e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission
File Number: 000-51757
REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-1731691
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1700 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 2900
DALLAS, TX
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
75201
(Zip Code) |
(214) 750-1771
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The issuer
had 40,512,113 common units and 19,103,896 subordinated units outstanding as of November
7, 2007.
Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this report include forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. Statements using words such as anticipate, believe, intend,
project, plan, expect, continue, estimate, goal, forecast, may or similar
expressions help identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe our forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions and current expectations and projections about
future events, we can not give assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions
including without limitation the following:
|
§ |
|
changes in laws and regulations impacting the midstream sector of the natural gas
industry; |
|
|
§ |
|
the level of creditworthiness of our counterparties; |
|
|
§ |
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets; |
|
|
§ |
|
our use of derivative financial instruments to hedge commodity risks; |
|
|
§ |
|
the amount of collateral required to be posted from time to time in our transactions; |
|
|
§ |
|
changes in commodity prices, interest rates and demand for our services; |
|
|
§ |
|
weather and other natural phenomena; |
|
|
§ |
|
industry changes including the impact of consolidations and changes in competition; |
|
|
§ |
|
our ability to obtain required approvals for construction or modernization of our
facilities and the timing of production from such facilities; and |
|
|
§ |
|
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard
setting boards. |
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or
expected.
Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement and we
undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
2
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,304 |
|
|
$ |
9,139 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
5,782 |
|
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable, net of allowance of $55 in 2007 and $181 in 2006 |
|
|
115,764 |
|
|
|
96,993 |
|
Related party receivables |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
Assets from risk management activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
148,081 |
|
|
|
120,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas plants and buildings |
|
|
123,356 |
|
|
|
103,490 |
|
Gathering and transmission systems |
|
|
635,627 |
|
|
|
529,776 |
|
Other property, plant and equipment |
|
|
93,893 |
|
|
|
73,861 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
47,530 |
|
|
|
85,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
900,406 |
|
|
|
792,404 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(91,199 |
) |
|
|
(58,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
809,207 |
|
|
|
734,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $7,879 in 2007 and $4,676 in 2006 |
|
|
78,854 |
|
|
|
76,923 |
|
Long-term assets from risk management activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
Other, net of amortization of debt issuance costs of $1,998 in 2007 and $946 in 2006 |
|
|
12,821 |
|
|
|
17,212 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
94,149 |
|
|
|
57,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
185,824 |
|
|
|
158,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,143,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,013,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
117,450 |
|
|
$ |
117,254 |
|
Related party payables |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Escrow payable |
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
Accrued taxes payable |
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
Liabilities from risk management activities |
|
|
19,872 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
9,069 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
159,655 |
|
|
|
135,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities from risk management activities |
|
|
7,369 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
15,687 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
455,500 |
|
|
|
664,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
(42,096,786 and 21,969,480 units authorized; 40,494,334 and 19,620,396 units
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006) |
|
|
504,512 |
|
|
|
42,192 |
|
Class B common units (5,173,189 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31,
2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,671 |
|
Class C common units (2,857,143 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31,
2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,992 |
|
Subordinated units (19,103,896 units authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006) |
|
|
13,264 |
|
|
|
43,240 |
|
General partner interest |
|
|
11,721 |
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(24,596 |
) |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
504,901 |
|
|
|
212,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
$ |
1,143,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,013,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unaudited
(in thousands except unit data and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales |
|
$ |
175,107 |
|
|
$ |
135,532 |
|
|
$ |
538,360 |
|
|
$ |
425,282 |
|
NGL sales |
|
|
90,605 |
|
|
|
72,997 |
|
|
|
237,382 |
|
|
|
194,176 |
|
Gathering, transportation and other fees, including
related party amounts of $541 and $1,325 in 2007 and
$540 and $1,656 in 2006 |
|
|
20,254 |
|
|
|
17,125 |
|
|
|
58,017 |
|
|
|
44,559 |
|
Net realized and unrealized loss from risk management
activities |
|
|
(8,088 |
) |
|
|
(3,090 |
) |
|
|
(10,798 |
) |
|
|
(7,172 |
) |
Other |
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
20,443 |
|
|
|
18,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
285,441 |
|
|
|
229,132 |
|
|
|
843,404 |
|
|
|
675,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of gas and liquids, including related party amounts
of $656 and $13,829 in 2007 and $499 and $1,765 in 2006 |
|
|
234,946 |
|
|
|
186,345 |
|
|
|
696,644 |
|
|
|
561,108 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
34,409 |
|
|
|
28,394 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management services termination fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
267,006 |
|
|
|
217,145 |
|
|
|
803,052 |
|
|
|
649,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
18,435 |
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
40,352 |
|
|
|
25,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(10,894 |
) |
|
|
(10,929 |
) |
|
|
(41,740 |
) |
|
|
(27,319 |
) |
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
(21,200 |
) |
|
|
(12,447 |
) |
|
|
(21,200 |
) |
|
|
(12,447 |
) |
Other income and deductions, net |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(12,956 |
) |
|
|
(11,272 |
) |
|
|
(21,603 |
) |
|
|
(13,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income from January 1-31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for partners |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest |
|
|
(12,540 |
) |
|
|
(11,047 |
) |
|
|
(21,235 |
) |
|
|
(15,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to common and subordinated units |
|
$ |
(12,540 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,606 |
) |
Weighted average common and subordinated units outstanding |
|
|
55,269,457 |
|
|
|
38,207,792 |
|
|
|
48,306,666 |
|
|
|
38,207,792 |
|
Loss per common and subordinated unit |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
Distributions declared per unit |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.9417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to Class B common units |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,481 |
) |
Weighted average Class B common units
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,173,189 |
|
|
|
871,673 |
|
|
|
5,173,189 |
|
Loss per Class B common unit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
Distributions declared per unit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to Class C common units |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average Class C common units
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,575 |
|
|
|
408,163 |
|
|
|
107,591 |
|
Loss per Class C common unit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Distributions declared per unit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unaudited
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
Hedging losses
reclassified to
earnings |
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
5,086 |
|
Net change in fair
value of cash flow
hedges |
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
16,828 |
|
|
|
(33,072 |
) |
|
|
10,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
$ |
(19,849 |
) |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
$ |
(47,283 |
) |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
5
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Unaudited
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,979 |
|
|
|
27,967 |
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs |
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
Equity
income from unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
Risk management portfolio valuation changes |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unit based compensation expenses |
|
|
14,790 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
Cash flow changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable |
|
|
(16,287 |
) |
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities |
|
|
18,853 |
|
|
|
(3,299 |
) |
Accrued taxes payable |
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
3,919 |
|
Proceeds from early termination of interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
49,879 |
|
|
|
33,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(104,202 |
) |
|
|
(107,136 |
) |
Acquisition
of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation, net of equity issued |
|
|
(34,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Como assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,807 |
) |
Acquisition of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary, net of cash of $100 in 2006 |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
194 |
|
Restricted cash used in asset option disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
11,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(132,323 |
) |
|
|
(188,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facilities |
|
|
33,300 |
|
|
|
(39,400 |
) |
Borrowings under credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
684,650 |
|
Repayments under credit facilities |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
(463,000 |
) |
Repayment of senior notes |
|
|
(192,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
General partner contributions |
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
3,786 |
|
Partner distributions |
|
|
(56,208 |
) |
|
|
(22,528 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
(10,488 |
) |
Proceeds from equity issuances, net of issuance costs |
|
|
353,446 |
|
|
|
312,700 |
|
Cash distribution to HM Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,757 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of over allotment option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,163 |
|
Over allotment option proceeds to HM Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,163 |
) |
Acquisition of TexStar, net of repayment of promissory note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,592 |
) |
Repayment of promissory note to HMTF Gas Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
94,609 |
|
|
|
158,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12,165 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
9,139 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
21,304 |
|
|
$ |
6,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid and early redemption penalty, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
51,324 |
|
|
$ |
21,057 |
|
Non-cash capital expenditures in accounts payable |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
13,252 |
|
Non-cash capital expenditures for consolidation of investment in previously
unconsolidated subsidiary |
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash capital expenditure upon entering into a capital lease obligation |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common units for acquisition |
|
|
19,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
6
Regency Energy Partners LP
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners Capital
Unaudited
(in thousands except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class C |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class C |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance December
31, 2006 |
|
|
19,620,396 |
|
|
|
5,173,189 |
|
|
|
2,857,143 |
|
|
|
19,103,896 |
|
|
$ |
42,192 |
|
|
$ |
60,671 |
|
|
$ |
59,992 |
|
|
$ |
43,240 |
|
|
$ |
5,543 |
|
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
|
$ |
212,657 |
|
Conversion of
Class B and C to
common units |
|
|
8,030,332 |
|
|
|
(5,173,189 |
) |
|
|
(2,857,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,663 |
|
|
|
(60,671 |
) |
|
|
(59,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
units for
acquisition |
|
|
751,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,724 |
|
Issuance of common
units |
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,446 |
|
Issuance of
restricted common
units |
|
|
592,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of
restricted common
units |
|
|
(38,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common
unit options |
|
|
37,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit based
compensation
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,790 |
|
General Partner
contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,735 |
|
Partner
distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,587 |
) |
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,208 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,405 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,668 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Net hedging
activity
reclassified to
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
7,457 |
|
Net change in fair
value
of cash flow
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,072 |
) |
|
|
(33,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September
30, 2007 |
|
|
40,494,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,103,896 |
|
|
$ |
504,512 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,264 |
|
|
$ |
11,721 |
|
|
$ |
(24,596 |
) |
|
$ |
504,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
7
Regency Energy Partners LP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Basis of Presentation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements presented herein contain the results of Regency Energy Partners LP, a Delaware limited
partnership (Partnership), and its predecessor, Regency Gas Services LLC (Predecessor). The
Partnership was formed on September 8, 2005. On February 3, 2006, in conjunction with its initial
public offering of securities (IPO), the Predecessor was converted to a limited partnership,
Regency Gas Services LP (RGS), and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. The
Partnership and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of gathering, treating, processing,
transporting, and marketing natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs). References to Regency
Energy Partners, the Partnership, we, our, us and similar terms, refer to Regency Energy
Partners LP and its subsidiaries. References to our general partner or the General Partner
refer to Regency GP LP, the general partner of the Partnership. References to the Managing General
Partner refer to Regency GP LLC, the general partner of the General Partner, which effectively
manages the business and affairs of the Partnership.
