Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to           

Commission File Number: 001-15491

KEMET CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2835 KEMET WAY, SIMPSONVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29681

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(864) 963-6300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES x  NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o YES  x NO

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of July 29, 2013 was 45,088,744.

Table of Contents

KEMET CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

KEMET CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

KEMET CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

KEMET CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

KEMET CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein are unaudited and have been prepared from the books and records of KEMET Corporation and its subsidiaries (“KEMET” or the “Company”). In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Although the Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the “Company’s 2013 Annual Report”).

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In consolidation, all significant intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated.  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.  Net sales and operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are presented in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments based on historical data and other assumptions that management believes are reasonable.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, they affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s judgments are based on management’s assessment as to the effect certain estimates, assumptions, or future trends or events may have on the financial condition and results of operations reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. It is important that readers of these unaudited financial statements understand that actual results could differ from these estimates, assumptions, and judgments.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting standards adopted

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  The ASU does not amend any existing requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements.  The ASU is effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after April 1, 2013.  The adoption of the ASU had no effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income or liquidity.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” which states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount. This provision is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. This accounting guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income or liquidity.

There are currently no other accounting standards that have been issued that will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows upon adoption.

Restricted Cash

As discussed in Note 2, Debt, the Company received a $24.0 million prepayment from an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and utilized $10.3 million for the purchase of manufacturing equipment; the remaining proceeds of $13.7 million are classified as restricted cash at June 30, 2013.

7

Table of Contents

A bank guarantee in the amount of EUR 1.5 million ($2.0 million) was issued by a European bank on behalf of the Company in August 2006 in conjunction with the establishment of a Value-Added Tax (“VAT”) registration in The Netherlands.  Accordingly, a deposit was placed with the European bank for EUR 1.7 million ($2.2 million). While the deposit is in KEMET’s name, and KEMET receives all interest earned by this deposit, the deposit is pledged to the European bank, and the bank can use the funds if a valid claim against the bank guarantee is made. The bank guarantee will remain valid until it is discharged by the beneficiary.

Fair Value Measurement

The Company utilizes three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of (a) nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The first two inputs are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable. The levels of inputs are as follows:

·                 Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

·                 Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

·                 Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

(1)             Included in the line item “Cash and cash equivalents” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2)             The valuation approach used to calculate fair value was a discounted cash flow for each respective debt facility.

(3)             See Note 5, Investment in NEC TOKIN, for a description of this net call derivative.  The value of the option is interrelated and depend on the enterprise value of NEC TOKIN Corporation and its EBITDA over time. Therefore, the derivative has been valued using option pricing methods in a Monte Carlo simulation.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  The components of inventories are as follows (amounts in thousands):

(1)         During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $3.9 million reserve for inventory held by a third party.

Warrant Liability

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, 8.4 million shares were subject to the warrant held by K Equity, LLC.

8

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The Company ships products to customers based upon firm orders and recognizes revenue when the sales process is complete.  This occurs when products are shipped to the customer in accordance with the terms of an agreement of sale, there is a fixed or determinable selling price, title and risk of loss have been transferred and collectability is reasonably assured.  Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales.

A portion of sales is related to products designed to meet customer specific requirements. These products typically have stricter tolerances making them useful to the specific customer requesting the product and to customers with similar or less stringent requirements. The Company recognizes revenue when title to the products transfers to the customer.

A portion of sales is made to distributors under agreements allowing certain rights of return, inventory price protection, and “ship-from-stock and debit” (“SFSD”) programs common in the industry.

The SFSD program provides a mechanism for the distributor to meet a competitive price after obtaining authorization from the Company’s local sales office. This program allows the distributor to ship its higher-priced inventory and debit the Company for the difference between KEMET’s list price and the lower authorized price for that specific transaction. Management analyzes historical SFSD activity to determine the SFSD exposure on the global distributor inventory at the balance sheet date.  The establishment of these reserves is recognized as a component of the line item “Net sales” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, while the associated reserves are included in the line item “Accounts receivable, net” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Estimates used in determining sales allowances are subject to various factors including, but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, pricing changes, product demand, inventory levels in the supply chain, the effects of technological change, and other variables that might result in changes to our estimates.

