DD-2013.9.30-10Q
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
 
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-815
 
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
 
51-0014090
(State or other Jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)
 
Identification No.)
1007 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19898
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(302) 774-1000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x   No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files.)  Yes  x   No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer x
 
Accelerated Filer o
 
 
 
Non-Accelerated Filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No  x

The Registrant had 926,103,000 shares (excludes 87,041,000 shares of treasury stock) of common stock, $0.30 par value, outstanding at October 15, 2013.
 
 

Table of Contents

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

Table of Contents
 
The terms “DuPont” or the “company” as used herein refer to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, or to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, as the context may indicate. 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2
Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Income Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share)
 
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net sales
$
7,735

$
7,390

$
27,987

$
27,487

Other income (loss), net
70

(54
)
321

251

Total
7,805

7,336

28,308

27,738

Cost of goods sold
5,165

4,779

17,415

16,558

Other operating charges
990

937

2,843

3,064

Selling, general and administrative expenses
774

764

2,740

2,691

Research and development expense
540

521

1,603

1,562

Interest expense
108

116

340

347

Employee separation / asset related charges, net
—

394

—

394

Total
7,577

7,511

24,941

24,616

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
228

(175
)
3,367

3,122

(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations
(35
)
(135
)
687

654

Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes
263

(40
)
2,680

2,468

Income from discontinued operations after income taxes
25

48

1,997

219

Net income
288

8

4,677

2,687

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
3

3

14

24

Net income attributable to DuPont
$
285

$
5

$
4,663

$
2,663

Basic earnings (loss) per share of common stock:
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share of common stock from continuing operations
$
0.28

$
(0.05
)
$
2.87

$
2.61

Basic earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations
0.03

0.05

2.16

0.24

Basic earnings per share of common stock
$
0.30

$
—

$
5.03

$
2.85

Diluted earnings (loss) per share of common stock:
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share of common stock from continuing operations
$
0.28

$
(0.05
)
$
2.85

$
2.58

Diluted earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations
0.03

0.05

2.14

0.23

Diluted earnings per share of common stock
$
0.30

$
—

$
4.99

$
2.82

Dividends per share of common stock
$
0.45

$
0.43

$
1.33

$
1.27

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.



3
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
288

$
8

$
4,677

$
2,687

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
 
 
 
 
      Cumulative translation adjustment
177

189

(46
)
(53
)
      Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings:
 
 
 
 
      Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(15
)
(6
)
(39
)
30

      Clearance of hedge results to earnings
1

(11
)
(27
)
(66
)
      Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(14
)
(17
)
(66
)
(36
)
      Pension benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
      Net (loss) gain
(4
)
(609
)
52

(628
)
      Prior service benefit
62

—

62

22

      Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
                Amortization of prior service cost
2

3

8

10

                Amortization of loss
244

222

724

661

                Curtailment / settlement loss
—

2

153

2

      Pension benefit plans, net
304

(382
)
999

67

      Other benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
      Net gain (loss)
95

(141
)
140

(141
)
Prior service benefit
199

857

199

857

      Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
                Amortization of prior service benefit
(48
)
(44
)
(142
)
(104
)
                Amortization of loss
26

24

51

68

                Curtailment / settlement loss (gain)
—

3

(153
)
3

      Other benefit plans, net
272

699

95

683

      Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities
—

(5
)
1

(3
)
Other comprehensive income, before tax
739

484

983

658

      Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
(195
)
(126
)
(337
)
(266
)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
544

358

646

392

Comprehensive income
832

366

5,323

3,079

      Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
3

3

14

51

Comprehensive income attributable to DuPont
$
829

$
363

$
5,309

$
3,028


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.


4
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share) 
 
September 30,
2013
December 31,
2012
Assets
 

 

Current assets
 

 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
7,005

$
4,284

Marketable securities
184

123

Accounts and notes receivable, net
8,298

5,452

Inventories
7,031

7,565

Prepaid expenses
185

204

Deferred income taxes
840

613

Assets held for sale
—

3,076

Total current assets
23,543

21,317

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
   (September 30, 2013 - $19,779; December 31, 2012 - $19,085)
12,908

12,741

Goodwill
4,718

4,616

Other intangible assets
5,135

5,126

Investment in affiliates
1,054

1,163

Deferred income taxes
3,739

3,936

Other assets
893

960

Total
$
51,990

$
49,859

Liabilities and Equity
 

 

Current liabilities
 

 

Accounts payable
$
3,876

$
4,853

Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations
4,204

1,275

Income taxes
442

343

Other accrued liabilities
3,874

5,997

Liabilities related to assets held for sale
—

1,084

Total current liabilities
12,396

13,552

Long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations
10,755

10,465

Other liabilities
13,901

14,687

Deferred income taxes
973

856

Total liabilities
38,025

39,560

Commitments and contingent liabilities




Redeemable noncontrolling interest
65

—

Stockholders’ equity
 

 

Preferred stock
237

237

Common stock, $0.30 par value; 1,800,000,000 shares authorized;
   Issued at September 30, 2013 - 1,013,111,000; December 31, 2012 - 1,020,057,000
304

306

Additional paid-in capital
11,007

10,655

Reinvested earnings
17,020

14,383

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(8,000
)
(8,646
)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost
   (87,041,000 shares at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012)
(6,727
)
(6,727
)
Total DuPont stockholders’ equity
13,841

10,208

Noncontrolling interests
59

91

Total equity
13,900

10,299

Total
$
51,990

$
49,859

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.

5
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
2013
2012
Operating activities
 

 

Net income
$
4,677

$
2,687

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used for operating activities:
 

 

Depreciation
961

1,047

Amortization of intangible assets
255

266

Other operating charges and credits - net
447

907

Gain on sale of business
(2,689
)
—

Contributions to pension plans
(246
)
(762
)
Change in operating assets and liabilities - net
(5,738
)
(4,571
)
Cash used for operating activities
(2,333
)
(426
)
Investing activities
 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(1,223
)
(1,139
)
Investments in affiliates
(43
)
(31
)
Payments for businesses - net of cash acquired
(133
)
(18
)
Proceeds from sale of business - net
4,816

—

Proceeds from sales of assets - net
126

175

Net (increase) decrease in short-term financial instruments
(78
)
336

Forward exchange contract settlements
82

23

Other investing activities - net
31

(13
)
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities
3,578

(667
)
Financing activities
 

 

Dividends paid to stockholders
(1,242
)
(1,191
)
Net increase in borrowings
3,204

2,524

Repurchase of common stock
(1,000
)
(400
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
497

520

Payments for noncontrolling interest
—

(447
)
Other financing activities - net
3

38

Cash provided by financing activities
1,462

1,044

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(81
)
(23
)
Cash classified as held for sale
—

(96
)
Increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
2,626

$
(168
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
4,379

3,586

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
7,005

$
3,418

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.


6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)


Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods have been included.  Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of results for a full year.  These interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, collectively referred to as the “2012 Annual Report”.  The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the company and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained, as well as variable interest entities for which DuPont is the primary beneficiary. 

Basis of Presentation
Certain reclassifications of prior year's data have been made to conform to current year's presentation, including separately stating cost of goods sold and other operating charges on the interim Consolidated Income Statements. In the third quarter 2012, the company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Performance Coatings business (which represented a reportable segment). In accordance with GAAP, the results of Performance Coatings are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented. The sum of the individual earnings per share amounts from continuing and discontinued operations may not equal the total company earnings per share amounts due to rounding. The assets and liabilities of Performance Coatings at December 31, 2012 are presented as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The cash flows and comprehensive income related to Performance Coatings have not been segregated and are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Comprehensive Income, respectively, for all periods presented. Amounts related to Performance Coatings are consistently included in or excluded from the Notes to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements based on the financial statement line item and period of each disclosure. See Note 2 for additional information.

Change in Accounting Policy
Effective January 1, 2013, the company changed its method of valuing inventory held at a majority of its foreign and certain United States locations from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the average cost method. The company believes that the average cost method is preferable to the LIFO method as it more clearly aligns with how the company actually manages its inventory and will improve financial reporting by better matching revenues and expenses. In addition, the change from LIFO to average cost will enhance the comparability of our financial results with our peer companies. As described in the guidance for accounting changes, the comparative interim Consolidated Financial Statements of prior periods are adjusted to apply the new accounting method retrospectively.

The following line items within the interim Consolidated Income Statements were affected by the change in accounting policy for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
As reported
As reported under LIFO
Change:
(Decrease)/Increase
As reported
As reported under LIFO
Change:
(Decrease)/Increase
 
Cost of goods sold
$
5,165

$
5,176

$
(11
)
$
17,415

$
17,447

$
(32
)
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
228

217

11

3,367

3,335

32

 
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations
(35
)
(38
)
3

687

678

9

 
Income from continuing operations after income taxes
263

255

8

2,680

2,657

23

 
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes
25

25

—

1,997

1,997

—

 
Net income
$
288

$
280

$
8

$
4,677

$
4,654

$
23



7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)



Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations increased by $0.01 and $0.02 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, as a result of the above accounting policy change.

 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2012
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
 
 
 
As reported
As reported under LIFO
Change:
(Decrease)/Increase
As reported
As reported under LIFO
Change:
(Decrease)/Increase
 
Cost of goods sold
$
4,779

$
4,778

$
1

$
16,558

$
16,549

$
9

 
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
(175
)
(174
)
(1
)
3,122

3,131

(9
)
 
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations
(135
)
(134
)
(1
)
654

657

(3
)
 
(Loss) income from continuing operations after income taxes
(40
)
(40
)
—

2,468

2,474

(6
)
 
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes
48

53

(5
)
219

227

(8
)
 
Net income
$
8

$
13

$
(5
)
$
2,687

$
2,701

$
(14
)

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations decreased by $(0.01) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of the above accounting policy change.

Inventory and Stockholder's Equity increased by $143 and $120, respectively, as of January 1, 2012, as a result of the above accounting policy change.

There was no impact on cash used by operating activities as a result of the above change.

Note 2. Discontinued Operations
In February 2013, the company sold its Performance Coatings business to Flash Bermuda Co. Ltd., a Bermuda exempted limited liability company formed by affiliates of The Carlyle Group (collectively referred to as "Carlyle"). The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $2,689 ($1,964 net of tax). The gain was recorded in income from discontinued operations after income taxes in the company's interim Consolidated Income Statements for the nine-months ended September 30, 2013.

