Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

 

---

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF 2011 ANNUAL MEETING
AND
PROXY STATEMENT

---

Table of Contents

April 18, 2011

Dear Stockholder:

        You are cordially invited to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Neenah Paper, Inc. to be held at the Company's headquarters located at Preston Ridge III, 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time.

        The formal business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting is described in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to: (i) elect three Class I directors for a three-year term; (ii) approve an advisory vote on the Company's executive compensation; (iii) approve an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the Company's executive compensation; and (iv) approve certain performance measures under the Neenah Paper, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan; and (v) ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. At the Annual Meeting, we will provide a brief report on our operations and our plans for the future. Our directors and executive officers, as well as representatives from Deloitte & Touche LLP, will be present to respond to questions from stockholders.

        Please mark, date, sign and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope or vote electronically using the Internet or telephone voting procedures described in the attached Proxy Statement, at your earliest convenience. This will assure that your shares will be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting, even if you do not attend.

---

Table of Contents

Neenah Paper, Inc.

Preston Ridge III
3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600
Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

---

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 18, 2011

---

        NOTICE HEREBY IS GIVEN that the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Neenah Paper, Inc. will be held at the Company's headquarters located at Preston Ridge III, 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, for the purpose of considering and voting upon:

1.

A proposal to elect as Class I directors the three nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement to serve until the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;



2.

A proposal to approve an advisory vote on the Company's executive compensation;



3.

A proposal to approve an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the Company's executive compensation;



4.

A proposal to approve certain performance measures under the Neenah Paper, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan;



5.

A proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Neenah Paper, Inc. for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011; and



6.

Such other business as properly may come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to be presented to a vote of the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

        Information relating to the above matters is set forth in the attached Proxy Statement. Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2011 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.

        The Proxy Statement and the 2010 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at http://www.neenah.com/proxydocs.

Alpharetta, Georgia
April 18, 2011

PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED PROXY STATEMENT AND THEN PROMPTLY COMPLETE, EXECUTE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE ELECTRONICALLY USING THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED PROXY STATEMENT.

---

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

---

Table of Contents

Neenah Paper, Inc.

Preston Ridge III
3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600
Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

---

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 18, 2011

        

---

        This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of Neenah Paper, Inc. in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors to be voted at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any adjournments thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held at the Company's headquarters located at Preston Ridge III, 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. When used in this Proxy Statement, the terms "we," "us," "our," "the Company" and "Neenah" refer to Neenah Paper, Inc.

        The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement and form of proxy card are first being sent or given to stockholders is April 18, 2011.

VOTING

General

        The securities that can be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, with each share entitling its owner to one vote on each matter submitted to the stockholders. The record date for determining the holders of common stock who are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is the close of business March 31, 2011. On the record date 14,897,665 shares of common stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Quorum and Vote Required

        The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

        In voting with regard to the proposal to elect as Class I directors (Proposal 1) the three nominees named herein, stockholders may vote for all nominees listed herein, withhold their votes as to all nominees or withhold their votes as to specific nominees. The vote required to approve Proposal 1 is a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, provided a quorum is present. Votes that are withheld will be considered as shares present and entitled to vote for the proposal, and therefore will have the same legal effect as votes against the proposal.

        In voting with regard to the proposal to approve, on an advisory non-binding basis, the Company's executive compensation (Proposal 2), stockholders may vote in favor of the proposal, against the

3

---

Table of Contents

proposal, or may abstain from voting. The vote required to approve Proposal 2 is set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present. As a result, abstentions will be considered in determining the number of votes required to obtain the necessary majority vote for the proposal, and therefore, will have the same legal effect as voting against the proposal.

        In voting with regard to the proposal to approve, on an advisory non-binding basis, the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3), stockholders may vote for a frequency of one, two or three years. The frequency (every one, two or three years) receiving the greatest number of votes of the shares represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present, will be considered the frequency preferred by stockholders. As a result, abstentions will therefore have no effect on such vote.

        In voting with regard to the proposal to approve the performance measures under the Neenah Paper, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Omnibus Plan") (Proposal 4), stockholders may vote in favor of the proposal, against the proposal, or may abstain from voting. The vote required to approve Proposal 4 is set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present. As a result, abstentions will be considered in determining the number of votes required to obtain the necessary majority vote for the proposal, and therefore, will have the same legal effect as voting against the proposal.

        In voting with regard to the proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 5), stockholders may vote in favor of the proposal, against the proposal, or may abstain from voting. The vote required to approve Proposal 5 is a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, provided a quorum is present. Abstentions will be considered as shares present and entitled to vote for the proposal, and therefore will have the same legal effect as votes against the proposal.

