UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-31400
CACI International Inc
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 54-1345888 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(703) 841-7800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of Common Stock, as of May 3, 2010: CACI International Inc Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 30,236,424 shares.
PAGE | ||||
PART I: | ||||
Item 1. | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 |
5 | |||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
8 | |||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
25 | ||
Item 3. | 33 | |||
Item 4. | 34 | |||
PART II: | ||||
Item 1. | 35 | |||
Item 1A. | 37 | |||
Item 2. | 37 | |||
Item 3. | 37 | |||
Item 4. | 37 | |||
Item 5. | 37 | |||
Item 6. | 38 | |||
39 |
2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||
Revenue |
$ | 784,169 | $ | 673,994 | ||||
Costs of revenue: |
||||||||
Direct costs |
551,191 | 461,757 | ||||||
Indirect costs and selling expenses |
171,451 | 155,445 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,205 | 11,818 | ||||||
Total costs of revenue |
736,847 | 629,020 | ||||||
Income from operations |
47,322 | 44,974 | ||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
6,488 | 7,538 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
40,834 | 37,436 | ||||||
Income taxes |
14,055 | 15,356 | ||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
26,779 | 22,080 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
(71 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | 26,708 | $ | 21,972 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.89 | $ | 0.73 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.72 | ||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
30,171 | 29,939 | ||||||
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
30,641 | 30,410 | ||||||
( 1 ) | Certain amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||
Revenue |
$ | 2,300,414 | $ | 2,001,261 | ||||
Costs of revenue: |
||||||||
Direct costs |
1,604,848 | 1,366,790 | ||||||
Indirect costs and selling expenses |
515,849 | 467,297 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
38,906 | 35,633 | ||||||
Total costs of revenue |
2,159,603 | 1,869,720 | ||||||
Income from operations |
140,811 | 131,541 | ||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
20,874 | 23,699 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
119,937 | 107,842 | ||||||
Income taxes |
42,973 | 45,141 | ||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
76,964 | 62,701 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
(349 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | 76,615 | $ | 62,214 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.55 | $ | 2.08 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.51 | $ | 2.04 | ||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
30,104 | 29,979 | ||||||
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
30,561 | 30,446 | ||||||
( 1 ) | Certain amounts for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
March
31, 2010 |
June
30, 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 174,747 | $ | 208,488 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
524,207 | 477,025 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
57,400 | 39,319 | ||||||
Total current assets |
756,354 | 724,832 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,163,416 | 1,083,750 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
118,123 | 97,829 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
59,650 | 30,923 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, long-term, net |
6,767 | 8,677 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
66,361 | 60,068 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,170,671 | $ | 2,006,079 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 2,972 | $ | 9,464 | ||||
Accounts payable |
82,041 | 87,300 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
149,150 | 137,843 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities |
115,673 | 83,297 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
349,836 | 317,904 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
526,187 | 570,078 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
44,241 | 29,266 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
120,607 | 59,223 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,040,871 | 976,471 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock $0.10 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock $0.10 par value, 80,000 shares authorized, 39,350 and 39,091 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
3,935 | 3,909 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
455,444 | 425,993 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
764,377 | 687,762 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(9,351 | ) | (3,248 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture |
2,048 | 1,875 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (9,117 and 9,118 shares, respectively) |
(86,653 | ) | (86,683 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
1,129,800 | 1,029,608 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 2,170,671 | $ | 2,006,079 | ||||
( 1 ) | Certain balances as of June 30, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands)
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
$ | 76,964 | $ | 62,701 | ||||
Reconciliation of net income before noncontrolling interest to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
38,906 | 35,633 | ||||||
Non-cash interest expense |
7,811 | 7,299 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,819 | 1,681 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
17,950 | 13,084 | ||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
(2,076 | ) | 9,457 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of business acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(41,737 | ) | (31,045 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(11,517 | ) | 3,133 | |||||
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
19,672 | 4,554 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
4,888 | (6,208 | ) | |||||
Income taxes payable and receivable |
(2,245 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
12,512 | (5,676 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
122,947 | 94,288 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(20,519 | ) | (9,080 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(88,059 | ) | (8,787 | ) | ||||
Other |
945 | 502 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(107,633 | ) | (17,365 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Principal payments made under bank credit facilities |
(52,857 | ) | (3,672 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans |
3,658 | 4,668 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
5,455 | 2,069 | ||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(2,610 | ) | (22,798 | ) | ||||
Other |
(56 | ) | (961 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(46,410 | ) | (20,694 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(2,645 | ) | (2,318 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(33,741 | ) | 53,911 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
208,488 | 120,396 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 174,747 | $ | 174,307 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds |
$ | 50,948 | $ | 35,583 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 9,143 | $ | 13,704 | ||||
Non-cash financing and investing activities: |
||||||||
Landlord-financed leasehold improvements |
$ | 16,545 | $ | 4,016 | ||||
( 1 ) | Certain amounts for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
$ | 26,779 | $ | 22,080 | $ | 76,964 | $ | 62,701 | ||||||||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment |
(4,871 | ) | (1,075 | ) | (7,101 | ) | (18,165 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of changes in actuarial assumptions and recognition of prior service cost under Accounting Standards Codification 715-30 |
| | (47 | ) | | |||||||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net |
| 336 | 1,045 | (617 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 21,908 | $ | 21,341 | $ | 70,861 | $ | 43,919 | ||||||||
( 1 ) | Certain amounts for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries (CACI or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and joint ventures that are more than 50 percent owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
These notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain references to various standards of U.S. GAAP that are based on a new nomenclature instituted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB). In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which defines authoritative GAAP for nongovernmental entities to be comprised only of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) and, for SEC registrants, guidance issued by the SEC. This new standard states that effective July 1, 2009 the Codification became the authoritative source of U.S. GAAP and superseded all then existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The Company adopted the provisions of this new standard effective July 1, 2009, and has changed the referencing conventions of GAAP in the notes to these financial statements. Accordingly, the notes contain references to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topics and Accounting Standard Updates (ASUs).
Certain amounts presented for prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of two FASB updates to accounting standards. Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted updates to ASC 470-20, Debt With Conversion and Other Options, (ASC 470-20) and updates to ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810). These updates, which relate to convertible debt instruments and noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, respectively, both require retrospective application. The FASB issued the updates to ASC 470-20 in May 2008, and the updates to ASC 810 in December 2007. The impacts to the Companys financial position and results of operations are presented in Note 2.
Under ASC 855, Subsequent Events, the Company is required to carefully assess the existence or occurrence of any events occurring after March 31, 2010 that may require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010. The Company has evaluated all events and transactions that occurred after March 31, 2010, and found that during this period it did not have any subsequent events requiring recognition.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt under its bank credit facilities is estimated by discounting the future cash flows at rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by the Companys lenders. The fair value of this long-term debt approximates its carrying value at March 31, 2010. The fair value of the Companys $300.0 million of 2.125 percent convertible senior subordinated notes issued May 16, 2007 and that mature on May 16, 2014 (the Notes) is based on quoted market prices.
8
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications (all of which are of a normal, recurring nature) that are necessary for fair presentation for the periods presented. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys latest annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the full fiscal year.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of ASC 470-20 and ASC 810
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of updates to ASC 470-20 and ASC 810.
ASC 470-20 governs the accounting for convertible debt with cash settlement options and accordingly applies to the Companys convertible debt. Under this new standard, the Company separately accounts for the liability and equity (conversion option) components of the Notes, and recognizes interest expense on the Notes using an interest rate in effect for comparable debt instruments that do not contain conversion features. The effective interest rate used under the new standard, 6.9 percent, is significantly higher than the coupon rate of 2.125 percent previously used to record interest expense.
Based on the effective rate of 6.9 percent, the fair value of the liability component of the Notes at May 16, 2007 was measured at $221.9 million, and has been reflected as the carrying amount of the Notes at issuance. The $78.1 million difference between the recast initial carrying amount and the $300.0 million of gross proceeds is accounted for as an unamortized debt discount that is recognized over the seven year term of the Notes as a non-cash component of interest expense. This difference also represents the fair value of the embedded conversion option. This amount, net of the income tax effect of $30.7 million as of the date of issue, has been recorded within shareholders equity as additional paid-in capital. The income tax effect of $30.7 million has been retroactively recognized as a long-term deferred tax liability as of May 16, 2007. This deferred tax liability is netted against the deferred tax asset of $32.8 million associated with the original issue discount originally recorded as of May 16, 2007. Under the revised provisions of ASC 470-20, the Company also reclassified, as of the date of issue, approximately $2.0 million of the Notes issuance costs from other long-term assets to additional paid-in capital, and recognized a deferred tax asset of $0.8 million related to this reclassification.
The updates to ASC 470-20 have the effect of significantly increasing interest expense with the amortization of the debt discount. Income tax expense decreases by the incremental benefit related to the increased interest expense, and net income and basic and diluted earnings per share decrease due to the after-tax effect of the incremental interest expense. The adoption of the updates to ASC 470-20 caused net income attributable to CACI and diluted earnings per share to decrease by $1.7 million and $0.06 per share and $4.9 million and $0.16 per share, respectively, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively.