On June 18, 2007, Regency GP Acquirer LP, an indirect subsidiary of General Electric Capital
Corporation, acquired 91.3 percent of both the member interest in the Managing General Partner and
the outstanding limited partner interests in the General Partner from an affiliate of HM Capital
Partners LLC (HM Capital). Concurrently, Regency LP Acquirer LP, another indirect subsidiary of
General Electric Capital Corporation, acquired 17,763,809 of the outstanding subordinated units, of
which 1,222,717 subordinated units were owned directly or indirectly by certain members of the
Partnerships management team.
GE Energy Financial Services is a unit of General Electric Capital Corporation which is an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company. For simplicity, we refer to
Regency GP Acquirer LP, Regency LP Acquirer LP and GE Energy Financial Services collectively as GE
EFS. The Partnership has not recorded any adjustments to reflect GE EFSs acquisition of the HM
Capitals interest in the Partnership or the related transactions (together, referred to as GE EFS
Acquisition).
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership and its wholly owned
subsidiaries. The Partnership operates and manages its business as two reportable segments: a)
gathering and processing, and b) transportation.
The unaudited financial information as of September 30, 2007, and for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 has been prepared on the same basis as the audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006. In the opinion of the Partnerships management, such financial
information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position
and the results of operations for such interim periods in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). All intercompany items and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have
been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Partnership reclassified interest payable at December 31, 2006 to conform to the current year
presentation.
Use of Estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with GAAP and, of necessity, include the use of estimates and assumptions by
management. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Intangible Assets. The total gross carrying amount of intangible assets that were subject to
amortization was $86,733,000 at September 30, 2007 and $81,599,000 at December 31, 2006. Aggregate
amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1,243,000 and
$3,230,000, respectively.
8
Income Taxes. The Partnership is generally not subject to income taxes, except as disclosed
below, because its income is taxed directly to its partners. Effective January 1, 2007, the
Partnership became subject to the gross margin tax enacted by the state of Texas on May 1, 2006.
The Partnership has wholly-owned subsidiaries that are subject to income tax and provides for
income taxes using the liability method for these entities. Accordingly, deferred taxes are
recorded for differences between the tax and book basis that will reverse in future periods. The
Partnerships deferred tax liability of $8,722,000 as of September 30, 2007 relates to depreciation
of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets and is included in other long-term
liabilities.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards. In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FIN No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB
Statement 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Partnerships
consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.
157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which provides guidance for using fair value to
measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever another standard requires (or
permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This standard does not expand the use
of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential effects on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the adoption of this standard.
In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at
fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential effects
on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the adoption of this standard
that are not currently required to be measured at fair value.
9
2. Loss per Limited Partner Unit
The following table shows the amounts used in computing basic and diluted limited partner loss
per unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands except unit data and per unit data) |
|
Net loss for partners |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,395 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners allocation of prior year losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(12,540 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,047 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
allocated to common and subordinated units |
|
$ |
(12,541 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,606 |
) |
Weighted average common and subordinated units
basic and diluted |
|
|
55,269,457 |
|
|
|
38,207,792 |
|
|
|
48,306,666 |
|
|
|
38,207,792 |
|
Loss per common and subordinated unit |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
allocated to Class B common units |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,481 |
) |
Weighted average Class B common units outstanding * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,173,189 |
|
|
|
871,673 |
|
|
|
5,173,189 |
|
Loss per
Class B common unit basic and diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
allocated to Class C common units |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average Class C common units outstanding * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,575 |
|
|
|
408,163 |
|
|
|
107,591 |
|
Loss per
Class C common unit basic and diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from
diluted loss per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted common units |
|
|
386,500 |
|
|
|
506,500 |
|
|
|
386,500 |
|
|
|
506,500 |
|
Common unit options |
|
|
776,968 |
|
|
|
909,300 |
|
|
|
776,968 |
|
|
|
909,300 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Converted into common units during the three months ended March 31, 2007. |
Loss per unit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 reflects only the eight months
since the closing of the Partnerships IPO on February 3, 2006. For convenience, January 31, 2006
has been used as the date of the change in ownership. Accordingly, results for January 2006 have
been excluded from the calculation of loss per unit. While the non-vested (or restricted) units
are deemed to be outstanding for legal purposes, they have been excluded from the calculation of
basic loss per unit in accordance with SFAS No. 128.
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, the Partnership allocates net income or loss to each class of
equity security in proportion to the amount of distributions earned during that period. Since the
Class B common units were deemed to be outstanding in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006, a portion of net loss was allocated to this class of equity because they were not expressly
prohibited from receiving distributions. The Partnership Agreement requires that the general
partner shall receive a 100 percent allocation of income until its capital account is made whole
for all of the net losses allocated to it in prior tax years.
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Palafox Joint Venture. The Partnership acquired the outstanding interest in the Palafox Joint
Venture not owned by it (50 percent) for $5,000,000 effective February 1, 2007. The Partnership
allocated $10,057,000 to gathering and transmission systems in the three months ended March 31,
2007. The allocated amount consists of the investment in unconsolidated subsidiary of $5,650,000
immediately prior to the Partnerships acquisition and the Partnerships $5,000,000 purchase of the
remaining interest offset by $593,000 of working capital accounts acquired.
Asset Dispositions. The Partnerships primary asset dispositions for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 are discussed below. The Partnership sold selected non-core pipelines, related
rights of way and contracts located in south Texas for $5,340,000 on March 31, 2007 and recorded a
one-time loss on sale of $1,808,000. Additionally, the
Partnership sold two small gathering systems and associated contracts located in the
Midcontinent region for $1,750,000 on May 31, 2007 and recorded a loss on the sale of $532,000.
The Partnership also sold its 34 mile NGL pipeline located in east Texas for $3,000,000 on June 29,
2007 and simultaneously entered into transportation and operating
10
agreements with the buyer. The Partnership accounted for this transaction as a sale-leaseback
whereby the $3,000,000 gain was deferred and will be amortized to earnings over a twenty year
period. The Partnership recorded $3,000,000 in gathering and transmission systems and the related
obligations under capital lease. On August 31, 2007, the Partnership sold an idle processing plant
for $1,300,000 and recorded a $740,000 gain.