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank or brokerage firm (in "street name") and you do not vote your shares, your bank or brokerage firm can vote your shares in their discretion upon proposals which are considered "discretionary" proposals. We believe that Proposal 5 is a discretionary proposal. However, brokers are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions to the broker for proposals which are considered "non-discretionary" (a "broker non-vote"). We believe Proposals 1 through 4 are non-discretionary proposals. As such, broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining if a quorum is present, but will not be considered as shares entitled to vote on Proposals 1 through 4, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of these proposals.

Proxy Voting Procedures

        You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting. Giving us your proxy means you authorize us to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you direct.

        If your shares are held in your name, you can vote by proxy in three convenient ways:

•

Via Internet:  Go to http://www.proxyvoting.com/np and follow the instructions.



•

By Telephone:  Call toll-free 1-866-540-5760 and follow the instructions.



•

In Writing:  Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

4

---

Table of Contents

        If your shares are held in street name, the availability of telephone and internet voting will depend on the voting processes of the applicable bank or brokerage firm; therefore, it is recommended that you follow the voting instructions on the form you receive from your bank or brokerage firm.

        In addition, stockholders can view this Proxy Statement and Neenah's 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders at http://www.neenah.com/proxydocs. All properly executed proxies received by Neenah in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions noted on the proxy card. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote upon such matters according to their judgment.

        Any stockholder of record delivering a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is voted: (i) by giving written notice to Steven S. Heinrichs, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Neenah, at Preston Ridge III, 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005; (ii) by submitting a proxy card bearing a later date, including a proxy submitted via the Internet or by telephone; or (iii) by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that any beneficial owner of our common stock whose shares are held in street name may (a) revoke his or her proxy and (b) attend and vote his or her shares in person at the Annual Meeting only in accordance with applicable rules and procedures, as then may be employed by such beneficial owner's brokerage firm or bank. In particular, in order to attend and vote his or her shares at the Annual Meeting, a beneficial owner generally must obtain a form of proxy or other appropriate documentation from such beneficial owner's brokerage firm or bank.

        We are also sending this Proxy Statement and voting materials to participants in various employee benefit plans of Neenah. The trustee of each plan, as the stockholder of record of the shares of common stock held in the plan, will vote whole shares of stock attributable to each participant's interest in the plan in accordance with the directions the participant gives or, if no directions are given by the participant, in accordance with the directions received from the applicable plan committees.

        In addition to soliciting proxies through the mail, we may solicit proxies through our directors, officers and employees, in person and by telephone or facsimile. We expect to retain Georgeson Inc. to aid in the solicitation at a cost of approximately $8,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. Brokerage firms, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries also may be requested to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by them. We will pay all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

        We will announce the final results on our web site at www.neenah.com shortly after the meeting and on Form 8-K immediately following the meeting.

        If a signed proxy card is received which does not specify a vote or an abstention, then the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted FOR the election of all Class I director nominees described herein, FOR the approval of the executive compensation plan, IN FAVOR of the every one year say on pay vote, FOR the approval of the performance measures under the Omnibus Plan, and FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011. Neenah is not aware, as of the date hereof, of any matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting other than those stated in this proxy statement. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the enclosed proxy card gives discretionary authority to the persons named as proxies to vote the shares represented thereby in their discretion.

5

---

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2011 with respect to: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of the named executive officers appearing elsewhere herein; and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group, based in each case on information furnished to us by such persons. As used in this Proxy Statement, "beneficial ownership" means that a person has, as of March 31, 2011, or may have within 60 days thereafter, the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting of a security and/or the sole or shared investment power to dispose of or direct the disposition of a security.

6

---

Table of Contents

7

---

Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2010 for each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

8

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1—
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        The Board currently consists of eight members, divided into two classes of three directors and one class of two directors. The directors in each class serve three year terms, with the terms of the Class I directors expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting. The Board has nominated Timothy S. Lucas, Philip C. Moore, and John P. O'Donnell each a current director of Neenah, for re-election as Class I directors at the 2011 Annual Meeting. If elected, the nominees will serve a three-year term expiring at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.

        Each of the nominees has consented to serve another term as a director if re-elected. If any of the nominees should be unavailable to serve for any reason (which is not anticipated), the Board may designate a substitute nominee or nominees (in which event the persons named on the enclosed proxy card will vote the shares represented by all valid proxy cards for the election of such substitute nominee or nominees), allow the vacancies to remain open until a suitable candidate or candidates are located, or by resolution provide for a lesser number of directors.

