ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Kellogg vs. J.M. Smucker: Which Packaged Food Stock is a Better Buy?

Despite rising food prices, strong demand for packaged foods with longer shelf life should allow food makers to pass over rising input costs to customers and profit substantially. Therefore, we think Kellogg (K) and J. M. Smucker (SJM) should benefit. But which of these stocks is a better buy now? Read more to find out.

Deepening supply chain bottlenecks and rising energy and transportation costs have pushed food prices higher lately. However, strong demand for packaged and ready-to-cook food products with prolonged shelf life should allow food makers to handle rising input costs by passing them on to the customers. Also, rapid digitalization of operations and new product launches to keep pace with changing consumer tastes should benefit these companies substantially.

Investor interest in this consumer defensive industry is evident from the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF’s (FTXG) 4.3% gains over the past three months versus the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF’s (SPY) 10.4% loss. The global packaged food market is expected to grow at a 6.3% CAGR to $4.26 trillion by 2026. 

Kellogg Company (K) and J.M. Smucker Company (SJM) are two prominent players in the packaged foods industry. K manufactures and markets ready-to-eat cereal, frozen, and convenience foods. It sells its products to retailers through direct sales forces, brokers, and distributors. SJM produces and markets branded food and beverage products and pet food and snacks worldwide. Both the companies sell their products to food retailers and wholesalers through direct sales forces, brokers, and distributors.

While SJM gained 3.3% over the past month, K surged 7.8%. K is a clear winner with 13.6% gains year-to-date versus SJM’s 6.2% returns. But which of these stocks is a better pick now? Let’s find out.

Recent Financial Results

K’s consolidated net sales for its fiscal 2022 first quarter ended April 2, 2022, increased 2.5% year-over-year to $3.67 billion. The company’s gross profit came in at $1.12 billion, down 6.3% from the prior-year period. Its adjusted operating profit came in at $476 million, indicating a 4.2% year-over-year decline. While its adjusted net income decreased 1.1% year-over-year to $376 million, its adjusted EPS fell marginally to $1.10. As of April 2, 2022, the company had $313 million in cash and cash equivalents.

K will pay a $0.58 quarterly cash dividend on June 15, 2022. The stock pays a $2.32 per share dividend annually, translating to a 3.17% yield. The company’s dividend has grown at a 2.41% rate over the past five years. K has increased its dividends for 17 consecutive years.

For its fiscal 2022 third quarter ended January 31, 2022, SJM’s net sales decreased marginally year-over-year to $2.06 billion. The company’s adjusted gross profit came in at $712.30 million, down 8.2% from the prior-year period. Its adjusted operating income came in at $377.90 million, representing a 6.4% fall from the year-ago period. SJM’s adjusted net income came in at $252.50 million, indicating an 8.6% year-over-year decline. Its adjusted EPS came in at $2.33, representing a 4.9% decline from the prior-year period. The company had $54.48 million in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2022.

SJM will pay a $0.99 quarterly cash dividend on June 1, 2022. The stock pays a $3.96 per share dividend annually, translating to a 2.74% yield. The company’s dividend has grown at a 5.71% rate over the past five years. SJM has increased its dividends for 19 consecutive years.

 Past and Expected Financial Performance

Over the past three years, K’s EBITDA and EPS have increased at CAGRs of 3.5% and 9.9%, respectively.

K’s EPS is expected to decrease 1.2% year-over-year in fiscal 2022, ending December 31, 2022, and rise 4.6% in fiscal 2023. Its revenue is expected to grow 2.8% in fiscal 2022 and 2% in fiscal 2023. Analysts expect the company’s EPS to grow at a 2.6% rate per annum over the next five years.

Over the past three years, SJM’s EBITDA and EPS have increased at CAGRs of 1.8% and 1.3%, respectively.

Analysts expect SJM’s EPS to decline 6.2% year-over-year in fiscal 2023, ending April 30, 2023, and 4% in fiscal 2024. Its revenue is expected to decline 0.8% year-over-year in fiscal 2022 and rise 1% in fiscal 2023. Analysts expect the company’s EPS to grow at a 1.6% rate per annum over the next five years.

Valuation

In terms of non-GAAP forward PEG, SJM is currently trading at 24.19x, 412.5% higher than K’s 4.72x. In terms of forward EV/Sales, K’s 2.25x compares with SJM’s 2.50x.

Profitability

K’s trailing-12-month revenue is almost 1.8 times SJM’s. K is also more profitable, with a 7.6% levered free cash flow margin versus SJM’s 7.1%.

Furthermore, K’s ROE, ROA, and ROTC of 38.9%, 7.1%, and 10.7% compare with SJM’s 7%, 4.3%, and 5.4%, respectively.

POWR Ratings

While K has an overall B grade, which translates to Buy in our proprietary POWR Ratings system, SJM has an overall C grade, equating to Neutral. The POWR Ratings are calculated by considering 118 distinct factors, each weighted to an optimal degree.

Both K and SJM have been graded a C for Value, in sync with their slightly higher-than-industry valuation ratios. K’s 2.25x forward EV/Sales is 25.3% higher than the 1.80x industry average. SJM has a 2.50x forward EV/Sales, 39.3% higher than the 1.80x industry average.

K has a B grade for Quality, which is consistent with its higher-than-industry profitability ratios. K’s 44.5% trailing-12-month return on common equity (ROE) is 227.8% higher than the 13.6% industry average. SJM’s C grade for Quality is in sync with its lower-than-industry profitability ratios. SJM has a 7% trailing-12-month ROE, which is 48.5% lower than the 13.6% industry average.

Of the 87 stocks in the B-rated Food Makers industry, K is ranked #22, while SJM is ranked #36.

Beyond what we have stated above, our POWR Ratings system has graded SJM and K for Sentiment, Growth, Stability, and Momentum. Get all SJM ratings here. Also, click here to see the additional POWR Ratings for K.

The Winner

Despite rising input costs, the strong demand for packaged food products should benefit K and SJM in the coming months. However, relatively lower valuation and higher profitability make K a better buy here.

Our research shows that the odds of success increase if one bets on stocks with an Overall POWR Ratings of Buy or Strong Buy. Click here to access the top-rated stocks in the Food Makers industry.


K shares were trading at $73.34 per share on Tuesday afternoon, up $0.18 (+0.25%). Year-to-date, K has gained 14.86%, versus a -13.88% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.



About the Author: Sweta Vijayan

Sweta is an investment analyst and journalist with a special interest in finding market inefficiencies. She’s passionate about educating investors, so that they may find success in the stock market.

More...

The post Kellogg vs. J.M. Smucker: Which Packaged Food Stock is a Better Buy? appeared first on StockNews.com
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.