The results of discontinued operations are summarized below:
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net sales
$
—

$
1,039

$
331

$
3,178

Income before income taxes
$
7

$
158

$
2,720

$
426

(Benefit from) provision for income taxes1
(18
)
110

723

207

Income from discontinued operations after income taxes
$
25

$
48

$
1,997

$
219


1  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 included expense of $62 to accrue taxes associated with earnings of certain Performance Coatings subsidiaries that were previously considered permanently reinvested as these entities were reclassified as held for sale.









8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)



The key components of the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012 related to Performance Coatings consisted of the following:
 
December 31,
2012
Cash and cash equivalents
$
95

Accounts and notes receivable, net
783

Inventories
488

Prepaid expenses
6

Deferred income taxes - current
32

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
749

Goodwill
808

Other intangible assets
67

Deferred income taxes - noncurrent
14

Other assets - noncurrent
34

Total assets held for sale
$
3,076

Accounts payable
$
408

Income taxes
17

Other accrued liabilities
237

Other liabilities - noncurrent
388

Deferred income taxes - noncurrent
34

Total liabilities related to assets held for sale
$
1,084


Note 3. Employee Separation /Asset Related Charges, Net
2012 Restructuring Program
At September 30, 2013, total liabilities relating to the 2012 restructuring program were $91. A complete discussion of restructuring initiatives is included in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 3, "Employee Separation/Asset Related Charges, Net".

Account balances for the 2012 restructuring program are summarized below:

 
Employee Separation Costs
Other Non-Personnel Charges1
Total
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
154

$
7

$
161

Payments
(66
)
(3
)
(69
)
Net translation adjustment
(1
)
—

(1
)
Balance as of September 30, 2013
$
87

$
4

$
91


1 
Other non-personnel charges consist of contractual obligation costs.

The company expects this plan and all related payments to be substantially complete by December 31, 2013.


9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Asset Impairments
During the third quarter 2012, as a result of conditions in the thin film photovoltaic market, the company determined that an impairment triggering event had occurred and that an assessment of the asset group related to its thin film photovoltaic modules and systems was warranted. This assessment determined that the carrying value of the asset group exceeded its fair value. The basis of the fair value was calculated utilizing a discounted cash flow approach which included assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual cash flows. As a result of our impairment test, a $150 pre-tax impairment charge was recorded at September 30, 2012. The charge was recorded within the Electronics & Communications segment.
During the third quarter 2012, as a result of deteriorating conditions in an industrial polymer market, the company determined that an impairment triggering event had occurred and that an assessment of the asset group related to this polymer product was warranted. This assessment determined that the carrying value of the asset group exceeded its fair value. The basis of the fair value was calculated utilizing a discounted cash flow approach which included assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual cash flows. As a result of our impairment test, a $92 pre-tax impairment charge was recorded at September 30, 2012. The charge was recorded within the Performance Materials segment.
In connection with the matters discussed above, at September 30, 2012, the company had long-lived assets with a remaining net book value of approximately $125 accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition. These nonrecurring fair value measurements were determined using level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies".

Note 4.  Other Income, Net 
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Cozaar®/Hyzaar® income
$
—

$
9

$
14

$
48

Royalty income
35

21

122

84

Interest income
34

27

106

87

Equity in earnings of affiliates, excluding exchange gains/losses
28

11

14

42

Gain on sale of equity method investment
—

—

9

122

Net gain on sales of other assets
7

1

17

11

Net exchange losses1
(101
)
(130
)
(55
)
(161
)
Miscellaneous income and expenses, net 2
67

7

94

18

Other income (loss), net
$
70

$
(54
)
$
321

$
251

 

1 
The company routinely uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The objective of this program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies in order to minimize, on an after-tax basis, the effects of exchange rate changes on net monetary asset positions. The net pre-tax exchange gains (losses) are recorded in other income, net and the related tax impact is recorded in provision for income taxes on continuing operations on the interim Consolidated Income Statements. The $(55) net exchange loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, includes a $(33) exchange loss, associated with the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar.
2  
Miscellaneous income and expenses, net, generally includes interest items, certain insurance recoveries and litigation settlements, and other items.


10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 5.  Income Taxes 
In the third quarter 2013, the company recorded a tax benefit of $35 on continuing operations pre-tax income of $228. The benefit included $58 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations.

Year-to-date 2013, the company recorded a tax provision on continuing operations of $687, including $8 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. Included in the provision was a $33 tax benefit related to an enacted foreign tax law change, a $68 tax benefit derived from the 2013 extension of certain U.S. business tax provisions partially offset by $49 of tax expense related to a change in accrual for a prior year tax position and $26 of tax expense related to the global distribution of the proceeds from the sale of the Performance Coatings business.

In the third quarter 2012, the company recorded a tax benefit of $135 on the pre-tax loss from continuing operations of $175. The benefit included $71 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations.

Year-to-date 2012, the company recorded a tax provision on continuing operations of $654, including $48 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations.

Each year the company files hundreds of tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the taxing authorities. Positions challenged by the taxing authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the company’s financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. It is reasonably possible that changes to the company’s global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant, however, due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made.


11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 6.  Earnings Per Share of Common Stock 
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations for the periods indicated:
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes attributable to DuPont
$
260

$
(43
)
$
2,666

$
2,444

Preferred dividends
(3
)
(3
)
(8
)
(8
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes available to DuPont common stockholders
$
257

$
(46
)
$
2,658

$
2,436

 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes
$
25

$
48

$
1,997

$
219

 
 
 
 
 
Net income available to common stockholders
$
282

$
2

$
4,655

$
2,655

 
 
 
 
 
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - Basic
925,645,000

931,737,000

925,548,000

933,227,000

Dilutive effect of the company’s employee compensation plans1
7,360,000

8,789,000

6,994,000

9,297,000

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted
933,005,000

940,526,000

932,542,000

942,524,000


1 
Dilutive effect of the company's employee compensation plans are excluded from calculation of dilutive loss per share of common stock from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

The following average number of stock options were antidilutive, and therefore, were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations: 
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Average number of stock options
—

12,631,000

3,461,000

12,035,000

 
The change in the average number of stock options that were antidilutive in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period last year was primarily due to changes in the company’s average stock price.

Note 7. Inventories 
 
September 30,
2013
December 31,
2012
Finished products
$
3,857

$
4,449

Semi-finished products
2,443

2,407

Raw materials, stores and supplies
1,323

1,313

 
7,623

8,169

Adjustment of inventories to a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis
(592
)
(604
)
Total
$
7,031

$
7,565



12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 8.  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 
There were no significant changes in goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets by major class are as follows: 
 
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
 
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Intangible assets subject to amortization (Definite-lived):
 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer lists
$
1,844

$
(397
)
$
1,447

$
1,847

$
(330
)
$
1,517

Patents
531

(164
)
367

525

(127
)
398

Purchased and licensed technology
2,021

(1,140
)
881

1,929

(1,016
)
913

Trademarks
57

(31
)
26

57

(29
)
28

Other 1
221

(107
)
114

206

(98
)
108

 
4,674

(1,839
)
2,835

4,564

(1,600
)
2,964

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets not subject to amortization (Indefinite-lived):
 

 

 

 

 

 

In-process research and development
71

—

71

62

—

62

Microbial cell factories 2
306

—

306

306

—

306

Pioneer germplasm 3
1,053

—

1,053

975

—

975

Trademarks/tradenames
870

—

870

819

—

819

 
2,300

—

2,300

2,162

—

2,162

Total
$
6,974

$
(1,839
)
$
5,135

$
6,726

$
(1,600
)
$
5,126


1  
Primarily consists of sales and grower networks, marketing and manufacturing alliances and noncompetition agreements.
2  
Microbial cell factories, derived from natural microbes, are used to sustainably produce enzymes, peptides and chemicals using natural metabolic processes. The company recognized the microbial cell factories as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Danisco. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life.
3  
Pioneer germplasm is the pool of genetic source material and body of knowledge gained from the development and delivery stage of plant breeding. The company recognized germplasm as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Pioneer. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life.       

The aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for definite-lived intangible assets was $62 and $255 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $62 and $247 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The estimated aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for the remainder of 2013 and each of the next five years is approximately $52, $348, $366, $318, $187 and $181, respectively, which are primarily reported in cost of goods sold.
                                                                                                           


13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 9.  Commitments and Contingent Liabilities 
Guarantees 
Indemnifications
In connection with acquisitions and divestitures, the company has indemnified respective parties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with these transactions and business activities prior to the completion of the transaction. The term of these indemnifications, which typically pertain to environmental, tax and product liabilities, is generally indefinite. In addition, the company indemnifies its duly elected or appointed directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, against liabilities incurred as a result of their activities for the company, such as adverse judgments relating to litigation matters. If the indemnified party were to incur a liability or have a liability increase as a result of a successful claim, pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, the company would be required to reimburse the indemnified party. The maximum amount of potential future payments is generally unlimited.

Obligations for Equity Affiliates & Others 
The company has directly guaranteed various debt obligations under agreements with third parties related to equity affiliates, customers and suppliers. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the company had directly guaranteed $502 and $535, respectively, of such obligations. These amounts represent the maximum potential amount of future (undiscounted) payments that the company could be required to make under the guarantees. The company would be required to perform on these guarantees in the event of default by the guaranteed party.

The company assesses the payment/performance risk by assigning default rates based on the duration of the guarantees. These default rates are assigned based on the external credit rating of the counterparty or through internal credit analysis and historical default history for counterparties that do not have published credit ratings. For counterparties without an external rating or available credit history, a cumulative average default rate is used.

In certain cases, the company has recourse to assets held as collateral, as well as personal guarantees from customers and suppliers. Assuming liquidation, these assets are estimated to cover 44 percent of the $320 of guaranteed obligations of customers and suppliers. Set forth below are the company's guaranteed obligations at September 30, 2013:
 
Short-Term
Long-Term
Total
Obligations for customers and suppliers1:
 

 

 

Bank borrowings (terms up to 7 years)
$
187

$
132

$
319

Leases on equipment and facilities (terms up to 4 years)
—

1

1

Obligations for equity affiliates2:
 

 

 

Bank borrowings (terms less than 2 years)
181

1

182

Total
$
368

$
134

$
502


1 
Existing guarantees for customers and suppliers, as part of contractual agreements.
2   
Existing guarantees for equity affiliates' liquidity needs in normal operations.