Acquisition of Pueblo Midstream Gas Corporation. On April 2, 2007, the Partnership and its
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Pueblo Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Pueblo
Holdings), entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement)
with Bear Cub Investments, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the members of that company
(the Members) and Robert J. Clark, as Sellers Representative, pursuant to which the Partnership
and Pueblo Holdings on that date acquired all the outstanding equity of Pueblo Midstream Gas
Corporation, a Texas corporation (Pueblo), from the Members (the Pueblo Acquisition). Pueblo
owns and operates natural gas gathering, treating and processing assets located in south Texas.
These assets are comprised of a 75 MMcf/d gas processing and treating facility, 33 miles of
gathering pipelines and approximately 6,000 horsepower of compression.
The purchase price for the Pueblo Acquisition consisted of (1) the issuance of 751,597 common
units of the Partnership to the Members, valued at $19,724,000 and (2) the payment of $34,844,000
in cash, exclusive of outstanding Pueblo liabilities of $9,822,000 and certain working capital
amounts acquired of $383,000. The cash portion of the consideration was financed out of the
proceeds of the Partnerships revolving credit facility.
The Pueblo Acquisition offers the opportunity to reroute gas to one of the Partnerships
existing gas processing plants which is expected to provide cost savings. The total purchase price
was allocated preliminarily as follows based on estimates of the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At April 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
384 |
|
Gas plants and buildings |
|
|
8,994 |
|
Gathering and transmission systems |
|
|
13,078 |
|
Other property, plant and equipment |
|
|
180 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization (contracts) |
|
|
5,242 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
36,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
64,475 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(330 |
) |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(9,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
54,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
The final purchase price allocation, which management expects to complete by December 31,
2007, may differ from the above estimates.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared as if the
acquisition of Pueblo had occurred at the beginning of 2006. Such unaudited pro forma information
does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the
transactions to which the Partnership is giving pro forma effect actually occurred on the date
referred to above or the results of operations that may be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Results for the |
|
Pro Forma Results for the |
|
Pro Forma Results for the |
|
|
period from July 1, 2006 |
|
period from January 1, 2006 |
|
period from January 1, 2007 |
|
|
through September 30, 2006 |
|
through September 30, 2006 |
|
through September 30, 2007 |
|
|
(in thousands except earnings (loss) per unit data) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
232,985 |
|
|
$ |
686,615 |
|
|
$ |
847,125 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(11,258 |
) |
|
|
(15,352 |
) |
|
|
(21,359 |
) |
Loss per
common and subordinated unit basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
Loss per
Class B common unit basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss per
Class C common unit basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
In connection with the Pueblo Acquisition, the Partnership entered into a Registration Rights
Agreement with the Members. In July 2007, the SEC declared effective the registration statement
associated with the units issued in the Pueblo Acquisition.
4. Equity Offering
On July 26, 2007, the Partnership sold 10,000,000 common units for $32.05 per unit. After
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12,820,000, the Partnership received
$307,680,000 from this sale, excluding the general partners proportionate capital contribution of
$6,279,000 and offering expenses to date of $386,000. On July 31, 2007, the Partnership sold an
additional 1,500,000 for $32.05 as the underwriters exercised their option to purchase additional
units. The Partnership received $46,152,000 from this sale after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and excluding the general partners proportionate capital contribution of $942,000.
The Partnership used a portion of these proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the term
($50,000,000) and revolving credit facility ($178,930,000). With the remaining proceeds and
additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility, the Partnership repurchased
$192,500,000, or 35 percent, of its outstanding senior notes which required the Partnership to pay
an early redemption penalty of $16,122,000 in August 2007.
5. Risk Management Activities
The Partnerships hedging positions reduce exposure to variability of future commodity prices
through 2009. The net fair value of the Partnerships risk management activities constituted a
liability of $27,241,000 as of September 30, 2007. The Partnership expects to reclassify
$15,643,000 of hedging losses as an offset to revenues from accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) in the next twelve months. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the
Partnership recorded $2,952,000 and $2,604,000 of mark-to-market losses, respectively, inclusive of
$515,000 of ineffectiveness for certain hedges in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Partnership recognized immaterial gains
related to hedged forecasted transactions that did not occur by the end of the originally specified
period.
Upon the early termination of an interest rate swap with a notional debt amount of
$200,000,000 that was effective from April 2007 through March 2009, the Partnership received
$3,550,000 in cash from the counterparty. In the three months ended September 30, 2007, the
remaining $777,000 unamortized proceeds were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) as a reduction to interest expense, net because the hedged forecasted transaction
will not occur. The Partnership reclassified $1,078,000 from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), reducing interest expense, net in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
6. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt obligations of the Partnership are as follows:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
357,500 |
|
|
$ |
550,000 |
|
Term loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Revolving loans |
|
|
98,000 |
|
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
455,500 |
|
|
|
664,700 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
455,500 |
|
|
$ |
664,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability under term and revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit facility limit |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
Term loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
Revolver loans |
|
|
(98,000 |
) |
|
|
(64,700 |
) |
Letters of credit |
|
|
(26,088 |
) |
|
|
(5,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available |
|
$ |
375,912 |
|
|
$ |
180,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding balances of term debt and revolver debt under the credit facility bear
interest at LIBOR plus a margin or Alternative Base Rate (equivalent to the US prime lending rate)
plus a margin, or a combination of both. The weighted average interest rates for the senior notes
and for the revolving and term loan facilities, including interest rate swap settlements,
commitment fees, and amortization of debt issuance costs were 8.74 percent and 7.73 percent for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 8.78 percent and 8.57 percent for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The outstanding balances of the
senior notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.375 percent and their estimated fair value was
approximately $376,269,000 at September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, the Partnership was in
compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and the senior notes.
In July 2007, the Partnership used a portion of the proceeds from the equity offering to repay
the $50,000,000 outstanding principal balance of term loan against the credit facility, together
with accrued interest. Unamortized loan origination costs of $503,000 were written off and charged
to loss on debt refinancing in the three months ended September 30, 2007.
In August 2007, the Partnership exercised its option to redeem 35 percent or $192,500,000 of
its outstanding senior notes on or before December 15, 2009. Under the senior notes terms, no
further redemptions are permitted until December 15, 2010. The Partnership made the redemption at
a price of 108.375 percent of the principal amount plus accrued interest. Accordingly, a
redemption premium of $16,122,000 was recorded as loss on debt
refinancing during the three months
ended September 30, 2007. Unamortized loan origination costs of $4,575,000 were written off and
charged to loss on debt refinancing in the three months ended September 30, 2007. A portion of the
proceeds of an equity offering was used to redeem the senior notes.
In September 2007, the Partnership exchanged its then outstanding 8 3/8 percent senior notes
which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 for senior notes with identical terms
that have been so registered.
On September 28, 2007, the Partnerships wholly owned subsidiary, RGS, entered into an
amendment (the Amendment) to its Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August
15, 2006. The Amendment (a) increases the amount of revolving commitments from $250,000,000 to
$500,000,000 and (b) allows the Partnership to request an additional $250,000,000 in revolving
commitments with 10 business days written notice.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal. The Partnership is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business. In the
opinion of management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate will not have a material adverse
effect on the Partnerships business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
13
Escrow Payable. At September 30, 2007, $5,975,000 remained in escrow pending the completion
by El Paso Field Services, LP (El Paso) of environmental remediation projects pursuant to the
purchase and sale agreement (El Paso PSA) related to the assets in north Louisiana and in the
mid-continent area. In the El Paso PSA, El Paso indemnified the predecessor of our operating
partnership RGS against losses arising from pre-closing and known environmental liabilities subject
to a limit of $84,000,000 and subject to certain deductible limits. Upon completion of a Phase II
environmental study, Regency LLC Predecessor notified El Paso of remediation obligations amounting
to $1,800,000 with respect to known environmental matters and $3,600,000 with respect to
pre-closing environmental liabilities. Upon satisfactory completion of the remediation by El Paso,
the amount held in escrow will be released.
Environmental. A Phase I environmental study was performed on the Waha assets in connection
with the pre-acquisition due diligence process in 2004. Most of the identified environmental
contamination had either been remediated or was being remediated by the previous owners or
operators of the properties. The aggregate potential environmental remediation costs at specific
locations were estimated to range from $1,900,000 to $3,100,000. No governmental agency has
required the Partnership to undertake these remediation efforts. Management believes that the
likelihood that it will be liable for any significant potential remediation liabilities identified
in the study is remote. Separately, the Partnership acquired an environmental pollution liability
insurance policy in connection with the acquisition to cover any undetected or unknown pollution
discovered in the future. The policy covers clean-up costs and damages to third parties, and has a
10-year term (expiring 2014) with a $10,000,000 limit subject to certain deductibles. No claims
have been made.