        If any incumbent nominee for director in an uncontested election should fail to receive the required affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, under Delaware law the director remains in office as a "holdover" director until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or death. In the event of a holdover director, the Board of Directors in its discretion may request the director to resign from the Board. If the director resigns, the Board of Directors may immediately fill the resulting vacancy, allow the vacancy to remain open until a suitable candidate is located and appointed or adopt a resolution to decrease the authorized number of directors.

        The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote "FOR" the proposal to elect Timothy S. Lucas, Philip C. Moore and John P. O'Donnell as Class I directors for a three-year term expiring at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

        Set forth below is certain information as of March 31, 2011, regarding the three nominees and each director continuing in office, including their ages, principal occupations (which have continued for at least the past five years unless otherwise noted), current Board experience and participation, and how the background, experience and qualification of each nominee and director make them well suited to serve on Neenah's Board.

Information Regarding Directors Nominated for Reelection

        Timothy S. Lucas, CPA, age 64, has served as an independent consultant on financial reporting issues practicing as Lucas Financial Reporting since 2002. From 1988 to 2002, Mr. Lucas worked at the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), where he was the Director of Research and Technical Activities, and Chairman of the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force. Mr. Lucas has served as a director of Neenah since November 30, 2004. Mr. Lucas received his BA in Economics and BS in Accounting from Rice University and his Master of Accounting from the Jesse H. Jones Graduate School, Rice University. Mr. Lucas' experience at FASB and his educational background make him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

        Philip C. Moore, age 57, is a partner at McCarthy Tétrault, L.L.P., a national Canadian law firm. Mr. Moore practices corporate and securities law, with particular emphasis on corporate governance and finance, mergers and acquisitions and other business law issues. Mr. Moore has been with McCarthy Tétrault, L.L.P. since 1988. From 1994 to 2000, Mr. Moore was a director of Imax Corporation. He is currently a director of various private companies. Mr. Moore has served as a

9

---

Table of Contents

director of Neenah since November 30, 2004. Mr. Moore received his BA from McMaster University and his LLB from Queen's University. Mr. Moore's educational background and extensive experience in corporate governance and business law makes him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

        John P. O'Donnell, age 50, is currently a Senior Vice President of the Company and Chief Operating Officer. Effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 18, 2011, Mr. O'Donnell will become CEO and President of the Company. Prior to his position as COO, Mr. O'Donnell served as President, Fine Paper. Mr. O'Donnell was employed by Georgia-Pacific Corporation from 1985 until 2007 and held increasingly senior management positions in the Consumer Products division. Mr. O'Donnell served as President of the North American Retail Business from 2004 through 2007, and as President of the North American Commercial Tissue business from 2002 through 2004. Mr. O'Donnell's extensive experience in the paper and consumer products industries, and his leadership positions in the Company, make him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

Class II Directors—Term Expiring at the 2012 Annual Meeting

        Mary Ann Leeper, Ph.D., age 70, is Senior Strategic Advisor of The Female Health Company. She stepped down as its President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2006; a position she held since 1996. Dr. Leeper was President and Chief Operating Officer of The Female Health Company Division of the Wisconsin Pharmacal Company from 1994 to 1996, and held other senior positions from 1987 to 1994 in the Wisconsin Pharmacal Company (renamed The Female Health Company in 1996). Dr. Leeper has served as a Director of The Female Health Company since 1987. Dr. Leeper has been an Adjunct Professor at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business MBA program since 2001. She held senior positions at G D Searle, was Assistant Professor at Temple University Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, as well as a biochemist for Wyeth Laboratories and McNeil Laboratories. Dr. Leeper's educational background includes a B.S., Drexel University; M.S., Temple University, M.M., Northwestern University and Ph.D. from Temple University. Dr. Leeper has served as a director of Neenah since November 30, 2004. Dr. Leeper's educational background and her experience as senior executive of a technical manufacturing company makes her an effective member of Neenah's Board.

