Edgar Filing: ATWOOD OCEANICS INC

f10qjune302009.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

----------------

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13167

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TEXAS			74-1611874
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

15835 Park Ten Place Drive			77084
Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)
		281-749-7800
	(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filings requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes___ No___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer ___

Non-accelerated filer ___ Smaller reporting company ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes___ No X

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of July 31, 2009: 64,195,084 shares of common stock, $1 par value

_______________________________________________________________________________

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009

INDEX

Part I. Financial Information
	Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	Page
	a)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	3
	b)	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets As of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008	4
	c)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	5
	d)	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009	6
	e)	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	28
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29
Part II. Other Information
	Item 6.	Exhibits	30
Signatures			31

PART I. ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008

REVENUES:
Contract drilling	$	149,307		$	141,372		$	455,463		$	365,950

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Contract drilling		58,366			57,094			166,771			159,999
Depreciation		9,529			8,871			25,581			25,914
General and administrative		6,894			7,567			24,783			23,049
(Gain) loss on sale of equipment, net		129			(129	)		(52	)		(214	)
		74,918			73,403			217,083			208,748
OPERATING INCOME		74,389			67,969			238,380			157,202

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest		(735	)		(204	)		(1,644	)		(1,146	)
Interest income		90			301			257			1,475
		(645	)		97			(1,387	)		329
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		73,744			68,066			236,993			157,531
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		6,073			7,685			34,532			16,846
NET INCOME	$	67,671		$	60,381		$	202,461		$	140,685

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (NOTE 3):
Basic	$	1.05		$	0.94		$	3.16		$	2.21
Diluted		1.05			0.93			3.14			2.18
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING (NOTE 3):
Basic		64,190			64,023			64,152			63,665
Diluted		64,617			64,776			64,395			64,509

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I. ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

		June 30,		September 30,
		2009		2008

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	91,032	$	121,092
Accounts receivable, net of an allowance
of $1,051 and $114 at June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2008, respectively		126,012		132,367
Insurance receivable		6,940		-
Income tax receivable		5,838		3,292
Inventories of materials and supplies		53,531		37,906
Deferred tax assets		25		21
Prepaid expenses and deferred costs		2,814		10,225
Total Current Assets		286,192		304,903

NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT		1,112,044		787,838

DEFERRED COSTS AND OTHER ASSETS		6,749		3,856
	$	1,404,985	$	1,096,597

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	18,124	$	16,987
Accrued liabilities		37,227		23,551
Income tax payable		22,225		16,009
Deferred credits		6,123		304
Total Current Liabilities		83,699		56,851

LONG-TERM DEBT		250,000		170,000

LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
Deferred income taxes		8,516		10,595
Deferred credits		3,166		7,942
Other		7,503		7,519
		19,185		26,056

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (SEE NOTE 9)

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value;
1,000 shares authorized, none outstanding		-		-
Common stock, $1 par value: 90,000 shares
authorized with 64,195 and 64,031 issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2008, respectively		64,195		64,031
Paid-in capital		120,590		114,804
Retained earnings		867,316		664,855
Total Shareholders' Equity		1,052,101		843,690
	$	1,404,985	$	1,096,597

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I. ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008

CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	202,461		$	140,685
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation		25,581			25,914
Amortization of debt issuance costs		515			586
Amortization of deferred items		(9,335	)		(7,726	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		937			240
Provision for inventory obsolesence		240			130
Deferred income tax benefit		(2,083	)		(2,273	)
Stock-based compensation expense		5,884			5,644
Gains on sale of equipment		(52	)		(214	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		5,418			(35,168	)
Increase in insurance receivable		(461	)		-
Increase in income tax receivable		(2,546	)		(486	)
Increase in inventory		(16,144	)		(7,535	)
Decrease in prepaid expenses		7,419			7,381
Increase in deferred costs and other assets		(2,593	)		(1,162	)
Increase in accounts payable		57			5,453
Increase in accrued liabilities		12,143			3,657
Increase in income tax payable		6,216			2,962
Increase (decrease) in deferred credits and other liabilities		12,150			(663	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		245,807			137,425

CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(353,610	)		(193,281	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		288			267
Net cash used by investing activities		(353,322	)		(193,014	)

CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on debt		(50,000	)		(18,000	)
Proceeds from debt		130,000			170,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		66			5,988
Debt issuance costs paid		(2,611	)		(1,336	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		77,455			156,652

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	$	(30,060	)	$	101,063
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, at beginning of period	$	121,092		$	100,361
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, at end of period	$	91,032		$	201,424
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-cash activities
Increase in insurance receivable related to reduction in value
of spare capital equipment and inventory	$	6,479		$	-
Increase in accrued liabilities related to capital
expenditures	$	2,613		$	9,973

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I. ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES

IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY



										Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in			Retained		Shareholders’
(In thousands)	Shares		Amount		Capital			Earnings		Equity


September 30, 2008		64,031	$	64,031	$	114,804		$	664,855	$	843,690
Net income		-		-		-			202,461		202,461
Restricted stock awards		157		157		(157	)		-		-
Exercise of employee stock options		7		7		59			-		66
Stock option and restricted stock
award compensation expense		-		-		5,884			-		5,884
June 30, 2009		64,195	$	64,195	$	120,590		$	867,316	$	1,052,101

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I. ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. UNAUDITED INTERIM INFORMATION

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, included herein, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The year end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements as of September 30, 2008. Although these financial statements and related information have been prepared without audit, and certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, we believe that the note disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading. The interim financial results may not be indicative of results that could be expected for a full fiscal year. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended September 30, 2008. In our opinion, the unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of our financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year end financial statements to conform to the current interim period presentation.

