application connectivity, remote management and customization.
Console Servers Console servers, or console management servers, provide access to the serial
ports of network equipment such as servers, routers or switches. Our intelligent console servers
enable customers to access, monitor or manage their network devices across multiple sites, both
remotely over the network or via their console ports even during network outages. These console
servers provide advanced auditing and logging capabilities that complement regulatory compliance
efforts such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
USB Connected Products The Universal Serial Bus (USB) is a plug-and-play interface between a
computer and peripheral devices. In recent years, many serial ports on PCs have been replaced with
USB ports, due in large part to the usability and cost effectiveness of USB devices. We have one
of the most comprehensive and advanced USB port expansion product lines in the industry. Our
USB-to-serial converters enable customers to expand a single USB port into multiple serial ports to
connect legacy peripheral devices. The product line also includes USB hubs that add additional USB
or powered USB ports, which are often used in retail environments, and a network-enabled hub that
connects USB devices over an IP network, which is an industry first.
Serial Cards A serial card plugs into the expansion slot of a computer to provide serial ports
for device connectivity. We are a global leader in this category and offer one of the most
extensive serial card product families. Our products support a wide range of operating systems,
port densities, bus types, expansion options
8
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
and applications. As Ethernet connections extend beyond current applications, the serial card
products are gradually transitioning to network-attached and/or USB-attached devices. We have
strengthened our product offering to meet customer needs and fully support this mature product line
while working to seamlessly transition customers to newer technologies.
SERVICES
We also provide a variety of services to complement our products. Our services are included under
our embedded product grouping as they are not material to our consolidated financial statements.
iDigi® iDigi® is an M2M network operating platform, used by software developers and
organizations responsible for supporting the network. iDigi® is used to connect enterprise
applications to remote devices.
Digi m-Trak The Digi m-Trak mobile asset tracking solution provides reliable, cost-effective
fleet monitoring and management. Combining GPS technology and wireless communication with an
easy-to-use web-based management application, the Digi m-Trak system ensures constant, on-demand
access to fleet information at any time, from any place. Digi m-Trak is only available in India,
and parts of the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia.
Engineering Design Services Through our subsidiary, Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum),
we offer engineering design services to customers that are challenged with their wireless
development projects. Our specialized engineers have extensive experience in wireless technologies
such as Global System for Mobile communication (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Global
Positioning System (GPS), Wi-Fi and proprietary radio frequency (RF) as well as Application
Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) design, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) integration,
embedded software and complete turn-key product development which allows them to address virtually
any wireless development need.
APPLICATION MARKETS
We believe we are a worldwide leader in commercial grade device connectivity, through
network-enabling devices in stores, factories, office buildings, banks, gas stations, oil rigs,
hospitals, and many other vertical environments. We are heavily focused on four application
markets and we offer solution bundles as described above for energy, tank and fleet.
Smart Energy Our products, including Digi X-Grid solutions, simplify and accelerate the
integration of energy management systems with remote energy assets. These energy management
systems are necessary for Smart Grid initiatives encompassing both energy distribution and energy
consumption management. Migrating to IP-based network communications can be a challenge for
utility companies, due to compatibility issues between field equipment and the applications used
with them. Our products enable companies to network-enable existing products in the field without
replacing hardware or rewriting existing application software and are used in Automated Meter
Reading (AMR), Automated Meter Intelligence (AMI), Energy Management Services, Distribution
Automation and other smart energy applications.
Tank Monitoring/Management Our wireless Tank Monitoring/Management solutions help companies more
efficiently integrate, manage and monitor remotely deployed tanks of liquids, solids and gases. We
offer end-to-end, fully customizable wireless hardware, a software platform and services that can
be used to create and deploy secure, highly scalable and flexible tank monitoring solutions with
unprecedented speed.
9
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
APPLICATION MARKETS (CONTINUED)
Fleet Management Some of our newest products have extended our network connectivity expertise
into Fleet Management. Using a combination of cellular, satellite, Wi-Fi and ZigBee wireless
connectivity, these solutions provide improved operating efficiency and asset management. We
provide equipment and applications for connecting and tracking commercial vehicles, primarily
focused on long-haul trucking, but extending to other areas of public and private fleets, including
taxis, public transit, emergency service vehicles, heavy equipment and others. Applications also
include container/traffic tracking, stolen vehicle recovery, and recording driver behavior metrics.
Medical/Healthcare We provide a way to network-enable medical equipment and devices to receive,
monitor and access patient information quickly, easily, and accurately, utilizing the hospitals
existing Ethernet or wireless network to improve patient care and reduce operating costs.
In addition, we have a long history of successful deployments in other application markets,
including Remote Device Management, Building Automation/Security, Traffic Management, Industrial
Automation, Retail/Point-of-Sale (POS), Data Center Management, Digital Signage, and Government.
ACQUISITIONS
We have made several acquisitions in the past five fiscal years that are consistent with our
corporate strategy.
|
|
|
In July 2006, we acquired MaxStream®, Inc. (MaxStream), a leader in the wireless device
networking market. MaxStream supplies device manufacturers and integrators with reliable
wireless modules and box products that are easy to use and allow customers to wirelessly
monitor and control electronic devices. Typical applications include automated utility
meter reading, oil and gas monitoring, remote control and monitoring of commercial heating
and air conditioning systems, vehicle information access for fleet management, industrial
controls, wireless sensors, and electronic signals. MaxStream was also a pioneer in the
field of ZigBee®/802.15.4 wireless communications. The MaxStream acquisition significantly
expanded our wireless offering both with embedded modules and non-embedded wireless
communications adapters. The products also play a key role in our Drop-in Networking
initiative. Effective October 1, 2007, MaxStream merged into Digi International Inc. |
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), a leader in the European
wireless router market. Sarian designs, develops and manufactures advanced
wireless/cellular IP-based routing equipment for mission critical applications. Sarian
developed its own comprehensive IP-based operating system and software and can offer
customers technical excellence, flexibility and rapid customization. Sarian has a strong
customer base in ATM connectivity, retail and payment systems connectivity, remote
monitoring telemetry, lottery terminal connectivity and wireless backup of wired broadband
connections. Effective October 1, 2009, Sarian merged into Digi International (UK) Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
In July 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), a leading design
services organization. Spectrum is a wholly owned subsidiary of Digi International Inc.
Spectrum focuses on solving a customers wireless development challenges. Spectrums
engineers have extensive experience in wireless technologies such as GSM, CDMA, GPS, Wi-Fi
and proprietary RF as well as ASIC design, FPGA integration, embedded software and complete
turn-key product development which allows them to address virtually any wireless
development need. |
10
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
In June 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private
Limited (MobiApps), a developer of M2M communications technology focusing on satellite,
cellular and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has locations in India,
Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreements, Digi
International acquired the U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In addition, we
established Digi Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India Private Limited,
which acquired the assets of MobiApps affiliate companies, located in Singapore and India,
respectively. MobiApps provides a new generation of products based on its own custom
designed and patented mixed signal ASIC, which dramatically reduces the complexity and
improves performance of satellite M2M system solutions. Satellite M2M applications include
fleet management, marine vessel tracking, container tracking, agricultural monitoring,
energy management, and remote field service applications. Satellite is especially suited to
applications that cross country and continental boundaries, providing connectivity in very
remote locations, and providing mission critical wireless backup solutions when cellular
coverage is insufficient. MobiApps also has cellular and hybrid cellular/satellite products
packaged with various asset tracking management services, including vehicle tracking, taxi
dispatch and employee tracking, focused on markets in India and Southeast Asia. |
Our products are sold under the Digi, Rabbit, iDigi®, Digi m-Trak and Spectrum brands. We believe
the Digi and Rabbit brands have established strong identities with our targeted customer base and
we believe our customers associate the Digi brand with reliability and the Rabbit brand with
ease of integration. Many of our customers choose us because they are building a very complex
system solution and they want the highest level in product reliability. In the core module and
semiconductor application environments, ease of integration is a powerful brand identity.
DISTRIBUTION AND PARTNERSHIPS
We sell our products through a global network of distributors, systems integrators, value added
resellers (VARs) and to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
Our larger distributors include Tech Data Corporation, Arrow Electronics, Inc./NuHorizons, Ingram
Micro, Synnex, Future Electronics, Miel, Atlantik Elektronik GmbH, B&B Electronics Manufacturing
and Express Systems & Peripherals. We also maintain relationships with many other distributors in
the U.S., Canada, Europe, Asia and Latin America. Additionally, we maintain strong relationships
with catalog distributors CDW, Insight, Digi-Key and Mouser Electronics.
We maintain strategic alliances with other industry leaders to develop and market technology
solutions. These include most major communications hardware and software vendors, operating system
suppliers, computer hardware manufacturers, cellular carriers and Smart Grid vendors. Key partners
include: Microsoft, VMware, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Dell, Toshiba, Atmel, Ember, Freescale,
Qualcomm, Sierra Wireless, Ericsson, Itron, AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Bell Mobility, Rogers and
several other cellular carriers worldwide. Furthermore, we maintain a worldwide network of
authorized developers that extends our reach into certain other technology applications and
geographical regions. With our MobiApps acquisition, we are now partnering with ORBCOMM Inc.
MobiApps satellite communication products utilize ORBCOMM Inc.s low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite
network to monitor, track and manage customers fixed and mobile assets around the world.
Our customer base includes many of the worlds largest companies. We have strategic sales
relationships with leading vendors, allowing them to ship our products and services as component
parts of their overall solutions. These vendors include IBM, Comverge, Xata, Itron and Gilbarco,
among others. Many of the worlds leading
11
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
DISTRIBUTION AND PARTNERSHIPS (CONTINUED)
telecommunications companies and Internet service providers also rely on our products, including
Alcatel-Lucent, AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and Siemens.
No customer comprised more than 10% of our net sales for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008.
We compete in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological
advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product
introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the
basis of existing and planned product features, service capabilities, company reputation, brand
recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product
development capabilities, price and availability. While we have no competitors that carry a
comparable range of products, we do have various competitors based on specific products.
We are a leader in device networking for business, developing reliable products and technologies to
connect and securely manage local or remote electronic devices over the network, via the Internet,
or via satellite. Our enterprise solutions include embedded or non-embedded products or
combinations of these products.
OPERATIONS
Our operations are conducted through a combination of internal manufacturing and external
subcontractors specializing in various parts of the manufacturing process. We rely on third party
foundries for our semiconductor devices (ASICs). This approach is beneficial because it allows us
to reduce our fixed costs, maintain production flexibility and optimize our profits.
Our products are manufactured to our designs with standard and semi-custom components. Most of
these components are available from multiple vendors. We have several single-sourced supplier
relationships, either because alternative sources are not available or because the relationship is
advantageous to us. If these suppliers are unable to provide a timely and reliable supply of
components, we could experience manufacturing delays that could adversely affect our consolidated
results of operations.
SEASONALITY
In general, our business is not considered to be highly seasonal, although our first fiscal quarter
revenue is often less than other quarters due to holidays and fewer shipping days.
WORKING CAPITAL
We fund our business operations through a combination of cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities and cash generated from operations. We believe that these current financial resources,
cash generated from operations, and our capacity for debt and/or equity financing will be
sufficient to fund our business operations for the next twelve months and beyond.
RESEARCH AND PATENTS
During fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, our research and development expenditures were $27.8
million, $26.4 million and $27.1 million, respectively. From time to time, we have customers that
pay for us to develop highly customizable products and we charge them fair market value for the
services performed. Due to rapidly
12
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
RESEARCH AND PATENTS (CONTINUED)
changing technology in the communications technology industry, we believe that our success depends
primarily upon the product development skills of our personnel, and the ability to integrate
acquired technologies with organically developed technologies. We have incurred in-process
research and development charges in connection with our past acquisitions, which were expensed upon
consummation of the acquisitions. Effective October 1, 2009 in-process research and development
costs are capitalized according to new authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) related to business combinations. Such acquired in-process research and
development charges will be disclosed separately and will be incremental to the research and
development expenditures disclosed above. We have not yet incurred any capitalized in-process
research and development.
Our proprietary rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks,
trade secrets and patents. We have established common law and registered trademark rights on a
family of marks for a number of our products. Our patents are applicable to specific technologies
and currently are valid for varying periods of time based on the date of patent application or
patent grant in the U.S. and the legal term of patents in the various foreign countries where
patent protection is obtained. We believe our intellectual property has significant value and is
an important factor in the marketing of our company and products.
BACKLOG
Backlog as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $26.8 million and $13.6 million, respectively. Most
of the backlog at September 30, 2010 is expected to be shipped in fiscal 2011. Our backlog
increase as of September 30, 2010 as compared to September 30, 2009 is primarily due to an
improvement in domestic economic conditions and an increase in wireless customer orders. Backlog
as of any particular date is not necessarily indicative of our future sales trends.
EMPLOYEES
We had 648 employees on September 30, 2010.
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Our customers are located throughout North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA), Asia and
Latin America. We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions
being denominated in Euros, British Pounds and Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk
as the financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce
foreign currency risk.
During 2010, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $27.6 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro
and British Pound. During 2009 and 2008, we had approximately $75.2 million and $76.1 million,
respectively, of net sales to foreign customers including export sales, of which $33.4 million and
$45.7 million, respectively, were denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro and
British Pound in fiscal 2009 and predominantly the Euro in fiscal 2008. In future periods, a
significant portion of sales will continue to be made in Euros and British Pounds. Financial
information about geographic areas appears in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
this Form 10-K.
13
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL WEBSITE
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Proxy Statements, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current
Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available through our website
(www.digi.com) under the About us Investor Relations caption or by writing to us.
This information is available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports can
also be accessed via the SEC website, www.sec.gov, or via the SECs Public Reference Room
located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information concerning the operation of the
SECs Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
We are not including the information on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference
into, our Form 10-K.
Multiple risk factors exist which could have a material effect on our operations, results of
operations, profitability, financial position, liquidity, capital resources and common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our dependence on new product development and the rapid technological change that characterizes our
industry makes us susceptible to loss of market share resulting from competitors product
introductions and similar risks.
The communications technology industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving
industry standards, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles and rapidly
changing customer requirements. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the
emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. Our
future success will depend on our ability to enhance our existing products, to introduce new
products to meet changing customer requirements and emerging technologies, and to demonstrate the
performance advantages and cost-effectiveness of our products over competing products. Failure by
us to modify our products to support new alternative technologies or failure to achieve widespread
customer acceptance of such modified products could cause us to lose market share and cause our
revenues to decline.
We may experience delays in developing and marketing product enhancements or new products that
respond to technological change, evolving industry standards and changing customer requirements.
There can be no assurance that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the
successful development, introduction, and marketing of these products or product enhancements, or
that our new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the
marketplace and achieve any significant or sustainable degree of market acceptance in existing or
additional markets. In addition, the future introductions or announcements of products by us or
one of our competitors embodying new technologies or changes in industry standards or customer
requirements could render our then-existing products obsolete or unmarketable. There can be no
assurance that the introduction or announcement of new product offerings by us or one or more of
our competitors will not cause customers to defer their purchase of our existing products, which
could cause our revenues to decline.
14
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to our research and development, which, if
not successful, could cause a decline in our revenues and harm our business.
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to research and development in the coming
years to enhance and develop additional products. For the fiscal years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008,
our research and development expenses comprised 15.2%, 15.9% and 14.6%, respectively, of our net
sales. If we are unable to develop new products as a result of our research and development
efforts, or if the products we develop are not successful, our business could be harmed. Even if
we develop new products that are accepted by our target markets, the net revenues from these
products may not be sufficient to justify our investment in research and development.
