sv4za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 27, 2006
Registration
No. 333-131615
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
5051 |
|
95-1142616 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
David H. Hannah
Chief Executive Officer
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Decker, Esq. |
|
William S. Johnson |
|
Mark A. Conley, Esq. |
J. Brett Pritchard, Esq. |
|
Vice President, Chief Financial |
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP |
|
Officer and Secretary |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 800 |
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
10650 Alameda Street |
|
(310) 788-4400 |
(213) 485-1500 |
|
Lynwood, California 90262
(323) 567-1122 |
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective and upon completion of the merger
described in the enclosed proxy statement/ prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Merger Proposal
Proxy Statement/ Prospectus
March 1, 2006
Dear Stockholder:
We are pleased to invite you to a special meeting of
stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, to be held
on March 31, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the
headquarters of EMJ located at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood,
California. At the special meeting, our stockholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger agreement, dated as
of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, RSAC Acquisition
Corp., or RSAC, and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or
Reliance.
Reliance and EMJ have agreed on a merger transaction pursuant to
which Reliance will acquire EMJ. If we complete the merger, EMJ
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance and EMJ common
stock will no longer be publicly traded. Reliance has offered
total consideration for each share of EMJ common stock of
approximately $13.00. In particular, upon completion of the
merger, you will be entitled to receive for each share of EMJ
common stock you own $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892 and 0.1207
of a share of Reliance common stock, depending on the average
trading price per share of Reliance common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange during a 20 trading day period ending with and
including the second trading day prior to completion of the
merger. The formula for determining the appropriate fraction of
a share of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for
each share of EMJ common stock is set forth in detail in the
accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus.
Depending on the exchange ratio and the number of shares of EMJ
common stock outstanding, Reliance will issue a minimum of
approximately 4.5 million and a maximum of approximately
6.1 million shares of common stock. Therefore, immediately
after completion of the merger, EMJ stockholders will hold a
minimum of approximately 11.9% and a maximum of approximately
15.5% of Reliances then outstanding common stock.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, when you are asked to vote on
the merger at the time of the special meeting, you will not know
the precise value of the merger consideration that you will
receive on the date the merger is completed. Reliance common
stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
RS. On February 24, 2006, the closing sales
price of a share of Reliance common stock was $87.60. EMJ common
stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
JOR. On February 24, 2006, the closing sales
price of a share of EMJ common stock was $14.50.
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement is advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its
stockholders. Accordingly, EMJs board of directors
unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and
unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the
adoption and the approval of the merger agreement at the special
meeting.
We encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement/
prospectus carefully because it explains the proposed merger,
the documents related to the merger, the special meeting and
other related matters. In particular, please see the section
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 30 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus. You can also obtain other
information about EMJ and Reliance from documents each party has
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
David M. Roderick
Chairman of the Board
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities
to be issued pursuant to this proxy statement/ prospectus or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this proxy statement/
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this proxy statement/ prospectus is March 1,
2006,
and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to EMJ
stockholders on or about March 3, 2006.
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On March 31, 2006
We will hold a special meeting of stockholders of Earle M.
Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, on March 31, 2006, at
9:00 a.m., local time, at EMJs headquarters located
at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California. The purpose
of the special meeting is to:
|
|
|
(1) allow you to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt
and approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger
agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ,
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, and RSAC
Acquisition Corp., a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of
Reliance, or RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and
into RSAC, with RSAC as the surviving corporation; and |
|
|
(2) transact any other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting. |
The accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus describes the
proposed merger, the merger agreement and related matters in
more detail. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this
proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex A. We encourage you to
read the entire proxy statement/ prospectus carefully. In
particular, you should carefully consider the discussion
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 30. The
proxy statement/ prospectus sets forth certain appraisal rights
that may exist in the event the proposed merger agreement is
approved and you dissent to the merger in a timely manner and in
accordance with Delaware law.
EMJs board of directors set March 2, 2006, as the
record date for the special meeting. As a result, holders of
record of EMJ common stock at the close of business on
March 2, 2006 are entitled to notice of, and to vote with
respect to, all matters to be acted upon at the special meeting
or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
EMJs board of directors unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that
EMJ stockholders vote FOR the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the special
meeting in person. However, whether or not you plan to attend
the special meeting in person, you are urged to promptly submit
your proxy:
|
|
|
|
|
by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy
card(s) in the envelope provided, |
|
|
|
by telephone, or |
|
|
|
over the Internet. |
The proxy card(s) requires no postage if mailed in the United
States in the enclosed, self-addressed return envelope. You may
revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying
proxy statement/ prospectus at any time before your shares have
been voted at the special meeting, including by attending the
meeting and voting your shares in person.
Your vote is important. If you own shares directly, your
failure to vote those shares or an abstention from voting will
have the same effect as a vote against the merger. If you hold
your shares through a broker and fail to direct your broker as
to how those shares are to be voted, the broker will not vote
those shares. This will also have the same effect as a vote
against the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. If
you are a participant in the EMJ retirement savings plan and you
fail to direct the plans trustee as to how those shares
are to be voted, the trustee will vote those shares in the same
proportion as the votes of shares for which the trustee has
received directions from other participants in the retirement
savings plan.
You should not send EMJ stock certificates with your proxy
card(s). After completion of the merger, the exchange/paying
agent will send you written instructions for exchanging EMJ
stock certificates for cash and Reliance stock certificates.
If you have any questions, or need assistance in voting your
proxy, you may call William S. Johnson, EMJs secretary, at
(323) 567-1122.
|
|
|
By order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
William S. Johnson |
|
VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
AND SECRETARY |
Lynwood, California
March 1, 2006
REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Reliance and EMJ that is not
included in, or delivered with, this proxy statement/
prospectus. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement/ prospectus, other than certain exhibits
to incorporated information, by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company at the following
addresses and telephone numbers, or by visiting the following
Websites:
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
|
|
10650 Alameda Street |
Los Angeles, California 90071
|
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Attention: Investor Relations |
Telephone: (213) 687-7700
|
|
Telephone: (323) 567-1122 |
Website: www.rsac.com
|
|
Website: www.emjmetals.com |
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request. EMJ stockholders requesting documents should do so by
March 24, 2006, in order to receive them before the special
meeting.
For a more detailed description about the information
incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus, see
Where You Can Find More Information on
page 116. Note that among the documents incorporated by
reference will be Reliances Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which is expected to be
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions
and Reliances Websites on March 15, 2006.
EMJ has supplied all information contained or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus relating to EMJ,
and Reliance has supplied all information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus
relating to Reliance.
Information contained on Reliances and EMJs Websites
is not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that
is different. This proxy statement/ prospectus may only be used
where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in
this proxy statement/ prospectus may only be accurate on the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Number of Directors
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Classification of Board of Directors
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Cumulative Voting
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Filing of Vacancies on the Board of Directors
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Special Meetings of the Board
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Special Meetings of the Shareholders
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
Advance Notice Provisions for Meetings of Shareholders
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Action by Written Consent of the Shareholders
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Proxies
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Charter Amendment
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Amendment of Bylaws
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
Dividends and Repurchases of Shares
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
Appraisal and Dissenters Rights
|
|
|
107 |
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
Liability and Indemnity
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
Indemnity Insurance
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
Preemptive Rights
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
Certain Business Combination Restrictions
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
Vote on Extraordinary Corporate Transactions
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Fiduciary Duties of Directors
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Interested Party Transactions
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Shareholder Suits
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
Inspection of Books and Records
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
Stockholder Rights Plan
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
LIST OF ANNEXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
|
C-1 |
|
|
|
|
D-1 |
|
|
|
|
E-1 |
|
Exhibit 2.2 |
Exhibit 8.1 |
Exhibit 8.2 |
Exhibit 23.1 |
Exhibit 23.2 |
Exhibit 99.3 |
iv
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT
THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder
of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, may have regarding the
merger and the special meeting of EMJ stockholders and brief
answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully this
proxy statement/ prospectus, including the documents included as
annexes, because the information in this section does not
provide all the information that might be important to you with
respect to the matters being considered at the special meeting.
Additional important information is also contained in the
documents that are incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
About the Merger
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the purpose of the special meeting? |
|
|
A: |
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, is
proposing to acquire EMJ. You are being asked to vote to adopt
and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the merger
agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ,
Reliance and RSAC Acquisition Corp, or RSAC, through which EMJ
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon
completion of the merger, EMJ common stock will no longer be
publicly traded, and you will receive consideration, consisting
of cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock, for
each share of EMJ common stock you hold. As part of the merger,
RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company. For
more information concerning the merger consideration, please see
the section entitled Summary of the Proxy Statement/
Prospectus What You Will Receive beginning on
page 6 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What is this document? |
|
A: |
|
EMJs board of directors is using this document as a proxy
statement to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common
stock for use at the special meeting. In addition, Reliance is
sending this document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in
connection with the issuance of registered shares of Reliance
common stock in exchange for shares of EMJ common stock in the
merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Does EMJs board of directors recommend that EMJ
stockholders vote FOR the merger agreement? |
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. EMJs board of directors unanimously recommends that
EMJ stockholders vote FOR the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement. To review the boards reasons for
recommending the merger agreement, please see the section
entitled The Merger EMJs Reasons for the
Merger and The Merger Recommendation of
EMJs Board of Directors beginning on page 52 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
|
A: |
|
We expect to complete the merger as soon as possible after EMJ
stockholders adopt and approve the merger agreement at the
special meeting and after the satisfaction or waiver of all
other conditions to the merger, which are described in this
proxy statement/prospectus. We expect the merger to be completed
in early April 2006. |
|
About the Special Meeting
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the EMJ special meeting? |
|
|
A: |
|
The EMJ special meeting will take place on March 31, 2006,
at 9:00 a.m., local time, and will be held at EMJs
headquarters located at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood,
California. |
|
1
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting? |
|
|
A: |
|
Holders of record of EMJ common stock at the close of business
on March 2, 2006, which is the date EMJs board of
directors has fixed as the record date for the special meeting,
are entitled to vote at the special meeting. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the required vote to adopt and approve the merger
agreement? |
|
|
A: |
|
For the merger to occur, the merger agreement must be adopted
and approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock. As a condition to the signing of the
merger agreement, Reliance required certain EMJ stockholders
that hold approximately 50.1% of the outstanding EMJ common
stock to enter into a voting agreement to vote all of their
shares in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated
prior to the special meeting in accordance with its terms, you
should expect that the merger agreement will be approved at the
special meeting regardless of the votes of any other EMJ
stockholders. For additional information regarding the voting
agreement, including the termination provisions, please see the
summary of the voting agreement under The Voting
Agreement beginning on page 90. |
|
The stockholders of Reliance are not required to approve the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I own directly? |
|
|
A: |
|
You can vote in person at the special meeting or you can vote by
telephone, on the Internet or by mail as described below. Votes
by telephone or the Internet must be received by
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, March 30, 2006. We recommend
that you vote by proxy, even if you plan to attend the special
meeting. If you abstain from voting or do not vote your shares,
it will have the same effect as voting against the adoption and
approval of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
|
If your shares are held in your name, you can vote by proxy as
follows: |
|
|
|
By telephone: Use the
toll-free number listed on the proxy card.
Easy-to-follow voice
prompts allow you to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
By Internet: The
Website for Internet voting is listed on the proxy card. |
|
|
|
By mail: Complete,
sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed
pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control
number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a
stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your
voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by
telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I hold through a nominee? |
|
A: |
|
If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker,
bank or other nominee, you will receive material from that firm
asking how you want to vote. You can complete the firms
voting form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers
telephone or Internet voting, the voting form will contain
instructions on how to access those voting methods. If you do
not provide your broker, bank or nominee with instructions on
how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee will
not be permitted to vote your shares on the merger agreement,
which will have the same effect as voting against the adoption
and approval of the merger agreement. Therefore, you should be
sure to provide your broker, bank or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
|
If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the
special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an
account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you
beneficially owned the shares on March 2, 2006, the record
date for voting. |
|
2
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I hold in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan? |
|
|
A: |
|
If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as
you direct through your voting instructions via telephone,
Internet or the enclosed proxy voting instruction card to
T. Rowe Price Trust Company, as trustee. Your proxy voting
instruction card (or any revocation of your prior proxy
voting instruction card) must be received by the trustee by
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 29, 2006. If the
trustee does not receive timely voting instructions from you,
the trustee will vote all shares in the retirement savings plan
for which it did not receive voting directions in the same
proportion as the votes of the retirement savings plan shares
for which it received timely voting directions from other
participants in the retirement savings plan. |
|
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I submitted my proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your
vote in one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at
the special meeting: |
|
|
|
|
submit to the Secretary of EMJ a revocation letter
with a later date than your proxy card; |
|
|
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, on March 30, 2006, a second completed and signed
proxy card dated later than the first signed proxy card; |
|
|
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 30, 2006, by
telephone or the Internet; or |
|
|
|
|
attend the special meeting and vote in person. |
|
|
|
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee,
you may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing such
firm in accordance with the firms procedures. |
|
|
|
If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you
must: |
|
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on March 29, 2006, a second completed and signed proxy
voting instruction card dated later than the first signed
proxy voting instruction card; or |
|
|
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 29, 2006, by
telephone or the Internet. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Do I need to attend the special meeting in person? |
|
A: |
|
No. It is not necessary for you to attend the special
meeting to vote your shares if EMJ has previously received your
proxy, although you are welcome to attend. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my EMJ stock certificates with my proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please do not send your EMJ stock certificates
with your proxy card. After the merger is completed,
Computershare Investor Services, acting as our exchange/paying
agent, will send you instructions (including a letter of
transmittal) explaining how to exchange your shares of EMJ
common stock for the appropriate number of shares of Reliance
common stock and cash. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting
instruction card for the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
This may mean that your shares of EMJ common stock are held in
different ways or in more than one account. Please complete,
sign, date and return by one of the methods described herein all
proxy cards or proxy voting instruction cards you receive to
ensure that all of your shares of EMJ common stock are voted at
the special meeting. |
How to Get More Information
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about Reliance and EMJ? |
|
|
A: |
|
Much of the business and financial information about Reliance
and EMJ that may be important to you is not included in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Instead, this information is
incorporated by reference to documents separately filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, by |
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance and EMJ. This means that Reliance and EMJ may satisfy
their disclosure obligations to you by referring you to
documents separately filed with the SEC by them. See Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 116,
for a list of documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus and for
instructions on how to obtain copies of these documents. Note
that among the documents incorporated by reference will be
Reliances Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which is expected to be
available on the SECs and Reliances Websites on
March 15, 2006. The documents are available to you without
charge. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Whom do I call if I have questions about the merger or the
special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the merger or the special
meeting or if you need additional copies of this proxy
statement/ prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should
contact EMJs Secretary, William S. Johnson, at
(323) 567-1122. |
4
SUMMARY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS
This summary highlights information from this proxy
statement/ prospectus and may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. Accordingly, Reliance and EMJ
encourage you to carefully read this entire proxy statement/
prospectus, including the Annexes, and the documents that are
incorporated by reference. You may obtain a copy of the
documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated by reference
without charge by following the instructions in the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 116 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
We have included page references in this summary to direct you
to more complete descriptions of the topics presented in this
summary.
The Companies
|
|
|
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company (page 91) |
|
|
10650 Alameda Street |
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
|
(323) 567-1122 |
EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of
Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined
two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and
Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company,
founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these
two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Earle M.
Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding, a holding company
formed for the sole purpose of acquiring EMJ. On April 20,
2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial restructuring,
pursuant to which Holding was merged with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ with such subsidiary surviving
the merger.
EMJ is a leading distributor of metal bar and tubular products
used by North American manufacturing companies and has been in
business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over 25,000
different metal products in large quantities from primary
producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless
steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells
these metal products in smaller quantities to over
35,000 customers spanning various industries, including
machine tools, industrial equipment, transportation, fluid
power, oil, gas and energy, fabricated metal, and construction
and agricultural equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of
metal products and provides its customers value-added metal
processing and inventory management services from its
distribution network of 39 strategically located service and
processing centers in the United States and Canada.
EMJs revenues for the year ended March 31, 2005 and
the nine months ended December 30, 2005 were approximately
$1.6 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, and its
net income for the same periods was approximately
$97.5 million and $59.6 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (page 92) |
|
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
(213) 687-7700 |
Reliance was founded in 1939 in Los Angeles, California and
began as a fabricator of steel reinforcing bar. Today, Reliance
is one of the five largest metals service center companies in
the United States. Reliances network of 24 divisions, 21
operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company, operates more
than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium and South
Korea. Through its 70%-owned company, Reliance has entered into
an agreement to acquire a facility in the Peoples Republic
of China. Through this network, Reliance provides metals
processing services and distributes a full line of more than
90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper,
carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel
products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of
industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,
5
Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. One of Reliances
subsidiaries has a location in South Korea that serves the Asian
semiconductor market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service
center in Belgium in January 2003 to service the European
aerospace market.
Reliances net sales for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were
approximately $2.9 billion and $2.5 billion,
respectively. Reliances net income for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $169.7 million
and $144.8 million, respectively.
|
|
|
RSAC Acquisition Corp. |
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
(213) 687-7700 |
RSAC, a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Reliance, formed for the purpose of effecting the merger. RSAC
has engaged in no business activities to date and it has no
material assets or liabilities of any kind, other than those
incident to its formation and those incurred in connection with
the merger.
Structure of the Merger (page 75)
On January 17, 2006, EMJ, Reliance and RSAC entered into
the merger agreement, which is the legal document governing the
merger. Under the terms of the merger agreement, EMJ will merge
with and into RSAC, with RSAC continuing as the surviving
corporation. As part of the merger, RSACs name will be
changed to Earle M. Jorgensen Company and will remain a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon completion of the
merger, EMJ common stock will be cancelled and will no longer be
publicly traded.
The merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/
prospectus as Annex A. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to
carefully read the merger agreement in its entirety. For a
summary of the merger agreement, please see the section entitled
The Merger Agreement beginning on page 75 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
On January 17, 2006, the Kelso Funds (as defined in this
summary under Fairness Opinions, Opinion of
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 9 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus), holders of 50.1% of EMJs
outstanding common stock, entered into a voting agreement, or
the voting agreement, with Reliance providing that they would
vote, subject to certain exceptions, all of the shares of EMJ
common stock owned by them in favor of the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement.
The voting agreement is attached to this proxy statement/
prospectus as Annex B. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to
carefully read the voting agreement in its entirety. For a
summary of the voting agreement, please see the section entitled
The Voting Agreement beginning on page 90 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
What You Will Receive (page 75)
If we complete the merger, each EMJ stockholder will be entitled
to receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock that is to-be-determined for each outstanding share
of EMJ common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock
component will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to
adjustment based on the average closing price of Reliance common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the
20-day period ending
on, and including, the second trading day prior to the closing
6
of the merger, or the pricing period. If the average closing
price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be greater than $6.50 for each share of EMJ
common stock; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for
each share of EMJ common stock; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock. |
The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive
in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest
whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by
the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common
stock in the merger. Instead, you will receive cash from
Reliance, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance
common stock that you might otherwise have been entitled to
receive, based on the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special
meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger
consideration you will receive when the merger is completed.
Reliance will adjust the number of shares of Reliance common
stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common
stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period. If the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common
stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing price of
Reliance common stock during the pricing period; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own. |
Example 1: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $75.00, you will receive $650 plus
8 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to 0.0892). In addition, you will receive a cash
payment of $69.00 in lieu of the 0.92 shares of Reliance
common stock that you would have otherwise received.
Example 2: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $68.00, you will receive $650 plus
9 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to $6.50/$68.00). In addition, you will receive a
cash payment of $38.01 in lieu of the 0.559 shares of
Reliance common stock that you would have otherwise received.
Example 3: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $40.00, you will receive $650 plus
12 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to 0.1207). In addition, you will receive a cash
payment of $2.80 in lieu of the 0.07 shares of Reliance
common stock that you would have otherwise received.
We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate
prior to the merger. Therefore, the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period may be higher or
lower than the closing price of Reliance common stock on the
date of the merger agreement and the date of the special
meeting. In addition, because the exchange ratio is fixed at the
end of the second trading day before the closing of the merger,
the value of the Reliance common stock that you will receive in
the merger may
7
increase or decrease before the date we complete the merger. You
should obtain current stock price quotations for Reliance common
stock prior to voting on the merger.
Depending on the exchange ratio, and based upon
50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding as of
February 24, 2006, Reliance will issue a minimum of
4,481,148 and a maximum of 6,063,617 shares of common
stock. Therefore immediately after completion of the merger, EMJ
stockholders will hold a minimum of approximately 11.9% and a
maximum of approximately 15.5% of Reliances then
outstanding common stock.
Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was
granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc.
Option Plan, or Holding option plan, which was assumed by EMJ in
April 2005, will be converted into the right to receive an
amount, if any, equal to (1) the difference between
(a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise
price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common
stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable
withholding of taxes.
Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was
granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Company 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan, or EMJ incentive plan, will be converted into an
option to purchase Reliance common stock and will continue to be
governed by the terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related
grant agreements under which they were granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to a new
Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number
of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option
and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole
share; and |
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to
the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise
price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option
divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest
cent. |
The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange
ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in
the merger multiplied by two to account for the fact that cash
consideration will not be paid for these options.
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors
(page 52)
After careful consideration, EMJs board of directors
determined that the merger agreement and the merger are
advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders
and unanimously approved the merger agreement. Accordingly,
EMJs board of directors unanimously recommends that
stockholders vote FOR the adoption and
approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
EMJs Reasons for the Merger (page 50)
EMJs board of directors believes that this merger will
create an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled,
tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and
aluminum products. EMJs board of directors based its
decision to approve the merger agreement on many factors
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the premium offered for the shares of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders
than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its
stockholders; |
|
|
|
its belief that Reliance would be able to complete the
transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations; |
|
|
|
its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not
likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near
future if EMJ continued as an independent company; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to
the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be
able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction
to the Reliance common stock; |
|
|
|
the market position of the combined company; |
|
|
|
the financial presentation and opinion of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, or Credit Suisse; and |
|
|
|
the financial presentation and opinion of Duff & Phelps
Securities, LLC, or Duff & Phelps. |
For a summary of the factors considered by EMJs board of
directors in making its decision to approve the merger agreement
and recommend its adoption and approval to the EMJ stockholders,
please see the section entitled The Merger
EMJs Reasons for the Merger and The
Merger Recommendation of EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 52 of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Fairness Opinions
|
|
|
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors (page 52) |
In connection with the merger, Credit Suisse delivered a written
opinion to EMJs board of directors that the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and Kelso Investment
Associates, L.P., or KIA I, Kelso Equity
Partners II, L.P., or KEP II,
KIA III-Earle M. Jorgensen, L.P., or KIA III-EMJ,
and Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P., or KIA IV,
collectively referred to as the Kelso Funds, and their
respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders. The full text of Credit
Suisses written opinion, dated January 17, 2006, is
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex C. We
encourage you to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety
for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken.
Credit Suisses opinion was provided to EMJs board
of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger
consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger
and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger.
|
|
|
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors (page 57) |
In connection with the merger, Duff & Phelps delivered
a written opinion to EMJs board of directors that the
consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and the Kelso Funds
and their respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a
financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of
Duff & Phelps written opinion, dated
January 17, 2006, is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex D. We encourage you to read
this opinion carefully and in its entirety for a description of
the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered
and limitations on the review undertaken. Duff &
Phelps opinion was provided to EMJs board of
directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger
consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger
and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger.
The EMJ Special Meeting (page 41)
The special meeting will be held on March 31, 2006, at
9:00 a.m., local time, at EMJs headquarters located
at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California.
9
You will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt
the merger agreement.
If you own shares of EMJ common stock at the close of business
on March 2, 2006, referred to as the record date, you will
be entitled to vote at the special meeting. You have one vote
for each share of EMJ common stock owned on the record date. As
of February 24, 2006, the latest practicable date before
the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, there were
50 stockholders of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on
the records of EMJs transfer agent.
Adoption and approval of the merger agreement requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
EMJ common stock outstanding on the record date. As a condition
to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance required the
Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately 50.1% of the
EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a voting agreement
to vote all of their shares in favor of adoption and approval of
the merger agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is
terminated in accordance with its terms, the merger agreement
will be adopted and approved at the special meeting regardless
of the votes of any other stockholders.
|
|
|
Interests of EMJs Directors and Executive Officers
(page 68) |
In considering EMJs board of directors
recommendation, EMJ stockholders should be aware that some
officers, directors, and other key employees of EMJ have
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, those of EMJ stockholders generally, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to an existing retention agreement between EMJ and
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., the chief executive officer and a
director of EMJ, Mr. Nelson is entitled to a bonus of
$3 million if his employment with EMJ is terminated for
good reason, which includes ongoing diminution in his title,
duties or responsibilities or a material reduction in his base
salary or benefits. Mr. Nelsons employment as chief
executive officer will terminate for good reason (as defined in
his retention agreement) upon completion of the merger and he
will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million
six months after completion of the merger. |
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, William S. Johnson, the vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary of EMJ, entered
into a retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment
and severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless
terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement provides generally
that his terms and conditions of employment (including position,
responsibility, location, compensation and benefits) will not be
adversely changed during the term of the agreement and provides
for certain minimum guaranteed compensation levels (including
base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentives and
participation in benefit plans) during such term. If he remains
employed by EMJ, Mr. Johnson will receive bonuses of
approximately $425,000 and $200,000 at the six-month and
twelve-month anniversaries of the effective date of the merger,
respectively. |
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors approved
a special bonus plan for senior management providing that,
immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a
taxable bonus to certain members of EMJs senior management
in connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be
allocated to such members of EMJs senior management as
determined by EMJs board of directors. |
|
|
|
The Kelso Funds and their affiliates, including Mr. Nickell
and Mr. Wahrhaftig who are directors of EMJ, hold
25,205,133 shares of EMJs common stock, of those
shares, 25,174,634 shares are held by the Kelso Funds
representing 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of
EMJs common stock. The Kelso Funds have entered into the
voting agreement with Reliance pursuant to |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
which they have agreed to vote the shares of EMJ common stock
held by them in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement. Upon completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and
their affiliates will receive aggregate merger consideration
consisting of approximately $163.8 million in cash and
2,248,297 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the
average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the
pricing period is equal to $79.89, which would be the average
closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended
on February 22, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Reliance entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as
of January 17, 2006, or the registration rights agreement,
with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days of the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to
the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds
in the merger. |
|
|
|
EMJs executive officers participate in EMJs
retirement savings plan and EMJs executive officers and
some of EMJs directors participate in EMJs equity
plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon
completion of the merger, executive officers and certain
directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as
the other stockholders of EMJ for their EMJ common stock, they
will receive options to purchase Reliance common stock for their
EMJ stock options under the EMJ stock incentive plan and cash in
exchange for their options outstanding under the Holding option
plan. They will receive cash for their Holding options as
follows: Mr. Nelson will receive approximately
$16.8 million, Mr. Roderick will receive approximately
$1.7 million, each of Messrs. Rutledge and Marquard
will receive approximately $678,000, each of
Messrs. McCaffery, Travetto, Henry and Hoffman will receive
approximately $1.58 million and Mr. Johnson will
receive approximately $1.13 million. |
|
|
|
EMJs executive officers and directors will be entitled to
continued indemnification and certain liability insurance
coverage under the merger agreement. |
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements
(page 71)
Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash
consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ
stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately
4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its common stock
and assume approximately $286 million of EMJs debt
(based on EMJs outstanding indebtedness as of
December 30, 2005).
Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the
consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders
in the merger, as well as expenses of the transaction, through a
combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on its
existing revolving credit facility. Reliance has obtained all
necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to
complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a
condition precedent to Reliances obligation to effect the
merger.
Conditions to Closing (page 85)
The completion of the merger depends on the satisfaction or
waiver of a number of conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption and approval of the merger agreement by holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period (or
any extension) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, or the HSR Act, and
related rules, which expired on February 21, 2006; |
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all other governmental agency consents,
approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to
complete the merger other than those which if not made or
obtained would not render the merger illegal; |
|
|
|
the absence of any legal prohibitions against the merger; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
shares of Reliance common stock to be issued pursuant to the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
EMJs and Reliances representations and warranties
being true and correct as of the date of the completion of the
merger, except where the failure of such representations and
warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse
effect; |
|
|
|
the performance by each of EMJ and Reliance of its agreements,
covenants and obligations under the merger agreement, in all
material respects; and |
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect on EMJ or Reliance. |
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 82)
EMJ, Reliance and RSAC may mutually agree in writing to
terminate the merger agreement at any time before completing the
merger, even after EMJs stockholders have adopted it. The
merger agreement may also be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger under specified circumstances,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if the merger is not completed by
June 2, 2006, unless the failure is the result of a willful
and material breach of the merger agreement by the party seeking
to terminate the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if any governmental entity issues a
final order preventing the merger; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the
merger agreement at the special meeting; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if the other party to the merger
agreement has breached or failed to perform in any material
respect any of its representations, warranties or covenants, the
breach would give rise to a failure of a condition to the
terminating partys obligation to close, and the breach
cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days of written
notice of such breach to the non-breaching party; |
|
|
|
|
by Reliance, if EMJs board of directors has
(1) withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of
the merger agreement or the merger or (2) recommended to
EMJ stockholders any takeover proposal (as described in the
section entitled The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation beginning on page 80 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus) other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
|
|
by EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ has determined to accept a superior
proposal (as described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement No Solicitation beginning on
page 80 of this proxy statement/ prospectus). |
|
Termination Fee to be Paid by EMJ (page 83)
EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors (1) withdrawing or adversely
modifying its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the
merger agreement and the merger or (2) recommending a
takeover proposal other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors accepting a superior proposal. |
12
EMJ Prohibited From Soliciting Other Offers (page 80)
Except in connection with the exercise by EMJs board of
directors of its fiduciary duties, the merger agreement provides
that EMJ will not, and will not permit its directors, officers,
employees or other representatives and agents to:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate, negotiate, knowingly encourage or knowingly
facilitate the submission of any takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take
any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of
any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any takeover proposal. |
Any violation of these solicitation restrictions may result in
Reliance having the ability to terminate the merger agreement
and receive termination fees as described below. However, prior
to the special meeting, if EMJ receives an unsolicited bona fide
written takeover proposal by a third party that EMJs board
of directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of
its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, to be or to
reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal, EMJ is
permitted, subject to additional limitations, to furnish
information about its business to the third party, engage in
discussions and negotiations with the third party and take and
disclose to EMJs stockholders a position with respect to
the takeover proposal.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and
Reliance (page 73)
All shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in
connection with the merger will be freely transferable unless
you are considered an affiliate of either EMJ or
Reliance for the purposes of the Securities Act at the time the
merger agreement is submitted to EMJ stockholders for adoption
and approval, in which case you will be permitted to sell the
shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in the merger
only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act. This proxy statement/ prospectus does not register the
resale of stock held by affiliates, and the merger agreement
does not obligate Reliance to file a registration statement for
this purpose.
Reliance entered into the registration rights agreement with the
Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will, within ten days of
the closing of the merger, prepare and file a registration
statement under the Securities Act at Reliances expense,
covering all or a portion of the shares of Reliance common stock
that the Kelso Funds receive in the merger. Pursuant to the
registration rights agreement, Reliance will also provide the
Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration
rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock
received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger (page 72)
Under the HSR Act, the merger cannot be completed until the
expiration or earlier termination of a waiting period that
follows the filing of notification forms by both parties to the
merger with the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust
Division of the Department of Justice. Reliance and EMJ
submitted their respective notification and report forms on
January 20, 2006. The waiting period expired on
February 21, 2006.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
(page 87)
In order for the merger to occur, Reliance must receive an
opinion from Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, tax counsel to
Reliance, and EMJ must receive an opinion from Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP, tax counsel to EMJ, to the effect that, based upon
current law and certain other customary assumptions, the merger
will qualify as a tax-deferred reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the merger qualifies as a
tax-deferred
13
reorganization, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, (1) EMJ generally will not recognize gain or loss
as a result of the merger and (2) EMJ stockholders
generally will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the
merger except to the extent of (a) cash received by them in
exchange for their shares of EMJ common stock and (b) cash
received by them in lieu of fractional Reliance common shares.
You may, however, recognize a taxable gain or loss when you
dispose of any Reliance common shares that you receive as a
result of the merger. The tax opinions of Lord,
Bissell & Brook LLP, and Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP are
subject to certain assumptions and qualifications, including but
not limited to the accuracy of certain factual representations
made by Reliance and EMJ. These tax opinions are not binding on
the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, or any court and do
not preclude the IRS or any court from adopting a contrary
position. The federal income tax consequences described in this
proxy statement/ prospectus may not apply to all EMJ
stockholders. Your tax consequences will depend on your own
situation. You are urged to consult your tax advisor so as to
fully understand the tax consequences of the merger to you.
Accounting Treatment (page 73)
The merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders (page 114)
Under Delaware law, if you do not vote for adoption of the
merger agreement and you comply with other statutory
requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law, you may
elect to receive, in cash, the judicially determined fair value
of your shares of stock in lieu of the merger consideration
provided for under the merger agreement.
Merely voting against the merger will not protect your rights to
an appraisal, which requires completion of all the steps
provided under Delaware law. The requirements under Delaware law
for exercising appraisal rights are described in the section
entitled Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders
beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The relevant section of Delaware law regarding appraisal rights
is reproduced and attached as Annex E to this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
If you vote for the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement, you will waive your rights to seek appraisal of your
shares of EMJ common stock under Delaware law.
Comparative Market Prices and Dividends (page 25)
Both Reliance and EMJ common stock trade on the New York Stock
Exchange. Reliance is listed under the trading symbol
RS and EMJ is listed under the trading symbol
JOR. On January 17, 2006, the last trading day
before the public announcement of the signing of the merger
agreement, Reliance common stock closed at $65.75 per share
and EMJ common stock closed at $10.43 per share.
On February 24, 2006, the most recent practicable date
prior to the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, Reliance
common stock closed at $87.60 per share and EMJ common
stock closed at $14.50 per share.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates (page 77)
Following the effective time of the merger, a letter of
transmittal will be mailed by the exchange/paying agent to all
holders of EMJ common stock containing instructions for
surrendering their certificates. Certificates should not be
surrendered until the letter of transmittal is received, fully
completed, and returned as instructed in the letter of
transmittal.
14
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
RELIANCE
The selected consolidated historical financial and other data
for Reliance set forth below as of and for the five years ended
December 31, 2004 are derived from Reliances
consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm. The selected consolidated historical financial
and other data set forth below as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005 are
derived from Reliances unaudited consolidated financial
statements. The results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for the full year or any other interim
period. Reliance management prepared the unaudited information
on the same basis as it prepared Reliances audited
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of Reliance
management, this information reflects all adjustments,
consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of this data for those dates. The consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
When you read this selected historical financial data, it is
important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is
qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements
and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Reliances annual report on
Form 10-K for 2004
and September 30, 2005 quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled Where You
Can Find More Information on page 116.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Income Statement
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,943,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,882,933 |
|
|
$ |
1,745,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,656,974 |
|
|
$ |
1,726,665 |
|
|
$ |
2,498,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,200,215 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,110,848 |
|
|
|
1,372,310 |
|
|
|
1,268,251 |
|
|
|
1,194,512 |
|
|
|
1,256,997 |
|
|
|
1,831,474 |
|
|
|
1,569,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
832,186 |
|
|
|
510,623 |
|
|
|
476,754 |
|
|
|
462,462 |
|
|
|
469,668 |
|
|
|
666,899 |
|
|
|
630,819 |
|
Operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
525,306 |
|
|
|
430,493 |
|
|
|
406,479 |
|
|
|
371,006 |
|
|
|
339,319 |
|
|
|
407,039 |
|
|
|
391,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
306,880 |
|
|
|
80,130 |
|
|
|
70,275 |
|
|
|
91,456 |
|
|
|
130,349 |
|
|
|
259,860 |
|
|
|
239,810 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(28,690 |
) |
|
|
(26,745 |
) |
|
|
(22,605 |
) |
|
|
(26,738 |
) |
|
|
(26,068 |
) |
|
|
(19,290 |
) |
|
|
(21,816 |
) |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
Amortization
expense(3)
|
|
|
(3,208 |
) |
|
|
(2,304 |
) |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
(8,641 |
) |
|
|
(7,411 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
(2,413 |
) |
Equity earnings of 50%-owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(9,182 |
) |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
(8,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
269,968 |
|
|
|
54,856 |
|
|
|
49,720 |
|
|
|
60,159 |
|
|
|
102,587 |
|
|
|
233,628 |
|
|
|
209,059 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(100,240 |
) |
|
|
(20,846 |
) |
|
|
(19,553 |
) |
|
|
(23,823 |
) |
|
|
(40,268 |
) |
|
|
(88,779 |
) |
|
|
(82,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
169,728 |
|
|
$ |
34,010 |
|
|
$ |
30,167 |
|
|
$ |
36,336 |
|
|
$ |
62,319 |
|
|
$ |
144,849 |
|
|
$ |
126,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
32,675 |
|
|
|
31,866 |
|
|
|
31,799 |
|
|
|
28,470 |
|
|
|
27,289 |
|
|
|
33,063 |
|
|
|
32,641 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,480 |
|
|
|
31,853 |
|
|
|
31,687 |
|
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
|
27,215 |
|
|
|
32,889 |
|
|
|
32,429 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(4)
|
|
$ |
343,285 |
|
|
$ |
118,471 |
|
|
$ |
100,871 |
|
|
$ |
119,234 |
|
|
$ |
156,747 |
|
|
$ |
287,724 |
|
|
$ |
264,021 |
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
121,768 |
|
|
|
107,820 |
|
|
|
90,638 |
|
|
|
104,038 |
|
|
|
25,803 |
|
|
|
165,168 |
|
|
|
31,170 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
35,982 |
|
|
|
20,909 |
|
|
|
18,658 |
|
|
|
24,539 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
34,314 |
|
|
|
27,695 |
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
As of September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
444,449 |
|
|
$ |
341,762 |
|
|
$ |
390,201 |
|
|
$ |
379,669 |
|
|
$ |
347,659 |
|
|
$ |
510,454 |
|
|
$ |
478,849 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,563,331 |
|
|
|
1,369,424 |
|
|
|
1,139,758 |
|
|
|
1,082,502 |
|
|
|
997,243 |
|
|
|
1,728,216 |
|
|
|
1,604,600 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
380,850 |
|
|
|
469,250 |
|
|
|
344,080 |
|
|
|
331,975 |
|
|
|
421,825 |
|
|
|
370,817 |
|
|
|
478,850 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
822,552 |
|
|
|
647,619 |
|
|
|
610,435 |
|
|
|
583,561 |
|
|
|
403,039 |
|
|
|
967,501 |
|
|
|
777,882 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include financial results of American Steel, L.L.C. for
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the period
January 1, 2002 to April 30, 2002 because Reliance
accounted for its 50% investment by the equity method, and
therefore Reliance excluded 50% of American Steels
earnings from its net income and earnings per share amounts.
Effective May 1, 2002, Reliance began consolidating
American Steels financial results due to an amendment to
American Steels operating agreement, which gave Reliance
50.5% of the ownership units and eliminated all super- majority
and unanimous voting rights, among other changes. |
|
(2) |
Operating expenses include warehouse, delivery, selling, general
and administrative expenses and depreciation expense. |
|
(3) |
Amortization expense included the amortization expense related
to goodwill in the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001. |
|
(4) |
EBITDA is defined as the sum of income before interest expense,
income taxes, depreciation expense and amortization of
intangibles (including goodwill). We believe that EBITDA is
commonly used as a measure of performance for companies in our
industry and is frequently used by analysts, investors, lenders
and other interested parties to evaluate a companys
financial performance and its ability to incur and service debt
while providing useful information. EBITDA should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for consolidated
statements of income and cash flows data prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and should not be construed as an indication of a
companys operating performance or as a measure of
liquidity. EBITDA as measured in this proxy statement/
prospectus is not necessarily comparable with similarly titled
measures for other companies. |
EBITDA Reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
269,968 |
|
|
$ |
54,856 |
|
|
$ |
49,720 |
|
|
$ |
60,159 |
|
|
$ |
102,587 |
|
|
$ |
233,628 |
|
|
$ |
209,059 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,690 |
|
|
|
26,745 |
|
|
|
22,605 |
|
|
|
26,738 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
19,290 |
|
|
|
21,816 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
44,627 |
|
|
|
36,870 |
|
|
|
28,546 |
|
|
|
32,337 |
|
|
|
28,092 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
343,285 |
|
|
$ |
118,471 |
|
|
$ |
100,871 |
|
|
$ |
119,234 |
|
|
$ |
156,747 |
|
|
$ |
287,724 |
|
|
$ |
264,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
EMJ
The selected consolidated historical financial and other data
for EMJ set forth below as of and for the five years ended
March 31, 2005 are derived from EMJs consolidated
financial statements which have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The
selected consolidated historical financial and other data set
forth below as of and for the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and December 30, 2005 are derived
from EMJs unaudited consolidated financial statements. The
results of operations for the nine months ended
December 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for the full year or any other interim
period. EMJ management prepared the unaudited information on the
same basis as it prepared EMJs audited consolidated
financial statements. In the opinion of EMJ management, this
information reflects all adjustments, consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this
data for those dates. The consolidated financial statements were
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
When you read this selected historical financial data, it is
important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is
qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements
and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in EMJs annual report on
Form 10-K for 2005
and December 30, 2005 quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC, and incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled Where You
Can Find More Information on page 116.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
12/30/05 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,608,890 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,367 |
|
|
$ |
919,927 |
|
|
$ |
895,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,706 |
|
|
$ |
1,152,589 |
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
1,184,871 |
|
|
|
754,266 |
|
|
|
658,562 |
|
|
|
641,991 |
|
|
|
767,263 |
|
|
|
955,866 |
|
|
|
828,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
424,019 |
|
|
|
286,101 |
|
|
|
261,365 |
|
|
|
253,067 |
|
|
|
292,418 |
|
|
|
329,840 |
|
|
|
323,854 |
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
289,318 |
|
|
|
216,609 |
|
|
|
210,250 |
|
|
|
204,684 |
|
|
|
228,498 |
|
|
|
197,228 |
|
|
|
220,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
134,701 |
|
|
|
69,492 |
|
|
|
51,115 |
|
|
|
48,383 |
|
|
|
63,920 |
|
|
|
132,612 |
|
|
|
103,763 |
|
Net interest
expense(2)
|
|
|
75,760 |
|
|
|
89,927 |
|
|
|
82,486 |
|
|
|
72,433 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
41,413 |
|
|
|
61,976 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit)(3)
|
|
|
(38,562 |
) |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
31,574 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss)
|
|
$ |
97,503 |
|
|
$ |
(23,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
59,625 |
|
|
$ |
38,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss) available to common stockholders
(3)(4)
|
|
$ |
91,993 |
|
|
$ |
(34,190 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,402 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,438 |
) |
|
$ |
59,625 |
|
|
$ |
32,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per
share(3)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
|
$ |
(2.96 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
5.73 |
|
|
$ |
(2.96 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,039 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
11,820 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
48,998 |
|
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,042 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
11,820 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
50,714 |
|
|
|
15,536 |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
12/30/05 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and tonnage data) | |
Pro forma information (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common
stockholders(6)
|
|
$ |
81,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders per
share(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
22,975 |
|
|
$ |
10,530 |
|
|
$ |
15,335 |
|
|
$ |
24,531 |
|
|
$ |
14,475 |
|
|
$ |
24,399 |
|
|
$ |
19,606 |
|
Purchase of stock, net
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
10,587 |
|
|
|
14,963 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,866 |
|
Other Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(8)
|
|
$ |
146,422 |
|
|
$ |
80,776 |
|
|
$ |
62,484 |
|
|
$ |
59,832 |
|
|
$ |
74,955 |
|
|
$ |
140,866 |
|
|
$ |
112,543 |
|
COLI
effect(9)
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
|
|
(2,374 |
) |
|
|
(3,275 |
) |
|
|
(3,804 |
) |
Revenues per
employee(10)
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
EBITDA per
employee(8)(10)
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Average number of employees
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Tons shipped
|
|
|
769,879 |
|
|
|
662,213 |
|
|
|
603,310 |
|
|
|
581,243 |
|
|
|
679,610 |
|
|
|
586,000 |
|
|
|
571,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
19,994 |
|
|
$ |
15,646 |
|
|
$ |
45,413 |
|
|
$ |
21,372 |
|
|
$ |
23,779 |
|
|
$ |
9,873 |
|
|
$ |
6,133 |
|
Total working capital
|
|
|
185,759 |
|
|
|
129,252 |
|
|
|
165,897 |
|
|
|
146,800 |
|
|
|
149,501 |
|
|
|
263,597 |
|
|
|
222,691 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
658,841 |
|
|
|
537,191 |
|
|
|
516,580 |
|
|
|
444,506 |
|
|
|
484,625 |
|
|
|
657,769 |
|
|
|
629,107 |
|
Total
debt(11)
|
|
|
516,889 |
|
|
|
535,111 |
|
|
|
543,077 |
|
|
|
471,376 |
|
|
|
420,064 |
|
|
|
285,896 |
|
|
|
592,630 |
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(186,173 |
) |
|
|
(273,295 |
) |
|
|
(245,171 |
) |
|
|
(202,690 |
) |
|
|
(160,197 |
) |
|
|
143,951 |
|
|
|
(241,014 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Expenses include restructuring charges aggregating $3,320 and
$1,861 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002
in connection with workforce reductions and consolidations and
losses from the sale of significant assets in those fiscal years
and a special compensation charge of $2,000 in connection with a
payment to EMJs chief executive officer in fiscal 2001. |
|
|
(2) |
Net interest expense includes amortization and write-off of debt
issue costs aggregating $1,482, $1,792, $1,416, $1,323, $1,756,
$989 and $988 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and December 30, 2005, respectively,
net of interest income of $1,179, $164, $394, $159, $40, $25 and
$154 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003,
2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004
and December 30, 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
(3) |
Income taxes for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004
primarily represent certain foreign and state taxes on income
due to the fact that a valuation allowance was established
against deferred tax assets. For fiscal year 2005 EMJ recognized
a tax benefit for the reduction of its valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets of $56,303. Income taxes for the first nine
months of fiscal 2006 represent the federal, state and Canadian
income taxes. |
|
18
|
|
|
(4) |
The adjustments to net income (loss) are approximately $(8,184),
$(9,897), $(9,730), $(10,628), $(5,510), $(5,510) and $0 for
fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months
ended December 31, 2004 and December 30, 2005,
respectively. The adjustments consist of dividends accrued for
the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding,
series A preferred stock and dividends declared and
paid-in-kind for the
Holding series B preferred stock. |
|
|
(5) |
The basic and diluted per share information is computed based on
the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for each reported period. The computation of diluted
per share information includes the dilutive effect of common
stock equivalents for outstanding options and warrants
exercisable for shares of common stock using the treasury stock
method. Upon completion of the merger and financial
restructuring in April 2005 all shares of Holding common stock
were converted to shares of EMJ common stock. The inclusion of
common stock equivalents for all periods presented prior to the
year ended March 31, 2005 was antidilutive. |
|
(6) |
The adjustments to pro forma net income available to common
stockholders include $(21,442) relating to the interest on the
Holding notes, $37,049 income tax benefit related to Holding and
$(5,510) dividends declared and
paid-in-kind for the
Holding series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
Reconciliation of pro forma net income available to common
stockholders of EMJ to reported income (loss) available to
common stockholders after giving effect to the merger and
financial restructuring on April 20, 2005 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Pro forma net income of EMJ
|
|
$ |
81,896 |
|
Adjustments for the effect of the merger and financial
restructuring:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on subordinated debt, net
|
|
|
(21,442 |
) |
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(5,510 |
) |
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
37,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income (loss) available to common stockholders
after giving effect to the merger and financial restructuring
|
|
$ |
91,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
The adjustments to pro forma basic per share information
reflects per share information as discussed in note 5,
above, and shares of EMJ common stock issued upon completion of
the merger and financial restructuring and initial public
offering as follows: 12,997,890 shares for the Holding
notes; 2,377,358 shares for the Holding series A
preferred stock; 1,409,751 shares for the Holding
series B preferred stock; 2,934,977 shares for the
Holding warrants; 12,038,898 weighted average shares for the
Holding common stock converted one to one in the merger and
financial restructuring to EMJ common stock; and
17,600,000 shares issued in the initial public offering.
The computation of pro forma diluted per share information
includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents for
outstanding options exercisable for shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
Change in shares from giving effect to the merger and financial
restructuring and the initial public offering: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except per | |
|
|
share data) | |
Holding common shares converted to EMJ common shares one-to-one
|
|
|
11,197 |
|
Exchange consideration for debt and equity securities
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
Initial public offering shares issued
|
|
|
17,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding at end of period if merger and
financial restructuring and initial public offering happened
during the period
|
|
|
48,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share based on historical net income of
EMJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Pro forma weighted outstanding shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,359 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,428 |
|
|
|
(8) |
EBITDA represents net income before net interest
expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization. Consistent with Item 10(e) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as |
19
|
|
|
amended, or the Securities Act,
EMJs EBITDA has not been adjusted to exclude any other
non-cash charges or liabilities, such as LIFO
(last-in-first-out)
adjustments of $887, $590, $(3,354), $14,343, $74,164, $42,505
and $9,677 and postretirement benefits aggregating $11, $249,
$498, $619, $822, $611 and $636 for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine
months ended December 31, 2004 and December 30, 2005,
respectively. In addition, EMJs EBITDA has not been
adjusted for the following items: provisions for workforce
reductions and consolidations and losses from the sale of
significant assets aggregating $3,320 and $1,861 for the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively; special
compensation of $2,000 payable to EMJs chief executive
officer in fiscal 2001; excise tax of $1,919 related to an IRS
settlement in fiscal 2002; and a loss of $12,278 related to
early retirement of debt in fiscal 2003. EMJ believes EBITDA is
useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities
analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
evaluation of company performance in the industry. EMJs
management believes that EBITDA is useful in evaluating
EMJs operating performance between periods and compared to
that of EMJs competitors because the calculation of EBITDA
generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes
and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions,
which items may vary between periods and for different companies
for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a
result, EMJs management uses EBITDA as a significant
component when measuring EMJs performance in connection
with determining incentive compensation. EBITDA is not a
recognized measure of operating income, financial performance or
liquidity under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The items excluded from EBITDA are significant
components in understanding and assessing financial performance.
Therefore, while providing useful information, EMJs EBITDA
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
consolidated statement of operations and cash flow data prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and should not be construed as an indication of a
companys operating performance or as a measure of
liquidity. In addition, it should be noted that companies
calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA as presented
for EMJ may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other
companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA for each of
the respective periods indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
12/30/05 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
97,503 |
|
|
$ |
(23,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
59,625 |
|
|
$ |
38,074 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,721 |
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
|
11,369 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
|
|
11,035 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
75,760 |
|
|
|
89,927 |
|
|
|
82,486 |
|
|
|
72,433 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
41,413 |
|
|
|
61,976 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(38,562 |
) |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
31,574 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
146,422 |
|
|
$ |
80,776 |
|
|
$ |
62,484 |
|
|
$ |
59,832 |
|
|
$ |
74,955 |
|
|
$ |
140,866 |
|
|
$ |
112,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) |
EMJ is the owner and beneficiary of life insurance policies, or
the COLI policies, on (1) all former non-union employees of
a predecessor company, including certain current employees of
EMJ, and (2) key man life insurance policies on certain
current and former executives of EMJ. The effect of these
company owned life insurance policies on EMJs pre-tax
income consists of premium expense, policy dividend growth, and
proceeds (death benefits) (which are reported as general and
administrative expense) and policy interest expense on policy
borrowings (which is reported as a component of interest
expense). Under current U.S. federal tax law, the policy |
20
|
|
|
|
|
dividend growth is not currently
taxable, the premium is non-deductible, the proceeds (death
benefits) are tax exempt and the interest is deductible up to
96% of the contract rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
12/30/05 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Calculation of COLI effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surrender value-policy dividend growth
|
|
$ |
22,200 |
|
|
$ |
17,751 |
|
|
$ |
17,156 |
|
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
|
$ |
13,752 |
|
|
$ |
15,381 |
|
Cash surrender value-insurance premiums
|
|
|
(3,661 |
) |
|
|
(3,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
(2,217 |
) |
|
|
(3,147 |
) |
|
|
(2,756 |
) |
Proceeds (death benefits)
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
4,631 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income impact of COLI
|
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
19,521 |
|
|
|
16,044 |
|
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
12,023 |
|
|
|
15,236 |
|
|
|
12,943 |
|
Cash surrender value-interest
|
|
|
(22,367 |
) |
|
|
(20,082 |
) |
|
|
(17,796 |
) |
|
|
(15,996 |
) |
|
|
(14,397 |
) |
|
|
(18,511 |
) |
|
|
(16,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax income impact of COLI
|
|
$ |
(861 |
) |
|
$ |
(561 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,752 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,275 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
Calculated based on the average number of employees during the
applicable period. |
|
|
(11) |
Long-term debt includes $149,880, $178,481, $212,540, $225,373,
$245,882, $245,882 and $0 for fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and
2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and
December 30, 2005, respectively, related to the Variable
Rate Senior Notes paid in cash and shares of EMJ common stock
upon completion of EMJs initial public offering on
April 20, 2005. |
|
21
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected unaudited pro forma combined financial
data has been derived from and should be read together with the
unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and related
notes on pages 93 through 99 of this proxy statement/
prospectus. This information is based on the historical
consolidated balance sheets and related historical consolidated
statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the
merger using the purchase method of accounting. The unaudited
pro forma balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 assumes
that the merger occurred as of that date. The unaudited pro
forma statements of income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the merger as if it had occurred
as of January 1 of each respective period.
This information is for illustrative purposes only. Reliance and
EMJ may have performed differently had they always been
combined. You should not rely on the selected unaudited pro
forma combined financial data as being indicative of the
historical results that would have been achieved had the
companies always been combined or the future results that
Reliance will experience after the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,811.6 |
|
|
$ |
4,417.7 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
315.0 |
|
Net income from continuing
operations(1)
|
|
|
177.5 |
|
|
|
186.8 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
5.03 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The twelve months ended December 31, 2004 amount is net of
$8.5 million of preferred dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,186.6 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations (less current
portions)
|
|
|
1,079.3 |
|
22
COMPARATIVE UNAUDITED PER SHARE DATA
Set forth below are net income, cash dividends and book value
per Reliance share and EMJ share on a historical basis, for
Reliance on a pro forma combined basis per share, and for
Reliance and on a pro forma combined basis per EMJ-equivalent
share. The assumed exchange ratio is 0.0892 Reliance shares for
each EMJ share as the average closing prices of Reliance common
stock during the 20-day
period ended February 22, 2006 ($79.89) exceeded the
maximum price for calculation of the exchange ratio. You should
note that this exchange ratio, and thus the amount of Reliance
common stock to be issued in the merger, may increase or
decrease depending on the average closing prices of Reliance
common stock for the pricing period prior to the effective time
of the merger.
The Reliance pro forma combined data was derived by combining
the historical consolidated financial information of Reliance
and the historical consolidated financial information of EMJ
using the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations as described under Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Information beginning on page 93.
The Reliance pro forma combined data per EMJ-equivalent common
share shows the effect of the merger from the perspective of an
EMJ stockholder. The information was computed by multiplying the
Reliance pro forma combined earnings per share, cash dividends
and book value by the assumed exchange ratio of 0.0892.
You should read the information below together with the
historical financial statements and related notes contained in
the annual reports and quarterly reports that EMJ and Reliance
have filed with the SEC and have incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement/ prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information on page 116. The unaudited pro forma
combined data below is for illustrative purposes only and is
based on available information and assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable as of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus. The financial results may have been different had
the companies always been combined due to, among other factors,
those factors discussed under Risk Factors beginning
on page 30. You should not rely on this information as
being indicative of the historical results that would have been
achieved had the companies always been combined or the future
results that Reliance will experience after the merger. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 28.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended, | |
|
Ended, | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reliance historical per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(1)
|
|
|
29.33 |
|
|
|
25.18 |
|
EMJ historical per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(2)
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
(21.43 |
) |
Reliance pro forma per Reliance common share combined
data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(3)
|
|
|
35.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance pro forma per EMJ-equivalent common share combined
data:(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of period
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The historical book value per share is computed by dividing
shareholders equity by the number of common shares
outstanding at the end of each period presented. |
|
(2) |
The historical book value per share is computed by dividing
stockholders equity by the number of common shares
outstanding at the end of each period presented. |
|
|
(3) |
The pro forma combined book value per share is computed by
dividing pro forma stockholders equity by the pro forma
number of shares outstanding at the end of the period, assuming
the issuance of 4,481,148 Reliance common shares in the merger. |
|
|
|
(4) |
The equivalent pro forma per share information is computed
assuming an exchange ratio of 0.0892 Reliance common share per
common share of EMJ. This exchange ratio does not take into
consideration the cash portion of the merger consideration of
$6.50 per share. |
|
24
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Comparative Market Prices
Reliance common stock is listed on the NYSE and traded under the
symbol RS. The following table sets forth, for the
calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading
prices per share of Reliance common stock on the NYSE Composite
Transactions reporting system based on closing prices and cash
dividends declared per share of Reliance common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 24, 2006)
|
|
$ |
87.60 |
|
|
$ |
62.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
66.64 |
|
|
|
49.15 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
52.93 |
|
|
|
37.52 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
43.62 |
|
|
|
35.04 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
47.36 |
|
|
|
36.29 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
41.90 |
|
|
|
33.72 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
41.89 |
|
|
|
36.33 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
40.32 |
|
|
|
31.96 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
35.95 |
|
|
|
27.39 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low
sales prices of shares of Reliance common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange were $66.12 and $64.84,
respectively. On February 24, 2006, the last full trading
day before the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the
high and low sale prices of shares of Reliance common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $87.78 and $85.65,
respectively.
EMJ closed its initial public offering of
17.6 million shares of EMJ common stock on
April 20, 2005. All of the shares were sold by EMJ.
EMJs common stock began trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on April 15, 2005, under the ticker symbol
JOR. The following table sets forth, for the
calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading
prices per EMJ share on the NYSE Composite Transactions
reporting system based on closing prices and cash dividends
declared per EMJ share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 24, 2006)
|
|
$ |
14.50 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter (beginning April 15, 2005)
|
|
|
9.20 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low
sales prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange were $10.49 and $10.19, respectively. On
February 24, 2006, the last full trading day
25
before the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the high
and low sale prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange were $14.50 and $14.21,
respectively.
Reliance shareholders and EMJ stockholders are advised to obtain
current market quotations for Reliance common stock and EMJ
common stock. The market price of Reliance common stock and
EMJ common stock will fluctuate between the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and the completion of the merger. No
assurance can be given concerning the market price of
(1) Reliance common stock before or after the effective
date of the merger or (2) EMJ common stock before the
effective date of the merger.
|
|
|
EMJ Equivalent Per Share Price |
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement, and
February 24, 2006, the most recent practicable day before
the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the equivalent
price per share of EMJ common stock was $13.00 and $14.31,
respectively. The equivalent price per share of EMJ common stock
is equal to the aggregate merger consideration that an EMJ
stockholder would have received for one share of EMJ common
stock if the merger had taken place on those dates. We
calculated these equivalent numbers by multiplying the closing
market price per share of Reliance common stock on these dates
by an assumed exchange ratio of 0.1026 and 0.0892, respectively,
and adding the per share cash payment of $6.50. We have based
these assumed exchange ratios on the average closing price of
Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange during the
20 consecutive trading days ended January 12, 2006 and
February 22, 2006, respectively. You should note that this
exchange ratio may increase depending on the average closing
prices of Reliance common stock during the pricing period prior
to the merger and the actual value of Reliance common stock that
an EMJ stockholder will receive upon completion of the merger
may be higher or lower than the prices above. As a result, you
should obtain current market quotations for Reliance common
stock and EMJ common stock before making any decision about the
merger.
Dividends
Reliance has paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock
for 46 years. Reliances board of directors has
increased the quarterly dividend rate on a periodic basis. The
Reliance board of directors may reconsider or revise this policy
from time to time based on conditions then existing, including
Reliances earnings, cash flows, financial condition and
capital requirements or other factors the Reliance board of
directors may deem relevant. Reliance expects to continue to
declare and pay dividends in the future, if earnings are
available to pay dividends, but Reliance also intends to
continue to retain a portion of earnings for reinvestment in its
operations and expansion of its business. There can be no
assurance that either cash or stock dividends will be paid in
the future or that, if paid, the dividends will be in the same
amount or with the same frequency as paid in the past.
