e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarter ended: October 1, 2011
Commission File Number: 1-14041
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2882273
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
400 Wood Road, Braintree, MA 02184
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (781) 848-7100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to
the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
The number of shares of $.01 par value common stock outstanding as of October 1, 2011:
24,981,455
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
INDEX
2
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
179,445 |
|
|
$ |
166,833 |
|
|
$ |
350,014 |
|
|
$ |
329,872 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
89,496 |
|
|
|
79,078 |
|
|
|
171,316 |
|
|
|
155,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
89,949 |
|
|
|
87,755 |
|
|
|
178,698 |
|
|
|
174,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
10,350 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
18,959 |
|
|
|
15,875 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
62,613 |
|
|
|
52,790 |
|
|
|
118,844 |
|
|
|
107,144 |
|
Contingent consideration income |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
71,383 |
|
|
|
58,850 |
|
|
|
136,223 |
|
|
|
121,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
18,566 |
|
|
|
28,905 |
|
|
|
42,475 |
|
|
|
53,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes |
|
|
19,011 |
|
|
|
29,159 |
|
|
|
42,705 |
|
|
|
53,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
7,821 |
|
|
|
11,877 |
|
|
|
14,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share assuming
dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,418 |
|
|
|
24,686 |
|
|
|
25,575 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,843 |
|
|
|
25,228 |
|
|
|
26,029 |
|
|
|
25,459 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
183,421 |
|
|
$ |
196,707 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,283 at October 1, 2011
and $1,799 at April 2, 2011 |
|
|
129,242 |
|
|
|
127,166 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
101,444 |
|
|
|
84,387 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
9,674 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
17,203 |
|
|
|
30,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
441,100 |
|
|
|
448,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building, and building improvements |
|
|
55,127 |
|
|
|
52,359 |
|
Plant equipment and machinery |
|
|
132,124 |
|
|
|
128,612 |
|
Office equipment and information technology |
|
|
85,347 |
|
|
|
83,258 |
|
Haemonetics equipment |
|
|
217,471 |
|
|
|
211,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
490,069 |
|
|
|
475,684 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(333,203 |
) |
|
|
(320,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
156,866 |
|
|
|
155,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, less amortization of $49,320 at October 1, 2011
and $43,827 at April 2, 2011 |
|
|
98,847 |
|
|
|
101,789 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
115,582 |
|
|
|
115,367 |
|
Deferred tax asset, long term |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
9,974 |
|
|
|
10,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
225,756 |
|
|
|
228,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
823,722 |
|
|
$ |
833,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
29,759 |
|
|
|
28,323 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
26,780 |
|
|
|
27,039 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
6,033 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
45,703 |
|
|
|
46,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
110,806 |
|
|
|
108,671 |
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
18,005 |
|
|
|
18,669 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,302 |
|
|
|
15,822 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; Authorized 150,000,000 shares; Issued
and outstanding 24,981,455 shares at October 1, 2011 and 25,660,393
shares at April 2, 2011 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
304,517 |
|
|
|
302,709 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
364,726 |
|
|
|
373,630 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
8,785 |
|
|
|
9,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
678,277 |
|
|
|
686,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
823,722 |
|
|
$ |
833,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,619 |
|
|
|
24,690 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
Loss on sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Unrealized loss from hedging activities |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
Contingent consideration income |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
Reversal of interest expense on contingent consideration |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
(493 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(1,332 |
) |
|
|
(837 |
) |
Increase in inventories |
|
|
(15,390 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
Decrease in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
12,283 |
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
Increase in other assets and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
(3,727 |
) |
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,059 |
) |
|
|
(22,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
52,539 |
|
|
|
44,286 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(23,843 |
) |
|
|
(24,088 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(23,713 |
) |
|
|
(23,826 |
) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term loans |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
(5,249 |
) |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
Share repurchase |
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(41,753 |
) |
|
|
(47,301 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(13,286 |
) |
|
|
(26,513 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
196,707 |
|
|
|
141,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
183,421 |
|
|
$ |
115,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placements
of Haemonetics equipment |
|
$ |
6,292 |
|
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
2,288 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year
balances to conform to the presentation of the financial statements for the six months ended
October 1, 2011. Operating results for the six month period ended October 1, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending March
31, 2012, or any other interim period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in
our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011.
The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to
the issuance of the financial statements to provide additional evidence relative to certain
estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. Subsequent events have been
evaluated, and these financial statements reflect those material items that arose after the balance
sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements that would be considered
recognized subsequent events. There were no material recognized subsequent events recorded in the
October 1, 2011 consolidated financial statements.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal years 2012 and 2011
include 52 weeks with all four quarters each having 13 weeks.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP
and IFRSs.
Update No. 2011-04 updates the accounting guidance related to fair value measurements that results
in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure
about fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The
updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
Early application is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of Update No.
2011-04 on our consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective for our fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2012.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Update No. 2011-05 updates the disclosure requirements
for comprehensive income to include total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and
the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not
affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The updated guidance is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should
be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted and amendments do not require any
transition disclosures. This statement is effective in our first quarter of fiscal year 2013.
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350). ASU 2011-08 allows entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is
necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes, as a result of
its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test is required.
An entity has the unconditional option to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to
performing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company anticipates that the
adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
and footnote disclosures.
6
Standards Implemented
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, and Accounting Standards Update No.
2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software (the Updates). The Updates provide guidance on arrangements
that include software elements, including tangible products that have software components that are
essential to the functionality of the tangible product and will no longer be within the scope of
the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products that will now be subject
to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The Updates also provide authoritative guidance on
revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue
recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific objective evidence or third
party evidence of fair value for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to allocate arrangement consideration using the relative
selling price method. The Updates also include new disclosure requirements on how the application
of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. On
April 3, 2011, the Company adopted this guidance, which did not have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-29, Business Combinations
(Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. Update
No. 2010-29 clarifies paragraph 805-10-50-2(h) to require public entities that enter into business
combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis to disclose pro forma
information for such business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period, including
pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the acquisition date had been as of
the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. We did not complete any
material business acquisitions during the six months ended October 1, 2011 thus the disclosure
requirements were not applicable for the period.