The Company provides a limited warranty to customers that the Company’s products meet certain specifications. The warranty period is generally limited to one year, and the Company’s liability under the warranty is generally limited to a replacement of the product or refund of the purchase price of the product. Warranty costs as a percentage of net sales were 1% or less for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company recognizes warranty costs when they are both probable and reasonably estimable.

Note 2. Debt

A summary of debt is as follows (amounts in thousands):

9

Table of Contents

The line item “Interest expense” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

Advanced Payment from OEM

On August 28, 2012, the Company entered into and amended an agreement (the “Agreement”) with an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”), pursuant to which the OEM agreed to advance the Company $24.0 million (the “Advance Payment”).  As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Company had $23.7 million and $24.0 million, respectively, outstanding to the OEM.  On a monthly basis starting in June 2013, the Company began repaying the OEM an amount equal to a percentage of the aggregate purchase price of the capacitors sold to the OEM the preceding month, not to exceed $1.0 million per month.  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the percentage of the aggregate purchase price of capacitors sold to the OEM that will be used to repay the Advance Payment will double, not to exceed $2.0 million per month, in the event that (1) the OEM provides evidence that the price charged by KEMET for a particular capacitor during any prior quarter was equal to or greater than 110% of the price paid by the OEM or its affiliates for a third-party part qualified for the same product, and shipping in volume during such period, and (2) agreement cannot be reached between the OEM and the Company for a price adjustment during the current quarter which would bring KEMET’s price within 110% of the third-party price.  In June 2015, the outstanding balance, if any, is due in full.  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company delivered to the OEM an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $16.0 million on October 8, 2012 and on October 22, 2012, the Company received the Advance Payment from the OEM.

The OEM may demand repayment of the entire balance outstanding or draw upon the Letter of Credit if any of the following events occur while the Agreement is still in effect: (i) the Company commits a material breach of the Agreement, the statement of work or the master purchase agreement between the OEM and the Company; (ii) the Company’s credit rating issued by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its successor or Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. or its successors drops below CCC+ or Caa1, respectively; (iii) the Company’s cash balance on the last day of any fiscal quarter is less than $60,000,000; (iv) the Letter of Credit has been terminated without being replaced prior to repayment of the Advance Payment amount; (v) the Company or substantially all of its assets are sold to a party other than a subsidiary of the Company; (vi) all or substantially all of the assets of a subsidiary of the Company, or any of the shares of such subsidiary, are sold, whose assets are used to develop and produce the Goods; (vii) the Company or any subsidiary which accounts for 20% or more of the Company’s consolidated total assets (“Company Entity”) applies for judicial or extra judicial settlement with its creditors, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, voluntarily files for bankruptcy or has a receiver or trustee in bankruptcy appointed by reason of its insolvency, or in the event of an involuntary bankruptcy action, liquidation proceeding, dissolution or similar proceeding is filed against a Company Entity and not dismissed within sixty (60) days.  The Company believes none of these triggers have been met since the Company’s cash balance including restricted cash exceeds the $60.0 million threshold.

10.5% Senior Notes

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding $355.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 10.5% Senior Notes due May 1, 2018 (the “10.5% Senior Notes”).  The Company had interest payable related to the 10.5% Senior Notes included in the line “Accrued expenses” on its Condensed Consolidated balance sheets of $6.2 million and $15.6 million at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively.

Revolving Line of Credit

KEMET Electronics Corporation (“KEC”) and KEMET Electronics Marketing (S) Pte Ltd. (“KEMET Singapore”) (each a “Borrower” and, collectively, the “Borrowers”) entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement which provides a $50 million revolving line of credit.  A portion of the U.S. facility and of the Singapore facility can be used to issue letters of credit.  The facilities expire on September 30, 2014.