Imprelis® 
The company has received claims and has been served with multiple lawsuits alleging that the use of Imprelis® herbicide caused damage to certain trees. Sales of Imprelis® were suspended in August 2011 and the product was last applied during the 2011 spring application season. The lawsuits seeking class action status have been consolidated in multidistrict litigation in federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

In February 2013, the court granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement. The settlement incorporates the company's existing claims process and provides certain additional relief. The proposed settlement class includes affected property owners and lawn care companies who do not "opt out" of the settlement. As part of the settlement, DuPont will pay about $7 in plaintiffs' attorney fees and expenses. In addition, DuPont is providing a warranty against new damage, if any, caused by the use of Imprelis® on class members' properties through May 2015. The settlement notification process began on March 25, 2013 and ended on June 28, 2013 which was also the last day to “opt out” of the settlement or file a new claim. The final approval hearing was held on September 27, 2013 and on October 17, 2013, the court issued an order approving the settlement. In addition, about 125 individual actions encompassing about 400 claims for property damage have been filed in state court in various jurisdictions. DuPont has removed most of these cases to federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Once removed to federal court, the individual actions remain stayed pending further action by the court.


14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

The company has established review processes to verify and evaluate damage claims. There are several variables that impact the evaluation process including the number of trees on a property, the species of tree with reported damage, the height of the tree, the extent of damage and the possibility for trees to naturally recover over time. Upon receiving claims, DuPont verifies their accuracy and validity which often requires physical review of the property.

At September 30, 2013, DuPont had recorded charges of $930, within other operating charges, to resolve these claims. The three months ended September 30, 2013 included net charges of $40, consisting of a $65 charge offset by $25 of insurance recoveries. The nine months ended September 30, 2013 included net charges of $155, consisting of charges of $180 offset by $25 of insurance recoveries received in the third quarter 2013. The three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 included charges of $125 and $440, respectively. The company currently estimates that total charges could be about $1,200; however, there is a high degree of uncertainty. Predicting the impact of Imprelis® on living organisms and how those organisms may react over time as well as variability regarding the extended warranty period under the class action settlement are significant factors driving the uncertainty of future charges. Imprelis® was applied throughout the United States and the ability of any particular species of tree to naturally recover over time may be different depending on the property's geography and associated climate. The company has an applicable insurance program with a deductible equal to the first $100 of costs and expenses. The insurance program limits are $725 for costs and expenses in excess of the $100. DuPont has submitted and will continue to submit requests for payment to its insurance carriers for costs associated with this matter. The company has begun to receive payment from its insurance carriers and continues to seek recovery although the timing and outcome remain uncertain.

Litigation
The company is subject to various legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of its business including product liability, intellectual property, commercial, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. Except as otherwise noted, management does not anticipate their resolution will have a materially adverse effect on the company's consolidated financial position or liquidity.  However, the ultimate liabilities could be significant to results of operations in the period recognized.  

PFOA 
DuPont used PFOA (collectively, perfluorooctanoic acids and its salts, including the ammonium salt), as a processing aid to manufacture some fluoropolymer resins at various sites around the world including its Washington Works plant in West Virginia. At September 30, 2013, DuPont has accruals of $15 related to the PFOA matters discussed below.

The accrual includes charges related to DuPont's obligations under agreements with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and voluntary commitments to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.  These obligations include surveying, sampling and testing drinking water in and around certain company sites and offering treatment or an alternative supply of drinking water if tests indicate the presence of PFOA in drinking water at or greater than the national Provisional Health Advisory.

Drinking Water Actions
In August 2001, a class action, captioned Leach v DuPont, was filed in West Virginia state court alleging that residents living near the Washington Works facility had suffered, or may suffer, deleterious health effects from exposure to PFOA in drinking water.

DuPont and attorneys for the class reached a settlement in 2004 that binds about 80,000 residents. In 2005, DuPont paid the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses of $23 and made a payment of $70, which class counsel designated to fund a community health project.  The company funded a series of health studies which were completed in October 2012 by an independent science panel of experts (the “C8 Science Panel”). The studies were conducted in communities exposed to PFOA to evaluate available scientific evidence on whether any probable link exists, as defined in the settlement agreement, between exposure to PFOA and human disease.

The C8 Science Panel found probable links, as defined in the settlement agreement, between exposure to PFOA and pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia; kidney cancer; testicular cancer; thyroid disease; ulcerative colitis; and diagnosed high cholesterol.


15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

In May 2013, a panel of three independent medical doctors released its initial recommendations for screening and diagnostic testing of eligible class members. The medical panel is expected to address monitoring and may make additional recommendations in a subsequent report.  The medical panel has not communicated its anticipated schedule for completion. The company is obligated to fund up to $235 for a medical monitoring program for eligible class members.  In January 2012, the company put $1 in an escrow account to fund medical monitoring as required by the settlement agreement.  The court has appointed a Medical Monitoring Director to implement the medical panel's recommendations who is in the process of setting up a program.  Testing has not yet begun and no money has been disbursed from the fund.  While it is probable that the company will incur losses related to funding the medical monitoring program, such losses cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties surrounding implementation.

In addition, the company must continue to provide water treatment designed to reduce the level of PFOA in water to six area water districts, including the Little Hocking Water Association (LHWA), and private well users.

Additional Actions
An Ohio action brought by the LHWA is ongoing. In addition to general claims of PFOA contamination of drinking water, the action claims “imminent and substantial endangerment to health and or the environment” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). DuPont denies these claims and is defending itself vigorously.

Class members may pursue personal injury claims against DuPont only for those human diseases for which the C8 Science Panel determined a probable link exists. At September 30, 2013, 45 lawsuits alleging personal injury and 2 lawsuits alleging wrongful death from exposure to PFOA in drinking water are pending in federal court in Ohio and West Virginia. This is an increase in pending cases of 1 and 21 over the second quarter 2013 and year end 2012, respectively. These cases have been consolidated for discovery purposes in multi-district litigation in Ohio federal court. DuPont denies the allegations in these lawsuits and is defending itself vigorously.

While DuPont believes that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to these additional actions, a range of such losses, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

Monsanto Patent Dispute
On August 1, 2012, a St. Louis, Missouri jury awarded $1,000 in damages to Monsanto on its claims that the company willfully infringed Monsanto's RE 39,247 patent directed to Roundup® Ready® 1 glyphosate herbicide tolerance soybean seed technology.

Monsanto alleged that by combining Pioneer's Optimum® GAT® trait with Monsanto's patented Roundup® Ready® trait, Pioneer violated its 2002 Amended and Restated Roundup® Ready® Soybean License Agreement and, in doing so, infringed Monsanto's RE 39,247 patent. The company has never sold soybeans containing a combination of the Optimum® GAT® and Roundup® Ready® traits and discontinued in 2011 its commercialization efforts for such soybeans.

In March 2013, Pioneer and Monsanto entered into technology license agreements. As part of those agreements, the company received, among other things, a non-exclusive royalty bearing license in the United States and Canada for Monsanto's Genuity® Roundup Ready 2 Yield® glyphosate tolerance trait and its dicamba tolerance trait for soybeans, post-patent regulatory access and maintenance support for Roundup Ready® 1 glyphosate tolerance trait for soybeans, Genuity® Roundup Ready 2 glyphosate tolerance trait for corn and YieldGard® corn borer insect resistance trait. The agreements require the company to make a series of up-front and variable payments subject to Monsanto delivering enabling soybean genetic material. Total annual fixed royalty payments of $802 contemplated under the arrangement for trait technology, associated data and soybean lines to support commercial introduction are expected to come due in years 2014 - 2017. Additionally, beginning in 2018, DuPont will pay royalties on a per unit basis related to the Genuity® Roundup Ready 2 Yield® and dicamba tolerance traits for the life of the license, subject to annual minimum payments through 2023 totaling $950.

In a separate agreement, the company agreed to dismiss with prejudice its antitrust claims against Monsanto in exchange for a dismissal with prejudice of Monsanto's patent infringement claims and the related damages verdict. Accordingly, as of the first quarter 2013 this matter was resolved, but for the court-ordered sanctions against the company for “fraud against the court.” The court unsealed the order in November 2012. The parties agreed to present the sanctions and related rulings for immediate appeal and those matters are presently on appeal.


16
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
In February 2010, two suits were filed in Maryland federal district court alleging conspiracy among DuPont, Huntsman International LLC, Kronos Worldwide Inc., Millenium Inorganics Chemicals Inc. and others to fix prices of titanium dioxide sold in the United States between March 2002 and the present. The cases were subsequently consolidated and in August 2012, the court certified a class consisting of United States customers that have directly purchased titanium dioxide since February 1, 2003.

During the third quarter 2013, DuPont and plaintiffs agreed to settle this matter, subject to court approval. In connection therewith, the company has recorded charges of $72, within other operating charges, at September 30, 2013. The settlement explicitly acknowledges that DuPont denies all allegations and does not admit liability. The court has preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled the final approval hearing for November 25, 2013.
Environmental 
The company is also subject to contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the company to take further action to correct the effects on the environment of prior disposal practices or releases of chemical or petroleum substances by the company or other parties. The company accrues for environmental remediation activities consistent with the policy as described in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Much of this liability results from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, often referred to as Superfund), RCRA and similar state and global laws. These laws require the company to undertake certain investigative, remediation and restoration activities at sites where the company conducts or once conducted operations or at sites where company-generated waste was disposed. The accrual also includes estimated costs related to a number of sites identified by the company for which it is probable that environmental remediation will be required, but which are not currently the subject of enforcement activities.

Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site. These activities, and their associated costs, depend on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, as well as the presence or absence of potentially responsible parties. At September 30, 2013, the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included a liability of $456, relating to these matters and, in management's opinion, is appropriate based on existing facts and circumstances. The average time frame over which the accrued or presently unrecognized amounts may be paid, based on past history, is estimated to be 15-20 years. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to these costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, potential liability may range up to three times the amount accrued as of September 30, 2013.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
On July 31, 2013, the company acquired a controlling interest in Pannar Seed Pty. Ltd (Pannar). As part of the acquisition, the minority shareholders of Pannar have the right, at any time, to exercise a put option requiring the company to purchase the remaining equity interest at a price based on a specified formula. Due to this redemption feature, the minority shareholders interest is classified outside of Stockholders’ equity under the caption “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. At September 30, 2013, the carrying amount of the Redeemable noncontrolling interest approximates the estimated redemption value. In October 2013, the company received notice that the minority shareholders exercised their put option. As the exercise does not result in a change in control of Pannar, the exercise of the put option will be accounted for as an equity transaction during the fourth quarter.
Note 10.  Stockholders’ Equity 
Share Repurchase Program
In December 2012, the company's Board of Directors authorized a $1,000 share buyback plan. In February 2013, the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with a financial institution under which the company used $1,000 of the proceeds from the sale of Performance Coatings for the purchase of shares of common stock. The 2012 $1,000 share buyback plan was completed in the second quarter 2013 through the ASR agreement, under which the company purchased and retired 20.4 million shares.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the company paid $400 for the purchase and receipt of shares of common stock. During 2012, the company purchased and retired 7.8 million shares in connection with this agreement. These purchases completed the 2001 $2,000 share buyback plan and began purchases under the 2011 $2,000 share buyback plan authorized by the company's Board of Directors in April 2011. Under the completed 2001 plan, the company purchased a total of 42.0 million shares. Under the 2011 plan, the company has purchased 5.5 million shares at a total cost of $284 as of September 30, 2013. There is no required completion date for the purchases under the 2011 plan.



