ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

FERC must reduce barriers to energy market participation

It's time for regulators in 13 states to allow retail program participation in wholesale markets. And FERC could make it even easier.

What do large Walmart Supercenters have in common with small programmable thermostats? Both cannot participate in wholesale energy markets in 13 Midwest states. Regulators in these states fear their utilities will lose control over their customers by allowing Walmart to participate in Midwest energy markets. Permitting aggregators like Walmart and allowing aggregation of smart devices like Google Nest thermostats will reduce grid emergencies.

One of the common reasons for states like Minnesota to say no to aggregators of retail customers is the fear that regulated utilities would lose their customers. This fear is unfounded in states like Illinois that allow aggregators. The largest electric utility in Illinois, ComEd, does not own generation but owns the distribution system wires, and retail customers get a bill from their aggregator. More than a million residential customers in Illinois have switched to a Retail Electric Supplier, according to Plug In Illinois, a website administered by the Illinois Commerce Commission, the state energy regulator.

Another reason state regulators do not approve their utility’s retail program participation in wholesale markets is the fear of an industrial load curtailment in Minnesota for an emergency in North Dakota since both these states are lumped in a zone for capacity purposes. Again, this is not a legitimate fear because one of the benefits of participating in a market is the availability to tap into resources across multiple states. That’s why utilities in these states have united voluntarily to establish this market. States rely on each other for selling surplus capacity and buying deficient capacity when needed.


Join us on Feb. 6, 2023 in San Diego for the inaugural GridTECH Connect Forum, the only event that brings together utility leaders and distributed energy resource developers to overcome the challenges associated with interconnection. Learn more about the new, regional event from Clarion Energy today.

Join us for discussions on virtual power plants, fleet electrification, interconnection, demand response, and more, with a focus on the California market. Register today!


What is true for generation capacity must be true for demand programs also.

Realizing the mistake with the 2011 demand response ruling, which was litigated at the US Supreme Court, the federal regulator did not give this opportunity for state regulators to “opt-out” of electric storage technologies in 2018 and distributed energy resources in 2020. That’s why it is time for the 13 states — Arkansas, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin — to accept the writing on the energy markets wall and to “opt-in.”

Sean Casten, the Democratic Congressman from Illinois, introduced a bill in August called Responsive Energy Demand Unlocks Clean Energy, the REDUCE Act, to urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to eliminate these states’ opt-out because FERC has not taken any action since opening an inquiry into the participation of aggregators in March 2021.

FERC should act now because the Midwest grid operator is falling short of capacity in the summer of 2023. This capacity deficiency, coupled with extreme weather, increases the chances of grid emergencies. But most of the solutions to address the potential grid emergencies are transmission-oriented. However, transmission cannot be built overnight, but demand flexibility can be. Even repairing large power equipment when damaged due to criminal activity takes time, as 40,000 North Carolina residents are finding out.

Before the start of summer, grid operators and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation warned about summer blackouts. California narrowly avoided the blackout this past September. The same authorities warned about winter blackouts. And in both seasons, the solutions proposed have a common theme – transmission – because only the transmission utilities have enough staff to attend the monthly meetings at grid operators and NERC.

Transmission lines outside Houston, Texas (Courtesy: BFS Man/Flickr)

Transmission takes more than a decade to build. But smart programmable technologies to reduce our demand are available now. Today most homes have smart devices like a Google Nest thermostat. These devices can aggregate and provide the homeowner with the capability to reduce demand during grid emergencies. Utilities in these 13 states want to control this aggregation capability.

Not everyone is concerned about utility control. The New York Independent System Operator is gearing up for Consolidated Edison retail programs to participate in NYISO wholesale markets starting next year. NYISO’s market enables ConEdison’s electricity consumers to earn money, similar to Airbnb, which enables a homeowner to earn a few bucks when they are out of town. Walmart’s Texas Retail Energy LLC is an NYISO market participant.

In conclusion, regulators in the 13 states must allow retail programs such as smart thermostats to meet their state’s capacity needs. These states can help their utilities manage grid emergencies as soon as the summer of 2023. The Feds must remove the decade-old flexibility afforded to states. Walmart and other aggregators must be allowed to operate in these 13 states.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.