8. Related Party Transactions
HM Capital continues to hold over ten percent of the Partnerships outstanding units, and
accordingly, HM Capital and its affiliates are considered to be a
related party. Blackbrush Oil & Gas LLC (BBOG), an
affiliate of HM Capital, is a natural gas producer on the Partnerships gas gathering and
processing system. At the time of the Partnerships acquisition of TexStar, BBOG entered into an
agreement providing for the long term dedication of the production from its leases to the
Partnership. In July 2007, BBOG sold its interest in the largest of these leases to an unrelated
third party. Accordingly, activity related to this lease is now reflected as third party revenues
and cost of gas and liquids on the Partnerships statement of operations. BlackBrush Energy, Inc.,
a wholly owned subsidiary of HM Capital, subleases office space to the Partnership for which it
paid $40,000 and $120,000 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. All of the
Partnerships related party receivables, payables, revenues and expenses as disclosed in the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements relate to BBOG.
The employees operating the assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries and all those
providing staff or support services are employees of the Managing General Partner and other affiliates of the Partnership. Pursuant to
the Partnership Agreement, these affiliates receive a monthly reimbursement for all direct and
indirect expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership. Reimbursements of $7,169,000 and
$3,556,000 were recorded in the Partnerships financial statements during three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and reimbursements of $20,408,000 and $9,870,000 were
recorded in the Partnerships financial statements during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 as operating expenses or general and administrative expenses, as appropriate.
In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership on common and subordinated units,
together with the general
14
partner interest, HM Capital and affiliates received cash distributions
of $21,215,000 and $12,206,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 as a result
of their ownership in the Partnership. Concurrently with the closing of the Partnerships IPO in
three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership paid $9,000,000 to an affiliate of
HM Capital to terminate a management services contract with a remaining term of nine years.
In the three months ending September 30, 2006, the Partnership paid $3,542,000 to HM Capital to
terminate management services contracts associated with the TexStar acquisition.
In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership on common and subordinated units,
together with the general partner interest, GE EFS and affiliates received cash distributions of
$7,212,000 during the three months ended September 30, as a result of their ownership in the
Partnership.
9. Segment Information
The Partnership has two reportable segments: i) gathering and processing and ii)
transportation. Gathering and processing involves the collection of hydrocarbons from producer
wells across the five operating regions and transportation of them to a plant where water and other
impurities such as hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide are removed. Treated gas is then processed
to remove the natural gas liquids. The treated and processed natural gas is then transported to
market separately from the natural gas liquids. The Partnership aggregates the results of its
gathering and processing activities across five geographic regions into a single reporting segment.
The transportation segment uses pipelines to transport natural gas from receipt points on its
system to interconnections with larger pipelines or trading hubs and other markets. The
Partnership performs transportation services for shipping customers under firm or interruptible
arrangements. In either case, revenues are primarily fee based and involve minimal direct exposure
to commodity price fluctuations. The Partnership also purchases natural gas at the inlets to the
pipeline and sells this gas at its outlets. The north Louisiana intrastate pipeline operated by
this segment serves the Partnerships gathering and processing facilities in the same area and
those transactions create the intersegment revenues shown in the table below.
Management evaluates the performance of each segment and makes capital allocation decisions
through the separate consideration of segment margin and operation and maintenance expenses.
Segment margin is defined as total revenues, including service fees, less cost of gas and liquids.
Management believes segment margin is an important measure because it is directly related to
volumes and commodity price changes. Operation and maintenance expenses are a separate measure
used by management to evaluate operating performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance,
property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most
significant portion of operation and maintenance expenses. These expenses are largely independent
of the volume throughput but fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific
period. The Partnership does not deduct operation and maintenance expenses from total revenues in
calculating segment margin because management separately evaluates commodity volume and price
changes in segment margin.
Results for each statement of operations period, together with amounts related to balance
sheets for each segment, are shown below.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing |
|
Transportation |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
External Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
189,334 |
|
|
$ |
96,107 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
285,441 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
171,548 |
|
|
|
57,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,132 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
579,119 |
|
|
|
264,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843,404 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
483,176 |
|
|
|
191,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,056 |
|
Intersegment Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,782 |
) |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of Gas and Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
154,127 |
|
|
|
80,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,946 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
140,854 |
|
|
|
45,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,345 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
475,329 |
|
|
|
221,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,644 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
401,925 |
|
|
|
159,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561,108 |
|
Segment Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
35,207 |
|
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,495 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
30,694 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,787 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
103,790 |
|
|
|
42,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,760 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
81,251 |
|
|
|
32,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,948 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
11,031 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,477 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
9,477 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
29,663 |
|
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,409 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
25,054 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,394 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
9,767 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,542 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
26,498 |
|
|
|
10,054 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
18,910 |
|
|
|
8,773 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
775,201 |
|
|
|
319,610 |
|
|
|
48,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143,112 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
648,116 |
|
|
|
316,038 |
|
|
|
48,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,013,085 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
59,905 |
|
|
|
34,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,149 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
23,308 |
|
|
|
34,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,552 |
|
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
135,075 |
|
|
|
8,269 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,046 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
158,685 |
|
|
|
28,513 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,701 |
|
16
The table below provides a reconciliation of total segment margin to net loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
34,409 |
|
|
|
28,394 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management services termination fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
10,929 |
|
|
|
41,740 |
|
|
|
27,319 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
21,200 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
|
|
21,200 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
Other income and deductions, net |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin |
|
$ |
50,495 |
|
|
$ |
42,787 |
|
|
$ |
146,760 |
|
|
$ |
113,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Equity-Based Compensation
In December 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Partnerships
managing general partner approved a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) for the Partnerships
employees, directors and consultants covering an aggregate of 2,865,584 common units. All
outstanding, unvested LTIP awards at the time of the GE EFS Acquisition vested upon the change of
control of the managing general partner. As a result, the Partnership recorded a one-time charge
of $11,928,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007. LTIP awards subsequent to the GE EFS
Acquisition vest on the basis of one-fourth of the award each year. The Partnership expects to
recognize $10,448,000 of compensation expense related to the grants under LTIP ratably over the
future vesting period.
The restricted (non-vested) common unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Restricted (Non-Vested) Common Units |
|
Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
516,500 |
|
|
$ |
21.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
592,500 |
|
|
|
30.47 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(684,167 |
) |
|
|
22.91 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(38,333 |
) |
|
|
25.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
386,500 |
|
|
|
31.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Subsequent Events
Partner Distributions. On October 26, 2007, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.39
per common and subordinated unit, payable on November 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the
close of business on November 7, 2007.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations. You
should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in
conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included
elsewhere in this document.
OVERVIEW
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed to capitalize on opportunities in the midstream
sector of the natural gas industry. We own and operate significant natural gas gathering and
processing assets in north Louisiana, east Texas, south Texas, west Texas and the mid-continent
region of the United States, which includes Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and the Texas Panhandle.
We are engaged in gathering, processing, marketing and transporting natural gas and natural gas
liquids, or NGLs. We connect natural gas wells of producers to our gathering systems through which
we transport the natural gas to processing plants operated by us or by third parties. The
processing plants separate NGLs from the natural gas. We then sell and deliver the natural gas and
NGLs to a variety of markets. References to Regency Energy Partners, the Partnership, we,
our, us and similar terms, refer to Regency Energy Partners LP and its subsidiaries.
References to our general partner or the General Partner refer to Regency GP LP, the general
partner of the Partnership. References to the Managing General Partner refer to Regency GP LLC,
the general partner of the General Partner, which effectively manages the business and affairs of
the Partnership.
In February 2006, we consummated the initial public offering of our common units. In August
2006, we acquired all the outstanding equity of TexStar Field Services, L.P. and its general
partner, TexStar GP, LLC (the TexStar Acquisition), from HMTF Gas Partners II, L.P. (HMTF Gas
Partners), an affiliate of HM Capital Partners LLC (HM Capital). Hicks Muse Equity Fund V, L.P.
(Fund V) and its affiliates, through HM Capital, controlled our general partner at the time.
Fund V controls HMTF Gas Partners through HM Capital. Because our acquisition of TexStar was a
transaction between commonly controlled entities, we accounted for the transaction in a manner
similar to a pooling of interests, and we updated our historical financial statements to include
the financial condition and results of operations of TexStar for periods during which common
control existed (December 1, 2004 forward).