While there is no effect on operating or total cash flows, certain amounts within the cash flows from operating activities are retroactively adjusted to reflect the impact of changes to ASC 470-20 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
The retroactive effects of the ASC 470-20 updates on the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2009, and on the results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009, are shown in the tables below. Current period balances related to the convertible debt and interest expense thereon are described in Note 7.
The updates to ASC 810 establish new accounting and reporting standards for 1) noncontrolling ownership interests in subsidiaries, 2) the amount of consolidated net income (loss) attributable to the Company and to the noncontrolling interests, 3) changes in the Companys ownership interest and 4) the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810 also establishes additional reporting requirements that identify and distinguish between the ownership interest of the Company and that of the noncontrolling owners.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 810, the Company retrospectively reclassified the Minority interest in joint venture balance associated with its investment in eVenture Technology, LLC (eVentures) previously included in Other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet to a new component of shareholders equity entitled Noncontrolling interest in joint venture. In the Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009,
9
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
the Company retrospectively included the minority interest in earnings of the joint venture within its consolidated net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture, and deducted the same amount to derive net income attributable to CACI.
The impact of the updates to ASC 470-20 and ASC 810 on the Companys results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Effects of Retroactively Adopting Accounting Standard Updates to: |
|||||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
ASC 470-20 | ASC 810 | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
$ | 5,241 | $ | 2,405 | $ | (108 | ) | $ | 7,538 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 39,733 | $ | (2,405 | ) | $ | 108 | $ | 37,436 | ||||||
Income taxes |
16,301 | (945 | ) | | 15,356 | ||||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
$ | 23,432 | $ | (1,460 | ) | $ | 108 | $ | 22,080 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
| (108 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | (1,460 | ) | $ | | $ | 21,972 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.78 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | | $ | 0.73 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.77 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | | $ | 0.72 | ||||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
29,939 | | | 29,939 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
30,410 | | | 30,410 | |||||||||||
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Effects of Retroactively Adopting Accounting Standard Updates to: |
|||||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
ASC 470-20 | ASC 810 | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
$ | 17,103 | $ | 7,083 | $ | (487 | ) | $ | 23,699 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 114,438 | $ | (7,083 | ) | $ | 487 | $ | 107,842 | ||||||
Income taxes |
47,923 | (2,782 | ) | | 45,141 | ||||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
$ | 66,515 | $ | (4,301 | ) | $ | 487 | $ | 62,701 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
| (487 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | (4,301 | ) | $ | | $ | 62,214 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.22 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | | $ | 2.08 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.18 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | | $ | 2.04 | ||||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
29,979 | | | 29,979 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
30,446 | | | 30,446 | |||||||||||
10
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
The impact of the updates to ASC 470-20 and ASC 810 on the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
As of June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Effects of Retroactively
Adopting Accounting Standard Updates to: |
||||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
ASC 470-20 | ASC 810 | As Adjusted | |||||||||||
Asset accounts: |
||||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
$ | 20,672 | $ | (1,395 | ) | $ | | $ | 19,277 | |||||
Total assets |
2,007,474 | (1,395 | ) | | 2,006,079 | |||||||||
Liability accounts: |
||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
628,125 | (58,047 | ) | | 570,078 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,019 | 22,247 | | 29,266 | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
20,800 | | (1,875 | ) | 18,925 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,014,146 | (35,800 | ) | (1,875 | ) | 976,471 | ||||||||
Shareholders equity accounts: |
||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
379,783 | 46,210 | | 425,993 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings |
699,567 | (11,805 | ) | | 687,762 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture |
| | 1,875 | 1,875 | ||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
993,328 | 34,405 | 1,875 | 1,029,608 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
2,007,474 | (1,395 | ) | | 2,006,079 |
The impact of the updates to ASC 470-20 and ASC 810 on the Companys statement of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Effects of Retroactively Adopting Accounting Standard Updates to: |
||||||||||||||||
As Previously Reported |
ASC 470-20 | ASC 810 | As Adjusted | |||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income before non-controlling interests |
$ | 66,515 | $ | (4,301 | ) | $ | 487 | $ | 62,701 | |||||||
Non-cash interest expense |
| 7,299 | | 7,299 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,897 | (216 | ) | | 1,681 | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
12,239 | (2,782 | ) | | 9,457 | |||||||||||
Changes in other liabilities |
(5,027 | ) | | (649 | ) | (5,676 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
94,450 | | (162 | ) | 94,288 | |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other activities |
(1,123 | ) | | 162 | (961 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(20,856 | ) | | 162 | (20,694 | ) |
Other New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805, Business Combinations. ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how companies recognize and measure identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in connection with a business combination; recognize and measure the goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determine what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. For CACI, ASC 805 is effective for business combinations completed on or after July 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 805 did not affect the Companys financial position or its results of operations.
11
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
In February 2008, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This update amended ASC 820 to delay the effective date for the fair valuation of non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. For items within its scope, the update deferred the effective date of the fair value measurement to the start of the Companys current fiscal year, or July 1, 2009. The Company has assessed the impact of this update for its non-financial assets and liabilities and determined that there was no material impact.
In April 2008, the FASB issued updates to ASC 350-30-35, General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill-Subsequent Measurement, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The Companys adoption of these updates, which became effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009, did not affect its financial position or its results of operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued updates to ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging, Contracts in Entitys Own Equity (ASC 815-40). ASC 815-40 provides guidance on how a company should determine if certain financial instruments (or embedded features) are considered indexed to its own stock, including instruments similar to the conversion option of the Notes, convertible note hedges, and warrants to purchase Company stock. This standard requires that a two-step approach be used to evaluate an instruments contingent exercise provisions and settlement provisions in determining whether the instrument is considered to be indexed to its own stock, and exempt from the application of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). The Company adopted the updates to ASC 815-40 effective July 1, 2009. The Company evaluated its financial instruments and embedded instrument features and determined that they are excluded from the provisions of ASC 815. Accordingly, the adoption of this new standard had no effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
In December 2008, the FASB issued updates to ASC 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits (ASC 715). This new standard requires detailed disclosures about investment strategies, fair value measurements and concentrations of risk regarding plan assets of a companys defined benefit plan or other postretirement plan. The updates to ASC 715 are effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009, and the Company will provide the required disclosures in its annual financial statement for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.
In June 2009, the FASB issued updates to ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810). These ASC 810 updates amend the accounting standards pertaining to the consolidation of certain variable interest entities, and when and how to determine, or re-determine, whether an entity is a variable interest entity. In addition, ASC 810 replaces the quantitative approach for determining who has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with a qualitative approach, and requires ongoing assessments of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The updates to ASC 810 are effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2010. CACI is currently evaluating the impact these updates may have on the Companys financial statements and does not expect the impact, if any, to be material.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13) which amends ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. This accounting update establishes a hierarchy for determining the value of each element within a multiple deliverable arrangement. ASU 2009-13 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2010 and applies to arrangements entered into on or after this date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2009-13 may have on its financial position and results of operations, and does not expect the impact, if any, to be material.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14), which updates ASC Topic 985, Software. ASU 2009-14 clarifies which accounting guidance should be used for purposes of measuring and allocating revenue for arrangements that contain both tangible products and software, and where the software is more than incidental to the tangible product as a whole. ASU 2009-14 is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and applies to arrangements entered into on or after this date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2009-14 may have on its financial position and results of operations, and does not expect the impact, if any, to be material.
3. Acquisitions
During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the Company completed three acquisitions: (1) a business in the United Kingdom which builds complex transactional websites for commercial clients, (2) a business in the United States which provides commercial security technology services and (3) a business in the United States which provides signal acquisition and analysis systems for cyber security and counterintelligence applications. The total consideration paid at
12
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
closing for these three businesses was approximately $88.1 million. In addition, the Company may be required to pay additional consideration of up to a total of approximately $49.0 million based upon events to occur subsequent to the acquisition dates. The Company has recognized estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including recognizing a liability for the fair value of the potential additional consideration, and has preliminarily allocated approximately $84 million to goodwill and $48 million to other intangible assets, primarily acquired technology, computer software, and customer relationships. The Company is in the process of finalizing its detailed valuations. The final results of the valuations may differ from managements estimates currently recorded and the balances will be adjusted to reflect the final results. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the acquired businesses generated approximately $38.5 million of revenue from the dates of acquisition through March 31, 2010.
4. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following (cost approximates fair value) (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 | |||||
Money market funds |
$ | 52,449 | $ | 206,374 | ||
Cash |
122,298 | 2,114 | ||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 174,747 | $ | 208,488 | ||
5. Accounts Receivable
Total accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.1 million at March 31, 2010 and $3.5 million at June 30, 2009, consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 | |||||
Billed receivables |
$ | 401,753 | $ | 384,421 | ||
Billable receivables at end of period |
80,411 | 71,341 | ||||
Unbilled receivables pending receipt of contractual documents authorizing billing |
42,043 | 21,263 | ||||
Total accounts receivable, current |
524,207 | 477,025 | ||||
Unbilled receivables, retainages and fee withholdings expected to be billed beyond the next 12 months |
6,767 | 8,677 | ||||
Total accounts receivable, net |
$ | 530,974 | $ | 485,702 | ||
6. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||
Customer contracts and related customer relationships |
$ | 253,042 | $ | 233,531 | ||||
Acquired technology and in-process research and development |
27,177 | | ||||||
Covenants not to compete |
2,373 | 2,409 | ||||||
Other |
1,631 | 851 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
284,223 | 236,791 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(166,100 | ) | (138,962 | ) | ||||
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 118,123 | $ | 97,829 | ||||
13
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from 12 to 120 months. The weighted-average period of amortization for all intangible assets as of March 31, 2010 is 8.1 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 5.9 years. See Note 3 for information on acquisitions completed since July 1, 2009. Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year ending June 30, |
Amount | ||
2010 (three months) |
$ | 9,776 | |
2011 |
34,913 | ||
2012 |
23,515 | ||
2013 |
15,979 | ||
2014 |
12,837 | ||
Thereafter |
21,103 | ||
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 118,123 | |
7. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||
Convertible notes payable |
$ | 300,000 | $ | 300,000 | ||||
Bank credit facility term loans |
279,395 | 331,625 | ||||||
U.K. notes payable |
| 5,336 | ||||||
Bank credit facility revolver |
| 628 | ||||||
Principal amount of long-term debt |
579,395 | 637,589 | ||||||
Less unamortized discount |
(50,236 | ) | (58,047 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
529,159 | 579,542 | ||||||
Less current portion |
(2,972 | ) | (9,464 | ) | ||||
Long term debt, net of current portion |
$ | 526,187 | $ | 570,078 | ||||
(1) | Balances related to convertible notes payable have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the updates to ASC 470-20. See Note 2. |
Bank Credit Facilities
The Company has a $590.0 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), consisting of a $240.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $350.0 million institutional term loan (the Term Loan). The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued.
The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $240.0 million, with an expiration date of May 3, 2011, and annual sub-limits on amounts borrowed for acquisitions. The Revolving Facility contains an accordion feature under which the facility may be expanded to $450.0 million with applicable lender approvals. The Revolving Facility permits one, two, three and six month interest rate options. The Company pays a fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility, based on its leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility. Any outstanding balances under the Revolving Facility are due in full May 3, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Facility and no outstanding letters of credit.
The Term Loan is a secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $0.7 million at the end of each fiscal quarter through March 2011, and the balance is due in full on May 3, 2011. In July 2009, the Company made a $50.0 million prepayment on the Term Loan. From time to time the Company may make additional prepayments based on cash flows, working capital requirements and other capital needs.
Borrowings under both the Revolving Facility and the Term Loan bear interest at rates based on the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR), or the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent, as elected by the Company, in each case plus applicable margins based on the Companys leverage ratio as determined quarterly. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the effective interest rate, excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for borrowings under the Credit Facility, was 1.67 percent and 3.11 percent, respectively.
14
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants that stipulate a minimum amount of net worth, a minimum fixed-charge coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio and a maximum senior leverage ratio. Substantially all of the Companys assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement dated as of May 3, 2004, as amended, governing the Credit Facility provides the remedies available to the lenders in the event of an uncured violation of any of the covenants. Such remedies may include the termination of the Credit Facility and the demand for payment of all outstanding amounts due thereunder. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, the Company has always been in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
The Company has capitalized a total of $10.2 million of debt issuance costs associated with the origination of and subsequent amendments to the Credit Facility. All capitalized debt financing costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility. The unamortized balance of $1.4 million and $2.6 million at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, is included in other long-term assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Cash Flow Hedges
In December 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the 2007 Swap) under which it exchanged floating-rate interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments on a notional amount of debt totaling $100.0 million. The agreements provided for swap payments over a twenty-four month period beginning in December 2007 and were settled on a quarterly basis. The weighted-average fixed interest rate provided by the agreements was 4.04 percent. The 2007 Swap expired in December 2009.
In June 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement under which the floating-rate interest payments on a notional amount of debt of $68.0 million are capped at 7 percent (the 2008 Cap). The 2008 Cap became effective June 11, 2008 for a period of two years and provides for quarterly settlements, when applicable.
The Company accounts for its interest rate swap and cap agreements under the provisions of ASC 815 and has determined that its swap and cap agreements qualify as effective hedges. The increase in fair value of the 2007 Swap of $1.7 million, net of an income tax effect of $0.7 million, is reported as other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The fair value of the 2008 Cap as of March 31, 2010 and the changes thereof during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 are insignificant.
The amounts paid and received on the 2007 Swap, and any amounts that may be paid or received on the 2008 Cap, are recorded in interest expense as yield adjustments in the period during which the related floating-rate interest is incurred.
The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes and does not consider its risk of loss in the event of nonperformance by any counterparty under derivative financial instrument agreements to be significant. Although derivative financial instruments expose the Company to market risk, fluctuations in the value of the derivatives are mitigated by expected offsetting fluctuations in the matched exposures.
All derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities, measured at estimated fair value. Fair value estimates are based on relevant market information, including market rates. For a derivative designated as a cash-flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is recognized in earnings as interest rate swap or cap payments are settled under the hedge agreements.
15
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
The effects of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
Derivatives in ASC 815 cash flow hedging relationships |
|||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) recognized in comprehensive income (effective portion) |
$ | | $ | 336 | $ | 1,045 | $ | (617 | ) | ||||||
Loss reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss (effective portion) |
$ | | $ | (539 | ) | $ | (1,817 | ) | $ | (1,101 | ) | ||||
Gain recognized in earnings (ineffective portion) |
| | | | |||||||||||
$ | | $ | (539 | ) | $ | (1,817 | ) | $ | (1,101 | ) | |||||
The fair values and the classification of derivatives within the consolidated balance sheets are disclosed in Note 14.
Convertible Notes Payable
Effective May 16, 2007, the Company issued the Notes in a private placement. The Notes were issued at par value and are subordinate to the Companys senior secured debt. Interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
Holders may convert their notes at a conversion rate of 18.2989 shares of CACI common stock for each $1,000 of note principal (an initial conversion price of $54.65 per share) under the following circumstances: 1) if the last reported sale price of CACI stock is greater than or equal to 130 percent of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; 2) during the five consecutive business day period immediately after any ten consecutive trading day period (the note measurement period) in which the average of the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of convertible note was equal to or less than 97 percent of the average product of the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock and the conversion rate of each date during the note measurement period; 3) upon the occurrence of certain corporate events constituting a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the Notes; or 4) during the last three-month period prior to maturity. CACI is required to satisfy 100 percent of the principal amount of these notes solely in cash, with any amounts above the principal amount to be satisfied in common stock. As of March 31, 2010, none of the conditions permitting conversion of the Notes had been satisfied.
In the event of a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, holders may require the Company to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to the principal amount plus any accrued interest. Also, if certain fundamental changes occur prior to maturity, the Company will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock or, in lieu thereof, the Company may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related conversion obligation so that these notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company. The Company is not permitted to redeem the Notes.
The Notes are accounted for under the updated provisions of ASC 470-20, which were adopted by the Company effective July 1, 2009. This accounting standard update was required to be applied retrospectively and accordingly balances affected by changes to ASC 470-20 as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2009, have been adjusted to reflect the impacts of the update. The effects on previously reported balances are described in Note 2.
The Company separately accounts for the liability and the equity (conversion option) components of the Notes and recognizes interest expense on the Notes using an interest rate in effect for comparable debt instruments that do not contain conversion features. The effective interest rate for the Notes excluding the conversion option was determined to be 6.9 percent.
The fair value of the liability component of the Notes was calculated to be $221.9 million at May 16, 2007, the date of issuance. The excess of the $300.0 million of gross proceeds over the $221.9 million fair value of the liability component, or $78.1 million, represents the fair value of the equity component, which has been recorded, net of income
16
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
tax effect, as additional paid-in capital within shareholders equity. This $78.1 million difference represents a debt discount that is amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes as a non-cash component of interest expense. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the components of interest expense related to the Notes were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Coupon interest |
$ | 1,594 | $ | 1,594 | $ | 4,781 | $ | 4,781 | ||||
Non-cash amortization of discount |
2,651 | 2,477 | 7,811 | 7,299 | ||||||||
Amortization of issuance costs |
205 | 205 | 615 | 615 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,450 | $ | 4,276 | $ | 13,207 | $ | 12,695 | ||||
The balance of the unamortized discount as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, was $50.2 million and $58.0 million, respectively. The discount will continue to be amortized as additional, non-cash interest expense over the remaining term of the Notes (through May 1, 2014) using the effective interest method as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year ending June 30, |
Amount Amortized During Period | ||
2010 (three months) |
$ | 2,688 | |
2011 |
11,235 | ||
2012 |
12,024 | ||
2013 |
12,868 | ||
2014 |
11,421 | ||
$ | 50,236 | ||
The fair value of the Notes as of March 31, 2010 was $315.0 million based on quoted market values.
The contingently issuable shares related to the Notes are not included in CACIs diluted share count for the three or nine months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009, because CACIs average stock price during those periods was below the conversion price. Of total debt issuance costs of $7.8 million, $5.8 million is being amortized to interest expense over seven years. In connection with the adoption of the updates to ASC 470-20, the Company reclassified the remaining $2.0 million of debt issuance costs attributable to the embedded conversion option from other long-term assets to additional paid-in capital. This adjustment was applied retroactively to the date of issue and has the effect of decreasing interest expense over the term of the Notes by $0.3 million annually. Upon closing of the sale of the Notes, $45.5 million of the net proceeds was used to concurrently repurchase one million shares of CACIs common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The cost of the Call Options was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. The Call Options allow CACI to receive shares of its common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that CACI would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion.
