e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended July
31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-14959
BRADY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
39-0178960
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
6555 West Good Hope Road,
Milwaukee, WI 53223
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(414) 358-6600
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered
|
Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock, Par Value
$.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the non-voting common stock held
by non-affiliates of the registrant as of January 31, 2007,
was approximately $1,762,270,644 (based on closing sale price of
$37.45 per share on that date as reported for the New York Stock
Exchange). As of September 24, 2007, there were outstanding
50,830,420 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock
(the Class A Common Stock), and
3,538,628 shares of Class B Common Stock. The
Class B Common Stock, all of which is held by affiliates of
the registrant, is the only voting stock.
Brady Corporation and Subsidiaries are referred to herein as the
Company, Brady, or we.
|
|
(a)
|
General
Development of Business
|
The Company, a Wisconsin corporation founded in 1914, currently
operates 61 manufacturing or distribution facilities in
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, France,
Germany, India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia,
Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Slovakia, Sweden,
Thailand, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Company
also sells through subsidiaries or sales offices in these
countries, with additional sales through a dedicated team of
international sales representatives in Hong Kong, the
Philippines, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
The Company further markets its products to parts of Eastern
Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Russia. The Companys
corporate headquarters are located at 6555 West Good Hope
Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223, and the telephone number is
(414) 358-6600.
The Companys Internet address is
http://www.bradycorp.com.
|
|
(b)
|
Financial
Information About Industry Segments
|
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 7
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
|
|
(c)
|
Narrative
Description of Business
|
Brady Corporation is an international manufacturer and marketer
of identification solutions and specialty products which
identify and protect premises, products and people. Bradys
core capabilities in manufacturing, channel management, printing
systems, precision engineering and materials expertise make it a
leading supplier to the Maintenance, Repair and Operations
(MRO) market and to the Original Equipment
Manufacturing (OEM) market. The Companys
ability to provide customers with a broad range of
differentiated solutions both through the organic development of
its existing business and the acquisition of complementary and
adjacent businesses, its commitment to quality and service, its
global footprint and its diversified sales channels have made it
a world leader in its markets.
Brady manufactures and markets a wide range of products for use
in diverse applications. Major product lines provided to the MRO
market include facility identification, safety and complementary
products, wire and cable identification products, sorbent
materials, people identification products and regulatory
publishing. Major product lines provided to the OEM market
include high-performance identification products for product
identification, wire identification, work in process
identification, bar code labels and precision die-cut components
for mobile telecommunications devices, hard disk drives, medical
devices and supplies, automotive electronics and other
electronics. Products are marketed through multiple channels,
including through distributors, business-to-business direct
marketing and a direct sales force.
The need for the Companys products is driven, in part, by
customer specifications, by regulatory compliance requirements
imposed by agencies such as the Occupational Safety &
Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States and
other regulatory agencies around the world, and by the need to
identify and track assets or to identify, direct, warn, inform,
train and protect people or products. Brady serves customers in
general manufacturing, maintenance and safety, process
industries, construction, electrical, telecommunications,
electronics, laboratory/healthcare, airline/transportation,
security/brand education, governmental, public utility, and a
variety of other industries. The Company has a broad customer
base, with the largest customer representing approximately 5% of
net sales.
I-1
Bradys vision is to be either first or second in terms of
market share in every market served. The Companys primary
growth objectives are to build upon its leading market
positions, to improve performance and profitability and to
expand existing activities through a multi-prong approach that
incorporates organic growth, new product development and
acquisitions.
The Company believes the following competitive strengths will
allow it to achieve its strategy:
Leader in Niche Markets. Brady competes in
niche markets where it believes it is often the leading supplier
with the manufacturing expertise, infrastructure, channels and
sales resources necessary to provide the required product or
comprehensive solution. For example, the Company believes it is
the leading supplier of wire identification products to the
North American MRO market and of precision die-cut components to
the mobile telecommunications market. The Company believes its
leadership positions make it a preferred supplier to many of its
customers and enables it to be successful in its markets, which
are generally fragmented and populated with smaller or regional
competitors.
Differentiated Solutions and Commitment to
Innovation. The Company believes its
sophisticated engineering and manufacturing capabilities, as
well as its expertise in materials, give it a competitive
advantage in supplying customized or high specification product
solutions to meet individualized customer needs. The Company has
been successful in identifying and incorporating innovative
technologies to create integrated and precise solutions.
Additionally, it is able to use its materials expertise and its
investment in research and development to provide unique
products to meet the demands of end-customers in new, faster
growing markets adjacent to its traditional markets, such as
laboratory identification. Bradys commitment to product
innovation is reflected in its research and development efforts
that include approximately 250 employees primarily
dedicated to research and development activities mainly in the
United States, but also in Belgium, Germany, Singapore, Sweden
and South Korea.
Operational Excellence. Brady has achieved
continuous improvement in operational productivity. It employs
well-developed problem solving techniques and invests in
state-of-the-art equipment to capture efficiencies. The Company
is largely vertically integrated and designs, manufactures and
markets a majority of the products it sells. The Company has
invested heavily over the last several years to centralize its
North American distribution network and to standardize its
Systems, Applications, and Products for data processing
(SAP) software applications. It has consistently
generated positive cash flow from operations by continually
reducing costs and optimizing inventory management and the
efficiency of its manufacturing operations.
Broad Customer Base and Geographic
Diversity. Brady believes its global
infrastructure and diverse market presence mitigates the impact
of an economic downturn on its business in any particular
country or region, enables it to act as a primary supplier to
many of its global customers and provides a solid platform for
further expansion. Sales from international operations increased
from 44.4% of net sales in fiscal 2000 to 60.9% of net sales in
fiscal 2007. The Companys global presence benefits many of
its customers who seek a single or primary supplier to meet
their global design and manufacturing requirements. Brady has
over 500,000 end-customers that operate in multiple industries.
Disciplined Acquisition and Integration
Strategy. The Company has a dedicated team of
experienced professionals that employ a disciplined acquisition
strategy and process to acquire companies. It applies strict
financial standards to evaluate all acquisitions using an
expected return model based on a modified return on invested
capital calculation. It also conducts disciplined integration
reviews of acquired firms to track progress toward results
expected at the time of acquisition. Since 1996, the Company has
acquired and integrated 51 companies to primarily increase
market share in existing and new geographies. It has acquired
companies that expand the product range it offers both existing
and new customers, as well as adding new technological
capabilities.
Channel Diversity and Strength. Brady utilizes
a wide range of channels to reach customers across a broad array
of industries. It employs direct marketing expertise to meet its
customers need for convenience. The Company also has
long-standing relationships with, and is a preferred supplier
to, many of its largest distributors. In addition, the Company
employs a global sales team to support both distributors and end
users and to serve their productivity, tracking and safety
requirements. The Company believes its strong brands and
reputation for quality,
I-2
innovation and on-time delivery contribute to the popularity of
its products with distributors, OEMs, resellers and other
customers.
Deep and Talented Team. The Company believes
that its team of employees has substantial depth in critical
operational areas and has demonstrated success in reducing
costs, integrating acquisitions and improving processes through
economic cycles. The international experience of its management
team and its commitment to developing strong management teams in
each of the local operations is a competitive advantage. In
addition, the Company believes it employs a world-class team of
people and dedicates significant resources to recruiting people
committed to excellence and investing in their potential. The
depth and breadth of knowledge within the entire Brady
organization strengthens relationships with its customers and
suppliers and enables the Company to provide its customers with
a high level of product and industry expertise.
The Companys primary growth objectives are to build upon
its leading market positions, to improve its performance and
profitability and to expand its existing activities through a
multi-prong strategic approach that incorporates both organic
growth and acquisitions. The Companys key strategies
include:
Capitalize on Growing Niche Markets. The
Company seeks to leverage its premier reputation, global
footprint and strength in manufacturing and materials expertise
to capitalize on growth in existing niche markets. Growth
prospects in the MRO market are driven primarily by the general
health of regional economies, changes in legal and regulatory
compliance requirements and the increased need of customers to
identify their assets and protect their employees. Demand for
OEM products is primarily driven by the strength of various
electronics markets, such as mobile telecommunications, portable
electronic devices, disk drives and computers, as well as
technological advances in these markets and other industrial
OEMs.
Increase Market Share. Many Brady markets are
fragmented and populated with smaller or regional competitors.
The Company seeks to leverage its investment in new product
development and its global sales, operations and distribution
capabilities to increase market share, as well as expand its
distribution channels to capture new customers. The Company
employs a dedicated and experienced sales team that works
closely with existing customers to identify and capture new
opportunities. In addition, Brady plans to leverage the strength
of its brands, the quality of its products and its long-standing
relationships with key customers to build upon current market
positions.
Enter New Markets. The Company looks to
leverage its quality products, global infrastructure, channel
relationships and selling capabilities to effectively enter new
markets, many of which are fragmented and populated with smaller
competitors. For example, Brady is expanding its precision
die-cut capabilities into the medical market and is leveraging
its common distribution networks into the sorbent materials
market. Through product innovation and development activities,
Brady seeks to introduce new technologies and differentiated
products as well as seek additional applications for products in
existing and new markets. The Company reviews its product and
market portfolio on a regular basis through its standardized
review process in order to identify new product opportunities.
Expand Geographically. Bradys long-term
strategy involves the pursuit of growth opportunities in a
number of markets outside of the United States. The Company is
committed to being in close proximity to its customers and to
low-cost manufacturing. Brady currently operates in 28 countries
and employs approximately 3,900 people, approximately 45%
of its total workforce, in developing regions. Brady has made
strategic acquisitions and has invested heavily in its global
infrastructure and flexible manufacturing capacity in order to
follow its customers into new geographies. Bradys regional
management structure is a key component in effectively entering
and competing in new geographies.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. The Company
intends to continue to make complementary strategic acquisitions
to further its goal of strengthening its market positions and
entering new markets and geographies. Brady works to drive
substantial value creation through capitalizing on its
acquisition and integration acumen.
Improve Profitability. The Company plans to
continue its focus on improving operating efficiency, reducing
costs, and improving productivity and return on assets. In
addition, each acquisition the Company makes provides
I-3
additional opportunities to improve its performance as well as
the performance of the acquired company. The Company often
continues to realize synergies with acquired companies several
years after the acquisition date.
The Company is largely vertically integrated by designing,
developing, coating and producing most of its identification
signs, labels and printing systems. Brady materials are
developed internally and manufactured out of a variety of films,
predominantly coated by Brady, for applications in the following
markets: electronic, industrial, electrical, utility,
laboratory, safety and security. Brady also manufactures
specialty tapes and related products that are characterized by
high-performance printable top coats and adhesives, most of
which are formulated by the Company, to meet high-tolerance
requirements of the industries in which they are used.
The Companys stock and custom products consist of over
500,000 stock-keeping units, including complete identification
systems and other products used to create a safer work
environment, improve operating efficiencies, and increase the
utilization of assets through tracking and inventory process
controls. Major product categories include: facility and safety
signs and identification tags and markers, pipe and valve
markers, asset identification tags, lockout/tagout products,
security and traffic control products, and printing systems and
software for creating safety and regulatory labels and signs,
spill control and clean up products, wire and cable markers,
high-performance labels, laboratory identification labels and
printing systems, stand-alone printing systems, bar-code and
other software, automatic identification and data collection
systems, personal identification products, and precision die-cut
solutions.
Some of the Companys stock products were originally
designed, developed and manufactured as custom products for a
specific customer. However, such products have frequently
created wide industry acceptance and have become stock items
offered by the Company through mail order and distributor sales.
The Companys most significant types of products are
described below.
MRO
Market Products
Facility
Identification
Informational signs and printers for use in a broad range
of industrial, commercial, governmental and institutional
applications. These signs are either self-adhesive or
mechanically mounted, designed for both indoor and outdoor use
and are manufactured to meet standards issued by the National
Safety Council, OSHA and a variety of industry associations in
the United States and abroad. The Companys sign products
include admittance, directional and exit signs; electrical
hazard warnings; energy conservation messages; fire protection
and fire equipment signs; hazardous waste labels; hazardous and
toxic material warning signs; transformers and power pole
markers; personal hazard warnings; housekeeping and operational
warnings; pictograms; radiation and laser signs; safety
practices signs and regulatory markings; employment law posters;
and photo luminescent
(glow-in-the-dark)
tapes.
Warehouse identification products including self-adhesive
and self-aligning die-cut numbers and letters, labels, and tags
used to locate and identify inventory in storage facilities such
as warehouses, factories, stockrooms and other industrial
facilities.
Pipe markers and valve tags including plastic or metal,
self-adhesive or mechanically applied, stock or custom-designed
pieces for the identification of pipes and control valves in the
mechanical contractor and process industry markets. These
products are designed to help identify and provide information
as to the contents, direction of flow and special hazardous
properties of materials contained in piping systems, and to
facilitate repair or maintenance of the systems.
Asset-identification products that are an important part
of an effective asset-management program in a wide variety of
markets. These include self-adhesive or mechanically mounted
labels or tags made of aluminum, brass, stainless steel,
polycarbonate, vinyl, polyester, mylar and paper. These products
are also offered in tamper-evident varieties, and can be custom
designed to ensure brand protection from counterfeiting.
I-4
Safety
and Complementary Products
Lockout/tagout products under OSHA
regulations, all energy sources must be locked out
while machines are being serviced or maintained to prevent
accidental engagement and injury. The Companys products
allow its customers to comply with these regulations and to
ensure worker safety for a wide variety of energy- and
fluid-transmission systems and operating machinery.
Security and traffic control products including a variety
of security seals, parking permits and wristbands designed for
visitor control in financial, governmental, educational and
commercial facilities including meeting and convention sites.
The Company also offers a wide variety of traffic control
devices including traffic signs, directional and warning signs,
parking tags and permits, barriers, cones and other products
including barricading, visual warning systems, floor-marking
products, safety badges, and first aid cabinets/kits, among
others.
Spill control and
clean-up
products including synthetic sorbent materials in a variety
of shapes, sizes and configurations; spill kits, containment
booms, industrial rugs, absorbing pillows and pads, barrier
spill matting and granular absorbents; and other products for
absorbing and controlling chemical, oil-based and water-based
spills.
Wire
and Cable Identification
Brady manufactures a broad range of wire and cable-marking
products, including labels, sleeves, software that allows
customers to create their own labels, and printers to print and
apply them. These products mark and identify wires, cables and
their termination points to facilitate manufacturing,
construction, repair or maintenance of equipment, and data
communication and electrical wiring systems used in virtually
every industrial, power and communication market.
People
Identification
Identification systems and products including photo ID card
systems that combine biometrics, digital imaging and other
technologies to positively identify people; self-expiring name
tags that make use of migratory ink technology which, upon
activation, starts a timed process resulting in an altered
message, color or design to indicate expiration; and ID
accessories including lanyards, badge holders, badge reels and
attachments, as well as photo identification kits.
OEM
Market Products
High
Performance Identification
Brady produces a complete line of label materials and printing
systems to meet customers needs for identification
requirements for product identification, work in process
labeling and bar coding that perform under harsh or demanding
conditions, such as extreme temperatures, or environmental or
chemical exposure. Brady prints stock and custom labels and also
sells unprinted materials to enable customers to print their own
labels.
Precision
Die-Cut Parts
The Company develops customized precision die-cut products that
are used to seal, insulate, protect, shield or provide other
mechanical performance properties in the assembly of electronic,
telecommunications and other equipment, including mobile phones,
personal data assistants, computer hard disk drives, computers
and other devices. Solutions not only include the materials and
converting, but also automatic placement and other value-added
services. The Company also provides converting services to the
medical market for materials used in in-vitro diagnostic kits
and patient monitoring.
Wire
Identification
The Company produces a variety of high performance products used
to mark wires, wire bundles and cables in the manufacturing of a
variety of industrial, electrical and electronic equipment.
I-5
Other
Products
The Company also designs and produces software for barcoding and
inspection automation, industrial thermal-transfer printers and
other electromechanical devices to serve the growing and
specialized needs of customers in a wide variety of markets.
Industrial labeling systems, software, tapes, ribbons and label
stocks provide customers with the resources and flexibility to
produce signs and labels on demand at their site. The Company
also offers poster printers, cutting systems, laminators and
supplies to education and training markets.
Brady seeks to offer high quality products with rapid response
and superior service so that it can provide solutions to
customers that are better, faster and more economical than those
available from the Companys competitors. The Company
markets and sells its products domestically and internationally
through multiple channels including distributors, direct sales,
mail-order-catalog marketing, retail, and electronic access
through the Internet. The Company has long-standing
relationships with a broad range of electrical, safety,
industrial and other domestic and international distributors.
The Companys sales force seeks to establish and foster
ongoing relationships with the end-users and distributors by
providing technical application and product expertise.
The Company also direct markets certain products and those of
other manufacturers by catalog sales and outbound telemarketing
in both domestic and international markets. Such products
include industrial and facility identification products, safety
and regulatory-compliance products and original equipment
manufacturer component products, among others. Catalogs are
distributed in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada,
China, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and
the United Kingdom, and include
foreign-language
catalogs.
The Companys products are sold in a wide variety of
markets within the larger MRO and OEM markets, including
electrical, electronic, telecommunications, governmental, public
utility, commercial building, computers and computer components,
construction, general manufacturing, laboratory, transportation
equipment and education.
The Companys products go to market under a variety of
brand names. The Brady brand includes high-performance labels,
printers, software, safety and facility identification products,
lock-out/tag-out products, and precision die-cut parts and
specialty materials. Other die-cut materials are marketed as
Balkhausen or Tradex Converting products. Safety and facility
identification products are also marketed under the Safety Signs
Service brand and the Asterisco brand, with some lockout/tagout
products offered under the Prinzing and LOTO brands. In
addition, identification for the utility industry is marketed
under the Electromark brand and spill-control products are
marketed under the SPC brand; poster printers and cutting
systems for education and government markets are offered under
the Varitronics name brand; wire identification products are
marketed under the Modernotecnica brand and the Carroll brand;
direct marketing safety and facility identification products are
offered under the Seton, Emedco, Signals, Safetyshop, Clement
and Personnel Concepts names; security and identification badges
and systems are included in the Temtec, B.I.G.,
Identicard/Identicam, STOPware, J.A.M. Plastics, PromoVision,
and Quo-Luck brands; hand-held regulatory documentation systems
are available under the Tiscor name; and automatic
identification and bar code software is offered under the
Teklynx brand.
Manufacturing
Process and Raw Materials
The Company manufactures the majority of the products it sells,
while purchasing certain items from other manufacturers.
Products manufactured by the Company generally require a high
degree of precision and the application of adhesives with
chemical and physical properties suited for specific uses. The
Companys manufacturing processes include compounding,
coating, converting, melt-blown operations, software development
and printer design and assembly. The compounding process
involves the mixing of chemical batches for primers, top
coatings and adhesives. The coatings and adhesives are applied
to a wide variety of materials including polyester, polyimide,
cloth, paper, metal and metal foil. The converting process may
include embossing, perforating, laminating, die cutting,
slitting, and printing or marking the materials as required.
I-6
The Company produces the majority of the pressure sensitive
materials through an integrated manufacturing process. These
integrated manufacturing processes permit greater flexibility to
meet customer needs in product design and manufacture, and an
improved ability to provide specialized products designed to
meet the needs of specific applications. Bradys
cellular manufacturing processes and
just-in-time
inventory control are designed to attain profitability in small
orders by emphasizing flexibility and the maximization of assets
through quick turnaround and delivery, balanced with
optimization of lot sizes. Most of the Companys
manufacturing facilities have received ISO 9001 or 9002
certification.
The materials used in the products manufactured by the Company
consist primarily of plastic sheets and films, paper, metal and
metal foil, cloth, fiberglass, polypropylene, inks, dyes,
adhesives, pigments, natural and synthetic rubber, organic
chemicals, polymers, solvents and electronic components and
subassemblies. In addition, the Company purchases finished
products for resale. The Company purchases raw materials,
components and finished products from many suppliers. Overall,
the Company is not dependent upon any single supplier for its
most critical base materials or components; however the Company
has chosen in certain situations to sole source materials,
components or finished items for design or cost reasons. As a
result, disruptions in supply could have an impact on results
for a period of time, but generally these disruptions would
simply require qualification of new suppliers and the disruption
would be modest. In certain instances, the qualification process
could be more costly or take a longer period of time and in rare
circumstances, such as a global shortage of a critical material
or component, the financial impact could be significant.
Technology
and Product Development
The Company focuses its research and development efforts on
material development, printing systems design and software
development. Material development involves the application of
surface chemistry concepts for top coatings and adhesives
applied to a variety of base materials. Systems design
integrates materials, embedded software and a variety of
printing technologies to form a complete solution for customer
applications or the Companys own production requirements.
The Companys research and development team also supports
production and marketing efforts by providing application and
technical expertise.
The Company possesses patents covering various aspects of
adhesive chemistry, electronic circuitry, printing systems for
wire markers, systems for aligning letters and patterns, and
visually changing paper. Although the Company believes that its
patents are a significant factor in maintaining market position
for certain products, technology in the areas covered by many of
the patents is evolving rapidly and may limit the value of such
patents. The Companys business is not dependent on any
single patent or group of patents.
The Company conducts much of its research and development
activities at the Frederic S. Tobey Research and Innovation
Center (approximately 39,600 sq. ft.) in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. The Company spent approximately $36.0 million,
$30.4 million, and $25.1 million during the fiscal
years ended July 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, on
its research and development activities. In fiscal 2007,
approximately 250 employees were engaged in research and
development activities for the Company. Additional research
projects were conducted in Company facilities in other locations
in the United States, Europe and Asia and under contract with
universities, other institutions and consultants.
The Companys name and its registered trademarks are
important to each of its business segments. In addition, the
Company owns other important trademarks applicable to only
certain of its products.
In fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, sales from international
operations accounted for 60.9%, 57.6%, and 55.3%, respectively,
of the Companys sales. Its global infrastructure includes
subsidiaries in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China,
Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway,
Philippines, Poland, Singapore, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain,
Sweden, Thailand, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Most of these
locations manufacture or have the capability to manufacture
certain of the products they sell. In addition, Brady has sales
offices in Spain, Taiwan, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
Brady further markets its products to parts of Eastern Europe,
the Middle East, Africa and Russia.
I-7
The markets for all of the Companys products are
competitive. Brady believes that it is one of the leading
domestic producers of wire markers, safety signs, pipe markers,
label printing systems, precision die-cut materials and
bar-code-label-generating software. Brady competes for business
principally on the basis of production capabilities,
engineering, and research and development capabilities,
materials expertise, its global footprint, global account
management where needed, customer service and price. Product
quality is determined by factors such as suitability of
component materials for various applications, adhesive
properties, graphics quality, durability, product consistency
and workmanship. Competition in many of its product markets is
highly fragmented, ranging from smaller companies offering only
one or a few types of products, to some of the worlds
major adhesive and electrical product companies offering some
competing products as part of their overall product lines. A
number of Bradys competitors are larger than the Company
and have greater resources. Notwithstanding the resources of
these competitors, management believes that Brady provides a
broader range of identification solutions than any of them, and
that its global infrastructure is a significant competitive
advantage in serving large multi-national customers.
As of July 31, 2007, the amount of the Companys
backlog orders believed to be firm was $25.3 million. This
compares with $42.3 million and $24.9 million of
backlog orders as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Average delivery time for the Companys orders varies from
one day to one month, depending on the type of product, and
whether the product is stock or custom-designed and
manufactured. Average delivery time for the direct marketing
business can be as low as the same day or the next day. The
Companys backlog does not provide much visibility for
future business.
At present, the manufacturing processes for our adhesive-based
products utilize certain evaporative solvents, which, unless
controlled, would be vented into the atmosphere. Emissions of
these substances are regulated at the federal, state and local
levels. We have implemented a number of systems and procedures
to reduce atmospheric emissions
and/or to
recover solvents. Management believes we are substantially in
compliance with all environmental regulations.
As of July 31, 2007, the Company employed approximately
8,600 individuals. We have never experienced a material work
stoppage due to a labor dispute and consider our relations with
employees to be strong. The mix of employees is changing as we
employ more people in developing countries where wage rates are
lower and employee turnover tends to be higher than in developed
countries.
Information about the Companys acquisitions is provided in
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
|
|
(d)
|
Financial
Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export
Sales
|
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 7
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
|
|
(e)
|
Information
Available on the Internet
|
The Companys Corporate Internet address is
http://www.bradycorp.com.
The Company makes available, free of charge, on or through its
Internet website copies of its Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
Section 16 reports filed by the Companys insiders,
and amendments to all such reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC. We are not including the information
contained on or available through our website as part of, or
incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
I-8
Before making an investment decision with respect to our
stock, you should carefully consider the risks set forth below
and all other information contained in this report. If any of
the events contemplated by the following risks actually occur,
then our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be materially adversely affected.
Market
demand for our products may be susceptible to fluctuations in
the economy that may cause volatility in our results of
operations.
Sales of our products may be susceptible to changes in general
economic conditions, namely general downturns in the regional
economies in which we compete. Our business in the MRO market
tends to vary with the nominal GDP of the local economies in
which we manufacture and sell. As a result, in periods of
economic contraction, our business may not grow or may decline.
In the OEM market, we may be adversely affected by reduced
demand for our products due to downturns in the global economy
as this is a more volatile business than the MRO business. This
can result in higher degrees of volatility in our net sales and
results of operations. These more volatile markets include, but
are not limited to, mobile telecommunication devices, hard disk
drives and electronics in personal computers and other
electronic devices.