        Stephen M. Wood, Ph.D., age 64, is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of FiberVisions which is a leading global manufacturer of synthetic fibers for consumer products, construction and industrial applications. Dr. Wood is also Vice Chairman of the Board of ESFV which is a global joint venture with Chisso Corporation, a leading Japanese Chemical Company. FiberVisions is jointly owned by SPG Partners and Hercules Incorporated. From 2001 to 2004, Dr. Wood served as the Chief Executive Officer of Kraton Polymers, a specialties chemical company, and Chairman and Representative Director of JSR Kraton Elastomers, a Japanese joint venture company. Prior to this Dr. Wood was President of the Global Elastomers business unit of Shell Chemicals, Ltd., and a Vice President of that company. Dr. Wood was also elected International President of the International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers. Dr. Wood has a BSc in Chemistry and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Nottingham University, United Kingdom and is a graduate of the Institute of Chemical Engineers. Dr. Wood has served as a director of Neenah since November 30, 2004. Dr. Wood's educational background and his experience as a senior executive of a chemical manufacturing company provides the knowledge base and experience to make him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

Class III Directors—Term Expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting

        Sean T. Erwin, age 59, is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Erwin is retiring as CEO and President, effective on the date of the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and will continue to serve as non-executive Chairman after that date. Prior to the spin-off of Neenah from Kimberly-Clark Corporation on November 30, 2004 (the "spin-off"), Mr. Erwin had been an employee of Kimberly-Clark since 1978, and had held increasingly

10

---

Table of Contents

senior positions in both finance and business management. In January 2004, Mr. Erwin was named President of Kimberly-Clark's Pulp and Paper Sector, which comprised the businesses transferred to us by Kimberly-Clark in the spin-off. He served as the President of the Global Nonwoven business from early 2001. He has also served as the President of the European Consumer Tissue business, Managing Director of Kimberly-Clark Australia, as well as previously serving as President of the Pulp and Paper Sector, and President of the Technical Paper business. Mr. Erwin has served as a director of Neenah since November 30, 2004. Mr. Erwin's extensive experience as CEO of the Company and his vast industry experience and leadership positions make him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

        John F. McGovern, age 64, is the founder, and since 1999 a partner, of Aurora Capital LLC, a private investment and consulting firm based in Atlanta, Georgia. Prior to founding Aurora Capital, Mr. McGovern served in a number of positions of increasing responsibility at Georgia-Pacific Corporation from 1981 to 1999, including Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer from 1994 to 1999. Previously, Mr. McGovern had been Vice President and Director, Forest Products and Package Division of Chase Manhattan Bank. He currently serves as a director of Collective Brands Inc, and Xerium Technologies, Inc. where he serves as audit committee chairman. Mr. McGovern also served as a director of GenTek, Inc. from 2003 to 2009, and Maxim Crane Works Holdings, Inc. from 2005 to 2008. In 2006 the Board appointed Mr. McGovern to serve as lead director for all executive sessions of non-management directors. Mr. McGovern has served as a director of Neenah since January 10, 2006. Mr. McGovern received his BS from Fordham University. Mr. McGovern's extensive experience as the senior financial executive of a multi-national paper products company and his experience as an executive in the financial services industry as well as his experience on other public company boards make him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

        Edward Grzedzinski, age 55, served as the Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Information Systems from 1993 to 2001, and Vice Chairman of US Bancorp from November 2001 to 2004. Mr. Grzedzinski has over 25 years of experience in the electronic payments industry and was a co-founder of NOVA Information Systems in 1991. Mr. Grzedzinski served as a member of the Managing Committee of US Bancorp, and was a member of the Board of Directors of US Bank, N.A. Mr. Grzedzinski also served as Chairman of euroConex Technologies, Limited, a European payment processor owned by US Bancorp until November 2004 and was a member of the Board of Directors of Indus International, a global provider of enterprise asset management products and services until April 2005. Mr. Grzedzinski more recently has been named Chairman of the Board of Veracity Payments Solutions. Mr. Grzedzinski has served as a director of Marlin Business Services since May of 2005 and Neenah Paper since November 30, 2004. Mr. Grzedzinski's experience as chief executive officer and chairman of a financial services company and experience on other boards makes him an effective member of Neenah's Board.

11

---

Table of Contents

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the full Board and through committees of the Board, consisting of an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which we refer to as the Nominating Committee. During 2010 our Board held seven meetings, the Audit Committee held seven meetings, the Compensation Committee held six meetings and the Nominating Committee held four meetings. The Company's Corporate Governance Policies provide that all directors are expected to regularly attend and participate in Board and Committee meetings and encourage the directors to attend the Company's Annual Meeting. In 2010 all of our directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of which he or she is a member. Neenah holds regularly scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors. All of the Company's directors were in attendance at the 2010 Annual Meeting.

Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), and are financially literate, as required by NYSE rules. At least one member of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert, as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with applicable rules promulgated by the NYSE and SEC. The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring:

•

the quality and integrity of our financial statements;



•

our compliance with ethical policies contained in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and legal and regulatory requirements as well as administering our policy regarding related party transactions;



•

the independence, qualification and performance of our registered public accounting firm;



•

the performance of our internal auditors; and



•

related party transactions.