The private placement debt agreements for Reliances senior
notes and Reliances syndicated credit facility contain
covenants which, among other things, require Reliance to
maintain a minimum net worth and limit cash dividends based upon
Reliances earnings, restricting its ability to pay
dividends. Since Reliances initial public offering in
September 1994 through December 31, 2004, Reliance has paid
between 5% and 25% of earnings to its shareholders as dividends.
Since July 2004, Reliance has increased the quarterly dividend
by 67% to $.10 per share, from $.06 per share.
EMJ has not paid any dividends since its initial public offering
in April 2005 and has no plans to pay cash dividends on its
common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, EMJs
domestic credit facility prohibits EMJ from paying, and the
indenture for EMJs
93/4% senior
secured notes, or the
93/4%
notes, limits EMJs ability to pay, dividends. Prior to
EMJs initial public offering, EMJ had not paid a stock
dividend since its formation on May 3, 1990. Prior to
EMJs initial offering, EMJ paid cash dividends to
26
its former parent Holding only in connection with specific
obligations of Holding from time to time, including,
(1) the payment of interest on indebtedness of Holding,
(2) the repurchase of Holdings capital stock from
employees of EMJ whose employment had terminated, as required
under the terms of Holdings stockholders agreement (which
terminated upon completion of EMJs merger and financial
restructuring and EMJs initial public offering), and
EMJs stock bonus plan (predecessor to the retirement
savings plan), and (3) redemption of stock options from
Mr. Nelson, EMJs chief executive officer, and a
terminated employee.
Following the merger, the former holders of EMJ common stock
will be entitled to receive dividends in respect of the shares
of Reliance common stock they receive as merger consideration as
may be declared by Reliances board of directors.
27
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained or incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement/ prospectus that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as
believe, estimate, intend,
may, expect, anticipate,
predict, project, counting
on, plan, continue,
want, forecast, should,
would, is confident and will
and similar expressions as they relate to Reliance or EMJ are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to
predict. Except to the extent required by federal securities
laws, neither Reliance nor EMJ undertakes any obligation to
publicly release the result of any revisions to any such
forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations, including, but not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized
or realized within the expected time frame, and costs or
expenses relating to the merger may be higher than expected; |
|
|
|
Revenues or margins following the merger may be lower than
expected; |
|
|
|
Costs or difficulties related to obtaining regulatory approvals
for and to completing the merger and, following the merger, to
the integration of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ may be
greater than expected; |
|
|
|
Synergies and accretion to reported earnings estimated to result
from the merger may not be realized and the level of costs and
expenses incurred by Reliance in connection with the merger may
be higher than expected; |
|
|
|
Reliances future operating results depend on a number of
factors beyond its control, such as the prices for and the
availability of metals, which could cause its results to
fluctuate significantly over time. During periods of low
customer demand, it could be more difficult for Reliance to pass
through price increases to its customers, which could reduce its
gross profit and net income; |
|
|
|
Changes in demand for the products that Reliance sells can cause
significant fluctuations in both availability and cost of the
products. A significant or rapid increase or decrease in costs
from current levels could have a severe negative impact on
Reliances gross profit; |
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rates could change, which could affect
the price Reliance pays for metals and the results of its
foreign operations; |
|
|
|
Reliance services industries that are highly cyclical, and any
downturn in its customers industries could reduce its
revenue and profitability; |
|
|
|
The success of Reliances business is affected by general
economic conditions and, accordingly, its business was adversely
impacted by the economic slowdown or recession in 2003, 2002 and
2001. This could occur in future periods; |
|
|
|
Reliances business is very competitive and increased
competition could reduce gross profit margins and net income; |
|
|
|
As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both senior
management and its operating employees. If Reliance is unable to
attract and retain these individuals, its results of operations
may decline; |
|
|
|
Interest rates on debt could increase; Reliances variable
rate debt is currently at relatively low historical levels and
rates, and it anticipates that these levels will increase
materially at closing and rates will continue to increase
through 2006; |
|
|
|
Reliance may not be able to consummate future acquisitions, and
those acquisitions that it does complete may be difficult to
integrate into its business; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance is subject to various environmental and other
governmental regulations which may require it to expend
significant capital and incur substantial costs; |
|
|
|
If existing shareholders sell their shares, the market price of
the Reliance common stock could be depressed; |
|
|
|
Principal shareholders who own a significant number of
Reliances shares may have interests that conflict with
yours; |
|
|
|
Reliance has implemented a staggered or classified board of
directors that may adversely impact your rights as a shareholder; |
|
|
|
Reliance may discover internal control deficiencies in its
decentralized operations or in an acquisition that must be
reported in its SEC filings, which may result in a negative
reaction by its shareholders that adversely impacts its stock
price; |
|
|
|
Reliances acquisitions, including EMJ, might fail to
perform as anticipated, which could result in an impairment
charge to write off some or all of the goodwill for that
entity; and |
|
|
|
Other economic, business, competitive or regulatory factors may
affect Reliances and EMJs businesses generally as
described in Reliances and EMJs filings with the SEC. |
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to Reliance or EMJ or persons acting on their
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
foregoing. New risks and uncertainties may arise from time to
time. We cannot predict these events or how they might impact
us. See Risk Factors beginning on page 30 of
this proxy statement/prospectus.
29
RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to the Merger
|
|
|
Because the market price of Reliance common stock may
fluctuate, you cannot be certain of the precise value of the
merger consideration you will receive in the merger. |
You cannot be certain of the precise value of the consideration
to be received as a result of the merger. If the merger is
completed, you will be entitled to receive, for each share of
EMJ common stock that you own, $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892
and 0.1207 of a share of newly-issued Reliance common stock,
depending on the average closing price of Reliance common stock
for the pricing period. The exchange ratio will adjust to ensure
that the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you
receive will be equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing
price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period so long as
the average Reliance stock price is equal to or between $72.86
and $53.86. However, the market value of that fraction of a
share of Reliance common stock you receive may have a value that
is greater or less than $6.50, as the trading price of Reliance
common stock on the date of the merger may be greater or less
than the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period used to determine the exchange ratio. If the
average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing
period is less than $53.86, the exchange ratio will no longer
adjust upward, and you will receive 0.1207 of a share of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own. This means that the value of the fraction of a share of
Reliance common stock you will receive will be below $6.50 to
the extent the market price of Reliance common stock is below
$53.86 when the merger is completed. If, however, the average
closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is
more than $72.86, the exchange ratio will no longer adjust
downward, and you will receive 0.0892 of a share of Reliance
common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own.
This means that the value of the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock you will receive will be above $6.50 to the extent
the market price of Reliance common stock is above $72.86 when
the merger is completed. The formula for calculating the
exchange ratio is set forth in the section entitled The
Merger Agreement Merger Consideration
beginning on page 75 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The prices of EMJ common stock and Reliance common stock at the
closing of the merger may vary from their respective prices on
the date the merger agreement was signed, on the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and on the date of the special
meeting. For example, (1) during 2005 and 2006 (from
April 15, 2005, when it commenced trading on the New York
Stock Exchange, through January 17, 2006, the last trading
day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices
of EMJ common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged from a
low closing sale price of $6.70 per share to a high closing
sale price of $10.69 per share and (2) during 2004,
2005 and 2006 (through January 17, 2006, the last trading
day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices
of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged
from a low closing sale price of $27.39 per share to a high
closing sale price of $67.06 per share. These variations
may be the result of various factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the business, operations or prospects of Reliance,
EMJ or the combined company; |
|
|
|
governmental, regulatory and/or litigation developments; |
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the merger will be
completed; |
|
|
|
the timing of completion of the merger; and |
|
|
|
general stock market, economic and political conditions. |
You are urged to obtain a current market quotation for Reliance
common stock.
|
|
|
EMJ will be subject to business uncertainties and
contractual restrictions while the merger is pending. |
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees,
customers and suppliers may have an adverse effect on EMJ and
consequently on Reliance. These uncertainties may impair
EMJs ability to retain and motivate key personnel until
the merger is completed, and could cause customers, suppliers and
30
others that deal with EMJ to defer purchases or other decisions
affecting EMJ, or to seek to change existing business
relationships with EMJ. If key employees depart because of
uncertainty about their future roles and the potential
complexities of integration, the combined companys
business following the merger could be harmed. In addition, the
merger agreement restricts EMJ from making certain acquisitions
and taking other specified actions without the consent of
Reliance until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent
EMJ from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may
arise prior to the completion of the merger. See the section
entitled The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation beginning on page 80 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus for a description of the restrictive
covenants applicable to EMJ.
|
|
|
Failure to complete the merger could negatively affect the
stock price and the future business and financial results of
EMJ. |
Although EMJs board of directors has recommended that
stockholders approve the proposal relating to the merger
agreement, if the recommendation of the board of directors is
adversely modified or withdrawn because the EMJ board of
directors exercises its fiduciary duties and the voting
agreement with the Kelso Funds is terminated there is no
assurance that this proposal will be adopted and approved by the
stockholders, and there is no assurance that Reliance and EMJ
will receive the necessary regulatory approvals or satisfy the
other conditions to the completion of the merger. If the merger
is not completed for any reason, EMJ will be subject to several
risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ may be required to pay and reimburse Reliance amounts of up
to approximately $20.5 million in the aggregate if the
merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
the current market price of EMJ common stock may reflect a
market assumption that the merger will occur, and a failure to
complete the merger could result in a negative perception by the
market of EMJ generally and a resulting decline in the market
price of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
many costs of EMJ relating to the merger (such as legal,
accounting, and a portion of its financial advisory fees) are
payable by EMJ whether or not the merger is completed; |
|
|
|
there may be substantial disruption to the business of EMJ and a
distraction of its management and employees from
day-to-day operations,
because matters related to the merger may require substantial
commitments of time and resources, which could otherwise have
been devoted to other opportunities that could have been
beneficial to EMJ; and |
|
|
|
EMJ would continue to face the risks that it currently faces as
an independent company, as further described in the documents
that EMJ has filed with the SEC that are incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
In addition, EMJ would not realize any of the expected benefits
of having completed the merger. If the merger is not completed,
the risks described above may materialize and materially
adversely affect EMJs business, financial results,
financial condition, prospects and stock price.
|
|
|
EMJ executive officers and directors have financial
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, the interests of EMJ stockholders. |
Executive officers of EMJ participated in the negotiation of the
terms of the merger agreement with their counterparts at
Reliance, and EMJs board of directors approved the merger
agreement and unanimously recommended that EMJ stockholders vote
to adopt and approve the merger. In considering these facts and
the other information contained in this proxy statement/
prospectus, you should be aware that some of EMJs
executive officers and directors have financial interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of EMJ stockholders. For example, Mr. Nelson and
Mr. Johnson have entered into agreements with EMJ that may
provide, among other things, change of control, retention and
severance and other benefits following the merger. In addition,
certain executive officers have Holding options that will be
cashed out at a substantial premium over their exercise price as
a result of the merger. Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig, who are members of EMJs board of
directors, are affiliated with the
31
Kelso Funds, which own approximately 50.1% of the outstanding
EMJ common stock. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement,
Reliance has agreed to register, and provide the Kelso Funds
with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with
respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the
Kelso Funds in the merger, to allow for the orderly sale of the
shares of Reliance common stock that they receive as a result of
the merger. These and some other interests of EMJ directors and
executive officers may create potential conflicts of interest
and cause some of these persons to view the merger differently
than you may view it, as a stockholder. Please see The
Merger Interests of EMJs Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger beginning on page 68
of this proxy statement/ prospectus for more information about
these financial interests.
|
|
|
The merger agreement limits EMJs ability to pursue
alternatives to the merger. |
The merger agreement contains provisions that generally limit
EMJs ability to pursue alternatives to the merger with
Reliance. These provisions provide that EMJ may not
(1) initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or
facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public
information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal,
(2) enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal or (3) furnish, or provide access to, any
information or data to, or have or participate in any
discussions or negotiations with, any person relating to a
takeover proposal; provided, however, that (a) EMJ may
respond to an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal
from a third party if EMJs board of directors determines
in good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal
counsel and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal
constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute a superior
proposal, and (b) EMJs board of directors may
withdraw or modify its recommendation of the merger if it
determines that a takeover proposal is a superior proposal or if
it determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, that failure to withdraw
or modify its recommendation of the merger may be reasonably
expected to violate its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
In addition, Reliance is entitled to receive a termination fee
of approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement due to EMJs board of directors
(1) withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation
of the merger, (2) recommending another takeover proposal
other than the merger or (3) determining to accept a
superior proposal.
Reliance required EMJ to agree to these provisions as a
condition to Reliances willingness to enter into the
merger agreement. These provisions, however, might discourage a
third party that might have an interest in acquiring all of or a
significant part of EMJ from considering or proposing that
acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay
consideration with a higher per share market price than the
current merger consideration. Furthermore, a potential competing
acquiror might propose to pay a lower per share price to EMJ
stockholders than it would otherwise have proposed to pay
because of EMJs obligation, in connection with termination
of the merger agreement, to pay Reliance the termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million.
|
|
|
The price of Reliance common stock may be affected by
factors different from those affecting the price of EMJ common
stock. |
Holders of EMJ common stock will receive Reliance common stock
in the merger and thus will become holders of Reliance common
stock. The businesses of Reliance and EMJ differ in important
respects and, accordingly, Reliances results of
operations, as well as the price of Reliance common stock, may
be affected by factors different from those currently affecting
the independent results of operations of EMJ and the price of
EMJ common stock. The price of Reliance common stock may
fluctuate significantly following the merger, including
fluctuation due to factors over which Reliance has no control.
For a discussion of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ, see
Reliances Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and EMJs Annual Report
on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2005, each of which is
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus,
and Information about Reliance and Information
about EMJ beginning on page 91 and page 92,
respectively, of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
32
|
|
|
The opinions obtained by EMJ from its financial advisors
will not reflect changes in circumstances between signing of the
merger agreement and the completion of the merger. |
EMJ has not obtained updated opinions as of the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus from its financial advisors. Changes
in the operations and prospects of Reliance or EMJ, general
market and economic conditions and other factors which may be
beyond the control of Reliance and EMJ, and on which the
financial advisors opinions were based, may significantly
alter the value of Reliance or EMJ or the prices of shares of
Reliance common stock or EMJ common stock by the time the merger
is completed. The opinions do not speak as of the time the
merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date
of such opinions. Because EMJ currently does not anticipate
asking its financial advisors to update their opinions, the
opinions will not address the fairness of the merger
consideration, from a financial point of view, at the time the
merger is completed. For a description of the opinions that EMJ
received from its financial advisors, please refer to The
Merger Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to EMJs Board of Directors beginning
on page 52 and The Merger Opinion of
Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 57. For a description of
the other factors considered by EMJs board of directors in
determining to approve the merger, please refer to The
Merger EMJs Reasons for the Merger
beginning on page 50 and The Merger
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors beginning
on page 52.
|
|
|
EMJs stockholders voting power will be
diluted, and they will not be able to control the outcome of a
proposal voted on by Reliance stockholders. |
EMJs stockholders presently have the power to approve or
reject any matter affecting EMJ requiring the approval of
stockholders under Delaware law and EMJs certificate of
incorporation. Immediately after the merger, EMJs
stockholders, in the aggregate, will hold approximately 11.9% of
the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock (based on an
assumed exchange ratio of 0.0892, which would be the exchange
ratio if the average closing price for the pricing period was
$79.89). Even if all of the former EMJ stockholders voted in
concert on all matters presented to Reliances
shareholders, this number of Reliance shares, without a
substantial number of other holders of Reliance common stock
voting the same way, will not affect the outcome of proposals
voted upon by the shareholders of Reliance.
Risks Relating to Reliance After the Merger
|
|
|
Existing shareholders may sell their shares which could
depress the market price of Reliances common stock. |
Immediately following the merger, Reliances officers,
directors and significant shareholders (including the Kelso
Funds) will own approximately 7.3 million shares or
approximately 19.4% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common
stock that would be eligible to be resold into the public market
(based on an assumed exchange ratio of 0.0892, which would be
the exchange ratio if the average closing price for the pricing
period was $79.89). If these shareholders sell a large number of
these shares or if there is a perception that they intend to
sell a large number of these shares, the market price of
Reliances common stock could decline, as these sales could
be viewed by the public as an indication of unfavorable
prospects for its operations.
|
|
|
Reliance may be unable to successfully integrate the
businesses of EMJ on a timely basis and realize the full
anticipated benefits of the merger. |
The merger involves the integration of two companies that have
previously operated independently. As with every merger, there
are potential difficulties of combining the companies
businesses. These may include the integration of EMJs
sales and marketing, distribution, processing, finance and
administrative operations, with and into Reliances
operations. The transition of certain processes following the
merger could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in,
the activities of one or more of the combined companys
businesses and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of
managements attention and any delays or difficulties
encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of
the two companies
33
operations of these businesses could have an adverse effect on
the business, results of operations, financial condition or
prospects of Reliance after the merger.
|
|
|
The value of your investment may be subject to sudden
decreases due to the potential volatility of the price of
Reliance common stock. |
The market price of Reliance common stock may be highly volatile
and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors,
including variations in Reliances quarterly results of
operations. Other factors may include matters discussed in other
risk factors and the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in expectations as to Reliances future financial
performance, including financial estimates by securities
analysts and investors; |
|
|
|
developments affecting Reliance, its customers or its suppliers; |
|
|
|
changes in the legal or regulatory environment affecting
Reliances business; |
|
|
|
press releases, earnings releases or publicity relating to
Reliance or its competitors or relating to trends in the metals
service industry; |
|
|
|
inability to meet securities analysts and investors
quarterly or annual estimates or targets of Reliance performance; |
|
|
|
the operating and stock performance of other companies that
investors may deem comparable; |
|
|
|
sales of Reliance common stock by the Kelso Funds; and |
|
|
|
general domestic or international economic, market and political
conditions. |
These factors may adversely affect the trading price of Reliance
common stock, regardless of Reliances actual operating
performance, and could prevent you from selling your Reliance
common stock at or above the value of the shares at the closing
of the merger. In addition, the stock markets from time to time
experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
companies. In the past, some shareholders have brought
securities class action lawsuits against companies following
periods of volatility in the market price of their securities.
Reliance may in the future be the target of similar litigation.
Securities litigation, regardless of whether Reliances
defense is ultimately successful, could result in substantial
costs and divert managements attention and resources.
|
|
|
Reliances substantial indebtedness could impair its
financial condition and reduce the funds available to Reliance
for other purposes and Reliances failure to comply with
the covenants contained in its debt instruments could result in
an event of default that could adversely affect its operating
results. |
Reliance has substantial debt service obligations and will incur
more debt as a result of this merger. As of September 30,
2005, assuming the merger had been completed as of such date,
Reliance would have had aggregate outstanding indebtedness of
approximately $1.1 billion. Reliances substantial
indebtedness could adversely affect Reliance in the following
ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Reliances ability to obtain additional financing in the
future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
general corporate purposes or other purposes may be impaired; |
|
|
|
a significant portion of Reliances cash flow from
operations must be dedicated to the payment of interest and
principal on its debt, which reduces the funds available to
Reliance for its operations or other purposes; |
|
|
|
some of Reliances debt is, and will continue to be, at
variable rates of interest, which may result in higher interest
expense in the event of increases in interest rates; |
|
|
|
because Reliance may be more leveraged than some of its
competitors, its debt may place Reliance at a competitive
disadvantage; |
34
|
|
|
|
|
Reliances leverage will increase its vulnerability to
economic downturns and limit Reliances ability to
withstand adverse events in its business by limiting
Reliances financial alternatives; |
|
|
|
EMJs noteholders could require repurchase of EMJs
93/4% notes,
as provided in the EMJ
93/4% notes
indenture, which would substantially increase Reliances
leverage and limit its access to funds for growth
initiatives; and |
|
|
|
Reliances ability to capitalize on significant business
opportunities and to plan for, or respond to, competition and
changes in its business may be limited. |
Reliances debt agreements contain, and any agreements to
refinance its debt likely will contain, financial and
restrictive covenants that limit Reliances ability to
incur additional debt, including to finance future operations or
other capital needs, and to engage in other activities that
Reliance may believe are in its long-term best interests,
including to dispose of or acquire assets or other companies or
to pay dividends to its shareholders. Reliances failure to
comply with these covenants may result in an event of default
which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the maturity of
Reliances indebtedness or prevent Reliance from accessing
availability under its credit facility. If Reliances
indebtedness is accelerated, it may not have sufficient cash
resources to satisfy its debt obligations and Reliance may not
be able to continue its operations as planned.
|
|
|
Reliance may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow
to meet its debt service obligations. |
Reliances annual debt service obligations until
June 11, 2010, when its revolving credit facility is
expected to mature, will be primarily limited to interest and
principal payments on Reliances senior notes (with the
principal payable only as and when they mature), on its credit
facility, and on its industrial revenue bonds. Reliances
ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make
scheduled payments on its debt obligations will depend on
Reliances future financial performance, which will be
affected by a range of economic, competitive and business
factors, many of which are outside of Reliances control.
For example, Reliance may not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to repay its credit facility when it matures in 2010,
or its senior notes when they mature on various dates between
2006 and 2013 or its industrial revenue bonds when they mature
in 2009 and 2014. If Reliance does not generate sufficient cash
flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, Reliance
expects to undertake alternative financing plans, such as
refinancing or restructuring its debt, selling assets, reducing
or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional
capital. Reliance may not be able to consummate any such
transaction at all or on a timely basis or on terms, and for
proceeds, that are acceptable to it. Furthermore, these
transactions may not be permitted under the terms of
Reliances various debt instruments then in effect.
Reliances inability to generate sufficient cash flow to
satisfy its debt obligations, or to timely refinance its
obligations on acceptable terms, could adversely affect
Reliances ability to serve its customers and could cause
Reliance to discontinue its operations as planned.
Reliances credit facility is unsecured.
In the merger, the newly-formed subsidiary of Reliance will
assume all of the outstanding debt of EMJ, which, as of
December 30, 2005, was approximately $286 million. In
addition, as a result of the merger, the holders of EMJs
93/4% notes
have the option to require the redemption of the notes at 101%
of their face amount. The additional debt of EMJ and possible
redemption of EMJs
93/4% notes
might further impact Reliances ability to satisfy its debt
obligations following the merger.
|
|
|
Ongoing tax audits of Reliance may result in additional
taxes. |
Reliance and EMJ are undergoing various tax audits. These tax
audits could result in additional taxes, plus interest and
penalties being assessed against either or both companies.
35
|
|
|
The costs that Reliance pays for metals may fluctuate due
to a number of factors beyond their control, which, on a
combined basis, could adversely affect Reliances operating
results if they cannot pass on higher metal prices to their
customers. |
Reliance purchases large quantities of carbon, alloy, stainless
steel, aluminum and other metals, which it sells to a variety of
end-users. In 2004 the costs for carbon steel increased
significantly and rapidly from historic levels. Although these
costs declined somewhat in mid-2005, the costs increased in the
fourth quarter of 2005 and overall carbon steel costs remained
at historically high levels. Costs for aluminum and stainless
steel products, excluding aerospace-related products, rose
steadily in 2004 and there were some continued increases in
2005. Costs for aerospace-related products have increased
significantly beginning in late 2004 and continued to increase
through all of 2005. Reliance attempts to pass these cost
increases on to its customers with higher selling prices. The
costs to Reliance for these metals and the prices that it
charges customers for its products may change depending on many
factors outside of its control, including general economic
conditions (both domestic and international), competition,
production levels, customer demand levels, import duties and
other trade restrictions, currency fluctuations and surcharges
imposed by Reliances suppliers.
Reliance maintains substantial inventories of metal to
accommodate the short lead times and delivery requirements of
its customers. Accordingly, Reliance purchases metal in
quantities it believes to be appropriate to satisfy the
anticipated needs of its customers based on information derived
from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry
research. Commitments for metal purchases are generally at
prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed
or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising prices for
metal, Reliance may be negatively impacted by delays between the
time of increases in the cost of metals to Reliance and
increases in the prices that Reliance charges for its products
if it is unable to pass these increased costs on to its
customers. In addition, when metal prices decline, customer
demands for lower prices could result in lower sale prices for
Reliances products and, as Reliance uses existing
inventory that it purchased at higher metal prices, lower
margins. Consequently, during periods in which Reliance uses
this existing inventory, the effects of changing metal prices
could adversely affect Reliances operating results.
|
|
|
The price of metals is subject to fluctuations in the
supply and demand for metals worldwide and changes in the
worldwide balance of supply and demand could negatively impact
Reliances revenues, gross profit and net income. |
Metal prices are volatile due to, among other things,
fluctuations in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw
material availability, metals consumption and foreign currency
rates. For example, in the past few years, China has
significantly increased its consumption of metals and metal
products. This large and growing demand for metals has
significantly affected the metals industry, diverting supply to
China and contributing to the recent increase in metal prices.
If, in the future, China experiences a downturn in general
economic conditions or increases its internal production of
metals, its demand for metals produced outside of China could
decrease. Such a decrease could cause a reduction in metal
prices globally, which could adversely affect Reliances
revenues, gross profit and net income. Additionally, significant
currency fluctuations in the United States or abroad could
negatively impact Reliances cost of metals and the pricing
of its products. Recently, the decline in the dollar relative to
foreign currencies resulted in increased prices for metals and
metal products in the United States as imported metals became
relatively more expensive. If, in the future, the dollar
increases in value relative to foreign currencies, the domestic
market may be more attractive to foreign producers, resulting in
increased supply that could cause decreased metal prices and
adversely affect Reliances revenues, gross profit and net
income.
|
|
|
Reliance operates in an industry that is subject to
cyclical fluctuations and any downturn in general economic
conditions or its customers industries could negatively
impact its revenues, gross profit and net income. |
The metals service center industry is cyclical, impacted by both
market demand and metals supply. Periods of economic slowdown or
recession in the United States or other countries, or the public
36
perception that these may occur, could decrease the demand for
Reliances products and adversely affect its pricing. For
example, the general slowing of the economy in 2001, 2002 and
2003 adversely impacted Reliances product sales and
pricing. While Reliance experienced significantly improved
pricing and healthy demand levels in 2004 and 2005, this trend
may not continue. Changing economic conditions could depress or
delay demand for Reliances products, which could adversely
affect Reliances revenues, gross profit and net income.
Reliance sells many products to industries that are cyclical,
such as the industrial equipment, oil, gas and energy,
construction, semiconductor, agricultural equipment and
transportation industries, including aerospace. The demand for
Reliances products is directly related to, and quickly
impacted by, demand for the finished goods manufactured by
Reliances customers in these industries, which may change
as a result of the general United States or worldwide economy,
domestic exchange rates, energy prices or other factors beyond
Reliances control. If Reliance is unable to accurately
project the product needs of its customers over varying lead
times or if there is a limited availability of products through
allocation by the mills or otherwise, Reliance may not have
sufficient inventory to be able to provide products desired by
its customers on a timely basis. In addition, if Reliance is not
able to increase sales of products to customers in other
industries when one or more of the cyclical industries that it
serves is experiencing a decline, Reliances revenues,
gross profit and net income may be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Reliance competes with a large number of companies in the
metals service center industry, and, if Reliance is unable to
compete effectively, Reliances revenues, gross profit and
net income may decline. |
Reliance competes with a large number of other general-line
distributors and specialty distributors in the metals service
center industry. Competition is based principally on price,
inventory availability, timely delivery, customer service,
quality and processing capabilities. Competition in the various
markets in which Reliance participates comes from companies of
various sizes, some of which have greater financial resources
than Reliance does and some of which have more established brand
names in the local markets Reliance serves. Accordingly, these
competitors may be better able to withstand changes in
conditions within Reliances customers industries and
may have greater operating and financial flexibility than
Reliance has. To compete for customer sales, Reliance may lower
prices or offer increased services at a higher cost, which could
reduce Reliances revenues, gross profit and net income.
|
|
|
If Reliance was to lose any of its primary suppliers or
otherwise be unable to obtain sufficient amounts of necessary
metals on a timely basis, Reliance may not be able to meet its
customers needs and may suffer reduced sales. |
Reliance has few long-term contracts to purchase metals.
Therefore, its primary suppliers of carbon steel, alloy steel,
stainless steel, aluminum or other metals could curtail or
discontinue their delivery of these metals to Reliance in the
quantities it needs. Reliances ability to meet its
customers needs and provide value-added inventory
management services depends on Reliances ability to
maintain an uninterrupted supply of metal products from its
suppliers. If Reliances suppliers experience production
problems, lack of capacity or transportation disruptions, the
lead times for receiving Reliances supply of metal
products could be extended and the cost of Reliances
inventory may increase. If, in the future, Reliance is unable to
obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive
prices and on a timely basis from its traditional suppliers,
Reliance may not be able to obtain these metals from acceptable
alternative sources at competitive prices to meet
Reliances delivery schedules. Even if Reliance does find
acceptable alternative suppliers, the process of locating and
securing these alternatives may be disruptive to its business,
which could have an adverse impact on Reliances ability to
meet its customers needs and reduce its sales, gross
profit and net income. In addition, if a significant domestic
supply source is discontinued and Reliance cannot find
acceptable domestic alternatives, Reliance may need to find a
foreign source of supply. Dependence on foreign sources of
supply could lead to longer lead times, increased price
volatility, less favorable payment terms and certain tariffs and
duties.
37
|
|
|
Reliances acquisition of EMJ is its largest and
first public company acquisition and there may be additional
risks of which Reliance is not aware or existing risks may
change over time. |
The EMJ acquisition is Reliances largest acquisition and
its first acquisition of a public company. There may be
additional risks associated with this acquisition that Reliance
is not aware of at the present time because Reliance has not
previously integrated a business of this size. After the
acquisition, customers may choose to diversify their metals
suppliers to reduce their dependence on a single supplier for
the majority of their metals needs. Reliance may not be able to
retain all of the Reliance and EMJ customers, and any loss of
customers and the business that they bring to us could have an
adverse effect on our operating results.
Reliance has agreed to assume liability for EMJs various
retirement and pension plans. The actual costs for the benefits
to be provided to EMJs employees may exceed those
projected, and future actuarial assessments of the extent of
those costs may exceed the current assessment. Any adjustments
that are required to be made to the recorded liability for these
benefits could have an adverse effect on operating results and
financial condition. In addition, Reliance may be required to
make cash payments in excess or in addition to those that have
been projected, which could have an adverse effect on cash flow.
Reliance expects that it will record a significant amount of
goodwill related to the acquisition of EMJ. If EMJ does not
perform as anticipated, this could result in an impairment
charge that could be material.
|
|
|
If Reliance does not successfully implement its
acquisition growth strategy, its ability to grow its business
could be impaired. |
Reliance may not be able to identify suitable acquisition
candidates or successfully complete any acquisitions or
integrate any other businesses into its operations. If Reliance
cannot identify suitable acquisition candidates, Reliance is
unlikely to sustain its historical growth rates, and, if
Reliance cannot successfully integrate these businesses, it may
incur increased or redundant expenses. Moreover, any additional
indebtedness Reliance incurs to pay for these acquisitions could
adversely affect its liquidity and financial strength.
|
|
|
As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both
senior management and Reliances key operating employees;
if Reliance is unable to attract and retain these individuals,
its ability to operate and grow its business may be adversely
affected. |
Because of Reliances decentralized operating style,
Reliance depends on the efforts of its senior management,
including its chief executive officer, David H. Hannah, its
president and chief operating officer, Gregg J. Mollins, and its
executive vice president and chief financial officer, Karla
Lewis, as well as other key operating employees. Reliance may
not be able to retain these individuals or attract and retain
additional qualified personnel when needed. EMJ has entered into
a retention agreement with EMJs vice president, chief
financial officer and secretary William S. Johnson, which
provides for employment and severance benefits and has a term of
three years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms. If
Mr. Johnson continues to serve as EMJs vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary and his
employment is terminated under certain circumstances,
Mr. Johnson will be entitled to certain bonus amounts. See
The Merger Interests of EMJs Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger Johnson
Retention Agreement on page 68 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus for additional information regarding
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement. Other than the
obligations RSAC will assume under Mr. Johnsons
retention agreement, Reliance does not have employment
agreements with any of its officers or employees, which may mean
they may have less of an incentive to stay with Reliance when
presented with alternative employment opportunities. In
addition, Reliances senior management and key operating
employees hold stock options that have vested and hold common
stock in Reliances employee stock ownership plan. These
individuals may, therefore, be more likely to leave Reliance if
the shares of its common stock significantly appreciate in
value. The loss of any key officer or employee will require
remaining officers and employees to direct immediate and
substantial attention to seeking a replacement. Reliances
inability to retain members of its senior management or key
operating employees or to find adequate replacements for any
departing key officer or employee on a timely basis could
adversely affect Reliances ability to operate and grow its
business.
38
|
|
|
Reliance is subject to various environmental and employee
safety and health regulations, which could subject Reliance to
significant liabilities and compliance expenditures. |
Reliance is subject to certain federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions,
wastewater discharges, underground storage tanks and solid and
hazardous waste disposal at or from its facilities.
Reliances operations are also subject to various employee
safety and health laws and regulations, including those
concerning occupational injury and illness, employee exposure to
hazardous materials and employee complaints. Environmental and
employee safety and health regulations are comprehensive,
complex and frequently changing. Some of these laws and
regulations are subject to varying and conflicting
interpretations. Reliance may be subject from time to time to
administrative and/or judicial proceedings or investigations
brought by private parties or governmental agencies with respect
to environmental matters and employee safety and health issues.
Currently, Reliance has no material outstanding unresolved
issues with environmental regulators. Proceedings and
investigations with respect to environmental matters and any
employee safety and health issues could result in substantial
costs to Reliance, divert its managements attention and
result in significant liabilities, fines or the suspension or
interruption of Reliances service center activities. Some
of Reliances current properties are located in industrial
areas with histories of heavy industrial use. The location of
these properties may require Reliance to incur expenditures and
to establish environmental liabilities for costs that arise from
causes other than Reliances operations. Future events,
such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their
enforcement, new laws and regulations or the discovery of
conditions not currently known to Reliance, could create
material compliance or remedial liabilities and costs which may
constrain Reliances operations or make such operations
more costly.
|
|
|
Reliances operating results have fluctuated, and are
expected to continue fluctuating, depending on the season, and
such fluctuations may adversely affect Reliances stock
price. |
Many of Reliances customers are in seasonal businesses,
including customers in the construction and related industries.
In addition, Reliances revenues in the months of July,
November and December traditionally have been lower than in
other months because of increased vacation days and holiday
closures for various customers. Consequently, you should not
rely on Reliances results of operations during any
particular quarter as an indication of Reliances results
for a full year or any other quarter. In addition, if analysts
and investors inaccurately estimate Reliances results of
operations in one or more future quarters and Reliances
operating results fall below expectations, Reliances stock
price may decline.
|
|
|
Reliances business could be adversely affected by
economic downturns. |
Demand for Reliances products is affected by a number of
general economic factors. A decline in economic activity in the
United States and other markets in which Reliance operates could
materially affect Reliances financial condition and
results of operation.
|
|
|
Damage to Reliances computer infrastructure and
software systems could harm Reliances business. |
The unavailability of any of Reliances information
management systems for any significant period of time could have
an adverse effect on Reliances operations. In particular,
Reliances ability to deliver products to its customers
when needed, collect its receivables and manage inventory levels
successfully largely depends on the efficient operation of
Reliances computer hardware and software systems. Through
Reliances information management systems, Reliance
provides inventory availability to its sales and operating
personnel, improves customer service through better order and
product reference data and monitors operating results.
Difficulties associated with upgrades, installations of major
software or hardware, and integration with new systems could
lead to business interruptions that could harm Reliances
reputation, increase its operating costs and decrease its
profitability. In addition, these systems are vulnerable to,
among other things, damage or interruption from power loss,
computer system and network failures, loss of telecommunications
services, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of
data, or security breaches and computer viruses.
39
Reliance has contracted with a third-party service provider that
provides Reliance with backup systems in the event that its
information management systems are damaged. It is possible that
the backup facilities and other protective measures Reliance
takes could prove to be inadequate.
|
|
|
Principal shareholders who own a significant number of
shares may have interests that conflict with yours. |
After giving effect to the merger, assuming an average closing
price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period of $79.89
(which would be the average closing price for the pricing period
if the pricing period ended on February 22, 2006), Florence
Neilan, Reliances largest shareholder, will own 11.2% of
the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock and the Kelso
Funds will own 6.0% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common
stock. As a result, these shareholders may have the ability to
significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval.
In deciding how to vote on such matters, these shareholders may
be influenced by interests that conflict with yours.
|
|
|
Reliance has implemented anti-takeover provisions that may
adversely impact your rights as a holder of Reliance common
stock. |
Reliances articles of incorporation and its bylaws could
delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring Reliance,
despite the possible benefit to its shareholders, or otherwise
adversely affect the price of Reliance common stock and the
rights of Reliances stockholders. Reliance is authorized
to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value,
with the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of
such stock to be determined by Reliances board of
directors, without a vote of the holders of common stock. The
Reliance board of directors could grant rights to holders of
preferred stock to reduce the attractiveness of Reliance as a
potential takeover target, or make the removal of management
more difficult. In addition, Reliances articles of
incorporation and bylaws (1) impose advance notice
requirements for shareholder proposals and nominations of
directors to be considered at shareholder meetings and
(2) establish a staggered or classified board of directors.
These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts,
discourage bids for Reliances common stock at a premium
over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and
the voting and other rights of the holders of, Reliances
common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy
contests and make it more difficult for you and other
shareholders to elect directors other than the candidates
nominated by Reliances board of directors. In addition,
Reliances credit facility and the provisions of
Reliances senior notes contain limitations on
Reliances ability to enter into change of control
transactions. See Comparison of Stockholders
Rights beginning on page 101 of this proxy statement/
prospectus for additional information on the anti-takeover
measures applicable to Reliance.
40
THE EMJ SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement/ prospectus is furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies from the holders of EMJ common stock
by EMJs board of directors for use at the special meeting
of EMJ stockholders. The purpose of the special meeting is for
you to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve
the merger agreement and the merger. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Annex A and made part of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
This proxy statement/ prospectus is first being furnished to EMJ
stockholders on or about March 3, 2006.
Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting
The special meeting will be held on March 31, 2006, at
9:00 a.m. (local time) at EMJs headquarters located
at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
The purpose of the special meeting will be to:
|
|
|
1. allow the EMJ stockholders to consider and vote on a
proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, Reliance
and RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and into RSAC,
with RSAC as the surviving corporation, and Reliance will pay
cash and issue shares of its common stock in exchange for the
outstanding common stock of EMJ; and |
|
|
2. to transact any other business that may properly come
before the meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting, including to consider and
vote upon any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the
special meeting, such as adjournment of the special meeting. |
Board Recommendation
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are advisable and in the best interests
of EMJ and its stockholders and unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the merger. EMJs board of directors
unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote
FOR adoption and approval of the merger
agreement at the special meeting.
Who May Vote
EMJ stockholders, as recorded in EMJs stock register at
the close of business on March 2, 2006, will be entitled to
receive notice of and vote at the special meeting. As of
February 24, 2006, the latest practicable date before the
date of this proxy statement/prospectus there were 50
stockholders of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on the
records of EMJs transfer agent for such shares.
Outstanding Shares and Quorum
EMJ shares outstanding on March 2, 2006, the record date
for voting at the special meeting, consisted of
50,237,094 shares of common stock with one vote per share.
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ
common stock on the record date, represented in person or by
proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the special
meeting. A quorum is necessary to hold the special meeting.
Under the voting agreement, the Kelso Funds have agreed to be
present at the meeting, so, unless the voting agreement is
terminated, a quorum is assured. Any shares of EMJ common stock
held in treasury by EMJ or by any of its subsidiaries are not
considered to be outstanding for purposes of determining a
quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, which will
occur when a registered broker, who holds stock in street name,
does not receive voting instructions from a beneficial owner,
will be treated as present for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum. Once a share is represented at
41
the special meeting, it will be counted for the purpose of
determining a quorum at the special meeting and any adjournment
or postponement of the special meeting, unless the holder is
present solely to object at the beginning of the special meeting
to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not
lawfully called or convened. However, if a new record date is
set for the adjourned or postponed special meeting, then a new
quorum will have to be established.
How Proxies Work
EMJs board of directors is asking you to appoint Maurice
S. Nelson, Jr. and William S. Johnson as your proxy holders
to vote your shares at the special meeting to be held on
March 31, 2006. You make this appointment by voting the
enclosed proxy card using one of the voting methods described
below. Giving EMJ your proxy means you authorize the proxy
holders to vote your shares at the special meeting, according to
the directions you provide. You may vote for or against the
merger agreement and the merger or abstain from voting.
EMJ does not expect any matter to be brought before the special
meeting other than the merger proposal. If other matters are
properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named as
proxies will vote in their discretion with respect to such
matters. However, if a proposal regarding adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting is properly presented to
permit EMJs board of directors to further solicit proxies,
the persons named in the proxies will not have discretion to
vote shares voted against the merger agreement in favor of such
adjournment or postponement.
Returning a Signed Proxy without Voting Instructions
If you do return a signed proxy card without providing voting
instructions, your shares will be voted in favor of the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and in the discretion of
the proxies on any other matters that may come before the
special meeting.
How EMJ Solicits Proxies
In addition to this mailing, EMJs directors, officers and
employees (who will receive no compensation in addition to their
regular salaries) may solicit proxies personally,
electronically, by telephone or with additional mailings. EMJ
pays the costs of soliciting this proxy. EMJ reimburses brokers,
banks and similar organizations, including the trustee of the
retirement savings plan, for their reasonable charges and
expenses in sending these materials to you and getting your
voting instructions.
How to Vote Your Shares
Voting EMJ shares you own directly. If your shares are
held in your name, you can vote your shares in person at the
special meeting or you can vote by proxy as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
By telephone: Use the toll-free number listed on the proxy card.
Easy-to-follow voice
prompts allow you to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
By Internet: The Website for Internet voting is listed on the
proxy card. |
|
|
|
By mail: Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the
enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. |
The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control
number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a
stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your
voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by
telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card.
All proxy votes, whether cast by telephone, Internet or mail,
must be received by American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 30, 2006.
If you receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting
instruction card it may mean that your EMJ shares are registered
in different ways (for example you own EMJ common stock directly
and through the retirement savings plan) or your shares are in
more than one account. Please provide voting instructions
42
for all proxy cards and proxy voting instruction cards you
receive to ensure that all of your EMJ shares are voted at the
special meeting.
Voting EMJ shares you hold through a nominee. If you hold
shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, bank or
other nominee, you will receive material from that firm asking
how you want to vote. You can complete the firms voting
form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers telephone or
Internet voting, the voting form will contain instructions on
how to access those voting methods.
If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the
special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an
account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you
beneficially owned the shares on March 2, 2006, the record
date for voting.
Voting Shares in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings
Plan
If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as
you direct. You may direct the trustee how to vote the number of
shares of EMJ common stock that are credited to your account as
of March 2, 2006, the record date. You can direct the
trustee by completing and returning your proxy voting
instruction card or by telephone or through the Internet, in
accordance with the instructions provided with respect to the
retirement savings plan. All proxy voting instructions for your
retirement savings plan account, whether by mail, telephone or
Internet, must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on March 29, 2006 in order to be processed in a
timely manner. Your voting instructions will be kept
confidential. If the trustee does not receive timely voting
instructions from you, the trustee will vote all shares in the
retirement savings plan for which it did not receive voting
directions in the same proportion as the votes of the retirement
savings plan shares for which it received timely voting
directions from other participants in the retirement savings
plan.
Revoking a Proxy
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote in
one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at the
special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
submit to the secretary of EMJ a revocation letter with a later
date than your proxy card; |
|
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on
March 30, 2006, a second completed and signed proxy card
dated later than the first signed proxy card; |
|
|
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, on March 30, 2006, by telephone or the
Internet; or |
|
|
|
|
attend the special meeting and vote in person. |
If you hold your shares through a nominee, you may later revoke
your proxy instructions by informing the broker in accordance
with the brokers procedures.
If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you
must
|
|
|
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
March 29, 2006, a second completed and signed proxy voting
instruction card dated later than the first signed proxy
voting instruction card; or |
|
|
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on March 29, 2006, by telephone or the Internet. |
|
To submit a written notice of revocation or other communications
about revoking your proxy, or to request a new proxy card, you
should write to:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Attention: Secretary
43
If you are a street name stockholder, and you vote by proxy, you
may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing the holder
of record in accordance with that holders procedures.
Confidential Voting
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, EMJs
transfer agent, will count the votes. Its officers or employees
will serve as inspectors of election. Your individual vote,
proxies, consents, ballots and voting materials are
confidential, except in special circumstances (such as a
contested proxy or consent solicitation or as otherwise required
by law). For example, if you write comments on your proxy card
or accompanying material, your comments will be provided to EMJ
without indicating how you voted, unless you include your vote
in your comment or if how you voted is necessary to understand
your comment.
Effects of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of
shares, brokers may not vote shares of EMJ common stock with
respect to the adoption of the merger agreement, any other
matters that may properly come before the special meeting, or
any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. For
purposes of determining adoption and approval of the merger
agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same
effect as a vote against the merger agreement.
Vote Required
Each outstanding share of EMJ common stock on the record date
entitles the holder to one vote at the special meeting. Under
the provisions of EMJs certificate of incorporation and
the Delaware General Corporation Law, approval of the merger
agreement and the merger requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares of EMJs
common stock outstanding on the record date.
Because the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock is needed to adopt
and approve the merger agreement, the failure to submit your
proxy or vote in person will have the same effect as a vote
against the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes also will have the
same effect as a vote against the adoption and
approval of the merger agreement. Accordingly, EMJs board
of directors urges stockholders to complete, date, sign and
return the accompanying proxy card, or to submit a proxy by
telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions
included with your proxy card, or, in the event you hold your
shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee, by following
the separate voting instructions received from your broker,
bank, or nominee.
As a condition to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance
required the Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately
50.1% of the EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a
voting agreement to vote all of their shares in favor of
adoption and approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated prior to
the special meeting in accordance with its terms, the merger
will be approved at the special meeting regardless of the votes
of any other stockholders.
Adjournments and Postponements
Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may
be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made without notice,
other than by an announcement made at the special meeting. The
person presiding at the special meeting or a majority of the
shares of EMJ common stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the special meeting may adjourn the special meeting,
whether or not a quorum is present. Any signed proxies received
by EMJ will be voted in favor of an adjournment in these
circumstances, although a proxy vote against
adoption and approval of the merger agreement will not be voted
in favor of an adjournment for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. Any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies
will allow the EMJ stockholders who have already sent in their
proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the
special meeting as adjourned or postponed, provided that, such
44
revocation is in compliance with the instructions (including as
to the timing) set forth in the section entitled The EMJ
Special Meeting Revoking a Proxy beginning on
page 43 of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the
enclosed proxy card, and provided further, that if you
participate in the retirement savings plan, any revocation or
other instruction must be given to the trustee at least three
days prior to the date of the special meeting as adjourned or
postponed.
Householding
Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be
participating in the practice of householding proxy
statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of
this proxy statement/ prospectus may have been sent to multiple
stockholders in your household. EMJ will promptly deliver a
separate copy of this proxy statement/ prospectus to you if you
write or call Earle M. Jorgensen Company, 10650 Alameda
Street, Lynwood, California, Attention: William S. Johnson,
Secretary, Telephone: (323) 567-1122.
Stockholders should NOT send stock certificates with their
proxy cards.
If the merger is completed, stockholders will be mailed a
transmittal form promptly by the exchange/paying agent following
the completion of the merger with instructions on how to
exchange their EMJ common stock certificates.
45
THE MERGER
This section of the proxy statement/ prospectus describes
material aspects of the merger. While Reliance and EMJ believe
that the description covers the material terms of the merger and
the related transactions, this summary may not contain all of
the information that is important to you. You should carefully
read this entire proxy statement/ prospectus, the attached
Annexes, and the other documents which this proxy statement/
prospectus incorporates by reference, for a more complete
understanding of the merger. The merger agreement, not this
summary, is the legal document which governs the merger.
General
EMJs board of directors is using this proxy statement/
prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common
stock for use at the EMJ special meeting, where holders of EMJ
common stock will be asked to vote upon adoption and approval of
the merger agreement. In addition, Reliance is sending this
document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in connection with
the issuance of shares of Reliance common stock in exchange for
EMJ common stock in the merger.
Background of the Merger
During the week of September 12, 2005, UBS, financial
advisor to Reliance, contacted Mr. Wahrhaftig, to express
preliminary interest in an acquisition of EMJ by Reliance.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is one of EMJs directors and a
managing director of Kelso & Company, whose affiliates
own a majority of EMJs outstanding common stock.
Mr. Wahrhaftig suggested that UBS have Mr. Hannah
contact Kelso. Mr. Hannah is the chief executive officer of
Reliance. On September 19, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig and
Mr. Nickell, a director of EMJ and chief executive officer
of Kelso, spoke to Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins,
president and chief operating officer of Reliance.
Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliances interest in the
acquisition of EMJ for consideration consisting of both cash and
Reliance common stock in an amount in excess of $12.00 per
share. On September 20, 2005, the closing price of
EMJs common stock was $10.01 and the closing price of
Reliance common stock was $48.98. Mr. Hannah suggested that
the next steps would be to enter into a confidentiality
agreement and have Reliance conduct preliminary due diligence
prior to making a more specific proposal. Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig indicated that they would contact the other
members of EMJs board of directors to determine the
boards interest in entering into a confidentiality
agreement and allowing preliminary due diligence.
Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig promptly notified each
of the other members of EMJs board of directors of
Reliances interest. Each of EMJs directors indicated
his willingness to enter into a confidentiality agreement and
provide preliminary due diligence information. On
September 20, 2005, Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig called Mr. Hannah to advise him that
EMJs board of directors was interested in proceeding
further to investigate the possibility of a transaction.
Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of
EMJs board of directors, then directed EMJs outside
legal counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, to prepare a
confidentiality agreement. Reliance and EMJ entered into a
mutual confidentiality agreement on October 5, 2005.
On October 6, 2005, Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of EMJs board of directors,
met with Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins to discuss in
general terms the background of the two companies and
Reliances philosophy with respect to the operation of
companies following acquisition. In addition, they discussed the
metals service center industry and mutual perceptions of the two
companies. They also discussed the next steps in the process of
determining the potential for a transaction. The parties agreed
that Reliance would provide a preliminary due diligence request
list to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005,
Reliance sent a preliminary due diligence request list to Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005, after discussing
potential financial advisors with members of EMJs board of
directors and obtaining their recommendation, Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP contacted Credit Suisse to explore their interest
in providing financial advisory services to EMJs board of
directors with respect to a possible transaction. Credit Suisse
was contacted because of its expertise in providing financial
advisory services in merger and acquisition transactions and its
long-standing relationship with EMJ, commencing
46
in 1993 and continuing through its role as joint-bookrunning
underwriter of the EMJ initial public offering in April 2005.
On October 11, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Mr. Nickell reviewed the discussions with
UBS and Mr. Hannah in which Reliance had expressed an
interest in acquiring EMJ. Mr. Nelson, EMJs chief
executive officer, also reported that he had a telephone
conversation with Mr. Hannah on October 5, 2005, in
which Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliances interest in
acquiring EMJ. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP informed the members
of EMJs board of directors that EMJ had entered into a
mutual confidentiality agreement with Reliance and was preparing
a response to a preliminary due diligence request list received
from UBS. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP also noted that they were
reviewing the public filings of Reliance with a view to
preparing a similar request for information from Reliance.
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP provided EMJs board of
directors with an overview of its fiduciary duties, and the
procedures for reviewing, evaluating and negotiating a possible
transaction and discussed with them the standards of conduct and
the alternatives that should be considered in connection with a
possible sale of EMJ. Such discussion included a discussion of
EMJs strategic alternatives, including continuing as an
independent company, conducting a formal or informal auction
process and negotiating exclusively with Reliance.
After such discussion, Credit Suisse joined the meeting by
conference call to make a presentation to EMJs board of
directors with respect to its possible engagement as EMJs
financial advisor in connection with a transaction. Credit
Suisse discussed its qualifications and the team of
professionals that it would use on a transaction, reviewed the
publicly-available information with respect to EMJ and Reliance,
provided an overview of the financial analyses that would be
used to assess the terms of any transaction and discussed the
processes for EMJ to consider a proposal from Reliance and
compare such a proposal to EMJs strategic alternatives.
Following the presentation, Credit Suisse left the call, and
EMJs board of directors discussed Credit Suisses
qualifications and the advantages and disadvantages of
interviewing other candidates. After such discussion, EMJs
board of directors authorized the engagement of Credit Suisse as
EMJs financial advisor, decided to pursue discussions with
Reliance to develop a proposal and authorized Mr. Mason,
Mr. Nelson, Mr. Nickell, and Mr. Wahrhaftig to be
the primary contacts with Credit Suisse.
On October 12, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig called
Mr. Hannah to confirm that Credit Suisse had been engaged
by EMJ and to discuss the timing of a management meeting. On
October 14, 2005, EMJ provided Reliance with materials in
response to the preliminary due diligence request list. On
October 17, 2005, Credit Suisse submitted to Reliance a
preliminary due diligence request list with respect to Reliance.
On October 19, 2005, Mr. Nelson, Mr. McCaffery
and Mr. Johnson, the senior executive officers of EMJ, met
with Mr. Hannah, Mr. Mollins and Ms. Lewis, their
counterparts at Reliance. Representatives from Credit Suisse and
UBS also attended the meeting. The representatives of EMJ
discussed their operations and answered questions from
representatives of Reliance. Representatives of Reliance also
discussed generally their expectations of how EMJ might be
combined with Reliance.
On October 28, 2005, EMJ received from Reliance a letter
and summary of terms proposing the acquisition of all of the EMJ
common stock at a purchase price of $12.00 per share with
consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common
stock. Reliance also asked for certain transaction protections
including a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a
voting agreement requiring the Kelso Funds to vote in favor of
the transaction, whether or not EMJs board of directors
had withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of the
transaction, and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso
Funds at the transaction price. Mr. Hannah also called
Mr. Nelson to confirm that he had received the proposal and
to highlight some of the terms. The letter and summary of terms
were promptly provided to the members of EMJs board of
directors.
On October 31, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Mr. Nelson reported on the due diligence
meeting held with the management of Reliance. Representatives of
Credit Suisse reviewed with EMJs board of directors the
letter and summary of terms. After some discussion it was agreed
that
47
discussion would be continued at a meeting to follow EMJs
regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting on November 2,
2005.
On November 2, 2005, following EMJs regular board
meeting, EMJs board of directors met with its advisors to
review the letter and summary of terms received from Reliance
and to consider EMJs response. EMJs board of
directors discussed, among other issues, the proposed purchase
price, the premium it represented over EMJs closing price
on November 1, 2005, and EMJs stock performance since
the initial approach by Reliance. In addition, the members of
the board of directors discussed the proposed levels of the cash
and stock consideration, the trading price of the Reliance
common stock relative to historic levels and customary
transaction protection provisions. On November 1, 2005, the
closing price of EMJ common stock was $8.24 and the closing
price of Reliances common stock was $57.89. Credit Suisse
reviewed the provisions of the summary of terms and a
preliminary financial analysis of both companies based on
publicly available information. EMJs board of directors
also discussed with its advisors the ability of Reliance to
finance the proposed transaction, and the prospect for
increasing the percentage of consideration to be paid in cash. A
variety of alternative proposals and negotiation strategies were
discussed. On November 4, 2005, Mr. Hannah spoke with
Mr. Wahrhaftig regarding the proposal and the timing of
EMJs response. At that time, Mr. Wahrhaftig asked
whether Reliance would be willing to increase the cash portion
of the consideration, but Reliance was not willing to make a
significant change. An EMJ board meeting was scheduled for
November 7, 2005 after Credit Suisse had completed
additional financial analysis.
On November 7, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting and received a formal presentation from Credit
Suisse as to its preliminary financial analysis of EMJ.
EMJs board of directors then reviewed the letter and
summary of terms from Reliance and decided to make a
counterproposal. The board of directors directed Credit Suisse
to propose a $14.00 per share all cash purchase price and a
break up fee of 3% of the equity value. After discussion with
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP of the legal considerations of a
voting agreement and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso
Funds, the board directed Credit Suisse to propose a voting
agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject to
customary termination provisions if EMJs board of
directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of
the merger, and to reject the request for an option on the
shares owned by the Kelso Funds. EMJs board of directors
also discussed the potential treatment of stock options.
EMJs board of directors determined that the
counterproposal should contain provisions for vested Holding
options to be paid in cash, and for the EMJ options granted in
2005 to be rolled over into comparable Reliance options.
EMJs management team other than Mr. Nelson was asked
to leave the meeting and EMJs board of directors also
discussed a retention agreement for Mr. Johnson because of
the potential for reduced responsibilities for Mr. Johnson
following the merger. EMJs board of directors determined
it was appropriate to give Mr. Johnson a retention
agreement that would provide him with additional compensation up
to the limits of Section 280G of the Code. EMJs board
of directors then discussed a bonus pool to be provided for
EMJs senior management. The bonus pool would provide
compensation for the exceptional management performance that had
enabled EMJ to successfully complete the merger and financial
restructuring and initial public offering in 2005.
Mr. Nickell proposed a bonus pool of $5 million. The
allocation of the bonus pool would be based on the
recommendations of Mr. Nelson and the approval of those
allocations by EMJs board of directors. EMJs board
of directors unanimously approved the proposal and directed that
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement and the bonus pool
be included in the counterproposal to Reliance.
On November 11, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to discuss Reliances response to
EMJs counterproposal. Reliance had responded with a
purchase price of $12.30 per share, with consideration
consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock. Reliance
continued to ask for transaction protection provisions including
a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a voting
agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be
subject to termination upon a change in EMJs board of
directors recommendation, and an option on the stock held
by the Kelso Funds. Reliance agreed to the Johnson retention
agreement and the bonus pool as proposed. Reliance noted that it
would require 30 business days to complete formal due diligence
and negotiate definitive agreements and
48
requested exclusivity for that period. Credit Suisse reported
that UBS had indicated that Reliance was not prepared to pay
$14.00 per share, or to enter into a transaction that did
not contain 50% of the merger consideration in stock. EMJs
board of directors reviewed the Reliance proposal, and
instructed Credit Suisse to indicate that $12.30 per share
was not an acceptable price. The members of EMJs board of
directors were advised that because of their large holdings of
EMJ stock, the Kelso Funds would be the only EMJ stockholders
that would not be able to resell the Reliance common stock
received as merger consideration without those shares being
registered for resale. As a result, the members of EMJs
board of directors asked Credit Suisse to determine what
measures could be provided for the orderly sale of the Reliance
common stock that would be received by the Kelso Funds upon
completion of a transaction.
On November 17, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse on
discussions with UBS. Credit Suisse advised EMJs board of
directors that in their discussion with UBS, UBS had insisted
that it needed an indication of price to discuss a response with
Reliance. Credit Suisse had responded that they had no specific
instructions or authorization from EMJ, but suggested that a
price of $13.70 would reflect a decrease in EMJs current
position commensurate with the increase shown by Reliance from
its previous offer. UBS responded that its client would not make
another bid without a revised proposal from EMJ. UBS also
indicated that Reliance would be willing to provide liquidity
for the Kelso Funds in the form of customary registration rights
and to treat the Holding and EMJ options as requested. After
discussion, EMJs board of directors instructed Credit
Suisse to propose a purchase price of $13.25 per share and
to agree to merger consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50%
Reliance common stock and a due diligence period and exclusivity
of 30 business days. In addition, the proposal included a
symmetrical collar of 15% based on a trading period prior to
signing definitive documentation, and a break up fee of 3% of
the equity value.
On November 22, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse. Credit
Suisse reported that Reliance had proposed a purchase price of
$12.75 per share, with consideration consisting of 50% cash
and 50% Reliance common stock and an exchange ratio based on the
closing price of Reliance common stock on November 21,
2005, which was $64.11 per share, subject to a 15%
symmetrical collar, and a break up fee equal to 3% of the equity
value. Reliance continued to ask for a voting agreement between
Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be subject to
termination upon the withdrawal of or a change in the
recommendation of EMJs board of directors and an option on
the stock held by the Kelso Funds. After discussion, EMJs
board of directors instructed Credit Suisse to propose a
purchase price of $13.00 per share, with consideration
consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock, and a
customary mechanism of determining the exchange ratio in
connection with the collar based on the average closing price of
the Reliance stock for a period prior to signing of definitive
documentation. After additional discussion with Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP of the relevant legal considerations, EMJs
board of directors reiterated that the voting agreement should
be subject to customary termination provisions if EMJs
board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its
recommendation of the merger and that they would not allow the
Kelso Funds to provide an option on their shares.