For income tax reporting purposes, the Notes and the Call Options are integrated. This created an original issue discount for income tax reporting purposes, and therefore the cost of the Call Options is being accounted for as interest expense over the term of the Notes for income tax reporting purposes. The associated income tax benefit of $32.8 million to be realized for income tax reporting purposes over the term of the Notes was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and a long-term deferred tax asset. The majority of this deferred tax asset is offset in the Companys balance sheet by the $30.7 million deferred tax liability that was recognized with the adoption of the update to ASC 470-20 that was retroactively applied to May 16, 2007.
In addition, the Company sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million and were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
17
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACIs common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options are anti-dilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted shares outstanding. The Warrants will result in additional diluted shares outstanding if CACIs average common stock price exceeds $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind CACI and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.
U.K. Notes Payable
On April 2, 2008, in connection with its May 2006 acquisition of Sophron Partners Limited, CACI Limited issued loan notes totaling 3.2 million pounds sterling for earn-out consideration that is no longer contingent. These notes were paid in full during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Other
In connection with its investment in eVentures, a joint venture between the Company and ActioNet, Inc., eVentures entered into a $1.5 million revolving credit facility (the JV Facility). The JV Facility is a four-year, guaranteed facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $1.5 million with an expiration date of the earliest of September 14, 2011; the date of any restatement, refinancing, or replacement of the Credit Facility without the lender acting as the sole and exclusive administrative agent; or termination of the Credit Facility. Borrowings under the JV Facility bear interest at the lenders prime rate plus 1.0 percent. eVentures pays a fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the JV Facility. As of March 31, 2010, eVentures had no borrowings outstanding under the JV Facility.
The aggregate maturities of the Companys long-term debt at March 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Twelve months ending March 31, |
||||
2011 |
$ | 2,972 | ||
2012 |
276,423 | |||
2013 |
| |||
2014 |
| |||
2015 |
300,000 | |||
579,395 | ||||
Less unamortized discount |
(50,236 | ) | ||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 529,159 | ||
8. Commitments and Contingencies
General Legal Matters
The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations and liquidity.
Iraq Matters
On April 26, 2004, the Company received information indicating that one of its employees was identified in a report authored by U.S. Army Major General Antonio M. Taguba as being connected to allegations of abuse of Iraqi detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison facility. To date, despite the Taguba Report and the subsequently-issued Fay Report addressing alleged inappropriate conduct at Abu Ghraib, no present or former employee of the Company has been officially charged with any offense in connection with the Abu Ghraib allegations.
The Company does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial statements.
18
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
Government Contracting
Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee contracts are provisional and are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The DCAA is currently in the process of auditing the Companys incurred cost submission for the year ended June 30, 2006. In the opinion of management, audit adjustments that may result from audits not yet completed or started are not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including those of the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.
In April 2007, the DCAA conducted a contract review and questioned certain costs on a contract in which the Company is a subcontractor. In February 2010, the Company received a subpoena from the Department of Justice requesting documents related to its work on the contract. In April 2010, the Company provided responsive documents to the subpoena. The Company believes that all costs allocated to this contract were appropriately allocated, but has accrued its best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of zero to $3.4 million.
9. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense recognized, together with the income tax benefits recognized, is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation included in indirect costs and selling expenses: |
||||||||||||
Non-qualified stock option and stock settled stock appreciation right (SSAR) expense |
$ | 1,907 | $ | 2,380 | $ | 6,526 | $ | 7,649 | ||||
Restricted stock and restricted stock unit (RSU) expense |
3,298 | 1,627 | 11,424 | 5,435 | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 5,205 | $ | 4,007 | $ | 17,950 | $ | 13,084 | ||||
Income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 1,773 | $ | 1,636 | $ | 6,449 | $ | 5,478 | ||||
Under the terms of its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, nonqualified stock options, SSARs, restricted stock, RSUs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. The 2006 Plan was approved by the Companys stockholders in November 2006 and replaced the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1996 Plan), which was due to expire at the end of a ten-year period. During all periods presented, the exercise price of all SSAR and non-qualified stock option grants and the value of all restricted stock and RSU grants were set at the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock on the date of grant, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. Annual grants under the 2006 Plan (and previous grants under the 1996 Plan) are generally made to the Companys key employees during the first quarter of the Companys fiscal year and to members of the Companys Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Companys fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance.
Prior to June 2007, the Company issued equity instruments to its key employees in the form of non-qualified stock options and either RSUs or shares of restricted stock. Effective in June 2007, the Company began issuing SSARs instead of non-qualified stock options. RSUs and shares of restricted stock granted through June 2008 vest based on the passage of time and continued service as an employee of the Company. For its annual grants made in August 2008 and August 2009, the Company issued RSUs for which vesting is based on achievement of a performance metric in addition to grantee service (performance-based RSUs). For performance-based RSUs, vesting is initially dependent upon the net after-tax profit (NATP) reported by the Company for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The maximum number of RSUs which will vest is based on the achievement of a certain NATP which is established annually by the Companys Board of Directors. No RSUs will vest if NATP is less than a pre-defined minimum amount. In addition, vesting is contingent upon grantee service. Once the NATP for the year ending June 30, 2010 is determined, grantees
19
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
will then vest in the underlying shares in increments of one-third on an annual basis beginning two years after the grant date for the performance-based RSUs granted in August 2008, and increments of one-fourth on an annual basis beginning one year after the grant date for performance-based RSUs granted in August 2009. All performance-based RSUs awarded for a given NATP level and for which service requirements are fulfilled will have fully vested four years after the grant date.
Prior to November 2008, the Company issued equity instruments to members of its Board of Directors in the form of a set number of non-qualified stock options. Effective in November 2008, the Companys shareholders approved a change to grant equity to members of the Board of Directors in the form of a set dollar value of RSUs. The grants vest based on the passage of time and continued service as a Director of the Company.
Upon the exercise of stock options and SSARs, and the vestings of restricted shares and RSUs, the Company fulfills its obligations under the equity instrument agreements by either issuing new shares of authorized common stock or by issuing shares from treasury. In November 2009, the Companys shareholders voted to increase the number of shares that may be issued under the 2006 Plan in the form of RSUs or unrestricted stock from 1,500,000 shares to 2,500,000 shares. The number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2006 Plan and the 1996 Plan was 10,950,000 as of March 31, 2010. The aggregate number of grants that may be made under the 2006 Plan may exceed this approved amount as forfeited SSARs, stock options, restricted stock and RSUs, and vested but unexercised SSARs and stock options that expire, become available for future grants. As of March 31, 2010, cumulative grants of 10,688,379 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized for the Plan have been awarded, and 2,087,639 of these instruments have been forfeited.
Activity related to SSARs/non-qualified stock options and RSUs/restricted shares issued under the 1996 and 2006 Plans during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
SSARs/ Non-qualified Stock Options |
RSUs/ Restricted Shares |
||||||
Outstanding, June 30, 2009 |
3,379,045 | 578,814 | |||||
Granted |
| 499,466 | |||||
Exercised/Issued |
(183,672 | ) | (91,661 | ) | |||
Forfeited/Lapsed |
(63,377 | ) | (15,380 | ) | |||
Outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
3,131,996 | 971,239 | |||||
Weighted average grant date fair value for RSUs/restricted shares |
$ | 46.01 | |||||
Non-qualified stock options granted prior to January 1, 2004 lapse and are no longer exercisable if not exercised within ten years of the date of grant. Equity instruments granted on or after January 1, 2004 have a term of seven years. For SSAR and stock option awards, grantees whose employment has terminated have 60 days after their termination date to exercise vested SSARs and stock options, or they forfeit their right to the instruments. Grantees whose employment is terminated due to death or permanent disability will vest in 100 percent of their equity instrument grants. Also, effective for grants made on or after July 1, 2004, grantees who were age 62 on or before July 1, 2008 who retire on or after age 65 will vest in 100 percent of their equity instrument grants upon retirement, with the exception of performance-based RSUs, which must be held at least until the measurement period is complete. Grantees who were not age 62 on or before July 1, 2008, who retire on or after age 62, vest in a prorated portion of their equity instrument grants upon retirement, based upon their service during the vesting period, with the exception of performance-based RSUs, which must be held until the measurement period is complete. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of incremental, accelerated stock compensation expense for awards made to employees who were either nearing or had reached the applicable retirement age at the date of grant.
As of March 31, 2010, there was $11.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SSARs and stock options scheduled to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years, and $26.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares and RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years.
20
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
10. Stock Purchase Plans
The Company adopted the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), the Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP), and the Director Stock Purchase Plan (DSPP) in November 2002, and implemented these plans beginning July 1, 2003. In November 2009, the ESPP was amended to increase the number of shares authorized for grant by 250,000. These plans provide employees, management, and directors with an opportunity to acquire or increase ownership interest in the Company through the purchase of shares of the Companys common stock, subject to certain terms and conditions. There are 1,000,000, 500,000, and 75,000 shares authorized for grants under the ESPP, MSPP and DSPP, respectively.