7
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and
diluted earnings per share computations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by weighted
average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the effect of potentially dilutive common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
25,418 |
|
|
|
24,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
25,418 |
|
|
|
24,686 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
25,843 |
|
|
|
25,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
25,575 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
25,575 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
26,029 |
|
|
|
25,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of 0.4 million and
1.1 million stock options for the second quarter of fiscal year 2012 and 2011, respectively, 0.4
million and 0.8 million stock options for the first six months of fiscal year 2012 and 2011,
respectively, because these securities were anti-dilutive during the noted periods.
8
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense of $4.7 million and $4.1 million was recognized for the six months
ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized
was $1.3 million for the six months ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010.
The weighted average fair value for our options granted in the first six months of fiscal year 2012
and 2011 was $18.27 and $16.89, respectively. The assumptions utilized for estimating the fair
value of option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
Stock Options Black-Scholes assumptions (weighted average): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
27.42 |
% |
|
|
28.33 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
During the six months ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, there were 41,067 and 35,992
shares, respectively, purchased under the ESPP. They were purchased at $46.80 and $45.70
per share, respectively, under the ESPP.
5. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
We generally provide a warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of
each device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We
estimate our potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience, and we
periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual and make adjustments as necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
Warranty provision |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Warranty spending |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period |
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes in stockholders
equity. Other non-owner changes are primarily foreign currency translation, the change in our net
minimum pension liability, and the changes in fair value of the effective portion of our
outstanding cash flow hedge contracts.
A summary of the components of other comprehensive income is as follows:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in minimum pension liability, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(2,447 |
) |
|
|
7,481 |
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
(4,519 |
) |
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge
losses, net of tax |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
11,126 |
|
|
$ |
24,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in minimum pension liability, net of tax |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
3,234 |
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(2,889 |
) |
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge
losses, net of tax |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
|
$ |
38,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and
manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
35,333 |
|
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
61,810 |
|
|
|
53,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,444 |
|
|
$ |
84,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. For the six months ended October 1, 2011,
approximately 51% of our sales are generated outside the U.S. generally in local currencies. We
also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local
currency. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in
foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, our reporting currency.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for
a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange
rates. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from
transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to a
lesser extent the Swiss Franc, British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. This does not
eliminate the volatility of
foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates
are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.
10
Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011 were
cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We record the effective portion of
any change in the fair value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in Other Comprehensive
Income in the Statement of Stockholders Equity until the related third-party transaction occurs.
Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related
gain or loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the
hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we
would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that
time. We had designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of
$153.6 million as of October 1, 2011 and $154.8 million as of April 2, 2011.
During the six months ended October 1, 2011, we recognized net losses of $2.9 million in earnings
on our cash flow hedges. For the six months ended October 1, 2011, $2.9 million of losses, net of
tax, were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to recognize the effective portion of
the fair value of any designated foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were,
designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, as compared to net losses of $4.1 million as of
October 2, 2010. At October 1, 2011, losses of $2.9 million, net of tax, may be reclassified to
earnings within the next twelve months. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of October 1,
2011 mature within twelve months.
Non-designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of
offsetting transactions and balances. We use foreign currency forward contracts as a part of our
strategy to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and
liabilities. These foreign currency forward contracts are entered into for periods consistent with
currency transaction exposures, generally one month. They are not designated as cash flow or fair
value hedges under ASC Topic 815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in
fair value recorded to earnings. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under ASC
Topic 815 outstanding in the contract amount of $48.2 million as of October 1, 2011 and $45.9
million as of April 2, 2011.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges and those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated
statement of income for the six months ended October 1, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
from AOCI into |
|
|
Location in |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
in AOCI |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Statement of |
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Statement of |
Derivative Instruments |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Operations |
|
Testing (*) |
|
|
Operations |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
$ |
(2,889 |
) |
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
Net revenues, COGS, and SG&A |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
Other income |
Non-designated foreign currency hedge
contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,889 |
) |
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our
effectiveness testing.
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of October 1, 2011
or April 2, 2011.
ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as either
assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative
instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these
instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency
exchange rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for
liabilities. In certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value.
Generally, we use inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active; other observable inputs for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally from, or
corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of October 1, 2011, we
have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value
11
hierarchy
prescribed by ASC Topic 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for
substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our
consolidated balance sheets as of October 1, 2011 by type of contract and whether it is a
qualifying hedge under ASC Topic 815.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in |
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies
to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance
with ASC Topic 820, for the quarter and the six months ended October 1, 2011, we applied the
requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. As we
did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities, there was no
disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value,
including our money market funds, foreign currency hedge contracts, and contingent consideration.
ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair value upon
quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable inputs are
not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three
levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical
assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including
quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on
managements best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk. |
Our money market funds carried at fair value are classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair
value in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We determine the fair value of
these instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820 by considering the estimated
amount we would receive or pay to terminate these agreements at the reporting date and by taking
into account current spot rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our
creditworthiness for liabilities. We have classified our foreign currency hedge contracts within
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these observable inputs are available for substantially
the full term of our derivative instruments. The fair value of our foreign currency hedge
contracts is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay upon liquidation of the
contracts, taking into account the change in currency exchange rates.
12
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of
the following as of October 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
143,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,035 |
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of Neoteric contingent consideration
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, we established a liability for payments that we might
make in the future to former shareholders of Neoteric that are tied to the performance of the Blood
Track business for the first three years post acquisition, beginning with fiscal year 2010. We
have reviewed the expected performance versus the necessary thresholds of performance for the
former shareholders to receive additional performance payments and we recorded an adjustment to the
fair value of the contingent consideration as contingent consideration income of $1.6 million in
the accompanying consolidated statements of income, reversing the remaining liability, as the
expected performance thresholds will not be achieved.