17
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Noncontrolling Interest
In May 2012, the company completed the acquisition of the remaining 28 percent interest in the Solae, LLC joint venture from Bunge Limited for $447. As the purchase of the remaining interest did not result in a change of control, the difference between the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest of $378 and the consideration paid, net of taxes of $78, was recorded as a $9 increase to additional paid-in capital.

Other Comprehensive Income
A summary of the changes in other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is provided as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Affected Line Item in Consolidated Income Statements1
 
September 30, 2013
September 30, 2012
 
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
 
Cumulative translation adjustment
$
177

$
—

$
177

$
189

$
—

$
189

 
Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(15
)
6

(9
)
(6
)
1

(5
)
See (2) below
Clearance of hedge results to earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
1

—

1

(9
)
5

(4
)
Net sales
Commodity contracts
—

—

—

(2
)
—

(2
)
Cost of goods sold
Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(14
)
6

(8
)
(17
)
6

(11
)
 
Pension benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(4
)
—

(4
)
(609
)
185

(424
)
See (2) below
Prior service benefit
62

(22
)
40

—

—

—

See (2) below
Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
2

—

2

3

(1
)
2

See (3) below
Amortization of loss
244

(83
)
161

222

(75
)
147

See (3) below
Curtailment loss
—

—

—

2

(1
)
1

See (3) below
Pension benefit plans, net
304

(105
)
199

(382
)
108

(274
)
 
Other benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss)
95

(34
)
61

(141
)
51

(90
)
See (2) below
Prior service benefit
199

(69
)
130

857

(299
)
558

See (2) below
Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
(48
)
16

(32
)
(44
)
16

(28
)
See (3) below
Amortization of loss
26

(9
)
17

24

(9
)
15

See (3) below
Curtailment loss
—

—

—

3

(1
)
2

See (3) below
Other benefit plans, net
272

(96
)
176

699

(242
)
457

 
Net unrealized loss on securities
—

—

—

(5
)
2

(3
)
 
Other comprehensive income
$
739

$
(195
)
$
544

$
484

$
(126
)
$
358

 










18
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

 
Nine Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
Affected Line Item in Consolidated Income Statements1
 
September 30, 2013
September 30, 2012
 
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
 
Cumulative translation adjustment
$
(46
)
$
—

$
(46
)
$
(53
)
$
—

$
(53
)
 
Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(39
)
15

(24
)
30

(14
)
16

See (2) below
Clearance of hedge results to earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
(2
)
1

(1
)
(20
)
7

(13
)
Net sales
Commodity contracts
(25
)
10

(15
)
(46
)
21

(25
)
Cost of goods sold
Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(66
)
26

(40
)
(36
)
14

(22
)
 
Pension benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss)
52

(14
)
38

(628
)
195

(433
)
See (2) below
Prior service benefit
62

(22
)
40

22

(8
)
14

See (2) below
Reclassifications to net income:
 
 

 
 

 
Amortization of prior service cost
8

(2
)
6

10

(3
)
7

See (3) below
Amortization of loss
724

(247
)
477

661

(227
)
434

See (3) below
Curtailment loss
1

—

1

2

(1
)
1

See (3) below
Settlement loss
152

(45
)
107

—

—

—

See (3) below
Pension benefit plans, net
999

(330
)
669

67

(44
)
23

 
Other benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss)
140

(49
)
91

(141
)
51

(90
)
See (2) below
Prior service benefit
199

(69
)
130

857

(299
)
558

See (2) below
Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
(142
)
50

(92
)
(104
)
36

(68
)
See (3) below
Amortization of loss
51

(18
)
33

68

(24
)
44

See (3) below
Curtailment (gain) loss
(154
)
54

(100
)
3

(1
)
2

See (3) below
Settlement loss
1

—

1

—

—

—

See (3) below
Other benefit plans, net
95

(32
)
63

683

(237
)
446

 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
1

(1
)
—

(3
)
1

(2
)
 
Other comprehensive income
$
983

$
(337
)
$
646

$
658

$
(266
)
$
392

 

1 
Represents the income statement line item within the interim Consolidated Income Statement affected by the pre-tax reclassification out of other comprehensive income (loss).
2 
These amounts represent changes in accumulated other comprehensive income excluding changes due to reclassifying amounts to the interim Consolidated Income Statements.
3 
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost of the company's pension and other long-term employee benefit plans. See Note 12 for additional information.









19
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

The changes and after-tax balances of components comprising accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are summarized below:
 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
Net Revaluation and Clearance of Cash Flow Hedges to Earnings
Pension Benefit Plans
Other Benefit Plans
Unrealized Gain on Securities
Total
2013
 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance January 1, 2013
$
(167
)
$
3

$
(8,686
)
$
202

$
2

$
(8,646
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
(46
)
(24
)
78

221

—

229

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
—

(16
)
591

(158
)
—

417

Balance September 30, 2013
$
(213
)
$
(37
)
$
(8,017
)
$
265

$
2

$
(8,000
)

 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
Net Revaluation and Clearance of Cash Flow Hedges to Earnings
Pension Benefit Plans
Other Benefit Plans
Unrealized Gain on Securities
Total
2012
 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance January 1, 2012
$
(244
)
$
41

$
(8,276
)
$
(274
)
$
3

$
(8,750
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
(53
)
15

(444
)
467

(2
)
(17
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
—

(38
)
442

(22
)
—

382

Balance September 30, 2012
$
(297
)
$
18

$
(8,278
)
$
171

$
1

$
(8,385
)

Note 11. Financial Instruments
Debt
The estimated fair value of the company's total debt including interest rate financial instruments was determined using level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities, the fair value of the company's debt was approximately $15,490 and $13,015 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the issuance in the first quarter 2013 of $1,250 of 2.80% Notes due February 15, 2023 and $750 of 4.15% Notes due February 15, 2043 and an increase in short-term borrowings, partially offset by debt maturities and a decrease in the fair value due to changes in market interest rates during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Cash Equivalents
The fair value of cash equivalents approximates its stated value.  The estimated fair value of the company's cash equivalents was determined using level 1 and level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”  Level 1 measurements are based on quoted market prices and level 2 measurements are based on current interest rates for similar instruments with comparable credit risk and time to maturity.  The company held $1,334 and $0 of money market funds (level 1 measurements) as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The company held $3,697 and $2,026 of other cash equivalents (level 2 measurements) as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.     

Derivative Instruments
Objectives and Strategies for Holding Derivative Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the company enters into contractual arrangements (derivatives) to reduce its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate and commodity price risks. The company has established a variety of derivative programs to be utilized for financial risk management. These programs reflect varying levels of exposure coverage and time horizons based on an assessment of risk.


20
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Derivative programs have procedures and controls and are approved by the Corporate Financial Risk Management Committee, consistent with the company's financial risk management policies and guidelines. Derivative instruments used are forwards, options, futures and swaps. The company has not designated any nonderivatives as hedging instruments.

The company's financial risk management procedures also address counterparty credit approval, limits and routine exposure monitoring and reporting. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions and major commodity exchanges. The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. The company utilizes collateral support annex agreements with certain counterparties to limit its exposure to credit losses. The company's derivative assets and liabilities are reported on a gross basis in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The company anticipates performance by counterparties to these contracts and therefore no material loss is expected. Market and counterparty credit risks associated with these instruments are regularly reported to management.

The notional amounts of the company's derivative instruments were as follows:
 
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
1,000

$
1,000

Foreign currency contracts
683

1,083

Commodity contracts
168

753

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
11,611

6,733

Commodity contracts
15

242


Foreign Currency Risk
The company's objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency rate changes. Accordingly, the company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of its existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and cash flows.

The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. The primary business objective of this hedging program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes, net of related tax effects, are minimized. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the company's exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. The objective of the hedge program is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk
The company uses interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate mix of the total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed for floating rate interest payments to effectively convert fixed rate debt into floating rate debt based on USD LIBOR. Interest rate swaps allow the company to achieve a target range of floating rate debt.

Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risk management programs serve to reduce exposure to price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as copper, corn, soybeans and soybean meal. The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge the commodity price risk associated with energy feedstock and agricultural commodity exposures.

Fair Value Hedges
Interest Rate Swaps
At September 30, 2013, the company maintained a number of interest rate swaps, which were implemented at the time debt instruments were issued. All interest rate swaps qualify for the shortcut method of hedge accounting, thus there is no ineffectiveness related to these hedges.




21
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Cash Flow Hedges
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company uses foreign currency exchange instruments such as forwards and options to offset a portion of the company's exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues.

Commodity Contracts
The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments, including options, futures and swaps, to hedge the commodity price risk associated with energy feedstock and agriculture commodity exposures.

While each risk management program has a different time maturity period, most programs currently do not extend beyond the next two-year period. Cash flow hedge results are reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the related exposure impacts earnings. Reclassifications are made sooner if it appears that a forecasted transaction will not materialize. The following table summarizes the after-tax effect of cash flow hedges on accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Beginning balance
$
(29
)
$
29

$
3

$
41

Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(9
)
(5
)
(24
)
15

Clearance of hedge results to earnings
1

(6
)
(16
)
(38
)
Ending balance
$
(37
)
$
18

$
(37
)
$
18


At September 30, 2013, the after-tax amount expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings over the next 12 months is $(30).

Derivatives not Designated in Hedging Relationships
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to reduce its net exposure, by currency, related to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes are minimized. The netting of such exposures precludes the use of hedge accounting; however, the required revaluation of the forward contracts and the associated foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities intends to achieve a minimal earnings impact, after taxes. Additionally, the company has cross-currency swaps to hedge foreign currency fluctuations on long-term intercompany loans.

In 2012, the company initiated a program to utilize forward exchange contracts to reduce the net exposure related to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its discontinued operations.

Commodity Contracts
The company utilizes options, futures and swaps that are not designated as hedging instruments to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans and soybean meal.