        The Audit Committee is governed by the Audit Committee Charter approved by the Board. The charter is available on our website at www.neenah.com.

        The members of the Audit Committee, which met seven times in 2010, are Messrs. Lucas (Chairperson), Moore and Dr. Wood. The Board has determined, based on his experience at the FASB, that Mr. Lucas is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the SEC's rules.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

        The Nominating Committee is comprised solely of directors who meet the NYSE independence requirements. The Nominating Committee:

•

oversees the process by which individuals are nominated to our Board;



•

reviews the qualifications, performance and independence of members of our Board;



•

reviews and recommends policies with respect to composition, organization, processes and practices of our Board, including diversity; and



•

identifies and investigates emerging corporate governance issues and trends that may affect us.

12

---

Table of Contents

        The Nominating Committee is governed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter approved by the Board. The charter is available on our website at www.neenah.com.

        The members of the Nominating Committee, which met four times in 2010, are Dr. Leeper (Chairperson), Messrs. McGovern and Grzedzinski.

Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of directors who meet NYSE independence requirements, meet the requirements for a "nonemployee director" under the Exchange Act, and meet the requirements for an "outside director" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Compensation Committee:

•

reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and sets such compensation;



•

approves, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, the compensation of our officers who are elected by our Board;



•

makes recommendations to our Board with respect to our equity-based plans and executive incentive-compensation plans; and



•

reviews with management and approves awards under our long-term incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans.

        The Compensation Committee is governed by the Compensation Committee Charter approved by the Board. The charter is available on our website at www.neenah.com.

        The members of the Compensation Committee, which met six times in 2010 are Messrs. Moore (Chairperson), McGovern and Dr. Wood.

        Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee's processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

13

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independent Directors & Board Structure

        Our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that a majority of the directors on our Board shall be independent. In addition, the Corporate Governance Policies adopted by the Board, described further below, provide for independence standards consistent with NYSE listing standards. Generally, a director does not qualify as an independent director if the director (or in some cases, members of the director's immediate family) has, or in the past three years has had, certain material relationships or affiliations with the Company, its external or internal auditors, or other companies that do business with the Company.

        The Board selects from among its members the Chairman of the Board. The Board also elects the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The Board believes that at this time it is appropriate for Sean T. Erwin to serve as the Chairman while John P. O'Donnell serves as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board. Mr. Erwin's position as Chairman and Mr. O'Donnell's position as both CEO and a Director provides a continuity of leadership between the senior executive team and the Board and enhances the corporate governance environment of the Board. The Company's Corporate Governance Policy also gives the Board the power to select a lead director. In 2006 the Board selected Mr. McGovern to serve as lead director and he continues in that capacity today. The Board regularly holds scheduled and non-scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors and Mr. McGovern will continue to lead those meetings. Having a lead director and six out of eight independent directors provides Neenah with a sufficient level of oversight, governance and independence without unduly limiting the senior executives from acting in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

        In evaluating the independence of our independent directors, the Board also considered whether any of the independent directors had any material relationships with Neenah and concluded that no such material relationship existed that would impair their independence. See "Approval of Related Party Transactions" below. In making this determination, the Board relied both on information provided by our directors as well as information developed internally by Neenah. As is currently the case, immediately after the election of the nominees to the Board of Directors, a majority of all directors holding office will be independent directors. The Nominating Committee and the Board have affirmatively determined that six of the Company's eight directors do not have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors and are independent in accordance with NYSE listing standards, SEC requirements and our Corporate Governance Policies. Neenah's independent directors are Mary Ann Leeper, Stephen M. Wood, John F. McGovern, Edward Grzedzinski, Timothy S. Lucas and Philip C. Moore.

Nomination of Directors

        The Board of Directors is responsible for approving candidates for Board membership. The Board has delegated the screening and recruitment process to the Nominating Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. More specifically, our Nominating Committee has adopted, and the Board has ratified, the "Neenah Paper, Inc. Policy Regarding Qualification and Nomination of Director Candidates."

        The Nominating Committee seeks to create a Board that is as a whole strong in its collective knowledge of, and diversity of skills and experience with respect to, accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, crisis management, risk assessment, industry knowledge, corporate governance, education, background and global markets.