As described above under Advance Payment from OEM, a standby letter of credit for $16.0 million was delivered to the OEM on October 8, 2012 which reduced the Company’s availability under the Loan and Security Agreement.  In the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company issued a letter of credit for EUR 1.1 million ($1.4 million) related to the construction of the new

10

Table of Contents

manufacturing location in Italy which reduced the Company’s availability under the Loan and Security Agreement.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s borrowing capacity under the revolving line of credit was $23.7 million.

Note 3. Restructuring Charges

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company initiated the first phase of a plan to restructure the Film and Electrolytic Business Group (“Film and Electrolytic”) and to reduce overhead within the Company as a whole. Since that time the restructuring plan has been expanded to all business groups and includes implementing programs to make the Company more competitive by removing excess capacity, moving production to lower cost locations and eliminating unnecessary costs throughout the Company.

A summary of the expenses aggregated on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations line item “Restructuring charges” in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Quarter ended June 30, 2013

In the quarter ended June 30, 2013 restructuring charges included personnel reduction costs of $4.1 million and manufacturing relocation costs of $0.5 million.  The personnel reduction costs were comprised of the following: $1.9 million related to the closure of a portion of our innovation center in the U.S., $1.1 million related to a reduction of solid capacitor production workforce in Mexico, $0.7 million related to the Company’s initiative to reduce overhead within the Company as a whole and $0.4 million related to an additional Cassia Integrazione Guadagni Straordinaria (“CIGS”) plan in Italy.  The additional expense related to CIGS is an agreement with the labor union which allowed the Company to place up to 170 workers, on a rotation basis, on the CIGS plan to save labor costs. CIGS is a temporary plan to save labor costs whereby a company may temporarily “lay off” employees while the government continues to pay their wages for a maximum of 12 months for the program. The employees who are in CIGS are not working, but are still employed by the Company. Only employees that are not classified as management or executive level personnel can participate in the CIGS program. Upon termination of the plan, the affected employees return to work.

In addition to these personnel reduction costs, the Company incurred manufacturing relocation costs of $0.5 million for the consolidation of manufacturing operations within Italy and relocation of equipment to Evora, Portugal.

Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

Restructuring charges in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 were primarily comprised of termination benefits associated with converting the Weymouth, United Kingdom manufacturing facility into a technology center.  In addition to these personnel reduction costs, the Company incurred manufacturing relocation costs of $0.2 million for relocation of equipment to China and Macedonia.

11

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of restructuring liability

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances for restructuring charges included in the line items “Accrued expenses” and “Other non-current obligations” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Note 4. Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 includes the following components (amounts in thousands):

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 includes the following components (amounts in thousands):

(1) Due primarily to the Company’s permanent re-investment assertion relating to foreign earnings, there was no significant deferred   tax effect associated with the cumulative currency translation gains and losses during the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

(2)   Ending balance is net of tax of $2.3 million and $2.6 million as of June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.

Note 5. Investment in NEC TOKIN

On March 12, 2012, KEMET Electronics Corporation (“KEC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) to acquire 51% of the common stock (which represents a 34% economic interest) of NEC TOKIN Corporation (“NEC TOKIN”), a manufacturer of tantalum capacitors, electro-magnetic, electro-mechanical and access devices, (the “Initial Purchase”) from NEC Corporation (“NEC”) of Japan. The transaction closed on February 1, 2013, at which time KEC paid a purchase price of $50.0 million for new shares of common stock of NEC TOKIN (the “Initial Closing”). The Company accounts for the equity investment using the equity method in a non-consolidated variable interest entity since KEC does not have the power to direct significant activities of NEC TOKIN.

12

Table of Contents

In connection with KEC’s execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement, KEC entered into a Stockholders’ Agreement (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”) with NEC TOKIN and NEC, which provides for restrictions on transfers of NEC TOKIN’s capital stock, certain tag-along and first refusal rights on transfer, restrictions on NEC’s ability to convert the preferred stock of NEC TOKIN held by it, certain management services to be provided to NEC TOKIN by KEC (or an affiliate of KEC) and certain board representation rights. KEC holds four of seven NEC TOKIN director positions. However, NEC has significant board rights.