On November 28, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Credit Suisse reported on its discussions with
UBS and reviewed a term sheet summarizing the terms of a
proposed transaction. Credit Suisse indicated that Reliance had
agreed to a purchase price of $13.00 per share of EMJ, with
consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common
stock. Reliance had also agreed to a symmetrical collar of 15%
on an exchange ratio to be determined based on the average
closing price of the Reliance common stock for a trading period
prior to signing definitive documentation to be negotiated, and
a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject
to customary termination provisions if EMJs board of
directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of
the merger. The parties had further agreed that due diligence
would commence immediately. The term sheet provided for an
exclusive period of 30 business days in which to complete due
diligence and negotiate and sign definitive documentation.
EMJs board of directors also decided to engage
Duff & Phelps to provide an independent fairness
opinion in connection with the transaction. Duff &
Phelps was selected because of their expertise as financial
advisor in mergers and acquisitions, as well as their past
involvement with EMJ as financial
49
advisor to the EMJ stock bonus plan, including in connection
with the merger and financial restructuring and initial public
offering in April 2005.
Representatives of Reliance commenced formal due diligence on
November 29, 2005, and due diligence continued throughout
the period up to the signing of the merger agreement. On
December 1, 2005, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP delivered
drafts of the merger agreement and the voting agreement to
Reliance and its representatives. On December 5, 2005,
representatives of EMJ followed up with supplemental requests
for diligence information from Reliance, which information was
received during the week following the request. A mutual due
diligence meeting was held on December 15, 2005, with EMJ
and Reliance management and their respective advisors. The
parties continued to negotiate the merger agreement, voting
agreement and other related documents through the first half of
January.
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors met to
review the merger agreement and discuss the proposed
transaction. EMJ management and representatives of Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP described the due diligence process and summarized
the results of EMJs due diligence on Reliance. Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP then discussed with EMJs board of
directors the legal principles and standards applicable to its
consideration of the proposed merger, described the material
terms of the merger agreement, voting agreement and the
transaction and discussed the projected timetable for the
transaction. Following discussion among, and questions by
EMJs board of directors and others present, Credit Suisse
reviewed with the board of directors its financial analysis with
respect to the merger consideration and rendered to the board of
directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by
delivery of a written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to
the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the
matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ
common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates). See
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to the Board of Directors of EMJ. Also at
this meeting, Duff & Phelps reviewed with the board of
directors its financial analysis with respect to the merger
consideration and rendered to EMJs board of directors an
oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a
written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to the effect that,
as of that date and based on and subject to the matters
described in its opinion, the merger consideration was fair,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common
stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds
and their respective affiliates). See Opinion of
Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors. Following further discussion and questions to
EMJs management and advisors, EMJs board of
directors determined that the merger was advisable and in the
best interests of EMJ and its stockholders and the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement were unanimously approved and adopted.
After approval by the respective boards of directors of EMJ and
Reliance, the merger agreement and voting agreement were
executed by the parties to such agreements and the proposed
merger was jointly announced by EMJ and Reliance on the evening
of January 17, 2006, after the close of U.S. financial
markets.
EMJs Reasons for the Merger
EMJs board of directors consulted with EMJs
management, as well as its legal and financial advisors, in its
evaluation of the merger. In reaching its conclusion to approve
the merger agreement and in determining that the merger is in
the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders, EMJs board
of directors considered a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the price being paid for each share of EMJ common stock
represents a substantial premium over historical trading prices,
including a premium of 30% over the initial public offering
price of $10.00, 24.6% over the closing sale price on the New
York Stock Exchange on January 17, 2005 (the trading day on
which EMJ announced the execution of the merger agreement), and
31.1% over the preceding 30-trading day average, 37.1% over the
preceding 60-trading day average and 36.5% over the preceding
90-trading day average; |
50
|
|
|
|
|
its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders
than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its
stockholders, including a business combination with another
company in the metals and steel industry (based on its belief
that no other company in the metals and steel industry with the
ability to acquire EMJ was likely to be interested in pursuing a
business combination with EMJ and no private investment
management firm or financial buyer was likely to offer a
purchase price greater than the purchase price agreed to with
Reliance); |
|
|
|
its belief that Reliance would be able to consummate the
transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations,
taking into account Reliances track record in successfully
integrating substantial acquisitions; |
|
|
|
its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not
likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near
future if EMJ continued as an independent company because of the
overhang of the Kelso Funds ownership interest, the
relatively low amount of EMJ common stock held by the public,
the low average daily trading volume of the EMJ common stock,
the cyclical nature of the steel and metals industry on which
EMJs business depends and general economic and market
conditions both on a historical and prospective basis; |
|
|
|
its belief that the 15% symmetrical collar protected the EMJ
stockholders from a possible decline within the collar range of
the Reliance common stock from its current trading levels; |
|
|
|
the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger
agreement, including the terms relating to the receipt and
consideration of alternative acquisition proposals; |
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to
the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be
able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction
to the Reliance common stock because approximately 50% of the
merger consideration consists of Reliance common stock; |
|
|
|
the market position of the combined company, including that it
will be an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled,
tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and
aluminum products; |
|
|
|
the likelihood that the regulatory approvals needed to complete
the transaction will be obtained; |
|
|
|
the historical and current market prices of Reliance common
stock and EMJ common stock as well as comparative valuation
analyses for the two companies; |
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Credit Suisse, including Credit
Suisses opinion dated January 17, 2006 to EMJs
board of directors as to the fairness of the merger
consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ common
stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to EMJs Board of Directors); |
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Duff & Phelps, including
Duff & Phelps opinion dated January 17,
2006, to EMJs board of directors as to the fairness of the
merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ
common stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries,
the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities,
LLC to EMJs Board of Directors); |
|
|
|
the expected tax treatment of the merger and the receipt by the
EMJ stockholders of the merger consideration; |
|
|
|
the expected impact of the transaction on the EMJ employees; |
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted, prior to
stockholder approval, to furnish information to and conduct
negotiations with third parties that make a takeover proposal; |
51
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted to
terminate the merger agreement, prior to stockholder approval,
in order to approve an alternative transaction proposed by a
third party that is a superior proposal, upon the payment to
Reliance of an approximately $20.5 million termination fee
(representing approximately 3% of the total equity value of EMJ)
(see The Merger Agreement Termination of the
Merger Agreement); |
|
|
|
the fact that the voting agreement between Reliance and the
Kelso Funds terminates if EMJs board of directors
withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger
(see The Voting Agreement); |
|
|
|
the availability of appraisal rights to holders of EMJ common
stock who comply with all of the required procedures under
Delaware law, which allow such holders to seek appraisal of the
fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court
of Chancery (see Dissenters Rights of
Appraisal and Annex E); and |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors understanding, after
consultation with its professional advisors, that both the
approximately $20.5 million termination fee and the
circumstances when such fee is payable, are reasonable and
customary in light of the benefits of the merger, commercial
practice and transactions of this size and nature. |
EMJs board of directors also considered potential risks
associated with the merger in connection with its deliberations
of the proposed transaction. These risks included the
possibility that the voting agreement, the non-solicitation
provisions of the merger agreement and the termination fee could
have the effect of discouraging other parties potentially
interested in a transaction with EMJ from proposing a
transaction, risks relating to the Reliance business, risks
relating to Reliances ability to successfully integrate
the EMJ business and realize the benefits of the merger, the
need to obtain EMJ stockholder and regulatory approvals in order
to complete the transaction; and the risks to EMJ if the merger
does not close, including the diversion of management and
employee attention, possible customer, vendor, employee and
other relationship attrition and resultant possible revenue
loss, relating to various aspects of EMJs business.
EMJs board of directors considered all the factors
outlined above, as well as these risks, as a whole, and overall
considered them on balance to be favorable to, and to support,
its determination.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by EMJs board of directors is not exhaustive,
but includes the material factors considered by EMJs board
of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors considered
by EMJs board of directors in connection with its
evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters,
EMJs board of directors did not consider it practical to,
nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in
reaching its decision. EMJs board of directors evaluated
the factors described above, including by asking questions of
EMJ management and EMJ legal and financial advisors, and reached
consensus that the merger was in the best interests of EMJ and
the EMJ stockholders. In considering the factors described
above, individual members of EMJs board of directors may
have given different weights to different factors.
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in the best
interests of EMJ and its stockholders. Accordingly, EMJs
board of directors unanimously approved the merger and the
merger agreement and unanimously recommends that EMJ
stockholders vote FOR adoption and approval of the
merger agreement.
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors
Credit Suisse has acted as financial advisor to EMJ in
connection with the merger.
In connection with the engagement of Credit Suisse, EMJs
board of directors requested that Credit Suisse evaluate the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ
common stock (other
52
than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their
respective affiliates), of the merger consideration to be
received by those stockholders pursuant to the merger. On
January 17, 2006, at a meeting of EMJs board of
directors held to evaluate the merger, Credit Suisse delivered
to such board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was
confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated the same date,
to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to
the matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration
to be received pursuant to the merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their
respective affiliates).
The full text of Credit Suisses written opinion to
EMJs board of directors, dated January 17, 2006,
which sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken, is
included as Annex C to this proxy statement/ prospectus and
is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/
prospectus. Holders of EMJ common stock are encouraged to read
this opinion carefully and in its entirety. Credit Suisses
opinion was provided to EMJs board of directors in
connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration and
relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ
common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates), and does not
address any other aspect or implication of the merger or any
other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the merger or otherwise, and does not constitute
a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act with respect to any matter relating to the
proposed merger. The summary of Credit Suisses opinion in
this proxy statement/ prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse reviewed the merger
agreement, certain related agreements and publicly available
business and financial information relating to EMJ and Reliance.
Credit Suisse also reviewed other information relating to EMJ
and Reliance, including financial forecasts provided to or
discussed with Credit Suisse by the managements of EMJ and
Reliance, and met with the managements of EMJ and Reliance to
discuss the businesses and prospects of EMJ and Reliance. Credit
Suisse also considered certain financial and stock market data
of EMJ and Reliance, and compared that data with similar data
for other publicly held companies in businesses Credit Suisse
deemed similar to those of EMJ and Reliance and considered, to
the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain
other business combinations and other transactions which have
recently been effected or announced. Credit Suisse also
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
that it deemed relevant.
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
information that it reviewed or considered and relied on that
information being complete and accurate in all material
respects. With respect to the financial forecasts relating to
EMJ and Reliance that Credit Suisse reviewed, Credit Suisse was
advised by the managements of EMJ and Reliance, and assumed,
that such forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
managements of EMJ and Reliance as to the future financial
performance of EMJ and Reliance, respectively. Credit Suisse
also assumed, with EMJs consent, that the merger would
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
Code. Credit Suisse further assumed, with EMJs consent,
that, in the course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or
third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with
the merger, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or
condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on
EMJ, Reliance or the contemplated benefits of the merger and
that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the
terms of the merger agreement without waiver, modification or
amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof.
In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and it did
not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets
or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of EMJ or Reliance, nor
was Credit Suisse furnished with any evaluations or appraisals.
Credit Suisses opinion was necessarily based on
information available to it, and financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated, on the
date of Credit Suisses opinion. Credit Suisse did not
express any opinion as to what the actual value of Reliance
common stock will be when issued to holders of EMJ
53
common stock pursuant to the merger or the prices at which
Reliance common stock will trade at any time. Credit
Suisses opinion did not address the relative merits of the
merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions
that might be available to EMJ or EMJs underlying business
decision to proceed with the merger.
In preparing its opinion to EMJs board of directors,
Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative
analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit
Suisses analyses described below is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving
various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant
methods of financial analysis and the application of those
methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a
fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Credit
Suisse made qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of each analysis and factor that it considered. Credit
Suisse arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of
all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did
not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any
one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing
on information presented in tabular format, without considering
all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of EMJ and
Reliance. No company, transaction or business used in Credit
Suisses analyses as a comparison is identical to EMJ,
Reliance or the proposed merger, and an evaluation of the
results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather,
the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning financial and operating characteristics and other
factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or
other values of the companies, business segments or transactions
analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisses
analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any
particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual
values or predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the
analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of
businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to
reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually
may be sold. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results
derived from, Credit Suisses analyses are inherently
subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisses opinion and financial analyses were only
one of many factors considered by EMJs board of directors
in its evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be
viewed as determinative of the views of EMJs board of
directors or management with respect to the merger or the merger
consideration. Although Credit Suisse evaluated the merger
consideration from a financial point of view, it was not
requested to, and did not, determine or recommend the specific
consideration to be paid in the transaction.
|
|
|
Analyses performed in Connection with the Preparation of
the Fairness Opinion by Credit Suisse |
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
Credit Suisse presented to EMJs board of directors on
January 17, 2006, in connection with the merger. The
financial analyses summarized below include information
presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit
Suisses financial analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data in the tables below without considering the
full narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisses
financial analyses.
54
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the
market values and trading multiples of the following publicly
traded North American metals service center companies:
|
|
|
North American Metals Service Center Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
Russel Metals Inc.
|
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
|
A.M. Castle & Co.
|
|
|
Novamerican Steel Inc.
|
|
|
Olympic Steel, Inc.
|
|
|
Multiples were based on closing stock prices on January 11,
2006. Estimated data for the selected companies were based on
publicly available research analysts estimates and public
filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise values, calculated as
equity value plus net debt, as multiples of calendar years 2005
and 2006 estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA. Credit Suisse
also compared equity values per share as multiples of calendar
years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per share. Credit Suisse
then applied a range of selected multiples described above for
the selected companies to corresponding financial data of EMJ.
Estimated data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of
EMJs management. This analysis indicated the following
approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as
compared to the merger consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$12.27 $15.04 |
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
Selected Transactions Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed
information relating to the following selected acquisitions and
announced offers to acquire, which Credit Suisse deemed relevant
to arriving at its opinion:
|
|
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Chapel Steel Corp. |
Apollo Management, L.P.
|
|
Metals USA, Inc. |
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
Integris Metals (Alcoa/BHP-B) |
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Precision Strip, Inc. |
Russel Metals Inc.
|
|
Acier Leroux Inc. |
Samuel, Son & Co.
|
|
Renown Steel (Slater Steel) |
Balli Group plc
|
|
Klöckner & Co. (E.ON AG) |
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
PittDes Moines (Steel Service Center Division) |
Multiples for the selected transactions were based on publicly
available financial information at the time of announcement of
the relevant transaction. Credit Suisse compared enterprise
values in the selected transactions as multiples of the latest
12 months revenue and EBITDA. Credit Suisse then applied
ranges of selected multiples derived from the selected
transactions to corresponding financial data of EMJ. Estimated
data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of EMJs
management. This analysis indicated the following implied per
share equity reference range for EMJ, as compared to the merger
consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$10.85 $13.59 |
|
$13.00 |
55
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the
stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that EMJ could
generate over calendar years 2006 through 2010 and the
enterprise value of EMJ at the end of that period. Estimated
financial data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of
EMJs management. Credit Suisse also calculated a range of
estimated terminal values (estimated value of future cash flow
from an asset at a particular point in time in the future) for
EMJ by multiplying EMJs calendar year 2010 estimated
EBITDA by selected multiples ranging from 5.00x to 6.50x. The
estimated after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were
then discounted to the present value using discount rates of
12.5% to 13.5%. This analysis indicated the following
approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as
compared to the merger consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$11.53 $14.86 |
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the
market values and trading multiples of North American metals
service center companies referenced above under the heading
EMJ Analyses Selected Companies
Analysis. Multiples were based on closing stock prices on
January 11, 2006. Estimated data for the selected companies
were based on publicly available research analysts
estimates and public filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise
values as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated
EBITDA. Credit Suisse also compared equity values per share as
multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per
share. Credit Suisse then applied a range of selected multiples
described above for the selected companies to corresponding
financial data of Reliance. Estimated data for Reliance were
based on internal estimates of Reliances management. This
analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share
equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to the closing
price of Reliance common stock on January 11, 2006:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
Closing Price of Reliance |
Reference Range for Reliance |
|
Common Stock on January 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
$63.37 $77.81 |
|
$65.49 |
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the
stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Reliance
could generate over calendar years 2006 through 2008 and the
enterprise value of Reliance at the end of that period.
Estimated financial data for Reliance were based on internal
estimates of Reliances management. Credit Suisse also
calculated a range of estimated terminal values for Reliance by
multiplying Reliances calendar year 2008 estimated EBITDA
by selected multiples ranging from 6.50x to 7.50x. The estimated
after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were then
discounted to the present value using discount rates of 11.5% to
12.5%. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied
per share equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to
the closing price of Reliance common stock on January 11,
2006:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
Closing Price of Reliance |
Reference Range for Reliance |
|
Common Stock on January 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
$55.55 $65.48 |
|
$65.49 |
EMJ selected Credit Suisse based on Credit Suisses
experience and reputation, and its familiarity with EMJ and its
business. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized
investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the
valuation of businesses and securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions,
56
leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive
biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and
other purposes.
EMJ has agreed to pay Credit Suisse customary fees for its
financial advisory services in connection with the merger, a
significant portion of which is contingent upon completion of
the merger. EMJ also has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for
its expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of legal
counsel and any other advisor retained by Credit Suisse, and to
indemnify Credit Suisse and related parties against liabilities,
including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising
out of its engagement.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates in the past have provided, are
currently providing, and in the future may provide, investment
banking and other financial services to EMJ, Reliance, the
private investment firms whose affiliates are EMJ stockholders,
and their respective affiliates (including having acted as
co-lead underwriter in connection with EMJs initial public
offering in April 2005), unrelated to the proposed merger, for
which services Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received,
and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a
full service securities firm, engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and
other financial services. In the ordinary course of business,
Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for
its or its affiliates own accounts and the accounts of
customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial
instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of EMJ,
Reliance and any other company that may be involved in the
merger and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities, as well as provide investment
banking and other financial services to such companies. In
addition, funds managed or advised by Credit Suisse or one or
more of its affiliates have investments in funds managed or
advised by affiliates of certain EMJ stockholders, including
Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P.
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors
On December 14, 2005, EMJs board of directors
retained Duff & Phelps to provide financial advisory
services with respect to the merger and to render an opinion as
to the fairness of the merger, from a financial point of view,
to EMJs stockholders other than Reliance, the Kelso Funds,
and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates. On
January 13, 2006, Duff & Phelps delivered a draft
written presentation to EMJs board of directors regarding
its fairness analysis. On January 17, 2006, Duff &
Phelps participated in a meeting and conference call with the
board of directors to discuss its previously transmitted written
presentation and to answer any questions regarding its analysis
and conclusions. Additionally, on January 17, 2006,
Duff & Phelps delivered its final presentation and
written opinion letter to the board of directors stating, in
part, that as of January 17, 2006, and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the merger was fair to the EMJ stockholders, other than the
excluded persons.
The full text of Duff & Phelps opinion, dated as
of January 17, 2006, which is attached as Annex D to
this proxy statement/ prospectus, sets forth, among other
things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered, and limitations of the review undertaken by
Duff & Phelps, which are described below. You are urged
to, and should, read Duff & Phelps opinion
carefully and in its entirety.
In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such
reviews, analyses and inquiries, as it deemed necessary and
appropriate under the circumstances. Duff &
Phelps due diligence with regard to the merger included,
but was not limited to, the items summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
Attended a due diligence meeting with individuals from: |
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ and Reliance management; |
|
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, legal counsel to EMJ; |
|
|
|
Credit Suisse; and |
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC, financial advisor to Reliance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Held additional discussions with EMJ management. |
57
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed a draft of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
January 16, 2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed a draft of the Voting Agreement dated January 13,
2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed EMJs financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 through 2005; |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
six-month periods ended September 29, 2004 and
September 28, 2005; |
|
|
|
Internal financial reports for the eight months ended
November 30, 2005; and |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by EMJ management for the last
quarter of fiscal 2006 and for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2007 through 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed Reliances financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 through 2004; |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and
2005; and |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by Reliance management for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 through 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed other operating, financial and legal information
regarding EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for comparable public companies. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed valuation metrics and premiums paid in
comparable merger transactions. |
|
|
|
Reviewed pertinent economic and industry information. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and prepared other studies, analyses and investigations
as we deemed appropriate. |
Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of
general economic, market and financial conditions, and its
experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and
with respect to transactions similar to the proposed merger. In
particular, Duff & Phelps did not make any independent
evaluation, appraisal or physical inspection of EMJs
solvency or of any specific assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise). Duff & Phelps opinion should not be
construed as a credit rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of
EMJs credit worthiness or otherwise as tax advice or as
accounting advice. In rendering its opinion, Duff &
Phelps relied upon the fact that EMJs board of directors
and EMJ have been advised by counsel as to all legal matters
with respect to the merger, including whether all procedures
required by law to be taken in connection with the merger have
been duly, validly and timely taken and Duff & Phelps
did not make, and assumes no responsibility to make, any
representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter.
In preparing its forecasts, performing its analysis and
rendering its opinion with respect to the merger,
Duff & Phelps: (1) relied upon the accuracy,
completeness, and fair presentation of all information, data,
advice, opinions and representations obtained from public
sources or provided to it from private sources, including EMJ
and Reliance management, and did not attempt to independently
verify such information, (2) assumed that any estimates,
evaluations and projections furnished to Duff & Phelps
were reasonably prepared and based upon the last currently
available information and good faith judgment of the person
furnishing the same and (3) assumed that the final versions
of all documents reviewed by them in draft form conform in all
material respects to the drafts reviewed. Duff &
Phelps opinion further assumes that information supplied
and representations made by EMJ and Reliance management are
substantially accurate regarding EMJ, Reliance and the merger.
Neither EMJ management nor EMJs board of
58
directors placed any limitations upon Duff & Phelps
with respect to the procedures followed or factors considered by
Duff & Phelps in rendering its opinion.
In its analysis and in connection with the preparation of its
opinion, Duff & Phelps made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business, market and
economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond
the control of any party involved in the merger. Duff &
Phelps has also assumed that all of the conditions precedent
required to implement the merger will be satisfied and that the
merger will be completed in accordance with the merger agreement
that was provided for its review.
The basis and methodology for Duff & Phelps
opinion have been designed specifically for the express purposes
of EMJs board of directors and may not translate to any
other purposes.
To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of
the facts on which Duff & Phelps opinion is based
proves to be untrue in any material respect, its opinion cannot
and should not be relied upon.
Duff & Phelps prepared its opinion effective as of
January 17, 2006. The opinion is necessarily based upon
market, economic, financial and other conditions as they existed
and could be evaluated as of such date, and Duff &
Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any
person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the opinion
which may come or be brought to the attention of Duff &
Phelps after such date.
Duff & Phelps opinion should not be construed as
creating any fiduciary duty on Duff & Phelps part
to any party.
Duff & Phelps opinion is not a recommendation as
to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger, or whether to proceed with the
merger or any related transaction, nor does it indicate that the
consideration received is the best possible attainable under any
circumstances. The decision as to whether to proceed with the
merger or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of
factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which
Duff & Phelps opinion is based. As a result, the
opinion and presentation of Duff & Phelps was only one
of many factors taken into consideration by EMJs board of
directors in making its determination with respect to the merger.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In addition, the process of preparing a fairness
opinion necessarily requires a broad range of subjective
judgments with respect to appropriate comparable companies,
appropriate multiples of various selected financial data,
appropriate discount rates and other financial and other
factors. Analyses and estimates of the values of companies do
not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices
at which companies or their securities may actually be sold.
In preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps performed
certain financial and comparative analyses summarized in the
following paragraphs. Duff & Phelps believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of such analyses and the factors it considered, without
considering all such analyses and factors, could create an
incomplete view of the analyses and the process underlying its
opinion. While the conclusions reached in connection with each
analysis were considered carefully by Duff & Phelps in
arriving at its opinion, Duff & Phelps made various
subjective judgments in arriving at its opinion and did not
consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, assign
relative weights to the individual analyses and specific factors
considered in reaching its opinion. Although these paragraphs
include some information in tabular format, those tables are not
intended to stand alone, and must be read together with the full
text of each summary and the limitations and qualifications in
the opinion.
Duff & Phelps analysis was comprised of the
following components: (1) an analysis of the merger
structure and the consideration to be received by the EMJ
stockholders, (2) an analysis of historical market trading
prices and volume for EMJ and Reliance common stock, (3) a
fundamental valuation analysis of EMJ common stock, (4) a
fundamental valuation analysis of Reliance common stock,
(5) a
59
fundamental valuation analysis of the post-transaction combined
company and (6) a premiums paid analysis.
|
|
|
Analysis of Merger Structure and Consideration |
Duff & Phelps estimated the total equity value of the
merger, including the purchase of outstanding common stock,
Reliances guarantee of the special contribution
obligation, the cash payment for certain EMJ options, and the
assumption of the remaining EMJ options, at approximately
$696 million. After including the value of debt assumed,
net of cash and the cash surrender value of the company owned
life insurance, or COLI, Duff & Phelps estimated the
total enterprise value of the merger at approximately
$944 million. These figures were then used by
Duff & Phelps to calculate implied valuation multiples
as discussed below.
In addition, Duff & Phelps observed that the collar
provided EMJ stockholders with a certain amount of protection
against movements in the price of Reliance stock, and that
movements in Reliances stock price above or below the
bounds of the collar would result in an increase or decrease,
respectively, in the total value of consideration to be received
and the amount of the premium over EMJs pre-announcement
trading price.
Duff & Phelps reviewed the historical trading prices
and volume of EMJ stock since its initial public offering in
April 2005. In particular, Duff & Phelps observed that
EMJ stock did not have a high level of liquidity, with daily
trading averaging approximately 90,000 shares per day over
the 90 days preceding its analysis, or only 0.2% of total
shares outstanding and 0.5% of the public float. Duff &
Phelps also observed that, since its initial public offering
date, EMJ shares had traded in a range of $6.70 to
$10.69 per share, and that the $13.00 per share
purchase price was well in excess of EMJs historical
trading range.
With respect to Reliance, Duff & Phelps observed that
its stock was substantially more liquid than EMJs, with
average daily trading of approximately 301,000 shares
during the 90 days preceding its analysis, representing
0.9% of shares outstanding and 1.1% of Reliances public
float. Duff & Phelps also observed that Reliances
stock price had increased significantly since July 2005,
reaching an all-time high of $67.06 on January 10, 2006.
However, Duff & Phelps also noted that the increased
stock price between July 2005 and January 2006 was generally in
line with the trading pattern of a market value weighted index
of steel service center stocks identified by Duff &
Phelps and that, even with the substantial increase over the
last six months, Reliance stock had actually underperformed the
aforementioned index over the past three years.
|
|
|
Market Valuation Multiples |
Duff & Phelps next presented an analysis of valuation
multiples as indicated by a group of selected comparable
companies, and also as indicated by a group of identified steel
industry merger and acquisition transactions.
Comparable Public Company Analysis. Duff &
Phelps comparable company analysis was based on a selected
group of comparable public companies. No company used in this
analysis is identical to EMJ or Reliance, and, accordingly, a
comparable company analysis involves complex and subjective
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operating characteristics of businesses and other factors
that affect trading prices of the various companies being
compared.
In the selection of comparable public companies, Duff &
Phelps used multiple databases to identify public companies that
are the most similar to EMJ and Reliance from an investment
perspective. The public companies selected by Duff &
Phelps generally have similar product lines, customer bases or
other business attributes which would cause an investor to group
these companies in the same broad industry
60
class for investment purposes. Duff & Phelps ultimately
included the 12 companies listed below in the comparison
group based on their investment risks, products and services
offered and target markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Castle Co.
Olympic Steel Inc.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
Russel Metals Inc.
Ryerson Inc.
Commercial Metals Co. |
|
Friedman Industries Inc.
Gibraltar Industries Inc.
Novamerican Steel Inc. |
|
Quanex Corp.
Steel Technologies Inc.
Worthington Industries Inc. |
Based on publicly reported financial data as well as published
earnings estimates for each of the selected comparable
companies, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain valuation
metrics, which are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price as a | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Enterprise | |
|
LTM | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LTM | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Revs. | |
|
EPS | |
|
EPS | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
Revs. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(All $ in millions valuations based on 1/13/06 closing prices) | |
High
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
|
$ |
6,573 |
|
|
|
14.7x |
|
|
|
14.3x |
|
|
|
8.1x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
10.4x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.87x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
7.1x |
|
|
|
4.0x |
|
|
|
4.8x |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
0.21x |
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
11.2x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
0.51x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
LTM = Latest 12 months
EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization
EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes
Enterprise Value = Stock price times shares outstanding plus
preferred stock, minority interest and interest-bearing debt
minus cash and equivalents
All earnings measures were adjusted for special items.
Comparable Transaction Analysis. Similar to the
comparable public company analysis, Duff & Phelps used
multiple databases and resources to identify comparable
controlling interest transactions involving companies with
similar product lines, customers or other business attributes.
Duff & Phelps identified relevant transactions that
were announced during the past three years and for which
adequate information was available to derive meaningful
valuation multiples. The 12 identified transactions are listed
below:
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
Buyer |
|
Dofasco,
Inc.(1)
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG |
Roanoke Electric Steel
Corp.(1)
|
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
Alabama Metal Industries Corp.
|
|
Gibraltar Industries, Inc. |
Chapel Steel Corp.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
Metals USA, Inc.
|
|
Apollo Advisors LP |
Harvest Partners, Inc./Edgen Corp.
|
|
Jefferies Group, Inc. |
Integris Metals Corp.
|
|
Ryerson Inc. |
International Steel Group, Inc.
|
|
Ispat International NV |
Commonwealth Industries, Inc.
|
|
IMCO Recycling, Inc. |
Arcelor SA/J&F Steel LLC
|
|
Ryerson Inc. |
Precision Strip Inc.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
Leroux Steel Inc.
|
|
Russel Metals Inc. |
61
Based on reported pricing and financial data regarding the
identified transactions, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain
valuation metrics, which are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(all $ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Enterprise Value as a | |
|
|
Multiple of | |
|
|
Enterprise | |
|
| |
|
|
Value | |
|
Sales | |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
High
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
|
2.02x |
|
|
|
8.9x |
|
|
|
13.9x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
0.16x |
|
|
|
3.4x |
|
|
|
3.7x |
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
|
0.63x |
|
|
|
5.7x |
|
|
|
7.6x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
0.47x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of EMJ |
Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of EMJ common
stock was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis,
and (2) a calculation of the valuation multiples implied by
the merger pricing and a comparison of such implied multiples
with the comparable public company multiples and the comparable
transaction multiples summarized above.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
performed a discounted cash flow analysis to derive indications
of total enterprise value and equity value. A discounted cash
flow analysis is designed to provide insight into the intrinsic
value of a business based on its projected earnings and capital
requirements as well as the net present value of projected
debt-free cash flows. Duff & Phelps based its
discounted cash flow analysis on projections of debt-free cash
flows of EMJ for the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the fiscal
years ending March 31, 2007 through 2011. These projections
were prepared by EMJ management and were not independently
verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis,
Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 12.5% to
13.5% to reflect the overall risk associated with EMJs
operations and projected financial performance. Duff &
Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of 2011 using two
methods: a constant growth dividend discount model, which
incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates from 1.5% to
2.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using an EBITDA
multiple in the range of 4.5x to 5.5x.
Based on its discounted cash flow analysis, Duff &
Phelps estimated total enterprise value ranging from
$795 million to $930 million. From its estimated
enterprise value, Duff & Phelps then deducted
EMJs debt net of cash and the cash surrender
value of the COLI and the value of outstanding stock
options, to arrive at a fully diluted equity value ranging from
$520 million to $646 million. Finally, dividing its
concluded fully diluted common equity value by
50.96 million common shares (including the special
contribution shares) resulted in rounded values ranging from
$10.00 per share to $13.00 per share, as compared with
the merger price of $13.00 per share.
Implied Transaction Multiples. Based on its estimates of
total equity value and total enterprise value under the terms of
the merger, as set forth above, Duff & Phelps
calculated the implied valuation multiples for the merger. In
calculating its implied valuation multiples, Duff &
Phelps adjusted EMJs historical and projected financial
results to remove the effect of extraordinary and non-recurring
items, as well as any financial statement effects of the COLI.
Duff & Phelps then compared the implied valuation
62
multiples with the median valuation multiples indicated by the
comparable public companies and the comparable transactions. The
results of Duff & Phelps analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Enterprise Value as Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Revenues | |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
Equity Value/ | |
|
|
|
|
Net ncome | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
EMJ Implied Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM 9/28/05
|
|
|
0.55x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
6.1x |
|
|
|
9.7x |
|
|
Projected FYE March 2006
|
|
|
0.54x |
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
8.3x |
|
|
Projected FYE March 2007
|
|
|
0.55x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
8.2x |
|
Comparable Public Companies Median Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
Projected Next Fiscal Year
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
Comparable Transactions Median Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Available Financial Results
|
|
|
0.47x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Duff & Phelps observed that the implied multiples of
enterprise value to revenue, for trailing performance and
projected performance are above the indicated median multiples
for the comparable public companies and the comparable
transactions for each period. With respect to the multiples of
enterprise value to EBITDA, EMJs implied multiples on a
trailing and projected basis are at or above the median multiple
for the identified transactions and slightly below the median
multiples for the comparable public companies. Duff &
Phelps further observed that, while the implied multiples of
EBIT are below those of the comparable companies and identified
transactions, the implied multiple of trailing 12 month net
income was above the median for the comparable companies. Based
on these observations, and taken as a whole, Duff &
Phelps determined that the valuation multiples implied by the
merger price supported a determination of fairness.
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of Reliance |
As with EMJ, Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of
Reliance was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis
and (2) a comparison of Reliances market-derived
valuation multiples with the comparable public company multiples
summarized above.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
based its discounted cash flow analysis on projections of
debt-free cash flows of Reliance for the fiscal years ending
December 31, 2006 through 2008. These projections were
prepared by Reliance management and were not independently
verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis,
Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 10.0% to
11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with
Reliances operations and projected financial performance.
Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of
2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend discount
model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates
from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using
an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. Duff &
Phelps used lower discount rates and higher terminal value
assumptions as compared with its analysis of EMJ to reflect the
stronger history of long-term growth and steady profitability as
well as the higher market valuation multiples at which Reliance
normally trades relative to its peers.
Based on its discounted cash flow analysis Duff &
Phelps estimated a total enterprise value of $2.27 billion
to $2.76 billion. From its estimated enterprise value,
Duff & Phelps then deducted Reliances debt, net
of cash, and the value of outstanding stock options, to arrive
at a fully diluted equity value ranging from $1.88 billion
to $2.35 billion. Finally, dividing its concluded fully
diluted common equity value by 33.1 million common shares
resulted in rounded values ranging from $57.00 per share to
$71.00 per share, as compared with Reliances most
recent closing price of $64.80 as of January 13, 2006, the
last full trading day prior to Duff & Phelps
presentation to EMJs board of directors. Duff &
Phelps also observed that the range of values resulting from its
discounted cash flow analysis generally supported the price
range of $53.86 per share to $72.86 per share
comprising the collar.
63
Market Multiples Analysis. As part of its analysis of the
value of Reliance common stock, Duff & Phelps compared
its current market valuation multiples with those of the
selected peer companies. The results of that analysis are
summarized in the table below:
(all $ in millions - valuations based on 1/13/06 closing
prices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Stock Price as | |
|
|
|
|
a Multiple of | |
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Enterprise | |
|
LTM | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LTM | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Revs. | |
|
EPS | |
|
EPS | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
Revs. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Reliance
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
|
11.4x |
|
|
|
12.8x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.79x |
|
Comparable Public Companies (includes Reliance) |
|
High
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
|
$ |
6,573 |
|
|
|
14.7x |
|
|
|
14.3x |
|
|
|
8.1x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
10.4x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.87x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
7.1x |
|
|
|
4.0x |
|
|
|
4.8x |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
0.21x |
|
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
11.2x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
0.51x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
Based on its analysis, Duff & Phelps observed that, by
every metric examined, Reliance was trading at a price that
represented a total valuation above the mean and median and, in
some cases, representing the highest multiple of all of the peer
companies. However, Duff & Phelps also analyzed
historical financial and market trading data and calculated
Reliances EBITDA multiple and
price-to-earnings
multiple as of the end of each calendar quarter for the past ten
years. Duff & Phelps analysis revealed that, as
of the end of 35 out of the last 40 quarters, Reliance traded at
an EBITDA multiple that represented a premium to the industry
median and that, over the
10-year period,
Reliances average quarter-end EBITDA multiple was 8.8x as
compared with the average of 6.6x for the comparable public
companies. Duff & Phelps analysis revealed
similar findings with respect to Reliances
price-to-earnings
multiple, with Reliance trading at a premium as of the end of 34
out of 40 quarters and a
10-year average
multiple of 15.7x as compared with the average of 11.8x for the
comparable public companies. Therefore, Duff & Phelps
concluded that the premium multiple at which Reliance was
trading as of the date of its analysis did not necessarily
indicate that Reliance stock was overvalued in the marketplace.
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of the Post-Transaction
Combined Company |
Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of the
post-transaction combined company was based on: (1) a
discounted cash flow analysis, and (2) an application of
selected valuation multiples to pro forma earnings measures for
the post-transaction combined company.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
used the fiscal year projections from its analysis of EMJ and
adjusted them to a calendar year basis, and then combined the
adjusted EMJ projection with the financial projections provided
by Reliance management to derive a combined company projection
for calendar 2006 through 2008. As with the stand-alone analysis
of Reliance, Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging
from 10.0% to 11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with
the combined companys operations and projected financial
performance. Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value
at the end of 2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend
discount model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth
rates from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method
using an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. The
discounted cash flow analysis of the post-transaction combined
company resulted in total enterprise value indications ranging
from $3.36 billion to $4.31 billion.
Market Multiples Analysis. Based on actual reported
financial results and the financial projections discussed above,
Duff & Phelps derived pro forma trailing 12 month
and calendar 2006 EBITDA, EBIT
64
and Net Income, and then selected valuation multiples to apply
to each of these measures of income. Duff &
Phelps market multiples analysis is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Range of | |
|
Total Debt | |
|
|
|
Indicated Range | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on Actual Reported | |
|
Financial Results | |
|
and t |
|
he Financial Projections | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
Valuation Multiples | |
|
(Net of Cash) | |
|
|
|
of Enterprise Values | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(rounded) | |
EBITDA LTM
|
|
$ |
536,275 |
|
|
x |
|
|
6.50x - 7.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,486,000 - $4,022,000 |
|
EBITDA Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
557,467 |
|
|
x |
|
|
6.50x - 7.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,624,000 - $4,181,000 |
|
EBIT LTM
|
|
$ |
478,662 |
|
|
x |
|
|
7.50x - 8.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,590,000 - $4,069,000 |
|
EBIT Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
500,917 |
|
|
x |
|
|
7.50x - 8.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,757,000 - $4,258,000 |
|
Net Income LTM
|
|
$ |
256,544 |
|
|
x |
|
|
11.00x - 12.00x |
|
|
|
954,695 |
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,777,000 - $4,033,000 |
|
Net Income Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
273,121 |
|
|
x |
|
|
10.50x - 11.50x |
|
|
|
954,695 |
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,822,000 - $4,096,000 |
|
Valuation Conclusion. As outlined above, the
Duff & Phelps market multiples analysis resulted
in an indicated range of enterprise values from
$3.49 billion to $4.26 billion. Combining the results
of the market multiples analysis with the discounted cash flow
analysis, Duff & Phelps concluded that a range of
$3.36 billion to $4.07 billion represented a
reasonable range of total enterprise value for the
post-transaction combined company. Duff & Phelps then
deducted its estimate of pro forma post-transaction debt (net of
cash) and the value of post-transaction Reliance options to
arrive at a fully diluted common equity value ranging from
$2.35 billion to $3.03 billion. Finally, dividing by
Duff & Phelps estimate of 38.4 million
post-transaction shares resulted in an estimated value ranging
from $61.00 per share to $79.00 per share,
representing an increase from Reliances valuation range on
a standalone basis.
Duff & Phelps identified acquisitions announced during
the last two years involving publicly traded steel industry
targets, excluding bankrupt and distressed target companies, and
calculated the premiums paid or offered in those transactions.
Six relevant transactions were identified and are shown below:
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
Buyer |
|
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG |
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
|
|
Arcelor SA |
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.(1)
|
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
Metals USA, Inc.
|
|
Apollo Advisors LP |
International Steel Group, Inc.
|
|
Mittal Steel Company NV/ Ispat International NV |
Commonwealth Industries, Inc.
|
|
Aleris International, Inc. |
|
|
(1) |
Pending transaction |
(2) |
Dofasco has received competing bids |
Based on its analysis of the transactions identified above, its
analysis of the merger, and market data available through
January 13, 2006 (the latest full trading day prior to
Duff & Phelps presentation to EMJs board of
directors), Duff & Phelps derived the following
information with respect to premiums paid/offered:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
1 Day | |
|
5 Day | |
|
20 Day | |
|
30 Day | |
|
20-Day Avg. | |
|
|
| |
Identified Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
36.8% |
|
|
|
34.6% |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
23.8% |
|
|
|
31.7% |
|
|
Median
|
|
|
41.5% |
|
|
|
41.7% |
|
|
|
26.7% |
|
|
|
23.7% |
|
|
|
31.1% |
|
Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
26.8% |
|
|
|
31.6% |
|
|
|
30.0% |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
31.8% |
|
(assumes 1/17/06 as announcement date)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
In addition to steel industry transactions, Duff &
Phelps compared the premium implied by the merger price to
overall average premiums in the domestic merger and acquisition
market. The published data that Duff & Phelps used
regarding overall acquisition premiums are based on a comparison
of transaction prices with the market prices of the target
companies five days prior to announcement. The table below
summarizes the average market premiums for the overall merger
and acquisition market in 2004 and 2005. As shown in the table
above, the most comparable figure for EMJ the
premium versus market price five days prior to
announcement is 31.6%, which is in excess of the
overall market average for each of the last two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Overall Average Premium All Industries
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
Number of Transactions
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
In summary, Duff & Phelps made the following
observations:
|
|
|
|
|
The merger price is at the high end of the valuation range
indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis for EMJ, and the
valuation multiples implied by the merger price are generally in
line with the valuation multiples exhibited by the comparable
public companies and the comparable transactions. |
|
|
|
The merger price is above any price at which EMJ has traded
since its initial public offering date, and the premium over
recent trading prices is generally in line with premiums paid in
the steel industry and the overall public company merger and
acquisition market over the past two years. |
|
|
|
The current price of Reliance common stock is within the range
of values indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis, and
valuation multiples implied by Reliances current stock
price are at the high end of the range as compared with the peer
companies, but such premium is consistent with the premium
market valuation of Reliance over the past ten years. |
|
|
|
The inclusion of the collar in the merger structure provides EMJ
stockholders with significant protection against movements in
Reliances stock price prior to closing. |
|
|
|
Although EMJ stockholders will receive cash and stock, except
for the Kelso Funds, those stockholders unwilling to hold
Reliance shares will be able to immediately liquidate their
securities in the open market. |
Duff & Phelps is a nationally recognized investment
banking firm that is regularly engaged to render financial
opinions in connection with mergers and acquisitions, tax
matters, ESOP and ERISA matters, corporate planning and other
purposes. Previously, Duff & Phelps has provided EMJ
with: (1) financial advisory services with respect to
EMJs litigation with the Department of Labor, (2) the
appraisal of capital stock for administration of EMJs
stock bonus plan (the predecessor to EMJs retirement
savings plan), and (3) fairness opinions in connection with
EMJs merger and financial restructuring consummated in
April 2005.
EMJ has paid Duff & Phelps a fixed fee of $600,000 in
connection with the services provided by it under this
engagement. No portion of Duff & Phelps fees was
contingent upon completion of the merger or the conclusion
reached by Duff & Phelps in its fairness opinion. EMJ
has also agreed to reimburse Duff & Phelps for its
expenses incurred in performing its services and to indemnify
Duff & Phelps and its affiliates, their respective
directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if
any, controlling Duff & Phelps or any of its affiliates
against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain
liabilities under federal securities laws, related to or arising
out of Duff & Phelps engagement and any related
transactions.
66
Reliances Reasons for the Merger
Reliances general business strategy includes the
acquisition of assets or businesses that are a logical extension
of its existing businesses in order to (1) increase cash
flow and earnings, (2) expand its geographic and customer
diversification and (3) expand its product diversification
in the metals service center industry. As shown in
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information,
Reliance believes that on a pro forma basis, the acquisition of
EMJ will be immediately accretive to Reliances earnings.
The acquisition of EMJ will allow Reliance to expand its
presence in the Midwest, New England and Canada. The acquisition
of EMJ will also permit Reliance to increase the diversity of
its products, in areas such as specialty bar and tubing and
other specialty metal products that are not a principal part of
Reliances present product line. This diversification of
products should enable Reliance to further expand its customer
base into new industries.
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement,
Reliances board of directors consulted with Reliance
management and its financial and legal advisors, and considered
a variety of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Other available acquisition opportunities in the metals service
center business and Reliances business, operations,
financial condition, earnings, prospects and acquisition
strategy; |
|
|
|
The business, operations, financial condition, earnings and
prospects of EMJ; |
|
|
|
The ability of EMJs operations to enhance Reliances
geographic, customer and product diversification; |
|
|
|
Potential contingent liabilities associated with EMJ and its
assets, including litigation, environmental and regulatory
issues; |
|
|
|
EMJs well-qualified and stable management team with the
capacity to effectively manage EMJs operations on a
going-forward basis in a manner complementary to the operations
of Reliance; |
|
|
|
EMJs size and complementary product mix, geographic
diversity and profitability; |
|
|
|
Recognizing that there can be no assurance as to future
financial results, the anticipated financial impact of the
merger on Reliances financial performance, including the
anticipated impact on Reliances earnings and cash flow per
share; |
|
|
|
The capital structure of Reliance following the merger,
including Reliances ability to finance the cash portion of
the merger consideration under its existing revolving credit
facility and to continue to reduce indebtedness at a
satisfactory rate following the merger; |
|
|
|
The structure of the merger and the financial and other terms of
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
The expectation that the merger will qualify as a tax-deferred
reorganization for purposes of Section 368(a)
of the Code; and |
|
|
|
|
The opinion of UBS Securities LLC that, as of the date of and
based on and subject to the matters described in the opinion,
the merger consideration to be paid by Reliance, in the
aggregate, pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a
financial point of view to Reliance. |
|
While a decision to complete the merger did not include an
analysis by Reliance of potential synergies, Reliance believes
that synergies may be realized through the integration of
financial reporting, the removal of redundant public company
costs, enhanced metals sourcing, and the sharing of best
practices which have the potential to improve the financial
results of EMJ and also provide benefits to Reliance.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by Reliances board of directors is not
exhaustive but does include the material factors considered by
the Reliance board of directors. Reliances board of
directors did not quantify or assign any relative or specific
weights to the various
67
factors that it considered. Rather, Reliances board of
directors based its decision to approve the merger agreement on
the totality of the information presented to and considered by
it.
Management and Operations Following the Merger
Consistent with Reliances historical acquisition strategy,
EMJ will continue to operate relatively independently. Reliance
management believes little operational integration will be
necessary. With the exception of EMJs chief executive
officer, Mr. Nelson, who will retire upon the closing of
the merger but will continue as a consultant during a
post-closing transition period, the existing management team of
EMJ is expected to remain in place and continue to operate EMJ
on a going-forward basis. Reliance has no current plans to close
or downsize any of EMJs present facilities nor does
Reliance anticipate any material changes in EMJs
employment levels. The directors of EMJ after the merger will be
the directors of RSAC prior to the merger, plus
Mr. McCaffery and Mr. Johnson from EMJ. The executive
officers of EMJ will include the executive officers of EMJ prior
to the merger, other than Mr. Nelson, as well as certain
officers of Reliance.
Interests of EMJs Directors and Executive Officers in
the Merger
In considering the recommendation of EMJs board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement and the merger,
EMJs stockholders should be aware that some of EMJs
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition
to, those of EMJs stockholders generally. These interests
and arrangements may create potential conflicts of interest.
EMJs board of directors was aware of these potential
conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters,
in reaching its decisions to approve the merger agreement and
the merger and to recommend that EMJs stockholders vote in
favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger.
|
|
|
Nelson Retention Agreement |
On December 17, 2004, Mr. Nelson entered into a
retention agreement with EMJ whereby EMJ agreed to pay
Mr. Nelson a bonus of $3 million on March 31,
2007, if he continues to serve as EMJs President and chief
executive officer through such date. Pursuant to the retention
agreement, Mr. Nelson is also entitled to the bonus if his
employment with EMJ is terminated by Mr. Nelson for good
reason, which includes ongoing diminution in
Mr. Nelsons title, duties or responsibilities or a
material reduction in his base salary or benefits.
Mr. Nelsons employment as chief executive officer
will terminate for good reason (as defined in the retention
agreement) upon completion of the merger and Mr. Nelson
will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million
six months after completion of the merger and his termination.
|
|
|
Johnson Retention Agreement |
On January 17, 2006, Mr. Johnson, EMJs vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary, entered into a
retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment and
severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless
terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement provides generally
that Mr. Johnsons terms and conditions of employment
(including position, responsibility, location, compensation, and
benefits) will not be adversely changed during the term of the
agreement and provides for certain minimum guaranteed
compensation levels (including base salary, annual bonus,
long-term incentives, and participation in benefit plans) during
such term.
On the six-month anniversary of the effective time of the
merger, if Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or
any affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to
a bonus of approximately $425,000. On the twelve-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, if
Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or any
affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to an
additional bonus of $200,000. If EMJ terminates
Mr. Johnsons employment without cause or if
Mr. Johnson terminates his employment for good
reason (as defined in the retention agreement and
summarized
68
below) with an effective termination date prior to the six-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then
Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive the six-month
bonus. If EMJ terminates Mr. Johnsons employment
without cause or if Mr. Johnson terminates his employment
for good reason with an effective termination date on or after
the six-month anniversary and prior to the twelve-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then
Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive a pro rata portion
of the twelve-month bonus based on the number of days elapsed
since the effective time of the merger. For purposes of
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement, good
reason is defined generally to include a material
reduction of his base salary or bonus and incentive
compensation, material adverse changes to
Mr. Johnsons disability policies or life or
disability insurance benefits, unless such changes affect all
senior executives equally, and certain relocations.
|
|
|
Special Bonus Plan for Senior Management |
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors approved
a special bonus plan for senior management providing that,
immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a
taxable bonus to certain members of EMJ senior management in
connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be
allocated to such members of EMJs senior management as
determined by EMJs board of directors.
The table below sets forth the bonus awards expected to be
granted to each executive officer of EMJ pursuant to the special
bonus plan for senior management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of | |
Name |
|
Bonus Award | |
|
|
| |
R. Neil McCaffery
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
Frank D. Travetto
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
Kenneth L. Henry
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
James D. Hoffman
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
William S. Johnson
|
|
$ |
625,000 |
|
As of the record date, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates,
including two of EMJs directors, hold
25,205,133 shares of EMJs common stock, of which the
Kelso Funds hold 25,174,634 shares representing 50.1% of
the issued and outstanding shares of EMJs common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and their
affiliates will receive aggregate merger consideration
consisting of approximately $163.8 million in cash and
2,248,297 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the
average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the
pricing period is equal to $79.89, which would be the average
closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended
on February 22, 2006).
Of the 25,205,133 shares held by the Kelso Funds and their
affiliates, (1) 22,445,810 shares are owned of record
by KIA IV, (2) 11,616 shares are owned of record by
KEP II, (3) 1,704,740 shares are owned of record
by KIA III EMJ, (4) 1,012,468 shares
are owned of record by or KIA I. In addition, 5,000 shares
are owned of record by George E. Matelich (a general partner of
Kelso Partners IV, L.P., or KP IV, which is the general partner
of KIA IV, and a general partner of KEP II),
5,000 shares are owned of record by Thomas R. Wall, IV
(a general partner of KP IV and a general partner of
KEP II) and 20,499 shares are owned of record by Frank
T. Nickell. Mr. Nickell is a general partner of KP I,
KP III and KP IV. Mr. Nickell is also President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of Kelso & Companies,
Inc., which is the general partner of Kelso & Company,
L.P. Mr. Nickell is deemed to beneficially own
25,195,133 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Nickell
owns 20,499 shares of record and will receive approximately
$133,000 and 1,828 shares of Reliance common stock in the
merger (assuming the average closing price of the Reliance
common stock for the pricing period is equal to $79.89).
Mr. Nickell disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities owned or deemed beneficially owned by each of the
Kelso Funds pursuant to
Rule 13d-4 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act. Mr. Nickell is a director of EMJ and shares investment
and voting power with respect to shares of
69
EMJs common stock held by the Kelso Funds.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is a general partner of KP IV and a managing
director and a member of the board of directors of
Kelso & Companies, Inc., KP I, KP III and
KP IV are the general partners of KIA I,
KIA III-EMJ and KIA IV, respectively. Mr. Wahrhaftig
is a director of EMJ and shares investment and voting power with
respect to shares of EMJs common stock held by KIA IV.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is deemed to beneficially own
22,457,426 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Wahrhaftig
holds no shares of EMJ common stock of record and will not
directly receive any merger consideration. Mr. Wahrhaftig
disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities owned or deemed
beneficially owned by each of the Kelso Funds pursuant to
Rule 13d-4 under
the Exchange Act.
The Kelso Funds have entered into the voting agreement with
Reliance pursuant to which they have agreed to vote the
25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock held by them in favor
of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
Reliance also entered into the registration rights agreement
with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to
the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds
in the merger.
|
|
|
Merger Consideration to be Received by EMJs
Executive Officers and Directors |
EMJs executive officers participate in EMJs
retirement savings plan and EMJs executive officers and
some of EMJs directors participate in EMJs equity
plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon
completion of the merger, executive officers and certain
directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as
the other EMJ stockholders for their EMJ common stock and will
receive cash or options to purchase Reliance common stock for
their EMJ stock options. See The Merger
Agreement Merger Consideration and The
Merger Agreement Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and
Other Equity-Based Awards.
70
The table below sets forth for each executive officer and
director of EMJ, other than those affiliated with the Kelso
Funds, (1) the shares of EMJ common stock beneficially
owned, (2) the options to purchase shares of EMJ common
stock granted pursuant to the EMJ incentive plan, (3) the
options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock granted pursuant
to the Holding option plan, (4) the number of options to
purchase Reliance common stock to be received upon conversion of
options to purchase EMJ common stock under the EMJ incentive
plan (assuming an average closing price of Reliance common stock
for the pricing period of $79.89) and (5) the amount of
cash to be received in exchange for the options outstanding
under the Holding option plan at $13.00 per share less the
actual exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock Pursuant to | |
|
Stock Pursuant to | |
|
Reliance Common | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
the EMJ Incentive | |
|
the Holding Option | |
|
Stock to be | |
|
Cash for Holding | |
Name |
|
Owned | |
|
Plan | |
|
Plan | |
|
Received | |
|
Stock Options | |
| |
David M. Roderick
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
176,410 |
(1) |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,707,331.26 |
|
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
|
|
|
6,533.8682 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
1,693,538 |
(2) |
|
|
8,920 |
|
|
$ |
16,816,832.34 |
|
Dr. John Rutledge
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
(3) |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
678,432.29 |
|
William A. Marquard
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
(3) |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
678,432.29 |
|
Earl L. Mason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. ODonnell, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew G. Sharkey, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
R. Neil McCaffery
|
|
|
32,028.1751 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
Frank D. Travetto
|
|
|
33,502.8509 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
Kenneth L. Henry
|
|
|
131,545.2923 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
James D. Hoffman
|
|
|
17,074.5286 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
William S. Johnson
|
|
|
9,665.0748 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
123,488 |
(5) |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,125,438.13 |
|
|
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance |
RSAC has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and
provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present
directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries
for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a
period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed, and
has agreed to cause RSAC, to maintain and preserve, RSACs
certificate of incorporation and bylaws to contain provisions
regarding exculpation, indemnification and advancement of
expenses for officers, directors and employees of EMJ that
overall are no less generous than those included in the current
EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor all of
EMJs obligations to indemnify all officers, directors and
employees of EMJ for acts and omissions by such persons prior to
the completion of the merger to the extent such obligations
existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations survive the
effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in full force and
effect in accordance with the terms of the relevant document
until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
For a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed
to maintain the current policies of directors and
officers liability insurance and fiduciary liability
insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to claims arising from
or related to facts or events that occurred prior to the merger
and with a total insured coverage of $50 million of
directors and officers liability insurance and
$5 million of fiduciary liability insurance; provided that
if the annual insurance premium payments for both insured
coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will obtain a
policy with the most advantageous terms available for that
premium payment amount.
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements
Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash
consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ
stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately
4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its
71
common stock and assume approximately $286 million of
EMJs debt (based on EMJs outstanding indebtedness as
of December 30, 2005).
Reliance and EMJ expect to incur transaction-related costs
aggregating approximately $18.7 million (including
financial advisory, legal, accounting, consulting and public
relations fees, registration and regulatory filing fees and
printing and mailing costs associated with this proxy statement/
prospectus). In addition, Reliance will incur a maximum of
$10.5 million for the payment of retention bonuses,
management bonuses, severance payments and other change of
control benefits pursuant to existing EMJ contracts in
connection with the merger.
Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the
consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders
in the merger, as well as other expenses of the transaction,
through a combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on
its existing credit facility. Reliance has obtained all
necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to
complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a
condition precedent to Reliances obligation to effect the
merger.
EMJs Financing Arrangements
EMJ has outstanding $250 million of
93/4% notes.
As a result of the merger, the holders of the
93/4% notes
have the option to require their redemption at 101% of face
value. Pursuant to the terms of the
93/4% notes,
Reliance will offer to buy the
93/4% notes,
although it does not expect many of the holders of the
93/4% notes
to accept the offer due to the interest rate they are receiving,
a current trading value of approximately 109%, and the strength
of Reliances financial condition. Reliance plans to pay
the balance of EMJs current $300 million credit
facility, which will release the liens held by EMJs
lenders under that facility. Reliance will then provide EMJ with
a revolving credit arrangement whereby EMJ can borrow as needed
from Reliance and repay Reliance with interest at market
interest rates.
Regulatory Matters
|
|
|
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act |
The merger is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act. The
HSR Act requires that each party participating in an acquisition
transaction meeting certain size thresholds notify and provide
certain information and materials to the Federal Trade
Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice and certain waiting periods must be terminated or must
expire before the subject transaction can be completed. EMJ and
Reliance filed their respective notification and report forms on
January 20, 2006. The waiting period expired on
February 21, 2006.
At any time before or after completion of the merger, the
Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice may,
however, challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. Private
parties also could take action under the antitrust laws,
including seeking an injunction prohibiting or delaying the
merger, divestiture or damages under certain circumstances.
Additionally, at any time before or after the completion of the
merger, notwithstanding expiration or termination of the
applicable waiting period, any state could take action under the
antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public
interest. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the
merger will not be made or that, if a challenge is made, EMJ and
Reliance will prevail.
|
|
|
Bermuda Monetary Authority |
The corporate and insurance laws of Bermuda govern the business
and operations of Stainless Insurance Ltd., a captive
insurance subsidiary of EMJ, whose entire issued and outstanding
share capital will be held by RSAC as a result of the merger.
The treatment of Stainless Insurance Ltd.s share capital
in the merger cannot be accomplished without (1) the
consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authorization and
Compliance Division) pursuant to the Exchange Control Act 1972
and (2) the no objections approval from the
Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division) under the
Insurance Act 1978. The consent of
72
the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authorization and Compliance
Division) and the no objection approval from the
Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division) have been
received.
|
|
|
Canadian Regulatory Filings |
The Investment Canada Act governs the acquisition of EMJs
Canadian subsidiary by Reliance. Pursuant to the Investment
Canada Act, Reliance will make a notice filing with the Canadian
Director of Investments following the completion of the merger.
We are not aware of any other federal or state regulatory
requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must
be obtained to consummate the merger. We also may be required to
make filings and obtain regulatory approvals from various other
governmental authorities. Where necessary, the parties intend to
make such filings. See The Merger Agreement
Additional Covenants Reasonable Best Efforts
and The Merger Agreement Conditions to
Closing.