2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

We recognize compensation expense on grants of share-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the required service period for each award. As of June 30, 2009, unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options and restricted stock awards was approximately $4.6 million and $8.2 million, respectively, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years. The recognition of share-based compensation expense had the following effect on our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months			Nine Months
	Ended			Ended
June 30, 2009:
Increase in contract drilling expenses	$	574		$	1,712
Increase in general and administrative expenses		1,346			4,172
Decrease in income tax provision		(471	)		(1,460	)
Decrease of net income	$	1,449		$	4,424

Decrease in earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.02		$	0.07
Diluted	$	0.02		$	0.07


June 30, 2008:
Increase in contract drilling expenses	$	599		$	1,496
Increase in general and administrative expenses		1,555			4,148
Decrease in income tax provision		(544	)		(1,452	)
Decrease of net income	$	1,610		$	4,192

Decrease in earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.03		$	0.07
Diluted	$	0.02		$	0.06

Awards of restricted stock and stock options have both been granted under our stock incentive plans during the current fiscal year. We deliver newly issued shares of common stock for restricted stock awards upon vesting and upon exercise of stock options. All stock incentive plans currently in effect have been approved by the shareholders of our outstanding common stock.

Stock Options

Under our stock incentive plans, the exercise price of each stock option equals the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant, with all outstanding options having a maximum term of 10 years. Options vest ratably over a period from the end of the first to the fourth year from the date of grant. Each option is for the purchase of one share of our common stock.

The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 was $5.75. We estimated the fair value of each stock option then outstanding using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions for the nine months ended June 30, 2009:

Risk-Free Interest Rate	1.5%
Expected Volatility	42%
Expected Life (Years)	5.2
Dividend Yield	None

The average risk-free interest rate is based on the five-year U.S. treasury security rate in effect as of the grant date. We determined expected volatility using a six year historical volatility figure and determined the expected term of the stock options using 10 years of historical data. We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock.

A summary of stock option activity during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:

						Wtd. Avg.
				Wtd. Avg.		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Options (000s)			Price		Life (Years)		Value (000s)
Outstanding at October 1, 2008		1,253		$	18.82		6.5	$	22,035
Granted		286		$	14.65
Exercised		(7	)	$	10.20			$	91
Forfeited		(19	)	$	26.46
Outstanding at June 30, 2009		1,513		$	17.97		6.5	$	10,505
Exercisable at June 30, 2009		962		$	14.67		5.2	$	9,859

Restricted Stock

We have also awarded restricted stock to certain employees and to our non-employee directors. For our employees, the awards of restricted stock have vesting periods and restrictions on transfer ranging from three to four years from the date of grant. Awards of restricted stock to our non-employee directors made prior to Amendment No. 1 to the Atwood Oceanics, Inc. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) have vesting periods ranging from immediately to three years, with restrictions on transfer for three years from the date of grant. Awards of restricted stock to our non-employee directors made after Amendment No. 1 to the 2007 Plan have a vesting period and restrictions on transfer for 13 months from the date of grant. We value restricted stock awards at fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

A summary of restricted stock activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, is as follows:

	Number of			Wtd. Avg.
	Shares (000s)			Fair Value
Unvested at September 30, 2008		581		$	32.50
Granted		173		$	14.65
Vested		(157	)	$	19.82
Forfeited		(11	)	$	32.58
Unvested at June 30, 2009		586		$	30.63

3. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended

	Net				Per Share			Net				Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount			Income		Shares		Amount
June 30, 2009:
Basic earnings per share	$	67,671		64,190	$	1.05		$	202,461		64,152	$	3.16
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		---		427	$	-			---		243	$	(0.02	)

Diluted earnings per share	$	67,671		64,617	$	1.05		$	202,461		64,395	$	3.14

June 30, 2008:
Basic earnings per share	$	60,381		64,023	$	0.94		$	140,685		63,665	$	2.21
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		---		753	$	(0.01	)		---		844	$	(0.03	)

Diluted earnings per share	$	60,381		64,776	$	0.93		$	140,685		64,509	$	2.18

The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 excludes consideration of shares of common stock related to 316,000 outstanding stock options because such options were anti-dilutive. These options could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future.

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of property and equipment by classification is as follows (in thousands):

			June 30,			September 30,
			2009			2008

Drilling vessels and related equipment
	Cost		$	1,455,268		$	1,106,709
	Accumulated depreciation			(347,868	)		(324,376	)
		Net book value		1,107,400			782,333

Drill Pipe
	Cost			15,275			15,568
	Accumulated depreciation			(12,700	)		(12,139	)
		Net book value		2,575			3,429

Furniture and other
	Cost			9,863			9,423
	Accumulated depreciation			(7,794	)		(7,347	)
		Net book value		2,069			2,076

NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT			$	1,112,044		$	787,838

As of June 30, 2009, we had approximately $245 million and $279 million of construction in progress related to the construction of the ATWOOD OSPREY, our new conventionally moored semisubmersible, and our new to-be-named dynamically positioned semisubmersible, respectively, of which $286 million was expended in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. Between September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2009, we also expended approximately $45 million on the ATWOOD AURORA, for a total construction cost of $197 million, which commenced operations in April 2009.

Warehouse Fire

On October 25, 2008, a fire occurred in a third party warehouse facility in Houston, Texas that we use to store fleetwide spare capital equipment. In addition, this third party provides international freight forwarding services, and thus, the location was also used as a staging area for equipment shipments to our international fleet. Although the fire was contained primarily to one area of the facility, we did incur significant damage to our fleet spares and other equipment in-transit. We have insurance to cover the cost of replacing and repairing damaged equipment in excess of a $2,500 deductible. The amount of the deductible was recorded as an expense during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.