In September 2011, we entered into an agreement to release the Company from the contingent
consideration due to the former shareholders of Neoteric. Under the terms of the agreement, the
former shareholders of Neoteric received $0.7 million in exchange for releasing the Company from
any future claims for contingent consideration. The Company paid the $0.7 million settlement
amount during September 2011 and has recorded the associated expense in the selling, general and
administrative line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of our real estate mortgage obligation was $3.7 million and $4.1 million at October
1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, respectively.
9. INCOME TAXES
The Companys reported tax rate was 27.0% and 27.8% for the three and six month periods ended
October 1, 2011, respectively. Our reported tax rate is lower than the federal statutory tax rate
in both periods reported primarily due to lower foreign tax rates, including tax benefits
associated with our Swiss operations.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated federal, consolidated and separate
state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business,
we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions including
the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few exceptions, we are
no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years
before 2007.
13
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although ultimate liability cannot be
determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such
liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of
operations.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we received customer complaints in Europe regarding a
quality issue with our High Separation Core Bowl (HS Core), a plasma disposable product used primarily to
collect plasma for transfusion. Certain of these customers have also made claims regarding
financial losses alleged to have been incurred as a result of this matter. Total aggregate claims
submitted to date by customers relating to this issue are
approximately $8.5 million. We do not expect any additional
material claims from our customers. We are in
the process of evaluating the submitted claims and continue to work with affected customers to minimize
disruption to their operations and ultimately determine the validity and resolution of the
submitted claims. Although this process is not completed, we have determined that it is probable that
we will compensate certain affected customers in order to resolve
their claims. We believe our ultimate liability will be less than
the total claims submitted to date. Our current best estimate of the
liability associated with this matter is $2.4 million, and
accordingly we
have recorded this amount as an expense within selling, general and
administrative expenses as of October 1, 2011. We cannot determine
currently whether a liability greater than $2.4 million will ultimately be incurred. We are also
in the process of determining the extent to which claims may be recoverable under the Companys
insurance policies. We do not currently believe that liabilities related to this matter will
materially affect our consolidated financial position and liquidity.
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment Definition Criteria
We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment: the design, manufacture, and
marketing of blood management solutions. Our chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated
results to make operating and strategic decisions. Manufacturing processes, as well as the
regulatory environment in which we operate, are largely the same for all product lines.
Enterprise Wide Disclosures about Product and Services
We have four global product families: plasma, blood center, hospital, and software solutions.
Our products include equipment devices and the related disposables used with these devices.
Disposables include the plasma, blood center, and hospital product families. Plasma consists of the
disposables used to perform apheresis for the separation of whole blood components and subsequent
collection of plasma to be used as a raw material for biologically derived pharmaceuticals (also
known as source plasma). Blood center consists of disposables which separate whole blood for the
subsequent collection of platelets, plasma, red cells, or a combination of these components for
transfusion to patients. Hospital consists of surgical disposables (principally the Cell Saver® and
Cell Saver Elite ® autologous blood recovery systems targeted to procedures that involve rapid,
high volume blood loss such as cardiovascular surgeries and the cardioPAT® cardiovascular
perioperative autotransfusion system designed to remain with the patient following surgery to
recover blood and the patients red cells to prepare them for reinfusion), the OrthoPAT® orthopedic
perioperative autotransfusion system designed to operate both during and after surgery to recover
and wash the patients red cells to prepare them for reinfusion, and diagnostics products
(principally the TEG® Thrombelastograph® hemostasis analyzer used to help assess a surgical
patients hemostasis (blood clotting ability) during and after surgery).
Disposables (single-use sterile kits used in our devices for collection or salvage of blood
products) are marketed in our plasma, blood center, and hospital product businesses. Plasma
disposables are used with our PCS®2 devices to perform apheresis for the collection of plasma to be
used as a raw material for biologically derived pharmaceuticals (also known as
14
source plasma). Blood center disposables are used with our MCS+ device to collect one or more blood components
(principally platelets but also red cells and plasma) for transfusion to patients. The Hospital
business consists of disposables used with our Cell Saver® and cardioPAT® devices to recover red
cells from blood lost in a surgical procedure so that these may be made available for reinfusion to
the patient (autotransfusion). OrthoPAT® disposables are used for autotransfusion
during and immediately following orthopedic surgeries. Diagnostics products principally reflect
sales of diagnostic reagents and the TEG® Thrombelastograph® hemostasis analyzer which profiles a
patients blood clotting characteristics.
Software solutions include information technology platforms that assist blood centers, plasma
centers, and hospitals to more effectively manage regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
15
Revenues from External Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Disposable revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
64,408 |
|
|
$ |
56,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood center disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
42,195 |
|
|
|
39,746 |
|
Red cell |
|
|
11,645 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,840 |
|
|
|
51,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
16,206 |
|
|
|
16,011 |
|
OrthoPAT |
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
8,281 |
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,160 |
|
|
|
28,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables revenue |
|
|
147,408 |
|
|
|
136,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software solutions |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
16,125 |
|
Equipment & other |
|
|
14,838 |
|
|
|
14,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
179,445 |
|
|
$ |
166,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Disposable revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
127,168 |
|
|
$ |
112,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood center disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
79,504 |
|
|
|
76,063 |
|
Red cell |
|
|
23,514 |
|
|
|
22,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,018 |
|
|
|
98,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
31,948 |
|
|
|
32,362 |
|
OrthoPAT |
|
|
15,049 |
|
|
|
17,238 |
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
9,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,270 |
|
|
|
58,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables revenue |
|
|
288,456 |
|
|
|
270,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software solutions |
|
|
35,359 |
|
|
|
32,585 |
|
Equipment & other |
|
|
26,199 |
|
|
|
27,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
350,014 |
|
|
$ |
329,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
12. REORGANIZATION
During the six months ended October 1, 2011, the Companys restructuring activities primarily
consist of reorganization within our research and development, manufacturing and software
operations. Employee-related costs primarily consist of employee severance and benefits.