22
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The table below presents the fair values of the company's derivative assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2012 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
 
 
Fair Value Using Level 2 Inputs
 
Balance Sheet Location
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Asset derivatives:
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps1
Other assets
$
35

$
55

Foreign currency contracts
Accounts and notes receivable, net
3

7

 
 
38

62

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 

 
Foreign currency contracts2
Accounts and notes receivable, net
94

88

 
 




Total asset derivatives3
 
$
132

$
150

Cash collateral1,2
Other accrued liabilities
$
31

$
44

 
 
 
 
Liability derivatives:
 
 

 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 

 
Foreign currency contracts
Other accrued liabilities
$
1

$
10

Commodity contracts
Other accrued liabilities
1

—

 
 
2

10

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 

 
Foreign currency contracts
Other accrued liabilities
99

76

Commodity contracts
Other accrued liabilities
1

1

 
 
100

77

Total liability derivatives3
 
$
102

$
87


1 
Cash collateral held as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 represents $16 and $13, respectively, related to interest rate swap derivatives designated as hedging instruments.
2 
Cash collateral held as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 represents $15 and $31, respectively, related to foreign currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
3 
The company's derivative assets and liabilities subject to enforceable master netting arrangements totaled $73 at September 30, 2013 and $40 at December 31, 2012.




23
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Effect of Derivative Instruments
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI1
(Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income2
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Income Statement Classification
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
—

$
—

$
(5
)
$
—

Interest expense3
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
(5
)
(16
)
(1
)
13

Net sales
Commodity contracts
(10
)
10

—

(2
)
Cost of goods sold
 
(15
)
(6
)
(6
)
11

 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
—

—

(130
)
(221
)
Other income (loss), net4
Commodity contracts
—

—

(1
)
(8
)
Cost of goods sold
 
—

—

(131
)
(229
)
 
Total derivatives
$
(15
)
$
(6
)
$
(137
)
$
(218
)
 

 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI1
(Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income2
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Income Statement Classification
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
—

$
—

$
(20
)
$
(4
)
Interest expense3
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
11

1

2

20

Net sales
Commodity contracts
(50
)
28

25

46

Cost of goods sold
 
(39
)
29

7

62

 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
—

—

66

(111
)
Other income (loss), net4
Commodity contracts
—

—

(9
)
(22
)
Cost of goods sold
 
—

—

57

(133
)
 
Total derivatives
$
(39
)
$
29

$
64

$
(71
)
 

1  
OCI is defined as other comprehensive income (loss).
2  
For cash flow hedges, this represents the effective portion of the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income during the period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, there was no material ineffectiveness with regard to the company's cash flow hedges.
3  
Gain (loss) recognized in income of derivative is offset to $0 by gain (loss) recognized in income of the hedged item.
4  
Gain (loss) recognized in other income (loss), net, was partially offset by the related gain (loss) on the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of the company's operations, which were $29 and $91 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $(121) and $(50) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

24
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)


Note 12. Long-Term Employee Benefits 
Pension Plans
In February 2013, DuPont completed the sale of its Performance Coatings business. As a result of the sale, the company recorded settlement and curtailment losses of $153. See Note 2 for additional information.

In connection with the announcement of the planned sale of the Performance Coatings business, the company recorded a pension curtailment loss of $2 and re-measured the principal U.S. pension plan and certain other pension plans as of August 31, 2012. In connection with the re-measurement, the company updated the discount rate and expected return on plan assets, assumed at December 31, 2011, from 4.50 percent to 4.10 percent and from 9.00 percent to 8.75 percent, respectively. The curtailment and re-measurement increased the underfunded status of the pension plans and the pre-tax net loss by $609.

The following sets forth the components of the company’s net periodic benefit cost for pensions:  
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Service cost
$
67

$
67

$
206

$
201

Interest cost
272

290

816

882

Expected return on plan assets
(379
)
(378
)
(1,139
)
(1,138
)
Amortization of loss
244

222

724

661

Amortization of prior service cost
2

3

8

10

Curtailment loss
—

2

1

2

Settlement loss
—

—

152

—

Net periodic benefit cost
$
206

$
206

$
768

$
618


Other Long-Term Employee Benefit Plans
In conjunction with the sale of the Performance Coating business noted above, the company recorded a net $153 settlement and curtailment gain. See Note 2 for additional information.
During the third quarter 2013, the company amended its U.S. parent company retiree life insurance plan for employees retiring on and after January 1, 2015 and subsidiary retiree health care plans. As a result of these changes, the company was required to re-measure the associated plans as of August 31, 2013, which included updating the discount rate assumption to 4.75% from 3.85% assumed at December 31, 2012. The re-measurement and amendment resulted in a net decrease of $294 to the company's other long-term employee benefit obligation, which included an actuarial gain of $95 due to a higher discount rate and prior service benefit of $199.

During the third quarter 2012, the company amended its U.S. parent company retiree medical and dental plans for Medicare-eligible retirees and survivors. As a result of this change, the company was required to re-measure the associated plans as of July 31, 2012, which included updating the discount rate assumption to 4.00 percent from 4.50 percent assumed at December 31, 2011. The re-measurement and amendment resulted in a net decrease of $700 to the company's other long-term employee benefit obligation, which included an actuarial loss of $138 due to a lower discount rate and a credit of $838 to the prior service cost due to the plan amendment. The company's other long-term employee benefit expense was reduced by approximately $18 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.


25
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

The following sets forth the components of the company’s net periodic benefit cost for other long-term employee benefits:  
 
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Service cost
$
7

$
9

$
23

$
28

Interest cost
32

41

98

137

Amortization of loss
26

24

51

68

Amortization of prior service benefit
(48
)
(44
)
(142
)
(104
)
Curtailment loss (gain)
—

3

(154
)
3

Settlement loss
—

—

1

—

Net periodic benefit cost
$
17

$
33

$
(123
)
$
132



26
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 13.  Segment Information 
Effective January 1, 2013, to better indicate operating performance, the company eliminated the allocation of non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs from segment pre-tax operating income (loss) (PTOI). Segment PTOI is defined as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes excluding non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs, exchange gains (losses), corporate expenses and interest. Certain reclassifications of prior year data have been made to conform to current year classifications.

Three Months
Ended September 30,
Agriculture1
Electronics &
Communications
Industrial Biosciences
Nutrition & Health
Performance
Chemicals
Performance
Materials
Safety &
Protection
Pharm-aceuticals
Other
Total
2013
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
1,633

 
$
638

 
$
305

 
$
868

 
$
1,720

 
$
1,663

 
$
985

 
$
—

 
$
1

 
$
7,813

Less: Transfers
3

 
3

 
3

 
—

 
46

 
22

 
1

 
—

 
—

 
78

Net sales
1,630

 
635

 
302

 
868

 
1,674

 
1,641

 
984

 
—

 
1

 
7,735

PTOI
(102
)
2 

97

 
45

 
81

 
182

3 

374

 
171

 
5

 
(112
)
 
741

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
1,423

 
$
607

 
$
292

 
$
876

 
$
1,732

 
$
1,614

 
$
934

 
$
—

 
$
2

 
$
7,480

Less: Transfers
—

 
4

 
3

 
—

 
56

 
24

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
90

Net sales
1,423

 
603

 
289

 
876

 
1,676

 
1,590

 
931

 
—

 
2

 
7,390

PTOI
(198
)
2,6 

(99
)
6,7 
37

6 

64

6 

410

6 

230

6,7 
92

6 

10

 
(85
)
 
461


Nine Months
Ended September 30,
Agriculture1
Electronics &
Communications
Industrial Biosciences
Nutrition & Health
Performance
Chemicals
Performance
Materials
Safety &
Protection
Pharm-aceuticals
Other
Total
2013
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
9,933

 
$
1,907

 
$
898

 
$
2,601

 
$
5,087

 
$
4,892

 
$
2,909

 
$
—

 
$
5

 
$
28,232

Less: Transfers
10

 
12

 
10

 
—

 
153

 
57

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
245

Net sales
9,923

 
1,895

 
888

 
2,601

 
4,934

 
4,835

 
2,906

 
—

 
5

 
27,987

PTOI
2,240

2 

241

 
129

 
218

 
697

3 

1,002

 
481

 
27

 
(276
)
 
4,759

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
8,891

 
$
2,079

 
$
880

 
$
2,569

 
$
5,600

 
$
4,913

 
$
2,861

 
$
—

 
$
4

 
$
27,797

Less: Transfers
4

 
13

 
8

 
—

 
202

 
74

 
9

 
—

 
—

 
310

Net sales
8,887

 
2,066

 
872

 
2,569

 
5,398

 
4,839

 
2,852

 
—

 
4

 
27,487

PTOI
1,772

2,6 

181

4,6,7 
118

6 

248

6 

1,575

6 

851

6,7 
432

6 

53

 
(385
)
5 

4,845


1 
As of September 30, 2013, Agriculture net assets were $9,692, an increase of $4,936 from $4,756 at December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher trade receivables due to normal seasonality in the sales and cash collections cycle.
2 
Included charges of $(65) and $(180), offset by $25 of insurance recoveries, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and charges of $(125) and $(440) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, recorded in other operating charges associated with the company's process to fairly resolve claims associated with the use of Imprelis®. See Note 9 for additional information.
3 
Included a $(72) charge related to the titanium dioxide antitrust litigation. See Note 9 for additional information.
4 
Included a $122 gain recorded in other income, net related to the sale of the company's interest in an equity method investment.
5 
Included a $(137) charge recorded in other operating charges related to the company's settlement of litigation with INVISTA.
6 
Included a $(93) restructuring charge impacting the following segments: Agriculture - $(3), Electronics & Communications - $(7), Industrial Biosciences - $(3), Nutrition & Health - $(13), Performance Chemicals - $(3), Performance Materials - $(9), and Safety & Protection - $(55).
7 
Included a $(242) impairment charge recorded in employee separation/asset related charges, net related to asset groupings, which impacted the segments as follows: Electronics & Communications - $(150) and Performance Materials - $(92). See Note 3 for additional information.