We are continuing the process of evaluating the fire damage to determine if the equipment can be repaired or if it must be replaced. The process is anticipated to last well in to the second half of calendar year 2009. However, based on the work to date, estimated property losses plus actual costs incurred to inspect and evaluate damaged equipment is approximately $6.9 million. Thus, as of June 30, 2009, an insurance receivable has been recorded for our estimated insurance recoveries in an amount equal to the estimated losses and actual costs, less our deductible.

5.	LONG-TERM DEBT

A summary of long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,		September 30,
	2009		2008
2007 credit facility, bearing interest (market adjustable)
at approximately 1.9% and 3.5% per annum at
June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively	$	200,000	$	170,000
2008 credit facility, bearing interest (market adjustable)
at approximately 4.1% per annum at June 30, 2009		50,000		-
	$	250,000	$	170,000

During October 2007, we entered into a credit agreement with several banks, with Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent for the lenders, as well as Lead Arranger and Book Runner (the “2007 Credit Agreement”). The 2007 Credit Agreement provides for a secured 5-year $300 million revolving loan facility with maturity in October 2012, subject to acceleration upon certain specified events of default, including but not limited to: delinquent payments, bankruptcy filings, breaches of representation or covenants, material adverse judgments, guarantees or security documents not in full effect, non-compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, defaults under other agreements including existing credit agreements, and a change in control. In addition, the 2007 Credit Facility contains a number of limitations on our ability to: incur liens; merge, consolidate or sell assets; pay dividends; incur additional indebtedness; make advances, investments or loans; and transact with affiliates.

Loans under this facility will bear interest at varying rates ranging from 0.70% to 1.25% over the Eurodollar Rate, depending upon the ratio of outstanding debt to earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation. The credit agreement supports the issuance, when required, of standby letters of credit. The collateral for the 2007 Credit Agreement consists primarily of preferred mortgages on three of our active drilling units (the ATWOOD EAGLE, the ATWOOD HUNTER and the ATWOOD BEACON). Under the 2007 Credit Facility, we are required to pay a fee ranging from 0.225% - 0.375% per annum on the unused portion of the credit facility and certain other administrative costs. As of June 30, 2009, we have $100 million of funds available to borrow under this credit facility, with standby letters of credit in the aggregate amount of approximately $4.6 million outstanding.

During November 2008, we entered into a new credit agreement with several banks with Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York Branch as Administrative Agent for the lenders, as well as Lead Arranger and Book Runner (“the 2008 Credit Facility”). The 2008 Credit Facility provides for a secured 5-year $280 million reducing revolving loan facility with maturity in November 2013, subject to acceleration upon certain specified events of default, including but not limited to: delinquent payments, bankruptcy filings, breaches of representation or covenants, material adverse judgments, guarantees or security documents not in full effect, non-compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, defaults under other agreements including existing credit agreements, such as our 2007 Credit Facility, and a change in control. In addition, the 2008 Credit Facility contains a number of limitations on our ability to: incur liens; merge, consolidate or sell assets; pay dividends; incur additional indebtedness; make advances, investments or loans; and transact with affiliates.

The 2008 Credit Facility requires a mandatory quarterly commitment reduction of $7 million beginning at the earlier of three months after delivery of either semisubmersible drilling unit currently under construction or December 31, 2011. The commitment under this facility may be increased up to $20 million for a total commitment of $300 million. Loans under the 2008 Credit Facility will bear interest at 1.50% over the Eurodollar Rate. The collateral for the 2008 Credit Facility consists primarily of preferred mortgages on three of our drilling units (the ATWOOD FALCON, the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS, and the ATWOOD AURORA). Under the 2008 Credit Facility, we are required to pay a fee of 0.75% per annum on the unused portion of the credit facility and certain other administrative costs. As of June 30, 2009, we have $230 million of funds available to borrow under this credit facility, with standby letters of credit in the aggregate amount of approximately $0.7 million outstanding.

The 2008 Credit Facility and the 2007 Credit Facility contain various financial covenants that, among other things, require the maintenance of a leverage ratio, not to exceed 5.0 to 1.0, an interest expense coverage ratio not to be less than 2.5 to 1.0 and a required level of collateral maintenance whereby the aggregate appraised collateral value shall not be less than 150% of the total credit facility commitment. As of June 30, 2009, our leverage ratio was 0.46, our interest expense coverage ratio was 30.1 and our collateral maintenance percentage was in excess of 300%. We were in compliance with all financial covenants under the 2008 Credit Facility and the 2007 Credit Facility at June 30, 2009 and at all times during the nine months ended June 30, 2009. As of August 5, 2009, no additional funds have been borrowed under either the 2007 Credit Facility or the 2008 Credit Facility subsequent to June 30, 2009.

6.	FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On October 1, 2008, we adopted, without any impact to our financial position, operating results or cash flows, the provisions of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement”, for our financial assets and liabilities with respect to which we have recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2009, the carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables approximated their fair values due to the short maturity of such financial instruments. The carrying amount of our floating-rate debt approximated its fair value at June 30, 2009 as such instruments bear short-term, market-based interest rates.