The ESPP allows eligible full-time employees to purchase shares of common stock at 95 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of each quarter. The maximum number of shares that an eligible employee can purchase during any quarter is equal to two times an amount determined as follows: 20 percent of such employees compensation over the quarter, divided by 95 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of the quarter. The ESPP is a qualified plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and, for financial reporting purposes, was amended effective July 1, 2005 so as to be considered non-compensatory. Accordingly, there is no stock-based compensation expense associated with shares acquired under the ESPP. As of March 31, 2010, participants have purchased 698,769 shares under the ESPP at a weighted-average price per share of $44.93. Of these shares, 18,132 were purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2010, at a weighted-average price per share of $46.41. To satisfy its obligations under the ESPP, the Company will either purchase shares in the open market or issue shares previously acquired and held in treasury. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company purchased 18,132 shares in the open market to fulfill the employees share purchases.
The MSPP provides those senior executives with stock holding requirements a mechanism to receive RSUs in lieu of up to 100 percent of their annual bonus. For bonuses earned during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, RSUs awarded in lieu of bonuses earned were granted at 85 percent of the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock on the date of grant, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. RSUs granted under the MSPP vest at the earlier of 1) three years from the grant date, 2) upon a change of control of the Company, 3) upon a participants retirement at or after age 65, or 4) upon a participants death or permanent disability. Vested RSUs are settled in shares of common stock. The Company recognizes the value of the discount applied to RSUs granted under the MSPP as stock compensation expense ratably over the three-year vesting period.
The DSPP allows directors to elect to receive RSUs at the market price of the Companys common stock on the date of the award in lieu of up to 100 percent of their annual retainer fees. Vested RSUs are settled in shares of common stock.
Activity related to the MSPP and DSPP during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
MSPP | DSPP | ||||||
RSUs outstanding, June 30, 2009 |
60,733 | 162 | |||||
Granted |
28,361 | 191 | |||||
Issued |
(13,754 | ) | | ||||
Forfeited |
(2,496 | ) | | ||||
RSUs outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
72,844 | 353 | |||||
Weighted average grant date fair value as adjusted for the applicable discount |
$ | 39.46 | |||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 49.08 | |||||
21
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
11. Earnings Per Share
ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260), requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those RSUs that are not performance-based. The performance-based RSUs granted in August 2008 and August 2009 are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the underlying shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares. These shares will be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share beginning in the first reporting period in which the performance metric is achieved. The chart below shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
|||||||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | 26,708 | $ | 21,972 | $ | 76,615 | $ | 62,214 | ||||
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding during the period |
30,171 | 29,939 | 30,104 | 29,979 | ||||||||
Dilutive effect of SSARs/stock options and RSUs/restricted shares after application of treasury stock method |
470 | 471 | 457 | 467 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding during the period |
30,641 | 30,410 | 30,561 | 30,446 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.89 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 2.55 | $ | 2.08 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 2.51 | $ | 2.04 | ||||
(1) | Reflects the retroactive adoption of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
Shares outstanding during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, reflect the August 2008 repurchase of 0.4 million shares of CACIs common stock pursuant to a share repurchase program approved by the Companys Board of Directors in June 2008.
12. Income Taxes
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment. The Internal Revenue Service recently completed its field audit of the Companys consolidated federal income tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2005 through 2007 and earlier years in connection with amended returns and carryback claims filed by the Company. The Company expects to receive the refunds reflected on its amended returns and carryback claims, as adjusted for the results of the field audit, before the end of the Companys fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The resolution of the issues under examination in connection with the adjustments reflected on its amended returns and carryback claims caused a reduction in the Companys liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $6.7 million and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital and did not affect the Companys results of operations. The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the year ended June 30, 2008 and by four state jurisdictions and one foreign jurisdiction for years ended June 30, 2004 through June 30, 2006. The Company does not expect the resolution of these examinations to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
The Companys total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was $5.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively. The Company believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would not have a material effect on its effective tax rate.
22
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
During the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2010, the Companys income tax expense was favorably impacted by non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies, interest earned for refunds due on prior year tax returns and tax benefits related to deductions claimed for income from qualified domestic production activities.
13. Business Segment Information
The Company reports operating results and financial data in two segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide professional services and information technology solutions to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. The Company does not measure revenue or profit by its major service offerings, either for internal management or external financial reporting purposes, as it would be impractical to do so. In many cases more than one offering is provided under a single contract, to a single customer, or by a single employee or group of employees, and segregating the costs of the service offerings in situations for which it is not required would be difficult and costly. The Company also serves customers in the commercial and state and local government sectors and, from time to time, serves a number of agencies of foreign governments. The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its clients. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily through the Companys data information and knowledge management services, business systems solutions, and enterprise IT and network services lines of business. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income. Summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):
Domestic | International | Total | |||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 754,206 | $ | 29,963 | $ | 784,169 | |||
Net income attributable to CACI |
24,643 | 2,065 | 26,708 | ||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 655,077 | $ | 18,917 | $ | 673,994 | |||
Net income attributable to CACI (as adjusted(1)) |
20,464 | 1,508 | 21,972 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 2,211,829 | $ | 88,585 | $ | 2,300,414 | |||
Net income attributable to CACI |
70,469 | 6,146 | 76,615 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 1,941,752 | $ | 59,509 | $ | 2,001,261 | |||
Net income attributable to CACI (as adjusted(1)) |
58,499 | 3,715 | 62,214 |
(1) | Reflects the retroactive adoption of new accounting standards. See Note 2. |
14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels under ASC 820, as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
23
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(Continued)
| Level 2 Inputs unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. |
| Level 3 Inputs amounts derived from valuation models in which unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions of market participants that would be used in pricing the asset or liability. |
As of March 31, 2010, the Companys financial instruments measured at fair value included non-COLI money market investments and mutual funds held in the Companys supplemental retirement plan, the obligations to participants under the same plan, contingent consideration in connection with business combinations completed since June 30, 2009 and the Companys interest rate cap agreement. The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
Description of Financial Instrument |
Financial Statement Classification |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
Fair Value | ||||
Non-COLI assets held in Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Long-term asset |
Level 1 | $ | 6,462 | |||
Obligations under Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Current liability |
Level 2 | $ | 2,777 | |||
Obligations under Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Long-term liability |
Level 2 | $ | 51,875 | |||
Interest rate cap |
|
Level 2 | | ||||
Contingent consideration |
Long-term liability |
Level 3 | $ | 36,627 |
Changes in the fair value of the assets held in the supplemental retirement plan, as well as changes in the related deferred compensation obligation, are recorded in indirect costs and selling expense. The Company is in the process of finalizing its detailed valuations of the contingent consideration for the three acquisitions completed since June 30, 2009. The final results of the valuations may differ from managements estimates currently recorded and the balances will be adjusted to reflect the final results. After the valuations of the contingent consideration as of the acquisition dates are finalized, they will be re-measured each reporting period and any changes will be recognized in the Companys statement of operations for such period.
15. Joint Venture Investments
AC FIRST LLC
In July 2009, the Company entered into a joint venture with AECOM Government Services, Inc. (AGS), a division of AECOM Technology Corporation, called AC FIRST LLC (AC FIRST). The companies partnered in the venture to jointly pursue work under a U.S. Army contract. The Company owns 49 percent of AC FIRST and AGS owns 51 percent. As the Company does not own a controlling interest in AC FIRST, the Company accounts for its interest in AC FIRST using the equity method of accounting.
eVenture Technologies LLC
The Company has also made an investment in eVentures, a joint venture between the Company and ActioNet, Inc. (ActioNet). eVentures is the entity through which work is being performed on a contract awarded in January 2007 by the United States Navy. The Company owns 60 percent of eVentures and ActioNet owns the remaining 40 percent. eVentures was funded through capital contributions made by the Company and by ActioNet. As the Company owns and controls more than 50 percent of eVentures, the Companys results include those of eVentures. ActioNets share of eVentures assets, liabilities, results of operations, and cash flows have been accounted for as a noncontrolling interest.
Prior to July 1, 2009, the Company had accounted for ActioNets interest in eVentures as a minority interest. Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the updates to ASC 810, and has retroactively adjusted its financial statements to account for ActioNets share of eVentures as a noncontrolling interest. See Note 2.