Many of our products have been developed through a combination of internally developed technologies
and acquired technologies. Our ability to continue to develop new products is partially dependent
on finding and acquiring new technologies in the marketplace. Even if we identify new technologies
that we believe would be complementary to our internally developed technologies, we may not be
successful in acquiring those technologies or we may not be able to acquire the technologies at a
price that is acceptable to us.
A substantial portion of our recent development efforts have been directed toward the development
of new products targeted to manufacturers of intelligent, network-enabled devices and other
embedded systems in various markets, including markets in which networking solutions for embedded
systems have not historically been sold, such as markets for industrial automation equipment,
security equipment and medical equipment. Our financial performance is dependent upon the
development of the intelligent device markets that we are targeting, the increasing adoption of
wireless technologies by these markets and our ability to successfully compete and sell our
products to manufacturers of these intelligent devices.
Certain of our products are sold into mature markets, which could limit our ability to continue to
generate revenue from these products.
Certain of our products provide asynchronous and synchronous data transmissions via add-on cards.
The market for add-on asynchronous and synchronous data communications cards is mature. As the
overall market for these products decreases due to the adoption of new technologies, we expect that
our revenues from these products will continue to decline. As a result, our future prospects
depend in part on our ability to acquire or develop and successfully market additional products
that address growth markets.
Our failure to effectively manage product transitions could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and profitability.
From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products, capabilities, or technologies
that may replace or shorten the life cycles of our existing products. Announcements of currently
planned or other new products may cause customers to defer or stop purchasing our products until
new products become available. Furthermore, the introduction of new or enhanced products requires
us to manage the transition from older product inventories and ensure that adequate supplies of new
products can be delivered to meet customer demand. Our failure to effectively manage transitions
from older products could result in inventory obsolescence and have a material adverse effect on
our revenues and profitability.
15
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Our failure to compete successfully in our highly competitive market could result in reduced prices
and loss of market share.
The market in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological advances and evolving
industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product introductions and
marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the basis of existing
and planned product features, company reputation, brand recognition, technical support,
relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product development capabilities, price, and
availability. Certain of our competitors and potential competitors may have greater financial,
technological, manufacturing, marketing, and personnel resources than us. Present and future
competitors may be able to identify new markets and develop products more quickly, which are
superior to those developed by us. They may also adapt new technologies faster, devote greater
resources to research and development, promote products more aggressively, and price products more
competitively than us. There are no assurances that competition will not intensify or that we will
be able to compete effectively in the markets in which we compete.
Our inability to obtain the appropriate telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications or
approvals from other governmental regulatory bodies could impede our ability to grow revenues in
our wireless products.
The sale of our wireless products in certain geographical markets is sometimes dependent on the
ability to gain telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications and/or approvals by certain
governmental bodies. Failure to obtain these approvals, or delays in receiving the approvals,
could impact our ability to enter our targeted markets or to compete effectively or at all in these
markets and could have an adverse impact on our revenues.
Our entry into a services and solutions model, using cloud-based services, presents execution and
competitive risks.
We are deploying a services and solutions model using our own internally developed hosted services
and cloud-based platform, software, and supporting products. We are employing significant human
and financial resources to develop and deploy this cloud-based platform and strategies. While we
believe our wireless, device networking and connectivity expertise, investments in infrastructure,
and our innovative environment provide us with a strong foundation to compete, it is uncertain
whether our strategies will attract the users or generate the revenue required to be successful.
Whether we are successful in this new business model depends on our execution in a number of areas,
including:
|
|
|
our ability to quickly and effectively put in place the infrastructure to deploy our
solution; |
|
|
|
|
competing effectively in our targeted application markets, including energy, tank
monitoring, fleet management and medical; and |
|
|
|
|
deploying complete end-to-end solutions that accelerate our customers time to market. |
We are dependent on wireless communication networks owned and controlled by others.
Our revenues could decline if we are unable to deliver continued access to satellite and digital
cellular wireless carriers that we depend on to provide sufficient network capacity, reliability
and security to our customers. Our financial condition could be impacted if our wireless carriers
were to increase the prices of their services, or to suffer operational or technical failures.
16
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
The cyclicality of the semiconductor industry may result in substantial period-to-period
fluctuations in operating results.
Our semiconductor products provide networking capabilities for intelligent, network-enabled devices
and other embedded systems. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and subject to rapid
technological change and has been subject to significant economic downturns at various times,
characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices and
production overcapacity. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand
and production capacity constraints. As a result, we may experience substantial period-to-period
fluctuations in operating results due to general semiconductor industry conditions.
Loss of one or more of our large customers could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
Our sales are primarily made on the basis of purchase orders rather than under long-term
agreements, and therefore, any customer could cease purchasing our products at any time without
penalty. The decision of any large customer, including our distributors, to cease using our
products or a material decline in the number of units purchased by such a customer could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues.
The long and variable sales cycle for certain of our products makes it more difficult for us to
predict our operating results and manage our business.
The sale of our products typically involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of
capital and other resources by potential customers and end users, as well as delays frequently
associated with end users internal procedures to deploy new technologies within their products and
to test and accept new technologies. For these and other reasons, the sales cycle associated with
certain of our products is typically lengthy and is subject to a number of significant risks,
including end users internal purchasing reviews, that are beyond our control. Because of the
lengthy sales cycle and the large size of certain customer orders, if orders forecasted for a
specific customer are not realized or delayed, our operating results could be materially adversely
affected.
We depend on manufacturing relationships and on limited-source suppliers, and any disruptions in
these relationships may cause damage to our customer relationships.
We procure all parts and certain services involved in the production of our products and
subcontract most of our product manufacturing to outside firms that specialize in such services.
Although most of the components of our products are available from multiple vendors, we have
several single-source supplier relationships, either because alternative sources are not available
or because the relationship is advantageous to us. There can be no assurance that our suppliers
will be able to meet our future requirements for products and components in a timely fashion. In
addition, the availability of many of these components to us is dependent in part on our ability to
provide our suppliers with accurate forecasts of our future requirements. Delays or lost sales
could be caused by other factors beyond our control, including late deliveries by vendors of
components. If we are required to identify alternative suppliers for any of our required
components, qualification and pre-production periods could be lengthy and may cause an increase in
component costs and delays in providing products to customers. Any extended interruption in the
supply of any of the key components currently obtained from limited sources could disrupt our
operations and have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships and profitability.
17
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Our use of suppliers in Southeast Asia involves risks that could negatively impact us.
We purchase printed circuit boards from suppliers in Southeast Asia. Product delivery times may be
extended due to the distances involved, requiring more lead time in ordering. In addition, ocean
freight delays may occur as a result of labor problems, weather delays or expediting and customs
issues. Any extended delay in receipt of the component parts could eliminate anticipated cost
savings and have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships and profitability.
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property
rights.
Our ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary rights and technology. Our proprietary
rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and
patents.
We enter into confidentiality agreements with all employees, and sometimes with our customers and
potential customers, and limit access to the distribution of our proprietary information. There
can be no assurance that the steps taken by us in this regard will be adequate to prevent the
misappropriation of our technology. Our pending patent applications may be denied and any patents,
once issued, may be circumvented by our competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that
others will not develop technologies that are superior to our technologies. Despite our efforts to
protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or
to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States.
There can be no assurance that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States
or abroad will be adequate or that competing companies will not independently develop similar
technology. Our failure to adequately protect our proprietary rights could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and result in loss of revenue.
From time to time, we are subject to claims and litigation regarding intellectual property rights
or other claims, which could seriously harm us and require us to incur significant costs.
The communications technology industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we receive notification of a third-party
claim that our products infringe other intellectual property rights. Any litigation to determine
the validity of third-party infringement claims, whether or not determined in our favor or settled
by us, may be costly and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel
from productive tasks, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our
business and service the needs of our customers. There can be no assurance that any infringement
claims by third parties, if proven to have merit, will not materially adversely affect our business
or financial condition. In the event of an adverse ruling in any such matter, we may be required
to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, discontinue
the use of certain processes or be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property
rights of the third party claiming infringement. There can be no assurance that a license would be
available on reasonable terms or at all. Any limitations on our ability to market our products, or
delays and costs associated with redesigning our products or payments of license fees to third
parties, or any failure by us to develop or license a substitute technology on commercially
reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
18
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
We face risks associated with our international operations and expansion that could impair our
ability to grow our revenues abroad.
We believe that our future growth is dependent in part upon our ability to increase sales in
international markets. These sales are subject to a variety of risks, including fluctuations in
currency exchange rates, tariffs, import restrictions and other trade barriers, unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, potentially adverse tax
consequences, and export license requirements. In addition, we are subject to the risks inherent
in conducting business internationally, including political and economic instability and unexpected
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. There can be no assurance that one or more of these
factors will not have a material adverse effect on our business strategy and financial condition.
The loss of key personnel could prevent us from executing our business strategy.
Our business and prospects depend to a significant degree upon the continuing contributions of our
executive officers and our key technical personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining qualified
personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could result in our failure to execute our
business strategy.
Any acquisitions we have made or will make could disrupt our business and seriously harm our
financial condition.
We will continue to consider acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies.
In the event of any future purchases, we could issue stock that would dilute our current
stockholders percentage ownership, incur debt, assume liabilities, or incur large and immediate
write-offs.
Our operation of any acquired business may also involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
problems combining the purchased operations, technologies, or products;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated costs; |
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core business;
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating businesses in different countries and cultures; |
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organization. |
We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products,
technologies, or personnel that we have acquired or that we might acquire in the future and any
failure to do so could disrupt our
business and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations. Moreover, from time to time, we may enter into negotiations for a proposed
acquisition, but be unable or unwilling to consummate the acquisition under consideration. This
could cause significant diversion of managements attention and out-of-pocket expenses for us. We
could also be exposed to litigation as a result of an unconsummated acquisition, including claims
that we failed to negotiate in good faith or misappropriated confidential information.
Unanticipated changes in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be favorably or unfavorably affected by unanticipated changes
in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or our interpretation of such
laws. In addition, we may be subject to the
19
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other U.S. and
international tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes resulting from these
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no
assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have an effect on our operating
results and consolidated financial condition.
Our failure to effectively comply with the requirements of applicable environmental legislation and
regulation could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Production and marketing of products in certain states and countries may subject us to
environmental and other regulations. In addition, certain states and countries may pass new
regulations requiring our products to meet certain requirements to use environmentally friendly
components. The European Union has issued two directives relating to chemical substances in
electronic products. The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE) makes
producers of certain electrical and electronic equipment financially responsible for collection,
reuse, recycling, treatment and disposal of equipment placed in the European Union market after
August 13, 2005. The Restrictions of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) bans the use of certain
hazardous materials in electric and electrical equipment which are put on the market in the
European Union after July 1, 2006. In the future, China and other countries including the United
States are expected to adopt further environmental compliance programs. If we fail to comply with
these regulations, we may not be able to sell our products in jurisdictions where these regulations
apply, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Our failure to effectively comply with regulatory laws pertaining to our foreign operations could
have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
We are required to comply with U.S. government export regulations in the sale of our products to
foreign customers, including requirements to properly classify and screen our products against a
denied parties list prior to shipment. We are also required to comply with the provisions of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and all other anti-corruption laws of all other countries in
which we do business, directly or indirectly, including compliance with the anti-bribery
prohibitions and the accounting and recordkeeping requirements of this law. Violations of the FCPA
could trigger sanctions, including ineligibility for U.S. government insurance and financing, as
well as large fines. Failure to comply with the aforementioned regulations could also deter us
from selling our products in international jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse
effect on our revenues and profitability.
Negative conditions in the global credit markets may impair a portion of our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio consists of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. These marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried
at fair market value. Some of our investments could experience reduced liquidity, resulting in an
adjustment and could result in an impairment charge should the impairment be considered as
other-than-temporary. This loss would be recorded in our consolidated statement of operations,
which could materially adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
Our consolidated operating results and financial condition may be adversely impacted by worldwide
economic conditions and credit tightening.
If worldwide economic conditions experience a significant downturn, these conditions may make it
difficult or impossible for our customers and suppliers to accurately forecast and plan future
business activities, which may cause them to slow or suspend spending on products and services.
Our customers may find it difficult to gain sufficient credit in a timely manner, which could
result in an impairment of their ability to place orders with us
20
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
or to make timely payments to us for previous purchases. If this occurs, our revenue may be
reduced, thereby having a negative impact on our results of operations. In addition, we may be
forced to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts and our days sales outstanding may increase,
which would have a negative impact on our cash position, liquidity and financial condition. We
cannot predict the timing or the duration of an economic downturn in the economy.
We may have additional tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions. Significant
judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes, including our
reserves for uncertain tax positions. In the ordinary course of business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We regularly are
under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions
and accruals. The results of an audit could have a material effect on our financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
If our stock price declines, we may need to recognize an impairment of our goodwill.
If the price of our common stock declines, we could have an impairment of our goodwill. Our value
is dependent upon continued future growth in demand for our products and solutions. If such growth
does not materialize or our forecasts are significantly reduced, we may impair our goodwill. We
perform our annual goodwill impairment assessment on our one reporting unit at June 30 each year.
The price of our common stock has been volatile and could continue to fluctuate in the future.
The market price of our common stock, like that of many other high-technology companies, has
fluctuated significantly and is likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. During fiscal year
2010, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market ranged from $7.19 to
$12.30 per share. Our closing sale price on November 23, 2010 was $9.68 per share. Announcements
by us or others regarding the receipt of customer orders, quarterly variations in operating
results, acquisitions or divestitures, additional equity or debt financings, results of customer
field trials, scientific discoveries, technological innovations, litigation, product developments,
patent or proprietary rights, government regulation and general market conditions may have a
significant impact on the market price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents have an
anti-takeover effect.
There exist certain mechanisms under the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents
that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control. For instance, under Delaware law, we are
prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with interested stockholders for a period
of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder unless certain requirements are met, and majority stockholder approval is required for
certain business combination transactions with interested parties.
Our Certificate of Incorporation contains a fair price provision requiring majority stockholder
approval for certain business combination transactions with interested parties, and this provision
may not be changed without the vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock.
Other mechanisms in our charter documents may also delay, defer or prevent a change of control.
For instance, our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors has authority
to issue series of our preferred stock with such voting rights
21
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
and other powers as the Board of Directors may determine. Furthermore, we have a classified board
of directors, which means that our directors are divided into three classes that are elected to
three-year terms on a staggered basis. Since the three-year terms of each class overlap the terms
of the other classes of directors, the entire board of directors cannot be replaced in any one
year. Under Delaware law, directors serving on a classified board may not be removed by
shareholders except for cause. Also, pursuant to the terms of our shareholder rights plan, each
outstanding share of common stock has one attached right. The rights will cause substantial
dilution of the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by
the Board of Directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts. The effect
of these anti-takeover provisions may be to deter business combination transactions not approved by
our Board of Directors, including acquisitions that may offer a premium over the market price to
some or all stockholders.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
22
The following table contains a listing of our current property locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership or |
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
Lease |
Location of |
|
|
|
Square |
|
Expiration |
Property |
|
Use of Facility |
|
Footage |
|
Date |
|
Minnetonka, MN
|
|
Research & development, sales, sales support,
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
Owned |
(Corporate headquarters)
|
|
marketing and administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eden Prairie, MN
|
|
Manufacturing and warehousing
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
Engineering services
|
|
|
16,837 |
|
|
November 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waltham, MA
|
|
Research & development, sales and sales support
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
October 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing
and administration
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
March 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis, CA
|
|
Sales, sales support, research & development
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindon, UT
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development
and administration
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
December 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herndon, VA
|
|
Sales, marketing and tech support
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
October 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong Kong, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
November 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dortmund, Germany
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing and
administration
|
|
|
21,485 |
|
|
March 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breisach, Germany
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development,
manufacturing,
warehousing and administration
|
|
|
8,748 |
|
|
July 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuilly sur Seine, France
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
January 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ilkley, UK
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing and administration
|
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
October 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logrono, Spain
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
January 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
November 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
July 2014 |
In addition to the above locations, we perform research and development activities in various
other locations in the United States and sales activities in various other locations in Europe and
Asia which are not deemed to be principal locations and which are not listed above. We believe
that our facilities are adequate for our needs. In February 2008, we sold our facility in
Dortmund, Germany and leased back approximately 40% of the property for a period of five years,
with a renewal option for an additional five years.