Concurrent with execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement and the Stockholders’ Agreement, KEC entered into an Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with NEC whereby KEC may purchase additional shares of NEC TOKIN common stock from NEC TOKIN for a purchase price of $50.0 million resulting in an economic interest of approximately 49% while maintaining ownership of 51% of NEC TOKIN’s common stock (the “First Call Option”) by providing notice of the First Call Option between the Initial Closing and August 31, 2014. Upon providing such notice, but not before August 1, 2014, KEC may also exercise an option to purchase all outstanding capital stock of NEC TOKIN from its stockholders, primarily NEC, for a purchase price based on the greater of six times LTM EBITDA (as defined in the Option Agreement) less the previous payments and certain other adjustments, or the outstanding amount of NEC TOKIN’s debt obligation to NEC (the “Second Call Option”) by providing notice of the Second Call Option by May 31, 2018. From August 1, 2014 through May 31, 2018, NEC may require KEC to purchase all outstanding capital stock of NEC TOKIN from its stockholders, primarily NEC. However, NEC may only exercise this right (the “Put Option”) from August 1, 2014 through April 1, 2016 if NEC TOKIN achieves certain financial performance measures. The purchase price for the Put Option will be based on the greater of six times LTM EBITDA less previous payments and certain other adjustments, or the outstanding amount of NEC TOKIN’s debt obligation to NEC as of the date the Put Option is exercised. The purchase price for the Put Option is reduced by the amount of NEC TOKIN’s debt obligation to NEC which KEC will assume. The determination of the purchase price will be modified in the event there is an unresolved agreement between NEC and KEC under the Stockholders’ Agreement. In the event the Put Option is exercised, NEC will be required to maintain in place the outstanding debt obligation owed by NEC TOKIN to NEC. The Company valued these options as a net call derivative of $0.5 million which is included in line item “Other Assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

KEC’s total investment in NEC TOKIN including the net call derivative described above on February 1, 2013 was $54.5 million which includes $50.0 million cash consideration plus approximately $4.5 million in transaction expenses (fees for legal, accounting, due diligence, investment banking and other various services necessary to complete the transactions). The Company has made a preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price, which are based upon estimates that the Company believes are reasonable and are subject to revision as additional information becomes available.

Summarized financial information for NEC TOKIN follows (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2013, the excess of the carrying value for its investment in NEC TOKIN over KEMET’s share of NEC TOKIN’s equity is $16.1 million. As of June 30, 2013, KEC’s maximum loss exposure as a result of its investments in NEC TOKIN is limited to the aggregate of the carrying value of the investment and any accounts receivable balance due from NEC TOKIN.

Note 6. Segment and Geographic Information

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company reorganized its business by combining its Tantalum Business Group and Ceramic Business Group into one business group, Solid Capacitors.  Following the reorganization, based on information regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, KEMET’s two business groups are comprised of: the Solid Capacitors Business

13

Table of Contents

Group (“Solid Capacitors”) and the Film and Electrolytic Business Group (“Film and Electrolytic”).  These business groups are responsible for their respective manufacturing sites as well as all related research and development efforts.

Consistent with management reporting, the Company does not allocate indirect Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) and Research and development (“R&D”) expenses to the business groups.  Prior period information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Solid Capacitors

Operating in ten manufacturing sites in the United States, Mexico, China and Portugal, Solid Capacitors primarily produces tantalum, aluminum polymer and ceramic capacitors which are sold globally.  Solid Capacitors also produces tantalum powder used in the production of tantalum capacitors and has a product innovation center in the United States.

Film and Electrolytic

Film and Electrolytic operates fourteen manufacturing sites throughout Europe, Asia, and the United States and produces film, paper, and electrolytic capacitors which are sold globally. Film and Electrolytic also manufactures etched foils utilized as a core component in the manufacture of electrolytic capacitors and operates a machinery division located in Italy that provides automation solutions for the manufacture, processing and assembly of metalized films, film/foil and electrolytic capacitors; and designs, assembles and installs automation solutions for the production of energy storage devices. In addition, this business group has product innovation centers in the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and Sweden.