Facility-related costs primarily consist of charges associated with closing facilities, related
lease obligations, and other related costs.
For the six months ended October 1, 2011, the Company incurred $3.0 million of restructuring
charges. Restructuring expenses have been primarily included as a component of selling, general
and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of income. We anticipate that the
Company will incur approximately $5 to $6 million in additional restructuring charges related to
these initiatives over the remaining six months of fiscal year 2012.
The following summarizes the restructuring activity for the six months ended October 1, 2011 and
October 2, 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(in thousands) |
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,528 |
|
|
$ |
(2,327 |
) |
|
$ |
2,983 |
|
Facility-related costs |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
$ |
(3,040 |
) |
|
$ |
3,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(in thousands) |
|
April 3, 2010 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
9,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
(5,529 |
) |
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
(5,529 |
) |
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
For costs incurred related to the development of software to be sold, leased, or otherwise
marketed, the Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 985-20, Software, which specifies that
costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be
charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once
technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the
product is available for general release to customers.
The Company capitalized $2.8 million and $3.4 million in software development costs for ongoing
initiatives during the six month periods ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, respectively.
At October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, we have a total of $12.2 million and $13.4 million,
respectively, of costs capitalized related to in process software development initiatives. The
costs capitalized for each project are included in intangible assets in the consolidated financial
statements.
17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
should be read in conjunction with both our interim consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our annual consolidated
financial statements, notes thereto, and the MD&A contained in our fiscal year 2011 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on May 26, 2011. The
following discussion may contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with
the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information beginning on page 28.
Our Business
Haemonetics is a blood management solutions company. Anchored by our medical device systems, we
also provide information technology platforms and value added services to provide customers with
business solutions which support improved clinical outcomes for patients and efficiency in the
blood supply chain.
Our medical device systems automate the collection and processing of donated blood; assess
likelihood for blood loss; salvage and process blood from surgery patients; and dispense and track
blood inventory in the hospital. These systems include devices and single-use, proprietary
disposable sets (disposables) that operate only with our specialized devices. Specifically, our
plasma and blood center systems allow users to collect and process only the blood component(s) they
target plasma, platelets, or red blood cells increasing donor and patient safety as well as
collection efficiencies. Our blood diagnostics system assesses hemostasis (a patients clotting
ability) to aid clinicians in assessing the cause of bleeding resulting in overall reductions in
blood product usage. Our surgical blood salvage systems allow surgeons to collect the blood lost
by a patient in surgery, cleanse the blood, and make it available for transfusion back to the
patient. Our blood tracking systems automate the distribution of blood products in the hospital.
Our business services products include blood management, Six Sigma, and LEAN manufacturing
consulting, which support our customers needs for regulatory compliance and operational efficiency
in the blood supply chain.
We either sell our devices to customers (resulting in equipment revenue) or place our devices with
customers subject to certain conditions. When the device remains our property, the customer has the
right to use it for a period of time as long as the customer meets certain conditions we have
established, which, among other things, generally include one or more of the following:
|
|
|
Purchase and consumption of a minimum level of disposables products; |
|
|
|
|
Payment of monthly rental fees; and |
|
|
|
|
An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of
procedures per month per device. |
Our disposables revenue stream, which includes the sales of disposables and fees for the use of our
equipment, accounted for approximately 82.4% and 81.9% of our total revenues for the first six
months of fiscal year 2012 and 2011, respectively.
18
Financial Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands,
except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
179,445 |
|
|
$ |
166,833 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
350,014 |
|
|
$ |
329,872 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
89,949 |
|
|
$ |
87,755 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
178,698 |
|
|
$ |
174,217 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
71,383 |
|
|
$ |
58,850 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
$ |
136,223 |
|
|
$ |
121,125 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
18,566 |
|
|
$ |
28,905 |
|
|
|
(35.8 |
%) |
|
$ |
42,475 |
|
|
$ |
53,092 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
%) |
% of net revenues |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
% |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
(48.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
19,011 |
|
|
$ |
29,159 |
|
|
|
(34.8 |
%) |
|
$ |
42,705 |
|
|
$ |
53,534 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax |
|
$ |
5,131 |
|
|
$ |
7,821 |
|
|
|
(34.4 |
%) |
|
$ |
11,877 |
|
|
$ |
14,277 |
|
|
|
(16.8 |
%) |
% of pre-tax income |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
|
(35.0 |
%) |
|
$ |
30,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,257 |
|
|
|
(21.5 |
%) |
% of net revenues |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
(36.5 |
%) |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
|
(23.4 |
%) |
Net revenues increased 7.6% and 6.1% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Without the
effects of foreign exchange which accounted for an increase of 2.3% and 2.5% for the second quarter
and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012, net revenues increased 5.3% and 3.6% for
the quarter and six months ended October 1, 2011. This increase reflects strong year over year
revenue growth from our plasma, TEG and software businesses, offset by declines in our hospital
businesses primarily due to a recall of certain of our OrthoPAT devices.
Gross profit increased 2.5% and 2.6% as compared to the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2011. Without the effects of foreign exchange, which increased gross
profit by 2.2% and 2.6% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year
2012, gross profit increased 0.3% and was flat for the quarter and six months, respectively, ended
October 1, 2011. Our gross profit margin decreased by 170 basis points for the first six months of
fiscal year 2012. The decrease was primarily due to increased product quality costs and product
mix associated with lower sales of hospital products and higher plasma disposable sales.
Operating expenses increased 21.3% and 12.5% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange accounted for an increase in operating expenses of 5.5% and 4.6% for the quarter and six
months, respectively. Without the effects of foreign exchange, operating expenses increased 15.8%
and 7.9% in the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012. Higher
operating expenses are attributable to increased restructuring costs, $2.4 million of expenses
associated with customer claims arising from a quality matter with a plasma disposable product, and
increased investment in research and development and sales and marketing. These increases were
partially offset by lower expense associated with cash bonus compensation for this fiscal year.