23
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired Net Silicon, Inc. on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a
defendant along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in
NetSilicons IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO
prospectus and registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained
material misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters
in allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the
claims against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation
vigorously. Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed
from the lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
As previously disclosed, the parties advised the District Court on February 25, 2009 that they had
reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of
settlement was filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court
preliminarily approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a
settlement fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the
proposed settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued
an order granting final approval to the settlement. Several objectors have since appealed the
order approving the settlement, and those appeals remain pending.
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our deductible of $250,000. While there can be no
guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our liability
insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the applicable
deductible amount of $250,000 per claim. As of September 30, 2010, we have an accrued liability
for the anticipated settlement of $300,000 which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of
loss that is probable and a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000, which
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less our $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, such losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
On June 18, 2010 and June 24, 2010, respectively, two shareholders filed derivative actions against
our directors, our former Chief Financial Officer, and another executive officer, in the Hennepin
County District Court, State of Minnesota, in Minneapolis. Digi also was named as a nominal
defendant in the actions. The complaints alleged that the individual defendants caused us to
operate in countries with dubious business practices without having internal controls or an
accounting system that were adequate to ensure that we did not violate the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. The complaints alleged causes of action against the individual defendants for (1)
breach of fiduciary duty, (2) waste of corporate assets, and (3) unjust enrichment. The complaints
sought to recover, purportedly on our behalf, unspecified damages, equitable relief, attorneys
fees, and costs of litigation. On August 2, 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss these lawsuits. On
August 16, 2010, the derivative actions were dismissed without prejudice.
Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On May 11, 2010, SIPCO, LLC filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Digi in federal court in
the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuit included allegations against Digi and five other
companies pertaining to the infringement of SIPCOs patents by wireless mesh networking products.
The lawsuit seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter
at this time or whether it will have a materially adverse impact on our business prospects and our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
24
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED) |
In addition to the matters discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Stock Listing
Our Common Stock trades under the symbol DGII. Since July 3, 2006, our Common Stock has traded on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market tier of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and prior to that time was
traded on the NASDAQ National Market tier. On November 23, 2010, the number of holders of our
Common Stock was approximately 8,761 consisting of 180 record holders and approximately 8,581
stockholders whose stock is held by a bank, broker or other nominee.
High and low sale prices for each quarter during the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, as
reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, were as follows:
Stock Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
High |
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
$ |
12.32 |
|
|
$ |
11.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.55 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
|
$ |
7.86 |
|
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
High |
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
$ |
8.98 |
|
|
$ |
10.72 |
|
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
6.40 |
|
|
$ |
8.11 |
|
Dividend Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. Our Board of Directors presently intends to
retain all earnings for use in our business, except for periodic stock repurchases, and does not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities in the fourth quarter or fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010. Of the 1,500,000 shares authorized to be repurchased, 135,638 shares remained
available for repurchase at September 30, 2010.
25
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES (CONTINUED) |
Performance Evaluation
The graph below compares the total cumulative stockholders return on our Common Stock for the
period from the close of the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies on September 30, 2005 to
September 30, 2010, the last day of fiscal 2010, with the total cumulative return on the CRSP Total
Return Index for the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies (the CRSP Index) and the CRSP Index
for Nasdaq Telecommunications Stocks (the Peer Index) over the same period. We have determined
that our line of business is mostly comparable to those companies in the Peer Index. The index
level for the graph and table was set to $100 on September 30, 2005, for our Common Stock, the CRSP
Index and the Peer Index and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY05 |
|
FY06 |
|
FY07 |
|
FY08 |
|
FY09 |
|
FY010 |
Digi International Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
125.82 |
|
|
|
132.71 |
|
|
|
95.06 |
|
|
|
79.40 |
|
|
|
88.44 |
|
CRSP Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
105.44 |
|
|
|
124.80 |
|
|
|
98.40 |
|
|
|
78.96 |
|
|
|
89.24 |
|
Peer Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
111.56 |
|
|
|
130.79 |
|
|
|
90.70 |
|
|
|
90.50 |
|
|
|
115.14 |
|
26
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
(In thousands except per common share amounts and number of employees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales (1) |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
$ |
144,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
92,209 |
|
|
$ |
81,265 |
|
|
$ |
97,869 |
|
|
$ |
91,346 |
|
|
$ |
77,505 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
33,499 |
|
|
|
28,591 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
24,176 |
|
|
|
20,861 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
12,830 |
|
Restructuring (benefit) costs |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
Total other income, net (3) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
Income tax provision (4) |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
$ |
11,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share, basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data as of September 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (total current assets less
total current liabilities) |
|
$ |
122,105 |
|
|
$ |
106,121 |
|
|
$ |
112,236 |
|
|
$ |
115,703 |
|
|
$ |
83,341 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
$ |
271,416 |
|
|
$ |
251,826 |
|
|
$ |
225,321 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
240,556 |
|
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
$ |
222,905 |
|
|
$ |
193,830 |
|
Book value per common share (stockholders equity
divided by outstanding shares) |
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
7.74 |
|
Number of employees as of September 30 |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquisitions provided the following net sales during the year of acquisition: MobiApps in fiscal 2009 of $0.4 million, Sarian and
Spectrum in fiscal 2008 of $6.5 million and MaxStream in fiscal 2006 of $3.2 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in general and administration expense in fiscal 2010 is $1.4 million ($0.9 million after tax) of investigation and
remediation expenses (see Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). |
|
(3) |
|
Included in total other income, net is an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.0 million ($0.7 million after tax) recorded
during fiscal 2008 on an investment in a bond issued by Lehman Brothers (see Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). |
|
(4) |
|
In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recorded net discrete tax benefits of $2.3 million, $1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively (see
Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). In fiscal 2007 and 2006, we reversed income tax reserves of $4.3 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, primarily due to the closing of a German tax audit and the statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and
state tax year and other discrete tax benefits for fiscal 2007 and the settlement of tax audits with the French government in fiscal 2006. |
27
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
We operate in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological
advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product
introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the
basis of existing and planned product features, service capabilities, company reputation, brand
recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product
development capabilities, price and availability. We help customers connect, monitor, and control
local or remote electronic devices over a network, via the Internet or via satellite.
Our revenues consist of products that are in non-embedded and embedded product groupings. The
embedded products include modules, chips, software and development tools, single-board computers,
satellite communication products and engineering design services. Non-embedded products include
cellular routers, cellular gateway products, wireless communications adapters, serial servers,
console servers, USB connected products, remote display products and serial cards. Our
non-embedded serial cards are in the mature phase of their product life cycles. Our strategy is to
focus on key applications, customers and markets to efficiently manage the migration from products
that are in the mature phase of their product life cycles to other newer technologies.
We experienced an increase in both revenue and profitability in fiscal 2010 compared to the prior
fiscal year as we partially recovered from the domestic economic downturn and benefited from
actions taken in fiscal 2009 to position ourselves for growth. Our business was negatively
impacted by the effects of the severe downturn in the economy in fiscal 2009, and we experienced a
reduction in demand for our products in all geographic locations. In response to the depressed
economic conditions, we put in place a restructuring plan that included various cost reduction
actions. We also reduced our investment in lower growth product lines while increasing our
investment in wireless products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. These
actions allowed us to reduce our profit breakeven point and remain profitable despite the negative
economic conditions that existed throughout fiscal 2009.
Net sales were $182.5 million for fiscal 2010 compared to $165.9 million in fiscal 2009, an
increase of $16.6 million, or 10.0%. Our wireless product net sales grew from $56.2 million, or
33.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2009 to $66.4 million, or 36.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2010, an
increase of 18.0%. We expect continued strength in wireless products net sales resulting from
large customer opportunities for our wireless solutions, primarily in the Smart Grid, fleet
management and medical markets.
Gross profit increased by $10.9 million, or 13.5% in fiscal 2010. Gross margin improved from 49.0%
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 to 50.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
The business restructuring discussed above contributed to the improvement in our gross margin, in
addition to other cost reduction initiatives.
Total operating expenses were $82.3 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $78.2 million in fiscal
2009, an increase of $4.1 million, or 5.2%. We suspended our non-sales incentive compensation
program for fiscal 2009, for both executive management as well as a large part of the employee
base. This program was reinstated at a reduced level for fiscal 2010. We also reduced our sales
commission program in the last half of fiscal 2009 and we fully restored the program in fiscal
2010. Also, during the last six months of fiscal 2010, we incurred $1.4 million of expense related
to the investigation and remediation that is discussed in Note 19 to our consolidated financial
statements.
28
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Net income was $8.9 million, or 4.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2010 compared to $4.1 million, or 2.5%
of net sales in fiscal 2009. Net income during fiscal 2010 benefited by $2.3 million, resulting
from the reversal of tax reserves associated with the statutory closing of a prior tax year and the
conclusion of an audit of prior tax years. Net income during fiscal 2009 benefited by $1.2
million, resulting from the reversal of tax reserves associated with the extension of the research
and development credit, the resolution of certain state tax matters, and the closing of a prior tax
year.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information from our Consolidated Statements of Operations,
expressed as a percentage of net sales and as a percentage of change from year-to-year for the
years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
compared |
|
|
compared |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
to 2009 |
|
|
to 2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of
purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
|
|
86,266 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
80,470 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
83,096 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
92,209 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
97,869 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Research and development |
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Restructuring (benefit) costs |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124.0 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
82,256 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
81,854 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
(80.8 |
) |
Total other income, net |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
145.7 |
|
|
|
(77.4 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
693.0 |
|
|
|
(97.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
119.0 |
% |
|
|
(66.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M means not meaningful
NET SALES
Net sales were $182.5 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $165.9 million in fiscal 2009, an increase
of $16.6 million or 10.0%, primarily due to an increase of $26.8 million in the net sales of
modules, cellular products, serial servers, wireless communication adaptors, USB products,
engineering design services and satellite-related products. This was partially offset by a
decrease of $4.9 million in net sales of products included in our product portfolio resulting from
the Sarian acquisition which were higher in fiscal 2009, primarily due to a large sale to a legacy
customer, and a decrease of $5.3 million in net sales due to large sales of a discontinued chip set
in fiscal 2009. The increase in net sales in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 is primarily
driven by increased volume and demand rather than pricing changes. We did not experience a
material change in revenue due to pricing. As we continue to focus on growing our wireless sales,
our wireless product net sales grew from $56.2 million, or 33.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2009, to
$66.4 million, or 36.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2010, or an increase of 18.0%.
Net sales were $165.9 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $185.1 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease
of $19.2 million or 10.3%. Revenue decreased primarily due to weakened economic conditions and
changes in product
29
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
mix. Net sales in fiscal 2009 and 2008 included $20.7 million and $6.5 million of net sales from
Sarian and Spectrum products, respectively. Fiscal 2009 net sales also included $0.4 million
attributable to MobiApps which was acquired on June 8, 2009. Fiscal 2008 net sales also included
$6.5 million of net sales from Sarian and Spectrum from their dates of acquisition. Net sales from
all other product lines decreased by $33.8 million, or 18.9%, during fiscal 2009 as compared to
fiscal 2008, primarily due to weakened economic conditions, except for increases in net sales of
cellular, wireless communication adapters and chips and software.
Fluctuation in foreign currency rates compared to the prior years rates had an unfavorable impact
on net sales of $0.3 million in fiscal 2010 and $5.9 million in fiscal 2009 and a favorable impact
on net sales of $2.2 million in fiscal 2008.
Net Sales by Product Category
The following table presents our revenue by product category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
91.2 |
|
|
$ |
98.5 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
Embedded |
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Embedded
Non-embedded products net sales increased $8.9 million, or 9.7%, in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009. The increase was mostly due to a $13.8 million increase in net sales of cellular products,
serial servers, wireless communication adaptors and USB products, offset by a decrease of $4.9
million in net sales of products included in our product portfolio resulting from the Sarian
acquisition which were higher in fiscal 2009 primarily due to a large sale to a legacy customer.
Non-embedded products net sales decreased $7.3 million, or 7.3%, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008 due mostly to decreases in sales of serial cards, serial servers and USB connected products,
partially offset by increases in cellular and wireless communication adapters. Non-embedded net
sales related to Sarian branded products were $16.2 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $5.7 million
in fiscal 2008, which included five months of Sarian net sales from the date of acquisition.
Embedded
Embedded products net sales increased $7.7 million, or 10.4%, in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009. The increase was primarily due to a $13.0 million increase in net sales of modules and
satellite-related products, partially offset by a decrease of $5.3 million primarily related to
large sales of a discontinued chip set in fiscal 2009.
Embedded products net sales decreased $11.9 million, or 13.8%, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008 due mostly to decreases of modules and network interface cards, partially offset by an
increase in chips and software. Embedded net sales in fiscal 2009 also include incremental net
sales of $3.8 million from Spectrum design services.
30
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Net Sales by Distribution Channel
The following table presents our revenue by distribution channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Direct / OEM channel |
|
$ |
66.2 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
Distribution channel |
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total company |
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2010, net sales in the Distribution channel increased by $28.9 million, or 33%
compared to net sales in fiscal 2009. Net sales in fiscal 2010 in the Direct / OEM channel
decreased by $12.3 million, or 15.7% compared to the prior fiscal year. The increase in net sales
in the Distribution channel compared to the Direct / OEM channel is
primarily due to fulfillment of customer orders for wireless products.
The decreases in net sales in both the Direct / OEM and the Distribution channels during fiscal
2009 compared to fiscal 2008 primarily resulted from a weakened economy.
We continued to focus on maintaining our channel strategy, which includes employing additional
channel partners and releasing complementary products.
Net Sales by Geographic Area
Our revenue by geographic location of our customers is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Asian countries |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in fiscal 2010 increased $16.6 million over fiscal 2009 as the U.S. economy
partially recovered from the domestic economic downturn. International net sales remained the same
and were $75.2 million, or 41.2% of net sales, in fiscal 2010, compared to $75.2 million, or 45.3%
of net sales, in fiscal 2009.
Net sales in fiscal 2010 for North America increased $16.6 million due to an increase in
non-embedded products of $11.8 million and embedded products of $4.8 million. Net sales in fiscal
2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 decreased $20.5 million in North America, partially offset by
incremental revenue of $3.8 million from the Spectrum acquisition in July 2008.
Net sales in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) decreased $8.3 million from fiscal 2009 to
fiscal 2010 as fiscal 2009 included large sales of a discontinued chip set and a large sale to a
legacy customer of Sarian. The increase in net sales in EMEA during fiscal 2009 and 2008 is
primarily due to the acquisition of Sarian in April 2008, which provided revenue of $16.2 million
and $5.7 million, respectively.