The following table reflects each business group’s net sales, operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization expenses and sales by region for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):

(1)          Restructuring charges included in Operating income (loss) are as follows (amounts in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

The following table reflects each business group’s total assets as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 (amounts in thousands):

Note 7.  Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors six defined benefit pension plans in Europe, one plan in Singapore and two plans in Mexico.  In addition, the Company sponsors a post-retirement plan in the United States.  Costs recognized for these benefit plans are recorded using estimated amounts which may change as actual costs for the fiscal year are determined.

The components of net periodic benefit (income) costs relating to the Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans are as follows for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):

In fiscal year 2014, the Company expects to contribute up to $1.6 million to the pension plans, of which the Company has contributed $0.3 million as of June 30, 2013.  The Company’s policy is to pay benefits as costs are incurred for the postretirement benefit plan.

Note 8. Stock-based Compensation

Historically, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved annual Long Term Incentive Plans which cover two year periods and are primarily based upon the achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA target for the two-year period. At the time of the award, the individual plans entitle the participants to receive cash or restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of both as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The 2014/2015 LTIP and 2013/2014 LTIP also awarded restricted stock shares which vest over the course of three years from the anniversary of the establishment of the plan and are not subject to a performance metric. The Company assesses the likelihood of meeting the Adjusted EBITDA financial metric on a quarterly basis and adjusts compensation expense to match expectations. Any related liability is reflected in the line item “Accrued expenses” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and any restricted stock commitment is reflected in the line item “Additional paid-in capital” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

15

Table of Contents

The compensation expense associated with stock-based compensation for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows (amounts in thousands):

In the “Operating activities” section of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, stock-based compensation expense was treated as an adjustment to Net income (loss) for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Approximately six thousand and twenty-one thousand stock options were exercised in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 9. Income Taxes

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company incurred $1.6 million of income tax expense which is comprised of $1.5 million related to income taxes for foreign operations and $0.1 million of state income tax expense.  There is no U.S. federal income tax benefit from the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 loss due to a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company incurred $1.8 million of income tax expense which was comprised of $1.7 million related to income taxes for foreign operations and $0.1 million of state income tax expense.  There was no U.S. federal income tax benefit from the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 loss due to a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

Note 10. Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic EPS to diluted EPS (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

Common stock equivalents that could potentially dilute net loss per basic share in the future, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the impact would have been antidilutive, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Note 11. Concentrations of Risks

The Company sells to customers globally.  Monthly the Company evaluates customer account balances in order to assess the Company’s financial risks of collection as the Company generally does not require collateral from its customers.  Two customers each accounted for over 10% of the Company’s net sales in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and one customer accounted for over 10% of

16

Table of Contents

the Company’s net sales in the quarter ended June 30, 2012.  There were no customers’ accounts receivable balances exceeding 10% of gross accounts receivable at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013.

Electronics distributors are an important distribution channel in the electronics industry and accounted for 46% of the Company’s net sales in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  As a result of the Company’s concentration of sales to electronics distributors, the Company may experience fluctuations in the Company’s operating results as electronics distributors experience fluctuations in end-market demand or adjust their inventory stocking levels.

Note 12. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

The 10.5% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior basis by certain of the Company’s 100% owned domestic subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”) and secured by a first priority lien on 51% of the capital stock of certain of our foreign restricted subsidiaries (“Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”).  The Company’s Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are not consistent with the Company’s business groups or geographic operations; accordingly this basis of presentation is not intended to present the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows for any purpose other than to comply with the specific requirements for subsidiary guarantor reporting. The Company is required to present condensed consolidating financial information in order for the subsidiary guarantors of the Company’s public debt to be exempt from reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Condensed consolidating financial statements for the Company’s Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are presented in the following tables (amounts in thousands):

17

Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

June 30, 2013

(Unaudited)