        Qualified candidates for director are those who, in the judgment of the Nominating Committee, possess all of the following personal attributes and a sufficient mix of the following experience

14

---

Table of Contents

attributes to assure effective service on the Board. Personal attributes of a Board candidate considered by the Nominating Committee include: leadership, ethical nature, contributing nature, independence, interpersonal skills, and effectiveness. Experience attributes of a Board candidate considered by the Nominating Committee include: financial acumen, general business experience, industry knowledge, diversity of view-points, special business experience and expertise. When the Nominating Committee reviews a potential new candidate, the Nominating Committee looks specifically at the candidate's qualifications in light of the needs of the Board and our company at that time, given the then current mix of director attributes. Although the Company does not have a specific Board diversity policy, the Committee looks at the diversity of experience, background and Board composition in recommending director candidates as required by the Committee's charter.

        The Nominating Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating Committee periodically assesses the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected. In the event that vacancies are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Nominating Committee will seek to identify director candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including: (i) Nominating Committee members; (ii) other directors of Neenah; (iii) management of Neenah; and (iv) stockholders of Neenah. The Nominating Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in the identification of qualified director candidates.

        The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders as candidates for election to the Board. A stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting is required to give written notice to the Secretary of Neenah of his or her intention to make a nomination. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws, the notice of nomination must be received by Neenah not less than 50 days nor more than 75 days prior to the Annual Meeting, or if Neenah gives less than 60 days notice of the meeting date, the notice of nomination must be received within 10 days after the Annual Meeting date is announced.

        To recommend a nominee, a stockholder should write to Steven S. Heinrichs, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Neenah, at 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Preston Ridge III, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005. Any such recommendation must include:

•

the name and address of the stockholder and a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of shares of our common stock;



•

a brief biographical description for the nominee, including his or her name, age, business and residence addresses, occupation for at least the last five years, and a statement of the qualifications of the candidate, taking into account the qualification requirements set forth above;



•

a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee; and



•

the candidate's consent to serve as a director if elected.

        Once director candidates have been identified, the Nominating Committee will then evaluate each candidate in light of his or her qualifications and credentials and any additional factors that the Nominating Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including those set forth above. Qualified prospective candidates will be interviewed by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and at least one member of the Nominating Committee. The full Board will be kept informed of the candidate's progress. Using input from such interviews and other information obtained by the Nominating Committee, the Nominating Committee will evaluate whether a prospective candidate is qualified to serve as a director and, if so qualified, will seek full Board approval of the nomination of the candidate or the election of such candidate to fill a vacancy on the Board.

15

---

Table of Contents

        Existing directors who are being considered for re-nomination will be re-evaluated by the Nominating Committee based on each director's satisfaction of the qualifications described above and his or her performance as a director during the preceding year. All candidates submitted by stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner as candidates recommended from other sources, provided that the procedures set forth above have been followed.

        All of the current nominees for director are current members of the Board. Based on the Nominating Committee's evaluation of each nominee's satisfaction of the qualifications described above and their performance as directors in 2010, the Nominating Committee determined to recommend the three directors for re-election. The Nominating Committee has not received any nominations from stockholders for the Annual Meeting.

Corporate Governance Policies

        We have adopted the Neenah Paper, Inc. Corporate Governance Policies that guide the Company and the Board on matters of corporate governance, including director responsibilities, Board committees and their charters, director independence, director qualifications, director evaluations, director orientation and education, director access to management, Board access to independent advisors, and management development and succession planning. Copies of the Corporate Governance Policies are available on our website at www.neenah.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

        We have adopted the Neenah Paper, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics meets the requirements of a "code of ethics" as defined by SEC rules and regulations. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also meets the requirements of a code of conduct under NYSE listing standards. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.neenah.com.

Risk Oversight

        The Board participates in risk oversight through the Company's Enterprise Risk Evaluation conducted by our Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, in conjunction with the Company's senior management team. Annual findings are reported to the Audit Committee pursuant to the requirements of its charter and the full Board reviews an annual report of the findings as required by our Corporate Governance Policies.

Communications with the Board of Directors

        We have established a process for interested parties to communicate with members of the Board, including non-management members of the Board. If you have any concern, question or complaint regarding any accounting, auditing or internal controls matter, or any issue with regard to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or other matters that you wish to communicate to our Board or non-management directors, send these matters in writing to c/o General Counsel, Neenah Paper, Inc., Preston Ridge III, 3460 Preston Ridge Road, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005. Information about our Board communications policy and procedures for processing Board communications for all interested parties can be found on our website at www.neenah.com under the link "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Board of Directors—Board Communications Policy."

