ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Erlich Law Firm Achieves $1.23 Million Trial Victory in High-Profile Labor Employment Case

Employment Lawyer Erlich Law Firm California

Oakland, California – In a landmark victory that underscores the firm’s commitment to workplace justice, Erlich Law Firm has secured a significant verdict for their client in Mendoza v. County of Orange. Jason Erlich, a seasoned employment attorney known for his dedication to protecting workers’ rights, represented the plaintiff with attorney Bijan Darvish of the Law Office of Bijan Darvish, APC, in a challenging case that encompassed allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and a hostile work environment.

The case centered around the plaintiff Mendoza, whose claims of suffering under a culture of workplace harassment and subsequent retaliation were vindicated with a total settlement of $1.23 million. The legal battle highlighted the pervasive issues of workplace harassment and employer retaliation, casting a stark light on the emotional and career damages experienced by victims.

Erlich Law Firm, renowned for its expertise in labor and employment law, leveraged its extensive knowledge to advocate on behalf of Mendoza. The case involved complex legal nuances, including whistleblower retaliation and constructive discharge claims.

“This jury verdict is not only a triumph for our client but also a message to employers everywhere,” said Jason Erlich. “It reaffirms the notion that no worker should endure a hostile work environment or any form of retaliation for standing up against unlawful practices.”

The resolution of Mendoza v. County of Orange serves as a significant reminder of the legal protections afforded to employees in the United States. Erlich Law Firm’s success in this case demonstrates its unwavering resolve to pursue justice for those who have been wronged in their places of employment.

The verdict earned the firm’s placement in the prestigious Top 50 Labor Employment Verdicts list which is a testament to its strategic litigation skills and the meaningful impact it continues to make in the labor and employment sector. Erlich Law Firm’s work reflects a broader trend within the legal community toward ensuring safe and respectful workplaces free from harassment and discrimination.

As society continues to grapple with the complexities of labor and employment law, the success of Erlich Law Firm in high-stakes cases positions it as a leading advocate for employees’ rights. With a proven track record of securing favorable outcomes for its clients, the firm remains at the forefront of the ongoing battle for workplace fairness and dignity.

The outcome of the Mendoza case indeed marks a significant milestone in the push for accountability and change within the workplace. Erlich Law Firm’s dedication to its clients and its expertise in labor law continues to set a high standard for legal excellence in the field.

CASE INFORMATION
Orange County Superior Court, California
Glenda Mendoza v. County of Orange
Case No. 30-2019-01063389-CU-OE-CJC.



Erlich Law Firm has more than 20 years of experience in holding employers accountable for their illegal actions against the people who work for them. If you believe your rights at work have been violated, you could potentially be entitled to damages from your employer.

Erlich Law Firm
180 Grand Ave. Suite 1380 Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 788-2337
https://erlich.lawyer/
Press Contact : Jason Erlich

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.