24
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward Looking Statements
There are statements made herein which do not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, but are not limited to, the following: regional and national economic conditions in the United States and the United Kingdom, including conditions that result from prolonged economic weakness; terrorist activities or war; changes in interest rates; currency fluctuations; significant fluctuations in the equity markets; changes in our effective tax rate; finalization of accounting for business combinations, including valuation of intangibles and contingent consideration; failure to achieve contract awards in connection with re-competes for present business and/or competition for new business; the risks and uncertainties associated with client interest in and purchases of new products and/or services; continued funding of U.S. government or other public sector projects, based on a change in spending patterns, or in the event of a priority need for funds, such as homeland security, the war on terrorism, rebuilding Iraq, or an economic stimulus package; government contract procurement (such as bid protest, small business set asides, loss of work due to organizational conflicts of interest, etc.) and termination risks; the results of government investigations into allegations of improper actions related to the provision of services in support of U.S. military operations in Iraq; the results of government audits and reviews conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency or other governmental entities with cognizant oversight; the insourcing of contractor positions by the government; individual business decisions of our clients; paradigm shifts in technology; competitive factors such as pricing pressures and/or competition to hire and retain employees (particularly those with security clearances); market speculation regarding our continued independence; material changes in laws or regulations applicable to our businesses, particularly in connection with (i) government contracts for services, (ii) outsourcing of activities that have been performed by the government, and (iii) competition for task orders under Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) and/or schedule contracts with the General Services Administration; the ability to successfully integrate the operations of our recent acquisitions; our own ability to achieve the objectives of near term or long range business plans; and other risks described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We are a leading provider of professional services and information technology solutions to the U.S. government. We derived 94.8 percent and 95.9 percent of our revenue during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, from contracts with U.S. government agencies. These were derived through both prime and subcontractor relationships. We also provide services to state and local governments and commercial customers. Our major service offerings are as follows:
| Enterprise IT and network services We support our clients critical networked operational missions by providing tailored end-to-end enterprise information technology services for the design, establishment, management, security and operations of client infrastructure. Our operational, analytic, consultancy and transformational services effectively use industry best practices and standards to enable and optimize the full life cycle of the networked environment, improve customer service, improve efficiency, and reduce total cost and complexity of large, geographically dispersed operations. |
| Data, information and knowledge management services We deliver a full spectrum of solutions and services that automate the knowledge management life cycle from data capture through information analysis and understanding. We provide commercially-based products, custom solutions development, and operations and maintenance services that facilitate information sharing. Our information technology solutions are complemented by a suite of analytical expertise support offerings for our U.S. government intelligence community, Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Justice (DoJ), and Homeland Security customers. |
| Business system solutions We provide solutions that address the full spectrum of requirements in the financial, procurement, human resources, supply chain and other business domains. Our solutions employ an integrated cross-functional approach to maximize investments in existing systems, while leveraging the potential of advanced technologies to implement new, high payback solutions. Our offerings include services, consulting and software development/integration that support the full life cycle of commercial technology implementation from blueprint through application sustainment. |
25
| Logistics and material readiness services We offer a full suite of solutions and service offerings that plan for, implement and control the efficient and effective flow and storage of goods, services and information in support of U.S. government agencies. We develop and manage logistics information systems, specialized simulation and modeling toolsets, and provide logistics engineering services. Our operational capabilities span the supply chain, including advance logistics planning, demand forecasting, total asset visibility (including the use of Radio Frequency Identification technology) and life cycle support for weapons systems. Our logistics services are a critical enabler in support of defense readiness and combat sustainability objectives. |
| C4ISR integration services We provide rapid response services in support of military missions in a coordinated and controlled operational setting. We support the military efforts to ensure delivery and sustainment of integrated, enterprise wide, Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) programs. We integrate sensors, mission applications and systems that connect with DoD data networks. |
| Cyber security Our solutions and services support the full life cycle of preparing for, protecting against, detecting, reacting to and actively responding to the full range of cyber threats. We achieve this through comprehensive and consistently managed risk-based, cost-effective controls and measures to protect information operated by the U.S. government. We proactively support the operational use and availability/reliability of information. |
| Integrated security and intelligence solutions The United States, its partners and its allies around the world face state, non-state and transnational adversaries that do not recognize political boundaries; do not recognize international law; and will seek, through asymmetric and irregular means, ways to strike at seams in our national security. We assist clients in developing integrated solutions that close gaps between security, intelligence, and law enforcement in order to address complex threats to our national security. |
| Program management and system engineering and technical assistance (SETA) services We support U.S. government Program Executive Offices and Program Management Offices via subject matter experts and comprehensive technical management processes that optimize program resources. This includes translating operational requirements into configured systems, integrating technical inputs, characterizing and managing risk, transitioning technology into program efforts, and verifying that designs meet operational needs, through the application of internationally recognized and accepted standards. Additionally, we provide SETA and advisory and assistance services that include contract and acquisition management, operations support, architecture and system engineering services, project and portfolio management, strategy and policy support, and complex trade analyses. |
In the near term, we face some uncertainties due to the current business environment. We continue to experience a number of protests of major contract awards. In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to have security clearances and employ personnel with specific levels of education, work experience and security clearances. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense. In addition, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty, or to decide not to exercise options to renew contracts. Among the factors that could affect our federal government contracting business are the continued demand and priority of funding for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, an increase in set-asides for small businesses, government insourcing, and budgetary priorities limiting or delaying federal government spending in general.
Our operations are also affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. The consequences of a prolonged global economic downturn or a continued weak U.S. economy and large federal budget deficits may include a lower level of government spending in the areas in which we provide our services. Instability in the financial markets, as a result of economic weakness or other factors, also may affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital. In addition, future material losses on assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance policies would adversely affect our income tax expense.
26
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||
Department of Defense (DoD) |
$ | 611,884 | 78.0 | % | $ | 514,713 | 76.4 | % | $ | 97,171 | 18.9 | % | |||||||
Federal civilian agencies |
130,661 | 16.7 | 133,568 | 19.8 | (2,907 | ) | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Commercial and other |
37,867 | 4.8 | 20,860 | 3.1 | 17,007 | 81.5 | |||||||||||||
State and local governments |
3,757 | 0.5 | 4,853 | 0.7 | (1,096 | ) | (22.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 784,169 | 100.0 | % | $ | 673,994 | 100.0 | % | $ | 110,175 | 16.3 | % | |||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, total revenue increased by 16.3 percent, or $110.2 million, over the same period a year ago. This growth in revenue resulted primarily from the higher volume of work from DoD and was generated both from organic growth and from acquisitions completed since December 31, 2008. Revenue generated from the date a business is acquired through the first anniversary of that date is considered acquired revenue. Our acquired revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $14.6 million, of which $7.5 million related to acquisitions completed in the U.K. and $7.1 million related to the acquisitions completed in the U.S.
Revenue from existing operations increased by 14.2 percent, or $95.6 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This organic growth was driven by both an increase in our direct labor and an increase in other direct costs (ODCs). ODCs include work which we subcontract to third parties to meet customer needs.
DoD revenue increased 18.9 percent, or $97.2 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. Substantially all of the DoD revenue growth was attributable to existing operations. DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications of the commands in Iraq and Afghanistan. DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.
Revenue from federal civilian agencies decreased 2.2 percent, or $2.9 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. This decrease is primarily attributable to revenue earned in the three months ended March 31, 2009 on projects that were substantially completed prior to June 30, 2009 and the timing of the fees on certain contracts where we recognize a portion of the fees upon customer approval. Approximately 15.1 percent of the federal civilian agency revenue for the quarter was derived from DoJ, for whom we provide litigation support services. Revenue from DoJ was $19.7 million and $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Commercial revenue increased 81.5 percent, or $17.0 million, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. Of this increase $13.7 million came from our recent acquisitions. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. International operations accounted for 79.1 percent, or $30.0 million, of total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 20.9 percent, or $7.9 million. The increase in organic commercial revenue came from operations within the U.K. and was primarily caused by the improved performance of our U.K. operations during the quarter.
Revenue from state and local governments decreased by 22.6 percent, or $1.1 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Our continued focus on DoD and federal civilian agency opportunities has resulted in a relatively reduced emphasis on state and local government business.
27
Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bore to revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Dollar Amount | Percentage of Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 784,169 | $ | 673,994 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 110,175 | 16.3 | % | |||||||||
Costs of revenue |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
551,191 | 461,757 | 70.3 | 68.5 | 89,434 | 19.4 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect costs and selling expenses |
171,451 | 155,445 | 21.9 | 23.0 | 16,006 | 10.3 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,205 | 11,818 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2,387 | 20.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs of revenue |
736,847 | 629,020 | 94.0 | 93.3 | 107,827 | 17.1 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
47,322 | 44,974 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 2,348 | 5.2 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
6,488 | 7,538 | 0.8 | 1.1 | (1,050 | ) | (13.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
40,834 | 37,436 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 3,398 | 9.1 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
14,055 | 15,356 | 1.8 | 2.3 | (1,301 | ) | (8.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
26,779 | 22,080 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 4,699 | 21.3 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
(71 | ) | (108 | ) | | | 37 | (34.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | 26,708 | $ | 21,972 | 3.4 | % | 3.3 | % | $ | 4,736 | 21.6 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Certain amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $47.3 million. This was an increase of $2.3 million, or 5.2 percent, from income from operations of $45.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Our operating margin was 6.0 percent down from the 6.7 percent during the same period a year ago. The decrease in operating margin is primary attributable to a growth in ODCs which exceeded our growth in direct labor.
As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 70.3 percent and 68.5 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and ODCs, which include, among other costs, subcontractor labor and materials along with equipment purchases and travel expenses. ODCs, which are common in our industry, typically are incurred in response to specific client tasks and may vary from period to period. The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor, was $206.1 million and $193.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This increase in direct labor was primarily attributable to organic growth. ODCs were $345.1 million and $268.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This increase was primarily driven by an increased volume of tasking across C4ISR integration services within our Strategic Services Sourcing (S3) contract.
Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits, marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 21.9 percent and 23.0 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in indirect costs and selling expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily a result of controlling our various indirect and general and administrative expenses and the aforementioned higher ODC content which require less indirect costs and selling expenses. These decreases were partially offset by higher stock compensation expense, which increased from $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was primarily the result of adjusting performance-based RSU expense to reflect higher estimated net after-tax income during the performance measurement period.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $14.2 million and $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase of $2.4 million, or 20.2 percent, was primarily the result of increased amortization expense attributable to acquired intangibles.