31
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Revenue for the Latin America and Asian countries increased by $8.3 million in fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009, and revenue decreased by $5.6 million in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The
increase in revenue for fiscal 2010 for both Latin America and Asian countries was due to an
increase of $4.9 million of embedded products and $3.4 million of non-embedded products. Also in
fiscal 2010, we recorded a full year of net sales related to the MobiApps acquisition compared to
three months of net sales in fiscal 2009. The decrease in revenue for fiscal 2009 compared to
fiscal 2008 for Latin America was primarily due to a reduction in net sales of non-embedded
products and for Asian countries was due to a reduction in net sales of both embedded and
non-embedded products primarily resulting from the global economic conditions in both regions.
MobiApps revenue of $0.3 million from date of acquisition of June 2009 is included in fiscal 2009
Asian countries revenue.
GROSS PROFIT
2010 compared to 2009
Gross profit was $92.2 million and $81.3 million in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase
of $10.9 million, or 13.5%. The gross margin for fiscal 2010 was 50.5% compared to 49.0% in fiscal
2009. Gross margin increased 2.1% primarily due to a reduction of costs as a result of the
business restructuring in fiscal 2009 and other cost reduction initiatives and also increased 0.3%
related to a reduction in amortization of purchased and core technology as some technology is fully
amortized. This was partially offset by a 0.9% decrease in gross margin due to unfavorable product
mix primarily related to cellular and certain embedded products. Amortization of purchased and
core technology was $4.1 million or 2.2% of net sales in fiscal 2010 as compared to $4.2 million or
2.5% of net sales in fiscal 2009.
2009 Compared to 2008
Gross margin for fiscal 2009 was 49.0% compared to 52.9% for 2008. The decrease in gross margin is
primarily a result of product and customer mix changes as we had a large sale to a legacy customer
which generated a lower gross margin. The gross margin also decreased due to an increase in the
amortization of purchased and core technology due to the acquisitions of Sarian, Spectrum and
MobiApps. Amortization of purchased and core technology was $4.2 million or 2.5% of net sales in
fiscal 2009 as compared to $4.1 million or 2.2% of net sales in fiscal 2008.
OPERATING EXPENSES
2010 Compared to 2009
Operating expenses were $82.3 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $4.1 million or 5.2%, compared
to $78.2 million in fiscal 2009. Compensation-related expenses, including salaries, incentive
compensation, commissions and stock-based compensation increased $1.8 million as we fully restored
the sales commission program and partially reinstated our non-sales incentive compensation program
for fiscal 2010. We also incurred professional fees of $1.4 million related to the investigation
and remediation that is discussed in Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements and
incremental ongoing expenses related to the fiscal 2009 MobiApps acquisition of $1.6 million.
Sales and marketing expenses were $37.0 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $1.7 million or
4.8%, compared to $35.3 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was due to an increase of $1.0
million in commission expense, $0.4 million in incremental expenses for MobiApps and $0.3 million
of other various sales and marketing expenses.
32
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
Research and development expenses were $27.8 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $1.4 million or
5.5%, compared to $26.4 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was due to an increase of $0.9
million in professional services, contract labor and certification testing, $0.7 million in
incremental expenses for MobiApps, and $0.4 million of compensation-related expenses, offset by a
net reduction of $0.6 million of expense primarily related to a development project that was
completed in fiscal 2009.
General and administrative expenses were $17.9 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $3.4 million
or 22.9%, compared to $14.5 million in fiscal 2009. General and administrative expenses increased
by $2.0 million due to increased professional fees which includes $1.4 million of investigation and
remediation fees (see Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, the
incremental expenses for MobiApps increased general and administrative expenses by $0.5 million,
compensation-related expenses increased by $0.3 million and other miscellaneous general and
administrative expenses increased by $0.6 million.
2009 Compared to 2008
Operating expenses were $78.2 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $3.7 million or 4.5%, compared
to $81.9 million in fiscal 2008. Compensation-related expenses, including salaries, incentive
compensation and stock-based compensation, decreased by $3.2 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to
fiscal 2008 due to the suspension of our non-sales incentive program for fiscal 2009 and a
reduction of our sales commission program in the last half of fiscal 2009 as well as a reduction in
the number of employees. Incremental operating expenses resulting from the acquisitions of Sarian,
Spectrum and MobiApps were $4.4 million. We recorded a charge of $1.9 million for in-process
research and development incurred in 2008 resulting from the Sarian acquisition. On April 23,
2009, we announced a restructuring initiative that resulted in a restructuring charge of $2.0
million.
Sales and marketing expenses were $35.3 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.6 million or 4.3%,
compared to $36.9 million in fiscal 2008. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $0.9 million
for compensation-related expenses, $1.2 million for advertising and marketing literature, $0.5
million for reduced travel and entertainment and by $0.3 million for miscellaneous other sales and
marketing expenses. This was partially offset by incremental expenses related to Sarian, Spectrum
and MobiApps which increased sales and marketing expenses by $1.3 million.
Research and development expenses were $26.4 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $0.7 million or
2.4%, compared to $27.1 million in fiscal 2008. Research and development expenses decreased by
$1.2 million for compensation-related expenses, $0.3 million for product certifications and $0.5
million for other research and development expenses. This was partially offset by incremental
expenses for Sarian, Spectrum and MobiApps which increased research and development expenses by
$1.3 million.
General and administrative expenses were $14.5 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.5 million
or 9.2%, compared to 16.0 million in fiscal 2008. The reduction in general and administrative
expenses were due to decreases of $1.1 million for compensation-related expenses, $0.6 million for
professional fees, $0.5 million for amortization and depreciation, $0.6 million for bad debt
expense and a $0.5 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses. This was
partially offset by incremental expenses of $1.8 million due to Sarian, Spectrum and MobiApps.
33
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
RESTRUCTURING
On April 23, 2009 we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless
products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring
included the closing of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation
and consolidation of the manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minnetonka,
Minnesota headquarters. We paid a lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in
Davis and had vacated the facility as of September 30, 2009. We continue to maintain
non-manufacturing activities at the remaining leased facility in Davis, California. As a
result of these initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0
million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee termination costs for 86
positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other relocation costs.
All 86 positions were vacated as of September 30, 2009. The employee termination costs
included severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement
services. The other restructuring expenses included contract termination fees for non-renewal
of lease terms relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses
for employees.
During fiscal 2010, we recorded an additional $0.1 million for an additional six months of
continued medical benefits as a result of new healthcare legislation passed in December 2009
related to the aforementioned restructuring. Also during fiscal 2010 we reversed $0.5 million
of the restructuring accrual since costs associated with continued medical benefits and
relocation were lower than expected.
ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Sarian Systems, Ltd.
On April 28, 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian). Prior to the acquisition,
Sarian was a privately held corporation. Sarian is located in the United Kingdom and is a
leader in the European wireless router market. The total purchase price of $30.9 million was
for all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Sarian.
At the time of acquisition, Sarian had development projects in process associated with the IPV6,
Gate Array and VPN technologies. We estimated that $1.9 million of the purchase price represented
the fair value of acquired in-process research and development related to the products listed below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
IPV6 |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Gate Array |
|
|
400 |
|
VPN technologies |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total in-process research and development |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
These products were under development, had a measurable percentage completed and a documented
expected life, had not yet reached technological feasibility, and had no alternative future uses.
This amount was expensed as a non-deductible tax charge upon consummation of the acquisition.
All of the acquired development projects were completed in fiscal 2009.
34
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OTHER INCOME, NET
2010 Compared to 2009
Total other income, net was $0.6 million in fiscal 2010, a decrease of $0.6 million compared to
$1.2 million in fiscal 2009. We realized interest income on marketable securities and cash and
cash equivalents of $0.4 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $1.4 million in fiscal 2009. Although
our average investment balance during fiscal 2010 was $69.0 million compared to $57.6 million in
fiscal 2009, the decrease in interest income was primarily due to a lower than average interest
rate as we earned an average interest rate of 0.5% during fiscal 2010 compared to 2.4% during
fiscal 2009. Interest expense was $0.1 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to $0.3 million in
fiscal 2009 as we made one of the deferred payments during fiscal 2010 for the Spectrum
acquisition. Other income, net also increased $0.3 million related to a net increase in foreign
currency transaction gains in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
2009 Compared to 2008
Other income, net was $1.2 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.7 million compared to $2.9
million in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we realized $1.4 million of interest income on
marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.6 million during fiscal 2008.
The decrease in interest income was due to lower average investment balances and lower average
interest rates. The average investment balance during fiscal 2009 was $57.6 million compared to
$77.1 million for fiscal 2008. We earned an average interest rate of 2.4% during fiscal 2009
compared to 4.5% for fiscal 2008. Other income, net also decreased $0.4 million related to a net
decrease in foreign currency transaction gains in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Further, we
recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.0 million in fiscal 2008 related to a bond
issued by Lehman Brothers. No additional impairment was recorded in fiscal 2009.
INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 15.0%, 4.6% and 34.7% for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
During fiscal 2010, we reversed $2.3 million in income tax reserves associated primarily with the
closing of prior tax years through statute expiration and the conclusion of a federal tax audit.
While the statutes of limitations have not expired, U.S. federal income tax returns for the periods
ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 have been audited by and settled with the Internal
Revenue Service. The aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax
reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 22 percentage points in
fiscal 2010.
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2008, we reversed $0.3 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. We recorded an additional $0.2
million of discrete tax benefits as a result of a filing of a prior year tax return and adjustments
to actual for items reported on the tax returns for fiscal 2007.
35
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
INFLATION
Management believes that during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, inflation has not had a material
effect on our operations or on our consolidated financial position.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our operations principally with funds generated from operations. We had cash,
cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $87.6 million, $70.7 million and $73.5
million at September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our working capital was $122.1
million, $106.1 million and $112.2 million at September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow Highlights (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
16,095 |
|
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
|
$ |
24,070 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
25,286 |
|
|
|
(22,370 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
$ |
34,258 |
|
|
$ |
(4,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $16.1 million during fiscal 2010 compared
to $15.7 million during fiscal 2009, a net increase of $0.4 million. This net increase is due
to an increase in net income of $4.9 million and a net increase of $0.2 million of other
non-cash items, offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in deferred income taxes and a $3.7
million decrease due to changes in working capital. Changes in working capital decreased cash
flows by $3.7 million primarily due to an $11.9 million decrease in accounts receivable as the
receivables balance increased due to higher revenue in September 2010 than in September 2009.
Inventory levels were approximately the same at September 30, 2010 and 2009, however
inventories decreased $3.6 million at September 30, 2009 compared to 2008. This was offset by
a net increase of $6.0 million related to changes in accounts payable and a net increase of
$5.8 million related to changes in other assets and accrued expenses. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $15.7 million during fiscal 2009 compared to $24.1 million for fiscal
2008, a net decrease of $8.4 million. This net decrease is primarily due to a decrease in net
income of $8.3 million, and decreases of $1.0 million related to an other-than-temporary
impairment charge during fiscal 2008, $1.1 million in deferred income taxes, and $1.9 million
related to an in-process research and development charge in fiscal 2008. This was partially
offset by an increase of $1.1 million of other non-cash items and an increase of $3.5 million
due to changes in working capital. The changes in working capital increased cash flows by
$3.5 million primarily due to increases resulting from changes in accounts receivable and
inventories, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable, income taxes payable
(receivable) and other accrued expenses.
Net cash used by investing activities was $15.2 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to net cash
provided by investing activities of $25.3 million during fiscal 2009, a net decrease of $40.5
million. Net purchases of marketable securities in fiscal 2010 offset by net settlements of
marketable securities in fiscal 2009 resulted in a net decrease of $41.3 million. We used cash of
$3.0 million for a deferred payment related to the Spectrum acquisition. In fiscal 2009 we spent
$3.0 million related to the acquisition of the assets of MobiApps and reduced our capital
expenditures by $0.8 million. Net cash provided by investing activities was $25.3 million in
36
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
fiscal 2009 as compared to net cash used by investing activities of $22.4 million in fiscal 2008,
an increase of $47.7 million. The increase is a result of $23.5 million of additional net proceeds
of marketable securities. Cash spent on acquisitions and contingent purchase price payments in
fiscal 2008 was $33.2 million compared to $3.0 million in fiscal 2009. We spent $0.5 million less
in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 on capital expenditures. In fiscal 2008 we received $6.9
million relating to the sale of our building in Dortmund, Germany in fiscal 2008 (see Note 12 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements) offset by a deposit of $0.4 million in a restricted cash
account related to the leaseback.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.6 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to net cash
used in financing activities of $5.4 million in fiscal 2009, a net increase of $8.0 million. We
spent $6.6 million related to treasury stock repurchases in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009, we received an additional $1.1 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options and employee stock purchase plan transactions and spent $0.3 million less in capital lease
payments. Net cash used in financing activities was $5.4 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to
$2.6 million in fiscal 2008, a net decrease of $2.9 million as a result of a $1.4 million decrease
from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan transactions and $1.5 million
of additional cash usage for the repurchase of treasury stock.
We expect positive cash flows from operations and believe that our current cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities balances, cash generated from operations and our ability to secure debt
and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund our business operations for the next twelve
months and beyond.
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by fiscal period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
7,370 |
|
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
Deferred payments on acquisition |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
10,370 |
|
|
$ |
5,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
|
The operating lease agreements included above primarily relate to office space. The table
above does not include possible payments for uncertain tax positions. Our reserve for uncertain
tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties, was $2.8 million as of September 30, 2010.
Due to the nature of the underlying liabilities and the extended time often needed to resolve
income tax uncertainties, we cannot make reliable estimates of the amount or timing of cash
payments that may be required to settle these liabilities.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds or Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk as the
financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S.
Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce foreign
currency risk.
During 2010, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $27.6 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro
and British Pound.
37
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
FOREIGN CURRENCY (CONTINUED)
During 2009 and 2008, we had approximately $75.2 million and $76.1 million, respectively, of net
sales to foreign customers including export sales, of which $33.4 million and $45.7 million,
respectively, were denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro and British Pound in
fiscal 2009 and predominantly the Euro in fiscal 2008. In future periods, a significant portion of
sales will continue to be made in Euros and British Pounds.
During fiscal 2008, we acquired Sarian for $30.9 million, which was partially financed by an
intercompany loan from both Digi International Inc. for $25.0 million and Digi GmbH for $2.9
million. The Digi GmbH intercompany loan for $2.9 million was paid in March 2009 and the Digi
International Inc. $25.0 million loan was converted to capital on October 1, 2008. The translation
adjustments related to the $2.9 million intercompany loan were recorded in other income, net within
our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued an amendment to the
accounting standards that provides guidance on criteria used to define a milestone and determines
when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or
development transactions. Consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone can be
recognized in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the
milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. In addition, certain disclosures
related to the milestone method of revenue recognition will be required. We adopted this provision
on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards that provides guidance
for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple
deliverables exist, and for allocating and recognizing revenue based on those separate
deliverables. This guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being
separable than under current guidance. This amendment is effective for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. We adopted this
provision on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain
revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing
accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software
components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality shall be
excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly,
sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards
or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement
consideration for each element of the arrangement. This amendment is effective for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. We
adopted this provision on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires us to make
38
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the values of purchased assets
and assumed liabilities in acquisitions. We base our estimates on historical experience and
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies impact our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of embedded and non-embedded products to our
distributors and Direct (end-user) / OEM customers, and to a small extent from the sale of software
licenses, fees associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services
and royalties. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably
assured and there are no post-delivery obligations other than warranty.