On June 18, 2007, Regency GP Acquirer LP, an indirect subsidiary of General Electric Capital
Corporation, acquired 91.3 percent of both the member interest in our Managing General Partner and
the outstanding limited partner interests in our General Partner from an affiliate of HM Capital.
Concurrently, Regency LP Acquirer LP, another indirect subsidiary of General Electric Capital
Corporation, acquired 17,763,809 of our outstanding subordinated units, of which 1,222,717
subordinated units were owned directly or indirectly by certain members of the Partnerships
management team.
GE Energy Financial Services is a unit of General Electric Capital Corporation which is an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company. For simplicity, we refer to
Regency GP Acquirer LP, Regency LP Acquirer LP and GE Energy Financial Services collectively as GE
EFS. The Partnership has not recorded any adjustments to reflect GE EFSs acquisition of the HM
Capitals interest in the Partnership (referred to as GE EFS Acquisition).
HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS
Our management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze our
performance. We view these measures as important tools for evaluating the success of our
operations and review these measurements on a monthly basis for consistency and trend analysis.
These measures include volumes, segment margin and operating and maintenance expenses on a segment
basis and EBITDA on a company-wide basis.
Volumes. We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase
throughput volumes on our gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain existing
supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is affected by (1) the level of workovers or
recompletions of existing connected wells and successful drilling activity in areas currently
dedicated to our pipelines, (2) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells in
other areas and (3) our ability to obtain natural gas that has been released from other
commitments. We routinely monitor producer activity in the areas served by our gathering and
processing systems to pursue new supply opportunities.
18
To increase throughput volumes on our intrastate pipeline we must contract with shippers,
including producers and marketers, for supplies of natural gas. We routinely monitor producer and
marketing activities in the areas served by our transportation system in search of new supply
opportunities.
Segment Margin. We calculate our Gathering and Processing segment margin as our revenue
generated from our gathering and processing operations minus the cost of natural gas and NGLs
purchased and other cost of sales, including third-party transportation and processing fees.
Revenue includes revenue from the sale of natural gas and NGLs resulting from these activities and
fixed fees associated with the gathering and processing of natural gas.
We calculate our Transportation segment margin as revenue generated by fee income as well as,
in those instances in which we purchase and sell gas for our account, gas sales revenue minus the
cost of natural gas that we purchase and transport. Revenue primarily includes fees for the
transportation of pipeline-quality natural gas and the margin generated by sales of natural gas
transported for our account. Most of our segment margin is fee-based with little or no commodity
price risk. We generally purchase pipeline-quality natural gas at a pipeline inlet price adjusted
to reflect our transportation fee and we sell that gas at the pipeline outlet. We regard the
difference between the purchase price and the sale price as the economic equivalent of our
transportation fee.
Total Segment Margin. Segment margin from Gathering and Processing, together with segment
margin from Transportation, comprise total segment margin. We use total segment margin as a
measure of performance. The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure, total
segment margin, to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, net loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
34,409 |
|
|
|
28,394 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management services termination fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
10,929 |
|
|
|
41,740 |
|
|
|
27,319 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
21,200 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
|
|
21,200 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
Other income and deductions, net |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin |
|
$ |
50,495 |
|
|
$ |
42,787 |
|
|
$ |
146,760 |
|
|
$ |
113,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and Maintenance. Operation and maintenance expense is a separate measure that we
use to evaluate operating performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance, property
taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant
portion of our operating and maintenance expense. These expenses are largely independent of the
volumes through our systems but fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific
period. We do not deduct operation and maintenance from total revenues in calculating segment
margin because we separately evaluate commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.
EBITDA. We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, provision for income taxes and
depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental measure by our management
and by external users of our financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and others, to assess:
|
§ |
|
financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital
structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
§
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support
our indebtedness and make cash distributions to our unitholders and general partner; |
|
|
§
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to those of other
companies in the midstream
energy sector, without regard to financing or capital structure; and |
|
|
§
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates
of return on alternative investment opportunities. |
19
EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance
with GAAP. EBITDA is the starting point in determining cash available for distribution, which is
an important non-GAAP financial measure for a publicly traded master limited partnership. The
following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure, EBITDA, to its most directly comparable
GAAP measure, net loss and net cash flows provided by operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
49,879 |
|
|
$ |
33,002 |
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(38,979 |
) |
|
|
(27,967 |
) |
Write-off of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5,078 |
) |
|
|
(12,447 |
) |
Equity income |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
Risk management portfolio valuation changes |
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
|
|
1,517 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(1,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unit based compensation expenses |
|
|
(14,790 |
) |
|
|
(1,952 |
) |
Changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued revenues and accounts receivable |
|
|
16,287 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(18,853 |
) |
|
|
3,299 |
|
Accrued taxes payable |
|
|
(3,388 |
) |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
Interest payable |
|
|
(6,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
(3,919 |
) |
Proceeds from early termination of interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,550 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
(2,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
41,740 |
|
|
|
27,319 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
57,612 |
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
On May 15, 2007, the Partnership paid a distribution of $0.38 per common and subordinated unit
for the three months ended March 31, 2007. On August 14, 2007, the Partnership paid a distribution
of $0.38 per common and subordinated unit for the three months ended June 30, 2007. On October 26,
2007, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.39 per common and subordinated unit, payable to
unit holders of record at the close of business on November 7, 2007. The distribution is payable
on November 14, 2007, and constitutes an increase of 2.6 percent over the prior quarters
distribution, and 11.4 percent over the minimum quarterly distribution.
20
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
The following table contains key company-wide performance indicators related to our discussion
of the results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(in thousands except percentages and volume data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
285,441 |
|
|
$ |
229,132 |
|
|
$ |
56,309 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Cost of gas and liquids |
|
|
234,946 |
|
|
|
186,345 |
|
|
|
48,601 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin (1) |
|
|
50,495 |
|
|
|
42,787 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
n/m |
|
Management services termination fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
(3,542 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
18,435 |
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
6,448 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(10,894 |
) |
|
|
(10,929 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
(21,200 |
) |
|
|
(12,447 |
) |
|
|
(8,753 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
Other income and deductions, net |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(12,956 |
) |
|
|
(11,272 |
) |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System inlet volumes (MMbtu/d) (2) |
|
|
1,247,356 |
|
|
|
1,093,889 |
|
|
|
153,467 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For reconciliation of total segment margin to its most directly comparable financial measure
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read Item 2. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations How We Evaluate Our Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
System inlet volumes include total volumes taken into both our gathering and processing and
transportation systems. |
|
n/m not meaningful. |
21
The table below contains key segment performance indicators related to our discussion of the
results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Change |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands except volume data) |
|
|
|
|
Segment Financial and Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering and Processing Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin |
|
$ |
35,207 |
|
|
$ |
30,694 |
|
|
$ |
4,513 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
11,031 |
|
|
|
9,477 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (MMbtu/d) |
|
|
751,911 |
|
|
|
590,192 |
|
|
|
161,719 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
NGL gross production (Bbls/d) |
|
|
22,655 |
|
|
|
20,376 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin |
|
$ |
15,288 |
|
|
$ |
12,093 |
|
|
$ |
3,195 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (MMbtu/d) |
|
|
788,789 |
|
|
|
656,494 |
|
|
|
132,295 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net Loss. Net loss increased $1,524,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the three months ended September 30, 2006. The following factors contributed to the change in
net loss:
|
§ |
|
an increase in total segment margin of $7,708,000 was primarily due to organic growth
in the gathering and processing segment; |
|
|
§ |
|
the absence in 2007 of management services termination fees of $3,542,000 associated
with our TexStar Acquisition; |
|
|
§ |
|
a gain of $777,000 in 2007 associated with the sale of certain non-core assets; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in loss on debt refinancing of $8,753,000 primarily due to a
$16,122,000 early termination penalty in 2007 associated with the repurchase of 35
percent of our senior notes partially offset by a $7,369,000 decrease in the write-off
of debt issuance costs related to discharging or refinancing credit facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization of $3,783,000 primarily due to higher
levels of depreciation from our Pueblo Acquisition and projects completed since
September 30, 2006; and |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in operation and maintenance expense of $1,910,000 primarily due to
organic growth in the gathering and processing segment. |
Segment Margin. Total segment margin for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased
$7,708,000 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was attributable
to an increase of $4,513,000 in gathering and processing segment margin and an increase of
$3,195,000 in transportation segment margin as discussed below.