28
Interest expense and other, net decreased $1.1 million, or 13.9 percent, during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates and the July 2009 $50.0 million prepayment on our term loan.
The effective tax rate was 34.5 percent and 41.1 percent during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The lower tax rate reported in the third quarter of FY2010 was primarily attributable to tax benefits related to deductions claimed for income from qualified domestic production activities and to non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance policies to date compared to non-deductible losses incurred in the same period of last year. If gains or losses on these investments throughout the rest of the current fiscal year vary from our estimates, our effective tax rate will fluctuate in the last quarter of the year ending June 30, 2010.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
Nine Months Ended March 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||
Department of Defense |
$ | 1,786,846 | 77.7 | % | $ | 1,514,421 | 75.7 | % | $ | 272,425 | 18.0 | % | |||||||
Federal civilian agencies |
393,408 | 17.1 | 405,119 | 20.2 | (11,711 | ) | (2.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Commercial and other |
107,087 | 4.6 | 66,375 | 3.3 | 40,712 | 61.3 | |||||||||||||
State and local governments |
13,073 | 0.6 | 15,346 | 0.8 | (2,273 | ) | (14.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,300,414 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,001,261 | 100.0 | % | $ | 299,153 | 14.9 | % | |||||||
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, total revenue increased by 14.9 percent, or $299.2 million, over the same period a year ago. This growth in revenue resulted primarily from the higher volume of work from DoD customers and was generated from both organic growth and acquisitions completed since June 30, 2008. Revenue generated from the date a business is acquired through the first anniversary of that date is considered acquired revenue. Our acquired revenue in the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $38.5 million, of which $25.1 million related to acquisitions completed in the U.K. and $13.4 million related to acquisitions completed in the U.S.
Revenue from existing operations increased by 13.0 percent or $260.6 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. This organic growth was driven by both an increase in our direct labor and a significant increase in ODCs. ODCs include work which we subcontract to third parties to meet customer needs.
DoD revenue increased 18.0 percent, or $272.4 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. Substantially all of the DoD revenue growth was attributable to existing operations. DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications of the commands in Iraq and Afghanistan. DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.
Revenue from federal civilian agencies decreased 2.9 percent, or $11.7 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. This decrease is primarily attributable to revenue earned on projects that were substantially completed prior to June 30, 2009 and the timing of the fees on certain contracts where we recognize a portion of the fees upon customer approval. Approximately 14.5 percent of the federal civilian agency revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was derived from DoJ, for whom we provide litigation support services. Revenue from DoJ was $57.0 million and $54.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.
Commercial revenue increased 61.3 percent, or $40.7 million, during the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. This increase primarily is attributable to our recent acquisitions. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. International operations accounted for 82.7 percent, or $88.6 million, of total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 17.3 percent, or $18.5 million.
Revenue from state and local governments decreased by 14.8 percent, or $2.3 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period a year ago. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue for both the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Our continued focus on DoD and federal civilian agency opportunities has resulted in a relatively reduced emphasis on state and local government business.
29
Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bore to revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Dollar Amount | Percentage of Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 (As Adjusted(1)) |
2010 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 2,300,414 | $ | 2,001,261 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 299,153 | 14.9 | % | |||||||||
Costs of revenue |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
1,604,848 | 1,366,790 | 69.8 | 68.3 | 238,058 | 17.4 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect costs and selling expenses |
515,849 | 467,297 | 22.4 | 23.3 | 48,552 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
38,906 | 35,633 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3,273 | 9.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs of revenue |
2,159,603 | 1,869,720 | 93.9 | 93.4 | 289,883 | 15.5 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
140,811 | 131,541 | 6.1 | 6.6 | 9,270 | 7.0 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
20,874 | 23,699 | 0.9 | 1.2 | (2,825 | ) | (11.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
119,937 | 107,842 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 12,095 | 11.2 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
42,973 | 45,141 | 1.9 | 2.3 | (2,168 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income before noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
76,964 | 62,701 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 14,263 | 22.7 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of joint venture |
(349 | ) | (487 | ) | | | 138 | (28.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to CACI |
$ | 76,615 | $ | 62,214 | 3.3 | % | 3.1 | % | $ | 14,401 | 23.1 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Certain amounts for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of new accounting standards. See Note 2 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
Income from operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $140.8 million. This is an increase of $9.3 million, or 7.0 percent, from income from operations of $131.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Our operating margin was 6.1 percent down from 6.6 percent during the same period a year ago. The decrease in operating margin is primary attributable to a growth in ODCs which exceeded our growth in direct labor.
As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 69.8 percent and 68.3 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and ODCs, which include, among other costs, subcontractor labor and materials along with equipment purchases and travel expenses. ODCs, which are common in our industry, typically are incurred in response to specific client tasks and may vary from period to period. The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor, was $598.9 million and $556.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This increase in direct labor was attributable to both organic growth and acquisitions completed since June 30, 2008. ODCs were $1.0 billion and $810.1 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This increase was primarily driven by an increased volume of tasking across C4ISR integration services within our S3 contract along with the aforementioned acquisitions.
Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits, marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 22.4 percent and 23.3 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease experienced during this period is primarily the result of integrating acquired businesses, controlling our various indirect and general and administrative expenses and the aforementioned higher ODC content which require less indirect cost and selling expenses. A component of indirect costs and selling expenses is stock compensation expense. Total stock compensation expense was $18.0 million and $13.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and increased primarily as a result of adjusting performance-based RSU expense to reflect higher estimated net after-tax income earned during the performance measurement period.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $38.9 million and $35.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This increase of $3.3 million, or 9.2 percent, is primarily the result of amortization expense attributable to intangibles acquired in the aforementioned acquisitions offset by a decrease in software amortization on externally marketed software.
30
Interest expense and other, net decreased $2.8 million, or 11.9 percent, during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates and the July 2009 $50.0 million prepayment on our Term Loan.
The effective tax rate was 35.9 percent and 42.0 percent during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 when compared with the same period in the prior year was primarily attributable to tax benefits related to deductions claimed for income from qualified domestic production activities and to non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance policies year-to-date compared to non-deductible losses incurred in the same period of last year. If gains or losses on those investments throughout the rest of the current fiscal year vary from our estimates, our effective tax rate will fluctuate in the last quarter of the year ending June 30, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our positive cash flow from operations and our available credit facilities have provided adequate liquidity and working capital to fund our operational needs. Cash flows from operations totaled $122.9 million and $94.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We maintain a $590.0 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), which includes a $240.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $350.0 million institutional term loan (the Term Loan). At March 31, 2010, $279.4 million was outstanding under the Term Loan, no amounts were outstanding under the Revolving Facility, and we had no outstanding letters of credits. The outstanding balance under the Term Loan reflects the $50.0 million prepayment made on July 8, 2009. We may make further prepayments based on cash flows, working capital requirements and other capital needs.
The Term Loan portion of the Credit Facility is a seven-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $0.7 million at the end of each fiscal quarter through March 2011, and the balance is due in full on May 3, 2011.
Interest rates for both Revolving Facility and Term Loan borrowings are based on the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR), or the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate in each case, plus applicable margins. Margin and unused facility fee rates are determined quarterly based on our leverage ratios. We are required to comply with certain financial covenants under the Credit Facility that limit our leverage, require us to maintain a minimum net worth and require us to meet a minimum fixed-charge coverage ratio. These financial covenants apply throughout the terms of the Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement dated as of May 3, 2004, as amended, governing our Credit Facility provides the remedies available to the lenders in the event of an uncured violation of any of the financial covenants. Such remedies may include the termination of the Credit Facility and the demand for payment of all outstanding amounts due thereunder. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have always been in compliance with all of the financial covenants and expect to remain in compliance through the May 2011 expiration of the Credit Facility. The total costs associated with securing the Credit Facility, as amended, were $10.2 million and are being amortized over the life of the Credit Facility.
Effective May 16, 2007, we issued the Notes which mature on May 1, 2014, in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Notes are subordinate to our senior secured debt, and interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
Holders may convert their notes at a conversion rate of 18.2989 shares of CACI common stock for each $1,000 of note principal (an initial conversion price of $54.65 per share) under the following circumstances: 1) if the last reported sale price of CACI stock is greater than or equal to 130 percent of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; 2) during the five consecutive business day period immediately after any ten consecutive trading day period (the note measurement period) in which the average of the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of convertible note was equal to or less than 97 percent of the average product of the closing price of a share of our common stock and the conversion rate of each date during the note measurement period; 3) upon the occurrence of certain corporate events constituting a fundamental change, as defined; or 4) during the last three-month period prior to maturity. We are required to satisfy 100 percent of the principal amount of these notes solely in cash, with any amounts above the principal amount to be satisfied in common stock. As of March 31, 2010, none of the conditions permitting conversion of the Notes had been satisfied.
In the event of a fundamental change, as defined, holders may require us to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to the principal amount plus any accrued interest. Also, if certain fundamental changes occur prior to maturity, we will in certain
31
circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock or, in lieu thereof, we may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related conversion obligation so that these notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company. We are not permitted to redeem the Notes.
