ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Hagens Berman: Class-Action Lawsuit Says Tesla’s Automatic Software Updates Derate Batteries, Violate Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Tesla Model S and Model X drivers sue for non-consensual software updates causing 20% decrease in vehicle driving range, battery failure

Tesla owners and lessors today filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit against the automaker, following reports that Tesla’s automatic software updates to the Model S and Model X cause a 20% decrease in driving range and leave some class members to pay $15,000 or more for a new battery, according to Hagens Berman.

The lawsuit, filed on May 12, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims affected Teslas are “protected computers” under the definition outlined in the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and that the automatic updates which have led to decreased battery performance and battery failure violate consumers’ rights under the law.

If you own or lease a Tesla Model S or Model X, find out more about the lawsuit and sign up.

“Tesla owners and lessors are uniquely at the mercy of the maker of their cars, and Tesla imposes software updates without consent whenever their vehicle is connected to Wi-Fi,” said Steve Berman, managing partner at Hagens Berman and attorney representing Tesla owners and lessors in the lawsuit. “We believe Tesla defrauds consumers and abuses this feature of its vehicles’ design, and it’s time to show Tesla that it’s not above the law.”

Tesla Admits Software Updates Cause Battery Drain

Attorneys say Tesla denies reimbursement to Model S and Model X owners and lessors who experience reduced battery capacity following a software update. The automaker has not, however, denied the relationship between software updates and decreased battery performance in prior litigation, according to today’s lawsuit.

In a 2019 class action against Tesla, the automaker did not bother to challenge allegations that an update had imposed an “artificial, software induced limitation” on the battery capacity of class vehicles. Instead, Tesla moved almost immediately to settlement negotiations with vehicle owners. That case also highlights a supporting declaration from Tesla’s counsel which openly admits to a 10% decrease in battery performance following a May 2019 software update.

Typically, attorneys say, when an automaker wants to perform a software update of any kind on a vehicle, it notifies drivers and describes the reason for the update. This gives customers the opportunity to choose whether to receive the update and ask questions about potential effects. Because Tesla can issue automatic updates whenever the vehicle is connected to Wi-Fi, and Tesla tells consumers that the software updates cannot be cancelled or reversed, Model S and Model X owners and lessors are left to believe they have no recourse if they encounter unwanted consequences as the result of a Tesla software update.

The lawsuit emphasizes that battery performance and longevity is at the heart of Tesla’s marketing, and states that the company, “represents that its batteries will outlast the vehicles themselves.” But some drivers have been told they must pay $15,000 or more for a new battery after an automatic software update leaves the old one completely inoperable, according to attorneys. The lawsuit states, “At no point during the process does Tesla warn drivers that software updates pushed onto the vehicles will result in the depletion of battery life, which – according to Tesla, are designed to last the life of the vehicle.”

“The fact that Tesla touts battery performance as a defining feature of its vehicles makes Tesla’s own software updates a particularly egregious violation of consumer rights,” Berman said. “It’s time to hit the brakes on Tesla’s unchecked exploitation of its own customers.”

In addition to claims that Tesla has violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the lawsuit also brings claims of violation of the California Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

Learn more about the case against Tesla for automatic software updates leading to battery deration.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  244.22
+21.36 (9.58%)
AAPL  270.37
-1.03 (-0.38%)
AMD  256.12
+1.28 (0.50%)
BAC  53.45
+0.42 (0.79%)
GOOG  281.82
-0.08 (-0.03%)
META  648.35
-18.12 (-2.72%)
MSFT  517.81
-7.95 (-1.51%)
NVDA  202.49
-0.40 (-0.20%)
ORCL  262.61
+5.72 (2.23%)
TSLA  456.56
+16.46 (3.74%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.