Gathering and processing segment margin increased to $35,207,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 from $30,694,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The major
components of this increase were as follows:
|
§ |
|
$3,313,000 associated with various organic growth projects in east and south Texas; |
|
|
§ |
|
$2,918,000 attributable to the operation of LaSalle County organic growth projects
in south Texas; |
|
|
§ |
|
$1,651,000 attributable to the operations of our Dubberly refrigeration plant in North Louisiana;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
$460,000 primarily attributable to increased throughput volumes in north Louisiana;
partially offset by |
22
|
§ |
|
$3,757,000 associated with non-cash losses due to changes in the value of derivative
contracts on mark-to-market accounting. |
Transportation segment margin increased to $15,288,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2007 from $12,093,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The major components of
this increase were as follows:
|
§ |
|
$2,347,000 associated with increased throughput volumes; |
|
|
§ |
|
$426,000 associated with increased margins per unit volume; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$421,000 attributable to increased margins associated with the marketing activities. |
Operation and Maintenance. Operations and maintenance expense increased to $12,477,000 in the
three months ended September 30, 2007 from $10,567,000 for the corresponding period in 2006, an 18
percent increase. This increase is primarily the result of the following factors:
|
§ |
|
$676,000 of increased employee related expenses primarily in the gathering and
processing segment resulting from additional employees related to organic growth and
employee annual pay raises; |
|
|
§ |
|
$535,000 of increased property taxes associated with organic growth in our
gathering and processing segment and transportation system in north Louisiana; |
|
|
§ |
|
$279,000 of increased materials and parts expense primarily in the gathering and
processing segment used at our processing plants and for additional compression; |
|
|
§ |
|
$247,000 increase in contractor expenses primarily in the gathering and processing
segment mostly related to contractor expense at our Fashing Processing Plant; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$226,000 increase in utilities expense primarily in the gathering and processing
segment from one of our north Louisiana refrigeration plants that was placed in
service in December 2006. |
Other. In the three months ended September 30, 2007, we sold certain non-core assets and
recorded a gain of $777,000. In the three months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded a one-time
charge of $3,542,000 for the termination of a management services contracts in connection with our
TexStar Acquisition.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $13,542,000
in the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $9,759,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2006, a 39 percent increase. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense of $3,008,000
primarily from projects completed since September 30, 2006 and depreciation expense from our Pueblo
Acquisition in April 2007. Also contributing to the increase was higher identifiable intangible
asset amortization of $775,000 primarily related to contracts acquired in April 2007 and July 2006.
Amortization associated with the contracts acquired in July 2006 was recorded in the fourth quarter
of 2006 upon completion of purchase price allocation related to the Como acquisition.
Loss on Debt Refinancing. In the three months ended September 30, 2007, we paid a $16,122,000
early termination penalty associated with the repurchase of 35 percent of our senior notes. We also
expensed $5,078,000 of debt issuance costs related to the discharge of the term loan facility and
the redemption of senior notes. In the three months ended September 30, 2006, we wrote-off
$7,312,000 of debt issuance costs to amend and restate our credit facility and $5,135,000 of debt
issuance costs associated with paying off TexStars loan agreement as part of our TexStar
Acquisition.
23
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
The following table contains key company-wide performance indicators related to our discussion
of the results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(in thousands except percentages and volume data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
843,404 |
|
|
$ |
675,056 |
|
|
$ |
168,348 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Cost of gas and liquids |
|
|
696,644 |
|
|
|
561,108 |
|
|
|
135,536 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin (1) |
|
|
146,760 |
|
|
|
113,948 |
|
|
|
32,812 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
34,409 |
|
|
|
28,394 |
|
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
|
|
13,691 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Management services termination fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542 |
|
|
|
(12,542 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
40,352 |
|
|
|
25,435 |
|
|
|
14,917 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(41,740 |
) |
|
|
(27,319 |
) |
|
|
(14,421 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
(21,200 |
) |
|
|
(12,447 |
) |
|
|
(8,753 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
Other income and deductions, net |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(21,603 |
) |
|
|
(13,831 |
) |
|
|
(7,772 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,837 |
) |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System inlet volumes (MMbtu/d) (2) |
|
|
1,200,423 |
|
|
|
976,093 |
|
|
|
224,330 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For reconciliation of total segment margin to its most directly comparable financial
measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read Item 2. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations How We Evaluate Our
Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
System inlet volumes include total volumes taken into both our gathering and processing and
transportation systems. |
|
n/m not meaningful. |
24
The table below contains key segment performance indicators related to our discussion of the
results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Change |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands except volume data) |
|
|
|
|
Segment Financial and Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering and Processing Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin |
|
$ |
103,790 |
|
|
$ |
81,251 |
|
|
$ |
22,539 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
29,663 |
|
|
|
25,054 |
|
|
|
4,609 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (MMbtu/d) |
|
|
745,823 |
|
|
|
503,952 |
|
|
|
241,871 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
NGL gross production (Bbls/d) |
|
|
21,233 |
|
|
|
18,286 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin |
|
$ |
42,970 |
|
|
$ |
32,697 |
|
|
$ |
10,273 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (MMbtu/d) |
|
|
757,367 |
|
|
|
558,168 |
|
|
|
199,199 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Net Loss. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $7,837,000 compared
with the nine months ended September 30, 2006. An increase in total segment margin of $32,812,000,
primarily due to organic growth in the gathering and processing segment, and the absence in 2007 of
management services termination fees of $12,542,000 from our IPO and TexStar Acquisition were more
than offset by:
|
§ |
|
an increase in interest expense, net of $14,421,000 primarily due to increased
levels of borrowings used primarily to finance our Pueblo Acquisition and growth
capital projects; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in general and administrative expense of $13,691,000 primarily due to a
one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated with
the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on June
18, 2007 with the change in control from HM Capital to GE EFS and higher employee
related expenses; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization of $9,169,000 primarily due to higher
levels of depreciation from projects completed since September 30, 2006 and our Pueblo
Acquisition; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in loss on debt refinancing of $8,753,000 primarily due to a
$16,122,000 early termination penalty in 2007 associated with the redemption of 35
percent of our senior notes partially offset by a $7,369,000 decrease in the write-off
of capitalized debt issuance costs related to paying off or refinancing credit
facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in operation and maintenance expense of $6,015,000 primarily due to
increased employee related expenses, increased consumables expense, higher property
taxes associated with organic growth, increased materials and parts and
utilities expense, and an unplanned outage in the transportation segment which
represents our estimated thirty day deductible; and |
|
|
§ |
|
a loss on the sale of certain non-core assets of $1,562,000 in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. |
Segment Margin. Total segment margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased
$32,812,000 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was attributable
to an increase of $22,539,000 in gathering and processing segment margin and an increase of
$10,273,000 in transportation segment margin as discussed below.