Under these criteria, product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment of product to
customers. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and Direct / OEMs are made with certain
rights of return and price adjustment provisions. Estimated reserves for future returns and
pricing adjustments are established by us based on an analysis of historical patterns of returns
and price adjustments as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to received returns,
current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current period.
Estimated reserves for future returns and price adjustments are charged against revenues in the
same period as the corresponding sales are recorded. Material differences between the historical
trends used to determine estimated reserves and actual returns and pricing adjustments could result
in a material change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. We have
applied consistent methodologies for estimating reserves for future returns and pricing adjustments
for all years presented. The reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments was $1.1 million
at both September 30, 2010 and 2009.
We also generate revenue from the sale of software licenses, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services and royalties.
Revenue recognized resulting from such non-product sales represented 3.3%, 3.0% and 1.2% of net
sales in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our software development tools and development
boards often include multiple elements, including hardware, software licenses, post-contract
customer support, limited training and basic hardware design review. Our customers purchase these
products and services during their product development process in which they use the tools to build
network connectivity into the devices they are manufacturing. Revenue for software licenses,
professional and engineering services and training is recognized upon performance, which includes
delivery of a final product version and acceptance by the customer. Revenues from contracts with
multiple element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned based on the relative fair
value of each element provided the delivered elements have value to customers on a standalone
basis. Amounts allocated to each element are based on its objectively determined fair value, such
as the sales price for the product or service when it is sold separately.
39
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
We regularly monitor and evaluate the realizable value of our marketable securities. When
assessing marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider factors
including how significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the original cost, how long
the market value of the investment has been less than its original cost, the underlying factors
contributing to a decline in the prices of securities in a single asset class, the performance of
the issuers stock price in relation to the stock price of its competitors within the industry,
expected market volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of external investment managers, any
news or financial information that has been released specific to the investee and the outlook for
the overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and circumstances indicate that a
decline in the value of these securities has occurred and is other-than-temporary, we would record
a charge to other income (expense).
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, which reflects the estimate of losses that may
result from the inability of some of our customers to make required payments. The estimate for the
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on known circumstances regarding collectability of
customer accounts and historical collections experience. If the financial condition of one or more
of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. Material differences between the historical trends used to estimate
the allowance for doubtful accounts and actual collection experience could result in a material
change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. The allowance for doubtful
accounts was $0.5 million at September 30, 2010 and $0.6 million at September 30, 2009.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. We reduce the carrying value of our inventories for estimated excess
and obsolete inventories equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated
realizable value based upon assumptions about future product demand and market conditions. Once
the new cost basis is established, the value is not increased with any changes in circumstances
that would indicate an increase after the remeasurement. If actual product demand or market
conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs
may be required that could result in a material change to our consolidated results of operations or
financial position. We have applied consistent methodologies for the net realizable value of
inventories.
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. At June 30, 2010, our market capitalization
was below the carrying value of our reporting unit. However, our market capitalization plus our
estimated control premium of 35% resulted in a fair value in excess of our carrying value and
therefore no impairment was indicated. In order for our carrying value to equal fair value, we
would have required approximately a 14% control premium. The control premium represents the amount
an investor would pay, over and above market capitalization, in order to obtain a controlling
interest in a company. The estimated control premium was determined by a review of premiums paid
for similar companies over the past five years. At September 30, 2010, our market capitalization,
which is an indicator of fair value, continued to be below the carrying value of our reporting
unit; however, including the control premium there continued to be no indication of goodwill
impairment at September 30, 2010. In order for our carrying value to equal fair value, we would
have required approximately a 1% control premium.
40
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
INCOME TAXES
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and could result in adjustments to our income tax balances that are material to our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
We have unrecognized tax benefits of $2.8 million classified as a long-term liability as we do not
expect significant payments to occur over the next 12 months. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits that if recognized would affect our effective tax rate is $2.2 million. We recognize
interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
WARRANTIES
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from one to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective due to material or
workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is
recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the
estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty
incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty accrual.
The product warranty accrual was $0.9 million at September 30, 2010 and $1.0 million at September
30, 2009.
41
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use
derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate risk.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds or Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk as the
financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S.
Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce foreign
currency risk.
During fiscal 2010, the average monthly exchange rate for the Euro to the U.S. Dollar increased by
approximately 0.2% from 1.3547 to 1.3574, the average monthly exchange rate for the British Pound
to the U.S. Dollar increased approximately 0.5% from 1.5517 to 1.5596 and the average monthly
exchange rate for the Japanese Yen to the U.S. Dollar increased by approximately 6.2% from .0105 to
..0112. A 10.0% change from the 2010 average exchange rate for the Euro, British Pound and Yen to
the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a 1.5% increase or decrease in annual net sales and a 2.0%
increase or decrease in stockholders equity. The above analysis does not take into consideration
any pricing adjustments we may make in response to changes in the exchange rate.
CREDIT RISK
We have some exposure to credit risk related to our accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure to
credit risk is controlled through regular monitoring of customer financial status, credit limits
and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
Investments are made in accordance with our investment policy and consist of certificates of
deposit, corporate bonds and government bonds. We may have some exposure related to the fair value
of our securities, which could change significantly based on changes in market conditions. If
market conditions deteriorate, we may incur impairment charges for securities in our investment
portfolio.
42
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Digi International Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of operations, of cash flows and of stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss)
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Digi International Inc. and its
subsidiaries at September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2010 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 23, 2010
43
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
|
|
86,266 |
|
|
|
80,470 |
|
|
|
83,096 |
|
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
92,209 |
|
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
97,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
Restructuring (benefit) costs |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research & development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
82,256 |
|
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
81,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
Impairment of marketable security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, basic |
|
|
24,865 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
25,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, diluted |
|
|
25,154 |
|
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
26,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
44
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
|
$ |
48,434 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
36,634 |
|
|
|
22,311 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
24,090 |
|
|
|
19,032 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,550 |
|
|
|
26,619 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
143,702 |
|
|
|
122,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
|
16,678 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
19,851 |
|
|
|
26,877 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
86,210 |
|
|
|
86,558 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Other |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,449 |
|
|
$ |
5,567 |
|
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
3,756 |
|
Deferred payment on acquisition |
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
21,597 |
|
|
|
16,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
4,893 |
|
Deferred payment on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
26,409 |
|
|
|
29,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
28,666,311 and 28,409,198 shares issued |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
185,427 |
|
|
|
181,282 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
91,649 |
|
|
|
82,708 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,584,215 and 3,708,302 shares |
|
|
(27,218 |
) |
|
|
(28,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
240,556 |
|
|
|
229,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
45
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, equipment and improvements |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets and other assets |
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
6,830 |
|
Bad debt/product return (benefit) provision, net |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
Inventory obsolescence |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
Impairment on marketable security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
(3,656 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
Restructuring |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research & development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Other |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,525 |
) |
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
(3,093 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Income taxes (receivable) payable |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
(4,561 |
) |
|
|
3,322 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3,187 |
|
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
16,095 |
|
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
|
$ |
24,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(38,538 |
) |
|
|
(30,489 |
) |
|
|
(69,196 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
29,335 |
|
|
|
62,624 |
|
|
|
77,857 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6,954 |
|
Purchase of property, equipment, improvements and certain
other intangible assets |
|
|
(2,975 |
) |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
Contingent purchase price payments related to acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
Deferred cash payout for acquisition of business |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
|
|
(31,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
25,286 |
|
|
|
(22,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
Borrowing on note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Payment on note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option plan transactions |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan transactions |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
34,258 |
|
|
|
(4,199 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
48,434 |
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
|
$ |
48,434 |
|
|
$ |
14,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flows Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
|
$ |
3,944 |
|
|
$ |
8,143 |
|
Other non-cash financing and investing items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred payment liability related to acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,537 |
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
46
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
28,154 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
$ |
(18,435 |
) |
|
$ |
172,156 |
|
|
$ |
66,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
|
$ |
222,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect from adoption
of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
(22,691 |
) |
|
|
177,614 |
|
|
|
78,625 |
|
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on
investments
(net of related tax effect of $2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reclassification of gain into net
income
(net of related tax effect of $3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
28,409 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
(28,161 |
) |
|
|
181,282 |
|
|
|
82,708 |
|
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,074 |
) |
|
|
(3,074 |
) |
Net unrealized gain on investments
(net of related tax effect of $22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Reclassification of gain into net
income
(net of related tax effect of $14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894 |
|
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
28,666 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
(27,218 |
) |
|
|
185,427 |
|
|
|
91,649 |
|
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
|
$ |
240,556 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION
We are a worldwide leader in device networking for business and make wireless machine-to-machine
(M2M) connectivity easy. We offer high levels of performance, flexibility and quality, and market
our products through a global network of distributors and resellers, systems integrators and
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). We are heavily focused on four application markets, and
we offer solution bundles for energy monitoring and management, tank
monitoring and fleet management.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts and other highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due
to the short maturities of these investments.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. We changed our policy as of October 1, 2008 to account for our marketable
securities as available-for-sale on a prospective basis. Prior to October 1, 2008 all
marketable securities purchased were classified as held-to-maturity and were carried at
amortized cost. All marketable securities purchased after October 1, 2008 are carried at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders
equity. We obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security, where
available, review the financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant
information to estimate the fair value for each security in our investment portfolio.
We regularly monitor and evaluate the value of our marketable securities. When assessing
marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider factors including how
significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the original cost, how long the market value
of the investment has been less than its original cost, the underlying factors contributing to a
decline in the prices of securities in a single asset class, the performance of the issuers stock
price in relation to the stock price of its competitors within the industry, expected market
volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of external investment managers, any news or
financial information that has been released specific to the investee and the outlook for the
overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and circumstances indicate that a decline
in the value of a security has occurred and is other-than-temporary, we would record a charge to
other income (expense).
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect, which is net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. The following factors are considered when determining the collectability of
specific customer accounts: customer creditworthiness, past transaction history with the customer,
and changes in customer payment terms or
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (CONTINUED)
practices. In addition, overall historical collection experience, current economic industry
trends, and a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable are considered when
determining the required allowance for doubtful accounts. Based on our assessment, we provide for
estimated uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to our allowance for
doubtful accounts. Balances that remain outstanding after we have used reasonable collection
efforts are written off through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to
accounts receivable.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Appropriate consideration is given to deterioration, obsolescence and
other factors in evaluating fair market value.
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS, NET
Property, equipment and improvements are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided by charges to operations using the straight-line method over the estimated
asset useful lives. Furniture and fixtures and other equipment are depreciated over a period of
three to five years. Building improvements and buildings are depreciated over ten and thirty-nine
years, respectively. Equipment under capital lease is depreciated over the lease term. We own and
occupy two buildings located in Minnetonka and Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while major
renewals and betterments are capitalized. The assets and related accumulated depreciation accounts
are adjusted for asset retirements and disposals with the resulting gain or loss included in
operations.
IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Purchased proven technology, license agreements, covenants not to compete and other identifiable
intangible assets are recorded at fair value when acquired in a business acquisition, or at cost
when not purchased in a business acquisition. Purchased in-process research and development costs
(IPR&D) were previously expensed upon consummation of the related business acquisition. Effective
October 1, 2009 in-process research and development costs are capitalized according to
authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to business combinations. We have not yet incurred
any capitalized in-process research and development. All other identifiable intangible assets are
amortized on either a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three to thirteen
years or based on the pattern in which the asset is consumed. Useful lives for identifiable
intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based on the periods of time from which
we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable intangible assets. Amortization of purchased
and core technology is presented as a separate component of cost of sales in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Amortization of all other acquired identifiable intangible assets is
charged to operating expense as a component of general and administrative expense.
Identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate that undiscounted expected future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying
value amount. We measure impairment loss by utilizing an undiscounted cash flow valuation
technique using fair values indicated by the income approach. Impairment losses, if any, would be
recorded in the period the impairment is identified. No impairments were identified during fiscal
2010, 2009 or 2008.
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. At June 30, 2010, our market capitalization
was below the carrying value of our reporting unit. However, our market capitalization plus our
estimated control premium of 35% resulted in a fair value in excess of our carrying value and
therefore no impairment was indicated. In order for our carrying value to equal fair value, we
would have required approximately a 14% control premium. The control premium represents the amount
an investor would pay over and above market capitalization in order to obtain a controlling
interest in a company. The estimated control premium was determined by a review of premiums paid
for similar companies over the past five years.
In order to compute the control premium, three methodologies were used, including (1) analyzing
individual transactions within our industry, (2) analyzing industry-wide data, and (3) analyzing
global transaction data. Individual transactions in the Communication Equipment and Computer &
Peripherals industries were used to find transactions of target companies that operated in similar
markets and shared similar operating characteristics with Digi. Transaction screening criteria
included selection of transactions with the following characteristics:
|
|
|
At least 50 percent of a target companys equity sought by an acquirer, |
|
|
|
|
Target company considered operating (not in bankruptcy), |
|
|
|
|
Target company had publicly traded stock outstanding at the transaction date, and |
|
|
|
|
Transactions announced between June 30, 2006 and the valuation date. |
In analyzing industry-wide data, transactions in three industries were identified that encompassed
the products offered by us: Office Equipment and Computer Hardware, Communications, and Computer,
Supplies and Services. Finally, control premiums were considered for both domestic and
international transactions.
Using the data from the above analyses, an overall range of control premiums was identified as of
the June 30, 2009 valuation date and resulted in a concluded range of control premium of 25 percent
to 35 percent as of June 30, 2009. The control premium percentage that was used in estimating the
fair value of our reporting unit was 35 percent at our June 30, 2009 annual goodwill impairment
assessment. A review of historical control premiums paid indicated that control premiums were
generally higher during economic downturns, when selling prices of target companies were likely
undervalued, and acquirers were willing to pay higher control premiums. We concluded that the high
end of the range of control premiums best represented the amount an investor would pay, over and
above market capitalization, in order to obtain a controlling interest given the current economic
conditions. If we had selected the low end of the range of control premiums, our fair value would
still have exceeded our carrying value for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment assessment at
June 30, 2009. Based on our industry knowledge and discussions with an independent third party
valuation firm in June 2010, we concluded that the control premium study that was performed in
conjunction with our annual goodwill impairment assessment on June 30, 2009 remained valid for June
30, 2010 and that the 35 percent control premium used in our prior years assessment continued to
best represent the amount an investor would pay, over and above market capitalization, in order to
obtain a controlling interest given the current economic conditions.
At September 30, 2010, our market capitalization, which is an indicator of fair value, continued to
be below the carrying value of our reporting unit; however, with the control premium there
continued to be no indication of goodwill impairment at September 30, 2010. In order for our
carrying value to equal fair value, we would have required approximately a 1% control premium.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL (CONTINUED)
Based on our annual goodwill impairment assessment on June 30, 2009, we concluded that the fair
value of our reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount and, therefore, no potential goodwill
impairment was indicated.
We have defined the criteria that will result in additional interim goodwill impairment
testing. If these criteria are met, we will undertake an analysis to determine whether a
goodwill impairment has occurred, which could have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations. The evaluation of asset impairment may require
us to make assumptions about future cash flows and revenues. These assumptions require
significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed or estimated amounts. If
these estimates and assumptions change, we may be required to recognize impairment losses in
the future.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to revenue
recognition. We reclassified fiscal 2009 and 2008 Spectrum design services revenue from product
sales to non-product sales to conform to the current year presentation.