16

---

Table of Contents

Approval of Related Party Transactions

        The charter of the Audit Committee requires that the Audit Committee review and approve any transactions that would require disclosure under SEC rules and regulations. To help identify related party transactions and relationships, each director and named executive officer, as such term is used is "Additional Executive Compensation Information—2010 Summary Compensation Table," completes a questionnaire on an annual basis that requires the disclosure of any transaction or relationships that the person, or any member of his or her immediate family, has or will have with the Company. Additionally, the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics prohibits related party transactions and requires that any employee with knowledge of such a transaction provide written notice of the relationship or transaction to the Company's General Counsel. Neither Neenah nor the Board is aware of any matter in 2010 that required the review and approval of the Audit Committee in accordance with the terms of the charter.

17

---

Table of Contents

2010 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

        The Compensation Committee has responsibility for evaluating and making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding compensation for our nonemployee directors.

        Each of our directors who are not employees receives an annual cash retainer fee of $36,000 and is paid $1,500 for each Board and committee meeting attended. The chairperson of the Audit Committee is paid an additional $10,000 in cash per year, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional $7,500 in cash per year and the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is paid an additional $5,000 in cash per year. The Board's Lead Director also receives an additional $10,000 in cash per year. In addition to the cash compensation, to ensure that our directors will have an equity ownership interest aligned with our stockholders, we make annual awards of nonqualified stock options and/or restricted stock units under the Neenah Paper, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Omnibus Plan") to each nonemployee director. Non-employee directors may choose whether their equity compensation will consist of 100% restricted stock units ("RSUs") or 50% RSUs and 50% non-qualified stock options each year. In 2010 Mr. McGovern, Dr. Wood and Dr. Leeper elected to receive 100% RSUs, which grant was a total of 1,980 shares. The remaining three non-employee directors elected to receive 50% RSUs and 50% non-qualified stock options. Their grant consisted of 990 RSUs and 1,880 options, with an exercise price of $18.90 (which was the closing price of our common stock on May 19, 2010). The number of stock options and RSUs granted to nonemployee directors is calculated annually using a modified Black Scholes formula used to provide a total equity value equal to the annual retainer fee in the same manner as used to calculate grants for Company employees under the LTCP. The stock options become fully vested and exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The RSUs become fully vested and convert to shares of our common stock on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Employee directors receive no additional compensation and no perquisites for serving on our Board. In December of 2006, Neenah established the Neenah Paper Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Directors' Plan"), which enables each of our nonemployee directors to defer a portion of their cash compensation and RSU awards. In 2010 Mr. McGovern and Dr. Wood participated in the Director's Plan.

        The following table shows the total compensation paid to each of our nonemployee directors in 2010.

18

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        The following section presents an analysis, summary and overview of our compensation policies and programs, including material decisions made under those policies and programs in setting the compensation levels for 2010 for our "named executive officers" listed below. Following this section under the heading "Additional Executive Compensation Information" we have included certain tables where you will find detailed compensation information for the named executive officers. This section is intended to provide additional details regarding Neenah's compensation practices, as well as the information and process used to create and implement our compensation program for our named executive officers and our other executive officers.

Named Executive Officers

•

Sean T. Erwin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer



•

John P. O'Donnell, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer



•

Bonnie C. Lind, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



•

Steven S. Heinrichs, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary



•

Dennis P. Runsten, Senior Vice President, President-Technical Products US

Topics Covered

        Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the following topics:

•

Compensation objectives and philosophy;



•

Compensation setting process; and



•

The components of our executive compensation program and our compensation decisions for 2010.

Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

        Neenah's compensation policies are designed to accomplish the following key objectives:

•

Reward executives for long-term strategic management and enhancement of stockholder value;



•

Support a performance oriented work environment that rewards achievement of identified internal goals and recognizes the Company's performance against the performance of selected peer companies; and



•

Attract and retain leaders whose abilities are essential to Neenah's long-term success and competitiveness.

        We believe that executive compensation, both long-term and short-term, should be directly linked with performance. Our measures of performance are keyed off of individual responsibilities, Neenah's operational goals and the creation of shareholder value.

        Decisions made concerning the total compensation package for our executives take into consideration the individual executive's level of responsibility within Neenah and the performance of Neenah relative to peer companies. We strive to achieve a balanced and competitive compensation package through a mix of base salary, performance-based cash bonuses, long-term equity based incentives and awards, deferred compensation plans, pension plans and welfare benefits.

19

---

Table of Contents

Our Compensation-Setting Process

Role of Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee is responsible for carrying out the Board's responsibilities for determining the compensation for our named executive officers. In that capacity, the Compensation Committee (1) annually reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relating to our executive compensation programs; (2) evaluates performance against those goals and objectives; and (3) approves the compensation payable to our named executive officers.