Accounting Treatment
Reliance intends to account for the merger under the purchase
method of accounting for business combinations under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the
purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase
price is allocated to the net identifiable tangible and
intangible assets of an acquired entity based on their estimated
fair values as of the completion of the merger, with any excess
being treated as goodwill. A final determination of these fair
values will include managements consideration of a
valuation prepared by an independent valuation specialist. This
valuation will be based on the actual net tangible and
intangible assets of the acquired entity that exist as of the
closing date of the transaction. Reliance will include
EMJs results of operations in Reliances consolidated
financial statements from the date of completion of the merger.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and
Reliance
The shares of Reliance common stock to be received by EMJs
stockholders in connection with the merger will be registered
under the Securities Act and will be freely transferable, except
for shares of Reliance common stock issued to any person who is
deemed to be an affiliate of EMJ or Reliance at the effective
time of the merger. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates
include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by,
or are under common control with EMJ and may include the
executive officers, directors and significant stockholders of
EMJ or Reliance. Affiliates may not sell their shares of
Reliance common stock acquired in connection with the merger
except pursuant to:
|
|
|
|
|
an effective registration statement under the Securities Act
covering the resale of those shares; |
|
|
|
Rule 145 (or for EMJ stockholders who become affiliates of
Reliance, Rule 144) under the Securities Act; or |
|
|
|
any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act. |
The merger agreement requires EMJ to use its reasonable best
efforts to cause each of its affiliates to execute a written
agreement to the effect that such person will not offer to sell
or otherwise dispose of any of the shares of Reliance common
stock issued to such person in or pursuant to the merger except
in compliance with the Securities Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder. Reliances
registration statement on
Form S-4, of which
this proxy statement/ prospectus forms a part, may not be used
in connection with the resale of shares of Reliance common stock
received in the merger by affiliates.
Reliance has entered into the registration rights agreement with
the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain
73
demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the
shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in
the merger.
Stock Market Listing
An application was filed with the New York Stock Exchange on
February 28, 2006 for listing: (1) the shares of
Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger, (2) the
shares of Reliance common stock issuable upon exercise of the
options to purchase Reliance common stock upon the conversion of
options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock in connection
with the merger and (3) the shares of Reliance common stock
to be issued to the retirement savings plan pursuant to
EMJs obligation under such plan. If the merger is
completed, EMJ common stock will be delisted from the New York
Stock Exchange and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
74
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following describes certain aspects of the merger,
including material provisions of the merger agreement. The
following description of the merger agreement is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the merger agreement,
which is attached to this document as Annex A and is
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
We urge you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety, as it is the legal document governing the merger.
Structure of the Merger
In accordance with the merger agreement and Delaware law, EMJ
will merge with and into RSAC, a direct and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Reliance. As a result of the merger, the separate
corporate existence of EMJ will cease, and RSAC will survive as
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. As part of the merger,
RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company.
Merger Consideration
If we complete the merger, EMJ stockholders will be entitled to
receive for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock $6.50 in
cash and a to-be-determined fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock component
will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to adjustment. The
value of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for each
share of EMJ common stock will be determined based upon the
average Reliance stock price. If the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be more than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for
each share of EMJ common stock; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock. |
The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive
in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest
whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by
the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common
stock in the merger. Instead, you will be entitled to receive
cash, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance
common stock you might otherwise have been entitled to receive,
based on the average closing price of Reliance common stock for
the pricing period.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special
meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger
consideration you will receive on the date the merger is
completed.
We will adjust the value or number of shares of Reliance common
stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common
stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period. If the average Reliance price
stock is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common
stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average Reliance stock
price; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own. |
75
The following table provides some examples of how the formula
above works to determine the exchange ratio and the
corresponding value of the Reliance common stock that you will
receive for a share of EMJ common stock at various average
Reliance stock prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value of Cash | |
|
|
|
|
Value of Reliance | |
|
|
|
and Reliance | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock per | |
|
Cash per Share of | |
|
Common Stock per | |
|
|
|
|
Share of EMJ Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
Share of EMJ | |
Average Reliance Stock Price |
|
Exchange Ratio | |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$40
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
11.33 |
|
$45
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
11.93 |
|
$50
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
6.03 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
12.53 |
|
$53.86 - $72.86
|
|
|
0.1207 - 0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
$75
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.19 |
|
$80
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.64 |
|
$85
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
7.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate
prior to the merger. Therefore, because the value and number of
shares of Reliance common stock you receive in the merger is
determined based upon the average closing price of Reliance
common stock for the pricing period, you should obtain current
stock price quotations for Reliance common stock prior to voting
on the merger. You should also note that, because the exchange
ratio is fixed two trading days before the closing of the merger
and we expect the market price of Reliance common stock to
fluctuate, the value of the Reliance common stock that you will
receive in the merger may increase or decrease during the
two-day trading period between the end of the pricing period and
the closing of the merger.
Based upon 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock
outstanding as of February 24, 2006, and an assumed
exchange ratio of 0.0892, which is based on the average closing
market price of Reliance common stock during the 20 consecutive
trading days ended February 22, 2006, Reliance will issue
an aggregate of approximately 4.5 million shares of
Reliance common stock in the merger to the holders of these
shares of EMJ common stock. Based upon the
33,155,949 shares of Reliance common stock outstanding as
of February 22, 2006, the holders of these shares of EMJ
common stock collectively will hold approximately 11.9% of the
shares of Reliance common stock outstanding immediately after
the merger.
Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and Other Equity-Based
Awards
Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted
under the Holding option plan will be converted automatically at
the effective time of the merger into the right to receive an
amount in cash, if any, equal to (1) the difference between
(a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise
price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common
stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable
withholding of taxes.
Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted
under the EMJ incentive plan will be converted automatically at
the effective time of the merger into an option to purchase
Reliance common stock and will continue to be governed by the
terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related grant agreements
under which it was granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to the new
Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number
of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option
and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole
share; and |
76
|
|
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to
the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise
price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option
divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest
cent. |
The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange
ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in
the merger multiplied by two, to account for the fact that cash
consideration will not be paid.
Reliance has agreed to reserve additional shares of Reliance
common stock to satisfy its obligations under the EMJ retirement
savings plan and pursuant to the converted stock options and
other equity-based awards and to file a registration statement
with the SEC on an appropriate form to the extent necessary to
register Reliance common stock subject to the converted stock
options and other equity-based awards.
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
The merger will be effective at the time and date stated in the
certificate of merger that will be filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, the state of incorporation of
RSAC and EMJ. Under the merger agreement, the filing of the
certificate of merger and the closing of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will occur on the second
business day following the satisfaction or waiver of all
conditions to the merger, unless otherwise agreed to by the
parties.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates
Following the effective time of the merger, Computershare
Investor Services, the exchange/paying agent, will mail to each
record holder of EMJ common stock a transmittal letter that will
detail the procedures for record holders to exchange EMJ common
stock certificates for Reliance certificates and the cash
portion of the merger consideration, plus cash in lieu of any
fractional shares and any dividends to which you might be
entitled at that time. After the effective time of the merger,
transfers of EMJ common stock will not be registered on EMJ
stock transfer books.
Dividends
As a holder of EMJ common stock, you will be entitled to receive
dividends or other distributions on Reliance common stock with a
record date after the merger is completed, but only after you
have surrendered your EMJ stock certificates.
If there is any dividend or other distribution on Reliance
common stock with a record date after the merger, you will
receive the dividend or distribution promptly after the later of
the date that your Reliance shares are issued to you in exchange
for your EMJ certificates and the date the dividend or other
distribution is paid to all Reliance shareholders.
Representations and Warranties
Pursuant to the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance make certain
representations and warranties to each other about their
respective companies and businesses related to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate existence, qualification to conduct business and
corporate power of both themselves and their respective
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
capitalization and ownership of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
corporate authority to enter into, and carry out the obligations
of, the merger agreement, and the enforceability of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
absence of conflicts between the merger agreement and their
respective charter documents and bylaws, applicable law or
certain agreements; |
|
|
|
governmental consents and approvals required for completion of
the merger; |
77
|
|
|
|
|
financial statements and filings with the SEC, as well as
internal controls over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities and off-balance sheet
arrangements, as well as loans to officers and directors; |
|
|
|
absence of specified changes or events through the closing of
the merger; |
|
|
|
legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
|
|
|
insurance policies; |
|
|
|
properties and assets; |
|
|
|
employee benefit plans and labor matters; |
|
|
|
payment of fees to finders or brokers in connection with the
merger; |
|
|
|
tax matters; |
|
|
|
qualification of the merger as a reorganization
under the Code; |
|
|
|
information supplied for use in this proxy statement/ prospectus; |
|
|
|
intellectual property; and |
|
|
|
approval of its respective board of directors. |
EMJ also made representations and warranties to Reliance related
to:
|
|
|
|
|
the inapplicability to the merger of state anti-takeover laws; |
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from each of EMJs financial
advisors; and |
|
|
|
material contracts. |
Reliance also represented and warranted to EMJ that, at the time
of mailing this proxy statement/ prospectus, and at the
effective time of the merger, Reliance would have sufficient
funds to enable it to complete the merger.
The representations and warranties contained in the merger
agreement are subject to materiality and knowledge
qualifications in many respects, and do not survive the
effective time of the merger.
This description of the representations and warranties is
included to provide stockholders with information regarding the
terms of the merger agreement. It is not intended to provide any
other factual information about Reliance or EMJ. The assertions
embodied in the representations and warranties are qualified by
information in confidential disclosure letters that the parties
exchanged in connection with signing the merger agreement. The
disclosure letters contain information that modifies, qualifies
and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties.
Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and
warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts at
the time they were made or otherwise.
Operations Before Completion of the Merger
|
|
|
Restrictions on EMJs and Reliances Operations
Before Completion of the Merger |
In the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance have agreed to several
restrictions on their activities until either the completion of
the merger or the termination of the merger agreement. In
general, they are
78
required to conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary
course consistent with past practices, in substantially the same
manner as previously conducted, and to use their reasonable best
efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
keep available the services of their current officers and other
key employees; |
|
|
|
preserve intact their present lines of business and maintain
their rights and franchises; and |
|
|
|
preserve their relationships with customers, suppliers and
others having business dealings with them. |
|
|
|
Additional Restrictions on EMJs Operations Before
Completion of the Merger |
In addition, EMJ has generally agreed to restrictions that
prohibit it, or any of its subsidiaries, from:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring or committing to any capital expenditures, capital
additions or capital improvements, other than those in the
ordinary course of business or as contemplated by EMJs
fiscal 2006 and 2007 capital budgets and in any event not in
excess of $5 million in the aggregate, except as provided
for in such budgets; |
|
|
|
declaring, setting aside or paying dividends other than
intracompany dividends; |
|
|
|
splitting, combining or reclassifying its capital stock; |
|
|
|
repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock
or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of
its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock,
voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions
related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise of
EMJ stock options or other stock-based awards; |
|
|
|
amending EMJs charter documents; |
|
|
|
making any material acquisitions, other than acquisitions of
assets used in the operations of EMJ in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, divesting or disposing of assets
(including the capital stock of its subsidiaries), businesses or
divisions, other than transactions that do not have a fair
value, individually, in excess of $3 million or, in the
aggregate, in excess of $10 million in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
incurring liens other than pursuant to specified debt agreements
or incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice; |
|
|
|
paying or committing to pay any material severance or
termination pay not existing as of January 17, 2006;
entering into any material employment, deferred compensation,
consulting, severance or similar agreement not existing as of
January 17, 2006; or increasing in any material respect any
employee benefits payable to any director, officer or key
employee except pursuant to an agreement existing as of
January 17, 2006; |
|
|
|
adopting any additional employee benefit plan or making any
material amendment to an employee benefit plan; |
|
|
|
making any material contribution to any employee benefit plan
other than regularly scheduled contributions or those required
by law or agreement; |
|
|
|
entering into any agreement that limits or restricts the right
of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries to engage or compete in any
business or in any geographic area or location; |
|
|
|
changing in any material respect its accounting methods, except
as may be required by a governmental authority or by changes in
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
changing its fiscal year, preparing or filing any material tax
return materially inconsistent with past practice or, on such
tax return, taking any position or making any tax election or
adopting any |
79
|
|
|
|
|
method that is materially inconsistent with positions taken,
elections made or methods used in preparing or filing similar
tax returns, or settling or compromising any liability for
taxes; and |
|
|
|
agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any
of the foregoing. |
|
|
|
Additional Restrictions on Reliances Operations
Before Completion of the Merger |
Reliance has agreed to restrictions that prohibit it from:
|
|
|
|
|
repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock
or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of
its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock,
voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions
related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise or
grant of Reliance stock options or other stock-based awards or
intracompany issuances of capital stock; |
|
|
|
amending Reliances charter documents; |
|
|
|
altering the corporate structure of Reliance or any of its
subsidiaries where such change is reasonably likely to result in
a material adverse effect to Reliance or would adversely affect
the value of Reliances common stock; or |
|
|
|
agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any
of the foregoing. |
No Solicitation
EMJ agreed in the merger agreement that it will neither, nor
will it authorize or permit any of its subsidiaries, officers,
directors, employees, agents, representatives or affiliates to,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or
facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public
information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
furnish, or provide access to, any information or data to, or
have or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, any
person relating to a takeover proposal. |
A takeover proposal means any proposal or offer
relating to or a transaction to effect:
|
|
|
|
|
a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires
or would acquire more than 19% of (1) the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the
outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new
class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a
class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from
EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise; |
|
|
|
a merger, share exchange, consolidation or other business
combination involving EMJ (other than the merger); |
|
|
|
any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would
acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the
outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the
entity surviving any merger or business combination including
any of EMJs subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJs
subsidiaries representing more than 25% of the fair market value
of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction; and |
|
|
|
any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization
or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
as a result of which (a) the holders of shares of EMJ
immediately prior to such transactions do not, in the aggregate,
own at least 81% of the outstanding shares of common stock and
the outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting
entity in such transaction immediately after the consummation of
such transaction in substantially the same |
80
|
|
|
|
|
proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or
(b) the individuals comprising EMJs board of
directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority
of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such
transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the
consummation of such transaction. |
A superior proposal is any bona fide, unsolicited
takeover proposal made by a third party that is not subject to a
financing condition, other than one similar to the financing
condition in the merger agreement, and is on terms that
EMJs board of directors determines in good faith, after
consultation with EMJs outside legal counsel and financial
advisors, to be more favorable to EMJs stockholders, from
a financial point of view, than the merger described in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Furthermore, a superior proposal
varies from a takeover proposal in that it means any proposal or
offer relating to or a transaction to effect:
|
|
|
|
|
a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires
or would acquire more than 50% of (1) the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the
outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new
class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a
class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from
EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise; |
|
|
|
any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would
acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the
outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the
entity surviving any merger or business combination including
any of EMJs subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJs
subsidiaries representing more than 50% of the fair market value
of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction; or |
|
|
|
any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization
or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
as a result of which (1) the holders of shares of EMJ
common stock immediately prior to such transactions do not, in
the aggregate, own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of
common stock and the outstanding voting power of the surviving
or resulting entity in such transaction immediately after the
consummation of such transaction in substantially the same
proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or
(2) the individuals comprising EMJs board of
directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority
of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such
transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the
consummation of such transaction. |
Prior to the special meeting, EMJ may, in response to an
unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal by a third party
and after giving prompt written notice to Reliance, furnish
information to, pursuant to a confidentiality agreement no less
restrictive than the one with Reliance, and participate in
discussions or negotiations with, such third party regarding a
takeover proposal if EMJs board of directors determines in
good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal counsel
and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal constitutes or
is reasonably likely to constitute a superior proposal.
EMJs board of directors may not withdraw (or modify in a
manner adverse to Reliance) its approval or recommendation of
the merger agreement or the merger or approve, adopt or
recommend any takeover proposal or enter into an agreement
constituting or related to a takeover proposal, unless
(1) following the receipt of an unsolicited takeover
proposal EMJs board of directors determines in good faith
after receiving the advice of a financial advisor and its
outside counsel that such takeover proposal is a superior
proposal, or EMJs board of directors determines in good
faith after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and
financial advisors that there is a reasonable probability that
failure to take such action would result in the board breaching
its fiduciary duties; (2) EMJ provides four business
days prior written notice to Reliance of such action; and
(3) after such notice, EMJs board of directors
determines that the takeover proposal still constitutes a
superior proposal. EMJ has agreed to provide Reliance with prompt
81
notice of any inquiry EMJ reasonably believes could lead to a
takeover proposal and the terms of such inquiry and the identity
of the person making such inquiry and to keep Reliance fully
informed of the status and details of any such inquiry.
Additionally, EMJs board of directors is not prohibited
from taking and disclosing to EMJs stockholders a position
contemplated by
Rules 14d-9 or
14e-2(a) or
Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A promulgated under the
Exchange Act in response to an unsolicited superior proposal.
For purposes of the foregoing, any violation of the restrictions
described in this portion of the merger agreement summary by any
director, officer or employee of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney,
accountant or other advisor, agent or representative of EMJ is
deemed to be a breach of the relevant restriction by EMJ.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
|
|
|
Termination by Reliance or EMJ |
Either of our respective boards of directors may terminate the
merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to
completion of the merger, whether or not it has been approved by
the EMJ stockholders, if:
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance and EMJ agree to terminate by mutual written consent; |
|
|
|
the merger has not been completed on or before June 2,
2006, except that a party may not terminate the merger agreement
if that partys willful and material breach of the merger
agreement is the primary cause of the merger not being completed
by that date; |
|
|
|
a court or another governmental authority has issued a final and
nonappealable order, decree or ruling or taken other action
permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
merger; |
|
|
|
a governmental authority has failed to grant or issue a consent,
permit, order or authorization required to consummate the merger; |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors determines to accept a superior
proposal; or |
|
|
|
EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement at the
special meeting. |
In addition, Reliances board of directors may terminate
the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to
completion of the merger if:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies
its recommendation; |
|
|
|
EMJ breaches its representations, warranties or covenants
contained in the merger agreement so that any conditions to
closing are not capable of being satisfied and cannot or have
not been cured within 30 days after written notice to
Reliance of such breach; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors recommends to EMJ stockholders
that they approve a takeover proposal other than the merger. |
EMJs board of directors may terminate the merger agreement
and abandon the merger at any time prior to completion of the
merger if Reliance breaches its representations, warranties or
covenants contained in the merger agreement so that the
conditions to closing are not capable of being satisfied and
cannot or have not been cured within 30 days after written
notice to EMJ of such breach.
82
|
|
|
Termination Fee to be Paid by EMJ |
EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors withdrawing or adversely modifying
its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the merger
agreement and the merger or recommending a takeover proposal
other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors accepting a superior proposal. |
Additional Covenants
In addition to the covenants relating to the conduct of the
parties businesses before completion of the merger, each
of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to perform additional specified
covenants. The principal additional covenants are as follows:
EMJ has agreed to hold a special meeting of its stockholders to
consider and vote upon adoption of the merger agreement and to
use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of EMJ
stockholders.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to cooperate fully with each
other in connection with the making of all filings and responses
as may be required under the HSR Act.
Upon reasonable notice, each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to,
and has agreed to cause each of its respective significant
subsidiaries to, afford to the other party and to the officers,
employees, accountants, legal counsel, financial advisors and
other representatives of the other party, reasonable access
during normal business hours during the period prior to the
completion of the merger to all of their respective properties,
books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records, and each
of Reliance and EMJ has the right to access the properties,
books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records of any
non-significant subsidiary of the other party to the extent that
the operations or business of any such subsidiary would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect upon
such other party.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to use its commercially
reasonable efforts to take all actions and do all things
necessary or advisable under the merger agreement or applicable
law to complete the merger. This cooperation may include
contesting and resisting any action or proceeding challenging
the merger.
RSAC has agreed to assume all obligations of EMJ with respect to
its retirement savings plan and Reliance has agreed to guarantee
RSACs performance under such plan to make an additional
employer contribution to this plan in a number of shares of
Reliance common stock at least equal to the number of shares of
EMJ common stock that would have been contributed for this year
if the merger had not occurred multiplied by the exchange ratio
multiplied by two. Prior to the completion of the merger,
Reliance has agreed to reserve for issuance the number of shares
of Reliance common stock necessary to satisfy Reliances
obligations with respect to EMJs retirement savings plan.
Reliance also has agreed to file, promptly after the completion
of the merger, a registration statement with the SEC on an
appropriate form to the extent necessary to register Reliance
common stock to be issued or issuable pursuant to the EMJ
retirement savings plan as long as this plan has an investment
option to allow for Reliance common
83
stock, which option must be continued for no less than one year
from the date of the completion of the merger.
RSAC has also agreed, and Reliance has agreed to cause RSAC to,
maintain EMJs existing employee benefit plans for no less
than one year from the date of the closing of the merger, or to
provide benefits that are at least as favorable to EMJ employees
as in effect on the date of the merger agreement, subject to any
applicable collective bargaining agreements.
Reliance has also agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, to
(1) subject to the limitations proscribed by
Section 280G of the Code, honor all of EMJs existing
employment, change of control, severance and termination
agreements, plans and policies in effect as of the date the
merger agreement was executed and (2) amend any of these
plans or arrangements, if necessary, so as to avoid liability
under Section 409A of the Code.
Reliance has agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, for one year
after the completion of the merger, to provide annual rates of
base salary or hourly wages, as applicable, and annual incentive
opportunities to EMJ employees who do not have an employment,
change of control, severance or termination agreement with EMJ,
where such benefits are at least as favorable in the aggregate
to these EMJ employees as in effect on the date of the merger
agreement.
For all purposes of determining eligibility to participate and
vesting and for purposes of benefit accrual, Reliance has also
agreed to credit each EMJ employee for his or her years of
service with EMJ and its subsidiaries before the completion of
the merger to the same extent such EMJ employee was entitled,
before the merger, to credit for that service under any similar
EMJ benefit plan, except to the extent that such credit would
result in a duplication of benefits or for credit for benefit
accrual purposes under any defined benefit plan.
|
|
|
Insurance and Indemnification |
Reliance has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and
provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present
directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries
for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a
period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed to
cause RSACs certificate of incorporation and bylaws to
contain provisions regarding exculpation, indemnification and
advancement of expenses for officers, directors and employees
that overall are no less generous than those included in the
current EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor
all of EMJs obligations to indemnify all officers,
directors and employees for acts and omissions by such persons
prior to the completion of the merger to the extent such
obligations existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations
survive the effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in
full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the
relevant document until the expiration of the applicable statute
of limitations. For a period of six years after the merger,
Reliance has agreed to maintain the current policies of
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary liability insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to
claims arising from or related to facts or events that occurred
prior to the merger and with a total insured coverage of
$50 million of directors and officers liability
insurance and $5 million of fiduciary liability insurance;
provided that, if the annual insurance premium payments for both
insured coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will
obtain a policy with the most advantageous terms available for
the maximum premium amount.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to take all required steps
to exempt any dispositions of EMJ common stock or acquisitions
of Reliance shares in connection with the merger from the
SECs short-swing profit rules.
84
Reliance will cause (1) the Reliance shares to be issued in
the merger to be approved for listing on the New York Stock
Exchange and (2) the EMJ common stock to be delisted from
the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the Exchange
Act.
EMJ will use reasonable efforts to cause each of its affiliates
to enter into a written agreement providing that they will not
offer or sell any of the Reliance shares issued to them in the
merger in violation of the Securities Act or the related SEC
rules.
Conditions to Closing
Each of the respective obligations of EMJ and Reliance to
complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
various conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by EMJ stockholders; |
|
|
|
the absence of any law, order, injunction or legal restraint
prohibiting completion of the merger; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period
under the HSR Act; |
|
|
|
the receipt of all other governmental agency consents,
approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to
complete the merger other than those that the failure to make or
obtain would not render the merger illegal; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of any stop order issued by the SEC suspending the
effectiveness of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the
absence of any proceedings initiated or threatened by the SEC
for that purpose; |
|
|
|
the truth and correctness of the other partys
representation and warranties as of the date of the completion
of the merger, except where the failure of such representations
and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse
effect, and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer
of the other party to that effect; |
|
|
|
the other party having performed or complied with its agreements
and covenants in the merger agreement in all material respects,
and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer of the
other party to that effect; |
|
|
|
the absence of any pending or threatened litigation with a
reasonable likelihood of success (1) challenging the merger
or seeking to obtain damages that are material to EMJ;
(2) seeking to limit in any material way the ownership or
operation by EMJ, Reliance or any of their respective
subsidiaries of any material portion of the business or assets
of such entities, or to compel such entities to dispose of or
hold separate a material portion of their business or assets as
a result of the merger; (3) seeking to impose limitations
on Reliances ownership and/or voting rights of EMJs
common stock; or (4) seeking to prohibit Reliances
control in any material respect of EMJs business or
operations; |
|
|
|
the absence of any material adverse effect on the other
party; and |
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from the partys counsel that the
merger will constitute a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. |
85
Amendments, Extensions and Waivers
Reliance and EMJ may amend the merger agreement at any time to
the extent legally permissible prior to completion of the
merger; provided, however, after the EMJ stockholders approve
the merger agreement, no amendment may be made that requires
further approval by stockholders under applicable law or the
rules of any relevant stock exchange. All amendments to the
merger agreement must be in writing signed by each party.
At any time prior to completion of the merger, any party to the
merger agreement may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party to the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of
the other party contained in the merger agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
waive compliance by the other party with any of the agreements
or conditions contained in the merger agreement. |
All extensions and waivers must be in writing and signed by the
party against whom the waiver is to be effective.
Each of Reliance and EMJ will pay its own costs and expenses
incurred as a result of the merger and the merger agreement.
Reliance and EMJ will share equally in connection with any
filings required under the HSR Act. Reliance will be solely
responsible for the costs associated with the printing and
mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the expenses
incurred in filing this proxy statement/ prospectus with the SEC.
86
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
General
The following is a summary of the material United States federal
income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to apply
generally to a U.S. holder of EMJ common stock that
surrenders all of its common stock for shares of Reliance common
stock and cash in the merger. The summary is based on the Code,
United States Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder,
administrative rulings and court decisions in effect as of the
date hereof, all of which are subject to change or differing
interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). The
consequences summarized below are based upon representation
letters from each of Reliance, EMJ and RSAC, which will be
reconfirmed prior to the merger.
For purposes of this summary, the term
U.S. holder means:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized
under the laws of the United States or of any state or the
District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) was in existence on August 20,
1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable
Treasury regulations to continue to be treated as a United
States person; or |
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source. |
If a partnership holds EMJ common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner of such partnership will generally depend on the status
of the partners and the activities of the partnership. A
U.S. holder that is a partner in a partnership which holds
EMJ common stock should consult its tax advisor.
This summary only addresses EMJ stockholders that hold their
shares of EMJ common stock as a capital asset within the meaning
of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this summary does not
address all aspects of United States federal taxation that may
be relevant to an EMJ stockholder in light of such holders
particular circumstances or that may be applicable to holders
subject to special treatment under United States federal income
tax laws (including, for example, tax-exempt organizations,
dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance
companies, financial institutions or persons that hold their EMJ
common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or
conversion transaction, holders subject to the alternative
minimum tax provisions of the Code, holders whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise
appraisal rights, or holders who acquired their EMJ common stock
through the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as
compensation).
In addition, the following summary does not address the tax
consequences of the merger under state, local and non-United
States laws. Furthermore, the following summary does not address
any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after
or at the same time as the merger, whether or not they are in
connection with the merger, including, without limitation,
transactions in which EMJ shares are acquired or Reliance shares
are disposed of; |
|
|
|
the tax consequences to holders of options issued by EMJ or
Reliance which are assumed, replaced, exercised or converted, as
the case may be, in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
the tax consequences of the receipt of Reliance shares other
than in exchange for EMJ shares; or |
|
|
|
tax implications of a failure of the merger to qualify as a
reorganization. |
No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. No
assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax
consequences summarized below.
87
HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING
THE EFFECTS OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN
AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal income
tax purposes. It is a condition to EMJs and
Reliances obligations to consummate the merger that each
of them receive an opinion from their respective tax counsel,
dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that
the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization qualifying under the provisions of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Reliance and EMJ expect to be
able to obtain the tax opinions if, as expected, Reliance, EMJ
and RSAC are able to deliver customary representations to their
respective tax counsel, and there is no adverse change in
U.S. federal income tax law.
If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the
opinions are based is inconsistent with the actual facts
relating to the merger, the tax consequences of the merger could
be adversely affected. The determination by tax counsel as to
whether the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code will depend upon the facts and
law existing at the effective time of the merger. EMJ
stockholders should be aware that the tax opinions discussed in
this section are not binding on the IRS, the IRS could adopt a
contrary position and a contrary position could be sustained by
a court.
Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, EMJ, Reliance and
RSAC will each be a party to the reorganization, and none of
EMJ, Reliance and RSAC will recognize any gain or loss solely as
a result of the merger. Additionally, the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders of EMJ common stock are, in general, as
follows:
Exchange of EMJ Common Stock for Reliance Common Stock and
Cash
An EMJ stockholder that receives a combination of Reliance
common stock and cash in exchange for all of its shares of EMJ
common stock will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount
equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the amount of cash
and the fair market value of the Reliance common stock received
in the merger minus the stockholders aggregate tax basis
in its EMJ common stock surrendered therefor and (2) the
amount of cash the stockholder receives in the merger.
Any gain recognized will be capital gain unless the EMJ
stockholders receipt of cash has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be
treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of the
holders ratable share of Reliances accumulated
earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. For purposes of determining whether an EMJ
stockholders receipt of cash has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend, the EMJ stockholder will be treated
as if it first exchanged all of its EMJ common stock solely in
exchange for Reliance common stock and then Reliance immediately
redeemed a portion of that stock for the cash that the holder
actually received in the merger. Receipt of cash will generally
not have the effect of a distribution of a dividend to the EMJ
stockholder if such receipt is, with respect to the EMJ
stockholder, not essentially equivalent to a
dividend or substantially disproportionate,
each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. The
IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest
of a minority shareholder that owns a small number of shares in
a publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no
control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as
opposed to dividend) treatment under these rules. However, in
determining the interest of a shareholder in Reliance for
purposes of these rules, certain constructive ownership rules
must be taken into account. Any capital gain will be long-term
if the EMJ stockholders holding period for its EMJ common
stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
An EMJ stockholders aggregate tax basis in the Reliance
common stock received in the merger (including any fractional
shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will be equal to
the stockholders aggregate tax basis in its EMJ common
stock, decreased by the amount of any cash received and
increased by the amount of any gain recognized. An EMJ
stockholders holding period for Reliance
88
common stock received in the merger (including any fractional
shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will include the
holding period of the EMJ common stock surrendered in the merger.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares
A holder of EMJ common stock who receives cash in lieu of a
fractional share of Reliance common stock generally will be
treated as having received such fractional share in the merger
and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional
share. Gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the
difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of the
fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional
share of Reliance common stock. Subject to the discussion above
regarding possible dividend treatment, such gain or loss
generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the
effective date of the merger, the holding period for such shares
is greater than one year.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, an EMJ stockholder receiving cash in the merger will
be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition,
backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%) will
generally apply to cash payments if the exchanging EMJ
stockholder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification
number or fails to properly certify that it is not subject to
backup withholding (generally on an IRS
Form W-9). Certain
holders (including, among others, U.S. corporations) are
not subject to information reporting or backup withholding, but
they may still need to furnish an IRS
Form W-9 or
otherwise establish an exemption. Any amount withheld as backup
withholding from payments to an exchanging EMJ stockholder will
be creditable against the EMJ stockholders federal income
tax liability, provided that it timely furnishes the required
information to the IRS. EMJ stockholders should consult their
tax advisors as to their qualifications for exemption from
backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining an exemption.
The preceding discussion is intended only as a summary of
certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger
and does not purport to be a complete analysis or discussion of
all of the mergers potential tax effects. EMJ stockholders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific
tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax return
reporting requirements, and the applicability and effect of
federal, state, local and other applicable tax laws.
89
THE VOTING AGREEMENT
The following description, which sets forth the material
provisions of the voting agreement under which the Kelso Funds
have, among other things, agreed to vote in favor of the merger
and the merger agreement, is subject to the full text of, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the voting agreement,
which is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Annex B and which is incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read the voting
agreement carefully and in its entirety.
Reliance has entered into a voting agreement with each of the
Kelso Funds pursuant to which each Kelso Fund has agreed, among
other things, to vote all of their shares of EMJ common stock,
including shares of EMJ common stock acquired after the date and
during the term of the voting agreement, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement,
the merger and each of the other actions contemplated by the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
against approval of any takeover proposal; and |
|
|
|
against any of the following actions (other than those actions
that relate to the merger): (1) any amendment of EMJs
charter documents, (2) any other action that is designed to
or would impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or materially
adversely affect the merger or any other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement or (3) any change in
any form or manner of the voting rights of any class of capital
stock of EMJ. |
The voting agreement terminates upon the earliest to occur of
(1) the termination of the merger agreement, (2) the
effective time of the merger, (3) EMJs board of
directors withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation
of the merger and (4) upon notice by any Kelso Fund and
after any amendment or modification of the merger agreement that
extends the outside date or otherwise materially and adversely
affects such Kelso Fund in its capacity as a stockholder of EMJ.
The voting agreement prohibits each of the Kelso Funds from
selling or disposing of any shares or options to acquire shares
of EMJ common stock beneficially owned by these entities, except
for transfers to its general or limited partners and only if
such partner agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of
the voting agreement.
Except as provided by the merger agreement and applicable law,
and except in connection with the exercise of the fiduciary
duties of an affiliate of the Kelso Funds as a director of EMJ,
each of the Kelso Funds, solely in its capacity as an EMJ
stockholder and not in any other capacity, has agreed that
neither it nor any of its officers, directors, employees,
advisors, agents, partners or other representatives will,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, negotiate, solicit, encourage or provide confidential
information to facilitate the submission of any takeover
proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take
any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of
any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any takeover proposal. |
In addition, each of the Kelso Funds has agreed to immediately
cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations
between such entity and any person that may be ongoing with
respect to any takeover proposal.
At the close of business on January 17, 2006, the date of
the merger agreement, the Kelso Funds owned
25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock, representing
approximately 50.1% of the shares of EMJ common stock
outstanding on that date. As of the record date for EMJs
special meeting, the Kelso Funds owned 25,174,634 shares of
EMJ common stock, representing approximately 50.1% of the shares
of EMJ common stock outstanding on that date.
90
INFORMATION ABOUT RELIANCE
General
Reliance is one of the five largest metals service center
companies in the United States. Reliances network of 24
divisions, 21 operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company
operates more than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium
and South Korea. Through this network, Reliance provides metals
processing services and distributes a full line of more than
90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper,
carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel
products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of
industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington
and Wisconsin. One of Reliances subsidiaries has a
location in South Korea that serves the Asian semiconductor
market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service center in
Belgium in January 2003 to service the European aerospace
market. In addition, Reliance, through its 70%-owned company,
has entered into an agreement to acquire a facility in the
Peoples Republic of China.
Reliance shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol RS. Reliances principal executive
offices are located at 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100,
Los Angeles, California 90071, and its telephone number is
(213) 687-7700 and its Website is located at
http://www.rsac.com. Information contained on Reliances
Website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
Certain information relating to executive compensation, various
Reliance benefit plans (including Reliances stock option
plans), voting securities, including information regarding the
principal holders of those securities, certain relationships and
related transactions and other matters regarding Reliance is
incorporated by reference or set forth in Reliances Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Note that among
the documents incorporated by reference will be Reliances
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which is expected to be
available on the SECs and Reliances Websites on
March 15, 2006. EMJ stockholders desiring copies of the
Reliance Annual Report on
Form 10-K and the
other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus may contact Reliance at its address or
telephone number indicated under Where You Can Find More
Information on page 116.
91
INFORMATION ABOUT EMJ
General
EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of
Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined
two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and
Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company,
founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these
two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holding.
On April 20, 2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial
restructuring, pursuant to which Holding was merged with and
into a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ. EMJ also closed its
initial public offering on April 20, 2005.
EMJ is a leading distributor of specialty metal bar and tubular
products used by North American manufacturing companies and has
been in business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over
25,000 different metal products in large quantities from primary
producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless
steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells
these metal products in smaller quantities to over 35,000
customers spanning various industries, including machine tools,
industrial equipment, transportation, fluid power, oil, gas and
energy, fabricated metal, and construction and agricultural
equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of metal products and
provides its customers value-added metal processing and
inventory management services from its distribution network of
39 strategically located service and processing centers in the
United States and Canada.
EMJs metal processing services consist of cutting to
length, burning, sawing, honing, shearing, grinding, polishing
and performing other similar services on most of the metal
products it sells, all to customer specifications. As part of
EMJs inventory management services, EMJ schedules
deliveries in the quantities and at the times required by
just-in-time
manufacturing processes employed by a growing number of leading
manufacturing companies and provides its customers with an
on-time product delivery guarantee.
EMJ shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol JOR. The principal executive offices of EMJ
are located at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California 90262,
and its telephone number is (323) 567-1122 and its Website
is located at http://www.emjmetals.com. Information contained on
EMJs Website is not incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
Certain information relating to executive compensation, various
EMJ benefit plans (including EMJs stock option plans),
voting securities, including information regarding the principal
holders of those securities, certain relationships and related
transactions and other matters regarding EMJ is incorporated by
reference or set forth in EMJs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2005, which is incorporated in this
proxy statement/ prospectus by reference. EMJ stockholders
desiring copies of EMJs Annual Report on
Form 10-K and the
other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus may contact EMJ at its address or
telephone number indicated under Where You Can Find More
Information on page 116.
92
RELIANCE
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements
combine the historical consolidated balance sheets and
statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the
merger using the purchase method of accounting. Certain
historical balance sheet and income statement amounts of EMJ
have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement
presentation of Reliance.
We are providing the following information to aid you in your
analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The balance
sheet information as of September 30, 2005 and the income
statement information for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 were derived from the unaudited
financial statements of Reliance and EMJ. The income statement
information for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
derived from the audited financial statements of Reliance and
the unaudited quarterly financial statements of EMJ. The
information should be read together with our historical
financial statements and related notes contained in the annual
reports and other information that we have filed with the SEC
and incorporated herein by reference. See Where You Can
Find More Information.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2005 gives effect to the merger as if it had
occurred on September 30, 2005. The unaudited pro forma
combined statements of income assume the merger was effected on
January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2004 for the pro forma
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
the 12 months ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
Other than a difference in accounting for stock-based
compensation reflected in the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements, and the difference in the fiscal
year-ends, the accounting policies of Reliance and EMJ are
substantially comparable.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for
illustrative purposes only and is based on available information
and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable as of the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The financial results
may have been different had the companies always been combined
due to, among other factors, those factors discussed under the
section entitled Risk Factors on page 30. You
should not rely on the pro forma combined financial information
as being indicative of the historical results that would have
been achieved had the companies always been combined or the
future results that Reliance will experience. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements on page 28.
93
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
10,419 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,087 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
394,326 |
|
|
|
180,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,209 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
367,112 |
|
|
|
251,467 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
(a) |
|
|
703,079 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets
|
|
|
17,631 |
|
|
|
11,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,262 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
24,573 |
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
814,061 |
|
|
|
483,449 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
1,382,010 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
470,924 |
|
|
|
124,581 |
|
|
|
239,523 |
(b) |
|
|
835,028 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
404,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,701 |
(c) |
|
|
811,165 |
|
Net cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
Other assets (including intangibles)
|
|
|
38,767 |
|
|
|
9,288 |
|
|
|
59,881 |
(d) |
|
|
107,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,728,216 |
|
|
$ |
667,827 |
|
|
$ |
790,605 |
|
|
$ |
3,186,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
159,575 |
|
|
$ |
157,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
316,850 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
22,784 |
|
|
|
39,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,295 |
|
Accrued compensation and retirement costs
|
|
|
47,255 |
|
|
|
30,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,954 |
|
Accrued insurance costs
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations
|
|
|
49,164 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
303,607 |
|
|
|
230,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,314 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
365,275 |
|
|
|
295,516 |
|
|
|
412,964 |
(e) |
|
|
1,073,755 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16,030 |
|
|
|
13,656 |
|
|
|
4,145 |
(f) |
|
|
33,831 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
55,613 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
140,800 |
(g) |
|
|
199,058 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
14,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,648 |
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity
|
|
|
321,947 |
|
|
|
360,466 |
|
|
|
(2,467 |
) (h) |
|
|
679,946 |
|
Retained earnings (losses)
|
|
|
645,905 |
|
|
|
(234,261 |
) |
|
|
234,261 |
(h) |
|
|
645,905 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
902 |
(h) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
967,501 |
|
|
|
125,303 |
|
|
|
232,696 |
|
|
|
1,325,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,728,216 |
|
|
$ |
667,827 |
|
|
$ |
790,605 |
|
|
$ |
3,186,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(a) Inventories Represents the pro forma
adjustment to record inventories at fair market value based on
preliminary estimates.
(b) Property, Plant, &
Equipment Represents the pro forma adjustment to
record the estimated fair values of real and personal property
based upon preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are
subject to adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(c) Goodwill The merger agreement
estimated the purchase price to be $13.00 per share for EMJ
common stock, payable approximately half in cash and half in
Reliance common stock. We have used a valuation of $13.62 per
share because the actual closing price of Reliance common stock
for the 20-day period
ending on, and including, February 22, 2006, exceeded the
upper limit established in the merger agreement for purposes of
calculating the exchange ratio. Each EMJ shareholder will
receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a Reliance share, for
each share of EMJ common stock. The value of Reliance common
stock issued for the purpose of the pro forma purchase price
allocation assumes a Reliance average price of $79.89, resulting
in 0.0892 of a Reliance share issued for each EMJ share.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price is
allocated to EMJs net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values as of September 30, 2005. The fair values
assigned to these assets and liabilities is preliminary and is
subject to change pending the completion of third-party fair
value appraisals as well as pending any additional information
that may come to our knowledge potentially impacting the fair
values of those assets and liabilities. The purchase price of
approximately $724.1 million, which includes the equity
value of the outstanding shares, the cash out of the Holding
options and the Reliance acquisition costs, was allocated to
EMJs assets and liabilities on a fair value basis and
resulted in estimated goodwill of approximately
$406.7 million.
(d) Other assets/ Identifiable intangible
assets Represents the pro forma adjustments to
record the estimated fair values of identifiable intangible
assets relating to tradenames, certain customer relationships or
other intangible assets from the acquisition based upon
preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are subject to
adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(e) Debt Represents the pro forma
adjustment for incremental borrowings on Reliances
existing line of credit to finance the cash portion of the total
purchase price consideration, the adjustment to record
EMJs senior secured notes at estimated fair market value,
and to reflect additional EMJ borrowings for their share of the
merger related costs. The final debt fair value determination
will be based on prevailing market interest rates at the
completion of the acquisition and the necessary adjustment will
be amortized as a reduction (in the case of a premium to book
value) or an increase (in the case of a discount to book value)
to interest expense over the remaining life of the individual
debt issues.
(f) Other long-term liabilities/ Pension and
Postretirement Benefit Obligations Represents
the pro forma adjustments to record pension and postretirement
benefit obligations at fair value, based upon actuarial reports
dated March 31, 2005. The final value determination of the
pension and postretirement benefit obligations may differ from
these estimates due to potential changes in discount rates and
the rate of return on plan assets up to the date of completion
of the merger.
(g) Deferred Income Taxes The deferred
tax liability represents the pro forma adjustment for the
additional book/tax differences created from the allocation of
purchase price to the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed. These estimates are based on the estimated
prospective statutory tax rate of 40% for the combined company
and could change based on changes in the applicable tax rates
and finalization of the combined companys tax position.
(h) Shareholders Equity/ Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss Represents pro forma
adjustments to eliminate the historical shareholders
equity of EMJ and the issuance of 4,481,148 shares of
Reliance common stock in connection with the acquisition. This
assumes 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding
and an average closing price of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period of $79.89 per share.
95
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,498,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,313,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,811,562 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147 |
(b) |
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,501,082 |
|
|
|
1,313,189 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
3,815,418 |
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
1,831,474 |
|
|
|
993,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,824,965 |
|
|
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
375,613 |
|
|
|
191,912 |
(a) |
|
|
18,790 |
(b) |
|
|
586,315 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
8,283 |
|
|
|
16,467 |
(c) |
|
|
59,556 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19,290 |
|
|
|
41,272 |
|
|
|
(8,532 |
) (b),(d) |
|
|
52,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,261,183 |
|
|
|
1,234,958 |
|
|
|
26,725 |
|
|
|
3,522,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
239,899 |
|
|
|
78,231 |
|
|
|
(25,578 |
) |
|
|
292,552 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
233,628 |
|
|
|
78,231 |
|
|
|
(25,578 |
) |
|
|
286,281 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
88,779 |
|
|
|
(22,658 |
) |
|
|
42,666 |
(e) |
|
|
108,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
144,849 |
|
|
|
100,889 |
|
|
|
(68,244 |
) |
|
|
177,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
144,849 |
|
|
$ |
100,889 |
|
|
$ |
(68,244 |
) |
|
$ |
177,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
33,062,949 |
|
|
|
39,529,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,544,097 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,888,726 |
|
|
|
36,951,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,369,874 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,943,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,474,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,417,689 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,536 |
) (b) |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947,202 |
|
|
|
1,474,655 |
|
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
4,418,321 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
2,110,848 |
|
|
|
1,064,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,175,455 |
|
|
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
483,887 |
|
|
|
270,174 |
(a) |
|
|
18,238 |
(b) |
|
|
772,299 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,627 |
|
|
|
11,576 |
|
|
|
21,956 |
(c) |
|
|
78,159 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,690 |
|
|
|
88,319 |
|
|
|
(48,744 |
) (b),(d) |
|
|
68,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,668,052 |
|
|
|
1,434,676 |
|
|
|
(8,550 |
) |
|
|
4,094,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
279,150 |
|
|
|
39,979 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
324,143 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(9,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
269,968 |
|
|
|
39,979 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
314,961 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
100,240 |
|
|
|
5,391 |
|
|
|
14,054 |
(e) |
|
|
119,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
169,728 |
|
|
|
34,588 |
|
|
|
(9,040 |
) |
|
|
195,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
169,728 |
|
|
$ |
26,408 |
|
|
$ |
(9,040 |
) |
|
$ |
187,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
32,675,379 |
|
|
|
15,542,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,156,527 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.06 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,480,101 |
|
|
|
11,489,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,961,249 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(a) EMJ Non-recurring expenses Includes
various non-recurring expenses of EMJ related to special bonuses
to management, contributions to the retirement savings plan,
certain advisory fees, and stock-based compensation expense in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. The total for such non-recurring
expenses was approximately $13,800,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and $28,804,000 for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004. Excluding these one-time charges
would result in combined pro forma earnings per diluted
share of $4.96 for the nine months ended September 30,
2005, and $5.51 for the twelve months ended December 31,
2004.
(b) Reclassifications The adjustments
reflect reclassifications related to EMJs COLI policies to
reflect the net impact of these items on the income statement in
Other income, net, to conform to Reliances income
statement presentation. The adjustments include a
reclassification of the income earned on the policy dividend
growth and death benefits less policy premiums of the COLI
policies from Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and
administrative expense to Other income, net.
In addition, the interest expense on the loans outstanding
against the COLI policies cash surrender values was reclassified
from Interest expense to Other income, net. The following
summarizes the net impact of the COLI income and expense related
adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Twelve | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Increase in S,G,&A expenses
|
|
$ |
18,790 |
|
|
$ |
18,238 |
|
Decrease in Interest expense
|
|
|
(17,643 |
) |
|
|
(21,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in Other income, net
|
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
$ |
(3,536 |
) |
(c) Depreciation and Amortization
Expense To reflect the pro forma effect on
depreciation and amortization expense of the
write-up of property,
plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets to their
estimated fair market values at the date of the acquisition. The
amount of this adjustment may change as the values of the
underlying asset third-party valuations are finalized.
(d) Interest Expense Represents the pro
forma adjustment to interest expense from the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on the borrowings to fund the cash portion of
the acquisition and related transaction costs of Reliance and
EMJ of $12,094,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and $11,900,000 for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004. The weighted average interest rate under
Reliances revolving line of credit in effect during the
respective periods was applied to the total borrowings made on
the line of credit. |
|
|
|
Amortization of the debt premium from the fair market value
adjustment as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining
life of EMJs outstanding
93/4%
notes resulting from the fair valuation of the
93/4%
notes which amounted to $2,983,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and $3,977,000 for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004. The final fair value determination
of the debt will be based on prevailing market interest rates at
the completion of the acquisition and the necessary adjustment
will be amortized as a reduction (in the case of a premium to
book value) or an increase (in the case of a discount to book
value) to interest expense over the remaining lives of the
indentures. |
|
|
|
Elimination of interest expense on notes of Holding for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2004 of approximately
$34,894,000. No such pro forma adjustment was necessary for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. The Holding
debt was paid off with the proceeds of EMJs IPO in April
2005. |
(e) Income Tax Provision To reflect the
pro forma effect on consolidated income tax expense of the above
adjustments, determined based on an estimated effective tax rate
of 38% for the combined company.
98
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA (Continued)
This estimate could change based on changes in the applicable
tax rates and finalization of the combined companys tax
position.
(f) Shares Outstanding The pro forma
combined weighted average number of basic and diluted shares
outstanding is calculated by adding Reliances weighted
average number of basic and diluted shares of common stock
outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and adding
the incremental number of Reliance shares to be issued for EMJ
common stock per the terms of the merger agreement. Assuming a
Reliance average closing price of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period of $79.89, which would be the average closing
price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended on
February 22, 2006, the exchange ratio is 0.0892. This
exchange ratio was applied to the EMJ shares outstanding of
50,237,094 to arrive at incremental Reliance shares of
4,481,148. The following table illustrates these computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Twelve | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
Description |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance weighted average common shares
|
|
|
32,888,726 |
|
|
|
32,480,101 |
|
|
Incremental Reliance shares issued for merger
|
|
|
4,481,148 |
|
|
|
4,481,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma combined weighted average common shares
|
|
|
37,369,874 |
|
|
|
36,961,249 |
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance weighted average common shares
|
|
|
33,062,949 |
|
|
|
32,675,379 |
|
|
Incremental Reliance shares issued for merger
|
|
|
4,481,148 |
|
|
|
4,481,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma combined weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
37,544,097 |
|
|
|
37,156,527 |
|
99
DESCRIPTION OF RELIANCE CAPITAL STOCK
As a result of the merger, EMJ stockholders will become Reliance
shareholders. Your rights as a Reliance shareholder will be
governed by California law, Reliances restated articles of
incorporation and Reliances bylaws. The following
description of Reliances capital stock, including the
Reliance shares to be issued in the merger, reflects the
anticipated structure of the combined company at the completion
of the merger.
The description summarizes the material terms of Reliances
capital stock. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the applicable provisions of California law, Reliances
restated articles of incorporation and Reliances restated
and amended bylaws, in each case, as in effect on the date of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
Reliance Common Stock
Reliance is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of
common stock, no par value per share. As of February 24,
2006, there were 33,155,949 shares of Reliance common stock
outstanding. All of the issued and outstanding Reliance shares
are, and upon the issuance of Reliance shares in connection with
the merger will be, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
Reliance currently pays a regular quarterly cash dividend on its
common stock and has paid common stock dividends to its
shareholders for the past 46 years. The current quarterly
dividend is $0.10 per share.
The holders of Reliance common stock are entitled to one vote
per share on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders.
In the event of liquidation, holders of Reliance common stock
would be entitled to receive proportionately any assets legally
available for distribution to Reliance stockholders with respect
to shares held by them, subject to any prior rights of the
holders of any Reliance preferred stock then outstanding.
|
|
|
Preemptive or Other Subscription Rights |
Holders of Reliance common stock do not have any preemptive
rights to subscribe for any securities of Reliance.
|
|
|
Conversion and Other Rights |
No conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions apply to
the Reliance common stock, and the holders of Reliance shares
are not liable to further calls or assessments by Reliance.
Reliance Preferred Stock
Reliance is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, no par value per share. As of February 24,
2006, there were no shares of Reliance preferred stock issued
and outstanding. Reliances restated articles of
incorporation provide that shares of preferred stock may be
issued from time to time in one or more series by the board of
directors. The board can fix the preferences, conversion and
other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption
of each series of preferred stock. The rights of preferred
stockholders may supersede the rights of common stockholders.
100
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDERS RIGHTS
EMJ is incorporated in Delaware and Reliance is incorporated in
California. Your rights as an EMJ stockholder are governed by
the Delaware General Corporation Law, the EMJ certificate of
incorporation and the EMJ bylaws. Upon completion of the merger,
you will exchange your shares of EMJ common stock for cash and
shares of Reliance common stock, and as Reliance shareholders
your rights will be governed by the California General
Corporation Law, the Reliance articles of incorporation and the
Reliance bylaws.
The following is a summary of the material differences between
the rights of holders of Reliance common stock and the rights of
holders of EMJ common stock, but does not purport to be a
complete description of those differences. These differences may
be determined in full by reference to the Delaware General
Corporation Law, the California General Corporation Law, the EMJ
certificate of incorporation, the Reliance articles of
incorporation, the EMJ bylaws and the Reliance bylaws. The EMJ
certificate of incorporation, the Reliance articles of
incorporation and the EMJ and Reliance bylaws are subject to
amendment in accordance with their terms. Copies of the
governing corporate instruments are available, without charge,
to any person, including any beneficial owner to whom this proxy
statement/ prospectus is delivered, by following the
instructions listed under Where You Can Find More
Information on page .
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock |
|
Authorized Stock. Reliances articles of
incorporation authorize: |
|
Authorized Stock. EMJs certificate of incorporation
authorizes: |
|
100,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share;
and |
|
80,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value
per share; and |
|
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value per share. |
|
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value
per share. |
|
Preferred Stock. Reliances articles of
incorporation provide that shares of preferred stock may be
issued from time to time in one or more series by the board of
directors. The board can fix the preferences, conversion and
other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption
of each series of preferred stock. The rights of preferred
stockholders may supersede the rights of common stockholders. As
of February 24, 2006, there were no shares of Reliance
preferred stock issued and outstanding. |
|
Preferred Stock. EMJs certificate of incorporation
provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from time
to time in one or more series by the board of directors. The
board can fix the designations, preference, limitations and
relative rights of each series of preferred stock. The rights of
preferred stockholders may supersede the rights of common
stockholders. As of February 24, 2006, there were no shares
of EMJ preferred stock issued and outstanding. |
Number of Directors |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, the board of
directors of a corporation must consist of one or more members,
each of whom must be a natural person. The Reliance bylaws
provide that the Reliance board of directors is to consist of
not less than nine nor more than fifteen members, which number
may be changed from time to time within |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the board of
directors of a corporation must consist of one or more members,
each of whom must be a natural person. The EMJ bylaws provide
that the EMJ board of directors is to consist of not less than
three nor more than nine members, which number may be changed
from time to time within such range by the |
101
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
such range by the Reliance board of directors. Currently, the
number of members of the Reliance board of directors is nine.
|
|
EMJ board of directors. Currently, the number of members of the
EMJ board of directors is nine. |
Classification of Board of Directors |
|
The California General Corporation Law permits classification of
the board of directors of California corporations whose stock is
listed on the Nasdaq National Market, the New York Stock
Exchange, or the American Stock Exchange, referred to as a
Listed Corporation, if the corporation adopts an amendment to
its articles of incorporation or bylaws setting forth the
classification provisions.
Reliances bylaws divide its board of directors into two
classes, which are to be as nearly equal in number as possible,
and require one class to be elected each year and serve a
two-year term. |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law permits classification of a
Delaware corporations board of directors if the
corporations certificate of incorporation, an initial
bylaw or a bylaw approved by the stockholders so provides. The
EMJ certificate of incorporation and the EMJ bylaws do not
provide for classification of the EMJ board of directors. |
Cumulative Voting |
|
California law generally provides that if any shareholder has
given notice of his or her intention to cumulate votes for the
election of directors, any other shareholder of the corporation
is also entitled to cumulate his or her votes at such
election.
Most California corporations are required by the California
General Corporation Law to give shareholders the option to
cumulate such shareholders votes for the election of
directors. A California corporation that is a Listed Corporation
can eliminate cumulative voting with shareholder approval to
adopt amendments to the corporations articles of
incorporation or bylaws.
The Reliance bylaws provide for cumulative voting for the
election of directors at meetings of shareholders. Accordingly,
Reliance shareholders have cumulative voting rights in
connection with the election of directors; provided that no
shareholder can cumulate votes for any nominee unless the
nominee has been nominated as a candidate for director prior to
voting and the shareholder has given notice prior to voting of
his intention to cumulate his votes. If any one shareholder has
given such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes. |
|
Under Delaware law, cumulative voting is not mandatory, and
cumulative voting rights must be provided in a
corporations certificate of incorporation if stockholders
are to be entitled to cumulative voting rights. The EMJ
certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not provide for
cumulative voting. Accordingly, EMJ stockholders do not have
cumulative voting rights in connection with the election of
directors. |
Removal of Directors |
102
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, the board of
directors may declare vacant the office of a director who has
been declared of unsound mind by an order of court or convicted
of a felony. Further, any director or the entire board of
directors may be removed, with or without cause, with the
approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote thereon; however, no director may be removed (unless the
entire board is removed) if the number of shares voted against
the removal would be sufficient to elect the director under
cumulative voting. In addition, when by the provisions of
Reliances articles of incorporation, the holders of the
shares of any class or series are entitled to elect one or more
directors, any director so elected may be removed only by the
applicable vote of the holders of the shares of that class or
series. Shareholders holding at least 10% of the outstanding
shares in any class may sue in superior court to remove from
office any officer or director for fraud, dishonest acts or
gross abuse of authority or discretion. |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that, in the
absence of cumulative voting or a classified board, any director
or the entire board of directors may be removed, with or without
cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled
to vote in an election of directors. EMJ stockholders may remove
one or all of the EMJ directors with or without cause. |
Filing of Vacancies on the Board of Directors |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, any vacancy on the
board of directors other than one created by removal of a
director may be filled by the board of directors, unless
otherwise provided in the corporations articles of
incorporation or bylaws.
Under Reliances bylaws, vacancies on the board of
directors may be filled by the vote of a majority of the
remaining directors, even if such remaining directors constitute
less than a quorum. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, vacancies and newly
created directorships may be filled by a majority of the
directors then in office, even though less than a quorum, or by
a sole remaining director unless otherwise provided in the
certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
Under the EMJ bylaws, vacancies on the board of directors may be
filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors,
even if such remaining directors constitute less than a quorum. |
Special Meetings of the Board |
|
Special meetings of the board of directors may be called by the
chairman of the board, the chief executive officer or by any two
directors. |
|
Special meetings of the board of directors may be called by the
president or any director. |
Special Meetings of the Shareholders |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, special
shareholder meetings of a corporation may be called by the
corporations board of directors, the chairman of the
board, the president or the holders of shares entitled to cast
not less than 10% of the votes at such meeting or such
additional persons as are authorized by the articles of
incorporation or bylaws.
The Reliance bylaws provide that a special meeting of |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, special stockholder
meetings of a corporation may be called by the
corporations board of directors, or by any person or
persons authorized to do so by the corporations
certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
The EMJ bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders
may be called for any purpose by the board of directors,
president (or in the event of his |
103
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
shareholders may be called for any purpose by the chairman of
the board, the chief executive officer, the president, the board
of directors, or by shareholders holding not less than 10% of
the voting shares of the corporation.
|
|
absence or disability, the executive vice president), or the
holders of not less than 20% of all of the outstanding shares of
EMJ entitled to vote at the meeting. |
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations |
|
Neither California General Corporation Law nor the Reliance
bylaws contains any specific provisions regarding notice of
shareholders proposals or nominations for directors.
Reliance has never received a shareholder proposal or nomination
for director, but requires that a shareholder proposal be
received by that the date specified in the proxy statement of
the prior year, which is generally 120 days prior to the
first anniversary of the date that Reliance commenced mailing
its proxy materials for the preceding years annual meeting. |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law does not contain any
specific provisions regarding notice of stockholders
proposals or nominations for directors. The EMJ bylaws specify
that nominations of individuals for election as directors and
stockholder proposals may be made pursuant to EMJs notice
of meeting, by or at the direction of the EMJ board of directors
or by any holder of EMJ stock entitled to vote on the election
of directors who complies with the requisite notice procedure.
The notice procedure requires that a stockholders proposal
or nomination of an individual for election as a director must
be made in writing and received by the secretary of EMJ not
later than the close of business on the 90th or earlier
than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the
first anniversary of the date EMJ commenced mailing its proxy
materials for the preceding years annual meeting; provided
that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than
30 days prior to, or delayed by more than 30 days
after, the anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be
delivered not later than the close of business on the later of
the 60th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day
following the day on which public announcement of the date of
such annual meeting is first made.
In the event that the number of directors to be elected to
EMJs board of directors is increased and there is no
public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or
specifying the size of the increased board of directors made by
the corporation at least 100 days prior to the anniversary
of the date EMJ commenced mailing its proxy materials for the
preceding years annual meeting, a stockholders
notice required by EMJs bylaws will also be considered
timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions
created by such increase, if it shall be delivered not later
than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on
which such |
104
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
public announcement is first made by the corporation.