Revenue recognized for product sales was 96.7%, 97.0% and 98.8% in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably
assured and there are no post-delivery obligations, other than warranty. Under these criteria,
product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment of product to customers, including Direct
(end-user) / OEMs and distributors. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and Direct / OEMs
are made with certain rights of return and price adjustment provisions. Estimated reserves for
future returns and pricing adjustments are established by us based on an analysis of historical
patterns of returns and price adjustments as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to
received returns, current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current
period. Estimated reserves for future returns and price adjustments are charged against revenues
in the same period as the corresponding sales are recorded.
We also generate revenue from the sale of software licenses, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services, and royalties.
Revenue recognized resulting from such non-product sales represented 3.3%, 3.0%, and 1.2% of net
sales in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our software development tools and development
boards often include multiple elements, including hardware, software licenses, post-contract
customer support, limited training and basic hardware design review. Our customers purchase these
products and services during their product development process in which they use the tools to build
network connectivity into the devices they are manufacturing. Revenue for software licenses,
professional and engineering services and training is recognized upon performance, which includes
delivery of a final product version and acceptance by the customer. For post-contract customer
support and fees associated with technical support, revenue is deferred and recognized over the
life of the contract as service is performed. Royalty revenue is recognized when cash is received
from the customer. Unearned post-contract customer support and unearned nonrecurring engineering
services revenue is included in deferred revenue on the balance sheet.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. Research and development costs include
compensation, allocation of corporate costs, depreciation, utilities, professional services and
prototypes. Software development costs are expensed as incurred until the point that technological
feasibility and proven
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
marketability of the product are established. To date, the time period between the establishment
of technological feasibility and completion of software development has been short, and no
significant development costs have been incurred during that period. Accordingly, we have not
capitalized any software development costs to date.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year
end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. Income tax expense is equal to the tax payable
for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities and also
changes in income tax reserves.
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during
the period. Our only potentially dilutive common shares are those that result from dilutive common
stock options and shares purchased through the employee stock purchase plan.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the net income per
common share calculations (in thousands, except per common share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
24,865 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
25,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares |
|
|
25,154 |
|
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
26,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the weighted-average shares used in the diluted
earnings per share computation. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds from exercise of an
option, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that we have not yet
recognized, and the amount of estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if
any, when the option is exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current
period.
Stock options to purchase 2,493,261, 3,109,829 and 2,336,693 common shares at September 30, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common
share because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common
shares and, therefore, their effect would be antidilutive.
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost of employee services received in exchange
for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. This cost
must be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide the service
(usually the vesting period).
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Financial position and results of operations of our international subsidiaries are measured using
local currencies as the functional currency, except for our Singapore location which uses the U.S.
Dollar as its local currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated at the
exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period. Statements of operations accounts
are translated at the weighted average rates of exchange prevailing during each reporting period.
Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing currency exchange rates from period to
period are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders equity.
Gains and losses on foreign currency exchange transactions, as well as translation gains or losses
on transactions denominated in currencies other than an entitys functional currency are reflected
in the statement of operations. Net transaction gains and losses are recorded to other income
(expense) and amounted to $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.5 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce the risk of
foreign currency translation exposures.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to fiscal year 2010 presentation.
These reclassifications had no impact on our consolidated net sales or our consolidated net income.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Our comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation
adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, which are
charged or credited to the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account in stockholders
equity.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued an amendment to the
accounting standards that provides guidance on criteria used to define a milestone and determines
when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or
development transactions. Consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone can be
recognized in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the
milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. In addition, certain disclosures
related to the milestone method of revenue recognition will be required. We adopted this provision
on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS (CONTINUED)
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards that provides guidance
for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple
deliverables exist, and for allocating and recognizing revenue based on those separate
deliverables. This guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being
separable than under current guidance. This amendment is effective for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. We adopted this
provision on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain
revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing
accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software
components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality shall be
excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly,
sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards
or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement
consideration for each element of the arrangement. This amendment is effective for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. We
adopted this provision on October 1, 2010. We do not expect this amendment to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
On June 8, 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
(MobiApps), a developer of machine-to-machine (M2M) communications technology focusing on
satellite, cellular, and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has locations in India,
Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreements, Digi
International acquired the U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In addition, we established
Digi Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India Private Limited, which acquired the
assets of MobiApps affiliate companies, located in Singapore and India, respectively. The
acquisition was a cash transaction for $3.0 million. At September 30, 2010, it has been determined
that certain performance milestones were not achieved; therefore the contingent payment of $0.5
million is not payable.
We have determined that the MobiApps acquisition is not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
Sarian Systems, Ltd.
On April 28, 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian). Prior to the acquisition,
Sarian was a privately held corporation located in the United Kingdom. The total purchase
price of $30.9 million was for all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Sarian.
The purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. The purchase price allocation resulted in non-deductible goodwill of
$15.4 million and a charge of $1.9 million for acquired in-process research and development.
We believe that the acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because
Sarians wireless IP-based routing capability is highly complementary to our market approach
and significantly expands our wireless offering.
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations have been prepared
as if the acquisition of Sarian had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented (in
thousands, except per common share amounts). Pro forma adjustments include amortization of
identifiable intangible assets and the $1.9 million charge related to acquired in-process research
and development associated with the Sarian acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
192,734 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
Net income per common share, basic |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Net income per common share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations is not necessarily
indicative of results that would have occurred had the Sarian acquisition occurred as of the
beginning of the period presented above, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results that will
be obtained in the future.
Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc.
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digi International Inc. Prior to the acquisition, Spectrum was a privately held
Minneapolis-based corporation and performed wireless design services. The acquisition was a cash
merger for $10.0 million of which $4.0 million was paid on the acquisition date, $3.0 million was
paid in January 2010, and the remaining $3.0 million will be paid in July 2011. The remaining
deferred payment of $3.0 million is recorded as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet at
its current net present value of $2.9 million, on which interest is accrued up until the time of
payment.
We determined that the Spectrum acquisition was not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Identifiable Intangible Assets, net
Amortized identifiable intangible assets, net as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 are comprised of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
Net |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased and core technology |
|
$ |
46,484 |
|
|
$ |
(38,917 |
) |
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
|
$ |
46,583 |
|
|
$ |
(34,893 |
) |
|
$ |
11,690 |
|
License agreements |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
(2,464 |
) |
|
|
376 |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
(6,522 |
) |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
9,292 |
|
|
|
(5,536 |
) |
|
|
3,756 |
|
Customer maintenance contracts |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
(9,096 |
) |
|
|
8,385 |
|
|
|
17,607 |
|
|
|
(7,334 |
) |
|
|
10,273 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,297 |
|
|
$ |
(58,446 |
) |
|
$ |
19,851 |
|
|
$ |
78,063 |
|
|
$ |
(51,186 |
) |
|
$ |
26,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
2010 |
|
$ |
7,484 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
7,476 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
6,830 |
|
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
2011 |
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
4,467 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
2,784 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance, October 1 |
|
$ |
86,558 |
|
|
$ |
86,578 |
|
Acquisition of MobiApps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30 |
|
$ |
86,210 |
|
|
$ |
86,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
We have a single operating and reporting segment. Our revenues consist of products that are
in non-embedded and embedded product categories. Non-embedded products are connected
externally to a device or larger system to provide wired or wireless network connectivity or
port expansion, while embedded products are used by a product developer to build an electronic
device in which the product provides processing power, wired Ethernet, or wireless network
connectivity to that device. The products included in the non-embedded product category
include cellular routers, gateways, wireless communication adapters, console and serial
servers, USB connected products and serial cards. The products included in the embedded
product category include modules, chips, software and development tools, design services,
satellite and single-board computers. The following table provides revenue by product
categories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
100,146 |
|
|
$ |
91,262 |
|
|
$ |
98,442 |
|
Embedded |
|
|
82,402 |
|
|
|
74,666 |
|
|
|
86,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information in the following table provides revenue by the geographic location of the
customer for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
107,347 |
|
|
$ |
90,708 |
|
|
$ |
107,336 |
|
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
47,698 |
|
|
|
56,018 |
|
|
|
52,956 |
|
Asia countries |
|
|
22,742 |
|
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
|
19,672 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, equipment and improvements by geographic location is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
15,015 |
|
|
$ |
15,324 |
|
|
$ |
14,920 |
|
International, primarily Europe |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net property, equipment and improvements |
|
$ |
16,396 |
|
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
$ |
16,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. export sales comprised 34.1%, 32.5% and 34.8% of net sales for the years ended
September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We had one customer whose accounts receivable balance comprised 10.2% of total accounts receivable
at September 30, 2009 for which multiple payments were in transit and received within three
business days of September 30, 2009. No single customer exceeded 10% of accounts receivable or
sales for any other period presented.
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, (in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
24,639 |
|
|
$ |
19,656 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,090 |
|
|
$ |
19,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
21,678 |
|
|
$ |
21,359 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
4,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,550 |
|
|
$ |
26,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
|
10,522 |
|
Improvements |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
Equipment * |
|
|
12,625 |
|
|
|
11,194 |
|
Purchased software |
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
10,788 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,894 |
|
|
|
40,848 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26,498 |
|
|
|
24,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,396 |
|
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Deferred gain on building sale short-term |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability current |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Included in equipment is an immaterial amount under capital leases at September 30, 2010. |
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Our marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. Prior to October 1, 2008, all marketable securities were classified as
held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost, except for a bond issued by Lehman Brothers
(the Lehman Brothers Bond), which was carried at expected realizable value due to an
other-than-temporary impairment recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. We changed
our policy as of October 1, 2008 to account for our marketable securities as
available-for-sale on a prospective basis with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
separate component of stockholders equity. In addition, we reclassified the Lehman Brothers
Bond as available-for-sale and sold this bond in fiscal 2009 and 2010, as discussed further
below.
We analyze our available-for-sale investments for impairment on an ongoing basis. We consider
factors in determining whether an unrealized loss is a temporary loss or an other-than-temporary
loss such as: (a) whether we have the intent to sell the security or (b) whether it is more likely
than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. We also
consider factors such as the length of time and extent to which
the securities have been in an unrealized loss position and the trend of any unrealized losses.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of
$1,014,900 on the Lehman Brothers Bond with a par amount of $1,194,000. The resulting value of
$179,100 for the security became its new cost
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
basis as of September 30, 2008. This other-than-temporary impairment reflected the estimated
decline in the value of this security precipitated by the bankruptcy of the securitys issuer and
was considered a credit loss and thus would remain in retained earnings. The impairment charge was
recorded as a temporary tax difference as we had sufficient capital gains in the available
carryback years to utilize the capital loss that would be realized when the bond is sold. We sold a
portion of the bond in fiscal 2009. The remaining value of the Lehman Brothers Bond as of September
30, 2009 was $134,100. We sold the remainder of the bond in January 2010 for $169,860 and
recognized a gain of $35,760 on this sale during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting the
difference between the remaining value and the selling price.
We obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security, where available, and review
the financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant information from our
investment advisors to estimate the fair value for each security in our investment portfolio. As of
September 30, 2010, eleven of our securities were trading below our amortized cost basis. We
determined each decline in value to be temporary based upon the factors described above. We expect
to realize the fair value of these securities, plus accrued interest, either at the time of
maturity or when the security is sold.
All of our current holdings are classified as available-for-sale marketable securities and are
recorded at fair value on our balance sheet with the unrealized gains and losses recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Our marketable securities at September 30, 2010 were
comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (2) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
26,163 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
26,161 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable securities |
|
$ |
36,627 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
36,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $451. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010 was $18,909. |
Our marketable securities at September 30, 2009 were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (3) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds (2) |
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,254 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
10,025 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
8,023 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable securities |
|
|
22,281 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
22,311 |
|
Non-current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
27,388 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
27,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $264. |
|
(2) |
|
The remaining portion of the Lehman Brothers Bond is included in amortized cost at a fair value
of $134. |
|
(3) |
|
The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2009
was $9,009. |
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the
measurement date. This standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from
independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based upon the best information
available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The hierarchy is broken down into three levels defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and their fair values are
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar
techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
Level 3 also may include certain investment securities for which there is limited market
activity or a decrease in the observability of market pricing for the investments, such
that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. |
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Fair value is applied to financial assets, such as certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and
government municipal bonds, which are classified and accounted for as available-for-sale. These
items are stated at fair value at each reporting period; however, the definition of fair value is
now applied using the above guidance.
The following tables provide information by level for financial assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 using: |
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
Quoted price in |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
value at |
|
|
active markets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
26,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
66,050 |
|
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
36,634 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009 Using: |
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
Quoted price in |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
value at |
|
|
active markets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
33,588 |
|
|
$ |
33,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,183 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
60,962 |
|
|
$ |
33,588 |
|
|
$ |
27,240 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents are measured at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets. We value our Level 2 assets using inputs that are based on market indices of
similar assets within an active market. We have no financial assets valued with Level 3 inputs as
of September 30, 2010 nor have we purchased or sold any Level 3 financial assets during the three
months ended September 30, 2010.
During
fiscal 2010, we reclassified $27.2 million of investments at September 30, 2009 from Level 1 to Level 2. It was
determined that the fair value of such investments is based off of indices and matrices for similar
assets, as defined within Level 2 valuation techniques, and not identical assets, as defined within
Level 1 valuation techniques. Our policy for determining when to recognize transfers between levels
is based on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. This
transfer had no impact on the fair value of our investments as stated in any of the periods
presented. There were no other transfers during fiscal 2010.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances during fiscal
2010 of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis that used significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
Realized gain recorded in other income (expense) |
|
|
36 |
|
Sale of security |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to inherently subjective matters
and changes in future market conditions could result in significantly different estimates of fair
value of our securities, currently and in the future. If market conditions deteriorate, we may
incur impairment charges for securities in our investment portfolio.
8. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from one to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective with regard to
material or workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related
revenue is recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied
to the estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical
warranty incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES (CONTINUED)
accrual. The following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty accrual
for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals for |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Balance at |
|
Warranties |
|
Settlements |
|
Balance at |
year |
|
October 1, |
|
issued |
|
made |
|
September 30, |
2010 |
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
(831 |
) |
|
$ |
877 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
(856 |
) |
|
$ |
970 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
We are not responsible and do not warrant that customer software versions created by original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers based upon our software source code will function in a
particular way, conform to any specifications, or are fit for any particular purpose and we do not
indemnify these customers from any third-party liability as it relates to or arises from any
customization or modifications made by the OEM customer.
9. RESTRUCTURING
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless products
and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring included the closing
of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation and consolidation of the
manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minnetonka, Minnesota headquarters. We paid a
lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in Davis and had vacated the facility as of
the end of fiscal 2009. We continue to maintain non-manufacturing activities at the remaining
leased facility in Davis, California. As a result of these initiatives, during the third quarter
of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0 million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee
termination costs for 86 positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other
relocation costs.
All of the 86 positions were vacated in fiscal 2009. The employee termination costs included
severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement services. The
other restructuring expenses included contract termination fees for non-renewal of lease terms
relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses for employees. A
summary of the restructuring charges and other activity within the restructuring accrual is listed
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
Reversal |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining liability is mostly related to continued medical benefits as part of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), which provides for premium reductions for
health benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA). The ARRA
was amended by the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2010 on December 19, 2009, which
provided an additional six months (from nine to fifteen months) for receiving the subsidy. We
recorded an additional accrual of $0.1 million for the additional six months of continued medical
benefits during the three months ended
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. RESTRUCTURING (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2009. During fiscal 2010, we eliminated $0.5 million of the restructuring accrual
since costs associated with continued medical benefits and relocation were lower than expected. We
expect the remaining liability to be settled by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
10. INCOME TAXES
The components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
7,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
16,648 |
|
International |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,519 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
18,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the income tax provision are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,654 |
|
State |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
(3,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
|
|
(1,983 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
6,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset (liability) at September 30 consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
3,344 |
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
Non-current deferred tax asset |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
$ |
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Uncollectible accounts and other reserves |
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Compensation costs |
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
(5,392 |
) |
|
|
(7,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
$ |
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, we have domestic tax credit carryforwards of $0.2 million the
majority of which will expire in 2013. We also have foreign tax credit carryforwards at September
30, 2010 of $0.1 million, the majority of which will expire in 2013.