7.	INCOME TAXES

At June 30, 2009, we had approximately $2.7 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions, including estimated accrued interest and penalties of $0.3 million which are included as Other Long Term Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. At June 30, 2009, all $2.7 million of the net uncertain tax liabilities would affect our effective tax rate if recognized. A summary of activity related to the net uncertain tax positions for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):

	Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions

Balance at October 1, 2008	$	3,492

Increases based on tax positions
related to the current fiscal year	$	289
Decreases based on tax positions
related to prior fiscal years		(1,044	)

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	2,737

Our United States tax returns for fiscal year 2006 and subsequent years remain subject to examination by tax authorities. As we conduct business globally, we have various tax years remaining open to examination in our international tax jurisdictions. We do not anticipate that any tax contingencies resolved during the next 12 months will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

8. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 157-4 "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" ("FSP FAS 157-4"). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The staff position also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. We adopted FSP FAS 157-4 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 with no material impact to our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1"). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies in addition to annual financial statements. The staff position also amends APB Opinion No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting", to require fair value disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 with no significant changes to the disclosures in our financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of events that occur, after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 165 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 with no significant changes to subsequent events that we are required to recognize or disclose in our financial statements. We have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through August 6, 2009 which is the date the financial statements were issued.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). On the effective date of SFAS 168, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Following SFAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or EITF Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates to update the Codification. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We anticipate the adoption of FAS 168 will not have a material impact to the Company.

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are party to a number of lawsuits which are ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business, the outcome of which, individually, or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Other Matters

The ATWOOD BEACON operated in India from early December 2006 to the end of July 2009. A service tax was enacted in 2004 on revenues derived from seismic and exploration activities. This service tax law was subsequently amended on June 1, 2007 and again in 2008 to state that revenues derived from mining services and drilling services were specifically subject to this service tax. The ATWOOD BEACON contract terms with our customer in India provided that any liability incurred by us related to any taxes pursuant to laws not in effect at the time the contract was executed in 2005 was to be reimbursed by our customer. In our opinion, which is supported by our legal and tax advisors, any such service taxes assessed by the Indian tax authorities under either provision of the 2007 or 2008 amendments would be the obligation of our customer. Our customer is disputing this obligation on the basis, in their opinion, that revenues derived from drilling services were taxable under the initial 2004 law, which, based on our contract terms, would provide that the service tax is our obligation.

After reviewing the status of the drilling service we provided to our customer, the Indian tax authorities assessed service tax obligations on revenues derived from the ATWOOD BEACON commencing on June 1, 2007. The relevant Indian tax authority issued an extensive written ruling on this matter setting forth the proper application of the June 1, 2007 service tax regulation, confirming our position on this matter that the drilling services were not covered by the original 2004 service tax law. Therefore, as the Indian tax authority’s service tax assessments was made under the provision of the 2007 amendment to the service tax law and not pursuant to a law in effect at the time we executed the ATWOOD BEACON contract, we believe our customer is obligated under the terms of our contract to reimburse us for all service tax payments.

As of June 30, 2009, we have paid to the Indian government $7.7 million in service tax and have accrued $3.7 million of additional obligations in accrued liabilities and recorded a corresponding $11.4 million account receivable from our customer for such service taxes. We plan to pursue all options available to us to collect this account receivable from our customer for such service taxes.

PART I. ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 includes statements about Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (which together with its subsidiaries is identified as the “Company,” “we,” or “our,” unless the context indicates otherwise) which are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) which are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our representatives may, from time to time, make other oral or written statements which are also forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are made based upon management's current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us, and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

Important factors that could cause our actual results of operations, financial conditions or cash flows to differ include, but are not necessarily limited to:

our dependence on the oil and gas industry;

the operational risks involved in drilling for oil and gas;

risks associated with the current global economic crisis and its impact on capital markets, liquidity and financing of future drilling activity;

changes in rig utilization and dayrates in response to the level of activity in the oil and gas industry, which is significantly affected by indications and expectations regarding the level and volatility of oil and gas prices, which in turn are affected by political, economic and weather conditions affecting or potentially affecting regional or worldwide demand for oil and gas, actions or anticipated actions by OPEC, inventory levels, deliverability constraints, and future market activity;

the extent to which customers and potential customers continue to pursue deepwater drilling;

exploration success or lack of exploration success by our customers and potential customers;

the highly competitive and cyclical nature of our business, with periods of low demand and excess rig availability;

the impact of possible disruption in operations due to terrorism, acts of piracy, embargoes, war or other military operations;

our ability to enter into and the terms of future drilling contracts;

the availability of qualified personnel;

our failure to retain the business of one or more significant customers;

the termination or renegotiation of contracts by customers;

the availability of adequate insurance at a reasonable cost;

the occurrence of an uninsured loss;

the risks of international operations, including possible economic, political, social or monetary instability and compliance with foreign laws;

the effect public health concerns could have on our international operations and financial results;

compliance with or breach of environmental laws;

the incurrence of secured debt or additional unsecured indebtedness or other obligations by us or our subsidiaries;

the adequacy of sources of liquidity for our operations and those of our customers;

currently unknown rig repair needs and/or additional opportunities to accelerate planned maintenance expenditures due to presently unanticipated rig downtime;

higher than anticipated accruals for performance-based compensation due to better than anticipated performance by us, higher than anticipated severance expenses due to unanticipated employee terminations, higher than anticipated legal and accounting fees due to unanticipated financing or other corporate transactions and other factors that could increase general and administrative expenses;

the actions of our competitors in the offshore drilling industry, which could significantly influence rig dayrates and utilization;

changes in the geographic areas in which our customers plan to operate or the tax rate in such jurisdiction, which in turn could change our expected effective tax rate;

changes in oil and gas drilling technology or in our competitors' drilling rig fleets that could make our drilling rigs less competitive or require major capital investments to keep them competitive;

rig availability;

the effects and uncertainties of legal and administrative proceedings and other contingencies;

the impact of governmental laws and regulations and the uncertainties involved in their administration, particularly in some foreign jurisdictions;

changes in accepted interpretations of accounting guidelines and other accounting pronouncements and tax laws;