Our
current and future success could be impacted by our ability to
effectively integrate acquired companies and manage our
growth.
Our growth has and will continue to place significant demands on
our management and operational and financial resources. Since
the beginning of fiscal year 2004, we have acquired
26 companies. These recent and future acquisitions will
require integration of sales and marketing, information
technology, finance and administrative operations and
information of the newly acquired business. The successful
integration of acquisitions will require substantial attention
from our management and the management of the acquired
businesses, which could decrease the time they have to serve and
attract customers. We cannot assure that we will be able to
successfully integrate these recent or any future acquisitions,
that these acquisitions will operate profitably or that we will
be able to achieve the financial or operational success expected
from the acquisitions. Our financial condition, cash flows and
operational results could be adversely affected if we do not
successfully integrate the newly acquired businesses or if our
other businesses suffer on account of our increased focus on the
newly acquired businesses.
If we
fail to develop new products or our customers do not accept the
new products we develop, our business could be affected
adversely.
Development of proprietary products is key to the success of our
core growth and our high gross margins now and in the future.
Therefore, we must continue to develop new and innovative
products and acquire and retain the necessary intellectual
property rights in these products on an ongoing basis. If we
fail to make innovations, or the market does not accept our new
products, then our financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected. We continue to invest in the
development and marketing of new products. These expenditures do
not always result in products that will be accepted by the
market. Failure to develop successful new products may also
cause our customers to buy from a competitor or may cause us to
lower our prices in order to compete. This could have an adverse
impact on our profitability.
We may
be adversely impacted by an inability to identify and complete
acquisitions.
A large part of our growth since fiscal 2003 has come through
acquisitions and a key component of our growth strategy is based
upon acquisitions. We may not be able to identify acquisition
targets or successfully complete acquisitions in the future due
to the absence of quality companies, economic conditions, or
price expectations from sellers. If we are unable to complete
additional acquisitions, our growth may be limited.
I-9
We
operate in competitive markets and may be forced to cut our
prices or incur additional costs to remain competitive, which
may have a negative impact on our profitability.
We face substantial competition, particularly in the OEM markets
we serve. Competition may force us to cut our prices or incur
additional costs to remain competitive. We compete on the basis
of production capabilities, engineering and R&D
capabilities, materials expertise, our global footprint,
customer service and price. Present or future competitors may
have greater financial, technical or other resources, lower
production costs or other pricing advantages, any of which could
put us at a disadvantage in the affected business by threatening
our market share in some markets or reducing our profit margins.
Our
goodwill or other intangible assets may become impaired, which
may negatively impact our results of operations.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill and other intangible
assets on our balance sheet as a result of our acquisitions. As
of July 31, 2007, we had $737.5 million of goodwill on
our balance sheet, representing the excess of the total purchase
price for our acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets
we acquired, and $149.8 million of other intangible assets,
primarily representing the fair value of the customer
relationships, patents and trademarks we acquired in our
acquisitions. At July 31, 2007, goodwill and other
intangible assets represented approximately 52% of our total
assets. We evaluate this goodwill annually for impairment based
on the fair value of each operating segment. We assess the
impairment of other intangible assets quarterly based upon the
expected future cash flows of the respective assets. These
valuations could change if there were to be future changes in
our capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital
expenditures, or our ability to perform in accordance with our
forecasts. If this estimated fair value changes in future
periods, we may be required to record an impairment charge
related to goodwill or other intangible assets, which would have
the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses
in such period.
We
have a concentration of business with several large key
customers and distributors and loss of one or more of these
customers could significantly affect our results of
operations.
Several of our large key customers in the OEM market,
specifically the precision die-cut business, together comprise a
significant portion of our revenues. Our largest customer
represents approximately 5% of our net sales. Additionally in
the MRO markets, we do business with several large distribution
companies. Our dependence on these large customers makes our
relationships with these customers important to our business. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain these
relationships and retain this business in the future. Because
these large customers account for such a significant portion of
our revenues, they possess relatively greater capacity to
negotiate a reduction in the prices we charge for our products.
If we are unable to provide products to our customers at prices
acceptable to them, some of our customers may in the future
elect to shift some or all of this business to competitors or to
substitute other manufacturers products. If one of our key
customers consolidates, is acquired by another company or loses
market share, the result of that event may have an adverse
impact on our business. The loss of or reduction of business
from one or more of these large key customers could have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations.
We
increasingly conduct a sizable amount of our manufacturing
outside of the United States, which may present additional risks
to our business.
As a result of our strong growth in developing economies,
particularly in Asia, a significant portion of our sales is
attributable to products manufactured outside of the United
States. More than half of our approximately 8,600 employees
and more than half of our manufacturing locations are outside of
the United States. Our international operations are generally
subject to various risks including political, economic and
societal instability, the imposition of trade restrictions,
local labor market conditions, the effects of income taxes, and
differences in business practices. We may incur increased costs
and experience delays or disruptions in product deliveries and
payments in connection with international manufacturing and
sales that could cause loss of revenue. Unfavorable changes in
the political, regulatory and business climate in countries
where we have operations could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
I-10
Our
ability to continue to source low cost MRO products from regions
such as China may decline. Conversely, low cost sourcing may
also present risks to our revenue if our MRO customers choose to
source cheaper products from low cost regions.
An increasing portion of our MRO products is expected to be
sourced from low cost regions in the future. Changes in export
laws, suppliers and disruption in transportation routes could
lessen our ability to source these products and adversely impact
our results. Additionally, our MRO distributors/customers may
seek low cost sourcing opportunities directly, which could cause
a loss of business that may adversely impact our revenues.
Foreign
currency fluctuations could adversely affect our sales and
profits.
More than half of our revenues are derived outside of the United
States. As such, fluctuations in foreign currency can have an
adverse impact on our sales and profits as amounts that are
measured in foreign currency are translated back to
U.S. dollars. Any increase in the value of the
U.S. dollar in relation to the value of the local currency
will adversely affect our revenues from our foreign operations
when translated into U.S. dollars. Similarly, any decrease
in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the value of
the local currency will increase our development costs in our
foreign operations, to the extent such costs are payable in
foreign currency, when translated into U.S. dollars. During
fiscal year 2007, the weakening U.S. dollar versus the
majority of other currencies increased sales by approximately
$41.7 million.
We
depend on our key personnel and the loss of these personnel
could have an adverse effect on our operations.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued
services of our key executives, managers and other skilled
personnel. We cannot ensure that we will be able to retain our
key officers and employees. The departure of our key personnel
without adequate replacement could severely disrupt our business
operations. Additionally, we need qualified managers and skilled
employees with technical and manufacturing industry experience
to operate our business successfully. If we are unable to
attract and retain qualified individuals or our costs to do so
increase significantly, our operations would be materially
adversely affected.
We may
be unable to successfully implement anticipated changes to our
information technology system.
We are now in the process of upgrading certain portions of our
information technology. Part of this upgrade includes continued
implementations of SAP in our facilities in China, Europe,
Malaysia, Singapore, Mexico, India and the United States. In
fiscal 2007, we completed the implementation at 16 of our
facilities in these regions, and expect to continue this pace in
future years. We expect that this implementation of the SAP
platform will enable us to more effectively and efficiently
manage our supply chain and business processes. Our failure to
successfully manage the SAP implementation process or implement
these upgrades as scheduled could cause us to incur unexpected
costs or to lose customers or sales, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results.
The
increase in our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our
financial health and make us vulnerable to adverse economic
conditions.
We have incurred indebtedness to finance acquisitions and for
other general corporate purposes. Any increase in our level of
indebtedness could have important consequences, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
it may be difficult for us to fulfill our obligations under our
credit or other debt agreements;
|
|
|
|
it may be more challenging or costly to obtain additional
financing to fund our future growth;
|
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to future interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash
flows to service our debt, thereby reducing the amount of cash
available to fund new product development, capital expenditures,
working capital and other general corporate activities;
|
I-11
|
|
|
|
|
it may place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
it may limit our flexibility in planning for and reacting to
changes in our business.
|
Environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations could adversely affect
our business.
Our facilities and operations are subject to numerous laws and
regulations relating to air emissions, wastewater discharges,
the handling of hazardous materials and wastes, manufacturing
and disposal of certain materials, and regulations otherwise
relating to health, safety and the protection of the
environment. Our products may also be governed by regulations in
the countries where they are sold. As a result, we may need to
devote management time or expend significant resources on
compliance, and we have incurred and will continue to incur
capital and other expenditures to comply with these regulations.
Any significant costs may have a material adverse impact on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Further, these laws and regulations are constantly evolving and
it is impossible to predict accurately the effect they may have
upon our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
The Company currently operates 61 manufacturing or distribution
facilities in the following regions:
Americas: Seventeen are located in the United
States; three each in Brazil and Mexico; and one in Canada.
Europe: Four are located in the United
Kingdom; three are each located in France and Germany; two each
in Belgium and Sweden; and one each in Denmark, Italy, Norway
and Slovakia.
Asia-Pacific: Seven are located in China; four
in Australia; three in Thailand; two in South Korea; and one
each in Singapore, India, and Malaysia.
The Companys present operating facilities contain a total
of approximately 3.9 million square feet of space, of which
approximately 2.8 million square feet is leased. The
Company believes that its equipment and facilities are modern,
well maintained and adequate for present needs.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The Company is, and may in the future be, party to litigation
arising in the normal course of business. The Company is not
currently a party to any material pending legal proceedings in
which management believes the ultimate resolution would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended July 31,
2007.
I-12
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Brady Corporation Class A Nonvoting Common Stock trades on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BRC. The quarterly
stock price history on the New York Stock Exchange is as follows
for each of the quarters in the fiscal years ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
4th Quarter
|
|
$
|
37.73
|
|
|
$
|
32.73
|
|
|
$
|
42.79
|
|
|
$
|
32.94
|
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
|
$
|
28.80
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.37
|
|
|
$
|
30.91
|
|
|
$
|
40.49
|
|
|
$
|
34.67
|
|
|
$
|
35.70
|
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.52
|
|
|
$
|
35.70
|
|
|
$
|
39.98
|
|
|
$
|
28.20
|
|
|
$
|
32.22
|
|
|
$
|
26.75
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.68
|
|
|
$
|
33.16
|
|
|
$
|
34.22
|
|
|
$
|
26.98
|
|
|
$
|
27.49
|
|
|
$
|
21.01
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted for a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100%
stock dividend, effective December 31, 2004. |
There is no trading market for the Companys Class B
Voting Common Stock.
As of September 24, 2007, there were 711 Class A
Common Stock shareholders of record and approximately
4,100 beneficial shareholders. There are three
Class B Common Stock shareholders.
|
|
(c)
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.
The Company has followed a practice of paying quarterly
dividends on outstanding common stock. Before any dividend may
be paid on the Class B Common Stock, holders of the
Class A Common Stock are entitled to receive an annual,
noncumulative cash dividend of $0.01665 per share (subject to
adjustment in the event of future stock splits, stock dividends
or similar events involving shares of Class A Common
Stock). Thereafter, any further dividend in that fiscal year
must be paid on all shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock on an equal basis. The Companys
revolving credit agreement restricts the amount of certain types
of payments, including dividends, that can be made annually to
$50 million plus 75% of the consolidated net income for the
prior fiscal year. The Company believes that based on its
historic dividend practice, this restriction will not impede it
in following a similar dividend practice in the future.
During the two most recent fiscal years and for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company declared the following
dividends per share on its Class A and Class B Common
Stock for the years ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1st Qtr
|
|
1st Qtr
|
|
2nd Qtr
|
|
3rd Qtr
|
|
4th Qtr
|
|
1st Qtr
|
|
2nd Qtr
|
|
3rd Qtr
|
|
4th Qtr
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
0.13335
|
|
|
|
0.123
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.113
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
II-1
|
|
(e)
|
Common
Stock Price Performance Graph
|
The graph below shows a comparison of the cumulative return over
the last five fiscal years had $100 been invested at the close
of business on July 31, 2002, in each of Brady Corporation
Class A Common Stock, The Standard & Poors
(S&P) 500 index, the Standard and Poors Small Cap 600
index, and the Russell 2000 index.
Comparison
of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return*
Among Brady Corporation, The S&P 500 Index,
The S&P Smallcap 600 Index and The Russell 2000
Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on 7/31/02 in stock or index including
reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ended July 31.
Copyright©
2002, Standard & Poors, a division of The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. |
II-2
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Years Ended July 31, 2003 through 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales(1)
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
|
$
|
671,219
|
|
|
$
|
554,866
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
657,044
|
|
|
|
525,755
|
|
|
|
433,276
|
|
|
|
345,361
|
|
|
|
279,149
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
30,443
|
|
|
|
25,078
|
|
|
|
23,028
|
|
|
|
18,873
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
449,103
|
|
|
|
338,796
|
|
|
|
285,746
|
|
|
|
248,171
|
|
|
|
219,861
|
|
Restructuring charge
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
|
|
9,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
485,057
|
|
|
|
369,239
|
|
|
|
310,824
|
|
|
|
274,380
|
|
|
|
248,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
171,987
|
|
|
|
156,516
|
|
|
|
122,452
|
|
|
|
70,981
|
|
|
|
30,826
|
|
Other (Expense)
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other
income net
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,934
|
)
|
|
|
(14,231
|
)
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
(1,231
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other (expense) income
|
|
|
(20,059
|
)
|
|
|
(11,828
|
)
|
|
|
(7,034
|
)
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
151,928
|
|
|
|
144,688
|
|
|
|
115,418
|
|
|
|
70,327
|
|
|
|
32,455
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
42,540
|
|
|
|
40,513
|
|
|
|
33,471
|
|
|
|
19,456
|
|
|
|
11,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
|
$
|
50,871
|
|
|
$
|
21,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Diluted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A nonvoting
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
Class B voting
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
Cash Dividends on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
Balance Sheet at July
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
303,359
|
|
|
$
|
240,537
|
|
|
$
|
141,560
|
|
|
$
|
131,706
|
|
|
$
|
123,878
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,698,857
|
|
|
|
1,365,186
|
|
|
|
850,147
|
|
|
|
697,900
|
|
|
|
449,519
|
|
Long-term obligations, less
current maturities
|
|
|
478,575
|
|
|
|
350,018
|
|
|
|
150,026
|
|
|
|
150,019
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Stockholders investment
|
|
|
891,012
|
|
|
|
746,046
|
|
|
|
497,274
|
|
|
|
403,315
|
|
|
|
338,961
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
136,018
|
|
|
|
114,896
|
|
|
|
119,103
|
|
|
|
87,646
|
|
|
|
57,316
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,856
|
|
|
|
35,144
|
|
|
|
26,822
|
|
|
|
20,190
|
|
|
|
17,771
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(51,940
|
)
|
|
|
(39,410
|
)
|
|
|
(21,920
|
)
|
|
|
(14,892
|
)
|
|
|
(14,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales has been impacted by the acquisitive nature of the
Company as seven, eleven and four acquisitions were completed in
fiscal years ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. See Note 2 in Item 8 for further
information on the acquisitions that were completed in each of
the years. |
II-3
Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
In fiscal 2007, the Company posted record sales of
$1,362.6 million and record net income of
$109.4 million, an increase of 33.8% and 5.0%,
respectively, over fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2007, the Company
completed seven acquisitions and further expansions into Mexico,
Thailand, Malaysia, India, China and the Philippines, among
other geographic areas.
Of the 33.8% increase in sales, organic growth accounted for
4.2%, acquisitions added 25.5%, and foreign currency translation
increased sales by 4.1%. Americas sales increased 22.2%,
European sales rose 30.4%, and sales from the Asia-Pacific
region increased 68.1%.
Net income for fiscal 2007 rose 5.0% to $109.4 million or
$2.00 per diluted share of Class A Common Stock, compared
to $104.2 million, or $2.07 per diluted share of Class A
Common Stock in fiscal 2006.
In fiscal 2007, the Company continued to focus on leveraging its
strengths and continued its drive to become the number one or
two leader in the markets that it serves. Acquisitions were
concentrated in businesses that management understands well in
order to deepen market penetration or expand the Companys
global footprint. The Company also invested in expanding many of
its global operations with new equipment, information systems
and capacity, and adjusted operating capacities to achieve
efficiencies and cost savings.
Brady acquired seven companies in fiscal 2007 including
businesses that span the globe from the Americas to Europe to
Asia-Pacific. We have added strategically driven acquisitions in
people identification, medical precision die-cut, direct
marketing and safety and facility products in the United States,
safety and facility products and wire identification in Europe,
high performance labeling in South America, and people
identification and safety and facility products in the
Asia-Pacific region.
Brady completed the transition to a new 50,000 square foot
facility in Penang, Malaysia in fiscal 2007 after having
outgrown its previous space. Other geographic expansions during
the year included the start of new operations in Dongguan
(China), Xiamen (China), Bangalore (India), Reynosa (Mexico),
Queretaro (Mexico) and Cainta Rizal (Philippines), as well as
the development of a state-of-the-art facility in Pathumthani
(Thailand). Brady strives to employ the same high safety and
environmental standards across the globe regardless of lesser
government requirements in some areas.
Brady remains a financially strong company, with a solid balance
sheet and strong cash flows. In September 2007, the Company
announced that it will be increasing its cash dividend payment
for the 22nd straight year.
II-4
Results
of Operations
Year
Ended July 31, 2007, Compared to Year Ended July 31,
2006
The comparability of the operating results for the fiscal years
ended July 31, 2007 to July 31, 2006, has been
impacted by the following acquisitions completed in fiscal 2007,
as well as the annualized impact of the acquisitions completed
in fiscal 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions:
|
|
Segment
|
|
Date Completed
|
|
Comprehensive Identification
Products, Inc. (CIPI)
|
|
Americas, Europe
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Precision Converters, L.P.
(Precision Converters)
|
|
Americas
|
|
October 2006
|
Scafftag, Ltd., Safetrak, Ltd. and
Scafftag Pty., Ltd. (collectively
|
|
Americas, Europe and
|
|
December 2006
|
Scafftag)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Asterisco Artes Graficas Ltda.
(Asterisco)
|
|
Americas
|
|
December 2006
|
Modernotecnica SpA
(Moderno)
|
|
Europe
|
|
December 2006
|
Clement Communications, Inc.
(Clement)
|
|
Americas
|
|
February 2007
|
Sorbent Products Co., Inc.
(SPC)
|
|
Americas, Europe and
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Sales for fiscal 2007 increased by $344.2 million, or 33.8%
from fiscal 2006. Organic sales, defined as sales in the
Companys existing core businesses and regions (exclusive
of acquisitions and foreign currency effects), increased
$42.3 million or 4.2% for the same period. The acquisitions
listed above and the annualized impact of the fiscal 2006
acquisitions increased sales by $260.2 million or 25.5% in
fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. Fluctuations in the
exchange rates used to translate financial results into the
United States Dollar resulted in a sales increase of
$41.7 million or 4.1% for the year.
The gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased from 51.6%
in fiscal 2006 to 48.2% in fiscal 2007. This decline was driven
by the results in our OEM electronics business, primarily in the
mobile handset business in Asia-Pacific. The decline was also
driven by the acquisitions that Brady completed in the last
12 months, which were more heavily weighted towards OEM
electronics, which is generally characterized by lower gross
margins and lower selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses.
Research and development expenses grew to $36.0 million in
fiscal 2007 from $30.4 million in fiscal 2006, but
decreased as a percentage of sales from 3.0% in fiscal 2006 to
2.6% in fiscal 2007. Brady continues to expand its investment in
new product development.
SG&A expenses of $449.1 million in fiscal 2007, as
compared to $338.8 million in fiscal 2006, decreased as a
percentage of sales from 33.3% in fiscal 2006 to 33.0% in fiscal
2007. The decrease was due to changes in the Companys
sales mix towards the OEM electronics business, which typically
has lower SG&A expense.
The Company recorded expenses of $11.4 million in fiscal
year 2007 for cost reduction actions, which are primarily
recorded in SG&A expenses in the consolidated statements of
income. These actions consisted of $9.2 million for
severance and other employee termination costs,
$1.8 million for asset write-offs and $0.4 million for
facility closure costs. Pre-tax savings from these actions, and
the exit activity charges for planned integration activities of
acquisitions completed in the last 12 months that increased
goodwill by $8.8 million, are expected to be approximately
$14 million in fiscal 2008.
Investment and other income increased $0.5 million in
fiscal 2007 from the prior year. The income recorded in fiscal
2007 was primarily due to interest income earned on cash and
marketable securities investments, while the income recorded in
fiscal 2006 was primarily due to a gain of approximately
$1.5 million on a currency option that the Company
purchased to hedge against increases in the purchase price in
U.S. dollar terms of Tradex Converting AB as the
transaction was denominated in Swedish Krona.
Interest expense increased $8.7 million in fiscal 2007 due
to interest on the $150 million private placement of senior
notes that the Company completed in the third quarter of fiscal
2007 and the $200 million private placement
II-5
of senior notes that the Company completed in second quarter of
fiscal 2006, as well as interest on the borrowings under our
revolving credit facility in fiscal 2007.
The Companys effective tax rate was 28.0% in both fiscal
2007 and 2006.
Net income for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007,
increased 5.0% to $109.4 million, compared to
$104.2 million for fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, as
a result of the factors noted above. Diluted net income per
share comparisons between fiscal 2007 of $2.00 per share and
2006 of $2.07 per share were also affected by the greater number
of shares outstanding in fiscal 2007 as a result of the
Companys July 2006 sale of an additional 4.6 million
shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock in a public
offering.
Year
Ended July 31, 2006, Compared to Year Ended July 31,
2005
The comparability of the operating results for the fiscal years
ended July 31, 2006 to July 31, 2005 was impacted by
the following acquisitions completed in fiscal 2006, as well as
the annualized impact of the acquisitions completed in fiscal
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions:
|
|
Segment
|
|
Date Completed
|
|
STOPware, Inc.
(Stopware)
|
|
Americas
|
|
August 2005
|
Texit Danmark AS and Texit Norge AS
|
|
Europe
|
|
September 2005
|
(collectively Texit)
|
|
|
|
|
TruMed Technologies, Inc.
(TruMed)
|
|
Americas
|
|
October 2005
|
QDP Thailand Co., Ltd
(QDPT)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
October 2005
|
J.A.M. Plastics Inc.
(J.A.M.)
|
|
Americas
|
|
December 2005
|
Personnel Concepts
|
|
Americas
|
|
January 2006
|
IDenticard Systems, Inc. and
Identicam Systems
|
|
Americas
|
|
February 2006
|
(collectively
Identicard)
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental Health &
Safety Pty. Ltd and
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
March 2006
|
Trafalgar First Aid Pty. Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
(collectively Accidental
Health)
|
|
|
|
|
Tradex Converting AB
(Tradex)
|
|
Americas, Europe
and Asia-Pacific
|
|
May 2006
|
Carroll Australasia Pty. Ltd.
(Carroll)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
June 2006
|
Daewon Industry Corporation
(Daewon)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
July 2006
|
Sales for fiscal 2006 increased by $202.0 million, or 24.7%
from fiscal 2005. Organic sales, defined as sales in the
Companys existing core businesses and regions (exclusive
of acquisitions and foreign currency effects), increased
$75.4 million or 9.2% for the same period. The acquisitions
listed above and the annualized impact of the fiscal 2005
acquisitions increased sales by $130.3 million or 16.0% in
fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. Fluctuations in the
exchange rates used to translate financial results into the
United States Dollar decreased sales by $3.7 million or
0.5% for the year.
The gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased from 53.1%
in fiscal 2005 to 51.6% in fiscal 2006. The decrease was
primarily due to a decline in Asia-Pacific attributable to
acquisition mix, a shift in the product mix towards OEM
electronics and cost pressures not offset by sales price
increases, and a decline in Europe due to acquisition mix,
partially offset by an increase in the Americas due to sales
price increases, cost reductions and acquisition mix.
Research and development expenses grew to $30.4 million in
fiscal 2006 from $25.1 million in fiscal 2005, but fell
slightly as a percentage of sales from 3.1% in fiscal 2005 to
3.0% in fiscal 2006. Research and development spending increases
of 21.4% were slightly less than the 24.7% increase in sales in
fiscal 2006.
SG&A expenses of $338.8 million decreased as a
percentage of sales from 35.0% in fiscal 2005 to 33.3% in fiscal
2006. The decrease was due primarily to cost efficiencies gained
in the existing businesses in all regions
II-6
driven by organic sales growth and cost control and a change in
our business mix, partially offset by higher SG&A expenses
from the acquisitions completed in fiscal 2006.
Investment and other income increased $1.0 million in
fiscal 2006 from the prior year, primarily due to a gain of
approximately $1.5 million on a currency option that the
Company purchased to hedge against increases in the purchase
price in U.S. dollar terms of Tradex as the transaction was
denominated in Swedish Krona.
Interest expense increased $5.8 million in fiscal 2006 due
to the interest on the $200 million private placement that
was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2006.
The Companys effective tax rate decreased from 29.0% for
fiscal 2005 to 28.0% for fiscal 2006. The decrease in the
effective tax rate was due to a continuing shift to a higher
percentage of the Companys pre-tax income coming from
lower tax rate countries.