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
We have concluded that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized
based on future projected taxable income and the anticipated future reversal of deferred tax
liabilities. The amount of the deferred tax assets actually realized, however, could vary if there
are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or
changes in the amounts of future taxable income. If our future taxable income projections are not
realized, a valuation allowance may be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at
the time that any such change in future taxable income is determined.
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for
the years ended September 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Statutory income tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefits |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Utilization of tax credits |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Manufacturing deduction |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Foreign taxes |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Research and development credit related to 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Adjustment of tax contingency reserves |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Non-deductible stock-based compensation |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of our unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a long-term liability as we do not
expect significant payments or receipts to occur over the next 12 months. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of fiscal year |
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
3,464 |
|
Increases related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year income tax positions |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Current year income tax positions |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Decreases related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year income tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expiration of the statute of limitations |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the effective
tax rate is $2.2 million.
We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. During
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 we recorded a benefit of $0.1 million and in fiscal years
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded an expense of less than $0.1 million and $0.1
million, respectively, of interest and penalties related to income tax matters in the provision for
income taxes. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009 we have accrued interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits of $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively, included in long-term
income taxes payable on our consolidated balance sheet.
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly decrease over the next 12 months due to the lapse of the applicable foreign statute
of limitations. We estimate the range of this change to be between $0.5 million and $0.7 million
in taxes, penalties and interest.
During fiscal 2010, we reversed $2.3 million in income tax reserves associated primarily with the
closing of prior tax years through statute expiration and the conclusion of a federal tax audit.
While the statutes of limitations have not expired, U.S. federal income tax returns for the periods
ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 have been audited by and settled with the Internal
Revenue Service. The aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax
reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 22 percentage points in
fiscal 2010.
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2008, we reversed $0.3 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. We recorded an additional $0.2
million of discrete tax benefits as a result of a filing of a prior year tax return and adjustments
to actual for items reported on the tax returns for fiscal 2007.
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and may result in adjustments to our income tax balances in those years that are material
to our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We are no longer subject to
income tax examination for taxable years prior to fiscal 2009 and 2006 in the case of U.S. federal
and non-U.S. income tax authorities, respectively, and for tax years generally before fiscal 2006,
in the case of state taxing authorities, consisting primarily of Minnesota and California.
At September 30, 2010, we have approximately $6.0 million of accumulated undistributed earnings of
controlled foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely as of such date
pursuant to authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
and corporate joint ventures. Accordingly, no deferred tax has been provided on such earnings. If
the applicable earnings were remitted to us, applicable U.S. federal tax would be substantially
offset by available foreign tax credits.
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based awards are granted under the terms of the 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan as amended and
restated as of December 4, 2009 (the Omnibus Plan), as well as our Stock Option Plan as
amended and restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Stock Option Plan) and Non-Officer Stock
Option Plan as amended and restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Non-Officer Plan), both of
which expired during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 (the Plans). Additional awards cannot
be made under the Stock Option Plan or the Non-Officer Plan. The authority to grant options
under the Omnibus Plan and set other terms and conditions rests with the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors.
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
The Stock Option Plan and the Non-Officer Plan include nonstatutory stock options (NSOs) and
the Stock Option Plan also includes incentive stock options (ISOs) to employees and others who
provide services to us, including consultants, advisers and directors. Options granted under
these plans generally vest over a four year service period and will expire if unexercised
after ten years from the date of grant. Share awards vest upon continued employment. The
exercise price for ISOs and non-employee director options granted under the Stock Option Plan
was set at the fair market value of our common stock based on the closing price on the date of
grant. The exercise price for NSOs granted under the Stock Option Plan or the Non-Officer
Plan was set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and was set to the
exercise price based on the closing price on the date of grant.
The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 5,750,000 common shares in connection with awards
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance units or stock awards.
Eligible participants include our employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors.
Awards may be granted under the Omnibus Plan until December 4, 2019 as an authorization to issue an
additional 2,500,000 common shares was ratified on January 25, 2010 at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Options under the Omnibus Plan can be granted as either ISOs or NSOs. The exercise
price shall be determined by our Compensation Committee but shall not be less than the fair market
value of our common stock based on the closing price on the date of grant.
Additionally, we have outstanding stock options under various plans assumed in connection with
our prior acquisition of NetSilicon, Inc. (the Assumed Plans). Additional awards cannot be
made by us under the Assumed Plans.
We recorded cash received from the exercise of stock options of $1.7 million, $0.4 million and $1.7
million during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation were immaterial during fiscal 2010 and were $0.1 million and $0.2 million
during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Upon exercise, we issue new shares of stock. The Plans
have provisions allowing employees to elect to pay their withholding obligation through share
reduction. No employees elected to pay income tax withholding obligations through share reduction
during fiscal 2010, 2009 or 2008.
Also, we sponsor an Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended and restated as of December 4, 2009 and
November 27, 2006 (the Purchase Plan), covering all domestic employees with at least 90 days of
continuous service and who are customarily employed at least 20 hours per week. The Purchase Plan
allows eligible participants the right to purchase common stock on a quarterly basis at the lower
of 85% of the market price at the beginning or end of each three-month offering period. The
Purchase Plan was recently ratified on January 25, 2010 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
increase the number of shares reserved for future purchases to the Purchase Plan by 250,000 shares
bringing the total number of shares to 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock that may be purchased
under the plan. Employee contributions to the Purchase Plan were $0.9 million in the fiscal year
ending 2010 and $1.0 million each in the fiscal years ended 2009 and 2008. Pursuant to the
Purchase Plan, 124,087, 145,316, and 117,162 common shares were issued to employees during the
fiscal years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Shares are issued under the Purchase Plan
from treasury stock. As of September 30, 2010, 427,442 common shares were available for future
issuances under the Purchase Plan.
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
Stock-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated results of operations as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation before income taxes |
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation after income taxes |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
$ |
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory was immaterial as of September
30, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
A summary of options and common shares reserved for grant under the Plans and Assumed Plans are as
follows (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Shares approved for
grant |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
9.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
13.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
$ |
10.34 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
$ |
10.86 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on our
closing stock price of $9.49 as of September 30, 2010, which would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. |
The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock
exceeds its exercise price. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during each of the
twelve months ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0.6 million, $0.2 million and $0.9
million, respectively.
The table below shows the weighted average fair value, which was determined based upon the fair
value of each option on the grant date utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the
related assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fair value of options granted (in thousands) |
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
Weighted average per option grant date fair value |
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
Assumptions used for option grants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
1.86% - 2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.57% - 2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.53% - 3.41 |
% |
Expected term |
|
4.5 - 5 years |
|
4.5 - 5 years |
|
4 - 5 years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
43% - 45 |
% |
|
|
41% - 45 |
% |
|
|
36% - 45 |
% |
Weighted average volatility |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
The fair value of each option award granted during the periods presented was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table above. Expected
volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our stock. We use historical data to
estimate option exercise and employee termination information within the valuation model; separate
groups of grantees that have similar historical exercise behaviors are considered separately for
valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the vesting period and
historical information and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free rate used is the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond rate in effect at the
time of the grant whose maturity equals the expected term of the option.
A summary of our non-vested options as of September 30, 2010 and changes during the twelve months
then ended is presented below (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair Value per |
|
|
Options |
|
Common Share |
Nonvested at September
30, 2009 |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
$ |
3.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
3.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September
30, 2010 |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeiture rates. The pre-vesting forfeiture
rate used in fiscal 2010 was 2.0%. As of September 30, 2010 the total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements, net of expected forfeitures, was
$4.7 million and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is
approximately 2.5 years.
At September 30, 2010, the weighted average exercise price and remaining life of the stock options
are as follows (in thousands, except remaining life and exercise price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
Range of |
|
Options |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Average |
|
Shares |
|
Average |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
( In Years) |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Vested |
|
Exercise Price |
|
$2.19 - $6.00 |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
4.32 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
$ |
4.32 |
|
$6.01 - $8.00 |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
$ |
7.31 |
|
$8.01 - $9.00 |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
8.70 |
|
|
$ |
8.23 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
$ |
8.40 |
|
$9.01 - $11.00 |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
$ |
10.19 |
|
$11.01 - $13.00 |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
$ |
12.52 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
$ |
12.53 |
|
$13.01 - $14.00 |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
$ |
13.42 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
$ |
13.42 |
|
$14.01 - $15.00 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
$ |
14.72 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
$ |
14.73 |
|
$15.01 - $16.88 |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.19 - $16.88 |
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
$ |
10.34 |
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
$ |
10.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2010 was $2.9 million, $3.2 million
in fiscal 2009 and $3.4 million in fiscal 2008.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. SALE AND LEASEBACK OF BUILDING
On February 18, 2008, we entered into a contract for the sale of our building in Dortmund,
Germany, and subsequent partial leaseback for a five year term (the Agreement). Upon the
closing of the transaction in March 2008, we initiated the leaseback of approximately 40% of
the property for a period of five years, with a renewal option for an additional five years.
The building was sold for 4.5 million Euros (equivalent to $6.9 million), resulting in a gain
on sale of 1.0 million Euros ($1.6 million). As a result of the leaseback, $1.5 million of
the gain on the sale was deferred and is being recognized ratably over the lease term as an
offset to rent expense. The remaining $0.1 million was recognized in the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 as a component of general and administrative expense. Of the total sale price,
4.2 million Euros ($6.5 million) was received during March 2008 and the remaining 0.3 million
Euros ($0.4 million) was received in April 2008. We were required, as part of the Agreement,
to deposit 0.3 million Euros ($0.4 million) into an interest-bearing bank account, which will
be refunded to us at the end of the lease term. This deposit was made during March 2008 and
is included as restricted cash in other noncurrent assets on our consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 2010 and 2009.
The lease expires in 2013 with future minimum payments as follows: In years 2011 through 2012
our yearly minimum lease payment is $0.4 million each year. In 2013, our minimum lease
payment will be $0.2 million.
13. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE
Our Board of Directors has authorized 1,500,000 shares of our common stock for repurchase. During
fiscal 2008, we began to repurchase our common stock and purchased 471,200 shares for $5.1 million.
During fiscal 2009, we purchased an additional 893,162 shares for $6.6 million. We did not
repurchase any of our stock during fiscal 2010. As of September 30, 2010, 135,638 shares remain
available for repurchase.
14. SHARE RIGHTS PLAN
Under our share rights plan, each right entitles its holder to buy one one-hundredth of a share of
a Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $60, subject to adjustment.
The rights are not exercisable until a specified distribution date as defined in the Share Rights
Agreement. The Rights will expire on June 30, 2018, unless extended or earlier redeemed or
exchanged by us as defined in the Share Rights Agreement.
15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We currently have a savings and profit sharing plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the Code), whereby eligible employees may contribute up to 25% of their pre-tax
earnings, not to exceed amounts allowed under the Code.
We provide a match of 100% on the first 3% of each employees bi-weekly contribution and a 50%
match on the next 2% of each employees bi-weekly contribution. In addition, we may make
contributions to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. We provided
matching contributions of $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million in the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. COMMITMENTS
We have entered into various operating lease agreements for office facilities and equipment, the
last of which expires in fiscal 2017. The office facility leases generally require us to pay a
pro-rata share of the lessors operating expenses. Certain operating leases contain escalation
clauses and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The following schedule reflects future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating
leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,172 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,344 |
|
2014 |
|
|
723 |
|
2015 |
|
|
499 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required |
|
$ |
7,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule shows the composition of total rental expense for all operating leases
for the years ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Rentals |
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
Less: sublease rentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. CONTINGENCIES
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
There have been no additional developments in In re Initial Public Offering Securities
Litigation since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009. Under
the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us, and we
would bear no financial liability beyond our deductible of $250,000. While there can be no
guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our liability
insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the applicable
deductible amount of $250,000 per claim. As of September 30, 2010, we have an accrued liability
for the anticipated settlement of $300,000 which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of
loss that is probable and a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000, which
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less our $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, such losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
On June 18, 2010 and June 24, 2010, respectively, two shareholders filed derivative actions against
our directors, our former Chief Financial Officer, and another executive officer, in the Hennepin
County District Court, State of Minnesota, in Minneapolis. We also were named as a nominal
defendant in the actions. The complaints alleged that the individual defendants caused us to
operate in countries with dubious business practices without having internal controls or an
accounting system that were adequate to ensure that we did not violate the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. The complaints alleged causes of action against the individual defendants for (1)
breach of fiduciary duty, (2) waste of corporate assets, and (3) unjust enrichment. The complaints
sought to recover, purportedly on our behalf, unspecified damages, equitable relief, attorneys
fees, and costs of litigation. On August 2, 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss these lawsuits. On
August 16, 2010, the derivative actions were dismissed without prejudice.
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
17. CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On May 11, 2010, SIPCO, LLC filed a patent infringement lawsuit against us in federal court in the
Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuit included allegations against Digi and five other companies
pertaining to the infringement of SIPCOs patents by wireless mesh networking products. The
lawsuit seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter at
this time or whether it will have a materially adverse impact on our business prospects and our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
In addition to the matters discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
18. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
Sept. 30 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
42,968 |
|
|
$ |
45,076 |
|
|
$ |
47,238 |
|
|
$ |
47,266 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,713 |
|
|
|
22,748 |
|
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
|
24,030 |
|
Net income (1)(2)(3) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
41,361 |
|
|
$ |
40,085 |
|
|
$ |
44,470 |
|
|
$ |
40,012 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,248 |
|
|
|
19,169 |
|
|
|
21,437 |
|
|
|
19,411 |
|
Net income (1)(2) |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2010 and 2009, we recorded discrete income tax benefits of $2.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Discrete
income tax benefits for fiscal 2010 were recorded of $0.1 million in the first quarter and $2.2 million in the third quarter
related to the reversal of tax reserves primarily due to the closure of prior tax years through statute expiration and audit.
Discrete income tax benefits for fiscal 2009 were recorded of $0.4 million in the first quarter, $0.5 million in the third quarter
and $0.3 million in the fourth quarter related to the reversal of previously established income tax reserves, the resolution of
of certain state tax matters and the closing of a prior tax year. |
|
(2) |
|
We reversed a business restructuring accrual of $0.4 million ($0.2 million after tax) in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
$0.1 million ($0.1 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded the
business restructuring charge of $2.0 million ($1.3 million after tax). |
|
(3) |
|
We incurred expenses related to the investigation (see Note 19) and recorded $1.1 million ($0.7 million after tax) in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 and $0.3 million ($0.2 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. |
71
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
19. INVESTIGATION
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we received allegations regarding possible violations of
our gifts, travel and entertainment policy for activities in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region by a
few employees. We initiated an investigation of these policy and corresponding internal control
issues, and any possible related violations of applicable law, including the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA). We voluntarily disclosed the allegations to the United States Department of
Justice (DOJ) and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The investigation
was under the direction of the Audit Committee, comprised solely of independent directors,
utilizing outside counsel, and focused on the APAC region. For completeness purposes, the
investigation reviewed certain other foreign regions where no allegations had been made. We
provided the DOJ and SEC with updates and our proposed remediation plan.