-	risks involved in the construction of a dynamically positioned semisubmersible drilling unit without a contract;

-	although our current long-term contract commitments do not provide for early termination due to market deterioration, market declines could result in requests to amend some of these contracts which, if amended, could alter the timing and amount of our current contracted cash flows;

the risks involved in the construction, upgrade and repair of our drilling units, including project delays effecting our ability to meet contractual commitments, as well as commencement of operations of our drilling units following delivery; and

-	such other factors as may be discussed in this report and our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results. The words “believe,” “impact,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout the Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Part I, Item 2 hereof and elsewhere in this report. When considering any forward-looking statement, you should also keep in mind the risk factors described in other reports or filings we make with the SEC from time to time, including our Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only on the date hereof. Neither we nor our representatives have a general obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MARKET OUTLOOK

The current global financial recession continues to negatively impact the worldwide offshore drilling market. Due to the ongoing negative market environment, oil and gas companies continue to delay certain exploration, development and production activities. These delays have led to significantly reduced contract bid requests which have resulted in declining dayrates, increasing worldwide rig fleet availability for jack-up rigs and semisubmersible drilling units technically similar to the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS and increasing bidding competition for future contract opportunities. The continuing delivery of newly constructed jack-up rigs is also negatively impacting the worldwide supply relative to current market demand. Despite the declining trends for jack-up drilling and semisubmersible drilling for rigs like the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS, we believe that the long-term outlook for the worldwide deepwater drilling remains positive. The current global financial crisis has also created significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit, and, while not currently impacting us, this could adversely affect our customers’ and lenders’ ability to fulfill their obligations to us in the future.

While we are now seeing some signs of increased interest for drilling programs later this fiscal year and next fiscal year, there still remains uncertainty with regard to future work and dayrates for our three idle rigs that are current without future contracts: the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS, the ATWOOD BEACON and the RICHMOND. The ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS has been idle since mid-December 2008, the ATWOOD BEACON became idle at the end of July 2009 and the RICHMOND has been idle since early June 2009. We are pursuing additional contract commitments for these three rigs; however, there is no guarantee that we will not continue to incur idle time on some or all of these units for the remainder of fiscal year 2009 and into fiscal year 2010.

We are currently building two semisubmersibles for deepwater drilling: (1) the ATWOOD OSPREY, a conventionally moored, 6,000 foot water depth unit, (scheduled for delivery in early 2011, with an estimated total cost of $600 million to $625 million), and (2) a to-be-named dynamically positioned, 10,000 foot water depth unit (scheduled for delivery in mid-2012, with an estimated total cost of approximately $750 million). Through June 30, 2009, we have invested approximately $525 million toward the construction of these two drilling units. We expect funding of the $825 million to $850 million remaining on the construction of these two units will come from internally generated funds and borrowings under our two credit facilities.

With the April 2009 commencement of drilling operations of the ATWOOD AURORA, we now have nine (9) owned operational drilling units and two (2) drilling units currently under construction, of which five (5) have current contract commitments that extend into fiscal year 2011 or later; one (1) has a current contract commitment that extends through fiscal year 2010; one (1) has a firm three month commitment commencing in September 2009; three (3) have no current contract commitments; and one (1) under construction, scheduled for delivery in mid-2012, is currently also without a contract. We currently have an estimated contract revenue backlog of approximately $1.8 billion compared to approximately $1.0 billion of current estimated capital commitments relating primarily to the two new semisubmersibles under construction.

Currently, we have approximately 65% and 60% of our available rig days contracted for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, respectively. A comparison of the average per day revenues for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 and for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 for our active drilling units is as follows:

Average Per Day Revenues
	Fiscal Year 2007		Fiscal Year 2008			First Nine Months of Fiscal Year 2009

ATWOOD HUNTER	$	234,000	$	246,000		$	514,000
ATWOOD EAGLE		160,000		241,000			395,000
ATWOOD FALCON		138,000		216,000			201,000
ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS		171,000		321,000			94,000	(1)
VICKSBURG		110,000		155,000			145,000	(2)
ATWOOD BEACON		109,000		128,000			130,000
ATWOOD AURORA		N/A		N/A			128,000	(3)
SEAHAWK		84,000		88,000			86,000
RICHMOND		81,000		44,000	(4)		69,000


(1) Rig has been idle since mid-December 2008.
(2) Rig is currently undergoing a life-enhancing upgrade.
(3) Rig commenced operations on April 21, 2009.
(4) Rig incurred a life-enhancing upgrade during fiscal year 2008.

The ATWOOD HUNTER is currently working under contract commitments that extend to October/November 2012 at operating dayrates that range from $538,000 to $545,000, subject to adjustment for cost escalations. The ATWOOD EAGLE is currently working under a contract commitment offshore Australia at a dayrate of $405,000, which extends to June 2010. Following completion of this commitment, the rig will commence a drilling program that could extend for six months or longer at a dayrate of approximately $430,000 to approximately $450,000, subject to adjustment for cost escalations. The ATWOOD FALCON is currently working under a contract until August 19, 2009 at a dayrate of $160,000. Following completion of this contract commitment, the rig will then commence a two-year contract commitment on August 20, 2009 at a dayrate of $425,000, subject to adjustment for cost escalations.

The ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS has been idle since mid-December 2008. Before that, the rig was working at a dayrate of $352,000. The rig has been undergoing certain equipment repairs and maintenance which has kept its average operating costs relatively high at approximately $65,000 per day during this idle period. Per day operating costs are expected to decline below $50,000 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and stay at this level as long as the rig remains “ready stacked.” On June 23, 2009, the VICKSBURG completed its contract offshore Thailand and was immediately moved to a shipyard in Thailand to undergo an approximate $8 million life-enhancing upgrade. This upgrade is expected to be completed on or before August 28, 2009. Upon completion of this upgrade, the VICKSBURG will commence working offshore Thailand under a firm three month contract which could be extended to six months. This contract provides for a dayrate of $90,000 to $95,000 depending of the term of the contract, compared to its previous contract dayrate of approximately $154,000. The ATWOOD BEACON completed its contract offshore India at the end of July 2009 and is currently demobilizing to a stacking location offshore India. During this initial stacking period, the rig will undergo certain maintenance that will keep its operating costs for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 relatively high at approximately $65,000 per day. On April 21, 2009, the ATWOOD AURORA commenced working offshore Egypt under its two-year contract at a dayrate of $133,000.

The SEAHAWK is working offshore West Africa under a drilling contract that currently extends into September 2010. For the prior two fiscal years, the SEAHAWK’s operating costs exceeded or were relatively consistent with revenues; however, for fiscal year 2009, we expect that its revenue will exceed operating costs. Our only rig in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the RICHMOND, is currently “ready stacked” after completing its contract in early June 2009. We believe this rig will return to work before the end of the calendar year at a dayrate that could be in the $30,000’s. Upon delivery, the ATWOOD OSPREY has a three-year contract that provides for a dayrate of $470,000, with an option to extend this commitment to six years at a dayrate of $450,000. Both dayrates are subject to adjustments for cost escalations. We expect this drilling unit will be mobilized to Australia in early calendar year 2011. Our to-be-named dynamically positioned semisubmersible is currently without a contract.

We currently have $250 million borrowed under our credit facilities, which have a combined borrowing capacity of $580 million, and expect that our outstanding debt will be around $300 million by the end of fiscal year 2009, with a total debt to capitalization ratio of just over 20%. Our objective is to endeavor to keep our maximum borrowing below $450 million during the construction of our two deepwater semisubmersibles. With our approximate $1.8 billion of contracted backlog revenues expected to remain intact, since our current long-term contract commitments do not provide for early termination or modification due to market deterioration, coupled with our additional borrowing capacity of around $330 million (with a current average interest cost of less than 3%), we believe that we can complete the funding of the construction of our two deepwater semisubmersibles and maintain a strong balance sheet without requiring any additional sources of capital. We will remain focused on executing our current newbuild program and do not anticipate pursuing any further growth at this time.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 increased 6% and 24%, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. A comparative analysis of revenues is as follows:

	REVENUES
	(In millions)
	Three Months Ended June 30,							Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		Variance			2009		2008		Variance

ATWOOD HUNTER	$	48.6	$	21.5	$	27.1		$	140.5	$	67.7	$	72.8
ATWOOD EAGLE		36.5		26.1		10.4			107.9		53.3		54.6
ATWOOD AURORA		9.1		-		9.1			9.1		-		9.1
ATWOOD FALCON		18.3		17.2		1.1			55.0		51.0		4.0
SEAHAWK		8.0		8.3		(0.3	)		23.4		24.1		(0.7	)
ATWOOD BEACON		11.6		12.3		(0.7	)		35.5		34.5		1.0
VICKSBURG		12.8		13.9		(1.1	)		39.6		42.6		(3.0	)
RICHMOND		4.4		6.0		(1.6	)		18.9		9.9		9.0
ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS		-		36.1		(36.1	)		25.6		82.9		(57.3	)
	$	149.3	$	141.4	$	7.9		$	455.5	$	366.0	$	89.5

Increases in revenues for the ATWOOD HUNTER and ATWOOD EAGLE were related to each drilling unit working under significantly higher dayrate contracts during the current quarter and fiscal year to date period compared to the prior fiscal year periods. Our new drilling rig, the ATWOOD AURORA, commenced drilling operations in April 2009 and thus, earned no revenue in the prior fiscal year periods. Revenues for the ATWOOD FALCON, SEAHAWK, ATWOOD BEACON and VICKSBURG during the current quarter and fiscal year to date period were relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year periods. The decrease in revenue for the RICHMOND for the current quarter is due to the rig becoming idle in early June 2009 compared to no idle time in the prior fiscal year quarter, while the increase in revenue for the fiscal year to date period is due to the rig being in a shipyard undergoing a life-enhancing upgrade for a significant portion of the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2008 and thus, earning no revenue during that time as compared to the current fiscal year in which it had been continuously working until early June 2009. Since the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS has been idle and earning no revenue since mid December 2008, revenues have decreased during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.

Contract drilling costs for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 increased 2% and 4%, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. An analysis of contract drilling costs by rig is as follows:

	CONTRACT DRILLING COSTS
	(In millions)
	Three Months Ended June 30,							Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		Variance			2009		2008		Variance

ATWOOD AURORA	$	4.7	$	-	$	4.7		$	4.7	$	-	$	4.7
ATWOOD HUNTER		9.4		7.4		2.0			26.8		21.9		4.9
ATWOOD EAGLE		12.8		12.5		0.3			34.2		32.6		1.6
ATWOOD FALCON		6.4		6.6		(0.2	)		19.5		18.0		1.5
RICHMOND		3.5		3.7		(0.2	)		10.3		8.4		1.9
ATWOOD BEACON		4.4		4.9		(0.5	)		13.7		14.3		(0.6	)
VICKSBURG		4.5		5.3		(0.8	)		12.7		14.1		(1.4	)
SEAHAWK		6.7		7.7		(1.0	)		18.3		24.0		(5.7	)
ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS		5.5		8.1		(2.6	)		19.6		24.4		(4.8	)
OTHER		0.5		0.9		(0.4	)		7.0		2.3		4.7
	$	58.4	$	57.1	$	1.3		$	166.8	$	160.0	$	6.8