25
Gathering and processing segment margin increased to $103,790,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
from $81,251,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The major components of this increase were as follows:
|
§ |
|
$9,246,000 primarily attributable to various organic growth projects in east and
south Texas; |
|
|
§ |
|
$8,043,000 attributable to the operation of the Elm Grove and Dubberly refrigeration
plants in North Louisiana, which began operations in May 2006 and December 2006,
respectively; |
|
|
§ |
|
$6,619,000 attributable to the operation of LaSalle County organic growth projects in
South Texas, which began operations in December 2006; |
|
|
§ |
|
$5,537,000 primarily attributable to increased throughput volumes in north Louisiana;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
$3,356,000 attributable to improved results in the mid-continent area; partially
offset by |
|
|
§ |
|
$5,089,000 associated with operational issues in west Texas; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$4,995,000 associated with non-cash losses due to changes in the value of derivative
contracts on mark-to-market accounting. |
Transportation segment margin increased to $42,970,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $32,697,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The major components of this
increase were as follows:
|
§ |
|
$10,936,000 attributable to an increase in throughput volumes, partially offset by
reduced margin per unit of $1,545,000; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$881,000 of increased margins from marketing activities. |
Operation and Maintenance. Operations and maintenance expense increased to $34,409,000 in the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $28,394,000 for the corresponding period in 2006, a 21
percent increase. This increase is primarily the result of the following factors:
|
§ |
|
$2,040,000 of increased employee related expenses primarily in the gathering and
processing segment resulting from additional employees related to organic growth and
employee annual pay raises; |
|
|
§ |
|
$1,002,000 of increased consumable expenses primarily in the gathering and processing
segment primarily resulting from additional compression; |
|
|
§ |
|
$1,001,000 of increased higher property taxes associated with organic growth in our
gathering and processing and transportation segments; |
|
|
§ |
|
$697,000 of increased materials and parts expense primarily in the gathering and
processing segment used at our processing plants and for additional compression; |
|
|
§ |
|
$645,000 of increased utility expense primarily in the gathering and processing
segment resulting from one of our north Louisiana refrigeration plants placed in service
in December 2006; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$633,000 of unplanned outage expense in the transportation segment in 2007 related to
the eastside compressor fire, which represents our estimated thirty day deductible. |
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased to $32,962,000 in the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $19,271,000 for the same period in 2006, a 71 percent
increase. The increase is primarily due to:
|
§ |
|
a one-time charge of $11,928,000 related to our long-term incentive plan associated
with the vesting of all outstanding common unit options and restricted common units on
June 18, 2007 with the change in control from HM Capital to GE EFS; |
|
|
§ |
|
$1,811,000 of increased employee related expenses resulting from pay raises and the
hiring of new employees to assist us in achieving our strategic objectives; |
|
|
§ |
|
$910,000 of increased expenses associated with our long-term incentive plan that
primarily relates to the issuance of restricted units, exclusive of the one-time charge
discussed above; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Partially offsetting these increases was the absence in 2007 of acquisition expenses
related to our TexStar Acquisition of $1,721,000. |
Other. In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded charges of $12,542,000 for
the termination of long-term management services contracts in connection with our IPO and TexStar
Acquisition. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we sold certain non-core assets and
recorded a related charge of $1,562,000.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $37,475,000
in the nine months
26
ended September 30, 2007 from $28,306,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a 32
percent increase. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense of $7,342,000 primarily from
projects completed since September 30, 2006 and our Pueblo Acquisition. Also contributing to the
increase was higher identifiable intangible asset amortization of $1,827,000 primarily related to
contracts associated with the Pueblo Acquisition and the TexStar Acquisition in April 2007 and July
2006, respectively. Amortization associated with the contracts acquired in July 2006 was recorded
in the fourth quarter of 2006 upon completion of purchase price allocation related to the Como
acquisition.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net increased $14,421,000, or 53 percent, in the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Of this increase,
$11,837,000 was primarily attributable to increased levels of borrowings and $3,732,000 was
attributable to higher interest rates partially offset by the reclassification of $1,196,000 from
accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the gain upon the termination of an interest
rate swap.
Loss on Debt Refinancing. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we paid a $16,122,000
early repayment penalty associated with the redemption of 35 percent of our senior notes. We also
expensed $5,078,000 of debt issuance costs related to the pay off of the term loan facility and the
early termination of senior notes. In the three months ended September 30, 2006, we wrote-off
$7,312,000 of debt issuance costs to amend and restate our credit facility and we wrote-off
$5,135,000 of debt issuance costs associated with paying off TexStars loan agreement as part of
our TexStar Acquisition.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Information regarding the Partnerships critical accounting policies and estimates is included
in Item 7 of the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
OTHER MATTERS
Legal. The Partnership is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business. In the
opinion of management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate will not have a material adverse
effect on the Partnerships business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Escrow Payable. At September 30, 2007, $5,975,000 remained in escrow pending the completion
by El Paso Field Services, LP (El Paso) of environmental remediation projects pursuant to the
purchase and sale agreement (El Paso PSA) related to the assets in north Louisiana and in the
mid-continent area. In the El Paso PSA, El Paso indemnified the predecessor of our operating
partnership RGS against losses arising from pre-closing and known environmental liabilities subject
to a limit of $84,000,000 and subject to certain deductible limits. Upon completion of a Phase II
environmental study, Regency LLC Predecessor notified El Paso of remediation obligations amounting
to $1,800,000 with respect to known environmental matters and $3,600,000 with respect to
pre-closing environmental liabilities. RGS is negotiating a settlement with El Paso and, upon
reaching agreement, the amount held in escrow will be released.
Environmental. A Phase I environmental study was performed on the Waha assets in connection
with the pre-acquisition due diligence process in 2004. Most of the identified environmental
contamination had either been remediated or was being remediated by the previous owners or
operators of the properties. The potential environmental
27
remediation costs at specific locations were estimated to range from $1,900,000 to $3,100,000.
No governmental agency has required the Partnership to undertake these remediation efforts.
Management believes that the likelihood that it will be liable for any significant potential
remediation liabilities identified in the study is remote. Separately, the Partnership acquired an
environmental pollution liability insurance policy in connection with the acquisition to cover any
undetected or unknown pollution discovered in the future. The policy covers clean-up costs and
damages to third parties, and has a 10-year term (expiring 2014) with a $10,000,000 limit subject
to certain deductibles.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We expect our sources of liquidity to include:
|
§ |
|
cash generated from operations; |
|
|
§ |
|
borrowings under our credit facility; |
|
|
§ |
|
debt offerings; and |
|
|
§ |
|
issuance of additional partnership units. |
We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our minimum
quarterly cash distributions and our requirements for short-term working capital and growth capital
expenditures for the next twelve months. We believe our relationship with GE EFS increases our
access to capital and enables us to pursue strategic opportunities that we might otherwise not be
able to pursue. In addition, we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our credit facility to
fund our near term growth capital requirements.
Equity Offering. On July 26, 2007, the Partnership sold 10,000,000 common units for $32.05
per unit. After deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12,820,000, the Partnership
received $307,680,000 from this sale, excluding the general partners proportionate capital
contribution of $6,279,000 and offering expenses to date of $386,000. On July 31, 2007, the
Partnership sold an additional 1,500,000 common units for $32.05 per unit upon exercise by the
underwriters of their option to purchase additional units. The Partnership received $46,152,000
from this sale after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and excluding the general
partners proportionate capital contribution of $942,000.
The Partnership used a portion of these proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the term
($50,000,000) and revolving credit facility ($178,930,000). With the remaining proceeds and
additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility, the Partnership redeemed $192,500,000,
or 35 percent of its outstanding senior notes, an event which required the Partnership to pay an
early redemption penalty of $16,122,000 in August 2007.
As a result of the improvement in our leverage ratios, the interest rate on borrowings under
the revolving credit facility will be LIBOR plus 1.50 percent, a reduction of .75 percentage
points. Moreover, during the three months ended September 30, 2007, the two credit rating agencies
raised the credit ratings of the Partnership to BB- and Ba3.
On September 28, 2007, the Partnerships wholly owned subsidiary, RGS, entered into an
amendment (the Amendment) to its Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August
15, 2006. The Amendment (a) increases the amount of revolving commitments from $250,000,000 to
$500,000,000 and (b) allows us to request an additional $250,000,000 in revolving commitments with
10 business days written notice,
Proposed Acquisition. We are in advanced negotiations regarding the acquisition of
FrontStreet Hugoton LLC from an affiliate of GE EFS for approximately $150,000,000, substantially all of which
would be funded by an issuance of our limited partner units to the affiliate. We expect the
acquisition to be immediately accretive to cash available for
distribution. FrontStreet Hugoton LLC owns a gas gathering system in Kansas and Oklahoma, also known as the
Hugoton gas gathering system. The system consists of five compressor stations and 1,700
miles of pipeline extending over nine counties.
Working Capital Surplus (Deficit). Working capital is the amount by which current assets
exceed current liabilities and is a measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become
due. During periods of growth capital expenditures, we experience working capital deficits when we
fund construction expenditures out of working capital until they are permanently financed. Our
working capital is also influenced by current risk management assets and liabilities due to
28
fair market value changes in our derivative positions being reflected on our balance sheet.
These represent our expectations for the settlement of risk management rights and obligations over
the next twelve months, and so must be viewed differently from trade accounts receivable and
accounts payable which settle over a much shorter span of time. When our derivative positions are
settled, we expect an offsetting physical transaction, and, as a result, we do not expect risk
management assets and liabilities to affect our ability to pay bills as they come due.