27
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Reconciliation to Consolidated Income Statements 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2013
2012
2013
2012
Total segment PTOI
$
741

$
461

$
4,759

$
4,845

Non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs
(142
)
(157
)
(415
)
(507
)
Net exchange losses, including affiliates
(101
)
(130
)
(55
)
(161
)
Corporate expenses
(162
)
(233
)
(582
)
(708
)
Interest expense
(108
)
(116
)
(340
)
(347
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
$
228

$
(175
)
$
3,367

$
3,122


28
Table of Contents

Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statements About Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates” or other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the company's strategy for growth, product development, regulatory approval, market position, anticipated benefits of recent acquisitions, outcome of contingencies, such as litigation and environmental matters, expenditures and financial results, are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events which may not be accurate or realized. Forward-looking statements also involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company's control. Some of the important factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in any such forward-looking statements are:

•
Fluctuations in energy and raw material prices;
•
Failure to develop and market new products and optimally manage product life cycles;
•
Outcome of significant litigation and environmental matters, including those related to divested businesses;
•
Failure to appropriately manage process safety and product stewardship issues;
•
Effect of changes in tax, environmental and other laws and regulations or political conditions in the United States of America (U.S.) and other countries in which the company operates;
•
Conditions in the global economy and global capital markets, including economic factors, such as inflation, deflation and fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices, as well as regulatory requirements;
•
Impact of business disruptions, including supply disruptions, and security threats, regardless of cause, including acts of sabotage, cyber-attacks, terrorism or war, weather events and natural disasters;
•
Ability to protect and enforce the company's intellectual property rights; and
•
Successful integration of acquired businesses and separation of underperforming or non-strategic assets or businesses.

For additional information on these and other risks and factors that could affect our forward-looking statements, see Part II, Item 1A of this report and the company's Risk Factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A of the company's 2012 Annual Report.

Recent Developments 
Exploring Strategic Alternatives for the Performance Chemicals Segment
On July 23, 2013, DuPont announced that it is exploring strategic alternatives for its Performance Chemicals segment that may include a full or partial separation of each of these businesses from the company through a spin-off, sale or other transaction. The segment includes the DuPont Titanium Technologies and DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts businesses. The company may pursue a different strategic alternative for each business.

Acquisition of Pannar Seed Pty. Ltd
On July 31, 2013, the company acquired a controlling interest in Pannar Seed Pty. Ltd (Pannar). The results of the acquisition are included with the Agriculture segment. See Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

29
Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Overview
The following is a summary of the results of continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013:

•
Net sales were $7.7 billion, 5 percent above prior year, with 9 percent higher volume offsetting 3 percent lower local prices and 1 percent negative currency impact.

•
Agriculture sales grew 15 percent driven by increased insecticide volumes and higher seed prices in Latin America. The sales growth, lower Imprelis® herbicide claims, and the benefit of increased ownership in Pannar reduced the segment's third quarter PTOI seasonal loss to $102 million.

•
Total segment PTOI increased to $0.7 billion from $0.5 billion in the prior year, reflecting improvements in all operating segments excluding Performance Chemicals. The increase was driven by higher volumes, the absence of prior-year charges for employee separation costs and asset impairments, and lower charges related to Imprelis® herbicide claims, partly offset by a $228 million decline in Performance Chemicals PTOI. The decline in Performance Chemicals principally reflects significantly lower global titanium dioxide prices versus prior year.

The following is a summary of the results of continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

•
Net sales of $28.0 billion were up 2 percent with volume up 4 percent principally reflecting increases for Agriculture and a rebound from prior-year lower levels for Performance Chemicals.

•
Agriculture PTOI increased 26 percent to $2.2 billion, driven by volume growth in North America and Latin America, higher pricing from new seed and crop protection products, and lower Imprelis® herbicide claims.

•
Total segment PTOI of $4.8 billion was 2 percent lower reflecting a $0.9 billion decrease in Performance Chemicals PTOI offset by improved results for Electronics & Communications and Performance Materials, in part due to the absence of prior-year restructuring and asset impairment charges.

•
Income from continuing operations after income taxes was $2.7 billion, up 9 percent versus $2.5 billion for the same period last year.

•
Proceeds from the sale of the Performance Coatings segment funded a $1 billion share buyback.

•
Cost productivity gains and restructuring savings are on track to meet full-year targets.

Net Sales
Net sales for the third quarter were $7.7 billion versus $7.4 billion in the prior year, an increase of 5 percent. Sales reflect 9 percent higher volume partly offset by 3 percent lower local prices and 1 percent negative currency impact. Higher volume was primarily driven by increases in Performance Chemicals, Performance Materials and Agriculture. Local prices principally reflect lower Performance Chemicals prices. Currency effect primarily results from a stronger dollar versus the Yen, Indian rupee, and the Brazilian real, partly offset by a weaker dollar versus the Euro. Sales in developing markets increased $0.3 billion, or 11 percent, to $3.1 billion, reflecting increases in developing Asia, Latin America, and developing EMEA, which reflects the acquisition of a controlling interest in Pannar in Africa. The percentage of total company sales in developing markets increased to 40 percent from 38 percent in the prior year. Developing markets include China, India and countries located in Latin America, Eastern and Central Europe, Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia.


30
Table of Contents

The table below shows a regional breakdown of net sales based on location of customers and percentage variances from the prior year: 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Percent Change Due to:
 
Net Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2012
Local
Price
Currency
Effect
Volume
Portfolio/Other
Worldwide
$
7.7

5

(3
)
(1
)
9

—

U.S. & Canada
2.5

3

(1
)
—

5

(1
)
Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA)
1.8

10

(5
)
2

10

3

Asia Pacific
2.0

3

(6
)
(3
)
12

—

Latin America
1.4

4

—

(4
)
8

—


Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $28.0 billion versus $27.5 billion in the prior year, an increase of 2 percent. Sales reflect 4 percent higher volume partly offset by 1 percent lower local prices and 1 percent negative currency impact. Higher volume was driven by increases in Agriculture, Performance Chemicals and Performance Materials. Local prices principally reflect lower Performance Chemicals prices. Currency effect primarily results from a stronger dollar versus the Yen, Indian rupee, and the Brazilian real. Sales in developing markets increased $0.5 billion, or 6 percent, to $8.9 billion, principally reflecting increases in developing EMEA and Latin America. The percentage of total company sales in developing markets increased to 32 percent from 31 percent in the prior year.

 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Percent Change Due to:
 
Net Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2012
Local
Price
Currency
Effect
Volume
Worldwide
$
28.0

2

(1
)
(1
)
4

U.S. & Canada
12.1

4

2

—

2

Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA)
6.6

2

(2
)
—

4

Asia Pacific
5.8

(4
)
(6
)
(2
)
4

Latin America
3.5

5

—

(3
)
8


Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net, totaled $70 million for the third quarter 2013, an increase of $124 million compared to $(54) million in the prior year. The increase was due primarily to a $26 million re-measurement gain on equity investment, a $30 million benefit from a joint venture, lower pre-tax net exchange losses of $29 million, a $14 million increase in royalty income, and other miscellaneous income.

Year-to-date, other income, net was $321 million compared to $251 million last year, an increase of $70 million. The increase was due primarily to lower pre-tax net exchange losses of $106 million, a $26 million re-measurement gain on equity investment, a $38 million increase in royalty income, a $30 million benefit from a joint venture and other miscellaneous income, offset by the absence of a $122 million gain recorded in the second quarter 2012 related to the sale of the company's interest in an equity method investment.

Additional information related to the company's other income, net, is included in Note 4 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
COGS totaled $5.2 billion in the third quarter 2013 versus $4.8 billion in the prior year, an 8 percent increase. COGS as a percent of net sales increased 2 percentage points to 67 percent, driven by increased raw material costs, primarily for agricultural inputs and titanium ore.

COGS for the year-to-date was $17.4 billion, an increase of 5 percent versus $16.6 billion in the prior year. COGS as a percent of net sales increased 2 percentage points to 62 percent, driven by increased raw material costs, primarily for agricultural inputs and titanium ore.

31
Table of Contents


Other Operating Charges
Other operating charges totaled $1.0 billion in the third quarter 2013 versus $0.9 billion in the prior year, a 6 percent increase, primarily due to increased manufacturing support and environmental costs.

Other operating charges for the year-to-date were $2.8 billion, a decrease of 7 percent versus $3.1 billion in the prior year, principally due to lower Imprelis® herbicide claims and other litigation charges. See Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to these matters.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)
SG&A totaled $774 million for the third quarter 2013 versus $764 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increased global commissions and selling and marketing investments in the Agriculture segment. SG&A was approximately 10 percent of net sales for the third quarter 2013 and 2012.

Year-to-date SG&A totaled $2.7 billion in 2013 and 2012, a slight increase year over year, primarily reflecting increased global commissions and selling and marketing investments in the Agriculture segment. SG&A was approximately 10 percent of net sales for the year-to-date 2013 and 2012.

Research and Development Expense (R&D)
R&D totaled $540 million and $521 million for the third quarter 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase was primarily due to continued growth investments in the Agriculture segment and increases in pre-commercial investment. R&D was approximately 7 percent of net sales for the third quarter 2013 and 2012.

Year-to-date R&D totaled $1.6 billion in 2013 and 2012, a slight increase year over year, reflecting continued growth investment in the Agriculture segment. R&D was approximately 6 percent of net sales for the year-to-date 2013 and 2012.

Interest Expense
Interest expense totaled $108 million in the third quarter 2013, compared to $116 million in 2012. The decrease was due to lower average debt and lower borrowing rates. For the year-to-date, interest expense was $340 million versus $347 million in 2012. The year-to-date decrease was due to lower average debt offset by a higher average borrowing rate.

(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes on Continuing Operations
The company's effective tax rate for the third quarter 2013 was a 15.4 percent benefit on pre-tax income from continuing operations as compared to a 77.1 percent benefit on a pre-tax loss from continuing operations in 2012. The change in effective tax rate principally relates to benefits associated with certain U.S. business tax provisions in 2013, the tax impact of certain restructuring and asset impairment charges in the third quarter 2012, as well as geographic mix of earnings.

The company's effective tax rate for the year-to-date was 20.4 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations as compared to 21.0 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations in 2012. The lower effective tax rate principally relates to benefits associated with certain U.S. business tax provisions in 2013 and geographic mix of earnings.

See Note 5 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations after Income Taxes
Income from continuing operations after income taxes for third quarter 2013 was $263 million, versus a loss from continuing operations after income taxes of $40 million in the same period last year. Year-to-date 2013 income from continuing operations after income taxes was $2.7 billion, an increase of 9 percent, compared to $2.5 billion in the same period last year. The increases in both periods are primarily due to the absence of employee separation/asset related charges, net of $394 million in the prior year as well as the reasons noted above.