Our new drilling rig, the ATWOOD AURORA, commenced drilling operations in April 2009 and thus, incurred no contract drilling costs in the prior fiscal year periods. The increase in contract drilling costs for the ATWOOD HUNTER for the current quarter and fiscal year to date period is primarily due to higher agent fees which are based on a percentage of dayrates. Contract drilling costs for the ATWOOD EAGLE and ATWOOD FALCON for the current quarter and fiscal year to date periods were relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year periods. While current quarter contact drilling costs for the RICHMOND were consistent with the prior fiscal year quarter, the increase in contract drilling costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 is due to the rig incurring significantly less operating costs during the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2008 as the rig was in a shipyard undergoing a life enhancing upgrade, partially offset by higher maintenance costs during the upgrade. The decrease in contract drilling costs for the ATWOOD BEACON and VICKSBURG for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 is due to decreases in equipment related costs primarily associated with the amount and timing of maintenance projects when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008. While contract drilling costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 for the ATWOOD BEACON were consistent with the prior fiscal year period, the decrease in contract drilling costs for the VICKSBURG is also due to a decrease in equipment related costs and due to certain operating taxes incurred during the prior fiscal year, compared to no operating taxes in the current fiscal year. The decrease in contract drilling costs for the SEAHAWK for both the current quarter and fiscal year to date period ended June 30, 2009 is due to the amortization of deferred expenses in the prior fiscal year which ended during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. The decrease in drilling costs for the ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 is due to a decrease in agent fees and headcount reduction of non-essential personnel as the rig has been idle since mid-December 2008. Other drilling costs have decreased for the current quarter primarily due to recent exchange rate gains resulting from the strengthening United States dollar. However, the increase for the current fiscal year to date period is due to an overall exchange loss during fiscal year 2009 compared to an overall exchange gain in fiscal year 2008.

We expect that our operating costs for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 will be approximately $58 million. For fiscal year 2009, we currently expect an approximate 4% increase in total operating costs when compared to fiscal year 2008 with primarily all of the increase due to the commencement of drilling operations for the ATWOOD AURORA during the current fiscal year.

Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 increased by 7% and decreased by 1%, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. An analysis of depreciation expense by rig is as follows:

	DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
	(In millions)
	Three Months Ended June 30,							Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		Variance			2009		2008		Variance

ATWOOD AURORA	$	1.4	$	-	$	1.4		$	1.4	$	-	$	1.4
ATWOOD HUNTER		1.6		1.5		0.1			4.7		4.4		0.3
ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS		1.0		0.9		0.1			2.9		2.8		0.1
ATWOOD FALCON		1.4		1.3		0.1			4.0		3.9		0.1
RICHMOND		0.4		0.4		-			1.3		0.6		0.7
VICKSBURG		0.7		0.7		-			2.1		2.1		-
ATWOOD EAGLE		1.1		1.1		-			3.4		3.4		-
ATWOOD BEACON		1.2		1.3		(0.1	)		3.7		3.8		(0.1	)
SEAHAWK		0.6		1.6		(1.0	)		1.8		4.6		(2.8	)
OTHER		0.1		0.1		-			0.3		0.3		-
	$	9.5	$	8.9	$	0.6		$	25.6	$	25.9	$	(0.3	)

Our new drilling rig, the ATWOOD AURORA, was placed into service during April 2009 and thus, incurred no depreciation expense prior to the current quarter. In accordance with our company policy, no depreciation expense was recorded for a significant portion of the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2008 for the RICHMOND, as the rig was undergoing a life enhancing upgrade to extend its remaining depreciable life from one to ten years. Effective October 1, 2008, we extended the remaining depreciable life of the SEAHAWK from one year to five years based upon the length of its current contract commitment coupled with our intent to continue marketing and operating the rig beyond one year as the rig is technically capable of working over this revised period. Depreciation expense for all other rigs has remained relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year periods.

General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 increased when compared to the prior fiscal year periods primarily due to rising personnel costs, which include headcount and wages increases and increased annual bonus compensation costs. Interest expense has increased for the current quarter and fiscal year to date period due to higher debt balances when compared to the prior fiscal year periods. Interest income has decreased as interest rates have decreased significantly when compared to the prior fiscal year periods.

Virtually all of our tax provision for each of the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 relates to taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, due to the high level of operating income earned in certain nontaxable and deemed profit tax jurisdictions during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our effective tax rate for these periods was significantly less than the United States federal statutory rate. Our effective rate for the current quarter of 8% is relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year quarter effective rate of 11%, while our effective rate for the fiscal year to date period of 15% is higher than the 11% effective rate in the prior fiscal year primarily due to a significantly lower level of operating income earned in certain nontaxable and deemed profit tax jurisdictions during the current fiscal year. Excluding any discrete items that may be incurred, we expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 15% for fiscal year 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of June 30, 2009 and August 5, 2009, we have $200 million borrowed under our 5-year $300 million credit facility executed in October 2007 (the “2007 Credit Facility”) and $50 million borrowed under our 5-year $280 million credit facility executed in November 2008 (the “2008 Credit Facility”). Both credit facilities contain various financial covenants that, among other things, require the maintenance of certain leverage and interest expense coverage ratios. The collateral for these two credit facilities, collectively, primarily consists of preferred mortgages on six of our drilling units (ATWOOD EAGLE, ATWOOD HUNTER, ATWOOD FALCON, ATWOOD SOUTHERN CROSS, ATWOOD AURORA and ATWOOD BEACON). These credit facilities will provide funding to complete the construction of our two deepwater semisubmersibles being constructed in Singapore and funding for general corporate needs. We were in compliance with all financial covenants under both credit facilities at June 30, 2009, at all times during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 for the 2007 Credit Facility and since inception for the 2008 Credit Facility. For more information see footnote 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our newly constructed jack-up unit, the ATWOOD AURORA, commenced operations in April 2009 with a total capitalized cost (after being relocated from its construction site in the United States to its first drilling location offshore Egypt) of approximately $197 million, with $45 million being incurred in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we had expended approximately $245 million towards the construction of the ATWOOD OSPREY and $279 million towards the construction of our to-be-named dynamically positioned semisubmersible, with expected total construction costs of approximately $600 million to $625 million and approximately $750 million, respectively. In addition to these construction projects, we anticipate that the current upgrade of VICKSBURG will cost approximately $8 million and is expected to be completed on or before August 28, 2009.