EMJs board of directors and its Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee have adopted EMJs Stockholder
Nominations and Communications Policy which provides for the
consideration of candidates for director nominees recommended by
stockholders and stockholder communications to the Board. |
Advance Notice Provisions for Meetings of Shareholders |
|
The Reliance bylaws provide that written notice of all meetings
of shareholders must be given not less than ten or more than
60 days before the date of the meeting to each shareholder
entitled to vote at the meeting. The notice shall state the
place, date and hour of the meeting. If it is a special meeting,
the notice shall also include the general nature of the business
to be transacted. If it is an annual meeting, the notice shall
also include those matters which the board of directors intends
to present for action by the shareholders. |
|
The EMJ bylaws provide that written notice of a stockholder
meeting must state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and,
in case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which
the special meeting is called. The notice must be given to each
stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting not less than ten or
more than 60 days before the meeting. In addition, the
Delaware General Corporation Law requires that the notice
include the means of remote communication, if any, by which
stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in
person and vote at such meeting. |
Action by Written Consent of the Shareholders |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, unless otherwise
provided in the corporations articles of incorporation,
any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting
of shareholders may be taken without a meeting and without prior
notice, if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so
taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not
less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to
authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares
entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
The Reliance articles of incorporation do not contain a
limitation on written consents. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless otherwise
provided in the corporations certificate of incorporation,
any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting
of stockholders may be taken without a meeting and without prior
notice, if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so
taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not
less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to
authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares
entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
The EMJ certificate of incorporation does not contain a
prohibition against written consents. |
Proxies |
|
The Reliance bylaws provide that any shareholder entitled to
vote or execute consents shall have the right to do so by
designating another person to act for such shareholder by proxy.
No proxy, however, shall be voted or acted upon after
11 months from its date, unless the proxy provides for a
longer period, but in no event longer than five years. |
|
The EMJ bylaws enable each stockholder entitled to vote at a
meeting of stockholders to authorize another person to act for
such stockholder by proxy. No proxy, however, may be voted or
acted upon after three years from its date, unless the proxy
specifies a longer period. |
Charter Amendment |
105
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, an amendment to
the articles of incorporation requires the approval of the
corporations board of directors and the affirmative vote
of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote
thereon, either before or after the board of directors approval,
although certain minor amendments may be adopted by the board of
directors alone, such as amendments causing stock splits.
Under the General California Corporation Law, the holders of the
outstanding shares of a class of stock are entitled to vote as a
class if a proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation
would: (1) increase or decrease the aggregate number of
authorized shares of such class, (2) effect an exchange,
reclassification or cancellation of all or part of the shares of
such class, other than a stock split, (3) effect an exchange, or
create a right of exchange, of all or part of the shares of
another class into the shares of such class, (4) change the
rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions of the shares of
such class, (5) create a new class of shares having rights,
preferences or privileges prior to the shares of such class, or
increase the rights, preferences or privileges or the number of
authorized shares having rights, preference or privileges prior
to the shares of such class, (6) in the case of preferred
shares, divide the shares of any class into series having
different rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions or
authorize the board of directors to do so or (7) cancel or
otherwise affect dividends on the shares of such class which
have accrued but have not been paid. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, an amendment to the
certificate of incorporation requires (1) the approval of
the board of directors, (2) the approval of the holders of
a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote upon the
proposed amendment and (3) the approval of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote
thereon as a class.
The EMJ certificate of incorporation provides that EMJ reserves
the right at any time to amend or repeal any provision of the
EMJ certificate of incorporation and that all rights conferred
thereby are granted subject to such right of EMJ, but does not
contain any provisions altering the standards for amendment. |
Amendment of Bylaws |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, bylaws may be
adopted, amended or repealed by a majority of the shareholders
entitled to vote or by the board of directors; provided,
however, the corporations articles of incorporation or
bylaws may restrict or eliminate the power of the board to
adopt, amend or repeal any or all bylaws.
Neither the Reliance articles of incorporation nor the Reliance
bylaws restrict the power of the board to adopt, amend or repeal
the Reliance bylaws. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, bylaws may be
adopted, amended or repealed by the stockholders entitled to
vote, and by the board of directors if the corporations
certificate of incorporation confers the power to adopt, amend
or repeal the corporations bylaws upon the directors. The
EMJ certificate of incorporation confers the power to adopt,
amend or repeal the EMJ bylaws upon the EMJ board of directors,
subject to the power of the EMJ stockholders to alter or repeal
any bylaws made by the EMJ board of directors. |
Dividends and Repurchases of Shares |
106
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, no distributions
to a corporations shareholders may be made unless: either
(1)(a) amount of the retained earnings of the corporation
immediately prior to the distribution equals or exceeds the
amount of the proposed distribution; or (b) immediately after
the distribution, the sum of the assets of the corporation
(excluding certain items) is at least equal to
11/4
times its liabilities, and the current assets of the corporation
are at least equal to its current liabilities, or if the average
of the earnings of the corporation before taxes on income and
before interest expense for the two preceding fiscal years was
less than the average of the interest expense of the corporation
for those fiscal years, at least equal to
11/4
times its current liabilities; and (2) after giving effect to
the distribution, the corporation is able to meet its
liabilities as they come due.
The California General Corporation Law generally provides that a
corporation may acquire its own shares, with the payment for
such shares being subject to the same restrictions as dividend
payments. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the board of
directors of a corporation may, subject to any restrictions
contained in its certificate of incorporation, declare and pay
dividends upon the shares of its capital stock either
(1) out of its surplus or (2) if there is not surplus,
out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is
declared or the preceding fiscal year, provided that if the
capital of the corporation is less than the aggregate amount of
capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all
classes having a preference upon the distributions of the assets
of the corporation, then the board of directors may not declare
and pay dividends out of net profits. The Delaware General
Corporation Law generally provides that a corporation may redeem
or purchase its shares only if such redemption or repurchase
would not impair the capital of the corporation. |
Appraisal and Dissenters Rights |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, if the approval of
the outstanding shares of the corporation is required for a
merger, share exchange or reorganization, each shareholder
entitled to vote on the transaction, and who did not vote in
favor of the merger, share exchange or reorganization, may
require the corporation to purchase for cash at fair market
value the shares owned by such shareholder, except that no
dissenters rights are available for shares listed on any
national securities exchange certified by the Commissioner of
Corporations, such as the New York Stock Exchange, or listed on
the Nasdaq National Market, unless there exists with respect to
such shares any restriction on transfer imposed by the
corporation or by any law or regulation or if demands for
payment are filed with respect to 5% or more of the outstanding
shares of that class. |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a stockholder of a
Delaware corporation, such as EMJ, who has not voted in favor
of, nor consented in writing to, a merger or consolidation in
which the corporation is participating generally has the right
to an appraisal of the fair value of the stockholders
shares of stock, subject to specified procedural requirements.
The Delaware General Corporation Law does not confer appraisal
rights, however, if the corporations stock is
either(1) listed on a national securities exchange or
designated as a national market system security on an
interdealer quotation system by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. or(2) held of record by more than
2,000 holders. Even if a corporations stock meets the
foregoing requirements, however, the Delaware General
Corporation Law provides that appraisal rights generally will be
permitted if stockholders of the corporation are required to
accept for their stock in any merger, consolidation or similar
transaction anything other than (1) shares of the
corporation surviving or resulting from the transaction, or
depository receipts representing shares of the surviving or
resulting corporation, or those shares or depository receipts
plus cash in lieu of fractional interests, (2) shares of |
107
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
any other corporation, or depository receipts representing
shares of the other corporation, or those shares or depository
receipts plus cash in lieu of fractional interests, which shares
or depository receipts are listed on a national securities
exchange or designated as a national market system security on
an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000
holders or (3) any combination of the foregoing.
Notwithstanding that the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock
are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, holders of EMJ common
stock will have appraisal rights as a result of the merger
because the merger consideration consists of Reliance common
stock and cash. See the discussion in Appraisal Rights for
EMJ Stockholders on page 114. |
Liability and Indemnity |
|
The California General Corporation Law provides that a
corporation may indemnify a director or officer against expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by him in association with any
action, suit or proceeding in which he is involved by reason of
his service to the corporation, if the director or officer acted
in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to
be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation,
and with respect to a criminal proceeding, the director or
officer had no reason to believe that the act was unlawful.
The California General Corporation Law requires a corporation to
indemnify a director or officer who successfully defends himself
in such a proceeding.
The Reliance articles of incorporation provide that directors
shall not be personally liable to the corporation for monetary
damages to the fullest extent allowed under the California
General Corporation Law. The Reliance bylaws provide that
directors and officers shall be indemnified to the fullest
extent permitted by the California General Corporation Law. |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation
may indemnify a director or officer against expenses actually
and reasonably incurred by him in association with any action,
suit or proceeding in which he is involved by reason of his
service to the corporation, if the director or officer acted in
good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and
with respect to a criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had no reason to believe that the act was unlawful.
The Delaware General Corporation Law requires a corporation to
indemnify a director or officer who successfully defends himself
in such a proceeding.
The EMJ certificate of incorporation provides that directors
shall not be personally liable for breaches of their duties as
directors, to the fullest extent allowed under the Delaware
General Corporation Law. The EMJ bylaws provide that directors
and officers shall be indemnified to the fullest extent
permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. |
Indemnity Insurance |
|
Reliance has purchased directors and officers
liability insurance for the benefit of its directors and
officers. Reliance has also entered into |
|
The EMJ bylaws authorize the purchase of indemnity insurance for
the benefit of any person who is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of EMJ, or is or |
108
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
indemnification agreements with each of its directors and
officers, to indemnify these persons against certain
liabilities, including in cases where indemnification might not
otherwise be available in the absence of these agreements.
|
|
was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability
asserted against such person and incurred by such person in such
capacity, or arising out of such persons status as such,
whether or not EMJ would have the power to indemnify such person
against such liability under EMJs bylaws. EMJ has
purchased directors and officers insurance and has
entered into an indemnification agreement with each of its
directors and officers. |
Preemptive Rights |
|
Under California law, a shareholder is not entitled to
preemptive rights to subscribe for additional issuances of
stock, or any security convertible into stock, unless the rights
are specifically granted in the articles of incorporation.
The Reliance articles of incorporation do not provide for any
such preemptive rights. |
|
Under Delaware law, a stockholder is not entitled to preemptive
rights to subscribe for additional issuances of stock, or any
security convertible into stock, unless the rights are
specifically granted in the certificate of incorporation.
The EMJ certificate of incorporation does not provide for any
such preemptive rights. |
Certain Business Combination Restrictions |
|
Under California law, except where the fairness of the
transaction has been approved by the California Commissioner of
Corporations and except in a short-form merger (the
merger of a parent corporation with a subsidiary in which the
parent owns at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class
of the subsidiarys stock), if the surviving corporation or
its parent corporation owns, directly or indirectly, shares of
the target corporation representing more than 50% of the voting
power of the target corporation prior to the merger, the
nonredeemable common stock of a target corporation may be
converted only into nonredeemable common stock of the surviving
corporation or its parent corporation, unless all of the
shareholders of the class consent. The effect of this provision
is to prohibit a cash-out merger of minority shareholders,
except where the majority shareholders already own 90% or more
of the voting power of the target corporation and could,
therefore, effect a short-form merger to accomplish such a
cash-out of minority shareholders.
The California General Corporation Law also provides that,
except in certain circumstances, when a tender offer or a
proposal for reorganization or for a |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law generally prohibits a
corporation from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder (generally, one who
beneficially owns 15% or more of the voting power) for a period
of three years following the date that the stockholder became an
interested stockholder unless:
prior to that time the corporations board of
directors approved either the business combination or the
transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
upon completion of the transaction that resulted in
the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder,
the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the
voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the
transaction commenced, subject to specified adjustments, or
at or subsequent to that time, the business
combination is approved by the corporations board of
directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is |
109
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
sale of assets is made by an interested party (generally a
controlling or managing party of the target corporation), an
affirmative opinion in writing as to the fairness of the
consideration to be paid to the shareholders must be delivered
to shareholders. This fairness opinion requirement does not
apply to a corporation that does not have shares held of record
by at least 100 persons, or to a transaction that has been
qualified under California state securities laws. Furthermore,
if a tender of shares or vote is sought pursuant to an
interested partys proposal and a later proposal is made by
another party at least ten days prior to the date of acceptance
of the interested partys proposal, the shareholders must
be informed of the later offer and be afforded a reasonable
opportunity to withdraw any vote, consent or proxy, or to
withdraw any tendered shares.
|
|
not owned by the interested stockholder.
The three-year prohibition on business combinations with an
interested stockholder does not apply under certain
circumstances, including business combinations with a
corporation that does not have a class of voting stock that
is:
listed on a national securities exchange;
authorized for quotation on the Nasdaq Stock Market;
or
held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders;
unless, in each case, this result was directly or indirectly
caused by the interested stockholder or from a
transaction in which a person became an interested
stockholder.
The term business combination is defined to include
a wide variety of transactions, including mergers,
consolidations, sales or other dispositions of 10% or more of a
corporations assets and various other transactions that
may benefit an interested stockholder.
The EMJ certificate of incorporation opts out of the
restrictions prescribed by this section of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. The merger does not constitute a prohibited
business combination under this statute. |
Vote on Extraordinary Corporate Transactions |
|
Under the California General Corporation Law, the principal
terms of a merger or reorganization must be approved by a vote
of the board of directors of each constituent corporation in a
merger or sale of assets reorganization. The California General
Corporation Law also generally requires the affirmative vote of
a majority of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to
vote thereon (two classes of common stock differing only as to
voting rights are considered to be a single class for these
purposes), except that, unless required by a corporations
articles of incorporation, no authorizing shareholder vote is
required of a corporation surviving a merger if the shareholders
of such corporation shall own, immediately after the merger,
more
than5/6
of the voting power of the surviving corporation. Regardless of
the voting power |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless otherwise
provided in the corporations certificate of incorporation,
a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
corporations assets, a merger or a consolidation of the
corporation with another corporation requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the board of directors (except in certain
limited circumstances) and, with certain exceptions, the
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote on the matter. Furthermore, under the Delaware
General Corporation Law, unless otherwise provided in the
corporations certificate of incorporation, approval of the
stockholders of a surviving corporation in a merger is not
required if: (1) the agreement of merger does not
amend in any respect the certificate of incorporation of the |
110
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
exercised by the shareholders in the resulting corporation,
however, the California General Corporation Law requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote thereon if (1) the surviving corporations
articles of incorporation will be amended and would otherwise
require shareholder approval or (2) shareholders of such
corporation will receive shares of the surviving corporation
having different rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions
(shares in a foreign corporation are, by definition, considered
to have different rights) than the shares surrendered.
|
|
surviving corporation, (2) the shares outstanding
immediately before the effectiveness of the merger are not
changed by the merger and (3) either no shares of
common stock of the surviving corporation and no shares,
securities or obligations convertible into this stock are to be
issued or delivered under the plan of merger, or the authorized
unissued shares or the treasury shares of common stock of the
surviving corporation to be issued or delivered under the plan
of merger, plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any
other shares, securities or obligations to be issued or
delivered under the plan do not exceed 20% of the shares of
common stock of the surviving corporation outstanding
immediately prior to the merger.
Approval of the merger requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common
stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. |
Fiduciary Duties of Directors |
|
Under California law, directors are required to perform their
duties in good faith in a manner that the director believes to
be in the best interests of the corporation and its
shareholders. The duty of care under California law requires
that the directors act with such care, including reasonable
inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position
would use under similar circumstances. |
|
Under Delaware law, the standards of conduct for directors have
developed through Delaware case law. Generally, directors of
Delaware corporations are subject to a duty of loyalty and a
duty of care. The duty of loyalty requires directors to refrain
from self- dealing and the duty of care requires directors in
managing the corporate affairs to use that level of care which
ordinarily careful and prudent persons would use in similar
circumstances. When directors act consistently with their duties
of loyalty and care, their decisions generally are presumed to
be valid under the business judgment rule. |
Interested Party Transactions |
|
Under California law, no contract or transaction that is between
a corporation and one or more of its directors, or between a
corporation and another firm in which one or more of the
corporations directors has a material financial interest
is void or voidable solely because such director or other
corporation or firm is a party or because the director is
present at or participates in the meeting of the board of
directors or committee that authorizes the contract or
transaction, if one or more of the following is true: (1) the
material facts of the transaction and the directors
interest are fully disclosed to or known by the board of
directors or a committee of the board of directors, and the
board of directors or the committee |
|
Under Delaware law, no contract or transaction that is between a
corporation and one or more of its directors or officers,
between a corporation and another corporation in which one or
more of the corporations directors or officers are
directors or officers, or between a corporation and another
corporation in which one or more of the corporations
directors or officers has a financial interest is void or
voidable solely because of such relationship or interest, or
solely because the director or officer is present at or
participates in the meeting of the board of directors or
committee that authorizes the contract or transaction, or solely
because the directors or officers vote was counted
for this purpose, if one or |
111
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
authorizes or ratifies the transaction in good faith by a vote
sufficient without counting the vote of any interested director,
and such contract or transaction is just and reasonable as to
the corporation at the time the board of directors approves or
ratifies it, (2) the material facts of the transaction and the
directors interest are fully disclosed to or known by the
uninterested shareholders entitled to vote on the matter and
they specifically approve in good faith the contract or
transaction or (3) the contract or transaction is just and
reasonable to the corporation at the time it was approved or
ratified with the burden of proof on the person asserting the
validity of the contract or transaction.
|
|
more of the following is true: (1) the material facts of
the contract or transaction and the directors or
officers relationship or interest are disclosed to or
known by the board of directors or a committee of the board of
directors, and the board of directors or the committee in good
faith authorizes the contract or transaction by an affirmative
vote of the majority of the disinterested directors (even though
these directors are less than a quorum), (2) the material
facts of the contract or transaction and the directors or
officers relationship or interest are disclosed to or
known by the shareholders entitled to vote on the matter and
they specifically approve in good faith the contract or
transaction or (3) the contract or transaction is fair to
the corporation as of the time it was authorized, approved or
ratified. |
Shareholder Suits |
|
Under California law, a shareholder bringing a derivative action
on behalf of the corporation need not have been a shareholder at
the time of the transaction in question, provided that certain
tests are met concerning the fairness of allowing the action to
go forward. The shareholder must make his or her demands on the
board of directors before filing suit. California law also
provides that the corporation or the defendant in a derivative
suit may make a motion to the court for an order requiring the
plaintiff shareholder to furnish a security bond. |
|
Under Delaware law, a stockholder may initiate a derivative
action to enforce a right of a corporation if the corporation
wrongfully fails to enforce the right itself. An individual may
also commence a class action suit on behalf of himself and other
similarly situated stockholders to enforce an obligation owed to
the stockholders directly where the requirements for maintaining
a class action under Delaware law have been met. The complaint
must: (1) state that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the
time of the transaction of which the plaintiff complains or that
the plaintiffs shares thereafter devolved on the plaintiff
by operation of law and (2) with respect to a derivative
action: (a) allege with particularity the efforts made by
the plaintiff to obtain the action the plaintiff desires from
the directors or (b) allege with particularity that such
effort would have been futile. Additionally, the plaintiff must
remain a stockholder through the duration of the suit. The
action will not be dismissed or compromised without the approval
of the Delaware Court of Chancery. |
Inspection of Books and Records |
|
Under California law, shareholders holding an aggregate of 5% or
more of the corporations outstanding voting shares, or
shareholders holding an aggregate of 1% or more of such shares
who have filed a Schedule 14A with the SEC, shall have an
absolute right to inspect and copy the corporations
shareholder list. In addition, Section 1601 of the
California General Corporation Law provides that any shareholder
may inspect the accounting books |
|
Under Delaware law, any stockholder is entitled to inspect and
copy books and records, including the corporations stock
ledger and a list of its stockholders, as long as the inspection
is for a proper purpose and during the usual hours of business,
and the demand is made in writing and under oath. |
112
|
|
|
Reliance |
|
EMJ |
|
|
|
|
and records and minutes of a corporation, provided that the
inspection is for a purpose reasonably related to the
persons interests as a shareholder.
The Reliance bylaws also provide that, upon written demand,
stockholders may inspect Reliances books of account and
minutes of proceedings of the shareholders and the board of
directors for purposes reasonably related to the
shareholders interests.
|
|
|
Stockholder Rights Plan |
|
The California General Corporation Law does not include a
statute expressly validating shareholders rights plans. Reliance
currently does not have a shareholder rights plan in effect. |
|
The Delaware General Corporation Law does not include a
statutory provision expressly validating stockholder rights
plans; however, such plans have generally been upheld by
decision of courts applying Delaware law. Dead hand stockholder
rights plans are not permitted under Delaware law.
EMJ currently does not have a stockholder rights plan in effect,
but under Delaware law the EMJ board of directors could adopt
such a plan without stockholder approval. |
113
APPRAISAL RIGHTS FOR EMJ STOCKHOLDERS
The following summary of the provisions of Section 262 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law is not intended to be a
complete statement of the provisions and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, a copy of which is
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex E and
is incorporated into this summary by reference.
EMJ is a Delaware corporation. Section 262 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law provides appraisal rights (sometimes
referred to as dissenters rights) under some
circumstances to stockholders of a Delaware corporation that is
involved in a merger.
Record holders of EMJs common stock who follow the
appropriate procedures are entitled to appraisal rights under
Section 262 in connection with the merger.
Eligible Stockholders. If the merger agreement is
adopted and approved by EMJs stockholders and the merger
agreement is not abandoned or terminated, stockholders who did
not vote in favor of the merger agreement may be entitled to
appraisal rights as described in Section 262. Failure to
vote against the merger agreement will not constitute a waiver
of your appraisal rights. A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER
AGREEMENT BY A STOCKHOLDER WILL RESULT IN A WAIVER OF THE
STOCKHOLDERS APPRAISAL RIGHTS.
A record holder such as a broker, who holds shares as nominee
for several beneficial owners, or the trustee of EMJs
retirement savings plan, may exercise appraisal rights with
respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners,
while not exercising these rights with respect to the shares
held for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written
demand should set forth the number of shares as to which
appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares is expressly
mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held
in the name of the record owner. Participants in EMJs
retirement savings plan who wish to exercise appraisal rights
are urged to consult with the trustee to determine if the
trustee will exercise such rights and to determine the
appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal
rights by the trustee. The trustee has the discretion to decide
whether or not to exercise appraisal rights when requested and,
therefore, there is no assurance that, when a participant
requests the trustee to exercise appraisal rights, the trustee
will exercise such rights. Stockholders who hold their shares in
brokerage accounts or other nominee forms and who wish to
exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult with their
brokers to determine the appropriate procedures for the making
of a demand for appraisal by the nominee.
If a stockholder has a beneficial interest in shares of common
stock that are held of record in a trust or in the name of
another person, such as a broker or nominee, and the stockholder
desires to perfect whatever appraisal rights they may have, the
stockholder must act promptly to cause the holder of record to
timely and properly follow the procedures set forth in
Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In
view of the complexity of the provisions of Section 262 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, EMJ stockholders that are
considering dissenting from the merger agreement should consult
their own legal advisors.
Exercising Procedures. Holders of EMJs
common stock that properly perfect their appraisal rights
pursuant to Section 262 will be entitled to have their
shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to
receive payment of the fair value of their shares,
exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger agreement, together
with a fair rate of interest, if any, as determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery.
This proxy statement/ prospectus constitutes notice to holders
of EMJ shares concerning the availability of appraisal rights
under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Any stockholder who wishes to exercise appraisal rights or
wishes to preserve the holders right to do so should
review the following discussion and Annex E carefully.
Failure to timely and properly comply with the procedures
specified in Section 262 will result in the loss of
appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
114
A stockholder wishing to exercise appraisal rights must deliver
to EMJ, before the vote on the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement at the special meeting, a written demand for
appraisal of the stockholders common stock, which must
reasonably inform EMJ of the identity of the holder of record,
as well as the intention of the holder to demand an appraisal of
the fair value of the shares held. A demand for appraisal should
be executed by or on behalf of the holder of record, fully and
correctly, as the holders name appears on the
holders stock certificates. A PROXY OR VOTE AGAINST THE
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT WILL NOT
CONSTITUTE A DEMAND FOR APPRAISAL.
To properly perfect appraisal rights, the stockholder must hold
of record the shares on the date the written demand for
appraisal is made, must continue to hold the shares through the
effective time of the merger, and must either vote against or
abstain from voting for the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
All written demands for appraisal of EMJs common stock
should be mailed or delivered to EMJ at 10650 Alameda Street,
Lynwood, California 90262, Attention: Secretary, so as to be
received before the vote on the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement at the special meeting. The method of delivery,
including any risk of delay or loss of the notice, is borne
solely by you. The EMJ shares with respect to which holders have
perfected their appraisal rights in accordance with
Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and
have not effectively withdrawn or lost their appraisal rights
are referred to in this section as the dissenting
shares.
Within ten days after the effective time of the merger, RSAC, as
the surviving corporation in the merger, must send a notice of
the effective date of the merger to each person that satisfied
the appropriate provisions of Section 262. Within
120 days after the effective time of the merger, holders of
EMJ shares may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery
for the appraisal of their shares. Within 120 days of the
effective date of the merger, the holders of dissenting shares
may also, upon written request, receive from Reliance a
statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted
in favor of the merger agreement and with respect to which
demands for appraisals have been received and the aggregate
number of holders of such shares.
Costs. The costs of the appraisal action may be
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the
parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable. The
Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion
of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with
an appraisal, including reasonable attorneys fees and the
fees and expenses of experts utilized in the appraisal
proceeding, be charged pro rata against the value of all of the
shares entitled to appraisal.
Withdrawal; Loss of Appraisal Rights. If any
stockholder that demands appraisal under Section 262 fails
to perfect, or effectively withdraws or loses the right to
appraisal, as provided in the Delaware General Corporation Law,
the common stock of the stockholder will be converted into the
merger consideration in accordance with the merger agreement
without interest. A stockholder will fail to perfect, or will
effectively lose, the right to appraisal, if no petition for
appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective time
of the merger. A stockholder may withdraw a demand for appraisal
by delivering to EMJ a written withdrawal of the demand for
appraisal and acceptance of the terms of the merger. Once a
petition for appraisal is filed, the appraisal proceeding may
not be dismissed as to any stockholder absent court approval.
FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE STEPS REQUIRED BY SECTION 262 FOR
PERFECTING APPRAISAL RIGHTS MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF SUCH
RIGHTS, IN WHICH EVENT THE HOLDER OF EMJ COMMON STOCK WILL BE
ENTITLED TO RECEIVE ONLY THE CONSIDERATION SET FORTH IN THE
MERGER AGREEMENT FOR EACH SHARE OF STOCK OWNED BY THE
STOCKHOLDER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE TIME OF THE MERGER.
115
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Reliance, appearing in
Reliances Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (including schedules
appearing therein) and Reliance managements assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004 included therein, have been audited
by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included
therein, and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated
financial statements and managements assessment are
incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such reports
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of EMJ appearing in
EMJs Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for
the year ended March 31, 2005 (including schedules
appearing therein), have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth
in their report thereon included therein and have been
incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial
statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Reliance shares to be issued in the merger
will be passed upon by Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP. The
material United States federal income tax consequences of the
merger described in Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences beginning on page 87 will be passed on
for Reliance by Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP and for EMJ
by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, EMJs
board of directors knows of no matters that will be presented
for consideration at the special meeting other than as described
in this proxy statement/ prospectus. If any other matters
properly come before the special meeting or any postponements or
adjournments of the special meeting, the enclosed proxy will be
deemed to confer discretionary authority on the individuals
named as proxies to vote the EMJ shares represented by such
proxy as to any of those other matters. The individuals named as
proxies intend to vote in accordance with the recommendation of
the EMJ board of directors.
EMJ 2006 ANNUAL MEETING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
EMJ will hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2006 only if
the merger is not completed before the time it is required to
hold its 2006 annual meeting under its bylaws. Any stockholder
proposal for the annual meeting in 2006 must be sent to the
Secretary, EMJ, 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California 90262.
The deadline for receipt of a stockholder proposal intended to
be included in the proxy statement pursuant to
Rule 14a-8(e)(2)
under the Exchange Act is March 20, 2006. These proposals
must comply with SEC
Rule 14a-8 to be
included in the proxy statement.
Notice of director nominations by stockholders and any business
a stockholder intends to present at the 2006 annual meeting must
be received by EMJ no later than April 23, 2006.
Stockholders making a director nomination must provide the
information about the nominee and proposing stockholder required
by EMJs bylaws, EMJs Stockholder Nominations and
Communications Policy and the New York Stock Exchange listing
standards regarding director independence.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Reliance and EMJ file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any reports, statements or other information that
the companies
116
file at the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street,
NE, Room 1580, Washington D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC
at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference room in Washington
D.C. and in other locations. Reliances and EMJs SEC
filings are also available to the public from commercial
document retrieval services and at the Internet Website
maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of documents
filed by Reliance and EMJ with the SEC are also available at the
offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street,
New York, NY 10005.
Reliance has filed a registration statement on
Form S-4 under the
Securities Act with the SEC to register the issuance of Reliance
shares to EMJ stockholders in the merger. This proxy statement/
prospectus is a part of that registration statement and
constitutes a prospectus of Reliance and a proxy statement of
EMJ for use in connection with the special meeting. This proxy
statement/ prospectus does not contain all the information
contained in the registration statement because certain parts of
the registration statement are omitted in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the SEC. The registration statement and
the documents filed as exhibits to the registration statement
are available for inspection and copying as described above.
The SEC allows Reliance and EMJ to incorporate by
reference information into this proxy statement/
prospectus, which means that the companies can disclose
important information to you by referring you to another
document separately filed with the SEC. The information
incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this proxy
statement/ prospectus, except for any information superseded by
information contained directly in this proxy statement/
prospectus. This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates by
reference the documents set forth below that Reliance and EMJ
have previously filed with the SEC. These documents contain
important information about the companies.
|
|
|
Reliance SEC Filings
(SEC File
NO. 001-13122) |
|
Period Covered or Date Filed |
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarterly Periods ended March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005
and September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on May 2, 2005, June 6, 2005, June 22,
2005, July 8, 2005, September 16, 2005,
October 7, 2005, January 6, 2005, January 19,
2006, February 3, 2006 and February 16, 2006 (other
than the portions of those documents not deemed to be filed) |
|
|
The description of Reliance common stock set forth in
Reliances Registration Statement on
Form 8-A,
including all amendments and reports filed for the purpose of
updating such description |
|
Filed with the SEC on January 2, 1994 |
Note that among the documents incorporated by reference will be
Reliances Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which is expected to be
available on the SECs and Reliances Websites on
March 15, 2006.
117
|
|
|
EMJ SEC Filings
(SEC File
NO. 001-07537) |
|
Period Covered or Date Filed |
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarterly Periods ended June 30, 2005, September 28,
2005 and December 30, 2005 |
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on April 15, 2005, April 21, 2005, May 6,
2005 and January 19, 2006 (other than the portions of those
documents not deemed to be filed) |
|
The description of EMJ common stock set forth in EMJs
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A,
including all amendments and reports filed for the purpose of
updating such description |
|
Filed with the SEC on March 22, 2005 |
Reliance and EMJ also incorporate by reference additional
documents that either company may file with the SEC pursuant to
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus and before
the date of the special meeting. The additional documents so
incorporated include periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q and
Current Reports on
Form 8-K, as well
as proxy statements.
Reliance has supplied all information contained or incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus relating to
Reliance, and EMJ has supplied all such information relating to
EMJ.
You may obtain any of the documents incorporated by reference
through Reliance or EMJ, as the case may be, or the SEC or its
Internet Website, as described above. Documents incorporated by
reference are available from the companies without charge,
excluding all exhibits unless specifically incorporated by
reference as an exhibit to this proxy statement/ prospectus. You
may obtain documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company at the following
addresses, or by visiting the following Websites:
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
10650 Alameda Street |
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
Attention: Investor Relations |
Telephone: (213) 687-7700 |
|
Telephone: (323) 567-1122 |
www.rsac.com |
|
www.emjmetals.com |
Information contained on Reliances and EMJs Websites
is not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
EMJ stockholders requesting documents should do so by
March 24, 2006 to receive them before the special
meeting. You will not be charged for any of these documents that
you request. If you request any incorporated documents from
Reliance or EMJ, EMJ will mail them to you by first class mail,
or another equally prompt means, within one business day after
it receives your request.
Neither Reliance nor EMJ has authorized anyone to give any
information or make any representation about the merger or our
companies that is different from, or in addition to, that
contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus or in any of the
materials that have been incorporated in this proxy statement/
prospectus. Therefore, if anyone does give you information of
this sort, you should not rely on it. If you are in a
jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or solicitations
of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities offered by
this proxy statement/ prospectus or the solicitation of proxies
are unlawful, or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to
direct these types of activities, then the offer presented in
this proxy statement/ prospectus does not extend to you. The
information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus speaks
only as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus unless
the information specifically indicates that another date
applies.
118
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
Dated as of January 17, 2006
Among
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.,
RSAC ACQUISITION CORP.
And
EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I Definitions; The Merger |
|
|
A-1 |
|
Section 1.01.
|
|
Definitions; Interpretations |
|
|
A-1 |
|
Section 1.02.
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
A-8 |
|
Section 1.03.
|
|
Closing |
|
|
A-9 |
|
Section 1.04.
|
|
Effective Time |
|
|
A-9 |
|
Section 1.05.
|
|
Effects |
|
|
A-9 |
|
Section 1.06.
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
A-9 |
|
Section 1.07.
|
|
Directors |
|
|
A-10 |
|
Section 1.08.
|
|
Officers |
|
|
A-10 |
|
Section 1.09.
|
|
Additional Actions |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
ARTICLE II Effect on the Capital Stock of the Constituent
Corporations; Exchange of Certificates |
|
|
A-10 |
|
Section 2.01.
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock |
|
|
A-10 |
|
Section 2.02.
|
|
Exchange Procedures |
|
|
A-12 |
|
Section 2.03.
|
|
Company Stock Options; Holding Stock Options |
|
|
A-15 |
|
Section 2.04.
|
|
Dissenter Rights |
|
|
A-17 |
|
|
ARTICLE III Representations and Warranties of the Company |
|
|
A-17 |
|
Section 3.01.
|
|
Organization, Standing and Power |
|
|
A-17 |
|
Section 3.02.
|
|
Company Subsidiaries; Equity Interests |
|
|
A-18 |
|
Section 3.03.
|
|
Capital Structure |
|
|
A-18 |
|
Section 3.04.
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability |
|
|
A-19 |
|
Section 3.05.
|
|
No Conflicts; Consents |
|
|
A-20 |
|
Section 3.06.
|
|
Company SEC Documents; Company Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities |
|
|
A-21 |
|
Section 3.07.
|
|
Information Supplied |
|
|
A-22 |
|
Section 3.08.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
A-22 |
|
Section 3.09.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-23 |
|
Section 3.10.
|
|
Absence of Changes in Benefit Plans |
|
|
A-24 |
|
Section 3.11.
|
|
ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments |
|
|
A-25 |
|
Section 3.12.
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
A-28 |
|
Section 3.13.
|
|
Compliance with Applicable Laws |
|
|
A-28 |
|
Section 3.14.
|
|
Assets Other than Real Property Interests |
|
|
A-28 |
|
Section 3.15.
|
|
Real Property |
|
|
A-29 |
|
Section 3.16.
|
|
Labor Matters |
|
|
A-29 |
|
Section 3.17.
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
A-30 |
|
Section 3.18.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
A-32 |
|
Section 3.19.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
A-32 |
|
Section 3.20.
|
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
A-33 |
|
Section 3.21.
|
|
Brokers Fees; Finders Fees |
|
|
A-34 |
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Section 3.22.
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor |
|
|
A-34 |
|
Section 3.23.
|
|
Reorganization; Approvals |
|
|
A-34 |
|
Section 3.24.
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
A-34 |
|
Section 3.25.
|
|
State Takeover Statutes |
|
|
A-35 |
|
ARTICLE IV Representations and Warranties of Parent and Sub |
|
|
A-35 |
|
Section 4.01.
|
|
Organization, Standing and Power |
|
|
A-35 |
|
Section 4.02.
|
|
Sub; Parent Subsidiaries |
|
|
A-35 |
|
Section 4.03.
|
|
Capital Structure |
|
|
A-35 |
|
Section 4.04.
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability |
|
|
A-36 |
|
Section 4.05.
|
|
No Conflicts; Consents |
|
|
A-37 |
|
Section 4.06.
|
|
Parent SEC Documents; Parent Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities |
|
|
A-37 |
|
Section 4.07.
|
|
Information Supplied |
|
|
A-38 |
|
Section 4.08.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
A-39 |
|
Section 4.09.
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
A-39 |
|
Section 4.10.
|
|
Compliance with Applicable Laws |
|
|
A-39 |
|
Section 4.11.
|
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
A-40 |
|
Section 4.12.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
A-41 |
|
Section 4.13.
|
|
ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments |
|
|
A-42 |
|
Section 4.14.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
A-44 |
|
Section 4.15.
|
|
Real Property |
|
|
A-44 |
|
Section 4.16.
|
|
Labor Matters |
|
|
A-44 |
|
Section 4.17.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-45 |
|
Section 4.18.
|
|
Brokers Fees; Finders Fees |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Section 4.19.
|
|
Reorganization; Approvals |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Section 4.20.
|
|
Aggregate Cash Consideration |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Section 4.21.
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
A-46 |
|
|
ARTICLE V Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Section 5.01.
|
|
Conduct of Business |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Section 5.02.
|
|
No Solicitation |
|
|
A-51 |
|
|
ARTICLE VI Additional Agreements |
|
|
A-52 |
|
Section 6.01.
|
|
Preparation of the Form S-4 and the Company Proxy
Statement; Company Stockholders Meetings |
|
|
A-52 |
|
Section 6.02.
|
|
HSR Act Filing |
|
|
A-54 |
|
Section 6.03.
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality |
|
|
A-55 |
|
Section 6.04.
|
|
Reasonable Efforts; Notification |
|
|
A-56 |
|
Section 6.05.
|
|
Company Stock Options; Company RSP; Other Employee Benefits |
|
|
A-57 |
|
Section 6.06.
|
|
Indemnification; Insurance |
|
|
A-59 |
|
Section 6.07.
|
|
Fees and Expenses |
|
|
A-60 |
|
Section 6.08.
|
|
Public Announcements |
|
|
A-60 |
|
Section 6.09.
|
|
Transfer Taxes |
|
|
A-61 |
|
Section 6.10.
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
A-61 |
|
Section 6.11.
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing and Delisting |
|
|
A-61 |
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Section 6.12.
|
|
Tax Treatment |
|
|
A-61 |
|
Section 6.13.
|
|
Stockholder Litigation |
|
|
A-61 |
|
Section 6.14.
|
|
Section 16(b) |
|
|
A-61 |
|
Section 6.15.
|
|
Notice of Certain Events |
|
|
A-62 |
|
Section 6.16.
|
|
Payment of Fees |
|
|
A-62 |
|
|
ARTICLE VII Conditions Precedent |
|
|
A-62 |
|
Section 7.01.
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger |
|
|
A-62 |
|
Section 7.02.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Sub |
|
|
A-63 |
|
Section 7.03.
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Company |
|
|
A-64 |
|
Section 7.04.
|
|
Frustration of Closing Conditions |
|
|
A-65 |
|
|
ARTICLE VIII Termination, Amendment and Waiver |
|
|
A-65 |
|
Section 8.01.
|
|
Termination |
|
|
A-65 |
|
Section 8.02.
|
|
Effect of Termination |
|
|
A-66 |
|
Section 8.03.
|
|
Amendment |
|
|
A-66 |
|
Section 8.04.
|
|
Extension; Waiver |
|
|
A-66 |
|
Section 8.05.
|
|
Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver |
|
|
A-67 |
|
|
ARTICLE IX General Provisions |
|
|
A-67 |
|
Section 9.01.
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-67 |
|
Section 9.02.
|
|
Notices |
|
|
A-67 |
|
Section 9.03.
|
|
Severability |
|
|
A-68 |
|
Section 9.04.
|
|
Counterparts; Facsimile |
|
|
A-68 |
|
Section 9.05.
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries |
|
|
A-68 |
|
Section 9.06.
|
|
Governing Law |
|
|
A-69 |
|
Section 9.07.
|
|
Assignment |
|
|
A-69 |
|
Section 9.08.
|
|
Enforcement |
|
|
A-69 |
|
A-iii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER is dated as of
January 17, 2006, by and among Reliance Steel &
Aluminum Co., a California corporation
(Parent), RSAC Acquisition
Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent (Sub), and Earle M.
Jorgensen Company, a Delaware corporation (the
Company). Capitalized terms
used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned
thereto in Section 1.01.
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of Parent,
Sub and the Company have (i) approved, and declared it
advisable and in the best interests of their respective
stockholders to consummate, the merger (the
Merger) of the Company with and
into Sub on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
this Agreement, whereby each issued share of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share, of the Company
(Company Common Stock) not
owned by Parent, Sub or the Company shall be canceled and
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (as
defined in Section 2.01(c)(ii)) and
(ii) adopted this Agreement, and Parent, as the sole
stockholder of Sub, has approved this Agreement;
WHEREAS, Parent and certain stockholders of the Company
(the Principal Company
Stockholders) have concurrently entered into a
voting agreement (the Voting
Agreement) pursuant to which the Principal
Company Stockholders have agreed to take specified actions in
furtherance of the Merger;
WHEREAS, Parent and the Principal Company Stockholders
have concurrently entered into a registration rights agreement
(the Registration Rights
Agreement) pursuant to which Parent has agreed
to provide registration rights and marketing assistance with
respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock (as defined below)
that the Principal Company Stockholders will receive in the
Merger;
WHEREAS, for Federal income tax purposes it is intended
that the Merger qualify as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of
Parent, Sub and the Company is a party to a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b)
of the Code with respect to the Merger; and
WHEREAS, Parent, Sub and the Company desire to make
certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with the Merger and also to prescribe various
conditions to the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Definitions; The Merger
Section 1.01. Definitions;
Interpretations.
(a) Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the
following terms have their respective meanings specified or
referred to in this Section 1.01 and shall be
equally applicable to both
A-1
singular and plural forms. Any agreement or statute referred to
below shall mean such agreement or statute as amended,
supplemented or modified from time to time or as of a specified
date, as applicable. Any capitalized terms that are not
otherwise defined in this Section 1.01 shall have
their respective meanings as set forth in this Agreement.
Additional Employer
Contribution has the meaning specified in the
Company RSP.
An affiliate of any person
means another person that directly or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with, such first person.
Antitrust Laws means the HSR
Act and other antitrust, competition or premerger notification,
trade regulation Law or Judgment (including, without limitation,
those Laws giving rise to the need to submit the Regulatory
Filings).
business day means any day,
other than (i) a Saturday or Sunday or (ii) a day on
which banking and savings and loan institutions are authorized
or required by Law to be closed in Los Angeles, California.
CGCL means the California
General Corporation Law as in effect from time to time.
Certificate means a certificate
representing any share or shares of Company Common Stock.
Code means the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Company Board means the Board
of Directors of the Company.
Company Bylaws means the bylaws
of the Company, as amended to, and in effect as of, the date of
this Agreement.
Company Charter means the
certification of incorporation of the Company, as amended to,
and in effect as of, the date of this Agreement.
Company Common Stock means
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company.
Company Credit Agreement means
that certain Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
as of March 3, 1993, amended and restated as of
March 24, 1998, further amended and restated as of
April 12, 2002, and further amended and restated as of
March 3, 2005, by and among Holding, the Company, each of
those financial institutions listed from time to time on
Schedule I thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company), acting as
agent.
Company Financial Statements
means (i) the audited Consolidated Balance Sheets,
Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity of the Company, and the related notes thereto, as of and
for
A-2
each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, and (ii) the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet,
Consolidated Statement of Income, Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows and Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity of
the Company, and the related notes thereto, as of and for the
six-month period ended September 28, 2005, each of which is
included in the Company SEC Documents.
Company Property means Owned
Property and Leased Property of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary.
Company RSP means the Earle M.
Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan effective as of August 1,
2005.
Company Senior Debt Agreements
means (i) the Company Credit Agreement and (ii) that
certain Indenture dated as of May 22, 2002, with The Bank
of New York, a New York banking corporation, with respect to the
Companys
93/4% Senior
Secured Notes due 2012.
Company Stockholder Approval
means an approval of the Merger and the other Transactions (as
defined in Section 1.02) by the majority of the
voting power of the holders of the outstanding Company Common
Stock.
Company Stockholders
Meeting means a meeting of the stockholders of
the Company to approve the Merger and the other Transactions.
Company Subsidiaries means the
subsidiaries (including any predecessor entities) of the Company
existing on the date of this Agreement.
Company Takeover Proposal means
(i) a transaction pursuant to which any person (or group
(as defined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Act) of
persons) (other than Parent, any of the Parent Subsidiaries or
any affiliates of Parent), directly or indirectly, acquires or
would acquire more than nineteen percent (19%) of (A) the
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, (B) the voting
power of the outstanding securities of the Company or
(C) any new series or new class of preferred stock of the
Company that would be entitled to a class or series vote with
respect to the Merger, whether from the Company or pursuant to a
tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise, (ii) a merger,
share exchange, consolidation or other business combination
involving the Company (other than the Merger), (iii) any
transaction pursuant to which any person (or group of persons)
(other than Parent, any of the Parent Subsidiaries or any
affiliates of Parent) acquires or would acquire control of
assets (including for this purpose the outstanding equity
securities of the Company and securities of the entity surviving
any merger or business combination including any of the Company
Subsidiaries) of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries
representing more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the fair
market value of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of
the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
immediately prior to such transaction or (iv) any other
consolidation, business combination, recapitalization or similar
transaction involving the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries, other than the Transactions, as a result of which
(A) the holders of shares of the Company immediately prior
to such transactions do not, in the aggregate, own at least
eighty-one percent (81%) of the outstanding shares of common
stock and the outstanding voting power of the surviving or
resulting entity in such transaction immediately after the
A-3
consummation thereof in substantially the same proportion as
such holders held the shares of Company Common Stock immediately
prior the consummation thereof or (B) the individuals
comprising the Company Board prior to such transaction do not
constitute a majority of the board of the entity surviving or
resulting from such transaction or such ultimate parent entity
following the consummation of such transaction.
Confidentiality Agreement means
that certain confidentiality agreement, dated as of
October 5, 2005, by and between the Company and Parent.
Consent means any consent,
approval, license, order or authorization.
Constituent Corporations means
the Company and the Sub.
Contract means any written,
oral, implied or other agreement, contract, understanding,
arrangement, instrument, note, guaranty, indemnity,
representation, warranty, deed, assignment, power of attorney,
certificate, purchase order, work order, insurance policy,
benefit plan, commitment, covenant, assurance or undertaking of
any nature.
Credit Suisse means Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC.
DGCL means the Delaware General
Corporation Law as in effect from time to time.
Environmental Claim means any
and all administrative, regulatory or judicial actions, suits,
orders, demands, directives, claims, liens, judgments,
investigations, proceedings or written or oral notices of
noncompliance or violation by or from any person alleging
liability of whatever kind or nature (including liability or
responsibility for the costs of enforcement proceedings,
investigations, cleanup, governmental response, removal or
remediation, natural resources damages, property damages,
personal injuries, medical monitoring, penalties, contribution,
indemnification and injunctive relief) arising out of, based on
or resulting from (i) the presence or Release of, or
exposure to, any Hazardous Materials at any location or
(ii) the failure to comply with any Environmental Law.
Environmental Laws means all
applicable Federal, state, local and foreign Laws, Judgments or
Environmental Permits or any legally binding agency requirement
issued, promulgated or entered into by or with any Governmental
Entity, relating to (i) pollution, natural resources or
protection or restoration of endangered or threatened species,
human health or the environment (including ambient air, surface
water, groundwater, land surface or subsurface strata),
(ii) the handling, use, presence, disposal, release or
threatened release of any Hazardous Material or
(iii) noise, odor, indoor air, employee exposure, wetlands,
contamination or any injury or threat of injury to persons or
property as a result of any Hazardous Material.
Environmental Permits means all
Permits and Consents pursuant to Environmental Law.
ERISA means the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
A-4
Exchange Act means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
Excluded Persons means
(i) Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries and (ii) the
Principal Company Stockholders and their respective affiliates.
FTC means the Federal Trade
Commission.
GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States.
Governmental Entity means any
Federal, state, local or foreign government or any court of
competent jurisdiction, administrative agency or commission or
other governmental authority or instrumentality, domestic,
foreign or supranational.
Hazardous Materials means
(i) any petroleum or petroleum products, radioactive
materials or wastes, asbestos in any form, urea formaldehyde
foam insulation and polychlorinated biphenyls and (ii) any
other chemical, material, substance or waste that in relevant
form or concentration is prohibited, limited or regulated under
any Environmental Law.
Holding means Earle M.
Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation that
formerly was the parent company of the Company.
Holding Option Plan means the
Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc. Option Plan, effective
as of January 30, 1997, as amended, as assumed by the
Company effective as of April 20, 2005, and as may be
further amended prior to the Closing to ensure compliance with
Section 409A of the Code.
Holding Stock Options means
each option to acquire shares of Company Common Stock that was
originally granted pursuant to the Holding Option Plan and is
outstanding at the date of this Agreement, as may be further
amended prior to the Closing to ensure compliance with
Section 409A of the Code.
HSR Act means the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as
amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Intellectual Property Rights
means all patents, patent rights, trademarks, trademark rights,
trade names, trade name rights, service marks, service mark
rights, copyrights, domain names, trade secrets, know-how and
other proprietary intellectual property rights and computer
programs, including any applications or registrations related to
any of these items.
Judgment means any judgment,
order or decree.
knowledge means, (i) with
respect to the Company, the actual knowledge of the
Companys executive officers and directors and E. Gilbert
Leon and (ii) with respect to Parent, the actual knowledge
of Parents executive officers and directors.
Law means any statute, law
(including common law), ordinance, rule or regulation.
A-5
Leased Property means all real
property and interests in real property leased by (i) the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or (ii) Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary, as applicable.
Liens means pledges, liens,
charges, mortgages, encumbrances and security interests of any
kind or nature whatsoever.
Material Adverse Effect on a
person means a material adverse effect on (i) the business,
assets, financial condition or results of operations of such
person and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) the
ability of such person to perform its obligations under this
Agreement or (iii) the ability of such person to consummate
the Merger and the other Transactions to be consummated by such
person, but excluding any state of facts, event, change, effect,
development, condition or occurrence relating to (A) the
economy or financial markets in general, (B) the metal
service center industry in general, (C) national or
international political or social conditions, including the
commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war, armed
hostilities or acts of terrorism involving or affecting the
United States of America or any territory, possession or
diplomatic or consular offices thereof, or upon any military
installation thereof, (D) with respect to the Company and
Parent, the entering into by the Company of this Agreement with
Parent as opposed to any other third party, (E) with
respect to the Company and Parent, any acts or omissions by the
other Party or its respective subsidiaries or affiliates,
(F) any material change in applicable Law, (G) any
change in the NYSE trading price or volume of Company Common
Stock or Parent Common Stock, as applicable, or (H) adverse
weather conditions or natural disasters.
NYSE means the New York Stock
Exchange and any successor (including, The NYSE Group, Inc. as
currently contemplated by the pending merger between the New
York Stock Exchange and Archipelago Holdings, Inc.).
Owned Property means all real
property and interests in real property owned in fee by
(i) the Company or any Company Subsidiary or
(ii) Parent or any Parent Subsidiary, as applicable.
Parent Board means the Board of
Directors of Parent.
Parent Bylaws means the bylaws
of Parent, as amended to, and in effect as of, the date of this
Agreement.
Parent Charter means the
articles of incorporation of Parent, as amended to, and in
effect as of, the date of this Agreement.
Parent Financial Statements
means (i) the audited Consolidated Balance Sheets,
Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity of Parent, and the related notes thereto, as of and for
each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, and (ii) the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet,
Consolidated Statement of Income, Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows and Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity of
Parent, and the related notes thereto, as of and for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2005, each of which
is included in the Parent SEC Documents.
A-6
Parent Property means all Owned
Property and Leased Property of Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries.
Parent Subsidiaries means the
subsidiaries of Parent existing on the date of this Agreement
and Sub.
Participant means any current
or former employee, officer, director or independent contractor
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary who receives or has
received material benefits under the Company Benefit Plans (as
defined in Section 3.10).
Parties means Parent, Sub and
the Company.
Permits means permits,
licenses, variances, exemptions, authorizations, operating
certificates, franchises, orders and approvals of, and filings,
declarations and registrations with, all Governmental Entities.
A person means any individual,
firm, corporation, partnership, company, limited liability
company, trust, joint venture, association, Governmental Entity
or other entity.
A Release means any actual or
threatened release, spill, emission, leaking, dumping,
injection, pouring, deposit, disposal, discharge, dispersal,
leaching or migration into or through the environment (including
ambient air, surface water, groundwater, land surface or
subsurface strata) or within any building, structure, facility
or fixture.
Representatives means any
officer, director, manager or employee of, or any investment
banker, attorney, accountant or other advisor or representative
retained by, a person.
Returns means Federal, state,
local and foreign returns, information statements and reports
relating to Taxes.
SEC means the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Securities Act means the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
S/ OX means the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
A subsidiary of any person
means another person, an amount of the voting securities, other
voting ownership or voting partnership interests of which is
sufficient to elect at least a majority of its Board of
Directors or other governing body (or, if there are no such
voting interests, fifty percent (50%) or more of the equity
interests of which) is owned directly or indirectly by such
first person.
Superior Company Proposal means
any bona fide, unsolicited Company Takeover Proposal (provided
that for purposes of this definition of Superior Company
Proposal, the percentages in clauses (i), (iii) and
(iv) of the definition of Company Takeover Proposal shall
be replaced with fifty percent (50%)) made by a
third party that is not subject to a financing condition (other
than on terms substantially similar to the provisions in
Sections 4.20 and
A-7
6.04(b)) and is on terms which the Company Board
determines in good faith, after consultation with the
Companys outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to
be more favorable to the holders of Company Common Stock, from a
financial point of view, than the Merger; provided that
the Company Board shall not so determine that any such proposal
is a Superior Company Proposal prior to the time that is two
(2) business days after the time at which the Company has
complied in all material respects with
Section 5.02(c) with respect to such proposal.
Supplemental SBP means the
Earle M. Jorgensen Supplemental SBP, effective as of
March 31, 2006.
Taxes means all Federal, state,
local and foreign, taxes, assessments and other governmental
charges, duties, impositions and liabilities relating to taxes,
including taxes based upon or measured by gross receipts,
income, profits, sales, use and occupation, and value added, ad
valorem, transfer, franchise, withholding, payroll, recapture,
employment, excise and real property taxes and unclaimed
property liability, together with all interest, penalties and
additions imposed with respect to such amounts.
Tax Agreement means any
Contract to which any Party or any subsidiary of any Party is a
party under which such Party or such subsidiary could reasonably
be expected to be liable to another person under such Contract
in respect of Taxes payable by such other person to any taxing
authority or other person.
Transfer Taxes means all stock
transfer, real estate transfer, documentary, stamp, recording
and other similar Taxes (including interest, penalties and
additions to any such Taxes).
UBS means UBS Securities LLC.
Voting Company Debt means
bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of the Company
having the right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable
for, securities having the right to vote) on any matters on
which holders of Company Common Stock may vote.
Voting Parent Debt means bonds,
debentures, notes or other indebtedness of Parent having the
right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable for,
securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which
holders of Parent Common Stock may vote.
(b) Interpretations. When a reference is made in
this Agreement to an Article or Section, such reference shall be
to an Article or Section of this Agreement unless otherwise
indicated. The table of contents and headings contained herein
are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way
the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the
words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation.
Section 1.02. The
Merger. On the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the DGCL, the
Company shall be merged with and into Sub at the Effective Time
(as defined in Section 1.04). At the Effective Time,
the separate corporate existence of the Company shall cease and
Sub shall (a) continue as the surviving corporation (the
Surviving Corporation),
(b) succeed to and assume all of the rights and obligations
of the Company in accordance with the DGCL and (c) continue
its corporate
A-8
existence under the laws of the State of Delaware. The principal
executive office of the Surviving Corporation will be the
address of the Companys executive offices. The Merger, the
payment of cash in connection with the Merger, the issuance by
Parent of shares of common stock, no par value per share, of
Parent (Parent Common Stock) in
connection with the Merger (the Share
Issuance) and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and the Voting Agreement shall be
referred to herein as the
Transactions.
Section 1.03. Closing.
Subject to Section 6.01(f), the closing (the
Closing) of the Merger and the
Transactions shall take place at the offices of Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP (Los Angeles office) at 9:00 a.m., Pacific
Standard Time, on the second business day following the
satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by Law, waiver) by all
Parties of the conditions set forth in Section 7.01,
or, if on such day any condition set forth in
Section 7.02 or 7.03 has not been satisfied (or, to
the extent permitted by Law, waived by the Party or Parties
entitled to the benefits thereof), as soon as practicable after
all of the conditions set forth in Article VII have
been satisfied (or, to the extent permitted by Law, waived by
the Party or Parties entitled to the benefits thereof), or at
such other place, time and date as shall be agreed in writing
between Parent and the Company. The date on which the Closing
occurs is referred to in this Agreement as the
Closing Date.
Section 1.04. Effective
Time. Prior to the Closing, Parent shall prepare, and on
the Closing Date the Surviving Corporation shall file with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, a certificate of
merger or other appropriate documents (in any such case, the
Certificate of Merger) executed
in accordance with the relevant provisions of the DGCL and shall
make all other filings or recordings required under the DGCL.
The Merger shall become effective at such time as the
Certificate of Merger is duly filed with such Secretary of
State, or at such later time as Parent and the Company shall
agree and specify in the Certificate of Merger (the time the
Merger becomes effective being the Effective
Time).
Section 1.05. Effects.
The Merger shall have the effects set forth in Section 259
of the DGCL. In accordance with the DGCL, all of the rights,
privileges, property, powers and franchises of the Company and
Sub shall vest in the Surviving Corporation, and all of the
debts, liabilities and duties of the Company and Sub shall
become the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 1.06. Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws.
(a) At the Effective Time, the certificate of incorporation
of Sub as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the certificate of incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as provided
therein and in accordance with the DGCL. The certificate of
incorporation of the Surviving Corporation shall be amended and
restated at the Effective Time to be in the form of
Exhibit A attached hereto.
(b) At the Effective Time, the bylaws of Sub as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the bylaws of
the Surviving Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as
provided therein and in accordance with the DGCL. The bylaws of
the Surviving Corporation shall be amended at the Effective Time
so that each reference therein to Sub as the Surviving
Corporations name is changed to be the Companys name.
A-9
Section 1.07. Directors.
At the Effective Time, the directors of Sub immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be the directors of the Surviving
Corporation, until the earlier of their death, resignation or
removal or until their respective successors are duly elected
and qualified, as the case may be.
Section 1.08. Officers.
At the Effective Time, the officers of the Company immediately
prior to the Effective Time and certain officers of Parent
identified by Parent prior to the Effective Time shall be the
officers of the Surviving Corporation, until the earlier of
their death, resignation or removal or until their respective
successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified, as the
case may be.
Section 1.09. Additional
Actions. If, at any time after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall consider or be advised that
consistent with the terms of this Agreement any further
assignments or assurances in Law or any other acts are necessary
or desirable (a) to vest, perfect or confirm, of record or
otherwise, in the Surviving Corporation, title to and possession
of any property or right of any Constituent Corporation acquired
or to be acquired by reason of, or as a result of, the Merger or
(b) otherwise to carry out the purposes of this Agreement,
then, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each such Constituent Corporation and its officers and directors
shall be deemed to have granted to the Surviving Corporation an
irrevocable power of attorney to execute and deliver all such
deeds, assignments and assurances in Law and to do all acts
necessary or proper to vest, perfect or confirm title to and
possession of such property or rights in the Surviving
Corporation and otherwise to carry out the purposes of this
Agreement; and the officers and directors of the Surviving
Corporation are fully authorized in the name of any Constituent
Corporation to take any and all such action.
ARTICLE II
Effect on the Capital Stock of the
Constituent Corporations; Exchange of Certificates
Section 2.01. Effect
on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
the Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, Sub,
the Company or the holder of any shares of Company Common Stock
or any shares of capital stock of Sub:
(a) Capital Stock of Sub. Each issued and
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, of Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be
converted into one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable
share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the
Surviving Corporation, and the Surviving Corporation shall be a
wholly owned subsidiary of Parent or of a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent. Each stock certificate of Sub evidencing
ownership of any shares of common stock of Sub shall, following
the Merger, evidence ownership of the same number of shares of
common stock of the Surviving Corporation.