Use of Compensation Consultants

        Neenah's management and the Compensation Committee each separately engage third- party compensation consultants to help them gather data and make informed decisions regarding compensation matters. In 2010, the consultant to management formerly with Hewitt Associates joined Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC ("Meridian"). Neenah retained Meridian to advise management and the Compensation Committee on developments relating to executive compensation generally, provide support to management and the Compensation Committee in their ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of Neenah's compensation policies and programs and review materials prepared by management related to benchmarking and plan designs.

        The Compensation Committee charter grants the Compensation Committee authority to independently retain compensation consultants, and in 2010 the Compensation Committee again engaged Hugessen Consulting Inc. ("Hugessen") to provide it with independent advice and assistance in its deliberations regarding compensation matters. Hugessen reviewed the information provided by Meridian and assisted the Compensation Committee in assessing 2010 compensation for Neenah's named executive officers. In addition, Hugessen provided input to assist the Compensation Committee in establishing the 2010 targeted compensation levels and performance criteria under the Company's incentive plans.

        The Compensation Committee must pre-approve any additional work of a material nature assigned to its consultants and will not approve any such work that, in its view, could compromise Hugessen's independence as advisor to the committee. Hugessen does not provide any other services to Neenah. Decisions made by the Compensation Committee are the responsibility of the Committee and reflect factors and considerations in addition to the information and recommendations provided by Hugessen.

Peer Comparison

        To assist in evaluating and determining levels of compensation in 2010 for each element of pay, the Compensation Committee reviewed various sources of data prepared by management and reviewed by Meridian including:

•

Proxy data collected and analyzed from a peer group of 10 companies in the pulp, paper and packaging industries similar in size to Neenah (the "Peer Group"). In 2010 the Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

20

---

Table of Contents

(1)

Amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value with respect to performance share units, restricted stock units and restricted stock granted pursuant to our Omnibus Plan, all disregarding any estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The amounts for 2010, 2009, and 2008 represent the grant date fair value of the awards on the date of the grant in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair value of the stock awards is equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. See Note 9 to the audited Financial Statement included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the assumptions used in valuing the performance share units.

(2)

Amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value with respect to stock options granted pursuant to our Omnibus Plan, disregarding any estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The amounts represent grant date fair value of the options on the date of the grant in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair value of the option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. See Note 9 to the audited Financial Statement included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the assumptions used in valuing the stock options.

(3)

Amounts shown reflect annual performance bonuses earned in the fiscal year and paid in the following year, and are described in detail in the portion of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, captioned "2010 Annual Performance Bonus Awards."

(4)

Amounts shown reflect the aggregate change during the year in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit under our Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan. The large variability in value year-to-year is caused, for the most part, by changes in the discount rates used to calculate the value from year to year, and not any increase or change in the pension plan for any individual named executive officer. Messrs. Heinrichs, Runsten and O'Donnell do not participate in any of the defined pension plans.

(5)

"All Other Compensation" includes Neenah's contribution to the 401(k) account of each of our named executive officers. The amounts shown for Messrs. Heinrichs, Runsten and O'Donnell also include Neenah's contribution to their accounts in the Retirement Contribution Plan and Supplemental Retirement Contribution Plan. The amounts shown for Mr. O'Donnell include tax preparation services in 2008. The amounts shown for Messrs. Erwin and Heinrichs and Ms. Lind include expenses for an annual physical. In addition, the Company paid tuition and travel expenses in 2008 for Mr. Heinrichs to obtain a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. These expenses are not included in the All Other Compensation Table and are not deemed to be income to Mr. Heinrichs.

(1)

Reflects the range of potential annual incentive bonus payments that could have been earned by each named executive officer under Neenah's MIP in 2010. The actual bonuses earned in 2010 are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above under the caption "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation." For more information regarding annual incentive bonus opportunities, see the discussion under "Determination of Appropriate Pay Levels—2010 MIP Payments" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

(2)

Reflects the range of potential performance share units that may be earned by each named executive officer, based on the Company's level of achievement of performance goals relating to earnings growth in 2010 and total shareholder return relative to a peer group for the performance period ending December 31, 2010. For more information regarding the performance share units, including how the number of performance share units awarded was determined and the vesting terms applicable to such units, see the discussion under "—Determination of Appropriate Pay Levels—2010 LTCP" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Outstanding restricted share units receive dividends at the same rate as other stockholders.

(3)

The stock options vest as to one-third of the shares on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.