Business
Segment Operating Results
Management of the Company evaluates results based on the
following geographic regions: Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Subtotals
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
SALES TO EXTERNAL
CUSTOMERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
609,855
|
|
|
$
|
416,514
|
|
|
$
|
336,262
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
498,916
|
|
|
|
319,432
|
|
|
|
200,088
|
|
|
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018,436
|
|
July 31, 2005
|
|
|
417,780
|
|
|
|
274,691
|
|
|
|
123,976
|
|
|
|
816,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816,447
|
|
SALES GROWTH
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Currency
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
68.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
Year ended July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Currency
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
SEGMENT PROFIT (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
142,306
|
|
|
$
|
107,552
|
|
|
$
|
57,236
|
|
|
$
|
307,094
|
|
|
$
|
(8,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
298,886
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
122,525
|
|
|
|
83,970
|
|
|
|
49,316
|
|
|
|
255,811
|
|
|
|
(10,633
|
)
|
|
|
245,178
|
|
July 31, 2005
|
|
|
98,193
|
|
|
|
79,792
|
|
|
|
34,228
|
|
|
|
212,213
|
|
|
|
(4,845
|
)
|
|
|
207,368
|
|
II-7
NET
INCOME RECONCILIATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended:
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Total profit for reportable
segments
|
|
$
|
307,094
|
|
|
$
|
255,811
|
|
|
$
|
212,213
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(8,208
|
)
|
|
|
(10,633
|
)
|
|
|
(4,845
|
)
|
Unallocated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative costs
|
|
|
(126,899
|
)
|
|
|
(88,662
|
)
|
|
|
(84,916
|
)
|
Investment and other
income net
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,934
|
)
|
|
|
(14,231
|
)
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
151,928
|
|
|
|
144,688
|
|
|
|
115,418
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(42,540
|
)
|
|
|
(40,513
|
)
|
|
|
(33,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company evaluates regional performance using sales and
segment profit. Segment profit or loss does not include certain
administrative costs, such as the cost of finance, stock
options, information technology and human resources, which are
managed as global functions. Interest, investment and other
income and income taxes are also excluded when evaluating
regional performance. The increased administrative costs in
fiscal 2007 include $11.4 million of expenses associated
with cost reduction charges.
Americas
Sales in the Americas region increased 22.2% from fiscal 2006 to
fiscal 2007, and 19.4% from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006. Organic
growth accounted for 3.3% in 2007 and 5.0% in 2006. The organic
growth in fiscal 2007 was due to strong growth in the United
States in both the Brady and direct marketing brands, with
strong results from the electrical and wire identification
products. The growth was partially offset by the planned
transfer of die cut business to Asia-Pacific in the early part
of the year. Canada and Brazil also experienced year-over-year
growth. The organic growth in fiscal 2006 was due to strong
growth in the United States in our safety, electrical, and
industrial markets. Our operations in Canada, Mexico and Brazil
also provided year-over-year organic sales growth in 2006 in the
Brady brand business. Within the direct marketing business, base
sales increased in 2006 over the prior year as well. The
acquisitions of TruMed, J.A.M., Personnel Concepts and
Identicard in fiscal 2006 and CIPI, Precision Converters,
Scafftag, Asterisco, Clement and SPC in fiscal 2007 added 18.4%
to fiscal 2007 sales. The acquisitions of Electromark in fiscal
2005 and Stopware, TruMed, J.A.M., Personnel Concepts and
Identicard in fiscal 2006 added 12.9% to fiscal 2006 sales. The
positive effect of fluctuations in the exchange rates used to
translate financial results into U.S. currency increased
sales in the region by 0.5% and 1.5% in fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
In the Americas region, segment profit as a percentage of sales
decreased from 24.6% in 2006 to 23.3% in 2007. This decrease was
due to the effect of the recent acquisitions. As expected, the
segments recent acquisitions have produced an initial rate
of profit that is below the average rate of profit of the
segment. As the businesses are integrated and synergies are
achieved, the profit percentages are expected to increase.
Comparing fiscal 2006 to 2005, segment profit as a percentage of
sales increased from 23.5% to 24.6%, due to the increase in
sales volume and sales prices, partially offset by increases in
many of the segments material and utility costs. Also, as
expected, the acquisitions completed in 2006 reported an initial
rate of profit that was below the average of the region.
Europe
Sales in the European region increased 30.4% in fiscal 2007 from
fiscal 2006 and 16.3% in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005. Organic
growth accounted for 8.3% in fiscal 2007 and 4.2% in fiscal
2006. The organic growth reported in fiscal 2007 was due to
growth in the majority of the businesses and countries as the
European economy continued to strengthen. Business in the region
has benefited from recent No Smoking legislation
enacted in France and in the United Kingdom, which stimulated
demand for certain of our product lines. The increase in the
organic growth in fiscal 2006 was due to modest growth in the
direct marketing business as a result of continuing to add new
customers and expand product offerings and growth from expansion
into newer geographies for the Brady brand
II-8
business, primarily from the expansion into Slovakia, Turkey and
the Nordic region. Foreign currency translation increased the
regions sales by 9.0% from fiscal 2006 to 2007 compared to
a decrease in the regions sales of 4.3% from fiscal 2005
to 2006. The acquisitions of Texit and Tradex in fiscal 2006 and
CIPI, Scafftag, Moderno and SPC in fiscal 2007 added 13.1% to
the regions sales in fiscal 2007 and the acquisitions of
Texit and Tradex in fiscal 2006 and Signs and Labels in fiscal
2005 added 16.4% to the regions sales in fiscal 2006.
Segment profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 25.8% in
fiscal 2007 from 26.3% in fiscal 2006 and decreased from 29.0%
in fiscal 2005 to 26.3% in fiscal 2006. The decrease experienced
in fiscal 2007 from 2006 was due to the global headquarter costs
of Tradex, partially offset by the strong performance of the
direct marketing businesses in the region. The decrease
experienced in fiscal 2006 from 2005 was due to the impact of a
stronger U.S. dollar, the profit dilution caused by the
start-up of
business in Slovakia and the integration and acquisition-related
costs from the June 2005 acquisition of Signs and Labels and the
May 2006 acquisition of Tradex. As Tradexs headquarters
are in Sweden, all of the headquarter costs are reflected in the
Europe segment in 2006.
Asia-Pacific
Asia-Pacific sales increased 68.1% in fiscal 2007 from fiscal
2006 and 61.4% in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005. Organic sales
declined 0.4% in fiscal 2007 and increased 34.7% in fiscal 2006.
The decline in organic sales in fiscal 2007 was due to a
slowdown in our OEM electronics business, led by the loss of
certain programs in the hard disk drive business related to
industry consolidation and a slowdown in high performance
labeling. The increase in organic sales for fiscal 2006 was due
to the high demand for consumer electronics and strong growth in
the Australian direct marketing and safety businesses. Of the
34.7% increase in organic growth in fiscal 2006, a significant
portion was driven by growth in China as the Asian economy
strengthened. Foreign currency translation increased the
regions sales by 5.2% from fiscal 2006 to 2007 compared to
an increase of 1.6% from fiscal 2005 to 2006. The acquisitions
of QDPT, Accidental Health, Tradex, Carroll and Daewon in fiscal
2006 and CIPI, Scafftag and SPC in fiscal 2007 added 63.3% to
the regions sales in fiscal 2007, whereas the acquisitions
of Technology Print Supply and Technology Supply Media in fiscal
2005 and QDPT, Accidental Health, Tradex, Carroll and Daewon in
fiscal 2006 added 25.1% to the regions sales in fiscal
2006.
Segment profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 17.0% in
fiscal 2007 from 24.7% in fiscal 2006 and to 24.7% in fiscal
2006 from 27.6% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in fiscal 2007 was
due to the slowdown in our OEM electronics business, excess
capacity at our facilities and lower margins from acquisitions.
By the end of fiscal 2007, we had nearly completed the capacity
and footprint changes that were necessary to reduce our cost
structure and be closer to our customers facilities. These
changes are expected to result in a reduced cost base for the
upcoming year, but we should still be able to support sudden
spikes in customer demand. The decrease experienced in fiscal
2006 was due to the continued shift of business mix towards the
die cut business, which experiences lower margins, combined with
pricing pressures from our OEM customers, and the lower initial
rate of profit produced by the companies acquired in the region.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents were $142.8 million at
July 31, 2007, compared to $113.0 million at
July 31, 2006. Additionally, short-term investments,
consisting of investments in auction rate securities, were
$19.2 million at July 31, 2007, compared to
$11.5 million at July 31, 2006. Working capital
increased $62.9 million during fiscal 2007 to
$303.4 million and increased $98.9 million during
fiscal 2006 to $240.5 million. Accounts receivable balances
increased $51.7 million from July 31, 2006 to
July 31, 2007. The increase in accounts receivable was due
primarily to increased sales volume, foreign currency
translation and accounts receivable balances added from
acquisitions completed during fiscal 2007. Inventories increased
$29.9 million from July 31, 2006 to July 31, 2007
due to foreign currency translation, inventory of acquired
companies, and increased inventory levels to support the launch
of new products and to maintain adequate service levels for our
customers. Current liabilities increased $61.4 million due
to the inclusion of principal debt payments that are due for
payment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 which were included
in long-term obligations in the prior year, an increase in
accounts payable from the fiscal 2007 acquisitions, and an
increase in other current liabilities as a result of our cost
reduction activities.
II-9
The Company has maintained significant cash balances due in
large part to its strong operating cash flow, which totaled
$136.0 million for fiscal 2007, $114.9 million for
fiscal 2006 and $119.1 million for fiscal 2005. The
increase from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 was the result of a
$5.2 million increase in net income and an
$18.7 million increase in depreciation and amortization
primarily due to the tangible and intangible assets acquired in
fiscal 2006 and 2007, partially offset by cash requirements for
changes in operating assets and liabilities. In accordance with
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based
Payment on August 1, 2005, the Company has classified
the income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options
subsequent to adoption as a financing cash inflow. Prior to
adoption, this tax benefit was recorded in cash flows from
operations and totaled $5.4 million for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2005.
The acquisitions of businesses used $159.5 million in
fiscal 2007, $351.3 million in fiscal 2006, and
$79.9 million in fiscal 2005. Contingent consideration
payments of $10.9 million were paid during fiscal 2007 to
satisfy the $6.5 million holdback requirement of the ID
Technologies acquisition completed in fiscal 2005, the
$1.0 million earnout liability of the Stopware acquisition
completed in fiscal 2006, the $1.8 million purchase price
adjustment of the Daewon acquisition completed in fiscal 2006
and the $1.6 million earnout liability of the QDPT
acquisition completed in fiscal 2006.
Capital expenditures were $51.9 million in fiscal 2007,
$39.4 million in fiscal 2006 and $21.9 million in
fiscal 2005. $9.8 million was spent during fiscal 2007 on
implementing SAP in 16 of Bradys global operations and
ultimately bringing the number of users up from approximately
2,300 to approximately 6,700 in the next three years. The
remainder of the increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2007
was due to expansions in China, Canada, India, Mexico, the
Philippines, Slovakia and other locations. Capital expenditures
in 2006 were driven by the completion of the central
distribution warehouse in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, continued
expansion in Asia, new facilities in Slovakia and in Canada and
by upgrading existing plant and machinery. Capital expenditures
in 2005 included plant expansions in China and the start of the
addition of the central distribution warehouse in Milwaukee.
Financing activities provided $129.4 million of cash in
fiscal 2007, provided $319.0 million in fiscal 2006 and
used $9.7 million in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, the
Company completed a secondary public offering of
4.6 million shares of its Class A nonvoting common
stock and received proceeds of $157.7 million. Cash used
for dividends to shareholders was $30.1 million in fiscal
2007, $26.1 million in fiscal 2006 and $21.3 million
in fiscal 2005. Cash received from the exercise of stock options
was $6.8 million in fiscal 2007, $8.9 million in
fiscal 2006 and $15.7 million in fiscal 2005. The Company
did not purchase treasury stock in fiscal 2007, but purchased
treasury stock of $24.7 million in fiscal 2006 and
$1.6 million in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, a stock
repurchase plan was implemented by purchasing shares on the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions, with repurchased
shares available for use in connection with the Companys
stock option plan and for other corporate purposes. The Company
completed the repurchase of 800,000 shares of its
Class A Common Stock for $26.5 million in fiscal 2006.
On October 5, 2006, the Company entered into a
$200 million multi-currency revolving loan agreement with a
group of five banks that replaced the Companys previous
credit facility that had been entered into on March 31,
2004 and amended on January 19, 2006. At the Companys
option, and subject to certain standard conditions, the
available amount under the new credit facility may be increased
from $200 million up to $300 million. Under the new
5-year
agreement, which has a final maturity date of October 5,
2011, the Company has the option to select either a base
interest rate (based upon the higher of the federal funds rate
plus one-half of 1% or the prime rate of Bank of America) or a
Eurocurrency interest rate (at the LIBOR rate plus a margin
based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio). A
commitment fee is payable on the unused amount of the facility.
The agreement requires the Company to maintain two financial
covenants. As of July 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with the covenants of the agreement. The agreement
restricts the amount of certain types of payments, including
dividends, which can be made annually to $50 million plus
an amount equal to 75% of consolidated net income for the prior
fiscal year of the Company. The Company believes that based on
historic dividend practice, this restriction would not impede
the Company in following a similar dividend practice in the
future. During fiscal 2007 and 2006, the Company borrowed and
repaid $109.3 million and $415.7 million,
respectively. As of July 31, 2007, there were no
outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.
II-10
On March 23, 2007, the Company completed the private
placement of $150 million in ten-year fixed notes at 5.33%
interest to institutional investors. The notes will be amortized
in equal installments over seven years, beginning in 2011 with
interest payable on the notes semiannually on September 23 and
March 23, beginning in September 2007. The notes have been
fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by
the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The Company used the
net proceeds of the offering to reduce outstanding indebtedness
under the Companys revolving loan agreement and fund its
ongoing strategic growth plan. This private placement was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of
1933. The notes were not registered for resale and may not be
resold absent such registration or an applicable exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
applicable state securities laws. The notes have certain
prepayment penalties for repaying them prior to the maturity
date. The agreement also requires the Company to maintain a
financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with this covenant.
On February 14, 2006, the Company completed the private
placement of $200 million in ten-year fixed notes at 5.3%
interest to institutional investors. The notes will be amortized
in equal installments over seven years, beginning in 2010 with
interest payable on the notes semiannually on August 14 and
February 14, beginning in August 2006. The notes have been
fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by
the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The Company used the
net proceeds of the offering to finance acquisitions completed
in fiscal 2006 and 2007 and for general corporate purposes. This
private placement was exempt from the registration requirements
of the Securities Act of 1933. The notes were not registered for
resale and may not be resold absent such registration or an
applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities laws. The
notes have certain prepayment penalties for repaying them prior
to the maturity date. The agreement also requires the Company to
maintain a financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the
Company was in compliance with this covenant.
On June 30, 2004, the Company finalized a debt offering of
$150 million of 5.14% unsecured senior notes due in 2014 in
an offering exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933. The debt offering was in conjunction
with the Companys acquisition of EMED. The notes will be
amortized over seven years beginning in 2008, with interest
payable on the notes being due semiannually on June 28 and
December 28, beginning in December 2004. The Company used
the proceeds of the offering to reduce outstanding indebtedness
under the Companys revolving credit facilities used to
initially fund the EMED acquisition. The debt has certain
prepayment penalties for repaying the debt prior to its maturity
date. The agreement also requires the Company to maintain a
financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with this covenant.
Long-term obligations as a percentage of long-term obligations
plus stockholders investment were 34.9% at July 31,
2007, and 31.9% at July 31, 2006. Long-term obligations
increased by $128.6 million from July 31, 2006 to
July 31, 2007 due to the private placement that was
completed during the year, partially offset by the portion of
long-term obligations that is due for payment in fiscal 2008
that is recorded in current liabilities, and stockholders
investment increased $145.0 million during this period due
to net earnings for fiscal 2007 and changes in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
The Company intends to fund its short-term and long-term
operating cash requirements, including its fiscal 2008 dividend
payments, primarily through net cash provided by operating
activities.
The Company believes that its continued strong cash flows from
operations, existing borrowing capacity and continued access to
capital markets will enable it to execute its long-term
strategic plan. This strategic plan includes investments, which
expand its current market share, open new markets and
geographies, develop new products and distribution channels and
continue to improve our processes. This strategic plan also
includes executing key acquisitions.
Subsequent
Events Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources
On September 11, 2007, the Board of Directors announced an
increase in the quarterly dividend to shareholders of the
Companys Class A Common Stock, from $0.14 to $0.15
per share. The dividend will be paid on October 31, 2007,
to shareholders of record at the close of business on
October 10, 2007. This dividend represents an increase of
7% and is the 22nd consecutive annual increase in dividends
since the Company went public in 1984.
II-11
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have material off-balance sheet
arrangements or related party transactions. The Company is not
aware of factors that are reasonably likely to adversely affect
liquidity trends, other than the risks discussed in this filing
and presented in other Company filings. However, the following
additional information is provided to assist financial statement
users.
Operating Leases These leases generally are
entered into for investments in facilities such as manufacturing
facilities, warehouses and office space, computer equipment and
Company vehicles, when the economic profile is favorable.
Purchase Commitments The Company has purchase
commitments for materials, supplies, services, and property,
plant and equipment entered into in the ordinary course of
business. Such commitments are not in excess of current market
prices.
Due to the proprietary nature of many of the Companys
materials and processes, certain supply contracts contain
penalty provisions for early termination. The Company does not
believe a material amount of penalties will be incurred under
these contracts based upon historical experience and current
expectations.
Other Contractual Obligations The Company
does not have material financial guarantees or other contractual
commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect
liquidity other than those discussed below under Payments
Due Under Contractual Obligations.
Related Party Transactions The Company does
not have material related party transactions that affect the
results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
Payments
Due Under Contractual Obligations
The Companys future commitments at July 31, 2007, for
long-term debt, operating lease obligations, purchase
obligations, interest obligations and other obligations are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations
|
|
$
|
500,019
|
|
|
$
|
21,444
|
|
|
$
|
71,433
|
|
|
$
|
142,856
|
|
|
$
|
264,286
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
71,842
|
|
|
|
23,097
|
|
|
|
32,540
|
|
|
|
10,625
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
Purchase Obligations(1)
|
|
|
30,331
|
|
|
|
30,194
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Interest Obligations
|
|
|
150,405
|
|
|
|
26,305
|
|
|
|
49,306
|
|
|
|
39,215
|
|
|
|
35,579
|
|
Other Obligations(2)
|
|
|
10,517
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
763,114
|
|
|
$
|
101,615
|
|
|
$
|
154,819
|
|
|
$
|
194,500
|
|
|
$
|
312,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase obligations include all open purchase orders as of
July 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Other obligations represent expected payments under the
Companys postretirement medical, dental, and vision plans
as disclosed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, under Item 8 of this report. |
Inflation
and Changing Prices
Essentially all of the Companys revenue is derived from
the sale of its products in competitive markets. Because prices
are influenced by market conditions, it is not always possible
to fully recover cost increases through pricing. Changes in
product mix from year to year, timing differences in instituting
price changes and the large amount of part numbers make it
virtually impossible to accurately define the impact of
inflation on profit margins.
II-12
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which
requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting
and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are computed annually for differences between the
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based
on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which
the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense
is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus
the change during the period in deferred tax assets and
liabilities. Changes in existing regulatory tax laws and rates
may affect the Companys ability to manage successfully
regulatory matters around the world, and future business results
may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or the
valuation of deferred tax assets over time. The Companys
accounting for deferred tax consequences represents
managements best estimate of future events that can
appropriately be reflected in the accounting estimates. Although
the Companys current estimates may be subject to change in
the future, management does not believe such changes would
result in a material period-to-period impact on the results of
operations or the financial condition of the Company.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
The allocation of purchase price for business combinations
requires management estimates and judgment as to expectations
for future cash flows of the acquired business and the
allocation of those cash flows to identifiable intangible assets
in determining the estimated fair value for purchase price
allocation purposes. If the actual results differ from the
estimates and judgments used in these estimates, the amounts
recorded in the financial statements could result in a possible
impairment of the intangible assets and goodwill or require
acceleration of the amortization expense of finite-lived
intangible assets. In addition, SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires that
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested
annually for impairment. Changes in managements estimates
or judgments could result in an impairment charge, and such a
charge could have an adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition and results of operations. To aid in
establishing the value of goodwill and other intangible assets
at the time of acquisition, Company policy requires that all
acquisitions with a purchase price above $5 million must be
evaluated by a professional appraisal company.
Reserves
and Allowances
The Company has recorded reserves or allowances for inventory
obsolescence, uncollectible accounts receivable, returns, credit
memos, incurred but not reported medical claims, and income tax
contingencies. These reserves require the use of estimates and
judgment. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company believes that
such estimates are made with consistent and appropriate methods.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
New
Accounting Standards
The information required by this Item is provided in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Brady believes that certain statements in this
Form 10-K
are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
statements related to future, not past, events included in this
Form 10-K,
including, without limitation, statements regarding Bradys
future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected
sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and
cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future
operations are forward-looking statements. When used in this
Form 10-K,
words such as may, will,
expect, intend, estimate,
anticipate, believe, should,
project or plan or similar terminology
are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking
II-13
statements by their nature address matters that are, to
different degrees, uncertain and are subject to risks,
assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond
Bradys control, that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. For Brady, uncertainties arise from
future financial performance of major markets Brady serves,
which include, without limitation, telecommunications,
manufacturing, electrical, construction, laboratory, education,
governmental, public utility, computer, transportation;
difficulties in making and integrating acquisitions; risks
associated with newly acquired businesses; Bradys ability
to retain significant contracts and customers; future
competition; Bradys ability to develop and successfully
market new products; changes in the supply of, or price for,
parts and components; increased price pressure from suppliers
and customers; interruptions to sources of supply;
environmental, health and safety compliance costs and
liabilities; Bradys ability to realize cost savings from
operating initiatives; Bradys ability to attract and
retain key talent; difficulties associated with exports; risks
associated with international operations; fluctuations in
currency rates versus the US dollar; technology changes;
potential write-offs of Bradys substantial intangible
assets; risks associated with obtaining governmental approvals
and maintaining regulatory compliance for new and existing
products; business interruptions due to implementing business
systems; and numerous other matters of national, regional and
global scale, including those of a political, economic,
business, competitive and regulatory nature contained from time
to time in Bradys U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission filings, including, but not limited to, those factors
listed in the Risk Factors section located in
Item 1A of Part I of this
Form 10-K.
These uncertainties may cause Bradys actual future results
to be materially different than those expressed in its
forward-looking statements. Brady does not undertake to update
its forward-looking statements.
Risk
Factors
Please see the information contained in Item 1A
Risk Factors.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The Companys business operations give rise to market risk
exposure due to changes in foreign exchange rates. To manage
that risk effectively, the Company enters into hedging
transactions, according to established guidelines and policies,
that enable it to mitigate the adverse effects of this financial
market risk.
The global nature of the Companys business requires active
participation in the foreign exchange markets. As a result of
investments, production facilities and other operations on a
global scale, the Company has assets, liabilities and cash flows
in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. The primary
objective of the Companys foreign-currency exchange risk
management is to minimize the impact of currency movements on
intercompany transactions and foreign raw-material imports. To
achieve this objective, we hedge a portion of known exposures
using forward contracts. Main exposures are related to
transactions denominated in the British Pound, the Euro,
Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, Swedish Krona and Chinese
Yuan currency. In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we purchased
a currency option to hedge against increases in the purchase
price in U.S. dollar terms of Tradex, as the transaction
was denominated in the Swedish Krona. A gain of approximately
$1.5 million was recorded in fiscal 2006 due to this option.
The Company could be exposed to interest rate risk through its
corporate borrowing activities. The objective of the
Companys interest rate risk management activities is to
manage the levels of the Companys fixed and floating
interest rate exposure to be consistent with the Companys
preferred mix. The interest rate risk management program allows
the Company to enter into approved interest rate derivatives if
there is a desire to modify the Companys exposure to
interest rates. As of July 31, 2007, the Company had no
interest rate derivatives.