(b) Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Parent Owned
Stock. Each share of Company Common Stock owned by the
Company, Parent or Sub or any subsidiary of the Company or
Parent immediately prior to the Effective Time shall no longer
be outstanding and shall
A-10
automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist,
and no cash, Parent Common Stock or other consideration shall be
delivered or deliverable in exchange therefor.
(c) Conversion of Company Common Stock.
Subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 2.01(c)(iv) and other than Dissenter Shares
(as defined in Section 2.04) and fractional shares
subject to Section 2.02(e), each issued and
outstanding share of Company Common Stock held by stockholders
of the Company (other than shares cancelled pursuant to
Section 2.01(b)) shall be converted into the right
to receive:
|
|
|
(i) a fraction of a share (rounded to four (4) decimal
places) of validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Parent
Common Stock at an exchange ratio (the Exchange
Ratio) as determined in accordance with this
Section 2.01(c) (the Stock
Consideration); and |
|
|
(ii) an amount in cash equal to $6.50 (the
Cash Consideration and,
together with the Stock Consideration and any cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to be paid pursuant to
Section 2.02(e), the Merger
Consideration). |
|
|
(iii) The Exchange Ratio shall be calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
(A) If the Average Parent Stock Price (as defined below in
Section 2.01(c)(iii)(D)) is equal to or more than
$72.86 (the Upper Limit), then
the Exchange Ratio shall be 0.0892 shares of Parent Common
Stock for each share of Company Common Stock. |
|
|
(B) If the Average Parent Stock Price is less than the
Upper Limit but more than $53.86 (the Lower
Limit), then the Exchange Ratio shall be equal
to a fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock for each share
of Company Common Stock determined by dividing $6.50 by the
Average Parent Stock Price. |
|
|
(C) If the Average Parent Stock Price is equal to or less
than the Lower Limit, then the Exchange Ratio shall be
0.1207 shares of Parent Common Stock for each share of
Company Common Stock. |
|
|
(D) For purposes of this Agreement, Average
Parent Stock Price means an amount equal to
the average of the daily closing sale prices for the Parent
Common Stock on the NYSE, as reported in The Wall Street
Journal, Northeastern edition, for each of the twenty
(20) consecutive trading days ending with and including the
second (2nd) complete trading day prior to the Effective Time
(as adjusted for any reclassification, recapitalization,
subdivision, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or
readjustment of, or a stock dividend on, the Parent Common Stock
as provided in Section 2.01(c)(iv)). |
|
|
|
(iv) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, if, between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock
shall have been changed into a different number of shares or a
different class by reason of any reclassification,
recapitalization, subdivision, split-up, combination, exchange
of shares or readjustment, or a stock dividend thereon shall be |
A-11
declared with a record date within said period, the Exchange
Ratio and the Option Exchange Ratio (as defined in
Section 2.03(e)) shall be correspondingly adjusted.
|
|
|
(v) As of the Effective Time, all shares of Company Common
Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be
canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder
of a Certificate (excluding any shares of Company Common Stock
canceled pursuant to Section 2.01(b) and any
Dissenter Shares) shall cease to have any rights with respect
thereto, except the right to receive the Merger Consideration
upon surrender of such Certificate (or, in the case of a lost,
stolen or destroyed Certificate, upon delivery of an affidavit
or bond, as applicable, pursuant to Section 2.02(k))
in accordance with Section 2.02, and any Dissenter
Shares shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto,
except the right to receive Merger Consideration upon surrender
of such Certificate in accordance with Section 2.04,
without interest. |
Section 2.02. Exchange
Procedures.
(a) Exchange Agent. As soon as
practicable following the date of this Agreement and in any
event not less than three (3) days prior to dissemination
of the Company Proxy Statement (as defined in
Section 6.01(a)) to the stockholders of the Company,
Parent shall select and enter into an exchange agreement with a
bank or trust company reasonably satisfactory to the Company to
act as exchange agent (the Exchange
Agent) for payment of Merger Consideration
upon surrender of Certificates (or, in the case of lost, stolen
or destroyed Certificate, upon delivery of an affidavit or bond,
as applicable, pursuant to Section 2.02(k)). At the
Effective Time, Parent shall deposit with the Exchange Agent,
for the benefit of the holders of shares of Company Common
Stock, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II, through the Exchange Agent
(i) certificates representing the number of shares of
Parent Common Stock issuable and (ii) the amount of cash
consideration payable, in each case, pursuant to
Section 2.01(c) in exchange for outstanding shares
of Company Common Stock (such shares of Parent Common Stock and
cash, together with any dividends or distributions with respect
thereto, being hereinafter referred to as the
Exchange Fund). For the
purposes of such deposit, Parent shall assume that there will
not be any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock. Parent
shall make available to the Exchange Agent, from time to time as
needed, cash sufficient to pay cash in lieu of fractional shares
in accordance with Section 2.02(e). The Exchange
Agent shall, pursuant to irrevocable instructions, deliver the
Parent Common Stock contemplated to be issued pursuant to
Section 2.01(c) out of the Exchange Fund. The
Exchange Fund may not be used for any other purpose.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As soon as
reasonably practicable after the Effective Time, the Exchange
Agent shall mail to each holder of record of a Certificate or
Certificates that immediately prior to the Effective Time
represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock whose
shares were converted into the right to receive Merger
Consideration pursuant to Section 2.01(c),
(i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates
to the Exchange Agent and shall be in such form and have such
other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify) and
(ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Certificates in exchange for Merger Consideration. Upon
surrender of a Certificate for cancellation to the Exchange
Agent or to such other agent or agents as may be appointed by
Parent, together with
A-12
such letter of transmittal, duly executed, and such other
documents as may reasonably be required by the Exchange Agent,
the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in
exchange therefor, as promptly as practicable, the amount of
cash and the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock that
the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock
previously represented by such Certificate shall have been
converted pursuant to Section 2.01(c) into the right
to receive, and the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith
be canceled. In the event of a transfer of ownership of Company
Common Stock that is not registered in the transfer records of
the Company, payment may be made to a person other than the
person in whose name the Certificate so surrendered is
registered, if such Certificate shall be properly endorsed or
otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the person
requesting such payment shall pay any transfer or other Taxes
required by reason of the payment to a person other than the
registered holder of such Certificate or establish to the
satisfaction of Parent that such tax has been paid or is not
applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this
Section 2.02, each Certificate shall be deemed at
any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to
receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration into which
the shares of Company Common Stock theretofore represented by
such Certificate have been converted pursuant to
Section 2.01(c). No interest shall be paid or accrue
on any cash payable upon surrender of any Certificate.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions with respect
to Parent Common Stock with a record date on or after the
Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any Certificate
formerly representing Company Common Stock with respect to the
shares of Parent Common Stock issuable upon surrender thereof,
and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares shall be paid
to any such holder pursuant to Section 2.02(e) until
the surrender of such Certificate in accordance with this
Article II. Subject to applicable Law, following
surrender of any such Certificate, there shall be paid to the
holder of the Certificate representing whole shares of Parent
Common Stock issued in exchange therefor, without interest,
(i) at the time of such surrender, the amount of any cash
payable in lieu of a fractional share of Parent Common Stock to
which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) and the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time
theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the
amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date
after the Effective Time but prior to such surrender and a
payment date subsequent to such surrender payable with respect
to such whole shares of Parent Common Stock.
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. The Merger Consideration paid (and issued) in
accordance with the terms of this Article II upon
conversion of any shares of Company Common Stock shall be deemed
to have been paid (and issued) in full satisfaction of all
rights pertaining to such shares of Company Common Stock,
subject, however, to the Surviving Corporations obligation
to pay any dividends or make any other distributions with a
record date prior to the Effective Time that may have been
declared or made by the Company on such shares of Company Common
Stock in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or prior to
the date of this Agreement and which remain unpaid at the
Effective Time; provided that the Company has deposited
the funds to pay such dividend or distribution with its transfer
agent prior to the Closing, and after the Effective Time there
shall be no further registration of transfers on the stock
transfer books of the Surviving Corporation of shares of Company
Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time. If,
A-13
after the Effective Time, any Certificates formerly representing
shares of Company Common Stock are presented to the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent for any reason, they shall be
canceled and exchanged as provided in this
Article II.
(e) No Fractional Shares.
|
|
|
(i) No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares
of Parent Common Stock shall be issued upon the conversion of
Company Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.01(c),
and such fractional share interests shall not entitle the owner
thereof to vote or to any rights of a holder of Parent Common
Stock. For purposes of this Section 2.02(e), all
fractional shares to which a single record holder would be
entitled shall be aggregated and calculations shall be rounded
to three (3) decimal places. |
|
|
(ii) In lieu of any such fractional shares, each holder of
Company Common Stock who would otherwise be entitled to such
fractional shares shall be entitled to an amount in cash,
without interest, rounded to the nearest cent, equal to the
product of (A) the amount of the fractional share interest
in a share of Parent Common Stock to which such holder is
entitled under Section 2.01(c) (or would be entitled
but for this Section 2.02(e)) and (B) the
Average Parent Stock Price. |
(f) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the
Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the holders of
Company Common Stock for six (6) months after the Effective
Time shall be delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holder
of Company Common Stock who has not theretofore complied with
this Article II shall thereafter look only to Parent
and the Surviving Corporation for payment of its claim for
Merger Consideration and any applicable dividends or
distributions with respect to any Parent Common Stock
constituting Merger Consideration as provided in
Section 2.02(c).
(g) No Liability. None of Parent, Sub, the Company
or the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any person in respect
of any cash or any shares of Parent Common Stock (or dividends
or distributions with respect thereto) delivered to a public
official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat
or similar Law. If any Certificate has not been surrendered
prior to five (5) years after the Effective Time (or
immediately prior to such earlier date on which Merger
Consideration in respect of such Certificate would otherwise
escheat to or become the property of any Governmental Entity),
any such cash, shares, dividends or distributions in respect of
such Certificate shall, to the extent permitted by applicable
Law, become the property of the Surviving Corporation, free and
clear of all claims or interest of any person previously
entitled thereto.
(h) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Exchange Agent
shall invest any cash included in the Exchange Fund, as directed
by Parent, on a daily basis; provided, however, that all
such investments shall be in (i) obligations of, or
guaranteed by, the United States of America,
(ii) commercial paper obligations receiving the highest
rating from either Moodys Investors Services, Inc. or
Standard and Poors Corporation or (iii) certificates
of deposit of commercial banks with capital exceeding
$1,000,000,000. Any interest and other income resulting from
such investments shall be paid to Parent.
A-14
(i) Withholding Rights. Parent shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable to
any holder of Company Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement
such amounts as may be required to be deducted and withheld with
respect to the making of such payment under the Code, or under
any provision of state, local or foreign tax Law. To the extent
that amounts are so withheld and paid over to the appropriate
Taxing authority, the Surviving Corporation will be treated as
though it withheld an appropriate amount of the type of
consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to
any holder of Company Common Stock, sold such consideration for
an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of such
consideration at the time of such deemed sale and paid such cash
proceeds to the appropriate Taxing authority.
(j) Income Tax Treatment. It is intended by the
Parties that the Merger qualify as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. The
Parties hereby adopt this Agreement as a plan of
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 1.368-2(g) of the U.S. Treasury Regulations
promulgated under the Code.
(k) Lost Stock Certificates. If any Certificate
representing Company Common Stock shall have been lost, stolen
or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by
the person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or
destroyed and, if required by the Surviving Corporation, the
posting by such person of a bond in such reasonable amount as
the Surviving Corporation may direct as indemnity against any
claim that may be made against it with respect to such
Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the Merger Consideration,
pursuant to this Article II.
(l) Transfer Taxes on Surrendered Certificates. If
any cash is to be remitted to a person (other than the person in
whose name any Certificate representing Company Common Stock
surrendered in exchange therefor is registered), it shall be a
condition of such exchange that such Certificate shall be
properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer and
that the person requesting such exchange shall pay to the
Exchange Agent any transfer or other Taxes required by reason of
the payment of the Merger Consideration to a person other than
the registered holder of such Certificate, or shall establish to
the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such Tax either has
been paid or is not applicable.
(m) Affiliates. Notwithstanding anything herein to
the contrary, any Certificate representing Company Common Stock
surrendered for exchange by any affiliate (as
determined pursuant to Section 6.10) of the Company
shall not be exchanged until Parent has received a written
agreement from such person as provided in
Section 6.10.
Section 2.03. Company
Stock Options; Holding Stock Options.
(a) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of the holders thereof,
(i) each option to purchase shares of Company Common Stock
(other than the Holding Stock Options) that (A) was granted
pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Company 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan (the Company Option Plan)
and (B) is outstanding at the Effective Time (the
Company Stock Options) shall
(1) cease to represent a right to acquire shares of Company
Common Stock, and (2) shall be converted automatically into
options to purchase, on the same terms and conditions mutatis
mutandis as were applicable to such options prior to the
A-15
Effective Time, shares of Parent Common Stock (each such option
an Adjusted Option), and
(ii) Parent shall assume all of the obligations of the
Company under the Company Option Plan, with respect to each
outstanding Adjusted Option and the agreements evidencing the
grants thereof; provided, however, that from and after
the Effective Time, (x) the number of shares of Parent
Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of such Adjusted Option
shall be equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock
that were purchasable under the applicable Company Stock Option
immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Option
Exchange Ratio, and (y) the per share exercise price under
each such Adjusted Option shall be equal to the price obtained
by dividing the per share exercise price of each such Company
Stock Option by the Option Exchange Ratio; provided,
however, that, in the case of any Company Stock Option, the
exercise price and the number of shares of Parent Common Stock
subject to such option shall be determined in a manner
consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the
Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares and
the per share exercise price of each Adjusted Option shall be
adjusted in accordance with the requirements of Section 424
of the Code. Accordingly, with respect to any stock options,
fractional shares shall be rounded down to the nearest whole
number of shares and where necessary the per share exercise
price shall be rounded up to the nearest cent.
(b) As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Parent
shall deliver to the holders of Adjusted Options appropriate
notices setting forth such holders rights pursuant to the
Company Option Plan and indicating that the agreements
evidencing the grants of such Adjusted Options shall continue in
effect on the same terms and conditions (subject to the
adjustments required by this Section 2.03 after
giving effect to the Merger). Parent shall comply with the terms
of the Company Option Plan and ensure, to the extent required
by, and subject to the provisions of, the Company Option Plan,
that the Company Stock Options, which qualify as incentive
stock options at the Effective Time, continue to qualify
as incentive stock options after the Effective Time.
(c) Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall reserve for
issuance the number of shares of Parent Common Stock necessary
to satisfy Parents obligations under
Section 2.03(a). Promptly after the Effective Time,
Parent shall file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-8 or such
other appropriate form or a post-effective amendment to a
previously filed registration statement under the Securities Act
with respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock subject to
options to acquire Parent Common Stock issued or issuable
pursuant to Section 2.03(a), shall file with the
NYSE an amendment to its listing application covering the
issuance and shall use its best efforts to maintain the current
status of the prospectus contained, or incorporated by
reference, in such registration statement, as well as comply
with any applicable listing requirements of the NYSE and state
securities or blue sky laws, for so long as such
options remain outstanding.
(d) At the Effective Time, each outstanding Holding Stock
Option shall be exchanged for the right to receive an amount, if
any, equal to (i) the difference between (x) $13.00
and (y) the applicable per share exercise price, multiplied
by (ii) the number of shares of Company Common Stock
subject to such Holding Stock Option, and subject to any
applicable withholding of Taxes.
A-16
(e) For purposes of this Agreement, the
Option Exchange Ratio shall
mean the Exchange Ratio multiplied by two (2).
Section 2.04. Dissenter
Rights. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to
the contrary, shares (Dissenter
Shares) of Company Common Stock that are
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and that are
held by any person who is entitled to demand and properly
demands payment for such Dissenter Shares pursuant to, and who
complies in all respects with, Section 262 of the DGCL (the
Dissenter Rights) shall not be
converted into Merger Consideration as provided in
Section 2.01(c), but rather the holders of Dissenter
Shares shall be entitled to payment for such Dissenter Shares in
accordance with the Dissenter Rights; provided, however,
that if any such holder shall fail to perfect or otherwise shall
waive, withdraw or lose the right to receive payment under the
Dissenter Rights, then the right of such holder to be paid in
accordance with the Dissenter Rights shall cease and such
Dissenter Shares shall be deemed to have been converted as of
the Effective Time into, and to have become exchangeable solely
for the right to receive, Merger Consideration as provided in
Section 2.01(c). The Company shall serve prompt
notice to Parent of any written notice of intent to demand
payment, or any written demand for payment, received by the
Company in respect of any shares of Company Common Stock, and
Parent shall have the right to participate in and direct all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands. Prior
to the Effective Time, the Company shall not, without the prior
written consent of Parent, make any payment with respect to, or
settle or offer to settle, any such demands, or agree to do any
of the foregoing.
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties of the Company
Except as (i) expressly set forth in the corresponding
section of that certain letter, dated as of the date of this
Agreement, from the Company to Parent and Sub (the
Company Disclosure Letter), it
being understood that disclosure of any matters under any
section of the Company Disclosure Letter shall be deemed to be
disclosure of any other section of the Company Disclosure Letter
to which the matter may reasonably apply, notwithstanding the
omission of an appropriate cross reference to such other
section, (ii) disclosed in any Company SEC Document (as
defined in Section 3.06) or (iii) expressly
contemplated or permitted under this Agreement and any agreement
contemplated hereby or in connection with the consummation of
the Transactions, the Company represents and warrants to Parent
and Sub that:
Section 3.01. Organization,
Standing and Power. Each of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries is duly organized or formed, validly existing and
in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it
is organized and has full power and authority to conduct its
businesses as presently conducted. Each of the Company and its
Company Subsidiaries is duly qualified to do business in each
jurisdiction where the nature of its business or the ownership
or leasing of its properties make such qualification necessary
or the failure to so qualify, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect. The Company has delivered or made
available to Parent true and complete copies of the Company
Charter, the Company Bylaws and the comparable charter and
organizational documents of each Company Subsidiary, in each
case as amended to the date of this Agreement.
A-17
Section 3.02. Company
Subsidiaries; Equity Interests.
(a) Section 3.02(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter lists each of the Company Subsidiaries and the number of
authorized and outstanding shares of capital stock or membership
interests, as the case may be, for each Company Subsidiary. All
of the outstanding equity interests of the Company Subsidiaries
have been validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable
and are owned by the Company, free and clear of all Liens.
(b) Except for its interests in the Company Subsidiaries,
the Company does not own, directly or indirectly, any capital
stock, membership interest, partnership interest, joint venture
interest or other equity interest in any person.
Section 3.03. Capital
Structure.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of
Eighty Million (80,000,000) shares of Company Common Stock and
Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share. At the close of business on
January 16, 2006, (i) 50,237,094 shares of
Company Common Stock were issued and outstanding, (ii) no
shares of Company Common Stock were held by the Company in its
treasury and (iii) 808,000 shares of Company Common
Stock were subject to outstanding Company Stock Options and
3,053,668 shares of Company Common Stock were subject to
outstanding Holding Stock Options. The Company has reserved
(A) 1,617,856 additional shares of Company Common Stock for
issuance under the Company Option Plan, (B) no additional
shares of Company Common Stock for issuance in connection with
the Holding Option Plan, and (C) 727,984 additional shares
of Company Common Stock for issuance to the Company RSP pursuant
to the terms of the Company RSP, and the Company is obligated to
contribute 723,109 additional shares of Company Common Stock to
the Company RSP pursuant to the terms of the Company RSP. As of
the date hereof, except as set forth above, at the close of
business on January 16, 2006, no shares of capital stock or
other voting securities of the Company were issued, reserved for
issuance or outstanding, and since July 8, 2005, no shares
of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company have
been issued by the Company. All outstanding shares of Company
Common Stock are, and all such shares that may be issued prior
to the Effective Time will be when issued, duly authorized,
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to
or issued in violation of any purchase option, call option,
right of first refusal, preemptive right, subscription right or
any similar right under any provision of the DGCL, the Company
Charter, the Company Bylaws or any Contract to which the Company
is a party or otherwise bound. There is not any Voting Company
Debt. Except as set forth above, as of the date of this
Agreement, there are not any options, warrants, rights,
convertible or exchangeable securities, phantom
stock rights, stock appreciation rights, stock-based performance
units, commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of
any kind to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a
party or by which any of them is bound (x) obligating the
Company or any Company Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or
cause to be issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of
capital stock or other equity interests in, or any security
convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital
stock of or other equity interest in, the Company or any Company
Subsidiary or any Voting Company Debt, (y) obligating the
Company or any Company Subsidiary to issue, grant, extend or
enter into any such option, warrant, call, right, security,
commitment, Contract, arrangement or undertaking or
(z) that give any person the right
A-18
to receive any economic benefit or right similar to or derived
from the economic benefits and rights accruing to holders of
Company Common Stock. As of the date of this Agreement, there
are not any outstanding contractual obligations of the Company
or any Company Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire any shares of capital stock of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary.
(b) Section 3.03(b) of the Company Disclosure
Letter sets forth a true, complete and correct list of all
outstanding Company Stock Options and Holding Stock Options, the
number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to each such
Company Stock Option and each such Holding Stock Option, the
grant dates, the exercise prices, expiration dates and vesting
schedules of such Company Stock Options and such Holding Stock
Options and the names of the holders of each Company Stock
Option and each Holding Stock Option. All outstanding Company
Stock Options and Holding Stock Options are evidenced by the
option agreements in the forms set forth in
Section 3.03(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter.
Each Company Stock Option intended to qualify as an
incentive stock option under Section 422 of the
Code so qualifies and the exercise price of each other Company
Stock Option is not less than the fair market value of a share
of Company Common Stock as determined on the date of grant of
such Company Stock Option.
(c) Listings. The Company Common Stock is listed for
trading on the NYSE. Except as set forth in the preceding
sentence, the Companys securities are not listed or
quoted, for trading on any U.S. domestic or foreign
securities exchange.
Section 3.04. Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability.
(a) The Company has all requisite corporate power and
authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to
consummate the Merger and the other Transactions to be performed
or consummated by the Company in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement. The execution and delivery by the Company of
this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the Merger
and the other Transactions to be performed or consummated by the
Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement have been
duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of
the Company, subject, in the case of the Merger, to receipt of
the Company Stockholder Approval. The Company has duly executed
and delivered this Agreement, and, assuming due authorization,
execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Sub, this
Agreement constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation,
enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject to
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or
other laws relating to or affecting the rights and remedies of
creditors generally and to general principles of equity
(regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or
at law).
(b) The Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held,
by a unanimous vote of the directors,] duly adopted resolutions
(i) adopting this Agreement and approving the Merger and
the other Transactions to be performed or consummated by the
Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement,
(ii) determining that the terms of the Merger and the other
Transactions to be performed or consummated by the Company in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement are fair to and in
the best interests of the Company and its stockholders,
(iii)
A-19
directing that this Agreement be submitted to a vote at the
Company Stockholders Meeting and (iv) recommending
that the Companys stockholders approve this Agreement.
(c) The only vote of holders of any class or series of the
capital stock of the Company necessary to approve this Agreement
and the Merger is the approval of this Agreement by the Company
Stockholder Approval. The affirmative vote of the holders of
Company Common Stock, or any of them, is not necessary to
consummate any Transaction to be performed or consummated by the
Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement other
than the Merger.
Section 3.05. No
Conflicts; Consents.
(a) The execution and delivery by the Company of this
Agreement do not, and the consummation by the Company of the
Merger and the other Transactions to be performed or consummated
by the Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
and compliance by the Company with the terms hereof will not,
conflict with, or result in any violation of or default (with or
without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to
a right of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any
obligation or to loss of a material benefit under, or to
increased, additional, accelerated or guaranteed rights or
entitlements of any person under, or result in the creation of
any Lien upon any of the properties or assets of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary under, any provision of (i) the
Company Charter, the Company Bylaws or the comparable charter
and organizational documents of each Company Subsidiary,
(ii) any Contract to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party or by which any of their respective
properties or assets is bound or (iii) subject to the
filings and other matters referred to in
Section 3.05(b), any Judgment or Law applicable to
the Company or any Company Subsidiary or their respective
properties or assets, other than, in the case of
clauses (ii) and (iii) above, any such items that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) No Consent of, or Permit from, any Governmental Entity
is required to be obtained or made by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary in connection with the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger
and the other Transactions to be performed or consummated by the
Company in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, other
than (i) compliance with and filings under the HSR Act and
any other Antitrust Law and, if applicable, any state takeover
statute, (ii) the filing with the SEC of (A) the
Company Proxy Statement and (B) such reports under, or
other applicable requirements of, the Exchange Act, as may be
required in connection with this Agreement, the Merger and the
other Transactions to be performed or consummated by the Company
in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, (iii) the
filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware and appropriate documents with the
relevant authorities of the other jurisdictions in which the
Company is qualified to do business, (iv) compliance with
and such filings as may be required under applicable
Environmental Laws, (v) such filings as may be required in
connection with the Taxes described in Section 6.09,
(vi) such filings required by the Companies Act 1981, the
Insurance Act 1978 and the Exchange Control Act 1972, each as
amended, and any other applicable Bermuda Law,
(vii) compliance with and such filings as may be required
by the Investment Canada Act, the Competition Act and any other
applicable Canadian Law and (viii) such other items that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not had and would not
A-20
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect
(collectively, the Regulatory
Filings).
Section 3.06. Company
SEC Documents; Company Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities.
(a) The Company has filed or furnished all reports,
schedules, forms, statements and other documents required to be
filed or furnished by the Company with the SEC since
March 31, 2003 pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Exchange Act (collectively, the Company SEC
Documents). No Company Subsidiary is required
to file any report, schedule, form, statement or other document
with the SEC.
(b) As of the date that it was filed with the SEC,
(i) each Company SEC Document complied in all material
respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to
such Company SEC Document, (ii) each registration statement
and prospectus included therein (the Company
Registration Documents) that was filed by the
Company since March 31, 2003 complied in all material
respects with the requirements of the Securities Act applicable
to such Company Registration Document and (iii) none of the
foregoing contained any untrue statement of a material fact or
omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Except to the extent that information contained in any Company
SEC Document has been revised or superseded by a later filed
Company SEC Document, none of the Company SEC Documents contains
any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(c) The consolidated financial statements of the Company
(including any notes and schedules thereto) included in the
Company SEC Documents (i) complied as of their respective
dates as to form in all material respects with all applicable
accounting requirements and the published rules and regulations
of the SEC with respect thereto as in effect on the date of
filing and effectiveness thereof, (ii) were prepared in
conformity with GAAP as in effect as of the dates of such
financial statements, applied on a consistent basis (except as
may be indicated therein or in the notes thereto and, in the
case of unaudited statements, as permitted by the rules and
regulations of the SEC and disclosed to Parent) during the
periods involved and (iii) fairly present, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company and
its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the
consolidated statements of their operations and cash flows for
the periods therein indicated (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments that were not
material in amount). There has been no change in the
Companys accounting policies except as disclosed in the
Company SEC Documents.
(d) Except (i) as set forth, reflected or reserved
against in the consolidated balance sheet (including the notes
thereto) of the Company as of March 31, 2005 included in
its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, (ii) as set forth,
reflected or reserved against in any consolidated balance sheet
(including the notes thereto) of the Company included in any
other Company SEC Document filed with the SEC after the filing
date of such Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 and prior to the date
A-21
hereof, (iii) for liabilities and obligations incurred
since September 29, 2005 in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, or not otherwise prohibited
pursuant to this Agreement or (iv) for liabilities and
obligations incurred in connection with the Merger or any other
Transaction or any other agreement contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the Company nor any of the Company
Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature
(whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) except for
such liabilities and obligations which, individually or in the
aggregate, would not have a Company Material Adverse Effect, and
no significant Company Subsidiary (determined in accordance with
Regulation S-X
promulgated under the Securities Act) has any liabilities or
obligations of any nature (whether accrued, absolute, contingent
or otherwise) except for such liabilities and obligations which,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Material
Adverse Effect on that Company Subsidiary individually.
Section 3.06(d) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth all liabilities and obligations incurred in
connection with the Merger and the other agreements contemplated
by this Agreement and the other Transactions.
Section 3.07. Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or to be
supplied by the Company for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (a) the registration statement on
Form S-4 to be
filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the Share
Issuance (the
Form S-4)
will, at the time the
Form S-4 is filed
with the SEC, at any time it is amended or supplemented or at
the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein not misleading, or (b) the Company
Proxy Statement will, at the date it is first mailed to the
Companys stockholders or at the time of the Company
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading. The Company Proxy Statement will comply as
to form in all material respects with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, except
that no representation is made by the Company with respect to
statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on
information supplied by Parent or Sub in writing for inclusion
or incorporation by reference therein.
Section 3.08. Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Other than in connection
with or arising out of this Agreement, the Transactions and the
other agreements contemplated hereby, from the date of the most
recent audited financial statements included in the Company SEC
Documents to the date of this Agreement, the Company has
conducted its business only in the ordinary course, and during
such period there has not been:
|
|
|
(a) any state of facts, event, change, effect, development,
condition or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect; |
|
|
(b) any declaration, setting aside or payment of any
dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or
property) with respect to any Company Common Stock or any
repurchase for value by the Company of any Company Common Stock; |
A-22
|
|
|
(c) any split, combination or reclassification of any
Company Common Stock or any issuance or the authorization of any
issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for shares of Company Common Stock; |
|
|
(d) (i) any granting by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to any Participant of any loan or any increase in
compensation, benefits, perquisites or any bonus or award,
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with prior
practice or (ii) any granting by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to any such Participant of any increase in severance,
change in control or termination pay or benefits, in each case,
except as was required under any employment, severance or
termination agreements in effect as of the date of the most
recent audited financial statements included in the Company SEC
Documents; |
|
|
(e) any damage, destruction or loss, whether or not covered
by insurance, that individually or in the aggregate has had or
would reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect; |
|
|
(f) any change in accounting methods, principles or
practices by the Company or any Company Subsidiary, except
insofar as may have been required by a change in GAAP; |
|
|
(g) any sale, lease, transfer or assignment by the Company
or any Company Subsidiary of any material assets, tangible or
intangible, other than for a fair consideration in the ordinary
course of business and other than the disposition of obsolete or
unusable property; |
|
|
(h) any acceleration of the collection of accounts
receivable or deferring payment of liabilities that could
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect; or |
|
|
(i) a binding commitment by the Company or any Company
Subsidiaries relating to any of the foregoing. |
Section 3.09. Taxes.
(a) The Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries
(including, for purposes of this representation, Holding) has
timely filed all Returns required by applicable Tax law to be
filed by the Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries. All
Taxes owed by the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries
(including, for the purposes of this representation, Holding) to
a taxing authority, as of the date hereof, have been paid and,
as of the Effective Time, will have been paid. The Company has
made accruals for Taxes on the Company Financial Statements
which are adequate to cover any Tax liability of the Company and
each of the Company Subsidiaries determined in accordance with
GAAP through the date of the Company Financial Statements.
(b) The Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries have
withheld with respect to its employees all Federal and state
income taxes and all other Taxes required to be withheld
(including, without limitation, under Sections 1441, 1442,
3101, 3111 and 3402 of the Code or similar provisions under all
applicable Laws).
A-23
(c) There is no Tax deficiency outstanding, proposed or
assessed against the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries
for which accruals have not been made on the Company Financial
Statements. Neither the Company nor any of the Company
Subsidiaries has executed or requested any waiver of any statute
of limitations on or extending the period for the assessment or
collection of any Federal or material state Tax that is still in
effect.
(d) No Tax audit or other examination of the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries is presently in progress, nor has
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries been notified in
writing of any request for such Tax audit or other examination.
(e) Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
is a party to (i) any agreement with a party other than the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries providing for the
allocation or payment of Tax liabilities or payment for Tax
benefits with respect to a consolidated, combined or unitary
Return which Return includes or included the Company or any
Company Subsidiary or (ii) any Tax Agreement other than any
Tax Agreement described in the foregoing clause (i).
(f) Except for the group of which the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries are now presently members, neither the
Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has ever been a
member of an affiliated group of corporations within the meaning
of Section 1504 of the Code.
(g) The Company is not, and has not at any time been, a
United States Real Property Holding Corporation
within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Code.
(h) The Company has not been a distributing
corporation within the meaning of
Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code within the past two
(2) years.
(i) No material claim has ever been made by any
Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries does not file Tax returns that it is
or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction, and neither
the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has received any
notice of any such material claim from any such authority.
Section 3.10. Absence
of Changes in Benefit Plans. From March 31, 2005 to
the date of this Agreement, neither the Company nor any Company
Subsidiary (a) has terminated, adopted, amended, modified
or agreed to amend or modify (or announced an intention to amend
or modify) any collective bargaining agreement or any bonus,
pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation, incentive
compensation, stock ownership, stock purchase, stock
appreciation, restricted stock, stock option, phantom stock,
performance, retirement, thrift, savings, stock bonus,
cafeteria, paid time off, perquisite, fringe benefit, vacation,
severance, disability, death benefit, hospitalization, medical
or other welfare benefit or other plan, program, arrangement or
understanding, whether oral or written, formal or informal,
funded or unfunded (whether or not legally binding) maintained,
contributed to or required to be maintained or contributed to by
the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any other person or
entity that, together with the Company or any Company
Subsidiary, is treated as a single employer under
Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code
(each, a Commonly Controlled
Entity), in each case providing material
A-24
benefits to any Participant (collectively,
Company Benefit Plans) or
(b) has made any change in any actuarial or other
assumption used to calculate funding obligations with respect to
any Company Benefit Plan that is a Company Pension Plan (as
defined in Section 3.11(a)), or any change in the
manner in which contributions to any such Company Pension Plan
are made or the basis on which such contributions are
determined, other than changes made pursuant to any collective
bargaining agreement to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party; provided, however, that the
representation contained in clauses (a) and (b) of
this Section 3.10 shall only apply to items which
the Company reasonably believes would result in a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Since March 31, 2005, the Company
has not adopted, amended, modified or agreed to amend or modify
(or announced an intention to amend or modify) any Company
Benefit Plan so as to accelerate the vesting of any Company
Stock Option or Holding Stock Option or materially change the
terms or conditions thereof.
Section 3.11. ERISA
Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments.
(a) Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter contains a list of all Company Benefit Plans. Each
Company Benefit Plan (other than Company Multiemployer Pension
Plans (as defined in Section 3.11(c)), has been
administered in material compliance with its terms, applicable
Law and the terms of any applicable collective bargaining
agreements. The Company has made available to Parent true,
complete and correct copies of (i) each Company Benefit
Plan (or, in the case of any unwritten Company Benefit Plans,
written descriptions thereof), (ii) the most recent annual
report required to be filed, or such similar report, statement,
information returns or material correspondence filed with or
delivered to any Governmental Entity during the past year, with
respect to each Company Benefit Plan (other than Company
Multiemployer Pension Plans) including reports filed on
Form 5500 with accompanying schedules and attachments,
(iii) the most recent summary plan description prepared for
each Company Benefit Plan (other than Company Multiemployer
Pension Plans), (iv) each currently effective trust
agreement and group annuity contract and other documents
relating to the funding or payment of benefits under any Company
Benefit Plan (other than Company Multiemployer Pension Plans),
(v) the most recent determination or qualification letter
issued by any Governmental Entity for each Company Benefit Plan
(other than Company Multiemployer Pension Plans) intended to
qualify for favorable tax treatment, as well as a true, correct
and complete copy of each pending application for a
determination letter, if applicable, and (vi) the most
recent actuarial valuation for each Company Benefit Plan (other
than Company Multiemployer Pension Plans) subject to
Title IV of ERISA. All Participant data necessary to
administer each Company Benefit Plan, other than any Company
Benefit Plan that is a Company Multiemployer Pension Plan, is in
the possession of the Company or its service providers and is in
a form that is sufficient for the proper administration of such
Company Benefit Plans in accordance with their terms and all
applicable Laws and such data is true, complete and correct in
all material respects. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Company Pension Plan shall mean
any Company Benefit Plan which is subject to Title IV of
ERISA.
(b) All Company Benefit Plans (other than Company
Multiemployer Pension Plans) which are intended to be qualified
under Section 401(a) of the Code have been the subject of a
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service to the
effect that the form of each such Company Benefit Plan is
qualified and exempt from Federal income Taxes under
Sections 401(a) and 501(a), respectively, of the Code, and
satisfy the requirements for statutory changes
A-25
required by the legislation commonly known as GUST
and each Company Benefit Plan has been amended to comply with
statutory changes required by the legislation commonly known as
EGTRRA, and no such determination letter has been
revoked nor, to the knowledge of the Company, has revocation
been threatened, nor has any such Company Benefit Plan been
amended since the date of its most recent determination letter
or application therefor in any respect that would adversely
affect its qualification or materially increase its costs or
require security under Section 307 of ERISA.
(c) During the past three (3) years (i) neither
the Company nor any Commonly Controlled Entity has maintained,
contributed to or been obligated to maintain or contribute to,
or has any actual or contingent liability under, any Company
Pension Plan, other than any Company Pension Plan that is a
multiemployer plan within the meaning of
Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA (a Company
Multiemployer Pension Plan), (ii) there
have been no non-exempt prohibited transactions (as
such term is defined in Section 406 of ERISA or
Section 4975 of the Code) with respect to any Company
Benefit Plan that is subject to ERISA or any other breach of
fiduciary responsibility that could reasonably be expected to
subject the Company, any Company Subsidiary or any officer of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any of the Company
Benefit Plans which are subject to ERISA, or, to the knowledge
of the Company, any trusts created thereunder or any trustee or
administrator thereof to the tax or penalty on prohibited
transactions imposed by such Section 4975 or to any
liability under Section 502(i) or 502(1) of ERISA or to any
other liability for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA or any
other applicable Law, (iii) no Company Pension Plan or
related trust has been terminated and (iv) (A) neither
the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has incurred any
liability that remains unsatisfied with respect to a
complete withdrawal or a partial
withdrawal (as such terms are defined in
Sections 4203 and 4205, respectively, of ERISA) since the
effective date of such Sections 4203 and 4205 with respect
to any Company Multiemployer Pension Plan, (B) no such
liability has been asserted, (C) there are no events or
circumstances known by the Company that would result in any such
complete withdrawal or partial withdrawal and (D) neither
the Company nor any Commonly Controlled Entity of the Company is
bound by any Contract or has any liabilities described in ERISA
Section 4204; provided, however, that the
representation contained in clauses (i) through
(iv) of this Section 3.11(c) shall only apply
to items which the Company reasonably believes would result in a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
(d) With respect to any Company Benefit Plan that is a
welfare plan (as defined in Section 3(1) of
ERISA), whether or not subject to ERISA, (i) no such
Company Benefit Plan is funded through a welfare benefits
fund (as such term is defined in Section 419(e) of
the Code), (ii) each such Company Benefit Plan that is a
group health plan (as such term is defined in
Section 5000(b)(1) of the Code), complies, in all material
respects, with the applicable requirements of
Section 4980B(f) of the Code or any similar applicable
state statute, (iii) no such Company Benefit Plan provides
benefits after termination of employment, except where the cost
thereof is borne entirely by the former employee (or his
eligible dependents or beneficiaries) or as required by
Section 4980B(f) of the Code or any similar applicable
state statute and (iv) each such Company Benefit Plan
(including any such Plan covering retirees or other former
employees) may be amended or terminated without material
liability to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries on or at
any time after the Effective Time (except for expenses related
to termination of any such plan and paying any final claims
related thereto). No Company Benefit Plan that is a welfare plan
is self-insured.
A-26
(e) No amount or other entitlement that could be received
(whether in cash or property or the vesting of property) as a
result of any of the transactions contemplated hereby (alone or
in combination with any other event) by any Participant who is a
disqualified individual (as such term is defined in
final Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1) (each, a
Disqualified Individual) under
any Company Benefit Plan, will cause the excise tax required by
Section 4999(a) of the Code to be imposed on such
Disqualified Individual. Section 3.11(e) of the
Company Disclosure Letter lists all amounts that may be required
to be paid by the Company to any of its employees as a result of
the consummation of the Transactions in respect of severance
payments for termination of employment or payments that may
become due under any change of control or retention agreement.
(f) The execution and delivery by the Company of this
Agreement do not, and the consummation of the Transactions and
compliance with the terms hereof will not (either alone or in
combination with any other event), (i) entitle any
Participant to any additional compensation, severance or other
benefits, (ii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting or
trigger any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or
otherwise) of compensation or benefits under, increase the
amount payable or trigger any other material obligation pursuant
to, any Company Benefit Plan, or (iii) result in any breach
or violation of, or a default (with or without notice or lapse
of time or both) under, any Company Benefit Plan.
(g) Except as could not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect, since March 31, 2005, and
through the date of this Agreement, neither the Company nor any
Company Subsidiary has received notice of, and, to the knowledge
of the Company, there are no (i) material pending
termination proceedings or other suits, claims (except claims
for benefits payable in the normal operation of the Company
Benefit Plans), actions or proceedings against or involving or
asserting any rights or claims to benefits under any Company
Benefit Plan (other than a Company Benefit Plan which is a
Company Multiemployer Pension Plan), or (ii) pending
investigations (other than routine inquiries) by any
Governmental Entity with respect to any Company Benefit Plan
(other than a Company Benefit Plan which is a Company
Multiemployer Benefit Plan). Except as could not reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, all
contributions, premiums and benefit payments under or in
connection with the Company Benefit Plans that are required to
have been made by the Company or any Company Subsidiary have
been timely made, accrued or reserved for in all material
respects.
(h) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has any
material liability or obligations, including under or on account
of a Company Benefit Plan, arising out of the hiring of persons
to provide services to the Company or any Company Subsidiary and
treating such persons as consultants or independent contractors
and not as employees of the Company or any Company Subsidiary.
(i) The Company has no legally binding plan or commitment
to create any additional Company Benefit Plan or modify or
change any existing Company Benefit Plan that would be
reasonably expected to result in material liabilities to the
Company, except as may be required by applicable Law. To the
extent that any such plan or commitment exists, whether or not
expected to result in material liability to the Company, the
Company has provided a copy of such plan or commitment to Parent.
A-27
(j) No employee, director or consultant is or will become
entitled to death or medical post-employment benefits by reason
of service to the Company or the Company Subsidiaries, other
than coverage mandated by section 4980B of the Code or
similar state law, where the payment of any such benefits would
have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.12. Litigation.
The Company SEC Documents accurately disclose as of the date
hereof all suits, claims, actions, investigations or proceedings
pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against
the Company or any Company Subsidiary that are required to be
disclosed therein by the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. As
of the date of this Agreement, there is no action, suit,
proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the
Company, threatened against the Company or any Company
Subsidiary that would have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.13. Compliance
with Applicable Laws. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries and their relevant personnel and operations are in
compliance with all applicable Laws, including Laws relating to
occupational health and safety, except to the extent that the
failure to be in compliance with any such Law has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of the Company, no employee or
agent of the Company or any Company Subsidiary has been engaged
in any activities that are prohibited or are cause for criminal
or civil penalties, including, but not limited to, knowingly and
willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any
remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly
or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any
Governmental Entity, governmental official or any relative of
such official, to obtain or retain business or to receive
favorable treatment with regard to the Companys business
or operations. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary
has received any written communication during the past two
(2) years from a Governmental Entity that alleges that the
Company or a Company Subsidiary is not in compliance in any
material respect with any applicable Law. The Company and the
Company Subsidiaries have in effect all Permits necessary or
advisable for them to own, lease or operate their properties and
assets and to carry on their businesses as now conducted, except
for such Permits the absence of which has not had or would not
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect. There has occurred no violation of, default (with or
without notice or lapse of time or both) under, or event giving
to others any right of termination, amendment or cancellation
of, with or without notice or lapse of time or both, any such
Permit, except for any such violation, default or event which
has not had or would not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. There is no event, other than
the Merger and the other Transactions, which, to the knowledge
of the Company, would reasonably be expected to result in the
revocation, cancellation, non-renewal or adverse modification of
any such Permit, except for any such event that has not had or
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
Section 3.13 does not relate to matters with respect
to Taxes (which are the subject of Section 3.09),
ERISA (which are the subject of Section 3.11), labor
Laws (which are the subject of Section 3.16) or
Environmental Laws (which are the subject of
Section 3.18).
Section 3.14. Assets
Other than Real Property Interests. The Company and the
Company Subsidiaries have good and valid title to all of their
respective properties and assets, in each case free and clear of
all Liens, except (a) mechanics, carriers,
workmens, repairmens or other like Liens arising or
incurred in the ordinary course of business relating to
obligations that
A-28
are not delinquent or that are being contested by the Company or
a Company Subsidiary and for which the Company or a Company
Subsidiary has established adequate reserves, (b) Liens for
Taxes that are not due and payable or that may thereafter be
paid without interest or penalty, (c) Liens that secure
debt obligations that are reflected as liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of March 31,
2005 contained in the Company SEC Documents and the existence of
which is referred to in the notes to such balance sheet,
(d) Liens arising under original purchase price conditional
sales contracts and equipment leases with third parties entered
into in the ordinary course of business, (e) leases,
subleases and similar agreements set forth in
Section 3.14 of the Company Disclosure Letter or
(f) other imperfections of title or encumbrances, if any,
that, individually or in the aggregate, do not materially
impair, and would not reasonably be expected materially to
impair, the continued use and operation of the assets to which
they relate in the conduct of the business of the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries as presently conducted. This
Section 3.14 does not relate to real property or
interests in real property, such items being the subject of
Section 3.15, or to Intellectual Property, such
items being the subject of Section 3.19.
Section 3.15. Real
Property. Section 3.15 of the Company
Disclosure Letter sets forth a complete list of all Company
Property, including any prime or underlying leases relating
thereto, which is necessary to conduct the business and
operations of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries as they
are presently conducted. The Company or a Company Subsidiary has
good, valid and marketable fee title to all Owned Property and
good and valid leasehold title to all Leased Property, in each
case subject only to (a) Liens described in
clause (a), (b), (c) or (f) of
Section 3.14 or Liens imposed or promulgated under
applicable Law or by any Governmental Entity with respect to
real property, including zoning, building, environmental or
similar restrictions, (b) leases, subleases and similar
agreements set forth in Section 3.15 of the Company
Disclosure Letter, (c) easements, covenants,
rights-of-way and other
similar restrictions of record (other than options or rights of
first refusal or offer to purchase) or (d) any conditions
that would be shown by a current, accurate survey or physical
inspection of any Company Property made on the date of this
Agreement. Any material reciprocal easement or operating
agreements with respect to Company Property are set forth in
Section 3.15 of the Company Disclosure Letter. With
respect to the Company Leased Property, (i) the Company or
one of the Company Subsidiaries has the right to use and
occupancy of the Company Leased Property for the full term of
the lease relating thereto, (ii) each lease for the Company
Leased Property is a legal, valid and binding agreement,
enforceable in accordance with its terms, of the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries, as applicable, subject to applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws
relating to or affecting the rights and remedies of creditors
generally and to general principles of equity (regardless of
whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law),
(iii) to the knowledge of the Company, there is no, nor has
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries received written
notice of any, default under any lease for the Company Leased
Property (or any condition or event, which, after notice or a
lapse of time or both would constitute a default thereunder) and
(iv) neither the Company nor any of the Company
Subsidiaries has assigned its interest under any lease for the
Company Leased Property or sublet any part of the premises
covered thereby or exercised any option or right thereunder.
Section 3.16. Labor
Matters. Section 3.16 of the Company
Disclosure Letter contains a list of each collective bargaining
agreement between the Company or any Company
A-29
Subsidiary and any labor union. Since March 31, 2005,
neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has experienced
any labor strikes, union organization attempts, requests for
representation, work slowdowns or stoppages or disputes due to
labor disagreements, and, to the knowledge of the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries, there is currently no such action
threatened against or affecting the Company or any Company
Subsidiary that would reasonably be expected to result in a
material liability to the Company. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries are each in compliance with all applicable Laws
with respect to labor relations, employment and employment
practices, occupational safety and health standards, terms and
conditions of employment and wages and hours, human rights, pay
equity and workers compensation, except to the extent that the
failure to be in compliance with any such Law has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. There is no unfair labor practice charge or
complaint against the Company or any Company Subsidiary pending
or, to the knowledge of the Company or any Company Subsidiary,
threatened before the National Labor Relations Board or any
comparable Federal, state, provincial or foreign agency or
authority that would reasonably be expected to result in
material liability to the Company. No grievance or arbitration
proceeding arising out of a collective bargaining agreement is
pending or, to the knowledge of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary, threatened against the Company or any Company
Subsidiary that would reasonably be expected to result in
material liability to the Company.
Section 3.17. Contracts.
(a) Section 3.17 of the Company Disclosure
Letter sets forth a true and complete list of the following
types of Contracts to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party (such Contracts being
Material Contracts):
|
|
|
(i) Contracts (including any so-called take-or-pay or
keepwell agreements) under which (A) any person including
the Company or a Company Subsidiary, has directly or indirectly
guaranteed indebtedness, liabilities or obligations of the
Company or a Company Subsidiary in excess of $3,000,000 or
(B) the Company or a Company Subsidiary has directly or
indirectly guaranteed indebtedness, liabilities or obligations
of any person, including the Company or another Company
Subsidiary, in excess of $3,000,000 (in each case other than
endorsements for the purpose of collection in the ordinary
course of business); |
|
|
(ii) Contracts under which the Company or a Company
Subsidiary has, directly or indirectly, made any advance, loan,
extension of credit or capital contribution to, or other
investment in, any person in excess of $3,000,000 (other than
the Company or a Company Subsidiary and other than extensions of
trade credit in the ordinary course of business); |
|
|
(iii) Contracts granting a Lien upon any Company Property
or any other asset of the Company or any Company Subsidiary
securing indebtedness or other obligations, in each case in
excess of $3,000,000; |
|
|
(iv) Contracts providing for indemnification of any person
in excess of $3,000,000 with respect to material liabilities
relating to such persons current or former services as
officer, director, consultant and agent to the Company, any
Company Subsidiary or any predecessor person; |
A-30
|
|
|
(v) a Contract not made in the ordinary course of business
in which the amount involved exceeds $1,000,000; |
|
|
(vi) (A) a Contract with a Governmental Entity in
which the amount involved exceeds $3,000,000 or (B) a
material license or permit by or from any Governmental Entity; |
|
|
(vii) currency exchange, interest rate exchange, commodity
exchange or similar Contract; |
|
|
(viii) a Contract for any joint venture, partnership or
similar arrangement; |
|
|
(ix) a lease, sublease or similar agreement with respect to
Company Property in which the amount involved exceeds
$3,000,000 per annum; |
|
|
(x) a Contract under which the Company or a Company
Subsidiary has agreed to purchase or lease any real property or
any interest in real property for a purchase price in excess of
$3,000,000 or an annual rental in excess of $3,000,000 or to
construct any improvements on real property or a leasehold
interest in real property for a contract sum in excess of
$3,000,000; |
|
|
(xi) a Contract that is a material contract as
such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC; |
|
|
(xii) a Contract that materially limits or otherwise
materially restricts the right of the Company or any of the
Company Subsidiaries to engage or compete in any line of
business in any geographic area; |
|
|
(xiii) a Contract that would be required to be disclosed
under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC; or |
|
|
(xiv) a Contract other than as set forth above to which the
Company or a Company Subsidiary is a party or by which it or any
of its assets or businesses is bound or subject that is material
to the business of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries or
the use or operation of their assets and in which the amount
involved exceeds $10,000,000. |
(b) All Material Contracts required to be listed in
Section 3.17 of the Company Disclosure Letter are
valid, binding and enforceable against the Company or the
applicable Company Subsidiary in accordance with their
respective terms and, to the knowledge of the Company, are in
full force and effect in all material respects, subject to
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or
other laws relating to or affecting the rights and remedies of
creditors generally and to general principles of equity
(regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or
at law). The Company or the applicable Company Subsidiary has
performed all material obligations required to be performed by
it to date under the Material Contracts, and it is not (with or
without the lapse of time or the giving of notice, or both) in
breach or default in any material respect thereunder and, to the
knowledge of the Company, no other party to any Material
Contract is (with or without the lapse of time or the giving of
notice, or both) in breach or default in any material respect
thereunder. Neither of the Company nor any Company Subsidiary
has received any written notice of the intention of any
A-31
party to terminate any Material Contract, and no party has, to
the knowledge of the Company, any such intention. True, complete
and correct copies of all Material Contracts, together with all
modifications and amendments thereto, have been previously
delivered or made available to Parent.
Section 3.18. Environmental
Matters. Except for such matters that individually or in
the aggregate have not had, and would not reasonably be expected
to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect, to the knowledge of
the Company:
|
|
|
(a) the Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries are,
and have been, in compliance with all Environmental Laws, and
neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has
received any (i) communication that alleges that the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries is in violation of,
or has liability under, any Environmental Law or
(ii) written request for information pursuant to any
Environmental Law; |
|
|
(b) (i) the Company and each of the Company
Subsidiaries have obtained and are in compliance with all
Environmental Permits necessary for their operations as
currently conducted, (ii) all such Environmental Permits
are valid and in good standing and (iii) neither the
Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has been advised by
any Governmental Entity of any actual or potential change in the
status or terms and conditions of any Environmental Permit; |
|
|
(c) there are no Environmental Claims pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened, against the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) there have been no Releases by the Company or any of
the Company Subsidiaries or their predecessors of any Hazardous
Material or other contamination of any property currently or
formerly owned, leased or operated by the Company or any of the
Company Subsidiaries (including soils, groundwater or surface
water) that would reasonably be expected to form the basis of
any Environmental Claim or grounds for remediation against the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries or against any person
whose liabilities for such Environmental Claims the Company or
any of the Company Subsidiaries has, or may have, retained or
assumed, either contractually or by operation of Law; |
|
|
(e) (i) neither the Company nor any of the Company
Subsidiaries has retained or assumed, either contractually or by
operation of Law, any liabilities or obligations that would
reasonably be expected to form the basis of any Environmental
Claim against the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries,
and (ii) to the knowledge of the Company, no Environmental
Claims are pending against any Person whose liabilities for such
Environmental Claims the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries has, or may have, retained or assumed, either
contractually or by operation of Law; and |
|
|
(f) neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
has arranged for the treatment or disposal of any Hazardous
Material on any third person property undergoing cleanup
pursuant to any Environmental Law. |
Section 3.19. Intellectual
Property. The Company and the Company Subsidiaries own,
or are validly licensed or otherwise have the right to use, all
Intellectual Property Rights that are necessary for the Company
to conduct its business and operations and the business and
A-32
operations of the Company Subsidiaries, other than such
Intellectual Property Rights the absence of which have not had
or would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. No claims are pending or, to the knowledge of
the Company, threatened that the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is infringing or otherwise adversely affecting the
rights of any person with regard to any Intellectual Property
Right. To the knowledge of the Company, no person is infringing
the rights of the Company or any Company Subsidiary with respect
to any Intellectual Property Right.
Section 3.20. Controls
and Procedures.
(a) Each of the principal executive officer and the
principal financial officer of the Company (or each former
principal executive officer and former principal financial
officer of the Company, as applicable) has made all
certifications required under Sections 302 and 906 of S/ OX
with respect to Company SEC Documents, and the Company has
delivered or made available to Parent a summary of any
disclosure made by management to the Companys auditors and
audit committee since March 31, 2005 referred to in such
certifications. For purposes of this
Section 3.20(a), principal executive
officer and principal financial officer shall
have the meanings given to such terms in S/ OX.
(b) The Company has (i) designed, implemented and
maintained disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable
assurance that material information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports it files with or furnishes to the SEC
under the Exchange Act is communicated to its management by
others within the Company and the Company Subsidiaries as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure, (ii) disclosed, based on its most recent
evaluation, to its auditors and the audit committee any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) which are reasonably likely
to materially affect its ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and (iii) disclosed, based on its
most recent evaluation, to its auditors and the audit committee
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in its internal
controls over financial reporting. The Company will provide to
Parent true, complete and correct copies of any such disclosure
that is made after the date of this Agreement.
(c) The Company has designed and implemented and maintains
a system of internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance concerning the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including reasonable
assurance (i) that transactions are executed in accordance
with managements general or specific authorizations and
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset
accountability and (ii) regarding prevention or timely
detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
assets that could have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company
Financial Statements.
(d) No personal loan or other extension of credit by the
Company or any Company Subsidiary to any of the Companys
executive officers or directors has been made or modified
A-33
(other than as permitted by Section 13 of the Exchange Act
and Section 402 of S/ OX) since March 31, 2005.
(e) Since March 31, 2004, (i) neither the Company
nor any of the Company Subsidiaries nor, to the Companys
knowledge, any Representative of the Company or any of the
Company Subsidiaries has received any complaint, allegation,
assertion or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the
accounting or auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or
methods of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries or
their respective internal accounting controls, including,
without limitation, any material complaint, allegation,
assertion or claim that the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries has engaged in improper or illegal accounting or
auditing practices or maintains improper or inadequate internal
accounting controls, and (ii) no attorney representing the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries, whether or not
employed by the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries, has
reported evidence of a material violation of U.S. Federal
or state securities Laws, a material breach of fiduciary duty or
similar material violation by Parent, any of the Company
Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the
Company Board or any member or committee of the Company Board.
(f) The Company has adopted one or more codes of conduct or
codes of ethics applicable to the officers and directors of the
Company and has provided the form(s) of such code(s) and copies
of any such code(s).
Section 3.21. Brokers
Fees; Finders Fees. Except for Credit Suisse and
Duff & Phelps, LLC whose fees will be paid by the
Company on or before the Closing Date, no broker, finder,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person, the fees
and expenses of which will be paid by the Company, is entitled
to any brokers, finders, financial advisors or
other similar fee or commission in connection with the Merger
and the other Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on
behalf of the Company.
Section 3.22. Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Company has received the
written opinion of each of Credit Suisse and Duff &
Phelps, LLC, dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect
that, as of such date, the consideration to be received in the
Merger by the holders of Company Common Stock, other than the
Excluded Persons, is fair to such holders from a financial point
of view, a signed copy of which opinion has been (or will be
promptly following the date of this Agreement) delivered to
Parent.
Section 3.23. Reorganization;
Approvals. As of the date of this Agreement, the Company
(a) is not aware of any fact or circumstance that could
reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from qualifying as
a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and (b) knows of no reason
why all regulatory approvals from any Governmental Entity
required for the consummation of the Transactions should not be
obtained on a timely basis.
Section 3.24. Insurance.
All insurance policies carried by or covering the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries with respect to their business, assets
and properties are in full force and effect, and no written
notice of cancellation has been received by the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries with respect to any such insurance
policy which has not been cured
A-34
by the payment of premiums that are due. The insurance coverage
provided by such insurance policies (including as to deductibles
and self-insured retentions) is reasonable and customary as
compared to similarly situated companies engaged in a similar
business.
Section 3.25. State
Takeover Statutes. The Company Board has, to the extent
such statutes are applicable, taken all action (including
appropriate approvals of the Company Board) necessary to render
the provisions of §203 of the DGCL inapplicable to the
Merger, this Agreement and the Transactions. To the knowledge of
the Company, no other state takeover statute or similar charter
or bylaw provisions are applicable to the Merger, this Agreement
or the Transactions.
ARTICLE IV
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Sub
Except as (i) expressly set forth in the corresponding
section of that certain letter, dated as of the date of this
Agreement, from Parent and Sub to the Company (the
Parent Disclosure Letter), it
being understood that disclosure of any matters under any
section of the Parent Disclosure Letter shall be deemed to be
disclosure of any other section of the Parent Disclosure Letter
to which the matter may reasonably apply, notwithstanding the
omission of an appropriate cross reference to such other
section, (ii) disclosed in any Parent SEC Document (as
defined in Section 4.06) or (iii) expressly
contemplated or permitted under this Agreement and any agreement
contemplated hereby or in connection with the consummation of
the Transactions, Parent and Sub, jointly and severally,
represent and warrant to Company that:
Section 4.01. Organization,
Standing and Power. Each of Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries is duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is
organized and has full power and authority to own, lease and
operate its properties and to conduct its businesses as
presently conducted. Each of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries
is duly qualified to do business in each jurisdiction where the
nature of its business or the ownership or leasing of its
properties make such qualification necessary or the failure to
so qualify individually or in the aggregate has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Parent has delivered or made available to the Company true,
complete and correct copies of the Parent Charter and Parent
Bylaws.
Section 4.02. Sub;
Parent Subsidiaries.
(a) Since the date of its incorporation, Sub has not
carried on any business or conducted any operations other than
the execution of this Agreement, the performance of its
obligations hereunder and matters ancillary thereto.
(b) The authorized capital stock of Sub consists of
1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, of which 1,000 shares are issued and outstanding,
all of which shares are fully paid and nonassessable and are
owned by Parent free and clear of any Lien.