Operating income decreased 35.8% and 20.0% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Foreign exchange accounted for a
decrease of 4.6% and 1.9% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year
2012. Without the effects of foreign exchange, operating income decreased 31.2% and 18.1% for the
quarter and six months, respectively, as increases in operating expenses more than offset gross
profit associated with revenue growth due to product mix and higher costs of quality.
Net income decreased 35.0% and 21.5% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of
fiscal year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Without the effects of foreign
exchange which accounted for a decrease in net income of 3.3% and 1.8% for the quarter and six
months, respectively, net income decreased 31.7% and 19.7% for the
19
quarter and six months ended
October 1, 2011. The decrease in net income was attributable to the decline in operating income
described above.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues by Geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
78,740 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
$ |
172,734 |
|
|
$ |
158,049 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
International |
|
|
93,106 |
|
|
|
88,093 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
177,280 |
|
|
|
171,823 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
179,445 |
|
|
$ |
166,833 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
350,014 |
|
|
$ |
329,872 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Operations and the Impact of Foreign Exchange
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are
marketed in more than 80 countries around the world through a combination of our direct sales force
and independent distributors and agents.
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. approximated 51% of net revenues for the first six months
of fiscal year 2012 and 2011. Revenues in Japan accounted for approximately 16.9% and 16.5% of
total revenues for the first six months of fiscal year 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues in
Europe accounted for approximately 26.0% and 26.8% of net revenues for the first six months of
fiscal year 2012 and 2011, respectively. International sales are generally conducted in local
currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro. As discussed above, our results of operations
are impacted by changes in the value of the Yen and the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar.
Please see section entitled Foreign Exchange in this discussion for a more complete explanation
of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
Net Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Disposables |
|
$ |
147,408 |
|
|
$ |
136,493 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
288,456 |
|
|
$ |
270,057 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Software solutions |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
16,125 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
35,359 |
|
|
|
32,585 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Equipment & other |
|
|
14,838 |
|
|
|
14,215 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
26,199 |
|
|
|
27,230 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
179,445 |
|
|
$ |
166,833 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
350,014 |
|
|
$ |
329,872 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Disposable Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
64,408 |
|
|
$ |
56,514 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
$ |
127,168 |
|
|
$ |
112,431 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood center disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
42,195 |
|
|
|
39,746 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
79,504 |
|
|
|
76,063 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Red cell |
|
|
11,645 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
23,514 |
|
|
|
22,608 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,840 |
|
|
$ |
51,040 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
103,018 |
|
|
$ |
98,671 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
16,206 |
|
|
|
16,011 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
31,948 |
|
|
|
32,362 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
OrthoPAT |
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
8,281 |
|
|
|
(11.9 |
%) |
|
|
15,049 |
|
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
%) |
Diagnostics |
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
9,355 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,160 |
|
|
$ |
28,939 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
58,270 |
|
|
$ |
58,955 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total disposables revenue |
|
$ |
147,408 |
|
|
$ |
136,493 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
288,456 |
|
|
$ |
270,057 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables
Disposables revenue increased 8.0% and 6.8% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange resulted in an increase of 2.6% for the quarter and six months ended October 1, 2011.
Without the effect of foreign exchange, disposables revenue increased 5.4% and 4.2% for the second
quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012, driven primarily by increases in
our plasma business as discussed below.
Plasma
Plasma disposables revenue increased 14.0% and 13.1% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange accounted for an increase of 1.2% and 1.3% for the quarter and six months, respectively,
ended October 1, 2011. The remaining increase in plasma disposables revenue of 12.8% and 11.8% for
the quarter and six months, respectively, is primarily attributable to increased plasma collections
by our commercial fractionation customers in North America. We expect the strong growth in
commercial collections to moderate over the balance of fiscal year 2012.
Blood Center
Blood center consists of disposables used to collect platelets and red cells. Platelet disposables
revenue increased 6.2% and 4.5% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of
fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011. Foreign exchange accounted for
a revenue increase of 5.7% and 5.4%, from the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of
fiscal year 2011 to the same periods of fiscal year 2012. Without the effect of foreign exchange,
platelet disposable revenue increased 0.5% and decreased 0.9% for the quarter and six months,
respectively, ended October 1, 2012. Sales growth in the second quarter included the benefit of
quality issues experienced with a competitors device in Japan. We expect platelet disposable
sales to remain relatively flat over the balance of fiscal year 2012 as emerging market growth is
expected to be offset by competitive factors negatively impacting sales in mature international
markets.
Red cell disposables revenue increased 3.1% and 4.0% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange accounted for a revenue increase of 0.3% and 0.4% from the second quarter and first six
months, respectively, of fiscal year 2011 to the same periods of fiscal year 2012. The remaining
increase of 2.8% and 3.6% for the quarter and six months, respectively, was driven by increased
demand for red cells in North America.
21
Hospital
Hospital consists of Surgical, OrthoPAT, and Diagnostics products. Surgical disposables revenue
consists principally of the Cell Saver and cardioPAT products. Revenues from our surgical
disposables increased 1.2% and decreased 1.3% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange resulted in an increase in surgical disposables revenue of 2.7% and 3.1% for the quarter
and six months, respectively, ended October 1, 2011. The decrease of 1.5% and 4.4% excluding the
effect of foreign exchange for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2012,
respectively, was the result of a decrease in demand across our European and North American
markets, driven primarily by competitive pressures, and market conditions resulting in fewer
elective surgeries.
Revenues from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 11.9% and 12.7% for the second quarter and first
six months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011.
Foreign exchange resulted in an increase in OrthoPAT disposables revenue of 1.7% and 1.8% for the
quarter and six months, respectively. Without the effect of foreign currency, OrthoPAT disposables
revenue decreased by 13.6% and 14.5% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of
fiscal year 2012. Our voluntary recall of our OrthoPAT devices manufactured prior to 2002 initiated during the first quarter adversely impacted our business. We expect to complete the build of replacement
devices in our fourth quarter. Accordingly, we expect this trend to continue but moderate in
future periods.