II-14
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
BRADY
CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
II-16
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-17
|
|
|
|
|
II-18
|
|
|
|
|
II-19
|
|
|
|
|
II-20
|
|
|
|
|
II-21
|
|
II-15
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Brady Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Brady Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of July 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders investment, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
July 31, 2007. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Brady Corporation and subsidiaries at July 31, 2007 and
2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended July 31,
2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2007, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
September 27, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Milwaukee, WI
September 27, 2007
II-16
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
July 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
142,846
|
|
|
$
|
113,008
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
19,200
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
for losses ($9,109 and $6,390, respectively)
|
|
|
239,569
|
|
|
|
187,907
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
80,486
|
|
|
|
59,365
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
37,983
|
|
|
|
37,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
|
139,778
|
|
|
|
109,917
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
42,020
|
|
|
|
36,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
583,413
|
|
|
|
459,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
737,450
|
|
|
|
587,642
|
|
Other intangibles assets
|
|
|
149,761
|
|
|
|
134,111
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
|
|
34,135
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,111
|
|
|
|
10,235
|
|
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
6,548
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
90,688
|
|
|
|
78,418
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
248,356
|
|
|
|
198,426
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
18,107
|
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,483
|
|
|
|
295,490
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
188,869
|
|
|
|
155,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
174,614
|
|
|
|
139,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,698,857
|
|
|
$
|
1,365,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
91,596
|
|
|
$
|
78,585
|
|
Wages and amounts withheld from
employees
|
|
|
73,622
|
|
|
|
61,778
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
8,461
|
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
25,243
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
60,254
|
|
|
|
46,763
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current
maturities on long-term obligations
|
|
|
21,444
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
280,054
|
|
|
|
218,620
|
|
Long-term obligations, less current
maturities
|
|
|
478,575
|
|
|
|
350,018
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
49,216
|
|
|
|
50,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
807,845
|
|
|
|
619,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting
Issued 50,586,524 and 50,481,743 shares, respectively
(aggregate liquidation preference of $42,240 and $42,152 at
July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively)
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
Class B Voting
Issued and outstanding 3,538,628 shares
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
266,203
|
|
|
|
258,922
|
|
Earnings retained in the business
|
|
|
540,238
|
|
|
|
460,991
|
|
Treasury stock 0 and
292,901 shares, respectively of Class A nonvoting
common stock, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,865
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
83,376
|
|
|
|
35,696
|
|
Other
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
891,012
|
|
|
|
746,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,698,857
|
|
|
$
|
1,365,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
II-17
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years
Ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
705,587
|
|
|
|
492,681
|
|
|
|
383,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
657,044
|
|
|
|
525,755
|
|
|
|
433,276
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
30,443
|
|
|
|
25,078
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
449,103
|
|
|
|
338,796
|
|
|
|
285,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
485,057
|
|
|
|
369,239
|
|
|
|
310,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
171,987
|
|
|
|
156,516
|
|
|
|
122,452
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other
income net
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,934
|
)
|
|
|
(14,231
|
)
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other expense
|
|
|
(20,059
|
)
|
|
|
(11,828
|
)
|
|
|
(7,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
151,928
|
|
|
|
144,688
|
|
|
|
115,418
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
42,540
|
|
|
|
40,513
|
|
|
|
33,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Voting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Class A and
Class B common shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
53,907
|
|
|
|
49,494
|
|
|
|
48,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
54,741
|
|
|
|
50,385
|
|
|
|
49,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted for two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock
dividend, effective December 31, 2004 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
II-18
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years
Ended JULY 31, 2007, 2006 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
in the
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
72,625
|
|
|
$
|
322,224
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,340
|
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
Net currency translation adjustment
and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
90,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 1,117,431 shares
of Class A Common Stock under stock option plan
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 16,030 shares of
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $.44 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $.42 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
99,029
|
|
|
$
|
382,880
|
|
|
$
|
(1,575
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
Net currency translation adjustment
and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 4,600,000 shares
of Class A Common Stock from equity offering
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
157,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 4,200 shares of
Class A Common Stock under stock option plan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(8,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of 800,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $.52 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $.50 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
258,922
|
|
|
$
|
460,991
|
|
|
$
|
(10,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,696
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
Net currency translation adjustment
and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 104,781 shares of
Class A Common Stock under stock option plan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options and deferred compensation distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to adopt
SFAS No. 158, net of tax of $1,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A $.56 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B $.54 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
266,203
|
|
|
$
|
540,238
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,376
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Adjusted for two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock
dividend, effective December 31, 2004.
II-19
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,856
|
|
|
|
35,144
|
|
|
|
26,822
|
|
Gain on foreign currency contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit from the
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts
receivable
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
Non-cash portion of stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
5,579
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities (net of effects of business acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(20,308
|
)
|
|
|
(13,620
|
)
|
|
|
(7,132
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(12,323
|
)
|
|
|
(16,961
|
)
|
|
|
(11,847
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(13,307
|
)
|
|
|
(2,163
|
)
|
|
|
(3,572
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
10,421
|
|
|
|
8,827
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(6,821
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
9,662
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7,198
|
|
|
|
(5,643
|
)
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
136,018
|
|
|
|
114,896
|
|
|
|
119,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of businesses, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(159,475
|
)
|
|
|
(351,331
|
)
|
|
|
(79,926
|
)
|
Payments of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(10,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(68,100
|
)
|
|
|
(150,900
|
)
|
|
|
(50,025
|
)
|
Sales of short-term investments
|
|
|
60,400
|
|
|
|
146,500
|
|
|
|
48,075
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(51,940
|
)
|
|
|
(39,410
|
)
|
|
|
(21,920
|
)
|
Net settlement of foreign currency
contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9,184
|
)
|
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(237,039
|
)
|
|
|
(395,282
|
)
|
|
|
(105,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(30,141
|
)
|
|
|
(26,064
|
)
|
|
|
(21,291
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
166,664
|
|
|
|
15,734
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(110,870
|
)
|
|
|
(417,601
|
)
|
|
|
(85,604
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
259,300
|
|
|
|
615,730
|
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,683
|
)
|
|
|
(1,551
|
)
|
Income tax benefit from the
exercise of stock options and deferred compensation distributions
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
129,421
|
|
|
|
318,958
|
|
|
|
(9,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
29,838
|
|
|
|
40,038
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year
|
|
|
113,008
|
|
|
|
72,970
|
|
|
|
68,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
year
|
|
$
|
142,846
|
|
|
$
|
113,008
|
|
|
$
|
72,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized
interest
|
|
$
|
19,842
|
|
|
$
|
8,991
|
|
|
$
|
7,836
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
|
49,233
|
|
|
|
37,661
|
|
|
|
19,358
|
|
Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired, net
of cash
|
|
$
|
87,398
|
|
|
$
|
167,900
|
|
|
$
|
60,193
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(33,248
|
)
|
|
|
(63,667
|
)
|
|
|
(35,113
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
105,325
|
|
|
|
247,098
|
|
|
|
54,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
159,475
|
|
|
$
|
351,331
|
|
|
$
|
79,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
II-20
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Nature of Operations Brady Corporation
(Brady or the Company) is an
international manufacturer and marketer of identification
solutions and specialty products which identify and protect
premises, products and people. Bradys core capabilities in
manufacturing, printing systems, precision engineering and
materials expertise make it a leading supplier to the
Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) market and
to the Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) market.
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brady
Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company), all
of which are wholly-owned, with the exception of one subsidiary
where a third party retains an insignificant investment. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Stock Dividend All previously presented
earnings per share, share amounts, and stock price data have
been adjusted for a two-for-one stock split in the form of a
100% stock dividend, effective December 31, 2004.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
Company believes the carrying amount of its financial
instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable) is a reasonable estimate of the fair value of
these instruments due to their short-term nature.
Cash Equivalents The Company considers all
highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or
less when acquired to be cash equivalents, which are recorded at
cost.
Available-for-Sale Securities The Company has
invested in certain marketable securities that are categorized
as available-for-sale. These investments consist of auction-rate
securities and have been classified as short-term investments
available-for-sale for all periods presented. The amount of
available-for-sale securities included in the consolidated
balance sheets as of July 31, 2007 and July 31, 2006
was $19,200 and $11,500, respectively, and consists solely of
auction rate securities.
The auction rate securities held by the Company are municipal
bonds with either perpetual or intermediate to long-term
maturities. The holding period of each bond is either 7, 28, 35,
or 49 days and is determined when the security is issued. A
Dutch auction takes place at the end of each holding period at
which time the security can be sold or held. The lowest rate
that sells all of the securities is the set rate for the
subsequent holding period. If there are not sufficient orders to
place all of the available securities, the auction is said to
have failed and liquidity will be denied for the
subsequent holding period.
The carrying value of the available-for-sale securities
approximates the aggregate fair value of the securities and
there are no unrealized gains or losses on the
available-for-sale securities. There were no realized gains or
losses on available-for-sales securities during the periods
presented.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined using the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for certain domestic
inventories (approximately 27% of total inventories at
July 31, 2007 and approximately 30% of total inventories at
July 31, 2006) and the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods for other
inventories. Had all domestic inventories been accounted for on
a FIFO basis instead of on a LIFO basis, the carrying value
would have increased by $8,228 and $8,863 at July 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
II-21
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Depreciation The cost of buildings and
improvements and machinery and equipment is being depreciated
over their estimated useful lives using primarily the
straight-line method for financial reporting purposes. The
estimated useful lives range from 3 to 33 years as shown
below.
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Range of Useful Lives
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
10 to 33 Years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 10 Years
|
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the
lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset.
Goodwill and other Intangible Assets The cost
of intangible assets with determinable useful lives is amortized
to reflect the pattern of economic benefits consumed on a
straight-line basis, over the estimated periods benefited.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and goodwill are
not subjected to amortization. These assets are assessed for
impairment annually and when deemed necessary.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended
July 31, 2007 and 2006, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
226,843
|
|
|
$
|
73,544
|
|
|
$
|
31,982
|
|
|
$
|
332,369
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
95,185
|
|
|
|
33,892
|
|
|
|
118,021
|
|
|
|
247,098
|
|
Adjustments for prior year
acquisitions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
4,697
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
8,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
322,759
|
|
|
$
|
111,792
|
|
|
$
|
153,091
|
|
|
$
|
587,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
76,944
|
|
|
|
26,696
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
105,325
|
|
Adjustments for prior year
acquisitions
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
21,405
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
10,206
|
|
|
|
10,662
|
|
|
|
23,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
404,074
|
|
|
$
|
163,699
|
|
|
$
|
169,677
|
|
|
$
|
737,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following acquisitions completed in fiscal 2007 increased
goodwill during the year ended July 31, 2007 by the
following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Comprehensive Identification
Products, Inc. (CIPI)
|
|
Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
|
|
$
|
20,451
|
|
Precision Converters, L.P.
(Precision Converters)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
9,665
|
|
Scafftag, Ltd., Safetrak, Ltd. and
Scafftag Pty., Ltd. (collectively Scafftag)
|
|
Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
7,030
|
|
Asterisco Artes Graficas Ltda.
(Asterisco)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
Modernotecnica SpA
(Moderno)
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
Clement Communications, Inc.
(Clement)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
12,960
|
|
Sorbent Products Co., Inc.
(SPC)
|
|
Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
35,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill also increased $21,405 during the year ended
July 31, 2007, as a result of adjustments to the allocation
of the purchase price for acquisitions completed in fiscal 2006
and the recording of $1,577 for the contingent payment due to
the previous owners of QDP Thailand Co., Ltd. (QDPT)
and $1,000 for the contingent payment due to the previous owners
of STOPware, Inc. (Stopware), which were both
acquired in fiscal 2006 (see Note 2 for more information).
The largest components of the increase were as a result of
adjustments to the
II-22
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
allocation of purchase price related to Tradex Converting AB
(Tradex) and Daewon Industry Corporation
(Daewon), which added $14,843 and $2,940,
respectively.
Of the $14,843 increase in goodwill related to the allocation of
the purchase price for Tradex, $6,788 of the increase was due to
the accrual for planned cost reduction activities contemplated
at the date of the acquisition. The accrual consists of $2,639
for severance and other employee termination costs, $2,885 for
contract termination and facility exit costs, and $1,264 for
changes in the valuation of fixed assets. As of July 31,
2007, the remaining liability from such charges was
approximately $2,702.
Of the $2,940 increase in goodwill related to the allocation of
the purchase price for Daewon, $1,829 of the increase was due to
the finalization and payment of the purchase price adjustment
owed to the former owners of Daewon and $1,013 of the increase
was due to the accrual for planned cost reduction activities
contemplated at the date of the acquisition. The accrual
consists of $289 for severance and other employee termination
costs, $277 for contract termination and facility exit costs,
and $447 for changes in the valuation of assets. As of
July 31, 2007, the remaining liability from such charges
was approximately $309.
The remaining $23,078 increase to goodwill during fiscal 2007
was attributable to the effects of foreign currency translation.
The following acquisitions completed in fiscal 2006 increased
goodwill during the year ended July 31, 2006 by the
following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Stopware
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
2,506
|
|
TruMed Technologies, Inc.
(TruMed)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
J.A.M. Plastics Inc.
(J.A.M.)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
Personnel Concepts
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
48,154
|
|
IDenticard Systems, Inc.
(IDenticard)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
25,192
|
|
Identicam Systems
(Identicam)
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
Texit Danmark AS and Texit Norge
AS (collectively Texit)
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
QDPT
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
Daewon
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
18,005
|
|
Accidental Health &
Safety Pty. Ltd. and Trafalgar First Aid Pty. Ltd. (collectively
Accidental Health)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
Carroll Australasia Pty. Ltd.
(Carroll)
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
Tradex
|
|
Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
106,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
247,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill also decreased $495 during the year ended July 31,
2006, as a result of adjustments to the allocation of the
purchase price of Signs and Labels Ltd. (Signs &
Labels), in Europe which was acquired on June 24,
2005 and to Technology Print Supplies, Ltd. and its associate,
Technology Supply Media Co., Ltd. (TPS) in Thailand,
which were acquired on July 29, 2005. The remaining $8,670
increase to goodwill during fiscal 2006 was attributable to the
effects of foreign currency translation.
II-23
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Other intangible assets include patents, trademarks, customer
relationships, purchased software, non-compete agreements and
other intangible assets with finite lives being amortized in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The net book value of these assets was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Period (Years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Period (Years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortized other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
8,392
|
|
|
$
|
(5,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
7,885
|
|
|
$
|
(5,134
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,751
|
|
Trademarks and other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
(3,250
|
)
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,328
|
|
|
|
(2,106
|
)
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
134,125
|
|
|
|
(36,674
|
)
|
|
|
97,451
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
109,955
|
|
|
|
(17,693
|
)
|
|
|
92,262
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11,364
|
|
|
|
(6,294
|
)
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9,757
|
|
|
|
(4,448
|
)
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
(1,887
|
)
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
Unamortized other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
42,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,758
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
31,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,446
|
|
|
$
|
(54,685
|
)
|
|
$
|
149,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
165,379
|
|
|
$
|
(31,268
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisitions completed in fiscal 2007 (see Note 2 for
more information) attributed to the increases in each of the
categories of other intangible assets listed above. The largest
components of the increase in customer relationships relates to
the acquisitions of CIPI, Precision Converters, Scafftag,
Asterisco, Moderno, Clement, and SPC which added $5,609, $1,415,
$2,767, $5,133, $5,913, $2,200 and $860, respectively. These
assets will be amortized over a weighted average amortization
period of 6.6 years. The increase in unamortized trademarks
primarily relates to the acquisitions of Scafftag, Clement and
SPC, which added $988, $1,000 and $8,998, respectively.
The value of goodwill and other intangible assets in the
consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2007 differs from
the value assigned to them in the allocation of purchase price
due to the effect of fluctuations in the exchange rates used to
translate financial statements into the United States Dollar
between the date of acquisition and July 31, 2007.
Amortization expense of intangible assets during fiscal 2007,
2006, and 2005 was $21,882, $13,633, and $7,935, respectively.
The amortization over each of the next five fiscal years is
projected to be $23,286, $22,423, $21,267, $17,906 and $8,996
for the years ending July 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and
2012, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Other Intangible
Assets The Company evaluates whether events and
circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining
estimated useful life of long-lived and other finite-lived
intangible assets may warrant revision or that the remaining
balance of an asset may not be recoverable. The measurement of
possible impairment is based on fair value of the assets
generally estimated by the ability to recover the balance of
assets from expected future operating cash flows on an
undiscounted basis. If an impairment is determined to exist, any
related impairment loss is calculated based on the fair value of
the asset. Based on the assessments completed in fiscal 2007,
there have been no indications of impairment in the
Companys long-lived and other intangible assets.
II-24
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Impairment of Goodwill The Company evaluates
goodwill under SFAS No. 142, which addresses the
financial accounting and reporting standards for the acquisition
of intangible assets outside of a business combination and for
goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their
acquisition. This accounting standard requires that goodwill not
be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment on at least
an annual basis.
The Company performed its annual assessments in the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year. The assessments included comparing
the carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, of each
reporting unit to its respective fair value as of the date of
the assessment. Fair value was estimated based upon discounted
cash flow analyses. Because the estimated fair value of each of
the Companys reporting units exceeded its carrying amount,
management believes that no impairment existed as of the date of
the latest assessment. No indications of impairment have been
identified between the date of the latest assessment and
July 31, 2007.
Catalog Costs Direct response catalog and
mailer costs are primarily capitalized and amortized over the
estimated useful lives of the publications (generally less than
one year). Non-direct response catalog costs are recorded as
prepaid supplies and recorded as advertising expense as they are
consumed (less than one year). At July 31, 2007 and 2006,
$15,292 and $14,331, respectively, of prepaid catalog costs were
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized
when it is both earned and realized or realizable. The
Companys policy is to recognize revenue when title to the
product, ownership and risk of loss have transferred to the
customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exits and
collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured, all of
which generally occur upon shipment of goods to customers. The
majority of the Companys revenue relates to the sale of
inventory to customers, and revenue is recognized when title and
the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer. Given
the nature of the Companys business and the applicable
rules guiding revenue recognition, the Companys revenue
recognition practices do not contain estimates that materially
affect the results of operations, with the exception of
estimated returns. The Company provides for an allowance for
estimated product returns, which is recognized as a deduction
from sales at the time of the sale.
Sales Incentives In accordance with the
Financial Accounting Standard Boards Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue (EITF)
No. 01-9,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer or a Reseller of the Vendors Product, the
Company accounts for cash consideration (such as sales
incentives and cash discounts) given to its customers or
resellers as a reduction of revenue rather than an operating
expense.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs The
Company accounts for shipping and handling fees and costs in
accordance with EITF Issue
No. 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.
Under EITF
No. 00-10
amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction related to
shipping costs are reported as net sales and the related costs
incurred for shipping are reported as cost of goods sold.
Advertising Costs Advertising costs are
expensed as incurred, except catalog costs as outlined above.
Advertising expense for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 were $75,452, $57,253 and $50,405, respectively.
Stock Based Compensation Effective
August 1, 2005, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Shared Based Payment. In
accordance with this standard, the Company recognizes the
compensation cost of all share-based awards using the grant-date
fair value of those awards (the fair-value-based
method). The expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period of the award. Total stock compensation
expense recognized by the Company during the years ended
July 31, 2007 and 2006 was $6,907 ($4,213 net of
taxes) and $5,568 ($3,396 net of taxes), respectively. As
of July 31, 2007, total unrecognized compensation cost
related to share-based compensation awards was $12,762, net of
estimated forfeitures, which the Company expects to recognize
over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
II-25
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition
method, compensation cost recognized during fiscal 2007 and 2006
included: (a) compensation costs for all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
August 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation cost for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to August 1, 2005,
based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Prior periods are
not restated under this method of adoption.
Prior to August 1, 2005, the Company accounted for employee
stock-based compensation under the intrinsic value method
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion
(APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees. Under APB No. 25, no employee stock
option based compensation expense was recorded in the income
statement prior to August 1, 2005 for the service-based
options. For performance-based options, the Company recorded
compensation expense for changes in the market value of the
underlying common stock under APB No. 25. The compensation
cost for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 included
expense for both performance stock options and restricted stock.
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost for
the stock option plans based on the fair value at the grant
dates for awards under those plans, consistent with the method
prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R), net income and net
income per common share for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2005 would have been changed to the pro-forma amounts indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
recorded, net of tax effect
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma expense, net of tax
effect
|
|
|
(3,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income, net of tax
effect
|
|
$
|
81,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Class A Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income per share
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income per share
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Class B Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income per share
|
|
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income per share
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-26
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The fair value of stock options used to compute pro-forma net
income and net income per common share disclosure is the
estimated present value at grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with weighted average assumptions and the
resulting estimated fair value for fiscal year 2005 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
4.5 years
|
|
Weighted average estimated fair
value at grant date
|
|
|
$7.04
|
|
The Company has estimated the fair value of its
performance-based and service-based option awards granted after
August 1, 2005 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The weighted-average assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes valuation model are reflected in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
Service-Based
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
Service-Based
|
|
Black-Scholes Option Valuation Assumptions
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
6.57
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
34.66
|
%
|
|
|
33.99
|
%
|
|
|
31.10
|
%
|
|
|
34.54
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
Weighted-average market value of
underlying stock at grant date
|
|
$
|
33.32
|
|
|
$
|
38.17
|
|
|
$
|
33.89
|
|
|
$
|
37.62
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price
|
|
$
|
33.32
|
|
|
$
|
38.17
|
|
|
$
|
33.89
|
|
|
$
|
37.62
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted
|
|
$
|
12.57
|
|
|
$
|
13.56
|
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
$
|
13.11
|
|
The Company uses historical data regarding stock option exercise
behaviors to estimate the expected term of options granted based
on the period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on the historical
volatility of the Companys stock. The expected dividend
yield is based on the Companys historical dividend
payments and historical yield. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the
grant date for the length of time corresponding to the expected
term of the option. The market value is obtained by taking the
average of the high and the low stock price on the date of grant.
In accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
the Company has classified the income tax benefit from the
exercise of stock options subsequent to adoption as a financing
cash inflow on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash
flows. Prior to this adoption, this tax benefit was recorded in
cash flows from operations.
Research and Development Amounts expended for
research and development are expensed as incurred.
Other comprehensive income Other
comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation
adjustments, net unrealized gains and losses from cash flow
hedges and other investments, the unamortized gain on the
post-retirement medical, dental and vision plan and their
related tax effects. The components of accumulated other
comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash
flow hedges and securities in deferred compensation plans, net
of tax of $93 and $35, respectively
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
Unamortized gain on
post-retirement medical, dental and vision plan, net of $1,551
tax
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
79,807
|
|
|
|
35,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
83,376
|
|
|
$
|
35,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-27
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Foreign Currency Translation Foreign currency
assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars
at end of period rates of exchange, and income and expense
accounts are translated at the weighted average rates of
exchange for the period. Resulting translation adjustments are
included in other comprehensive income.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income
taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an asset
and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for
income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
computed annually for differences between the financial
statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will
result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on
enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which
the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense
is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus
the change during the period in deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
Risk Management Activities The Company is
exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates and
currency exchange rates. The Company does not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Currency Rate Hedging The primary objectives
of the foreign exchange risk management activities are to
understand and mitigate the impact of potential foreign exchange
fluctuations on the Companys financial results and its
economic well-being. While the Companys risk management
objectives and strategies will be driven from an economic
perspective, the Company will attempt, where possible and
practical, to ensure that the hedging strategies it engages in
can be treated as hedges from an accounting
perspective or otherwise result in accounting treatment where
the earnings effect of the hedging instrument provides
substantial offset (in the same period) to the earnings effect
of the hedged item. Generally, these risk management
transactions will involve the use of foreign currency
derivatives to protect against exposure resulting from
intercompany sales and identified inventory or other asset
purchases.
The Company primarily utilizes forward exchange contracts with
maturities of less than 12 months, which qualify as cash
flow hedges. These are intended to offset the effect of exchange
rate fluctuations on forecasted sales, inventory purchases and
intercompany charges. The fair value of these instruments at
July 31, 2007 and 2006 was $(421) and $(355), respectively.
Hedge effectiveness is determined by how closely the changes in
the fair value of the hedging instrument offset the changes in
the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge
accounting is permitted only if the hedging relationship is
expected to be highly effective at the inception of the hedge
and on an on-going basis. Any ineffective portions are to be
recognized in earnings immediately as a component of investment
and other income. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not
significant for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005.
New Accounting Standards In June 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This
interpretation establishes a threshold condition that a tax
position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position
to be recognized in the financial statements. This
Interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Company is in the process of completing the process of
evaluating the impact that will result from adopting FIN 48
and therefore is unable to disclose the impact that adopting
FIN 48 will have on its financial position and results of
operations when such statement is adopted.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. This statement provides
guidance on how to measure the fair value of assets and
liabilities utilizing a fair value hierarchy to classify the
sources of information used in the measurement calculation.
SFAS No. 157 also provides new disclosure rules for
assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their
level in the fair value hierarchy. This new statement will
II-28
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact
that will result from adopting SFAS No. 157 and therefore
is unable to disclose the impact from adopting SFAS No. 157
will have on its financial position and results of operations
when such statement is adopted.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. This statement permits entities to choose to
use the fair value option to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to
improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting. This new statement
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact that will result from adopting SFAS
No. 159 and therefore is unable to disclose the impact from
adopting SFAS No. 159 will have on its financial position
and results of operations when such statement is adopted.
|
|
2.
|
Acquisitions
of Businesses
|
The Company completed seven business acquisitions during the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, eleven business
acquisitions during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 and
four acquisitions during the fiscal year ended July 31,
2005. All of these transactions were accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting; therefore, the results of
operations are included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements only since their acquisition dates. The
Company is continuing to evaluate the initial purchase price
allocations for the acquisitions completed during the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2007, and will adjust the allocations
as additional information relative to the fair values of assets
and liabilities of the acquired businesses become known.
Fiscal
2007
The Company acquired the following companies in fiscal 2007 for
a total combined purchase price, net of cash acquired, of
$159,475. A brief description of each company acquired during
the year is included below:
|
|
|
|
|
CIPI is headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, with
operations in Hong Kong, China and the Netherlands. CIPI is a
market leader in badging accessories used to identify and track
employees and visitors in a variety of settings including
businesses, healthcare facilities, special events and government
buildings. CIPI was acquired in August 2006.
|
|
|
|
Precision Converters is located in Dallas, Texas and is a
supplier of die-cut products to the medical market with a
specific focus on disposable, advanced wound-care products.