The contingently issuable shares are not included in our diluted share count for the three or nine months periods ended March 31, 2010 or 2009, because our average stock price during those periods was below the conversion price. Of total debt issuance costs of $7.8 million, $5.8 million is being amortized to interest expense over seven years. The remaining $2.0 million of debt issuance costs are presented in shareholders equity. Upon closing of the sale of the Notes, $45.5 million of the net proceeds was used to concurrently repurchase one million shares of our common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The Call Options allow us to receive shares of our common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that we would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion. In addition, we sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million.
For income tax reporting purposes, the Notes and the Call Options are integrated. This created an original issue discount for income tax reporting purposes, and therefore the cost of the Call Options is being accounted for as interest expense over the term of the Notes for income tax reporting purposes. The associated income tax benefit of $32.8 million to be realized for income tax reporting purposes over the term of the Notes was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and a long-term deferred tax asset. The majority of this deferred tax asset is offset in our balance sheet by the $30.7 million deferred tax liability that was recognized with the adoption of the updates to Accounting Standards Codification 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (ASC 470-20) that were retroactively applied to May 16, 2007 (see below for additional information on the impact of adopting the updates to ASC 470-20).
On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACIs common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options are anti-dilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted shares outstanding. The Warrants will result in additional diluted shares outstanding if our average common stock price exceeds $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind us and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.
Beginning July 1, 2009, we have accounted for the Notes in accordance with the updates to ASC 470-20. These new rules were applied retrospectively and, accordingly, balances affected by ASC 470-20 as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2009, have been adjusted to reflect the impacts of the update. The effects on prior period balances are described in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included with this quarterly report.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company accounts for the liability and the equity (conversion option) components of the Notes, and recognizes expense on the Notes, using an interest rate in effect for comparable debt instruments that do not contain conversion features. The effective interest rate for the Notes excluding its conversion option was determined to be 6.9 percent.
The fair value of the liability component of the Notes was calculated to be $221.9 million at May 16, 2007, the date of issuance. The excess of the $300.0 million of gross proceeds over the $221.9 million fair value of the liability component, or $78.1 million, represents the fair value of the equity component, which has been recorded, net of income tax effect, as additional paid-in capital within shareholders equity. This $78.1 million difference represents a debt discount that is amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes as a non-cash component of interest expense. While the new rules cause reported interest expense to increase, and correspondingly cause basic and diluted earnings per share to decrease, they have no effect on net cash flows.
We also maintain two lines of credit in addition to the Revolving Facility, one in the U.K., and one under a joint venture. The total amount available under the line-of-credit facility in the U.K., which is cancelable at any time upon notice from the bank, is 0.5 million pounds sterling. The amount available under the joint ventures line of credit is $1.5 million, and is scheduled to expire in September 2011. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under either of these lines of credit.
Cash and cash equivalents were $174.7 million and $208.5 million at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Our operating cash flow was $122.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $94.3 million in the same period a year ago. This increase in operating cash flows during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the year earlier quarter is due primarily to the profits earned during the current year quarter and our strong operational processes. Days-sales-outstanding were 59 at March 31, 2010, and were 61 at March 31, 2009.
32
We used cash in investing activities of $107.6 million and $17.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase of $90.2 million was primarily the result of acquisitions completed during the first nine months of the year ending June 30, 2010 and capital expenditures incurred in connection with our consolidation of office space in a new building in Northern Virginia.
Cash used in financing activities was $46.4 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $20.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2009. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, we prepaid $50.0 million of our Term Loan. During the nine months ended March 31 2009, we used $20.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to a plan approved by our Board of Directors in June 2008.
Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan totaling $9.1 million and $6.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts were offset by cash used to purchase stock to fulfill obligations under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which totaled $2.6 million and $2.8 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under our Credit Facility and the Notes will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including current worldwide economic conditions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We use off-balance sheet arrangements to finance the lease of operating facilities. We have financed the use of all of our current office and warehouse facilities through operating leases. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue financing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such period. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. As of March 31, 2010, we had no outstanding letters of credit. We have no other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps and caps. We have maintained hedging relationships with various counterparties in recent years, including two interest rate swap agreements that expired in December 2009. These agreements allowed us to exchange a portion of our variable rate debt for fixed rate debt. We have not entered into new interest rate swaps at this time due to the relatively favorable interest rate environment, and as our variable rate debt is schedule to mature in May 2011. Accordingly, effective in mid-December 2009, all outstanding balances under our Term Loan, and any amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are subject to interest rate fluctuations. Without interest rate swap agreements, our interest expense on our variable rate debt could have fluctuated by approximately $2.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 with every 1 percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rates.
Our outstanding hedging relationship is with a financial institution that has been impacted by recent market conditions. If this financial institution defaults on its obligations under our cap agreement, we would have to find alternative methods to manage interest rate fluctuations or review and modify our hedging strategy. We believe that this financial institution will be able to fulfill its obligations, if any, under the cap agreement.
Approximately 3.9 percent and 3.0 percent of our total revenue in the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from our international operations in the U.K. Our practice in the U.K. is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency
33
exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As of March 31, 2010, we held pounds sterling in the U.K. equivalent to approximately $9.9 million. This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of the three month period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitation, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to appropriate levels of management.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2010.
The Company reports that no changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
34
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Saleh, et al. v. Titan Corp., et al.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, against CACI International Inc, CACI, INC.FEDERAL, CACI N.V., and former CACI employee Stephen A. Stefanowicz, among other defendants, seeking a permanent injunction, declaratory relief, compensatory and punitive damages, treble damages and attorneys fees arising out of defendants alleged acts against plaintiffs, who were detainees at Abu Ghraib prison and elsewhere in Iraq.
Since the filing of Registrants report described above, on September 11, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia with respect to CACI and dismissed the remaining claims against CACI. On January 25, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied plaintiffs petition for a rehearing en banc. On April 26, 2010, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court to review the September 11, 2009 decision of the Court of Appeals.
Ibrahim, et al. v. Titan Corp., et al.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against CACI International Inc, CACI, INC.FEDERAL, CACI N.V. and Titan Corporation, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for physical injury, emotional distress, and/or wrongful death allegedly suffered as a result of defendants wrongful acts against plaintiffs, who were detainees at Abu Ghraib prison and elsewhere in Iraq.
Since the filing of Registrants report described above, on September 11, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia with respect to CACI and dismissed the remaining claims against CACI. On January 25, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied plaintiffs petition for a rehearing en banc. On April 26, 2010, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court to review the September 11, 2009 decision of the Court of Appeals.
Al Shimari, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceeding in the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys fees.
Since the filing of Registrants report described above, the parties received a briefing schedule from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit with respect to CACIs appeal of the March 2009 decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Plaintiffs moved to dismiss CACIs appeal. The Court of Appeals has deferred any ruling on plaintiffs motion. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a notice of cross-appeal, which CACI has moved to dismiss. The Court of Appeals dismissed plaintiffs cross-appeal. On April 5, 2010, CACI filed its opening brief in the appeal.
35
Abbas, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceeding in the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit names CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and L-3 Services, Inc. as defendants. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages and costs.
Since the filing of Registrants report described above, the case is still stayed pending final resolution of the Saleh and Ibrahim cases described above.
We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and, based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.
36
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in that report other than as set forth below.
Change in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration could materially impact our results of operations. We made significant judgments in determining the acquisition-date assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the acquisitions we made subsequent to June 30, 2009 and similar judgments will be made as we revalue their fair value each reporting period. Our future operating results could be materially impacted if actual earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization of the acquired businesses vary from our estimates.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Set forth below are equity securities purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2010 in order to satisfy our obligations under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |||||
January 2010 |
18,132 | $ | 47.85 | 698,769 | 301,231 | ||||
February 2010 |
| | | | |||||
March 2010 |
| | | | |||||
Total |
18,132 | $ | 47.85 | 698,769 | 301,231 | ||||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) |
None
Item 5. | Other Information |
None
37
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||
Exhibit No. |
Description |
Filed with |
Form |
Filing Date |
Exhibit | |||||
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of CACI International Inc, as amended to date | 10-K | September 13, 2006 | 3.1 | ||||||
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-laws of CACI International Inc, amended as of March 5, 2008 | 8-K | March 7, 2008 | 3.1 | ||||||
4.1 | Clause FOURTH of CACI International Incs Certificate of Incorporation incorporated above as Exhibit 3.1 | 10-K | September 13, 2006 | 4.1 | ||||||
4.2 | The Rights Agreement dated July 11, 2003 between CACI International Inc and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company | 8-K | July 11, 2003 | 4.1 | ||||||
31.1 | Section 302 Certification Paul M. Cofoni | X | ||||||||
31.2 | Section 302 Certification Thomas A. Mutryn | X | ||||||||
32.1 | Section 906 Certification Paul M. Cofoni | X | ||||||||
32.2 | Section 906 Certification Thomas A. Mutryn | X |
38
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
CACI International Inc | ||||
Registrant | ||||
Date: May 5, 2010 | By: | /S/ PAUL M. COFONI | ||
Paul M. Cofoni | ||||
President, | ||||
Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Date: May 5, 2010 | By: | /S/ THOMAS A. MUTRYN | ||
Thomas A. Mutryn | ||||
Executive Vice President, | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
Date: May 5, 2010 | By: | /S/ CAROL P. HANNA | ||
Carol P. Hanna | ||||
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller | ||||
and Chief Accounting Officer | ||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
39