Diagnostics product revenue consists principally of the TEG products. Revenues from our
diagnostics products increased 21.8% and 20.5% for the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2012 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2011. Currency
exchange accounted for a decrease of 0.6% and 0.5% for the quarter and six months, respectively.
Without the effect of currency, diagnostics product revenues increased by 22.4% and 21.0% for the
quarter and six months, respectively. The revenue increase is due to continued adoption of our
TEG equipment, including significant new business in emerging markets.
Software Solutions
Our software solutions revenues include sales of our information technology software platforms and
consulting services. Software revenues increased 6.7% and 8.5% for the second quarter and first six
months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Foreign
exchange resulted in a 0.2% and 1.6% increase for the quarter and six months, respectively, ended
October 1, 2011. The remaining increase of 6.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was driven
primarily by installed base growth in our SafeTraceTX and BloodTrack products. The increase for
the six months ended October 1, 2011 also included the benefit of strong plasma-related sales
growth in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
Equipment & Other
Our equipment and other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under
preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service
and training programs. These revenues are primarily composed of equipment sales, which tend to
vary from period-to-period more than our disposable business due to the timing of order patterns,
particularly in our distribution markets. Equipment and other revenues increased 4.4% and
decreased 3.8% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively of fiscal year 2012 over
the comparable periods of fiscal year 2011. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.7% and 2.8% increase
for the quarter and six months ended October 1, 2011. Without the effect of currency exchange, the
increase of 2.7% for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by the positive impact
of the timing of a key customer award in our distribution markets, offset by lower equipment sales
to the military in North America. The decrease of 6.6% for the first six months of fiscal year
2012 was primarily driven by the decline in military orders noted as well as lower equipment sales
in our distribution business.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
89,949 |
|
|
$ |
87,755 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
178,698 |
|
|
$ |
174,217 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
22
Gross profit increased 2.5% and 2.6% as compared to the second quarter and first six months,
respectively, of fiscal year 2011. Without the effects of foreign exchange, which increased gross
profit by 2.2% and 2.6% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year
2012, gross profit increased 0.3% and was flat for the quarter and six months, respectively, ended
October 1, 2011. Our gross profit margin decreased by 250 and 170 basis points for the three and six month periods ending October 1, 2011, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to
increased product quality costs and product mix associated with lower sales of hospital products
and higher plasma disposable sales. The increased product quality costs included the shipment of a
higher cost substitute product for certain plasma disposable sales in Europe in response to
customer complaints that we are currently addressing. For further discussion related to this
matter, refer to the discussion under selling, general and administrative expense below. We expect
the product quality and mix trends noted to continue to impact gross profit over the balance of
fiscal year 2012.
In October 2011, a facility of one of our contract manufacturers was damaged by the recent floods
in Thailand. We have worked with the contract manufacturer to transition the manufacturing of the
products that were made in this facility to the contract manufacturers facility in Japan and our own
manufacturing locations. We expect some higher costs associated with the transition. We currently do not
expect material supply disruption to our customers. We are actively communicating with our customers
about our continuity plans. However, customers may choose to mitigate their risk by leveraging
alternate suppliers, which may negatively impact future sales and gross margins.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
10,350 |
|
|
$ |
7,954 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
$ |
18,959 |
|
|
$ |
15,875 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
62,613 |
|
|
$ |
52,790 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
$ |
118,844 |
|
|
$ |
107,144 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
(1,580 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
%) |
|
$ |
(1,580 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
%) |
% of net revenues |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
71,383 |
|
|
$ |
58,850 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
$ |
136,223 |
|
|
$ |
121,125 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.9 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased 30.1% and 19.4% for the second quarter and first six
months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2011.
Foreign exchange resulted in an increase in research and development expense of 2.1% and 2.9%
during the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal year 2012. Excluding the
impact of foreign exchange, research and development expense increased 28.0% and 16.5% for the
second quarter and six months, respectively, ended October 1, 2011. These increases were primarily
related to the general increase in development programs in support of long-term product plans and
near term quality improvements.
Selling, General and Administrative
During the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2012, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 18.6% and 10.9%, respectively, compared to the same periods of
fiscal year 2011. Foreign exchange resulted in an increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses of 5.8% and 4.7% during the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal
year 2012. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative expense
increased 12.8% and 6.2% for the second quarter and six months, respectively, ended October 1,
2011. These increases were attributable to $2.4 million of expenses associated with customer
claims arising from a quality issue with a plasma disposable product, and increased investment in
our worldwide sales and marketing organizations. These increases were partially offset by lower
expense associated with cash bonus compensation for this fiscal year.
23
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we received customer complaints in Europe regarding a
quality issue with our High Separation Core Bowl (HS Core), a plasma disposable product used primarily to
collect plasma for transfusion. Certain of these customers have also made claims regarding
financial losses alleged to have been incurred as a result of this matter. Total aggregate claims
submitted to date by customers relating to this issue are
approximately $8.5 million. We do not expect any additional
material claims from our customers. We are in
the process of evaluating the submitted claims and continue to work with affected customers to minimize
disruption to their operations and ultimately determine the validity and resolution of the
submitted claims. Although this process is not completed, we have determined that it is probable that
we will compensate certain affected customers in order to resolve
their claims. We believe our ultimate liability will be less than
the total claims submitted to date. Our current best estimate of the
liability associated with this matter is $2.4 million, and
accordingly we
have recorded this amount as an expense within selling, general and
administrative expenses as of October 1, 2011. We cannot determine
currently whether a liability greater than $2.4 million will ultimately be incurred. We are also
in the process of determining the extent to which claims may be recoverable under the Companys
insurance policies. We do not currently believe that liabilities related to this matter will
materially affect our consolidated financial position and liquidity.