We announced on August 2, 2010 that we received confirmation through discussions with
representatives of the DOJ and the SEC that they would not be initiating any enforcement
proceedings against Digi, including not seeking any monetary or other sanctions.
The investigation identified violations of company policy that primarily involved three individuals
in Hong Kong and our former Chief Financial Officer. The investigation also found an
unsubstantiated accrued liability recorded in Hong Kong. All four individuals were terminated or
had resigned from the company as of May 12, 2010. While we determined that no adjustment was
required to our previously reported consolidated financial statements, we recorded an immaterial
out-of-period adjustment during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 in order to correct the
unsubstantiated accrued liability in Hong Kong.
Based upon what we learned from the investigation, we have and are further strengthening our
monitoring controls over foreign locations and other operational and regulatory compliance
procedures, including retention of third party assistance to enhance our controls. We incurred
general and administrative expense of $1.4 million related to the cost of the investigation and
remediation during fiscal 2010.
72
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and acting principal
financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this
evaluation, the principal executive officer and acting principal financial officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,
2010 using the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment,
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
September 30, 2010. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2010 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 8 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with
the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Investigation in Hong Kong
The previously announced investigation, which was the result of allegations that we learned of in
April 2010, was completed in July 2010 (refer to Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements
for more detail). Soon after learning of these allegations, we began to take immediate remedial
actions. The investigation identified violations of our gifts, travel and entertainment policy
that primarily involved three individuals in Hong Kong and our former Chief Financial Officer. The
investigation also found an unsubstantiated accrued liability recorded in Hong Kong. All four
individuals were terminated or had resigned from the company as of May 12, 2010.
As a result of the allegations and the ultimate findings of the investigation, we performed an
evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting during the third fiscal quarter of
2010 to consider the implications of these findings. We identified deficiencies in the design of
the internal reporting structure in Hong Kong, as well as deficiencies in the design of certain
controls in Hong Kong, including expense reviews, cash controls, review of Hong Kong financial
information and account reconciliations in both Hong Kong and the corporate office, and in the
competency of those performing financial accounting and reporting activities in Hong Kong. These
deficiencies allowed inappropriate activities, such as those that ultimately led to the
investigation and
73
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (CONTINUED) |
terminations and resignation noted above, to not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We
have determined based on a review of the internal reporting structure and controls at Hong Kong in
comparison to our other locations that these issues were unique to the Hong Kong entity and that
the Companys other entities had controls in place that were operating and effective. While we
determined that no adjustment was required to our previously reported consolidated financial
statements, we determined that the aggregation of these control deficiencies, combined with the
influence and span of control of our former Chief Financial Officer in the Hong Kong region and
collusion on the part of the individuals involved, resulted in a material weakness in the Companys
control environment. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in
internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected on a timely basis. The control deficiencies at Digi could have resulted in a material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements that would not have been prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
We determined that this material weakness was remediated during the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.
On November 23, 2010, our Board of Directors amended and restated the companys By-Laws, as
previously amended and restated (the By-Laws) to clarify certain provisions regarding a
stockholders notice of business to be conducted or notice of director nominations to be made at an
annual meeting. The amendments are effective as of November 23, 2010.
As a result of the amendments, the deadlines for such notices set forth in Sections 2.02(a), with
respect to stockholders notices of business to be conducted, and 3.13(a), with respect to
stockholders notices of director nominations to be made, have also been adjusted and clarified.
In order to be timely any such stockholders notice must be delivered to our Secretary not less
than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date of the preceding years annual meeting of
stockholders. If, however, the date of the meeting is more than 30 days before or 60 days after
such anniversary date, the notice will be timely only if delivered not less than 120 days before
the meeting or, if later, within 10 days after the first public announcement of the date of the
annual meeting. Section 3.13(a) further provides that, in the case of a special meeting of
stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, a stockholders notice of director
nominations to be made at that meeting will be timely if delivered to our Secretary within ten days
after the first public announcement of the date of such special meeting.
Both Section 2.02(b) and Section 3.13(b) have been amended to further clarify the securities and
related agreements that must be set forth on a stockholders notice. Those items are, with respect
to the stockholder and any beneficial owner(s) identified in the notice: (A) the number of shares
of our stock of each class or series that is beneficially owned, (B) any option, warrant,
convertible security, stock appreciation right, swap, or similar right with an exercise or
conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series
of shares of our stock or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or
series of shares of our stock (a Derivative Instrument) and any other opportunity to profit or
share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of our shares, (C) any
proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which such stockholder or
any such beneficial owner has a right to vote any shares, (D) any short interest in any Digi
security, (E) any rights to dividends on our shares that are separated or separable from the
underlying shares of our stock, (F) any proportionate interest in shares of our stock or Derivative
Instruments held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such
stockholder or any such beneficial owner is a general partner or, directly or indirectly,
beneficially owns an interest in a general partner and (G) any performance-related fees that such
stockholder or any such beneficial
74
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED) |
owner is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of shares of our stock or
Derivative Instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice.
Section 2.02(b), as amended, requires that a stockholders notice of business to be conducted at an
annual meeting set forth (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the
meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, (ii) the name and address, as
they appear on the our books, of the stockholder proposing such business and the name and address
of any beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposal is made, (iii) securities and related
agreements disclosure discussed above, (iv) any material interest in such business of the
stockholder or any such beneficial owner, and (v) a representation and other appropriate evidence
that the stockholder is a holder of record of shares of stock entitled to vote on such business at
the meeting, will continue to be a holder of record of shares of stock entitled to vote on such
business through the date of the meeting, and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the
meeting to make the proposal.
Section 3.13(b), as amended, requires that a stockholders notice of director nominations to be
made at an annual meeting of stockholders set forth, as to each person whom the stockholder
proposes to nominate for election as a director: (i) such persons name, (ii) all information
relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election
of directors in an election contest, or that is otherwise required, pursuant to Regulation 14A
under the Exchange Act, and (iii) such persons signed written consent to being a nominee and to
serving as a director if elected. As to the stockholder giving the notice, Section 3.13(b), as
amended, further requires (i) the name and address, as they appear on our books, of such
stockholder and the name and address of any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is
made, (ii) securities and related agreements disclosure discussed above, (iii) a description of any
material relationships, including financial transactions and compensation, between the stockholder
and the proposed nominee(s), and (iv) a representation and other appropriate evidence that the
stockholder is a holder of record of shares of our stock entitled to vote for the election of
directors, will continue to be a holder of record of shares of stock entitled to vote for the
election of directors through the date of the meeting, and intends to appear in person or by proxy
at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice.
In addition to certain other technical and conforming amendments to Sections 2.02 and 3.13 of the
By-Laws, Section 2.04 was amended to permit delivery of notice of a meeting of stockholders by
delivering a separate written notice of the posting of such information on an electronic network.
The foregoing summary of the amendments is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of
the amended and restated By-Laws, which is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit
3(b) and is incorporated herein by reference.
75
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the headings Proposal
No. 1 Election of Directors and Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management
in our Proxy Statement.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
As of the date of filing this Form 10-K, the following individuals were executive officers of the
Registrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brenda L. Mueller
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Acting Principal Financial Officer, Acting Principal
Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence A. Kraft
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joel K. Young
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of Research and Development
and Chief Technical Officer |
Mr. Dunsmore joined our company in October 1999 as President and Chief Executive Officer and a
member of the Board of Directors and was elected Chairman of the Board in May 2000. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Dunsmore was Vice President of Access for Lucent Microelectronics, a
telecommunications company now known as Agere Systems Inc., since June 1999. From October 1998 to
June 1999, he acted as an independent consultant to various high technology companies. From
February 1998 to October 1998, Mr. Dunsmore was Chief Executive Officer of NetFax, Inc., a
telecommunications company. From October 1995 to February 1998, he held executive management
positions at US Robotics and then at 3COM after 3COM acquired US Robotics in June 1997. Prior to
that, Mr. Dunsmore held various marketing management positions at AT&T Paradyne Corporation from
May 1983 to October 1995. Mr. Dunsmore is also a director of Analysts International Corporation.
Brenda L. Mueller, our companys Corporate Controller, was elected by our Board of Directors on May
7, 2010, as Acting Principal Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer, effective
the same day. Ms. Mueller joined our company as Corporate Controller in March 2000. Prior to
joining us, Ms. Mueller served as Director, General Accounting and Finance Services at Novartis
Nutrition Corporation, then a privately-held division of Novartis AG, for 15 years and was
primarily responsible for accounting and financial reporting and financial management.
Mr. Kraft joined our company as Vice President of Americas Sales and Marketing in February 2003 and
was named Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing in November 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr.
Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for Advanced Switching Communications (ASC), a provider of
broadband access platforms, from June 1999 to February 2002. From July 1998 to October 1998, Mr.
Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for NetFax, Inc., a telecommunications company. Mr. Kraft
also previously held the positions of Manager of Product Marketing at 3COM/U.S. Robotics, Vice
President of Marketing for ISDN Systems Corporation, and Group Products Manager for the Internet
access program at Sprint Corporation.
Mr. Young joined our company in July 2000 as Vice President of Engineering and was named Vice
President of Research and Development and Chief Technical Officer in November 2005. In October
2006, Mr. Young was named Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Technical
Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Young served as a Vice President for Transcrypt International, a
provider of encryption products, in various
76
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED) |
engineering, sales and marketing positions from February 1996 to June 2000. Before that, he held
various engineering and management positions at AT&T and AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1986 to 1996.
On November 15, 2010, our Board of Directors elected Steven E. Snyder to serve as the companys
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective upon his commencement of
employment, which is expected to be November 30, 2010.
Mr. Snyder, age 54, most recently served as Chief Financial Officer at Gearworks, Inc. from
November 2008 to September 2009. In August 2009, Gearworks, Inc. merged with Xora, Inc. From
October 2007 to June 2008, he was a General Manager of the storage solutions group at Xiotech
Corporation, a privately held data storage company. From January 2003 to October 2007, he served
as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President manufacturing and administration at Xiotech
Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Snyder served as Chief Financial Officer at several companies,
including Ancor Communications, Inc., then a publicly traded developer and manufacturer of fibre
channel switching products for data center networks. Mr. Snyder also spent ten years at Cray
Research, Inc. in progressively responsible financial roles. Earlier roles include seven years in
various financial positions at Control Data Corporation and two years with KPMG Peat Marwick.
Code of Ethics
We have in place a code of ethics within the meaning of Rule 406 of Regulation S-K, which is
applicable to our senior financial management, including specifically our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and controller. A copy of this code of ethics is included as
an exhibit to this report. We intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations regarding any amendment
to, or a waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website
at www.digi.com. We also have a code of conduct that applies to all directors, officers and
employees, a copy of which is available through our website (www.digi.com) under the About us
Investor Relations Corporate Governance caption.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the heading
Compensation of Directors, Executive Compensation, the information regarding compensation
committee interlocks and insider participation under the heading Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors on our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the headings Security
Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information in
our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information regarding director independence under
the heading Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors and the information regarding related person
transactions under the heading Related Person Transaction Approval Policy on our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information under Proposal No. 2 Ratification
of Independent Public Accounting Firm in our Proxy Statement.
77
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
|
(a) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules of the Company (filed as part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K) |
|
1. |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
2. |
|
Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
3. |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2(a)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among Digi International Limited,
a subsidiary of Digi International Inc., and all of the shareholders of Sarian
Systems Limited (excluding schedules and exhibits which the Registrant agrees to
furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request)
(1) |
|
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (2) |
|
|
|
3(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company |
|
|
|
4(a)
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the Company and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (3) |
|
|
|
4(b)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences
and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares (4) |
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated as of November
27, 2006* (5) |
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors and officers of the Company* (6) |
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Subramanian Krishnan dated March 26, 1999* (7) |
|
|
|
10(c)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Subramanian Krishnan dated
February 5, 2001* (8) |
|
|
|
10(d)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Joseph T. Dunsmore dated September
27, 2006* (9) |
|
|
|
10(e)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated as
of December 4, 2009* (10) |
78
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED) |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10(f)
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of
December 4, 2009* (11) |
|
|
|
10(g)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, as Amended and Restated
as of November 27, 2006 (12) |
|
|
|
10(h)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Director Stock Option Plan (13) |
|
|
|
10(i)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock
Option Plan (14) |
|
|
|
10(j)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (15) |
|
|
|
10(k)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (for grants under
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan)* (16) |
|
|
|
10(l)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft, dated February 4, 2003* (17) |
|
|
|
10(l)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft dated July 30,
2007* (18) |
|
|
|
10(m)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Joel K. Young dated July 30, 2007* (19) |
|
|
|
10(n)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (for grants under
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan before January 26, 2010)* (20) |
|
|
|
10(o)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (amended form for
grants under Digi International Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan on or after January 26,
2010)* (21) |
|
|
|
10(p)
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback Agreement dated February 18, 2008
between Digi International GmbH and Deutsche Structured Finance GmbH & Co.
Alphard KG. (22) |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics (23) |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this
Form 10-K. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 1993 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
79
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED) |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2010 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999 (File no. 0-17972) |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e)(i) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2000 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82672). |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82670). |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82668). |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004
(File no. 0-17972). |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2003 (File no. 0-17972). |
80
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
November 29, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2010 |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2010 |
/s/ Brenda L. Mueller
|
|
|
Brenda L. Mueller |
|
|
Corporate Controller and Acting Principal Financial Officer
(Acting Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
GUY C. JACKSON |
|
|
KENNETH E. MILLARD |
|
|
AHMED NAWAZ
|
|
A majority of the Board of Directors* |
WILLIAM N. PRIESMEYER |
|
|
BRADLEY J. WILLIAMS |
|
|
* Joseph T. Dunsmore, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this document on behalf of each
of the above named directors of the Registrant pursuant to Powers of Attorney duly executed by such
persons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2010 |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
Attorney-in-fact |
|
81
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(Decrease) to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
beginning |
|
costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
end of |
Description |
|
of period |
|
expenses |
|
Deductions |
|
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation account doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
(1) |
|
$ |
549 |
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
72 |
(1) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
(1) |
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
(264 |
) |
|
$ |
47 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts charged against allowance, net of recoveries |
|
(2) |
|
Adjustments and recoveries |
82
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
2(e)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among
Digi International Limited, a subsidiary of Digi
International Inc., and all of the shareholders of
Sarian Systems Limited (excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, as amended
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
4(a)
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008,
between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Rights Agent
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4(b)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers,
Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Shares
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan as Amended
and Restated as of November 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors and
officers of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Subramanian
Krishnan dated March 26, 1999
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and
Subramanian Krishnan dated February 5, 2001
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(d)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Joseph
T. Dunsmore dated September 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, as amended and restated as of December 4, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(f)
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, as
amended and restated as of December 4, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Non-Officer Stock Option
Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 27,
2006
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(h)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Director
Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(i)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive
and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(j)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(k)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option
Agreement (for grants under Digi International Inc.
Stock Option Plan)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(l)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft,
dated February 4, 2003
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(l)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and
Lawrence A. Kraft dated July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(m)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Joel K. Young
dated July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
83
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
10(n)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (for grants under Digi International Inc.
2000 Omnibus Stock Plan before January 26, 2010)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(o)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option
Agreement (amended form for grants under Digi
International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan on or
after January 26, 2010)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(p)
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback
Agreement dated February 18, 2008 between Digi
International GmbH and Deutsche Structured Finance
GmbH & Co. Alphard KG.
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
Filed Electronically |
84