Section 4.03. Capital
Structure. The authorized capital stock of Parent
consists of One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Parent
Common Stock, no par value, and Five Million (5,000,000) shares
of preferred stock, no par value. At the close of business on
January 16, 2006, (a) 33,108,999 shares of Parent
Common Stock were issued and outstanding, (b) no
A-35
shares of Parent Common Stock were held by Parent in its
treasury, (c) 1,582,500 shares of Parent Common Stock
were subject to outstanding options to purchase Parent Common
Stock granted under any stock option plan of Parent (a
Parent Employee Stock Option),
(d) 3,242,500 additional shares of Parent Common Stock were
reserved for issuance pursuant to stock option plans of Parent
and (e) 81,516 shares of Parent Common Stock are
currently reserved for issuance as restricted stock under
Parents Key Man Incentive Plan. Except as set forth above,
at the close of business on January 16, 2006, no shares of
capital stock or other voting securities of Parent were issued,
reserved for issuance or outstanding, and since January 16,
2006, no shares of capital stock or other voting securities of
Parent were issued by Parent, except for shares of Parent Common
Stock issued upon the exercise of Parent Employee Stock Options
outstanding as of January 16, 2006. All outstanding shares
of Parent Common Stock are, and all such shares that may be
issued prior to the Effective Time will be when issued, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not
subject to or issued in violation of any purchase option, call
option, right of first refusal, preemptive right, subscription
right or any similar right under any provision of the CGCL, the
DGCL, the Parent Charter, the Parent Bylaws or any Contract to
which Parent is a party or otherwise bound. There is no Voting
Parent Debt. Except as set forth above, as of the date of this
Agreement, there are not any options, warrants, rights,
convertible or exchangeable securities, phantom
stock rights, stock appreciation rights, stock-based performance
units, commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of
any kind to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is a party or
by which any of them is bound (i) obligating Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of capital stock or
other equity interests in, or any security convertible or
exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital stock of or
other equity interest in, Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or any
Voting Parent Debt, (ii) obligating Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary to issue, grant, extend or enter into any such
option, warrant, call, right, security, commitment, Contract,
arrangement or undertaking or (iii) that give any person
the right to receive any economic benefit or right similar to or
derived from the economic benefits and rights occurring to
holders of Parent Common Stock. As of the date of this
Agreement, there are not any outstanding contractual obligations
of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary.
Section 4.04. Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability.
(a) Each of Parent and Sub has all requisite corporate
power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to
consummate the Merger and the other Transactions. The execution
and delivery by each of Parent and Sub of this Agreement and the
consummation by it of the Merger and the other Transactions have
been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the
part of Parent and Sub. Parent, as sole stockholder of Sub, has
approved this Agreement. Each of Parent and Sub has duly
executed and delivered this Agreement, and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company, this Agreement constitutes its legal, valid and binding
obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms,
subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium or other laws relating to or affecting the rights and
remedies of creditors generally and to general principles of
equity (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law).
(b) The Parent Board, at a meeting duly called and held, by
a unanimous vote of the directors, duly adopted resolutions
approving this Agreement, the Merger, the Share Issuance
A-36
and the other Transactions. No approval of this Agreement, the
Merger, the Share Issuance or any of the other Transactions is
required from Parents stockholders.
Section 4.05. No
Conflicts; Consents.
(a) The execution and delivery by each of Parent and Sub of
this Agreement do not, and the consummation by Parent and Sub of
the Merger and the other Transactions and compliance by Parent
and Sub with the terms hereof will not, conflict with, or result
in any violation of or default (with or without notice or lapse
of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of any obligation or to loss of a
material benefit under, or to increased, additional, accelerated
or guaranteed rights or entitlements of any person under, or
result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the properties or
assets of Parent or any of its subsidiaries under, any provision
of (i) the Parent Charter, the Parent Bylaws or the charter
or organizational documents of any Parent Subsidiary,
(ii) any Contract to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary
is a party or by which any of their respective properties or
assets is bound or (iii) subject to the filings and other
matters referred to in Section 4.05(b), any Judgment
or Law applicable to Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or their
respective properties or assets, other than, in the case of
clauses (ii) and (iii) above, any such items that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Other than the Regulatory Filings, no Consent of, or
registration, declaration or filing with, or permit from, any
Governmental Entity is required to be obtained or made by Parent
or any Parent Subsidiary in connection with the execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement or the consummation
of the Transactions.
Section 4.06. Parent
SEC Documents; Parent Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities.
(a) Parent has filed or furnished all reports, schedules,
forms, statements and other documents required to be filed or
furnished by Parent with the SEC since December 31, 2002
pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act
(the Parent SEC Documents). No
Parent Subsidiary is required to file any report, schedule,
form, statement or other document with the SEC.
(b) As of the date that it was filed with the SEC,
(i) each Parent SEC Document complied in all material
respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to
such Parent SEC Document, (ii) each registration statement
and prospectus included therein (the Parent
Registration Documents) that was filed by
Parent since December 31, 2002 complied in all material
respects with the requirements of the Securities Act applicable
to such Parent Registration Documents and (iii) none of the
foregoing contained any untrue statement of a material fact or
omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Except to the extent that information contained in any Parent
SEC Document has been revised or superseded by a later filed
Parent SEC Document, none of the Parent SEC Documents contains
any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
A-37
(c) The consolidated financial statements of Parent
(including any notes and schedules thereto) included in the
Parent SEC Documents (i) complied as of their respective
dates as to form in all material respects with all applicable
accounting requirements and the published rules and regulations
of the SEC with respect thereto as in effect on the date of
filing and effectiveness thereof, (ii) were prepared in
conformity with GAAP as in effect as of the dates of such
financial statements, applied on a consistent basis (except as
may be indicated therein or in the notes thereto and, in the
case of unaudited statements, as permitted by the rules and
regulations of the SEC and disclosed to the Company) during the
periods involved and (iii) fairly present, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Parent and its
consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the
consolidated statements of their operations and cash flows for
the periods therein indicated (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments that were not
material in amount). There has been no change in Parents
accounting policies except as disclosed in the Parent SEC
Documents.
(d) Except (i) as set forth, reflected or reserved
against in the consolidated balance sheet (including the notes
thereto) of Parent as of December 31, 2004 included in its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, (ii) as set
forth, reflected or reserved against in any consolidated balance
sheet (including the notes thereto) of Parent included in any
other Parent SEC Document filed with the SEC after the filing
date of such Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and prior to the date
hereof, (iii) for liabilities and obligations incurred
since September 30, 2005 in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, or not otherwise prohibited
pursuant to this Agreement or (iv) for liabilities and
obligations incurred in connection with the Merger or any other
Transaction or any other agreement contemplated by this
Agreement, neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has
any liabilities or obligations of any nature (whether accrued,
absolute, contingent or otherwise) except for such liabilities
and obligations which, individually or in the aggregate, would
not have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.06(d) of the Parent Disclosure Letter sets
forth all liabilities and obligations incurred in connection
with the Merger and the other agreements contemplated by this
Agreement and the other Transactions.
Section 4.07. Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or to be
supplied by Parent or Sub for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (a) the
Form S-4 will, at
the time the
Form S-4 is filed
with the SEC, at any time it is amended or supplemented or at
the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein not misleading, or (b) the Company
Proxy Statement will, at the date it is first mailed to the
Companys stockholders or at the time of the Company
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading. The
Form S-4 will
comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements
of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder,
except that no representation is made by Parent or Sub with
respect to statements made therein based on information supplied
by the Company for inclusion therein or incorporation by
reference therein. The Company Proxy Statement will comply as to
form in all material respects with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, except
that no representation is made by Parent with respect to
statements made or incorporated by reference
A-38
therein based on information supplied by the Company in writing
for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein.
Section 4.08. Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Other than in connection
with or arising out of this Agreement, the Transactions and the
other agreements contemplated hereby, from December 31,
2004 to the date of this Agreement, (a) Parent has
conducted its business only in the ordinary course and
(b) there has not been any state of facts, event, change,
effect, development, condition or occurrence that, individually
or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to
have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.09. Litigation.
There is no suit, action, investigation or proceeding pending
or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary that, individually or in the aggregate, has
had or would reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect, nor is there any Judgment outstanding against
Parent or any Parent Subsidiary that has had or would reasonably
be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.10. Compliance
with Applicable Laws. Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries
and their relevant personnel and operations are in compliance
with all applicable Laws, including applicable Laws relating to
occupational health and safety, except to the extent that the
failure to be in compliance with any such Law has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of Parent, no employee or agent
of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary has been engaged in any
activities that are prohibited or are cause for criminal or
civil penalties, including, but not limited to, knowingly and
willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any
remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly
or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any
Governmental Entity, governmental official or any relative of
such official, to obtain or retain business or to receive
favorable treatment with regard to Parents business or
operations. Neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary has
received any written communication during the past two
(2) years from a Governmental Entity that alleges that
Parent or a Parent Subsidiary is not in compliance in any
material respect with any applicable Law. Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries have in effect all Permits necessary or advisable
for them to own, lease or operate their properties and assets
and to carry on their businesses as now conducted, except for
such Permits the absence of which has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
There has occurred no violation of, default (with or without
notice or lapse of time or both) under, or event giving to
others any right of termination, amendment or cancellation of,
with or without notice or lapse of time or both, any such
Permit, except for any such violation, default or event which
has not had or would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent
Material Adverse Effect. There is no event which, to the
knowledge of Parent, would reasonably be expected to result in
the revocation, cancellation, non-renewal or adverse
modification of any such Permit.
A-39
Section 4.11. Controls
and Procedures.
(a) Each of the principal executive officer and the
principal financial officer of Parent (or each former principal
executive officer and former principal financial officer of
Parent, as applicable) has made all certifications required
under Sections 302 and 906 of S/ OX with respect to Parent
SEC Documents, and Parent has delivered or made available to the
Company a summary of any disclosure made by management to
Parents auditors and audit committee since
December 31, 2002 referred to in such certifications. For
purposes of this Section 4.11(a), principal
executive officer and principal financial
officer shall have the meanings given to such terms in S/
OX.
(b) Parent has (i) designed, implemented and
maintained disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable
assurance that material information required to be disclosed by
Parent in the reports it files with or furnishes to the SEC
under the Exchange Act is communicated to its management by
others within Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure,
(ii) disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation, to its
auditors and the audit committee any significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) which are reasonably likely
to materially affect its ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and (iii) disclosed, based on its
most recent evaluation, to its auditors and the audit committee
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in its internal
controls over financial reporting. Parent will provide to the
Company true, complete and correct copies of any such disclosure
that is made after the date of this Agreement.
(c) Parent has designed and implemented and maintains a
system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act) sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance concerning the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including reasonable
assurance (i) that transactions are executed in accordance
with managements general or specific authorizations and
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset
accountability and (ii) regarding prevention or timely
detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
assets that could have a Material Adverse Effect on the Parent
Financial Statements. Parents management, with the
participation of Parents principal executive and financial
officers, has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of
Parents internal controls over financial reporting in
compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and such assessment concluded that such internal controls were
effective using the framework specified in Parents Annual
Report filed on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
(d) No personal loan or other extension of credit by Parent
or any Parent Subsidiary to any of its or their executive
officers or directors has been made or modified (other than as
permitted by Section 13 of the Exchange Act and
Section 402 of S/ OX) since December 31, 2002.
A-40
(e) Since December 31, 2002, (i) neither Parent
nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries nor, to Parents
knowledge, any Representative of Parent or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries has received any complaint, allegation, assertion
or claim, whether written or oral, regarding the accounting or
auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods of
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries, or their respective
internal accounting controls, including, without limitation, any
material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, that Parent
or any of the Parent Subsidiaries has engaged in improper or
illegal accounting or auditing practices or maintains improper
or inadequate internal accounting controls, and (ii) no
attorney representing Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries,
whether or not employed by Parent or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material violation of
U.S. Federal or state securities Laws, a material breach of
fiduciary duty or similar material violation by Parent, any of
the Parent Subsidiaries or any of their respective
Representatives, Parent Board or any member or committee of
Parent Board.
(f) Parent has adopted one or more codes of conduct or
codes of ethics applicable to the officers and directors of
Parent and has provided the form(s) of such code(s).
Section 4.12. Environmental
Matters. Except as set forth in the Parent SEC Documents
or for such matters that individually or in the aggregate have
not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect, to the knowledge of Parent:
|
|
|
(a) Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries are, and
have been, in compliance with all Environmental Laws, and
neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has received
any (i) communication that alleges that Parent or any of
the Parent Subsidiaries is in violation of, or has liability
under, any Environmental Law or (ii) written request for
information pursuant to any Environmental Law; |
|
|
(b) (i) Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries
have obtained and are in compliance with all Environmental
Permits necessary for their operations as currently conducted,
(ii) all such Environmental Permits are valid and in good
standing and (iii) neither Parent nor any of the Parent
Subsidiaries has been advised by any Governmental Entity of any
actual or potential change in the status or terms and conditions
of any Environmental Permit; |
|
|
(c) there are no Environmental Claims pending or, to the
knowledge of Parent, threatened, against Parent or any of the
Parent Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) there have been no Releases by Parent or any of the
Parent Subsidiaries or their predecessors of any Hazardous
Material or other contamination of any property currently or
formerly owned, leased or operated by Parent or any of the
Parent Subsidiaries (including soils, groundwater or surface
water) that would reasonably be expected to form the basis of
any Environmental Claim or grounds for remediation against
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries or against any person
whose liabilities for such Environmental Claims Parent or any of
the Parent Subsidiaries has, or may have, retained or assumed,
either contractually or by operation of Law; |
|
|
(e)(i) neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries
has retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of
Law, any liabilities or obligations that would reasonably |
A-41
be expected to form the basis of any Environmental Claim against
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries, and (ii) to the
knowledge of Parent, no Environmental Claims are pending against
any Person whose liabilities for such Environmental Claims
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries has, or may have,
retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of Law;
|
|
|
(f) Neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has
arranged for the treatment or disposal of any Hazardous Material
on any third person property undergoing cleanup pursuant to any
Environmental Law. |
Section 4.13. ERISA
Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments.
(a) Each collective bargaining agreement of Parent and each
bonus, pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation, incentive
compensation, stock ownership, stock purchase, stock
appreciation, restricted stock, stock option, phantom stock,
performance, retirement, thrift, savings, stock bonus,
cafeteria, paid time off, perquisite, fringe benefit, vacation,
severance, disability, death benefit, hospitalization, medical
or other welfare benefit or other plan, program, arrangement or
understanding of Parent, whether oral or written, formal or
informal, funded or unfunded (whether or not legally binding)
maintained, contributed to or required to be maintained or
contributed to by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or any other
Commonly Controlled Entity, whether or not providing material
benefits to any current or former employee, officer, director or
independent contractor of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary (each,
a Parent Plan Participant)
(collectively, Parent Benefit
Plans), other than Parent Multiemployer
Pension Plans (as defined in Section 4.13(c), and,
to the knowledge of Parent, each Parent Multiemployer Pension
Plan has been administered in material compliance with its terms
and applicable Law, and the terms of any applicable collective
bargaining agreements.
(b) All Parent Benefit Plans (other than Parent
Multiemployer Pension Plans) which are intended to be qualified
under Section 401(a) of the Code, have been the subject of
a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service to the
effect that the form of each such Parent Benefit Plan is
qualified and exempt from Federal income Taxes under
Sections 401(a) and 501(a), respectively, of the Code, and
satisfy the requirements for statutory changes required by the
legislation commonly known as GUST and each Parent
Benefit Plan has been amended to comply with statutory changes
by the legislation commonly known as EGTRRA, and no
such determination letter has been revoked nor, to the knowledge
of Parent, has revocation been threatened, nor has any such
Parent Benefit Plan been amended since the date of its most
recent determination letter or application therefor in any
respect that would adversely affect its qualification or
materially increase its costs or require security under
Section 307 of ERISA.
(c) Except as previously disclosed to the Company, during
the past three (3) years (i) neither Parent nor any
Commonly Controlled Entity of Parent has maintained, contributed
to or been obligated to maintain or contribute to, or has any
actual or contingent liability under, any Parent Benefit Plan
that is subject to Title IV of ERISA, other than any Parent
Benefit Plan that is a multiemployer plan within the
meaning of Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA (a
Parent Multiemployer Pension
Plan), (ii) there have been no non-exempt
prohibited transactions (as such term is defined in
Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code) with
respect to any Parent Benefit Plan that is subject to ERISA or
any other breach of fiduciary responsibility that
A-42
could reasonably be expected to subject Parent, any Parent
Subsidiary or any officer of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or
any of the Parent Benefit Plans which are subject to ERISA, or,
to the knowledge of Parent, any trusts created thereunder or any
trustee or administrator thereof to the tax or penalty on
prohibited transactions imposed by such Section 4975 or to
any material liability under Section 502(i) or 502(1) of
ERISA or to any other material liability for breach of fiduciary
duty under ERISA or any other applicable Law, (iii) no Parent
Benefit Plan which is subject to Title IV of ERISA, or any
trust related thereto, has been terminated, or (iv) (A)
neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary has incurred any
liability that remains unsatisfied with respect to a
complete withdrawal or a partial
withdrawal (as such terms are defined in Sections 4203 and
4205, respectively, of ERISA) since the effective date of such
Sections 4203 and 4205 with respect to any Parent Multiemployer
Pension Plan, (B) no such liability has been asserted, (C) there
are no events or circumstances known by Parent that would result
in any such complete withdrawal or partial withdrawal and (D)
neither Parent nor any Commonly Controlled Entity of Parent is
bound by any Contract or has any liabilities described in ERISA
Section 4204; provided, however, that the representation
contained in clause (i) through (iv) of this
Section 4.13(c) shall only apply to items which
Parent reasonably believes would result in a Parent Material
Adverse Effect.
(d) With respect to any Parent Benefit Plan that is a
welfare plan (as such term is defined in
Section 3(1) of ERISA), whether or not subject to ERISA,
(i) no such Parent Benefit Plan is funded through a
welfare benefits fund (as such term is defined in
Section 419(e) of the Code), (ii) each such Parent
Benefit Plan that is a group health plan (as such
term is defined in Section 5000(b)(1) of the Code),
complies, in all material respects, with the applicable
requirements of Section 4980B(f) of the Code or any similar
state statute, (iii) no such Parent Benefit Plan provides
benefits after termination of employment, except where the cost
thereof is borne entirely by the former employee (or his or her
eligible dependents or beneficiaries) or as required by
Section 4980B(f) of the Code or any similar state statute,
(iv) each such Parent Benefit Plan (including any such Plan
covering retirees or other former employees) may be amended or
terminated without material liability to Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries (except for expenses related to termination of any
such plan and paying any final claims related thereto) on or at
any time after the Effective Time and (v) Parent has
disclosed to the Company in the Parent Disclosure Letter whether
each welfare plan is self-insured or insured through third party
coverage.
(e) Except as could not reasonably be expected to have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect, since December 31, 2004,
neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary has received notice of,
and, to the knowledge of Parent, there are no (i) material
pending termination proceedings or other suits, claims (except
claims for benefits payable in the normal operation of the
Parent Benefit Plans), actions or proceedings against or
involving or asserting any rights or claims to benefits under
any Parent Benefit Plan (other than a Parent Benefit Plan which
is a Parent Multiemployer Pension Plan), or (ii) pending
investigations (other than routine inquiries) by any
Governmental Entity with respect to any Parent Benefit Plan
(other than a Parent Benefit Plan which is a Parent
Multiemployer Benefit Plan). Except as could not reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, all
contributions, premiums and benefit payments under or in
connection with the Parent Benefit Plans that are required to
have been made by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary have been
timely made, accrued or reserved for in all material respects.
A-43
(f) Neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary has any
material liability or obligations, including under or on account
of a Parent Benefit Plan, arising out of the hiring of persons
to provide services to Parent or any Parent Subsidiary and
treating such persons as consultants or independent contractors
and not as employees of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary.
(g) Parent has no legally binding plan or commitment to
create any additional Parent Benefit Plan or modify or change
any existing Parent Benefit Plan that would be reasonably
expected to result in material liabilities to Parent, except as
may be required by applicable Law. To the extent that any such
plan or commitment exists, whether or not expected to result in
material liability to Parent, Parent has provided a copy of such
plan or commitment to the Company.
(h) No employee, director or consultant is or will become
entitled to death or medical post-employment benefits by reason
of service to Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries, other than
coverage mandated by section 4980B of the Code or similar
state law, where the payment of any such benefits would have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.14. Intellectual
Property. Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries own, or are
validly licensed or otherwise have the right to use, all
Intellectual Property Rights that are necessary for Parent to
conduct its business and operations and the business and
operations of the Parent Subsidiaries, other than such
Intellectual Property Rights the absence of which have not had
or would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. No claims are pending or, to the knowledge of
Parent, threatened that Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is
infringing or otherwise adversely affecting the rights of any
person with regard to any Intellectual Property Right. To the
knowledge of Parent, no person is infringing the rights of
Parent or any Parent Subsidiary with respect to any Intellectual
Property Right.
Section 4.15. Real
Property. Parent or a Parent Subsidiary has good and
marketable fee title to all Parent Property that is Owned
Property and good and valid leasehold title to all Parent
Property that is Leased Property, in each case subject only to
(a) Liens described in Section 3.14(a),
(b) easements, covenants,
rights-of-way and other
similar restrictions of record (other than options or rights of
first refusal or offer to purchase) or (c) any conditions
that would be shown by a current, accurate survey or physical
inspection of any Parent Property made on the date of this
Agreement.
Section 4.16. Labor
Matters. Since December 31, 2002, neither Parent
nor any Parent Subsidiary has experienced any labor strikes,
union organization attempts, requests for representation, work
slowdowns or stoppages or disputes due to labor disagreements,
and, to the knowledge of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries,
there is currently no such action threatened against or
affecting Parent or any Parent Subsidiary that would reasonably
be expected to result in a material liability to Parent. Parent
and the Parent Subsidiaries are each in compliance with all
applicable Laws with respect to labor relations, employment and
employment practices, occupational safety and health standards,
terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours, human
rights, pay equity and workers compensation, except to the
extent that the failure to be in compliance with any such Law
has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect. There is no unfair labor
practice charge or complaint against Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary pending or, to the knowledge of Parent or any Parent
A-44
Subsidiary, threatened before the National Labor Relations Board
or any comparable Federal, state, provincial or foreign agency
or authority that would reasonably be expected to result in
material liability to Parent. No grievance or arbitration
proceeding arising out of a collective bargaining agreement is
pending or, to the knowledge of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary,
threatened against Parent or any Parent Subsidiary that would
reasonably be expected to result in material liability to Parent.
Section 4.17. Taxes.
(a) Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries has timely
filed all Returns required by applicable Tax law to be filed by
Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries. All Taxes owed by
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries to a taxing authority,
as of the date hereof, have been paid and, as of the Effective
Time, will have been paid. Parent has made accruals for Taxes on
Parent Financial Statements which are adequate to cover any Tax
liability of Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries
determined in accordance with GAAP through the date of Parent
Financial Statements.
(b) Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries have
withheld with respect to its employees all Federal and state
income Taxes and all other Taxes required to be withheld
(including, without limitation, Sections 1441, 1442, 3101,
3111 and 3402 of Code or similar provisions under all applicable
Laws).
(c) There is no Tax deficiency outstanding, proposed or
assessed against Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries.
Neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has executed
or requested any waiver of any statute of limitations on or
extending the period for the assessment or collection of any
Federal or material state Tax that is still in effect.
(d) No Tax audit or other examination of Parent or any of
the Parent Subsidiaries is presently in progress, nor has Parent
or any of the Parent Subsidiaries been notified in writing of
any request for such Tax audit or other examination.
(e) Neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries is a
party to (i) any agreement with a party other than Parent
or any of Parent Subsidiaries providing for the allocation or
payment of Tax liabilities or payment for Tax benefits with
respect to a consolidated, combined or unitary Return which
Return includes or included Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or
(ii) any Tax Agreement other than any Tax Agreement
described in the foregoing clause (i).
(f) Neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries
(i) has been a member of an affiliated group within the
meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Code or any similar group
defined under a similar provision of state, local or foreign law
filing (other than a group the common parent of which is Parent)
(A) since December 31, 2000 or (B) where such
membership would give rise to any liability that could be
reasonably expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect or
(ii) has any liability for the Taxes of any person (other
than the Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of
state, local, or foreign law), as a transferee or successor, by
contract or otherwise.
(g) Parent is not, and has not at any time been, a
United States Real Property Holding Corporation
within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Code.
A-45
(h) Neither Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries have
been a distributing corporation within the meaning
of Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code within the past two
(2) years.
(i) No material claim has ever been made by any
Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where Parent or any of the
Parent Subsidiaries does not file Tax returns that it is or may
be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction, and neither Parent
nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has received any notice of
any such material claim from any such authority.
Section 4.18. Brokers
Fees; Finders Fees. Except for UBS whose fees will
be paid by Parent on or before the Closing Date, no broker,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person is entitled
to any brokers, finders, financial advisors or
other similar fee or commission in connection with the Merger
and the other Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on
behalf of Parent or Sub.
Section 4.19. Reorganization;
Approvals. As of the date of this Agreement, Parent
(a) is not aware of any fact or circumstance that could
reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from qualifying as
a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and (b) knows of no reason
why all regulatory approvals from any Governmental Entity
required for consummation of the Transactions should not be
obtained on a timely basis.
Section 4.20. Aggregate
Cash Consideration. As of the date hereof, subject to
obtaining any consents or waivers required from Parents
lenders, Parent has available to it sufficient funds to deliver,
and as of the date of the mailing of the Company Proxy Statement
and immediately prior to the Effective Time, Parent will have
available to it sufficient funds to deliver, (i) the
aggregate Cash Consideration to be paid pursuant to this
Agreement and (ii) the aggregate cash payments to be made
in respect of the Holding Stock Options. In furtherance of the
foregoing, as of the date hereof, subject to obtaining any
consents or waivers required from Parents lenders, the
Liens with respect to the assets of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries contemplated herein are, and as of the date of the
mailing of the Company Proxy Statement and immediately prior to
the Effective Time, such Liens will be, permitted by
Parents lenders.
Section 4.21. Insurance.
All insurance policies carried by or covering Parent and the
Parent Subsidiaries with respect to their business, assets and
properties are in full force and effect, and no written notice
of cancellation has been received by Parent or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries with respect to any such insurance policy which has
not been cured by the payment of premiums that are due. The
insurance coverage provided by such insurance policies
(including as to deductibles and self-insured retentions) is
reasonable and customary as compared to similarly situated
companies engaged in a similar business.
ARTICLE V
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business
Section 5.01. Conduct
of Business.
(a) Conduct of Business by Company and Company
Subsidiaries. During the period from the date of this
Agreement and continuing until the Effective Time, the Company
agrees as
A-46
to itself and the Company Subsidiaries to the following (except
as (i) expressly contemplated or permitted by this
Agreement, (ii) as set forth in Section 5.01 of
the Company Disclosure Letter, (iii) as required by any
applicable Law, (iv) as required by a Governmental Entity
of competent jurisdiction, (v) to the extent approved in
writing by Parent prior to, or contemporaneously with, this
Agreement or (vi) to the extent that Parent shall otherwise
consent in writing, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed):
|
|
|
(A) Ordinary Course. The Company and the
Company Subsidiaries shall in all material respects carry on
their respective businesses in the usual, regular and ordinary
course and consistent with past practice. Without limiting the
foregoing, the Company and the Company Subsidiaries shall use
their commercially reasonable efforts to preserve substantially
intact their present lines of business, maintain their rights
and franchises and preserve substantially intact their
relationships with customers, suppliers and others having
business dealings with them and keep available the services of
their present officers and employees, in each case to the end
that their ongoing businesses shall not be impaired in a manner
that would have a Company Material Adverse Effect at the
Effective Time. |
|
|
(B) Dividends; Changes in Share Capital. The
Company shall not, and shall not permit any of the Company
Subsidiaries to (1) declare, set aside or pay any dividend
or other distribution with respect to any of its capital stock
(except for dividends by wholly owned Company Subsidiaries to
the Company), (2) split, combine or reclassify any of its
capital stock or issue any other securities in respect of, in
lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its capital stock,
except for (x) any such transaction by a wholly owned
Company Subsidiary which remains a wholly owned Subsidiary after
consummation of such transaction or (y) issuances of shares
of Company Common Stock upon the conversion or exercise of any
outstanding stock options in accordance with their terms, or
(3) repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of
its capital stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable for any shares of its capital stock. |
|
|
(C) Issuance of Securities. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to,
issue, deliver or sell any shares of its capital stock of any
class, any Voting Company Debt, any phantom stock,
phantom stock rights, stock appreciation rights or
stock based performance units or any securities convertible into
or exercisable for, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such shares of capital stock or Voting Company
Debt, other than the issuance of shares of Company Common Stock
upon the exercise of Company Stock Options and the Holding Stock
Options outstanding on the date of this Agreement and in
accordance with their terms. |
|
|
(D) Governing Documents. The Company shall
not amend its Company Charter or its Company Bylaws. |
|
|
(E) No Acquisitions. The Company shall not,
and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to, acquire
(or agree to acquire), in a single transaction or in a series of
related transactions, any business or assets that are material,
individually or in the aggregate, to the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other |
A-47
than transactions that are in the ordinary course of business
which ordinary course of business may not include a prior
pattern of acquiring the business or assets of other entities.
|
|
|
(F) No Dispositions. The Company shall not,
and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to, sell,
dispose of, transfer or divest any assets (including capital
stock of the Company Subsidiaries), businesses or divisions
other than transactions that (1) are in the ordinary course
of business which ordinary course of business may not include a
prior pattern of disposing of business or divisions or
(2) do not have a fair value, individually, in excess of
$3,000,000 or, in the aggregate, in excess of $10,000,000. |
|
|
(G) No Liens. The Company shall not, and
shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to, create,
assume or otherwise consensually incur any Lien on any asset
other than Liens (1) pursuant to the Company Senior Debt
Agreements or (2) incurred in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, including with respect
to expenses related to the Transactions. |
|
|
(H) Compensation; Severance. Except
(1) as required by applicable Law, (2) to satisfy
contractual obligations based on a change in control of the
Company pursuant to the Contracts specified in
Section 5.01(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter or
(3) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, the Company shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Company Subsidiaries to, (I) pay or commit to pay any
material severance or termination pay other than severance or
termination pay that is required to be paid pursuant to the
terms of a Company Benefit Plan existing as of the date of this
Agreement, (II) enter into any material employment,
deferred compensation, consulting, severance or other similar
agreement (or any amendment to any such existing agreement other
than amendments necessary or appropriate to bring such
agreements into compliance with Section 409A of the Code)
with any director or officer or key employee of the Company or
any of the Company Subsidiaries, (III) increase or commit
to increase in any material respect any employee benefits
payable to any director, officer or employee of the Company or
any of the Company Subsidiaries, including wages, salaries,
compensation, pension, severance, termination pay or other
benefits or payments (except as required by an existing Company
Benefit Plan or applicable Law and other than increases in
connection with annual merit and/or cost of living increases
that are consistent with past practice in the timing, amount and
procedures for implementation), (IV) adopt or make any
commitment to adopt any additional employee benefit plan,
(V) make any material contribution to any Company Benefit
Plan, other than (x) regularly scheduled contributions and
(y) contributions required pursuant to the terms thereof or
applicable Law, agreement, order or plan, or (VI) amend or
extend or make any commitments to amend or extend any Company
Benefit Plan in any material respect, except for amendments
required by applicable Law. |
|
|
(I) Accounting Methods; Income Tax Elections.
The Company shall not, and shall not permit any of the Company
Subsidiaries to, (1) change in any material respect its
methods of accounting or accounting practice as in effect at
March 31, 2005, except for any such change as required by
reason of a change in SEC guidelines or |
A-48
GAAP, (2) change its fiscal year, (3) prepare or file
any material Tax return materially inconsistent with past
practice or, on any such Tax Return, take any position, make any
election, or adopt any method that is materially inconsistent
with positions taken, elections made or methods used in
preparing or filing similar Tax returns in prior periods or
(4) settle or compromise any material claim relating to
Taxes.
|
|
|
(J) Certain Agreements. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to,
enter into any Material Contract that limits or restricts the
right of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries or any
of their respective affiliates or successors, or that would,
after the Effective Time, limit or restrict the right of the
Parent, the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective
affiliates or successors, to engage or compete in any business
or in any geographic area or location. |
|
|
(K) Corporate Structure. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to,
alter (through merger, liquidation, reorganization,
restructuring or any other fashion) the corporate structure of
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(L) Capital Expenditures. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to,
make any capital expenditures, capital additions or capital
improvements except in the ordinary course of business or in
accordance with the Companys capital expenditures budgets
for its 2006 and 2007 fiscal years, and in any event shall not
make aggregate capital expenditures, other than as provided for
in such budgets, in excess of $5,000,000 between the date of
this Agreement and the Closing Date. |
|
|
(M) Prohibited Activities. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of the Company Subsidiaries to,
agree, authorize or enter into any commitment to take any action
described in the foregoing subsections (A) through (L) of
this Section 5.01(a), except as otherwise permitted
by this Agreement. |
(b) Conduct of Business of Parent and Parent
Subsidiaries. During the period from the date of this
Agreement and continuing until the Effective Time, Parent agrees
as to itself and the Parent Subsidiaries that (except as
(i) expressly contemplated or permitted by this Agreement,
(ii) as set forth in Section 5.01 of the Parent
Disclosure Letter, (iii) as required by any applicable Law,
(iv) as required by a Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction, (v) to the extent approved in writing by the
Company prior to, or contemporaneously with, this Agreement or
(vi) to the extent that the Company shall otherwise consent
in writing, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed):
|
|
|
(A) Ordinary Course. Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries shall in all material respects carry on their
respective businesses in the usual, regular and ordinary course
and consistent with past practice. Without limiting the
foregoing, Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries shall use their
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve substantially intact
their present lines of business, maintain their rights and
franchises and preserve substantially intact their relationships
with customers, suppliers and others having business dealings
with them and keep available the services of their present |
A-49
officers and employees, in each case to the end that their
ongoing businesses shall not be impaired in a manner that would
have a Parent Material Adverse Effect at the Effective Time.
|
|
|
(B) Changes in Share Capital. Parent shall
not repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its
capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable
for any shares of its capital stock. |
|
|
(C) Issuance of Securities. Parent shall not,
and shall not permit any of the Parent Subsidiaries to, issue,
deliver or sell any shares of its capital stock of any class,
any Voting Parent debt, any phantom stock,
phantom stock rights, stock appreciation rights or
stock based performance units or any securities convertible into
or exercisable for, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such shares of capital stock or Voting Parent Debt,
other than (1) the issuance of shares of Parent Common
Stock upon the exercise of stock options outstanding on the date
of this Agreement in accordance with the terms of Parents
stock option plans in effect as of the date of this Agreement,
(2) the issuance of restricted shares pursuant to the terms
of Parents Key Man Incentive Plan, (3) the grant of
stock options or the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock
upon the exercise of such stock options in accordance with the
terms of Parents stock option plans in effect as of the
date of this Agreement or (4) issuances by a wholly owned Parent
Subsidiary of capital stock to such Subsidiarys parent or
another wholly owned Parent Subsidiary. |
|
|
(D) Governing Documents. Parent shall not
amend the Parent Charter or Parent Bylaws and shall cause Sub
not to amend its certificate of incorporation or its bylaws. |
|
|
(E) Corporate Structure. Parent shall not
alter (through merger, liquidation, reorganization,
restructuring or any other fashion) the corporate structure or
ownership of Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries where such
change in the corporate structure is reasonably likely to result
in a Parent Material Adverse Effect or would adversely effect
the value of the Parent Common Stock. |
|
|
(F) Prohibited Activities. Parent shall not,
and shall not permit any of the Parent Subsidiaries to, agree,
authorize or enter into any commitment to take any action
described in the foregoing subsections (A) through (E) of
this Section 5.01(b), except as otherwise permitted
by this Agreement. |
(c) Other Actions. The Company and Parent
shall not, and shall not permit any of their respective
subsidiaries to, take any action that would, or that would
reasonably be expected to, result in (i) any of the
representations and warranties of such Party set forth in this
Agreement that is qualified as to materiality becoming untrue,
(ii) any of such representations and warranties that is not
so qualified becoming untrue in any material respect or
(iii) any condition to the Merger set forth in
Article VII not being satisfied.
(d) Advice of Changes. The Company and Parent
shall promptly advise the other orally and in writing of any
state of facts, event, change, effect, development,
condition or
A-50
occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or
would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
on such Party.
Section 5.02. No
Solicitation.
(a) From the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time,
unless this Agreement is terminated earlier pursuant to
Article VIII, the Company shall not, nor shall it
authorize or permit any Company Subsidiary to, nor shall it
authorize or permit any Representative of, the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to, and the Company shall cause its and the
Company Subsidiaries Representatives not to, directly or
indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, negotiate, knowingly
encourage or knowingly facilitate (including by way of
furnishing non-public information) the submission of any Company
Takeover Proposal, (ii) enter into any agreement with
respect to any Company Takeover Proposal or
(iii) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect
to, or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the
making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Company Takeover Proposal, or afford
access to properties, books or records of the Company or the
Company Subsidiaries to, any Person that made a Company Takeover
Proposal or to any Person that has disclosed to the Company that
it is contemplating making a Company Takeover Proposal;
provided, however, that, prior to the consummation of the
Merger, in addition to Section 5.02(b), the Company
may, in response to an unsolicited bona fide Company Takeover
Proposal which did not result from a breach of this
Section 5.02(a) and which the Company Board
determines, in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, is, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to, a Superior Company Proposal, and subject to
compliance with Section 5.02(c), (x) furnish
information with respect to the Company to the person making
such Company Takeover Proposal and its Representatives pursuant
to a customary confidentiality agreement (which shall have terms
and conditions no less favorable than those in the
Confidentiality Agreement), (y) participate in discussions
or negotiations with such person and its Representatives
regarding any Company Takeover Proposal and (z) take, and
disclose to the Companys stockholders, a position with
respect to any tender offer or exchange offer by a third party
or amend or withdraw such position in accordance with
Rule 14d-9 and
Rule 14e-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act (provided that the Company
Board shall not recommend that the Companys stockholders
tender their shares of capital stock in the Company in
connection with such tender offer or exchange unless the Company
has complied with Section 5.02(b)).
(b) If, prior to the consummation of the Merger:
|
|
|
(i) (A) the Company Board has received a Superior
Company Proposal or (B) the Company Board shall have
determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, that the failure to
withdraw or modify the Company Recommendation may be reasonably
expected to violate the fiduciary duties of the Company Board
under applicable Law, |
|
|
(ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing of the
determination described in clause (i) above, |
A-51
|
|
|
(iii) at least four (4) business days following
receipt by Parent of the notice received in clause (ii)
above, and taking into account any revised proposal made by
Parent since receipt of the notice referred to in
clause (ii) above, the Company Board determines that such
Superior Company Proposal remains a Superior Company
Proposal, and |
|
|
(iv) the Company is in compliance with this
Section 5.02, |
then the Company Board may withdraw or modify the Company
Recommendation (as defined in Section 6.01(f)).
(c) The Company promptly, but in any event within five
(5) business days after receipt thereof, shall advise
Parent in writing of any Company Takeover Proposal, including
the material terms and conditions thereof, or any inquiry with
respect to or that would reasonably be expected to lead to any
Company Takeover Proposal. The Company shall promptly, but in
any event no later than two (2) business days before
providing information or entering into discussions with such
third party, provide written notice to Parent of the
Companys intent to furnish information or enter into
discussions with such third party. The Company shall promptly
provide Parent a copy of the Companys response to a
Company Takeover Proposal and copies of any amendments or
modifications to the Company Takeover Proposal.
ARTICLE VI
Additional Agreements
Section 6.01. Preparation
of the Form S-4
and the Company Proxy Statement; Company Stockholders
Meetings.
(a) As soon as practicable following the date of this
Agreement, the Company and Parent shall prepare and file with
the SEC a Company proxy statement (the Company
Proxy Statement) in preliminary form and
Parent shall prepare and file with the SEC the
Form S-4, in which
the Company Proxy Statement and a Parent prospectus relating to
the Share Issuance will be included, and each of the Company and
Parent shall use its reasonable efforts to respond as promptly
as practicable to any comments of the SEC with respect thereto.
Each of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable efforts
to have the
Form S-4 declared
effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable
after such filing, but, in any event, no more than three
(3) business days after the SEC notifies Parent that the
SEC will consider a written request for the acceleration of the
effective date of the
Form S-4 and shall
use reasonable efforts to keep the
Form S-4 effective
as long as necessary to consummate the Merger and the other
Transactions. Absent any restraint under applicable Law, the
Company will use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the Company Proxy Statement to be mailed to its stockholders as
promptly as practicable (but no more than five (5) business
days) after the
Form S-4 is
declared effective under the Securities Act. Parent shall also
take any action (other than qualifying to do business in any
jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified) required to be
taken under any applicable state securities laws in connection
with the issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger and the
Transactions and the Company shall furnish all information
concerning the Company and the holders of the Company Common
Stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such
action. The parties shall notify each other promptly of the
receipt of any comments from
A-52
the SEC or its staff and of any request by the SEC or its staff
for amendments or supplements to the Company Proxy Statement or
the Form S-4 or
for additional information and shall supply each other with
copies of all correspondence between such or any of its
representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or its staff, on
the other hand, with respect to the Company Proxy Statement, the
Form S-4 or the
Merger.
(b) The
Form S-4 shall
comply in all material respects with all applicable Laws
respecting securities, including rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC.
(c) No filing of, or amendment or supplement to, the
Form S-4, and no
correspondence with the SEC with respect thereto, will be made
by Parent or the Company without the prior consent of the other
Party (including providing the other Party a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment on such amendment or
supplement). Parent will advise the Company, promptly after it
receives notice thereof, of the time when any of the
Form S-4 has
become effective or any supplement or amendment has been filed,
the issuance of any stop order, the suspension of the
qualification of the Parent Common Stock that comprises the
Stock Consideration issuable in connection with the Merger for
offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC
for amendment of the
Form S-4 or
comments thereon and responses thereto or requests by the SEC
for additional information. If, at any time prior to the Closing
Date, any information relating to Parent or the Company, any of
their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, officers or
directors, should be discovered by Parent or the Company which
should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to the
Form S-4, so that
any of such documents would not include any misstatement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary to
make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading, the Party which discovers
such information shall promptly notify the other Parties and an
appropriate amendment or supplement describing such information
shall be promptly filed with the SEC and, to the extent required
by applicable Law, disseminated to the stockholders of the
Company.
(d) Each of Parent and the Company shall use commercially
reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered to each other a
letter of its independent auditors, dated (i) a date within
two (2) business days prior to the date on which the
Form S-4 shall
become effective and (ii) the Closing Date, and addressed
to such other Party and its directors, in form and substance
customary for comfort letters delivered by
independent public accountants in connection with registration
statements similar to the
Form S-4 and
reasonably acceptable to the recipient Party.
(e) Subject to Section 5.02 and other than
pursuant to
Rule 14a-12 of the
Exchange Act with respect to public announcements made in
compliance with Section 6.08, no amendment or
supplement to the Company Proxy Statement, nor any response to
any comments or inquiry from the SEC, will be made by the
Company or Parent without the approval of such other Party,
which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
(f) The Company shall, as soon as practicable following the
date of this Agreement, and in any event, subject to
Section 6.01(g) and any applicable Law or Judgment,
within forty-five (45) days following the mailing of the
Company Proxy Statement, duly call, give notice of, convene and
hold the Company Stockholders Meeting for the purpose of
seeking the Company Stockholder Approval; provided,
however, that the Company may delay calling, giving notice
of,
A-53
convening or holding the Company Stockholders Meeting for
a reasonable period to address and resolve any restraint
affecting this Agreement or the Transactions arising from an
applicable Law or Judgment (including, without limitation,
addressing and resolving any comments from the SEC);
provided, further, that, when scheduling the
Stockholders Meeting, the Company will consider the
Parents desire that the Closing, if practicable, occur on
the first (1st) business day of a calendar month. Subject to
Section 5.02(b), the Company Proxy Statement shall
include the recommendation of the Company Board that the
adoption of this Agreement by the Companys stockholders is
advisable and that the Company Board has determined that the
Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to and in the
best interests of the Companys stockholders (the
Company Recommendation).
(g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
preceding paragraph, at any time prior to the Company
Stockholders Meeting and subject to compliance with
Section 5.02, the Company may adjourn or postpone
the Company Stockholders Meeting in response to a Company
Takeover Proposal for such time as the Company Board determines
is appropriate to investigate and consider such Company Takeover
Proposal, if the Company Board determines in good faith after
consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial
advisors that such Company Takeover Proposal may reasonably be
expected to lead to a Superior Company Proposal and that the
failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under applicable Law. The Company shall not be required to hold
the Company Stockholders Meeting if this Agreement is
terminated before the Company Stockholders Meeting is held.
(h) Each of the Company and Parent agrees, as to itself and
its subsidiaries, that none of the information supplied or to be
supplied by it or its subsidiaries for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4, or any
amendment or supplement thereto, to be filed with the SEC by
Parent in connection with the issuance of shares of Parent
Common Stock in the Merger (including the Company Proxy
Statement) will, at the time the
Form S-4 becomes
effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, and (ii) the Company Proxy Statement
and any amendment or supplement thereto will, at the date of
mailing to stockholders of the Company and at the time of the
Company Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading. The Company and Parent will
cause the Form S-4
to comply as to form in all material respects with the
applicable provisions of the Securities Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. No representation or
warranty is made by the Company in this
Section 6.01(h) with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by Parent or Sub for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
the Form S-4
(including the Company Proxy Statement), and no representation
or warranty is made by Parent or Sub in this
Section 6.01(h) with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by the Company for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
the Form S-4
(including the Company Proxy Statement).
Section 6.02. HSR
Act Filing. As promptly as possible after the date of
this Agreement, if required by any Law, each of Parent and the
Company shall file with the FTC and the Antitrust Division of
the United States Department of Justice (the
Antitrust Division) a
A-54
pre-merger notification in accordance with the HSR Act with
respect to the Merger pursuant to this Agreement, and shall file
an antitrust notification in any other jurisdiction if required
by any Law (including, without limitation, the Regulatory
Filings). Each of Parent and the Company shall furnish promptly
to the FTC, the Antitrust Division and any other requesting
Governmental Entity any additional information requested by them
pursuant to the HSR Act or any other antitrust notification in
connection with such filings. Parent and the Company shall
cooperate fully with each other in connection with the making of
all such filings or responses, including, subject to applicable
Law and privileges, including the attorney-client privilege,
(a) providing copies of all of such documents to the other
Party and its Representatives prior to filing or responding and
(b) timely furnishing to the other Party all information
concerning itself, its Subsidiaries, officers, directors and
shareholders as may be reasonably requested in connection with
the foregoing.
Section 6.03. Access
to Information; Confidentiality. Upon reasonable notice,
each of the Company and Parent shall, and shall cause each of
its respective significant subsidiaries (determined in
accordance with
Regulation S-X
promulgated under the Securities Act) to, afford to the other
Party and to the officers, employees, accountants, legal
counsel, financial advisors and other representatives of such
other Party, reasonable access during normal business hours
during the period prior to the Effective Time to all of their
respective properties, books, contracts, commitments, personnel
and records and, during such period, each of the Company and
Parent shall, and shall cause each of its respective significant
subsidiaries to, furnish promptly to the other Party (a) a
copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and other
document filed or furnished by it during such period pursuant to
the requirements of Federal or state securities laws and
(b) all other information concerning its business,
properties and personnel as such other Party may reasonably
request; provided that each of the Company and Parent
shall have the right to access the properties, books, contracts,
commitments, personnel and records of any non-significant
subsidiary of the other Party to extent that the operations or
business of any such subsidiary would reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect upon such other Party. Without
limiting the foregoing, Parent and its representatives shall be
allowed to conduct a Phase I environmental investigation of
the Company, the Company Subsidiaries and their properties, but
shall not be allowed, absent the prior written approval of the
Company, to perform any environmental sampling or analysis of
the sort commonly referred to as a Phase II environmental
investigation, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld
or delayed; provided, however, that the Parties
acknowledge and agree that the conduct and completion of any
such environmental investigation shall not be a condition to the
closing of the Transactions. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries shall reasonably cooperate with Parent and its
representatives in connection with any such environmental
investigation, including making available personnel, outside
contractors and outside consultants with knowledge of
environmental matters pertaining to the Company, the Company
Subsidiaries and their properties and making available relevant
documents related to such matters. Neither Parent nor Sub shall,
and Parent and Sub shall cause each of its representatives not
to, use any information acquired pursuant to this
Section 6.03 for any purpose unrelated to the
consummation of the Transactions. All information exchanged,
made available or acquired pursuant to this
Section 6.03 shall be subject to the Confidentiality
Agreement.
A-55
Section 6.04. Reasonable
Efforts; Notification.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in this Agreement, each of the Parties shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken,
all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other Parties in doing, all things necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the
most expeditious manner practicable, the Merger and the other
Transactions to be performed or consummated by such Party in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including
(i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions,
waivers, consents and approvals from Governmental Entities and
the making of all necessary registrations and filings (including
filings with Governmental Entities, if any) and the taking of
all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval
or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any
Governmental Entity, (ii) the obtaining of all necessary
consents, approvals or waivers from third parties,
(iii) the defending of any lawsuits or other legal
proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging
this Agreement or the consummation of the Transactions to be
performed or consummated by such Party in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement, including seeking to have any stay or
temporary restraining order entered by any court or other
Governmental Entity vacated or reversed and (iv) the
execution and delivery of any additional instruments necessary
to consummate the Transactions to be performed or consummated by
such Party in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and to
fully carry out the purposes of this Agreement. In connection
with and without limiting the foregoing, the Company and the
Company Board shall (x) take all reasonable action
necessary to ensure that no state takeover statute or similar
statute or regulation is or becomes applicable to any
Transaction or this Agreement and (y) if any state takeover
statute or similar statute or regulation becomes applicable to
any Transaction or this Agreement, take all reasonable action
necessary to ensure that the Merger and the other Transactions
may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms
contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise to minimize the
effect of such statute or regulation on the Merger and the other
Transactions. Subject to applicable Laws relating to the
exchange of information, Parent and the Company shall have the
right to review in advance and, to the extent practicable, each
will consult with the other Party on, all of the information
relating to itself and its subsidiaries that appear in any
filing made with, or written materials submitted to, any
Governmental Entity in connection with the Merger and the
Transactions.
(b) Parent shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to
be done, and to assist and cooperate with its Representatives in
doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable to obtain,
prior to the mailing of the Company Proxy Statement, all waivers
and consents required from Parents lenders to consummate
the Transactions, including, without limitation, to provide
Parent with sufficient funds to deliver the Cash Consideration
and other cash payments due hereunder and to permit the
existence of the Liens of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries contemplated herein.
(c) The Company shall give prompt notice to Parent, and
Parent or Sub shall give prompt notice to the Company, of
(i) any representation or warranty made by it contained in
this Agreement that is qualified as to materiality becoming
untrue or inaccurate in any respect or any such representation
or warranty that is not so qualified becoming untrue or
inaccurate in any material respect or (ii) the failure by
it to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any
covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or
satisfied by it under this Agreement;
A-56
provided, however, that no such notification shall affect
the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of the
Parties or the conditions to the obligations of the Parties
under this Agreement.
(d) Nothing in Section 6.04(a) shall require
Parent to dispose of any of its assets or to limit its freedom
of action with respect to any of its businesses, or to consent
to any disposition of the Companys assets or limits on the
Companys freedom of action with respect to any of its
businesses, or to commit or agree to any of the foregoing, and
nothing in Section 6.04(a)shall authorize the
Company to commit or agree to any of the foregoing, to obtain
any consents, approvals, permits or authorizations or to remove
any impediments to the Merger relating solely to the Antitrust
Laws or to avoid the entry of, or to effect the dissolution of,
any injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in
any suit or proceeding relating solely to Antitrust Laws.
Section 6.05. Company
Stock Options; Company RSP; Other Employee Benefits.
(a) At the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall
assume all obligations of the Company with respect to the
Company RSP and the Supplemental SBP. Parent shall guarantee
performance of the Surviving Corporations obligation to
make an Additional Employer Contribution to the Company RSP and
the Supplemental SBP. Parent agrees to register and list any
shares of Parent Common Stock issuable to the Company RSP as the
Additional Employer Contribution. At the Effective Time the
Surviving Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to, (i) amend the definition of
Company Stock in the Company RSP and Supplemental
SBP to mean shares of Parent Common Stock, (ii) amend the
Additional Employer Contribution required by
Appendix 3.3 of the Company RSP to be made for the
Plan Year ended March 31, 2006, to state that
such Additional Employer Contribution will be made in a number
of shares of Parent Common Stock at least equal to the number of
shares of Company Common Stock that would have been contributed
for such Plan Year had the Merger not occurred, multiplied by
the Option Exchange Ratio and (iii) amend Section 6.5
of the Company RSP to delete restrictions on trading Company
Common Stock contained in subsections 6.5(b) and 6.5(c)(5)
therein (but not the diversification rules in
Section 6.5(c)(2) and (3)). Prior to the Effective Time,
Parent shall reserve for issuance the number of shares of Parent
Common Stock necessary to satisfy Parents obligations
under this Section 6.05(a). The
Form S-4 and the
NYSE listing application shall include the shares of Parent
Common Stock issuable to the Company RSP (and the Supplemental
SBP) as Merger Consideration and as the Additional Employer
Contribution.
(b) Promptly after the Effective Time, Parent shall file
with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-8 or such
other appropriate form with respect to the shares of Parent
Common Stock to be issued or issuable pursuant to the Company
RSP and shall use its best efforts to maintain the current
status of the prospectus contained, or incorporated by
reference, in such registration statement, as well as comply
with any applicable listing requirements of the NYSE and state
securities or blue sky laws, for so long as the
Company RSP has an investment option including Parent Common
Stock, which investment option shall be continued for not less
than one (1) year after the Effective Time.
A-57
(c) The Surviving Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause
the Surviving Corporation to, maintain for not less than one
(1) year after the Effective Time the Company Benefit Plans
as in effect on the date of this Agreement as set forth on the
Company Disclosure Letter (other than the Company Option Plan)
or to provide coverage and benefits, including, without
limitation, with respect to the Company RSP, to make annual
contributions pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Company RSP
consistent with past practice, to each employee of the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries as of the Effective Time (the
Covered Employees) that are at
least as favorable in the aggregate to such employees as those
in effect on the date of this Agreement, except as may be
required pursuant to any applicable collective bargaining
agreement.
(d) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall, and
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to honor in accordance
with their respective terms (as in effect on the date of this
Agreement), all of the Companys employment, change of
control, severance and termination agreements, plans and
policies (including, without limitation, bonuses, incentives or
deferred compensation) with its employees disclosed in the
Company Disclosure Letter. Parent shall, and shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to, timely amend any and all plans and
arrangements (and any and all related documents) adopted or
maintained by the Company prior to the Effective Time that
provide for the deferral of compensation subject to
Section 409A of the Code to the extent necessary to avoid
liability under such Section 409A.
(e) For a period of one (1) year from the Closing
Date, Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall provide the
Covered Employees, who, immediately prior to the Effective Time,
were employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries and had not
entered into an employment, change of control, severance or
termination agreement with the Company, with annual rates of
base salary or hourly wages, as applicable, and annual incentive
opportunities that are at least as favorable in the aggregate to
such employees as those in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time. For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree
that the Companys Management Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for
fiscal year ending March 31, 2007 will be paid on a
twelve-month fiscal year basis consistent with the general
approach of the same plan for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2006, and the Companys Management Incentive
Cash Bonus Plan may change to a calendar year basis for the
nine-month period ending December 31, 2007.
(f) With respect to any employee benefit plan, program or
arrangement maintained by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary
(including any severance plan), for all purposes of determining
eligibility to participate and vesting and, except under any
defined benefit pension plans, for purposes of benefit accrual,
service by a Company employee with the Company or any Company
Subsidiary shall be treated as service with Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary; provided, however, that such service need not
be recognized to the extent that such recognition would result
in any duplication of benefits.
(g) From and after the Effective Time, those certain
transfer restriction letter agreements between the Company and
each of its executive officers and district managers shall
terminate and be of no further force and effect.
A-58
Section 6.06. Indemnification;
Insurance.
(a) In the event of any threatened or actual claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative (a Claim),
including any such Claim in which an individual who is now, or
has been at any time prior to the date of this Agreement, or who
becomes prior to the Effective Time, a director, officer or
employee of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries or
who is or was serving at the request of the Company or any of
the Company Subsidiaries as a director, officer or employee of
another person (the Indemnified
Parties) is, or is threatened to be, made a
party based in whole or in part on, or arising in whole or in
part out of, or pertaining to (i) the fact that he or she
is or was a director, officer or employee of the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time or
(ii) this Agreement or any of the Transactions, whether
asserted or arising before or after the Effective Time, the
Parties shall cooperate and use their best efforts to defend
against and respond thereto. Parent shall, to the fullest extent
permitted by Law, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to
(i) maintain and preserve, for a period of six
(6) years after the Effective Time, the rights to
exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses of all
Indemnified Parties as provided in the Company Charter, the
Company Bylaws and the comparable charter and organization
documents of each Company Subsidiary as in effect on the date
hereof and (ii) honor all of the Companys obligations
to indemnify (including any obligations to advance funds for
expenses) all Indemnified Parties, for and in connection with
acts or omissions by such persons occurring prior to the
Effective Time to the extent that such obligations of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary exist on the date of this
Agreement, whether pursuant to the Company Charter, the Company
Bylaws, the comparable charter and organizational documents of
each Company Subsidiary, individual indemnity agreements or
otherwise, as the case may be, and such obligations shall
survive the Merger and shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with the terms of the Company Charter, the Company
Bylaws, each Company Subsidiarys charter and
organizational documents and such individual indemnity
agreements from the Effective Time until the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitations with respect to any Claims
against such persons arising out of such acts or omissions.
(b) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable
Law, indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide
advancement of expenses to, each Indemnified Party against all
losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities or
judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement of or in
connection with any Claim based in whole or in part on or
arising in whole or in part out of the fact that such person is
or was a director, officer or employee of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, while serving in such capacity, and
pertaining to any matter existing or occurring, or any acts or
omissions occurring, at or prior to the Effective Time, whether
asserted or claimed prior to, or at or after, the Effective Time
(including matters, acts or omissions occurring in connection
with the approval of this Agreement and the consummation of the
Transactions).
(c) For a period of six (6) years after the Effective
Time, Parent shall cause to be maintained in effect the current
policies of directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by the Company and each Company Subsidiary
(provided that Parent may substitute therefor policies
with reputable and financially sound carriers of at least the
same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which
are no less advantageous) with respect to claims arising from or
related to facts or events which occurred at or before the
Effective Time and with a total
A-59
insured coverage of $50,000,000 of directors and
officers liability insurance and $5,000,000 of fiduciary
liability insurance for such six (6) year period;
provided, however, that Parent shall not be obligated to
make aggregate premium payments for the entire six (6) year
run-off period for such insurance policies to the extent such
premiums exceed $2,200,000 (the Maximum
Premium). If such insurance coverage cannot be
obtained at all, or can only be obtained at an aggregate premium
in excess of the Maximum Premium after giving effect to any
credit obtainable from the premiums paid for the directors
and officers liability insurance and the fiduciary
liability insurance for the current year, Parent shall maintain
the most advantageous policies of directors and
officers insurance obtainable for an aggregate premium
equal to the Maximum Premium.
(d) The obligations under this Section 6.06
shall not be terminated or modified in such a manner as to
affect adversely any Indemnified Party to whom this
Section 6.06 applies without the consent of such
affected Indemnified Party (it being expressly agreed that the
Indemnified Party to whom this Section 6.06 applies
and their respective heirs, successors and assigns shall be
express third party beneficiaries of this
Section 6.06). In the event that Parent or the
Surviving Corporation (i) consolidates with or merges into
any other person and shall not be the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties
and assets to any person, then, and in each such case, proper
provision shall be made so that such continuing or surviving
corporation or entity or transferee of such assets, as the case
may be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this
Section 6.06 for the benefit of the Indemnified
Parties.
(e) This Section 6.06 shall survive the
consummation of the Merger and is intended to be for the benefit
of, and shall be enforceable by, the Indemnified Parties, their
heirs and personal representatives and shall be binding on
Parent, the Surviving Corporation and their successors and
assigns.
Section 6.07. Fees
and Expenses.
(a) Except as provided below, all fees and expenses
(including all fees and expenses of attorneys, accountants,
investment bankers, experts and consultants) incurred in
connection with the Merger shall be paid by the Party incurring
such fees or expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated,
except that expenses incurred in connection with filing,
printing and mailing of (i) the Company Proxy Statement and
the Form S-4 shall
be the sole responsibility of Parent and Sub and (ii) the
HSR filings shall be shared equally between Parent and Sub, on
the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand.