Precision Converters was acquired in October 2006.
|
|
|
|
Scafftag is located in Barry, Wales, U.K., with operations in
Australia and in the United States and a sales office in the
United Arab Emirates. Scafftag is an industry leader in safety
identification and facility management products in the U.K.,
specializing in products that help companies meet legislative
requirements for safety standards in the oil and gas,
construction and scaffolding industries. Scafftag was
acquired in December 2006.
|
|
|
|
Asterisco is located in Sao Paulo, Brazil and is a leading
manufacturer of industrial high-performance labels in Brazil,
specializing in custom labels printed on film materials for the
electronics, automotive, pharmaceutical and other industries.
Asterisco was acquired in December 2006.
|
|
|
|
Moderno is located in Milan, Italy and is a wire-identification
manufacturer serving the Maintenance, Repair and Operations
market with products used primarily in the electrical industry.
Moderno was acquired in December 2006.
|
II-29
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Clement is located in Concordville, Pennsylvania and is a direct
marketer of posters, newsletters, guides and handbooks that
address safety, quality, teamwork, sales employment practices,
customer service and OSHA regulations. Clement was acquired in
February 2007.
|
|
|
|
SPC is headquartered in Somerset, New Jersey, with operations in
Belgium and Hong Kong. SPC is a leading manufacturer and
marketer of synthetic sorbent materials used in a variety of
industrial maintenance and environmental applications for spill
clean-up,
containment and control. SPC was acquired in April 2007.
|
The purchase agreements for Scafftag and Asterisco each include
provisions for contingent payments based upon meeting certain
performance conditions over a period of time subsequent to the
acquisition. The total maximum contingent payments of
$5.2 million have not been accrued as liabilities on the
accompanying consolidated financial statements as the payments
are based on attaining certain financial results which have not
been achieved as of July 31, 2007. Approximately
$4.9 million of the contingency related to the Asterisco
acquisition has been placed in an escrow account in compliance
with the terms of the purchase agreement. This cash outflow has
been recorded in other long-term assets on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of July 31, 2007 and in
other investing activities on the accompanying consolidated
statements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2007. The purchase agreement of Asterisco also includes a
holdback provision of approximately $2.3 million that has
been recorded as a liability in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements at July 31, 2007.
The allocation of the purchase price of each company acquired
during fiscal 2007 is preliminary pending the final valuation of
intangible assets as well as certain tangible assets and
liabilities. The following table summarizes the combined
estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
38,148
|
|
Property, plant &
equipment
|
|
|
12,158
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
105,325
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
23,897
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
11,232
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
967
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
192,723
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
33,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
159,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $105,325 allocated to goodwill, $72,134 is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes based on preliminary analysis.
The fiscal 2007 acquisitions were determined to be immaterial
individually and in the aggregate, so no pro forma disclosures
were required.
Fiscal
2006
The Company acquired the following companies in fiscal 2006 for
a total combined purchase price, net of cash acquired, of
$351,331. A brief description of each company acquired during
the year is included below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stopware is located in San Jose, California and is a
manufacturer of visitor-badging and lobby-security software used
to identify and track visitors. Stopware was acquired in August
2005.
|
|
|
|
Texit is a manufacturer and distributor of wire markers and
cable-management products headquartered in Odense, Denmark, with
operations in Alesund, Norway. Texit was acquired in September
2005.
|
II-30
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
TruMed is a converter of disposable products and components for
manufacturers in the medical device, diagnostic, personal care
and industrial markets and is located in Burnsville, Minnesota.
TruMed was acquired in October 2005.
|
|
|
|
QDPT was formerly located in Wangnoi, Ayutthaya, Thailand and
designs and manufactures high-precision components for the
electronic, medical and automotive industries, specializing in
precision laminating, stamping and contract assembly. QDPT was
acquired in October 2005. In fiscal 2007, QDPT combined its
operations with TPS in a facility in Klongluang, Pathumthani,
Thailand.
|
|
|
|
J.A.M. was formerly located in Anaheim, California and
specializes in the sale and manufacture of security-related
accessory products including patented badge holders, lanyards
and retractable badge reels. J.A.M. was acquired in December
2005. In fiscal 2007, the operations of J.A.M. were merged with
CIPI.
|
|
|
|
Personnel Concepts is located in Pomona, California and is a
direct marketer of labor-law compliance posters and related
products. Personnel Concepts also offers consultative expertise
on required communication of federal and state minimum wages,
HIPAA privacy regulations, and EEO compliance, among other
regulatory areas. Personnel Concepts was acquired in January
2006.
|
|
|
|
IDenticard is located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania and its
affiliate Identicam is located in Markham, Ontario. The
companies are market leaders in personal identification, access
control and consumable identification badges. IDenticard and
Identicam were acquired in February 2006.
|
|
|
|
Accidental Health was formerly located in Glendenning, New South
Wales, Australia and is a supplier and distributor of customized
first-aid kits, related safety products and signage for
commercial enterprises. Accidental Health was acquired in March
2006. In fiscal 2007, Accidental Health combined its operations
with Brady Australia Pty. Ltd. in Sydney, Australia.
|
|
|
|
Tradex is headquarterd in Kungalv, Sweden with operations in
Sweden, China, Korea, Mexico, the United States, Brazil, and
Taiwan. Tradex is a leading manufacturer and supplier of
pressure sensitive, die-cut adhesive components for the mobile
handset and electronics industries. Tradex was acquired in May
2006. In fiscal 2007, the operations in Suzhou, China were
closed.
|
|
|
|
Carroll is located in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia and is
a supplier and distributor of identification products for the
electrical industry, with a complete line of wiring accessory
products including prepared wire and cable markers, termination
and connection supplies, wire-bundling materials and electrical
circuit protection products. Carroll also markets to the
automotive and marine markets. Carroll was acquired in June 2006.
|
|
|
|
Daewon is based in Seoul, South Korea with additional operations
in Gumi, South Korea and former operations in Suzhou, China.
Daewon is a manufacturer and supplier of pressure sensitive,
die-cut adhesive components for the mobile handset and
electronics industry and was acquired in July 2006. In fiscal
2007, the operations in Suzhou, China were closed.
|
II-31
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following table summarizes the combined estimated fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
date of the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
72,882
|
|
Property, plant &
equipment
|
|
|
22,159
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
247,098
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
56,538
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
Purchased software
|
|
|
378
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
610
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
414,998
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
63,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
351,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $247,098 allocated to goodwill, $26,209 is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes based on preliminary analysis.
The purchase agreements for Texit, QDPT, and Stopware each
included provisions for contingent payments based upon meeting
certain performance conditions over a period of time subsequent
to the acquisition. In fiscal 2006 and 2007, $1,800 and $2,577,
respectively, of the conditions were met and recorded in
goodwill. Payments of $3,377 were made during fiscal 2007 to
satisfy the contingent payment requirements. The remaining
$1,000 liability will be paid in fiscal 2008. The purchase
agreements for QDPT, Stopware and Daewon included holdback
provisions of $310, $200 and $4,350, respectively. The holdback
provision for QDPT was paid in fiscal 2007 and $4,550 remains as
a liability in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for Stopware and Daewon as of July 31, 2007. The
holdback provision for Stopware was paid in August 2007.
II-32
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations of the
Company for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, give effect to all acquisitions completed since
August 1, 2005 as listed above as though the transactions
had occurred on August 1, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
1,189,545
|
|
|
|
1,040,327
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
105,883
|
|
|
|
84,171
|
|
Per Class A Nonvoting Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
Per Class B Voting Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
These unaudited pro-forma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and primarily include adjustments for
amortization arising from the valuation of intangible assets,
interest expense on debt issued in connection with the
acquisitions, and the related income tax adjustments. The
pro-forma information is not necessarily indicative of the
results that would have occurred had the acquisitions occurred
at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future results.
Fiscal
2005
In August 2004, the Company acquired ID Technologies, a
Singapore based manufacturer and supplier of pressure sensitive
die-cut components and labeling products. The purchase price was
approximately $42,800 in cash and included a holdback amount of
$6,500, which was paid in August 2006. The holdback is recorded
in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets at July 31, 2006. Interest was imputed on the
holdback at a rate of 4.9% per year. The agreement also provided
for a contingent payment of no more than $2,500 if ID
Technologies met certain financial targets for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2005. As of July 31, 2005, the
financial targets had been met and the corresponding liability
was reflected in the consolidated financial statements at the
maximum payment amount and was paid to the sellers in fiscal
2006. Of the purchase price, $25,926 was assigned to goodwill
and $16,017 was assigned to other intangible assets in the
purchase price allocation. The allocation of these intangible
assets included approximately $13,500 for customer
relationships, $2,300 for non-compete agreements, and $217 of
other intangible assets. There is no remaining goodwill expected
to be deductible for tax purposes.
II-33
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In February 2005, the Company acquired Electromark, a
manufacturer and supplier of safety and facility identification
products to the utility industry, headquartered in Wolcott, New
York. The purchase price was approximately $15,100 in cash. Of
the purchase price, a total of $3,509 was assigned to intangible
assets other than goodwill and $8,344 was assigned to goodwill
in the purchase price allocation. The intangible assets consist
of approximately $1,300 of customer relationships, $1,600 of
trademarks, and $609 of other intangible assets at the time of
acquisition. Remaining tax goodwill of $48 is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
In June 2005, the Company acquired Signs & Labels, a
provider of stock and custom signage, custom safety signs,
architectural signs and modular signage systems for business
offices, schools and hospitals in the United Kingdom. The
purchase price was approximately $24,000 in cash. Of the
purchase price, a total of $10,955 was assigned to intangible
assets other than goodwill and $18,039 was assigned to goodwill
in the allocation of the purchase price. The intangible assets
identified in the allocation of the purchase price consist of
approximately $6,109 of customer relationships, $4,554 of
trademarks, and $292 of non-compete and other. Immediately
following the acquisition, all outstanding debt of
Signs & Labels, approximately $2,500, was repaid with
cash. There is no remaining goodwill expected to be deductible
for tax purposes.
In July 2005, the Company acquired TPS, a manufacturer and
supplier of pressure sensitive labels, nameplates and tags in
Thailand. The purchase price was approximately $5,250 in cash.
Of the purchase price, a total of $2,755 was assigned to
intangible assets other than goodwill and $2,090 was assigned to
goodwill in the allocation of the purchase price. Of the cash
purchase price, a portion was being withheld until legal
ownership of the facility owned by TPS was transferred to Brady
Corporation. This transfer was completed in fiscal 2006. The
intangible assets identified in the allocation of the purchase
price include approximately $1,975 of customer relationships and
$780 of non-compete agreements and other. Remaining tax goodwill
of $2,506 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes based on
the allocation of the purchase price.
|
|
3.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Company provides postretirement medical, dental and vision
benefits (the Plan) for all regular full and
part-time domestic employees (including spouses) who retire on
or after attainment of age 55 with 15 years of
credited service. Credited service begins accruing at the later
of age 40 or date of hire. All active employees first
eligible to retire after July 31, 1992, are covered by an
unfunded, contributory postretirement healthcare plan where
employer contributions will not exceed a defined dollar benefit
amount, regardless of the cost of the program. Employer
contributions to the plan are based on the employees age
and service at retirement. The Company funds benefit costs on a
pay-as-you-go basis.
In October 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans. This statement requires full
recognition of the funded status of defined benefit and other
postretirement plans on the balance sheet as an asset or a
liability. SFAS No. 158 also continues to require that
unrecognized prior service costs/credits, gains/losses, and
transition obligations/assets be recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income, thus not changing the income statement
recognition rules for such plans. The Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 158 for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007.
II-34
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The incremental effects of the initial application of
SFAS No. 158 to the consolidated balance at
July 31, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Application
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Application
|
|
|
|
of SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
of SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
34,059
|
|
|
$
|
(1,551
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,508
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,700,408
|
|
|
|
(1,551
|
)
|
|
|
1,698,857
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
60,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,254
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
280,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,054
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
54,191
|
|
|
|
(4,975
|
)
|
|
|
49,216
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
812,820
|
|
|
|
(4,975
|
)
|
|
|
807,845
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
79,952
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
83,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
$
|
887,588
|
|
|
$
|
3,424
|
|
|
$
|
891,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had no effect on the
Companys net earnings.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in
the Plans accumulated benefit obligations during the years
ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
12,650
|
|
|
$
|
10,909
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(2,097
|
)
|
|
|
723
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation at end of fiscal year
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
|
$
|
12,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table outlines the unfunded status of the Plan
recorded as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets as of July 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Unfunded status at July 31
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
|
$
|
12,650
|
|
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
Unrecognized prior service gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation (APBO) liability
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
|
$
|
15,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2007 and 2006, amounts recognized as
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Noncurrent liability
|
|
|
11,130
|
|
|
|
15,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
|
$
|
15,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-35
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
As of July 31, 2007 and 2006, pre-tax amounts recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain
|
|
$
|
(4,698
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,975
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost for the Plan for fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005 includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement
benefit cost included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits
attributed to service during the period
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized gain
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic postretirement benefit
cost
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
1,664
|
|
|
$
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated actuarial gain and prior service credit that will
be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into
net periodic postretirement benefit cost over the next fiscal
year are $303 and $33, respectively.
The following assumptions were used in accounting for the plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
used in determining accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation Liability
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Weighted average discount rate
used in determining net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Assumed health care trend rate
used to measure APBO at July 31
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Rate to which cost trend rate is
assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Fiscal year the ultimate trend
rate is reached
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the Plan. A one-percentage point
change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the
following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Percentage
|
|
One-Percentage
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
Effect on future service and
interest cost
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Effect on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation at July 31, 2007
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
644
|
|
II-36
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid during the
years ending July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Impact of
|
|
|
|
Medicare Part D
|
|
|
Medicare Part D
|
|
|
Medicare Part D
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
2009
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
2010
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
2011
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
2012
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
2013 through 2017
|
|
|
8,031
|
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
In December 2003, the United States enacted into law the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 (the Act). The Act establishes a prescription
drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well
as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit
plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D.
In May 2004, the FASB issued
FSP 106-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003.
FSP 106-2
requires companies to account for the effect of the subsidy on
benefits attributable to past service as an actuarial experience
gain and as a reduction of the service cost component of net
postretirement health care costs for amounts attributable to
current service, if the benefit provided is at least actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D.
The Company adopted
FSP 106-2
effective with the fiscal year beginning August 1, 2004.
The Company determined that benefits provided to certain
participants are expected to be at least actuarially equivalent
to Medicare Part D, and, accordingly, the Company will be
entitled to a subsidy. The expected subsidy reduced net periodic
cost for the years ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 by $522 and
$409, respectively, as compared with the amount calculated
without considering the effects of the subsidy.
Assumptions used to develop these reductions include those used
in the determination of the annual expense under
SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits other than Pensions, as amended by
SFAS No. 158, and also include expectations of how the
federal program would ultimately operate.
The Company has retirement and profit-sharing plans covering
substantially all full-time domestic employees and certain of
its foreign subsidiaries. Contributions to the plans are
determined annually or quarterly, according to the respective
plans, based on earnings of the respective companies and
employee contributions. At July 31, 2007 and 2006, $6,590
and $5,928, respectively, of accrued profit-sharing
contributions were included in other current liabilities and
other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
The Company also has deferred compensation plans for directors,
officers and key executives which are discussed below. At
July 31, 2007 and 2006, $10,147 and $7,853, respectively,
of deferred compensation was included in current and other
long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
During fiscal 1998, the Company adopted a new deferred
compensation plan that invests solely in shares of the
Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. Participants
in a predecessor phantom stock plan were allowed to convert
their balances in the old plan to this new plan. The new plan
was funded initially by the issuance of shares of Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock to a Rabbi Trust. All deferrals into the
new plan result in purchases of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock by the Rabbi Trust. No deferrals are allowed into a
predecessor plan. Shares held by the Rabbi Trust are distributed
to participants upon separation from the Company as defined in
the plan agreement.
During fiscal 2002, the Company adopted a new deferred
compensation plan that allows future contributions to be
invested in shares of the Companys Class A Nonvoting
Common Stock or in certain other investment vehicles. Prior
deferred compensation deferrals must remain in the
Companys Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. All
II-37
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
participant deferrals into the new plan result in purchases of
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock or certain other investment
vehicles by the Rabbi Trust. Balances held by the Rabbi Trust
are distributed to participants upon separation from the Company
as defined in the plan agreement. On May 1, 2006, the plan
was amended to require that deferrals into Brady stock must
remain in Brady stock and be distributed in shares of Brady
stock.
The amounts charged to expense for the retirement, profit
sharing and deferred compensation plans described above were
$14,990, $9,862 and $10,980 during the years ended July 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Income
taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Currently payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
5,439
|
|
|
$
|
14,201
|
|
|
$
|
10,002
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
34,835
|
|
|
|
26,143
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
State
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,610
|
|
|
|
42,356
|
|
|
|
36,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(4,151
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,540
|
|
|
$
|
40,513
|
|
|
$
|
33,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the
recognition of revenues and expenses for financial statement and
income tax purposes.
Income
before income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
67,448
|
|
|
$
|
46,790
|
|
|
$
|
36,985
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
84,480
|
|
|
|
97,898
|
|
|
|
78,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
151,928
|
|
|
$
|
144,688
|
|
|
$
|
115,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-38
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The approximate tax effects of temporary differences are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
6,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,289
|
|
Prepaid catalog costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,785
|
)
|
|
|
(1,785
|
)
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
|
|
(1,785
|
)
|
|
|
9,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,777
|
)
|
|
|
(3,777
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
|
(19,629
|
)
|
|
|
(11,459
|
)
|
Capitalized R&D expenditures
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
13,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,799
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
6,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,630
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(19,687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,687
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
37,504
|
|
|
|
(25,304
|
)
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,901
|
|
|
$
|
(27,089
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,058
|
|
Prepaid catalog costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,196
|
)
|
|
|
(2,196
|
)
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
11,788
|
|
|
|
(2,196
|
)
|
|
|
9,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
12,917
|
|
|
|
(20,232
|
)
|
|
|
(7,315
|
)
|
Capital R&D expenditures
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
13,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,446
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
17,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,300
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(15,668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,668
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
38,909
|
|
|
|
(24,532
|
)
|
|
|
14,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,697
|
|
|
$
|
(26,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance increased $4,019 and $10,791 during the
fiscal years ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively and
decreased $657 during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005.
II-39
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Tax loss carry forwards at July 31, 2007 are comprised of
foreign net operating losses of approximately $84,517, of which
$67,946 have no expiration date. The remaining balance relates
to state net operating losses of $45,350 and state credits of
$1,683. The Company expects to utilize all credits; however,
state net operating losses will begin to expire in the fiscal
year ending July 31, 2008.
Rate
Reconciliation
A reconciliation of the tax computed by applying the statutory
U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes
to the total income tax provision is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of Federal
tax benefit
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
International rate differential
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
Rate variances arising from
foreign subsidiary distributions
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
Resolution of prior period tax
matters
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unremitted
Earnings
The Companys policy is to remit earnings from foreign
subsidiaries only to the extent any resultant foreign income
taxes are creditable in the United States. Accordingly, the
Company does not currently provide for the additional United
States and foreign income taxes which would become payable upon
remission of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
The cumulative undistributed earnings of such subsidiaries at
July 31, 2007 amounted to approximately $282,076.
On March 23, 2007, the Company completed the private
placement of $150 million in ten-year fixed notes at 5.33%
interest to institutional investors. The notes will be amortized
in equal installments over seven years, beginning in 2011, with
interest payable on the notes semiannually on September 23 and
March 23, beginning in September 2007. The notes have been
fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by
the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The Company used the
net proceeds of the offering to reduce outstanding indebtedness
under the Companys revolving loan agreement and fund its
ongoing strategic growth plan. The private placement was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of
1933. The notes were not registered for resale and may not be
resold absent such registration or an applicable exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
applicable state securities laws. The notes have certain
prepayment penalties for repaying them prior to the maturity
date. The agreement also requires the Company to maintain a
financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with this covenant.
On October 5, 2006, the Company entered into a
$200 million multi-currency revolving loan agreement with a
group of five banks that replaced the Companys previous
credit facility that had been entered into on March 31,
2004 and amended on January 19, 2006. At the Companys
option, and subject to certain standard conditions, the
available amount under the new credit facility may be increased
from $200 million up to $300 million. Under the new
5-year
agreement, which has a final maturity date of October 5,
2011, the Company has the option to select either a base
interest rate (based upon the higher of the federal funds rate
plus one-half of 1% or the prime rate of Bank of America) or a
Eurocurrency interest rate (at the LIBOR rate plus a margin
based on the Companys
II-40
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
consolidated leverage ratio). A commitment fee is payable on the
unused amount of the facility. The agreement requires the
Company to maintain two financial covenants. As of July 31,
2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the
agreement. The agreement restricts the amount of certain types
of payments, including dividends, which can be made annually to
$50 million plus an amount equal to 75% of consolidated net
income for the prior fiscal year of the Company. The Company
believes that based on historic dividend practice, this
restriction would not impede the Company in following a similar
dividend practice in the future. As of July 31, 2007, there
were no outstanding borrowings under credit facility.
On February 14, 2006, the Company completed the private
placement of $200 million in ten-year fixed notes at 5.3%
interest to institutional investors. The notes will be amortized
in equal installments over seven years, beginning in 2010 with
interest payable on the notes semiannually on August 14 and
February 14, beginning in August 2006. The notes have been
fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by
the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The Company used the
net proceeds of the offering to finance acquisitions completed
in fiscal 2006 and 2007. This private placement was exempt from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The
notes were not registered for resale and may not be resold
absent such registration or an applicable exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
applicable state securities laws. The notes have certain
prepayment penalties for repaying them prior to the maturity
date. The agreement also requires the Company to maintain a
financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the Company was in
compliance with this covenant.
On June 30, 2004, the Company finalized a debt offering of
$150 million of 5.14% fixed rate unsecured senior notes due
in 2014 in an offering exempt from the registration requirements
of the Securities Act of 1933. The debt offering was in
conjunction with the Companys acquisition of EMED. The
notes will be repaid over 7 years beginning in 2008 with
interest payable on the notes semiannually on June 28 and
December 28 beginning in December 2004. The Company used the
proceeds of the offering to reduce outstanding indebtedness
under the Companys revolving credit facilities. The debt
has certain prepayment penalties for repaying the debt prior to
its maturity date. The agreement also requires the Company to
maintain a financial covenant. As of July 31, 2007, the
Company was in compliance with this covenant.
Long-term obligations consist of the following as of July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Various bank loans
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
Fixed debt
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,019
|
|
|
|
350,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
$
|
(21,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
478,575
|
|
|
$
|
350,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys long-term obligations
approximates $488,780. The fair value of the Companys
long-term obligations is estimated based on quoted market prices
for the same or similar issue and on the current rates offered
for debt of the same maturities.
II-41
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Maturities on long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
21,444
|
|
2009
|
|
|
21,433
|
|
2010
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
71,428
|
|
2012
|
|
|
71,428
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
264,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
500,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $1,680 and
$2,887 at July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
6.
|
Stockholders
Investment
|
Information as to the Companys capital stock at
July 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par
value
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% Cumulative
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1972 Series
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1979 Series
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
50,586,524
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
50,481,743
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
Class B Voting
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,538,628
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,538,628
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before any dividend may be paid on the Class B Common
Stock, holders of the Class A Common Stock are entitled to
receive an annual, noncumulative cash dividend of $.01665 per
share. Thereafter, any further dividend in that fiscal year must
be paid on each share of Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock on an equal basis.
Other than as required by law, holders of the Class A
Common Stock are not entitled to any vote on corporate matters,
unless, in each of the three preceding fiscal years, the $.01665
preferential dividend described above has not been paid in full.
Holders of the Class A Common Stock are entitled to one
vote per share for the entire fiscal year immediately following
the third consecutive fiscal year in which the preferential
dividend is not paid in full. Holders of Class B Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share for the election of
directors and for all other purposes.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and
after distribution of any amounts due to holders of Cumulative
Preferred Stock, holders of the Class A Common Stock are
entitled to receive the sum of $0.835 per share before any
payment or distribution to holders of the Class B Common
Stock. Thereafter, holders of the Class B Common Stock are
entitled to receive a payment or distribution of $0.835 per
share. Thereafter, holders of the Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock share equally in all payments or
distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the
Company.
II-42
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The preferences in dividends and liquidation rights of the
Class A Common Stock over the Class B Common Stock
will terminate at any time that the voting rights of
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock become
equal.
In September 2005, the Company announced that the Board of
Directors of the Company approved a share repurchase program for
up to 800,000 shares of the Companys Class A
Common Stock during fiscal 2006. The share repurchase plan was
implemented by purchasing shares on the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions, with repurchased shares
available for use in connection with the Companys stock
option plan and for other corporate purposes. The Company
completed the repurchase of all 800,000 shares of its
Class A Common Stock for $26,495 under the repurchase plan
approved by the Board of Directors during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2006.
In June 2006, the Company sold, pursuant to an underwritten
public offering, 4,600,000 shares of its Class A
nonvoting common stock at a price of $36 per share. Cash
proceeds from the offering, net of underwriting discounts, were
$158,148. In addition to underwriting discounts, the Company
incurred $403 of additional accounting, legal and other expenses
related to the offering that were charged to additional paid-in
capital. The proceeds were used to fund acquisitions completed
in fiscal 2006 and early fiscal 2007.