 

32
Table of Contents

Segment Reviews
Summarized below are comments on individual segment sales and pre-tax operating income (loss) (PTOI) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same periods in 2012. Effective January 1, 2013, to better indicate operating performance, the company eliminated the allocation of non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs from segment pre-tax operating income (loss) (PTOI). Segment PTOI is defined as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes excluding non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs, exchange gains (losses), corporate expenses and interest. Certain reclassifications of prior year data have been made to conform to current year classifications. All references to prices are on a U.S. dollar (USD) basis, including the impact of currency. A reconciliation of segment sales to consolidated net sales and segment PTOI to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is included in Note 13 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes third quarter and year-to-date 2013 segment sales and related variances versus prior year:
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2013
Percentage Change Due to:
 
Segment
Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2012
Price
Volume
Portfolio
and Other
Agriculture
$
1.6

15

1

10

4

Electronics & Communications
0.6

5

(9
)
14

—

Industrial Biosciences
0.3

4

—

4

—

Nutrition & Health
0.9

(1
)
1

(1
)
(1
)
Performance Chemicals
1.7

(1
)
(13
)
12

—

Performance Materials
1.7

3

(2
)
6

(1
)
Safety & Protection
1.0

5

—

5

—


 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2013
Percentage Change Due to:
 
Segment
Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2012
Price
Volume
Portfolio
and Other
Agriculture
$
9.9

12

6

6

—

Electronics & Communications
1.9

(8
)
(6
)
(2
)
—

Industrial Biosciences
0.9

2

2

—

—

Nutrition & Health
2.6

1

3

—

(2
)
Performance Chemicals
5.1

(9
)
(13
)
4

—

Performance Materials
4.9

—

(3
)
4

(1
)
Safety & Protection
2.9

2

(1
)
3

—


Agriculture - PTOI seasonal loss of $102 million in third quarter 2013 compared to a seasonal loss of $198 million in the same quarter of last year. The improvement was driven by strong insecticide demand as growers anticipate heavy insect pressure in Latin America, price improvement in seeds, a $26 million gain resulting from the acquisition of a controlling interest in Pannar, and lower charges incurred related to Imprelis® herbicide claims. These benefits were partially offset by higher seed costs reflecting finalization of the northern hemisphere season, continued investment to drive future growth, and a negative currency impact. Third quarter 2013 PTOI included a net charge of $40 million ($65 million charge offset by $25 million of insurance recoveries) related to Imprelis® herbicide claims compared to a charge of $125 million in third quarter 2012.

Year-to-date PTOI of $2.2 billion increased over $0.4 billion, despite higher seed input costs, on sales growth and lower charges incurred related to Imprelis® herbicide claims. Agriculture sales increased 12 percent driven by seed price gains and volume growth, reflecting strong corn sales in North America and insecticide and fungicide volumes in North America and Latin America. Year-to-date 2013 PTOI included net charges of $155 million ($180 million in charges offset by $25 million of insurance recoveries) related to Imprelis® herbicide claims compared to charges of $440 million in year-to-date 2012.


33
Table of Contents

Electronics & Communications - PTOI of $97 million in third quarter 2013 compared to a loss of $99 million in the same quarter of 2012. The increase was due primarily to the absence of a $150 million asset impairment charge recorded in third quarter 2012, as well as higher sales volume, mainly in photovoltaic markets reflecting demand improvement and share gains. Higher volume was offset in part by reduced selling prices, primarily from pass-through of lower metals prices.

Year-to-date PTOI of $241 million increased $60 million due primarily to the absence of a $150 million asset impairment charge recorded in third quarter 2012 and $20 million of income from an OLED technology licensing agreement realized during second quarter 2013, partially offset by the absence of a $122 million gain recorded in 2012 related to the sale of the company's interest in an equity method investment. Sales were down as share gains and improving demand were more than offset by lower usage of materials per photovoltaic module and reduced selling prices, mainly from pass-through of lower metals prices.

Industrial Biosciences - PTOI of $45 million was up $8 million on higher sales of Sorona® polymer for carpeting and apparel and lower costs, partially offset by higher raw material costs.

Year-to-date PTOI of $129 million was up $11 million on pricing gains for Sorona® polymer for carpeting partially offset by lower enzyme demand for U.S. ethanol production.

Nutrition & Health - PTOI of $81 million increased $17 million reflecting productivity improvements, partially offset by higher cost guar inventory and negative currency impact. Third quarter 2012 PTOI included a $13 million restructuring charge related to the 2012 restructuring program.

Year-to-date PTOI of $218 million decreased $30 million due largely to higher cost guar inventory, partially offset by pricing gains.

Performance Chemicals - PTOI of $182 million was $228 million lower as price declines for titanium dioxide, refrigerants, and fluoropolymers, along with higher raw material inventory costs, principally ore costs, more than offset volume increases. Titanium dioxide volume was up 25 percent from third quarter 2012 and essentially flat on a sequential basis. Third quarter 2013 PTOI includes a $72 million charge related to the titanium dioxide antitrust litigation. See Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial statements for additional information related to this litigation matter.

Year-to-date PTOI of $697 million was $878 million lower, due largely to price declines in the titanium dioxide market more than offsetting volume increases.

Performance Materials - PTOI of $374 million, which includes a $30 million benefit from a joint venture, increased $144 million due largely to the absence of a $92 million asset impairment charge recorded in third quarter 2012. PTOI improvement from higher volume reflecting increased demand in packaging, automotive, and electronics markets was partially offset by lower selling prices.

Year-to-date PTOI of $1,002 million increased $151 million due largely to the absence of a $92 million asset impairment charge recorded in the prior year. Lower feedstock costs and higher volumes in packaging markets, partially offset by lower selling prices also contributed to higher PTOI.

Safety & Protection - PTOI of $171 million increased $79 million due primarily to higher volume, productivity improvements, and the absence of a $55 million restructuring charge recorded in third quarter 2012 related to the 2012 restructuring program, partially offset by weaker sales mix. Higher volume reflects increased demand for U.S. ballistics military protection, protective garments, and construction products that offset softness in global public sector spending.

Year-to-date PTOI of $481 million increased $49 million due primarily to the absence of a $55 million restructuring charge in the prior year related to the 2012 restructuring program. Higher volume in industrial and automotive markets more than offset weaker sales mix and lower plant utilization.

Pharmaceuticals - Third quarter PTOI was $5 million compared to $10 million in the same period last year. Year-to-date PTOI of $27 million, including certain one-time benefits, compared to $53 million in the prior year. Decreased PTOI reflects the expiration of the patents for Cozaar®/Hyzaar®.


34
Table of Contents

Liquidity & Capital Resources
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
$
7,189

$
4,407

Total debt
14,959

11,740


Total debt at September 30, 2013 was $15.0 billion, an increase of $3.3 billion from $11.7 billion at December 31, 2012.  The increase was primarily due to the issuance in the first quarter 2013 of $1,250 million of 2.80% Notes due February 15, 2023 and $750 million of 4.15% Notes due February 15, 2043 and an increase in short-term borrowings, partially offset by debt maturities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The company believes its ability to generate cash from operations and access to capital markets will be adequate to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund working capital, capital spending, dividend payments, debt maturities and other cash needs. The company's liquidity needs can be met through a variety of sources, including: cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, commercial paper, syndicated credit lines, bilateral credit lines, equity and long-term debt markets, and asset sales. The company's current strong financial position, liquidity and credit ratings provide excellent access to the capital markets. In addition, spending and capital productivity actions have been implemented. The company will continue to monitor the financial markets in order to respond to changing conditions. Depending on these conditions, the proceeds of commercial paper may be invested in cash equivalents or marketable securities.

Pursuant to its cash discipline policy, the company seeks first to maintain a strong balance sheet and second, to return excess cash to shareholders unless the opportunity to invest for growth is compelling. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities provide primary liquidity to support all short-term debt obligations. A substantial majority of the company's cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is held by foreign subsidiaries. The company believes that it has sufficient sources of domestic liquidity to support its assumption that undistributed earnings at September 30, 2013 can be considered reinvested indefinitely. The company has access to approximately $4.4 billion in unused credit lines with several major financial institutions as additional support to meet short-term liquidity needs and general corporate purposes, including letters of credit.

The company continually reviews its debt portfolio and occasionally may rebalance it to ensure adequate liquidity and an optimum debt maturity schedule.

The company's credit ratings impact its access to the debt capital market and cost of capital. The company remains committed to a strong financial position and strong investment-grade rating. The company's long-term and short-term credit ratings are as follows:
 
Long-term
Short-term
Outlook
Standard & Poor's
A
A-1
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service
A2
P-1
Stable
Fitch Ratings
A
F1
Stable


35
Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flows 
Cash used for operating activities was $2.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used for operating activities of $0.4 billion during the same period last year. The $1.9 billion change was primarily due to lower cash from earnings and higher working capital within the Agriculture segment.
 
The change in other operating charges and credits, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $0.4 billion, a decrease of $0.5 billion from the same period last year. The decrease is primarily due to the absence of asset impairment charges in the third quarter 2013. Other operating charges and credits - net primarily consists of expenses related to pension plans as well as reclassifications of items whose cash effects are investing or financing activities.

Cash provided by investing activities was $3.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash used for investing activities of $0.7 billion for the same period last year. The $4.3 billion change was primarily due to the proceeds received from the sale of the Performance Coatings business. See Note 2 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Purchases of property, plant and equipment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $1.2 billion, a slight increase from the same period last year.

Cash provided by financing activities was $1.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $1.0 billion for the same period last year. The $0.5 billion increase was due primarily to higher borrowings, lower payments for noncontrolling interests partially offset by higher purchases of common stock.
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
(Dollars in millions) 
2013
2012
Cash used for operating activities
$
(2,333
)
$
(426
)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(1,223
)
(1,139
)
Free cash flow
$
(3,556
)
$
(1,565
)
 
Free cash flow is a measurement not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. All companies do not calculate non-GAAP financial measures in the same manner and, accordingly, the company's free cash flow definition may not be consistent with the methodologies used by other companies. The company defines free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment, and therefore indicates operating cash flow available for payment of dividends, other investing activities and other financing activities. Free cash flow is useful to investors and management to evaluate the company's cash flow and financial performance, and is an integral financial measure used in the company's financial planning process.

Dividends paid to shareholders during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $1.2 billion. In July 2013, the Board of Directors declared a third quarter common stock dividend of $0.45 per share. This dividend is the same as what was paid in the second quarter 2013. With the third quarter dividend, the company has paid quarterly consecutive dividends since the company’s first dividend in the fourth quarter 1904.

In December 2012, the company's Board of Directors authorized a $1 billion share buyback plan. In February 2013, the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with a financial institution under which the company used $1 billion of the proceeds from the sale of Performance Coatings for the purchase of shares of common stock. The 2012 $1 billion share buyback plan was completed in the second quarter 2013 through the ASR agreement, under which the company purchased and retired 20.4 million shares. See Note 10 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In February 2012, the company paid $400 million for the purchase of shares of common stock. The shares were received and retired in May 2012. See Note 10 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
For detailed information related to Guarantees, Indemnifications, and Obligations for Equity Affiliates and Others, see page 33 of the company's 2012 Annual Report, and Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.