(b) If (x) (i) after the date of this Agreement,
any person makes a Company Takeover Proposal, and (ii) this
Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant to
Section 8.01(c), or (y) after the date of this
Agreement, the Company or Parent terminates this Agreement
pursuant to Section 8.01(d), then the Company shall
pay to Parent by wire transfer of same day funds a fee amount
equal to $20,476,157, which fee shall be payable and shall be
paid five (5) business days after the date of the
termination of this Agreement as provided in the foregoing
clause (x) or (y).
Section 6.08. Public
Announcements. The initial press release with respect to
the Merger and the Transactions shall be a joint press release.
Thereafter, except for any press
A-60
release concerning a Company Takeover Proposal or a withdrawal
or modification of the Company Recommendation, Parent and Sub,
on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand, shall use
reasonable efforts to consult with each other before issuing,
and provide each other reasonable opportunity to review and
comment upon, any press release or other public statements with
respect to the Merger and the other Transactions and shall use
reasonable efforts to not issue any such press release or make
any such public statement prior to such consultation, except as
may be required by applicable Law, court process or by
obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with the NYSE.
Section 6.09. Transfer
Taxes. All Transfer Taxes incurred in connection with
the Transactions shall be paid by Parent, Sub or the Surviving
Corporation, and the Company shall cooperate with the Surviving
Corporation and Parent in preparing, executing and filing any
Tax Returns with respect to such Transfer Taxes.
Section 6.10. Affiliates.
Promptly following the date of execution of this Agreement, the
Company shall deliver to Parent a letter identifying all persons
who are expected by the Company to be, at the date of the
Company Stockholders Meeting, affiliates of
the Company for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities
Act. The Company shall use all reasonable efforts to cause each
such person to deliver to Parent on or prior to the date of
mailing of the Company Proxy Statement a written affiliate
agreement substantially in the form attached as
Exhibit B.
Section 6.11. Stock
Exchange Listing and Delisting. Parent shall cause the
shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger to be
approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance, prior to the Closing Date. Parent shall cause all
shares of the Company Common Stock that are to be exchanged for
and converted into Parent Common Stock pursuant to
Section 2.01(c) to be de-listed from the NYSE and
de-registered under the Exchange Act as soon as practicable
after the Effective Time.
Section 6.12. Tax
Treatment. The Parties intend the Merger to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. Each of
Parent, Sub and the Company and each of their respective
affiliates shall not take any action and shall not fail to take
any action or suffer to exist any condition which action or
failure to act or condition would prevent, or would be
reasonably likely to prevent, the Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code.
Section 6.13. Stockholder
Litigation. The Company shall give Parent the
opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any
stockholder litigation against the Company and its directors
relating to the Merger or any other Transaction; provided,
however, that no settlement of any such obligation shall be
agreed to without Parents consent.
Section 6.14. Section 16(b).
The Boards of Directors of the Company and Parent shall, prior
to the Effective Time, take all such actions (including, if
appropriate, amending the terms of the Company Option Plan and
the related option and stock appreciation rights agreements, the
Company RSP and other compensation plans and arrangements and
all other actions necessary to give effect to the transactions
contemplated by Section 2.03) as may be necessary or
appropriate pursuant to
Rule 16b-3(d) and
Rule 16b-3(e)
promulgated under the
A-61
Exchange Act to exempt (i) the conversion of Company Common
Stock into cash or Parent Common Stock, and (ii) the
acquisition of Parent Common Stock and the right to receive
Parent Common Stock (including any Adjusted Options) pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement by officers and directors of the
Company subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act or by employees or
directors of the Company who may become an officer or director
of Parent subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Parent and the Company
shall provide to counsel to the other party copies of the
resolutions to be adopted by the respective Boards of Directors
to implement the foregoing.
Section 6.15. Notice
of Certain Events. Each of the Company and Parent shall
promptly notify the other Party of:
|
|
|
(a) any notice or other communication from any person
alleging that the consent of such person is or may be required
in connection with the Transactions if the failure of the
Company or Parent, as the case may be, to obtain such consent
would be material to the Company or Parent as applicable; |
|
|
(b) any notice or other communication from any Governmental
Entity in connection with the Transactions; |
|
|
(c) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or
proceedings commenced or, to its knowledge threatened against,
relating to or involving or otherwise affecting such party or
any of its subsidiaries which relate to the consummation of the
Transactions; or |
|
|
(d) any Company Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material
Adverse Effect, as applicable. |
Section 6.16. Payment
of Fees. On or prior to the Effective Time, the Company
shall have paid to Credit Suisse by wire transfer of immediately
available funds the fees and expense reimbursement to which it
is entitled under that certain letter agreement between the
Company and Credit Suisse dated October 10, 2005.
ARTICLE VII
Conditions Precedent
Section 7.01. Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger.
The respective obligation of each Party to effect the Merger is
subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing
Date of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Stockholder Approval. The Company shall
have obtained the Company Stockholder Approval. |
|
|
(b) NYSE Listing. The shares of Parent
Company Stock issuable to the Companys stockholders and
optionholders pursuant to this Agreement shall have been
approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance. |
|
|
(c) Consents, Approvals and Authorizations.
All consents, approvals, permits, orders or authorizations from,
and all declarations, filings and registrations with, any
Governmental |
A-62
Entity of competent jurisdiction (including, without limitation,
the Regulatory Filings), required to consummate the Merger and
the other Transactions shall have been obtained or made without
the imposition of any material conditions, other than those that
the failure to make or obtain or which would not render the
Merger illegal, and the waiting period (and any extension
thereof) applicable to the Merger under the HSR Act shall have
expired or been terminated.
|
|
|
(d) No Injunctions or Restraints. No
temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction
or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction, no
Law enacted, issued, promulgated or enforced by any Governmental
Entity or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the
consummation of the Merger shall be in effect; provided,
however, that prior to asserting this condition, subject to
Section 6.04, each of the Parties shall have used
its reasonable efforts to prevent the entry of any such
injunction or other order and to appeal as promptly as possible
any such injunction or other order that may be entered. |
|
|
(e) Form S-4;
Blue Sky. The
Form S-4 shall
have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be
the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop
order, and Parent shall have made all of the Regulatory Filings
and received all state securities or blue sky
authorizations necessary to issue Parent Common Stock pursuant
to this Agreement and to consummate the Merger and the other
Transactions. |
|
|
(f) No Litigation. There shall not be pending
or threatened any suit, action or proceeding by any Governmental
Entity or any other person, in each case that has a reasonable
likelihood of success, (i) challenging the acquisition by
Parent or Sub of any Company Common Stock, seeking to restrain
or prohibit the consummation of the Merger or any other
Transaction or seeking to obtain from the Company, Parent or Sub
any damages that are material in relation to the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries taken as a whole, (ii) seeking to
prohibit or limit in any material way the ownership or operation
by the Company, Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries
of any material portion of the business or assets of the
Company, Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries of any
material portion of the business or assets of the Company,
Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries, or to compel the
Company, Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries to
dispose of or hold separate any material portion of the business
or assets of the Company, Parent or any of their respective
subsidiaries, as a result of the Merger or any other
Transaction, (iii) seeking to impose limitations on the
ability of Parent to acquire or hold, or exercise full rights of
ownership of, any shares of Company Common Stock, including the
right to vote the Company Common Stock purchased by it on all
matters properly presented to the stockholders of the Company or
(iv) seeking to prohibit Parent or any of its subsidiaries
from effectively controlling in any material respect the
business or operations of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries. |
Section 7.02. Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and Sub. The obligations of
Parent and Sub to effect the Merger are further subject to the
satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of the Company shall be true and
correct, in each case as of the Effective Time as though such
representations and warranties were made on and as of such time
(or, to the extent such representations and warranties speak as
of an earlier date, they shall be true and correct as of |
A-63
such earlier date), except where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct,
individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not have
a Company Material Adverse Effect.
|
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have performed in all
material respects all agreements, covenants and obligations
required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior
to the Closing Date, and Parent shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of the Company by an executive
officer of the Company to such effect. |
|
|
(c) Absence of Company Material Adverse
Effect. Except as disclosed in the Company Disclosure
Letter, since the date of this Agreement, there shall not have
occurred any Company Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(d) Tax Opinion. Parent shall have received a
written opinion, dated as of the Closing Date, from Lord,
Bissell and Brook LLP, counsel to Parent, to the effect that the
Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, and that Parent, Sub and the Company will each be a Party
to that reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b)
of the Code. In rendering such opinion, such tax counsel may
rely upon representations contained herein and may receive and
rely upon representations from Parent, the Company and others,
including representations from Parent substantially similar to
the representations in the Parent Tax Certificate attached
hereto as Exhibit C and representations from the
Company substantially similar to the representations in the
Company Tax Certificate attached hereto as Exhibit D. |
|
|
(e) Company Officers Certificates.
Parent shall have received certificates signed on behalf of the
Company by an executive officer of the Company, dated as of the
Closing Date, to the effect that the conditions set forth in
Sections 7.02(a) and 7.02(b) have been
satisfied. |
Section 7.03. Conditions
to Obligation of the Company. The obligation of the
Company to effect the Merger is further subject to the
satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Parent and Sub shall be true
and correct, in each case as of the Effective Time as though
such representations and warranties were made on and as of such
time (or, to the extent such representations and warranties
speak as of an earlier date, they shall be true and correct as
of such earlier date), except where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct,
individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not have
a Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of Parent and
Sub. Parent and Sub shall have performed in all material
respects all agreements, covenants and obligations required to
be performed by them under this Agreement at or prior to the
Closing Date, and the Company shall have received a certificate
signed on behalf of Parent by an executive officer of Parent to
such effect. |
A-64
|
|
|
(c) Absence of Parent Material Adverse
Effect. Except as disclosed in the Parent Disclosure
Letter, since the date of this Agreement, there shall not have
any Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(d) Tax Opinion. The Company shall have
received a written opinion, dated as of the Closing Date, from
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, counsel to the Company, to the
effect that the Merger will be treated for Federal income tax
purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and that Parent, Sub and the
Company will each be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. In rendering such
opinion, such tax counsel may rely upon representations
contained herein and may receive and rely upon representations
from Parent, the Company and other, including representations
from Parent substantially similar to the representations in the
Parent Tax Certificate attached hereto as Exhibit C
and representations from the Company substantially similar to
the representation in the Company Tax Certificate attached
hereto as Exhibit D. |
|
|
(e) Parent Officers Certificates. The
Company shall have received certificates signed on behalf of
Parent by an executive officer of Parent, dated as of the
Closing Date, to the effect that the conditions set forth in
Sections 7.03(a) and 7.03(b) have been
satisfied. |
Section 7.04. Frustration
of Closing Conditions. None of the Company, Parent or
Sub may rely on the failure of any condition set forth in
Section 7.01, 7.02 or 7.03, as the
case may be, to be satisfied if such failure was caused by such
Partys failure to use all reasonable efforts to consummate
the Merger and the other Transactions to be performed or
consummated by such Party in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement as required by and subject to Section 6.04.
ARTICLE VIII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
Section 8.01. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time, by action taken or authorized by the Board of
Directors of the terminating Party or Parties, whether before or
after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval:
|
|
|
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent, Sub and the
Company; |
|
|
(b) by either Parent or the Company: |
|
|
|
(i) if the Merger is not consummated on or before
June 2, 2006 (the Outside
Date), unless the failure to consummate the
Merger is the result of a willful and material breach of this
Agreement by the Party seeking to terminate this Agreement; |
|
|
(ii) if any Governmental Entity issues an order, decree or
ruling or takes any other action permanently enjoining,
restraining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such order,
decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and
nonappealable; or |
|
|
(iii) if, upon a vote at a duly held meeting to obtain the
Company Stockholders Meeting, the Company Stockholder
Approval is not obtained; |
A-65
|
|
|
(c) by Parent, if (i) the Company Board shall have
withdrawn or adversely modified the Company Recommendation or
(ii) the Company Board shall have recommended to the
Companys stockholders that they approve a Company Takeover
Proposal other than the Merger; |
|
|
(d) by the Company, subject to compliance with
Section 5.02(b), or by Parent, if the Company Board
determines to accept a Superior Company Proposal (with such
termination becoming effective upon the Company entering into a
binding written agreement with respect to such Superior Company
Proposal); |
|
|
(e) by Parent, if the Company breaches or fails to perform
in any material respect any of its representations, warranties
or covenants contained in this Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform (i) would give rise to the failure of a
condition set forth in Sections 7.02(a), 7.02(b) or
7.02(c) and (ii) cannot be or has not been cured
within thirty (30) days after the giving of written notice
to the Company of such breach; or |
|
|
(f) by the Company, if Parent breaches or fails to perform
in any material respect of any of its representations,
warranties or covenants contained in this Agreement, which
breach or failure to perform (i) would give rise to the
failure of a condition set forth in Section 7.03(a),
7.03(b) or 7.03(c) and (ii) cannot be or has
not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written
notice to Parent of such breach. |
Section 8.02. Effect
of Termination. In the event of termination of this
Agreement by either the Company or Parent and abandonment of the
Merger as provided in Section 8.01, this Agreement
shall forthwith become void and have no effect, and no Party (or
any of its directors or officers) shall have any liability or
obligation to any other Party, other than
Section 3.21, Section 4.18,
Section 4.20, the last sentence of
Section 6.03, Section 6.04(b),
Section 6.07, this Section 8.02 and
Article IX, which provisions shall survive such
termination, and except to the extent that such termination
results from the breach of Section 4.20 or
6.04(b), fraud by a Party or the willful and material
breach by a Party of any other representation, warranty or
covenant set forth in this Agreement.
Section 8.03. Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by the Parties at any time before
or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval;
provided, however, that (i) after receipt of the
Company Stockholder Approval, there shall be made no amendment
that by Law requires further approval by the stockholders of the
Company without the further approval of such stockholders,
(ii) no amendment shall be made to this Agreement after the
Effective Time and (iii) except as provided above no
amendment of this Agreement by the Company shall require the
approval of the stockholders of the Company. This Agreement may
not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on
behalf of each of the Parties.
Section 8.04. Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the
Parties may (a) extend the time for the performance of any
of the obligations or other acts of the other Parties,
(b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties of the other Parties contained in this Agreement or
in any document delivered pursuant to this Agreement or
(c) subject to the proviso in Section 8.03,
waive compliance by the other Parties with any of the agreements
or conditions contained in this Agreement. Subject to the
proviso in Section 8.03, no extension or waiver by
the Company shall require the approval of the stockholders of the
A-66
Company. Any agreement on the part of a Party to any such
extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of such Party. The
failure of any Party to this Agreement to assert any of its
rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a
waiver of such rights.
Section 8.05. Procedure
for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver. A
termination of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.01, an amendment of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 8.03 or an extension or waiver
pursuant to Section 8.04 shall, in order to be
effective, require in the case of Parent, Sub or the Company,
action by its Board of Directors or the duly authorized designee
of its Board of Directors. Termination of this Agreement prior
to the Effective Time shall not require the approval of the
stockholders of the Company or Parent.
ARTICLE IX
General Provisions
Section 9.01. Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties. None of the
representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive
the Effective Time. This Section 9.01 shall not
limit any covenant or agreement of the Parties which by its
terms contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
Section 9.02. Notices.
All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications
under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given (a) upon personal delivery, (b) one
(1) business day after being sent via a nationally
recognized overnight courier service if overnight courier
service is requested or (c) upon receipt of electronic or
other confirmation of transmission if sent via facsimile, in
each case at the addresses or fax numbers (or at such other
address or fax number for a Party as shall be specified by like
notice) set forth below:
|
|
|
(a) if to Parent or Sub, to |
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
Attention: David H. Hannah, Chief Executive Officer |
|
Kay Rustand, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel |
|
Fax No.: (213) 687-8792
|
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP |
|
300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 800 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
Attention: David R. Decker, Esq. |
|
Fax No.: (213) 485-1200
|
A-67
|
|
|
(b) if to the Company, to |
|
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
10650 Alameda Street |
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
|
Attention: William S. Johnson |
|
Fax No.: (323) 567-1034 |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
|
Attention: Mark A. Conley, Esq. |
|
Fax No.: (310) 712-8225 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Kelso & Company, L.P. |
|
320 Park Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
Attention: James J. Connors, II, Esq. |
|
Fax No.: (212) 223-2379 |
Section 9.03. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule or Law, or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so
long as the economic or legal substance of the Transactions is
not affected in any manner materially adverse to any Party. Upon
such determination that any term or other provision is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall
negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect
the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an
acceptable manner to the end that the Transactions are fulfilled
to the extent possible.
Section 9.04. Counterparts;
Facsimile. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same
agreement and shall become effective when one or more
counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties. Facsimile transmission of any
signed original document and/or retransmission of any signed
facsimile transmission will be deemed the same as delivery of an
original. At the request of any Party, the parties will confirm
facsimile transmission by signing a duplicate original document.
Section 9.05. Entire
Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement,
taken together with the Company Disclosure Letter, the Parent
Disclosure Letter, the Confidentiality Agreement and the Voting
Agreement, constitute the entire agreement and supersede all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
among the parties with respect to the Merger and are not
intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto
any rights or remedies hereunder, except as provided in
Sections 6.05 and 6.06.
A-68
Section 9.06. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware,
regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under
applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
Section 9.07. Assignment.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or
in part, by operation of law or otherwise by any of the Parties
without the prior written consent of the other Parties, except
that Sub may assign, in its sole discretion, any of or all its
rights, interests and obligations under this Agreement to Parent
or to any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent,
but no such assignment shall relieve Sub of any of its
obligations under this Agreement. Any purported assignment
without any required consent shall be void. Subject to the
preceding sentences, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure
to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section 9.08. Enforcement.
The Parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the
event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the Parties
shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms
and provisions of this Agreement in any California state court
or any Federal court located in the County of Los Angeles in the
State of California, this being in addition to any other remedy
to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In addition,
each of the Parties hereto (a) consents to submit itself to
the personal jurisdiction of any California state court or any
Federal court located in the County of Los Angeles in the State
of California in the event any dispute arises out of this
Agreement or the Merger, (b) agrees that it will not
attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion
or other request for leave from any such court, (c) agrees
that it will not bring any action relating to this Agreement or
the Merger in any court other than any California state court or
any Federal court sitting in the County of Los Angeles in the
State of California and (d) waives any right to trial by
jury with respect to any action related to or arising out of
this Agreement or the Merger.
[The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.
Signature page follows.]
A-69
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Sub and the Company have duly
executed this Agreement, all as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
PARENT: |
|
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO., |
|
a California corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: David H. Hannah |
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Karla Lewis |
|
Title: Executive Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
SUB: |
|
|
RSAC ACQUISITION CORP., |
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: David H. Hannah |
|
Title: President |
|
|
COMPANY: |
|
|
EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY, |
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. |
A-70
ANNEX B
VOTING AGREEMENT
VOTING AGREEMENT, dated as of January 17, 2006 (this
Agreement), among Reliance Steel &
Aluminum Co., a California corporation
(Buyer), and each of the stockholders of
Earle M. Jorgensen Company, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), whose names appear on the signature
pages of this Agreement (each, a Stockholder
and, collectively, the Stockholders) (the
Company and the Stockholders are collectively referred to
hereafter each as a Party and collectively as
the Parties). Capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings
attributed to them in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, Buyer, RSAC Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
and wholly owned subsidiary of Buyer (Merger
Sub), and the Company entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (as amended from time to time, the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which the
Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub (the
Merger), and Merger Sub will be the surviving
corporation and a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Buyer;
WHEREAS, each Stockholder is the owner of Company Common Stock
that will be cancelled in connection with the Merger in exchange
for the Merger Consideration; and
WHEREAS, as an inducement and a condition to entering into the
Merger Agreement, Buyer has required that the Stockholders
agree, and the Stockholders have agreed, to enter into this
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Stockholders hereby agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I
Agreements of the Parties
1.1 Voting of Company Common Stock. During
the period commencing on the date hereof and continuing until
this Agreement is terminated in accordance with
Section 3.2 below (the Support
Period), at any meeting (whether annual or special and
whether or not an adjourned or postponed meeting) of the holders
of capital stock of the Company, however called, or in
connection with any written consent of the holders of capital
stock of the Company, each Stockholder agrees that it will
appear at the meeting or otherwise cause all outstanding shares
of Company Common Stock, beneficially owned by such Stockholder
as of the date of this Agreement, which shares are set forth
opposite such Stockholders name on Schedule I
to this Agreement, together with any other shares of Company
Common Stock acquired by such Stockholder during the Support
Period (such shares of Company Common Stock, collectively, the
Shares), to be counted as present thereat for
purposes of establishing a quorum and vote or consent (or cause
to be voted or consented) the Shares (a) in favor of the
adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the Merger,
the other Transactions and any actions reasonably required in
furtherance thereof and (b) except as otherwise agreed to
in writing in advance by Buyer in its sole discretion, against
the following actions (other than the Merger and the other
Transactions): (i) any Company Takeover Proposal;
(ii) any amendment of the Company Charter or the Company
Bylaws; (iii) any other action which is designed to or
would impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or materially
adversely affect the Merger and the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the Merger Agreement; or (iv) any change
in any form or manner of the voting rights of any class of
capital stock of
B-1
the Company. During the Support Period, each Stockholder agrees
that it will not enter into any agreement or understanding with
any person the effect of which would be inconsistent with or
violative of any provision contained in this
Section 1.1.
1.2 Restrictions on Transfer. During the
Support Period, each Stockholder agrees that it will not offer
for sale, sell, transfer, tender, pledge, encumber, assign or
otherwise dispose of (collectively,
Transfer), or enter into any contract, option
or other arrangement or understanding with respect to or consent
to the Transfer of, any or all of the Shares or any interest
therein except as provided in Section 1.1 or the
Merger Agreement; provided, however, that each
Stockholder shall be permitted to distribute Shares to its
general partners or limited partners if and only if such general
partners or limited partners agree in writing to be bound by the
restrictions set forth in this Agreement with respect to such
Shares. Without limiting the generality or effect of the
foregoing, during the Support Period and except as contemplated
by this Agreement, each Stockholder agrees that it will not
(a) grant any proxies or powers of attorney, deposit its
Shares into a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement with
respect to its Shares or (b) take any action that would
make any representation or warranty of such Stockholder
contained herein untrue or incorrect.
1.3 Company Takeover Proposals.
(a) During the Support Period, each Stockholder agrees that
it shall not, and shall not authorize any of its respective
directors, officers, employees, counsel, advisors, agents,
partners or other representatives
(Representatives) to, directly or indirectly,
take any action to (i) solicit, initiate, negotiate,
encourage or provide any confidential information to facilitate
the submission of any Company Takeover Proposal, (ii) enter
into any agreement with respect to any Company Takeover Proposal
or (iii) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect
to, or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the
making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Company Takeover Proposal.
(b) During the Support Period, each Stockholder shall
immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or
negotiations between such Stockholder and any Person (other than
Buyer or Merger Sub) that may be ongoing with respect to any
Company Takeover Proposal (other than the Merger).
(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, (i) each Stockholder is entering into this
Agreement, and agreeing to become bound hereby, solely in its
capacity as a stockholder of the Company and not in any other
capacity (including without limitation any capacity as a
director of the Company), and the actions of any Representative
on behalf of each Stockholder shall be restricted only in
connection with such Stockholders capacity as a
stockholder of the Company shall be restricted, and
(ii) nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to
(A) require any Stockholder or Representative who is also a
member of the Company Board to take any action or refrain from
taking any action in his or her capacity as a member of the
Company Board to the extent such action is permitted by the
Merger Agreement or required by applicable Law or
(B) restrict any Stockholder or Representative in his or
her exercise of his or her fiduciary duties as a director of the
Company.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
Section 1.1 or this Section 1.3, if the
Company Board has entered into discussions or negotiations with,
or provided non-public information to, any person in response to
a Company Takeover Proposal by such person in compliance with
the provisions of Section 5.02 of the Merger
Agreement, each Stockholder may provide information and engage
in discussions or negotiations with such person as and to the
extent that the Company is permitted to do so pursuant to the
terms of the Merger Agreement.
B-2
1.4 Disclosure. Each Stockholder hereby
agrees to permit the Company and Buyer to publish and disclose
in the Company Proxy Statement, the
Form S-4 and any
press release (including if required to file with the SEC on
Form 8-K) which
Buyer or the Company, in compliance with
Section 6.08 of the Merger Agreement, determines to
be necessary or desirable in connection with the Merger and the
other Transactions, such Stockholders identity and
ownership of Company Common Stock, as applicable, and the nature
of its representations, warranties and covenants set forth in
this Agreement. Buyer and the Company will provide each
Stockholder with a copy of any proposed disclosure and provide
each Stockholder with a reasonable opportunity to comment
thereon. Except as required by law and except for disclosure to
its Representatives, each Stockholder hereby agrees not to issue
or cause to be issued, published or disclosed any press release,
announcement or other information regarding this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby without the prior approval
of Buyer.
ARTICLE II
Representations and Warranties
2.1 Representations and Warranties of
Stockholders. As of the date of this Agreement, each
Stockholder, severally and not jointly, hereby represents and
warrants to Buyer as follows as to itself:
|
|
|
(a) Ownership of Shares. Such Stockholder is the
sole record owner and the direct beneficial owner of the number
of outstanding shares of Company Common Stock listed on
Schedule I opposite such Stockholders name, as
Schedule I shall be updated from time to time to
reflect any acquisitions of Company Common Stock by such
Stockholder after the date of this Agreement. |
|
|
(b) Authority; No Violation. The execution, delivery
and performance of this Agreement by such Stockholder and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby are within
its legal power and have been duly and validly authorized by all
necessary action on the part of such Stockholder. This Agreement
has been duly executed and delivered by such Stockholder, and
(assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by Buyer)
constitutes the valid and binding obligation of such
Stockholder, enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance
with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other
similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by the application of
general principles of equity. |
|
|
(c) No Conflicts. The execution, delivery and
performance by such Stockholder of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and
will not (i) conflict with or result in a breach of the
limited partnership agreement or other organizational documents
of such Stockholder, (ii) conflict with, breach or result
in a default (or give rise to any right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration or result in the creation of any
Lien upon any of the properties or assets of such Stockholder)
under any of the provisions of any note, bond, lease, mortgage,
indenture or any license, franchise, permit, agreement or other
instrument or obligation, including, without limitation, any
voting agreement, stockholders agreement or voting trust,
to which such Stockholder is a party or by which such
Stockholder or any of its properties or assets is bound or
(iii) violate any Laws applicable to such Stockholder or
its properties or assets, except where the occurrence of any of
the foregoing described in clauses (ii) or
(iii) above, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on such
Stockholders ability to perform its obligations under this
Agreement in a full and timely manner. Except for (A) any
Permits required under the Exchange Act, including, without
limitation, an amendment to Schedule 13D, and (B) such
Permits of which, individually or in the aggregate, the failure
to obtain would not reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect on such Stockholders ability to perform its
obligations hereunder in a full and timely manner, no Permit is
required in connection with the execution, delivery |
B-3
and performance by such Stockholder of this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
|
|
|
(d) No Liens. The Shares are, and at all times
during the Support Period will be, beneficially owned by such
Stockholder, free and clear of all Liens, proxies and voting
trusts, agreements, understandings or arrangements, except for
any such Liens or proxies arising hereunder. |
2.2 Representations and
Warranties of Buyer. Buyer hereby represents and
warrants to each Stockholder as follows:
|
|
|
(a) Authority; No Violation. The execution, delivery
and performance of this Agreement by Buyer and the consummation
of the transactions contemplated herby are within its corporate
power and have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of Buyer. This Agreement has been
duly executed and delivered by Buyer, and (assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by each Stockholder)
constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Buyer,
enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its terms, except
as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and by the application of general principles of equity. |
|
|
(b) No Conflicts. The execution, delivery and
performance by Buyer of this Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not
(i) conflict with or result in a breach of the Parent
Charter or the Parent Bylaws, (ii) conflict with, breach or
result in a default (or give rise to any right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration) under any of the provisions of any
note, bond, lease, mortgage, indenture or any license,
franchise, permit, agreement or other instrument or obligation
to which Buyer is a party or by which Buyer or any of its
properties or assets is bound or (iii) violate any Laws
applicable to Buyer or its properties or assets, except whether
the occurrence of any of the foregoing described in
clauses (ii) or (iii) above would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on Buyers
ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement in a
full and timely manner. Except for (A) any Permits required
under the Exchange Act and (B) such Permits of which,
individually or in the aggregate, the failure to obtain would
not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on
Buyers ability to perform its obligations hereunder in a
full and timely manner, no Permit is required in connection with
the execution, delivery and performance by Buyer of this
Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby. |
ARTICLE III
Other Agreements
3.1 Stop Transfer.
(a) Each Stockholder agrees with, and covenants to, Buyer
that such Stockholder will not request that the Company register
the Transfer (book-entry or otherwise) of any certificate or
uncertificated interest representing any of the Shares, unless
such Transfer is made in compliance with this Agreement.
(b) In the event of a stock dividend or distribution, or
any change in Company Common Stock by reason of any stock
dividend, split-up, recapitalization, combination, exchange of
shares or the like, (i) the terms Company Common
Stock and Shares will be deemed to
refer to and include the shares of Company Common Stock, as the
case may be, issued or received in respect of such shares as a
result of any such stock dividend or distribution and any shares
into which or for which any or all of the Shares may be changed
or exchanged and (ii) appropriate adjustments will be made
to the terms and provisions of this Agreement to reflect the
foregoing.
B-4
3.2 Termination. This
Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (a) the
Effective Time, (b) termination of the Merger Agreement in
accordance with Article VIII thereof, (c) the
Company Board withdrawing or adversely modifying the Company
Recommendation in accordance with Section 5.02(b) of the
Merger Agreement and (d) at each Stockholders option
(but only with respect to such Stockholder), upon notice by such
Stockholder to Buyer from and after any amendment or
modification of the Merger Agreement that (i) extends the
Outside Date or (ii) otherwise materially and adversely
affects such Stockholder, including, without limitation, by
changing the form of, or decreasing the amount of, the Merger
Consideration.
ARTICLE IV
General Provisions
4.1 Modification or
Amendment. Subject to the provisions of applicable Law,
during the Support Period, this Agreement may be amended,
modified or supplemented (a) with respect to any individual
Stockholder, only with the written consent of Buyer and each
such Stockholder and (b) with respect to all of the
Parties, only with the written consent of Buyer and all of the
Stockholders.
4.2 Waiver of
Conditions. The conditions to each of the Parties
obligations to perform the agreements herein are for the sole
benefit of each such Party and may be waived in writing solely
by such Party, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by
applicable Law.
4.3 Expenses and
Fees. All costs and expenses incurred in connection with
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will be borne and paid by the Party incurring such
expense; provided, however, that all reasonable fees and
expenses of the Stockholders joint counsel,
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, that are incurred in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be borne and paid by the Company.
4.4 Notices. All
notices, requests, claims, demands, consents, approvals, waivers
and other communications under this Agreement shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given (a) upon personal
delivery, (b) one (1) business day after being sent via a
nationally recognized overnight courier service if overnight
courier service is requested or (c) upon receipt of
electronic or other confirmation of transmission if sent via
facsimile, in each case at the addresses or fax numbers (or at
such other address or fax number for a Party as shall be
specified by like notice) set forth on the signature pages
hereto (or at such other address for a Party as specified in
writing by such requesting Party to the other Parties).
4.5 Severability. If
any term or other provision of this Agreement is determined to
be invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule
of law or public policy, all other terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Upon such
determination, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith to
modify this Agreement so as to give effect to the original
intent of the Parties to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable Law.
4.6 Interpretation.
(a) The Parties and their respective legal counsel have
participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this
Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as
drafted jointly by the Parties with the advice and participation
of legal counsel and no presumption or burden of proof shall
arise favoring or disfavoring any Party by virtue of the
authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
B-5
(b) For purposes of this Agreement: (i) the headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and
shall in no way modify or restrict any of the terms or
provisions hereof, (ii) except as expressly provided
herein, the terms include, includes or
including are not limiting, (iii) the words
hereof and herein and words of similar
import shall, unless otherwise stated, be construed to refer to
this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of
this Agreement, (iv) article, section, paragraph, exhibit,
annex and schedule references are to the articles, sections,
paragraphs, exhibits, annexes and schedules of this Agreement
unless otherwise specified, (v) the meaning assigned to
each term deemed herein shall be equally applicable to both the
singular and plural forms of such term, and words denoting any
gender shall include all genders, (vi) a reference to any
Party or any party to any other agreement or document shall
include such Partys or partys successors and
permitted assigns and (vii) a reference to any Laws or
other legislation or to any provision of any Law or legislation
shall include any amendment to, and any modification or
re-enactment thereof, any provision substituted therefor and all
regulations and statutory instruments issued thereunder or
pursuant thereto.
(c) Notwithstanding, anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, Buyer acknowledges and agrees that the obligations of
each Stockholder under this Agreement are several obligations
and not joint obligations.
4.7 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts
(including by facsimile), each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
4.8 Entire Agreement.
This Agreement and the Merger Agreement (including the documents
and the instruments referred to in this Agreement and the Merger
Agreement and any schedules or exhibits attached hereto or
thereto) constitute the entire agreement and supersede all prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the
Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
4.9 Governing Law; Injunctive
Relief; Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial.
(a) THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, REGARDLESS
OF THE LAWS THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE GOVERN UNDER APPLICABLE
PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THEREOF.
(a) THE PARTIES AGREE THAT IRREPARABLE DAMAGE WOULD OCCUR
IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT WERE
NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS OR WERE
OTHERWISE BREACHED. IT IS ACCORDINGLY AGREED THAT THE PARTIES
SHALL BE ENTITLED TO SEEK AN INJUNCTION OR INJUNCTIONS TO
PREVENT BREACHES OF THIS AGREEMENT AND TO ENFORCE SPECIFICALLY
THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT IN THE COURT OF
CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. THIS BEING IN ADDITION TO ANY
OTHER REMEDY TO WHICH THEY ARE ENTITLED AT LAW OR IN EQUITY. IN
ADDITION, EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO (i) CONSENTS TO SUBMIT
ITSELF TO THE PERSONAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE EVENT ANY DISPUTE ARISES OUT OF
THIS AGREEMENT, (ii) AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO
DENY OR DEFEAT SUCH PERSONAL JURISDICTION BY MOTION OR OTHER
REQUEST FOR LEAVE FROM ANY SUCH COURT AND (iii) AGREES THAT
IT WILL NOT BRING ANY ACTION RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT IN ANY
COURT OTHER THAN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE.
B-6
4.10 Waiver of Jury
Trial. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY
WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL
PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
4.11 Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations under this Agreement may be assigned or delegated by
any of the Parties (whether by operation of law or otherwise)
without the prior written consent of the Stockholders, in the
case of Buyer, or Buyer, in the case of the Stockholders, except
that this Agreement may be assigned by Buyer to a wholly owned
subsidiary of Buyer. Subject to the preceding sentence, this
Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by each of the Parties and their respective
successors and assigns. This Agreement (including the documents
and instruments referred to in this Agreement) is not intended
to and does not confer upon any third party other than the
Parties any rights or remedies under this Agreement. Each
Stockholder agrees that this Agreement and the obligations
hereunder will attach to the Shares and will be binding upon any
person to which legal or beneficial ownership of such Shares
will pass, whether by operation of law or otherwise, including
without limitation such Stockholders legal representatives
or successors or other transferees (for value or otherwise) and
any other successors in interest.
4.12 Merger Agreement. Buyer acknowledges
that the Stockholders have been induced to enter into this
Agreement based on the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement.
[The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.
Signature pages follow.]
B-7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Buyer and the Stockholders have caused this
Voting Agreement to be executed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written.
|
|
|
BUYER: |
|
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Address for Notice: |
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
|
|
|
Attention: |
David H. Hannah, Chief Executive
Officer
Kay Rustand, Esq. Vice President and
General Counsel |
B-8
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
Kelso Partners I, L.P., General Partner |
|
|
By: |
/s/ Frank T. Nickell |
|
|
|
c/o Kelso & Company |
|
320 Park Avenue, 24th Floor |
|
New York, NY 10022 |
|
Attention: James J. Connors, II |
|
Fax: (212) 223-2379 |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP |
|
919 Third Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
Attention: Richard D. Bohm |
|
Fax: (212) 521-7226 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
|
Attention: Mark A. Conley |
|
Fax: (310) 712-8225 |
B-9
|
|
|
KELSO EQUITY PARTNERS II, L.P. |
|
|
|
c/o Kelso & Company |
|
320 Park Avenue, 24th Floor |
|
New York, NY 10022 |
|
Attention: James J. Connors, II |
|
Fax: (212) 223-2379 |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP |
|
919 Third Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
Attention: Richard D. Bohm |
|
Fax: (212) 521-7226 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
|
Attention: Mark A. Conley |
|
Fax: (310) 712-8225 |
B-10
|
|
|
KIA III-EARLE M. JORGENSEN, L.P. |
|
|
By: Kelso Partners III, L.P., General Partner |
|
|
|
c/o Kelso & Company |
|
320 Park Avenue, 24th Floor |
|
New York, NY 10022 |
|
Attention: James J. Connors, II |
|
Fax: (212) 223-2379 |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP |
|
919 Third Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
Attention: Richard D. Bohm |
|
Fax: (212) 521-7226 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
|
Attention: Mark A. Conley |
|
Fax: (310) 712-8225 |
B-11
|
|
|
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES IV, L.P. |
|
|
By: Kelso Partners IV, L.P., General Partner |
|
|
|
c/o Kelso & Company |
|
320 Park Avenue, 24th Floor |
|
New York, NY 10022 |
|
Attention: James J. Connors, II |
|
Fax: (212) 223-2379 |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP |
|
919 Third Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
Attention: Richard D. Bohm |
|
Fax: (212) 521-7226 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
|
Attention: Mark A. Conley |
|
Fax: (310) 712-8225 |
B-12
Schedule I
Ownership of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of Company Common Stock | |
|
|
Beneficially Owned and Subject to this Agreement | |
|
|
| |
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
|
1,012,468 |
|
|
KELSO EQUITY PARTNERS II, L.P.
|
|
|
11,616 |
|
|
KIA III-EARLE M. JORGENSEN, L.P.
|
|
|
1,704,740 |
|
|
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES IV, L.P.
|
|
|
22,442,810 |
|
B-13
ANNEX C
January 17, 2006
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, CA 90262
Members of the Board:
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of common stock,
par value $0.001 per share (Company Common
Stock), of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (the
Company), other than Reliance Steel &
Aluminum Co. (the Acquiror) and its subsidiaries,
Kelso Investment Associates, L.P., Kelso Equity
Partners II, L.P., KIA III-Earle M. Jorgensen,
L.P., Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P., and their respective
affiliates (collectively, the Excluded Persons), of
the Merger Consideration (as defined below) set forth in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 17, 2006
(the Merger Agreement), among the Company, the
Acquiror and RSAC Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Acquiror (the Sub). The Merger Agreement
provides for, among other things, the merger of the Company with
and into the Sub (the Merger) pursuant to which the
Sub will be the surviving entity and each outstanding share of
Company Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive
(i) $6.50 in cash (the Cash Consideration) and
(ii) a fraction of a share (Exchange Ratio) of
common stock (the Stock Consideration and, together
with the Cash Consideration, the Merger
Consideration), no par value (Acquiror Common
Stock), of the Acquiror determined by dividing the Cash
Consideration by the average of the daily closing sale prices
(the Average Price) for Acquiror Common Stock on the
New York Stock Exchange for each of the 20 consecutive trading
days ending with and including the second trading day prior to
the closing of the Merger; provided that if the Average Price is
greater than or equal to $72.86, then the Exchange Ratio shall
be 0.0892 shares of Acquiror Common Stock for each share
Company Common Stock and if the Average Price is less than or
equal to $53.86, then the Exchange Ratio shall be
0.1207 shares of Acquiror Common Stock for each share of
Company Common Stock.
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed the Merger
Agreement, certain related agreements and certain publicly
available business and financial information relating to the
Company and the Acquiror. We have also reviewed certain other
information relating to the Company and the Acquiror, including
financial forecasts, provided to or discussed with us by the
Company and the Acquiror, and have met with the managements of
the Company and the Acquiror to discuss the business and
prospects of the Company and the Acquiror, respectively. We have
also considered certain financial and stock market data of the
Company and the Acquiror, and we have compared that data with
similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses we
deemed similar to those of the Company and the Acquiror, and we
have considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other business combinations and other
transactions which have recently been effected or announced. We
also considered such other information, financial studies,
analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market
criteria which we deemed relevant.
In connection with our review, we have not assumed any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
foregoing information and have relied on such information being
complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to
the financial forecasts for the
C-1
Company and the Acquiror that we have reviewed, the managements
of the Company and the Acquiror have advised us, and we have
assumed, that such forecasts have been reasonably prepared on
bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the managements of the Company and the Acquiror as
to the future financial performance of the Company and the
Acquiror, respectively. We have assumed, with your consent, that
the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. We also have assumed, with your consent, that, in the
course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or third party
consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the Merger,
no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or condition
will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the
Company, the Acquiror or the contemplated benefits of the Merger
and that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the
terms of the Merger Agreement without waiver, modification or
amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof.
In addition, we have not been requested to make, and have not
made, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or the
Acquiror, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations
or appraisals. Our opinion addresses only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock,
other than Excluded Persons, of the Merger Consideration and
does not address any other aspect or implication of the Merger
or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered
into in connection with the Merger or otherwise. Our opinion is
necessarily based upon information made available to us as of
the date hereof and financial, economic, market and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date
hereof. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value
of shares of Acquiror Common Stock actually will be when issued
to the holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger or
the prices at which shares of Acquiror Common Stock will trade
at any time. Our opinion does not address the relative merits of
the Merger as compared to other business strategies or
transactions that might be available to the Company, nor does it
address the underlying business decision of the Company to
proceed with the Merger.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection
with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a
significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Merger. We will also receive a fee upon rendering this
opinion. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for
certain liabilities and other items arising out of our
engagement. From time to time, we and our affiliates have in the
past provided, are currently providing and in the future may
provide, investment banking and other financial services to the
Company, the Acquiror, the private investment firms whose
affiliates are stockholders of the Company, and their respective
affiliates, unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which we have
received, and would expect to receive, compensation. We are a
full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and
other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, we
and our affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for our and our
affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity,
debt and other securities and financial instruments (including
bank loans and other obligations) of the Company, the Acquiror
and any other company that may be involved in the Merger and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities, as well as provide investment banking and other
financial services to such companies. In addition, funds managed
or advised by us or one or more of our affiliates have
investments in funds managed or advised by affiliates of certain
stockholders of the Company, including Kelso Investment
Associates IV, L.P.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its
evaluation of the Merger and does not constitute a
recommendation to any
C-2
stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any
matter relating to the proposed Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock,
other than the Excluded Persons.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
C-3
ANNEX D
January 17, 2006
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Gentlemen:
The Board of Directors of Earle M. Jorgensen Company
(EMJ) has engaged Duff & Phelps Securities,
LLC (Duff & Phelps) as its independent
financial advisor to provide an opinion (the
Opinion) in connection with a proposed transaction
(Proposed Transaction), which is described below.
Specifically, Duff & Phelps has been asked to provide
its opinion as to the fairness of the Proposed Transaction to
the shareholders of EMJ, other than Reliance Steel &
Aluminum Co. and its subsidiaries, Kelso Investment Associates,
L.P., Kelso Equity Partners, L.P., KIA III-Earle M.
Jorgensen, L.P., Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P., and their
respective affiliates (collectively, the Excluded
Persons), from a financial point of view (without giving
effect to any impact of the Proposed Transaction on any
particular shareholder other than in its capacity as a
shareholder).
Description of the Proposed Transaction
Based on our review of the draft Agreement and Plan of Merger
(Merger Agreement), dated January 16, 2006, it
is Duff & Phelps understanding that the Proposed
Transaction entails the merger of EMJ with and into a wholly
owned subsidiary (Merger Sub) of Reliance Steel and
Aluminum Co. (Reliance) on the following terms:
|
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the Proposed Transaction (the
Effective Time), the separate corporate existence of
the EMJ will cease and the Merger Sub will continue as the
surviving entity, and succeed to and assume all of the rights
and obligations of EMJ. |
|
|
|
Each outstanding share of EMJ common stock will be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive a combination of $6.50 in
cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock (the
Stock Consideration). |
D-1
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
January 17, 2006
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to the Stock Consideration, the merger exchange
ratio will depend upon the average of the daily closing price
for Reliance common stock for each of the 20 consecutive trading
days ending with and including the second trading day prior to
the Effective Time (the Average Parent Stock Price).
The merger exchange ratio will be calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
If the Average Parent Stock Price is less than $72.86 (the
Upper Limit), but greater than $53.86 (the
Lower Limit), then the merger exchange ratio will be
calculated by dividing $6.50 by the Average Parent Stock Price. |
|
|
|
If the Average Parent Stock Price is equal to or greater than
the Upper Limit, then the merger exchange ratio will be
calculated by dividing $6.50 by the Upper Limit. |
|
|
|
If the Average Parent Stock Price is equal to or less than the
Lower Limit, then the merger exchange ratio will be calculated
by dividing $6.50 by the Lower Limit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Each outstanding EMJ stock option granted pursuant to the Earle
M. Jorgensen Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan will be converted
into an option to purchase common stock of Reliance, subject to
adjustments in exercise price and number of shares. |
|
|
|
Each outstanding EMJ stock option granted pursuant to the Earle
M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc. Stock Option Plan will be
converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to:
(1) the difference between $13.00 and the exercise price of
such option, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ
common stock subject to such option. |
|
|
|
With respect to EMJs outstanding obligation to contribute
723,109 shares of its common stock to its retirement
savings plan, Reliance will guarantee such obligation, but will
substitute its own common stock for EMJs in fulfilling the
obligation, subject to adjustment in the number of shares
contributed to reflect the merger exchange ratio. |
Scope of Analysis
In connection with this Opinion, we have made such reviews,
analyses, and inquiries as we have deemed necessary and
appropriate under the circumstances. Our due diligence with
regards to the Proposed Transaction included, but was not
limited to, the items summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
Attended a due diligence meeting with individuals from: |
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ and Reliance management |
|
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, legal counsel to EMJ |
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB), financial advisor
to EMJ |
|
|
|
UBS, financial advisor to Reliance |
D-2
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
January 17, 2006
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
Held additional discussions with management of EMJ. |
|
|
|
Reviewed the draft Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
January 16, 2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed the Voting Agreement, dated January 13, 2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed EMJs financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 through 2005 |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
six-month periods ended September 29, 2004 and
September 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
Internal financial reports for the eight months ended
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by EMJ management the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2006 through 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed Reliances financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 through 2004 |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by Reliance management for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 through 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed other financial and operating data for EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for comparable public companies. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed valuation metrics and premiums paid in
comparable merger transactions. |
|
|
|
Reviewed other operating, financial and legal information
regarding EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed pertinent economic and industry information. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and prepared other studies, analyses and investigations
as we deemed appropriate. |
Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of
general economic, market and financial conditions, as well as
its experience in securities and business valuation, in general,
and
D-3
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
January 17, 2006
Page 4
with respect to merger and acquisition transactions, in
particular. Duff & Phelps did not make any independent
evaluation, appraisal or physical inspection of EMJs
solvency or of any specific assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise). This Opinion should not be construed as a credit
rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of EMJs credit
worthiness or otherwise as tax advice or as accounting advice.
In rendering this Opinion, Duff & Phelps relied upon
the fact that the Board of Directors and the Company have been
advised by counsel as to all legal matters with respect to the
Proposed Transaction, including whether all procedures required
by law to be taken in connection with the Proposed Transaction
have been duly, validly and timely taken; and Duff &
Phelps has not made, and assumes no responsibility to make, any
representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter.
In preparing its forecasts, performing its analysis and
rendering its Opinion with respect to the Proposed Transaction,
Duff & Phelps: (1) relied upon the accuracy,
completeness, and fair presentation of all information, data,
advice, opinions and representations obtained from public
sources or provided to it from private sources, including EMJ
and Reliance management, and did not attempt to independently
verify such information, (2) assumed that any estimates,
evaluations and projections furnished to Duff & Phelps
were reasonably prepared and based upon the last currently
available information and good faith judgment of the person
furnishing the same, and (3) assumed that the final
versions of all documents reviewed by us in draft form conform
in all material respects to the drafts reviewed. Duff &
Phelps Opinion further assumes that information supplied
and representations made by EMJ and Reliance management are
substantially accurate regarding EMJ, Reliance and the Proposed
Transaction. Neither EMJs management nor its Board of
Directors placed any limitation upon Duff & Phelps with
respect to the procedures followed or factors considered by
Duff & Phelps in rendering its Opinion.
In our analysis and in connection with the preparation of this
Opinion, Duff & Phelps has made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business, market
and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are
beyond the control of any party involved in the Proposed
Transaction. Duff & Phelps has also assumed that all of
the conditions precedent required to implement the Proposed
Transaction will be satisfied and that the Proposed Transaction
will be completed in accordance with the Merger Agreement that
was provided for our review.
The basis and methodology for this Opinion have been designed
specifically for the express purposes of the Board of Directors
of EMJ, and may not translate to any other purposes.
To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of
the facts on which this Opinion is based proves to be untrue in
any material respect, this Opinion cannot and should not be
relied upon.
Duff & Phelps has prepared this Opinion effective as of
January 17, 2006. The Opinion is necessarily based upon
market, economic, financial and other conditions as they exist
and can be evaluated as of such date, and Duff & Phelps
disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise
D-4
Board of Directors
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
January 17, 2006
Page 5
any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the
Opinion which may come or be brought to the attention of
Duff & Phelps after the date hereof.
This letter should not be construed as creating any fiduciary
duty on Duff & Phelps part to any party.
It is understood that this Opinion is for the information of the
Board of Directors in connection with its consideration of the
Proposed Transaction and may not be used for any other purpose
without Duff & Phelps prior written consent,
except as noted in the following paragraph. This Opinion is not
a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act
with respect to any matters relating to the Proposed
Transaction, or whether to proceed with the Proposed Transaction
or any related transaction, nor does it indicate that the
consideration received is the best possible attainable under any
circumstances. The decision as to whether to proceed with the
Proposed Transaction or any related transaction may depend on an
assessment of factors unrelated to the financial analysis on
which this Opinion is based. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Duff & Phelps expressly acknowledges that the members
of EMJs Board of Directors may rely upon this Opinion as
one of the factors they considered in evaluating the Proposed
Transaction.
This Opinion may be included in its entirety in any proxy
statement or other document distributed to shareholders of EMJ
in connection with the Proposed Transaction or required by law
or regulation to be filed with the SEC, and you may summarize or
otherwise reference the existence of this Opinion in such
documents provided that any such summary or reference language
shall be subject to prior approval by Duff & Phelps.
Said approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Except as
described above, without our prior consent, this Opinion may not
be quoted or referred to, in whole or in part, in any written
document.
Conclusion
Based on our analysis and relying upon the accuracy and
completeness of all information provided to us, it is our
opinion that, as of the date of this letter, the Proposed
Transaction is fair to the Companys shareholders, other
than the Excluded Persons, from a financial point of view
(without giving effect to any impacts of the Proposed
Transaction on any particular shareholder other than in its
capacity as a shareholder).
Respectfully submitted,
D-5
ANNEX E
DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
TITLE 8. CORPORATIONS
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
SUBCHAPTER IX. MERGER, CONSOLIDATION OR CONVERSION
§ 262 Appraisal rights.
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with
respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares
through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who
has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this
section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to
§ 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal
by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the
stockholders shares of stock under the circumstances
described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
As used in this section, the word stockholder means
a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a
member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words
stock and share mean and include what is
ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or
membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and
the words depository receipt mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in
one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a
corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
|
|
|
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national
securities exchange or designated as a national market system
security on an interdealer quotation system by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held of
record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no
appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of
the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did
not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the
surviving corporation as provided in subsection (f) of
§ 251 of this title. |
|
|
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this
subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a
constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by
the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except: |
|
|
|
A. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof; |
|
|
B. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as
a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
or held of record by more than 2,000 holders; |
|
|
C. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs A.
and B. of this paragraph; or |
E-1
|
|
|
D. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs A.,
B. and C. of this paragraph. |
|
|
|
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation. |
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this
section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is
practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
|
|
|
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or
(c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or
all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or |
|
|
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the |
E-2
|
|
|
transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give
either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given. |
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections
(a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within
60 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw
such stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the
terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within
120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon
written request, shall be entitled to receive from the
corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the
consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of
shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and
with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received
and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written
statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days
after such stockholders written request for such a
statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation
or within 10 days after expiration of the period for
delivery of demands for appraisal under
subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an
appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining
their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from
the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to
be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In
determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account
all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest,
the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate
of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would
have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the
proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting
corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the
appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit
discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial
upon the appraisal prior to the final
E-3
determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any
stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted
such stockholders certificates of stock to the Register in
Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all
proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder
is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in
subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the
written approval of the corporation, then the right of such
stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery
shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of
the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms
as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
E-4
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 20. INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
In Article IV of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, the Registrant has eliminated to the fullest
extent permitted under California law the liability of directors
of the Registrant for monetary damages. Additionally, the
Registrant is authorized to indemnify its agents as defined in
Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law for
breaches of their duties to the Registrant and its shareholders
through bylaw provisions or through agreements with the agents,
or both, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted
under Section 317, subject to the limits on such excess
indemnification set forth in Section 204 of the California
General Corporation Law. Section 5.11 of the
Registrants Bylaws provides that the Registrant shall
indemnify each of its agents against expenses, judgments, fines,
settlements or other amounts actually and reasonably incurred by
such person by reason of such person having been made or having
been threatened to be made a party to a proceeding to the
fullest extent permissible by the provisions of Section 317
of the California General Corporation Law, as amended from time
to time, and that the Registrant shall advance the expenses
reasonably expected to be incurred in defending any such
proceeding, upon receipt of the undertaking required by
Section 317(f).
Section 204 of the California General Corporation Law
allows a corporation, among other things, to eliminate or limit
the personal liability of a director for monetary damages in an
action brought by the corporation itself or by way of a
derivative action brought by shareholders for breach of a
directors duties to the corporation and its shareholders.
The provision may not eliminate or limit liability of directors
for the following specified actions, however: (i) for acts
or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing
and culpable violation of law; (ii) for acts or omissions
that a director believes to be contrary to the best interests of
the corporation or its shareholders, or that involve the absence
of good faith on the part of the director; (iii) for any
transaction from which a director derived an improper personal
benefit; (iv) for acts or omissions that show a reckless
disregard of the directors duty to the corporation or its
shareholders in circumstances in which the director was aware,
or should have been aware, in the ordinary course of performing
a directors duties, of a risk of serious injury to the
corporation or its shareholders; (v) for acts or omissions
that constitute an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts
to an abdication of the directors duty to the corporation
or its shareholders; (vi) for transactions between the
corporation and a director, or between corporations having
interrelated directors and (vii) for improper distributions
and stock dividends, loans and guaranties. The provision does
not apply to acts or omissions occurring before the date that
the provision became effective and does not eliminate or limit
the liability of an officer for an act or omission as an
officer, regardless of whether that officer is also a director.
Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law gives
a corporation the power to indemnify any person who was or is a
party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any proceeding,
whether threatened, pending, or completed, and whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact
that that person is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of
the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise. A corporation may indemnify such a person against
expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts
actually or reasonably incurred in connection with the
proceeding, if that person acted in good faith, and in a manner
that that person reasonably believed to be in the best interest
of the corporation; and, in the case of a criminal proceeding,
had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of the person was
unlawful. In an action by or in the right of the corporation, no
indemnification may be made with respect to any claim, issue or
matter (i) as to which the person shall have been adjudged
to be liable to the corporation in the performance of that
persons duty to the corporation and its shareholders,
unless and only to the extent that the court in which such
proceeding was brought shall determine that, in view of all of
the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses; and
(ii) which is settled or otherwise disposed of without
court approval. To the extent that any such person has been
successful on the merits in defense of any proceeding, or any
claim, issue or matter therein, that person shall be indemnified
against expenses
II-1
actually and reasonably incurred in connection therewith.
Indemnification is available only if authorized in the specific
case by a majority of a quorum of disinterested directors, by
independent legal counsel in a written opinion, by approval of
the shareholders other than the person to be indemnified, or by
the court. Expenses incurred by such a person may be advanced by
the corporation before the final disposition of the proceeding
upon receipt of an undertaking to repay the amount if it is
ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to
indemnification.
Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law
further provides that a corporation may indemnify its officers
and directors in excess of the statutory provisions if
authorized by its articles of incorporation and that a
corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any
officer, director, employee or agent against any liability
asserted or incurred in his or her capacity, or arising out of
his or her status with the corporation.
In addition to the provisions of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant, the Registrant has
entered into indemnification agreements with all of its present
and former directors and officers, to indemnify these persons
against liabilities arising from third party proceedings, or
from proceedings by or in the right of the Registrant, to the
fullest extent permitted by law. Additionally, the Registrant
has purchased directors and officers liability
insurance for the benefit of its directors and officers.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding
involving a director, officer or employee of Registrant pursuant
to which indemnification is sought, nor is Registrant aware of
any threatened litigation that may result in claims for
indemnification. Section 317 of the California General
Corporation Law and the Registrants Bylaws provide for the
indemnification of officers, directors and other corporate
agents in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons,
under certain circumstances, for liabilities (including
reimbursement of expenses incurred) arising under the Securities
Act. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of
the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
|
|
Item 21. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with
this Registration Statement or incorporated by reference herein:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 17, 2006,
among Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., RSAC Acquisition
Corp. and Earle M. Jorgensen Company (attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
2 |
.2 |
|
List of omitted schedules. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, upon request, a copy of any omitted schedule. |
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Reliance Steel &
Aluminum
Co.(1) |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Restated and Amended Bylaws of Reliance Steel &
Aluminum
Co.(1) |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 17,
2006, among Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and each of
the stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company named therein
(incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed by
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. on January 19, 2006
(included as Exhibit 2.3 therein)) |
|
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP regarding the
validity of the securities being registered in this registration
statement* |
|
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP concerning tax
matters (including consent) |
|
|
8 |
.2 |
|
Opinion of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP concerning tax matters
(including consent) |
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, among
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and each of the
stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company named therein
(attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.* |
|
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm of Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.1) |
|
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP (included in
Exhibit 8.1) |
|
|
23 |
.5 |
|
Consent of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (included in Exhibit 8.2) |
|
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page of this proxy
statement/prospectus)* |
|
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Form of Earle M. Jorgensen Company Proxy Card* |
|
|
99 |
.2 |
|
Form of Earle M. Jorgensen Company Proxy Voting Instruction Card
for Common Stock Held in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement
Savings Plan* |
|
|
99 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
|
|
99 |
.4 |
|
Consent of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLP (included in
Annex D to this proxy statement/ prospectus and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 to
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.s Registration
Statement on
Form S-1, as
amended, originally filed on May 25, 1994 as Commission
File No. 33-79318.
|
* Previously filed.
(a) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the Registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
(b) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to deliver
or cause to be delivered with the prospectus, to each person to
whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest annual report
to securityholders that is incorporated by reference in the
prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the
requirements of
Rule 14a-3 or
Rule 14c-3 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and, where interim
financial information required to be presented by Article 3
of Regulation S-X
is not set forth in the prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be
delivered to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or
given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically
incorporated by reference in the prospectus to provide such
interim financial information.
(c) (1) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes
as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the
securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus
which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or
party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other items of the applicable form.
|
|
|
(2) The Registrant undertakes that every prospectus
(i) that is filed pursuant to
paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) |
II-3
|
|
|
of the Act and is used in connection with an offering of
securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as part of an
amendment to the registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
(d) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
(e) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11, or
13 of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class
mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information
continued in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
the registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(f) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the registration statement when it became effective.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Los Angeles, State of California, on
February 27, 2006.
|
|
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. |
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Hannah |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this registration statement has been signed below by
the following persons in the capacities indicated as of
February 27, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
/s/ David H. Hannah
David H. Hannah |
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer); Director |
|
*
Gregg J. Mollins |
|
President and Chief Operating Officer; Director |
|
/s/ Karla Lewis
Karla Lewis |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer; Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
*
Joe D. Crider |
|
Chairman of the Board; Director |
|
*
Thomas W. Gimbel |
|
Director |
|
*
Douglas M. Hayes |
|
Director |
|
*
Franklin R. Johnson |
|
Director |
|
*
Mark V. Kaminski |
|
Director |
|
*
Richard J. Slater |
|
Director |
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
*
Leslie A. Waite |
|
Director |
|
*By: |
|
/s/ Karla Lewis
Karla Lewis
(Attorney-in-Fact) |
|
|
II-6