The following is a summary of other activity in
stockholders investment for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
in Rabbi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Trust, at cost
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances July 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,194
|
|
|
$
|
(15,194
|
)
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
988,534
|
|
|
|
988,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Purchase of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
Amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances July 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
14,775
|
|
|
$
|
(15,825
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,222
|
|
|
|
997,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Purchase of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Effect of plan amendment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
17,602
|
|
|
$
|
(16,840
|
)
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,012,914
|
|
|
|
1,012,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,242
|
)
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Purchase of shares at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
13,575
|
|
|
$
|
(12,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at July 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724,417
|
|
|
|
724,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to 2002, all Brady Corporation deferred compensation was
invested in Brady stock. In 2002, the Company adopted a new
deferred compensation plan which allowed investing in other
investment funds in addition to Brady stock. Under this plan,
participants were allowed to transfer funds between Brady stock
and the other investment funds. On May 1, 2006 the plan was
amended with the provision that deferrals into Brady stock must
II-43
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
remain in Brady stock and be distributed in shares of Brady
stock. At July 31, 2007, the deferred compensation balance
in stockholders investment represents the investment at
the original cost of shares held in Brady stock for the deferred
compensation plan prior to 2002 and the investment at the cost
of shares held in Brady stock for the plan subsequent to 2002,
adjusted for the plan amendment on May 1, 2006. The balance
of shares held in the Rabbi Trust represents the investment in
Brady stock at the original cost of all Brady stock held in
deferred compensation plans.
The Companys Employee Monthly Stock Investment Plan
(the Plan) provides that eligible employees may
authorize a fixed dollar amount between $20 and $500 per month
to be deducted from their pay. The funds deducted are forwarded
to the Plan administrator and are used to purchase Brady stock
at the market price. As part of the Plan, Brady pays all
brokerage fees for stock purchases and dividend reinvestments.
The Company has an incentive stock plan under which the Board of
Directors may grant nonqualified stock options to purchase
shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to employees.
Additionally, the Company has a nonqualified stock option plan
for non-employee directors under which stock options to purchase
shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock are available for
grant. The options have an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant and
generally vest ratably over a three-year period, with one-third
becoming exercisable one year after the grant date and one-third
additional in each of the succeeding two years. Options issued
under these plans, referred to herein as
service-based options, generally expire
10 years from the date of grant. The Company also grants
stock options to certain executives and key management employees
that vest upon meeting certain financial performance conditions
over the vesting schedule described above. These options are
referred to herein as performance-based options. All
performance-based options that were granted in fiscal 2006 and
in prior years expire five years from the date of grant.
Beginning in fiscal 2007, any performance options granted expire
10 years from the date of grant.
As of July 31, 2007, the Company has reserved
4,182,739 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock for
outstanding stock options and 1,987,500 shares of
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock remain for future issuance
of stock options under the various plans. The Company uses
treasury stock or will issue new Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock to deliver shares under these plans.
Changes in the options are as follows(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Option Price
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
6.08 - $20.15
|
|
|
|
3,872,484
|
|
|
$
|
15.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
22.63 - 31.54
|
|
|
|
888,000
|
|
|
|
27.27
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
9.59 - 17.33
|
|
|
|
(1,117,431
|
)
|
|
|
14.08
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
9.59 - 17.33
|
|
|
|
(113,722
|
)
|
|
|
15.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
9.59 - $31.54
|
|
|
|
3,529,331
|
|
|
$
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
33.75 - 40.37
|
|
|
|
955,500
|
|
|
|
36.33
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
9.59 - 28.84
|
|
|
|
(596,643
|
)
|
|
|
14.95
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
16.00 - 40.37
|
|
|
|
(73,136
|
)
|
|
|
27.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
9.59 - $40.37
|
|
|
|
3,815,052
|
|
|
$
|
23.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
32.93 - 38.19
|
|
|
|
908,000
|
|
|
|
36.74
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
9.59 - 28.84
|
|
|
|
(397,682
|
)
|
|
|
17.13
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
16.00 - 40.37
|
|
|
|
(142,631
|
)
|
|
|
35.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
9.59 - $40.37
|
|
|
|
4,182,739
|
|
|
$
|
26.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted for a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100%
stock dividend, effective December 31, 2004. |
II-44
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The total fair value of options vested during the fiscal years
ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $4,687, $4,744 and
$3,223, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 was $8,272, $13,974 and $14,754, respectively.
There were 2,300,239, 2,062,153 and 1,772,930 options
exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $21.07,
$17.02 and $14.84 at July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at July 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding and
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of
|
|
Outstanding at
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
at July 31,
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Up to $14.99
|
|
|
503,097
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
263,097
|
|
|
$
|
12.24
|
|
$15.00 to $29.99
|
|
|
1,943,806
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
20.79
|
|
|
|
1,717,970
|
|
|
|
19.69
|
|
$30.00 and up
|
|
|
1,735,836
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
36.52
|
|
|
|
319,172
|
|
|
|
35.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,182,739
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
26.36
|
|
|
|
2,300,239
|
|
|
|
21.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of the
number of options outstanding and the number of options
outstanding and exercisable was $39,548 and $32,494,
respectively.
The Company evaluates short-term regional performance based on
segment profit or loss and customer sales. Corporate long-term
performance is evaluated based on shareholder value enhancement
(SVE), which incorporates the cost of capital as a
hurdle rate for capital expenditures, new product development,
acquisitions, and long-term lines of business. Segment profit or
loss does not include certain administrative costs, interest,
foreign exchange gain or loss, other expenses not allocated to a
segment, and income taxes. The accounting policies of the
reportable segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies.
The Companys reportable segments are geographical regions
that are each managed separately. The Company has three
reportable segments: Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific. Each
reportable segment derives its revenue from the same types of
products and services.
II-45
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at cost plus a
standard percentage markup. Intercompany profit is eliminated in
consolidation. It is not practicable to disclose enterprise-wide
revenue from external customers on the basis of product or
service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Subtotals
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
609,855
|
|
|
$
|
416,514
|
|
|
$
|
336,262
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
52,595
|
|
|
|
6,511
|
|
|
|
23,554
|
|
|
|
82,660
|
|
|
$
|
(82,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
23,643
|
|
|
|
8,363
|
|
|
|
16,913
|
|
|
|
48,919
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
53,856
|
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
|
|
142,306
|
|
|
|
107,552
|
|
|
|
57,236
|
|
|
|
307,094
|
|
|
|
(8,208
|
)
|
|
|
298,886
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
781,868
|
|
|
|
347,827
|
|
|
|
376,645
|
|
|
|
1,506,340
|
|
|
|
192,517
|
|
|
|
1,698,857
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
19,834
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
40,984
|
|
|
|
10,956
|
|
|
|
51,940
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
498,916
|
|
|
$
|
319,432
|
|
|
$
|
200,088
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
54,716
|
|
|
|
4,017
|
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
65,109
|
|
|
$
|
(65,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
20,407
|
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
|
|
7,435
|
|
|
|
34,124
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
35,144
|
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
|
|
122,525
|
|
|
|
83,970
|
|
|
|
49,316
|
|
|
|
255,811
|
|
|
|
(10,633
|
)
|
|
|
245,178
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
643,206
|
|
|
|
255,635
|
|
|
|
338,424
|
|
|
|
1,237,265
|
|
|
|
127,921
|
|
|
|
1,365,186
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
22,838
|
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
7,303
|
|
|
|
36,538
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
39,410
|
|
Year ended July 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
417,780
|
|
|
$
|
274,691
|
|
|
$
|
123,976
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
45,284
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
52,460
|
|
|
$
|
(52,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
17,428
|
|
|
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
4,323
|
|
|
|
25,891
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
26,822
|
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
|
|
98,193
|
|
|
|
79,792
|
|
|
|
34,228
|
|
|
|
212,213
|
|
|
|
(4,845
|
)
|
|
|
207,368
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
446,829
|
|
|
|
171,536
|
|
|
|
111,048
|
|
|
|
729,413
|
|
|
|
120,734
|
|
|
|
850,147
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
19,392
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
21,920
|
|
II-46
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total profit for reportable
segments
|
|
$
|
307,094
|
|
|
$
|
255,811
|
|
|
$
|
212,213
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(8,208
|
)
|
|
|
(10,633
|
)
|
|
|
(4,845
|
)
|
Unallocated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative costs
|
|
|
(126,899
|
)
|
|
|
(88,662
|
)
|
|
|
(84,916
|
)
|
Investment and other
income net
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,934
|
)
|
|
|
(14,231
|
)
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
151,928
|
|
|
|
144,688
|
|
|
|
115,418
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(42,540
|
)
|
|
|
(40,513
|
)
|
|
|
(33,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues*
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets**
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
As of Years Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Geographic information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
589,013
|
|
|
$
|
484,387
|
|
|
$
|
411,614
|
|
|
$
|
537,182
|
|
|
$
|
439,467
|
|
|
$
|
321,482
|
|
China
|
|
|
184,413
|
|
|
|
90,519
|
|
|
|
41,480
|
|
|
|
121,181
|
|
|
|
114,653
|
|
|
|
8,669
|
|
Other
|
|
|
671,865
|
|
|
|
508,639
|
|
|
|
415,813
|
|
|
|
403,462
|
|
|
|
307,539
|
|
|
|
172,276
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(82,660
|
)
|
|
|
(65,109
|
)
|
|
|
(52,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
|
$
|
816,447
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,825
|
|
|
$
|
861,659
|
|
|
$
|
502,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Revenues are attributed based on country of origin. |
|
** |
|
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment,
other intangible assets and goodwill. |
II-47
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Net
Income Per Common Share
|
Net income per Common Share is computed by dividing net income
(after deducting the applicable preferential Class A Common
Stock dividends) by the weighted average Common Shares
outstanding of 53,906,769 for 2007, 49,493,976 for 2006, and
48,967,160 for 2005. The preferential dividend on the
Class A Common Stock of $.01665 per share has been added to
the net income per Class A Common Share for all years
presented.
Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator of the basic
and diluted per share computations for the Companys
Class A and Class B common stock are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (numerator for basic
and diluted Class A net income per share)
|
|
$
|
109,388
|
|
|
$
|
104,175
|
|
|
$
|
81,947
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferential dividends
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
(751
|
)
|
Preferential dividends on dilutive
stock options
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted
Class B net income per share
|
|
$
|
108,537
|
|
|
$
|
103,402
|
|
|
$
|
81,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income
per share for both Class A and B
|
|
|
53,907
|
|
|
|
49,494
|
|
|
|
48,967
|
|
Plus: effect of dilutive stock
options
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
Treasury shares
deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income
per share for both Class A and B
|
|
|
54,741
|
|
|
|
50,385
|
|
|
|
49,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock net
income per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
Class B common stock net
income per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,132,750, 650,500 and 38,000 shares of
Class A common stock were excluded from the computations of
diluted net income per share for years ended July 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, because the option exercise prices
were greater than the average market price of the common shares
and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.
II-48
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company has entered into various noncancellable operating
lease agreements. Rental expense charged to operations on a
straight-line basis was $22,779, $15,181 and $14,020 for the
years ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments required under such leases in
effect at July 31, 2007 are as follows, for the years
ending July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
23,097
|
|
2009
|
|
|
18,762
|
|
2010
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,639
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the normal course of business, the Company is named as a
defendant in various lawsuits in which claims are asserted
against the Company. In the opinion of management, the
liabilities, if any, which may ultimately result from lawsuits
are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial statements of the Company.
|
|
10.
|
Unaudited
Quarterly Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
332,259
|
|
|
$
|
321,275
|
|
|
$
|
346,332
|
|
|
$
|
362,765
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,631
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
150,161
|
|
|
|
169,151
|
|
|
|
173,604
|
|
|
|
657,044
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
51,941
|
|
|
|
32,724
|
|
|
|
46,303
|
|
|
|
41,019
|
|
|
|
171,987
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
34,448
|
|
|
|
19,709
|
|
|
|
28,987
|
|
|
|
26,244
|
|
|
|
109,388
|
|
Net Income Per Class A Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
232,635
|
|
|
$
|
230,974
|
|
|
$
|
266,494
|
|
|
$
|
288,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,436
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
123,991
|
|
|
|
117,105
|
|
|
|
140,755
|
|
|
|
143,904
|
|
|
|
525,755
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
44,129
|
|
|
|
31,276
|
|
|
|
44,226
|
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
|
|
156,516
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
30,198
|
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
|
|
30,246
|
|
|
|
22,477
|
|
|
|
104,175
|
|
Net Income Per Class A Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following significant events affect the comparability of the
fourth quarter results for fiscal 2007 and 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout fiscal 2007, the Company completed seven
acquisitions. Refer to Note 2. Acquisitions of Businesses
for further information on the companies acquired.
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company
recorded $7.5 million of pretax costs ($5.4 million
after-tax, or $0.10 per diluted share) associated with cost
reduction activities.
|
II-49
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures:
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of its management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
the Exchange Act Rule 13a 15(e)) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation,
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures are effective as of July 31, 2007.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
The management of Brady Corporation and subsidiaries is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principals.
With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of July 31, 2007, based on the framework and
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the
assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2007,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting is
effective based on those criteria. Managements assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting, as of July 31, 2007, has been audited
by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is
included herein.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, misstatements may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
The Company is in the process of implementing its enterprise
resource planning system, SAP, to many of its locations around
the world. This implementation has resulted in certain changes
to business processes and internal controls impacting financial
reporting. Management is taking the necessary steps to monitor
and maintain appropriate internal controls during this period of
change.
There were no other changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
II-50
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Brady Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting, that Brady Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of July 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of July 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of July 31, 2007, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
July 31, 2007 of the Company and our report dated
September 27, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Milwaukee, WI
September 27, 2007
II-51
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
II-52
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President, CEO and Director
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Sr. V.P., CFO
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
Michael O. Oliver
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Sr. V.P., Human Resources
|
Barbara Bolens
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
V.P., Treasurer, Director of
Investor Relations
|
Allan J. Klotsche
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
President Brady
Asia-Pacific and V.P., Brady Corporation
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
President Brady Europe
and V.P., Brady Corporation
|
Matt O. Williamson
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
President Brady
Americas and V.P., Brady Corporation
|
Thomas J. Felmer
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
President Direct
Marketing Americas and V.P., Brady Corporation
|
Robert L. Tatterson
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
V.P. and Chief Technology Officer
|
Conrad G. Goodkind
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Secretary and Director
|
Elizabeth Pungello
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Director
|
Peter J. Lettenberger
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert C. Buchanan
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Director
|
Roger D. Peirce
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard A. Bemis
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank W. Harris
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Gary E. Nei
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
Mary K. Bush
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank R. Jarc
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Chan W. Galbato
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Director
|
Patrick W. Allender
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank M. Jaehnert Mr. Jaehnert joined
the Company in 1995 as Finance Director of the Identification
Solutions & Specialty Tapes Group. He served as Chief
Financial Officer from November 1996 to January 2002. He served
as Senior Vice President of the Company and President,
Identification Solutions and Specialty Tapes Group from January
2002 to March 2003. In February 2003, he was appointed to his
current position, effective April 1, 2003. He has served as
a Director of the Company since April 2003. Before joining the
Company, he held various financial and management positions for
Robert Bosch GmbH from 1983 to 1995.
David Mathieson Mr. Mathieson joined
Brady in 2001 as European Finance Director, based in the U.K. In
August 2003, he was appointed Vice President of Finance for
North America, and named Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer in December 2003. Prior to joining Brady, he was Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Honeywell Europe,
concluding a
20-year
career with Honeywell International, Inc., which included
positions in Belgium, Denmark, United Kingdom and the United
States. A native of Scotland, he is a Fellow of the Chartered
Management Accountants Institute in the United Kingdom and
studied for this qualification at Glasgow College of Commerce
and Glasgow Caledonian University.
David R. Hawke Mr. Hawke joined the
Company in 1979. He served as General Manager of the Industrial
Products Division from 1985 to 1991. From 1991 to February 1995,
he served as Managing Director European Operations.
From February 1995 to August 2001, he served as Vice President,
Graphics Group. He served as Vice President, Graphics and
Workplace Solutions from August 2001 to January 2002. He served
as Senior Vice President of the Company and President, Graphics
and Workplace Solutions Group from January 2002 to April 2003.
In April 2003, he was appointed to his present position, and
will retire from that role on September 30, 2007.
III-1
Michael O. Oliver Mr. Oliver joined the
Company in February 1997 as Vice President Human
Resources. He was appointed to his present position in January
2002. Before joining the Company, he held various human resource
positions for Unilever from 1990 to 1997.
Barbara Bolens Ms. Bolens joined the
Company in 1986 and has held a wide variety of positions
beginning in customer service and customer service management
and progressing through product management and new product
development. For 10 years, she had been the Assistant
Treasurer and has held several other positions in the Corporate
Finance Team throughout that time. She was appointed to her
present position in November 2004. Ms. Bolens also holds
the position of Director of Investor Relations.
Allan J. Klotsche Mr. Klotsche joined
the Company in 1988. He served in a variety of sales, marketing,
technical, and management roles until 1998, when he was
appointed V.P. and General Manager of the Precision Tapes Group.
He was appointed to his current position in April 2003.
Peter C. Sephton Mr. Sephton joined the
Company in 1997 as Managing Director Seton-U.K. From
2001 to 2003 he served as managing director for Bradys
Identification Solutions Business in Europe. In April 2003, he
was appointed to his current position. Before joining Brady, he
served in a variety of international managerial roles with Tate
and Lyle Plc, Sutcliffe Speakman Plc and Morgan Crucible Plc. He
is a graduate in accountancy and law from The University of
Wales (UCC).
Matthew O. Williamson Mr. Williamson
joined the Company in 1979. From 1979 to 1994, he served in a
variety of sales and marketing leadership roles. In 1995,
Mr. Williamson served as the V.P. and General Manager of
the Specialty Tape business. From 1996 to 1998,
Mr. Williamson served as the V.P. and General Manager of
the Identification Solutions and Specialty Tapes Division. From
1998 to 2001, he served as V.P. and General Manager of the
Identification Solutions Division. From 2001 to 2003, he served
as V.P. and General Manager of the Global High Performance
Identification Business. In April 2003, he was appointed to his
current position.
Thomas J. Felmer Mr. Felmer joined the
Company in 1989 and has held several sales and marketing
positions until being named Vice President and General Manager
of Bradys U.S. Signmark Division in 1994. In 1999,
Mr. Felmer moved to Europe where he led the European
Signmark business for two years, then gained additional
responsibility for the combined European Seton and Signmark
businesses, which he also led for two years. In 2003,
Mr. Felmer returned to Milwaukee where he was responsible
for Bradys global sales and marketing processes, Brady
Software businesses, and due diligence/integration of the EMED
acquisition. In June 2004, he was appointed to his current
position.
Robert L. Tatterson Mr. Tatterson joined
the Company in 2006 as Vice President and Chief Technology
Officer. Before joining Brady, he held a variety of positions
with increasing responsibility at GE since 1992. Most recently,
Mr. Tatterson served as Technology General Manager for GE
Plastics Display and Optical Film business in Mt. Vernon,
Indiana. He is a 6 Sigma Master Blackbelt and holds a Ph.D. in
chemical engineering from the University of Michigan in Ann
Arbor.
Conrad G. Goodkind Mr. Goodkind has
served as Secretary of the Company since November 1999, and was
elected to the Board of Directors in September 2007. He will
serve as a member of the Governance, Finance and Retirement
Committees. He is a partner in the law firm of
Quarles & Brady LLP, which he joined in 1979. He
served as a member of the Executive Committee of
Quarles & Brady LLP from 1983 to 2005.
Mr. Goodkind was a director of Cade Industries, Inc. from
1989 to 1999, and a director of Able Distributing Co., Inc.,
from 1994 to 2005.
Elizabeth Pungello Dr. Pungello has
served as a Director of the Company since November 2003. She is
a member of the Companys Finance, Governance and
Technology Committees. Dr. Pungello is the
great-granddaughter of Brady founder William H. Brady, Sr.,
and a developmental psychologist at the Frank Porter Graham
Child Development Institute at the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. She has served as president of the Brady
Education Foundation (formerly the W.H. Brady Foundation) since
January 2001.
Peter J. Lettenberger Mr. Lettenberger
has served as a Director of the Company since January 1977.
Mr. Lettenberger is chair of the Companys Finance
Committee, and serves as a member of the Audit and Corporate
Governance Committees. He retired as a partner of
Quarles & Brady LLP, general counsel to the Company,
which he joined in 1964. Mr. Lettenberger will retire from
the Brady Board of Directors at the annual meeting in November
2007 pursuant to the Boards mandatory retirement age.
III-2
Robert C. Buchanan Mr. Buchanan has been
a Director of the Company since November 1987. Mr. Buchanan
is chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, and serves as a
member of the Audit and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Buchanan is the retired Chairman of the Board of Fox
Valley Corporation in Appleton, Wisconsin. He is also a trustee
of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.
Roger D. Peirce Mr. Peirce has served as
a Director of the Company since September 1988. Mr. Peirce
is a member of the Compensation, Corporate Governance and Audit
Committees of the Company, and chair of the Retirement
Committee. Mr. Peirce is a private investor and consultant
and is a director of Journal Communications, Inc. and Allete,
Inc. He was the secretary/treasurer of The Jor-Mac Company,
Inc., a metal fabricator in Grafton, Wisconsin, from 1997
through 2002. He was President and CEO of Valuation Research
Corporation from April 1995 to May 1996. From September 1988 to
December 1993, he was President of Super Steel Products Corp. in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Prior to that he was a managing partner
for Arthur Andersen LLP, independent certified public
accountants. Mr. Peirce will retire from the Brady Board of
Directors at the annual meeting in November 2007 pursuant to the
Boards mandatory retirement age.
Richard A. Bemis Mr. Bemis has been a
Director of the Company since January 1990 and is a member of
its Corporate Governance and Technology Committees.
Mr. Bemis is Co-chairman of the Board of Directors of Bemis
Manufacturing Company, a manufacturer of molded plastic products
in Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin. He is also a director of Integrys
Corporation, Chicago, Illinois.
Frank W. Harris Dr. Harris has been a
Director of the Company since November 1991. Dr. Harris is
a member of its Finance Committee, and chair of the Technology
Committee. He is a Emeritus Distinguished Professor of Polymer
Science at the University of Akron, and has been on its faculty
since 1983. He is also President and CEO of Akron Polymer
Systems, a company that develops and markets polymer films,
coatings and resins for high-performance applications.
Gary E. Nei Mr. Nei has been a Director
of the Company since November 1992. Mr. Nei is a member of
the Companys Finance Committee and Chair of its
Compensation Committee. Mr. Nei is Chairman of Nei-Turner
Media, a publishing company in Walworth, Wisconsin. He also
serves as Chairman of the Beverage Testing Institute, a
publishing company in Chicago, Illinois and Chairman of Tastings
Imports, an importer of fine wines headquartered in Chicago,
Illinois.
Mary K. Bush Ms. Bush has been a
Director of the Company since May 2000. Ms. Bush is a
member of the Companys Finance and Compensation
Committees. Ms. Bush has been President of Bush
International, LLC, a Washington D.C. firm that advises foreign
governments and U.S. companies on international financial
markets. Prior to establishing Bush International, Ms. Bush
held several positions in financial institutions and has served
three Presidents of the United States as Alternate Director of
the International Monetary Fund, Managing Director of the
Federal Housing Finance Board, a member of the Board of Sallie
Mae, and chairman of the HELP Commission. Ms. Bush also is
a member of the boards of directors of Discover Financial
Services, Briggs & Stratton Corporation, United
Airlines Corporation and ManTech International Corporation. She
is also a trustee of the Pioneer Funds and a member of the
Advisory Boards of Washington Mutual Investors Fund and Stern
Stewart.
Frank R. Jarc Mr. Jarc has been a
Director of the Company since May 2000. Mr. Jarc is chair
of Bradys Audit Committee and is a member of the
Compensation Committee and the Retirement Committee. He is a
consultant specializing in corporate development and
international acquisitions. From April 1999 to March 2000 he was
Senior Vice President of Corporate Development at Office Depot,
an operator of office supply superstores. Between June 1996 and
March 1999, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Viking Office Products, a direct mail marketer of
office products. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of R.R. Donnelley and Sons, a global
printing company.
Chan W. Galbato Mr. Galbato was elected
to the Board of Directors in November 2006, and serves as a
member of the Audit and Technology Committees. He is President
and CEO of the controls division of Invensys plc. Prior to his
current position, he served as president of services at Home
Depot; president and chief executive officer of Armstrong Floor
Products; chief executive officer of Choice Parts; and chief
executive officer of Coregis Insurance Company, a GE Capital
company.
Patrick W. Allender Mr. Allender was
elected to the Brady Corporation Board of Directors in September
2007 and will serve as a member of the Audit and Compensation
Committees. He is the former Executive Vice
III-3
President and Chief Financial Officer of Danaher Corporation,
which he joined in 1987 as CFO and secretary. Prior to joining
Danaher, Mr. Allender was a partner with Arthur Andersen
LLP.
All directors serve until their respective successors are
elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders. Officers
serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. None of the
Companys directors or executive officers has any family
relationship with any other director or executive officer.