36
Table of Contents

Long-term Employee Benefits
The company expects that its pension obligations at year-end 2013 will decrease by about $2-3 billion versus year-end 2012 due to the effect of anticipated rising interest rates on underlying assumptions about the discount rate. However, uncertainties in market circumstances may cause actual discount rates to differ.

Contractual Obligations 
Information related to the company's contractual obligations at December 31, 2012 can be found on page 33 of the company's 2012 Annual Report. The company's contractual obligations at September 30, 2013 have increased approximately $3.4 billion versus prior year-end. The increase is primarily due to the issuance of $2.0 billion in debt during the first quarter 2013 as well as the technology license agreement discussed below.

On March 25, 2013, DuPont, through its subsidiary, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (“Pioneer”), entered into technology license agreements with Monsanto Company. As part of those agreements, DuPont received a non-exclusive, royalty bearing license in the United States and Canada for Monsanto's Genuity ® Roundup Ready 2 Yield ® glyphosate tolerance trait and for Monsanto's dicamba tolerance trait. These herbicide tolerance traits are incorporated into soybean seeds. In addition, DuPont receives post-patent regulatory data access and maintenance support for the Roundup Ready ® 1 glyphosate tolerance trait for soybeans, the Genuity ® Roundup Ready 2 glyphosate tolerance trait for corn, and the YieldGard ® corn borer insect resistance trait for corn. These traits are already incorporated into several of DuPont Pioneer's corn and soybean varieties. DuPont also grants Monsanto licenses to certain DuPont Pioneer disease resistance technology and corn defoliation patents.

Under these agreements, DuPont will make a series of up-front and variable based royalty payments subject to future delivery of enabling soybean genetic material. Total annual fixed royalty payments of $802 million contemplated under the arrangement for trait technology, associated data and soybean lines to support commercial introduction are expected to come due in years 2014-2017. Additionally, beginning in 2018, DuPont will pay royalties on a per unit basis related to the Genuity ® Roundup Ready 2 Yield ® and dicamba tolerance traits for the life of the license, subject to annual minimum payments through 2023 totaling $950 million.

The company's total contractual obligations for license agreements as of September 30, 2013 are as follows:

 
 
Payments Due In
(Dollars in millions)
Total at September 30, 2013
Remainder 2013
2014 - 2015
2016 - 2017
2018 and beyond
License agreements
$
2,171

$
21

$
605

$
595

$
950


PFOA
Further to the discussion under “PFOA” on page 37 of the company's 2012 Annual Report and Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements:

DuPont has made considerable progress on its commitment to no longer make, use or buy PFOA by 2015, or sooner if possible. As of the second quarter 2013, DuPont had already ceased the manufacture of PFOA and discontinued the use of PFOA for production of fluoropolymer resins. In addition, the company continues to make progress toward eliminating the use of PFOA in the manufacture of certain raw materials for perfluoroelastomer parts and some fluoroelastomers.

Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

See Note 11, “Financial Instruments”, to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements. See also Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, on page 38 of the company's 2012 Annual Report for information on the company's utilization of financial instruments and an analysis of the sensitivity of these instruments.


37
Table of Contents

Item 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

a)        Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
The company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures to give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the company's reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These controls and procedures also give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of September 30, 2013, the company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), together with management, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
b)                         Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There has been no change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.

38
Table of Contents

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 
The company is subject to various litigation matters, including, but not limited to, product liability, patent infringement, antitrust claims, and claims for third party property damage or personal injury stemming from alleged environmental torts. Information regarding certain of these matters is set forth below and in Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Litigation
Imprelis® Herbicide Claims Process
Information related to this matter is included in Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading Imprelis®.

PFOA: Environmental and Litigation Proceedings
For purposes of this report, the term PFOA means collectively perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts, including the ammonium salt and does not distinguish between the two forms. Information related to this matter is included in Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading PFOA.

Monsanto Patent Dispute
Information related to this matter is included in Note 9 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading Monsanto Patent Dispute.

Environmental Proceedings
Belle Plant, West Virginia
In August 2013, the U.S. government initiated an enforcement action alleging that the facility violated certain regulatory provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). The alleged non-compliance relates to chemical releases between 2006 and 2010, including one release which involved the death of a DuPont employee after exposure to phosgene.  DuPont is in settlement negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Chambers Works Plant, Deepwater, New Jersey
In 2010, the government initiated an enforcement action alleging that the facility violated recordkeeping requirements of certain provisions of the CAA and the Federal Clean Air Act Regulations (FCAR) governing Leak Detection and Reporting (LDAR) and that it failed to report emissions of a compound from Chambers Works' waste water treatment facility under EPCRA. The alleged non-compliance was identified by EPA in 2007 and 2009 following separate environmental audits. DuPont is in settlement negotiations with EPA and DOJ.

LaPorte Plant, LaPorte, Texas
EPA conducted a multimedia inspection at the LaPorte facility in January 2008. DuPont, EPA and DOJ began discussions in the fall 2011 relating primarily to the management of certain materials in the facility's waste water treatment system. These negotiations continue.

Sabine Plant, Orange, Texas
In June 2012, DuPont began discussions with DOJ and EPA related to a multimedia inspection that EPA conducted at the Sabine facility in March 2009. The discussions primarily involve the management of materials in the facility's waste water treatment system, hazardous waste management and air emissions.

Yerkes Plant, Buffalo, New York
The government alleges that the facility violated recordkeeping requirements of certain provisions of the CAA and the FCAR governing LDAR and that it failed to accurately report emissions under EPCRA. The alleged non-compliance was identified by EPA in 2006 and 2010 following separate environmental audits. DuPont is in settlement negotiations with EPA and DOJ.

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
In July 2012, DuPont received a “notice of noncompliance and show cause” letter from EPA Region III for alleged violations of FIFRA related to product labeling and adverse effects reporting for Imprelis®. DuPont and EPA are in discussions.

Washington Works Plant, West Virginia
In 2011, the U.S. government initiated an enforcement action alleging that the Washington Works plant violated certain regulatory provisions of the CAA governing LDAR. The alleged non-compliance was identified between 2007 and 2010, following an

39
Table of Contents

environmental audit conducted in 2007 and the submission of responses to an information request received in 2009. DuPont is in settlement negotiations with the EPA and DOJ.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS 

Further to the company's risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the company's 2012 Annual Report:

The company's results of operations and financial condition could be seriously impacted by business disruptions and security breaches, including cybersecurity incidents.
Business and/or supply chain disruptions, plant and/or power outages and information technology system and/or network disruptions, regardless of cause including acts of sabotage, employee error or other actions, geo-political activity, weather events and natural disasters could seriously harm the company's operations as well as the operations of its customers and suppliers. Failure to effectively prevent, detect and recover from security breaches, including attacks on information technology and infrastructure by hackers; viruses; breaches due to employee error or actions; or other disruptions could result in misuse of the company's assets, business disruptions, loss of property including trade secrets and confidential business information, legal claims or proceedings, reporting errors, processing inefficiencies, negative media attention, loss of sales and interference with regulatory compliance. Like most major corporations, DuPont is the target of industrial espionage, including cyber-attacks, from time to time. DuPont has determined that these attacks have resulted, and could result in the future, in unauthorized parties gaining access to at least certain confidential business information. However, to date, the company has not experienced any financial impact, changes in the competitive environment or business operations that it attributes to these attacks. Although management does not believe that the company has experienced any material losses to date related to security breaches, including cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that it will not suffer such losses in the future. The company actively manages the risks within its control that could lead to business disruptions and security breaches. As these threats continue to evolve, particularly around cybersecurity, the company may be required to expend significant resources to enhance its control environment, processes, practices and other protective measures. Despite these efforts, such events could materially adversely affect the company's business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Information regarding mine safety and other regulatory actions at the company's surface mine in Starke, Florida is included in Exhibit 95 to this report.

Item 6.
EXHIBITS

Exhibits: The list of exhibits in the Exhibit Index to this report is incorporated herein by reference.


40
Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
Date:
October 22, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
 
 
 
 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
 
Executive Vice President and
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(As Duly Authorized Officer and
 
 
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


41
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).
 
 
 
3.2
 
Company’s Bylaws, as last amended effective August 12, 2013.
 
 
 
4
 
The company agrees to provide the Commission, on request, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the company and its subsidiaries.
 
 
 
10.1*
 
The DuPont Stock Accumulation and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as last amended effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
 
 
 
10.2*
 
Company’s Supplemental Retirement Income Plan, as last amended effective June 4, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
 
 
 
10.3*
 
Company’s Pension Restoration Plan, as restated effective July 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011).
 
 
 
10.4*
 
Company’s Rules for Lump Sum Payments, as last amended effective December 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011).
 
 
 
10.5*
 
Company’s Stock Performance Plan, as last amended effective January 25, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
 
 
 
10.6*
 
Company’s Equity and Incentive Plan as amended August 1, 2013.
 
 
 
10.7*
 
Form of Award Terms under the company’s Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013).
 
 
 
10.8*
 
Company’s Retirement Savings Restoration Plan, as last amended effective January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).
 
 
 
10.9*
 
Company’s Retirement Income Plan for Directors, as last amended January 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012).
 
 
 
10.10*
 
Company’s Management Deferred Compensation Plan, adopted on May 2, 2008, as last amended May 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010).


42
Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
10.11*
 
Company's Senior Executive Severance Plan, adopted on August 12, 2013. The company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules to the Commission upon request.
 
 
 
10.12*
 
Supplemental Deferral Terms for Deferred Long Term Incentive Awards and Deferred Variable Compensation Awards (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
 
 
 
10.13
 
Purchase Agreement dated as of August 30, 2012, by and between E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and Flash Bermuda Co. Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2012) (the "Purchase Agreement"). The company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules to the Commission upon request.
 
 
 
10.14
 
Amendment to purchase Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2013, by and between E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and Flash Bermuda Co. Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).
 
 
 
12
 
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
 
 
 
18.1
 
Preferability Letter of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013).
 
 
 
31.1
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Principal Executive Officer.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Principal Financial Officer.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Principal Executive Officer. The information contained in this Exhibit shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission nor incorporated by reference in any registration statement filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 
 
32.2
 
Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Principal Financial Officer. The information contained in this Exhibit shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission nor incorporated by reference in any registration statement filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 
 
95
 
Mine Safety Disclosures.
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
______________________________________
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-Q.

43