Our working capital deficit was $11,574,000 at September 30, 2007 compared to a working
capital deficit of $15,240,000 at December 31, 2006. The increase in working capital of $3,666,000
is primarily due to:
|
§ |
|
an increase in accrued revenues and accounts receivable of
$18,771,000 due to the timing
of cash receipts; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $12,165,000 due to certain producer
payments made after September 30, 2007; partially offset by |
|
|
§ |
|
a net increase of $18,351,000 in liabilities from risk management activities
primarily due to an increase in the commodity prices we expect to pay (index prices) on
our outstanding swaps as compared to the commodity prices we will receive upon
settlement; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in interest payable of $6,071,000 due primarily to interest accruals on
our senior notes; and |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in accrued taxes payable of $3,388,000 primarily due to anticipated
increased levels of property tax in the gathering and processing and transportation
segments. |
Cash Flows from Operations. Net cash flows provided by operating activities increased
$16,877,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Cash generated from operations increased primarily due to increased segment
margin of $32,812,000 offset by an increase in accrued revenues and accounts receivable of
$18,771,000 due the timing of cash receipts.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash flows used in investing activities decreased
$56,152,000, or 30 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the cost ($81,807,000) of our 2006
acquisition of our Como assets, proceeds from the sale of certain non-core assets in 2007 of
$11,723,000, a decrease in spending on growth and maintenance capital expenditures of $2,934,000
discussed in Capital Requirements, offset by the cost ($34,844,000) of our Pueblo Acquisition in
April 2007.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities
decreased $64,162,000, or 40 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to the following:
|
§ |
|
a decrease in borrowings under our credit facility of $684,650,000 due to
restructuring our capitalization; |
|
|
§ |
|
an increase in partner distributions of $33,680,000 due to increased distributions
per unit, no partner distributions paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and a
partial partner distribution paid in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 resulting from the
timing of our IPO; |
|
|
§ |
|
the issuance of 11,500,000 common units for $353,446,000, net of issuance costs, in
2007 used to repay 35 percent or $192,500,000 of our senior notes, to repay our
$50,000,000 term loan, and to pay down our revolving credit facility; and |
|
|
§ |
|
the issuance of 13,750,000 common units in our Initial Public Offering in 2006 and
2,857,143 Class C common units for $312,700,000, net of issuance costs,
in 2006. |
Capital Requirements
We categorize our capital expenditures as either:
|
§ |
|
Growth capital expenditures, which are made to acquire additional assets to increase
our business, to expand and upgrade existing systems and facilities or to construct or
acquire similar systems or facilities; or |
|
|
§ |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace partially or fully
depreciated assets, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to
extend their useful lives or to maintain existing system volumes and related cash flows. |
29
Growth Capital Expenditures. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we incurred
$68,062,000 of growth capital expenditures. Growth capital expenditures primarily relate to growth
capital projects listed below and our acquisition of the outstanding interest in the Palafox Joint Venture that we did not own (50
percent) for $5,000,000 in February 2007.
In 2007, the board has approved $85,000,000 of growth capital. More than 30 projects comprise
these growth capital expenditures, the most significant of which are:
|
§ |
|
$16,700,000 for constructing a 40 mile, 10 inch diameter pipeline, expected to be
completed in 2008; |
|
|
§ |
|
$14,800,000 for constructing 20 miles of 10 inch diameter pipeline, which will
connect the Fashing Processing Plant to our Tilden Processing Plant in south Texas and
reconfiguring our Tilden Processing Plant, expected to be completed in the first half of
2008; |
|
|
§ |
|
$9,900,000 to re-build and activate an existing nitrogen rejection unit at our
Eustace Processing Plant, completed in the second quarter of 2007; |
|
|
§ |
|
$7,400,000 for constructing 31 miles of 12 inch diameter pipeline in south Texas,
completed in the second quarter of 2007; and |
|
|
§ |
|
$7,000,000 for the electrification and adding an acid gas injection well at our
Tilden Processing Plant, completed in the second quarter of 2007. |
Maintenance Capital Expenditures. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we incurred
$5,003,000 of maintenance capital expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist
of compressor and equipment overhauls, as well as new well connects to our gathering systems, which
replace volumes from naturally occurring depletion of wells already connected.
Contractual Obligations. The following table summarizes our total contractual cash
obligations as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008-2009 |
|
|
2010-2011 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including interest) (1) |
|
$ |
683,460 |
|
|
$ |
17,122 |
|
|
$ |
77,092 |
|
|
$ |
171,865 |
|
|
$ |
417,381 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (2) |
|
$ |
684,547 |
|
|
$ |
17,292 |
|
|
$ |
77,851 |
|
|
$ |
172,023 |
|
|
$ |
417,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes a constant current LIBOR interest rate of 5.23 percent plus the applicable margin on
our revolver. Our senior notes of $357,500,000 bear a fixed interest rate
of 8 3/8 percent. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes physical and financial purchases of natural gas, NGLs, and other energy commodities
due to the nature of both the price and volume components of such purchases, which vary on a daily or
monthly basis. Additionally, we do not have contractual commitments for fixed price and/or fixed
quantities of any material amount. |
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a net seller of NGLs, and as such our financial results are exposed to fluctuations in
NGLs pricing. We have executed swap contracts settled against crude oil, ethane, propane, butane,
and natural gasoline market prices. We have hedged our expected exposure to declines in prices for
NGLs, condensate and natural gas volumes produced for our account in the approximate percentages
set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
NGL |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Condensate |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
We continually monitor our hedging and contract portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our
hedge position as conditions warrant.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our NGL swaps outstanding at
September 30, 2007. The relevant index price that we pay is the monthly average of the daily
closing price for deliveries of commodities into Mont Belvieu, Texas as reported by the Oil Price
Information Service (OPIS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/(Liability) |
|
Period |
|
Commodity |
|
Notional Volume |
|
|
Pay |
|
We Receive |
|
(in thousands) |
|
October 2007 December 2008 |
|
Ethane |
|
928 (MBbls) |
|
Index |
|
$0.55-$0.673($/gallon) |
|
$ |
(6,640 |
) |
October 2007 December 2009 |
|
Propane |
|
936 (MBbls) |
|
Index |
|
$0.825-$1.10($/gallon) |
|
|
(7,929 |
) |
October 2007 December 2009 |
|
Normal Butane |
|
604 (MBbls) |
|
Index |
|
$1.025-$1.27($/gallon) |
|
|
(6,015 |
) |
October 2007 December 2009 |
|
Natural Gasoline |
|
346 (MBbls) |
|
Index |
|
$ 1.22-$1.59($/gallon) |
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
October 2007 December 2009 |
|
West Texas Intermediate Crude |
|
535 (MBbls) |
|
Index |
|
$ 65.60-$68.38($/Bbl) |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(27,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
As of September 30, 2007, we had $98,000,000 of outstanding long-term balances exposed to
variable interest rate risk. An increase of 100 basis points in the LIBOR rate would increase our
annual interest payment by $980,000.
31
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls. At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was
performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our managing general partner, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in
Rule 13a15(e) and 15d15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our managing general partner, concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2007 to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is properly recorded, processed summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Internal control over financial reporting. In anticipation of becoming subject to the
provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we initiated in early 2005 a program
of documentation, implementation and testing of internal control over financial reporting. This
program will continue through this year, culminating with our initial Section 404 certification and
attestation in early 2008.
To the extent that we discover any matter in the design or operation of our system of internal
control over financial reporting that might be considered to be a significant deficiency or a
material weakness, whether or not considered reasonably likely to affect adversely our ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information properly, we report that matter to our
independent registered public accounting firm and to the audit committee of our board of directors.
During the quarter, we implemented an Information Technology (I.T.) program change process
including internal controls providing I.T. with an orderly method in which changes to the I.T.
environment are requested, authorized, developed, tested and approved prior to installation or
implementation in the production environment. Highlights of this process (vs. prior operating
procedures) include:
|
§ |
|
With the exception of designated Partnership I.T. personnel, all other internal
Partnership users and external vendors are locked out of the production environment; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Management review/approval must be evidenced at key points in the process from
authorization of change requests through testing of changes (made outside the production
environment) and migration to the production environment by designated Partnership I.T.
personnel. |
Other than discussed above, there have been no changes in the Partnerships internal controls over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Partnerships internal
controls over financial reporting.
32
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information required for this item is provided in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies,
included in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included under
Part I, Item 1, which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and in Park II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, which could materially affect
our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our
Partnership.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The information required for this item is provided in Note 3, Acquisitions and Dispositions,
included in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included under
Part I, Item 1, which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits below are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit 12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Financial Officer
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP
By: Regency GP LP, its general partner
By: Regency GP LLC, its general partner
/s/ Lawrence B. Connors
Lawrence B. Connors
Vice President of Accounting and Finance (Duly
Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
November 13, 2007
34