Audit Committee Financial Expert The
Companys board of directors has determined that at least
one audit committee financial expert is serving on its audit
committee. Mr. Jarc, chair of the audit committee is a
financial expert and is independent as that term is used in
Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange
Act.
Director Independence A majority of the
directors must meet the criteria for independence established by
the Board in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange. In determining the independence of a director, the
Board must find that a director has no relationship that may
interfere with the exercise of his or her independence from
management and the Company. Based on these guidelines all
directors, with the exception of Frank Jaehnert, President and
CEO, are deemed independent.
Meetings of Non-management Directors The
non-management directors of the Board regularly meet alone
without any members of management present. Mr. Buchanan,
Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, is the presiding
director at these sessions. In fiscal 2007 there were five
executive sessions. Interested parties can raise concerns to be
addressed at these meetings by calling the confidential Brady
hotline at
1-800-368-3613.
Audit Committee Members The Audit Committee,
which is a separately-designated standing committee of the Board
of Directors, is composed of Mr. Jarc (Chairman),
Mr. Lettenberger, Mr. Peirce, Mr. Buchanan,
Mr. Galbato and Mr. Allender. Each member of the Audit
Committee has been determined by the Board to be independent
under the rules of the SEC and NYSE. The charter for the Audit
Committee is available on the Companys corporate website
at www.bradycorp.com.
Code of Ethics For a number of years, the
Company has had a code of ethics for its employees. This code of
ethics applies to all of the Companys employees, officers
and Directors. The code of ethics can be viewed at the
Companys corporate website, www.bradycorp.com, or may be
obtained in print by any shareholder by contacting Brady
Corporation, Investor Relations, P.O. Box 571,
Milwaukee, WI 53201. The Company intends to satisfy the
disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its
code of ethics by placing such information on its Internet
website.
Corporate Governance Guidelines Bradys
Corporate Governance Principles as well as the charters for the
Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee, and
Compensation Committee, are available on the Companys
Corporate website, www.bradycorp.com. Shareholders may request
printed copies of these documents from Brady Corporation,
Investor Relations, P.O. Box 571, Milwaukee, WI 53201.
Certifications We have attached the required
certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 regarding the quality of our public disclosures as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report. Additionally, on
December 13, 2006, the Company filed with the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) an annual certification
regarding our compliance with the NYSEs corporate
governance listing standards as required by NYSE
Rule 303A.12(a).
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who
own more than ten percent of a registered class of the
Companys equity securities, to file with the SEC initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of
Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company.
Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent
stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Companys knowledge, based solely on a review of the
copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written
representations that no other reports were required, during the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, all Section 16(a)
filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and
greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were complied
with, except for the initial Form 3 filing for Chan W.
Galbato.
III-4
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the
compensation philosophy, policies and practices of the Company
with respect to its named executive officers. This section
focuses on the compensation provided to the Companys
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and its
other three most highly compensated executives, who are
collectively referred to in this section as the named
executive officers.
For purposes of this section, named executive officers refers to
Frank M. Jaehnert, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director; David Mathieson, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer; David R. Hawke, Executive Vice President;
Peter C. Sephton, President Brady Europe and Vice
President, Brady Corporation; and Matthew O. Williamson,
President Brady Americas and Vice President, Brady
Corporation.
Executive
Compensation Overview and Philosophy
The goal of our executive compensation program is to build
long-term value for our shareholders by aligning the financial
interests of our management team with those of our shareholders.
It is also intended to properly attract, motivate and retain our
management team and ensure that executives are in possession of
a meaningful amount of Company stock.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is
responsible for monitoring and approving the compensation of the
Companys named executive officers. In compliance with this
responsibility, the Committee annually reviews and approves the
individual performance of these executives along with any
changes in their base salary, the payment of an annual cash
incentive and grant of equity awards. The Committee utilizes the
services of an independent executive compensation consulting
firm (Pearl Meyer & Partners) to assist with the
review and evaluation of our compensation levels and policies.
Their expertise is also utilized in modifying any existing or
proposing any new compensation arrangements. In addition to this
professional advice, the Committee relies upon its collective
judgment and other available competitive information and data in
making executive compensation decisions. The Committee has
avoided strict adherence to rigid guidelines, formulas or
short-term fluctuations in our stock price when determining or
modifying executive compensation.
In order to successfully achieve our Company objectives, a
combination of short-term and long-term incentives has been
developed. The Compensation Committee believes a proper balance
between these elements is necessary and includes a combination
of cash and equity, with fixed and variable components. These
components are heavily dependent upon Company financial
performance, while also taking into account personal performance
to a lesser degree. Our short-term incentive is in the form of
cash, while the long-term incentive is equity based and includes
both performance-based and time-based stock options. We believe
these programs are designed to specifically support the
achievement of the Companys profitability and sales goals.
We also believe these programs further enhance the performance
of the Company by providing effective tools to retain, attract
and motivate a group of highly skilled executives. This results
in strong financial and operational performance, which supports
the preservation and enhancement of shareholder value over time,
without incurring undue risk to our shareholders.
Annually senior management recommends a proposal for
compensation for each named executive officer, with the
exception of Frank M. Jaehnert, to the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee reviews the proposal for each officer
and ultimately approves a compensation arrangement for them.
Elements
of Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2007
As noted above, it is the Compensation Committees
philosophy that an executive compensation program should be used
to promote both the short and long-term financial objectives of
the Company, encourage the executives to act as owners of the
Company and attract and retain people who are qualified,
motivated and committed to excellence. The Compensation
Committee believes this can be accomplished through compensation
programs that provide a balanced mix of performance-based cash
and equity compensation. The annual bonus and equity
compensation provide incentives that reward superior performance
and provide financial consequences for underperformance.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the
overall level of compensation, as well as the various elements
of compensation for each of the named executive officers. In
addition to the specific process noted below for base salaries,
annual cash incentives and long-term equity compensation, the
Compensation Committee
III-5
reviews individual comprehensive tally sheets which
include the annual cash and equity grants, along with all other
benefits over a trailing four-year period. Stock options
exercised and the impact of the issuance of stock options on
earnings per share dilution are monitored on a regular basis as
well.
Base
Salary
Individual performance and competitiveness in the market are key
components in determining base salary and any changes in base
salary. Nationally recognized compensation surveys utilizing all
companies and industries are obtained annually. A regression
analysis is then performed by the Companys Human Resources
team based on the appropriate organization level (company,
group, division) and sales volume of the appropriate Brady
business. The base salary is designed to compensate executives
for their level of responsibility and sustained individual
performance. One consideration is the comparison of the
individual base salaries to the median for like positions and
responsibilities based on these nationally recognized
compensation surveys. The Compensation Committee annually
reviews base salaries to ensure, on the basis of responsibility
and performance, that executive compensation is meeting the
Compensation Committees principles.
In addition to the nationally recognized compensation surveys,
the Compensation Committee uses peer group data for similar
positions nationally to test the reasonableness and
competitiveness of base salary by position, but also uses
judgment to determine the appropriate level of base salary,
which we believe reflects individual performance and
responsibilities. The peer group utilized includes
29 companies that are in a similar industry with annual
revenues up to approximately $5 billion. Included in this
peer group is a smaller subset of 13 companies that have
annual revenues of less than $2 billion to provide data for
similar sized companies to Brady. The determination of base
salary also affects the annual bonus payout since an
individuals annual bonus target is expressed as a
percentage of base salary. The Compensation Committee also
utilizes the services of an outside consultant (Pearl
Meyer & Partners) to assist in understanding the
compensation levels in the market.
As a result of the factors noted above, base salary increases
varied for the named executive officers. For fiscal 2007, the
increases ranged from five to eleven percent.
Annual
Cash Incentive Bonus
All named executive officers participate in an annual cash
incentive plan. This plan has a short-term focus (one year) and
is mainly based on the fiscal year results. Corporate sales and
corporate net income results are included in the plan as well as
regional sales and regional segment profit results for those
with regional responsibility. In addition, each individual has
20% of their bonus based on their achievement of individual
goals.
As part of the annual review of compensation, the Compensation
Committee takes into account total annual cash compensation in
the marketplace, as reflected in the above mentioned peer group
and nationally recognized compensation surveys. Salary combined
with annual target bonus levels that have been established as a
percentage of salary are intended to approximate the median of
the market total annual cash compensation, as defined in
nationally recognized compensation surveys, provided that Brady
performs at a level to pay out at 100% of the targeted annual
incentive award. Bradys actual annual bonus payouts will
vary above or below the targeted amount based on the actual
performance of the Company during the fiscal year. The payouts
can range from 0% to 150% of the target. The Compensation
Committee expects Management to propose ambitious targets. Any
bonus payment above 100% of the target requires superior
performance by the Company.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the components of
these plans, the required performance levels at each target
payout level and the calculation of the individual bonus awards.
Sales and net income must exceed the prior year in order for
these components of the bonus plan to pay out.
The individual incentive target amounts are set at a percentage
of base salary and the target amounts are larger for individuals
with greater levels of responsibility. The target bonus
percentage for Mr. Jaehnert is 100% of his base salary, for
Mr. Hawke is 75% of his base salary, and for
Messrs. Mathieson, Sephton and Williamson are 70% of
III-6
their base salaries. These targets differ between individuals
because the market differs for each of the positions. The
following table provides the components of the target bonus
percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Name
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
Goals
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
31.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
Matthew O. Williamson
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
31.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, the Company paid
the following annual cash incentive bonuses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
Salary%
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
430,677
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
144,413
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
211,809
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
326,886
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
Matthew O. Williamson
|
|
|
234,939
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
%
|
The 2007 allocation of the annual cash incentive bonuses by
component is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Name
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Segment Profit
|
|
|
Goals
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
47.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
Matthew O. Williamson
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
84.1
|
%
|
The payouts in fiscal 2007 represent an achievement of 150% for
the consolidated net sales target of $1.26 billion, 34% for
the consolidated net income target of $125 million and 150%
for the regional net sales targets and 149% to 150% for the
regional segment profit targets for those named executive
officers with regional responsibility. A component of the payout
was also influenced by the individuals performance against
his individual goals.
Equity
Incentives: Long-term Incentive Compensation
The Company utilizes a combination of performance-based stock
options and time-based stock options to attract, retain and
motivate key employees who directly impact the performance of
the Company over a timeframe of greater than a year. The
combination of both performance-based stock options and
time-based stock options is used to provide a balance between
annual company performance and the generation of long-term
shareholder value. Stock option based plans are influenced by
Bradys stock price, which directly affects the amount of
compensation the executive receives upon vesting and exercising
the options. The number of options granted is determined by the
Compensation Committee with periodic input from its outside
consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners. In 2007, Pearl
Meyer & Partners reviewed the long-term incentive
compensation, as well as the total compensation of the
Companys five most highly compensated executives with the
five most highly compensated executives of peer companies
nationally. The peer group utilized in this analysis was the
same as used in the analysis of base salaries discussed above. A
comprehensive report was provided to the Compensation Committee
of its findings.
Performance-based
Stock Options:
In order to provide greater alignment between the financial
performance of the Company and the executives long-term
incentive compensation, the named executive officers have been
issued performance-based stock options which require specific
net income target attainment over a three year period in order
to vest. The net income target set on the options granted in
fiscal 2007 was $125 million in consolidated net income for
fiscal 2007, which was an aggressive target to reach and was
subsequently not met. Aggressive targets for fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2009 consolidated net income were also set and may be
difficult to achieve. As the targets for the fiscal year ended
July 31,
III-7
2007 were not met, one-third of these options did not vest. The
performance-based stock options that were granted in prior years
that had targets tied to fiscal 2007 consolidated net income
were met and the options did vest.
The grant date of the options was pre-determined in advance to
coincide with the beginning of the Companys fiscal year.
Consistent with the practice, the stock option grants were
reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee in July with
an effective grant date of the first working day of August. The
grant price is the fair market value of the stock on the grant
date and is calculated by taking the average of the high and low
stock price on that date. These stock options vest one-third
each fiscal year following the grant based on attaining the
predetermined minimum consolidated net income target each year.
These options have a maximum ten year life following the grant
date.
Time-based
Stock Options:
The timing of the grant of time-based stock options is
determined at the mid-November Compensation Committee meeting
each year. The grant date is established approximately two weeks
following the release of the first quarter earnings in November.
Time-based stock option grants in fiscal 2007 were reviewed and
approved by the Compensation Committee on November 15, 2006
with an effective grant date of November 30, 2006. The
grant price is the fair market value of the stock on the grant
date and is calculated by taking the average of the high and low
stock price on that date. The time-based stock options vest
one-third each year for the first three years and have a ten
year life.
Employment
and Post-Employment Benefits
General
Benefits:
The named executive officers receive the same basic benefits
that are offered by the Company to other employees, including
medical, dental, disability and life insurance.
Retirement
Benefits:
Most Brady employees in the United States and certain expatriate
employees working for its international subsidiaries are
eligible to participate in Brady Corporations Funded
Retirement Plan (Funded Retirement Plan) and the
Brady Corporation Matched 401(k) Plan (the Employee 401(k)
Plan). Under these plans the Company agrees to contribute
certain amounts to both Plans. Under the Funded Retirement Plan,
the Company contributes 4% of the eligible earnings of each
person covered by the Funded Retirement Plan. In addition,
participants may elect to have their annual pay reduced by up to
4% and have the amount of this reduction contributed to the
Employee 401(k) Plan and matched by an additional, equal
contribution by the Company. Participants may also elect to have
up to another 21% of their eligible earnings contributed to the
Employee 401(k) Plan (without an additional matching
contribution by the Company). The assets of the Employee 401(k)
Plan and Funded Retirement Plan credited to each participant are
invested by the trustee of the Plans as directed by each plan
participant in several investment funds as permitted by the
Employee 401(k) Plan and Funded Retirement Plan.
Due to the IRS income limitations for participating in the
Employee 401(k) Plan and the Funded Retirement Plan, the named
executive officers are eligible to participate in the Brady
Restoration Plan which is a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan that allows an equivalent benefit to the Employee 401(k)
Plan and the Funded Retirement Plan for the executives on their
income above the IRS limits.
Benefits are generally payable upon the death, disability, or
retirement of the participant or upon termination of employment
before retirement, although benefits may be withdrawn from the
employee 401(k) Plan and paid to the participant if required for
certain emergencies. Under certain specified circumstances, the
employee 401(k) Plan allows loans to be drawn on a
participants account. The participant is immediately fully
vested with respect to the contributions attributable to
reductions in pay; all other contributions become fully vested
over a three-year period of continuous service for the employee
401(k) Plan and after six years of continuous service for the
Funded Retirement Plan.
Deferred Compensation Arrangements During fiscal
2002, the Company adopted a deferred compensation plan titled
the Brady Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(Executive Deferred Compensation Plan), under which
executive officers, corporate staff officers and certain key
management employees of the Company are permitted to defer
portions of their salary and bonus into a plan account, the
value of which is measured by the fair value of the underlying
investments. The assets of the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan
III-8
are held in a Rabbi Trust and are invested by the trustee as
directed by the participant in several investment funds as
permitted by the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The
investment funds available in the Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan include Brady Corporation Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock and various mutual funds that are
provided in the Employee 401(k) Plan.
At least one year prior to termination of employment, the
executive must elect whether to receive his account balance
following termination of employment in a single lump sum payment
or by means of distribution under an Annual Installment Method.
If the executive does not submit an election form or has not
submitted one timely, then payment shall be made each year for a
period of ten years. The first payment must be one-tenth of the
balance held; the second one-ninth; and so on, with the balance
held in the Rabbi Trust reduced by each payment.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan was amended and restated to comply with the
provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Amounts deferred prior to January 1, 2005 (which were fully
vested under the terms of the plan), including past and future
earnings credited thereon, will remain subject to the terms in
place prior to January 1, 2005.
Perquisites:
Brady provides the named executive officers with the following
perquisites that are not available to other employees:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual allowance for financial and tax planning
|
|
|
|
Eligible for annual physical
|
|
|
|
Company car
|
|
|
|
Long-term care insurance
|
|
|
|
Personal liability insurance
|
|
|
|
Club membership
|
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
In order to encourage our executive officers and directors to
acquire and retain ownership of a significant number of shares
of the Companys stock, stock ownership guidelines have
been established. This supports our belief that stock ownership
better aligns the interests of our executives and directors with
the Companys shareholders.
The Board of Directors has established the following stock
ownership guidelines for our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
100,000 shares
|
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
30,000 shares
|
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
50,000 shares
|
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
20,000 shares
|
|
Matt O. Williamson
|
|
|
20,000 shares
|
|
Each director is required to beneficially own 5,000 shares
of Company stock.
Named executive officers have up to five years to achieve these
ownership levels. If an executive does not the meet the
ownership level at the end of the fifth year, the
executives after-tax payout on any incentive plans will be
in Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to bring the executive up
to the required level. The Compensation Committee reviewed the
actual stock ownership levels of each of the named executive
officers in February 2007 and found that each executive exceeded
the required level.
For purposes of determining whether an executive meets the
required ownership level, Company stock owned outright, Company
stock held in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and
Company stock owned in the Employee 401(k) Plan is included. In
addition, twenty percent of any vested stock options that are
in the money are included.
III-9
Employment
and Change of Control Agreements
In November 2004, the Board of Directors of Brady Corporation
approved change of control agreements for certain executive
officers of the Company including Mr. Mathieson,
Mr. Sephton, and Mr. Williamson. The agreements call
for payment of an amount equal to two times their annual base
salary and two times the average bonus payment received in the
two years immediately prior to the date the change of control
occurs in the event of termination or resignation upon a change
of control. The agreements also call for reimbursement of any
excise taxes imposed and up to $25,000 of attorney fees to
enforce the executives rights under the agreement.
Payments under the agreement will be spread over two years.
In May 2003, the Board approved a Change of Control Agreement
for Mr. Jaehnert. The agreement calls for payment of an
amount equal to three times the annual salary and bonus for
Mr. Jaehnert in the event of termination or resignation
upon a change of control. The agreement also calls for
reimbursement of any excise taxes imposed and up to $25,000 of
attorney fees to enforce the executives rights under the
agreement. Payments under the agreement will be spread over
three years.
In January 2001, the Board approved Change of Control Agreements
for certain of its executive officers, including Mr. Hawke.
The agreements call for payment of an amount equal to two times
their annual salary and bonus in the event of termination or
resignation upon a change in control with payments spread over
two years. The agreements also call for reimbursement of any
excise taxes imposed and up to $25,000 of attorney fees to
enforce the executives rights under the agreements. See
discussion of the retirement agreement entered into with
Mr. Hawke on July 9, 2007, in the narrative following
the Summary Compensation Table.
Compliance
with Tax Regulations Regarding Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, generally disallows a
tax deduction to public companies for compensation over
$1 million paid to the corporations chief executive
officer and the other named executive officers. Qualifying
performance-based compensation will not be subject to the
deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The
Companys executive compensation program, as currently
constructed, is not likely to generate significant nondeductible
compensation in excess of these limits. The Compensation
Committee will continue to review these tax regulations as they
apply to the Companys executive compensation program. It
is the Compensation Committees intent to preserve the
deductibility of executive compensation to the extent reasonably
practicable and to the extent consistent with its other
compensation objectives.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2007, the Boards Compensation Committee was
composed of Messrs. Bemis, Buchanan, Jarc, Nei and Peirce
and Ms. Bush. None of these persons has at any time been an
employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. There are no
relationships among the Companys executive officers,
members of the Compensation Committee or entities whose
executives serve on the Board that require disclosure under
applicable SEC regulations.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management; and based
on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in the Companys annual
report on
Form 10-K.
Gary E. Nei, Chairman
Patrick W. Allender
Richard A. Bemis
Robert C. Buchanan
Mary K. Bush
Frank R. Jarc
Roger D. Peirce
III-10
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth compensation awarded to, earned
by, or paid to the named executive officers, who were serving as
executive officers as of July 31, 2007 for services
rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries during the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name And Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
638,987
|
|
|
|
860,224
|
|
|
|
430,677
|
|
|
|
146,592
|
|
|
|
2,076,480
|
|
President &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
293,046
|
|
|
|
438,301
|
|
|
|
144,413
|
|
|
|
68,349
|
|
|
|
944,109
|
|
Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
401,153
|
|
|
|
371,772
|
|
|
|
211,809
|
|
|
|
1,071,485
|
|
|
|
2,056,219
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.C. Sephton(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
352,970
|
|
|
|
418,232
|
|
|
|
326,886
|
|
|
|
95,539
|
|
|
|
1,193,627
|
|
Vice President Brady
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. O. Williamson
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
279,340
|
|
|
|
418,232
|
|
|
|
234,939
|
|
|
|
66,817
|
|
|
|
999,328
|
|
Vice President Brady
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amounts expensed in fiscal 2007 relating to
grants of performance-based stock options and time-based stock
options. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), which requires it to
recognize compensation expense for stock options granted to
employees and directors based on the estimated fair value of the
awards at the time of grant. The assumptions used to determine
the value of the awards, including the use of the Black-Scholes
method of valuation by the Company, are discussed in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
contained in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
The actual value, if any, which an option holder will realize
upon the exercise of an option will depend on the excess of the
market value of the Companys common stock over the
exercise price on the date the option is exercised, which cannot
be forecasted with any accuracy. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects incentive plan compensation earned during the listed
fiscal year, which was paid during the next fiscal year. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in this column for Messrs. Jaehnert, Mathieson,
Hawke, and Williamson include: matching contributions to the
Companys Matched 401(k) Plan, Funded Retirement Plan and
Restoration Plan, the costs of group term life insurance for
each named executive officer, use of a Company car and
associated expenses, the cost of long-term care insurance, the
cost of personal liability insurance and other perquisites. The
perquisites may include an annual allowance for financial and
tax planning, the cost of an annual physical health exam, and
club membership dues. |
|
|
|
In addition to the amounts described in the table below,
$975,857 is included in this column for Mr. Hawke to
account for the accrual of payments required under the agreement
entered into on July 9, 2007, between the Company and
Mr. Hawke regarding the retirement from his current
position. See the narrative below for further explanation of the
agreement. |
|
|
|
The amounts in this column for Mr. Sephton include:
matching contributions for the Brady U.K. Pension Plan, the cost
of group term life insurance, use of a Company car and
associated expenses and other perquisites as listed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
GroupTerm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Care
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Car
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
104,230
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
26,935
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
7,885
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
146,592
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
36,801
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
23,149
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
5,362
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
68,349
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
57,097
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
18,448
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
95,628
|
|
P.C. Sephton(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
56,475
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
36,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,539
|
|
M. O. Williamson
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
36,396
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
22,510
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,817
|
|
III-11
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this table for Mr. Sephton, who works and
lives in the United Kingdom, were paid to him in British Pounds.
The amounts shown in U.S. dollars in the table above were
converted from British Pounds at the average exchange rate for
fiscal 2007: $1 = £0.5135. |
On July 9, 2007, the Company entered into a retirement
agreement with Mr. Hawke. Pursuant to the retirement
agreement, as of September 30, 2007, Mr. Hawkes
current position will be eliminated and Mr. Hawke will
assume the position of Chief Operating Officer of the Brady
Foundation until his retirement from the Corporation on
September 30, 2009. The retirement agreement provides that
Mr. Hawke will receive his current base salary, less
required withholding, and customary fringe benefits from
October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2009. As of
August 1, 2007, Mr. Hawke was no longer entitled to
new grants under the Companys stock option plans and was
no longer eligible to participate in the Companys cash
incentive plan. However, Mr. Hawke retained all rights with
respect to vesting and exercising of stock options granted prior
to that date and retained his current rights under the
Companys fiscal 2007 cash incentive plan. During the
period from August 1, 2007 through September 30, 2009,
Mr. Hawkes employment may only be terminated by the
Company for cause, which is defined in the retirement agreement
as misconduct or other wrongdoing contrary to the interests of
the Company.