Since we operate in a very cyclical industry, maintaining high equipment utilization in up, as well as down, cycles is a key factor in generating cash to satisfy current and future obligations. For fiscal years 2002 through 2008, net cash provided by operating activities ranged from a low of approximately $14 million in fiscal year 2003 to a high of approximately $192 million in fiscal year 2008. For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $246 million. Our operating cash flows are primarily driven by our operating income, which reflects dayrates and rig utilization. During the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, we used internally generated cash and funds borrowed under our credit facilities to expend approximately $45 million toward the completion of the construction of the ATWOOD AURORA, approximately $286 million towards the construction of the two deepwater semisubmersibles, and approximately $23 million in other capital expenditures.

We estimate that our total capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 will be approximately $50 million, and expect to end fiscal year 2009 with outstanding long-term debt around $300 million. With our current contract commitments providing for approximately $1.8 billion of backlogged revenues, coupled with our current additional borrowing capacity of $330 million under our credit facilities, we believe that we can fund the remaining construction costs of our two deepwater semisubmersibles and maintain a strong balance sheet without the need for any additional sources of capital.

Our portfolio of accounts receivable is primarily comprised of large independent or multinational corporate entities with stable payment experience. Historically, we have not encountered significant difficulty in collecting receivables and typically do not require collateral for our receivables.

Inventories of materials and supplies has increased by approximately $15.6 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 due to inventory for the ATWOOD AURORA, which commenced operations in April 2009, and due to increased purchasing of high dollar, value critical spare parts for our fleet.

Prepaid expenses and deferred costs have decreased by approximately $7.4 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 primarily due to the amortization of annual rig insurance premiums which are generally renewed and paid for during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.

Accrued liabilities have increased by approximately $13.7 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 primarily due to a higher amount of accrued but unpaid agent fees and capital expenditures.

Income tax payable has increased by approximately by approximately $6.2 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 due to increased tax accruals resulting from higher earnings and the timing of tax payments associated with these accruals.

Short-term deferred credits have increased by approximately $5.8 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 due to a prepayment of revenue by a customer during the current quarter which will be recognized as revenue in the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

Long-term deferred credits have decreased by approximately $4.8 million at June 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 due to the amortization of deferred fees associated with the prior upgrade of the ATWOOD FALCON. Lump sum fees received for upgrade costs reimbursed by our customers are reported as deferred credits in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are recognized as earned on a straight-line method over the term of the related drilling contracts.

PART I. ITEM 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk, including adverse changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as discussed below.

INTEREST RATE RISK

All of our $250 million of long-term debt outstanding at June 30, 2009, was floating rate debt. As a result, our annual interest costs in fiscal year 2009 will fluctuate based on interest rate changes. The impact on annual cash flow of a 10% change in the floating rate (approximately 25 basis points) would be approximately $0.6 million, which we believe to be immaterial. We did not have any open derivative contracts relating to our floating rate debt at June 30, 2009.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

Certain of our subsidiaries have monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than their functional currencies. Based on June 30, 2009 amounts, a decrease in the value of 10% in the foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar from the year-end exchange rates would result in a foreign currency transaction gain of approximately $0.5 million. Thus, we consider our current risk exposure to foreign currency exchange rate movements, based on net cash flows, to be immaterial. We did not have any open derivative contracts relating to foreign currencies at June 30, 2009.

PART I. ITEM 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are effective at the reasonable assurance level so that the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules, regulations and forms and have been accumulated and communicated to our management, including executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b)	Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation dated February 9, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.2

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation dated February 14, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.3

Second Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated May 5, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.4

Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated June 7, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

4.1

Rights Agreement dated effective October 18, 2002 between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 8-A filed October 21, 2002).

4.2

Certificate of Adjustment of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. dated as of March 17, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 8-K filed March 23, 2006).

4.3

Certificate of Adjustment of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. dated as of June 25, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 8-K filed June 25, 2008).

4.4

See Exhibit Nos. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 hereof for provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (as amended) and Second Amended and Restated By-Laws (as amended) defining the rights of our shareholders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

*31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

*31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

*32.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.2

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

*Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: August 6, 2009 /s/JAMES M. HOLLAND

James M. Holland

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer,

Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation dated February 9, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.2

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation dated February 14, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.3

Second Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated May 5, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

3.4

Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated June 7, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of our Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

4.1

4.2

Certificate of Adjustment of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. dated as of March 17, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 8-K filed March 23, 2006).

4.3

Certificate of Adjustment of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. dated as of June 25, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 8-K filed June 25, 2008).

4.4

*31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

*31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

*32.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.2

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.2

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

*Filed herewith