Contingent Consideration Income
Under the accounting rules for business combinations (specifically, ASC Topic 805, Business
Combinations), we established a liability for payments that we might make in the future to former
shareholders of Neoteric that are tied to the performance of the Blood Track business for the first
three years post acquisition, beginning with fiscal year 2010. We have reviewed the expected
performance versus the necessary thresholds of performance for the former shareholders to receive
additional performance payments and we recorded an adjustment to the fair value of the contingent
consideration as contingent consideration income of $1.6 million and $1.9 million for the six
months ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, respectively.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net, increased during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the same
period of fiscal year 2011, primarily due to the reversal of $0.6 million of interest expense on
contingent consideration related to the Neoteric acquisition. Other income, net decreased for the
first six months of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the same period of fiscal year 2011, primarily
due to an increase in foreign exchange transaction losses of foreign currency denominated assets
offset by the reversal of net interest expense of $0.6 million on contingent consideration related
to the Neoteric acquisition.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
Reported income tax rate |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
The Companys reported tax rate was 27.0% and 27.8% for the three and six month periods ended
October 1, 2011, respectively. Our reported tax rate is lower than the federal statutory tax rate
in both periods reported primarily due to lower foreign tax rates, including tax benefits
associated with our Swiss operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and
cash flow position:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
Cash & cash equivalents |
|
$ |
183,421 |
|
|
$ |
196,707 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
330,294 |
|
|
$ |
340,160 |
|
Current ratio |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Net cash position (1) |
|
$ |
177,009 |
|
|
$ |
191,828 |
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Disposable finished goods inventory turnover |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net cash position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt. |
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flow
from operations, and option exercises. We believe these sources are sufficient to fund our cash
requirements over the next twelve months, which are primarily capital expenditures and may include
share repurchases under-future programs authorized by the Board of Directors at its
discretion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
52,539 |
|
|
$ |
44,286 |
|
|
$ |
8,253 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(23,713 |
) |
|
|
(23,826 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(41,753 |
) |
|
|
(47,301 |
) |
|
|
5,548 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents (1) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(13,286 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,513 |
) |
|
$ |
13,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency
amounts into U.S. dollars. In accordance with GAAP, we have removed the effect of foreign currency
throughout our cash flow statement, except for its effect on our cash and cash equivalents. |
Cash Flow Overview:
Six Month Comparison
Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $8.3 million in the first six months of
fiscal year 2012 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2011, primarily due to lower
payments for annual bonuses and restructuring and transformation costs. Payments related to
transformation activities were higher in the prior year due to the timing of our Global Med
acquisition, which closed at the end of fiscal year 2010. Cash provided by operations was
negatively impacted in the first six months of fiscal 2012 by higher inventory levels to support
plasma growth, launch of our next generation surgical device and the replacement of recalled
OrthoPAT devices.
Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $0.1 million during the first six months of
fiscal year 2012 as compared to the first six months of 2011 due to a $0.2 million decrease in
capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment, which was partially offset by $0.1 million
decrease in proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used to fund share repurchases under common stock repurchase programs was $50.0 million
during the first six months of both fiscal 2011 and 2012. Net cash used in financing activities
decreased by $5.5 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2012, as compared to the first
six months of 2011 due primarily to a $7.2 million increase in net borrowings under short-term
credit arrangements.
25
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the
periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation
by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity,
and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures
generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs. Increases
in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to
procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
During the first six months of fiscal year 2012, approximately 51% of our sales were generated
outside the U.S., generally in foreign currencies, yet our reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar.
Our primary foreign currency exposures relate to sales denominated in the Euro and the Japanese
Yen. We also have foreign currency exposure related to manufacturing and other operational costs
denominated in the Swiss Franc, the British Pound, and the Canadian Dollar. The Yen and Euro sales
exposure is partially mitigated by costs and expenses for foreign operations and sourcing products
denominated in foreign currencies. Since our foreign currency denominated Yen and Euro sales exceed
the foreign currency denominated costs, whenever the U.S. Dollar strengthens relative to the Yen or
Euro, there is an adverse affect on our results of operations and, conversely, whenever the U.S.
dollar weakens relative to the Yen or Euro, there is a positive effect on our results of
operations. For the Swiss Franc, the British Pound, and the Canadian Dollar, our primary cash
flows relate to product costs or costs and expenses of local operations. Whenever the U.S. Dollar
strengthens relative to these foreign currencies, there is a positive effect on our results of
operations. Conversely, whenever the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to these currencies, there is an
adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to
minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in
foreign exchange rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated
cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the
Euro, and to a lesser extent the Swiss Franc, British Pound, and the Canadian Dollar. This does
not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward
contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial
planning and resource allocation.
These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are intended to lock in the expected cash
flows of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and costs at the available spot rate.
Actual spot rate gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in sales and costs, at the same
time the underlying transactions being hedged are recorded. The final impact of currency
fluctuations on the results of operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the
actual local currency results.
Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, British Pound, and
Swiss Franc cash flow hedges that settled during fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012 or are presently
outstanding. These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales
designated in Euros and the Japanese Yen. These hedges also include our short positions associated
with costs incurred in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, and Swiss Francs. The table also shows
how the strengthening or weakening of the spot rates associated with those hedge contracts versus
the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the prior comparable period affects our results
favorably or unfavorably. The table assumes a consistent notional amount for hedge contracts in
each period presented.
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Favorable / |
|
Second |
|
Favorable / |
|
Third |
|
Favorable / |
|
Fourth |
|
Favorable / |
|
|
Quarter |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Unfavorable) |
Euro -
Hedge Spot
Rate (US$
per Euro) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
FY12
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
%) |
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
%) |
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
%) |
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
FY13
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese
Yen -
Hedge Spot
Rate (JPY
per US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
105.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
98.17 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
94.91 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
89.13 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
89.78 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
FY12
|
|
|
88.99 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
85.65 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
81.73 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
82.45 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
FY13
|
|
|
79.40 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
76.65 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
Dollar -
Hedge Spot
Rate (CAD
per US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
%) |
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
%) |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
%) |
FY12
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
%) |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
%) |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
%) |
FY13
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
%) |
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British
Pound -
Hedge
Spot Rate
(US$ per
GBP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
%) |
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
(14.8 |
%) |
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
%) |
FY12
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
FY13
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
%) |
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swiss
Franc -
Hedge
Spot Rate
(CHF per
US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY12
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
%) |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
%) |
FY13
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
(21.9 |
%) |
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
(20.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP
and IFRSs. Update No. 2011-04 updates the accounting guidance related to fair value measurements that results
in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure
about fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The
updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
Early application is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of Update No.