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards for 2007
The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made
during fiscal 2007 to the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Under Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
BasePrice
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Plan Awards(1)
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Approval
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)(3)
|
|
|
($/Share)(4)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
8/1/2006
|
|
|
|
7/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,987
|
|
|
|
958,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
629,000
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
713,000
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
8/1/2006
|
|
|
|
7/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,132
|
|
|
|
307,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
8/1/2006
|
|
|
|
7/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,865
|
|
|
|
451,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
P.C. Sephton
|
|
|
8/1/2006
|
|
|
|
7/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,079
|
|
|
|
370,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
M.O. Williamson
|
|
|
8/1/2006
|
|
|
|
7/24/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,538
|
|
|
|
293,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The awards were made under the Companys annual cash
incentive plan. The structure of the plan is described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. Award levels are set
prior to the beginning of the fiscal year and payouts can range
from 0% to 150% of the target. |
|
(2) |
|
The options granted equally vest upon meeting certain financial
goals in fiscal 2007, 2008 and 2009. The structure of the grants
is described in Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. The
financial goals in 2007 have not been met so one-third of the
options have not vested and were cancelled. The options have a
term of ten years. |
|
(3) |
|
The options granted become exercisable as follows: one-third of
the shares on November 30, 2007, one-third of the shares on
November 30, 2008 and one-third of the shares on
November 30, 2009. These options have a term of ten years. |
|
(4) |
|
The exercise price is the average of the highest and lowest sale
prices of the Companys Class A Common Stock as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the
grant. The closing prices of the Companys Class A
Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on the
dates of the grants were $33.16 per share on August 1, 2006
and $38.38 per share on November 30, 2006, respectively. |
III-12
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
86,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1719
|
|
|
|
8/3/2008
|
|
|
|
|
17,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2813
|
|
|
|
10/14/2009
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1575
|
|
|
|
10/24/2010
|
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0000
|
|
|
|
10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875
|
|
|
|
11/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3100
|
|
|
|
2/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250
|
|
|
|
11/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
22.6325
|
|
|
|
8/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
33.8900
|
|
|
|
8/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300
|
|
|
|
11/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
(7)
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
8/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
11/30/2016
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0000
|
|
|
|
10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875
|
|
|
|
11/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250
|
|
|
|
11/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1450
|
|
|
|
12/15/2008
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1450
|
|
|
|
12/15/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
22.6325
|
|
|
|
8/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
33.8900
|
|
|
|
8/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300
|
|
|
|
11/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
8/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
11/30/2016
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0125
|
|
|
|
8/1/2008
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250
|
|
|
|
11/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
33.8900
|
|
|
|
8/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300
|
|
|
|
11/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
8/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
11/30/2016
|
|
P.C. Sephton
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1575
|
|
|
|
10/24/2010
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0000
|
|
|
|
10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875
|
|
|
|
11/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0125
|
|
|
|
11/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
22.6325
|
|
|
|
8/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
33.8900
|
|
|
|
8/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300
|
|
|
|
11/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
8/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1800
|
|
|
|
11/30/2016
|
|
M.O. Williamson
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0000
|
|
|
|
10/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3875
|
|
|
|
11/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.3250
|
|
|
|
11/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
22.6325
|
|
|
|
8/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8425
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
33.8900
|
|
|
|
8/1/2010
|
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8300
|
|
|
|
11/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
33.2250
|
|
|
|
8/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1900
|
|
|
|
11/30/2016
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted for a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100%
stock dividend, effective December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
All vest on February 24, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
All vest on August 2, 2007 as the performance criteria for
fiscal 2007 consolidated net income of $90 million have
been met. |
|
(4) |
|
All vest on November 18, 2007. |
III-13
|
|
|
(5) |
|
One-half of the options vest on August 1, 2007 as the
performance criteria for fiscal 2007 consolidated net income of
$100 million have been met and one-half of the options will
vest on August 1, 2008 if the performance criteria for
fiscal 2008 consolidated net income are met. |
|
(6) |
|
One-half of the options vest on November 30, 2007 and
one-half of the options vest on November 30, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
One-half of the options will vest on August 1, 2008 if the
performance criteria for fiscal 2008 consolidated net income are
met and one-half of the options will vest on August 1, 2009
if the performance criteria for fiscal 2009 consolidated net
income are met. |
|
(8) |
|
One-third of the options vest on November 30, 2007,
one-third of the options vest on November 30, 2008 and
one-third of the options vest on November 30, 2009. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2007
The following table summarizes option exercises completed during
fiscal 2007 to the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
on Exercise ($)
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
17,905
|
|
|
|
489,310
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
704,625
|
|
P.C. Sephton
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
998,540
|
|
M.O. Williamson
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
988,770
|
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2007
The following table summarizes the activity within the Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan and the Brady Restoration Plan during
fiscal 2007 for the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Name
|
|
Last Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
|
Distributions ($)
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
|
F.M. Jaehnert
|
|
|
354,531
|
|
|
|
96,800
|
|
|
|
170,386
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,349,108
|
|
D. Mathieson
|
|
|
236,816
|
|
|
|
26,715
|
|
|
|
37,878
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
650,345
|
|
D.R. Hawke
|
|
|
529,511
|
|
|
|
46,934
|
|
|
|
466,728
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,074,098
|
|
P.C. Sephton
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
M.O. Williamson
|
|
|
66,439
|
|
|
|
25,070
|
|
|
|
35,794
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
519,176
|
|
See discussion of the Companys nonqualified deferred
compensation plan in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
The executive contribution amounts reported here are reported in
the salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of
the Summary Compensation Table.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
As described in the Employment and Change of Control Agreements
section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above, the
Company has entered into change of control agreements with each
of the named executive officers. The terms of the change of
control agreement are triggered if within a 24 month period
beginning with the date a change of control occurs, (i) the
executives employment with the Company is involuntarily
terminated other than by reason of death, disability or cause or
(ii) the executives employment with the Company is
voluntarily terminated by the executive subsequent to
(a) any reduction in the total of the executives
annual base salary, exclusive of fringe benefits, and the
executives target bonus in comparison with the
executives annual base salary and target bonus immediately
prior to the date the change of control occurs, (b) a
significant diminution in the responsibilities or authority of
the executive in comparison with the executives
responsibility and authority immediately prior to the date the
change of control occurs, or (c) the imposition of a
requirement by the Company that the executive relocate to a
principal work location more than 50 miles from the
executives principal work location immediately prior to
the date the change of control occurs.
III-14
Following termination due to a change in control, the executive
shall be paid a multiplier of his annual base salary in effect
immediately prior to the date the change of control occurs, plus
a multiplier of his average bonus payment received over either a
two or three-year period, depending on the terms of the
agreement, prior to the date the change of control occurs. The
Company will also reimburse the executive for any excise tax
incurred by the executive as a result of Section 280(G) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Company will also reimburse a
maximum of $25,000 of legal fees incurred by the executive in
order to enforce the change of control agreement, in which the
executive prevails.
The following information and tables set forth the amount of
payments to each named executive officer in the event of
termination of employment as a result of a change of control. No
other employment agreements have been entered into between the
Company and any of the named executive officers, with the
exception of the retirement agreement entered into with
Mr. Hawke discussed in the narrative following the Summary
Compensation Table.
Assumptions and General Principles. The
following assumptions and general principles apply with respect
to the tables that follow in this section.
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts shown in the tables assume that each named executive
officer terminated employment on July 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the tables reflect amounts earned as of
July 31, 2007 and include estimates of amounts that would
be paid to the named executive officer upon the occurrence of a
change in control. The actual amounts that would be paid to a
named executive officer can only be determined at the time of
termination.
|
|
|
|
The tables below include amounts the Company is obligated to pay
the named executive officer as a result of the executed change
in control agreement. The tables do not include benefits that
are paid generally to all salaried employees or a broad group of
salaried employees. Therefore, the named executive officers
would receive benefits in addition to those set forth in the
tables.
|
|
|
|
A named executive officer is entitled to receive base salary
earned during his term of employment regardless of the manner in
which the named executive officers employment is
terminated. As such, this amount is not shown in the tables.
|
Frank
M. Jaehnert
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the
terms of the change of control agreement were triggered on
July 31, 2007 and the named executive officer had to
legally enforce the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Excise Tax
|
|
|
Legal Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
|
Acceleration Gain $(3)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)(4)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,950,000
|
|
|
|
2,394,010
|
|
|
|
4,808,931
|
|
|
|
929,691
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
10,107,632
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents three times the base salary in effect at
July 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents three times the average bonus payment received in the
last three fiscal years ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of
$34.99 and the exercise price on 313,333 unvested stock options
in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
David
Mathieson
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the
terms of the change of control agreement were triggered on
July 31, 2007 and the named executive officer had to
legally enforce the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Excise Tax
|
|
|
Legal Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
|
Acceleration Gain $(3)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)(4)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
527,608
|
|
|
|
236,467
|
|
|
|
248,422
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1,637,497
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the
last two fiscal years ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of
$34.99 and the exercise price on 56,667 unvested stock options
in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
III-15
David
R. Hawke
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the
terms of the change of control agreement were triggered on
July 31, 2007 and the named executive officer had to
legally enforce the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Legal Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
|
Acceleration Gain $(3)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)(4)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810,000
|
|
|
|
782,310
|
|
|
|
112,890
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1,730,200
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the
last two fiscal years ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of
$34.99 and the exercise price on 46,667 unvested stock options
in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Peter
C. Sephton
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the
terms of the change of control agreement were triggered on
July 31, 2007 and the named executive officer had to
legally enforce the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Excise Tax
|
|
|
Legal Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
|
Acceleration Gain $(3)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)(4)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,581
|
|
|
|
569,880
|
|
|
|
236,465
|
|
|
|
241,139
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1,824,065
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31,
2007. As Mr. Sephton works and lives in the
United Kingdom, his base salary is paid to him in British
Pounds. The amount shown in U.S. dollars was converted from
British Pounds at the July month-end exchange rate: $1 =
£0.4923. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the
last two fiscal years ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of
$34.99 and the exercise price on 56,667 unvested stock options
in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Matt
O. Williamson
The following table shows the amount payable assuming that the
terms of the change of control agreement were triggered on
July 31, 2007 and the named executive officer had to
legally enforce the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Legal Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
|
Acceleration Gain $(3)
|
|
|
Reimbursement ($)(4)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,000
|
|
|
|
507,068
|
|
|
|
236,465
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1,338,533
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two times the base salary in effect at July 31,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents two times the average bonus payment received in the
last two fiscal years ended July 31. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between the closing market price of
$34.99 and the exercise price on 56,667 unvested stock options
in-the-money that would vest due to the change in control. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum reimbursement of legal fees allowed. |
Compensation
of Directors
To ensure competitive compensation for the directors, surveys
prepared by various consulting firms and the National
Association of Corporate Directors are reviewed. Directors who
are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation
for service on the Board or on any committee of the Board.
Effective December 1, 2006, directors who were not also
employees of the Company received an annual retainer of $35,000
plus $6,000 for each committee they chaired ($10,000 for the
audit committee chair) and $1,500 plus expenses for each meeting
of the Board or any committee thereof, which they attended and
were a member or $1,000 for single issue telephonic committee
meetings of the Board. Directors also received $1,000 for each
meeting they attended of any committee for which they were not a
member.
III-16
Directors are also granted 6,000 time-based stock options in
November of each year while they are serving on the Board. Upon
election to the Board, a director is granted 10,000 time-based
stock options. The grant price is the fair market value of the
stock on the grant date and is calculated by taking the average
of the high and low stock price on that date. The options vest
one-third each year for the first three years and have a ten
year life.
Directors are also eligible to defer portions of their fees into
the Brady Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Plan
(Director Deferred Compensation Plan), the value of
which is measured by the fair value of the underlying
investments. The assets of the Director Deferred Compensation
Plan are held in a Rabbi Trust and are invested by the trustee
as directed by the participant in several investment funds as
permitted by the Director Deferred Compensation Plan. The
investment funds available in the Director Deferred Compensation
Plan include Brady Corporation Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock and various mutual funds that are provided in the Employee
401(k) Plan.
At least one year prior to termination from the Board, the
director must elect whether to receive
his/her
account balance following termination in a single lump sum
payment or by means of distribution under an Annual Installment
Method. If the director does not submit an election form or has
not submitted one timely, then payment shall be made each year
for a period of ten years. The first payment must be one-tenth
of the balance held; the second one-ninth; and so on, with the
balance held in the Trust reduced by each payment.
Director
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash ($)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(1)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Elizabeth Pungello
|
|
|
67,833
|
|
|
|
52,667
|
|
|
|
120,500
|
|
Peter J. Lettenberger
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
144,047
|
|
Robert C. Buchanan
|
|
|
83,500
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
134,547
|
|
Roger D. Peirce
|
|
|
94,750
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
145,797
|
|
Richard A. Bemis
|
|
|
63,333
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
114,380
|
|
Frank W. Harris
|
|
|
65,250
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
116,297
|
|
Gary E. Nei
|
|
|
70,750
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
121,797
|
|
Mary K. Bush
|
|
|
61,583
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
112,630
|
|
Frank R. Jarc
|
|
|
88,750
|
|
|
|
51,047
|
|
|
|
139,797
|
|
Chan W. Galbato
|
|
|
49,750
|
|
|
|
31,867
|
|
|
|
81,617
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amounts expensed in fiscal 2007 relating to
grants of stock options. The Company accounts for stock-based
compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), which
requires it to recognize compensation expense for stock options
granted to employees and directors based on the estimated fair
value of the awards at the time of grant. The assumptions used
to determine the value of the awards, including the use of the
Black-Scholes method of valuation by the Company, are discussed
in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Company contained in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The grant date
fair value of options granted in fiscal 2007 for each director
was $86,040 for Ms. Pungello, Mr. Lettenberger,
Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Peirce, Mr. Bemis,
Mr. Harris, Mr. Nei, Ms. Bush and Mr. Jarc
and $143,400 for Mr. Galbato. |
|
|
|
The actual value, if any, which an option holder will realize
upon the exercise of an option will depend on the excess of the
market value of the Companys common stock over the
exercise price on the date the option is exercised, which cannot
be forecasted with any accuracy. |
|
|
|
Outstanding option awards at July 31, 2007 for each
director include the following: Ms. Pungello,
24,000 shares; Mr. Lettenberger, 21,000 shares;
Mr. Buchanan, 22,000 shares; Mr. Peirce,
35,000 shares; Mr. Bemis, 37,000 shares;
Mr. Harris, 33,000 shares; Mr. Nei,
34,334 shares; Ms. Bush, 27,000 shares;
Mr. Jarc, 36,000 shares; and Mr. Galbato,
10,000 shares. |
III-17
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
(a)
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership
of shareholders who are known by the Company to own more than
five percent (5%) of any class of the Companys voting
shares on August 15, 2007. As of that date, nearly all of
the voting stock of the Company was held by two trusts
controlled by direct descendants of the Companys founder,
William H. Brady, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Ownership(2)
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
Brady Corporation Class B Common
Stock Trust(1)
|
|
|
1,769,304
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
c/o Elizabeth
P. Pungello
2002 S. Hawick Ct.
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Brady III
Revocable Trust of 2003(3)
|
|
|
1,769,304
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
c/o William
H. Brady III
249 Rosemont Ave.
Pasadena, CA 91103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The trustee is Elizabeth P. Pungello, who has sole voting and
dispositive power and who is the remainder beneficiary.
Elizabeth Pungello is the great-granddaughter of William H.
Brady and currently serves on the Companys Board of
Directors. |
|
(2) |
|
An additional 20 shares are owned by a third trust with
different trustees. |
|
(3) |
|
William H. Brady III is special trustee of this trust and
has sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to these
shares. William H. Brady III is the grandson of William H.
Brady. |
III-18
|
|
(b)
|
Security
Ownership of Management
|
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership
of each class of equity securities of the Company by each
Director or Nominee and by all Directors and Officers of the
Company as a group as of August 15, 2007. Unless otherwise
noted, the address for each of the listed persons is
c/o Brady
Corporation, 6555 West Good Hope Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53223. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned
directly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner & Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
Ownership(7)
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
Elizabeth P. Pungello(1)
|
|
|
2,528,805
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Frank M. Jaehnert(2)
|
|
|
377,557
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Felmer
|
|
|
151,071
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Hawke
|
|
|
140,443
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan J. Klotsche
|
|
|
127,181
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Mathieson
|
|
|
119,338
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael O. Oliver
|
|
|
99,303
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter C. Sephton
|
|
|
97,733
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew O. Williamson
|
|
|
87,833
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Peirce
|
|
|
62,199
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad G. Goodkind
|
|
|
45,716
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Bemis
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank W. Harris
|
|
|
40,329
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary E. Nei(3)
|
|
|
29,665
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Buchanan(4)
|
|
|
26,234
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jarc
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara Bolens
|
|
|
18,433
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary K. Bush
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Lettenberger
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chan W. Galbato
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Tatterson
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick W. Allender(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Officers and Directors as a
Group (22 persons)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
Elizabeth P. Pungello(1)
|
|
|
1,769,304
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates less than one-tenth of one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Pungellos holdings of Class A Common Stock
include 300,000 shares held jointly with her spouse and
2,216,805 shares owned by trusts for which she is a trustee
and has either sole or joint dispositive and voting authority.
Ms. Pungellos holdings of Class B Common Stock
include 1,769,304 shares owned by a trust over which she
has sole dispositive and voting authority. |
|
(2) |
|
Of the amount reported, Mr. Jaehnerts spouse owns
5,446 shares of Class A Common Stock directly. |
|
(3) |
|
Of the amount reported, Mr. Nei owns 7,331 shares of
Class A Common Stock directly (with respect to which he
shares voting and investment power with his spouse). |
|
(4) |
|
Of the amount reported, Mr. Buchanan owns 14,534 shares as
co-trustee of three separate trusts. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Allender was elected to the Board of Directors in
September 2007 and owned no shares of Class A Common Stock
as of the reporting date. |
|
(6) |
|
The amount shown for all officers and directors individually and
as a group (22 persons) includes options to acquire a total
of 1,313,021 shares of Class A Common Stock, which are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days
of August 15, 2007, including the following: Ms. Pungello,
12,000 shares; Mr. Jaehnert, 368,762 shares; Mr. Felmer,
150,333 shares; Mr. Hawke, 108,333 shares;
Mr. Klotsche, |
III-19
|
|
|
|
|
125,167 shares; Mr. Mathieson, 113,933 shares;
Mr. Oliver, 87,093 shares; Mr. Sephton,
97,333 shares; Mr. Williamson, 87,833 shares; Mr.
Peirce, 23,000 shares; Mr. Goodkind, 0 shares;
Mr. Bemis, 25,000 shares; Mr. Harris,
21,000 shares; Mr. Nei, 22,334 shares; Mr. Buchanan, 10,000
shares; Mr. Jarc, 19,000 shares; Ms. Bolens,
17,900 shares; Ms. Bush, 15,000 shares;
Mr. Lettenberger, 9,000 shares; Mr. Galbato,
0 shares; Mr. Tatterson, 0 shares;
Mr. Allender, 0 shares. It does not include other
options for Class A Common Stock which have been granted at
later dates and are not exercisable within 60 days of
August 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
In addition to the shares shown in this table, the officers and
directors as a group owned the equivalent of 493,731 shares
of the Companys Class A Common Stock in its deferred
compensation plans. |
No arrangements are known to the Company, which may, at a
subsequent date, result in a change in control of the Company.
|
|
(d)
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under
|
|
|
|
to be issued upon
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
equity compensation
|
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
plans (excluding
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
securities reflected in
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
4,182,739
|
|
|
$
|
26.36
|
|
|
|
1,987,500
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,182,739
|
|
|
$
|
26.36
|
|
|
|
1,987,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plans allow the
granting of stock options to various officers, directors and
other employees of the Company at prices equal to fair market
value at the date of grant. The Company has reserved 300,000 and
2,000,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock for
issuance under the 2005 and 2006 Plans, respectively. Generally,
options will not be exercisable until one year after the date of
grant, and will be exercisable thereafter, to the extent of
one-third per year and have a maximum term of ten years. In
August 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, certain executives and
key management employees were issued stock options that vest
upon meeting certain financial performance conditions in
addition to the vesting schedule described above. The options
granted in 2003, 2004 and 2005 have a maximum term of five years
and the options granted in 2006 and 2007 have a maximum term of
ten years. All grants under the Option Plans are at market price
on the date of the grant.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
Conrad G. Goodkind serves as the Secretary and a Director of the
Company. He is a partner of Quarles & Brady LLP, which
provides legal services to the Company.
III-20
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The following table presents the aggregate fees incurred for
professional services by Deloitte & Touche LLP and
Deloitte Tax LLP during the years ended July 31, 2007 and
2006. Other than as set forth below, no professional services
were rendered or fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP
or Deloitte Tax LLP during the years ended July 31, 2007
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Audit, audit-related and tax
compliance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$
|
2,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,495
|
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Tax fees compliance
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal audit, audit-related
and tax compliance fees
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
Non-audit related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees planning and
advice
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
Other fees(3)
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-audit related
fees
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
4,568
|
|
|
$
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the
audit of the Companys annual financial statements,
attestation of managements assessment of internal control,
reviews of the quarterly financial statements and statutory
reporting compliance. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees include fees related to due diligence and
employee benefit plan audits. |
|
(3) |
|
All other fees include fees related to expatriate activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Ratio of Tax Planning and Advice
Fees and All Other Fees to Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and
Tax Compliance Fees
|
|
|
.7 to 1
|
|
|
|
.7 to 1
|
|
Pre-Approval Policy The services performed by
the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(Independent Auditors) in fiscal 2006 and 2007 were
pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy and
procedures adopted by the Audit Committee at its
November 19, 2003 meeting. The policy requires the Audit
Committee to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services
performed by the Independent Auditors in order to assure that
the provision of such services does not impair the
auditors independence. Unless a type of service to be
performed by the Independent Auditors has received general
pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost
levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
III-21
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
Item 15 (a) The following documents are filed
as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
& 2) Consolidated Financial Statement
Schedule
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules are omitted as they are not required, or the
required information is shown in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
|
3) Exhibits See Exhibit Index at
page IV-2
of this
Form 10-K.
IV-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation
of Brady Corporation(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws of Brady Corporation, as
amended(2)
|
|
*10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Brady Corporation
(2004) Change of Control Agreement entered into with David
Mathieson, Peter Sephton, and Matthew Williamson(17)
|
|
*10
|
.2
|
|
Brady Corporation BradyGold Plan,
as amended(2)
|
|
*10
|
.3
|
|
Executive Additional Compensation
Plan, as amended(2)
|
|
*10
|
.4
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan, as amended(21)
|
|
*10
|
.5
|
|
Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended(21)
|
|
*10
|
.6
|
|
Brady Corporation 1989
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended(9)
|
|
*10
|
.7
|
|
Brady Corporation 2004 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan, as amended(9)
|
|
*10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Brady Corporation 2004
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2004 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan, as amended(18)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Brady Corporation Automatic
Dividend Reinvestment Plan(4)
|
|
*10
|
.10
|
|
Brady Corporation 2005
Nonqualified Plan for Non-employee Directors, as amended(11)
|
|
*10
|
.11
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreements under 2005 Non-qualified Plan for Non-employee
Directors, as amended(11)
|
|
*10
|
.12
|
|
Brady Corporation 1997 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan, as amended(9)
|
|
*10
|
.13
|
|
Brady Corporation 1997
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors(7)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Credit
Agreement(19)
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
Brady Corporation 2006 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan(20)
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
Brady Corporation Incentive
Compensation Plan for Elected Corporate Officers(20)
|
|
*10
|
.17
|
|
Change of Control Agreement dated
January 5, 2001, between Brady Corporation and David R.
Hawke(10)
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
Complete and Permanent Release and
Retirement Agreement, dated July 9, 2007, between Brady
Corporation and David R. Hawke
|
|
*10
|
.23
|
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated
August 1, 1997, between Brady Corporation and David R.
Hawke(8)
|
|
*10
|
.24
|
|
Amendment to Change of Control
Agreement dated May 20, 2003, between Brady Corporation and
Frank M. Jaehnert(14)
|
|
*10
|
.25
|
|
Restated Brady Corporation
Restoration Plan(5)
|
|
*10
|
.26
|
|
Brady Corporation 2001 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan, as amended(9)
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Credit
Agreement (Replaced by Exhibit 10.14)(12)
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
First Amendment to Credit
Agreement (Replaced by Exhibit 10.14)(6)
|
|
*10
|
.29
|
|
Brady Corporation 2003 Omnibus
Incentive Stock Plan, as amended(9)
|
|
*10
|
.30
|
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated
June 18, 2003, between Brady Corporation and David R.
Hawke(16)
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Brady Note Purchase Agreement
dated June 28, 2004(15)
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
First Supplement to Note Purchase
Agreement, dated February 14, 2006(13)
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Second Supplement to Note Purchase
Agreement, dated March 23, 2007(5)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Brady Corporation
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte &
Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of David Mathieson
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of
Frank M. Jaehnert
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of
David Mathieson
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
IV-2
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Registration
Statement
No. 333-04155
on
Form S-3 |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 15, 2006 |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1992 |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 26, 2007 |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006 |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1997 |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1997 |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007 |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001 |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed December 4, 2006 |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2004 |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 17, 2006 |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2003 |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
8-K/A filed
August 3, 2004 |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003 |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 24, 2004. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 20, 2006 |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 17, 2007 |
IV-3
BRADY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31,
|
|
Description
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Valuation accounts deducted in
balance sheet from assets to which they apply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
allowance for losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
6,390
|
|
|
$
|
3,726
|
|
|
$
|
3,869
|
|
Additions Charged to
expense
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
Due to acquired businesses
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Deductions Bad debts
written off, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,109
|
|
|
$
|
6,390
|
|
|
$
|
3,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserve for
slow-moving inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
13,555
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
$
|
7,434
|
|
Additions Charged to
expense
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Due to acquired businesses
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period
|
|
$
|
18,073
|
|
|
$
|
13,555
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-4
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized this
28th day
of September 2007.
Brady Corporation
David Mathieson
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
M. Jaehnert
F.
M. Jaehnert
|
|
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ P.
J.
Lettenberger
P.
J. Lettenberger
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
A. Bemis
R.
A. Bemis
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
W. Harris
F.
W. Harris
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
C. Buchanan
R.
C. Buchanan
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
D. Peirce
R.
D. Peirce
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ G.
E. Nei
G.
E. Nei
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M.
K. Bush
M.
K. Bush
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
R. Jarc
F.
R. Jarc
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ E.
P. Pungello
E.
P. Pungello
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
IV-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C.
W. Galbato
C.
W. Galbato
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C.
G. Goodkind
C.
G. Goodkind
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ P.
W. Allender
P.
W. Allender
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
IV-6