2011-04 on our consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective for our fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2012.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Update No. 2011-05 updates the disclosure requirements
for comprehensive income to include total of comprehensive income, the components of net income,
and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not
affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The updated guidance is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should
be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted and amendments do not require any
transition disclosures. This statement is effective in our first quarter of fiscal year 2013.
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350). ASU 2011-08 allows entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is
necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes, as a result of
its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative two-step
goodwill impairment test is required.
An entity has the unconditional option to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to
performing the first step of the
27
goodwill impairment test. The Company anticipates that the
adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
and footnote disclosures.
Standards Implemented
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, and Accounting Standards Update No.
2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software (the Updates).
The Updates provide guidance on arrangements that include software elements, including tangible
products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible
product and will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and
software-enabled products that will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance.
The Updates also provide authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables
that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance,
when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence of fair value for deliverables in
an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to allocate
arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The Updates also include new
disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the
timing and amount of revenue recognition. On April 3, 2011, the Company adopted this guidance,
which did not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-29, Business Combinations
(Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. Update
No. 2010-29 clarifies paragraph 805-10-50-2(h) to require public entities that enter into business
combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis to disclose pro forma
information for such business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period, including
pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the acquisition date had been as of
the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. We did not complete any
material business acquisitions during the six months ended October 1, 2011 thus the disclosure
requirements were not applicable for the period.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the
words may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project, intend,
designed, and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding
events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business
strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current
expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no
firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not
possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be
relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These
forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such
risks and uncertainties include technological advances in the medical field and our standards for
transfusion medicine and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such
advances and standards, product demand and market acceptance of our products, regulatory
uncertainties, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products
and pricing, the impact of industry consolidation, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in
customers ordering patterns, the effect of industry consolidation as seen in the plasma market,
the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of uncertainties in markets outside the U.S.
(including Europe and Asia) in which we operate. The foregoing list should not be construed as
exhaustive. See the Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations sections contained elsewhere in this report, as well as our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011.
28
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Companys exposures relative to market risk are due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate
risk.
Foreign exchange risk
See the section entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our
business. It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our
financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial
instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign
currency denominated sales. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative or trading
activities.
We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10% strengthening
and weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the event of a 10%
strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts would result in
a $10.2 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10% weakening of the
US dollar would result in a $11.9 million decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
All of our long-term debt is at fixed rates. Accordingly, we do not have any material exposure to
interest rates.
29
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We conducted an evaluation, as of October 1, 2011, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Companys
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in
Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective as of October 1, 2011.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting which occurred
during the six months ended October 1, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Fenwal Patent Litigation
For the past five years, we have pursued a patent infringement lawsuit against Fenwal, the details of which are summarized in
our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011. In January 2010, we were awarded damages and an injunction against
Fenwal in connection with this lawsuit.
On June 2, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts claim construction
and, accordingly, vacated the injunction and damages previously awarded to Haemonetics, and
remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. On September 15, 2011, the trial
court granted a summary judgment motion which essentially ended the U.S. case in Fenwals favor.
We continue to pursue a patent infringement action in Germany against Fenwal, and its European and
German subsidiary, for Fenwals infringement of Haemonetics corresponding European patent to the
Haemonetics patent at issue in the United States litigation. Further details related to these proceedings have been disclosed in our Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011. There has been no material developments related to these proceedings during the current fiscal year.
Haemonetics Italia Matter
In April 2008, our subsidiary Haemonetics Italia, Srl. and two of its employees were found guilty
by a court in Milan, Italy of charges arising from allegedly improper payments made under a
consulting contract with a local physician and in pricing products under a tender from a public
hospital. The two employees found guilty in this matter are no longer employed by the Company.
This matter dates to 2004 and involved other unrelated companies and individuals. On June 14,
2011, the final level appeals court affirmed these verdicts. There are no further appeals
available and the convictions are now final. When the matters first arose, our Board of Directors
commissioned independent legal counsel to conduct investigations on its behalf. Based upon its
evaluation of counsels report, the Board concluded that no disciplinary action was warranted in
either case. Neither the original ruling nor its final affirmation has impacted the Companys
business in Italy to date.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be
given to the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended April 2, 2011, which could materially affect the Companys business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect its business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In a May 2, 2011 press release, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the
repurchase of up to $50.0 million worth of Company shares during fiscal year 2012. Through October
1, 2011, the Company repurchased 852,410 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price
of $50.0 million. We reflect stock repurchases in our financial statements on a trade date basis
and as Authorized Unissued (Haemonetics is a Massachusetts company and under Massachusetts law
repurchased shares are treated as authorized but unissued).
All of the purchases during the quarter were made under the publicly announced program. All
purchases were made in the open market.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dollar Value |
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
of Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
including |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Repurchased |
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
August 1, 2011 to August 25, 2011 |
|
|
852,410 |
|
|
$ |
58.65 |
|
|
$ |
49,997,524 |
|
|
$ |
2,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
852,410 |
|
|
$ |
58.65 |
|
|
$ |
49,997,524 |
|
|
$ |
2,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
Item 5. Other Information
On October 27, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a form of an indemnification agreement that it anticipates entering
into with each current director as well as future directors. A copy of the agreement is filed with this report as Exhibit 10.1
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of director indemnification agreement
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President Business Development of the Company |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President Business Development of the Company |
|
|
|
101*
|
|
The following materials from Haemonetics Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 1, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated
Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to
this Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes
of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for the purposes of section 18 of
the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 3, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial
Officer and Vice
President Business Development
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
33